alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     49,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               175,432
<PP&E>                                         831,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 927,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          169,202
<BONDS>                                        452,626
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           170
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   927,921
<SALES>                                        138,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,505
<CGS>                                          122,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,333)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2008 – Gualtieri v Commission**

**(Case T-284/06)**

Seconded national expert – Subsistence allowances – Place of residence at the time of secondment – Objection of illegality of Article 20(3)(b) of the decision on Seconded national experts – Principle of equal treatment

1.                     *Officials – Reimbursement of expenses – Seconded national experts – Daily subsistence allowance (Art. 141 EC) (see paras 28-31)*

2.                     *Community law – Principles – Protection of legitimate expectations (see paras 41-43)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ANNULMENT of the decision of the Commission of 30 January 2006 dismissing the applicant’s claim for adjustment, following her divorce, of the amount of the allowances payable under Article 17 of Commission Decision C(2002) 1559 of 30 April 2002 laying down the rules applicable to Seconded national experts, as amended. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Ms Claudia Gualtieri to pay the costs. |
# C_2008022EN.01001701.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 December 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-258/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2004/18/EC - Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts - Non-transposition within the prescribed period)

(2008/C 22/32)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Kukovec and K. Nyberg, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Falk, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have adopted, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by not having adopted, within the prescribed period, the legislative, regulatory and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by not having adopted, within the prescribed period, the legislative, regulatory and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 4.8.2007.

1

---
# C_2010288EN.01007602.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/76

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 July 2010 — Vereecken v Commission

(Case F-86/06) (1)

()

(2010/C 288/145)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 237, 30.9.2006, p. 19.

---
EXHIBIT 32

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Micrel, Incorporated
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

   (i)   the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: August 17, 2006            /s/ Raymond D. Zinn
                                 ---------------------------------------
                                 Raymond D. Zinn
                                 Chief Executive Officer

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Micrel, Incorporated
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

   (i)   the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: August 17, 2006            /s/ Richard D. Crowley
                                 ---------------------------------------
                                 Richard D. Crowley
                                 Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Edward Moers and Daniel Moers v. Harris County Appraisal District, 

Chief Appraiser of Harris County Appraisal, Jim Robinson, and Harris 

County Appraisal Review Board

Appellate case number: 01-13-00549-CV

Trial court case number: 2009-55877

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

It is ordered that Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing is denied.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle

Date: September 3, 2015
EXHIBIT
      32.1








The
      following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer of Saxon Capital, Inc. on the basis of each such
      officer’s knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002:





**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Saxon Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2005 (the “Report”), the undersigned, as
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








November
                9, 2005
            /s/
                Michael L. SawyerMichael
                L. SawyerChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Robert B. EastepRobert
                B. EastepChief
                Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission upon request. This certification accompanies the Report
      and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of the
      Report.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RENAL CARE GROUP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,507
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,999
<PP&E>                                         121,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 482,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           448
<OTHER-SE>                                     309,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   482,384
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               520,607
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  335,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                86,823
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,878
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,502
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,041
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,461
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04


</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

March 14, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh 135881 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.
IN RE SZANTO KADO-DESHAWN BROWN, Stephen J. Markman, Justices Minor.

_____________ _______________ ____________
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 135881 COA: 277791 Oakland CC

LINDA NICKSON, Respondent-Appellant, Family Division: 06-727652-NA

and

KENNETH BROWN, Respondent.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d0311 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 14, 2008
Clerk
Exhibit 32 for 10QSB/A 10/31/2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Amended  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Titan
Technologies,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period ended October 31, 2003, as
filed with the  Securities  and  exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, the undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C./  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     a)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

         Date: May 13, 2004                        /s/ Ronald L. Wilder
                                                   --------------------------
                                                   Ronald L. Wilder, President,
                                                   (Chief Executive Officer)
                                                   (Chief Financial Officer)
The NC State Bar v. Tillett

208PA15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 15, 2016

Mr. Norman W. Shearin, Attorney at Law, Kitty Hawk, Mr. David P. Ferrell, Attorney at Law, Mr. Kevin A. Rust, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Tillett, Jerry R.

Mr. G. Patrick Murphy, Attorney at Law, for The NC State Bar.

Ms. Jennifer A. Porter, Deputy Counsel.

Ms. Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, for N.C. Judicial Standards Commission.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of July 2016 by the N.C. Judicial Standards Commission for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of July 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,386
<INVENTORY>                                     46,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,872
<PP&E>                                         246,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 340,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,345
<BONDS>                                        382,880
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     17,093
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                   (150,570)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   340,807
<SALES>                                        328,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               329,057
<CGS>                                          241,067
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  296,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   324
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,584)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       554
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,138)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,138)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Dime Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-88552, 33-88554, 33-88556, 33-88558, 33-88560, 33-88564, 33-88566, 333-04477,
333-26609, 333-26777, 333-35565, 333-48127, 333-51941, 333-64509, 333-75103,
333-77317, 333-88071 and 333-89901) on Form S-8 of Dime Bancorp, Inc. of our
report dated January 20, 2000 relating to the consolidated statements of
financial condition of Dime Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, cash flows and comprehensive income for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the
December 31, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dime Bancorp, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 30, 2000
Exhibit 99.12
 CONSENT OF P. JOHN BARTON
   1.
    
    The technical report dated March 31, 2006 entitled Technical Report
NI 43-101F1 Los Filos Project, Mexico (the Los Filos Report); and2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection
with information relating to the Los Filos Report and the Los Filos
Mine, and the properties described therein.
  /s/ P. John BartonName:
    P. John BartonTitle:
    Minerals Industry Consultant
# C_2009032EN.01002702.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/27

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 December 2008 — Giorgio Beverly Hills v OHIM — WHG (GIORGIO BEVERLY HILLS)

(Case T-228/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark GIORGIO BEVERLY HILLS - Earlier national word mark GIORGIO - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 32/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Beverly Hills, Inc. (Cincinnati, Ohio, United States) (represented by: M. Schaeffer, and subsequently by K. Sandberg, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen and G. Schneider, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: WHG Westdeutsche Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Hagen, Germany) (represented by: H. Prange, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 June 2006 (Joined Cases R 107/2005-2 and R 187/2005-2), concerning opposition proceedings between WHG Westdeutsche Handelsgesellschaft mbH and Giorgio Beverly Hills, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 21 June 2006 (Cases R 107/2005-2 and R 187/2005-2) in so far as it dismissed the appeal in Case R 187/2005-2; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 21 June 2006 (Cases R 107/2005-2 and R 187/2005-2) in so far as it dismissed the appeal in Case R 187/2005-2;

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Giorgio Beverly Hills, Inc. during the proceedings before the Court of First Instance; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Giorgio Beverly Hills, Inc. during the proceedings before the Court of First Instance;

| 3. | Orders WHG Westdeutsche Handelsgesellschaft mbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Giorgio Beverly Hills for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders WHG Westdeutsche Handelsgesellschaft mbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Giorgio Beverly Hills for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM.

---

(1)  OJ C 249, 14.10.2006.

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Kitty Hawk, Inc. (the Company), does hereby
certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,
2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. Date: May 14, 2004
    By:
    /s/ ROBERT W. ZOLLER, JR.Robert W. Zoller, Jr.Chief Executive Officer and PresidentDate: May 14, 2004
    By:
    /s/ RANDY S. LEISERRandy S. LeiserVice President and Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.