alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                     UNIVERSAL AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                     ---------------------------     -------------------------
                                                        1997            1996           1997           1996
                                                        ----            ----           ----           ----
<S>                                               <C>             <C>             <C>            <C>
PRIMARY NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Net Income (Loss)                                    $   328,976     $   700,984    $  (164,767)   $   395,817
                                                      ----------     -----------     ----------    -----------
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding             6,738,656       6,594,207      6,734,041      6,566,280
Options and warrants assumed to be Common Stock
  equivalents using Treasury Stock Method                 28,145         509,326              0        521,281
                                                      ----------     -----------     ----------    -----------
Weighted average Common Shares
  outstanding, as adjusted                             6,766,801       7,103,033      6,734,041      7,087,581
                                                      ----------     -----------     ----------    -----------
Primary Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share                 $0.05           $0.10         ($0.02)         $0.06
                                                      ----------     -----------     ----------    -----------

FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Net Income (Loss)                                    $   328,976     $   700,984      ($164,767)   $   395,817
                                                      ----------     -----------     ----------    -----------
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding             6,738,656       6,594,207      6,734,041      6,566,280
Options and warrants assumed to be Common Stock
  equivalents using Treasury Stock Method                 38,551         654,149              0        598,639
                                                      ----------     -----------     ----------    -----------
Weighted average common shares outstanding, as
  adjusted                                             6,777,207       7,248,356      6,734,041      7,164,919
                                                      ----------     -----------     ----------    -----------
Fully Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Common Share           $0.05           $0.10         ($0.02)         $0.06
                                                      ----------     -----------     ----------    -----------
</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00303-CR

Marcus Layne Dickey

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

299th District Court of Travis County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-1-DC-15-904016

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 21, 2016
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0455 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KEITH STACY LEONARD ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 10 2022

11/10/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0455
STATE of North Carolina v. Nisandro Conzelez SANCHEZ.

No. COA14-1381.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 6, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Torrey S. Young, Employee, Plaintiff v. Lowes Home Center, Inc., Employer; Self-insured (Sedgwick CMS, Third-Party Administrator), Defendant

No. COA15-1077

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,060
<PP&E>                                          24,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,868
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,914
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,355
<SALES>                                        147,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,992
<CGS>                                          139,483
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,162)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,665)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,497)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,497)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.95)


</TABLE>
In the Matter of P.S.

No. COA15-449.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
State v. Thomas Craig Campbell

252PA14-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2016

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, Hannah H. Love, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Campbell, Thomas Craig.

Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, Mike Miller, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 11th of August 2016 by Defendant's:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of August 2016."

Defendant's shall have up to and including the 29th day of August 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
**Exhibit
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Linda
      Putback-Bean, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of
      Pediatric Prosthetics, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March
      31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Pediatric Prosthetics, Inc.





*By:/s/
      Linda Putback-Bean*


Linda
      Putback-Bean


Chief
      Executive Officer





May
      15,
      2007
**Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 December 2007 – Agenzia Dogane Circoscrizione Doganale di Genova v Euricom**

**(Case C‐505/06)**

First paragraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure – Community Customs Code – Inward processing – Association Agreement – Prior export of rice to a non‐member country bound by a preferential customs agreement – Article 216 of the Customs Code

Customs union – Customs debt arising where preferential tariff treatment obtained in a non-member country (Council Regulation No 2913/92,
Arts 115(1)(b) and 216) (see para. 26, operative part)

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| Reference for a preliminary ruling – Commissione tributaria regionale di Genova – Interpretation of Article 114, Article 115(1) and (3) and Article 216 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) – Rice exported under inward processing arrangements to a third country with which there is an agreement for preferential customs treatment. |

**Operative part**

Article 216 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended
by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000, is applicable to the inward
processing operations referred to in Article 115(1)(b) of that regulation in which compensating products have been exported
from the Community before importation of the import goods.
STATE of North Carolina v. James Anthony BARNETT, Jr.

No. 36PA16.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 2016.

Brendan O'Donnell, for Barnett, James Anthony (Jr.).

Jennifer Harjo, Wilmington, for Barnett, James Anthony (Jr.).

Iain M. Stauffer, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Craig Blitzer, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*AMENDED ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th of February 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> *475"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of February 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sustainable Environmental Technologies Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Glaser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:




The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  February 15, 2011


By:
/s/ Robert GlaserRobert GlaserChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  SUBSIDIARIES

The Company's principal wholly owned subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 were as
follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPANY                                    COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION             PRINCIPAL ACTIVITY
<S>                                        <C>                                  <C>
Cronos Containers Limited*                 UK                                   Container leasing,  management and
                                                                                administration

Cronos Containers N.V.*                    Netherlands Antilles                 Container investment manager

Cronos Capital Corp.                       USA                                  General Partner and limited partnership
                                                                                administration, container investment
                                                                                manager

Cronos Securities Corp.                    USA                                  Securities broking

Cronos Containers Inc.                     USA                                  Administration and marketing -- USA

Cronos Containers PTE Limited*             Singapore                            Administration and marketing -- Singapore

Cronos Containers Pty Limited*             Australia                            Administration and marketing -- Australia

Cronos Containers S.r.l                    Italy                                Administration and marketing - Southern
                                                                                Europe

Cronos Containers (Hong Kong) Limited*     Hong Kong                            Administration and marketing - Hong Kong
                                                                                and Australasia

Cronos Container Leasing GmbH              Germany                              Administration and marketing -- Germany

Cronos Equipment (Bermuda) Ltd*            Bermuda                              Container Investment

Cronos Finance (Bermuda) Ltd*              Bermuda                              Container Investment

C G Finance B.V.                           Netherlands                          Financing

Cronos Management N.V.*                    Netherlands Antilles                 Holding Company and provision of
                                                                                Executive services

Cronos Containers Scandinavia AB           Sweden                               Intermodal equipment management

Intermodal Leasing AB                      Sweden                               Intermodal equipment management

Cronos Containers (Cayman) Ltd.*           Cayman Islands                       Container Investment

Cronos Holdings Investments Inc.*          USA                                  Holding Company
</TABLE>

       * Denotes companies owned directly by the Company. All the other
companies are owned indirectly.
State of North Carolina v. Jaired Antonio Jones

No. 15P15-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

John F. Carella, Assistant Appellate Defender, Jaired Jones, for Jones, Jaried Antonio.

Donna Elizabeth Tanner, Attorney at Law, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of October 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council will meet in Sacramento, California, October 18-20, 2005. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss emerging issues in urban and community forestry. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held October 18-20, 2005. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn Sacramento Northeast, 5321 Date Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95841. Individuals who wish to speak at the meeting or to propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Suzanne M. del Villar, Executive Assistant, National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council, P.O. Box 1003, Sugarloaf, CA 92386-1003. Individuals may fax their names and proposed agenda items to (909) 585-9527. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Suzanne M. del Villar, Urban and Community Forestry Staff, (909) 585-9268, or via e-mail at                         *sdelvillar@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Council discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Council members; however, persons who wish to bring urban and community forestry matters to the attention of the Council may file written statements with the Council staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided. 

      ( print page 55102)    
Dated: September 13, 2005. 

Robin L. Thompson, 

Associate Deputy Chief, State and Private Forestry. 

[FR Doc. 05-18658 Filed 9-19-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
STATE v. AUGUSTINE, Golphin, and Walters.

No. 139PA13-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 7, 2016.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Jay H. Ferguson, Durham, for Augustine, Quintel, et al.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr.

James E. Ferguson, II, Charlotte, for Augustine, Quintel, et al.

Cassandra Stubbs, for Augustine, Quintel, et al.

William P. Hart, Sr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Robert P. Mosteller, for retired Members of the North Carolina Judiciary.

James Patrick Longest, Jr., for North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.

Irving Joyner, for North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.

Theresa A. Newman, for North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

*Amended*

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of January 2016 by Defendants for Leave to File Reply to Response to Motion for Clarification:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of January 2016."

BEASLEY, J., and ERVIN, J., recused.
----

(2004/C 65 E/265)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2961/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(8 October 2003)

Subject:   Staff employed by the Community Support Framework Management Body (MOD-AE)

Under Law 2372/96 (Official Gazette of 23 February 1996) the Community Support Framework Management Body (MOD-AE) was set up as a public limited company. This body was initially intended to operate until 2003, a period subsequently extended to 2010 with the possibility of further extensions.

Article 8(1) of the ‘MOD-AE’ Articles of Association state that staff shall be recruited from the private sector or seconded from the civil service or public sector under fixed-term renewable contracts which, under Article 8(2), cannot be converted into open-ended contracts. The MOD-AE staff members, numbering around 600, have been recruited gradually from the private sector since 1996 under fixed-term contracts renewable every two years. At the same time, the company refuses to conclude a collective agreement.

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(20 November 2003)

----

(1)OJ L 175, 10.7.1999, p. 43.

----
# C_2009006EN.01004301.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/43

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 November 2008 — Abruzzo v Commission

(Case T-384/05) (1)

1

(2009/C 6/84)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 330, 24.12.2005.

1

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARBELLA HERNANDEZ PERAL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70439

Agency No. A097-358-701

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 19, 2010** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. 

Marabella Hernandez Peral, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion

to remand. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

AUG 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70439

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand, Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395

F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hernandez Peral’s motion to

remand because she failed to establish prejudice from her former counsel’s

representation as she is statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. See

Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003) (to prevail on an

ineffective assistance of counsel claim a petitioner must demonstrate prejudice). 

Hernandez Peral’s contention that service of the facially valid notice to appear on

November 23, 2003, did not terminate her accrual of physical presence time is

unpersuasive. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A), (d)(1)(A); Garcia-Ramirez v.

Gonzales, 423 F.3d 935, 937 n.3 (9th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (accrual of physical

presence time ends when removal proceedings are commenced through service of a

notice to appear).

In light of our disposition, we need not address Hernandez Peral’s remaining

contention.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY v. LEDFORD

223PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 13, 2016

Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, for North Carolina Department of Public Safety.

Larry Leake, Attorney at Law, Asheville, for Ledford, Chauncey John.

Jamie A. Stokes, Attorney at Law.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 12th of September 2016 by Petitioner:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of September 2016."

Petitioner shall have up to and including the 19th day of October 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.