alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004088EN.01060302.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/603 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/603

---

(2004/C 88 E/0620)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0983/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Massa

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Massa, urgently need to use European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions, nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and culture,

can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Massa has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Massa has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Massa has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Massa has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---
STATE v. Sethy Tony SEAM.

No. 82A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 12, 2014.

Charles H. Harp, II, Attorney at Law, Lexington, for Seam, Sethy Tony.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Seam, Sethy Tony.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender.

Gary W. Frank, District Attorney.

**Opinion**

The following Order was entered:Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31(a) and (b)(2) and Rule 15(e)(2) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court on its own initiative hereby certifies for review prior to determination in the Court of Appeals *State v. Sethy Tony Seam,* COA13-1066. The case shall be docketed in this Court as of the date of this order. Briefs of the respective parties that have been submitted to the Court of Appeals shall be considered by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


 November 14, 2007                           November 14, 2007

 /s/ Jeffrey L. Minch                        /s/ Richard S. Chilinski
Jeffrey L. Minch,                            Richard S. Chilinski,
President and Chief Executive Officer        Chief Financial Officer

                                       22
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                              153010
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       846247
<ALLOWANCES>                                         45102
<INVENTORY>                                         688391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1793284
<PP&E>                                             3113768
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1378923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     3635184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1572349
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         496236
<COMMON>                                             22624
<OTHER-SE>                                          990853
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       3635184
<SALES>                                            5796356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   5796356
<CGS>                                              3724261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      3724261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   2104575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     45102
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  156512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (187670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (187670)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (187670)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.13)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 743 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 743

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 36, United States Code, to modify the individuals 
 eligible for associate membership in the Military Order of the Purple 
          Heart of the United States of America, Incorporated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR ASSOCIATE 
              MEMBERSHIP IN MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART OF THE 
              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED.

    Section 140503(b) of title 36, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, spouses, siblings,'' after ``parents''.

            Passed the Senate March 1, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 743

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 36, United States Code, to modify the individuals 
 eligible for associate membership in the Military Order of the Purple 
          Heart of the United States of America, Incorporated.

_______________________________________________________________________
```
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2014 of 7 May 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2014                     

# of 7 May 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
----

(2004/C 33 E/166)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1765/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(28 May 2003)

Subject:   Palco layoffs

The decision of the Schiesser-Palco company to close down its production plant in Greece on 30 May 2003 and transfer its manufacturing operations to Bulgaria will result in over 500 job losses among its workers, the majority of them affecting women, who, having been employed by the company for decades, will have difficulty in finding other jobs. Furthermore, despite its participation in various European Union-funded programmes, the company in question has already dismissed 3 60 workers over the last three years.

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(16 July 2003)

The above mentioned company has not been financed by the European Social Fund (ESF) in the framework of any Operational Programme in the period 2000-2006.

With regard to the application of Council Directive 94/45/EC of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees, the Commission would remind the Honourable Member that negotiations on the establishment of such a body are begun only at the written request of 100 employees or their representatives in at least two Member States or on an initiative of the central management of the groups of undertakings in question. It is not, therefore, up to the Commission to encourage these negotiations, which require only that those benefiting from the rights created by the Directive indicate their interest.

----

(1)OJ L 254, 30.9.1994, p. 64.

----
# C_2023338EN.01004301.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/43

---

Action brought on 14 August 2023 — Enterprise Holdings v EUIPO — Qommute (COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE)

(Case T-500/23)

(2023/C 338/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Enterprise Holdings, Inc. (Saint Louis, Missouri, United States) (represented by: M. Forde, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Qommute SARL (Marseille, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word trade mark COMMUTE WITH ENTERPRISE — Application for registration No 17 947 155

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 June 2023 in Case R 989/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative, alter the contested decision in the sense that the opposition is remitted to the Opposition Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, alter the contested decision in the sense that the opposition is remitted to the Opposition Division;

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs in the present proceedings and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO; in the alternative, should the other party before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervene, order the defendant and intervener jointly and severally to pay the applicant’s costs in the present proceedings and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs in the present proceedings and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO; in the alternative, should the other party before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervene, order the defendant and intervener jointly and severally to pay the applicant’s costs in the present proceedings and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# CE2004088EN.01045001.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/450 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/450

---

(2004/C 88 E/0459)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3081/03

by David Bowe (PSE) to the Commission

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   Sewage systems in Palestine

Subject:

Only 37,5 % of Palestinian homes are connected to a sewage system. This creates a serious environmental hazard.

Is the Commission aware of the effect that this has on the health of Palestinians? What action is it taking to address this issue?

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended.  The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, Publications (G13s).                    

*Date:*                         February 25, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hua-Chuan Sim, MD, Health Science Administrator, National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 25, 2005.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-1834  Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00209-CR

Todd Anthony Lee, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 61820, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Todd Anthony Lee pleaded guilty to the offense of sexual assault. See

Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.011(a)(2) (West Supp. 2008). The district court sentenced Lee to

ten years’ imprisonment.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief

concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684

(Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous

v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief
2

and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se

brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: August 22, 2008

Do Not Publish
# CE2004065EN.01005902.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/59

---

(2004/C 65 E/061)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1038/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(28 March 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds from the Leader+ programme by the municipality of Macerata

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Macerata, urgently need to use European funds to support innovative rural development measures aimed at enhancing the cultural and natural heritage, creating new jobs by strengthening the local economy and improving the organisational capacity of rural communities,

can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Macerata has submitted projects for the Leader+ programme? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Macerata has submitted projects for the Leader+ programme?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Macerata has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Macerata has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---
# CE2004078EN.01027102.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/271 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/271

---

(2004/C 78 E/0272)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3360/03

by Jean-Maurice Dehousse (PSE) to the Commission

(14 November 2003)

Subject:   Free movement of persons

Subject:

In closing with its frontier with Gibraltar, Spain has established a barrier to the freedom of movement of persons within the territory of the European Community.

In order for this border closure to comply with the principle of freedom of movement, it needs to be based on one or more specific, legal provisions concerning derogation.

Can the Commission state what the condition(s) is/are in this case? Are they furthermore applicable in the Community, and under what conditions? Are there furthermore other provisions of the same kind, i.e. capable of producing the same effects?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(7 January 2004)

(7 January 2004)

The Honourable Member is invited to refer to the reply given by the Commission to oral question H-0668/03 by Glyn Ford during question time at Parliament's plenary session of November 2003 (1).

1

---

(1)  Written reply, 18.11.2003.

1

---
STATE v. Ronald Michael McCRARY.

No. 413A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 1, 2015.

John L. Wait, High Point, for McCrary, Ronald Michael.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 1st of July 2015 by State of NC:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of July 2015."

State of NC shall have up to and including the 12th day of August 2015 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 480 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 480

To amend the Antitrust Modernization Commission Act of 2002, to extend 
   the term of the Antitrust Modernization Commission and to make a 
                         technical correction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2007

   Mr. Kohl (for himself, Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Specter) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Antitrust Modernization Commission Act of 2002, to extend 
   the term of the Antitrust Modernization Commission and to make a 
                         technical correction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Antitrust Modernization Commission 
Extension Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TERMINATION.

    Section 11059 of the Antitrust Modernization Commission Act of 2002 
(15 U.S.C. 1 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``30 days'' and inserting ``60 days''; and
            (2) by striking ``section 8'' and inserting ``section 
        11058''.
                                 <all>
```