alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAIN v. COBBLESTONE HOA OF CLAYTON, INC.

377A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 13, 2016

J. Matthew Waters, Attorney at Law, Hope Derby Carmichael, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Cobblestone HOA of Clayton, Inc.

Robert Sain, Jennifer Sain, For Sain, Robert, et al.

Dennis Draughon.

Tatita Sanchez.

Robert A. Spence, Jr., Attorney at Law, Smithfield.

Vincent Franks, Jr.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of October 2016 by Defendant to Consolidate Appeals:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of October 2016."
EXHIBIT 32

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cameron International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
Samuels, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of August, 2005.

/s/ Stephen Samuels
------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Triangle Petroleum Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark G.
Gustafson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  
 Date:
      June 10, 2005
    By:*/s/ MARK G. GUSTAFSON*Mark
      G. GustafsonPresident,
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56690-56691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19368]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements

[[Page 56691]]

are available through the Commission's Office of Agreements (202-523-
5793 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e4a4c5f5a5b5f505f52474d574d7e58535d10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84f0f6e5e0e1e5eae5e8fdf7edf7c4e2e9e7aae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>).

    Agreement No.: 011346-014.
    Title: Israel Trade Conference Agreement.
    Parties: Farrell Lines, Inc.; P&O Nedlloyd Limited; and Zim 
Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell; 1850 M 
Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment limits the parties' authority to cargo 
moving for the account of specific governmental organizations as well 
as under existing agreement service contracts.

    Agreement No.: 011920.
    Title: CMA CGM/Maruba Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: CMA CGM, S.A. and Maruba S.A.
    Filing Party: Paul M. Keane, Esq.; Cichanowicz, Callan, Keane, 
Vengrow & Textor, LLP; 61 Broadway; Suite 3000; New York, NY 10006-
2802.
    Synopsis: The agreement establishes a space charter arrangement 
between the parties in the trade between U.S. East Coast ports and 
ports in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Venezuela, and Colombia.

    By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: September 23, 2005.

Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-19368 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
On petition for review filed May 30, 1997,

petition for review allowed; decision of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to Court of Appeals with instructions January 27, 2000

#### PETER JAY SOSTILLIO, *Petitioner on Review, v.*BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, *Respondent on Review.*

(CA A93374; SC S44268)

997 P2d 190

Daniel Q. O’Dell, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

No appearance *contra.*

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, and Leeson, Justices.**

**

 Fadeley, J., retired January 31, 1998, and *did not*participate in this decision; Graber, J., resigned March 3Í, 1998, and did not participate in this decision; Kulongoski, and Riggs, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to dismiss the petition for judicial review. *See Quintero v. Board of Parole,*329 Or 319, 986 P2d 575 (1999).
# C_2008064EN.01003701.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/37

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 January 2008 — Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares and Hardware v Council

(Case T-206/07) (1)

1

(Anti-dumping - Importation of ironing boards originating in the People's Republic of China and Ukraine - Undertaking with market economy status - Rights of the defence - Articles 2(7)(c) and 20(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96)

(2008/C 64/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co. Ltd (Foshan, China) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, avocat and G. Vallera, barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hixs, Agent assisted initially by B. O'Connor, solicitor and P. Vergano, avocat, and subsequently by B. O'Connor, solicitor, and E. McGovern, barrister)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. van Vliet and K. Talabér-Ricz, Agents); Vale Mill (Rochdale) Ltd (Rochdale, United Kingdom); Pirola SpA (Mapello, Italy); Colombo New Scal SpA (Rovagnate, Italy) (represented by: G. Berrisch and G. Wolf, avocats); and the Italian Republic (represented by: I. Braguglia, Agent assisted by W. Ferrante, avvocato dello Stato)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 452/2007 of 23 April 2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ironing boards originating in the People's Republic of China and Ukraine (OJ 2007 L 109, p. 12) inasmuch as it imposes an anti-dumping duty on imports of ironing boards produced by the applicant

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Council, Vale Mill (Rochdale) Ltd, Pirola SpA and Colmbo New Scal SpA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Council, Vale Mill (Rochdale) Ltd, Pirola SpA and Colmbo New Scal SpA;

| 3. | Orders the Commission and the Italian Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission and the Italian Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Victor Nnamdi INYAMA

NO. COA13-666

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 6, 2014

Affirmed.
STATE v. Glenwood Earl DOWNEY

85A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 7, 2017

Michele Goldman, Attorney at Law, for Downey, Glenwood Earl.

Richard E. Slipsky, Special Deputy Attorney General, Scott T. Stroud, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 5th of April 2017 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of April 2017."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 15th day of May 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# C_2009069EN.01001202.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/12

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 October 2008 — AGC Flat Glass Europe SA, formerly Glaverbel SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-513/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(3) - Figurative mark representing the texture of a glass surface - Refusal of registration - Evidence of distinctive character acquired through use - Target public and territory to be considered)

(2009/C 69/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: AGC Flat Glass Europe SA, formerly Glaverbel SA (represented by: T. Koerl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 12 September 2007 in Case T-141/06 Glaverbel v OHIM by which the Court dismissed an action seeking annulment of Decision R 986/2004-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 1 March 2006 dismissing the action brought against the examiner's decision refusing registration of a figurative mark representing the texture of a glass surface for certain goods in Classes 19 and 21.

Glaverbel

OHIM

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | AGC Flat Glass Europe SA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

AGC Flat Glass Europe SA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 23.2.2008.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant toSection 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I,Donna Lehmann, Chief Financial Officer of BH/RE, L.L.C., a Nevada limitedliability company, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BH/RE, L.L.C.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.             The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a)           all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: November 14, 2005
|   | /S/ Donna Lehmann       |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Donna Lehmann           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

----
State of North Carolina v. Arvin Roscoe Hayes

No. 287P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 31, 2016

James R. Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hayes, Arvin Roscoe.

Daniel Snipes Johnson, Special Deputy Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of August 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this August 31, 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th of August 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of August 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of August 2016 by State of NC in this *795matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of August 2016."
# C_2008142EN.01002103.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 March 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-44/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 142/36)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.

1

---
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2007 – Commission v Luxembourg**

**Case C‐244/07**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2004/50/EC – Interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system and of the trans-European conventional rail system – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 9)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Objective nature (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 10)*

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 96/48/EC on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system and Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system (OJ 2004 L 164, p. 114). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 96/48/EC on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system and Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to comply with its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Automotive Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Arvin Scott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert W. Zimmer, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Arvin Scott
---------------------------------------

Name:  Arvin Scott
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 23, 2004


/s/ Robert W. Zimmer
---------------------------------------

Name:  Robert W. Zimmer
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  August 23, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Town Sports International Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ending March 31, 2005 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Pyle, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Richard PyleTown Sports International Holdings, Inc.Chief Financial OfficerOffice of the PresidentMay 3, 2005
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00673-CR

Johnny Steven MONTANA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006CR1926

Honorable Mary Román, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 15, 2008

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that the case is a “plea-bargain case, and

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of

appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

Appellant’s counsel has filed written notice with this court that counsel has reviewed the

record and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indication that
04-08-00673-CR

-2-

appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification showing that he has the right of

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177

(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s

counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
# C_2008051EN.01004302.xml

| 23.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/43

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2007 — Beniamino Donnici v European Parliament

(Case T-215/07) (1)

1

(Disclaimer of jurisdiction)

(2008/C 51/80)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Beniamino Donnici (Castrolibero, Italy) (represented by: M. Sanino, G. M. Roberti, I. Perego and P. Salvatore, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: H. Krück, N. Lorenz and L. Vasaggio, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 24 May 2007 on the verification of Beniamino Donnici's credentials [2007/2121(REG)] declaring invalid his mandate as member of the European Parliament

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The Court of First Instance disclaims jurisdiction in Case T-215/07 in favour of the Court of Justice so that the latter may rule on the application for annulment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Court of First Instance disclaims jurisdiction in Case T-215/07 in favour of the Court of Justice so that the latter may rule on the application for annulment.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 183 of 4.8.2007.

1

---