alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Keith Wayne CARVER.

No. COA15-303.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
STATE v. GAMBLE.

No. COA08-502.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS60817, 06CRS15967).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General notice.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the following Customs broker permits are cancelled without prejudice. Name
Permit
Issuing portGeneral Brokerage Services, Inc.
H34
Miami.( print page 54567)General Brokerage Services, Inc.
99-00537
Washington, DC.MarketMakers, Inc.
WW6
Miami.Oscar H. Vildosola
26-02-ALW
Nogales.Menlo Worldwide Trade Services, Inc.
26-02-001
Nogales.Mary Fong
20016
Los Angeles.Hanshin Air Cargo
98013
Los Angeles.Menlo Worldwide Trade Services, Inc.
52-03-225
Miami.Mark Leverett
WYT
Miami.
 Dated: September 8, 2005. Jayson P. Ahern, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.


[FR Doc. 05-18361 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-06-P
Order entered October 16, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 01086
- CV CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V. MARKO PRINCIP, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court a t Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 16
- 00202
- B



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 12, 2017 motion for extension of time to file a
brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to November 16, 2017 . We caution appellant that further extension requests in this accelerated appeal will be disfavored.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
STATE of North Carolina v. Gregory Aldon PERKINS.

No. 332PA14-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

G. Glenn Gerding, Attorney at Law, for Perkins, Gregory Aldon.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 6th of October 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of October 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Othnet, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2003,  as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

      (1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements  of
Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of  1934;
and

       (2)   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 15, 2003        By: /s/ Jeffrey Wattenberg
                                Jeffrey Wattenberg,
                                President   and   Chief
                                Executive Officer


Date: September 15, 2003        By: /s/ Jeffrey Wattenberg
                                Jeffrey Wattenberg,
                                Principal Financial
                                Officer
----

(2004/C 33 E/205)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2020/03

by Sérgio Marques (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 June 2003)

Subject:   Support scheme for producers in the fisheries sector

In 1992, to compensate for the fact that certain outermost regions are islands, a support scheme was adopted for producers in the fisheries sector, providing for contributions to offset the additional marketing and transport costs that they were incurring because there were no regional markets near at hand and the cost of transport from the regions concerned to the mainland was high.

New regulations were adopted in 1994, 1995, and 1998 in order to continue the measures laid down in the initial regulation. The last of these regulations was intended to remain in force until 31 December 2001. Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1587/98 (1) stipulated that the Commission was to submit a report on its implementation by 1 June 2001. However, the Commission wished to probe more deeply into the impact of the measures adopted and the additional costs entailed for the fisheries sector enterprises because of their remote location and, moreover, to take into account the debate on reform of the CFP. It thus considered it necessary to put the submission date for the report back to 1 June 2002 and, consequently, to extend Regulation (EC) No 1587/98 for another year, with the result that the regulation remained in force until 31 December 2002. The Commission proposal to that effect (for which a dual legal basis was invoked, namely Articles 37 and 299(2) of the Treaty) was accepted by the Council and endorsed by Parliament.

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(23 July 2003)

The Commission can inform the Honourable Member of the following:

----

(1)OJ L 208, 24.7.1998, p. 1.

----
Amendment to Material Contract Robinson




 Exhibit 10.5(a) 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made between PGI ENERGY FUND I SERIES-2010, INC., a Texas corporation (the “Company”) and Carl A. Robinson (“Executive”), and
collectively known as the “the Parties, to become effective as of November 17, 2010 (the “Effective Date”). 

RECITALS 
 WHEREAS on
June 15, 2010, the Parties entered into an Employment Agreement wherein the Company agreed to employ and the Executive agreed to accept such employment upon the terms and conditions set forth therein. 

WHEREAS, on November 17, 2010, the Parties agree and approve this Amendment to said Agreement under which the Parties will agree to obligate and
bind themselves. 
 WHEREAS, The Parties agree to the following terms and conditions and expressly agree that the following terms and conditions
only are amended. All remaining portions of the Employment Agreement not specifically Amended herein remain unaltered. If any of the following terms and conditions conflict with any of the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement, then,
notwithstanding any term in the Agreement, the following terms and conditions govern and control the rights and obligations of the parties. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, said Agreement is amended as follows: 
 1. Paragraph 3.(c)
Incentive Stock Option Plan is deleted and is amended to read as follows: 
 3.(c) Incentive Stock Option Plan Executive shall be
entitled to participate in the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan. Following the execution of this Agreement, the Company shall take all actions necessary to issue to Executive an Unregistered Stock award under the Long-Term Incentive Plan
of 5,000,000 shares of common stock. 
 2. Paragraph 15 is added to read: 

15. Acknowledgment. 

The Parties hereby Acknowledge and Agree that the Employment Agreement is not enforceable unless and until the Company receives funding
under the Subscription Agreement with Heffernan Capital Management Co., Ltd. 

  

			
	Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement	  	page 1










 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the date first set forth above.

  

	
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	//SS: Carl A. Robinson
	  Carl A. Robinson
	
	THE COMPANY:
	
	PGI ENERGY FUND I SERIES-2010, INC.
	
	 //SS: Marcellous McZeal

	 By: Marcellous McZeal

	
	Its: Chief Executive Officer


  

			
	Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement	  	page 2
----

(2004/C 65 E/136)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2272/03

by Pedro Marset Campos (GUE/NGL) to the Council

(7 July 2003)

Subject:   Situation of workers at the Sintel company (Spain)

Although it is now almost two years since they accepted the government's offer and conditions (agreement of 3 August 2001) designed to facilitate the introduction of a package of measures to resolve the crisis at Sintel with the involvement of all the parties concerned, the workers at the bankrupt Sintel company remain as defenceless now as they were when the crisis first arose.

The workers' legal representatives have still not been invited to meet with receivers, the government or the Telefónica telecommunications company, as a party involved in the bankruptcy procedure, given that the workers are the main creditors. Without the participation of the workers it is difficult to see how the agreement can be implemented.

It has been two years since bankruptcy was declared (by order of 28 May 2001) and yet no meeting of creditors has as yet been called to appoint official receivers, thereby making it impossible for the workers to exercise their rights as creditors. Many aspects of the agreement have not been complied with and the workers' rights have not been upheld.

Reply

(17 November 2003)

The Council is aware of the fact that the implementation of the rescue package in respect of the failed telecommunications company Sintel is a particularly sensitive subject in Spain.

Community legislation adopted in recent years demonstrates that the information and consultation of employees and their representatives is an important issue for the Council.

Provisions on employee information and consultation are contained in Council Directive 94/45/EC of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees (1), Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies (2) and Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (3). Another key instrument in this context is Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community (4), which the Member States should implement no later than 23 March 2005.

However, the Commission is responsible for monitoring and, where appropriate, enforcing the application of the relevant directives by the Member States. The Council is consequently not in a position to comment on this specific case.

----

(1)OJ L 254, 30.9.1994, p. 64.

(2)OJ L 225, 12.8.1998, p. 16.

(3)OJ L 82, 22.3.2001, p. 16.

(4)OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 29.

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, David M. Brain, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Entertainment Properties Trust (the Issuer), have executed this certification for furnishing to the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the filing with the Commission of the registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report). I hereby certify that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David M. BrainDavid M. BrainPresident, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: February 26,
2010
In the Matter of the FORECLOSURE OF DEED OF TRUST EXECUTED BY Jason Brian VICKS and Mekeisha Vicks dated February 12, 2007 and Recorded in the Union County Public Registry, North Carolina.

No. 183P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Jason Brian Vicks, for Vicks, Jason Brian, et al.

Mekeisha Vicks, for Vicks, Jason Brian, et al.

D. Kyle Deak, Raleigh, for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (as Trustee for Soundview Home Loan Trust).

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendants on the 29th of May 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Trustee, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina *197Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th of May 2015 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, October 21, 2005.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

For Further Information Contact: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-18336 Filed 9-12-05; 11:52 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 864/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 864/2014 of 7 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 864/2014                     

# of 7 August 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. Sebastian X. MOORE.

No. 409P05-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Sebastian X. Moore, Raleigh, for Sebastian X. Moore.

Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of NC.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of June 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
ANDREWS v. HAYGOOD.

No. 57A07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 23, 2008.

Molly A. Orndorff, Burlington, for Charlie Brown, Trustee.

Susannah Holloway, for NCDHHS.

Timothy P. Lehan, Raleigh, Robert M. Clay, for Haygood, et al.

Brent Stephens, Durham, for Andrews, et al.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Durham, Burton Craige, Raleigh, for NCATL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of July 2008 by Other Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Appellant (Charlie Brown, Trustee) shall have up to and including the 4th day of August 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of July 2008."
In re the Foreclosure of BROWN.

No. 224PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 29, 2015.

Wilder Wadford, Weaverville, for Brown, Grover C., et al.

Adam W. Bull, Asheville, for Almond, Nelson T. (Executor), et al.

John R. Dillard, for First Choice Title, LLC.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 29th of September 2015 by Petitioner:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of September 2015."

*72Petitioner shall have up to and including the 9th day of November 2015 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 72 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 72

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide improved 
 reimbursement for clinical social worker services under the medicare 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. Reid (for Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide improved 
 reimbursement for clinical social worker services under the medicare 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equity for Clinical Social Workers 
Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVED REIMBURSEMENT FOR CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER SERVICES 
              UNDER MEDICARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1833(a)(1)(F)(ii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(a)(1)(F)(ii)) is amended to read as follows: 
``(ii) the amount determined by a fee schedule established by the 
Secretary,''.
    (b) Definition of Clinical Social Worker Services Expanded.--
Section 1861(hh)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(hh)(2)) 
is amended by striking ``services performed by a clinical social worker 
(as defined in paragraph (1))'' and inserting ``such services and such 
services and supplies furnished as an incident to such services 
performed by a clinical social worker (as defined in paragraph (1))''.
    (c) Clinical Social Worker Services Not To Be Included in Inpatient 
Hospital Services.--Section 1861(b)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(b)(4)) is amended by striking ``and services'' and 
inserting ``clinical social worker services, and services''.
    (d) Treatment of Services Furnished in Inpatient Setting.--Section 
1832(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395k(a)(2)(B)(iii)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and services'' and inserting ``clinical 
        social worker services, and services''; and
            (2) by adding ``and'' at the end.
    (e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments made for clinical social worker services furnished on 
or after January 1, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeremy Douglas EDWARDS.

No. 496PA10.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 10, 2011.

Rudolph A. Ashton, III, New Bern, for Edwards, Jeremy Douglas.

E. Burke Flaywood, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Kirby H. Smith, III, New Bern.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of November 2010 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of March 2011."