alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2014 of 25 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2014                     

# of 25 August 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# C_2008209EN.01004801.xml

| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/48

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2008 — Hartmann v OHIM (E)

(Case T-302/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark ‘E’ - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Error of law - Lack of real assessment - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 209/83)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim, Germany) (represented by: K. Gründig-Schnelle, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 September 2006 (Case R 805/2006-4) concerning an application for registration of the word mark ‘E’ as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 5 September 2006 (Case R 805/2006-4). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 5 September 2006 (Case R 805/2006-4).

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay its own costs as well as those of Paul Hartmann AG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay its own costs as well as those of Paul Hartmann AG.

---

(1)  OJ C 310, 16.12.2006

1

---
# C_2008313EN.01005503.xml

| 6.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/55

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 4 September 2008 — Dragoman v Commission

(Case F-147/06) (1)

1

(Staff case - Open competition - Non-admission to the oral test)

(2008/C 313/99)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Adriana Dragoman (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Mihailescu, and, subsequently, by G.-F. Dinulescu, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Herrmann and M. Velardo, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the selection board for open competition EPSO/AD/44/06 CJ, made for the purpose of establishing a reserve list for the recruitment of Romanian-language lawyer-linguists, to award the applicant a mark of 18/40 in written test (b) and not to admit her to the oral test for that competition

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 42, 24.2.2007, p. 48.

1

---
ex4-6.htm


 


Exhibit 4.6







PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 



	$30,000.00 CND 	May 15th, 2009





 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Global Clean Energy, Inc., a Maryland corporation ("Maker") promises to pay to the order of Sylvain McMahon ("Lender"), at his principal office, or at such other place as may be designated in writing by the holders of this Promissory Note ("Note"), the principal sum of THIRTY THOUSAND 00/100 CANADIAN DOLLARS ($30,000.00 CDN) (the "Principal Sum").  The unpaid Principal Sum shall bear interest at 7.5% per annum payable annually and shall be due in twenty-four (24) months.







All payments to be made under this Note shall be payable in lawful money of the Canada which shall be legal tender for public and private debts at the time of payment.







In the event that an action is instituted to collect this Note, or any portion thereof, Maker promises to pay all costs of collection, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, and such other sums as the court may establish.







In the event of a default under this Note when due, then the holder of this Note, at its election, may declare the entire unpaid Principal Sum due and payable.







Every provision hereof is intended to be several.  If any provision of this Note is determined, by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the other provisions hereof, which shall remain binding and enforceable.







This Note is made in the Province of Quebec and it is mutually agreed that Quebec law shall apply to the interpretation of the terms and conditions of this Note.







All agreements between the holder of this Note and Maker are hereby expressly limited so that in no contingency or event what­soever, whether by reason of deferment or acceleration of the maturity of this Note or otherwise, shall the rate of interest hereunder exceed the maximum permissible under applicable law with respect to the holder.  If, from any circumstances whatsoever, the rate of interest resulting from the payment and/or accrual of any amount of interest hereunder, at any time that payment of interest is due and/or at any time that interest is accrued, shall exceed the limits prescribed by such applicable law, then the payment and/or accrual of such interest shall be reduced to that resulting from the maximum rate of interest permissible under such applicable law.  This provision shall never be superseded or waived.







The makers, endorsers, and/or guarantors of this Note do hereby severally waive presentment, demand, protest and notices of protest, demand, dishonor and nonpayment.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the date first hereinabove set forth.












                                GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY, INC.












                                By:  /s/ Kenneth Adessky                                   


Kenneth Adessky,


C.F.O
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Ultradata Systems Incorporated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Ultradata Systems, Incorporated and will be retained by
Ultradata Systems, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

November 6, 2006                      /s/  Huakang Zhou
                                      -------------------------------
                                      Huakang Zhou
                                      (Chief executive officer and
                                        chief financial officer)
In the Matter of N.S.W.

No. COA15-1048.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed in Part, and Reversed in Part.
Jeffery WHITEHURST, Petitioner-Appellant v. ALEXANDER COUNTY, Alexander County Planning and Zoning Board of Adjustment and William Sipes, Respondents-Appellees.

No. COA15-265.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 2, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed; Remanded for Correction of Clerical Error.
# CE2004078EN.01009601.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/96

---

(2004/C 78 E/0096)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2240/03

by Bartho Pronk (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(7 July 2003)

Subject:   Follow-up to an application for a driving licence in another EU Member State

Subject:

On 15 May 2003 the Commission answered my Written Question E-1269/03 (1). However, the answer is incomplete. The Commission acknowledges that some applicants may not meet the 185-day requirement in any Member State, but fails to deal with the second part of my question, namely what steps individuals and Member States should take in such a case.

1

Can the Commission answer the following:

| 1. | In the situation outlined above, what should citizens and Member States do in order to comply with what the Commission sees as the clear requirement laid down in Directive 91/439/EEC (2)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the situation outlined above, what should citizens and Member States do in order to comply with what the Commission sees as the clear requirement laid down in Directive 91/439/EEC (2)?

2

| 2. | If a question consists of three parts, would it not be better for the Commission to answer each part separately, so as to ensure that none is forgotten? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If a question consists of three parts, would it not be better for the Commission to answer each part separately, so as to ensure that none is forgotten?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(12 September 2003)

(12 September 2003)

As the Commission has already indicated to the Honourable Member, the description of normal residence given in Article 9 of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences constitutes a detailed definition of where a person has his or her normal residence. It also points to the solution to be adopted in specific cases, including where a person does not live for at least 185 days a year in any Member State. In this case, ‘the normal residence ... shall be regarded as being the place of his personal ties.’ Each person thus has a normal residence in one of the Member States and will need to approach the authorities of that Member State in order to obtain a driving licence. Since the notion of normal residence is also useful in respect of other dealings with the authorities, e.g. in relation to tax matters, members of the public should in principle be in possession of such information.

---

(1)  OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 171.

1

(2)  OJ L 237, 24.8.1991, p. 1.

2

---
STATE v. Jose Luis MACIAS.

No. 510P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 2, 2015.

Jose Luis Macias, Nashville, for Macias, Jose Luis.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of August 2015 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of September 2015."
Exhibit
10.46


Hardee’s
Food Systems, Inc.




Amendment
No. 1


To


Employment
Agreement




This
Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to
Employment Agreement is made effective as of January 26, 2010, by and between
Hardee’s Food Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) and Robert
J. Starke (the “Employee”).




RECITALS:




A.  The
Company and the Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of
January 27, 2009 (the “Agreement”).




B.  The
Company and Employee now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth
below.






AGREEMENT




1.  Other Compensation and
Fringe Benefits.  Section 4(d) of the Agreement is hereby
amended to extend the bonus provided for therein to fiscal year
2011.




2.  Definitions.  Terms
used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the respective meanings
assigned to them in the Agreement.




3.  Counterparts.  This
Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute one
Amendment.




4.  Terms and Conditions of
Agreement.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment,
all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.






[Signature
Page Follows]










IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by the undersigned as of the date
first written above.










/s/ Robert J.
      StarkeRobert J.
      Starke
 
 CKE Restaurants,
      Inc.By:
                    /s/ Andrew F.
      PuzderAndrew F.
      Puzder,Chief Executive
      Officer
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

July 9, 2014

 

Mr. Marc Rowland

2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 900

Dallas, TX 75219

 

Re:                             Consulting Services.

 

Dear Mr. Rowland:

 

Warren Resources, Inc. (“Warren”) wants to engage your consulting services in addition to the services you already provide in your capacity as director. You will provide such consulting services as an independent contractor, but for the avoidance of doubt, you will at all times remain subject to the duties of a director under Maryland law.

 

The scope of this consultation will be as agreed to between yourself and Warren but is contemplated to include, without limitation, the following:

 

·                  Consultation on mergers and acquisitions;

·                  Consultation on financial and accounting matters, including without limitation hedging;

·                  Advice and consultation related to financial services and markets; and

·                  Other consulting services as determined by Warren and you by mutual consent.

 

Compensation for your services will be $10,000.00 per month, paid quarterly in arrears.

 

The effective date of this agreement shall be July 10, 2014 with an ending date of July 10, 2015, with automatic successive annual renewals, unless terminated in writing by either party. Either party may terminate the agreement for any or no reason at any time on 3 days written notice.

 

Please indicate your acceptance of this agreement by signing below and returning to the undersigned.

 

	
 
    	
Sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
Warren Resources, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Philip A Epstein
    
	
 
    	
Chief Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Agreed to Accepted this 9th day of July, 2014
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Marc Rowland
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**RECKSONOPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.**

 

**Certificationof Gregory F. Hughes, Treasurer of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole generalpartner of the Registrant, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18**

**ofthe United States Code**

 

I, Gregory F.Hughes,Treasurer of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole general partner of RecksonOperating Partnership, L. P. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1)         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Companyfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2)         The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 13, 2009 |   |                                        |
|-----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                              | By     | /s/  GREGORY F. HUGHES                      |
|                              |   | Gregory  F. Hughes                          |
|                              |   | Treasurer                                   |
|                              |   | of  Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC,             |
|                              |   | the  sole general partner of the Registrant |

 

----
----

(2004/C 65 E/123)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2082/03

by Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou (PPE-DE) to the Council

(24 June 2003)

Subject:   Violations of Greek air space by Turkish aircraft and security of the inhabitants of the Aegean

During a recent visit to the border islands of Samos and Ikaria I experienced the deep anxiety felt by the inhabitants at the constant, provocative violations of Aegean air space by Turkish warplanes and the impact which they have on the lives and security of the local people as well as their livelihood in the tourist industry.

The alarm was compounded, in particular, following the recent incident in which two Turkish F16 fighters harassed an Olympic Airways flight bound for Istanbul from Athens.

What view does the Council take of Turkey's conduct in this respect and what measures will it take forthwith to put an end to such violations by Turkey?

What measures will it take to address the insecurity felt by European citizens living in or travelling through the Aegean and to restore normality and peace to the wider region?

Reply

(17 November 2003)

----
Order filed September 11, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00422

- CV

____________ ANGELA ARELLANO , Appellant

V.

CHRISTOPHER STALEY, Appellee

On Appeal from Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1109147



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due August 22, 2018

. No brief or motion for extension
of time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this cou rt by October 11, 2018 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136546 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136546 

 COA: 272873 

Wayne CC: 06-005688-01

ODELL BRIAN HUNTER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 3, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of Arizona v Gant, ___ US ___; 128 S Ct 1443; 170 L Ed 2d 274 (2008), is pending 

before the United States Supreme Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an 

issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application 

be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. 

d0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit
32.2**
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual report of IGIA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kurt Streams, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (3)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (4)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
            June 17, 2005
    By:*/s/*Kurt
      StreamsKurt
      StreamsChief
      Financial Officer
RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

                                  EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL MATURO, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, TREASURER AND CFO OF
                        RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.,
        THE SOLE GENERAL PARTNER OF RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.,
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and CFO of Reckson
Associates Realty Corp. the sole general partner of Reckson Operating
Partnership, L.P. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  August 8, 2003


               RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
                   By: Reckson Associates Realty Corp., its sole general partner


                                    By /s/ Michael Maturo
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President,
                                       Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.