alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

American Systems Corporation 

Under Contract No. N62583-08-D-0136 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60275 

Joseph G. Billings, Esq. 

Katherine B. Hill, Esq. 

Miles & Stockbridge P.C. 

Baltimore, MD 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Stephen L. Bacon, Esq. 

Robyn L. Hamady, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 14 July 2016 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60275, Appeal of American Systems 

Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136314 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136314 

 COA: 283318 

Wayne CC: 99-008384

RICHARD A. ROBERTSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

s0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 99.24
 CONSENT OF D. CRICK
   1.
    
    The technical report dated November 17, 2006, entitled The Red Lake
Gold Mines Property, Red Lake Mining Division, Northern Ontario (the
Red Lake Report); and2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection
with information relating to the Red Lake Report and the Red Lake Gold
Mines, and the properties described therein.
  /s/ Dean CrickName:
    Dean Crick, M. Sc., P. Geo.
# C_2008022EN.01001901.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/19

---

Order of the Court of 8 November 2007 — Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-242/07 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Time for appealing - Article 43(6) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance - Original of the application lodged out of time - Inadmissibility - Concept of ‘excusable error’ - Concept of ‘unforeseeable circumstances’)

(2008/C 22/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: L. Van den Broeck, Agent, J.-P. Buyle and C. Steyaert, avocats)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Flynn and A. Steiblytė, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 15 March 2007 in Case T-5/07 Belgium v Commission, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible, because it was brought out of time, the appellant's action for annulment of the Commission's decision of 18 October 2006 refusing to reimburse it for a principal sum and interest paid by it in respect of debts to the European Social Fund — Time-limits for commencing proceedings and time-limits for lodging an original when a copy has earlier been sent by fax — Concepts of unforeseeable circumstances and excusable error

Belgium

Commission

Operative part of the order

The Court orders:

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | The Kingdom of Belgium is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Kingdom of Belgium is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 170, 21.7.2007.

1

---
# C_2009055EN.01005003.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/50

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 December 2008 — Fédération nationale du Crédit agricole v Commission

(Case T-98/06) (1)

1

(2009/C 55/91)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 131, 3.6.2006.

1

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50345

Conference Calendar

 

DALE ST. JOHN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-96-CV-31

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dale St. John, #653767, appeals the dismissal of his civil

rights suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). He contends that

the defendants violated his constitutional rights by transferring

him to Lockhart Work Facility. We have reviewed the record and

brief and conclude that St. John has identified no error in the

dismissal. See St. John v. Scott, No. A-96-CA-031 JN (W.D. Tex.

Apr. 10, 1996).
No. 96-50345

- 2 -

St. John’s appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. Howard v.

King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); see 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

We caution St. John that any additional frivolous appeals filed

by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, St. John is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Verticalnet, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-3 (No. 333-30254, No. 333-30408, No. 333-34860, No. 333-109897, No. 333-112498, No. 333-119103, and No. 333-121501), in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-38170), and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-34222, No.333-46016, No. 333-72143, No. 333-76326, No. 333-89305, and No. 333-112705) of Verticalnet, Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2005, except as to Note 2 , which is as of March 29, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofVerticalnet, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, shareholders’ equity (deficit), and comprehensive loss for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Verticalnet, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, as of January 1, 2002. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 29, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     881
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              381
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         1,262
<PP&E>                                                     854
<DEPRECIATION>                                             271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           2,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,180
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                   500
<OTHER-SE>                                                 303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             2,052
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         4,040
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            3,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            178
<INCOME-TAX>                                                72
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        106
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                               106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .02
        

</TABLE>
Opinion filed May 23, 2019

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-19-00148-CV

___________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.M.C., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 29th District Court

Palo Pinto County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C48197

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed in this court a motion to withdraw his notice of appeal. In 

the motion, Appellant requests that his notice of appeal be withdrawn immediately, 

and he asks this court to dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

May 23, 2019 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

 

1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
November 22, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TINA CHRISTINE MELVIN, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00939-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on September 8, 2011. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its 

opinion, that the appellant pay all costs expended in this appeal, and that this decision be 

certified below for observance.
# CE2004084EN.01002001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/20

---

(2004/C 84 E/0022)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2419/03

by Lucio Manisco (GUE/NGL) to the Council

(21 July 2003)

Subject:   Al Sahri deported by Italy and executed in Syria

Subject:

On 23 November 2002 Mohamad Al Sahri, sentenced to death by the Syrian judiciary and in exile since 1983, arrived at the Milan airport of Malpensa and five days later the new Bossi-Fini law was carried out and he was deported to Syria against his will. On 9 July 2003 Christopher Hein, chairman of the Italian council for refugees, announced that Mr Al Shari had been executed in Syria on 28 February 2003. Defying credibility, Italian immigration authorities have stated that Mr Al Sahri, asked to choose between Jordan and Syria for his deportation, indicated his preference for the latter where he had been sentenced to death.

Does the Council believe that the Italian government violated in this case not only its own national Constitution, but Article 19 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the spirit and the letter of all the directives followed by the EU on political asylum and against deporting foreign citizens to countries where they might be put to death?

What measures does the Council intend to take against the Italian authorities for such a blatant violation of human rights and of the most basic legal and humanitarian principles of the European Union?

Reply

(8 March 2004)

(8 March 2004)

The Honourable Member is referred to the joint reply given by the Council to Questions P-3822/02 and E-3843/02. Furthermore, the Council would remind the Honourable Member that it cannot intervene in actual asylum application cases in the Member States.

The Council can, however, inform the Honourable Member that in the light of the latest information available to it, Mr Al Sahri was released conditionally on 13 October this year.

---
ex10-14.htm


 


Exhibit 10.14







 


NOTICE OF CONVERSION












Global Clean Energy, Inc:












The undersigned hereby elects to surrender and convert a certain past due promissory note dated May 15, 2009 and November 4, 2009 due by Global Clean Energy, Inc, (the“Company”) in favor Sylvain McMahon for a total of $50,000.00, which was thereafter assigned to 7068778 Canada Inc, into shares of common stock of the Company (the “Common Shares”) according to the conditions hereof, as of the date written below.







Conversion Calculations:







Date of Conversion: March 4th 2013







Amount of Conversion: $50,000.00


Number of Common Shares to be issued: 4,545,455







Amount remaining on note following this conversion: $0.00






















7068778 Canada Inc


By:







(s) Jamie Ross







Name: Jamie Ross


Title: President
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3784 

To repeal the Affordable Care Act unless the initial enrollment target for 

Exchanges has been met, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2013 

Mr. YOHO (for himself, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of 

Georgia, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. HALL, Mr. GRAVES of 

Georgia, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. SALMON, Mr. 

BRIDENSTINE, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. POSEY, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 

PITTENGER, Mr. JONES, Mr. MESSER, and Mr. HULTGREN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Education and the Workforce, the Judiciary, Natural Resources, House Administration, Rules, and Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the Affordable Care Act unless the initial enrollment target for Exchanges has been met, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3784 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nullifying Unconstitu3 tional Mandate By Evaluating Results Act’’ or the ‘‘NUM4 BER Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEALING ACA UNLESS THE INITIAL ENROLL6 MENT TARGET FOR EXCHANGES HAS BEEN 

7 MET. 

8 (a) CERTIFICATION WITH REGARD TO ACA ENROLL9 MENTS.—Not later than June 1, 2014, the Comptroller 

10 General of the United States shall certify to Congress 

11 whether the initial enrollment target for Exchanges speci12 fied in subsection (c) has been met during the enrollment 

13 period ending on March 31, 2014. 

14 (b) REPEAL IF TARGET NOT MET.—Effective June 

15 1, 2014, unless the Comptroller General has certified to 

16 Congress under subsection (a) on or before such date that 

17 such initial enrollment target has been met during such 

18 period, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

19 (Public Law 111–148), title I and subtitle B of title II 

20 of the Health and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 

21 (Public Law 111–152), are repealed and the provisions of 

22 law amended by Act, title, and subtitle are restored as if 

23 such Act, title, and subtitle had not been enacted. 

24 (c) INITIAL ENROLLMENT TARGET.—The initial en25 rollment target specified in this subsection is that at least 

26 7,000,000 individuals have been successfully enrolled in 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3784 IH

1 qualified health plans through an Exchange under the Pa2 tient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE TRANS ENERGY, INC. FINANCIAL
               STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
               AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
               SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              337,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                 9,700
<INVENTORY>                                 15,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           343,968
<PP&E>                                   6,642,865
<DEPRECIATION>                           1,458,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           6,660,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    1,206,190
<BONDS>                                  2,898,508
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     3,174
<OTHER-SE>                               5,629,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             6,660,891
<SALES>                                  2,828,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,828,162
<CGS>                                    2,392,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,392,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         2,284,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            44,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         347,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (2,249,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                           (2,249,465)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.72)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2008183EN.01000401.xml

| 19.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 June 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

(Case C-170/07) (1)

1

(Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations - Internal taxation - Requirement for imported second-hand vehicles to undergo a roadworthiness test - Articles 28 EC and 30 EC - Directive 96/96/EC - Recognition of roadworthiness tests carried out in other Member States)

(2008/C 183/06)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Hottiaux and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: E. Osniecka-Tamecka, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Article 28 EC — National legislation requiring imported second-hand vehicles to undergo a roadworthiness test prior to their registration, whereas domestic vehicles with the same characteristics are not subject to such a requirement

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by subjecting imported second-hand vehicles registered in other Member States to a roadworthiness test prior to their registration in Poland, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by subjecting imported second-hand vehicles registered in other Member States to a roadworthiness test prior to their registration in Poland, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 183, 4.8.2007.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5170-5175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1855]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates

AGENCY: DoD, Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee.

ACTION: Notice of revised non-foreign overseas per diem rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is 
publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 237. This 
bulletin lists revisions in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. 
Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto 
Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United 
States. AEA changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. 
Bulletin Number 237 is being published in the Federal Register to 
assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 2005.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document gives notice of revisions in 
per diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Transportation 
Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental 
United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin 
Number 236. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by 
mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the 
Federal Register now constitute the only notification of revisions of 
per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of 
Defense. For more information or questions about per diem rates, please 
contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows:

    Dated: January 26, 2005.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 5171]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01FE05.011


[[Page 5172]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01FE05.012


[[Page 5173]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01FE05.013


[[Page 5174]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01FE05.014


[[Page 5175]]


[FR Doc. 05-1855 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C