alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SUPERGEN,
INC., DECEMBER 31, 1996 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      13,914,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,573,951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,149,630
<PP&E>                                         654,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                 243,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,873,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,166,578
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    40,026,551
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,873,416
<SALES>                                        225,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               263,677
<CGS>                                          282,777
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  282,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,488,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,757,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,757,635
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,757,635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6572

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-6774

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 22, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. John Charles Duane, Eric

John Klumb, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals

the district court’s orders denying his motion for a reduction in

sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), his request for a

reduction in sentence based on substantial assistance, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(e) (2000), and his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Snipe, No. 2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2008,

Apr. 16, 2008, & Apr. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23-1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
CKE Restaurants, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

        We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-83621, 333-83601, 333-76377, 333-51103, 333-52633, 333-62421,
33-56313, 33-55337, 333-12399, 33-53089-01, 2-86142-01, 33-31190-01 and
333-12401) of CKE Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated April
23, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CKE Restaurants, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended January 31, 2001, which report appears in
the January 31, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of CKE Restaurants, Inc. and
Subsidiaries.


                                                 /s/ KPMG LLP


Orange County, California
April 30, 2001
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 17 June 2009 – Korsch v OHIM (PharmaResearch)**

**(Case T-464/07)**

Community trade mark – Application for the Community word mark PharmaResearch – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) – Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods (Council Regulation
No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 30, 37, 42)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 October 2007 (Case R 924/2007-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign PharmaResearch as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Korsch AG |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark ‘PharmaResearch’ for goods and services in Class 9 – Application No 5309836 |
| Decision of the Examiner: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Korsch AG to pay the costs. |
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 CECILE FOY GSANGER

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

June 23, 2015

Hon. Jack Pulcher

105th District Court (Kleberg Co.)

P.O. Box 312

Kingsville, TX 78364

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00237-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 12-CRF-0137

Style: The State of Texas v. Isaac Sastaita

Enclosed please find a copy of an order issued by this Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. John T. Hubert (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Jaime E. Carrillo (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Jennifer Whittington (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Ms. Kimberly Grigg (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Vincent Gonzalez (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
# C_2011347EN.01003101.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/31

---

Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Secure Computing v OHIM — Investrónica (SECUREOS)

(Case T-277/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 347/50

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Secure Computing Corp. (Roseville, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: H. Kunz-Hallstein and R. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Investrónica, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: initially E. López Leiva, subsequently J.L. Zurdo Rivas, subsequently J.L. Zurdo Rivas and E. López Camba, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 April 2007 (Case R 1063/2006-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Investrónica, SA and Secure Computing Corp.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.

1

---
Mary E. Haire, Plaintiff, v. Barry Loren Kramer, M.D. and Iredell Memorial Hospital, Inc., Defendants.

No. COA16-140

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 6, 2016

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                 ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NACO Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  Quarter  Ended  August  31,  2003 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
J. Kirby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jeffrey J. Kirby
--------------------
Jeffrey J. Kirby
Chief Financial Officer
October 10, 2003


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 2002, as amended.
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 
 




 
 COMMON STOCK 
SIRVA®

COMMON STOCK 
NUMBER 
northAmerican. 
MOVING SERVICES 
ALLIED® 
SHARES 
CUSIP 
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
SPECIMEN 
IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF 
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.00 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF 
SIRVA

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney on surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate shall
not be valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 
Dated: 
CORPORATE SECRETARY 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC 
(Brooklyn, NY) 
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
BY 
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 
AMERICAN BANK NOTE COMPANY. 







 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Certificate, shall
be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

											
	TEN COM	 	—	 	as tenants in common	  	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —	 	                     Custodian
                    
	TEN ENT 	 	—	 	as tenants by the entireties	  		 	     (Cust)	  	                         (Minor)
	JT TEN 	 	—	 	as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	  		 	 under Uniform Gifts to Minors
 Act
                    

           (State)


 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For value received,
                                        
hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto 
  

	
	 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
  

	 

  
  

 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND
ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 
  
  

 
  

                          
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
               shares represented by the within Certificate, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

                          
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
     , attorney to transfer the said shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
  

			
	Dated	 	  


  

					
	 	  	 	 	  

	 	  	NOTICE:	 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.


 

			
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:	  	
		
	  
	  	
	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C.
RULE 17Ad-15.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of UAP Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the Thirty-Nine week period ended November 26, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David W. Bullock, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 4, 2007



|    |  |                             
|--- |  | ----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David W. Bullock        
|    |  | David W. Bullock            
|    |  | Executive Vice President and
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer     
|    |  | Principal Financial Officer
# C_2010161EN.01000301.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 April 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-246/07) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Breach of Articles 10 EC and 300(1) EC - Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants - Unilateral proposal by a Member State to list a substance in Annexe A to that convention)

(2010/C 161/03)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Valero Jordana and C. Tufvesson, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Kruse and A. Falk, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by C. Pilgaard Zinglersen and R. Holdgaard, acting as Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by C.M. Wissels and D.J.M. de Grave, acting as Agents), Republic of Finland (represented by J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by V. Jackson, acting as Agent, and by D. Anderson QC)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Articles 10 EC and 300(1) EC — Unilateral proposal to list a substance, perfluoroctane sulfonate, in Annex A to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by unilaterally proposing that a substance, perfluoroctane sulfonate, be listed in Annex A to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, the Kingdom of Sweden failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 10 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by unilaterally proposing that a substance, perfluoroctane sulfonate, be listed in Annex A to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, the Kingdom of Sweden failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 10 EC;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the European Commission’s costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the European Commission’s costs;

| 4. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 4.8.2007.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.1.4

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.

      RENAL CARE GROUP, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

      FIRST: That on March 11, 2004 the Board of Directors of the Corporation
approved a proposed amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be in the best
interests of the Corporation and its shareholders and directing that the
proposed amendment be submitted to the shareholders of the Corporation for their
consideration and approval at the next annual meeting of shareholders. The
proposal amended Section 4.1 of Article IV of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation by deleting such Section 4.1 in
its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

            "Section 4.1. Total Number of Shares of Stock. The total number of
      shares of stock of all classes that the Company shall have authority to
      issue is 160,000,000. The authorized capital stock is divided into
      10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share (the
      `Preferred Stock`), and 150,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value
      per share (the `Common Stock')."

      SECOND: That thereafter on June 9, 2004, the shareholders of the
Corporation approved the proposed amendment at the annual meeting of
shareholders.

      THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Renal Care Group, Inc. has caused this Certificate of
Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by
its duly authorized officer this 30th day of June, 2004

                                 RENAL CARE GROUP, INC.

                                 By:  /s/ Douglas B. Chappell
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                 Name: Douglas B. Chappell
                                 Title:  Senior Vice President and Secretary
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert William ASHWORTH

No. 308P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Mr. James Rainsford, Cyrus Quinn Griswold, Attorneys at Law, For Ashworth, Robert William.

Ms. Kathryn E. Hathcock, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of August 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 22nd of August 2016 for Writ of Supersedes of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of August 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."