alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008209EN.01000302.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 June 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-39/06) (1)

1

(Failure to fulfil obligations - State aid - Subsidies for investment and employment - Obligation to recover - Non-compliance - Principle of protection of legitimate expectations)

(2008/C 209/04)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Gross and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and C. Schulze-Bahr, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 249 EC and Articles 1, 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 2003/643/EC of 13 May 2003 on the State aid implemented by Germany for Kahla Porzellan GmbH and Kahla/Thüringen Porzellan GmbH (notified under document number C(2003) 1520; Aid No C-62/00, ex NN 142/99) (OJ 2003 L 227, p. 12) — Failure to take, within the prescribed time-limit, the measures necessary to recover aid which was declared incompatible with the common market

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, in failing to take all the measures necessary to recover certain aid declared incompatible with the common market by Article 1(2)(d) and (g) of the Commission Decision of 30 October 2002, as it appears in Decision 2003/643/EC of 13 May 2003 on the State aid implemented by Germany for Kahla Porzellan GmbH and Kahla/Thüringen Porzellan GmbH, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1 to 3 of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, in failing to take all the measures necessary to recover certain aid declared incompatible with the common market by Article 1(2)(d) and (g) of the Commission Decision of 30 October 2002, as it appears in Decision 2003/643/EC of 13 May 2003 on the State aid implemented by Germany for Kahla Porzellan GmbH and Kahla/Thüringen Porzellan GmbH, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1 to 3 of that decision;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.

1

---
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 13(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


         I, Arvin Scott, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
         Act of 2002, that:


         To the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form
         10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14,
         2002 by Universal Automotive Industries, Inc. and to which this
         certification is appended (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with
         the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
         1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of Universal Automotive Industries, Inc.


                                                              /s/Arvin Scott
# CE2004088EN.01012101.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/121 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/121

---

(2004/C 88 E/0128)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2922/03

by Claude Moraes (PSE) to the Commission

(2 October 2003)

Subject:   Commercial sanctions against Burma

Subject:

Following the arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi and some of her supporters earlier this year, the Burmese people have witnessed a vicious crackdown on its democratic movement. This has come at the hands of the Burmese military junta who continue to openly beat and kill democracy activists and supporters despite the EU's intervention in demanding the release of Aung San Suu Kyi. Military leaders are also reported to be frequently entering the EU disregarding visa sanctions imposed by the EU.

Given the Junta's continuing indifference to EU sanctions, does the Commission agree that the current EU sanctions policy towards Burma does not effectively send the message to the military leaders that such persecution will not be tolerated in a civilised world and that the imposition of commercial sanctions, as the US has done for the past five years, deserves further consideration? If not, why not?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(27 October 2003)

(27 October 2003)

The Commission has on several occasions voiced its grave concern for the human rights situation in Burma and the continuing harassment of democratic forces in the country.

In response to the deteriorating political situation in Burma, the Union decided to reinforce its Common Position on Burma in April 2003 (1). Furthermore, it decided to bring forward the implementation of the additional sanctions targeted at the military leaders and their closest supporters after the attacks on Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and her supporters at the end of May 2003.

1

The Commission is currently undertaking a study assessing the impact of the present Union sanctions on the Burmese regime and looking at possibilities for additional measures should the situation not improve. When examining the scope for strengthened sanctions by the Union, the Commission will look carefully at the possible effects of specific sanctions, such as economic sanctions as imposed by the United States, on the Burmese population. Any decision on further sanctions will be taken by the Council, based on the support of all Member States and the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ L 106, 29.4.2003.

1

---
TRUHAN v. WALSTON, et al.

No. 364P14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

Ann C. Ochsner, Raleigh, for Walston, Susan P.

Bryan T. Simpson, Natalia K. Isenberg, Raleigh, for Truhan, Daniel, et al.

Timothy W. Wilson, Rocky Mount, for North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company.

M. Greg Crumpler, Rocky Mount, for United Services Automobile Association.

Thomas H. Morris, Wilson, for Walston, Susan P., et al.

Donald E. Clark, Jr., Goldsboro, for Walston, David M.

James D. Secor, III, for Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company.

Jonathan M. Smith, Goldsboro.

Donald J. Dunn, for Truhan, Daniel Joseph.

Fred Baggett, for N.C. Association of Chiefs of Police.

Amy Y. Bason, General Counsel, for N.C. Association of County Commissioners.

Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney, Sharon J. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney, for New Hanover County.

Lowell L. Siler, Durham, for Durham County.

*62Angela I. Carmon, for City of Winston Salem.

R. Michael Cox, Pasquotank County Attorney, for Pasquotank County.

Debra Bechtel, for Catawba County.

Sam Shames, Gastonia, for Gaston County.

John F. Henning, Jr., Franklin, for Town of Franklin.

Wesley L. Deaton, for Lincoln County.

Huey B. Marshall, Bolivia, for Brunswick County.

Edmond W. Caldwell, Jr., Executive Vice President and General Counsel, for N.C. Sheriffs' Association.

Leon M. Killian, III, Raleigh, for Haywood County.

Chester M. Jones, Franklin, for Macon County.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of October 2014 by Gaston County for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18504]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Policy Statement Number PS-ACE100-2005-10038]


Policy on Bonded Joints and Structures--Technical Issues and 
Certification Considerations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of policy statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance of a Federal Aviation 
Administration (FAA) policy for certification of bonded structures. 
This notice is necessary to advise the public, especially manufacturers 
of normal, and acrobatic category airplanes, and commuter category 
airplanes and their suppliers, that the FAA has adopted a policy on 
bonded joints and structures.

DATES: Policy statement PS-ACE100-2005-10038 was issued by the Manager 
of the Small Airplane Directorate on September 2, 2005.
    How to Obtain Copies: A paper copy of policy statement may be 
obtained by writing to the following: Small Airplane Directorate, 
Standards Office (ACE-110), Aircraft Certification Service, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust Street, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 
64106. The policy statement will also be available on the Internet at 
the following address http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lester Cheng, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Small Airplane Directorate, Regulations & Policy, ACE-
111, 901 Locust Street, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; 
telephone: (316) 946-4111; fax: 816-4090; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#acc0c9dfd8c9de82cfc4c9c2cbeccacdcd82cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d11180e09180f531e1518131a3d1b1c1c531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    We announced the availability of the policy statement on May 27, 
2005 (70 FR 30829). We revised the policy in response to the comments, 
and the policy has been adopted.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on September 12, 2005.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-18504 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# CE2004084EN.01073201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/732 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/732

---

(2004/C 84 E/0824)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3142/03

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 October 2003)

Subject:   Career movements of Directors-General

Subject:

Could the Commission submit to the Parliament a full analysis of all career movements of Directors-General since 1999 including a full list of all people who have held that office for any part of that period, details about when they first became a Director-General, any subsequent positions in the institutions they have held, any reasons for excluding someone from the mobility policy, their ages and their anticipated retirement date?

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Jacobi Paylor WALKER.

No. 233P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

James R. Parish, Fayetteville, for Walker, Jacobi Paylor.

Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

*208Jacobi Paylor Walker, for Walker, Jacobi Paylor.

Samuel B. Currin, III, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th of July 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# cc: Hon. Kimberly A. Wanker, District Judge Laksmi Nashringa Braithwaite Nye County District Attorney Attorney General/Carson City Nye County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

# 2
(01 1947A 

### .57g110,:;TA:Ltftgatri , 

## r irigEkr

- S 41 .13 1 40 ,4 4:44tvenilaek

. nt;etgati=t,14 wtexami,ndornp4,-Par
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 29, 2008

Mr. Thomas B. Alleman

Winstead Sechrest & Minick, P.C.

1201 Elm Street, Suite 5400

Dallas, TX 75270

Mr. Gene F. Creely II

Cozen O'Connor

1221 McKinney, Suite 2900

Houston, TX 77010

RE:Case Number:  07-0639

Court of Appeals Number:  

Trial Court Number:  06-10727

Style:DON'S BUILDING SUPPLY, INC.

v.

ONEBEACON INSURANCE COMPANY, AS ASSIGNEE OF POTOMAC INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 07-0639Page 1**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Natural Resources Conservation Service 

# AGENCY:

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Department of Agriculture, New York State Office. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of proposed changes in the NRCS National Handbook of Conservation Practices, Section IV of the New York State Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) for review and comment. 

# SUMMARY:

It is the intention of NRCS to issue one revised conservation practice standard in its National Handbook of Conservation Practices. This standard is: Wastewater Treatment Strip (NY635). 

# DATES:

Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with the date of this publication. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Inquire in writing to Paul W. Webb, State Resource Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 441 S. Salina Street, Fifth Floor, Suite 354, Syracuse, New York 13202-2450. 

A copy of this standard is available from the above individual. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 343 of the Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after enactment of the law to NRCS State Technical Guides used to carry out highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that period, a determination will be made to the NRCS regarding disposition of those comments and final determination of change will be made. 

      ( print page 54896)    
Dated: September 1, 2005. 

Paul W. Webb, 

State Resource Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Syracuse, NY. 

[FR Doc. 05-18549 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
STATE of North Carolina v. David Quinton BIGGS, Sr.

No. COA15-393.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# C_2008209EN.01003703.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/37

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 10 June 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

(Case C-416/06) (1)

1

(2008/C 209/59)

Language of the case: Polish

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Jose Cristobal RIVERA-MEJIA.

No. COA15-947.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 16, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Telecommunications Income Fund XI (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Commercial Power Finance, Inc., General
Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 29, 2004                      /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                         Thomas J. Berthel
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Commercial Power Finance, Inc.
                                         General Partner
                                         Telecommunications Income Fund XI, L.P.
STATE of North Carolina v. Damario Montreal COXTON.

No. COA15-575.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 1, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN
Television Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Gary R. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, William A.
Cunningham, Vice President and Controller, Deborah R. Jacobson, Vice President
of Corporate Development and Treasurer, and Peter E. Maloney, Vice President of
Finance, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

         Dated: August 5, 2003   /s/ Gary R. Chapman
                                 ------------------------------------------
                                 Gary R. Chapman
                                 Chief Executive Officer

         Dated: August 5, 2003   /s/ William A. Cunningham
                                 -----------------------------------------
                                 William A. Cunningham
                                 Vice President and Controller

         Dated: August 5, 2003   /s/ Deborah R. Jacobson
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 Deborah R. Jacobson
                                 Vice President of Corporate Development and
                                 Treasurer

         Dated: August 5, 2003   /s/ Peter E. Maloney
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 Peter E. Maloney
                                 Vice President of Finance
STATE v. CARR.

No. COA08-1337.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 3, 2009.

Certification Date March 23, 2009.

Appeal from Cabarrus (04CRS54915).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63**

**of Title18 of the United States Code**

 

I, Michael T.Willis, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of Westaff, Inc.(the “Company”), that, to the best of my knowledge;

 

(1)                                  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/Afor the period ended April 19, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date:       July 2, 2008

 

 
| By:                                        | /s/ Michael T. Willis |   |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Michael T. Willis                          |                  |   |
| *President, Chief Executive  Officer, and* |                  |   |
| *acting principal financial  officer**     |                  |   |

 

* Mr. Willis is alsoacting as the Registrant’s principal financial officer as of the date of thisfiling.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by § 906 has been provided to Westaff, Inc. andwill be retained by Westaff, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
MOSTELLER MANSION v. MACTEC ENGINEERING.

No. 297P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

E. Thomison Holman, George Ward Hendon, Asheville, for Mosteller Mansion.

Calvin T. Vick, Jr., Greenville, SC, Matthew W. Kitchens, for Mactec Engineering.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of July 2008 by Calvin T. Vick, Jr. to appear Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 801 

To designate a United States courthouse located in Fresno, California, as 

the ‘‘Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2007 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate a United States courthouse located in Fresno, 

California, as the ‘‘Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse bordered by O Street, 

5 P Street, Tulare Street, and Capitol Street in Fresno, 

6 California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert 

7 E. Coyle United States Courthouse’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 801 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert E. Coyle United States 

6 Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS