alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a) Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Michael T. Willis, certify that:

 

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Westaff, Inc. (the “registrant”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(3) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.              The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)             All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)            Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

Date:  August 26,2008

 

 
|  /s/  Michael T. Willis           |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael T. Willis                      |   |
| Westaff, Inc.                     |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |   |

 

----
# CE2004078EN.01041601.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/416 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/416

---

(2004/C 78 E/0437)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2672/03

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(2 September 2003)

Subject:   Allocation of slots at airports

Subject:

When will the Commission conclude its consultations on proposed revisions to the 1993 regulation on the allocation of slots at Community airports, when does it expect to publish its proposals, and is it the Commission's intention to address the issue of major airlines exercising grandfather rights to the detriment of the development of regional airports and free competition between airlines?

Article 9 of the existing regulation gives Member States the option to reserve slots for regional routes. What is the maximum and minimum percentage of slots so reserved at airports across the EU, and under what circumstances can the Commission intervene to prevent, or to insist on, slots being so allocated?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(26 September 2003)

(26 September 2003)

The Commission has adopted a proposal to modify the current rules on airport slot allocation on 20 June 2001 (1). Following the opinion of the Parliament in First Reading (2) the Commission modified its initial proposal on 7 November 2002 (3). The Council has yet to produce a Common Position on that proposal. Therefore, the conclusion of consultations on proposed revisions depend on the adoption of the Common Position.

1

2

3

Also, as announced in the explanatory memorandum to its initial proposal, the Commission has launched a study to assess the effects of different slot allocation schemes. This study has yet to be finalised. On the basis of this study and further consultation with the industry and Member States, the Commission will consider how to further possibly modify the current system of slot allocation based on the principle of grandfather rights.

As far as the application of Article 9 of the current Regulation (4) is concerned, there are no minimum or maximum amounts for slots which Member States have the right to reserve at fully coordinated airports for the purpose of regional services. However, Member States have to communicate to the Commission the routes for which slots have been reserved. This should ensure that reserved slots correspond effectively to routes to a peripheral development region, and/or routes where public service obligations have been imposed.

4

---

(1)  OJ C 270 E, 25.9.2001.

1

(2)  A5-0186/2002, rapporteur Stockmann of 10 June 2002.

2

(3)  COM(2002) 623 final.

3

(4)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports, OJ L 14, 22.1.1993.

4

---
Jennifer Denise DIXON, Plaintiff, v. Bill DIXON, Defendant.

No. COA15-355.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18356]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Public Meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax 
Reform

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Change in meeting date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises all interested persons of change in the 
date of a public meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal 
Tax Reform.

DATES: This meeting scheduled to be held on Friday, September 23, 2005, 
has been postponed. This meeting will be rescheduled and announced at a 
later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Panel staff at (202) 927-2TAX 
(927-2829) (not a toll-free call) or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bed7d0d8d1fecadfc6ccdbd8d1ccd3cedfd0dbd290d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="076e6961684773667f75626168756a776669626b29606871">[email protected]</span></a> 
(please do not send comments to this box). Additional information is 
available at http://www.taxreformpanel.gov.

    Dated: September 12, 2005.
Mark S. Kaizen,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18356 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4811-33-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE of North Carolina, v. Evans AINE II, Defendant.

No. COA15-490.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 19, 2016. Mandate February 8, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Sharron HUNTER-RAINEY, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY and the Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina, Respondents.

No. COA15-178.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 2, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Reversed and Remanded.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 676 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

AN ACT 

To provide that the Executive Director of the Inter-American 

Development Bank or the Alternate Executive Director 

of the Inter-American Development Bank may serve on 

the Board of Directors of the Inter-American Foundation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

S 676 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO APPOINT EXECUTIVE DIREC2 TOR OR ALTERNATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 

3 OF THE INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT 

4 BANK TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE 

5 INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION. 

6 The third sentence of section 401(g) of the Foreign 

7 Assistance Act of 1969 (22 U.S.C. 290f(g)) is amended 

8 to read as follows: ‘‘Three members of the Board shall 

9 be appointed from among the following: officers or employ10 ees of agencies of the United States concerned with inter11 American affairs, the United States Executive Director of 

12 the Inter-American Development Bank, or the Alternate 

13 Executive Director of the Inter-American Development 

14 Bank.’’. 

Passed the Senate March 15, 2007. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
STATE v. GUILLEN-MARTINEZ.

No. COA08-213.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 2, 2008.

Certification Date December 22, 2008.

Appeal from Rowan (07CRS50972).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Presidential Documents

53719 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 174 

Friday, September 9, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7922 of September 4, 2005 

Death of William H. Rehnquist 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

As a mark of respect for William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United 

States, I hereby order, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States of America, including section 7 of title 

4, United States Code, that the flag of the United States shall be flown 

at half-staff at the White House and on all public buildings and grounds, 

at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the 

Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United 

States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, Tuesday, September 

13, 2005. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the 

same period at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and 

other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels 

and stations. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–18037 

Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
IN RE N.W.

No. COA08-935.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from Guilford (95JB123).

Case reported without published opinion. Remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Exhibit 99.9

CONSENT OF CHRIS OSIOWY

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp
Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



|1. | The technical report dated March 14, 2011, as amended March 30, 2011, entitled Red Lake Gold Operation, Ontario, Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Red Lake Report); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Red Lake Report and the Red Lake Gold Mines, and the properties described therein.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration
Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376, 333-181116 and 333-188805 on Form S-8 of the Company.

Date: March
31, 2014



/s/ Chris OsiowyName: Chris Osiowy, P.Geo.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 30 September 2009 – Elf Aquitaine v Commission**

**(Case T-174/05)**

Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Monochloroacetic acid market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Market sharing and price fixing – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based – Imputability of the infringement – Principle that penalties must fit the offence – Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis – Presumption of innocence – Principle of sound administration – Principle of legal certainty – Misuse of powers – Fines

1.                     *Competition – Administrative procedure – Statement of objections – Necessary content – Observance of the rights of the defence
(Council Regulation No 1/2003, Arts 23 and 27(1)) (see paras 55-56, 70-71, 196-198)*

2.                     *Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Decision to apply competition rules – Decision relating
to several addressees (Arts 81 EC, 82 EC and 253 EC) (see paras 79-80)*

3.                     *Competition – Community rules – Infringements – Attribution – Parent company and subsidiaries – No discretion of the Commission
(Arts 81 EC and 82 EC) (see paras 106-108, 225-227)*

4.                     *Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Undertaking – Concept – Economic unit – Attribution of infringements
– Parent company and subsidiaries – Joint and several liability of the companies concerned (Art. 81(1) EC) (see paras 121-124,
184-187, 192-194)*

5.                     *Competition – Community rules – Infringements – Attribution – Parent company and subsidiaries – Economic unit – Criteria for
assessment – Presumption of decisive influence exercised by the parent company over its wholly‐owned subsidiaries – Obligation
of the parent company to rebut the presumption that management power was actually exercised over its subsidiary – Applicability
of the presumption where the parent company holds nearly all the capital of the subsidiary (Arts 81 EC and 82 EC) (see paras
125, 151-156, 160, 172-173)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for, principally, annulment of Articles 1(d), 2(c), 3 and 4(9) of Commission Decision C(2004) 4876 final of 19 January 2005 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/37.773 – MCAA) or, in the alternative, application for annulment of Article 2(c) of that decision, or, in the further alternative, application for variation of the said Article 2(c). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Elf Aquitaine SA to pay the costs. |
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Ohio State Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Todd M. Wanner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Todd M. Wanner
Todd M. Wanner
Chief Financial Officer
March 20, 2003
# CE2004084EN.01023301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/233 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/233

---

(2004/C 84 E/0275)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3282/03

by Anne André-Léonard (ELDR) to the Council

(30 October 2003)

Subject:   Harmonisation of European legislation in respect of boatmasters' certificates for recreational craft

Subject:

Parliament and the Council recently amended Directive 94/25/EC (1) on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft.

1

This directive is centred on the establishment of environmental and safety standards for the construction of such craft.

However, a further aspect which should not be overlooked is the need for Community harmonisation in the area of boatmasters' certificates for recreational craft.

In this connection, does the Council envisage the introduction of a European boatmaster's certificate? If so, what measures does it intend to take to ensure effective regulation in this area?

Reply

(9 March 2004)

(9 March 2004)

The Council attaches great importance to legislative or administrative provisions designed to contribute to raising safety standards in all areas under exclusive or shared Community competency. The recently amended Directive by the European Parliament and the Council on recreational craft should be seen also in this context.

Regarding possible measures to harmonise a European boatmaster's certificate for recreational craft, the Council points out that any such proposal would fall within the Commission's right of initiative. To date, no such proposal has been submitted to the Council.

---

(1)  OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 15.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Terry Cherelle GRAY, Jr. & Charles Hezekiah Gilchrist, Jr.

No. COA15-500.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 2, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error in Aisbi and Burglary Convictions and Sentences; Vacate Sentences for MM and Remand for Resentencing; Vacate Defendant Gilchrist?s Felonious CCW Judgment, Enter Judgment on Misdemeanor CCW and Resentence; IAC Claim Denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of LIN TV Corp. for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Gary R. Chapman,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, William A. Cunningham, Vice President
and Controller, Deborah R. Jacobson, Vice President of Corporate Development and
Treasurer, and Peter E. Maloney, Vice President of Finance, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 17, 2003                        /s/ Gary R. Chapman
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Gary R. Chapman
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 17, 2003                        /s/ William A. Cunningham
                                                --------------------------------
                                                William A. Cunningham
                                                Vice President and Controller


Dated: November 17, 2003                        /s/ Deborah R. Jacobson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Deborah R. Jacobson
                                                Vice President of Corporate
                                                Development and Treasurer


Dated: November 17, 2003                        /s/ Peter E. Maloney
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Peter E. Maloney
                                                Vice President of Finance
ARMSTRONG v. D.C. AUTOMOTIVE, et al.

No. 490P06-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Mayor of the City of Wilson, for D.C. Automotive.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of May 2007 by Plaintiff for judgment with supporting affidavit and documentation in his favor and against appellees:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of December 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                        752,627
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 778,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (56,892)
<INVENTORY>                                11,115,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                      2,648,271
<DEPRECIATION>                              (561,803)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             17,342,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                    10,484,151
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    2,905,682
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,444,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               17,342,658
<SALES>                                    10,936,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           11,151,693
<CGS>                                       7,738,719
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               8,967,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             31,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,203,811
<INCOME-TAX>                                  881,852
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,321,959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>