alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State v. Chad Braxton Bumpers

239P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2016

Sterling Rozear, Attorney at Law, For Bumpers, Chad Braxton.

Allison A. Angell, Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney Generals, Michael D. Waters, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of June 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of June 2016."
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Edward P. Mooney            |   |   |   |   |
| Edward P. Mooney, Chief Executive Officer |   |   |   |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)             |   |   |   |   |

----
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Richard Lambright, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 14, 2008





/s/
                Richard LambrightRichard
                LambrightPrincipal
                Accounting Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-75,990 & AP-75,991

EX PARTE NATHANIEL HOWARD, III, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 007-1360-07-A AND 007-1359-07-A

IN THE 7TH DISTRICT COURT FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

sexual assault and aggravated kidnapping and sentenced to life imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal.

The trial court has determined that Applicant always wanted to appeal and he was wholly

deprived of the right to appeal through no fault of his own. We find, therefore, that Applicant is
entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time appeals of the judgments of conviction in Cause No.

007-1360-07-A and 007-1359-07-A from the 7th Judicial District Court of Smith County. Applicant

is ordered returned to that time at which he may give written notices of appeal so that he may then,

with the aid of counsel, obtain meaningful appeals. All time limits shall be calculated as if the

sentences had been imposed on the date on which the mandates of this Court issue. We hold that,

should Applicant desire to prosecute appeals, he must take affirmative steps to file written notices

of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: September 10, 2008

Do Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18527]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panels (SEP): Surveillance Review, Program Announcement PAR-
04-106

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting:

    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Surveillance Review, Program 
Announcement PAR-04-106.
    Times and Dates: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., November 2, 2005 (Closed), 8 
a.m.-5 p.m., November 3, 2005 (Closed).
    Place: Marriott Inner Harbor at Camden Yard, 110 South Eutaw 
Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, Telephone Number 410.962.0202.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to: 
Surveillance Review, Program Announcement PAR-04-106.
    Contact Person For More Information: Steve Olenchock, PhD, 
Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health, CDC, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26506, 
Telephone 304.285.6127.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 05-18527 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
**Exhibit 31.2** **SECTION 302    CERTIFICATION**     I, Karl Brenza, Chief Financial Officer of enherent Corp.,    certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on    Form 10-K    of enherent Corp.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/  Karl Brenza    Karl Brenza    Chief Financial Officer     May 15, 2006
STATE v. Rodney Moucell JONES.

No. 271P14-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 25, 2015.

Rodney Moucell Jones, Spruce Pine, for Jones, Rodney Moucell.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Todd Williams, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of November 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of November 2015."
# C_2010100EN.01003701.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — Bundesverband deutscher Banken v Commission

(Case T-36/06) (1)

1

(State aid - Transfer of public assets to Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale - Decision finding that the notified measure does not constitute aid - Private investor test - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Serious difficulties)

2010/C 100/56

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bundesverband deutscher Banken eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Niemeyer and K.-S. Scholz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan and T. Scharf, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Land Hessen (Germany) (represented initially by H.-J. Freund and M. Holzhäuser, and subsequently by H.-J. Freund and S. Lehr, lawyers); and Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by H.-J. Freund, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 3232 final of 6 September 2005 relating to the transfer of the Hessischer Investitionsfonds (Hessian Investment Fund) as a silent partnership contribution to Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Bundesverband deutscher Banken eV to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, the Land Hessen and Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Bundesverband deutscher Banken eV to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, the Land Hessen and Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale.

---

(1)  OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

1

---
STATE v. Jeremie Labrandon STEVENSON.

No. 381P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Jeremie Labrandon Stevenson, Polkton, for Stevenson, Jeremie Labrandon.

*564Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of November 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
BYRD, et al. v. FRANKLIN COUNTY.

No. 462A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Aubrey S. Tomlinson, Jr., Louisburg, for Franklin County (NC).

George B. Currin, Raleigh, for Byrd, Aaron, et al.

Camden R. Webb, Raleigh, for Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of June 2015 by Respondent to Strike Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.'s Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                                   2,087
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              728
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                                     515
<DEPRECIATION>                                              93
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           3,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    2,428
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                   500
<OTHER-SE>                                                 320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             3,340
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         3,737
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            3,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            168
<INCOME-TAX>                                                67
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        101
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                               101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .02
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

         CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                                 SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Applix, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2001 as originally filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2001 and as amended on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Walt Hilger, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ Walt Hilger
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Walt Hilger
                                        Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 19, 2003










A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Applix, Inc. and will be retained by Applix, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2009044EN.01000202.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2008 — Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Orange A/S

(Case C-16/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Articles 8 and 63 - Word mark MOBILIX - Opposition by the proprietor of the Community and national word mark OBELIX - Partial rejection of the opposition - Reformatio in pejus - ‘Counteraction’ theory - Modification of the subject-matter of the dispute - Documents included as an annex to the application as new evidence before the Court of First Instance)

Reformatio in pejus

(2009/C 44/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl (represented by: J. Pagenberg, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent), Orange A/S (represented by: J. Balling, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 27 October 2005 in Case T-336/03 Editions Albert René v OHIM — Orange (MOBILIX) by which that Court dismissed an action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the Community and national word mark ‘OBELIX’ in respect of certain goods and services classed inter alia in Classes 9, 16, 28, 35, 41 and 42 against Decision R 559/2002-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 July 2003 rejecting in part the application brought against the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition proceeding brought against the application to register the word mark MOBILIX in respect of certain goods and services classed in Classes 9, 16, 35, 37, 38 and 42

Editions Albert René

OHIM

Orange (MOBILIX)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.

1

---
----

(2004/C 65 E/267)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2977/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(6 October 2003)

Subject:   High prices and inadequate veterinary inspections in Greece

According to Greek consumer organisations and the Greek Ministry of Development prices watchdog body, consumer prices have increased steeply over the past year, while wholesalers (particularly in the agricultural sector) are coming under growing criticism for purchasing products cheaply in situ and selling them at very high prices, doubling or tripling the final amounts paid by consumers in Greece.

According to the most recent Eurostat data, per capita income in Greece amounts to scarcely 67 % -69 % of the Community average while salaries and pensions there are among the lowest in the EU.

Added to this, the strike by veterinarians and related professions in the livestock sector has left enormous gaps in the Greek meat marketing sector, legal livestock slaughtering having come to a halt in Greece (without the necessary veterinary inspections) and large quantities of meat are being imported (mainly from third countries) regarding which it is impossible to establish whether adequate inspections were carried out in the countries of slaughter.

What immediate action can the Commission take to ensure that the Greek authorities introduce price inspections which are effective (and not purely nominal as has been the case until now) and to impose heavy fines for price speculation? Is the Commission aware of the situation regarding meat marketing in Greece in view of repeated observations by Commissioner Byrne to the effect that health standards in Greek slaughterhouses and meat markets fall far short of those in other EU Member States?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(4 November 2003)

The Commission is continuing to monitor the hygiene conditions in meat markets and slaughterhouses in Greece and refers the Honourable Member to replies already given this year to his Written Question E-1709/03 (1), and Written Questions E-691/03 by Mr Hatzidakis (2) and P-558/03 by Mr Papayannakis (3). The Commission has no special knowledge of the impact of the circumstances described in the Honourable Member's written question. It is writing to the Member State concerned to request information and will inform the Honourable Member of its findings.

Community consumer law does not provide for means to control prices for goods offered to consumers. It only stipulates by Directive 98/6/EC that the indication of the selling price and the price per unit of measurement offered by traders to consumers improves consumer information and facilitate the comparison of prices. Inflationary price increases however are not covered by Community consumer law.

----

(1)OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 217.

(2)OJ C 222 E, 18.9.2003, p. 228.

(3)OJ C 161 E, 10.7.2003, p. 226.

----