alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark S. Hiltwein, the Chief Financial Officer of Cenveo, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2011 (the ‘‘Report’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 2, 2011                                                                                    /S/MARKS.HILTWEIN


Mark S. Hiltwein


Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Fang Jinzhong, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China Huaren Organic Products, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.   Date: November 19, 2007 /s/ Fang Jinzhong______________ Fang Jinzhong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
HOWELL v. N.C. WAYNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

326P15-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Burl Anderson Howell, For Howell, Burl Anderson.

Michael T. Wood, Special Deputy Attorney General, E.B. Borden Parker, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, For N.C. Wayne County Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of February 2017 by Petitioner to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
# CE2004070EN.01021601.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/216 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/216

---

(2004/C 70 E/232)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3095/03

by Koldo Gorostiaga Atxalandabaso (NI) to the Commission

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   Basque Country's recognition through repression

Subject:

In my written question E-0645/03 (1) dated 24 February 2003, I referred to the 634 politically motivated people who were arrested during 2002 in the Basque Country.

1

On 8 October, early in the morning, 34 people were arrested by the Spanish and French police on both sides of the border that divides our country and constitutes an internal iron curtain. Let me recall that Germany was able to commemorate last week the 13th anniversary of its reunification, while the Basque Country remains torn to pieces: It is not recognised at all in the Northern part, under French rule, and it is under two separate administrations as part of the Kingdom of Spain.

As those detainees all over the country indicate, can the Basque Country achieve recognition only through repression?

Could the Commission present a proposal for a Community action plan to guarantee the Basque people the right to exist?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(20 November 2003)

(20 November 2003)

The Commission takes the view that the facts to which the Honourable Member refers do not fall within the powers conferred on it by the European Union and Community Treaties.

---

(1)  OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 102.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (File Nos. 333-1350 and 333-4242) of Ottawa Financial Corporation on
Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement (File No.333-4950) of Ottawa
Financial Corporation on form S-3 of our report dated February 20, 1998, on the
financial statements of Ottawa Financial Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and
1996 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997,
which report is included in the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




                                               /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 27, 1998
State of North Carolina v. Rickey Harding Wagner, Jr.

No. 381P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Wagner, Rickey Harding (Jr.).

Staples Hughes, Durham.

Jennie Wilhelm Hauser, Special Deputy Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of October 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             305
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,901
<PP&E>                                         212,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,513
<BONDS>                                         45,731
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           158
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,176
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,178
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,936
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1755

LISA ANTOINE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
DELANC Y LLC, d/b/a Vital Medical Staffing , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv - 00523

- GCM )

Submitted : December 15, 2022 Decided: December 19, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge , and WILKINSON and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Lisa Antoine, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1755 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Lisa Antoine appeal s the district court’s orde r granting Defendant summary judgment and denying Antoine summary judgment on Antoine’s discrimination and
retaliation claim s, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 , and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621
to 634

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court ’s order

. Antoine v. Delancy LLC , No. 3:20

- cv - 00523

- GCM ( W.D.N.C. July 13 , 2022). We dispe nse with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1755 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT      32.**
**2**

| i.                                                   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| ii.                         | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| Dated:                February 14, 2007 |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                    |
|                                    | /S/                HADDON B.                LIBBY                  |
|                                    | Name:                Haddon B. Libby                                                                                                                    |
|                                    | Title:                Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                           |
1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CI-12331, filed in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County,

Texas. 

iii i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00569-CV

In Re Juan Roberto RODRIGUEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 27, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On August 4, 2008, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this court to order

the Bexar County District Clerk to file his civil action, which he refers to in his mandamus petition

as “Plaintiff’s Notice to Sue for Breach of Contract and Breach of Duty.” This court does not have

jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless such writ is necessary to

enforce this court’s jurisdiction. In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio

1998, orig. proceeding); see TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon 2004). Relator has

not asserted that the writ he is requesting is necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction, nor has he

provided a record that would support such an argument. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837
04-08-00569-CV

-2-

(Tex. 1992) (holding relator has burden of providing a sufficient record to establish right to

mandamus relief). For these reasons, the petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 25, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00886

- CR

Jimmy TURNER

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6595B

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

Appellant ’ s brief is due July 23, 2014.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3926 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to discharge student loans 

for borrowers who are determined by the Commissioner of the Social 

Security Administration to be under a disability without expectation 

of medical or functional improvement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2014 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to discharge 

student loans for borrowers who are determined by the 

Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to 

be under a disability without expectation of medical or 

functional improvement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCHARGE OF STUDENTS LOANS FOR BOR4 ROWERS WHO ARE DISABLED WITHOUT EX5 PECTATION OF MEDICAL IMPROVEMENT. 

6 Section 437(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

7 (20 U.S.C. 1087(a)) is amended— 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3926 IH

1 (1) in the paragraph heading for paragraph (2), 

2 by inserting ‘‘BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AF3 FAIRS’’ after ‘‘DETERMINATIONS’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(3) DISABILITY DETERMINATIONS BY THE

6 COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINIS7 TRATION.—A borrower who has been determined by 

8 the Commissioner of Social Security to be under a 

9 disability (within the meaning of section 223(d) of 

10 the Social Security Act) without expectation of med11 ical or functional improvement and who provides 

12 documentation of such determination to the Sec13 retary of Education, shall be considered permanently 

14 and totally disabled for the purpose of discharging 

15 such borrower’s loans under this subsection, and 

16 such borrower shall not be required to present addi17 tional documentation for purposes of this sub18 section.’’. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of PureDepth,
      Inc.
      do hereby certify that:





(a)
      the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PureDepth, Inc. for the period ended
      July 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of PureDepth,
      Inc.











Dated:
      September 12, 2007








/s/
      Thomas L. Marcus





Thomas
      L.
      Marcus


Interim
      Chief Executive Officer











/s/
      Jonathan J. McCaman





Jonathan
      J. McCaman Chief
        Financial Officer and
 Chief
        Accounting Officer
**Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2009 – Commission v Poland**

**(Case C-475/07)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Electricity tax – Directive 2003/96/EC – First subparagraph of Article 21(5) – Time at which the tax becomes chargeable

1.                     *Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute
– Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Unambiguous wording of the form of order sought by
the applicant (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 38(1)(c)) (see paras 43-44)*

2.                     *Acts of the institutions – Directives – Implementation by Member States – Need for clear and precise transposition (Art. 249
EC) (see para. 49)*

3.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Proof of failure – Burden of proof on Commission – Insufficient or inadequate
transposition of a directive (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 54)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Article 21(5) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51) – Time at which the electricity tax becomes chargeable. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adapt, by 1 January 2006, its system of electricity tax, with regard to the time at which the electricity tax becomes chargeable, to the requirements of the first subparagraph of Article 21(5) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, as amended by Council Directive 2004/74/EC of 29 April 2004, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
State v. James Cummings

407P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Ms. Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. Maureen Krueger, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. James Cummings, Beaufort, Pro Per.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of November 2016 by Defendant for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."