alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 781 

To extend the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to collect DoNot-Call Registry fees to fiscal years after fiscal year 2007. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2007 

Mr. PRYOR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To extend the authority of the Federal Trade Commission 

to collect Do-Not-Call Registry fees to fiscal years after 

fiscal year 2007. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY. 

4 (a) FEES.—Section 2 of the Do-Not-Call Implemen5 tation Act (15 U.S.C. 6101 note) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘for fiscal years 2003 through 

7 2007,’’; and 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘for such fiscal years’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 781 IS 

1 (b) REPORTS.—Section 4(b) of that Act is amended 

2 by striking ‘‘For each of fiscal years 2003 through 2007, 

3 the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      April 2, 2010 | By:                                                                                                                                                | /s/ Thomas      Seifert |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                     | Thomas      Seifert                                                                                                                                          |
|                     | Principal      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Director(Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting      Officer) |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,251,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,802,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,716,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,144,000
<PP&E>                                       6,733,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 457,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,746,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,652,000
<BONDS>                                     10,681,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,489,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,746,000
<SALES>                                     13,441,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,441,000
<CGS>                                        6,644,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,269,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,577,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,093,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,560,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (603,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,839,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Tommy Leon MOSES, Defendant.

No. COA15-625.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 1, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of UAP Holding Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended November 27, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David W. Bullock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



Date: January 10, 2006



By:

/s/  David W. BullockDavid W. BullockExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3792 

To repeal the reduction in the annual percentage increases of retired pay 

and retainer pay amounts for retired members of the Armed Forces 

under age 62. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2013 

Mr. WITTMAN (for himself and Mr. RIGELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the reduction in the annual percentage increases 

of retired pay and retainer pay amounts for retired members of the Armed Forces under age 62. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REDUCED ANNUAL PERCENTAGE 

4 INCREASES OF RETIRED PAY AND RETAINER 

5 PAY AMOUNTS FOR RETIRED MEMBERS OF 

6 THE ARMED FORCES UNDER AGE 62. 

7 Section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 

8 is hereby repealed. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                          9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,694
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         3,924
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       124,945
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         122,520
<LOANS>                                      184,876
<ALLOWANCE>                                      421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               340,186
<DEPOSITS>                                   214,493
<SHORT-TERM>                                  63,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            7,186
<LONG-TERM>                                   18,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         225
<OTHER-SE>                                    36,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               340,186
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               11,723
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              8,172
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 278
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              20,173
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             9,485
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,783
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          7,905
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     75
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                9,983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,019
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3,126
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,126
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.59 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  2.92
<LOANS-NON>                                      484
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 423
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     90
<RECOVERIES>                                      13
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                421
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             421
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
Ore Reserves Engineering
Alan C. Noble, P.E.
Principal Engineer







                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS


     As independent engineers, Ore Reserves Engineering ("ORE") has rendered
its  estimates of open-pit ore reserves for the Tonkin  Springs  Project,  dated
October,  1996. ORE hereby  consents to all references to ORE in the Form 10-KSB
for the period ended December 31, 1996, of Gold Capital Corporation.



                                            ORE RESERVES ENGINEERING


                                            /s/ Alan C. Noble, P.E.

                                                Alan C. Noble, P.E.



Lakewood, Colorado
March 20, 1997






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

303-237-8271 (Office)       12254 Applewood Knolls Drive
303-237-4533 (FAX)          Lakewood, Colorado 80215         303-238-2821 (Res.)
EXHIBIT 21

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF XECHEM INTERNATIONAL, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       NAME UNDER WHICH SUBSIDIARY
               NAME                              STATE OF INCORPORATION                       DOES BUSINESS
------------------------------------        ---------------------------------        ---------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>                                      <C>
           Xechem, Inc.                                 Illinois                                   Same
------------------------------------        ---------------------------------        ---------------------------------

     Xechem Laboratories, Inc.                         New Jersey                                  Same
------------------------------------        ---------------------------------        ---------------------------------

          XetaPharm, Inc.                              New Jersey                                  Same
------------------------------------        ---------------------------------        ---------------------------------

     Xechem (India) Pvt., Ltd.                     Republic of India                               Same
------------------------------------        ---------------------------------        ---------------------------------

  Xechem Pharmaceuticals Nigeria,
              Limited                             Republic of Nigeria                              Same
------------------------------------        ---------------------------------        ---------------------------------
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20064 Conference Calendar

ROQUE ARANDA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CAPTAIN SIMPSON; HUNT, Sergeant; MICHAEL WILSON; D. DUKE; SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL WYNNE UNIT, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-3253

-------------------- June 13, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Roque Aranda, Texas prisoner # 805045, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Aranda has failed to brief the relevant issue, as he has provided neither argument nor authorities to show that the district court erred in dismissing his suit.
See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).No. 01-20064 -2- Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) "prohibits a prisoner from proceeding IFP if he has had three actions or appeals dismissed for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim." Carson v. Johnson , 112 F.3d 818, 819 (5th Cir. 1997)(citing Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385 (5th Cir. 1996)). Aranda has previously had at least five strikes against him. Aranda v. Key , No. 00-10849 (5th Cir. Feb. 14, 2001)(imposing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar); Aranda v. Shaw , No. 00-10844 (5th Cir. Feb. 14, 2001)(imposing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar); Aranda v. Millsaps , No. 99-11394 (5th Cir. Aug. 29, 2000). Additionally, Aranda has recently been reminded of the § 1915(g) bar in five other appeals which were before this court. See Aranda v. Cason , No. 00-10848 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 2001); Aranda v. Wilson , No. 00-21035 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 2001); Aranda v. Hirsch , No. 00-10850 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 2001); Aranda v. Scott , No. 00- 21129 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 2001); Aranda v. Wilson , No. 00-20968 (5th Cir. Apr. 12, 2001). Aranda filed this appeal before the § 1915(g) bar was imposed. He is reminded that he may no longer proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.01


 


Employment Agreement of Michael Jay Solomon


 


Truli Media Group, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, agrees to pay Chief Executive Officer Michael Jay Solomon a salary of $375,000 per annum.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

#### **CERTIFICATIONSOF PERIODIC REPORT**

#### ** **

I, John R. Serino, President and Chief Executive Officer of EncisionInc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best ofmy knowledge:

 

•                  the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

 

•                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Dated:   August 12, 2004 |                                  |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                         |                                  |
|                                         | /s/ John R. Serino                    |   |
|                                         |                                  |
|                                         | John R. Serino                        |
|                                         | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

I, Marcia McHaffie, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer ofEncision Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best ofmy knowledge:

 

•                  the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

 

•                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   August 12, 2004 |                                        |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                         |                                        |
|                                         | /s/ Marcia McHaffie                         |   |
|                                         |                                        |
|                                         | Marcia McHaffie                             |
|                                         | Controller and Principal Accounting Officer |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54639-54640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18565]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[R03-OAR-2005-DE-0001; FRL-7970-4]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Delaware; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to adverse comments, EPA is withdrawing the direct final 
rule to approve Delaware's State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. 
The SIP revision pertains to the modifications to the ambient air 
quality standards for ozone and fine particulate matter. In the direct 
final rule published on July 18, 2005 (70 FR 41146), we stated that if 
we received adverse comments by August 17, 2005, the rule would be 
withdrawn and not take effect. EPA subsequently received adverse 
comments. EPA will address the comments received in a subsequent final 
action based upon the proposed action also published on July 18, 2005 
(70 FR 41166). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this 
action.

DATES: The direct final rule is withdrawn as of September 16, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b3a3e22253f24653924382e0b2e3b2a652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f7e7a66617b60217d607c6a4f6a7f6e21686079">[email protected]</span></a>.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide, 
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Volatile organic compounds.


[[Page 54640]]


    Dated: September 6, 2005.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
Accordingly, the added entry for Delaware's Regulation 1, Section 2, 
and revised entries for Regulation 3, Sections 1, 6, and 11 in 40 CFR 
52.420(c) published at 70 FR 41147 are withdrawn as of September 16, 
2005.

[FR Doc. 05-18565 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7736

ANDRE COOPER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:14-cv-00112-FPS-MJA)

Submitted: April 28, 2016 Decided: May 5, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Andre Cooper, a federal prisoner, appeals the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Cooper v. O’Brien, No. 5:14-cv-00112-FPS-MJA (N.D. W. 

Va. Oct. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT II

                      UNIVERSAL AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           Three Months Ended June 30,      Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                           ---------------------------      -------------------------
                                                              2001             2000            2001            2000
                                                              ----             ----            ----            ----
<S>                                                        <C>                <C>              <C>        <C>

BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Net Income (Loss)                                            $202,750        $121,058      $(882,177)        $178,068
                                                             ========        ========      ==========        ========

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding                  7,473,682       6,914,310       7,384,542       6,876,810
                                                            =========       =========       =========       =========


Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share                        $0.03          $ 0.02         $(0.12)           $0.03
                                                                =====          ======         =======           =====


DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Net Income (Loss):                                           $202,750        $121,058      $(882,177)        $178,068
                                                             ========        ========      ==========        ========

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding                  7,473,682       6,914,310       7,384,542       6,876,810
Options and warrants assumed to be Common Stock
        equivalents using Treasury Stock Method               396,190         599,201               0         815,198
                                                              -------         -------         -------        --------
Weighted average common shares outstanding, as
        adjusted                                            7,869,872       7,513,511       7,384,542       7,692,008
                                                            =========       =========       =========       =========


Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Common Share                      $0.03           $0.02         $(0.12)           $0.02
                                                                =====           =====         =======           =====
</TABLE>