alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 (the “Report”) of Hercules Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Scott Bluestein, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| Date: July 30, 2020 | By:    | /S/ SCOTT BLUESTEIN

                        |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Scott Bluestein                                   |
|                |   | President, Chief Executive Officer, and |
|                |   | Chief Investment Officer

         |
# C_2009055EN.01002401.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/24

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 January 2009 — Commission v Rednap

(Case T-352/07) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Contracts concluded in the context of the fourth framework programme of activities in the fields of research and technological development and demonstration - Rise and Healthline projects - Non-compliance of part of the declared expenditure with the contractual provisions - Repayment of part of the advances paid - Default proceedings)

(2009/C 55/43)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and J. Enegren, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Rednap AB (Malmö, Sweden)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought by the Commission under Article 238 EC seeking repayment of part of the advances paid by the Community under the contracts DE 3010 (DE) Rise and HC 4007 (HC) Healthline, and payment of default interest

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | orders Rednap AB to repay to the Commission the sum of EUR 334 375,49; |
| --- | --- |

1.

orders Rednap AB to repay to the Commission the sum of EUR 334 375,49;

| 2. | orders Rednap to pay to the Commission default interest on the sum of EUR 219 125,22 from 1 June 2002 at the statutory rate under Greek law until the debt is totally discharged, which rate may not, however, as from 1 August 2007, exceed 11,75 % per annum; |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Rednap to pay to the Commission default interest on the sum of EUR 219 125,22 from 1 June 2002 at the statutory rate under Greek law until the debt is totally discharged, which rate may not, however, as from 1 August 2007, exceed 11,75 % per annum;

| 3. | orders Rednap to pay to the Commission default interest on the sum of EUR 115 250,27 from 31 May 2002 at the statutory rate under Greek law until the debt is totally discharged, which rate may not, however, as from 1 August 2007, exceed 11,75 % per annum; |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders Rednap to pay to the Commission default interest on the sum of EUR 115 250,27 from 31 May 2002 at the statutory rate under Greek law until the debt is totally discharged, which rate may not, however, as from 1 August 2007, exceed 11,75 % per annum;

| 4. | orders Rednap to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

orders Rednap to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31

                       QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Stephen Samuels, certify that:


1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cameron
     International, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of August, 2005.


/s/ Stephen Samuels
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**CFO CERTIFICATIONI, Joseph V. Green, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Winston Hotels, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 16, 2007       /s/ Joseph V. Green         Joseph V. Green    Chief Financial Officer  
107
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: REASSIGNMENT OF JUDGE OF
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

:

: No. 366 Common Pleas Judicial
Classification Docket

O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2021, upon consideration of the

Petition of Kim Berkeley Clark, President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of the

Fifth Judicial District of Pennsylvania, for the reassignment of a Judge to a division of

the court, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition is granted and the following

reassignment is approved:

From the Family Division t o the Criminal Division

The Honorable Elliot C. Howsie
State of North Carolina v. Jason Todd Laws, Defendant.

No. COA16-134

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

NO ERROR.
# C_2008327EN.01004102.xml

| 20.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/41

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 October 2008 — Azivo Algemeen Ziekenfonds De Volharding v Commission

(Case T-84/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 327/73)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Alternative Resources Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge:



|/s/ROBERT P. STANOJEVRobert P. Stanojev,Chief
Executive Officer |  | Date: March 30, 2004
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|/s/STEVEN PURCELLSteven Purcell,Chief Financial Officer         |  | Date: March 30, 2004

---

QuickLinks
ORDER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

(First Chamber)

7 October 2009

Case F-122/07

**Luigi Marcuccio**

**v**

**Commission of the European Communities**

(Civil service – Officials – Request for investigation – Refusal of an institution to translate a decision into the language chosen by the applicant – Manifest inadmissibility – Application manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

**Application:**brought under Articles 236 EC and 152 EA, in which Mr Marcuccio seeks, principally, annulment of the Commission’s decision
rejecting his request that an investigation be carried out in relation to certain events with which he claims to have been
confronted during 2001 and 2003, as well as an order that the Commission pay him damages.

**Held:**The applicant’s action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, as manifestly lacking any foundation
in law. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

**Summary**

*Officials – Administration’s duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Obligation to address to an official an individual
decision worded in a language of which he has a thorough knowledge*

*(Art. 21 EC; Charter of Fundamental Rights, Art. 41(4); Rules of Procedure of the Commission, Annex, para. 4)*

The institutions are under a duty to have regard for the welfare of their officials and therefore to address to an official
an individual decision worded in a language of which he has a thorough knowledge.

It cannot be inferred from the third paragraph of Article 21 EC, or from paragraph 4 of the Code of good administrative conduct,
or from Article 41(4) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights that every decision addressed by a Community institution to one
of its officials should be drawn up in the initial language of correspondence. Those provisions are applicable to relations
between the institutions and their staff only where the latter address a document to the institutions solely in their capacity
as citizens of the European Union and not in their capacity as officials or other staff of the Communities. If the institutions
were obliged, in all events, to reply to a request from an official in the same language as that used in that request, it
would result in insurmountable difficulties for the institutions.

(see paras 60-65)

See:

T-197/98 *Rudolph* v *Commission* [2000] ECR-SC I‐A‐55 and II‐241, para. 46; T-118/99 *Bonaiti Brighina* v *Commission* [2001] ECR-SC I‐A‐25 and II‐97, para. 13; T-95/04 *Lavagnoli* v *Commission* [2006] ECR-SC I‐A‐2‐121 and II‐A‐2‐569, para. 48

F‐51/05 and F‐18/06 *Duyster* v *Commission* [2007] ECR-SC I‐A‐1‐0000 and II‐A‐1‐0000, paras 58 and 59
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23

                       Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP









The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Horizon Financial Services Corporation:

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (No. 33-87030 and 33-94324) on Form S-8 of Horizon Financial
Services Corporation of our report dated July 30, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Horizon Financial Services Corporation and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year ended June 30, 1997, which report appears in the June
30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Horizon Financial Services
Corporation and subsidiaries.



                                                         KPMG Peat Marwick LLP





Des Moines, Iowa
September 25, 1997
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of NES Rentals Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael D. Milligan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/  MICHAEL D. MILLIGAN                                        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                            |   |
| Michael  D. Milligan                                            |   |
| Senior  Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May  12, 2005                                                   |   |

 

 

 

                Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

EXHIBIT 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICP SolarTechnologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Sass Peress, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

/s/ *Sass Peress*------------------------------- Sass Peress Chief Executive Officer December 21, 2009 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company'sForm 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United StatesCode) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separatedisclosure document. 

----
Exhibit 31.1



Certifications



I, J.A. Cardwell, Sr., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 25, 2004

|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|                                                
|/s/    J.A. Cardwell, Sr.                       
|                                                
|(J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                            
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael D’Avila, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 515]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), rendered August 3, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal was not valid because it was based on an incorrect statement of law *(cf. People v Brown,*13 AD3d 548, 549 [2004]). However, the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the sentencing court failed to exercise any discretion in imposing sentence *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
1108.

#### Jones *v.*Poole.

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

Argued June 10,

Decided November 10, 1908.

*Land & Hall,*for plaintiff in error. *Crum & Jones,*contra.

Russell, J.

1. This case is practically identical as to its facts with that of *Anderson*v. *Hall,*3 *Ga. App.*555 (60 S. E. 294) ; and the writ of error must be dismissed. There is no exception to a final judgment in the court below. It does not appear from the record that a final judgment was rendered. Furthermore, the exceptions to the refusal of the amendment were not preserved pendente lite, nor would a different result have been reached had the trial judge allowed the amendment.

2. This court is without jurisdiction to consider a direct bill of exceptions to a ruling made pendente lite, unless there be at least a general exception to the final judgment. *Lyndon*v. *Ga. Ry. & Elec. Co.,*129 *Ga.*361 (58 S. E. 1047).

3. When a writ of error is dismissed in this court, damages for delay are not recoverable. *Writ of error dismissed.*