alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18127]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5188]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Elizabeth Murray''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
[79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459], Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 [112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.], Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 [64 FR 56014], Delegation of 
Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 [64 FR 57920], as amended, and 
Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I 
hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition, 
``Elizabeth Murray,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign lenders. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the 
Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about October 23, 
2005, to on or about January 9, 2006, and at possible additional venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of 
these determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/453-8052, and the address is United 
States Department of State, SA-44, Room 700, 301 4th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: September 7, 2005.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-18127 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18543]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-57,366]


Office Depot, Inc. Torrance, CA; Dismissal of Application for 
Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Office Depot, Inc., Torrance, 
California. The application contained no new substantial information 
which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. 
Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-57,366; Office Depot, Inc. Torrance, California (September 1, 
2005)

    Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of September 2005.
Timothy Sullivan,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-18543 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 10180 and # 10181] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 1. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1605-DR), dated 08/29/2005. 

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Katrina.                     

*Incident Period:*                         08/29/2005 and continuing.                     

*Effective Date:*                         09/08/2005.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/28/2005.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/29/2006.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Alabama, dated 08/29/2005, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster: 

Primary Counties: 

Choctaw, Clarke, Greene, Hale, Pickens, Sumter, Tuscaloosa.

Contiguous Counties: 

Alabama, Bibb, Fayette, Jefferson, Lamar, Marengo, Perry, Walker, Wilcox.

Mississippi, Clarke, Kemper, Lauderdale, Lowndes, Noxubee.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-18436 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54380-54381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7968-6]


Omega Chemical Superfund Site; Notice of Proposed CERCLA 
Administrative De Minimis Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i),

[[Page 54381]]

notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement for 
recovery of past response costs concerning the Omega Chemical Site in 
Whittier, Los Angeles County, California with 171 de minimis settling 
parties. The settlement is entered into pursuant to Section 122(g) of 
CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(g) and it requires the settling parties to pay 
$10,189,384 to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 
The settlement includes a covenant not to sue the settling parties 
pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). For thirty 
(30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency 
will receive written comments relating to the settlement. The Agency 
will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its 
consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or 
considerations which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, 
improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any comments received 
will be available for public inspection at 75 Hawthorne Street, San 
Francisco, CA 94105.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 14, 2005.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is available for public inspection 
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. A 
copy of the proposed settlement may be obtained from Thanne Cox, EPA 
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, ORC-3, San Francisco, CA 94105, 
telephone number 415-972-3908. Comments should reference the Omega 
Chemical Superfund Site, Whittier, California and EPA Docket No. 2004-
13 and should be addressed to Thanne Cox at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thanne Cox, Assistant Regional Counsel 
(ORC-3), Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105; phone: (415) 972-3908; fax: (415) 947-
3570; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#284b4750064d444152494a4d5c40684d5849064f475e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ffcf0e7b1faf3f6e5fefdfaebf7dffaeffeb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 1, 2005.
Keith Takata,
Director, Superfund Division, U.S. EPA, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 05-18237 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, David P. Anastasi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    DAVID P. ANASTASI             
|David P. Anastasi                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer



August 9, 2004
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 41038 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MANUEL ANTONIO FUENTES

- RAMOS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:17

- CR

- 640

- 1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Antonio
Fuentes

- Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Fuentes

- Ramos has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Fuentes

- Ramos ’ s response . We concur with

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 29, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-41038 Document: 00514490021 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/29/2018N o. 17

- 41038

2 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Acco rdingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-41038 Document: 00514490021 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/29/2018
Exhibit 31.01

                            CERTIFICATION

I, Tom Hofer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB of Vendalux Corporation

2.  Based on my knowledge, this Annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual
report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this Annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: July 20, 2005

By: /s/
   ---------------------------------
   Tom Hofer
   (Chief Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# CE2004078EN.01044101.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/441 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/441

---

(2004/C 78 E/0463)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2903/03

by Miet Smet (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(1 October 2003)

Subject:   Suspension of cooperation agreements and postponement of their signature

Subject:

In its answer to my Question E-0520/03 (1) of 13 February 2003 about respect for women's rights in Pakistan, the Council has told me that, so far, not one agreement with a third country in which a human rights clause has been incorporated as an ‘essential element’ has been suspended.

1

It is true that the EU has in a number of cases where the essential elements of the agreement have been infringed suspended some provisions of the agreement. This was the case for the financial provisions of the Cotonou Agreement with Zimbabwe (2002), Comoros (2000), Côte d'Ivoire (2000), Fiji (2000), Haiti (2000) and Liberia (2001). What infringements of essential elements took place in these six countries?

In the case of Croatia (1995), Pakistan (1999), Algeria (1998) and Russia (1995) the signature of the cooperation agreements was postponed because of concern about human rights. ‘Human rights’ is of course a broad term. What kind of infringements of human rights were involved in this case in these four countries?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(25 November 2003)

(25 November 2003)

The Commission places great emphasis on the human rights clause in agreements of the Community with third countries as a positive instrument to promote human rights and democracy. Structured exchanges on the basis of the clause with third countries offer a more realistic way of realising the goals of the human rights' clause than the application of rigid criteria for the suspension of parts of an agreement. Nevertheless, the Commission agrees that there are circumstances when punitive measures may be required. Where such measures are eventually taken after careful assessment of the prevailing particular situation in a country, it is important that timely consideration is given not only to the impact of the measures but also as to what conditions will govern their lifting.

Since 1996, the human rights clause has been invoked on a number of occasions, including in the case of the countries mentioned by the Honourable Member, for justifying the request for formal consultations with a third country, or suspending cooperation and imposing other sanctions. In all of these cases, the political, democratic and human rights situations in the respective country were carefully assessed. In doing so, the Commission avoided employing any ‘mechanistic’ or ‘typological’ approach, which would have failed to provide the necessary comprehensive appreciation of a precarious situation in third country concerned.

The Commission pursues the same approach in deciding on whether to slow down or suspend negotiations on a bilateral agreement or the signature of such an agreement, as mentioned by the Honourable Member.

---

(1)  OJ C 280 E, 21.11.2003, p. 62.

1

---
# C_2008142EN.01002102.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 1 April 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema Di Cassazione — Italy) — Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzie delle Entrate v Porto Antico di Genova SpA

(Case C-149/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 142/35)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 310, 16.12.2006.

1

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LUIS MANUEL TEJADA a/k/a LUIS TEJADA and NOBELLA JOSEFINA

OLLER TEJADA a/k/a NOBELLA J. TEJADA, his wife, Appellant s ,

v.

HELM BANK USA, a Florida corporation f/k/a HELM BANK,

a Florida corporation

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1069

[ March 15, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 17309

CACE 11

.

Kenneth Eric Trent, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant s

.

Juan Ramirez, Jr. of ADR Miami, LLC, Coral Gables, and Manuel A. Ramirez of Castro & Ramirez, Coral Gables, fo r appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, T AYLOR and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 99.18
 CONSENT OF M. M. VERMA
   1.
    
    The technical report dated February 13, 2009 entitled An Updated
Technical Report on the Mineral Reserves of Minera Alumbrera Ltd.,
Catamarca, Argentina (the Alumbrera Report); and2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection
with information relating to the Alumbrera Report and the Alumbrera
Mine, and the properties described therein.
  /s/ Mani M. VermaName:
    Mani M. Verma, P. Eng.Title:
    Associate
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3410

_____________________________ S TEVEN P. M C K ENNEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court f or Duval County

. Bruce Anderson , Judge

. January 7, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. W ETHERELL , O STERHAUS , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Steven P. McKenney, pro se
, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3721 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3721

 To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained by the 
  United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United 
        States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 8 (legislative day, November 20), 2008

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of funds to transfer individuals detained by the 
  United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United 
        States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO TRANSFER INDIVIDUALS DETAINED 
              AT GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA, TO THE UNITED STATES 
              DISCIPLINARY BARRACKS, FORT LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS.

    None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to any 
Federal department or agency may be used to transfer any individual 
detained by the United States at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 
to the United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.
                                 <all>
```