alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 16 January 2008 – Scippacercola and Terezakis v Commission**

**(Case T-306/05)**

Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Allegation of excessive charges applied by the operator of Athens International Airport – Rejection of the complaint – No Community interest

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Decision closing a
proceeding on a complaint for infringement of the competition rules (Art. 230 EC; Council Regulations Nos 17, Art. 3(2)(b),
and 1/2003, Art. 7(2)) (see paras 66-70)*

2.                     *Competition – Administrative procedure – Examination of complaints – Determination of priorities by the Commission (Arts 81
EC, 82 EC, 85(1) EC and 253 EC; Council Regulations Nos 17, Art. 3(2), and 1/2003, Art. 7(2)) (see paras 91-97, 129-130, 149,
174, 180, 191-192)*

3.                     *Actions for annulment – Action against a decision to take no action on a complaint in competition matters – Plea based on
failure to take a position on one of the aspects of the complaint – Omission falling within the action for failure to act
– Action devoid of purpose in relation to that plea (Arts 230 EC and 232 EC) (see para. 160)*

4.                     *Competition – Administrative procedure – Examination of complaints – Taking into account the Community interest in investigating
a case – Criteria for assessment (Council Regulations Nos 17, Art. 3(2), and 1/2003, Art. 7(2)) (see paras 133-134, 148, 187,
189)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment in part of the Commission’s decision of 2 May 2005 pursuant to Article 7(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 EC and 82 EC (OJ 2004 L 123, p. 18), rejecting complaint No COMP/D3/38469 concerning the levy of certain charges by the operator of Athens International Airport at Spata and by Olympic Fuel Company. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Isabella Scippacercola and Ioannis Terezakis to pay the costs. |
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18535]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; Drug Risk 
Solutions, LLC

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to Drug Risk Solutions, LLC, a revocable, nonassignable, 
exclusive license to practice in the field of laboratory and ``on 
site'' analysis of human hair, other keratinized structures, blood, 
urine and saliva for drugs of abuse in the United States and certain 
foreign countries, the Government-owned inventions described in U.S. 
Patent No. 5,183,740: Flow Immunosensor Method and Apparatus, Navy Case 
No. 71,694.//U.S. Patent No. 5,354,654: Lyophilized Ligand-Receptor 
Complexes for Assays and Sensors, Navy Case No. 75,239.//U.S. Patent 
No. 6,020,209: Microcapillary-Based Flow-Through Immunosensor and 
Displacement Immunoassay Using the Same, Navy Case No. 78,211.//U.S. 
Patent No. 6,245,296: Flow Immunosensor Apparatus, Navy Case No. 
74,399.//U.S. Patent No. 6,323,042: Microcapillary-Based Flow-Through 
Immunosensor and Displacement Immunoassay Using the Same, Navy Case No. 
80,164.//U.S. Patent No. 6,750,031: Displacement Assay on a Porous 
Membrane, Navy Case No. 77,298.//U.S. Patent No. 6,808,937: 
Displacement Assay on a Porous Membrane, Navy Case No. 83,243 and any 
continuations, divisionals or re-issues thereof.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than October 4, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Research 
Laboratory, Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-
5320.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jane Kuhl, Head, Technology 
Transfer Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, 
DC 20375-5320, tel 202-767-3083. Due to U.S. Postal delays, please fax 
202-404-7920, E-Mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#177c627f7b57626378677e763979657b397976616e397a7e7b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8de6f8e5e1cdf8f9e2fde4eca3e3ffe1a3e3ecfbf4a3e0e4e1">[email protected]</span></a> or use courier delivery 
to expedite response.

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.)

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
I. C. Le Moyne Jr.,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18535 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lisa A. Corbitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/   LISA A. CORBITT
 Lisa A. Corbitt
 Chief Financial Officer
 April 14, 2011
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,   acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the  Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing  certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K  solely pursuant  to  section  906 of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)  and is not being  filed  as part of the  Form  10-K  or as a  separate disclosure document.
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
INN OF THE MOUNTAIN GODS RESORT AND CASINO
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Lance KintzBy:
    
    Lance KintzTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3855 

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 

the annual budget submissions of the Presidents include the total dollar 

amount requested for intelligence or intelligence related activities of each 

element of the Government engaged in such activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2014 

Mrs. LUMMIS (for herself, Mr. WELCH, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. PRICE of 

North Carolina, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, and Mr. JORDAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, 

to require that the annual budget submissions of the 

Presidents include the total dollar amount requested for 

intelligence or intelligence related activities of each element of the Government engaged in such activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Intelligence Budget 

5 Transparency Act of 2014’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3855 IH

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF EACH 

2 ELEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT. 

3 Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended by redesignating the second paragraph (37) as 

5 paragraph (39) and by adding at the end the following 

6 new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(40)(A) the total dollar amount proposed in 

8 the budget for intelligence or intelligence related ac9 tivities of each element of the Government engaged 

10 in such activities in the fiscal year for which the 

11 budget is submitted and the estimated appropriation 

12 required for each of the ensuing four fiscal years; 

13 and 

14 ‘‘(B) as used in subparagraph (A), the term 

15 ‘element of the Government’ refers to each element 

16 of the intelligence community as defined in section 

17 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 

18 U.S.C. 3003(4)).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 3.1



| |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                   
| |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | State of Delaware Secretary of State Division of Corporations Delivered 01:59 PM 07/02/2009 FILED 01:59 PM 07/02/2009 SRV 090670773  2285904 FILE

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION





Sensus Metering Systems Inc. (the Corporation), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware. DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:

1. That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, desiring to amend the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation, has adopted the following resolution by unanimous written consent in accordance with the provisions of Section 141(f) and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware:

RESOLVED, that Article FIRST of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be amended to change the name of the corporation, and as so
amended, shall read in its entirety as follows:

FIRST: The name of the corporation (the Corporation) is Sensus USA
Inc.

2. The resolution amending the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was duly adopted by written consent of the sole
stockholder of the Corporation in accordance with the applicable provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, and written notice of the adoption of such resolution has been given as provided by
Section 222 of the General Corporation Law to every stockholder entitled to such notice.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has
caused this Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by Peter Mainz, its President and CEO this 2nd day of July, 2009.



By:

LOGOPeter Mainz, Its President and
CEO
# C_2009044EN.01004701.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/47

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 December 2008 — RSA Security Ireland v Commission

(Case T-210/07) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Common Customs Tariff - Issue of binding tariff information - Power of the national customs authorities - Non-actionable measure - Inadmissibility)

(2009/C 44/82)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: RSA Security Ireland (Shannon, Ireland) (represented by: B. Conway, Barrister, and S. Daly, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Schønberg and D. Lawunmi, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for the annulment of a decision allegedly taken by the Commission and communicated to the applicant by email of the Irish Revenue Commissioners of 30 March 2007 concerning the classification of goods under a certain heading of the Combined Nomenclature.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | RSA Security Ireland Ltd shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

RSA Security Ireland Ltd shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 4.8.2007.

1

---
In the Matter of the Foreclosure of Deed of Trust executed by Daryl O. SUTTON and Shonda J. Sutton in the original amount of $136,000.00 dated April 14, 2005, recorded in Book 6297, Page 1933, Guilford County Registry, Substitute Trustee Services, Inc., Substitute Trustee.

No. 213P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Charles K. Blackmon, Greensboro, for Sutton, Daryl O., et al.

Brandy L. Mills, Greensboro, for Sutton, Daryl O., et al.

D. Kyle Deak, Raleigh, for Substitute Trustee Services, Inc. (Substitute Trustee).

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of June 2015 by Respondents in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> *67"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51246

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EVA CERVANTES-QUINTERO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-653-ALL

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eva Cervantes-Quintero appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty

plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. She argues that her guidelines sentence was unreasonable because it

was greater than necessary to meet the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

and that her guidelines sentence is not entitled to a presumption of

reasonableness.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 29, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51246

2

The abuse-of-discretion standard of review applies to appellate review of

sentencing decisions. Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 594 (2007). A

discretionary sentence imposed within a properly calculated guidelines range is

presumptively reasonable. United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th

Cir.2006); see also Gall, 128 S. Ct. at 594.

Cervantes-Quintero argues that her guidelines sentence is not entitled to

a presumption of reasonableness because U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is not “empirically

supported.” As she did not raise this argument in the district court, it is

reviewed for plain error. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 272

(5th Cir. 2005). Cervantes-Quintero has failed to show plain error. See United

States v. Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 338-39 (5th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, Cervantes-Quintero’s within guidelines sentence is presumed

reasonable, and she has failed to overcome that presumption. See Alonzo, 435

F.3d at 554. To the extent Cervantes-Quintero argues that her sentence is

unreasonable based upon the factors she presented to the district court, we

discern no reason to disturb the district court’s exercise of its discretion. See

Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d at 339.

In light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), CervantesQuintero challenges the sentence imposed for her conviction by questioning the

constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated

felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that

must be found by a jury. As Cervantes-Quintero concedes, this argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998).

United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied,

128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

AFFIRMED.
State of North Carolina v. Meredith Anthony Mitchell, Defendant.

No. COA16-448

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

NO ERROR.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2010 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law.

Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a), or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sensus (Bermuda
2) Ltd. and Sensus USA Inc.



|                |  |                                             |  |          |  |                                            
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | -------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|/s/ PETER MAINZ |  | /s/ JEFFREY J. KYLE                        
|Name:           |  | Peter Mainz                                 |  | Name:    |  | Jeffrey J. Kyle                            
|Title:          |  | Chief Executive Officer & President         |  | Title:   |  | Chief Financial Officer                    
|Company:        |  | Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus
USA Inc. |  | Company: |  | Sensus (Bermuda 2) Ltd. and Sensus USA Inc.
|Date:           |  | August 2, 2010                              |  | Date:    |  | August 2, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 7 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk September 7 , 2017

155245 (7 5 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 155245

v COA: 326311

Wayne CC: 14

- 009512

- FC

ELISAH KYLE THOMAS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the time

for filing its supplemental brief is GRANTED

. The supplemental brief sub mitted on

September 1, 2017, is accepted for fil ing

.
State of North Carolina v. Anthony Jasper Tolliver

No. COA16-500

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

NO ERROR.
1645.

#### Lowry *et al. v.*The State.

Accusation of misdemeanor, from city court of Cartersville— Judge Eoute. December 18, 1908.

Argued February 9,

Decided February 20, 1909.

*James B. Congers,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Watt H. Milner, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

This case is controlled by the decision in *Hopkins*v. *State,*No. 1643, ante. *Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit 23


                        Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors Horizon Financial Services, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 of Horizon Financial Services, Inc. of our report dated July 26, 2002,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Horizon Financial Services, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June
30, 2002, which report appears in the June 30, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K
of Horizon Financial Services, Inc.

                                                          /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                          ------------
                                                          KPMG LLP

     Des Moines, Iowa
     September 25, 2002
Turnip Investments, LLC, Plaintiff v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Subsidiary of Deutsche Trust Corporation, f/k/a Bankers Trust Company, individually and as trustee for RAMP 2004-SL4; GMAC Mortgage, LLC; Grady I. Ingle, Substitute Trustee; and Elizabeth B. Ells, Substitute Trustee, Defendants

No. COA16-246

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of McLeodUSA Incorporated (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G. Kenneth Burckhardt, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|/s/G. KENNETH BURCKHARDTName: G. Kenneth Burckhardt
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 25, 2005 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
JARRETT v. JARRETT

354P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 28, 2016

G. Russell Kornegay, III, Attorney at Law, Preston O. Odom, III, Attorney at Law, John Paul Tsahakis, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Jarrett, William Andrew.

Catrina Jarrett, Celia Pistolis, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, TeAndra Miller, Attorney at Law, Cary, Amy Vukovich, Attorney at Law, Emma Smiley, Attorney at Law, for Jarrett, Catrina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of September 2016 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of October 2016."