alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Anthony Willis, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

March 30, 2016

ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on January 12, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Michael G. Nettles be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Nettles shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Nettles shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 797-798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-186]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Agency Information Collection Extension

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE), pursuant to the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, intends to extend for three years, an 
information collection package with the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) concerning legal collections related to invention reporting by 
DOE contractors, and related matters. Comments are invited on: (a) 
Whether the extended collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether 
the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the

[[Page 798]]

proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology.

DATES: Comments regarding this proposed information collection must be 
received on or before March 7, 2005. If you anticipate difficulty in 
submitting comments within that period, contact the person listed below 
as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be sent to: Robert J. Marchick, GC-62, 
U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 
20585; or by fax at 202 586-2805, or by e-mail at 
[email protected] and to: Sharon Evelin, Acting Director, IM-
11/Germantown Bldg., U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., 
SW., Washington, DC 10585-1290, or by fax at 301-903-9061 or by e-mail 
at [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should 
be directed to Robert Marchick at the address listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This package contains: (1) OMB No. 1910-
0800; (2) Package Title: Legal Collections; (3) Type of Review: 
Renewal; (4) Purpose: To continue to maintain DOE control and oversight 
of DOE and contractor invention reporting; (5) Respondents: Approx. 
1894 respondents; (6) Estimated Number of Burden Hours: Approx. 14100 
hours.

    Statutory Authority: 42 U.S.C. 5908 (a) and (b)

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 27, 2004.
Sharon Evelin,
Acting Director, Records Management Division, Office of the Chief 
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-186 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
# C_2010037EN.01003602.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/36

---

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2009 — Inet Hellas v Commission

(Case T-107/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Implementation of the ‘.eu’ top-level domain - Registration of the domain ‘.co’ as a second-level domain - Non-actionable measure - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 37/49

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Inet Hellas Ilektroniki Ipiresia Pliroforion EPE (Inet Hellas) (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Chatzopoulos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Zavvos and E Montaguti, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision supposedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 31 January 2004 concerning the rejection by the body responsible for the organisation, administration and management of the ‘.eu’ top-level domain of the applicant’s request for registration of ‘.co’ as a second-level domain.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Inet Hellas Ilektroniki Ipiresia Pliroforion EPE (Inet Hellas) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Inet Hellas Ilektroniki Ipiresia Pliroforion EPE (Inet Hellas) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 12.8.2006.

1

---
Clark, II v. Department of Public Safety

190P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 27, 2016

Joseph Earl Clark, II, for Clark, Joseph Earl (II).

Kristin Jo Uicker, Attorney at Law, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of May 2016 by Petitioner for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of May 2016."
Robin Leann McNeely, Plaintiff v. Byron Rico Hart, Defendant.

No. COA15-1274

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

VACATED AND REMANDED.
# C_2009180EN.01001201.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ústi nad Labem — Czech Republic) — RLRE Tellmer Property s.r.o. v Finanční ředitelství v Ústí nad Labem

(Case C-572/07) (1)

1

(Preliminary references - VAT - Exemption for lettings of immovable property - Cleaning of common parts related to the letting - Ancillary supplies)

2009/C 180/19

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Krajský soud v Ústi nad Labem

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RLRE Tellmer Property s.r.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanční ředitelství v Ústí nad Labem

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Krajský soud v Ústí nad Labem (Czech Republic) — Interpretation of Articles 6 and 13 B(b) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Scope of the VAT exemption on the letting of immovable property — Inclusion of costs for cleaning the common parts of an apartment block.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

For the purposes of applying Article 13B(b) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, the letting of immovable property and the cleaning service of the common parts of the latter must, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, be regarded as independent, mutually divisible operations, so that the said service does not fall within that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.

1

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2303

_____________________________

BILLY LEE BOONE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

October 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Billy Lee Boone, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-41132

Conference Calendar

 

GASPAR GARCIA,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ERNEST V. CHANDLER, Warden

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CV-542

- - - - - - - - - -

April 11, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Gaspar Garcia, federal prisoner # 64529-079, appeals from

the district court’s judgment dismissing his application for a

writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

Because Garcia’s application challenged the validity of his

sentence, his challenge should be brought only under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255, unless he made a showing that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 provided

an inadequate and ineffective remedy. See Cox v. Warden, Fed.

Detention Ctr., 911 F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir. 1990). Garcia

fails to make this necessary showing with his argument that,
No. 00-41132

-2-

because Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), was rendered

after he had filed his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, and because the

stringent requirements for filing successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motions would prevent him from raising a challenge to his

sentence based on Apprendi in a second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion,

it is in effect an inadequate remedy. This argument is without

merit. The Apprendi decision is limited to facts that increase a

defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum. Id., 120 S.

Ct. at 2362-63. Because Garcia pleaded guilty to conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute in excess of 1000 kilograms of

marijuana, the maximum sentence was life in prison. 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(b)(1)(A). His sentence of 151 months is below the

statutory maximum. Apprendi does not apply. 

The district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

application is AFFIRMED.
CONSENT OF SNOWDEN MINING INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS





To:

British Columbia Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

Autorité des marchés financiers

Toronto Stock Exchange

American Stock Exchange

US Securities and Exchange Commission





I, Andrew F. Ross, on behalf of Snowden Mining Industry Consultants, do hereby consent to the use of the name Snowden and information derived from the Segala Technical Report dated May 17, 2004, into the annual information form (the AIF) of Nevsun Resources Ltd. (the Issuer) dated March 22, 2007 to be filed with certain Canadian securities commissions and the incorporation of the AIF into Form 40-F (the 40-F) of the Issuer to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection therewith.

I also certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Segala Technical Report or that the written disclosure in the AIF or the 40-F of the Issuer contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in the Technical Report.

Dated this 29th day of March, 2007.



/s/ Andrew F. Ross

_______________________
Andrew F Ross PGeo

General Manager

Snowden Mining Industry Consultants
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1605-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1605-DR), dated  August 29, 2005, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 10, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 29, 2005: 

Bibb, Colbert, Cullman, Lamar, Lauderdale, Marion, Monroe, Perry, Wilcox, and Winston Counties for Public Assistance. 

Greene and Pickens Counties for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance.) 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary,  Emergency Preparedness and Response,  Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05-18554 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Exhibit 23

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors
Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-103962, 333-85426, 333-57492
and 333-20363) of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of February 1, 2003 and January 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report
appears in the January 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.

/s/
KPMG LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
April 14, 2004

---

QuickLinks
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00303

- CR
Marcus Layne Dickey

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 299th District Court of Travis County , Texas Trial Cause No. D

- 1

- DC

- 15

- 904016

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered t his cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 21, 2016
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3773 

To extend the emergency unemployment compensation program until January 

1, 2015. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2013 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the emergency unemployment compensation 

program until January 1, 2015. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unemployment Bene5 fits Extension Act of 2013’’ or the ‘‘Unemployed 

6 Jobhunters Protection and Assistance Act of 2013’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EMERGENCY UNEMPLOYMENT COM8 PENSATION PROGRAM. 

9 (a) EXTENSION.—Section 4007(a)(2) of the Supple10 mental Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110–252; 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3773 IH

1 26 U.S.C. 3304 note) is amended by striking ‘‘January 

2 1, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2015’’. 

3 (b) FUNDING.—Section 4004(e)(1) of the Supple4 mental Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110–252; 

5 26 U.S.C. 3304 note) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (I), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

7 the end; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (J), by inserting ‘‘and’’ at 

9 the end; and 

10 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (J) the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(K) the amendment made by section 2(a) 

13 of the Unemployment Benefits Extension Act of 

14 2013;’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact17 ment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (Public 

18 Law 112–240). 

19 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

20 It is the sense of Congress that the House of Rep21 resentatives and the Senate should reconvene on or before 

22 December 18, 2013, to take appropriate action to enact 

23 this legislation. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Berry Plastics Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan D. Rich, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.











/s/ Jonathan D. Rich


Jonathan D. Rich


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





Date:   December 17, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Coastal Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Manuel J. Mehos, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Dated: March 12, 2004 |  | By |  | /s/MANUEL J. MEHOSManuel J. Mehos
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------





(A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coastal Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Coastal Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)

---

QuickLinks
STATE of North Carolina, Plaintiff, v. Travis Terrell BLACKMON, Defendant.

No. COA15-1374.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
# C_2012319EN.01000601.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/6

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2012 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-394/06) (1)

1

(EAGGF - ‘Guarantee’ section - Clearance of accounts - Expenditure excluded from financing - Irregularities or negligence attributable to administrations or bodies of Member States - Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 and Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 - Excessive delay in the assessment by the Commission of the communications sent pursuant to Article 5(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 - Reasonable time-limit)

2012/C 319/07

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Aiello, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission (represented by: C. Cattabriga, acting as Agent, and M. Moretto, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision 2006/678/EC of 3 October 2006 concerning the financial treatment to be applied, in the context of clearance of expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section, in certain cases of irregularity by operators (OJ 2006 L 278, p. 24).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.

1

---
Dimple Bailey, Plaintiff, v. David H. McCorkle, Defendant.

No. COA16-105

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

AFFIRMED.
# C_2008142EN.01002101.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 March 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Berlin — Germany) — Irene Werich v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund

(Case C-111/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 142/34)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---