alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
     <CIK>                    0000932092
     <NAME>                   ILM II LEASE CORPORATION
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                                   2,416
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              272
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         2,688
<PP&E>                                                     653
<DEPRECIATION>                                             136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           3,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    2,447
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                   500
<OTHER-SE>                                                 424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             3,447
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        11,540
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           11,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            341
<INCOME-TAX>                                               136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        205
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                               205
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .04
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, G. Kenneth Burckhardt, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of McLeodUSA Incorporated;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: April 30, 2004 | /s/G. KENNETH BURCKHARDTG. Kenneth Burckhardt
Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
----

Action brought on 24 February 2006 — Armando Álvarez v Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-78/06)

(2006/C 121/24)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Armando Álvarez (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Garayar and A. García Castillo, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

This action seeks annulment of Commission C(2005) 4634 Final of 30 November 2005 in Case COMP/F/38.354 — industrial bags. In the contested decision, the Commission states that the applicant, together with other companies, infringed Article 81 EC by participating, in the period 1991-2002, in agreements and concerted practices in the industrial plastic bag sector in Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Spain and France. In respect of these infringements, the Commission imposed a fine on the applicant jointly and severally with Plásticos Españoles, S.A.

In support of its claim, the applicant alleges that the Commission wrongly assessed the facts and infringed the principle of the presumption of innocence and the claimant's rights of defence.

----
exhibit10_31.htm







 



Exhibit 10.31




 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 







 


 







 


 


$400,000.00                                                                                       Date:  May 19, 2014


 


 







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of K. F. Properties, the sum of Four Hundred Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($400,000.00), together with interest of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.


 


 


The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof.


 


 







 


 


 

 


 


 


”Borrower”


 


Aura Systems, Inc.












____________________


Melvin Gagerman


Chief Executive Officer







 


Dated: May19, 2014
Certificate of Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation


For Nevada Profit
Corporations


(Pursuant
to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 – After Issuance of Stock)






1.
              Name
      of corporation:


iDcentrix,
Inc.


2.
                The
      articles have been amended as follows: (provide article numbers, if
      available)


Article 3
(Shares) shall be amended to add the following paragraph:


“Effective
as of the filing date of this Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of
State of the State of Nevada the outstanding shares of common stock of the
Corporation shall be combined on the basis that two hundred eighty-four (284) of
such shares of common stock shall become one (1) share of common stock without
changing the par value of the shares of the Corporation (the "Reverse Stock
Split"); provided that no fractional shares of the Corporation shall be issued
in connection with the Reverse Stock Split and the number of shares to be
received by a stockholder shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number of
shares in the event that such stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive
a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split."





3.    
       The vote by which the stockholders
holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise a least a majority
of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be
required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by
the provisions of the articles of incorporation* have voted in favor of the
amendment is:   53.81%




4.
                Effective
      Date of
  filing:  (optional)


(must not
be later than 90 days after the certificate is filed)


5.
                Signature:  (required)







/s/
      Tsoi Tik ManSignature
      of Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
     I, Robert W. Zoller, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kitty Hawk,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        May 14, 2004 By:  /s/ ROBERT W. ZOLLER, JR.    Robert W. Zoller, Jr.    Chief Executive Officer and President
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tora Technologies Inc. (“Tora”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert E. Rook,
      President, Chief Executive Officer of Tora and a member of the Board of
      Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of Tora.








*/s/
      Robert E. Rook*


Robert
      E.
      Rook


Chief
      Executive Officer






November
      14, 2006






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tora Technologies Inc. (“Tora”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Munjit Johal, Chief
      Financial Officer of Tora and a member of the Board of Directors, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of Tora.






*/s/
      Munjit Johal*


Munjit
      Johal


Chief
      Financial Officer




November
      14, 2006
Exhibit
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Patent
Development Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
(the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
(section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
      HARVEY P. EISENName:
            Harvey
      P. EisenTitle:
            Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
            August
      14, 2008
 
 
 
 /s/
      IRA J. SOBOTKOName:
            Ira
      J. SobotkoTitle:
            Vice
      President, Chief
              Financial
      OfficerDate:
            August
      14, 2008
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133070 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 133070 

 COA: 274442 

Kent CC: 05-009295-FC 

TRACY EDWARD WILBURN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of May 30, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 

2006 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People 

v Cannon (Docket No. 131994). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

June 4, 2008, 481 Mich 152 (2008), the application is again considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed 

by this Court. 

s0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2008 

 Clerk
# C_2008051EN.01003701.xml

| 23.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/37

---

Action brought on 20 December 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Malta

(Case C-563/07)

(2008/C 51/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Wölker and D. Lawunmi, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Malta

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to provide the information necessary to comply with Decision No. 280/2004/EC (‘the Decision’) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 concerning a mechanism for monitoring Community Greenhouse gas emissions and for implementing the Kyoto Protocol (1) in Malta in conjunction with Articles 2 to 7 of Commission Decision 166/2005/EC of 10 February 2005 laying down rules implementing Decision 280/2004/EC, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) of the Decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to provide the information necessary to comply with Decision No. 280/2004/EC (‘the Decision’) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 concerning a mechanism for monitoring Community Greenhouse gas emissions and for implementing the Kyoto Protocol (1) in Malta in conjunction with Articles 2 to 7 of Commission Decision 166/2005/EC of 10 February 2005 laying down rules implementing Decision 280/2004/EC, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(1) of the Decision.

1

Pleas in law and main arguments

According to Article 3(1) of decision No 280/2004/EC the Member States shall, for the assessment of actual progress and to enable the preparation of annual reports by the Community, in accordance with obligations under the UNFCCC and the Kyoto protocol, provide the Commission with certain information regarding greenhouse gas emissions by 15 January each year.

In view of the fact that the Republic of Malta has not provided the Commission with the information due on 15 January 2006 the Commission is obliged to assume that the Maltese authorities have failed to meet their obligations under Article 3(1) of the decision.

---

(1)  OJ L 49, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2009167EN.01001001.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/10

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 June 2009 — Frosch Touristik v OHIM — DSR touristik (FLUGBÖRSE)

(Case T-189/07) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark FLUGBÖRSE - Material date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2009/C 167/20

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Frosch Touristik GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H. Lauf and T. Raab, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by B. Schmidt, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DSR touristik GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 March 2007 (Case R 1084/2004-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between DSR touristik GmbH and Frosch Touristik GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 March 2007 (Case R 1084/2004-4). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 March 2007 (Case R 1084/2004-4).

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 4.8.2007.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1390

ROBERT MCBRIDE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FRANK DUNN, Vice President Tidewater Community College (TCC);

BETTY CREDLE, Media Specialist II TCC,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (2:07-cv-00331-RBS-JEB)

Submitted: August 20, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert McBride appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging

employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. McBride v. Dunn, No. 2:07-cv-00331-RBS-JEB

(E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2010



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2010
NC Department of Public Safety v. Ledford

223PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 22, 2016

Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, For North Carolina Department of Public Safety.

Larry Leake, Attorney at Law, Asheville, For Ledford, Chauncey John.

Jamie A. Stokes, Attorney at Law.

J. Michael McGuinness, Attorney at Law, Elizabethtown, For Southern States Police Benevolent Association, et al.

Michael C. Byrne, Attorney at Law, Norris Arden Adams, II, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For State Employees Association of North Carolina and North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of December 2016 by Stte Employees Association of North Carolina and North Carolina Fraternal Order of Police for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of December 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).