alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 March 2008 –**

**Commission v Luxembourg**

**(Case C‐340/07)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2002/73/EC – Equal treatment for men and women – Access to employment, vocational training and promotion – Working conditions – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 6)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to take, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (OJ 2002 L 269, p. 1). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by not having adopted within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first paragraph of Article 2(1) of that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
# C_2009044EN.01004202.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/42

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 December 2008 — General Química v Commission

(Case T-85/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Rubber chemicals sector - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Exchange of confidential information and price fixing - Imputation to parent company - Joint and several liability - Fines - Leniency notice)

(2009/C 44/72)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: General Química, SA (Alava, Spain); Repsol Química, SA (Madrid, Spain); and Repsol YPF, SA (Madrid) (represented by: J.M. Jiménez Laiglesia Oñate and J. Jiménez Laiglesia Oñate, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and F. Amato, then by F. Castillo de la Torre, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2006/902/EC of 21 December 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement against Flexsys NV, Bayer AG, Crompton Manufacturing Company Inc. (former Uniroyal Chemical Company Inc.), Crompton Europe Ltd, Chemtura Corporation (former Crompton Corporation), General Química SA, Repsol Química SA and Repsol YPF SA (Case No COMP/F/C.38.443 — Rubber chemicals) (OJ 2006 L 353, p. 50), and, alternatively, the reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders General Química, SA, Repsol Química, SA and Repsol YPF, SA to bear their own costs and pay the Commission's costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders General Química, SA, Repsol Química, SA and Repsol YPF, SA to bear their own costs and pay the Commission's costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.

1

---
# C_2008142EN.01000901.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 April 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — A.O.B. Reuter & Co. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-143/07) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 - Article 11 - System of export refunds on agricultural products - Condition for the grant of the refund - Refund paid to the exporter after submission of documents forged by its contracting partner - Goods not exported - Conditions for the application of sanctions)

(2008/C 142/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A.O.B.Reuter & Co.

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a Preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Hamburg — Interpretation of Article 11(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 of 27 November 1987 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products (OJ 1987 L 351, p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2945/94 of 2 December 1994 (OJ 1994 L 310, p. 57), and of Article 51 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products (OJ 1999 L 102, p. 11) — Refund paid to an exporter after submission of documents forged by a third party — Conditions governing the application of penalties

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 of 27 November 1987 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2945/94 of 2 December 1994, must be interpreted as meaning that the sanction for which it provides is applicable against an exporter who has requested an export refund on goods, where those goods, as a result of fraudulent conduct on the part of the exporter's contracting partner, were not exported.

---

(1)  OJ C 117, 26.5.2007.

1

---
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3682 

AN ACT 

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs located at 1961 Premier 

Drive in Mankato, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Lyle C. Pearson 

Community Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3682 EH

1 SECTION 1. LYLE C. PEARSON COMMUNITY BASED OUT2 PATIENT CLINIC. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The community based outpatient 

4 clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs located at 

5 1961 Premier Drive in Mankato, Minnesota, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Lyle C. Pearson Commu7 nity Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

11 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lyle C. Pearson Commu12 nity Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3682 

AN ACT 

To designate the community based outpatient clinic 

patient Clinic’’. the ‘‘Lyle C. Pearson Community Based Out1961 Premier Drive in Mankato, Minnesota, as of the Department of Veterans Affairs located at
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,594,877
<SECURITIES>                                40,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              216,272,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                59,796,488
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           228,356,136
<PP&E>                                      46,497,830
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,358,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             577,270,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      240,434,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        49,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 143,468,497
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               577,270,277
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           440,318,613
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              313,706,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           137,201,187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (5,127,244)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (15,716,426)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (15,716,426)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (15,716,426)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                             961
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                   28,085
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                     19,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                53,904
<PP&E>                          27,454
<DEPRECIATION>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 359,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           30,476
<BONDS>                        101,586
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                             9
<OTHER-SE>                      95,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   359,332
<SALES>                        143,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               143,728
<CGS>                           85,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  108,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              19,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 10,130
<INCOME-TAX>                     5,611
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              4,519
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                     4,519
<EPS-BASIC>                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0


</TABLE>
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 8 July 2009 – Zenab v Commission**

**(Case T-33/06)**

Community financial support – Programme to encourage the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA Plus) – Call for proposals – Rejection of the proposal – Alleged unlawful delegation of powers transferred to the Commission – Manifest errors of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Access to documents – Action for annulment and for compensation

1.                     *Culture – Community Programmes – MEDIA Plus Programme (Council Decision 2000/821, Arts 8(2) and 10) (see paras 58-75, 94-128)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Pleas in law (see para. 76)*

3.                     *Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Commission decision refusing the grant of financial
assistance under a programme for encouraging the development and distribution of European audiovisual works**(Art. 253 EC) (see paras 137-155)*

4.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 162-163)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION, first, for annulment of the Commission’s Decision of 9 November 2005 with reference number 648599 and, secondly, for a finding that the European Community is non-contractually liable, for an order that the Commission should pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 37 807 as compensation for the costs incurred in the context of the call for proposals, the amount of the non-material loss because of damage to reputation and the amount of the material loss resulting from the delay in the implementation of the EuroVOD project, and for the appointment of an expert to assess that loss. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Zenab SPRL to pay the costs. |
# C_2008079EN.01000801.xml

| 29.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Angel Angelidis v European Parliament

(Case C-103/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Officials - Staff report - Single assessor - Conditions - Consultation of preceding immediate superior - Lack of change in post - Reasoning - Annulment - Damages)

(2008/C 79/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Angel Angelidis (represented by: E. Boigelot, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Mustapha Pacha and A. Lukošiūte, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 5 December 2006 in Case T-416/03 Angelidis v Parliament, in which the Court rejected the applicant's application, first, to annul his staff report for the period from 1 January to 31 December 2001 and, second, for compensation for the harm he suffered by reason both of alleged irregularities in the disputed staff report and of its allegedly late establishment

Angelidis

Parliament

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Angelidis to bear his own costs and to pay those of the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Angelidis to bear his own costs and to pay those of the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 9.6.2007.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1896]



[[Page 5452]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that, under the authority vested in me by 
the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, I have 
redelegated to the Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and 
Families, with the authority to further redelegate to the Director, 
Family Youth Services Bureau, the authority to approve/disapprove 
cooperative research or demonstration projects under Section 1110 of 
the Social Security Act, and as amended hereafter, when such projects 
pertain to the abstinence education activities referenced in Public Law 
108-447 at Title II, Division F.
    This delegation excludes the authority to submit reports to 
Congress. Further, this delegation shall be exercised under the 
Department's existing delegation and policy on regulations and under 
financial and administrative requirements applicable to all 
Administration for Children and Families authorities. In addition, 
where all or part of any research or demonstration project is wholly 
financed with Federal funds made available under section 1110 of the 
Social Security Act, without any State, local, or other non-Federal 
financial participation, that project must be approved by the Secretary 
of Health and Human Services.
    I have ratified any actions taken by the Commissioner, 
Administration on Children, Youth and Families, or any other 
Administration on Children, Youth and Families officials, which, in 
effect, involved the exercise of this authority prior to the effective 
date of this delegation. This delegation was effective on the date of 
signature.

    Dated: January 21, 2005.
Wade F. Horn,
Assistant Secretary for Children and Families.
[FR Doc. 05-1896 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial data extracted from the
 consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                          50,826
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   66,229
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     211,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                561,303
<PP&E>                          2,417,090
<DEPRECIATION>                  781,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,217,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,200,034
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1,197
<OTHER-SE>                      28,745,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,217,251
<SALES>                         114,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                114,187
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,386,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              14,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (5,281,552)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (5,281,552)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (5,281,552)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.06)
        



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 25, 2008

Before

RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 08-1172

STEVEN D. DYE, Sr., and

PATRICIA L. DYE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE

COMPANY and AUSSPRUNG &

ASSOCIATES APPRAISALS, LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

No. 07 C 430

Rudolph T. Randa,

Chief Judge.

ORDER

The order of this court released on August 15, 2008, is AMENDED as follows:

Page 2, second full paragraph, and page 3, third full

paragraph, replace “inflated appraisal” with “low

appraisal”.
Nicholas Geer, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

July 15, 2016

ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on July 6, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Letitia H. Verdin be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Verdin shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where she may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Verdin shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
Luciana Hartford, Plaintiff, v. Ron P. Hartford, Defendant.

No. COA16-413

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 1, 2016

REVERSED.
csgs-ex1025bb_227.htm



Exhibit 10.25BB

 

 

FIFTY-EIGHTH AMENDMENT

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CSG MASTER SUBSCRIBER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CSG SYSTEMS, INC.

AND

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC

 

 

This Fifty-eighth Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made by and between CSG Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CSG”), and Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Customer”).  CSG and Customer entered into that certain Amended and Restated CSG Master Subscriber Management System Agreement dated February 9, 2009 (CSG document no. 2298875), as amended (the “Agreement”), and now desire to further amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.  If the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment shall be in conflict with the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control.  Any terms in initial capital letters or all capital letters used as a defined term but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.  The effective date of this Amendment is the date last signed below (the Effective Date").  Further, upon execution of this Amendment by the parties, any subsequent reference to the Agreement between the parties shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.  Except as amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect according to their terms. 

 

 

Now, therefore, CSG and Customer agree to the following as of the Effective Date:

 

1.  The parties wish to extend the Agreement through January 31, 2015 in order to finalize terms for a longer extension and therefore Section 1.2 entitled Term shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

"1.2  Term

   Unless earlier terminated pursuant to Sections 6.1, this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and remain in effect thereafter for an initial term expiring on January 31, 2015 (“Initial Term”)." 

 

THIS AMENDMENT is executed on the day and year last signed below to be effective as of the Effective Date.

 


		
	
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC (“CUSTOMER”)

 

By: Charter Communications, Inc., its Manager
	
CSG SYSTEMS, INC. (“CSG”)

	
 

 

By: /s/ Michael Ciszek
	
 

 

By:  /s/ Randy Wiese

	
 

Title:  VP Billing  & Collections
	
 

Title:  EVP & CFO

	
 

Name:  Michael Ciszek
	
 

Name:  Randy Wiese

	
 

Date:  12/23/14
	
 

Date:  12/23/14