alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 May 2009 – Commission v Spain**

**(Case C‐516/07)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2000/60/EC – Framework for Community action in the field of water policy – Designation of competent authorities for hydrographic districts

1.                     *Environment – Community action in the field of water policy – Directive 2000/60 (European Parliament and Council Directive
2000/60, Arts 2, para. 15, and 3(2), (7) and (8)) (see paras 31-32, 39, 43, 48, 54, 62, 64)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see paras 36, 49, 56, 61)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with Article 3(2), (7) and (8) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ 2000 L 327, p. 1). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to designate the competent authorities for the application of the provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy concerning the Autonomous Communities of Galicia, the Basque Country, Andalusia, the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(2), (7) and (8) of that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
RECITALS
     1.
    
    The final two paragraphs of the Security Agreement are hereby amended to read as follows in
their entirety:Debtor warrants that the address of its chief executive office is 17634 NE Airport Way,
Portland OR 97230, or such other address of which the Debtor notifies the Bank from time to
time.Debtor warrants that the tangible Collateral (except goods in transit or in possession of
repairmen) is or will be located or domiciled at the following additional addresses: 12021
NE Airport Way, Suite B, Portland, OR 97220 (this location is in preparation); 18201 NE
Portal Way, Portland, OR 97230 (this location is in preparation); 12722 NE Airport Way,
Portland, OR 97230; 5352 Performance Way, Whitestown, IN 46075; and 17634 NE Airport Way,
Portland, OR 97230. Debtor sells inventory in the ordinary course of business to LaCrosse
Denmark, which stores it at Niels Ebbesens Vej 19 DK-1911 Frederiksberg, Denmark or at Scan
Global Logistics, True Mollevej 1,8381 Tilst, Denmark, or in transit, and which ships
inventory under customary sale and shipping terms to its customers, and to vendors as
samples, and which disposes of defective or out of date inventory in the ordinary course of
business.
  1




---



##### 



By:
    /s/ Joseph P. SchneiderJoseph P. SchneiderPresident/Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ David P. CarlsonDavid P. CarlsonExecutive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer 
 By:
    /s/ James R. BednarkJames R. BednarkSenior Vice President 2
Eric Deangelo Wigfall, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

June 16, 2016

ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on June 8, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable R. Markley Dennis, Jr. be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Dennis shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Dennis shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SouthCrest Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “ Periodic Report”), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his individual knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 
 Dated: August 14, 2009
 /s/ Larry T. KuglarLarry T. Kuglar
Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RICHARD J. DESABETINO, II,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 309 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 10.27




                                  AMENDMENT TO
                            1994 DIRECTOR OPTION PLAN
                                       OF
                                  HEMASURE INC.


          The 1994 Director Option Plan (the "Plan") be and hereby is amended as
follows:

     1.   The number 100,000 in the second line of Section 4(a) of the Plan
          shall be deleted and the number 250,000 shall be inserted in lieu
          thereof.

     2.   The last sentence of Section 5(b) of the Plan shall be deleted in its
          entirety and a new sentence inserted in lieu thereof which shall read
          as follows:

          "Each Reelection Option granted under the Plan shall be exercisable
          for 3,000 shares of Common Stock, provided, however, that the
          Reelection Options granted under the Plan for directors re-elected at
          the 1996 Annual Meeting of Stockholders shall be for 9,750 shares of
          Common Stock."



          Adopted by the Board of Directors on March 31, 1996 Approved by the
          Stockholders on May 16, 1996





<PAGE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Richard N. Small, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for PointTherapeutics, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 12, 2004
STATE v. Walic Christopher THOMAS.

No. 435A96-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Steven Bryant, Bryson City, for State of N.C.

Marvin Sparrow, Raleigh, for Thomas, Walic Christopher.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Durham, for Thomas, Walic Christopher.

Walic C. Thomas, for Thomas, Walic Christopher.

Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of October 2015 by Defendant to Authorize IDS to Appoint Substitute Counsel:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of Trans  Energy,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Clarence E. Smith , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   CLARENCE E. SMITH
------------------------------------
Clarence E. Smith
Chief Executive Officer
April 27, 2005

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
# C_2008037EN.01002202.xml

| 9.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/22

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2007 — V v Parliament

(Case T-345/05 R III)

(Application for interim measures - Waiver of immunity of a Member of the European Parliament - Application for suspension of operation - No prima facie case)

prima facie

(2008/C 37/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: V (represented by: J Lofthouse, C Hayes and M Monan, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: H Krück, D Moore and M Windisch, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for re-examination of the applicant's first and second applications for interim measures, dismissed by orders of the President of the Court of First Instance on 16 March 2007 and 27 June 2007 in Case T-345/05 R and T-345/05 R II, V v Parliament, not published in the ECR

V

Parliament

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
In the Matter of: A.H., K.H.

No. COA16-187

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 16, 2016

AFFIRMED.
Ex 10.1 Non-EmployeeDirectorCashCompensationPolicy42214






Exhibit 10.1

CALIX, INC.


Non-Employee Director Cash Compensation Policy, as amended April 22, 2014


		
	1.
	General.  This Non-Employee Director Cash Compensation Policy (“Policy”) was adopted by the Board of Directors (“Board”) of Calix, Inc. (“Company”) on and is effective as of April 22, 2014.




		
	2.
	Annual Cash Compensation.  Each member of the board who is not employed by the Company or one of its affiliates shall be entitled to an annual retainer with the amount determined as follows (the net sum for each director, his or her “Annual Retainer”):




	
							
	 
	 
	 
	Amount
	 

	 
	Base Retainer
	 
	$
	40,000
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Committee Service Premiums
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Audit Committee
	 
	$
	10,000
	

	 

	 
	Compensation Committee
	 
	$
	7,500
	

	 

	 
	Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
	 
	$
	5,000
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	

	 

	 
	Chair Premiums
	 
	

	 

	 
	Board Chair
	 
	$
	40,000
	

	 

	 
	Audit Committee
	 
	$
	35,000
	

	 

	 
	Compensation Committee
	 
	$
	20,000
	

	 

	 
	Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
	 
	$
	10,000
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 






		
	3.
	Timing of Payment.  Annual Retainers shall be paid in quarterly installments in arrears on the date of each regularly scheduled quarterly board meeting.  Installments will be pro-rated for any partial period of service.




		
	4.
	Policy Subject to Amendment, Modification and Termination.  This Policy may be amended, modified or terminated by the Board at any time in the future at its sole discretion.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135771 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135771 COA: 274240 Wayne CC: 06-006673-01 JOHNNY BERNARD CALVIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 11, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (974)
<INVENTORY>                                     22,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,007
<PP&E>                                          26,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,288)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,815
<BONDS>                                          2,677
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,734
<SALES>                                        148,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,773
<CGS>                                          103,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,212)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.12)
        

</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 33 E/091)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0934/03

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject:   Seychelles

Has the Commission seen the copies of the videocassettes filmed in the Seychelles by Pauline Ferrari?

Would it not agree that these demonstrate clearly human rights abuses by the regime

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(22 April 2003)

The Commission is not aware of the videocassettes mentioned.

The Community's relations with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States are based on respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, as defined in the Cotonou Agreement.

Should the Commission consider that there is a violation of these values, all appropriate instruments provided for by the Cotonou Agreement will be applied.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW 144663] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW144663 from Crown Oil & Gas Co., Inc. for lands in Sublette County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW144663 effective April 1, 2004, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

Pamela J. Lewis,

Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 05-18460 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P