alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 11 June 2009 – Greece v Commission**

**(Case T-33/07)**

EAGGF – Guarantee Section – Expenditure excluded from Community financing – Olive oil, cotton, dried grapes and citrus fruits – Non-compliance with payment deadlines – Period of 24 months – Assessment of the expenditure to be excluded – Key controls – Principle of proportionality – Principle of ne bis in idem – Extrapolation of the findings of default

1.                     *Agriculture – EAGGF – Clearance of accounts (Commission Regulation No 1663/95, as amended by Regulation No 2245/1999, Art.
8(1)) (see paras 80-82, 116-117, 140, 197, 265, 279, 285, 292-294, 321, 372)*

2.                     *Acts of the institutions – Regulations – Regulation prescribing specific control measures (see paras 166, 190)*

3.                     *Community law – Principles – Protection of legitimate expectations – Conditions (see para. 227)*

4.                     *Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – EAGGF financing – Accounts clearance procedure (Council Regulation No 1258/1999,
Art. 7(4), fifth para., (a); Commission Regulation No 1663/95, as amended by Regulation No 2245/1999, Art. 8(1)) (see paras
230-232, 236, 240, 381)*

5.                     *Actions for annulment – Jurisdiction of the Community judicature – Commission decision withdrawing Community financial assistance
(Art. 231 EC) (see para. 380)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2006/932/EC of 14 December 2006 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2006 L 355, p. 96), in so far as it relates to certain expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic in the sectors of olive oil, dried grapes, citrus fruit and financial control. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
State v. Andrew Robert Holloway

454P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 20, 2016

Ms. Michele Goldman, Attorney at Law, For Holloway, Andrew Robert.

Mr. Scott T. Stroud, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Ted Bell, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of December 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of December 2016."
State of North Carolina v. Travis Lamont Daughtridge

No. 329P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Attorney at Law, for Daughtridge, Travis Lamont.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of September 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 15th of September 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE
CORPORATION'S INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          14,979
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,089
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     79,241
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        644,954
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 782,145
<DEPOSITS>                                     601,747
<SHORT-TERM>                                    29,712
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,388
<LONG-TERM>                                     59,958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 782,144
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 21,383
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,478
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   368
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,229
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,080
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,009
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,140
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      264
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (4)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,410
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.63
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,005
<LOANS-PAST>                                       556
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,251
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       32
<RECOVERIES>                                        42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,866
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,781
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,085


</TABLE>
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 July 2007 – Commission v Greece**

**(Case C‐26/07)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2004/80/EC – Compensation to crime victims – Failure to transpose within the period prescribed

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 6)

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims (OJ 2004 L 261, p. 15). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2008 – Anvil Knitwear v OHIM – Aprile e Aprile (Aprile)**

**(Case T-179/07)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community figurative mark Aprile – Earlier national word mark ANVIL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Articles 8(1)(b), 73 and 74 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 55, 57-63)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 March 2007 (Case R-1076/2006-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Anvil Knitwear, Inc. and Aprile e Aprile Srl. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Anvil Knitwear, Inc. to pay the costs. |
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Todd WALKER

No. 133P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, Cary, for Walker, Michael Todd.

Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of April 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

Assigned on Briefs April 12, 2005 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL L. CALANDROS

Criminal Court for Sullivan County

No. S41,624

No. E2004-02382-CCA-R3-CD

JUDGMENT

Came the appellant, Michael L. Calandros, pro se, and also came the Attorney General on

behalf of the State of Tennessee, and this case was heard on the record on appeal from the Criminal

Court of Sullivan County; and upon consideration thereof, this Court is of the opinion that this

avenue of appeal is unavailable to the defendant because the sentence in this case is neither illegal

nor void.

In accordance with the opinion filed herein, it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this

Court that the appeal is dismissed, and the case is remanded to the Criminal Court of Sullivan

County for execution of the judgment of that court and/or for further proceedings and for collection

of costs accrued below.

It appearing that the appellant, Michael L. Calandros, is indigent, costs of appeal will be

taxed to the State of Tennessee.

Judge John Everett Williams

Judge Thomas T. Woodall

Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 183 (Thursday, September 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55657-55658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18967]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5192]

Determination on Provision of Assistance to the United Nations 
Democracy Fund

    Pursuant to section 451 of the Foreign Assistance Act of l961, as 
amended (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2261) and section 1-100 of Executive 
Order 12163, as amended, I hereby authorize, notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the use of up to $2,561,508 in fiscal year 2004 funds 
made available under chapter 3 of part I of the Act, up to $6,938,492 
in FY 2004 and FY 2005 funds made available under chapter 4 of part II 
of the Act, and up to $500,000 in FY 2005 funds made available under 
chapter 9 of part II of the Act, in order to provide assistance 
authorized by part I of the Act for a contribution to the United 
Nations Democracy Fund. This Determination supersedes and replaces the 
Determination of July 27, 2005, on Provision of Assistance to United 
Nations Democracy Fund.
    This Determination shall be reported to the Congress promptly, and 
shall be published in the Federal Register.

[[Page 55658]]

    Dated: September 10, 2005.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-18967 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-37-P
```
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY v. LEDFORD

223PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 3, 2017

Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, for North Carolina Department of Public Safety.

Larry Leake, Attorney at Law, Asheville, Jamie A. Stokes, Attorney at Law, for Ledford, Chauncey John.

J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, Megan Ashley Milliken, Attorney at Law, for Southern States Police Benevolent Association, et al.

Michael C. Byrne, Attorney at Law, Norris Arden Adams, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for State Employees Association of North Carolina and North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of April 2017 by Petitioner to Withdraw Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of April 2017."
AMENDMENT  to  the  Bylaws  of  Gold  Capital  Corporation,  a  corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado, adopted this 6th
day December 1996.
                               
I.   Article I,  Section  1.D.  of the  Bylaws is hereby  amended to read in its
     entirety as follows:
          
     "Article I, Section 1 Annual  Meetings.  D. Notice.  Written  notice at the
     address last shown on the books of the Corporation  stating the place,  day
     and hour of the meeting,  and in the case of a Special  Meeting the purpose
     for which the meeting is called,  shall be  delivered  not less than thirty
     (30) days nor more than  fifty (50) days  before  the date of the  meeting,
     either  personally or by mail at the direction of the President,  Secretary
     or other officer or person calling the meeting."; and further

II.  Article II,  Section  5.A.  of the Bylaws is hereby  amended to read in its
     entirety as follows:

     "Section 5. Closing of Transfer Books; Record Date. A. Record Date. In lieu
     of closing  the Stock  Transfer  Books,  the Board of  Directors  may fix a
     future date as the record date for such determination of Stockholders, such
     date in any case to be not more than seventy (70) days prior to the date of
     action which requires such determination."; and further

III. Article  IV,  Section  2. of the  Bylaws is hereby  amended  to read in its
     entirety as follows:
         
     "Article IV Officers.  Section 2. Removal. Any Officer or agent or employee
     of the  Corporation  may be  removed  by a  majority  vote of the  Board of
     Directors  whenever in its judgment the best  interests of the  Corporation
     will be served thereby,  but such removal shall be without prejudice to the
     contract rights, if any, of the person so removed.  Election or appointment
     of any Officer or agent shall not of itself create contract rights."

IV.  Article V,  Section  5.  Corporation  to Have Right of First  Option to Buy
     Stock of the Bylaws is hereby deleted in its entirety.

With the  foregoing  exception,  the  remaining  provisions of the Bylaws of the
Corporation shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  fixed  my  signature  and  the  seal  of the
Corporation this ..... day of ........., 199.....



                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Raymond E. McElhaney, Secretary
State v. Dale Patrick Martin

210P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

*778Charlotte G. Blake, Attorney at Law, Boone, Dale P. Martin, for Martin, Dale Patrick.

Michael T. Wood, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of May 2016 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41054

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WILLIE MIRANDA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-1430-5

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Willie Miranda has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Miranda has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
State of North Carolina v. Jeremy Jerome Oliver

No. 232P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Mr. Jeremy Jerome Oliver, for Oliver, Jeremy Jerome.

Mr. Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th of June 2016 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,181
<ALLOWANCES>                                       742
<INVENTORY>                                     21,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,017
<PP&E>                                         250,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,581
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,961
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               719,925
<CGS>                                          561,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  662,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,116
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,116
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,016
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</FN>


</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136573 Marilyn Kelly
 

Maura D. Corrigan
 

Robert P. Young, Jr.
 

RICKY A. TAYLOR, Stephen J. Markman,
 

Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 136573 

 COA: 280363 

Court of Claims: 07-000044-MP 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 3, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

 KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

d1015 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 22, 2008 

 Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. William Anthony LESANE, Jr.

No. 141P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 5, 2017

William A. LeSane, Jr., for LeSane, William A. (Jr.)

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th of April 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of May 2017."
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary A. Corless, President and Chief Executive Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gary A. Corless                            
|Gary A. Corless                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                                               
|May 26, 2010