alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Bernard George LAMP, Jr.

No. 222A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 16, 2015.

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Lamp, Bernard George (Jr.).

Kathleen M. Joyce, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Lamp, Bernard George (Jr.).

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Sarah M. Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

G. Glenn Gerding, Durham, Attorney at Law, for Lamp, Bernard George (Jr.).

Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of December 2015 by Defendant to Allow Substitution of Appellate Counsel:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of December 2015."
ESTATE OF TIPTON v. HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 247P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Laura E. Conner, Raleigh, for Tipton, Robert Eugene (Jr.) (The Estate of), et al.

Mel J. Garofalo, Charlotte, for Karpovich, Jeffrey A.

J. Douglas Grimes, Charlotte.

C. Rob Wilson, Charlotte.

John E. Spainhour, Asheville, for Qubein, Michael.

Clint S. Morse, Greensboro, for Delta Sima Phi Fraternity, Inc.

Walter C. Holton, Jr., for Jefferson, Marshall.

Michael C. Osborne, for Delta Sima Phi Fraternity, Inc.

Zachary Young.

Douglas E. Fierberg, for Tipton, Robert Eugene (Jr.) (The Estate of), et al.

Douglas C. Melcher, for Tipton, Robert Eugene (Jr.) (The Estate of), et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of July 2015 by Douglas C. Melcher for Admission Pro Hac Vice:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

MARTIN, C.J., recused.
DAWES v. AUTUMN CARE OF MARSHVILLE.

No. COA08-190.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 6, 2009.

Certification Date January 26, 2009.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 473729).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.
EXHIBIT 11**CONSENT OF T. DRIELICK**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following report and documents,which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statementon Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission: 1. The technical report dated July 31, 2006, entitled “Penasquito Feasibility Study: 100,000MTPD NI 43-101 Technical Report” (the “Penasquito Report”); and  2. The annual information form of the Company dated March 30, 2007, which includesreference to my name in connection with information relating to the Penasquito Report,and the properties described therein.March 30, 2007/s/ T. Drielick
J-A20026-18

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

DAVID TYRONE TRICE, JR.

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 333 WDA 2018

Appeal from the Order February 13, 2018

In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Criminal Division at

No(s): CP-02-SA-0002363-2017

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., LAZARUS, J., and MUSMANNO, J.

MEMORANDUM BY LAZARUS, J.: FILED AUGUST 3, 2018

David Trice appeals pro se from the order, entered in the Court of

Common Pleas of Allegheny County, following his summary convictions for

one count each of duties at stop sign,1 driving an unregistered vehicle,2

operating a vehicle without valid inspection,3 and evidence of emission

inspection.4 After careful review, we quash.

Trice was found guilty of the above-mentioned summary offenses and

ordered to pay a $150 fine, plus costs. Trice filed a summary appeal from

these convictions. Neither Trice nor his citing officer appeared for the de novo

____________________________________________

1 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3323(b).

2 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1301(a).

3 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 4703(a).

4 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 4706(c)(5).
J-A20026-18

- 2 -

hearing that was held on February 13, 2018. Accordingly, the trial court

dismissed the summary appeal and judgment was entered against Trice. See

Pa.R.Crim.P. 462(D). This timely pro se appeal follows. Trice has failed to adhere to the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See generally Pa.R.A.P. 2111; 2114-2119. Specifically, he fails

to provide this Court with a concrete issue to be reviewed and also fails to set

forth any argument, case law or other authority relevant to the entry of his

summary convictions. Due to the numerous defects in Trice’s brief, we are

prevented from conducting a meaningful review. See Pa.R.A.P. 2101 (briefs

shall conform in all material respect with requirements of appellate rules as

nearly as circumstances of particular case will admit; if defects in brief are

substantial, appeal may be quashed or dismissed); see also Commonwealth

v. Sanford, 445 A.2d 149 (Pa. Super. 1982) (when issues are not properly

raised and developed in briefs and when briefs are wholly inadequate to

present specific issues for review, our Court will not consider merits of case).

Thus, we quash the appeal.5

____________________________________________

5

In Commonwealth v. Rivera, 685 A.2d 1011 (Pa. Super. 1996), our Court

stated:

While this court is willing to liberally construe materials filed by a

pro se litigant, we note that appellant is not entitled to any

particular advantage because []he lacks legal training. As our

[S]upreme [C]ourt has explained, any layperson choosing to

represent [himself] in a legal proceeding must, to some
J-A20026-18

- 3 -

Appeal quashed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 8/3/2018

____________________________________________ reasonable extent, assume the risk that [his] lack of expertise and

legal training will prove [his] undoing.

Id. at 1013 (quoting O’Neill v. Checker Motors Corp., 567 A.2d 680, 682

(Pa. Super. 1989)).
YOUNG v. BAILEY, et al.

No. 355PA14-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Harvey L. Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for Young, Terri.

Harold L. Kennedy, III, Winston-Salem, for Young, Terri.

Sean F. Perrin, Charlotte, for Bailey, Daniel, et al.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of July 2015 by Plaintiff-Appellant to Consolidate and/or Stay:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
Exhibit 10.13
                                                                 -------------

             MYSTIC FINANCIAL, INC.
                RETIREMENT PLAN
                      FOR
             NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

                      Effective as of November 8, 2000


                                  AMENDMENT
                                  ---------

      Effective as of November 8, 2000, Section 1of the Plan shall be amended
to read in its entirety as follows:

            SECTION 1.  PURPOSE OF THE PLAN. The purpose of the Mystic
      Financial, Inc. Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the
      "Plan") is to provide a retirement benefit to directors of Mystic
      Financial, Inc. and Medford Co-operative Bank (collectively, the
      "Company") who are not employees of the Company or any affiliate
      thereof ("Eligible Directors") in order to reward their
      contributions to the successful growth and development of the
      Company and to ensure that the Company will have their continued
      service in the conduct of its affairs, particularly, in the event
      of a solicited or unsolicited takeover or merger of the Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the undersigned
officer of Mystic Financial, Inc. pursuant to authority given by resolution of
the Board of Directors.


                                       MYSTIC FINANCIAL, INC.


                                       By /s/ Ralph W. Dunham
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Name: Ralph W. Dunham
                                          Title: President and CEO


<PAGE>
# C_2023261EN.01004302.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/43

---

Action brought on 8 June 2023 — Tiendanimal v EUIPO (CRIADORES)

(Case T-314/23)

(2023/C 261/59)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Tiendanimal Comercio Electronico de Articulos para Mascotas, SL (Malaga, Spain) (represented by: T. González Martínez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative trade mark ‘CRIADORES’ — Application No 18 186 334

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2023 in Case R 798/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | allow the contested trade mark to proceed to registration in Classes 5 and 31. |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the contested trade mark to proceed to registration in Classes 5 and 31.

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), and of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
IN RE M.X.R.

No. COA08-1194.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 3, 2009.

Certification Date March 23, 2009.

Appeal from Harnett (06J230).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6155
HARVEY JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and MELISSA JONES, Plaintiff, versus MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections; WILLIAM D. CATOE, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-96-485-2-22AJ) Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Harvey Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Moore , No. CA-96- 485-2-22AJ (D.S.C. Jan. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                         <C>                   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                       9-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             497                       3,026
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       7,038
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,608                      39,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                           0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,560                      51,424
<PP&E>                                          46,535                      32,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 270,891                     173,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,432                      17,897
<BONDS>                                              0                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                           0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                           0
<COMMON>                                           478                         446
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,574                     103,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   270,891                     173,749
<SALES>                                              0                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,918                      83,818
<CGS>                                                0                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,694                      58,305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (399)                       (785)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,623                      26,298
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,112                      10,256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,511                      16,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                           0
<CHANGES>                                            0                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,511                      16,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51                         .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50                         .36 
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40186

Conference Calendar

 

JOHN WESLEY BANOS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CORETTA CALDWELL,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:96-CV-57

- - - - - - - - - -

August 15, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, AND DUHÉ, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

PER CURIAM:*

The magistrate judge improperly granted John Wesley Banos,

Texas prisoner # 545431, leave to proceed on appeal in forma

pauperis (IFP). Banos has at least three strikes, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g), which bars Banos from IFP status. See Banos v.

Garner, No. 96-CV-92 (E.D. Tex. May 22, 1996) (case dismissed as

frivolous; appeal dismissed for want of prosecution); Banos v.

Bush, No. 96-CV-219 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 3, 1996)(case dismissed as

frivolous; appeal dismissed for want of prosecution); Banos v.
No. 97-40186

-2-

Shaw, No. 93-CV-45 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 1993)(case dismissed as

frivolous; district court’s judgment was affirmed on appeal).

Nothing in the record indicates that the exception to the

statutory bar applies in this case. IT IS ORDERED that the

earlier order granting leave to proceed IFP is VACATED. Banos

has thirty days in which to pay the $105 filing fee. Failure to

make a timely payment will result in the dismissal of the appeal

for want of prosecution. See 5th Cir. R. 42.3.1.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED IF FULL FILING FEE NOT PAID.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, Publications (G13s).
    Date: February 25, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Hua-Chuan Sim, MD, Health Science Administrator, 
National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-1834 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 257/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 257/2013 of 20 March 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 257/2013                     

# of 20 March 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
**Exhibit 99.23****CONSENT OF M. HESTER**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following report and documents,which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statementon Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission: 1. The technical report dated March 31, 2006 entitled “Technical Report NI 43-101Los Filos Project, Mexico” (the “Los Filos Report”); and  2. The annual information form of the Company dated March 25, 2008, which includesreference to my name in connection with information relating to the Los Filos Report,the Marlin Mine and the properties described therein.Date: March 28, 2008         /s/ Michael G. Hester   Name:  Michael G. Hester   Title:  Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AMB
PROPERTY, L.P.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                        $137,019
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $91,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              $228,098
<PP&E>                                      $3,249,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                $103,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $3,621,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          $89,371
<BONDS>                                     $1,270,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    $1,983,549
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $3,621,550
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $448,183
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $289,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $88,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $158,851
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $139,237
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                ($2,490)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $190,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.94


</TABLE>