alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit1043.htm


  


	


	
Exhibit 10.43

















August 31, 2010


 


Ronald W. Johnston







Dear Ron,


 


This letter serves as an amendment to your employment agreement with Tier Technologies, Inc. dated July 1, 2008 (the "Employment Agreement”). As of the date you execute this amendment, you hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:


 


1.    Delete the first sentence of Section 2, Term of Employment, and replace with the following:


 


       "The Company hereby continues to employ the Executive, and the Executive hereby accepts such continued employment, for the period commencing on the Effective Date and ending on August 16, 2013, subject to earlier termination of the Term of Employment in accordance with the terms of this Agreement."


 


2.    Revise the first sentence of Section 11(c) as follows: (i) replace "thirtieth (30th)" with "sixtieth (60th)" and (ii) insert at the end of the sentence “, which release must become effective and irrevocable no later than the sixtieth (60th) calendar day following the date of termination."


 


Except as modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect, including but not limited to your obligations under the Proprietary and Confidential Information, Developments, Noncompetition and Nonsolicitation Agreement that you signed for the benefit of the Company.












11130 Sunrise Valley Blvd. • Suite 300 • Reston, VA 20191 • Ph: 571-382-1000 • Fax: 571-382-1384







www.tier.com 









  





  











  








This amendment and the Employment Agreement contain the entire understanding and agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements, understandings, discussions, negotiations and undertakings, whether written or oral, with respect thereto.  This amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia (without reference to the conflict of laws provisions thereof).  This amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same document.







For and on behalf of


Tier Technologies, Inc.







/s/ Charles W. Berger


Charles W. Berger


Director

















I have read the above amendment to the Employment Agreement, and I voluntarily accept the terms and conditions set forth above.













	
/s/ Ronald W. Johnston

	  	
August 31, 2010


	
Ronald W. Johnston

	  	
Date

















-2-
STATE v. Aleksandr Sergeyevich KISELEV.

No. 187P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Paul M. Green, Durham, for Kiselev, Aleksandr Sergeyevich.

Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of June 2015 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
STATE of North Carolina v. Tae Kwon HAMMONDS.

No. 389A15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hammonds, Tae Kwo.

Joseph E. Elder, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Trey Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 23rd of November 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, Jeffrey L. Minch, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Littlefield
  Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
  untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
  to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
  quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
  information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

> a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
>     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
>     is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
>     period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
>     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
>     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
>     report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
>     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
>     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
>     Evaluation Date;

5.The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
  based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
  committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):

> a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
>     which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
>     summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
>     auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
>     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
>     who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
  in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
  controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
  subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
  actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  May 14, 2003/s/ Jeffrey L. Minch
  President and Chief Executive Officer
STATE of North Carolina, Plaintiff, v. Eric Nolan SELLERS, Defendant.

No. COA15-733.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 2, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Vacated and Remanded.
fs12010ex10xii_chinawood.htm


Exhibit 10.10


 


 


Lease Agreement







          Party A: Linyi Xintai Construction Co. Ltd.


          Party B: Linyi Chan Tseng Wood Co., Ltd.







          This LEASE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into on the 30th day of May 2009 by and between Linyi Xintai Construction Co. Ltd. (“Party A”) and Linyi Chan Tseng Wood Co., Ltd. (“Party B”).







WITNESSETH







          WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to enter into this Agreement to define and set forth the terms and conditions of the leasing cooperation between Party A and Party B;







          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements as set forth below, and in compliance with the “Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China,” it is hereby covenanted and agreed by both parties as follows:


 


    1.   Party B hereby agrees to lease from Party A the following properties (the “Leased Property”) located at Daizhuang Industrial Area Daiying Road South:


 


A. Land with a coverage of 18157.74 square meters; and


 


B. Yuanjiarun Wood Office Building; One (1) Main Workshop, Two (2) Affiliated Workshops, Employee Dormitory; Workshop Toilet.


 


    2.  The term of this Agreement (“Term”) is ten (10) years, starting on June 1, 2009 and ending on May 31, 2019.







3.   The annual rent for the Leased Property is RMB 120,000, payable in equal installment each quarter.  The Parties may adjust the rent to reflect market fluctuation on or after the starting date of the 5th year of this Lease.







4.   The Leased Property shall be used for the purpose of Party B’s manufacturing and business activities.


 







    5.  Party B shall be responsible for the land use tax and the land lease fees as prescribed by the local government.







6.  Party B has the right of first refusal to purchase all the buildings on the leased land at a price of approximately RMB 6 million.







7.  Party A may eject Party B in the event of Party B’s refusing to pay rent in a bad faith, and Party A is entitled to a liquid damage of RMB 200,000 upon ejection.







8.  Either party’s election to terminate this Agreement before the expiration date constitutes a breach of contract.  The breaching party shall pay the non-breaching party a liquid damage of RMB 1,000,000.












 


 


1


 




  





  











  











           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and become effective as of the date first above written upon the signature and seals by both parties.







 


           Party A:  Linyi Xintai Construction Co. Ltd.







 


           Party B:  Linyi Chan Tseng Wood Co., Ltd.


 


 


2
IN RE C.E.J., JR.

No. COA08-1289.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from Pitt (03JT132).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 25, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 25, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0057. JERMAINE E. SPENCE v. STATE OF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SU20CV1325
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Financial Statements of Maxcor Financial Group Inc. at and as of September 30,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial 
Statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                            <C>                       <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-01-1997               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1997               SEP-30-1997    
<CASH>                          13,677,524                13,677,524
<RECEIVABLES>                    5,803,548                 5,803,548
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                      0                         0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                    0                         0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>              3,366,773                 3,366,773
<PP&E>                          11,795,826                11,795,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  80,936,023                80,936,023
<SHORT-TERM>                     5,802,491                 5,802,491
<PAYABLES>                               0                         0
<REPOS-SOLD>                             0                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                      0                         0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                       0                         0
<LONG-TERM>                      6,142,901                 6,142,901
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0                         0
<PREFERRED>                              0                         0
<COMMON>                             8,950                     8,950
<OTHER-SE>                      33,641,161                33,641,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    80,936,023                80,936,023
<TRADING-REVENUE>                   24,121                   484,721
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>               420,643                 1,244,431
<COMMISSIONS>                   42,355,643               128,472,164
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>            0                         0
<FEE-REVENUE>                            0                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 220,836                   668,099
<COMPENSATION>                  27,221,761                81,368,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  2,419,755                 8,617,612
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>       2,419,755                 8,617,612
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0                         0
<CHANGES>                                0                         0
<NET-INCOME>                        77,828                 1,218,831
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.01                      0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.01                      0.14

        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Charles R. GOODSON.

No. 182P10-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Charles R. Goodson, Bunn, for Goodson, Charles R.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of July 2015 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."

ERVIN, J. recused.
STATE v. Samuel Lee GASKINS.

No. 398P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Samuel L. Gaskins, Vanceboro, for Gaskins, Samuel Lee.

Scott E. Thomas, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of November 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the quarterly report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry
M. Neer, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Harry  M.  Neer
-----------------------------------------
Harry M. Neer,
Chief Executive Officer and President
July 29, 2004


     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Rockport  Healthcare  Group,  Inc.  and  will be retained by
Rockport  Healthcare  Group,  Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
# CE2004070EN.01019801.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/198 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/198

---

(2004/C 70 E/213)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3019/03

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(14 October 2003)

Subject:   Community funding and maintaining jobs

Subject:

Soflusa is a river transport company operating between Lisbon and Barreiro/Moita, and is proceeding to modernise its fleet with an eligible global investment of Euro 9 819 608, for which joint funding of 50 % from the ERDF was scheduled, and partially paid in 2002.

In the project submitted with the purpose of obtaining the funding, the undertakings given by Soflusa included maintaining their 254 existing jobs and creating a further 50.

Now, according to a statement issued by the company's workers' trade unions, Soflusa's administration has stated that this undertaking to maintain the jobs and create new ones is not going to be met, claiming in the media that this undertaking was an oversight, and thus rubbishing the social undertakings given in order to obtain Community funds, which is simply inadmissible.

What measures is the Commission going to take to ensure that Soflusa's administration meets its social commitments, and specifically those concerning job creation, which were taken as read when the Community funding was awarded?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(25 November 2003)

(25 November 2003)

The Commission would like to inform the Honourable Member that the President of the Commission is already aware of the problem, following a letter dated 6 October 2003 from the employees' trade union representatives. As mentioned in the reply to the trade unions, the Commission requested further information from the national authorities on 3 November 2003.

In addition, the Commission can confirm that no European Social Fund assistance was granted to the firm Soflusa.

---
32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Ralph M. Amato, Chief Executive Officer of BoysToys.com, Inc. (the "Small Business Issuer") do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:



(1) 	The Small Business Issuer's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Small Business Issuer.





|By:/s/ Ralph M. Amato Ralph M. Amato
Chief Executive Officer | Date:  May 12, 2006
|------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PL
BRANDS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JULY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                          8,453
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   774,661
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     66,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                868,752
<PP&E>                          1,076,409
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,064,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           916,066
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        9,143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      2,128,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    133,032
<SALES>                         752,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                752,345
<CGS>                           469,892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   469,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                266,677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (18,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (18,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (18,337)
<EPS-BASIC>                   .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .000



</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina, v. Demetrius BRYANT, Defendant.

No. COA14-1300.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          22,154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     49,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,111
<PP&E>                                       2,998,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,263,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,231,130
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,986
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,436,068
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,263,905
<SALES>                                      1,071,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,071,163
<CGS>                                          266,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,062,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               298,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             134,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (556,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (557,203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (557,203)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)



</TABLE>