alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Mission Battleground Park, DST ; Mission Battleground Park Leaseco, LLC, Lessee; LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of CD 2006-CD3 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; and LAT Battleground Park, LLC

No. 361PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Bruce P. Ashley, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Matthew Nis Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Patrick M. Kane, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, for Mission Battleground Park, DST, et al.

Hilda Burnett-Baker, Special Deputy Attorney General, Phyllis A. Turner, Assistant Attorney General, for NC Department of Transportation.

Patrick M. Kane, Greensboro.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th of September 2016 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
State v. John Joseph Carvalho, II

369A15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 20, 2016.

Ms. Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Carvalho, John Joseph (II).

Ms. Mary Carla Babb, Mr. Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney Generals, Mr. Trey Robison, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st of May 2016 by State of NC to Amend the Record on Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of December 2016."
# C_2009006EN.01002602.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/26

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 November 2008 — Weiler v OHIM — IQNet Association — The International Certification Network (Q2WEB)

(Case T-242/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark Q2WEB - Earlier Community word mark QWEB and earlier Community figurative mark QWEB Certified Site - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 6/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Dieter Weiler (Pulheim, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde, V. von Bomhard and A. Renck, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: IQNet Association — The International Certification Network (Berne, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, M. Bucarelli and P. Bodenham, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 March 2007 (Case R 893/2005-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between CISQ Federazione Certificazione Italiana Sistemi di Qualità Aziendali, then IQNet Association — The International Certification Network, and Mr Weiler

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Dieter Weiler to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Dieter Weiler to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on

Briefs A pril 12, 20 05 Session STATE OF TENN ESSEE v. MICHAEL L . CALANDR OS Criminal Court for Sullivan County

No. S41,624

No. E2004-02382-CCA-R3-CD

JUDGMENT Came the appellant, Michael L. Calandr os, pro se , and

also cam e the Attorney Ge neral on behalf of the State of Tennessee, and this case was heard on the record on appeal from the Criminal Courtof Sullivan County; and upon consideration thereof , this Court is of

the opinion tha

t this avenue of appea

l is unava ilable to t he defe ndant bec ause the

sentenc e in this case is neither illegal nor void. I n accord ance wi th the opin

ion filed herein, i

t is, there fore, or

dered a nd adjudg ed by

th i s Courtthat the a

ppeal is d

ismissed, a

nd the ca se is rema

nded to the

Criminal C ourt of Sul livan County for execution

of the judgment of that court and/or for further proceeding s and for collection of costs accrued below. It app earing that the appellant, Michael L . Calandros, is indigent, costs of appeal will b e taxed to the State of Tennessee. Judge John E verett Wil liams Judge Tho mas T. Wooda ll Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
STATE v. Robert Wayne JOHNSON.

No. 14P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Robert W. Johnson, Marion, for Johnson, Robert W.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of January 2016 by Defendant for a Re-Sentencing Hearing:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
# C_2013325EN.01002001.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-3/07) (1)

1

(Cohesion fund - Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 - Environmental infrastructure projects under way in the territory of Andalucia (Spain) - Partial withdrawal of financial assistance - Public works and services contracts - Award criteria - Publicity - Eligibility of expenditure - Determination of the financial corrections - Article H(2) of Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 - Proportionality)

2013/C 325/32

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented: initially by J.M. Rodríguez Cárcamo, then A. Rubio González, lawyers in the State legal service)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by A. Steiblytė and L. Escobar Guerrero, Agents, and by M. Canal Fontcuberta, lawyer, then A. Steiblytė and S. Pardo Quintillán, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 5103 of 20 October 2006 reducing the financial assistance from the Cohesion Fund for five projects being undertaken in the Autonomous Community of Andalucia (Spain).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Articles 2 to 6 Commission Decision C(2006) 5103 of 20 October 2006 reducing the financial assistance from the Cohesion Fund for five projects being undertaken in the Autonomous Community of Andalucia (Spain) in so far as they include an amount of EUR 476 460 by way of financial corrections concerning the projects bearing the references 2000.ES.16.C.PE.004, 2000.ES.16.C.PE.025, 2000.ES.16.C.PE.066 et 2000.ES.16.C.PE.0138; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Articles 2 to 6 Commission Decision C(2006) 5103 of 20 October 2006 reducing the financial assistance from the Cohesion Fund for five projects being undertaken in the Autonomous Community of Andalucia (Spain) in so far as they include an amount of EUR 476 460 by way of financial corrections concerning the projects bearing the references 2000.ES.16.C.PE.004, 2000.ES.16.C.PE.025, 2000.ES.16.C.PE.066 et 2000.ES.16.C.PE.0138;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.

1

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General notice.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations § 111.51(a), the following individual Customs broker licenses and any and all permits have been cancelled due to the death of the broker: Name
License 
                             No.
Port nameThomas A. Borgia
10419
Miami.Karl A. Becnel
09684
New 
                             Orleans.
 Dated: September 8, 2005. Jayson P. Ahern, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.


[FR Doc. 05-18360 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-06-P
State of North Carolina v. Camellia Brown

No. 353P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Ms. Camellia Boyd Norton Brown, Pro Se.

Ms. Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of September 2016 by Defendant for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Dismissed without prejudice by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of September 2016 by Defendant for Preparation of Stenographic Transcript:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th of September 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wake County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of September 2016 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of September 2016 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
ABRONS FAMILY PRACTICE & URGENT CARE, PA, et al. v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

427A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 13, 2017

Camden R. Webb, Attorney at Law, Elizabeth Connolly Stone, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Abrons Family Practice And Urgent Care, PA, et al.

Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, Olga Vysotskaya de Brito, Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.

Jennifer K. Van Zant, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Charles F. Marshall, III, Attorney at Law, Bryan Starrett, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, Bryant C. Boren, Jr., Attorney at Law, Ryan L. Bangert, Attorney at Law, Van H. Beckwith, Attorney at Law, for Computer Sciences Corporation.

Mark S. Thomas, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 9th of February 2017 by Defendant (NCDHHS):

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of February 2017."

Defendant(NCDHHS)shall have up to and including the 29th day of March 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          17,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,705
<PP&E>                                         102,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 456,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          728,135
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,938
<OTHER-SE>                                   (276,792)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   456,281
<SALES>                                         43,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            3,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,710,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,689,664)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,689,664)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
In re: Gutowski

280P15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Michael D. Gutowski, for Gutowski, Michael D., et al.

Mary Anne Gutowski, for Gutowski, Mary Anne.

Emily F. Lowder, Attorney at Law, Michael T. Hosmer, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Jeremy B. Wilkins, Attorney at Law, for Bank of America, N.A.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of August 2015 by Respondents to Enjoin All Other State Actions:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
----

----

**Section906 Certifications**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of **Nevsun Resources Ltd.** (the“Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending **December 31, 2016**, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), **I**, **Clifford T. Davis, Chief Executive Officer**of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: | **February 23, 2017** |
|--------|-----------------------|

|   | ***/s/ Clifford T. Davis***  |
|--------|------------------------------|
| By:    | *__________________________* |

|   | **Clifford T. Davis**Chief Executive Officer** |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of PureDepth, Inc.
do hereby certify that:




(a) the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PureDepth, Inc. for the three months
ended  July 31, 2009(the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(b)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of PureDepth,
Inc.






Dated:  September
14, 2009


/s/
      Andrew L. WoodMr.
      Andrew L. Wood, Chief Executive Officer and Director




/s/
      Joseph A. MoranMr.
      Joseph A. Moran, Chief Financial Officer
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 29 October 2009 – Peek & Cloppenburg v OHIM – Redfil (Agile)**

**(Case T-386/07)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community figurative mark Agile – Earlier Community and national word marks Aygill’s – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 16, 42-44)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 July 2007 (Case R 1324/2006-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Peek & Cloppenburg and Redfil, SL. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Redfil, SL |
| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark Agile for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 28 – Application No 2659456 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Peek & Cloppenburg |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Community and national word mark Aygill’s for goods in Classes 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21 and 24 to 28 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld in its entirety |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Annulment of the Opposition Division’s decision and dismissal of the opposition in its entirety |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 July 2007 (Case R 1324/2006 2); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders OHIM to pay the costs incurred by Peek & Cloppenburg; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders Redfil, SL to bear its own costs. |
In the Matter of Kay Frances Redmond, by and through Linda Nichols, Administratrix of the Estate of Kay Frances Redmond, Claim for Compensation Under the North Carolina Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program

No. 86A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016.

Mr. Edwin A. Pressly, Ms. Elizabeth M. Haddix, Mr. Mark Dorosin, Attorneys at Law, For Nicols, Linda (Administratrix), et al.

Mr. Marc X. Sneed, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, For State of North Carolina

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by State of NC on the 21st of March 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of March 2016 by State of NC to Consolidate Appeals:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 10th day of June 2016.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137177 & (3)(4) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

JAMES K. CHAMPION, 

Plaintiff, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 137177 

 ADB: 08-84-GA 

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because 

the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion for stay of 

proceedings is DENIED as moot. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider adopting an appearance of 

impropriety standard. 

p0916 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 19, 2008 

 Clerk