alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004070EN.01019502.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/195 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/195

---

(2004/C 70 E/209)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3301/03

by Nicole Thomas-Mauro (UEN) to the Commission

(7 November 2003)

Subject:   Info-points Europe

Subject:

A message has recently been sent to the various Info-points Europe informing them that they were to lose European subsidies.

The Info-points Europe were set up to enable members of the public to obtain information about Europe.

The withdrawal of subsidies manifestly conflicts with the new information strategy adopted in 2002. The Commission seems to take the view that the entry into force of the new Financial Regulation on 1 January 2003 is a sufficient condition for this withdrawal.

What financial support systems does the Commission propose to introduce?

Are any other measures planned to enable these bodies to operate?

---
SCPW-23-0000061

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________

DONALD B. MARKS , Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE TRISH K. MORIKAWA, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai ʻ i, Respondent Judge,

and

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, Respondent.

________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ( CASE NO. 1CPN-21-0000002 )

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION (By: Recktenwald , C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ

. , Circuit Judg e Crabtree and Circuit Judge Kawashima , assigned by reason of vacanc ies )

Upon consideration of the renewed petition filed on October

24, 2023, the answer filed on December 7, 2023, and the record,

the Respondent Judge filed findings of fact, conclusions of law,

and an order denying Petitioner’s Hawai ʻ i Rules of Penal

Procedure Rule 40 petition without a hearing. Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-23-0000061 13-DEC-2023 08:11 AM Dkt. 16 ODDP2 I t is ordered that the renewed petition is dismissed as

moot.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, December 13 , 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Jeffrey P. Crabtree

/s/ James S. Kawashima
# C_2008037EN.01000801.xml

| 9.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/8

---

Action brought on 22 November 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-516/07)

(2008/C 37/09)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S.Pardo Quintillán, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to identify all the competent authorities for the application of the rules of Directive 2000/60/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(2) and (7) of the directive; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to identify all the competent authorities for the application of the rules of Directive 2000/60/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(2) and (7) of the directive; and

1

| — | by failing to communicate to the Commission the list of all the competent authorities, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(8) of Directive 2000/60/EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

by failing to communicate to the Commission the list of all the competent authorities, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(8) of Directive 2000/60/EC;

| — | order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission's application is based on Article 3 of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.

According to Article 3(2) and (7) and (8), the Member States are required to identify the competent authorities for the application of the rules of Directive 2000/60/EC and to communicate the list of competent authorities to the Commission within a prescribed period.

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 327, p. 1.

1

---
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     WHEREAS,  Mid-Continent  Federal  Savings  Bank (the "Bank") and Richard T.
Pottorff (the "Employee")  previously entered into an Employment  Agreement (the
"Agreement") dated March 21, 1995, and

     WHEREAS,  Section 14 of this  Agreement  provides  that  amendments to this
Agreement may be made in writing and signed by both parties,

     NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agreement be amended by adoption and
execution of this Amendment to the Agreement as follows.

      1.  Revision to Section 4 of the  Agreement by inclusion of the  following
          phrase at the end of Section 5 as follows:

          "Notwithstanding  anything herein to the contrary, the expiration date
          of the term of this Agreement shall be as of June 27, 1998,  except as
          may be extend  beyond that date by future  action of the Board  within
          its sole discretion in accordance with this Agreement."


     As Secretary to the Bank, I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was
adopted and  ratified by a majority  vote of a meeting of the Board of Directors
of the Bank, held on June 27, 1996, a quorum being present.


                                    /s/Cheryl Wilkerson                 
                                    Cheryl Wilkerson, Secretary

SEAL

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties to the Agreement dated March 21, 1995, do
hereby execute this Amendment to the Agreement on this 27 th day of June 1996.


                                          Mid-Continent Federal Savings Bank

                                    By:   /s/Ken Dellett           
                                          -------------------------     
                                          Kenneth B. Dellett



                                          /s/Richard T. Pottorff     
                                          -----------------------------   
                                          Richard T. Pottorff, Employee
 
ATTEST:


/s/Cheryl Wilkerson           
Cheryl Wilkerson, Secretary
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of The Cronos Group (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter J Younger, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, based on my knowledge, that:

                  (i)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934; and,

                  (iii)    The information contained in the Report fairly
                             presents, in all material respects, the financial
                             condition and results of operation of the Company.

March 20, 2003

/s/ PETER J. YOUNGER
--------------------
Peter J. Younger
Chief Financial Officer

                                                                        - E157 -
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We have issued our report dated April 14, 1999, accompanying the consolidated 
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Jayhawk Acceptance 
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference of said report on Form S-8 for the Jayhawk
Acceptance Corporation's Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option and Restricted
Stock Plan, Jayhawk Acceptance Corporation's Amended and Restated Non-Employee
Stock Option Plan and Jayhawk Acceptance Corporation's Employee Stock Purchase
Plan.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 14, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,714
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     53,964
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,922
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,774
<LOANS>                                        191,066
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,621
<DEPOSITS>                                     247,051
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,365
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,176
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,555
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 283,621
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,882
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,740
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   592
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                21,214
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,881
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,013
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,201
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      545
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  24
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,782
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,782
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.32
<LOANS-NON>                                        859
<LOANS-PAST>                                       240
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     6
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,783
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      451
<RECOVERIES>                                        84
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,961
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,789
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            172


</TABLE>
1629.

#### Rayfield *v.*The State.

Indictment for burglar}*, from Bibb superior court — Judge Felton. December 22, 1909.

Argued February 9,

Decided March 16, 1909.

*Martin & Mor code,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter J. Grace, solicitor-general,*contra.

Russell, J.

In a ease of burglary, where! the guilt of the accused depends upon the possession of an article alleged to have been contained in the house burglarized, it is essential that the identity of the article-found in his possession with the article which is alleged to have been stolen shall be established beyond a reasonable doubt. * The guilt of the defendant in the present instance being dependent upon proof of Ms unexplained possession of a razor, and the evidence failing to show that at the time of the burglary this razor was in the storehouse, alleged to have been burglarized, the conviction of the defendant was unauthorized" by the evidence, and a new trial should have been granted.

*Judgment reversed.*
IN RE: SKINNER

277A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 13, 2016

Ira Braswell, IV, Attorney at Law, for Skinner, Mark.

Jenna F. Butler, Attorney at Law, Alexander C. Dale, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, for Clark, Nancy Bass, et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 8th of September 2016 by Respondent:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of September 2016."

Respondent shall have up to and including the 26th day of October 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This AGREEMENT
(the “Amendment”) is made and entered into this 15th day of July, 2014 by and between Steven A. Shallcross (the
“Employee”) and Cytomedix, Inc. (the “Company”) (collectively, the “Parties”).


WHEREAS,
the Parties entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of May 30, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


WHEREAS,
Section 2(d) (ii) of the Employment Agreement recited certain of the Company’s purported previous grants of stock options
to the Employee (the “Previous Grants”); and


WHEREAS, a
number of the Previous Grants were not validly granted because they exceeded the limit on the number of options that may be granted
by the Company within any calendar year period (the “Excess Grants”); and the Company has already (with the Employee’s
knowledge and consent) revised and reformed the Previous Grants to be consistent with applicable individual grant limits (such
reformed grants hereinafter called the “Reformed Grants”); and


WHEREAS,
the Parties now also wish to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect their respective intents with respect to the Reformed Grants;


NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the Company’s undertaking to provide in connection with its next grant of options to the Employee
a vesting schedule more favorable to the Employee than the four year vesting schedule provided in connection with the Excess Grants,
and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the Parties, the Parties hereby agree
that Section 2(d) (ii) of the Employment Agreement be, and it hereby is amended, by adding thereto, the following sentence:


“Notwithstanding
the preceding or any other provision of this Agreement, Employee shall have rights to stock option(s) granted by the Company during
2014 only in numbers that conform to any limits on the number of stock options that may be granted to “Key Employees”
within any calendar year period under the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment to the Employment Agreement, to be effective as of May 30, 2014.







	CYTOMEDIX, INC.	 	EMPLOYEE	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Martin P. Rosendale	 	/s/ Steven A. Shallcross	 
	 	Martin P. Rosendale, CEO
DOUGLAS REDDY



CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON







To:

US Securities and Exchange Commission



I, Douglas Reddy do hereby consent to (i) the incorporation by reference of the following document(s) into the annual information form (the AIF) of Nevsun Resources Ltd. (the Issuer) dated March 24, 2005 to be filed with certain Canadian securities commissions and the annual report on Form 40-F (the 40-F) of the Issuer to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection therewith, and (ii) the inclusion of any extracts from or summary of such document(s) in the AIF and the 40-F:

1.  Technical Report on the Bisha Property and Resource Estimate of the Bisha Deposit, dated October 1, 2004

(collectively, the Technical Report)

I also certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical Report or that the written disclosure in the AIF or the 40-F of the Issuer contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in the Technical Report.



Dated this30 day of March, 2005.

signed

_______________________
Douglas Reddy

[Seal or Stamp]
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPI International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Joel A. Littman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ JOEL A. LITTMANJoel A. LittmanChief Financial OfficerAugust 12, 2009
Marie A. CROSS and Samuel A. Scudder v. CAPITAL TRANSACTION GROUP, INC. d/b/a Captran, and Wayne Walker.

No. 342P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Wayne C. Walker, Pro Se.

Samuel A. Scudder, Raleigh, for Cross & Scudder.

*688Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 661 S.E.2d 778.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of July 2008 by Defendant (Wayne Walker) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."

HUDSON, J., recused.
Donna Kirkman, Employee-Plaintiff, v. N.C. Department of Public Safety, Employer, Self-insured (Corvel Corporation, Third-Party Administrator), Defendant.

No. COA16-119

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 18, 2016

AFFIRMED.
Order entered April 22 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 01532

- CR

FELIX HERNANDEZ CISN EROS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. F11

- 60536

- U



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.
On April 9, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding wh y the
reporter’s record had not been filed. On April 18, 2013, we received the reporter’s record.

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the April 9, 2013 order
requiring findings.
Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days o f the date of this order

.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Exhibit
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Patent
Development Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
(section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
      HARVEY P. EISENName:
            Harvey
      P. EisenTitle:
            Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
            November
      14, 2008
 
 
 
 /s/
      IRA J. SOBOTKOName:
            Ira
      J. SobotkoTitle:
            Vice
      President, Chief Financial
              OfficerDate:
            November
      14, 2008
STATE of North Carolina v. Willie James STEELE, Jr.

No. COA15-827.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 17, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Error in part; Reversed and Remanded in part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 05-136] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of inventions for licensing. 

# SUMMARY:

The inventions listed below assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark office, and are available for licensing. 

# DATES:

September 16, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jerry L. Seemann, Patent Counsel, Marshall Space Flight Center, Mail Code LS01, Huntsville, AL 35812; telephone (256) 544-6580; fax (256) 544-0258.

NASA Case No. MFS-31891-1: Video Sensor with Range Measurement Capability;

NASA Case No. MFS-31805-1: Rotational-Translational Fourier Imaging System Requiring Only One Grid Pair;

NASA Case No. MFS-31825-1: Systems, Method and Apparatus to Decontaminate an Ultra-High Vacuum System; 

NASA Case No. MFS-31989-1: Systems, Methods and Apparatus for Vehicle Simulation; 

NASA Case No. MFS-32175-1: Systems, Methods and Apparatus for Determining Physical Properties of Fluids; 

NASA Case No. MFS-32214-1: Dual Expander Cycle Rocket Engine with an Intermediate, Closed-Cycle Heat Exchanger;

NASA Case No. MFS-32102-1: Boiler and Pressure Balls Monopropellant Thermal Rocket Engine. 

Dated: September 12, 2005. 

Keith T. Sefton, 

Deputy General Counsel, Administration and Management. 

[FR Doc. 05-18446 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended January 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert N.Wildrick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| April 11, 2006 |   | /s/ ROBERT N.  WILDRICK |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                |   | Robert N. Wildrick      |
|                |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----