alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

          I,Kenneth Plotkin, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of HauppaugeDigital, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15-(e)) for the issuer and have:

          a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

          b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

          c)Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of theissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

          b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.
# C_2008301EN.01006405.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/64

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italian Republic v Commission

(Case T-298/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 301/123)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.

1

---
Dolores Marie Shope, Plaintiff, v. Richard Wayne Pennington, Defendant.

No. COA15-1249

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 6, 2016

AFFIRMED.
# C_2008064EN.01003501.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/35

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 January 2008 — Dorel Juvenile Group v OHIM (SAFETY 1ST)

(Case T-88/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark SAFETY 1ST - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 64/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. (Canton, United States of America) (represented by: G. Simon, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 January 2006 (Case R 616/2004-2) relating to an application for registration of the word mark SAFETY 1ST as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-957-05-1910-BJ-5RK4]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is scheduled to file the 
plats of surveys of the lands described below thirty (30) calendar days 
from the date of this publication in the BLM Wyoming State Office, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These surveys were executed at the request 
of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and are necessary for the managements 
of lands. The lands surveyed are:
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines and the subdivision of section 10, 
and the survey of the subdivision of section 10, and the metes and 
bounds survey of certain parcels, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Wind 
River Meridian, Wyoming, was accepted January 25, 2005.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the First Standard Parallel North, through Range 4 West, a 
portion of the subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of section 3, 
Township 4 North, Range 4 West, Wind River Meridian, Wyoming, was 
accepted January 25, 2005.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines, and the survey of the subdivision 
of section 15, and the metes and bounds survey of Parcel A, section 15, 
Township 4 North, Range 4 West, Wind River Meridian, Wyoming, was 
accepted January 25, 2005.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the First Standard Parallel North, through Range 4 West, and 
a portion of the subdivisional lines, and the survey of the subdivision 
of section 31, and the metes and bounds survey of Parcel A, section 31 
Township 5 North, Range 4 East, Wind River Meridian, Wyoming, was 
accepted January 25, 2005.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines, Township 5 North, Range 4 West, 
Wind River Meridian, Wyoming, was accepted January 25, 2005.
    Copies of the preceding described plats and field notes are 
available to the public at $1.10 each.

    Dated: January 26, 2005.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.
[FR Doc. 05-1902 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4467-22-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00194-CV

State Farm Lloyds as Subrogee of Nils Boyer and Susana Boyer, Appellant

v.

Deere & Company; JD Equipment, Inc.; M4 Equipment Company, Ltd.;

Fairfield AG & Turf, Ltd.; and The Brown Tractor and Implement Company, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2007-0467A, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant State Farm Lloyds has filed a motion requesting this Court to dismiss

the instant appeal. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(1) this Court grants

appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 26, 2008
# C_2009044EN.01004501.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/45

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 December 2008 — Torres v OHIM — Sociedad Cooperativa del Campo San Ginés (TORRE DE BENÍTEZ)

(Case T-16/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark TORRE DE BENÍTEZ - Earlier national, Community and international word and figurative marks evoking a number of towers - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion)

(2009/C 44/77)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Miguel Torres, SA (Vilafranca del Penedés, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, M. Baz de San Ceferino and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Sociedad Cooperativa del Campo San Ginés (Cuenca, Spain) (represented by: C. Hernández Hernández, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 November 2006 (Case R-36/2006-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Miguel Torres, SA and Sociedad Cooperativa del Campo San Ginés.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Miguel Torres, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Miguel Torres, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 14.4.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Ronald W. Bachli hereby certifies as follows:



| | 1. | He is the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer of Placer Sierra Bancshares, a California corporation (the Company).
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 9th day of May 2006.



Dated: May 9, 2006



| |  |                                         
| |  | ----------------------------------------
| |  | PLACER SIERRA BANCSHARES                
| | 
| |  | /s/ Ronald W. Bachli                    
| |  | Ronald W. Bachli Chief Executive
Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned officers of Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully
complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 14, 2008 |                                               
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------
|                      |                                               
|                      | /s/ Ronald K. Mann                            
|                      | Ronald K. Mann                                
|                      | (Chief Executive                              
|                      | Officer of Yukon Gold                         
|                      | Corporation, Inc.)                            
|                      |                                               
|                      |                                               
|Dated: March 14, 2008 |                                               
|                      |                                               
|                      | /s/Rakesh Malhotra                            
|                      | Rakesh Malhotra, C.A., Chief Financial Officer
|                      | (Chief Financial Officer of                   
|                      | Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc.)                 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. and will be
retained by Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
State of North Carolina v. Peggy Marie Marshall

No. COA16-22

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 1, 2016

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SouthCrest
Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “ Periodic Report”),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his individual
knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      August 14, 2008/s/LarryT.KuglarLarry T. KuglarChief
      Executive Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3876 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to carry out a grant program to provide burials for homeless veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2014 

Mr. AL GREEN of Texas (for himself and Ms. BROWN of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a grant program 

to provide burials for homeless veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burial with Dignity 

5 for Heroes Act of 2014’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3876 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS GRANT PRO2 GRAM TO PROVIDE BURIALS FOR HOMELESS 

3 VETERANS. 

4 (a) GRANT PROGRAM.—Subchapter VII of chapter 

5 20 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 2067. Grant program to provide burials for home8 less veterans 

9 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall carry 

10 out a program to make grants to eligible entities to pro11 vide for the cost of burials for homeless veterans who— 

12 ‘‘(1) are eligible to be buried in national ceme13 teries under section 2402 of this title; and 

14 ‘‘(2) the Secretary determines have no next-of15 kin. 

16 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—To be eligible to receive 

17 a grant under this section, an entity shall submit to the 

18 Secretary an application containing such information and 

19 assurances as the Secretary determines appropriate.’’. 

20 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

21 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

22 at the end of the items relating to such subchapter the 

23 following new item: 

‘‘2067. Grant program to provide burials for homeless veterans.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Donald HALE, Employee, Plaintiff, v. BARNES DISTRIBUTION, Employer, and Indemnity Company of North America (Tristar Risk Management, Third Party Administrator), Carrier, Defendants.

No. COA 16-26.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Aug. 2, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
ORDER OF THE COURT (Seventh Chamber)

25 October 2007

Case C-495/06 P

**Bart Nijs**

**v**

**Court of Auditors of the European Communities**

(Appeals – Promotion – 2003 promotion procedure – Staff report – Decision establishing the definitive version of the report – Decision to promote another official to the grade of Translator-reviser – Claim for compensation for damage – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

**Appeal:**brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 3 October 2006 in Case T-171/05 *Nijs* v *Court of Auditors* ECR-SC I-A-2-195 and II-A-2-999 in which the Court of First Instance dismissed – in so far as it relied on grounds other
than a failure to give reasons – the action seeking, first, annulment of the decision establishing the definitive version
of the appellant’s staff report for the 2003 reporting period, the decision allocating the appellant merit points for the
2003 reporting period and the decision not to promote him in 2004, and of the decision rejecting the complaint brought against
those decisions and, secondly, an application for compensation in respect of the harm suffered.

**Held:**The appeal is dismissed. Mr Nijs is ordered to pay the costs.

**Summary**

1.        *Appeals – Grounds – Mistaken assessment of the facts – Inadmissibility –Review by the Court of Justice of the assessment of
the evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted*

*(Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)*

2.        *Appeals – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the Court of First Instance – Inadmissible*

*(Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c))*
CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
INN OF THE MOUNTAIN GODS RESORT AND CASINO
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principals;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Daniel McCueBy:
    
    Daniel McCueTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
CITY OF ASHEVILLE v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 391PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

I. Faison Hicks, Special Deputy Attorney General.

Robert W. Oast, Jr., City Attorney, for City of Asheville.

Daniel G. Clodfelter, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for City of Asheville.

T. Randolph Perkins, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for City of Asheville.

Jonathan M. Watkins, Charlotte, Attorney at Law.

Jason G. Idilbi, Charlotte, Attorney at Law.

Robert B. Long, Jr., Asheville, Attorney at Law, for City of Asheville.

Ronald K. Payne, Asheville, Attorney at Law.

Isham F. Hicks, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Robin T. Currin, City of Ashville Attorney, for City of Asheville.

*796William Clarke, Asheville, Attorney at Law, for State of North Carolina.

Stephen W. Petersen, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for State of North Carolina.

Robert F. Orr, Asheville, Attorney at Law, for City of Asheville.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for City of Asheville.

Allegra Collins, Attorney at Law, for International Municipal Lawyers Association.

Edward J. Coyne, III, Greenville, Attorney at Law, for Brunswick Regional Water & Sewer H2GO.

Jeremy M. Wilson, Wilmington, Attorney at Law, for Brunswick Regional Water & Sewer H2GO.

Gabriel Du Sablon, Attorney at Law, for City of Wilson.

James P. Cauley, III, Wilson, Attorney at Law, for City of Wilson.

Gregory F. Schwitzgebel, III, Associate General Counsel, for North Carolina League of Municipalities.

Kimberly S. Hibbard, General Counsel, for North Carolina League of Municipalities.

The following order has been entered on the conditional motion filed on the 4th of December 2015 by City of Wilson for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).