alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BE REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,141
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  224,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,295)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,351
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,264
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,087
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,087
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18


</TABLE>
State v. Shameil Dontel Smith

269P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Shameil Dontel Smith, for Smith, Shameil Dontel.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of July 2016 by Defendant to Transport:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Winston Hotels, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 33-93516) and Form S-8 (File No.
333-19197) of our report dated January 10, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule of
Winston Hotels, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the period June 2, 1994 through December 31,
1994, and of our report dated March 5, 1997, on our audits of the financial
statements of Winston Hospitality, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the period June 2, 1994
through December 31, 1994, and of our report dated September 21, 1994 on our
audit of the combined financial statements of Initial Hotels for the five
months ended June 2, 1994, which reports are included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.



                                         /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Raleigh, North Carolina
March 20, 1997
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 NUMBER SHARES 
REV rEVO
Biologics, Inc. 
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
SEE
REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
CUSIP 76155H 10 5 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT

SPECIMEN 
IS THE OWNER OF 
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF 
rEVO
Biologics, Inc. 
transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This
Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 
Witness the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly
authorized officers. 
Dated: 
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,
SECRETARY AND TREASURER 
PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY,
LLC 
(Brooklyn, NY) 
Transfer Agent and Registrar 
By Authorized Officer 
AMERICAN BANK NOTE COMPANY 







 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Certificate, shall
be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

									
	TEN COM—as tenants in common	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —	 	  
	 	Custodian	 	  

	TEN ENT —as tenants by the entireties	 		 	(Cust)	 		 	(Minor)
	JT TEN     —as joint tenants with right of	 		 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors


									
	                      survivorship and not as tenants	 		 	Act	 	  
	 	
	                      in common	 		 		 	(State)	 	

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For value received,
                     hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto 
  

			
	
    PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER    

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	 	
	 	 	
	 	 	

  

	
	 

 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 

 

	
	 

  

	
	 

 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________  shares
represented by the within Certificate, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________, attorney to transfer the said shares on the books of
the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
  

			
	Dated	 	  


  

					
		 		 	  

	 NOTICE:
	 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

  

			
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:	 	
		
	  
	 	
	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C.
RULE 17Ad-15.
FRIDAY INVESTMENTS, LLC v. BALLY TOTAL FITNESS OF THE MID-ATLANTIC, INC. f/k/a Bally Total Fitness of the Southeast, Inc. f/k/a Holiday Health Clubs of the Southeast, Inc. as successor-in-interest to Bally Total Fitness Corporation; and Bally Total Fitness Holdings Corporation

No. 248PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Lisa G. Godfrey, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Peter R. Fenn, Attorney at Law, Ira H. Grolman, Attorney at Law, Stacy C. Cordes, Attorney at Law, for Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc., et al.

Keith B. Nichols, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Samuel S. Kohn, Attorney at Law, for Friday Investments, LLC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st of July 2016 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of July 2016 by Defendants to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.
STATE of North Carolina v. Sylvester Eugene HARDING, III.

No. 402P11-7.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2016.

Jonathan Shaw, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Sylvester Eugene Harding, for Harding, Sylvester Eugene.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*747*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 1st of April 2016 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cumberland County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of April 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 1st of April 2016 in this matter for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cumberland County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of April 2016."
1240.

#### Central of Georgia Railway Company *v.*Barfield.

Action for damages, from city court of Amerieus — Judge Crisp.. April 29, 1908.

Submitted July 17, 1908.

Decided January 27, 1909.

*E. A. Hawkins, J. B. Hudson,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. P. Wallis, Dykes & Nisbet,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

1. The rules of law illustrating the three issues of negligence made by the evidence,— (1) whether the plaintiff was, at the time of his injury, a trespasser; (2) whether he was a licensee; and (3) the relative negligence of both plaintiif and defendant, — were fully, clearly, and accurately submitted to the jury.

2. There is evidence to support the verdict, whether the plaintiff was a trespasser, or a licensee, or was himself guilty of such contributory negligence as was. sufficient to reduce the amount of his damages, though not sufficient, in connection with the greater negligence of the defendant,, to defeat his recovery.

3. The two special assignments of error are without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136745 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

FRANCES HOLMES,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136745 

 COA: 281446 

WCAC: 06-000196 

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 13, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
INN OF THE MOUNTAIN GODS RESORT AND CASINO
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Daniel McCueBy:
    Daniel McCueTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FC Financial Services, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Tara Chebountchak,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of April, 2005.



| | /s/ Taras Chebountchak                             
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Taras Chebountchak                                 
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41550

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRED NIMOY CEASAR

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:03-CR-45-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Fred Nimoy Ceasar has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ceasar has not filed a response. Our independent review

of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
**Exhibit 10.10**

**PSS World Medical, Inc.**

**Description of Executive Officer Annual Incentive Bonus Program**

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved an annual incentive bonus program (the “Program”) for its executive officersfor fiscal year 2007. Under the Program, executive officers may earn cash bonus awards based on the Company’s achievement of earnings per share goals and, in some cases, the achievement of operating segment profit and the participant’sachievement of designated critical tasks. The target bonus amounts are expressed as a percentage of base salary (80% for the chief executive officer and a range of 35%-55% for the other executive officers), and actual bonus amounts may range from 0%to 200% of the target amounts, as determined by the Compensation Committee based on actual performance relative to specified Company goals.
STATE of North Carolina v. Manuel Enrique SANTANA, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA16-691

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 7, 2017

AFFIRMED.
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-345-CV

JEFFREY A. BARRON APPELLANT

V.

FIRST CASH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 153 DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY RD

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss

Accelerated Appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be

granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1),

43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.
DELIVERED: September 18, 2008
State of North Carolina v. Nicolas Olivares Pineda

No. 70PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016. June 10, 2016

*ORDER*

The opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case states as follows: "the jury found Pineda guilty of violating N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(a)(1) by trafficking heroin by sale and by delivery." The Record on Appeal, however, reveals that defendant was convicted under N.C.G.S. § 90-95(h)(4). Accordingly, we allow the State's petition for discretionary review for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of the correct statute of conviction.

By order of the Court in Conference, this *9th* day of June, 2016.
In the MATTER OF: A.B., J.B.

No. 81P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

J. Lee Gilliam, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Blackmon, Erica.

Kathleen Arundell Jackson, Attorney at Law, Christopher C. Peace, Attorney at Law, for Mecklenburg County YFS.

Michael N. Tousey, Attorney at Law, for GAL.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of March 2016 by Respondent (Mother) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Amendments to Incentive Plan

Add a new paragraph II(d) as follows:

II.      DEFINITIONS

         (d) A "Change of Control" shall be deemed to have occurred if, as a
result of a single transaction or a series of transactions, (A) and "person" (as
such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), other than a
trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under any employee benefit plan of
the Company or a corporation owed, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders
of the Company (including any nominee corporation that holds shares of the
Company on behalf of the beneficial owners of such corporation), in
substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company,
is or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the
Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing
51% or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding
securities; or (B) the stockholders of the Company approve a merger or
consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or
consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company
outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by
remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the
surviving entity) at least 70% of the combined voting power of the voting
securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after
such merger or consolidation, or the stockholders of the Company approve a plan
of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or
disposition by the Company of all or substantially all the Company's assets.

Add a new paragraph VIII(i) as follows:

VIII.  OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS

         (i) Unless provided to the contrary in any Award, all Awards heretofore
or hereafter issued under the Plan shall vest in full upon a Change of Control.
In the Matter of A.R.P., A.J.P. and S.L.P.

No. COA16-50.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Aug. 2, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 20, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00558

- CV

Edna A. MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT

,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial D istrict Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001

- CI

- 17102 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On July 30, 2015, this court denied both parties’ requests for oral argument submission of this appeal and set this cause for submission on briefs on September 2, 2015. After further reviewing the briefs, this court’s July 30, 2015 order is WITHDRAWN.

The parties’ requests for oral argument are GRANTED, and this appeal is set for formal submission and oral argument before this court on Thursday, December 17, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Karen Angelini, and

Justice Jason Pulliam.

The time for oral argument will be limited to twenty minutes for appellant’s opening argument, twenty minutes for appellee’s arg ument, and ten minutes for appellant’s rebuttal. See

4 th T EX

. A PP

. (S AN A NTONIO ) L OC

. R. 9.1.

If either party no longer wishes to present argument, the party must notify this court in writing within seven days of receiving this notice.

It is so ORDERED on November 20, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO : _

____________________________ ___

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court