alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008223EN.01004102.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/41

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 July 2008 — Complejo Agrícola v Commission

(Case T-345/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Decision 2006/613/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region - Challengeable act - Lack of direct effect - Inadmissible)

(2008/C 223/70)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Complejo Agrícola S.A. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Menéndez Menéndez and G. Yanguas Montero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and D. Recchia, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, abogado del Estado)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Partial annulment of Article 1 of, and Annex 1 to, Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of 19 July 2006 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2006 L 259, p. 1), in so far as it declares the site designated as ‘Acebuchales de la Campiña sur de Cádiz’, which includes a farm belonging to the applicant, to be a site of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | Complejo Agrícola S.A. is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Complejo Agrícola S.A. is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission;

| 3. | The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW144552] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW144552 from Chris S. Glade for lands in Natrona County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee                           ( print page 54769)                        has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW144552 effective April 1, 2004, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

Pamela J. Lewis, 

Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 05-18459 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF V.V.G.,

A CHILD.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-08-00171-CV

Appeal from

383rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2005AG2252)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination whether the appeal

should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion

for extension of time, we dismiss the appeal.

Appellant, Sergio Garcia, failed to file his brief on the due date, July 5, 2008. On July 16,

2008, the Clerk of the Court sent a notice advising the parties that Appellant had not filed his brief

or motion for extension of time. Further, the notice advised the parties of the Court’s intent to

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless one of the parties responded showing grounds to

continue the appeal. No response has been received as of this date. This Court possesses the

authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant has failed to file his brief

in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for such failure. TEX.R.APP.P.

38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no

writ). Because Appellant failed to file his brief and has not responded to our inquiry, we dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), and 42.3(c).
September 24, 2008 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.
Angelo Ham, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

August 16, 2016

**388ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion for the appointment of counsel and a hearing was held on that motion on April 4, 2016. Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best was appointed as counsel by order of the Honorable Roger E. Henderson. Subsequently, petitioner filed a motion for resentencing on June 8, 2016 pursuant to **389Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Roger E. Henderson be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Henderson shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Henderson shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

This order is effective *nunc pro tunc* April 4, 2016.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3872 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3872

    To amend title 23, United States Code, to reauthorize the State 
                      infrastructure bank program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2014

  Mr. Hanna (for himself and Ms. Hahn) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 23, United States Code, to reauthorize the State 
                      infrastructure bank program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Transportation and 
Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act (STIFIA)''.

SEC. 2. STATE INFRASTRUCTURE BANK PROGRAM.

    Section 610 of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (A) 
                and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) 15 percent of the funds apportioned to the 
                State for each of fiscal years 2013 and 2014 under each 
                of sections 104(b)(1) and 104(b)(2); and'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``2005 through 
                2009'' and inserting ``2013 and 2014'';
                    (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ``2005 through 
                2009'' and inserting ``2013 and 2014''; and
                    (D) in paragraph (5), by striking ``section 
                133(d)(3)'' and inserting ``section 133(d)(4)''; and
            (2) in subsection (k), by striking ``2005 through 2009'' 
        and inserting ``2013 and 2014''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a) Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Michael T. Willis, certify that:

 

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Westaff, Inc. (the “registrant”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

Date:  November 20,2008

 

 
|  /s/  Michael T. Willis           |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael T. Willis                      |   |
| Westaff, Inc.                     |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |   |

 

----
# C_2008142EN.01003702.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/37

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 April 2008 — PTV v OHIM (MAP&GUIDE The Mapware Company)

(Case T-226/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 142/68)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 11.10.2006.

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136843 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136843 

 COA: 283689 

Berrien CC: 2006-405518-FH 

CHARLES DEANTHONY GRAYS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 19, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 

Cause No. B180386: Rahim Jabbar v. Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and Tom

Wyche; in the 60th Judicial District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Cause No. 48124: Belinda and David Roggenkamp v. Standard Guaranty Insurance

Company and Roland Almarez and Fred Davis; in the 356th Judicial District Court of

Hardin County, Texas

Cause No. A180349: Duggie Southern v. American Bankers Insurance Company of

Florida, Financial Insurance Exchange and Timothy Hartsell; in the 58th Judicial District

Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Cause No. 28,547: Larry Scott v. American Security Insurance and Thomas Lee

Bashioum; in the 1st Judicial District Court of Jasper County, Texas

Cause No. B177901: Richmond O. Bennett, III as Representative of the Estate of

Richmond O. Bennett, deceased v. Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company, Southwest

Adjusters of Texas, LLC, Kyle Albright and Dixie Stewart; in the 60th Judicial District

Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Cause No. A-179-691: Herbert Carmon and Martha Carmon v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s,

London and Cunningham Lindsey Claims Management, Inc., in the 58th Judicial District

Court of Jefferson County, Texas
In the Matter of the FORECLOSURE OF A DEED OF TRUST EXECUTED BY Geddie HERRING dated November 20, 2003 and Recorded in Book 10614 at Page 913 in the Wake County Public Registry, North Carolina.

No. COA14-1159.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Sept. 1, 2015.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINON**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         170,448
<SECURITIES>                                     1,180
<RECEIVABLES>                                  252,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               427,569
<PP&E>                                          64,529
<DEPRECIATION>                                (30,520)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 471,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,852
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           153
<OTHER-SE>                                     289,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   471,578
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               449,895
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  270,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,392
<INCOME-TAX>                                       850
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,542
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,542
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)/RULE 15D-14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED I, David C. Mahoney, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Applix, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    [Not applicable.]c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. /s/ David C. MahoneyDate: May 16, 2005
    
    David C. MahoneyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3806 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3806

To authorize payment of funds in accordance with the agreement entered 
 into by the Tennessee Valley Authority, the State of North Carolina, 
 Swain County, North Carolina, and the United States Department of the 
                               Interior.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 23, 2013

 Mr. Meadows introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize payment of funds in accordance with the agreement entered 
 into by the Tennessee Valley Authority, the State of North Carolina, 
 Swain County, North Carolina, and the United States Department of the 
                               Interior.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Great Smoky Mountains National Park 
Agreement Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION.

    From funds previously appropriated to the National Park Service in 
the construction account for that agency in the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public Law 112-74), the National Park Service 
shall expend $4,000,000 for payment consistent with the Memorandum of 
Agreement entered into by the Tennessee Valley Authority, the State of 
North Carolina, Swain County, North Carolina, and the United States 
Department of the Interior, dated February, 2010, that supersedes the 
agreement of July 30, 1943 (relating to the construction of the North 
Shore Road from the eastern boundary of Great Smoky Mountains National 
Park).
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Michelle Gerard LYTLE.

No. COA15-1215.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 17, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
# C_2008022EN.01003902.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/39

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 November 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-145/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 22/70)

Language of the case: Swedish

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.

1

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

444444444444444444444444444

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

444444444444444444444444444

NO. 03-06-00393-CV

Strata Resources, a Texas Partnership; Steven Bland Epps; and

Charles W. Brandes, Individually, Appellants

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GV-01-003566, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

S U P P L E M E N T A L O P I N I O N

The State has filed a motion for rehearing, which we overrule. Conditioned upon our

overruling its motion with regard to attorney’s fees, the State, in an attempt to cure the reversible

error, has voluntarily remitted $7,200 of the $7,500 in attorney’s fees awarded in the district court’s

judgment against Epps, and the entire amount of $7,500 in fees awarded against Strata. See

Tex. R. App. P. 46.5. Appellants do not oppose this remittitur. We accept the State’s remittitur.

Accordingly, we withdraw our judgment dated July 11, 2008, and render judgment (1) that the

district court’s judgment awarding the State reimbursement from Epps for well-plugging costs is

reversed and that the State take nothing on those claims; (2) that the district court’s judgment is
2

reformed to award the State $300 in attorney’sfees against Epps and no attorney’sfees against Strata

and, as so reformed, is affirmed; and (3) that the district court’s judgment is otherwise affirmed.

_____________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Affirmed in part; Reformed in part and, as Reformed, Affirmed; Reversed and Rendered in part

Filed: September 17, 2008