alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 

136121(16) 

JOHN CORRION,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v 

LIVINGSTON CIRCUIT JUDGE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 SC: 136121 

 COA: 284024 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2008 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
In the MATTER OF: M.A.W.

No. 279PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016.

Rebekah W. Davis, Attorney at Law, for Allen, Anthony Brock.

Regina Floyd-Davis, Attorney at Law, for New Hanover County DSS.

William L. Esser, IV, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for GAL.

*685***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th of July 2016 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of August 2016 by Petitioner to Deem Petition for Discretionary Review Timely Filed:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 4th of August 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
# C_2008079EN.01002401.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-329/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 79/44)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SouthCrest
Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “ Periodic Report”),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his individual
knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Dated:
      May 15, 2008/s/
      Douglas J. HerthaDouglas J. HerthaChief
      Financial Officer
State of North Carolina v. Jaired Antonio Jones

No. COA15-995

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 6, 2016

NO PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
SUSAN HAWK

Criminal District Attorney

Dallas County, Texas

November 12, 2015

Mr. Michael F. Stauffacher COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Supervising Attorney, Writs Section

Texas Court ofCriminal Appeals foUV'16 2015

P.O. Box 12308

Austin, Texas 78711

AbeUcosta,Cferk

RE: Ex Parte Stanley Orson Mozee, WR-82, 467-01 &

Ex Parte Dennis Lee Allen, WR-56, 666-03

Dear Mr. Stauffacher:

On February 4, 2015 this Court remanded the above-referenced cases to the trial court to provide

the trial prosecutor with an opportunity to respond to the Brady claims of both Applicants.

Article 11.07writs were previously filed in both casesallegingmultiple grounds for relief. Both

causes were transmitted to this Court with agreed findings that Applicants were entitled to relief

based on Brady violations and the presentmentof false evidence.

Pursuant to the remand order, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on October 26 and

27, 2015 during which the trial prosecutor testified regarding the Brady claims. On November

10, 2015, the trial court entered and filed its Findings of Fact on Remand specifically finding the

trial prosecutor's testimony to be credible. The trial court also entered a finding that both the

trial prosecutor's testimony and his trial notes support that "he turned over thejailhouse letters to

defense counsel" (the Brady information).

Given the trial court's findings on remand and that both the trial court and the State had

previously agreed that Applicants are entitled to relief under Brady, the State is respectfully

requesting this Court to provide the State withan opportunity to respond and/or object to the trial

court's Findings of Fact on Remand.

On October 27, 2015 the State requested a transcript of the evidentiary hearing. As of today's

date, the courtreporter has not completed the transcript. The State expects the transcript will be

completed sometime during the week of November 16, 2015. Accordingly, the State anticipates

being able to respond by December 15,2015.

Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 North Riverfront Boulevard, LB-19 Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 (214) 653-3600
Letter to Mr. Michael F. Stauffacher

November 12,2015 .

Page 2 of2

Please let me know if you have any questions or if you need additional information. Thank you

foTYour anticipated courtesies.

PATRICIA CfcMMINGS

Assistant District Attorney

Conviction Integrity Unit

Dallas County, Texas

cc: Mr. Abel Acosta, Clerk ofthe Court

Mr. Gary Udashen,Attorney for'Dennis Lee Allen

Mr. Ezekiel Tyson, Attorney for Stanley Mozee

Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 NorthIndustrial Boulevard, LB-19 Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 (214) 653-3600
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                       321
<INVENTORY>                                     15,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,273
<PP&E>                                         189,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,136
<BONDS>                                              0<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               637,057
<CGS>                                          511,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  592,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,760)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,760)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,760)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPERATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR ACCOMPANYING
NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
SMC CORPORATION                                                       EXHIBIT 11
STATEMENT OF CALCULATION OF AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Three Months
                                                                       Ended
                                                                  March 31, 1998
                                                                  --------------
<S>                                                                    <C>      
Basic Earnings Per Share:

     Weighted average number of shares                                 6,439,777
                                                                       =========

Diluted Earnings Per Share:

     Weighted average number of shares                                 6,439,777

     Stock option plan shares to be issued at prices
     ranging from $7.375 to $9.00 per share                              965,500

     Warrant issues at a price of $9.30 per share                        125,000

     Less: Assumed purchase of shares by the Company at the
           average market price during the period using the
           proceeds received upon the assumed exercise of
           the outstanding options and warrants                       (1,022,902)

           Total Diluted Shares                                        6,507,375
                                                                       =========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.3

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Yukon Gold
Corporation, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2004
(the Form10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: December 13, 2004


                       /s/ W. Warren Holmes
                       -------------------------------
                       W. Warren Holmes, CEO
                       (Chief Executive Officer of Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc.)


Dated: December 13, 2004

                       /s/ Stafford Kelley
                       -------------------------------
                       Stafford Kelley, Chief Financial Officer
                       (Chief Financial Officer of Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc.)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. and will be retained by Yukon Gold
Corporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
STATE v. Calvin Renard CARTER

193PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2016

Richard J. Costanza, Attorney at Law, Southern Pines, for Carter, Calvin Renard.

Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of July 2016 by Defendant to Deem as Timely Filed the Response to Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6126

PHILLIP MARK SHAFER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

KEVIN BRANDT, Superintendent; JAMES PERRY, Historic Program

Director; DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary; WILL REYNOLDS, U.S. Park

Police,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:07-

cv-00219-PJM)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 18, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Samuel Gordon, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Mark Shafer appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985,

1986 (2000), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau

of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Shafer v. Brandt, No. 8:07-cv-00219-PJM (D.

Md. Dec. 20, 2007 & Mar. 5, 2008). We deny Shafer’s pending

motions for appointment of counsel and for oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
In the Matter of: D.T.H. and D.K.H.

No. COA16-174

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,974,164
<SECURITIES>                                34,249,315
<RECEIVABLES>                              111,708,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                   723,380
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           152,655,794
<PP&E>                                       2,435,077
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,323,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             153,766,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      137,565,792
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,866
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,191,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               153,766,899
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,862,440
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,255,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,229,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               215,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                162,310
<INCOME-TAX>                                    69,409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             92,901
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    92,901
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 389 

To require the submission to the Congress of annual reports on the tobacco 

user fees assessed and collected under section 919 of the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2013 

Mr. GUTHRIE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the submission to the Congress of annual reports 

on the tobacco user fees assessed and collected under 

section 919 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency in To5 bacco User Fees Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 389 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORTING ON TOBACCO USER FEES. 

2 Section 919 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

3 Act (21 U.S.C. 387s) is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(f) REPORTING.— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning with fiscal year 

7 2014, not later than 120 days after the end of each 

8 fiscal year for which fees are collected under this 

9 section, the Secretary shall, with respect to such fis10 cal year, prepare and submit to the Committee on 

11 Energy and Commerce of the House of Representa12 tives and the Committee on Health, Education, 

13 Labor, and Pensions of the Senate a report con14 cerning such fees. 

15 ‘‘(2) CONTENTS.—Each report under para16 graph (1) shall, with respect to the fiscal year in17 volved, include at a minimum the following: 

18 ‘‘(A) The total amount of fees assessed 

19 and collected under this section. 

20 ‘‘(B) A description of how such fees have 

21 been, or are intended to be, used. 

22 ‘‘(C) The total amount of fees assessed 

23 and collected under this section which have not 

24 been obligated. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 389 IH

1 ‘‘(D) The total amount of fees assessed 

2 and collected under this section which have 

3 been obligated, but have not been expended. 

4 ‘‘(E) Of the fees assessed and collected 

5 under this section, the portion of such fees 

6 which have been, or are intended to be, pro7 vided to public or private entities outside of the 

8 Federal Government. 

9 ‘‘(F) The total number of tobacco products 

10 for which an application is received, or an order 

11 is issued, under section 910. 

12 ‘‘(G) Of the applications received under 

13 section 910— 

14 ‘‘(i) the number of such applications 

15 disposed of; and 

16 ‘‘(ii) the number of such applications 

17 which remain pending. 

18 ‘‘(H) The total number of modified risk to19 bacco products (as defined in section 911(b)) 

20 for which an application is received, or an order 

21 is issued, under section 911. 

22 ‘‘(I) Of the applications received under sec23 tion 911— 

24 ‘‘(i) the number of such applications 

25 disposed of; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 389 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) the number of such applications 

2 which remain pending.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Dennis Sherwood LEWIS.

No. COA15-191.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
II 

Calendar No. 546 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4002 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

AUGUST 26, 2014 

Reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of August 5 (legislative 

day, August 1), 2014, by Mr. TESTER, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To revoke the charter of incorporation of the Miami Tribe 

of Oklahoma at the request of that tribe, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF CHARTER OF INCORPORA4 TION. 

5 The request of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma to sur6 render the charter of incorporation issued to that tribe 

7 and ratified by its members on June 1, 1940, pursuant 

8 to the Act of June 26, 1936 (25 U.S.C. 501 et seq.; comVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:56 Aug 27, 2014 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4002.RS H4002

tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4002 RS

1 monly known as the ‘‘Oklahoma Welfare Act’’), is hereby 

2 accepted and that charter of incorporation is hereby re3 voked. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 546 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4002 

AN ACT 

To revoke the charter of incorporation of the Miami 

and for other purposes. Tribe of Oklahoma at the request of that tribe, 

AUGUST 26, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
FOLLUM v. N.C. STATE UNIVERSITY AT RALEIGH.

No. COA08-608.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (07CVS16476).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
KEN BRISEBOIS



CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON





To:

US Securities and Exchange Commission



I, Ken Brisebois, do hereby consent to (i) the incorporation by reference of the following document(s) into the annual information form (the AIF) of Nevsun Resources Ltd. (the Issuer) dated March 22 2006 to be filed with certain Canadian securities commissions and the annual report on Form 40-F (the 40-F) of the Issuer to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection therewith, and (ii) the inclusion of any extracts from or summary of such document(s) in the AIF and the 40-F:

1.  Technical Report on the Bisha Property and Resource Estimate of the Bisha Deposit, dated October 1, 2004

2.  Bisha Property, Gash-Barka District, Eritrea 43-101 Technical Report and Preliminary Assessment dated December 22, 2005

(collectively, the Technical Report)

I also certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and that it fairly and accurately represents the information in the technical report that supports the written disclosure in the AIF and the 40-F dated March 23, 2006 of Nevsun Resources Ltd.

Dated this23 day of March, 2006.

sigend

_______________________
Ken Brisebois

[Seal or Stamp]
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 (the “Report”) of Hercules Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gerard R. Waldt, Jr., the Interim Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

| Date: August 2, 2018 | By:    | /S/ GERARD R. WALDT, JR.

  |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                 |   | Gerard R. Waldt, Jr.             |
|                 |   | Interim Chief Accounting Officer |