alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3647 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of guide 

dogs to veterans blinded by a service-connected injury. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 4, 2013 

Mr. AMODEI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

provision of guide dogs to veterans blinded by a serviceconnected injury. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF GUIDE DOGS TO CERTAIN 

4 BLIND VETERANS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 1714 of 

6 title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as fol7 lows: 

8 ‘‘(b)(1) The Secretary shall provide guide dogs 

9 trained for the aid of the blind to a veteran who— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3647 IH

1 ‘‘(A) is blind by reason of a service-connected 

2 injury; 

3 ‘‘(B) is enrolled under section 1705 of this title; 

4 and 

5 ‘‘(C) elects to receive such a dog. 

6 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may provide guide dogs trained 

7 for the aid of the blind to a veteran who is— 

8 ‘‘(A) enrolled under section 1705 of this title; 

9 and 

10 ‘‘(B) not otherwise described under paragraph 

11 (1)(A). 

12 ‘‘(3) The Secretary may also provide a veteran de13 scribed in paragraph (1) or (2) with mechanical or elec14 tronic equipment for aiding them in overcoming the dis15 ability of blindness.’’. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1714(d) of 

17 such title is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (b) or (c)’’ 

18 and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (b) or 

19 subsection (c)’’. 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall take effect on the date that is 60 days 

22 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit32.1**

**RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.****Certification of Scott H. Rechler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director****of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the Sole General Partner of the Registrant,****Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

I, Scott H. Rechler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the sole general partner of Reckson Operating Partnership, L. P. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|        | 1)     | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |

|  | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: May 5, 2005

|   | By:    /s/    Scott H. Rechler                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |       Scott        H. Rechler      Chairman of the Board, Chief      Executive Officer, President and Directorof      Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the solegeneral       partner of the Registrant |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
----

(2004/C 33 E/281)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2560/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(4 August 2003)

Subject:   Funding for artistic handicrafts

According to a recent survey, Italy is the country with the highest number of craft industries and craftsmen in the EU. With around one and a half million firms and more than 3 million employees, the sector is one of the mainstays of the Italian economy, accounting for approximately 15 % of GDP. However, although the craft industries are of decisive importance in all EU countries, there is no unified legislation on the subject — for example laws in France and Italy are very different from those in Germany and Austria.

The trend towards harmonising the various sectors of the economy merely results in enhancing and regulating SMEs in general, thereby neglecting the craft industries and failing to draw up ad hoc policies for this sector, which constitutes the production base for the majority of businesses in the EU. Furthermore, until now no comprehensive study has been made of the handicraft firms in the EU nor is there a definition of ‘European craft industry’.

Handicrafts are the expression of the various cultures in the EU and should therefore be protected and encouraged in all their forms.

Can the Commission therefore say:

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(5 September 2003)

----

(1)  59, rue Cambronne, 75015 Paris: ch.beaux.arts@wanadoo.fr.

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I, David Anastasi, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 12, 2004



/s/    DAVID P. ANASTASIDavid P. Anastasi President and Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 08, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 08, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0471. ATLANTA USED CARS, INC. v. MICHAEL SHENKER.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15A01963
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.25



(QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL CORP. LOGO)

     Quintiles Transnational Corp.
     Post Office Box 13979
     Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3979
     918 998 2000 / Fax 919 998 9113
     http://www.quintiles.com


December 6, 2004

John Ratliff
QTRN

Re: Purchase of Pharma Shares

Dear John,

On July 15, 2004 you were offered the opportunity to purchase shares of common
stock of Pharma Services Holding, Inc. for $0.2438 per share. In connection with
potential tax liability to you resulting from your purchase of the shares,
Quintiles will pay to you the amount of $204,096.33. You remain responsible for
any personal tax liability whether or not this additional payment to you fully
addresses your tax liability.

We recommend that you seek advice from your personal tax advisor regarding the
payment and discuss with us by December 10, the related tax and withholding
issues. You also should consider whether any changes are appropriate with
respect to the 83(b) election you made in connection with the purchase.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 919-998-2517.

Sincerely,

/s/ Denise J. Eller

Denise J. Eller, CEBS
Associate Director, Global Compensation & Benefits
# CE2004088EN.01062601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/626 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/626

---

(2004/C 88 E/0644)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2622/03

by Philip Claeys (NI) to the Commission

(28 August 2003)

Subject:   Relations with Libya

Subject:

Earlier this month the Libyan leader, Colonel Gadaffi, accepted responsibility for the bombing of PanAm Flight 103 over Lockerbie in 1988. That act of terrorism claimed 207 lives. Libya is now prepared to pay compensation to the next of kin, its intention in so doing being to have international sanctions lifted.

On 18 August 2003, Commission President Prodi had a telephone conversation with Colonel Gadaffi; they spoke about the normalisation of Libya-EU relations. Libya is being invited to take part in the Euro-Mediterranean Process.

Problems in connection with Libyan terrorist attacks in the past have not yet been completely resolved, however. France opposes the lifting of sanctions against Libya until compensation has been paid to the next of kin of the victims of the attack on a UTA aircraft over Niger in 1989. That attack claimed 170 lives. Is the Commission planning to normalise relations with Libya before this French request has been complied with?

Libya has a dirty past with regard to conducting and backing international terrorism. Is normalisation of relations with the EU tied to conditions and guarantees in this respect? What formal agreements are being sought in this connection?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(19 September 2003)

(19 September 2003)

United Nations (UN) sanctions have been imposed to Libya in 1992 and 1993 in relation to the Lockerbie bombing. In 1999, against the background of Libyan co-operation with the Lockerbie investigation, the UN suspended those sanctions. As a result of an agreement reached on Lockerbie between the United States, the United Kingdom and Libya, a draft UN Security Council Resolution has been introduced by United Kingdom/Bulgaria on 18 August 2003 to lift the UN sanctions.

It is in this context that Colonel Kadhafi called President Prodi. The President encouraged Libya to solve Lockerbie and all other issues, on the basis of requests from the international community. Should the UN sanctions be lifted as a result of a positive UN vote, yet to take place, this will constitute an important step towards the reintegration of Libya into the international community. At present, Libya is an observer to the Barcelona Process, and is invited to become a full member under the strict condition that it accepts the Barcelona ‘acquis’ without any conditions (and also the lifting of the UN sanctions). Libya is also included in the new neighbourhood policy of the Union, in the context of a relationship based on the respect of shared values.

The UTA issue, which had been judged by the French judiciary, is being rediscussed as a result of the Lockerbie deal (delaying the sanctions). If the UN sanctions are lifted, then those discussions between France and Libya should conclude satisfactorily.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





|In connection with the Quarterly Report of September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|Dated:  November 9, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|
Lewis Junior JENKINS v. HARNETT COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, Jacqualyn L. Lee, Judge Faircloth.

No. 440P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Lewis Junior Jenkins, for Jenkins, Lewis Junior.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Harnett County District Court, et al.

Vernon K. Stewart, District Attorney.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 30th of December 2015 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Harnett County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
STATE of North Carolina v. Roger Lewis SMYRE.

No. 305P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Anne Bleyman, for Smyre, Roger Lewis.

Stuart M. Saunders, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 25th of August 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, *623and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th of August 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th of August 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136170 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136170 

 COA: 279976 

Wayne CC: 96-006438

JESSE EUGENE JONES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
_________________________________________ 

 

 

___________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

August 26, 2008 

136784 

WAYNE LAFOUNTAIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

 SC: 136784 

 CoA: 285297 

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of July 1, 2008, the Clerk of the Court is hereby 

directed to close this file. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 26, 2008 

Clerk
# C_2009180EN.01004301.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/43

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 June 2009 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-369/05) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Aids for restructuring and conversion in the wine sector - Aids for the improvement of the production and marketing of honey - Concept of loss of revenue due to implementation of the plan - Article 13(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 - Concept of intervention intended to stabilise the agricultural markets - Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999)

2009/C 180/78

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Commission Decision 2005/555/EC of 15 July 2005 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2005 L 188, p. 36), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by Spain in the wine and honey sectors.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.

1

---
In the Matter of M.A.M.

No. COA15-713.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
ex102form8k_sbh-112210.htm


  
 


Exhibit 10.2




 


First Amendment to the Employment Agreement







FIRST AMENDMENT, dated as of, and effective, November 16, 2010 (this “Amendment”), to the Employment Agreement dated as of August 16, 2010 (the “Agreement”) by and between Spectrum Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Terry L. Polistina (the “Executive”).







WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects; and agree that all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall otherwise remain in place, except as expressly amended herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties do hereby agree as follows, effective as of the date set forth below:







1.    Section 3(e) of the Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


 New Stock-Based Award.  Subject to the Executive’s continued employment with the Company: (i) in fiscal year 2011, the Executive shall receive a grant of stock awards for fiscal year 2011 consisting of 88,888 restricted stock units covering common shares of Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Parent”) (the “RSUs”) and (ii) in fiscal year 2012, the Executive shall receive a grant for fiscal year 2012 of 88,888 RSUs. The vesting of the RSUs will be subject to time and performance based vesting and shall be subject to the terms and conditions as more fully set on Exhibit A, attached hereto. For the avoidance of doubt, the Executive will not be entitled to the grant of RSUs following the termination of his employment with the Company.


 


2.    This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to principles of conflicts of laws thereof that would call for the application of the substantive law of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware.


 


3.     This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be a duplicate original, but all of which, taken together, shall constitute a single instrument.


 


 


[Signature Page follows]


 


 




  





  











  











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.



 




	 	
Spectrum Brands, Inc.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ John T. Wilson                   	 
	 	 	Name:  John T. Wilson 	 
	 	 	
Title:    Senior Vice President, Secretary 


             and General Counsel

	 
	 	 	 	 







 









EXECUTIVE:












/s/ Terry L. Polistina                                       


Name:  Terry L. Polistina