alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Yukon Gold
Corporation, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2005
(the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 9, 2005


                                        /s/ W. Warren Holmes
                                        -------------------------------
                                        W. Warren Holmes, CEO
                                        (Chief Executive Officer of Yukon Gold
                                        Corporation, Inc.)

Dated: December 9, 2005


                                        /s/ Rakesh Malhotra
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Rakesh Malhotra, Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Chief Financial Officer of Yukon Gold
                                        Corporation, Inc.)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. and will be retained by Yukon Gold
Corporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
State of North Carolina v. Jeffrey Castillo

No. 222P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Kerstin Walker Sutton, Attorney at Law, Durham, Stephen P. Lindsay, Attorney at Law, for Castillo, Jeffrey.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 7th of June 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of June 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136603 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136603 

 COA: 285067 

Marquette CC: 07-044489-FH

WARD PAUL MACKEY,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Viewpoint
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for
the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, William H. Mitchell, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that based on my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report to which this certification
    is attached as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                            



| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ WILLIAM H. MITCHELL

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | William H. Mitchell    
| | Chief Financial Officer

Dated: April 29, 2004
State of North Carolina v. Trent Marcel Davis, Defendant.

No. COA15-1268

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 16, 2016

NO ERROR.
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond One, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Robert S. Chramosta,
President and Chief Executive Officer and Troy Fullmer, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.



December 15, 2005               By:   /s/ Robert Chramosta
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Robert Chramosta, President and Chief
                                     Executive Officer


December 14, 2005               By:   /s/ Troy Fullmer
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Troy Fullmer, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS
           (PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

      I, Robert W. DeCook, certify that:

In connection with the Annual Report of Horizon Financial  Services  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert W. DeCook,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906, or another
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required  by  Section  906,  has been  provided  to Horizon  Financial  Services
Corporation and will be retained by Horizon Financial  Services  Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

Date: September 28, 2004


                                                      /s/ Robert W. DeCook
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                       56
STATE of North Carolina v. Ramon A. BLACK.

No. COA15-1283.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error in Part; No Prejudicial Error in Part.
State of North Carolina v. Terry Cherrelle Gray, Jr. and Charles Hezekiah Gilchrist, Jr.

No. 78P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Gilchrist, Charles Hezekiah (Jr.)

Narendra K. Ghosh, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Gray, Terry Cherrelle (Jr.)

Andrew O. Furuseth, Assistant Attorney General, David D. Lennon, Assistant Attorney General, Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of March 20 16 by Defendant (Terry Cherrelle Gray, Jr.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
# C_2008051EN.01001401.xml

| 23.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2007 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union

(Case C-184/06) (1)

1

(Fisheries - Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 - Allocation of catch quotas among Member States - Act of Accession of the Kingdom of Spain - End of the transitional period - Requirement of relative stability - Principle of non-discrimination - New fishing opportunities)

(2008/C 51/22)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. De Gregorio Merino and A. Westerhof Löfflerova, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. van Rijn and F. Jimeno Fernández, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant):

Re:

Annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 of 22 December 2005 fixing for 2006 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required (OJ 2006 L 16, p. 1) — Discrimination — Application of Article 20(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy (OJ 2002 L 358, p. 59)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 154, 1.7.2007.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2005-22056]


Public Meeting To Discuss the Implementation of the North 
American Standard for Cargo Securement; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) 
published in the Federal Register on August 31, 2005 (70 FR 51857) a 
notice of a public meeting concerning the implementation of the North 
American Standard for Protection Against Shifting or Falling Cargo. The 
meeting was scheduled to be held on September 29-30, 2005 at the Beau 
Rivage Resort in Biloxi, Mississippi. However, due to the devastation 
caused by Hurricane Katrina, the location of this meeting has been 
moved from Biloxi, Mississippi, to the Hyatt Regency Indianapolis which 
is located at One South Capitol Avenue, Indianapolis IN 46204. 
Reservations can be made by contacting the Hyatt Regency Indianapolis 
by phone (317) 632-1234 or by fax (317) 616-6299.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 29-30, 2005. The meeting 
will begin at 1 p.m. and end at 5 p.m. on September 29, 2005 and 
continue from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. on September 30, 2005.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hyatt Regency Indianapolis, 
One South Capitol Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46204.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Larry W. Minor, Director of the 
Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations (MC-PS), (202) 366-
4009, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20590.

    Issued on: September 12, 2005.
Warren Hoemann,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-18479 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-M
Exhibit 99.4

McLeodUSA Incorporated
McLeodUSA Technology Park
6400 C Street SW, P.O. Box 3177
Cedar Rapids, IA 52406-3177

April 12,
2002

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

This
letter is written pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X.

McLeodUSA
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation ("McLeodUSA"), has received a representation letter from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"), McLeodUSA's independent public accountants, in connection with
the issuance of Andersen's audit report included within this filing on Form 10-K. In its letter, Andersen has represented to us that its audit of the consolidated balance sheets of
McLeodUSA and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to this audit.

Very
truly yours,

/s/
Chris A. Davis Chris A. DavisChief Operating and
Financial Officer

---
Sharee M. COVINGTON, Plaintiff, v. ALAN VESTER MOTOR COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

No. COA15-1002.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Dismissed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136325 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136325 

 COA: 282339 

Wayne CC: 04-004863-FH

WILLIAM EARL COATS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 21, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00206

- CV

MODIVCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC formerly known as LogistiCare Solutions, LLC

, Appellant

v.

Fidencio GALLARDO, Josefina Gallardo, Juliana Gallardo, Maria Doloroes Zertuche, Ana Delia Gallardo, Fidencion Gallardo Castillo, Jr., Fermin Gallardo, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Maria Gallardo Castillo, deceased, Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CVA001485D3
Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. C h a pa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Appellant Modivcare Solutions , LLC , formerly known as Logisticare Solutions , LLC, filed a notice of interlocutory appeal citing section 51.014(a)(8) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. The statute is reserved for governmental unit s

. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. §§ 51.014, 101.001.

Based on the rec ord, we conclude Appellant is not a governmental unit under section

101.001. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 101.001; Univ. of the Incarnate Word v.
Redus ( Redus I

), 518 S.W.3d 905, 911 (Tex. 2017); Orion Real Estate v. Sarro , 559 S.W.3d 599,

602

- 0 3 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2018, no pet.); Gonzales Nursing Operations , LLC v. Smith

, No. 04

- 20

- 00102

- CV, 2020 WL 5646482, at *3 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Sept. 23, 2020, pet. denied) (mem. op.) ; AECOM USA, Inc. v. Mata , No. 04

- 15

- 00773

- CV, 2016 WL 5112222, at *2, *4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Sept. 21, 2016, pet. denied) (mem. op.)

.

Accordingly, this court does not have jurisdiction to consider Appellants’ interlocutory appeal. See Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu , 233 S.W.3d 835, 84 0

– 43 (Tex. 2007)

.However, Appellant asked that, if we concluded we do not have appellate jurisdiction for

an interlocutory appeal, we treat their filing as a petition for writ of mandamus. Appellant’s request is granted. We direct the Clerk of the Court to change the designation of appellate cause
number 04

- 22

- 00206

- CV from an appeal to an original proceeding, and this court will review the petition accordingly

. See CMH Homes v. Perez , 340 S.W.3d 444, 453 (Tex. 2011).

Because no petition has yet been filed, this cas e will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in ten days, unless Appellant files a petition for writ of mandamus that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3 in the interim.

It is so ORDERED on this 21st day of April 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Viewpoint
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for
the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jay S. Amato, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, in accordance with
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on
my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report to which this certification
    is attached as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                            



| |     |                 
| | --- | ----------------
| | By: | /s/ JAY S. AMATO

| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| |                                          
| | Jay S. Amato                             
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

Dated: April 29, 2004
# C_2010234EN.01005502.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/55

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — Lesniak v Commission

(Case F-67/06) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Officials - Appointment - Temporary agents appointed as officials - Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment - Classification in grade pursuant to the new, less favourable rules - Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

2010/C 234/100

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Christophe Lesniak (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Simm and I. Šulce, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission decision of 8 August 2005 appointing the applicant — at that time a member of the temporary staff in grade A*10, step 2, and a successful candidate in External Competition PE/99/A — as a probationary official in grade A*6, step 2

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to beat their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to beat their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178 of 29.07.06, p. 43.

1

---
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
  In
        connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SouthCrest
        Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
        (the “ Periodic Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the
        Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States
        Code,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
        the
        best of his individual knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.
  Dated:
        August 14, 2007
 /s/
                  Larry T. KuglarLarry
                  T. Kuglar
                Chief
                  Executive
                  Officer ****
State v. Mark Wayne Ballard

125P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

Mark Wayne Ballard, Pro Se.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of April 2016 by Defendant for Equitable Tolling:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."