alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 14, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 55882, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. Butler Bancorp, MHC, and Butler Bancorp, Inc., both of Lowell, 
Massachusetts; to become bank holding companies by acquiring 100 
percent of the voting shares of Butler Bank, Lowell, Massachusetts.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 15, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-18694 Filed 9-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**AUGUSTUS SIMMONS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 513 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 14th day of October, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**and Motion for Leave to File Amended Section of Peti tion for Allowance of Appeal are** 

DENIED

**.**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2163

HENRI THOKA; THERESE DJUNKEU; I.C.P.T.,

Petitioners,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. 

Submitted: July 14, 2008 Decided: September 5, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,

Maryland, for Petitioners. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant

Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Mona

Maria Yousif, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Henri Thoka, Therese Djunkeu, and daughter, I.C.P.T., all

natives and citizens of Cameroon, petition for review of an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying their motion

for the Board to exercise its discretion to sua sponte reconsider

the denial of their motion to reopen. It is undisputed that

Petitioners did not file a timely motion to reconsider. See 8

C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2). However, under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), the

Board has authority sua sponte to reconsider a case in which it

issued a final decision, and Petitioners moved for the Board to

exercise this discretionary authority. We have reviewed the record

and conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review Petitioners’ claim

that the Board should have exercised its discretionary authority to

reconsider sua sponte. See Tamenut v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1000, 1004

(8th Cir. 2008) (en banc); Zhao Quan Chen v. Gonzales, 492 F.3d

153, 155 (2d Cir. 2007); Malty v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 945 n.1

(9th Cir. 2004); Harchenko v. INS, 379 F.3d 405, 410-11 (6th Cir.

2004); Enriquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 246, 249-50 (5th

Cir. 2004); Belay-Gebru v. INS, 327 F.3d 998, 1000-01 (10th Cir.

2003); Calle-Vujiles v. Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 472, 474-75 (3d Cir.

2003); Luis v. INS, 196 F.3d 36, 40-41 (1st Cir. 1999).

We accordingly dismiss the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
- 3 -

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
# C_2009044EN.01004102.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/41

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 December 2008 — Muñiz v Commission

(Case T-144/05) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a meeting of the Working Group of the ‘Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature Section (Mechanical/Miscellaneous)’ of the Customs Code Committee - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process)

(2009/C 44/70)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pablo Muñiz (Brussels, Belgium) (represented: initially by B. Dehandschutter, and subsequently by L. Defalque, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and I. Chatzigiannis, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 3 February 2005 refusing to grant access to certain documents relating to the September 2004 meeting of the Working Group of the ‘Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature Section (Mechanical/Miscellaneous)’ of the Customs Code Committee.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Commission's decision of 3 February 2005 inasmuch as it refused access to documents, ‘TAXUD/1369/2003’ relating to home cinema, ‘TAXUD/974/2004’ relating to vehicles for dual use, ‘TAXUD/1342/2003’, ‘TAXUD/2465/2004’ and ‘TAXUD/2495/2004’ relating to power supply units, ‘XXI/770/1998’ relating to incomplete ADP machines, and to the minutes of the September 2004 meeting of the Working Group of the ‘Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature Section (Mechanical/Miscellaneous)’ of the Customs Code Committee (document ‘TAXUD/3010/2004 — Annex V’); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Commission's decision of 3 February 2005 inasmuch as it refused access to documents, ‘TAXUD/1369/2003’ relating to home cinema, ‘TAXUD/974/2004’ relating to vehicles for dual use, ‘TAXUD/1342/2003’, ‘TAXUD/2465/2004’ and ‘TAXUD/2495/2004’ relating to power supply units, ‘XXI/770/1998’ relating to incomplete ADP machines, and to the minutes of the September 2004 meeting of the Working Group of the ‘Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature Section (Mechanical/Miscellaneous)’ of the Customs Code Committee (document ‘TAXUD/3010/2004 — Annex V’);

| 2. | Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs incurred by Mr Pablo Muñiz. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs incurred by Mr Pablo Muñiz.

---

(1)  OJ C 132, 28.5.2005.

1

---
# C_2012355EN.01001502.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Dura Vermeer Groep v Commission

(Case T-351/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Imputability of the unlawful conduct)

2012/C 355/27

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dura Vermeer Groep NV (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Slotboom, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by A. Bouquet and A. Nijenhuis, Agents, and by F. Wijckmans, F. Tuytschaever and L. Gyselen, lawyers, and subsequently by A. Bouquet, A. Nijenhuis and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, and by F. Wijckmans and F. Tuytschaever)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dura Vermeer Groep NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dura Vermeer Groep NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.

1

---
# CE2004070EN.01014001.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/140 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/140

---

(2004/C 70 E/143)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2774/03

by Theresa Villiers (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 September 2003)

Subject:   Classification of Hamas as a terrorist organisation

Subject:

| 1. | Does the European Commission classify Hamas as a terrorist organisation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the European Commission classify Hamas as a terrorist organisation?

| 2. | If it does not, how does the Commission justify its stance on this? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If it does not, how does the Commission justify its stance on this?

| 3. | Does the Commission believe that refusal to label Hamas as a terrorist oganisation would constitute a dangerous obstacle to peace in the Middle East at what is a crucial stage of the peace process? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the Commission believe that refusal to label Hamas as a terrorist oganisation would constitute a dangerous obstacle to peace in the Middle East at what is a crucial stage of the peace process?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(10 October 2003)

(10 October 2003)

The Union has, further to Resolution 1373(2001) of the United Nations (UN) Security Council, adopted Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (1). The Common Position provides that these specific measures apply to persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts and listed in the annex to that Common Position. That list is established and updated by Council.

1

In December 2001, the Council listed Izz al-Din al-Qassem, the terrorist wing of Hamas. On 12 September 2003, it decided to list Hamas in its entirety (2).

2

Listing essentially means that Member States offer each other the widest possible assistance in preventing and combating terrorist acts through police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters (3), and that the financial restrictions set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (4) apply.

3

4

---

(1)  OJ L 344, 28.12.2001.

1

(2)  Common Position 2003/651/CFSP, OJ L 229, 13.9.2003.

2

(3)  See for modalities of this co-operation Council Decision 2003/48/JHA, OJ L 16, 22.1.2003, p. 68.

3

(4)  OJ L 344, 28.12.2001. See also Council Decision 2003/646/EC of 12 September 2003 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2003/480/EC, OJ L 229, 13.9.2003.

4

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Review of a Program Project Grant Application.                    

*Date:*                         October 18-19, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         6 p.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center, 9751 Washingtonian Boulevard, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.                    

*Contact Person:*                         William D. Merritt, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Grants Review Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8034, MSC 8328, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-496-9767.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower. 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 31, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-17936 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1265/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1265/2014 of 26 November 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1265/2014                     

# of 26 November 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 November 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-393) the Lolo and Kootenai National Forests' Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on September 15 at 7 p.m. in Thompson Falls, Montana for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

September 15, 2005.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Thompson Falls Courthouse, 1111 Main Street, Thompson Falls, MT 59873.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Hojem, Designated Federal Official (DFO), District Ranger, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National Forest at (406) 826-3821.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics include reviewing and making recommendations on proposed RAC projects for 2006, and receiving public comment. If the meeting location is changed, notice will be posted in the local newspapers, including the Clark Fork Valley Press, and Sanders County Ledger.

Dated: September 2, 2005.

Randy Hojem,

DFO, Plains Ranger District, Lolo National Forest.

[FR Doc. 05-18291  Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
# C_2008022EN.01001102.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 December 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Wien (Austria)) — Gabriele Walderdorff v Finanzamt Waldviertel

(Case C-451/06) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 13B(b) - Exemption - Leasing and letting of immovable property - Letting of fishing rights)

(2008/C 22/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gabriele Walderdorff

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Waldviertel

Defendant:

Re:

REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling — Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Wien — Interpretation of Article 13B(b) of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Exemption from VAT —Supply of services connected with immovable property — Letting and granting for consideration of fishing rights.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13B(b) of Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted to mean that the grant for consideration, under a contract of let for a period of 10 years, of the right to fish, by the landowner in waters owned by that person, and by the holder of fishing rights in publicly owned waters, does not constitute either a leasing or a letting of immovable property, inasmuch as that grant does not confer the right to occupy the immovable property concerned and to exclude any other person from it.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135900 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 135900 

 COA: 282182 

Wayne CC: 03-012254-01

D’JUAN GARRETT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk