alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Denise PANDURE, Plaintiff, v. John R. PANDURE, Defendant.

No. COA15-336.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 1, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# C_2010179EN.01003101.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Chalkor v Commission

(Case T-21/05) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Copper plumbing tube industry - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Continuous and multiform infringement - Fines - Limited participation in the cartel - Geographic extent of the relevant market - Duration of the infringement - Cooperation)

(2010/C 179/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon (Athens, Greece) (represented by: I. Forrester QC, A. Schulz and A. Komninos, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and S. Noë, Agents)

Re:

Application for cancellation or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by Commission Decision C(2004) 2826 of 3 September 2004 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/38.069 — Copper plumbing tubes).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that the fine imposed on Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon under Article 2(d) of Commission Decision C(2004) 2826 of 3 September 2004 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/38.069 — Copper plumbing tubes) shall be set at EUR 8,2467 million. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that the fine imposed on Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon under Article 2(d) of Commission Decision C(2004) 2826 of 3 September 2004 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/38.069 — Copper plumbing tubes) shall be set at EUR 8,2467 million.

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Chalkor Epexergasias Metallon and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Chalkor Epexergasias Metallon and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

---
ASPEN INV. CO., LLC v. RIVER GATE, LLC.

No. COA08-271.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 3, 2009.

Certification Date February 23, 2009.

Appeal from Catawba (07CVS775).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT






Board of Directors
Radica Games Limited


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
33-86960,  333-07000 and 333-59737 on Form S-8, and  Registration  Statement No.
333-07526  and 333-79005 on Form F-3 of Radica Games Limited of our report dated
February 12, 2001,  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Radica Games
Limited for the year ended December 31, 2000.







/S/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

HONG KONG

April 11, 2001
In the Matter of: J.S.K. and J.E.K.

No. COA15-1185.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 10, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23-1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CKE Restaurants, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-83666, 333-76884, 333-41266, 333-83621, 333-83601, 333-76377, 333-51103,
333-52633, 333-62421, 33-56313, 33-55337, 333-12399, 33-53089-01, 2-86142-01,
33-31190-01, 333-12401, 333-75880, 333-27921, 333-14349, 333-05305, 33-52523,
33-52519 and 33-111284) of CKE Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report
dated March 26, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CKE
Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2004 and 2003 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 31, 2004,
which report appears in the January 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of CKE
Restaurants, Inc. and subsidiaries.

Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or
Disposal Activities, during the first and fourth quarters of fiscal 2003,
respectively.

                                                                 /s/ KPMG LLP

Orange County, California
April 5, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55341-55347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18755]



[[Page 55341]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 05-33]


36(b)(1)Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 05-33 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: September 14, 2005.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 55342]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.005


[[Page 55343]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.006


[[Page 55344]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.007


[[Page 55345]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.008


[[Page 55346]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.009


[[Page 55347]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE05.010

[FR Doc. 05-18755 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Kelly v. McCrory, et al.

115P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Mr. Willie T. Kelly, Jr., Pro Se

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of March 2016 by Plaintiff for Tort Claim Civil Complaint:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,903,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  438,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,732,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,648,676
<PP&E>                                       1,762,961
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,091,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,093,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          306,124
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,045
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,611,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,093,398
<SALES>                                        289,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               289,687
<CGS>                                          175,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  794,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (426,787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (426,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (426,787)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1)      	The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Dated:  August 11, 2010 |  | By:  RALPH M. AMATO                   
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                        |  | RALPH M. AMATO
Chief Financial Officer
ROCKY MOUNT WEH LP, Plaintiff, v. Elmer Douglas LANGSTON; Elizabeth Lucas Langston; Albert E. Brice; April L. Brice; and First South Bank, Defendants.

No. COA15-988.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Reversed and Remanded.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-75,988 & AP-75,989

EX PARTE ROBBY NEAL SCOTT, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 9015-A & 9211-A IN THE 316TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HUTCHINSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of arson and

possession of more than four ounces of marihuana in a drug free zone and sentenced to twenty years’

and ten years’ imprisonment, respectively. There was no appeal from these convictions.

Applicant contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

inform Applicant of a plea offer to dismiss a motion to revoke the community supervision on the

marihuana charge if Applicant pled to the arson charge for a fifteen year sentence. The trial court
SCOTT - 2

conducted a hearing at which the district attorney testified he made the offer, and Applicant and his

family testified that no such offer was made to them, and Applicant testified he would have accepted.

The trial court has determined that trial counsel was ineffective because he did not convey the offer

to Applicant. Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). 

Relief is granted. The judgments of conviction in Case Nos. 9015 & 9211 in the 316th

Judicial District Court of Hutchinson County are set aside. Applicant is remanded to the custody of

the Sheriff of Hutchinson County to answer the charges against him.

A copy of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division.

Delivered: September 10, 2008

Do Not Publish
Robert Fuhs, Sr. v. Summer Fuhs, Constance C. Moore, and Legal Aid of North Carolina, Inc.

No. 98P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Randolph M. James, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, for Fuhs, Robert (Sr.).

T. Richard Kane, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Fuhs, Summer, et al.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of March 2016 by Plaintiff in this *26matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136633 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136633 

 COA: 284072 

Ionia CC: 06-013398-FH 

JOSHUA ROBERT FARRAR,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. Sean Christopher WHITE.

No. COA15-871.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 2, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General notice.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the following Customs broker licenses are cancelled without prejudice. Name
License No.
Issuing portMarketMakers, Inc.
14666
Miami.General Brokerage Services, Inc.
07283
Miami.
 Dated: September 8, 2005. Jayson P. Ahern, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.


[FR Doc. 05-18362 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-06-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Quacey Jamar McFADDEN.

No. COA15-957.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2008 – REWE‐Zentral v OHIM (Port Louis)**

**(Case T-230/06)**

Community trade mark – Application for the Community word mark PORT LOUIS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Designation of the geographical origin of the goods – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation(EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods – Marks devoid of any distinctive character (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b) and (c)) (see paras 39, 45, 54, 65-66,
70-72)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 June 2006 (Case R 25/2006-1) concerning an application to register the word mark PORT LOUIS as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | REWE-Zentral AG |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark Port Louis for goods in Classes 18, 24 and 25 – Application No 3664133 |
| Decision of the examiner: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 21 June 2006 (Case R 25/2006-1); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United States Code**

 

I, Michael T. Willis,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of Westaff, Inc.(the “Company”), that, to the best of my knowledge;

 
| (1)    |   | The  Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended  July 12, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    |   | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                           |

 
| Date: | August 26, 2008 |
|-------|----------------------|

 

 
| /s/ Michael T. Willis                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael T. Willis                      |   |
| Westaff, Inc.                     |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by § 906 has been providedto Westaff, Inc. and will be retained by Westaff, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on 
Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-05707, 333-21787 and 333-21769) and Form S-8 (File 
Nos. 33-88606 and 333-19603) of Beacon Properties Corporation of our report
dated January 28, 1997 on our audits of the consolidated financial position of
Beacon Properties Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the period May 26, 1994 to December 31, 1994 and
the combined results of operations and cash flows of The Beacon Group,
predecessor to Beacon Properties Corporation, for the period January 1, 1994 to
May 25, 1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We
also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the financial
statement schedules of Beacon Properties Corporation as of December 31, 1996.




                                           /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Boston, Massachusetts
April 4, 1997
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136267 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136267 

 COA: 282646 

Kent CC: 05-006579-FC 

DESMOND KEAYON JOSEPH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
State of North Carolina v. Mason W. Hyde

No. 88P15-3

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 5, 2016

Mason W. Hyde, Pro se.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of N.C.

James R. Grant, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Hyde, Mason White

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 5th of July 2016 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Davie County:

*394"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of July 2016."
# C_2008022EN.01001801.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/18

---

Order of the Court of 4 October 2007 — Republic of Finland v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-457/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Measure not having binding legal effects - European Communities' own resources - Infringement procedure - Article 11 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 - Interest for late payment - Negotiations for an agreement on a conditional payment - Refusal letter)

(2008/C 22/34)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: E. Bygglin, Agent)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Wilms and P. Aalto, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2006 in Case T-350/05 Finland v Commission dismissing as inadmissible an application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 8 July 2005 refusing to enter into negotiations with the Republic of Finland on the possibility of paying provisionally the customs duties on defence equipment claimed by the Commission in proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations — Acts against which an action may be brought

Finland

Commission

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---