alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C.. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended.  The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Minority Programs Review Committee, MARC Review Subcommittee A.                    

*Date:*                         February 17, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Richard I. Martinez, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN-12B, 45 Center Drive MSC 6200, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200, 301-594-2489,                         *rm63f@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 25, 2005.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-1836  Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
ex4-5.htm


 


Exhibit 4.5


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 



	  	  	  
	
$80,000.00

	  	
August 15th, 2008







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Global Clean Energy, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Maker”) promises to pay to the order of Vision Capital Partners AA., Ltd. (“Lender”), at its principal office, or at such other place as may be designated in writing by the holders of this Promissory Note (“Note”), the principal sum of EIGHTY THOUSAND 00/100 DOLLARS ($80,000.00) (the “Principal Sum”). The unpaid Principal Sum shall bear interest at 7.5% per annum and shall be due in twelve (12) months.


 


All payments to be made under this Note shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America which shall be legal tender for public and private debts at the time of payment.


 


In the event that an action is instituted to collect this Note, or any portion thereof, Maker promises to pay all costs of collection, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees, court costs, and such other sums as the court may establish.


 


In the event of a default under this Note when due, then the holder of this Note, at its election, may declare the entire unpaid Principal Sum due and payable.


 


Every provision hereof is intended to be several. If any provision of this Note is determined, by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the other provisions hereof, which shall remain binding and enforceable.


 


This Note is made in the State of Maryland and it is mutually agreed that Maryland law shall apply to the interpretation of the terms and conditions of this Note.


 


All agreements between the holder of this Note and Maker are hereby expressly limited so that in no contingency or event whatsoever, whether by reason of deferment or acceleration of the maturity of this Note or otherwise, shall the rate of interest hereunder exceed the maximum permissible under applicable law with respect to the holder. If, from any circumstances whatsoever, the rate of interest resulting from the payment and/or accrual of any amount of interest hereunder, at any time that payment of interest is due and/or at any time that interest is accrued, shall exceed the limits prescribed by such applicable law, then the payment and/or accrual of such interest shall be reduced to that resulting from the maximum rate of interest permissible under such applicable law. This provision shall never be superseded or waived.


 


The makers, endorsers, and/or guarantors of this Note do hereby severally waive presentment, demand, protest and notices of protest, demand, dishonor and nonpayment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the date first hereinabove set forth.


 


 


GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY, INC.


 


 


By:/s/ Kenneth Adessky


Kenneth Adessky,


C.F.O
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 05-142]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark office, and are available for licensing.

DATES: September 16, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda B. Blackburn, Patent Counsel, 
Langley Research Center, Mail Code 141, Hampton, VA 23681-2199; 
telephone (757) 864-9260; fax (757) 864-9190.

NASA Case No. LAR-16877-1: Double Vacuum Bag Process for Resin Matrix 
Composite Manufacturing;
NASA Case No. LAR-17157-1: Liquid Crystalline Thermosets From Ester, 
Ester-Imide, and Ester-Amide Oligomers;
NASA Case No. LAR-16615-2: Polyimide Foams;
NASA Case No. LAR-16907-1: Deconvolution Methods and Systems for the 
Mapping of Acoustic Sources From Phased Microphone Arrays;
NASA Case No. LAR-16437-1-NP: Templated Growth of Carbon Nanotubes;
NASA Case No. LAR-16256-1: Method and Apparatus for Performance 
Optimization Through Physical Perturbation of Task Elements;
NASA Case No. LAR-16535-1: Composite Panel Having Subsonic Transverse 
Wave Speed Characteristics;
NASA Case No. LAR-15816-3: Piezoelectric Composite Apparatus and a 
Method for Fabricating the Same;
NASA Case No. LAR-16900-1: Carbon Nanotube-Based Sensor and Method for 
Detection of Crack Growth in a Structure;
NASA Case No. LAR-16946-1: Noise Reduction of Aircraft Flap.

    Dated: September 12, 2005.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel, Administration and Management.
[FR Doc. 05-18462 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00185-CR

______________________________

DESMOND DENARD BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

 Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 34659-B

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Desmond Denard Brown filed pro se a notice of appeal August 26, 2008, appealing from a

judgment that imposed his sentence December 12, 2006. 

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918

S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Rule 26.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

prescribes the time period in which a notice of appeal must be filed by a defendant in order to perfect

appeal in a criminal case. A defendant's notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the

day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the

defendant timely files a motion for new trial. TEX.R.APP. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. No

motion for new trial was filed. The last date Brown could timely file his notice of appeal was

January 11, 2007, thirty days after the day the sentence was imposed in open court. SeeTEX.R.APP.

P. 26.2(a)(1). 

In addition to the notice of appeal being untimely filed, the certification of right of appeal

shows that Brown waived his right of appeal.

Unless a certification, showing that a defendant has the right of appeal, is in the record, we

must dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Because the trial court's certification

affirmatively shows Brown has no right of appeal, and because the record before us does not reflect

that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005),

we must dismiss the appeal.
3

Brown has failed to perfect his appeal. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: September 3, 2008

Date Decided: September 4, 2008

Do Not Publish
STATE v. Zachary David THOMSEN.

No. 308A15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 7, 2016.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Thomsen, Zachary David.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Maureen Krueger, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 7th of January 2016 by State of NC:

> *469"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of January 2016."
exv10w11






Exhibit 10.11




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

SWIFT CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




(As
last amended and restated effective January 1, 2008)



     THIS
AMENDMENT is made and entered into on September 9, 2010, by Swift Corporation (“Employer”).



R
E C I T A L S:




     1. The Employer maintains the Swift Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (“Plan”);



     2. The Employer has reserved the right to amend the Plan in whole or in part;
and



     3. The Employer intends to amend the Plan.



     THEREFORE, the Employer hereby adopts this Amendment as follows:



     1. The second sentence in Section 1.1 of the Plan is amended to read as
follows: “The Plan also is intended to be a deferred
compensation plan within the meaning of Code Section 409A, and the Plan shall be construed and interpreted in a manner that complies with Code Section 409A.”




     2. Section 5.6 of the Plan is amended by deleting the second sentence of that
Section.



     3. The
Effective Date of this Amendment shall be January 1, 2009.



     4. Except as amended, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	SWIFT CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Cheryl Maccarn
 	 
	 	 	Title:  Director of Benefits
# C_2008272EN.01002401.xml

| 25.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/24

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2008 — Germany v Commission

(Cases T-349/06, T-371/06, T-14/07, T-15/07 and in Case T-332/07) (1)

1

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Change in the financing plan without the consent of the Commission - Concept of significant change - Article 24 of Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 - Actions for annulment)

(2008/C 272/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and, in Cases T-349/06, T-371/06, T-14/07 and T-15/07, also by C. Schulze-Bahr, Agents, assisted by C. von Donat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Wilms and L. Flynn, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

ACTION for the annulment of Decisions C(2006) 4193 final and C(2006) 4194 final of 25 September 2006, Decisions C(2006) 5163 final and C(2006) 5164 final of 3 November 2006 and Decision C(2007) 2619 final of 25 June 2007 reducing the financial assistance from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) for Objective 2 1997-1999 of the RESIDER — Nordrhein-Westfalen Operational Programme 1994-1999, for the Operational Programmes for Nordrhein-Westfalen in the framework of the common SME (small and medium-sized enterprises) and RECHAR II initiatives, and for the Operational Programme for Community structural assistance in the Objective 2 regions of Land Nordrhein-Westfalen for the period 1994-1996 respectively.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Case T-332/07 to Cases T-349/06, T-371/06, T-14/07 and T-15/07 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Case T-332/07 to Cases T-349/06, T-371/06, T-14/07 and T-15/07 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          65,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,500
<INVENTORY>                                    130,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               625,600<F1>
<PP&E>                                       1,540,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 879,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,577,800<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          688,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           700
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,577,800
<SALES>                                      1,463,400<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,511,900
<CGS>                                          884,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  884,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,200<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (214,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (69,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (145,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,600)<F4>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (35,300)<F5>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (183,600)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.46)
        
<FN>
<F1> Includes net assets of discontinued operations of $8,300.
<F2> Excludes sales of $431,200 of the Packaging Business, which was classified
     as a discontinued operation as of December 31, 1997.
<F3> Excludes interest expense allocated to Grace's discontinued operations of
     $13,300 ($8,700 after-tax).
<F4> Includes pretax operating income of the Packaging Business of $60,500
     ($39,900 after-tax), allocated interest expense of $13,300 ($8,700 
     after-tax), costs related to the Packaging Business transaction of
     $32,600 ($28,300 after-tax) and a related pension plan curtailment loss of
     $8,400 ($5,500 after-tax).
<F5> Reflects extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax.
</FN>










</TABLE>
# C_2011211EN.01002201.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2011 — Total and Elf Aquitaine v Commission

(Case T-206/06) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for methacrylates - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Rights of the defence - Presumption of innocence - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of equal treatment - Principle that penalties must fit the offence - Principle of nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege - Principle of sound administration - Principle of legal certainty - Misuse of powers - Fines - Attribution of liability for payment within a group of companies)

2011/C 211/47

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Total and Elf Aquitaine (Courbevoie, France) and Elf Aquitaine SA (Courbevoie, France) (represented by: É. Morgan de Rivery and S. Thibault-Liger, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially F. Arbault and V. Bottka, subsequently V. Bottka and F. Castillo de la Torre, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Articles 1(c) and (d), 2(b), 3 and 4 of Commission Decision C(2006) 2098 final of 31 May 2006 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.645 — Methacrylates) and, in the alternative, amendment of Article 2(b) of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 28.10.2006.

1

---
Roberto RAMIREZ, Employee, Plaintiff, v. BRIEGAN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., Employer, Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company, Carrier, and (Summit Holdings, Servicing Agent), Defendants.

No. COA15-673.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 16, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. William M. HUGGINS.

No. 459P00-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Feb. 3, 2016.

William M. Huggins, for Huggins, William M.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 6th of October 2015 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Iredell County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Eugene STREET.

No. COA14-1297.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Sept. 15, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Prejudicial Error.
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

 

	
	





 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE
OF DELAWARE. N/C TO: INCONTACT, INC. UCN. Number 11246. Authorized common stock: 100,000,000 shares, par value: xxx .0001. Shares CUSIP No. 45336E 10 9. This certifies that specimen is the record holder of N/C to: Incontact, Inc. Shares of xxx
Common Stock transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the
Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: Kymm E. Portridge, Secretary, Paul Jarman, Chief Executive Officer. UCN, Inc. Corporate Seal Delaware. Interwest Transfer
Co. Inc. P.O. Box 17136 / Salt Lake City, Utah 84117. Countersigned & Registered. Countersigned Transfer Agent-Authorized Signature. 10-C Copyright 2004 / Reynolds Graphics, Inc. / Salt Lake City, Utah. 







 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations. Ten Com - as tenants in common, Ten Ent - as tenants by the entireties, JT Ten - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not
as tenants in common. UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State). Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto Please
insert social security or other identifying number of assignee. (Please print or typewrite name and address, including zip code, of assignee) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated. Notice: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the
certificate in every particular without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever. *Notice signature guaranteed: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a registered national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a
savings bank) or a trust company. The guaranteeing firm must be a member of the Medallion Guarantee Program. Transfer fee will apply. For medallion guarantee use only. Specimen.