alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3856 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 2-year extension 

of the exclusion from gross income for the discharge of qualified principal 

residence indebtedness, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2014 

Mr. FOSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a 2-year extension of the exclusion from gross income 

for the discharge of qualified principal residence indebtedness, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeowners Debt Re5 lief Extension Act of 2014’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3856 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME 

2 OF DISCHARGE OF QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL 

3 RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (E) of section 

5 108(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend6 ed by striking ‘‘January 1, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘January 

7 1, 2016’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to indebtedness discharged after 

10 December 31, 2013. 

11 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON SECTION 199 DEDUCTION ATTRIB12 UTABLE TO OIL, NATURAL GAS, OR PRIMARY 

13 PRODUCTS THEREOF. 

14 (a) DENIAL OF DEDUCTION.—Paragraph (4) of sec15 tion 199(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

16 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara17 graph: 

18 ‘‘(E) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN OIL

19 AND GAS INCOME.—In the case of any taxpayer 

20 who is a major integrated oil company (as de21 fined in section 167(h)(5)(B)) for the taxable 

22 year, the term ‘domestic production gross re23 ceipts’ shall not include gross receipts from the 

24 production, transportation, or distribution of 

25 oil, natural gas, or any primary product (within 

26 the meaning of subsection (d)(9)) thereof.’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3856 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2013. 

4 SEC. 4. DEBT REDUCTION. 

5 The net amount of any savings realized as a result 

6 of the enactment of this Act and the amendments made 

7 by this Act shall be deposited in the Treasury of the 

8 United States and used only to redeem outstanding Fed9 eral debt. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2009282EN.01000601.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 October 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Minister voor Wonen, Wijken en Integratie v Woningstichting Sint Servatius

(Case C-567/07) (1)

1

(Free movement of capital - Article 56 EC - Restrictions - Justification - Housing policy - Services of general economic interest)

2009/C 282/09

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Minister voor Wonen, Wijken en Integratie

Applicant:

Defendant: Woningstichting Sint Servatius

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Raad van State — Interpretation of Articles 56 EC, 58 EC, 86(2) EC, 87 EC and 88 EC — National legislation which, in the absence of prior authorisation by the Minister concerned, prohibits cross-border activities on the part of an undertaking required by statute to operate in furtherance of the housing policy of the Member State in question — Housing policy and public interest

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 EC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes the exercise of cross-frontier activities of institutions approved under Article 70(1) of the Housing Law (Woningwet) in relation to housing matters subject to prior administrative authorisation, in so far as such legislation is not based on objective, non-discriminatory criteria which are known in advance and which are capable of adequately circumscribing the exercise by the national authorities of their discretion, a matter which falls to be determined by the national court.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.

1

---
Dismissal and Opinion Filed June 21, 2013 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00778-CR 

KEVIN SHARONE MENNIEFEE, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court 

Kaufman County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 28736-86 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lang-Miers 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Kevin Sharone Menniefee was convicted of attempted hindering the apprehension or 

prosecution of a known felon. See TEX. PEN. CODE ANN. §§ 15.01(a), (d), 38.05(a), (d) (West 

2011). Pursuant to a plea agreement, punishment was assessed at fourteen months’ confinement 

in a state jail, and was imposed in open court on July 20, 2011. The trial court certified that 

appellant does not have the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 

S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Moreover, appellant’s June 6, 2013 notice of appeal is 

 
 –2– 

untimely as to the July 20, 2011 sentencing date. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). 

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

130778F.U05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

KEVIN SHARONE MENNIEFEE, 

Appellant 

No. 05-13-00778-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District 

Court, Kaufman County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 28736-86. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Moseley and Lang-Miers 

participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. 

Judgment entered June 21, 2013 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Natural Resources Conservation Service 

# AGENCY:

Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of intent to deauthorization of Federal funding. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, Public Law 83-566, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service                               ( print page 55104)                            Guidelines (7 CFR part 622), the Natural Resources Conservation Service gives notice of the deauthorization of Federal funding for the Broad Creek Watershed project Sussex and Kent Counties, Delaware.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jon F. Hall, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1221 College Park Drive, Suite 100, Dover, Delaware 19904, 302-678-4160. 

## Notice of Intent To Deauthorize Federal Funding 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A determination has been made by Jon F. Hall, State Conservationist, Delaware Natural Resources Conservation Service, that the proposed works of improvement for the Broad Creek Watershed project will not be installed. The sponsoring local organizations have concurred in this determination and agree that Federal funding should be deauthorized for the project. Information regarding this determination may be obtained at the above address and telephone number. 

                    No administrative action on implementation of the proposed deauthorization will be taken until 60 days after the date of this publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: September 12, 2005. 

Jon F. Hall, 

State Conservationist. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-95 regarding State and local clearinghouse review of Federal and federally assisted programs and projects is applicable)

[FR Doc. 05-18702 Filed 9-19-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
McKenzie v. Horne

327P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Mr. Eugene Elliott McKenzie, Pro Se.

Mr. Ernie Lee, District Attorney, For State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st of August 2016 by Petitioner to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 (the “Report”) of Hercules Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Manuel A. Henriquez, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| Date: August 3, 2017 | By:    | /S/ MANUEL A. HENRIQUEZ

                                   |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Manuel A. Henriquez                                              |
|                 |   | Chairman, President, and                                         |
|                 |   | Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136553 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136553 

 COA: 272994 

Jackson CC: 06-003382-FC 

GARY SHAWN LUSTIG,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 10, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such quarter and the results of operations of the Registrant for such quarter.







Date:April 29, 2016/s/ George F. TidmarshGeorge F. Tidmarsh, M.D., Ph.D.President, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary/s/ Dennis M. MulroyDennis M. MulroyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)








Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and will be retained by La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. Grady Lee NICHOLSON.

No. 238P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Grady Lee Nicholson, Salisbury, for Nicholson, Grady Lee.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of July 2015 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
exhibitfour.htm




Incorporated Under the Laws of the


State of Delaware







 







 


Number                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Shares


 


 


 


Common Stock                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Growblox Sciences, Inc.                                                                                                                                                           250,000,000 Authorized Shar


 


 


Cusip 399847 10 2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  par value $.0001







THIS CERTIFIES THAT







IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF







Shares of Growblox Sciences, Inc. Common Stock


transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.  This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.







Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.












Secretary                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                SEAL                                                                                                                                                                                    Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2005, of CKE
Restaurants, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Theodore Abajian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 780(d)); and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. In witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this certificate as of the date
set forth opposite his signature below. Date: April 21, 2005
    /s/ Theodore AbajianTheodore AbajianChief Financial Officer
1652.

#### Daniel *v.*The State.

Conviction of assault with intent to rape, from Appling superior court — Judge Whipple. November 3, 1908.

Submitted February 9,

Decided March 16, 1909.

*King & Sellers,*for plaintiff in error.

*John W. Bennett, solicitor-general,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

No material error appears, and the evidence fully warrants the verdict. *Judgment affirmed.*
CATAWBA COUNTY, et al. v. LOGGINS

152PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 15, 2016

J. David Abernethy, Attorney at Law, David W. Hood, Attorney at Law, Hickory, for Catawba County (by and through its Child Support Agency), et al.

Blair E. Cody, III, Attorney at Law, Hickory, for Loggins, Jason.

John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, Gerald K. Robbins, Special Deputy Attorney General, Benjamin J. Kull, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Department of Health and Human Services.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 14th of November 2016 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of November 2016."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 22nd day of December 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
STATE v. Joshua Ryan WILSON

466A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 27, 2017

Leslie C. Rawls, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Wilson, Joshua Ryan.

Marie Hartwell Evitt, Attorney at Law, Patrick Nadolski, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 23rd of February 2017 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of February 2017."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 15th day of March 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Molly L. Bates, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eduardo Gomezjurado, Defendant-Appellee.

No. COA16-242

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

AFFIRMED.
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 08-6008

 

In re: *

*

Leonard Powell and Margaret Powell, *

*

Debtors. *

*

Joyce Bradley Babin, *

Chapter 13 Trustee, * Appeal from the United States

* Bankruptcy Court for the

Trustee - Appellant, * Western District of Arkansas

*

v. *

*

Leonard Powell and Margaret Powell, *

*

Debtors - Appellees. *

*

Nancy J. Gargula, U.S. Trustee, *

*

Amicus on Behalf of Appellant *

*
2

 

No. 08-6009

 

In re: *

*

Cho Pun Davis, *

*

Debtor. *

*

Joyce Bradley Babin, *

Chapter 13 Trustee, * Appeal from the United States

* Bankruptcy Court for the

Trustee - Appellant, * Western District of Arkansas

*

v. *

*

Cho Pun Davis, *

*

Debtor - Appellee. *

*

Nancy J. Gargula, U.S. Trustee, *

*

Amicus on Behalf of Appellant *

 

Submitted: August 8, 2008

Filed: September 2, 2008

 

Before KRESSEL, Chief Judge, SCHERMER, and MCDONALD, Bankruptcy

Judges

SCHERMER, Bankruptcy Judge
3

The issue raised in these appeals concerns the calculation of a debtor’s

allowable expenses under Section 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) of the Bankruptcy Code. The

specific question addressed is whether above-median income debtors may claim

transportation ownership expense deductions for vehicles owned free and clear of

liens. The Chapter 13 Trustee objected to the confirmation of plans proposed by

Debtors Leonard and Margaret Powell and Cho Pun Davis on the theory that the

debtors were not submitting all projected disposable income to the repayment of

creditors under their plans. The debtors had calculated disposable income by

deducting transportation ownership expenses for vehicles owned free and clear of

liens. The bankruptcy court overruled the objections and confirmed the debtors’

plans. In so doing, the bankruptcy court allowed the debtors deductions for

transportation ownership expenses for vehicles owned free and clear of liens in

calculating disposable income.

This Court has previously addressed this issue in Babin v. Wilson (In re

Wilson), 383 B.R. 729 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2008), wherein this Court concluded that

debtors who do not incur vehicle ownership expenses are not permitted to claim a

deduction for such expenses because such expenses are not allowable under

Section 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) of the Bankruptcy Code. We are bound by the decision

of a prior panel of this Court. United States v. Betcher, ___ F.3d ___, 2008 WL

2796721, at *2 (8th Cir. Jul. 22, 2008); Passmore v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 658, 660 (8th Cir.

2008); Nelson v. Mickelson (In re Pfleghaar), 215 B.R. 394, 396 (B.A.P. 8th Cir.

1997); Luedtke v. Nationsbanc Mortgage Corp. (In re Luedtke), 215 B.R. 390, 391 (8th

Cir. BAP 1997). For the reasons set forth in Babin v. Wilson, we REVERSE the

orders confirming the debtors’ plans.