alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UAP HoldingCorp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 26, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, L. KennethCordell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.1350), that, to my knowledge:

(1)                   The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

(2)                   The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Date: October 5, 2007
| By:        | **/s/ L. Kenneth Cordell**                | ** ** |
|------------|-------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** ** | **L. Kenneth Cordell**                    | ** ** |
| ** ** | **President and Chief Executive Officer** | ** ** |
| ** ** | **Principal Executive Officer**           | ** ** |

 

 

 

1

----
# C_2008313EN.01003002.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/30

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 October 2008 — Rewe-Zentrale v OHIM (PORT LOUIS)

(Case T-230/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark PORT LOUIS - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Designation of the geographical origin of the goods - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 313/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Rewe-Zentrale AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 June 2006 (Case R 25/2006-1) concerning an application to register the word mark PORT LOUIS as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 21 June 2006 (Case R 25/2006-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 21 June 2006 (Case R 25/2006-1);

| 2. | orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 261 of 28.10.2006.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31

                       QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Stephen Samuels, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cameron
     International, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of November, 2005.


/s/ Stephen Samuels
-----------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 85-6812.

#### Davidson *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
Teresa Thompson, Plaintiff v. Evergreen Baptist Church, Defendant

No. COA15-1031

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
7/th/ Level, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-10335, 333-10339, 333-65525, 033-87944 and 333-10341) and on Form S-3
(333-64365) of 7th Level, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 1998, related to
the consolidated balance sheet of 7/th/ Level, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for each of the years
in the two year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the
December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of 7th Level, Inc.

Our report dated January 30, 1998 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses since inception and does not
currently have sufficient resources to meet its anticipated operating
requirements during 1998, which conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.
 



                                                          KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 29, 1999
STATE v. Paris Jujuan TODD

18A14-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 2, 2016

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Reid Cater, Attorney at Law, for Todd, Paris Jujuan.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of September 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of September 2016."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3947 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend for one year the 

work opportunity tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2014 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

for one year the work opportunity tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX 

4 CREDIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

6 51(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘Decem8 ber 31, 2014’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3947 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

3 the employer after December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2010100EN.01003702.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — Freistaat Sachsen and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T-102/07 and T-120/07) (1)

1

(State aid - Aid granted by Germany in the form of a participation and loan guarantees - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the common market - General aid scheme approved by the Commission - Concept of a firm in difficulty - Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty - Amount of aid - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

2010/C 100/57

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Freistaat Sachsen (Germany) (represented by: C. von Donat and G. Quardt, lawyers) (Case T-102/07), MB Immobilien Verwaltungs GmbH (Neukirch, Germany) (represented initially by: G. Brüggen, and subsequently by A. Seidl, K. Lengert and W. Sommer, lawyers) and MB System GmbH & Co. KG, (Nordhausen, Germany) (represented by: G. Brüggen, lawyer) (Case T-120/07)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Gross and T. Scharf, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/492/EC of 24 January 2007 on the State aid C 38/2005 (ex NN 52/2004) implemented by Germany for the Biria Group (OJ 2007 L 183, p. 27)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2007/492/EC of 24 January 2007 on the State aid C 38/2005 (ex NN 52/2004) implemented by Germany for the Biria Group. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2007/492/EC of 24 January 2007 on the State aid C 38/2005 (ex NN 52/2004) implemented by Germany for the Biria Group.

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings in Case T-120/07. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings in Case T-120/07.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 9.6.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 32.0
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. The undersigned have
executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of
August 2010.
 /s/ Mark MorrissonMark MorrissonChief Executive Officer and Executive
Director/s/ Salesh BalakSalesh BalakChief Financial Officer 
 *
    
    This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b)
under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent such
certification is explicitly incorporated by reference in such filing.
# C_2009153EN.01000801.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-516/07) (1)

1

(Failure to fulfil obligations - Directive 2000/60/EC - Framework for Community action in the field of water policy - Designation of competent authorities for hydrographic districts)

2009/C 153/15

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: B. Plaza Cruz, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with Article 3(2), (7) and (8) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ 2000 L 327, p. 1)

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to designate the competent authorities for the application of the rules of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(2) and (7) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to designate the competent authorities for the application of the rules of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(2) and (7) of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 9.2.2008.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1412

ROBERT E. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LENOIR COUNTY; KINSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT;

PRESTON C. ELLIS, JR., Individually and

officer; C. SCOTT JACKSON, Individually and as

officer; JOHN DOES, Individually; JOHN DOES;

JANE DOES, Individually; JANE DOES; CARLTON

NEIL FLOWERS, Individually; CARLTON NEIL

FLOWERS, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-97-140-4-H-2)

Submitted: June 9, 1998 Decided: June 24, 1998

Before HAMILTON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert E. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Harrison Sasser, III,

G. Christopher Olson, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh,

North Carolina; Rudolph Alexander Ashton, III, SUMRELL, SUGG,

CARMICHAEL & ASHTON, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court’s order denying

relief on his civil rights complaint asserting violations under 42

U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (1994) and North Carolina’s constitution. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Lenoir County, No. CA-97-

140-4-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2012013EN.01001001.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2011 — Jones and Others v Commission

(Case T-320/07) (1)

1

(ECSC Treaty - Supply of coal intended for the United Kingdom electricity generation industry - Rejection of a complaint alleging discriminatory pricing - Commission’s competence to apply Article 4(b) CS following expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Assessment of Community interest - Obligations in relation to the investigation of a complaint - Manifest error of assessment)

2012/C 13/18

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Daphne Jones (Neath, United Kingdom), Glen Jones (Neath), and Fforch-Y-Garon Coal Co. Ltd (Neath) (represented by: D. Jeffreys and S. Llewellyn Jones, Solicitors)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and J. Samnadda, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, (represented: initially by E. Jenkinson, subsequently by C. Gibbs and V. Jackson, and, finally, by S. Hathaway, acting as Agents, and by J. Flynn QC); E.ON UK plc (Coventry, United Kingdom) (represented by P. Lomas, Solicitor); and International Power plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by D. Anderson QC, M. Chamberlain, Barrister, S. Lister and D. Harrison, Solicitors)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision SG-Greffe (2007) D/203626 of 18 June 2007, pursuant to Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 [EC] and 82 [EC] (OJ 2004 L 123, p. 18), rejecting the applicants’ complaint concerning infringements of the ECSC Treaty (Case COMP/37.037-SWSMA).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs of Mr Glen Jones and of Mrs Daphne Jones, as well as those of Fforch-Y-Garon Coal Co. Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs of Mr Glen Jones and of Mrs Daphne Jones, as well as those of Fforch-Y-Garon Coal Co. Ltd.

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, E.ON UK plc and International Power plc each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, E.ON UK plc and International Power plc each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 20.10.2007.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3805 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3805

    To provide for the redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for 
   Security Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for 
                           Security Studies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 23, 2013

 Ms. Hanabusa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for the redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for 
   Security Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for 
                           Security Studies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC CENTER FOR SECURITY 
              STUDIES AS THE DANIEL K. INOUYE ASIA-PACIFIC CENTER FOR 
              SECURITY STUDIES.

    (a) Redesignation.--The Department of Defense regional center for 
security studies known as the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies 
is hereby renamed the ``Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for 
Security Studies''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Reference to regional centers for strategic studies.--
        Section 184(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is 
        amended by striking ``Asia-Pacific Center for Security 
        Studies'' and inserting ``Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center 
        for Security Studies''.
            (2) Acceptance of gifts and donations.--Section 
        2611(a)(2)(B) of such title is amended by striking ``Asia-
        Pacific Center for Security Studies'' and inserting ``Daniel K. 
        Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies''.
    (c) References.--Any reference to the Department of Defense Asia-
Pacific Center for Security Studies in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for 
Security Studies.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008008EN.01000402.xml

| 12.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 November 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-59/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/109/EC - Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2008/C 8/07)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and A. Alcover San Pedro, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of the Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 24.3.2007.

1

---