alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statements of Income and Consolidated Balance Sheets found on pages
2 and 3 of the Company 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             315
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         817,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                 105,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 749,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        387,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     362,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   749,794
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,237
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
        

</TABLE>
# C_2006261EN.01002201.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/22

---

Action brought on 28 August 2006 — Eyropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-232/06)

(2006/C 261/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Eyropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision of DG TAXUD to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of DG TAXUD to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor;

| — | order DG TAXUD to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

order DG TAXUD to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected;

| — | order DG TAXUD to pay applicant's damages suffered on account of the tendering procedure in question. |
| --- | --- |

—

order DG TAXUD to pay applicant's damages suffered on account of the tendering procedure in question.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of its application, the applicant seeks annulment of DG TAXUD's decision of 19 June 2006, rejecting its bid filed in response to the open Call for Tenders TAXUD/2005/AO-001 for specification, development, maintenance and support of customs IT services relating to projects of the DG-TAXUD ‘CUST-DEV’ (OJ 2005/S 117-115222) and awarding the same Call for Tender to another bidder.

In support of its claims the applicant puts forward that, in the framework of the said tendering procedure, DG TAXUD failed to respect the procedural requirements set out in the Financial Regulation and its Implementing Rules, thus resulting in unequal treatment of tenderers and violation of principles of transparency and sound administration. Moreover, DG TAXUD's decision allegedly contained manifest errors of assessment and according to the applicant, by far exceeded the discretion that European Institutions dispose of when evaluating tenders.

---
Exhibit 10.13(c)



FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



THIS FIRST AMENDMENT
(this Amendment) is made as of this 30th day of April, 2003 to that certain AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of May 15, 2002 (the Employment Agreement), by and between CHARLES D. FRAZER
(Employee) and JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (Employer).



FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement, hereby amend the Employment
Agreement as follows:



1. Subject to earlier
termination otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the last day of the Employment Period shall be January 31, 2005.



2. Effective March 3, 2003, Employees Base Salary shall be $185,000.



Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the remainder of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not defined
herein shall have those respective meanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.



|JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. |  |                         |  | 
|---------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|                            
|By:                          |  | /s/ ROBERT N. WILDRICK  |  | 
|                             |  | Robert N. Wildrick      |  | 
|                             |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
Marty HOLLOWAY, Employee v. TYSON FOODS, INC., Self-Insured, Employer.

No. 541P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

David R. Paletta, Boone, for Holloway.

Bambee B. Blake, Cary, for Tyson Foods.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 668 S.E.2d 72.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of December 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 10.22

                AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment"), made as of
this 4th day of November, 2003, by and between Cronos Containers S.r.L., an
Italian corporation (the "Employer"), and Nico Sciacovelli (the "Employee"),

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                               - - - - - - - - - -


WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into a Memorandum Employment Agreement,
dated as of December 1, 1999, as amended on December 18, 2001 and November 5,
2002 (hereinafter, the "Employment Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to clauses 1.1 and 12.1 of the Employment Agreement, Employer
agreed to employ Employee, and Employee agreed to serve in the employ of the
Employer, on an exclusive and full-time basis, as the Vice President of Europe
of Employer, through November 30, 2004, subject to earlier termination pursuant
to the provisions of the Employment Agreement; and

WHEREAS, Employer and Employee desire to extend the term of the Employment
Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and
other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:

      5. Extension of Term of Employment Agreement. Employer agrees to employ
the Employee, and the Employee agrees to serve in the employ of the Employer, on
an exclusive and full-time basis, in the position identified for Employee in the
Employment Agreement, subject to the supervision and direction of that person or
persons set forth in the Employment Agreement, through November 30, 2005, unless
such period is sooner terminated by either party giving the other not less than
three (3) months written notice and pursuant to the provisions of the Employment
Agreement.

      6. Continuance in Force of Employment Agreement. Other than as
specifically amended hereby, the terms and provisions of the Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

                                                                              E5

<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.22

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer and the Employee have signed this Amendment,
effective as of the date and year first above written.

                        "EMPLOYER"

                        CRONOS CONTAINERS S.R.L.


                        By /s/ PETER J YOUNGER
                           ----------------------------------
                        Its Director

                        "EMPLOYEE"


                        /s/ NICO SCIACOVELLI
                        -------------------------------------
                        Nico Sciacovelli


                                                                              E6
Exhibit 99.11

CONSENT OF DENIS FLEURY

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp
Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and/or documents:



|1. | The technical report that has an effective date of January 26, 2014, entitled Éléonore Gold Project Québec, Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Éléonore
Report); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Éléonore Report and the Éléonore Project, and the properties described therein.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF
into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376, 333-181116 and 333-188805 on Form S-8 of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2014



/s/ Denis FleuryName: Denis Fleury, P.Eng.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                          15,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,479
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,066
<PP&E>                                          16,868
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,521
<SALES>                                         36,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,933
<CGS>                                           13,553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (956)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,466)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,290)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 4, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137197 & (16)(17) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

MAYOR OF DETROIT, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 137197 

 COA: 287462 
 Wayne CC: 08-122051-CZ

GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN and 

DETROIT CITY COUNCIL, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the September 2, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals 

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay of proceedings is 

DENIED. 

p0903 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 4, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 15, 2000; THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 24 WEEKS ENDED APRIL 15, 2000; AND
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE 24 WEEKS ENDED APRIL
15, 2000. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-15-2000
<CASH>                                            5087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    87114
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1512
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                114998
<PP&E>                                           51419
<DEPRECIATION>                                   29436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  179869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            52236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                       77378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    179869
<SALES>                                         295258
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                296820
<CGS>                                           234566
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   289098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (124)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   980
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6305
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2491
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3814
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3814
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
##### 





Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applix, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended September 30, 2002 as originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 13, 2002 and as amended on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
Walt Hilger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                    
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2003 |  | /s/ Walt Hilger                    
|                      |  | Walt Hilger
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Applix, Inc. and will be
retained by Applix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

32
# C_2008079EN.01001001.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-268/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2004/17/EC - Public procurement proceedings in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors)

(2008/C 79/17)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky and D. Kukovec, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Lee ALLEN.

No. COA16-29.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
# C_2010011EN.01002603.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/26

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 October 2009 — Lebard v Commission

(Case T-89/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 11/52

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Daniel Lebard (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. de Guillenchmidt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and F. Amato and, subsequently, M. Gippini Fournier, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Inter alia, an application for annulment of the decisions of the Commission rejecting, first, the request for a review as to whether the company Aventis had complied with the commitments entered into in connection with the Commission’s decision of 9 August 1999 in Case IV/M.1378 — Hoechst/Rhône-Poulenc, and, second, the application for withdrawal of the Commission’s decision of 13 July 1999 in Case IV/M.1517 — Rhodia/Donau Chemie/Albright & Wilson.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Daniel Lebard shall bear his own costs as well as the costs incurred by the Commission of the European Communities. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Daniel Lebard shall bear his own costs as well as the costs incurred by the Commission of the European Communities.

| 3. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Valauret SA. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by Valauret SA.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.

1

---