alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 247/6 Oc

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 247 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 476 October 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 247

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 476 October 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 247/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 247/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3583 — Flextronic/Nortel) (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 247/3 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 3 |
| 2004/C 247/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3476 — Cargill/Seara) (1) | 8 |
| 2004/C 247/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3573 — LUKOIL/CONOCO-PHILLIPS/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 9 |
| 2004/C 247/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3581 — T-Mobile/PTC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 247/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 247/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3583 — Flextronic/Nortel) (1)

2

2004/C 247/3

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

3

2004/C 247/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3476 — Cargill/Seara) (1)

8

2004/C 247/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3573 — LUKOIL/CONOCO-PHILLIPS/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

9

2004/C 247/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3581 — T-Mobile/PTC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 14.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form F-3 (No. 333-111019, 333-119998, 333-126257, 333-143399) and related Prospectus and on Form S-8 (No. 333-118897, 333-113420, 333-141306, 333-139717) pertaining to the Employees' Stock Option Plan of Pointer Telocation Ltd. of our report dated March 24, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Pointer Telocation Ltd. , included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Kost, Forer, Gabbay & KasiererA Member of Ernst & Young Global
  Tel-Aviv, Israel
 March 24, 2010
STATE of North Carolina v. Tishekka Nicole CAIN.

No. COA15-1208.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 56470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special 
Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
of a decision to designate a class of employees at the Y-12 facility, 
in Oak Ridge, Tennessee as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort 
(SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 
Program Act of 2000. On August 25, 2005, the Secretary of HHS 
designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:
    Department of Energy (DOE) employees or DOE contractor or 
subcontractor employees who worked in uranium enrichment operations or 
other radiological activities at the Y-12 facility in Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee from March 1943 through December 1947 and who were employed 
for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, either 
solely under this employment or in combination with work days of 
employment occurring within the parameters (excluding aggregate work 
day requirements) established for other classes of employees included 
in the SEC.
    This designation will become effective on September 24, 2005, 
unless Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After 
this effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the Federal Register 
reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any 
provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to 
the SEC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 
45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91ded2d0c2d1d2d5d2bfd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="652a262436252621264b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 20, 2005.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 05-19224 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 2, 2021

t0222 

# Order

Clerk March 2, 2021

161634

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161634

COA: 353572

Muskegon CC: 18

- 006437

- FH

WALI ABDULLAH AHMAD, 18

- 006439

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 28, 2020 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED , because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1 ... S ee Te x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SEC OND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 06 3- CV I N R E NY AGU DI O. OK UMU R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NALP R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- The c our t ha s con si der ed r el at or ' s app l i ca t i on f orw r i t of ha bea s cor pus and f orem er gen cy r el i efan d i s of t h e o p i n i on t hatr el i efs houl d be de ni ed. A ccor di ngl y, r el at or ' s appl i cat i on f orw r i t of habeas cor pus and f orem er gency r el i efi s den i ed. R el at orshal l pay al l cost s of t hi s or i gi nal pro c e e di ng, f orw hi ch l et execut i on i ssue. P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: M EI ER, J. ; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d M C C O Y, J. DEL I VERE D: M a r c h 3, 2009
STATE of North Carolina v. Anton CHRISTEN

No. 38P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Anton Christen, for Christen, Anton.

*294Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd of January 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wake County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of January 2017 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of January 2017 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50434

Summary Calendar

ROBERT R. WEST,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(A-96-CV-362)

October 30, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert R. West appeals an adverse summary judgment in his Title VII sex

discrimination lawsuit against Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Having

reviewed the briefs and pertinent parts of the record and finding neither error of law
2

nor fact, on the basis of the facts as noted and analysis contained in the Order of the

district court rendered April 24, 1997 and entered April 25, 1997, the judgment

appealed is AFFIRMED.
# C_2010024EN.01004602.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2009 — Apache Footwear and Apache II Footwear v Council

(Case T-1/07) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam - Market economy status - Community interest)

2010/C 24/80

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Apache Footwear Ltd (Pingsha, China); and Apache II Footwear Ltd (Qingxin) (Taiping Zhen, China) (represented initially by: O. Prost and S. Ballschmiede, and subsequently by O. Prost and E. Berthelot, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch, lawyer)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and T. Scharf, acting as Agents; Confédération européenne de l’industrie de la chaussure (CEC), (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by P. Vlaemminck, G. Zonnekeyn and S. Verhulst, and subsequently by P. Vlaemminck and A. Hubert, lawyers); BA.LA. di Lanciotti Vittorio & C. Sas (Monte Urano, Italy) and the 16 other interveners the names of which are listed in the Annex to the judgment, represented by P. Tabellini, G. Celona and C. Cavaliere, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 of 5 October 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam (OJ 2006 L 275, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Apache Footwear Ltd and Apache II Footwear Ltd (Qingxin) to bear their own costs as well as those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Apache Footwear Ltd and Apache II Footwear Ltd (Qingxin) to bear their own costs as well as those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission, the Confédération européenne de l’industrie de la chaussure (CEC), BA.LA. di Lanciotti Vittorio & C. Sas and the 16 other interveners the names of which are listed in the Annex to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission, the Confédération européenne de l’industrie de la chaussure (CEC), BA.LA. di Lanciotti Vittorio & C. Sas and the 16 other interveners the names of which are listed in the Annex to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.

1

---
Dawn Weideman v. Erin Atalie Shelton v. Annette Wise, Intervenor

No. 254P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Paul Louis Bidwell, Attorney at Law, Douglas A. Ruley, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Wise, Annette.

Jessica A. Walters, Attorney at Law.

Patrick S. McCroskey, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Weideman, Dawn.

Janee J. Garcia, Attorney at Law, for Shelton, Erin Atalie.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of July 2016 by Intervenor in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
Mark PAGE, Plaintiff, v. Patricia MCCABE (formerly Page), Defendant.

No. COA16-1143

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: June 20, 2017

VACATED AND REMANDED.
127018(89(91) 

DIANE CAMERON and JAMES 

CAMERON, Co-Guardians of the

Estate of Daniel Cameron, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 SC: 127018 

v CoA: 248315 

AUTO CLUB INSURANCE 

 Wayne CC: 02-000549-NF 

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_______________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, motions by the Michigan Department of 

Community Health and the Michigan Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file briefs 

amicus curiae are considered and they are GRANTED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6806

DELBERT THOMAS COPELAND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BETH ARTHUR, Sheriff; KEVIN POPE, Deputy; FOSTER LINCOLN,

Deputy,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (2:07-cv-00473-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted: August 28, 2008 Decided: October 14, 2008

Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Delbert Thomas Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

We note that because the district court’s dismissal was

without prejudice, Copeland may refile his complaint and pay the

requisite filing fee. We express no opinion on the timeliness or

the merits of the original complaint or any complaint Copeland may

choose to file in the future.

2

PER CURIAM:

Delbert Thomas Copeland appeals the district court’s

order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint for failure to comply with a court order. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Copeland v.

Arthur, No. 2:07-cv-00473-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2008).* We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4032 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To exempt from Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 certain 

water transfers by the North Texas Municipal Water 

District and the Greater Texoma Utility Authority, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4032 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Texas Invasive 

3 Species Barrier Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH LACEY ACT AMENDMENTS OF 

5 1981. 

6 Section 5 of Public Law 112–237 (126 Stat. 1629) 

7 is amended by inserting after ‘‘zebra mussels’’ the fol8 lowing: ‘‘and other fish, wildlife, and plants present in 

9 Lake Texoma that are prohibited under section 3 of such 

10 Act (16 U.S.C. 3372) or under section 42 of title 18, 

11 United States Code’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 28, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

Calendar No. 475 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4028 

[Report No. 113–214] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 2, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JULY 21, 2014 

Reported by Mr. MENENDEZ, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To amend the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 

to include the desecration of cemeteries among the many 

forms of violations of the right to religious freedom. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) Cemeteries are sacred sites that are of great 

6 spiritual, cultural, and historical significance to 

7 many religious and ethnic groups. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4028 RS

1 (2) Congress is committed to protecting and 

2 preserving the heritage and sacred sites of national, 

3 religious, and ethnic groups, which includes ceme4 teries in the United States and abroad. 

5 (3) Cemeteries around the world have and con6 tinue to be defaced or destroyed as a direct result 

7 of their affiliation with a particular religious or spir8 itual group. 

9 (4) Such attacks constitute an assault on the 

10 fundamental right to freedom of religion, and are es11 pecially egregious when sponsored or tolerated by 

12 the local or national governments in the countries in 

13 which such offenses occur. 

14 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREE15 DOM ACT OF 1998. 

16 Section 2(a)(4) of the International Religious Free17 dom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6401(a)(4)) is amended in 

18 the fourth sentence by inserting ‘‘desecration of ceme19 teries,’’ after ‘‘confiscations of property,’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 475 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4028 

[Report No. 113–214] 

AN ACT 

To amend the International Religious Freedom Act 

to religious freedom. among the many forms of violations of the right of 1998 to include the desecration of cemeteries 

JULY 21, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# CE2004078EN.01051802.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/518 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/518

---

(2004/C 78 E/0539)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3309/03

by Philip Claeys (NI) to the Commission

(10 November 2003)

Subject:   ‘Responsible shopping week’ in the Commission's buildings

Subject:

Between 6 and 10 October, a ‘responsible shopping week’ was held in the Commission's buildings. A brochure published in connection with it mentions cooperation in the project by the Fair Trade Centre and the Commission's main catering suppliers, Delhaize, Eurest and Sodexho.

As well as making space available in its buildings, did the Commission also provide financial assistance for this event? If so, how much?

Were any quantitative objectives set for ‘responsible shopping week’? If so, what? Were the objectives attained?

Did the organisers give consumers the opportunity to assess the quality of the products on offer? If so, what was the outcome?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(19 December 2003)

(19 December 2003)

A one-week event on the theme of responsible consumption took place at the Commission from 6 to 10 October 2003. The week was organised to coincide with the ‘Fair Trade’ week in Belgium and in collaboration with the Fair Trade Centre — which co-ordinates the activities of the Belgian Fair Trade Organisations. The organisation of this event is the result of a commitment made by the Commission in its Communication on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (1) to launch a campaign in 2003 to raise staff awareness of the principles of CSR.

1

During the event, fair trade products were offered for sale in the restaurants and cafeterias, vending machines and the Euro City shop of the Commission in Brussels. Products offered were coffee, tea, fruit juices, sugar, cereal and chocolate bars, rice, quince and bananas.

The Parliament was associated with the promotion and fair trade products were offered for sale in its restaurants and bars, as the Honourable Member will know.

The Employment and Social Affairs DG of the Commission provided a budget of EUR 30 000 that was used for producing promotional material (brochures, posters, etc.) and for organising food-tasting stands offering fair trade products.

The object of the week was to reinforce staff awareness of the issues relating to CSR and responsible consumption by offering them information on this subject as well as the chance to buy fair trade products at their workplace.

Initial reactions from Commission staff to the products offered have been positive, especially regarding coffee, tea, cereal and chocolate bars and fruit juices. Sales of these products have been substantial. The overall results of the event will be evaluated at the end of 2003.

The companies holding the concession contracts for the Commission's restaurants and cafeterias, vending machines and the Euro City shop have committed themselves to continue to offer these fair trade products for as long as there is sufficient demand.

---

(1)  COM(2002) 347 final.

1

---