alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from MovieFone,
Inc.'s consolidated financial statements as of and for the twelve months ended
December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,560,007
<SECURITIES>                                 3,003,839
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,213,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    103,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,187,312
<PP&E>                                       5,402,602
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,629,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,955,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,263,997
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,060
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,563,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,955,989
<SALES>                                        217,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,355,322
<CGS>                                          229,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,835,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,957,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,957,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,957,287)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
In re K.D., a minor child, and C.D.,1 a minor child.

No. COA15-1365.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   5

<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                        6,073,912
<SECURITIES>                                                  11,278,011
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 12,123,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              29,475,450
<PP&E>                                                        2,912,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (1,363,852)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                31,024,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         12,340,412
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                      1,255
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    18,682,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  31,024,318
<SALES>                                                       14,238,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              14,238,892
<CGS>                                                         11,026,733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 11,026,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              2,116,920
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            33,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               1,062,079
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  342,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           248,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  968,570
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.07



</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-7322

MICHAEL J. POPE,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

Hugh D. Cox Jr. , Greenville, North Carolina, for claimant-appellant.

Martin F. Hockey, Jr. , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for re spondent-appellee. With him on the brief were Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, Deborah A. Bynum , Assistant Director, and David F. D’Alessandris , Attorney. Of counsel on the brief were David J. Barrans

, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Jamie L. Mueller , Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affair s, of Washington, DC.

Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Judge Bruce E. KasoldNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-7322

MICHAEL J. POPE,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United Stat es Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 02-1552, Judge Bruce E. Kasold.

__________ ________________ DECIDED: May 1, 2009

__________________________

Before GAJARSA, DYK, and MOORE, Circuit Judges

.

PER CURIAM.

Michael J. Pope appeals a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans

Claims (Veterans Court) affirming a Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision denying his

claims related to postoperative resi duals of a ventral hernia. See Pope v. Nicholson

, No. 02-1552, 2006 WL 1667039 (Vet. App. Apr. 25, 2006). Mr. Pope, relying on our

decision in Sanders v. Nicholson , 487 F.3d 881 (Fed. Cir. 2007), rev’d sub nom.

Shinseki v. Sanders , 556 U.S. ---, 2009 WL 1045952 (2009), asserts that the Veterans

Court erred by improperly assigning him t he burden of proving that a notice error under

38 U.S.C. § 5103 was prejudicial.2006-7322 2 Following Mr. Pope’s appeal, th e Supreme Court of the Un ited States reversed

our judgment in Sanders , holding that the burden of provi ng prejudicial error is properly

placed on the Veteran. See Shinseki v. Sanders , 2009 WL 1045952, at *8-9. In light of

the Supreme Court decision in Sanders , we affirm the Veterans Court.

COSTS

No costs.
IN RE: SKINNER

277A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 25, 2016

Ira Braswell, IV, Attorney at Law, for Skinner, Mark.

Jenna F. Butler, Attorney at Law, Alexander C. Dale, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, for Clark, Nancy Bass, et al.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 25th of October 2016 by Respondent:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of October 2016."

Respondent shall have up to and including the 28th day of November 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Order entered May 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-11-01272-CV

MICKEY TURNER, Appellant

V.

NICOLE ROBERSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 03-05790-Y

ORDER

Appellant Mickey Turner’s January 11, 2013 motion to render decision is DENIED as 

moot.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
Carole Uhlig (formerly Civitarese), Plaintiff, v. Joseph Civitarese, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA15-891

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

IN RE: No. 08-17-00161-CV

§

DISH NETWORK, L.L.C. AND 

ECHOSPHERE L.L.C.,

RELATORS.

§

§

§

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus against 

Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 243rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas, and concludes 

that Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted. We therefore direct 

the trial court to withdraw its order denying Relators’ motion to quash the deposition notice for 

Katherine Leyba and enter an order granting the motion to quash, in accordance with the opinion 

of this Court. If Real Party in Interest fails to file within thirty days from the date of this opinion 

a motion establishing she is entitled to pre-arbitration discovery pursuant to 

TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE ANN. § 171.086(a)(4) and (6) or fails to present evidence sufficient to 

entitle her to a Tipps evidentiary hearing, the trial court is ordered to summarily rule on the motion 

to compel arbitration. The motion to compel and arbitration and any reasonable discovery must 

be resolved without delay. The writ of mandamus will issue should the trial court fail to comply.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
# C_2009032EN.01002802.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/28

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 December 2008 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-339/06) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Common organisation of the market in wine - Aid for the restructuring and conversion of vineyards - Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 - Fixing of the definitive financial allocations made to Member States - Decision 2006/669/EC - Binding nature of the time-limit in Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 - Principles of cooperation in good faith, good faith and sound administration, proportionality and effectiveness)

(2009/C 32/52)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: I. Chalkias and S. Papaioannou, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe, M. Konstantinidis and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/669/EC of 4 October 2006 fixing, for the 2006 financial year and in respect of a certain number of hectares, the definitive financial allocations to Member States for the restructuring and conversion of vineyards under Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 (OJ 2006 L 275, p. 62)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I,  John A. Clarke, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of  Nevsun Resources Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.

/@/ John A. Clarke

Signature

March 23, 2006

Date

Chief Executive Officer, President

Title
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kitty Hawk, Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, Drew Keith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|         |   |      |
|--------------|--------|-----------|
| May 14, 2003 |   | By:  | /S/ DREW KEITH |
|         |   |      |  |
|         |   |      | **Drew Keith****Chief Financial Officer** |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. David Michael REED

365A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 21, 2016

Mr. Paul E. Smith, Attorney at Law, For Reed, David Michael.

Mr. E. Burke Haywood, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ms. Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, Ms. Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 18th of November 2016 by State of NC:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of November 2016."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 13th day of December 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# CE2004070EN.01008601.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/86

---

(2004/C 70 E/088)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2336/03

by Brian Simpson (PSE) to the Commission

(16 July 2003)

Subject:   Project ACCESS: Advance Communication for Cumbria and Enabling Sustainable Services

Subject:

Can the Commission give an indication of when it will be in a position to respond to the UK Government's submission in regard to the above project (under Article 86(3)) so that this excellent scheme can go ahead and enable the area of Cumbria to have access to broadband communications?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(14 August 2003)

(14 August 2003)

By letter dated 26 June 2003 the United Kingdom authorities notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty the measures referred to by the Honourable Member. However, the notification was considered incomplete and the Commission requested additional information by letter dated 17 July 2003.

According to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999/EC (1), the Commission shall take a decision on notified aid within two months, beginning on the day following the receipt of a complete notification. Additional information submitted by the United Kingdom authorities was received on 22 July 2003 and is currently examined by the Commission services. Thus, a decision shall be taken by 23 September 2003, unless further information is considered necessary to enable the Commission to define its position on the proposed measures.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, OJ L 83, 27.3.1999.

1

---
FORM 40-F CERTIFICATION

I,  Cliff T. Davis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of  Nevsun Resources Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e

)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f

)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.

/s/  Cliff T. Davis

Signature

March 24, 2008

Date

Chief Financial Officer

Title
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                       <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,251                  21,605
<SECURITIES>                                    62,263                  44,688
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,606                  16,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,043                   1,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,140                  91,077
<PP&E>                                         6,74368                   8,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,316                   2,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,368                  97,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,473                  11,823
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            21                      22
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,874                  86,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,368                  97,935
<SALES>                                         18,175                  15,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,175                  15,924
<CGS>                                            3,284                   2,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,284                   2,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,136                  26,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,565                (12,378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       781                      92
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,785                (12,470)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,785                (12,470)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13                  (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12                  (0.60)


</TABLE>