alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# **Exhibit 32**

# ** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of CPI Holdco, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending July 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, O. Joe Caldarelli,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ O.  Joe Caldarelli |   |
|------------------------|--------|

 

 

O. JoeCaldarelliChief Executive OfficerAugust 12, 2005

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of CPI Holdco, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending July 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joel Littman, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Joel Littman |   |
|-------------------|--------|

 

 

JoelLittmanChief Financial OfficerAugust 12, 2005

 

----
# C_2009141EN.01000502.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 April 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-331/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Animal feed and food law - Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 - Shortage of staff assigned to the services responsible for veterinary controls)

2009/C 141/08

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and F. Erlbacher, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: S. Charitaki and I. Chalkias, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules (OJ 2004 L 165, p. 1) — Shortage of staff assigned to the services responsible for veterinary controls

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by not having adopted all the measures necessary to remedy the shortage of staff assigned to the services responsible for veterinary controls in Greece, the Hellenic Republic has failure to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not having adopted all the measures necessary to remedy the shortage of staff assigned to the services responsible for veterinary controls in Greece, the Hellenic Republic has failure to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 20.10.2007.

1

---
# C_2009055EN.01000302.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 January 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Patent- und Markensenat — Austria) — Silberquelle GmbH v Maselli Strickmode GmbH

(Case C-495/07) (1)

1

(Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Articles 10 and 12 - Revocation - Concept of ‘genuine use’ of a mark - Affixing the mark to promotional items - Distribution of such items free of charge to the purchasers of goods sold by the mark's proprietor)

(2009/C 55/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Patent- und Markensenat

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Silberquelle GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Maselli Strickmode GmbH

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Patent- und Markensenat — Interpretation of Articles 10(1) and 12(1) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1) — Revocation of the rights of the proprietor of the trade mark — Concept of genuine use of the trade mark — Goods (non-alcoholic drink) being given out as free gifts on the occasion of the sale of other goods (textiles)

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 10(1) and 12(1) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that, where the proprietor of a mark affixes that mark to items that it gives, free of charge, to purchasers of its goods, it does not make genuine use of that mark in respect of the class covering those items.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 26.1.2008.

1

---
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2... See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(h), 38.1(a)–(j).

3... See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(h), 38.1(a), (d), (f), (g), (h), (j).

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-002-CV

PRISCILLA PORRAS APPELLANT

V.

TEMPEST RECOVERY SERVICES, APPELLEE

INC. (SERVICING AGENT FOR

PREMIER AUTO FINANCE)

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

On July 22, 2008, we notified Appellant Priscilla Porras that her brief did

not comply with rules 9.4(h) and 38.1(a)–(j) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure.2 On August 12, 2008, we notified Appellant that her amended brief

did not comply with rules 9.4(h) and 38.1(a), (d), (f), (g), (h), and (j).3 We
4... See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3.

5... See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a), (d), (f), (h).

6... See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c).

2

allowed Appellant until August 22, 2008 to file a second amended brief that

complied with the above rules. We stated in our letter to Appellant that her

failure to do so would result in our striking her brief and dismissing her appeal

for want of prosecution.4 On August 25, 2008, we received Appellant’s

second amended brief. It does not comply with rules 38.1(a), (d), (f), and (h).5

Accordingly, we strike Appellant’s brief and dismiss this appeal for want

of prosecution.6

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 11, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 55011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18739]



[[Page 55009]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2005-33 of August 29, 2005--Waiving 
Prohibition on Use of FY 2005 Economic Support Funds with Respect to 
Jordan



Memorandum of September 9, 2005--Assignment of Functions with Respect 
to Loan Guarantees to Egypt



Presidential Determination No. 2005-34 of September 9, 2005--Waiving 
Prohibition on United States Military Assistance with Respect to Benin


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 180 / Monday, September 19, 2005 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

[[Page 55011]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2005-33 of August 29, 
                2005

                
Waiving Prohibition on Use of FY 2005 Economic 
                Support Funds with Respect to Jordan

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Consistent with the authority vested in me by section 
                574 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and 
                Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2005 (the 
                ``Act''), Division D of Public Law 108-447, I hereby:

<bullet>

Determine that it is important to the national security interests of the 
United States to waive, for a period of 6 months from the date of this 
determination, the prohibition of section 574(a) of the Act with respect to 
Jordan; and

<bullet>

Waive the prohibition with respect to this country for that period.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                determination to the Congress, and to arrange for its 
                publication in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, August 29, 2005.

[FR Doc. 05-18739
Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
In the Matter of M.K-M.K.

No. COA16-25.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.01

                 [letterhead for Quintiles Transnational Corp.]

         March 22, 2002



         U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
         450 Fifth Street, N.W.
         Washington, D.C.  20549

          Re:      Representations by Arthur Andersen LLP



         Ladies and Gentlemen:

          Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, I acknowledge on behalf of
         Quintiles Transnational Corp. (the "Company") that Arthur Andersen LLP
         ("Andersen"), the Company's independent public accountants, has
         represented to the Company that its audit of the financial statements
         contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
         year ended December 31, 2001 was subject to Andersen's quality control
         system for U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
         assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
         professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of
         Andersen personnel working on audits, availability of national office
         consultation and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of
         Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.


         Sincerely,

         /s/ James L. Bierman

         James L. Bierman
         Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1



Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer







I, Jimmy B. Holton, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Develocap, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



6.

I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: November 16, 2005



/s/ Jimmy B. Holton



Jimmy B. Holton

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:         February 16, 2010 | /s/ David A. Bochnowski                                |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                            | David      A. Bochnowski                               |
|                                            | Chairman      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                            |                                                   |
|                                            | /s/ Robert T. Lowry                                    |
|                                            | Robert      T. Lowry                                   |
|                                            | Senior      Vice President, Chief Financial            |
|                                            | Officer      andTreasurer                              |

----
Exhibit 10.1


 


ADDENDUM TO


SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


THIS ADDENDUM TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Addendum”) is made as of the 21st
day of July, 2014 by and between UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSTRUMENTS, INC., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”)
and HARVEY B. GROSSBLATT (the “Executive”).


 


INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT


 


The Company and Executive
entered into a Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of July 18, 2005, as amended (the “Original Agreement”).
The parties desire to extend the term of the Original Agreement for an additional one-year term and amend certain provisions of
the “Bonus Formula” set forth therein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


A.All capitalized terms not otherwise
defined in this Addendum shall have the meanings set forth in the Original Agreement.


 


B.The first sentence of Section
1(b) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended in it entirety to read as follows:


 





	Subject to Section 7, the Company shall employ the Executive pursuant to the terms hereof for the period commencing as of the date hereof and ending on July 31, 2015.







 


C.In all other respects, the Original
Agreement, as amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect.


  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Addendum as of the day and year first above written.


 





	 	UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSTRUMENTS, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/	 
	 	 	James B. Huff, Vice President	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/	 
	 	 	Harvey B. Grossblatt
# C_2008313EN.01005701.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/57

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 22 October 2008 — Tzirani v Commission

(Case F-46/07) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Recruitment - Appointment in grade - Promotion - Post of director - Rejection of candidature - Implementation of a judgment annulling an appointment decision - Admissibility)

(2008/C 313/102)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marie Tzirani (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

First, annulment of the decision adopted by the Commission of the European Communities on 30 August 2006 to appoint Mr D. J. to the post of Director of Directorate B ‘Staff Regulations: Policy, Management and Advisory Services’ of the Directorate-General (DG) ‘Personnel and Administration’ and consequently to reject the applicant's candidature for that post; and, secondly, an order that the Commission is to pay compensation for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities rejecting the candidature of Mrs Tzirani for the post of Director of Directorate B ‘Staff Regulations: Policy, Management and Advisory Services’ of the Directorate-General (DG) ‘Personnel and Administration’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities rejecting the candidature of Mrs Tzirani for the post of Director of Directorate B ‘Staff Regulations: Policy, Management and Advisory Services’ of the Directorate-General (DG) ‘Personnel and Administration’;

| 2. | annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities, dated 30 August 2006, appointing Mr D. J. to the post of Director of Directorate B ‘Staff Regulations: Policy, Management and Advisory Services’ of the Directorate-General (DG) ‘Personnel and Administration’; |
| --- | --- |

2.

annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities, dated 30 August 2006, appointing Mr D. J. to the post of Director of Directorate B ‘Staff Regulations: Policy, Management and Advisory Services’ of the Directorate-General (DG) ‘Personnel and Administration’;

| 3. | orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay Mrs Tzirani EUR 10 000 damages; |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay Mrs Tzirani EUR 10 000 damages;

| 4. | for the rest, dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

4.

for the rest, dismisses the action;

| 5. | orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs and to pay Mrs Tzirani's costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs and to pay Mrs Tzirani's costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 170 of 21.7.2007, p. 42.

1

---
In the MATTER OF: S.I.P. and T.E.P.

No. COA16-208

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 15, 2016

AFFIRMED.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,007

EX PARTE CHARLES ANTHONY COLBERT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 926096-A IN THE 177TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to sixty years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Colbert v. State, No. 14-06-1141-CR (Tex. App. - Houston [14 ], delivered September th

13, 2007, no pet.)

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of
COLBERT - 2

his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial

court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that

appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed

to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary appeal pro se, because counsel never received

notice of the affirmance from the court of appeals. The trial court recommends that relief be granted.

Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of

the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-06-1141-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case

No. 926096 from the 177th Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition

for discretionary review with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which

this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: October 1, 2008

Do not publish
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion as Exhibit
99 in this Form 10-K of our report dated February 16, 2000, included in the
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P.
(the "Company"). It should be noted that we have not audited any financial
statements of the Company subsequent to December 31, 1999 or performed any audit
procedures subsequent to the date of our report.


                                           ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Dallas, Texas,
 March 27, 2000