alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 26, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Rehearing No. 552 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

133394 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Justices Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 133394 

 COA: 267565 

Oakland CC: 05-064732-AA 

STATE TAX COMMISSION and 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 

QUALITY,
 

Respondents-Appellees,

and 

CITY OF AUBURN HILLS,

 Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motions for rehearing are considered, and they are 

DENIED.

 WEAVER, CORRIGAN, and MARKMAN, JJ., would grant rehearing and affirm the 

Court of Appeals. 

0923 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 26, 2008 

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet September 16, 2005 in Willits, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Approval of minutes, (2) Public Comment, (3) Sub-committees (4) Discussion—items of interest (5) Discussion/approval of projects, (6) next agenda items and meeting date. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on September 16, 2005, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo Road, Covelo, CA 95428. (707) 983-8503; e-mail                         *rhurt@fs.fed.us*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff by September 12, 2005. Public will have the opportunity to address the Committee at the meeting. 

Dated: August 24, 2005. 

Blaine Baker, 

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 05-17495 Filed 9-1-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
March28, 2012

**CONSENT OF ENGINEERS**

Referenceis made to the Annual Information Form to be included in the Annual Report onForm 40-F (collectively, the “40-F”) of Nevsun Resources Ltd. to be filed withthe United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Theundersigned hereby consent to (i) the references to each of their names in the40-F as having prepared the report entitled “Nevsun Resources Limited, BishaPolymetallic Operation Eritrea, Africa, NI 43-101 Technical Report”  dated01 January 2011, revised 29 March 2011, and (ii) to the use of the report inthe 40-F.

| */s/  David Thomas*____________________David Thomas                                                                                                | */s/  Vikram Khera*____________________  Vikram Khera    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                    |                                                          |
| On behalf of:AMEC Americas  Limited*/s/  Steve Toevs*____________________  By: Steve Toevs  Vice President Finance   Natural Resources Americas    |                                                          |

----
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 






 
  

					
	 *<<CERTNO>>*
	  	 Incorporated Under the

Laws of the state of Delaware

October 2, 2006
	  	 *<<SHARESNO>>*


 LENDINGCLUB CORPORATION 

The corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests the powers, designations,
preferences and relative, participating, optional or special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT PROOF <<isare>> the <owners>> of *<<Written_Shares>>* Shares of
the COMMON STOCK of 
 LendingClub Corporation 

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the «holders» hereof in person or by Attorney, upon
surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this
certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this «DayMo yr>> day of «DayMo Yr>>. 

			
	 <<Signer_1>>
	  	 <<Signer_2>>


 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RESRTICTIVE LEGENDS 

NO C5
                    BARON CORPORATE SUPPLIES 








									
	 For value Received,
                     hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
                                         
                            Shares of the Common Stock of the within named Corporation, represented by the
within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint                      Attorney to transfer the said shares of said Common
Stock on the books of the said Corporation, pursuant to the provisions of the By-Laws thereof, with full powers of substitution in the premises.
	  	 



 

	 	  	 	  	Dated	  	                             
     A.D.             	  
	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  
	In Presence of:
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Novelos Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Harry S. Palmin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joanne M. Protano, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:




1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Harry S. PalminHarry S. PalminPresident, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date: May 13, 2011/s/ Joanne M. ProtanoJoanne M. ProtanoChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date: May 13, 2011
Alan SAVAGE v. Julie Anne ZELENT a/k/a Julie Anne Phillips a/k/a Julie A. McSwain.

No. 394P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Jeffrey S. Miller, Jacksonville, for Zelent, Julie Anne (aka).

Daniel G. Cahill, Raleigh, for Savage, Alan.

Caroline P. Mackie, Raleigh, for Savage, Alan.

Andrew H. Erteschik, Raleigh, for Savage, Alan.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of November 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  INCOME  STATEMENT  AND  BALANCE  SHEET  DATED  JUNE  30,  1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                                 924 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,794 
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0 
<INVENTORY>                                          8,713 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    11,547 
<PP&E>                                               2,033 
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      13,846 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,755 
<BONDS>                                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                            20,645 
<OTHER-SE>                                               0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        13,846 
<SALES>                                             10,626 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10,626 
<CGS>                                                6,447 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,447 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,767 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (32)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                         (3841)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.44)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2007235EN.01003201.xml

| 6.10.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/32

---

Action brought on 6 August 2007 — Dittert v Commission

(Case F-82/07)

(2007/C 235/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Daniel Dittert (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: B. Cortese and C. Cortese, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities to promote the applicant to grade AD 9, and not AD 10, under the 2006 promotion procedure, as confirmed by that Institution's decision of 23 April 2007, rejecting the applicant's complaint No R/132/07; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities to promote the applicant to grade AD 9, and not AD 10, under the 2006 promotion procedure, as confirmed by that Institution's decision of 23 April 2007, rejecting the applicant's complaint No R/132/07;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, an established official at the Commission, having been promoted to the old grade A 7 with effect from 1 April 2002, was on 30 April 2004 eligible for promotion to grade A 6. On 1 May 2004, the Appointing Authority replaced grade A 7 in the applicant's staff file with the new grade A*8, stating the reason for the amendment to be the ‘career reform of 1 May 2004’. Subsequently, grade A*8 was renamed AD 8 with effect from 1 May 2006.

The applicant submits that though the officials promoted in 2004 and those promoted in 2005 or 2006 from the old grade A 7 were all promoted after the entry into force of the amendments to the Staff Regulations, some were appointed to grade A*10/AD 10 while others, including the applicant, were appointed to grade A*9/AD 9. The applicant pleads an infringement of the principles of equal treatment and reasonable career prospects for officials.

---
# C_2009282EN.01003201.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/32

---

Order of the President of the Court of 16 July 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Livadia Court of First Instance (Greece) — Panagiotis Koskovolis, Ekaterini Pappa v Municipality of Kiriaki

(Case C-467/07) (1)

1

2009/C 282/55

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 22.12.2007.

1

---
.. ' l Ave.~ 201~ 3~ .s7JS-oL{ 

G..rzxJtM:' gp-' cfiMoJf4.L fffp~ ~lECrE~V~D ~~ ~, Af::>a ittcas'l14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

fc.O _ ·e:o): I 'L3D~ · 

f.i-usn1't1 , l( ~~ /'0711 

AUG 14 2015 

bbWL~: ~~~ .. As,:( f>Jr\ {WQ:: !1-PPUCAMY' W 1Hte PrP:rJif~-S-?1~ ~ ~ 

NiuA.~L C.V~"hlTL'-1 M &w_ ~ .1KLs. fr>Jdl ~ {J,~&vLL.r..l Khm).uas.-r-

~ou .k1r~ ~ AJCJT'l£' 1tYz_ ·cfvtB ~~t.{l1~ foUDWtJG- AiJntZl:!Sb. f!HA~frt 

{!JL.}) flli~Q_~;: ~tr{LDJ ~ .. ~Jlhfc~ Pfq7(o6L.7 

6~ c<.~ u ALL"l. 1l"'hcr -~ 

-2\ FM 2-t-f/ 

KuAi'TS. VtLUL. t( ~AS /73ZD 

.{o <> .. 

fJ(~( 1~WL1~~ ~v{QA( f:Z"' bt~?'jq70o2/ S1'tL.11Jtf-V<a...L..D\IJ U1U c.f, --r~CX ....:['~ 

ILDD -fr1 &5!1 f'loS~ttl't'Z.LliJ, 1' ~~ -?IS3~
Marvin Bowens Green, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

April 6, 2016

ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on September 28, 2015 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Maite Murphy be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Murphy shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where she may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Murphy shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55396-55397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as 
amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) 
and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of 
Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

[[Page 55397]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               License No.                         Name/address                       Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
017236N.................................  Simpson's Shipping             June 20, 2005.
                                           Enterprise, 248 West Lincoln
                                           Drive, Mount Vernon, NY
                                           10050.
015797N.................................  United Cargo Handling A/S dba  August 23, 2002.
                                           United Cargo Lines,
                                           Strandagervej 10, DK 2900,
                                           Hellerup, Denmark.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 05-18823 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
# CE2004088EN.01044201.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/442 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/442

---

(2004/C 88 E/0450)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2956/03

by Bart Staes (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(8 October 2003)

Subject:   Increased financial support for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)

Subject:

Although the US State Department cleared the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) of accusations of abortion and forced sterilisation, the US House of Representatives decided on Tuesday, 23 July not to make any further contributions to the Fund. As a result, the Fund will be deprived of nearly USD 100 million in 2004 and 2005.

The Fund helps developing countries to improve gynaecological healthcare and is an important body in the fight against population explosion and other demographic trends that lead to poverty. One of the Fund's responsibilities in this area is (advice on) contraception. The cancellation of American contributions will lead to two million unwanted pregnancies and 800 000 abortions going unprevented. It is estimated that thousands of mothers will die in childbirth and children at birth for lack of resources.

What is the Commission's view of this step by the USA, and has it made its position known to the US Administration?

Is the Commission prepared to provide UNFPA with extra financial support so that countless lives can be saved?

If so, how much will the Commission make available?

If not, why not?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(19 November 2003)

(19 November 2003)

The Commission is very disappointed at the decision taken by the United States House of Representatives to end contributions to the UNFPA. The Commission fully supports the policies set out in the Programme of Action adopted at the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo. The Commission considers that this latest decision by the United States House of Representatives puts implementation of the Programme at risk.

The Commission has supported UNFPA projects on many occasions. Last year the Commission financed a project to support UNFPA for EUR 20 million as part of a EUR 32 million package for sexual and reproductive health agreed after earlier cuts in United States support. A further EUR 12 million has been set aside for an extension of this programme. The Commission is also ready to review any proposals received from UNFPA in the call for proposals launched under Regulation (EC) No 1567/2003 of the Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on aid for policies and actions on reproductive and sexual health and rights in developing countries (1). In the draft budget for 2004, this budget line has been increased to EUR 17,8 million in order to respond to increased needs in this field.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 224, 6.9.2003.

1

---
# C_2009282EN.01004701.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/47

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 2009 — Viasat Broadcasting UK v Commission

(Case T-16/05) (1)

1

(State aid - Recapitalisation of a public service broadcaster following a first decision ordering the recovery of incompatible State aid - Decision not to raise objections - Annulment of the first decision - No need to adjudicate)

2009/C 282/89

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd (West Drayton, Middlesex, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Hjelmborg and M. Honoré, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and M. Niejahr, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: SBS TV A/S, formerly TV Danmark A/S (Skovlunde, Denmark); and SBS Danish Televsion Ltd, formerly Kanal 5 Denmark Ltd (Hounslow, Middlesex, United Kingdom) (represented inititially by D. Vandermeersch, K.-U. Karl, K. Nordlander and H. Peytz, and subsequently by D. Vandermeersch, K.-U. Karl and H. Peytz, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the applicant

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark, (represented by: J. Molde, Agent, and by P. Biering and K. Lundgaard Hansen, lawyers); and TV 2/Danmark A/S (Odense, Denmark) (represented by: O. Koktvedgaard and M. Thorninger, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 3632 final of 6 October 2004 relating to the recapitalisation of TV 2/Danmark A/S.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate on this action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate on this action;

| 2. | Each party is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

1

---
# Assignment of Functions with Respect to Loan Guarantees to Egypt

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, I hereby assign to the Secretary of State the functions conferred upon the President relating to loan guarantees to Egypt in paragraph (2) under the heading “Economic Support Fund” in chapter 5 of title I of the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003 (Public Law 108-11). 

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

[FR Doc. 05-18740

Billing code 4710-10-P