alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 632 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 632

          To provide for a hospital in Cass County, Minnesota.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2007

 Mr. Coleman (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To provide for a hospital in Cass County, Minnesota.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICARE CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL DESIGNATION.

    Section 405(h) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 
Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173; 117 Stat. 2269) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Exception.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The amendment made by paragraph 
                (1) shall not apply to the certification by the State 
                of Minnesota on or after January 1, 2006, under section 
                1820(c)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Social Security Act (42 
                U.S.C. 1395i-4(c)(2)(B)(i)(II)) of one hospital that 
                meets the criteria described in subparagraph (B) and is 
                located in Cass County, Minnesota, as a necessary 
                provider of health care services to residents in the 
                area of the hospital.
                    ``(B) Criteria described.--A hospital meets the 
                criteria described in this subparagraph if the 
                hospital--
                            ``(i) has been granted an exception by the 
                        State to an otherwise applicable statutory 
                        restriction on hospital construction or 
                        licensing prior to the date of enactment of 
                        this subparagraph; and
                            ``(ii) is located on property which the 
                        State has approved for conveyance to a county 
                        within the State prior to such date of 
                        enactment.''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Scott HAMILTON.

No. 124PA15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hamilton, Michael Scott.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Melissa Pelfrey, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***AMENDED ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 2nd of April 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

*839Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Electroscope, Inc. balance sheet as of December 31, 1996 and statements of
operation and cash flows for the nine months ended December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,609,414
<SECURITIES>                                 9,740,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  322,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                   129,340
<INVENTORY>                                    625,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,969,497
<PP&E>                                         450,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                 181,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,426,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          295,783
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,998,440
<OTHER-SE>                                     290,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,426,097
<SALES>                                      1,151,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,151,815
<CGS>                                          948,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,812,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (339,221)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,269,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,269,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,269,812)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial information extracted from the Form
10-QSB  of  American  Bingo  &  Gaming Corp. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference  to  such  financial statements. This Financial Data Schedule has been
restated.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     4372742
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1200412
<ALLOWANCES>                               (299265)
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           6872034
<PP&E>                                    12139226
<DEPRECIATION>                            (5543458)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            19308892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1662959
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     10177
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                16477079
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              19308892
<SALES>                                    3621128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           3621128
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3519178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (71304)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             260410
<INCOME-TAX>                                184068
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          76342
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 76342
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01


</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01072301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/723 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/723

---

(2004/C 84 E/0812)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1437/03

by Armin Laschet (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(15 April 2003)

Subject:   Direct payments of EUR 10 million per month in EU aid to the Palestinian Authority

Subject:

Is it correct that since 2002 the Commission has ceased payment of the monthly direct budgetary aid of EUR 10 million to the Palestinian Authority?

Is this cessation of direct budgetary aid a temporary measure or has the Commission now decided to end the monthly lump-sum payments once and for all?

What were the Commission's reasons for ending these monthly payments?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(27 May 2003)

(27 May 2003)

The primary objective of Union budgetary support to the Palestinian Authority (PA) has been to mitigate the effects of the freeze of revenue transfers by the Government of Israel, thus contributing to the functioning of the PA administration and to the restoration of the conditions necessary for peace once the present crisis is over.

The Union's support has in the short term helped to avert the collapse of the institutional structures within the Palestinian Territories. Union's support has also been tied to conditions which have promoted reform in the PA, in particular by contributing to the consolidation and transparency of the PA's public finances.

The importance of the Union's assistance to the PA was fully recognised by the international community, most recently at the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee meeting of international donors (including the European Union, United States, Norway, and the World Bank) in London on 18/19 February 2003.

Whereas the economic effects of the crisis are still putting a strain on the PA's revenues, the Israeli government has now resumed regular revenue transfers. So far, four consecutive monthly payments have been made by the Israeli government for October 2002-January 2003, paid in December 2002-March 2003. In addition, the Government of Israel has begun repaying arrears which have accumulated since December 2002. As of March 2003 a total of EUR 295 million has been paid over to the PA.

Consequently it has been possible for the Union to redirect its assistance to the PA. The current budgetary assistance programme will therefore be replaced by other forms of aid as announced by the Commission on 30 April 2003.

If Israel were to freeze transfers, a decision to resume direct budgetary support may need to be considered on the basis of an assessment of the fiscal outlook of the PA.

Payment of the final instalments of monthly budgetary support relating to November and December of 2002 will be made to the PA in the coming weeks.

A report summarising the history of Commission Budgetary Assistance in favour of the PA is sent direct to the Honourable member and to Parliament's Secretariat.

---
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001360 27-JAN-2016 08:24 AM
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00577-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M.W., A Child,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2003-CI-18359

Honorable Andy Mireles, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2009

REVERSED AND REMANDED

The parties have filed a joint motion, requesting this court reverse the trial court’s 

judgment, and that the cause be remanded to the trial court. 

The motion is GRANTED. The judgment of the trial court is REVERSED, and the cause 

is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion. The clerk of this court is directed 

to issue the mandate in this appeal contemporaneously with the issuance of the court’s opinion 

and judgment.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                   ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  NACO  Industries,,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter  Ended  August 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Verne E. Bray, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Verne E. Bray
-----------------------
Verne E. Bray
Chief Executive Officer
October 10, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 2002, as amended.
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 11, 2007. 

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 597) entitled 

‘‘An Act to extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer research for 4 years’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENTS: 

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY. 

2 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘2007’’ and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

5 The National Institutes of Health and the Department 

6 of Defense shall each submit to Congress and the Govern7 ment Accountability Office an annual report concerning the 

8 use of any amounts that it received under section 414(c) 

9 of title 39, United States Code, including a description of 

10 any significant advances or accomplishments, during the 

11 year covered by the report, that were funded, in whole or 

12 in part, with such amounts. 
2 

•S 597 EAH 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to amend 

title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of 

the United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to 

raise funds for breast cancer research.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 597 

AMENDMENTS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1997 FORM 10-Q OF JOHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          96,270
<SECURITIES>                                     1,174
<RECEIVABLES>                                  282,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,722
<INVENTORY>                                    115,108
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               528,473
<PP&E>                                       1,414,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                 616,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,753,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          285,010
<BONDS>                                        456,927
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     367,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,753,026
<SALES>                                        807,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               807,046
<CGS>                                          588,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  588,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   486
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,851
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,891
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,960
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
# CE2004070EN.01024101.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/241 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/241

---

(2004/C 70 E/260)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3232/03

by Joan Colom i Naval (PSE) to the Commission

(27 October 2003)

Subject:   Updated budget figures

Subject:

Can the Commission supply the figures for the following:

| — | the financial perspective ceilings for the years 1988 to 2003 inclusive; |
| --- | --- |

—

the financial perspective ceilings for the years 1988 to 2003 inclusive;

| — | the own resources ceilings expressed in euros, for the same period; |
| --- | --- |

—

the own resources ceilings expressed in euros, for the same period;

| — | and the budget outturn for commitment and payment appropriations for the financial years 1988 to 2002 inclusive? |
| --- | --- |

—

and the budget outturn for commitment and payment appropriations for the financial years 1988 to 2002 inclusive?

These figures should:

| — | be updated to reflect 2004 prices; |
| --- | --- |

—

be updated to reflect 2004 prices;

| — | include, for each figure, for each year, all the changes made to the initial figure, such as technical adjustments, amendments, revisions and mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, with the exception of adjustments connected with implementation of heading 2. |
| --- | --- |

—

include, for each figure, for each year, all the changes made to the initial figure, such as technical adjustments, amendments, revisions and mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, with the exception of adjustments connected with implementation of heading 2.

Can it also list all the changes made to each financial perspective since 1988, taking the now defunct annual publication ‘The Community Budget: The Facts in Figures’ as a model for this?

Answer given by Ms Schreyer on behalf of the Commission

(21 November 2003)

(21 November 2003)

Answering the Honourable Member's question will involve a complex operation of putting together long statistical series. The Commission is now working on this.

The information will be sent as soon as it is available.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50673

Conference Calendar

 

BENNIE FINISTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

T. STANDRIDGE; W. HOPKINS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-96-CV-7

- - - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The motion filed by Bennie Finister, Texas state prisoner

#649506, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is

DENIED. Finister has failed to identify a nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. The district court did not err in certifying that an

appeal would be frivolous. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997);

5th Cir. R. 42.2.
O R D E R

No.

- 2 -

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0138

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM CURTIS SMALL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 2, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 27 2021

05/27/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0138
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Douglas A.
McIntyre, the chairman, president, and chief executive officer of On2
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

            (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year
            ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

            (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                              By: /s/ DOUGLAS A. MCINTYRE
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Douglas A. McIntyre
                                                  Chairman, President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  On2 Technologies, Inc.

March 22, 2005
IN RE A.S.

No. COA08-1225.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Brunswick (07J127A, 07J128A, 08J70A).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.
Ning GAO, Plaintiff, v. Kapil JAIN, Defendant.

No. COA15-136.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 20, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Vacated and Remanded.
TSG FINISHING, LLC v. BOLLINGER.

No. 25P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Matthew K. Rogers, Hickory, for TSG Finishing, LLC.

Michael P. Thomas, for Bollinger, Keith.

Thomas Filopoulos, for Bollinger, Keith.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of January 2015 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
In re John Wesley CASH.

No. 346P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Oct. 14, 2015.

Peggy Ann Duff, Brevard, for Duff, Peggy Ann.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Transylvania County.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of October 2015 by Petitioner for Emergency Injunctive Relief:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of October 2015."