alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 65 E/227)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2761/03

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(16 September 2003)

Subject:   Large increase in the transport of unsorted industrial waste from the Netherlands to Germany in order to cut costs of separation and processing

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(29 October 2003)

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out the European Community, OJ L 30, 6.2.1993.

(2)  COM(2003) 301 final.

(3)  Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, OJ L 257, 10.10.1996.

(4)  Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, OJ L 194, 25.7.1975.

(5)  COM(2003) 379 final.

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54907-54908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18538]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Secretary of the Navy's Advisory Subcommittee on 
Naval History

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Navy's Advisory Subcommittee on Naval 
History, a subcommittee of the Department of Defense Historical 
Advisory Committee will meet to review naval historical activities 
since the last meeting of the Advisory Subcommittee on Naval History, 
which was conducted on April 29, and April 30, 2004 and to make 
comments and recommendations on these activities to the Secretary of 
the Navy. The meetings will be open to the public.

DATES: The meetings will be held on Thursday, September 29, 2005, from 
8 a.m. to 4 p.m. and Friday, September 30, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Navy Museum of The Naval 
Historical Center, 805 Kidder Breese Street, SE., Building 76, 
Washington Navy Yard, DC, 20374-5060.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rear Admiral Paul E. Tobin, USN 
(Ret.), Director of Naval History, 805 Kidder Breese Street, SE., Bldg. 
57, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5060, telephone 202-433-2210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of open meeting is provided in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). 
The purpose of these meetings is to review naval historical activities 
since the last meeting of the Advisory Subcommittee on Naval History 
and to make comments and recommendations on these activities to the 
Secretary of the Navy.


[[Page 54908]]


    Dated: September 12, 2005.
I.C. Le Moyne Jr.,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18538 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
# C_2012165EN.01001601.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 April 2012 — Movimondo Onlus v Commission

(Case T-329/05) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Framework agreement between ECHO and humanitarian organisations - Grant agreements - Suspension of payments)

2012/C 165/25

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Movimondo Onlus — Organizzazione non governativa di cooperazione e solidarietà internazionale (Rome, Italy) (represented by: initally P. Vitali, G. Verusio, G.M. Roberti and A. Franchi, subsequently P. Vitali, G. Verusio and A. Franchi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin and F. Moro, Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Principal claim, under Article 238 EC, for the payment of amounts under grant agreements and, in the alternative, annulment of two letters from the Commission dated 17 June and 27 July 2005.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Movimondo Onlus — Organizzazione non governativa di cooperazione e solidarietà internazionale to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Movimondo Onlus — Organizzazione non governativa di cooperazione e solidarietà internazionale to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 257, 15.10.2005.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Drew MARTIN.

No. 273P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Marilyn G. Ozer, Chapel Hill, for Martin, Drew.

John P. Barkley, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Kimberly S. Robb, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 5th of August 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of August 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th of August 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Pitt County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Certification for Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Ohio State Bancshares, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  [This paragraph intentionally left blank.]
   5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: March 29, 2006
    
    
    
    /s/ TODD WANNERTodd M. Wanner, CPAChief Financial Officer
# CE2004078EN.01009901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/99 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/99

---

(2004/C 78 E/0098)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2250/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI), Marco Pannella (NI), Marco Cappato (NI), Benedetto Della Vedova (NI), Gianfranco Dell'Alba (NI) and Olivier Dupuis (NI) to the Commission

(7 July 2003)

Subject:   Violation of religious freedom in China. Arrest of Father Lu Xiaozhou of the ‘clandestine’ Catholic church

Subject:

The Catholic news agency UCA reports that Father Lu Xiaozhou of the ‘clandestine’ Catholic church was arrested on 16 June 2003 at Wenzhou (1 416 kilometres south-east of Beijing) as he was on his way to the hospital to attend to the sick.

The same afternoon, the security forces searched his house and seized all his belongings.

On 17 June 2003 Father Lu Xiaozhou was transferred to the Religious Affairs Bureau, with a view to forcing him to sign a letter agreeing to join the government-recognised Catholic Patriotic Association.

According to the agency dispatch, the priest will probably not be released until he has signed that letter.

These events occurred just a few days after 12 Protestants belonging to the clandestine church were arrested in a village in Yunnan Province.

In view of the above, can the Commission indicate:

| — | what information it has on this umpteenth violation of the right to religious freedom, recognised in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

what information it has on this umpteenth violation of the right to religious freedom, recognised in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;

| — | what it will do to secure the immediate release of the Catholic priest and 12 Protestants arrested in June 2003; |
| --- | --- |

—

what it will do to secure the immediate release of the Catholic priest and 12 Protestants arrested in June 2003;

| — | whether it will formally censure the Chinese Government for the intimidatory practices which the Religious Affairs Bureau uses to compel members of the clandestine churches to renounce their faith and join the official State-recognised churches? |
| --- | --- |

—

whether it will formally censure the Chinese Government for the intimidatory practices which the Religious Affairs Bureau uses to compel members of the clandestine churches to renounce their faith and join the official State-recognised churches?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(7 August 2003)

(7 August 2003)

The Commission know nothing about Father Lu Xiaozhou's situation but will endeavour to find out. As it indicated in its answer to Written Question E-2216/03 (1) from the Honourable Members, religious freedom is one of the priorities pursued by the European Union its dialogue with China on human rights. It will raise, as it has already done on several occasions in the past, the cases of persons who are persecuted for practising their faith.

1

---

(1)  See page 93.

1

---
In the Matter of C.W.S., L.S.

No. COA15-1029.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 15, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50886

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS CONTRERAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-2696-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Contreras

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior

conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit32.1**

#### **CERTIFICATIONS OF PERIODIC REPORT**

I, John R. Serino,President and Chief Executive Officer of Encision Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

·                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

·                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Dated: | February 13, 2006 |                        |
|--------|-------------------|-----------------------------|
|   |              | /s/ John R. Serino          |
|   |              |                        |
|   |              | John R. Serino              |
|   |              | Principal Executive Officer |

 

 

 

I, Marcia McHaffie,Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of Encision Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

·                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or78o(d)); and

·                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: | February 13, 2006 |                                                                      |
|--------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |              | /s/ Marcia McHaffie                                                       |
|   |              |                                                                      |
|   |              | Marcia McHaffie                                                           |
|   |              | Controller, Principal Accounting Officer and  Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit No. 11.  Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings for the three
                 months ended March 31, 1998 and 1997 (in thousands except per
                 share data).

                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,
                                                        ----------------------
                                                          1998         1997
                                                        ----------  ----------
Net income                                              $      439  $      471
                                                        ==========  ==========

Weighted average shares outstanding                      3,006,524   3,017,060

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
   effect of stock options                                 126,991     106,058
                                                        ----------  ----------
Diluted weighted average common
   shares outstanding                                    3,133,515   3,123,118
                                                        ==========  ==========

Basic earnings per share                                   $  0.15     $  0.15
                                                           =======     =======
Diluted earnings per share                                 $  0.14     $  0.15
                                                           =======     =======

                                       19
Ivan McLAUGHLIN and Timothy Stanley v. Daniel BAILEY, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Sheriff of Mecklenburg County, and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company.

No. 163A15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Harvey L. Kennedy, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, For McLaughlin, Ivan, et al.

Harold L. Kennedy, III, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, For McLaughlin, Ivan, et al.

Sean F. Perrin, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For Bailey, Daniel, et al.

***AMENDED ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiffs on the 12th of May 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendants, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiffs on the 12th of May 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

ERVIN, J., recused.
STATE v. Tae Kwon HAMMONDS.

No. 389A15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Feb. 3, 2016.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hammonds, Tae Kwon.

Joseph E. Elder, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 2nd of February 2016 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of February 2016."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 30th day of March 2016 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
STATE of North Carolina, Plaintiff, v. Robert McPHAIL, Defendant.

No. COA15-965.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 1, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
PHOENIX LTD. PARTNERSHIP OF RALEIGH v. SIMPSON.

No. COA07-1333.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 3, 2009.

Certification Date March 23, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (05CVS1524).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded in part; affirmed in part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of partially closed meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors will meet to make such inquiry, as the Board shall deem necessary into the state of morale and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, fiscal affairs, and academic methods of the Naval Academy. The meeting will include discussions of personnel issues at the Naval Academy, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The executive session of this meeting will be closed to the public. 

# DATES:

The open session of the meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, from 8 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. The closed Executive Session will be held on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, from 10:30 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held in 385 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lieutenant Commander Marc D. Boran, Executive Secretary to the Board of Visitors, Office of the Superintendent, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000, 410-293-1503. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice of meeting is provided per the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2). The executive session of the meeting will consist of discussions of personnel issues at the Naval Academy and internal Board of Visitors matters. Discussion of such information cannot be adequately segregated from other topics, which precludes opening the executive session of this meeting to the public. Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that the meeting shall be partially closed to the public because it will be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(2), (5), (6), (7) and (9) of title 5, United States Code. 

Dated: September 12, 2005. 

I.C. Le Moyne Jr., 

Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-18537 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
# C_2008107EN.01002401.xml

| 26.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/24

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 March 2008 — Guigard v Commission

(Case T-301/05) (1)

1

(Non-contractual liability - Non-renewal of a contract of employment financed by the EDF - Lack of unlawful conduct on the part of the Commission - Jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance)

(2008/C 107/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Philippe Guigard (Paris, France) (represented initially by: S. Rodrigues and A. Jaume, later by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glantz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by: D. Martin and K. Herrmann, later by: F. Dintilhac and G. Boudot, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant by reason of the allegedly wrongful conduct of the Commission in regard to the non-renewal of his contract of employment concluded in the framework of technical co-operation between the Community and the Republic of Niger financed by the European Development Fund (EDF).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Mr Philippe Guigard to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Philippe Guigard to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 271, 29.10.2005.

1

---