alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the MATTER OF: A.E.C.

82PA15-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 24, 2017

Joyce L. Terres, Assistant Appellate Defender, for McCoy, James.

Beth Hall, GAL Attorney Advocate, for GAL.

Elizabeth Kennedy-Gurney, Attorney at Law, Christopher L. Carr, Attorney at Law, for Cumberland County DSS.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 21st of April 2017 by Respondent-Appellee:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of April 2017."

Respondent-Appellee shall have up to and including the 5th day of June 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
STATE v. Jeffrey Robert PARISI

65P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 24, 2017

John W. Congleton, Assistant Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Michele Goldman, Attorney at Law, for Parisi, Jeffrey Robert.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of February 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of February 2017."
STATE v. Rocky Kurt WILLIAMSON

66P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 27, 2017

Ms. Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Rocky Kurt Williamson.

Mr. James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

Ms. Amanda Tomblyn, for Rocky Kurt Williamson.

Ms. Kathryn E. Hathcock, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of February 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of February 2017."
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Douglas P. Teitelbaum, as a Manager and Principal ExecutiveOfficer of BH/RE, L.L.C., a Nevada limited liability company (the “Company”),certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(A)  theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(B)  the informationin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  August 15,  2005 |                                   |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                               |                                   |
|                               |                                   |
|                               | /S/ Douglas P.  Teitelbaum             |   |
|                               | Douglas P. Teitelbaum                  |
|                               | Manager (Principal  Executive Officer) |

 

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4011 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to improve the efficiency and 

competitiveness of mail service within the State of Alaska. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2014 

Mr. ISSA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to improve the 

efficiency and competitiveness of mail service within the 

State of Alaska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Bypass Fair 

5 Competition Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAIL SERVICE WITHIN THE STATE OF ALASKA. 

7 (a) DEFINITION OF EXISTING MAINLINE CARRIER.— 

8 Section 5402(a)(12) of title 39, United States Code, is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘on January 1, 2001,’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘for each of the preceding 36 months’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4011 IH

1 (b) DEFINITION OF NEW CARRIER.—Section 

2 5402(a)(15)(B) of title 39, United States Code, is amend3 ed to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(B) has been providing nonpriority bypass 

5 mail service on a city pair route in the State of 

6 Alaska for fewer than 36 consecutive months in 

7 the immediately preceding period; and’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT28**CONSENT OF D. KAPPES**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following report and documents,which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statementon Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission: 1. The technical report dated March 31, 2006, entitled “Technical Report NI43-101FI Los Filos Project, Mexico” (the “Los Filos Report”); and  2. The annual information form of the Company dated March 30, 2007, which includesreference to my name in connection with information relating to the Los Filos Report,and the properties described therein.March 30, 2007/s/ D. Kappes
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of UAP Holding Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended November 27, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David W. Bullock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



Date: January 11, 2006



By:

/s/  David W. BullockDavid W. BullockExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
Patrick A. Merrill, Plaintiff, v. Winston-Salem Forsyth County Board of Education, Defendant.

No. COA16-232

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 18, 2016

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group, Subcommittee G--Education.
    Date: March 15-16, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Select, 480 King Street, Alexandria, VA 
22314.
    Contact Person: Ilda M. McKenna, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Research Training Review Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 8111, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7481, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abc6c8c0cec5c5cac2ebc6cac2c785c5c2c385ccc4dd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f323c343a31313e361f323e36337131363771383029">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-1838 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Robert Giardina, Chief Executive Officer of Town Sports International Holdings, Inc., certifythat:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Town Sports International Holdings,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information includedin this quarterly report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;
          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting;
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reports, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting;
Date: May 3, 2005     By: /s/ Robert Giardina        Robert Giardina   *Chief Executive Office*   *Office of the President*
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the quarterly report of Town SportsInternational Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for thethree month period ended June 30, 2006 filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Richard Pyle, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    represents, in all material respects, the financial condition    and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Richard Pyle   *Town Sports International Holdings, Inc.* *Chief Financial Officer*August 10, 2006
37
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 95-40427 Summary Calendar

_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PEDRO AGUILAR, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:94-CR-94

_________________________________________________________________ April 16, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Pedro Aguilar, Jr., appeals his sentence of 34 months' imprisonment for posses sion of marijuana with the intent to
distribute it. He argues that the district court erred in including information as relevant conduct and by enhancing his offense level for possession of a firearm.

We have reviewed the record and the brief, and we conclude that the district court did not err. The information objected to

as rele vant conduct was either harmlessly included or included-2-

without clear error. S ee United States v. Kings , 981 F.2d 790, 795
n.11 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 113 S.Ct. 2450 (1993); United States

v . Bethley , 973 F.2d 396, 401 (5th Cir. 1992), c ert. denied , 507
U.S. 935 (1993). The enhancement for Aguilar's possession of firearms was also not clearly erroneous. United States v. Paulk , 917 F.2d 879, 882 (5th Cir. 1990).

A F F I R M E D.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41207

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARICELA CANOA-CORRALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:07-CR-30-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Maricela Canoa-Corrales appeals her 18-month sentence following her

guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation. The district court applied an

eight level enhancement to Canoa-Corrales’s offense level pursuant to U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) because she had a prior theft

conviction. Canoa-Corrales argues that this prior conviction is not an

aggravated felony under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) because her sentence was suspended

except for 108 days of time served.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 30, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-41207

2

The definition of “aggravated felony” adopted by the Guidelines from 8

U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43), as interpreted in United States v. Banda-Zamora, 178 F.3d

728, 730 (5th Cir. 1999), applies, and the calculation considers the period of

incarceration without regard to any suspension of the sentence, in whole or in

part. See Banda-Zamora, 178 F.3d at 730; § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) cmt. n.3. The fact

that Canoa-Corrales’s sentence for theft was suspended exceptfor 108 days does

not change the fact that it meets the definition of an aggravated felony in §

1101(a)(43). Thus, the district court did not err in applying the § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C)

enhancement. See United States v. Armendariz, 451 F.3d 352, 357 (5th Cir.

2006). 

AFFIRMED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129856 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129856 

 COA: 254639 
 Wayne CC: 03-011072-01 

LESLIE GORDON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0221 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2006 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                         975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FC Financial Services, Inc.(the "Company") on the Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Taras Chebountchak,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of April, 2006.



| | TARAS CHEBOUNTCHAK                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Taras Chebountchak                                 
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





















---
STATE v. Avery Joe LAIL, Jr.

47P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Lail, Avery Joe (Jr.).

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

David J. Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney General, Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of February 2017 by State of NC:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
# C_2008285EN.01003401.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/34

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 September 2008 — Angé Serrano and Others v Parliament

(Case T-47/05) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Success in internal competitions for change of category under the Staff Regulations - Entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Transitory rules for classification in grade - Changes to levels of hierarchy under the old Staff Regulations - Admissibility - Plea of illegality - Acquired rights - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Principle of sound administration and duty of care)

(2008/C 285/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Pilar Angé Serrano (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Jean-Marie Bras (Luxembourg), Dominiek Decoutere (Wolwelange, Luxembourg), Armin Hau (Luxembourg), Adolfo Orcajo Teresa (Brussels, Belgium) and Francisco Javier Solana Ramos (Brussels), represented by É. Boigelot, lawyer.

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: initially, L. Knudsen, A. Bencomo Weber and K. Zejdova, and subsequently by L. Knudsen and K. Zejdova)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Sims and I. Sulce, and subsequently I. Sulce and M. Sims, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the defendant

Re:

Application for annulment of the individual decisions containing the applicants' classification in the intermediate grade from 1 May 2004 and communicated to them, by letter from the Director General for Personnel of the European Parliament, during the first week of May 2004, and of any act consecutive to and/or relating to those decisions, even ones adopted subsequent to the present action, and an application to order the European Parliament to pay damages and interest.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Finds that there is no need to adjudicate in respect of Angé Serrano and Bras and Orcajo Teresa as regards the first head of claim; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Finds that there is no need to adjudicate in respect of Angé Serrano and Bras and Orcajo Teresa as regards the first head of claim;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Angé Serrano and Bras and Orcajo; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Angé Serrano and Bras and Orcajo;

| 4. | Orders Dominiek Decoutere, Armin Hau and Francisco Javier Solana to bear their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Dominiek Decoutere, Armin Hau and Francisco Javier Solana to bear their own costs;

| 5. | Orders the Council to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the Council to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.

1

---