alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

55505 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 182 

Wednesday, September 21, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7931 of September 16, 2005 

National Hispanic Heritage Month, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Throughout our history, America has been a land of diversity and has 

benefitted from the contributions of people of different backgrounds brought 

together by a love of liberty. During National Hispanic Heritage Month, 

we celebrate the achievements of Hispanic Americans and the significant 

role they have played in making our Nation strong, prosperous, and free. 

The contributions of Hispanic Americans have made a positive impact on 

every part of our society. Americans of Hispanic descent are astronauts 

and athletes, doctors and teachers, lawyers and scientists. The vibrancy 

of our Nation’s Hispanic performers enriches music, dancing, and the arts. 

Hispanic Americans serve at every level of government, including as Attorney 

General of the United States and Secretary of Commerce. Latino entrepreneurs 

are starting and growing businesses all across America, creating jobs and 

opportunities. The hard work and determination of Hispanic Americans 

continue to inspire all those who dream of a better life for themselves 

and their families. 

Our Nation’s Hispanic community has contributed to the advance of freedom 

abroad and to the defense of freedom at home. In every generation, Hispanic 

Americans have served valiantly in the United States military. Today there 

are more than 200,000 Hispanic Americans serving in the Armed Forces, 

and our Nation is grateful for their courage and sacrifice. In addition, thousands of Hispanic Americans are helping to defend and protect our homeland 

by serving as police officers and firefighters. All Americans are thankful 

for their daily work in helping to keep our Nation safe. 

During National Hispanic Heritage Month, we join together to recognize 

the proud history and rich culture of Hispanic Americans. To honor the 

achievements of Hispanic Americans, the Congress, by Public Law 100– 

402, as amended, has authorized and requested the President to issue annually a proclamation designating September 15 through October 15 as ‘‘National Hispanic Heritage Month.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim September 15 through October 15, 2005, 

as National Hispanic Heritage Month. I call upon public officials, educators, 

librarians, and all the people of the United States to observe this month 

with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs. 

55506 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 21, 2005 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixteenth day 

of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–18975 

Filed 9–20–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
STATE of North Carolina v. Carlton Washington TOMLINSON, Defendant.

No. COA15-585.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 16, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Vacated and remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5169-5170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1856]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Manufacturing 
Technology will meet in open session on February 16, 2005, and March 
23-24, 2005, at SAI, 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    This Task Force will review the Department of Defense Manufacturing 
Technology (ManTech) Program.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will review the extent 
to which ManTech investments and

[[Page 5170]]

funding plans for each Military Service and the Defense Logistics 
Agency support near-term, warfighting operations, the industrial base, 
and long-range/revolutionary technologies. Assess the adequacy of 
technical investments across manufacturing process disciplines and 
support for both Joint Warfighting Capabilities and revolutionary 
technologies. The Task Force will also appraise funding for 
manufacturing research and development, including mechanisms to support 
both Service/Agency requirements and cross-cutting initiatives.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTC Scott Dolgoff, USA, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3D865, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94e7f7fbe0e0baf0fbf8f3fbf2f2d4fbe7f0baf9fdf8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec9f8f839898c28883808b838a8aac839f88c2818580">[email protected]</span></a>, or via phone at (703) 695-
4158.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the public who wish to attend the 
meeting must contact LTC Dolgoff no later than February 7, 2005, and 
March 7, 2005, for further information about admission as seating is 
limited. Additionally, those who wish to make oral comments or deliver 
written comments should also request to be scheduled, and submit a 
written text of the comments by February 11, 2005, and March 16, 2005, 
to allow time for distribution to Task Force members prior to the 
meeting. Individual oral comments will be limited to five minutes, with 
the total oral comment period not exceeding 30 minutes.

    Dated: January 25, 2005.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-1856 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
State of North Carolina v. Ronald Audra Ingram

No. 149P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Ms. Tiffany Y. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina

Mr. Ronald Audra Ingram, For Ingram, Ronald Audra

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of April 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 13th day of June 2016.
# EXHIBIT 23.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Fentura
Financial, Inc. on Form S-3D (File No.333-120182) and on Form S-8 (File No.
333-118085) of our report dated March 3, 2006 on the 2005 Consolidated Financial
Statements of Fentura Financial, Inc., which report is included in the 2005 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Fentura Financial, Inc.

| | /s/ CROWE CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLC
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

Grand Rapids,
MichiganMarch 17, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
7th Level, Inc.:


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated March 17, 1999, included in this Form 10-K/A, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements Filed No. 333-65525, No. 333-10335, 
No. 033-87944, No. 333-10341 and No. 333-10339 filed on Forms S-8 and 
No. 333-64365 filed on Form S-3.



                                                     Arthur Andersen LLP


New York, New York
April 30, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Geological Survey.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Act 106-503, the Scientific Earthquake 
Studies Advisory Committee (SESAC) will hold its eleventh meeting. The 
meeting location is the Courtyard Seattle Downtown /Lake Union, 925 
Westlake Avenue North, Seattle, Washington 98109. The Committee is 
comprised of members from academia, industry, and State government. The 
Committee shall advise the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey 
(USGS) on matters relating to the USGS's participation in the National 
Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.
    The Committee will review the overall direction of the U.S. 
Geological Survey's Earthquake Hazards Program in the current and next 
fiscal years with particular focus on the Program's activities in the 
Pacific Northwest.
    Meetings of the Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee 
are open to the public.

DATES: September 27, 2005, commencing at 9 a.m. and adjourning at 12 
p.m. on September 29, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. David Applegate, U.S. Geological 
Survey, MS 905, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 29192, 
(703) 648 6714.

    Dated: September 12, 2005.
Linda Gundersen,
Acting Associate Director for Geology.
[FR Doc. 05-18517 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4310 Y7 M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3691 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require additional disclosures 

when lending to military members and their dependents, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2013 

Mr. KILDEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require additional 

disclosures when lending to military members and their 

dependents, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency in Mili5 tary Lending Act of 2013’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3691 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPARENCY IN LENDING TO MILITARY MEM2 BERS AND THEIR DEPENDENTS. 

3 (a) TRANSPARENCY AND DISCLOSURES.—Section 

4 987(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by add5 ing at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(3) ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—With respect to any 

8 extension of consumer credit described under 

9 paragraph (1), a creditor shall provide to the 

10 member or dependent each of the following 

11 pieces of information, orally and in writing, and 

12 the creditor may not issue the credit unless the 

13 member or dependent signs a separate acknowl14 edgment next to each piece of information ac15 knowledging that the member or dependent has 

16 read each such piece: 

17 ‘‘(i) A statement that the Department 

18 of Defense and each service branch, offers 

19 a variety of financial counseling services. 

20 ‘‘(ii) A statement that other, lower in21 terest rate loans, including potentially 0 

22 percent interest loans, may be available 

23 through other financial institutions and 

24 military relief societies. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3691 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) Contact information for the 

2 nearest Department of Defense financial 

3 counseling office. 

4 ‘‘(iv) The actual cost of the extension 

5 of credit, prepared as an amortization 

6 table showing what the cost to the member 

7 or dependent will be if paid off at different 

8 points over time. 

9 ‘‘(B) FORMAT OF DISCLOSURES.—The dis10 closures required under this paragraph shall be 

11 made on a single sheet of paper and be in a 

12 bold, 14-point font. 

13 ‘‘(C) LIST OF FINANCIAL COUNSELING OF14 FICES.—The Secretary of Defense shall prepare 

15 a list of Department of Defense financial coun16 seling offices, and make sure the list is avail17 able to creditors and the public.’’. 

18 (b) TRANSPARENCY FOR PAYDAY LOANS AND VEHI19 CLE LOANS.—Solely for purposes of the disclosures re20 quired under section 987(c)(3) of title 10, United States 

21 Code, the Secretary of Defense shall apply the definitions 

22 of ‘‘payday loans’’ and ‘‘vehicle title loans’’ under section 

23 232.3 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as pro24 viding that the terms of such loans are 10 years or less. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### THEATTORNEYGENERAI.

June 

### 6,1962

Honorable Jerry Dellana OpinionNo.

### WW-1343 County Attorney Travis County Courthouse Re: Legalityunder Article 

### 654, Austin, Texas V.P.C.; of giving a valuable prize by means of a drawing Dear Mr. Dellana: under the facts submitted.

You have requestedan opinion as to the legality under Article 

### 654of Vernon's Penal Code of a plan described by you as follows:

"Facts: A merchant desires to give away a central air-conditioningunit at the opening of a new store and office; it is not necessary for the registrantto be present to win nor to buy anything frcm the store to register,but limits the registrants to the following: "1
. "2
. 

### "3.

"4. That only onemember of a familymay register at one time. That the registrant own a home in Travis County, Texas. That the unit will be installed in a single family residence only, the condenser being not less than two ton capacity and not greater than five ton capacity. That no employees or their immediate familymay participate." Article 

### 6.54,

Vernon's Penal Code,prohibits the establishment and operation of a lottery, and the disposition of property by lottery,but does not define a lottery. The courts have, therefore,adopted a definitionbased upon the term "lottery" and it iswell established that three things must occur to constitute an advertising scheme a lottery and these are: (a) A prize or prizes; (b) the award or distributionof the prize or prizes by chance; (c) the payment, either directly or indirectly,by the participant ofHon. Jerry Dellana Page 2 OpinionNo. WW-1343

a consideration for the right or privilege of participating. Cole v. State, 112 S.W.2d 725 (Tex.Crim.l937),Brice v. State, 242 S.W.2d 433 (Tex.Crim.1951), Smith v. State,1274 md 297 (Tex.Crim.1939).

Assuming the facts as you have given them, it is clear that no purchasemust be made to become eligible to win the prize if selected,hence there is no consideration paid by the participant. The Court of Criminal Appeals in Brice v. State holds that the going into a store and registering does not constitute the payment of consideration,even though the donormay receive a benefit from the drawing in theway of advertising. Such being the case, in our opinion thisplan is not a lotterybecause of the lack of consideration. SUMMARY

The advertisingplan does not constltute a lotteryunder the facts submitted because of the absence of consideration. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attornev General of Texas

BYCharles R. Lind AssistantAttorneyGeneral CRL:sh APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE: W. V. Geppert, Chairman Pat Bailey Vernon Teofan Jay Howell Milton Richardson REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Leonard Passmore
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 07-1512

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

PEDRO PIMENTEL,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on August 21, 2008, is

amended as follows:

On page 2, line 7: change "instructed" to "instructing."
State of North Carolina v. Dennis Sherwood Lewis

No. 170P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Marilyn G. Ozer, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Lewis, Dennis Sherwood.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 9th of May *7862016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of May 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
Jcorey Suave Kilgore Hull, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

July 21, 2016

*581ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on July 15, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Edward W. Miller be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Miller shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Miller shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
MUTTER v. BALL.

No. 150P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 25, 2016.

Jason Lee Mutter, Spruce Pine, for Mutter, Jason Lee.

Mike Ball, Superintendant, for Ball, Michael (Superintendent).

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for Ball, Michael (Superintendent).

Todd Williams, District Attorney.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of April 2016 by Petitioner to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of April 2016."

ERVIN, J. recused.
EXHIBIT
32:








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Huaren Organic Products on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Yushu Cao, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.













Date:
      August 19, 2008
            /s/
      Yushu CaoMrs.
      Yushu Cao, Chief Executive Officerand
      Chief Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136541 & (68)(69) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136541 

 COA: 277934 

Oakland CC: 2006-208760-FH 

STEVEN ALLEN THOMASON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 6, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions 

for miscellaneous relief are DENIED. 

d0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 05-29)

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 05-29 with attached transmittal, policy justification, Sensitivity of Technology and Section 620C(d).

Dated: September 14, 2005.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 55348)          ( print page 55349)          ( print page 55350)          ( print page 55351)          ( print page 55352)          ( print page 55353)          ( print page 55354)          ( print page 55355)          ( print page 55356)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 05-18756 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C