alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6357

ALBERT A. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ELAINE CHAPMAN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:07-hc-02143-H)

Submitted: August 6, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Albert A. Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Williams v. Chapman, No. 5:07-hc-02143-H

(E.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 99.25**

**CONSENT OF IAN RUSSELL**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibitsthereto, of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the “Annual Report”), I, Ian Russell, consent to the references to my name in connection with (including, as an expert or“qualified person”) the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto, including as to my supervision of the preparation of the mineral resources figures for Red Lake Mines and the Cochenour Deposit. 

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibitsthereto into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126039,333-126040,333-151243,333-151251,333-174376,333-181116,333-188805,333-195816 and333-213153 on Form S-8,No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company. 

Date: March16, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54386-54387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18303]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 12:00 p.m., Monday, September 19, 2005.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle A. Smith, Director, Office of 
Board Members; 202-452-2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at

[[Page 54387]]

approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 9, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-18303 Filed 9-9-05; 4:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
In the Matter of A.E., J.M., and T.B.

No. COA15-326.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Dec. 1, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
William L. BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS.

No. 389PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 28, 2009.

K. Edward Greene, Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown.

T. Keith Black, Greensboro, for Ellis.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of January 2009 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Ellis) shall have up to and including the 23rd day of February 2009 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 28th day of January 2009."
**Order of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 14 July 2008 – Fresyga v Commission**

**(Case T-323/06)**

Action for annulment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Decision 2006/613/EC – List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region – Challengeable act – Lack of direct effect – Inadmissible

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Meaning – Measures producing binding legal effects (Art. 230, first para., EC;
Council Directive 92/43, Arts 4(2), 5 and 6; Commission Decision 2006/613, Art. 1, second para., and Annexes 1, 2 and 3) (see
paras 22-26)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them (Art. 230, fourth para.,
EC; Council Directive 92/43, Arts 4(5) and 6; Commission Decision 2006/613, Annex 1) (see paras 32-37)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2006/613/EC of 19 July 2006 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2006 L 259, p. 1), in so far as it declares the site designated as ‘Ramblas de Gergal, Tabernas y Sur de Sierra Alhamilla’, which includes land belonging to the applicant, to be a site of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Fresyga SA to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission. |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 17, 2020

s0610

Order 

Clerk

June 17, 2020

160720

DEPARTMENT OF TALENT AND ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT/UNEMPLOYMENT

INSURANCE AGENCY,

Appellee,

v SC: 160720

COA: 334074

Wayne CC: 18-000267-AE

ANDREW M. AUGUSTINE,

Claimant-Appellant,

and

TAYLOR FORD, INC.,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of Dep’t of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs/Unemployment Ins Agency v Lucente

(Docket No. 160843-4) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in 

that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we 

ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
exv10w3







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.3




REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY





     Mimi’s Cafe, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Guarantor”), hereby: (i)
consents to the execution of the Line of Credit Note in the principal amount of $45,000,000, dated
December 1, 2010 (the “Note”), by Bob Evans Farms, Inc., an Ohio corporation
(“Borrower”), payable to the order of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Bank”); (ii)
ratifies and reaffirms the Continuing Guaranty, dated September 30, 2008 (the “Guaranty”),
made by Guarantor in favor of Bank, which includes the guaranty of amounts payable under the Note
and with respect to letters of credit issued by Bank for the account of Borrower; (iii)
acknowledges and agrees that Guarantor is not released from its obligations under the Guaranty by
reason of the Note, (iv) represents and warrants that there are no defenses, offsets or
counterclaims to the Guaranty; and (v) represents and warrants that there are no defaults by the
Guarantor under the provisions of the Guaranty.



     This Reaffirmation of Guaranty shall not be construed, by implication or otherwise, as
imposing any requirement that Bank notify or seek the consent of Guarantor relative to any past or
future extension of credit, or modification, extension or other action with respect thereto, in
order for any such extension of credit or modification, extension or other action with respect
thereto to be subject to the Guaranty, it being expressly acknowledged and reaffirmed that
Guarantor has under the Guaranty consented, among others things, to modifications, extensions and
other actions with respect thereto without any notice thereof or further consent thereto.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Mimi’s Cafe, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Tod P. Spornhauer
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Tod P. Spornhauer 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Manager, Assistant Treasurer and

Assistant Secretary
	 
	 
	 	Date: December 1, 2010
**Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2006 – Finland v Commission**

**(Case T-350/05)**

Preliminary issues – Objection of inadmissibility – Act without binding legal effect – Own resources of the European Communities – Infringement procedure – Default interest provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 – Negotiation of an agreement on a conditional payment

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Measures producing binding legal effects (Art. 230 EC; Council Regulation No
1150/2000) (see paras 36-38)*

2.                     *Own resources of the European Communities – Establishment and making available by the Member States (Council Regulation No
1150/2000) (see paras 39-47)*

**Re:**

| |
| --- |
| APPLICATION for annulment of the decision of the Commission (General Secretariat) contained in the letter of 8 July 2005, by which the Commission refused to open negotiations with the Republic of Finland concerning the conditional payment of duties claimed retroactively together with default interest accrued up to the date of payment of those duties, claimed by the Commission from the Republic of Finland in the context of infringement procedure No 2003/2180, brought under Article 226 EC. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LIN
TELEVISION CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH LIN
TELEVISION CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-Q DATED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000931058
<NAME> LIN TELEVISION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,067
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,671
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,839
<PP&E>                                         150,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,850,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,855
<BONDS>                                        299,361
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     714,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,850,354
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,239
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (47)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,770)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,028
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,798)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,798)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Peter Papano, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|                                               
|/s/ PETER PAPANO                               
|Peter Papano Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer

August 9, 2006
CRYSTAL COAST INVESTMENTS, LLC, d/b/a Sparkman Construction, Plaintiff, v. LAFAYETTE SC, LLC, Defendant.

No. COA15-118.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Dec. 1, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error in Part; Remanded in part.
McLAUGHLIN, et al. v. BAILEY, et al.

No. 163A15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 18, 2015.

Harvey L. Kennedy, for McLaughlin, Ivan, et al.

Harold L. Kennedy, III, Winston-Salem, for McLaughlin, Ivan, et al.

Sean F. Perrin, Charlotte, for Bailey, Daniel, et al.

William G. Simpson, Jr., Chapel Hill, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jon Ward, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Edmond W. Caldwell, Jr., Executive Vice President and General Counsel, for North Carolina Sheriffs' Association.

J. Michael McGuinness, Elizabethtown, for N.C. State Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of December 2015 by North Carolina State Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of December 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                       722,097
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                625,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (57,492)
<INVENTORY>                               11,389,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                     2,629,270
<DEPRECIATION>                              (636,486)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            16,843,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                   10,507,774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   2,905,514
<OTHER-SE>                                 2,001,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              16,843,420
<SALES>                                    4,628,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           4,705,584
<CGS>                                      3,918,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4,653,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               86,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                  34,744
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  51,456
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0


</TABLE>
# C_2023314EN.01002502.xml

| 4.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/25

---

Action brought on 26 July 2023 — Essity Hygiene and Health AB v EUIPO (Representation of a leaf)

(Case T-434/23)

(2023/C 314/31)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Essity Hygiene and Health AB (Gothenburg, Sweden) (represented by: U. Wennermark, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of an EU figurative mark (Representation of a leaf) — Application No 16 709 305

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 May 2023 in Case R 2196/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims primarily that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as the appeal is dismissed (point two of the operative part of the decision); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as the appeal is dismissed (point two of the operative part of the decision);

| — | amend the contested decision by granting the appeal against the examiner’s decision for goods in Class 16 covered by the application; |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision by granting the appeal against the examiner’s decision for goods in Class 16 covered by the application;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs incurred before EUIPO and before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs incurred before EUIPO and before the Court.

The applicant claims in the alternative that the Court should:

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own legal costs and, in addition, pay the applicant’s costs incurred before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own legal costs and, in addition, pay the applicant’s costs incurred before the Court.

The applicant claims in the further alternative that the Court should:

| — | order EUIPO to pay its costs incurred before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay its costs incurred before the Court.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
STATE v. Charles R. GOODSON.

No. 182P10-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Charles R. Goodson, Bunn, for Goodson, Charles R.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of July 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."

ERVIN, J. recused.
STATE v. Quincey Lamar HILL.

No. 150P15-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Quincey Lamar Hill, Bayboro, for Hill, Quincey Lamar.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of December 2015 by Defendant for Re-Hearing:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."

BEASLEY, J. recused.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.6
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Annual Report of OAO Technology Solutions, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Jeffrey Fox, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  March 27, 2003            By:     /s/   J. Jeffrey Fox
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         J. Jeffrey Fox
                                         Senior Vice President of Finance and
                                         Chief Financial Officer