alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009019EN.01000601.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Wien — Austria) — Jobra Vermögensverwaltungs-Gesellschaft mbH v Finanzamt Amstetten Melk Scheibbs

(Case C-330/07) (1)

1

(Freedom to provide services - Freedom of establishment - Tax legislation - Investment premium - National legislation conferring a tax advantage only on assets used in a domestic place of business - Exclusion of assets hired out for remuneration primarily used in other Member States - Leasing of vehicles - Prevention of abuse)

(2009/C 19/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jobra Vermögensverwaltungs-Gesellschaft mbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Amstetten Melk Scheibbs

Defendant:

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Unabhängiger Finanzsenat — Interpretation of Articles 43 EC and 49 EC — National legislation reserving a tax advantage in respect of the acquisition of unused tangible assets (Investitionszuwachsprämie) to traders using those assets in a domestic place of business

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 EC precludes Member State legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, pursuant to which undertakings which acquire tangible assets are refused the benefit of an investment premium solely because the assets in respect of which that premium is claimed, which are hired out for remuneration, are used primarily in other Member States.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Consolidated balance and statements of income
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             272                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,608                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,075,034                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 213,175                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 997,465                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                        486,900                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     463,257                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   997,465                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,774                  99,623
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,400                  58,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,767                  17,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,083                  20,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,083                  20,867
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .35                     .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34                     .65


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 05-33]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 05-33 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: September 14, 2005.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 55342)          ( print page 55343)          ( print page 55344)          ( print page 55345)          ( print page 55346)          ( print page 55347)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 05-18755 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 10, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10581 Summary Calendar

DONNELL LINTHECOME, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN W. SNOW, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 3:05-CV-27)

_________________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Linthecome argues that the grievance procedure he selected did not require appeal to the arbitrator, a step that is required for exhaustion of the administrative remedies. That same contention was raised in the prior appeal. He lost that appeal for failure to2

exhaust administrative remedies, and now he offers no support for his contention that an appeal to an arbitrator is not required or that anything has changed. The jurisdiction of the court over the exhaustion issue was resolved in the prior cases. Linthecome is estopped to raise it here.
AFFIRMED.
# C_2023314EN.01002501.xml

| 4.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/25

---

Action brought on 17 July 2023 — Sparkasse Oberösterreich Bank v SRB

(Case T-408/23)

(2023/C 314/30)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Sparkasse Oberösterreich Bank AG (Linz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, A. Brenneis and J. Holzmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant, and

| — | order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.

The applicant further claims that, on account of the connection between and same subject matter of the following cases, they should be joined for the purposes of the written or oral part of the procedure and decision, pursuant to Article 68 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court: T-400/23, Erste Group Bank v SRB, T-401/23, Erste Bank der österreichischen Sparkassen v SRB, T-402/23, Steiermärkische Bank und Sparkasse v SRB, T-403/23, Dornbirner Sparkasse Bank v SRB, T-404/23, Kärntner Sparkasse v SRB, T-405/23, Sparkasse Niederösterreich Mitte West v SRB, T-406/23, Tiroler Sparkasse v SRB, T-407/23, Salzburger Sparkasse Bank v SRB, T-408/23, Sparkasse Oberösterreich Bank v SRB.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are identical to those relied on in Case T-402/23, Steiermärkische Bank und Sparkasse v SRB.

---
# C_2008301EN.01006702.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/67

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 23 September 2008 — Adolf and Others v Commission

(Case F-128/05) (1)

1

(2008/C 301/131)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006, p. 56.

1

---
Order filed April 5, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00112-CV

____________

LINDA A. STEWART; JOHN GARRETH STEWART, GUARDIAN OF 

THE PERSON OF THE WARD, LINDA ANNETTE STEWART AND 

LEE STEWART, GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE OF THE WARD, 

LINDA ANNETTE STEWART, Appellants

V.

BONBROOK PLANTATION COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV-273574

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed February 18, 2022. To date, the 

filing fee of $205.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellants are excused by 

statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 5. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 
Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $205.00 to the 

clerk of this court on or before April 15, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant 

fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Poissant and Wilson.
STEWART v. WEBB.

No. 274P15-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Robert K. Stewart, Marion, for Stewart, Robert K.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Maureen Krueger, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of October 2015 by Plaintiff to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Corp, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   JOHN G. CORP


John G. Corp


Principal Executive Officer


April 14, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document  authenticating,   acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this written statement  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely  pursuant  to  section  906 of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a  separate disclosure document.
# C_2008064EN.01001202.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 January 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-342/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2002/91/EC - Energy policy - Energy saving - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2008/C 64/18)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Patakia and M.B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: N. Dafniou, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 65)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by not having adopted, within the prescribed period, the legislative, regulatory and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by not having adopted, within the prescribed period, the legislative, regulatory and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 31.02

                                   Certification

I, Tom Hofer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB of Vendalux Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this Annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual
report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this Annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: July 12, 2004

By:       /s/
   --------------------------------
   Tom Hofer
   (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 21.1

 SUBSIDIARIES OF RADICA GAMES LIMITED


                                               State or Country
     Name of Subsidiary                       in Which Organized

     UNITED STATES

     Radica Enterprises Ltd                       Nevada
     (Operates as Radica USA Ltd)
       - Radica UK Ltd                            UK
       - Radica Canada Ltd                        Canada

     Disc., Inc.                                  Nevada



     INTERNATIONAL

     Radica Limited                               Hong Kong
     - Radica China Ltd                           British Virgin Islands
       - Dongguan Radica Games                    People's Republic of China
          Manufactory Co. Ltd
     - RadMex S.A. de C.V. (dormant)              Mexico

     Radica Sales (HK) Ltd                        Hong Kong
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 3, 2009 

Order 

 

December 3, 2009 

137527 

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, 

as Trustee for BANKBOSTON HOME 

EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1998-1, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137527 

 COA: 272431 

Ct of Claims: 03-000057-MT 

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and 

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

________________________________________ 

AMENDMENT TO ORDER 

On order of the Court, the order of December 2, 2009 is amended to correct a 

clerical error by correcting the line following the concurring statement of Corrigan, J., to 

read as follows: 

 “YOUNG and MARKMAN, JJ., join the statement of CORRIGAN, J.”
# CE2004084EN.01005702.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/57

---

(2004/C 84 E/0064)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3333/03

by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission

(6 November 2003)

Subject:   North Korean refugees in China

Subject:

Is the Commission aware of the current situation in China of North Korean refugees being deported back to the DPRK?

What measures are being taken by the Commission to address this state of affairs? Has it raised this issue with the Chinese government and reminded them of their obligations under the 1951 UN Convention on the status of refugees?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-3214/03 and P-3333/03

given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(28 November 2003)

(28 November 2003)

North Korea is currently a major concern for the international community including the Union. The Commission has various channels to meet representatives of the North Korean Government and to put forward its concerns. Human rights issues, including the situation of North Korean refugees on the border with China, are systematically raised during these regular political contacts. It has expressed to the North Korean authorities its concerns about the treatment of these people once returned by China to the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK). The Commission urged the DPRK to respect the fundamental rights of these citizens.

At the recent session of the United Nations Commission of Human Rights in Geneva (UNHCR), the Union tabled a resolution on the human rights situation in the DPRK. This was adopted by the UNHCR on 16 April 2003 and included a mention of the North Korean refugees in China.

The Union has consistently, within its political dialogue with China, expressed concern about the forcible repatriations of North Korean asylum — seekers to the DPRK. The issue has also been addressed within the Union — China Human Rights Dialogue. The Union will again raise the matter during the upcoming round of this dialogue, on 27/28 November 2003 in Beijing, China.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136256 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136256 

 COA: 282506 

Wayne CC: 06-011806-FC

DARNELL L. SAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000369

15-MAR-2019

08:16 AM