alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004088EN.01044602.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/446 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/446

---

(2004/C 88 E/0455)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3020/03

by Anna Karamanou (PSE) to the Commission

(8 October 2003)

Subject:   Human rights in Romania — underage marriages in the gypsy community

Subject:

The shocking case of Ana-Maria Cioaba, a 12-year-old gypsy girl regarded as a princess by the Roma community in Romania, who was forced into a marriage which she desperately opposed, has spotlighted the serious violations of fundamental human rights in an applicant country due to join the European Union in 2007.

Adherence by the gypsy community to its traditions in cases such as this constitutes flagrant violation of the human rights of children belonging to the gypsy community who are not asked whether and whom they wish to marry but are compelled by force to comply with the choice of their male relatives. This is tolerated if not actually covered up by the Government, which chooses not to implement its own laws, particularly regarding the Roma. For example, the legal age for marriage in Romania is 18 while, under certain conditions, it may be allowed at the age of 16. Concerning the Roma community, however, the authorities tend to turn a blind eye, allowing the practice of forced marriages such as that referred to above to be perpetuated.

What measures will the Commission take and what representations will it make to the Romanian Government with a view to protecting the human rights of underage members of the gypsy community given that Romania's application for European Union membership must denote a significant step forward by the country regarding the protection of human rights?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(24 October 2003)

(24 October 2003)

The Commission is aware of the traditional Roma wedding of two minors that recently took place in Romania. This wedding does not have legal force because the two minors have not reached the legal age for marriage under Romanian law.

The Commission can inform the Honourable Member that the Child Protection Department of the province where the traditional wedding took place reached an agreement with the parents concerned. As a result both children have returned to their parents' homes, they will go to school and will attend counselling sessions at the Child Protection Service until they reach the legal age of marriage.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7080

MICHAEL MCNEILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER JORDAN; ERICA DRATWA; SERGEANT ADAMS; SERGEANT SPATES;

CAPTAIN MEEKS; LIEUTENANT GAWONIAWITCH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (5:08-ct-03040-FL)

Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v.

Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03040-FL (E.D.N.C. June 17, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 4.3


 


NOTATION OF GUARANTEE


 


For value received, each Guarantor (which
term includes any successor to such Guarantor under the Indenture referred to below) has, jointly and severally, fully and unconditionally
guaranteed, to the extent set forth in the Indenture and subject to the provisions in the Indenture dated as of July 2, 2014 (the
“Indenture”) among SAExploration Holdings, Inc., (the “Company”), the Guarantors party thereto
and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), and the Noteholder Collateral Agent (a) the
due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and overdue interest on, the Notes, whether at maturity, by acceleration,
redemption or otherwise, the due and punctual payment of interest, to the extent permitted by applicable law, on overdue principal
of and interest on the Notes, if any, and the due and punctual performance of all other obligations of the Company to the Holders
or the Trustee all in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and (b) in case of any extension of time of payment or renewal
of any Notes or any of such other obligations, that the same will be promptly paid in full when due or performed in accordance
with the terms of the extension or renewal, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise. The obligations of the Guarantors
to the Holders of Notes and to the Trustee pursuant to the Note Guarantee and the Indenture, and the limitations thereon, are expressly
set forth in Article 11 of the Indenture and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for the precise terms of the Note Guarantee.


 


This Note Guarantee shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the internal law of the State of New York.


 


Capitalized terms used but not defined
herein have the meanings given to them in the Indenture.


 


 


 


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 






    	 



    	 



    

 





	 	saexploration Holdings, Inc., as Issuer
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Brent
Whiteley
	 	 	Name: Brent Whiteley
	 	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	saexploration sub, inc., as a Guarantor
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Brent
Whiteley
	 	 	Name: Brent Whiteley
	 	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	SAEXPLORATION, INC., as a Guarantor
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Brent
Whiteley
	 	 	Name: Brent Whiteley
	 	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	SAEXPLORATION SEISMIC SERVICES (US), LLC, as a Guarantor
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Brent
Whiteley
	 	 	Name: Brent Whiteley
	 	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	NES, LLC, as a Guarantor
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Brent
Whiteley
	 	 	Name: Brent Whiteley
	 	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary



 


 





[Notation of Guarantee]
Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136849 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. In re AYDEN ROOD, Minor. Stephen J. Markman, _________________________________________/ Justices 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v SC: 136849 

 COA: 280597 

Mason CC Family Division: 

DARROLL DONALD ROOD, 06-000019-NA 

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the Department of Human Services 

made adequate efforts to contact the respondent-appellee father, who had given contact 

information to the court at the June 8, 2006 hearing concerning the rights of the child’s 

natural mother; (2) whether the Department of Human Services was under a legal duty, 

imposed by statute or court rule, to conduct a home study or to make other efforts to 

place the minor child with the respondent father, given the unique circumstances of this 

case; (3) whether the existence of any legal duty was mitigated by the respondent father’s 

failure to contact the agency for over one year, failure to pursue visitation with his child 

who had been placed in foster care, or his domestic violence convictions involving the 

child’s mother; and (4) whether the failure of the family court to send notices of the 

proceedings to the correct address, or the failure of the Department of Human Services to 

make diligent effort to contact the respondent father at the address and telephone number 

provided by him at the June 8, 2006 adjudication hearing for the respondent mother, 

precluded the court from terminating respondent father’s parental rights. 

We further ORDER the Mason Circuit Court Family Division, utilizing a 

procedure analogous to that described in Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine no 

later than August 12, 2008, whether the respondent-appellee is indigent and, if so, to 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

appoint attorney Jeffrey C. Nellis, if feasible, to represent the respondent in this Court. If 

the respondent is not indigent, he must retain his own counsel. 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the October 2008 session 

calendar for argument and submission. Petitioner-appellant’s brief and appendix must be 

filed no later than August 25, 2008, and respondent-appellee’s brief and appendix, if 

appellee chooses to submit an appendix, must be filed no later than September 15, 2008. 

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this 

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no later 

than September 24, 2008. 

d0729 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-QSB
for  the  period  ended March 31, 2003,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc.,  the  Managing General Partner  of  the  Partnership,
certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                           /s/ Robert P Johnson
                               Robert P. Johnson, President
                               AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                               Managing General Partner
                               May 12, 2003
# CE2004088EN.01060002.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/600 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/600

---

(2004/C 88 E/0614)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0892/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(21 March 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Fiumicino

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Fiumicino, urgently need to use European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions, nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and culture, can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Fiumicino has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Fiumicino has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Fiumicino has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Fiumicino has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          31,245
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                       670
<INVENTORY>                                      6,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,896
<PP&E>                                         190,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,724
<BONDS>                                        110,191
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     21,400
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,195
<SALES>                                         41,242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,242
<CGS>                                           16,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,660
<INCOME-TAX>                                       517
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,698
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    495
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,203
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, David C. Mahoney, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Applix, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) [Not applicable.]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                               /s/ David C. Mahoney   Date: November 14, 2006 David C. Mahoney   President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2008209EN.01003702.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/37

---

Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 11 April 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Eivind F. Kramme v SAS Scandinavian Airlines Danmark A/S

(Case C-396/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 209/58)

Language of the case: Denmark

Language of the case: Denmark

The President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 2.12.2006.

1

---
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


                REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Stockholders of
Homeside Lending, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion about HOMESIDE LENDING,  INC. (a Florida
corporation)  AND  SUBSIDIARIES'  compliance with  the  minimum   servicing
standards identified Mortgage Bankers Association of AMERICA'S UNIFORM
SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS (USAP) and that the Company
had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount
of $76 million and $20 million, respectively,  as of February 10, 1998 and for
the period from March 1, 1997 to February 10, 1998, included in the accompanying
management  assertion  letter.  Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum servicing standards and for maintaining a fidelity
bond and errors and  omissions  policy.  Our  responsibility is to  express  an
opinion on  management's  assertion based on our  examination.

Our examination was made in accordance  with standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining, on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and  performing  such other procedures  as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination on the Company's  compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In  our  opinion,   management's  assertion  that  Homeside  Lending,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries  complied with the aforementioned  minimum servicing  standards and
that Company had in effect a fidelity  bond and errors and  omissions  policy in
the amount of $76 million and $20  million,  respectively,  as of February  10,
1998 and for the  period  from  March 1,  1997 to  February  10,  1998 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/Arthur Anderson LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
April 15, 1995
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1117

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN GAGE, President, American Federation of Government

Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 1923; JOE FLYNN, Vice President,

AFGE Local 1923, AFL-CIO; ANN ROBINSON, Vice President, AFGE

1923 Local, AFL-CIO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.

(1:97-cv-02354-FNS)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Francis Joseph

Collins, KAHN, SMITH & COLLINS, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark D.

Roth, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO,

Washington, DC, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district

court’s orders denying his motion to reopen a civil action and

denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Gage, No.

1:97-cv-02354-FNS (D. Md. Dec. 5, 2007; Dec. 17, 2007). Wilder’s

motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
STATE of North Carolina v. Jermaine Antoine CADE.

No. 104P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

Laura Edwards Parker, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Jermaine A. Cade, for Cade, Jermaine Antoine.

Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of April 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."
STATE v. Tracy Lamont CLARK.

No. 13P11-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

*207Tracy Lamont Clark, for Clark, Tracy Lamont.

Philip E. Berger, Jr., District Attorney, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of May 2015 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."