alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Allen Collins, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 11th day of September, 2006.



| | ALLEN COLLINS                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Allen Collins                                      
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
STATE v. Jimmy Allen ROBERTS

79P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

Jimmy Allen Roberts, for Roberts, Jimmy Allen.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*870The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of March 2017 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."

Ervin, J. recused
STATE of North Carolina v. Jesse WILLIAMS

No. 60P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Williams, Jesse.

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

David Kirkman, Assistant Attorney General, Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of February 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."
**Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 November 2008 – Commission v Efrosyni Alexiadou**

**(Case C‐436/07 P)**

Appeal – Arbitration clause – Contract concerning a technological development programme relating to the production of water-repellent leather – Repayment of advance paid – Interest

Appeals – Grounds – Incorrect interpretation and application of provisions of a contract containing an arbitration clause (Art. 238 EC; Statute
of the Court of Justice, Art. 56; Council Decision 1999/169) (see paras 18-26)

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 12 July 2007 in Case T‐312/05 | Commission | v | Alexiadou | [2007] ECR II‐86, in which that Court dismissed an action based on an arbitration clause seeking an order that the defendant reimburse the amount of the advance paid by the Commission under a contract concerning a technological development programme relating to the production of water‐repellent leather (Contract No G1ST‐CT‐2002‐50227). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 12 July 2007 in Case T‐312/05 Commission v Alexiadou [2007], which was notified to the Commission on 18 July 2007; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders that the case be referred back to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders that the costs be reserved. |
# C_2011340EN.01003801.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/38

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Pereira Sequeira v Commission

(Case F-65/06) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Appointment - Internal competition published before 1 May 2004 - Member of the temporary staff appearing on the list of suitable candidates before 1 May 2006 - Grading - Articles 5(4) and 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Secretarial allowance - Action in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)

2011/C 340/76

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rosa Maria Pereira Sequeira (Brussels, Belgium) (represented, initially, by T. Bontinck and J. Feld, lawyers, and subsequently by T. Bontinck and S. Woog, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by J. Currall and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority, notified to the applicant on 19 September 2005, whereby the latter, a member of the temporary staff and a successful candidate in internal competition COM/PC//04, was appointed an official in Grade C*1, pursuant to the provisions of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Each party is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165 of 15.07.06, p. 36.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30741

In Re: In the Matter of the Complaint of LUHR BROTHERS INC,

as Owner of Barges L-1040, L-216, L-1061, L-325, and L-326

Praying for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability

_________________________

LUHR BROTHERS INC, as Owner of Barges L-1040, L-216, L-1061,

L-325, and L-326

Petitioner - Appellee-Cross-Appellant

v.

TERRAL RIVER SERVICES INC

Claimant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee

_________________________

CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant

v.

TERRAL RIVER SERVICES INC

Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges..

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 24, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-30741

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

2

PER CURIAM:*

We have reviewed the briefs, pertinent portions of the record, and the

applicable law and have heard the arguments of counsel. It is clear that the

district court in its able opinion committed no reversible error. Its judgment,

therefore, is AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
# C_2010221EN.01005801.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/58

---

Order of the General Court of 18 June 2010 — Ecolean Research & Development v OHIM (CAPS)

(Case T-452/07) (1)

1

()

2010/C 221/92

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 23.2.2008.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-317-CR

LARRY DALE INGRAM	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 8 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

						----------

	We have considered the “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure.   Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). 							 										PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 16, 2008
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 7, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00082

- CV

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality , Appellant

v.

Union Pacific Railroad Company, Jesse L. Myrow, and Wesley R. Myrow , Appellee s

APPEAL F R OM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on February 23, 2021

. Having

reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

. Therefore, the

C ourt dismisses the appe al for want of jurisdictio n

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to

this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# Official Journal C 278/13 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 278 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4713 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 278

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4713 November 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 278/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 278/2 | Competent national authorities in the cosmetics sector | 2 |
| 2004/C 278/3 | Competent national authorities in the cosmetics sector | 9 |
| 2004/C 278/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3178 — BERTELSMANN/SPRINGER/JV) (
  1
  ) | 23 |
| 2004/C 278/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3553 — LOGISTA/ETINERA/TERZIA) (
  1
  ) | 24 |
| 2004/C 278/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3562 — SPORTFIVE/HSG/JV) (
  1
  ) | 24 |
| 2004/C 278/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3573 — CONOCO/LUKOIL/NMN/JV) (
  1
  ) | 25 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 278/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 278/2

Competent national authorities in the cosmetics sector

2

2004/C 278/3

Competent national authorities in the cosmetics sector

9

2004/C 278/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3178 — BERTELSMANN/SPRINGER/JV) (
  1
  )

1

23

2004/C 278/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3553 — LOGISTA/ETINERA/TERZIA) (
  1
  )

1

24

2004/C 278/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3562 — SPORTFIVE/HSG/JV) (
  1
  )

1

24

2004/C 278/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3573 — CONOCO/LUKOIL/NMN/JV) (
  1
  )

1

25

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | European Personnel Selection Office EPSO |
| 2004/C 278/8 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/B/7/03 | 26 |
| 2004/C 278/9 | Members of the selection board — Open competition EPSO/B/7/03 | 27 |

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office EPSO

2004/C 278/8

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/B/7/03

26

2004/C 278/9

Members of the selection board — Open competition EPSO/B/7/03

27

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 278/10 | Notice | s3 |

2004/C 278/10

Notice

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10662

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ELENO AVILA-RODRIGUEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:07-CR-2-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eleno Avila-Rodriguez

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 30, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10662

2

7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Brandon WILLIAMS

227P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Brandon Williams, Pro Se.

Mr. Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of June 2016 by Defendant for Notice of Removal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
# Official Journal C 35A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.035.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 35A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 576 February 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.035.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 35A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 576 February 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 035A/01 | Directorate-General for Development & Cooperation (EuropeAid) — Publication of a vacancy notice for a Director function (AD 14), in Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2014/10347 | 1 |
| 2014/C 035A/02 | Directorate-General for Development & Cooperation (EuropeAid) — Publication of a vacancy notice for a Director function (AD 14), in Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2014/10348 | 6 |
| 2014/C 035A/03 | Directorate-General for Development & Cooperation (EuropeAid) — Publication of a vacancy notice for a Director function (AD 14), in Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2014/10349 | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2014/C 035A/01

Directorate-General for Development & Cooperation (EuropeAid) — Publication of a vacancy notice for a Director function (AD 14), in Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2014/10347

1

2014/C 035A/02

Directorate-General for Development & Cooperation (EuropeAid) — Publication of a vacancy notice for a Director function (AD 14), in Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2014/10348

6

2014/C 035A/03

Directorate-General for Development & Cooperation (EuropeAid) — Publication of a vacancy notice for a Director function (AD 14), in Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2014/10349

10

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1535.

#### Hutchinson *v.*The State.

Accusation of unlawful sale of liquor, from city court of Hart-well- — -Judge Hodges. October 13, 1908.

Argued January 14,

Decided February 9, 1909.

*A. G. & Julian McCurry,*for plaintiff in error.

*James H.*Shelton, *solicitor,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

1. An admission by the defendant that he had sold intoxicating liquors, without identifying the time and place of the sale, can only be considered as an inculpatory admission, and, as such, does not require a charge to the jury on the law of confessions as laid down in the Penal Code, §§1005, 1006. *Ransom*v. State, 2 *Ga. App.*826 (59 S. E. 101).

2. The admission of irrelevant or hearsay testimony which does not relate to the defendant and can not harm him is ordinarily not ground for reversal.

"3. The evidence in support of the verdict is very weak and barely discernible to judicial scrutiny. But there is some evidence, and the jury and the trial judge thought it sufficient. This court has no discretion in the matter. *Judgment affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4028 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4028

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 2, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 to include the 
  desecration of cemeteries among the many forms of violations of the 
                      right to religious freedom.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Cemeteries are sacred sites that are of great 
        spiritual, cultural, and historical significance to many 
        religious and ethnic groups.
            (2) Congress is committed to protecting and preserving the 
        heritage and sacred sites of national, religious, and ethnic 
        groups, which includes cemeteries in the United States and 
        abroad.
            (3) Cemeteries around the world have and continue to be 
        defaced or destroyed as a direct result of their affiliation 
        with a particular religious or spiritual group.
            (4) Such attacks constitute an assault on the fundamental 
        right to freedom of religion, and are especially egregious when 
        sponsored or tolerated by the local or national governments in 
        the countries in which such offenses occur.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT OF 1998.

    Section 2(a)(4) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 
(22 U.S.C. 6401(a)(4)) is amended in the fourth sentence by inserting 
``desecration of cemeteries,'' after ``confiscations of property,''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 28, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Marlow Williams, Plaintiff, v. Frank L. Perry, in his official capacity as Secretary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety, and Paul G. Butler, Jr., in his official capacity as Chairman of the North Carolina Post-Release supervision and Parole Commission, Defendants.

No. COA16-372

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 38 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 38

To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new Form 1040SR.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2013

Mr. Fleming (for himself and Mr. Barrow) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new Form 1040SR.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seniors' Tax Simplification Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. FORM 1040SR FOR SENIORS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury (or the Secretary's 
delegate) shall make available a form, to be known as ``Form 1040SR'', 
for use by individuals to file the return of tax imposed by chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Such form shall be as similar as 
practicable to Form 1040EZ, except that--
            (1) the form shall be available to individuals who have 
        attained age 65 as of the close of the taxable year,
            (2) the form may be used even if income for the taxable 
        year includes--
                    (A) social security benefits (as defined in section 
                86(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986),
                    (B) distributions from qualified retirement plans 
                (as defined in section 4974(c) of such Code), annuities 
                or other such deferred payment arrangements,
                    (C) interest and dividends, or
                    (D) capital gains and losses taken into account in 
                determining adjusted net capital gain (as defined in 
                section 1(h)(3) of such Code), and
            (3) the form shall be available without regard to the 
        amount of any item of taxable income or the total amount of 
        taxable income for the taxable year.
    (b) Effective Date.--The form required by subsection (a) shall be 
made available for taxable years beginning after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
INN OF THE MOUNTAIN GODS RESORT AND CASINO
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Brian D. ParrishBy:
    
    Brian D. ParrishTitle:
    
    Chief Operating Officer and ManagementBoard Member (Principal Executive Officer)