alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lisa A. Corbitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/ JOHN S. TUMIS                          
|John S. Tumis                              
|Chief Financial Officer 
September 26, 2013

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Companys Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
   CERTIFICATION OF SCOTT H. RECHLER, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRESIDENT OF
  RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP., THE SOLE GENERAL PARTNER OF THE REGISTRANT,
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Scott H. Rechler, Chief Executive Officer and President of Reckson Associates
Realty Corp., the sole general partner of Reckson  Operating  Partnership,  L.P.
(the "Company"),  certify pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

          1)   The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  of the  Company  for  the
               quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2004 (the "Report")  fully
               complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

          2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


Dated: November 2, 2004

                                   By          /s/ Scott H. Rechler
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Scott H. Rechler, Chief Executive Officer
                                      and President of Reckson Associates
                                      Realty Corp., the sole general partner
                                      of the Registrant


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reckson  Operating  Partnership,  L.P.  and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          74,479
<SECURITIES>                                    37,623
<RECEIVABLES>                                  195,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,046
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               320,519
<PP&E>                                         182,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 554,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          220,747
<BONDS>                                        171,346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           701
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   554,737
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               601,126
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  557,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,894
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,879
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,879
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008285EN.01003701.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/37

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2008 — Chassagne v Commission

(Case T-253/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Officials - Payment of Annual travel expenses - Official originating from a French Overseas Department (DOM) - Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Confirmatory Act - Pay slip - Distortion of the facts - Error of law)

(2008/C 285/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Olivier Chassagne (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially, S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanx, subsequently, T. Bontinck, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid, V. Joris, Agents, and F. Longfils, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2006 in Case F-11/05 Chassagne v Commission [2006] ECR-SC I-A-65 and II-241) and seeking annulment of that order.

Chassagne

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2006 in Case F-11/05 Chassagne v Commission [2006] ECR-SC I-A-65 and II-241; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2006 in Case F-11/05 Chassagne v Commission [2006] ECR-SC I-A-65 and II-241;

| 2. | Refers the case back to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal;

| 3. | Orders that the costs shall be reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders that the costs shall be reserved.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 18.11.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 10.2





Exhibit 10.2




Summary Description of Management Incentive Plan




The Company has an annual short-term incentive compensation plan, which is provided to members of
the Company’s management, including but not limited to all of its Executive Officers, through the
Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”). The MIP is designed to be competitive with compensation
offerings in our peer comparator group and to align compensation with financial performance drivers
that are intended to benefit stockholders. Specific measures are determined by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) prior to or in the first quarter
of the fiscal year for the potential annual MIP payout in question.



Performance measures under the MIP may include, but are not limited to, the following categories:




	•	 	Total Company financial results, such as earnings per share, cash flow, return on assets or
capital, or other financial results as determined by the Compensation Committee.

	 
	•	 	Financial results associated with the Company’s business segments:







	 	•	 	Turbine Systems

	 
	 	•	 	Airframe Systems

	 
	 	•	 	Electrical Power Systems

	 
	 	•	 	Engine Systems







	•	 	Additional performance metrics (either at the Company or the
business segment level) related to quality, delivery,
responsiveness, cost or other performance measures as determined
by the Compensation Committee from time to time.

	 
	•	 	Individual focused goals may also be used, as may be determined by
the Compensation Committee from time to time.






The Compensation Committee has discretion to predetermine and modify the performance measures and
threshold, target and maximum amounts payable under the plan.



Financial performance or other performance metrics are measured as of the last day of the fiscal
year and are validated prior to payout under the MIP for such fiscal year.
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 

OF 
 GEVO, INC. 

GEVO, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”),
does hereby certify as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The name of the Corporation is Gevo, Inc. 

  

	 	2.	The date on which the Corporation’s original Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware was June 9, 2005, under the name Methanotech, Inc. 


 

	 	3.	The Corporation’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on February 11, 2011, and amended on June 7, 2013 (the “Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation”). 

  

	 	4.	The Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “Board”), acting in accordance with the provisions of Sections 141 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, adopted resolutions to amend
and restate the first paragraph of the FOURTH article of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to read in its entirety as follows: 


“The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred
Stock.” The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 260,000,000, of which 250,000,000 shares shall be Common Stock, having a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Common
Stock”), and 10,000,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock, having a par value of $0.01 per share (the “Preferred Stock”).” 
  

	 	5.	Thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the Board, this Certificate of Amendment was submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for their approval, and was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Sections 222 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 

 [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Gevo, Inc. has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its Chief Financial
Officer as of July 7, 2014. 
  

			
	By:	 	
		 	/s/ Mike Willis
		 	Mike Willis

		 	Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of enherent Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas A. Catalano, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Douglas A. CatalanoDouglas A. CatalanoChairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentJanuary 25, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Radica
Games Limited (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report
on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Dated:  April 15, 2003


                                            /s/ David C.W. Howell
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: David C.W. Howell
                                            Title: President Asia Operations and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. Archimede N. NKIAM.

No. 385PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 29, 2016.

Daniel M. Blau, Raleigh, for Nkiam, Archimede N.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Robert H. Hale, Jr., Raleigh, for Nkiam, Archimede N.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 28th of March 2016 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of March 2016."

*745Defendant shall have up to and including the 6th of April 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.

ERVIN, J. recused.
# C_2008022EN.01001201.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 December 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling) from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium)) — BVBA Van Landeghem v Belgische Staat

(Case C-486/06) (1)

1

(Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff classification - Headings 8703 and 8704 - Pick-up type motor vehicle)

(2008/C 22/22)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BVBA Van Landeghem

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hof van Beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) — Interpretation of Council Regulation No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and the common customs tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1) — Headings 8703 and 8704 — Classification of a ‘pick-up’ motor vehicle with an enclosed cabin for use as a passenger compartment and a load space not higher than 50 cm, a luxurious interior, ABS braking system, 4 to 8 litre petrol engine, four-wheel drive and luxurious sports rims

Operative part of the judgment

Pick-ups such as those at issue in the main proceedings which consist, on the one hand, of an enclosed cabin for use as a passenger compartment, there being, behind the driver's seat, folding or removable seats with three-point safety belts, and, on the other hand, of a load space which is separated from the cabin, is not higher than 50 centimetres, can be opened only at the rear and has no facilities for attaching a load, which have a luxurious full-option interior (including electrically adjustable leather seats, electrically operated mirrors and windows and a stereo with a CD player), and which are equipped with an anti-lock braking system (ABS), an automatic, 4 to 8-litre, very high-consumption petrol engine, four-wheel drive and luxurious (sports) rims, must be classified, according to their general appearance and the entirety of their characteristics, under heading 8703 of the Combined Nomenclature as set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff as amended by the annexes to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3115/94 of 20 December 1994, Commission Regulation (EC) No 3009/95 of 22 December 1995 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1734/96 of 9 September 1996.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,914
<PP&E>                                      12,789,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,361,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,343,993
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           922
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,172,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,361,875
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,606,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             299,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,606,332)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,606,332)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,606,332)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.**

 

**Certification of Marc Holliday, President of WyomingAcquisition GP LLC, the sole general partner of the Registrant, pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

 

I,Marc Holliday, President of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole generalpartner of Reckson Operating Partnership, L. P. (the “Company”), certifypursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

1)         The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

 

2)         The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   November 12, 2010 | By     | /s/  Marc Holliday                          |
|--------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | Marc  Holliday                              |
|                                 |   | President                                   |
|                                 |   | of  Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC,             |
|                                 |   | the  sole general partner of the Registrant |

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mark A. Tunne, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 103]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 9, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a security guard. After he engaged in a heated exchange over the telephone with his branch manager and then his human resources manager regarding his schedule, he was told to make an appointment with the human resources manager to discuss his employment status. Claimant failed to make such appointment and was thereafter terminated. Claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits *1195was ultimately denied by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board on the ground that he lost his employment due to misconduct. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. “A claimant’s conduct in failing to comply with an employer’s reasonable request may constitute insubordination rising to the level of misconduct” *(Matter of Holland [Commissioner of Labor],*292 AD2d 667, 668 [2002] [citations omitted]; *see Matter of Bowen [Commissioner of Labor],*20 AD3d 642, 642 [2005]; *Matter of Denton [Commissioner of Labor],*7 AD3d 869 [2004]). Inasmuch as the employer’s request that claimant meet with the human resources manager to discuss his employment status following the dispute was reasonable and in accordance with established company policy, substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that claimant’s failure to schedule such meeting amounted to disqualifying misconduct *(see Matter of Bowen [Commissioner of Labor],*supra; *Matter of Ramsey [Fairview Recovery Servs., Inc.—Commissioner of Labor],*17 AD3d 949, 950 [2005]). Claimant’s allegation that he did not receive the letter containing the employer’s written request is of no consequence given that he admitted at the hearing that, on the day of the dispute, the human resources manager told him that he needed to schedule such appointment.

Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.