alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,239,061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  658,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,520
<INVENTORY>                                  2,879,340
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,934,075
<PP&E>                                       1,637,489
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,005,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,586,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          648,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,100
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,774,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,586,849
<SALES>                                      2,846,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,846,709
<CGS>                                        1,705,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,776,274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               244,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,866,278)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,866,278)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,866,278)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.60)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1








The
      following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer of Saxon Capital, Inc. on the basis of each such
      officer’s knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002:





**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Saxon Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on July 14, 2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned, as
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their
      knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








July
                14, 2006
            /s/
                Michael L. SawyerMichael
                L. SawyerChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Robert B. EastepRobert
                B. EastepChief
                Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification accompanies the Report
      and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of the
      Report.
State v. David Michael Reed

365A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 6, 2017

Paul E. Smith, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Reed, David Michael.

E. Burke Haywood, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 3rd of January 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of January 2017."

*804Defendant shall have up to and including the 16th day of February 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-96024) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Formula
Stock Option Plan, and the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Video Update, Inc. of our
report dated August 13, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Video Update, Inc. appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended April 30, 1999.

                                        /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 12, 1999
# C_2010234EN.01005302.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/53

---

Order of the General Court of 30 June 2010 — Torres v OHIM — Torres de Anguix (A TORRES de ANGUIX)

(Case T-286/07) (1)

1

()

2010/C 234/94

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23.1










Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement Nos. 333-134360, 333-64612, 333-64614, 333-20687, 333-105045, and 333-121409 on Form S-8 of Unity Bancorp, Inc., of our report dated March 17, 2011, relating to the audit of the 2010 consolidated financial statements of Unity Bancorp, Inc., which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which report is incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Unity Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.








/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP





Blue Bell, Pennsylvania


March 17, 2011


78
<PAGE>   1
                                                           EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

FORE Systems, Inc. owns, either directly or indirectly, through another
wholly-owned subsidiary, all of the outstanding equity interests in each of the
following companies which do business under their respective corporate names:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                     JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----------                                     -----------------------------
<S>                                            <C>
FORE SYSTEMS Holding Corporation               Delaware
FORE Systems Federal, Inc.                     Delaware
FORE Systems Worldwide, Inc.                   Delaware
ALANTEC Corporation                            Delaware
CellAccess Technology, Inc.                    California
Scalable Networks, Inc.                        Delaware
Cadia Networks, Inc.                           Delaware
Nemesys Holding Company                        Delaware
ALANTEC International, Inc.                    California
FORE Systems Japan, Inc.                       Japan
FORE Systems Limited                           United Kingdom
FORE Systems International Inc.                Barbados
FORE Systems GmbH                              Federal Republic of Germany
Nemesys Research                               United Kingdom
FORE Systems S.A.R.L.                          France
FORE Systems AG                                Switzerland
FORE Systems B.V.                              Netherlands
FORE Systems Limited                           Hong Kong
FORE Systems Limited                           Ireland
FORE Systems Limited                           Bermuda
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.15**

**CONSENT OF DANIEL J. (DAN) REDMOND, P.GEO.**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibits thereto, ofGoldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the “Annual Report”), I, Daniel J. (Dan) Redmond, P.Geo., consent to (i) the use of and reference to the technical report dated 31 December, 2015,entitled “Peñasquito Polymetallic Operation, Zacatecas State, Mexico, NI 43-101 Technical Report” (the “Technical Report”), or portions thereof, that was prepared by me, that Isupervised the preparation of and/or was reviewed and approved by me, (ii) the use of and references to my name, including as an expert or “qualified person”, in connection with the Annual Report and the Technical Report, and (iii) theinformation derived or summarized from the Technical Report that is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto. 

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibits thereto intoRegistration Statement Nos. 333-126039,333-126040,333-151243,333-151251,333-174376,333-181116,333-188805,333-195816 and333-213153 on Form S-8,No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company. 

Date: March16, 2017
State of North Carolina v. Royal Spencer Robinson

No. COA16-567

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

NO ERROR.
# C_2008092EN.01002701.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/27

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 March 2008 — Combescot v Commisssion

(Case T-414/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Inadmissibility of the action before the Civil Service Tribunal - Time-limit for bringing an action)

(2008/C 92/54)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Philippe Combescot (Popayán, Colombia) (represented by: A. Maritati and V. Messa, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commisssion of the European Communities (represented by: V. Joris and M. Velardo, Agents, assisted by S. Corongiu, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 October 2006 in Case F-114/05 Combescot v Commisssion, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the setting aside of that judgment.

Combescot

Commisssion

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Philippe Combescot to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Philippe Combescot to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.

1

---
On petition for review filed March 17,1997,

petition for review allowed; decision of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to Court of Appeals with instructions January 27, 2000

#### STEVEN RAY WAGY, *Petitioner on Review, v.*BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, *Respondent on Review.*

(CA A90587 (Control), A94238; SC S44077)

(Cases Consolidated)

995 P2d 1158

Andy Simrin, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

No appearance *contra.*

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, and Leeson, Justices.**

**

 Fadeley, J., retired January 31,1998, and did not participate in this decision; Graber, J., resigned March 3Í, 1998, and did not participate in this decision; Kulongoski and Riggs, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to dismiss the petition for judicial review. *See Quintero v. Board of Parole,*329 Or 319, 986 P2d 575(1999).
STATE of North Carolina v. Roby Gean DAVIS

No. COA 16-288

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 21, 2017

NO ERROR.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 26, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136451 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

VILLAGE OF NORTHPORT,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136451 

 COA: 282474 

Leelanau CC: 07-007609-CC 

PATRICIA J. SCOTT and NANCY KALCHIK, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. 

0923 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 26, 2008 

Clerk
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-08-00304-CV

IN RE TREND GATHERING AND TREATING, L.P.

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a motion to withdraw its petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dismiss this proceeding without prejudice.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance and

Justice Reyna

Petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 17, 2008

[OT06]
# C_2011311EN.01003303.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — France v Commission

(Case T-257/07) (1)

1

(Animal health - Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 - Protection against transmissible spongiform encephalopathies - Sheep and goats - Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 - Adoption of less restrictive eradication measures than those earlier prescribed - Precautionary principle)

2011/C 311/58

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented initially by E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, R. Loosli-Surrans and A.-L. During, then by E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, R. Loosli Surrans and B. Cabouat, agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Nolin, agent)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by I. Rao and C. Gibbs, then by I. Rao and L. Seeboruth, and then by L. Seeboruth and F. Penlington, agents, and T. Ward, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 of 17 June 2008 amending Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (OJ 2008 L 202, p. 11), in that it authorises less restrictive measures of surveillance and eradication than those earlier prescribed for sheep and goat herds.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission in respect of the main proceedings and the proceedings for interim measures; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission in respect of the main proceedings and the proceedings for interim measures;

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---
August 14, 1962

Major GeneralThomas S. Bishop Adjutant General of Texas Austin, Texas

Dear GeneralBishop: Opinion No. ~~-1416 Re: Does an appropriation exist out of which an injuredNational Guardsman, entitled by Article 5945(a), Vernon's Civil Statutes,may receive pay and allowances during his period of dlsability. Itwas held in a prior opinion of this office (WW-1390) that Major Billie G. Hollowell,Texas Air National Guard,was entitled to receive pay and allowances during his period of dissuchperiod not to exceed six (6) months under the $%f",f&s of Article 5945(a),Vernon's Civil Staiutes. You now ask this office to determinewhether an appropriation exists out of which Major Hollowellmay receive the pay and allowances to which he Is entitled.

In the AppropriationAct of the 57th Legislature, under the heading ADJUTANT GENERAL'SDEPARTMENT,we find the following: (1

. . . “6. For medical and hospital service fees and wages;" We are not concernedhere with medical and hospital service fees, inasmuch as the Federal government is furnishing those to Major Hollowell. However, from the linking of the fees and wages in line item 6, one can only conclude that the Legislature intended this particular appropriation to cover any expenditures that may become necessaryunder Article 5945(a). Further, in Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., the word "wages" is defined in part as follows: II Every form of remunerationpayable

for a given'periodto an individual for personal services, including salaries, commissions,vaca-Major GeneralThomas S. Bishop,page 2. (w-1416)

tion pay, dismissalwages, bonuses and reasonable value of board, rent, housing, lodging, payments in kind, tips, and any other similar advantage received from the individual'semployer or directlywith respect to work for him." We hold that the word "wages,"as used in the line item appropriation above quoted includes the pay and allowances to which Major Hollowell is entitled.

SUMMARY The appropriationmade in item 6, ADJUTANT GENERAL'SDEPARTMENT, of the Appropriation Act of the 57th Legislatureprovides the fund out of which pay and allowancesmay be paid to a National Guardsmanduring a period of disability,within the meaning of Article 5945(a),Vernon's Civil Statutes. Very truly yours, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas

MLQ:mkh:zt

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Bob Shannon J. C. Davis J. Arthur Sandlin REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Leonard Passmore
Shreve v. N.C. Dept. of Justice, et al.

151P14-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Ms. Kimberly Shreve, Pro Se.

*514Mr. Christopher McLennan, Assistant Attorney General, For N.C. Department of Justice, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of October 2016 by Plaintiff Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63**

**of Title18 of the United States Code**

 

I, Christa C.Leonard, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of Westaff, Inc.(the “Company”), that, to the best of my knowledge;

 

(1)           TheQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 24,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:                    March 16,2009

 
| /s/ Christa C. Leonard                            |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christa C. Leonard                                |   |
| Westaff, Inc.                                |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                     |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has beenprovided to Westaff, Inc. and will be retained by Westaff, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
March 30, 2007
    
    /s/ Andrew F. PuzderAndrew F. PuzderChief Executive Officer
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

SCHEDULE OF AGREEMENTS 

SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL IN ALL MATERIAL RESPECTS TO THE 

AGREEMENT FILED AS EXHIBIT 10.1 TO THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM 

F-3, PURSUANT TO INSTRUCTION 2 TO ITEM 601 OF REGULATION S-K 

The subsidiaries of Teekay LNG Operating LLC listed in the table below have entered into Shipbuilding Contracts, each dated July [•],
2014, with Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. and DY Tankers Limited. These agreements are substantially identical in all material respects to the agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Registration Statement on Form F-3,
except for differences relating to the identity of the buyer, the hull number of the vessel that is the subject of each such contract and various dates for performance under each agreement. 

 

															
	 Buyer
	  	 Hull No.
	  	Second
Instalment
Date	  	Third
Instalment
Date	  	Fourth
Instalment
Date	  	Target
Milestone
Dates	  	Initial
Acceptance
Date	  	Final
Delivery Date
	DSME Hull No. 2431 L.L.C.	  	2431	  	31 October 2017	  	30 April 2018	  	31 August 2018	  	Steel-cutting:12
December
2017	  	31 August 2019	  	29 November 2019
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Keel
laying:11
June 2018	  		  	
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Launching:
22
September
2018	  		  	
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Cargo
containment
system
installation:
15 June
2019	  		  	
								
	DSME Hull No. 2430 L.L.C.	  	2430	  	30 September 2017	  	31 March 2018	  	28 July 2018	  	Steel-
cutting: 03
November
2017	  	31 July 2019	  	29 October 2019
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Keel
laying: 30
April 2018	  		  	
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Launching:
28 July
2018	  		  	
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Cargo
containment
system
installation:
15 May
2019	  		  	
								
	DSME Hull No. 2425 L.L.C.	  	2425	  	31 October
2016	  	30 April 2017	  	31 August 2017	  	Steel-
cutting:
28 December
2016	  	31 August
2018	  	29 November
2018









															
		  		  		  		  		  	Keel laying:
26 June
2017	  		  	
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Launching:
23
September
2017	  		  	
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Cargo
containment
system
installation:
15 June
2018	  		  	
								
	DSME Hull No. 2433 L.L.C.	  	2433	  	31 December 2017	  	30 June
2018	  	31 October
2018	  	Steel-
cutting: 23
March
2018	  	31 October
2019	  	29 January
2020
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Keel
laying: 24
September
2018	  		  	
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Launching:
22
December
2018	  		  	
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Cargo
containment
system
installation:
16 August
2019	  		  	
								
	DSME Hull No. 2434 L.L.C.	  	2434	  	31 January 2018	  	30 July 2018	  	30 November
2018	  	Steel-
cutting:09
May 2018	  	30 November
2019	  	28 February
2020
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Keel
laying:12
November
2018	  		  	
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Launching:
09
February
2019	  		  	
								
		  		  		  		  		  	Cargo
containment
system
installation:
16
September
2019	  		  	


  
 - 2 -