alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc., et al.

368P12-4

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 22, 2016

C. David Creech, Attorney at Law, Jay C. Salsman, Attorney at Law, New Bern, for Pitt County Memorial Hospital Incorporated, et al.

Sherif A. Philips, for Philips, Sherif A. (M.D.)

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of July 2016 by Plaintiff to Stay Execution of Judgment:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of July 2016."
Exhibit 32 for 10QSB/A 01/31/2004



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Amended  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Titan
Technologies,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period ended January 31, 2004, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, the undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby  certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     a)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

         Date: May 13, 2004                        /s/ Ronald L. Wilder
                                                   --------------------------
                                                   Ronald L. Wilder, President,
                                                   (Chief Executive Officer)
                                                   (Chief Financial Officer)
CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


LIST OF
SUBSIDIARIES





Set forth below is a list of the Registrants subsidiaries as of January 28, 2002:





Jurisdiction of Organization

Control byName of Subsidiary


Registrant

SubsidiaryCarl Karcher Enterprises, Inc.

California

100%Boston Pacific, Inc.

California

100%Hardees Food Systems, Inc.

North Carolina

100%Flagstar Enterprises, Inc.

Alabama

100%Spardees Realty, Inc.

Alabama



100%HED Inc.

North Carolina



100%Burger Chef Systems, Inc.

North Carolina



100%Hardees LTD, Fribourg

Switzerland



98%Hardees REIT I

Delaware



100%Hardees REIT II

Delaware



100%CKE REIT I, Inc

Delaware

100%CKE REIT, II, Inc.

Delaware

100%Carls Jr. Region VIII, Inc.

Delaware



100%Aeroway, LLC

California

100%Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc.

Delaware

100%Green Burrito, Inc.

California



100%La Salsa, Inc.

Delaware



100%Timber Lodge Steakhouse, Inc.

Minnesota



100%GB Franchise Corporation

California



100%La Salsa of Nevada, Inc.

Nevada



100%La Salsa Franchise, Inc.

California



100%100%
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3755 

To provide that the reinsurance fee for the transitional reinsurance program 

under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act be applied equally 

to all health insurance issuers and group health plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2013 

Mr. PERRY (for himself and Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide that the reinsurance fee for the transitional reinsurance program under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act be applied equally to all health insurance issuers and group health plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Union Tax Fairness 

5 Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF REINSURANCE FEE. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the pay8 ments required to be made by health insurance issuers and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3755 IH

1 third party administrators (on behalf of group health 

2 plans) under section 1341(b)(1)(A) of the Patient Protec3 tion and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18061(b)(1)(A)) 

4 shall be applied equally to all such issuers and administra5 tors and may not be waived on behalf of any such issuer, 

6 administrator or group health plan. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2009006EN.01004501.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/45

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 4 November 2008 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-133/06) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Application for the restitution of personal property - Decision rejecting the complaint drafted in a language other than the official's native language - Action out of time - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2009/C 6/90)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

First, action for annulment of the Commission decision rejecting the applicant's application to have delivered to him, at his current residence, property previously left at the official lodgings assigned to him in Angola and, secondly, a claim for damages

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 22.9.2007, p. 18.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Huaren Organic Products, Inc. (the Company) certifies that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  August 17, 2007 /s/ Fang Jinzhong________________ Fang Jinzhong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2008301EN.01006106.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/61

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 September 2008 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-83/05) (1)

1

(2008/C 301/106)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 30.4.2005.

1

---
# C_2008128EN.01003202.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/32

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 April 2008 — Citigroup and Citibank v OHIM — Citi (CITI)

(Case T-181/05) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative trade mark CITI - Earlier Community word mark CITIBANK - Relative ground for refusal - Reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 128/69)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Citigroup, Inc., formerly Citicorp, (New York, New York, United States), and Citibank, NA, (New York) (represented by: initially V. von Bomhard, A.W. Renck and A. Pohlmann, lawyers, and subsequently by V. von Bomhard, A.W. Renck, and H. O'Neill, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo and D. Botis, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Citi, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Peris Riera, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 March 2005 (Case R 173/2004-1) in respect of opposition proceedings between Citicorp and Citi SL and opposition proceedings between Citibank NA and Citi SL

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 1 March 2005 (Case R 173/2004-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 1 March 2005 (Case R 173/2004-1);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of Citigroup, Inc., and Citibank, NA, including those costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of Citigroup, Inc., and Citibank, NA, including those costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;

| 3. | Orders Citi, SL, to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Citi, SL, to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 9.7.2005.

1

---
# C_2009180EN.01005001.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/50

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 May 2009 — Mayer-Falk v Commission

(Case T-251/06) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents concerning the fight against organised crime and the judicial reform in Bulgaria - Refusal of access - Disappearance of the subject-matter of the dispute - No need to adjudicate)

2009/C 180/93

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Thomas Mayer-Falk (Bruchsal, Germany) (represented by: S. Crosby, solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and A. Antoniadis, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission’s decision of 6 November 2006 refusing to grant the applicant access to two documents relating to the fight against organised crime and to judicial reform in Bulgaria.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | Each party is ordered to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is ordered to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 236, 13.09.2008.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than February 16, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. Nicholas, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. William E. Blomster, Fairmont, Minnesota; to acquire voting 
shares of B & M Bancshares, Inc., Fairmont, Minnesota, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of State Bank of Fairmont, Fairmont, 
Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 27, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-1853 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT 10.4


 


ENDORSEMENT TO 10% SENIOR SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE


 


Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.

New York, New York

November 30, 2010


 


The
10% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 25, 2008 and amended
December 11, 2008, June 25, 2010, July 26, 2010, September 15,
2010, October 15, 2010 and November 15, 2010 (the “Note”) of
Precision Optics Corporation, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”),
payable to the order of Arnold Schumsky (the “Holder”) in an aggregate
principal amount of $50,000 and to which this Endorsement is affixed is hereby
amended in the following respects:


 


1.                                      The term “Stated
Maturity Date” is hereby restated to be “December 1, 2010.”


 


2.                                      Except as
expressly amended by this Endorsement, the Note remains in full force and
effect and the Company hereby reconfirms its obligations thereunder.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be duly executed,
and the Holder has caused this Endorsement to be duly accepted, by their
respective duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above
written.


 


 


	
   

  	
  PRECISION
  OPTICS CORPORATION, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By
  

  	
  /s/
  Richard E. Forkey

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Richard E. Forkey

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Arnold Schumsky

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Arnold
  Schumsky
In the Matter of J.L.A.I.

No. COA15-516.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 15, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Reversed and Remanded.
# C_2008128EN.01002603.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/26

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 11 March 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Genova, Italy) — Consel Gi. Emme Srl v Sistema Logistico dell'Arco Ligure e Alessandrino Srl (SLALA)

(Case C-467/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 128/49)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court (Seventh Chamber) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
# C_2008171EN.01001001.xml

| 5.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 May 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-271/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 96/61/EC - Integrated pollution prevention and control - Incomplete and incorrect transposition)

(2008/C 171/16)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and J.-B. Laignelot, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Partial, incorrect or non-existent transposition of Article 2(2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (9), (10) and (11), Article 3, Article 5, Article 6(1), Article 8, Article 9(3), (4), (5) and (6), Article 10, Article 12(2), Article 13(1) and (2), Article 14, Article 17(2) of Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, and Annex I and Annex IV thereto (OJ 1996 L 257, p. 26) — Lack of correspondence between the material scope of application of the transposition measures and that of the directive — Over-wide power of assessment given to the regional authorities with regard to the operating permits and the situations in which the conditions of the permit must be re-assessed and/or updated

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | By transposing in part or incorrectly Article 2(2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (9), (10) and (11), Article 3, Article 5, Article 6(1), Article 8, Article 9(3), (4), (5) and (6), Article 10, Article 12(2), Article 13(1) and (2) and Article 14 of Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, and Annex I and Annex IV thereto, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

By transposing in part or incorrectly Article 2(2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (9), (10) and (11), Article 3, Article 5, Article 6(1), Article 8, Article 9(3), (4), (5) and (6), Article 10, Article 12(2), Article 13(1) and (2) and Article 14 of Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, and Annex I and Annex IV thereto, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | The Kingdom of Belgium is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Kingdom of Belgium is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211 of 8.9.2007.

1

---
# C_2008022EN.01001402.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 December 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-57/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/86/EC - Right to family reunification - Non-transposition within the prescribed period)

(2008/C 22/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have adopted, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by not having adopted, within the prescribed period, the legislative, regulatory and administrative measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by not having adopted, within the prescribed period, the legislative, regulatory and administrative measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.

1

---
# C_2008051EN.01002401.xml

| 23.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/24

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-481/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Public procurement - Infringement of Article 6(3) of Directive 93/36/EC - General principles of the Treaty - Principle of equal treatment and obligation of transparency - National rules allowing use of the negotiated procedure for public supply contracts relating to certain medical equipment)

(2008/C 51/38)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Patakia and X. Lewis, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: S. Chala and D. Tsagkaraki, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 6(3) of Council Directive 93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p. 1) and of the obligation to ensure effective and fair competition — National provision placing all material for medical use into categories and setting a specific maximum price for each category — Provision forming part of a legislative framework which allows use of the negotiated procedure for public supply contracts in respect of whole groups of products of that nature which are not comparable

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by retaining in force Article 7(2) of Law 2955/2001 relating to the ‘Supplies of hospitals and other health units of regional health and pension schemes and other provisions’ and Joint Ministerial Decisions DY6a/oik.38611 and DY6a/oik.38609 of 12 April 2005, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6(3) of Council Directive 93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts, as amended by Commission Directive 2001/78/EC of 13 September 2001 and has infringed general principles of the Treaty, in particular equal treatment and the obligation of transparency; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by retaining in force Article 7(2) of Law 2955/2001 relating to the ‘Supplies of hospitals and other health units of regional health and pension schemes and other provisions’ and Joint Ministerial Decisions DY6a/oik.38611 and DY6a/oik.38609 of 12 April 2005, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6(3) of Council Directive 93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts, as amended by Commission Directive 2001/78/EC of 13 September 2001 and has infringed general principles of the Treaty, in particular equal treatment and the obligation of transparency;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 29, 2008

Mr. Donald Colleluori

Figari & Davenport, LLP 

901 Main Street, Suite 3400

Dallas, TX 75202

Mr. B. Daniel Berryman

Kirkley & Berryman, L.L.P.

100 N Forest Park, Blvd Suite 220

Fort Worth, TX 76102

RE:Case Number:  06-0247

Court of Appeals Number:  02-04-00120-CV

Trial Court Number:  141-190403-01

Style:ULICO CASUALTY COMPANY

v.

ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0247Page 1**