alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Louis L. Knickerbocker and William C. Hitchcock, certify that:



1.

We have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of R.G. Global Lifestyles, Inc.



2.

Based upon our knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3.

Based on our knowledge, the financial statements, consolidated financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and we are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including any subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)

presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and we have disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data, and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers and we have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated:  October 19, 2004





/s/ Louis L. Knickerbocker

Louis L. Knickerbocker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ William C. Hitchcock

William C. Hitchcock, Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 09, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 09, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0033. RENASANT CORPORATION et al. v. DEAN A KORST.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2019CV327307
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Form S-8 No. 333-37299 and Form S-8 No. 333-74565) pertaining to the Renal 
Care Group, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and the 
Dialysis Centers of America Inc. Equity Compensation Plan of our reports dated 
March 2, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and 
schedule of Renal Care Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) 
for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Nashville, Tennessee
March 26, 1999
**Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2008 – Commission v Greece**

**(Case C‐305/06)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Combined transport of goods between the Member States – Directive 92/106/EEC – Final road haulage leg forming an integral part of a combined transport operation – Nearest suitable railway station

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Proof of failure – Burden of proof on Commission – Presumptions – Not permissible
(Art. 226 EC) (see para. 41)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Application initiating proceedings – Statement of subject-matter and pleas in
law – Formal requirements – Unambiguous wording of the form of order sought by the applicant (Art. 226 EC; Statute of the
Court of Justice, Art. 21; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 38(1)(c)) (see para. 47)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Articles 2 and 4 of Council Directive 92/106/EEC on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States (OJ 1992 L 368, p. 38) – Final road haulage leg forming an integral part of a combined transport operation – Requirement of a Greek road transport authorisation. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
STATE of North Carolina v. Elbert Levone MARTIN.

No. COA15-566.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 16, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# C_2009006EN.01000402.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 November 2008 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — The Competition Authority v Beef Industry Development Society Ltd, Barry Brothers (Carrigmore) Meats Ltd

(Case C-209/07) (1)

1

(Competition - Article 81(1) EC - Concept of an ‘agreement having as its object the restriction of competition’ - Agreement to reduce production capacity - Beef and veal)

(2009/C 6/07)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: The Competition Authority

Appellant:

Respondents: Beef Industry Development Society Ltd, Barry Brothers (Carrigmore) Meats Ltd

Respondents:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Supreme Court, Ireland — Interpretation of Article 81(1) EC — Measures limiting or controlling production — Inclusion of an agreement whose effect is to reduce structural capacity selectively

Operative part of the judgment

An agreement with features such as those of the standard form of contract concluded between the 10 principal beef and veal processors in Ireland, who are members of Beef Industry Development Society Ltd, and requiring, among other things, a reduction of the order of 25 % in processing capacity, has as its object the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the meaning of Article 81(1) EC.

---

(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 4, 2021

Order 

Clerk

June 4, 2021

161797(70)

161805(81)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

SC: 161797

v COA: 343818 

Arenac CC: 17-004120-FH 

MICHELINE NICOLE LEFFEW, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_______________________________________

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

SC: 161805

v COA: 344240 

Arenac CC: 17-004119-FH 

JEREMIAH JAMES LEFFEW, 

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellants to extend the time 

for filing their reply briefs is GRANTED. The reply briefs will be accepted as timely filed 

if submitted on or before June 16, 2021.
Opinion issued February 21 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 8
- 00 384
- CV

——————————— PING HUI , Appella nt

V. T.J. MAXX OF TEXAS, INC., MARMAXX OPERATING CO RP, D/B/A T.J. MAXX; & ANTHONY KELL UM; & MASSEY PROTECT ION SERVICES , Appell e e s
On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County , Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2015
- 61011

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant , Ping Hui , ha s failed to timely file a brief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6( a ) ( governing time to file brief ), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did2

not adequately respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goo dman and Countiss

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# AGENCY:

Department of the Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Change in meeting date. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice advises all interested persons of change in the date of a public meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform. 

# DATES:

The meeting scheduled to be held on Thursday, September 15, 2005, has been postponed. This meeting will be rescheduled and announced at a later date. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Panel staff at (202) 927-2TAX (927-2829) (not a toll-free call) or e-mail                         *info@taxreformpanel.gov*                         (please do not send comments to this box). Additional information is available at                         *http://www.taxreformpanel.gov*.                     

Dated: September 8, 2005. 

Mark S. Kaizen, 

Designated Federal Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-18143 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4811-33-P
Ila M. McMillan-Ervin, Plaintiff, v. Bruce M. Ervin, Defendant.

No. COA16-209

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: September 20, 2016

DISMISSED.
Ricardo L. BAILEY v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY; Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC; and Kathleen Burns, individually.

No. 20P16.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Adam H. Chames, for Ford Motor Company.

Chris W. Haaf, Winston-Salem, for Ford Motor Company.

M. Keith Kapp, Raleigh, for Ford Motor Company.

Thomas L. Ogburn, III, Charlotte, for Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC, et al.

Courtauld M. Young.

James K. Pendergrass, Jr., Raleigh.

Molly A. Whitlatch, Burlington, for Bailey, Ricardo L.

Pamela S. Duffy, Burlington, for Bailey, Ricardo L.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th of January 2016 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> *515"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald R. Kiepert, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Annual Report of Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in such Annual
Report of Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Point Therapeutics, Inc.



By:

/s/    DONALD R. KIEPERT, JR.Name:

Donald R. Kiepert, Jr.Title:

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

March 15, 2006


I, Richard N. Small, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act and that information contained in such Annual Report Point Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Point Therapeutics, Inc.



By:

/s/    RICHARD N. SMALLName:

Richard N. SmallTitle:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 15, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Point
Therapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by Point Therapeutics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          30,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,000
<PP&E>                                       7,754,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,449,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,507,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (14,058,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,449,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,996,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,161,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,789,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (7,785,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (7,785,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,785,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Strasbaugh (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to their knowledge:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  July 30, 2008                        By:   /s/ Chuck Schillings
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Chuck Schillings
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 (principal executive officer)

Date:  July 30, 2008                        By:   /s/ Richard Nance
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Richard Nance
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 (principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3843 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

discharges of Federal student loans as a result of veterans’ serviceconnected total disability that is permanent in nature. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2014 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income discharges of Federal student loans 

as a result of veterans’ service-connected total disability 

that is permanent in nature. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Tax Parity 

5 Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3843 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR DISCHARGE 

2 OF FEDERAL STUDENT LOANS OF VETERANS 

3 AS A RESULT OF PERMANENT SERVICE-CON4 NECTED TOTAL DISABILITY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 108(f) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by in7 serting ‘‘or if such discharge resulted from an individual 

8 having a service-connected total disability that is perma9 nent in nature as determined by the Secretary of Veterans 

10 Affairs’’ before the period at the end. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2008209EN.01006901.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/69

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 February 2008 — Semeraro v Commission

(Case F-19/06) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Appraisal - Career development report - 2003 appraisal procedure - Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Promotion - Attestation procedure)

(2008/C 209/124)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Maria Magdalena Semeraro (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and M. Velardo, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Appointing Authority's decision of 8 November 2005 rejecting the applicant's complaint against her Career Development Report for 2004

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls Ms Serrano's career development report covering the period from 1 January to 31 December 2004; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Ms Serrano's career development report covering the period from 1 January to 31 December 2004;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006, p. 30.

1

---
Thomas A. Stokes, III, Plaintiff v. Drug Safety Alliance, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UDG Healthcare PLC; Catherine Crumpton, Douglas Townsend, Jr.; and Tempusdurham, LLC ; Defendants

No. COA15-382

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: November 1, 2016

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART.
Matthew S. Lennon v. N.C. Department of Justice and The N.C. Department of Public Safety

No. 204P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2016.

Mary-Ann Leon, Attorney at Law, Charles L. McLawhorn, Attorney at Law, Greenville, for Lennon, Matthew S.

Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Department of Justice, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of May 2016 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITEDSTATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Annual Report ofPoint Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald R. Kiepert, Jr., Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.

|   | /s/ DONALD  R. KIEPERT , JR.                       |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                    |   |
|   | **Donald R. Kiepert, Jr. Chief Executive Officer** |   |

Dated: April 28, 2003