alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         128,621
<SECURITIES>                                    32,241
<RECEIVABLES>                                  310,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,777
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               657,793
<PP&E>                                         383,733
<DEPRECIATION>                                 128,402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,170,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          330,330
<BONDS>                                        157,907
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         33
<COMMON>                                         1,057
<OTHER-SE>                                     645,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,170,108
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,221,776
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,092,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (7,988)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,567
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             85,643
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,926
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,569
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80


</TABLE>
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 11 December 2007 – Regione Siciliana v Commission**

**(Case T-156/06)**

European Social Fund (ESF) – Reduction in Community financial assistance initially granted – Action for annulment – Regional or local entity – Lack of direct effect – Inadmissibility

Actions for annulment – Natural and legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them (Art. 230, fourth para., EC) (see paras 41, 43-47, 51-54, 64, 67, 70)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2006)1171 of 23 March 2006 concerning a reduction in assistance from the European Social Fund (ESF) for an operational programme in the Region of Sicily forming part of the Community support framework for structural assistance under Objective 1 in Italy (period 1994 to 1999). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Regione Siciliana to pay the costs. |
POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints  each of Adolph J. Ferro and Gilbert N.  Miller,  signing  singly,  the
undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

         1. Execute for and on behalf of the undersigned,  in the  undersigned's
capacity  as  a  director  of  Agritope,   Inc.,  a  Delaware  Corporation  (the
"Company"),  Forms 10-K, 10-Q or 8-K, and any amendments  thereto, in accordance
with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
the rules and regulations thereunder.

         2. Do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned
which may be  necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 10-K,
10-Q or 8-K,  and any  amendments  thereto,  and  timely  file  such  forms  and
amendments  with the United States  Securities  and Exchange  Commission and the
Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. or similar authority.

         3. Take any other action of any type  whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact,  may be of benefit to,
in the best  interest  of, or legally  required  by, the  undersigned,  it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned  pursuant to this Power of Attorney  shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such  attorney-in-fact  may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

         This Power of Attorney  shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned  is no  longer  required  to sign  Forms  10-K,  10-Q and  8-K,  and
amendments  thereto,  on behalf of the Company,  unless  earlier  revoked by the
undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney
to be executed as of this 21st day of December, 1998.



                                             /S/ Roger L. Pringle
                                             -----------------------------------
STATE v. Clyde Gary WHISENANT.

No. 423P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Katherine Jane Allen, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Whisenant, Clyde Gary.

G. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Whisenant, Clyde Gary.

David Learner, District Attorney, for Whisenant, Clyde Gary.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of December 2015 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."

ERVIN, J. recused.
# C_2012006EN.01001101.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/11

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Groupe Gascogne v Commission

(Case T-72/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Plastic industrial bags sector - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Fines - Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover - Proportionality)

2012/C 6/15

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Groupe Gascogne SA (St Paul-lès-Dax, France) (represented initially by: C. Lazarus, then by P. Hubert and E. Durand, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and F. Arbault, then by F. Castillo de la Torre and N. von Lingen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags), concerning a cartel on the market for plastic industrial bags, and application for amendment of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Groupe Gascogne SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Groupe Gascogne SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trans Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John S. Tumis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ JOHN S. TUMIS      
|John S. Tumis          
|Chief Financial Officer
|September 26, 2013     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Companys Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
# C_2008209EN.01000802.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 June 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsrätten, Sweden) — Skatteverket v Gourmet Classic Ltd

(Case C-458/06) (1)

1

(Jurisdiction of the Court - Directive 92/83/EEC - Harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages - Article 20, first indent - Alcohol contained in cooking wine - Exemption from the harmonised duty)

(2008/C 209/11)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Regeringsrätten

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skatteverket

Applicant:

Defendant: Gourmet Classic Ltd

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regeringsrätten — Interpretation of the first indent of Article 20 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages (OJ 1992 L 316, p. 21) — Exemption from duty — Product based on wine, with an alcoholic content of 4.8 % per 100 kg of finished product, intended for cooking

Operative part of the judgment

The alcohol contained in cooking wine is, if it has an alcoholic strength exceeding 1.2 % by volume, to be classified as ethyl alcohol as referred to in the first indent of Article 20 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
# C_2008051EN.01003905.xml

| 23.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/39

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 December 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-245/07) (1)

1

(2008/C 51/71)

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 7.7.2007.

1

---
# C_2009153EN.01000502.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 May 2009 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht des Saarlandes — Germany) — Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes, Marion Schneider, Michael Holzapfel, Fritz Trennheuser, Deutscher Apothekerverband eV (C-171/07) and Helga Neumann-Seiwert (C-172/07) v Saarland and Ministerium für Justiz, Gesundheit und Soziales

(Joined Cases C-171/07 and C-172/07) (1)

1

(Freedom of establishment - Article 43 EC - Public health - Pharmacies - Provisions restricting the right to operate a pharmacy to pharmacists alone - Justification - Reliability and quality of the provision of medicinal products to the public - Professional independence of pharmacists)

2009/C 153/10

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht des Saarlandes

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimants: Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes, Marion Schneider, Michael Holzapfel, Fritz Trennheuser, Deutscher Apothekerverband eV (C-171/07) and Helga Neumann-Seiwert (C-172/07)

Claimants:

Defendants: Saarland and Ministerium für Justiz, Gesundheit und Soziales

Defendants:

Joined party: DocMorris NV

Joined party:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht des Saarlandes — Interpretation of Articles 10 EC, 43 EC and 48 EC — Authorisation to operate pharmacies restricted, under national legislation, to pharmacists who personally manage the pharmacy — Authorisation given by the national authorities to a legal person in view of the direct effect of Community law — Conditions under which national law should be disapplied

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 43 EC and 48 EC do not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main actions, which prevents persons not having the status of pharmacist from owning and operating pharmacies.

---

(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.

1

---
**Exhibit 99.25****CONSENT OF J. LUPO**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following report and documents,which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statementon Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission: 1. The technical report dated March 31, 2006 entitled “Technical Report NI 43-101Los Filos Project, Mexico” (the “Los Filos Report”); and  2. The annual information form of the Company dated March 25, 2008, which includesreference to my name in connection with information relating to the Los Filos Reportand the properties described therein.Date: March 25, 2008         /s/ John Lupo   Name:  John Lupo, Ph.D., P.E.   Title:  Principal, Smith Williams Consultants, Inc.(formerly with URS Australia Pty Ltd)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT KAISER PARTNER TRUST SERVICE ANSTALT,

Appellant, v. ABAY SARSEKEYEV and GREER BAY, LLC

Appellees. No. 2D23-978 November 17, 2023 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Charles P. Sniffen, Judge. Darol H.M. Carr of Farr, Farr, Emerich, Hackett, Carr and Holmes, P.A., Punta Gorda, for Appellant. John A. Anthony and Nicholas Lafalce of Anthony & Partners, LLC, Tampa, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
CHINA KINGDOM IMPORT &

EXPORT CO., LTD.; YANCHENG

YAOU SEAFOOD CO., LTD.; and

QINGDAO ZHENGRI SEAFOOD CO.,

LTD.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

Slip Op. 08-96

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge

Court No. 03-00302

JUDGMENT

The court has reviewed the Results of Redetermination on Remand Pursuant to China

Kingdom Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. United States (“Remand Redetermination”), as filed by

the International Trade Administration, United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”),

on March 4, 2008. The court concludes that the Remand Redetermination complies with the

Opinion and Order issued in this case. See China Kingdom Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. v. United

States, 31 CIT __, 507 F. Supp. 2d. 1337 (2007). 

No plaintiff submitted comments on the draft version of the Remand Redetermination

released by Commerce on February 1, 2008. Remand Redetermination 2. Pursuant to the court’s

Order of September 4, 2007, comments of plaintiffs on the Remand Redetermination were

required to be filed with the court within 30 days of the filing of the Remand Redetermination. 

No plaintiff has filed such comments. Under these circumstances, the court presumes the

concurrence of all plaintiffs with the Remand Redetermination.
Court No. 03-00302 Page 2

Upon the court’s review of the Remand Redetermination, and all relevant papers and

proceedings had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Redetermination is affirmed; and it is further

ORDERED that, in accordance with 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e), entries of merchandise that

are affected by the Remand Redetermination shall be liquidated in accordance with the final

court decision in this action.

/s/ Timothy C. Stanceu 

Timothy C. Stanceu

Judge

Dated: September 12, 2008

New York, New York
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3827 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3827

 To prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to 
       Benin until Mr. Mojaidou Soumanou is released from prison.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2014

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the United States from providing financial assistance to 
       Benin until Mr. Mojaidou Soumanou is released from prison.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO BENIN.

    The United States may not obligate or expend any direct financial 
assistance to the Government of the Republic of Benin unless--
            (1) Mr. Mojaidou Soumanou is released from prison; or
            (2) the U.S. Secretary of State determines that such 
        assistance is needed as emergency disaster relief.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2008236EN.01000401.xml

| 13.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 July 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Slovak Republic

(Case C-493/07) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/22/EC - Article 26(3) - Electronic communications - Networks and services - Single European emergency call number - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2008/C 236/06)

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Braun and J. Javorský, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Slovak Republic (represented by: J. Čorba, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take within the prescribed period the necessary measures to comply with Article 26(3) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to ensure that that undertakings which operate public telephone networks make, in so far as it is technically feasible, caller location information available to authorities handling emergencies for calls to the single European emergency call number ‘112’, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 26(3) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to ensure that that undertakings which operate public telephone networks make, in so far as it is technically feasible, caller location information available to authorities handling emergencies for calls to the single European emergency call number ‘112’, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 26(3) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive);

| 2. | Orders the Slovak Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Slovak Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 22.12.2007.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Institute of Peace

# DATE/TIME:

Thursday, September 22, 2005, 9:15 a.m.-3.45 p.m.

# LOCATION:

1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-3011.

# STATUS:

Open Session—Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection (c) of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, Public Law 98-525.

# AGENDA:

September 2005 Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes of the One Hundred Nineteenth Meeting (June 15-17, 2005) of the Board of Directors; Chairman's Report; President's Report; Committee Reports; Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007 Budget Review; Organizational Structure Review; Approval of 2005 Unsolicited and Solicited Grant; Other General Issues.

# CONTACT:

Tessie Higgs, Executive Office, Telephone: (202) 429-3836.

Dated: September 7, 2005.

Patricia P. Thomson,

Executive Vice President, United States Institute of Peace.

[FR Doc. 05-18181  Filed 9-8-05; 4:07 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M