alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4148 

To phase out cosmetic animal testing and the sale of cosmetics tested on 

animals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2014 

Mr. MORAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To phase out cosmetic animal testing and the sale of 

cosmetics tested on animals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Humane Cosmetics 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 The purpose of this Act is to phase out cosmetic ani8 mal testing and the sale of cosmetics tested on animals. 

9 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

10 In this Act: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4148 IH

1 (1) COSMETIC.—The term ‘‘cosmetic’’ has the 

2 meaning given to such term in section 201 of the 

3 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 

4 321). 

5 (2) COSMETIC ANIMAL TESTING.—The term 

6 ‘‘cosmetic animal testing’’ means the application or 

7 exposure of any cosmetic to the skin, eyes, or other 

8 body part of a live non-human vertebrate for pur9 poses of evaluating the safety or efficacy of a cos10 metic. 

11 SEC. 4. PROHIBITIONS. 

12 (a) PROHIBITED TESTING.—It shall be unlawful for 

13 any entity, whether private or governmental, to conduct 

14 or contract for cosmetic animal testing that occurs in the 

15 United States and is in or affecting interstate commerce. 

16 (b) PROHIBITED SALE OR TRANSPORT.—It shall be 

17 unlawful to sell, offer for sale, or transport in interstate 

18 commerce any cosmetic if the final product or any compo19 nent thereof was developed or manufactured using cos20 metic animal testing conducted or contracted for after the 

21 effective date specified in section 6(a). 

22 SEC. 5. CIVIL PENALTIES. 

23 (a) IN GENERAL.—In addition to any other penalties 

24 applicable under law, whoever violates any provision of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4148 IH

1 this Act shall be assessed a civil penalty of not more than 

2 $10,000 for each such violation. 

3 (b) MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS.—Each violation of this 

4 Act with respect to a separate animal, and each day that 

5 a violation of this Act continues, constitutes a separate 

6 offense. 

7 SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATES. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION ON COSMETIC ANIMAL TESTING.— 

9 The prohibition in section 4(a) takes effect on the date 

10 that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act. 

11 (b) PROHIBITION ON SALE.—The prohibition in sec12 tion 4(b) takes effect on the date that is 3 years after 

13 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2009256EN.01000302.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank te ’s-Gravenhage (Netherlands)) — AHP Manufacturing BV v Bureau voor de Industriële Eigendom

(Case C-482/07) (1)

1

(Patent law - Proprietary medicinal products - Regulations (EEC) No 1768/92 and (EC) No 1610/96 - Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products - Conditions for granting certificates to two or more holders of basic patents for the same product - Clarification on the existence of pending applications)

2009/C 256/05

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank te ’s-Gravenhage

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AHP Manufacturing BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Bureau voor de Industriële Eigendom

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank te ’s-Gravenhage — Interpretation of Articles 3(1)(c), 7(1) and (2), 9 and 13 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 of 18 June 1992 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (OJ 1992 L 182, p. 1) and of recital 17 and the second sentence of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products (OJ 1996 L 198, p. 30) — Issue of a certificate to the holder of a basic patent for a product which, at the time of submission of the application for a certificate, is the subject of one or more certificates issued to one or more holders of other basic patents

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(c) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 of 18 June 1992 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products, considered in the light of the second sentence of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products, must be interpreted as not precluding the grant of a supplementary protection certificate to the holder of a basic patent for a product for which, at the time the certificate application is submitted, one or more certificates have already been granted to one or more holders of one or more other basic patents.

---

(1)  OJ C 8, 12.1.2008.

1

---
# C_2008197EN.01003605.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/36

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 June 2008 — Chupa Chups v Commission

(Case T-331/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 197/69)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 20.10.2007.

1

---
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 17 December 2008 – Somm v OHIM (Shelter for shade)**

**(Case T-351/07)**

Community trade mark – Application for Community tri-dimensional mark – Shelter for shade – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Lack of distinctive character acquired by use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of any distinctive character (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 26, 30)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 June 2007 (Case R 1653/2006‐1) concerning an application for registration of a tri-dimensional sign representing a shelter for shade as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Somm Srl |
| Community trade mark sought: | Three-dimensional trade mark described as follows: (‘Three-dimensional whole constituted by a large number of tubular posts of metal, placed at a distance from and aligned with each other, tapering and substantially curved at the bend, each having a base line, fixed to the ground, essentially vertical and a line with open extremities slightly inclined towards the top, a large number of tubular parts of metal, placed at a distance from and parallel with each other, fixed on inclined lines of those posts, and a cover to provide shade fixed on said tubular parts, the whole forming a shaded shelter’); for goods in Classes 6 and 19 – Application No 4837746 |
| Decision of the examiner: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Somm Srl to pay the costs. |
# C_2008313EN.01002103.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 September 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Italy) — Colasfalti S.r.l. v Provincia di Milano, ATI Legrenzi Srl, Impresa Costruzioni Edili e Stradali dei F. 11i Paccani Snc

(Case C-214/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 313/33)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 29.7.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 14
 FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
CODE OF ETHICS
 In my role with Fentura Financial, Inc. and/or subsidiaries or affiliates (the Company), I
certify to the Company and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company,
that I will adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing
my professional and ethical conduct to the best of my knowledge and ability:
 1.
    
    I will act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of
interest in all personal and professional relationships.
 2.
    
    I will provide information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant,
timely and understandable.
 3.
    
    I will comply with the rules and regulations of federal, state, and local
governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.
 4.
    
    I will act in good faith, responsibly, and with due care. I will not
misrepresent material facts or allow my independent judgment to be subordinated or
otherwise compromised.
 5.
    
    I will respect and maintain the confidentiality of information reviewed or
acquired in carrying out my duties except when authorized or otherwise legally
obligated to disclose.
 6.
    
    I will share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to the needs
of the Company.
 7.
    
    I will proactively practice and promote ethical behavior as a professional in
my role with the Company.
 8.
    
    I will not solicit for myself or for a third party anything of value from
anyone in return for any business, service or confidential information of the Company,
nor will I accept anything of value from anyone (except for my wages and as otherwise
permitted by law) in connection with the business of the Company, either before or
after a transaction is discussed or completed.
 9.
    
    I will comply with and adhere to all of the Companys policies and practices,
including those policies governing accounting and financial reporting practices and
corporate governance.
 10.

    I will respond honestly and candidly when dealing with the Companys
independent and internal auditors, regulators and attorneys.
 11.

    I will promptly disclose to an appropriate person or persons any transaction or
relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest,
and/or violations of this Code.
 (Signature)
    
    (Date)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

###### National Endowment for the Arts 

      ( print page 55425)    
Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that the October 3, 2005 teleconference meeting of the Arts Advisory Panel (AccessAbility) to the National Council on the Arts, previously announced as 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. e.d.t., will instead be held from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. As announced, this meeting will be closed. 

Closed meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of April 8, 2005, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code. 

Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, or call 202/682-5691. 

Dated:September 14, 2005. 

Kathy Plowitz-Worden, 

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts. 

[FR Doc. 05-18855 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4152 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4152

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
        To provide for the costs of loan guarantees for Ukraine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROVISION OF COSTS OF LOAN GUARANTEES FOR UKRAINE.

    From amounts appropriated or otherwise made available under 
``Economic Support Fund'' in division K of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113-76), and prior Acts making 
appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and 
related programs, funding from unobligated balances shall be made 
available for the costs, as defined in section 502 of the Congressional 
Budget Act of 1974, of loan guarantees for Ukraine, which are 
authorized to be provided in an appropriations Act, in accordance with 
section 504 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974: Provided, That 
amounts made available for the costs of such guarantees shall not be 
considered ``assistance'' for the purpose of provisions of law limiting 
assistance to such country: Provided further, That none of the funds 
may be made available from amounts designated pursuant to section 
251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act 
of 1985.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 6, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4152

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

        To provide for the costs of loan guarantees for Ukraine.
```
Alston-Toure v. Toure, et al.

362P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Ms. Aleta Alston-Toure, Pro Se.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of October 2016 by Plaintiff for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3653

___________ Richard Cavaluzzi, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States Karen Schweppe; Neena Hicks, * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Plaintiffs, * * [UNPUBLISHED] v. * * AutoZone, Inc. * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: August 3, 2001 Filed: August 8, 2001

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. RichardCavaluzzi appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to his employer, AutoZone, Inc., in his action asserting race discrimination and-2-

retaliation claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), and the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, whichis appropriate only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Barge v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. , 87 F.3d 256, 258 (8th Cir. 1996). Having carefully reviewed the record and parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude that Cavaluzzi’s claims fail because he did not present evidence of an adverse employment

action. See Gillming v. Simmons Indus. , 91 F.3d 1168, 1173 n.2 (8th Cir. 1996) (applying same analysis to Title VII and MHRA claims); London v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. , 72 F.3d 620, 624 (8th Cir. 1995) (elements of prima facie case of race discrimination under Title VII); Evans v. T.W. Servs., Inc. , 930 F.2d 612, 614 (8th Cir. 1991) (elements of prima facie retaliation case under Title VII). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2008051EN.01006004.xml

| 23.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/60

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2007 — Borco-Marken-Import Matthiesen v OHIM — Tequilas del Señor (TEQUILA GOLD Sombrero Negro)

(Case T-182/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 51/112)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.

1

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SouthCrest
      Financial Group, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      for
      the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “ Periodic
      Report ”),
      the
      undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
      to
      Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his individual knowledge and
      belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: August
              15,
              2005/s/
                Larry T. KuglarLarry
                T. KuglarChief
                Executive Officer
In the MATTER OF: W.C.D.

No. COA16-351

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 15, 2016

AFFIRMED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4127 

To authorize the construction of the Upper San Joaquin River Storage in 

California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2014 

Mr. COSTA (for himself, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. BERA of California, and Mr. CA ́RDENAS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the construction of the Upper San Joaquin 

River Storage in California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper San Joaquin 

5 River Storage Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UPPER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER STORAGE. 

7 Section 103(d)(1)(B) of title I of Public Law 108– 

8 361 (the Calfed Bay-Delta Authorization Act, 118 Stat. 

9 1681) is amended by— 

10 (a) adding after clause (iii) the following: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4127 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZA2 TION.—If the Secretary determines a 

3 project described in clause (ii), subclause 

4 (II) of subparagraph (A) is feasible, the 

5 Secretary, subject to appropriations, is au6 thorized to carry out the project in a man7 ner that is substantially in accordance with 

8 the recommended plan, and subject to the 

9 conditions described in the feasibility 

10 study.’’; and 

11 (b) striking in clause (ii) ‘‘the project’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘a project described in clause (ii), subclause (II) of sub13 paragraph (A)’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 December 2009 – Cofac v Commission**

**(Case T-158/07)**

ESF – Reduction in financial assistance – Training schemes – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard

Social policy – European Social Fund – Financial assistance for vocational training – Decision to reduce assistance initially granted – Defence rights of beneficiaries – Scope (see paras 35-37, 39, 54)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for annulment of Commission Decision D(2005) 13066 of 3 June 2005 reducing the amount of the financial assistance granted to the applicant by the European Social Fund (ESF) by Decision No C(88) 0831 of 29 April 1988 for training schemes (file No 880707 P1). |

**Operative part:**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Cofac – Cooperativa de Formação e Animação Cultural, CRL to pay the costs. |
# C_2008313EN.01002203.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/22

---

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 3 September 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Health Research Inc

(Case C-452/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 313/36)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 8.12.2007.

1

---