alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

                               AMENDMENT TO THE
                 DIME BANCORP, INC. 1991 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
             (As amended and restated effective February 29, 1996)

                        Effective as of October 1, 1996

     1.   The first sentence of Section 3.1 of the Plan is amended to read as
follows:

          "The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of
Bancorp's Board of Directors or such other committee appointed either by the
Board of Directors of Bancorp (the "Board") or by such Compensation Committee
(the "Committee"); provided, however, to the extent determined necessary to
satisfy the requirements for exemption from Section 16(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"), with respect to the acquisition or
disposition of securities granted or awarded hereunder, action by the Committee
may be by a committee composed solely of two or more "non-employee directors,"
within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 as promulgated under Section 16(b) of the Act,
appointed by the Board or by the Compensation Committee of the Board."

     2.   Section 3 of the Plan is amended to add at the end thereof a new
Section 3.5 as follows:

          "3.5 Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, and to the
extent determined to be necessary to satisfy an exemption under Rule 16b-3 with
respect to the grant of an award hereunder (and, as applicable, with respect to
the disposition to Bancorp of a security acquired pursuant to an award
hereunder), or as otherwise determined advisable by the Committee, the terms of
the grant of awards under the Plan shall be subject to the prior approval of the
Board.  Any prior approval of the Board, as provided in the preceding sentence,
shall not otherwise limit or restrict the authority of the Committee to grant
awards under the Plan,
<PAGE>

including, but not limited to, the authority of the Committee to grant awards
qualifying for the special performance-based compensation exemption under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"),
and the treasury regulations thereunder."

     3.   The second sentence of Section 13.1 of the Plan is amended to read as
follows:

          "The obligation of Bancorp under the Plan shall be conditional on such
payment or arrangements, and Bancorp (and, where applicable, any Related
Company), shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any
such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to the employee including,
but not limited to, the right to withhold shares of stock otherwise deliverable
to the employee with respect to any awards hereunder.
# C_2008197EN.01003701.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/37

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 June 2008 — De Fays v Commission

(Case F-97/07) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Sick leave - Unauthorised absence)

(2008/C 197/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Chantal De Fays (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: P.-P. Van Gehuchten and P. Reyniers, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin and K. Herrmann, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for, first, annulment of the Commission's decisions applying with regard to the applicant Article 60 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and, secondly, an application for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | The application is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed;

| 2. | The parties are to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties are to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007, p. 45.

1

---
June 12, 2001


EXHIBIT 10.5



December 1, 2010



Benjamin A. Pardo

New York, NY



Dear Benjamin:

It is our pleasure to inform you that you will be a participant in the 2011 Knoll, Inc. Incentive Compensation Program. 

In these challenging times our objectives are simple and something that each of us can help contribute to:

Leverage our investments in sales, marketing and design initiatives as well as enhanced operational capabilities to drive top line growth and improved levels of profitability while continuing to make the right investments in products, service and technology to position Knoll for long term success as demand recovers. 

Our success in 2011 and beyond will be a direct result of your ability to help us accomplish these long term goals while meeting our short term 2011 operating profit plan. 

If you achieve your individual goals and Knoll makes its 2011 operating profit plan you can qualify for a total target incentive payment of $250,000.

This award is subject to our approval and that of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors), which may exercise discretion in adjusting your award up or down based on factors the Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors) deems appropriate, including Knoll's performance relative to the industry, other macroeconomic factors and your individual performance.  You must be employed by Knoll on the date this award is distributed in order to receive this incentive.

We have great confidence in your ability to contribute to our success in 2011 and look forward to being able to present you with your award in early 2012. 

Thank you for all that you do for Knoll.

Sincerely,

/s/ Andrew B. Cogan/s/ Lynn M. Utter

Andrew B. CoganLynn M. Utter

CEOPresident and COO
ex10-11.htm


 


Exhibit 10.11







CLEAN ENERGY FUNDING INC.


6040 Upshaw, Ste. 105


Humble, Texas  77396


Tel: (281) 441-2538 




















July 15, 2012     







GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY, INC


4150 St Catherine Street West


Suite 525


Montreal. QC H3Z 2Y5







Attention; Kenneth S. Adessky












RE: Convertible Promissory Note Dated April 25, 2011







Dear Sir,







As you are aware you executed a Convertible Promissory Note to our company for the sum of ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED THIRTY THREE  00/100 DOLLARS ($180,133.00) which was to bear interest at 7.5% per annum and shall be due in twelve (12) months, which was in payment of our original loan of One Hundred  Forty Five Thousand Dollars plus interest made on July 10, 2008.












As stated in the Convertible Promissory Note we hereby request repayment by way of conversion into common stock of your company. We believe the conversion should represent 27,663,283 common shares based on the repayment of the Loan as of today’s date of ONE HUNDRED NINETY THREE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FORTY THREE  00/100 DOLLARS ($193,643.00) at the bid price for the last 5 days being $0.007







Please have the stock issued.


We thank you for your co-operation and remain







Yours Truly,







CLEAN ENERGY FUNDING  INC.







(s) Randy Renken







Per; Randy Renken




 


 


 



Page 1 of 1
----

----

|  | SRK Consulting (UK) Limited      5th Floor Churchill House      17 Churchill Way      City and County of Cardiff      CF10 2HH, Wales       United Kingdom      E-mail:   enquiries@srk.co.uk      URL:   www.srk.co.uk       Tel:     + 44 (0) 2920 348 150      Fax:    + 44 (0) 2920 348 199 |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON**

I, **Martin FrankPittuck**, confirm that:

I am the QualifiedPerson for the **Cukaru Peki Upper Zone Mineral Resource estimate and PEAreferenced in** the **Annual Information Form**of Nevsun Resources Ltd.dated February 23, 2017 (“AIF”).

I have read NationalInstrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”)and understand these Standards as pertains to the work for which I am responsibleas disclosed in the AIF.

I am a CorporateConsultant (Mining Geology) with SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd and have 20 years’experience with estimating Mineral Resources; I am a Chartered Engineer, aProfessional Member of the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining(membership number 49186) and a of Fellow of the Geological Society of London. I am a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101, having **20** years ofexperience which is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of depositdescribed in the AIF, and to the activity for which I am acceptingresponsibility.

I have reviewed theAIF to which this statement of consent applies (draft as of 17thFebruary 2017).

I am independent ofthe issuer as described by Section 1.4 of NI 43-101.

I verify that theinformation in the AIF is based on and fairly and accurately reflects in theform and context in which it appears, the information in my supportingdocumentation relating to **Cukaru Peki Upper Zone Mineral Resources**.

I consent to therelease of the AIF and this statement of consent by Nevsun Resources Ltd.

Dated this 17thFebruary 2017.

***“Martin Frank Pittuck”***  Martin Frank Pittuck

|  | Registered Address:  21 Gold Tops, City and County of Newport, NP20 4PG,       Wales, United Kingdom.      SRK Consulting (UK) Limited Reg No 01575403 (England and Wales) | Group Offices: Africa       Asia       Australia       Europe      North America       South America |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Baker 
& Miller PLLC on behalf of the Kansas City Southern Railway Company 
(WB595-3--9/6/2005) for permission to use certain data from the Board's 
2002-2004 Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of the requests may be 
obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and 
Administration.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, 
Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of 
the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are 
codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541.

Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-18568 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.03


                Consent of Ernst & Young LLP Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-91026, 333-03603, 333-16553, 333-40493, 333-60797, 333-19009,
333-28919, 333-38181, 333-40497, 333-48403, 333-65743, 333-75183, 333-83051, and
333-92987) and related Prospectuses of Quintiles Transnational Corp. of our
report dated January 29, 1999, with respect to the financial statements of ENVOY
Corporation included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 30, 2000.


                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Nashville, Tennessee
March 28, 2000
# C_2009141EN.01000202.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2009 — France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-202/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Abuse of dominant position - Market for services in high-speed Internet access - Predatory pricing - Recoupment of losses - Right to align)

2009/C 141/03

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: France Télécom SA (represented by: J. Philippe, H. Calvet, O.W. Brouwer, T. Janssens, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 January 2007 in Case T-340/03 France Télécom v Commission, in which the Court dismissed France Télécom’s appeal against the Commission Decision of 16 July 2003 relating to a proceeding under Article 82 EC (Case COMP/38.233 — Wanadoo Interactive) — Market for services in high-speed internet access (ADSL) — Abuse of a dominant position — Concept of predatory pricing, alignment of prices with those of competitors and recoupment of losses suffered

France Télécom

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders France Télécom SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders France Télécom SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.

1

---
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I,  Cliff T. Davis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of  Nevsun Resources Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The
issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed
in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The
issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

(b)

Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.

/@/ Cliff T. Davis



Signature

March 30, 2005



Date

Chief Financial Officer



Title
# C_2011311EN.01003203.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2011 — Lucite International and Lucite International UK v Commission

(Case T-216/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for methacrylates - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Attenuating circumstances - Non-implementation in practice of the offending agreements or practices)

2011/C 311/55

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Lucite International Ltd (Southampton, United Kingdom); and Lucite International UK Ltd (Darwen, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Thompson QC, S. Rose and A. Chandler, Solicitors)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by V. Bottka, F. Amato and I. Chatzigiannis, and subsequently by V. Bottka, I. Chatzigiannis and F. Arbault, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for a reduction in the fine imposed on the applicants under Article 2(d) of Commission Decision C(2006) 2098 final of 31 May 2006 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.645 — Methacrylates).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Dismisses the Commission’s request for withdrawal of immunity; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the Commission’s request for withdrawal of immunity;

| 3. | Orders Lucite International Ltd and Lucite International UK Ltd to bear 90 % of their own costs and to pay 90 % of the costs incurred by the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Lucite International Ltd and Lucite International UK Ltd to bear 90 % of their own costs and to pay 90 % of the costs incurred by the Commission;

| 4. | Orders the Commission to bear 10 % of its own costs and to pay 10 % of the costs incurred by Lucite International and Lucite International UK. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission to bear 10 % of its own costs and to pay 10 % of the costs incurred by Lucite International and Lucite International UK.

---

(1)  OJ C 237, 30.9.2006.

1

---
Anthony Enriquez, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

April 6, 2016

ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on December 23, 2014 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Carmen T. Mullen be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Mullen shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where she may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Mullen shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
# C_2009006EN.01001802.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/18

---

Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 8 October 2008 — Cain Cellars, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-508/07 P) (1)

1

(2009/C 6/32)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 26.1.2008.

1

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3809 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain population 

census tracts for which information is not available as low-income communities for purposes of the new markets tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 26, 2013 

Mr. COSTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain population census tracts for which information is 

not available as low-income communities for purposes 

of the new markets tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3809 IH

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN POPULATION CENSUS TRACTS FOR 

2 WHICH INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE 

3 MADE ELIGIBLE FOR NEW MARKETS TAX 

4 CREDIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 45D of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(6) SPECIAL RULE FOR TRACTS FOR WHICH

9 INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE.—In the case of a 

10 population census tract with respect to which the 

11 Secretary determines there is insufficient informa12 tion to determine whether such tract is a low-income 

13 community (determined without regard to this para14 graph), such tract shall be treated as a low-income 

15 community if— 

16 ‘‘(A) such tract is adjacent to two or more 

17 low-income communities (determined without 

18 regard to this paragraph), and 

19 ‘‘(B) the Secretary does not have informa20 tion indicating that such tract is not a low-in21 come community (as so determined).’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 this section shall apply to investments made after the date 

24 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS