alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-07-00193-CR

______________________________

TOMMIE LOYD PRATER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court

Fannin County, Texas

Trial Court No. 22064

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
Prater appeals from eight convictions. In cause number 06-07-00187-CR, he appeals from 1

his conviction of indecency with a child (A.C.P.) by sexual contact; in cause numbers 06-07-00188-

CR through 06-07-00192-CR, he appeals his convictions of sexual assault of a child (A.C.P.). In

each of these cases, Prater was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment, to run consecutively, and

$10,000.00 fines.

Prater appeals his conviction in cause number 06-07-00193-CR of indecency with a child

(J.A.P.) by sexual contact. Prater was sentenced in this case to twenty years' imprisonment, to run

consecutively, and a $10,000.00 fine.

Prater also appeals his conviction in cause number 06-07-00194-CR of aggravated sexual

assault of a child (T.L.P.). He was sentenced to life imprisonment, to run consecutively, and a

$10,000.00 fine.

2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Tommie Loyd Prater has brought eight separate appeals from eight jury convictions for 1

various sexually related activities. In this appeal, from trial court number 22064, he was convicted

of indecency with a child by sexual contact (J.A.P., a child under fourteen years of age) by touching

her genitals on or about August 1, 2006. He was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment and a

$10,000.00 fine. 

Upon reviewing the brief, we find one contention of error relevant to all convictions

involving victim A.C.P., and two contentions of error relevant to the conviction involving victim

T.L.P. There are no arguments or issues raised that are relevant to Prater's conviction in the instant

case. Accordingly, with no allegation of error being shown in connection with this conviction, there

is nothing for this Court to review.
3

We affirm the judgment.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: August 8, 2008

Date Decided: September 15, 2008

Do Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 175 (Monday, September 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Public Meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax 
Reform

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Change in meeting date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises all interested persons of change in the 
date of a public meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal 
Tax Reform.

DATES: The meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, September 15, 
2005, has been postponed. This meeting will be rescheduled and 
announced at a later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Panel staff at (202) 927-2TAX 
(927-2829) (not a toll-free call) or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92fbfcf4fdd2e6f3eae0f7f4fde0ffe2f3fcf7febcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e777078715e6a7f666c7b78716c736e7f707b7230797168">[email protected]</span></a> 
(please do not send comments to this box). Additional information is 
available at http://www.taxreformpanel.gov.

    Dated: September 8, 2005.
Mark S. Kaizen,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18143 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4811-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3057024-FEB-201208:45 AM
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Ralph M. Amato, certify that:



1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of BoysToys.com, Inc.



2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.



3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this Quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.



4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period which this report is being prepared; and



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|Dated:  November 9, 2005 | By:  /s/ Ralph M. Amato         Ralph M. Amato
         Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-79720, 33-79722, 33-79772, 33-94772, 33-94768,
333-05613, 333-05615) of HemaSure Inc. of our report dated March 20, 2001
relating to the financial statements which appears in this Amended Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A.

                                          /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
April 10, 2001
Exhibit
      10.24


**AMENDMENT
      TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**








**AMENDMENT
      NO. 1** dated as
      of November 23, 2004 between **BERRY
      PLASTICS CORPORATION,** a
      Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and **G. ADAM UNFRIED** (the
      "Employee").







Reference
      is made to the Employment Agreement dated as of November 22, 1999 (the
      "Employment Agreement"), between the Corporation and the Employee. The
      Corporation and the Employee desire to extend the term of the Employment
      Agreement. All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall
      have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment
      Agreement.




Accordingly,
      in consideration of the mutual covenants and premises contained herein and
      other
      good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
      acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:




1.  Term .
      Section
      2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
      follows:




"Subject
      to earlier termination as provided herein, the employment of the Employee
      hereunder shall commence on the Commencement Date, and terminate on December
      31,
      2009 (the "Expiration Date"). Such period of employment is hereinafter referred
      to as the "Employment Period."




2.  Effect
      of Amendment **.** Except
      as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
      force
      and effect and unchanged.




3.  Counterparts **.** This
      Amendment No. 1 may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which
      shall
      be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the
      same instrument.




**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF** ,
      the
      parties have hereunto set their hands as of the date first written
      above.




**BERRY
      PLASTICS CORPORATION**








By:   
      /s/ Ira G. Boots


Ira
      G.
      Boots


President
      and Chief Executive Officer








/s/ G. Adam Unfried


G.
      Adam
      Unfried
----

(2004/C 78 E/0551)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3367/03

by Avril Doyle (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 November 2003)

Subject:   Laser technology and radiation emissions

Laser technology has developed dramatically over the past 10 years for the manufacture of steel parts for the engineering sector. Is the Commission aware that such laser technoogy is generated by means of Light Amplification by Stimulated Emissions of Radiation and that the substances included in the process with electromagnetic dust are expelled into the atmosphere.

By comparison, ‘Waterjet’ uses only water and sand to carry out exactly the same process, only more slowly. However, this process is totally environmentally friendly and produces no exhaust fumes.

Can the Commission indicate whether any funding is available for such environmentally friendly engineering processes or indicate any further avenues which might be explored for funding opportunities.

Answer given by Mr Busquin on behalf of the Commission

(19 December 2003)

Concerning Laser and Waterjet cutting applications, the Commission is well aware of the benefits and drawbacks associated with both technologies.

A search through the Cordis projects database (http://dbs.cordis.lu/search/en/simple/EN_PROJ_simple.html) reveals that a significant number (more than 20) of waterjet technology related projects have been financed in various programmes of the past Framework Programmes. Due to the relative maturity of the laser and waterjet cutting applications, the currently on-going activities in the Industrial Technologies Directorate are few and they concentrate on more specialised areas (e.g. G1ST-CT-2002, Development of abrasive water jet removal method for hard coatings to replace environmentally dangerous chemical stripping; G1RD-CT2002-00746, (Laser) Machining of transparent materials by multiple absorption).

In the Sixth Framework Programme, the Nanotechnologies and nano-sciences, knowledge-based multi-functional materials and new production processes and devices (NMP) priority could provide funding opportunities for further Waterjet technology related research, provided that the Research and Technological Development (RTD) proposals are able to demonstrate sufficient innovation and significant progress beyond the current state-of-the-art. More generally, the NMP priority work programme includes a dedicated research domain to improve sustainability of industrial manufacturing as well as to reduce environmental and health impacts.

----
EXHIBIT 23.1



Stan J.H. Lee, CPA



|
|









To Whom It May Concern:





The firm of Stan J.H. Lee, Certified Public Accountants, consents to the inclusion of our report of May 10, 2011, on the interim reviewed consolidated financial statements of Environmental Credits Ltd, as of March 31, 2011 and for the 3-months period then ended in any filings that are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.







Very truly yours,

/s/ Stan J.H. LeeStan J.H. Lee, CPA

May 10, 2011
Fort Lee, NJ 07024



|Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Member of the New Jersey Society of CPAs
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2008 – Commission v Greece**

**(Case C‐293/07)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directives 79/409/EEC and 92/43/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Special protection areas – Insufficient measures of protection

1.                     *Environment – Conservation of wild birds – Directive 79/409 – Special conservation measures (Council Directive 79/409, Art.
4(1) and (2), and Art. 4(4), as amended by Directive 92/43, Art. 6(2) to (4)) (see paras 21-23, 36, operative part 1)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Proof of failure – Burden of proof on Commission (see para. 32)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Articles 4(1) and (2) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 1979 L 103, p. 1), in conjunction with Article 4(4) of that directive, as amended by Article 6(2) to (4) of Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7) – Lack of protection for Special Protection Areas (SPAs) – Existence of activities likely to damage the integrity of SPAs and have negative consequences for the objectives of conservation of SPAs and of the species for which the areas have been defined. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

1.                     Declares that, by failing to take all the measures necessary to establish and apply a coherent, specific and integrated legal
regime capable of ensuring sustainable management and effective protection of areas designated as Special Protection Areas,
in the light of the conservation objectives of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds,
the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(1) and (2), in conjunction with the first sentence
of Article 4(4) of that directive, as amended by Article 6(2) to (4) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21May 1992 on the conservation
of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora;

2.      Dismisses the remainder of the action;

3.      Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-588-804, A-559-801)


Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results and Final 
Results of the Full Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Orders on 
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan and Singapore

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 21, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev Primor at 202-482-4114 or Fred W. 
Aziz at 202-482-4023, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.

Extension of Time Limits

    In accordance with section 751(c)(5)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended (the Act), the U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department) 
may extend the period of time for making its determination by not more 
than 90 days, if it determines that the sunset review is 
extraordinarily complicated. As set forth in 751(c)(5)(C)(v) of the 
Act, the Department may treat a sunset review as extraordinarily 
complicated if it is a review of a transition order. The sunset reviews 
subject to this notice are transition orders. Therefore, the Department 
has determined, pursuant to section 751(c)(5)(C)(v) of the Act, that 
these sunset reviews are extraordinarily complicated and require 
additional time for the Department to complete its analysis.
    The Department's preliminary results of these full sunset reviews 
were scheduled for September 19, 2005, and the final results were 
scheduled for January 27, 2006. They are now being extended until 
December 19, 2005, and April 27, 2006, respectively. These dates are 90 
days from the original scheduled dates of the preliminary and final 
results of these sunset reviews.
    This notice is issued in accordance with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and 
(C)(v) of the Act.

    Dated: September 15, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-18852 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
(BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-SP)
State v. Jonathan Eugene Brunson

247P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Jonathan Eugene Brunson, For Brunson, Jonathan Eugene.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of June 2016 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
Kim F. Satterfield, Plaintiff v. Henry C. Satterfield, Defendant

No. COA15-1194

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
exv10w27w1








Exhibit 10.27.1




[Company Letterhead]



[Date], 2010




[Robert
Aquilina][Clyde Swoger][Raman
Kumar][Michael Seedman] 
[Executive Chairman][Chief Financial Officer] [Vice Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer]
[Chief Technology Officer]



Re: Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of August [   ], 2008



Dear [Bob][Clyde][Raman][Michael]:



CBay Inc. (the “Company”) previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of August [ ],
2008 (the “Agreement”) with you, pursuant to which the Company agreed to provide you with certain
bonus payments, upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement. As discussed with you,
in light of recent events, the Company has determined that it is not in the best interests of and
impracticable for the Company to timely pay such bonus amounts to you when such amounts are due
under the current terms and conditions of the Agreement. In connection with the foregoing, you and
the Company hereby agree to amend certain provisions of the Agreement, effective as of the date
hereof, to permit the Company to defer payment of such bonuses to you until a later date in the
2010 calendar year pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth below in this letter agreement.
Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned to such terms
under the Agreement.





	1.	 	Section 4(a) of the Agreement is amended by adding thereto the following:
	 
	 	 	“Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to the performance bonus
payment in respect of fiscal year 2009 in an amount equal to $[___________]
(the “2009 Performance Bonus”), the Company shall pay Executive the 2009
Performance Bonus as soon as practicable during the 2010 calendar year, but
in no event later than December 31, 2010. In addition, from March 31, 2010
until the date such payment is made (the “Performance Bonus Payment Date”),
interest shall accrue on such amount at a rate of seven percent (7%) per
annum, which interest shall become payable to you on the Performance Bonus
Payment Date. The 2009 Performance Bonus and any interest thereon shall be
paid to you in cash. The obligations of the Company in this Section
4(a) with respect to payment of the 2009 Performance Bonus are absolute and
not subject to any action or inaction on the part of the Company or
Executive”
	 
	2.	 	Except as expressly set forth above, your Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,

CBAY Inc.	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 










	 	 	 	 	 

	ACCEPTED and
AGREED:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	[Robert Aquilina]  [Clyde Swoger]  [Raman
Kumar]  [Michael Seedman]
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18551]



[[Page 54955]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1604-DR]


Mississippi; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1604-DR), dated August 29, 2005, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 11, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include Categories C 
through G under the Public Assistance program for the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of August 29, 2005:

    Adams, Amite, Claiborne, Clarke, Copiah, Covington, Forrest, 
Franklin, George, Greene, Hancock, Harrison, Hinds, Jackson, Jasper, 
Jefferson, Jefferson Davis, Jones, Kemper, Lamar, Lauderdale, 
Lawrence, Leake, Lincoln, Lowndes, Madison, Marion, Neshoba, Newton, 
Noxubee, Oktibbeha, Pearl River, Perry, Pike, Rankin, Scott, 
Simpson, Smith, Stone, Walthall, Wayne, Wilkinson, and Winston 
Counties for Public Assistance [Categories C-G] (already designated 
for Individual Assistance and debris removal and emergency 
protective measures [Categories A and B] under the Public Assistance 
program, including direct Federal assistance.)


(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-18551 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P