alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54759-54760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18399]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Vestibular Research 
Center.
    Date: October 12, 2005.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sheo Singh, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, Executive Plaza South, Room 400C, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Small 
Grant Applications.
    Date: November 2, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Shiguang Yang, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDCD, NIH, 6120

[[Page 54760]]

Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 7, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18399 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
STATE v. Tae Kwon HAMMONDS.

No. 389A15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 31, 2016.

Joseph E. Elder, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hammonds, Tae Kwon.

John R. Rittelmeyer, Raleigh, for Disability Rights North Carolina, et al.

Anne Bleyman, for Disability Rights North Carolina, et al.

Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of March 2016 by Disability Rights North Carolina, North Carolina's Protection and Advocacy system, and North Carolina Advocates for Justice for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of March 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         344,972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,808,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 17,971,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,421,199
<PP&E>                                      11,695,146
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,396,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,018,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,161,541
<BONDS>                                     21,249,218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,694
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,338,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,018,174
<SALES>                                     50,135,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            50,135,323
<CGS>                                       39,468,850
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,468,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,487,085
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,606,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                632,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                   316,999
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            315,396
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   315,396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009267EN.01005302.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/53

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2009 — Transnáutica v Commission

(Case T-385/05) (1)

1

(Customs union - External Community transit operations - Consignments of tobacco and ethyl alcohol for third countries - Fraud - Claim for remission of import duties - Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Article 905 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Fairness clause - Existence of a special situation - Comprehensive guarantee)

2009/C 267/90

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Transnáutica — Transportes e Navegação SA (Matosinhos, Portugal) (represented by: C. Fernández Vicién, I. Moreno-Tapia Rivas, D. Ortigão Ramos and B. Aniceto Silva, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision REM 05/2004 of 6 July 2005 refusing the reimbursement and remission of certain customs duties.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision REM 05/2004 of 6 July 2005. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision REM 05/2004 of 6 July 2005.

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 330, of 24.12.2005.

1

---
STATE v. Anna Laura HUCKELBA.

No. 156A15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 26, 2015.

Edward Eldred, for Huckelba, Anna Laura.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of June 2015 by State of N.C. to Amend Record on Appeal:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of June 2015."
----

(2004/C 33 E/280)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2534/03

by Margrietus van den Berg (PSE) to the Commission

(29 July 2003)

Subject:   Problem of ‘cross-border pupils’

For some time Netherlands municipalities in areas on the border with Germany have had to deal with the problem of children from Dutch families who live over the border in Germany and undergo primary education in the Netherlands and vice versa. At the De Biezenkamp primary school in Beek (Ubbergen), for example, the number of pupils involved is 33 out of a total of 800. In the municipality of Losser the figure is 35 pupils and in Groesbeek 19. The municipality of Maastricht has 200 pupils from Belgium.

The municipality receives no state funding for these ‘cross-border pupils’ because the resources for primary school infrastructure are allocated on the basis of the number of children aged 0 — 19 resident in the municipality.

Very recently, on 2 June 2003, the findings of a study concerning Netherlands nationals who move to live in Germany were published — that study had been commissioned by, amongst others, the provinces of Gelderland and Overijssel and Euregio. At present, some 18 500 Netherlands citizens live in areas close to the border in Germany. Over the period from 2003 to 2007, that figure is expected to increase by between 20 000 and 40 000.

Should that increase find a direct correlation in the pupils attending, for example, De Biezenkamp primary school, then the number of ‘cross-border pupils’ is set to increase by between 30 and 60 over the period to 2007 — one more reason to resolve the problem of the related infrastructure costs.

To my mind, border regions are test cases for the new Europe. It is in precisely these regions that the benefits of European integration can be enjoyed by means of cooperation in the education sphere.

Does the Commission feel that measures should be taken to compensate municipalities for the extra costs?

Does the Commission see ways of encouraging the Member States to take such measures and, more generally, to facilitate longer-term cooperation in border regions?

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(27 August 2003)

The Commission acknowledges the concern expressed by the Honourable Member about infrastructure costs related to pupils resident in the border region of one country attending school in a neighbouring country. The promotion of pupil and student mobility is at the heart of Community policy in the field of education.

The organisation and financing of national education systems is, however, not an area of Community competence. Article 149 of the EC Treaty clearly states that: The Community shall contribute to the development of quality education by encouraging cooperation between Member States [...] while fully respecting the responsibility of the Member States for the content of teaching and the organisation of education systems'. The Commission is therefore not competent to address the issue of costs arising from such ‘cross-border pupils’.

----
JUDGMENT OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber)

22 November 2007

Case F-67/05

**Christos Michail**

**v**

**Commission of the European Communities**

(Civil service – Officials – Appraisal – Career development report – 2003 appraisal – Action for annulment – Action for damages)

**Application:**brought under Articles 236 EC and 152 EA, in which Mr Michail seeks annulment of his career development report for the period
from 1 April to 31 December 2003, annulment of the decision of 15 April 2005 rejecting his complaint against the 2003 career
development report, and an order for the Commission to pay him compensation of EUR 90 000 for the non-material harm he alleges
he has suffered.

**Held:**The applicant’s career development report for the period from 1 April to 31 December 2003 is annulled. The remainder of the
application is dismissed. The Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

**Summary**

*Officials – Reports procedure – Career development report*

*(Staff Regulations, Art. 43)*

Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and Article 1(2) of the General Provisions for Implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations,
adopted by the Commission, must be interpreted as preventing the administration from awarding a merit mark to an official
who has not been entrusted with any duties. While the award of a mark intended to evaluate an official’s achievements and
individual performance in the light of the results to be attained is an obligation where the official has been assigned particular
duties, it is not, by contrast, appropriate to make such an award where the official concerned has not been entrusted with
any duty capable of being assessed. Consequently, where the official reported on, although working, has not been entrusted
with any duty capable of being assessed during the reference period, the career development report must be annulled. That
annulment means that the administration must seek a suitable way of mitigating the absence of a merit mark, by awarding an
appropriate number of points.

(see paras 30-31, 33-34)
# C_2008313EN.01002801.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/28

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 October 2008 — Le Canne v Commission

(Case T-375/05) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Community financial assistance - Financial irregularity vitiating the request for payment of the balance - Decision to reduce the assistance - Expiry of the limitation period - Action for annulment and damages)

(2008/C 313/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Azienda Agricola ‘Le Canne’ Srl (Rovigo, Italy) (represented by: G. Carraro and F. Mazzonetto, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga and L. Visaggio, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Application to annul Decision C(2005) 2939 of 26 July 2005 reducing the outstanding balance of Community financial assistance granted to the application for the modernisation and renovation of its fish farm facilities and an application for compensation for harm arising from that reduction.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2005) 2939 of 26 July 2005 in so far as it reduces the Community financial assistance granted to Azienda Agricola ‘Le Canne’ Srl for project IT/0016/90/02 on account of the imputation to the eligible expenditure to that assistance of the profit made by Giradello SpA for the performance of works related to that project.; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2005) 2939 of 26 July 2005 in so far as it reduces the Community financial assistance granted to Azienda Agricola ‘Le Canne’ Srl for project IT/0016/90/02 on account of the imputation to the eligible expenditure to that assistance of the profit made by Giradello SpA for the performance of works related to that project.;

| 2. | Dismisses the action for damages |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action for damages

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.

1

---
State v. Bernard George Lamp, Jr.

222A14-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Anne M. Gomez, Kathleen M. Joyce, Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defenders, G. Glenn Gerding, Attorney at Law, For Lamp, Bernard George (Jr.).

Robert C. Montgomery, Amy Kunstling Irene, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of April 2016 by Defendant to File Juror Questionnaires Under Seal:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
Ernest James NICHOLS v. Richard TERRY, Superintendent-Craggy Correctional Center; Frank L. Perry, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety.

No. 296P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Ernest James Nichols, for Nichols, Ernest James.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Terry, Richard, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 20th of August 2015 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
# C_2009256EN.01002102.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 September 2009 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-211/05) (1)

1

(State aid - Aid scheme implemented by the Italian authorities in favour of newly listed companies - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Obligation to state reasons - Selective nature - Effect on trade between Member States - Adverse effect on competition)

2009/C 256/36

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented initially by I. Braguglia, subsequently by R. Adam and lastly by I. Bruni, acting as Agents, and P. Gentili, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/261/EC of 16 March 2005 on aid scheme C 8/2004 (ex NN 164/2003) implemented by Italy in favour of newly listed companies (OJ 2006 L 94, p. 42).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 23.7.2005.

1

---
# C_2008301EN.01006305.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/63

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-290/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 301/117)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 310, 16.12.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Trans Energy,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2006,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lisa A.
Corbitt,  Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/   LISA A. CORBITT
------------------------------
Lisa A. Corbitt
Principal Accounting Officer
 March 26, 2007

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2027Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/2027 of 10 November 2015 appointing a Swedish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2027                     

# of 10 November 2015

# appointing a Swedish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Swedish Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116(1), (EU) 2015/190(2) and (EU) 2015/994(3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January                              2020.

(2)An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr                              Rolf SÄLLRYD,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as an alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current                     term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:                  
          -  Ms Birgitta SACRÉDEUS, *Ledamot i regionfullmäktige, Dalarnas läns landsting*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

P. Gramegna                            

1

OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.                           

2

OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.                           

3

OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

PHILLIP FOXX,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 158 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2009



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2009