alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004084EN.01021401.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/214 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/214

---

(2004/C 84 E/0258)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2374/03

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 July 2003)

Subject:   Contracting and subcontracting by the Commission

Subject:

In view of the recent OLAF investigation into the alleged misappropriation of about EUR 900 000 by senior Eurostat staff, the fact that the Commission has launched a reform of the accounting system, which is deemed to be inadequate, and that Eurostat subcontracted services to Eurogramme, Eurocost and Planistat, can the Commission specify what services have been contracted out and subcontracted in the last five years, how much they cost, and what the mechanisms for allocating contracts and selecting successful contractors are?

Supplementary answer given by Ms Schreyer on behalf of the Commission

(24 February 2004)

(24 February 2004)

| 1. | The OLAF investigations are into an allegation that Eurostat was keeping accounts outside the official accounting system. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The OLAF investigations are into an allegation that Eurostat was keeping accounts outside the official accounting system.

| 2. | The reform of the accounting system — in line with the new Financial Regulation — is proceeding according to schedule. It has the full support of the ECA and will put the Commission at the forefront of modern public-sector accounting practices. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The reform of the accounting system — in line with the new Financial Regulation — is proceeding according to schedule. It has the full support of the ECA and will put the Commission at the forefront of modern public-sector accounting practices.

| 3. | The contracting-out of services is dealt with in the Financial Regulation. The IAS has looked into the contracts. As regards the number of contracts, the Commission would refer to Written Questions P-3457/02 by Mr Heaton-Harris (1), P-l 705/03 by Ms Stauner (2), P-l 724/03 by Mr Blak (3), P-l 807/03 by Mr Bösch (2), P-1890/03 by Mr Heaton-Harris (4), P-1978/03 by Ms Stauner (2) and P-2453/03 by Mr Meijer (5) and information sent direct to Parliament in 2003. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The contracting-out of services is dealt with in the Financial Regulation. The IAS has looked into the contracts. As regards the number of contracts, the Commission would refer to Written Questions P-3457/02 by Mr Heaton-Harris (1), P-l 705/03 by Ms Stauner (2), P-l 724/03 by Mr Blak (3), P-l 807/03 by Mr Bösch (2), P-1890/03 by Mr Heaton-Harris (4), P-1978/03 by Ms Stauner (2) and P-2453/03 by Mr Meijer (5) and information sent direct to Parliament in 2003.

1

2

3

2

4

2

5

---

(1)  OJ C 137 E, 12.6.2003.

1

(2)  OJ C 70 E, 20.3.2004, p. 58.

2

(3)  OJ C 58 E, 6.3.2004, p. 89.

3

(4)  OJ C 51 E, 26.2.2004, p. 153.

4

(5)  OJ C 65 E, 13.3.2004, p. 156.

5

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Ali Mahamed SHEIKH and Abdulkadir Sharif Ali, Defendants.

No. COA15-688.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
State of North Carolina v. Robert Lee Nichols

No. 357P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Amanda S. Zimmer, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Nichols, Robert Lee.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th of September 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
EXHIBIT
32.1
  
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Vanguard Minerals Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vladimir Fedyunin, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/ Vladimir
      FedyuninDate:  
      November 3, 2008
              Vladimir
      Fedyunin
                Chief
      Executive Officer
 
  
  EXHIBIT
32.2
  
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Vanguard Minerals Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vladimir Fedyunin, in my capacity as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/ Vladimir
      FedyuninDate:  
      November 3, 2008
              Vladimir
      Fedyunin
                Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 10.37







 


 





AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
FOR THE SUBSCRIPTION OF SHARES


 


This Amendment to Agreement
for the Subscription of Shares (this “Amendment”) is dated July 24, 2014, and amends the Agreement for the Subscription
of Shares (the “Agreement for Subscription”), dated as of May 20, 2014, between SurePure, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Corporation”), and Trinity Asset Management (Proprietary) Limited, a company formed under the laws of South Africa
(Company Number: 1996/010864/07) (the “Manager”). Capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition
shall have the respective meanings given them in the Agreement for Subscription.


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Manager have entered into the Agreement for Subscription, under which the Manager agreed to provide Offers to Purchase
for the Offered Shares;


 


WHEREAS, in the Agreement
for Subscription the Manager agreed that it would perform its obligations by July 30, 2014;


 


WHEREAS, as of the
date of this Amendment, the Manager has not provided any Offers to Purchase but has in good faith requested that the Corporation
extend the Termination Date to September 30, 2014 to provide the Manager with additional time to perform its obligations under
the Agreement for Subscription; and


 


WHEREAS, the board
of directors of the Corporation has determined that it would be in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders for
the Manager to be granted additional time in which to perform its obligations under the Agreement for Subscription.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, IN
CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Corporation and the Manager agree as follows:


 


1.             The definition of Termination Date in Section 1.1 of the Agreement for Subscription is hereby amended to be September 30, 2014.


 


 


2.             The definition of Transfer Agent in Section 1.1 of the Agreement for Subscription is hereby amended to read in full as follows:


 


“Transfer Agent” means Vstock
Transfer, LLC, the current transfer agent of the Corporation, with a mailing address of 18 Lafayette Place, Woodmere, NY 11598,
United States of America, and any successor transfer agent of the Corporation.


 


3.             The Agreement for Subscription shall remain unmodified and unamended in all other respects.


 



    	 



    	 



    




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to Agreement for the Subscription of Shares to be duly executed by their respective
authorized signatories as of the date first indicated above.


 





	 	SUREPURE, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/Stephen M. Robinson
	 	 	Name: Stephen M. Robinson
Title: Chief Financial Officer



 





	 	TRINITY ASSET MANAGEMENT (PROPRIETARY)
        LIMITED
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/Quinton George
	 	 	Name: Quinton George
Title: Director
STATE of North Carolina v. Brandon Collin MARTIN, Defendant.

No. COA15-294.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 1, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
# C_2010234EN.01005301.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/53

---

Order of the General Court of 29 June 2010 — Bavaria v Council

(Case T-178/06) (1)

1

()

2010/C 234/93

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 224, 16.9.2006.

1

---
# C_2008301EN.01003102.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/31

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Helkon Media v Commission

(Case T-122/06) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audio-visual works (MEDIA Plus) - Demand for payment of financial aid - Existence of an arbitration clause - Compensation - Admissibility)

(2008/C 301/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Helkon Media AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: U. Karpenstein, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Wilms and I. Kaufmann-Bühler, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action under Article 238 EC for an order that the Commission pay to the applicant a sum allegedly owed under a contract relating to Community support for the project ‘DARK BLUE WORLD’ (Project no. 2002-4212-0103DI010006DE).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Helkon Media AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Helkon Media AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 154, 1.7.2006.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6286

TYRONE L. KNIGHT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:07-cv-00694-LMB-BRP)

Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: September 23, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone L. Knight, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory William Franklin,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone L. Knight seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.

2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Knight has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Globetel  Communications  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Thomas Y. Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Thomas Y. Jimenez
                                         -------------------------
                                         Thomas Y, Jimenez
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         March 31, 2006


                                  END OF FILING
In the Matter of X.D.G. and X.A.I.G.

No. COA15-1288.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# C_2009267EN.01001401.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/14

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH

(Case C-520/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Restructuring aid - Decision ordering the recovery of aid incompatible with the common market - Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Joint and several liability)

2009/C 267/23

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Gross and B. Martenczuk, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH (represented by: Th. Lübbig and M. le Bell, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 12 September 2007 in Case T-196/02 MTU Friedrichshafen v Commission, in which the Court of First Instance annulled Article 3(2) of Commission Decision 2002/898/EC of 9 April 2002 on the State aid implemented by Germany for SKL Motoren- und Systembautechnik GmbH, in so far as it orders MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH to repay jointly and severally a sum of EUR 2,71 million — Limits and conditions on the application of Article 13(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999, allowing the Commission to adopt a final decision finding aid to be incompatible with the common market on the basis of the information available if a Member State fails to comply with an information injunction

MTU Friedrichshafen

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 26.1.2008.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

The Board of Directors
Travelers Property Casualty Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Travelers Property Casualty Corp.:

-     Form S-8  Nos. 333-98365 and 333-84740

of our reports dated January 23, 2003 with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Travelers Property Casualty Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), changes
in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, and all related schedules, which reports appear
in the December 31, 2002 Form 10-K of Travelers Property Casualty Corp. Our
reports refer to changes in the method of accounting for goodwill and other
intangible assets in 2002 and its methods of accounting for derivative
instruments and hedging activities and for securitized financial assets in 2001.


/s/ KPMG LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
March 4, 2003
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 2 December 2008 – Ebro Puleva v OHIM – Berenguel (BRILLO’S)**

**(Case T-275/07)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark BRILLO’S – Earlier national figurative marks featuring the word element ‘brillante’ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 24, 28)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2007 (Case R 493/2006-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Ebro Puleva, SA and Luis Berenguel, SL. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Luis Berenguel, SL |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark BRILLO’S for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 31 – Application No 2984995 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Ebro Puleva, SA |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Spanish figurative marks ‘brillante’ for goods in Class 30 (Mark No 922772) and in Class 29 (Mark No 2413459) |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition dismissed; |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Ebro Puleva, SA to pay the costs. |
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SouthCrest Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “ Periodic Report”), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his individual knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 
 Dated: August 14, 2009
 /s/ Douglas J. HerthaDouglas J. Hertha
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GigaBeam
      Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”),
      the undersigned as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby, certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of
                1934:and




(ii)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Louis S.
      Slaughter


Name:
      Louis S. Slaughter


Chief
      Executive Officer


Date: May
      15, 2006


40
# C_2008116EN.01000702.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 March 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia Amministrativa per la Regione siciliana (Italy)) — Ispettorato Provinciale dell'Agricoltura di Enna, Assessorato all'agricoltura e foreste della Regione Sicilia, Regione Sicilia v Domenico Valvo

(Case C-78/07) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Regulations (EEC) No 2328/91 and (EC) No 950/97 - Articles 17 and 18 - Compensatory allowances for permanent natural handicaps - Farmers receiving length-of-service pensions - Right to compensatory allowances - Limits)

(2008/C 116/12)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Giustizia Amministrativa per la Regione siciliana

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Ispettorato Provinciale dell'Agricoltura di Enna, Assessorato all'agricoltura e foreste della Regione Sicilia, Regione Sicilia

Applicants:

Defendant: Domenico Valvo

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consiglio di Giustizia Amministrativa per la Regione siciliana — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 950/97 of 20 May 1997 on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures — National legislation refusing to grant the compensatory allowance for permanent natural handicaps to farmers in receipt of a length-of-service pension

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 17 and 18 of Council Regulation (EC) No 950/97 of 20 May 1997 on improving the efficiency of agricultural structures confer on Member States the right to grant a compensatory allowance to a farmer who fulfils the conditions laid down in those two articles. However, those articles do not preclude a Member State from refusing payment of such an allowance where that farmer is in receipt of a pension, in particular, a length-of-service pension.

---

(1)  OJ C 117, 26.5.2007.

1

---
State of North Carolina v. Clairy Kanyinda Mbaya

No. 400P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 15, 2016.

Mr. James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, For Mbaya, Clairy Kanyinda.

Ms. Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law.

Ms. Margaret A. Force, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of October 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."