alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH YEAR END REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               1,246
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                           312
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,710
<PP&E>                                               2,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                         715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       5,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  374
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 4
<OTHER-SE>                                           4,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         5,504
<SALES>                                              1,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,036
<CGS>                                                  796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        302
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    302
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           302
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.07
        


</TABLE>
MADGE v. SAVANNAH-CHATHAM COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT et al.

No. S15A1076.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

June 15, 2015.

Maurice Luther King, Jr., The Law Offices of Maurice Luther King, Jr., Albany, for appellant.

Leamon R. Holliday, III, Andrew H. Dekle, Bouhan Falligant LLP, Savannah, for appellee.

**Opinion**

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

*Affirmed without opinion.*

All the Justices concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW146283] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW146283 from Gulf Exploration LLC for lands in Converse County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW146283 effective October 1, 2004, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

Pamela J. Lewis, 

Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 05-18454 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2371 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2371 of 26 November 2015 adopting a ninth update of the list of sites of Community            importance for the Boreal biogeographical region (notified under document C(2015) 8214) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2371                     

# of 26 November 2015

# adopting a ninth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Boreal biogeographical region

# *(notified under document C(2015) 8214)* (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2331 of 9 December 2016 adopting a tenth update of the list of sites of Community                                 importance for the Boreal biogeographical region (notified under document C(2016) 8184).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-11147

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KRISTINA MARIE SHEPPARD

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:07-CR-80-ALL

Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Kristina Marie Sheppard was convicted of one count

of making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and was sentenced

to serve 16 months in prison. Sheppard appeals her sentence. Under the

discretionary sentencing system established by UnitedStates v. Booker, 543 U.S.

220 (2005), district courts retain the duty to calculate properly and consider the

applicable sentencing range under the Sentencing Guidelines, along with the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 26, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-11147

2

sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), when fashioning a sentence.

United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 518-19 (5th Cir. 2005). When we review

a sentence, we typically consider whether the district court committed

significant procedural error at sentencing and, if not, whether the sentence

imposed is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586,

594, 597 (2007). Further, the district court’s sentencing decision is ultimately

reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Id. at 594.

Sheppard argues thatthe district court erred by adjusting her offense level

pursuantto U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2 based on its determination that Officer Kernell was

an official victim of the offense. Our examination of the record reveals no

significant procedural error and nothing unreasonable in Sheppard’s sentence.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:

National Science Board; Audit and Oversight Committee.

# DATE AND TIME:

September 14, 2005, 11 a.m.-12 noon (e.t.).

# PLACE:

National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Public Meeting Room 220.

      ( print page 53396)    

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

## Wednesday, September 14, 2005, Open Session.

### Open Session (11 a.m. to 12 noon)

Discussion of Draft Report of NSB examination of the NSF Merit Review System.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Michael P. Crosby, Executive Officer and NSB Office Director, (703) 292-7000,                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Michael P. Crosby, 

Executive Officer and NSB Office Director.

[FR Doc. 05-17948 Filed 9-6-05; 3:46 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. TORRIO SANDERS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 13-10434 D.C. No. 4:12-cr-00042-CW-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Claudia Wilken, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 12, 2014 San Francisco, California Before: SCHROEDER and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and CURIEL, District Judge.** The government appeals from the dismissal of an indictment charging Appellee Torrio Sanders as a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 

# FILED
SEP 18 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). After an extended colloquy with counsel that traced the history of the matter, the district court found there had been a constitutional violation. Under the appropriate lega l standard, the court made the requisite findings. There was no clear error. The appellee’s motion to expand record and/or request for judicial notice is denied as moot. AFFIRMED
.

2
In the Matter of A.P.H., Jr.

No. COA15-678.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Jan. 19, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
STATE v. PINEDA.

No. COA08-74.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CRS218404, 05CRS218408, 05CRS220405).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Larry Eugene ALLRED.

No. 542P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 2nd of October 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50088

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CLAUDIO VILLAREAL-RIVAS, also known as Claudio Villareal, also known as

Claud Rivas, also known as Claudio Vilharreal, also known as Claudio Villareal,

also known as Claudio Vilharreal

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-2171-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Claudio Villareal-Rivas has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Villareal-Rivas has not filed a response. Our independent

review ofthe record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-50088

2

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Anthony BALL.

No. 102P13-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Charles Anthony Ball, for Ball, Charles Anthony.

Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 29th of May 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Henderson County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-335-CV

IN RE JOHN WAYNE MASSINGALE RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is

of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: CAYCE, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 28, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 179 (Friday, September 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18465]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee No. 13883; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory (Committee No. 13883) 
meeting:

    Date amd Time: October 11-12, 2005, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1235, Stafford I 
Building, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Va 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. G. Wayne Van Citters, Director, Division of 
Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone (703) 292-4908.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of 
mutual interest and concern to the agencies.
    Agenda: To hear presentations of current programming by 
representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to 
astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas 
of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations 
for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for 
achieving them.

    Dated: September 13, 2005.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18465 Filed 9-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
BARRY, et al v. OCEAN ISLE PALMS, INC., et al.

No. 378A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Oct. 10, 2014.

C. Wes Flodges, II, Attorney at Law, for Caruso, John, et al.

Sarah R. Buzzard, Attorney at Law.

J. Nicholas Ellis, Attorney at Law, for Branch Banking and Trust Company, et al.

David Dreifus, Attorney at Law.

Jacob H. Wellman, Attorney at Law, for Powell, James, et al.

**Opinion**

The following Order was entered:

Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31(a) and (b)(2) and Rule 15(e)(2) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court on its own initiative hereby certifies for review prior to determination in the Court of Appeals *Barry, et al. v. Ocean Isle Palms, Inc., et al.,* COA14-873. The case shall be docketed in this Court as of the date of this order. Briefs of the respective parties that have been submitted to the Court of Appeals shall be considered by this Court. Any party may file a new brief in this Court consistent with the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.
First Amendment, dated October 3, 2010, to the Senior Advisor Agreement



 Exhibit 10.12 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 This First Amendment (this “Amendment”), dated
this 3rd day of October, 2010, amends that certain Senior Executive Employment Agreement dated July 30, 2004 (the “SEAA”), by and between Tyson Foods, Inc. (the “Company”), and Donald J. Tyson
(“Employee”) (the Company and Employee may be collectively referred to as the “Parties”). 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the SEAA, the Company agreed to provide for Employee’s reasonable personal use certain of the Company’s
real property and a boat at previously established rates (collectively, the “Benefits”); 
 WHEREAS, since the
date of the SEAA, the Company has sold or otherwise discontinued availability of the Benefits; and 
 WHEREAS, due to such
Benefits no longer being available to Employee, the Company and Employee now desire to amend the SEAA as provided in this Amendment to partially compensate Employee for the loss of the Benefits. 

NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals and covenants and agreements set forth herein, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

 1. The effective date of this Amendment is October 3, 2010. 

2. Paragraph 1 is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end of such paragraph: “On October 19, 2011, and on
each October 19 thereafter, assuming Employee is alive on such date, the Term of this Agreement shall be extended by one (1) year.” 
 3. Paragraph 4.a. of the SEAA is hereby stricken and replaced in its entirety as follows: 
 “Personal use of the Company-owned aircraft for up to two hundred (200) hours per year during the Term; provided, however, that Mr. Tyson’s personal use of the Company-owned aircraft
shall be approved pursuant to the Company’s then existing aircraft approval policy and shall not interfere with Company use of the Company-owned aircraft. If Mr. Tyson does not use all of such hours in a given year, he may use those unused
hours in future years during the Term. As part of such personal use, Mr. Tyson may designate such number of additional passengers on such Company-owned aircraft as seating permits, and Mr. Tyson need not be one of the passengers;”

 4. Unless otherwise expressly modified in this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the SEAA shall continue in full force
and effect. 
 5. This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Arkansas, without regard to principles of
conflict of laws. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above
written. 
  

			
	TYSON FOODS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Donnie Smith

	Name:	 	 Donnie Smith

	Title:	 	 Chief Executive Officer

	
	DONALD J. TYSON
	 /s/ Donald J. Tyson
ESTATE OF ELKINS v. ELECTRONIC MORTG. SYSTEMS.

No. COA08-376.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 6, 2009.

Certification Date January 26, 2009.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CVS6138).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

d1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147815

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147815

COA: 309341

Berrien CC: 2004

- 404680

- FC

EDWIN DANTREL MERIDY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 24, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the annual report of Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harry
      M. Neer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
      Harry M. Neer ___________________


Harry
      M.
      Neer,


Chief
      Executive Officer


June
      29,
      2005








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Rockport Healthcare Group, Inc. and will be retained by Rockport Healthcare
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jarvis Tereza MARSH.

No. COA15-631.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.