alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1159

DIANA KAYIBANDA,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals.

Submitted: September 2, 2008 Decided: September 11, 2008

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter Nyoh, PETER NYOH AND ASSOCIATES, Silver Spring, Maryland, for

Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General,

Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Senior Litigation Counsel, Lauren E.

Fascett, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Diana Kayibanda, a native of Uganda and a citizen of

Rwanda, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of her

applications for relief from removal. 

Kayibanda first challenges the determination that she

failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of

a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show

that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable

factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.”

INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have

reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Kayibanda fails

to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed

to qualify for asylum, Kayibanda cannot meet the more stringent

standard for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198,

205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430

(1987). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Freddie Wayne HUFF, II v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

No. 119P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Randolph M. James, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Huff, Freddie Wayne (II).

Tammera S. Hill, Assistant Attorney General, for NC Department of Public Safety.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th of April 2016 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00224-CV

Jeffrey Lee Hoyle, Appellant

v.

Sheriff William Baird and Margarette Smith, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF RUNNELS COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 14,294, HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Jeffrey Hoyle appealed from a final orderthat was signed on April 3, 2008.

On August 19, 2008, this Court notified Hoyle that his brief was overdue and that his failure to file

a motion for extension of time by August 29, 2008, would result in the dismissal of his appeal for

want of prosecution. To date, Hoyle has not responded to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, we

dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: October 3, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
BEIJING MED-PHARM CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Beijing Med-Pharm Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ FRED M. POWELLFred M. PowellChief Financial Officer
 33
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Alternative Resources Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-85078, 333-12693, 333-84967 and 333-84969) on Form S-8 of Alternative
Resources Corporation of our report dated March 24, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Alternative Resources Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1999, which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1999 annual
report on Form 10-K of Alternative Resources Corporation.

We also consent to the use of our report on the related consolidated financial
statement schedule dated March 24, 2000 included herein.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 2000
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4050 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to provide for alternate means 

of proof of period of military service for purposes of the interest rate 

limitation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2014 

Mr. HECK of Washington (for himself and Mr. KILMER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to provide 

for alternate means of proof of period of military service 

for purposes of the interest rate limitation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servicemembers Op5 portunity Act’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4050 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROOF OF PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE FOR PUR2 POSES OF INTEREST RATE LIMITATION 

3 UNDER THE SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF 

4 ACT. 

5 Section 207(b)(1) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief 

6 Act (50 U.S.C. App. 527(b)(1)) is amended by inserting 

7 after ‘‘calling the servicemember to military service’’ the 

8 following: ‘‘, or other appropriate indicator of military 

9 service, including a certified letter from a commanding of10 ficer or information from the Defense Manpower Database 

11 Center,’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.15 


LOAN AGREEMENT


 


THIS LOAN AGREEMENT
("Agreement") is made May  29 , 2007, between the Borrower and Lender identified in the attached Authorization,
GP 277-203-6006 GA, issued by the U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") to Lender, dated April 26, 2007
("Authorization").


SBA has authorized
a guaranty of a loan from Lender to Borrower for the amount and under the terms stated in the attached Authorization (the "Loan").


In consideration
of the promises in this Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, Borrower and Lender agree as follows:


		1.	Subject to the terms and conditions of the Authorization and SBA's Participating Lender Rules as
defined in the Guarantee Agreement between Lender and SBA, Lender agrees to make the Loan if Borrower complies with the following
"Borrower Requirements."



Borrower must:


		a.	Provide Lender with all certifications, documents or other information Lender is required by the
Authorization to obtain from Borrower or any third party;



		b.	Execute a note and any other documents required by Lender; and



		c.	Do everything necessary for Lender to comply with the terms and conditions of the Authorization.



		2.	The terms and conditions of this Agreement:



		a.	Are binding on Borrower and Lender and their successors and assigns; and



		b.	Will remain in effect after the closing of the Loan.



		3.	Failure to abide by any of the Borrower Requirements will constitute an event of default under
the note and other loan documents.



 


Borrower:SAFETY QUICK LIGHT LLC


 


By: /s/ Rani R. Kohen


 


Title: Sole Member


 


 


 


Lender:SIGNATURE BANK OF GEORGIA


 


By: /s/ Brian Elrod


 


Title: SBA Team Leader


 


[BANK SEAL]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4119 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4119

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study of the West Hunter Street Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2014

 Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. 
   David Scott of Georgia, Mr. Barrow of Georgia, and Mr. Bishop of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study of the West Hunter Street Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``West Hunter Street Baptist Church 
Study Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special 
resource study of the historic West Hunter Street Baptist Church, 
located at 775 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, SW., Atlanta, Georgia.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) evaluate the national significance of the site;
            (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the area as a unit of the National Park System;
            (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 
        protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, State, 
        or local governmental entities, or private and nonprofit 
        organizations;
            (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or local 
        governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations or 
        any other interested individuals; and
            (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal acquisition, 
        development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance 
        associated with the alternatives.
    (c) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with section 8 of Public Law 91-383 (16 
U.S.C. 1a-5; commonly known as the ``National Park Service General 
Authorities Act'').
    (d) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are first made available for the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report containing the results of the study 
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 01-15-00233-CV

________________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT

HOUSTON, TEXAS

________________________________________

EL AHORRO PROPERTIES, LLC, ADVENTURE SUPERMARKETS, LLC 

and ROSARA INVESTMENTS, LLC

Appellants 

vs.

AYDA MARTINEZ

Appellee 

_________________________________________________________________

AMENDED JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

__________________________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1, Appellants and 

Appellee file this amended joint motion to dismiss the appeal and would 

respectfully show this Court as follows:

1. The parties have reached an agreement to abate the underlying lawsuit 

pending mediation and, if mediation is unsuccessful, arbitration. As a result, 

Appellants no longer wish to pursue this appeal.

2. In accordance with their agreement, the parties jointly request that the 

Court grant this motion and dismiss the appeal. 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00233-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

5/14/2015 9:40:26 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/14/2015 9:40:26 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

3. In further accordance with their agreement, all taxable Court costs 

shall be paid by the party who incurred same.

Respectfully submitted,

EGGLESTON & BRISCOE, LLP

4800 Three Allen Center

333 Clay Street

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 659-5100 – Telephone 

(713) 951-9920 – Facsimile

By: /s/ David W. Smith

David W. Smith 

State Bar No. 24027868

dws@egglestonbriscoe.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS

MOLINA LAW FIRM

11550 Fuqua, Suite 580

Houston, Texas 77034

(281) 922-4300 – Telephone 

(281) 922-4325 – Facsimile

By:

Rick Molina

 /s/ Rick Molina 

State Bar No. 00784621

rmolina@molinalawfirm.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that I have conferred with Rick Molina, counsel for Appellee, and 

Appellee does not oppose dismissal and has joined this motion.

__/s/ David W. Smith

David W. Smith

_______

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served on 

the following counsel of record via electronic notification and/or facsimile on this 

the 14th day of May 2015:

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Rick Molina

Molina Law Firm

11550 Fuqua, Suite 580

Houston, Texas 77034

__/s/ David W. Smith

David W. Smith

_______
State of North Carolina v. Thomas Derussell Knight

No. 97A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Mr. Craig M. Cooley, Attorney at Law, For Knight, Thomas Derussell

Mr. Robert C. Montgomery, Ms. Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, Ms. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by State of NC on the 24th of March 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of March 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15 (g)(2).
Sara PENNINGA, Plaintiff, v. Reuben TRAVIS, Defendant.

No. COA16-751

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 21, 2017

VACATED AND REMANDED.
[Cite as State v. Madaris, 123 Ohio St.3d 127, 2009-Ohio-4903.] 

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MADARIS, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as State v. Madaris, 123 Ohio St.3d 127, 2009-Ohio-4903.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Harris. 

(No. 2008-1052 — Submitted August 11, 2009 — Decided September 22, 2009.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-070287, 

2008-Ohio-2470. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority 

of State v. Harris, 122 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-3323, 911 N.E.2d 882.

 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. 

Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. 

Timothy Young, State Public Defender, and Sarah M. Schregardus, 

Assistant State Public Defender, for appellee. 

__________________
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The
Board of Directors
Alternative Resources Corporation:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-85078, 333-12693, 333-84967 and 333-84969) on
Form S-8 of Alternative Resources Corporation (the Company) of our reports dated March 30, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Alternative Resources
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash
flows, and the related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which reports appear in the December 31, 2003
annual report on Form 10-K of Alternative Resources Corporation. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, on January 1, 2002.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 30, 2004

---

QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of R.G. Global Lifestyles, Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Dated:  October 19, 2004





/s/ Louis L. Knickerbocker

Louis L. Knickerbocker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ William C. Hitchcock

William C. Hitchcock, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.8
 CONSENT OF D. CRICK
   1.
    
    The technical report dated November 17, 2006, entitled The Red Lake
Gold Mines Property, Red Lake Mining Division, Northern Ontario (the
Red Lake Report); and2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection
with information relating to the Red Lake Report and the Red Lake Gold
Mines, and the properties described therein.
  /s/ Dean CrickName:
    Dean Crick, M. Sc., P. Geo.
STATE of North Carolina v. Lawrence Donell FLOOD, Sr., Defendant.

No. COA16-252

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 15, 2016

NO PLAIN ERROR.
State of North Carolina v. Askia Nuriddin Shabazz

No. COA16-526

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
# C_2009113EN.01004402.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/44

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 March 2009 — FMC Chemical and Others v Commission

(Case T-349/07 and T-350/07) (1)

1

2009/C 113/89

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.

1

---
E. BROOKS WILKINS FAMILY MEDICINE, P.A. v. WAKEMED; WakeMed d/b/a Falls Pointe Medical Group ; Inam Rashid, MD ; Michele Casey, MD; Monica Oei, MD ; and Leslie Robinson, MD

No. 41P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

John M. Kirby, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for E. Brooks Wilkins Family Medicine, P.A.

William R. Forstner, Attorney at Law, Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for WakeMed, et al.

Julian H. Wright, Jr., Attorney at Law, Andrew A. Kasper, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Rashid, Inam (MD), et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of February 2016 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."