alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.18****CONSENT OF H. SMITH**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated byreference therein (the “40-F”) of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December31, 2009, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and theAnnual Information Form (the “AIF”) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of theCompany for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference inthe 40-F.     I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the followingreport(s) and to the references, as applicable, to my name in connection with (including, as anexpert) the following report(s) and documents: 1. The technical report dated May 1, 2008, entitled “Pueblo Viejo GoldProject, Dominican Republic Technical Report” (the “Pueblo ViejoReport”); and  2. The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connectionwith information relating to the Pueblo Viejo Report and the PuebloViejo Project, and the properties described therein.Date:March 19, 2010              /s/ Herbert A. Smith     Name:  Herbert A. Smith, P. Eng.     AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.
# C_2009180EN.01000202.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-480/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 92/50/EEC - No formal European tendering procedure for the award of waste treatment services - Cooperation between local authorities)

2009/C 180/03

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis and B. Schima, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma and C. Schulze-Bahr, Agents, C. von Donat, Rechtsanwalt)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 8 in conjunction with Titles III, IV, V and VI of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1) — Failure to organise a formal European award procedure for the award of waste disposal services by four local authorities (Landkreise) to a public body

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 20, 27.01.2007.

1

---
STATE v. Truman Calvin BOONE.

No. 382P93-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Truman Calvin Boone, Winston-Salem, for Boone, Truman Calvin.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of January 2016 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
John James SCHEFFER, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jeremy Talbot Scheffer, Deceased v. Nathaniel Eugene DALTON.

No. 386P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Michael J. Levine, Mooresville, for Scheffer, John James (Ind. & Adm.), et al.

William F. Lipscomb, Wilkesboro, for Dalton, Nathaniel Eugene.

Michael J. Greer, Mooresville, for Scheffer, John James (Ind. & Adm.).

Ann C. Rowe, Winston-Salem, for NC Association of Defense Attorneys.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 3rd of December 2015 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
----

(2004/C 65 E/284)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3161/03

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   Italian proposal for adapting Directive 97/24/EC to technical progress

In 2000, the Italian Government proposed that a procedure be launched for adapting Directive 97/24/EC (1) to technical progress with the aim of introducing the separate type-approval of replacement catalysts. This adaptation would enable all manufacturers of replacement catalytic converters to obtain type-approval for their products. Three years have passed since this proposal was presented, and it is still with the relevant departments at the Commission.

Could the Commission indicate what stage those departments have reached in their work, whether they have set themselves a deadline for completion of the work and whether on adoption the draft directive will take the form of a technical directive?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(18 November 2003)

The Commission is presently working on a very large package of amendments with respect to motorcycle emissions through reference to Articles 5-8 of Directive 2002/51/EC (2) (amending Directive 97/24/EC (3)). That package includes replacement catalytic converters and the Commission has worked closely with the Italian authorities, other Member States and stakeholders on this specific issue.

It was originally foreseen that the Italian proposal on replacement catalysts could be dealt with through the Committee for Adaptation to Technical Progress (CATP). However, the proposal needed more time for consideration by stakeholders and for the preparation of acceptable amendments. It should also be noted that the inclusion of requirements for replacement catalysts in Directive 97/24/EC will extend the scope of that Directive and this should not be addressed through CATP.

Replacement catalytic converters will therefore be dealt with in the overall package of measures to be proposed to the legislators through co-decision. This package of measures is subject to an extended impact assessment that will provide an evaluation of the Commission proposal to be presented to the Parliament and Council during the beginning of 2004.

----

(1)OJ L 226, 18.8.1997, p. 1.

(2)  Directive 2002/51/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the reduction of the level of pollutant emissions from two- and three-wheel motor vehicles and amending Directive 97/24/EC, OJ L 252, 20.9.2002.

(3)  Directive 97/24/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1997 on certain components and characteristics of two or three-wheel motor vehicles.

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Tamer Husseini, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Celeritek, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Celeritek, Inc.

By: /s/ TAMER HUSSEINI
        -------------------------
Name:   Tamer Husseini
Title:  Chief Executive Officer

    I, Margaret Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Celeritek, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Celeritek, Inc.

By: /s/ MARGARET E. SMITH
        ---------------------------
Name:   Margaret E. Smith
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.19

CONSENT OF ROBBERT BORST

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the
AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



|1. | The technical report dated March 16, 2012, entitled Technical Report on the Pueblo Viejo Project, Sanchez Ramirez Province, Dominican Republic NI 43-101
Report (the Pueblo Viejo Report); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Pueblo Viejo Report and the Pueblo Viejo Project, and the
properties described therein.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information
contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376 and 333-181116 on Form S-8 of the Company.



|                    |  |                             
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: March 1, 2013 |  |                             
|                    | 
|                    |  | /s/ Robbert Borst           
|                    |  | Name: Robbert Borst, C. Eng.
32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

          I, Ralph M. Amato, Chief Financial Officer of BoysToys.com, Inc. (the "Small Business Issuer") do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:

          (1)  	The Small Business Issuer's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Small Business Issuer.

By:  */s/ Ralph M. Amato*
# C_2006048EN.01004001.xml

| 25.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/40

---

Action brought on 21 December 2005 — Navigazione Libera del Golfo v Commission

(Case T-444/05)

(2006/C 48/77)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Navigazione Libera del Golfo (NLG) (Naples, Italy) (represented by: Salvatore Ravenna, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Commission of 12 October 2005 refusing access to data and information concerning the extra costs arising as a result of PSO (public service obligations) and payments to offset those costs in respect of the services carried out by Caremar SpA on the Naples Beverello-Capri route; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Commission of 12 October 2005 refusing access to data and information concerning the extra costs arising as a result of PSO (public service obligations) and payments to offset those costs in respect of the services carried out by Caremar SpA on the Naples Beverello-Capri route;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-109/05 Navigazione Libera del Golfo v Commission. (1)

Navigazione Libera del Golfo

Commission

1

It should, however, be stated that the contested decision in Case T-109/05 is based on Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001, whereas the decision at issue in this case is based on Article 4(4) and (5) of that regulation. Accordingly, it was not Caremar that was consulted, as ‘third party author’ of the documents/data to which access was requested, but rather it was the Italian authorities, which did not issue the documents of the case and had no concerns relating to commercial interests, that were consulted.

Further, that consultation was carried out in an artificial manner, given that the Member States have exclusive competence together with a right of veto which is binding on the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2005, p. 43.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymundo Vidal, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 190]

Appeal from a *1340judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R Fisher, J.), rendered January 21, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of attempted rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of attempted rape in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.35 [1]) and sexual abuse in the first degree (§ 130.65 [1]). We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel *(see generally People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). The record establishes that defense counsel “vigorously pursued” a strategic defense *(People v Garcia,*75 NY2d 973, 974 [1990]; *see People v Cleveland,*281 AD2d 815, 816 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 900 [2001]). We also reject defendant’s contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Gorski, Martoche, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
STATE of North Carolina v. Connie Prentice REAVES.

No. 225P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

*848Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Narcisa Woods, Raleigh, Attorney at Law.

Andrew DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Reaves, Connie Prentice.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Jason C. Yoder, Attorney at Law, for Reaves, Connie Prentice.

Connie Prentice Reaves, Ms., for Reaves, Connie Prentice.

Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd of July 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          37,018
<SECURITIES>                                   372,666
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,215,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                    85,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,528,602
<PP&E>                                      12,799,917
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,183,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,155,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,927,929
<BONDS>                                     12,241,677
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                   (113,287)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,155,821
<SALES>                                      5,064,943
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,064,943
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,390,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               254,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             662,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (138,980)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (45,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (93,980)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (93,980)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32 for 10QSB Period ended 4/30/2004


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Titan  Technologies,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period ended April 30,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, the
undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date  indicated  below,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     a)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

     b)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company

Date June 14, 2004

                                               /s/ Ronald L. Wilder
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Ronald L. Wilder,  President
                                               (Chief  Executive  Officer)
                                               (Chief  Financial  Officer)
State v. Timothy Allen Foxworth

188P16-1

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2016

Douglas W. Corkhill, Assistant Attorney General, J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

Timothy Allen Foxworth, for Foxworth, Timothy Allen.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of May 2016 by Defendant for Subpoena Duces Tecum:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of June 2016."

Ervin, J. recused
June 12, 2001


EXHIBIT 10.1



December 1, 2010



Andrew B. Cogan

New York, NY



Dear Andrew:

It is my pleasure to inform you that you will be a participant in the 2011 Knoll, Inc. Incentive Compensation Program. 

In these challenging times our objectives are simple and something that each of us can help contribute to:

Leverage our investments in sales, marketing and design initiatives as well as enhanced operational capabilities to drive top line growth and improved levels of profitability while continuing to make the right investments in products, service and technology to position Knoll for long term success as demand recovers. 

Our success in 2011 and beyond will be a direct result of your ability to help us accomplish these long term goals while meeting our short term 2011 operating profit plan. 

If you achieve your individual goals and Knoll makes its 2011 operating profit plan you can qualify for a total target incentive payment of $800,000.

This award is subject to my approval and that of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors), which may exercise discretion in adjusting your award up or down based on factors the Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors) deems appropriate, including Knoll's performance relative to the industry, other macroeconomic factors and your individual performance.  You must be employed by Knoll on the date this award is distributed in order to receive this incentive.

I have great confidence in your ability to contribute to our success in 2011 and look forward to being able to present you with your award in early 2012. 

Thank you for all that you do for Knoll.

Sincerely,

/s/ Burt Staniar

Burt Staniar

Chairman
# C_2008022EN.01001001.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 December 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-401/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - Sixth VAT Directive - Supply of services - Executor of a will - Place where the service is performed - Article 9(1) and (2)(e))

(2008/C 22/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 9(2)(e) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Services supplied by executors for customers established outside the Community or for taxable persons established in the Community but not in the same country as the supplier — Place of supply of services — Characterisation of activities of executors

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay, in addition to its own costs, those of the Federal Republic of Germany. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay, in addition to its own costs, those of the Federal Republic of Germany.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 2.12.2006.

1

---