alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4076 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4076

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To address shortages and interruptions in the availability of propane 
   and other home heating fuels in the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Home Heating Emergency Assistance 
Through Transportation Act of 2014'' or the ``HHEATT Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. PROPANE AND HOME HEATING FUEL EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a 
covered emergency exemption issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Administration shall remain in effect until May 31, 2014, unless the 
Secretary of Transportation, after consultation with the Governors of 
affected States, determines that the emergency for which the exemption 
was provided ends before that date.
    (b) Covered Emergency Exemption Defined.--In this section, the term 
``covered emergency exemption'' means an exemption issued under section 
390.23 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, or extended under 
section 390.25 of such title that--
            (1) was issued or extended during the period beginning on 
        February 5, 2014, and ending on the date of enactment of this 
        Act; and
            (2) provided regulatory relief for commercial motor vehicle 
        operations providing direct assistance supporting the delivery 
        of propane and home heating fuels.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in subsection (a) may be 
construed to prohibit the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 
from issuing or extending a covered emergency exemption beyond May 31, 
2014, under other Federal law.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 4, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4076

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To address shortages and interruptions in the availability of propane 
   and other home heating fuels in the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
# C_2008223EN.01004302.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/43

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 June 2008 — Denka International v Commission

(Case T-30/07) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Directive 2006/92/EC - Maximal levels for dichlorvos residues - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissible)

(2008/C 223/74)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Denka International (Barneveld, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission (represented by: L. Parpala and B. Doherty, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Directive 2006/92/EC of 9 November 2006 amending annexes to Council Directives 76/895/EEC, 86/362/EEC and 90/642/EEC as regards maximum levels for captan, dichlorvos, ethion and folpet (OJ 2006 L 311, p. 31).

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible.

| 2. | Orders Denka International BV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Denka International BV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 14.4.2007.

1

---
Exhibit
4.1




	
  

  	
  FULLY PAID AND
  NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF
  transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized
  attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This
  Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
  registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation
  and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: CHIEF
  FINANCIAL OFFICER PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER This Certifies that
  is the owner of FCL T2 Biosystems, Inc. T2 Biosystems, Inc. INCORPORATED
  UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
  AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC. (Brooklyn, NY) Transfer
  Agent and Registrar By Authorized Officer SHARES CUSIP 35952H 10 6 SEE
  REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS COMMON STOCK DELAWARE SEAL 2006 CORPORATE T2
  Biosystems 

  






 















	
  

  	
  The following
  abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
  shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
  applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN as tenants in common
  as tenants by the entireties as joint tenants with right of survivorship and
  not as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT– Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under
  Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used
  though not in the above list. – – – of the common stock represented by the
  within Certificate, and do(es) hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint to
  transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with
  full power of substitution in the premises. For value received, hereby sell,
  assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING
  NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE Shares PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS,
  INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE Dated THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH
  WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS, THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS,
  PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF
  EACH CLASS OF STOCK OF THE CORPORATION AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR
  RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. Attorney Signature(s)
  Guaranteed: THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
  INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT
  UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM),
  PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
  MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE
  IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
  X X
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136567 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136567 

 COA: 283719 

Wayne CC: 06-011379

THOMAS HAROLD ZAKER,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 14, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1008 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 15, 2008 

 Clerk
Revised 6/30/05

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On [DATE] and [DATE], we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:

DELIVERED:

	COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.

	APPELLANT

	V.

	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE COURT OF  COUNTYNO. 2-08-3851-   -        -CV

HuUbBeErRtT JoOnNeEsS, III	APPELLANT	

	V.

DoOnN D. OtTiIsS	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 THE        DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON            COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On ssEPTEMBERSeptember 3, 2008, sEPTEMBERSeptember 15, 2008,   ___________ and September 26, 2008, __________, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 75[or $175 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $1275 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court'’s order of Auaugusgust 28, 2007July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)43.4..

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DELIVERED:  October 7916, 2008
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 11, 2021

No. 04-21-00003-CR

David LUNA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-1176-CR-B

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant 

to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel asserts there are no meritorious issues to 

raise on appeal. Counsel has informed appellant of his right to file his own brief and provided 

appellant with a form motion for requesting the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 

313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, 

no pet.). 

If appellant desires to request the appellate record, he must file the motion requesting the 

record within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. If appellant desires to file a pro se 

brief, he must do so within forty-five (45) days from the date of this order. See Bruns, 924 

S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later 

than thirty (30) days after the date appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. 

It is ORDERED that counsel’s motion to withdraw is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending 

further order of the court.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 10, 2009



|                                      |  |                                                                 
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dennis M. Oates                   |  | /s/ Richard M. Ubinger                                          
|Dennis M. Oates                       |  | Richard M. Ubinger                                              
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|(Principal Executive Officer)         |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3957 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3957

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 218-10 Merrick Boulevard in Springfield Gardens, New York, as the 
               ``Cynthia Jenkins Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2014

Mr. Meeks (for himself, Mr. Bishop of New York, Ms. Clarke of New York, 
Mr. Collins of New York, Mr. Crowley, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Israel, 
 Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Ms. Meng, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Jeffries, Mr. 
Nadler, Mr. Grimm, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
 Serrano, Mr. Engel, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, 
Mr. Gibson, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Owens, Mr. Hanna, Mr. Reed, Mr. Maffei, Ms. 
 Slaughter, and Mr. Higgins) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 218-10 Merrick Boulevard in Springfield Gardens, New York, as the 
               ``Cynthia Jenkins Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYNTHIA JENKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 218-10 Merrick Boulevard in Springfield Gardens, New York, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Cynthia Jenkins Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cynthia 
Jenkins Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
State of North Carolina v. Torrey Arleace Mays, Defendant.

No. COA16-315

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

NO ERROR.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55413-55414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV-058-04-1610-DR-241E]


Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision and Resource 
Management Plan for the Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) and 
Resource Management Plan (RMP).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act 
(NEPA), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), the Bureau 
of Land Management (BLM) management policies, and the Red Rock Canyon 
National Conservation Area Establishment Act, the BLM announces the 
availability of the ROD/RMP for Red Rock Canyon National Conservation 
Area (RRCNCA). The Nevada State Director will sign the ROD/RMP, which 
becomes effective immediately.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD/RMP are available upon request from the 
Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area Manager, Timothy P. O'Brien, 
Las Vegas Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, 4701 N. Torrey Pines 
Ave, Las Vegas, NV 89130 or via the Internet at: http://www.nv.blm.gov/vegas. Copies can also be requested by calling (702) 515-5000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy P. O'Brien, Red Rock Canyon 
National Conservation Area Manager, 4701 N. Torrey Pines, Las Vegas, NV 
89130, or by telephone at (702) 515-5058, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#76221f1b19021e0f29395134041f131836141a1b58111900">Timothy_O'<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e5c6c777b705e7c727330797168">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The RMP describes the actions to conserve, 
protect, and enhance the endangered species, wilderness 
characteristics, unique geological, archeological, ecological, 
cultural, and recreation resources that are encompassed within the 
RRCNCA for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. 
The RRCNCA ROD/RMP

[[Page 55414]]

provides management decisions for 197,000 acres.

Juan Palma,
Field Manager, Las Vegas.
[FR Doc. 05-18973 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 17, 2009




/s/ Grant KingGrant KingChief Executive Officer
# CE2004088EN.01005101.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/51

---

(2004/C 88 E/0054)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1928/03

by Maria Carrilho (PSE) to the Commission

(13 June 2003)

Subject:   Aid to uprooted people in Asia and Latin America: revision of Regulation (EC) No 2130/2001 of 29 October 2001

Subject:

Given the need to avoid any interruption in the aid to uprooted people in Asia and Latin America and the fact that in 2001, prior to the September terrorist attacks, when all donors had reduced their contributions, the Commission, to its credit, sent out a positive signal concerning its strategy by increasing the amounts earmarked for this specific aid, would the Commission answer the following questions:

As the current Regulation (EC) No 2130/2001 (1) of 29 October 2001 is due to expire on 31 December 2004, does the Commission intend to submit a proposal to extend the regulation? If so, when?

1

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(4 July 2003)

(4 July 2003)

In July 2002, the Commission adopted a proposal for a ‘Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community co-operation with Asian and Latin American countries’ (2). This proposal has been submitted to the Parliament and the Council and is currently under discussion.

2

With a view to reducing the number of legal bases, the proposed Regulation also covers Community assistance to uprooted people and will, when adopted, repeal Regulation (EC) No 2130/2001 of the Parliament and of the Council of 29 October 2001 on operations to aid uprooted people in Asian and Latin American developing countries.

Should the adoption of the ‘Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning Community co-operation with Asian and Latin American countries’ be delayed, there would be a risk that the new Regulation would not enter into force before 31 December 2004. In that event the Commission would submit a proposal to extend the period of application of Regulation (EC) No 2130/2001. This proposal for extending the current Regulation would be introduced sufficiently early so as to ensure continuity of assistance to uprooted people.

---

(1)  OJ L 287, 31.10.2001, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ C 331 E, 31.12.2002.

2

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4044 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the child tax 

credit for 2 years. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2014 

Mr. BRALEY of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the child tax credit for 2 years. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Tax Credit Res5 toration Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF CHILD TAX CREDIT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24 of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following new subsection: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4044 IH

1 ‘‘(g) SPECIAL RULES FOR 2014 AND 2015.—In the 

2 case of any taxable year beginning in 2014 or 2015— 

3 ‘‘(1) INCREASED CREDIT PER CHILD.—Sub4 section (a) shall be applied by substituting ‘$2,000’ 

5 for ‘$1,000’. 

6 ‘‘(2) INCREASED REFUNDABILITY.—Subsection 

7 (d)(1)(B)(i) shall be applied by substituting ‘30 per8 cent’ for ‘15 percent’.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

 The HONORABLE ALFRED T. GOODWIN, United

States Senior Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit,

sitting by designation.

-1-

 

No. 95-2637

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, *

 *

 Appellee, *

 *

 v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the 

 * Western District of Missouri

TIMOTHY ANDRE CARTER, * 

 *

 Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

 

 Submitted: December 12, 1995

 Filed: January 9, 1996

 

Before MAGILL, GOODWIN1, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

Timothy H. Carter was convicted by a jury of violating 21

U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(a). He appeals, contending that the

trial court erred in allowing the jury to hear evidence, pursuant

to Fed. R. Evid. 404 (b), of other drug transactions between Carter

and the government witness. We have carefully examined the trial
 2

 Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge

for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

record and are satisfied that the district court2 committed no

error in ruling upon the admissibility of the challenged evidence.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See Eighth Circuit Rule

47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.