Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 54651 

hydroxypyrimidine metabolite, 6-(2- 

chlorophenoxy)-5-fluoro-4-pyrimidinol, 

in or on the following raw agricultural 

commodities: 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

Cattle, fat .................................. 0.10 

Cattle, meat .............................. 0.05 

Cattle, meat byproducts ........... 0.10 

Goat, fat .................................... 0.10 

Goat, meat ................................ 0.05 

Goat, meat byproducts ............. 0.10 

Horse, fat .................................. 0.10 

Horse, meat .............................. 0.05 

Horse, meat byproducts ........... 0.10 

Milk ........................................... 0.02 

Milk, fat ..................................... 0.50 

Sheep, fat ................................. 0.10 

Sheep, meat ............................. 0.05 

Sheep, meat byproducts .......... 0.10 

(b) Section 18 emergency exemptions. 

[Reserved] 

(c) Tolerances with regional 

registrations. [Reserved] 

(d) Indirect or inadvertent residues. 

Tolerances are established for the 

indirect or inadvertent combined 

residues of fluoxastrobin, (1E)-[2-[[6-(2- 

chlorophenoxy)-5-fluoro-4- 

pyrimydinyl]oxy]phenyl](5,6-dihydro1,4,2-dioxazin-3-yl)methanone Omethyloxime, and its Z isomer, (1Z)-[2- 

[[6-(2-chlorophenoxy)-5-fluoro-4- 

pyrimydinyl]oxy]phenyl](5,6-dihydro1,4,2-dioxazin-3-yl)methanone Omethyloxime, in or on the following raw 

agricultural commodities when present 

therein as a result of the application of 

fluoxastrobin to the growing crops listed 

in paragraph (a)(1) of this section: 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

Alfalfa, forage ........................... 0.050 

Alfalfa, hay ................................ 0.10 

Cotton, gin byproducts ............. 0.020 

Grain, cereal, forage, fodder, 

and straw, group 16 .............. 0.10 

Grass, forage ............................ 0.10 

Grass, hay ................................ 0.50 

Vegetable, foliage of legume, 

group 7 .................................. 0.050 

[FR Doc. 05–18421 Filed 9–15–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–S 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

48 CFR Part 205 

[DFARS Case 2004–D025] 

Defense Federal Acquisition 

Regulation Supplement; Provision of 

Information to Cooperative Agreement 

Holders 

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: DoD has adopted as final, 

without change, an interim rule 

amending the Defense Federal 

Acquisition Regulation Supplement 

(DFARS) to implement Section 816 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2005. Section 816 

increased, from $500,000 to $1,000,000, 

the threshold at which a DoD contract 

must include a requirement for the 

contractor to provide to cooperative 

agreement holders, upon their request, a 

list of the contractor’s employees who 

are responsible for entering into 

subcontracts. 

DATES: Effective September 16, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Robin Schulze, Defense Acquisition 

Regulations Council, 

OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 

3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 

20301–3062. Telephone (703) 602–0326; 

facsimile (703) 602–0350. Please cite 

DFARS Case 2004–D025. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Background 

DoD published an interim rule at 70 

FR 8536 on February 22, 2005, to 

implement Section 816 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2005 (Pub. L. 108–375). Section 

816 amended 10 U.S.C. 2416(d) to 

increase, from $500,000 to $1,000,000, 

the threshold at which a DoD contract 

must include a requirement for the 

contractor to provide to cooperative 

agreement holders, upon their request, a 

list of the contractor’s employees who 

are responsible for entering into 

subcontracts. The interim rule amended 

the prescription for use of the clause at 

DFARS 252.205–7000, Provision of 

Information to Cooperative Agreement 

Holders, to reflect the new dollar 

threshold. 

DoD received no comments on the 

interim rule. Therefore, DoD has 

adopted the interim rule as a final rule 

without change. 

This rule was not subject to Office of 

Management and Budget review under 

Executive Order 12866, dated 

September 30, 1993. 

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

DoD certifies that this final rule will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

within the meaning of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. 

While the rule reduces administrative 

burdens for contractors, the economic 

impact is not expected to be substantial. 

C. Paperwork Reduction Act 

The information collection 

requirements of the clause at DFARS 

252.205–7000, Provision of Information 

to Cooperative Agreement Holders, have 

been approved by the Office of 

Management and Budget, under Control 

Number 0704–0286, for use through 

September 30, 2007. 

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 205 

Government procurement. 

Michele P. Peterson, 

Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations 

System. 

Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without 

Change 

■ Accordingly, the interim rule 

amending 48 CFR Part 205, which was 

published at 70 FR 8536 on February 22, 

2005, is adopted as a final rule without 

change. 

[FR Doc. 05–18476 Filed 9–15–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

48 CFR Part 217 

[DFARS Case 2004–D024] 

Defense Federal Acquisition 

Regulation Supplement; Multiyear 

Contracting 

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: DoD has adopted as final, 

without change, an interim rule 

amending the Defense Federal 

Acquisition Regulation Supplement 

(DFARS) to implement Section 8008 of 

the Defense Appropriations Act for 

Fiscal Year 2005 and Section 814 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2005. Sections 8008 and 814 

contain requirements related to the 

funding of multiyear contracts. 

DATES: Effective September 16, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Robin Schulze, Defense Acquisition 

Regulations Council, 

OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 

3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 

20301–3062. Telephone (703) 602–0326; 

facsimile (703) 602–0350. Please cite 

DFARS Case 2004–D024. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Background 

DoD published an interim rule at 70 

FR 24323 on May 9, 2005, to implement 

Section 8008 of the Defense 

Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2005 

(Pub. L. 108–287) and Section 814 of the 

54652 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 179 / Friday, September 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2005 (Pub. L. 108–375). 

Section 814 requires DoD to provide 

notice and supporting rationale to 

Congress before awarding a multiyear 

contract containing a cancellation 

ceiling exceeding $100 million that is 

not fully funded. Section 8008 places 

additional restrictions on the award of 

multiyear contracts for supplies using 

fiscal year 2005 appropriated funds. 

DoD received no comments on the 

interim rule. Therefore, DoD has 

adopted the interim rule as a final rule 

without change. 

This rule was not subject to Office of 

Management and Budget review under 

Executive Order 12866, dated 

September 30, 1993. 

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

DoD certifies that this final rule will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

within the meaning of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., 

because the rule addresses internal DoD 

planning, budgeting, and reporting 

requirements related to the award of 

multiyear contracts. 

C. Paperwork Reduction Act 

The Paperwork Reduction Act does 

not apply because the rule does not 

impose any information collection 

requirements that require the approval 

of the Office of Management and Budget 

under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. 

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 217 

Government procurement. 

Michele P. Peterson, 

Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations 

System. 

Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without 

Change 

■ Accordingly, the interim rule 

amending 48 CFR Part 217, which was 

published at 70 FR 24323 on May 9, 

2005, is adopted as a final rule without 

change. 

[FR Doc. 05–18475 Filed 9–15–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 600 

[Docket No. 050520139-5239-02; I.D. 

030305A] 

RIN 0648–AS46 

Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; 

Fishing Capacity Reduction Program; 

Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and 

Tanner Crabs; Industry Fee System for 

Fishing Capacity Reduction Loan 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: NMFS establishes regulations 

to implement an industry fee system for 

repaying a $97,399,357.11 Federal loan 

financing a fishing capacity reduction 

program in the Bering Sea/Aleutian 

Islands King and Tanner Crab fishery. 

This action implements the fee system. 

DATES: This final rule is effective, and 

crab program fee payment collection 

will begin, on October 17, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the 

Environmental Assessment, Regulatory 

Impact Review, and Final Regulatory 

Flexibility Analysis (EA/RIR/FRFA) for 

the program may be obtained from 

Michael L. Grable, Chief, Financial 

Services Division, National Marine 

Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West 

Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910–

3282. 

Written comments involving the 

burden-hour estimates or other aspects 

of the collection-of-information 

requirements contained in this final rule 

should be submitted in writing to 

Michael L. Grable, at the above address, 

and to David Rostker, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), by email at DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or 

by fax to 202–395–7285. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael L. Grable, (301) 713–2390. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Sections 312(b)-(e) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1861a(b) 

through (e)) generally authorized fishing 

capacity reduction programs. In 

particular, section 312(d) authorized 

industry fee systems for repaying the 

reduction loans which finance 

reduction program costs. 

Subpart L of 50 CFR part 600 is the 

framework rule generally implementing 

sections 312(b)-(e). 

Sections 1111 and 1112 of the 

Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 App. 

U.S.C. 1279f and 1279g) generally 

authorized reduction loans. 

The Consolidated Appropriations Act 

of 2001 (Public Law 106–554) directed 

the Secretary of Commerce to establish 

a $100 million fishing capacity 

reduction program in the Bering Sea/ 

Aleutian Islands king and Tanner crab 

fishery. Congress amended the 

authorizing Act twice (Public Law 107–

20 and Public Law 107–117), once to 

change the crab reduction program’s 

funding from a $50 million 

appropriation and a $50 million loan to 

a $100 million loan and once to clarify 

provisions about crab fishery vessels. 

NMFS published the crab reduction 

program’s proposed implementation 

rule on December 12, 2002 (67 FR 

76329) and its final rule on December 

12, 2003 (68 FR 69331). Anyone 

interested in the program’s full 

implementation details should refer to 

these two documents. NMFS initially 

proposed and adopted the program’s 

implementation rule as section 600.1018 

of Subpart L of 50 CFR part 600, but 

NMFS has since, without other change, 

re-designated the rule as section 

600.1103 in a new subpart M of part 

600. 

To avoid confusion, the following 

table identifies the various part 600 

rules involved in or affecting the crab 

reduction program: 

DESCRIPTION SUBPART SECTION 

Reduction Framework Rule L 600.1000–600.1017 

Program Implementation Rule’s Initial Designation L 600.1018 

Program Implementation Rule’s Re-designation M 600.1103 

Fee Rule M 600.1104 

The crab reduction program’s 

maximum cost was $100 million 

consisting of a 30-year loan to be repaid 

by fees on future crab landings. Each of 

six of the crab fishery’s seven former 

crab area/species endorsement fisheries 

were to pay fees at different rates. In 

return for reduction payments equaling 

their bid amounts, voluntary program 

participants relinquished, among other 

things, their crab fishing license 

limitation program (LLP) licenses and 

other permits, their catch histories 

associated with those licenses and