alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 71 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize certain disabled former 

prisoners of war to use Department of Defense commissary and exchange 

stores. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for Mr. INOUYE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize certain 

disabled former prisoners of war to use Department of 

Defense commissary and exchange stores. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORES 

4 BY CERTAIN DISABLED FORMER PRISONERS 

5 OF WAR. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 54 of title 10, United 

7 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1064 

8 the following new section: 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 71 IS 

1 ‘‘§ 1064a. Use of commissary and exchange stores by 

2 certain disabled former prisoners of war 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Under regulations prescribed by 

4 the Secretary of Defense, former prisoners of war de5 scribed in subsection (b) may use commissary and ex6 change stores. 

7 ‘‘(b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—Subsection (a) applies 

8 to any former prisoner of war who— 

9 ‘‘(1) separated from active duty in the armed 

10 forces under honorable conditions; and 

11 ‘‘(2) has a service-connected disability rated by 

12 the Secretary of Veterans Affairs at 30 percent or 

13 more. 

14 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

15 ‘‘(1) The term ‘former prisoner of war’ has the 

16 meaning given that term in section 101(32) of title 

17 38. 

18 ‘‘(2) The term ‘service-connected’ has the 

19 meaning given that term in section 101(16) of title 

20 38.’’. 

21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

22 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

23 after the item relating to section 1064 the following new 

24 item: 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
3 

•S 71 IS 

‘‘1064a. Use of commissary and exchange stores by certain disabled former prisoners of war.’’. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
In the MATTER OF J.W. and K.M.

No. 215P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Sydney Batch, Raleigh, for Morgan, Jessika.

Amanda Armstrong, for GAL.

Hanna Honeycutt, Newland, for Buncombe County DSS.

Dwayne Wilkins, for Wilkins, Dwayne.

Charles Morgan, Charlotte, for Morgan, Charles.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of June 2015 by Respondent (Mother) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40547

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GERARDO ROJO-MARTINEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-PO-1806-ALL

Before PRADO, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Gerardo Rojo-Martinez has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rojo-Martinez has not filed a response. Our independent

review ofthe record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 16, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3684 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3684

 To prohibit Federal funding of foreign travel by the Administrator of 
 the Environmental Protection Agency until the Agency conducts public 
  listening sessions on rulemaking targeting carbon dioxide emissions 
 from existing power plants in each of the 15 States with the highest 
          percentage of electricity generated by coal in 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2013

      Mrs. Capito (for herself, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. 
 Luetkemeyer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 
Transportation and Infrastructure, Agriculture, and Science, Space, and 
Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit Federal funding of foreign travel by the Administrator of 
 the Environmental Protection Agency until the Agency conducts public 
  listening sessions on rulemaking targeting carbon dioxide emissions 
 from existing power plants in each of the 15 States with the highest 
          percentage of electricity generated by coal in 2012.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Listen to Americans First Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. NO FOREIGN TRAVEL UNTIL PUBLIC LISTENING SESSIONS ARE CONDUCTED 
              IN STATES THAT RELY ON COAL.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be 
obligated or expended for any travel outside of the United States or 
its territories by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency until--
            (1) the Environmental Protection Agency conducts public 
        listening sessions on rulemaking targeting carbon dioxide 
        emissions from existing power plants in each of the 15 States 
        with the highest percentage of electricity generated by coal in 
        2012 (West Virginia, Kentucky, Wyoming, Indiana, Missouri, 
        North Dakota, Utah, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Colorado, 
        Kansas, Iowa, Montana, and Wisconsin); and
            (2) the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
        Agency certifies to the chairman and ranking member of the 
        Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of 
        Representatives and the chairman and ranking member of the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate that 
        the 15 public listening sessions described in paragraph (1) 
        have taken place.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued July 28 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00408
- CV

——————————— IN RE JOSEPH ANDRE D AVIS , Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Joseph Andre Davis, acting pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus regarding an underlying suit affecting the parent

- child relationship. 1 We deny the petition. We dismiss the motion to stay filed in conjunction with the petition as
moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justice s Jennings, Bland, and Brown.

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of J.A.D., a Child , cause number 2014

- 58410, pending in the 2 45th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Roy L. Moore presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                        2,041,415
<SECURITIES>                  0 
<RECEIVABLES>                 120,864
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,097,279
<PP&E>                        10,275,452
<DEPRECIATION>                (475,672)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                13,236,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         457,645
<BONDS>                       11,076,350
<COMMON>                      613,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   1,691,685
<OTHER-SE>                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  13,236,387
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              902,857
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              420,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            675,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (192,999)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (192,999)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                  (192,999)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
Amendment Letter to the Bristol-Myers Squibb Company License Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 July 29, 1999 
 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 

P.O. Box 4000 
 Princeton, New Jersey 08543-4000

 This letter sets forth the agreement of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“BMS”) and Seattle Genetics, Inc.
(“SGI”) to amend that certain License Agreement dated March 30, 1998 between BMS and SGI (the “Agreement”) as set forth herein. 
 For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Section 5.2(b) is hereby amended to add the following phrase at the beginning of Section 5.2(b): 
 “5.2(b) Except as set forth in subsections 5.2(i) and 5.2(j), ...” 

2. A new Section 5.2(i) relating to use of the peptidic linker technology is added to the Agreement, which shall read in its
entirety as follows: 
 “5.2(i) With respect to Products covered by Licensed Technology relating only to Patent
(Application), 062,366, at the rate of 2%.” 
 3. A new Section 5.2(j) relating to use of BR96 technology is added to
the Agreement, which shall read in its entirety as follows: 
 “5.2(j) With respect to Products covered by Licensed
Technology relating to the use of BR96 with any active agent other than doxorubicin, at the rate of 4%.” 
 4. BMS hereby
acknowledges and agrees that SGI has completed, to the satisfaction of BMS, all of the milestones set forth in Section 13.2 of the Agreement. 
 5. Table 5 of Exhibit A to the Agreement shall be amended to add the following U.S. Patent: 
  

							
	 Application Number
	  	 Patent Number
	  	 Descriptions
	  	 License Type

		  	5,773,435	  	Prodrugs for betalactamase	  	Exclusive








 6. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force
and effect. 
 BMS and SGI, intending to be legally bound, have caused this Amendment to be executed by their authorized
representatives below. 
  

			
	SEATTLE GENETICS, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ H. Perry Fell

	 Name:
	 	H. Perry Fell
	 Title:
	 	President


  

			
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:
	
	BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Charles Linzner

	Name:	 	Charles Linzner
	Title:	 	Vice President and Senior Counsel
		 	August 10, 1999


  
 -2-
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18152]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Availability of Changes to Advisory Circular 27-1B, Certification 
of Normal Category Rotorcraft, and Advisory Circular 29-2C, 
Certification of Transport Category Rotorcraft

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability of Advisory Circular (AC) changes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of changes to AC 27-1B, 
Certification of Normal Category Rotorcraft, and AC 29-2C, 
Certification of Transport Category Rotorcraft for AC paragraphs 27.351 
and AC 29.351B, Yawing Conditions. These AC paragraphs are final and 
replace the existing AC paragraphs dated 9/30/99. These AC paragraphs 
will be included in the upcoming Change 2 update.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy L. Jones, Regulations Group, 
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, Fort 
Worth, TX 76193-0111; telephone (817) 222-5359; fax (817) 222-5961; e-
mail: http:<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#527d7d2525257c1933263a2b7c1e7c183d3c3721121413137c151d04">//<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c7b7b7b22476d786475224022466362697f4c4a4d4d224b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces the availability of AC 
changes. You can get electronic copies of these changes from the FAA by 
logging on to http//www.faa.gov/aircraft/draft_docs/. If you do not 
have access to the Internet, you may request a copy by contacting the 
person named under the caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September 2, 2005.
David A. Downey,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05-18152 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

(2004/C 33 E/153)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1712/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(23 May 2003)

Subject:   Community funding of works and provision of rolling stock in Greece

Is the EU funding (whether directly or indirectly, through grants or loans, such as through the EIB) the building of Olympic sports facilities in Greece or the construction and completion of projects connected with facilitating the 2004 Olympic Games? If so, is the Commission satisfied with the progress made?

Is the EU funding (again directly or indirectly, through grants or loans) the provision of new rolling stock (for buses and trams) for public transport in Athens or other Greek cities? If so, should there not be a mention of this fact (for example in the form of information panels) on the vehicles purchased with Community part-financing?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(4 July 2003)

The Union is contributing to certain Olympic sports facilities via a loan made available by the European Investment Bank (EIB), in particular for the renovation of the Olympic Stadium in Maroussi and the press centre located nearby.

The Union is also contributing to the construction of various public transport facilities in the greater Athens area under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

The projects concerned areas follows (figures are the indicative ERDF contributions):

The purpose of these projects is to contribute to the modernisation and extension of infrastructure endowments in Greece. However, their timely completion could greatly facilitate the handling of the expected traffic increase related to the Olympic Games. The realisation of the projects in time for the Olympic Games is a priority for the Greek authorities.

Concerning the co-funding of the renewal of the Athens bus and trolley fleet, the normal requirements relating to information and publicity apply.

----
STATE of North Carolina v. James Timothy WATTS, Jr.

No. COA15-15.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
NO. 12-08-00317-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

MICHAEL R. TIMMONS, § APPEAL FROM THE 

APPELLANT

V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW

CARLA L. PHELPS AND IN

THE INTEREST OF K.D.T., § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

A MINOR CHILD

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Michael Timmons filed a notice of appeal on July 24, 2008 evidencing his intent

to appeal a default judgment entered in trial court cause number 02-3178-E in the County Court at

Law No. 2 of Smith County. 

On July 29, 2008, this court notified Timmons, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 37.2, that the information received in this appeal does not show the jurisdiction of this

court because it does not include a final judgment or other appealable order. Timmons was further

notified that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before August 28, 2008, the information

was amended to show the jurisdiction of this court. On August 20, 2008, Timmons furnished this

court with a copy of a default “Order Establishing the Parent-Child Relationship” signed on

August 13, 2003 by the judge of the 321st Judicial District Court of Smith County. 

A notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed, subject to

certain exceptions not applicable here. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Thus, to invoke this court’s

jurisdiction, Timmons’s notice of appeal from the August 13, 2003 order must have been filed on

or before September 12, 2003. Because it was not, we have no jurisdiction to review any alleged

error in the August 13, 2003 order. Consequently, although Timmons responded to the July 29,
2

2008 notice, he has not shown this court’s jurisdiction of this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c).

Opinion delivered September 3, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
Order entered March 17, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00757-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.W.M., JR., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-07-04168

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ March 12, 2020 unopposed motion for 

extension of time to file their reply brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER

the brief received by the Clerk of the Court March 10, 2020 filed as of the date of 

this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.1






 Exhibit 10.1


November 24, 2010


Marc L. Panoff


Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary


Neruologix, Inc.


One Bridge Plaza


Fort Lee, NJ 07024



Dear Mr. Panoff:



Reference is hereby made to the Employment Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2009 (the “Employment
Agreement”), by and between you and Neurologix, Inc. (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used herein but
not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to such terms in the Employment Agreement.



As you are aware, the Employment Period is scheduled to terminate on December 4, 2010. The Company desires to
extend the Employment Period on the terms and conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement. In connection
therewith, the Company is sending you this letter (this “Amendment”) in order to properly amend the Employment
Agreement, effective immediately, as follows:



1. The first recital of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:



"WHEREAS, this Employment Agreement amends and restates in its entirety that certain Employment Agreement between
the Executive and the Company dated as of December 4, 2007 (the “Original Agreement”);”



2. The second recital of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.



3. Section 1.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:



“Section 1.1 Employment Period. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement,
the Company shall employ the Executive for a period commencing on the date hereof and ending on December 4, 2011,
unless such employment shall be earlier terminated pursuant to Article III hereof (the “Employment Period”).”



4. Except as amended by the terms of this Amendment, all of your and the Company’s respective rights and
obligations under the Employment Agreement shall be deemed preserved by this Amendment, without modification or
reduction.



5. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed pursuant to, the laws of the State of New York applicable to
agreements made and to be performed wholly within such State.



6. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original
instrument, but all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement. This Amendment may be executed by, and
become effective upon, the delivery by facsimile or e-mail (in .pdf format) of copies of the signatures of the parties
hereto.


 


3








 





Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing by signing below.



Very truly yours,


NEUROLOGIX, INC.


By:  /s/ Martin J. Kaplitt     

          Martin J. Kaplitt, MD

          Chairman of the Board



By: /s/ Clark A. Johnson     

          Clark A. Johnson

          President and Chief Executive Officer




ACCEPTED AND AGREED:



/s/ Marc L. Panoff     

          Marc L. Panoff



 


4
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT II

                     UNIVERSAL AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months Ended June 30,      Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                       ---------------------------     ---------------------------
                                                          1999            1998            1999            1998
                                                       ----------      -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                                    <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Net income (loss)                                      $  392,159      $   349,539     $  (192,995)    $   391,671
                                                       ==========      ===========     ===========     ===========
Weighted average common shares outstanding              6,784,810        6,769,425       6,778,229       6,769,425
                                                       ==========      ===========     ===========     ===========
Basic net income (loss) per common share               $     0.06      $      0.05     $     (0.03)    $      0.06
                                                       ==========      ===========     ===========     ===========


DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Net income (loss)                                      $  392,159      $   349,539     $  (192,995)    $   391,671
                                                       ==========      ===========     ===========     ===========
Weighted average common shares outstanding              6,784,810        6,769,425       6,778,229       6,769,425
Options and warrants assumed to be common stock
        equivalents using treasury stock method           356,398            1,780               0           2,434
                                                       ----------      -----------     -----------     -----------

Weighted average common shares outstanding, as
        adjusted                                        7,141,208        6,771,205       6,778,229       6,771,859
                                                       ==========      ===========     ===========     ===========
Diluted net income (loss) per common share             $     0.05      $      0.05     $     (0.03)    $      0.06
                                                       ==========      ===========     ===========     ===========
</TABLE>


                                       12