alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1830]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
Clinical Trials Review Committee.
    Date: February 28-March 2, 2005.
    Time: 8 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Sheraton Inner Harbor Hotel, 300 South Charles Street, 
Baltimore, MD 21201.
    Contact Person: Patricia A Haggerty, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Affairs, 
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 7194, MSC 7924, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/435-0288, 
haggerp--nhlbi.nih.gov.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-1830 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2010288EN.01002802.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Deltafina v Commission

(Case T-29/05) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Consistency between the statement of objections and the contested decision - Rights of the defence - Definition of the relevant market - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Aggravating circumstances - Role as leader - Cooperation)

(2010/C 288/53)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Deltafina SpA (Orvieto, Italy) (represented by: R. Jacchia, A. Terranova, I. Picciano, F. Ferraro, J.-F. Bellis and F. Di Gianni, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, É. Gippini Fournier and F. Amato and, subsequently, É. Gippini Fournier and V. Di Bucci, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 4030 final of 20 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/C.38.238.B.2 — Raw tobacco — Spain) and, in the alternative, a reduction in the fine imposed on the applicant in the decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Deltafina SpA by Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2004) 4030 final of 20 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) [EC] (Case COMP/C.38.238/B.2 — Raw tobacco — Spain) at EUR 6 120 000. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Deltafina SpA by Article 3 of Commission Decision C(2004) 4030 final of 20 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) [EC] (Case COMP/C.38.238/B.2 — Raw tobacco — Spain) at EUR 6 120 000.

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder.

| 3. | Orders Deltafina to bear three quarters of its own costs and pay three quarters of the costs incurred by the Commission and the Commission to bear one quarter of its own costs and pay one quarter of those incurred by Deltafina. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Deltafina to bear three quarters of its own costs and pay three quarters of the costs incurred by the Commission and the Commission to bear one quarter of its own costs and pay one quarter of those incurred by Deltafina.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 06-2216

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellant,

v.

TALMUS R. TAYLOR,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on July 9, 2008, is amended

as follows:

On page 3, line 19: "discretionary" should be "deferential"
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-11082

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES MICHAEL LAWRENCE, a/k/a

Mike Lawrence, a/k/a Mitchell Lawrence,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-CR-326-3

_________________________________________________________________

May 18, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Michael Lawrence has appealed the sentence imposed by

the district court following entry of his guilty plea to count 1 of

an indictment charging him with conspiracy to possess with intent

to distribute methamphetamine. Lawrence contends that the district

court erred in determining that he was a manager or supervisor in

the conspiracy and in imposing a 3-level increase in offense level

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.a(b). Because Lawrence did not object
-2-

to the district court to the upward adjustment, we review this

issue for plain error. See United States v. Mitchell, 31 F.3d 271,

278 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court’s finding as to Lawrence’s

role in the offense was not plainly erroneous. See id. Lawrence

contends that he was entitled to a reduction in offense level under

the “Safety Valve” provision of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. Lawrence

concedes that this provision does not apply to defendants who are

found to be managers or supervisors under § 3B1.1. Lawrence

contends that the government failed to prove that the conspiracy

dealt in d-Methamphetamine, as opposed to 1-Methamphetamine, which

is less severely punished under the guidelines. See United States

v. O’Bryant, 136 F.3d 980, 981-82 (5th Cir. 1998). The district

court’s implicit finding that the conspiracy was dealing in

d-Methamphetamine was not clearly erroneous. The judgment is

A F F I R M E D.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2008 – Commission v Environmental Management Consultants**

**(Case T-46/05)**

Arbitration clause – Reimbursement of amounts paid – Default interest – Default procedure

Procedure – Referral to the Court of First Instance under an arbitration clause (Art. 238 EC) (see paras 29-34, 41-50)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought by the Commission pursuant to Article 238 EC seeking to obtain reimbursement in the sum of EUR 31 965.28 which it paid in the context of the performance of contract IC18-CT98-0273, plus statutory interest. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Orders Environmental Management Consultants Ltd to repay to the Commission of the European Communities the amount of EUR 31 965.28, plus interest: |

–        at the rate of 9.26% per annum from 1 to 31 August 2001;

–        at the rate of 8.62% per annum from 1 September to 31 December 2001;

–        at the rate of 10.57% per annum from 1 January to 30 June 2002;

–        at the rate of 10.47% per annum from 1 July to 31 December 2002;

–        at the rate of 9.97% per annum from 1 January to 30 June 2003;

–        at the rate of 9.22% per annum from 1 July to 31 December 2003;

–        at the rate of 9.14% per annum from 1 January to 30 June 2004;

–        at the rate of 9.13% per annum from 1 July to 31 December 2004;

–        at the rate of 9.21% per annum from 1 January to 31 January 2005;

–        at the statutory rate, calculated in accordance with Article 288 of the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (German Civil Code) without
that rate exceeding 9.21% from 1 February 2005 until the discharge of the debt;

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Environmental Management Consultants to pay the costs. |
STATE of North Carolina v. Calvin Demetrius THOMPSON, Defendant.

No. COA15-4.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 15, 2015. Mandate October 5, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136604 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. LEONARD LAMAR BROWN, Stephen J. Markman, Petitioner-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 136604 

 COA: 281710 

Wayne CC: 2006-627053-AA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

and PAROLE BOARD,

Respondent-Appellees.
 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 10.3.8

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Employment Agreement ("Agreement") deemed effective as of January 14, 2002 is entered into by and among Westaff Support, Inc., a California
corporation (the "Company"), its ultimate parent company known as Westaff, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Westaff"), and Dwight S. Pedersen (the "Executive"). The parties agree to the following
terms and conditions of the Executive's employment.

1.    EMPLOYMENT.The Company hereby employs the Executive, and the Executive hereby accepts such employment, upon
the terms and subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth.

2.    DUTIES.



3.    COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS.In consideration for the services of the Executive, the Company shall compensate
the Executive as follows:



---



2

---



4.    TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT.



5.    TERMINATION OBLIGATIONS.



3

---



6.    PROPRIETARY INFORMATION AND NON-SOLICITATION.



4

---



7.    GENERAL.



5

---



The
parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written.

|EXECUTIVE:                             
|---------------------------------------
|/s/DWIGHT S. PEDERSENDwight S. Pedersen
|COMPANY:
WESTAFF SUPPORT, INC.         
|By:                                    
|                                       
|Title:                                 
|WESTAFF:
WESTAFF, INC.                 
|By:                                    
|                                       
|Title:                                 

6

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11





                               ELECTROSCOPE, INC.


               COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE 

                           AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)



                                                   For the Three Months Ended 
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                  June 30, 1997   June 30, 1996
                                                 --------------- ---------------

NET INCOME (LOSS)                                $ (1,045,877)     $   (345,317)
                                                 ------------      ------------
                                                 ------------      ------------
SHARES USED IN SHARE COMPUTATION                                  
   Common stock shares outstanding                                
   (weighted average)                               5,374,950         3,965,082
                                                                  
                                                                  
   Treasury stock effect of common stock and                      
      equivalents issued within one year of the                   
      public offering at prices less than the                     
      public offering price                               ---           245,735
                                                 ------------      ------------
         Shares used in computation                 5,374,950         4,210,817
                                                 ------------      ------------
                                                 ------------      ------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE AND                            
   COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE                             $(0.19)           $(0.08)
                                                 ------------      ------------
                                                 ------------      ------------


                                       19
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3671 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the eligibility for a medallion furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to signify the veteran 

status of a deceased individual. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 5, 2013 

Mr. MILLER of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the eligibility for a medallion furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to signify the veteran status of a deceased 

individual. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDALLIONS. 

4 Section 2306(d)(4) of title 38, United States Code, 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following sentence: 

6 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec7 retary may furnish a medallion or other device under this 

8 paragraph regardless of the date of the death of the indiVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:05 Dec 07, 2013 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3671.IH H3671

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3671 IH

1 vidual for whom the medallion or other device is fur2 nished.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Philip PARKER, Plaintiff, v. ARCARO DRIVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Defendant.

No. COA15-530.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Dec. 1, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Dismissed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00453-CR

John Melton, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 97-921-K26, HONORABLE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In September 1998, John Melton pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and was placed

on deferred adjudication supervision for ten years. On April 22, 2003, the trial court found that

Melton had violated conditions of his supervision, adjudged him guilty, and imposed a fifteen-year

prison sentence. On July 7, 2008, Melton filed a pro se notice of appeal.

The notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). Under the

circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by

dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998);

Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
2

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 21, 2008

Do Not Publish
STATE v. James Allen COOK.

No. 272P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Karen A. Blum, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.

*855James Allen Cook, Bunn, for Cook, James Allen.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of August 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
----

(2004/C 33 E/177)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1829/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(2 June 2003)

Subject:   Letters to the Greek Government concerning the use of Community funds and the compliance with EU legislation

Can the Commission say how many letters have been sent to the Greek Government since 1994 and from whom (Commissioners, directors-general or heads of division) concerning the proper use of Community funds for environmental protection purposes and the transposition and proper implementation of Community environmental legislation?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2003)

In accordance with the role assigned to it by Article 155 of the EC Treaty, the Commission maintains regular and abundant correspondence with the national authorities on the implementation and appropriate use of EU funds granted to projects contributing to environmental objectives and on the correct application of EU environmental legislation. The number of letters sent in each case depends on a number of factors.

For instance, the investigation of a complaint concerning the application of EU environmental law may comprise several stages involving the dispatch of many successive letters.

When the Commission considers that there is an infringement, it may initiate the procedure provided for by Article 226 of the EC Treaty which may lead to the matter being brought before the Court of Justice, preceded by the dispatch of a letter of formal notice and of a reasoned opinion.

However, it is materially and technically impossible to produce statistics showing the total number of letters which the Commission has sent to the Greek authorities since 1994. However, it is possible to produce general statistics on the number of complaints or infringements relating to transposition and application of EU environmental legislation in Greece.

----
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 411 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide credit rate parity 

for all renewable resources under the electricity production credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2007 

Mr. SMITH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

credit rate parity for all renewable resources under the 

electricity production credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CREDIT RATE PARITY FOR ALL RENEWABLE 

4 RESOURCES UNDER ELECTRICITY PRODUC5 TION CREDIT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 45(b)(4)(A) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to credit rate) is 

8 amended by inserting ‘‘and before 2007’’ after ‘‘2003’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 411 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to electricity produced and sold 

3 after December 31, 2006. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
# C_2009282EN.01003502.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/35

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 September 2009 — Arkema v Commission

(Case T-168/05) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for Monochloroacetic acid - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Market sharing and price fixing - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Principle that penalties must fit the offence - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Fines - Proportionality - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Deterrent effect - Actual impact on the market - Attenuating circumstances - Role of follower - Aggravating circumstances - Repeated infringement)

2009/C 282/65

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Arkema SA (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Debroux, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented: initially by A. Bouquet and F. Amato, then A. Bouquet and X. Lewis, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Primarily, annul Article 1(d), Article 2(c) and Article 4(9) of Commission Decision C(2004) 4876 final of 19 January 2005 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/ E-1/37.773 — MCAA) and, in the alternative, request to amend Article 2 (c) and (d) of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Arkema SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Arkema SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, of 9.7.2005.

1

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-91026, 333-16553, 333-03603, 333-40493, 333-60797 and
333-75183) and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-19009,
333-28919, 333-38181, 333-40497, 333-48403 and 333-65743) of our report dated
January 26, 1998, except for Note 3, as to which the date is January 25, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Quintiles Transnational Corp. for the year ended December
31, 1998.




                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Raleigh, North Carolina
March 30, 1999