November 25. 1974 

. 

The Honorable Neil Caldwell 

Chairman 

Appropriations Committee 

House of Representatives 

P. 0. Box 2910 

Austin, Texas 78767 

Opinion No. H- 456 

Re: Ouestions concerning 

salaries of non-faculty 

employee* of colleges 

and universities 

Dear Representative Caldwell: 

Your opinion request raises the following questions: 

Are non-faculty employees at colleges and 

universities paid from auxiliary enterprise 

funds entitled to the benefits of the salary 

increases provided for in Article IV, Section 46, House Bill No. 139, Chapter 659, 

63rd Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 

1973 [The Appropriations Act]? 

In the event we should determine that such employees are not entitled ‘. +. 

to the benefits provided by Article IV, section 46. you further request ‘. 

that we decide whether they are properly included as members of. the; 

Teacher Retirement System. 

Section 51.002 of the Texas Education Code provides for the 

retention of “control” of certain sums of money collected by the 

higher education i.nstitutions enumerated in section 51.001(a).. Among 

the categories of funds so specified are: 

. . . 

(2) charges for use of rooms and dormitories; 

(3) receipts from meals, cafes and cafeterias; 

. . . 

p. 2098 
The Honorable Neil Caldwell, page 2 (H-456) 

No definition of auxiliary enterprise is contained in the Texas Education 

Code. We assume for the purposes of this opinion that enterprises 

generating the type of funds mentioned in Section 51. 002(a)(2) and (3) 

are the auxiliary enterprises about which you inquire. ‘. 

Control over auxiliary enterprise funds, however, is subject to 

the operation of section 51.006. Attorney General Opinion V-54 (1947). 

That section provides: 

No part of any of the funds listed in Section 51.002 

of this code shall ever be used to increase any 

salary beyond the sum fixed by the legislature in 

the general appropriations act, and the provisions 

of this subchapter are subordinate to the general 

appropriations act for the support of each institution. 

(Emphasis added). 

It is clear from a~ review of the authorities in point that the effect,of ..’ 

section 51.006 is to make the use of the funds over which institutional i 

“control” is retained subject to the will of the Legislature as expressed 

,.:: 

‘: ~ 

in the biennial Appropriation Act. Attorney General Opinions V-715 (1948); 

v- 54 (1947). 

,. 

Auxiliary enterprise funds, even though generated internally by the . 

operation of the enterprise, are subject to appropriation by the Legislature’: :’ ‘~ 

Attorney General Opinion V-715 (1948). See also Article IV section 17 of 

the Appropriation Act of 1973 (reappropriating balances within local institutional funds at the cIose of fiscal year 1973 and the income to those funds 

for the fiscal years 1974 and 1975 for continued use by the respective 

state institutiuns); Article IV, section 20 (allowing transfers “between items 

of appropriations 0 0 a regardless of whether said appropriation items are 

General Reverue or local funds in character . . . ‘I); and Article IV,. section 

27b (providing for the deposit of local funds other than “Local Income fiqm. 

Educational Activities”[including auxiliary enterprise funds], “for which 

appropriations are made in [Article IV, Appropriations Act of 1973]).” For. 

this reason use regulations imposed by the Appropriations Act upon these 

funds are a valid exercise of Legislature authority within that Act. Thus, 

it is clear that the Legislature can control the use to which local (e. g., -, 

auxiliary enterprise) funds are put. The answer to your question, then, 

turns on whether the Legislature da by the Appropriations Act exercise 

that control with respect to auxiliary enterprise funds. 

p. 2099 
. 

The Honorable Neil, Caldwell, page 3 (H-456) 

. 

. 

Article IV, section 46 of the Appropriations Act states: 

NON FACULTY SALARIES. a. For the fiscal 

year beginring September 1, 1973, within the limitation of funds available for salaries and wages of nonfaculty employees, the following increases over the 

August 1973 rates shall be provided for non-faculty 

employees effective September 1, 1973: 

b. For the fiscal year beginning September 1, 

1974, all non-faculty employees will receive an 

increase of 3.4% over their August 1974 rate. 

The section clearly provides that “all non-faculty employees” be given 

the raises indicated. The question presented by your request, then, 

ultimately depends upon the meaning ascribed to the phrase “all nonfaculty employees” in the context of the above section. 

Neither sections 51.001. et seq., of the Texas Education Code or the 

Appropriation Act of 1973 defines the term “non-faculty employees. ‘I 

However, an examination of the definition given that term by implication 

in a closely related part of the Code, is illumi.nating. 

‘Faculty member’ means a person who is employed 

by an institution of higher education on a full time 

basis as a member of the faculty or staff and whose 

duties incl.ude teaching, research. administration, 

including professional librarians, or the performance 

of professional services, but does not mean a person 

employed in a position which is in the institution’s 

classified personnel system or a person employed in 

a similar type of position if the institution does not 

have a classified personnel system. Texas Education 

Code, 5 51.352(4). (Emphasis added) 

Clearly, auxiliary enterprise personnel are “employed by an institution 

of higher education. I’ It is also evident that they.do not come within the 

definition of ‘,‘faculty member” as provided in the above section. We con- . 

elude from a reading of the specific provisions of section 51.352 in light 

of the clear language of the salary increase provision of Article IV, section 46 

p. 2100 
‘. . 

. 

The Honorable Neil Caldwell, page 4 (H-4’56) . . . .’ 

of the Appropriations Act of 1973, that the Act did not specifically or by 

implication attempt to distinguish between different groups of non-faculty 

employees who were granted a raise within the limitations of funds 

available. 

Our affirmative conclusion in response to your first question renders 

discussion of your second questi,on unnecessary. 

,. 

. 

SUMMARY 

Non-faculty employees at colleges and universities 

paid from auxiliary enterprise funds are entitled to, the ” 

benefits of the salary increases provided for in Article 

IV, section 46 of the Appropriations Act of 1973 within . “’ 

the limitation of funds available. 

APPROVED: 

.., 

Very truly yours, 

A i 

c/ Attorney General of Texas ., 1 

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

p. 2101 

I . 

.