Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 180 / Monday, September 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 54837 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(j) The Manager, Engine Certification 

Office, has the authority to approve 

alternative methods of compliance for this 

AD if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Related Information 

(k) None. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

August 19, 2005. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(l) You must use GE Alert Service Bulletin 

(ASB) No. CT7–TP S/B 72–A0464, Revision 

2, dated May 9, 2003, to perform the 

inspection required by this AD. The Director 

of the Federal Register approved the 

incorporation by reference of this service 

bulletin in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) 

and 1 CFR part 51. Contact General Electric 

Aircraft Engines CT7 Series Turboprop 

Engines, 1000 Western Ave., Lynn, MA 

01910; telephone (781) 594–3140, fax (781) 

594–4805, for a copy of this service 

information. You may review copies at the 

Docket Management Facility; U.S. 

Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh 

Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001, on the Internet 

at http://dms.dot.gov, or at the National 

Archives and Records Administration 

(NARA). For information on the availability 

of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, 

or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federalregister/cfr/ibr-locations.html. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

August 19, 2005. 

Richard Noll, 

Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–17493 Filed 9–16–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA 2003–16091; Airspace 

Docket No. 03–AGL–12] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Establishment of Domestic VOR 

Federal Airway V–19; OH 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action establishes 

Domestic Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal Airway 

V–19 northeast of the Cincinnati, OH, 

VOR/Tactical Air Navigation 

(VORTAC). The FAA is taking this 

action to reduce congestion on VOR 

Federal Airway V–5 between Columbus, 

OH, and Cincinnati, OH, and to enhance 

the management of aircraft operations 

over the Cincinnati, OH area. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, December 

22, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steve Rohring, Airspace and Rules, 

Office of System Operations Airspace 

and AIM, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 9, 2003, the FAA 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of proposed rulemaking to 

establish V–19 northeast of the 

Cincinnati, OH, VORTAC to reduce 

congestion on V–5 between Columbus, 

OH, and Cincinnati, OH, and to enhance 

the management of aircraft operations 

over the Cincinnati, OH, area (68 FR 

68576). Interested parties were invited 

to participate in this rulemaking effort 

by submitting written comments on this 

proposal to the FAA. No comments 

were received in response to the 

proposal. With the exception of editorial 

changes, this amendment is the same as 

that proposed in the notice. 

Domestic VOR Federal airways are 

published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA 

Order 7400.9N dated September 1, 2005, 

and effective September 16, 2005, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Federal airway listed in this 

document will be published 

subsequently in the order. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR part 71) by 

establishing V–19 in the Cincinnati, OH, 

area. Specifically, this action establishes 

V–19 between Columbus, OH, and 

Cincinnati, OH, to the south of V–5 and 

to the north of the Buckeye Military 

Operations Area. The FAA is taking this 

action to reduce congestion on V–5 and 

to enhance the management of aircraft 

operations over the Cincinnati, OH, 

area. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9N, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated September 1, 2005, and 

effective September 16, 2005, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal 

Airways. 

* * * * * 

V–19 (New) 

From Cincinnati, OH; INT Cincinnati 063° 

and Appleton, OH, 229° radials; Appleton. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 

12, 2005. 

Edith V. Parish, 

Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules. 

[FR Doc. 05–18502 Filed 9–16–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 73 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–22400; Airspace 

Docket No. 05–AWP–10] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Amendment to Using Agency for 

Restricted Areas R–2510 A & B; El 

Centro, CA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action changes the using 

agency of Restricted Areas R–2510A & 

54838 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 180 / Monday, September 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

R–2510B, from ‘‘CO, Yuma MCAS, AZ,’’

to ‘‘Commanding Officer, U.S. Navy 

Fleet Area Control and Surveillance 

Facility, San Diego, CA.’’ The FAA is 

taking this action in response to a 

request from the United States Navy to 

reflect an administrative change of 

responsibility for the restricted areas. 

There are no changes to the boundaries; 

designated altitudes; time of 

designation; or activities conducted 

within the affected restricted areas. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, December 

22, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken 

McElroy, Airspace and Rules, Office of 

System Operations Airspace and AIM, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 

267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 73 by 

changing the using agency of R–2510 A 

& B, El Centro, CA. On July 18, 2005, the 

U.S. Navy requested that the FAA 

change the using agency from ‘‘CO, 

Yuma MCAS, AZ,’’ to ‘‘Commanding 

Officer, U.S. Navy Fleet Area Control 

and Surveillance Facility, San Diego, 

CA.’’ This action addresses that request. 

This is an administrative change and 

does not affect the boundaries; 

designated altitudes; or activities 

conducted within the restricted areas. 

Therefore, notice and public procedure 

under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, Policies and Procedures 

for Considering Environmental Impacts. 

This airspace action is not expected to 

cause any potentially significant 

environmental impacts, and no 

extraordinary circumstances exist that 

warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73 

Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted 

areas. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 73, as follows: 

PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 73.25 [Amended] 

■ 2. § 73.25 is amended as follows: 

* * * * * 

R–2510A El Centro, CA [Amended] 

By removing the words ‘‘Using 

agency. CO, Yuma MCAS, AZ,’’ and 

inserting the words ‘‘Using agency. 

Commanding Officer, U.S. Navy Fleet 

Area Control and Surveillance Facility, 

San Diego, CA.’’

* * * * * 

R–2210B El Centro, CA [Amended] 

By removing the words ‘‘Using 

agency. CO, Yuma MCAS, AZ,’’ and 

inserting the words ‘‘Using agency. 

Commanding Officer, U.S. Navy Fleet 

Area Control and Surveillance Facility, 

San Diego, CA.’’

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 

12, 2005. 

Edith V. Parish, 

Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules. 

[FR Doc. 05–18503 Filed 9–16–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[CGD09–05–123] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Milwaukee River 

Challenge, Milwaukee River, 

Milwaukee, WI 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a temporary safety zone on 

the Milwaukee River, in Milwaukee, WI. 

This zone is intended to restrict vessels 

from a portion of the Milwaukee River 

in Milwaukee, WI during the Milwaukee 

River Challenge. This temporary safety 

zone is necessary to protect participants 

and spectators of the event from the 

hazards associated with vessel traffic on 

the Milwaukee River. 

DATES: This rule is effective from 10 

a.m. (local) on September 17, 2005 

through 4:30 p.m. (local) on September 

17, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Comments and material 

received from the public, as well as 

documents indicated in this preamble as 

being available in the docket, are part of 

docket [CGD09–05–123] and are 

available for inspection or copying at 

U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, 

2420 S. Lincoln Memorial Dr., 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53207 between 7 

a.m. (local) and 3:30 p.m. (local), 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marine Science Technician Chief 

Harold Millsap, Prevention Department, 

Sector Lake Michigan, 2420 S. Lincoln 

Memorial Dr., Milwaukee, WI 53207, 

(414) 747–7160. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information 

We did not publish a notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 

regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the 

Coast Guard finds that good cause exists 

for not publishing an NPRM. The permit 

application was not received in time to 

publish an NPRM followed by a final 

rule before the effective date. Under 5 

U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for 

making this rule effective less than 30 

days after publication in the Federal 

Register. Delaying this rule would be 

contrary to the public interest of 

ensuring the safety of participants and 

vessels during this event and immediate 

action is necessary to prevent possible