alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.3


 


ENDORSEMENT TO 10% SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE


 


Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.

New York, New York

November 30, 2010


 


The
10% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 25, 2008 and amended
December 11, 2008, June 25, 2010, July 26, 2010, September 15,
2010 and October 15, 2010, November 15, 2010 (the “Note”) of
Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”),
payable to the order of Special Situations Fund III, QP, L.P. (the “Holder”)
in an aggregate principal amount of $275,000 and to which the Endorsement is
affixed is hereby amended in the following respects:


 


1.                                      The term “Stated
Maturity Date” is hereby restated to be “December 1, 2010.”


 


2.                                      Except as
expressly amended by this Endorsement, the Note remains in full force and
effect and the Company hereby reconfirms its obligations thereunder.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be duly executed,
and the Holder has caused this Endorsement to be duly accepted, by their
respective duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above
written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  PRECISION
  OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By

  	
  /s/
  Richard E. Forkey

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Richard E. Forkey

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  SPECIAL
  SITUATIONS FUND III QP, L.P.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Adam Stettner

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:
  Adam Stettner

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:
  General Partner
# C_2023321EN.01005801.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/58

---

Action brought on 14 July 2023 — Nordea Bank v SRB

(Case T-412/23)

(2023/C 321/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nordea Bank Oyj (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Decision of the SRB of 2 May 2023, document no. SRB/ES/2023/23, including Annexes I, II and III, as far as it concerns the ex-ante contribution of the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Decision of the SRB of 2 May 2023, document no. SRB/ES/2023/23, including Annexes I, II and III, as far as it concerns the ex-ante contribution of the applicant;

| — | order the SRB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the SRB to pay the costs.

Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the SRB has infringed Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 (1) by not applying the binding 12,5 % cap to the target level when determining the 2023 annual target level.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).

---
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of enherent Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas A. Catalano, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to enherent Corp. and will be retained by enherent Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
STATE v. Quincey Lamar HILL.

No. 150P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Quincey Lamar Hill, Bayboro, for Hill, Quincey Lamar.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of April 2015 by Defendant for Request for Counsel:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

BEASLEY, J. recused.
# C_2009141EN.01000302.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van koophandel te Antwerpen (Belgium)) — VTB-VAB NV (C-261/07) and Galatea BVBA (C-299/07) v Total Belgium NV (C-261/07) and Sanoma Magazines Belgium NV (C-299/07)

(Case C-261/07 and C-299/07) (1)

1

(Directive 2005/29/EC - Unfair commercial practices - National legislation prohibiting combined offers to consumers)

2009/C 141/05

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van koophandel te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: VTB-VAB NV (C-261/07), Galatea BVBA (C-299/07)

Applicants:

Defendants: Total Belgium NV (C-261/07), Sanoma Magazines Belgium NV (C-299/07)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank van koophandel te Antwerpen — Interpretation of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ 2005 L 147, p. 22) — National legislation prohibiting combined offers to consumers

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the disputes in the main proceedings, which, with certain exceptions, and without taking account of the specific circumstances, imposes a general prohibition of combined offers made by a vendor to a consumer.

---

(1)  OJ C 199, 25.8.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Ralph M. Amato, Chief Executive Officer of BoysToys.com, Inc. (the "registrant"), do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:



(1) the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), to which this Statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



(2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|Dated:  November 9, 2005 | By:  /s/ Ralph M. Amato         Ralph M. Amato
         Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1324

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Earl Smith, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: September 18, 2008

Filed: September 23, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Earl Smith appeals the district court’s1

 order denying his motion for a reduction

of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 706 to the

United States Sentencing Guidelines, which reduced the base offense levels in

U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c) for cocaine-base offenses.

Smith pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute more than 50 grams

of a mixture containing cocaine base, which subjected him to a mandatory minimum
-2-

sentence of 120 months in prison. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A); U.S.S.G.

§ 5G1.1(c)(2). Accordingly, Smith is not entitled to a reduction under the retroactive

amendment. See United States v. Jones, 523 F.3d 881, 882 (8th Cir. 2008) (per

curiam). The district court’s judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________
AMERICAN MECHANICAL, INC. v. Jeffrey L. BOSTIC, Michael Hartnett, and Joseph E. Bostic, Jr.

No. 73P16.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 2016.

Zeyland G. McKinney, Jr., Robbinsville, for American Mechanical, Inc.

Eric W. Stiles, Robbinsville, for American Mechanical, Inc.

D. Erik Albright, for Hartnett, Michael.

Matthew N. Leerberg, Raleigh, for Hartnett, Michael.

Christine L. Myatt, Greensboro, for Bostic, Jeffrey L.

David S. Pokela, Greensboro, for Bostic, Jeffrey L.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of March 2016 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."
H. R. 3765 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 198 Baker 

Street in Corning, New York, as the ‘‘Specialist Ryan P. Jayne Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST RYAN P. JAYNE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 198 Baker Street in Corning, New York, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Specialist Ryan P. Jayne Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Specialist Ryan P. Jayne Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# CE2004088EN.01006901.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/69

---

(2004/C 88 E/0075)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2116/03

by Claude Moraes (PSE) to the Commission

(25 June 2003)

Subject:   The situation in Sudan

Subject:

Is the Commission aware of reports that jihad has been declared on Christian communities in Sudan and that the Sudanese Government is arbitrarily detaining (and in some cases torturing) journalists, students and others who speak out against the Government?

What are the Commission's plans to deal with this unacceptable situation in Sudan?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(15 July 2003)

(15 July 2003)

The Commission is not aware that jihad has been declared recently on the Christian communities in Sudan.

The Commission notes the progress achieved in the context of the ongoing Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) Peace Talks. In particular, the signature of the Machakos Protocol (July 2002) in which the Government of Sudan and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) agreed upon the respect of all religions and the freedom of practice.

The Union continues to monitor the situation of human rights, rule of law and democratisation in Sudan. In the recent prosecutions of journalists and students, the Commission was aware of one case of a journalist being put into prison. A Union démarche to the Government of Sudan was made during the April 2003 meeting of the Union/Sudan Political Dialogue. Subsequently, the journalist was released and the newspaper re-opened.

---
In the Matter of: J.F.

No. COA16-259

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

AFFIRMED.
**Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2009 – Commission v France**

**(Case C‐556/07)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Common Fisheries Policy – Regulation (EC) No 894/97 – Drift net – Meaning – ‘Thonaille’ fishing net – Prohibition on the fishing of certain species – Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93 and (EC) No 2371/2002 – Lack of an effective system of monitoring to ensure compliance with that prohibition

1.                     *Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – Technical conservation measures (Council Regulation No 894/97, as amended
by Regulation No 1239/98, Art. 11a) (see paras 48-69)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 76)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Common Fisheries Policy – Council Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (OJ 1993 L 261, p. 1) and (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy (OJ 2002 L 358, p. 59) – Acceptance by national authorities of the ‘thonaille’ notwithstanding the Community prohibition on drag nets of a length greater than or equal to 2.5 km – Lack of an effective system of monitoring to ensure compliance with that prohibition. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing sufficiently to monitor, inspect and supervise fishing activities in the light of the prohibition on drift nets for the capture of certain species, and by not ensuring that appropriate measures against those responsible for infringements of the Community legislation on the use of drift nets were taken, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2 and 31(1) and (2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2846/98 of 17 December 1998 and Articles 23(1) and (2), 24 and 25(1) and (2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-25-1996
<PERIOD-START>                    DEC-26-1995
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-25-1996
<CASH>                                  4,330
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          91,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                           102,217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      201,574
<PP&E>                                165,577
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        407,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 111,517
<BONDS>                                 2,009
<COMMON>                              263,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          407,799
<SALES>                               449,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      449,365
<CGS>                                 287,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         402,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       (2,647)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      2,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        46,761
<INCOME-TAX>                           15,206
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    31,555
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           31,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.63
        




</TABLE>
anyi_ex1027.htm


Exhibit 10.27


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 




  





8











  






 


 




  





9











  






 


 




  





10











  






 


 




  





11











  






 


 




  





12











  






 


 




  





13











  






 


 



14
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Robert W. Zoller, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report onForm 10-Q/A of Kitty Hawk, Inc.; and
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
Date: November 16, 2004   By: /s/ ROBERT W. ZOLLER, JR.Robert W. Zoller, Jr.Chief Executive Officer and President
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 033-79720, No. 033-79722, No. 033-94768, No.333-05613 No.333-05615 and No. 333-109767) pertaining to the 1994 Director Option Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 2003 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors and the 1997 Stock Option Plan of Point Therapeutics, Inc. of our report datedFebruary 17, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Point Therapeutics, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

 

March 10, 2004
# CE2004078EN.01040301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/403 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/403

---

(2004/C 78 E/0425)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2405/03

by Bart Staes (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(21 July 2003)

Subject:   Motor-vehicle insurance

Subject:

On 19 June 2003, the Belgian Insurance Ombudsman presented her annual report. In the evaluation of her report, the Ombudsman was reported in the newspaper ‘De Standaard’ to have noted that young people, above all, as well as elderly drivers were being systematically refused insurance or that their policies were being swiftly cancelled if they made a claim.

In its answer to Oral Question H-0525/02 (1), the Commission stated that free trade in insurance products was in the interests of the vast majority of motorists who could choose the insurance company which rewarded good drivers by charging lower premiums.

1

With a view to ensuring that drivers in general and young drivers in particular may secure affordable third-party liability insurance cover, the new Belgian Government is proposing that insurance companies should be required to offer new drivers policies valid for a period of five years or longer.

Does the Commission acknowledge that this refusal of cover for principally young drivers but also for elderly drivers is in breach of the spirit of Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the virtually identical Article II-21 of the Draft Treaty establishing a European Constitution? If so, what measures will it take to prevent such discrimination? If not, what arguments can it put forward in support of this manifest discrimination on the ground of age?

Does the Commission acknowledge that young and elderly drivers find it particularly difficult to secure motor-vehicle insurance and that the free trade in insurance products does not, therefore, benefit this considerable group of motorists? If so, what measures will it take on behalf of consumers? If not, what arguments can it put forward to underpin its divergent point of view?

Is the Commission aware of the Belgian Government's intention to require insurers to offer new drivers policies valid for five years or more? Is that requirement in compliance with Community law? If not, what alternatives will the Commission propose so that young drivers in particular may nevertheless secure affordable (compulsory) third-party liability insurance?

---

(1)  Oral answer given on 3 September 2002.

1

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Louis L. Knickerbocker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and William C.
Hitchcock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Louis L. Knickerbocker              /s/ William C. Hitchcock
------------------------------          ----------------------------
Louis L. Knickerbocker                  William C. Hitchcock
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2007                       February 14, 2007
In the matter of S.M.M.

No. COA15-1295.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 21, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Vacated.