alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-181-CR

JOHN D. MOORE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant John D. Moore attempts to appeal from the order on his motion 

for DNA testing, which the trial court denied on January 5, 2010. Moore filed his 

notice of appeal on April 26, 2010, although it was due on February 4, 2010. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

On May 19, 2010, we sent a letter to Moore stating that we were 

concerned that we may not have jurisdiction over his appeal because his notice 

of appeal was not timely filed. We stated that the appeal could be dismissed for 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed 

with this court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 44.3. Moore filed a response contending that this court has 

jurisdiction over his appeal because he did not receive notice of the order until 

April 6, 2010. 

Our appellate jurisdiction over a criminal appeal is triggered through a 

timely notice of appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1996). Although a party who does not receive notice of a judgment or order 

is given additional time to file a notice of appeal in a civil case, there is no 

comparable rule for criminal cases. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.2; Tex. R. Civ. P. 

306a. But see Rodriguez v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Supreme Judicial Dist., 769 

S.W.2d 554, 557 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989) (stating that an out-of-time appeal may 

be granted in the exercise of original habeas jurisdiction). In the absence of a 

timely notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address 

the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to 

dismiss the appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1998).
3

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 19, 2010
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 30, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 30, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0419. IN THE INTEREST OF J. M., A CHILD (FATHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Juvenile Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2021104J044
**Exhibit
      32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**
 **18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
      connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Patent
      Development Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended September
      30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
      knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
      HARVEY P.
      EISEN
 Name:         Harvey
      P. Eisen
 Title:           Chief
      Executive Officer
 Date:           November
      14, 2007
 
 
 
 /s/
      IRA J.
      SOBOTKO
 Name:         Ira
      J. Sobotko
 Title:           Vice
      President, Finance
 Date:           November
      14, 2007
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
 Company
    
    Ownership
    
    State of IncorporationThe State Bank
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganDavison State Bank
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganCommunity Bank Services, Inc.
    
    100% by The State Bank
    
    MichiganFentura Mortgage Company
    
    100% by The State Bank
    
    MichiganWest Michigan Community Bank
    
    
    100
    %
    
    MichiganWest Michigan Mortgage, LLC
    
    100% by West Michigan Community Bank
    
    MichiganCommunity Insurance Services, Inc.
    
    100% by West Michigan Community Bank
    
    Michigan
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Donald R. Kiepert,
Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report of Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of Point Therapeutics, Inc.



By:

/s/    DONALD R. KIEPERT, JR.Name: Title: Date:

Donald R. Kiepert, Jr. President and Chief Executive
Officer March 12, 2004




I, Richard N.
Small, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Point Therapeutics, Inc.



By:

/s/    RICHARD N. SMALLName: Title:

Richard N. Small Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial OfficerDate:

March 12, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Point Therapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Point Therapeutics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SWAN BEACH COROLLA, L.L.C., et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF CURRITUCK, et al., Defendants.

No. COA15-293.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed in part; Dismissed in part.
Leslie Aaron Bunch, Plaintiff, v. Danielle Kennedy Bunch, Defendant.

No. COA16-263

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 4, 2016

AFFIRMED.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 18, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 04-21007

SANDRA F. McKINNEY

Plaintiff - Appellant

VERSUS

PFIZER, INC.

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas, Houston

4:03-CV-4988

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed essentially for

the reasons stated in its careful Memorandum and Order of November,

12, 2004.

AFFIRMED.
In the Matter of A.D.B., A.D.B., Minor Children.

No. COA15-400.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 6, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Yakutat Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Yakutat, Alaska. The purpose of the meeting is continue business of the Yakutat Resource Advisory Committee. The committee was formed to carry out the requirements of the Secure Rural Schools and Self-Determination Act of 2000. The agenda for this meeting is to review submitted project proposals and consider recommending projects for funding. Project proposals are due by February 14, 2005, to be considered at this meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held February 18, 2005, from 6-9 p.m. and will continue on February 19, 2005, from 9-12 a.m., if necessary.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the Kwaan Conference Room, 712 Ocean Cape Drive, Yakutat, Alaska. Send written comments to Tricia O'Connor, c/o Forest Service, USDA, P.O. Box 327 Yakutat, AK 99689, (907) 784-3359 or electronically to                         *poconnor@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tricia O'Connor, District Ranger and Designated Federal Official, Yakutat Ranger District, (907) 784-3359.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Council discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Council members. However, persons who wish to bring resource projects or other Resource Advisory Committee matters to the attention of the Council may file written statements with the Council staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by February 14, 2005, will have the opportunity to address the Council at those sessions.

Dated: January 21, 2005.

Patricia M. O'Connor,

District Ranger, Yakutat Ranger District, Tongass National Forest.

[FR Doc. 05-1871  Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT II

                     UNIVERSAL AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Three Months Ended September 30,    Nine Months Ended September 30,
                                                            1999            1998               1999            1998
                                                            ----            ----               ----            ----
<S>                                                      <C>             <C>                <C>              <C>
BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Net income (loss)                                        $ (135,540)     $ (76,275)         $ (328,536)      $ 315,396
                                                         ==========      =========          ==========       =========
Weighted average common shares outstanding                6,793,777      6,769,425           6,783,411       6,769,425
                                                         ==========      =========          ==========       =========
Basic net income (loss) per common share                     $(0.02)        $(0.01)             $(0.05)          $0.05
                                                         ==========      =========          ==========       =========

DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Net income (loss)                                        $ (135,540)     $ (76,275)         $ (328,536)      $ 315,396
                                                         ==========      =========          ==========       =========
Weighted average common shares outstanding                6,793,777      6,769,425           6,783,411       6,769,425
Options and warrants assumed to be common stock
        equivalents using treasury stock method
                                                                  0              0                   0           1,934
                                                         ----------      ---------          ----------       ---------

Weighted average common shares outstanding, as
        adjusted                                          6,793,777      6,769,425           6,783,411       6,771,359
                                                         ==========      =========          ==========       =========
Diluted net income (loss) per common share                   $(0.02)        $(0.01)             $(0.05)          $0.05
                                                         ==========      =========          ==========       =========

</TABLE>



302988



                                       13
# C_2009044EN.01001702.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Patent- und Markensenat — Austria) — Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’

(Case C-442/07) (1)

1

(Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 12 - Revocation - Marks registered by a non-profit-making association - Concept of ‘genuine use’ of a trade mark - Charitable activities)

(2009/C 44/28)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Patent- und Markensenat

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Verein Radetzky-Orden

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Patent- und Markensenat — Interpretation of Article 12(1) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1) — Trade marks used on business papers, writing paper, on advertising material and in the form of badges by a non-profit-making association in the context of its activity of seeking to preserve military traditions and collecting and distributing donations — Classification of that use as ‘genuine use’ capable of preserving the rights attached to the mark?

Operative part of the judgment

Article 12(1) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks is to be construed as meaning that a trade mark is put to genuine use where a non-profit-making association uses the trade mark, in its relations with the public, in announcements of forthcoming events, on business papers and on advertising material and where the association's members wear badges featuring that trade mark when collecting and distributing donations.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 99.10

CONSENT OF IAN GLAZIER

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp
Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



|1. | The technical report dated March 14, 2011, as amended March 30, 2011, entitled Red Lake Gold Operation, Ontario, Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Red Lake Report); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Red Lake Report and the Red Lake Gold Mines, and the properties described therein.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration
Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376, 333-181116 and 333-188805 on Form S-8 of the Company.

Date: March
31, 2014



/s/ Ian GlazierName: Ian Glazier, P.Eng.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1129 FLEXSYS AMERICA L.P.,

Appellant,

v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and SINORGCHEM CO., SHANDONG,

Intervenor, and KOREA KUMHO PETROCHEMICAL CO., LTD., KUMHO TIRE USA, INC.,

and KUMHO TIRE CO., INC.,

Intervenors. On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-652. ON MOTION Before DYK 

### Circuit Judge. ORDER Sinorgchem Co., Shandong and Korea Kumho Petrochemical Company, Inc.; Kumho Tire USA, Inc., Kumho Tire Company, Inc. separately move without opposition for leave to intervene. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:The motions are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT 

# FEB 2 4 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Robert M. Masters, Esq. James A. Worth, Esq. Guy W. Chambers, Esq. Carter G. Phillips, Esq. s20 

## utridiarwrit FEB 2 4 2009

JAN HORBALY CLERK

2009-1129 - 2 -
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3910 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3910

   To amend title 39, United States Code, to allow the United States 
 Postal Service to provide nonpostal services, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2014

  Mr. Cohen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 39, United States Code, to allow the United States 
 Postal Service to provide nonpostal services, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expand Nonpostal Services to 
Americans Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO OFFER NONPOSTAL SERVICES.

    Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (7), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (8), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) to provide nonpostal services.''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (e).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of approved Tribal-State compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Tribal-State Off-
Track Wagering Compact between the Peoria Tribe of Indians and the 
State of Oklahoma.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 5, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--
Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. This Compact allows for the 
Tribe to conduct Off-Track wagering.

    Dated: December 21, 2004.
Michael D. Olsen,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 05-189 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Joshua Allen CALLAHAN.

No. COA15-1140.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Vacated and Remanded.