alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF GREGORY SMITH



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











---

Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CDG Investments Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory Smith, Chief Financial Officer and a Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





/s/ Gregory Smith





Gregory Smith,

Chief Financial Officer and Director
State v. Juan Antonia Miller

2P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 4, 2017

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for Miller, Juan Antonia.

John G. Batherson, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of January 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th of January 2017."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7969-9]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice; request for public comment.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Action (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed Administrative Order on Consent (“AOC,” Region 9 Docket No. 9-2005-0021) pursuant to section 122(h) of CERCLA concerning the Lauli'i Cylinders Removal Site (the “Site”), located in Lauli'i, American Samoa. The respondent to the AOC is FCF Fisheries Co. LTD (“FCF”), which arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances at the Site for which EPA incurred response costs.

Through the proposed AOC, FCF will reimburse the United States $20,000 of its response costs, which total approximately $130,000. The AOC provides FCF with a covenant not to sue and contribution protection for the costs and the removal action at the Site.

For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the proposed AOC. The Agency's response to any comments will be available for public inspection at EPA'S Region IX offices, located at 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105.

# DATES:

Comments must be submitted on or before October 17, 2005.

# ADDRESSES:

The proposed Agreement may be obtained from Judith Winchell, Docket Clerk, telephone (415) 972-3124. Comments regarding the proposed Agreement should be addressed to Judith Winchell (SFD-7) at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105, and should reference the Lauli'i Cylinders Superfund Removal Site, Lauli'i, American Samoa, and USEPA Docket No. 9-2005-0021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

J. Andrew Helmlinger, Office of Regional Counsel, telephone (415) 972-3904, USEPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105.

Dated: September 2, 2005.

Keith A. Takata,

Director, Superfund Division.

[FR Doc. 05-18423 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**Exhibit 10.4**

**AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

This **AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT** (“Amendment”) is entered into this 21st day ofFebruary 2007, by and between **PLACER SIERRA BANK** (“Bank”) and **KEVIN J. BARRI** (“Employee”). 

**WHEREAS,** Employee and Bank entered into an Employment Agreement, dated June 21, 2004, (the “Agreement”); and 

**WHEREAS**, the “Employment Term” under the Agreement is scheduled to expire on June 21, 2007; and 

**WHEREAS**, Section 5 of the Agreement sets forth Bank’s potential obligations upon the termination of Employee’s employment with Bank; and 

**WHEREAS**, Employee and Bank have agreed to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment in order to extend the term of the Agreement and to provide for payments to be made in compliance withSection 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and guidance thereunder, which section was added to the Code by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004; and 

**WHEREAS**, Section 22 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by the parties. 

**NOW THEREFORE,**Employee and Bank agree as follows: 

1. Section 3 of the Agreement is amended by the addition of a sentence to the end thereof to read as set forth below: 

The Employment Term is hereby extended through and including December 31, 2007, and all references herein to the “Employment Term” shall include such extension. 

2. A new Subsection (h) entitled “Timing of Payment” is added to Section 5 of the Agreement, to read as set forth below: 

(h) **Timing of Payment**. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, if any amount payable hereunder is considered to becompensation deferred under a “nonqualified deferred compensation plan” as defined for purposes of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”), and if Employee is deemed to be a“specified employee” as defined for purposes of Section 409A, then, to the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A, amounts due under this Agreement in connection with a termination of Employee’s employment that wouldotherwise have been payable at any time during the six-month period immediately following such termination 

 

1 

of employment shall not be paid prior to, and shall instead be payable in a lump sum as soon aspracticable following, the expiration of such six-month period. In light of the uncertainty surrounding the application of Section 409A, Bank makes no guarantee as to the income tax treatment under Section 409A of any payments made orbenefits provided under this Agreement. 

3. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 
**PLACER SIERRA BANK**  By: /s/ Frank J.Mercardante                                          /s/ Kevin J.Barri                                        
      Frank J. Mercardante

      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  **KEVIN J. BARRI**
 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      33,825,797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,150,795
<PP&E>                                       3,701,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                 821,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,715,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,573,625
<BONDS>                                      1,298,484
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,757
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,751,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,715,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,919,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             226,959
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,083,432)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,083,432)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,083,432)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($1.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($1.11)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008022EN.01001502.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 November 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — Kerstin Sundelind Lopez v Miguel Enrique Lopez Lizazo

(Case C-68/07) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Articles 3, 6 and 7 - Jurisdiction - Recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility - Jurisdiction in divorce proceedings - Respondent not a national or a resident of a Member State - National rules providing for exorbitant jurisdiction)

(2008/C 22/29)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta domstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kerstin Sundelind Lopez

Applicant:

Defendant: Miguel Enrique Lopez Lizazo

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Högsta domstolen — Interpretation of Articles 3, 6 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1) — Jurisdiction for divorce proceedings where the respondent is neither resident within a Member State nor a citizen of a Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 6 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2116/2004 of 2 December 2004, as regards treaties with the Holy See, are to be interpreted as meaning that where, in divorce proceedings, a respondent is not habitually resident in a Member State and is not a national of a Member State, the courts of a Member State cannot base their jurisdiction to hear the petition on their national law, if the courts of another Member State have jurisdiction under Article 3 of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 14.4.2007.

1

---
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T MAY 4, 2010 J OHN L EY CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S
F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o . 0 9

- 1 4 7 2 6 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o . 0 9

- 0 0 0 8 9

- C R

- O R L

- 2 2

- K R S
U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s W I L B E R M A R R O Q U I N

- T O R R E S , a . k

. a . I s r a e l M a r r o q u i n - T o r r e s , a . k

. a . R o b e r t o C h a n g , a . k

. a . W i l b e r t M a r r o q u i n - T o r r e s , a . k

. a . J o r g e O r i t z - B a r r e r a , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( M a y 4 , 2 0 1 0 )
B e f o r e C A R N E S , B A R K E T T a n d M A R C U S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s .P E R C U R I A M :

C r a i g L

. C r a w f

o r d , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r W i l b e r M a r r o q u i n - T o r r e s i n t h i s d i r e c t c r i m i n a l a p p e a l , h a s m o v e d t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e

a p p e l l a n t a n d f

i l e d a b r i e f p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s
t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t ,
c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d M a r r o q u i n - T o r r e s ’ s c o n v i c t i o n

a n d s e n t e n c e a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Nevsun Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cliff T. Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Cliff T. Davis

Cliff T. Davis

Chief Executive Officer



March 26, 2010

































---
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3957 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 218–10 Merrick Boulevard in Springfield Gardens, New York, as the ‘‘Cynthia Jenkins Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3957 EH

1 SECTION 1. CYNTHIA JENKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 218–10 Merrick Boulevard in 

4 Springfield Gardens, New York, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Cynthia Jenkins Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Cynthia Jenkins Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 8, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3957 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postthia Jenkins Post Office Building’’. in Springfield Gardens, New York, as the ‘‘Cyn- al Service located at 218–10 Merrick Boulevard
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50229

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Joe Angel Martinez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:22-CR-201-1

______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit 

Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joe Angel 

Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 22, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50229 Document: 00516976719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2023
No. 23-50229

2

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2.

Case: 23-50229 Document: 00516976719 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/22/2023
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3852 

To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 

of 2002. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2014 

Ms. LEE of California (for herself, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, Mr. NADLER, and Mr. ELLISON) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force 

Against Iraq Resolution of 2002. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILI4 TARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 

5 2002. 

6 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

7 Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243; 50 U.S.C. 

8 1541 note) is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
21.1





SUBSIDIARIES
OF REGISTRANT


Cenveo,
Inc.


Cenveo
Corporation


Cenveo
Alberta Finance, LP


Cenveo
Commercial Ohio, LLC


Cenveo
Government Printing, Inc.


Cenveo
McLaren Morris and Todd Company


Cenveo
MM&T Packaging Company


3120587
Nova Scotia Company


Cenveo
Omemee LLC


Cenveo
Resale Ohio, LLC


Cenveo
Services, LLC


CNMW
Investments, Inc.


Colorhouse
China, Inc.


Discount
Labels, LLC


Rx
Technology Corp.


Rx JV
Holding, Inc.


CRX
Holding, Inc.


CRX JV,
LLC


PC Ink
Corp.


Printegra
Corporation


Madison/Graham
ColorGraphics, Inc.


Madison/Graham
ColorGraphics Interstate Services, Inc.


Cadmus
Delaware, Inc.


Cadmus
Direct Marketing, Inc.


Cadmus
Financial Distribution, Inc.


Cadmus
Hong Kong Limited


Cadmus
Interactive, Inc.


Cadmus
International Holdings, Inc.


Cadmus
Investments, LLC


Cadmus
Journal Services, Inc.


Cadmus
KnowledgeWorks International Ltd. (Mauritius)


KnowledgeWorks
Global Ltd. (India)


Cadmus
Marketing Group, Inc.


Cadmus
Marketing, Inc.


Cadmus
Marketing UK Limited (UK)


Cadmus/O’Keefe
Marketing, Inc.


Cadmus
Packaging Company Limited (Thailand)


Cadmus
Packaging Private Limited (India)


Cadmus
Packaging (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (China)


Cadmus
Printing Group Inc.


Cadmus
Technology Solutions, Inc.


Cadmus
UK, Inc.


American
Graphics, Inc.


CDMS
Management, LLC


Expert
Graphics, Inc.


Garamond/Pridemark
Press, Inc.


Old TSI
Inc.


Port City
Press, Inc.


Science
Craftsman Incorporated


Vaughn
Printers Incorporated


VSUB
Holding Company


Washburn
Graphics, Inc.


Commercial
Envelope Manufacturing Co., Inc.


Berlin
& Jones Co., LLC


Henrich
Envelope, LLC


Cenveo
CEM, LLC


Cenveo
CEM, Inc.


Rex
Corporation


136
Eastport Road, LLC


Lightning
Labels, LLC
Filed 10/22/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2008 ND 181

Lewis House, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Paul Royer and Heather Royer, Defendants and Appellants

No. 20080081

Appeal from the District Court of Dickey County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel D. Narum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Sara J. Gerving, Bucklin, Klemin, McBride & Schweigert, P.C., P.O. Box 955, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-0955, for plaintiff and appellee.

Kent M. Morrow, Severin, Ringsak & Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for defendants and appellants.

House v. Royer

No. 20080081

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Paul Royer and Heather Royer appeal from a judgment evicting them from an Ellendale home they had attempted to purchase from Lewis House.  The Royers argue the district court erred in following the eviction procedures for violation of a written lease agreement under N.D.C.C. ch. 33-06 rather than the procedures for cancellation of land contracts under N.D.C.C. ch. 32-18.  The Royers did not raise this issue in the district court.  This Court does not address issues raised for the first time on appeal.  See, e.g., Heng v. Rotech Med. Corp., 2006 ND 176, ¶ 9, 720 N.W.2d 54.  Accordingly, we summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4126 

To authorize the construction of the expansion of San Luis Reservoir in 

California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2014 

Mr. COSTA (for himself, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. FARR, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. BERA

of California, and Mr. CA ́RDENAS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the construction of the expansion of San Luis 

Reservoir in California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘San Luis Reservoir 

5 Expansion Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAN LUIS RESERVOIR EXPANSION. 

7 Section 103(f) of Title I of Public Law 108–361 (the 

8 Calfed Bay-Delta Authorization Act, 118 Stat. 1681) is 

9 amended by— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4126 IH

1 (a) Striking subparagraph (1) and inserting the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(1) CONVEYANCE AND EXPANSION.—The 

4 amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 

5 109 may be expended for the following.’’ 

6 (b) Inserting ‘‘including the increase of storage ca7 pacity at San Luis Reservoir,’’ after ‘‘improvement 

8 project,’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS