alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference call of the Colorado State Advisory Committee will convene at 9 a.m. (m.d.t.) and adjourn at 10 a.m. (m.d.t.), Friday, September 16, 2005. The purpose of the conference call is to provide a status report on the Commission and regional programs, and planning for future activities.

This conference call is available to the public through the following call-in number: 1-800-473-7796; call-in ID#: 4390-5596. Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and access code. 

To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting John F. Dulles, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, (303) 866-1040 (TDD 303-866-1049), by 3 p.m. (m.d.t.) on Monday, September 12, 2005. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, September 7, 2005.

Ivy L. Davis,

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 05-18135 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
STATE v. Reginal FULLARD.

No. 455P14-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Reginald Fullard, Lumberton, for Fullard, Reginald.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th of November 2015 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
ex10-2112310.htm










Exhibit 10.2


FIRST MODIFICATION TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 

 


 

 


 THIS MODIFICATION TO PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Modification”) is entered into as of November 23, 2010, by and between MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC., MEDTOX DIAGNOSTICS, INC., and MEDTOX LABORATORIES, INC. (“Borrower”), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“Bank”).


 

 


RECITALS


 

 


 WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Line of Credit Note in the maximum principal amount of $8,000,000.00, executed by Borrower and payable to the order of Bank, dated as of October 29, 2009 (the "Note"), which Note is subject to the terms and conditions of a loan agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as of December 1, 2005, as amended from time to time (the "Loan Agreement").


 

 


 WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set forth in the Note, and have agreed to modify the Note to reflect said changes.


 

 


 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Note shall be modified as follows:


 

 


 1. The maximum principal amount available under the Note is hereby modified to be Twelve Million Dollars ($12,000,000.00).


 

 


 2 The effective date of the changes set forth herein shall be November 23, 2010.


 

 


 3. Except as expressly set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the Note remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification.  All terms defined in the Note or the Loan Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Modification.  This Modification and the Note shall be read together, as one document.


 

 


 4. Borrower certifies that as of the date of this Modification there exists no Event of Default under the Note, nor any condition, act or event which with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both would constitute any such Event of Default.


 

 


 

 







































  





  











  
















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Modification to be executed as of the day and year first written above.


 

 


                                                                                                     WELLS FARGO BANK,


MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.                                                                                                    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION







By: /s/ Kevin J. Wiersma                                                                                                   By: /s/ Steven P. Johnson


                                Steven P. Johnson,


Title: V.P. & CFO                                                                            Vice President


 

 


MEDTOX DIAGNOSTICS, INC.


 

 


By: /s/ Kevin J. Wiersma


 

 


Title: V.P. & CFO


 

 


MEDTOX LABORATORIES, INC.


 

 


By:/s/ Kevin J. Wiersma


 

 


Title: V.P. & CFO
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 0 8

- 5 0 5 9 7 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.

M I C H A E L M E R I D Y T H
,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 7 : 9 9

- C R

- 3 6

- A L L

B e f o r e S M I T H
, P R A D O
, a n d H A Y N E S
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

M i c h a e l M e r i d y t h
, f e d e r a l p r i s o n e r # 1 0 0 3 0

- 0 5 1 , a p p e a l s t h e d i s t r i c t

c o u r t ’ s g r a n t o f h i s 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) m o t i o n t o r e d u c e h i s s e n t e n c e b a s e d o n

t h e a m e n d m e n t s t o t h e c r a c k c o c a i n e G u i d e l i n e

. H e a r g u e s t h a t t h e r e d u c e d

s e n t e n c e i m p o s e d b y t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t w a s g r e a t e r t h a n n e c e s s a r y t o a c h i e v e t h e

g o a l s o f 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) b e c a u s e h i s o f f e n s e o f c o n v i c t i o n w a s r e l a t i v e l y

m i n o r , h i s s e n t e n c e w o u l d h a v e b e e n m u c h l o w e r i f h i s o f f e n s e h a d i n v o l v e d

p o w d e r c o c a i n e r a t h e r t h a n c o c a i n e b a s e , h i s p r i o r c o n v i c t i o n f o r a g g r a v a t e d U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 20 , 20 10
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 08-50597 Document: 00511086473 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010N o

. 0 8

- 5 0 5 9 7

b a t t e r y o c c u r r e d a v e r y l o n g t i m e a g o , h e h a s b e e n r e h a b i l i t a t e d w h i l e i n p r i s o n ,

a n d h e w i l l b e e m p l o y e d a n d h a v e f a m i l y s u p p o r t u p o n h i s r e l e a s e f r o m p r i s o n

. W e r e v i e w t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d e c i s i o n w h e t h e r t o r e d u c e a s e n t e n c e u n d e r § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) f

o r a n a b u s e o f d i s c r e t i o n

. U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. E v a n s , 5 8 7 F

. 3 d 6 6 7 , 6 7 2 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 9 )
, p e t i t i o n f o r c e r t

. f

i l e d ( J a n

. 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 ) ( N o

. 0 9

- 8 9 3 9 )

. T h e d i s t r i c t

c o u r t e x p l i c i t l y c o n s i d e r e d M e r i d y t h ’ s a r g u m e n t s p r e s e n t e d a t r e s e n t e n c i n g a n d

t h e § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) f a c t o r s b e f o r e i t i m p o s e d t h e r e d u c e d s e n t e n c e , w h i c h w a s w i t h i n

t h e l o w e r e d g u i d e l i n e s r a n g e

. T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d i d n o t a b u s e i t s d i s c r e t i o n i n

t h i s c a s e

. S e e i d

. A F F I R M E D

.

2 Case: 08-50597 Document: 00511086473 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6495

DONALD IVAN MCCRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT; REBECCA KOCH, Sergeant, Chapel

Hill Police,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp,

Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00984-PTS)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Ivan McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson,

CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

The parties consented to referral to a magistrate judge for

final disposition under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c) (2000).

2

PER CURIAM:

Donald Ivan McCray appeals the district court’s* order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCray v.

Chapel Hill Police Dep’t, No. 1:06-cv-00984-PTS (M.D.N.C., Mar. 19,

2008). We also deny McCray’s motion to appoint counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-322-CV

IN RE GERALD ANTHONY WRIGHT RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

We have considered relator’s August 11, 2008 letter, which the court

construes as relator’s motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. It

is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss

this original proceeding.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 21, 2008
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2178

JAMES A. ORAZI; KIMBERLY RIDER

- ORAZI , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L LP, now merged with Bank of America National Association; RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC; US BANK N.A., as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2013 SC3 Title Trust , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. J. Frederick Motz, Senior Distric t Judge. ( 1:15

- cv
- 01520

- RDB )

Submitted : March 10, 2020 Decided: March 12, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Thomas J

. Schetelich , FERGUSON, SCHETELICH & BALLEW, PA , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants

. Melissa O. Martinez , Emily M

. Patterson , MCGUIREWOODS LLP , Baltimore, Maryland; Aaron Neal , M C NAMEE HOSEA , Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM: James A. Orazi and Kimberly Rider

- Orazi appeal the district court’s orders denying
their motion to amend their complaint and granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees in their civil action alleging breach of contract in connection w ith a loan
modification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Orazi v. BAC Home Loans Servicing,
LLC , No. 1:15

- cv
- 01520

- RDB (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2016; Sept. 6, 2018)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54757-54758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Research Program Projects 
(P01s).
    Date: October 7, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hawthorne Suites Hotel, 300 Meredith Drive, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27713.
    Contact Person: Janice B. Allen, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific

[[Page 54758]]

Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research and Training, Nat. 
Institute of Environmental Health Service, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30/
Room 3170 B, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 919/541-7556.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Research Program Project 
(P01's).
    Date: October 7, 2005.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hawthorne Suites Hotel, 300 Meredith Drive, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27713.
    Contact Person: Janice B. Allen, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat. Institute of Environmental Health 
Service, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30/Room 3170 B, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709, 919/541-7556.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 9, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18392 Filed 8-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. COA07-689

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 19, 2008.

Certification Date March 10, 2008.

Appeal from Stanly (07CRS373).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
VI 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 78 

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 

5 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1151), Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical shall be considered 

7 to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for 

8 permanent residence as of the date of enactment of this 

9 Act upon payment of the required visa fees. 

10 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

11 Upon the granting of permanent residence to 

12 Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical, the Secretary of State 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 78 IS

1 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

2 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

3 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

4 country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) or 203(a) 

5 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1152(e), 1153(a)). 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# CE2004088EN.01043901.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/439 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/439

---

(2004/C 88 E/0445)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2843/03

by Astrid Thors (ELDR) to the Commission

(25 September 2003)

Subject:   Placement of children in institutions in Latvia

Subject:

The Council attaches very great importance to the applicant countries' respect for the political criteria for accession laid down by the European Council meeting in Copenhagen, particularly those concerning democracy, the rule of law, human rights and protection of minorities (Council's written answer of 4 June 2003 to question H-0350/03).

Has the Commission at any stage considered the situation of children in children's homes in Latvia, particularly given that the Commission has actively endeavoured to develop similar strategies in other applicant countries?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(22 October 2003)

(22 October 2003)

Since the opinion of 1997, the Commission has concluded in its annual Regular Reports that Latvia continues to comply with the so-called Copenhagen political criteria, namely the respect for democracy, the rule of law, human rights and the protection of minorities. Latvia has continued to address any existing outstanding issue in this area.

In the context of children's rights, Latvia has ratified several Conventions such as the European Convention on the Exercise of Children's Rights (May 2001) and also the European Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions concerning Custody of Children and on Restoration of Custody of Children (April 2002). Within the obvious budgetary constraints of a country in transition, Latvia continues to invest in upgrading social institutions, including children's homes.

Latvia is primarily responsible for its children's policy. However, the Commission has provided assistance for projects via non-governmental organisations (NGOs) active in this field, under the horizontal Access programme in order to support the situation of children and children's homes in Latvia. This support has been directed at child care institutions such as orphanages, schools with ‘risk’ children, day support centres for children suffering from unfavourable conditions and families with socio-psychological and rehabilitation reintegration as well as socially and health wise endangered children, including street and abused children.

The Commission will continue to monitor the situation in Latvia until accession. The ongoing encouraging developments regarding economic and social cohesion as well as availability of future Structural Funds will certainly also contribute to further improvements and upgrading of social institutions, including children's homes in Latvia.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6155

HARVEY JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

MELISSA JONES,

Plaintiff,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner, South Carolina

Department of Corrections; WILLIAM D. CATOE,

Deputy Commissioner for Operations,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-96-485-2-22AJ)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Harvey Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW &

JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Moore, No. CA-96-

485-2-22AJ (D.S.C. Jan. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED