alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

****

|   | **KPMG LLP      Chartered Accountants**      PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street      Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3      Canada | Telephone  (604)  691-3000      Fax              (604)  691-3031      Internet     www.kpmg.ca |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Consent  of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of DirectorsNevsun Resources Ltd.

We consent tothe use of our reports, each dated March 24, 2014, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting included in this annual report on Form 40-F.

CharteredAccountants

March 24, 2014Vancouver, Canada

|   | KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG       network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative       (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.      KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
State v. Donna Helms Ledbetter

402PA15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Meghan Adelle Jones, Attorney at Law, for Ledbetter, Donna Helms.

Ashleigh P. Dunston, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of December 2015 by State of NC to Strike Defendant's Reply to State's Response:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
In the Matter of: J.B. and J.B.

No. COA16-585

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 15, 2016

AFFIRMED.
State v. Andrew Darrin Ramseur

388A10-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 18, 2016

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, Andrew DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Ramseur, Andrew Darrin.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 15th of July 2016 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of July 2016."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 26th day of August 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
State of North Carolina, ex rel. William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary, North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management v. Jay Carter, a/k/a William Joseph Carter, a/k/a William Joseph Carter, IV, a/k/a William Joseph Carter, Sr.

No. 123P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

Wayne O. Clontz, Attorney at Law, Morganton, for Carter, Jay.

Teresa L. Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 5th of April 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of April 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."
State v. William Edward Godwin, III

167PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 22, 2016

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Godwin, William Edward (III).

Teresa L. Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 21st of December 2016 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of December 2016."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 11th day of January 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2008 – Commission v Netherlands**

**(Case C‐398/06)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Right of residence of nationals of Members States of the European Union and of the European Economic Area who are non-active
and pensioned persons – National legislation and administrative practice requiring personal resources sufficient for a stay of at least a year in
the host Member State

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 26)*

2.                     *Freedom of movement for persons – Right of entry and residence of nationals of Member States – Directives 68/360, 90/364 and
90/365 – Conditions for the issuing of a residence permit (Council Directives 68/360, Art. 9(1) and (3), 90/364 and 90/365)
(see paras 29, 31, operative part)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of the Community rules on the residence of citizens of the Union – National legislation and administrative practice requiring that, in order to obtain a residence permit, non‐active and pensioned persons must have adequate personal resources. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by maintaining in force national provisions under which, in order to obtain a residence permit, nationals of the European Union and of the European Economic Area who are non-active and retired must prove that they have sustainable resources, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 68/360/EEC of 15 October 1968 on the abolition of restrictions on movement and residence within the Community for workers of Member States and their families, Council Directive 90/364/EEC of 28 June 1990 on the right of residence and Council Directive 90/365/EEC of 28 June 1990 on the right of residence for employees and self-employed persons who have ceased their occupational activity; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs. |
Exhibit 14
 FENTURA FINANCIAL, INC.
CODE OF ETHICS
  1.
    
    I will act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of
interest in all personal and professional relationships.2.
    
    I will provide information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant,
timely and understandable.3.
    
    I will comply with the rules and regulations of federal, state, and local
governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.4.
    
    I will act in good faith, responsibly, and with due care. I will not
misrepresent material facts or allow my independent judgment to be subordinated or
otherwise compromised.5.
    
    I will respect and maintain the confidentiality of information reviewed or
acquired in carrying out my duties except when authorized or otherwise legally
obligated to disclose.6.
    
    I will share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to the needs
of the Company.7.
    
    I will proactively practice and promote ethical behavior as a professional in
my role with the Company.8.
    
    I will not solicit for myself or for a third party anything of value from
anyone in return for any business, service or confidential information of the Company,
nor will I accept anything of value from anyone (except for my wages and as otherwise
permitted by law) in connection with the business of the Company, either before or
after a transaction is discussed or completed.9.
    
    I will comply with and adhere to all of the Companys policies and practices,
including those policies governing accounting and financial reporting practices and
corporate governance.10.
    
    I will respond honestly and candidly when dealing with the Companys
independent and internal auditors, regulators and attorneys.11.
    
    I will promptly disclose to an appropriate person or persons any material transaction or
relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest,
and/or violations of this Code.
 (Signature)
    
    (Date)
    (Rvsd 01/05)
# Official Journal L 79/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 79 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 648 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 79

English edition

Legislation

Volume 648 March 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/399 of 19 January 2021 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the amounts of Union support for rural development in the year 2021 | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/400 of 2 March 2021 establishing a fisheries closure for haddock in area 7a for vessels flying the flag of Belgium | 4 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/401 of 5 March 2021 fixing the import duties applicable to certain types of husked rice from 8 March 2021 | 7 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/399 of 19 January 2021 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the amounts of Union support for rural development in the year 2021

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/400 of 2 March 2021 establishing a fisheries closure for haddock in area 7a for vessels flying the flag of Belgium

4

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/401 of 5 March 2021 fixing the import duties applicable to certain types of husked rice from 8 March 2021

7

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C o u r t o f A p p e a l s

o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

A T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Th e C o u rt o f A p p e a l s h e re b y p a sse s t h e f o l l o w i n g o rd e r:

A 1 9 A 0 4 4 0

. W

IL L I E J A

M E S M A

Y S v

. T H E ST A T E

.

I n Se p t e m

b e r 2 0 1 0

, W

i l l i e Ja m e s M a y s e n t e r e d a n e g o t i a

t e d g u i l t y p l e a t o

b u r g l a r y a n d w a s se n t e n c e d 2 0 y e a

r s w i t h t h e f i r st 5 y e a r s t o se r v e i n c o n f

i n e m e n t

.

W e a f f i r m e d t h e t r i a l c o u r t ’ s d e n i a l o f M a y s’ s m o t i o n t o w i t

h d r a w h i s p l e a a

n d

r e q u e st f o r a n o u t

- o f

- t i m e a p p e a l i n a n u n p u b l i s h e d o p i n i o n

. Se e M a y s v

. S t a t e

, C a se

N o

. A 1 2 A 0 5 3 4 ( d e c i d e d M a y 1 8

, 2 0 1 2 )

. I n M

a y 2 0 1 8

, t h e e n t i r e t y o f M

a y s’ s

p r o b a t i o n w a s r e v o k e d

. I n J

u l y 2 0 1 8

, M

a y s f i l e d a p r o se “

M o t i o n t o C o r r e c t V o i d

Se n t e n c e

, ” i n w h i c h h e c h a l l e n g e d t h e r e v o c a t i o n o f h i s p r o b a

t i o n

. T h e t

r i a l c o u r t

d e n i e d h i s m o t i o n

, a

n d M a y s f i l e d t h i s d i r e c t a

p p e a l

. W e

, h o w e v e r

, l a c k j u r i sd i c t i o n

.

B e c a u se t h e u n d e r l y i n g s u b

j e c t m a t t e r o f M a y s’ s a p p e a l i s t h e r e v o c a t i o n o f h i s

p r o b a t i o n

, h e w a s r e q u i r e d t o f i l e a n a p p l i c a t i o n f

o r d i sc r e t i o n a

r y a p p e a l t o o b t a i n

r e v i e w i n t

h i s C o u r t

. Se e O C G

A § 5

- 6

- 3 5 ( a ) ( 5 ) ; J

o n e s v

. S t a t e

, 3 2 2 G a

. A

p p

. 2 6 9

,

2 6 9 n

. 2 ( 7 4 5 SE

2 d 1 ) ( 2 0 1 3 ) ; Z a m o ra v

. S t a t e

, 2 2 6 G a

. A p p

. 1 0 5

, 1 0 5 ( 4 8 5 SE

2 d

2 1 4 ) ( 1 9 9 7 )

. H

i s f a i l u r e t o d o s o d e p r i v e s u s o f j u r i sd i c t i o n o v e r t h i s a p p e a l

.

A c c o r d i n g l y

, t

h i s a p p e a l i s h e r e b y D I SM

I SSE D

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g i a

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t l a n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t

r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g

n a t u r e a n d t

h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. October 24, 2018

10/24/2018
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50965

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIGUEL ANGEL GUTIERREZ-CHAVEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-213-ALL

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Miguel Angel Gutierrez-Chavez appeals his sentence following his guilty

plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. The district court enhanced Gutierrez-Chavez’s sentence by eight levels

based on a determination that his second state law conviction for possession of

marijuana qualified as an “aggravated felony.” 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 29, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50965

Gutierrez-Chavez contends that in light of the Supreme Court’s decision

in Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47 (2006), his second state law conviction does not

qualify as an aggravated felony. In United States v. Cepeda-Rios, 530 F.3d 333,

335-36 (5th Cir. 2008), we rejected the same arguments made by GutierrezChavez in this appeal. For the reasons set forth in Cepeda-Rios, we also affirm

Gutierrez-Chavez’s sentence.

In light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Gutierrez-Chavez

challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and

aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the

offense that must be found by a jury. This argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872

(2008).

AFFIRMED.
JUDGMENT OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber)

9 October 2008

Case F-49/06

**Bart Nijs**

**v**

**Court of Auditors of the European Communities**

(Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2005 promotion procedure)

**Application:**brought under Articles 236 EC and 152 EA, in which Mr Nijs seeks annulment of the decision not to promote him in 2005 and
of ‘any connected and/or subsequent decision’, and an order for the Court of Auditors to compensate him for all the material
and non-material harm he claims to have suffered as a result of the irregularities allegedly committed by the Court of Auditors.

**Held:**The action is dismissed as partly inadmissible and partly unfounded. The applicant is ordered to pay all the costs.

**Summary**

*Procedure – Costs – Costs caused unreasonably or vexatiously*

*(Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 87(3), second subpara.)*

The second subparagraph of Article 87(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance must be applied and an official
ordered to pay all the costs of the proceedings where he has put forward particularly unreasonable challenges largely based
on conjecture and insinuations which are not relevant to the subject-matter of the action or any other pleadings, and from
which certain passages have had to be removed because of their defamatory nature.

(see paras 81-82)
STATE v. Nathaniel Malone CHINA

95A17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2017

*304Richard Croutharmel, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for China, Nathaniel Malone.

Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of March 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2017."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                       0000930832
<NAME>                      JETFLEET III
<MULTIPLIER>                1
<CURRENCY>                  U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>              1
<CASH>                                         3,780,740
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     63,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,844,530
<PP&E>                                        10,396,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,472,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13,765,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            914,370
<BONDS>                                       11,076,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,661,450
<COMMON>                                         815,200
<OTHER-SE>                                      (701,660)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13,765,710
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,022,190
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 518,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               456,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   47,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                         920
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               46,110
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      46,110
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.06



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                      PROJECT SOFTWARE & DEVELOPMENT, INC.

                              List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Subsidiary                                  Jurisdiction of         Ownership
------------------                                  ---------------         ---------
                                                     Incorporation 
                                                     -------------
<S>                                                 <C>                     <C> 
PSDI International Software, Inc.                      Delaware                 (1)
PSDI Security Corporation                              Massachusetts            (1)
Maintenance Automation Corporation                     Florida                  (1)
PSDI International Holdings Inc.                       Delaware                 (2)
PSDI Export, Inc.                                      Barbados                 (2)
PSDI (UK) Ltd.                                         United Kingdom           (2)
PSDI Canada Limited                                    Canada                   (2)
PSDI France SARL                                       France                   (2)
PSDI Australia PTY. Ltd.                               Australia                (2)
PSDI Deutschland GmbH                                  Germany                  (2)
PSDI Europe, Ltd                                       United Kingdom           (2)
PSDI Espana S.A.                                       Spain                    (2)
PSDI Benelux N.V.                                      Netherlands              (2)
PSDI Norden AB                                         Sweden                   (2)
PSDI Japan K.K.                                        Japan                    (2)
PSDI (Thailand) Limited                                Thailand                 (2)
PSDI India                                             India                    (2)
PSDI Brasil Ltda.                                      Brazil                   (3)
</TABLE>


(1) All of the outstanding capital stock is owned by Project Software &
Development, Inc.

(2) All of the outstanding capital stock (other than certain qualifying shares
required in the jurisdiction of organization and representing from 0% to 2% of
the outstanding capital stock), is owned by PSDI International Software, Inc.

(3) 4,950 shares are owned by PSDI International Software, Inc. and 50 shares
are owned by PSDI International Holdings, Inc.
State of North Carolina v. Linda Beth Chekanow and Robert David Bishop

No. 390PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2017

J. Clark Fischer, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Chekanow, Linda Beth, et al.

Adrian Dellinger, Associate Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

J. Clark Fisher, Attorney at Law.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 18th of October 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of November 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).