alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                             871
<SECURITIES>                                       562
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    106,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          82,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,323<F1>
<BONDS>                                            507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           293
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,431
<SALES>                                         17,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,154
<CGS>                                           11,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (684)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,596)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,116)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,480)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,480)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.71)
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY UTILIZES AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET PRESENTATION. THIS FORMAT
WAS FOLLOWED BASED ON THE PREMISE THAT THE VIDEOCASSETTE RENTAL INVENTORY
REPRESENTS ASSETS USED BY THE COMPANY TO GENERATE CURRENT OPERATING INCOME, AND
MANAGEMENT BELIEVES THAT TO CLASSIFY ALL OF THESE COSTS AS NONCURRENT WOULD BE
MISLEADING TO THE READERS OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BECAUSE IT WOULD NOT
INDICATE THE LEVEL OF ASSETS EXPECTED TO BE CONVERTED INTO CASH IN THE NEXT YEAR
AS A RESULT OF THE RENTALS OF VIDEOCASSETTES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1755

LISA ANTOINE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DELANCY LLC, d/b/a Vital Medical Staffing,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:20-cv-00523-GCM)

Submitted: December 15, 2022 Decided: December 19, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lisa Antoine, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1755 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Antoine appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary 

judgment and denying Antoine summary judgment on Antoine’s discrimination and 

retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 

to 634. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

the district court’s order. Antoine v. Delancy LLC, No. 3:20-cv-00523-GCM (W.D.N.C. 

July 13, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1755 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55131-55132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages

[[Page 55132]]

either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a 
nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 
CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely 
related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless 
otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the 
United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than October 4, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Cindy West, Manager) 1455 
East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania; to acquire HW Holdings, Richmond, Virginia, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Harris Williams & Co., and Harris Williams Advisors, 
Inc., and engage in broker dealer activities and advising clients on 
merger and acquisition matters, pursuant to sections 225.28(b)(6)(iii) 
and (b)(7)(i) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 15, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-18695 Filed 9-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4012 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4012

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 20, 2014

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from proposing, 
  finalizing, or disseminating regulations or assessments based upon 
            science that is not transparent or reproducible.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secret Science Reform Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. DATA TRANSPARENCY.

    Section 6(b) of the Environmental Research, Development, and 
Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 4363 note) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(b)(1) The Administrator shall not propose, finalize, or 
disseminate a covered action unless all scientific and technical 
information relied on to support such covered action is--
            ``(A) specifically identified; and
            ``(B) publicly available online in a manner that is 
        sufficient for independent analysis and substantial 
        reproduction of research results.
    ``(2) Nothing in the subsection shall be construed as requiring the 
public dissemination of information the disclosure of which is 
prohibited by law.
    ``(3) In this subsection--
            ``(A) the term `covered action' means a risk, exposure, or 
        hazard assessment, criteria document, standard, limitation, 
        regulation, regulatory impact analysis, or guidance; and
            ``(B) the term `scientific and technical information' 
        includes--
                    ``(i) materials, data, and associated protocols 
                necessary to understand, assess, and extend 
                conclusions;
                    ``(ii) computer codes and models involved in the 
                creation and analysis of such information;
                    ``(iii) recorded factual materials; and
                    ``(iv) detailed descriptions of how to access and 
                use such information.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 19, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
James Townsend and Lucretia Townsend, Plaintiffs, v. N.C. Department of Transportation, Defendant.

No. COA16-478

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: December 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137196 & (3)(4) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

IN RE ANONYMOUS JUDGE SC: 137196 Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

______________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion to seal the record and the motion for immediate 

consideration are GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, 

and relief is DENIED because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the 

requested relief. It appears the Judicial Tenure Commission has granted, pursuant to 

MCR 9.207(D), an extension to answer until October 31, 2008. The next scheduled 

meeting after that date at which a formal complaint could be authorized is November 10, 

2008, after the November 4, 2008 general election. 

0916 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 19, 2008 

 Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. Pedro BERRERO

No. 326P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Pedro Berrero, for Berrero, Pedro.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 31st of August 2016 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Onslow County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3865 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3865

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from modifying the standard 
for determining whether an organization is operated exclusively for the 
 promotion of social welfare for purposes of section 501(c)(4) of the 
                     Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Targeting of Political Beliefs 
by the IRS Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABLE STANDARD FOR DETERMINATIONS OF WHETHER AN 
              ORGANIZATION IS OPERATED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE PROMOTION OF 
              SOCIAL WELFARE.

    (a) In General.--The standard and definitions as in effect on 
January 1, 2010, which are used to determine whether an organization is 
operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare for purposes 
of section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall apply 
for purposes of determining the status of organizations under section 
501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (b) Prohibition on Modification of Standard.--The Secretary of the 
Treasury may not (nor may any delegate of such Secretary) issue, 
revise, or finalize any regulation (including the proposed regulations 
published at 78 Fed. Reg. 71535 (November 29, 2013)), revenue ruling, 
or other guidance not limited to a particular taxpayer relating to the 
standard and definitions specified in subsection (a).
    (c) Application to Organizations.--Except as provided in subsection 
(d), this section shall apply with respect to any organization claiming 
tax exempt status under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 which was created on, before, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Sunset.--This section shall not apply after the one-year period 
beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3865

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from modifying the standard 
for determining whether an organization is operated exclusively for the 
 promotion of social welfare for purposes of section 501(c)(4) of the 
                     Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
```
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 (the “Report”) of Hercules Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Lund, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| Date: November 1, 2018 | By:    | /S/ DAVID LUND

                                                   |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | David Lund                                                              |
|                   |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer, and 

Interim Chief Accounting Officer |
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NES Rentals Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endingMarch 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, F. Duffield Meyercord, Chief RestructuringOfficer and Interim Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tomy knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ F. DUFFIELD MEYERCORD       |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
| F. Duffield Meyercord           |
| Interim Chief Executive Officer |
| May 17, 2004                    |

 

----
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 09, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A1935. NORRIS BERNARD LEWIS, JR. v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On July 14, 2017, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than July 24, 2017. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 09, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2008 – Audi v OHIM (Vorsprung durch Technik)**

**(Case T-70/06)**

Community trade mark – Application for Community word mark Vorsprung durch Technik – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Partial refusal to register the mark by the examiner – Right to a fair hearing

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of any distinctive character (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 41-46)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 December 2005 (Case R 237/2005-2) dismissing in part the appeal against the examiner’s decision refusing registration of the word mark Vorsprung durch Technik for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 14, 25, 28, 37 to 40 and 42. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Audi AG |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark Vorsprung durch Technik for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 25, 28, 35 to 43 and 45 – Application No 3016292 |
| Decision of the examiner: | Registration partially dismissed |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal partially dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Audi AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
State of North Carolina v. Joseph Maurice Craig

No. 359P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this December 19, 2016. December 8, 2016

Mr. Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Attorney at Law, Southern Pines, For Joseph Maurice Craig.

Mr. David Learner, District Attorney, Ms. Amy Kunstling Irene, Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Ervin, J.

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th of September 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
Xechem International,  Inc. and its subsidiaries on Forms S-8 Numbers (33-87034)
and (33-93300) as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on July 16,
1996, of our report dated  February 18, 2000, on our audits of the  consolidated
financial  statements of Xechem  International,  Inc. and its subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999, and for the year then ended, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

                                    Wiss & Company, LLP
                                    Certified Public Accountants.

Livingston, New Jersey
February 18, 2000
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-150129) pertaining to the DARA BioSciences, Inc. 2003 Amended and Restated Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan
and the DARA BioSciences, Inc. 2008 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan of DARA BioSciences, Inc.,
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-150150) of DARA BioSciences, Inc.,
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-165884) of DARA BioSciences, Inc., and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-171449) of DARA BioSciences, Inc.;
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 25, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of DARA BioSciences, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of DARA BioSciences,
Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina

March 25, 2011
POWELL v. STATE of NC

260P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Archie David Powell, Jr., For Powell, Archie David (Jr.).

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of July 2016 by Plaintiff for Complaint/Claim:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."