alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Mark Wayne BALLARD.

No. 125P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2016.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Mark Wayne Ballard, Marianna, for Ballard, Mark Wayne.

Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of April 2016 by Defendant to Stay:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of April 2016."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 184 (Friday, September 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 17, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Jay Bernstein, Bank 
Supervision Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. New York Community Bancorp, Inc., Westbury, New York; to merge 
with Long Island Financial Corp., Islandia, New York, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Long Island Commercial Bank, Islandia, New York.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Davis Bancshares, Inc., Underwood, North Dakota; to merge with 
Underwood Holding Company, Inc., Underwood, North Dakota, and thereby 
indirectly acquire First Security Bank, Underwood, North Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 19, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-19034 Filed 9-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 32 for 10QSB/A #2 10/31/2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Amended  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Titan
Technologies,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period ended October 31, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, the undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C./  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     a)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

         Date: May 28, 2004                        /s/ Ronald L. Wilder
                                                   --------------------------
                                                   Ronald L. Wilder, President,
                                                   (Chief Executive Officer)
                                                   (Chief Financial Officer)
# C_2009233EN.01001501.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/15

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 2 July 2009 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v European Central Bank (ECB)

(Case T-279/06) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Community public procurement procedure - Supply of consultancy and IT development services for the ECB - Rejection of a tender and decision to award the contract to other tenderers - Action for annulment - Interest in bringing proceedings - Ground for exclusion - Permit to be issued by a national authority - Action in part manifestly unfounded in law and in part manifestly inadmissible)

2009/C 233/25

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. von Lindeiner and G. Gruber, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the ECB’s decision of 31 July 2006 rejecting the offer made by the applicant in the negotiated procedure for the supply of consultancy and IT development services for the ECB and the decision to award the contract to other tenderers.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294 of 2.12.2006.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Gary Maurice WALTERS.

No. 344PA14.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Paul F. Herzog, Fayetteville, Attorney at Law, for Walters, Gary Maurice.

Mary Carla Babb, for State of North Carolina.

Mr. L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney.

*764*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 29th of September 2014 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers
of Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
January 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirement of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 16, 2011

/s/ Douglas
Oliver     Douglas Oliver     
Chief Executive Officer     Yukon Gold Corporation,
Inc.

Dated: March 16, 2011

/s/ Kathy
Chapman     Kathy Chapman     Chief
Financial Officer     Yukon Gold Corporation,
Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. and will be retained by
Yukon Gold Corporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55347-55356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 05-29)


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 05-29 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, Sensitivity of Technology and Section 620C(d).

    Dated: September 14, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 55348]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.011


[[Page 55349]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.012


[[Page 55350]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.013


[[Page 55351]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.014


[[Page 55352]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.015


[[Page 55353]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.016


[[Page 55354]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.017


[[Page 55355]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.018


[[Page 55356]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.019

[FR Doc. 05-18756 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
EXHIBIT 31.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Harry M. Neer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of RPHL Acquisition Corp.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: June 13, 2008 |  |                        
|                    |  | /s/ Harry M. Neer      
|                    |  | Harry M. Neer          
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 11, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00317

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M., B.M., AND E.M., Children,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 00328

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

T he Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellant ’ s brief is due on June 3 0 , 2014

.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trans
Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. Corp, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ John G. Corp           
|John G. Corp               
|Principal Executive Officer
|                           
|September 26, 2013         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Companys Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3805 

To provide for the redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security 

Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 23, 2013 

Ms. HANABUSA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for the redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center 

for Security Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific 

Center for Security Studies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC CEN4 TER FOR SECURITY STUDIES AS THE DANIEL 

5 K. INOUYE ASIA-PACIFIC CENTER FOR SECU6 RITY STUDIES. 

7 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Department of Defense 

8 regional center for security studies known as the Asia-Pa9 cific Center for Security Studies is hereby renamed the 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3805 IH

1 ‘‘Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Stud2 ies’’. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

4 (1) REFERENCE TO REGIONAL CENTERS FOR

5 STRATEGIC STUDIES.—Section 184(b)(2)(B) of title 

6 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies’’ and in8 serting ‘‘Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for 

9 Security Studies’’. 

10 (2) ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS AND DONATIONS.— 

11 Section 2611(a)(2)(B) of such title is amended by 

12 striking ‘‘Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center 

14 for Security Studies’’. 

15 (c) REFERENCES.—Any reference to the Department 

16 of Defense Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in any 

17 law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of 

18 the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to 

19 the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security 

20 Studies. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2007-CR-5359, styled The State of Texas v.

Darryl Bradshaw, filed in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable

Philip Kazen presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00651-CR

IN RE Darryl BRADSHAW

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 24, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On August 25, 2008, relator Darryl Bradshaw filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking

to compel the Honorable Philip Kazen, the clerk of the 227th Judicial District Court, District

Attorney Susan Reed, and public defender Michael Robbins to provide him with a copy of the

indictment charging him with retaliation in Cause No. 2007-CR-5359. Relator was originally

charged with both retaliation and burglary of a habitation with intent to commit assault arising out

of the same incident. Relator acknowledges that after he was convicted of burglary, the retaliation

charge was dismissed. Relator was sentenced to eight years’ confinement for the burglary

conviction. Relator appealed the conviction and this court affirmed the judgment of the trial court.
04-08-00651-CR

-2-

Bradshaw v. State, No. 04-07-00240-CR, 2008 WL 780671 (Tex. App.—San Antonio March 26,

2008, pet. ref’d). Although the retaliation charge against relator was dismissed and he was only

convicted of burglary, relator still seeks to obtain a copy of the indictment relating to the retaliation

charge. 

The only respondent who may have a duty to deliver a copy of the indictment is the clerk of

the court. See CODE CRIM. PROC.ANN. art. 25.01 (Vernon Supp. 2008). When the defendant is first

indicted, the clerk of the court is required to deliver a certified copy of the indictment to the sheriff

who then delivers it to the defendant. Id. However, this court has no mandamus jurisdiction over

a clerk of a court unless the issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b) (Vernon 2004); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). Relator asserts that obtaining a copy of the indictment

will have a direct effect on the appeal of his burglary conviction. However, because this court has

already issued an opinion affirming the judgment of the trial court and mandate has issued, we no

longer have jurisdiction over the case. See In re Washington, No. 08-07-00085-CR, 2007 WL

1168373, *1 (Tex. App.—El Paso April 19, 2007, orig. proceeding); see also In re McAfee, 53

S.W.3d 715, 716 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Therefore, the issuance

of a writ is not necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit 32

                                 BIOCORAL, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Biocoral, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nasser Nassiri, the
President, CEO, Chairman of the Board of the Company and the Principal
Accounting Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Nasser Nassiri
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Nasser Nassiri
                                       President, CEO, Chairman of the Board
                                       and Principal Accounting Officer

Date: March 28, 2008.
Michael P. LONG and Marie C. Long v. CURRITUCK COUNTY, North Carolina and Elizabeth Letendre

No. 274P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

George B. Currin, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Long, Michael P., et al.

Donald I. McRee, Jr., Currituck County Attorney, for Currituck County.

Gregory E. Wills, Attorney at Law, Point Harbor, for Letendre, Elizabeth.

***ORDER***

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of July 2016 by Respondent (Elizabeth Letendre) for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Elizabeth Letendre) on the 26th of July 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*233"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th of July 2016 by Respondent (Elizabeth Letendre) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."