alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEETS AND RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,893
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,229
<PP&E>                                          25,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,914
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,569
<SALES>                                         99,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,065
<CGS>                                           87,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,258
<INCOME-TAX>                                       904
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,354
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,354
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3747 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3747

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and increase the 
exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters and emergency 
                          medical responders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2013

Mr. Larson of Connecticut (for himself, Mr. Latham, Ms. Esty, Mr. King 
 of New York, Mr. Kind, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Michaud, 
Mr. Loebsack, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Moran, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. 
   Courtney, Mr. Petri, Mr. Tonko, and Mr. Schrader) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and increase the 
exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters and emergency 
                          medical responders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Volunteer Responder Incentive 
Protection Reauthorization Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. BENEFITS PROVIDED TO VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS AND EMERGENCY 
              MEDICAL RESPONDERS.

    (a) Increase in Dollar Limitation on Qualified Payments.--
Subparagraph (B) of section 139B(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``$30'' and inserting ``$50''.
    (b) Extension.--Subsection (d) of section 139B of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``beginning after December 
31, 2010.'' and inserting ``beginning--
            ``(1) after December 31, 2010, and before January 1, 2014, 
        or
            ``(2) after December 31, 2016.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Ralph M. Amato, Chief Financial Officer of BoysToys.com, Inc. (the "Small Business Issuer") do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:



(1) 	The Small Business Issuer's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Small Business Issuer.





|By:/s/ Ralph M. Amato Ralph M. Amato
Chief Financial Officer | Date:  May 12, 2006
|------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------
# C_2008209EN.01004501.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/45

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2008 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Joint Cases T-296/05 and T-408/05) (1)

1

(Social security - Applications to have medical expenses paid at 100 % - Implied and express rejections of the applications)

(2008/C 209/77)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A. Distante initially, then G. Cipressa and L. Garofalo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis Kayser and J. Currall, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Inter alia, an application for annulment of two implied decisions of the office responsible for settling claims of the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme of the European Communities refusing to pay 100 % of certain medical expenses incurred by the applicant and an application that the Commission be ordered to pay certain medical expenses for the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the applications; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the applications;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 257, 15.10.2005.

1

---
# C_2008128EN.01002806.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 March 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-469/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 128/61)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 8, 12.1.2008.

1

---
# C_2008142EN.01002104.xml

| 7.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 February 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-120/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 142/37)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 28.4.2007.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Norman Johnson OAKLEY, Jr.

No. 263P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2016

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Attorney at Law, for Oakley, Norman Johnson (Jr.)

Richard H. Bradford, Special Deputy Attorney General, Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th of July 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of September 2016."
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge 

Carmine J. Colucci & Associates 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 194Th caeo
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136796 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136796 

 COA: 278190 

Genesee CC: 06-017873-FH 

LAMAR BURTRELL WRIGHT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55203-55204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18684]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as amended by Pub. L. 104-13; 
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review; comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The proposed information collection described below will be 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, 
as amended). The Tennessee Valley Authority is soliciting public 
comments on this proposed collection as provided by 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1). 
Requests for information, including copies of the information 
collection proposed and supporting documentation, should be directed to 
the Agency Clearance Officer: Alice D. Witt, Tennessee Valley 
Authority, 1101 Market Street (EB 5B), Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-
2801; (423) 751-6832. (SC: 0001JTJ) Comments should be sent to the OMB 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk Officer 
for the Tennessee Valley Authority by October 20, 2005.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Type of Request: Regular submission; proposal for a new collection.
    Title of Information Collection: Confirmation of TVA-Owned Cash.
    Frequency of Use: One time.
    Type of Affected Public: Business.
    Small Businesses or Organizations Affected: No.
    Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 629.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 345.50.
    Estimated Average Burden Hours Per Response: 0.55 hours.
    Need For and Use of Information: We are requesting the information 
from the financial institutions located near TVA operating plants and 
offices to determine whether those financial institutions have TVA-
owned cash on deposit. We will use the information obtained to confirm 
the amount of cash

[[Page 55204]]

included in TVA's financial statement report.

Jacklyn J. Stephenson,
Senior Manager, Enterprise Operations, Information Services.
[FR Doc. 05-18684 Filed 9-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3841 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3841

   To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide that foreign 
income be considered in the determination of eligibility for grants and 
                         loans under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide that foreign 
income be considered in the determination of eligibility for grants and 
                         loans under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF FOREIGN INCOME FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING 
              TOTAL INCOME FOR HIGHER EDUCATION GRANT AND LOAN 
              ELIGIBILITY.

    Section 480(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087vv(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (H) and (I) as 
                subparagraphs (I) and (J), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the 
                following new subparagraph:
                    ``(H) foreign income excluded for purposes of 
                Federal income taxes;''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (D), by striking the semicolon 
                and inserting ``; or'';
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (E); and
                    (C) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as 
                subparagraph (E).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         167,211
<SECURITIES>                                   954,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,307,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                    73,672
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,485,764
<PP&E>                                      12,760,582
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,882,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,310,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,671,106
<BONDS>                                     12,480,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                    (86,787)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,310,362
<SALES>                                      7,357,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,501,501
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,089,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               371,378
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             959,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,323
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,529
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,794
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,794
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136537 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136537 

 COA: 277155 

Oakland CC: 2006-211073-FH 

KEITH ALLEN MANSFIELD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 3, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

DMF, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AMP PLUS, INC., dba ELCO Lighting, ELCO 

LIGHTING, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2024-1877

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in No. 2:18-cv-07090-CASGJS, Senior Judge Christina A. Snyder.

______________________

Before LOURIE, CUNNINGHAM, and STARK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ responses to the 

court’s show cause order, in which both parties agree that 

no final, appealable judgment has yet been entered in this 

case1, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed.

Case: 24-1877 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 08/30/2024
2 DMF, INC. v. AMP PLUS, INC.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

August 30, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

1 Although DMF, Inc. urges that this case be dismissed “without prejudice to DMF raising issues in the ‘Interim Judgment’ in a notice of appeal timely filed after 

entry of final judgment,” ECF No. 12 at 12, this court generally does not specify whether a dismissal of an appeal is 

with prejudice. 

Case: 24-1877 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 08/30/2024
State of North Carolina v. Robert Antwain Stanback

No. 135P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

Robert A. Stanback, Pro Per.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 14th of April 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Randolph County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of April 2016 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     COMPANY'S  INCOME  STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
     IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 639
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          4,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6,664
<PP&E>                                                 705
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       7,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,305
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            20,698
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         7,413
<SALES>                                             10,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10,901
<CGS>                                                6,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,905)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,905)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.32)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3765 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3765

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
198 Baker Street in Corning, New York, as the ``Specialist Ryan P. Jayne 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SPECIALIST RYAN P. JAYNE POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 198 Baker Street in Corning, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Specialist Ryan P. Jayne Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Ryan P. Jayne Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```