alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008301EN.01001201.xml

| 22.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 September 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gießen — Germany) — Hakan Er v Wetteraukreis

(Case C-453/07) (1)

1

(EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council - Article 7, first paragraph, second indent - Right of residence of the adult child of a Turkish worker - Absence of paid employment - Conditions governing the loss of acquired rights)

(2008/C 301/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Gießen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hakan Er

Applicant:

Defendant: Wetteraukreis

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht Gießen — Interpretation of the second indent of the first paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the Development of the Association and of Article 59 of the Additional Protocol on the transitional phase laid down under the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, signed on 23 November 1970 and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 of 19 December 1972 (JO 1972 L 293, p. 1) — Right of residence of a Turkish national who entered the territory of a Member State as a minor for the purpose of family reunification — Loss of the right of residence — No lawful pursuit of an economic activity after the party in question attained majority

Operative part of the judgment

A Turkish national, who was authorised to enter the territory of a Member State as a child in the context of a family reunion, and who has acquired the right to take up freely any paid employment of his choice under the second indent of the first paragraph of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 on the Development of the Association, adopted by the Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the European Economic Community and Turkey, does not lose the right of residence in that State, which is the corollary of that right of free access, even though, at the age of 23, he has not been in paid employment since leaving school at the age of 16 and has taken part in government job-support schemes without, however, completing them.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 8.12.2007.

1

---
STATE v. Gregory Lynn GORDON.

No. 132P11-8.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Gregory Lynn Gordon, Taylorsville, for Gordon, Gregory Lynn.

Derrick Mertz, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of October 2015 by Defendant for Ex-Parte Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ. 1 and Circuit Judge Ayabe, in place of Acoba, J., recused. NO. SCWC-29994

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. TALELE MIKA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 29994; CR. NO. 08-1-0053)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., for the court ) 1 Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii’s application for writ of certiorari filed on July 12, 2011, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 24, 2011. Keith M. Kaneshiro, Prosecuting Attorney, Brian R. Vincent, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, on the application forpetitioner/plaintiffappellee. Richard D. Gronna on the response for respondent/ defendant-appellant. FOR THE COURT: /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
Chief Justice Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29994 24-AUG-2011 08:15 AM
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135102(49) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135102 

 COA: 268842 

Kalamazoo CC: 05-000086-FC 

ALEX LAVERN GOLDMAN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 11, 2008 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
# C_2023329EN.01004303.xml

| 18.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/43

---

Order of the General Court of 18 July 2023 — Court of Auditors v Allianz Insurance Luxembourg

(Case T-93/23) (1)

(2023/C 329/63)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 127, 11.4.2023.

---
# C_2009019EN.01000202.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece)) — Theologos-Grigorios Khatzithanasis v Ipourgos Igeias kai Kinonikis Allilengiis, OEEK (Organismos Epangelmatikis Ekpaidefsis kai Katartisis)

(Case C-151/07) (1)

1

(Directive 92/51/EEC - Recognition of diplomas - Studies completed in an ‘independent study centre’ not recognised as an educational establishment in the host Member State - Optician)

(2009/C 19/03)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Simvoulio tis Epikratias

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Theologos-Grigorios Khatzithanasis

Applicant:

Defendants: Ipourgos Igeias kai Kinonikis Allilengiis, OEEK (Organismos Epangelmatikis Ekpaidefsis kai Katartisis)

Defendants:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Simvoulio tis Epikratias — Interpretation of Articles 149 and 150 EC and of Council Directive 92/51/EEC of 18 June 1992 on a second general system for the recognition of professional education and training to supplement Directive 89/48/EEC (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 25) — Failure to recognise, in the host Member State, a vocational training qualification conferring a right to pursue the profession of optician in the Member State where that qualification was awarded — Training received, for the greater part, at an establishment which lawfully operates in the host Member State, but which is not recognised, under the legislation of that State, as an educational establishment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 1(a), 3 and 4 of Council Directive 92/51/EEC of 18 June 1992 on a second general system for the recognition of professional education and training to supplement Directive 89/48/EEC, as amended by Directive 2001/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2001, must be interpreted as meaning that the competent authorities of a host Member State are required, under Article 3 of that directive, subject to the application of Article 4 of that directive, to recognise a diploma awarded by a competent authority in another Member State even though that diploma attests to education and training received, in whole or in part, at an establishment located in the host Member State which, according to the legislation of that State, is not recognised as an educational establishment.

---

(1)  OJ C 117, 26.5.2007.

1

---
State of North Carolina v. Steve Morrison

No. 289P06-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Steve Morrison, Pro Per.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, For State of NC.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th of May 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, the following order was entered and is Hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of May 2016 by Defendant to Proceed in Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of May 2016 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
Nies v. Town of Emerald Isle

409PA15-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 25, 2016

J. David Breemer, Attorney at Law, Keith P. Anthony, Attorney at Law, Durham, For Nies, Gregory P., et al.

Brian E. Edes, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, Norwood P. Blanchard, III, Attorney at Law, For Town of Emerald Isle.

Elliot M. Engstrom, Attorney at Law, For Civitas Institute Center for Law and Freedom.

Stephanie H. Autry, Attorney at Law, George B. Autry, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Robert H. Thomas, Attorney at Law, Pro Hac Vice, For Owners' Counsel of America, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of May 2016 by Civitas Institute Center for Law and Freedom for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of May 2016."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor
Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Mark Garrett, the Chief
Financial Officer of Documentum, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1.      The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2
(the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
|
| | 2.     The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the
Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.                   

This certification accompanies the Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 and
shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 14th
day of November, 2002.

|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark Garrett
Mark Garrett
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Kitty Hawk, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|Date: August 13, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/  ROBERT W. ZOLLER, JR.           
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  |     |  | Robert W. Zoller, Jr.                
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                      |  |    
|Date: August 13, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/  DREW KEITH                      
|                      |  |     |  | Drew Keith                           
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer              



The foregoing
certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Titan Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     a)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

     b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company

Date June 16, 2006                       /s/ Ronald L. Wilder
                                         ----------------------------
                                         Ronald L. Wilder,  President
                                         (Chief  Executive  Officer)
                                         (Chief  Financial  Officer)
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF EDUCATORS, INC., Richard J. Nixon, Rhonda Holmes, Brian Link, Annette Beatty, Stephanie Wallace and John Deville. v. The STATE of North Carolina.

No. 228A15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State of North Carolina.

Burton Craige, Raleigh, for North Carolina Association of Educators, Inc., et al.

Narendra Ghosh, Chapel Hill, for North Carolina Association of Educators, Inc., et al.

Philip A. Hostak, for North Carolina Association of Educators, Inc., et al.

John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, for the State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 7th of July 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North *832Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Accordingly, the new brief of the Defendant shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, James R. Kupferschmid, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kitty Hawk, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     August 20, 2007 By: /s/ JAMES R. KUPFERSCHMID         James R. Kupferschmid    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 676 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 75
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 676

                          [Report No. 110-35]

     To provide that the Executive Director of the Inter-American 
   Development Bank or the Alternate Executive Director of the Inter-
 American Development Bank may serve on the Board of Directors of the 
                       Inter-American Foundation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2007

   Mr. Biden (for himself, Mr. Lugar, and Mr. Hagel) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Foreign Relations

                             March 9, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Biden, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide that the Executive Director of the Inter-American 
   Development Bank or the Alternate Executive Director of the Inter-
 American Development Bank may serve on the Board of Directors of the 
                       Inter-American Foundation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO APPOINT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR ALTERNATE 
              EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 
              TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN 
              FOUNDATION.

    The third sentence of section 401(g) of the Foreign Assistance Act 
of 1969 (22 U.S.C. 290f(g)) is amended to read as follows: ``Three 
members of the Board shall be appointed from among the following: 
officers or employees of agencies of the United States concerned with 
inter-American affairs, the United States Executive Director of the 
Inter-American Development Bank, or the Alternate Executive Director of 
the Inter-American Development Bank.''.
                                                        Calendar No. 75

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 676

                          [Report No. 110-35]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

     To provide that the Executive Director of the Inter-American 
   Development Bank or the Alternate Executive Director of the Inter-
 American Development Bank may serve on the Board of Directors of the 
                       Inter-American Foundation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 9, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```