alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2






EXHIBIT 10.2




TRW Automotive




12001 Tech Center Drive

Livonia, MI 48150









August 25, 2010




Mr. David S. Taylor

The Procter & Gamble Company

One P&G Plaza

C9-413, Box 19

Cincinnati, OH 45202




STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL




Dear David:




This letter confirms the offer for appointment as a member of the Board of Directors of TRW
Automotive Holdings Corp. and TRW Automotive Inc. Your term would begin following approval of your
nomination by the full Board at its meeting scheduled on November 17th at our
headquarters in Livonia, Michigan. The current draft copy of the Board schedule for 2011 is
enclosed.




Compensation




Our compensation arrangement for independent directors is as follows:




Annual Cash Retainer: Directors will be paid a cash retainer of $75,000 per year.




Meeting Fees: Directors will be paid a fee of $1,500 per meeting attended.




Expenses: The Company will reimburse you for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for
attendance at Board meetings pursuant to the Company’s Travel Policy.




Annual RSU Grant: You will receive an annual grant of restricted stock units that will add
a significant equity-based component to your compensation. The number of such units granted to
each independent director in 2009 and 2010 was 3,500 and 4,100, respectively.




Share Ownership Guidelines: The Company’s share ownership guideline for Directors is 8,000
shares. This can be accumulated over a five-year period.




Directors and Officers Insurance




The Company has a Directors and Officers insurance policy in place. A chart explaining this policy
is enclosed for your information.



 


 









 








Mr. David S. Taylor

Page 2 of 2




Director Secrecy Agreement.




Because of the sensitivity of the information to which you have or will have access, we ask that
you execute a Director Secrecy Agreement similar to the Confidential Information Agreement
executed by all Company employees at the time of their employment. A copy is enclosed. Please
sign it and send it to Robin Walker-Lee.




David, we think your years of experience at P&G, which has one of the strongest brand portfolios,
will enable you to make a strong contribution to the future prosperity of TRW Automotive. We are
looking forward to your joining the Board.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Sincerely,

 	 	 
	/s/ John C. Plant
 	 	 
	John C. Plant 	 	 
	President & Chief Executive Officer


	 
	Enclosures
STATE v. Reginald U. FULLARD.

No. 42P15-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Reginald Fullard, for Fullard, Reginald U.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of July 2015 by Defendant for Order of Transcripts:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# CE2004078EN.01078301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/783 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/783

---

(2004/C 78 E/0833)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3137/03

by Mihail Papayannakis (GUE/NGL) to the Council

(23 October 2003)

Subject:   Right to apply for asylum

Subject:

Does the Council believe that, in its present form, the amended proposal for a directive COM(2002) 326 final (1) on minimum standards on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status is compatible with the Member States' obligations arising from international conventions on refugees and asylum seekers? In particular, can the Council explain how it is guaranteeing the right to apply for asylum for all asylum seekers, including their access to the territory of the Member States? How is it guaranteeing their access to fair procedures for considering their applications and the right to appeal where asylum seekers are sent back to their country of origin while publication of the judicial decision granting asylum is pending?

1

Reply

(4 March 2004)

(4 March 2004)

The Council's activities as regards the right to asylum are focused at present on the proposal for a Directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status.

The Council will take care to ensure that any future Community regulations in this area respect the rights and guarantees established by the international law instruments concerned, in particular the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

---

(1)  OJ C 291, 26.11.2002, p. 143.

1

---
esph1010.htm




    EXHIBIT 10.10






 


 


 










 




  





1











  






 


 





 




  





2











  






 


 





 




  





3











  






 





 




  





4











  






 


 





 




  





5











  






 


 





 




  





6











  






 





 


 




  





7











  






 


 





 




  





8











  






 


 





 


 


 




 





9











 






 





 


 


 




  





10











  






 


 





 


 




  





11











  






 


 





 


 




  





12











  






 


 





 


 


 


 




  





13











  






 


 





 


 


 


 




  





14











  






 


 


 





 


 




  





15











  






 


 





 


 




  





16











  






 





 


 




  





17











  






 


 





 


 


 




  





18











  






 


 





 


 




  





19











  






 





 


 


 




  





20











  






 


 


 





 


 


 


 




  





21











  






 


 





 


 




  





22











  






 


 


 





 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


24
# CE2004078EN.01045601.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/456 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/456

---

(2004/C 78 E/0483)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3059/03

by Avril Doyle (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 October 2003)

Subject:   EU funding for marine conservation

Subject:

Given that Ireland lacks any dedicated facility, in the form of a publicly accessible marine conservation area, through which it can play a full role in an EU network of marine mammal rescue and oil spill response, and given that consequently it is ill-equipped to fulfil its international responsibilities.

Can the Commission advise on whether there are any EU funds available for the purpose of developing such a conservation centre to service the country?

Can the Commission advise on the availability of EU funding to support the work of the Irish Seal Sanctuary, a wildlife conservation NGO run entirely by volunteers for the past 20 years in this area but now without sources of finance to continue its operations?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(27 November 2003)

(27 November 2003)

As the Honourable Member is aware, a number of International and Community measures and policies require Ireland to take adequate provisions to conserve or restore the marine environment. In principle, funds provided by the Community and managed by Ireland could be used to honour these responsibilities, provided that the legal framework allows for this.

There are limited possibilities for direct support from the Commission for nature conservation projects. The key financial instrument is the LIFE Regulation (1) nearly half of which is devoted to nature conservation projects. The key objective of LIFE Nature is to support the establishment of the Natura 2000 network of protected areas.

1

There are certain rules and criteria that need to be met for LIFE funding. Applications for financial support under LIFE are considered each year and must be submitted via the national authority for nature protection. The deadline for submission of applications to the Commission under the final round of the present LIFE Regulation was the end of October 2003.

Unfortunately, the number of applications received by the Commission considerably exceeds the financial possibilities of this instrument.

In regard to the Structural Funds, the Commission understands that the Irish Seal Sanctuary is currently examining the possibility of seeking funding under the Tourism Measures of the Regional Operational Programmes.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1655/2000 of the Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE), OJ L 192, 28.7.2000.

1

---
----

(2004/C 33 E/041)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0478/03

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(20 February 2003)

Subject:   Lifting of secrecy surrounding dubious financial transactions via the Republic of Cyprus

Source: Netherlands TV2, Twee Vandaag' news programme, 8 February 2003.

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(21 March 2003)

The Commission has addressed the matter of money laundering in detail in all the Regular Reports on Cyprus' progress towards accession.

In the 2002 Report (1) it was stated that Cyprus has implemented all the necessary legislation in the area of money laundering and put in place the necessary administrative capacity.

Further progress is still expected in terms of completing the reinforcement of the administrative structure of the Unit for Combating Money Laundering (MOKAS) with the recruitment of the approved additional staff.

The Commission continues to monitor how Cyprus is meeting the commitments it has made in the accession negotiations. A recent monitoring mission to Cyprus has shown that the country is generally meeting its commitments. A comprehensive monitoring report will be presented six months before accession.

----

(1)  COM(2002) 700 final.

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Jose Edis CARRANZA.

No. 184P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 13, 2015.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 1st of June 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
In the Matter of the Summons Issued to ERNST & YOUNG, LLP and All Subsidiaries, Affiliated and Associated Entities. appealed by the Secretary of the NC Dept. of Revenue appealed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

No. 424PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Gregory P. Roney, Assistant Attorney General, for Secretary of NC Dept. of Revenue.

Jasper L. Cummings, Jr., Raleigh, Robin L. Greenhouse, Washington, DC, for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Robert Spearman, Raleigh, Michael B. Frank, Associate General Counsel, for Ernst & Young.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 663 S.E.2d 921.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of September 2008 by Appellant (Secretary of the N.C. Department of Revenue) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Presidential Documents 54229 

Notice of September 8, 2005 

Notice Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect 

to Certain Terrorist Attacks 

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 

1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency I declared 

on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the terrorist 

attacks at the World Trade Center, New York, New York, and the Pentagon, 

and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United 

States. 

By Executive Order 13223 of September 14, 2001 and Executive Order 

13253 of January 16, 2002, I delegated authority to the Secretary of Defense 

and the Secretary of Transportation to order members of the Reserve Components to active duty and to waive certain statutory military personnel requirements. By Executive Order 13235 of November 16, 2001, I delegated authority 

to the Secretary of Defense to exercise certain emergency construction authority. By Executive Order 13286 of February 28, 2003, I transferred the authority 

delegated to the Secretary of Transportation in Executive Order 13223 to 

the Secretary of Homeland Security. 

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency declared on 

September 14, 2001, and the measures taken on September 14, 2001, November 16, 2001, and January 16, 2002, to deal with that emergency, must 

continue in effect beyond September 14, 2005. Therefore, I am continuing 

in effect for an additional year the national emergency I declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to the terrorist threat. This notice shall be 

published in the Federal Register 

W 

and transmitted to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

September 8, 2005. [FR Doc. 05–18239 

Filed 9–12–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2312Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/2312 of 30 November 2015 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application            of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Liberia and the Implementation            Protocol thereto         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2312                     

# of 30 November 2015

# on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement                        between the European Union and the Republic of Liberia and the Implementation Protocol thereto                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43, in conjunction with Article                           218(5) thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)The Union and the Republic of Liberia have negotiated a Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (hereinafter referred                              to as ‘the Agreement’) and an Implementation Protocol thereto (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Protocol’), granting Union                              vessels fishing opportunities in the waters over which the Republic of Liberia has sovereignty or jurisdiction.

(2)Negotiations were successfully finalised and the Agreement and the Protocol were initialled on 5 June 2015.

(3)Article 15 of the Agreement and Article 12 of the Protocol provide for the provisional application of the Agreement and the                              Protocol from the date of their signature.

(4)The Agreement and the Protocol should be signed, and applied on a provisional basis, pending the completion of the procedures                              necessary for their conclusion,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the                     Republic of Liberia and of the Implementation Protocol thereto is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of the said                     Agreement and Protocol.                  

The texts of the Agreement and the Protocol are attached to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement and the Protocol                     on behalf of the Union.                  

# Article 3U.K.

The Agreement and the Protocol shall be applied on a provisional basis as from the date of their signature, pending the completion                     of the procedures necessary for their conclusion.                  

# Article 4U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

É. Schneider
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Peter Papano, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PETER PAPANO                                  
|Peter Papano Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary

November 9, 2004
# Court of Appeals

JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE DAVID PURYEAR. JUSTICE BOH PEMBERTON, JUSTICE MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE SCOTT K. FIELD. JUSTICE CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE

Mr. Robert A. Caine Law Offices of Robert A. Caine 

### 510 S. Congress Avenue, Suite 103 Austin, TX 78704

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *


### Ms. Angie D. Roberts-Huckaby 

## Assistant Criminal District Attorney Hays County Government Center 712 South Stagecoach Trail, Suite 2057 San Marcos, TX 78666

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * 

### Third District of Texas P.O. BOX 12547. AUSTIN. TEXAS 78711-2547 www.txcouits.gov/3rdcoa.aspx (512) 463-1733

JEFFREY D. KYLE. CLERK



### July 24. 2015

iVMs. 

### Brcnda Elaine King 1307 Uhland Road San Marcos, TX 78666



## RE: Court of Appeals Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

### Style: Brenda Elaine King

v. The State of Texas 03-14-00240-CR CR-12-1083

Dear Counsel:


### Oral argument having been denied by this Court, this cause is set for submission on briefs,
on Friday, August 14, 2015. before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field.

Very truly yours,

•SL. C 

# Kg6 Jeffrey D. Kyle, ClerkCourtofAppealsThirdDistrictp.o.box12547.austin.texas78711-2547NOLONGERINOURCUSTODYRETURNseSBeras-Ma$4sFWgtMS.BRENDAELAINEKING/TWTJFIUtfJrTRD.)sanM^RGosjfxIzael.•3J--""••>....**RECEIVED\JUL3 02015PEALS>\EffREYD.KYIEX
STATE v. GARY.

No. COA08-361.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Polk (07CRS50217).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
II 

Calendar No. 25 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 574 

To express the sense of Congress on Iraq. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2007 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

FEBRUARY 14, 2007 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To express the sense of Congress on Iraq. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IRAQ. 

4 It is the sense of Congress that— 

5 (1) Congress and the American people will con6 tinue to support and protect the members of the 

7 United States Armed Forces who are serving or who 

8 have served bravely and honorably in Iraq; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

S 574 PCS

1 (2) Congress disapproves of the decision of 

2 President George W. Bush announced on January 

3 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional 

4 United States combat troops to Iraq. 

5 SEC. 2. FREQUENCY OF REPORTS ON CERTAIN ASPECTS OF 

6 POLICY AND OPERATIONS. 

7 The United States Policy in Iraq Act (section 1227 

8 of Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3465; 50 U.S.C. 1541 

9 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

10 subsection: 

11 ‘‘(d) FREQUENCY OF REPORTS ON CERTAIN AS12 PECTS OF UNITED STATES POLICY AND MILITARY OPER13 ATIONS IN IRAQ.—Not later than 30 days after the date 

14 of the enactment of this subsection, and every 30 days 

15 thereafter until all United States combat brigades have 

16 redeployed from Iraq, the President shall submit to Con17 gress a report on the matters set forth in paragraphs 

18 (1)(A), (1)(B), and (2) of subsection (c). To the maximum 

19 extent practicable each report shall be unclassified, with 

20 a classified annex if necessary.’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Calendar No. 25 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 574 

A BILL 

To express the sense of Congress on Iraq. 

FEBRUARY 14, 2007 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




The
      Board
      of Directors




IGIA,
      Inc.:




We
      consent to the use of our report dated May 12, 2004, with respect to the balance
      sheet of Tactica International, Inc. as of February 29, 2004 and the related
      statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year
      then ended included herein.




Our
      report dated May 12, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that
      the
      Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital
      deficiency, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as
      a
      going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
      might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.








El
      Paso,
      Texas


June
      15,
      2005