alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 368 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require an audiometric test of 

each member of the Armed Forces before the separation of the member. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2013 

Mr. BENISHEK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require an 

audiometric test of each member of the Armed Forces 

before the separation of the member. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUDIOMETRIC TEST REQUIRED BEFORE SEPA4 RATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

5 FORCES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 59 of title 10, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new section: 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 368 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1179. Audiometric test required 

2 ‘‘Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of 

3 Defense, the Secretary of a military department shall en4 sure that a member of the armed forces under the jurisdic5 tion of the Secretary receives an audiometric test at the 

6 8000 Hz frequency (or other test that the Secretary of 

7 Defense determines has the ability to discover potential 

8 future hearing loss) to evaluate the hearing of the member 

9 during the 90-day period before the date on which the 

10 member is discharged, separated, or retired.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

13 after the item relating to section 1178 the following new 

14 item: 

‘‘1179. Audiometric test required.’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 1179 of title 10, 

16 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall 

17 apply with respect to a member being discharged, sepa18 rated, or retired from the Armed Forces on or after the 

19 date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of 

20 this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Harry M. Neer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  |                        
|                     |  | /s/ Harry M. Neer      
|                     |  | Harry M. Neer          
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



                      UNIVERSAL AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                      ----------------------------
                                                         2003             2002
                                                      ----------      ------------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>
(Loss) earnigs per share:

BASIC NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Numerator:
  (Loss) income from continuing operations            $ (974,470)     $   151,911


Denominator:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding           8,224,949        8,120,406
  Effect of dilutive securitiesd
    Conversion of preferred srock                              -        3,014,380
    Common stock equivalents from                                       1,030,965
     warrants and options
                                                      ----------      -----------
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share      8,224,949       12,165,751
                                                      ==========      ===========
  Basic net income (loss) per common share            $    (0.12)     $      0.02
  Diluted neet income (loss) per common share         $    (0.12)     $      0.01
</TABLE>
STATE v. Demario Lamont SNEAD.

No. 90PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Oct. 27, 2015.

C. Scott Holmes, Durham, for Snead, Demario Lamon.

*762Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, for Snead, Demario Lamont.

Roxann L. Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of North.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 23rd of October 2015 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of October 2015."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 30th day of October 2015 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Aaron FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. SONA BLW PRECISION FORGE, INC., Defendant.

No. COA15-1015.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 15, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument

*

is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. See FED. R. APP.

P. 34(a)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted August 14, 2008*

Decided August 22, 2008

Before

 RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

 DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

 JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 07-3679

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DIRK ALAN ADAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Indiana,

South Bend Division.

No. 03:07cr29

Robert L. Miller, Jr.,

Chief Judge.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 07-3679 Page 2

O R D E R

Dirk Adams, a convicted felon and unlawful user of controlled substances, pleaded

guilty to possession of firearms and ammunition. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), (g)(3). The

district court, over Adams’s objection, set a base offense level of 20 on the assumption that

his Indiana felony conviction for driving under the influence is a conviction for a “crime of

violence.” See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) cmt. n.1. The court sentenced Adams to 46 months’

imprisonment, the low end of the imprisonment range. Had the court sustained Adams’s

objection, his base offense level would have been 14, and his imprisonment range, 24 to 30

months. Adams now appeals.

During the pendency of this appeal, the Supreme Court overruled circuit precedent

and held in Begay v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 1581 (2008), that drunk driving is not a “violent

felony” as that term is defined in the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), see 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(e)(2)(B). Cf. United States v. Sperberg, 432 F.3d 706, 708 (7th Cir. 2005) (holding that

Wisconsin felony conviction for driving under the influence is a “violent felony” under the

ACCA). Adams was not sentenced under the ACCA, but in Sperberg, 432 F.3d at 708, we

concluded that “violent felony” and “crime of violence” have the same meaning, compare 

18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B) with U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a), and even before Sperberg we had held that

felony drunk driving is a crime of violence under the pertinent section of the guidelines,

United States v. Rutherford, 54 F.3d 370, 376-77 (7th Cir. 1995). As the government

anticipated, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Begay abrogates our holding in Rutherford. We

thus conclude that Adams must be resentenced. His sentence on each count is VACATED,

and the case is REMANDED for resentencing.
# CE2004070EN.01022002.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/220 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/220

---

(2004/C 70 E/237)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3108/03

by Philip Claeys (NI) to the Commission

(22 October 2003)

Subject:   Subsidies

Subject:

Can the Commission state whether it provides financial and/or other support to the following organisations, who say they are engaged in the fight against racism?

If it does, can it also provide details, for each organisation, of the sums involved for each of the years 2000, 2001, 2002 and, if possible, 2003?

Under which programmes have subsidies been granted to these organisations:

| — | Searchlight (UK); |
| --- | --- |

—

Searchlight (UK);

| — | Commission for Racial Equality, CRE (UK); |
| --- | --- |

—

Commission for Racial Equality, CRE (UK);

| — | Liga voor Mensenrechten (Flanders, Belgium); |
| --- | --- |

—

Liga voor Mensenrechten (Flanders, Belgium);

| — | Mouvement contre le Racisme, l'Antisémitisme et la Xénophobie, MRAX (Belgium); |
| --- | --- |

—

Mouvement contre le Racisme, l'Antisémitisme et la Xénophobie, MRAX (Belgium);

| — | Centrum voor Gelijkheid van Kansen en Racismebestrijding (Belgium); |
| --- | --- |

—

Centrum voor Gelijkheid van Kansen en Racismebestrijding (Belgium);

| — | Antifascistische Onderzoeksgroep Kafka (Netherlands); |
| --- | --- |

—

Antifascistische Onderzoeksgroep Kafka (Netherlands);

| — | Ras l'Front (France); |
| --- | --- |

—

Ras l'Front (France);

| — | SOS Racisme (France); |
| --- | --- |

—

SOS Racisme (France);

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(4 December 2003)

(4 December 2003)

None of the eight organisations listed is in receipt of direct financial support from Community funds. Under the Community Programme to Combat Discrimination 2001-2006, some of these organisations are currently or have been in the past, partners in transnational projects, which are coordinated and managed by other organisations.

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1840]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney 
Disorders; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2) notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The purpose of this meeting is to evaluate requests 
for preclinical development resources for potential new therapeutics 
for type 1 diabetes. The outcome of the evaluation will be a decision 
whether NIDDK should support the request and make available contract 
resources for development of the potential therapeutic to improve the 
treatment or prevent the development of type 1 diabetes and its 
complications. The research proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the proposed research projects, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Type 1 Diabetes--Rapid Access to Intervention 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, National Institute of Diabetes 
and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
    Date: February 9, 2005.
    Time: 10 a.m.-2 p.m.
    Agenda: To evaluate requests for preclinical development 
resources for potential new therapeutics for type 1 diabetes and its 
complications.
    Place: 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
conference call).
    Contact Person: Dr. Myrlene Staten, Senior Advisor, Diabetes 
Translation Research, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and 
Metabolic Diseases, NIDDK, NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-5460, 301-402-7886.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Disease and Nutrition Research; 98.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and 
Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: January 26, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

[FR Doc. 05-1840 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3684 

To prohibit Federal funding of foreign travel by the Administrator of the 

Environmental Protection Agency until the Agency conducts public listening sessions on rulemaking targeting carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants in each of the 15 States with the highest percentage 

of electricity generated by coal in 2012. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2013 

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. CRAMER, and Mr. LUETKEMEYER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 

Transportation and Infrastructure, Agriculture, and Science, Space, and 

Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding of foreign travel by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency until the 

Agency conducts public listening sessions on rulemaking 

targeting carbon dioxide emissions from existing power 

plants in each of the 15 States with the highest percentage of electricity generated by coal in 2012. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3684 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Listen to Americans 

3 First Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NO FOREIGN TRAVEL UNTIL PUBLIC LISTENING 

5 SESSIONS ARE CONDUCTED IN STATES THAT 

6 RELY ON COAL. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed8 eral funds may be obligated or expended for any travel 

9 outside of the United States or its territories by the Ad10 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 

11 until— 

12 (1) the Environmental Protection Agency con13 ducts public listening sessions on rulemaking tar14 geting carbon dioxide emissions from existing power 

15 plants in each of the 15 States with the highest per16 centage of electricity generated by coal in 2012 

17 (West Virginia, Kentucky, Wyoming, Indiana, Mis18 souri, North Dakota, Utah, Nebraska, New Mexico, 

19 Ohio, Colorado, Kansas, Iowa, Montana, and Wis20 consin); and 

21 (2) the Administrator of the Environmental 

22 Protection Agency certifies to the chairman and 

23 ranking member of the Committee on Energy and 

24 Commerce of the House of Representatives and the 

25 chairman and ranking member of the Committee on 

26 Environment and Public Works of the Senate that 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3684 IH

1 the 15 public listening sessions described in para2 graph (1) have taken place. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
The STATE of North Carolina v. Marlette TOOMER, Defendant.

The State of North Carolina v. Vernon Toomer, Defendant.

No. COA14-1246.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 20, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
**Exhibit 99.16**

**CONSENT OF DR. SALLY GOODMAN, P.GEO.**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibits thereto, ofGoldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the “Annual Report”), I, Dr. Sally Goodman, P.Geo., consent to (i) the use of and reference to the technical report dated 31 December, 2015,entitled “Cerro Negro Operations, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, NI 43-101 Technical Report” (the “Technical Report”), or portions thereof, that was prepared by me, that I supervised the preparation of and/or was reviewed andapproved by me, (ii) the use of and references to my name, including as an expert or “qualified person”, in connection with the Annual Report, the Technical Report, and my review and approval of all scientific and technical informationrelating to exploration results contained in the Company’s management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “MD&A”) which is attached asExhibit 99.2 to the Annual Report, and (iii) the information derived or summarized from the Technical Report that is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto. 

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibits thereto intoRegistration Statement Nos. 333-126039,333-126040,333-151243,333-151251,333-174376,333-181116,333-188805,333-195816 and333-213153 on Form S-8,No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company. 

Date: March16, 2017 

 

**CONSENT OF DR. SALLY GOODMAN, P.GEO.**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibits thereto, ofGoldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the “Annual Report”), I, Dr. Sally Goodman, P.Geo., consent to (i) the use of and reference to the technical report dated 31 December, 2015,entitled “Peñasquito Polymetallic Operation, Zacatecas State, Mexico, NI 43-101 Technical Report” (the “Technical Report”), or portions thereof, that was prepared by me, that Isupervised the preparation of and/or was reviewed and approved by me, (ii) the use of and references to my name, including as an expert or “qualified person”, in connection with the Annual Report and the Technical Report, and (iii) theinformation derived or summarized from the Technical Report that is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto. 

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibits thereto intoRegistration Statement Nos. 333-126039,333-126040,333-151243,333-151251,333-174376,333-181116,333-188805,333-195816 and333-213153 on Form S-8,No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company. 

Date: March16, 2017 

 

/s/ Dr. Sally Goodman

Name:
 
Dr. Sally Goodman, P.Geo.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 688 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 688

               For the relief of Griselda Lopez Negrete.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2007

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Griselda Lopez Negrete.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Griselda Lopez 
Negrete shall be considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Griselda Lopez 
Negrete, as provided in section 1, the Secretary of State shall 
instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1 during the current or next 
following fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas available to 
natives of the country of the birth of Griselda Lopez Negrete under 
section 202(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1152(a)(2)).
                                 <all>
```