alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18131]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Ex Parte No. 333]


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m., September 15, 2005.

PLACE: The Board's Hearing Room, Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423.

STATUS: The Board will meet to discuss among themselves the following 
agenda items. Although the conference is open for public observation, 
no public participation is permitted.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: STB Docket No. WCC-101, Government of the 
Territory of Guam v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., American President Lines, 
LTD., and Matson Navigation Company, Inc.
    STB Finance Docket No. 34505, East Brookfield & Spencer Railroad, 
LLC--Lease and Operation Exemption--CSX Transportation, Inc.
    STB Docket No. AB-441 (Sub-No. 4X), San Pedro Railroad Operating 
Company, LLC--Abandonment Exemption--in Cochise County, AZ.
    STB Docket No. AB-976X, Pittsburg & Shawmut Railroad, LLC--
Abandonment Exemption--in Armstrong and Jefferson Counties, PA.
    STB Docket No. AB-600, Yakima Interurban Lines Association--Adverse 
Abandonment--in Yakima County, WA.
    STB Finance Docket No. 34746, Kansas & Oklahoma Railroad, Inc.--
Acquisition Exemption--Rail Line of Union Pacific Railroad Company.
    STB Finance Docket No. 34694 (Sub-No. 1), Union Pacific Railroad 
Company--Temporary Trackage Rights Exemption--BNSF Railway Company.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Dennis Watson, Office of 
Congressional and Public Services, Telephone: (202) 565-1596 FIRS: 1-
800-877-8339.

    Dated: September 8, 2005.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-18131 Filed 9-8-05; 1:51 pm]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board
of Trustees

Entertainment Properties Trust:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-72021 and Form S-3 No. 333-151978 each pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Shares
Purchase Plan, Form S-8 No. 333-76625 pertaining to the 1997 Share Incentive Plan, Form S-8 No. 333-142831 and Form S-8 No. 333-159465 pertaining to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, Form S-4 No. 333-78803, as amended, pertaining to the
shelf registration of 5,000,000 common shares and Form S-3 No. 333-140978 for an undetermined amount of securities) of Entertainment Properties Trust of our reports dated February 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Entertainment Properties Trust as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2009, and all related financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Entertainment Properties Trust.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP         
|                     
|KPMG LLP             
|                     
|Kansas City, Missouri
|February 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6802

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS F. MCCOY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (2:03-cr-00197-RAJ-6; 2:07-cv-00556-RAJ)

Submitted: September 5, 2008 Decided: September 15, 2008

Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas F. McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas F. McCoy seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that McCoy has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny McCoy’s motion

for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
     I, Randy S. Leiser, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kitty Hawk,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        November 8, 2004 By:  /s/ RANDY S. LEISER    Randy S. Leiser    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54895-54896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18549]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Notice of Proposed Change to the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service's National Handbook of Conservation Practices

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Department of 
Agriculture, New York State Office.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the NRCS National 
Handbook of Conservation Practices, Section IV of the New York State 
Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS to issue one revised conservation 
practice standard in its National Handbook of Conservation Practices. 
This standard is: Wastewater Treatment Strip (NY635).

DATES: Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with 
the date of this publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquire in writing to Paul W. Webb, 
State Resource Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service 
(NRCS), 441 S. Salina Street, Fifth Floor, Suite 354, Syracuse, New 
York 13202-2450.
    A copy of this standard is available from the above individual.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agricultural 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State Technical Guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS 
will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that 
period, a determination will be made to the NRCS regarding disposition 
of those comments and final determination of change will be made.

[[Page 54896]]

    Dated: September 1, 2005.
Paul W. Webb,
State Resource Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 
Syracuse, NY.
[FR Doc. 05-18549 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
```
# C_2011013EN.01004401.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/44

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 November 2010 — Vereecken v Commission

(Case F-17/06) (1)

1

()

2011/C 13/89

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006, p. 39.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MILLENNIUM BODY ARMOR, INC.,

AND MILLENNIUM ARMOUR

CORPORATION,

 Appellants,

v.

MCCOY WEAVER WIGGINS

CLEVELAND ROSE RAY, PLLC AND

THORP, CLARKE & NEVILLE, P.A.,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00132-CV

Appeal from the

116th Judicial District Court

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# DC-06-12493)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to

TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(2). The parties represent to the Court that they have settled all matters in

controversy in the underlying suit, and are in agreement that the appeal should be dismissed. 

Further, the parties request that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice, and that the costs be

assessed against the party incurring the same. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d). After considering the

cause on the parties’ motion we conclude that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, the

appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party bear his or her own costs.

September 18, 2008

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.
Jessie Gorman, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

July 14, 2016

*701ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on May 19, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Kristi Lea Harrington be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Harrington shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where she may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Harrington shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
IN RE K.L.C.

No. COA08-189.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Brunswick (07J45T, 07J46T).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 9, 2010



|                                                |  |  |  |                                                                 
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dennis M. Oates                             |  |  |  | /s/ Douglas M. McSorley                                         
|Dennis M. Oates                                 |  |  |  | Douglas M. McSorley                                             
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                   |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         500,725
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,139,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,853,449
<PP&E>                                      12,461,229
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,316,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,470,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,529,569
<BONDS>                                     12,845,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,765
<OTHER-SE>                                   (339,778)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,470,153
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,553,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,225,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             339,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (129,957)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (59,740)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (59,740)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,740)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/2201Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/2201 of 13 November 2015 on the acceptance of third States' contributions            to the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (EUAM Ukraine/5/2015)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/2201                     

# of 13 November 2015

# on the acceptance of third States' contributions to the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform                        Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (EUAM Ukraine/5/2015)                     

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/486/CFSP of 22 July 2014 on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security                           Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine)(1),                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Decision 2014/486/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (‘PSC’) to                              take the relevant decisions on the acceptance of proposed contributions to EUAM Ukraine by third States.

(2)The Civilian Operation Commander recommended that the PSC accept the proposed contributions from Georgia to EUAM Ukraine and                              to consider the contribution as significant.

(3)Georgia should be exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUAM Ukraine,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

## Article 1U.K.Third States' contributions

1.The contribution from Georgia to EUAM Ukraine is accepted and considered to be significant.                  

2.Georgia is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUAM Ukraine.                  

## Article 2U.K.Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 13 November 2015.

*For the Political and Security Committee*                            

*The Chairperson*                            

W. Stevens                            

1

OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 42.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 10, 1999; THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 36 WEEKS ENDED JULY 10, 1999;
AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE 36 WEEKS
ENDED JULY 10, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-10-1999
<CASH>                                           4,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,069
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,220
<PP&E>                                          48,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,063
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,713
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,512
<SALES>                                        427,588
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               429,775
<CGS>                                          338,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  414,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (242)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,446
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,413
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,693
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,720
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (4,135)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,585
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>