alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                2,467,864
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           625,271
<ALLOWANCES>                           (57,492)
<INVENTORY>                           9,914,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              0
<PP&E>                                2,639,794
<DEPRECIATION>                        (650,214)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       16,964,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         0
<BONDS>                              10,499,852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                              2,905,514
<OTHER-SE>                            2,130,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         16,964,366
<SALES>                               9,040,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      9,148,235
<CGS>                                 7,825,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         8,897,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        7,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         300,640
<INCOME-TAX>                            120,594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            180,046
<EPS-BASIC>                               .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0


</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136449 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136449 

 COA: 284343 

Oakland CC: 2007-217681-FH 

KENNETH JAMES HILL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
ALEXIS v. SHAW.

No. S15A1475.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Oct. 19, 2015.

Grady Alexander Roberts, III, Roberts Law, LLC, Atlanta, for appellant.

John Antoine Bailey Ayoub, Carolina Dallal Bryant, Ayoub & Mansour, LLC, Atlanta, for appellee.

**Opinion**

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

*Affirmed without opinion.*

All the Justices concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10946

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BYRON CHRISENBERRY

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

Northern for the District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-3-14

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Byron Chrisenberry appeals his 240-month sentence following his guilty

plea for conspiracy to distribute and possess with the intent to distribute more

than 500 grams of methamphetamine. Chrisenberry avers that his sentence is

unreasonable because the district court failed to consider as required by 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6) whether the sentence imposed resulted in an unwarranted

sentencing disparity between himself and his codefendants. Because the district

court correctly calculated and reviewed Chrisenberry’s guidelines range, the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10946

2

court“necessarily gave significant weight and consideration to the need to avoid

unwarranted disparities.” See Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 599 (2007).

The factthat Chrisenberry’s sentence was within the pertinent guidelines range

reduces this court’s concern with sentencing disparities to a “minimum.” See

United States v. Willingham, 497 F.3d 541, 545 (5th Cir. 2007). Moreover, the

district court was aware of the sentences of the codefendants, who had

cooperated with the Government and received downward departures. 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2004D-0251]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Requests for Inspection by an 
Accredited Person Under the Inspection by Accredited Persons Program

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Requests for Inspection by an 
Accredited Person Under the Inspection by Accredited Persons Program'' 
has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 7, 2005 (70 
FR 33179), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0569. 
The approval expires on August 31, 2008. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: September 7, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18222 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Exhibit 12.1

                             BERRY PLASTICS CORPORATION
             STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  (in Thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Fiscal
                                        _______________________________________________

(Dollars in thousands)                      1998     1999      2000     2001     2002
<S>                                         <C>     <C>       <C>      <C>     <C>
Earnings:
    Income (loss) before income taxes      $(7,819) $(8,584) $(22,227) $(1,361) $(3,990)
    Interest expense                        35,555   40,819    51,457   54,355   49,254
    Interest portion of rental expense       1,805    2,427     3,061    2,764    3,254
                                           -------   -------   -------  -------  -------
       Earnings                           $ 29,541  $34,662  $ 32,291  $55,758  $48,518
                                           ========  =======   =======  =======  =======

Fixed Charges:
    Interest expense                       $34,778  $39,372   $49,750  $53,766  $48,410
    Interest portion of rental expense       1,805    2,427     3,061    2,764    3,254
                                           -------  -------    ------- -------  -------
      Fixed charges                        $36,583  $41,799   $52,811  $56,530  $51,664
                                           =======  =======    =======  ======  =======

    Ratio (Deficiency) of earnings to
cover fixed charges                           0.8x     0.8x      0.6x     1.0x     0.9x
</TABLE>
State v. Christopher Allen McKiver

213P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 6, 2016

Ms. Kimberly P. Hoppin, Attorney at Law, For McKiver, Christopher Allen.

Mr. Joseph E. Herrin, Mr. Daniel P. O'Brien Special Deputy Attorneys General, Mr. Ben R. David, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of June 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of June 2016."
1511.

#### Jolly *v.*The State.

Accusation of assault and battery, from city court of Oglethorpe- ■ — Judge Greer. October 14, 1908.

Argued December 8, 1908.

Decided January 27, 1909.

*Hixon & Greer, L. J. Blalock,*for plaintiff in error.

*Jule Felton, solicitor,-*contra.

Russell, J.

The determination of the credibility of the witnesses is so-exclusively within the province of the jury that the verdict finding a defendant guilty is not affected by the fact that that verdict is supported by the testimony of only one witness, whose testimony is directly in conflict with a large number of witnesses who had equal opportunity of knowing the facts, and' who, so far as appears from the record, are-worthy of credit. In the absence of any error on the part of the court or any irregularity which may have prejudiced the defendant, such a verdict, approved by the trial judge, is absolutely conclusive; because this court is without jurisdiction to review a finding upon the-facts, which is supported by sufficient evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Universal Automotive
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Arvin Scott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Robert W. Zimmer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Arvin Scott
---------------

Name:  Arvin Scott

Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 13, 2003

/s/ Robert W. Zimmer
--------------------

Name: Robert W. Zimmer
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Date:  November 13, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

See also the certification pursuant to Sec. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, which is also attached to this Report.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                DOCUMENTUM, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA; UNAUDITED)
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                        Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                             June 30,              June 30,
                                        ------------------    -----------------
                                         1997       1996       1997       1996
                                        -------   -------     -------   -------
<S>                                     <C>       <C>         <C>       <C> 
Net Income                              $ 1,447   $   867     $ 2,564   $ 1,399 
                                        =======   =======     =======   =======

Primary shares outstanding:
  Weighted average shares outstanding
   during the period                     14,200    13,947      14,187    13,519
  Common stock equivalent shares            605       991         656     1,016
                                        -------   -------     -------   -------
                                         14,805    14,938      14,843    14,535
                                        =======   =======     =======   =======
Primary net income per
 common stock and common stock
 equivalent share (1)                   $  0.10   $  0.06     $  0.17   $  0.10
                                        =======   =======     =======   =======
</TABLE> 

(1) Fully diluted earnings per share is not required to be presented.

                                      20.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Exhibit 27.2
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         5,072
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 36,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,386
<INVENTORY>                                    2,559
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              50,773
<PP&E>                                       110,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                32,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               131,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         41,413
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         390
<OTHER-SE>                                    63,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 131,865
<SALES>                                      102,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             102,243
<CGS>                                         71,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 71,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              12,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 654
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               17,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,128
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           11,257
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  11,257
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.49
        


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Audwin Pierre LINDSAY, Jr.

No. COA15-618.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Dec. 1, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
COMMSCOPE CREDIT UNION v. BUTLER AND BURKE, LLP, et al.

No. 5PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 25, 2016.

Alfred P. Carlton, Jr., Raleigh, for Commscope Credit Union.

L. Oliver Noble, Jr., Hickory, for Commscope Credit Union.

Michael Joseph Barnett, for Commscope Credit Union.

Frederick K. Sharpless, Greensboro, for Butler & Burke, LLP.

Christopher Carlisle Lam, Charlotte, for Graham, Barry D., et al.

Camden R. Webb, Raleigh, for Pope, Todd, et al.

J. Mitchell Armbruster, Raleigh, for NCACPA, AICPA, and Center for Audit Quality.

Michael W. Mitchell, Raleigh, for NCACPA, AICPA, and Center for Audit Quality.

Lauren H. Bradley, Raleigh, for NCACPA, AICPA, and Center for Audit Quality.

Brent F. Powell, Winston-Salem, for Cherry Bekaert LLP, et al.

C. Mark Wiley, Winston-Salem, for Cherry Bekaert LLP, et al.

Michael R. Cashin, Winston-Salem, for at Law, For Cherry Bekaert LLP, et al.

Mel J. Garofalo, Charlotte, for N.C. Chamber.

Noel L. Allen, Raleigh, for National Association of State Boards of Accountancy.

Nathan E. Standley, for National Association of State Boards of Accountancy.

Ashley E. Eiler, for Butler & Burke, LLP.

Richard A. Simpson, for Butler & Burke, LLP.

Brian D. Boone, Charlotte, for Chamber of Commerce of the USA.

Ian S. Richardson, for Commscope Credit Union.

James C. Smith, for Graham, Barry D., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of April 2016 by Third Party Defendants to Substitute Counsel:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of April 2016."
LIPE v. STARR DAVIS COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 445P14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

M. Duane Jones, Charlotte, for Travelers Casualty & Surety.

Hatcher B. Kincheloe, Charlotte.

Michael B. Pross, Salisbury, for Lipe, Shirley, et al.

Cathy A. Williams, Salisbury, for Lipe, Shirley, et al.

Jeri L. Whitfield, Greensboro, for N.C. Chamber and N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

Elizabeth Brooks Scherer, Raleigh, for N.C. Chamber and N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of December 2014 by Defendant (Travelers Casualty & Surety) for Temporary Stay:

> *841"Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
Robert Alan LILLIE v. Michael BALL, Superintendent of Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution.

No. 421P10-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 18, 2016.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Robert Alan Lillie, for Lillie, Robert Alan.

Patrick Nadolski, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 16th of May 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of May 2016."
HOLT, et al. v. NC DOT.

No. 76A16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 2016.

Melody R. Hairston, Assistant Attorney General, for NC DOT.

Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, for NC DOT.

Fred W. DeVore, III, Charlotte, for Holt, Daniel, et al.

Amanda A. Mingo, Charlotte, for Holt, Daniel, et al.

F. William DeVore, IV, Charlotte, for Holt, Daniel.

*478Derek P. Adler, Charlotte, for Holt, Daniel, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of March 2016 by Plaintiffs to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss Appeal:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1835]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Emphasis Panel, Postbacculaureate Research Education 
Program.
    Date: February 18, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Richard I. Martinez, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher 
Building, Room 3AN-12B, 45 Center Drive MSC 6200, Bethesda, MD 
20892-6200, 301-594-2849, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#32405f040154725c5b5a1c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9abb4efeabf99b7b0b1f7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-1835 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE of North Carolina, v. Terry Lyn PEGRAM, Defendant.

No. COA14-921.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Sept. 1, 2015.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINON**

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 12, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00052

- CV

Billy C. WHITFIELD and Carolyn Whitfield

,

Appellant s

v.

Charles Thomas ONDREJ , et al.,

Appellee s

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 10

- 00231

- CVK Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellees ’ second motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. The appellees’ brief is due on or before July 1, 2016. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of May, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NIES v. TOWN OF EMERALD ISLE.

No. 409PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 5, 2016.

J. David Breemer, Sacramento, for Nies, Gregory P., et al.

Keith P. Anthony, Durham, for Nies, Gregory P., et al.

Brian E. Edes, Wilmington, for Town of Emerald Isle.

Norwood P. Blanchard, III, for Town of Emerald Isle.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 4th of May 2016 by Plaintiffs:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of May 2016."

Plaintiffs shall have up to and including the 23rd day of May 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.