alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004078EN.01078201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/782 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/782

---

(2004/C 78 E/0832)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3120/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(22 October 2003)

Subject:   Noise pollution

Subject:

Does the Commission intend to make available funding opportunities for local projects that will tackle the adverse effects of noise pollution in rural areas, for example, noise reduction barriers on motorways that run close to residential areas?

Can the Commission state how the Environmental Noise Directive will assist people living in rural areas but who suffer from the adverse effects (a reduced quality of life, stress) of persistent noise from nearby motorways?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(18 November 2003)

(18 November 2003)

The Commission is not planning to establish an EU funding instrument specifically for tackling noise pollution. However, projects in this field could be given financial support under existing mechanisms, including the financial instrument for the environment (LIFE).

Under Directive 2002/49/CE (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, which entered into force on 18 July 2002, the authorities in the Member States are required to draw up strategic noise maps in the vicinity of major transport infrastructure, including roads, and within the major conglomerations, on the basis of common indicators, to inform the public about exposure to noise and its effects, and to develop action plans to reduce noise, where necessary, and to preserve the quality of the acoustic environment where it is good.

1

With regard more especially to road infrastructure, noise maps and action plans have to be drawn up in 2007 and 2008, respectively, for major routes which have more than six million passenger vehicles a year. As a second stage, in 2012 and 2013, maps and action plans will have to be drawn up for major roads with more than three million passenger vehicles a year.

These maps and action plans will concern noise pollution generated by road infrastructure in urban areas as well as in rural areas.

---

(1)  OJ L 189, 18.7.2002.

1

---
**Exhibit 99.11****CONSENT OF P. NAKAI-LAJOIE**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following document, which isbeing filed as an exhibit to and incorporated by reference into the registration statement on Form40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission: 1. The annual information form of the Company dated March 25, 2008, whichincludes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the PorcupineMine, and the properties described therein.Date: March 28, 2008         /s/ Patti Nakai-Lajoie   Name:  Patti Nakai-Lajoie, P. Geo.   Title:  Senior Resource Evaluation Geologist, Porcupine Mine
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert W. O’Leary, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
     1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ValeantPharmaceuticals International;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: May 10, 2004/s/ ROBERT W. O'LEARY   **Robert W. O'Leary**   **Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer**
---

Exhibit 12.1

Telesystem International Wireless Inc.

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruno Ducharme, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Telesystem
International Wireless Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the company and have:

> (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
>   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
>   ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
>   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
>   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
>   prepared;
>   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
>   controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
>   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
>   period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
>   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
>   over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
>   report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
>   affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the
company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

> (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
>   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
>   likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
>   and report financial information; and
>   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
>   employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
>   financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005

|(signed)                                 
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|Bruno Ducharme                           
|President and
    Chief Executive Officer



---
STATE v. Steven L. PEOPLES.

No. 3P10-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Steven L. Peoples, Bunn, for Peoples, Steven L.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Valerie Mitchell Asbell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion***849The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th of July 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00284

- CV

TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC.

, Appellant

v.

ROMA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

, Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 14

- 289 Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred t hem.

SIGNED December 28, 2016.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez

, Justice
Timothy W. HOLLIDAY, Employee v. TROPICAL NUT & FRUIT CO., Employer, Farmington Casualty Co., Carrier.

No. 349P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Charles E. McGee, Asheville, Attorney at Law, for Tropical Nut & Fruit Co., et al.

Thomas F. Ramer, Asheville, Attorney at Law, for Holliday, Timothy W.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th of October 2015 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
exhibit10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


ADDENDUM NO. 3


 







This Addendum No. 3, dated May 4, 2001, by and between Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc., (formerly Universal Heights, Inc.) (hereinafter the “Company”), and Bradley I. Meier (“Employee”), modifies and amends the existing employment agreement (“Agreement”) and all prior Addenda thereto (“Prior Addenda”) between the Company and the Employee, only in respect of the matters set forth herein, and otherwise the Agreement and Prior Addenda remain in full force and effect as if this Addendum No. 3 had not been executed:


 


I.           In respect of the parties to the Agreement and Prior Addenda, Universal Insurance Holdings, Incorporated is the now legal name of Universal Heights, Inc., the name change having occurred on December 26, 2001, and all reference in the Agreement and Prior Addenda to Universal Heights, Inc., shall now apply with equal force of law to Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.


 


II.           In respect of “Article 6.” of the Agreement entitled “Compensation,” the first subsection (a) entitled “Base Salary” is modified as follows: “the Employee shall receive for the 2001 calendar year an additional fifteen (15%) percent increase in his base compensation in addition to the cumulative base compensation and increase calculated as at the beginning of the 2001 calendar year, retroactive to January 1, 2001; and for each successive year of the Term of the Agreement the base Compensation as adjusted by previous percentage increase(s) shall be increased annually by ten (10%) percent.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum No. 3 has been signed and executed as of the first date written above.


 


 





	
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.


	  
	
By:

	
/s/ Irwin Keller                    


Secretary and Director


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
/s/ Bradley I. Meier             


Bradley I. Meier - Employee
# CE2004088EN.01008301.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/83

---

(2004/C 88 E/0090)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2363/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 July 2003)

Subject:   Research by a Turkish vessel in Greek territorial waters in the Aegean

Subject:

It is reported in today's Greek press (8 July 2003) that from 4 to 19 July the Turkish oceanographic research vessel, the Piri Reis, will conduct research in the Aegean, in particular in Greek territorial waters. These reports state that the Greek navy has picked up an announcement broadcast by Izmir coastal radio station concerning the ‘vessel's oceanographic research’. According to its programme of ‘research’ the Piri Reis (which, incidentally, belongs to Izmir University) will carry out research at a distance of up to 5 nautical miles from the rocky islet ‘Kaloyeri’ in the Cyclades and at 25 other spots in Greek territorial waters.

It should be pointed out that Turkey (an applicant country) has previously dispatched this vessel into the Aegean with instructions to carry out research in Greek (and therefore Community) waters, thereby causing tension in Greek-Turkish relations.

Is the Commission aware of the intention of the Turkish authorities? Has the University of Izmir, which owns the vessel in question, received funding through any Community initiative (either directly or indirectly with loans or other Community funds)? What actions can the Commission take forthwith to prevail upon Turkey not to go ahead with research in the territorial waters of an EU Member State?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(11 September 2003)

(11 September 2003)

As regards the activities of the Turkish oceanographic research vessel in question, the Commission is not aware of the intention of the Turkish authorities. As to the University of Izmir, it has not benefited from Union funding.

In relation to the Greek-Turkish relations in general, the Commission refers to the principle of peaceful settlement of border disputes as set out in the Helsinki European Council Conclusions in December 1999.

Under the revised Accession Partnership with Turkey adopted on 19 May 2003, there is a priority for Turkey ‘in the context of the political dialogue to make every effort to resolve any outstanding border disputes and other related issues, as referred to in point 4 of the Helsinki conclusions’.

---
STATE v. Jose Luis MACIAS.

No. 510P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 2, 2015.

Jose Luis Macias, Nashville, for Macias, Jose Luis.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of August 2015 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

> *511"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of September 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,400
<SECURITIES>                                     8,779
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (50)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,924
<PP&E>                                          12,719
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,554)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,610
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,283
<SALES>                                         34,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,050
<CGS>                                           15,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,283)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,283)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Cancel notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service is issuing this notice to advise the public that we are canceling the notice of intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the False Island Timber Sale(s) project.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carol Goularte, District Ranger or Hans von Rekowski, Team Leader, Sitka Ranger District, 204 Siginaka Way, Sitka, AK 99835, phone (907) 747-4220, fax (907) 747-4253.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The False Island Timber Sale(s), Sitka Ranger District, Tongass National Forest Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     Number 150, Pages 50628-50629). The Forest Service is canceling that NOI to prepare an EIS for the False Island Timber Sale(s) on the southeastern part of Chichagof Island about 35 air miles north of Sitka, Alaska, 20 air miles west of Angoon, Alaska, and 15 air miles south of Tenakee Springs. The project and this NOI are being cancelled because the project is not feasible at this time, primarily due to economic consideration of the potential timber sale offering.                

Dated: August 25, 2005.

Forrest Cole,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 05-17563 Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Micheal Antony1 PAIGE.

No. COA14-1324.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Sept. 15, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Reversed in part; Vacated in part; No Prejudicial Error in part; Remanded for Resentencing.
STATE of North Carolina, v. William Thomas GLASCO, Defendant.

No. COA14-978.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Sept. 1, 2015.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINON**

No Error in Part; Vacated and Remanded in Part.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 11, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51581

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CURTIS WAYNE CLEVELAND,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-193-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Curtis Wayne

Cleveland presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by

United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001),

which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-inpossession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# CE2004070EN.01026201.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/262 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/262

---

(2004/C 70 E/283)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3394/03

by Astrid Thors (ELDR) to the Commission

(17 November 2003)

Subject:   Cruelty to animals in applicant countries

Subject:

The history of dancing bears is an old and savage one. In Bulgaria, several dozens bears have been poached or purchased on the black market and subjected to a harsh training regime. Dancing bears are still commonplace in Romania as well. The standard method of training involves forcing a thick iron ring through their nose, which causes considerable pain when yanked. The bears dance in an attempt to avoid the pain. Alternatively, music is played whilst the bears stands on hot plates, where it will dance to stop being burnt. It will then dance whenever it hears music. When not performing, the bears are chained up with little shelter, no exercise and limited food and water. Misguided tourists perpetuate the tradition by giving money.

In the accession negotiations, has the Commission paid any attention to the fact that Romania and Bulgaria allow this cruelty to animals and, in this way, breach what is current European Union legislation?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(8 December 2003)

(8 December 2003)

The Commission deplores cruelty to animals in all its forms. However, the Commission is only able to act in animal welfare matters where it has the legal power to do so.

Under the relevant Protocol to the EC Treaty animal welfare considerations must be taken into account in relation to the Community agriculture, transport and internal market and research policies. The use of animals for entertainment purposes falls outside the scope of Community animal welfare law. The prevention of cruelty to such animals is a competence of individual Member States.

It has, therefore, not been possible to raise the issue mentioned by the Honourable Member during the accession negotiations.

---