alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, each of the undersigned officers of Maxcor Financial Group Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("registrant"), does hereby certify to the best of such
officer's knowledge, that:

         1. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2003 (the "FORM 10-Q") of the registrant fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.

Dated:  August 11, 2003                     /s/  GILBERT D. SCHARF
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gilbert D. Scharf
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 11, 2003                     /s/  STEVEN R. VIGLIOTTI
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Steven R. Vigliotti
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                               Page 33 of 33 Pages
STATE of North Carolina v. Billy Lee HARRELL Jr., Defendant.

No. COA 15-550.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Dec. 1, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kerri Lynn HICKS, Defendant.

No. COA15-970.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
# C_2009233EN.01002104.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/21

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 July 2009 — Studio Bichara and Others v Commission

(Case T-86/06) (1)

1

2009/C 233/41

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPIInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, O. Joe Caldarelli, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

/s/ O. Joe Caldarelli

O. Joe CaldarelliChief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2007

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,349
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,133
<PP&E>                                          11,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,482)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,234
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,826
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,847
<SALES>                                         52,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,657
<CGS>                                           36,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,529
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,369)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,840)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.70)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008272EN.01002201.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/22

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 — Evropaïki Dinamiki v Court of Justice

(Case T-272/06) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Community tendering procedure - Rejection of bid - Selection and award criteria - Obligation to state reasons)

(2008/C 272/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dinamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens (Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities (represented: initially by M. Schauss and then by D. Guild, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice of 20 July 2006 not to accept the tender submitted by the applicant in response to the call for tenders of 5 July 2005 for services to maintain, develop and support computer applications, and to award the contract to the successful tenderer.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Court of Justice to reject the tender submitted by Evropaïki Dinamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE, as communicated to the latter by letter of 20 July 2006. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Court of Justice to reject the tender submitted by Evropaïki Dinamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE, as communicated to the latter by letter of 20 July 2006.

| 2. | Orders the Court of Justice to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Court of Justice to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 2.12.2006.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BE REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         106,065
<SECURITIES>                                    29,297
<RECEIVABLES>                                  209,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               367,323
<PP&E>                                         223,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 708,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          214,666
<BONDS>                                        148,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           363
<OTHER-SE>                                     318,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   708,566
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               374,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  334,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (3,145)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,986
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,342
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,342
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33


</TABLE>
# C_2008022EN.01001302.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 November 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-6/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/74/EC - Protection of workers - Insolvency of employer)

(2008/C 22/25)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt within the prescribed period the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/74/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002, amending Council Directive 80/987/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer (OJ 2002 L 270, p. 10)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/74/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002, amending Council Directive 80/987/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/74/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002, amending Council Directive 80/987/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 56 of 10.3.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            COMPUTATION  OF PER SHARE INCOME  (LOSS)
                 (US  dollars in  thousands,  except  share and per share data)

                                                     Year ended      Year ended        Year ended
                                                     December 31,     December 31,     December 31,
                                                        2002             2001              2000
                                                        ----             -----             ----

<S>                                                 <C>              <C>               <C>
Basic income (loss) per share:
     Net income (loss)                              $     11,934     $     (4,374)     $    (18,099)
                                                    ============     ============      ============

     Weighted average number of
          shares                                      17,725,879       17,611,886        17,608,167
                                                    ------------     ------------      ------------


     Basic income (loss) per share                  $       0.67     $      (0.25)     $      (1.03)
                                                    ============     ============      ============


Diluted income (loss) per share:

     Net income (loss)                              $     11,934     $     (4,374)     $    (18,099)
                                                    ============     ============      ============


    Weighted average number of shares                 17,725,879       17,611,886        17,608,167
                                                    ------------     ------------      ------------

    Assuming conversion of stock options
        under Stock Option Plan                          609,948             --                --
                                                    ------------     ------------      ------------

    Adjusted weighted average number of  shares       18,335,827       17,611,886        17,608,167
                                                    ------------     ------------      ------------

    Diluted income (loss) per share                 $       0.65     $      (0.25)     $      (1.03)

</TABLE>
# C_2008022EN.01004202.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/42

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 December 2007 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-308/05) (1)

1

(Structural funds - Co-financing - Regulations (EC) No 1260/1999 and (EC) No 448/2004 - Conditions concerning the eligibility of payments on account made by national bodies within the framework of State aid schemes - Proof of use of the funds by the final beneficiary - Actions for annulment - Challengeable act)

(2008/C 22/78)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: initially by A. Cingolo, and subsequently by P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Flynn and M. Velardo, Agents, assisted by G. Faedo, avocat)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission decisions allegedly contained in Commission letters No 5272 of 7 June 2005, No 5453 of 8 June 2005, Nos 5726 and 5728 of 17 June 2005 and No 5952 of 23 June 2005.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 257, 15.10.2005.

1

---
NUMBER 13-07-00508-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

RUDOLPH OLIVA HERRERA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 275th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Rudolph Oliva Herrera, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion

to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having
2

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 21st day of August, 2008.
----

(2004/C 65 E/246)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2841/03

by Ria Oomen-Ruijten (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(25 September 2003)

Subject:   Social assistance benefit and right of residence

A problem has arisen with a German family residing in the Netherlands which consists of a single (divorced) mother aged 50 and three children aged 14, 18 and 19. The 19-year-old daughter has a child who has both Netherlands and German nationality. The family has lived in the Netherlands for 5 years. The mother worked in Germany for more than eight years as a frontier worker, after which she was made redundant. She receives Dutch unemployment benefit pursuant to Article 71(1)(a)(ii) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1). This benefit is to be terminated very shortly. During her period of unemployment the family has been entitled to Dutch child benefit and social benefits such as rent subsidy, financial assistance to students, etc. The mother's residence permit, which she renewed after she had become redundant, states that she is an ‘economically inactive Community citizen’ and that ‘the right of residence will lapse in the event of any claim being made on public funds’. The Dutch aliens police consider that when the statutory unemployment benefit lapses she will have no entitlement to social assistance benefit in the Netherlands. However, there will be such an entitlement if the mother and oldest daughter apply for a permanent residence permit under the domestic law of the Netherlands. The fee for such a permit is EUR 511 per person (or, for newly arrived EU citizens, EUR 890).

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(30 October 2003)

----

(1)OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2.

(2)OJ L 142, 30.6.1970, p. 24.

(3)OJ L 257, 19.10.1968, p. 2.

(4)OJ L 180, 13.7.1990.

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60654

Summary Calendar

RAMON ROMERO FELIX

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A34 691 212

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ramon Romero Felix petitions this court for review of an order from the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA affirmed the Immigration Judge’s

decision granting the respondent’s motion to pretermit Felix’s request for a

waiver of removal pursuant to former INA § 212(c) and ordering Felix removed

from the United States. Felix contends that the BIA erred by determining that

he was ineligible for relief pursuant to § 212(c). Specifically, he avers that he is

entitled to § 212(c) relief because his sexual contact of a minor offense is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 26, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-60654

2

comparable to a crime involving moral turpitude. Felix’s arguments in support

of his petition for review are foreclosed by our precedents. See Vo v. Gonzales,

482 F.3d 363 (5th Cir. 2007); Avilez-Granados v. Gonzales, 481 F.3d 869, 871-72

(5th Cir. 2007). Felix’s petition for review is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ultradata
Systems Incorporated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided Ultradata Systems, Incorporated and will be retained by Ultradata
Systems, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

November 12, 2004                          /s/  Monte Ross
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Monte Ross
                                           (Chief executive officer)

                                           /s/ Ernest S. Clarke
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Ernest S. Clarke
                                           (President and Chief financial
                                            officer)
Exhibit 99.13

CONSENT OF TONY BRISSON

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp
Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and/or documents:



|1. | The technical report that has an effective date of January 26, 2014, entitled Éléonore Gold Project Québec, Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Éléonore
Report); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Éléonore Report and the Éléonore Project, and the properties described therein.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF
into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376, 333-181116 and 333-188805 on Form S-8 of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2014



/s/ Tony BrissonName: Tony Brisson, P.Geo.
Porshia Faye DIAL (as Personal Representative of the Estate of Sallie Mae Dial, deceased), Plaintiff, v. BRITTHAVEN, INC. (dba "Highland Acres Nursing and Rehabilitation Center" and "Linkhaw Place" and as a separate entity); Maple LTC Group, LLC (aka/dba "Maple LTC Group" and "Highland Acres Nursing and Rehabilitation Center"); Principle Long Term Care, Inc. (a/k/a Principle LTC, Inc.); and Principle IT Services, Inc., Defendants.

No. COA15-753.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 2, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
Dallow v. Dallow.

S16A1354

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: September 12, 2016

Terrance C. Sullivan, Insley & Race, LLC, 181 14th Street, NE, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30309, Amy E. Hutchens, 22482 Wilderness Acres Circle, Leesburg, Virginia 20175, for Appellant.

Todd Adam Orston, Joann Brown-Williams, Meriwether & Tharp, LLC, 11475 Great Oaks Way, Suite 125, Alpharetta, Georgia 30022, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

Affirmed without opinion .

All the Justices concur.