alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit102.htm


Exhibit 10.2







AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE


LOWE’S COMPANIES


 CASH DEFERRAL PLAN







 


THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO to the Lowe’s Companies Cash Deferral Plan, as adopted effective for the fiscal year that began January 31, 2004 (the “Plan”), is adopted by Lowe’s Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) effective as of the date specified herein.


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to (i) exclude terminated employees who are later rehired into qualifying positions from participating in the Plan until the first day of the Plan Year following the date of their rehire and (ii) revise the amendment provisions of the Plan in accordance with a revised Administrative Committee Charter;


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.           The last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan shall be amended to read as follows:


 


“Notwithstanding the foregoing, a person who would otherwise become eligible to participate in the Plan as a result of promotion within the Company or as a result of being rehired by the Company, shall not be eligible to participate in the Plan until the first day of the Plan Year following the date such promotion or rehire becomes effective.”


 


 


2.           The second sentence of the first paragraph of Section 15 which begins “Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may amend...” shall be deleted in its entirety.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment Number Two has been executed on the date shown below, effective as of August 19, 2010.


 







 


LOWE’S COMPANIES, INC.


 







 


By: _______________________________



	
  

	
Maureen K. Ausura








	
  

	
Senior Vice President – Human Resources












Date: ______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18135]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Colorado Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference 
call of the Colorado State Advisory Committee will convene at 9 a.m. 
(m.d.t.) and adjourn at 10 a.m. (m.d.t.), Friday, September 16, 2005. 
The purpose of the conference call is to provide a status report on the 
Commission and regional programs, and planning for future activities.
    This conference call is available to the public through the 
following call-in number: 1-800-473-7796; call-in ID<greek-i>: 4390-
5596. Any interested member of the public may call this number and 
listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls 
not initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines 
and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will 
incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line 
connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the 
proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-
8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and 
access code.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting John 
F. Dulles, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, (303) 866-1040 (TDD 303-866-
1049), by 3 p.m. (m.d.t.) on Monday, September 12, 2005.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, September 7, 2005.
Ivy L. Davis,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 05-18135 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Jessie Earl SIMPSON, Defendant.

No. COA14-1265.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Johnny WILLIAMS.

No. 169P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Jillian C. Katz, Assistant Appellant Defender, for Williams, Johnny.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 28th of May 2015 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Iron Eagle Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael J. Bovalino, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Michael J. Bovalino
-----------------------------
Michael J. Bovalino
Chief Executive Officer

October 13, 2010


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Iron Eagle Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Eric Hoffman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Eric Hoffman
-----------------------------
Eric Hoffman
Chief Financial Officer

October 13, 2010
NATIONAL R.R. MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME, INC. v. CITY OF HAMLET.

No. COA08-356.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Richmond (06CVS749).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-11240

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NOEL RICHARD SCHMITZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CR-396-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Noel Richard Schmitz has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Schmitz has not filed a response. Our independent review

of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. Emile George FRYOU.

No. 419P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Richard Croutharmel, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for Fryou, Emile George.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Robert S. Banks, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th of December 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                        552,751
<SECURITIES>                  0 
<RECEIVABLES>                 101,904
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              654,655
<PP&E>                        11,945,852
<DEPRECIATION>                (622,310)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                13,433,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         503,585
<BONDS>                       11,076,350
<COMMON>                      815,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   1,661,452
<OTHER-SE>                    (622,615)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 13,433,972
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,500,395
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              679,605
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1,033,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (212,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (212,672)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (212,672)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.34)
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Dwayne D. KNOLTON.

No. 425P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 22, 2015.

Dwayne D. Knolton, for Knolton, Dwayne D.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 22nd of December 2015 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Scotland County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of December 2015."
FERRELL v. PERRITT.

No. 407P14-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Dwain Cornelius Ferrell, for Ferrell, Dwain Cornelius.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of July 2015 by Defendant for Subpoena Duces Tecum:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# CE2004078EN.01042801.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/428 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/428

---

(2004/C 78 E/0447)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2789/03

by Eija-Riitta Korhola (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(19 September 2003)

Subject:   Banking rules in EU emissions trading: Member States' right to bank emission allowances

Subject:

Under Article 3(13) of the Kyoto Protocol, Parties may bank emission allowances from one period to the next. Under the EU emissions trading directive (not yet published in the Official Journal), decisions may be taken at national level regarding the possibility of banking to be afforded to operators.

Does the Commission consider that Member States are entitled to bank emission allowances which have not been allocated, even though the directive applies only to operators (plants)? Does it believe that Member States will already have that right during the time span covering the EU internal emissions trading period (2005-2007) and the first Kyoto period (2008-2012)?

Should the emissions trading directive be amended in order to bring it into line with the Kyoto Protocol?

---
#### In the Matter of Michael E. Plochocki, Appellant, v Onondaga County Board of Elections et al., Respondents.

[800 NYS2d 257]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John V Centra, J), entered August 9, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102. The order dismissed the petition with prejudice.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order dismissing his petition seeking to nullify respondents’ determination invalidating his designation as a candidate in the Republican primary election for the office of Onondaga County Legislator, Sixth District. Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition with prejudice based on the failure of petitioner to name and serve a necessary party, i.e., the objector to his designating petition. It is undisputed that petitioner received adequate and timely notice of the objector’s identity, and thus his failure to name the objector as a party renders this proceeding defective *(see Matter of Gadsen v Board of Elections of City of N.Y.,*57 NY2d 751 [1982]; *Matter of Wein v Molinari,*51 NY2d 717, 718-719 [1980]; *Matter of Giorgi v Monroe County Bd. of Elections,*
      *711198 AD2d 886 [1993]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.
EX-10.9
                                Letter Agreement




September 28, 2000


3220 Executive Ridge Drive
Suite 100
Vista, California 92083

         Re: Teletrac, Inc.

Dear Mr. Charles A. Scheiwe:

Reference is made to that certain employment agreement dated as of September 29,
1999 (the "Employment Agreement") between you and Teletrac, Inc. (the "Company")
regarding the term of your employment with the Company. This will confirm our
understanding that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.       Section 2 is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place:

         "2. Term of Employment. Unless earlier terminated as hereinafter
         provided, the term of the Employee's employment under this Agreement
         shall initially be for a period beginning on the Effective Date hereof
         and ending thirty-six months after the Effective Date. Thereafter, this
         Agreement will continue in full force and effect from year to year
         unless terminated by either the Employee or the Company by written
         notice given to the other not later than two months before the end of
         the year of such termination. The period from the date hereof until the
         date the Employee's employment hereunder is terminated (whether
         thirty-six months after the Effective Date or earlier or later as
         provided herein) is hereinafter called the "Employment Term."

2.       Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, nothing herein shall
         affect or be deemed to affect any provisions of the Employment
         Agreement, and except only to the extent that they may be varied
         hereby, all of the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain
         unchanged and in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and
         confirmed.


<PAGE>


If the foregoing correctly sets forth our understanding concerning this matter,
please sign below and return to us an executed copy of this letter, whereupon
this letter shall become a binding agreement between us.

Sincerely,

Teletrac, Inc.


By /s/ Steven D. Scheiwe
   ---------------------------------

Name:  Steven D. Scheiwe

Title: Chief Executive Officer





Accepted and agreed to as of the date written above.


/s/ Charles A. Scheiwe
-------------------------------------
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 29, 2008

Mr. R. Brent Cooper

Cooper & Scully, P.C.

900 Jackson Street, Suite 100

Dallas, TX 75202

Honorable  Nancy  A.  Thomas

160th Judicial District Court 

600 Commerce Street, Suite 640

Dallas, TX 75202

Mr. William M. Hayner Jr.

William M. Hayner & Associates

2929 Carlisle Street, Suite 220

Dallas, TX 75204

RE:Case Number:  06-0491

Court of Appeals Number:  05-05-01663-CV

Trial Court Number:  03-9170-H

Style:IN RE  BAYLOR MEDICAL CENTER AT GARLAND

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas abates this cause pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2 and issued the enclosed opinions in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0491Page 1**
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1)     The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  May 13, 2011 |  |  | BY:  ____________________________
RALPH M. AMATO
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
# CE2004088EN.01036801.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/368 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/368

---

(2004/C 88 E/0374)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1746/03

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(20 May 2003)

Subject:   Carrickmines Castle archeological finds

Subject:

Could the Commission please indicate the current position as regards its investigations into the Environmental Impact Assessment carried out under Directive 85/337/EEC (1) and, in particular, its failure to appraise the impact on the archaeological heritage of the Carrickmines site? Further to the Commission's answer to Oral Question H-0649/02 (2), will it please indicate when it expects to report on its investigation, bearing in mind the urgent nature of this situation, given the imminent destruction of this archaeological treasure?

1

2

Supplementary answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(5 April 2004)

(5 April 2004)

In July 2003, the Commission obtained its own expert opinion on the archaeological content of the environmental impact assessment carried out on the M50 motorway project pursuant to Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 (3). It sought comments from the Irish authorities on this, which it subsequently received. It has since provided the Honourable Member with a copy of both the expert opinion and the response of the Irish authorities.

3

---

(1)  OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p. 40.

1

(2)  Written reply dated 22 October 2002.

2

(3)  OJ L 73, 14.3.1997.

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         373,891                 373,891
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  288,047                 288,047
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    418,075                 418,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,080,013               1,080,013
<PP&E>                                      13,186,988              13,186,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,267,001              14,267,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,766,205              10,766,205
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        62,892                  62,892
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,500,796               3,500,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,267,001              14,267,001
<SALES>                                     15,367,640              15,367,640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,367,640              15,367,640
<CGS>                                        6,145,055               6,145,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,684,057              16,684,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             301,039                 301,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,617,456)             (1,617,456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   123,623                 123,623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,749,079               1,749,079
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,749,079               1,749,079
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.28)                  (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)                  (0.28)


</TABLE>