alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-19-0000710

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CLAY MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CR. NO. 1CPC-18-0001102)

ORDER APPROVING THE NOVEMBER 12, 2021

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Hiraoka, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal of

Appeal, filed November 12, 2021, and executed by counsel for

Defendant-Appellant Clay Marshall (Marshall) and the State of

Hawai#i, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that:

(1) the appeal has been docketed;

(2) Marshall seeks to dismiss the appeal;

(3) the motion includes Marshall's declaration showing

he understands the consequences of voluntary dismissal,

consistent with Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule

42(c); and 

(4) dismissal is authorized by HRAP Rule 42(b) and (c).

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000710

22-NOV-2021

07:47 AM

Dkt. 85 OAWST
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation to

dismiss the appeal is approved, and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 22, 2021.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

2
ARNESEN, et al v. RIVERS EDGE GOLF CLUB AND PLANTATION, INC., et al.

No. 375A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Oct. 10, 2014.

C. Wes Hodges, II, Wilmington, for Charuk, Deborah et al.

*884Sarah R. Buzzard.

J. Nicholas Ellis, Rocky Mount, for Branch Banking and Trust Company, et al.

Mr. David Dreifus.

Jacob H. Wellman, Raleigh, for Powell, James, et al.

**Opinion**

The following Order was entered:

Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31(a) and (b)(2) and Rule 15(e)(2) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court on its own initiative hereby certifies for review prior to determination in the Court of Appeals *Arnesen, et al. v. Rivers Edge Golf Club And Plantation, Inc.,* COA14-870. The case shall be docketed in this Court as of the date of this order. Briefs of the respective parties that have been submitted to the Court of Appeals shall be considered by this Court. Any party may file a new brief in this Court consistent with the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Encision
Inc. balance sheet as of September 30, 2000 and statements of operations and
cash flows for the three months ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 576,159
<SECURITIES>                                           700,914
<RECEIVABLES>                                          458,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                             8,000
<INVENTORY>                                            734,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     2,514,676
<PP&E>                                                 771,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (629,250)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       2,791,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  491,648
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            16,941,317
<OTHER-SE>                                             290,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         2,791,016
<SALES>                                                655,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       655,245
<CGS>                                                  322,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          597,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        24,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (275,815)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (275,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (275,815)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.05)



</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Vincent HAYES.

No. 474P11-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Charles Vincent Hayes, for Hayes, Charles Vincent.

Pat Robison, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th of December 2014 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) LIN
TELEVISION CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) LIN
TELEVISION CORPORATION QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000931058
<NAME>  LIN TELEVISION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,791
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,667
<PP&E>                                         206,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,045,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,377
<BONDS>                                        299,427
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     659,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,045,858
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,166
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  175,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,612
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (85)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,393)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,425
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (53,818)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (53,818)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 33 E/137)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1599/03

by Caroline Jackson (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(12 May 2003)

Subject:   US Classification of genetically engineered crops (follow up to question H-0433/98)

Further to question H-0433/98 (1), what changes, if any has the US Department of Agriculture made to the US organic food standards so as to allow genetically engineered crops and the products of intensive animal rearing to be classified as organic?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(23 June 2003)

The National Organic Programme as laid down by the American Department of Agriculture defines the official American organic farming standards. It came into force on 22 October 2002.

Compared to the proposed National Organic Programme to which oral question H-0433/98 during question time at Parliament's May 1998 session by the Honourable Member was referring, the American Department of Agriculture has made a number of changes in the final rule.

As to genetically modified organisms, the National Organic Programme in its final rule excludes the following ‘excluded methods: a variety of methods used to genetically modify organisms or influence their growth and development by means that are not possible under natural conditions or processes and are not considered compatible with organic production. Such methods include cell fusion, microencapsulation and macroencapsulation, and recombinant DNA technology (including gene deletion, gene doubling, introducing a foreign gene, and changing the positions of genes when achieved by recombinant DNA technology). Such methods do not include the use of traditional breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization, in vitro culture or tissue culture’ (National Organic Program, § 205.2). An exception is made for vaccines (National Organic Program, § 205.105(e)).

As to livestock production, the National Organic Programme requires living conditions which accommodate the health and natural behaviour of the animals, including access to the outdoors, shade, shelter, exercises areas, fresh air, and direct sunlight suitable to the species, its stage of production, the climate and the environment, and access to pasture for ruminants. (National Organic Program, § 205.239(a)). Also, ‘the producer of an organic livestock operation must manage manure in a manner that does not contribute to contamination of crops, soil or water by plant nutrients, heavy metals, or pathogenic organisms and optimises recycling of nutrients’ (National Organic Program, § 205.239(c)).

----

(1)  Written answer of 12 May 1998.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from balance
sheets and income statements of Freedom Chemical Company and Subsidiaries and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,115
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  47,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                   609
<INVENTORY>                                    55,186
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,075
<PP&E>                                         132,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                 31,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 264,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          47,689
<BONDS>                                        125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          46,882
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2
<OTHER-SE>                                     (22,713)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   264,186
<SALES>                                        70,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               70,675
<CGS>                                          55,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  55,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (326)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   52
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,809)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        




</TABLE>
REALTY WORLD PROFESSIONALS, INC. v. TILLERY TRADITION, INC.

No. COA07-501.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 16, 2008.

Certification Date October 6, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (06CVS5087).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2002 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

| |                                                                                                               |                              
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
| | By:                                                                                                           | /s/ Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D.
| |                                                                                                               |                              
| | Name: Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D.
         Title: President and Chief Executive
Officer Date: November 14, 2002

I, David R. Waltz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

| |                                                                                       |                   
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------
| | By:                                                                                   | /s/ David R. Waltz
| |                                                                                       |                   
| | Name: David R. Waltz 
        Title: Vice President Finance
 
Date: November 14, 2002
Exhibit 99.1

                                  JETFLEET III

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with this quarterly report of JetFleet III (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Neal D.
Crispin, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as
of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
              indicated.



Date: November 14, 2002                /s/  Neal D. Crispin
                                       ------------------------------
                                            Neal D. Crispin
                                            President, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Peter Papano, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PETER PAPANO                                                   
|Peter Papano Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer October 31, 2008
----

(2004/C 65 E/236)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2816/03

by Joan Vallvé (ELDR) to the Commission

(19 September 2003)

Subject:   Community initiatives

The Berlin European Council of March 1999 approved the economic resources for the Structural Funds and the Community Initiatives for 2000-2006.

The Community Initiatives support European-scale policies on completing the Union. They are activities which the Commission proposes to the Member States, with a view to resolving specific existing programmes throughout Union territory. They supplement the work of the Community Support Frameworks and the Single Programming Documents, which the Commission and the Member States negotiated on the basis of regional or national development plans.

For 2000-2006, over which period the Commission wished to step up the European dimension of the Community Initiatives, and likewise the way in which it complements priority objectives.

Four Community Initiatives are to be carried out, each one funded by one of the Structural Funds:

There is a danger that some of these Community Initiatives will be claimed by the Member States, on the understanding that they are domestic policies.

What does the Commission think of the renationalisation of the Community Initiatives, and specifically, Interreg III — Chapter A, on cross-border cooperation?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(23 October 2003)

The Commission will make proposals for cohesion policy for the period after 2006 in the Third Cohesion Report which is scheduled for publication before the end of this year. While it is too early to speculate on the nature of these proposals, they will take account of the contributions to the debate on future cohesion policy that the Commission launched in January 2001 with the publication of the Second Cohesion Report. The Parliament has been fully associated with this debate. The Commission's proposals will also include those regarding the future of the Community Initiatives, taking into account their added value in relation to the interventions supported under the mainstream regional development programmes.

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10178 and <greek-i>10179]


Mississippi Disaster Number MS-00005

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1604-DR), dated 8/29/
2005.
    Incident: Hurricane Katrina.
    Incident Period: 8/29/2005 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 9/6/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/28/2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 5/29/2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort 
Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Mississippi, dated 8/29/2005, is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties

    ADAMS
    ATTALA
    CLAIBORNE
    CHOCTAW
    CLARKE
    COPIAH
    COVINGTON
    FRANKLIN
    HINDS
    JASPER
    JEFFERSON
    JEFFERSON DAVIS
    JONES
    KEMPER
    LAUDERDALE
    LAWRENCE
    LEAKE
    LINCOLN
    LOWNDES
    MADISON
    NESHOBA
    NEWTON
    NOXUBEE
    OKTIBBEHA
    RANKIN
    SCOTT
    SIMPSON
    SMITH
    WARREN
    WAYNE
    WINSTON
    YAZOO

Contiguous Counties

MISSISSIPPI
    CARROLL
    CLAY
    HOLMES
    HUMPHREYS
    ISSAQUENA
    MONROE
    MONTGOMERY
    SHARKEY
    WEBSTER
ALABAMA
    CHOCTAW
    LAMAR
    PICKENS
    SUMTER
LOUISIANA
    EAST CARROLL
    MADISON
    TENSAS
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Cheri L. Cannon,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-18201 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
HAWKINS v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA08-632.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 18, 2008.

Certification Date December 8, 2008.

Appeal from Vance (07CVS1024).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.