UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

---

Form 10-Q

|(Mark one)                                   |                                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ý                                            | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
|For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2006
|or                                          
|o                                            | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|For the transition period from
 to          

Commission file number 333-68630

---

EDISON MISSION ENERGY(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|Delaware                                                       |  | 95-4031807                          
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1700
Irvine, California         |  | 92612                               
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                          

Registrant's
telephone number, including area code:(949) 752-5588

---

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. YES ý    NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
"accelerated filer" and "large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer ý


Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). YES o    NO ý

Number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock as of August 8, 2006: 100 shares (all shares held by an affiliate of the registrant).



---



TABLE OF CONTENTS

|                               |  |                                                                                       |  | Page
|------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|PART I  Financial Information
|Item 1.                        |  | Financial Statements                                                                  |  | 1   
|Item 2.                        |  | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |  | 24  
|Item 3.                        |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk                            |  | 55  
|Item 4.                        |  | Controls and Procedures                                                               |  | 55  
|PART II  Other Information   
|Item 1.                        |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                     |  | 56  
|Item 1A.                       |  | Risk Factors                                                                          |  | 56  
|Item 6.                        |  | Exhibits                                                                              |  | 56  
|                               |  | Signatures                                                                            |  | 57  

---





PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)  (In millions, Unaudited)

|                                         |                                                                          | Three Months Ended
June 30,  |     | Six Months Ended
June 30, |     
|---------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------- | --- | ------------------------- | ----
|
|Operating Revenues                       |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|                                         | Electric revenues                                                        |                              | $   | 427                       |     
|                                         | Net gains from price risk management and energy trading                  |                              |     | 24                        |     
|                                         | Operation and maintenance services                                       |                              |     | 8                         |     
|                                         | Other revenues                                                           |                              |     | 4                         |     
|                                         |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|                                         |                                                                          | Total operating revenues     |     |                           | 463 
|                                         |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|Operating Expenses                       |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|                                         | Fuel                                                                     |                              |     | 142                       |     
|                                         | Plant operations                                                         |                              |     | 147                       |     
|                                         | Plant operating leases                                                   |                              |     | 44                        |     
|                                         | Operation and maintenance services                                       |                              |     | 8                         |     
|                                         | Depreciation and amortization                                            |                              |     | 36                        |     
|                                         | Asset impairment charges                                                 |                              |     |                          |     
|                                         | Administrative and general                                               |                              |     | 33                        |     
|                                         |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|                                         |                                                                          | Total operating expenses     |     |                           | 410 
|                                         |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|                                         | Operating income                                                         |                              |     | 53                        |     
|                                         |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|Other Income (Expense)                   |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|                                         | Equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates                          |                              |     | 46                        |     
|                                         | Interest income                                                          |                              |     | 23                        |     
|                                         | Other income (expense), net                                              |                              |     | 11                        |     
|                                         | Gain on sale of assets                                                   |                              |     |                          |     
|                                         | Loss on early extinguishment of debt                                     |                              |     | (143                      | )   
|                                         | Interest expense                                                         |                              |     | (73                       | )   
|                                         |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|                                         |                                                                          | Total other income (expense) |     |                           | (136
|                                         |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|                                         | Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes             |                              |     | (83                       | )   
|                                         | Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                     |                              |     | (40                       | )   
|                                         |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations |                                                                          |                              | (43 | )                         |     
|                                         | Income from operations of discontinued subsidiaries, net of tax (Note 7) |                              |     | 4                         |     
|                                         |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     
|Net Income (Loss)                        |                                                                          | $                            | (39 | )                         | $   
|                                         |                                                                          |                              |     |                           |     

The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1

---



EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME  (In millions, Unaudited)

|                                               |                                                                         | Three Months Ended
June 30,                                                                                                                                                                                             |     | Six Months Ended
June 30, |   
|---------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ------------------------- | --
|
|Net Income (Loss)                              |                                                                         | $                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | (39 | )                         | $ 
|Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |     |                           |   
|                                               |                                                                         | Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of income tax effect                                                                                                                                                          |     |                           | (2
|                                               | Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives qualified as cash flow hedges: |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |     |                           |   
|                                               |                                                                         | Other unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period, net of income tax expense (benefit) of $45 and $12 for the three months and $172 and $(43) for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively |     |                           | 67
|                                               |                                                                         | Reclassification adjustments included in net income (loss), net of income tax expense (benefit) of $(12) and $2 for the three months and $8 and $5 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively        |     |                           | 17
|                                               |                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |     |                           |   
|Other comprehensive income (loss)              |                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | 82  |                           |   
|                                               |                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |     |                           |   
|Comprehensive Income                           |                                                                         | $                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | 43  |                           | $ 
|                                               |                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |     |                           |   

The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

---





EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS  (In millions, Unaudited)

|                                         |                                                                                | June 30,
2006                     |       | December 31,
2005
|---------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------- | ----- | -----------------
|Assets                                   |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  
|Current Assets                           |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  
|                                         | Cash and cash equivalents                                                      |                                   | $     | 1,328            
|                                         | Short-term investments                                                         |                                   |       | 260              
|                                         | Accounts receivabletrade                                                      |                                   |       | 191              
|                                         | Accounts receivableaffiliates                                                 |                                   |       | 161              
|                                         | Inventory                                                                      |                                   |       | 183              
|                                         | Assets under price risk management and energy trading                          |                                   |       | 152              
|                                         | Margin and collateral deposits                                                 |                                   |       | 240              
|                                         | Deferred taxes                                                                 |                                   |       | 16               
|                                         | Prepaid expenses and other                                                     |                                   |       | 64               
|                                         |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  
|                                         |                                                                                | Total current assets              |       |                  
|                                         |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  
|Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates |                                                                                |                                   | 373   |                  
|                                         |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  
|Property, Plant and Equipment            |                                                                                |                                   | 3,997 |                  
|                                         | Less accumulated depreciation and amortization                                 |                                   |       | 913              
|                                         |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  
|                                         |                                                                                | Net property, plant and equipment |       |                  
|                                         |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  
|Other Assets                             |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  
|                                         | Deferred financing costs                                                       |                                   |       | 48               
|                                         | Long-term assets under price risk management and energy trading                |                                   |       | 105              
|                                         | Restricted cash                                                                |                                   |       | 121              
|                                         | Rent payments in excess of levelized rent expense under plant operating leases |                                   |       | 506              
|                                         | Long-term margin and collateral deposits                                       |                                   |       | 96               
|                                         | Other long-term assets                                                         |                                   |       | 93               
|                                         |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  
|                                         |                                                                                | Total other assets                |       |                  
|                                         |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  
|Total Assets                             |                                                                                | $                                 | 7,021 |                  
|                                         |                                                                                |                                   |       |                  

The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

---



EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS  (In millions, Unaudited)

|                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                | June 30,
2006             |       | December 31,
2005 |    
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----- | ----------------- | ---
|Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity                                 |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|Current Liabilities                                                  |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|                                                                     | Accounts payableaffiliates                                                                                                                    |                           | $     | 17                |    
|                                                                     | Accounts payable                                                                                                                               |                           |       | 56                |    
|                                                                     | Accrued liabilities                                                                                                                            |                           |       | 171               |    
|                                                                     | Liabilities under price risk management and energy trading                                                                                     |                           |       | 119               |    
|                                                                     | Interest payable                                                                                                                               |                           |       | 30                |    
|                                                                     | Current maturities of long-term obligations                                                                                                    |                           |       | 130               |    
|                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                | Total current liabilities |       |                   | 523
|                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|Long-term obligations net of current maturities                      |                                                                                                                                                |                           | 3,294 |                   |    
|Deferred taxes and tax credits                                       |                                                                                                                                                |                           | 304   |                   |    
|Long-term liabilities under price risk management and energy trading |                                                                                                                                                |                           | 26    |                   |    
|Other long-term liabilities                                          |                                                                                                                                                |                           | 588   |                   |    
|                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|Total Liabilities                                                    |                                                                                                                                                |                           | 4,735 |                   |    
|                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|Minority Interest                                                    |                                                                                                                                                |                           | 44    |                   |    
|                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|Commitments and Contingencies(Note 11)                               |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|Shareholder's Equity                                                 |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|                                                                     | Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 10,000 shares authorized; 100 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 |                           |       | 64                |    
|                                                                     | Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                     |                           |       | 2,212             |    
|                                                                     | Accumulated deficit                                                                                                                            |                           |       | (62               | )  
|                                                                     | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)                                                                                                  |                           |       | 28                |    
|                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|Total Shareholder's Equity                                           |                                                                                                                                                |                           | 2,242 |                   |    
|                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    
|Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity                           |                                                                                                                                                | $                         | 7,021 |                   | $  
|                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                |                           |       |                   |    

The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

---



EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions, Unaudited)

|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Six Months Ended
June 30,                                     |      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | -----
|
|Cash Flows From Operating Activities                                    |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Net income                                                                              |                                                               | $    
|                                                                        | Less: Income from discontinued operations                                               |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Income from continuing operations, net                                                  |                                                               | $    
|                                                                        | Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates                  |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Depreciation and amortization                                 |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Deferred taxes and tax credits                                |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Gain on sale of assets                                        |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Loss on early extinguishment of debt                          |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Asset impairment charges                                      |      
|                                                                        | Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                                            |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Decrease (increase) in margin and collateral deposits         |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable                    |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Increase in inventory                                         |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Decrease in prepaid expenses and other                        |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Increase in rent payments in excess of levelized rent expense |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Decrease in accounts payable                                  |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Decrease in accrued liabilities                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Decrease in interest payable                                  |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | (Increase) decrease in net assets under risk management       |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Other operatingassets                                        |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Other operatingliabilities                                   |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               | 397  
|                                                                        | Operating cash flow from discontinued operations                                        |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities           |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|Cash Flows From Financing Activities                                    |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Borrowings on long-term debt                                                            |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Payments on long-term debt agreements                                                   |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Repayment of loan by parent                                                             |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Cash dividends to parent                                                                |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Payments for price appreciation on stock options exercised                              |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Excess tax benefits related to stock option exercises                                   |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Premium paid on extinguishment of debt and financing costs                              |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Net cash used in financing activities                         |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|Cash Flows From Investing Activities                                    |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Capital expenditures                                                                    |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Proceeds from return of capital and loan repayments                                     |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Purchase of interest of acquired companies                                              |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Proceeds from sale of interest in projects                                              |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations                                           |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Purchase of short-term investments                                                      |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Maturities and sales of short-term investments                                          |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Decrease (increase) in restricted cash                                                  |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Turbine deposits                                                                        |                                                               |      
|                                                                        | Proceeds from (investments in) other assets                                             |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               | (158 
|                                                                        | Investing cash flow from discontinued operations                                        |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         | Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities           |      
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|Effect of consolidation of variable interest entities on cash           |                                                                                         |                                                               |     
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                    |                                                                                         |                                                               | 173  
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                        |                                                                                         |                                                               | 1,155
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                              |                                                                                         |                                                               | 1,328
|Cash and cash equivalents classified as part of discontinued operations |                                                                                         |                                                               |     
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      
|Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations                      |                                                                                         | $                                                             | 1,328
|                                                                        |                                                                                         |                                                               |      

---

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

---





EDISON MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  JUNE 30, 2006  (Unaudited)

Note 1. General

In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including recurring accruals, have been made that are necessary to fairly state the consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006
are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

Edison
Mission Energy's (EME's) significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to its Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, included
in EME's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. EME follows the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes, with the exception of the
change in accounting for stock-based compensation (explained below). This quarterly report should be read in connection with such financial statements. Terms used but not defined in this report are
defined in EME's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

On
April 1, 2006, EME received, as a capital contribution, ownership interests in a portfolio of wind projects located in Iowa and Minnesota and a small biomass project. See
Note 6Acquisitions and ConsolidationsAcquisitions, for further discussion. These projects were previously owned by EME's affiliate, Edison Capital. Edison Mission
Group is a subsidiary of Edison International and is the holding company for its wholly owned subsidiaries, Mission Energy Holding Company (MEHC) and Edison Capital. MEHC is the holding company of its
wholly owned subsidiary EME. EME accounted for this acquisition at Edison Capital's historical cost as a transaction between entities under common control. Therefore, these consolidated financial
statements include the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the acquired projects as though EME had such ownership throughout the periods presented.

Stock-Based Compensation

EME's stock-based compensation plans primarily include the issuance of Edison International stock options and performance shares. Edison International usually
does not issue new common stock for equity awards earned. Rather, a third party is used to facilitate the exercise of stock options and the purchase and delivery of outstanding common stock for
settlement of performance shares earned. The amount of cash used to settle stock options exercised was $6 million and $13 million for the second quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively,
and $19 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. No cash was used to settle performance shares classified as equity awards in the second quarters of 2006 and 2005,
and $10 million and $4 million was used for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Edison International has approximately 13.7 million shares remaining
for future issuance under its stock-based compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 13Stock Compensation Plans.

Prior
to January 1, 2006, EME accounted for these plans using the intrinsic value method. Upon grant, no stock-based compensation cost for stock options was reflected in net
income, as the grant date was the measurement date, and all options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
Previously, stock-based compensation cost for performance shares was remeasured at each reporting period and related compensation expense was adjusted. As discussed in Note 14New
Accounting Pronouncements,

6

---



effective
January 1, 2006, EME implemented a new accounting standard that requires companies to use the fair value accounting method for stock-based compensation resulting in the recognition of
expense for all stock-based compensation awards. EME recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. EME recognizes stock-based compensation
expense for awards granted to retirement-eligible participants as follows: for stock-based awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, EME recognized stock-based compensation expense over the
explicit vesting period and accelerated any remaining unrecognized compensation expense when a participant actually retired; for awards granted or modified after January 1, 2006 to participants
who are retirement-eligible or will become retirement-eligible prior to the end of the normal vesting period for the award, stock-based compensation is recognized on a prorated basis over the initial
year or over the period between the date of grant and the date the participant first becomes eligible for retirement. If EME recognized stock-based compensation expense for awards granted prior to
January 1, 2006, over a period to the date the participant first became eligible for retirement, there would be no significant changes to stock-based compensation expense for the second
quarters of 2006 and 2005 and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

Total
stock-based compensation expense (reflected in the caption "Administrative and general" on the consolidated statements of income) was $2 million and $7 million for
the second quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $4 million and $12 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The income tax benefit recognized
in the income statement was $1 million and $3 million
for the second quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $2 million and $5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The
following table illustrates the effect on net income if EME had used the fair value accounting method for the second quarter of 2005 and six months ended June 30, 2005.

Three Months Ended
June 30, 2005

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2005(in millions)Net income, as reported

$
40

$
104Add: stock-based compensation expense using the intrinsic value accounting methodnet of tax


4


7Less: stock-based compensation expense using the fair value accounting methodnet of tax


(3
)

(6
)Pro forma net income

$
41

$
105


Reclassifications

Certain prior year reclassifications have been made to conform to the current year financial statement presentation. Except as indicated, amounts reflected in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements relate to continuing operations of EME.

Revisions

EME revised its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to separately disclose the operating and investing portion of
the cash flows attributable to its discontinued operations consistent with its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in EME's annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. EME had previously reported these amounts on a combined basis in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
six months ended June 30, 2005.

7

---



Note 2. Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market. Inventory at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 consisted of the following:

June 30,
2006

December 31,
2005(in millions)Coal and fuel oil

$
139

$
77Spare parts, materials and supplies


44


43Total

$
183

$
120


Note 3. Short-term Investments

Held-to-Maturity Securities

At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, EME had marketable debt securities that were classified as held-to-maturity and
carried at amortized cost plus accrued interest which approximated their fair value.

Held-to-maturity
securities, which all mature within one year, consisted of the following:

June 30,
2006

December 31,
2005(in millions)Commercial paper

$
197

$
99Certificates of deposit


59


34Time deposits





50Corporate bonds


4


Total

$
260

$
183


Note 4. Refinancing

Credit Agreement

On June 15, 2006, EME replaced its $98 million credit agreement with a new credit agreement that provides for a $500 million senior secured
revolving loan and letter of credit facility and matures on June 15, 2012. Loans made under this credit facility bear interest, at EME's election, at either LIBOR (which is based on the
interbank Eurodollar market) or the base rate (which is calculated as the higher of Citibank, N.A.'s publicly announced base rate and the federal funds rate in effect from time to time plus 0.50%)
plus, in both cases, an applicable margin. The applicable margin depends on EME's debt ratings. As of June 30, 2006, EME had available the full amount of borrowing capacity under this credit
facility. The credit facility contains financial covenants which require EME to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum corporate debt to corporate capital ratio. A failure to meet a
ratio threshold could trigger other provisions, such as mandatory prepayment provisions or restrictions on dividends.

As
security for its obligations under this credit facility, EME pledged its ownership interests in the holding companies through which it owns its interests in the Illinois Plants, the
Homer City facilities, the Westside projects and the Sunrise project. EME also granted a security interest in an account into

8

---



which
all distributions received by it from the Big 4 projects will be deposited. EME will be free to use these proceeds unless an event of default occurs under the credit facility.

Senior Notes Offering

On June 6, 2006, EME completed a private offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.50% senior notes due June 15, 2013 and
$500 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.75% senior notes due June 15, 2016. EME will pay interest on the senior notes on June 15 and December 15 of each year,
beginning on December 15, 2006. The senior notes are redeemable by EME at any time at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of, plus accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages,
if any, on, the senior notes plus a "make-whole" premium.

The
senior notes are EME's senior unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment to all of EME's existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, and will be senior to all of
EME's future subordinated indebtedness. EME's secured debt and its other secured obligations are effectively senior to the senior notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt or
other obligations. None of EME's subsidiaries have guaranteed the senior notes and, as a result, all the existing and future liabilities of EME's subsidiaries are effectively senior to the senior
notes.

EME
used the net proceeds of the offering of the senior notes, together with cash on hand, to purchase $369 million in aggregate principal amount of its 10% senior notes due
August 15, 2008 and $596 million in aggregate principal amount of its 9.875% senior notes due April 15, 2011. The net proceeds of the offering of the senior notes, together with
cash on hand, were also used to pay related tender premiums, consent fees and accrued interest. EME recorded a $143 million loss on early extinguishment of debt during the second quarter of
2006.

Note 5. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:

Unrealized Gains
(Losses) on Cash
Flow Hedges

Minimum
Pension Liability
Adjustment

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)(in millions)Balance at December 31, 2005

$
(210
)
$
(1
)
$
(211
)Current period change


241


(2
)

239Balance at June 30, 2006

$
31

$
(3
)
$
28


Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax, at June 30, 2006, include unrealized gains on commodity hedges primarily related to
Midwest Generation, LLC (Midwest Generation) and EME Homer City Generation L.P. (EME Homer City) futures and forward electricity contracts that qualify for hedge accounting. These gains arise because
current forecasts of future electricity prices in the relevant markets are lower than the contract prices. The decrease in the unrealized losses during the six months ended June 30, 2006
resulted from a decrease in market prices for power.

As
EME's hedged positions for continuing operations are realized, approximately $26 million, after tax, of the net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges at June 30, 2006 are
expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months. Management expects that reclassification of net unrealized gains will offset energy revenue recognized at market prices.
Actual amounts ultimately reclassified into earnings over the next 12 months could vary materially from this estimated amount as a result of

9

---



changes
in market conditions. The maximum period over which a cash flow hedge is designated is through December 31, 2008.

Under
SFAS No. 133, the portion of a cash flow hedge that does not offset the change in value of the transaction being hedged, which is commonly referred to as the ineffective
portion, is immediately recognized in earnings. EME recorded net gains (losses) of approximately $(6) million and $1 million during the second quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively,
and $(17) million and $(3) million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing the amount of cash flow hedges' ineffectiveness for continuing
operations, reflected in net gains from price risk management and energy trading in EME's consolidated income statements.

Note 6. Acquisitions and Consolidations

Acquisitions

Transfer of Wind Projects from an Affiliate

On April 1, 2006, EME received, as a capital contribution, ownership interests in a portfolio of wind projects located in Iowa and Minnesota and a small
biomass project. The acquisition was accounted for as a transaction between entities under common control. As such, the assets and liabilities of the projects acquired were recorded at historical cost
on the acquisition date for a net book value of approximately $76 million. EME's historical financial statements have been adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the acquisition as
though EME had always owned the projects. Summarized results of the projects acquired for periods presented prior to the acquisition date of April 1, 2006 are as follows:

Three Months
Ended March 31,
2006

Three Months
Ended June 30,
2005

Six Months
Ended June 30,
2005(in millions)Total operating revenues

$
4

$
5

$
11Loss before income taxes


(1
)




Benefit for income taxes


(3
)

(2
)

(4
)Income from continuing operations


2


2


4


The principal components of the net book value of assets and liabilities at March 31, 2006 are current assets ($8 million),
property, plant and equipment, net ($156 million), other non-current assets ($42 million), deferred income ($56 million) and deferred income taxes
($59 million).

Wildorado Wind Project

On January 5, 2006, EME completed a transaction with Cielo Wildorado, G.P., LLC and Cielo Capital, L.P. to acquire a 99.9% interest in the Wildorado Wind
Project, which owns a 161 MW wind farm located in the panhandle of northern Texas, referred to as the Wildorado wind project. The acquisition included all development rights, title and interest held
by Cielo in the Wildorado wind project, except for a small minority stake in the project retained by Cielo. The total purchase price was $29 million. As of June 30, 2006, a cash payment
of $18 million had been made towards the purchase price. Total project costs of the Wildorado wind project, excluding capitalized interest, are estimated to be approximately $270 million
with commercial operations expected to begin in April 2007. The acquisition was accounted for utilizing the purchase method. The fair value of the Wildorado wind project was equal to the
purchase price and as a result, the total purchase price was allocated to property, plant and equipment in EME's consolidated balance sheet.

10

---



Consolidations

Variable Interest Entities

In December 2003, the FASB re-issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities" (FIN 46R). FIN 46R defines a variable interest entity as a legal entity whose equity owners do not have sufficient equity at risk or a controlling financial interest in the entity.
Under FIN 46R, the primary beneficiary is the variable interest holder that absorbs a majority of expected losses; if no variable interest holder meets this criteria, then it is the variable interest
holder that receives a majority of the expected residual returns. The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the variable interest entity unless specific exceptions or exclusions are met.

EME
completed a review of the application of FIN 46R to its subsidiaries and affiliates and concluded that it had significant variable interests in variable interest entities as defined
in this Interpretation. As of June 30, 2006, these entities consisted of five equity investments (the Big 4 projects and the Sunrise project) that had interests in natural gas-fired
facilities with a total generating capacity of 1,782 MW. An operations and maintenance subsidiary of EME operates the Big 4 projects, but EME does not supply the fuel consumed or purchase the power
generated by these facilities. EME
determined that it is not the primary beneficiary in these entities; accordingly, EME continues to account for its variable interests on the equity method. EME's maximum exposure to loss in these
variable interest entities is generally limited to its investment in these entities, which totaled $324 million as of June 30, 2006.

Note 7. Divestitures

Dispositions

On March 7, 2006, EME completed the sale of a 25% ownership interest in the San Juan Mesa wind project to Citi Renewable Investments I LLC, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Citicorp North America, Inc. Proceeds from the sale were $43 million. EME recorded a pre-tax gain on the sale of approximately $4 million during the
first quarter of 2006.

Discontinued Operations

Tri Energy Project

On February 3, 2005, EME sold its 25% equity interest in the Tri Energy project pursuant to a Purchase Agreement, dated December 15, 2004, by and
between EME and a consortium comprised of International Power plc (70%) and Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (30%), referred to as IPM, for approximately $20 million. EME recorded an impairment
charge of approximately $5 million during the fourth quarter of 2004 related to the planned disposition of this investment. The sale of this investment had no significant effect on net income
in the first quarter of 2005.

CBK Project

On January 10, 2005, EME sold its 50% equity interest in the CBK project pursuant to a Purchase Agreement, dated November 5, 2004, by and between
EME and Corporacion IMPSA S.A. Proceeds from the sale were approximately $104 million. EME recorded a pre-tax gain on the sale of approximately $9 million during the first
quarter of 2005.

11

---



Lakeland Project

EME previously owned a 220 MW power plant located in the United Kingdom, referred to as the Lakeland project. An administrative receiver was appointed in 2002 as
a result of a default by its counterparty, a subsidiary of TXU Europe Group plc and the project company was subsequently placed in liquidation. In response to its claim against the TXU subsidiary for
damages from the termination of the power sales agreement, the Lakeland project received a settlement of £116 million (approximately $217 million). EME is entitled to receive
the amount of the settlement remaining after payment of creditor claims. As creditor claims have been settled, EME has received to date payments of £13 million (approximately
$24 million) in April 2005, £61 million (approximately $106 million) in the first quarter of 2006, and £9 million (approximately
$16 million) in April 2006. The after-tax income attributable to the Lakeland project was $10 million and $24 million for the second quarters of 2006 and 2005,
respectively, and $83 million and $24 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Beginning in 2002, EME reported the Lakeland project among
discontinued operations and accounts for its ownership of Lakeland Power on the cost method, with earnings being recognized as cash is distributed from the project.

Summarized Financial Information for Discontinued Operations

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, all the projects discussed above are classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income. Summarized results of discontinued operations are as follows:

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2006

2005

2006

2005(in millions)Total operating revenues

$


$


$


$
Income before income taxes and minority interest


7


22


119


22Provision (benefit) for income taxes


3


1


42


(1
)Minority interest











Income from operations of discontinued foreign subsidiaries


4


21


77


23Gain on sale before income taxes











9Gain on sale after income taxes











5


Assets of $1 million and liabilities of $4 million associated with the discontinued operations are included on the consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2005 in other long-term assets and other long-term liabilities, respectively.

Note 8. Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

The following table presents summarized financial information of the significant subsidiary investments in unconsolidated affiliates accounted for by the equity
method. The significant subsidiary investments include the Big 4 projects. The Big 4 projects consist of Kern River Cogeneration

12

---



Company,
Midway-Sunset Cogeneration Company, Sycamore Cogeneration Company and Watson Cogeneration Company.

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2006

2005

2006

2005(in millions)Operating revenues

$
263

$
323

$
572

$
597Operating income


70


87


123


137Net income


67


85


117


132


Note 9. Employee Benefit Plans

Pension Plans

EME previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 that it expected to contribute $14 million to its pension
plans in 2006. As of June 30, 2006, $4 million in contributions have been made. EME continues to expect to contribute $14 million to its pension plans in 2006.

Components
of pension expense are:

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2006

2005

2006

2005(in millions)Service cost

$
4

$
4

$
9

$
9Interest cost


2


2


4


4Expected return on plan assets


(1
)

(2
)

(3
)

(3
)Net amortization and deferral





1





1Total expense

$
5

$
5

$
10

$
11


Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

EME previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 that it expected to contribute $1 million to its
postretirement benefits other than pensions in 2006. As of June 30, 2006, $0.6 million in contributions have been made. EME continues to expect to contribute $1 million to its
postretirement benefits other than pensions in 2006.

Components
of postretirement benefits expense are:

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2006

2005

2006

2005(in millions)Service cost

$


$


$
1

$
1Interest cost


1


1


2


2Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs


(1
)




(1
)

(1
)Amortization of unrecognized loss


1





1


Total expense

$
1

$
1

$
3

$
2


13

---



Note 10. Income Taxes

EME's income tax provision from continuing operations was $1 million and $19 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Income tax benefits are recognized pursuant to a tax-allocation agreement with Edison International. During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, EME recognized
$9 million and $4 million, respectively, of production tax credits related to wind projects and $3 million and $5 million, respectively, related to estimated state income
tax benefits allocated from EIX. During the second quarter of 2005, EME resolved a dispute regarding additional taxes asserted by the Internal Revenue Service during the audit of the
1994-1996 tax returns. As a result of the resolution of this item, EME reversed $11.5 million of accrued taxes, recording this amount instead as a reduction of income taxes during
the second quarter of 2005.

Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies

Contractual Obligations

Long-term Debt

EME's long-term debt maturities as of June 30, 2006 are (in millions):

July through December 2006

$
252007


1332008


512009


6132010


15


These amounts have been updated primarily to reflect EME's financing activities completed during the second quarter of 2006. See
Note 4Refinancing.

Capital Improvements

At June 30, 2006, EME's subsidiaries had firm commitments to spend approximately $157 million during the remainder of 2006 and $33 million in
2007 on capital and construction expenditures. The majority of these expenditures relate to the construction of the Wildorado wind project. Also included are expenditures for boiler header
replacement, dust collection and mitigation system and various other projects. These expenditures are planned to be financed by existing subsidiary credit agreements, cash on hand or cash generated
from operations.

Commercial Commitments

Introduction

EME and certain of its subsidiaries have various financial and performance guarantees and indemnifications which are issued in the normal course of business. As
discussed below, these contracts include performance guarantees, standby letters of credit, guarantees of debt and indemnifications.

Turbine Commitments

At June 30, 2006, in connection with wind projects in development, EME had entered into agreements with turbine vendors securing 235 turbines with
remaining commitments of $110 million in 2006 and $244 million in 2007. In addition, EME had options to acquire an additional 50 turbines for

14

---



delivery
in 2007 that were exercised on July 31, 2006. In July 2006, EME entered into an agreement to purchase 20 turbines from another supplier with options to purchase another 32
turbines for delivery in 2007 subject to certain conditions.

Standby Letters of Credit

At June 30, 2006, standby letters of credit aggregated $25 million and were scheduled to expire as follows: $18 million in 2006 and
$7 million in 2007.

Guarantees and Indemnities

Tax
Indemnity Agreements

In
connection with the sale-leaseback transactions that EME has entered into related to the Powerton and Joliet Stations in Illinois, the Collins Station in Illinois, and the
Homer City facilities
in Pennsylvania, EME and several of its subsidiaries entered into tax indemnity agreements. Under these tax indemnity agreements, these entities agreed to indemnify the lessors in the
sale-leaseback transactions for specified adverse tax consequences that could result in certain situations set forth in each tax indemnity agreement, including specified defaults under the
respective leases. The potential indemnity obligations under these tax indemnity agreements could be significant. Due to the nature of these potential obligations, EME cannot determine a maximum
potential liability which would be triggered by a valid claim from the lessors. EME has not recorded a liability related to these indemnities. In connection with the termination of the Collins Station
lease in April 2004, Midwest Generation will continue to have obligations under the tax indemnity agreement with the former lease equity investor.

Indemnities
Provided as Part of the Acquisition of the Illinois Plants

In
connection with the acquisition of the Illinois Plants, EME agreed to indemnify Commonwealth Edison with respect to specified environmental liabilities before and after
December 15, 1999, the date of sale. The indemnification claims are reduced by any insurance proceeds and tax benefits related to such claims and are subject to a requirement that Commonwealth
Edison take all reasonable steps to mitigate losses related to any such indemnification claim. Due to the nature of the obligation under this indemnity, a maximum potential liability cannot be
determined. This indemnification for environmental liabilities is not limited in term and would be triggered by a valid claim from Commonwealth Edison. Except as discussed below, EME has not recorded
a liability related to this indemnity.

Midwest
Generation entered into a supplemental agreement with Commonwealth Edison and Exelon Generation Company on February 20, 2003 to resolve a dispute regarding interpretation
of its reimbursement obligation for asbestos claims under the environmental indemnities set forth in the Asset Sale Agreement. Under this supplemental agreement, Midwest Generation agreed to reimburse
Commonwealth Edison and Exelon Generation for 50% of specific existing asbestos claims and expenses less recovery of insurance costs, and agreed to a sharing arrangement for liabilities and expenses
associated with future asbestos-related claims as specified in the agreement. As a general matter, Commonwealth Edison and Midwest Generation apportion responsibility for future asbestos-related
claims based upon the number of exposure sites that are Commonwealth Edison locations or Midwest Generation locations. The obligations under this agreement are not subject to a maximum liability. The
supplemental agreement has a five-year term with an automatic renewal provision (subject to the right of either party to terminate). Payments are made under this indemnity upon tender by
Commonwealth Edison of appropriate proof of liability for an asbestos-related settlement, judgment, verdict, or expense. There were approximately 175 cases for which Midwest Generation was potentially

15

---



liable
and that had not been settled and dismissed at June 30, 2006. Midwest Generation had recorded a $66 million liability at June 30, 2006 related to this matter.

The
amounts recorded by Midwest Generation for the asbestos-related liability are based upon a number of assumptions. Future events, such as the number of new claims to be filed each
year, the average cost of disposing of claims, as well as the numerous uncertainties surrounding asbestos litigation in the United States, could cause the actual costs to be higher or lower than
projected.

Indemnity
Provided as Part of the Acquisition of the Homer City Facilities

In
connection with the acquisition of the Homer City facilities, EME Homer City agreed to indemnify the sellers with respect to specific environmental liabilities before and after the
date of sale. EME guaranteed the obligations of EME Homer City. Due to the nature of the obligation under this indemnity provision, it is not subject to a maximum potential liability and does not have
an expiration date. Payments would be triggered under this indemnity by a claim from the sellers. EME has not recorded a liability related to this indemnity.

Indemnities
Provided under Asset Sale Agreements

The
asset sale agreements for the sale of EME's international assets contain indemnities from EME to the purchasers, including indemnification for taxes imposed with respect to
operations of the assets prior to the sale and for pre-closing environmental liabilities. During the second quarter of 2006, EME paid $34 million related to an indemnity to IPM for
matters arising out of the exercise by one of its project partners of a purported right of first refusal. Not all indemnities under the asset sale agreements have specific expiration dates. Payments
would be triggered under these indemnities by valid claims from the sellers or purchasers, as the case may be. At June 30, 2006, EME had recorded a liability of $94 million related to
these matters.

In
connection with the sale of various domestic assets, EME has from time to time provided indemnities to the purchasers for taxes imposed with respect to operations of the asset prior
to the sale. EME has also provided indemnities to purchasers for items specified in each agreement (for example, specific pre-existing litigation matters and/or environmental conditions).
Due to the nature of the obligations under these indemnity agreements, a maximum potential liability cannot be determined. Not all indemnities under the asset sale agreements have specific expiration
dates. Payments would be triggered under these indemnities by valid claims from the sellers or purchasers, as the case may be. EME has not recorded a liability related to these indemnities.

Guarantee
of Brooklyn Navy Yard Contractor Settlement Payments

On
March 31, 2004, EME completed the sale of 100% of the stock of Mission Energy New York, Inc., which held a 50% partnership interest in Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration
Partners, L.P. (referred to as Brooklyn Navy Yard), to BNY Power Partners LLC. Brooklyn Navy Yard owns a 286 MW gas-fired cogeneration power plant in Brooklyn, New York. In
February 1997, the construction contractor asserted general monetary claims under the turnkey agreement against Brooklyn Navy Yard. A settlement agreement was executed on January 17,
2003, and all litigation has been dismissed. EME agreed to indemnify Brooklyn Navy Yard and, in connection with the sale of EME's interest in Brooklyn Navy Yard, BNY Power Partners for any payments
due under this settlement agreement, which are scheduled through January 2007. At June 30, 2006, EME had recorded a liability of $4 million related to this indemnity.

16

---



Capacity Indemnification Agreements

EME
has guaranteed, jointly and severally with Texaco Inc., the obligations of March Point Cogeneration Company under its project power sales agreements to repay capacity payments
to the project's power purchaser in the event that the power sales agreements terminate, March Point Cogeneration Company abandons the project, or the project fails to return to normal operations
within a reasonable time after a complete or partial shutdown, during the term of the power sales agreements. In addition, a subsidiary of EME has guaranteed the obligations of Sycamore Cogeneration
Company under its project power sales agreement to repay capacity payments to the project's power purchaser in the event that the project unilaterally terminates its performance or reduces its
electric power producing capability during the term of the power sales agreement. The obligations under the indemnification agreements as of June 30, 2006, if payment were required, would be
$114 million. EME has not recorded a liability related to these indemnities.

Subsidiary Guarantee for Performance of Unconsolidated Affiliate

A
subsidiary of EME has guaranteed the obligations of an unconsolidated affiliate to make payments to a third party for power delivered under a fixed-price power sales agreement. This
agreement runs through 2007. EME believes there is sufficient cash flow to pay the power suppliers, assuming timely payment by the power purchasers. Due to the nature of this indemnity, a maximum
potential liability cannot be determined. To the extent EME's subsidiary would be required to make payments under the guarantee, EME's subsidiary and EME are indemnified by Peabody Energy Corporation
pursuant to the 2000 Purchase and Sale Agreement for Citizens Power LLC. EME's subsidiary has not recorded a liability related to this indemnity.

Contingencies

MISO Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee Charges

On April 25, 2006, the FERC issued an order regarding the MISO's "Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee" charges (RSG charges). The MISO's business practice
manuals and other instructions to market participants have stated, since the implementation of market operations on April 1, 2005, that RSG charges will not be imposed on offers to supply power
not supported by actual generation (also known as virtual supply offers). However, some market participants raised questions about the language of the MISO's tariff concerning that issue and, in
October 2005, the MISO submitted to the FERC proposed tariff revisions clarifying its tariff to reflect its business practices with respect to RSG charges and filed corrected tariff sheets
exempting virtual supply from RSG charges. In its April 25 decision, the FERC interpreted the MISO's tariff to require that virtual supply offers must be included in the calculation of the RSG
charges and that, to the extent that the MISO did not charge virtual supply offers for RSG charges, it violated the terms of its tariff. The FERC order then proceeded to require the MISO to
recalculate the RSG charges back to April 1, 2005, and to make refunds to customers, with interest, reflecting the recalculated charges. In order to make such refunds, it is likely that the
MISO will attempt to impose retroactively RSG charges on those who submitted virtual supply offers during the recalculation period. Edison Mission Marketing & Trading (EMMT) made virtual supply
offers in the MISO during this period on which no RSG charges were imposed, and thus may be subject to a claim for refunds from the MISO (which claim will be contested by EMMT). Because calculation of
any claimed liability for refunds depends on information not currently available to it, EMMT cannot reasonably estimate a range of loss related to this matter. In addition, the FERC's April 25
order has been challenged by the MISO and other parties, including EMMT, and as the FERC has issued an extension of time to comply with the requirements of the order until after the date of issuance
of an order on rehearing, the eventual outcome of these proceedings is unclear.

17

---



Tax Matters

EME is, and may in the future be, under examination by tax authorities in varying tax jurisdictions with respect to positions it takes in connection with the
filing of its tax returns. Matters raised upon audit may involve substantial amounts, which, if resolved unfavorably, an event not currently anticipated, could possibly be material. However, in EME's
opinion, it is unlikely that the resolution of any such matters will have a material adverse effect upon EME's financial condition or results of operations.

Litigation

EME experiences other routine litigation in the normal course of its business. None of such pending routine litigation is expected to have a material adverse
effect on EME's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Insurance

On January 29, 2006, the main power transformer on Unit 3 of the Homer City facilities failed, resulting in a suspension of operations at this unit. EME
Homer City secured a replacement transformer and Unit 3 returned to service on May 5, 2006. The main transformer failure will result in claims under EME Homer City's property and business
interruption insurance policies. At June 30, 2006, EME Homer City recorded a $17 million receivable, of which $11 million relates to business interruption insurance coverage and
has been reflected in other income (expense), net in EME's consolidated income statements.

Environmental Matters and Regulations

The construction and operation of power plants are subject to environmental regulation by federal, state and local authorities. EME believes that it is in
substantial compliance with environmental regulatory requirements and that maintaining compliance with current requirements will not materially affect its financial position or results of operation.
However, possible future developments, such as the promulgation of more stringent environmental laws and regulations, future proceedings that may be initiated by environmental authorities, and
settlements agreed to by other companies could affect the costs and the manner in which EME conducts its business, and may also cause it to make substantial additional capital expenditures. There is
no assurance that EME would be able to recover these increased costs from its customers or that EME's financial position and results of operations would not be materially adversely affected as a
result.

Typically,
environmental laws and regulations require a lengthy and complex process for obtaining licenses, permits and approvals prior to construction, operation or modification of a
project or generating facility. Meeting all the necessary requirements can delay or sometimes prevent the completion of a proposed project, as well as require extensive modifications to existing
projects, which may involve significant capital expenditures. Failure to comply with applicable environmental laws may subject a project's owner or operator to injunctive relief or penalties and fines
imposed by regulatory authorities.

With
respect to potential liabilities arising under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, commonly referred to as CERCLA, or similar laws for
the investigation and remediation of contaminated property, EME accrues a liability to the extent that the costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Midwest Generation has accrued
approximately $4 million at June 30, 2006 for estimated environmental investigation and remediation costs for the

18

---



Illinois
Plants. This estimate is based upon the number of sites, the scope of work and the estimated costs for environmental activity where such expenditures could be reasonably estimated. Future
estimated costs may vary based on changes in regulations or requirements of federal, state or local governmental agencies, changes in technology, and actual costs of disposal. In addition, future
remediation costs will be affected by the nature and extent of contamination discovered at the sites that requires remediation. Given the prior history of the operations at its facilities, EME cannot
be certain that the existence or extent of all contamination at its sites has been fully identified. However, based on available information, management believes that future costs in excess of the
amounts disclosed on all known and quantifiable environmental contingencies will not be material to EME's financial position. See "Note 16. Commitments and
ContingenciesEnvironmental Matters and Regulations" in EME's financial statements included in its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005
for a more complete discussion of EME's environmental contingencies.

Note 12. Supplemental Statements of Cash Flows Information

Six Months Ended
June 30,2006

2005(in millions)Cash paid (received)Interest (net of amount capitalized)

$
163

$
149Income taxes


168


2Cash payments under plant operating leases


199


154Details of assets acquiredFair value of assets acquired

$
29

$
Liabilities assumed








During the first six months of 2006, EME accrued $11 million in connection with the purchase price of the Wildorado wind project due upon
completion of construction. In addition, EME received a capital contribution of $76 million in the form of ownership interests in a portfolio of wind projects and a small biomass project.

Note 13. Stock Compensation Plans

Stock Options

Under various plans, EME may grant stock options at exercise prices equal to the average of high and low price at the grant date and other awards related to or
with a value derived from Edison International common stock to directors and certain employees. Options generally expire 10 years after the grant date and vest over a period of four years of
continuous service, with expense recognized evenly over the vesting period, except for awards granted to retirement-eligible participants, as discussed in
Note 1GeneralStock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options was $2 million and $4 million for the second
quarter of 2006 and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Under prior accounting rules, there was no comparable expense recognized for the same periods in 2005. See
Note 1GeneralStock-Based Compensation, for further discussion.

Beginning
with awards made in 2003, stock options accrue dividend equivalents for the first five years of the option term. Unless transferred to non-qualified deferral plan
accounts, dividend equivalents accumulate without interest. Dividend equivalents are paid only on options that vest, including options that are unexercised. Dividend equivalents are paid in cash after
the vesting date.

19

---



Edison
International has discretion to pay certain dividend equivalents in shares of Edison International common stock. Additionally, Edison International will substitute cash awards to the extent
necessary to pay tax withholding or any government levies.

The
fair value for each option granted was determined as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires various
assumptions noted in the following table.

|                                         |  | Three Months Ended
June 30, |  | Six Months Ended
June 30,
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|
|Expected terms (in years)                |  | 9 to 10                     |  | 9 to 10                  
|Risk-free interest rate                  |  | 4.3%-4.5%                   |  | 4.2%-4.3%                
|Expected dividend yield                  |  | 2.6%-2.8%                   |  | 2.5%-2.8%                
|Weighted-average expected dividend yield |  | 2.7%                        |  | 2.7%                     
|Expected volatility                      |  | 16.8%-17.5%                 |  | 18.7%-19.2%              
|Weighted-average volatility              |  | 17.2%                       |  | 18.9%                    

The expected term of options granted is based on the actual remaining contractual term of the options. The risk-free interest rate for
periods within the contractual life of the option is based on a 52-week historical average of the 10-year semi-annual coupon U.S. Treasury note. In 2006, expected
volatility is based on the historical volatility of Edison International's common stock for the recent 36 months. Prior to January 1, 2006, expected volatility was based on the median of
the most recent 36 months historical volatility of peer companies because Edison International's historical volatility was impacted by the California energy crisis.

A
summary of the status of Edison International's stock options granted to EME employees is as follows:

|                                             |  |           |   | Weighted Average |       | 
|-------------------------------------------- |  | --------- | - | ---------------- | ----- | 
|
|Outstanding at December 31, 2005             |  | 3,626,365 |   | $                | 22.06 | 
|Granted                                      |  | 407,848   |   |                  | 44.11 | 
|Transferred to affiliates                    |  | (298,647  | ) |                  | 21.83 | 
|Forfeited                                    |  | (27,949   | ) |                  | 28.35 | 
|Exercised                                    |  | (379,482  | ) |                  | 18.73 | 
|                                             |  |           |   |                  |       | 
|Outstanding at June 30, 2006                 |  | 3,328,135 |   | $                | 25.10 | 
|                                             |  |           |   |                  |       | 
|Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2006 |  | 3,195,872 |   | $                | 24.86 | 
|                                             |  |           |   |                  |       | 
|Exercisable at June 30, 2006                 |  | 1,690,208 |   | $                | 20.30 | 
|                                             |  |           |   |                  |       | 

The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $13.47 and $13.31, respectively.
The weighted-average fair value of options granted for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $14.42 and $11.72, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the
quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $3 million and $7 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005 was $11 million and $10 million, respectively. At June 30, 2006, there was $12 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options net of expected
forfeitures. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2 years. The fair value of

20

---



options
vested during the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, was $1 million and $2 million, respectively.

Cash
received from options exercised for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $3 million and $6 million, respectively, and for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $8 million and $9 million, respectively. The estimated tax benefit from options exercised was $4 million for both the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005.

Performance Shares

A target number of contingent performance shares were awarded to executives in January 2004, January 2005 and March 2006, and vest at the end
of December 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Dividend equivalents associated with these performance shares accumulate without interest and will be payable in cash following the end of the
performance period when the performance shares are paid, although Edison International has discretion to pay certain dividend equivalents in Edison International common stock. The vesting of Edison
International's performance shares is dependent upon a market condition and three years of continuous service subject to a prorated adjustment for employees who are terminated under certain
circumstances or retire, but payment cannot be accelerated. The market condition is based on Edison International's common stock performance relative to the performance of a specified group of
companies at the end of a three-calendar-year period. The number of performance shares earned is determined based on Edison International's ranking among these companies. Dividend
equivalents will be adjusted to correlate to the actual number of performance shares paid. Performance shares earned are settled half in cash and half in common stock; however, Edison International
has discretion under certain of the awards to pay the half subject to cash settlement in common stock. Additionally, cash awards are substituted to the extent necessary to pay tax withholding or any
government levies. The portion of performance shares settled in cash is classified as a share-based liability award. The fair value of these shares is remeasured at each reporting period and the
related compensation expense is adjusted. The portion of performance shares payable in common stock is classified as a share-based equity award. Compensation expense related to these shares is based
on the grant-date fair value. Performance shares expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period based on the fair values determined, except for awards granted to retirement-eligible
participants, as discussed in "Stock-Based Compensation" in Note 1GeneralStock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation expense associated with performance shares
was $0.1 million and $5.0 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $0.5 million and $9.0 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

The
performance shares' fair value is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model. The Monte Carlo simulation valuation model requires a risk-free interest rate
and an expected volatility rate assumption. The risk-free interest rate is based on a 52-week historical average of the three-year U.S. Treasury note and is used as
proxy for the expected return for the specified group of companies. Volatility is based on the historical volatility of Edison International's common stock for the recent 36 months. Historical
volatility for each company in the specified group is obtained from a financial data services provider.

Edison
International's risk-free interest rate and expected volatility used to determine the grant date fair values for the 2006 and 2005 performance shares classified as
share-based equity awards was 4.1% and 16.2%, respectively, and 2.7% and 27.7%, respectively. The portion of performance shares classified as share-based liability awards are revalued at each
reporting period. The risk-free interest rate and expected volatility rate used to determine the fair value as of June 30, 2006 was 4.5% and 17.2%, respectively.

21

---



The
total intrinsic value of performance shares settled during each of the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was zero. The total intrinsic value of performance shares settled
during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $19 million and $8 million, respectively, which included cash paid to settle the performance shares classified as liability
awards of $8 million and $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. At June 30, 2006, there was $2 million (based on the
June 30, 2006 fair value of performance shares classified as liability awards) of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance shares. That cost is expected to be recognized over
a weighted-average period of less than two years. The fair values of performance shares vested during the quarters and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, was zero.

A
summary of the status of Edison International nonvested performance shares granted to EME employees and classified as equity awards is as follows:

Performance
Shares

Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair ValueNonvested at December 31, 2005

67,530

$
38.63Granted

16,377


52.55Forfeited

(1,266
)

39.36Nonvested at June 30, 2006

82,641

$
41.38


The weighted-average grant-date fair value of performance shares classified as equity awards granted during the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 was $46.09.

A
summary of the status of Edison International nonvested performance shares granted to EME employees and classified as liability awards (the current portion is reflected in the caption
"Accrued liabilities" and the long-term portion is reflected in "Other long-term liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets) is as follows:

Performance
Shares

Weighted-Average
Fair ValueNonvested at December 31, 2005

67,547Granted

16,396Forfeited

(1,267
)Nonvested at June 30, 2006

82,676

$
80.84


Note 14. New Accounting Pronouncements

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs." SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs and spoilage be recognized as current-period charges. Further, SFAS No. 151 requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities. Unallocated overheads must be recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred
beginning in the first quarter of 2006. The adoption of this standard had no impact on EME's consolidated financial statements.

22

---



Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R)

A new accounting standard requires companies to use the fair value accounting method for stock-based compensation. EME implemented the new standard in the first
quarter of 2006 and applied the modified prospective transition method. Under the modified prospective method, the new accounting standard was applied effective January 1, 2006 to the unvested
portion of awards previously granted and will be applied to all prospective awards. Prior financial statements were not restated under this method. The new accounting standard resulted in the
recognition of expense for all stock-based compensation awards. Prior to January 1, 2006, EME used the intrinsic value method of accounting, which resulted in no recognition of expense for
Edison International stock options.

Prior
to adoption of the new accounting standard, EME presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as a component of operating cash flows under
the caption "Other operatingliabilities" in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The new accounting standard requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits that occur from
estimated tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows. The $4 million excess tax benefit is
classified as a financing cash inflow in 2006.

Due
to the adoption of this new accounting standard, EME recorded a cumulative effect adjustment that increased net income by approximately $0.4 million, net of tax, in the first
quarter of 2006, mainly to reflect the change in the valuation method for performance shares classified as liability awards and the use of forfeiture estimates.

FASB Staff Position FIN 46(R)-6

In April 2006, the FASB issued Staff Position FIN 46(R)-6, "Determining Variability to be Considered in Applying FIN 46(R)." FIN
46(R)-6 states that the variability to be considered in applying FIN 46(R) shall be based on an analysis of the design of the entity following a two-step process. The first
step is to analyze the nature of the risks in the entity. The second step would be to determine the purpose(s) for which the entity was created and determine the variability (created by the risks
identified in Step 1) the entity is designed to create and pass along to its interest holders. The guidance in this FASB Staff Position is effective prospectively beginning July 1, 2006,
although companies have until December 31, 2006 to elect retrospective applications. EME has not yet selected a transition method.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 48

In July 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes," that
clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions. An enterprise would be required to recognize, in its financial statements, the best estimate of the impact of a tax position by determining if the
weight of the available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, based solely on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained on audit. The effective date applicable to EME is
January 1, 2007. EME is currently assessing the potential impact of the interpretation on its financial condition.

23

---



ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) contains "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements reflect EME's current expectations and projections about future events based on EME's knowledge of present
facts and circumstances and assumptions about future events and include any statement that does not directly relate to a historical or current fact. Other information distributed by EME that is
incorporated in this report, or that refers to or incorporates this report, may also contain forward-looking statements. In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the words "expects,"
"believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "projects," "intends," "plans," "probable," "may," "will," "could," "would," "should," and variations of such words and similar expressions, or discussions of
strategy or plans, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements necessarily involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause results to differ, or that otherwise could impact EME, include but are not limited
to:



24

---





Additional information about risks and uncertainties, including more detail about the factors described above, is contained throughout this MD&A and in the "Risk
Factors" section included in Part I, Item 1A of EME's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Readers are urged to read this entire quarterly
report on Form 10-Q and carefully consider the risks, uncertainties and other factors that affect EME's business. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made,
and EME is not obligated to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements. Readers should review future reports filed by EME with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This MD&A discusses material changes in the results of operations, financial condition and other developments of EME since December 31, 2005, and as
compared to the second quarter of 2005 and six months ended June 30, 2005. This discussion presumes that the reader has read or has access to the MD&A included in Item 7 of EME's annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

This
MD&A is presented in four sections:

PageManagement's Overview; Critical Accounting Estimates

25Results of Operations

28Liquidity and Capital Resources

37Market Risk Exposures

44


MANAGEMENT'S OVERVIEW; CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Management's Overview

Results of Operations

Net income (loss) is comprised of the following components:

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2006

2005

2006

2005(in millions)Income (loss) from continuing operations


(43
)

19


32


76Income from discontinued operations


4


21


77


28Net Income (Loss)

$
(39
)
$
40

$
109

$
104


EME's decrease in income from continuing operations in the second quarter of 2006 was primarily attributable to an $88 million, after tax,
loss on early extinguishment of debt recorded during the second quarter of 2006. Partially offsetting this decrease were higher earnings at the Illinois Plants and the Homer City facilities, driven by
higher wholesale energy prices. The year-to-date decrease in income from continuing operations was primarily due to loss on early extinguishment of debt and lower earnings at
the Homer City facilities due to a transformer failure related to Unit 3. Partially offsetting these decreases were higher earnings at the Illinois Plants and higher energy trading income from Edison
Mission Marketing & Trading (EMMT).

EME's
income from discontinued operations during the second quarters of 2006 and 2005 and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was primarily related to distributions authorized
by the liquidators of the Lakeland power project. Together with $16 million received in April 2006, EME has

25

---



received
a total of $122 million of distributions in 2006 from the settlement of a 2001 claim for termination of a power contract by a subsidiary of TXU Europe Group plc. The activities of the
Lakeland liquidator are near completion and substantially all the distributions from the Lakeland project have been made.

Business Development

Wind Projects

EME has undertaken a number of activities with respect to new wind projects, including:



In
addition, EME received, as a capital contribution, ownership interests in a 192 MW portfolio of wind projects (EME's share is 176 MW) located in Iowa and Minnesota. These projects
were previously owned by EME's affiliate, Edison Capital. EME accounted for this acquisition at Edison Capital's historical cost as a transaction between entities under common control for a net book
value of approximately $76 million.

Thermal Projects

EME has continued to develop two 500 MW natural gas-fired peaker projects in Southern California. Southern California Edison Company has announced a
request for offers from new generation resources. EME intends to respond to the request for offers.

In
June 2006, subsidiaries of EME and BP America Inc. formed Carson Hydrogen Power LLC for the development of a power project to be located in Carson, California. Carson Hydrogen
is conducting engineering studies for this industrial gasification project that will integrate proven gasification, power generation and enhanced oil recovery technologies. In June 2006, the
project submitted an application to the United States Department of Energy (DOE) to qualify for gasification tax credits under the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Funding of tax credits is limited and,
accordingly, there is no assurance that the project will be allocated tax credits. A decision is not expected until the end of 2006.

Financing Activities

On June 6, 2006, EME completed a private offering of $500 million of its 7.50% senior notes due 2013 and $500 million of its 7.75% senior
notes due 2016. The proceeds of the offering were used, together with cash on hand, to purchase substantially all of EME's outstanding 10% senior notes due 2008 and 9.875% senior notes due 2011. In
connection with the repayment, EME recorded a $143 million loss on early extinguishment of debt in the second quarter of 2006.

26

---



On
June 15, 2006, EME entered into a new credit agreement providing for $500 million in revolving loan and letter of credit capacity to be used to repay existing debt
and/or to provide liquidity and credit support for the hedging and trading activities of EME and its subsidiaries. The new credit agreement replaces EME's $98 million credit agreement.

ERP Initiative

EME has commenced a new initiative as part of an Edison International enterprise-wide project to implement an integrated resource planning (ERP)
application from SAP during the next two years. The implementation of this application will replace EME's existing financial, human resources, materials management, and fuel management information
systems with SAP's integrated ERP application. The objective of this initiative is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of EME's operational systems and enhance the transparency of information
throughout the company.

Critical Accounting Estimates

For a discussion of EME's critical accounting estimates, refer to "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsCritical Accounting Estimates" of EME's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

27

---



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Introduction

This section discusses operating results for the second quarters of 2006 and 2005 and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and is organized under the
following headings:

PageResults of Continuing Operations

28Results of Discontinued Operations

36New Accounting Pronouncements

36


Results of Continuing Operations

Overview

EME operates in one line of business, independent power production. Operating revenues are primarily derived from the sale of power generated from the Illinois
Plants and the Homer City facilities. Intercompany interest expense and income between EME and its consolidated subsidiaries have been eliminated in the following project results, except as described
below with respect to loans provided to EME from a wholly owned subsidiary, Midwest Generation. Equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates relates to energy projects accounted for under the
equity method. EME recognizes its proportional share of the income or loss of such entities.

EME uses the words "earnings" or "losses" in this section to describe income or loss from continuing operations before income taxes.

28

---



The
following section provides a summary of the operating results for the second quarters of 2006 and 2005 and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 together with discussions of
the contributions by specific projects and of other significant factors affecting these results.

|                             |                                      | Three Months Ended
June 30, |     | Six Months Ended
June 30, |  
|---------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | --------------------------- | --- | ------------------------- | -
|
|
|Project Earnings (Losses)(1) |                                      |                             |     |                           |  
|                             | Consolidated operations              |                             |     |                           |  
|                             | Illinois Plants                      |                             | $   | 25                        |  
|                             | Homer City                           |                             |     | 35                        |  
|                             | Energy Trading(2)                    |                             |     | 26                        |  
|                             | San Juan Mesa                        |                             |     | 1                         |  
|                             | Storm Lake                           |                             |     | 3                         |  
|                             | Other                                |                             |     | (1                        | )
|                             | Unconsolidated affiliates            |                             |     |                           |  
|                             | Big 4 projects                       |                             |     | 32                        |  
|                             | Sunrise                              |                             |     | 5                         |  
|                             | March Point                          |                             |     |                          |  
|                             | Doga                                 |                             |     | 5                         |  
|                             | Other                                |                             |     | 2                         |  
|                             |                                      |                             |     |                           |  
|                             |                                      |                             | 133 |                           |  
|                             | Corporate interest income            |                             |     | 20                        |  
|                             | Corporate interest expense           |                             |     | (64                       | )
|                             | Corporate administrative and general |                             |     | (25                       | )
|                             | Gain on sale of assets               |                             |     |                          |  
|                             | Loss on early extinguishment of debt |                             |     | (143                      | )
|                             | Other income (expense), net          |                             |     |                          |  
|                             |                                      |                             |     |                           |  
|                             |                                      | $                           | (79 | )                         | $
|                             |                                      |                             |     |                           |  

---

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 302006

2005

2006

2005(in millions)Project earnings (losses)

$
(79
)
$
9

$
42

$
99Less: Production tax credits


(4
)

(3
)

(9
)

(4
)Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

$
(83
)
$
6

$
33

$
95


29

---



Earnings from Consolidated Operations

Illinois Plants

|                       |                                             | Three Months Ended
June 30, |    | Six Months Ended
June 30, |      
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | -- | ------------------------- | -----
|
|
|Operating Revenues     |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|                       | Energy revenues                             |                             | $  | 261                       |      
|                       | Capacity revenues                           |                             |    | 7                         |      
|                       | Other revenues                              |                             |    | 2                         |      
|                       | Net losses from price risk management       |                             |    | (4                        | )    
|                       |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|                       | Total operating revenues                    |                             |    | 266                       |      
|                       |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|Operating Expenses     |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|                       | Fuel                                        |                             |    | 72                        |      
|                       | Gain on sale of emission allowances(1)      |                             |    |                          |      
|                       | Plant operations                            |                             |    | 115                       |      
|                       | Plant operating leases                      |                             |    | 18                        |      
|                       | Depreciation and amortization               |                             |    | 25                        |      
|                       | Asset impairment charges                    |                             |    |                          |      
|                       | Administrative and general                  |                             |    | 7                         |      
|                       |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|                       | Total operating expenses                    |                             |    | 237                       |      
|                       |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|Operating Income       |                                             |                             | 29 |                           |      
|                       |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|Other Income (Expense) |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|                       | Interest income on note receivable from EME |                             |    | 28                        |      
|                       | Interest expense and other                  |                             |    | (32                       | )    
|                       |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|                       | Total other income (expense)                |                             |    | (4                        | )    
|                       |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|Income Before Taxes    |                                             | $                           | 25 |                           | $    
|                       |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|Statistics             |                                             |                             |    |                           |      
|                       | Coal-Fired Generation(2)                    |                             |    |                           |      
|                       |                                             | Generation (in GWh)         |    |                           | 5,493
|                       |                                             | Equivalent availability(3)  |    |                           | 66.0%
|                       |                                             | Capacity factor(4)          |    |                           | 44.8%
|                       |                                             | Load factor(5)              |    |                           | 67.9%
|                       |                                             | Forced outage rate(6)       |    |                           | 7.7% 
|                       | Average energy price/MWh                    |                             | $  | 47.63                     |      
|                       | Average fuel costs/MWh                      |                             | $  | 13.42                     |      

---

30

---



Earnings from the Illinois Plants were $25 million and $152 million during the second quarter of 2006 and six months ended June 30,
2006, respectively, compared to $18 million and $110 million for the
comparable periods in the prior year. The increase in the second quarter earnings of $7 million was primarily due to higher energy margin (energy revenues less fuel expenses) and an asset
impairment charge recorded during the second quarter of 2005 primarily associated with a redefined capital program related to coal dust mitigation partially offset by higher planned maintenance costs.
Although generation in the second quarter of 2006 was lower than the second quarter of 2005, energy margin increased primarily due to a 14% increase in average energy prices.

Earnings
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased $42 million primarily due to higher energy margin driven by higher average energy prices, recognition of income in 2006
from the sale of emission allowances to the Homer City facilities, and the 2005 asset impairment charge described above.

Losses
from price risk management activities are due to price changes on power contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. At June 30, 2006, cumulative
unrealized losses of $12 million (pre-tax) have been recognized on hedge contracts that pertain to the remainder of 2006, 2007 and 2008. See "Market Risk ExposuresCommodity Price
Risk" for more information regarding forward market prices.

The
earnings of the Illinois Plants included interest income of $28 million and $29 million for the second quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $56 million
and $57 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to loans to EME. In August 2000, Midwest Generation, which owns or leases the Illinois Plants,
entered into a sale-leaseback transaction of the Powerton-Joliet facilities. The proceeds from the sale of these facilities were loaned to EME, which also provided a guarantee of the related lease
obligations of Midwest Generation. The Powerton-Joliet sale-leaseback is recorded as an operating lease for accounting purposes.

31

---



Homer City

|                       |                                               | Three Months Ended
June 30, |    | Six Months Ended
June 30, |  
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | -- | ------------------------- | -
|
|
|Operating Revenues     |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|                       | Energy revenues                               |                             | $  | 143                       |  
|                       | Capacity revenues                             |                             |    | 4                         |  
|                       | Other revenues                                |                             |    | 3                         |  
|                       | Net gains (losses) from price risk management |                             |    | 1                         |  
|                       |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|                       | Total operating revenues                      |                             |    | 151                       |  
|                       |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|Operating Expenses     |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|                       | Fuel(1)                                       |                             |    | 68                        |  
|                       | Gain on sale of emission allowances(2)        |                             |    |                          |  
|                       | Plant operations                              |                             |    | 28                        |  
|                       | Plant operating leases                        |                             |    | 26                        |  
|                       | Depreciation and amortization                 |                             |    | 4                         |  
|                       | Administrative and general                    |                             |    | 1                         |  
|                       |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|                       | Total operating expenses                      |                             |    | 127                       |  
|                       |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|Operating Income       |                                               |                             | 24 |                           |  
|                       |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|Other Income (Expense) |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|                       | Interest and other income                     |                             |    | 12                        |  
|                       | Interest expense                              |                             |    | (1                        | )
|                       |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|                       | Total other income (expense)                  |                             |    | 11                        |  
|                       |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|Income Before Taxes    |                                               | $                           | 35 |                           | $
|                       |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|Statistics             |                                               |                             |    |                           |  
|                       | Generation (in GWh)                           |                             |    | 2,866                     |  
|                       | Equivalent availability(3)                    |                             |    | 74.3%                     |  
|                       | Capacity factor(4)                            |                             |    | 69.5%                     |  
|                       | Load factor(5)                                |                             |    | 93.6%                     |  
|                       | Forced outage rate(6)                         |                             |    | 19.9%                     |  
|                       | Average energy price/MWh                      |                             | $  | 50.02                     |  
|                       | Average fuel costs/MWh                        |                             | $  | 24.13                     |  

---

32

---



Earnings from Homer City increased $27 million and decreased $17 million for the second quarter of 2006 and six months ended
June 30, 2006, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2005. The second quarter increase is primarily attributable to higher energy margin, lower planned maintenance costs and
estimated insurance recovery related to the Unit 3 outage. Although generation in the second quarter of 2006 was lower than the second quarter of 2005, due to the unplanned outage at
Unit 3, there was a 17% increase in average energy prices. The 2006 year-to-date decrease is primarily attributable to lower energy margin and higher plant
operating costs in 2006 due to an unplanned outage at Unit 3, partially offset by estimated insurance recovery. Homer City is generally classified as a baseload plant, which means the amount of
generation is largely based on the availability of the plant. Accordingly, the Unit 3 outage reduced the amount of generation during the first six months of 2006.

Homer
City Unit 3 Outage

On
January 29, 2006, the main power transformer on Unit 3 of the Homer City facilities failed resulting in a suspension of operations at this unit. Homer City secured a
replacement transformer and Unit 3 returned to service on May 5, 2006. Homer City has adjusted its previously planned outage schedules for Unit 3 and the other Homer City units in
order to minimize to the extent practicable overall outage activities for all units through the first half of 2007. Taking into consideration the impact of the outage, generation for the year is
currently expected to be approximately 13 TWh. The actual financial impact and generation levels in 2006 will depend on the effect of market conditions upon the dispatch of the plant and on
prevailing power prices during the balance of the year.

The
main transformer failure will result in claims under Homer City's property and business interruption insurance policies. At June 30, 2006, Homer City recorded a
$17 million receivable related to these claims. Resolution of the claims is subject to a number of uncertainties, including computations of the lost profit during the outage period.

Price
Risk Management

Homer
City recorded gains (losses) of approximately $(5) million and $1 million during the second quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $(16) million and
$(3) million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing the amount of cash flow hedges' ineffectiveness. Losses related to the ineffective portion of
hedge contracts were primarily due to changes in the difference between energy prices at PJM West Hub (the settlement point under forward contracts) and the energy prices at the Homer City busbar (the
delivery point where power generated by the Homer City facilities is delivered into the transmission system). Also included in net gains (losses) from price risk management activities are economic
hedges that did not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 of $6 million and $(3) million in the second quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $3 million and
$(1) million during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. At June 30, 2006, cumulative unrealized losses of $42 million (pre-tax) have been recognized
on hedge contracts that pertain to the remainder of 2006, 2007 and 2008. See "Market Risk ExposuresCommodity Price Risk" for more information regarding forward market prices.

Energy Trading

EME seeks to generate profit by utilizing the commercial platform of its subsidiary, EMMT, to engage in trading activities in those markets in which it is active
as a result of its management of the merchant power plants of Midwest Generation and Homer City. EMMT trades power, fuel and transmission primarily in the eastern power grid using products available
over the counter, through exchanges and from independent system operators. Earnings from energy trading activities increased $7 million and $14 million for the second quarter of 2006 and
six months ended June 30, 2006,

33

---



respectively,
compared to the corresponding periods of 2005. The increase in earnings from energy trading activities was primarily due to increased congestion at specific delivery points in the
eastern power grid in which EMMT purchased financial transmission rights. See "Market Risk ExposuresRegulatory MattersMISO Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee Charges" for
information regarding potential refund exposure related to virtual supply offers made by EMMT in MISO after April 1, 2005.

San Juan Mesa

EME's earnings from the San Juan Mesa wind project were $1 million and $5 million for the second quarter of 2006 and six months ended
June 30, 2006, with no earnings recorded in 2005 due to the acquisition of the San Juan Mesa wind project on December 27, 2005.

During
the first quarter of 2006, EME completed the sale of 25% of its ownership interest in the San Juan Mesa wind project to Citi Renewable Investments I LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary
of Citicorp North America, Inc. Proceeds from the sale were $43 million. EME recorded a pre-tax gain on the sale of approximately $4 million during the first quarter
of 2006.

Earnings from Unconsolidated Affiliates

Big 4 Projects

Earnings from the Big 4 projects decreased $8 million and $6 million for the second quarter of 2006 and six months ended June 30, 2006,
respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2005. The decreases in earnings were primarily due to lower earnings from the Kern River project during the first six months of 2006, compared to
the first six months of 2005, resulting from the expiration of the project's long-term power purchase and steam supply agreements in August 2005. Effective June 1, 2006, the
project commenced selling electricity under a five-year bilateral agreement with Southern California Edison Company. The decrease in year-to-date earnings was partially offset by generally
higher steam and energy prices in 2006 over 2005.

The
earnings from the Big 4 projects included interest expense from Edison Mission Energy Funding of $1 million and $2 million for the second quarters of 2006 and 2005,
respectively, and $3 million and $5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

March Point

EME's share of earnings from its ownership interest in March Point was $(4) million for the second quarter of 2005 and $4 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2005, respectively, resulting, in part, from mark-to-market gains (losses) related to gas purchase contracts. During the third quarter of 2005, EME
recorded an impairment charge related to its March Point investment which resulted in suspension of equity accounting. Accordingly, no earnings were recorded during the first six months of 2006.

Doga

Earnings from the Doga project increased $4 million in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the second quarter of 2005 and were about the same for the
respective six-month periods. The second quarter increase in earnings was primarily due to higher energy margin, lower maintenance expenses and lower taxes.

In
June 2006, the corporate tax rate in Turkey was reduced from 30% to 20%. Although this will reduce future income tax payments, Doga will report a loss from a reduction in
deferred tax assets

34

---



(related
to levelization of income under the power purchase agreement for financial reporting purposes). EME records its share of earnings from Doga on a lag, which means that the impact of the
reduction in deferred tax assets will be recorded in the third quarter of 2006. EME's share of the loss related to reduction in deferred tax assets is estimated to be approximately $11 million.

Seasonal Disclosure

EME's third quarter equity in income from its energy projects is materially higher than equity in income related to other quarters of the year due to warmer
weather during the summer months and because a number of EME's energy projects located on the West Coast have power sales contracts that provide for higher payments during the summer months.

Corporate Interest Income

EME corporate interest income increased $7 million and $13 million for the second quarter of 2006 and six months ended June 30, 2006,
respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to higher interest rates in 2006 compared to 2005.

Corporate Interest Expense

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2006

2005

2006

2005(in millions)Interest expense to third parties

$
36

$
39

$
74

$
79Interest expense to Midwest Generation


28


29


56


57Total corporate interest expense

$
64

$
68

$
130

$
136


Corporate Administrative and General Expenses

Administrative and general expenses decreased $10 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding period of 2005. The
decrease was primarily due to $10 million of costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2005 for severance and related costs in connection with EME restructuring activities.

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt

Loss on early extinguishment of debt was $143 million for the second quarter of 2006 and six months ended June 30, 2006 related to the early
repayment of EME's 10% senior notes due August 15, 2008 and 9.875% senior notes due April 15, 2011.

Loss
on early extinguishment of debt was $4 million in the first six months of 2005 consisting of a $4 million loss related to the early repayment of junior subordinated
debentures recorded during the first quarter of 2005.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Other income (expense), net increased $16 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding period of 2005. The 2006
increase was partially attributable to an $8 million gain related to receipt of shares from Mirant Corporation from settlement of a claim recorded during the first quarter of 2006.

35

---



Income Taxes

EME's income tax provision from continuing operations was $1 million and $19 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Income tax benefits are recognized pursuant to a tax-allocation agreement with Edison International. See "Liquidity and Capital ResourcesEME's Liquidity as a
Holding CompanyIntercompany Tax-Allocation Agreement." During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, EME recognized $9 million and $4 million,
respectively, of production tax credits related to wind projects and $3 million and $5 million, respectively, related to estimated state income tax benefits allocated from EIX. During
the second quarter of 2005, EME resolved a dispute regarding additional taxes asserted by the Internal Revenue Service during the audit of the 1994-1996 tax returns. As a result of the
resolution of this item, EME reversed $11.5 million of accrued taxes, recording this amount instead as a reduction of income taxes during the second quarter of 2005.

Results of Discontinued Operations

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $4 million and $21 million for the second quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and
$77 million and $28 million during the first six months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The 2006 increase is largely attributable to distributions received from the Lakeland project,
discussed below. During the first six months of 2005, EME completed the following sales:



The
aggregate after-tax gain on the sale of the aforementioned projects was $5 million.

Lakeland Project

EME previously owned a 220 MW power plant located in the United Kingdom, referred to as the Lakeland project. An administrative receiver was appointed in 2002 as
a result of default by its counterparty, a subsidiary of TXU Europe Group plc and the project company was subsequently placed in liquidation. In response to its claim against the TXU subsidiary for
damages resulting from the termination of the power sales agreement, the Lakeland project received a settlement of £116 million (approximately $217 million). EME is entitled
to receive the amount of the settlement remaining after payment of creditor claims. As creditor claims have been settled, EME has received to date payments of £13 million
(approximately $24 million) in April 2005, £61 million (approximately $106 million) in the first quarter of 2006, and £9 million
(approximately $16 million) in April 2006. The after-tax income attributable to the Lakeland project was $10 million and $24 million for the second quarters of
2006 and 2005, respectively, and $83 million and $24 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Beginning in 2002, EME reported the Lakeland project
among discontinued operations and accounts for its ownership of Lakeland Power on the cost method, with earnings being recognized as cash is distributed from the project.

New Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting EME, see "Edison Mission Energy and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial
StatementsNote 14. New Accounting Pronouncements."

36

---



LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Introduction

The following discussion of liquidity and capital resources is organized in the following sections:

PageEME's Liquidity

37EME Financing Developments

37Capital Expenditures

38EME's Historical Consolidated Cash Flow

38Credit Ratings

39Margin, Collateral Deposits and Other Credit Support for Energy Contracts

40EME's Liquidity as a Holding Company

40Dividend Restrictions in Major Financings

42Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

42Environmental Matters and Regulations

42


For a complete discussion of these issues, read this quarterly report on Form 10-Q in conjunction with EME's annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

EME's Liquidity

At June 30, 2006, EME and its subsidiaries had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $1.6 billion and EME had
available the full amount of borrowing capacity under its new $500 million corporate credit facility. EME's consolidated debt at June 30, 2006 was $3.4 billion. In addition, EME's
subsidiaries had $4.4 billion of long-term lease obligations related to the sale-leaseback transactions that are due over periods ranging up to 29 years.

EME Financing Developments

During June 2006, EME replaced its $98 million credit agreement with a new credit agreement that provides for a $500 million senior secured
revolving loan and letter of credit facility and matures on June 15, 2012 and completed a private offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.50% senior notes due
June 15, 2013 and $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.75% senior notes due June 15, 2016. EME will pay interest on the senior notes on June 15 and
December 15 of each year, beginning on December 15, 2006. The senior notes are redeemable by EME at any time at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of, plus accrued and unpaid
interest and liquidated damages, if any, on, the senior notes plus a "make-whole" premium.

As
security for its obligations under this credit facility, EME pledged its ownership interests in the holding companies through which it owns its interests in the Illinois Plants, the
Homer City facilities, the Westside projects and the Sunrise project. EME also granted a security interest in an account into which all distributions received by it from the Big 4 projects will be
deposited. EME will be free to use these proceeds unless an event of default occurs under the credit facility.

EME
used the net proceeds of the offering of the senior notes, together with cash on hand, to purchase $369 million in aggregate principal amount of its 10% senior notes due
August 15, 2008 and $596 million in aggregate principal amount of its 9.875% senior notes due April 15, 2011, that were validly tendered pursuant to EME's previously announced
cash tender offer and consent solicitation. The net proceeds of the offering of the senior notes, together with cash on hand, were also used to pay

37

---



related
tender premiums, consent fees and accrued interest. EME recorded a $143 million loss on early extinguishment of debt during the second quarter of 2006.

Capital Expenditures

The estimated capital and construction expenditures of EME's subsidiaries are $280 million in the remaining two quarters of 2006 and $493 million,
$28 million and $25 million for 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The non-environmental portion of these expenditures relates to the construction of the Wildorado wind
project, purchases of turbines, upgrades to dust collection/mitigation systems and the coal handling system, ash removal improvements and various other projects. EME plans to finance these
expenditures with existing subsidiary credit agreements, cash on hand or cash generated from operations. Included in the estimated expenditures are environmental expenditures of $4 million for
the remaining two quarters of 2006, $12 million for 2007, $6 million for 2008, and $25 million for 2009. The environmental expenditures relate to environmental projects such as
selective catalytic reduction system improvements at the Homer City facilities and projects at the Illinois Plants.

EME's Historical Consolidated Cash Flow

Consolidated Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations increased $465 million in the first six months of 2006, compared to the first six months
of 2005. The 2006 increase was primarily attributable to a decrease of $363 million in required margin and collateral deposits in 2006 for EME's price risk management and trading activities,
compared to an increase of $33 million in 2005. This change resulted from a decrease in forward market prices at June 30, 2006 as compared to December 31, 2005.

Cash
provided by operating activities from discontinued operations increased $64 million in the first six months of 2006, compared to the first six months of 2005. The 2006
increase reflects higher distributions received in 2006 compared to 2005 from the Lakeland power project. See "Results of OperationsResults of Discontinued OperationsLakeland
Project" for more information regarding these distributions.

Consolidated Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities from continuing operations decreased $737 million in the first six months of 2006, compared to the first six months of
2005. The 2006 decrease was primarily attributable to net proceeds of $1 billion received from EME's issuance of senior notes in June 2006, which were mostly used to repay
$965 million of EME's outstanding senior notes and $136 million paid for tender premiums and related fees.

In
addition, Midwest Generation also had borrowings of $315 million under its credit facility, mostly offset by repayments of $285 million in 2006. In addition, dividend
payments were made to MEHC of $360 million in 2005 compared to a $12 million dividend payment to MEHC in 2006. In 2005, EME repaid its junior subordinated debentures for
$150 million and Midwest Generation repaid $302 million related to its existing term loan.

Consolidated Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations increased $403 million in the first six months of 2006, compared to the first six months of
2005. The 2006 increase was primarily due to net

38

---



purchases
of marketable securities of $76 million in the first six months of 2006, compared to net sales of marketable securities of $140 million in the first six months of 2005. In
addition, EME paid $18 million towards the purchase price of the Wildorado wind project during the first quarter of 2006, incurred higher capital expenditures in 2006 and received lower
proceeds from sales of projects. In 2005, EME received proceeds of $124 million from the sale of its 25% investment in the Tri Energy project and its 50% investment in the CBK project compared
to proceeds of $43 million in 2006 from the sale of 25% of its ownership interest in the San Juan Mesa wind project.

Credit Ratings

Overview

Credit ratings for EME and its subsidiaries, Midwest Generation and EMMT, are as follows:

Moody's Rating

S&P RatingEME

B1

B+Midwest Generation:First priority senior secured rating

Ba2

BB-Second priority senior secured rating

Ba3

BEMMT

Not Rated

B+


EME cannot provide assurance that its current credit ratings or the credit ratings of its subsidiaries will remain in effect for any given period
of time or that one or more of these ratings will not be lowered. EME notes that these credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold its securities and may be revised at any time by a
rating agency.

EME
does not have any "rating triggers" contained in subsidiary financings that would result in it or EME being required to make equity contributions or provide additional financial
support to its subsidiaries.

Credit Rating of EMMT

The Homer City sale-leaseback documents restrict EME Homer City's ability to enter into trading activities, as defined in the documents, with EMMT to
sell forward the output of the Homer City facilities if EMMT does not have an investment grade credit rating from Standard & Poor's or Moody's or, in the absence of those ratings, if it is not
rated as investment grade pursuant to EME's internal credit scoring procedures. These documents include a requirement that the counterparty to such transactions, and EME Homer City, if acting as
seller to an unaffiliated third party, be investment grade. EME currently sells all the output from the Homer City facilities through EMMT, which has a below investment grade credit rating, and EME
Homer City is not rated. Therefore, in order for EME to continue to sell forward the output of the Homer City facilities, either: (1) EME must obtain consent from the sale-leaseback
owner participant to permit EME Homer City to sell directly into the market or through EMMT; or (2) EMMT must provide assurances of performance consistent with the requirements of the
sale-leaseback documents. EME has obtained a consent from the sale-leaseback owner participant that will allow EME Homer City to enter into such sales, under specified
conditions, through December 31, 2006. EME Homer City continues to be in compliance with the terms of the consent; however, the consent is revocable by the sale-leaseback owner
participant at any time. The sale-leaseback owner participant has not indicated that it intends to revoke the consent; however, there can be no assurance that it will not do so in the
future. Revocation of the consent would not affect trades between EMMT and EME Homer City that had been entered into while the consent was still in effect. EME is permitted to sell the output of the
Homer City facilities into the spot market at any

39

---



time.
See "Market Risk ExposuresCommodity Price RiskEnergy Price Risk Affecting Sales from the Homer City Facilities."

Margin, Collateral Deposits and Other Credit Support for Energy Contracts

In connection with entering into contracts in support of EME's price risk management and energy trading activities (including forward contracts, transmission
contracts and futures contracts), EME's subsidiary, EMMT, has entered into agreements to mitigate the risk of nonperformance. Because the credit ratings of EMMT and EME are below investment grade, EME
has historically provided collateral in the form of cash and letters of credit for the benefit of counterparties related to accounts payable and unrealized losses in connection with these price risk
management and trading activities. At June 30, 2006, EMMT had deposited $289 million in cash with brokers in margin accounts in support of futures contracts and had deposited
$46 million with counterparties in support of forward energy and transmission contracts. In addition, EME had issued letters of credit of $7 million in support of commodity contracts at
June 30, 2006.

Future
cash collateral requirements may be higher than the margin and collateral requirements at June 30, 2006, if wholesale energy prices increase further or the amount hedged
increases. EME estimates that margin and collateral requirements for energy contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2006 could increase by no more than approximately $310 million over the
remaining life of the contracts using a 95% confidence level.

Midwest
Generation has cash on hand and a $500 million working capital facility to support margin requirements specifically related to contracts entered into by EMMT related to
the Illinois Plants. At June 30, 2006, Midwest Generation had borrowed $200 million under this credit facility which was partially used to finance margin advances to EMMT of
$142 million. In addition, EME has cash on hand and a $500 million working capital facility to provide credit support to subsidiaries. See "EME Financing Developments" and
"EME's Liquidity as a Holding Company" for further discussion.

EME's Liquidity as a Holding Company

Overview

At June 30, 2006, EME had corporate cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $1.3 billion to meet liquidity needs. See
"EME's Liquidity." Cash distributions from EME's subsidiaries and partnership investments and unused capacity under its corporate credit facility represent EME's major sources of
liquidity to meet its cash requirements. The timing and amount of distributions from EME's subsidiaries may be affected by many factors beyond its control. See "Dividend Restrictions in
Major Financings."

EME Homer City Interim Funding Arrangements

During March 2006, EME, through its subsidiary, Edison Mission Finance, advanced funds in the amount of $9 million to EME Homer City under the
subordinated revolving loan agreement in place between Edison Mission Finance and EME Homer City. The funds were used to assist EME Homer City with a cash shortfall resulting from reduced revenues and
higher maintenance expenses caused by the Unit 3 outage. For similar reasons, at the end of March 2006 and April 2006, EMMT made advance payments to EME Homer City in the amounts of
$43.5 million and $20 million, respectively, against future deliveries of power to it under its trading arrangements with EME Homer City. The proceeds of the subordinated loans were
deposited in EME Homer City's operating account and the

40

---



prepayment
by EMMT was deposited in EME Homer City's revenue account. It is currently anticipated that a substantial portion of the advance payments will be applied against amounts invoiced to EMMT
within the next 12 months.

Historical Distributions Received By EME

The following table is presented as an aid in understanding the cash flow of EME's continuing operations and its various subsidiary holding companies which depend
on distributions from subsidiaries and affiliates to fund general and administrative costs and debt service costs of recourse debt.

Six Months Ended
June 30,2006

2005(in millions)Distributions from Consolidated Operating Projects:Edison Mission Midwest Holdings (Illinois Plants)

$
380

$
171EME Homer City Generation L.P. (Homer City facilities)





41Holding companies of other consolidated operating projects


3


Distributions from Unconsolidated Operating Projects:Edison Mission Energy Funding Corp. (Big 4 Projects)(1)


41


29Sunrise Power Company


7


5Holding company for Doga project





17Holding companies for Westside projects


6


6Holding companies of other unconsolidated operating projects


1


4Total Distributions

$
438

$
273


---

Intercompany Tax-Allocation Agreement

EME is included in the consolidated federal and combined state income tax returns of Edison International and is eligible to participate in
tax-allocation payments with other subsidiaries of Edison International in circumstances where domestic tax losses are incurred. The right of EME to receive and the amount of and timing of
tax-allocation payments are dependent on the inclusion of EME in the consolidated income tax returns of Edison International and its subsidiaries and other factors, including the
consolidated taxable income of Edison International and its subsidiaries, the amount of net operating losses and other tax items of EME, its subsidiaries, and other subsidiaries of Edison
International and specific procedures regarding allocation of state taxes. EME receives tax-allocation payments for tax losses when and to the extent that the
consolidated Edison International group generates sufficient taxable income in order to be able to utilize EME's consolidated tax losses in the consolidated income tax returns for Edison International
and its subsidiaries. Based on the application of the factors cited above, EME is obligated during periods it generates taxable income to make payments under the tax-allocation agreements.
EME made tax-allocation payments to Edison International of $162 million during the first six months of 2006. EME received tax-allocation payments from Edison
International of $3 million during the first six months of 2005.

41

---



Dividend Restrictions in Major Financings

General

Each of EME's direct or indirect subsidiaries is organized as a legal entity separate and apart from EME and its other subsidiaries. Assets of EME's subsidiaries
are not available to satisfy EME's obligations or the obligations of any of its other subsidiaries. However, unrestricted cash or other assets that are available for distribution may, subject to
applicable law and the terms of financing arrangements of the parties, be advanced, loaned, paid as dividends or otherwise distributed or contributed to EME or to its subsidiary holding companies.

Key Ratios of EME's Principal Subsidiaries Affecting Dividends

Set forth below are key ratios of EME's principal subsidiaries required by financing arrangements for the twelve months ended June 30, 2006:

|Subsidiary                                             |  | Financial Ratio                    |  | Covenant                           |  | Actual      
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Midwest Generation, LLC (Illinois Plants)              |  | Interest Coverage Ratio            |  | Greater than or equal to 1.40 to 1 |  | 6.45 to 1   
|Midwest Generation, LLC (Illinois Plants)              |  | Secured Leverage Ratio             |  | Less than or equal to 7.25 to 1    |  | 2.00 to 1   
|EME Homer City Generation L.P. (Homer City facilities) |  | Senior Rent Service Coverage Ratio |  | Greater than 1.7 to 1              |  | 2.26 to 1(1)

---

For a more detailed description of the covenants binding EME's principal subsidiaries that may restrict the ability of those entities to make
distributions to EME directly or indirectly through the other holding companies owned by EME, refer to "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesDividend Restrictions in Major Financings" of EME's annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

For a discussion of EME's off-balance sheet transactions, refer to "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesOff-Balance Sheet Transactions" of EME's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005. There have been no significant developments with respect to EME's off-balance sheet transactions that affect disclosures presented in EME's annual report.

Environmental Matters and Regulations

For a discussion of EME's environmental matters, refer to "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesEnvironmental Matters and Regulations" of EME's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended

42

---



December 31,
2005 and the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth therein. There have been no significant developments with respect to environmental matters specifically
affecting EME since the filing of EME's annual report, except as follows:

FederalUnited States of America

Clean Air Act

Mercury
Regulation

As
part of its evaluation of environmental control technologies for the Homer City facilities, EME has obtained cost estimates from an engineering and construction company that are
substantially higher than the approximately $350 million to $400 million previously estimated for the 2006-2010 timeframe. The estimated costs have increased for a number of
reasons, including increased material costs and greater demand for environmental control equipment scheduled for installation during the same period. In light of higher estimated capital costs, the
impact of the recent decline in emissions costs and the continued uncertainty over the final provisions of relevant environmental regulations, EME has deferred making commitments for the installation
of further environmental controls at the Homer City facilities at this time. EME plans to study alternative environmental technologies while continuing to review and refine the scope of the project,
estimated costs for control equipment and to monitor developments related to mercury and other environmental regulations.

StateIllinois

Air Quality

On March 14, 2006, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a proposed rule to the Illinois Pollution Control Board (PCB) for adoption. The
proposed rule requires a 90% reduction of mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants averaged across company-owned Illinois stations and a minimum reduction of 75% for individual
generating units by July 1, 2009. A 90% reduction at each station would be required by 2013. The first hearing on the rule was held in June 2006 and a second hearing is set for
August 2006.

43

---



MARKET RISK EXPOSURES

Introduction

EME's primary market risk exposures are associated with the sale of electricity and capacity from and the procurement of fuel for its merchant power plants. These
market risks arise from fluctuations in electricity, capacity and fuel prices, emission allowances, and transmission rights. Additionally, EME's financial results can be affected by fluctuations in
interest rates. EME manages these risks in part by using derivative financial instruments in accordance with established policies and procedures.

This
section discusses these market risk exposures under the following headings:

PageCommodity Price Risk

44Credit Risk

51Interest Rate Risk

52Fair Value of Financial Instruments

53Regulatory Matters

54


For a complete discussion of these issues, read this quarterly report on Form 10-Q in conjunction with EME's annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Commodity Price Risk

General Overview

EME's revenues and results of operations of its merchant power plants will depend upon prevailing market prices for capacity, energy, ancillary services, emission
allowances or credits, coal, natural gas and fuel oil, and associated transportation costs in the market areas where EME's merchant plants are located. Among the factors that influence the price of
energy, capacity and ancillary services in these markets are:



44

---





A
discussion of commodity price risk for the Illinois Plants and the Homer City facilities is set forth below.

Introduction

EME's merchant operations expose it to commodity price risk, which represents the potential loss that can be caused by a change in the market value of a
particular commodity. Commodity price risks are actively monitored by a risk management committee to ensure compliance with EME's risk management policies. Policies are in place which define risk
management processes, and procedures exist which allow for monitoring of all commitments and positions with regular reviews by EME's risk management committee. Despite this, there can be no assurance
that all risks have been accurately identified, measured and/or mitigated.

In
addition to prevailing market prices, EME's ability to derive profits from the sale of electricity will be affected by the cost of production, including costs incurred to comply with
environmental regulations. The costs of production of the units vary and, accordingly, depending on market
conditions, the amount of generation that will be sold from the units is expected to vary from unit to unit.

EME
uses "value at risk" to identify, measure, monitor and control its overall market risk exposure in respect of its Illinois Plants, its Homer City facilities, and its trading
positions. The use of value at risk allows management to aggregate overall commodity risk, compare risk on a consistent basis and identify the risk factors. Value at risk measures the possible loss
over a given time interval, under normal market conditions, at a given confidence level. Given the inherent limitations of value at risk and relying on a single risk measurement tool, EME supplements
this approach with the use of stress testing and worst-case scenario analysis for key risk factors, as well as stop loss limits and counterparty credit exposure limits.

Hedging Strategy

To reduce its exposure to market risk, EME hedges a portion of its merchant portfolio risk through EMMT, an EME subsidiary engaged in the power marketing and
trading business. To the extent that EME does not hedge its merchant portfolio, the unhedged portion will be subject to the risks and benefits of spot market price movements. Hedge transactions are
primarily implemented through the use of contracts cleared on the Intercontinental Trading Exchange and the New York Mercantile Exchange. Hedge transactions are also entered into as forward sales to
utilities and power marketing companies.

The
extent to which EME hedges its market price risk depends on several factors. First, EME evaluates over-the-counter market prices to determine whether sales at
forward market prices are sufficiently attractive compared to assuming the risk associated with fluctuating spot market sales. Second, EME's ability to enter into hedging transactions depends upon its
and Midwest Generation's credit capacity and upon the forward sales markets having sufficient liquidity to enable EME to identify appropriate counterparties for hedging transactions.

In
the case of hedging transactions related to the generation and capacity of the Illinois Plants, Midwest Generation is permitted to use its working capital facility and cash on hand to
provide credit support for these hedging transactions entered into by EMMT under an energy services agreement

45

---



between
Midwest Generation and EMMT. Utilization of this credit facility in support of hedging transactions provides additional liquidity support for implementation of EME's contracting strategy for
the Illinois Plants. In the case of hedging transactions related to the generation and capacity of the Homer City facilities, credit support is provided by EME pursuant to intercompany arrangements
between it and EMMT. See "Credit Risk," below.

Energy Price Risk Affecting Sales from the Illinois Plants

All the energy and capacity from the Illinois Plants is sold under terms, including price and quantity, negotiated by EMMT with customers through a combination of
bilateral agreements, forward energy sales and spot market sales. As discussed further below, power generated at the Illinois Plants is generally sold into the PJM market.

Midwest
Generation sells its power into PJM at spot prices based upon locational marginal pricing. Hedging transactions related to the generation of the Illinois Plants are generally
entered into at the Northern Illinois Hub in PJM, and may also be entered into at other trading hubs, including the AEP/Dayton Hub in PJM and the Cinergy Hub in the MISO. These trading hubs have been
the most liquid locations for hedging purposes. However, hedging transactions which settle at points other than the Northern Illinois Hub are subject to the possibility of basis risk. See
"Basis Risk" below for further discussion.

PJM
has a short-term market, which establishes an hourly clearing price. The Illinois Plants are situated in the PJM control area and are physically connected to
high-voltage transmission lines serving this market.

The
following table depicts the average historical market prices for energy per megawatt-hour during the first six months of 2006 and 2005.

24-Hour
Northern Illinois Hub
Historical Energy Prices(1)2006

2005January

$
42.27

$
38.36February


42.66


34.92March


42.50


45.75April


43.16


38.98May


39.96


33.60June


34.80


42.45Six-Month Average

$
40.89

$
39.01


---

Forward market prices at the Northern Illinois Hub fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including natural gas prices, transmission
congestion, changes in market rules, electricity demand (which in turn is affected by weather, economic growth, and other factors), plant outages in the region, and the amount of existing and planned
power plant capacity. The actual spot prices for electricity delivered by the Illinois Plants into these markets may vary materially from the forward market prices set forth in the table below.

46

---



The
following table sets forth the forward market prices for energy per megawatt-hour as quoted for sales into the Northern Illinois Hub at June 30, 2006:

24-Hour
Northern Illinois Hub
Forward Energy Prices(1)2006July

$
43.77August


47.64September


36.86October


33.17November


38.21December


50.372007 Calendar "strip"(2)

$
45.492008 Calendar "strip"(2)

$
45.10


---

The following table summarizes Midwest Generation's hedge position (primarily based on prices at the Northern Illinois Hub) at June 30,
2006:

2006

2007

2008Megawatt hours


10,039,760


16,237,200


3,072,000Average price/MWh(1)

$
47.61

$
48.25

$
66.13


---

Subsequent to June 30, 2006, EMMT entered into an agreement with a third party to hedge the price risk for 500 MW of on-peak
power from the Illinois Plants for 2007, 2008 and 2009 (using the Northern Illinois Hub as a reference point). Under the terms of the agreement, EME has guaranteed the obligation of EMMT, but neither
EME nor EMMT is required to post margin, provide liens on property or provide other collateral to support the obligations under the agreement.

Energy Price Risk Affecting Sales from the Homer City Facilities

Electric power generated at the Homer City facilities is generally sold into the PJM market. PJM has a short-term market, which establishes an hourly
clearing price. The Homer City facilities are situated in the PJM control area and are physically connected to high-voltage transmission lines serving both the PJM and NYISO markets.

47

---



The
following table depicts the average historical market prices for energy per megawatt-hour at the Homer City busbar and in PJM West Hub during the first six months of 2006
and 2005:

Historical Energy Prices(1)
24-Hour PJMHomer City

West Hub2006

2005

2006

2005January

$
48.67

$
45.82

$
54.57

$
49.53February


49.54


39.40


56.39


42.05March


53.26


47.42


58.30


49.97April


48.50


44.27


49.92


44.55May


44.71


43.67


48.55


43.64June


38.78


46.63


45.78


53.72Six-Month Average

$
47.24

$
44.54

$
52.25

$
47.24


---

Forward market prices at the PJM West Hub fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including natural gas prices, transmission congestion,
changes in market rules, electricity demand (which in turn is affected by weather, economic growth and other factors), plant outages in the region, and the amount of existing and planned power plant
capacity. The actual spot prices for electricity delivered by the Homer City facilities into these markets may vary materially from the forward market prices set forth in the table below.

The
following table sets forth the forward market prices for energy per megawatt-hour as quoted for sales into the PJM West Hub at June 30, 2006:

24-Hour
PJM West Hub
Forward Energy Prices(1)2006July

$
59.69August


63.18September


49.56October


48.23November


53.15December


65.252007 Calendar "strip"(2)

$
63.802008 Calendar "strip"(2)

$
62.58


---

48

---



The following table summarizes Homer City's hedge position at June 30, 2006:

2006

2007

2008Megawatt hours


4,415,900


7,590,000


2,371,200Average price/MWh(1)

$
54.07

$
64.35

$
66.01


---

The average price/MWh for Homer City's hedge position is based on PJM West Hub. Energy prices at the Homer City busbar have been lower than energy
prices at the PJM West Hub. See "Basis Risk" below for a discussion of the difference.

Basis Risk

Sales made from the Illinois Plants and the Homer City facilities in the real-time or day-ahead market receive the actual spot prices at
the busbars (delivery points) of the individual plants. In order to mitigate price risk from changes in spot prices at the individual plant busbars, EME may enter into cash settled futures contracts
as well as forward contracts with counterparties for energy to be delivered in future periods. Currently, a liquid market for entering into these contracts at the individual plant busbars does not
exist. A liquid market does exist for a settlement point at the PJM West Hub in the case of the Homer City facilities and for a settlement point at the Northern Illinois Hub in the case of the
Illinois Plants. EME's price risk management activities use these settlement points (and, to a lesser extent, other similar trading hubs) to enter into hedging contracts. EME's revenues with respect
to such forward contracts include:



Under
PJM's market design, locational marginal pricing, which establishes market prices at specific locations throughout PJM by considering factors including generator bids, load
requirements, transmission congestion and losses, can cause the price of a specific delivery point to be higher or lower relative to other locations depending on how the point is affected by
transmission constraints. To the extent that, on the settlement date of a hedge contract, spot prices at the relevant busbar are lower than spot prices at the settlement point, the proceeds actually
realized from the related hedge contract are effectively reduced by the difference. This is referred to as "basis risk." During the six months ended June 30, 2006, transmission congestion in
PJM has resulted in prices at the Homer City busbar being lower than those at the PJM West Hub (EME Homer City's primary trading hub) by an average of 10%, compared to 6% during the six months ended
June 30, 2005. The monthly average difference during the twelve months ended June 30, 2006 ranged from 3% to 20%, which occurred in August 2005. In contrast to the Homer City
facilities, during the past 12 months, the prices at the Northern Illinois Hub were substantially the same as those at the individual busbars of the Illinois Plants.

By
entering into cash settled futures contracts and forward contracts using the PJM West Hub and the Northern Illinois Hub (or other similar trading hubs) as settlement points, EME is
exposed to basis risk as described above. In order to mitigate basis risk, EME has purchased 7.8 TWh of financial

49

---



transmission
rights and basis swaps in PJM for Homer City during the period July 1, 2006 through May 31, 2007, and may continue to purchase financial transmission rights and basis swaps
in the future. A financial transmission right is a financial instrument that entitles the holder to receive the difference of actual spot prices for two delivery points in exchange for a fixed amount.
Accordingly, EME's price risk management activities include using financial transmission rights alone or in combination with forward contracts and basis swap contracts to manage basis risk.

Coal Price and Transportation Risk

The Illinois Plants use approximately 18 million to 20 million tons of coal annually, primarily obtained from the Southern Powder River Basin of
Wyoming. In addition, the Homer City facilities use approximately 5 million to 6 million tons of coal annually, obtained primarily from mines located near the facilities in Pennsylvania.
Coal purchases are made under a variety of supply agreements with terms ranging from one year to eight years. The following table summarizes the percent of expected coal requirements for the next five
years that were under contract at June 30, 2006.

Percent of Coal Requirements
Under Contract2006(1)

2007

2008

2009

2010Illinois Plants

108%

95%

33%

33%

33%Homer City facilities

99%

97%

39%

15%

0%


---

EME is subject to price risk for purchases of coal that are not under contract. Prices of Northern Appalachian (NAPP) coal, which is related to
the price of coal purchased for the Homer City facilities, increased considerably during 2005. The price of NAPP coal (with 13,000 British Thermal units (Btu) per pound heat content and
<3.0 pounds of SO2 per MMBtu sulfur content) fluctuated between $44 per ton and $57 per ton during 2005, with a price of $45 per ton at December 30, 2005, as reported by the Energy
Information Administration. The 2005 overall increase in the NAPP coal price was largely attributed to greater demand from domestic power producers and increased international shipments of coal to
Asia. During the first six months of 2006, the price of NAPP coal decreased to $37.50 per ton at June 23, 2006, as reported by the Energy Information Administration, due to the combined effects
of a mild winter, easing natural gas prices and improving eastern stockpiles. Prices of Powder River Basin (PRB) coal (with 8,800 Btu per pound heat content and 0.8 pounds of SO2 per MMBtu sulfur
content), which is purchased for the Illinois Plants, significantly increased in 2005 due to the curtailment of coal shipments during 2005 due to increased PRB coal demand from other regions (east),
rail constraints (discussed below), higher oil and natural gas prices and higher prices for SO2 allowances. On June 23, 2006, the Energy Information Administration reported the price of PRB
coal to be $12.25 per ton, which compares to 2005 prices that ranged from $6.20 per ton to $18.48 per ton. The price of PRB coal decreased during the first six months of 2006 from
2005 year-end prices due to easing natural gas prices, lower prices for SO2 allowances and mild weather during the first six months of 2006.

After
two derailments in May 2005, the railroads that bring coal from the PRB mines to the Illinois Plants discovered significant problems with the joint-rail line that serves the
PRB mines. Repairs to the joint-rail line are expected to continue through most of 2006. Even though some restrictions in coal shipments have occurred while repairs are being completed, EME expects to
continue receiving a sufficient amount of coal to generate power based on communications with the railroad companies.

50

---



Emission Allowances Price Risk

The federal Acid Rain Program requires electric generating stations to hold SO2 allowances, and Illinois and Pennsylvania regulations implemented the federal NOx
SIP Call requirement. Under these programs, EME purchases (or sells) emission allowances based on the amounts required for actual generation in excess of (or less than) the amounts allocated under
these programs. As part of the acquisition of the Illinois Plants and the Homer City facilities, EME obtained the rights to the emission allowances that have been or are allocated to these plants.

The
price of emission allowances, particularly SO2 allowances issued through the federal Acid Rain Program, decreased during the first half of 2006 from 2005 year-end
prices. The average price of purchased SO2 allowances decreased to $899 per ton during the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $1,219 per ton during 2005. The decrease in the price of SO2
allowances during the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 2005 year-end prices has been attributed to lower loads in January 2006 and a decline in natural gas prices.
The price of SO2 allowances, determined by obtaining broker quotes and information from other public sources, was $750 per ton as of July 31, 2006.

For
a discussion of environmental regulations related to emissions, refer to "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesEnvironmental Matters and Regulations" of EME's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.

Credit Risk

In conducting EME's price risk management and trading activities, EME contracts with a number of utilities, energy companies, financial institutions, and other
companies, collectively referred to as counterparties. In the event a counterparty were to default on its trade obligation, EME would be exposed to the risk of possible loss associated with
re-contracting the product at a price different from the original contracted price if the non-performing counterparty were unable to pay the resulting liquidated damages owed
to EME. Further, EME would be exposed to the risk of non-payment of accounts receivable accrued for products delivered prior to the time a counterparty defaulted.

To
manage credit risk, EME looks at the risk of a potential default by counterparties. Credit risk is measured by the loss that would be incurred if counterparties failed to perform
pursuant to the terms of their contractual obligations. EME measures, monitors and mitigates credit risk to the extent possible. To mitigate credit risk from counterparties, master netting agreements
are used whenever possible and counterparties may be required to pledge collateral when deemed necessary. EME also takes other appropriate steps to limit or lower credit exposure. Processes have also
been established to
determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties. EME manages the credit risk on the portfolio based on credit ratings using published ratings of counterparties and other publicly
disclosed information, such as financial statements, regulatory filings, and press releases, to guide it in the process of setting credit levels, risk limits and contractual arrangements, including
master netting agreements. A risk management committee regularly reviews the credit quality of EME's counterparties. Despite this, there can be no assurance that these efforts will be wholly
successful in mitigating credit risk or that collateral pledged will be adequate.

EME
measures credit risk exposure from counterparties of its merchant energy activities as either: (i) the sum of 60 days of accounts receivable, current fair value of open
positions, and a credit value at risk, or (ii) the sum of delivered and unpaid accounts receivable and the current fair value of open positions. EME's subsidiaries enter into master agreements
and other arrangements in conducting price risk management and trading activities which typically provide for a right of setoff in the event of

51

---



bankruptcy
or default by the counterparty. Accordingly, EME's credit risk exposure from counterparties is based on net exposure under these agreements. At June 30, 2006, the amount of exposure,
broken down by the credit ratings of EME's counterparties, was as follows:

S&P Credit Rating

June 30, 2006(in millions)A or higher

$
88A-


18BBB+


52BBB


65BBB-


Below investment grade


2Total

$
225


EME's plants owned by unconsolidated affiliates in which EME owns an interest sell power under power purchase agreements. Generally, each plant
sells its output to one counterparty. Accordingly, a default by a counterparty under a power purchase agreement, including a default as a result of a bankruptcy, would likely have a material adverse
effect on the operations of such power plant.

In
addition, coal for the Illinois Plants and the Homer City facilities is purchased from suppliers under contracts which may be for multiple years. A number of the coal suppliers to the
Illinois Plants and the Homer City facilities do not currently have an investment grade credit rating and, accordingly, EME may have limited recourse to collect damages in the event of default by a
supplier. EME seeks to mitigate this risk through diversification of its coal suppliers and through guarantees and other collateral arrangements when available. Despite this, there can be no assurance
that these efforts will be successful in mitigating credit risk from coal suppliers.

EME's
merchant plants sell electric power generally into the PJM market by participating in PJM's capacity and energy markets or transact capacity and energy on a bilateral basis. Sales
into PJM accounted for approximately 69% of EME's consolidated operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Moody's Investors Service rates PJM's senior unsecured debt Aa3. PJM,
an independent system operator with over 300 member companies, maintains its own credit risk policies and does not extend unsecured credit to non-investment grade companies. Any losses due
to a PJM member default are shared by all other members based upon a predetermined formula. At June 30, 2006, EME's account receivable due from PJM was $70 million.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate changes can affect earnings and the cost of capital for capital improvements or new investments in power projects. EME mitigates the risk of
interest rate fluctuations by arranging for fixed rate financing or variable rate financing with interest rate swaps, interest rate options or other hedging mechanisms for a number of its project
financings. The fair market values of long-term fixed interest rate obligations are subject to interest rate risk. The fair market value of EME's consolidated long-term
obligations (including current portion) was $3.5 billion at June 30, 2006, compared to the carrying value of $3.4 billion.

52

---



Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Non-Trading Derivative Financial Instruments

The following table summarizes the fair values for outstanding derivative financial instruments used in EME's continuing operations for purposes other than
trading, by risk category (in millions):

June 30,
2006

December 31,
2005Commodity price:Electricity

$
(3
)
$
(434
)


In assessing the fair value of EME's non-trading derivative financial instruments, EME uses a variety of methods and assumptions based
on the market conditions and associated risks existing at each balance sheet date. The fair value of commodity price contracts takes into account quoted market prices, time value of money, volatility
of the underlying commodities and other factors. The following table summarizes the maturities and the related fair value, based on actively traded prices, of EME's commodity price risk management
assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2006 (in millions):

Total Fair
Value

Maturity
<1 year

Maturity
1 to 3
years

Maturity
4 to 5
years

Maturity
>5 yearsPrices actively quoted

$
(3
)
$
5

$
(8
)
$


$



Energy Trading Derivative Financial Instruments

The fair value of the commodity financial instruments related to energy trading activities as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, are set forth
below (in millions):

June 30, 2006

December 31, 2005Assets

Liabilities

Assets

LiabilitiesElectricity

$
120

$
4

$
127

$
27Other


1


2


1


Total

$
121

$
6

$
128

$
27


The change in the fair value of trading contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2006, was as follows (in millions):

Fair value of trading contracts at January 1, 2006

$
101Net gains from energy trading activities


59Amount realized from energy trading activities


(52
)Other changes in fair value


7Fair value of trading contracts at June 30, 2006

$
115


Quoted market prices are used to determine the fair value of the financial instruments related to energy trading activities, except for the power
sales agreement with an unaffiliated electric utility that EME's subsidiary purchased and restructured and a long-term power supply agreement with another unaffiliated party. EME's
subsidiary recorded these agreements at fair value based upon a discounting of future electricity prices derived from a proprietary model using a discount rate equal to the cost of

53

---



borrowing
the non-recourse debt incurred to finance the purchase of the power supply agreement. The following table summarizes the maturities, the valuation method and the related fair
value of energy trading assets and liabilities (as of June 30, 2006) (in millions):

Total Fair
Value

Maturity
<1 year

Maturity
1 to 3
years

Maturity
4 to 5
years

Maturity
>5 yearsPrices actively quoted

$
29

$
26

$
3

$


$
Prices based on models and other valuation methods


86


1


11


17


57Total

$
115

$
27

$
14

$
17

$
57


Regulatory Matters

For a discussion of EME's regulatory matters, refer to "Item 1. BusinessRegulatory Matters" of EME's annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005. There have been no significant developments with respect to regulatory matters specifically affecting EME since the filing of EME's annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, except as follows:

PJM Reliability Pricing Model

On August 31, 2005, PJM filed under sections 205 and 206 of the Federal Power Act a proposal for a reliability pricing model (RPM) to replace its existing
capacity construct. The proposal offers RPM as a new capacity construct to address the deficiencies in PJM's current structure in a comprehensive and integrated manner. On April 20, 2006, the
FERC issued an Initial Order on RPM, finding that as a result of a combination of factors, PJM's existing capacity construct is unjust and unreasonable as a long-term capacity solution,
because it fails to set prices adequate to ensure energy resources to meet its reliability responsibilities. Although the FERC did not find that the RPM proposal, as filed by PJM, is the just and
reasonable replacement for the current capacity construct because some elements of the proposal need further development and elaboration, it did find that certain elements of the RPM proposal, with
some adjustment and clarification, may form the basis for a just and reasonable capacity market. Accordingly, in the order the FERC provided guidance on PJM's RPM proposal, as well as other features
that need to be included in a just and reasonable capacity market, and established further proceedings to resolve these issues.

MISO Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee Charges

On April 25, 2006, the FERC issued an order regarding the MISO's "Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee" charges (RSG charges). The MISO's business practice
manuals and other instructions to market participants have stated, since the implementation of market operations on April 1, 2005, that RSG charges will not be imposed on offers to supply power
not supported by actual generation (also known as virtual supply offers). However, some market participants raised questions about the language of the MISO's tariff concerning that issue and, in
October 2005, the MISO submitted to the FERC proposed tariff revisions clarifying its tariff to reflect its business practices with respect to RSG charges and filed corrected tariff sheets
exempting virtual supply from RSG charges. In its April 25 decision, the FERC interpreted the MISO's tariff to require that virtual supply offers must be included in the calculation of the RSG
charges and that, to the extent that the MISO did not charge virtual supply offers for RSG charges, it violated the terms of its tariff. The FERC order then proceeded to require the MISO to
recalculate the RSG charges back to April 1, 2005, and to make refunds to customers, with interest, reflecting the recalculated charges. In order to make such refunds, it is likely that the
MISO will attempt to impose retroactively RSG charges on those who submitted virtual supply offers

54

---



during
the recalculation period. EMMT made virtual supply offers in the MISO during this period on which no RSG charges were imposed, and thus may be subject to a claim for refunds from the MISO
(which claim will be contested by EMMT). Because calculation of any claimed liability for refunds depends on information not currently available to it, EMMT cannot reasonably estimate a range of loss
related to this matter. In addition, the FERC's April 25 order has been challenged by the MISO and other parties, including EMMT, and as the FERC has issued an extension of time to comply with
the requirements of the order until after the date of issuance of an order on rehearing, the eventual outcome of these proceedings is unclear. The FERC order also requires the MISO to modify its
tariff on a prospective basis to impose RSG charges on virtual supply offers. At this time, it is not possible to predict how the prospective effect of the order will affect the nature and operation
of the MISO markets.

FERC Order Regarding PJM Marginal Losses

On May 1, 2006, the FERC issued an order in response to a complaint filed by Pepco Holdings, Inc. against PJM regarding marginal losses for
transmission. The FERC concluded that PJM had violated its tariff by not implementing marginal losses and further directed PJM to implement marginal losses by October 2, 2006. Implementation of
marginal losses will adjust the algorithm that calculates locational marginal prices to include a marginal loss component in addition to the already included congestion component. This may have an
adverse impact on sellers in the Western PJM and Northern Illinois regions. On June 19, 2006, the FERC issued an order delaying implementation of marginal losses in PJM until June 1,
2007, and at this time it is not possible to predict how the prospective effect of the order will affect the prices at which EME Homer City and Midwest Generation will be able to sell their power.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

For a discussion of market risk sensitive instruments, refer to "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsMarket Risk Exposures" of EME's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Refer to "Market Risk Exposures" in Item 2 of this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for an update to that disclosure.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

EME's management, with the participation of the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of EME's disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period, EME's disclosure controls
and procedures are effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in EME's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, EME's internal control over financial reporting.

55

---



PART II  OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

No material legal proceedings are presently pending against EME.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

For a discussion of the risks, uncertainties, and other important factors which could materially affect EME's business, financial condition, or future results,
refer to "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of EME's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. The risks described in EME's annual report on
Form 10-K are not the only risks facing EME. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known, or that are currently deemed to be immaterial, also may materially
adversely affect EME's business, financial condition or future results.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.

Description31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.31.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.32

Statement Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.


56

---





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.

| |  | EDISON MISSION ENERGY
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | By:                  
| |  | Date:                

57

---



QuickLinks