alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERALL-AMERICAN SPORTPARK, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of All-American SportPark, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009:

(1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of All-American SportPark, Inc.

Dated: May 15, 2009

/s/ Ronald S. Boreta
 Ronald S. Boreta Chief Executive
 Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 and Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to All-American SportPark, Inc. and will be retained by All -American SportPark, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

1

---
STATE v. WAGNER.

No. COA08-240.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS36461, 06CRS57682).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of independent accountants




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registation Statement of
Applied Digital Access, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated January 23, 1998
on our audits of the financial statements and financial statement schedule of
Applied Digital Access, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the
years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Applied Digital Access, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1997.




COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

San Diego, California
March 31, 1998
STATE of North Carolina v. Marvin J. COVINGTON.

No. 458P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Marvin J. Covington, Pro Se.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd day of October 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
STATE v. Mario Andrette McNEILL.

No. 446A13-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 26, 2015.

Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, Andrew DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, for McNeill, Mario Andrette.

*77Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, William West, District Attorney, William West, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of June 2015 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of June 2015."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 28th day of August 2015 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12.
In the matter of S.V.C., S.D.C., P.R.C., K.L.C., T.C.

No. COA15-359.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 6, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 440/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 440/2014 of 29 April 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 440/2014                     

# of 29 April 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 759 

To prohibit the use of funds for military operations in Iran. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2007 

Mr. WEBB introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds for military operations in Iran. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR MILI4 TARY OPERATIONS IN IRAN. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, no funds appropriated or otherwise made 

7 available by any Act, including any Act enacted after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, may be obligated or 

9 expended for military operations or activities within or 

10 above the territory of Iran, or within the territorial waters 

11 of Iran, except pursuant to a specific authorization of ConVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:07 Mar 07, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S759.IS S759

hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 759 IS

1 gress enacted in a statute enacted after the date of the 

2 enactment of this Act. 

3 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—The prohibition in subsection (a) 

4 shall not apply with respect to military operations or ac5 tivities as follows: 

6 (1) Military operations or activities to directly 

7 repel an attack launched from within the territory of 

8 Iran. 

9 (2) Military operations or activities to directly 

10 thwart an imminent attack to be launched from 

11 within the territory of Iran. 

12 (3) Military operations or activities in hot pur13 suit of forces engaged outside the territory of Iran 

14 who thereafter enter into Iran. 

15 (4) Military operations or activities connected 

16 with the intelligence or intelligence-related activities 

17 of the United States Government. 

18 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 24 hours after deter19 mining to utilize funds referred to in subsection (a) for 

20 purposes of a military operation described in subsection 

21 (b), the President shall submit to the appropriate commit22 tees of Congress a report on the determination, including 

23 a justification for the determination. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•S 759 IS

1 (d) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DE2 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate commit3 tees of Congress’’ means— 

4 (1) the Committees on Armed Services and 

5 Foreign Relations and the Select Committee on In6 telligence of the Senate; and 

7 (2) the Committees on Armed Services and 

8 Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Com9 mittee on Intelligence of the House of Representa10 tives. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LIN
TELEVISION CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH LIN TELEVISION
CORPORATION'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q-JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,952
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,105
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,881
<PP&E>                                         171,896
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,857
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           298
<OTHER-SE>                                     162,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586,111
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,967
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   509
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,497
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Michael Ray KING.

No. 190P13-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Michael Ray King, Bunn, for King, Michael Ray.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Todd Williams, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of September 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

FURNISHED PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. 1350)



I, Bernard Liautaud, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Business Objects S.A. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Business Objects S.A.



|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2003 |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |
----

INTERMEC,INC.

SUBSIDIARIES OF THEREGISTRANT

| Name of      Subsidiary                                 |   |                |   | Jurisdiction of      Incorporation |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
| Intermec      Technologies Corporation                  |   | WASHINGTON          |
| Intermec      Technologies de México, S.A. de C.V. |   | MEXICO              |
| Infolink      Group Limited                             |   | AUSTRALIA           |
| Intermec      Technologies Australia Pty. Limited       |   | AUSTRALIA           |
| Intermec      International Inc.                        |   | WASHINGTON          |
| Intermec      Technologies Holdings B.V.                |   | NETHERLANDS         |
| Intermec      International B.V.                        |   | NETHERLANDS         |
| Intermec      AB                                        |   | SWEDEN              |
| Intermec      Printer AB                                |   | SWEDEN              |
| Intermec      Technologies AB                           |   | SWEDEN              |
| Intermec      Technologies A/S                          |   | DENMARK             |
| ITC      Intermec Technologies Corporation AS           |   | NORWAY              |
| Intermec      Technologies (S) Pte Ltd             |   | SINGAPORE           |
| Intermec      Scanner Technology Center S.A.S           |   | FRANCE              |
| Intermec      Technologies Manufacturing LLC            |   | WASHINGTON          |
| Intermec      IP Corp.                                  |   | DELAWARE            |
| Intermec      Label Products B.V.                       |   | NETHERLANDS         |
| Intermec      (South America) Ltda.                     |   | BRAZIL              |
| Intermec      Technologies Canada Ltd.                  |   | CANADA              |
| Intermec      Technologies Benelux B.V.                 |   | NETHERLANDS         |
| Intermec      Technologies GmbH                         |   | GERMANY             |
| Intermec      Technologies S.r.l.                       |   | ITALY               |
| Intermec      Technologies U.K. Limited                 |   | UNITED      KINGDOM |
| Intermec      Technologies S.A.S.                       |   | FRANCE              |
| Intermec      Technologies, S.A.                        |   | SPAIN               |
| Intermec      Europe Limited                            |   | UNITED      KINGDOM |

----
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. BB & R, LLC; Kenneth W. Fromknecht, II, Trustee; Andy Berry & Sons, Inc.; United Community Bank (Georgia); Marcia J. Ringle, Trustee; and Macon Bank, Inc.

No. 285P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of August 2015 by Defendants (BB & R, LLC and Andy Beryy & Sons, Inc.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
# CE2004070EN.01004701.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/47

---

(2004/C 70 E/050)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1491/03

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(2 May 2003)

Subject:   Article 10 challenges

Subject:

Specifying the individual complaints and the EU directives or regulations concerned, could the Commission indicate how many letters of formal notice and reasoned opinions have been issued against Ireland under Article 10 of the EC Treaty since 1 May 1999?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(16 June 2003)

(16 June 2003)

Since 1 May 1999 and further to the Commission's reply to the Honourable Member's oral question H-0256/03 during question time at Parliament's May 2003 session (1), two letters of formal notice were sent on 15 May 2003 against Ireland under Article 226 of the EC Treaty.

1

The infringement procedures have been launched further to Commission investigations under its own initiative and not following individual complaints.

---

(1)  Written reply, 13.5.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-QSB
for  the  period  ended September 30, 2007,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., the Managing General Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., each certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 9, 2007



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 9, 2007
# CE2004078EN.01076501.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/765 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/765

---

(2004/C 78 E/0814)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2917/03

by Gabriele Stauner (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(2 October 2003)

Subject:   2 SDA, Camire, Marcom, World Systems, Ariane II Group and Sema Belgium

Subject:

Can the Commission provide a record for each Directorate-General of the provision of services by the six companies 2 SDA, Camire, Marcom, World Systems, Ariane II Group and Sema Belgium, including the following information:

| — | a list of all the contracts concluded with these firms over the last 10 years, with details of each respective contract volume and the procedure by which the contracts were awarded to these firms; |
| --- | --- |

—

a list of all the contracts concluded with these firms over the last 10 years, with details of each respective contract volume and the procedure by which the contracts were awarded to these firms;

| — | the volume of the individual payments to these companies? |
| --- | --- |

—

the volume of the individual payments to these companies?

Answer given by Ms Schreyer on behalf of the Commission

(15 October 2003)

(15 October 2003)

The Commission is compiling the information it needs to reply to the Honourable Member's question. It will report on its findings as soon as possible.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 31, 2018

No. 04-18-00037-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A.S, JR, B.R.S, AND R.C.S, CHILDREN,

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-14-0000351

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 18, 2017, appellant Deborah Silva was held in contempt for violating certain 

provisions of a trial court order. On January 19, 2018, appellant filed a notice of appeal seeking 

to appeal the trial court’s order of contempt. 

This court does not have jurisdiction to review contempt orders by direct appeal. See, 

e.g., Norman v. Norman, 692 S.W.2d 655, 655 (Tex. 1985); Chavira v. Quarry Hills Mgmt., 

LLC, 458 S.W.3d 561, 565–66 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2014, pet. denied). Contempt orders may 

only be reviewed by an application for a writ of habeas corpus, if the contemnor has been 

confined, or by a petition for a writ of mandamus, if the contemnor has not been confined. See 

Rosser v. Squier, 902 S.W.2d 962, 962 (Tex. 1995); Ex parte Williams, 690 S.W.2d 243, 243 n.1 

(Tex. 1985); Chavira, 458 S.W.3d at 566. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause 

in writing within two weeks from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed 

for lack of jurisdiction. See Rosser, 902 S.W.2d at 962; Chavira, 458 S.W.3d at 566. All 

appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of January, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court