alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14 Certification**I, Frank P. Vaughan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Cronos Group (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 16, 2007/s/ FRANK P. VAUGHAN
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-08-00111-CV

JERRY AUTRY, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON

BEHALF OF AUTRY-KENNEDY ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SHAWN KENNEDY AND OHM AUTOMATION, INC.,

Appellees

From the 413th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. C200500520

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jerry Autry, individually and on behalf of the company he partially owned, 

Autry-Kennedy Enterprises, Inc., sued Shawn Kennedy and OHM Automation, Inc. 

Kennedy and OHM filed a motion for summary judgment and two supplemental 

motions for summary judgment alleging various grounds for summary judgment. The 

trial court granted all the motions without specifying upon which ground it was 

relying. Because at least one ground on which summary judgment was sought was not 

challenged on appeal, we affirm.
Autry v. Kennedy Page 2

To obtain a reversal when the trial court does not specify the basis for its 

summary judgment, the appealing party must show it is error for the judgment to be 

based on any ground asserted in the motion. Star-Telegram, Inc. v. Doe, 915 S.W.2d 471, 

473 (Tex. 1995). One ground asserted in Kennedy and OHM’s first motion was the 

defense of the statute of limitations. Autry did not respond to that ground at the trial 

court and has not challenged that ground in his appeal. Having no complaint from 

Autry regarding the trial court’s decision to grant the motion for summary judgment 

based on the limitations ground, we must affirm the summary judgment in favor of 

Kennedy and OHM. See Shanklin v. Grimes, No. 10-01-00023-CV, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 

5332 (Tex. App.—Waco June 25, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.); Heister v. W. Shamrock, No. 

10-01-00366-CV, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 5160 (Tex. App.—Waco June 18, 2003, no pet.) 

(mem. op.).

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyna

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed September 24, 2008

[CV06]
**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**DIRECTOR      **

**AND      **

**PRESIDENT      **

**PURSUANT      TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (i)                      | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Corporation for the nine months                ended September 30, 2005 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   | (ii)                     | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Corporation.                                                                                              |

|   | By:     | */s/                Ivan Bebek*  |
|--------|--------------|---------------------------------------|
|   |         |                                  |
|   | Name:   | Ivan                Bebek        |
|   |         |                                  |
|   | Title:  | President,                Director    |
|   |         |                                  |
|   |         |                                  |
|   | Date:   | November                9, 2005  |

*This      written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      as an exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB. A signed      original of this statement has been provided to the Corporation and will be      retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange      Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This      certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the      extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Corporation for purposes      of      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange      Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference      into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange      Act, except to the extent that the Corporation specifically incorporates it      by      reference. *
# C_2009267EN.01006402.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/64

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 4 September 2009 — Pioneer Hi-Bred International v Commission

(Case T-139/07) (1)

1

(Approximation of laws - Deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms - Authorisation procedure for placing on the market - Failure by the Commission to submit draft measures to the regulatory committee - Action for failure to act - Action which becomes devoid of purpose in the course of proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2009/C 267/115

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. (Iowa, United States) (represented by: J. Temple Lang, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by: D. Lawunmi and C. Zadra, and subsequently by P. Oliver and C. Zadra, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for a declaration under Article 232 EC that, by failing to submit to the regulatory committee, in accordance with Article 5(2) of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (OJ 1999 L 184, p. 23), a draft of the measures to be taken with regard to the notification by the applicant relating to the placing on the market of genetically modified maize 1507, the Commission has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 18(1) of Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC (OJ 2001 L 106, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate in the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate in the present action.

| 2. | The Commission of the European Communities shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission of the European Communities shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 7.7.2007.

1

---
**Exhibit 99.10****CONSENT OF S. PRICE**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following document, which isbeing filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission: 1. The annual information form of the Company dated March 25, 2008, whichincludes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the PorcupineMine, and the properties described therein.Date: March 28, 2008         /s/ Stephen Price   Name:  Stephen Price, P. Geo.   Title:  Chief Geologist, Porcupine Mine
State v. John Frede Sabbaghrabaiotti

291P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 10, 2016

Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, for Sabbaghrabaiotti, John Frede.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of August 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of August 2016."
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of UAP Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the Thirty-Nine week period ended November 26, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, L. Kenneth Cordell, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 4, 2007



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ L. Kenneth Cordell               
|    |  | L. Kenneth Cordell                   
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | Principal Executive Officer
# C_2008022EN.01003901.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/39

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-20/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 22/69)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.

1

---
In the Matter of: A.S.

No. COA16-472

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

October 10, 2008

Mr. Michael Phillips

Phillips & Akers, P.C.

3200 Southwest Freeway, Suite 3200

Houston, TX 77027-7523

Honorable Gloria A. Saldana

224th District Court Judge, Bexar County

100 Dolorosa St., Ste. 400

San Antonio, TX 78205-3028

Mr. W. Burl Brock

Brock & Brock, P.C.

803 E. Mistletoe

San Antonio, TX 78212

RE:Case Number:  08-0584

Court of Appeals Number:  04-08-00469-CV

Trial Court Number:  2007-C118427

Style:IN RE  MACY'S TEXAS, INC.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted the motion for temporary relief and issued the enclosed stay order in the above-referenced case.  The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court. 

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

**Case No. 08-0584Page 1**
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, DonnaLehmann, as Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of BH/RE,L.L.C. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(A)  the accompanying Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(B)  the information in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated: November 14, 2007

 
|   | /S/ Donna  Lehmann                                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Donna  Lehmann                                           |
|   | Treasurer  (Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer) |

 

----
# C_2012025EN.01004602.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2011 — Deutsche Post v Commission

(Case T-421/07) (1)

(State aid - Measures taken by the German authorities in favour of Deutsche Post AG - Decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) EC - No prior definitive decision - Inadmissibility)

(2012/C 25/87)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: J. Sedemund and T. Lübbig, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by N. Khan and B. Martenczuk, and subsequently by Martenczuk and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: UPS Europe NV/SA (Brussels, Belgium); and UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG (Neuss, Germany) (represented by: T. Ottervanger and E. Henny, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission decision of 12 September 2007 to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88 (2) [EC] in respect of State aid granted by the Federal Republic of Germany to Deutsche Post AG (C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07))

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders Deutsche Post AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deutsche Post AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders UPS Europe NV/SA and UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders UPS Europe NV/SA and UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 26.1.2008.

---
HALL v. MAURICIO.

No. COA07-656.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Johnston (05CVS3418).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Louis L. Knickerbocker and William C. Hitchcock, certify that:



1.

We have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of R.G. Global Lifestyles, Inc.



2.

Based upon our knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3.

Based on our knowledge, the financial statements, consolidated financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and we are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including any subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)

presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and we have disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data, and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers and we have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated:  February
14, 2005





/s/ Louis L. Knickerbocker

Louis L. Knickerbocker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ William C. Hitchcock

William C. Hitchcock, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of PureDepth,
      Inc.
      do hereby certify that:




(a)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of PureDepth, Inc. for the quarter ended July
      31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of PureDepth,
      Inc.






Dated:
      September 14, 2006





/s/
      Fred
      Angelopoulos





Fred
      Angelopoulos


President
      and Chief Executive Officer






/s/
      Robert O’Callahan





Robert
      O’Callahan, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32:








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Huaren Organic Products on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jinzhong Fang, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.













May
      19, 2008
            /s/
      Jinzhong
    Fang


Jinzhong
Fang, Chief Executive Officer


and
Chief Financial Officer
Mike Campbell, Rhonda Campbell, Gail Campbell, John Fox, Jr., Sylvia Fox, Alan Harpe, Robin Harpe, Bill Sherrill, Norma Jean Sherrill, Richard Gordon, Susanne Gordan, Joe Brown, Patty Hewitt, Larry Marlin, First Rx Pharmacy, Beth Bush, Charles McNiel, Carol McNiel, Nga Amador, Jack Moore, Maria Moore, Jody Parlier, Cathy Parlier, David Lynch, Judith Lynch, Victor McIntyre, Louise McIntyre, Brian Fox, Carrie Norman, Charles Johnson, Mary Johnson, Landrea Rhyne, Tom Brandon, Sara Brandon, Michael Kepley, Sandy Kepley, Vince Cherry, James Foxworthy, Sheila Foxworthy, Chuck Dockery, Kim Dockery, Bill Murdock, Jeannie Murdock, Shirley Silva, Brent Warren, Michelle Warren, Jim Howard, Janet Howard, HCRI North Carolina Properties III, LP DBA Brookdale Senior Living Center, Louis Gordon, Travis Blackwelder, Statesville Bovine and Equine Center, Jared Reimann, Aimee Reimann, Lee Shepard, Cecil Davis, Imogene Davis, John Strikeleather III, Judy Voelske, Voelske Automotive, Cooney Properties, LLC, and Dr. Chip Cooney, Petitioners v. The City of Statesville, North Carolina, Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc., and Roserock Holdings, LLC, Respondents

No. COA16-101

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

AFFIRMED.