alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008301EN.01000602.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 September 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Efetio Athinon — Greece) — Sot. Lelos kai Sia EE (C-468/06), Farmakemporiki AE Emporias kai Dianomis Farmakeftikon Proionton (C-469/06), Konstantinos Xidias kai Sia OE (C-470/06), Farmakemporiki AE Emporias kai Dianomis Farmakeftikon Proionton (C-471/06), Ionas Stroumsas EPE (C-472/06), Ionas Stroumsas EPE (C-473/06), Farmakapothiki Farma-Group Messinias AE (C-474/06), K.P. Marinopoulos AE Emporias kai Dianomis Farmakeftikon Proionton (C-475/06), K.P. Marinopoulos AE Emporias kai Dianomis Farmakeftikon Proionton (C-476/06), Kokkoris D. Tsanas K. EPE and Others (C-477/06), Kokkoris D. Tsanas K. EPE and Others (C-478/06) v GlaxoSmithKline AEVE Farmakeftikon Proionton, formerly Glaxowellcome AEVE

(Joined Cases C-468/06 to C-478/06) (1)

1

(Article 82 EC - Abuse of dominant position - Pharmaceutical products - Refusal to supply wholesalers engaging in parallel exports - Ordinary orders)

(2008/C 301/11)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Efetio Athinon

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Sot. Lelos kai Sia EE (C-468/06), Farmakemporiki AE Emporias kai Dianomis Farmakeftikon Proionton (C-469/06), Konstantinos Xidias kai Sia OE (C-470/06), Farmakemporiki AE Emporias kai Dianomis Farmakeftikon Proionton (C-471/06), Ionas Stroumsas EPE (C-472/06), Ionas Stroumsas EPE (C-473/06), Farmakapothiki Farma-Group Messinias AE (C-474/06), K.P. Marinopoulos AE Emporias kai Dianomis Farmakeftikon Proionton (C-475/06), K.P. Marinopoulos AE Emporias kai Dianomis Farmakeftikon Proionton (C-476/06), Kokkoris D. Tsanas K. EPE and Others (C-477/06), Kokkoris D. Tsanas K. EPE and Others (C-478/06)

Applicants:

Defendant: GlaxoSmithKline AEVE Farmakeftikon Proionton

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Efetio Athinon — Interpretation of Article 82 EC — Abuse of a dominant position — Refusal of an undertaking holding a dominant position to meet fully orders placed by pharmaceutical wholesalers, with the intention of limiting their export activity and, consequently, the harm caused to it by parallel trade

Operative part of the judgment

Article 82 EC must be interpreted as meaning that an undertaking occupying a dominant position on the relevant market for medicinal products which, in order to put a stop to parallel exports carried out by certain wholesalers from one Member State to other Member States, refuses to meet ordinary orders from those wholesalers, is abusing its dominant position. It is for the national court to ascertain whether the orders are ordinary in the light of both the size of those orders in relation to the requirements of the market in the first Member State and the previous business relations between that undertaking and the wholesalers concerned.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.

1

---
# C_2009141EN.01001002.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Nocera Inferiore (Italy)) — Lodato Gennaro & C. SpA v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS), SCCI

(Case C-415/07) (1)

1

(State aid for employment - Guidelines on aid to employment - Guidelines on national regional aid - Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 - Notion of ‘job creation’ - Calculation of the increase in employment)

2009/C 141/15

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Nocera Inferiore

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lodato Gennaro & C. SpA

Applicant:

Defendants: Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS), SCCI

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale ordinario di Nocera Inferiore — Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment (OJ 2002 L 337, p. 3) — Ascertaining compliance with the requirements for obtaining aid — Ascertaining whether there has been an increase in employment — Method of calculation

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

In order to determine whether there has been an increase in employment, the guidelines on aid to employment should be interpreted as meaning that the average number of annual working units for the year preceding recruitment should be compared with the average number of annual working units for the year following such recruitment.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.

1

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Grant
King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and William C. Hitchcock, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Grant King                                    /s/ William C. Hitchcock
--------------------------------                  --------------------------
Grant King                                        William C. Hitchcock
Chief Executive Officer                           Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2007                                   August 14, 2007
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 12, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136950 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

CARL W. BROOKS, 

Plaintiff, 

v 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

 SC: 136950 

 AGC: 0161/08 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff having failed to pay the partial filing 

fee as required by the order of August 12, 2008, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed 

to close this file. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 12, 2008 

Clerk
State v. Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner

514P13-5

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016

*515Raymond Joiner, for Joiner, Raymond Dakim Harris.

Ryan Frank Haigh, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of May 2016 by Defendant to Dismiss for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 September 2008 – Commission v Italy**

**(Case C‐368/07)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2000/59/EC – Port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues – Failure to develop and implement waste reception and handling plans for all ports

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 12)*

2.                     *Acts of the institutions – Directives – Implementation by Member States – Need to ensure that directives are effective (Art.
249 EC) (see para. 16)*

3.                     *Environment – Waste – Directive 2000/59 – Ship-generated waste and cargo residues (European Parliament and Council Directive
2000/59, Arts 3(b), 5(1) and 16(1)) (see paras 17-22, operative part)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to have adopted, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (OJ 2000 L 332, p. 81). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to prepare and adopt waste reception and handling plans for every Italian port, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
James Brandon Smith, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

August 4, 2016

**110ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on July 19, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable J. Mark Hayes, II be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Hayes shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, **111and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Hayes shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
# C_2008301EN.01006304.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/63

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italian Republic v Commission

(Case T-280/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 301/116)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 2.12.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Hauppauge Digital Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 13, 2011
/s/ Kenneth PlotkinKenneth PlotkinChief Executive Officer/s/ Gerald TucciaroneGerald TucciaroneChief Financial Officer, Treasurer andSecretary
STATE v. Eddie MOORE.

No. 88P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of February 2007 by Defendant for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,743
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,030,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                 170,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 976,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        451,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     480,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   976,014
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,445
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,211
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,211
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64


</TABLE>
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3811 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 13, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To require notification of individuals of breaches of personally identifiable information through Exchanges under 

the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3811 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Exchange Secu3 rity and Transparency Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS OF BREACHES OF 

5 PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION 

6 THROUGH PPACA EXCHANGES. 

7 Not later than two business days after the discovery 

8 of a breach of security of any system maintained by an 

9 Exchange established under section 1311 or 1321 of the 

10 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 

11 18031, 18041) which is known to have resulted in person12 ally identifiable information of an individual being stolen 

13 or unlawfully accessed, the Secretary of Health and 

14 Human Services shall provide notice of such breach to 

15 each such individual. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 10, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1871]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Yakutat Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Yakutat Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Yakutat, 
Alaska. The purpose of the meeting is continue business of the Yakutat 
Resource Advisory Committee. The committee was formed to carry out the 
requirements of the Secure Rural Schools and Self-Determination Act of 
2000. The agenda for this meeting is to review submitted project 
proposals and consider recommending projects for funding. Project 
proposals are due by February 14, 2005, to be considered at this 
meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 18, 2005, from 6-9 p.m. and 
will continue on February 19, 2005, from 9-12 a.m., if necessary.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Kwaan Conference Room, 712 
Ocean Cape Drive, Yakutat, Alaska. Send written comments to Tricia 
O'Connor, c/o Forest Service, USDA, P.O. Box 327 Yakutat, AK 99689, 
(907) 784-3359 or electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4948b878b8a8a8b96a48297ca828180ca9197"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abdbc4c8c4c5c5c4d9ebcdd885cdcecf85ded8">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tricia O'Connor, District Ranger and 
Designated Federal Official, Yakutat Ranger District, (907) 784-3359.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Council 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Council members. 
However, persons who wish to bring resource projects or other Resource 
Advisory Committee matters to the attention of the Council may file 
written statements with the Council staff before or after the meeting. 
Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written 
requests by February 14, 2005, will have the opportunity to address the 
Council at those sessions.

    Dated: January 21, 2005.
Patricia M. O'Connor,
District Ranger, Yakutat Ranger District, Tongass National Forest.
[FR Doc. 05-1871 Filed 2-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# CE2004070EN.01014301.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/143 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/143

---

(2004/C 70 E/147)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2831/03

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Council

(23 September 2003)

Subject:   Statements by the Spanish Prime Minister criticising the Convention and announcing his opposition to basic aspects of the agreed Convention text

Subject:

What is the Council's position on the European Parliament resolutions calling for the agreements reached within the Convention not to be called into question? In this connection, what is the Council's position on the statements made by the Spanish Prime Minister, José María Aznar, publicly calling into question the work done by the Convention, claiming that it failed to abide by the mandate assigned to it and stating that the Intergovernmental Conference should amend basic aspects of the draft Constitution submitted to it?

Reply

(8 December 2003)

(8 December 2003)

The Council, at its meeting on 29 September 2003, took note of the opinion of the European Parliament which it had consulted in conformity with Article 48 of the Treaty on European Union.

The Council has not taken a view on any statements made by individual Member States, nor would it be appropriate for it to do so.

---
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3808 

To provide that the annual adjustment of retired pay for members of the 

Armed Forces under the age of 62 under the Bipartisan Budget Act 

of 2013 shall not apply to members retired for disability and to retired 

pay used to compute certain Survivor Benefit Plan annuities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 23, 2013 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on the 

Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that the annual adjustment of retired pay for 

members of the Armed Forces under the age of 62 

under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 shall not apply 

to members retired for disability and to retired pay used 

to compute certain Survivor Benefit Plan annuities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3808 IH

1 SECTION 1. INAPPLICABILITY OF ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT OF 

2 RETIRED PAY FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES UNDER THE AGE OF 62 UNDER THE 

4 BIPARTISAN BUDGET ACT OF 2013 TO MEM5 BERS RETIRED FOR DISABILITY AND TO RE6 TIRED PAY USED TO COMPUTE CERTAIN SUR7 VIVOR BENEFIT PLAN ANNUITIES. 

8 (a) INAPPLICABILITY.—Effective as of December 1, 

9 2015, and immediately after the coming into effect of sec10 tion 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, paragraph 

11 (4) of section 1401a(b) of title 10, United States Code, 

12 as added by section 403(a) of the Bipartisan Budget Act 

13 of 2013, is amended— 

14 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting after 

15 ‘‘age’’ the following: ‘‘(other than a member or 

16 former member retired under chapter 61 of this 

17 title)’’; and 

18 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub19 paragraph: 

20 ‘‘(F) INAPPLICABILITY TO AMOUNT OF RE21 TIRED PAY USED IN COMPUTATION OF SBP AN22 NUITY FOR SURVIVORS.—In the computation 

23 pursuant to subsection (d) or (f) of section 

24 1448 of this title of an annuity for survivors of 

25 a member or person who dies while subject to 

26 the application of this paragraph, the amount 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3808 IH

1 of the retired pay of such member or person for 

2 purposes of such computation shall be the 

3 amount of retired pay that would have been 

4 payable to such member or person at the time 

5 of death without regard to the application of 

6 this paragraph.’’. 

7 (b) EXCLUSION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS FROM

8 PAYGO SCORECARDS.— 

9 (1) STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO SCORECARDS.— 

10 The budgetary effects of this Act shall not be en11 tered on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursu12 ant to section 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go 

13 Act of 2010. 

14 (2) SENATE PAYGO SCORECARDS.—The budg15 etary effects of this Act shall not be entered on any 

16 PAYGO scorecard maintained for purposes of sec17 tion 201 of S. Con. Res. 21 (110th Congress). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS