alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

July 23, 2014

 

CommonWealth REIT
 Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 600
 Chicago, IL 60606



Re: Transaction Agreement dated June 8, 2009

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Government Properties Income Trust (“GOV”) and CommonWealth REIT (f/k/a HRPT Properties Trust) (“CWH”) are parties to a Transaction Agreement dated June 8, 2009 (the “Transaction Agreement”), which provides, inter alia, for a certain right of first purchase in favor of GOV over certain properties of CWH and certain restrictions on each of CWH and GOV with respect to their investment in real property, all as set forth in Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of the Transaction Agreement.  CWH and GOV no longer believe continuation of those rights and restrictions are in their respective best interests and each hereby irrevocably waives its respective rights and releases the other from any obligations thereunder.  Accordingly, effective as of the date hereof, all obligations of CWH and GOV under Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of the Transaction Agreement shall be deemed null and void and of no further force or effect.

 

Please confirm your agreement by signing below and returning a copy of this letter by e-mail and the original by courier to the undersigned.  An executed copy of this letter shall be deemed an original for all purposes.

 

	
 
    	
Very   truly yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Government   Properties Income Trust
    


 

 

	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Mark L. Kleifges 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Mark   L. Kleifges 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief   Financial Officer
    
	
Agreed:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
CommonWealth   REIT
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Orrin S. Shifrin
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Orrin   S. Shifrin
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
EVP,   GC and Secretary
    	
 
    


 

2
STATE of North Carolina v. Martin Terrell LENDER.

No. 539P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Matthew Wunsche, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Martin Lender.

Leonard Green, Assistant Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 6th day of November 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to, dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is *494"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of November 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
# C_2008301EN.01006504.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/65

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 September 2008 — Dow Agrosciences and Others v Commission

(Case T-470/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 301/127)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00488-CV

Christopher Robert Weast

v.

Office of the Attorney General and 

Sarah Reyes

§

§

§

§

From the 325th District Court

of Tarrant County (325-516716-12)

December 18, 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
In the MATTER OF: C.B.

No. COA17-41

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: July 5, 2017

AFFIRMED.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, Bank of New York Mellon v. Margaret Ann REAVES

No. 75P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2017

Margaret Reaves, for Reaves, Margaret Ann.

G. Milam, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 7th of March 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of March 2017 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of March 2017 by Defendant to Extend Time:

*51"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of May 2017."
# C_2009267EN.01006101.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/61

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2009 — Cohausz v OHIM — Izquierdo Faces (acopat)

(Case T-409/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark acopat - Earlier national word marks COPAT - Relative ground for refusal - No genuine use of the earlier marks - Article 56(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2009/C 267/107

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Helge B. Cohausz (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented initially by: I. Friedhoff, lawyer, and subsequently by S. von Petersdorff-Campen and H. Timmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: José Izquierdo Faces (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: H. Bock, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 September 2007 (Case R 289/2006-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Helge B. Cohausz and José Izquierdo Faces.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Mr Helge B. Cohausz to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Helge B. Cohausz to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 8, 12.1.2008.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 185 (Monday, September 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (DMR) 
<greek-i>1203.
    Dates & Times: October 6, 2005; 7:45 a.m.-6:30 p.m. (open 7:45-
12:45, 1:45-5). October 7, 2005; 8 a.m.-3:30 p.m. (closed).
    Place: California State University at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 
CA.
    Type of Meeting: Part open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Thomas P. Rieker, Program Director, 
Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4914.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning progress of the Partnership for Research and Education in 
Materials.
    Agenda: October 6, 2005--Open for Directors overview of the 
Partnership for Research and Education in Materials. October 6 & 7, 
2005--Closed to review and evaluate progress of the Partnership for 
Research and Education in Materials.
    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 20, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-19082 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 7555-07-M
The Fidelity Bank v. NC Department of Revenue

393PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 17, 2017

Donalt J. Eglinton, Attorney at Law, New Bern, Alexander C. Dale, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, Amy P. Wang, Attorney at Law, New Bern, for The Fidelity Bank.

Perry J. Pelaez, Assistant Attorney General, for NC Department of Revenue.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 15th of February 2017 by Respondent:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of February 2017."

Respondent shall have up to and including the 5th day of April 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, DonnaLehmann, as Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of BH/RE,L.L.C. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(A)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(B)  the information in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated: August 14, 2008

 
|        | /S/ Donna Lehmann                                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Donna Lehmann                                            |
|   | Treasurer (Principal  Financial and Accounting  Officer) |

 

----
Kathy Gayle ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hillary Page THOMPSON and Alexis Jackson Thompson, Defendants-Appellants.

No. COA15-704.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Dismissed.
(108 So. 326)

No. 27792.

#### STATE v. ACOSTA.

(March 29, 1926.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

1. Receiving stolen goods <&wkey;8(2) — Evidence of process restoring original number of stolen automobile held properly admitted, though processing was out of presence of accused.

In prosecution for possessing automobile knowing it to have been stolen, evidence of process bringing out original number *held*properly admitted, though processing was done out of presence of accused.

2. Criminal law <&wkey;935(l) — Bill of exceptions to refusing new tria!, sought because verdict was contrary to law and evidence and because evidence was insufficient, held without merit.

Bill of exceptions to action of judge a quo in overruling motion for new trial, sought on ground that verdict was contrary to law and evidence and that evidence was insufficient *held.*without merit.

Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; A. D. Henifiques, Judge..

Emanuel Acosta was convicted of possessing property knowing same to have been stolen, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Prentice E. Edrington, Jr., and William J. 'O’Hara, Jr., both of New Orleans, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., and Henry Mooney, Dist. Atty., and Eugene Stanley, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of New Orleans, for the State.

LAND, J.

Defendant was convicted and sentenced under a charge of having in his possession a Ford coupé, knowing the same to have been previously stolen.

On the trial of the case, it developed from the evidence that the stolen automobile bore the mutilated number 7085761, and that, by the use of a secret process, the original number 8016551 had been restored by the police department of-the city of New Orleans.

[1 ] The state witness having testified to the accuracy of the test and the result, defendant’s counsel objected *to the*evidence on the ground that the processing had been done out of the presence of the accused. This objection was overruled.

1. The ruling of the trial judge is clearly correct for the apparent reason that the objection went rather to the effect than to the admissibility of the evidence. The state witness did not testify to any statement made out of the presence of the accused, but to a fact within his own knowledge, and which had been ascertained as a result of a process used by the witness.

[2] 2. The other bill of exceptions reserved by defendant is without merit, as it was taken to the action of the judge a quo in overruling a motion for a new trial, based on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, the insufficiency of the evidence, and the fact that the processing was done out of the presence of the accused.

We have already disposed of the last point made in the motion for a new trial adversely to the contention of the defendant, and said motion otherwise presents no question of law for review by this court.

The conviction and sentence are therefore affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.26

                          Amendment to Employment Agreement
                               Effective March 31, 1997
                    Between Java Centrale, Inc. and Steven Orlando
                                           
                                           
Java Centrale, Inc. ("Java") and Steven Orlando ("SJO") agree that the salary
due to SJO for the position of Chief Financial Officer is deferred for a period
of 90 days and due June 30, 1997.  Java and SJO agree that the salary due SJO
for the period of December 1, 1996 to March 31, 1997 in the amount of $27,291.97
is deferred until June 30, 1997.  Java agrees that the credit line dated July
11, 1996, in the amount of $175,000, signed by SJO, Gary Nelson and Baycor
Ventures, Inc. is terminated and that by SJO deferring salary of $27,291.97 by
SJO that Java fully releases SJO of any obligation under this credit line and
there are no further obligations by SJO to loan funds under that credit line
dated July 11, 1996.



Agreed to:


/s/
Steven Orlando


/s/
Gary Nelson, President

/s/
Rick Shannon, Chairman of the Board
Taylor v. Lewis

301P16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 29, 2016

Michael Anthony Taylor, for Taylor, Michael Anthony.

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of December 2016 by Petitioner for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of December 2016."
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      J.
      Stewart Asbury III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
      ended July 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of Chatsworth Data Solutions,
      Inc.


Date:
                  September 19, 2007
                
                /s/
                  J. Stewart Asbury IIIJ.
                  Stewart Asbury IIIChief
                    Executive Officer and President
    I,
          Clayton Woodrum, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
          pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
          Report of Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
          quarter
          ended July 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
          in
          such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
          the financial condition and results of operations of Chatsworth Data Solutions,
          Inc.


Date:
                  September 19, 2007
                
                /s/
                  Clayton WoodrumClayton
                  WoodrumChief
                    Financial Officer
In the 

Indiana Supreme Court 

STATE of Indiana 

 Appellant, 

 v. 

Shannon HOLLARS, 

Appellee. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Supreme Court Cause No. 

12S02-0808-CR-477 

Court of Appeals Cause No. 

12A02-0711-CR-979 

Clinton Superior Court Cause No. 

12D01-0412-FA-180 

ORDER VACATING PRIOR ORDER GRANTING TRANSFER

 By order dated August 28, 2008, the Court granted a petition seeking transfer of 

jurisdiction over this appeal from the Court of Appeals to this Court. After further review, 

including oral argument, a majority of the Court has determined that transfer was improvidently 

granted. 

 Accordingly, the order granting transfer is VACATED. The Court of Appeals opinion 

reported as State v. Hollars, 887 N.E.2d 197 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008), is no longer vacated under 

Appellate Rule 58(A) and is REINSTATED as Court of Appeals precedent. 

 The transfer petition filed by Appellee Hollars is DENIED. 

 Pursuant to Appellate Rule 58(B), this appeal is at an end. The Court DIRECTS the 

Clerk to certify this order as final and to send copies of this order to the Hon. Kathy R. Smith, 

Judge, Clinton Superior Court; Hon. John G. Baker, Chief Judge, Indiana Court of Appeals; 

Steve Lancaster, Court of Appeals Administrator; and all counsel of record. 

The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to LexisNexis and to 

West Group for publication on-line and in the bound volumes of this Court's decisions. 

Done at Indianapolis, Indiana, this 20th day of October, 2008. 

/s/ Randall T. Shepard 

Chief Justice of Indiana 

Shepard, C.J., and Dickson, Boehm, and Rucker, JJ., concur and vote to deny transfer. 

Sullivan, J., dissents, and votes to grant transfer.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7481** 

JORGE GEVARA , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.

F. B. HUBBARD, Superintendent; CRUTCHFIELD, Assist. Superintendent of Programs; DEBRA DUNCAN, R.N.

- Medical Administ rator; C. FIELDS, Correctional Officer; DAVID OSTORNE, Asst. Director Prisons; PAULA Y. SMITH, Medical Director of Prisons; THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Prisons; D. JONES MURPHY, Nurse; AMY S. MACKEY; PETER KEYSER; MR. PERRITT, Unit Manager; T. JONES, Asst. Unit Manager; P. BETHEA, Correctional Officer; PURCEL, Correctional Officer; QUICK, Sergeant; MILLER, Sergeant; ASHE HARRIS, Notary Public; DIRECTOR OF PRISONS BOYD BENNETT , Defendants

– Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court f or the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. William L. Osteen, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cv
- 00681

- WO

- LPA )

Submitted : January 13, 2011 Decided: January 21, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un publi shed per curiam opinion

.

Jorge Gevara, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Jorge Gevara seeks to appeal the district court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to
deny Gevara’s “Motion to Amend an Order to Show Cause and for an
Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order and Appointment of
Counsel as a Support of Any Error and Objections to the
Magistrate’s Opinion & Order.” This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial In dus.
Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 4 7 (1949). The order Gevara seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Gevara’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss
the appeal fo r lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                            2318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    31602
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1651
<INVENTORY>                                      31702
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 66213
<PP&E>                                          200949
<DEPRECIATION>                                   80944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  255317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            61451
<BONDS>                                         323298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      16801
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                    (137164)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    255317
<SALES>                                         271830
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           199227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   243228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   875
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               35555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (249)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7570)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7570)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>