alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Louis L. Knickerbocker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,and William C. Hitchcock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectivelycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Louis L. Knickerbocker |                     | /s/  William C. Hitchcock |   |
|----------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
| Louis L. Knickerbocker     | William  C. Hitchcock    |
| Chief  Executive Officer   | Chief  Financial Officer |
| August 11,  2005      | August 11,  2005    |

 

----
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03- 08 -00 238 -CV In r e Na th an M ac ias ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M COM AL COUNTY M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Relator has filed an e merg ency motion for temporar

y relief and a pe tition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8, 52.10. Havingrevie wed the motion and pe tition, t he re cord, and the r esponse f

iled by the real party in interest, we deny the m otion for tempor ary relief and the pe tit ion fo r wri t of

mand amus .

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Waldrop Filed: May

1, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-07295) of our report dated January 15, 1997, except as to the third
paragraph of Note 2 as to which the date is January 24, 1997, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of SuperGen, Inc. included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 25, 1997
Ricky TURNER v. CHERRY HOSPITAL

No. 403P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 31, 2016

Ricky Turner, for Turner, Ricky.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 26th of October 2016 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wayne County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of October 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         956,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,992,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,196,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,744,000
<PP&E>                                       5,620,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,059,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,927,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    27,719,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,971,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,059,000
<SALES>                                     24,916,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,916,000
<CGS>                                       11,344,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,344,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (1,852,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,283,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,509,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (794,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,441,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,441,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I,
Manuel J. Mehos, the Chief Executive Officer of Coastal Bancorp, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Coastal Bancorp, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for
the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Dated: March 12, 2004 |  | By |  | /s/MANUEL J. MEHOSManuel J. Mehos
Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
# C_2008142EN.01000702.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 April 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Peek & Cloppenburg KG v Cassina SpA

(Case C-456/06) (1)

1

(Copyright - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 4(1) - Distribution to the public by sale or otherwise of the original of a work or a copy thereof - Use of reproductions of copyright-protected furniture as items of furniture exhibited in a sales area and in display windows - No transfer of ownership or possession)

(2008/C 142/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Peek & Cloppenburg KG

Applicant:

Defendant: Cassina SpA

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC and of Article 4(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10) — Use, without the consent of the copyright holder, of reproductions of copyright-protected items of furniture as furnishings arranged in a sales area and for decorative display purposes — Whether such use, which does not involve any form of transfer of ownership or possession, does or does not constitute a ‘form of distribution to the public’

Operative part of the judgment

The concept of distribution to the public, otherwise than through sale, of the original of a work or a copy thereof, for the purpose of Article 4(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, applies only where there is a transfer of the ownership of that object. As a result, neither granting to the public the right to use reproductions of a work protected by copyright nor exhibiting to the public those reproductions without actually granting a right to use them can constitute such a form of distribution.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 
  

 
 



 
 2014 Yodle Executive Bonus Plan Document 

The 2014 Yodle Executive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) is designed to motivate and reward outstanding individual achievement among the executive team,
subject to the performance of Yodle, Inc. (the “Company”). This Plan document describes how the Company funds the aggregate bonus pool (the “Bonus Pool”). Any individual allocations are subject to the discretion of the Board of
Directors (the “Board”) and your manager. 
 Eligibility: To be eligible for bonus consideration, you must be employed by the Company as an
executive (1) for at least 30 days during the applicable bonus period and (2) through the last day of the applicable bonus period. 
 Target:
Your annual target is a percentage of your base salary (the “Annual Target”). Your Annual Target will be prorated for any portion of a bonus period if you joined the Company, or became eligible to participate in this Plan, after a
bonus period has begun. Target amounts, as adjusted as set forth below, determine the amount that will be added to the Bonus Pool. Any allocation from the Bonus Pool to you is subject to the discretion of the Board and your manager. 

Company Performance: Company Performance is based on the Company’s attainment of results against an annual operating plan, based on revenue growth
and Adjusted EBITDA targets. If the established revenue growth target is not achieved, then the Bonus Pool will not be funded. If the revenue target is achieved and the Bonus Pool is funded, then the amount to fund the Bonus Pool depends on the
level of revenue growth and the level of achievement of the Adjusted EBITDA target. The revenue and Adjusted EBTIDA targets are at the discretion of the Board. 

Bonus Pool Adjustment Based on Company Performance: 100% of the amount to fund the Bonus Pool for the executive team is subject to
Company Performance. 
 Bonus Periods: The annual bonus period runs from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. Bonuses under this Plan are
measured and paid annually; provided that the Bonus Pool may be funded with up to twenty-five percent (25%) of the aggregate Annual Targets for all executives and paid to executives in August 2014 at the discretion of the Board based on the
Company’s recent and expected results. 
 Allocation and Payment: Factors that will influence Board and manager discretion include achievement
of goals, performance against job standards or objectives, adherence to Yodle values, and other performance criteria. Any bonus awarded to you will be paid no later than 60 days after the end of the bonus period. 

General: All payments are subject to all applicable deductions and withholdings. This Plan does not constitute an employment contract and your
employment remains “at will”, meaning that you and the Company each retain the right to terminate your employment at any time, for any reason, without notice. This Plan may be modified or terminated by the Company’s Board at
any time with or without notice.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
7/th/ Level, Inc.:


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated March 17, 1999, included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements Files No. 333-65525, No. 333-10335,
No. 033-87944, No. 333-10341, No. 333-10339 filed on Forms S-8 and No. 333-64365
filed on Form S-3.
 

                                                  Arthur Andersen LLP


New York, New York
March 29, 1999
Order entered April 26, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00413-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.O., ET AL., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-19769-Z

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal in a child protection case. Pursuant to rule of appellate 

procedure 34.5(c)(1), we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than 

April 30, 2019, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the trial court’s July 26, 2018 

“Chapter 263” order and August 24, 2018 “extend misc” order.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and the 

parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
State v. Greggory G. Mosher, Jr.

242P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Greggory G. Mosher, Sr., for Mosher, Greggory George (Jr.).

Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*780The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of June 2016 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-10245

____________________

KVK-TECH, INC., 

Plaintiff-Counter

Defendant-Appellant,

versus

NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant-Counter

Claimant-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

USCA11 Case: 22-10245 Document: 43-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 22-10245

D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cv-00286-KD-C

____________________

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, ABUDU, and ED CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Following our careful review of the record, the parties’

briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the district court. 

The language of the insurance policies in this case required 

KVK-Tech, Inc. (“KVK-Tech”), an opioid manufacturer, to provide 

notice to Navigators Specialty Insurance Company (“Navigators”), 

an excess insurance carrier, when a covered claim was “first made” 

against it during the policy period or “as soon as practicable.” It is 

undisputed that KVK-Tech had notice of the first-made opioid lawsuit against it on or before August 31, 2017—while the 2017-18 

Navigators policy was in effect. As the district court correctly 

found, KVK-Tech had thirty days from the expiration of the 2017-

18 Navigators policy, i.e., until September 20, 2018, to provide notice of that claim against it to Navigators. It is also undisputed that 

KVK-Tech notified other excess carriers of other opioid lawsuits 

that were pending against it on June 25, 2019. Yet KVK-Tech failed 

to notify Navigators of any of the opioid lawsuits against it until 

January 27, 2020—despite having notice nearly three years earlier

and notifying other excess carriers of the opioid lawsuits against it 

on June 25, 2019. In sum, KVK-Tech failed to provide timely notice 

USCA11 Case: 22-10245 Document: 43-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 2 of 3
22-10245 Opinion of the Court 3

to Navigators. Therefore, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district 

court. 

USCA11 Case: 22-10245 Document: 43-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 3 of 3
**Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2007 – PTV v OHIM**

**(Case C‐512/06 P)**

Appeal – Community trade mark – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctiveness – Word mark ‘map&guide’

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctiveness of sign (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 24, 26, 41)

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 10 October 2006 in Case T-302/03, | PTV | v | OHIM | (map&guide), dismissing the action for annulment of the decision which refused the application for registration of the word mark ‘map&guide’ in respect of certain goods and services in Classes 9, 41 and 42 – Distinctiveness of the mark. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | The appeal is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG is ordered to pay the costs. |
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55335-55336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 091405E]


Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
AtmosphericAdministration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of decision and availability of decision documents on 
the issuance of Endangered Species Act (ESA) research/enhancement 
Permit 1520 for takes of endangered species.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that a scientific research 
permit has been issued to the Confederated Tribes of the Colville 
Reservation, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), and 
that the decision documents are available upon request.

DATES: Permit 1520 was issued on August 10, 2005, subject to certain 
conditions set forth therein. The permit expires on December 31, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the decision documents or any of the 
other associated documents should be directed to the Salmon Recovery 
Division, NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service, 1201 N.E. Lloyd 
Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, Oregon

[[Page 55336]]

97232. The documents are also available on the Internet at 
www.nwr.noaa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristine Petersen, Portland, OR, at 
phone number: (503) 230-5409, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f241d061c1b06010a413f0a1b0a1d1c0a012f01000e0e41080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afe4ddc6dcdbc6c1ca81ffcadbcadddccac1efc1c0cece81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is relevant to the following 
species and evolutionarily significant units (ESUs):
    Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss): endangered Upper Columbia River.

    Dated: September 15, 2005.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05-18752 Filed 9- 20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Nies v. Town of Emerald Isle

409PA 15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 1, 2016

J. David Breemer, Attorney at Law, Keith P. Anthony, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Nies, Gregory P., et al.

Brian E. Edes, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, Norwood P. Blanchard, III, Attorney at Law, J. Allen Jernigan, Attorney at Law, for Town of Emerald Isle.

Elliot Engstrom, Attorney at Law, for Civitas Institute Center for Law and Freedom.

Robert H. Thomas, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, Jason T. Campbell, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Owners' Counsel of America, et al.

James Patrick Longest, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Surfrider Foundation.

Geoffrey R. Gisler, Attorney at Law, Derb S. Carter, Jr., Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Southern Environmental Law Center.

Mary Louise Lucasse, Special Deputy Attorney General, for N.C. Coastal Resources Commission.

Todd S. Roessler, Attorney at Law, Phillip A. Harris, Jr., Attorney at Law, Joseph S. Dowdy, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Joseph J. Kalo, Attorney at Law, Amy Y. Bason, General Counsel, Walter Derrickson Taylor, Attorney at Law, Neil B. Whitford, Attorney at Law, Morehead City, Garris Neil Yarborough, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, Charles S. Lanier, Attorney at Law, Jacksonville, Carl W. Thurman, III, Attorney at Law, Stephen D. Coggins, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney, John C. Wessell, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte Noel Fox, Attorney at Law, A. A. Canoutas, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, Robert V. Shaver, Jr., Attorney at Law, *797Charles S. Baldwin, IV, Attorney at Law, Justin K. Humphries, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, Michael R. Isenberg, Attorney at Law, Southport, G. Grady Richardson, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Graham Kenan Professor of Law Emeritus Joseph Kalo, et al.

John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina Ex Rel. Attorney General Roy Cooper.

J. Mitchell Armbruster, Attorney at Law, B. Davis Horne, Jr., Attorney at Law, Eva G. Frongello, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for N.C. Travel and Tourism Coalition, et al.

Sam Hayes, Attorney at Law, David B. Efird, Deputy General Counsel, Beth A. Onyenwoke, Attorney at Law, Kevin V. Howell, Attorney at Law, for Department of Environmental Quality, et al.

Benjamin Marshall Gallop, Attorney at Law, John D. Leidy, Attorney at Law, Elizabeth City, Robert B. Hobbs, Jr., Attorney at Law, Nags Head, Donald I. McRee, Jr., Currituck County Attorney, Ronald G. Baker, Attorney at Law, Ahoskie, Casey C. Varnell, Attorney at Law, for County of Dare, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st of August 2016 by Russell Walker f or leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief :

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of September 2016."
STATE v. James L. JOHNSON.

No. 151P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 22, 2016.

Jeffrey William Gillette, for Johnson, James.

*484J. Rick Brown, Associate Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

J. Joy Strickland, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of April 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of April 2016."