alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.3.8.4**

 

**SECONDAMENDMENT**

**TO**

**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

**BY AND AMONG**

**WESTAFF SUPPORT, INC., WESTAFF, INC.,AND DWIGHT S. PEDERSEN**

 

The Employment Agreementeffective as of January 14, 2002 by and among Westaff Support, Inc. (the“Company”), Westaff, Inc. (“Westaff”), and Dwight S. Pedersen (the “Executive”)and amended effective June 30, 2003 is hereby further amended as followseffective June 30, 2004:

 

The second sentence ofSection 3.(a) is hereby deleted and replaced with the following sentence:

 

“Thecurrent annual Base Salary to be paid Executive shall be Four Hundred ThousandDollars ($400,000), less withholdings required by law and agreed upondeductions, if any.”

 

All other terms andconditions of the above-referenced Employment Agreement shall remain in fullforce and effect unless otherwise amended herein.

 

**EXECUTIVE:**

 
| /s/ Dwight S. Pedersen |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Dwight S. Pedersen     |

 

 
| **COMPANY:**                  |                 |
|-------------------------------|----------------------|
| WESTAFF SUPPORT, INC.         |                 |
|                          |                 |
| By:                           | /s/ W. Robert Stover |   |   |
|                          | W. Robert Stover     |   |
|                          |                 |
| Title: Chairman of the  Board |                 |
|                          |                 |
|                          |                 |
| **WESTAFF:**                  |                 |
| WESTAFF, INC.                 |                 |
|                          |                 |
| By:                           | /s/ W. Robert Stover |   |   |
|                          | W. Robert Stover     |   |
|                          |                 |
| Title: Chairman of the  Board |                 |
|                               |                      |  |  |  |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      3(****i).1**




**CERTIFICATE
      OF AMENDMENT TO**




**CERTIFICATE
      OF INCORPORATION**




**OF**




**XECHEM
      INTERNATIONAL, INC.**




Xechem
      International, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue
      of
      the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), DOES
      HEREBY CERTIFY AS FOLLOWS:




The
      First
      Paragraph of Article FOURTH (Authorized Shares) of the Certificate of
      Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended to increase the authorized
      shares of common stock so that as amended the number of authorized common stock
      is increased to 5,000,000,000 shares and shall read as follows:




“The
      aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority to issue
      is 5,050,000,000, of which 2,500 shares of the par value of $.00001 per share
      shall be designated "Class A Voting Preferred Stock," 1,150 shares of the par
      value of $.00001 per share shall be designated "Class B 8% Preferred Stock,"
      49,996,350 shares of the par value of $.00001 per share shall be designated
      "Class C Preferred Stock," and 5,000,000,000 shares of the par value of $.00001
      per share shall be designated "Common Stock.”




In
      accordance with Sections 242 and 228 of the Delaware General Corporation Law,
      the above certificate of amendment has been duly approved by the board of
      directors and stockholders of the Corporation.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, Xechem International, Inc. has caused this Certificate to
      be
      signed by Ramesh C. Pandey, its President and Chief Executive Officer, who
      does
      make this Certificate and declare and certify under penalty of perjury that
      this
      is the act and deed of the Corporation and that the facts stated therein are
      true, and accordingly has caused this Certificate to be executed this 24 day
      of
      October, 2006.


By:
            /s/
              Ramesh C. PandeyName:Ramesh
                C. Pandey
              Its:
                President and Chief Executive
                Officer
# C_2009220EN.01000501.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 July 2009 — SELEX Sistemi Integrati SpA v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-481/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Non-contractual liability of the Community - Commission Decision rejecting a complaint brought against Eurocontrol - Actual and certain damage)

2009/C 220/07

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: SELEX Sistemi Integrati SpA (represented by: F. Sciaudone, R. Sciandone and A. Neri, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Di Bucci and F. Amato, agents.)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 29 August 2007 in Case T-186/05 SELEX Sistemi Integrati v Commission dismissing as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly without foundation in law the action for compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the Commission decision of 12 February 2004 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of an alleged infringement by Eurocontrol of the provisions of the EC Treaty on competition

SELEX Sistemi Integrati

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | orders SELEX Sistemi Integrati SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders SELEX Sistemi Integrati SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 09.02.2008.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,334
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,563
<PP&E>                                         299,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,459
<BONDS>                                        153,344
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,265
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,203
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012355EN.01001801.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Heijmans Infrastructuur v Commission

(Case T-359/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Burden of proof - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence)

2012/C 355/34

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Heijmans Infrastructuur BV (Rosmalen, Netherlands) (represented initially by M. Smeets and A. Van den Oord, and subsequently by M. Smeets, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by A. Bouquet and A. Nijenhuis, Agents, and by F. Wijckmans, F. Tuytschaever and L. Gyselen, lawyers, and subsequently by A. Bouquet, A. Nijenhuis and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, and by F. Wijckmans and F. Tuytschaever)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)), in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Heijmans Infrastructuur BV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Heijmans Infrastructuur BV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Applix, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2001 and as amended on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, David C. Mahoney, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ David C. Mahoney
                                        ---------------------------------

Dated: May 19, 2003                     David C. Mahoney

                                        Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Applix, Inc. and will be retained by Applix, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina, v. Ahking Kaliek WILLIAMS, Defendant.

No. COA15-551.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Jan. 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error in Part; Judgment Arrested in part, and Remanded for Resentencing.
STATE of North Carolina v. Rodney Maurice LUTZ, Defendant.

No. COA15-1081.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
STATE v. WATSON.

No. COA07-1490.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Beaufort (03CRS52636).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
State of North Carolina, v. Allen Wayne Wall, Defendant.

No. COA15-1235

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed: October 18, 2016

NO ERROR.
O'Neal v. Inline Fluid Power, Inc. & Automotive Parts Co., Inc., et al.

261PA15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 22, 2016

Leonard T. Jernigan, Jr., Kristina Brown Thompson, M. Hayes Jernigan, *388Anthony L. Lucas, Attorneys at Law, For O'Neal, Richard.

Viral V. Mehta, Jordan A. Benton, Carl M. Short, III, Attorneys at Law, For Inline Fluid Power, Inc. & Automotive Parts Co., Inc., et al.

M. Duane Jones, Attorney at Law, For N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of June 2016 by NC Association of Defense Attorneys for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of June 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
# C_2008209EN.01004602.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/46

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2008 — Audi v OHIM (Vorsprung durch Technik)

(Case T-70/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark Vorsprung durch Technik - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Partial refusal to register the mark by the examiner - Right to a fair hearing)

(2008/C 209/80)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Audi AG (Ingolstadt, Germany) (represented by: S.O. Gillert and F. Schiwek, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 December 2005 (Case R 237/2005-2) dismissing in part the appeal against the examiner's decision refusing registration of the word mark Vorsprung durch Technik for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 14, 25, 28, 37 to 40 and 42

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Audi AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs). |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Audi AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND AS OF
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000919603
<NAME> QUASAR PROJECTS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,167
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,413)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (163)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (163)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (163)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        

</TABLE>
# CE2004070EN.01016202.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/162 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/162

---

(2004/C 70 E/171)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2914/03

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(29 September 2003)

Subject:   Prodi goes beyond his powers in statements on Arafat

Subject:

Why has Mr Prodi, going beyond his powers, stated in his capacity as President of the Commission that the terrorist Arafat must be the EU's interlocutor?

Are such statements not at odds with the provisions of Article 13 of the TEU, which clearly place responsibility for foreign policy in the Council's hands alone?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(6 November 2003)

(6 November 2003)

As the Honourable Member will no doubt be aware, the President of the Commission was publicly stating the position taken by the Laeken Summit in December 2001, which was reiterated by the Council (Foreign Affairs) on 28 January 2002 in the following words: ‘Israel needs the Palestinian Authority and its elected President, Yasser Arafat, as a partner to negotiate with, both in order to eradicate terrorism and to work towards peace’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 660 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 660

                     For the relief of Majan Jean.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2007

   Mr. Dodd introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     For the relief of Majan Jean.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MAJAN JEAN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Majan Jean 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to 
lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Majan Jean enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Majan Jean 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be 
eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Majan Jean, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Majan Jean under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Majan Jean under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WESTERN
WIRELESS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         132,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,505
<INVENTORY>                                     21,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,336
<PP&E>                                         941,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                 253,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,803,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          119,115
<BONDS>                                      1,315,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       801,227
<OTHER-SE>                                   (546,467)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,803,617
<SALES>                                          9,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,513
<CGS>                                           21,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (64,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (64,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (64,150)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.85)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.85)
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>