alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137173(64)(65) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

CHRISTOPHER P. MARTIN, ANNA

McCOY, RICHARD M. HARRIS, and 

J. RICHARD ERNST,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 137173 

 COA: 286015 

SECRETARY OF STATE, DIRECTOR

OF ELECTIONS, and BOARD OF 

STATE CANVASSERS, 

Defendants, 

Ingham CC: 08-000752-PZ 

and 

WILLIAM F. MYLES,

 Proposed Intervenor, 

and 

RONALD M. BERGERON,

 Proposed Intervenor-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 4, 2008 order is considered, 

and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. 

While under ordinary circumstances, this Court might have ordered the trial court to 

allow the proposed intervenor-appellant to intervene and then remanded for further 

proceedings, after which the intervenor-appellant would have been able to appeal an 

adverse trial court ruling on the merits, under the instant emergency circumstances, we 

believe that it was necessary to address both of these matters in the same order. 

CAVANAGH and WEAVER, JJ., would grant reconsideration for the reasons set 

forth in Justice Cavanagh’s September 4, 2008 concurring and dissenting statement in 

this case. 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2

 KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration for the reasons set forth in her September 

4, 2008 dissenting statement in this case. 

d0908 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 8, 2008 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 183 (Thursday, September 22, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 55533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2005-21448; Airspace Docket No. 05-AAL-16]


Establishment of Class E Airspace; Golovin, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error in the airspace description 
contained in a Final Rule that was published in the Federal Register on 
Tuesday, September 13, 2005 (70 FR 53917). Airspace Docket No. 05-AAL-
16.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, December 22, 2005

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Rolf, AAL-538G, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587; 
telephone number (907) 271-5898; fax: (907) 271-2850; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e186809398cf829593cf938e8d87a1878080cf868e97"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="563137242f783522247824393a301630373778313920">[email protected]</span></a>. Internet address: http://www.alaska.faa.gov/at.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    Federal Register Document 05-18155, Airspace Docket No. 05-AAL-16, 
published on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 (70 FR 53917), established 
Class E airspace at Golovin, AK. An error was discovered in the 
airspace description that misidentified the airfield location. This 
action corrects that error.

Correction to Final Rule

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the airspace 
description of the Class E airspace published in the Federal Register, 
Tuesday, September 13, 2005 (70 FR 53917), (FR Doc 05-18155, page 
53918, column 1) is corrected as follows:

PART 71--[AMENDED]


Sec.  71.1  [Corrected]

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Golovin, AK [Corrected]

Golovin Airport, AK
    (Lat. 64[deg]33'02'' N., Long. 163[deg]00'26'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface 
within a 7.4-mile radius of the Golovin Airport, and that airspace 
extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within a 30-mile 
radius of Lat. 64[deg]43'47'' N., Long. 163[deg]15'17'' W and a 30-
mile radius of Lat. 64[deg]17'57'' N., Long. 163[deg]01'41'' W.
* * * * *

    Issued in Anchorage, AK, on September 14, 2005.
Michael A. Tarr,
Acting Area Director, Alaska Flight Service Operations.
[FR Doc. 05-18932 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-920-1310-01; WYW 144663]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW144663 from Crown 
Oil & Gas Co., Inc. for lands in Sublette County, Wyoming. The petition 
was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the 
date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. 
Lewis, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease WYW144663 effective April 1, 2004, under the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the 
lands.

Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 05-18460 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Nevsun Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cliff T. Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Cliff T. Davis

Cliff T. Davis

Chief Executive Officer



March 31, 2011
Order entered April 11, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00360

- CR

DEMOND DEPREE BLUNTS ON, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 49t h District Court Webb County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012CRO000674D1



### O RDER

We REINSTATE this appeal. We abated this appeal on appellant’s October 15 , 2018 motion and ordered a hearing on the status of portion s of the reporter’s record. Despite seve ral letters, emails, and phone calls, to date no hearing has been held , and we have no findings from the trial court

. Nevertheless, c ourt reporter Cynthia Perez Lenz has copied the Court on her correspondence with appella nt’s counsel regarding h er concer ns about the reporter’s record

. Specifically, she confirmed :

 no record exists of the chambers conference attended by the parties and referenced at volume 5, pages 6

- 7 of the reporter’s record;

 no record exists of the a discussion between the trial court and appellant referenced at volume 8, pages 4

- 5 of the reporter’s record; no record exists of the chambers conference held on April 20, 2016, referred to at the charge conference held in open court later that same day and referenced at volume 1, page 4 of the supplemental reporter’ s record ;

 the matters transcribed at 40 RR 37

- 38 are accurate;

 the location of the matters transcribed between counsel and the court mentioned at 21 RR 5

- 6 was in open court;

 volume 39, page 132, lines 2

- 3 were inaccurate and have been corrected. An amended volume 39 has been filed; and

 several exhibits were missing from the Master Index, volume 1. An amended volume 1 has been filed. In addition, Ms. Lenz has filed State’s exhibit 6, parts 4 and 5 ; State’s exhibit 40, parts

4 and 5 ; State’s exhibit 4, and State’s exhibit 293, part 2. Although Ms. Lenz attempted to file State’s exhibit 293, part 1 , and State’s exhibit 222, these CDs were in fact blank when

submitted to the Court.

We STRIKE volumes 1 and 39 of the report er’ s record filed May 29, 2018.

W e ORD E R court reporter Cynthia Lenz to file true and correct copies of the

State’s exhibit 293, part 1, and State’s exhibit 222 within FIFTEEN DAYS OF THE

DATE OF THIS ORDER. We caution Ms. Lenz that the failure to do so w ill result in this Court taking whatever remedies it has available to ensure the appeal proceeds in a more timely fashion, including ordering she not sit until the exhibits are filed. Appellant’s brief is DUE FORTY

- FIVE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS

ORDER.

W e DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable J ose Lopez , Presiding Judge, 49th District Court ; to Cynthia Perez Lenz , official court reporter , 49th DistrictCourt ; and to all counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
February 20 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals FRANKIE RAYSHAWN HIL L - TURNER , Appellant NO. 14 - 12 - 00971 - CR NO. 14 - 12 - 01011 - CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED . We further order this decision certified below for ob servance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RENAL CARE GROUP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          47,624
<SECURITIES>                                     5,814
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,703
<INVENTORY>                                      2,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,478
<PP&E>                                          38,790
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,016
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,812
<SALES>                                        129,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,518
<CGS>                                           90,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,446
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (619)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,704
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,958
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3860 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3860

 To revise the formula for allocating funding to States under the Low-
               Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2014

    Mr. Reed (for himself, Mr. Michaud, Mr. Gibson, and Mr. Rahall) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and 
   the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise the formula for allocating funding to States under the Low-
               Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Low Income Heating Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIHEAP STATE ALLOCATION FORMULA.

    Section 2604(a)(2) of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 
1981 (42 U.S.C. 8623(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), a State's allotment percentage 
is the percentage which that State would have received under this 
section as enacted in Public Law 97-35.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2008 – Hospital Consulting and Others v Esaote and Others**

**(Case C‐386/07)**

Rules of procedure – Articles 92(1) and 104(3) – Community competition rules – National rules concerning lawyers’ fees – Setting of professional scales of charges – Partial inadmissibility – Answers to questions which may be deduced from the case-law of the Court

1.                     *Competition – Community rules – Obligations of the Member States – Legislation intended to reinforce the effects of pre-existing
agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Meaning (Arts 10 EC, 81 EC and 82 EC) (see paras 18-27, operative part 1)*

2.                     *Preliminary rulings – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient explanation of the factual and legislative context
– Questions referred in a context making a useful answer impossible – Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 234 EC) (see paras 29-35,
operative part 2)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consiglio di Stato – Interpretation of Articles 10 and 81(1) EC and Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained (OJ 1998 L 77, p. 36) – Fixing by a national professional organisation of mandatory tariffs for lawyers’ services subject to ministerial approval – National rules prohibiting judges in decisions on costs from derogating from the set minimum fees. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Articles 10 EC and 81 EC do not preclude a national law which in principle prohibits derogation from minimum fees approved by ministerial decree, on the basis of a draft drawn up by a professional body of lawyers such as the Consiglia nazionale forense, and which also prohibits the court, when it decides the amount of costs that the unsuccessful party must pay to the other party, from derogating from those minimum fees. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | The third question referred by the Consiglio di Stato by decision of 13 January 2006 is manifestly inadmissible. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           1,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      322
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,489
<PP&E>                                             939
<DEPRECIATION>                                     344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                         470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,181
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,129
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    455
<INCOME-TAX>                                       182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                273
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       273
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
# C_2008022EN.01005503.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/55

---

Action brought on 28 September 2007 — Bernard v Europol

(Case F-99/07)

(2008/C 22/107)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Marjorie Bernard (Woerden, Netherlands) (represented by: P. de Casparis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 26 June 2007, notified on 28 June 2007, concerning the complaint, and the assessments of 5 February 2007 and 25 July 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 26 June 2007, notified on 28 June 2007, concerning the complaint, and the assessments of 5 February 2007 and 25 July 2007;

| — | Order Europol:






  — | to grant the applicant an increase in monthly salary with effect from 1 September 2006, together with interest; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Order Europol:

—

to grant the applicant an increase in monthly salary with effect from 1 September 2006, together with interest;

| — | to pay damages in the amount of EUR 7 500 net; |
| --- | --- |

—

to pay damages in the amount of EUR 7 500 net;

| — | Order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Europol to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present proceedings relate to the assessment of the applicant's work during the period from 1 September 2005 to 31 August 2006. The applicant's work was assessed as a ‘2’, which corresponds to the criterion ‘does not entirely meet the standard required’.

The applicant made a complaint concerning the assessment and the lack of any decision regarding the award of an increase in monthly salary and, in that context, she relied on the assessment guidelines in force in Europol. The applicant submits that the assessment is manifestly incorrect.

The applicant submits in particular that her complaints were declared unfounded by a decision of 26 June 2007 and alleges breach of the principle of the duty to state reasons since no reasons were stated for that decision. Nevertheless, the Director of Europol points out that the assessment was withdrawn and that a fresh assessment was to be made. That assessment took place on 25 July 2007.

The present action therefore relates to the decision made on the complaint and the assessment of 25 July 2007.

---
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of theundersigned officers of Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. (the "Company"), doeshereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that: 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended January 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fullycomplies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Dated: March 16, 2009 

/s/ J.L. Guerra, Jr.                  J.L. Guerra, Jr. Chief Executive Officer Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. 

Dated: March 16, 2009 

/s/Rakesh Malhotra             Rakesh Malhotra, C.A., Chief Financial Officer Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. and will beretained by Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted      pursuant **

**to      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **

| (i)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of                1934:and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (ii)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Louis              S.              Slaughter                                               |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Name:                Louis S. SlaughterChief                Executive Officer Date: August                21, 2006 |   |   |        |

----