alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18391]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee, 06-01, 
Review Ks and R03s.
    Date: October 20-21, 2005.
    Time: 8 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Soheyla Saadi, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, 45 Center Dr. Rm 4AN32A, 
National Inst of Dental & Craniofacial Research, National Institutes 
of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4805, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e5968484818c968a8da58b8c818697cb8b8c8dcb828a93"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d7e6c6c69647e62654d6364696e7f23636465236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 9, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18391 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Directors and Shareholders of
PetroFina S.A.:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of PetroFina S.A. on Form F-3 (File No. 333-49315) of our report dated March 23,
1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of PetroFina S.A. for the year
ended December 31, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of PetroFina
S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity
and cash flows for the years then ended.

/s/  MICHEL DENAYER
---------------------------------------------------------
Michel Denayer

Deloitte & Touche Reviseurs d'Entreprises scc

June 30, 2000

                                       E-3
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 28, 2009

d1021 

# Order

October 28, 2009

138353

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138353 COA: 289337 Kalamazoo CC: 08-000841-FC JOHN LEE BRINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
STATE v. Napoleon Junior RANKIN.

No. 40P15-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Napoleon J. Rankin, Lumberton, for Rankins, Napoleon Junior.

*607J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of December 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."

ERVIN, J. recused.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6869

DAVID LEE DINKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SUMTER COUNTY, c/o William Noonan; LEE COUNTY, c/o Jimmy

Mcoste; SIMON MAJOR, Jr., Director; DR. BUSH; SOUTHERN HEALTH

PARTNERS, c/o Phil Mack,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (9:07-cv-02016-HMH)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Lee Dinkins, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel

Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South

Carolina, Jerome Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX, BUYCK AND WILLIAMS,

Florence, South Carolina, Andrew S. Halio, Elliott T. Halio, HALIO

& HALIO, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Lee Dinkins appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting

summary judgment in favor of Defendants in Dinkins’ civil action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). While the magistrate judge

advised Dinkins that failure to timely file specific written

objections to the report would result in waiver of the right to

appeal from the district court’s judgment, Dinkins failed to file

any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.

Therefore, Dinkins has waived appellate review of his claims. See

United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir. 2007).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s ruling and deny

Dinkins’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES MICHAEL BECHER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 290 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of March, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>

                                  [TRANSLATION]

Bank Hapoalim
Central Management
Electronics, Chemistry, Metal and Textile Sector
"Zion House"
41-45 Rotschild Ave.
Tel Aviv

June 30, 2002
Ref: 427/95/613-202
To: Tefron Ltd.
---------------

             Re: Your Obligation Towards Us as of December 14, 1999
             ------------------------------------------------------

In respect of your obligation mentioned above, which was corrected on May 16,
2000, February 18, 2001 and November 12, 2001, we hereby notify you that we
agree to the correction of the above mentioned Obligation as set forth below:

Commencing with the financial statements as of June 30, 2002 and until the
financial statements as of June 30, 2003 (excluded), we hereby agree that your
shareholders equity will not be less than 20% of your total assets, and that the
aggregate shareholders equity will not be less than U.S. $40,000,000 (forty
million United States Dollars).

Except as provided above, the provisions of the Obligation dated as of December
14, 1999 shall apply.



Respectfully,

/s/ S. Eshkol
-------------

/s/ M. Alterman
---------------

Bank Hapoalim B.M.
Main Management
M. Alterman S. Eshkol
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

   I, M. Wayne Wisehart, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of
     Western Wireless Corporation.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     quarterly report.

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

                                          By: /s/ M. WAYNE WISEHART
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              M. Wayne Wisehart
                                              Executive Vice President and Chief
                                              Financial Officer

Dated: September 11, 2003
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136157 & (15)(16)(17)(22)(23)(25)(26) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136157 

 COA: 281986 
 Wayne CC: 03-007347-01

JERAL PEOPLES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 20, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions 

for miscellaneous relief are DENIED. 

s0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Scottish Power plc (the Company) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian Russell, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: June 29, 2005



/s/ Ian RussellIan RussellChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT (23)

# INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
CONSENT

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-77516,
33-77518 and 333-2702) pertaining to the LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. Employees
Retirement Savings Plan, the LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. Union Employees Retirement
Savings Plan and the LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. 1993 Employee Stock Incentive Plan of our
reports dated January 30, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LaCrosse
Footwear, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

| | /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
| | ---------------------------------------------------

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 19, 2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-11108

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS VILLARREAL-MORALES

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CR-29-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Luis Villarreal-Morales appeals his guilty plea conviction and

sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

He contends that his 96-month sentence violated his equal protection rights

because he did not have the benefit of a fast-track program in the Northern

District of Texas and similarly situated defendants in jurisdictions with the

program could receive lower sentences based simply on arbitrary geographic

factors. Villarreal-Morales concedes that his argument is foreclosed by circuit

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-11108

2

precedent, but he raises the argument to preserve it for further review. Based

on Villarreal-Morales’s concession, the Government moves for summary

affirmance or dismissal. In the alternative, the Government requests an

extension of time in which to file a brief on the merits.

Villarreal-Morales’s equal protection argument is foreclosed by circuit

precedent. See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 808 (5th Cir.),

petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2008) (No. 08-5514). Accordingly, the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, the Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the Government’s motions for dismissal and an

extension of time are DENIED.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              January 7, 2008



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              January 7, 2008
In the Matter of M.A.N.

No. COA15-1040.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Crystal Gail MANGUM.

No. 286P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for Mangum, Crystal Gail.

James R. Glover, Chapel Hill.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of August 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
# C_2010288EN.01003001.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EMCDDA)

(Case T-63/06) (1)

(Public service contracts - EMCDDA tender procedure - Supply of software programming and consultancy services - Rejection of a submitted tender - Award criteria - Manifest error of assessment - Equal treatment - Transparency - Principle of sound administration - Obligation to state reasons)

(2010/C 288/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (represented by: D. Storti, Agent, assisted by J. Stuyck, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction of 5 December 2005 to reject the bid submitted by the applicant in response to a call for tenders for the supply of software programming and consultancy services (OJ 2005 S 187) and to award the contract to another tenderer or, in the alternative, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA).

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006.

---
Order entered April 30 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 01158 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF A .D.B., II, A CHILD On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Da llas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 15 - 18807

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s April 27, 2020 third motion for an extension of time to file his brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to May 26, 2020 . We caution appella nt that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Larry K. Hinson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Rockport Healthcare, Group, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: June 29, 2004


/s/ Larry K. Hinson
-------------------------------
Larry K. Hinson, Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 17, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136925 & (67) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

TRACY NEAL, on behalf of herself and

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136925 

 COA: 285232 

Washtenaw CC: 96-006986-CZ 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

KENNETH MCGINNIS, JOAN YUKINS,

SALLY LANGLEY, CAROL HOWES,

ROBERT SALIS, CORNELL HOWARD,

MARTIN TATE, THOMAS PORTMAN,

WILLIAM ELLISON, CHRISTOPHER

GALLAGHER, RODERICK ROBEY, WILLIAM

OVERTON, CLARICE STOVALL, NANCY 

ZANG, JOHN ANDREWS, JAN BALDWIN, 

WES BONNEY, DAVID CRUKSHANK,

JOSEPH DURIGON, DAVID HABITZ,

EDWARD HOOK, JACK HUTCHINS,

DENNIS IFORD, DERLE JONES, 

ART LANCASTER, ERIN RICHARDSON, 

ANTHONY SIMMONS, FRED WELCH,

LYNN WILLIAMS, CHARLES WILLIAMS, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the June 10, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

TAYLOR, C.J., not participating. 

p0910 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 17, 2008 

 Clerk