alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SANCHEZ, et al. v. COBBLESTONE HOA OF CLAYTON, INC.

374A16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 21, 2016

J. Matthew Waters, Attorney at Law, Hope Derby Carmichael, Attorney at Law, for Cobblestone HOA Of Clayton, Inc.

Tatita Sanchez, for Sanchez, Tatita M.

Robert A. Spence, Jr., Attorney at Law, Smithfield, for Christopher, Frank.

Dennis Draughon, for Draughon, Dennis, et al.

Robert Sain, for Sain, Robert, et al.

Vincent Franks, Jr., for Franks, Vincent (Jr.)

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 20th of October 2016 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of October 2016."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 12th day of December 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
# C_2009069EN.01003003.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/30

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 1 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio — Italy) — CEPAV DUE — Consorzio ENI per l'Alta Velocità, Consorzio COCIV, Consorzio IRICAV DUE v Office of the President of the Council of Ministers, Ministry of Transport and Others

(Case C-351/07) (1)

1

(2009/C 69/57)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 247, 20.10.2007.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                           1,180,552
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    35,500
<ALLOWANCES>                     0
<INVENTORY>                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 1,216,052
<PP&E>                           10,275,452
<DEPRECIATION>                   352,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   12,464,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            323,780
<BONDS>                          10,432,050
<COMMON>                         613,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      1,589,355
<OTHER-SE>                       (494,810)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     12,464,025
<SALES>                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 426,194
<CGS>                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 193,804
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               317,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (84,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                     0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (84,867)
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     (84,867)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (0.15)
        

</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3934 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to exempt certain flights from 

increased aviation security service fees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2014 

Ms. GABBARD (for herself, Ms. HANABUSA, and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to exempt certain 

flights from increased aviation security service fees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Passenger Fee Re5 structuring Exemptions Act of 2014’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCEPTIONS TO RESTRUCTURING OF PASSENGER 

7 FEE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 44940(c) of title 49, 

9 United States Code, is amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3934 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘Fees imposed’’ and inserting 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided by 

4 paragraph (2), fees imposed’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTIONS.—Fees imposed under sub7 section (a)(1) may not exceed $2.50 per 

8 enplanement, and the total amount of such fees may 

9 not exceed $5.00 per one-way trip, for passengers— 

10 ‘‘(A) boarding to an eligible place under 

11 subchapter II of chapter 417 for which essential 

12 air service compensation is paid under that sub13 chapter; or 

14 ‘‘(B) on flights, including flight segments, 

15 between 2 or more points in Hawaii or 2 or 

16 more points in Alaska.’’. 

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 601(d) of 

18 the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 is amended in the mat19 ter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘, as modified 

20 by the amendments made by section 2 of the Passenger 

21 Fee Restructuring Exemptions Act of 2014’’ after ‘‘sub22 section (b)’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Develocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen B. Schneer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Stephen B. Schneer Stephen B. Schneer Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer October 17, 2008
In the Matter of: T.D.A., A.D.A., G.I.A.

No. COA16-95

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 16, 2016

DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.
# C_2008116EN.01000501.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 March 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-248/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Research and development - Rules for the deduction of costs incurred abroad)

(2008/C 116/08)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: R. Lyal and L. Escobar Guerrero, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. Muñoz Pérez, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Articles 43 EC, 48 EC and 49 EC and Articles 31 EEA and 36 EEA — Rules for deducting costs for research and development and technological innovation incurred abroad more rigorous than those applicable to costs incurred in Spain

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by maintaining in force rules for the deduction of costs relating to research and development and technological innovation which are less favourable in respect of costs incurred abroad than costs incurred in Spain — such rules deriving from Article 35 of the Law on corporation tax, as amended by Royal Legislative Decree 4/2004 of 5 March 2004 — the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 EC and 49 EC on freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, and the corresponding articles in the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992, namely Articles 31 and 36 of that Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by maintaining in force rules for the deduction of costs relating to research and development and technological innovation which are less favourable in respect of costs incurred abroad than costs incurred in Spain — such rules deriving from Article 35 of the Law on corporation tax, as amended by Royal Legislative Decree 4/2004 of 5 March 2004 — the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 EC and 49 EC on freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, and the corresponding articles in the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992, namely Articles 31 and 36 of that Agreement;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 29.7.2006.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a) Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Christa C. Leonard, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A ofWestaff, Inc. (the “registrant”);

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

Date:  November21, 2008

 

 
| /s/ Christa C. Leonard                             |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christa C. Leonard                                 |   |
| Westaff, Inc.                                 |   |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (Principal  Financial Officer)                     |   |

 

----
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133305 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133306 

Marilyn Kelly 133307 Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

JAMES TAYLOR, as Personal

Representative of the Estate of

Afradita Taylor, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 133305-133307 

 COA: 262763, 262771, 262777 

Oakland CC: 03-053470-NH 

RAMALINGESWARA YALAMANCHI,

M.D., R. R. YALAMANCHI, M.D., P.C.,

PANKAJ K. VIJ, M.D., DAVID M.

MONTGOMERY, M.D., MITUL K. PATEL, 

M.D., GRAHAM W. LONG, M.D., and

WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879) is pending on appeal 

before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the 

present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in 

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. 

l0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

July 7, 2014

 

By Hand
  Alan N. Forman

 

Re:   Amendment of Retention Bonus Letter Agreement

 

Dear Alan:

 

As you know, we have provided you with an opportunity to earn a retention bonus pursuant to that certain letter agreement dated July 18, 2013 (the “Existing Letter Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Existing Letter Agreement.

 

As we continue evaluating strategic alternatives, we are pleased to extend the Outside Date of your Existing Letter Agreement from June 30, 2014 to December 31, 2014.  As a result, you will be entitled to receive the Retention Bonus if a Closing occurs by December 31, 2014 so long as you remain employed by the Company on the date of Closing; provided however, in the event of a Covered Termination, you shall also be entitled to receive the Retention Bonus as if you were employed on such date.  But, please note that since none of the Quarterly Financial Targets were achieved, you are not due any Retention Bonus based upon the Company’s financial performance.

 

In addition, please note that the Existing Letter Agreement is hereby further amended so that you are not eligible for a Retention Bonus in the event that the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution.  Accordingly, the following words, “the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or” are hereby deleted from subsection (iv) of the definition of Change in Control.

 

Except as set forth above, the Existing Letter Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. We look forward to your continued employment with us.

 

	
 
    	
Very truly yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Robert S. Yorgensen
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name: Robert S. Yorgensen
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title: President and CEO
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Agreed to and accepted:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Alan N.   Forman 
    	
 
    
	
Alan N. Forman
In the Matter of: J.J.

No. COA16-281

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 18, 2016

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Micrel, Incorporated (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

   (i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 7, 2006              /s/   Raymond D. Zinn
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     Raymond D. Zinn
                                     Chief Executive Officer


                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Micrel, Incorporated (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

   (i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: November 7, 2006              /s/   Richard D. Crowley
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     Richard D. Crowley
                                     Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,378                  64,450
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       25                   2,153
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                     220
<INVENTORY>                                         43                     946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,819                  69,689
<PP&E>                                           3,084                  62,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                      70                   3,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,074                 139,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,022                  21,509
<BONDS>                                              0                 142,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         18                      18
<COMMON>                                            11                      12
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,469                (24,736)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,074                 139,419
<SALES>                                             26                   5,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    26                   5,326
<CGS>                                               54                   4,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       54                   4,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,739                  38,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12                  15,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,612)                (48,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,612)                (48,121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,612)                (48,121)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.80)                  (8.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)                  (8.43)
        

</TABLE>
km 

## NOV 18 2022 Bowen Greenwood C1,_,A of Supreme Court State of tVlontana IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

HELENA, MONTANA 59620-3003 Supreme CourtNo. DA 22-0497 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee, v. THOMAS RONALD KNUDSON,

Defendant and Appellant. GRANT OF EXTENSION

Pursuantto authority granted under M. R. App.P. 26(1), Appellant is given an extension oftime until December 19, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant'sbrief. DATED thisNovember 18, 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk ofthe Supreme Court

c: Thomas Ronald Knudson, Austin Miles Knudsen, Stephen A. Gannon

PO BOX 203003 • HELENA MT • 59620-3003• TELEPHONE: (406) 444-3858 • FAX: (406) 444-5705 11/18/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0497
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,867,629
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         280,817
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,716,140
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 76,804,462
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      22,006,195
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    163,464,538
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,772,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             283,913,435
<DEPOSITS>                                 226,337,379
<SHORT-TERM>                                13,577,689
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,761,688
<LONG-TERM>                                 20,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,514
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,218,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             283,913,435
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             14,558,024
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,081,126
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               738,016
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            20,377,166
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,212,112
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,835,888
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       10,541,278
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  246,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             107,111
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,156,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,693,231
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,637,824
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    1.43
<LOANS-NON>                                    466,605
<LOANS-PAST>                                   420,156
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                271,446
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,793,112
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  371,726
<RECOVERIES>                                   105,508
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,772,894
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,772,894
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
NIES v. TOWN OF EMERALD ISLE

409PA15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 26, 2016

J. David Breemer, Attorney at Law, Keith P. Anthony, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Nies, Gregory P., et al.

Brian E. Edes, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, Norwood P. Blanchard, III, Attorney at Law, for Town of Emerald Isle.

Elliot M. Engstrom, Attorney at Law, for Civitas Institute Center for Law and Freedom.

Stephanie H. Autry, Attorney at Law, George B. Autry, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Robert H. Thomas, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, for Owners' Counsel of America, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of May 2016 by Owners Counsel of America and Professor David L. Callies for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of May 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
STATE of North Carolina v. Jackson Cain WHISENANT

No. 380P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 15, 2016.

Mr. Aaron Young, Attorney at Law, For Whisenant, Jackson Cain.

Mr. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of October 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."