alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Rahmil INGRAM

No. 367P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Mr. James R. Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Ingram, Rahmil.

*694Mr. Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of October 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th of October 2016 for Writ of Supersedes of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of October 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 05-54746) published on page 54746 of the issue for Friday, September 16, 2005.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago heading, the entry for Capitol Bancorp, Ltd., Lansing, Michigan, is revised to read as follows:

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Patrick M. Wilder, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

*1. Capitol Bancorp, Ltd.*, Lansing, Michigan, and Capitol Development Bancorp, Limited I, Lansing, Michigan; to acquire 51 percent of the voting shares of Bank of Belleville, Belleville, Illinois (in organization).                

Comments on this application must be received by October 13, 2005.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 05-19031 Filed 9-22-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **Certification
        of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the**
 **Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GigaBeam
        Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”),
        the undersigned as Principal Executive Officer of the
        Company, hereby, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (i)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934:and
  (ii)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 /s/
        Louis S. Slaughter
 Name:
        Louis S. Slaughter
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Date: August
        17, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of UAP Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen week period ended May 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, L. Kenneth Cordell, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 6, 2006



|    |  |                                                                  
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ L. Kenneth Cordell                                           
|    |  | L. Kenneth Cordell                                               
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer Principal Executive Officer
---

---

EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION

|I, Philippe Szwarc, certify that:
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 

---

---

| |  | b) | Any fraud,
  whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
  a significant role in the companys internal control over financial
  reporting.
| |  | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|June 24,
  2004
|---------------
|               
|               
|               
|               
|               
|               

---

---
In the Matter of the Appeal of: Michelin North America, Inc.

No. 171P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Alexander P. Sands, III, Attorney at Law, David S. Pokela, Attorney at Law, for Michelin North America, Inc.

Ronald L. Gibson, Attorney at Law, for Mecklenburg County.

Kenneth R. Murphy, III, Attorney at Law, Allison Pope Cooper, Attorney at Law, for Wake County.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of May 2016 by Mecklenburg County in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
ROBIN E. CHISHOLM



CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON





To:

US Securities and Exchange Commission



I, Robin E. Chisholm do hereby consent to (i) the incorporation by reference of the following document(s) into the annual information form (the AIF) of Nevsun Resources Ltd. (the Issuer) dated March 24, 2005 to be filed with certain Canadian securities commissions and the annual report on Form 40-F (the 40-F) of the Issuer to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection therewith, and (ii) the inclusion of any extracts from or summary of such document(s) in the AIF and the 40-F:

1.

Exploration and Drilling Program on the Bisha Property and dated February, 2004, as amended April, 2004 (the Technical Report)

(collectively, the Technical Report)

I also certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical Report or that the written disclosure in the AIF or the 40-F of the Issuer contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in the Technical Report.

Dated this 17 day of March, 2005.

signed

_______________________
 Robin E. Chisholm

[Seal or Stamp]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Forms S-8) pertaining to Jayhawk Acceptance Corporation's Amended and Restated 
1994 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, Jayhawk Acceptance Corporation's 
Amended and Restated Non-Employee Stock Option Plan and Jayhawk Acceptance 
Corporation's Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated April 17, 1997, 
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Jayhawk Acceptance 
Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A-1) for the year ended 
December 31, 1996.

    
                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP     
                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 17, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 183 (Thursday, September 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18969]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Change in State of 
Incorporation--The Buckeye Union Insurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 1 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 2005 Revision, published July 1, 2005, at 70 FR 38502.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Buckeye Union Insurance Company has 
redomesticated from the State of Ohio to the State of Illinois 
effective January 1, 2005. The Company was last listed as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds at 70 FR 38510, July 1, 2005.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 2005 revision, on page 38510 to 
reflect this change.
    The Circular may be reviewed and downloaded through the Internet 
(http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/index.html) or through our computerized 
public bulletin board system (FMS Inside Line) at (202) 874-6887. A 
hard copy may be purchased from the Government Printing Office (GPO), 
Subscription Service, Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When 
ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 769-
004-05219-0.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: September 9, 2005.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 05-18969 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-1

CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
                                                                   -------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands)                                               2004         2003         2002         2001         2000
                                                                   ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------

<S>                                                                <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
EARNINGS BEFORE FIXED CHARGE:
      Income (loss) before income taxes, discontinued
        operations and cumulative effect of accounting change
        for goodwill                                               $ (43,927)   $  17,878    $ (84,540)   $(205,264)   $ (47,460)
      Fixed Charges                                                   70,318       69,363       81,375      103,719       92,389
                                                                   ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                                                   $  26,391    $  87,241    $  (3,165)   $(101,545)   $  44,929
                                                                   =========    =========    =========    =========    =========



FIXED CHARGES:
      Interest expense                                             $  39,991    $  39,954    $  53,937    $  70,541    $  63,283
      Interest component of rent expensed (1)                         30,327       29,409       27,438       33,178       29,106
                                                                   ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                                                   $  70,318    $  69,363    $  81,375    $ 103,719    $  92,389
                                                                   =========    =========    =========    =========    =========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (2)                                    --          1.3           --           --           --
                                                                   =========    =========    =========    =========    =========

</TABLE>




(1)  Calculated as one-third of total rent expense.

(2)  Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges for the years ended
     January 31, 2004, 2002, 2001 and 2000 by $43,927, $84,540, $205,264 and
     $47,460, respectively.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 22 April 2008 – Casa Editorial El Tiempo v OHIM – Instituto Nacional
de Meteorología (EL TIEMPO)**

**(Case T-233/06)**

Community trade mark – Opposition – Application for Community word mark EL TIEMPO – Earlier national word marks TELETIEMPO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 49-50, 52, 57)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 June 2006 (Case R 760/2005-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Instituto Nacional de Meteorología and Casa Editoria El Tiempo, SA. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Casa Editorial El Tiempo, SA |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark EL TIEMPO for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 38 and 41 – Application No 1685056 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Instituto Nacional de Meteorología |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | National word marks EL TIEMPO for the publications (not registered but well known), TELETIEMPO for goods in Class 16 (No 1902923) and for services in Class 38 (No 2217494), and TELETIEMPO INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE METEOROLOGÍA for goods in Classes 35 (No 2217493) and 41 (No 2217492) |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld; registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Opposition dismissed for services in Classes 35 and 41 |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Casa Editorial El Tiempo to pay the costs. |
# C_2008128EN.01003203.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/32

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 April 2008 — Nordmilch v OHIM (Vitality)

(Case T-294/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark Vitality - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 128/70)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Nordmilch eG (Zeven, Germany) (represented by: R. Schneider, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 August 2006 (Case R 746/2004-4) concerning the registration of the word sign Vitality as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Nordmilch eG is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Nordmilch eG is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 310, 16.12.2006.

1

---
Order entered December 20, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00907
- CV
TOMER DAMTI , Appellant

V. ACET GLOBAL, LLC , Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicia l District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 04365

O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s December 17, 2021 unopposed first motion
for an extension of time to file its brief

. Appellee seeks an eleven

- day extension.
We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 7, 2022.
/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
**Exhibit 31.1****UNIVERSAL BIOSENSORS, INC.****CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Mark Morrison, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of Universal Biosensors, Inc.,certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Universal Biosensors, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under oursupervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating tothe registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during theperiod in which this report isbeing prepared;  b)  Not applicable   c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;and  d)  Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reportingthat occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)  All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controlover financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize andreport financial information; and   b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or otheremployees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date:November 14, 2007         /s/ Mark Morrisson     Mark Morrisson  Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director Universal Biosensors, Inc.
STATE of North Carolina v. Sequon Ahmad WRIGHT.

No. COA15-1218.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 21, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Plain Error.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3916 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to promote the expansion of 

spectrum-based services to exceptionally hard-to-serve populations in 

unserved and underserved geographic locations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2014 

Mr. KILMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to promote the 

expansion of spectrum-based services to exceptionally 

hard-to-serve populations in unserved and underserved 

geographic locations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Rural 

5 Broadband Act of 2014’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3916 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROMOTION OF SPECTRUM-BASED SERVICES IN 

2 UNSERVED AND UNDERSERVED LOCATIONS. 

3 Section 309(j)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934 

4 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(4)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

6 the end; 

7 (2) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period 

8 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(G) promote the expansion of spectrum11 based services to exceptionally hard-to-serve 

12 populations in unserved and underserved geo13 graphic locations.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS