alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                            STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION
                              OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


                                                                                    ----------------  ---------------
                                                                                          1996              1997
                                                                                    -----------------  --------------
<S>                                                                         <C>                         <C>

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding                                 (A)            11,135           11,669
Dilutive Effect of Stock Options computed by use
      of treasury stock method                                                               216              217
Assumed conversion of Convertible Subordinated Debt
      into Common Shares                                                                     318              318
                                                                                    --------------      -------------
Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent
      Shares Outstanding assuming dilution                                 (B)            11,669           12,204
                                                                                    ==============      ============

Net Income                                                                 (C)           $ 1,754          $ 1,211
Interest Expense - Convertible Subordinated Debt (net of tax)                                 27               27
                                                                                    --------------      ------------
Adjusted Net Income                                                        (D)           $ 1,781          $ 1,238
                                                                                    ==============     ============

Net Income Per Share:

      Net Income                                                         (C)/(A)          $ 0.16           $ 0.10
                                                                                      =============        ==========

      Net Income, Assuming Dilution                                      (D)/(B)          $ 0.15           $ 0.10
                                                                                       ===========        ============

</TABLE>
*

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case,

res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value

consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

September 26, 2011

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR LOPEZ,

Petitioner–Appellant, No. 11-1186

v. (D. Colorado)

TRAVIS TRANI, Warden; THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF COLORADO,

Respondents–Appellees.

(D.C. No. 09-CV-01551-ZLW)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before O’BRIEN, McKAY, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

After this court denied his request for a certificate of appealability, see Lopez v.

Trani, 628 F.3d 1228 (10th Cir. 2010), Petitioner filed a post-judgment motion asking the

district court to strike certain statutes as unconstitutional. The court denied his motion,

and Petitioner filed a notice of appeal. 

To appeal the denial of his post-judgment motion in this habeas case, Petitioner
-2-

must obtain a certificate of appealability. See Dulworth v. Jones, 496 F.3d 1133, 1135-36

(10th Cir. 2007). We conclude that reasonable jurists would not debate whether the

district court erred in denying Petitioner’s post-judgment motion, see Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), and we therefore DENY Petitioner’s request for a certificate of

appealability and DISMISS the appeal. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis

is also DENIED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 712 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 712

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize the exclusion 
from gross income of parking and transportation fringe benefits and to 
provide for a common cost-of-living adjustment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2007

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize the exclusion 
from gross income of parking and transportation fringe benefits and to 
provide for a common cost-of-living adjustment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commuter Benefits Equity Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. UNIFORM DOLLAR LIMITATION FOR ALL TYPES OF TRANSPORTATION 
              FRINGE BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 132(f)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to limitation on exclusion) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$100'' in subparagraph (A) and inserting 
        ``$200'', and
            (2) by striking ``$175'' in subparagraph (B) and inserting 
        ``$200''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment Conforming Amendments.--Subparagraph (A) 
of section 132(f)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
inflation adjustment) is amended--
            (1) by striking the last sentence,
            (2) by striking ``1999'' and inserting ``2008'', and
            (3) by striking ``1998'' and inserting ``2007''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS.

    Section 7905 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2)(C) by inserting ``and'' after 
                the semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (3) by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (4); and
            (2) in subsection (b)(2)(A) by amending subparagraph (A) to 
        read as follows:
                    ``(A) a qualified transportation fringe as defined 
                in section 132(f)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
                1986;''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,893
<PP&E>                                           7,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,125)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,642
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,181
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,555)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,268
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (71,143)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (71,143)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (71,143)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
# CE2004070EN.01021501.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/215 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/215

---

(2004/C 70 E/230)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3085/03

by Bruno Gollnisch (NI) to the Commission

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   Crédit Lyonnais/Executive Life

Subject:

A US court is demanding that the Crédit Lyonnais bank pay a fine of USD 575 million for the allegedly illegal takeover of an insurance company by a bank.

There are two possible views of this case.

Either the Crédit Lyonnais management are genuinely at fault.

Why then should the French authorities take on the personal responsibilities of the Crédit Lyonnais management? Does the Commission, which has recently been so strict about restrictions on state aids, consider it compatible with EU law that the French state — and hence French taxpayers — should pay 4/5 of the fine imposed on the bank?

Alternatively, the Crédit Lyonnais are not at fault. If this is the case, will the Commission, which no doubt knew of the operation when the takeover actually took place, explain its present silence on the matter? Will it also specify whether, in accordance with the reciprocity rule, US banks are prohibited from owning more than 25 % of the capital of European insurance companies and, if so, what penalties are applied for violation of this prohibition?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(25 November 2003)

(25 November 2003)

The Commission adopted the decisions concerning aid granted by France to the Crédit Lyonnais on 26 July 1995 and on 20 May 1998. The risk for the Crédit Lyonnais and for the French state of a potential fine payment to the United States for the alleged mismanagement related to the take-over of the Californian insurance company Executive Life in 1991 was already provisioned and taken into account in the restructuring plan of the Crédit Lyonnais. When the Commission assessed the restructuring plan of the Crédit Lyonnais, the French authorities provided the information on bad assets and risks. A special hive-off vehicle, ‘Consortium de Réalisation’ (CDR), a hiving-off consortium for taking over the compromised assets of Crédit Lyonnais, was set up in order to restructure the bank and return it back to viability. The risk related to the take-over of the Californian insurance company Executive Life in 1991 represented a part of hived-off assets.

Considering the above stated, the Commission is currently not assessing any State aid issue and legal consequences of the acquisition of the Executive Life, which was carried out in 1991, since this issue was taken into account in the decisions already adopted by the Commission.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                            EXHIBIT 27.1

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 3, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                                              2,097
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      73,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        1,286
<INVENTORY>                                                        84,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  173,597
<PP&E>                                                             60,902
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      8,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    297,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              66,200
<BONDS>                                                           174,586
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                               76
<OTHER-SE>                                                         17,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      297,476
<SALES>                                                           263,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  263,976
<CGS>                                                             195,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     195,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  7,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    17,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        6,481
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                10,802
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       10,802
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                        1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        1.43
        

</TABLE>
WARREN LEE EDWARDS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5009

_____ ________________________/

Opinion filed April 21, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela Cox , Judge

.

Warren Lee Edwards, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PE R CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Amendment, effective as of December 31, 2009, to Viacom Bonus Deferral Plan



  
 Exhibit 10.17

 AMENDMENT TO THE 

VIACOM BONUS DEFERRAL PLAN FOR DESIGNATED
SENIOR EXECUTIVES 
 Effective as of December 31, 2009, the Plan shall be amended as follows: 

1.    Section 4.1 is amended by inserting the language underscored below: 

(b)        For a Plan Year beginning prior to January 1, 2008 in which an employee first
becomes an Eligible Employee, such Eligible Employee must elect to make a Bonus Deferral Contribution with respect to any Bonus scheduled to be paid in the next succeeding calendar year within 30 days of the date he first becomes an Eligible
Employee in order for the election to be valid. For years beginning January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2009, prior to January 1 of each such Plan Year, an Eligible Employee may elect to make a Bonus Deferral Contribution with respect to
any Bonus scheduled to be paid in the second succeeding calendar year. For the year beginning January 1, 2010, prior to January 1, 2010, an Eligible Employee may elect to make a Bonus Deferral Contribution with respect to any Bonus
scheduled to be paid no later than December 15, 2010. For a fiscal year of the Company beginning on and after October 1, 2010, an Eligible Employee may elect to make a Bonus Deferral Contribution prior to the first day of such fiscal year
with respect to any Bonus for the performance period of the Company’s fiscal year scheduled to be paid no later than December 15 of the next succeeding fiscal year. 
 For example, prior to January 1, 2009, an Eligible Employee may make a Bonus Deferral Contribution election with respect to any Bonus to be earned in 2009 that is scheduled to be paid in 2010. Prior
to January 1, 2010, an Eligible Employee may make a Bonus Deferral Contribution election with respect to any Bonus for the performance period from January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010. Prior to October 1, 2010, an Eligible
Employee may make a Bonus Deferral Contribution election with respect to any Bonus for the performance period from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 scheduled to be paid no later than December 15, 2011. An Eligible Employee
may make an Excess Bonus Deferral Contribution election whether or not such employee previously has made, or currently has in effect, any Excess Salary Reduction Contribution election.
STATE v. Reginal FULLARD.

No. 455P14-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Reginald Fullard, Lumberton, for Fullard, Reginald.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of November 2015 by Defendant for Appointment of Competent Criminal Attorney:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
# Decision (EU) 2015/1196 of the European Central Bank (repealed)Show full title

Decision (EU) 2015/1196 of the European Central Bank of 2 July 2015 amending Decision ECB/2010/21 on the annual accounts of            the European Central Bank (ECB/2015/26) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Decision (EU) 2015/1196 of the European Central Bank

# of 2 July 2015

# amending Decision ECB/2010/21 on the annual accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB/2015/26) (repealed)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article                           26.2 thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Decision ECB/2010/21(1) lays down the rules for drawing up the annual accounts of the European Central Bank.

(2)There is a need to clarify the financial reporting of securities issued by supranational or international organisations purchased                              as part of the secondary markets public sector asset purchase programme established by Decision (EU) 2015/774 of the European                              Central Bank (ECB/2015/10)(2) with a view to ensure the reporting of these holdings under asset item 7.1.

(3)Some further technical changes to Annex I to Decision ECB/2010/21 are also required.

(4)Therefore, Decision ECB/2010/21 should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

## Article 1U.K.Amendment

Annex I to Decision ECB/2010/21 is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

## Article 2U.K.Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 2 July 2015.

*The President of the ECB*                            

Mario Draghi                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### “ANNEX I**COMPOSITION AND VALUATION RULES FOR THE BALANCE SHEET**

#### ASSETS

#### LIABILITIES

1

Decision ECB/2010/21 of 11 November 2010 on the annual accounts of the European Central Bank (OJ L 35, 9.2.2011, p. 1).                           

2

Decision (EU) 2015/774 of the European Central Bank of 4 March 2015 on a secondary markets public sector asset purchase programme                              (ECB/2015/10) (OJ L 121, 14.5.2015, p. 20).
IN RE J.Y.

No. COA08-900.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Cumberland (05JT688, 05JT689).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

        CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual Report of W. R. Grace &
Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information
contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul J. Norris
------------------------------------
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Robert M. Tarola
------------------------------------
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 4, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Intermec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick J. Byrne,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Patrick J,
Byrne
 Patrick
J. Byrne
 Chief
Executive Officer
   February 19, 2010