alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of partially closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors will meet to make 
such inquiry, as the Board shall deem necessary into the state of 
morale and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, 
fiscal affairs, and academic methods of the Naval Academy. The meeting 
will include discussions of personnel issues at the Naval Academy, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy. The executive session of this meeting will be closed 
to the public.

DATES: The open session of the meeting will be held on Tuesday, 
September 20, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. The closed Executive 
Session will be held on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, from 10:30 a.m. to 
12:15 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in 385 Russell Senate Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20510.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Marc D. Boran, 
Executive Secretary to the Board of Visitors, Office of the 
Superintendent, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000, 410-293-
1503.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of meeting is provided per the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). The executive session 
of the meeting will consist of discussions of personnel issues at the 
Naval Academy and internal Board of Visitors matters. Discussion of 
such information cannot be adequately segregated from other topics, 
which precludes opening the executive session of this meeting to the 
public. Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in 
writing that the meeting shall be partially closed to the public 
because it will be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(2), 
(5), (6), (7) and (9) of title 5, United States Code.

    Dated: September 12, 2005.
I.C. Le Moyne Jr.,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18537 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
State of North Carolina v. Howard Cleveland, Jr.

No. 248P99-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Howard Cleveland, Jr., Pro Per.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 28th of March 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Rowan County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 7 

To amend title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 and other laws 

and provisions and urge Congress to make college more affordable 

through increased Federal Pell Grants and providing more favorable 

student loans and other benefits, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. CLINTON, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. AKAKA, Ms. CANTWELL, 

Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. 

STABENOW, Mr. WEBB, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. SANDERS, 

Mr. REED, Mr. DODD, and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

and other laws and provisions and urge Congress to 

make college more affordable through increased Federal 

Pell Grants and providing more favorable student loans 

and other benefits, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘College Opportunity 

5 Act of 2007’’. 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 7 IS

1 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

2 It is the sense of Congress that the Congress should 

3 enact, and the President should sign, legislation to amend 

4 title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 and other 

5 laws and provisions to make college more affordable 

6 through increased Federal Pell Grants and providing more 

7 favorable student loans and other benefits. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
# C_2009069EN.01000802.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 January 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — STEKO Industriemontage GmbH v Finanzamt Speyer-Germersheim

(Case C-377/07) (1)

1

(Corporation tax - Transitional provisions - Deduction of the depreciation of holdings in non-resident companies)

(2009/C 69/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: STEKO Industriemontage GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Speyer-Germersheim

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Article 56 EC — Corporation tax — Transitional provisions for the year 2001 prohibiting a company from deducting the depreciation in value of its foreign shareholdings

Operative part of the judgment

In circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, in which a resident capital company has a holding of less than 10 % in another capital company, Article 56 EC must be interpreted as precluding a prohibition on the deduction of reductions in profit in connection with such a holding which enters into force earlier with regard to a holding in a non-resident company than with regard to a holding in a resident company.

---

(1)  OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CPI International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 28, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Joel A. Littman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/
      JOEL A. LITTMANJoel
      A. LittmanChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      7, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18648]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet in Willows, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Project 
Proposal/Possible Action, (5) Web site Update, (6) Update on Colusa 
Title III Money, (7) General Discussion, (8) Next Agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 26, 2005, from 1:30 p.m. 
and end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. 
Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their 
names and proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., 
Willows, CA 95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbin Gaddini, Committee coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 
164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-1815; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbacacaaafafa2a5a28badb8e5adaeafe5beb8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5334343237373a3d3a1335207d3536377d2620">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the 
Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before 
or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and 
individuals who made written requests by September 23, 2005 will have 
the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
James F. Giachino,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 05-18648 Filed 9-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 
  





 
 General Manager, Yodle For Brand Networks Bonus Plan 

The Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) for the General Manager of Yodle for Brand Networks (“YBN”) is designed to motivate and reward outstanding
individual achievement, subject to the achievement of performance targets. This Plan document describes how Yodle, Inc. (the “Company”) funds the bonus pool (the “Bonus Pool”) under this Plan. The bonus allocation is subject to
manager discretion. 
 Bonus Periods: Bonuses under this Plan are measured and paid semi-annually. The first bonus period runs from January 1st through June 30th of the calendar year and the second bonus period runs from July 1st
through December 31st of the calendar year. 
 Eligibility: To be eligible for bonus
consideration, you must be employed by the Company as the General Manager, Yodle for Brand Networks (1) for at least 30 days during the applicable bonus period and (2) through the last day of the applicable bonus period. 

Target: Your semi-annual bonus target is $50,000 (the “Semi-Annual Target”). 

Performance: Performance is based on the attainment of results during the bonus period and is comprised of two primary components that are weighted
equally: (1) achievement of a revenue target (the “Revenue Target”) and (2) achievement of a contribution margin target (the “Contribution Margin Target”). The targets will be provided to you in advance of the applicable bonus
period. The amount of the Bonus Pool available for allocation will be pro-rated based on the achievement of the Revenue Target and the Contribution Margin Target. 

Management Discretion and Payment: Any bonus allocation to you is subject to manager discretion. Criteria that will influence manager discretion will
be provided to you in advance of the applicable bonus period. Any bonus awarded to you will be paid no later than 60 days after the end of the applicable bonus period. 

Bonus Pool Funding Calculation Example: 
 Note: This
example demonstrates how the Bonus Pool is funded and will be adjusted based on achievement of performance targets. 
 EXAMPLE: 

 

	 	•	 	Semi-Annual Target: $50,000 

  

	 	•	 	Performance: 80% of Revenue Target and 110% of Contribution Margin Target 

  

	 	•	 	The amount to fund the Bonus Pool is $47,500 ((50% * $50,000)*80%) + ((50% * 50,000)*110%)) 


General: All payments are subject to all applicable deductions and withholdings. This Plan does not constitute an employment contract and your
employment remains “at will”, meaning that you and the Company each retain the right to terminate your employment at any time, for any reason, without notice. This Plan may be modified or terminated by the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer at any time with or without notice.
Gretta Gay NAYLON, Plaintiff, v. Kevin James NAYLON, Defendant.

No. COA15-1247.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 21, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Vacated.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00536-CV

In re Reginald I. Bailey a/k/a Ray Hill

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Reginald I. Bailey represents himself in an appeal from an order of dismissal

entered by the 126th District Court in Travis County cause number D-1-GN-07-000300. The appeal

is pending in this Court as our cause number 03-08-00367-CV. On August 7, 2008, the clerk wrote

a letter to Bailey advising him that the clerk’s record has not been filed in his appeal because he has

not made arrangements for paying for it. Bailey responded to this letter by filing the instant petition

for writ of mandamus. In the petition, Bailey asserts that he is indigent and asks the Court to order

the preparation of a free clerk’s record.

In order to obtain the clerk’s record at no cost to himself, Bailey must file with the

district clerk an affidavit stating that he is indigent and otherwise complying with the requirements

of rule 20.1. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Absent Bailey’s compliance with this rule, the district clerk

is not obligated to prepare the record.
2

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Filed: September 11, 2008
In the Matter of Mary Lucille Hughes, by and through Virginia Hughes Ingram, Administratrix of the Estate of Mary Lucille Hughes, Claim for Compensation Under the North Carolina Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program

No. 87A16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Marc X. Sneed, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Edwin A. Pressly, Attorney at Law, Statesville, For Ingram, Virginia Hughes.

Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

*20Elizabeth M. Haddix, Attorney at Law, Pittsboro, For Ingram, Virginia Hughes (et al).

Mark Dorosin, Attorney at Law, For Ingram, Virginia Hughes (et al).

Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, For State of North Carolina.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Claimant on the 11th of March 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of March 2016 by Claimant to Consolidate Appeals:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Claimant's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
# C_2009193EN.01001601.xml

| 15.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/16

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2009 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-259/05) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Fibre flax - Hemp - Bananas - OLAF report - Report of the Court of Auditors - Bilateral meeting under Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 - Breach of essential procedural requirements - Abusive practice - Existence of financial harm to the EAGGF)

2009/C 193/21

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. Muñoz Pérez, abogado del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. van Rijn, L. Parpala and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment in part of Commission Decision 2005/354/EC of 29 April 2005 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section (OJ 2005 L 112, p. 14).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2005/354/EC of 29 April 2005 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section, in so far as it excludes from Community financing the expenditure by the Kingdom of Spain made under aid granted for the production of hemp in the years 1996/1997 to 1999/2000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2005/354/EC of 29 April 2005 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section, in so far as it excludes from Community financing the expenditure by the Kingdom of Spain made under aid granted for the production of hemp in the years 1996/1997 to 1999/2000;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 3.9.2005.

1

---
State v. Avenger Ridgeway

273A01-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Mr. Avenger D. Ridgeway, Polkton, Pro Per.

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Jon David, District Attorney, for the State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of March 2016 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

Ervin, J., recused.
HART, et al. v. STATE, et al.

No. 372A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Oct. 10, 2014.

Robert Thomas Numbers, II, Raleigh, Richard D. Komer, Narendra Ghosh, Chapel Hill, Christine Bischoff, Carlene M. McNulty, for Cynthia Perry and Gennell Curry.

Renee Flaherty.

Burton Craige, Raleigh, for Hart, et al.

Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Stephen D. Martin, Raleigh, for Perry, Cynthia, et al.

Lauren M. Clemmons, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina, et al.

Robert F. Orr, Asheville, Edwin M. Speas, Jr., Carrie Virginia McMillan, Raleigh, for Richardson, et al.

**Opinion**

Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31(a) and (b)(2) and Rule 15(e)(2) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court on its own initiative hereby certifies for review prior to determination in the Court of Appeals *Hart, et al. v. State of North Carolina,* COAP14-659. The case shall be docketed in this Court as of the date of this order. Briefs of the respective parties that have been submitted to the Court of Appeals shall be considered by this Court. Any party may file a new brief in this Court consistent with the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1120

THOMAS E. QUESENBERRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Pamela Meade Sargent,

Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00116-pms)

Submitted: August 28, 2008 Decided: September 12, 2008

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deborah K. Garton, HENSLEY, MUTH, GARTON & HAYES, Bluefield, West

Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney,

Sara Bugbee Winn, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke,

Virginia; Michael McGaughran, Regional Chief Counsel, Region III,

William Reeser, Supervisory Attorney, Michelle Scotese, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Social Security Administration,

OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas E. Quesenberry appeals the magistrate judge’s

order affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Quesenberry a

period of disability and disability insurance benefits.*

 We must

uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported

by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42

U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.

1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs,

administrative record, and the materials submitted in the joint

appendix, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.

See Quesenberry v. Astrue, No. 1:06-cv-00116-pms (W.D. Va. Oct. 10,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2008128EN.01002701.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 13 February 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-485/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 128/50)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, David E. Hooston hereby certifies as follows:



| | 1. | He is the duly appointed Chief Financial Officer of Placer Sierra Bancshares, a California corporation (the Company).
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 11thday of August 2005.



PLACER SIERRA BANCSHARES/s/ David E. HoostonDavid E. Hooston Chief Financial Officer