alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of UAP Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the twenty-six week period ended August 27, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, L. Kenneth Cordell, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 5, 2006



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ L. Kenneth Cordell               
|    |  | L. Kenneth Cordell                   
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | Principal Executive Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. James Michael SMITH

No. 224P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

*231John R. Mills, Attorney at Law, for Smith, James Michael.

Scott T. Slusser, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of June 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136727 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136727 

 COA: 285117 

Kent CC: 07-008371-FH 

IDRIS QUENTILL WILKES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006). 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             965
<SECURITIES>                                       270
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,433
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          81,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,246
<BONDS>                                            481
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           293
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,208
<SALES>                                         31,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               254,096
<CGS>                                           20,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  348,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (677)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (107,543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,828)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (110,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (110,371)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.77)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Fred M. Powell, Chief Financial Officer of BMP Sunstone Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, based on my
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as am ended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ FRED M. POWELL                                     
|Fred M. Powell
Chief Financial Officer
November 9, 2010
STATE

v.

Rayford Lewis BURKE

181A93-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 9, 2016

Franklin E. Wells, Jr., Attorney at Law, Asheboro, Gretchen Engel, Attorney at Law, Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Durham, for Burke, Rayford Lewis.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mikko Red Arrow, Assistant District Attorney, Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Christopher A. Brook, Legal Director, Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, James Coleman, Attorney at Law, Irving Joyner, Attorney at Law, Durham, Cassandra Stubbs, Attorney at Law, for ACLU Capital Punishment Project, et al.

***Amended***

The following order has been entered on the motion to amend Petitioner-Appellant's brief filed on the 8th of September 2016 by Petitioner:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of September 2016."

Ervin, J., recused.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 178 (Thursday, September 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18277]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (05-135)]


NASA Advisory Council, Aeronautics Research Advisory Committee; 
Council of Deans Subcommittee; Vehicle Systems Program Subcommittee; 
Aviation Safety and Security Program Subcommittee; Meetings

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register Citations of Previous Announcements

    Volume 70, Number 166, Page 51092, Notice Number 05-130, August 29, 
2005; Volume 70, Number 166, Page 51092, Notice Number 05-131, August 
29, 2005; Volume 70, Number 154, Page 46891, Notice Number 05-128, 
August 11, 2005; Volume 70, Number 154, Page 46892, Notice Number 05-
127, August 11, 2005.

Previously Announced Dates of Meetings

    Tuesday, September 20, 2005, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Wednesday, 
September 21, 2005, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Monday, September 19, 2005, 9 
a.m. to 5 p.m.; Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; 
Thursday, September 8, 2005, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. These meetings will be 
rescheduled.
    Contact Person For More Information: Mary-Ellen McGrath (202) 358-
4729.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-18277 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 552/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 552/2014 of 22 May 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative            prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 552/2014                     

# of 22 May 2014

# amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No                           234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1) and in particular Article 183(b) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Commission Regulation (EC) No 1484/95(2) lays down detailed rules for implementing the system of additional import duties and fixes representative prices in the poultrymeat                              and egg sectors and for egg albumin.

(2)Regular monitoring of the data used to determine representative prices for poultrymeat and egg products and for egg albumin                              shows that the representative import prices for certain products should be amended to take account of variations in price                              according to origin.

(3)Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 should be amended accordingly.

(4)Given the need to ensure that this measure applies as soon as possible after the updated data have been made available, this                              Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 May 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### “‘ANNEX I

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 47.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4081 

To prohibit funds made available to the Department of Education or the 

Department of Justice from being used to provide postsecondary courses 

in prisons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2014 

Mr. COLLINS of New York (for himself, Mr. REED, and Mr. GIBSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit funds made available to the Department of Education or the Department of Justice from being used 

to provide postsecondary courses in prisons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR COLLEGE 

4 COURSES IN PRISONS. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no funds 

6 made available to the Department of Education or the De7 partment of Justice shall be used to provide or assist in 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4081 IH

1 providing a postsecondary course to an inmate in a Fed2 eral or State prison. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
State v. Leonard Paul Schalow

4P17-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 6, 2017

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Schalow, Leonard Paul.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Newman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of January 2017 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of January 2017."
STATE v. Antwan ANTHONY

324A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 18, 2016

Ms. Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Attorney at Law, For Anthony, Antwan.

Ms. Kimberly Robb, Assistant District Attorney, Mr. Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of November 2016 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Prepare Trial Transcript:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of November 2016."

Court reporter shall have up to and including the 21st day of December 2016 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel.
State of North Carolina v. Daniel Hopkins, Defendant.

No. COA15-941

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 18, 2016

REVERSED and REMANDED for NEW TRIAL.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4072 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4072

To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to any Federal department or 
 agency to provide technical assistance to nongovernment entities for 
    the production of motion pictures, television shows, and other 
                         audiovisual programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 21, 2014

Mr. Barrow of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to any Federal department or 
 agency to provide technical assistance to nongovernment entities for 
    the production of motion pictures, television shows, and other 
                         audiovisual programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL 
              ASSISTANCE FOR MOTION PICTURES, TELEVISION SHOWS, AND 
              OTHER AUDIOVISUAL PROGRAMS.

    No Federal department or agency may obligate or expend funds 
appropriated to the department or agency for a fiscal year to provide 
technical assistance to any nongovernment entity for the production of 
any motion picture, television show, documentary, music videos, 
commercial advertisement, CD-ROM game, or other audiovisual program.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                      PROJECT SOFTWARE & DEVELOPMENT, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                              --------------------
Name of Subsidiary                Jurisdiction of              Ownership
------------------                Incorporation                ---------
                                  -------------
PSDI International                Delaware                        (1)
Software, Inc.
PSDI Security Corporation         Massachusetts                   (1)
PSDI International                Delaware                        (2)
Holdings, Inc.
PSDI Export, Inc.                 Barbados                        (2)
PSDI (UK) Limited                 United Kingdom                  (2)
PSDI Canada Limited               Canada                          (2)
PSDI France S.A.R.L.              France                          (2)
PSDI Australia Pty.               Australia                       (2)
Limited
PSDI Deutschland, GmbH            Germany                         (2)
PSDI Europe Ltd.                  United Kingdom                  (2)
PSDI Espana S.A.                  Spain                           (2)
PSDI Benelux NV                   Netherlands                     (2)
PSDI Norden AB                    Sweden                          (2)
PSDI Japan K.K.                   Japan                           (2)
PSDI (Thailand) Limited           Thailand                        (2)
PSDI India Private Limited        India                           (2)
PSDI Brasil Ltda.                 Brazil                          (3)
PSDI Hong Kong Limited            Hong Kong                       (2)
PSDI Mexico S.A. de C.V.          Mexico                          (3)
PSDI Computer Software            China                           (1)
Development (Shanghai) Co.
Ltd.
PSDI Italia s.r.l.                Italy                         (1 & 2)
MRO.com, Inc.                     Delaware                        (1)
MRO.com, Limited                  United Kingdom                  (4)
MRO.com, Limited                  Canada                          (4)
MRO.com Pty Limited               Australia                       (4)
MRO.com (Asia) Limited            Hong Kong                       (4)


(1) All of the outstanding capital stock is owned by Project Software &
    Development, Inc.


<PAGE>   2


(2)      All of the outstanding capital stock (other than certain qualifying
         shares required in the jurisdiction of organization and representing
         from 0% to 2% of the outstanding capital stock), is owned by PSDI
         International Software, Inc.

(3)      4,950 shares are owned by PSDI International Software, Inc. and 50
         shares are owned by PSDI International Holdings, Inc.

(4)      All outstanding capital stock is owned by MRO.com, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 690 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 690

 To amend the Small Business Act to authorize the Administrator of the 
 Small Business Administration to waive the prohibition on duplication 
                 of certain disaster relief assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2007

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Small Business Act to authorize the Administrator of the 
 Small Business Administration to waive the prohibition on duplication 
                 of certain disaster relief assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Catastrophic Disaster Recovery 
Improvements Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF PROHIBITION ON DUPLICATION OF CERTAIN BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
636(b)) is amended by inserting immediately after paragraph (3) the 
following:
            ``(4) Waiver of prohibition on duplication of certain 
        benefits.--For any major disaster (as that term is defined in 
        section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
        Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), in providing 
        assistance under paragraph (1) or (2), the Administrator may 
        waive, in whole or in part, the prohibition on the duplication 
        of benefits, including whether damage or destruction has been 
        compensated for by, credit is available from, activities are 
        reimbursable through, or funds have been made available from 
        any other source.''.
    (b) Applicability and Retroactivity for Victims of Hurricanes 
Katrina, Rita, and Wilma.--The amendment made by this section shall 
apply to any assistance under section 7(b) of the Small Business Act 
(15 U.S.C. 636(b)) provided on or after August 29, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
**Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 December 2009 – Notartel v OHIM – SAT.1 (R.U.N.)**

**(Case T-490/07)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark R.U.N. – Earlier Community and national word marks ‘ran’ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) – Partial refusal of registration)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 52, 71)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 October 2007 (Case R 1267/2006-4) concerning opposition proceedings between SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH and Notartel SpA – Società informatica del Notariato. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Notartel SpA – Sociétà informatica del Notariato |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark R.U.N. for services in Classes 35, 38 and 42 – Application No 1069863 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Community and national word mark ran, for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 38, 41 and 42 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition dismissed |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal allowed in part, in respect of some services in Classes 38 and 42 |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Notartel SpA – Società informatica del Notariato to pay the costs. |