alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

      In connection with the Annual Report of Viewpoint Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William H. Mitchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

|              | (1) |   | The Report to which this certification is attached as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              | (2) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                         |

| Dated: March 20, 2006 | By: |   | /s/ WILLIAM H. MITCHELL                William H. MitchellChief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|-----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
In the Matter of: M.M., Juvenile

No. COA16-77

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: August 16, 2016

VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED.
STATE v. Calvin Sherwood WATTS.

No. 132A16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 2016.

John Keating Wiles, Raleigh, for Watts, Calvin Sherwood.

Laura E. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of April 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."
EX-10.3.1



 Exhibit 10.3.1 
  

 
 



             
 local online advertising 

50 West 23rd Street 
 New York, New
York 10010 
 February 1, 2010 
 Matana LLC 

c/o The Moinian Group 
 530 Fifth Avenue, 18th Floor 

New York, New York 10036 
 Re: Agreement of Lease
dated October 28, 2008, (the “Lease”), between Matana. LLC (“Landlord”) and Yodle, Inc. (“Tenant”), with respect to certain premises on the fourth floor (the “Premises”) in the building known as 50 West
23rd Street, New York, New York. 
 Gentlemen: 

Reference is made to the Lease. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning as ascribed in the Lease. 

This letter shall confirm that the Additional Space Inclusion Date shall mean February 1, 2010 and that Tenant accepts the Additional
Space In its “As-is” condition as of that date. Landlord hereby agrees that Tenant shall be allowed to perform certain Alterations In the Additional Space (subject to review and consent from Landlord) as of the Additional Space Inclusion
Date, but shall not be permitted to operate Its business in the Additional Space, and shall only be permitted to perform work in order to prepare the space for its use, prior to March 1, 2010. 

The Lease is hereby amended to the effect that: 

1. The Additional Space Inclusion Date shall be February 1, 2010; provided that (a) Tenant’s obligation to pay Landlord any
amounts for the Additional Space shall not commence until March 1, 2010 and (b) Tenant’s use of the Additional Space shall be limited to performance of Alterations until March 1, 2010; and 

2. The following rent schedule shall apply for the Additional Space and Tenant’s Proportionate Share is increased by 1.56%: 

 

									
	 Additional Space – 5,300 SF (Pt. 4th floor)
	 
	 	  	Annual Rent	 	  	Monthly Rent	 
	 03/01/2010
	  	 	201,400,00	  	  	 	16,783.33	  
	 03/22/2010
	  	 	206,938.51	  	  	 	17,244.88	  
	 03/22/2011
	  	 	212,629.31	  	  	 	17,719,11	  
	 03/22/2012
	  	 	239,676.62	  	  	 	19,973,05	  
	 03/22/2013
	  	 	246,267.72	  	  	 	20,522.31	  
	 03/22/2014
	  	 	253,040.08	  	  	 	21,086.67	  
			
	 Article 28 is amended to increase the pro rata by 1.56%
	  				  			








 Except as expressly modified hereby, the Lease is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects
and shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	Yodle, Inc.
		
	By:	 	




		 	  

	Name:	 	Michael Gordon
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer


  

			
	 Above Agreed to and Accepted:

Matana LLC

		
	By:	 	




		 	  

		 	Name:
		 	Title:
# C_2009069EN.01001201.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/12

---

Order of the Court of 25 November 2008 — S.A.BA.R. SpA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-501/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Action for annulment - Time-limit for initiating proceedings - Starting point)

(2009/C 69/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: S.A.BA.R. SpA (represented by: E. Coffrini and F. Tesauro, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Righini and G. Conte, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal lodged against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2007 in Case T-176/07 S.A.BA.R. v Commission by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the application for annulment of the Commission decision of 5 June 2002 declaring incompatible with the common market the aid scheme (C-27/99 ex NN 69/98) provided for under Italian legislation in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding (OJ 2003 L 77, p. 21).

S.A.BA.R.

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | S.A.BA.R. SpA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

S.A.BA.R. SpA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 9.2.2008.

1

---
# C_2008171EN.01003103.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/31

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 May 2008 — NewSoft Technology v OHIM — Soft (Presto! BizCard Reader)

(Case T-205/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark Presto! BizCard Reader - Earlier national figurative marks Presto - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 171/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: NewSoft Technology Corp. (Taipei, Taiwan) (represented by: M. Dirksen-Schwanenland, U. von Sothen and M. Di Stefano, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Soft, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Velázquez Ibáñez and P. Merino Baylos, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 May 2006 (Case R 601/2005-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Soft, SA and NewSoft Technology Corp.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | NewSoft Technology Corp. is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

NewSoft Technology Corp. is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 237, 30.9.2006.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Exhibit 27.1
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,251
<INVENTORY>                                      2,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,805
<PP&E>                                         115,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,317
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           390
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,303
<SALES>                                        132,340
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,340
<CGS>                                           94,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,289
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        


</TABLE>
ex4-11.htm


 


Exhibit 4.11








PROMISSORY NOTE







 



	$20,000.00 CND	November 4th, 2009







 








FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Global Clean Energy, Inc., a Maryland corporation ("Maker") promises to pay to the order of Sylvain McMahon ("Lender"), at his principal office, or at such other place as may be designated in writing by the holders of this Promissory Note ("Note"), the principal sum of TWENTY THOUSAND 00/100 CANADIAN DOLLARS ($20,000.00 CDN) (the "Principal Sum").  The unpaid Principal Sum shall bear interest at 7.5% per annum payable annually and shall be due in twenty-four (24) months.







All payments to be made under this Note shall be payable in lawful money of the Canada which shall be legal tender for public and private debts at the time of payment.







In the event that an action is instituted to collect this Note, or any portion thereof, Maker promises to pay all costs of collection, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, and such other sums as the court may establish.







In the event of a default under this Note when due, then the holder of this Note, at its election, may declare the entire unpaid Principal Sum due and payable.







Every provision hereof is intended to be several.  If any provision of this Note is determined, by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the other provisions hereof, which shall remain binding and enforceable.







This Note is made in the Province of Quebec and it is mutually agreed that Quebec law shall apply to the interpretation of the terms and conditions of this Note.







All agreements between the holder of this Note and Maker are hereby expressly limited so that in no contingency or event what­soever, whether by reason of deferment or acceleration of the maturity of this Note or otherwise, shall the rate of interest hereunder exceed the maximum permissible under applicable law with respect to the holder.  If, from any circumstances whatsoever, the rate of interest resulting from the payment and/or accrual of any amount of interest hereunder, at any time that payment of interest is due and/or at any time that interest is accrued, shall exceed the limits prescribed by such applicable law, then the payment and/or accrual of such interest shall be reduced to that resulting from the maximum rate of interest permissible under such applicable law.  This provision shall never be superseded or waived.







The makers, endorsers, and/or guarantors of this Note do hereby severally waive presentment, demand, protest and notices of protest, demand, dishonor and nonpayment.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the date first hereinabove set forth.












                                GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY, INC.




 







                                By: (s) Kenneth Adessky                                 


                                       Kenneth Adessky,


                                       C.F.O
STATE v. MAYSONET.

No. COA08-566.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Iredell (06CRS11618, 06CRS11619, 06CRS57792, 06CRS57798, 06CRS57799, 06CRS57795, 06CRS57801).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
# Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/118Show full title

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/118 of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive            measures against Côte d'Ivoire         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/118                     

# of 26 January 2015

# implementing Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire(1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 29 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/656/CFSP.

(2)On 20 November 2014, the Sanctions Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1572 (2004)                              concerning Côte d'Ivoire deleted one person from the list of persons subject to the measures imposed by paragraphs 9 to 12                              of that Resolution.

(3)The list of persons subject to restrictive measures as set out in Annex I to Decision 2010/656/CFSP should therefore be amended                              accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Decision 2010/656/CFSP is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 26 January 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

J. Dūklavs                            

## ANNEXU.K.

The entry in Annex I to Decision 2010/656/CFSP for the following person is deleted:

Alcide DJÉDJÉ

1

OJ L 285, 30.10.2010, p. 28.
STATE v. Somchoi NOORSOB.

No. 131P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 2016.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Somchoi Noonsab, Spruce Pine, for Noorsob, Somchoi.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of April 2016 by Defendant for Appropriate Relief/Release:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."
# C_2008209EN.01005202.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/52

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 June 2008 — Leclercq v Commission

(Case T-299/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Applicant's failure to act - No need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 209/93)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sylvie Leclercq (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Joris and P. Costa de Oliveira, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, Agent)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the Commission of 27 July 2006 refusing, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, p. 43) to grant the applicant access to certain documents

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | Ms Sylvie Leclercq is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those of the Commission. The Republic of Finland shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Sylvie Leclercq is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those of the Commission. The Republic of Finland shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 3.12.2006.

1

---
AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL ZION CHURCH and Smith Chapel African Methodist Zion Church, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. William Donald PARKER, Harry Truman Parker, Thomas Parker, Jeraldine Donatien, and; Trustees of Smith Chapel Methodist Church, Defendants.

No. COA15-470.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                            9,338
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    93,370
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                      97,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                211,334
<PP&E>                                          194,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  461,017
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            82,442
<BONDS>                                           8,003
<COMMON>                                        336,737
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    461,017
<SALES>                                         499,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                499,037
<CGS>                                           329,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   453,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  38,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                     15,001
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              23,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     23,983
<EPS-BASIC>                                        1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.24



</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Edward Moers and Daniel Moers v. Harris County Appraisal District,

Chief Appraiser of Harris County Appraisal, Jim Robinson

, and Harris

Coun ty Appraisal Review Board

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00549

- CV

Trial court case number: 2009

- 55877

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

It is ordered that Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing is denied

.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddl e

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle

Date: September 3 , 2015
State of North Carolina v. Edward Roy Frye

No. COA16-362

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 1, 2016

NO ERROR IN PART; VACATE AND REMAND IN PART.
# C_2008092EN.01000901.xml

| 12.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 February 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-273/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2005/51/EC - Public procurement - Procedures for the award of contracts)

(2008/C 92/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Stromsky and D. Kukovec, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, the provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005, amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement (OJ 2005 L 257, p. 127)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005, amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005, amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.

1

---