alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,648
<SECURITIES>                                    21,577
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,209
<PP&E>                                           5,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,725
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,955
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,854
<SALES>                                         73,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,570
<CGS>                                           27,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,353
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,228
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,228
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Zimmerman Truck Lines, Inc. and Chad

Frymire

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Katrina Pastran

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 131

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012DCV04303 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until March 14, 2018

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. John Mobbs , the Appellee’s Attorney, prepare

the Appellee’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 14, 2018

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 2 th day of February, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
# CE2004078EN.01009202.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/92 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/92

---

(2004/C 78 E/0092)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2440/03

by Diana Wallis (ELDR) to the Commission

(16 July 2003)

Subject:   Addition of water and protein to chicken meat

Subject:

The Commission is well aware of the scandalous situation where adulterated and incorrectly labelled chicken meat is being imported in large quantities into the UK. Trading Standards Officers in Hull have been pursuing this racket for six years. Most of this processed meat is exported from the Netherlands. In the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, the Dutch authorities claimed to have ended fraudulent practices on 13 June 2002, but this is clearly not the case. Indeed, the problem is getting worse as the processors are now using blocking agents to produce a negative PCR result for most tests.

Consumers and certain religious communities are being misled by the immoral practice of adding beef and pork proteins to chicken meat which is then labelled Halal. This is completely unacceptable. What immediate action will the Commission take to suspend exports of such products? Will the Commission bring forward urgently-needed legislation to limit the maximum allowable percentage of added water to 15 % and ban the use of protein additives?

Joint answer to

Written Questions E-2207/03 and P-2440/03

given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(12 September 2003)

(12 September 2003)

The present Community legislation does not provide for a limit to the amount of water that can be added to poultrymeat preparations and poultrymeat products. On the other hand, the fraudulent practice of not indicating in the label the artificial increase of the weight of meat by the addition of proteins and water should be strictly controlled and any fraud prosecuted by the competent authority in the Member State. The Commission has been alerted already and consideration is being given to the possibility of emphasising the water content on the labelling of meat preparations. Moreover, the Commission is also studying the possibility of developing standards to limit the amount of water that can be added to such products.

Any possible future initiative by the Commission in this area will take into full account the need to respect the World Trade Organisation/Technical Barries to Trade (WTO/TBT) obligations.

The indication of all ingredients used in the manufacture of any foodstuff, and still present in the finished product, is compulsory according to Directive 2000/13/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs (1). Also the use of animal proteins in feed for livestock is well regulated within the Union and indication of different feed materials will be compulsory when labelling feed for livestock as from 6 November 2003.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 109, 6.5.2000.

1

---
NUMBER 13-08-00452-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

EDUARDO V. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,

v.

JUAN GUAJARDO, JR., INDIVIDUALLY 

AND J. GUAJARDO, JR. FARMS, INC., Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 404th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Eduardo V. Rodriguez, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by

the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2007-01-619-G.

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that he incorrectly filed a

Notice of Accelerated Appeal when he filed the Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Appellant
2

requests that Cause Number 13-08-00452-CV be dismissed, so that only the Petition for

Writ of Mandamus, Cause Number 13-08-0411-CV, remain.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for

rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 29th day of August, 2008.
iii i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00515-CV

Elfreddie LEE, Jr., et al.,

Appellants

v.

COUNTY OF GUADALUPE,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 92-0636-CV

Honorable Dwight E. Peschel, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 20, 2008

DISMISSED

Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, and appellee has not opposed the

dismissal. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellants.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LIN
TELEVISION CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH LIN
TELEVISION CORPORATION QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000931058
<NAME> LIN TELEVISION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          38,029
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,141
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,887
<PP&E>                                         130,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,785,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,781
<BONDS>                                        469,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     732,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,785,734
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,574
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  146,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   337
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,720
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,191
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,620)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,620)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina, v. David Eli LAYNE, Jr., Defendant.

No. COA 15-98.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 6, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error in Part, Dismissed in Part.
EXHIBIT 10.65

                              August 5, 1997


Mr. Don L. McIntire
12625 Memorial Drive #140
Houston, Texas  77024

Re:  STOCK  OPTION  AGREEMENT  DATED AS OF APRIL  24,  1997  BETWEEN  DON  L.
     McINTIRE  AND  READING  & BATES CORPORATION - OPTIONS  WITH  RESPECT  TO
     40,000 SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK OF READING & BATES CORPORATION

Dear Don:

Reading  &  Bates  Corporation  (the  "Company")  requests  you  agree  to  a
rescission  of  the  stock options awarded pursuant to  the  above-referenced
agreement, subject to:  (a) completion of the transaction described  in  that
Agreement  and  Plan of Merger dated as of July 10, 1997 among,  inter  alia,
Falcon  Drilling  Company, Inc. and the Company and  (b)  such  merger  being
accounted  for  on  a "pooling of interests" basis.  If the  transaction,  as
described in such agreement, is not completed or is completed thereunder  and
accounted  for on any basis other than a "pooling of interests", the  Company
agrees  such rescission shall be of no legal effect, and the above-referenced
stock options and award agreement shall be restored to full force and effect,
as if this letter agreement had never existed.

If  the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement in the
space provided below, and return one fully executed copy of this letter to us
for our files.

                              Very truly yours,

                              READING & BATES CORPORATION


                              By:
                                   Paul B. Loyd, Jr.

                              Its: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Agreed this        day of August, 1997.


Mr. Don L. McIntire
Exhibit 32

                                 BIOCORAL, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Biocoral, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nasser Nassiri, the
President, CEO, Chairman of the Board of the Company and the Principal
Accounting Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ Nasser Nassiri
                                          ------------------
                                          Nasser Nassiri
                                          President, CEO, Chairman of the Board
                                          and Principal Accounting Officer

Date: March 30, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel; R21's.
    Date: March 4, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Hua-Chuan Sim, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, 
6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-1833 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 743 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to modify the individuals eligible 

for associate membership in the Military Order of the Purple Heart 

of the United States of America, Incorporated. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2007 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mrs. LINCOLN, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. 

HAGEL, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. 

SMITH, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. 

BUNNING, Mr. ISAKSON, and Mr. THOMAS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to modify the individuals eligible for associate membership in the Military 

Order of the Purple Heart of the United States of America, Incorporated. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•S 743 CPS

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR 

2 ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN MILITARY 

3 ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART OF THE 

4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INCOR5 PORATED. 

6 Section 140503(b) of title 36, United States Code, 

7 is amended by inserting ‘‘, spouses, siblings,’’ after ‘‘par8 ents’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
In the Matter of D.H., J.H., J.H.

No. COA15-237.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Sept. 1, 2015.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINON**

Affirmed.
[Cite as State v. Jones, 2024-Ohio-121.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,

Appellee,

 - vs -

ANDREW JONES,

Appellant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO. CA2023-07-071

D E C I S I O N

 1/16/2024

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. CR2020-07-0939

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Willa Concannon, Assistant 

Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Law Office of John H. Forg, and John H. Forg, III, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Andrew Jones, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of 

proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and 

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review 

of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 
Butler CA2023-07-071

- 2 -

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists four potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of 

both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response 

having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error 

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel 

for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed 

for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., HENDRICKSON and PIPER, JJ., concur.

NOTICE TO THE CLERK:

Serve a copy of this decision upon appellant at: Andrew Jones, #A817259, 

Pickaway Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 209, Orient, OH 43146
[Cite as State v. Jones, 2024-Ohio-121.]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEWAY MANGISTU, an individual,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

MORTON LA KRETZ, an individual; et 

al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-56860

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-05271-SJO-RZ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017**

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Neway Mengistu appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 

housing discrimination action sua sponte for failure to prosecute. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Oliva 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 27 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 12-56860 

v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 272, 274 (9th Cir. 1992). We vacate and remand.

The district court dismissed Mengistu’s action with prejudice for failure to 

prosecute after Mengistu did not appear on time at a scheduling conference. The 

district court failed to consider the adequacy of less drastic sanctions, such as 

dismissal without prejudice. See id. (“A district court abuses its discretion if it 

imposes a sanction of dismissal without first considering the impact of the sanction 

and the adequacy of less drastic sanctions.” (citation and internal quotation marks 

omitted)); see also Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992) 

(“[D]ismissal is a harsh penalty and, therefore, it should only be imposed in 

extreme circumstances.”). Accordingly, we vacate and remand for further 

proceedings.

We do not consider documents not filed with the district court. See United 

States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not 

presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”); Lowry v. 

Barnhart, 329 F.3d 1019, 1024 (9th Cir. 2003) (setting forth limited exceptions).

Accordingly, Mengistu’s request to supplement the appellate record with 

documents not presented to the district court, filed June 12, 2015, is denied.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.
 3 12-56860 

VACATED and REMANDED.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Kofax Image Products, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-40325 on Form S-8 of our report dated August 9, 1999, (except for paragraph
2 of Note 5 and Note 12, as to which the date is September 9, 1999) appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kofax Image Products, Inc. for year ended
June 30, 1999.

Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report
also included the financial statement schedule of Kofax Image Products, Inc.,
listed in Item 14(a). This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.



Costa Mesa, California
September 27, 1999