alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research Committee Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation Research Committee                    

*Date:*                         October 17, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Double Tree Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Quirijn Vos, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC, 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 451-2666,                         *qvos@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 54948)    
Dated: September 12, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-18601 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
----

(2004/C 65 E/124)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2097/03

by Paul Lannoye (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(25 June 2003)

Subject:   Kingdom of Belgium — federated bodies — Region of Wallonia — debudgetisation practices

In a press release of 3 April 2003 the Government of Wallonia announced that it had adopted a new financial plan for the development of the Wallonian airports. The Government of Wallonia thus agreed to the twofold financial plan presented at the board meeting of 20 March 2003 of the Société wallonne des aéroports (Sowaer, s.a.), a public-interest company responsible for the development of Wallonian airport infrastructure and the implementation and financing of environmental accompanying measures for the benefit of those living near the airports (purchase of buildings and sound-proofing). The twofold financial plan shows that the overall cost of Wallonia's airport policy will amount to EUR 754,7 million by 2024 and that this sum will not be financed from the Region of Wallonia's budget, but through loans, most of which will be repaid as of 2009 or 2015. This is evidence of a worrying debudgetisation phenomenon affecting more than EUR 750 million.

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(4 August 2003)

The government deficit and debt that are relevant for the purpose of the Stability and Growth Pact are defined in the Protocol on the Excessive Deficit Procedure and in Council Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 of 22 November 1993 (4), as amended (5), through cross-references to the European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA95). According to the Protocol, the relevant sector is ‘general government, that is central government, regional or local government and social security funds, to the exclusion of commercial operations’.

General government is defined on an institutional basis, and not on a functional basis. Thus, only units of which the principal function is the production of non-market services or the redistribution of resources are included. Accordingly, the government-owned units dealing with commercial operations, such as public enterprises, are excluded from general government and classified as financial or non-financial corporations.

In the Belgian national accounts, compiled according to the ESA95 rules, the Société wallonne des aéroports (Sowaer, SA) is classified in the sector of non-financial corporations, and not as general government. Therefore, investment spending by Sowaer does not have any direct impact on the Belgian general government deficit, and the Sowaer financial liabilities are not government debt. However, subsidies, capital transfers and other grants by the Belgian Government to Sowaer, if any, are recorded as government expenditure, thus increasing the government deficit and debt.

----

(1)OJ C 236, 2.8.1997, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 6.

(4)OJ L 332, 31.12.1993.

(5)  Council Regulation (EC) No 475/2000 of 28 February 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 on the application of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community, OJ L 58, 3.3.2000.

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Jennifer BATAYNEH.

No. COA15-132.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Dec. 1, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Prejudicial Error.
PROSPERITY-HEATH, LLC, Virginia S. Heath, and William Heath, Plaintiffs, v. CAPITAL BANK, N.A., Defendant.

No. COA15-976.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Dismissed.
State of North Carolina v. Daniel Lynn Bowlin

No. 99P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Ann B. Petersen, Attorney at Law, For Bowlin, Daniel Lynn.

Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, Brandy Cook, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

James R. Glover, Attorney at Law.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of March 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
RL REGI NORTH CAROLINA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LIGHTHOUSE COVE, LLC, Lighthouse Cove Development Corp., Inc., Glen C. Stygar, John R. Lancaster, Leticia S. Lancaster, Lionel L. Yow, and Connie S. Yow, Defendants.

No. COA15-641.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 1, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
|   | EXHIBIT      32.1 |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION |
|--------|---------------|

|   | PURSUANT TO      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 1) I have      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Titan Technologies,      Inc.; |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) Based on      my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      quarterly report; and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3)  Based      on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information      contained in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material      respects, the financial condition, results of operations  and      cash flows of the Company as of and for the periods presented in this      quarterly report; |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  June      19, 2009 |
|--------------------------------------|

| /s/      Ronald L. Wilder |
|---------------------------|

| Ronald L.      Wilder, President |
|----------------------------------|

| (Chief      Executive Officer) |
|--------------------------------|

| (Chief      Financial Officer) |
|--------------------------------|
STATE of North Carolina v. Gregory S. DRAYTON.

No. COA15-621.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 16, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**RECKSONOPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.**

 

**Certificationof Gregory F. Hughes, Treasurer of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole generalpartner of the Registrant, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18of the United States Code**

 

I, Gregory F.Hughes,Treasurer of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole general partner of RecksonOperating Partnership, L. P. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1)  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 12,  2008 |   |                                              |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                           | By     |  /s/  GREGORY F. HUGHES                      |
|                           |   |  Gregory  F. Hughes                          |
|                           |   |  Treasurer                                   |
|                           |   |  of  Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC,             |
|                           |   |  the  sole general partner of the Registrant |

 

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 NOV-01-1997
(PERIOD-END)                   APR-30-1998
<CASH>                             698,178
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                      771,676
<ALLOWANCES>                      (58,789)
<INVENTORY>                     11,132,308
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0
<PP&E>                           2,645,441
<DEPRECIATION>                   (529,541)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  17,376,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0
<BONDS>                         56,836,149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                         3,484,560
<OTHER-SE>                    (44,597,129)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    17,376,670
<SALES>                          8,458,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 8,637,429
<CGS>                            5,646,881
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    6,560,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  40,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  2,067,038
<INCOME-TAX>                       835,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                     1,231,538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.35
        

</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 65 E/203)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2658/03

by Manuel Pérez Álvarez (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(10 September 2003)

Subject:   Allseas Group

While the European Parliament was debating the new directive on minimum training levels for workers at sea, there appeared virtually simultaneous press reports that the Swiss oil tanker company Allseas Group wanted to replace its Galician crews with Filipinos; 50 of the 600 employees have already been notified of their dismissal. The reason, according to the media, is the low cost of employing Filipino manpower.

Answer given by Ms Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(22 October 2003)

----

(1)OJ L 225, 12.8.1998.

----
# CE2004078EN.01044802.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/448 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/448

---

(2004/C 78 E/0471)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3068/03

by Hugues Martin (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 October 2003)

Subject:   Funding of bodies which play host to an Info-Point Europe

Subject:

According to my sources, following the entry into force, on 1 January 2003, of the new Financial Regulation applicable to all the European institutions (Council Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 (1)) and its implementing procedures, the operating subsidies hitherto granted to bodies which play host to an Info-Point Europe will henceforth be awarded on the basis of a new procedure. Instead of receiving automatic funding, these information centres will be required to take part in an invitation-to-tender procedure, failing which they will not be eligible for subsidies.

1

In addition to the operating subsidies, the bodies in question also received logistical support, such as supplies of publications, access to the ‘relays and networks Intranet’, back-up from the relays and networks helpdesk, in the form of documentary and technical assistance, from the meeting of relay heads, etc. It has been decided that bodies which submit an appropriate request will continue to receive this logistical support, on a temporary basis, in 2004.

This new procedure, which is intended to increase transparency in connection with the award of funding, raises three questions to which the European Commission alluded without providing a detailed answer:

| — | What criteria will be used to select the bodies which respond to the invitations to tender? |
| --- | --- |

—

What criteria will be used to select the bodies which respond to the invitations to tender?

| — | Will the logistical support measures continue after 2004? |
| --- | --- |

—

Will the logistical support measures continue after 2004?

| — | In more general terms, the European Commission is now considering new forms of cooperation which will ensure that information is readily available to the public locally, whilst complying with the new rules laid down in the above-mentioned Financial Regulation. Can the Commission be more precise on this point? |
| --- | --- |

—

In more general terms, the European Commission is now considering new forms of cooperation which will ensure that information is readily available to the public locally, whilst complying with the new rules laid down in the above-mentioned Financial Regulation. Can the Commission be more precise on this point?

---

(1)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

1

---
### NUMBER 13

- 1 9

- 00 5 84

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

DEAN EDWARD BARRERA

, A ppellant

,

v.

RUBY VENUS

, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 445 th District Court

of Cameron County , Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes

Appellant, Dean Edward Barrera , appealed a judgment entered by the 445th

District Court in Cameron County, Texas in cause nu m ber 2018

- DCL

- 06103

- I.

App e llant h a s f iled a mo t ion to dismiss his ap p eal. M o r e tha n te n da y s ha v e passed

,

an d appe l le e ha s no t file d a r e spon s e t o th e mot i o n to di s mi s s

. Se e T E X

. R. A PP

. P.

1 0 .3 (a).2 Th e C o urt

, h a vin g con s id e r e d th e do c ument s o n fi l e an d appe l la n t ’ s mo t io n

to di s mi s s t h e app e al

, i s o f th e op i ni o n th a t t h e mot i o n s hou l d b e g r a nted

. Se e T E X

.

R. A PP

. P

. 4 2.1 ( a )

. Bas e d o n ou r r e v ie w o f th e r e co r d

, d i sm i s s a l o f th e app e a l w ou l d

no t p r e v ent a pa r t y fro m s eek i n g r el i e f t o w hi c h i t w ou l d o t h e r w i s e b e ent i t l ed

. Se e

i d

. 42. 1 (a)(1). Ac c o r di ng l y

, appe l la n t ’ s mot i o n t o di s mi s s i s g r a nted

, an d th e appea l i s

hereby D I S M ISS E D

. Pend i n g mot i ons

, i f an y

, a r e l i k e w i s e D IS M ISS E D

. C os t s w i l l

b e t a x ed a g ai n s t appe l la n t

. Se e i d

. 4 2

. 1 ( d ) (“ Absen t a g r e emen t o f th e pa r t i es

, th e

cou r t w i l l tax co s t s a g ai n s t th e a ppe l la n t .” )

. Ha v in g d i sm i s s e d t h e appe a l a t

ap p el l ant ’ s r e q ues t

, no mot i o n fo r r e hea r in g w i l l b e en t e r ta i ned

, an d ou r mandat e w i l l

i s su e forth w i t h.

GREGORY T. PERKES

Justice

D elivered and filed the

20th day of December, 2019.
# C_2008272EN.01001801.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/18

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 — France v Commission

(Case T-370/05) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Wine sector - Restructuring aid and conversion aid - Definition of eligible area)

(2008/C 272/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented: initially by G. de Bergues and A. Colomb, and subsequently by G. de Bergues and A.-L. During, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Nolin, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2005/579/EC of 20 July 2005 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2005 L 199, p. 84), inasmuch as it excludes from Community financing certain expenditure in respect of a correction relating to determination of the areas eligible for aid for restructuring and conversion of vineyards for the 2001-2003 accounting period.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2005/579/EC of 20 July 2005, Commission Decision of 20 July 2005 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) inasmuch as it excludes from Community financing the sum of EUR 13 519 122,05 in respect of a correction relating to determination of the areas eligible for aid for restructuring and conversion of vineyards for the 2001-2003 accounting period. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2005/579/EC of 20 July 2005, Commission Decision of 20 July 2005 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) inasmuch as it excludes from Community financing the sum of EUR 13 519 122,05 in respect of a correction relating to determination of the areas eligible for aid for restructuring and conversion of vineyards for the 2001-2003 accounting period.

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 10.12.2005.

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136707 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

TAMARA CIARAMITARO,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136707 

 COA: 284781 

WCAC: 07-000307 

GREEKTOWN CASINO, L.L.C., FAIRMONT 

INSURANCE COMPANY and ACCIDENT 

FUND INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
STATE v. David Matthew LOWE.

No. 278PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 20, 2016.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, for Lowe, David Matthew.

Derrick Mertz, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 20th of April 2016 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of April 2016."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 9th day of May 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Owen D. Leavitt v. State of North Carolina

No. 191P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Owen D. Leavitt, Pro Per.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, Michael D. Waters, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 18th of May 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of May 2016 by *377Petitioner for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of May 2016 by Petitioner to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."