alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3779 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3779

  To require the Director of National Intelligence to annually submit 
  reports on violations of law or executive order by personnel of the 
            intelligence community, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2013

 Mr. Himes (for himself and Mr. Schiff) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent 
                                Select)

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Director of National Intelligence to annually submit 
  reports on violations of law or executive order by personnel of the 
            intelligence community, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANNUAL REPORT ON VIOLATIONS OF LAW OR EXECUTIVE ORDER.

    (a) In General.--Title V of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 
U.S.C. 3091 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 509. ANNUAL REPORT ON VIOLATIONS OF LAW OR EXECUTIVE ORDER.

    ``(a) Annual Reports Required.--The Director of National 
Intelligence shall annually submit to the congressional intelligence 
committees a report on violations of law or executive order by 
personnel of an element of the intelligence community that were 
identified during the previous calendar year.
    ``(b) Elements.--Each report required under subsection (a) shall 
include a description of, and any action taken in response to, any 
violation of law or executive order (including Executive Order 12333 
(50 U.S.C. 3001 note)) by personnel of an element of the intelligence 
community in the course of such employment that, during the previous 
calendar year, was determined by the director, head, general counsel, 
or inspector general of any element of the intelligence community to 
have occurred or more than likely to have occurred.''.
    (b) Initial Report.--The first report required under section 509 of 
the National Security Act of 1947, as added by subsection (a), shall be 
submitted not later than one year after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections in the first section 
of the National Security Act of 1947 is amended by adding after the 
section relating to section 508 the following:

``Sec. 509. Annual report on violations of law or executive order.''.
                                 <all>
```
# CE2004088EN.01032001.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/320 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/320

---

(2004/C 88 E/0325)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0230/03

by Helle Thorning-Schmidt (PSE) to the Commission

(4 February 2003)

Subject:   Implications of enlargement for jobs of customs agents

Subject:

Analyses show that almost 22 000 customs agents stand to lose their jobs in 2004; 20 000 of those lost jobs will be in the Central and Eastern European countries as a result of enlargement. Some customs agents are therefore already looking for other employment because they know that most of them will lose their jobs as of May 2004. This situation may give rise to a number of practical problems as customs agents are responsible for ensuring that both the EU's and the applicant countries' customs regulations are complied with as a condition of goods crossing the EU's external borders.

What steps will the Commission take to safeguard the EU's cross-border trade with the applicant countries through to 1 May 2004? Will the Commission take measures to provide customs agents with an incentive to remain in their jobs until enlargement takes place? Can the Commission envisage introducing an arrangement similar to the one that applied in 1992 for the transition to the internal market? If not, how will the Commission resolve this emerging problem?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(14 March 2003)

(14 March 2003)

As the Commission has already indicated, in its reply to Mr Lisi's Written Question E-2488/02 (1), it does not intend to introduce an arrangement similar to the one applied in 1992 for the transition to the internal market. In its reply to the above Question, the Commission pointed out the options available to Member States under the Structural Funds and the guidelines adopted for State aid.

1

---

(1)  OJ C 52 E, 6.3.2003, p. 179.

1

---
# C_2008209EN.01001201.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 June 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-220/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2002/22/EC - Electronic communications - Designation of the undertakings entrusted with the provision of universal service - Incorrect transposition)

(2008/C 209/16)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne and M. Shotter, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and B. Messmer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Incorrect transposition [of Articles 8, 12 and 13] of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (‘Universal Service Directive’) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51) — Obligation to use an efficient, objective, transparent and non-discriminatory mechanism to designate undertakings entrusted with the provision of universal service — National legislation immediately excluding economic operators which are not capable of ensuring the provision of that service throughout the national territory

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by transposing into national law in the way it did the provisions concerning the designation of the undertakings capable of guaranteeing the provision of universal service, the French Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 8(2), 12 and 13 and Annex IV of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (‘Universal Service Directive’). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by transposing into national law in the way it did the provisions concerning the designation of the undertakings capable of guaranteeing the provision of universal service, the French Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 8(2), 12 and 13 and Annex IV of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (‘Universal Service Directive’).

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211 of 8.9.2007.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6667

JEROME WORKMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden at Perry Correctional Institution,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (9:07-cv-02190-GRA)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 22, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Workman, Appellant Pro Se. James Anthony Mabry, Columbia,

South Carolina, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney

General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Workman seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Workman has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Surveillance Review, Program Announcement PAR-04-106.                    

*Times and Dates:*                         8 a.m.-5 p.m., November 2, 2005 (Closed), 8 a.m.-5 p.m., November 3, 2005 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Inner Harbor at Camden Yard, 110 South Eutaw Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, Telephone Number 410.962.0202.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to: Surveillance Review, Program Announcement PAR-04-106.                    

*Contact Person For More Information:*                         Steve Olenchock, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26506, Telephone 304.285.6127.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: September 13, 2005.

Alvin Hall,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 05-18527 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of CPI International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joel Littman,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Joel A.  Littman     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Joel A.  Littman         |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| May 15, 2006             |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Vanguard Minerals Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vladimir Fedyunin, in my capacity as President, Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Vladimir
      FedyuninDate:  
      November 12, 2009
            Vladimir
      Fedyunin
              President,
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and
      Director
# C_2008209EN.01005301.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/53

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 17 June 2008 — FMC Chemical and Arysta Lifesciences v EFSA

(Case T-311/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Action for damages - Directive 91/414/EEC - Plant protection products - Opinion of the European Food Safety Authority - Non-actionable measure - Preparatory measure - Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 209/94)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: FMC Chemical SPRL (Brussels, Belgium) and Arysta Lifesciences SAS (Noguères, France) (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (represented initially by: A. Cuvillier and D. Detken, subsequently by A. Cuvillier and S. Gabbi, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: European Crop Protection Association (ECPA), (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by D. Waelbroeck and N. Rampal, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by B. Doherty, Agent)

Re:

APPLICATION for (i) annulment of the opinion of EFSA of 28 July 2006 on the assessment of the active substance carbofuran under Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the marked (OJ 1991 L 230, p. 1), and (ii) compensation for the damage sustained

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | FMC Chemical SPRL, Arysta Lifesciences SAS, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) and the Commission shall each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

FMC Chemical SPRL, Arysta Lifesciences SAS, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) and the Commission shall each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136369 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136369 

 COA: 283606 

Branch CC: 01-007197-FC 

ANTHONY SCOTT CAMPBELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OSE M I GU EL RODRI GU EZ , P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. M ATTHEW CATE , R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 56989 D . C . N o . 3 : 1 0 -cv -0 2 6 5 1 -A JB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A nthonyJ . B a tt a gl i a , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t8, 2012 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , B E R Z O N , a n dI K U T A , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . C a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one rJ os e M i gue l R odr i gue z appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on f or f a i l u r e t o s t a t e ac l a i m . We h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U. S . C . § 2 2 5 3 , a n dwe 

# FI LED AU G 14 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 56989 2 a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed R od ri gu ez ’ s pet i t i on because the court l ac ked j uri sdi ct i on t o con si der hi s c l ai m s thatthe re st i tut i on order i m po se d as part o f h is s e n te n c e v io la te dh is d u e p r o c e s s a n dE ig h t A m e n d m e n t r ig h ts . See 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4(a) ; B a ile yv . Hill , 59 9 F . 3d 97 6, 98 2 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( “ § 2 25 4(a) doe s notc onf

e rj ur i s di c t i on ove ras t a t e pr i s one r ’ s i n- c us t odyc ha l l e nge t o a re st i tut i on order i m po se d as partof a c ri m i nal se nt ence ”) . AF F I RME D.
RADICA GAMES LIMITED

          THE UNITS OF SALES BY EACH CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS - (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Quarter ended
                  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  September 30, 1998      June 30, 1998       March 31, 1998     December 31, 1997
                  ------------------      -------------       --------------     -----------------
<S>                <C>                    <C>                <C>                 <C>
Product Lines           Units Sold          Units Sold         Units Sold            Units Sold
-------------           ----------          ----------         ----------            ----------
Sports games               417,989             288,526             89,692               214,663
Heritage games             344,085             205,346            172,147               341,185
Fishing games            1,523,912           1,284,959          1,326,676             1,812,746
Combat games               176,009             101,942             57,869               154,122
Casino games
 -- Tabletop                63,123              42,114             36,983                41,292
 -- Handheld               843,004             551,794            799,303               759,990
Extreme games              162,524             177,415              8,908                     -
ODM products             2,180,411             971,904            908,100             1,037,058
                        ----------          ----------         ----------            ----------
Total                    5,711,057           3,624,000          3,399,678             4,361,056
                        ==========          ==========         ==========            ==========
</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3652 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for penalties for aggravated 

identity theft facilitated by employment at an agency implementing the 

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 4, 2013 

Mr. HOLDING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for penalties for aggravated identity theft facilitated by employment at an agency implementing the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Identity Theft in 

5 Health Care Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CERTAIN HEALTHCARE-RELATED OFFENSES. 

7 Section 1028A of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended by inserting after paragraph (2): 

maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3652 IH

1 ‘‘(3) CERTAIN HEALTHCARE-RELATED OF2 FENSES.—Whoever, during and in relation to any 

3 felony violation enumerated in subsection (c), know4 ingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful au5 thority, a means of identification of another person, 

6 if that transfer, possession, or use was facilitated by 

7 being an officer or employee of the United States or 

8 of any department or agency thereof charged with 

9 the implementation of the Patient Protection and 

10 Affordable Care Act, shall, in addition to the punish11 ment provided for such felony, be sentenced to a 

12 term of imprisonment of 5 years.’’. 

Æ 

maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE v. Quincey Lamar HILL.

No. 150P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Quincey Lamar Hill, Bayboro, for Hill, Quincey Lamar.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of August 2015 by Defendant to Amend:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

BEASLEY, J., recused.