alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joseph Paul Hudgins, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

July 18, 2016

*67ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on June 23, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Donald B. Hocker be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's *68Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Hocker shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Hocker shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0337. JAY FRANCIS SPRINGS v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE

SERVICES, LLC.

After this dispossessory proceeding was transferred from magistrate court to

superior court, the superior court issued a writ of possession in favor of the plaintiff

and dismissed the defendants’ counterclaims in an order entered on July 30, 2024. On

August 27, 2024, defendant Jay Springs filed a notice of appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

While a notice of appeal generally may be filed within 30 days of entry of the

order sought to be appealed, appeals in dispossessory actions must be filed within 7

days of the date the judgment was entered. See OCGA § 44-7-56 (b) (1); Radio Sandy

Springs v. Allen Road Joint Venture, 311 Ga. App. 334, 335-336 (715 SE2d 752) (2011).

The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer

appellate jurisdiction on this Court. Perlman v.Perlman, 318 Ga.App. 731, 739 (4) (734

SE2d 560) (2012). Springs’s notice of appeal was untimely filed 28 days after the July

30 judgment he seeks to appeal. Consequently, this untimely appeal is hereby

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 30, 2024

09/30/2024
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135928 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 135928 

 COA: 281400 
 Wayne CC: 06-018424-01

GREG FALK, a/k/a GREG SCHOENLIEN, a/k/a 

GREG BEDDOW, a/k/a GREG SCHOELEIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Chief Executive
OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Micrel, Incorporated (the Company) hereby certifies,
to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the
Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|Date: August 8, 2007 | By | /s/ Raymond D. Zinn          
|-------------------- | -- | -----------------------------
|                     |    | Raymond D. Zinn              
|                     |    | Chief Executive
      Officer

Certification of Chief Financial
OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Micrel, Incorporated (the Company) hereby certifies,
to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the
Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|Date: August 8, 2007 | By | /s/ Richard D. Crowley, Jr.  
|-------------------- | -- | -----------------------------
|                     |    | Richard D. Crowley,
      Jr.
|                     |    | Chief Financial
      Officer

34

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                     CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Fiscal year ended January 31,
----------------------                          -------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands)                           2001(2)        2000           1999        1998         1997
----------------------                          ---------     --------       --------    --------     -------
<S>                                             <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings before fixed charges:
      Income (loss) before income taxes and
        extraordinary item                      $(205,264)    $(47,460)    $124,097     $ 76,640     $36,710
      Fixed charges                             $ 102,940       92,389       68,843       35,325      19,840
                                                ---------     --------     --------     --------     -------
                                                $(102,324)    $ 44,929     $192,940     $111,965     $56,550
                                                =========     ========     ========     ========     =======

Fixed charges:
      Interest expense                          $  69,762     $ 63,283     $ 43,453     $ 16,914     $ 9,877
      Interest component of rent expense(1)     $  33,178       29,106       25,390       18,411       9,963
                                                ---------     --------     --------     --------     -------
                                                $ 102,940     $ 92,389     $ 68,843     $ 35,325     $19,840
                                                =========     ========     ========     ========     =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   (1.0)x        0.5x         2.8x         3.2x        2.9x
                                                =========     ========     ========     ========     =======
</TABLE>

--------------
(1) Calculated as one-third of total rent expense.

(2) Earnings are insufficient to cover fixed charges for the year ended January
    31, 2001 by $205.3 million.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 7, 2008



|                                                                    |  |  |  |                                                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dennis M. Oates                                                 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard M. Ubinger                                                                                       
|Dennis M. Oates                                                     |  |  |  | Richard M. Ubinger                                                                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) |  |  |  | Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63**

**of Title18 of the United States Code**

 

I, Michael T.Willis, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of Westaff, Inc.(the “Company”), that, to the best of my knowledge;

 

(1)                                  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Qfor the period ended April 19, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date:       June 9, 2008

 

 
| By:                                        | /s/ Michael T. Willis |   |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Michael T. Willis                          |                  |   |
| *President, Chief Executive  Officer, and* |                  |   |
| *acting principal financial  officer**     |                  |   |

 

* Mr. Willis is alsoacting as the Registrant’s principal financial officer as of the date of thisfiling.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by § 906 has been provided to Westaff, Inc. andwill be retained by Westaff, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7602

LONNELL DAVID SLIGH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK CONROY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-99-1218-WMN)

Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lonnell David Sligh, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Jason Trumpbour, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lonnell David Sligh appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Sligh v. Conroy, No. CA-99-1218-WMN (D. Md.

Sept. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1997 
<CASH>                                                          254,427 
<SECURITIES>                                                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0 
<INVENTORY>                                                           0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                254,427 
<PP&E>                                                                0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               20,452,852 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           654,853 
<BONDS>                                                      15,166,177 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         3,389,487 
<PREFERRED>                                                           0 
<COMMON>                                                            355 
<OTHER-SE>                                                      741,710 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 20,452,852 
<SALES>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0 
<CGS>                                                                 0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 87,607 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            1,987,562 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (2,075,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (500,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (2,575,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0 
<CHANGES>                                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (2,575,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (.74)
        

</TABLE>
497 S.E.2d 889

#### Welford V. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 0230-96-2.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

April 14, 1998.

Before the Full Court

*153UPON A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On March 10, 1998 came the appellee, by counsel, and. filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on February 24, 1998, and grant a rehearing en banc thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing en banc is granted, the mandate entered herein on February 24, 1998 is stayed pending the decision of the Court en banc, and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. It is further ordered that the appellee shall file with the clerk of this Court ten additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
# C_2008171EN.01002903.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 28 November 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social no 3 Valladolid, Spain) — Vicente Pascual García v Confederación Hidrográfica del Duero

o

(Case C-87/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 171/47)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. William Edward GODWIN, III

No. 167PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, For Godwin, William Edward (III).

Teresa L. Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 23rd of May 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.14

                  July 1 - December 31, 1997 Compensation Plan
                             Jethro J. Felton, III
                      Vice President  North American Sales


COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES
    1.  Provide overall compensation that is competitive within the industry for
        the job position and responsibilities.
    2.  Provide motivation to meet and exceed quantitative and qualitative goals
        for the development and management of the North American sales force.
    3.  Ensure management of the North American sales force in a way that is
        fully compatible with and in support of, the Company's overall goals,
        especially attainment of quota objectives at specified expense levels.

TARGET COMPENSATION LEVEL AT PLAN
       Compensation at plan is $115,000 for the six-month period, with the
opportunity for increased payout above that level based upon performance as
described below.

PLAN DESCRIPTION
     The plan will operate with a base salary of $60,000 for the six-month
period (paid semi-monthly).  In addition to the base salary, there will be
override bonus payments.  Quarterly override bonus payments will be determined
in accordance with the plan and paid upon completion of the quarter's closing,
allowing reasonable time for administration.  The override bonus payments will
have no fixed upper limit.  At target, the override bonus payments would total
$55,000.

PLAN OPERATION
     Quantitative Incentive Payments: The override percentage is 0.3642% per
dollar of revenue.  At target, the revenue from North American sales is as
follows:

          Q3'97    $ 6,700,000
          Q4'97    $ 8,400,000
                   -----------
          Total    $15,100,000
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2063
FLOYD BRUCE MOBLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; JAMES J. BLOUNT, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00139-JBF) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Floyd Bruce Mobley, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Brody Rashkind, FURNISS, DAVIS, RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Floyd Bruce Mobley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mobley v. City of Chesapeake , No. 2:06-cv-00139-JBF (E.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                 ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual Report of Trans Energy,  Inc. (the Company )
on Form  10-KSB/A for the period  ending  December  31, 2005,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, William
F. Woodburn,  Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   WILLIAM F. WOODBURN
-------------------------------------
William F. Woodburn
Principal Accounting Officer
June 21, 2006



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's   Form   10-KSB/A   solely   pursuant   to  section  906  of  the
     Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002  (subsections  (a) and  (b) of  section  1350,
     chapter 63 of title 18,  United States Code) and is not being filed as part
     of the Form 10-KSB/A or as a separate disclosure document.