alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004078EN.01011701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/117 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/117

---

(2004/C 78 E/0118)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2481/03

by Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(24 July 2003)

Subject:   Transferable fishing quotas

Subject:

When appearing before Parliament's Committee on Fisheries on 10 June 2003, Commissioner Fischler announced that the Commission would put forward a working paper on transferable fishing quotas in Community waters before the end of the year.

Given this document's importance for the future CFP:

| 1. | Can the Commission provide more information on the matter? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can the Commission provide more information on the matter?

| 2. | Can it now give more precise dates for when the document might be available? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Can it now give more precise dates for when the document might be available?

| 3. | Is the Commission considering its possible application in all the various fisheries, zones and fleets? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is the Commission considering its possible application in all the various fisheries, zones and fleets?

| 4. | Will the Commission act on the suggestion made in Parliament and start introducing transferable quotas by means of experimental or pilot projects? |
| --- | --- |

4.

Will the Commission act on the suggestion made in Parliament and start introducing transferable quotas by means of experimental or pilot projects?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(10 September 2003)

(10 September 2003)

In its Communication on reform of the CFP (1) the Commission states its intention of examining the economic aspects of fisheries management in the Union and to that end organising workshops with the stakeholders in economic management and presenting a reflection paper looking in particular at the question of individual and transferable fishing rights.

1

At the moment the Commission is engaged in consulting all stakeholders so that they can make their experiences known to it. Widely varying management systems have been tried in Europe and elsewhere in the world, individual fisheries are very diverse in nature and the constraints under which they operate are not often comparable. Since the Commission wants discussion to be as wide, full and open as possible and this year's calendar is already very heavily laden it appears necessary to defer the report to 2004.

The Commission's primary wish for its report on the economics of fishery management is that it should contribute to the stakeholders' reflections. It has no intention of advocating the use of any particular management system. Its responsibility is to propose annual catch rates (total allowable catches) and quotas but it has no authority to allocate these within countries or regions or to decide that experimental or pilot projects for transferable quota systems should be run within Member States.

---

(1)  Commission Communication to the Council and Parliament on reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (‘Roadmap’) COM(2002)181 final.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Raymond Denard GAMBLE.

No. 196P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Raymond D. Gamble, Pro Se.

LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 21st day of April 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
52484 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Notices 

granted and fully abandoned the line. If 

consummation has not been effected by 

KCSR’s filing of a notice of 

consummation by September 2, 2006, 

and there are no legal or regulatory 

barriers to consummation, the authority 

to abandon will automatically expire. 

Board decisions and notices are 

available on our Web site at http:// 

www.stb.dot.gov. 

Decided: August 24, 2005. 

By the Board, David M. Konschnik, 

Director, Office of Proceedings. 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05–17235 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

United States Mint 

Notification of Citizens Coinage 

Advisory Committee September 2005 

Public Meeting 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to United States 

Code, Title 31, section 5135(b)(8)(C), the 

United States Mint announces the 

Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee 

(CCAC) public meeting scheduled for 

September 27, 2005, at United States 

Mint Headquarters in Washington, DC. 

The purpose of this meeting is to advise 

the Secretary of the Treasury on themes 

and designs pertaining to the coinage of 

the United States and for other 

purposes. 

Date: September 27, 2005. 

Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. 

Location: The United States Mint; 801 

9th Street, NW.; Washington, DC; 2nd 

floor. 

Subject: Review design candidates for 

the Jamestown 400th Anniversary 

Commemorative Coin Program, the Dr. 

Martin Luther King and Coretta Scott 

King Congressional Gold Medal, and 

other business. 

Interested persons should call 202–

354–7502 for the latest update on 

meeting time and room location. 

The CCAC was established to: 

• Advise the Secretary of the 

Treasury on any theme or design 

proposals relating to circulating coinage, 

bullion coinage, Congressional Gold 

Medals, and national and other medals. 

• Advise the Secretary of the 

Treasury with regard to the events, 

persons, or places to be commemorated 

by the issuance of commemorative coins 

in each of the five calendar years 

succeeding the year in which a 

commemorative coin designation is 

made. 

• Make recommendations with 

respect to the mintage level for any 

commemorative coin recommended. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Madelyn Simmons Marchessault, 

United States Mint Liaison to the CCAC; 

801 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC 

20220; or call 202–354–7200. 

Any member of the public interested 

in submitting matters for the CCAC’s 

consideration or addressing the CCAC is 

invited to submit the request and/or 

materials by fax to the following 

number: 202–756–6830. 

Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5135(b)(8)(C) 

Dated: August 25, 2005. 

David Lebryk, 

Acting Director, United States Mint. 

[FR Doc. 05–17474 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–37–P
Exhibit 99.25
 CONSENT OF C. CARR
   1.
    
    The technical report dated May 1, 2008 entitled Pueblo Viejo Gold
Project, Dominican Republic Technical Report (the Pueblo Viejo
Report); and2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection
with information relating to the Pueblo Viejo Report and the Pueblo
Viejo Project, and the properties described therein.
  /s/ Christopher A. CarrName:
    Christopher A. Carr, P. Eng.Title:
    Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Rescan Environmental Services Ltd.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NACO Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter  Ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Verne E. Bray,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Verne E. Bray
----------------------------
Verne E. Bray
Chief Executive Officer
July 13, 2004

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 2002, as amended.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 17, 2020

NO. 03-20-00074-CV

Texas Education Agency, and Mike Morath in his

Official Capacity as Commissioner of Education, Appellants

v.

Shepherd Independent School District, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

DISMISSED ON JOINT MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on January 9, 2020, denying 

defendants’ plea to the jurisdiction. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, 

and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be granted. 

Therefore, the Court grants the motion; vacates the trial court’s January 9, 2020 order denying 

defendants’ plea to the jurisdiction; vacates this Court’s March 9, 2020 temporary order; orders 

the release of the bond posted by appellee in conjunction with this matter; and dismisses the 

case. The Court further orders that each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by that 

party, both in this Court and in the court below.
499 S.E.2d 591

#### USAIR, INC. and Reliance National Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Robert S. JOYCE, Appellee.

Record No. 0357-97-4.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

June 2, 1998.

*476Before the Full Court.

UPON A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On May 1, 1998 came the appellants, by counsel, and filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on April 21, 1998, and grant a rehearing en banc thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing en banc is granted, the mandate entered herein on April 21, 1998 is stayed pending the decision of the Court en banc, and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. It is further ordered that the appellants shall file with the clerk of this Court ten additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30790

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SAMUEL LEE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:02-CR-60

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

SamuelLee,federal prisoner # 27842-034, appeals the denial of his motion

for inspection of the minutes of the grand jury proceedings in his criminal case.

Lee was indicted by the grand jury for, and ultimately convicted of, extortion and

conspiracy to commit extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371,

1951(a). Lee contends that he needs access to the grand jury minutes to prove

that witnesses who appeared before the grand jury perjured themselves.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-30790

2

However, Lee does not brief any argument challenging the district court’s

basis for denying the motion—specifically, that the district court lacked

jurisdiction to entertain the motion. Lee has thus abandoned any challenge to

the district court’s denial of his motion, see Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222,

224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813

F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987), and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
----

----

| Earnings to Fixed Charges          |     |     |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------|----------|----------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                               |     |     |   |   |   |   |
|                               | 10/1/05- | 2/17/06- |   |   |   |   |
|                               | 2/16/06  | 09/30/06 | 2007   | 2008   | 2009   | 2010   |
| Earnings:                          |     |     |   |   |   |   |
| Income (loss) before taxes         | 19       | -51      | -208   | -150   | -28    | -89    |
| Interest                           | 8        | 47       | 238    | 262    | 245    | 232    |
| Interest portion of rental expense | 1        | 2        | 15     | 19     | 19     | 19     |
|                               | 28       | -2       | 45     | 131    | 235    | 162    |
|                               |     |     |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed Charges:                     |     |     |   |   |   |   |
| Interest                           | 8        | 47       | 238    | 262    | 245    | 232    |
| Interest capitalized               | 0        | -1       | -2     | -2     | -2     | -2     |
| Interest portion of rental expense | 1        | 2        | 15     | 19     | 19     | 19     |
|                               | 8        | 48       | 251    | 279    | 261    | 249    |
|                               |     |     |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio                              | 3.3      | 0.0      | 0.2    | 0.5    | 0.9    | 0.7    |
|                               |     |     |   |   |   |   |
| Shortfall (overage)                | -19      | 51       | 206    | 148    | 26     | 87     |
|                               |     |     |   |   |   |   |

----
# CE2004078EN.01045102.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/451 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/451

---

(2004/C 78 E/0476)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3287/03

by Brice Hortefeux (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(5 November 2003)

Subject:   Europe Houses

Subject:

The concept of democratic deficit is used mainly to highlight how the European Union suffers from a lack of democracy and appears inaccessible to citizens as a result of the complex way in which it functions. It conveys the feeling that the Community's institutional system is still rather opaque to the uninitiated.

One of the tasks assigned to the Europe Houses on their founding was to dissipate this idea of the distance and inaccessibility of the Community's institutions. Their primary aim was to strive to bring the European people and the institutions closer together by providing information and removing the air of mystery surrounding the working of the Community.

It cannot be denied that, in this sense, they perform this role most worthily on a daily basis, displaying competence and energy. I was all the more amazed to discover, therefore, that the Commission is preparing simply to withdraw their operating grant for 2004, with notice given on 29 September. Aside from the organisational difficulties this cut will bring (particularly with regard to the employment of convinced young Europeans who have invested for years in this great enterprise), thought must also be given to the impact on the European Union's image. As the EU debates its future Constitution (and the procedures for its entry into force) and prepares to welcome 10 new members (whose accession is sometimes a cause of worry among citizens) and Europeans are called upon once again to express their opinions in the European elections next June (and we are all aware of how difficult it is to persuade voters to take part in this ballot), the European Commission is suddenly washing its hands of the EU's largest information network in the Member States.

As the reasons behind this decision are difficult to grasp, can the Commission shed some light on the matter?

---
110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 743

AN ACT

To amend title 36, United States Code, to modify the individuals eligible for associate membership in the Military

Order of the Purple Heart of the United States of America, Incorporated.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

•S 743 ES

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR

2 ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN MILITARY

3 ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART OF THE

4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INCOR5 PORATED.

6 Section 140503(b) of title 36, United States Code,

7 is amended by inserting ‘‘, spouses, siblings,’’ after ‘‘par8 ents’’.

Passed the Senate March 1, 2007.

Attest:

Secretary.

110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 743

AN ACT

To amend title 36, United States Code, to modify

United States of America, Incorporated.in the Military Order of the Purple Heart of thethe individuals eligible for associate membership
##### 



|                                     |  |                                                                                                                         |  |              
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|(Quintiles Transnational Corp. Logo) |  | Quintiles Transnational Corp,Post Office Box 13979
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3979919 998 2000 / Fax 919 998 9113 |  | EXHIBIT 10.19
|                                     |  | http://www.quintiles.com                                                                                                |  |              

November 13, 2003

Ron Wooten
c/o Quintiles Transnational Corp.
4709 Creekstone Drive
Riverbirch Building, Suite 300
Durham, NC 27703

Re: Amendment to Executive Employment
Agreement Dear Ron:

Reference is made to the amendment to your Executive Employment Agreement
dated as of November 12, 2003 (the Amendment). This will confirm our
agreement that in lieu of the calculation of the 36 monthly severance
payments in the manner specified in paragraph 4 of the Amendment, each such
monthly payment will instead equal your monthly rate of base salary in effect
at the time of your termination of employment, multiplied by 1.55.

All other terms of the Executive Employment Agreement, as amended by the
Amendment, are unaffected by this letter, including the conditions that must
be met to receive or retain severance benefits.

Please confirm that this conforms to your understanding of our agreement by
signing below.

Sincerely yours,

-s- Michael Mortimer

Michael Mortimer
Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources

Agreed to and Accepted by:

|               |  |         
|-------------- |  | --------
|-s- Ron Wooten |  | 11/14/03
|               |  |         
|Ron Wooten     |  | Date
STATE of North Carolina v. XAY VANG, Defendant.

No. COA15-1069.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
# CE2004088EN.01064801.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/648 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/648

---

(2004/C 88 E/0664)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3391/03

by Luigi Vinci (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(10 November 2003)

Subject:   Negotiations between Turkey and the Commission on the case against Leyla Zana

Subject:

A recent article by the Brussels correspondent of the Turkish daily newspaper Hurriyet mentions negotiations between Turkey and the European Commission based on the Turkish proposal for a favourable judgment in the case against Leyla Zana in exchange for the inclusion of KADEK on Europe's list of terrorist organisations.

Can the Commission either confirm this report or officially deny it?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(5 December 2003)

(5 December 2003)

The Commission would like to inform the Honourable Member that the article referred to has no basis in fact. There are no negotiations between the Commission and the Turkish Government on the subjects mentioned in the question.

The Commission provided its assessment of the ongoing re-trial in the Sadak, Zana, Dicle and Dogan case in its 2003 Regular Report, which was published on 5 November 2003 (1), and will continue to monitor this closely.

1

---

(1)  COM(2003) 676 final.

1

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 11

- 00786

- CR

MICKEY BOSWELL

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On a ppeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 10

- CR

- 4228

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 24, 2015.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and the information  contained in such report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


November 14, 2008                                       November 14, 2008


/s/ Jeffrey L. Minch                                    /s/ Richard S. Chilinski
Jeffrey L. Minch,                                       Richard S. Chilinski,
President and Chief Executive Officer                   Chief Financial Officer


                                       27
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 6, 2005



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 6, 2005