alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009055EN.01002201.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/22

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 January 2009 — Kronoply v Commission

(Case T-162/06) (1)

1

(State aid - Regional aid for large investment projects - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Statement of reasons - Incentive effect of the aid - Necessity of the aid)

(2009/C 55/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG (Heiligengrabe, Germany) (represented by: R. Nierer and L. Gordalla, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by: K. Gross and T. Scharf, and subsequently by V. Kreuschitz, K. Gross and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/262/EC of 21 September 2005 on State aid No C 5/2004 (ex N 609/2003) which Germany is planning to implement for Kronoply (OJ 2006 L 94, p. 50).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trans
Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. Corp, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ JOHN G. CORP           
|John G. Corp               
|Principal Executive Officer
|September 26, 2013         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Companys Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6821

ROBERT LEE REYNOLDS, II,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

J. NEAL, Unit Manager at FCI Edgefield; JOHN J. LAMANNA,

Warden at FCI Edgefield; RAY HOLT, Regional Director; HARRELL

WATTS, General Counsel,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (4:07-cv-01724-CMC)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 23, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Reynolds, II, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Reynolds, II, appeals from the district

court's order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and

dismissing his Bivens*

 action. Our review of the record discloses

that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s dismissal on the reasoning of the district court.

Reynolds v. Neal, No. 4:07-cv-01724-CMC (D.S.C. May 12, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Tom Hofer, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2003, that the Annual Report of Vendalux Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended March 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Vendalux Corporation

By: /s/
   --------------------
   Name: Tom Hofer
   Title:   Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.9

CONSENT OF CHRIS OSIOWY

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the
AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



| | 1. | The technical report dated March 14, 2011, as amended March 30, 2011, entitled Red Lake Gold Operation, Ontario, Canada, NI 43-101 Technical
Report (the Red Lake Report); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Red Lake Report and the Red Lake Gold Mines, and the
properties described therein.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information
contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-138760, 333-151243, 333-151251 and 333-174376 on Form S-8 of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2012

/s/ Chris OsiowyName: Chris Osiowy, P. Geo.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00505-CV

In re IMA of Kansas, Inc.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief are denied. See

Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Filed: August 23, 2011
STATE v. John David WATSON.

No. 39P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Feb. 9, 2016.

Marie Hare Mobley, Smithfield, Attorney at Law, for Watson, John David.

Richard G. Sowerby, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Valerie Mitchell Asbell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of February 2016 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of February 2016."
STATE of North Carolina v. Ahking Kaliek WILLIAMS.

No. 49P16.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Whitney Hendrix Belich, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Ahking Kaliek Williams, for Williams, Ahking Kaliek.

James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of February 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
# C_2008183EN.01000201.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 June 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-226/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 89/391/EEC - Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work - Articles 2, 10(1) and 12(3) and (4) - Defective transposition)

(2008/C 183/02)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and I. Kaufmann-Bühler, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and C. Bergeot-Nunes, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the provisions necessary to comply with Articles 2, 10(1), and 12(3) and (4) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ 1989 L 183, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the provisions necessary to comply with Articles 2, 10(1), and 12(3) and (4) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the provisions necessary to comply with Articles 2, 10(1), and 12(3) and (4) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PAGE>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                              72,082
<SECURITIES>                        60,416
<RECEIVABLES>                      270,284
<ALLOWANCES>                        57,552
<INVENTORY>                     10,382,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0
<PP&E>                           5,828,273
<DEPRECIATION>                  (2,138,622)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  18,699,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0
<BONDS>                         11,822,575
<COMMON>                         2,905,682
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                       2,511,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    18,699,232
<SALES>                          2,481,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 2,636,452
<CGS>                            1,766,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    2,237,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  40,072
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    364,660
<INCOME-TAX>                       146,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                218,660
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                       218,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        

</TABLE>
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 14 February 2008 – Usinor v OHIM – Corus UK (GALVALLOY)**

**(Case T-189/05)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark GALVALLOY – Earlier national word mark GALVALLIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 69, 71-72)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 February 2005 (Case R 411/2004‐1) in respect of opposition proceedings between Usinor SA and Corus UK Ltd. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Corus UK Ltd |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark GALVALLOY for goods in Class 6 – Application No 796557 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Usinor SA |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | National word mark GALVALLIA for goods in Class 6 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Refusal of registration |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Decision of the Opposition Division set aside |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 10 February 2005 (Case R 411/2004‐1); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Usinor SA; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders Corus UK Ltd to bear its own costs. |
STATE of North Carolina v. Rodney Maurice LUTZ

No. 315P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

Mr. Rodney Maurice Lutz, Pro se.

Mr. Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, For State.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of August 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
# C_2009167EN.01000901.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/9

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 June 2009 — NDSHT v Commission

(Case T-152/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Complaint by a competitor - Letters from the Commission to a complainant - Existing aid - Non-actionable measure - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 167/18

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: M. Merola and L. Armati, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. Scharf, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision contained in the Commission’s letters to NDSHT of 24 March and 28 April 2006, relating to a complaint concerning allegedly unlawful State aid granted by the City of Stockholm to Stockholm Visitors Board AB (Case CP 178/04 — Alleged State aid to SVB AB),

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 29.7.2006.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          29,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,481
<INVENTORY>                                     12,869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,656
<PP&E>                                         208,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 444,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,264
<BONDS>                                        233,629
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           139
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,489
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   444,332
<SALES>                                         67,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,449
<CGS>                                           56,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    51
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                       773
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                906
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           58
<NET-INCOME>                                       848
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Leroy WILKIE, Defendant.

No. COA15-762.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Date: December 27, 2005

/s/ Neil Christiansen

Neil Christiansen

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3790 

To repeal the annual adjustment of retired pay and retainer pay amounts 

for retired members of the Armed Forces under age 62. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2013 

Mr. MILLER of Florida (for himself, Mr. BARBER, Mr. BENISHEK, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mrs. 

BUSTOS, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. COFFMAN, Mr. COLE, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. 

CRENSHAW, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. DUNCAN of South 

Carolina, Mr. ENYART, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. FINCHER, Mr. FORBES, 

Ms. FRANKEL of Florida, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. 

GARCIA, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. GRAYSON, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mr. GRIMM, Ms. HANABUSA, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. HONDA, Mr. 

HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. 

JONES, Mr. KEATING, Mr. KING of New York, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Mr. 

LANCE, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. LOEBSACK, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. MICA, Mr. MURPHY

of Florida, Mr. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. 

O’ROURKE, Mr. OWENS, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. PEARCE, Ms. PINGREE of 

Maine, Mr. POSEY, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. RIGELL, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. ROSS, Mr. RUIZ, Mr. RUNYAN, Mr. AUSTIN

SCOTT of Georgia, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. SIMPSON, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. 

SOUTHERLAND, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. TERRY, Ms. TITUS, Mr. 

TURNER, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. VELA, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WALZ, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. YODER, Mr. YOHO, Mr. 

COOK, Mr. CARTER, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, and Mr. PERRY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the annual adjustment of retired pay and retainer 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3790 IH

pay amounts for retired members of the Armed Forces 

under age 62. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT OF RETIRED 

4 PAY AND RETAINER PAY AMOUNTS FOR RE5 TIRED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 

6 UNDER AGE 62. 

7 Section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 

8 is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS