alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136464 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136464 

 COA: 275244 

Montmorency CC: 06-001399-FC 

DAVID AARON GOODWILL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 10, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Consolidated Financial Statements of Maxcor Financial Group Inc. at and as of
September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
Consoldated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1998                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                    JUL-01-1998                    JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1998                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                              9,094,223                      9,094,223
<RECEIVABLES>                      21,678,225                     21,678,225
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                         0                              0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                       0                              0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                15,385,490                     15,385,490
<PP&E>                             10,384,042                     10,384,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     83,028,811                     83,028,811
<SHORT-TERM>                                0                              0
<PAYABLES>                         10,831,187                     10,831,187
<REPOS-SOLD>                                0                              0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                         0                              0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                          0                              0
<LONG-TERM>                         6,093,210                      6,093,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0                              0
<PREFERRED>                                 0                              0
<COMMON>                               11,392                         11,392
<OTHER-SE>                         30,904,565                     30,904,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       83,028,811                     83,028,811
<TRADING-REVENUE>                     334,118                        775,767
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                  347,495                      1,130,100
<COMMISSIONS>                      37,985,620                    115,940,843
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>               0                              0
<FEE-REVENUE>                               0                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    213,558                        698,898
<COMPENSATION>                     25,187,131                     78,116,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     1,643,273                      3,817,576
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>          1,643,273                      3,817,576
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0                              0
<CHANGES>                                   0                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           65,770                       (734,397)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.01                          (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.01                          (0.06)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                           5,611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,834
<INVENTORY>                                     36,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,897
<PP&E>                                          35,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,358
<BONDS>                                         16,127
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,747
<SALES>                                         30,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,880
<CGS>                                           20,652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,627
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    757
<INCOME-TAX>                                       268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                489
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       489
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit      12.1**

| **Earnings                to Fixed Charges**      |   |   |   |   |   |    |   |   |     |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------|--------|--------|----------|
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |    |   |   |     |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |    |   |   |     |
|                                              |   | 2002   |   | 2003   |   | 2004    |   | 2005   |     |
| Earnings:                                         |   |   |   |   |   |    |   |   |     |
| Income                before taxes                |   |   | -3,990 |   |   | 25,534  |   |   | 40,691   |   |   | 34,116 |   |
| Interest                                          |   |   | 49,254 |   |   | 45,413  |   |   | 53,185   |   |   | 73,274 |   |
| Interest                portion of rental expense |   |   | 3,254  |   |   | 3,739   |   |   | 4,960    |   |   | 7,737 |   |
|                                              |   |   | 48,518 |   |   | 74,686  |   |   | 98,836   |   |   | 115,127 |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |    |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed                Charges:                     |   |   |   |   |   |    |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |
| Interest                                          |   |   | 49,254 |   |   | 45,413  |   |   | 53,185   |   |   | 73,274 |   |
| Interest                capitalized               |   |   | -844   |   |   | -860    |   |   | -1,120   |   |   | -1,230 |   |
| Interest                portion of rental expense |   |   | 3,254  |   |   | 3,739   |   |   | 4,960    |   |   | 7,737 |   |
|                                              |   |   | 51,664 |   |   | 48,292  |   |   | 57,025   |   |   | 79,781 |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |    |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio                                             |   |   | 0.9    |   |   | 1.5     |   |   | 1.733209 |   |   | 1.443040 |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |    |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |
| Shortfall                (overage)                |   |   | 3,146  |   |   | -26,394 |   |   | -41,811  |   |   | -35,346 |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |    |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |    |   |   |     |   |   |   |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,729
<SECURITIES>                                     5,904
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                       517
<INVENTORY>                                     11,376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,865
<PP&E>                                          27,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,605
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,087
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,210
<SALES>                                         41,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,128
<CGS>                                           36,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,415
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   517
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,979)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,441)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,538)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.04)


</TABLE>
1

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3240

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Currie Moore, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. * 

___________

 Submitted: August 22, 2008

Filed: August 29, 2008 (corrected September 4, 2008)

___________

Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Currie Moore challenges the sentence the district court1

 imposed after he

pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm as a previously convicted felon, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing, the district court found that Moore

possessed the firearm in connection with another felony offense. Accordingly, the

court applied a 4-level specific offense characteristic under USSG § 2K2.1(b)(6), and

imposed a statutory maximum sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment, which is within

the advisory guideline range. Moore appealed, arguing that his Sixth Amendment
-2-

right to a jury trial was violated when the district court found, by a preponderance of

evidence, certain facts supporting the specific offense characteristic, especially

because this court may now apply an appellate presumption of reasonableness to a

sentence within the advisory guideline range.

We review the issues raised by Moore for plain error, as he did not raise them

in the district court. See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir. 2005) (en

banc). We conclude that the district court did not err in deciding the facts relevant to

sentencing or in applying a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard. See Apprendi

v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000) (other than prior conviction, any fact that

increases penalty for crime beyond statutory maximum must be submitted to jury and

proved beyond reasonable doubt); United States v. Garcia-Gonon, 433 F.3d 587, 593

(8th Cir. 2006) (under advisory Guidelines regime, sentencing judges are only

required to find sentence-enhancing facts by preponderance of evidence).

Furthermore, Moore’s apparent challenge to the appellate presumption of

reasonableness for sentences within the advisory range is foreclosed by Rita v. United

States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-68 (2007).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
# C_2009205EN.01003201.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/32

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2009 — Peugeot and Peugeot Nederland v Commission

(Case T-450/05) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Distribution of Motor vehicles - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Limitation of parallel exports from the Netherlands - System of remuneration of dealers and pressure - Agreement with an anti-competitive aim - Fines - Seriousness and length of the infringement)

2009/C 205/56

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Automobiles Peugeot SA (Paris, France) and Peugeot Nederland NV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: O. d'Ormesson and N. Zacharie, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Bouquet, F. Arbault and A. Whelan, initially, and A. Bouquet and M. Kellerbauer, subsequently, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C (2005)3683 final of 5 October 2005 relating to proceedings under Article 81 [EC] (Cases COMP/F2-36.623, COMP/F2-36.820 and COMP/F2-37.275 — SEP and Others/Automobiles Peugeot SA) and, in the alternative, an application for the reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants by the decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that the fine imposed on Automobiles Peugeot SA and Peugeot Nederland NV by Article 3 of Commission Decision C (2005) 3683 final of 5 October 2005 relating to proceedings under Article 81 [EC] (Cases COMP/F2-36.623, COMP/F2-36.820 and COMP/F2-37.275 — SEP and Others/Automobiles Peugeot SA) be fixed at EUR 44.55 million; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that the fine imposed on Automobiles Peugeot SA and Peugeot Nederland NV by Article 3 of Commission Decision C (2005) 3683 final of 5 October 2005 relating to proceedings under Article 81 [EC] (Cases COMP/F2-36.623, COMP/F2-36.820 and COMP/F2-37.275 — SEP and Others/Automobiles Peugeot SA) be fixed at EUR 44.55 million;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Automobiles Peugeot and Peugeot Nederland to bear nine-tenths of their own costs and to pay nine-tenths of the costs incurred by the Commission of the European Communities; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Automobiles Peugeot and Peugeot Nederland to bear nine-tenths of their own costs and to pay nine-tenths of the costs incurred by the Commission of the European Communities;

| 4. | Orders the Commission to bear one tenth of its own costs and to pay one tenth of the costs incurred by Automobiles Peugeot and Peugeot Nederland. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission to bear one tenth of its own costs and to pay one tenth of the costs incurred by Automobiles Peugeot and Peugeot Nederland.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.03.2006.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Manuel Castaneda MORENO.

No. 567P13-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Lauren M. Clemmons, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Manuel Castaneda Moreno, for Moreno, Manuel Castaneda.

Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th of June 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Ervin, J. recused.
Kerry Ray HARRISON, Employee, Plaintiff, v. GEMMA POWER SYSTEMS, LLC, Employer, Travelers Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants.

No. COA15-647.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-QSB
for  the  period  ended September 30, 2003,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., the Managing General Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., each certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 11, 2003



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 11, 2003
TRUHAN v. WALSTON, et al.

No. 364P14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

Ann C. Ochsner, Raleigh, for Walston, Susan P.

Bryan T. Simpson, Natalia K. Isenberg, Raleigh, for Truhan, Daniel, et al.

Timothy W. Wilson, Rocky Mount, for North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company.

M. Greg Crumpler, Rocky Mount, for United Services Automobile Association.

Thomas H. Morris, Wilson, for Walston, Susan P., et al.

Donald E. Clark, Jr., Goldsboro, for Walston, David M.

James D. Secor, III, for Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company.

Jonathan M. Smith, Goldsboro.

Donald J. Dunn, Goldsboro, for Truhan, Daniel Joseph.

Fred Baggett, for N.C. Association of Chiefs of Police.

Amy Y. Bason, General Counsel, for N.C. Association of County Commissioners.

Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney, Sharon J. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney, for New Hanover County.

Lowell L. Siler, Durham, for Durham County.

Angela I. Carmon, for City of Winston Salem.

R. Michael Cox, Pasquotank County Attorney, for Pasquotank County.

Debra Bechtel, for Catawba County.

Sam Shames, for Gaston County.

John F. Henning, Jr., Franklin, for Town of Franklin.

Wesley L. Deaton, for Lincoln County.

Huey B. Marshall, Bolivia, for Brunswick County.

Edmond W. Caldwell, Jr., Executive Vice President and General Counsel, for N.C. Sheriffs' Association.

Leon M. Killian, III, Raleigh, for Haywood County.

Chester M. Jones, Franklin, for Macon County.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of October 2014 by Town of Franklin for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."
# V WIS J^c,
To whom it may concern, 10/19/2015 Im writing this letter requesting a extension Regarding Luis Franco DOB: 06/07/1978 his deadline was today 10/19/2015. We are still in the process of paying our lawyer to have him write out the letter to go to a higher court for appeal please give us more time a extension to get everything resolved right now I am the only one working and we are giving little by little to our lawyer to proceed this case please if we can have an extension this would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for all you help. 

# n^i\ f^e/klo ou.T3-Ooqoi*-0^ attorneymichaelgross r Oh Ute*' 1HU *^M ' _. LUIS FRANCO DOB: 06/07/1978



# "IVj&- ^ t^y&t&r a 

# j^WW

# for^nW^^^1^

FILED IN RECEIVED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS ©OUHTOFCRIMINALAPPEAL! 

# OCT 23 2015 0CT 232ri Abel Acosta, Clerk
STATE v. Jamonte Dion BAKER.

No. 4P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Jamonte Dion Baker, Polkton, for Baker, Jamonte Dion.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of January 2016 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."

ERVIN, J. recused
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-1082, -1083 

FORTUNET, INC., MILLENNIUM, INC., 

and MILLENNIUM GAMES, INC., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

and 

JACK B. CORONEL, 

 Third Party Defendant-Appellee, 

v. 

PLANET BINGO, LLC, 

Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff -

Appellant, 

and 

MELANGE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

Michael D. Rounds, Watson Rounds, of Reno, Nevada, argued for plaintiffsappellees and third party defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Cassandra P. 

Joseph. 

Jeffrey Weiss, Weiss & Moy, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for defendant/third 

party plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Karen J. Sepura. 

Mark R. Fox, Fraser Trebilcock Davis & Dunlap, P.C., of Lansing, Michigan, 

argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Toni L. Harris. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Nevada 

Judge Philip M. Pro 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-1082, -1083 

FORTUNET, INC., MILLENNIUM, INC., 

and MILLENNIUM GAMES, INC., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

and 

JACK B. CORONEL, 

Third Party Defendant-Appellee, 

v. 

PLANET BINGO, LLC, 

Defendant/Third Party PlaintiffAppellant, 

and 

MELANGE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada 

In CASE NO(S). 2:04-CV-1448 and 2:04-CV-0556. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, 

Circuit Judge). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: _September 9, 2008_ / s / Jan Horbaly

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk