alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICP SolarTechnologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Sass Peress, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Sass Peress  ------------------------------ Sass Peress Chief Executive Officer December 22, 2006 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications areaccompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document. 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Donna Lehmann, asTreasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of BH/RE, L.L.C. (the “Company”),certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(A)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(B)  the information in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 14, 2008 |                                                    |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |                                                    |
|                               | /S/ Donna Lehmann                                       |
|                               | Donna Lehmann                                           |
|                               | Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer) |

 

----
State of North Carolina v. Tramon C. Williams, Defendant.

No. COA16-514

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4070 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4070

   To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from regulating 
   certain network management practices of broadband Internet access 
                           service providers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 21, 2014

Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. Cramer, 
Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Scalise, and Mr. Latta) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from regulating 
   certain network management practices of broadband Internet access 
                           service providers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Internet Freedom Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF FCC.

    (a) In General.--The regulations adopted by the Federal 
Communications Commission in the Report and Order in the matter of 
preserving the open Internet and broadband industry practices (FCC 10-
201; adopted December 21, 2010) shall have no force or effect, and the 
Commission may not reissue such regulations in substantially the same 
form, or issue new regulations that are substantially the same as such 
regulations, unless the reissued or new regulations are specifically 
authorized by a law enacted after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
    (b) Exception.--This section does not apply to any regulations that 
the Federal Communications Commission determines necessary--
            (1) to prevent damage to the national security of the 
        United States;
            (2) to ensure the public safety; or
            (3) to assist or facilitate any actions taken by a Federal 
        or State law enforcement agency.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 3.1**

AMENDMENT TO THE BYE-LAWS 

OF 

SENSUS (BERMUDA 2) LTD. 

Adopted by 

Joint Unanimous Written Resolutions of the Board and Directors and Sole Member 

on October 22, 2009 

1. The name “Sensus Metering Systems (Bermuda 2) Ltd.” is hereby deleted in each and every instance in which it appears in the Bye-laws and replaced in each such instance with “Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd.” 

2. Except as specifically set forth herein, the Bye-laws shall not be amended, modified or otherwise altered.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7339

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH MONROE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District

Judge. (3:94-cr-00041-nkm-4)

Submitted: August 19, 2008 Decided: September 8, 2008

Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Vacated and remanded with instructions by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Joseph Monroe, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United

States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia; Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*Monroe may file in the district court a motion to reduce his

sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008).

2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Monroe appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to reconsider the 360-month sentence imposed after a

jury convicted him in 1995 of drug-related offenses. Because the

motion to reconsider attacked the validity of his sentence rather

than any alleged defect in the collateral review process, the

motion amounted to a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000), that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider.*

See United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 207 (4th Cir. 2003);

see also Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524, 530-32 (2005)

(explaining differentiation between true motion filed pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and unauthorized successive habeas corpus

petition). Accordingly, we vacate the court’s order and remand

with instructions to dismiss Monroe’s motion to reconsider for lack

of jurisdiction. See Winestock, 340 F.3d at 208-09.

We deny Monroe’s motion to appoint counsel and motion to

remand for resentencing. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 183 (Thursday, September 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18888]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 of the Small Business 
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Harbert Mezzanine Partners SBIC II, 
L.P. (``Applicant''), One Riverchase Parkway South, Birmingham, AL 
35244, an SBIC Applicant under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended (``the Act''), in connection with the financing of a 
small concern, has sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and 
section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest, of 
the Small Business Administration (``SBA'') rules and regulations (13 
CFR 107.730 (2004)). Harbert Mezzanine Partners SBIC II, L.P. proposes 
to provide financing in the form of subordinated debt and Series B 
convertible preferred stock to Optical Experts Manufacturing, Inc. 
(``OEM''), 8500 Tyron Street, Charlotte, NC 28273. The proceeds will be 
used to finance the recapitalization of OEM.
    This investment requires an exemption from the prohibitions in 13 
CFR 107.730, Conflicts of Interest, because OEM is an Associate of the 
Applicant by virtue of the greater than 10 percent ownership interest 
held by Harbinger Mezzanine Partners, L.P. (``Harbinger'').
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

Jaime Guzman-Fournier,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 05-18888 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Taras Chebountchak, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of FC Financial Services Inc.. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2006, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

|By:    | /s/
      Taras Chebountchak
|------ | ----------------------------
|Name:  | TARAS CHEBOUNTCHAK          
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer and 
|       | Chief Financial Officer     
|Date:  | October 23, 2006            

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7284

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

WALTER LEWIS, JR., a/k/a Skeet, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:07-cr-00005-FPS-JES-1) 

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 20, 2008 

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Walter Lewis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Walter Lewis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lewis, 

No. 5:07-cr-00005-FPS-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. July 1, 2008). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
State of North Carolina v. Lawrence Henry Dawson

No. 313P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Dawson, Lawrence Henry.

David Boone, Assistant Attorney General, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of August 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
Order entered April 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01106
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 01107
- CR
DEWAYNE KEITH FINCHE R, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas Co unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F08
- 63186
- M , F10
- 51689
- M



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeals. On January 21, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s record had not been filed. We have not received the finding s, but on April 8, 2015, we received the reporter’s record. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeals, we VACATE the January 21, 2015 order requiring findings. Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.
/s/ LANA MYE RS JUSTICE
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER BITTOLA AND DANNA BITTOLA, INDIVIDUALLY 

### AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, ALEXANDER BITTOLA VERSUS NEKITA HARMON, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, GELCO CORPORATION AND 3M COMPANY NO. 

### 2021 CW 1231

JANUARY 21, 2022

In Re: Danna Bittola, 

## individuallyand on behalf of herminor child, Alexander Bittola, applying for 

### supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

### Tammany, No. 2018- 10797.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. 

### Plaintiff failed to meet her burden of proof on the motion in limine, as no evidence was 

## formally introduced at the 

## hearing. Evidence not 

### properly and 

### officially offered and 

### introduced cannot be considered, even if it is 

### physically placed in the record. Documents attached to memoranda do not 

### constitute evidence and cannot be considered as such on appeal. Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc., 

### 2007-2143 ( La. 

### 5/21/08), 

### 983 So.2d 84, 88. JEW

Theriot, J., 

## concurs andwoulddenythewrit. McClendon, J., concurs 

### in part and 

### dissents in part. An 

## expertwitness may not give expert testimonybeyond the scope of the 

### field of expertise in which 

### he is qualified. State v. Williams, 615 So.2d 1009, 

### 1022 ( La. 

### App. 1st Cir.), 

### writ denied, 619 

### So.2d 543 ( La. 1993). 

## Specifically, a 

### biomechanics expert cannot 

### testify as to whether the collision caused a plaintiff' s 

### injuries since 

### he is not a medical expert. See Collins v. Benton, 

### 18-7465, 2020 WL 3605942, at * 

### 8 ( E. D. La. 

### July 2, 

### 2020). However, 

### he can opine on the 

### force of impact experienced 

# byplaintiffsandhowahypothetical humanbodyusuallyresponds to such force, both of 

### which may assist the 

## jury in 

### evaluating whether the collision caused the purported 

### injuries and if so the extent of 

### damages. Id.; see also Jones v. Bravata, 2018- 0837 ( La. 

### App. 1st Cir. 5/ 9/ 19), 280 So.3d 

### 226, writ denied, 

### 2019-01850 ( La. 

### 2/26/20), 294 So. 3d 477. 

## Accordingly, I would reverse 

### in part the 

### district court' s June 1, 2021 

### judgment 

## denying the " Motion 

### in Limine 

### Regarding the 

### Testimony of Wilson C. Hayes, Ph.D." 

## filed by Plaintiff, Danna Bittola, 

## individually and on 

### behalf of her minor child, Alexander Bittola, and grant the motion to exclude Dr. Hayes' s opinion as to medical causation. I would 

## deny the writ application in all other respects. 

### OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# 9
1*

# 0

DEPUT

# 4LEK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I,  Cliff T. Davis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of  Nevsun Resources Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.

/@/ Cliff T. Davis

Signature

March 23, 2006

Date

Chief Financial Officer

Title
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Nevsun Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cliff T. Davis, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/@/ Cliff T. Davis



Cliff T. Davis

Chief Financial Officer



March 30, 2005
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF McLEODUSA INCORPORATED

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                             State of       
Name                                                       Incorporation
----                                                       -------------
<S>                                                        <C> 
McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc.                     Iowa

McLeodUSA Media Group, Inc.                                     Iowa

McLeodUSA Publishing Company                                    Iowa

McLeodUSA Diversified, Inc.                                     Iowa

McLeodUSA Network Services, Inc.                                Iowa

Consolidated Communication Inc.                                 Delaware

Consolidated Communications Directories Inc.                    Illinois

Consolidated Communications Telecom Services Inc.               Illinois

Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company                         Illinois

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 3, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135305 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

JULIE KENNEY,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 135305 

 COA: 278090 

WCAC: 04-000409 

ALTICOR, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted in light of Stokes v Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich 266 

(2008). 

CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal.

 WEAVER, J. (dissenting). 

I dissent from the order remanding this case to the Court of Appeals as on leave 

granted for reconsideration in light of Stokes v Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich 266 (2008). 

Because I dissented from the majority opinion in Stokes, I would grant leave to 

appeal in this case to consider whether the Stokes majority reached the correct decision in 

Stokes. 

KELLY, J., joins the statement of WEAVER, J. 

0930 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 3, 2008 

Clerk