alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004065EN.01007002.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/70

---

(2004/C 65 E/081)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1235/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(2 April 2003)

Subject:   Rome city authorities: use of funds available under the Action Framework for sustainable urban development in the EU

Subject:

In September 2002 the Italian Economic Affairs Ministry's monitoring committee submitted a statement of expenditure in respect of funding provided by the EU.

The statement worryingly reveals — amongst other things — that some local and regional bodies are very slow and inefficient when it comes to authorising projects.

Similar concern regarding the underuse of EU funding by such bodies has been expressed on a number of occasions — not least by the Commission itself.

With particular regard to the fact that certain local and regional bodies (such as the Rome city authorities) are greatly in need of EU funding in order to promote sustainable urban development,

would the Commission answer the following questions:

| 1. | Have the Rome city authorities submitted projects under the Action Framework for sustainable urban development? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Have the Rome city authorities submitted projects under the Action Framework for sustainable urban development?

| 2. | Has funding for such projects been obtained? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Has funding for such projects been obtained?

| 3. | Has that funding been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Has that funding been used?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-1210/03, E-1211/03, E-1212/03, E-1213/03,

E-1214/03, E-1215/03, E-1216/03, E-1217/03, E-1218/03, E-1219/03,

E-1220/03, E-1221/03, E-1222/03, E-1223/03, E-1224/03 and E-1235/03

given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(21 May 2003)

(21 May 2003)

The Commission would ask the Honourable Member to refer to its communication Sustainable urban development in the European Union: a framework for action (1). This is a policy discussion paper on coordination of the various approaches the Commission has taken in the numerous sectoral policies affecting the urban environment.

1

On use of Community funds by towns and cities, the paper recommends particular attention to urban problems when the Operational Programmes for Structural Fund Objectives 1, 2 and 3 are presented by the Member States' authorities.

Thus no Community funds have been directly awarded in implementation of the framework to the sixteen Italian towns and cities mentioned by the Honourable Member or to any other town or city in Europe.

---

(1)  COM(98) 605 final.

1

---
Davon William Reed, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

July 11, 2016

ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on July 6, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable George C. James, Jr. be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge James shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge James shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
PRICE v. STATE of North Carolina, OFFICE OF the STATE AUDITOR.

No. 471P14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Brandon L. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina Office of the State Auditor.

Michael C. Byrne, Raleigh, for Price, John.

Valerie L. Bateman, OSHR General Counsel, for State of North Carolina Office of the State Auditor.

John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, for State of North Carolina Office of the State Auditor.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of January 2015 by Respondent for Leave to File Reply Brief to Response to Motion to Dismiss:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."

ERVIN, J. recused.
STATE of North Carolina v. Daniel Clay MOORE.

No. COA15-687.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 15, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
In the Matter of K.A.K.

No. COA15-1082.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 7, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2062

TED SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (1:05-cv-00577-NCT)

Submitted: July 30, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ted Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Kavonne L. Mayeski, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts; John W. Stone, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ted Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the

Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits and

supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Smith v. Social Security Admin., No. 1:05-

cv-00577-NCT (M.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 67 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 67

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the 
Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to 
 travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent 
 as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel on such 
                               aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. Reid (for Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; which was read 
         twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the 
Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to 
 travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent 
 as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel on such 
                               aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRAVEL ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT OF CERTAIN DISABLED FORMER 
              MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 1060b the following new section:
``Sec. 1060c. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled former 
              members of the armed forces
    ``The Secretary of Defense shall permit any former member of the 
armed forces who is entitled to compensation under the laws 
administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for a service-
connected disability rated as total to travel, in the same manner and 
to the same extent as retired members of the armed forces, on 
unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and 
on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility Command. The 
Secretary of Defense shall permit such travel on a space-available 
basis.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
1060b the following new item:

``1060c. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled former members 
                            of the armed forces.''.
                                 <all>
```
MEZA v. DIV. OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al.

No. 518A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2008.

Thomas E. Cone, Greensboro, for Meza.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of December 2008 by Respondent for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Respondent (Div. of Social Services, et al) shall have up to and including the 12th day of January 2009 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of December 2008."
# Decision (EU) 2015/2202 of the European Central Bank (repealed)Show full title

Decision (EU) 2015/2202 of the European Central Bank of 19 November 2015 amending Decision ECB/2010/23 on the allocation of            monetary income of the national central banks of Member States whose currency is the euro (ECB/2015/37) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Decision (EU) 2015/2202 of the European Central Bank

# of 19 November 2015

# amending Decision ECB/2010/23 on the allocation of monetary income of the national central banks of Member States whose currency                        is the euro (ECB/2015/37) (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/36 of 14 January 2016 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against                                 Iran.
Dora P. BULLOCK, Plaintiff, v. Adam HOPLER, Hopler & Wilms, LLP, Defendant.

No. COA15-537.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 16, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# C_2012118EN.01002201.xml

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 March 2012 — FLS Plast v Commission

(Case T-64/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Plastic industrial bags sector - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Duration of the infringement - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation during the administrative procedure - Proportionality - Joint and several liability - Principle of ne bis in idem)

2012/C 118/35

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: FLS Plast A/S (Valby, Denmark) (represented initially by: K. Lasok QC and subsequently by M. Thill-Tayara, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, Agent, and by M. Gray, Barrister)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags) and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags) in so far as it holds FLS Plast A/S liable for the single and continuous infringement referred to in Article 1(1) thereof, for the period from 31 December 1990 to 31 December 1991; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags) in so far as it holds FLS Plast A/S liable for the single and continuous infringement referred to in Article 1(1) thereof, for the period from 31 December 1990 to 31 December 1991;

| 2. | Sets the amount for payment of which FLS Plast is held jointly and severally liable under Article 2(f) of Decision C(2005) 4634 at EUR 14.45 million; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sets the amount for payment of which FLS Plast is held jointly and severally liable under Article 2(f) of Decision C(2005) 4634 at EUR 14.45 million;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission and FLS Plast each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission and FLS Plast each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

1

---
# CE2004070EN.01024002.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/240 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/240

---

(2004/C 70 E/259)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3225/03

by Richard Corbett (PSE) to the Commission

(31 October 2003)

Subject:   Live transmission of bullfights

Subject:

Does the Commission consider that Spain is correctly applying Council Directive 89/552/EEC (1) which requires in Article 22 that ‘Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that television broadcasts by broadcasters under their jurisdiction do not include any programmes which might seriously impair physical, mental or moral development of minors, in particular programmes that involve pornography or gratuitous violence’?

1

Is the Commission aware that Spanish television broadcasts bullfights at a time of day at which children are likely to be watching television?

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(28 November 2003)

(28 November 2003)

The Commission is aware of the situation described by the Honourable Member and is currently determining whether the broadcasting of these programmes is compatible with the provisions of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities.

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 17.10.1989, p. 23.

1

---
# CE2004078EN.01027401.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/274 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/274

---

(2004/C 78 E/0275)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3378/03

by Marianne Thyssen (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 November 2003)

Subject:   European financial assistance to European contact points

Subject:

On 29 September 2003, the Commission's Directorate-General for Press and Communication informed the host institutions of the Info-Points Europe and the Carrefours throughout the European Union of the decision that, as from 1 January 2004, operating subsidies to these regional European information centres would cease. In practice this means that each centre will lose some EUR 20 000 per annum in subsidy.

The importance of these European information centres would be hard to overestimate, and in the present political context it would even be fair to describe them as essential. The forthcoming historic enlargement of the EU and the June 2004 European elections are just two of the many European developments about which the public need to be informed in their own region. If the Commission wishes to encourage public involvement in European affairs, it should also ensure that the requisite information is made available.

Without the European financial support on which they depend, the European contact points cannot possibly survive, and this will mean that the gulf between the European institutions and the citizens of the EU will grow yet further.

| 1. | What are the grounds for the unexpected and ill-considered decision by DG Press and Communication to cut the operating subsidy to the European contact points? |
| --- | --- |

1.

What are the grounds for the unexpected and ill-considered decision by DG Press and Communication to cut the operating subsidy to the European contact points?

| 2. | Will the Commission revoke the decision by DG Press and Communication and investigate how extra European funding can be provided for the Info-Points and Carrefours, in view of their great importance to the public in Europe? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Will the Commission revoke the decision by DG Press and Communication and investigate how extra European funding can be provided for the Info-Points and Carrefours, in view of their great importance to the public in Europe?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(29 January 2004)

(29 January 2004)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its answer to written E-3007/03 by Mr Santini (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ C 70 E, 20.3.2004, p. 191.

1

---
# C_2012209EN.01000701.xml

| 14.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/7

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 June 2012 — Imperial Chemical Industries v European Commission

(Case T-214/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Methacrylates market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Participation in a part of the cartel - Rights of the defence - Fines - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Gravity of the infringement - Deterrent effect - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Principle of sound administration - Cooperation during the administrative procedure - Duration of procedure - Reasonable time)

2012/C 209/10

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd, formerly Imperial Chemical Industries plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented: initially by D. Anderson QC, H. Rosenblatt, B. Lebrun, lawyers, W. Turner, S. Berwick and T. Soames, Solicitors, subsequently by R. Wesseling and C. Swaak and lastly by R. Wesseling, C. Swaak and F. ten Have, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by V. Bottka, I. Chatzigiannis and F. Amato, subsequently by V. Bottka, I. Chatzigiannis and F. Arbault and lastly by V. Bottka and J. Bourke, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 2(c) of Commission Decision C(2006) 2098 final of 31 May 2006 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.645 — Methacrylates), or, in the alternative, a reduction of the fine imposed under that provision.

Operative part of the judgment:

Operative part of the judgment:

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 237, 30.9.2006.

1

---
# C_2009032EN.01002901.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/29

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 December 2008 — Bateaux Mouches v OHIM — Castanet (BATEAUX MOUCHES)

(Case T-365/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark BATEAUX MOUCHES - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and Article 51(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Lack of distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 32/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Compagnie des bateaux mouches SA (Paris, France) (represented by: D. de Leusse, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Jean-Noël Castanet (Munich, Germany) (represented by: J. Sulzer, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 September 2006 (Case R 1172/2005-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Jean-Noël Castanet and the Compagnie des bateaux mouches SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders the Compagnie des bateaux mouches SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Compagnie des bateaux mouches SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.01

Quintiles Transnational Corp. and Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Quintiles Transnational Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2003, as amended by
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 29, 2003, and Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis
B. Gillings, Chairman of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  |                       
| |  | ----------------------
| |  | /s/ Dennis B. Gillings
| |  | Dennis B. Gillings    
| |  | Chairman              
| |  |                       
| |  | August 26, 2003       
| |  | Date                  

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

93