alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010301EN.01002401.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Spain v Commission

(Joined Cases T-156/07 and 232/07) (1)

1

(Rules on the use of languages - Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of administrators - Publication in all the official languages - Amendments - Regulation No 1 - Articles 27, 28 and Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations - Article 1(1) and (2) of Annex III to the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of non-discrimination)

2010/C 301/37

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: Case T-156/07, F. Díez Moreno and, Case T 232/07, F. Díez Moreno and N. Díaz Abad, abogados del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall, L. Escobar Guerrero and H. Krämer, and subsequently by J. Currall, H. Krämer and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas, Agent) (Cases T-156/07 and T-232/07); and Hellenic Republic (represented by: S. Vodina and M. Michelogiannaki, Agents) (Case T-156/07)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of the Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/94/07 to constitute a reserve pool of Administrators (AD 5) in the field of information, communication and media (OJ 2007 C 45 A, p. 3) and, second, of the Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/95/07 to constitute a reserve pool of Administrators (AD 5) in the field of information science (library/documentation) (OJ 2007 C 103 A, p. 7).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Lithuania and the Hellenic Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Lithuania and the Hellenic Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.

1

---
# CE2004088EN.01002202.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/22

---

(2004/C 88 E/0023)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1311/03

by Bill Newton Dunn (ELDR) to the Commission

(7 April 2003)

Subject:   The imprisonment of Dr Oscar Ellis Biscet by the Cuban authorities

Subject:

The Commission may be aware of the imprisonment of Dr Oscar Ellias Biscet, a Cuban human rights activist, by the Cuban authorities.

Has the Commission:

| 1. | Made representations to the Cuban Government about the imprisonment of Dr Oscar Ellias Biscet? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Made representations to the Cuban Government about the imprisonment of Dr Oscar Ellias Biscet?

| 2. | Other plans, to try to ensure that the Cuban authorities respect the human rights of their citizens? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Other plans, to try to ensure that the Cuban authorities respect the human rights of their citizens?

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Corporation for National and Community Service

The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community Service gives notice of the following meeting:

# Date and Time:

Wednesday, September 21, 2005, 9:30 a.m.-11:30 a.m.

# Place:

Wyndham Washington DC; Monticello West Room; 1400 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

# Status:

Open. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 

I. Chair's Opening Remarks 

II. Consideration of Prior Meeting's Minutes 

III. Committee Reports 

IV. CEO Report 

V. Public Comment 

# Accommodations:

Anyone who needs an interpreter or other accommodation should notify the Corporation's contact person by 5 p.m. Monday, September 19, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        David Premo, Public Affairs Associate, Public Affairs, Corporation for National and Community Service, 10th Floor, Room 10302E, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 606-6717. Fax (202) 606-3460. TDD: (202) 606-3472. E-mail:                         *dpremo@cns.gov.*

Dated: September 13, 2005. 

Frank R. Trinity, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 05-18494 Filed 9-13-05; 3:03 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
March, 2010

CONSENT OF ENGINEER



Reference is made to the Annual Information Form to be included in the Annual Report on Form 40-F (collectively, the 40-F) of Nevsun Resources Ltd. to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

AMEC Americas Limited hereby consents to the references to its name in the 40-F as having prepared the report titled Feasibility Study Report, Bisha Project, dated October 2006, and the use of the report in the 40-F.





On behalf of AMEC Americas Limited



Signed

____________________
Name: Kris Homer, P. Eng.
Title:    VP Operations, North America

AMEC





















---
# C_2008051EN.01003902.xml

| 23.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/39

---

Order of the President of the Court of 16 November 2007 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Zala Megyei Bíróság — Republic of Hungary) — OTP Bank rt and Merlin Gerin Zala kft v Zala Megyei Közigazgatási Hivatal

(Case C-195/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 51/68)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 9.6.2007.

1

---
# C_2011311EN.01003302.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Koninklijke Grolsch v Commission

(Case T-234/07) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Dutch beer market - Decision finding a single and continuous infringement of Article 81 EC - Applicant found to have participated in the infringement - Insufficient evidence - No proper statement of reasons)

2011/C 311/57

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Koninklijke Grolsch NV (Enschede, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Biesheuvel and J. de Pree, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, A. Bouquet, S. Noë and A. Nijenhuis, Agents, and, subsequently, A. Bouquet and S Noë, assisted by M. Slotboom, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 1697 of 18 April 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case No COMP/B-2/37.766 — Dutch beer market) in so far as it concerns the applicant and, in the alternative, application for annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2007) 1697 of 18 April 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case No COMP/B-2/37.766 –Dutch beer market) in so far as it concerns Koninklijke Grolsch NV; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2007) 1697 of 18 April 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case No COMP/B-2/37.766 –Dutch beer market) in so far as it concerns Koninklijke Grolsch NV;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---
# C_2009006EN.01004402.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/44

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 November 2008 — Pierre Bosman v Council of the European Union

(Case F-145/07) (1)

1

(Staff case - Former member of the contract staff - Retirement pension - Household allowance - Article 109(3) of the CEOS)

(2009/C 6/89)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Pierre Bosman (Lebbeke, Belgium) (represented by: T. Bontinck and P. Gennari Curlo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and I. Šulce, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the decision relating to an individual of 28 February 2007 refusing the household allowance for the purposes of the calculation of retirement pension rights, on the basis of Article 109(3) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Bosman to pay all the costs, that is to bear his own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Bosman to pay all the costs, that is to bear his own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008, p. 38.

1

---
In the Matter of: A.J.P.

No. COA16-473

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 1, 2016

AFFIRMED.
**Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2008 – SAFBA and Others v Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects
et Receveur principal des douanes et droits indirects de Gennevilliers**

**(Joined Cases C‐175/07 to C-184/07)**

Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure – Sugar – Production levies – Detailed rules for the application of the quota system – Taking into account of the quantities of sugar contained in processed products – Determination of the exportable surplus – Determination of the average loss

Agriculture – Common organisation of the markets – Sugar – Production levies (Council Regulation No 1260/2001, Art. 15(1)(b), (c) and (d); Commission Regulations No 314/2002, as amended
by Commission Regulation No 38/2004, Art. 6(4) and (5), and No 1686/2005) (see paras 20-24, 26-29, operative part 1-2)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Tribunal de grande instance de Nanterre – Validity, having regard to Article 15 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (OJ 2001 L 178, p. 1), and the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination, of Commission Regulation (EC) No 314/2002 of 20 February 2002 laying down detailed rules for the application of the quota system in the sugar sector (OJ 2002 L 50, p. 40) – Validity, having regard to Regulations (EC) No 1260/2001 and 314/2002, of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1686/2005 of 14 October 2005 setting the production levies and the coefficient for the additional levy in the sugar sector for the 2004/05 marketing year (OJ 2005 L 271, p. 12) – Production levies including quantities of sugar contained in processed products, exported without benefit of export refunds. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Examination of Article 6(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 314/2002 of 20 February 2002 laying down detailed rules for the application of the quota system in the sugar sector, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 38/2004 of 9 January 2004, in so far as that provision does not, with regard to calculation of the production levy, provide for exclusion from the exportable surplus of the quantities of sugar contained in exported processed products for which no export refund has been granted has not shown that there are factors liable to affect its validity. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1686/2005 of 14 October 2005 setting the production levies and the coefficient for the additional levy in the sugar sector for the 2004/05 marketing year is invalid. |
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

      We hereby    consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements    on Form S-3 (No. 333-121955, No. 333-114315, No. 333-111595, No.    333-105127,No. 333-102829, No. 333-64176, No. 333-67213, and No. 333-25987) andForm S-8  (No. 333-97719, No. 333-86817, No. 333-67223, No. 333-28403, No.333-26557, No. 333-20939, and No. 333-17209) ofViewpointCorporationofourreportdatedMarch16,2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedulewhichappears in this Form 10-K.

New York, New YorkMarch 16, 2005
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 1, 2015

No. 04-15-00125-CR

EX PARTE Hector RAMIREZ,

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2894-W1

The Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due July 20, 2015.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         145,034
<SECURITIES>                                    21,316
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,175
<INVENTORY>                                     15,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               248,388
<PP&E>                                          55,427
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,997
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       203,728
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28,313)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   304,108
<SALES>                                        337,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               337,012
<CGS>                                          151,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,986
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,895
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,339
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC. 
 NON-EMPLOYEE
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN 
 ADOPTED JUNE 24, 1999 

AS AMENDED JUNE 20, 2014 
 Cash Compensation: 

 

					
	 • Non-Employee Director Annual Retainer
	  	$	150,000	  
	 • Audit Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	  	$	25,000	  
	 • Compensation Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	  	$	25,000	  
	 • Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	  	$	10,000	  
	 • Non-Executive Chairman of the Board Annual Retainer
	  	$	125,000	  

 Non-Employee Director compensation is payable in equal monthly installments on the last business day of each fiscal month.

 Non-Employee Directors are eligible to participate in the following: 
  

	 	•	 	The Director Deferred Stock Unit Awards program set forth in the Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.  

  

	 	•	 	At the time a Non-Employee Director ceases to be a Director of the Company, any cash compensation which has been paid for the time period following the Director’s service shall be repaid in cash to the Company.
Also, the deferred stock units credited to such Director at that time shall be adjusted by the Company to remove from the credited amount (i) any portion of the deferred stock units applicable to the time period following the Director’s
service, plus (ii) provided that such Director has not repaid the Company for any cash compensation applicable to that time period, then at the discretion of the Company, an amount of deferred stock units equal to any such cash compensation
(such units to be valued as of the date the Director ceases to be a Director). 

  

	 	•	 	The amount of deferred stock units, as adjusted if applicable, will be exchanged for shares of the Company’s common stock on a unit-to-share basis. Provided, however, that the deferred stock units (valued as of the
date the Director ceases to be a Director) will be paid in cash to the extent that applicable plan limitations at such time preclude plan distributions of Pier 1 Imports, Inc. common stock. 


 

	 	•	 	The Pier 1 Imports, Inc. Stock Purchase Plan according to its terms and provisions. 

  

	 	•	 	The Pier 1 Imports, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan according to its terms and provisions.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-100-05-1310-DB] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (1976) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (1972), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Pinedale Anticline Working Group (PAWG) will meet in Pinedale, Wyoming, for a business meeting. Group meetings are open to the public. 

# DATES:

The PAWG will meet October 25, 2005, from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting of the PAWG will be held in the Lovatt room of the Pinedale Library, 155 S. Tyler Ave., Pinedale, WY. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mike Stiewig, BLM/PAWG Liaison, Bureau of Land Management, Pinedale Field Office, 432 E. Mills St., P.O. Box 738, Pinedale, WY 82941; (307) 367-5363. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Pinedale Anticline Working Group (PAWG) was authorized and established with release of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Pinedale Anticline Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Project on July 27, 2000. The PAWG advises the BLM on the development and implementation of monitoring plans and adaptive management decisions as development of the Pinedale Anticline Natural Gas Field proceeds for the life of the field. 

The agenda for this meeting will include discussions concerning any modifications task groups may wish to make to their monitoring recommendations, a discussion on monitoring funding sources, and overall adaptive management implementation as it applies to the PAWG. At a minimum, public comments will be heard prior to lunch and adjournment of the meeting. 

Dated: September 14, 2005. 

Priscilla Mecham, 

Field Office Manager. 

[FR Doc. 05-18877 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
Price v. Barlow, et al.

257P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

William Gerald Price, for Price, William Gerald.

Natasha M. Barone, Attorney at Law, Fayetteville, for Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of July 2016 by Respondent (Fannie Mae) for Sanctions:

*510"Motion Dismissed without prejudice by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7048

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHARD TOLAND FIELDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.

(7:07-cv-00492-gec-mfu; 5:04-cr-30018-gec-bwc-6)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 24, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Toland Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Ray Burton Fitzgerald,

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Toland Fields seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fields has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED