alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001045560
<NAME> PRT GROUP INC

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,052,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,810,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,242,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   530,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,777,000
<PP&E>                                      16,019,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,242,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,535,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,743,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  86,361,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,535,000
<SALES>                                     65,359,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,359,000
<CGS>                                       47,815,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,815,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            38,924,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               411,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             203,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (21,215,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (21,215,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (21,215,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.16)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6975

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SCOTT MATTINGLY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CR-97-241-A, CA-00-80-AM)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Mattingly, Appellant Pro Se. Gavin Alexander Corn, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We recently held in United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139

(4th Cir. 2001), that the new rule announced in Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to

cases on collateral review. Accordingly, Appellant’s Apprendi

claim is not cognizable.

2

PER CURIAM:

Scott Mattingly seeks to appeal the district court’s order

granting in part and denying in part his motion filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Mattingly’s

“Notice Motion,” and dismiss the appeal substantially on the

reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Mattingly, Nos.

CR-97-241-A; CA-00-80-AM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 12, 2001; entered

Apr. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51493

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIANO VELASCO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-2070-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Mariano Velasco appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction

for importation of more than 50 kilograms of marijuana and for possession with

intent to distribute more than 50 kilograms of marijuana. He argues that the

district court clearly erred in denying him a minor-role adjustment under

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). Velasco contends that he was a mere courier who was

substantially less culpable than other participants in the offense.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51493

2

Following United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), sentences are

reviewed for reasonableness in light of the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a). See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519-20 (5th Cir. 2005).

Pursuant to Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 596-97 (2007), this court must

determine whether the sentence imposed is procedurally sound, including

whether the calculation of the advisory guidelines range is correct, and whether

the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable. Review is for an abuse of

discretion. Id. at 597. “Neither Gall, Rita v. United States, [127 S. Ct. 2456

(2007)], nor Kimbrough v. United States, [128 S. Ct. 558 (2007)] purport to alter

[this court’s] review of the district court’s construction of the Guidelines or

findings of fact.” United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir.

2008). We review the district court’s determination of a defendant’s role in the

offense for clear error. United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203 n.9 (5th

Cir. 2005). 

To be eligible for a minor-role adjustment, a defendant “must have been

peripheral to the advancement of the illicit activity.” United States v. Miranda,

248 F.3d 434, 447 (5th Cir. 2001). In light of Velasco’s actual involvement in

importing and possessing 71.75 kilograms of marijuana, the district court did not

clearly err in denying an adjustment for a minor role in the offense. See United

States v. Atanda, 60 F.3d 196, 199 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Gallegos, 868

F.2d 711, 712-13 (5th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1602-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1602-DR), dated August 28, 2005, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 6, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective September 6, 2005. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05-18552 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
**Exhibit 99.7****CONSENT OF S. BLAIS**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following report and documents,which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statementon Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission: 1. The technical report dated November 17, 2006, entitled “The Red Lake GoldMines Property, Red Lake Mining Division, Northern Ontario,” (the “Red Lake Report”);and  2. The annual information form of the Company dated March 25, 2008, whichincludes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the Red LakeReport, and the properties described therein.Date: March 28, 2008         /s/ Stephane Blais   Name:  Stephane Blais, P. Eng.   Title:  Chief Engineer, Red Lake Gold Mine
STATE v. Somchoi NOORSOB.

No. 131P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 2016.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Somchoi Noonsab, Spruce Pine, for Noorsob, Somchoi.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of April 2016 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 174 (Friday, September 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17940]



[[Page 53676]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Cancellation of Meetings

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Commission on 
Systemic Interoperability, September 13, 2005, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Hubert 
H. Humphrey Building, Room 800, 200 Independence Avenue, Washington, DC 
20201, cancellation of the Commission on Systemic Interoperability 
Teleconference, October 11, 2005, 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., National Library 
of Medicine, Conference Room B, Building 38, 2nd Floor, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20894, and the cancellation of the Commission on Systemic 
Interoperability, October 24, 2005, 8 a.m. to 1 p.m., Hubert H. 
Humphrey Building, Room 800, 200 Independence Avenue, Washington, DC 
20201, all of which were published in the Federal Register on July 13, 
2005, 70 FR 40392.
    These meetings are cancelled, as they are no longer necessary to 
complete Commission activities.

    Dated: August 31, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-17940 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00461-CR

Jennifer Elaine Caraveo, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-07-301380, HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Jennifer Elaine Caraveo pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated

robbery. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03 (West 2003). Caraveo seeks to appeal from the

judgment of conviction. The district court has certified that the defendant has waived the right of

appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

_____________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed

Filed: August 20, 2008

Do Not Publish
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**  I, James R. Kupferschmid, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kitty Hawk, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     August 20, 2007 By: /s/ JAMES R. KUPFERSCHMID         James R. Kupferschmid    Principal Executive Officer
# CE2004070EN.01015901.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/159 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/159

---

(2004/C 70 E/166)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2899/03

by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(1 October 2003)

Subject:   Public debt and budget deficit in Greece in 2003

Subject:

What is the Commission's estimate of the budget deficit and public debt in Greece as a percentage of GDP in 2003?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(4 November 2003)

(4 November 2003)

In the 2003 State Budget and the 2002 Stability programme, the central government debt is projected to be equal to EUR 171,05 billion, whereas the general government consolidated gross debt is estimated to be EUR 150,4 billion, representing 100,2 % of gross domestic product (GDP). According to the Commission Spring forecasts, the Greek general government deficit is projected to be equal to 1,1 % of GDP whereas the general government debt ratio is projected to stand at 101 % of GDP at the end of 2003.

Currently, the Commission is proceeding to the Autumn forecast round and these estimates may be revised.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Strasbaugh (the “Company”) for
the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify
in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their
knowledge:




1.           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  April
      15, 2009
            By:
            /s/ CHUCK SCHILLINGSChuck
      SchillingsChief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)Date:  April
      15, 2009
            By:
            /s/ RICHARD NANCERichard
      NanceChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# C_2010234EN.01005601.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/56

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — Kurrer v Commission

(Case F-139/06) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Officials - Appointment - Temporary agents appointed as officials - Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment - Classification in grade pursuant to the new, less favourable rules - Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

2010/C 234/101

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Christian Kurrer (Watermael-Boitsfort, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M. Simm, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission decision, effective from 1 April 2006, by which the applicant — a member of the temporary staff in grade A7 (now grade A*8) and a successful candidate in Open Competition COM/A/3/03 — was appointed as an official in grade A*6, step 2, pursuant to the provisions of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations, without maintenance of the points which he had accumulated as a member of the temporary staff

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 20 of 27.01.07, p. 39.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. John Edward BUTLER.

No. 629P01-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

John Edward Butler, for Butler, John Edward.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 21st of September 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
# CE2004084EN.01022301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/223 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/223

---

(2004/C 84 E/0267)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3139/03

by Peter Liese (PPE-DE) to the Council

(23 October 2003)

Subject:   EU preparedness in the event of biological attack

Subject:

The Commission adopted a Communication on Cooperation in the European Union on Preparedness and Response to Biological and Chemical Agent Attacks on 2 June 2003 (1).

1

In its Communication, the Commission recommends stockpiling at EU level, but Member States have shown preference for the development of national stockpiles only. The Communication states ‘the sizes of the national stockpiles in relation to the national population range from enough to provide a dose for every citizen in the Member State to enough for one citizen in thirty’ (page 15).

Can the Council explain the reasons for not taking into account the Commission recommendation for a coordinated Community-level stockpile of smallpox vaccines?

Based on the Council approach, how does the Council intend to guarantee an equal supply and distribution of vaccines for all EU citizens, including those in the accession countries, in the event of a bioterrorism attack?

Reply

(9 March 2004)

(9 March 2004)

Article 152(5) of the Treaty states that Community action in the field of public health shall fully respect the responsibilities of the Member States for the organisation and delivery of health services and medical care.

As mentioned in the Commission's Communication which the Council received on 5 June 2003, the Member States have through the Pharmaceutical Committee network and through the Health Security Committee considered the need for the establishment of a Community stockpile of, inter alia, smallpox vaccines with the Commission services-pharmaceutical industry task force. As mentioned in the same Commission Communication, consultations on options for a Community stockpile or virtual reserve or a strategic sharing of national stockpiles showed that most Member States would not support either the establishment of a Community level stockpile of smallpox vaccines or formal arrangements for sharing national stockpiles. Indeed for different reasons different Member States have until now considered that a Community level stockpile would not provide added value over the existing and planned national stockpiles.

Given that this consultation process concerns an area of strictly Member State competence and given that it took place under the auspices of the Commission and not the Council, the Honourable Member may wish to take this matter up with the Commission and/or the individual Member States.

---

(1)  COM(2003)320.

1

---