alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, James C. Wilson, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report of GameTech International, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 14, 2006          /s/       JAMES C. WILSON     James C. Wilson
**Exhibit32.1**

**CertificationPursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code**

I, Patricia M. Newman,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of Westaff, Inc.(the “Company”), that, to the best of my knowledge;

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 20,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:   March 6, 2007    |                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                    |                    |   |
| By:                                     | /s/ Patricia M.  Newman |   |   |   |
| Patricia M. Newman                      |                    |   |
| *President and Chief Executive Officer* |                    |   |
|                                         |                         |        |  |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by § 906 has been provided to Westaff, Inc. and willbe retained by Westaff, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
**Exhibit 99.20**

**CONSENT OF KEVIN MURRAY, P.ENG.**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibits thereto, ofGoldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the “Annual Report”), I, Kevin Murray, P.Eng., consent to (i) the use of and reference to the technical report dated 31 December, 2015,entitled “Cerro Negro Operations, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, NI 43-101 Technical Report” (the “Technical Report”), or portions thereof, that was prepared by me, that I supervised the preparation of and/or was reviewed andapproved by me, (ii) the use of and references to my name, including as an expert or “qualified person”, in connection with the Annual Report and the Technical Report, and (iii) the information derived or summarized from the TechnicalReport that is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto. 

I also hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibits thereto into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126039,333-126040,333-151243,333-151251,333-174376,333-181116,333-188805,333-195816 and 333-213153 on Form S-8,No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company. 

Date: March 16, 2017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 52 
          - [R03-OAR-2005-DE-0001; FRL-7970-4] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of direct final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

Due to adverse comments, EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule to approve Delaware's State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. The SIP revision pertains to the modifications to the ambient air quality standards for ozone and fine particulate matter. In the direct final rule published on July 18, 2005 (70 FR 41146), we stated that if we received adverse comments by August 17, 2005, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA subsequently received adverse comments. EPA will address the comments received in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published on July 18, 2005 (70 FR 41166). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. 

# DATES:

The direct final rule is withdrawn as of September 16, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by e-mail at                         *quinto.rose@epa.gov*.                     

# List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

        - Environmental protection
        - Air pollution control
        - Nitrogen dioxide
        - Ozone
        - Particulate matter
        - Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
        - Volatile organic compounds

      ( print page 54640)    
Dated: September 6, 2005. 

Donald S. Welsh, 

Regional Administrator, Region III. 

Accordingly, the added entry for Delaware's Regulation 1, Section 2, and revised entries for Regulation 3, Sections 1, 6, and 11 in 40 CFR 52.420(c) published at 70 FR 41147 are withdrawn as of September 16, 2005. 

[FR Doc. 05-18565 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# CE2004078EN.01040701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/407 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/407

---

(2004/C 78 E/0428)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2460/03

by Patricia McKenna (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(16 July 2003)

Subject:   Anti-competitive actions of the Irish State in the electricity market

Subject:

The Irish State has announced the results of the latest AER support scheme for renewable energy. The main beneficiaries are subsidiaries of the national electricity utility ESB and their partner companies.

Given that the ESB is absolutely dominant in the Irish electricity market, with enormous resources at its disposal, does the Commission consider that permitting ESB subsidiaries to participate in the AER competition constitutes a distortion of the market? Does it further amount to a discrimination, given the fact that it can use the extensive resources it has accumulated under State ownership, with its State backing, to undercut independent producers?

Is the Commission willing to instruct the Irish State to halt the awards to ESB subsidiaries and partners while it investigates the foregoing questions in relation to this competition?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(3 September 2003)

(3 September 2003)

The Commission state aid decision regarding the rural electrification scheme (AER) (1) does not impose any requirement as to the nature of bidders. It is designed to increase the volume of electricity produced from renewable sources of energy in Ireland and there is nothing to prevent subsidiaries of the Electricity Supply Board (ESB) from participating in this increase provided that they satisfy the necessary conditions for bidding successfully.

1

The Commission takes the view that, as the majority shareholder in ESB, the Irish State is free to manage the company's capital as it sees fit, provided that it complies with the market-economy investor principle. In the case at issue, the Commission does not possess any information suggesting that ESB subsidiaries receive aid from their parent company in the form of, say, supplies at lower-than-market prices.

The Commission has no intention, therefore, of amending its above decision so as to exclude ESB subsidiaries from the AER scheme or of intervening in the awarding of contracts to ESB or its partners.

---

(1)  Commission decision in Case N 553/01, OJ C 45, 19.2.2002.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher John HORTON.

No. 367P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Sherri G. Horner, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Christopher Horton, for Horton, Christopher John.

Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th of November 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
# C_2008116EN.01002902.xml

| 9.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/29

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 March 2008 — ASTER v Commission

(Case T-409/05) (1)

1

(2008/C 116/54)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 28.1.2006.

1

---
In the Matter of R.P.D.

No. 370P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Ryan McKaig, for Davis, Racine.

Kathleen Arundell Jackson, for Mecklenburg County.

Matthew D. Wunsche, Appellate Counsel, for GAL.

Matthew Wunsche, Durham.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th of November 2015 by Respondent (Mother) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
State of North Carolina v. Maurice Parker

No. 136P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, William R. West, District Attorney, For State.

Maurice Parker, Pro Per.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th of April 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN Television
Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Gary R. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, William A.
Cunningham, Vice President and Controller, Deborah R. Jacobson, Vice President
of Corporate Development and Treasurer, and Peter E. Maloney, Vice President of
Finance, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     Dated: November 17, 2003        /s/ Gary R. Chapman
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Gary R. Chapman
                                     Chief Executive Officer

     Dated: November 17, 2003        /s/ William A. Cunningham
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     William A. Cunningham
                                     Vice President and Controller

     Dated: November 17, 2003        /s/ Deborah R. Jacobson
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Deborah R. Jacobson
                                     Vice President of Corporate Development and
                                     Treasurer

     Dated: November 17, 2003        /s/ Peter E. Maloney
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Peter E. Maloney
                                     Vice President of Finance
#### Felicita Cruz, Respondent, v Green Bus Lines, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Brooklyn Union Gas, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 341]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Brooklyn Union Gas appeals from an order of the *926Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), dated January 30, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The defendant Brooklyn Union Gas (hereinafter Brooklyn Union) sustained its burden of demonstrating its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidentiary proof that it was not performing work in the vicinity of the subject intersection on the date of the accident and that it did not own the construction equipment that allegedly contributed to the accident by obstructing a driver’s view of oncoming traffic (see *Robertson v City of New York,*21 AD3d 939 [2005] [decided herewith]). The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs and a codefendant in opposition to the motion was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether Brooklyn Union owned the construction equipment claimed to have obstructed the driver’s view, or whether any other negligence on Brooklyn Union’s part contributed to the accident *(see Robertson v City of New York, supra).*Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the C-bass Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-RP2, Plaintiff, v. Willie Lee PINKNEY, Clara Pinkney, Siddco, Inc., Poore Substitute Trustee, Ltd, Defendants.

No. COA15-797.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 10, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Robert Allen SARTORI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION, et al., Defendants.

No. COA 15-319.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 3, 2015.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Error.
# C_2009055EN.01002202.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/22

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 January 2009 — giropay v OHIM (GIROPAY)

(Case T-399/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark GIROPAY - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 55/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: giropay GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: K. Gründig-Schnelle, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 October 2006 (Case R 308/2005-4) concerning an application for registration of the word mark GIROPAY as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders giropay GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders giropay GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.

1

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 16 , 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00326

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.C., A CHILD

,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- PA

- 01427 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On August 8, 2016 , this court received a ppellant ’s brief. Appellant ’s brief violates Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.8 in that the document contained in the appendix has not been
redacted to protect the minor’s identity.

We, therefore, ORDER that a ppellant ’s brief is STRICKEN . We further ORDER appellant’s attorney to file an amended appellant’s brief in compliance with TRAP 9.8 on or before August 26, 2016

. NO EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED given the procedural history of this appeal. If appellant’s amended brief is not filed by August 26, 2016 , we will abate this appeal to the trial court to determine whether new appellate counsel shoul d be appointed

. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. ' 107.013(a)(1) (giving indigent persons a right to counsel in parental

- rights termination cases); In re M.S. , 115 S.W.3d 534, 544 (Tex. 2003) (holding that this right to counsel includes the right to effective cou nsel).

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 16th day of August, 201 6

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Part 100 
          - [CGD05-05-110] 
          - RIN 1625-AA08 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice of enforcement of regulation. 

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard is implementing the special local regulations at 33 CFR 100.513 during the Wilmington YMCA Triathlon to be held September 24, 2005, on the waters of Wrightsville Channel, Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the event. The effect will be to restrict general navigation in the regulated area for the safety of participants and vessels transiting the event area. 

*Enforcement Dates:*33 CFR 100.513 will be enforced from 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. on September 24, 2005.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        D.M. Sens, Project Manager, Fifth Coast                               ( print page 54479)                            Guard District, Operations Division, Auxiliary and Boating Safety Branch, at (757) 398-6204.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Wilmington YMCA will sponsor the Wilmington YMCA Triathlon on September 24, 2005 on the waters of Wrightsville Channel, Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina. The event will involve approximately 1100 swimmers competing along a course within the regulated area. In order to ensure the safety of the swimmers and transiting vessels, 33 CFR 100.513 will be enforced for the duration of the event. Under provisions of 33 CFR 100.513, a vessel may not enter the regulated area unless it receives permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. 

In addition to this notice, the maritime community will be provided extensive advance notification via the Local Notice to Mariners, marine information broadcasts, local radio stations and area newspapers, so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly. 

Dated: August 31, 2005. 

L.L. Hereth, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 05-18341 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P