alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.8
                                Letter Agreement




September 28, 2000


3220 Executive Ridge Drive
Suite 100
Vista, California 92083

         Re: Teletrac, Inc.

Dear Mr. Alan B. Howe:

Reference is made to that certain employment agreement dated as of September 29,
1999 (the "Employment Agreement") between you and Teletrac, Inc. (the "Company")
regarding the term of your employment with the Company. This will confirm our
understanding that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.       Section 2 is hereby deleted and the following is inserted in its place:

         "2. Term of Employment. Unless earlier terminated as hereinafter
         provided, the term of the Employee's employment under this Agreement
         shall initially be for a period beginning on the Effective Date hereof
         and ending thirty-six months after the Effective Date. Thereafter, this
         Agreement will continue in full force and effect from year to year
         unless terminated by either the Employee or the Company by written
         notice given to the other not later than two months before the end of
         the year of such termination. The period from the date hereof until the
         date the Employee's employment hereunder is terminated (whether
         thirty-six months after the Effective Date or earlier or later as
         provided herein) is hereinafter called the "Employment Term."

2.       Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, nothing herein shall
         affect or be deemed to affect any provisions of the Employment
         Agreement, and except only to the extent that they may be varied
         hereby, all of the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain
         unchanged and in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and
         confirmed.


<PAGE>


If the foregoing correctly sets forth our understanding concerning this matter,
please sign below and return to us an executed copy of this letter, whereupon
this letter shall become a binding agreement between us.

Sincerely,

Teletrac, Inc.


By /s/ Steven D. Scheiwe
   ---------------------------------

Name:  Steven D. Scheiwe

Title: Chief Executive Officer





Accepted and agreed to as of the date written above.


/s/ Alan B. Howe
-------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED)
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          33,907
<SECURITIES>                                    52,783
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,949
<PP&E>                                           6,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,922
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,125
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,916
<SALES>                                         75,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,527
<CGS>                                           25,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,480
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,423
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,057
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
# CE2004078EN.01076602.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/766 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/766

---

(2004/C 78 E/0816)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2926/03

by Michl Ebner (PPE-DE) to the Council

(6 October 2003)

Subject:   Urgent need to expand voluntary fire services

Subject:

Mediterranean countries have again been hit this summer by devastating forest and bush fires. Large numbers of people have fallen victim to fires in Portugal and the south of France, which have been unusually frequent and have affected an unusually wide area. Enormous damage has also been caused both to the natural environment and the economy. It was only by deploying large numbers of personnel, and thanks to the help of numerous volunteers, that the fires were able to be brought under control. Discussions on the possibility of promoting the use of voluntary fire services date back to 1996.

To what extent is expansion of voluntary fire services, such as already exist in the South Tyrol, Austria and Germany, planned? Is such expansion also supported in Mediterranean countries?

Reply

(4 March 2004)

(4 March 2004)

The Council would refer the Honourable Member in particular to its reply to question E-2624/03, put to the Council by Michel-Ange Scarbonchi, concerning civil protection against forest fires.

---
Josephine BURRELL v. SPARKKLES RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Bridgewater Group, Inc., and Piedmont Mutual Insurance Company.

No. 159P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Daniel K. Bryson, Scott C. Harris, Raleigh, for Burrell.

Steven B. Epstein, Edward Avery Wyatt, Raleigh, for Reconstruction Co., et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 657 S.E.2d 712.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of April 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of Xechem  International,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the year ended  December  31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dr. Ramesh
C. Pandey, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  and Dr. Ramesh C. Pandey,
as Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ Dr. Ramesh C. Pandey
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Name:    Dr. Ramesh C. Pandey
                                                 --------------------------
                                        Title:   Chief Executive Officer
                                                 --------------------------
                                        Date:    April 14, 2003
                                                 --------------------------

                                        /s/ Dr. Ramesh C. Pandey
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Name:    Dr. Ramesh C. Pandey
                                                 --------------------------
                                        Title:   Chief Financial Officer
                                                 --------------------------
                                        Date:    April 14, 2003
                                                 --------------------------
Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




We  hereby  consent  to the use in the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB of Baron
Capital Trust of our report dated  February 25, 2000,  except for Note 12, as to
which the date is April 7, 2000 (which report contains an explanatory  paragraph
relating to substantial  doubt about the Trust's  ability to continue as a going
concern)  relating to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of Baron Capital
Trust as of  December  31, 1999 and for each of the two years in the period then
ended, appearing in such Annual Report.



                                                 RACHLIN COHEN & HOLTZ LLP

Miami, Florida
April 25, 2000
----

(2004/C 65 E/269)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2987/03

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(9 October 2003)

Subject:   Inadequate monitoring of maximum residue levels (MRL) of toxic substances and combinations of toxic substances in nectarines and grapes originating in the EU

Source: the 24 September 2003 edition of ‘De Volkskrant’, a Dutch newspaper

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(19 November 2003)

The Commission is not aware of the research mentioned by the Honourable Member.

In the risk assessment performed when setting Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs), and when evaluating findings in the framework of the Rapid Alert System for Foodstuffs, the Commission makes a distinction between fruit that is consumed with the peel and fruit consumed without the peel.

In the Community coordinated report on Pesticide Residues, available on the Commission website, the percentage of violations of MRLs varies between 2 and 5 percent. There is no significant trend pointing to an increase of incorrect uses of plant protection products either in or outside the Community.

The results of the latest Community coordinated report for the year 2001 shows an average of 3,9 % of violations, ranging in the Member States between 1,3 and 9,1 percent.

It should be noted that MRLs are not toxicological limits and a violation of a MRL is not necessarily a food safety issue. MRLs are set, based on (i) evidence that the correct use of a plant protection product leads to a residue on the harvested produce and (ii) that the presence of this residue does not lead to a risk to the consumer. In most cases the MRL represents a level that is significantly below the level of concern. When, in the framework of the Rapid Alert System for Foodstuffs an MRL violation is notified, a risk assessment is carried out. If an immediate risk to the consumer is established, an Alert notification is issued. The Commission, through the Food and Veterinary Office, systematically addresses the issue of notifications when making inspections in the Member States.

In addition, the Commission proposal for a Regulation of the Parliament and of the Council on the setting of maximum residues limits in food (1) includes proposals to increase monitoring and control measures in the Member States.

----

(1)  COM(2003) 117 final.

----
Gaillard BELLOWS and her husband, Jon Bellows v. ASHEVILLE CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION dba Asheville High School and SKA Consulting Engineers, Inc., Formerly Sutton-Kennerly & Associates, Inc., and Zebulon W. Wells, Jr., individually.

No. 364P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Christopher Z. Campbell, Charlotte, John F. Flenning, Jr., for Asheville City Board of Education.

Bruce P. Ashley, Patrick M. Kane, Greensboro, for SKA Consulting Engineers, Inc., et al.

Lisa W. Arthur, Greensboro, Elizabeth E. McConnell, Asheville, Katherine M. Pomroy, Attorney at Law.

Isaac N. Northup, Jr., Asheville, Katherine Marie Bulfer, Attorney at Law, for Bellows, Gaillard, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd of November 2015 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals *483pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
NO. 07-08-0323-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

AUGUST 19, 2008

______________________________

WAYNE MARC JACKSON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 242 DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; nd

NO. B16050-0505; HON. EDWARD L. SELF, PRESIDING

__________________________________

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

__________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant Wayne Marc Jackson, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. Without passing on the

merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Brian Quinn

 Chief Justice

Do not publish.
**Exhibit 99.22****CONSENT OF J. VOORHEES**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated byreference therein (the “40-F”) of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December31, 2009, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and theAnnual Information Form (the “AIF”) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of theCompany for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference inthe 40-F.     I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the followingreport(s) and to the references, as applicable, to my name in connection with (including, as anexpert) the following report(s) and documents: 1. The technical report dated November 11, 2003, entitled “Marlin ProjectTechnical Report” (the “Marlin Report”); and  2. The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connectionwith information relating to the Marlin Report and the Marlin Mine,and the properties described therein.Date:March 19, 2010            /s/ James S. Voorhees     Name: James S. Voorhees, P.Eng.
Beulah R. HEINITSH v. WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION f/k/a First Union National Bank, N.A., Agnes H. Willcox, John S. Heinitsh, Isabel H. Nichols, and Reginald D. Heinitsh, Jr.

No. 465P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Larry B. Sitton, Charlotte, Manning A. Connors, Greensboro, for Beulah Heinitsh.

Kevin G. Williams, Winston-Salem, William K. Davis, for Wachovia Bank.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 665 S.E.2d 541.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of October 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

         CERTIFICATION OF DONALD J. RECHLER, CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       OF RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.,
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



I, Donald J. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Reckson Associates Realty
Corp. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  August 8, 2003


                           By      /s/ Donald J. Rechler
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                                   Donald J. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reckson Associates Realty Corp. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18414]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Mayer, 
Brown, Rowe & Maw on behalf of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe 
Railway Company (BNSF) (WB461-12--9/9/2005) for permission to use 
certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this 
request may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental 
Analysis, and Administration.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, 
Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of 
the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are 
codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541.

Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-18414 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RODNEY SHANNON,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (OGDEN NEWSPAPERS OF PENNSYLVANIA),

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 292 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 11.1

                         APPLIED VOICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                               (Unaudited)


                              Quarter ended     Six months
                                 June 30,      ended June 30,
                              --------------  ---------------
                                   1997            1997
                              --------------  ---------------
                            (in thousands, except per share data)
                             

Net income                      $   1,772       $    577
                              ==============  ===============
Computation of common and
  common equivalent shares          
  outstanding:                              
               Common Stock         5,621          5,597       
               Options                471            483
                              --------------  ---------------
Common and common equivalent
  shares used in computing per
  share amounts                     6,092          6,080
                              ==============  ===============
Net income per share            $    0.29       $   0.09
                              ==============  ===============




The fully diluted computation is not presented as it is not materially different
from primary earnings per share, calculated above.
STATE v. Barney Adrian DUNLAP.

No. 79P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

C. Norman Young, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Barney Adrian Dunlap, Marion, for Dunlap, Barney Adrian.

James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of February 2015 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey B. deCillia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)).





(2)  To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/S/    JEFFREY B. DECILLIA








Jeffrey B. deCillia


Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer


August 19, 2002
# CE2004088EN.01057901.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/579 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/579

---

(2004/C 88 E/0591)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2951/02

by Rosa Miguélez Ramos (PSE) to the Commission

(14 October 2002)

Subject:   Allocation of structural funds

Subject:

Would the Commission please give details of the allocation by each local authority in Galicia (Spain) of the monies invested by the structural funds over the 1994-1999 programming period?

Supplementary answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(29 April 2004)

(29 April 2004)

The Commission is informed by the responsible authorities in Spain that the information requested for the region of Galicia is available at the detailed geographical level of the municipalities in incomplete form only. They have given us the following breakdown by province for the 1994-1999 programming period:

| (pesetas) |
| --- |
| PROVINCE | ERDF | EAGGF | FIFG |
| Lugo | 159 842 770 248 | 1 700 299 862 | 6 836 285 588 |
| La Coruña | 198 227392318 | 885 147 058 | 23 936 009 296 |
| Orense | 41 344 303 188 | 1 416 242 020 | — |
| Pontevedra | 106 497 819 506 | 526 301 303 | 45 759031802 |
| Total | 505 912 285 260 | 4 527 990 243 | 76 531326 686 |

(pesetas)

PROVINCE

ERDF

EAGGF

FIFG

Lugo

159 842 770 248

1 700 299 862

6 836 285 588

La Coruña

198 227392318

885 147 058

23 936 009 296

Orense

41 344 303 188

1 416 242 020

—

Pontevedra

106 497 819 506

526 301 303

45 759031802

Total

505 912 285 260

4 527 990 243

76 531326 686

They state that owing to the nature of the action financed by the ESF, the large number of Operational Programmes (multiregional and one regional) involved and the large number of managing bodies acting in Galicia, the breakdown asked for is very difficult to make. For Galicia as a whole the ESF contribution for 1994-1999 is EUR 576,13 million. This covers both the regional programme and the national level ones.

---