C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Manuel Nava

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00449

- CR

Trial court case number: 1919049

Trial court: Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No

. 14 of Harris County

On July 15, 2014, r elator Manuel Nava filed a “Motion for Immediate Temporary Relief from Execution of Judgment Pending Appeal” requesting that this Court enter an order (1) releasing relator from custody, (2) directing the trial cour t to rescind and withdraw relator’s bail requirement of $25,000.00 and (3) staying commencement of the terms of relator’s community supervision until the mandate from this Court has issued.

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.10(b), w e ORDER that the commencement of the terms and conditions of relator’s community supervision be stayed until
our mandate issues or until ot herwise ordered by this Court. Se e Lundgren v. State , 2014 WL 2865806, at * 4 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014) (“[I] f a defenda nt files a timely and effective notice of appeal, that filing stays the commencement of the community

- supervision term imposed until appellate mandate has issued affirming the judgment of conviction ”) ; Humphries
v. State , 261 S.W.3d 144 , 145

- 46 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2008) ( holding that trial court erred in ordering terms of community supervision to commence immediately notwithstanding timely appeal and granting emergency motion to stay commencement of terms and conditions of community supervisi on until issuance of appellate mandate); Cuellar v. State , 985 S.W.2d 656, 658 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (payment due as condition of community supervision “ was not due until the appeal was decided because when an appeal is taken from a criminal conviction assessing a probated sentence, the terms of community supervision do not commence until mandate from the appellate court, effecting final disposition of the appeal, is
issued .”)

.
W e further ORDER that the State file a response regardin g the relief sought in relator’s motion by no later than 5:00pm on July 18, 2014 and whether the State contests the release of relator pending appeal

. In addition

, we note that the State’s response to relator’s petition for writ
of mandamus was due on June 23, 2014

. Accordingly, w e further ORDER that th e State’s past

due response to the petition also be filed by no later than 5:00pm on July 18, 2014 ; in particular

, we request that the response address whether the State concurs with the representations of th erecord in the petition that relator filed a notice of appeal with the trial court clerk on May 6, 2014

( an electronic file

- marked copy of the purported notice of appeal is attached as Exhibit F to relator’s record appendix filed in conjunction with the p etition).
Relator’s request s that he be released from custody and his bail requirement rescinded are properly first raised in the trial court in a petition for writ of habeas corpus rather than the present
motion. However, this Court requests that the tria l court re consider its orders revoking relator’s community supervision and setting bail in light of our order staying commencement of the terms and conditions of relator’s community supervision

. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 16, 2014