alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 33 E/262)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2339/03

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(16 July 2003)

Subject:   Relocation of the American Tool company away from Albergaria-a-Velha

The multinational company American Tool has a factory in Albergaria-a-Velha, where it produces saws of various types and other cutting tools. On 27 June 2003 it notified its workforce that it intends to close down its operations in Portugal with effect from September, to which end it has already launched the process which will result in the collective dismissal of all 74 of its employees.

In a letter to those employees the company has cited ‘reasons relating to technology and to the current economic situation’ as grounds for closing its factory in Albergaria-a-Velha and relocating part of its production to Denmark.

American Tool's announcement has come as a complete surprise, since the company and the group to which it belongs were not known to be in financial difficulty. In addition to its factory in Denmark, the group has several plants in other EU countries, in particular Spain and Italy.

Would the Commission say whether or not the company has received EU support and, if so, how much?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(29 August 2003)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

----
# C_2009282EN.01003501.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/35

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 September 2009 — Hoechst v Commission

(Case T-161/05) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for monochloroacetic acid - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Market sharing and price-fixing - Attributability of the infringement - Fines - Proportionality - Cooperation - Aggravating circumstances - Repeated infringement - Access to the file - Report of the Hearing Officer - Order to bring the infringement to an end)

2009/C 282/64

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hoechst GmbH, formerly Hoechst AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented initially by M. Klusmann and U. Itzen, and subsequently by M. Klusmann, U. Itzen and S. Thomas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by A. Bouquet, F. Amato and M. Schneider, and subsequently by A. Bouquet and M. Kellerbauer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, principally, for annulment of Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision C(2004) 4876 final of 19 January 2005 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/37.773 — MCAA) and, in the alternative, application for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Hoechst AG in Article 2(b) of Commission Decision C(2004) 4876 final of 19 January 2005 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/37.773 — MCAA) at EUR 66 627 million; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Hoechst AG in Article 2(b) of Commission Decision C(2004) 4876 final of 19 January 2005 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/37.773 — MCAA) at EUR 66 627 million;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 25.6.2005.

1

---
# C_2009282EN.01003702.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/37

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 October 2009 — Estonia v Commission

(Case T-324/05) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Transitional measures to be adopted by reason of the accession of new Member States - Regulation (EC) No 832/2005 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector - Action for annulment - Collegiality - Concept of ‘stock’ - Circumstances in which stocks were built up - Statement of reasons - Sound administration - Good faith - Non-discrimination - Right of property - Proportionality)

2009/C 282/69

Language of the case: Estonian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: L. Uibo, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: intially L. Visaggio and E. Randvere and subsequently by T. van Rijn, H. Tserepa-Lacombe and E. Randvere, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: intially E. Balode-Buraka, L. Ostrovska and K. Drēviņa, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 832/2005 of 31 May 2005 on the determination of surplus quantities of sugar, isoglucose and fructose for the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (OJ 2005 L 138, p. 3)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Estonia to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Estonia to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission of the European Communities;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 271, of 29.10.2005.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1)      	The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)      	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Dated:  May 18, 2009 | By:  _______________________
RALPH M. AMATO
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE of North Carolina v. Jonathan SINGLETON.

No. COA15-325.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 16, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Dismissed in part; No error in part.
LASSITER, ex rel. v. NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITALS, INCORPORATED, et al.

No. 330PA14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 5, 2015.

Charles F. Carpenter, Tracy K. Lischer, Durham, Sharron R. Edwards, Joseph T. Edwards, Greenville, for Lassiter, Keen, et al.

Richard L. Vanore, Norman F. Klick, Jr.Robert N. Young, Greensboro, for Daniel, Terry (M.D.), et al.

Linda L. Helms, G. Gray Wilson, Winston-Salem, for North Carolina Baptist Hospital, et al.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of August 2015 by Plaintiff to Substitute Counsel:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of August 2015."
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                               PROMISSORY NOTE



$300,000                                                 Eden Prairie, Minnesota
                                                         March 24, 1998


         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Woodroast Systems, Inc., promises
to pay to the order of Sheldon F. Jacobs, Medina, MN 55356, the principal sum of
Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000), together with interest on the unpaid
principal balance, from the date hereof until this Note is fully paid at the
rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. Interest shall be computed on the basis of
the actual number of days elapsed in a 360-day year and paid at the surrender of
this Note.

         THE TERM OF THIS NOTE, shall not exceed one year (1) from the date
hereof. All or any part of the balance of this Note may be repaid at any time
without penalty.

         THIS NOTE IS UNSECURED.



Address of the borrower:   Suite 145                  Woodroast Systems, Inc.
                           10250 Valley View Road     By: /s/ Ralph J. Guarino
                           Eden Prairie, MN 55344         ----------------------
                                                      Ralph J. Guarino



                                                      Sheldon F. Jacobs
                                                      By: /s/ Sheldon F. Jacobs
                                                          ----------------------
                                                      Lender
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eden Bioscience Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bradley S. Powell, President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  August 1, 2008

 

|   | /s/ Bradley S. Powell |
|--------|-----------------------|

|   | Bradley S. Powell |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

- 21 -

----
STATE v. Jaahkii Quran HARRIS.

No. 166P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2016.

John L. Wait, High Point, for Harris, Jaahkii Quran.

Rory Agan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

*93Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of May 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2016."
Exhibit 99.21

CONSENT OF ROBBERT BORST

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form
40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year
then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to,
and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



| | 1. | The technical report dated March 16, 2012, entitled Technical Report on the Pueblo Viejo Project, Sanchez Ramirez Province, Dominican Republic NI 43-101
Report (the Pueblo Viejo Report); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Pueblo Viejo Report and the Pueblo Viejo Mine, and the
properties described therein.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information
contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-138760, 333-151243, 333-151251 and 333-174376 on Form S-8 of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2012



/s/ Robbert BorstName: Robbert Borst, C. Eng.
STATE v. Rafael S. GONZALEZ.

No. 459P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of September 2007 by Defendant to Dismiss Unknown Criminal Numbers Found in D.O.C. Opus No. 0849993:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of March 2008."
STATE v. Reginald U. FULLARD.

No. 43P15-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

Reginald Fullard, Polkton, for Fullard, Reginald U.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of April 2015 by Defendant for Appeal Orders Entered in Case 43P15-1:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6659

LEONARD BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (1:07-cv-00445-GBL-TRJ)

Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 20, 2008

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonard Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Leonard Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
A.C.L. MORTGAGE SERVICES, L.L.C. d/b/a Kngs Financial Consulting, Plaintiff, v. RUNSKIPSHOP, L.L.C. and William W. Hardin, IV, Defendants.

No. COA15-249.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Feb. 2, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded.
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/654Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/654 of 21 April 2015 appointing the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for            the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2020         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/654                     

# of 21 April 2015

# appointing the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2020

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 240(2), first subparagraph,                           thereof,                        

Whereas the Secretary-General of the Council should be appointed for the period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2020,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN is hereby appointed Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for the period from                     1 July 2015 to 30 June 2020.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall be notified to Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN by the President of the Council.

It shall be published in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                     

Done at Luxembourg, 21 April 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

E. Rinkēvičs
PARNELL v. PARNELL.

No. COA07-844.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Guilford (03CVD1725).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Remanded.
Unassociated Document


     

    Dean
Garfinkel

     

    


    November
23, 2010

    
 

    Barry M.
Brookstein

    Compliance
Systems Corporation

    50 Glen
Street

    Suite
308

    Glen
Cove,   NY 11542

     

    Via: Hand
Delivery and email

     

    I hereby
terminate my employment and resign from the Board of Directors and all other
positions that I hold in Compliance Systems Corporation and each of its
subsidiaries effective upon the filing of the 8K today, November 23,
2010.

     

     

    Regards,

     

    /s/ Dean
Garfinkel

     

    Dean
Garfinkel
STATE v. Kelvin W. SELLARS.

No. 51P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Kelvin W. Sellars, Norlina, for Sellars, Kelvin W.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of February 2016 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."

ERVIN, J. recused.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 743 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to modify the individuals eligible for associate membership in the Military 

Order of the Purple Heart of the United States of America, Incorporated. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

S 743 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR 

2 ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN MILITARY 

3 ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART OF THE 

4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INCOR5 PORATED. 

6 Section 140503(b) of title 36, United States Code, 

7 is amended by inserting ‘‘, spouses, siblings,’’ after ‘‘par8 ents’’. 

Passed the Senate March 1, 2007. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Francisco Marquez MARTINEZ, Defendant.

No. COA15-483.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Jan. 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
IN RE H.M.

No. COA08-1073.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Pasquotank (08JT1, 08JT2).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2009 – JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky Khimichesky Kombinat v Council**

**(Case T-348/05 INTP)**

Procedure – Interpretation of a judgment

Procedure – Interpretation of a judgment – Conditions for admissibility of the application (Arts 231, second para., EC and 233, first para., EC; Rules of Procedure
of the Court of First Instance, Art. 129) (see paras 3-7)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for interpretation of the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 in Case T‐348/05. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

1.      Declares that the first point of the operative part of the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 in
Case T‐348/05 *JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky Khimichesky Kombinat* v *Council* is to be interpreted as meaning that Regulation (EC) No 945/2005 of 21 June 2005, amending Regulation (EC) No 658/2002, imposing
a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, and Regulation (EC) No 132/2001, imposing
a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in, inter alia, Ukraine, following a partial interim
review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, is annulled in so far as it concerns JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky Khimichesky
Kombinat;

2.     Orders JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky Khimichesky Kombinat, the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities
to bear their own costs;

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders that the original of this judgment be appended to the original of the judgment interpreted, in the margin of which reference shall be made to this judgment. |
STATE of North Carolina v. Reginald Underwood FULLARD.

No. 309P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 13, 2016.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Reginald Fullard, for Fullard, Reginald Underwood.

Karen A. Blum, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th of January 2016 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Forsyth County:

> *28"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of January 2016."