alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           10,634
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1,155
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  6,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      65,219
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                  0
<LOANS>                                         387,148
<ALLOWANCE>                                       4,806
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  485,001
<DEPOSITS>                                      398,051
<SHORT-TERM>                                      8,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3,925
<LONG-TERM>                                      32,582
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                45
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                       42,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  485,001
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  23,972
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4,004
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 27,976
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               12,569
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14,530
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            13,446
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     1,675
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (77)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  10,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3,225
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3,225
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,814
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     8.26
<LOANS-NON>                                       6,756
<LOANS-PAST>                                          0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     75
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   3,716
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3,502
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       371
<RECOVERIES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 4,806
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              4,806
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                               0



</TABLE>
# CE2004088EN.01064301.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/643 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/643

---

(2004/C 88 E/0660)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3357/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(13 November 2003)

Subject:   Affront to the church of Ayia Sofia in Istanbul

Subject:

The church of Ayia Sofia in Istanbul (which forms part of the world cultural heritage and stands as the ultimate symbol of Christianity, regardless of creed) is yet again the target of the Turkish authorities' destructive and invidious policies. In the last few days, the international press has reported that an utterly tasteless, plastic ‘greenhouse’ has been set up inside the church(!) exhibiting ‘works of art’ made of ... lettuce(!) by some Asiatic artist or other. This entire ‘creation’ is set off by the addition of television monitors placed at various points within the church which broadcast Muslim religious services at high volume. The contempt shown by the Turkish authorities towards a church whose history goes back several centuries and which stands as the symbol of a great Christian empire, the Byzantine, which flourished for more than 1000 years, is yet another indication of how Turkey (a candidate for accession to the EU) interprets respect for the symbols of other religions.

What action can the Commission take as a matter of urgency to place this symbolic Christian church under the protection of a European organisation (with the possible participation of the Commission's Directorate-General for Education and Culture) to guard it against the kind of desecration and damage described above?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(22 December 2003)

(22 December 2003)

In its reply to written questions E-2962/03 by Mr Alavanos (1) and E-2995/03 by Ms Kratsa-Tsagaropouiou (2), the Commission has commented on concerns similar to those expressed by the Honourable Member. The Commission monitors the progress achieved by Turkey in adopting the relevant ‘acquis’ in the area of culture, as part of Turkey's preparations for membership. Safeguarding the national heritage is not part of Community competence.

1

2

As regards any possible action, the Community's financial assistance programme for Turkey does not allow to provide support for conserving and restoring religious or cultural works, such as those stored in the Hagia Sofia.

---

(1)  OJ C 78 E, 27.3.2004, p. 771.

1

(2)  See page 125.

2

---
ex101b.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing





ADDENDUM TO THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN IMEX INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND QUADRA ENERGY SYSTEMS INC., DATED MAY 31, 2010.



This Addendum is made and is effective this 2nd day of August 2010.


	Addition to SECTION 1.1 – Organization and Interest of Parties.



IMEX and QES agree to enter into a joint venture (the “JV”), with IMEX to function as general operator in charge of the day to operations of the JV. The name of the corporation shall be “Carib Green Industries” or such other name the Management Committee properly decides from time to time. The Interests in the Joint Venture shall be as follows:


	IMEX 	40 % 
	QES 	60 % 




As used herein, "Interest" shall mean, as to each Party, the undivided percentage interest of such Party in the Joint Venture as the same may exist from time to time. The equity share will always remain constant amongst QES and IMEX even if a third party decides to offer equity participation for any particular project, although in such case(s) the total equity owned by QES and IMEX may be reduced to below 100% To earn its 40% interest in the JV, IMEX shall source and deliver feedstock material of used tires and shall be the general operator and exclusive importer and distributor of the QES2000 Systems in the Territory. 

To earn its 60% interest in the JV, QES shall deliver, install and train the staff required to operate the QES2000 Systems required from time to time in the Territory, it being understood that the title and ownership for any QES20000 System installed shall remain the property of QES until payment of the amount of USD$650,000 from the earnings of the JV for such installed QES2000 System shall be paid to QES. 

The Management Committee shall have full authorization to determine how earnings will be allocated. Further, the Management Committee shall determine when earnings will be allocated 40% to Imex and 60% to QES and also when earnings shall be applied as payment towards the QES2000 System. 









IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereby executed this Addendum agreement as of the day, month and year first above written.


	
Quadra Energy Systems Inc.

By:





	
/s/ Rosemary Samuels



Rosemary Samuels



Imex International Corp

By:



/s/ Dennis Dalley



Dennis Dalley
**Exhibit 32.2** **SECTION 906    CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report of enherent Corp. (the    “Company”) on    Form 10-K    for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Karl Brenza, Chief Financial    Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.     /s/  Karl Brenza    Karl Brenza    Chief Financial Officer     May 15, 2006     A signed original of this written statement required by    Section 906, or other document authenticating,    acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears    in typed form within the electronic version of this written    statement required by Section 906, has been provided to    enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent Corp. and    furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff    upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3818 

To repeal certain amendments to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 

with respect to lighting energy efficiency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2014 

Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal certain amendments to the Energy Policy and 

Conservation Act with respect to lighting energy efficiency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Thomas Edison BULB 

5 Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3818 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIGHTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle B of title III of the En3 ergy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 

4 110–140) is repealed. 

5 (b) APPLICATION.—The Energy Policy and Con6 servation Act (42 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.) shall be applied 

7 and administered as if subtitle B of title III of the Energy 

8 Independence and Security Act of 2007 (and the amend9 ments made by that subtitle) had not been enacted. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 782 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 782

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed in Jackson, 
     Mississippi, as the ``Thad Cochran United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2007

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed in Jackson, 
     Mississippi, as the ``Thad Cochran United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse to be constructed at the site bounded 
on the north by Court Street, on the west by West Street, on the south 
by South Street, and on the east by President Street in Jackson, 
Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the ``Thad Cochran United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thad Cochran United States 
Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 99.20****CONSENT OF R. RIVERA**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following report and documents,which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statementon Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission: 1. The technical report dated December 31, 2007 and amended February 19, 2008entitled “Amended Penasquito Project Technical Report Concepción del Oro District,Zacatecas State, México” (the “Amended Penasquito Report”); and  2. The annual information form of the Company dated March 25, 2008, which includesreference to my name in connection with information relating to the Amended PeñasquitoReport, the Los Filos Mine, the Nukay Mine, and the properties described therein.Date: March 28, 2008         /s/ Reynaldo Rivera   Name:  Reynaldo Rivera   Title:  Director, Exploration
STATE of North Carolina v. Lee Edward HUTCHENS, Defendant.

No. COA15-275.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID B. SHUMAN, a/k/a Jake, 

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph R. Goodwin,

Chief District Judge. (6:03-cr-00027-1; 6:05-cv-00116)

Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 16, 2008

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David B. Shuman, Appellant Pro Se. Charles T. Miller, United

States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, Richard Gregory McVey,

Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 2 

PER CURIAM:

David B. Shuman seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Shuman has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE v. Marcus Reymond ROBINSON.

No. 411A94-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 8, 2016.

Robert T. Thompson, Assistant District Attorney, for State of NC.

G. Robert Hicks, III, Assistant District Attorney.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

Jay H. Ferguson, Durham, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

James E. Ferguson, II, Charlotte, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

Cassandra Stubbs, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

William P. Hart, Sr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General.

D. Clark Smith, Jr., Greensboro, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

Donald H. Beskind, Raleigh, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

Edward Joseph Blocher, Jr., for Social Scientists.

Cynthia F. Adcock, for Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation of NC.

Janet Moore, for N.C. Citizens Excluded from Jury Service Based on Race.

Burton Craige, Raleigh, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Narendra K. Ghosh, Chapel Hill, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jeffrey Gerrish, for Former Senior U.S. Military Officials.

James P. Cooney, III, Charlotte, for Former Senior U.S. Military Officials.

John R. Mills, for Experts in Law and Implicit Bias.

Gregory B. Craig, for Former Senior U.S. Military Officials.

Alex T. Haskell, for Former Senior U.S. Military Officials.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

Kenneth J. Rose, Durham, for Robinson, Marcus Reymond.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*Amended*

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of January 2016 by Defendant for Clarification:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of January 2016."

ERVIN, J., recused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR KITTY HAWK, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,043,480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,644,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,587,548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,443,707
<PP&E>                                     163,364,323
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,007,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             176,800,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,341,199
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,695
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,134,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               176,800,648
<SALES>                                    101,667,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,667,297
<CGS>                                       80,113,595
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,113,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,161,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,809,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,612,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,645,042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,967,564
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,967,564
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Viewpoint
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jay S. Amato, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, in accordance with
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on
my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report to which this certification
    is attached as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                            



| |     |                 
| | --- | ----------------
| | By: | /s/ JAY S. AMATO

| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| |                                          
| | Jay S. Amato                             
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

Dated: March 30, 2004
Leroy Kelley, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

June 27, 2016

**40ORDER

Petitioner filed a motion on June 16, 2016 for resentencing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars , 410 S.C. 534, 765 S.E.2d 572 (S,C, 2014). Now, therefore, pursuant to SC CONST. Art. V, § 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Honorable R. Lawton McIntosh be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over the Petitioner's *575Motion for Resentencing in the above-captioned matter.

Judge McIntosh shall at all times be vested with concurrent jurisdiction in all circuits of the state to dispose of matters **41relating to this case, and shall decide all matters pertaining to the Petitioner's Motion, and shall retain jurisdiction over this matter regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court, and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

If necessary, to resolve issues related to the appointment of counsel, a hearing shall be conducted within thirty (30) days of this order.

Within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, Judge McIntosh shall issue a scheduling order setting forth the schedule that shall be followed in this matter, including the date of the hearing on the merits. The scheduling order may be amended as necessary.

s/Costa M. Pleicones

Costa M. Pleicones

Chief Justice