alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# AGENCY:

Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Change in meeting date.

# SUMMARY:

This notice advises all interested persons of change in the date of a public meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform.

# DATES:

This meeting scheduled to be held on Friday, September 23, 2005, has been postponed. This meeting will be rescheduled and announced at a later date.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Panel staff at (202) 927-2TAX (927-2829) (not a toll-free call) or e-mail                         *info@taxreformpanel.gov*                         (please do not send comments to this box). Additional information is available at                         *http://www.taxreformpanel.gov.*

Dated: September 12, 2005.

Mark S. Kaizen,

Designated Federal Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-18356 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4811-33-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0306

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM JOSEPH CLAUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 14, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 7 2022

10/07/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0306
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 412 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ‘‘Lane Evans Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2007 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. OBAMA) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Lane Evans Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LANE EVANS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, 

6 Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lane 

7 Evans Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 412 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lane Evans Post Of3 fice Building’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
----

(2004/C 33 E/120)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1453/03

by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(28 April 2003)

Subject:   European Parliament resolution of 28 January 1999 (A4-0005/1999) on the environment, security and foreign policy

With reference to paragraphs 26 to 29 of the European Parliament resolution of 28 January 1999 on the environment, security and foreign policy (A4-0005/1999 (1)):

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(3 July 2003)

The High frequency Active Auroral Research Programme (HAARP) for Arctic Europe is a military programme. The Commission has no competence, nor indeed the expertise, to carry out the examination requested by the Parliament in paragraph 26 of its Resolution.

With regard to the requests made in paragraphs 27 to 29, these deal with international treaties and standards which are predominantly concerned with military questions, e.g. on disarmament, and therefore fall within the competence of the Member States.

----

(1)OJ C 128, 7.5.1999, p. 92.

----
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




Summary of Terms

Letter of Credit Facility




	 	 	 
	Account Party:
	 	Alterra Bermuda Limited

	Facility Amount:

Letter of Credit fee:
	 	GBP 30,000,000

Uncommitted

15bps per annum payable quarterly in arrears in respect

of LOCs collateralized by cash.

	Facility:
	 	Letter of Credit facility will be available in US and

Canadian dollars and British Pounds Sterling. Other

currencies available with appropriate currency margins

as defined in the Reinsurance Deposit Agreement.

	Purpose of facility:
	 	To provide Letters of Credit in support of the Account

Party’s Funds at Lloyds (FAL) obligations.

	Maturity date of

each Letter of Credit:
	 	The maximum tenor of each Letter of Credit will be up to

4 years inclusive of any notice period to the

beneficiaries.

Each Letter of Credit, if requested by the Account

Party, may include a clause to the effect that the

Letter of Credit will automatically be extended for

successive periods that may vary from time to time but

which in no event is greater than 1 calendar year.

	Facility collateral

monitoring:

Letter of Credit issuer:

Collateral Custodian:
	 	Citibank Europe Plc.

Citibank N.A.

Citibank N.A. London




	Collateral:

Documentation:

Legal Expenses:
	 	The Account Party will provide collateral over a Charged

Portfolio in an amount equal to the Required Value (as

defined in the Reinsurance Deposit Agreement).

Cash deposits are to be held in an account(s) held with

Citibank N.A., London

The Facility shall remain subject to the following

executed documentation (each as amended, varied,

supplemented, novated or assigned as the case may be)

and comprising the following:-

Form 3 Master Reimbursement Agreement

Form 12 Reinsurance Deposit Agreement

Bank Mandate; and

Contingent communications documents.

All Citibank’s legal costs will be for the Account Party.







     


For and on behalf of Alterra Bermuda Limited
Exhibit 10.1.1


February 18, 1999


Mr. Robert S. Benou 

525 Hillside Avenue 

Mountainside, New Jersey 07092


Dear Mr. Benou:


          Reference
is made to the Employment Agreement between you and Conolog Corporation, dated
as of June 1, 1997 (the “Employment Agreement”), as amended by an amendment
dated as of November 1, 1997 (the “Amendment”).


          This
is to set forth our agreement and understanding as follows:


          1.     The
sentence inserted after the first sentence of section 3.01 by the Amendment is
hereby deleted.


          2.     Within
30 days after the execution of this letter, the Company will pay you a bonus
equal to the amount you would have received had your salary been $190,000 per annum
as of June 1, 1998. Effective the date hereof, your salary will be $190,000 per
annum and will increase annually as provided in the Employment Agreement.


          3.     Except
as expressly provided herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its original terms.


          If
the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, kindly so indicate by
signing this letter in the space provided below.


	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 Very truly yours, 

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 CONOLOG CORPORATION

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 By

 	
     

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 	

 


 
	
  

 	
 (Title)

 	
 Exec. VP

 






	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
 AGREED:

 
	
 

 	
  

 
	

 


 	
  

 
	
 Robert S. Benou
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                                4,411
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         3,536
<ALLOWANCES>                                          2,800
<INVENTORY>                                             891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      6,833
<PP&E>                                                6,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                        4,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        8,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 4,637
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 21
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          8,436
<SALES>                                               2,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      2,263
<CGS>                                                 1,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         1,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      (44)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (6,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (6,641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (6,641)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.33)



</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-08-400-CV 

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

PROGRESO CO-OP GIN, INC., Appellant,

v.

CINTAS CORPORATION, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Progreso Co-Op Gin, Inc., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order

entered by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number

CL-05-1885-D. The order subject to appeal, a Take Nothing Judgment, was signed on

April 3, 2008, but the notice of appeal was not filed until May 20, 2008. 
 Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal

was due on May 5, 2008. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an

appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule

26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for

extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18, 619 (Tex. 1997)

(construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, appellant must provide a reasonable

explanation for the late filing: it is not enough to simply file a notice of appeal. Id.; Woodard

v. Higgins, 140 S.W.3d 462, 462 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2004, no pet.); In re B.G., 104

S.W.3d 565, 567 (Tex. App.–Waco 2002, no pet.).

On June 23, 2008, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that

steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that,

if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter,

the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant

providing a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal.

 The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s

failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s notice,

is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly,

the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a)(c).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 29th day of August, 2008.
POTTLE, et al. v. LINK, et al.

No. 27PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 10, 2008.

G. Grady Richardson, Jr., Sidney S. Eagles, Jr., Elizabeth Brooks Scherer, Raleigh, for Link and Willetts.

David S. Pokela, Greensboro, for Duke Energy Carolinas.

Matthew D. Rhoad, Andrea B. Short, Raleigh, for CP&L, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of July 2008 *89by Plaintiffs for Extension of Time to File New Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiffs (Pottle, et al.) shall have up to and including the 11th day of August 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of July 2008."
### NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00 6 50

- C R



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

RAFAEL ADRIAN AGUAYO

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 398 th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently before the Court on appellant's unopposed sixth motion for

extension of time to file the brief. Current c ounsel was appointed to represent appellant

on October 23, 2015 and the appellate record was complete upon the filing of a fourth

supplemental clerk’s record on January 25, 2016. T his Court has granted current2

counsel one previous extension of 60 days to file th e brief, and appellant now seeks an

additional 45 days, until June 1, 2016

, to file the brief.

The Co urt GRANTS appellant’s unopposed sixth motion for extension to file the

brief and ORDERS the Honorable Victoria Guerra to file the brief on or before June 1,

2016

. The Court looks with disfavor on the delay caused by counsel’s failure to timely

file a brief in this matter. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent

circumstances. If counsel fails to file the brief within the specified period of time, the

Court will act appropriately to ensure that appellant's rights are protected. See id. R.

38.8(b)(4).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

25 th day of April

, 201 6

.
Exhibit 11.1

                         APPLIED VOICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                      
                                                                                 
                                       Quarter ended      Nine months ended      
                                        September 30,       September 30,
                                   -------------------   -------------------
                                      1996      1995      1996       1995
                                    -------    -------  -------    --------
                                     (in thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>

Net income (loss)                   $ 1,573    $1,502    $ (26)     $4,039
                                    =======    ======    ======     ======
                                                                

Computation of common 
and common equivalent shares 
outstanding:
               Common Stock           5,410     5,102     5,361      5,082
               Options                  696       603       703        658                                           
                                                                           
Common and common 
equivalent shares used in
computing per share amounts           6,106     5,705     6,064      5,740
                                    =======    ======    ======     ======

Net income (loss) per share         $  0.26    $ 0.26    $( - )     $ 0.70
                                    =======    ======    ======     ======


The fully diluted computation is not presented because the Company does not have
dilutive securities that are not common stock equivalent
                                                                            


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Jamario Jermaine McCLURE.

No. COA15-266.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 20, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
Filed 9/7/16 P. v. Nicholson CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ELDRED ANDRE NICHOLSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

F070990

(Super. Ct. No. 14CM7411)

OPINION

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County. Michael J. 

Reinhart, Judge.

J. Edward Jones, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant.

Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and 

Respondent.

-ooOoo-

 

* Before Kane, Acting P.J., Franson, J. and Peña, J.
2

Appointed counsel for defendant Eldred Andre Nicholson asked this court to

review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. 

(People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth 

the facts of the case and requests that we review the record. Defendant was advised of 

the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening 

brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. 

Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, 

we affirm the judgment.

We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of 

the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

On December 11, 2014, defendant pled no contest to three counts of battery on a 

correctional officer (Pen. Code, § 4501.5).1 His five prior strike allegations were 

dismissed. The trial court sentenced him to five years in prison: the middle term of 

three years on count 1, plus one year each for counts 2 and 3. The court ordered 

defendant to pay a $300 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)); a suspended $300 parole 

revocation fine (§ 1202.45); a $40 court operations assessment fine (§ 1465.8, 

subd. (a)(1)); and a $30 conviction assessment fine (Gov. Code, § 70373). The court 

waived the restitution fines on counts 2 and 3, and imposed only a $40 court operations 

assessment fine (§ 1465.8, subd. (a)(1)) and a $30 conviction assessment fine (Gov. 

Code, § 70373) on each count. 

On January 28, 2015, defendant filed a notice of appeal. The trial court granted 

his request for a certificate of probable cause.

 

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise noted.
3

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no evidence of 

ineffective assistance of counsel or any other arguable error that would result in a 

disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.14

CONSENT OF ERIC CHEN

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the
AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and/or documents:



|1. | The technical report that has an effective date of January 26, 2012, entitled Éléonore Gold Project Quebec, Canada NI 43-101 Technical
Report (the Éléonore Report); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Éléonore Report and the Éléonore
Project, and the properties described therein.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such
information contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376 and 333-181116 on Form S-8 of the Company.



|                    |  |                         
|------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Date: March 1, 2013 |  |                         
|                    | 
|                    |  | /s/ Eric Chen           
|                    |  | Name: Eric Chen, P. Geo.