alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136654 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

NEIL BEGIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136654 

 COA: 280717 

WCAC: 06-000186 

MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY/

SBC, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

SECOND INJURY FUND (PERMANENT & 

TOTAL DISABILITY PROVISION),

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
STATE v. Brent Tyler MILLER.

No. 199PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Feb. 5, 2016.

Noell P. Tin, Charlotte, for Miller, Brent Tyler.

Derrick Mertz, Raleigh, for State of North Carolina.

Aisha J. Dennis, Attorney at Law, for Miller, Brent Tyler.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of February 2016 by Defendant to Supplement the Record:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of February 2016."
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**  I, James R. Kupferschmid, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kitty Hawk, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        May 15, 2007 By:  /s/ JAMES R. KUPFERSCHMID    James R. Kupferschmid    Principal Executive Officer
# C_2009113EN.01000401.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2009 — Selex Sistemi Integrati SpA. v Commission of the European Communities, European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol)

(Case C-113/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Competition - Article 82 EC - Concept of an ‘undertaking’ - Economic activity - International organisation - Abuse of a dominant position)

2009/C 113/06

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Selex Sistemi Integrati SpA (represented by: F. Sciaudone, R. Sciaudone and D. Fioretti, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities, European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol) (represented by: F. Montag and T. Wessely, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2006 in Case T-155/04 Selex Sistemi Integrati v Commission by which that Court dismissed an application for annulment or amendment of the Commission’s decision of 12 February 2004 rejecting the complaint lodged by Selex concerning an alleged infringement by Eurocontrol of the provisions of the EC Treaty relating to competition

Selex Sistemi Integrati

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Selex Sistemi Integrati SpA to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities and half the costs incurred by the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Selex Sistemi Integrati SpA to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities and half the costs incurred by the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol);

| 3. | Orders the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation to pay half its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation to pay half its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 117, 26.5.2007.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Corey Dontez LANE, Defendant.

No. COA15-892.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 1, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Plain Error in part, vacated and remanded in part.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136901 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136901 

 COA: 284694 

Calhoun CC: 07-003600-FC 

PEGGY LEE WHITE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
Independent Accountants' Report



Board of Directors
Community Investors Bancorp, Inc.
119 South Sandusky Avenue
Bucyrus, Ohio  44820



We  have  reviewed  the  accompanying   consolidated   statements  of  financial
condition, earnings, comprehensive income, and cash flows of Community Investors
Bancorp,  Inc. as of September  30, 1999,  and for the  three-month  period then
ended.  The financial  statements are the  responsibility  of the  Corporation's
management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A review  of  interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with  generally  accepted  auditing  standards,  the  objective  of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in accordance  with generally  accepted  auditing
standards,  the  consolidated  statement of  financial  condition as of June 30,
1999, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented  herein) and in our report
dated August 19, 1999, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial  statements.  In  our  opinion,  the  information  set  forth  in  the
accompanying  consolidated statement of financial condition as of June 30, 1999,
is fairly  stated,  in all material  respects,  in relation to the  consolidated
statement of financial condition from which it has been derived.



/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP


Cincinnati, Ohio
November 11, 1999
# C_2008209EN.01004901.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/49

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 July 2008 — Stradivarius España v OHIM — Ricci (Stradivari 1715)

(Case T-340/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Stradivari 1715 - Earlier Community figurative Stradivarius trade marks - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 209/85)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Stradivarius España (Arteixo, Spain) (represented by: G. Marín Raigal and P. López Ronda, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Montalto and A. Sempio, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Cristina Ricci (Reggello, Italy) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzaretti, M. Boretto and E. Gavuzzi, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 September 2006 (Case R 1024/2005-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Stradivarius España, SA and Cristina Ricci.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Stradivarius España, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Stradivarius España, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
# C_2008171EN.01000801.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 May 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-503/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 79/409/EEC - Conservation of wild birds - Derogations from the system of protection of wild birds - Region of Liguria)

(2008/C 171/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Recchia, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I. Braguglia, Agent and G. Fiengo, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Adoption and application, by the region of Liguria, of legislation authorising derogations from the system of protection for wild birds which fails to satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 9 of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 concerning the conservation of wild birds (OJ 1979 L 103, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | By adopting and applying, for the region of Liguria, legislation authorising derogations from the system of protection for wild birds which fails to satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 9 of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 concerning the conservation of wild birds, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

By adopting and applying, for the region of Liguria, legislation authorising derogations from the system of protection for wild birds which fails to satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 9 of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 concerning the conservation of wild birds, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | The Italian Republic is ordered to bear the costs, including those linked to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Italian Republic is ordered to bear the costs, including those linked to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 14.4.2007.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3755 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3755

 To provide that the reinsurance fee for the transitional reinsurance 
program under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act be applied 
    equally to all health insurance issuers and group health plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2013

 Mr. Perry (for himself and Mr. Gosar) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that the reinsurance fee for the transitional reinsurance 
program under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act be applied 
    equally to all health insurance issuers and group health plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Union Tax Fairness Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF REINSURANCE FEE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the payments required 
to be made by health insurance issuers and third party administrators 
(on behalf of group health plans) under section 1341(b)(1)(A) of the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18061(b)(1)(A)) 
shall be applied equally to all such issuers and administrators and may 
not be waived on behalf of any such issuer, administrator or group 
health plan.
                                 <all>
```
# CE2004078EN.01039001.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/390 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/390

---

(2004/C 78 E/0413)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1854/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(3 June 2003)

Subject:   Landslides in Greece and infrastructural damage

Subject:

In my Written Question E-1141/03 (1) I asked the Commission whether landslides in Greece (causing unprecedented damage in many cases to infrastructures which had been completed only a few months previously) were linked to geological upheavals which could be caused by intense seismic activity affecting Greece as a whole.

1

The reply by Commissioner Barnier was not entirely satisfactory since he referred me to replies from his colleagues, omitting any mention of my query regarding the connection between landslides and seismic activity in Greece. Can the Commission reply to this question and say whether it has carried out surveys of seismic activity in the south-east Mediterranean containing forecasts or conclusions regarding the possible future intensification of this phenomenon?

Answer given by Mr Busquin on behalf of the Commission

(23 July 2003)

(23 July 2003)

It is well known that certain landslides in Greece like the Malakassa slide in 1995 provoked the disruption of road and railway links between Athens and Northern Greece for about four days. The risk of landslides as a research issue was recognised in the 4th and 5th Community Research and Technological Development (RTD) Framework Programmes and led to the funding of research projects under the theme ‘natural hazards’. The Sixth framework Programme foresees the continuation of funding research on landslides under the priority ‘Global Change and Ecosystems’. Landslide research focuses on risk assessment and mitigation with the aim of evaluating strategies for disaster reduction, while integrating the social and economic impacts of disasters. One of the main aims of the Community funded research projects is the study of the mechanisms provoking landslides; another objective is the monitoring of landslides using remote sensing techniques and comparing them with infield information; there are also ongoing geotechnical investigations which study the subsidence problems.

In this context, the Community funded project ‘Segrodi’, which studied displacements of slopes caused by earthquakes, is worth mentioning. It seems that important earthquakes can also cause slope slides. However, for the time being, there is no clear evidence of any forecast capability regarding the intensification of the links between landslides and earthquakes in Greece.

At present, there are some relevant studies being supported under the Environment Programme of the 5th RTD Framework Programme, the results of which are foreseen to be presented at the next Euro Mediterranean Disaster Information Network (EURO-MEDIN) Forum which is expected to be held around the end of 2004.

---

(1)  See page 360.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,361
<SECURITIES>                                    12,692
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,387
<PP&E>                                          33,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,279)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       102,499
<OTHER-SE>                                    (75,109)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,306
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**RECKSONOPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.**

 

**Certificationof Gregory F. Hughes, Treasurer of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole generalpartner of the Registrant, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18**

**ofthe United States Code**

 

I, Gregory F.Hughes,Treasurer of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole general partner of RecksonOperating Partnership, L. P. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1)   TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2)              The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 12,  2009 |   |                                        |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                           | By     | /s/ GREGORY F. HUGHES                       |
|                           |   | Gregory  F. Hughes                          |
|                           |   | Treasurer                                   |
|                           |   | of  Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC,             |
|                           |   | the  sole general partner of the Registrant |

 

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Melissa Amber DALTON.

No. 336PA15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, Attorney at Law, for Dalton, Melissa Amber.

Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

James R. Glover, Chapel Hill, Attorney at Law.

Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th of October 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the *512Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th of October 2015 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00121-CV

In re Elizabeth Weston

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). We lift 

the stay of the proceedings in the underlying case. See id. R. 52.10.

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith

Filed: July 16, 2021