alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2216Show full title

Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2216 of 30 November 2015 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against            Iran         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2216                     

# of 30 November 2015

# amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing                           Common Position 2007/140/CFSP(1), and in particular Article 23 thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 July 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran.

(2)By its judgment of 18 September 2015 in Case T-121/13, the General Court of the European Union annulled the Council's decision                              to include Oil Industry Pension Fund Investment Company (OPIC) on the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive                              measures set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP.

(3)OPIC should be included again on the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures, on the basis of a new statement                              of reasons.

(4)Decision 2010/413/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 December 2015.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

J. Asselborn                            

## ANNEXU.K.

The entity listed below is inserted in the list set out in Part I of Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP:

### I.Persons and entities involved in nuclear or ballistic missile activities and persons and entities providing support to the                        Government of IranU.K.

#### B.EntitiesU.K.

1

OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 76 
          - [MB Docket No. 05-181; FCC 05-159] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission is correcting a Final Rule summary that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 31, 2005 (70 FR 51658). In this document, the Commission corrects paragraph (c)(6) of the 47 CFR 76.66.                     

# DATES:

Effective September 30, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For additional information on this proceeding, contact Eloise Gore,                         *Eloise.Gore@fcc.gov*                         of the Media Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418-2120.                     

# SUPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In FR Doc. 05-17324 published on August 31, 2005 (70 FR 51658), make the following correction. 

1. On page 51668, in the third column, the last sentence of paragraph (c)(6) is corrected to read as follows:

A noncommercial television broadcast station located in a local market in Alaska or Hawaii must request carriage by October 1, 2005, for carriage of its signal that originates as an analog signal for carriage commencing on December 8, 2005, and by April 1, 2007, for its signal that originates as a digital signal for carriage commencing on June 8, 2007 and ending on December 31, 2008.

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene Dortch,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-17794 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
STATE v. Walter LEMLEY, Jr.

No. 62P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Walter Lemley, Badin, for Lemley, Walter (Jr.).

Kristin Jo Uicker, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of February 2016 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# TIME AND DATE:

12:00 p.m., Monday, September 19, 2005.

# PLACE:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1.  Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2.  Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle A. Smith, Director, Office of Board Members; 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at                               ( print page 54387)                            approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                         *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                         for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 9, 2005.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 05-18303 Filed 9-9-05; 4:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 8.1



Subsidiaries of Industrias
Bachoco S.A.B. de C.V.



The following chart lists each of our subsidiaries which we
owned, directly or indirectly, as of December 31, 2015, and April 29, 2016:



| | 1. | Aviser, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | --------------------



| | 2. | Bachoco, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | ---------------------



| | 3. | Bachoco Comercial, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | -------------------------------



| | 4. | Campi Alimentos, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | -----------------------------



| | 5. | Operadora de Servicios de Personal, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------



| | 6. | PEC LAB, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | ---------------------



| | 7. | Secba, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | -------------------



| | 8. | Sepetec, S. A. de C.V.
| | -- | ----------------------



| | 9. | Servicios de Personal Administrativo, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------



| | 10. | Induba Pavos, S.A de C.V.
| | --- | -------------------------



| | 11. | Bachoco USA, LLC and Subsidiaries
| | --- | ---------------------------------



Each of the Subsidiaries listed is incorporated under the laws
of Mexico, except by Bachoco USA, LLC and Subsidiaries.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                              197149
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       744975
<ALLOWANCES>                                         70093
<INVENTORY>                                         606149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1565012
<PP&E>                                             3351167
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1709882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     3313933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1573247
<BONDS>                                             626195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         496236
<COMMON>                                             22131
<OTHER-SE>                                          456817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       3313933
<SALES>                                            5467341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   5467341
<CGS>                                              3368342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      3368342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   2228325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      4400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  158297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (129326)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (129326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (129,326)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.11)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2023304EN.01003101.xml

| 28.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/31

---

Action brought on 11 July 2023 — Ausnit, Olariu și Asociații v Commission

(Case T-397/23)

(2023/C 304/38)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Ausnit, Olariu și Asociații SRL (Lugoj, Romania) (represented by: F. Irimia, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul European Commission Decision C(2023) 3232 final of 10 May 2023. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul European Commission Decision C(2023) 3232 final of 10 May 2023.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law:

| 1. | The decision has no legal basis, having been adopted on the basis of an erroneous interpretation and application of the provisions of Article II.19.1.(f) of the grant agreement, in conjunction with Article 30 of Regulation No 966/2012 applicable to the agreement in accordance with Article 279(3) of Regulation No 1046/2018. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The decision has no legal basis, having been adopted on the basis of an erroneous interpretation and application of the provisions of Article II.19.1.(f) of the grant agreement, in conjunction with Article 30 of Regulation No 966/2012 applicable to the agreement in accordance with Article 279(3) of Regulation No 1046/2018.

| 2. | The contested decision was adopted in breach of the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 135 of Regulation No 966/2012, following the provisions of Article II.27.6 of the grant agreement, in breach of Article II.25.4 of that agreement and in breach of Article 5 TFEU and the provisions of Additional Protocol No 2. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The contested decision was adopted in breach of the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 135 of Regulation No 966/2012, following the provisions of Article II.27.6 of the grant agreement, in breach of Article II.25.4 of that agreement and in breach of Article 5 TFEU and the provisions of Additional Protocol No 2.

| 3. | The contested decision is contrary to the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The contested decision is contrary to the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 21, 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00125

- CV

L. R., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY

BEFORE JU STICES PURYEAR, PEMB ERTON, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment sign ed by the tr i a l court on February 13, 2018. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because

appella nt is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John R. Serino, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Encision Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.               The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including our consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              disclosed in thisreport any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting;

5.               The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting  whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Dated: | February 13, 2006. |
|--------|--------------------|
|   |               |
|   |               | /s/ John R. Serino |
|   |               |   |
|   |               | John R. Serino |
|   |               | Principal Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit (23)



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. of our report dated February 13, 2002,
included in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders of LaCrosse Footwear, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-77516, 33-77518 and 333-2702) pertaining to the LaCrosse
Footwear, Inc. Employees' Retirement Savings Plan, the LaCrosse Footwear, Inc.
Union Employees' Retirement Savings Plan and the LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. 1993
Employee Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated February 13, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by
reference, and our report dated February 13, 2002, with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LaCrosse
Footwear, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                                /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

                                                McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP



La Crosse, Wisconsin
March 29, 2002
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Universal Automotive
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Arvin Scott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Robert W. Zimmer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Arvin Scott
-------------------
Name: Arvin Scott
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: December 6, 2004

/s/ Robert W. Zimmer
-----------------------
Name: Robert W. Zimmer
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: December 6, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

See also the certification pursuant to Sec. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, which is also attached to this Report.

                                       17
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6760

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MORRIS EUGENE HAYES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (2:94-cr-00163-RBS-FBS)

Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 21, 2008

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris Eugene Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Morris Eugene Hayes appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2000), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Hayes, No. 2:94-cr-00163-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 9, 2008 &

entered May 5, 2008; entered Apr. 23, 2008 & filed Apr. 24, 2008).

We deny Hayes’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                      ORTHODONTIC CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), of Orthodontic Centers of America, Inc. (the
"Company"), I, Bartholomew F. Palmisano, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


August 14, 2003                             /s/   Bartholomew F. Palmisano, Sr.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Bartholomew F. Palmisano, Sr.
                                            Chairman of the Board, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer


This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability
pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.