alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-86457, 333-93516, 333-32713 and 333-60651) and
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-19197, 333-60079 and 333-60619) of Winston Hotels, Inc. of
our report dated January 24, 2003 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
February 26, 2003
Amendment No. 2 to the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO

 BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

2011 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

Pursuant to Section 14 of the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. (the
“Company”), the Board of Directors of the Company has duly adopted a resolution, conditioned upon approval by the stockholders of the Company, approving this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan to increase the total number of shares of
common stock, par value $.001 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”) reserved and available for issuance under the Plan as follows: 

1. Section 5(b) of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

“(b) Subject to Sections 3, 11 and 12 of this Plan, the Committee is authorized to deliver under this Plan an aggregate of Eight Million
Eight Hundred Thousand (8,800,000) Common Shares. Each Common Share subject to an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right will reduce the number of Common Shares available for issuance by one share, and each Common Share underlying an Award of
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Stock Bonus Awards and Performance Compensation Awards will reduce the number of Common Shares available for issuance by 1.15 shares.” 

2. All other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect as written. 

3. A majority in voting interest of the stockholders present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting of stockholders at
which this Amendment No. 2 was considered, has duly approved this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment No. 2 to the Plan is made effective this     day of             , 2014. 

 

			
	BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:
<PAGE>   1
                             VIEWPOINT CORPORATION
           NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No.'s 333-3070, 333-17209, 333-20939, 333-26557,
333-28403, 333-67223 and 333-86817) of our report dated March 12, 2001, related
to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement
schedule of Viewpoint Corporation, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2001

                                        72
State of North Carolina v. Jermuis Erell Andrews

No. 402P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Mr. Jermuis Erell Andrews, Pro Se.

Mr. William D. Spence, Attorney at Law, For Andrews, Jermuis Erell.

Mr. Jason R. Rosser, Attorney at Law, Mr. Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 24th of October 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of October 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals *522pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Ketchikan, Alaska, October 13, 2005 and December 15, 2005. The purpose of these meetings is to discuss potential projects under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000.

# DATES:

The meetings will be held October 12, 2005 and December 15, 2005 at 6 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meetings will be held at the Southeast Alaska Discovery Center Learning Center (back entrance), 50 Main Street, Ketchikan, Alaska. Send written comments to Ketchikan Resource Advisory Committee, c/o District Ranger, USDA Forest Service, 3031 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan, AK 99901, or electronically to                         *ikolund@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lynn Kolund, District Ranger, Ketchikan-Misty Fiords Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, (907) 228-4100.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meetings are open to the public Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: September 6, 2005.

Forrest Cole,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 05-18207  Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
# Official Journal C 102/16 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 102 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6116 March 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 102

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6116 March 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 102/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2018/C 102/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 102/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2018/C 102/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
In the Matter of A.S., appealed by Respondent, Mother.

No. 310A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Annick Lenoir-Peek, for Mother.

Pamela N. Williams, Associate Counsel, for Guardian ad Litem.

J. Hal Kinlaw, Jr., for Robeson County DSS.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 661 S.E.2d 313.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Respondent (Mother) on the 3rd day of July 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Respondent's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 12, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 12, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0490. THOMAS C. LESTER v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 02CR0048
Kyle EDWARDS, individually and d/b/a/ Kyle Edwards Construction Company, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF HAYWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE, a College, by and through its Board of Trustees, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. Cincinnati Insurance Company and North Carolina State Board of Education, Third Party Defendants.

No. COA15-1227.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
1

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1699

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Shahid R. Pratt, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 18, 2008

Filed: September 24, 2008

___________

Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Shahid Pratt appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed after revoking his

supervised release. We affirm. 

We find that the revocation sentence of 14 months in prison is not unreasonable.

First, the sentence was within both the statutory limits and the Chapter 7 advisory

Guidelines range of 8-14 months. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (authorizing up to 2-

year prison term upon revocation of supervised release where original offense was
-2-

Class C felony); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4(a) (range for Grade C violation with Category VI

criminal history is 8-14 months in prison). Second, in sentencing Pratt, the district

court considered appropriate factors, including Pratt’s history and characteristics, the

circumstances of his offense, and the need for deterrence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1)-

(2), (a)(4)(B), § 3583(e) (permitting imposition of revocation sentence after

consideration of certain § 3553(a) factors); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921,

923 (8th Cir. 2006) (district court need not mechanically list every § 3553(a)

consideration when sentencing defendant upon revocation of supervised release).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. 

______________________________
Mike Campbell, Rhonda Campbell, Gail Campbell, John Fox, Jr., Sylvia Fox, Alan Harpe, Robin Harpe, Bill Sherrill, Norma Jean Sherrill, Richard Gordon, Susanne Gordon, Joe Brown, Patty Hewitt, Larry Marlin, First Rx Pharmacy, Beth Bush, Charles Mcniel, Carol McNiel, Nga Amador, Jack Moore, Maria Moore, Jody Parlier, Cathy Parlier, David Lynch, Judith Lynch, Victor McIntyre, Louise McIntyre, Brian Fox, Carrie Norman, Charles Johnson, Mary Johnson, Landrea Rhyne, Tom Brandon, Sara Brandon, Michael Kepley, Sandy Kepley, Vince Cherry, James Foxworthy, Sheila Foxworthy, Chuck Dockery, Kim Dockery, Bill Murdock, Jeannie Murdock, Shirley Silva, Brent Warren, Michelle Warren, Jim Howard, Janet Howard, HCRI North Carolina Properties III, LP dba Brookdale Senior Living Center, Louis Gordon, Travis Blackwelder, Statesville Bovine and Equine Center, Jared Reimann, Aimee Reimann, Lee Shepard, Cecil Davis, Imogene Davis, John Strikeleather III, Judy Voelske, Voelske Automotive, Cooney Properties, LLC, and Dr. Chip Cooney v. The City of Statesville, North Carolina, Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc., and Roserock Holdings, LLC

No. 412P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

*218Anthony Fox, Attorney at Law, Benjamin R. Sullivan, Jr., Attorney at Law, Nicolas E. Tosco, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Campbell, Mike, et al.

Edmund L. Gaines, Attorney at Law, Statesville, Leah G. Messick, Attorney at Law, for The City of Statesville.

Clifton W. Homesley, Attorney at Law, Clark D. Tew, Attorney at Law, Mooresville, for Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc., et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of November 2016 by Petitioners in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
VI 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 482 

For the relief of Charles Nyaga. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2007 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Charles Nyaga. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law or any order, for the purposes of the Immigra6 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Charles 

7 Nyaga shall be deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, 

8 and remained in, the United States, and shall be eligible 

9 for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 

10 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation11 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255). 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 482 IS

1 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub2 section (a) shall apply only if the application for issuance 

3 of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of 

4 status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 2 years 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

6 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

7 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa to Charles Nyaga, 

8 the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to 

9 reduce by 1, during the current or subsequent fiscal year, 

10 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail11 able to natives of the country of Charles Nyaga’s birth 

12 under section 202(e) or 203(a) of the Immigration and 

13 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e), 1153(a)), as applica14 ble. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

_______________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

135893(74) Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

MARKELL VANSLEMBROUCK, a Minor, 

by his Next Friend KIMBERLY A. 

VANSLEMBROUCK, and KIMBERLY

A. VANSLEMBROUCK, Individually,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

 SC: 135893 

v COA: 273551 

Oakland CC: 2006-074585-NH 

ANDREW JAY HALPERIN, M.D., 

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE OF GYNECOLOGY 

& OBSTETRICS, P.C., and WILLIAM 

BEAUMONT HOSPITAL,

Defendants-Appellants. 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendants-appellants for 

extension to September 17, 2008 of the time for filing their brief and appendix is 

considered and it is GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 25, 2008 

 Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50076

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS MANUEL GARCIA-GARCIA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-2566-ALL

Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgmentin a Criminal Case, Jesus Manuel Garcia-Garcia

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 8, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

EXECUTION VERSION 

FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE 

FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE (this “Supplemental Indenture”), dated as of
July 16, 2014, between AmSurg Corp., a Tennessee corporation (“AmSurg”), and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee under the Indenture referred to below (the “Trustee”). 

W I T N E S S E T H 
 WHEREAS,
AmSurg Escrow Corp., a Tennessee corporation (the “AmSurg Escrow”), has heretofore executed and delivered to the Trustee an indenture (the “Indenture”), dated as of July 16, 2014, providing for AmSurg
Escrow’s issuance of 5.625% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Notes”), initially in the aggregate principal amount of $1,100,000,000; 

WHEREAS, Section 4.17 of the Indenture provides that following the issuance of the Notes, AmSurg Escrow will merge with and into AmSurg,
with AmSurg surviving, and AmSurg will execute a supplemental indenture to assume all of AmSurg Escrow’s obligations and rights under the Indenture; 

WHEREAS, AmSurg Escrow has been merged with and into AmSurg; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.01 of the Indenture, the Trustee is authorized to execute and deliver this Supplemental Indenture. 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
AmSurg and the Trustee mutually covenant and agree for the equal and ratable benefit of the Holders as follows: 
 1.
CAPITALIZED TERMS. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Indenture. 

2. ASSUMPTION OF INDENTURE PROVISIONS. AmSurg hereby expressly assumes all of the
obligations and rights of the Issuer under the Indenture and all outstanding Notes. 
 3. NEW YORK LAW TO GOVERN. THE LAW OF THE STATE OF
NEW YORK SHALL GOVERN AND BE USED TO CONSTRUE THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE. 
 4. COUNTERPARTS. The parties may sign any
number of copies of this Supplemental Indenture. Each signed copy shall be an original, but all of them together represent the same agreement. 

5. EFFECT OF HEADINGS. The Section headings herein are for convenience only and shall not affect
the construction hereof. 
 6. THE TRUSTEE. The Trustee shall not be responsible in any manner whatsoever for
or in respect of the validity or sufficiency of this Supplemental Indenture or for or in respect of the recitals contained herein, all of which recitals are made solely by AmSurg. 

  
 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Supplemental Indenture to be duly
executed and attested, all as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	 ISSUER:

	
	AMSURG CORP.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Claire M. Gulmi

	 Name:
	 	 Claire M. Gulmi

	 Title:
	 	 Executive Vice President, Chief

Financial Officer and Secretary

	
	U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Wally Jones

	 Name:
	 	 Wally Jones

	 Title:
	 	Vice President


 [Signature Page to Supplemental Indenture]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4026 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

provide for the eligibility of Transportation Security Administration employees to receive public safety officers’ death benefits, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2014 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to provide for the eligibility of Transportation Security Administration employees to receive public safety officers’ death benefits, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Our Fallen 

5 TSA Officers Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4026 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION EM2 PLOYEES ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE PUBLIC 

3 SAFETY OFFICERS’ DEATH BENEFITS. 

4 Section 1204(9) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

5 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(9)) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

10 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

11 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(E) an employee of the Transportation 

14 Security Administration who is performing offi15 cial duties of the Administration, if those offi16 cial duties are related to protecting the Nation’s 

17 transportation systems to ensure freedom of 

18 movement for people and commerce.’’. 

19 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

20 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

21 take effect as if they had been enacted on October 31, 

22 2013. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the MATTER OF: I.S.D.

No. COA16-824

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: March 21, 2017

AFFIRMED.