alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Peter Papano, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|                                  
|/s/ PETER PAPANO                  
|Peter Papano                      
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

November 3, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     Electric  Lightwave,  Inc.'s  Financial  Statements  for  the  years  ended
     December 31, 1997 and 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
     such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997    Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997    Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997    Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1              1
<CASH>                                         26,531         611
<SECURITIES>                                   0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,138         5,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,569          1,166
<INVENTORY>                                    0              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               47,632         13,774
<PP&E>                                         328,664        189,334
<DEPRECIATION>                                 25,791         17,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 359,962        195,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          57,419         23,714
<BONDS>                                        70,511         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0              0
<PREFERRED>                                    0              0
<COMMON>                                       497            412
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,817        8,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   359,962        195,656
<SALES>                                        0              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               61,084         31,309
<CGS>                                          0              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  29,546         20,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,615         7,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,166          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (35,261)       (29,383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,316)        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (33,945)       (29,383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0              0
<CHANGES>                                      0              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (33,945)       (29,383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.80)          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.80)          0<F1>

<FN>
EPS for 1996 is not presented because the amounts are not meaningful.
</FN>


        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Keyshawn JONES.

No. 27P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 26, 2016.

John F. Carella, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Jones, Keyshawn.

Rajeev K. Premakumar, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Matthew Delbridge, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th of January 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th of January 2016."
Exhibit 10-s-1


 


NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION SUMMARY


 


Our
non-employee directors receive a retainer at the rate of $100,000 per year for
service on our board of directors, payable in cash (in quarterly installments
of $25,000 at the beginning of each quarter). 
This structure is effective November 19, 2010, for existing
directors and is effective upon appointment for any new director (prorated as
appropriate).


 


Under
the 2006 Long-Term Incentives Plan, which has been approved by our shareowners
and amended by the Board of Directors (the “Plan”), each director has the
option each year to determine whether to defer all or any part of the cash
portion of his or her retainer by electing to receive additional restricted
stock units of our common stock valued at the Fair Market Value (as defined in
the Plan) on the date the cash portion of the retainer payment would otherwise
be paid.


 


Under
the Plan, each non-employee director upon election as a director is granted an
award of restricted stock units of our common stock determined by dividing
$200,000 by the Fair Market Value on the date of such initial appointment.  In addition, each non-employee director is
granted an award of restricted stock units of our common stock on an annual
basis immediately after each annual meeting of our shareowners beginning with
the shareowners’ meeting following the first anniversary of Board service.  Such award is determined by dividing $100,000
by the Fair Market Value on the date of the shareowners’ annual meeting.


 


An
Audit Committee annual fee is paid to the Audit Committee Chair at a fixed
annual rate of $10,000 and the other Audit Committee members (excluding the
Chair) at a fixed rate of $5,000 each to be paid in cash (quarterly in
advance).  Each Audit Committee member
(including the Chair) has the option each year to determine whether to defer
all or any part of his


 

















 


or
her Audit Committee annual fee by electing to receive additional restricted
stock units of our common stock valued at the Fair Market Value on the date the
cash retainer payment would otherwise be paid.


 


An
annual fee is paid to the Compensation Committee Chair at a fixed annual rate
of $10,000, an annual fee is paid to the Board Nominating and Governance
Committee Chair at a fixed annual rate of $5,000 and an annual fee is paid to
the Technology Committee Chair at a fixed annual rate of $5,000, each to be
paid in cash (quarterly in advance). 
Each of these Committee Chairs has the option each year to determine whether
to defer all or any part of his or her annual fee by electing to receive
additional restricted stock units of our common stock valued at the Fair Market
Value on the date the cash retainer payment would otherwise be paid.
d. Maintenance. Lessor hereby represents to Lessee that, to Lessor’s actualknowledge, Lessee is not currently in default under the Lease with respect to its obligations tomaintain the Premises.**2. Capitalized Terms.**     All capitalized terms used in this Amendment, which are not defined herein, shall have thesame meaning as in the Lease.**3. Miscellaneous.**     Except as set forth herein, the Lease remains in full force and effect. This Amendment may beexecuted in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. Delivery of anexecuted signature page to this Amendment by facsimile transmission shall be as effective asdelivery of a manually signed counterpart hereto.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have executed this Second Amendment to Lease as of the datefirst set forth above.       **LESSEE** **LESSOR**       LACROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC., JEPCO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC,a Wisconsin corporation an Oregon limited liability company       By: /s/ David P. Carlson  By: /s/ Carol F. Herman & John H.Herman  Name: David P. Carlson  Name: Carol F. Herman & John H.Herman  Its: Exec VP & CFO  Its: Partners — Partner  
 

 
**EXHIBIT A**
Exhibit 8.1




Subsidiaries
of Industrias Bachoco S.A.B. de C.V.




The
following chart lists each of our subsidiaries which we owned, directly or
indirectly, as of December 31, 2009, and June 18, 2010:




1.    Aviser,
S.A. de C.V.




2.    Bachoco,
S.A. de C.V.




3.    Bachoco
Comercial, S.A. de C.V.




4.    Campi
Alimentos, S.A. de C.V.




5.    Huevo
y Derivados, S.A. de C.V.




6.    Operadora
de Servicios de Personal, S.A. de C.V.




7.    Pecuarius
Laboratorios, S.A. de C.V.




8.    Secba,
S.A. de C.V.




9.  Sepetec,
S. A. de C.V.




10.  Servicios
de Personal Administrativo, S.A. de C.V.




11.  Induba
Pavos, S.A de C.V.




Each of
the Subsidiaries listed is incorporated under the laws of
Mexico.
In re Mark H. BADGETT.

No. 114A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 16, 2008.

Paul R. Ross, Executive Secretary, James J. Coman, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for Judicial Standards Commission.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of April 2008 by Respondent for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Respondent (Badgett) shall have up to and including the 22nd day of May 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of April 2008."
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of LSB Financial Corp. (the "Registrant") that the QuarterlyReport of the Registrant of Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such report fairly present, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant forsuch period.

| Date    May 13, 2004      /S/ RANDOLPH F. WILLIAMSRandolph F. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate    May 13, 2004      /S/ MARY JO DAVIDMary Jo DavidVice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                                DOCUMENTUM, INC.
 
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA; UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    THREE MONTHS   NINE MONTHS
                                                        ENDED         ENDED
                                                    SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                    ------------- -------------
                                                     1997   1996   1997   1996
                                                    ------ ------ ------ ------
<S>                                                 <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>
Net Income......................................... $2,027 $1,352 $4,591 $2,751
                                                    ====== ====== ====== ======
Primary shares outstanding:
  Weighted average shares outstanding during the
   period.......................................... 14,341 14,029 14,238 13,689
  Common stock equivalent shares...................    653    894    655    975
                                                    ------ ------ ------ ------
                                                    14,994 14,923 14,893 14,664
                                                    ====== ====== ====== ======
Primary net income per common stock and common
 stock equivalent share (1)........................ $ 0.14 $ 0.09 $ 0.31 $ 0.19
                                                    ====== ====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
 
  Fully diluted earnings per share has been excluded from the presentation
since the calculation would result in per share amount equivalent to primary.
Joleando Lyndell JONES v. HARNETT COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, Jacqualyn L. Lee.

No. 410P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Joleando Lyndell Jones, for Jones, Joleando Lyndell.

Vernon K. Stewart, District Attorney.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 9th of December 2015 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Harnett County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6

STATE OF NEW MEXICO , 7 Plaintiff-Appellee, 8

v. NO. 30,746 9 PATRICK MAZZEI , 10 Defendant-Appellant. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 12 Robert M. Schwartz, District Judge 13 Gary K. King, Attorney General 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Appellee 16 Fuentes & Associates, P.C. 17 Robert R. Fuentes 18 Rio Rancho, NM 19 for Appellant 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION 21 VIGIL, Judge. 22 Defendant appeals from a conditional plea and disposition agreement in which 23 he pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated driving under the influence (Fourth or 242 Subsequent Offense). [RP 115] This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to 1 dismiss Defendant’s appeal for lack of a final order. Specifically, we proposed to 2 conclude that because sentencing was left pending while the Defendant’s case was 3 referred to drug court, and because no final judgment and sentence was entered, 4 Defendant’s notice of appeal was premature. See State v. Garcia , 99 N.M. 466, 471, 5 659 P.2d 918, 923 (Ct. App. 1983) (holding thatin a criminal case the final judgment 6 is the judgment and sentence or an order di smissing all charges against the defendant). 7 Defendant has filed a response to this Court’s notice of proposed summary 8 disposition. In his response, Defendant c oncurs with this Court’s proposed disposition 9 of dismissal. We therefore dismiss Defendant’s appeal as premature. Defendant may 10 re-file his appeal once a final judgment and sentence has been entered. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12

_______________________________ 13 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 14 WE CONCUR: 15

_________________________________ 16 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 17

_________________________________ 18 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 19
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certificate of the President and Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


> 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
>   (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
>   2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
>   respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2003

/s/ JEFFREY L MINCH
  Jeffrey L. Minch
  President and Chief Executive Officer

---

EXHIBIT 32.2Certificate of the Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Littlefield Corporation. (the “Company”)
  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kathy
  Scanlon, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

> 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
>   (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
>   2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
>   respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2003

/s/ KATHRYN L SCANLON
  Kathryn L. Scanlon
  Chief Financial Officer
----

(2004/C 33 E/097)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1226/03

by Freddy Blak (GUE/NGL) and Anne Jensen (ELDR) to the Commission

(2 April 2003)

Subject:   Protection of drivers in the export trade against violent attack

At its meeting of 14 October 2001, the Ministers of Justice and Home Affairs of the Member States and the candidate countries in association with the Commission adopted a declaration calling for appropriate measures to protect drivers in the export trade against violent attack. What progress has the Commission made in implementing such appropriate measures?

What progress have the Member States and the Commission made overall in their work to protect drivers in the export trade against violent attack? Has the work so far resulted in any specific initiatives and/or projects, and when can the results of their work be expected?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(15 May 2003)

On 14 October 2002, the Ministers of Justice and Home Affairs of the Member States of the Union and the candidate countries in association with the Commission adopted a joint declaration on the protection of commercial drivers engaged in export trade from becoming victims of organised crime (1). Pursuant to the third paragraph of that joint declaration national or international surveys should be conducted in order to map the incidents of crime directed at commercial drivers engaged in export trade and investigate the nature and scale of the problem and the background to it in their respective countries. A joint declaration has, however, no binding force upon the Member States

----

(1)OJ C 24, 31.1.2003.

----
# CE2004078EN.01004801.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/48

---

(2004/C 78 E/0046)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1820/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(2 June 2003)

Subject:   Sausage meat

Subject:

Is the Commission satisfied that the use of pork cheek or jowl in sausage meat is still consistent with healthy eating, particularly for children and old people, given the possible build-up of drug residues and disease in the pituitary glands?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2003)

(14 July 2003)

Definitions of ‘meat’ and ‘fresh meat’ are set down in Council Directive 64/433/EEC of 26 June 1964 on health problems affecting intra-Community trade in fresh meat (1). The terms mean that all parts of domestic swine which are suitable for human consumption and which have not undergone any treatment other than cold treatment to ensure preservation may be considered as fresh meat. The Directive prescribes ante mortem and post mortem health inspections and lists the meats that the official veterinarian declares unfit for human consumption. The use of hygienically produced pork cheek or jowl meat, in accordance with the requirements of the Directive, as raw material for the production of sausage meat is thus acceptable in principle. The term ‘sausage meat’, as such, is not defined in Council Directive 94/65/EC of 14 December 1994 laying down the requirements for the production and placing on the market of minced meat and meat preparations (2). Sausage meat must be produced in accordance with the requirements in that Directive for meat preparations.

1

2

The pituitary gland or hypophysis, being located at the base of the brain in the cranial cavity, is not harvested when cheek meat is removed.

In addition, Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products (3) provides for a statistically significant surveillance in food producing animals. It also requires that Member States take measures to protect the consumers where prohibited substances or residues above the permitted limits have been found. The Commission reports on these actions on a yearly basis.

3

---

(1)  OJ Ρ 121, 29.7.1964.

1

(2)  OJ L 368, 31.12.1994.

2

(3)  OJ L 125, 23.5.1996.

3

---
In the Matter of Julio Zelaya SORTO.

No. 137P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Jodi Harrison, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Julio Zelaya Sorto, for Sorto, Julio Zelaya.

Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 17th of April 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2020

No. 04-19-00555-CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF CHARLES INNESS THRASH, AN INCAPACITATED 

PERSON

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PC-2912

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellees’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

appellees’ brief is due on or before April 3, 2020.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
STATE v. FOSKEY.

No. COA07-1296.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 17, 2008.

Certification Date July 7, 2008.

Appeal from Onslow (07CRS1427).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 29, 2008

Mr. W. Wendell Hall

Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.

300 Convent Street, Suite 2200

San Antonio, TX 78205-3792

Ms. Kimberly S. Keller

The Keller Law Firm

13423 Blanco Road, Suite 300

San Antonio, TX 78216

RE:Case Number:  07-0091

Court of Appeals Number:  04-05-00056-CV

Trial Court Number:  2002-CI-08415

Style:TRAMMELL CROW CENTRAL TEXAS, LTD.

v.

MARIA GUTIERREZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LUIS GUTIERREZ; AND KAROL FERMAN AS NATURAL PARENT AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF LUIS ANGEL GUTIERREZ

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 07-0091Page 1**
STATE v. CORRY.

No. COA08-11.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 18, 2008.

Certification Date December 8, 2008.

Appeal from Gaston (06CRS67313, 06CRS67314, 06CRS67315, 06CRS67316).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.