alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 





 


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


 


 


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders


Plymouth Opportunity REIT, Inc.


Boston, Massachusetts


 


We have audited the accompanying statements
of revenue over certain operating expenses (the "Statements") of the property known as TCG 5400 FIB LP (the “Property”)
for the period January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013, and for the year ended December 31, 2012, and the related notes.


 


Management’s Responsibility for the
Statements


 


Management is responsible for the preparation
and fair presentation of the Statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America;
this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation
of the Statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.


 


Auditors’ Responsibility


 


Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the Statements are free from material misstatement.


 


An audit involves performing procedures to
obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the Statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the Statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making
those risk assessments, the auditors consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation
of the Statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the Statements.


 


We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.


 


The accompanying Statements were prepared for
the purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (for inclusion in the Form 8-K
of Plymouth Opportunity REIT, Inc.) as described in Note 2 to the Statements and are not intended to be a complete presentation
of the Property’s revenue and expenses.


 




Opinion


 


In our opinion, the Statements of the Property
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the revenue over certain operating expenses described in Note 2 to
the Statements of the Property for the period January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013, and for the year ended December 31, 2012,
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


 


 


/s/ Braver PC     


Needham, Massachusetts


December 4, 2013
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4031 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

removal of Senior Executive Service employees of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs for performance, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4031 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Vet3 erans Affairs Management Accountability Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE EM5 PLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VET6 ERANS AFFAIRS FOR PERFORMANCE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 38, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing new section: 

10 ‘‘§ 713. Senior Executive Service: removal based on 

11 performance 

12 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro13 vision of law, the Secretary may remove any individual 

14 from the Senior Executive Service if the Secretary deter15 mines the performance of the individual warrants such re16 moval. If the Secretary so removes such an individual, the 

17 Secretary may— 

18 ‘‘(1) remove the individual from Federal serv19 ice; or 

20 ‘‘(2) transfer the individual to a General Sched21 ule position at any grade of the General Schedule 

22 the Secretary determines appropriate. 

23 ‘‘(b) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days 

24 after removing an individual from the Senior Executive 

25 Service under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit 

26 to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and 
3 

•HR 4031 EH

1 House of Representatives notice in writing of such removal 

2 and the reason for such removal. 

3 ‘‘(c) MANNER OF REMOVAL.—A removal under this 

4 section shall be done in the same manner as the removal 

5 of a professional staff member employed by a Member of 

6 Congress.’’. 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

8 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

9 at the end the following new item: 

‘‘713. Senior Executive Service: removal based on performance.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4031 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide 

for performance, and for other purposes. ployees of the Department of Veterans Affairs for the removal of Senior Executive Service em-
STATE of North Carolina v. Jarvis Montrale BELL

No. 31P17

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

John F. Carella, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Bell, Jarvis Montrale.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender.

Perry J. Pelaez, Assistant Attorney General, Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of January 2017 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>                     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                             INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
                             STATEMENTS OF HEMASURE INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
                             ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                             ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                          U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                    1,274
<SECURITIES>                              6,882
<RECEIVABLES>                               436
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                 158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          9,097
<PP&E>                                    3,249
<DEPRECIATION>                            1,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           10,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     3,026
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        82
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              (1,549)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             10,607
<SALES>                                   2,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          2,357
<CGS>                                     4,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             4,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          9,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (1,401)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (9,884)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (9,884)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (9,884)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SouthCrest
      Financial Group, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      for
      the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “ Periodic
      Report ”),
      the
      undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant
      to
      Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his individual knowledge and
      belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 14, 2006




/s/
                Larry T. KuglarLarry
                T. Kuglar****Chief
                Executive Officer****
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Division of Medical Assistance v. PARKER HOME CARE, LLC and Division of Medical Assistance, N.C. Department of Health and Human Services v. Parker Home Care, LLC

No. 175P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Mr. Michael T. Wood, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. Brenda Eaddy, Assistant Attorney General, For N.C. Deparment of Health and Human Services, et al.

Mr. Matthew W. Wolfe, Ms. Renee J. Montgomery, Mr. Robert A. Leandro, Attorneys at Law, For Parker Home Care, LLC

Mr. Justin Richman, Mr. Richard P. Leissner, Jr., Mr. Andrew M. Walsh, Ms. Evelyn M Savage, Ms. Tracy J. Hayes, Mrs. Carol W. Hammett, Mr. James D. Wall, Attorneys at Law, For Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, et al.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of May 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 10th of May 2016 for Writ of Supersedes of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of May 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

Submitted October 1, 2008

Decided October 15, 2008

AMENDED October 16, 2008

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

     RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

  JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

No. 08‐1291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

THOMAS KING,

Defendant‐Appellant.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:99‐cr‐00952‐1

Ruben Castillo,

     Judge.

O R D E R

The defendant‐appellant in this case was convicted of:  (1) conspiracy to distribute in

excess of 50 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (Count One); (2) distribution

of 123.5 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (Count Two); and (3) using a

communication facility to facilitate a drug crime, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) (Counts

Three ‐ Six).  On appeal, this court affirmed the convictions butremanded the matterto the trial

courtforre‐sentencing post‐Booker.  (United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005.)   The defendant‐

appellant now appeals the new sentence.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 08‐1291 Page 2

This court has carefully reviewed the Amended Judgement in a Criminal Case issued

by the District Court on February 4, 2008, the record on appeal, and the briefs filed by the

parties.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this case is summarily affirmed.
DAVIDSON COUNTY BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., Larry W. Edwards, and wife, Shirley Edwards v. IREDELL COUNTY v. Wayne McConnell, Rusty N. McConnell, Ann and Don Scott, Bill Mitchell, and David Lowery, Intervening Respondents

No. 314P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2017

Allegra Collins, Attorney at Law, for Davidson County Broadcasting Company, Inc., et al.

Lisa Valdez, Attorney at Law, Alex M. Graziano, Attorney at Law, for Iredell County.

Thomas E. Terrell, Jr., Attorney at Law, Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, for McConnell, Wayne, et al.

Charles F. Marshall, III, Attorney at Law, S. Wilson Quick, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Broadcasters.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of August 2016 by Petitioners in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4131 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow States to regulate tow 

truck operations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2014 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Ms. JACKSON LEE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow States 

to regulate tow truck operations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Preda5 tory Towing Enforcement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REGULATION OF TOW TRUCK OPERATORS. 

7 Section 14501(c)(2)(C) of title 49, United States 

8 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the price of’’ and all that 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4131 IH

1 follows through ‘‘transportation is’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

2 regulation of tow truck operations’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3833 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify the Medicare 

durable medical equipment face-to-face encounter documentation requirement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2014 

Mr. MCDERMOTT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify 

the Medicare durable medical equipment face-to-face encounter documentation requirement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFYING MEDICARE DURABLE MEDICAL 

4 EQUIPMENT FACE-TO-FACE ENCOUNTER 

5 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT. 

6 Section 1834(a)(11)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act 

7 (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(11)(B)(ii)) is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3833 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘the physician documenting 

2 that’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘has had a face-to-face encoun4 ter’’ and inserting ‘‘documenting such physician, 

5 physician assistant, practitioner, or specialist has 

6 had a face-to-face encounter’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136693 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136693 

 COA: 267238 

Livingston CC: 05-014970-FH

GARY STEVEN UPHAUS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 11, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5258-5259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1910]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Courtside products, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

January 28, 2005
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the 
public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of 
trading in the securities of Courtside Products, Inc. (``Courtside''). 
The Commission is concerned that Courtside may have unjustifiably 
relied on Rule 504 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 in 
conducting an unlawful distribution of its securities which failed to 
comply with the resale restrictions of Regulation D. Courtside, a 
company that has made no public filings with the Commission or the 
NASD, is quoted on the Pink Sheets under the ticker symbol CSDP, and 
has recently been the subject of spam e-mail touting the company's 
shares.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. e.s.t. January 28, 
2005 through 11:59 p.m. e.s.t., on February 10, 2005.


[[Page 5259]]


    By the Commission.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-1910 Filed 1-28-05; 3:01 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DIME BANCORP
INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         158,753
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,627
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                19,550
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,589,572
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,363,971
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         4,279,937
<LOANS>                                     10,853,382
<ALLOWANCE>                                    106,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,870,108
<DEPOSITS>                                  12,856,739
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,908,677
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            175,841
<LONG-TERM>                                    906,514
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,083
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,021,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              18,870,108
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                784,109
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              540,252
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                26,337
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,350,698
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             531,216
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             889,403
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          461,295
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   41,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (11,265)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                344,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                154,240
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     154,240
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   104,256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.40
<LOANS-NON>                                    191,590
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               213,007
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               128,295
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   71,296
<RECOVERIES>                                     8,496
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              106,495
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           106,495
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>