United States Department of Labor 

Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

__________________________________________ 

K.R., Appellant 

and 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 

EISENHOWER VETERANS 

ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER, 

Leavenworth, KS, Employer 

__________________________________________ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 14-434 

Issued: October 7, 2014 

Appearances: Oral Argument June 19, 2014 

Appellant, pro se 

Ashkea Herron Mcallister, Esq., for the Director 

DECISION AND ORDER 

Before: 

COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge 

MICHAEL E. GROOM, Alternate Judge 

JAMES A. HAYNES, Alternate Judge 

JURISDICTION 

On December 11, 2013 appellant filed a timely appeal of a June 12, 2013 merit decision 

of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal 

Employees’ Compensation Act1

 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has 

jurisdiction over the merits of the case. 

ISSUES 

The issues are: (1) whether OWCP properly terminated appellant’s compensation 

effective August 4, 2011 on the grounds that she forfeited her entitlement to compensation for 

the period August 4, 2011 to March 10, 2012 pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a); (2) whether it 

properly found that she received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $20,843.93 

from August 4, 2011 to March 10, 2012 based on the forfeiture; and (3) whether OWCP properly 

 1

 5 U.S.C §§ 8101-8193. 
2

found that appellant was at fault in creating the $20,843.93 overpayment, thereby precluding 

waiver of recovery. 

On appeal, appellant contends that OWCP improperly determined that she forfeited her 

compensation benefits due to her guilty plea for theft of government property. She further 

contends that OWCP’s decision was based on a lie that she cashed her deceased brother’s OWCP 

compensation benefits checks and requested that they be forwarded to her address. Appellant 

asserts that she did not receive notification prior to the termination of her compensation benefits. 

She also asserts that she did not knowingly accept payments which she knew were incorrect. 

Appellant contends that repayment of the overpayment would cause her severe financial 

hardship. 

On appeal, the Director contends that the evidence establishes that appellant forfeited her 

entitlement to all compensation benefits arising from her employment injuries effective 

August 4, 2011 under 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a) due to her conviction for theft of U.S. government 

funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. It is contended that OWCP properly found that she 

received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $20,843.93 for the period of the 

forfeiture from August 4, 2011 to March 10, 2012 based on her August 4, 2011 conviction, 

thereby precluding waiver of recovery. The Director asserts that appellant was at fault in the 

creation of the overpayment because she knew or should have known that continued receipt of 

FECA compensation payments after her August 4, 2011 conviction was incorrect. He notes that 

FECA, its implementing regulations and OWCP’s procedure manual provide that a claimant who 

pleads guilty or is convicted of fraud in the application for or receipt of FECA benefits forfeits 

entitlement to benefits effective the date the plea is accepted or the date of conviction. The 

Director noted appellant’s contention that she was without fault because she was unaware that 

the guilty plea or conviction would terminate her benefits; but contends that ignorance of the law 

does not create an exception to the termination of entitlement to FECA benefits. 

FACTUAL HISTORY 

OWCP accepted that on March 18, 1992 appellant, then a 37-year-old chief of canteen 

services, sustained a closed bimalleolar fracture and post-traumatic arthritis of the right ankle 

when she slipped and fell in a parking lot at work. She stopped work on the date of injury and 

returned to work on April 1, 1992. Appellant continued to work until September 24, 1992. She 

has not returned to work. OWCP placed appellant on the periodic compensation rolls for total 

disability. 

On March 26, 2012 OWCP received an investigative memorandum dated March 21, 2012 

from the Office of the Inspector General of the employing establishment and the Department of 

Labor who conducted a joint investigation regarding whether appellant failed to report wages 

from her employment. The investigation did not substantiate allegations of her employment, but 

discovered that she was in receipt of her deceased brother’s wage-loss compensation checks 

under File No. xxxxxxx753. Appellant’s brother died on April 10, 2006 and left no eligible 

dependents. Following his death, appellant submitted a change of address request to OWCP 

under his claim and fraudulently had OWCP change the compensation check address to one she 

controlled. She received and negotiated 14 U.S. Department of Treasury checks issued in her 

brother’s name, totaling $27,073.17. On January 26, 2011 a federal grand jury in the 
3

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, returned a one-count 

indictment charging appellant with a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 641, Theft of Public Money. 

Appellant was charged for receipt and negotiating her deceased brother’s OWCP wage-loss 

compensation checks. On July 20, 2011 a plea agreement was filed in the U.S. District Court for 

the Northern District of Texas. On August 4, 2011 appellant entered a plea of guilty in open 

court to one count in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 641, Theft of Public Money. On 

November 3, 2011 she was sentenced to serve three years of probation and directed to pay 

restitution to OWCP in the amount of $27,073.17. The special agent-in charge who prepared the 

investigative memorandum requested that OWCP consider terminating appellant’s compensation 

under 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a) effective the date of her conviction and issue an overpayment for all 

benefits paid to her after August 4, 2011. 

The indictment for one count of Theft of Government Property under Title 18 U.S.C. 

§ 641 stated: 

“On or about April 2006, through on or about April 2007, in the Dallas Division 

of the Northern District of Texas, [appellant], did knowingly and with the intent 

to deprive the owner of the use and benefit of the money, embezzle, steal and 

convert money belonging to the Department of Labor, a department or agency of 

the United States of America, namely [OWCP] benefit payments made to the 

defendant’s brother, ..., to which she knew she was not entitled, having a value of 

approximately $27,000.00.” 

The plea agreement signed by appellant on July 14, 2011 stated that she understood the 

nature and elements of the offense alleged in the one-count indictment in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 641, Theft of Government Property, to which she pled guilty and agreed that “the factual 

resume” she signed was true. 

A sentencing order of the U.S. District Court, dated November 3, 2011, placed appellant 

on probation for three years and ordered her to pay restitution in the amount of $27,073.17.2

 

In an August 15, 2012 decision, OWCP found that appellant forfeited her right to further 

compensation because she pled guilty to fraud in the receipt of her deceased brother’s FECA 

compensation benefits in the amount of $27,073.71 under File No. xxxxxx753 from March 19, 

2006 through April 14, 2007. It terminated compensation effective March 11, 2012. 

On August 31, 2012 OWCP made a preliminary determination that appellant received an 

overpayment of compensation in the amount of $27,073.71 from March 19, 2006 to April 14, 

2007 because she fraudulently accepted her deceased brother’s compensation payments. It found 

that she was at fault in creating the overpayment because she accepted payments that she knew 

or reasonably should have known to be incorrect. OWCP notified appellant to complete an 

enclosed Form OWCP-20 and submit supporting financial documents. It notified her that, within 

30 days of the date of the letter she could request a telephone conference, a final decision based 

on the written evidence or a prerecoupment hearing. 

 2

 On September 27, 2012 OWCP received appellant’s court-ordered restitution in the amount of $27,073.17 under 

File No. xxxxxx753. 
4

On September 10, 2012 appellant requested an oral hearing before an OWCP hearing 

representative regarding the August 15, 2012 forfeiture decision and August 31, 2012 

preliminary overpayment determination. She contended that the overpayment occurred through 

no fault of her own and requested waiver of recovery of the overpayment. In a September 30, 

2012 statement, appellant contended that the investigation was filled with incorrect information 

and misleading statements. She alleged that she never submitted a change of address to OWCP 

to have her brother’s checks directed to her and she never contacted OWCP about his checks. 

Appellant stated that there were a number of people receiving mail at the forwarding address 

which was a post office box. She claimed that she never committed fraud or negotiated the 

checks. Appellant deposited them into her brother’s bank account of which she was a joint 

owner. After his death, she called the employing establishment asking what to do with the 

checks, but no one called her back. Appellant used some of the money to settle her brother’s 

estate. In a partially completed OWCP-20 form, she stated that she no longer had any of the 

incorrectly paid checks. Appellant reported monthly income of $200.00 in food stamps and 

assets of $2,015.00. She stated that she had no income and was unable to pay any household 

expenses. 

In a January 7, 2013 decision, OWCP found that appellant forfeited her right to further 

compensation under FECA because she had pled guilty to one count of fraud under Title 18 

U.S.C. 641, Theft of Government Property, in receipt of benefits under FECA. It terminated her 

compensation effective March 11, 2012. 

In a letter dated January 7, 2013, OWCP made a preliminary determination that appellant 

received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $20,843.93 from August 4, 2011 to 

March 10, 2012 because she was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 641 when she fraudulently 

accepted her deceased brother’s FECA compensation under File No. xxxxxx753. It found that 

she was at fault in creating the overpayment because she accepted a payment that she knew or 

reasonably should have known was incorrect. OWCP requested that appellant complete an 

enclosed Form OWCP-20 and submit supporting financial documents. It notified her that, within 

30 days of the date of the letter she could request a telephone conference, a final decision based 

on the written evidence or a prerecoupment hearing. A compensation payment history listed 

gross compensation paid from August 4, 2011 to March 10, 2012 pursuant to appellant’s claim 

under File No. xxxxxx094. 

By letter dated January 23, 2013, appellant requested an appeal of OWCP’s January 7, 

2013 decision. 

In a February 6, 2013 decision, an OWCP hearing representative vacated the August 15, 

2012 forfeiture and termination decision because it was not prepared for a District Director’s 

required signature. She reversed the August 31, 2012 preliminary overpayment determination, 

finding that $27,073.71 overpayment was based on the overpaid compensation of appellant’s 

deceased brother under File No. xxxxxx753 and that only her own compensation benefits under 

File No. xxxxxx094 could be declared forfeited. The hearing representative noted that appellant 

had already paid the court-ordered restitution of $27,073.17 in her brother’s case. 

In a February 8, 2013 decision, OWCP finalized the overpayment of compensation in the 

amount of $20,843.93 from August 4, 2011 to March 10, 2012, because appellant pled guilty to 
5

fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 641. It found that she was at fault in creating the overpayment and 

directed recovery of the overpayment in full. 

By decision dated March 4, 2013, OWCP vacated the February 8, 2013 decision. It 

found that appellant had filed a timely request for a prerecoupment hearing regarding the 

January 7, 2013 decisions. 

During an April 25, 2013 hearing, appellant disagreed with the overpayment 

determination. She testified that she continued to be totally disabled and she did not have 

anything to do with being overpaid. Appellant provided her monthly income and expenses and 

contended that she would suffer severe financial hardship in repaying the overpayment. She 

contended that she did not steal the money and was not a criminal. Appellant testified that when 

her brother died she contacted “them” and was told that they would get back to her. She 

contended that it was not her fault that his checks were not stopped. Appellant also contended 

that she did not create a change of address. She kept the money and tried to give it back. 

Appellant testified that she did not understand her guilty plea. She was advised by her lawyer to 

sign the plea agreement to avoid going to jail. 

In a June 12, 2013 decision, an OWCP hearing representative affirmed the January 7, 

2013 forfeiture decision. She found that appellant forfeited her entitlement to compensation 

effective August 4, 2011, the date her guilty plea for fraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 641 was 

accepted by the court. The hearing representative finalized the overpayment determination. She 

found that appellant received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $20,843.93 

based on the forfeiture. The hearing representative further found that, based on the plea 

agreement, appellant failed to provide information which she knew or should have known to be 

material, that she failed to notify OWCP about her brother’s death and accepted his 

compensation payments, which she knew or should have known were incorrect; thus, she was 

not without fault. She directed recovery of the overpayment in full. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 1 

Public Law No. 103-333, enacted on September 30, 1994, amended FECA by adding 5 

U.S.C. § 8148, which provides for forfeiture of compensation benefits by an individual convicted 

of fraud with respect to receipt of compensation pursuant to a felony conviction. Section 8148(a) 

specifically states that any individual convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1920 or any other 

federal or state criminal statute relating to fraud in the application for or receipt of any benefit 

under FECA, shall forfeit, as of the date of such conviction, any entitlement to any benefit to 

which such individual would otherwise be entitled under FECA for any injury occurring on or 

before the date of such conviction. Such forfeiture shall be in addition to any action the 

Secretary may take under section 81063

 (forfeiture) or section 81294 (recovery of overpayments) 

of FECA.5

 3

 5 U.S.C. § 8106. 

4 Id. at § 8129. 

5 Id. at § 8148(a); see F.C., 59 ECAB 666 (2007). 
6

Section 10.17 of OWCP’s implementing regulations provide that when a claimant pleads 

guilty to federal or state criminal charges of fraud in connection with receipt of Federal 

Government benefits, the claimant’s entitlement to further compensation benefits will terminate 

effective the date the guilty plea is accepted. Termination of entitlement under this section is not 

affected by any subsequent change in or recurrence of the beneficiary’s medical condition.6

OWCP’s procedure manual states that in support of termination or suspension of 

compensation the record must contain copies of the indictment or information, the plea 

agreement, if any, the document containing the guilty verdict and/or the court’s docket sheet. 

Further, this evidence must establish that the individual was convicted and the conviction is 

related to the claim for or receipt of compensation benefits under FECA.7 The termination is 

effective on the date of the verdict or on the date the guilty plea is accepted and guilt 

adjudicated.8

 Because of the criminal basis for the termination, no pretermination notice is 

required before a final decision is issued.9

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 1 

The Board finds that OWCP properly terminated appellant’s compensation benefits on 

the grounds that she was convicted in federal court on one count of theft of public money related 

to her receipt of benefits under FECA. On August 4, 2011 appellant pled guilty in the U.S. 

District Court for the Northern District of Texas to one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 641 when 

she knowingly and intentionally converted FECA benefit payments that were made to her 

deceased brother. Under section 8148(a) of FECA, a claimant who is convicted of fraud in 

obtaining compensation benefits under 18 U.S.C. § 1920 or any other federal or state criminal 

statute relating to fraud in the application for or receipt of any benefit under FECA is 

permanently barred from receiving any compensation under FECA.10 The record contains copies 

of the indictment, the plea agreement and court judgment. The Board finds that this evidence 

establishes that appellant was convicted of fraud in obtaining FECA compensation benefits.11 

OWCP procedures provide that the termination is effective on the date the guilty plea is made in 

open court.12 The Board finds that OWCP properly terminated appellant’s compensation 

benefits that day, August 4, 2011.13

 6

 20 C.F.R. § 10.17. 

7

 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, Disallowances, Chapter 2.1400.17c(2) (February 2013). 

8 Id. at Chapter 2.1400.17(d) (February 2013). 

9 Id. at Chapter 2.1400.4(a)(6) (February 2013). 

10 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a). 

11 See supra note 7. 

12 See supra note 8. 

13 See John L. Hoss, Jr., 54 ECAB 239 (2002); Bob R. Gilley, 51 ECAB 377 (2000). 
7

On appeal, appellant contended that OWCP improperly determined that she forfeited her 

compensation benefits based on her guilty plea for theft of her brothers FECA benefits.14 Her 

conviction for theft, in this instance under 18 U.S.C. § 641, acts as a forfeiture of her right to 

FECA compensation.15 

Appellant further contends on appeal that she did not receive a pretermination notice. 

The Board finds that a pretermination notice is not required when the basis of the termination is 

criminal.16 As appellant was convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, OWCP properly 

terminated her compensation benefits under the forfeiture provision without pretermination 

notice. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 2 

Section 8148 of FECA states that any individual convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 1920 or any other federal or state criminal statute relating to fraud in the application for or 

receipt of any benefit under FECA, shall forfeit, as of the date of such conviction, any 

entitlement to any benefit such individual would otherwise be entitled to under FECA for any 

injury occurring on or before the date of such conviction. Such forfeiture shall be in addition to 

any action the Secretary may take under section 810617 (forfeiture) or section 812918 (recovery of 

overpayments) of FECA.19

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 2 

On August 4, 2011 appellant pled guilty to one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 641, a 

federal criminal statute, when she knowingly and intentionally converted her deceased brother’s 

FECA compensation benefits. As stated, under section 8148(a) of FECA any individual 

convicted of 18 U.S.C. § 1920 or any other federal or state criminal statute relating to fraud in 

the application for or receipt of benefits under FECA will have her compensation forfeited, as of 

the date of such conviction.20 Because appellant pled guilty to violating a federal criminal statue, 

she forfeited any compensation as of August 4, 2011, the date of her conviction. 

The record reveals that appellant received wage-loss benefits from August 4, 2011 to 

March 10, 2012 under her own claim assigned File No. xxxxxx094 after her conviction on 

 14 Congress has enacted 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a) as an absolute forfeiture of compensation, without any provision for 

waiver of the effects of this section of FECA. Michael D. Matthews, 51 ECAB 247 (1999). This forfeiture is a 

permanent forfeiture which bars appellant from any further entitlement to compensation for any employment-related 

injuries or conditions. Jeff M. Burns, 51 ECAB 241 (1999). 

15 Danny E. Haley, 56 ECAB 393 (2005). 

16 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, supra note 7 at Chapter 2.1400.4(a)(6) (2013). 

17 See supra note 3. 

18 5 U.S.C. § 8129. 

19 See supra note 5. 

20 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a).
8

August 4, 2011 for theft under 18 U.S.C. § 641. OWCP determined that during the stated period 

she received gross compensation in the amount of $20,843.93. The record contains 

documentation of OWCP’s calculations and there is no contrary evidence. In Alan L. Trindle, 

Sr.,

21 the Board found that gross compensation represented the amount of overpayment from 

forfeiture of compensation. OWCP explained the basis of the overpayment and appellant does 

not dispute that she received compensation payments from August 4, 2011 to March 10, 2012 

following her fraud conviction. The Board finds that she received an overpayment of 

compensation in the amount of $20,843.93. 

LEGAL PRECEDENT -- ISSUE 3 

Section 8129(a) of FECA provides that, when an overpayment of compensation has been 

made because of an error of fact or law, adjustment shall be made by decreasing later payments 

to which an individual is entitled. The only exception to this requirement is when an incorrect 

payment has been made to an individual who is without fault and when adjustment or recovery 

would defeat the purpose of FECA or be against equity and good conscience.22 No waiver of 

payment is possible if appellant is with fault in helping to create the overpayment.23

Section 10.433(a) of OWCP’s implementing regulations provide that an individual is 

with fault in the creation of an overpayment who: (1) made an incorrect statement as to a 

material fact which the individual knew or should have known to be incorrect; (2) failed to 

furnish information which the individual knew or should have known to be material; or (3) with 

respect to the overpaid individual only, accepted a payment which the individual knew or should 

have been expected to know was incorrect.24

ANALYSIS -- ISSUE 3 

OWCP applied the second and third standards to determine that appellant was at fault in 

creating the overpayment. The Board finds that the record establishes that she knew or should 

have known that she accepted incorrect compensation payments under her deceased brother’s 

FECA claim. 

When appellant pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 641, she admitted that she knowingly 

and intentionally converted FECA compensation benefits payable to her brother “which she 

knew she was not entitled.” The plea agreement noted that she agreed to “the factual resume” of 

her case. This plea of guilt is sufficient to establish that appellant knew that she had accepted 

incorrect payments under her brother’s claim. As noted by the Director, following her plea, she 

knew or should have known her continued receipt of FECA benefits after her August 4, 2011 

conviction was incorrect. Even if the overpayment resulted from negligence on the part of 

OWCP in continuing to issue appellant wage-loss checks after she was convicted of stealing her 

 21 53 ECAB 487 (2002). 

22 5 U.S.C. § 8129(b). 

23 Robert W. O Brien, 36 ECAB 541, 547 (1985). 

24 20 C.F.R. § 10.433(a); Kenneth E. Rush, 51 ECAB 116, 118 (1999). 
9

deceased brother’s FECA benefits, this did not excuse her from accepting continued payments 

which she knew or should have known to be incorrect.25 As appellant accepted compensation 

benefits from OWCP, which covered the period August 4, 2011 to March 10, 2012, the Board 

finds that she was at fault in creating the $20,843.93 overpayment for this period and is not 

entitled to waiver.26

On appeal, appellant argued that she was not at fault in the creation of the $20,843.93 

overpayment because she did not cash her deceased brother’s FECA compensation checks, did 

not request that his checks be forwarded to her address or knowingly accept payments which she 

knew to be incorrect. As noted, she pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 641 as a result of 

knowingly and intentionally converting her deceased brother’s FECA benefits that she knew she 

was not entitled to receive. The Board finds that appellant’s contentions are without merit. 

Appellant further contended on appeal that repayment of the overpayment would cause 

her severe financial hardship. The Board’s jurisdiction is limited to reviewing those cases where 

OWCP seeks recovery from continuing compensation under FECA.27 As appellant was not in 

receipt of continuing compensation, at the time the final decision was entered in this matter, the 

Board lacks jurisdiction to review recovery of the overpayment. 

CONCLUSION 

The Board finds that OWCP properly terminated appellant’s compensation effective 

August 4, 2011 on the grounds that she forfeited her entitlement to compensation for the period 

August 4, 2011 to March 10, 2012 pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8148(a). The Board further finds that 

OWCP properly found that she received an overpayment of compensation in the amount of 

$20,843.93 based on the forfeiture. The Board also finds that OWCP properly found that 

appellant was at fault in creating the $20,843.93 overpayment, thereby precluding waiver of 

recovery of the overpayment. 

 25 Diana L. Booth, 52 ECAB 370 (2001). 

26 Bob G. Gilley, supra note 13. 

27 Judith A. Cardio, 55 ECAB 348, 353 (2004). 
10

ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the June 12, 2013 decision of the Office of 

Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed. 

Issued: October 7, 2014 

Washington, DC 

 

 Colleen Duffy Kiko, Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 Michael E. Groom, Alternate Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board 

 

 James A. Haynes, Alternate Judge 

 Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board