alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


                           WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.



         The undersigned, duly authorized representative of World Omni Financial
Corp. ("WOFCO"), as Servicer, pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Second Amended and
Restated  Servicing  Agreement dated as of July 1, 1994, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated  Servicing  Agreement  dated  September 23,
1998 and as supplemented by:

          1.  Supplement  1997-A to Servicing  Agreement dated May 1, 1997,
          2.  Supplement  1997-B to Servicing  Agreement dated October 1, 1997,
          3.  Supplement  1998-A to Servicing  Agreement dated October 1, 1998,
          4.  Supplement AL-1997 to Servicing Agreement, dated December 30,
              1997, Amended and Restated as of May 4, 1998,
          5.  Supplement AL-1997-RR to Servicing Agreement, dated December 30,
              1997, Amended and Restated as of May 4, 1998,
          6.  Supplement AL-1998 to Servicing Agreement, dated December 22,
              1998,
          7.  Supplement AL-1998-RR to Servicing Agreement, dated December 22,
              1998,
          8.  and Supplement 1999-A to Servicing Agreement dated August 1,
              1999,

all  between VT Inc.,  as Trustee of World Omni LT and WOFCO,  (as  amended  and
supplemented,  the  "Agreement"),  does  hereby  certify  that a  review  of the
activities  of the  Servicer  during the  period  from  January 1, 1999  through
December 31, 1999, has been made under my supervision with a view to determining
whether  during such period the Servicer has  performed  and observed all of its
obligations under the Agreement.  To the best of my knowledge, no default by the
Servicer under the Agreement has occurred and is continuing.

         Capitalized  terms used but not  defined  herein are used as defined in
the Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this 30th day of March, 2000.


                                    By:________________________________
                                       Name:   Alan J. Browdy
                                       Title:  Vice President Accounting,
                                               Corporate Controller




                                     Page 1
# C_2008209EN.01006604.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/66

---

Order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 19 June 2008 — Lodato Gennaro & C. v Commission

(Case T-417/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 209/119)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 8, 12.1.2008.

1

---
DOT v. ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING OF CHARLOTTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

206PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 18, 2016

Mr. Kenneth A. Sack, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Dahr Joseph Tanoury, Associate *267City Attorney, For Department of Transportation.

Mr. Craig D. Justus, Attorney at Law, For Adams Outdoor Advertising of Charlotte Limited Partnership.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 16th of November 2016 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of November 2016."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 16th day of December 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# C_2019399EN.01003701.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Italia and Eurallumina v Commission

(Joined Cases T-119/07 and T-207/07) (1)

(State aid - Directive 2003/96/EC - Excise duties on mineral oils - Mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production - Exemption from excise duty - Selective nature - Guidelines on national regional aid - Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection of 2001 - Legitimate expectations - Presumption of legality attaching to measures of the institutions - Principle of sound administration - Obligation to state reasons - Contradictory reasoning)

(2019/C 399/43)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant in Case T-119/07: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and G. Aiello and P. Garofoli, avvocati dello Stato)

Applicant in Case T-207/07: Eurallumina SpA (Portoscuso, Italy) (represented by: initially, L. Martin Alegi, R. Denton and E. Cormack, and, subsequently, L. Martin Alegi, R. Denton, A. Stratakis and L. Philippou, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: in Case T-119/07, V. Di Bucci, N. Khan, G. Conte and K. Walkerová, acting as Agents, and, in Case T 207/07, initially, V. Di Bucci, N. Khan, G. Conte and K. Walkerová, and, subsequently, N. Khan and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Applications pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment, in whole or in part, of Commission Decision 2007/375/EC of 7 February 2007 concerning the exemption from excise duty on mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production in Gardanne, in the Shannon region and in Sardinia implemented by France, Ireland and Italy respectively (C 78/2001 (ex NN 22/01), C 79/2001 (ex NN 23/01), C 80/2001 (ex NN 26/01)) (OJ 2007 L 147, p. 29), in so far as it finds that State aid was granted by the Italian Republic, from 1 January 2004, on the basis of the exemption from excise duty on mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production in Sardinia (Italy), and in so far as it orders the Italian Republic to recover the aid or to cancel or suspend its payment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs in Case T-119/07; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs in Case T-119/07;

| 3. | Orders Eurallumina SpA to pay the costs in Case T-207/07. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Eurallumina SpA to pay the costs in Case T-207/07.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 9.6.2007.

---
WALKER v. The N.C. STATE BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS

95PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Ryan McKaig, Attorney at Law, Elizabeth Brooks Scherer, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Walker, Cynthia (D.D.S.).

Carolin Bakewell, Attorney at Law, Matthew W. Sawchak, Attorney at Law, *221Stephen D. Feldman, Attorney at Law, Troy D. Shelton, Attorney at Law, Paul M. Cox, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For The N.C. State Board of Dental Examiners.

Clinton R. Pinyan, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For N.C. Board of Pharmacy.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Two Reply Briefs filed on the 21st of September 2016 by Petitioner:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

Petitioner shall have up to and including the 14th day of October 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Develocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jimmy B. Holton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jimmy B. Holton



Jimmy B. Holton

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

November 16, 2005







1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
     In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofSouthCrest Financial Group, Inc. (the “ Company “) for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004 (the “ Periodic Report “), the undersigned Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of his individual knowledge and belief, that thePeriodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: November 15, 2004 /s/ Douglas J. Hertha   Douglas J. Hertha   Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1****Rule 13a-14 Certification**I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Cronos Group (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 16, 2007/s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ
State of North Carolina v. Rico Lamar Barnes

No. 309A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Ms. Linda B. Weisel, Attorney at Law, For Barnes, Rico Lamar.

Ms. Yvonne B. Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Locke Bell, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 22nd of August 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is *526"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
# C_2008301EN.01001001.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 September 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-368/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2000/59/EC - Port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues - Failure to develop and implement waste reception and handling plans for all ports)

(2008/C 301/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Simonsson and E. Montaguti, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia, Agent, G. Fiengo and F. Arena, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have adopted, within the prescribed time-limit, all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (OJ 2000 L 332, p. 81)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to prepare and adopt waste reception and handling plans for every Italian port, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to prepare and adopt waste reception and handling plans for every Italian port, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 22.9.2007.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2007 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other
securities law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a), or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sensus Metering
Systems (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus Metering Systems Inc.



|                      |  |                                                                           |  |          |  |                                                                          
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DANIEL W. HARNESS |  | /s/ PETER MAINZ                                                          
|Name:                 |  | Daniel W. Harness                                                         |  | Name:    |  | Peter Mainz                                                              
|Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer & President                                       |  | Title:   |  | Chief Operating Officer & Chief
Financial Officer                        
|Company:              |  | Sensus Metering Systems (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus Metering Systems Inc. |  | Company: |  | Sensus Metering Systems (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus Metering Systems Inc.
|Date:                 |  | November 14, 2007                                                         |  | Date:    |  | November 14, 2007
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-91026, 333-16553, 333-03603, 333-40493, 333-60797, 333-75183
and 333-92987) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-19009,
333-28919, 333-38181, 333-40497, 333-48403, 333-65743 and 333-83051) and
related Prospectuses of our report dated January 26, 1998, except for Notes 3
and 4, as to which the date is January 24, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Quintiles Transnational Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 28, 2000
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCT 9, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-10652

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00237-CR-CG

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL LEWIS BENNETT,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(October 9, 2008)

Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Linda Collins Jensen, appointed counsel for Daniel Lewis Bennett, has filed
a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Bennett’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10137 and <greek-i> 10138]


Florida Disaster Number FL-00005

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 4.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1595-DR), dated 07/10/
2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Dennis.
    Incident Period: 07/07/2005 and continuing through 07/20/2005.
    Effective Date: 08/31/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/08/2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/10/2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road Fort 
Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Florida, dated 07/10/2005, is hereby 
amended to re-establish the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning 07/07/2005 and continuing through 07/20/2005.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-18437 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EX-10.99



 Exhibit 10.99 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT 

AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of April 18, 2003, to the Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May     , 1996 (the
“Agreement”) between MONOGRAM CREDIT CARD BANK OF GEORGIA (the “Borrower”) and GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION (the “Lender”). 

WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, the Borrower and Lender desire to amend the Agreement to increase the line of credit available under the
Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 14 of the Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows; 

1. Amendment to Line of Credit of the Agreement. The amount of the line of credit in the first paragraph and in Section 2 of the
Agreement is increased from US$4,000,000,000 to US$15,000,000,000. 
 DATED: As of April 18, 2003 

 

			
	MONOGRAM CREDIT CARD BANK OF GEORGIA
		
	By:	 	 /s/ F. Martin Leary

	Name:	 	F. Martin Leary
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
	
	GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Dennis R. Sweeney

	Name:	 	Dennis R. Sweeney
	Title:	 	Vice President
**Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 May 2008 – Ladbroke and Derby v État belge**

**(Joined Cases C‐231/07 and C-232/07)**

Rules of Procedure – First subparagraph of Article 104(3) – Sixth VAT Directive – Article 13B(d)(3) – Exemptions – Concepts of ‘deposit accounts’ and of ‘payments’ – Refusal of exemption

Tax provisions – Harmonisation of laws – Turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax – Exemptions provided for in the Sixth Directive (Council Directive 77/388, Art. 13B(d)(3)) (see paras 22, 24-25, operative
part)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cour d’appel de Bruxelles – Interpretation of Article 13B(d)(3) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) – Exemptions in relation to transactions, including negotiation, concerning deposit accounts and payments – Bets, lotteries and other games of chance or forms of gambling – Supply of services by intermediaries responsible for collecting the bets on behalf of a principal and, where appropriate, for paying out winnings to bettors – Whether eligible for the exemption provided for in Article 13(B)(d)(3)? |

**Operative part**

The terms ‘transactions, including negotiation, concerning deposit accounts and payments’ used in Article 13B(d)(3) of Sixth
Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes
– Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment are to be interpreted as meaning that they do not refer to
the supply of services by an agent acting on behalf of a client which carries out the activity of accepting bets on horse
races and other sporting events, consisting of acceptance by the agent of bets on behalf of the client, registration thereof,
confirmation to the client, by presentation of the betting slip, that a bet was made, collection of funds, payment of winnings,
the sole assumption of liability as regards the client for the management of the funds collected and for thefts and/or losses
of money and where the agent receives remuneration in the form of commission from the client in return for that activity.
Dennis KENNEDY, Employee, Plaintiff, v. Harris TEETER, Employer, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Carrier (Gallagher Bassett Services, Third-Party Administrator), Defendants.

No. COA16-727

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 21, 2017

AFFIRMED.
State of North Carolina v. Brenda Sanders Lanclos

No. COA16-122

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

NO ERROR.