alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18900]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIMES AND DATES: 12:30 p.m., Monday, September 26, 2005; and 8:30 a.m., 
Tuesday, September 27, 2005.

PLACE: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

STATUS: September 26--12:30 p.m. (Closed); September 27--8:30 a.m. 
(Open).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Monday, September 26 at 12:30 p.m. (Closed).

    1. Strategic Planning.
    2. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    3. Rate Case Planning.
    4. Proposed Filing with the Postal Rate Commission for Parcel 
Return Service.
    5. Office of Inspector General Fiscal Year 2006 Budget.
    6. Fiscal Year 2006 Integrated Financial Plan Briefing.
    7. Capital Investment.
    a. Kansas City, Missouri, Main Post Office Modification Request.

Tuesday, September 27, at 8:30 a.m. (Open).

    1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, August 1-2, 2005.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO Jack Potter.
    3. Committee Reports.
    4. Board of Governors Calendar Year 2006 Meeting Schedule.
    5. Office of the Governors Fiscal Year 2006 Budget.
    6. Postal Rate Commission Fiscal Year 2006 Budget.
    7. Fiscal Year 2006 Operating and Capital Plans.
    8. Strategic Transformation Plan 2006-2010.
    9. Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Performance Plan--Government Performance 
and Results Act.
    10. Capital Investment.
    a. San Juan, Puerto Rico, Processing and Distribution Center.
    11. Tentative Agenda for the November 1, 2005, meeting in 
Washington, DC.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: William T. Johnstone, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

William T. Johnstone,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-18900 Filed 9-16-05; 4:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tom Hofer, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report of Vendalux Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended March 31, 2000, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Vendalux Corporation

By:       /s/
   --------------------
   Name: Tom Hofer
   Title:   Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3923 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3923

  To amend the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 to 
expand the authority of governmental social service agencies with child 
 protection responsibilities to access the national crime information 
                               databases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2014

Ms. Bass (for herself, Ms. Chu, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
Grijalva, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Cook, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. McDermott, and Mr. 
  Langevin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 to 
expand the authority of governmental social service agencies with child 
 protection responsibilities to access the national crime information 
                               databases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY OF GOVERNMENTAL SOCIAL SERVICE 
              AGENCIES WITH CHILD PROTECTION RESPONSIBILITIES TO ACCESS 
              THE NATIONAL CRIME INFORMATION DATABASES.

    Section 151(a)(2) of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act 
of 2006 (42 U.S.C. 16961(a)(2)) is amended by striking ``, to be used 
by such agencies only in investigating or responding to reports of 
child abuse, neglect, or exploitation''.
                                 <all>
```
State of North Carolina v. Anthony Tyrone Brown

No. 207P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Ms. Lisa Miles, for Brown, Anthony Tyrone.

Ms. M. Lynne Weaver, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from *783the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 25th of May 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of May 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony Tyrone BROWN, Defendant.

No. COA15-825.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40636 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. SAN TO S TU RC I O S- O RT I Z , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 2: 09- C R

- 435- 1
B e fo r e G A R Z A , D E N N IS , a n d E L R O D , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der app oi n t ed to represent S an t os Tu rci os- O rt i z has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . C a lif o rn ia , 38 6 U
. S. 73 8 ( 19 67 )
. Tur c i o s - O r t i z ha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 12, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-40636 Document: 00511027561 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
Exhibit 31.2

Certifications

I, Edward Escudero, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Edward Escudero                  
|(Edward Escudero)                    
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
# C_2009153EN.01003902.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/39

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 28 April 2009 — Tailor v OHIM (Representation of a right pocket)

(Case T-283/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark representing a right pocket - Absolute ground for refusal - Absence of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Action manifestly devoid of any legal basis)

2009/C 153/76

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tom Tailor GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S.O. Gillert, K. Vanden Bossche and F. Schiwek, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 May 2007 (Case R 668/2006-1), concerning registration as a Community trade mark of a figurative sign representing a right pocket.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as manifestly devoid of any legal basis; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as manifestly devoid of any legal basis;

| 2. | Orders Tom Tailor GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tom Tailor GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             965
<SECURITIES>                                       270
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,433
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          81,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,396
<BONDS>                                            481
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           293
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,208
<SALES>                                         31,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               254,096
<CGS>                                           20,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  348,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (677)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (107,543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,828)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (110,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (110,371)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.77)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
  CONTROL BYJURISDICTION OFNAME OF SUBSIDIARY
    
    ORGANIZATION
    
    REGISTRANT
    
    SUBSIDIARYCarl Karcher Enterprises, Inc.
    
    California
    
    100%Hardees Food Systems, Inc.
    
    North Carolina
    
    100%Flagstar Enterprises, Inc.
    
    Alabama
    
    
    
    100%Spardees Realty, Inc.
    
    Alabama
    
    
    
    100%HED, Inc.
    
    North Carolina
    
    
    
    100%Burger Chef Systems, Inc.
    
    North Carolina
    
    
    
    100%Hardees LTD, Fribourg
    
    Switzerland
    
    
    
    98%Hardees REIT I, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    
    100%Hardees REIT II, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    
    100%CKE REIT I, Inc
    
    Delaware
    
    100%CKE REIT II, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    100%Carls Jr. Region VIII, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    
    100%Carls Jr. Media Fund
    
    California
    
    100%Carls Jr. National Production Fund
    
    California
    
    100%CKE Distribution, LLC
    
    California
    
    100%Aeroways, LLC
    
    California
    
    100%Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    100%La Salsa, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    
    
    100%GB Franchise Corporation
    
    California
    
    
    
    100%La Salsa of Nevada, Inc.
    
    Nevada
    
    
    
    100%Channel Islands Roasting Company
    
    California
    
    100%
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 05-142] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of inventions for licensing. 

# SUMMARY:

The inventions listed below are assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark office, and are available for licensing. 

# DATES:

September 16, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda B. Blackburn, Patent Counsel, Langley Research Center, Mail Code 141, Hampton, VA 23681-2199; telephone (757) 864-9260; fax (757) 864-9190. 

NASA Case No. LAR-16877-1: Double Vacuum Bag Process for Resin Matrix Composite Manufacturing; 

NASA Case No. LAR-17157-1: Liquid Crystalline Thermosets From Ester, Ester-Imide, and Ester-Amide Oligomers; 

NASA Case No. LAR-16615-2: Polyimide Foams; 

NASA Case No. LAR-16907-1: Deconvolution Methods and Systems for the Mapping of Acoustic Sources From Phased Microphone Arrays; 

NASA Case No. LAR-16437-1-NP: Templated Growth of Carbon Nanotubes; 

NASA Case No. LAR-16256-1: Method and Apparatus for Performance Optimization Through Physical Perturbation of Task Elements; 

NASA Case No. LAR-16535-1: Composite Panel Having Subsonic Transverse Wave Speed Characteristics; 

NASA Case No. LAR-15816-3: Piezoelectric Composite Apparatus and a Method for Fabricating the Same; 

NASA Case No. LAR-16900-1: Carbon Nanotube-Based Sensor and Method for Detection of Crack Growth in a Structure; 

NASA Case No. LAR-16946-1: Noise Reduction of Aircraft Flap. 

Dated: September 12, 2005. 

Keith T. Sefton, 

Deputy General Counsel, Administration and Management. 

[FR Doc. 05-18462 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
Linwood Wilson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joe Curtis, Defendant-Appellee.

No. COA16-194

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

AFFIRMED.
# C_2008037EN.01003501.xml

| 9.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/35

---

Action brought on 30 October 2007 — Daniela Smadja v Commission

(Case F-135/07)

(2008/C 37/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Daniela Smadja (New Delhi, India) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Re

Annulment of the decision of the Commission on the appointment of the applicant, an official initially graded A*15, step 4, in that it fixes her grade at Grade A*15, step 1, following her re-appointment to the post of Director of Directorate B of RELEX, after the annulment of her first appointment. Application for compensation for material and non-material damage

Form of order sought

| — | annul the appointment of the applicant of 21 December 2006, in that it grades her as Director at Grade A*15, step 1, and fixes her length of service in that step as from 1 November 2005, following her re-appointment on 15 November 2005 to the post of Director of Directorate B (Multilateral relations and human rights) of RELEX, a re-appointment which followed annulment of her first appointment to the same post in Case T-218/02 Napoli Buzzanca v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the appointment of the applicant of 21 December 2006, in that it grades her as Director at Grade A*15, step 1, and fixes her length of service in that step as from 1 November 2005, following her re-appointment on 15 November 2005 to the post of Director of Directorate B (Multilateral relations and human rights) of RELEX, a re-appointment which followed annulment of her first appointment to the same post in Case T-218/02 Napoli Buzzanca v Commission;

Napoli Buzzanca

Commission

| — | order the defendant to pay as compensation for material and non-material harm, and damage to the applicant's career, a sum of EUR 25 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay as compensation for material and non-material harm, and damage to the applicant's career, a sum of EUR 25 000;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

---
Victor Howard v. Patricia E. Chambers; Mattocks Enterprises, Inc.; Steve N. Mattocks, individually; Jason L. Panciera, individually; and Cawthorne, Moss & Panciera, P.C.

No. 90A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Victor Howard, Pro Per.

Doug McClanahan, Attorney at Law, For Mattocks Enterprises, Inc., et al.

R. Keith Shackleford, Attorney at Law, For Panciera, Jason L.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 14th of March 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
Filed 9/23/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2008 ND 168

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Robert Lee Johnson, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20080021 - 20080022

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard W. Grosz, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Frederick R. Fremgen, State’s Attorney (on brief), 511 Second Avenue SE, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, for plaintiff and appellee.

Jessica J. Ahrendt (on brief), Marshall County Courthouse, 208 East Colvin Avenue, Suite 17, Warren, Minn. 56762, and Mark T. Blumer, 341 Central Avenue North, Suite 3, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Johnson

Nos. 20080021 - 20080022

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Robert Johnson appeals two district court judgments entered after a jury found him guilty of contact by bodily fluids with a law enforcement officer and a person lawfully present in a correctional facility who is not an inmate, in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-11(1)(a) and (c).  Johnson argues there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury verdict.  Testimony and forensic evidence presented at the trial support the jury findings.  Concluding the criminal judgments are supported by substantial evidence, we affirm the district court criminal judgments under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner