alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
 Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243. Proposed Project: Survey of Single State Authorities Regarding the HIV Set-Aside of the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant—NEW The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA), Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) administers the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment (SAPT) Block Grant. This is a major source of funding for substance abuse activities in 60 jurisdictions, including all States and Territories. As part of the SAPT Block Grant, States with an AIDS case rate of 10 per 100,000 of population are required to set-aside a portion of SAPT Block Grant funding for early Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) intervention. States that qualify are required to expend 2-5 percent of their yearly SAPT Block Grant funding on HIV Early Intervention Services (EIS) projects. The purpose of the survey is to assess the status of HIV Services in substance abuse treatment systems in the States and Territories; including how HIV Set-Aside funds are being utilized, and what results are being accomplished through EIS, including counseling, testing, and treatment, and staff and program development. A questionnaire will be sent to the director of each Single State Authority for the SAPT Block Grant in the 60 States and Territories, with responses expected over a two-week period. Below is the table of the estimated total burden hours: Respondent
Number of respondents
Number of responses per respondent
Average burden hour
Estimated total burden 
                             (hours)State Manager
60
1
1
60
 Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, Room 71-1045, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Dated: September 9, 2005. Anna Marsh, Executive Officer, SAMHSA.


[FR Doc. 05-18405 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 5, 2006


                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 5, 2006
**Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 April 2008 – Commission v Belgium**

**(Case C‐522/06)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 – Substances that deplete the ozone layer – Recovery, recycling, reclamation and destruction of those substances

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 19)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer (OJ 2000 L 244, p. 1) – Articles 16(5) and 17(1) – Failure to adopt measures defining the minimum qualification requirements for personnel responsible for recovery, recycling, reclamation and destruction of controlled substances referred to in Article 2 of the regulation and contained in refrigeration, air-conditioning and heat pump equipment, fire protection systems and fire extinguishers – Failure to adopt all precautionary measures practicable to prevent and minimise leakages of controlled substances and absence of checks on the possible presence of leakages. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that: |

– by failing to define the minimum qualification requirements for certain members of personnel working in recovery, recycling,
reclamation and destruction of controlled substances in accordance with Article 16(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer, and

– in respect of the Walloon Region, by failing to take all precautionary measures practicable to prevent and minimise leakages
of controlled substances and by failing to carry out annual checks to establish the presence of leakages in accordance with
Article 17(1) of Regulation No 2037/2000,

the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the provisions of that regulation;

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
STATE of North Carolina v. Cotey Lee DUNLAP.

No. COA15-372.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 20, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 12-1



CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



|                                                   |  | Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                                   |  |                              
|(Dollars in thousands)                             |  |                              
|                                                   |  |                              
|                                                  
|Earnings before fixed charge:                      |  |                              
|Income (loss) before taxes and extraordinary items |  | $                            
|Fixed Charges                                      |  |                              
|                                                   |  |                              
|                                                   |  | $                            
|                                                   |  |                              
|                                                  
|Fixed Charges:                                     |  |                              
|Interest expense                                   |  | $                            
|Interest component of rent expensed(1)             |  |                              
|                                                   |  |                              
|                                                   |  | $                            
|                                                   |  |                              
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2)              |  |                              
|                                                   |  |                              



|(1) |  | Calculated as one-third of total rent expense.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges for the years ended January 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 by $84,540, $205,264 and $47,460, respectively.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 22 May 2008 – NewSoft Technology v OHIM – Soft (Presto! BizCard
Reader)**

**(Case T-205/06)**

Community trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Community word mark Presto! BizCard Reader – Earlier national figurative marks Presto – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds of invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier trade mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 65-67)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 May 2006 (Case R 601/2005‐2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Soft, SA and NewSoft Technology Corp. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Registered Community trade mark of which cancellation sought: | Word mark Presto! BizCard Reader for goods and services in Classes 9, 16 and 42 – Application No 2625457 |
| Proprietor of the Community trade mark: | NewSoft Technology Corp. |
| Party bringing the action for cancellation: | Soft, SA |
| Trade marks of the applicant for cancellation: | Spanish figurative mark Presto for goods and services in Classes 9 and 42 |
| Decision of the Cancellation Division: | Community trade mark cancelled |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders NewSoft Technology Corp. to pay the costs. |
T h i s pr oce edi n g a r i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 94- 0857- CR , s t y l ed The St at e of Texas v. D er ek B ai l ey , f i l ed i n t he 1 2 5 th J u d ic ia l D istric t C o u rt, G u a d a lup e C o u n ty, T e x a s. i i i i i i



## MEM ORA ND UMOP INION No . 0 4- 08 -0 04 76 -C R IN RE Der ek BA ILEY Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 

### PER C URIAM Sitt ing: Alma L . L ópez , Chief J ustice

Sandee B ryan Marion, J ustice Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J uly 23, 2008 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On J uly 7, 2008, relator filed a pe tition for writ of mandamus a sking this cour t to order ( 1) the tr ia l c ourt

to r ule on his mot ion

fo r n e w tri a l and

(2 ) t he dis tr ic t c le rk

to f ile and fo rw ard to t his
c ourt a no tic e of a pp e a l. R e lator

ha s no t pr ov ide d thi s c ourt wi th a c op y of his mot ion

fo r n e w tri a l, which he a lleg es he filed on J une 30, 2004. A motion for new trial “not timely ruled on by written order will be deeme d denied” by operation of law. SeeT EX 

### . R. A PP 

### . P. 21.8. Th i s cou r t do es no t hav e j uri sdict i on t o issue a w r i t of m and am us a g ai nst a distr i ctcl er k un l ess
s u c h w rit is n e c e s s a ry to e n fo rc e o u r ju ris d ic tio n . I n r e Cor onado , 9 8 0 S .W.2 d 6 9 1 , 6 9 2 (T e x . A p p .— S an A n ton io 1 9 9 8 , o ri g. p roc eed ing). R elato r h as n o t asserted that the w ri t he is req u estin g is n ece ssa ry to en fo rc e o u r ju ris d ic tio n , n o r h a s h e p ro v id e d a re c o rd th a t w o u ld su p p o rt su c h a n argu m e n t. W alker04
- 08
- 00 47 6- CR

- 2- v. Pa cker , 8 2 7 S
. W.2 d 8 3 3 , 8 3 7 (T ex . 1 9 9 2 ) (ho ldin g relator h as b u rde n o f p rov idin g a su ff icien t r eco rd t o 

### establish right to mandamus relief ). F or the se re a so ns , th is c ourt

ha s d e te rm ine d that re lator is n ot e nti tle d to the re lie f s ou ght, and the pe tition i s DENI ED. T EX 

### . R. A PP 

### . P. 52.8(a).



## PER CURI AM D o no t pu

bli sh
# C_2008158EN.01002202.xml

| 21.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/22

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 April 2008 — Republic of Poland v Commission

(Case T-41/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 158/37)

Language of the case: Polish

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN TV Corp. for the three monthsended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, Vincent L. Sadusky, Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer of the Company, and hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 9, 2006     /s/ Vincent L. Sadusky     Vincent L. Sadusky  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Harold Bright HARRIS, Jr. v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Division of Adult Prisons; Lawrence Parsons.

No. 349P12-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 30, 2015.

Anita LeVeaux, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Harold Bright Harris, Jr., for Harris, Harold Bright, Jr.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 23rd of November 2015 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Forsyth County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of November 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
f8k120210ex10iii_celsius.htm


Exhibit 10.3







ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Addendum to Employment Agreement is made on this 2nd day of December, 2010, between Celsius Holdings, Inc. (“Employer”) and Janice Haley (“Employee”).







WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement on December 15, 2009; and,







WHEREAS, Employer wishes to continue employing Employee and Employee wishes to continue to be employed pursuant to the terms of this Employment Agreement.







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Addendum to Employment Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:







Section 4.1. Base Salary, shall be modified as of December 3, 2010, to an annual base salary of $96,000; provided that, upon the closing of a change of control event, as defined in section 9.4. (a), or at closing of a transaction whereby the Employer sells all material intellectual property, Employer shall pay Employee the difference between Employee’s prior annual base salary of $120,000.00 and the $96,000.00 annual base salary agreed to herein, multiplied by the full and partial years from December 3, 2010 to the date of any such closing.







Section 9.1, Term of Employment, shall be modified and the end-of-employment date shall be December 31, 2011, unless extended or terminated sooner, as provided by this article of the Employment Agreement.







No other terms will be modified and remain the same







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Employment Agreement in duplicate on the date and year first above written.







EMPLOYEE:












_____/s/ Janice Haley_____________


Janice Haley












EMPLOYER:







CELSIUS HOLDINGS, INC.












By: __/s/ Geary Cotton________________


       Geary W. Cotton, Chief Financial Officer
# Decision (EU) 2015/1574 of the European Central BankShow full title

Decision (EU) 2015/1574 of the European Central Bank of 4 September 2015 amending Decision ECB/2014/8 on the prohibition of            monetary financing and the remuneration of government deposits by national central banks (ECB/2015/29)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Decision (EU) 2015/1574 of the European Central Bank

# of 4 September 2015

# amending Decision ECB/2014/8 on the prohibition of monetary financing and the remuneration of government deposits by national                        central banks (ECB/2015/29)                     

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the second indent of Article 132(1)                           thereof,                        

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular the                           second indent of Article 34.1 thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Decision ECB/2014/8 of the European Central Bank(1) specifies the market rates that will operate as ceilings for the remuneration of deposits held by governments and public                              authorities with their national central bank (NCB). This assists the Governing Council in monitoring the NCBs' compliance                              with the prohibition on monetary financing set out in Article 123 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

(2)The Eurepo index was identified in Article 1(d) of Decision ECB/2014/8 as the secured market rate with regard to fixed term                              deposits in euro. The Eurepo index was discontinued on 2 January 2015. The secured market rate with regard to fixed term deposits                              in euro will now be the STOXX EUR GC Pooling term indices with a comparable maturity.

(3)Therefore, Decision ECB/2014/8 should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

## Article 1U.K.Amendments

Article 1(d) of Decision ECB/2014/8 is replaced by the following:

### ‘(d)“secured market rate” means: (i) with regard to fixed term deposits in euro, STOXX EUR GC Pooling term indices with a comparable                           maturity; and (ii) with regard to fixed term deposits in a different currency, a comparable rate.’

## Article 2U.K.Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 4 September 2015.

*The President of the ECB*                            

Mario Draghi                            

1

Decision ECB/2014/8 of the European Central Bank of 20 February 2014 on the prohibition of monetary financing and the remuneration                              of government deposits by national central banks (2014/303/EU) (OJ L 159, 28.5.2014, p. 54).
PIRO v. McKEEVER, et al.

No. 93A16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 20, 2016.

Andrew J. Epstein, for McKeever, Rebecca Hadden.

Michelle D. Connell, Raleigh, for Piro, Michael C.

Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, for Piro, Michael C.

Mark E. Anderson, for National Association of Social Workers.

Monica E. Webb, Raleigh, for National Association of Social Workers.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of May 2016 by National Association of Social Workers for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of May 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
# C_2008313EN.01003001.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/30

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 October 2008 — Adobe v OHIM (FLEX)

(Case T-158/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark FLEX - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 313/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Adobe Systems Inc. (San Jose, California, United States) (represented by: M. Graf and F. Wesel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, D. Botis and G. Schneider, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 April 2006 (Case R 1430/2005-2) concerning registration of the Community trade mark FLEX No 3 795 011.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Adobe Systems Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Adobe Systems Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 12.8.2006.

1

---