alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 184 (Friday, September 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Youth Advisory Committee Meetings (Teleconferences)

    Times and Dates:

September 28, 2005, 2:30 p.m. Eastern.
November 18, 2005, 3 p.m. Eastern.
January 20, 2006, 3 p.m. Eastern.
April 21, 2006, 3 p.m. Eastern.
July 21, 2006, 3 p.m. Eastern.
September 15, 2006, 3 p.m. Eastern.

    Place: National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 
850, Washington, DC.
    Agency: National Council on Disability (NCD).
    Status: All parts of these meetings will be open to the public. 
Those interested in participating should contact the appropriate staff 
member listed below.
    Agenda: Roll call, announcements, reports, new business, 
adjournment.
    Contact Person for More Information: Geraldine Drake Hawkins, 
Ph.D., Program Analyst, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street, 
NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 (voice), 202-272-
2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (fax), <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96f1fef7e1fdfff8e5d6f8f5f2b8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52353a3325393b3c21123c31367c353d24">[email protected]</span></a> (e-mail).

Youth Advisory Committee Mission

    The purpose of NCD's Youth Advisory Committee is to provide input 
into NCD activities consistent with the values and goals of the 
Americans with Disabilities Act.

    Dated: August 17, 2005.
Ethel D. Briggs,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 05-19069 Filed 9-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3758 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the second generation 

biofuel producer credit and the special allowance for second generation 

biofuel plant property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2013 

Mr. PETERS of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the second generation biofuel producer credit and the 

special allowance for second generation biofuel plant 

property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Generation 

5 Biofuel Extension Act of 2013’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3758 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SECOND GENERATION BIOFUEL 

2 PRODUCER CREDIT AND SPECIAL ALLOW3 ANCE FOR SECOND GENERATION BIOFUEL 

4 PLANT PROPERTY. 

5 (a) SECOND GENERATION BIOFUEL PRODUCER

6 CREDIT.—Subparagraph (J) of section 40(b)(6) of the In7 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘Jan8 uary 1, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2015’’. 

9 (b) SPECIAL ALLOWANCE FOR SECOND GENERATION

10 BIOFUEL PLANT PROPERTY.— 

11 (1) EXTENSION.—Subparagraph (D) of section 

12 168(l)(2) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘Jan13 uary 1, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2015’’. 

14 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Paragraph 

15 (4) of section 168(l) of such Code is amended by 

16 striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (A), by 

17 striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) 

18 and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the end the 

19 following new subparagraph: 

20 ‘‘(C) by substituting ‘January 1, 2015’ for 

21 ‘January 1, 2014’ each place it appears there22 in.’’. 

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

24 (1) CREDIT.—The amendment made by sub25 section (a) shall apply with respect to qualified secVerDate Mar 15 2010 19:50 Dec 21, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3758.IH H3758

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3758 IH

1 ond generation biofuel production after December 

2 31, 2013. 

3 (2) ALLOWANCE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (b) shall apply with respect to property 

5 placed in service after December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Joel A.Littman, certify that:

1.                  Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CPI International, Inc.;

2.                  Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

3.                  Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)               Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date:  | August 13, 2007 |                                      | Signature: |   | /s/ Joel A. Littman |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------|------------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |            | Joel A. Littman, Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10662 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. ELENO AVILA-RODRIGUEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:07-CR-2-ALL Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Eleno Avila-Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 2008 WL 59441 (Jan. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 30, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-10662

2 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GigaBeam
      Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the
“Report”), the undersigned as Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
      hereby, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of
                1934:and




(ii)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Louis S. Slaughter


Name:
      Louis S. Slaughter


Chief
      Executive Officer


Date: November
      14, 2006
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury
 AGENCY: Treasury Department.
 ACTION: Notice of membership of the Departmental Offices Performance/Bonus Review Board.
 EFFECTIVE DATE: Membership is effective on the date of this notice.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice announces the appointment of members of the Departmental Offices Performance/Bonus Review Board. The purpose of this Board is to review and make recommendations concerning proposed Performance ratings, bonuses and other appropriate personnel actions for incumbents of SES positions. The Board shall consist of at least three members. In the case of an appraisal of a career appointee, more than half the members shall consist of career appointees. The names and titles of the Board members are attached.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Talavera, Supervisory Human Resources Specialist, Department of the Treasury, Office of Human Resources, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220, Telephone: (202) 622-1044. Joy Charles, Director, Office of Human Resources.
 FY 2005 Performance/Bonus Review Board
[For listing in 
                            **Federal Register**
                            ]
Name
Official titleCarfine, Kenneth E
DAS for Fiscal Operations and Policy.Fuller, Reese H
ACD Program Director.Gardner, Janice B
Assistant Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis.Gerardi, Geraldine A
Director for Business Taxation.Granat, Rochelle
Director, Office of DC Pensions.Hammerle, Barbara C
Deputy Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.Hammond, Donald V
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.Hobbs, Ira L
DAS & Chief Information Officer.Lee, Nancy
DAS (Eurasia & Middle East).Loevinger, David G
Director, Office of East Asian Nations.Nunns, James R
Director for Individual Taxation.Pointer, Patricia J
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Resources/CHCO.Relic, Rebecca L
DAS (Pub Lia, Str Pl, Bus Dev).Schott, Charles G
DAS (Trade & Invest Policy).Shaw, Mary Beth
Executive for DC Pensions Policy Development.Sills, Gay H
Director, Office of International Investment.Sobel, Mark D
DAS (Intl Banking & Sec Markets).Solomon, Eric
DAS (Regulatory Affairs).Werner, Robert W
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.


[FR Doc. 05-19042 Filed 9-22-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4811-33-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3951 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3951

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
                 credit for energy-efficient new homes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 
                 credit for energy-efficient new homes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CREDIT FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT NEW HOMES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (g) of section 45L of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2013'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to homes acquired after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008171EN.01003403.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/34

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 January 2008 — Arktouros v Commission

(Case T-260/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 1655/2000 - Removal of financial assistance granted for an ecological project - Decision ending the project and ordering reimbursement of sums paid by way of an advance - Confirmatory measure - Expiry of the period for bringing an action - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 171/63)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Etairia prostasias kai diakhirisis fisikou perivallontos kai agrias zois ‘Arktouros’ (Association for the Protection and Management of the Natural Environment and Wildlife ‘Arktouros’) (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 3181 final of 6 July 2006 ending a project concerning conservation actions in the Northern Pindos National Park (Greece) (Ellas — LIFE03 NAT/GR/000089) and ordering reimbursement of the advance paid to the applicant in respect of the Community financial assistance which had been granted to it in implementation of Commission Decision C(2003) 2919 final of 4 September 2003.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Etairia prostasias kai diakhirisis fisikou perivallontos kai agrias zois ‘Arktouros’ shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Etairia prostasias kai diakhirisis fisikou perivallontos kai agrias zois ‘Arktouros’ shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 281 of 18.11.2006.

1

---
# C_2009044EN.01001802.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-480/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2000/59/EC - Port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues - Failure to have developed, implemented or approved waste reception and handling plans for all ports)

(2009/C 44/30)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Simonsson and R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: B. Plaza Cruz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Article 5(1) and Article 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (OJ 2000 L 332, p. 81) — Failure to have developed and/or implemented waste reception and handling plans for all ports under the jurisdiction of the ‘Comunidades Autónomas’

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to develop, implement and approve waste reception and handling plans for all Spanish ports, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) and Article 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to develop, implement and approve waste reception and handling plans for all Spanish ports, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) and Article 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 315 of 22.12.2007.

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORP.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Travelers
Property Casualty Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert I. Lipp, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 4th day of March, 2003



|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ ROBERT I. LIPP      | 
|                        | 
|Robert I. Lipp          | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 

123
1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 97-09-0208-CRA, filed in the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa

County, Texas, the Honorable Stella H. Saxon presiding. However, the challenged order was signed by the Honorable

Donna Rayes, presiding judge of the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas.

iii i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00611-CR

IN RE Michael GOMEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 17, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED

On August 13, 2008, relator Michael Gomez filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking

to compel the trial court to correct the judgment in the underlying criminal matter to reflect

additional presentence jail time credit. On August 21, 2008, this court requested the State file a

response to relator’s petition. 

On September 5, 2008, the State filed a response, agreeing that relator is entitled to

additional presentence jail time credit. The State further informed this Court that the trial court

issued a Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc on September 4, 2008. The judgment states, “It appears to the

Court that the order entered in the above entitled cause on November 14, 2006 is incorrect as it
04-08-00623-CR

-2-

appears on the minutes of the Court . . . . It further appears that the foregoing omission occurred

because of an oversight.” The judgment then orders that the original judgment reflect the following

time to be credited to relator’s sentence: July 29, 1997 to August 12, 1997; July 12, 2003 to October

24, 2003; December 29, 2003 to December 30, 2003; and December 20, 2005 to October 26, 2006.

Because relator has been granted the relief he sought, his petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed

as moot.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
# C_2009069EN.01003701.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/37

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 February 2009 — Bayern Innovativ v OHIM — Life Sciences Partners Perstock (LifeScience)

(Case T-413/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community trade mark LifeScience - Earlier Community trade mark Life Sciences Partners - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 69/85)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bayern Innovativ — Bayerische Gesellschaft für Innovation und Wissenstransfer mbH (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: A. Beschorner, B. Glaser and C. Thomas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Life Sciences Partners Perstock NV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 August 2007 (Case R 1545/2006-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Life Sciences Partners Perstock NV and Bayern Innovativ — Bayerische Gesellschaft für Innovation und Wissenstransfer mbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bayern Innovativ — Bayerische Gesellschaft für Innovation und Wissenstransfer mbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bayern Innovativ — Bayerische Gesellschaft für Innovation und Wissenstransfer mbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 8, 12.1.2008.

1

---