alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                     2,465,563
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                625,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                (57,492)
<INVENTORY>                                9,914,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                     2,639,794
<DEPRECIATION>                             (650,214)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            16,962,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                   56,871,866
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   3,484,392
<OTHER-SE>                              (44,816,310)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              16,962,065
<SALES>                                    9,040,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           9,148,235
<CGS>                                      7,825,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              8,896,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              301,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                 120,594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 180,874
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN Television Corporation for thethree months ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Gary R. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and Vincent L. Sadusky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: November 9, 2005 By:  /s/ Gary R. Chapman    Gary R. Chapman    Chief Executive Officer                 Dated: November 9, 2005 By:  /s/ Vincent L. Sadusky    Vincent L. Sadusky    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
STATE of North Carolina v. Dana Alton LASSITER

No. COA15-1216

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: February 21, 2017

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 (the “Report”) of Hercules Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Scott Bluestein, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| Date: August 1, 2019 | By:    | /S/ SCOTT BLUESTEIN

                        |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Scott Bluestein                                   |
|                 |   | President, Chief Executive Officer, and |
|                 |   | Chief Investment Officer

         |
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EDWARD R. THOMAS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-553

[May 28, 2020]

Appeal of order denying 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the 

Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael C. Heisey, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 472014CF000744A.

Edward R. Thomas, Malone, pro se. 

No appearance required from appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

# ACTION:

Notice of an open meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. 

# TIME AND PLACE:

 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 at 10:30 a.m. The meeting will held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# OPEN AGENDA ITEM:

 PEFCO Secured Note Issues (Resolution).

# PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:

 The portion of the meeting, which relates to the above item, will be open to public participation. Attendees that are not employees of the Executive Branch will be required to sign in prior to the meeting.

# FURTHER INFORMATION:

 For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Telephone No. (202) 565-3957).

Howard A. Schweitzer,

General Counsel (Acting).

[FR Doc. 05-19076 Filed 9-20-05; 2:53 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136313 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136313 

 COA: 281965 

Oakland CC: 92-115146-FC 

TERRY D. ALTMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForms S-3 (No. 333-86457, 333-03986, 333-60651 and 333-109406) and Forms S-8 (No.333-19197, 333-60079 and 333-60619) of Winston Hotels, Inc. of our report dated March 14,2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41177

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAIME CASTRO-MORENO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-247-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

TheFederalPublic Defender appointed to represent Jaime Castro-Moreno

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castro-Moreno has responded by moving to

proceed pro se and to file a supplemental brief. Our independent review of the

record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-41177

2

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Castro-Moreno’s motions to proceed pro se and to file a

supplemental brief are DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901,

902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00289-CV

Ann Kitchen, Debra Danburg, Danny Duncan, Paul Clayton and Mike Head, Appellants

v.

Texas Association of Business d/b/a Texas Association of Business 

& Chambers of Commerce et al., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-02-004224, HONORABLE JOSEPH H. HART, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, explaining that they have, to

their satisfaction, settled their claims and no longer wish to pursue the appeal. We grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

___________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: September 19, 2008
Keaton v. ERMC III, et al.

262P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2016

M. Duane Jones, Attorney at Law, Joseph D. Delfino, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for ERMC III, et al.

Shannon Warf Wilson, Attorney at Law, for Keaton, Ronald G.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of July 2016 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<CIK>                    0000919957
<NAME>                   NTL (TRIANGLE) LLC
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
<CURRENCY>               U.K. POUNDS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.6158
<CASH>                                           27,895
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    19,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (9,452)
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 42,305
<PP&E>                                          479,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (97,920)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  901,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            51,772
<BONDS>                                         293,285
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              8
<OTHER-SE>                                      547,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    901,269
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                118,963
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   154,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               31,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 328,108
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             329,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    329,465
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0


</TABLE>
# C_2010288EN.01002901.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Commission v Alexiadou

(Case T-312/05) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Contract concerning a project for the development of a technology for the production of waterproof leathers - Failure to perform the contract - Reimbursement of sums advanced - Default interest - Referral back to the General Court after annulment - Default proceedings)

(2010/C 288/54)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agent)

Defendant: Efrosyni Alexiadou (Saloniki, Greece) (represented by: C. Matellas, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought by the Commission under Article 238 EC seeking an order for reimbursement of EUR 23 036,31 advanced by the Commission to the defendant under a contract concerning a project for developing a technology for the production of waterproof leathers (Contract G1ST-CT-2002-50227), together with default interest.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders Efrosyni Alexiadou to repay the sum of EUR 23 036,31 to the European Commission, together with default interest:






  — | at the rate of 5.25 % per annum from 1 March 2003 to 31 August 2005; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Orders Efrosyni Alexiadou to repay the sum of EUR 23 036,31 to the European Commission, together with default interest:

—

at the rate of 5.25 % per annum from 1 March 2003 to 31 August 2005;

| — | at the statutory annual rate applicable under Belgian law, with a ceiling of 5.25 % per annum, from 1 September 2005 to payment in full of the debt; |
| --- | --- |

—

at the statutory annual rate applicable under Belgian law, with a ceiling of 5.25 % per annum, from 1 September 2005 to payment in full of the debt;

| 2. | Orders Efrosyni Alexiadou to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Efrosyni Alexiadou to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 271, 29.10.2005.

---
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Ultradata Systems Incorporated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Ultradata Systems, Incorporated and will be retained by
Ultradata Systems, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

August 14, 2006                        /s/  Huakang Zhou
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Huakang Zhou
                                       (Chief executive officer and chief
                                        financial officer)
PITTSBORO MATTERS, INC., George A. Robertson, J. Turner Whitted, Christopher M. Watkins, Ducka Kelly and Greg Ogle, Plaintiff-Appellees, v. TOWN OF PITTSBORO, Defendant, v. Chatham Park Investors, LLC, Intervenor-Appellant.

No. COA16-28.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
INN OF THE MOUNTAIN GODS RESORT AND CASINO
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Douglas LentzBy:
    Douglas LentzTitle:
    Chief Operating Officer and Management
Board Member (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.27
  
 
      Very truly yours,
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION/s/ James R. BednarkJames R. BednarkSenior Vice President




---



##### 



CONSENT
   LACROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC.
    
    
    
    DANNER, INC./s/ Joseph P. Schneider
    
    
    
    /s/ Joseph P. SchneiderJoseph P. Schneider
    
    
    
    Joseph P. SchneiderPresident/Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    President/Chief Executive Officer/s/ David Carlson
    
    
    
    /s/ David CarlsonDavid Carlson
    
    
    
    David CarlsonExecutive Vice President, Chief
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Secretary
    
    
    
    Financial Officer and Secretary
1288.

#### Consignees' Favorite Box Company *v.*Meers.

Levy and claim, from city court of Dalton — Judge Longley, June 9, 1908.

Submitted October 29,

Decided November 10, 1908.

*M. C. Tarver, George G. Glenn,*for plaintiff in error.

*William E. Mann,*contra.

Powell, J.

It appearing that the claimant bought the property in dispute in settlement of a bona fide indebtedness from the defendant in attachment, and had taken possession of it prior to the issuance and levy of the attachment, and there being nothing in the record to impeach the good faith of the transaction, the verdict finding the property subject to attachment was contrary to law. See *Ga., Fla. & Ala. Ry. Co.*v. *Sizer,*4 *Ga. App.*126 (60 S. E. 1026). *Judgment reversed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from MovieFone
Inc.'s consolidated financial statements as of and for the twelve months ended
December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,482,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,586,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    370,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,819,540
<PP&E>                                       6,071,681
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,569,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,593,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,755,508
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,172
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,709,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,593,111
<SALES>                                        476,612
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,597,918
<CGS>                                          473,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,478,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,773,509)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,773,509)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,773,509)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
James E. PRICE v. Larry SMITH, Interim Chief of Police, Durham Police Department, and Michael D. Andrews, Sheriff of Durham County, North Carolina

No. 319P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 2016

James E. Price, for Price, James E.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 29th of August 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Durham County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of August 2016 by Petitioner to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of August 2016."