alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Peter Papano, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    PETER PAPANO                  
|Peter Papano                         
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|May 5, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0578

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID LLOYD ORR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 16, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 31 2022

01/31/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0578
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 10193 and # 10194]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster 
                        ( print page 54797)
                        for the State of Georgia dated 09/07/2005. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         08/29/2005. *Effective Date:*
                         09/07/2005. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/07/2005. *EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/07/2006.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Carroll, Peach. Contiguous Counties: Alabama, Cleburne,Randolph. Georgia, Bibb, Coweta, Crawford, Douglas, Fulton, Haralson, Heard, Houston, Macon, Paulding, Taylor. The Interest Rates are: PercentHomeowners with credit available elsewhere
5.375Homeowners without credit available elsewhere
2.687Businesses with credit available elsewhere
6.557Businesses & small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere
4.000Other (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere
4.750Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10193 C and for economic injury is 10194 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Georgia, Alabama. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008). Dated: September 7, 2005. Hector V. Barreto, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 05-18438 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 29, 2008

Mr. Geoffrey L. Harrison

Susman Godfrey, L.L.P.

1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100

Houston, TX 77002-5096

Mr. Jon Christian Amberson

Jon Christian Amberson, P.C.

2135 E. Hildebrand Ave.

San Antonio, TX 78209

Mr. Craig T. Enoch

Winstead PC

401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2100

Austin, TX 78701

Mr. John F. Carroll

111 West Olmos Drive

San Antonio, TX 78212

Mr. Rolando Cantu

Rolando Cantu & Associates, P.L.L.C.

9805 N. 10th Street

McAllen, TX 78504

RE:Case Number:  06-0178

Court of Appeals Number:  13-05-00419-CV

Trial Court Number:  C-203-05-D

Style:FOREST OIL CORPORATION AND DANIEL B. WORDEN

v.

JAMES ARGYLE MCALLEN, EL RUCIO LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY, INC., SAN JUANITO LAND PARTNERSHIP, AND MCALLEN TRUST PARTNERSHIP

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  The stay order issued November 2, 2007 is lifted.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0178Page 2**
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**


CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 We
        consent to
        the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements filed on Form
        S-8
        (No. 333-59476 and No. 333-100732) pertaining to the Rockport Healthcare
        Group,
        Inc. stock option plan and long-term incentive plan of our report dated June
        6,
        2005, relating to the financial statements of Rockport Healthcare Group,
        Inc.
        appearing in the Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005.
 
 
 
 
 Hein
        & Associates LLP
 Houston,
        Texas
 June
        29,
        2005
# CE2004070EN.01026101.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/261 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/261

---

(2004/C 70 E/281)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3374/03

by John Bowis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 November 2003)

Subject:   Reclassification of hip, knee and shoulder joint replacements

Subject:

Has the Commission assessed the scientific justification for its possible forthcoming proposal to reclassify hip, knee and shoulder replacement devices as Class III medical devices under Directive 93/42/EEC (1) (total joint replacements are currently classified as Class II b under this Directive), and, in particular, evidence that might link accidents with such replacement devices with their design? Has the Commission considered all available studies and the effects of a reclassification on costs, availability and innovation, and what conclusions has it drawn? In particular, is it aware of the three independent studies commissioned by Eucomed and completed in October?

1

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(18 December 2003)

(18 December 2003)

The Commission, in cooperation with national authorities, has carefully examined the three studies forwarded by Eucomed. These are, as stated by Eucomed, independent studies that reflect the views of their authors, and not Eucomed itself.

In discussions with national authorities, an overwhelming majority emphasised that, in their experience, clinical data for total joint replacement was often lacking and that changes in design were frequently not sufficiently verified with regards to their long term effects. In their view, risks associated with recovery surgery should be minimised as much as possible.

As ever increasingly younger patients receive joint replacements, and in the view of National Authorities, only the strictest conformity assessment procedures should be followed.

Documents presented in the course of discussions do not suggest that stricter conformity assessment procedures have a negative impact for patients with respect to cost, availability or innovation.

---

(1)  OJ L 169, 12.7.1993, p. 1.

1

---
STATE v. VARAS.

No. COA08-725.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 20, 2009.

Certification Date February 9, 2009.

Appeal from Transylvania (06CRS52203).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00125

- CV
In the Interest of J.F. and S.F., Children

On a ppeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County , Texas Trial Cause No. A

- 14

- 0222

- CV

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observ ance. July 14, 2016
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18461]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-920-1310-01; WYW146280]

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW146280 from Gulf 
Exploration LLC for lands in Converse County, Wyoming. The petition was 
filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date 
the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. 
Lewis, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease WYW146280 effective October 1, 2004, under the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the 
lands.

Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 05-18461 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
```
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for
the  period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 11, 2010



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 11, 2010
June 26, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HOKE HENRY EBERHARDT, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00936-CR

NO. 14-13-00937-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
STATE of North Carolina v. Brandon Gene WEEKS, Defendant.

No. COA15-1019.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 19, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Error.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2008 – Hoya v OHIM – Indo (AMPLITUDE)**

**(Case T-9/05)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community word mark AMPLITUDE – Earlier national figurative mark AMPLY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 59, 62-64)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 November 2004 (Case R 433/2004-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Indo Internacional SA and Hoya Kabushiki Kaisha. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Hoya Kabushiki Kaisha |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark AMPLITUDE for goods in Class 9 – Application No 001723931 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Indo Internacional, SA |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | National figurative mark AMPLY |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition dismissed |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Annulment of the contested decision; registration refused |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Hoya Kabushiki Kaisha to pay the costs. |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Celeritek, Inc. of our report dated April 25, 1997 included in the 1997
Annual Report to Shareholders of Celeritek, Inc.

Our audits also include the financial statement schedule of Celeritek, Inc.
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-2886) pertaining to the 1985 Stock Incentive Program, 1994
Stock Option Plan, Outside Directors' Stock Option Plan and Employee Qualified
Stock Purchase Plan of Celeritek, Inc. of our report dated April 25, 1997, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Celeritek, Inc.
incorporated herein by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended March 31, 1997.

                              /s/Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
June 5, 1997
STATE of North Carolina v. Demario Lamont SNEAD.

No. 90PA15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

C. Scott Holmes, Wilmington, for Snead, Demario Lamont.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Staples S. Hughes, Durham, for Snead, Demario Lamont.

Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 26th of March 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# C_2008313EN.01000302.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 October 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Flensburg, Germany) — Proceedings brought by Stefan Grunkin, Dorothee Regina Paul

(Case C-353/06) (1)

1

(Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States - Private international law relating to surnames - Applicable law determined by nationality alone - Minor child born and resident in one Member State with the nationality of another Member State - Non-recognition in the Member State of which he is a national of the surname acquired in the Member State of birth and residence)

(2008/C 313/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Flensburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Stefan Grunkin, Dorothee Regina Paul

Other parties: Leonhard Matthias Grunkin-Paul, Standesamt Niebüll,

Other parties:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Amtsgericht Flensburg (Germany) — Interpretation of Articles 12 and 18 of the EC Treaty — National rule on conflict of laws connecting the law governing the determination of a person's surname to nationality alone — Refusal by the Member State of which he is a national to recognise the surname of a child, made up of the respective surnames of his parents, where the child was born and is resident in another Member State in which he has been registered under that double-barrelled name

Operative part of the judgment

In circumstances such as those of the case in the main proceedings, Article 18 EC precludes the authorities of a Member State, in applying national law, from refusing to recognise a child's surname, as determined and registered in a second Member State in which the child — who, like his parents, has only the nationality of the first Member State — was born and has been resident since birth.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 18.11.2006.

1

---
ORDER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

(First Chamber)

6 December 2007

Case F-40/06

**Luigi Marcuccio**

**v**

**Commission of the European Communities**

(Civil service – Officials – Request for information on personal effects dispatched from the place of employment to the place of residence – No need to adjudicate – Application for damages manifestly unfounded)

**Application:**brought under Articles 236 EC and 152 EA, in which Mr Marcuccio seeks, first, annulment of the implied decision rejecting
his request for a copy of the consignment note relating to the dispatch of his personal effects from Angola to Italy, and,
second, damages.

**Held:**There is no need to adjudicate on the claims for annulment. The claims for compensation are rejected as manifestly unfounded.
The applicant is to bear his own costs and all the costs incurred by the Commission.

**Summary**

1.      *Procedure – Request complied with after action was brought – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate*

*(Staff Regulations, Arts 90 and 91)*

2.      *Officials – Non-contractual liability of the institutions – Conditions – Unlawfulness – Injury – Causal link – Cumulative
conditions*

1.      Since the applicant has, after bringing his action, essentially obtained everything he sought from the institution, his action
for annulment of the implied decision rejecting his request has become devoid of purpose and there is no longer any need to
give a ruling.

(see para. 26)

2.      Non-contractual liability on the part of the Community is subject to a number of conditions relating to the illegality of
the conduct alleged against the Community institutions, actual damage and the existence of a causal link between the conduct
of the institution and the damage complained of. If any one of those conditions is not satisfied, the entire action must be
dismissed and it is unnecessary to consider the other conditions for such liability.

(see para. 44)

See:

T-165/03 *Vonier* v *Commission* [2004] ECR-SC I‐A‐343 and II‐1575, para. 78
Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, the undersigned  officer of Radica
Games Limited (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report
on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Dated:  March 24, 2005                       /s/ Patrick S. Feely
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Patrick S. Feely
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-08-00269-CV

IN RE JOHN BENJAMIN CLOPTON, JR.

AND BARBARA ANN CLOPTON

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot because the Respondent 

issued an August 13, 2008 order requesting the assignment of a special judge to preside 

in the underlying case, which is the relief sought in the mandamus petition.

BILL VANCE

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyna

Petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 3, 2008

[OT06]