alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220. 

*Dates:*                     Written comments should be received on or before October 14, 2005 to be assured of consideration.  Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)                 

*OMB Number:*                     1506-0022.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                 

*Title:*                     Customer Identification Programs for Future Commission Merchants and Introducing Brokers.                 

*Description:*                     Section 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act added a subsection (1) to 31 U.S.C. 5318 of the Bank Secrecy Act that requires the Secretary of Treasury to require financial institutions to establish and maintain programs to verify the identity of customers opening an account. FinCen has adopted such rules for Futures Commission Merchants and Introducing Brokers.                 

*Respondents:*                     Business or other for-profit.                 

*Estimated Total Reporting Burden:*                     20,471 hours.                 

*Clearance Officer:*                     Russell Stephenson, (202) 354-6012, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network,  Suite 200,  2070 Chain Bridge Road,  Vienna, VA 22182.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7316, Office of Management and Budget,  Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Michael A. Robinson, 

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-18184 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-02-P
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Aug. 28, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-15534

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00508-CR-T-23-MAP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

PAUL ANTHONY GRAHAM, 

a.k.a. Paul Richard Mays, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(August 28, 2008)

Before ANDERSON, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Mark G. Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Paul Anthony Graham, has filed a
2

motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and

Graham’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. David Lavon FOWLER.

No. COA 15-239.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 20, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
# CE2004088EN.01044101.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/441 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/441

---

(2004/C 88 E/0447)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2857/03

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(26 September 2003)

Subject:   Seychelles

Subject:

Is the Commission aware of recent murders in the Seychelles which are widely believed to be instigated by the Government?

What action has the Commission taken about these?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(5 November 2003)

(5 November 2003)

The Commission is aware and concerned by rise in violent crime in the Seychelles which appears to be caused, at least in part, by worsening socio-economic conditions. It is also aware of claims of an involvement of the security forces of the Government but has no first-hand information to back this up.

If the Commission were to receive evidence of Government involvement in recent crimes, or if there were other indications of a worsening human rights situation, we would review our relations with the Seychelles.

---
##### 



1)
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. (the registrant);2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ David P. Carlson
 David P. Carlson
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement dated Sept. 22, 2009



  
 Exhibit 10.1

 Amendment No. 1 
 To 
 Agreement 

This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”) to the Agreement (“Agreement”) by and between BakBone Software Incorporated
(“BakBone”) and VantagePoint Venture Partners IV(Q) L.P., VantagePoint Venture Partners Principals Fund IV, L.P. and VantagePoint Venture Partners IV, L.P. (collectively, “VantagePoint”), made as of September 22, 2009, is
entered into by the undersigned parties hereto (“Parties”) effective as of September    , 2010 (“Amendment Effective Date”). Except as otherwise stated in this Amendment, the provisions of the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect, and unmodified. All references to articles and sections and use of defined terms herein shall have the same meanings and effect as stated in the Agreement unless otherwise stated in this Amendment. 

Whereas, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to the terms of this Amendment. 
 Now, therefore, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Paragraph 3(a) of the Agreement is
struck in its entirety and replaced by the following: 
  

	 	(a)	duly call, issue notice of and hold the annual general meeting of shareholders following conclusion of the 2010 fiscal year and in any event no later than
December 31, 2010 (the “2010 AGM”) 

 Agreed to: 

 

									
	BakBone Software, Inc.	 		 	VantagePoint Venture Partners IV (Q) L.P.
				
		 		 		 	By: VantagePoint Venture Associates IV.
		 		 		 	L.L.C., its General Partner
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Steve Martin
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Alan E. Salzman

	Name: Steve Martin	 		 	Name: Alan E. Salzman
	Title: SVP CFO + Interim CEO	 		 	Title: Managing Member
	Date: September 29, 2010	 		 	Date: September 29, 2010


  
 1 








  
 
			
	 VantagePoint Venture Partners Principals
 Fund IV, L.P.
  
 By:
VantagePoint, Venture Associates IV,
 L.L.C., Its General Partner



		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Alan E. Salzman

	 Name: Alan E. Salzman

	 Title: Managing Member

	 Date: September 29, 2010

	
	 VantagePoint Venture Partners IV, L.P.

 
 By: VantagePoint Venture Associates IV,

L.L.C., Its General Partner



		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Alan E. Salzman

	 Name: Alan E. Salzman

	 Title: Managing Member

	 Date: September 29, 2010




  
 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ohio State Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gary E. Pendleton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Gary E. Pendleton

Gary E. Pendleton
Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2004
----

(2004/C 65 E/285)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3172/03

by Caroline Jackson (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(27 October 2003)

Subject:   Fire safety in hotels

A consumer survey from May 2002 showed that 82 % of 80 hotels inspected were unsafe in the event of a fire, due to management faults (misuse of emergency stairwells for storing maintenance equipment, fire doors, fixed, open locking of emergency exit doors) and structural faults (single unprotected escape routes, lack of fire and smoke compartments, incomplete and unclear orientation/guidance systems).

As the Commission has recognised that not all Member States have implemented the recommendation on hotel fire safety, will the Commission, based on the consumer survey's findings, now finally proceed with a directive?

Has the Commission considered whether the proposed new legislative framework for ‘safety of services’ (1) could be applicable to hotels, and would this make the recommendation on hotel fire safety superfluous?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(20 November 2003)

The Commission is aware of the survey conducted in 80 hotels by consumer associations from five Member States. Although it was not based on Council Recommendation 86/666/EEC on fire safety in existing hotels (2), the Commission feels that it reinforces the analysis presented in its report on the application of Recommendation 86/666/EEC (3).

The Commission therefore intends to continue as follows, in accordance with the guidelines set out in this report:

In line with these guidelines, the Commission does not at this stage envisage submitting a proposal for a specific directive on this subject.

The Commission also considers it to be of the utmost importance to have, as far as possible, objective and full knowledge of the situation on the ground. To this end, it intends to complete its assessment of existing regulations in this area in the Member States and to compile an inventory of hotel fires in the Community between 1986 and 2003, including an analysis of their causes and consequences. These two measures will allow a better evaluation of risks, thus creating a stronger basis and a clearer course for Community action.

With regard to the discussions under way on a Community legal framework for service safety, it would be premature to speculate on its scope in relation to hotel fire safety. However, the Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the safety of services for consumers (4) makes it clear that tourism, leisure and sports activities will be priority sectors for the Community, and hotels will be included in this.

----

(1)  COM(2003) 313.

(2)OJ L 384, 31.12.1986.

(3)  COM(2001) 348 final.

(4)  COM(2003) 313 final.

----
ADCOX v. CLARKSON BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, et al.

No. 222P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

R. James Lore, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Adcox, Thomas F. (Employee).

Nicholas J. Dombalis, II, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Adcox, Thomas F. (Employee).

*557Kari L. Schultz, Wilmington, Attorney at Law, for Clarkson Brothers Construction Company, et al.

M. Duane Jones, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for Clarkson Brothers Construction Company, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1 st of July 2015 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

Beasley, J. recused.
STATE v. Tony Eugene HOWELL.

No. 436P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Tony Eugene Howell, Spruce Pine, for Howell, Tony Eugene.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

*608Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of December 2015 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Clifford K.
Bown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     i.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     ii.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Clifford K. Bown
-------------------------------------
Clifford K. Bown
Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2006
STATE v. CHERRY.

No. COA08-677.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Pitt (07CRS52627, 07CRS52628, 07CRS52629).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2369 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2369 of 26 November 2015 adopting a ninth update of the list of sites of Community            importance for the Continental biogeographical region (notified under document C(2015) 8191) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2369                     

# of 26 November 2015

# adopting a ninth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Continental biogeographical region

# *(notified under document C(2015) 8191)* (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2334 of 9 December 2016 adopting a tenth update of the list of sites of Community                                 importance for the Continental biogeographical region (notified under document C(2016) 8191).
----

(2004/C 65 E/231)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2781/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI), Marco Pannella (NI), Marco Cappato (NI), Benedetto Della Vedova (NI), Gianfranco Dell'Alba (NI) and Olivier Dupuis (NI) to the Commission

(17 September 2003)

Subject:   Violation of religious freedom in China — the Falun Gong

According to the Chinese national press agency Xin-Hua the government in Beijing intends to continue its campaign against the Falun Gong Movement, an organisation it calls ‘an evil cult’, which is ‘anti-social’ and ‘anti-scientific’.

The results of this ‘undertaking’ — made by the Beijing government and reiterated in this way — are as follows: 1 600 members of the Falun Gong movement tortured and beaten to death; 500 sentenced to more than twenty years' imprisonment, 1 000 interned in psychiatric institutions, 25 thousand undergoing ‘reeducation’ in labour camps and 100 000 detained without trial.

Can the Commission say:

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(22 October 2003)

The Commission thanks the Honourable Members for the information on the Chinese authorities’ policy towards the Falun Gong movement.

Respect for human rights is a cornerstone of EU foreign policy. The EU has therefore paid very close attention to the human rights situation in China, especially through the bilateral dialogue conducted with China since 1996. The freedoms of belief and association figure high on the agenda at these meetings. In its dealings with the Chinese authorities the EU has regularly raised cases of Falun Gong members prosecuted for practising their faith. The Commission is aware of the 1998 US International Religious Freedom Act. In its dealings with China, it will continue to use dialogue as the most appropriate means of putting across its position on the issue to the country's representatives.

----
1 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and reco mmendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-3402

___________ Dennis Larson Loop, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. United States of America; * United States Marshal’s Service, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 22, 2007 Filed: May 30, 2007

___________ Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Dennis Larson Loop appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Following careful de novo review, see Kasper v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co. , 425 F.3d 496, 502 (8th Cir. 2005), we affirm the grant of summary judgment, finding no reversible error of fact or law. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
# CE2004078EN.01045001.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/450 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/450

---

(2004/C 78 E/0473)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3153/03

by Evelyne Gebhardt (PSE) to the Commission

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   EU Info-Points

Subject:

At the end of September 2003, the Commission informed the EU information centres that from January 2004, under the new Financial Regulation, overheads will no longer be subsidised. This endangers the very existence of the Info-Points and information carrefours that have until now undeniably served citizens, the European Parliament and not least the European Commission well. These Info-Points are essential in building trust between the people of Europe and the European Union institutions.

| 1. | Why did this communication come so late and unexpectedly that those in charge of the Info-Points and carrefours were unable to make the necessary preparations for the new situation when planning their budget for 2004? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Why did this communication come so late and unexpectedly that those in charge of the Info-Points and carrefours were unable to make the necessary preparations for the new situation when planning their budget for 2004?

| 2. | Why was no arrangement made to guarantee the survival of these valuable Info-Points, even though the Financial Regulation the Commission is referring to has been in existence for over a year (since June 2002)? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Why was no arrangement made to guarantee the survival of these valuable Info-Points, even though the Financial Regulation the Commission is referring to has been in existence for over a year (since June 2002)?

| 3. | Is the Commission prepared to introduce transitional measures to ensure the uninterrupted service of Info-Points during 2004? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is the Commission prepared to introduce transitional measures to ensure the uninterrupted service of Info-Points during 2004?

| 4. | What steps does the Commission intend to take to guarantee the lasting survival of Info-Points and carrefours? |
| --- | --- |

4.

What steps does the Commission intend to take to guarantee the lasting survival of Info-Points and carrefours?

---