alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Automotive
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Arvin Scott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Robert W. Zimmer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Arvin Scott
---------------
Name: Arvin Scott
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 14, 2002


/s/ Robert W. Zimmer
-------------------
Name: Robert W. Zimmer
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 14, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

See also the certification pursuant to Sec. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, which is also attached to this Report.

                                       15
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 





 


 




	Mr. Carl E. Berg      	December 3, 2010





Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC.



10050 Bandley Drive


Cupertino, CA  95014







Re: Share Purchase







Dear Mr. Berg:


 





	
This letter agreement will confirm the sale, effective as of the date set forth above, by Valence Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) to Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC (“Berg & Berg”) of one million six hundred sixty six thousand six hundred sixty seven (1,666,667)  shares (the Shares) of the Company’s common stock at a per share price of $1.20, which represents the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on December 2, 2010, for aggregate consideration of two million dollars ($2,000,000.00).







This letter also confirms Berg & Berg’s instructions to apply the outstanding principal and interest on the $2,500,000 loan dated October 15, 2010, from Berg & Berg to the Company, to the purchase of shares of the Company. The aggregate of the outstanding principal and interest on December 2, 2010, is $2,511,746.58 which provides a sale of two million ninety three thousand one hundred twenty two (2,093,122) shares of the Company’s common stock at a per share price of $1.20, the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on December 2, 2010 .







These Shares were offered and sold in a transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).  Berg & Berg understands that the Shares are “restricted securities” and have not been registered under the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law.  Berg & Berg is acquiring the Shares as principal for its own account and not with a view to or for distributing or reselling such Shares or any part thereof in violation of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law; has no present intention of distributing any of such Shares in violation of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law; and has no direct or indirect arrangement or understandings with any other persons to distribute or regarding the distribution of such Shares in violation of the Securities Act or any applicable state securities law.  Berg & Berg is an “accredited investor” as defined under Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act.















	
Sincerely,

	
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


	  	  
	
VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

	
Berg & Berg, LLC.


	  	  
	
/s/ Ross. A. Goolsby

	
/s/ Carl. E. Berg


	
Ross A. Goolsby

	
Carl E. Berg


	
Chief Financial Officer

	
Managing Member
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 08-0836

IN RE  WEEKLEY HOMES, L.P.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s unopposed emergency motion for stay pending resolution of petition for writ of mandamus, filed October 3, 2008, is granted.   The Order Establishing Procedure for Examination of Computer Hard Drive and Protective Order dated August 25, 2008, in Cause No. 06-07736, styled *HFG Enclave Land Interests, Ltd. v. Enclave at Forney Branch, Ltd., et al.*, in the 134th District Court of Dallas County, Texas, is stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The real party in interest is requested to respond to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on or before 3:00 p.m., October 16, 2008.

3.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this October 06, 2008.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4011 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4011

 To amend title 39, United States Code, to improve the efficiency and 
      competitiveness of mail service within the State of Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2014

   Mr. Issa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to improve the efficiency and 
      competitiveness of mail service within the State of Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alaska Bypass Fair Competition Act 
of 2014''.

SEC. 2. MAIL SERVICE WITHIN THE STATE OF ALASKA.

    (a) Definition of Existing Mainline Carrier.--Section 5402(a)(12) 
of title 39, United States Code, is amended by striking ``on January 1, 
2001,'' and inserting ``for each of the preceding 36 months''.
    (b) Definition of New Carrier.--Section 5402(a)(15)(B) of title 39, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(B) has been providing nonpriority bypass mail 
                service on a city pair route in the State of Alaska for 
                fewer than 36 consecutive months in the immediately 
                preceding period; and''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 4.1


 


FORM OF SHARE CERTIFICATE


 


Macrocure Ltd.


 





	Number	Shares
	 	 
	MCUR	CUSIP



 


See Reverse for

Certain Definitions


 


MACROCURE LTD.

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL


 


THIS CERTIFIES that


 





	 






 


is the Registered Holder of


 


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE ORDINARY

SHARES OF NIS 0.01 PAR VALUE EACH


 


of Macrocure Ltd. transferable on the books of the Company by
the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney only upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed or with an
appropriate instrument of transfer. This Certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to
all the provisions of the Articles of Association of the Company and amendments thereto, to all of which the holder by the acceptance
hereof assents. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused
this Certificate to be issued under the facsimile seal of the Company.


 





	Dated:	 	 



 





	Macrocure Ltd. Corporate Seal	ISRAEL
	 	 
	Chairman	Chief Executive Officer



 


 



    	 



    	 



    

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on
the face of this Certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:


 


	TEN COM - 	as tenants in common	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
	TEN ENT - 	as tenants by the entireties	Custodian 	(Cust) (Minor)
	JT TEN - 	as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as
    tenants in common	 
	 	(State)


Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the
above list.


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED,                        
 HEREBY SELLS, ASSIGNS AND TRANSFERS UNTO 





	 	 
	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 






 


 


PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL
ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE


 


                                          
  SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE, AND SO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTES AND APPOINTS ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE
SAID SHARES ON THE BOOKS OF THE WITHIN-NAMED CORPORATION AND FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES.


 





	DATED	 	 



 


 


 






 


	 	 	 
	 	 	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE, WHATSOEVER.






 


Signature(s) Guaranteed:


 





	 	 	 
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17 Ad-15.	 	 







    	2
State of North Carolina v. Donald Lee Curtis

No. 122A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed December 21, 2016

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Sherri Horner Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Narendra K. Ghosh, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Morris Leavett STITH

No. 173A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2017

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Charles G. Whitehead, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Kimberly P. Hoppin for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2008313EN.01003401.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/34

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 October 2008 — Kaloudis v OHIM — Fédération française de tennis (RolandGarros SPORTSWEAR)

(Case T-380/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark RolandGarros SPORTSWEAR - Previous national word mark Roland Garros - Late payment of the appeal fees - Decision of the Board of Appeal deeming the action to be unfounded)

(2008/C 313/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Dimitrios Kaloudis (Dassia, Greece) (represented by: G. Kaloudis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Fédération française de tennis (FFT) (Paris, France) (represented by: F. Fajgenbaum, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2007 (Case R 876/2006-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Fédération française de tennis (FFT) and Mr Dimitrios Kaloudis.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action is as being in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law and in part manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action is as being in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law and in part manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Orders Mr Dimitrios Kaloudis to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Dimitrios Kaloudis to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

On 02 September 2005, in accordance with PL 104-106, Title XXIX, Subtitle A, entitled “Illinois Land Conservation Act of 1995”, the Department of the Army signed a Secretariat Memorandum to transfer approximately 2,640 Acres of land at Joliet Army Ammunition Plant, Illinois to the Department of Agriculture for use by the Forest Service as the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. The purpose of this notice is to effect that transfer pursuant to the provisions of Section 2912(e)(2) of PL 104-106. 

This is a partial transfer of the entire acreage contemplated by the statute. Additional transfers will be made in the future. A map entitled “2004 USDA Assignment Parcel Locator Map” and legal descriptions of the MFG area revised 18 January 2005 and of the LAP area revised 11 August 2005 of the property which is the subject of the partial transfer are on file with the U.S. Army Engineer District, Corps of Engineers, Louisville, Kentucky and the Office of the Regional Forester, USDA, Forest Service. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Albert J. Edwardo, 502-315-6969. 

# ADDRESSES:

Documents are on file at locations: 

1. U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville, Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 59, Louisville, Kentucky 40201-0059. 

2. Office of the Regional Forester, USDA, Forest Service, 626 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 800, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None. 

Michael G. Barter, 

Chief, Real Estate Division. 

[FR Doc. 05-19217 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710-92-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Thurman HALL.

No. 176P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Mark Montgomery, for Hall, Michael Thurman.

Laura E. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Ashley Welch, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 26th of May 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th of May 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
STATE of North Carolina v. John Louis ANDREWS, III

No. COA 16-772

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 21, 2017

VACATED AND REMANDED.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SouthCrest
      Financial Group, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      for
      the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “ Periodic
      Report ”),
      the
      undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
      to
      Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his individual knowledge and
      belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 14 ,
      2005


/s/
                Larry T. KuglarLarry
                T. KuglarChief
                Executive Officer
# C_2008022EN.01001702.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 November 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-263/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Incorrect transposition - Directive 96/61/EC - Article 9(4) - Article 13(1) - Annex I - Integrated pollution prevention and control - Concepts of ‘application of the best available techniques’ and ‘periodic reconsideration of the conditions for an operating permit’)

(2008/C 22/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-B. Laignelot, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Incorrect transposition of Articles 9(4) and 13(1) of Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (OJ 1996 L 257, p. 26) and of Annex I thereto — Concepts of application of the ‘best available techniques’ and ‘periodic reconsideration’ of the conditions for an operating permit

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing correctly to transpose Articles 9(4) and 13(1) of Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, and of Annex I thereto, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing correctly to transpose Articles 9(4) and 13(1) of Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, and of Annex I thereto, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211 of 8.9.2007.

1

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3974 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the TRICARE Program 

for adult children of members and former members of the uniformed 

services, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2014 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the 

TRICARE Program for adult children of members and 

former members of the uniformed services, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENROLLMENT OF ADULT CHILDREN UNDER 

4 TRICARE PROGRAM PLAN OF SPONSOR. 

5 (a) INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE.— 

6 (1) CHILDREN.—Subparagraph (D) of section 

7 1072(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amend8 ed— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3974 IH

1 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘21;’’ and in2 serting ‘‘26; or’’; 

3 (B) by striking clause (ii); 

4 (C) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause 

5 (ii); and 

6 (D) in clause (ii), as redesignated by sub7 paragraph (C), by striking ‘‘or (ii)’’. 

8 (2) CUSTODIAL DEPENDENTS.—Clause (ii) of 

9 section 1072(2)(I) of such title is amended— 

10 (A) in subclause (I), by striking ‘‘21;’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘26; or’’; 

12 (B) by striking subclause (II); 

13 (C) by redesignating subclause (III) as 

14 subclause (II); and 

15 (D) in subclause (II), as redesignated by 

16 subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or (II)’’. 

17 (3) CERTAIN CHILDREN WHO SURVIVE SPON18 SOR.— 

19 (A) Section 1076a(k) of such title is 

20 amended by striking paragraph (3). 

21 (B) Section 1079(g) of such title is amend22 ed— 

23 (i) in paragraph (1), by striking 

24 ‘‘When a member dies’’ and inserting ‘‘ExVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:57 Feb 01, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3974.IH H3974

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3974 IH

1 cept as provided by paragraph (2), when a 

2 member dies’’; 

3 (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking 

4 ‘‘shall be the longer’’ and all that follows 

5 through ‘‘attains 23 years of age’’ and in6 serting ‘‘shall be the period ending on the 

7 date on which such dependent attains 26 

8 years of age’’; 

9 (iii) by striking paragraph (3); and 

10 (iv) by redesignating paragraphs (4) 

11 and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respec12 tively. 

13 (b) CONFORMING REPEAL.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1110b of such title 

15 is repealed. 

16 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec17 tions of chapter 55 of such title is amended by strik18 ing the item relating to section 1110b. 

19 (c) OFFSET.—It is the sense of Congress that any 

20 increase in expenditures of funds by reason of the enact21 ment of this Act should be fully offset by reducing expend22 itures of funds for United States foreign assistance pro23 grams (other than United States foreign assistance pro24 grams for Israel). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Nevsun Resources Ltd.



We consent to the use of the following reports included in the annual report on Form 40-F of Nevsun Resources Ltd.:

1.

Auditors' Report to the Shareholders of Nevsun Resources Ltd. dated February 24, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the consolidated statements of operations and deficit and cash flows for the years then ended; and

2.

Auditors' Report to the Board of Directors of Nevsun Resources Ltd. dated February 24, 2005, with respect to the supplemental note entitled "Reconciliation with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles".





/s/ KPMG LLP



Chartered Accountants



Vancouver, Canada

February 24, 2005



KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadian

member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.