alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009006EN.01000701.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 November 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Efrosyni Alexiadou

(Case C-436/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Contract concerning a technological development programme relating to the production of water-repellent leather - Repayment of advance paid - Interest)

(2009/C 6/12)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agent)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Efrosyni Alexiadou (represented by: Ch. Matellas and E. Alexiadou, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 12 July 2007 in Case T-312/05 Commission v Alexiadou [2007] ECR II-86, in which the Court dismissed an action under an arbitration clause seeking an order that the defendant reimburse the amount of the advance paid by the Commission under a contract concerning a technological development programme relating to the production of water-repellent leather (Contract No G1ST-CT-2002-50227).

Commission

Alexiadou

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 12 July 2007 in Case T-312/05 Commission v Alexiadou [2007], which was notified to the Commission on 18 July 2007; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 12 July 2007 in Case T-312/05 Commission v Alexiadou [2007], which was notified to the Commission on 18 July 2007;

| 2. | Orders that the case be referred back to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders that the case be referred back to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities;

| 3. | Orders that the costs be reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders that the costs be reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.

1

---
*       *        *       *       *


EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Huaren Organic Products, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




China Huaren Organic Products, Inc.
 Date : November 20, 2009
/s/Yushu Cao
 Yushu
Cao, Chief Executive Officer
 and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 29, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE FIFTY-TWO WEEK
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,883,991
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,861,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,291,907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,985,196
<PP&E>                                      11,058,793
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,754,202
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,191,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,313,194
<BONDS>                                     40,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (6,797,042)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,191,423
<SALES>                                     33,645,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,042,497
<CGS>                                       18,615,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,930,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,941,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,421,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                   886,790
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            534,557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   534,557
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPT 10, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-15433

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00121-CR-FTM-99-DNF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

HOWARD HENRY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(September 10, 2008)

Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Carl A. Johnston, appointed counsel for Howard Henry, has filed a motion to

withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of

the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Henry’s

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Sylvester Eugene HARDING, III.

No. 402P11-8.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 18, 2016.

Jonathan Shaw, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

*483Sylvester Eugene Harding, for Harding, Sylvester Eugene.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 13th of April 2016 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cumberland County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th of April 2016 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cumberland County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------




     Certifications pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
                               United States Code

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, each of the undersigned officers of Maxcor Financial Group Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("registrant"), does hereby certify to the best of such
officer's knowledge, that:

         1. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2004 (the "Form 10-Q") of the registrant fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.



Dated:  August 13, 2004                      /s/ GILBERT D. SCHARF
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Gilbert D. Scharf
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August 13, 2004                      /s/ STEVEN R. VIGLIOTTI
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Steven R. Vigliotti
                                             Chief Financial Officer

                              Page 35 of 35 Pages
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135930 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 135930 

 COA: 279209 

Wayne CC: 99-010643-01

MICHAEL BERNARD HOLLINGSWORTH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
DICKSON, et al. v. RUCHO.

No. 201PA12-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 16, 2015.

Phillip J. Strach, Raleigh, for Rucho, Robert et al.

Edwin Speas, Raleigh, Anita S. Earls, for Dickson, Margaret, et al.

Thomas A. Farr, Raleigh.

Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina, et al.

Susan K. Nichols, Special Deputy Attorney General.

John W. O'Hale, Raleigh, Guardian ad Litem.

Caroline P. Mackie, Raleigh.

Allison J. Riggs.

Clare Barnett.

Adam Stein, Chapel Hill, Victor Goode, for North Carolina State Conference of Branches of the NAACP, et al.

John A. Bussian, Raleigh, for NC Press Association, Inc.

Mark J. Prak, Raleigh, for N.C. Association of Broadcasters, Inc.

Charles E. Coble, Raleigh.

Dorrian H. Horsey.

Hugh Stevens, for N.C. Open Government Coalition, Inc.

Geraldine Sumter, Charlotte, Terry Smith, Pro Hac Vice, for N.C. Legislative Black Caucus.

David Lambeth, Durham, for David Lambeth.

Mark A. Finkelstein, Matthew Nis Leerberg, Raleigh, for Election Law Professors.

H. Jefferson Powell, for N.C. Law Professors.

Paul M. Smith, Chapel Hill, Pro Hac Vice, for Election Law Professors.

Jessica Ring Amunson, Pro Hac Vice, for Election Law Professors.

Ms. Leah J. Tulin, Pro Hac Vice, for Election Law Professors.

Michelle R. Singer, Pro Hac Vice, for Election Law Professors.

Kareem Crayton, Pro Hac Vice, for N.C. Legislative Black Caucus.

Meghann K. Burke, Michael E. Casterline, Asheville, for Congressional Black Caucus.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of June 2015 by Pietro Signoracci for Admission Pro Hac Vice:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of June 2015."
State v. Melissa Amber Dalton

336PA15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 13, 2016

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill, for Dalton, Melissa Amber.

Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, Greg Newman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law, Chapel Hill.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 10th of June 2016 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of June 2016."

*5Defendant shall have up to and including the 20th day of July 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Richard L. Coleman, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

September 12, 2016

**431ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on December 12, 2014 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Alison Renee Lee be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Lee shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where she may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Lee shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 18, 1998; THE CONDENSED 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 24 WEEKS ENDED APRIL 18, 1998; 
AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE WEEKS ENDED 
APRIL 18, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-18-1998
<CASH>                                           3,755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                       928
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,794
<PP&E>                                          40,207
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,092
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,499
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,008
<SALES>                                        282,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               283,720
<CGS>                                          220,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  274,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (167)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   465
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,290
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,936
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,936
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32<F1>
<FN>
<F1>On May 7, 1998 the Board of Directors declared a three-for-two common stock
split effected in the form of a stock dividend payable on May 29, 1998 to
shareholders of record at the close of business on May 18, 1998. All share and
per share data in the condensed consolidated financial statements have been
retroactively adjusted for the stock split.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008022EN.01004402.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/44

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2007 — Xentral v OHIM — Pages jaunes (PAGESJAUNES.COM)

(Case T-134/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark PAGESJAUNES.COM - Earlier national figurative mark LES PAGES JAUNES - Domain name ‘pagesjaunes.com’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 22/82)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Xentral LLC (Florida, United States) (represented by: A. Bertrand, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Pages jaunes SA (Sèvres, France) (represented by: C. Bertheux Scotte, B. Potot and B. Corne, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 February 2006 (Case R 708/2005-1) in respect of opposition proceedings between Pages Jaunes SA and Xentral LLC.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Xentral LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Xentral LLC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

1

---
STATE v. Danny Lamont AVERY.

No. 269P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Danny Avery, Bunn, for Avery, Danny Lamont.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of July 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
State of North Carolina v. Larry Cook

No. 114P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Michael E. Casterline, Attorney at Law, Asheville, Larry Cook, for Cook, Larry.

David P. Brenskelle, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 30th of March 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
STATE of North Carolina, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth John MOSTELLER, Defendant.

No. COA16-9.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error in Part; Vacated and Remanded in Part.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2008 – General Química and Others v Commission**

**(Case T-85/06)**

Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Sector of chemical products for the treatment of rubber – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Exchange of confidential information and price-fixing – Attribution to the parent company – Joint and several liability – Fines – Cooperation notice

1.                     *Competition – Community rules – Infringements – Attribution – Parent company and subsidiaries – Single economic entity – Criteria
for assessment (Arts 81 EC and 82 EC) (see paras 58-59, 61-62, 82)*

2.                     *Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Gravity of the infringement – Horizontal cartel concerning prices
(Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2); Commission Notice No 98/C 9/03, point 1 A) (see paras 102-107)*

3.                     *Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Need to differentiate between the undertakings involved in the same
infringement by reference to their overall turnover – None (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23(2); Commission Notice No
98/C 9/03, point 1 A, sixth para.) (see paras 110-112)*

4.                     *Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Turnover to be taken into account in calculating the fine (Council Regulation
No 1/2003, Art. 23(2); Commission Notice No 98/C 9/03, point 1 A, sixth para.) (see para. 113)*

5.                     *Competition – Fines – Assessment by reference to the individual conduct of the undertaking – Irrelevant that another operator
not penalised – (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Arts 7 and 23) (see paras 117-118)*

6.                     *Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Assessment of the degree of cooperation provided by each of the
undertakings during the administrative procedure (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23(2); Commission Notice No 2002/C 45/03,
title B) (see paras 146-147, 150, 154‐155)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2006/902/EC of 21 December 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement against Flexsys NV, Bayer AG, Crompton Manufacturing Company Inc. (former Uniroyal Chemical Company Inc.), Crompton Europe Ltd, Chemtura Corporation (former Crompton Corporation), General Química SA, Repsol Química SA and Repsol YPF SA (Case No COMP/F/C.38.443 — Rubber chemicals) (OJ 2006 L 353, p. 50), and, alternatively, the reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders General Química, SA, Repsol Química, SA and Repsol YPF, SA to bear their own costs and pay the Commission’s costs. |
# C_2008092EN.01004601.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/46

---

Order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 1 February 2008 — Nomura Principal Investment and Nomura International v Commission

(Case T-233/05) (1)

1

(2008/C 92/90)

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 3.9.2005.

1

---
Stephen C. NICHOLSON, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Geraldine Anne Nicholson v. Arleen Kaye THOM, M.D.

No. 378P11-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

James W. Musselwhite, Lumberton, Clifford Britt, Winston-Salem, John Allyn Chilson, for Nicholson, Stephen C., et al

Dan J. McLamb, Raleigh, Andrew C. Buckner, for Thom, Arleen Kaye (M.D.).

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 22nd of December 2014 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> *88"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

Ervin, J. recused.