alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4014 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former Members of 

Congress from engaging in lobbying contacts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2014 

Mr. CICILLINE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former 

Members of Congress from engaging in lobbying contacts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON LOBBYING CONTACTS BY 

4 FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 207(e) of title 18, United 

6 States Code, is amended as follows: 

7 (1) Paragraph (1) is amended to read as fol8 lows: 

9 ‘‘(1) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.— 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4014 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any person who is a 

2 Senator or a Member of the House of Rep3 resentatives and who, after that person leaves 

4 office, knowingly makes any lobbying contact to 

5 a covered executive branch official, or to any 

6 Member, officer, or employee of either House of 

7 Congress, shall be punished as provided in sec8 tion 216 of this title. 

9 ‘‘(B) DEFINITIONS.—In this paragraph, 

10 the terms ‘lobbying contact’ and ‘covered execu11 tive branch official’ have the meanings given 

12 those terms in section 3 of the Lobbying Disclo13 sure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1602).’’. 

14 (2) Paragraph (2) is amended— 

15 (A) by striking ‘‘(2) Any person’’ and in16 serting the following: 

17 ‘‘(2) OFFICERS AND CERTAIN STAFF.— 

18 ‘‘(A) OFFICERS AND STAFF OF THE SEN19 ATE.—Any person’’; and 

20 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(B) OFFICERS OF THE HOUSE OF REP22 RESENTATIVES.—(i) Any person who is an 

23 elected officer of the House of Representatives 

24 and who, within 1 year after that person leaves 

25 office, knowingly makes, with the intent to inVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:11 Feb 07, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4014.IH H4014

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4014 IH

1 fluence, any communication to or appearance 

2 before any of the persons described in clause 

3 (ii), on behalf of any other person (except the 

4 United States) in connection with any matter 

5 on which such elected officer seeks action by a 

6 Member, officer, or employee of either House of 

7 Congress, in his or her official capacity, shall be 

8 punished as provided in section 216 of this title. 

9 ‘‘(ii) The persons referred to in clause (i) 

10 with respect to appearances or communications 

11 by a former elected officer are any Member, of12 ficer, or employee of the House of Representa13 tives.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to individuals who leave office 

16 or employment to which such amendments apply on or 

17 after the date of adjournment of the second session of the 

18 113th Congress sine die or December 31, 2014, whichever 

19 date is earlier. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2008022EN.01002501.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 5 November 2007 — Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA) v Consorzio Agrario di Ravenna Soc. Coop. Arl

(Case C-486/07)

(2008/C 22/47)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte Suprema di Cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA)

Applicant:

Defendant: Consorzio Agrario di Ravenna Soc. Coop. Arl

Defendant:

Question referred

‘On the basis of the EEC regulations in force at the time of the facts of the case (1994 to 1995) on the sale of cereals held by intervention agencies, do the price reductions laid down in respect of the presence of a higher moisture content than that of the standard quality apply also to the sale of maize?’

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David A. Smith                                            
|David A. Smith                                                
|Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer

May 20, 2009
T AND A AMUSEMENTS, LLC; and Crazie Overstock Promotions, LLC v. Patrick MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina; Frank L. Perry, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety; Mark J. Senter, in his official capacity as Branch Head of the Alcohol Law Enforcement Division, Jody Williams, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police of the City of Asheboro, North Carolina; and Maynard B. Reid, Jr., in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Randolph County

No. 89P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

William J. Brian, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Keith P. Anthony, Attorney at Law, *623Durham, for T and A Amusements, LLC, et al.

Shannon R. Joseph, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.

Hal F. Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General, J. Joy Strickland, Assistant Attorney General, for McCrory, Patrick (Governor), et al.

Patrick H. Flanagan, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Williams, Jody (Chief of Police).

Ben C. Morgan, Attorney at Law, Asheboro, for Reid, Maynard B. (Jr.) (Sheriff).

Christopher C. Finan, Attorney at Law, High Point.

James C. Lanik, Attorney at Law, High Point.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th of March 2017 by Defendants (McCrory, Perry, Senter, and Williams) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."
NEXT ADVISOR CONTINUED, INC. v. LENDINGTREE, INC., et al.

391A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2016

Russell F. Sizemore, Attorney at Law, Jonathan M. Watkins, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Mary Cabell Clay, Attorney at Law, Glenn E. Ketner, III, Attorney at Law, Scott M. Tyler, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Lendingtree, Inc., et al.

Christopher G. Smith, Attorney at Law, Susan H. Hargrove, Attorney at Law, Isaac A. Linnartz, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Next Advisor Continued, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 1st of December 2016 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of December 2016."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 6th day of January 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4073 

To amend the Real ID Act of 2005 to repeal provisions requiring uniform 

State driver’s licenses and State identification cards, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2014 

Mr. DAINES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Real ID Act of 2005 to repeal provisions 

requiring uniform State driver’s licenses and State identification cards, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repeal ID Act of 

5 2014’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4073 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENTS FOR UNIFORM STATE 

2 DRIVER’S LICENSES AND STATE IDENTIFICA3 TION CARDS. 

4 (a) REPEAL.—Title II of the Real ID Act of 2005 

5 (49 U.S.C. 30301 note) is repealed. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

7 (1) TITLE 18, U.S.C.—Section 1028(a)(8) of 

8 title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘false or actual authentication features’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘false identification features’’. 

11 (2) INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM

12 PREVENTION ACT OF 2004.—Section 7212 of the In13 telligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 

14 2004 (Public Law 108–458) is amended to read as 

15 if section 206 of the Real ID Act, as in effect on the 

16 date of the enactment of that Act, were not enacted. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CORWIN v. BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO PLC, et al.

56P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 20, 2017

Alan W. Duncan, Attorney at Law, Stephen M. Russell, Jr., Attorney at Law, Jason M. Leviton, Attorney at Law, Joel A. Fleming, Attorney at Law, for Corwin, Robert (Dr.), et al.

Michael L. Robinson, Attorney at Law, H. Brent Helms, Attorney at Law, Gary A. Bornstein, Attorney at Law, for British American Tobacco PLC.

Ronald R. Davis, Attorney at Law, W. Andrew Copenhaver, Attorney at Law, James A. Dean, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Robert C. Micheletto, Attorney at Law, Thomas E. Lynch, Attorney at Law, Andrew S. Kleinfeld, Attorney at Law, for Reynolds American, Inc., et al.

James P. McLoughlin, Jr., Attorney at Law, Mark A. Nebrig, Attorney at Law, Jonathan M. Watkins, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Karen Seymour, Attorney at Law, Frank Schall, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Jobin, Luc, et al.

Morgan, J. For the Court

Dear Mr. Helms:

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of February 2017 by Defendant (British American Tobacco, PLC) for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of February 2017."
State of North Carolina v. William Gerald Price

No. 133P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

William Gerald Price, for Price, William Gerald.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 12th of April 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th of April 2016 by Defendant in this matter discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to for G.S. 7A-31, following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of the Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
# Official Journal L 202/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 202 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5710 July 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 202

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5710 July 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 737/2014 of 24 June 2014 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for 2-phenylphenol, chlormequat, cyflufenamid, cyfluthrin, dicamba, fluopicolide, flutriafol, fosetyl, indoxacarb, isoprothiolane, mandipropamid, metaldehyde, metconazole, phosmet, picloram, propyzamide, pyriproxyfen, saflufenacil, spinosad and trifloxystrobin in or on certain products (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 737/2014 of 24 June 2014 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for 2-phenylphenol, chlormequat, cyflufenamid, cyfluthrin, dicamba, fluopicolide, flutriafol, fosetyl, indoxacarb, isoprothiolane, mandipropamid, metaldehyde, metconazole, phosmet, picloram, propyzamide, pyriproxyfen, saflufenacil, spinosad and trifloxystrobin in or on certain products (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24
- 6324

DENNIS KEITH SMITH, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SGT. ROGERS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; LT. JONES, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; COL. VERGAKIS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; NURSE WERMTER, Well Path Medical Services; WELL PATH MEDICAL SERVICES; HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Jamar Kentrell Walker , District Judge. ( 2:23

- cv - 00248

- JKW

- RJK )

Submitted : September 1 2 , 2024 Decided: September 16, 2024

Before THACKER and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Dennis Keith Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6324 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Virginia inmate Dennis Keith Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice Smith ’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon initial review of Smith’s complaint, the court was unable to determine whether Smith had stated cognizable claims against each Defendant individually. The court therefore ordered Smith to amend his complaint with particul arized allegations within 21 days and warned him that, if he failed do so, the court would dismiss the action without prejudice. Sixty

- one days l ater, with no response from Smith, the court dismissed the action without prejudice. Smith appealed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The court warned Smith of the consequences of failing to amend his complaint. Further, the dismissal without prejudice permits Smith to refile. Finally, Smith’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the court’s dismissal. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Smith v. Rogers , No. 2:23

- cv - 00248

- JKW

- RJK (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2024)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions a re adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 24-6324 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.0**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.**‘**1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO****SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”)of TF Financial Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission, we, Kent C. Lufkin, President and Chief Executive Officer,and Dennis R. Stewart, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ‘1350, asadopted pursuant to ‘906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Kent C.  Lufkin                    |                                                  | /s/ Dennis R. Stewart |   |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Kent C.  Lufkin                        | Dennis R. Stewart                                     |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer | Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                   |                                                  |
|                                   |                                                  |
| March 30,  2006                   |                                                  |

 

1

----
In re Appeal by: Toney L. HARRELL and T.L. Harrell's Land Development Co., Inc. v. The MIDLAND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and The Town of Midland

No. 64P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2017

Anthony Fox, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Benjamin R. Sullivan, Jr., Attorney at Law, Nicolas E. Tosco, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Town of Midland.

John F. Scarbrough, Attorney at Law, James E. Scarbrough, Attorney at Law, Concord, for Harrell, Toney L., et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 8th of March 2017 by Respondent *866(Town of Midland) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."
MEINCK v. CITY OF GASTONIA

130PA17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 14, 2017

Thomas D. Bumgardner, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Meinck, Joan A.

Martha Raymond Thompson, Attorney at Law, Gastonia, Ryan L. Bostic, Attorney at Law, Aaron C. Low, Attorney at Law, Gastonia, for City of Gastonia.

Andrew J. Santaniello, Attorney at Law, Kimberly S. Hibbard, General Counsel, Gregory F. Schwitzgebel, III, Associate General Counsel, for N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of August 2017 by N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys and the N.C. League of Municipalities for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2017."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within *726the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
exh_102.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


 


HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC.


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (“Company”), entered into an Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) with  Robert E. Gagnon (“Executive”) on October 2, 2013; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend such Employment Agreement to modify and extend the term thereunder; and


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to the following, effective immediately:


 



1.  Amendments.  Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:


 




“           1. Employment.  The term of this Agreement shall extend from October 23, 2013 (the “Commencement Date”) until August 26, 2016; provided, however, that the term of this Agreement shall automatically be extended for two additional years following the end of the term then in effect unless, not less than 90 days prior to each such date, either party shall have given written notice to the other that it does not wish to extend this Agreement; provided, further, that if a Change in Control occurs during the original or extended term of this Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall, notwithstanding anything in this sentence to the contrary, continue in effect for a period of not less than twelve (12) months beyond the month in which the Change in Control occurred. The term of this Agreement shall be subject to termination as provided in Paragraph 7 and may be referred to herein as the “Period of Employment.”


 


2.  Successor to Company. The Company shall require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Company expressly to assume and agree to perform this agreement to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform it if no succession had taken place. Failure of the Company to obtain an assumption of this agreement at or prior to the effectiveness of any succession shall be a breach of this agreement and the Agreement and shall constitute Good Reason (as defined under the Agreement) if the Executive elects to terminate employment.


 


3.  Counterparts. This agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.


 


 [signatures on following page]


 




  





  











  






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of this 30th day of July, 2014.












HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC.







By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Duchemin


Name: Jeffrey A. Duchemin


Title: Chief Executive Officer







EXECUTIVE







/s/ Robert E. Gagnon


Robert E. Gagnon, individually
STATE of North Carolina v. Rebecca Ellen CRAIN, Defendant.

No. COA16-844

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 16, 2017

NO ERROR.
Fred Passmore, Employee, Plaintiff, v. National Retail Systems, Inc., Employer, The Hartford, Carrier (Tristar Risk Management, Third-Party Administrator), Defendants.

No. COA16-141

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

AFFIRMED.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00085-CV

IN RE WAYNE ERNEST BARKER

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Wayne Ernest Barker, an inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. There 

are procedural problems with the petition, but we use Rule 2 to look beyond those 

problems and deny the petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

Further, absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing 

fees at the time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to 

TEX. R. APP. P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See 

also TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 

51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005); and § 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2009). Under these 

circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing 
In re Barker Page 2

fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable 

of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed by Barker.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed March 10, 2010

[OT06]