alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.9(g) 

**SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

          THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of this 13th day of April, 2007 to that certain EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of December 21, 1999, asheretofore amended (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), by and between R. NEAL BLACK (“Employee”) and JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (“Employer”). 

                     FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement, hereby amend the EmploymentAgreement as follows: 

          1. Subject to earlier termination otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the last day of the Employment Period shall be January 31, 2009. 

          2. Effective March 4, 2007, Employee’s Base Salary shall be $560,000.00.

          Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and theterms of the remainder of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respective meanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. ThisAmendment shall hereafter be deemed a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes. The terms of employment set forth in this Amendment have been approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Employer. 

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 

JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC.
Exhibit 99.12
 CONSENT OF DAVID BRIMAGE
   1.
    
    The technical report dated March 26, 2011, entitled Cerro Negro Gold Project Santa Cruz
Province, Argentina NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Cerro Negro Report); and2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information
relating to the Cerro Negro Report and the Cerro Negro Gold Project, and the properties
described therein.
  Date: March 31, 2011/s/ David BrimageName:
    David Brimage, M.AusIMM
LIPE v. STARR DAVIS COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 445P14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

M. Duane Jones, Charlotte, for Travelers Casualty & Surety.

Hatcher B. Kincheloe, Charlotte.

Michael B. Pross, for Lipe, Shirley, et al.

Cathy A. Williams, for Lipe, Shirley, et al.

Jeri L. Whitfield, for N.C. Chamber and N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

Elizabeth Brooks Scherer, for N.C. Chamber and N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of January 2015 by Defendant (Travelers Casualty & Surety) to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
CERTIFICATIONS Pursuant to Section 302




I, Gary Saunders, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10KSB of eKnowledge Group, Inc] ;




2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:




a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;




b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and




c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;




5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and




b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and




6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date: May 20, 2003




/s/***Gary S. Saunders***  Gary S. Saunders  President / Director / Secretary
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 06-0416

((((((((((((((((

In re Columbia Medial Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P. d/b/a Las Colinas Medical Center, Antonette Conner, and Anna Mathew

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.This cause has been **ABATED** pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2. 

2.This case is removed from the Court’s active docket and shall be treated as closed, subject to reinstatement upon proper motion or further order of the Court.

3.All trial court proceedings in Cause No. 02-05307-K, styled *Wendy Creech, individually, as administrator of the estate of Donald Creech, Jr., deceased, and as next friend of Billie Creech, a minor, and Jerimiah Creech, Donald Creech, and Janet Gifford, individually v. Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Inc. d/b/a Las Colinas Medical Center, Ali Shirvani, M.D., and Rabia Kahn, M.D.*, in the 192nd District Court of Dallas County, Texas, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

4.The Court requests that relators notify the Court when the successor judge has ruled in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b).

Done at the City of Austin, this 29th day of August 2008.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
STATE v. Kawamie Shonta COLE.

No. 378P09-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Jason T. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina

Kawamie Shonta Cole, Lillington, for Cole, Kawamie Shonta.

*569Maureen Krueger, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th of October 2015 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

JACKSON, J. recused.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18802]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Office of the General Counsel; Appointment of Members of the 
Legal Division to the Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue 
Service

    Under the authority granted to me as Chief Counsel of the Internal 
Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of the 
Treasury by General Counsel Order No. 21 (Rev. 4), pursuant to the 
Civil Service Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the 
Legal Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service 
Panel:

1. Chairperson, James Carroll, Deputy General Counsel
2. Deborah N. Nolan, Commissioner, Large and Midsize Business
3. Eric Solomon, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Affairs

    This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
Donald L. Korb,
Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service.
[FR Doc. 05-18802 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Dime Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-88552, 33-88554, 33-88556, 33-88558, 33-88560, 33-88564, 33-88566, 333-04477,
333-26609, 333-26777, 333-35565, 333-48127, 333-51941, 333-64509 and 333-75103)
on Form S-8 of Dime Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 21, 1999 relating
to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Dime Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report is
incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Dime Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 30, 1999
# CE2004070EN.01004301.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/43

---

(2004/C 70 E/047)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1479/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(2 May 2003)

Subject:   Exports of fresh and frozen beef from Member States to the Vatican City State and management of the meat counters in the Vatican shop

Subject:

In an interview published in March 2001 in the trade journal ‘Eurocarni’, Ruggero Guidoni, the head of Guidoncarni, which is based in Torrevecchia (Rome), stated that in 2000 ‘Unicarni of Reggio Emilia ... was awarded the contract to supply meat to the supermarket run by the Vatican Governorate, where around ten thousand consumers from that community, including purchasers for several religious houses, can buy goods on production of the appropriate pass. Ildo Cigarini, the chairman of Unicarni, asked us to manage the meat counters in the Vatican shop ... and we took up a 30 % stake in the company Roma Carni 2000, which was set up for that purpose. CIR Surgelati also took up a stake. The estimated turnover was 15-20 billion per annum. It could be even higher. Unfortunately the crisis upset these forecasts.’

In the period 1998/2000 the Vatican imported 22 529,27 quintals of meat from EU Member States and received the export refunds provided for. These exports came from Belgium (579,84 q), Ireland (2 226,01 q), Italy (8 044,47 q) and the Netherlands (11 678,94 q).

In the light of the above, could the Commission indicate:

| — | what instruments the European Union has, or in other words what measures Italy has adopted, to ensure that the Vatican does not — directly or indirectly — remarket in the European Union products for which export refunds are granted; |
| --- | --- |

—

what instruments the European Union has, or in other words what measures Italy has adopted, to ensure that the Vatican does not — directly or indirectly — remarket in the European Union products for which export refunds are granted;

| — | whether the company that was awarded this meat management contract, or rather its constituent companies, export meat to the Vatican directly or through an intermediary; |
| --- | --- |

—

whether the company that was awarded this meat management contract, or rather its constituent companies, export meat to the Vatican directly or through an intermediary;

| — | the names of the Belgian, Irish, Italian and Dutch companies that exported meat to the Vatican in the period 1998/2001? |
| --- | --- |

—

the names of the Belgian, Irish, Italian and Dutch companies that exported meat to the Vatican in the period 1998/2001?

---
# C_2012355EN.01001401.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Shell Petroleum and Others v Commission

(Case T-343/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Joint control - Fines - Aggravating circumstances - Role of instigator and leader - Repeated infringement - Duration of the infringement - Rights of the defence - Unlimited jurisdiction - Conduct of the undertaking during the administrative procedure)

2012/C 355/23

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Shell Petroleum NV (The Hague, Netherlands), The Shell Transport and Trading Company Ltd (London, United Kingdom) and Shell Nederland Verkoopmaatschappij BV (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented: initially by O. Brouwer, W. Knibbeler and S. Verschuur, and subsequently by O. Brouwer, W. Knibbeler and P. van den Berg, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, Agent, and by L. Gyselen, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)) in so far as it concerns the applicants, and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 2(l) of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)) in so far as it sets the fine imposed on Shell Petroleum NV, The Shell Transport and Trading Company Ltd and Shell Nederland Verkoopmaatschappij BV at EUR 108 million; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 2(l) of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)) in so far as it sets the fine imposed on Shell Petroleum NV, The Shell Transport and Trading Company Ltd and Shell Nederland Verkoopmaatschappij BV at EUR 108 million;

| 2. | Reduces the fine imposed on Shell Petroleum, The Shell Transport and Trading Company and Shell Nederland Verkoopmaatschappij by Article 2(l) of that decision to EUR 81 million; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Reduces the fine imposed on Shell Petroleum, The Shell Transport and Trading Company and Shell Nederland Verkoopmaatschappij by Article 2(l) of that decision to EUR 81 million;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.

1

---
QUALITY BUILT HOMES INCORPORATED, et al. v. TOWN OF CARTHAGE.

No. 315PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

James E. Scarbrough, Concord, for Quality Built Homes Incorporated, et al.

James R. Demay, Concord, for Quality Built Homes Incorporated, et al.

Susan K. Burkhart, Raleigh, for Town of Carthage.

Jennifer Welch.

James M. Carpenter, General Counsel, for N.C. Home Builders Association, Inc.

John T. Benjamin, Jr., Raleigh, for Leading Builders of America.

William E. Hubbard, Raleigh, for Leading Builders of America.

Edward F. Hennessey, IV, Charlotte, for N.C. Home Builders Association, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 14th of December 2015 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 25th day of January 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3647 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3647

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of 
     guide dogs to veterans blinded by a service-connected injury.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 4, 2013

  Mr. Amodei introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of 
     guide dogs to veterans blinded by a service-connected injury.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROVISION OF GUIDE DOGS TO CERTAIN BLIND VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 1714 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b)(1) The Secretary shall provide guide dogs trained for the aid 
of the blind to a veteran who--
            ``(A) is blind by reason of a service-connected injury;
            ``(B) is enrolled under section 1705 of this title; and
            ``(C) elects to receive such a dog.
    ``(2) The Secretary may provide guide dogs trained for the aid of 
the blind to a veteran who is--
            ``(A) enrolled under section 1705 of this title; and
            ``(B) not otherwise described under paragraph (1)(A).
    ``(3) The Secretary may also provide a veteran described in 
paragraph (1) or (2) with mechanical or electronic equipment for aiding 
them in overcoming the disability of blindness.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1714(d) of such title is amended 
by striking ``subsection (b) or (c)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1) or 
(2) of subsection (b) or subsection (c)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

 

No. 07-1682

EFRAÍN MORÁN VEGA,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

VIRGINIA POLO CUEVAS; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP MORÁN-POLO,

Plaintiffs,

v.

VICTOR R. CRUZ BURGOS; JANE DOE 03CV1902-1; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP

CRUZ-DOE; MYRNA CRESPO-SAAVEDRA; JOHN DOE 03CV1902, CONJUGAL

PARTNERSHIP DOE-CRESPO; JOSÉ CORDERO-SERRANO, Director of the

General Services of the Department of Human Resources; JANE DOE

03CV1902-3; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP CORDERO-DOE; FAUSTINO ACEVEDOCRUZ, Sub-Administrator of the Department of Labor for the

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; JANE DOE 03CV1902-4; JOSÉ L. RIVERA;

JANE DOE 03CV1902-5; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP RIVERA-DOE; WILFREDO

RÍOS-SALDAÑA, Regional Director of the Department of Labor for

the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; JANE DOE 03CV1902-6; CONJUGAL

PARTNERSHIP RÍOS-DOE; JESÚS ROHENA; MARÍA DEL CARMEN FUENTES;

ROMÁN M. VELASCO-GONZÁLEZ,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on August 6, 2008, is

corrected as follows:

On page 3, line 14, add a period after "Fed".
In the Matter of C.M.

No. COA15-1223.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Reversed and Remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW157570] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW157570 from Rocky Mountain Land & Leasing, Inc. for lands in Hot Springs County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW157570 effective April 1, 2004, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

Pamela J. Lewis, 

Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 05-18453 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P