FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P E A LS E LE V EN T HC IRC U IT AUG 26, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 13839

________________________ D. C. Do c k e tNo . 0 5 - 2 1 7 7 2 - CV- J EM Q A N T U M C O M M U N I C A T I O N S C O R P O R A T I O N , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s S T A R B R O A D C A S T I N G , I N C ., R O N A L D E . H A L E , S R ., D e f e n d a n ts - A p p e lla n ts .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( A u gu s t 26, 2008) B efo re P R Y O R , K R A V IT C H an d C O X , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: S ta rB r o a d c a s tin g , I n c ., a n d its g e n e r a l m a n a g e r , R o n a ld E . H a le , S r ., ap p e a l2

a su m m ary j u d g m en t , d efau l tj u d g m en t , an d aw ard o f d am ag es an d att o rn ey’ s fees agai nstthem and i n favor of Q antum C om m un i ca t i on s, Inc. , w hi ch sued t o rec ov er d a m a g e s f

o ra b r e a c h b y S ta ro f

a n a g r e e m e n t to s e ll th e a s s e ts o f a r a d io s ta tio n to Q a n tu m . W e a f

f ir m . In a w el l -r ea soned o pi ni on , the di stri ctcourtconcl ud ed Q antum w as ent i t l ed t o s um m a ry j udgm e nta nd de f a ul tj udgm e nt , a nd w e c onc l ude tha tthe de c i s i on of the di stri ctcourtw as corr ec t . T he di stri ctcourtexpl ai ned t hatun cont ra di ct ed e v id e n c e in th e r e c o r d e s tab lis h e d a s a m a tte ro f la w th a t S ta rv io la te d th e p la in l angu age of the agree m ent , and Q antum w as ent i t l ed t o the re l i ef i tsoug htun der the l a ngua ge of

the a gr e e m e nt . W e a l s o c onc l ude tha tthe di s tr i c tc our tdi d not abus e i t s di s c r e t i on by gr a nt i ng de f a ul tj udgm e nta ga i ns tS t a ra s a s a nc t i on f or m i s c onduc ta f

t e rthe c our tf

ound tha tH a l e e nga ge d i n a pa tt e rn of s e r i ous m is c o n d u c t. T h e f

a c tu a l f in d in g s b y th e d is tr ic t c o u r t th a t H a le lie d u n d e ro a th abouta c e ntr a l i s s ue i n the c a s e , w i thhe l d di s c ove ry abouttha ti s s ue i n ba d f a i th, and fi l ed a bankrup t cy pet i t i on i n a bad-fai th eff ortt o d el ay the proceedi ng s w er e n o t c le a r ly e rr o n e o u s a n d a m p ly s u p p o r t th e s a n c tio n . W e a l s o a f

f i rm the r e m a i ni ng c om pone nt s of the j udgm e nti n f

a vorof Q a n tu m . W e c o n c lu d e th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t d id n o t c o m m it a n y r e v e r s ib le e rr o rin its a w a r d o f

d a m a g e s . W e a ls o c o n c lu d e th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t d id n o t ab u s e its3

di sc re t i on by aw ar di ng t o Q antum al l of i t s a tt orney’ s f ee s. T he aw ar d w as ap p ro p ri at e i n th e l i g h to f th e “ sch em e o f d el i b erat e m i su se o f th e j u d i ci al p ro cess” by S t a ra nd H a l e . C ha m be r s v. N A S C O , I nc . , 501 U . S . 32, 57, 111 S . C t . 2123, 2 1 3 9 ( 1 9 9 1 ) . A FFI R M ED .