alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (DMR) #1203.                    

*Dates & Times:*                         October 6, 2005; 7:45 a.m.-6:30 p.m. (open 7:45-12:45, 1:45-5). October 7, 2005; 8 a.m.-3:30 p.m. (closed).                    

*Place:*                         California State University at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Part open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Thomas P. Rieker, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4914.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning progress of the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials.                    

*Agenda:*                         October 6, 2005—Open for Directors overview of the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials. October 6 & 7, 2005—Closed to review and evaluate progress of the Partnership for Research and Education in Materials.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The work being reviewed may include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: September 20, 2005.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-19082 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 7555-07-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 4th day of January, 2005.



| | /s/ Robert M. Baker                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert M. Baker                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
In the Matter of: H.B. and I.B.

No. COA16-482

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal C 316A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.316.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 316A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5519 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.316.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 316A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5519 October 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2012/C 316A/01 | Cancellation notice | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2012/C 316A/01

Cancellation notice

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |
| 101 | |
| 110 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 114 | |
| 121 | (BG) |
| 122 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | (PT) |
| 140 | |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (CS/DA) |
| 160 | |
| 161 | |
| 169 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 187 | |
| 189 | |
| 197 | (DA/DE/EN/SK) |
| 198 | (EN/FR) |
| 199 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 204 | (ET/GA/LV/PT) |
| 206 | (CS) |
| 210 | (LT) |
| 211 | (MT) |
| 212 | (PL) |
| 214 | (SK) |
| 215 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 228 | (SL) |
| 266 | |
| 270 | |
| 274 | (CS) |
| 275 | (LV) |
| 276 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 278 | |
| 281 | (MT) |
| 283 | (SV) |
| 285 | (ES) |
| 288 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 290 | |
| 291 | |
| 292 | (HU) |
| 294 | (BG) |
| 296 | (BG) |
| 300 | |
| 302 | |
| 304 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 305 | |
| 307 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 314 | |
| 316 | |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

101

110

(DE/EN/FR)

114

121

(BG)

122

134

136

(PT)

140

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(CS/DA)

160

161

169

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(DE/EN/FR)

187

189

197

(DA/DE/EN/SK)

198

(EN/FR)

199

(DE/EN/FR)

204

(ET/GA/LV/PT)

206

(CS)

210

(LT)

211

(MT)

212

(PL)

214

(SK)

215

(DE/EN/FR)

228

(SL)

266

270

274

(CS)

275

(LV)

276

(DE/EN/FR)

278

281

(MT)

283

(SV)

285

(ES)

288

(DE/EN/FR)

290

291

292

(HU)

294

(BG)

296

(BG)

300

302

304

(DE/EN/FR)

305

307

(DE/EN/FR)

314

316

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2008313EN.01003201.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/32

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 October 2008 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-278/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Social security - Industrial accident - Decision to close the procedure for the application of Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Lack of an act causing adverse effect - Appeal unfounded)

(2008/C 313/57)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 May 2007Marcuccio v Commission (Case F-2/06, not yet published in the ECR), for the annulment of that order.

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | orders Mr Luigi Marcuccio to bear his own costs and to pay the Commission's costs before this Court. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Mr Luigi Marcuccio to bear his own costs and to pay the Commission's costs before this Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4104 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4104

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 7.5 
 percent threshold for the medical expense deduction for people 65 or 
                                 older.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2014

 Mrs. Negrete McLeod introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 7.5 
 percent threshold for the medical expense deduction for people 65 or 
                                 older.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Savings on Medical Expenses for 
Seniors Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. 7.5 PERCENT THRESHOLD FOR MEDICAL EXPENSE DEDUCTION FOR PEOPLE 
              65 OR OLDER MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``(7.5 percent of adjusted gross income in the case that 
such taxpayer or such taxpayer's spouse has attained age 65 before the 
close of such taxable year)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
        amended by striking subsection (f).
            (2) Section 56(b)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 is amended by striking ``subsection (f) of such section'' 
        and inserting ``the parenthetical relating to 7.5 percent''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008022EN.01003402.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/34

---

Appeal brought on 22 November 2007 by the Commission of the European Communities against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 12 September 2007 in Case T-196/02 MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-520/07 P)

(2008/C 22/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Gross, B. Martenczuk)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested judgment of the Court of First Instance delivered on 12 September 2007 in Case T-196/02 MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH v Commission of the European Communities, |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested judgment of the Court of First Instance delivered on 12 September 2007 in Case T-196/02 MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH v Commission of the European Communities,

MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH

Commission of the European Communities

| — | give a final decision in the case and dismiss the application as unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

—

give a final decision in the case and dismiss the application as unfounded;

| — | order the applicant in the main proceedings to pay the costs of these appeal proceedings as well as the costs of the proceedings at first instance in Case T-196/02. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the applicant in the main proceedings to pay the costs of these appeal proceedings as well as the costs of the proceedings at first instance in Case T-196/02.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Court of First Instance erred in assuming that it was not possible to make a decision on the basis of the available information for the purpose of establishing the actual beneficiary of the aid. Establishing the actual beneficiary is normally an integral part of Commission decisions ordering recovery of unlawful aid. Making this determination is indeed necessary to ensure efficient recovery of unlawful aid. Excluding the possibility of establishing the actual beneficiary of aid on the basis of the available information is thus not compatible with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.

Secondly, the Court was wrong to assume that the Commission decision was based on a mere presumption which did not meet the requirements of a decision on the basis of the available information. On the one hand, where a decision is made on the basis of the information available no absolute certainty is required. On the other, the Commission decision was based on the information sent by SKL-M's insolvency administrator as to the development costs of the know-how. The Commission thus had sufficient evidence to allow it to conclude that the transfer of the know-how to MTU represented an advantage for that undertaking.

---
United States Department of Labor 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

__________________________________________ 

C.S., Appellant 

and 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN 

SERVICES, NATIONAL DISASTER MEDICAL 

SERVICES, Bethesda, MD, Employer 

__________________________________________ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 14-1994 

Issued: June 26, 2015 

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record

Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant 

Office of Solicitor, for the Director 

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

Before: 

CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Chief Judge 

ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Alternate Judge 

JAMES A. HAYNES, Alternate Judge 

On January 21, 2015 the Board issued a decision and order in the above-entitled case. By 

that decision, the Board affirmed the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs’ (OWCP) 

August 21, 2014 decision, finding that it properly declined to reopen appellant’s claim for review 

of the merits. 

Counsel filed a petition for reconsideration on February 16, 2015 and requested that the 

Board correct a typographical error in the first paragraph of the decision. He noted that the 

Board had listed the date of the last merit Board decision as April 24, 2013 rather than 

April 24, 2014. 

 The Clerk of the Board served the Director of OWCP with a copy of appellant’s petition 

for reconsideration on March 20, 2015. On March 20, 2015 the Director filed an answer stating 

that he had no comment and requesting that the Board rule justly on the petition. 

 The Clerk of the Board served counsel with a copy of the Director’s answer to his 

petition for reconsideration on March 20, 2015. Counsel did not respond within the time 

allotted. 
2

 The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the standard for granting a 

petition for reconsideration is that the Board’s decision contains an error of fact or law 

warranting further consideration.1 In the petition for reconsideration, counsel has submitted 

evidence of an error of fact in the January 21, 2015 decision in that the Board misstated the date 

of its last merit decision as April 24, 2013 in the jurisdictional paragraph. The Board found and 

referred to April 24, 2014, as the date of the last merit decision in the remainder of the decision. 

 Consequently, appellant’s petition for reconsideration should be granted and the decision 

and order docketed as No. 14-1994 should be reissued with a corrected date of April 24, 2014 as 

the date of the last merit Board decision in the jurisdictional paragraph. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s petition for reconsideration is granted. 

Issued: June 26, 2015 

Washington, DC 

 

 Christopher J. Godfrey, Chief Judge 

 Employees' Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Alec J. Koromilas, Alternate Judge 

 Employees' Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 James A. Haynes, Alternate Judge 

 Employees' Compensation Appeals Board 

 1 Virginia Faye Gabbert (Byron Lowell Gabbert), 21 ECAB 149 (1969).
Exhibit 99.2



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-QSB
for  the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Mark  E.  Larson, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc.,  the  Managing General Partner  of  the  Partnership,
certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                              /s/ Mark E Larson
                                  Mark E. Larson
                                  Chief Financial Officer of
                                  AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.,
                                  the Managing General Partner
                                  August 6, 2002
IB 

Union Calendar No. 431 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4067 

[Report No. 113–582, Part I] 

To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on supervision 

requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in critical access and 

small rural hospitals through 2014. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2014 

Ms. JENKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

Additional sponsors: Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. DAINES, Mr. LOEBSACK, Mrs. 

NOEM, and Mr. SCHOCK

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

The Committee on Ways and Means discharged; committed to the Committee 

of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4067 RH

A BILL 

To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction 

on supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic 

services in critical access and small rural hospitals 

through 2014. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4067 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION 

4 ON SUPERVISION REQUIREMENTS FOR OUT5 PATIENT THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN CRIT6 ICAL ACCESS AND SMALL RURAL HOSPITALS 

7 THROUGH 2014. 

8 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

9 continue to apply through calendar year 2014 the enforce10 ment instruction described in the notice of the Centers for 

11 Medicare & Medicaid Services entitled ‘‘Enforcement In12 struction on Supervision Requirements for Outpatient 

13 Therapeutic Services in Critical Access and Small Rural 

14 Hospitals for CY 2013’’, dated November 1, 2012 (pro15 viding for an exception to the restatement and clarification 

16 under the final rulemaking changes to the Medicare hos17 pital outpatient prospective payment system and calendar 

18 year 2009 payment rates (published in the Federal Reg19 ister on November 18, 2008, 73 Fed. Reg. 68702 through 

20 68704) with respect to requirements for direct supervision 

21 by physicians for therapeutic hospital outpatient services). 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 431 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4067 

[Report No. 113–582, Part I] 

A BILL 

To provide for the extension of the enforcement insmall rural hospitals through 2014. patient therapeutic services in critical access and struction on supervision requirements for outSEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 

The Committee on Ways and Means discharged; comState of the Union and ordered to be printed mitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE v. Victor Jay CRISCO, Jr.

No. 377P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Gilda C. Rodriguez, Durham, for Crisco, Victor Jay Jr.

Sandra Wallace-Smith, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Victor J. Crisco, for Crisco, Victor Jay Jr.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*605The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of December 2015 by Defendant to Withdraw Defendant's Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 (the “Report”) of Hercules Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Seth H. Meyer, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| Date: August 1, 2019 | By:    | /S/ SETH H. MEYER

                                |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Seth H. Meyer                                           |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer, and 

Chief Accounting Officer |
State of North Carolina v. Joseph M. Romano

No. 199PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Ramano, Joseph M.

Derrick Mertz, Special Deputy Attorney General, Todd Williams, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 6th of June 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).