alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-02718 of Comcast UK Cable Partners Limited and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of
our report on Comcast UK Cable Partners Limited and subsidiaries dated February
28, 1997, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Comcast UK Cable
Partners Limited and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1996.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 1997


<PAGE>

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-02718 of Comcast UK Cable Partners Limited and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of
our report on Cambridge Holding Company Limited and subsidiaries dated February
29, 1996, incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Comcast UK Cable Partners Limited and subsidiaries for the year ended December
31, 1996.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 1997
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3865 

To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from modifying the standard for 

determining whether an organization is operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare for purposes of section 501(c)(4) of the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2014 

Mr. CAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from modifying 

the standard for determining whether an organization 

is operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare 

for purposes of section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Targeting of Po5 litical Beliefs by the IRS Act of 2014’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3865 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABLE STANDARD FOR DETERMINATIONS OF 

2 WHETHER AN ORGANIZATION IS OPERATED 

3 EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SO4 CIAL WELFARE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The standard and definitions as 

6 in effect on January 1, 2010, which are used to determine 

7 whether an organization is operated exclusively for the 

8 promotion of social welfare for purposes of section 

9 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall 

10 apply for purposes of determining the status of organiza11 tions under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue 

12 Code of 1986 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (b) PROHIBITION ON MODIFICATION OF STAND14 ARD.—The Secretary of the Treasury may not issue, re15 vise, or finalize any regulation (including the proposed 

16 regulations published at 78 Fed. Reg. 71535 (November 

17 29, 2013)), revenue ruling, or other guidance not limited 

18 to a particular taxpayer relating to the standard and defi19 nitions specified in subsection (a). 

20 (c) APPLICATION TO ORGANIZATIONS.—Except as 

21 provided in subsection (d), this section shall apply with 

22 respect to any organization claiming tax exempt status 

23 under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

24 1986 which was created on, before, or after the date of 

25 the enactment of this Act. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3865 IH

1 (d) SUNSET.—This section shall not apply after the 

2 one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Friday Investments, LLC v. Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc., et al.

248PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 1, 2017

Lisa G. Godfrey, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Peter R. Fenn, Attorney at Law, Ira H. Grolman, Attorney at Law, Stacy C. Cordes, Attorney at Law, for Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc., et al.

Keith B. Nichols, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Samuel S. Kohn, Attorney at Law, for Friday Investments, LLC.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 31st of January 2017 by Plaintiff:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of February 2017."

Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 23rd day of February 2017 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
AMENDMENT TO INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT AGREEMENT


EXHIBIT 10.7




AMENDMENT TO INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT TO INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT AGREEMENT is made this 24th day of June, 2014, effective October 2, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), by and between CONTINENTAL RAIL CORP., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and JOHN M. KEASLING, an individual (the “Consultant”).




R E C I T A L S




WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant are parties to that certain Independent Consultant Agreement dated October 2, 2013 (the “Consulting Agreement”).  




WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend certain terms of the Consulting Agreement effective as of the Effective Date as hereinafter set forth.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:




1.

Consulting Fees; Billing and Payment.  The section of the Consulting Agreement entitled “Consulting Fees; Billing and Payment” is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




Ÿ

Consulting Fees; Billing and Payment.  Beginning October 2, 2013 and thereafter the Company shall pay the Consultant a consulting fee at the rate of $5,000 per month for the performance of the Services.  As additional compensation for the Services, the Consultant shall be entitled to receive 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) on July 1, 2014 and, thereafter so long as this Agreement shall remain in effect, the Consultant shall be entitled to receive an additional 11,112 Shares per month which shall be issued following each quarterly period within 15 days after the end of the quarter. The Shares shall be valued at $0.45 per Share.  Consultant shall invoice the Company on a monthly basis with respect to consulting fees and out-of-pocket expenses for the prior month.  Out-of-pocket expenses include, but are not limited to, airfare, travel related expense such as parking, cabs and tolls, car rental, hotel and personal car allowance (based on IRS mileage reimbursement rate).  Also, pre-approved T&E expenses related to client entertainment.  The Company shall also reimburse Consultant for all of his actual, documented out-of-pocket expenses which have been pre-approved in writing by the Company.  Undisputed monetary compensation shall be due net 15 days from the date of receipt by the Company of Consultant’s invoice.






1












2.

Definitions; No Other Changes.  All terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as in the Consulting Agreement.  Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.




CONTINENTAL RAIL CORP.




By: /s/ John H. Marino, Jr.

John H. Marino, Jr., Chief Executive Officer







/s/ John M. Keasling

John M. Keasling






2
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Sidney
      L. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended
      October 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
      financial condition and results of operations of Chatsworth Data Solutions,
      Inc.




Date: December 21, 2007
            
            /s/ Sidney L. AndersonSidney
              L. AndersonChief
              Executive Officer and President






I,
      Clayton Woodrum, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of Chatsworth Data Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
      ended October 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
      the financial condition and results of operations of Chatsworth Data Solutions,
      Inc.


Date: December 21, 2007
              
              /s/ Clayton WoodrumClayton
                WoodrumChief
                Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Viewpoint
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, William H. Mitchell, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that based on my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report to which this certification
    is attached as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                            



| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ WILLIAM H. MITCHELL

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | William H. Mitchell    
| | Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 30, 2004
ORDER OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL

Order Pronounced October 8, 2008 

THE MOTION IN THE FOLLOWING MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CASE IS 

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART:

 

08-0142 IN RE DELTA LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY OF HOUSTON, 

TEXAS 

08-0208 IN RE HURRICANE RITA HOMEOWNERS’ CLAIMS 

08-0427 IN RE SOUTHEAST SURPLUS UNDERWRITERS GENERAL 

AGENCY, INC. 

 respondents’ motion to vacate order of appointment of pretrial judge 

granted in part and denied in part 

Per Curiam Opinion
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

      In connection with the Annual Report of Viewpoint Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay S. Amato, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

|        | (1) |      | The Report to which this certification is attached as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------------------------------------|-----|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        | (2) |      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                         |

      

      

      

| Dated: March 16, 2005           |                                  | By: | /s/ JAY S. AMATOJay S. AmatoPresident and Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-79074, 33-79142, 33-95774, 33-95780,
333-78883, and 333-3402) for Project Software & Development, Inc. of our report
dated November 3, 1999, except for Note O, which is dated December 15, 1999,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.





                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 1999
Keaton v. ERMC III, et al.

262P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

M. Duane Jones, Joseph D. Delfino, Attorneys at Law, Charlotte, For ERMC III, et al.

Shannon Warf Wilson, Attorney at Law, For Keaton, Ronald G. (Jr.).

Ervin, J.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of October 2016 by Defendants to Withdraw Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-57,269] 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Temple Inland, Antioch Division, Antioch, California. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. 

TA-W-57,269; Temple Inland, Antioch Division Antioch, California (September 8, 2005). 

Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of September 2005. 

Timothy Sullivan, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-18542 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL

On August 24, 2021, we sustained ASBCA No. 62494, and converted the default 

termination of appellant’s contract to a termination for the convenience of the 

government; we also denied ASBCA No. 62495 as moot. Iqrar Ahmed & Partner 

Contracting Co., ASBCA Nos. 62494, 62495, 21-1 BCA ¶ 37,923 at 184,183. Appellant 

subsequently applied for attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $13,537.50, pursuant 

to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504 (app. at 5). The government responds 

that it does not contest payment of that amount (gov’t resp. at 1). The application is 

granted in the amount of $13,537.50.

Dated: April 28, 2022

(Signatures continued)

TIMOTHY P. MCILMAIL

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

Application Under the Equal Access - )

 to Justice Act of - )

)

Iqrar Ahmed and Partner Contracting 

Company Ltd.

)

)

ASBCA Nos. 62494-EAJA, 62495-EAJA

)

Under Contract No. FA4911-20-P-M011 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: P. Sean Milani-nia, Esq.

 Fox Rothschild LLP

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.

 Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

Lt Col Matthew Ramage-White, USAF

 Trial Attorney

 
2

I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62494-EAJA, 62495-EAJA,

Appeal of Iqrar Ahmed and Partner Contracting Company Ltd., rendered in conformance 

with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 4, 2022

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
In the Matter of: J.F.G., Jr.

No. COA16-205

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14 Certification**I, Frank P. Vaughan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 10-K/A of The Cronos Group (the“Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment to annual report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis amendment to report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe Registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this amendment to report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: April 27, 2007/s/ FRANK P. VAUGHANFrank P. Vaughan
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2660
BILLY M. BLEDSOE, Petitioner, versusDIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (96-208-BLA) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 24, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy M. Bledsoe, Petitioner Pro Se. C. William Mangum, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Bledsoe v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs , No. 96-208-BLA (B.R.B. Oct. 31, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
State of North Carolina, upon the relation of Patrick L. McCrory, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina; James B. Hunt, Jr.; and James G. Martin v. Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate; Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; and, in their official capacities as members of the Coal Ash Management Commission, Harrell Jamison Auten III, Tim L. Bennett, D. Allen Hayes, Scott Flanagan, Rajaram Janardhanam, and Lisa D. Riegel

No. 113A15

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 28, 2016.

John R. Wester, Attorney at Law, David C. Wright, III, Attorney at Law, Andrew A. Kasper, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Robert C. Stephens, Jr., Chief Legal Counsel, Jonathan R. Harris, Associate General Counsel, for McCrory, Patrick L., Governor.

John H. Culver, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Philip E. Berger.

Brian C. Fork, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Berger, Philip E. (Pres. Pro Tem)

Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ann W. Matthews, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Coal Ash Management Commission.

Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Carolinas AGC, et al.

Robert F. Orr, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law.

E. Hardy Lewis, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Berry Cherie, et al.

Arch T. Allen, III, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Arch T. Allen, III.

*798Allegra Collins, Attorney at Law.

Matthew T. Houston, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Robert William Manoso, Attorney at Law, for Berger, Philip E., et al.

*ORDER*

Plaintiffs' petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of reversing the superior court's dismissal of plaintiffs' quo warranto claim, and remanding to the superior court for consideration of that claim on the merits.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 28thday of January, 2016.