alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,903,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  438,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,732,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,648,676
<PP&E>                                       1,762,961
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,091,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,000,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          306,124
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,045
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,611,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,000,250
<SALES>                                        289,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               289,687
<CGS>                                          175,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  794,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (519,935)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (519,935)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (519,935)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.017)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.017)


</TABLE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00387

- CR

D USTIN M ICHAEL V

ARDEMAN

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Court at Law

No. 1

of Parker County ( CCL1

- 18

- 0138 )

October 14, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was n o err or in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
================================================================================


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Vanguard Minerals Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vladimir  Fedyunin,  in my capacity as Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ Vladimir Fedyunin
                                             ---------------------
Date:  May 17, 2010                          Vladimir Fedyunin
                                             Principal Financial and
                                             Accounting Officer






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE v. Arvin Roscoe HAYES

287P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 31, 2016

Mr. James R. Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hayes, Arvin Roscoe.

Mr. Daniel Snipes Johnson, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of August 2016 by Defendant to Modify Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of August 2016."
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Scottish Power plc (the Company)
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Simon Lowth, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 30, 2006

/s/ Simon Lowth Simon Lowth
Finance Director
# C_2008022EN.01004401.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/44

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 December 2007 — DeTeMedien v OHIM (suchen.de)

(Case T-117/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark suchen.de - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Domain name - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 22/81)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: DeTeMedien Deutsche Telekom Medien GmbH ((Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented initially by J. Fesenmair and I. Gehring, and subsequently by J. Fesenmair and T.M. Müller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2006 (Case R 287/2005-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign suchen.de as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders DeTeMedien Deutsche Telekom Medien GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DeTeMedien Deutsche Telekom Medien GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Joseph Rubinfeld, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SuperGen, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SuperGen, Inc.

| |  | By:    | /s/JOSEPH RUBINFELD                  
| |  | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  | Joseph Rubinfeld                     
| |  | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer

I,
Edward Jacobs, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SuperGen, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
SuperGen, Inc.

| |  | By:    | /s/EDWARD JACOBS                                  
| |  | ------ | --------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  | Edward Jacobs                                     
| |  | Title: | Chief Business Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
**Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2008 – Commission v Spain**

**(Case C‐480/07)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2000/59/EC – Port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues – Failure to have developed, implemented or approved waste reception and handling plans for all ports

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 16)*

2.                     *Environment – Waste – Directive 2000/59 – Ship-generated waste and cargo residues (Art. 249 EC; European Parliament and Council
Directive 2000/59, Art. 5(1)) (see paras 17, 21-23)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Articles 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (OJ 2000 L 332, p. 81) – Failure to have developed and/or implemented waste reception and handling plans for all ports under the jurisdiction of the ‘Comunidades Autónomas’. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to develop, implement and approve waste reception and handling plans for all Spanish ports, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
State of North Carolina v. Jeral Thomas Ore, Jr.

No. COA16-100

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 6, 2016

VACATED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       8,952,142
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,122,410
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,434,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,874,990
<PP&E>                                     103,332,389
<DEPRECIATION>                            (19,849,788)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             117,357,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,286,851
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,695
<OTHER-SE>                                  62,141,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               117,357,591
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,468,524
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,662,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,556,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,049,382
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,625,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,650,020
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,975,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,975,029
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008128EN.01002801.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 20 February 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-254/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 128/56)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.

1

---
In the Matter of S.R.M.F.

No. COA15-968.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# C_2008022EN.01002301.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/23

---

Action brought on 25 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

(Case C-475/07)

(2008/C 22/43)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by W. Mölls and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by reason of the failure to adapt by 1 January 2006 its system of taxation of electricity to the requirements of Article 21(5) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (1), the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by reason of the failure to adapt by 1 January 2006 its system of taxation of electricity to the requirements of Article 21(5) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (1), the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The transitional period accorded to the Republic of Poland for implementing the directive expired on 1 January 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 283 of 3.10.2003, p. 51.

1

---
ex10-8.htm


 


Exhibit 10.8


 


GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY


4150 Sainte-Catherine Street West, Suite 525


Montreal, Quebec H3Z 2Y5


(T) (514) 288-8070, (F) (514) 288-8655


 


 


BY MAIL AND TELECOPIER


 


April 24, 2008


 


Louis-Philippe Senecal, Eng.


Project Manager


CASCADES ENGINEERING & PROJECTS INC.


465 Boul. Marie Victorin,


Kinglsey Falls, Quebec J0A 1B0


 


Re: Quote No. 1928, Budget B.


 


Dear Sir,


 


The following is in furtherance to the Budgetary Engineering Quotation submitted to Mr. Philip Azimov of April 15th, 2008.


 


At this time we want to commence with the Phase I, Scope of Work, as is outlined in the proposal, which includes the following requirements:


 



	  	
•

	  	
Project management;


	  	  	  	  
	  	
•

	  	
Drafting personnel in order to provide CAD documents of the pump;


	  	  	  	  
	  	
•

	  	
The required fabrication services to build the prototypes required;


	  	  	  	  
	  	
•

	  	
The proper testing facility in order to perform in house test, including proper documentation and planning for UK coal dredging.







 


We ask that you please advise what you will need to start the project.


 


Yours truly,


 


GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY INC.


 


/s/ Ken Adessky


 


Per: Kenneth S. Adessky
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 08-7056 

WALTER EDWARD HALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JON P. GALLEY, Assistant Commissioner; G. LAWRENCE FRANKLIN,

Secretary; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER; JAMES V. PEGUESE; K. DANIEL

NORTHCRAFT; JOHN A. ROWLEY; CASEY CAMPBELL, Case Management

Manager; B. CASSIDY, Case Manager Supervisor; T. WATSON,

Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.

(8:07-cv-03464-DKC)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 24, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Edward Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole C. Gatewood, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 2 

PER CURIAM:

Walter Edward Hall appeals the district court’s order

denying his civil complaint seeking injunctive relief. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v.

Galley, No. 8:07-cv-03464-DKC (D. Md. May 19, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Geosciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Geosciences (1755).
    Dates/Times: October 5 & 6, 2005, 9-5:30 p.m., October 7, 2005, 
8:30 a.m.-12 noon.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
375, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Thomas Spence, Directorate for Geosciences, 
National Science Foundation, Suite 705, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, Virginia 22230, Phone (703) 292-8500.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations, and 
oversight concerning support for research, education, and human 
resources development in the geosciences.
    Agenda:
Day 1: Directorate Activities; Subcommittee Meetings.
Day 2: Subcommittee Reports; Directorate Activities.
Day 3: Plans and Activities.

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18464 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1984

PATRICIA EKWOPI OSONG,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: March 19, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per 

curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, 

Virginia, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant 

Attorney General, Luis E. Perez, Senior Litigation Counsel, 

Gary J. Newkirk, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Ekwopi Osong, a native and citizen of 

Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen as 

untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the 

administrative record and Osong’s contentions, and conclude that 

the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion. 

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2012). We accordingly deny the 

petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re: Osong (B.I.A. July 13, 2012). We further find that 

we do not have jurisdiction to review Osong’s claim that the 

Board abused its discretion in declining to reopen her removal 

proceedings sua sponte. See Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 

400-01 (4th Cir. 2009). Likewise, we lack jurisdiction over her 

ineffective assistance of counsel claim because she failed to 

file a petition for review of the Board’s order of September 12, 

2011 addressing that claim. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 

(1995). We therefore dismiss the petition for review in part 

with respect to these claims. 

Accordingly, we deny in part and dismiss in part the 

petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED IN PART

AND DISMISSED IN PART
Edgar Leron Thomas, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

August 3, 2016

**106ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on June 30, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). By order dated July 8, 2016 the Honorable D. Craig Brown was assigned exclusive jurisdiction over this matter. He has now recused himself from this case. Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Benjamin H. Culbertson be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Culbertson shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Culbertson shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the **107date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-96024) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Formula
Stock Option Plan, and the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Video Update, Inc. of our
report dated August 13, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Video Update, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended April 30, 1999.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 13, 1999