alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008064EN.01003502.xml

| 8.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/35

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 31 January 2008 — Federación de Cooperativas Agrarias de la Comunidad Valenciana v CPVO

(Case T-95/06) (1)

1

(Plant varieties - Appeal to the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office - Inadmissibility - Lack of individual concern - Effective judicial protection - Obligation to state reasons)

(2008/C 64/56)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Federación de Cooperativas Agrarias de la Comunidad Valenciana (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: S. Roig Girbes, R. Ortega Bueno and M. Delgado Echevarría, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by: M. Ekvad, acting as Agent, assisted by D. O'Keefe, Solicitor, J. Rivas de Andrés and M. Canal Fontcuberta, lawyers)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of CPVO intervening before the Court of First Instance: Nador Cott Protection SARL (Saint-Raphaël, France) (represented by: M. Fernández Mateos, S. González Malabia and M. Marín Bataller, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of CPVO intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of CPVO of 8 November 2005 (Case A 001/2005) concerning the grant of a Community plant variety right in regard to the mandarin variety Nadorcott.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Federación de Cooperativas Agrarias de la Comunidad Valenciana to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federación de Cooperativas Agrarias de la Comunidad Valenciana to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.

1

---
State v. Nashid Porter

153P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 23, 2016

Nashid Porter, For Porter, Nashid

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ben R. David, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of April 2016 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd of May 2016."
LOGO

EXHIBIT 99.21

CONSENT OF LUKE EVANS

In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibits thereto, of Goldcorp Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the Annual Report), I, Luke
Evans, consent to (i) the use of and reference to the technical report dated March 27, 2014, entitled Technical Report on the Pueblo Viejo Project, Sanchez Ramirez Province, Dominican Republic (the Technical Report), or
portions thereof, that was prepared by me, that I supervised the preparation of and/or was reviewed and approved by me, (ii) the use of and references to my name, including as an expert or qualified person, in connection with the Annual
Report and the Technical Report, and (iii) the information derived or summarized from the Technical Report that is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibits thereto into Registration Statement
Nos. 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251,
333-174376, 333-181116, 333-188805, 333-195816 and
333-213153 on Form S-8, No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company.

Dated this 16th day of March, 2017



|       |  |                              
|------ |  | -----------------------------
|       |  | (Signed)LukeEvans          
|Name:  |  | Luke Evans, M.Sc., P.Eng.    
|Title: |  | Principal Geologist          
|       |  | Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.





RPA Inc. 55 University Ave. Suite 501 | Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 | T +1 (416) 947
0907 www.rpacan.com
State v. Charles Everette Hinton

449P11-13

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Charles E. Hinton, Pro Se.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of February 2016 by Petitioner for Evidentiary Oral Hearing and Findings and Conclusions by the Court:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
PC Service Source, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(nos. 333-09333, 333-09335, 33-81146 and 33-98176) on Form S-8 of PC Service
Source, Inc. of our report dated February 13, 1998 relating to the consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows, before the
reclassification described in Note 1(n) and the inclusion of the segment
information in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, and the related
financial statement schedule of PC Service Source, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
year ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of PC Service Source, Inc.


                                                     /s/ KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 30, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18809]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical Information Services 
Data Link

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical Information 
Services Data Link.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 11-14, 2005 from 9 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., Colson Board Room, 
1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036-5133.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463. 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 206 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
    <bullet> October 11:
    <bullet> Opening Session (Welcome, Introductory and Administrative 
Remarks, Review Agenda, Announcement of Sub Chairs, Review Terms of 
Reference).
    <bullet> Discussion.
    <bullet> Presentations.
    <bullet> Doug Arbuckle: 3-3:15 p.m. The JPDO's 2025 Concept for the 
Next Generation Air Transportation System.
    <bullet> Ernie Dash: Cockpit Use of NEXRAD; Base Reflectivity vs. 
Composite Reflective.
    <bullet> David Helms: World Meteorological Organization's AMDAR 
Program.
    <bullet> Others--as approved.
    <bullet> Break Out:
    <bullet> Subgroup 1--Weather Data Link.
    <bullet> Subgroup 2--NOTAMs and AIS Data Link.
    <bullet> Re-convene Plenary, as determined by the Leadership.
    <bullet> October 12-13:
    <bullet> Subgroup 1 and 2 meetings.
    <bullet> October 14:
    <bullet> Subgroup 1 and 2 meetings.
    <bullet> Re-convene Plenary, Subgroup Report outs:
    <bullet> Subgroup 1--Weather Data Link.
    <bullet> Subgroup 2--NOTAMs and AIS Data Link.
    <bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Data and Place of Next 
Meeting, Closing Remarks, Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 14, 2005.
Natalie Ogletree,
FAA General Engineer, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 05-18809 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
**Exhibit
      21.1**




List
      of
      Subsidiaries of Berry Plastics Corporation


Berry
      Iowa Corporation (DE)


Packerware
      Corporation (DE)


Knight
      Plastics, Inc. (DE)


Berry
      Sterling Corporation (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Design Corporation (DE)


Poly-Seal
      Corporation (DE)


Venture
      Packaging, Inc. (DE)


Venture
      Packaging Midwest, Inc. (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Technical Services, Inc. (DE)


CPI
      Holding Corporation (DE)


Cardinal
      Packaging, Inc. (OH)


AeroCon,
      Inc. (DE)


Pescor,
      Inc. (DE)


Landis
      Plastics, Inc. (IL)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation II (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation III (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation V (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation VII (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation VIII (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation IX (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation X (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation XI (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation XII (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation XIII (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation XIV, LLC (DE)


Berry
      Plastics Acquisition Corporation XV, LLC (DE)


NIM
      Holdings Limited (E&W)


Berry
      Plastics U.K. Limited (E&W)


Norwich
      Acquisition Limited (E&W)


Capsol
      Berry Plastics S.p.A. (Italy)


Ociesse
      S.r.l. (Italy)


Berry
      Plastics Asia Pte. Ltd (Singapore)


Kerr
      Group, Inc. (DE)


Saffron
      Acquisition Corporation


Sun
      Coast
      Industries, Inc.


Setco,
      LLC


Tubed
      Products, LLC


Berry
      Plastics de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)


Grupo
      Servicios Berpla, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)
STATE of North Carolina v. Grant Hamilton WILLIAMS.

No. COA15-1212.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 17, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Plain Error in Part; No Error in Part.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40756 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NAUN MARTINEZ-FIGUEROA, also known as Nahum Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-993-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Naun Martinez-Figueroa pleaded guilty to being found in the United States after previous deportation and was sentenced to 37 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Martinez-Figueroa argues that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. Specifically, he argues that the viability of Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), is in doubt in light of later Supreme Court cases.No. 05-40756 -2- Martinez-Figueroa’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres . Although Martinez-Figueroa contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). MartinezFigueroa properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 99.31****CONSENT OF B. T. HENNESSEY**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following documents, which arebeing filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission: 1. The technical report dated January 2003 entitled “Technical Report on Mining &Processing Assets of Peak Gold Mines, in New South Wales, Australia & Minera AlumbreraLimited in Argentina” (the “Alumbrera Report”); and  2. The annual information form of the Company dated March 25, 2008, which includesreference to my name in connection with information relating to the Alumbrera Report,and the properties described therein.Date: March 28, 2008         /s/ B. Terrence Hennessey   Name:  B. Terrence Hennessey, P. Geo.   Title:  Vice President
BLANKENSHIP v. BARTLETT.

No. 455PA06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2008.

Donald G. Hunt, Jr., Jamie L. Vavonese, Fuquay-Varina, Amie C. Sivon, for Blankenship, et al.

*22Susan K. Nichols, Karen E. Long, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of December 2008 by Defendants

"Motion Allowed. Defendants shall have up to and including the 23rd day of January 2009 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of December 2008."
# C_2008285EN.01001102.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/11

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 July 2008 — (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Landau/Isar (Germany)) — Criminal proceedings against Rainer Günther Möginger

(Case C-225/07) (1)

1

(First paragraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 91/439/EEC - Mutual recognition of driving licences - Withdrawal of driving licence - Temporary ban on obtaining a new right to drive - Validity of a permit obtained in another Member State during the period of the ban)

(2008/C 285/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Landau/Isar (Germany)

Criminal proceedings against

Rainer Günther Möginger

Action

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Amtsgericht Landau/Isar — Interpretation of Article 8(2) and (4) of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences (OJ 1991 L 237, p. 1) — Non-recognition by the Member State of residence, on its territory, of a driving licence obtained in another Member State during the period of a temporary ban on applying for a new licence in the Member State of residence

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 1(2) and 8(2) and (4) of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 September 2003, must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude a Member State from refusing to recognise the validity of a driving licence issued by another Member State where the holder of that licence was, on the date the licence was issued, subject to a temporary ban on obtaining a new right to drive in the first Member State. In this respect, the fact that the question of validity arises after the date that marked the end of the period of the ban is irrelevant.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 4.8.2007

1

---
MOUNTAIN VILLAGES, LLC, Melba Richards, Manager and Lori Richards, Owner v. Zara Ellis SADLER.

No. 204P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Zara Ellis Sadler, for Sadler, Zara Ellis.

Mountain Villages, for Mountain Villages, LLC.

Lori Richards, for Mountain Villages, LLC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd of June 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd of June 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th of July 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th of July 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Jackson County District Court, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# C_2009282EN.01003902.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/39

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 October 2009 — MABB v Commission

(Case T-24/06) (1)

1

(State aid - Digital terrestrial television - Aid granted by the German authorities to broadcasters which use the digital terrestrial television network (DVB-T) in Berlin-Brandenburg - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Action for annulment - Not of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 282/73

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Medienanstalt Berlin-Brandenburg (MABB) (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: initially by M. Schütte, lawyer, and B. Immenkamp, Solicitor, then by M. Schütte)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. van Vliet and K. Gross, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Deutscher Kabelverband eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: K. Struckmann, C Arhold and N. Wimmer, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/513/EC of 9 November 2005 on the State Aid which the Federal Republic of Germany has implemented for the introduction of digital terrestrial television (DVB-T) in Berlin-Brandenburg (OJ 2006 L 200, p. 14).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders Medienanstalt Berlin-Brandenburg (MABB) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Medienanstalt Berlin-Brandenburg (MABB) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, of 8.4.2006.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3852 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3852

  To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq 
                          Resolution of 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2014

  Ms. Lee of California (for herself, Ms. Speier, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. 
McDermott, Mr. Nadler, and Mr. Ellison) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq 
                          Resolution of 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST 
              IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002.

    The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 
of 2002 (Public Law 107-243; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit 10.35

    


    


    Loan Agreement

    (English
Translation)

    


    
      	
              Lender (Party
      A):

            	
              Changchun Yongxin Dirui Medical
      Co., Ltd.

            


    

    


    
      	
              Borrower (Party
      B):

            	
              Changchun Golden Century
      Commodities Concrete Construction Company
  Limited

            


    

    


    The lender (Party A) and borrower (Party B) are entering into this loan agreement
providing for a loan from Party A to Party B on the following terms which have
been reached through negotiation:

    


    (1)           Principal Amount:  Party B will borrow RMB 6,000,000 from Party A.  

    


    (2)           Term: The term of the loan shall be
5 months, commencing from the day following
funding of the loan by Party A, from June 30, 2010 to November 30,
2010.  Within the term, interest will be charged on the
principal amount borrowed based on the applicable bank short-term interest rate of
4.86%.  Interest will be due and payable together with the principal amount, on the maturity date of November 30, 2010.

    


    (3)           Guarantee:  Party B must repay the principal and accrued interest under the loan to Party A on the due date.
 Penalty interest shall accrue to Party A if repayment is not made on or before the
above agreed maturity date.

    


    (4)           Penalty interest:  if (Party
B) fails to repay the loan when due, the interest shall accrue thereafter at an
annual rate which is double the original interest rate
above.  

    


    (5)          
Additional
Obligations:   If Party B fails to repay the loan to Party A when due, Party A shall have the right to collect, and enforce any of its other
legal rights as a creditor, under applicable PRC law.

    


    (6)         
 For any matters relating to this
agreement that are not
contained in this agreement, Party A and Party B agree to execute one or more further supplementary agreements after a negotiation between
the parties.

    


    (7)           Upon execution by both parties, each
supplementary agreement shall have the same legal force and effect as this agreement.

    


    (8)           This agreement is executed in two
counterparts, and each of Party A and Party B will keep
one copy.

    


    


    


    
      	
              Party A:

            	
              Changchun Yongxin Dirui Medical
      Co., Ltd.   [Corporate
  Seal]

            


    

    


    
      	
              Party B:

            	
              Changchun Golden Century
      Commodities Concrete Construction Company Limited [Corporate
      Seal]

            


    

     

     

    Dated:  June 30, 2010
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 08-0544

IN RE  SCOGGINS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s motion for emergency stay, filed August 12, 2008, is granted.   All trial court proceedings in Cause No. C-1473-06-I-1, styled *Mercedes Independent School District (Re:  Kennedy Elementary) v. Scoggins Construction Company, Inc.*, in the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this August 29, 2008.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk