alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3848 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

to add New York to the New England Fishery Management Council, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2014 

Mr. BISHOP of New York (for himself and Mr. ISRAEL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act to add New York to the New England 

Fishery Management Council, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New York Fair Fishing 

5 Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3848 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF NEW YORK TO NEW ENGLAND FISH2 ERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL. 

3 Section 302(a)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fish4 ery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

5 1852(a)(1)(A)) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘New York,’’ after ‘‘New 

7 Hampshire,’’; 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘except’’ and inserting ‘‘except 

9 New York and except’’; 

10 (3) by striking ‘‘18’’ and inserting ‘‘21’’; and 

11 (4) by striking ‘‘12’’ and inserting ‘‘14’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,903,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  438,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,732,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,648,676
<PP&E>                                       1,762,961
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,091,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,093,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          306,124
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,045
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,611,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,093,398
<SALES>                                        289,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               289,687
<CGS>                                          175,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  794,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (426,787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (426,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (426,787)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.014)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.013)


</TABLE>
# C_2008313EN.01002202.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/22

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 August 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester — United Kingdom) — Azlan Group plc v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Revenue and Customs

(Case C-389/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 313/35)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.

1

---
# C_2008223EN.01004002.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/40

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 July 2008 — Espinosa Labella and Others v Commission

(Case T-322/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Decision 2006/613/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region - Challengeable act - Lack of direct effect - Inadmissible)

(2008/C 223/68)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Manuel José Espinosa Labella (Almería, Spain); Josefa Labella Dávalos (Almería); María Pilar Espinosa Labella (Almería); María José Espinosa Labella (Almería); Tomasa Peñuela Ortiz (Almería); Tomás Espinosa Peñuela (Almería); Francisco José Espinosa Peñuela (Mairena del Aljarafe, Spain); Juan Manuel Espinosa Peñuela (Madrid, Espagne); María Lourdes Espinosa Peñuela (Almería); Adela Espinosa Peñuela (Almería); Jorge Jesús Espinosa Peñuela (Almería) and the heirs of de Rafael Espinosa Peñuela (Almería) (represented by: M.J. Rovira Daudí, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and D. Recchia, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, abogado del Estado)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of 19 July 2006 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2006 L 259, p. 1), in so far as it declares the site designated as ‘Artos de El Ejido’, which includes lands belonging to the applicants, to be a site of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | Manuel José Espinosa Labella, Josefa Labella Dávalos, María Pilar Espinosa Labella, María José Espinosa Labella, Tomasa Peñuela Ortiz, Tomás Espinosa Peñuela, Francisco José Espinosa Peñuela, Juan Manuel Espinosa Peñuela, María Lourdes Espinosa Peñuela, Adela Espinosa Peñuela; Jorge Jesús Espinosa Peñuela and the heirs of Rafael Espinosa Peñuela are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those of the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Manuel José Espinosa Labella, Josefa Labella Dávalos, María Pilar Espinosa Labella, María José Espinosa Labella, Tomasa Peñuela Ortiz, Tomás Espinosa Peñuela, Francisco José Espinosa Peñuela, Juan Manuel Espinosa Peñuela, María Lourdes Espinosa Peñuela, Adela Espinosa Peñuela; Jorge Jesús Espinosa Peñuela and the heirs of Rafael Espinosa Peñuela are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those of the Commission;

| 3. | The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles James CONWAY.

No. 548P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Philip A. Telfer, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

James R. Glover, Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for Conway.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 669 S.E.2d 40.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 16th day of December 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th day of December 2008 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Guang
Zhao, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of North China
Horticulture, Inc., Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
report on Form 10-Q of Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010
(the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 22, 2010





/s/
      Guang ZhaoName:  Guang
      ZhaoTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer
# C_2009267EN.01005401.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/54

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2009 — Phildar v OHIM — Comercial Jacinto Parera (FILDOR)

(Case T-99/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark FILDOR - Earlier national semi-figurative mark PHILDAR - Earlier national word mark FILDOR - Earlier international word and semi-figurative marks PHILDAR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Articles 8(1)(b), 62 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 8(1)(b), 64 and 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2009/C 267/91

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Phildar SA (Roubaix, France) (represented by: E. Baud, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Comercial Jacinto Parera SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 January 2006 (Case R 245/2004-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Phildar SA and Comercial Jacinto Parera, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 16 January 2006 (Case R 245/2004-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 16 January 2006 (Case R 245/2004-2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

1

---
## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E R R A T A

June 27, 2006

Appeal No. 05-5106

Precedential Majority Opinion, Pafford v HHS

Decided June 20, 2006

Page 1, footnote 1, line 2: please delet e “German measles” and insert “whooping

cough”.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Guang Zhao, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of North China Horticulture, Inc., Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) the report on Form 10-Q of Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: May 23, 2011
 
 /s/ Guang ZhaoName:  Guang ZhaoTitle:  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.0
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. The undersigned have executed this Certificate
as of the 27th day of October 2008.The undersigned have executed this Certificate as of
the27th day of October 2008.
 /s/ Mark MorrissonMark MorrissonChief Executive Officer and Executive Director/s/ Salesh BalakSalesh BalakChief Financial Officer
# C_2009006EN.01004502.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/45

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 4 November 2008 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-18/07) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Claim - Explicit rejection notified after the implicit rejection - Purely confirmatory measure - Complaint made out of time - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2009/C 6/91)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of 25 October 2005 rejecting the applicant's claim for recognition that he has a serious illness for the purposes of Article 72 of the Staff Regulations and the Sickness Insurance Scheme common to the institutions of the European Communities

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 22.9.2007, p. 18.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Eddie Ray MAYE, Defendant.

No. COA 15-676.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 15, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Exhibit 31.1
 
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Louis Slaughter, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of GigaBeam Corporation;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date:  November 29, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Louis Slaughter
 Louis Slaughter
 Chief Executive Officer
 GigaBeam Corporation
 
 20
In the Matter of K.L.

No. COA15-1130.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# C_2008092EN.01002403.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/24

---

Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 30 January 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-22/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 92/48)

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.

1

---
# C_2011103EN.01001902.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/19

---

Judgment of the Court of 17 February 2011 — FIFA v Commission

(Case T-385/07) (1)

1

(Television broadcasting - Article 3a of Directive 89/552/EEC - Measures taken by the Kingdom of Belgium concerning events of major importance for Belgian society - Football World Cup - Decision declaring the measures compatible with Community law - Statement of reasons - Articles 43 EC and 49 EC - Right to property)

2011/C 103/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented initially by: R. Denton, E. Batchelor, F. Young, Solicitors, and A. Barav, lawyer, and subsequently by E. Batchelor, A. Barav, D. Reymond, lawyer, and F. Carlin, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti and N. Yerrell, Agents, assisted by J. Flynn, QC, and L. Maya, Barrister)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: L. Van den Broeck and C. Pochet, Agents, assisted by J. Stuyck, A. Berenboom and A. Joachimowicz, lawyers); Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and J. Möller, Agents); and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Behzadi-Spencer, E. Jenkinson and L. Seeboruth, Agents, assisted initially by T. de la Mare, and subsequently by B. Kennelly, Barristers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2007/479/EC of 25 June 2007 on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by Belgium pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 2007 L 180, p. 24).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 22.12.2007.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of approved Tribal-State compact. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Tribal-State Off-Track Wagering Compact between the Peoria Tribe of Indians and the State of Oklahoma. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 5, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George T. Skibine, Director, Office of Indian Gaming Management, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. This Compact allows for the Tribe to conduct Off-Track wagering.                 

Dated: December 21, 2004. 

Michael D. Olsen, 

Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 05-189 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P