55332 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 21, 2005 / Notices 

Parking areas in 2 to 3 areas would be 

established or modified. 

Possible Alternatives 

Preliminary alternatives which have 

been identified include the proposed 

action and the no action alternatives. 

Responsible Official 

David T. Bull, Forest Supervisor, 

Bitterroot National Forest, 1801 N. First, 

Hamilton, MT 59840. 

Nature of Decision To Be Made 

The Responsible Official will 

determine whether or not to proceed 

with the proposed project activities. 

Scoping Process 

Comments will be accepted during 

the 30-day scoping period as described 

in this notice of intent. To assist in 

commenting, a scoping letter providing 

more detailed information on the project 

proposal has been prepared and is 

available to interested parties. Contact 

Chuck Oliver, Darby District Ranger at 

the address listed in this notice of intent 

if you would like to receive a copy. An 

open house in Darby, Montana is 

planned on October 12, 2005 in Darby, 

Montana. This will be an opportunity 

for you to interact with team members 

to clarify the proposed project. 

Preliminary Issues 

Impacts to the viewshed from the 

town of Darby. 

Comment Requested 

This notice of intent initiates the 

scoping process which guides the 

development of the environmental 

impact statement. 

Early Notice of Importance of Public 

Participation in Subsequent 

Environmental Review 

The comment period on the draft 

environmental impact statement will be 

45 days from the date the 

Environmental Protection Agency 

publishes the notice of availability in 

the Federal Register. 

The Forest Service believes, at this 

early stage, it is important to give 

reviewers notice of several court rulings 

related to public participation in the 

environmental review process. First, 

reviewers of draft environmental impact 

statements must structure their 

participation in the environmental 

review of the proposal so that it is 

meaningful and alerts an agency to the 

reviewer’s position and contentions. 

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. 

NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, 

environmental objections that could be 

raised at the draft environmental impact 

statement but that are not raised until 

after completion of the final 

environmental impact statement may be 

waived or dismissed by the courts. City 

of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 

1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin 

Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 

1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of 

these court rulings, it is very important 

that those interested in this proposed 

action participate by the close of the 45 

day-comment period so that substantive 

comments and objections are made 

available to the Forest Service at a time 

when it can meaningfully consider them 

and respond to them in the final 

environmental impact statement. To 

assist the Forest Service in identifying 

and considering issues and concerns on 

the proposed action, comments on the 

draft environmental impact statement 

should be as specific as possible. It is 

also helpful if comments refer to 

specific pages or chapters of the draft 

statement. Comments may also address 

the adequacy of the draft environmental 

impact statement or the merits of the 

alternatives formulated and discussed in 

the statement. Reviewers may wish to 

refer to the Council on Environmental 

Quality Regulations for implementing 

the procedural provisions of the 

National Environmental Policy Act at 40 

CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. 

Additional public comment will be 

accepted after publication of the DEIS 

anticipated early in 2006. The 

Environmental Protection Agency will 

publish the Notice of Availability of the 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement 

in the Federal Register. The Forest will 

also publish a legal notice of availability 

in the Ravalli Republic, Hamilton, 

Montana. The comment period on the 

Draft EIS will begin the day after the 

legal notice is published. The Final EIS 

and Decision are expected late in 2006. 

Dated: September 15, 2005. 

David T. Bull, 

Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 05–18792 Filed 9–20–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–588–804, A–559–801) 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results and Final Results 

of the Full Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders on Ball 

Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

Japan and Singapore 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 21, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev 

Primor at 202–482–4114 or Fred W. 

Aziz at 202–482–4023, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. 

Extension of Time Limits 

In accordance with section 

751(c)(5)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), the U.S. Department 

of Commerce (the Department) may 

extend the period of time for making its 

determination by not more than 90 days, 

if it determines that the sunset review 

is extraordinarily complicated. As set 

forth in 751(c)(5)(C)(v) of the Act, the 

Department may treat a sunset review as 

extraordinarily complicated if it is a 

review of a transition order. The sunset 

reviews subject to this notice are 

transition orders. Therefore, the 

Department has determined, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(5)(C)(v) of the Act, that 

these sunset reviews are extraordinarily 

complicated and require additional time 

for the Department to complete its 

analysis. 

The Department’s preliminary results 

of these full sunset reviews were 

scheduled for September 19, 2005, and 

the final results were scheduled for 

January 27, 2006. They are now being 

extended until December 19, 2005, and 

April 27, 2006, respectively. These dates 

are 90 days from the original scheduled 

dates of the preliminary and final 

results of these sunset reviews. 

This notice is issued in accordance 

with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and (C)(v) of 

the Act. 

Dated: September 15, 2005. 

Barbara E. Tillman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05–18852 Filed 9–20–05; 8:45 am] 

(BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–SP)