alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EDISON
MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         258,445
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               324,597
<PP&E>                                       3,235,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,871,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          241,453
<BONDS>                                      2,142,807
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,130
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,053,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,871,283
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               455,817
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                153,137
<INCOME-TAX>                                    69,103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             84,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    84,034
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18066]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice 
and Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States; Committee on Rules of 
Practice and Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure will hold a 
two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not 
participation.

DATES: January 6-7, 2006.

TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Hermosa Inn, 5532 North Palo Cristi Road, Scottsdale, 
Arizona.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: September 2, 2005.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 05-18066 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2556 

_____________________________

ALEXANDER MURRAY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

March 8, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY, NORDBY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Michael Jerome Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Frank, McClanahan and Senior Judge Willis 

JANICE G. BROWN 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 1971-07-3 PER CURIAM 

 AUGUST 26, 2008 

TJ ENTERPRISES, INC. AND 

 COMPANION PROPERTY AND 

 CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Janice G. Brown, pro se, on brief). 

 (Richard S. Sperbeck; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, 

P.C., on brief), for appellee Companion Property and Casualty 

Insurance Company. 

 No brief for appellee TJ Enterprises, Inc. 

 Janice G. Brown (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission (1) denying her claim seeking payment for medical treatment by Dr. Glenn Deputy 

on the ground that such claim was barred by the doctrine of res judicata; (2) denying her claim 

seeking payment for medical treatment by Dr. Richard P. Lango on the ground that such 

treatment resulted from the unauthorized referral by Dr. Deputy and pertains to the 

non-compensable testing for, and symptoms of, multiple sclerosis or a demyelinating disease; 

and (3) finding that even, assuming arguendo, the issue of Dr. Deputy’s medical treatment had 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

not already been determined with finality, claimant failed to sustain her burden of proving such 

treatment was causally related to her compensable November 1, 2002 injury by accident.1 

Notwithstanding claimant’s failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 5A:20 with respect 

to her opening brief, we have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that 

this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in 

its final opinion. See Brown v. TJ Enterprises, Inc., VWC File No. 212-44-54 (July 10, 2007). 

We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.

 1

 The commission declined to address any remaining issues raised by claimant, as the 

deputy commissioner denied the claim on issues of causation and the bar of res judicata, and, 

therefore, any remaining issues would not change the outcome.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 12

- 00101

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S .L.L., A CHILD

,

From the County Court at Law

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 82974CCL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant s have filed a “ motion to dismiss appeal. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

It states that Appellants no longer desire to pursue this appeal.

Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it

would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismiss ed.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opini on delivered and filed May 2 , 2012

[CV06]
EXHIBIT
      32




Certification
      of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Xechem International, Inc.
      (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dr. Ramesh
      C. Pandey, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Dr. Ramesh C. Pandey,
      as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                  Ramesh C. Pandey, Ph.D.Ramesh
                  C. Pandey, Ph.D.
                Chief
                  Executive OfficerDate:
                  April 13, 2007/s/
                  Ramesh C. Pandey, Ph.D.Ramesh
                  C. Pandey, Ph.D.
                Chief
                  Financial OfficerDate:
                  April 13, 2007
II 

Calendar No. 106 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 801 

To designate a United States courthouse located in Fresno, California, as 

the ‘‘Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2007 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Reported by Mrs. BOXER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate a United States courthouse located in Fresno, 

California, as the ‘‘Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse bordered by O Street, 

5 P Street, Tulare Street, and Capitol Street in Fresno, 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 801 RS

1 California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert 

2 E. Coyle United States Courthouse’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

6 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

7 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert E. Coyle United States 

8 Courthouse’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Calendar No. 106 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 801 

A BILL 

To designate a United States courthouse located in 

United States Courthouse’’. Fresno, California, as the ‘‘Robert E. Coyle 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT






Board of Directors
Radica Games Limited


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
33-86960,  333-07000 and 333-59737 on Form S-8, and  Registration  Statement No.
333-07526  and 333-79005 on Form F-3 of Radica Games Limited of our report dated
February 12, 2001,  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Radica Games
Limited for the year ended December 31, 2000.







/S/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

HONG KONG

March ___, 2001
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Willie Dee Price, Appellant

No. 06-19-00119-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR-19-

26944). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and 

Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Willie Dee Price, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 9, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Walker v. The N.C. State Board of Dental Examiners

95PA16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2016

Ryan McKaig, Attorney at Law, Elizabeth Brooks Scherer, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Walker, Cynthia (D.D.S.).

Carolin Bakewell, Attorney at Law, Matthew W. Sawchak, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for The N.C. State Board of Dental Examiners *396The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of July 2016 by Matt Sawchak to Appear:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2016."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Leona St. Helen, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 426]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 29, 2002 *(People v St. Helen,*293 AD2d 765 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered July 23, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., H. Miller, Schmidt and Santucci, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, of
CKE Restaurants, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew F. Puzder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 780(d)); and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. In witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this certificate as of the date
set forth opposite his signature below. Date: April 29, 2005
    
    /s/ Andrew F. PuzderAndrew F. PuzderChief Executive Officer
iii i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-07-00880-CR

Lupe GOMEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-CR-6522

Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 3, 2008

AFFIRMED

Appellant Lupe Gomez was charged by indictment with burglary of a habitation with the

intent to commit a felony (repeater). Gomez entered an open plea of nolo contendere and pled true

to having previously been convicted of murder. He was then sentenced to forty years of

imprisonment. Gomez timely filed a notice of appeal. His court-appointed appellate attorney has

filed a brief in which she raises two arguable points of error, but nonetheless concludes that this

appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State,
04-07-00880-CR

-2-

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel states that appellant was provided with a copy of

the brief and motion to withdraw and was further informed of his right to review the record and file

his own brief. See Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

Gomez did not file a pro se brief. 

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and

without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the motion to

withdraw. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.);

Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. 

Karen Angelini, Justice

Do not publish
IN RE D.H.

No. COA08-667.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Rowan (07JT176, 07JT177, 07JT178, 07JT179).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
State of North Carolina v. Timothy Allen Foxworth

No. 188P16

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Mr. Douglas W. Corkhill, Assistant Attorney General, Mr. J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

Mr. Timothy Allen Foxworth, For Foxworth, Timothy Allen.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 13th of May 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th of May 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th of May 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,752,620
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         173,728
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               313,047
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 53,688,276
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      19,298,220
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        19,416,130
<LOANS>                                    147,901,019
<ALLOWANCE>                                    490,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             231,140,190
<DEPOSITS>                                 172,902,844
<SHORT-TERM>                                25,266,250
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,648,286
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,934
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,305,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             231,140,190
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,644,544
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,442,580
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               313,561
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            16,400,685
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,845,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,839,417
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,561,268
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  110,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,131,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,808,770
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,668,807
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,668,807
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.55
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   975,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               380,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              490,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        490,000


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Milton A. Alpern, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Applix, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [Not applicable]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Dated: November 15, 2004 /s/ Milton A. Alpern   Milton A. Alpern   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer