alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,446
<SECURITIES>                                       978
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     52,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          38,630
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,785
<BONDS>                                            529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           202
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,607
<SALES>                                          7,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,799
<CGS>                                            3,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (461)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,962
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,342
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,620
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
# C_2008008EN.01003201.xml

| 12.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/32

---

Action brought on 31 October 2007 — Menidiatis v Commission

(Case F-128/07)

(2008/C 8/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Andreas Menidiatis (Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the Commission decision of 21 December 2006 rejecting the applicant's candidature for the vacant post of head of representation of the Commission to Greece and appointing another candidate to that post; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission decision of 21 December 2006 rejecting the applicant's candidature for the vacant post of head of representation of the Commission to Greece and appointing another candidate to that post;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant relies on a number of pleas in law against the decision to reject his candidature for the vacant post of head of representation of the Commission to Greece. First, he pleads that the selection procedure was unlawful and not complied with. Secondly, he pleads that the notice of vacancy was unlawful and not complied with.

A further plea in law alleges infringement of Article 11a of the Staff Regulations. Moreover, the applicant pleads the unlawfulness of the downgrading of the post of head of representation in Athens and the unlawfulness of the decision of 7 July 2004 concerning the detailed rules for filling head-of-representation posts.

In addition, the lateness of the publication of the notice of vacancy is relied on along with the failure to state reasons for refusing access to the documents requested by the applicant in his complaint. Finally, the applicant relies on the breach of the rules concerning the rotation of staff occupying ‘sensitive posts’ and submits that there are numerous factors indicating a misuse of powers.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             792
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         257,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                           162
<OTHER-SE>                                     268,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,878
<SALES>                                         10,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,406
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,379
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,379
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Didsbury, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in such Annual Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of DARA BioSciences, Inc.



By:

/s/ John DidsburyName:

John DidsburyTitle:

President and Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 31, 2008


I, John C. Thomas, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and
that information contained in such Annual Report of DARA BioSciences, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of DARA BioSciences, Inc.



By:

/s/ John C. Thomas, Jr.Name:

John C. Thomas, Jr.Title:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 31, 2008
# C_2009180EN.01001001.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-561/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2001/23/EC - Transfers of undertakings - Safeguarding of employees’ rights - National legislation providing for non-application to transfers of undertakings in ‘critical difficulties’)

2009/C 180/15

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and L. Pignataro, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: R. Adam, Agent, and by W. Ferrante, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16) — National legislation providing for the non-application of Articles 3 and 4 of the directive to transfers of undertakings in a ‘situation of crisis’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by maintaining in force the provisions of Article 47(5) and (6) of Law No 428 of 29 December 1990 where an undertaking is in critical difficulties within the meaning of subparagraph (c) of the fifth paragraph of Article 2 of Law No 675 of 12 August 1977 so that the rights of employees set out in Articles 3 and 4 of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses are not safeguarded in the event of the transfer of an undertaking which has been declared to be in critical difficulties, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by maintaining in force the provisions of Article 47(5) and (6) of Law No 428 of 29 December 1990 where an undertaking is in critical difficulties within the meaning of subparagraph (c) of the fifth paragraph of Article 2 of Law No 675 of 12 August 1977 so that the rights of employees set out in Articles 3 and 4 of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses are not safeguarded in the event of the transfer of an undertaking which has been declared to be in critical difficulties, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.

1

---
Robert E. King and wife, Jo Ann O'Neal v. Michael S. Bryant, M.D., and Village Surgical Associates, P.A.

No. 294PA14

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016.

O. Drew Grice, Jr. Attorney at Law, Robert D. Walker, Jr., Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, Alexandra Couch, Attorney at Law, for Bryant, Michael S. (M.D.), et al.

Mark A. Sternlicht, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, for King, Robert E., et al.

Matthew D. Ballew, Attorney at Law, Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

*ORDER*

On 21 August 2015, this Court certified this case to the trial court for additional findings of fact as to "[w]hether a physician-patient relationship existed at the time Mr. King signed the arbitration agreement." On 6 November 2015, the trial court entered additional findings of fact.

On 22 February 2016, this Court ordered the parties to submit supplemental briefs addressing the effect, if any, of the trial court's additional findings of fact on the proceedings in this case. Appellants and Appellees submitted supplemental briefs on 21 March 2016 and 18 April 2016, respectively.

The Court, on its own motion, now orders that this case be set for oral argument.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 9th day of June, 2016.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18334]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, October 7, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-18334 Filed 9-12-05; 11:52 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Amanda Gayle REED

No. 331A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 21, 2016

Matthew C. Coxe, Attorney at Law, for Reed, Amanda Gayle.

Melody R. Hairston, Assistant Attorney General, Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 6th of September 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of October 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Wilkes v. City of Greenville

368PA15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 28, 2016

Anita B. Hunt, Attorney at Law, Durham, Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Wilkes, Johnnie.

Matthew P. Blake, Attorney at Law, Cary, for City of Greenville, et al.

J. William Crone, IV, Attorney at Law, J. Timothy Wilson, Attorney at Law, Bruce A. Hamilton, Attorney at Law, Tracey L. Jones, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Allison B. Schafer, Legal Counsel/Director of Policy, Christine Teresa Scheef, Attorney at Law, Kimberly S. Hibbard, General Counsel, for N.C. Association of Self-Insurers, et al.

M. Duane Jones, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Angela Farag Craddock, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys, et al.

Kathleen G. Sumner, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, David P. Stewart, Attorney at Law, for Workers' Injury Law & Advocacy Group.

E. Stewart Poisson, Attorney at Law, Vernon Sumwalt, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of July 2016 by NC Advocates for Justice for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of July 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i)
STATE of North Carolina v. Matthew Robert LUKE.

No. COA15-241.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 20, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
Enertopia Corp: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com








Mr. Jeff Paikin 
400-69 John St. South 
Hamilton, ON L8N
2B9 
P - 905-777-0000 


June 17, 2014 

Dear Mr. Paikin, 

This letter confirms your appointment to, and your acceptance
of, your role as a member of Enertopia Corp.'s Advisory Board for a period of
not less than one year, but to be determined by certain performance thresholds
as noted below.

As an advisor to Enertopia Corp, you agree to make available to
the Board of Directors of Enertopia and to myself as President/CEO of Enertopia,
your time and expertise as required to assist us to evaluate opportunities and
procedures in the legal marijuana sector. We would expect your expertise in the
areas of project evaluation; building selection; finance and such other areas as
you feel best represent your abilities. 

In return for your agreeing to assist us in this manner, we
will pay to you the following schedule of compensation for your participation on
our Advisory Board, to a total of 1,350,000 restricted common shares. Any/all
shares issued must be in compliance with all Canadian and US regulations, and
you must remain a member of our Advisory Board at the time of each compensation
award. 

The table below represents milestones to be achieved at the
building location known to you and to Enertopia Corp, but not disclosed herein
due to reasons of competitiveness within the industry. It is understood that the
plant will be outfitted and designed to produce medical marijuana under Health
Canada’s MMPR program. 


	Shares On
      
Signing 	Shares On
Municipal 

    Approval 	Shares on 

    Health Canada 
“Comfort
      Letter” 	Shares On

 Health Canada 

    Approval 	Shares on 
First Harvest 	Shares on

 $5,000,000 in 

    Plant Revenue 
	90,000
      
(Paid) 	135,000
      	270,000
      	315,000
      	270,000
      	270,000
      












We very much appreciate your time and expertise and believe you can make a valuable contribution to Enertopia's success.


If this is acceptable to you, please sign this letter as specified below, and return to me via scan at mcallister@enertopia.com or kameo300@gmail.com at your earliest convenience. 


Yours Truly, 


Robert McAllister 

President / CEO 

Enertopia Corp 




________________________
 Accepted: Jeff Paikin
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                          2,497,995
<SECURITIES>                                    4,610,336
<RECEIVABLES>                                     455,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                7,041,520
<PP&E>                                             50,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,259,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          31,261,093
<BONDS>                                        13,437,807
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        5,512,480
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,952,317)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,259,646
<SALES>                                        11,009,722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,200,834
<CGS>                                          10,821,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,340,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  547,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                8,852,048
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,448,907)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,794,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,794,403)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (1.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.28)


</TABLE>
Murray v. University of NC at Chapel Hill

124A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Laura H. McHenry, Assistant Attorney General, Kimberly D. Potter, Special Deputy Attorney General, Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, for University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill.

Henry Clay Turner, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Murray, Jillian.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of October 2016 by State of NC for Withdrawal of Counsel:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Florida Disaster # FL-00009]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration  of a disaster for the State of Florida dated 9/14/2005. Incident: Hurricane Katrina. Incident Period: 8/25/2005.
 EFFECTIVE DATE: 9/14/2005. Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/14/2005. EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 6/14/2006.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Monroe. Contiguous Counties: Florida: Collier, Miami-Dade. The Interest Rates are: PercentHomeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.375Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.687Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.557Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.750Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10198 8 and for economic injury is 10199 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # are Florida. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: September 14, 2005. Hector V. Barreto, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 05-19242 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Pamela Marie HAIZLIP.

No. COA15-886.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Prejudicial Error.