alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009082EN.01000401.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the House of Lords (United Kingdom)) — Allianz SpA, formerly Riunione Adriatica di Sicurta SpA, Generali Assicurazioni Generali SpA v West Tankers Inc.

(Case C-185/07) (1)

1

(Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Scope of application - Jurisdiction of a court of a Member State to issue an order restraining a party from commencing or continuing proceedings before a court of another Member State on the ground that those proceedings would be contrary to an arbitration agreement - New York Convention)

(2009/C 82/06)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

House of Lords

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Allianz SpA, formerly Riunione Adriatica di Sicurta SpA, Generali Assicurazioni Generali SpA

Appellants:

Respondent: West Tankers Inc.

Respondent:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — House of Lords — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Power of a court of a Member State to order a party not to commence court proceedings or to cease those proceedings in another Member State on the ground that they are contrary to an arbitration agreement

Operative part of the judgment

It is incompatible with Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters for a court of a Member State to make an order to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings before the courts of another Member State on the ground that such proceedings would be contrary to an arbitration agreement.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 7.7.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 11.1


                                  HemaSure Inc.
                 Statement Re Computation of Earnings Per Share



                                             Year ended December 31,
           (In thousands)              1996           1995           1994
                                       ----           ----           ----


Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding              8,069          6,205           4,767

Issuance of cheap stock and cheap
stock equivalents (1)                      -              -              91
                                      ------         ------          ------
Total weighted average number
of common shares outstanding           8,069          6,205           4,858
                                      ======         ======          ======


--------------------
(1)  Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin
     No. 83, common stock, convertible preferred stock and warrants issued at
     prices below the initial public offering price of $7.00 per share ("cheap
     stock") during the twelve-month period immediately preceding the initial
     filing date of the Registration Statement, have been included as
     outstanding from January 1, 1994 to the Company's initial public offering
     in April 1994, which impact is anti-dilutive to the net loss in 1994.





<PAGE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136406 Marilyn Kelly
 

Maura D. Corrigan
 

Robert P. Young, Jr.
 

JAMAL SAFIEDINE, Stephen J. Markman,
 

Plaintiff, Justices 

and 

JSC CORPORATION, MTK FAMILY 

INVESTMENT and MTK FAMILY
 INVESTMENT, LLC, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 136406 

 COA: 272518 

Oakland CC: 2006-072961-CD 

CITY OF FERNDALE,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 1, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we AFFIRM the judgment of the Court of Appeals in 

part, but VACATE, as dicta, the holding that “the [Elliott-Larsen civil rights act, MCL 

37.2101 et seq.,] substantive antidiscrimination provisions that grant rights and 

protections apply only to natural, not juridical, persons.” Safiedine v City of Ferndale, 

278 Mich App 476, 481 (2008). The only issue before the court was whether juridical 

persons could state a cognizable claim for a violation of MCL 37.2302. The court 

correctly held that the corporate plaintiffs, as juridical persons, could not state a claim for 

a violation of § 302 because that section only protects “an individual.” However, 

whether other provisions of the civil rights act permit such claims was not before the 

court. Compare MCL 37.2302 (prohibiting conduct against an “individual”) with MCL 

37.2502(1)(a) (prohibiting conduct against “a person”) and MCL 37.2504(2) (same) and 

with MCL 37.2103(g) (defining a “person” as a “corporation”).

 CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

d0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2008 

 Clerk
<PAGE>


EX-32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I-Element Corporation, Inc. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of I-Element Corporation on Form 10-KSB/A
for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ivan Zweig, Chief Executive
Officer of I-Element Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of INFe-Human
Resources, Inc.

Date: July 10, 2006

/s/ Ivan Zweig
-----------------
Ivan Zweig
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Ivan Zweig
-----------------
Ivan Zweig
Chief Financial Officer
H. R. 4028 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To amend the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 to include the desecration 

of cemeteries among the many forms of violations of the right to religious freedom. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) Cemeteries are sacred sites that are of great spiritual, 

cultural, and historical significance to many religious and ethnic 

groups. 

(2) Congress is committed to protecting and preserving 

the heritage and sacred sites of national, religious, and ethnic 

groups, which includes cemeteries in the United States and 

abroad. 

(3) Cemeteries around the world have and continue to 

be defaced or destroyed as a direct result of their affiliation 

with a particular religious or spiritual group. 

(4) Such attacks constitute an assault on the fundamental 

right to freedom of religion, and are especially egregious when 

sponsored or tolerated by the local or national governments 

in the countries in which such offenses occur. 

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT 

OF 1998. 

Section 2(a)(4) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 

1998 (22 U.S.C. 6401(a)(4)) is amended in the fourth sentence 

by inserting ‘‘desecration of cemeteries,’’ after ‘‘confiscations of property,’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

9-24-2008

Kindler v. Horn

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 03-9010

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Kindler v. Horn" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 434.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/434
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No: 03-9010 and 03-9011

JOSEPH J. KINDLER

 v.

MARTIN HORN, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections;

*DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, Superintendent of the State Correctional

Institution at Graterford; JOSEPH P. MAZURKIEWICZ, Superintendent

of the State Correctional Institution at Rockview,

 Appellants

(*Amended - See Clerk's Order dated 1/6/05)

Argued October 15, 2007

BEFORE: McKEE, FUENTES, and STAPLETON Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Slip Opinion filed in this case filed on

September 3, 2008, be amended as follows:

In the second paragraph on page 15, the sentence which reads: “Accordingly, “the

fugitive forfeiture rule . . . [did] not provide an adequate basis to preclude federal

review of [Kindler’s] habeas claims . . .”.” should be changed to read as follows:

“Accordingly, the district court held that “the fugitive forfeiture rule . . . [did] not

provide an adequate basis to preclude federal review of [Kindler’s] habeas claims

. . .” 

BY THE COURT,

/s/ Theodore A. McKee

 Circuit Judge

DATED: September 24, 2008
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
INN OF THE MOUNTAIN GODS RESORT AND CASINO
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Pamela GallegosBy: Pamela GallegosTitle: Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
IN RE FORECLOSURE OF FRISCIA

246P16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Mr. Christopher Charles Friscia, Pro Se.

Mr. Nathan J. Taylor, Attorney at Law, For Taylor, Nathan J., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of July 2016 by Petitioner for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00530-CV

Terry Christopher Bounds and Diana Bounds, Appellants

v.

Bounds and Pinto Marketing, Inc. d/b/a Canyon Lake Visitors Bureau and

f/k/a/ PBC Marketing Company; Austrends, Inc.; and Randy Osherow,

Trustee of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of Terry Christopher Bounds, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-13-002131, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants Terry Christopher Bounds and Diana Bounds have filed an unopposed

motion to abate this appeal, citing settlement negotiations that might conclude this proceeding and

other related litigation. Appellants request that this Court abate this appeal “until further notice from

the parties.” We will grant the motion to the extent of abating this appeal until March 5, 2014. If

the parties have finalized a settlement by that date, they are instructed to file a motion to reinstate

and dismissthe appeal in accordance with the settlement agreement. If the parties have not finalized

a settlement by that date, they are instructed to file a report informing this Court as to the status of

the appeal and, if applicable, any request to extend the abatement.
__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Goodwin

Abated

Filed: December 5, 2013

2
COPT 06.30.2014 EX 10.2






SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of June 20, 2014, by and between CORPORATE OFFICE PROPERTIES, L.P. (the “Employer”), CORPORATE OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST (the “Company”) and WAYNE H. LINGAFELTER (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Employer, the Company and the Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2008, as amended (the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to Section 11(b) of the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1.Section 4(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the period pursuant to which the Executive or the Employer may provide notice that the Agreement will terminate at the end of the Basic Term, such that either party may provide such notice at any time on or prior to August 1, 2014.  Pursuant to such amendment, if either the Executive or the Employer gives such written notice to the other party on or prior to such date, the Agreement shall terminate at the end of the Basic Term.


2.All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to their respective terms, and nothing contained herein shall be deemed a waiver of any right or abrogation of any obligation otherwise existing under the Agreement except to the extent specifically provided for herein.


3.The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Maryland.


4.This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. 









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
	
		
	“Executive”


/s/ Wayne H. Lingafelter
______________________________
Wayne H. Lingafelter


	 

	“Employer”
Corporate Office Properties L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
By: Corporate Office Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust


/s/ Roger A. Waesche, Jr.
By:  ______________________________
Name: Roger A. Waesche, Jr.
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
	 

	“Company”
Corporate Office Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust


/s/ Roger A. Waesche, Jr.
By:  ______________________________
Name: Roger A. Waesche, Jr.
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Bronson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David M. Bronson                                
|David M. Bronson                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 26, 2006
State of North Carolina v. Nicolas Olivares Pineda

No. COA15-800-2

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

NO ERROR.
In the Matter of: C.A.G.

No. COA16-332

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1113

ADESOLA AYOOLA ONI, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, 

 Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: September 26, 2008 Decided: October 10, 2008 

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Irena I. Karpinski, LAW OFFICES OF IRENA I. KARPINSKI, 

Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant 

Attorney General, Mark C. Walters, Assistant Director, Joanne E. 

Johnson, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Adesola Ayoola Oni, a native and citizen of Nigeria, 

seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

affirming without opinion the decision of the Immigration Judge 

denying his request for a continuance. We have carefully 

reviewed the record and conclude that the decision to deny a 

continuance was not an abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.29 (2008); Onyeme v. INS, 146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir. 

1998). We accordingly deny the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


AHI (Texas) Healthcare Systems, Inc., a CA corporation
AHI Arizona Healthcare Systems, Inc., an AZ corporation
AHI Arizona Holdings, Inc., an AZ corporation
AHI Atlanta Healthcare Systems, Inc., a GA corporation
AHI Downey Healthcare Systems Management, Inc., a CA
    corporation
AHI Florida Healthcare Systems, Inc., a FL corporation
AHI Florida Holdings, Inc., a FL corporation
AHI Gardena Healthcare Systems Management, Inc., a CA
    corporation
AHI Georgia Healthcare Management, Inc., a GA
    corporation
AHI Georgia Healthcare Systems, Inc., a GA corporation
AHI Georgia Holdings, Inc., a GA corporation
AHI Healthcare Systems, Inc., a DE corporation
AHI Kentucky Healthcare Systems, Inc., a KY corporation
AHI LAMN Healthcare Systems Management, Inc., a CA
    corporation
AHI Louisiana Healthcare Systems, Inc., a LA corporation
AHI South Florida Healthcare Systems, Inc., a FL corporation
AHI St. Francis Care Healthcare Systems Management, Inc., a CA corporation
AHI Tennessee Healthcare Systems, Inc., a TN corporation
AHI Whittier Healthcare Systems Management, Inc., a CA corporation
Arizona Managed Care Physicians IPA, Inc., an AZ corporation
Family and Senior Care, Inc., a DE corporation
Family First Medical Centers, Inc., a FL corporation
Foundation Health Medical Services, a CA corporation
FPA-Gonzaba Management Services Organization, Inc., a TX corporation
FPA Acquisition Corporation, a FL corporation
FPA Family Pharmacy, Inc., a FL corporation
FPA Medical Management of Arizona, Inc., an AZ corporation
FPA Medical Management of California, Inc., a DE corporation
FPA Medical Management of Michigan, Inc. dba QualNet of Michigan, a MI
     corporation
FPA Medical Management of South Carolina, Inc., a DE corporation
Health Services Alliance, Inc., a CA corporation
OPSU, Inc. dba Gonzaba Surgical Center (GSC), a TX corporation
Physicians First, Inc., a DE corporation
Physicians Medical Group of Florida, Inc., a FL corporation
PrimeCare, Inc., a NJ corporation
Sterling Anesthesia, Inc., a FL corporation
Sterling Billing Services Corp., a FL corporation
Sterling Healthcare Group, Inc., a FL corporation
Sterling Medical Group of Florida, Inc., a FL corporation
<PAGE>   2
Sterling Medical Group of Michigan, Inc., a FL corporation
Sterling Medical Group, Inc., a FL corporation
Sterling Mednet Administrative Services, Inc., a TX corporation
Sterling Mednet Emergency Services, Inc., a TX corporation
Sterling Miami, Inc., a FL corporation
Sterling Physician Services of America, Inc., a FL corporation
Sterling Physicians Group of Texas, Inc., a TX corporation
Sterling Professional Emergency Physicians, LLC, a MD corporation
Sterling Real Property Melbourne, Inc., a FL corporation
Sterling Regional Emergency Services, Inc., a FL corporation
Sterling Sub Texas, Inc., a TX corporation
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136709 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136709 

 COA: 272218 

St. Clair CC: 05-002849-FC 

KENNETH LEE DANIELS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 29, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
SOUTHERN SHORES REALTY SERVICES, INC. v. William G. MILLER, The Miller Family Limited Partnership II, The Miller Family Limited Partnership III, Old Glory II, LLC, Old Glory III, LLC, Old Glory IV, LLC, Old Glory V, LLC, Old Glory VI, LLC, Old Glory VII, LLC, Old Glory IX, LLC, Old Glory XI, LLC, Old Glory XII, LLC, and Old Glory XIII, LLC

No. 59P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

*754Gregory E. Wills, Attorney at Law, Point Harbor, for Miller, William G., et al.

David P. Ferrell, Attorney at Law, Kevin A. Rust, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Southern Shores Realty Services, Inc.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of February 2017 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."