alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-433-CR

ANTHONY D. WASHINGTON	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Anthony D. Washington appeals his twelve-year sentence for robbery.2  We affirm.

	In an open plea to the trial court, appellant pleaded guilty to robbery.  After hearing evidence and argument, the trial court sentenced appellant to twelve years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.   

	In his sole point on appeal, appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing him to twelve years’ confinement because the sentence was disproportionate to the crime committed.  

	Although appellant timely filed a motion for new trial, he has failed to preserve his complaint because the record does not indicate that he presented his motion for new trial to the trial court.3  The term “present” means the record must show that the movant for a new trial sustained the burden of actually delivering the motion for new trial to the attention or actual notice of the trial court.4  Here, the record establishes that Appellant timely filed his motion for new trial, but it does not show that he actually delivered it to the trial court or otherwise brought it to the trial court’s attention.5  Accordingly, because appellant did not preserve his claim regarding the alleged disproportionate sentencing, we overrule his sole point.  The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

PUBLISH

DELIVERED:  August 29, 2008
STATE v. Clyde Gary WHISENANT.

No. 423P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Katherine Jane Allen, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Whisenant, Clyde Gary.

G. Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, for Whisenant, Clyde Gary.

David Learner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of January 2016 by Defendant to Dismiss Petition for Discretionary Review:

> *739"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."

ERVIN, J., recused.
Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Titan Technologies,
      Inc.
      (the "Company") for the period ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, the
      undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





a)
                The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
                or 15
                (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
                and





b)
                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations the
                Company.








Dated
      December 21, 2006




/s/
      Ronald L.
      Wilder, President


Ronald
      L. Wilder,
      President


(Chief
      Executive
      Officer)


(Chief
      Financial
      Officer)
<PAGE>   1





EXHIBIT II
----------

                     UNIVERSAL AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                                  Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                  ----------------------------

                                                     1999             1998
                                                     ----             ----
BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE 

Net Income (Loss)                                 $ (585,153)      $   42,132
                                                  ----------       ----------
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding         6,771,647        6,769,425
                                                  ----------       ----------

Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share          $    (0.09)      $     0.01
                                                  ==========       ==========

DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Net Income (Loss)                                 $ (585,153)      $   42,132
                                                  ----------       ----------
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding         6,771,647        6,769,425

Options and warrants assumed to be 
   Common Stock equivalents using 
   Treasury Stock Method                                   0            3,087
                                                  ----------       ----------

Weighted average common shares 
   outstanding, as adjusted                        6,771,647        6,772,512
                                                  ----------       ----------
Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Common Share        $    (0.09)      $     0.01
                                                  ==========       ==========


                                       11
# C_2011331EN.01001601.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-352/05) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Specific measures for certain agricultural products in favour of the minor islands of the Aegean Sea - Fruit and vegetables - Raw tobacco - Goat and sheepmeat - Non-compliance with the payment deadlines - Proportionality - Increase in the flat-rate correction for recurrent weaknesses)

2011/C 331/27

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented initially by: G. Kanellopoulos and S. Charitaki, later by: I Chalkias and S. Papaïoannou, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and L. Visaggio, Agents, assisted by N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision 2005/579/EC of 20 July 2005 disallowing from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section (OJ 2005 L 199, p. 84) in so far as it excludes certain expenditure carried out by the Hellenic Republic in the context of Specific measures for certain agricultural products in favour of the minor islands of the Aegean Sea and in the fruit and vegetables, raw tobacco and goat and sheepmeat sectors.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.

1

---
Exhibit 10.13

                                 ASPA GOLD CORP.
                 (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RENAISSANCE BIOENERGY INC.)
                              SHAREHOLDER AGREEMENT

The undersigned  shareholder  ("Shareholder") of ASPA Gold Corp. (formerly known
as Renaissance BioEnergy Inc.), a Nevada corporation  ("Company"),  for good and
valuable consideration and intending to be legally bound hereby, enters into the
following agreement for the benefit of the Company and all other shareholders of
the Company who enter into  substantially  similar agreements during the term of
this Agreement.

     1.   Shareholder has acquired  53,000,000 (Fifty three million)  restricted
          shares of common  stock,  US$0.00001  par value,  of the Company  (the
          "Restricted  Shares").  Shareholder  hereby  agrees  that,  during the
          period from the date hereof until  November 24, 2012 (the  "Restricted
          Period"),   Shareholder  will  not  sell,  alienate,  pledge,  assign,
          transfer, convey or in any way encumber any of the Restricted Shares.

     2.   For a period  of 2 (Two)  years  following  the end of the  Restricted
          Period, Shareholder will not sell, alienate, pledge, assign, transfer,
          convey or in any way encumber more than 2,000,000 (Two million) shares
          of the Restricted Shares during any consecutive  period of 90 (ninety)
          days.

     3.   Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply to the  Restricted  Shares,  even after
          such  shares may have  become  free-trading  pursuant  to Rule 144, an
          effective SEC registration statement or some other cause.  Shareholder
          understands that the certificates for the Restricted Shares shall bear
          a  restrictive  legend and that stop  transfer  instructions  shall be
          issued to the Company's Transfer Agent.

     4.   The Company and each other holder of restricted  shares of the Company
          who executes and delivers a substantially similar agreement shall each
          be third party beneficiaries of this Agreement and shall have standing
          to enforce this Agreement.

     5.   This Agreement  shall be governed by and construed in accordance  with
          the  laws  of  the  State  of  Nevada  (other  than   conflict-of-laws
          principles).  Shareholder  hereby consents to the  jurisdiction of the
          State and Federal  courts  sitting in Clark  County,  Nevada,  for all
          cases and  controversies  arising from this Agreement and acknowledges
          that said courts are not "inconvenient forums."
<PAGE>
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  Shareholder has executed and delivered this Agreement as of
the day and year set forth below.

NORTH AMERICAN GOLD & MINERALS FUND,
A Nevada corporation


By /s/ Ronald Yadin Lowenthal
  ---------------------------------
RONALD YADIN LOWENTHAL
Date: November 24, 2010
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, David Anastasi, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 14, 2003



/s/    DAVID P.
ANASTASIDavid P. AnastasiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
exv4w1






Exhibit 4.1








	RN RIGNET, INC. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE This Certifies that SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 766582 10 0
is the record holder of FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF
transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.
Dated: COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC (New York, NY) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
Exhibit 99.19
 CONSENT OF B. T. HENNESSEY
   1.
    
    The technical report dated February 13, 2009 entitled An Updated
Technical Report on the Mineral Reserves of Minera Alumbrera Ltd.,
Catamarca, Argentina (the Alumbrera Report); and2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection
with information relating to the Alumbrera Report and the Alumbrera
Mine, and the properties described therein.
  /s/ B. Terrence HennesseyName:
    
    B. Terrence Hennessey, P. Geo.Micon International Limited
STATE v. William Joseph MOORE.

No. 460A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

William F.W. Massengale, Chapel Hill, for Moore.

Joan Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of February 2008 by Defendant for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Dismissed as Moot by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
STATE of North Carolina v. Shane Mason SEEK.

No. 616P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Mark Montgomery, Durham, for Seek.

Jane Rankin Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of December 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

I n the Matter of

SAUL GARY GRUBER :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2830 D isciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 132 DB 2021

(Supreme Court of New Jersey, D

- 147 September Term 2020)

Attorney Registration No. 55091

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM:



### AND NOW

, this 17 th 

### day of December

, 202 1

, having failed to respond to

a Notice and Order directing him to provide reasons against the imposition of

reciprocal discipline, Saul Gary Gruber is suspended from the practice of law

for six months, consistent with the Order of the Supreme Court of New

Je rsey dated August 19, 2021 . He shall comply with all of the provisions of

Pa.R.D.E. 217.
Exhibit 99.15

CONSENT OF GUILLERMO PAREJA

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the
AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



|1. | The technical report dated March 21, 2011, entitled Goldcorp Inc., Peñasquito Polymetallic Project, Zacatecas State, Mexico NI 43-101 Technical
Report (the Peñasquito Report); and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Peñasquito Report and the Peñasquito Mine, and
the properties described therein.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information
contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376 and 333-181116 on Form S-8 of the Company.



|                    |  |                                
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: March 1, 2013 |  |                                
|                    | 
|                    |  | /s/ Guillermo Pareja           
|                    |  | Name: Guillermo Pareja, P. Geo.
STATE v. MACKEY.

No. COA07-1086.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Pitt (04CRS62798).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
SUGAR MOUNTAIN SKI RESORT, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, Petitioner, v. VILLAGE OF SUGAR MOUNTAIN, a North Carolina municipal corporation, and Round Boys, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, Respondents.

No. COA15-544.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 1, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 7 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 7

 To amend title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 and other laws 
   and provisions and urge Congress to make college more affordable 
  through increased Federal Pell Grants and providing more favorable 
       student loans and other benefits, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Clinton, Ms. 
  Mikulski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Akaka, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. 
Bingaman, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Levin, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Webb, 
 Mr. Menendez, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Reed, Mr. Dodd, and Mrs. 
Boxer) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
       to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 and other laws 
   and provisions and urge Congress to make college more affordable 
  through increased Federal Pell Grants and providing more favorable 
       student loans and other benefits, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``College Opportunity Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that the Congress should enact, and the 
President should sign, legislation to amend title IV of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 and other laws and provisions to make college 
more affordable through increased Federal Pell Grants and providing 
more favorable student loans and other benefits.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4350

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY FEURTADO, a/k/a Anthony Greene, a/k/a Ginzo, a/k/a

Gap, a/k/a Pretty Tony, a/k/a Tony Feurtado, a/k/a Anthony

Lamar Brown, a/k/a Anthony Paul,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (3:96-cr-00325-SB-1)

Submitted: July 17, 2008 Decided: August 28, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Feurtado, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Feurtado, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s amended criminal judgment sentencing him to 210

months of imprisonment. We conclude that Feurtado’s notice of

appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal in a criminal case must be

filed within ten days of the entry of judgment being appealed.

Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1). The district court, upon a finding of

excusable neglect or good cause, may extend the time period for

filing a notice of appeal an additional thirty days. Fed. R. App.

P. 4(b)(4). The appeal periods established by Rule 4 are mandatory

and jurisdictional. Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257,

264 (1978); United States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 197 (4th Cir.

1991). Feurtado’s amended criminal judgment, correcting a clerical

error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36, was entered on December 12, 2007.

He did not file a notice of appeal until, at the earliest, March

18, 2008, outside both the ten-day appeal and thirty-day excusable

neglect periods. Thus, Feurtado’s appeal is untimely.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and

deny as moot Feurtado’s numerous pending motions.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

 DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 31, 2000 and the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the Year Ended January 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         454,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,006,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 23,785,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,787,000
<PP&E>                                      68,999,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (31,109,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              83,033,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,661,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,573,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                83,033,000
<SALES>                                    143,419,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           143,419,000
<CGS>                                       45,516,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               99,231,000<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             469,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,797,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,819,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,819,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
<FN>
<F1>Provision for doubtful accounts and inventory provision included in total
costs.
</FN>


</TABLE>