alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
                       CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey Wattenberg, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Othnet, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

     4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

          (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small
business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

          (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a)  All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

          (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: December 22, 2003         /s/ Jeffrey Wattenberg
                                Jeffrey Wattenberg,
                                President and Chief Executive
                                Officer
Deanne HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth HARDIN, Defendant.

No. COA14-1124.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 6, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Reversed and Remanded in Part.
# CE2004070EN.01023701.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/237 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/237

---

(2004/C 70 E/255)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3209/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(23 October 2003)

Subject:   Clinical Trials Directive

Subject:

Is the Commission aware that the implementation of the Clinical Trials Directive (2001/20/EC (1)) will force the abandonment of life-saving research by charitable institutions, such as Leukaemia Busters? Will the Commission exempt non-commercial clinical trials from the Directive to stop this happening?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 121, 1.5.2001, p. 34.

1

---
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3606 

AN ACT 

To extend the special immigrant nonminister religious worker 

program and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 3606 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Special Immigrant Non3 minister Religious Worker Program Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT NONMINISTER RELIGIOUS 

5 WORKER PROGRAM. 

6 (a) EXTENSION.—Subclause (II) and subclause (III) 

7 of section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Na8 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) are amended 

9 by striking ‘‘October 1, 2008,’’ both places such term ap10 pears and inserting ‘‘March 6, 2009,’’. 

11 (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 30 days after the 

12 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Home13 land Security shall— 

14 (1) issue final regulations to eliminate or reduce 

15 fraud related to the granting of special immigrant 

16 status for special immigrants described in subclause 

17 (II) or (III) of section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Im18 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

19 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)); and 

20 (2) submit a certification to Congress and pub21 lish notice in the Federal Register that such regula22 tions have been issued and are in effect. 

23 (c) REPORT.—Not later than March 6, 2009, the In24 spector General of the Department of Homeland Security 

25 shall submit to Congress a report on the effectiveness of 

26 the regulations required by subsection (b)(1). 
3 

•S 3606 ES

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that the Sec3 retary of Homeland Security submits the certification de4 scribed in subsection (b)(2) stating that the final regula5 tions required by subsection (b)(1) have been issued and 

6 are in effect. 

Passed the Senate September 26 (legislative day, 

September 17), 2008. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3606 

AN ACT 

To extend the special immigrant nonminister 

religious worker program and for other purposes.
STATE of North Carolina v. Keith A. LEAK.

No. 206A15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 18, 2015.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Narendra K. Ghosh, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to that court for further remand to the trial court for reconsideration of defendant's motion to suppress in light of *Rodriguez v. United States,* --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 1609, 191 L.Ed.2d 492 (2015).

VACATED AND REMANDED.
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2360Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/2360 of 16 December 2015 appointing a Greek member and a Greek alternate member of the Committee            of the Regions         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2360                     

# of 16 December 2015

# appointing a Greek member and a Greek alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Greek Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116(1), (EU) 2015/190(2) and (EU) 2015/994(3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January                              2020.

(2)On 10 December 2015, a member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate on                              the basis of which Mr Dimitrios KALOGEROPOULOS (*politically accountable to the Municipal Council of Maroussi*) was proposed.

(3)An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr                              Panagiotis KATSIVELAS,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which                     runs until 25 January 2020:                  

as member:
                -  Mr Dimitrios KALOGEROPOULOS, *Politically accountable to the Municipal Council of Palaio Faliro* (change of mandate);                                  

and

as alternate member:
                -  Mr Georgios PATOULIS, *Mayor of Maroussi*,                                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Dieschbourg                            

1

OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.                           

2

OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.                           

3

OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 69 

To authorize appropriations for the Hollings Manufacturing Extension 

Partnership Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. KOHL (for himself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for the Hollings Manufacturing 

Extension Partnership Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

4 THE HOLLINGS MANUFACTURING EXTENSION 

5 PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. 

6 (a) AMOUNTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008 THROUGH

7 2012.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the 

8 Secretary of Commerce for the Hollings Manufacturing 

9 Extension Partnership Program of the National Institute 

10 of Standards and Technology— 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 69 IS

1 (1) $110,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; 

2 (2) $115,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; 

3 (3) $120,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; 

4 (4) $125,000,000 for fiscal year 2011; and 

5 (5) $130,000,000 for fiscal year 2012. 

6 (b) HOLLINGS MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PART7 NERSHIP PROGRAM DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

8 ‘‘Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership Pro9 gram’’ means the program of Hollings Manufacturing Ex10 tension Partnership carried out by the National Institute 

11 of Standards and Technology under section 26 of the Na12 tional Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 

13 U.S.C. 278l), as provided for in part 292 of title 15, Code 

14 of Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00356

- CR
Jack Gerald Larkins a/k/a Jerry Larkins a/k/a Gerald Jack Larkins a/k/a Jack Gearold Larkins a/k/a Jack Larkins v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Tria l Cause No. 14

- CR

- 2677

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order thi s decision certified below for observance. October 18, 2018
STATE v. David SELLERS.

No. 406P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Phillip K. Woods, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

David Sellers, Brunswick, for Sellers, David.

C. Ricky Bowman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of December 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7601
CLEOFAS LEWIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD LOCKLEAR, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-821-5-BR) Submitted: November 28, 1995 Decided: April 19, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cleofas Lewis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Locklear , No. CA-95-821-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 902/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 902/2013 of 19 September 2013 on the issue of import licences for applications            lodged during the first seven days of September 2013 under the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 for poultrymeat         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 902/2013                     

# of 19 September 2013

# on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of September 2013 under the tariff quotas                        opened by Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 for poultrymeat                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration                           of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences(2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 of 14 May 2007 opening and providing for the administration of tariff                           quotas in the poultrymeat sector(3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 opened tariff quotas for imports of poultrymeat products.

(2)The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of September 2013 for the subperiod from 1 October                              to 31 December 2013 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences                              may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged under Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 for the subperiod                     from 1 October to 31 December 2013 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex to this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 September 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 September 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.                           

3

OJ L 125, 15.5.2007, p. 9.
# CE2004070EN.01018501.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/185 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/185

---

(2004/C 70 E/194)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2989/03

by Ioannis Marínos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(6 October 2003)

Subject:   Commission funding for the European Policy Centre

Subject:

In an invitation to MEPs, the European Policy Centre (EPC), which is situated in Brussels, indicates that ‘His Excellency the President of Northern Cyprus, Rauf Denktas’ (sic) will be a guest at a ‘breakfast policy briefing’ and urges the Members to attend. However, it is common knowledge that no country in the world (apart from Turkey, which is responsible for the military occupation of 37 % of Cyprus) acknowledges Mr Denktas as ‘President’, or accords his pseudo-state any degree of official recognition, while the UN and EU have repeatedly criticised his secessionist ambitions. Furthermore, this event, coinciding as it does with the run-up to the ‘Presidential elections’, could accordingly be interpreted as support for Mr Denktas against his political opponents.

Can the Commission tell me whether the Centre receives Community funding? If so, in which year did it commence and what precise amounts have been paid? If the Centre is receiving European Union funding, what steps will the Commission take to impress upon the recipients the inadmissibility of using the funds to promote recognition of regimes based on the use of violence and disregard for law?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(12 November 2003)

(12 November 2003)

The European Policy Centre (EPC) is an independent think-tank undertaking research on European affairs. It has received Community financial support since it was founded in 1996.

The budgetary authority earmarks appropriations each year in favour of the EPC as a think tank on budget line A-3026 (operating costs grants of EUR 125 000 awarded in 1999, 2000 and 2001, and EUR 150 000 in 2002 and 2003).

The Commission reports in detail each year to the Parliament on the beneficiaries of grants under chapter A-30. The reports can be seen on the Commission's Europa website.

In addition the Commission has supported specific actions carried out by the EPC, with total payments of EUR 90 400 from 1999 to-date.

The Commission understands that the proposed meeting described by the Honourable Member did not in fact take place.

---
EXHIBIT 23(b)
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
Xechem International,  Inc. and its subsidiaries on Forms S-8 Numbers (33-87034)
and (33-93300) as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on July 16,
1996, of our report dated  February 18, 2000,  on our audit of the  consolidated
financial  statements of Xechem  International,  Inc. and its subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999, and for the year then ended.


                                   Wiss & Company, LLP
                                   Certified Public Accountants

Livingston, New Jersey
April 11, 2001
J - A20026 - 18 NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DAVID TYRONE TRICE, JR. Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

No. 333 WDA 2018 Appeal from the Order February 13, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Criminal Division at No(s): CP - 02 - SA - 0002363 - 2017 BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., LAZARUS, J., and MUSMANNO, J. MEMORANDUM BY LAZARUS, J.: FILED AUGUST 3, 2018 David Trice appeals pro se from the order, entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, following his summary convictions for one count each of duties at stop sign, 1 driving an unregistered vehicle, 2 operating a vehicle without valid inspection, 3 and evidence of emission inspection. 4 After careful review, we quash. Trice was found guilty of the above - mentioned summary offenses and ordered to pay a $150 fine, plus costs. Tr ice filed a summary appeal from these convictions. Neither Trice nor his citing officer appeared for the de novo

___________________________ _________________ 1 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3323(b). 2 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1301(a). 3 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 4703(a). 4 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 4706(c)(5).J - A20026 - 18

- 2 - hearing that was held on February 13, 2018. Accordingly, the trial court dismissed the summary appeal and judgment was entered against Trice. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 462(D). Th is timely pro se appeal follow s . Trice has f ailed to adhere to the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure. See generally Pa.R.A.P. 2111; 2114 - 2119. Specifically, he fails to provide this Court with a concrete issue to be reviewed and also fails to set forth any argument , case law or other authority relevant to the entry of his summary convictions. Due to the numerous defects in Trice’s brief, we are prevented from conducting a meaningful review. See Pa.R.A.P. 2101 (briefs shall conform in all material respect with requirements of appellate rules as nearly as circumstances of particular case will admit; if defects in brief are substantial, appeal may be quashed or dismissed); see also Commonwealth v. Sanford , 44 5 A.2d 149 (Pa. Super. 1982) (when issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs and when briefs are wholly inadequate to present specific issues for review, our Court will not consider merits of case). Thus, we quash the appeal. 5

___________________________ _________________ 5 In Commonwealth v. Rivera , 685 A.2d 1011 (Pa. Super. 1996), our Court stated: While this court is willing to liberally construe material s filed by a pro se litigant, we note that appellant is not entitled to any particular advantage because [] he lacks legal training. As our [S] upreme [C] ourt has explained, any layperson choosing to represent [ him self] in a legal proceeding must, to someJ - A20026 - 18

- 3 - Appeal quash ed. Judgment Entered. Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary Date: 8/3/2018

___________________________ _________________ reasonable extent, assume the risk that [ his ] lack of expertise and legal training will prove [h is] undoing. Id. at 1013 (quoting O’Neill v. Checker Motors Corp. , 567 A.2d 680, 682 (Pa. Super. 1989)).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50654

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUADALUPE ARELLANO-GARCIA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-136-ALL

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Guadalupe Arellano-Garcia

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 5, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk