alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
FPA Medical Management, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-41989, 333-20007, and
333-31351) and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-31341, 333-34027, 333-16741 and
33-00074) of our report dated March 15, 1996, on our audit of the consolidated
financial statements of Sterling Healthcare Group, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1995, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
---------------------------------
    Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Miami, Florida
March 27, 1998
EXHIBIT 31: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification  I, Fang Jinzhong, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China Huaren Organic Products, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.   Date: May 21, 2007 /s/ Fang Jinzhong Fang Jinzhong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. ALEJANDRO PARRA

- RAMOS,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 50216
D.C. No. 3:17

- cr - 00240

- LAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 19, 2018 **
Before: THO MAS, Chief Judge, and TROTT and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. Alejandro Parra

- Ramos appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 24

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U .S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 23 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 50216

Parra

- Ramos argues for the first time on appeal that the prosecutor breached the terms of the parties’ plea agreement by stating that he would “take the fifth” in response to the district court’s request that he explain the re asoning behind the agreed

- upon recommendation of a two

- month sentence and by stating that there “[ was ]n’t any rationality” to the recommendation in light of the 84

- month sentence recommended by the government in another illegal reentry case the same day. The government argues that Parra

- Ramos waived this claim. We decline to decide
whether Parra

- Ramos waived his breach claim because, even if merely forfeited,
he cannot establish plain error. 1 S ee United States v. Whitney , 673 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2012 ). Even if the government breached the plea agreement by implicitly disclaiming the agreed

- upon recommendation , the breach did not affect Parra

Ramos’ s substantial rights. See United States v. Gonzalez

- Aguilar , 718 F.3d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir. 2013). At sentencing, the district court focused on Parra

- Ramos’s five prior convictions for immigration offenses and his failure to be deterred by previous sentences. Even defense counsel recognized at sentencing that, in light of
Parra

- Ramos’s history , the cou rt would be “disinclined” to follow the parties’
recommendation. Under these circumstances, there is no reasonable probability

1 We do not approve of “taking the fifth” when asked by a judge about the reasoning behind a plea ag reement and then saying it had “no rationality.” We expect more serious responses by officers of the court, especially when the issue is the length of a defen dant’ s sentence.3 17

- 50216

that the al leged breach affected the court’ s sentencing determination. See id. at
1188

- 89.
AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Kitty Hawk, Inc. (the Company), does hereby
certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30,
2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. Date: November 8, 2004
    By:
    /s/ ROBERT W. ZOLLER, JR.Robert W. Zoller, Jr.Chief Executive Officer and President Date: November 8, 2004
    By:
    /s/ RANDY S. LEISERRandy S. LeiserVice President and Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
**Section906 Certifications**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of **Nevsun Resources Ltd.** (the“Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending **December 31, 2012**, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), **I**, **Fausto Taddei, Chief Financial Officer** ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1. | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: **March 20, 2013**

|   | **/s/ *FaustoTaddei***                          |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
| By:    | *__________________________*                    |
|   | **Fausto Taddei****Chief    Financial Officer** |

----
# C_2009267EN.01005501.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/55

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2009 — Dongguan Nanzha Leco Stationery v Council of the European Union

(Case T-296/06) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of lever arch mechanisms originating in China - Determination of the dumping margin - Market economy treatment - Comparison between the normal value and the export price - Application of a different method to that used during the initial investigation - Article 2(7)(a) and (10) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96)

2009/C 267/93

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dongguan Nanzha Leco Stationery Mfg. Co., Ltd (Dongguan, China) (represented by: A. Bentley, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch, Lawyer)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendants: Commission of the European Communities (represented by H. van Vliet and T. Scharf, Agents); IML Industria Meccanica Lombarda Srl (Offanengo, Italy); Interkov spol. s.r.o. (Bráník, Czech Republic); MI.ME.CA. Srl (Ricengo, Italy); and NIKO — kovinarsko podjetje, d.d. Železniki (Železniki, Slovenia) (represented by R. Bierwagen, Lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1136/2006 of 24 July 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of lever arch mechanisms originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2006 L 205, p. 1), in so far as it applies to the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dongguan Nanzha Leco Stationery Mfg. Co., Ltd, to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, IML Industria Meccanica Lombarda Srl, Interkov spol. s r.o., MI.ME.CA. Srl and NIKO — kovinarsko podjetje, d.d. Železniki; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dongguan Nanzha Leco Stationery Mfg. Co., Ltd, to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, IML Industria Meccanica Lombarda Srl, Interkov spol. s r.o., MI.ME.CA. Srl and NIKO — kovinarsko podjetje, d.d. Železniki;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 310, 16.12.2006.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Peter Papano, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ PETER PAPANO                     
|Peter Papano                         
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|May 10, 2005
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3910 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to allow the United States Postal 

Service to provide nonpostal services, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2014 

Mr. COHEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to allow the United 

States Postal Service to provide nonpostal services, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expand Nonpostal 

5 Services to Americans Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO OFFER NONPOSTAL SERVICES. 

7 Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3910 IH

1 (A) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (B) in paragraph (8), by striking the pe4 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(9) to provide nonpostal services.’’; and 

7 (2) by striking subsection (e). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2009102EN.01003802.xml

| 1.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/38

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 10 March 2009 — Giaprakis v Committee of the Regions

(Case F-106/07) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Remuneration - Transfer of part of the emoluments outside the country of employment - Article 17(2)(b) of Annex VII to the old Staff Regulations - Building savings account - Recovery of amounts wrongly paid - Conditions - Irregularity of the transfers - Obvious nature of the irregularity)

2009/C 102/56

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stavros Giaprakis (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Committee of the Regions of the European Union (represented by: P. Cervilla, agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 21 November 2006 to recover the amounts paid to the applicant in respect of the correction coefficient on part of his emoluments transferred to France from April 2004 to June 2005 because of the alleged failure to comply with the conditions required for that transfer — Application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Committee of the Regions of the European Union of 21 November 2006 ordering the recovery of sums resulting from the application of the correction coefficient to part of the emoluments of Mr Giaprakis transferred to France from April 2004 to June 2005, amounting to EUR 1 246,06; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Committee of the Regions of the European Union of 21 November 2006 ordering the recovery of sums resulting from the application of the correction coefficient to part of the emoluments of Mr Giaprakis transferred to France from April 2004 to June 2005, amounting to EUR 1 246,06;

| 2. | Orders the Committee of the Regions of the European Union to reimburse Mr Giaprakis EUR 1 246,06, together with default interest from the date of the recovery until the date of the actual payment, at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations and applicable during the period concerned, increased by 2 points; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Committee of the Regions of the European Union to reimburse Mr Giaprakis EUR 1 246,06, together with default interest from the date of the recovery until the date of the actual payment, at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations and applicable during the period concerned, increased by 2 points;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders the Committee of the Regions of the European Union to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Committee of the Regions of the European Union to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 8.12.2007, p. 49.

1

---
In the Matter of: T.W.

No. COA16-399

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 18, 2016

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
Dabeeruddin KHAJA v. Fatima HUSNA.

No. 375A15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Deborah Sandlin, Raleigh, for Khaja, Dabeeruddin.

Debra A. Griffiths, Raleigh.

Fatima Husna, for Husna, Fatima.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 11th of November 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiff, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 24th of November 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3783 

To amend section 1101 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

to extend for one year the high risk health insurance pool program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2013 

Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend section 1101 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to extend for one year the high risk 

health insurance pool program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rate Protection Act 

5 of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. 1-YEAR EXTENSION OF HIGH RISK HEALTH INSUR7 ANCE POOL PROGRAM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsections (a) and (g)(3) of sec9 tion 1101 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3783 IH

1 Act (42 U.S.C. 18001) are each amended by striking 

2 ‘‘January 1, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2015’’. 

3 (b) TRANSITIONAL FUNDING.—Section 1101(g)(1) of 

4 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is amend5 ed by inserting ‘‘(plus an additional amount, not to exceed 

6 $1,500,000,000)’’ after ‘‘$5,000,000,000’’. 

7 (c) TRANSITIONAL RULES FOR 2014.—Section 

8 1101(g)(3) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 

9 Act is amended— 

10 (1) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘; TRANSITION’’ 

11 after ‘‘AUTHORITY’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(C) TREATMENT DURING 1-YEAR EXTEN15 SION PERIOD.—In implementing this section 

16 during 2014, the following rules shall apply: 

17 ‘‘(i) NO NEW ENROLLMENT.—Except 

18 as provided in clause (ii), eligible individ19 uals are limited to those individuals who 

20 are enrolled in a qualified high risk pool 

21 through the program under this section as 

22 of December 31, 2013. 

23 ‘‘(ii) TRANSITION FOR INDIVIDUALS

24 ENROLLED IN A NON-FEDERALLY-OPER25 ATED HIGH RISK POOL THAT TERMINATES


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3783 IH

1 OPERATIONS IN 2014.—If a qualified high 

2 risk pool under this section is operated as 

3 of December 31, 2013, through a State or 

4 other eligible entity (other than the Fed5 eral Government) and such State or other 

6 eligible entity terminates operations of 

7 such pool after such date, the Secretary 

8 shall establish such procedures as may be 

9 necessary to enable eligible individuals who 

10 are enrolled in such qualified high risk pool 

11 as of the day before the date of the termi12 nation to enroll in the qualified high risk 

13 pool operated under this section by the 

14 Federal Government for the remainder of 

15 2014.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Titan Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     a)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

     b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company

Date December 15, 2005
                                               /s/ Ronald L. Wilder
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Ronald L. Wilder,  President
                                               (Chief  Executive  Officer)
                                               (Chief  Financial  Officer)