alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4019 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4019

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the expensing of 
                  certain depreciable business assets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2014

   Mr. Murphy of Florida (for himself, Mr. Joyce, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. 
    Chabot, Mr. Cartwright, Mr. Tipton, Ms. Kuster, Mr. Vargas, Mr. 
 Swalwell of California, and Mr. Owens) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the expensing of 
                  certain depreciable business assets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Investment Act of 
2014''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXPENSING LIMITATION.

    (a) Dollar Limitation.--Paragraph (1) of section 179(b) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or 2013'' in subparagraph (B) and 
        inserting ``2013, 2014, or 2015'', and
            (2) by striking ``after 2013'' in subparagraph (C) and 
        inserting ``after 2015''.
    (b) Reduction in Limitation.--Paragraph (2) of section 179(b) of 
such Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or 2013'' in subparagraph (B) and 
        inserting ``2013, 2014, or 2015'', and
            (2) by striking ``after 2013'' in subparagraph (C) and 
        inserting ``after 2015''.
    (c) Computer Software.--Clause (ii) of section 179(d)(1)(A) of such 
Code is amended by striking ``before 2014'' and inserting ``before 
2016''.
    (d) Election.--Paragraph (2) of section 179(c) of such Code is 
amended by striking ``before 2014'' and inserting ``before 2016''.
    (e) Special Rules for Treatment of Qualified Real Property.--
            (1) In general.--Paragraph (1) of section 179(f) of such 
        Code is amended by striking ``or 2013'' and inserting ``2013, 
        2014, or 2015''.
            (2) Carryover.--Paragraph (4) of section 179(f) of such 
        Code is amended by striking ``2013'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``2015''.
    (f) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
Melissa Lennon, Employee, Plaintiff, v. N.C. Judicial Department, N.C. Administrative Office of the Courts, Harnett County Clerk of Superior Court Employer, Self-insured (Corvel Corporatoin, Third-Party Administrator), Defendant.

No. COA16-476

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-144-CR

TYSON MONTRELL BANKS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received

this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex. R. App.

P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: October 9, 2008
Gary Warren Spruill, Plaintiff, v. Westfield Insurance Company, Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants.

No. COA15-1329

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       6,785,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,449,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    729,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,803,000
<PP&E>                                      68,874,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,078,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,477,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       83,947,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (18,097,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,477,000
<SALES>                                     76,037,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            76,037,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               71,295,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,385,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,584,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,227,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,227,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,227,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.12)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Steven Purcell, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alternative Resources Corporation, as amended (the "annual report");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: April 28, 2004 |  | /s/STEVEN PURCELLSteven Purcell Chief Financial
Officer
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10204

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIGUEL ANGEL GUZMAN

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-152-ALL

Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel Angel Guzman

raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. GomezHerrera, 523 F.3d 554, 557-64 (5th Cir.), petition for cert. filed (July 2, 2008) (No.

08-5226) which held that any disparity in sentencing between fast-track and

non-fast-track jurisdictions is a function of Congressional policy and is not

“unwarranted” under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6). He also raises arguments that are

foreclosed by United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 808 (5th Cir.),

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 8, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-10204

2

petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2008) (No. 08-5514) which held that the lack of

a fast-track program does not resultin a violation of equal protection rights. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
State of North Carolina v. Antravis Quanealious Briggs

No. 342P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Brendan O'Donnell, Attorney at Law, Antravious Q. Briggs, for Briggs, Antravis Quanealious.

Roberta A. Ouellette, Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer Harjo, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of September 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136806 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136806 

 COA: 284962 

Arenac CC: 07-003301-FH 

JAMES ALLEN STEWARD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
Taylor v. Lewis

301P16-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 29, 2016

Michael Anthony Taylor, for Taylor, Michael Anthony.

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of December 2016 by Petitioner to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of December 2016."
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 22 February 2008 – Base v Commission**

**(Case T-295/06)**

Action for annulment –Telecommunications – Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC – Wholesale market for voice call termination on individual mobile networks in Belgium – Significant power on the market – Commission’s comments letter – Non-actionable measure – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Meaning – Measures producing binding legal effects (Art. 230 EC; Directive of
the European Parliament and Council 2002/21, Arts 7(2) to (5), 8(3)(d) and 16(4)) (see paras 56, 62-63, 66-69)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Actionable measures (Art. 230 EC; Directive of the European Parliament and Council 2002/21, Art. 7(3)
and (4) (see paras 75‐78)*

3.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Whether directly concerned
– Criteria (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; Directive of the European Parliament and Council 2002/21, Art. 7(3) and (5)) (see
paras 119-121)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the letter of the Commission of 4 August 2006, addressed to the Institut belge des services postaux et des telecommunications (Belgian Institute of Post and Telecommunications Services) containing comments, pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33), concerning a draft decision notified by that institute (Case BE/2006/0433). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Base NV to pay its own costs and the costs of the Commission; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders Mobistar SA and the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay their own costs. |
EXHIBIT
32.1
  
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Vanguard Minerals Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vladimir Fedyunin, in my capacity as President, Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/ Vladimir
      FedyuninDate:  
      May 15, 2009
                    Vladimir
      Fedyunin
                      President,
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and
      Director
  EXHIBIT
32.2
  
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Vanguard Minerals Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vladimir Fedyunin, in my capacity as President, Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/ Vladimir
      FedyuninDate:  
      May 15, 2009
                  Vladimir
      Fedyunin
                    President,
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and
      Director
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert Earl, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form
10-Q of BH/RE, L.L.C.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: August 4, 2004
    
    /s/ Robert EarlRobert EarlManager
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50275

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MUNDO VIERO-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-99-CR-601-1 

--------------------

October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mundo Viero-Martinez appeals the 45-month term of

imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of

being found in the United States after removal in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid

because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment

prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 

Viero-Martinez complains that his sentence was improperly

enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior

removal following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues
No. 01-50275 

-2-

that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause. 

Alternatively, Viero-Martinez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues

that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his

increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. 

Viero-Martinez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issues for

Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). VieroMartinez’s arguments are foreclosed. The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3948 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3948

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
      15-year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold 
  improvements, qualified restaurant buildings and improvements, and 
                     qualified retail improvements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
      15-year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold 
  improvements, qualified restaurant buildings and improvements, and 
                     qualified retail improvements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF 15-YEAR STRAIGHT-LINE COST RECOVERY FOR 
              QUALIFIED LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS, QUALIFIED RESTAURANT 
              BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS, AND QUALIFIED RETAIL 
              IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Clauses (iv), (v), and (ix) of section 
168(e)(3)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by 
striking ``January 1, 2014'' and inserting ``January 1, 2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```