alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 686 

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the WashingtonRochambeau Revolutionary Route National Historic Trail. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2007 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Mr. WARNER, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. REED, Mr. 

BIDEN, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. DODD, and Mr. SPECTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the 

Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route National 

Historic Trail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington-Rocham5 beau Revolutionary Route National Historic Trail Des6 ignation Act’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 686 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION TO NATIONAL SCENIC AND NATIONAL 

2 HISTORIC TRAILS. 

3 Section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(26) WASHINGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLU7 TIONARY ROUTE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Washington-Ro9 chambeau Revolutionary Route National His10 toric Trail, a corridor of approximately 600 

11 miles following the route taken by the armies of 

12 General George Washington and Count Ro13 chambeau between Newport, Rhode Island, and 

14 Yorktown, Virginia, in 1781 and 1782, as gen15 erally depicted on the map entitled ‘WASH16 INGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLU17 TIONARY ROUTE NATIONAL HISTORIC 

18 TRAIL’, numbered T01/80,000, and dated July 

19 2006. 

20 ‘‘(B) MAP.—The map referred to in sub21 paragraph (A) shall be on file and available for 

22 public inspection in the appropriate offices of 

23 the National Park Service. 

24 ‘‘(C) ADMINISTRATION.—The trail shall be 

25 administered by the Secretary of the Interior, 

26 in consultation with— 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•S 686 IS

1 ‘‘(i) other Federal, State, tribal, re2 gional, and local agencies; and 

3 ‘‘(ii) the private sector. 

4 ‘‘(D) LAND ACQUISITION.—The United 

5 States shall not acquire for the trail any land 

6 or interest in land outside the exterior boundary 

7 of any federally-managed area without the con8 sent of the owner of the land or interest in 

9 land.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED
FROM  THE
STATEMENTS  FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1996 AND AS OF
JULY 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000930817
<NAME> PL BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Apr-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 May-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jul-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,086
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  631,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    184,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               826,070
<PP&E>                                         796,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                 557,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,065,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          966,140
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,120
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,074,089)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,065,395
<SALES>                                        828,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               828,389
<CGS>                                          705,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  210,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               20,070
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (107,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (107,255)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (107,255)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)
        


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Albert Lee STEVENSON, Jr.

No. 50P00-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 11, 2015.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Albert Lee Stevenson, Jr., for Stevenson, Albert Lee Jr.

Brandy Cook, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th of December 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of December 2015."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1156/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1156/2014 of 29 October 2014 correcting the Slovenian version of Commission Regulation            (EC) No 1135/2009 imposing special conditions governing the import of certain products originating in or consigned from China,            and repealing Commission Decision 2008/798/EC (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1156/2014                     

# of 29 October 2014

# correcting the Slovenian version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1135/2009 imposing special conditions governing the import                        of certain products originating in or consigned from China, and repealing Commission Decision 2008/798/EC                     

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down                           the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures                           in matters of food safety(1), and in particular Article 53(1)(b) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)The Slovenian language version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1135/2009(2) contains one repetitive error, i.e. the term ‘feed and food business operators’ is erroneous. Therefore a correction of the                              Slovenian language version is necessary. The other language versions are not affected.

(2)Regulation (EC) No 1135/2009 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

(3)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain                              and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Concerns only the Slovenian language version.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1.                           

2

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1135/2009 of 25 November 2009 imposing special conditions governing the import of certain products                              originating in or consigned from China, and repealing Commission Decision 2008/798/EC (OJ L 311, 26.11.2009, p. 3).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0403

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP 

OF:

G.R.M., 

 A Minor Child:

DIANA R. MERIDETH and KENNETH M. 

MERIDETH,

 Petitioners, Appellees,

 and Cross Appellants.

________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP 

OF:

G.R.M., 

 A Minor Child:

CAROL M. MERIDETH,

 Petitioner and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Appellant Carol Merideth, by counsel, has filed a motion for a 58-day extension of 

time within which to file her opening brief. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s opening brief 

shall be filed on or before December 18, 2020. 

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 7 2020

10/07/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0403
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     4095584
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1311413
<ALLOWANCES>                               (301927)
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           6733744
<PP&E>                                    12369856
<DEPRECIATION>                            (5982071)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            19132773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1371531
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     10177
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                16145877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              19132773
<SALES>                                    7171772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           7171772
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              7378797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          131963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1910
<INCOME-TAX>                                210950
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (209040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (209040)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.02)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1602-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-1602-DR), dated August 28, 2005, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 6, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 28, 2005:

Collier, Franklin, Okaloosa, and Walton Counties for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05-18095 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
----

(2004/C 65 E/138)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2279/03

by Koenraad Dillen (NI) to the Council

(9 July 2003)

Subject:   Sentencing of two journalists in Laos

Today, 30 June 2003, the media were shocked to learn that the independent Belgian journalist Thierry Falise, his French photographer, Vincent Reynaud, and their American interpreter, all three of whom were arrested in Laos on 4 June 2003, have been sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment for ‘illegal possession of arms’ and ‘obstruction of a public official’ after a show trial in which no legal principle was guaranteed.

Thierry Falise was preparing a report on the Hmong minority, who are resisting the totalitarian communist regime in Laos.

Has the Council condemned this?

Has the Council taken any diplomatic steps vis-à-vis the authorities in Vientiane? With what results? What pressure can the Council bring to bear to have this sentence lifted as quickly as possible?

Would it not be desirable to bring pressure to bear on the regime in Vientiane via the authorities in Beijing, bearing in mind that Laos particularly looks to China for support?

Reply

(17 November 2003)

----
# C_2023252EN.01006801.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/68

---

Action brought on 23 May 2023 — Dana Astra v Council

(Case T-281/23)

(2023/C 252/81)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dana Astra IOOO (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Lester, Barrister-at-Law, and P. Sellar, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 of 24 February 2023 (2) (‘contested measures’) insofar as they apply to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 of 24 February 2023 (2) (‘contested measures’) insofar as they apply to the applicant;

| — | order the Council to pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the applicant’s costs.

Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, being that the contested measures are vitiated by a manifest error of assessment.

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 41).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 of 24 February 2023 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 20).

---
STATE. v. Patrick Shane WILLIAMS.

No. 170P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Patrick Shane Williams, for Williams, Patrick Shane.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of May 2015 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal:

> "Motion Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
STATE v. Randy Lee SELLARS.

No. 547A05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Hilda Burnetts-Baker, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of October 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 14th day of October 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of October 2008."
STATE EX REL. ROSS v. OVERCASH.

No. COA08-127.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 16, 2008.

Certification Date October 6, 2008.

Appeal from Cabarrus (07CVS456).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# CE2004078EN.01052901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/529 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/529

---

(2004/C 78 E/0550)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3361/03

by Koenraad Dillen (NI) to the Commission

(14 November 2003)

Subject:   Ijzeren Rijn railway line

Subject:

The Ijzeren Rijn line is an example of a European transport route which is useful for an open economy. It links not only the port of Antwerp but also the ports of Ghent, Zeebrugge and Ostend with the Ruhr and the German hinterland. The Ijzeren Rijn exists and has proved its usefulness in the past, but has ceased to be used for several decades because the cost of environmental improvements such as the building of tunnels in certain places would be far too high to permit the line to become profitable in the near future. The Netherlands Government has been using this argument as a pretext to prevent any action on the matter. However, because of the growing transport problems and the exponential growth in container traffic, Flanders feels the need to bring this line back into operation. Germany, and particularly the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia, have supported Flanders for years in calling for this economically necessary development. However, unfortunately the Netherlands has adopted a policy of obstruction with regard to it, which is inspired by its own plans to create a modern link between the port of Rotterdam and the Ruhr by means of the exorbitantly expensive and environmentally undesirable Betuwe line, which will not benefit any other European country economically. Europe now formally recognises the importance of international railway lines.

Is the Commission monitoring developments with regard to the Ijzeren Rijn line?

Will the Commission try to secure a breakthrough at European level with regard to this vital matter, such as to arrive at a solution satisfactory to all parties?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(16 December 2003)

(16 December 2003)

The Commission monitors the developments in relation to the Iron Rhine (Ijzeren Rijn) link between Antwerp and the German Ruhr area with great interest. The Commission has included this link under priority project No 24: Railway axis Lyon/Genova-Basel-Duisburg-Rotterdam/Antwerpen in its proposal for the revision of the Guidelines for the Trans-European Transport Networks (TEN-T) (1). The countries involved have committed themselves to implement this project, which completion is foreseen for 2010. It should be observed though that the Betuwelijn link was part of the first serie of TEN-T projects, adopted under the so-called Essen project list in 1996.

1

Belgium and the Netherlands have recently decided to submit their conflict on the Iron Rhine to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague. The case is now at the pleading stage, and a ruling is expected for mid-2004. Hopefully, the ruling of the Court will constitute the basis for a satisfactory solution.

---

(1)  COM(2003) 564 final.

1

---
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANTTO**

 

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the QuarterlyReport of Hauppauge Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and thatinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Dated: | February 14, 2006                   |   | /s/ Kenneth Plotkin |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
|   |                                |
|   | Kenneth Plotkin                     |
|   |                                |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer            |
|   |                                |
|   |                                |
|   | /s/ Gerald Tucciarone               |   |
|   |                                |
|   | Gerald  Tucciarone                  |
|   |                                |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer, Treasurer |
|   |                                |
|   | and Secretary                       |
|        |                                     |        |                     |        |  |

 

----