alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                     <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,564                   2,564
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,351                  30,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,082,650               1,082,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                 224,208                 224,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,010,426               1,010,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                        500,952                 500,952
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,010,426               1,010,426
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,270                 150,893
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,085                  88,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,426                  26,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,759                  35,673
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,759                  35,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,759                  35,673
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32                     .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32                     .97


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Berry Plastics Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James M. Kratochvil, the Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








/s/ James M. Kratochvil


James M. Kratochvil


Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial


Officer, Treasurer and Secretary





Date:     December 17, 2010
**Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 30 March 2007 – Makhteshim-Agan Holding and Others v Commission**

**(Cases T-393/06 R I, T-393/06 R II and T-393/06 R III)**

Applications for interim measures – Applications for interim measures and for suspension of operation – Directive 91/414/EEC – Inadmissibility

1.                     *Applications for interim measures – Conditions of admissibility – Admissibility of main application – Irrelevance – Limits
(Art. 242 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(1); Council Directive 91/414, Art. 8(2)) (see paras
39-49)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to act – Formal notice to the institution (Art. 232 EC) (see paras 53-59)*

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| APPLICATIONS for suspension of operation of a decision alleged to be contained in a letter from the Commission dated 12 October 2006 concerning the evaluation of the active substance azinphos-methyl, in accordance with Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ 1991 L 230, p. 1), and for other interim measures. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Cases T‐393/06 R I, T‐393/06 R II and T‐393/06 R III are joined for the purposes of the present order. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | The applications for interim measures are dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Costs are reserved. |
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000025 26-JAN-2017 10:49 AM SCWC-12-0000025 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I GORAN PLEHO, LLC, a Hawai ' i Limited Liability Company (dba Resorts Limousine Services), GORAN PLEHO and ANA MARIA PLEHO, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

vs. DAVID W. LACY, LACY AND JACKSON, LLLC, a Hawai ' i Limited Liability Law Company, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and DRAGAN RNIC, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000025; CIV. NO. 06-1-101K) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees Goran Pleho, LLC, Goran Pleho, and Ana Maria Pleho’s application for writ of certiorari filed on December 12, 2016, is hereby accepted, and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, January 26, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# Federal Register Citations of Previous Announcement: 

70 FR 54381, September 14, 2005.

# Previously Announced Time and Date of Meeting: 

2 p.m. (Eastern Time) Wednesday, September 21, 2005.

# Change in the Meeting: 

The meeting has been cancelled.

# For Further Information Contact: 

Stephen Llewellyn, Acting Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

Dated: September 14, 2005.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Acting Executive Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-18691  Filed 9-15-05; 12:22 pm]

BILLING CODE 6750-06-M
STATE of North Carolina v. John Lee STYERS, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA15-1345.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed in part, vacated in part reversed and remanded in part.
State v. Bobby Frederick Walls, Jr.

120P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

*18Justin M. Hampton, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

Bobby Frederick Walls, Jr., For Walls, Bobby Frederick.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of April 2016 by Defendant-Appellant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ohio State Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Todd M. Wanner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Todd M. Wanner

Todd M. Wanner, CPA
Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2005
# CE2004084EN.01050101.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/501 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/501

---

(2004/C 84 E/0578)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3109/03

by Phillip Whitehead (PSE) to the Commission

(17 October 2003)

Subject:   Hydrogenated fats

Subject:

In view of reservations expressed regarding the safety of hydrogenated fats, is the Commission prepared to launch an initiative which would see the potential health risk of hydrogenated fats being clearly indicated on product labelling? Furthermore, has any consideration been given to the outright ban of this substance?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(14 November 2003)

(14 November 2003)

Hydrogenation enables vegetable and animal oils to be transformed into solid fat, also making it saturated. The result of the hydrogenation process, together with other practices such as the de-odorisation process of oils and fats, is a change in the shape of fat molecules. Therefore, the natural configuration of the fatty acids molecules, known as cis configuration, very often changes into a different one, known as trans configuration. The above practices, which are used for many product applications, may lead to unacceptable amounts of trans fatty acids.

It is known that high intakes of certain saturated fatty acids are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease. Recently, reservations have also been expressed regarding trans fatty acids in the diet. Consequently, the Commission has asked the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to evaluate the evidence on the effect on health of trans fatty acids and how the effect, if any, compares to the effect on health of other types of fatty acids in the diet. The EFSA has been asked to provide a scientific opinion by the end of May 2004.

Regarding the labelling of foods, Directive 2000/13/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs (1) indicates that when a food contains hydrogenated oils or fats the description ‘hydrogenated’ must accompany the indication of a hydrogenated oil or fat in the labelling of the food. Council Directive 90/496/EC of 24 September 1990 on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs (2) includes the possibility for the declaration of the saturated fatty acids in the nutrition labelling. The question of the inclusion or not of trans fatty acids in the nutrition labelling on foods is being considered within the context of an ongoing review of Directive 90/49 6/EC.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 109, 6.5.2000.

1

(2)  OJ L 276, 6.10.1990.

2

---
# CE2004070EN.01013601.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/136 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/136

---

(2004/C 70 E/139)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2757/03

by Marco Cappato (NI) to the Council

(10 September 2003)

Subject:   Nuclear crisis in North Korea

Subject:

With a view to resolving the nuclear crisis in North Korea, negotiations attended by representatives of North and South Korea, China, Japan, Russia and the USA have recently been held in Beijing.

As is stated in the most recent Commission report on the Humanitarian Aid Office (1), the EU is the main donor of humanitarian aid to North Korea, to which country it allocates much of the humanitarian aid which it assigns to Asia.

1

In the conclusions issued at the recent Thessaloniki Summit the European Council Presidency emphasised its ‘readiness to contribute to a multilateral diplomatic solution to the crisis’.

Can the Council explain why the European Union was not represented at the Beijing negotiations?

What action does the Council intend to take in order to ensure that EU representatives are involved in future political and diplomatic negotiations on the delicate issue of nuclear disarmament in North Korea?

Reply

(8 December 2003)

(8 December 2003)

The EU strongly supports the diplomatic efforts undertaken by the six parties to achieve a solution to the North Korean proliferation issue. The EU hopes that the process will soon lead to concrete steps to lower tension in the region, including progress towards denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula, a matter of fundamental interest to the whole international community.

The EU remains willing to contribute to international efforts to move matters forward, and acts in close consultation with the main players. It is considering how it could give support to the multilateral talks in due course and in co-ordination with the capitals of the six countries involved.

---

(1)  COM(2003) 430.

1

---
State v. Avenger Ridgeway

375P09-6

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Mr. Avenger Ridgeway, Pro se.

Ms. Anne M. Middleton, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mr. Jon David, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of May 2016 by Defendant for Request to Order Public Records:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      14,297,733
<SECURITIES>                                15,966,412
<RECEIVABLES>                               70,875,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 63,650,712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           208,777,316
<PP&E>                                     688,304,562
<DEPRECIATION>                            (52,265,560)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             860,208,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      146,654,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       169,169
<OTHER-SE>                                 179,824,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               860,208,954
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           303,147,313
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              259,314,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               582,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          19,301,516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,391,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,756,305
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,635,309
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
Robert Lewis Conyers, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

June 16, 2016

ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on June 13, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S.C. 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable Robin B. Stilwell be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge Stilwell shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge Stilwell shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy RICHARDSON.

No. 232A95-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Howard A. Kurtz, Raleigh.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, for State of NC.

Kenneth J. Rose, Durham, for Richardson, Timothy.

Thomas J. Moore, II, Smithfield, for Richardson, Timothy.

Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th of November 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Nash County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
STATE of North Carolina v. Rahkid Diajhon BYRD, Defendant.

No. COA15-478.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 7, 2016.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Error.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SMC CORPORATION                                                       EXHIBIT 11
STATEMENT OF CALCULATION OF AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

                                                                          Three Months         Six Months
                                                                              Ended              Ended
                                                                          June 30, 1997      June 30, 1997
                                                                          -------------      -------------
<S>                                                                           <C>                <C>      
Primary Earnings Per Share:
         Weighted average number of shares                                    6,563,064          6,563,064
         Stock option plan shares to be issued at
         prices ranging from $7.25 to $11.50 per share                          890,000            890,000
         Warrant issues at a price of $9.30 per share                           125,000            125,000
         Less:  Assumed purchase of shares by the Company
                at the average market price during the period
                using the proceeds received upon the assumed
                exercise of the outstanding options and warrants.            (1,014,745)        (1,014,391)
                                                                             ----------         ----------
                Total Primary Shares                                          6,563,319          6,563,673
                                                                             ==========         ==========


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:
         Weighted average number of shares                                    6,563,064          6,563,064
         Stock option plan shares to be issued at prices
         ranging from $7.25 to $11.50 per share                                 890,000            890,000
         Warrant issues at a price of $9.30 per share                           125,000            125,000
         Less:    Assumed purchase of shares by the Company at
                  the higher of ending or average market price
                  during the period using the proceeds received
                  upon the assumed exercise of the outstanding
                  options and warrants                                       (1,014,745)        (1,000,793)
                                                                             ----------         ----------
                  Total Diluted Shares (1)                                    6,563,319          6,577,271
                                                                             ==========         ==========

(1)  Fully diluted EPS was not presented as its effect was less than 3% of
     primary earnings per share.
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of  AEI  Income  &
Growth  Fund XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership")  on
Form  10-QSB  for the period ended June 30, 2002,  as  filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission  on  the  date
hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Robert P. Johnson, President  of
AEI  Fund Management XXI, Inc., the Managing General Partner
of  the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained in the  Report  fairly
          presents,  in all material respects, the financial
          condition  and  results  of  operations   of   the
          Partnership.


                              /s/ Robert P Johnson
                                  Robert P. Johnson
                                  President of
                                  AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.,
                                  the Managing General Partner
                                  August 6, 2002