alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Anthony BALL.

No. 102P13-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 18, 2016.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

*481Charles Anthony Ball, for Ball, Charles Anthony.

Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th of February 2016 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Henderson County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of April 2016."
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Zhen Feng Huang, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 95]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, entered September 16, 2004, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant voluntarily left her employment as a receptionist at a dentists’ office without good cause. Claimant testified that she resigned from her employment due to a difficult relationship with one of the dentists in the office who criticized her job performance, limited her responsibility to answer the telephone and twice ordered her to go home and take a break. Nevertheless, it is well settled that failure to get along with, or receiving criticism which is perceived as unduly harsh from, one’s employer generally does not constitute good cause for leaving employment *(see Matter of Lokensky [Commissioner of Labor],*19 AD3d 973, 974 [2005]; *Matter of Reiblein [Commissioner of Labor],*13 AD3d 712 [2004]; *Matter of Micara [Commissioner of Labor],*307 AD2d 568, 568-569 [2003]). Under the circumstances here, even if the dentist was ill-mannered toward claimant, the record supports the Board’s conclusion that the environment was not so intolerable as to justify claimant’s resignation. To the extent preserved for our review, claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
STATE of North Carolina v. Sharonda Nicole CANNON, Defendant.

No. COA15-292.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 15, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Prejudicial Error.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 178 (Thursday, September 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Accounting and Auditing Policy Committee Meeting on 
September 16, 2005

    Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules Of 
Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the 
Accounting and Auditing Policy Committee (AAPC), a permanent committee 
established by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) 
will meet on September 16, 2005 at 10 am in room 6N30 of the US 
Government Accountability Office (GAO) Building (441 G Street NW).
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues related to:

--Heritage Assets and Stewardship Land Implementation,
--Inter-Entity Cost Implementation, and
--Administrative Matters (Closed Session)

    A more detailed agenda can be obtained from the AAPC website 
(http://fasab.gov/aapc/aapc.html).
    Any interested person may attend the meeting as an observer. Board 
discussion and reviews are open to the public. GAO Building security 
requires advance notice of your attendance. Please notify FASAB of your 
planned attendance by calling 202-512-7350 at least one day prior to 
the respective meeting.
    For Further Information Contact: Wendy M. Comes, Executive 
Director, 441 G St., NW., Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548, or 
call (202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No 92-463.

    Dated: September 9, 2005.
Charles W. Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18305 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                    OCA, INC.
     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), of OCA, Inc. (the "Company"), I, David E. Verret,
Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

December 23, 2004                       /s/ David E. Verret
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        David E. Verret
                                        Senior Vice President of Finance and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00435-CR

Shawna Atchley

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-CR-1689-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 11, 2014
STATE v. AUGUSTINE, GOLPHIN, AND WALTERS.

No. 139PA13-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Jay H. Ferguson, Durham, for Augustine, Quintel, et al.

Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr.

James E. Ferguson, II, Charlotte, for Augustine, Quintel, et al.

Cassandra Stubbs, for Augustine, Quintel, et al.

William P. Hart, Sr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Jonathan Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Robert P. Mosteller, for Retired Members of the North Carolina Judiciary.

James Patrick Longest, Jr., for North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.

Irving Joyner, for North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.

Theresa A. Newman, for North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of January 2014 by Defendants to Strike:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

Beasley, and Ervin, J. recused.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3676 

To establish a prohibition on certain cell phone voice communications during 

passenger flights, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Mr. SHUSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To establish a prohibition on certain cell phone voice communications during passenger flights, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibiting In-Flight 

5 Voice Communications on Mobile Wireless Devices Act of 

6 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3676 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN CELL PHONE VOICE 

2 COMMUNICATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 417 of 

4 title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘§ 41725. Prohibition on certain cell phone voice com7 munications 

8 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary of Transpor9 tation shall issue regulations— 

10 ‘‘(1) to prohibit an individual on an aircraft 

11 from engaging in voice communications using a mo12 bile communications device during a flight of that 

13 aircraft in scheduled passenger interstate or intra14 state air transportation; and 

15 ‘‘(2) that exempt from the prohibition described 

16 in paragraph (1) any— 

17 ‘‘(A) member of the flight crew on duty on 

18 an aircraft; 

19 ‘‘(B) flight attendant on duty on an air20 craft; and 

21 ‘‘(C) Federal law enforcement officer act22 ing in an official capacity. 

23 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following 

24 definitions apply: 

25 ‘‘(1) FLIGHT.—The term ‘flight’ means, with 

26 respect to an aircraft, the period beginning when the 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3676 IH

1 aircraft takes off and ending when the aircraft 

2 lands. 

3 ‘‘(2) MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE.— 

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘mobile 

5 communications device’ means any portable 

6 wireless telecommunications equipment utilized 

7 for the transmission or reception of voice data. 

8 ‘‘(B) LIMITATION.—The term ‘mobile com9 munications device’ does not include a phone in10 stalled on an aircraft.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for chap12 ter 417 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 

13 inserting after the item relating to section 41724 the fol14 lowing: 

‘‘41725. Prohibition on certain cell phone voice communications.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CASSIDY TURLEY COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC., d/b/a DTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SOMERSET PROPERTIES SPE, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. COA15-991.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 16, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Dismissed.
STATE v. Rahul Rumar MACK.

No. 258P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Douglas W. Corkhill, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Rahul Rumar Mack, Lumberton, for Mack, Rahul Rumar.

Rick Shaffer, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of July 2015 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

> "Motion Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."

Ervin, J. recused.
STATE of North Carolina v. Johnathon Paul CHASE.

No. COA15-608.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Jan. 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Reversed and Remanded.
PRICE v. CHESTNUT RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASS'N CO., INC.

No. COA06-789.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 6, 2007.

Certification March 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Jackson (04CVD413).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
----

(2004/C 78 E/0145)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2638/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(2 September 2003)

Subject:   Refunds on exports from Member States to the Vatican City State of butter and other fats and oils derived from milk, milk products (code 0405) for 2001

In response to questions E-1477/03 and E-1480/03 (1) relating to refunds on exports of agricultural products from Member States to the Vatican City State (VCS), Commissioner Fischler stated on 21 May 2003 that the Commission was collecting the information it needed to answer the question and would communicate its findings as soon as possible.

The following supplementary data can be supplied in relation to the export of butter and other fats and oils derived from milk, milk products (code 0405):

Could the Commission state the technical reasons for the foregoing of this Community aid?

Does it not agree that the increasingly patent omissions and the discrepancies between the data from the different institutional sources seriously affect the credibility of these institutions and might be due to possible fraud against Community funds, or is it already able to discount this possibility of fraud?

----

(1)OJ C 70 E 20.3.2004, p. 45.

----
ltwvexhibit1012.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing


 






1






 






2






 






3






 






4






 






5






 






6






 






7






 






8






 






9






 






10






 



 SCHEDULE A 

 PROPERTY

 NICKEL, COPPER & PGM PROPERTIES




11






 






12






 






13






 






14






 






15






 






16






 






17
The STATE v. Dylann S. ROOF.

2015-06-18-01

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

June 18, 2015.

**617ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the Honorable J.C. Nicholson, Jr., be vested with exclusive jurisdiction over any criminal charges that may be filed against Dylann S. Roof arising out or related to the killings which occurred on June 17, 2015, in the City of Charleston, Charleston County, South Carolina. Judge Nicholson shall decide all matters, both pretrial and trial, pertaining to these charges, including motions to appoint or **618relieve counsel, and shall retain jurisdiction over these charges regardless of where he may be assigned to hold court and may schedule such hearings as may be necessary at any time *584without regard as to whether there is a term of court scheduled.

/s/Jean H. Toal , C.J.

/s/FOR THE COURT
Exhibit 10.1





EXHIBIT 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT




THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of the 30th day of November, 2010 to that
certain CONSULTING AGREEMENT, dated as of September 9, 2008 (the “Consulting Agreement”), by JOS.
A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (“Client”) and ROBERT N. WILDRICK (“Consultant”).



FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby
acknowledged, Client and Consultant, being the sole parties to the Consulting Agreement, hereby
amend the Consulting Agreement and agree that, subject to earlier termination as otherwise set
forth in the Consulting Agreement, the last day of the Consulting Period shall be January 26, 2014.



Except as specifically amended hereby, the Consulting Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment
and the terms of the remainder of the Consulting Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall
control and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respective
meanings attributed to them in the Consulting Agreement. This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed a
part of the Consulting Agreement for all purposes.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above
written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	CLIENT:	 	 	 	CONSULTANT:	 	 
	 
	 
	JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC.	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ SIDNEY H. RITMAN
	 	 	 	/s/ ROBERT N. WILDRICK	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Sidney H. Ritman, Chairman
	 	 	 	Robert N. Wildrick	 	 
	 

	 	Compensation Committee
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Westaff, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
July 12, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dwight S. Pedersen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that:



Date:
August 26, 2003

| |  | By: | /s/DWIGHT S. PEDERSENDwight S. Pedersen President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the periodic report of Westaff, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 12, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dirk A. Sodestrom, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that:



Date:
August 26, 2003

| |  | By: | /s/DIRK A. SODESTROMDirk A. Sodestrom Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Westaff, Inc. and will be retained by Westaff, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
STATE v. Dennis O'Keith BLACKWELL.

No. 525P13-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Dennis O'Keith Blackwell, Norlina, for Blackwell, Dennis O'Keith.

Wallace W. Bradsher, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of October 2015 by Defendant for Collateral Review Consideration Petition Second Review of Judgment Supplementary Petition Not Challenging Conviction Only the Sentencing Phase:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30647

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CALVIN CHRISTOPHER WALLACE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:06-CR-20008

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Calvin Christopher Wallace has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Wallace has filed a response. Our independent

review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Wallace’s response discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-30647

2

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
# CE2004078EN.01043002.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/430 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/430

---

(2004/C 78 E/0451)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2793/03

by Eija-Riitta Korhola (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(19 September 2003)

Subject:   Definition of hot air and ban under the Kyoto Protocol

Subject:

At present the obstacles to allocation to companies posed by the EU emissions trading directive and the rules on competition laid down in the EC Treaty (Articles 87 and 88) probably go beyond what is necessary. That is why it is considered unlikely that ‘hot air’ (in other words emission allowances whose sale is not due to actual reductions in emissions) will come onto the market. The Kyoto Protocol itself does not prohibit the sale of or define hot air.

Does the EU have any means of preventing Member State governments from selling hot air directly (without first allocating it to companies)?

If not, does the Commission consider it necessary, not least in order to guarantee consistent international practice, to devise a definition of hot air and propose that the Kyoto Protocol be amended in such a way as to incorporate that definition and a ban on the sale of hot air?

---
simulations_10k-ex1047.htm


 







Exhibit 10.47


 



NOTICE OF ELECTION TO EXTEND TERM OF LEASE 


 


AIR Commercial Real Estate Association


 


Dated:  July 29, 2010


 


By and Between (Lessor) 


Crest Development LLC formerly Freeway Ventures LLC


 


And (Lessee) 


Simulations Plus, Inc.


 


Address of Premises: 42505 10th Street West, Lancaster, CA 93534







To the Lesser:


 


Notice is hereby given that Lessee irrevocably elects to exercise its option to extend the term of this Lease by 3 years, ie. from February 3, 2011 to February 2, 2014.


 


Please acknowledge receipt of this Notice in the space provided below and return a copy to Lessee via Email, or telefax.


 







 


Lessee:


 


Simulations Plus, Inc.







 


BY:  /s/ Momoko Beran                                        


Name Printed: Momoko Beran


Title: CFO







Lessor hereby acknowledges that it received this Notice on Lessor:







Crest Development LLC


 


 


BY: /s/ Gary Shaffer                                        


Name Printed:Gary Shaffer


Title:  Owner
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 68 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 68

  For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Akaka introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Vichai Sae 
Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree) shall be held and considered to 
have been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent 
residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment of 
the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Vichai Sae Tung (also 
known as Chai Chaowasaree), as provided in this Act, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by the appropriate 
number during the current fiscal year the total number of immigrant 
visas available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under 
section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
David W. THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE; Bank of America, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Countrywide Home Loans; Hutchens Law Firm FNA Hutchens Senter Kellam & Pettit, P.A.; Substitute Trustee Services, Inc.; HSBC Bank USA, N.A. as Trustee for the Securitized Trust Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust Series 2006-A1; Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. ; Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc. ; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Mortgage Electronic Registration System, aka "MERS" and Does 1 through 100, Inclusive, Defendants.

No. COA15-981.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.