alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I,  Linda  Putback-Bean,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly  Report  of  Pediatric  Prosthetics,  Inc.  on  Form  10-QSB/A for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 and that
information  contained  in  such  Form  10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material
respects  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Pediatric
Prosthetics,  Inc.


                                     By:/s/ Linda Putback-Bean
                                     --------------------------
                                     Linda Putback-Bean
                                     Chief Executive Officer
December 21, 2006

<PAGE>
Sangster v. Shandles

415P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Curtis Louis Sangster, for Sangster, Curtis L.

Mary D. Winstead, Deputy Counsel, for Shandles, Deborah.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of November 2016 by Plaintiff for Appeal of Decision of the North Carolina State Bar:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
     We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(No.’s 333-64176, 333-102829 and 333-105127)) andForm S-8 (No.’s 333-3070, 333-17209, 333-20939,333-26557, 333-28403, 333-67233 and 333-86817) of ViewpointCorporation of our report dated March 31, 2003 relating tothe consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule which appears in this Form 10-K/A.
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
New York, New YorkJune 5, 2003
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Tidwell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: September 12, 2013  /s/ Paul Tidwell Paul Tidwell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   1
NO. 07-01-0497 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A APRIL15, 2002

______________________________ IN THE INTE REST OF SAMUE L KAHN , A CHILD

_________________________________ FROM THE 72 ND DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 93-542,429; HON ORABLEJ. BLAI R CHER RY, JR., JUDGE

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. Appellant Robert

Alan Kahn perfected an appeal from th e trial court’s order denying his mo tion for clarification and enforcement of a prior order regarding con ser vators hip of Sam uel Kahn. Pending before t his Court is Kahn’s motion to dismiss this ap peal by which he represents that he nolonger wishes toprosecute the m atter because an agreed order has been entered below . W e grant his m otion and dismiss the a ppeal W ithout passing on the me rits of the case, appellant’s request is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. See Te x. R. A pp. P. 42.1(a)( 2). Having dism issed the appeal2

atapp ella nt’s req ues t, n o m otio n fo r re hea ring w ill be entert aine d an d ou r m and atew ill issue forthwith. Don H. Rea vis Justice Do not publish.
Exhibit 10.62
 AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Amendment Employer Employee
 Agreement
 Board
  1.
    
    Section 2(a)(A) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
 Termination; Severance




---



##### 



2.
    
    Section 2(a)(B) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
 provided
 3.
    
    Section 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
  4.
    
    No Other Amendment. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Agreement shall not be
otherwise amended and remains in full force and effect.




---



##### 



LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANYBy:
    
    /s/ Deirdre Y. Gillespie
Deirdre
Y. GillespiePresident & CEOEXECUTIVEJessie Elchico




---



##### 



LA JOLLA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANYBy:
    
    Deirdre
Y. GillespiePresident & CEOEMPLOYEE/s/ Jessie Elchico

Jessie Elchico
# C_2009267EN.01006401.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/64

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 2 September 2009 — E.ON Ruhrgas and E.ON Földgáz Trade v Commission

(Case T-57/07) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Competition - Concentrations - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market - Commitments - Commission letters regarding the commitments - Non-actionable measures - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 267/114

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: E.ON Ruhrgas International AG (Essen, Germany); and E.ON Földgáz Trade Zrt (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: G. Wiedemann and T. Lübbig, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Bouquet and V. Di Bucci, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of the decisions allegedly contained in the Commission’s letters of 19 December 2006 and 16 January 2007 concerning the commitments entered into by E.ON Ruhrgas International AG referred to in Article 3 of the Commission Decision of 21 December 2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.3696 — E.ON/MOL).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders E.ON Ruhrgas International AG and E.ON Földgáz Trade Zrt to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders E.ON Ruhrgas International AG and E.ON Földgáz Trade Zrt to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 185 (Monday, September 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19104]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD


Membership of the Merit Systems Protection Board's Senior 
Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the members of the Performance 
Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Bradley, HR Director, Finance 
and Administrative Management, Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20419.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Merit Systems Protection Board is 
publishing the names of the new and current members of the Performance 
Review Board (PRB) as required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). Deborah Miron, 
William Boulden and Martha Schneider will serve as members. Martha 
Schneider will serve as Chair of the PRB. Gail T. Lovelace will serve 
as a new member.

Bentley M. Roberts, Jr.,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-19104 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7400-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20766

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS DIAZ-FABIAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CR-452-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 11, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Diaz-Fabian appeals from his bench-trial conviction

for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326. Diaz-Fabian contends that the district court

erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of his prior

deportation because his prior deportation proceedings violated

his right to due process. He concedes that the only issue raised

in this appeal is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. 
No. 99-20766

-2-

Benitez-Villafuerte, 186 F.3d 651, 656-60 (5th Cir. 1999), cert.

denied, 120 S. Ct. 838 (2000). The decision of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
1562.

#### Bray *v.*City of Commerce.

Certiorari, from Jackson superior court — Judge Brand. October 31, 1908.

Submitted January 14,

Decided February 9, 1909.

*W. A. Stevenson,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. L. J. Smith,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

On the trial of one charged with a violation of a city ordinance, in having on hand intoxicating liquors for the purpose of illegal sale, proof that the accused received money from another person, accompanied by a request to procure whisky for the latter, and thereafter went off, and in a short time returned and delivered a bottle of whisky to that person, would east on the accused the onus of showing where, how, and from whom he got the whisky. This burden would be successfully carried by the accused if, in eorroboration of his own statement, he proved by an unimpeachod witness that he had in fact bought the whisky from another person and paid him for it. *Grant*v. *State,*87 *Ga.*265 (13 S. E. 554) ; *Mach v. State,*110 *Ga.*546 (42 S. E. 776) ; *Gaskins*v. *State,*127 *Ga.*51 (55 S. E. 1045). *Judgment reversed.*
Serenity FRIESON, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, William Lewis King, and Shonta Daniels, Plaintiffs, v. Mavis K. TURPIN, Executrix of the Estate of Harold R. Turpin, d/b/a Crestview Childcare Center, Defendant.

No. COA15-1094.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 21, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Error.
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
INN OF THE MOUNTAIN GODS RESORT AND CASINO
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Brian D. ParrishBy:
    
    Brian D. ParrishTitle:
    
    Chief Operating Officer and Management
Board Member (Principal Executive Officer)
Order entered April 26, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00413
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M .O., ET AL., CHILDRE N On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 13
- 19769
- Z



### O RDER
Th is is an accelerated appeal in a child protection case

. Pursuant to rule of appellate procedure 34.5(c)(1), we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than Apri l 30, 2019, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the trial court’s July 26, 2018 “Chapter 263” order and August 24, 2018 “extend misc” order.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and the parties.
/s/ ROB ERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
CONSENT OF SAMIL ACCOUNTING CORPORATION
                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
NewState Capital Co., Ltd.

As  independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the inclusion of our
report dated July 30, 1999, on the consolidated financial statements of NewState
Capital Co., Ltd. and its  subsidiary  (the  "Company") as of March 31, 1999, in
the  Registration  Statement on Form 10-KSB.  We have not audited any  financial
statements  of the Company  subsequent  to March 31, 1999 or performed any audit
procedures subsequent to the dated of our report.


                                             /S/ SAMIL ACCOUNTING CORPORATION


Seoul, Korea
July 8, 2000


Samil  Accounting  Corporation  is the  Korean  member  firm  of  the  worldwide
PricewaterhouseCoopers organization.
Exhibit 32.2



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Kenneth W. Bean, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of Pediatric Prosthetics, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period
ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such  Form  10-QSB/A  fairly  presents  in  all  material respects the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Pediatric  Prosthetics,  Inc.


                                     By:/s/ Kenneth W. Bean
                                     --------------------------
                                     Kenneth Bean
                                     Principal Financial Officer
December 21, 2006

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Bronson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David M. Bronson                                
|David M. Bronson                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 26, 2010
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 3, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136591 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136591 

 COA: 276439 

Wayne CC: 04-000969

JEREMY FISHER,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. In addition to the 

issues presented in the application for leave to appeal concerning whether the emergency 

aid doctrine justified the warrantless entry into the defendant’s home, and whether 

evidence of an assault against the police may be suppressed irrespective of the validity of 

a warrantless entry into a house, the parties shall address the standard of review to be 

applied for appellate review of a trial court’s decision concerning an alleged Fourth 

Amendment violation for entering a house without a warrant, considering United States v 

Gambino-Zavala, 539 F3d 1221, 1225 (CA 10, 2008), quoting United States v Apperson, 

441 F3d 1162, 1184 (CA 10, 2006), and Ornelas v United States, 517 US 690; 116 S Ct 

1657; 134 L Ed 2d 911 (1996). 

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense 

Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court 

for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. 

p0930 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 3, 2008 

Clerk
Environmental Court of Vermont 

State of Vermont 

=========================================================================== 

 E N T R Y R E G A R D I N G M O T I O N 

=========================================================================== 

JLD Prop. Wal*Mart Act 250 LU Permit (Altered), Docket No. 116-6-08 Vtec 

Project: Wal-Mart St. Albans 

Applicant: JLD Properties 

(Appeal from a determination by the District #7 Environmental Commission) 

Title: Motion for Protective Order, No. 1 

Filed: September 15, 2008 

Filed By: John H. Hasen, Attorney for NRB Land Use Panel. 

Response filed on 09/25/08 by Appellant VNRC. 

_X_ Granted ___ Denied ___ Other 

___ Scheduled for hearing on: _________ at ________; Time Allotted ________ 

For all the reasons more specifically provided in the Entry Order 

concerning NRB’s motion to dismiss Appellant’s Question 1, this Entry 

Order is hereby issued to protect and prohibit all parties from making 

discovery requests that are not relevant to the remaining issues that 

have been preserved for our review by the pending Statements of 

Questions. This Order shall not prohibit discovery requests seeking 

information that may not be admissible under the Vermont Rules of 

Evidence, so long as such discovery requests “appear[] reasonably 

calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” V.R.C.P. 

26(a)(1). 

This protective order is specifically issued to prohibit the 

solicitation from the District #7 Commission Chair of responses to any 

discovery requests not germane to the Questions remaining in Appellants’ 

Statement of Questions, as such discovery has not been shown to be 

relevant to the issues preserved for our review in this appeal. Such 

discovery is therefore not to be had. V.R.C.P. 26(c)(1). 

___________________________________________ __October 10, 2008_____ 

 Thomas S. Durkin, Judge Date 

=========================================================================== 

Date copies sent to: ____________ Clerk's Initials _______ 

Copies sent to: 

 (See attached service list) 
 Attorney Jon Groveman for Appellant Vt. Natural Resources Council 

 Attorney Jon Groveman for Appellant NW Cit. for Responsible Growth 

 Attorney Jon Groveman for Appellant Marie Frey 

 Attorney Jon Groveman for Appellant Richard Hudak 

 Co-Counsel for Appellant Robert M. Hartwell 

 Attorney Stewart H. McConaughy for Appellee JLD Properties 

 Co-Counsel for Appellee Robert F. O'Neill 

 Attorney David A. Barra for Interested Person Town of St. Albans 

 Attorney Brian S. Dunkiel for Cross Appellant City of St. Albans 

 Attorney Jon T. Anderson for Cross Appellant Commons Associates 

 Attorney John H. Hasen for Natural Resources Board Land Use Panel 

 Attorney Judith L. Dillon for Cross Appellant Agency of Natural Resources 

 Attorney Trevor R. Lewis for the Vt. Agency of Transportation 

 Attorney Mark L. Lucas for Natural Resource Board Water Resources Panel, 

 (FYI purposes only)
Exhibit 14.2











Grant Thornton Argentina





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We have issued our report dated March 28, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Pointer Localizacion y Asistencia S.A.; such report has been  included in the Annual Report of Pointer Telocation Ltd. ("Pointer"), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011. In connection with the filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Pointer, for the year ended December 31, 2011,we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Pointer on Forms F-3 (No. 333-111019, effective October 13, 2004, No. 333-126257, effective July 15, 2005, No. 333-143399 effective October 17, 2007, and No. 333-167144 effective June 7, 2010) and on Forms S-8 (No. 333-173155, effective March 30, 2011, No. 333-118897, effective September 10, 2004, No. 333-113420, effective March 9, 2004, No. 333-141306, effective March 15, 2007 and No. 333-139717 effective December 29, 2006).





/s/ GRANT THORNTON ARGENTINA S.C.





Buenos Aires, Argentina


April 23, 2012
Eric Scott ROWE, Plaintiff, v. Sarah Charlene ROWE, Defendant, v. Marlena Rowe, Intervenor.

No. COA16-1072

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: May 2, 2017

REVERSED IN PART. VACATED IN PART. REMANDED.