alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 175 (Monday, September 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Dates: Week of September 5, 2005.

Place: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

Status: Public and Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 

Week of September 5, 2005

Friday, September 9, 2005

9 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative)
    a. Private Fuel Storage (Independent Spent Fuel Storage 
Installation) Docket No. 72-22-ISFSI; Review of Utah Contention K 
(Aircraft Crash Hazards) Rulings (Tentative).
* * * * *
    The Affirmation Session tentatively scheduled on Thursday, 
September 9, 2005, at 9:25 a.m. has been rescheduled tentatively on 
Friday, September 9, 2005, at 9 a.m.
    * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 
415-1292. Contact person for more information: Michelle Schroll, (301) 
415-1662.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability 
Program Coordinator, August Spector, at (301) 415-7080, TDD: (301) 415-
2100, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8d9d3cbf8d6cadb96dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3859534b78564a5b165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>. Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting 
notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in 
receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send 
an electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcb8b7ab9cb2aebff2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="50343b27103e22337e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 7, 2005.
R. Michelle Schroll,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-18070 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 2, 2021 t0222

Order 

Clerk

March 2, 2021

161634

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161634

COA: 353572 

Muskegon CC: 18-006437-FH

WALI ABDULLAH AHMAD, 18-006439-FH

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 28, 2020 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
* Pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40176

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JUAN GERARDO VALDEZ-BARRIENTOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:07-cr-1019

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Juan Valdez-Barrientos was convicted below of illegal reentry

into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)-(b). Prior to being

deported, Barrientos was convicted of indecency with a child in violation of Texas

Penal Code § 21.11(a)(1). Equating “indecency with a child” under Texas law

with “sexual abuse of a minor” for purposes of § 2L1.2 of the Federal Sentencing

Guidelines, the district court enhanced Barrientos’ offense level by sixteen and

imposed a sentence of seventy-eight months’ imprisonment. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 8, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40176

2

Barrientos contends that § 21.11(a)(1) proscribes conduct beyond that

falling within the ordinary and contemporary meaning of “sexual abuse of a

minor,” and therefore that his prior conviction under that statute is not a

legitimate basis for a crime-of-violence enhancement under the Guidelines.

Specifically, he argues that the definition of “child” under § 21.11(a)—a person

less than seventeen years of age—is inconsistent with the contemporary and

ordinary meaning of“minor” because, for purposes of many states’ statutory rape

laws, a person’s “age of consent” is deemed to be sixteen. See generally United

States v. Lopez-Deleon, 513 F.3d 472 (5th Cir. 2008) (discussing when children

reach the age of consent under various states’ statutory rape laws). 

As Barrientos admits, we have already addressed the issue of whether a

violation of § 21.11(a) constitutes sexual abuse of a minor for purposes of § 2L1.2;

in answering in the affirmative, we have stated that “‘a child younger than 17

years[]’ is clearly a ‘minor.’” United States v. Zavala-Sustaita, 214 F.3d 601, 604

(5th Cir. 2000) (quoting § 21.11(a)); see also United States v. Najera-Najera, 519

F.3d 509, 511 (5th Cir. 2008) (relying on Zavala-Sustaita in stating “under

generic-meaning analysis, a person younger than 17 years old is a ‘child’”).

Because our precedent forecloses Barrientos’ argument, the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3606 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3606

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the special immigrant nonminister religious worker program 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious 
Worker Program Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT NONMINISTER RELIGIOUS WORKER PROGRAM.

    (a) Extension.--Subclause (II) and subclause (III) of section 
101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) are amended by striking ``October 1, 2008,'' both 
places such term appears and inserting ``March 6, 2009,''.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall--
            (1) issue final regulations to eliminate or reduce fraud 
        related to the granting of special immigrant status for special 
        immigrants described in subclause (II) or (III) of section 
        101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
        U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)); and
            (2) submit a certification to Congress and publish notice 
        in the Federal Register that such regulations have been issued 
        and are in effect.
    (c) Report.--Not later than March 6, 2009, the Inspector General of 
the Department of Homeland Security shall submit to Congress a report 
on the effectiveness of the regulations required by subsection (b)(1).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that the Secretary of Homeland Security submits 
the certification described in subsection (b)(2) stating that the final 
regulations required by subsection (b)(1) have been issued and are in 
effect.

            Passed the Senate September 26 (legislative day, September 
      17), 2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3606

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend the special immigrant nonminister religious worker program 
                        and for other purposes.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES MICHAEL BECHER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 290 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**Exhibit 99.9**

**CONSENT OF CHRISTOPHER OSIOWY, P.GEO.**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibits thereto, ofGoldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the “Annual Report”), I, Christopher Osiowy, P.Geo., consent to (i) the use of and reference to the technical report dated31 December, 2015, entitled “Red Lake Operations, Ontario, Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report” (the “Technical Report”), or portions thereof, that was prepared by me, that I supervisedthe preparation of and/or was reviewed and approved by me, (ii) the use of and references to my name, including as an expert or “qualified person”, in connection with the Annual Report and the Technical Report, and (iii) theinformation derived or summarized from the Technical Report that is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto. 

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibits thereto intoRegistration Statement Nos. 333-126039,333-126040,333-151243,333-151251,333-174376,333-181116,333-188805,333-195816 and333-213153 on Form S-8,No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company. 

Date: March16, 2017
# CE2004078EN.01015901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/159 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/159

---

(2004/C 78 E/0163)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2736/03

by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission

(11 September 2003)

Subject:   Monkfish quotas

Subject:

Recent reports say that Cornish fishermen are putting their livelihoods and communities at risk because they have to throw back large amounts of their catch so as to comply with excessively strict quotas. In the light of this situation, will the Commission relax the restrictions on the populations of certain species, for example Monkfish, so as to prevent the loss of large quantities of dead fish that are thrown overboard?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(22 October 2003)

(22 October 2003)

The Commission is aware of reports of large amounts of discarding of small anglerfish (also called monkfish) in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Division VII (South-West Cornwall). This appears to be due to a higher than expected abundance of small anglerfish on the fishing grounds, in an area where a mixed fishery with megrims and sole is pursued.

It is clearly important to avoid waste caused by killing and discarding many small fish. However, allowing more fishing of these small fish is not a solution by itself, since many of these fish are too small to be marketed and the fish which are killed will not have a chance to grow and produce higher yields for the long term. It is also necessary to moderate fishing effort so that healthy adult stocks are maintained.

The Commission services requested additional scientific advice from ICES on this matter on 28 August 2003. ICES' revised advice is that the sum of the total allowable catches (TACs) for areas VII and VIII a, b, d, e could be increased from 19 372 tonnes (t) to 21 000 t for 2003, if this can be implemented without increased targeting of small anglerfish and without increased effort.

Based on this advice, the Commission services are preparing for the consideration of the Commission a proposal to increase the TACs for Division VII from 15810 t to 17138 t and for Sub-Divisions VIIIabde from 3 562 t to 3 862 t. The increase is allocated to two TACs because biological advice indicates that the stocks concerned are distributed in both areas. The Commission services are also keeping under review complementary measures that would avoid increased targeting of small anglerfish and also avoid increases in effort.

These proposals will be prepared for a decision at the Agriculture and Fisheries Council of 17 and 18 November.

---
Exhibit 32

                                 BIOCORAL, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Biocoral, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nasser Nassiri, the
President, CEO, Chairman of the Board of the Company and the Principal
Accounting Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                           /s/ Nasser Nassiri
                                           Nasser Nassiri
                                           President, CEO, Chairman of the Board
                                           and Principal Accounting Officer

Date: May 18, 2005
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
     I, Robert W. Zoller, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kitty Hawk,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        November 8, 2004 By:  /s/ ROBERT W. ZOLLER, JR.    Robert W. Zoller, Jr.    Chief Executive Officer and President
----

(2004/C 65 E/250)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2869/03

by Margrietus van den Berg (PSE) to the Commission

(26 September 2003)

Subject:   European and Developing Countries Trials Programme (EDCTP)

The EDCTP will support the implementation of clinical trials and strengthen collaboration between European and developing country scientists. How will intellectual property rights for products that emerge out of such collaborative research be managed/shared?

Answer given by Mr Busquin on behalf of the Commission

(24 October 2003)

During the discussions in the Parliament and in the Council, leading to the adoption of Decision 1209/2003/EC (1) of 16 June 2003 on Community participation on the EDCTP programme, a balance was sought between on the one hand encouraging the involvement of industry by providing adequate protection of intellectual property rights and on the other hand seeking an easy and affordable access to the results of the research activities for the population of developing countries. Article 2(g) reflects this compromise:

This provision is taken up by the new structure (a European Economic Interest Grouping — EEIG) created on 27 June 2003 in the Netherlands, which will implement the EDCTP programme.

The statutes of the EEIG already include dispositions reflecting Article 2(g) and the contract between the Commission and the EEIG will impose the same requirements. It is the responsibility of the EEIG to make sure this provision is implemented on a case by case basis for each of the clinical trials that it will be funding.

The Commission will closely monitor the implementation of Article 2(g) by the EEIG.

----

(1)  Decision 1209/2003/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 on Community participation in a research and development programme aimed at developing new clinical interventions to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis through a long term partnership between Europe and developing countries, undertaken by several Member States, OJ L 169, 8.7.2003.

----
exhibit10_2.htm


PREFERRED STOCK CANCELLATION AGREEMENT












This Preferred Stock Cancellation Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made by and between The Quercus Trust (the “Trust”) and Entech Solar, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, as of November 29, 2010 (the “Effective Date”).







RECITALS







Whereas, the Trust is a holder of 100 shares of Series I Preferred Stock of the Company, which gives the holder the right to appoint two directors to the Board of Directors of the Company;







Whereas, the Trust has requested that the Company and the Trust agree to cancel the Series I Preferred Stock;







Whereas, the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to enter into this Agreement.







AGREEMENT







Now, therefore, in consideration of the foregoing and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:








	
1.  

	
Cancellation.  The Trust has concurrently with the execution hereof delivered to Company the original certificate for the Series I Preferred Stock, which is hereby cancelled.













	
2.  

	
Miscellaneous.












a.           Successors, Assigns and Transferees.  This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, heirs, legatees, successors and assigns.







b.           Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.







c.           Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, by the original parties hereto and any successor in interest, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement.







d.           Severability.  In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained herein, or the application thereof in any circumstances, is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect for any reason, the validity, legality and enforceability of any such provision in every other respect and of the remaining provisions contained herein shall not be in any way impaired thereby.







[Signature Page Follows]






  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Preferred Stock Cancellation Agreement as of the date first above written.

















Entech Solar, Inc.












By:           /s/ Shelley Hollingsworth__


Name:      Shelley Hollingsworth


Title:        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

















The Quercus Trust


 







/s/ David Gelbaum                                           


David Gelbaum, Trustee
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1)      	The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Dated:  August 11, 2010 | By:  RALPH M. AMATO
RALPH M. AMATO
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------