alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
4.1


 




	
  

  	
  SPECIMEN COMMON
  STOCK COMMON STOCK FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK,
  $0.0000056 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF SemiLEDs Corporation transferable on the
  books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized
  attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This
  Certificate shall not be valid until countersigned and registered by the
  Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile signatures of the
  Corporation's duly authorized officers. Dated: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHIEF
  FINANCIAL OFFICER COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER &
  TRUST COMPANY, LLC (NEW YORK, N.Y.) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY
  AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE
  REVERSE FOR STATEMENTS RELATING TO RIGHTS, PREFERENCES, PRIVILEGES AND
  RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY CUSIP 816645 10 5 THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE RECORD
  HOLDER OF SLD
STATE v. Robert T. WALSTON, Sr.

No. 392PA13-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 18, 2015.

Mark Montgomery, for Walston, Robert T. (Sr.).

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

R. Andrew Womble, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of December 2015 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> *464"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of December 2015."
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of enherent Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas A. Catalano, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas A. Catalano                                                           
|Douglas A. Catalano Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President March 31, 2005



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
RIBELIN v. CREEL.

No. 112A15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Robert L. Inge, Salisbury, for Creel, Phillip Ray.

Phillip Creel, for Creel, Phillip Ray.

Arlaine Rockey, Marshall, for Ribelin, Dana Marie (fka Creel).

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of March 2015 by Plaintiff-Appellant to Deem Notice of Appeal and Petition for Discretionary Review Timely Filed:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2238Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/2238 of 30 November 2015 appointing a Dutch alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2238                     

# of 30 November 2015

# appointing a Dutch alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Dutch Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116(1), (EU) 2015/190(2) and (EU) 2015/994(3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January                              2020. On 18 September 2015, by Council Decision (EU) 2015/1573(4), Ms Nienke HOMAN was appointed as alternate member until 25 January 2020.

(2)An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Nienke HOMAN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term                     of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:                  
          -  Mr H. (Henk) STAGHOUWER, Member of the Executive Council of the Province of Groningen. 

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

É. Schneider                            

1

OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.                           

2

OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.                           

3

OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.                           

4

OJ L 245, 22.9.2015, p. 10.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                    NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                750,535
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         778,109
<ALLOWANCES>                         (56,892)
<INVENTORY>                        11,115,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0
<PP&E>                              2,648,271
<DEPRECIATION>                      (561,803)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     17,342,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                            56,858,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                            3,484,560
<OTHER-SE>                       (44,505,893)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       17,342,565
<SALES>                            10,936,097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   11,151,695
<CGS>                               7,738,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       8,966,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     31,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     2,204,626
<INCOME-TAX>                          881,852
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        1,322,774
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Bo Anderson TAYLOR.

No. 1A15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Taylor, Bo Anderson.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 2nd of January 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
STATE v. Randy Benjamin BARTLETT.

No. 19PA14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

David W. Andrews, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Bartlett, Randy Benjamin.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

A. Leon Stanback, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of February 2015 by Defendant to Take Judicial Notice:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOMINGO MAXIMO IZAGUIRRE, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-71839 

Agency No. A070-183-442 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 8, 2020**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. 

Domingo Maximo Izaguirre, a citizen and native of Honduras, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to 

reopen proceedings conducted in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by 

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to 

reopen and review de novo questions of law. Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 581 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-71839 

(9th Cir. 2016). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Izaguirre’s unopposed 

motion to reopen, where it has the authority to do so. See Limsico v. INS, 951 F.2d 

210, 213 (9th Cir. 1991); cf. Konstantinova v. INS, 195 F.3d 528, 530-31 (9th Cir. 

1999) (abuse of discretion where denial of unopposed motion to remand was based 

on procedural error). Izaguirre has not raised, and therefore waives, any challenge 

to the BIA’s determination that Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), does 

not apply in this case. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th 

Cir. 2013) (petitioner waives a contention by failing to raise it in the opening 

brief). 

We lack jurisdiction to review Izaguirre’s unexhausted contention that, 

because his hearing notice was not accompanied by a certificate of service, 

jurisdiction did not vest with the immigration court. Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 

1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010).

Izaguirre’s contention that the BIA did not properly address the reason for 

his request for sua sponte reopening is not supported, and we otherwise lack 

jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of sua sponte reopening. See Bonilla, 840 

F.3d at 588. 
3 19-71839 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate. The motion for a stay of removal is otherwise denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2036Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/2036 of 26 October 2015 appointing four Italian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2036                     

# of 26 October 2015

# appointing four Italian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116(1), (EU) 2015/190(2) and (EU) 2015/994(3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January                              2020.

(2)Four alternate members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the term of office of                              Ms Bianca Maria D'ANGELO, Ms Paola GIORGI, Ms Carmen MURATORE and Mr Nicola VENDOLA,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed as alternate members to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term                     of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:                  
          -  Sig.ra Manuela BORA, *Consigliere regionale e Assessore della Regione Marche*,                         
          -  Sig.ra Ilaria CAVO, *Consigliere regionale e Assessore della Regione Liguria*,                         
          -  Sig. Vincenzo DE LUCA, *Presidente della Regione Campania*,                         
          -  Sig. Michele EMILIANO, *Presidente della Regione Puglia*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 26 October 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Dieschbourg                            

1

OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.                           

2

OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.                           

3

OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-506]


In the Matter of Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips and 
Chipsets and Products Containing Same, Including DVD Players and PC 
Optical Storage Devices; Notice of Commission Determination To Extend 
the Target Date for Completion of the Investigation

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to extend the target date for completion of 
the above-captioned investigation by approximately two weeks, or until 
September 27, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clara Kuehn, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3012. Copies of all 
nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone 202-205-2000.
    General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained 
by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public 
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS-ON-LINE) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-
impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be 
obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on April 14, 2004, based on a complaint filed by Zoran Corporation and 
Oak Technology, Inc. both of Sunnyvale, CA. 69 FR 19876 (2004).
    The previous target date for completion of this investigation was 
September 14, 2005. The Commission determined that the target date for 
completion of the investigation should be extended by approximately two 
weeks, or until September 27, 2005, due to the complexity of the issues 
under review.
    This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 
210.51(a) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
210.51(a)).

    Issued: September 13, 2005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-18497 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 12 September 2007 – Cain Cellars v OHIM (Device of a pentagon)**

**(Case T-304/05)**

Community trade mark – Application for a figurative Community trade mark consisting of the device of a pentagon – Absolute ground for refusal – Absence of distinctive character – Simplicity of the sign

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of any distinctive character (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 23-26)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2005 (Case R 975/2004-1) concerning the registration of the device of a pentagon as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Cain Cellars, Inc. |
| Community trade mark sought: | Pentagonal figurative mark for the goods ‘wine’ in Class 33 – Application No 3425121 |
| Decision of the Examiner: | Application for registration dismissed |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the appeal; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Cain Cellars, Inc. to pay the costs. |
a6531008ex10-28.htm


Exhibit 10.28


 


 












TRUSTEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT


 







November 30, 2010







Reference is made to that Base Indenture dated as of September 1, 2002 (the “Base Indenture”), between the Conn Funding II, L.P. (the “Issuer”) and the undersigned, as trustee (in such capacity, the “Trustee”), as supplemented by (i) the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 29, 2004 (the “First Supplemental Indenture”), (ii) the Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 2006 (the “Second Supplemental Indenture”), (iii) the Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 28, 2007 (the “Third Supplemental Indenture”), (iv) the Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 14, 2008 (the “Fourth Supplemental Indenture”), (v) the Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 2, 2010 (the “Fifth Supplemental Indenture”), (vi) the Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of the date hereof (the “Sixth Supplemental Indenture”), (vi) the Amended and Restated Series 2002-A Supplement dated as of September 10, 2007 (as amended, the “2002-A Supplement”), as amended by (a) Supplement No. 1 to Series 2002-A Supplement dated as of August 14, 2008 (“Supplement No. 1”), and (b) Supplement No. 2 to Series 2002-A Supplement dated as of March 16, 2010 (“Supplement No. 2”), pursuant to which the Issuer’s Series 2002-A Notes (the “Series 2002-A Notes”) were issued, and (vii) the Series 2006-A Series Supplement dated as of August 1, 2006 (the “2006-A Supplement” and, together with the Base Indenture, the First Supplemental Indenture, the Second Supplemental Indenture, the Third Supplemental Indenture, the Fourth Supplemental Indenture, the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, the Sixth Supplemental Indenture and the 2002-A Supplement, the “Indenture”), pursuant to which the Issuer’s Series 2006-A Notes were issued (the “Series 2006-A Notes”, and together with the Series 2002-A Notes, the “Notes”).







Pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Base Indenture, the Trustee hereby acknowledges that the Issuer’s obligations under the Indenture have been discharged except for those surviving obligations specified in Section 12.1 of the Base Indenture.

















[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]


 


 


 




  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as of the date first written above.







WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 


ASSOCIATION, as Trustee












By:  /s/ Kristen L. Puttin                                                    


Name:   Kristen L. Puttin


Title:  Vice President







 


 


 



 


 


 


Trustee Acknowledgment - Section 12.1 Base Indenture


Conn Funding II, L.P. - Signature Page
POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints  each of Adolph J. Ferro and Gilbert N.  Miller,  signing  singly,  the
undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

         1. Execute for and on behalf of the undersigned,  in the  undersigned's
capacity  as  a  director  of  Agritope,   Inc.,  a  Delaware  Corporation  (the
"Company"),  Forms 10-K, 10-Q or 8-K, and any amendments  thereto, in accordance
with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
the rules and regulations thereunder.

         2. Do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned
which may be  necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 10-K,
10-Q or 8-K,  and any  amendments  thereto,  and  timely  file  such  forms  and
amendments  with the United States  Securities  and Exchange  Commission and the
Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. or similar authority.

         3. Take any other action of any type  whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact,  may be of benefit to,
in the best  interest  of, or legally  required  by, the  undersigned,  it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned  pursuant to this Power of Attorney  shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such  attorney-in-fact  may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

         This Power of Attorney  shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned  is no  longer  required  to sign  Forms  10-K,  10-Q and  8-K,  and
amendments  thereto,  on behalf of the Company,  unless  earlier  revoked by the
undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney
to be executed as of this 23rd day of December, 1998.



                                             /S/ Nancy L. Buc
                                             -----------------------------------