alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 10137 and # 10138] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 4. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1595-DR), dated 07/10/2005. 

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Dennis.                     

*Incident Period:*                         07/07/2005 and continuing through 07/20/2005.                     

*Effective Date:*                         08/31/2005.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/08/2005.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         04/10/2006.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Florida, dated 07/10/2005, is hereby amended to re-establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 07/07/2005 and continuing through 07/20/2005. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) 

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-18437 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2008223EN.01006302.xml

| 30.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/63

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 February 2008 — Ghem v Commission

(Case F-62/05) (1)

1

(2008/C 223/121)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 229, 17.9.2008, p. 31 (initial judgment by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-270/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by Order of 15 December 2005).

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Tanisha Decole BELCHER.

No. 244A15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Mark Montgomery, for Belcher, Tanisha Decole.

David Stott Gordon, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Seth H. Edwards, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 21st of July 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

> "Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2008 – Guigard v Commission**

**(Case T-301/05)**

Non-contractual liability – Non-renewal of a contract of employment financed by the EDF – Lack of unlawful conduct on the part of the Commission – Jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance

1.                     *Procedure – Actions for damages (Arts 225 EC, 235 EC, 238 EC and 240 EC) (see paras 33-40)*

2.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Unlawfulness – Damage – Causal link – One of the conditions not present (Art. 288,
second para., EC) (see paras 43-44)*

3.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Sufficiently serious breach of Community law (Art. 288 EC) (see paras 55-56)*

4.                     *Non-contractual liability – Unlawful conduct of the institutions (Art. 288 EC) (see paras 55-80, 82-86)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION for damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant by reason of the allegedly wrongful conduct of the Commission in regard to the non-renewal of his contract of employment concluded in the framework of technical cooperation between the Community and the Republic of Niger financed by the European Development Fund (EDF). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the application; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Mr Philippe Guigard to pay the costs. |
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Gene
Logic Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:



| |  |  | The Annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                        

|                     |  |     |  |                          
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark D. Gessler      
|                     |  |     |  |                          
|                     |  |     |  | Mark D. Gessler          
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer  
|                     |  |     |  |                          
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Philip L. Rohrer, Jr.
|                     |  |     |  |                          
|                     |  |     |  | Philip L. Rohrer, Jr.    
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
1169.

#### Minter & Radney *v.*Bush.

Complaint — appeal, from Miller superior court — Judge Wor-TÍ11. February *25,*1908.

Submitted July 14,

Decided November 10, 1908.

*W. I. Geer,*for plaintiffs in error. *B. W.*Grow, contra.

Powell, J.

1. Strictness of pleading is not required, in setting out the cause of action in a ease instituted in a justice’s court. *G. S. & F. Ry. Co.*v. *Barfield,*1 *Ga. App.*203 (58 S. E. 236).

2. It is no objection to a verdict in a suit for injury to personalty that it. is less than the lowest amount of damage proved by the plaintiff, and higher than the highest amount shown by the defendant’s proof on that subject. *Town of Wrens*v. *Sammons,*129 *Ga.*755 (59 S. E. 776), and cit.; *Hawley Down Draft Furnace Co.*v. *Van Winkle Gin Works,*4 *Ga. App.*85 (60 S. E. 1008).

3. The trial was free from error. The evidence authorized the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000931755
<NAME> AEI INCOME & GROWTH FUND XXI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,956,104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,959,203
<PP&E>                                      17,305,589
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,312,563)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,952,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          538,431
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,413,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,952,229
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               451,438
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                234,782
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            234,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   234,782
<EPS-BASIC>                                       9.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.87



</TABLE>
*

 This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 27, 2008

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ROJAS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

RAY ROBERTS, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 08-3118

(No. 08-CV-03100-SAC)

(D. Kan.)

 

ORDER*

Before O’BRIEN, McKAY, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

Pro se Petitioner Jose Rojas, a state prisoner, seeks a certificate of

appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas

corpus petition. In 1987, Petitioner was convicted of one count of kidnaping and

two counts of second-degree murder. He was sentenced to consecutive terms of

life imprisonment on the kidnaping count and two terms of fifteen years to life on

the murder counts. 

Petitioner claims he was entitled to a parole hearing after fifteen years

rather than thirty as the Kansas Department of Corrections determined and state
-2-

courts affirmed. He exhausted his claim in the Kansas state courts before filing

his petition in the federal district court. The district court denied the petition,

holding that Petitioner had not stated a claim for federal relief, and also denied

Petitioner’s subsequent motion to reconsider, which the court construed as a

motion to alter or amend the judgment. The district court explained that not only

did Petitioner fail to state a federal claim for relief but that he also misconstrued

state law. The court noted that the state case on which Petitioner relied, Cooper

v. Werholtz, 83 P.3d 1212 (Kan. 2004), did not support Petitioner’s claim because

Cooper involved a prisoner who had been convicted and sentenced on only one

count, whereas Petitioner was convicted and received consecutive sentences on

multiple counts.

Petitioner must obtain a certificate of appealability to challenge the district

court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition. See Montez v. McKinna, 208 F.3d

862, 867 (10th Cir. 2000). To obtain a certificate of appealability, Petitioner

must make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). To meet this burden, Petitioner must demonstrate “that

reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the

petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that issues presented

were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

We have reviewed Petitioner’s filings, the district court’s rulings, and the
-3-

record on appeal. We find nothing that meets our standard for granting a

certificate of appealability. For substantially the reasons set forth in the district

court’s orders, we DENY Petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability and

DISMISS the appeal. We GRANT Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
STATE of North Carolina v. Cameron Wayne DUNCAN.

No. COA15-324.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Jan. 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF UBICS, INC. AS OF 12/31/99 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF UBICS, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/99
INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT OF UBICS, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/99
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                       885
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,339
<PP&E>                                           2,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (470)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,684
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,359
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 556
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    991
<INCOME-TAX>                                       382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                609
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       609
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54746-54747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18466]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than October 3, 2005.

[[Page 54747]]

    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Jay Bernstein, Bank 
Supervision Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Sydney, Australia; to acquire 
approval pursuant to Section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act and Section 
225.24(a) of Regulation Y, for its wholly-owned subsidiary, CommSec 
LLC, New York, New York, to engage in securities brokerage, private 
placement services, futures commission merchant, and other 
transactional services pursuant to Section 225.28(b)(7)(i)of Regulation 
Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 13, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc.05-18466 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 777 

To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments made to vendors 

by government entities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2007 

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments 

made to vendors by government entities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Withholding Tax Relief 

5 Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF IMPOSITION OF WITHHOLDING ON CER7 TAIN PAYMENTS MADE TO VENDORS BY GOV8 ERNMENT ENTITIES. 

9 The amendment made by section 511 of the Tax In10 crease Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is reVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:11 Mar 08, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S777.IS S777

ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 777 IS

1 pealed and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 

2 applied as if such amendment had never been enacted. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
**Exhibit 99.19**

**CONSENT OF ANDREW TRIPP, P.E.**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibits thereto, ofGoldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the “Annual Report”), I, Andrew Tripp, P.E., consent to (i) the use of and reference to the technical report dated 31 December, 2015, entitled“Cerro Negro Operations, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, NI 43-101 Technical Report” (the “Technical Report”), or portions thereof, that was prepared by me, that I supervised the preparation of and/or was reviewed and approved byme, (ii) the use of and references to my name, including as an expert or “qualified person”, in connection with the Annual Report and the Technical Report, and (iii) the information derived or summarized from the Technical Report that isincluded or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto. 

I also hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibits thereto into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126039,333-126040,333-151243,333-151251,333-174376,333-181116,333-188805,333-195816 and 333-213153 on Form S-8,No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company. 

Date: March 16, 2017
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 14, 2005 / Presidential Documents 54465 

Proclamation 7928 of September 9, 2005 

National Days of Prayer and Remembrance, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Americans will always remember the terrible events and violent cruelty 

of September 11, 2001. We will always honor the many innocent lives 

that were lost, and we will never forget the heroism of passengers, first 

responders, and others on that day. During this year’s National Days of 

Prayer and Remembrance, we pay tribute to the memory of those taken 

from us in the terrorist attacks in New York, in Pennsylvania, and at the 

Pentagon. We pray for the families left behind who continue to inspire 

us through their steadfast character, courage, and determination. 

In the time since September 11, 2001, Americans have come together to 

defend America and advance freedom. We are grateful to our brave men 

and women in uniform who are making daily sacrifices at home and at 

posts around the globe, and we pray for their safety as they defend our 

liberty. In the war on terror, we have lost good men and women who 

left our shores to protect our way of life and did not live to make the 

journey home. We honor their memories, and we pray for their families. 

The war that began for America on September 11, 2001, continues to call 

on the courage of our men and women in uniform and the perseverance 

of our citizens. The past 4 years have brought many challenges and sacrifices, 

yet we have much reason to be thankful and hopeful about the future. 

America has become more secure as terrorists have been brought to justice, 

two of the most brutal and aggressive regimes have ended, and freedom 

has spread in the Middle East and around the world. In the months and 

years ahead, we will continue to defend our freedom and lay the foundations 

of peace for our children and grandchildren. 

During these Days of Prayer and Remembrance, we give thanks to the Almighty for our freedom, and we acknowledge our dependence on the Giver 

of this gift. Four years after September 11, 2001, we remember the lives 

lost and pray for God’s continued blessings on their families and our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Friday, September 9, 

through Sunday, September 11, 2005, as National Days of Prayer and Remembrance. I ask that the people of the United States and places of worship 

mark these National Days of Prayer and Remembrance with memorial services 

and other appropriate ceremonies. 

54466 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 14, 2005 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of 

September, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–18369 

Filed 9–13–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P