alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Exhibit 21.1

# Subsidiaries of the
Registrant

# 

|Company                            | Ownership                                  | State of Incorporation
|---------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | ----------------------
|The State Bank                     | 100%                                       | Michigan              
|                                  
|Davison State Bank                 | 100%                                       | Michigan              
|                                  
|Community Bank Services, Inc.      | 100% by The State Bank                     | Michigan              
|                                  
|Fentura Mortgage Company           | 100% by The State Bank                     | Michigan              
|                                  
|West Michigan Community Bank       | 100%                                       | Michigan              
|                                  
|West Michigan Mortgage, LLC        | 99.5% by West Michigan Community Bank      | Michigan              
|                                   | 0.5% by Community Insurance Services, Inc.
|                                  
|Community Insurance Services, Inc. | 100% by West Michigan Community Bank       | Michigan
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Marine Mammal Commission

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Cottingham, Executive Director, Marine Mammal Commission, 4340 East-West Highway, Room 905, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-0087.

Dated: September 19, 2005.

David Cottingham,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 05-18950  Filed 9-19-05; 12:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-31-M
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.22

          [LETTERHEAD OF JAYHAWK ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION APPEARS HERE]


                               September 5, 1996




Mr. Jack T. Smith
1912 MacGregor
Plano, Texas 75093

     Re:   Consulting Agreement

Dear Jack:

     This confirms your agreement to provide business, financial and management 
consulting services and advice to Jayhawk Acceptance Corporation beyond the 
service and advice that might be anticipated from your duties as a director. You
will make available adequate time to perform such services to the satisfaction 
of Jayhawk. Jayhawk will provide you office space, equipment and supplies, as 
required when you perform your services at Jayhawk. You will be responsible for 
providing your own secretarial support.

     To encourage you to devote such time and attention as reasonably may be 
required by Jayhawk, Jayhawk will grant to you, under the terms of its 1994 
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, an option to purchase 100,000 shares of 
the common stock of Jayhawk. The option will become exercisable in increments of
25,000 shares, with the first 25,000 shares being immediately exercisable on the
date of grant and each subsequent increment of 25,000 shares becoming 
exercisable on each of the next three anniversaries of such date. If either you 
or Jayhawk terminate this Consulting Agreement for any reason, then the option 
will automatically terminate as to any shares which have not become exercisable 
as of the effective date of termination. You understand and agree that Jayhawk's
obligation to grant such option to you is contingent upon the approval of the 
Compensation Committee of Jayhawk's Board of Directors.  Jayhawk will seek such 
approval on or before the next scheduled meeting of the Compensation Committee.

     You agree to treat as confidential all confidential, proprietary and trade 
secret information of Jayhawk to which you may be exposed in providing services 
to Jayhawk. Either you or Jayhawk may terminate this Consulting Agreement at any
time upon 30 days advance written notice to the other party.

     If you are in agreement with the terms of this Agreement, then so indicate 
by signing this Consulting Agreement in the space provided below.

                                        Sincerely,

                                        Jayhawk Acceptance Corporation


                                        By: /s/ Mike Smartt
                                           -------------------------------------

                                           Mike Smartt, Chairman of the Board
                                           and Chief Executive Officer
Accepted and Agreed:


/s/ Jack T. Smith
------------------------------------
Jack T. Smith
THE FIDELITY BANK v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

No. 393PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 9, 2016.

Donalt J. Eglinton, Attorney at Law, New Bern, Alexander C. Dale, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, Amy P. Wang, Attorney at Law, New Bern, for The Fidelity Bank.

Perry J. Pelaez, Assistant Attorney General, for NC Department of Revenue.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 20th of October 2016 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
EXHIBIT 31: Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Ernest Clarke, certify that:

        1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A
(Amendment #1) of Ultradata Systems, Incorporated;

	2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

	3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial information included in this report fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

	4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

	a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

	b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

	c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

	5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

	a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

	b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  June 22, 2005                   /s/ Ernest S. Clarke
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Ernest Clarke, Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41164

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TERRANCE LAMICHAEL CANADY

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-45

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Terrance Lamichael

Canady has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Canady has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Eric Graham, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

August 16, 2016

**390ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion for the appointment of counsel and a hearing was held on that motion on April 4, 2016. Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best was appointed as counsel by order of the Honorable Roger E. Henderson. Subsequently, petitioner filed a motion for resentencing on June 9, 2016 pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Roger E. Henderson be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Henderson shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard *192as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Henderson shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

**391This order is effective *nunc pro tunc* April 4, 2016.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RONALD BACLAWSKI and JAMIE )

BACLAWSKI, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4026

)

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed May 29, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; Declan P. Mansfield, Judge.

Latasha Scott of Lord Scott, PLLC, 

Tampa, and Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law 

Firm, LLC, Tampa (withdrew after 

briefing), for Appellants. 

Shannon T. Sinai and Brandon S. Vesely 

of Albertelli Law, Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 10.17(e)



FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT (this Amendment) is made as of this 30th day of April, 2003 to that certain
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of November 30, 1999 (as heretofore amended, the Employment Agreement), by and between ROBERT HENSLEY (Employee) and JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (Employer).



FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy
of which are hereby acknowledged, Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement, hereby amend the Employment Agreement as follows:



1. Subject to earlier termination otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the last day of the Employment Period shall be January
31, 2005.



2. Effective March 3, 2003,
Employees Base Salary shall be $290,000.



Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the remainder of the
Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respective meanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed
a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.



|JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. |  |                         |  | 
|---------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|                            
|By:                          |  | /s/ ROBERT N.
WILDRICK  |  | 
|                             |  | Robert N. Wildrick      |  | 
|                             |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
----

(2004/C 84 E/0565)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2350/03

by Elspeth Attwooll (ELDR) to the Commission

(11 July 2003)

Subject:   Protection of the Darwin Mounds

Further to its reply to Written Question P-0213/03 (1) concerning the protection of the Darwin Mounds, will the Commission confirm whether it has been contacted by the UK Government with a request or with justification for the use of emergency powers by the Commission as provided by Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 (2) in respect of this area? If so, will the Commission also confirm the date on which this approach was first made by the UK Government, given the implication that this had not occurred at the time of the Commission's response to Question P-0213/03?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(4 August 2003)

The Commission can confirm that it has been contacted by United Kingdom authorities about the protection of the Darwin Mounds further to its reply to Written Question P-0213/03.

The United Kingdom authorities put the issue to Directorate General Fisheries in March 2003 and asked about the possibility of emergency measures. On 24 June 2003, the Commission received a letter from the United Kingdom authorities asking it to take action to close the Darwin Mounds to methods of fishing likely to cause further irreparable damage to them. The Mounds already show signs of damage caused by bottom trawling. As fishing of the kind is still taking place in the area, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs asks the Commission to consider its emergency powers under Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy, to address the problem immediately.

Our services have already started to prepare a proposal for a Council Regulation to prohibit the use of bottom trawls and other towed gear in the Darwin Mounds. This will be done by way of an amendment to Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 of 30 March 1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms (3) and, therefore, the Parliament will be duly consulted.

As far as the emergency procedure is concerned, we are now considering whether this case meets the requirements of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002. If there is a case for using such procedure the Commission will swiftly adopt legislation similar to the one mentioned above, which will be valid for six months and which can be extended for another six months.

----

(1)OJ C 161 E, 10.7.2003, p. 195.

(2)OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 59.

(3)OJ L 125, 27.4.1998.

----
501 S.E.2d 449

#### Paul Michael DALTON, Jr., Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 3134-96-3.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

July 7, 1998.

Present: FITZPATRICK, C.J., BAKER, BENTON, COLEMAN, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY, ANNUNZIATA, OVERTON and BUMGARDNER, JJ., and COLE, DUFF and HODGES, Senior Judges.

UPON A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On June 2, 1998 came the appellee, by counsel, and filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on May 19, 1998, and grant a rehearing en banc thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing en banc is granted, the mandate entered herein on May 19, 1998 is stayed pending the decision of the Court en banc, and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. It is further ordered that the appellee shall file with the clerk of this Court ten additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             633,305
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   722,619
<PP&E>                                           6,925,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                     323,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,696,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,735,840
<BONDS>                                          5,392,052
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              1
<COMMON>                                             4,435
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,138,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,696,548
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,095,489
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,892,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,626,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 579,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (797,430)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,423,616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1,925,995)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,349,611) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (2.30) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (2.30) 
        


</TABLE>
# C_2010288EN.01006502.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/65

---

Order of the General Court of 1 September 2010 — Universal v Commission

(Case T-34/06) (1)

()

(2010/C 288/117)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.

---
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Inn of the Mountain Gods Resortand Casino (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Companyon Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2007 (the “***Report***”) that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.      Date: September 14, 2007 By /s/ Brian D. Parrish           Name: Brian D. Parrish    Its: Chief Operating Officer (Principal Executive Officer)       Date: September 14, 2007 By  /s/ Pamela Gallegos           Name: Pamela Gallegos     Its: Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)       The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) andis not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Viewpoint
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Anthony L. Pane, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my
knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report to which this certification
    is attached as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                            



| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ ANTHONY L. PANE

| |                          
| | -------------------------
| |                          
| | Anthony L. Pane          
| | Senior Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer  

Dated: March 31, 2003