alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group, Function, Integration, and 
Rehabilitation Sciences Subcommittee.
    Date: October 10-11, 2005.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Anne Krey, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6908, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcddd7888dd3fcd2d5d492dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="debfb5eaefb19eb0b7b6f0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18868 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140--1-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE of North Carolina v. Marvin Hakeem JOHNSON

No. 383P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 15, 2016.

Mr. Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. Staples Hughes.

Ms. Michele Goldman, Attorney at Law, For Johnson, Marvin Hakeem.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of October 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 21, 2005 / Presidential Documents 55511 

Proclamation 7934 of September 16, 2005 

Family Day, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Families are a source of hope, stability, and love. On Family Day, we 

celebrate the special bonds that link children and parents, and we recognize 

the importance of parental involvement in the lives of their children. By 

providing guidance, support, and unconditional love, families help shape 

the character and future of our Nation. 

In a free and compassionate society, the public good depends upon the 

private character of our citizens. That character is formed and shaped from 

a child’s earliest days through the love and guidance of family. Families 

help children understand the difference between right and wrong and the 

importance of making good choices. Regular family activities allow parents 

to be actively involved in the lives of their children and instill important 

values of honesty, compassion, and respect for others. By raising young 

people in a loving and secure environment, parents help them develop 

into successful adults and responsible citizens. 

Parents and family are a bedrock of love and support, and my Administration 

is committed to strengthening families. My 2006 budget proposes $240 million for initiatives that promote responsible fatherhood and encourage healthy 

marriages. Through competitive grants to State-based programs and faithbased and community organizations, we are helping support their good 

work. As parents continue to raise healthy children, we can all help young 

people realize a bright and promising future. 

Strong families are the cornerstone of a strong America, and the wellbeing of families is a shared priority for all Americans. As we support 

families, we help build a Nation of opportunity and hope. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 26, 2005, 

as Family Day. I call on the people of the United States to observe this 

day by spending time with family members and reaffirming the important 

relationship between parents and children and the vital role that families 

play in our society. 

55512 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 21, 2005 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixteenth day 

of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–18978 

Filed 9–20–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
Exhibit 10.7(e)








FOURTH AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT





THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT (this "Amendment") is made as of the 8th day of May, 2014 to that certain CONSULTING AGREEMENT, dated as of September 9, 2008, as amended (the "Consulting Agreement"), by JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (the "Client") and ROBERT N. WILDRICK ("Consultant").


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Client and Consultant, being the sole parties to the Consulting Agreement, hereby amend the  Consulting Agreement by restating Section 6.3(b) in its entirety, as follows:


(b)  In the event that, within ninety days following a change of control (which, for the avoidance of doubt, must qualify as change in the ownership or effective control of Client for purposes of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended), either (i) Consultant terminates this Agreement or (ii) Client terminates this Agreement, then Client shall immediately pay to Consultant the balance of the consulting fee for remainder of the term which would have constituted the  Consulting Period absent such termination.


Except as specifically amended hereby, the Consulting Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms.  To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of the remainder of the Consulting Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control and prevail.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respective meanings attributed to them in the Consulting Agreement.  This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed a part of the Consulting Agreement for all purposes.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.





CLIENT:                            CONSULTANT:





JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC.








By: /s/: Charles D. Frazer  /s/: ROBERT N. WILDRICK


Charles D. Frazer,                     ROBERT N. WILDRICK


Senior Vice President-General Counsel
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30604

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEVI MELONE, also known as Bubba Chicken

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CR-355-7

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Levi Melone appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for

conspiracy to distribute and possess with the intent to distribute five kilograms

or more of cocaine hydrochloride and 50 grams or more of cocaine base and use

of a communication facility in a drug trafficking offense. Melone argues that the

district court erred by applying 21 U.S.C. § 851(e) to hold that his denial of a

prior conviction was time barred. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 25, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 05-30604

2

The evidence before the district court established the fact of Melone’s prior

conviction. Melone offered no argument or evidence before the district court, nor

has he offered any before this court, that calls into question his identity as the

offender named in the prior conviction. Accordingly, he has not shown error in

the application of the enhancement, and his conviction is affirmed. See United

States v. Majors, 328 F.3d 791, 796-97 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Garcia,

954 F.2d 273, 277-78 (5th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                         70218
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         13113
<DEPRECIATION>                                 8284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 75656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11431
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1926868
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1862643)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   75656
<SALES>                                        9970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9970
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               56187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (46217)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (46217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (46217)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a) Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Michael T. Willis, certify that:

 

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Westaff, Inc. (the “registrant”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

Date:  November21, 2008

 

 
|  /s/  Michael T. Willis           |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael T. Willis                      |   |
| Westaff, Inc.                     |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |   |

 

----
# C_2009312EN.01000202.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 October 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-536/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Public works contracts - Directive 93/37/EEC - Contract between a public body and a private undertaking for the lease to the former of exhibition halls to be built by the latter - Private undertaking to be paid by means of a monthly rent for a period of 30 years)

2009/C 312/03

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Kukovec and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and J. Möller, acting as Agents, and by H.-J. Prieß, Rechtsanwalt)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 7 in conjunction with Article 11 of Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p. 54) — Failure to organise an open procedure for award of a contract before the conclusion of a contract between the City of Cologne and a private investment firm concerning the rent by the city, for a fixed period of 30 years in consideration for a total rent of more than EUR 600 million, of four exhibition halls to be constructed by that private firm in accordance with detailed contract documents

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 7(4) and 11 of Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts by reason of the fact that the City of Cologne concluded the contract of 6 August 2004 with Grundstücksgesellschaft Köln Messe 15 bis 18 GbR, now Grundstücksgesellschaft Köln Messe 8-11 GbR, without applying the procedure for the award of public contracts laid down by those provisions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 7(4) and 11 of Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts by reason of the fact that the City of Cologne concluded the contract of 6 August 2004 with Grundstücksgesellschaft Köln Messe 15 bis 18 GbR, now Grundstücksgesellschaft Köln Messe 8-11 GbR, without applying the procedure for the award of public contracts laid down by those provisions;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 23.2.2008.

1

---
STATE v. CASEY.

No. COA08-183.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Randolph (06CRS50128, 06CRS50667, 06CRS50668).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00469

- CR

Ricky D. Davis

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 2

o f Tarrant County (1295152D )

February 26, 2015

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRI CT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1330

MICHAEL L. PACK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

G. MICHAEL JOHN, Attorney,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:08-cv-00399-RDB)

Submitted: August 22, 2008 Decided: September 12, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Pack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Pack appeals a district court order summarily

dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the order

and the district court record and dismiss the appeal as frivolous

on the reasoning of the district court. See Pack v. John, No.

1:08-cv-00399-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2008). 

Based on Pack’s history of filing frivolous cases in the

district court and frivolous appeals in this court, we ordered Pack

to show cause why he should not be enjoined from filing appeals in

this court without first receiving certification from the district

court that the appeal is not frivolous. Pack filed a response

claiming his cases are not frivolous. After reviewing his response

and Pack’s cases, we disagree. As the district court noted, Pack

has filed about eighty cases in the district court since 1995, the

majority of which were summarily dismissed. Pack has also filed

frivolous appeals in this court. Given his disregard for the

limited resources of this court, we enjoin Pack from filing appeals

in this court without first receiving certification from the

district court that the appeal is not frivolous. Any appeal in a

civil case Pack presents to this court without district court

certification will not be filed. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
3

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Philip PARKER, Plaintiff v. ARCARO DRIVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Defendant.

No. COA15-928.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Aug. 2, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reversed and Remanded.
Exhibit 32.2
  
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CPI International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 27, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Joel A. Littman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
   /s/
      JOEL A. LITTMANJoel
      A. LittmanChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      6, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3839 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3839

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a grant program 
    to assist the repair and replacement of bridges, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2014

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a grant program 
    to assist the repair and replacement of bridges, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Building and Repairing 
Infrastructure with Domestic Gains in Employment Act of 2013'' or the 
``BRIDGE Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. BRIDGE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT GRANT PROGRAM.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Transportation is authorized 
to make a grant, on a competitive basis, to a State to assist a project 
to repair or replace a bridge.
    (b) Criteria for Grant Awards.--In making a grant under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall give preference to a proposed project that, as 
determined by the Secretary--
            (1) addresses a bridge with a demonstrated significant need 
        for repair or replacement; and
            (2) creates a significant number of jobs.
    (c) Applications.--To be eligible for a grant under subsection (a), 
a State shall submit to the Secretary an application in such form, at 
such time, and containing such information as the Secretary determines 
appropriate, which shall include--
            (1) an identification of the bridge to be repaired or 
        replaced;
            (2) a description of the activities to be undertaken with 
        grant funds;
            (3) an analysis of the need for the activities described in 
        paragraph (2); and
            (4) an analysis of the number of jobs to be created as a 
        result of the grant.
    (d) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of a project 
assisted with a grant made under subsection (a) may not exceed 80 
percent.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $50,000,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136744 & (51)(55) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136744 

 COA: 272181 

Kent CC: 05-011444-FC 

JIMMY LEE HOLLINS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the April 29, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for discovery is DENIED. 

0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk