alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 683 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 683

 To amend section 9 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to ensure 
     that operating and capital assistance is provided for certain 
           previously assisted public housing dwelling units.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 26, 2007

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 9 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to ensure 
     that operating and capital assistance is provided for certain 
           previously assisted public housing dwelling units.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Housing Equal Treatment Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PREVIOUSLY ASSISTED PUBLIC HOUSING.

    (a) In General.--Section 9 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 
(42 U.S.C. 1437g) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(o) Ensuring Correct Assistance.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, in determining the allocations for each public 
housing agency from the Operating and Capital Funds pursuant to this 
section, the Secretary shall include as dwelling units eligible for 
such assistance all public housing dwelling units that--
            ``(1) are owned by the public housing agency at the time of 
        such determination; and
            ``(2) before the date of the enactment of the Public 
        Housing Equal Treatment Act of 2007 have received development, 
        operating, capital, or modernization assistance pursuant to the 
        terms of any agreement with Department of Housing and Urban 
        Development authorizing the agency to expend such funds on 
        behalf of such units.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to assistance under section 9 of the United States 
Housing Act of 1937 for fiscal year 2008 and each fiscal year 
thereafter.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009006EN.01002101.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/21

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 November 2008 — Nalocebar v OHIM — Limiñana y Botella (Limoncello di Capri)

(Case T-210/05) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark Limoncello di Capri - Earlier national word mark LIMONCHELO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2009/C 6/41)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Nalocebar — Consultores e Serviços Lda (São Pedro, Portugal) (represented by: G. Pasquarella and R. Pasquarella, lawyers)

Applicant:

a

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially M. Capostagno and then O. Montalto, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Limiñana y Botella, SL (Monforte del Cid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 March 2005 (Case R 646/2004-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Limiñana y Botella, SL and Nalocebar — Consultores e Serviços Lda.

a

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nalocebar — Consultores e Serviços Lda to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nalocebar — Consultores e Serviços Lda to pay the costs.

a

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 23.7.2005.

1

---
Lawrence J. HERTZBERG, Plaintiff, v. FUR SPECIALISTS, INC., Greg Albert, and Hertzberg Furs of Raleigh, Inc., Defendants.

No. COA15-280.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Jan. 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
In the Matter OF: K.L., R.E.

No. COA15-349.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Aug. 18, 2015.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed in part; Remanded in part.
In the Matter of MAYE, Claim for Compensation Under the North Carolina Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program, Claimant-Appellant.

In the Matter of Davis, Claim for Compensation Under the North Carolina Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program, Claimant-Appellant.

In the Matter of Staggers, Claim for Compensation Under the North Carolina Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program, Claimant-Appellant.

Nos. COA15-874 COA15-882 COA15-883.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 15, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
STATE v. Bernard George LAMP, Jr.

No. 222A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Feb. 16, 2016.

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Lamp, Bernard George (Jr.).

Kathleen M. Joyce, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Lamp, Bernard George (Jr.).

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Sarah M. Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

G. Glenn Gerding, for Lamp, Bernard George (Jr.).

Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Lamp, Bernard George (Jr.).

Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 16th of February 2016 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of February 2016."
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6517

ANDRE RAYMOND VINES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BRYAN WATSON, Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:07-cv-01274-CMH-TRJ)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Raymond Vines, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Andre Raymond Vines seeks to appeal the district court’s

dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The

district court’s order indicated that the habeas petition was

dismissed without prejudice due to Vines’ failure to show cause why

his claims were not procedurally defaulted or time-barred. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). This order is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as Vines can cure the

relevant defect by filing an amended petition addressing these

matters. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,

10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE v. Timothy RICHARDSON.

No. 232A95-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 7, 2015.

Howard A. Kurtz, Raleigh.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Counsel to Attorney General, for State of NC.

Kenneth J. Rose, Durham, Thomas J. Moore, II, Rocky Mount, for Richardson, Timothy.

Robert A. Evans, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of August 2015 by Defendant for Enlargement of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of August 2015."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 26, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 137108 & (3) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Justices 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 137108 

 ADB: 05-000026-GA 

JAMAL JOHN HAMOOD,

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0822 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 26, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit
      10.28





**ADDITIONAL
      AMENDMENT TO**


**BPC
      HOLDING CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED**


**2002
      STOCK OPTION PLAN DATED MARCH 3, 2004**





The
      undersigned, Jeffrey D. Thompson, Assistant Secretary of BPC Holding
      Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “ Company ”),
      hereby certifies that he is the duly appointed Assistant Secretary of the
      Company and does further certify on behalf of the Company in such capacity
      that
      the following Additional Amendment to BPC Holding Corporation Amended and
      Restated 2002 Stock Option Plan dated March 3, 2004 (" Amendment ")
      was
      duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company by written consent of
      the
      Board of Directors in lieu of a meeting dated December 14, 2005, and by the
      stockholders of the Company by Written Consent of Majority Shareholders in
      Lieu
      of a Meeting dated December 14, 2005:





**WHEREAS** ,
      by
      written consent in lieu of a meeting dated December 14, 2005, the Board of
      Directors of the Company voted to increase the number of Shares subject to
      Fixed
      Price Options authorized under the BPC Holding Corporation 2002 Stock Option
      Plan, as amended (the “ Plan ”);
      and





**WHEREAS** ,
      a
      majority of the stockholders of the Company approved such amendments by Written
      Consent of Majority Shareholders in Lieu of a Meeting of Stockholders dated
      December 14, 2005.





**NOW,
      THEREFORE** ,
      the
      Plan is hereby amended as follows:




1.  All
      terms
      used herein that are defined in the Plan and not otherwise defined or amended
      herein are used herein as defined in the Plan.




2.  The
      first
      sentence of Section 4.1 is hereby amended by deleting such sentence in its
      entirety and replacing such sentence with the following:




“Subject
      to Section 10 of the Plan, the maximum number of Shares that may be made the
      subject of Fixed Price Options granted under the Plan is 415,720.”




3.  It
      is
      hereby acknowledged and confirmed that the Plan is, and shall continue to be,
      in
      full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects
      except that on and after the date of this Amendment all references in any
      related document to the Plan, “thereto”, “thereof”, “thereunder” or words of
      like import referring to the Plan shall mean the Plan as amended from time
      to
      time, including this Amendment.







/s/
      Jeffrey D. Thompson


Assistant
      Secretary


BPC
      Holding Corporation
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel Adenosine Receptors Unsolicited P01.
    Date: October 3, 2005.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sujata Vijh, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-0985, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c4a5556544f7c52555d555812525554125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="77011e1d1f0437191e161e1359191e1f59101801">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 9, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18396 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Council Decision of 11 February 2014 appointing three Danish members and five Danish alternate members of the Committee of            the Regions (2014/79/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 11 February 2014

# appointing three Danish members and five Danish alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/79/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Danish Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)Three members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Knud                              ANDERSEN, Mr Jens Arne HEDEGAARD JENSEN and Mr Henning JENSEN.

(3)Three alternate members’ seats have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Hans Freddie Holmgaard MADSEN,                              Ms Tatiana SORENSEN and Mr Ole B. SORENSEN.

(4)Two alternate members’ seats will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Simon Mønsted STRANGE and Mr Erik FLYVHOLM                              as members of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which                     runs until 25 January 2015:                  

as members:
                -  Mr Erik FLYVHOLM, *Mayor of Lemvig Municipality,*                                   
                -  Mr Bent HANSEN, *Chairman of the Regional Council, Region Central Denmark,*                                   
                -  Mr Simon Mønsted STRANGE, *Member of the City Council of Copenhagen;*                                   

and

as alternate members:
                -  Mr Anker BOYE, *Mayor of Odense Municipality,*                                   
                -  Ms Jane FINDAHL, *Councillor, Fredericia Municipality,*                                   
                -  Mr Carl HOLST, *President of the Regional Council of the Region of Southern Denmark,*                                   
                -  Mr Lars KRARUP, *Mayor of Herning,*                                   
                -  Mr Michael ZIEGLER, *Mayor of Høje-Taastrup Kommune.*                                   

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

E. Venizelos                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136777 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136777 

 COA: 276592 

Wayne CC: 05-012256-01

EPIFANIO CABRERA RIVAS, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name*: Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education (9487).                    

*Dates*: October 19, 2005, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. and October 20, 2005, 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.                    

*Place*: Stafford I, Room 1235, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting*: Open.                    

*Contact Person*: Dr. David Campbell, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation, Suite 885, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230. Phone (703) 292-5093.                    

*Minutes*: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

*Purpose of Meeting*: To provide advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning support for environmental research and education.                    

*Agenda*: October 19—Update on recent NSF environmental activities; Report on NSF-DOE Water workshop; Report on BE PI meeting; Discussion of AC-ERE topics of interest: AC-ERE task group meetings.                    

October 20—AC-ERE task group reports; Meeting with the Director; Presentation on “environmental curricula at universities.”

Dated: September 13, 2005.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-18463 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# C_2009006EN.01002201.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/22

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2008 — Rautaruukki v OHIM — (RAUTARUUKKI)

(Case T-269/06) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark RAUTARUUKKI - Absolute grounds for refusal of registration - Descriptive character - Absence of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Evidence offered in support)

(2009/C 6/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rautaruukki Oyj (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: P. Hagman, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 July 2006 (Case R 48/2006-4) concerning the registration of the word mark RAUTARUUKKI as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rautaruukki Oyj to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rautaruukki Oyj to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 18.11.2006.

1

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 31, 2014

NO. 03-13-00105-CV

Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas and John Burpo, Appellants

v.

Mike Sheffield, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE, AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND DISMISSED IN PART; REMANDED IN 

PART -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on January 31, 2013. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial 

court’s order. Therefore, the Court reverses the portion of the trial court’s order denying the 

motion to dismiss with respect to claims based on comments made among CLEAT members and 

will dismiss those claims pursuant to the TCPA. We affirm the order denying the motion to 

dismiss Sheffield’s claim based on comments made to the district attorney and other unnamed 

persons. We remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, including 

consideration by the trial court of an award of costs and fees relating to the motion to dismiss. 

The appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.