alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Certification for Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Ohio State Bancshares, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  [This paragraph intentionally left blank.]
   5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: April 11, 2007
    /s/
    TODD WANNERTodd M. Wanner, CFA, CPAChief Financial Officer
Wallace Priester, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

April 27, 2016

ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on April 15, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4, **493IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable J. Mark Hayes, II be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Hayes shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Hayes shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Quintiles Transnational Corp. of our report dated January 26, 1998
included in the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of Quintiles Transnational
Corp.

         We also consent to the incorporation by reference into the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-91026, 333-16553,
333-03603 and 333-40493) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(Nos. 333-19009, 333-28919, 333-38181, 333-40497 and 333-48403) of
our report dated January 26, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Quintiles Transnational Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                                     /s/  Ernst & Young LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 27, 1998
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-1459

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Adam Brent Branton lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________ Submitted: September 9, 2021 Filed: September 30, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Adam Branton appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses. His counsel has moved for leave to

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

challenging the sentence. Branton has moved for appointment of new counsel. Upon careful review, we affirm. We do not decide whether the district court properly found Branton to be a career offender, as his career offender status did not affect the Guidelines calculations, and thus any error was harmless. See United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 928, 939 (8th Cir. 2013) (error in Guidelines calculation was harmless where offense level would have remained the same). We conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence, as the court properly considered the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and did not err in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (sentences are reviewed for substantive reasonableness under deferential abuse of discretion standard; abuse of discretion occurs when court fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors). Further, the court imposed a sentence below the Guidelines range. See United States v. McCauley, 715 F.3d 1119, 1127 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting that when district court has varied below Guidelines range, it is “nearly inconceivable” that court abused its discretion in not varying downward further). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and deny Branton’s motion for counsel.

______________________________

-2-
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.24




                              September 27, 1996


Mr. John D. Curtis
4337 Livingston
Dallas, Texas 75205

     Re:   Consulting Agreement

Dear John:

     This confirms your agreement to provide legal and business consulting
services and advice to Jayhawk Acceptance Corporation beyond the service and
advice that might be anticipated from your duties as a director. You will make
available adequate time to perform such services to the satisfaction of Jayhawk.
You will be responsible for providing your own office space, equipment and
secretarial support.

     To encourage you to devote such time and attention as reasonably may be 
required by Jayhawk, Jayhawk will grant to you, under the terms of its 1994
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, an option to purchase 20,000 shares of
the common stock of Jayhawk. The option will become exercisable in increments of
5,000 shares, with the first 5,000 shares being immediately exercisable on the
date of grant and each subsequent increment of 5,000 shares becoming exercisable
on each of the next three anniversaries of such date. If either you or Jayhawk
terminate this Consulting Agreement for any reason, then the option will
automatically terminate as to any shares which have not become exercisable as of
the effective date of termination. You understand and agree that Jayhawk's
obligation to grant such option to you is contingent upon the approval of the
Compensation Committee of Jayhawk's Board of Directors. Jayhawk will seek such
approval on or before the next scheduled meeting of the Compensation Committee.

     You agree to treat as confidential all confidential, proprietary and trade 
secret information of Jayhawk to which you may be exposed in providing services 
to Jayhawk. Either you or Jayhawk may terminate this Consulting Agreement at any
time upon 30 days advance written notice to the other party.

     If you are in agreement with the terms of this Agreement, then so indicate 
by signing this Consulting Agreement in the space provided below.

                                        Sincerely,

                                        Jayhawk Acceptance Corporation


                                        By: /s/ Mike Smartt
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Mike Smartt, Chairman of the Board
                                           and Chief Executive Officer
Accepted and Agreed:


/s/ John D. Curtis
------------------------------------
John D. Curtis
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Develocap, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen B. Schneer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Stephen B. Schneer Stephen B. Schneer Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer December 13, 2007
_________________________________________ 

 

________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly Rehearing 547 Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

2 January 2008 Justices 

132792 

AMYRUTH L. COOPER, by her Next Friend,

SHARON L. STROZEWSKI, and LORALEE

A. COOPER, by her Next Friend, SHARON L. 

STROZEWSKI,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

 SC: 132792 

v COA: 261736 

Washtenaw CC: 03-000367-NF 

AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing is considered and, in 

lieu of granting rehearing, the opinion of the Court is amended by striking on 

pages 401 and 417 the language “Therefore, we reverse in part the judgment of the 

Court of Appeals and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings 

consistent with this decision,” and substituting in lieu thereof the language: 

“Therefore, we reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand 

the case to the Court of Appeals for it to address the remaining issues raised by the 

parties.” 

Cavanagh, Weaver and Kelly, JJ., would deny rehearing. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 15, 2008 

 Clerk
Belinda Sherwood Showfety, Plaintiff, v. Kevin Joseph Showfety, Defendant.

No. COA15-1328

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

REMANDED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.
**Exhibit 99.15****CONSENT OF D. WELLS**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated byreference therein (the “40-F”) of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December31, 2009, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and theAnnual Information Form (the “AIF”) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of theCompany for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference inthe 40-F.     I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the followingreport(s) and to the references, as applicable, to my name in connection with (including, as anexpert) the following report(s) and documents: 1. The technical report dated February 13, 2009, entitled “An UpdatedTechnical Report on the Mineral Reserves of Minera Alumbrera Ltd.,Catamarca, Argentina” (the “Alumbrera Report”); and  2. The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connectionwith information relating to the Alumbrera Report and the AlumbreraMine, and the properties described therein.Date:March 19, 2010              /s/ David T. Wells     Name:  David T. Wells, C. Eng.     Micon International Limited
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

January 31, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00037

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A.S, JR, B.R.S, AND R.C.S, CHILDREN

, From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV

- 14

- 00003 51 Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On October 18, 2017, appellant Deborah Silva was held in contempt for violating certain provisions of a trial court order . On January 19, 2018, appellant filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court’s order of contempt.

This court does not have jurisdiction to review contempt orders by direct appeal. See,
e.g. , Norman v. Norman , 692 S.W.2d 655, 655 (Tex. 1985); Chavira v. Quarry Hills Mgmt., LLC , 458 S.W.3d 561, 565

– 66 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2014, pet. denied). Contempt orders may only be reviewed by an application for a writ of habeas corpus, if the contemnor has been confined, or by a petition for a writ of mandamus, if the contem nor has not been confined. See Rosser v. Squier , 902 S.W.2d 962, 962 (Tex. 1995); Ex parte Williams , 690 S.W.2d 243, 243 n.1 (Tex. 1985); Chavira , 458 S.W.3d at 566. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within two weeks from the date of this order why th is appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

. See Rosser , 902 S.W.2d at 962; Chavira , 458 S.W.3d at 566. All appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of January, 20 18

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit3.1

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENTOFRESTATED CERTIFICATE OFINCORPORATIONOFCPI HOLDCO, INC.a Delawarecorporation

CPI Holdco, Inc., a corporation organized andexisting under the laws of the State of Delaware (the"**Corporation**"), hereby certifies asfollows:

1. That Article I of the Corporation'sRestated Certificate of Incorporation is amended to read in full asfollows:

"ARTICLE I

The nameof the corporation is CPI International, Inc. (the"Corporation")."

2. Thatthe foregoing amendment of the Corporation's Restated Certificateof Incorporation has been duly adopted in accordance with theprovisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, byresolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, and by thewritten consent in lieu of a meeting of the stockholders of theCorporation in accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of theDelaware General Corporation Law.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theCorporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment of RestatedCertificate of Incorporation to be duly executed by its duly authorizedofficer this 13th day of January, 2006.

|  | CPI Holdco,Inc. |
|--|-----------------|

|  |                             |                         |
|--|-----------------------------|-------------------------|
|  | By:     | /s/ JoelA.Littman  |

|  |                               |                |
|--|-------------------------------|----------------|
|  | Name:     | JoelA. Littman |

|  |                                |                                                |
|--|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|  | Title:     | ChiefFinancial Officer, Treasurer andSecretary |

----
Exhibit 10.3


 


The Depository Trust Company


A subsidiary of the Depository Trust
& Clearing Corporation


BLANKET ISSUER LETTER OF REPRESENTATIONS


(To be completed by Issuer and Co-Issuer(s),
if applicable)


AccuShares
Commodities Trust I


(Name of Issuer and Co-Issuer(s), if
applicable)


	12/3/2013
	(Date)







The Depository Trust Company

570 Washington Blvd, 4th FL

Jersey City, NJ 07310

Attention: Underwriting Department


Ladies and Gentlemen:


This letter sets forth our understanding
with respect to all issues (the “Securities”) that Issuer shall request to be made eligible for deposit by The Depository
Trust Company (“DTC”).


Issuer is: (Note: Issuer shall represent one and cross
out the other.)


[incorporated in] [formed under the laws
of] Delaware.


To induce DTC to accept the Securities
as eligible for deposit at DTC, and to act in accordance with DTC’s Rules with respect to the Securities, Issuer represents
to DTC that issuer will comply with the requirements stated in DTC’s Operational Arrangements, as they may be amended from
time to time.


	 	 	Very truly yours,
	Note:	 	 
	Schedule A contains statements that DTC believes accurately describe DTC, the method of effecting book-entry transfers of securities distributed through DTC, and certain related matters.	 	
        AccuShares
        Commodities Trust I

	(Issuer)
	 
	 	 	By:	
        /s/ Forrest
        Gilman

	 	 	 	(Authorized Officer’s Signature)
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
        Forrest Gilman

	 	 	(Print Name)
	 	 	 
	 	 	
        300 First
        Stamford Place – 4th Floor East

	 	 	(Street Address)
	 	 	 
	 	 	
        Stamford,
        CT USA 06902

	 	 	(City)           (State)           (Country)           (Zip Code)
	 	 	 
	 	 	
        (203) 989-4967

	 	 	(Phone Number)
	 	 	 
	 	 	
        forrest.gilman@accushares.com

	 	 	(E-mail Address)
**Exhibit 10.3(e)****FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of this 9th day of April, 2008to that certain AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of May 15, 2002, as amended(collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), by and between DAVID E. ULLMAN (“Employee”) and JOS. A.BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (“Employer”).FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are herebyacknowledged, Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement, herebyamend the Employment Agreement as follows:1. Subject to earlier termination otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the lastday of the Employment Period shall be January 31, 2010.2. Effective May 4, 2008, Employee’s Base Salary shall be $450,000.Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force andeffect according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendmentand the terms of the remainder of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shallcontrol and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respectivemeanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed apart of the Employment Agreement for all purposes. The terms of employment set forth in thisAmendment have been approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Employer.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first abovewritten.         JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC.               By: /s/ Charles D. Frazer   /s/ David E. Ullman             Charles D. Frazer,   DAVID E. ULLMAN    Senior Vice President-General Counsel
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Applix, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2001 and as amended on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, Walt Hilger, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ Walt Hilger
                                        ---------------------------------

Dated: May 19, 2003                     Walt Hilger

                                        Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Applix, Inc. and will be retained by Applix, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Presidential Documents

55021 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 181 

Tuesday, September 20, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7930 of September 16, 2005 

National POW/MIA Recognition Day, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

In every generation, members of our Armed Forces have answered the call 

of service in our Nation’s hour of need. These patriots have defended our 

freedom and way of life, triumphed over brutal enemies, and answered 

the prayers of millions. On National POW/MIA Recognition Day, we honor 

the Americans who have been prisoners of war and recognize them for 

enduring unimaginable hardships while serving in military conflicts around 

the globe. We also remember those who are still missing in action, and 

we renew our commitment to keep searching until we have accounted 

for every Soldier, Sailor, Airman, and Marine missing in the line of duty. 

On National POW/MIA Recognition Day, the flag of the National League 

of Families of American Prisoners and Missing in Southeast Asia is flown 

over the White House, the Capitol, the Departments of State, Defense, and 

Veterans Affairs, the Selective Service System Headquarters, the National 

Vietnam Veterans and Korean War Veterans Memorials, U.S. Military Installations, national cemeteries, and other locations across our country. The flag 

is a reminder of our continued commitment to those brave patriots imprisoned while serving in conflicts around the world and of our pledge to 

continue to achieve the fullest possible accounting for all our men and 

women in uniform who are still missing. Americans are blessed with the 

freedom made possible by the service and sacrifice of so many. On National 

POW/MIA Recognition Day, our entire Nation honors and pays special tribute 

to our prisoners of war and those who remain missing. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Friday, September 16, 

2005, as National POW/MIA Recognition Day. I call upon the people of 

the United States to join me in saluting all American POWs and those 

missing in action who valiantly served our country. I call upon Federal, 

State, and local government officials and private organizations to observe 

this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

55022 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 20, 2005 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixteenth day 

of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–18869 

Filed 9–19–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P