alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.24

                                    ADDENDUM NO. 1

         THIS ADDENDUM (hereinafter "Addendum No. 1") is made and entered into
between JAVA CENTRALE, INC., a California corporation (hereinafter "Employer")
and BRADLEY B. LANDIN (hereinafter "Employee").

         WHEREAS Employee is employed by Employer in the position of Vice-
President Operations; and

         WHEREAS Employer and Employee executed an Employment Agreement as of
the 1st day of February, 1994 (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS the parties desire to amend the terms of the Agreement:

1.       The term of the Agreement as set out in Article 2 is hereby extended
to January 31, 1999.

2.       The base salary of $80,000 shall remain the same as described in
Article 1(a) of the Agreement, subject to the adjustment agreed in May of 1996,
reducing the base salary to $73,274.

3.       The Employee further agrees that he will, upon the written request of
the Board, sign an Addendum to the Agreement which provides for changes to the
term and compensation, proportional to any such changes agreed to from time to
time by Messrs. R. Shannon, G. Nelson and S. Orlando in their respective
employment agreements with the Employer.

4.       In all other respects the Agreement is hereby confirmed without
amendment.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement at
Sacramento, California as of the 1st day of January, 1997.


                                       JAVA CENTRALE, INC.

                                       Per: /s/ Richard D. Shannon
                                           -------------------------------
                                             Richard D. Shannon, Chairman


                                       /s/ Bradley B. Landin
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       BRADLEY B. LANDIN
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6858

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

TOLLIVER QUACO, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:90-cr-00275-JCC-1; 1:08-cv-00318-JCC) 

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008 

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Tolliver Quaco, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Tolliver Quaco seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. 

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 

683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the 

record and conclude that Quaco has not made the requisite 

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability 

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Robert V. Powell v. P2Enterprises, LLC and Robert Henry Powell

No. 267P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Herman L. Stephens, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Powell, Robert V.

John N. Taylor, Jr., Attorney at Law, John C. Vermitsky, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for P2Enterprises, LLC, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th of July 2016 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 22nd of July 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of ICP Solar Technologies Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ending October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel Cohen, PrincipalAccounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge and belief: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Joel Cohen ------------------------------ Joel Cohen Principal Accounting Officer December 22, 2006 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications areaccompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document. 

----
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Kurt
Streams, certify that:
 
 1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of IGIA, Inc.;
 
 2.    Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
 
 a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;
 
 b)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
 
 c)
    disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5.    The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 Dated:   June
            17, 2005
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/    Kurt
      StreamsKurt
      Streams,
      Chief
      Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. HECTOR SANCHEZ

- SANTILLAN, a.k.a. Miguel Sanchez

- Lopez,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 50035
D.C. No. 3:17

- cr - 02601

- LAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 12, 2018 **
Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. Hector Sanchez

- Santillan appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 24

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 15 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 50035

Sanchez

- Santillan contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the aggravating circumstances identified by the district court were insufficient to justify an upward variance from the Guidelines range and t he district court placed too much weight on his prior domestic violence conviction. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Sanchez

- Santillan’s sentence. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Con trary to Sanchez

- Santilla n’s argument, the district court explicitly and repeatedly stated that it considered his domestic violence conviction to “a lesser extent.” The district court primarily focused on Sanchez

- Santillan’s 17 previous deportations and exclusions , and the failur e of a prior 12

- month

- and

- one - day sentence for his last immigration offense to deter him from returning unlawfully. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, the above

Guidelines sentence is substantive ly reasonable. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51

. AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 06/76-0330] 

Notice is hereby given that SunTx Fulcrum Fund II—SBIC, L.P., 14001 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 111, Dallas, Texas 75240, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) rules and regulations (13 CFR 107.730 (2002)). SunTx Fulcrum Fund II—SBIC, L.P. proposes to invest in Interface Security Systems Holdings, Inc. (“Interface”). The financing will provide the funding for the future acquisitions. 

The financing is brought within the purview of Sec. 107.730(a) and Section 107.730(d) of the Regulations because SunTx Fulcrum Fund, L.P. and SunTx Fulcrum Dutch Investors, L.P., Associates of SunTx Fulcrum Fund II—SBIC, L.P., owns 93.87% of the existing and outstanding ownership of Interface. 

Therefore, this transaction is considered financing of an Associate requiring prior SBA approval. 

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction, within 15 days of the date of this publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416. 

Dated: September 19, 2005. 

Jaime Guzman-Fournier, 

Associate Administrator For Investment. 

[FR Doc. 05-19101 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23-0549 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff andAppellee, vs. MATTHEW JASON WELCH,

Defendant andAppellant.

GRANT Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension oftime until November 27, 2023, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's openingbrief. 10/20/2023 Case Number: DA 23-0549
STATE v. Perry Lyn DUPREE

71P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

Perry Lyn Dupree, for Dupree, Perry Lyn.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of March 2017 by Defendant for Petition for Writ of Prohibition:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136481 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136481 

 COA: 279874 

Wayne CC: 98-007096

NICHOLAS E. SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7029

GREGORY RICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RICHARD BENNETT, Clerk,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:08-

cv-01015-PJM)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 24, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Rice, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Rice appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Rice v. Bennett, No. 8:08-cv-01015-PJM (D. Md.

filed June 2, 2008 & entered June 3, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Nevsun Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cliff T. Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Cliff T. Davis

Cliff T. Davis

Chief Executive Officer



March 25, 2009
STATE v. Tae Kwon HAMMONDS

389A15-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2017

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hammonds, Tae Kwon.

Joseph E. Elder, Assistant Attorney General, Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

John R. Rittelmeyer, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Disability Rights North Carolina, et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 3rd of March 2017 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of March 2017."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 7th day of April 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
State of North Carolina v. Richard Calvin Smith

No. COA16-61

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

NO ERROR.
State of North Carolina v. Jose Merlin Henriquez Portillo

No. 265A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Mr. Michael E. Casterline, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Portillo, Jose Merlin Henriquez.

Ms. Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 12th of July 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              WINSTON HOTELS, INC.
                              List of Subsidiaries


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Jurisdiction of
                                                 Incorporation of              Other Names Under
     Name                                          Organization               Which Doing Business
     ----                                          ------------               --------------------
<S>  <C>                                         <C>                       <C>

1.   Winston Manager Corporation                  Virginia                             N/A

2.   WINN Limited Partnership **                  North Carolina           WINN Limited Partnership of
                                                                                North Carolina (Florida)

                                                                           WINN Operating Limited
                                                                                Partnership (Texas)

                                                                           North Carolina WINN Limited
                                                                                 Partnership (Arizona)

3.   Barclay Hospitality Services Inc. *          North Carolina                       N/A

4.   Winston SPE LLC *                            Virginia                             N/A

5.   Winston Finance LLC *                        Delaware                             N/A

6.   Evanston Hotel Associates, LLC *             Delaware                             N/A

7.   Marsh Landing Hotel Associates, LLC *        Delaware                             N/A

8.   Windsor Hotel Associates, LLC *              Delaware                             N/A

9.   Windsor Lessee Company LLC *                 Delaware                             N/A

10.  Chapel Hill Associates, LLC *                North Carolina                       N/A

11.  Winston Opportunity Management, LLC *        North Carolina                       N/A
</TABLE>



 * These entities are subsidiaries of WINN Limited Partnership.

** Winston Hotels, Inc. was the sole general partner, and owned 95.29%, of
   WINN Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2003.



                                       1
SED HOLDINGS, LLC v. 3 STAR PROPERTIES, LLC, et al.

211PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2016

R. Hayes Hofler, III, Attorney at Law, Keith B. Nichols, Attorney at Law, for 3 Star Properties, LLC, et al.

Douglas W. Hanna, Attorney at Law, Mark R. Sigmon, Attorney at Law, for SED Holdings, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of October 2016 by Defendant-Appellant to Appear:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2016."
City of Greensboro, Plaintiff, v. Alvis Fewell, Defendant.

No. COA16-501

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of CDG Investments Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the financial year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





January 4, 2008

/s/ Gregory Smith

By:  Gregory Smith

Chief Financial Officer