alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SouthCrest
      Financial Group, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      for
      the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “ Periodic
      Report ”),
      the
      undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
      to
      Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his individual knowledge and
      belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 14, 2006




/s/
                Larry T. KuglarLarry
                T. KuglarChief
                Executive Officer****
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 32.2

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Sean S. Sullivan, the Chief Financial Officer of Cenveo, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

    (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

    (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: June 26, 2007                           /S/  SEAN S. SULLIVAN
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                                  Sean S. Sullivan
                                               Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Dwayne Demont HAIZLIP

No. 345P16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 29, 2016

James D. Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Dwayne Dumont Haizlip, for Haizlip, Dwayne Dumont

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 29th of September 2016 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Guilford County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of September 2016."

Ervin, J. recused *247The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of September 2016 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of September 2016."

Ervin, J. recused

**For the Court**
Exhibit 10.58
 AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Amendment Employer Employee
 Agreement
 Board
  1.
    
    Section 2(a)(A) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
 Termination; Severance




---



##### 



2.
    
    Section 2(a)(B) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
 provided
 3.
    
    Section 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
  4.
    
    No Other Amendment. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Agreement shall not be
otherwise amended and remains in full force and effect.




---



##### 



LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANYBy:
    
    /s/ Deirdre Y. GillespieDeirdre Y. GillespiePresident & CEOEXECUTIVE/s/ Gail Sloan

Gail Sloan
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

A.D.H., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 921 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter. 

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
# C_2009044EN.01006801.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/68

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 17 December 2008 — Plant and Others v Commission

(Case T-324/07) (1)

1

(2009/C 44/115)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 20.10.2007.

1

---
# C_2009082EN.01002301.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/23

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 February 2009 — Sara Lee/DE NV v OHIM — Cooperativa italiana di ristorazione (PIAZZA del SOLE)

(Case T-265/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark PIAZZA del SOLE - Earlier national and international word marks PIAZZA and PIAZZA D'ORO - Relative ground for refusal - Lack of likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Lack of similarity of the signs)

(2009/C 82/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sara Lee/DE NV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Hollier-Larousse, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Cooperativa italiana di ristorazione Soc. coop. rl (Reggio d'Emilia, Italy) (represented by: D. Caneva, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 July 2006 (Case R 235/2005-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Sara Lee/DE NV and Cooperativa italiana di ristorazione Soc. Coop. rl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sara Lee/DE NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sara Lee/DE NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 2.12.2006.

1

---
Harrington v. Roeder

441P92-8

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

*509Johnnie L. Harrington, for Harrington, Johnnie L.

Derrick Mertz, Special Deputy Attorney General, Vernon K. Stewart, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of May 2016 by Defendant to Compel:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."

Ervin, J. Recused
State v. Sandra Meshell Brice

244PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 22, 2016.

Mr. Daniel Lawrence Spiegel, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Brice, Sandra Meshell.

Mr. Staples Hughes.

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. Nancy D. Hardison, Ms. Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney Generals, Mr. David Learner, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 19th of December 2016 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of December 2016."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 8th day of February 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
On petition for review filed December 9,1998,

petition for review allowed; decision of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to Court of Appeals for further consideration August 12, 1999

#### Judy M. BRAY, Personal Representative for the Estate of Roy William Bray, *Petitioner on Review, v.*AMERICAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORP., an Oregon corporation, *Respondent on Review, and*Joseph E. WESTON, Marilyn Weston and American Property Management Corp., a general partnership doing business as Weston Investment Co., *Defendants.*

(CC 9504 02768; CA A93122; SC S45970)

984 P2d 854

Maureen Leonard and Dennis H. Elliott, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Thomas M. Christ, Portland, filed the response and memorandum for respondent on review.

Douglas G. Schaller and Marilyn A. Heiken, of Johnson, Clifton, Larson & Corson, P.C., Eugene, filed the brief for *amicus curiae*Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of *Fearing v. Bucher,*328 Or 367, 977 P2d 1163 (1999), and *Lourim v. Swenson,*328 Or 380, 977 P2d 1157 (1999).
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3937 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3937

 To evaluate and report on the feasibility and effectiveness of using 
           natural gas as a fuel source in long haul trucks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2014

   Mr. Graves of Missouri (for himself and Mr. Terry) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
  and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To evaluate and report on the feasibility and effectiveness of using 
           natural gas as a fuel source in long haul trucks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

    It is the policy of Congress that our fuel supply needs to be 
diverse and one method of diversification is the use of natural gas as 
a fuel source in long haul trucks.

SEC. 2. EVALUATION AND REPORT.

    Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Transportation shall--
            (1) appoint representatives from the Department of Energy, 
        the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of 
        Commerce, Members of Congress, State governments, and private 
        sector individuals to evaluate the issues described in 
        paragraph (2); and
            (2) conduct an evaluation and report to Congress on its 
        findings regarding the following:
                    (A) Barriers to transition from diesel fuel to 
                natural gas in long haul trucks.
                    (B) Environmental benefits of using natural gas in 
                long haul trucks.
                    (C) The benefits and drawbacks of using natural gas 
                in long haul trucks.
                    (D) The expected price differential between 
                traditional diesel oems and natural gas oems.
                    (E) Concerns of the participating representatives 
                appointed by the Secretary of using natural gas in long 
                haul trucks.
                    (F) The effect of using natural gas in long haul 
                trucks on the Highway Trust Fund.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``long haul truck'' means a 
commercial vehicle with a 26,000 pound or greater gross vehicle weight 
rating.
                                 <all>
```
mlcg_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 




  





3











  






 





 




  





4











  






 





 




  





5











  






 





 


 


6
Exhibit 10.59
 AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE OFFICER  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Amendment Employer Employee
 Agreement
 Board
  1.
    
    Section 4.3 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
 Annual Bonus
 2.
    
    Section 7.2(a) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
 Severance Package




---



##### 



provided
 3.
    
    Section 7.2(b) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
 (b) Conditions to Receive Severance Package provided
 4.
    
    Section 7.5(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at
the end thereof:The reduction of the amounts payable hereunder, if applicable, shall be made by first reducing the
cash payments pursuant to Section 7.2(a), and in any event shall be made in such a manner so as to
maximize the value of the Severance Package actually paid to the Executive.5.
    
    No Other Amendment. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Agreement shall
not be otherwise amended and remains in full force and effect.




---



##### 



LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANYBy:
    
    /s/ Deirdre Y. Gillespie

Deirdre Y. GillespiePresident & CEOEXECUTIVE/s/ Niv Caviar

Niv Caviar
Joshua Allen Elder, Plaintiff, v. Amber Williams, Defendant, v. Scott M. Johnson, Third-party Intervenor, v. John Allen Elder And Wife Elizabeth Elder, Third-party Intervenors, v. Scott Alan Johnson, Third-party Intervenor.

No. COA16-121

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 6, 2016

DISMISSED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of PureDepth, Inc.
do hereby certify that:





(a) the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PureDepth, Inc. for the three and six months
ended July 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of PureDepth,
Inc.











Dated:
September 15, 2008








/s/
Andrew L. Wood





Mr.
Andrew L. Wood, Chief Executive Officer and Director








/s/
Jonathan J. McCaman





Mr.
Jonathan J. McCaman, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 225/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 225/2014 of 28 February 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Höri Bülle (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 225/2014                     

# of 28 February 2014

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Höri Bülle (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Höri Bülle’ was                              published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Höri Bülle’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.6.****Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed**U.K.

#### GERMANYU.K.

Höri Bülle (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 293, 9.10.2013, p. 16.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6647

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NATHANIEL BURRESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (5:04-cr-00031-FPS-JES-1; 5:05-cv-37-FPSJES)

Submitted: September 23, 2008 Decided: October 3, 2008

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Burress, Appellant Pro Se. Randolph John Bernard,

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 2 

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Burress seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burress has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6574

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JONATHAN TREWAYNE CLANTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (4:05-cr-00031-JLK)

Submitted: September 5, 2008 Decided: October 1, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Trewayne Clanton, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew

Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Trewayne Clanton seeks to appeal the district

court’s order granting a reduction in his sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). In criminal cases, the defendant must

file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of

judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United States v.

Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582

proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period

applies). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable

neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of

up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P.

4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered its order granting a reduction

in sentence on March 25, 2008. Clanton filed the notice of appeal

on April 11, 2008,* after the ten-day period expired but within the

thirty-day excusable neglect period. Because the notice of appeal

was filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case

to the district court for the court to determine whether Clanton

has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension

of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will

then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED
Opinion filed December 16, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-10-00286-CV

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF B.W., A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. FM 51,610

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

 On October 7, 2010, the trial court signed a temporary order following an adversary 

hearing. Gerald Blace West filed a pro se notice of appeal.

 The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services has filed a motion to dismiss on 

the grounds that the October 7 order is not appealable. The clerk of this court wrote West and 

directed him to respond to the motion to dismiss on or before December 6, 2010. West has not 

filed a response.

 The October 7 order is a non-appeable interlocutory order. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §

105.001(e) (Vernon 2008); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014 (Vernon 2008). The 

motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

December 16, 2010 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSterling Gold Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedOctober 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Linda Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 6thday of December, 2007.

LINDA SMITHLinda Smith, President, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer






































---