alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3856 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3856

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 2-year 
   extension of the exclusion from gross income for the discharge of 
  qualified principal residence indebtedness, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2014

  Mr. Foster introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 2-year 
   extension of the exclusion from gross income for the discharge of 
  qualified principal residence indebtedness, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeowners Debt Relief Extension Act 
of 2014''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF DISCHARGE OF 
              QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 108(a)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``January 1, 
2014'' and inserting ``January 1, 2016''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to indebtedness discharged after December 31, 2013.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON SECTION 199 DEDUCTION ATTRIBUTABLE TO OIL, 
              NATURAL GAS, OR PRIMARY PRODUCTS THEREOF.

    (a) Denial of Deduction.--Paragraph (4) of section 199(c) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(E) Special rule for certain oil and gas 
                income.--In the case of any taxpayer who is a major 
                integrated oil company (as defined in section 
                167(h)(5)(B)) for the taxable year, the term `domestic 
                production gross receipts' shall not include gross 
                receipts from the production, transportation, or 
                distribution of oil, natural gas, or any primary 
                product (within the meaning of subsection (d)(9)) 
                thereof.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2013.

SEC. 4. DEBT REDUCTION.

    The net amount of any savings realized as a result of the enactment 
of this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall be deposited in 
the Treasury of the United States and used only to redeem outstanding 
Federal debt.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
          connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Vanguard Minerals Corporation
          (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2007, as
          filed
          with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"), I, Vladimir
          Fedyunin
          , President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
          to 18
          U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
          of 2002,
          that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
  2.
              To
                  my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                  of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
                  Report.
 
  /s/
        Vladimir
        Fedyunin
 Vladimir
        Fedyunin
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Duly
        Authorized Officer and Principal
 Financial
        and Accounting Officer
 
 Date:January
        10,
        2008
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GigaBeam
      Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”),
      the undersigned as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby, certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of
                1934:and




(ii)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Louis S. Slaughter


Name:
      Louis S. Slaughter


Chief
      Executive Officer


Date: May
      21, 2007
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-5491
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DWAYNE EDDIE JUSTUS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-94-V) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 29, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randolph Marshall Lee, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, H. Thomas C hurch, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dwayne Eddie Justus pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute marijuana, 21 U.S.C.A. § 846 (West Supp. 1995). He appeals his sentence of 87 months, contending that the district court clearly erred in finding that he had not accepted responsibility for his offense. United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual , § 3E1.1 (Nov. 1994). We affirm. Justus was arrested while co-defendants Donald and Mandy Griffin were delivering 100 pounds of marijuana to him. In his first statement to investigators, Justus said he had bought about 700 pounds of marijuana from the Griffins between 1991 and 1994. This statement agreed with information from the Griffins that they had been involved with about 800 pounds of marijuana since 1991 andhad sold the majority of it to Justus. However, in a later statement, Justus admitted to buying only 240 pounds of marijuana. His last estimate was a mere 108 pounds, 70 pounds of which he said he was holding for Griffin. The adjustment for acceptance of responsibility may be denied to a defendant who falsely denies or frivolously contests relevant conduct which the district court determines to be t rue. USSG § 3E1.1, comment. (n.1(a)). We find that the district court did not clearly err in denying the reduction to Justus on this basis. The sentence imposed by the district court is therefore affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and3 legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,289,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,053,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,520
<INVENTORY>                                  2,617,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,378,460
<PP&E>                                       1,633,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                 932,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,136,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          537,563
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,100
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,397,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,136,947
<SALES>                                      2,254,722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,254,722
<CGS>                                        1,238,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,297,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,245,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,245,184)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,245,184)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.39)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Directors of
Fina Raffinaderij Antwerpen N.V.:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of PetroFina S.A. on Form F-3 (File No. 333-49315) of our report dated March 22,
1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of PetroFina S.A. for the year
ended December 31, 1999, relating to the balance sheet of Fina Raffinaderij
Antwerpen N.V. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related statements of
income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the two years ended December 31, 1998.

Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler Reviseurs d'Entreprises
Represented by:

/s/  L. RUYSEN
---------------------------------------------------------
L. Ruysen

July 3, 2000

                                       E-5
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 *Title:*
                     Grants for Battered Women's Shelters. *OMB No.:*
                     New collection. *Description:*
                     This information collection is authorized under Title III of the Child Abuse Amendments of 1984, Public Law 98-457, as amended. In response to the program announcement, the respondents must submit information about their services program and their eligibility. Information that is collected is used to  award grants under the Grants for Battered Women's Shelters program. *Respondents:*
                     State agencies administering the Family Violence Prevention and Services program. Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of respondents
Number of 
                             responses per respondent
Average 
                             burden hours per response
Total burden hoursState FVPSA Agencies
53
1
6
318Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours



318
 *Additional Information:*
                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families,  Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: 
                    *grjohnson@acf.hhs.gov.* *OMB Comment:*
                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Attn: Desk Officer for ACF, E-mail address: 
                    *Katherine_T._Astrich@omb.eop.gov.* Dated: January 26, 2005. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 05-1895  Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134330 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 134330 

 COA: 267189 

Wayne CC: 04-005074-01

DARRYL GENE ORR,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of January 30, 2008, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Taylor (Docket No. 134206). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

July 11, 2008, 481 Mich 943 (2008), the application is again considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed 

by this Court. 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

###### Audit and Financial Management Advisory (AFMAC) 

                    The U.S. Small Business Administration's Audit and Financial                           ( print page 55656)                        Management Advisory Committee (AFMAC) will host a public meeting on Friday, September 23, 2005. The meeting will be take place at the U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Office of Chief Financial Officer Conference Room, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20416. The AFMAC was established by the Administrator of the SBA to provide recommendation and advice regarding the Agency's financial management including the financial reporting process, systems of internal controls, audit process and process for monitoring compliance with relevant laws and regulations.                 

                    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Thomas Dumaresq in writing or by fax. Thomas Dumaresq, Chief Financial Officer , 409 3rd Street SW., Washington DC 20416, phone (202) 205-6506, fax: (202) 205-6869, e-mail:                     *thomas.dumaresq@sba.gov.*

Matthew K. Becker,

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-18889 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2010024EN.01007302.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/73

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 September 2009 — Vinci v European Central Bank

(Case F-130/07) (1)

1

(Staff case - Staff of the ECB - Allegedly unlawful treatment of medical data - Medical visit imposed)

2010/C 24/134

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vinci (Schöneck, Germany) (represented by: B. Karthaus, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. Malfrère and F. Feyerbacher, Agents, assisted by H.-G. Kamann)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for a declaration that the registration of documents containing medical data is unlawful and for annulment of the decision of the ECB refusing, firstly, to erase the personal data derived from those documents, and secondly, ordering the applicant to have a medical examination, and an application for compensation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 8, 12.1.2008, p. 32.

1

---
Lawrence Piazza and Salvatore Lampuri v. David Kirkbride, Gregory Brannon, and Robert Rice

No. 181A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Steven B. Epstein, Attorney at Law, Andrew H. Erteschik, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Piazza, Lawrence.

Mark A. Finkelstein, Attorney at Law, Matthew N. Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Michael Lee Frazier, Attorney at Law, for Brannon, Gregory.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant (Gregory Brannon) on the 10th of May 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND
AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000919602
<NAME> HELSINKI CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          721
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,967)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  65
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (65)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (65)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (65)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Gregory COOPER.

No. COA15-872.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 16, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jaquareus Thomez HOLDEN, Defendant.

No. COA15-460.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 10, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Error.
Jon Smart, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

June 7, 2016

**583ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on May 26, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable D. Craig Brown be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Brown shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, **584and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Brown shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of FenturaFinancial, Inc. on Form S-3D (File No.333-120182) on Form S-8 (File No. 333-118085), on Form S-8(File No. 333-137104) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-137103) of our report dated March 7, 2008, which report is included inthe 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Fentura Financial, Inc./s/ CROWE CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLCGrand Rapids, Michigan