alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the MATTER OF the ADOPTION OF: C.H.M., a Minor Child

No. 297PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Michael S. Harrell, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Morris, Michael, et al.

*4Travis Taylor, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Westgate, Venson.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of August 2016 by Petitioners in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
In the MATTER OF: J.M.C.

No. COA16-485

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 15, 2016

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
KORNEGAY FAMILY FARMS, LLC, et al. v. CROSS CREEK SEED, INC.

187PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 29, 2016

Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Steven B. Epstein, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Cross Creek Seed, Inc.

L. Neal Ellis, Jr., Attorney at Law, Wake Forest, J. P. Williamson, Jr., Attorney at Law, For Kornegay Family Farms, LLC, et al.

Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 28th of September 2016 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of September 2016."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 23rd day of November 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nos. 04-07-00529-CR & 04-07-00530-CR

Christopher Lee PONCE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 04-CR-623 & 06-CR-461

Honorable J. Manuel Bañales, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Justice

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 10, 2008

AFFIRMED

Christopher Ponce pled true to violating the conditions of his community supervision, and

the trial court sentenced Ponce to 20 years confinement for the offense of robbery and life

imprisonment for the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. We affirm.

Ponce’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed briefs in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he concludes that the appeals have no merit. Counsel
04-07-00529-CR & 04-07-00530-CR

-2-

provided Ponce with copies of the briefs and informed him of his right to review the records and file

his own briefs. Ponce has not filed a pro se brief in any of his appeals.

We have reviewed the records and counsel’s briefs, and we agree that the appeals are

frivolous and without merit. The judgments of the trial court are therefore affirmed. Furthermore,

we grant counsel’s motions to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996,

no pet.).

Catherine Stone, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group, Development Biology Subcommittee.
    Date: October 10-11, 2005.
    Time: October 10, 2005, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Latham Hotel, 3000 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007.
    Time:October 11, 2005, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Latham Hotel, 3000 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9dad1d8d7ded7f9d4d8d0d597d7d0d197ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1b2b9b0bfb6bf91bcb0b8bdffbfb8b9ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18862 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# 04-75258 Shalaby v. Gonzales

Alarcon, Berzon, Tallman

209.8543
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Richard O'SHIELDS

No. COA16-822

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 21, 2017

NO ERROR.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Petro Financial Corporation (the Company), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This written
statement is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | /s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.               
|                     |  | (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                 
|                     |  | President and Director               
|                     | 
|Date: March 30, 2006 |  | /s/ Edward Escudero                  
|                     |  | (Edward Escudero)                    
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3844 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3844

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require cost or price to the 
 Federal Government be given at least equal importance as technical or 
    other criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for defense 
                               contracts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to require cost or price to the 
 Federal Government be given at least equal importance as technical or 
    other criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for defense 
                               contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT THAT COST OR PRICE TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BE 
              GIVEN AT LEAST EQUAL IMPORTANCE AS TECHNICAL OR OTHER 
              CRITERIA IN EVALUATING COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS FOR DEFENSE 
              CONTRACTS.

    (a) Requirement.--Subparagraph (A) of section 2305(a)(3) of title 
10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``proposals; and'' at 
the end of clause (ii) and all that follows through the end of the 
subparagraph and inserting the following: ``proposals and that must be 
assigned importance at least equal to all evaluation factors other than 
cost or price when combined.''.
    (b) Waiver.--Section 2305(a)(3) of such title is further amended by 
striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
                    ``(B) The requirement of subparagraph (A)(ii) 
                relating to assigning at least equal importance to 
                evaluation factors of cost or price may be waived by 
                the head of the agency.''.
    (c) Report.--Section 2305(a)(3) of such title is further amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Not later than 180 days after the end of each 
                fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 
                Congress, and post on a publicly available website of 
                the Department of Defense, a report containing a list 
                of each waiver issued by the head of an agency under 
                subparagraph (B) during the preceding fiscal year.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of PureDepth,
      Inc.
      do hereby certify that:





(a)
      the
      quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PureDepth, Inc. for the period ended July
      31,
      2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of PureDepth,
      Inc.











Dated:
      September 14, 2007








/s/
      Thomas L. Marcus





Thomas
      L.
      Marcus


Chief
      Executive Officer










/s/
      Jonathan J. McCaman





Jonathan
      J. McCaman


Chief
      Financial Officer and


Chief
      Accounting Officer
W i l l pa r t i ci pat e as a me mberof th e en ba n c cou r tpu r s u an tt o 3d Ci r . I . O . P. 9. 6. 4. 1 W i l l pa r t i ci pat e as a me mberof th e en ba n c cou r tpu r s u an tt o 3d Ci r . I . O . P. 9. 6. 4. 2 UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 09- 2238 S IN G E R M A N A G E M E N T C O N S U L T A N T S , IN C .; L IV E G O L D O P E R A T IO N S , IN C ., A p p e lla n ts . v. A N N E M IL G R A M , A t t orneyG ener al of the St at e of N ew J er s ey P RE S E NT : M c KE E , Ch i e f J u d g e , S L OVI T E R, S CI RI CA , RE NDE L L , BA RR Y, AM BR O, F UE NT E S , S M I T H, F I S HE R, CH AGAR E S , J OR DAN, HAR DI M AN, GR EENA W AY , J r . , VA NA SKI E a n d ALD I SERT RO TH , C i r cui tJ udges 1 2 OR DER A m aj or i tyof the ac t i ve j udges havi ng vot ed forr ehea r i ng en banc i n the above capt i oned ca s e, i ti s or der ed thatthe pet i t i on forr ehea r i ng i s G R A N T E D . T he C l erk of thi s C our ts hal l l i s tthe ca s e forr ehea r i ng en banc atthe conve ni ence of the C our t . T he opi ni on and j udgm entent er ed A ugus t5, 2010, ar e her ebyvaca t ed. B yth e C o u rt, / s /T heodor e A . M cK ee C hi ef Ci r cui tJ udge D at e: Sept ember1, 2010 tyw / cc: W i l l i am L . C harr on, E s q.

J eff r eyA . K ozi er , E s q.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

 Submitted August 25, 2008*

Decided October 3, 2008

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 07-2234

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOHN A. RADERMACHER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United 

States District Court for the 

Western District of 

Wisconsin.

No. 05-CR-39-C-01

Barbara B. Crabb, Chief Judge.

Order

After a limited remand under United States v. Taylor, 522 F.3d 731 (7th Cir. 2008), 

the district judge informed us that she would have imposed a lower sentence had she 

known about the extent of her discretion under Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558 

(2007).

Given this conclusion, the prejudice component of plain-error review has been 

established. The sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing in light 

of Kimbrough.

 *After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with 

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136832 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136832 

 COA: 274869 

TRACEY ANN PIERCE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

Jackson CC: 05-001355-FH; 

06-003014-FH 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 13, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51023

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMIRO ROBLES-CHAVEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-76-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ramiro RoblesChavez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6468

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS WILLIAMS, a/k/a Q, aka Paul Ralph Scott, a/k/a Warren

Brown, a/k/a Professor,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (3:02-cr-00387-JRS-1; 3:06-cv-00074-JRS)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 19, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Elizabeth Chase, Assistant

United States Attorney, Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2009141EN.01003902.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/39

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 May 2009 — Rotter v OHIM (Shape of an arrangement of sausages)

(Case T-449/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark - Shape of an arrangement of sausages - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

2009/C 141/80

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Thomas Rotter (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Müller, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 September 2007 (Case R 1415/2006-4) relating to the registration of a three-dimensional sign representing an arrangement of sausages as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Thomas Rotter to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Thomas Rotter to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 9.2.2008.

1

---
WILSON v. WILSON

328P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 6, 2016

Linwood E. Wilson, for Wilson, Linwood.

Autumn D. Osbourne, Attorney at Law, Gray Ellis, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Wilson, Barbara.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of September 2016 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of September 2016."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3809 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3809

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain population 
  census tracts for which information is not available as low-income 
        communities for purposes of the new markets tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 26, 2013

  Mr. Costa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain population 
  census tracts for which information is not available as low-income 
        communities for purposes of the new markets tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN POPULATION CENSUS TRACTS FOR WHICH INFORMATION IS 
              NOT AVAILABLE MADE ELIGIBLE FOR NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 45D of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(6) Special rule for tracts for which information is not 
        available.--In the case of a population census tract with 
        respect to which the Secretary determines there is insufficient 
        information to determine whether such tract is a low-income 
        community (determined without regard to this paragraph), such 
        tract shall be treated as a low-income community if--
                    ``(A) such tract is adjacent to two or more low-
                income communities (determined without regard to this 
                paragraph), and
                    ``(B) the Secretary does not have information 
                indicating that such tract is not a low-income 
                community (as so determined).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to investments made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-131859, 333-128184, 333-121955, 333-114315, 333-111595, 333-105127, 333-102829, 333-64176,
  333-67213, 333-25987, 333-131859, 333-147591 and 333-143868) and S-8 (Nos. 333-97719, 333-86817, 333-67223, 333-28403, 333-26557, 333-20939, 333-17209 and 333-136271) of Enliven Marketing
  Technologies Corporation (formerly Viewpoint Corporation) of our report dated March 17, 2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control
  over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New YorkMarch 17, 2008



---