alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.23

                  AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment"), made as of
this 5th day of November, 2002, by and between Cronos Containers S.r.L., an
Italian corporation (the "Employer"), and Nico Sciacovelli (the "Employee"),

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

                  WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into a Memorandum
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1999, as amended on December 18,
2001 (hereinafter, the "Employment Agreement"); and

                  WHEREAS, pursuant to clauses 1.1 and 12.1 of the Employment
Agreement, Employer agreed to employ Employee, and Employee agreed to serve in
the employ of the Employer, on an exclusive and full-time basis, as the Vice
President of Europe of Employer, through November 30, 2003, subject to earlier
termination pursuant to the provisions of the Employment Agreement; and

                  WHEREAS, Employer and Employee desire to extend the term of
the Employment Agreement;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

                  6.       Extension of Term of Employment Agreement. Employer
agrees to employ the Employee, and the Employee agrees to serve in the employ of
the Employer, on an exclusive and full-time basis, in the position identified
for Employee in the Employment Agreement, subject to the supervision and
direction

                                                                         - E34 -

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.23

of that person or persons set forth in the Employment Agreement, through
November 30, 2004, unless such period is sooner terminated by either party
giving the other not less than three (3) months written notice and pursuant to
the provisions of the Employment Agreement.

                  7.       Continuance in Force of Employment Agreement. Other
than as specifically amended hereby, the terms and provisions of the Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer and the Employee have signed
this Amendment, effective as of the date and year first above written.

                                             "EMPLOYER"

                                             CRONOS CONTAINERS S.R.L.

                                             By /s/ PETER J. YOUNGER

                                                Peter J. Younger

                                             Its Director

                                             "EMPLOYEE"

                                                /s/ N. SCIACOVELLI

                                                N. Sciacovelli

                                                                         - E35 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEETS AND RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANICAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    13434
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      19967
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 34910
<PP&E>                                           19971
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   54828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            28507
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         10914
<OTHER-SE>                                       11219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     54828
<SALES>                                         147849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                147849
<CGS>                                           126823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   126823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7872
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4722
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4722
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
        

</TABLE>
State of North Carolina v. Silvestre Alvarado Chaves

No. 339P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Mr. Silvestre Alvarado Chaves, For Chaves, Silvestre Alvarado.

Mr. Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, For State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Ervin, J.

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th of September 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Unknown County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
##### 



EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(TEMPORARY)
 th
 WITNESSETH
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 ARTICLE 1: EMPLOYMENT AND DUTIES:
    - 1 -




---



##### 



ARTICLE 2: COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS:
    - 2 -




---



##### 



ARTICLE 3: TERMINATION PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OF TERM AND EFFECTS OF SUCH TERMINATION:
  ARTICLE 4: CONTINUATION OF EMPLOYMENT BEYOND TERM; TERMINATION AND EFFECTS OF TERMINATION:
  ARTICLE 5: MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE LAWS, MESCALERO APACHE TRIBAL GAMING COMMISSION REGULATIONS AND
UNITED STATES INDIAN GAMING REGULATORY ACT AND OTHER LAWS:
  - 3 -




---



##### 



ARTICLE 6: OWNERSHIP AND PROTECTION OF INFORMATION; COPYRIGHTS:
   - 4 -




---



##### 



ARTICLE 7: MISCELLANEOUS:
   - 5 -




---



##### 



If to Employer:Chief Operating Officer

Inn of the Mountain Gods Resort and Casino

287 Carrizo Canyon Road

Mescalero, New Mexico 88340
    
    and
    
    F. Randolph Burroughs, Esq.

Burroughs and Rhodes

906 Virginia Ave.

Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310
       - 6 -




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 INN OF THE MOUNTAIN GODS
RESORT AND CASINO
 By:
    
    /s/ Brian D. Parrish
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Melissa S. LintonBrian D. Parrish, Chief Operating Officer
    
    Melissa S. Linton, EmployeeThis 5th day of December, 2007.
 - 7 -




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A TO
 EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (TEMPORARY)
BETWEEN THE
INN OF THE MOUNTAIN GODS RESORT AND CASINO
AND
MELISSA S. LINTON
 Employee Name:
    
    Melissa S. LintonTerm:
    
    Effective the 5th day of December, 2007
thru 5th day of March, 2008Position:
    
    TreasurerLocation:
    
    Mescalero, New MexicoReporting Relationship:
    
    To Chief Operating Officer or any person so
designated by the Chief Operating Officer.Monthly Base Salary:
    
    $22,500.00 a month.Employee Benefits:
    
    This position is temporary. There are no employee
benefits available to Employee.Housing:
    
    Employee may reside in the building referred to as
the tower during her employment under this
agreement. All utilities will be furnished by
Employer.
 /s/
Brian D. Parrish
    
    
    
    /s/ Melissa S. LintonBrian D. Parrish, Chief Operating Officer
    
    Melissa S. Linton, EmployeeThis 5th day of December, 2007.
 - 1 -
State of North Carolina v. Antorio Maurice Smarr

No. 579P01-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Ms. Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Locke Bell, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

Mr. Antorio Rice Smarr, Pro Se.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th of October 2016 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Gaston County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Alphonson Damon Malone v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00054-CR

Trial court case number: 1899612

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 of Harris County

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 4, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P.

35.1. On February 26, 2014, this court granted Sondra Humphrey, the court reporter, an 

extension of time for filing the record to April 4, 2014, with no further extensions. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We ORDER Sondra Humphrey, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file 

the record in this appeal, if any, within 20 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 13, 2014
Exhibit 31.01



Certifications



I, J.A. Cardwell, Sr., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: March 29, 2005



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.              
|(J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6885

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RONALD STUART ROSE, a/k/a Rahking,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (3:03-cr-444)

Submitted: September 17, 2008 Decided: October 8, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Stuart Rose, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Stuart Rose appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000), and his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Rose, No. 3:03-cr-444 (E.D. Va. May 16 & 29, 2008). We

deny the motions for appointment of counsel and for a certificate

of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 26 June 2008 – SHS Polar Sistemas Informáticos v OHIM – Polaris
Software Lab (POLARIS)**

**(Case T-79/07)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community figurative mark POLARIS – Earlier Community word mark POLAR – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 48, 50-51)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 January 2007 (Case R 658/2006-2) relating to opposition proceedings between SHS Polar Sistemas Informáticos SL and Polaris Software Lab Ltd. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Polaris Software Lab Ltd |
| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark POLARIS for goods and services in Classes 9 and 42 – Application No 3267713 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | SHS Polar Sistemas Informáticos, SL |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Community word mark POLAR for goods and services in Classes 9, 38 and 42 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld in respect of all the goods at issue in Class 9 |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Decision of the Opposition Division annulled |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders SHS Polar Sistemas Informáticos, SL to pay the costs. |
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE COMPANY PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 CERTIFICATION
 Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Pehong Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of BroadVision, Inc. (the "Company"), and Shin-Yuan Tzou, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:
 
 1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 4thday of March, 2011.
 /s/  Pehong ChenPehong Chen

Chief Executive Officer
 
  /s/  Shin-Yuan TzouShin-Yuan Tzou

Chief Financial Officer
 This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of BroadVision, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer    I, B. Alva Schoomer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innocap, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date: September 27, 2007   /s/ B. Alva Schoomer B. Alva Schoomer Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 403 

To amend the percentage of funds appropriated under title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 required to be reserved 

for outlying areas and the Secretary of the Interior. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2013 

Mr. SABLAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the percentage of funds appropriated under title 

I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

1965 required to be reserved for outlying areas and 

the Secretary of the Interior. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRANTS FOR OUTLYING AREAS AND THE SEC4 RETARY OF THE INTERIOR. 

5 Section 1121(a) of the Elementary and Secondary 

6 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6331(a)) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 403 IH

1 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

2 striking ‘‘a total of 1 percent to provide assistance 

3 to’’; 

4 (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘.5 percent 

5 to provide assistance to’’ before ‘‘the outlying’’; and 

6 (3) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘.75 percent 

7 to provide assistance to’’ before ‘‘the Secretary’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40290

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MIGUEL ANGEL ARRIAGA-SALINAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-1715-ALL

--------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel

Angel Arriaga-Salinas (Arriaga) has filed a motion to withdraw

and brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744

(1967). Arriaga has not filed a response. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 1

- 0 0 2 5 8

- C R

Style: J eremy Thomas v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : March 5 , 201 5

Type of motion: State’s Third Motion for E xtension of T ime to F ile Appella te Brief

Party filing motion: Appellee

Document to be filed: Appellee’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 1 2 , 201 4

Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due date: March 4

, 201 5

Date Requested: March 31 , 201 5

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 No further extensions of time will be granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Give n the notice from the Clerk of Court on 2/5/15 granting appellee’s second motion

for an extension advis ed appellee that no further extensions would be granted, we

DENY appellee’s third motion for a 4

- week extension of time to file appellee’s

brief . If the appellee’s brief is not filed within 7 days from the date of this order, the

case may be considered on the appellant’s brief only. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.9(a).

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually

Date: March 19, 2015