alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 22 March 2007 – Brinkmann v OHIM – Terra Networks (Terranus)**

**(Case T‐322/05)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community work mark Terranus – Earlier Community and national figurative mark terra – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similar goods and services – Art. 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 36-39, 41)

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 June 2005 (Case R 1145/2004-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Terra Networks, SA and Carsten Brinkmann. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Carsten Brinkmann |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark Terranus for goods and services in class 36 – Application No 2061968 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Terra Networks, SA |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Figurative brand terra for goods and services in class 36 (Community mark No 1332691, as well as Spanish mark No 2261483) |
| Decision by the Opposition Division: | Application dismissed |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Board of Directors
Radica Games Limited

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
33-86960,  333-07000 and 333-59737 on Form S-8, and  Registration  Statement No.
333-07526  and 333-79005 on Form F-3 of Radica Games Limited of our report dated
February 10, 2000,  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Radica Games
Limited for the year ended December 31, 1999.


/S/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

HONG KONG

April 10, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JAN 23, 1999; THE CONDENSED 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 12 WEEKS ENDED JAN 23, 1999; AND 
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE 12 WEEKS ENDED 
JAN 23, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-23-1999
<CASH>                                            5011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    79752
<ALLOWANCES>                                       786
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                125185
<PP&E>                                           46188
<DEPRECIATION>                                   23338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  193056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            67857
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                       69833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    193056
<SALES>                                         136415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                137082
<CGS>                                           108344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   132701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (83)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3900
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2340
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CKE Restaurants, Inc.: We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-83666, 333-76884,
333-41266, 333-83621, 333-83601, 333-76377, 333-51103, 333-52633, 333-62421, 33-56313, 33-55337,
333-12399, 33-53089-01, 2-86142-01, 33-31190-01, 333-12401, 333-75880, 333-27921, 333-14349,
333-05305, 33-52523, 33-52519 and 33-111284) of CKE Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries of our
report dated March 26, 2004, except as to Note 2 and the fourth paragraph of Note 13, which are as
of December 15, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CKE Restaurants, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of January 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended January 31, 2004, which report appears in the January 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
of CKE Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries. As discussed in note 2 of the notes to consolidated financial statements, the consolidated
financial statements for all periods presented have been restated. Our report refers to the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142,Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 146,Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, during the first and fourth quarters of fiscal
2003, respectively. /s/ KPMG LLP
 Orange County, California
December 15, 2004
# C_2008223EN.01001502.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 July 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-307/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 89/48/EEC - Recognition of diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration - Failure to recognise diplomas which give access to the profession of pharmacist specialising in medical biology - Failure to transpose)

(2008/C 223/24)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and P. Andrade, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Fernandes, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to transpose Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration (OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16) in relation to the profession of pharmacist specialising in medical biology

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to transpose Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration, as amended by Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 May 2001, in relation to the profession of pharmacist specialising in medical biology, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to transpose Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration, as amended by Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 May 2001, in relation to the profession of pharmacist specialising in medical biology, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 199, of 25.8.2007.

1

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00390-CR

Robert Sanchez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-05-900262, HONORABLE CHARLES F. BAIRD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The reporter’s record has not been filed and is overdue. The court reporter

has informed the Court that no arrangement for payment has been made. See Tex. R. App. P.

35.3(b)(3). Appellant is represented on appeal by the same retained lawyer who represented him at

trial. Counsel, who states that he is “helping with the appeal pro bono,” has informed the Court by

letter that appellant has been unable to raise “several thousand dollars to cover the cost of the

record.” No request for a free record has been filed and no finding of indigency has been made. See

Tex. R. App. P. 20.2.

To avoid further delays and protect the rights of the parties, the appeal is abated and

the trial court is instructed to determine, following a hearing if necessary, whether appellant is

presently indigent. If the court finds that appellant is indigent, it shall order the preparation of

the reporter’s record at no cost to appellant. Copies of all findings, conclusions, orders, and a
2

transcription of the reporter’s notes, if a hearing is held, shall be tendered for filing in this Court no

later than October 3, 2008.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Abated

Filed: August 28, 2008

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 99.8
 CONSENT OF STEPHANE BLAIS
   1.
    
    The technical report dated March 14, 2011, as amended March 30, 2011, entitled Red Lake Gold Operation, Ontario,
Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Red Lake Report); and2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information
relating to the Red Lake Report and the Red Lake Gold Mines, and the properties described
therein.
  Date: March 31, 2011/s/ Stephane BlaisName:
    Stephane Blais, P. Eng.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO 

RODERICK MORRISON, )

 ) No. 08-13-00319-CR

Appellant, )

 ) Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 6

vs. )

 ) of Dallas County, Texas 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, )

 ) (TC# F-11-56210-X)

State. )

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was originally due 

November 18, 2013. No reporter’s record having been filed the Court extending the due date 

until December 8, 2013. As of this date, the reporter’s record has not been filed.

It is therefore ORDERED that the trial judge conduct a hearing to determine whether 

appellant has been deprived of a reporter’s record for any reason, including ineffective assistance 

of counsel, and to make appropriate findings and recommendations, which may include 

appointment of new counsel. The record of such hearing, including any orders and findings of 

the trial judge, shall be certified and forwarded to this office on or before January 18, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of December, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
YAMMY'S SAUCES, INC., Plaintiff, v. PACKO BOTTLING, INC., Defendant.

No. COA15-898.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. William Miller BAKER

No. 35PA16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016.

Brendan O'Donnell, Attorney at Law, For Baker, William Miller.

David Gordon, Assistant Attorney General, Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

Jennifer Harjo, Attorney at Law, Wilmington.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th of February 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of February 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

*3Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                             881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      381
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,262
<PP&E>                                             854
<DEPRECIATION>                                     271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                         303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,052
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,040
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    178
<INCOME-TAX>                                        72
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                106
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       106
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 7 May 2009 – NHL Enterprises v OHIM – Glory & Pompea (LA KINGS)**

**(Case T-414/05)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community figurative mark LA KINGS – Earlier national figurative mark KING – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 24, 35, 51, 57-58, 75-77)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 July 2005 (Case R 371/2003-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Glory & Pompea, SA and NHL Enterprises BV. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | NHL Enterprises BV |
| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark LA KINGS for goods in Classes 16, 25 and 41 – Application No 1041102 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Manufacturas Antonio Gassol SA. The mark cited in the opposition was later assigned to Glory & Pompea, SA |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | National figurative mark KING for goods in Class 25 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld for all the goods applied for in Class 25 |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | | | | Appeal dismissed | |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 July 2005 (Case R 371/2003-4); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders OHIM to pay its own costs and those incurred by NHL Enterprises BV. |
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136909 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136909 

 COA: 285335 

Calhoun CC: 07-001111-FH 

TAYA JONETTE PALMER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 13.2


CERTIFICATION


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, the undersigned  officer of Radica
Games Limited (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report
on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Dated:  March 24, 2005                  /s/ David C.W. Howell
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Name: David C.W. Howell
                                       Title: President Asia Operations
                                              and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Chadwick FLEMING.

No. COA16-43.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 17, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Error.
State of North Carolina v. James Miller Goode

No. COA16-83

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

NO ERROR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>           BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of Maxcor Financial Group Inc. at
and as of March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                  16,697,601
<RECEIVABLES>                           20,901,222
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                              0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                            0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                      2,935,441
<PP&E>                                   6,945,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          66,552,055
<SHORT-TERM>                             1,232,984
<PAYABLES>                                       0
<REPOS-SOLD>                                     0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                               0
<LONG-TERM>                              2,003,691
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    2,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    11,392
<OTHER-SE>                              29,604,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            66,552,055
<TRADING-REVENUE>                            7,325
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                       421,713
<COMMISSIONS>                           40,634,023
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         138,807
<COMPENSATION>                          29,771,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          3,587,546
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>               2,263,335
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             2,263,335
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.26



</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136286 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136286 

 COA: 283880 

Alcona CC: 02-010915-FC 

HAROLD JOHN BROOKS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

 KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Houlihan, 480 Mich 1165 (2008). 

d0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk