alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Haley, Millette∗

 and Senior Judge Coleman 

JULIO SANTOS 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION** 

v. Record No. 0597-08-3 PER CURIAM 

 SEPTEMBER 2, 2008 

FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT 

 OF SOCIAL SERVICES 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY 

William N. Alexander, II, Judge 

 (Bruce A. Flora, on brief), for appellant. Appellant submitting on 

brief. 

 (Carolyn H. Furrow; Sara A. Jamison, Guardian ad litem for the 

minor children, on brief), for appellee. Appellee and Guardian ad 

litem submitting on brief. 

 On February 7, 2008, the trial court entered orders terminating the residual parental rights of 

Julio Santos (appellant) to his sons, D.G and E.S., and daughters, E.G. and M.G., pursuant to Code 

§ 16.1-283(C)(2). Appellant noted his appeal of the decisions. In lieu of a transcript of the 

proceedings in the trial court, appellant filed a written statement of facts on April 28, 2008. 

However, the statement of facts was not made a part of the record because it was not filed within 

fifty-five days of the entry of judgment, as required by Rule 5A:8(c)(1). 

 “When the appellant fails to ensure that the record contains transcripts or a written statement 

of facts necessary to permit resolution of appellate issues, any assignments of error affected by such 

omission shall not be considered.” Rule 5A:8(b). On appeal, appellant challenges the sufficiency 

 ∗

 Justice Millette participated in the decision of this case prior to his investiture as a 

Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia. 

 ∗∗ Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

of the evidence to support the trial court’s decisions. A transcript or statement of facts is 

indispensable to the resolution of this issue on appeal. See Anderson v. Commonwealth, 13 

Va. App. 506, 508-09, 413 S.E.2d 75, 76-77 (1992); Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 96, 

99-100, 341 S.E.2d 400, 402 (1986). Therefore, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. 

 Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kirlin Holding Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Dated:   November 13, 2003                       /s/ David O. Lindner
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 David O. Lindner
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


Dated:   November 13, 2003                       /s/ Barry E. Shapiro
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Barry E. Shapiro
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009267EN.01000802.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-411/06) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 - Shipments of waste - Choice of legal basis - Articles 133 EC and 175(1) EC)

2009/C 267/14

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Valero Jordana, M. Huttunen and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: I. Anagnostopoulou and U. Rösslein, Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and K. Michoel, Agents)

Defendants:

Interveners in support of the defendants: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, A. Adam and G. Le Bras, Agents), Republic of Austria (represented by: E. Riedl, Agent), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: E. Jenkinson, E. O’Neil and S. Behzadi-Spencer, Agents, A. Dashwood, Barrister)

Interveners in support of the defendants:

)

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste (OJ 2006 L 190, p. 1) — Choice of legal basis — Act pursuing a dual purpose or having a dual component and requiring cumulative legal bases (Art. 175(1) EC and Art. 133 EC)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic, the Republic of Austria and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic, the Republic of Austria and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 02.12.2006.

1

---
# C_2008142EN.01000602.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 April 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Quelle AG v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände

(Case C-404/06) (1)

1

(Consumer protection - Directive 1999/44/EC - Sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees - Right of the seller, where goods not in conformity are replaced, to require the consumer to pay compensation for the use of those goods - No charge for the use of the goods not in conformity)

(2008/C 142/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Quelle AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 3 of Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees (OJ 1999 L 171, p. 12) — Entitlement under national law of a seller to seek compensation from consumers for the use of goods not in conformity with the sale contract during the period before their replacement

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3 of Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees is to be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which a seller who has sold consumer goods which are not in conformity may require the consumer to pay compensation for the use of those defective goods until their replacement with new goods.

---

(1)  OJ C 310, 16.12.2006.

1

---
DWC3, INC., Ryfo, LLC, Paul Miller, and Kathleen Miller, Plaintiffs, v. William G. KISSEL and Diane L. Kissel, Defendants.

No. COA15-252.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 15, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
STATE v. Alfred William RILEY, Jr.

No. 618P07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 25, 2015.

Alfred Wm. Riley, Jr., Bunn, for Riley.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

Patrick Nadolski, District Attorney, for State of NC.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of May 2015 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# C_2009282EN.01006701.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/67

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 September 2009 — D v Commission

(Case F-18/05 RENV) (1)

1

2009/C 282/128

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.6.2005, p. 25.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         242,226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,035,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                    70,316
<INVENTORY>                                    677,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,951,614
<PP&E>                                       3,340,070
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,624,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,774,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,934,043
<BONDS>                                        686,896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    496,236
<COMMON>                                        22,067
<OTHER-SE>                                     541,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,774,795
<SALES>                                      3,686,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,686,412
<CGS>                                        2,287,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,287,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,404,417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,672
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (105,318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (105,318)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (105,318)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.09) 
        



</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Warith Farad MUHAMMAD.

No. 287A15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Mark Montgomery, for Muhammad, Warith Farad.

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 11th of August 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> *432"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
EXHIBIT 32.2

      In connection with the Annual Report of BPC Holding Corporation and Berry
Plastics Corporation (the "Registrants") on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, James M. Kratochvil, the Executive Vice-
President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Registrants,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.


/s/ James M. Kratochvil
------------------------------
James M. Kratochvil
Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

Date: March 22, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DIME BANCORP INC.'S
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         295,369
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,095
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               152,063
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,992,304
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     14,826,369
<ALLOWANCE>                                    104,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,848,000
<DEPOSITS>                                  13,847,275
<SHORT-TERM>                                 5,613,794
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            366,555
<LONG-TERM>                                    705,518
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,203
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,313,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              21,848,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                919,890
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              430,555
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                32,370
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,382,815
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             559,359
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             899,753
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          483,062
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   49,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (17,794)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                381,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                198,208
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     123,174
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,460)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   121,714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.51
<LOANS-NON>                                    118,988
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                84,209
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               106,495
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   71,608
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,582
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              104,718
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           103,218
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,500


</TABLE>
STATE v. Gregory Aldon PERKINS.

No. 332PA14-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

G. Glenn Gerding, Chapel Hill, Attorney at Law, for Perkins, Gregory Aldon.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of October 2015 by Defendant to Appoint the Public Defender:

> *753"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             698
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                       433
<INVENTORY>                                     10,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,783
<PP&E>                                          11,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,810
<BONDS>                                              6
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,644
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,814
<SALES>                                         41,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,079
<CGS>                                           22,298
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   536
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (21)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (13)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (8)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (8)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                             576
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                   40,589
<ALLOWANCES>                         0
<INVENTORY>                     21,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                68,925
<PP&E>                          23,722
<DEPRECIATION>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 351,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           27,850
<BONDS>                        101,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                             8
<OTHER-SE>                      88,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   351,177
<SALES>                         39,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                39,353
<CGS>                           23,551
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   31,942
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               6,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    874
<INCOME-TAX>                       484
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                390
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                       390
<EPS-BASIC>                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0


</TABLE>
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00299-CR

ROBERT EARL SCHIELE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 411th District Court of Polk County. (Tr. Ct. No. 22467).

TO THE 411TH DISTRICT COURT OF POLK COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 19th day of February 2015, the case upon appeal to 

revise or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these 

words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed 

by the trial court on March 7, 2013. After submitting the case 

on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by 

the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment 

contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms 

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered February 19, 2015.
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

June 19, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 06-0544 IN RE PETITION OF MICHAEL P. SINKS FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE BAR OF MONTANA ORDER Michael P. Sinks has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar ofMontana. Sinks was placed on inactive status on July 12,2021,for failing to comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending March 31, 2021. Sinks has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Sinks has now completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year, in accordance with Rule 13 ofthe CLE Rules. The Petition states that Sinks is not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings and has not committed any acts or omissions sanctionable under the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofMichael P. Sinks for reinstatement to active status in the StateBarofMontana is GRANTED. Uponpaymentofany remaining dues,fees,and the state license tax to the State Bar ofMontana,Sinks shall be reinstated. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this ay ofAugust,2021. ChiefR ic el . , 

# FiLk0 AUG 1 2 2021 Bowon Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of rvIontana 08/12/2021
Case Number: PR 06-0544

# ,‘../J,.,

e;)--i Al ,.:.1L

Justices