alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009069EN.01001102.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/11

---

Order of the Court of 25 November 2008 — Territorio Energia Ambiente SpA (TEA) v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-500/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Action for annulment - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Starting point - Action seeking a ruling from the Court of First Instance on the personal scope of a Commission decision - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)

(2009/C 69/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Territorio Energia Ambiente SpA (TEA) (represented by: E. Coffrini and F. Tesauro, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Righini and G. Conte, agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the order made by the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) on 17 September 2007 in Case T-175/07 Territorio Energia Ambiente SpA v Commission by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an application for a ruling, primarily, that Commission Decision 2003/193/EC of 5 June 2002 on State aid granted by Italy in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding (OJ 2003 L 77, p. 21) did not apply to the appellant and, in the alternative, that the appellant did not benefit from any unlawful aid, and for the consequential annulment, in so far as necessary, of that decision

Territorio Energia Ambiente SpA

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Territorio Energia Ambiente SpA (TEA) is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Territorio Energia Ambiente SpA (TEA) is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 9.2.2008.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
HemaSure Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-79720, 33-79722, 33-94772, 33-94768,
333-05613 and 333-05615) of our report, dated February 4, 1998, on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of HemaSure Inc. as of December 31, 1997
and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                   /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.

Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1998
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

               In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN TV
Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Gary R.
Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Vincent L. Sadusky, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


      Dated: November 4, 2004             /s/ Gary R. Chapman
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Gary R. Chapman
                                          Chief Executive Officer


      Dated: November 4, 2004             /s/ Vincent L. Sadusky
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Vincent L. Sadusky
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3802 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To extend the legislative authority of the Adams Memorial 

Foundation to establish a commemorative work in honor 

of former President John Adams and his legacy, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3802 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR 

2 MEMORIAL ESTABLISHMENT. 

3 Section 1 of Public Law 107–62 (40 U.S.C. 1003 

4 note), as amended by Public Law 111–169, is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2020’’ in 

6 subsection (c); and 

7 (2) by amending subsection (e) to read as fol8 lows: 

9 ‘‘(e) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS FOR ESTABLISHED

10 MEMORIAL.— 

11 ‘‘(1) If upon payment of all expenses for the es12 tablishment of the memorial (including the mainte13 nance and preservation amount required by section 

14 8906(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code), there 

15 remains a balance of funds received for the estab16 lishment of the commemorative work, the Adams 

17 Memorial Foundation shall transmit the amount of 

18 the balance to the account provided for in section 

19 8906(b)(3) of title 40, United States Code. 

20 ‘‘(2) If upon expiration of the authority for the 

21 commemorative work under section 8903(e) of title 

22 40, United States Code, there remains a balance of 

23 funds received for the establishment of the com24 memorative work, the Adams Memorial Foundation 

25 shall transmit the amount of the balance to a sepa26 rate account with the National Park Foundation for 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3802 RFS 

1 memorials, to be available to the Secretary of the In2 terior or the Administrator (as appropriate) fol3 lowing the process provided for in section 8906(b)(4) 

4 of title 40, United States Code, for accounts estab5 lished under section 8906(b)(2) or (3) of title 40, 

6 United States Code.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2008 – Polier v Najar**

**(Case C‐361/07)**

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Convention No 158 of the International Labour Organisation – European Social Charter – Dismissal of an employee without valid reason – Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court

Preliminary rulings – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits (Art. 234 EC) (see paras 10-11)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conseil de Prud’Hommes de Beauvais – Interpretation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Arts 30 and 33), the European Social Charter (Arts 24 and 27), and of Convention No 158 of the International Labour Organisation, as regards termination of employment – Dismissal of an employee without valid reason – Whether national legislation is valid in the light of the abovementioned provisions. |

**Operative part**

The Court of Justice of the European Communities manifestly does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions posed by the
Conseil de prud’hommes de Beauvais by decision of 9 July 2007.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                ------------------------------------------------

     In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
SouthCrest Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31,
                                       -------
2005 (the " Periodic Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the
            ---------------
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of his individual knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 16, 2005



/s/ Larry T. Kuglar

-------------------------------
Larry T. Kuglar
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.1



 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


July 24, 2014


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Zacks GARP Composite 35 Trust,
Series 2


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Zacks GARP Composite 35 Trust, Series 2 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on July 24, 2014, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the
Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-196636) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO_________ 


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
EXHIBIT 31: Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Huakang Zhou, certify that:

        1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Ultradata Systems, Incorporated;

	2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

	3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial information included in this report fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

	4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

	a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

	b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

	c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

	5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and
the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

        b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal controls over financial reporting.


Date:  November 6, 2006              /s/  Huakang Zhou
                                     ------------------------------------
                                     Huakang Zhou, Chief Executive
                                      Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012006EN.01001001.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Low & Bonar and Bonar Technical Fabrics v Commission

(Case T-59/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Plastic industrial bags sector - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Single and continuous infringement - Fines - Attenuating circumstances - Passive role - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Unlimited jurisdiction)

2012/C 6/13

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Low & Bonar plc (Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom) and Bonar Technical Fabrics NV (Zele, Belgium) (represented by: L. Garzaniti, lawyer, and M. O’Regan, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agent, assisted by M. Gray, Barrister)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags), concerning a cartel on the market for plastic industrial bags, and, in the alternative, for annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed by Article 2(l) of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags) at EUR 9.18 million; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed by Article 2(l) of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags) at EUR 9.18 million;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | The European Commission, Low & Bonar plc and Bonar Technical Fabrics NV shall each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission, Low & Bonar plc and Bonar Technical Fabrics NV shall each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,631,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,415,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    575,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,306,000
<PP&E>                                      61,899,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,218,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,357,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       66,836,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       469,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (9,970,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,357,000
<SALES>                                     63,301,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            63,301,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               61,102,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,095,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,559,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,559,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,559,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (4,559,000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (4,559,000)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.3



Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated July 24, 2014, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-196636) of Smart Trust, Zacks
GARP Composite 35 Trust, Series 2.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


July 24, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18411]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Application of PM Air, LLC For Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order To Show Cause (Order 2005-9-12); Docket OST-
2005-20363.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding PM Air, 
LLC fit, willing, and able, and awarding it a certificate of public 
convenience and necessity to engage in interstate scheduled air 
transportation of persons, property, and mail operating no more than 
two aircraft in scheduled service under Part 135 of the Federal 
Aviation Regulations.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
September 26, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket OST-2005-20363 and addressed to U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room PL-401), 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the 
parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Damon D. Walker, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-7785.

    Dated: Monday, September 12, 2005.
Karan K. Bhatia,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affair.
[FR Doc. 05-18411 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000930803
<NAME>                        Hauppauge Digital, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         5,224,771
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,856,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                    12,777,810
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,878,841
<PP&E>                                         1,411,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                 576,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,798,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,968,213
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       45,633
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,784,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,798,460
<SALES>                                        22,043,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,043,649
<CGS>                                          16,735,724
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,486,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (84,402)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               15,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,906,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                   430,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,476,155
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,476,155
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.30



</TABLE>
# C_2008092EN.01004702.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 February 2008 — Putterie-De-Beukelaer v Commission

(Case F-31/07) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - Appraisal procedure - Attestation procedure - Appraisal of potential - Breach of the scope of the law - Raised by the Court of its own motion)

(2008/C 92/95)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Françoise Putterie-De-Beukelaer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the applicant's Career Development Report concerning the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2005, in particular in respect of section 6.5 ‘Potential’, in so far as that report does not acknowledge the applicant's potential to carry out duties in category B* for the purposes of the attestation procedure.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal

| 1. | Annuls the Career Development Report of Ms Putterie-De-Beukelaer concerning the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2005 in so far as it does not acknowledge the applicant's potential to carry out duties in category B*; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Career Development Report of Ms Putterie-De-Beukelaer concerning the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2005 in so far as it does not acknowledge the applicant's potential to carry out duties in category B*;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 117, 26.5.2007, p. 38.

1

---