alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3802 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3802

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2014

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To extend the legislative authority of the Adams Memorial Foundation to 
establish a commemorative work in honor of former President John Adams 
                and his legacy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR MEMORIAL 
              ESTABLISHMENT.

    Section 1 of Public Law 107-62 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note), as amended by 
Public Law 111-169, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2020'' in 
        subsection (c); and
            (2) by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:
    ``(e) Deposit of Excess Funds for Established Memorial.--
            ``(1) If upon payment of all expenses for the establishment 
        of the memorial (including the maintenance and preservation 
        amount required by section 8906(b)(1) of title 40, United 
        States Code), there remains a balance of funds received for the 
        establishment of the commemorative work, the Adams Memorial 
        Foundation shall transmit the amount of the balance to the 
        account provided for in section 8906(b)(3) of title 40, United 
        States Code.
            ``(2) If upon expiration of the authority for the 
        commemorative work under section 8903(e) of title 40, United 
        States Code, there remains a balance of funds received for the 
        establishment of the commemorative work, the Adams Memorial 
        Foundation shall transmit the amount of the balance to a 
        separate account with the National Park Foundation for 
        memorials, to be available to the Secretary of the Interior or 
        the Administrator (as appropriate) following the process 
        provided for in section 8906(b)(4) of title 40, United States 
        Code, for accounts established under section 8906(b)(2) or (3) 
        of title 40, United States Code.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# CE2004078EN.01052501.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/525 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/525

---

(2004/C 78 E/0546)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3341/03

by Adriana Poli Bortone (UEN) to the Commission

(12 November 2003)

Subject:   Albania

Subject:

Can the Commission say whether the observers at the recent elections in Albania pointed to any significant anomalies, in particular whether:

| — | the new electoral lists were corrected, following numerous complaints, in time to ensure transparent elections with full participation by the population; |
| --- | --- |

—

the new electoral lists were corrected, following numerous complaints, in time to ensure transparent elections with full participation by the population;

| — | the procedure for the reorganisation of the central electoral committee was followed correctly; |
| --- | --- |

—

the procedure for the reorganisation of the central electoral committee was followed correctly;

| — | the rights of the opposition were respected? |
| --- | --- |

—

the rights of the opposition were respected?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(23 December 2003)

(23 December 2003)

Significant shortcomings have been identified during the last local elections in Albania, most notably during the post-election period and the issuing of the results. The re-run of elections in the Himara region on 16 November demonstrated that Albania still needs to make considerable efforts in order to guarantee full compliance with electoral standards. In early December, the Albanian Electoral Court requested the re-run of the elections in 118 voting centres in Tirana (over 30 % of the voting centres of the capital). The re-runs will take place on 28 December.

A major issue identified during the elections has been that of the voters' lists. On request of the opposition parties, the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) made last minute amendments to these lists. However, these amendments were not sufficient to guarantee satisfactory accuracy of the lists. In addition, changes were made too late, and voters were not properly informed. This led to a certain degree of confusion on the Election Day.

The reorganisation of the CEC in the run-up to the elections was controversial. Although the CEC seemed to have taken generally balanced positions during the elections, the recent decision of the Electoral Court as regards the elections in Tirana casts a shadow on the CEC's performance.

There have been efforts to respect the rights of the opposition, and the appeal procedures have been used. The request for re-runs in Tirana and the CEC's decision to change results in Himara due to serious manipulations are good examples. However, it is clear that all political actors in Albania need to be more willing, more determined and more committed to guaranteeing the successful conduct of democratic elections in the country.

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55106-55107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18718]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1412]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 247, Erie, Pennsylvania

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Erie-Western Pennsylvania Port Authority, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 247, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand FTZ 247 to include a site (Site 4 - 34 acres) at 
the Venango Regional Airport Industrial Park in the City of Franklin 
(Venango County), Pennsylvania, adjacent to the Erie Customs port of 
entry (FTZ Docket 13-2005; filed 3/11/05);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (70 FR 13450, 3/21/05) and the application has been processed

[[Page 55107]]

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 247 is approved, subject to the Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of September 2005.

Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-18718 Filed 9-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40216

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NOE TREJO; APOLINAR VILLANUEVA

Defendants-Appellants

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CR-696-1

USDC No. 2:06-CR-696-2

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Apolinar Villanueva has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Villanueva has not filed a response. Our independent

review ofthe record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40216

2

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
----

(2004/C 65 E/233)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2786/03

by Manuel dos Santos (PSE) to the Commission

(17 September 2003)

Subject:   Revision of the stability and growth programme

The Portuguese authorities recently made a public announcement to the effect that the Commission had been notified of a budget deficit for the current year equivalent to 2,944 % of GDP.

This percentage was achieved only through the inclusion of exceptional revenue, an operation which evidently cannot be repeated.

Such revenue includes the Government's intention to incorporate the CTT pension fund into state revenue, amounting to around EUR 930 million, or 0,7 % of GDP.

It appears that authorisation for this financial operation has already been requested from the Commission.

The Commission:

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(13 Oktober 2003)

On 1 September 2003, Portugal reported to the Commission that their planned government deficit for 2003 was 2,9 % of the gross domestic product (GDP). Moreover, the Portuguese authorities informed that this projection includes receipts of EUR 930 million (equivalent to 0,7 % of GDP) to be paid by the public enterprise CTT to Caixa Geral de Aposentações (the civil servants social insurance scheme). This payment is in exchange of the transfer of pension responsibility vis-à-vis the CTT employees that have civil servant status.

The deficit figures that are reported by the Member States to the Commission, and which are the basis for assessing the respect of the Stability and Growth Pact, should be established according to the rules of the European System of National and Regional Accounts (or ESA95) (1). When the ESA95 rules do not cover any specific transaction, the respective accounting treatment is decided by Eurostat, on behalf of the Commission, in accordance with the Code of Best Practice on the compilation and reporting of data in the context of the excessive deficit procedure adopted by the Council on 18 February 2003. The procedure leading to the decision on the accounting treatment usually involves the creation of a small technical task force and the consultation of the Committee on Monetary, Financial and Balance of Payment Statistics (CMFB). This procedure can be initiated either at the request of Member States, or by the Commission (Eurostat).

ESA95 does not provide clear guidance on the accounting treatment of transactions which involve lumpsum payments to government in exchange of the transfer of the responsibility for future pension systems. Therefore, in April 2003, it was decided to clarify the accounting treatment of these operations and to launch the above-described procedure. A task force — which included one representative of the Portuguese statistical institute — met in June 2003 and the CMFB will be consulted shortly. Although no date has been announced, the decision on the accounting treatment of these transactions will be made public this autumn.

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2223/96 of 25 June 1996 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the Community, OJ L 310, 30.11.1996.

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, O. JoeCaldarelli, certify that:

1.                  Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CPI International, Inc.;

2.                  Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

3.                  Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)               Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date:  | August 13, 2007 |                                        | Signature: |   | /s/ O. Joe Caldarelli |
|--------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------|------------|--------|----------------------------|
|   |            | O. Joe  Caldarelli, Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
STATE v. BRADDY.

No. COA08-333.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Robeson (04CRS5629, 04CRS6107).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,403
<SECURITIES>                                     2,947
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                       602
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,897
<PP&E>                                          12,209
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,669
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,087
<SALES>                                          8,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,350
<CGS>                                              570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                       738
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,129
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14



</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 313 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3865 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2014 

Received; read the first time 

MARCH 3, 2014 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from modifying 

the standard for determining whether an organization 

is operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare 

for purposes of section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Targeting of Po5 litical Beliefs by the IRS Act of 2014’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 3865 PCS

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABLE STANDARD FOR DETERMINATIONS OF 

2 WHETHER AN ORGANIZATION IS OPERATED 

3 EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SO4 CIAL WELFARE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The standard and definitions as 

6 in effect on January 1, 2010, which are used to determine 

7 whether an organization is operated exclusively for the 

8 promotion of social welfare for purposes of section 

9 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall 

10 apply for purposes of determining the status of organiza11 tions under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue 

12 Code of 1986 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (b) PROHIBITION ON MODIFICATION OF STAND14 ARD.—The Secretary of the Treasury may not (nor may 

15 any delegate of such Secretary) issue, revise, or finalize 

16 any regulation (including the proposed regulations pub17 lished at 78 Fed. Reg. 71535 (November 29, 2013)), rev18 enue ruling, or other guidance not limited to a particular 

19 taxpayer relating to the standard and definitions specified 

20 in subsection (a). 

21 (c) APPLICATION TO ORGANIZATIONS.—Except as 

22 provided in subsection (d), this section shall apply with 

23 respect to any organization claiming tax exempt status 

24 under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

25 1986 which was created on, before, or after the date of 

26 the enactment of this Act. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

HR 3865 PCS

1 (d) SUNSET.—This section shall not apply after the 

2 one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Calendar No. 313 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3865 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from 

1986. tion 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of promotion of social welfare for purposes of secan organization is operated exclusively for the modifying the standard for determining whether 

MARCH 3, 2014 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60171

Summary Calendar

FARHAD FIROOZFAR

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A37 838 325

Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner Farhad Firoozfar, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeal’ (“BIA”), which denied his

request for a waiver of inadmissibility under former § 212(c) of the Immigration

and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c), because Petitioner’s conviction

for aggravated sexual assault of a child lacks a comparable ground of

inadmissibility under INA § 212(a). Firoozfar argues that the BIA’s

interpretation of 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(5) and its decision in Matter of Blake, 23

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 15, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-60171

2

I&N Dec. 722, 729 (BIA 2005), constitute “an impermissibly retroactive removal

of individual rights which patently contradicts Board, Federal and Supreme

Court precedent, creates a new bar to eligibility for a statutory right with no

statutory basis, and violates the equal protection clause.”

The same arguments were raised and rejected in Avilez-Granados v.

Gonzales, 481 F.3d 869, 870 (5th Cir. 2007), and its companion case,

Vo v. Gonzales, 482 F.3d 363, 366-68 (5th Cir. 2007); see also Cantu v. Mukasey,

No. 06-61080, 267 Fed. Appx. 321, 2008 WL 474170 (5th Cir. Feb. 20, 2008)

(recognizing that Avilez and Vo foreclose the same arguments made by Firoozfar

despite Blake v. Carbone, 489 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2007)(vacating Matter of Blake)).

Accordingly, there is no textual link between sexual abuse of a child and crimes

involving moral turpitude to indicate that Congress had the same class of

offenses in mind when it enacted the two provisions that must be compared.

Therefore, the BIA did not err in denying Firoozfar relief under former § 212(c).

Firoozfar also challenges the BIA’s decision on the grounds that his

vacated conviction is not a conviction for immigration purposes. However, the

BIA’s determination that the conviction was valid for immigration purposes is

consistent with the precedent of this court. See Renteria-Gonzalez v. INS,

322 F.3d 804, 814 (5th Cir. 2002); see also Discipio v. Ashcroft, 417 F.3d 448, 450

(5th Cir. 2005) (stating that “a panel of this Court is without authority to

contradict the holding of the previous panel in Renteria-Gonzalez”).

Firoozfar’s petition for review is DENIED.
State of North Carolina v. Archimede Ngadiene Nkiam

No. 385PA15

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed September 23, 2016

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Hale Blau & Saad, Raleigh, by Daniel M. Blau and Robert H. Hale, Jr., for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice ERVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.