alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009282EN.01000602.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 1 October 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Special Commissioners of Income Tax, London –United Kingdom) — HSBC Holdings plc, Vidacos Nominees Ltd v The Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

(Case C-569/07) (1)

1

(Indirect taxation - Raising of capital - Levying of a duty of 1,5 % on the transfer or issue of shares into a clearance service)

2009/C 282/10

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Special Commissioners of Income Tax, London

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: HSBC Holdings plc, Vidacos Nominees Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: The Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Special Commissioners of Income Tax, London — Interpretation of Articles 10 and 11 of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ 1969 L 249, p. 5), as amended by Council Directive 85/303/EEC of 10 June 1985 (OJ 1985 L 156, p. 23), and of Articles 43, 49 and 56 EC — Offer by a company (‘A’) established in a Member State to acquire the shares of a company (‘B’) established in another Member State in exchange for the issue of shares in company A on the stock market of the other Member State — Imposition of a duty of 1.5 % on the transfer or issuing of shares in a clearance service

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11(a) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital, as amended by Council Directive 85/303/EEC of 10 June 1985, must be interpreted as meaning that it prohibits the levying of a duty, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, on the issue of shares into a clearance service.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.

1

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3927 

To amend section 3716 of title 31, United States Code, to raise to at 

least the poverty line the amount of Social Security benefits that are 

exempt from being offset to satisfy student loan debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2014 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 3716 of title 31, United States Code, 

to raise to at least the poverty line the amount of Social 

Security benefits that are exempt from being offset to 

satisfy student loan debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO RAISE TO THE POVERTY LINE 

4 THE AMOUNT OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENE5 FITS THAT ARE EXEMPT FROM BEING OFF6 SET TO SATISFY STUDENT LOAN DEBT. 

7 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 3716(c)(3) of title 31, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3927 IH

1 (1) in clause (i), by inserting after ‘‘except as 

2 provided in clause (ii)’’ the following: ‘‘or clause 

3 (iii)’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

5 clause: 

6 ‘‘(iii) For purposes of clause (ii), in the case of a 

7 claim for student loan debt, in lieu of the exemption 

8 amount of $9,000 applicable with respect to payments due 

9 an individual under the Social Security Act, the amount 

10 of the poverty line shall be the exemption amount. For 

11 purposes of this clause— 

12 ‘‘(I) the term ‘student loan debt’ means the 

13 outstanding balance of principal or interest owed on 

14 any loan made, insured, or guaranteed under title IV 

15 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

16 1070 et seq.); and 

17 ‘‘(II) the term ‘poverty line’ means the annual 

18 poverty guideline for the applicable calendar year (as 

19 updated annually in the Federal Register by the De20 partment of Health and Human Services under the 

21 authority of section 673(2) of the Omnibus Budget 

22 Reconciliation Act of 1981) as applicable to a single 

23 individual for the year in which the exemption under 

24 clause (ii) is applied.’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3927 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this Act shall apply with respect to payments made under 

3 the Social Security Act after the date that is 90 days after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|   | **KPMG LLP      Chartered Accountants**      PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street      Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3      Canada | Telephone  (604) 691-3000      Fax              (604) 691-3031      Internet       www.kpmg.ca |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED    PUBLIC ACCOUNTING  FIRM**

The  Board of Directors of Nevsun Resources Ltd.

We consent to the  inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of:

| 1. | our  auditors' report dated March 28, 2012, on the consolidated balance sheets of  NevsunResources Ltd. (the “Company”) as at December 31, 2011 and December31,  2010, and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), changes  in equity and cash flows for the years then ended; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | our  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March28,  2012 on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of  December31, 2011; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

each of  which is contained in this annual report on Form 40-F of  the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Chartered  Accountants

March  28, 2012Vancouver, Canada

|   | KPMG LLP  is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG      network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International  Cooperative       (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.       KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136426 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136426 

 COA: 283690 

Gogebic CC: 05-000111-FH 

ROBERT THOMAS GURDA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 19, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case for resentencing in light of People v Cannon, 

481 Mich 152 (2008). 

d0916 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 19, 2008 

 Clerk
**EXHIBITA**

**Section906 Certifications**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of **Nevsun Resources Ltd.** (the“Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending **December 31, 2011**, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), **I**, **Peter J. Hardie, Chief Financial Officer**of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1. | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: **March 29, 2012**

| By: | */s/ Peter J. Hardie*******Chief Financial Officer** |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------|

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 183 (Thursday, September 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18902]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Board of Advisors (BOA) to the President, Naval 
Postgraduate School (NPS)

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of the meeting is to elicit the advice of the 
board on the Naval Service's Postgraduate Education Program and the 
collaborative exchange and partnership between NPS and the Air Force 
Institute of Technology (AFIT). The board examines the effectiveness 
with which the NPS is accomplishing its mission. To this end, the board 
will inquire into the curricula; instruction; physical equipment; 
administration; state of morale of the student body, faculty, and 
staff; fiscal affairs; and any other matters relating to the operation 
of the NPS as the board considers pertinent. This meeting will be open 
to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 18, 2005, from 8 
a.m. to 4 p.m. and on Wednesday, October 19, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 12 
p.m. All written comments regarding the NPS BOA should be received by 
October 7, 2005, and be directed to President, Naval Postgraduate 
School (Attn: Jaye Panza), 1 University Circle, Monterey, CA 93943-5000 
or by fax 831-656-3145.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Navy Memorial and Naval 
Heritage Center, President's Room, 701 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaye Panza, Naval Postgraduate School, 
Monterey, CA, 93943-5000, telephone number 831-656-2514.

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
I.C. Le Moyne Jr.,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate Generals Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate Federal 
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18902 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.02

                        Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors
    of BRI International, Inc.

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of BRI
International, Inc., formerly Biometric Research Institute, Inc., (the Company)
as of November 30, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of BRI
International, Inc. as of November 30, 1995 and 1994, and the consolidated
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

        Certain stockholders' equity amounts as of November 30, 1993 have been
restated to give effect to the pooling of interests described in Note 3 and to
correct for prior period adjustments described in Note 12.




                                           /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



Rockville, Maryland
May 15, 1996
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 10, 2005, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute: Cooperative Research Group on High Efficiency Durable Gasoline Engine (“HEDGE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI; Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Kasagawa, JAPAN; Renault s.a.s., Société par Actions Simplifiée, Boulogne-Billancourt, FRANCE; and Valeo Systemes de Controle Moteur, Cedex, FRANCE have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and HEDGE intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On June 10, 2005, HEDGE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 7, 2005 (70 FR 39339).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 05-18945 Filed 9-21-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
State of North Carolina v. Angel Vazquez

No. COA16-191

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 6, 2016

NO ERROR IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART.
State v. Mark Wayne Ballard

125P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

Mark Wayne Ballard, Pro Se.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of April 2016 by Defendant for Appointment of Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
# C_2023321EN.01005902.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/59

---

Action brought on 14 July 2023 — Nordea Rahoitus Suomi v SRB

(Case T-414/23)

(2023/C 321/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nordea Rahoitus Suomi Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Decision of the SRB of 2 May 2023, document no. SRB/ES/2023/23, including Annexes I, II and III, as far as it concerns the ex-ante contribution of the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Decision of the SRB of 2 May 2023, document no. SRB/ES/2023/23, including Annexes I, II and III, as far as it concerns the ex-ante contribution of the applicant;

| — | order the SRB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the SRB to pay the costs.

Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the SRB has infringed Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 (1) by not applying the binding 12,5 % cap to the target level when determining the 2023 annual target level.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).

---
State v. Simaron Demetrius Hill

165P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

Simaron D. Hill, for Hill, Simaron Demetrius.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of May 2016 by Defendant for Peremptory Setting:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
Roxanne POWERS, Plaintiff, v. James POWERS, Defendant.

No. COA15-1378.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 21, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Vacated and Remanded in Part, Dismissed in part, Affirmed in part.
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Roger COLE, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA15-1291.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Aug. 2, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Error.
# C_2009006EN.01000302.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 November 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-46/07) (1)

1

(Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations - Article 141 EC - Social Policy - Equal pay for male and female workers - Concept of ‘pay’ - Officials' retirement scheme)

(2009/C 6/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I. Braguglia, Agent and G. Fiengo and W. Ferrante, Lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Article 141 EC — Infringement of the principle of equal pay for male and female workers — National legislation providing for a retirement age for public officials which varies according to sex

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | declares that by maintaining provisions under which the age at which officials have the right to receive the old-age pension varies according to whether they are men or women, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 141 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that by maintaining provisions under which the age at which officials have the right to receive the old-age pension varies according to whether they are men or women, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 141 EC;

| 2. | orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 14.4.2007.

1

---
FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



        THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (this "Amendment") is made as of the 14th day of
February, 1999, by and between CHARLES D. FRAZER ("Executive") and JOS. A. BANK
CLOTHIERS, INC. ("Employer") to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of
September 19, 1997 (the "Employment Agreement").

        FOR GOOD AND VALUATION CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which
are hereby acknowledged, Executive and Employer, being the sole parties to the
Employment Agreement, hereby amend the Employment Agreement by increasing
Executive's Base Salary (as set forth in Section 4.1 of the Employment
Agreement) to $150,000.00.

        Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect according to its terms. To the extent of any
conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the remainder of
the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control and prevail.
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respective
meanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall
hereafter be deemed a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Amendment as of the date first above written.



                                      /s/ Charles D. Frazer
                                      -------------------------------
                                      CHARLES D. FRAZER



                                      JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC.


                                      By: /s/ Timothy F. Finley
                                         ----------------------------------
                                      Name: Timothy F. Finley
                                      Title: Chairman & CEO