alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE
CORPORATION'S INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          17,899
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,783
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     86,089
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        597,044
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 745,381
<DEPOSITS>                                     583,140
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,572
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,709
<LONG-TERM>                                     60,669
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 745,381
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,933
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,268
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   123
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,324
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,508
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 834
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,982
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      114
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,023
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.79
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,835
<LOANS-PAST>                                       683
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,251
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       16
<RECOVERIES>                                        26
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,713
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,693
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,020


</TABLE>
State of North Carolina v. William Davis Whitaker, Defendant.

No. COA16-521

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

NO ERROR.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Nevsun Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cliff T. Davis, the Executive VP and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Cliff T. Davis

Cliff T. Davis

Executive VP & Chief Financial Officer



March 24, 2008
STATE of North Carolina v. David FELTON

No. 54P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

David Felton, for Felton, David.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina *292***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th of February 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of February 2017 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of February 2017 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
BMP SUNSTONE CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: June 30, 2008
    /s/ Fred M. PowellFred M. PowellChief Financial Officer
# C_2008272EN.01002603.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/26

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 September 2008 — Nuova Agricast v Commission

(Case T-479/07) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Withdrawal of the decision refusing access - Disclosure of documents against the explicit opinion of the author thereof - No need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 272/51)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Nuova Agricast (Foggia, Italy) (represented by: A. Calabrese, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and G. Conte, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission decision of 17 October 2007, which refused the applicant access to certain documents sent to the Commission by the Italian Government in the context of the review procedure for a State aid scheme

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application and on the Kingdom of Denmark's application to intervene; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application and on the Kingdom of Denmark's application to intervene;

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.

1

---
GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation, an Iowa Corporation formerly known as GreatAmerica Leasing Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Lillington Family Chiropractic, PA, and Dee Austin-Cox, Defendants.

No. COA15-1314

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4115 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to temporarily waive certain vehicle 

weight limits for covered logging vehicles, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2014 

Mr. NOLAN (for himself, Mr. DUFFY, Mr. RIBBLE, and Mr. PETERSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to temporarily 

waive certain vehicle weight limits for covered logging 

vehicles, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Winter Roads Safety 

5 Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY WAIVER. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—During the period beginning on 

8 the date of enactment of this Act and ending on April 15, 

9 2014, the Secretary of Transportation shall waive, for a 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4115 IH

1 covered logging vehicle, the application of any vehicle 

2 weight limit established under section 127 of title 23, 

3 United States Code. 

4 (b) COVERED LOGGING VEHICLE DEFINED.—In this 

5 section, the term ‘‘covered logging vehicle’’ means a vehi6 cle that— 

7 (1) is transporting raw or unfinished forest 

8 products, including logs, pulpwood, biomass, or wood 

9 chips; 

10 (2) has a gross vehicle weight of not more than 

11 99,000 pounds; 

12 (3) has not less than 6 axles; and 

13 (4) is operating on a segment of— 

14 (A) Interstate Route 35 in Minnesota from 

15 mile marker 235.4 to mile marker 259.552; 

16 (B) Interstate Route 535 in Minnesota 

17 from mile marker 0 to mile marker 1.571; 

18 (C) Interstate Route 39 in Wisconsin from 

19 mile marker 175.8 to mile marker 189; or 

20 (D) Interstate Route 535 in Wisconsin 

21 from mile marker 0 to mile marker 1.19. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2011269EN.01004003.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2011 — Total and Elf Aquitaine v Commission

(Case T-190/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Imputability of the infringement - Rights of the defence - Presumption of innocence - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Equal treatment - Principle that penalties must fit the offence - Principle of nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege - Principle of sound administration - Legal certainty - Misuse of powers - Fines)

2011/C 269/88

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Total SA (Courbevoie, France) and Elf Aquitaine SA (Courbevoie, France) (represented by: É. Morgan de Rivery, A. Noël-Baron and E. Lagathu, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by F. Arbault and O. Beynet, and subsequently by V. Bottka, P.J. Van Nuffel and B. Gencarelli, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 1766 final of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.620 — Hydrogen peroxide and perborate) and, in the alternative, for amendment of Article 2(i) of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.

1

---
NUMBER 13-19-00502-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

SOUTH TEXAS BRAIN & SPINE 

INSTITUTE, P.A. D/B/A SOUTH 

TEXAS BRAIN & SPINE CENTER, Appellant,

v.

BAY AREA HEALTHCARE GROUP, 

LTD. D/B/A CORPUS CHRISTI 

MEDICAL CENTER, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 117th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant, South Texas Brain & Spine Institute, P.A. d/b/a South Texas Brain & 

Spine Center, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 117th District Court of 

Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 2019DCV-1339-B. The parties have filed a 
2

joint motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that all matters in controversy between 

them in this cause have been compromised and settled. The parties request that this 

Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to 

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 

The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will 

be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the 

parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at 

the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will 

issue forthwith.

GINA M. BENAVIDES,

Justice

Delivered and filed the 

19th day of December, 2019.
# C_2008327EN.01004201.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/42

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 October 2008 — Las Palmeras and Others v Council and Commission

(Joined Cases T-217/07, T-218/07, T-244/07 to T-246/07, T-252/07 to T-255/07, T-258/07 to T-260/07, T-268/07 to T-272/07 and T-394/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 327/77)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that Joined Cases T-217/07, T-218/07, T-244/07, T-245/07, T-246/07, T-253/07, T-254/07, T-255/07, T-258/07, T-259/07, T-260/07, T-268/07, T-269/07, T-270/07 and T-394/07 be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---
# C_2009006EN.01002901.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/29

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 November 2008 — GretagMacbeth v OHIM (Combination of 24 coloured squares)

(Case T-400/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community colour mark - Combination of 24 coloured squares - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 6/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: GretagMacbeth LLC (New Windsor, New York, United States) (represented by: J. Weiser, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 August 2007 (Case R 30/2007-4) concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a colour sign composed of 24 coloured squares

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | orders GretagMacbeth LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders GretagMacbeth LLC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 22.12.2007.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4081 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4081

To prohibit funds made available to the Department of Education or the 
Department of Justice from being used to provide postsecondary courses 
                              in prisons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2014

    Mr. Collins of New York (for himself, Mr. Reed, and Mr. Gibson) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
 the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the 
 Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit funds made available to the Department of Education or the 
Department of Justice from being used to provide postsecondary courses 
                              in prisons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR COLLEGE COURSES IN PRISONS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no funds made available 
to the Department of Education or the Department of Justice shall be 
used to provide or assist in providing a postsecondary course to an 
inmate in a Federal or State prison.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010288EN.01003101.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Tomra Systems and Others v Commission

(Case T-155/06) (1)

(Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Market for machines for the collection of used beverage containers - Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement - Exclusivity agreements, quantity commitments and loyalty rebates forming part of a strategy of excluding competitors from the market - Fine - Proportionality)

(2010/C 288/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Tomra Systems ASA (Asker, Norway); Tomra Europe AS (Asker); Tomra Systems GmbH (Hilden, Germany); Tomra Systems BV (Apeldoorn, Netherlands); Tomra Leergutsysteme GmbH (Vienna, Austria); Tomra Systems AB (Sollentuna, Sweden); and Tomra Butikksystemer AS (Asker) (represented by: initially, A. Ryan, Solicitor, and J. Midthjell, lawyer, and, subsequently, by A. Ryan and N. Frey, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 734 final of 29 March 2006 relating to proceedings under Article 82 [EC] and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E 1/38.113 — Prokent Tomra)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tomra Systems ASA, Tomra Europe AS, Tomra Systems GmbH, Tomra Systems BV, Tomra Leergutsysteme GmbH, Tomra Systems AB and Tomra Butikksystemer AS to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tomra Systems ASA, Tomra Europe AS, Tomra Systems GmbH, Tomra Systems BV, Tomra Leergutsysteme GmbH, Tomra Systems AB and Tomra Butikksystemer AS to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 12.8.2006.

---
Tully v. City of Wilmington

348A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2017

Katie Weaver Hartzog, Attorney at Law, Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for City of Wilmington.

S. Luke Largess, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Cheyenne Chambers, Attorney at Law, for Tully, Kevin J.

*211J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, Megan Ashley Milliken, Attorney at Law, for Southern States Police Benevolent Association, et al.

M. Travis Payne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Professional Fire Fighters and Paramedics of North Carolina.

Michael C. Byrne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.

Robert M. Elliot, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Reynolds Michael Elliot, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief filed on the 24th of January 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of January 2017."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 24th day of February 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
HOWELL v. N.C. WAYNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

326P15-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Burl Anderson Howell, For Howell, Burl Anderson.

Michael T. Wood, Special Deputy Attorney General, E.B. Borden Parker, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, For N.C. Wayne County *237Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of July 2016 by Petitioner for Appeal In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."