alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCrown Pacific Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Steven E. Dietrich, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
| /s/ Steven E. Dietrich                             |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven E. Dietrich                                 |
| Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
| Crown Pacific Partners,  L.P.                      |
| May 20, 2003                                       |

 

This certification is made solely for thepurpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. andwill be retained by Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit
      21**





**Subsidiaries
      of On2 Technologies, Inc.**





Set
      forth
      is a list of the subsidiaries of On2 Technologies, Inc. as of December 31,
      2007
      and their respective jurisdictions of organization.





Name
                of Subsidiary
            
            JurisdictionThe
                Duck Corporation
            
            DelawareOn2
                Technologies (UK) Limited
            
            United
                KingdomHantro
                Products Oy*
            
            Finland





*
      Hantro
      Products Oy is a subsidiary of On2 Technologies (UK) Limited
Exhibit 10.16

Summary of Compensation for Named Executive Officers for Fiscal 2011

In
February 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors established 2011 salary and target bonus applicable to the named executive officers as follows:



|                  |  |                    |         |  |                     |  |         | 
|----------------- |  | ------------------ | ------- |  | ------------------- |  | ------- | 
|Named Executive   |  | 2011Base Salary($) |         |  | 2011Target Bonus($) | 
|Arthur G. Dauber  |  |                    | 120,000 |  |                     |  | 20,000  | 
|Frank R. Pierce   |  |                    | 168,000 |  |                     |  | 82,000  | 
|Neal T. Hare      |  |                    | 176,820 |  |                     |  | 82,500  | 
|James J. Steffek  |  |                    | 176,820 |  |                     |  | 82,500  | 
|Charles M. Dauber |  |                    | 240,000 |  |                     |  | 100,000 | 
|Timothy C. Adams  |  |                    | 150,000 |  |                     |  | 31,000  | 

Actual bonus amounts
payable to each executive will be based on the achievement of 2011 Company and individual performance goals established for each executive. Targeted performance must be achieved at the 75% level for that component of the bonus to be earned and must
be achieved at the 100% level for the full bonus to be earned. Some of each executives individual goals may require a subjective evaluation and judgment with respect to achievement of these goals. Company performance targets range from 50% to
75% of total bonus with individual goals encompassing the remainder.

In connection with the 2011 salary and target bonus
established for the named executive officers, the following named executive officers were awarded restricted stock units under the 2007 Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Each restricted stock unit is issued one share of common stock upon vesting:



|                  |  |                        |        | 
|----------------- |  | ---------------------- | ------ | 
|Named Executive   |  | Restricted Stock Units |       
|Frank R. Pierce   |  |                        | 7,500  | 
|Charles M. Dauber |  |                        | 50,000 | 
|Timothy C. Adams  |  |                        | 12,000 | 

Vesting of a portion
of such awards is subject to achievement of the 2011 Company and individual performance goals established for each executive, 9,600 for Mr. Adams, 14,000 for Mr. Dauber, and 6,000 for Mr. Pierce. The balance of such awards are subject
to only a continuing employment requirement. All vested restricted stock units convert into common stock on a one-to-one basis in four equal annual installments from the original grant date, subject to a continuing employment requirement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH 
31, 1997 FORM 10-Q OF JOHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          86,083
<SECURITIES>                                     1,689
<RECEIVABLES>                                  240,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,685
<INVENTORY>                                    114,117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               475,940
<PP&E>                                       1,404,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                 634,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,713,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          278,844
<BONDS>                                        564,506
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     339,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,713,748
<SALES>                                        379,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               379,010
<CGS>                                          278,354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   229
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,944
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,217
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,297
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,920
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,920
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Crystalee C. Orange County Department of Social Services, Appellant; Glen C., Respondent; Ellen B., Intervenor-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Jylissa C. Orange County Department of Social Services, Appellant; Glen C., Respondent; Ellen B., Intervenor-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[799 NYS2d 911]

In related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the petitioner and the intervenor separately appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), entered October 8, 2004, which, after a hearing, denied the petitions, and dismissed the proceedings.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The father provided sufficient evidence that he was unable to comply with the subject dispositional order due to financial hardship *(cf. Matter of Christina Q.,*156 AD2d 770, 774 [1989]). Adams, J.P., Krausman, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00025-CR

James Timothy Brinson Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-06-762, HONORABLE WILLIAM HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant James Timothy Brinson, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s judgment of

conviction. The record does not contain the trial court’s certification of Brinson’s right of appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). Rule 25.2(a)(2) states: “The trial court shall enter a certification

of the defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.”

Id. The appeal is therefore abated and the trial court is ordered to prepare and file its certification

of Brinson’s right of appeal as required by rule 25.2(a)(2). A supplemental clerk’s record containing

the court’s certification shall be tendered for filing no later than thirty days from the date of this

opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 34.5(c)(2), 37.1.
2

___________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Abated

Filed: August 28, 2008

Do Not Publish
John MILLIGAN, Employee, Plaintiff, v. WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY SCHOOLS, N.C. Department of Public Instruction, Employer, Self-Insured (Corvel, Third-Party Administrator), Defendants.

No. COA15-231.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
#### Susan Wolf, Respondent, v The Steer et al., Appellants.

[801 NYS2d 184]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (David J. Mahoney, J.), entered October 29, 2004 in a personal injury action. The order denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting the motion in part and dismissing the complaint, as amplified by the bill of particulars, insofar as it alleges that defendants had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries she sustained when she allegedly slipped and fell on ice outside, defendant The Steer, a restaurant. We conclude that Supreme Court should have granted that part of defendants’ motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as plaintiff alleges that defendants had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition *(see Quinn v Holiday Health & Fitness Ctrs. of N.Y., Inc.,*15 AD3d 857 [2005]; *Anthony v Wegmans Food Mkts., Inc.,*11 AD3d 953, 954 [2004]; *Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc.,*297 AD2d 277 [2002]; *see generally Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836 [1986]), and we therefore modify the order accordingly. We further conclude, however, that the court properly denied that part of the motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as plaintiff alleges that defendants created the dangerous condition, i.e., “by piling *1349snow that melted, ran onto the [area where plaintiff fell], and thereafter froze” *(Feeney v Benderson Dev. Co.,*255 AD2d 965, 966 [1998]; *see Rotella v Wegmans Food Mkts.,*289 AD2d 1014 [2001]; *Calabrese v Geneva Hous. Auth.,*284 AD2d 954 [2001]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J, Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.
# CE2004078EN.01050701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/507 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/507

---

(2004/C 78 E/0527)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3276/03

by Brian Simpson (PSE) to the Commission

(5 November 2003)

Subject:   Restrictions imposed on flights into Zurich airport

Subject:

Can the Commission indicate when it will be in a position to report on the complaint submitted by the airline company Swiss against the German authorities in regard to restrictions imposed by them for flights into Zurich airport?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(19 December 2003)

(19 December 2003)

The Commission has indeed received a complaint from the Swiss authorities regarding German measures which could affect certain landing procedures at Zurich airport. The complaint has been examined on the basis of the agreement concluded between the Community and Switzerland, and on 5 December 2003 the Commission has reached a decision on it in accordance with the procedures laid down in the Agreement and in Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 (1). This decision finds that Germany may continue to apply the 213th regulation for the implementation of German Air Traffic Regulations establishing procedures for instrument-guided landings and takeoffs at Zurich airport as amended by the first amending regulation of 4 April 2003. The Decision of the Commission will be published in the Official Journal in the near future.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes, OJ L 240, 24.8.1992.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Adam TURBYFILL.

No. 338P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Mark L. Hayes, Greensboro, for Turbyfill, Christopher Adam.

Matthew Boyatt, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Todd Williams, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of October 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                         215,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,191,369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,671,592
<PP&E>                                       3,062,482
<DEPRECIATION>                                 543,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,224,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,018,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,181
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,538,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,224,413
<SALES>                                      3,796,111
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,824,842
<CGS>                                        1,988,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,988,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,133,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,393,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,393,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,393,744)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.62)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR
THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000930817
<NAME> PL BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Apr-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Aug-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         14,893
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  492,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    358,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               874,323
<PP&E>                                         192,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                 606,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,067,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          951,078
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,143
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,941)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,067,525
<SALES>                                        1,405,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,405,255
<CGS>                                          1,238,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,159
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (33,274)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (787)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2005-22204.                 

*Date Filed:*                     August 22, 2005.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*

Mail Vote 452—Resolution 010s; 

TC3 Japan, Korea-South East Asia; 

Special Passenger Amending Resolution between China (excluding Hong Kong SAR and Macao SAR) and Japan. 

*Intended effective date:*                     1 September 2005.                

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2005-22205.                 

*Date Filed:*                     August 22, 2005.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*

Composite Expedited Resolution 002ad (Memo 1260); 

Composite Expedited Resolution 024e (Memo 1261); 

Composite Expedited Resolutions 017b and 017c (Memo 1262). 

*Intended effective date:*                     1 October 2005.                 

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 05-18332 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
STATE v. Marvin Wade MILLSAPS.

No. 374P13-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Barry H. Bloch, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Marvin W. Millsaps, Norlina, for Millsaps, Marvin Wade.

Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of July 2015 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                   <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>         3-MOS                  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                              6,504,921
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                       3,375,976  
<ALLOWANCES>                          120,000
<INVENTORY>                         4,962,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   15,513,300
<PP&E>                                597,567
<DEPRECIATION>                        291,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        302,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               6,233,560
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                               44,723
<OTHER-SE>                          9,400,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        9,447,907
<SALES>                             9,575,745
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    9,575,745
<CGS>                               7,235,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       1,696,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       10,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       744,894
<INCOME-TAX>                          245,815
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          499,079
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.11
        

</TABLE>
IN THE MATTER OF: R.C.O., J.R.H., JR., & N.C.H.

No. COA15-961.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Jan. 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.