alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered January 12, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01607-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

AMY LYONS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA13-34796

ORDER

Appellee in the above case was charged with DWI and filed a pre-trial motion to 

suppress. On July 31, 2014, we issued an unpublished opinion reversing the trial court’s

order granting the motion to suppress. Petition for discretionary review was refused by 

the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on September 24, 2014, and our mandate issued on 

October 13, 2014. See State v. Lyons, No. 05–13–01607–CR, 2014 WL 3778913 (Tex. 

App.––Dallas July 31, 2014, pet ref’d). 

The Court has before it the State’s motion seeking return of State’s Exhibit no. 1, 

the dashboard-camera video, so that it will be available for the trial of the case. We 

GRANT the motion to the extent that we ORDER Pamela Sweeney, official court 
reporter of the County Criminal Court No. 3, to retrieve State’s Exhibit no. 1 from the 

Clerk of this Court within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
(Forms S-8) pertaining to Jayhawk Acceptance Corporation's Amended and Restated 
1994 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, Jayhawk Acceptance Corporation's 
Amended and Restated Non-Employee Stock Option Plan and Jayhawk Acceptance 
Corporation's Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated March 6, 1998, 
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Jayhawk Acceptance 
Corporation as of and for the two years in the period ended December 31, 1997 
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 14, 1999
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Markus Hollingsworth, :

Petitioner :

: No. 2024 C.D. 2016

v. :

: Unemployment Compensation :

Board of Review, :

Respondent :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10 th day o f August

, 201 8 , it is ORDERED that the

above

- captioned opinion filed May 17 , 201 8 , shall be designated OPINION rather

than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

________________________________ PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-31036

WEYERHAEUSER CO

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PETRO-HUNT LLC

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:04-CV-2177

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The order appealed from being a case-management order, rather than an

injunction, jurisdiction for this appeal is lacking. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1).

DISMISSED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 26, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4087 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4087

  To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to provide grants to 
            States for summer employment programs for youth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2014

  Mr. Kildee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to provide grants to 
            States for summer employment programs for youth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Empowering Youth Through Summer 
Employment Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS TO STATES FOR SUMMER EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH.

    Section 129 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 
2854) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Grants to States for Summer Employment Programs for Youth.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this Act, from the amount appropriated under paragraph (2), the 
        Secretary shall award grants to States to provide assistance to 
        local areas that have high concentrations of eligible youth to 
        enable such local areas to carry out programs described in 
        subsection (c)(1) that provide summer employment opportunities 
        for eligible youth, which are directly linked to academic and 
        occupational learning, as described in subsection (c)(2)(C), 
        except that the only measure of performance used to assess such 
        programs shall be the work readiness performance indicator 
        described in section 136(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).
            ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There are 
        authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000 to carry out this 
        subsection for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2019.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009006EN.01004503.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/45

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 4 November 2008 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-87/07) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Action for damages - Allegedly unlawful conduct on the part of the Commission's Medical Service - Inadmissibility - Failure to comply with a reasonable period for lodging a claim for compensation)

(2009/C 6/92)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of the Commission's decision not to grant the applicant's claim for compensation in respect of damage allegedly suffered by reason of the unlawful conduct of the Commission's Medical Service in dealing with three medical certificates produced by the applicant in the summer of 2001

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 20.10.2007, p. 45.

1

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KAISER PARTNER TRUST SERVICE ANSTALT,

Appellant,

v.

ABAY SARSEKEYEV and GREER BAY, LLC

Appellees.

No. 2D23-978

November 17, 2023

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Charles P. Sniffen, Judge.

Darol H.M. Carr of Farr, Farr, Emerich, Hackett, Carr and Holmes, P.A., 

Punta Gorda, for Appellant.

John A. Anthony and Nicholas Lafalce of Anthony & Partners, LLC, 

Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3926 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3926

 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to discharge student loans 
  for borrowers who are determined by the Commissioner of the Social 
Security Administration to be under a disability without expectation of 
                   medical or functional improvement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to discharge student loans 
  for borrowers who are determined by the Commissioner of the Social 
Security Administration to be under a disability without expectation of 
                   medical or functional improvement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISCHARGE OF STUDENTS LOANS FOR BORROWERS WHO ARE DISABLED 
              WITHOUT EXPECTATION OF MEDICAL IMPROVEMENT.

    Section 437(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087(a)) is amended--
            (1) in the paragraph heading for paragraph (2), by 
        inserting ``by the secretary of veterans affairs'' after 
        ``determinations''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Disability determinations by the commissioner of the 
        social security administration.--A borrower who has been 
        determined by the Commissioner of Social Security to be under a 
        disability (within the meaning of section 223(d) of the Social 
        Security Act) without expectation of medical or functional 
        improvement and who provides documentation of such 
        determination to the Secretary of Education, shall be 
        considered permanently and totally disabled for the purpose of 
        discharging such borrower's loans under this subsection, and 
        such borrower shall not be required to present additional 
        documentation for purposes of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008022EN.01005601.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/56

---

Action brought on 15 October 2007 — Bart Nijs v European Court of Auditors

(Case F-108/07)

(2008/C 22/108)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant(s): Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: European Court of Auditors

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the European Court of Auditors to renew the mandate of the Secretary General of the Court of Auditors for a further period of six years from 1 July 2007 |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Court of Auditors to renew the mandate of the Secretary General of the Court of Auditors for a further period of six years from 1 July 2007

| — | in the alternative, annul the two measures allegedly constituting ‘decisions of the appointing authority’ of 8 December 2006 implementing the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 October 2006 in Case T-171/05, and of 12 July 2007, rejecting the applicant's complaint of 12 March 2007 |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the two measures allegedly constituting ‘decisions of the appointing authority’ of 8 December 2006 implementing the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 October 2006 in Case T-171/05, and of 12 July 2007, rejecting the applicant's complaint of 12 March 2007

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant relies in particular on the following facts: (i) the Secretary General of the Court of Auditors acted unlawfully; rather than referring the matter to the Anti-Fraud Office, he expressly refused to take measures or to examine the question when he had been informed, with documentary evidence, of the existence of a fraud to the detriment of the invalidity pensions system; (ii) an official exercised his powers in an unlawful manner; (iii) promotion decisions and their dates were repeatedly not published; (iv) the staff committee elections of 2004 and 2006 were unlawful for a number of reasons; (v) there were many instances of misuse of the promotion procedure, of usurpation of the power to appoint allowed to a head of unit, and of personal interests likely to compromise the independence of the appointing authority in nearly all its decisions; (vi) the ‘decisions of the appointing authority’ emanated from the personal interests of all the applicant's hierarchical superiors, from the concealment of the call to a colleague to exercise superior functions on an interim basis, and from failure to refer the matter to the Anti-Fraud Office; (vii) the appointing authority based the contested decisions on the same series of manifest errors as the intial decisions, which they confirm, relying on a judgment that does not have the force of res judicata and without refuting any of the applicant's arguments; (viii) the committees also involved in the assessment and promotion procedure were not informed of the compromised independence of the applicant's hierarchical superiors.

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-81796, 33-99350, 333-01728, 333-04052, 333-17017
and 333-47483) the Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-00468) of FORE Systems, Inc., of our report dated
April 22, 1998, appearing on page 24 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

Price Waterhouse LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 29, 1998
# C_2009297EN.01002001.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/20

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 28 October 2009 — Juwel Aquarium v OHIM — Potschak (Panorama)

(Case T-339/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark Panorama - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2009/C 297/27

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Juwel Aquarium GmbH & Co. KG (Rotenburg, Germany) (represented by: P. Mes, C. Graf von der Groeben, G. Rother, J. Bühling, A. Verhauwen, J. Künzel, D. Jestaedt and M. Bergermann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance: Christian Potschak (Bobingen, Germany) (represented by: D. Donath, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 June 2007 (Case R 214/2006-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Christian Potschak and Juwel Aquarium GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Juwel Aquarium GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Juwel Aquarium GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.

1

---
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

September 12, 2008

Mr. Richard Kevin Spencer

Spencer & Waterbury

2501 Oak Lawn Ave., Ste. 295-LB 50

Dallas, TX 75219

Ms. Virginia Nelson Hammerle

The Hammerle Law Firm

2220 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 200

Denton, Tx 76205-7540

RE:Case Number:  08-0521

Court of Appeals Number:  02-05-00460-CV

Trial Court Number:  GA-2001-196

Style:IN RE  GUARDIANSHIP OF KATHRYN HOUSEWORTH GIBBS, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted Kenneth Vern Gibbs, et al.’s Motion to Abate and issued the enclosed abatement order in the above-referenced case.  The response to the petition for review is due no later than 5:00 p.m., October 15, 2008.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 08-0521Page 1**
STATE of North Carolina v. Donna Helms LEDBETTER

No. 402P15

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Meghan Adelle Jones, Attorney at Law, For Ledbetter, Donna Helms.

Ashleigh P. Dunston, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Defendant's petition for discretionary review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals to reconsider its holding in light of State v. Thomsen, --- N.C. ----. 789 S.E. 2d 639 (2016), and State v. Stubbs, 368 N.C. 40, 770 S.E. 2d 74 (2015). See Thomsen, --- N.C. at ----, 789 S.E. 2d at 642 (recognizing N.C.G. S. 7A-32(c)"creates a default rule that the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review a lower court judgment by writ of certiorari"); Stubbs, 368 N.C. at 44, 770 S.E. 2d at 76 (recognizing that Rule 21 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure cannot take away jurisdiction given to the Court of Appeals by N.C.G.S. 7A-32(c) ):

*217"Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th of December 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of August 2016 by Defendant to Lift the Abeyance of the Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**JAMES FRANKS,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**TREVOR WINGARD,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 65 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 21st day of June, 2016, the Application for Leav e to File Original** 

**Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is** DENIED

**.**
State v. William Edward Godwin, III

167PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 10, 2017

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Godwin, William Edward (III).

Teresa L. Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 10th of January 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of January 2017."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 18th day of January 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3948 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 

15-year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements, 

qualified restaurant buildings and improvements, and qualified retail 

improvements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2014 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for one year the 15-year straight-line cost recovery for 

qualified leasehold improvements, qualified restaurant 

buildings and improvements, and qualified retail improvements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3948 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF 15-YEAR STRAIGHT-LINE COST 

2 RECOVERY FOR QUALIFIED LEASEHOLD IM3 PROVEMENTS, QUALIFIED RESTAURANT 

4 BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS, AND 

5 QUALIFIED RETAIL IMPROVEMENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clauses (iv), (v), and (ix) of sec7 tion 168(e)(3)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

8 are each amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2014’’ and in9 serting ‘‘January 1, 2015’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

12 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ANNUAL SERVICER'S OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


                           WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.

            

         The undersigned, duly authorized representative of World Omni 
Financial Corp. ("WOFCO"), as Servicer, pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Second
Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 1994, as amended
by Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated
September 23, 1998 and as supplemented by the Supplement 1996-A to Servicing 
Agreement dated as of May 1, 1996, Supplement 1996-B to Servicing Agreement 
dated as of October 1, 1996, Supplement 1997-A to Servicing Agreement dated 
May 1, 1997, Supplement 1997-B to Servicing Agreement dated October 1, 1997, and
Supplement 1998-A to Servicing Agreement dated October 1, 1998, all between VT 
Inc., as Trustee of World Omni LT and WOFCO, (as amended and supplemented, the 
"Agreement"), does hereby certify that a review of the activities of the 
Servicer during the period from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998, has 
been made under my supervision with a view to determining whether during such 
period the Servicer has performed and observed all of its obligations under the
Agreement.  To the best of my knowledge, no default by the Servicer under the 
Agreement has occurred and is continuing.

         Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used as defined in 
the Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this 
Certificate this 31st day of March, 1999.


                                    By:________________________________
                                       Name:   Alan J. Browdy
                                       Title:  Vice President Accounting,
                                               Corporate Controller




                                     Page 1
TULLY v. CITY OF WILMINGTON

348A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 27, 2017

Katie Weaver Hartzog, Attorney at Law, Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, Attorney at Law, Dan Hartzog, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for City of Wilmington.

S. Luke Largess, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Cheyenne Chambers, Attorney at Law, for Tully, Kevin J.

J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, Megan Ashley Milliken, Attorney at Law, for Southern States Police Benevolent Association, et al.

M. Travis Payne, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Professional Fire Fighters and Paramedics of North Carolina.

Michael C. Byrne, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.

Robert M. Elliot, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Reynolds Michael Elliot, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Edmond W. Caldwell, Jr., Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Fred Baggett, Attorney at Law, Amy Y. Bason, General Counsel, Kimberly S. Hibbard, General Counsel, for N.C. Sheriffs' Association, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of February 2017 by Plaintiff to Strike Motion for Leave to Submit Amicus Brief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of February 2017."