alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit10-6.htm


Exhibit 10.6


 



ADDENDUM NO. 7


 


This Addendum No. 7, dated May 22, 2006, by and between Universal Insurance Holdings, Incorporated (hereinafter the “Company”), and Bradley I. Meier (“Employee”), modifies and amends the existing employment agreement (“Agreement) and any prior Addenda thereto (“Prior Addenda”) between the Company and the Employee, only in respect of the matters set forth herein, and otherwise the Agreement and Prior Addenda remain in full force and effect as if this Addendum No. 7 had not been executed:


 


In respect of “Article 6.” of the Agreement entitled “Compensation,” the Employee’s Base Compensation shall be increased by $150,000.00, per annum effective May 1, 2006.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum No. 7 has been signed and executed as of the first date written above.


 


 


 


 




 






	
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.


	  
	
By:

	
/s/ James M. Lynch             


Chief Financial Officer


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
/s/ Bradley I. Meier             


Bradley I. Meier - Employee
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004D-0251]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Requests for Inspection by an Accredited Person Under the Inspection by Accredited Persons Program” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Robbins, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of June 7, 2005 (70 FR 33179), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0569.   The approval expires on August 31, 2008.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: September 7, 2005.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-18222 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
In re Mark H. BADGETT.

No. 144A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 3, 2008.

Paul R. Ross, Executive Secretary, James J. Coman, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for Judicial Standards Commission.

J. Clark Fischer, Winston-Salem, for Badgett.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of June 2008 by Petitioner (Judicial Standards Commission) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Petitioner (Judicial Standards Commission) shall have up to and including the 9th day of July 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of June 2008."
#### Kelly Nephew, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs, v Klewin Building Company, Inc., et al., Defendants. McPhee Electric Ltd., LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v Ferguson Electric Construction Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[801 NYS2d 203]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Eugene M. Fahey, J.), entered January 4, 2005. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the cross motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff for summary judgment on the third-party complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the cross motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff is granted.

Same memorandum as in *Nephew v Klewin Bldg. Co.*(21 AD3d 1419 [2005]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                      ORTHODONTIC CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.
     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), of Orthodontic Centers of America, Inc. (the "Company"),
I, Bartholomew F. Palmisano, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

August 9, 2004                           /s/ Bartholomew F. Palmisano, Sr.
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Bartholomew F. Palmisano, Sr.
                                         Chairman of the Board, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              77
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                       106
<INVENTORY>                                      2,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,675
<PP&E>                                           5,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,080
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,099
<OTHER-SE>                                        (809)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,563
<SALES>                                          9,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,247
<CGS>                                            7,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (44)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   128
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (485)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (849)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (849)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.34)
        


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 15.2

AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

May 10, 2004

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated
May 6, 2004 on our review of interim
financial information of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International
(formerly ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) (the
Company) for the three month period ended
March 31, 2004 and included in the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 is incorporated by reference in
its Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-10661, 333-67376, 333-88040, 333-88042 and
333-112904), and
Form S-4 (No. 333-112906 and Forms S-8 (No. 33-56971, 333-81383,
333-73098, 333-85572, 333-109877 and 333-109879).

Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J.Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer of Equity Residential, general partner ofERPOP, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.

 

 
| /s/ David J. Neithercut |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| David J. Neithercut     |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| of Equity Residential   |   |   |
| August 7, 2007          |   |   |

 

** **

----
STATE of North Carolina, v. Wayne Allen DAVIS, Defendant.

No. COA15-220.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 6, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
# CE2004078EN.01018601.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/186 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/186

---

(2004/C 78 E/0192)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2887/03

by Bill Miller (PSE) to the Commission

(29 September 2003)

Subject:   Animal by-products

Subject:

How many incinerators are there in Europe burning animal by-products and in which countries are they?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(16 October 2003)

(16 October 2003)

The Commission does not have the information requested. However, according to the draft report on Best Available Techniques for waste incineration (1), about 421 installations are in operation in the Member States, and about 106 installations in the Candidate Countries. These installations burn mainly municipal waste, non-hazardous and hazardous industrial waste, sewage sludge and clinical waste. Among these waste types could also be fractions of animal by-products.

1

---

(1)  http://eippcb.jrc.es/pages/Factivities.htm.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2****SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**          In connection with the Annual Report of enherent Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Karl Brenza, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                         /s/ Karl Brenza   Karl Brenza   Chief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2006   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Margie ELLIS, Employee, Plaintiff, v. KEY CITY FURNITURE INC., Employer, and Stonewood Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants.

No. COA15-78.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Aug. 18, 2015.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted December 19, 2011

Decided January 13, 2012

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 11

‐ 2908

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee

,

v.

BERNARD ELLIS,

Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the

United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana,

South Bend Division.

No. 3:05

‐ CR

‐ 00131

‐ RLM

‐ 1

Robert L. Miller, Jr.,

Judge

.

O R D E R

A jury convicted Bernard Ellis, the chief enforcer for a Chicago street gang, of five

counts of aiding and abetting the making of a false statement intended to deceive a licensed

gun dealer in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 922(a)(6), and 924(a)(2), and four counts of

possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing the

judge determined that Ellis qualified as an armed career criminal, which (in combination

with other factors) placed him in criminal

‐ history category VI and resulted in an advisory

guidelines range of 360 months to life. The judge imposed a total sentence of 480 months.

Ellis appealed.

On appeal we reversed one of Ellis’s felon

‐ in

‐ possession convictions on double

‐ NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 11

‐ 2908 Page 2

jeopardy grounds but affirmed the remaining convictions. See United States v. Ellis

, 622 F.3d

784, 793

‐ 96 (7th Cir. 2010). We also vacated Ellis’s sentence after concluding that he did not

qualify as an armed career criminal. See id. at 796

‐ 800. Finally, we remanded the case for

resentencing.

On remand the sentencing judge determined that even without the armed

‐ career

‐

criminal designation, Ellis remained in criminal

‐ history category VI. Accordingly, his

advisory guidelines range was still 360 months to life. After hearing arguments from both

sides, the judge again imposed a total sentence of 480 months. Ellis appealed.

In this second appeal, Ellis challenges only the substantive reasonableness of his

sentence, which we review for abuse of discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51

(2007); United States v. Hill

, 645 F.3d 900, 911 (7th Cir. 2011). Ellis’s sentence falls within a

properly calculated guidelines range, so it is entitled to a presumption of reasonableness.

See Rita v. United States

, 551 U.S. 338, 347 (2007); United States v. Kilgore

, 591 F.3d 890, 895

(7th Cir. 2010).

Ellis’s appeal essentially asks us to substitute our judgment for that of the sentencing

judge. The judge acknowledged Ellis’s arguments for a lower sentence—which he repeats in

his appellate brief—but concluded that a 40

‐ year sentence was appropriate. Among other

things, the judge emphasized Ellis’s extensive criminal history, which involved multiple

violent crimes. As a result, the judge found that Ellis presented a heightened need for

punishment and deterrence. Ellis has not rebutted the presumption that this within

‐ guidelines sentence is reasonable; the judge did not abuse his discretion.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-44725 and 333-127500 on Form S-8 pertaining to enherent Corp.’s Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and enherent Corp.’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated March 29, 2007pertaining to the financial statements and related financial statement schedule of enherent Corp. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of enherent Corp. 

/s/ Cornick, Garber & Sandler, LLP 

New York, NY 

March 29, 2007
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit _____________

No. 23-50554

consolidated with

No. 23-50555

_____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Darlin Antonio Munoz-Perdomo, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC Nos. 4:23-CR-80-1, 4:19-CR-205-1

______________________________

Before Davis, Willett, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Darlin Antonio Munoz-Perdomo appeals his conviction and 46-month 

sentence for illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) 

and (b)(1), as well as the revocation of the term of supervised release he was 

serving at the time of the offense. He argues that § 1326(b) is 

unconstitutional because it allows a sentence above the otherwise applicable 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 27, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50554 Document: 52-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2024
No. 23-50554

c/w No. 23-50555

2

statutory maximum established by § 1326(a) based on facts that are neither 

alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. 

Because Munoz-Perdomo does not address the revocation or the revocation 

sentence, he has abandoned any challenge to them. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 

F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

With respect to his new illegal-reentry conviction, Munoz-Perdomo 

has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief 

correctly conceding that the only issue he raises is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis, 937 

F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). He explains that he has raised the issue to 

preserve it for possible further review. Accordingly, because summary 

disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 

1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Munoz-Perdomo’s motion is GRANTED, and the 

district court’s judgments are AFFIRMED.

Case: 23-50554 Document: 52-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2024
# C_2008197EN.01003801.xml

| 2.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/38

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2008 — Huober v Council

(Case F-4/05)

(2008/C 197/74)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register, following amicable settlement.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from balance
sheets and income statements of Freedom Chemical Company and Subsidiaries
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000931075 
<NAME>                        FREEDOM CHEMICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1                     
<CASH>                                         2,100
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  47,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                   580
<INVENTORY>                                    48,030
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,004
<PP&E>                                         100,609
<DEPRECIATION>                                 34,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          45,660
<BONDS>                                        125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          48,390
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2
<OTHER-SE>                                     (29,733)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,764
<SALES>                                        75,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               75,617
<CGS>                                          57,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  60,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (149)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   227
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,946)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,946)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>