alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 78 E/0161)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2708/03

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 September 2003)

Subject:   City-Res Network project

The aims of the City-Res Network project included the exchange of information and good practices and raising awareness with regard to the use of alternative energies in the major cities of the European Union. It received Community funding of EUR 200 000 and ended in 2000. Could the Commission indicate what the results of this project were, which European cities were involved, what events were organised and how the funds were spent?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(23 October 2003)

The City-Res project referred to by the Honourable Member and co-financed under the Altener II programme for an amount of EUR 200 000 (1997 budget) as he mentions, started in 1998 and ended in 2000. It aimed at setting up a Union-wide network for promotion of renewable energy applications in urban areas, and bringing both existing members of the association ‘Energie-Cités’, and further cities, on board (1).

The tasks proposed and subsequently fulfilled were:

As provided in the work programme, 50 case studies within the theme of the project on cities had been completed by March 2000, and the CD-ROM containing them distributed at the Verona meeting, and also made available on the internet. A successor project, a brief description of which follows, resulted in an updated and greatly expanded version of this CD-ROM, containing 105 Best-Practice case studies in Union cities. The Commission is sending it direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.

This follow-up project, also co-ordinated by Energie-Cités (www.energie-cites.org) took the form of a larger ‘cluster’ of three distinct projects, with a total cost of EUR 1,13 million, with 50 % co-financing again from the Altener programme (Ref. B4.1030/C/00-006). The eighteen-month project ended in September 2002.

The general aims were:

The three different projects were:

Whereas the second and the third project were Pilot Actions, in the form of Regional and Local Energy Plans, including a Targeted Action on Combined Heat and Power Production (CHP), City-RES 2001 was again mainly a Promotion and Dissemination Activity, with special emphasis on support to the Campaign for Take-Off for Renewables managed by the Commission. In addition to relevant events, and further networking, the major deliverable of the project was the CD-ROM of 105 city best-practice cases referred to above.

----

(1)  Reference B4.1030/Z/1998-07.

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 178 (Thursday, September 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18494]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and 
Community Service gives notice of the following meeting:

Date and Time: Wednesday, September 21, 2005, 9:30 a.m.-11:30 a.m.

Place: Wyndham Washington DC; Monticello West Room; 1400 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: 

I. Chair's Opening Remarks
II. Consideration of Prior Meeting's Minutes
III. Committee Reports
IV. CEO Report
V. Public Comment

Accommodations: Anyone who needs an interpreter or other accommodation 
should notify the Corporation's contact person by 5 p.m. Monday, 
September 19, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Premo, Public Affairs Associate, 
Public Affairs, Corporation for National and Community Service, 10th 
Floor, Room 10302E, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525. 
Phone (202) 606-6717. Fax (202) 606-3460. TDD: (202) 606-3472. E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80e4f0f2e5edefc0e3eef3aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7511050710181a35161b065b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
Frank R. Trinity,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-18494 Filed 9-13-05; 3:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE of North Carolina v. Tony Eugene HOWELL.

No. 436P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Tony Eugene Howell, for Howell, Tony Eugene.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 28th of December 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Alexander County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 11, 2014

No. 04-14-00317-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M., B.M., AND E.M., Children,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-00328

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The 

appellant’s brief is due on June 30, 2014.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2011311EN.01003201.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Deltafina v Commission

(Case T-12/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Immunity from fines - Cooperation - Fines - Proportionality - Gravity of the infringement - Attenuating circumstances)

2011/C 311/53

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deltafina SpA (Orvieto, Italy) (represented by: R. Jacchia, A. Terranova, I. Van Bael, J.-F. Bellis and F. Di Gianni, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by A. Whelan and F. Amato, subsequently by A. Whelan and V. Di Bucci, and finally by É. Gippini Fournier and L. Malferrari, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment or, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on Deltafina by Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2005) 4012 final of 20 October 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) [EC] (Case COMP/C.38.281/B.2 — Raw tobacco — Italy).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Deltafina SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deltafina SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.

1

---
STATE v. Michael Ray KING.

No. 190P13-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Michael Ray King, Bunn, for King, Michael Ray.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Todd Williams, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of September 2015 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
# C_2011145EN.01001902.xml

| 14.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2011 — Legris Industries v Commission

(Case T-376/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Copper and copper alloy fittings sector - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Imputability of the infringement)

2011/C 145/27

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Legris Industries SA (Rennes, France) (represented initially by A. Wachsmann and C. Pommiès, and subsequently by A. Wachsmann and A. Carré, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and A. Nijenhuis, acting as Agents, and by N. Coutrelis, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2006) 4180 of 20 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F-1/38.121 — Fittings).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Legris Industries SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Legris Industries SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.

1

---
State v. Dakota Covington

127P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Dakota Covington, Pro Se.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Trey Robison, District Attorney, For State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of April 2016 by Defendant for Evidentiary Hearing:

*383"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
* Pursuantto 5TH CIR.R.47.5,the court has determined thatthis opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances setforth

in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1

386 U.S. 738 (1967). United States v. Rodriguez-Flores, 236 F. App’x 138

(2007).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10181

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, also known as Memo

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CR-378-2

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal

of Guillermo Rodriguez-Flores pursuant to Anders v. California.

1 The Supreme

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 12, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-10181

2

552 U.S. __, 128 S.Ct. 586 (2008).

3 See U.S. v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 530 F.3d 381, 385-89 (5th Cir. 2008).

2

Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Gall v. United

States.

2

We have reconsidered this matter in light of Gall. However, nothing in the

Supreme Court’s Gall decision requires us to change our prior opinion in this

case.3 Accordingly, we reinstate the prior opinion. Counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL is DISMISSED.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 67 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the 

Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total 

to travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same 

extent as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel 

on such aircraft. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for Mr. INOUYE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former 

members of the Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent as 

retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to 

travel on such aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 67 IS 

1 SECTION 1. TRAVEL ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT OF CERTAIN 

2 DISABLED FORMER MEMBERS OF THE 

3 ARMED FORCES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 53 of title 10, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1060b 

6 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 1060c. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled 

8 former members of the armed forces 

9 ‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall permit any former 

10 member of the armed forces who is entitled to compensa11 tion under the laws administered by the Secretary of Vet12 erans Affairs for a service-connected disability rated as 

13 total to travel, in the same manner and to the same extent 

14 as retired members of the armed forces, on unscheduled 

15 military flights within the continental United States and 

16 on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility 

17 Command. The Secretary of Defense shall permit such 

18 travel on a space-available basis.’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

21 after the item relating to section 1060b the following new 

22 item: 

‘‘1060c. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled former members of the 

armed forces.’’. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3771 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3771

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
  for the relief of victims of the Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2013

 Mr. Swalwell of California (for himself, Mr. Thompson of California, 
  Mr. Issa, Mr. Heck of Nevada, Mr. Honda, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Ms. 
 Speier, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Ms. Chu, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Al Green of 
  Texas, Ms. Hanabusa, and Mr. Vargas) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition 
    to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
  for the relief of victims of the Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Philippines Charitable Giving 
Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCELERATION OF INCOME TAX BENEFITS FOR CHARITABLE CASH 
              CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF OF VICTIMS OF TYPHOON HAIYAN IN 
              THE PHILIPPINES.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, a taxpayer may treat any contribution described 
in subsection (b) made after January 1, 2014, and before March 1, 2014, 
as if such contribution was made on December 31, 2013, and not in 2014.
    (b) Contribution Described.--A contribution is described in this 
subsection if such contribution is a cash contribution made for the 
relief of victims in the Republic of the Philippines affected by 
Typhoon Haiyan, for which a charitable contribution deduction is 
allowable under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    (c) Recordkeeping.--In the case of a contribution described in 
subsection (b), a telephone bill showing the name of the donee 
organization, the date of the contribution, and the amount of the 
contribution shall be treated as meeting the recordkeeping requirements 
of section 170(f)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    (d) Paygo.--All applicable provisions in this section are 
designated as an emergency for purposes of pay-as-you-go principles.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         The  undersigned  Director of Supertel  Hospitality,  Inc.,  a Delaware
corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints Paul J. Schulte as Attorney-in-Fact
in his name,  place and stead to execute  Supertel's  Annual Report on Form 10-K
for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  1998,  together  with  any and all
subsequent amendments thereof, in his capacity as a director and hereby ratifies
all that said Attorney-in-Fact may do by virtue thereof.

         In witness  whereof,  the undersigned has hereunto signed this power of
attorney this 19th day of March, 1999.


                                             /s/ Loren Steele
                                             ----------------------------------
                                              Loren Steele



<PAGE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

					NO.	2-08-102-CR

LUTHOR DALE SIMPSON 	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY  

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT	 

ON PERMANENT ABATEMENT OF APPEAL

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s "Motion To Permanently Abate Appeal.”  A copy of the certificate of death states that appellant died on May 24, 2008. 

	The death of an appellant during the pendency of an appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction.  Molitor v. State, 862 S.W.2d 615, 616 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993).  Under these circumstances, the appropriate disposition is the permanent abatement of the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(2).  	

	No decision of this court having been delivered prior to the receipt of this motion, the court finds the motion to permanently abate the appeal should be granted.  It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal is permanently abated.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 26, 2008
# CE2004088EN.01045301.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/453 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/453

---

(2004/C 88 E/0464)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3179/03

by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   Cambodian deadlock

Subject:

Has the Commission made representations to the Cambodian authorities in order to help solve the current constitutional deadlock, especially in the context of the country's troubled and violent history?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(12 November 2003)

(12 November 2003)

The Commission and Member States represented in Phnom Penh are following the recent political developments in Cambodia closely. Commission representatives have on several occasions encouraged all political parties to do their utmost, in a peaceful manner, to find an agreement on the formation of a new government reflecting the wishes of the electorate.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136305 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136305 

 COA: 281974 

Wayne CC: 05-004396-FH

MARK THOMPKINS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 29, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006). 

p0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GameTech International, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended October 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clarence H. Thiesen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





Date:
January 29, 2003

| | /s/CLARENCE H. THIESENClarence H. Thiesen Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
# C_2008008EN.01003102.xml

| 12.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/31

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 November 2007 — Carpi Badía v Commission

(Case F-110/06) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Priority points - Incomplete personal file - Omission of priority points from the computer promotion file known as ‘Sysper 2’ - Technical problem - A* Promotion Committee - Allocation of a lower number of points than had been proposed by the applicant's superiors)

(2008/C 8/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: José María Carpi Badía (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: B. Cortese and C. Cortese, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and K. Herrmann)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Appointing Authority's decision to allocate to the applicant, an official of the Commission who had been omitted in error from the promotion list in his Directorate-General, fewer priority points than the latter wished to give him and which were insufficient to allow his promotion in the 2005 exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities allocating to Mr Carpi Badía an insufficient number of points to allow his promotion in the 2005 exercise; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities allocating to Mr Carpi Badía an insufficient number of points to allow his promotion in the 2005 exercise;

| 2. | Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities fixing the list of officials promoted in the 2005 exercise, published in Informations Administratives No 85-2005 of 23 November 2005, in so far as it does not contain Mr Carpi Badía's name; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities fixing the list of officials promoted in the 2005 exercise, published in Informations Administratives No 85-2005 of 23 November 2005, in so far as it does not contain Mr Carpi Badía's name;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and to pay those of Mr Carpi Badía. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to bear its own costs and to pay those of Mr Carpi Badía.

---

(1)  OJ C 281 of 18.11.2006, p 48.

1

---