alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex4_1.htm










	 		 	
ROSS MILLER


Secretary of State


204 North Carson Street, Suite 1


Carson City, Nevada 89701-4520


(775) 684-5708


Website: www.nvsos.gov













	
Certificate of Correction

	  
	
(PURSUANT TO NRS CHAPTERS 78,

	  
	
78A, 80, 81, 82, 84, 86, 87, 87A, 88,

	  
	
88A, 89 AND 92A)

	  











	
USE BLACK INK ONLY - DO NOT HIGHLIGHT

	
Certificate of Correction

	
ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

















(Pursuant to NRS Chapters 78, 78A, 80, 81, 82, 84, 86, 87, 87A, 88, 88A, 89 and 92A)







1. The name of the entity for which correction is being made:





	
China Broadband, Inc.


 












2. Description of the original document for which correction is being made:





	
Certificate of Designation of Series B Preferred Stock of China Broadband, Inc.


 







 



	
3. Filing date of the original document for which correction is being made:

	
July 30, 2010












4. Description of the inaccuracy or defect:



	
Section 2 "Authorization" inadvertently states that China Broadband, Inc. "shall have the authority to issue 6,000,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock, par value US$0.001 per share, of the Company".  When the Board of Directors approved the Certificate of Designations of Series B Stock, the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock authorized was 11,000,000, not 6,000,000.


 












5. Correction of the inaccuracy or defect:





	
Section 2 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


	  
	
2.  Authorization.  China Broadband, Inc. (the “Company”) shall have the authority to issue 11,000,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock, par value US$0.001 per share, of the Company (the “Series B Preferred Stock”).  Such number of shares may be increased or decreased, but not to a number less than the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock then issued and outstanding, by resolution adopted by the full Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company.


 












6. Signature:








	/s/ Marc Urbach	  	
President

	  	
November 22, 2010


	
Authorized Signature

	  	
Title *

	  	
Date












* If entity is a corporation, it must be signed by an officer if stock has been issued, OR an incorporator or director if stock has not been issued; a limited-liability company, by a manager or managing members; a limited partnership or limited-liability limited partnership, by a general partner; a limited-liability partnership, by a managing partner; a business trust, by a trustee.


 


 


IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit with the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.








	
This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees.

	
Nevada Secretary of State Correction


	  	
Revised: 3-26-09
# C_2008285EN.01003601.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/36

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 2008 — Oakley v OHIM — Venticinque (O STORE)

(Case T-116/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark O STORE - Earlier national word mark THE O STORE - Comparison of services provided in connection with retail trade with corresponding goods - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Application for alteration made by the intervener - Article 134(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance)

(2008/C 285/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Oakley, Inc. (One Icon, Foothill Ranch, United States) (represented by: M. Huth-Dierig and M. Nentwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Venticinque Ltd (Hailsham, East Sussex, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Caneva, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 January 2006 (Joined Cases R 682/2004-1 and R 685/2004-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between Venticinque Ltd and Oakley, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Oakley, Inc., to pay the costs, except those incurred by the intervener; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Oakley, Inc., to pay the costs, except those incurred by the intervener;

| 3. | Orders Venticinque Ltd to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Venticinque Ltd to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 154, 1.7.2006.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a request for reclearance of a revised information collection. SF 3102, Designation of Beneficiary (FERS), is used by an employee or an annuitant covered under the Federal Employees Retirement System to designate a beneficiary to receive any lump sum due in the event of his/her death. 

Approximately 2,893 SF 3102 forms are completed annually. Each form takes approximately 15 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden is 723 hours. 

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, FAX (202) 418-3251 or via e-mail to                         *mbtoomey@opm.gov.*                         Please include a mailing address with your request.                     

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar days from the date of this publication. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to— 

Pamela S. Israel, Chief, Operations Support Group, Retirement Services Programs, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415; and 

Brenda Aguilar, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. 

For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination—Contact: Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/Support Group, (202) 606-0623. 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

Linda M. Springer, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 05-18141 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-38-P
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THE LANDS COUNCIL; WILD WEST 

INSTITUTE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

No. 07-35000 RANOTTA MCNAIR, Forest

Supervisor for the Idaho D.C. No.

Panhandle National Forests; CV-06-00425-EJL 

UNITED District of Idaho, STATES FOREST SERVICE,

Defendants-Appellees, Boise

BOUNDARY COUNTY; CITY OF ORDER

BONNERS FERRY; CITY OF MOYIE

SPRINGS; EVERHART LOGGING, INC.;

REGEHR LOGGING, INC.,

Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees. 

Filed September 11, 2008

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Pamela Ann Rymer,

Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Michael Daly Hawkins,

Barry G. Silverman, M. Margaret McKeown,

Raymond C. Fisher, Marsha S. Berzon, Richard R. Clifton,

Milan D. Smith, Jr., and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

All judges of the court have been advised of PlaintiffsAppellants’ petition for rehearing en banc by the full court,

and no judge has requested a vote on it. The petition is

DENIED. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). 

13023
PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David P. Anastasi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)  To the best of my
knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/    DAVID P. ANASTASIDavid P. Anastasi President and Chief Executive Officer





November 14, 2002
**Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 29 January 2007 – Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies v Commission**

**(Case T-423/05 R)**

Interim measures – Suspension of operation – State aid – Urgency

1.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Urgency
– Prima facie case – Cumulative requirements (Arts 225(1) EC, 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First
Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 62-64)*

2.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Urgency
(Arts 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 66-69)*

3.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Serious and irreparable
damage (Art. 242 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 70-71)*

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| APPLICATION for the suspension of operation of Article 2(1) in combination with Article 1(2) to (4) of the Commission’s decision concerning State aid (C 11/2004 (ex NN 4/2003) – Olympic Airways – Restructuring and privatisation) of 14 September 2005. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Dismisses the application for interim measures; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Reserves the costs. |
STATE v. Delton MAYNOR.

No. 241P11-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Delton Maynor, for Maynor, Delton.

Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of July 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review of Writ of Certiorari:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18171]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Science.
    Date: October 20-21, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Park Hotel, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Jeanette M. Hosseini, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Center For Complementary and Alternative 
Medicine, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
594-9096.

    Dated: September 6, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18171 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
# C_2005082EN.01004301.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/43

---

Action brought on 22 January 2005 by Agroexpansión S.A. against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-38/05)

(2005/C 82/76)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 January 2005 by Agroexpansión S.A., Madrid (Spain), represented by Jaime Folguera Crespo and Patricia Vidal Martínez, of the Madrid Bar.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | partially annul Article 3 of the Decision of the Commission of 20 October 2004, reducing the amount of the fine imposed on Agroexpansión; |
| --- | --- |

1.

partially annul Article 3 of the Decision of the Commission of 20 October 2004, reducing the amount of the fine imposed on Agroexpansión;

| 2. | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The decision at issue is the same as in Case T-24/05 Standard Commercial and Others v Commission
   (1).

Standard Commercial and Others

Commission

1

The grounds put forward by the applicant are similar to those relied on in that case (infringement of the principle of equal treatment and of Article 23(2) of Regulation No 1/2003).

In particular, it is alleged that the Commission erred in taking into consideration the consolidated turnover of the group of undertakings headed by DIMON INC., in order to determine the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant. Furthermore, AGROEXPANSION only became part of that group in November 1997.

Moreover, the Commission failed to take account of the attenuating circumstance that the applicant ceased to engage in those practices as soon as it became aware of the Commission's measures of inspection.

---

(1)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

1

---
# C_2023223EN.01001201.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n.o 1 de Palma de Mallorca (Spain) lodged on 20 March 2023 — Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU

(Case C-173/23, Eventmedia Soluciones)

(2023/C 223/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil n.o 1 de Palma de Mallorca

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eventmedia Soluciones SL

Defendant: Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (1) be interpreted as meaning that a national court hearing an action seeking compensation for damage occasioned by delay in the carriage of baggage under Article 19 of the Montreal Convention is required to review of its own motion whether a clause in the contract of carriage that does not allow the passenger to transfer their rights is unfair, where the claim is brought by the transferee[,] who[,] unlike the transferor, is not a consumer or user? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (1) be interpreted as meaning that a national court hearing an action seeking compensation for damage occasioned by delay in the carriage of baggage under Article 19 of the Montreal Convention is required to review of its own motion whether a clause in the contract of carriage that does not allow the passenger to transfer their rights is unfair, where the claim is brought by the transferee[,] who[,] unlike the transferor, is not a consumer or user?

| 2. | If it is appropriate to carry out a review of the court’s own motion, may the obligation to inform the consumer and establish whether they claim that the clause is unfair or consent to it be disregarded in the light of the conclusive act of having transferred their claim in breach of any unfair term that does not permit the claim to be transferred? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If it is appropriate to carry out a review of the court’s own motion, may the obligation to inform the consumer and establish whether they claim that the clause is unfair or consent to it be disregarded in the light of the conclusive act of having transferred their claim in breach of any unfair term that does not permit the claim to be transferred?

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

---
##### 



Exhibit 23 [Letterhead of
McGladrey & Pullen
Certified Public Accountants] Consent of Independent Public Accounting Firm We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-77516, 33-77518 and 333-2702) pertaining to the LaCrosse
Footwear, Inc. Employees Retirement
Savings Plan, the Lacrosse Footwear, Inc. Union Employees Retirement Savings Plan and the LaCrosse
Footwear, Inc. 1993 Employee Stock Incentive Plan of our reports dated January 28, 2005, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004. /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 2005
STATE of North Carolinaz v. Harley Ray ALLIGOOD, Jr.

No. 331P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Harley Ray Alligood, Jr., for Alligood, Harley Ray, Jr.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*568*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th of September 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Beaufort County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
STATE of North Carolina v. Willie Hubert DUBOISE.

No. 56P16.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 2016.

Mark Montgomery, for Duboise, Willie Hubert.

Margaret A. Force, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of February 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the *176decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."
----

(2004/C 65 E/169)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2439/03

by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(16 July 2003)

Subject:   Health hazard posed by fuels in military use

The aircraft fuel Jet-Propellant 8 (JP-8), which is suspected of posing a serious health hazard (cf. for example, New Scientist of 13 June 2001), is present in large quantities in military installations and pipelines throughout the European Union.

The Commission:

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(11 September 2003)

Article 296(1)(b) of the EC Treaty establishes a derogation whereby the Member States may take such measures as they consider necessary for the protection of the essential interests of their security which are connected with the production of or trade in arms, munitions and war materials.

The Member States have systematically interpreted Article 296 in an extensive manner, wishing to maintain strict national control over all aspects of the production of and trade in defence goods, thus excluding the military sector from the application of the EC Treaty rules.

However, the case-law (1) of the Court of Justice interprets this derogation in a more restrictive manner:

This case-law was confirmed by a recent judgment (2) of the Court of Justice, which refers specifically to Article 296.

With this in mind, the Commission can provide the following information in reply to the various questions asked by the Honourable Member:

----

(1)  Case 222/84 Johnston v. Chief Constable [1986] ECR 1651.

(2)  Case 414/97 Commission of the European Communities v. Kingdom of Spain [1999] ECR I-05585.

(3)OJ L 158, 23.6.1990.

(4)OJ L 41, 14.2.2003.

(5)OJ L 183, 29.6.1989.

(6)OJ L 131, 5.5.1998.

(7)OJ L 196, 26.7.1990.

----
**Exhibit 23.2****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 333-127357, 333-42082, 333-47259, 333-68255, 333-77051) of Tier Technologies, Inc. of ourreport dated December 27, 2004, except for the restatement described in Note 1 to the consolidatedfinancial statements (not presented herein), as to which the date is October 23, 2006, relating tothe financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
STATE of North Carolina v. Bryant Jerrell PINNIX.

No. COA15-387.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 1, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Grant
      King, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001,
      that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 19, 2008





/s/
                Grant KingGrant
                KingChief
                Executive Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Arrie A. ARTIS.

No. COA15-339.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 20, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.