alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25

GRACE
                                          Paul J. Norris
                                          Chairman, President & Chief Executive
                                          Officer


                                          W. R. Grace & Co.
                                          7500 Grace Drive
                                          Columbia, MD  21044

                                          Voice: (410) 531-4406
                                          Fax:   (410) 531-4414
                                          email: paul.j.norris@grace.com

September 13, 2002


To:

                            PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

Dear :

In order to continue Grace's successful operating performance in the Chapter 11
environment, it is important to retain key employees by providing compensation
programs that are valued and compete with our industry peers. Therefore, Grace
has proposed, and the Court has approved, a special retention program for
selected key employees.

I am pleased to inform you that you have been selected to participate in this
retention program for 2003. The total amount of your retention payment will be [
]% of your base earnings. You will receive payment in one lump sum installment
on December 26, 2003 (based on earnings from January 1 - December 31, 2003). The
terms applicable to the supplemental payments are more specifically described in
the attachment to this letter.

I realize that cash is not the only reason why an employee should stay with an
organization. At Grace, you should expect to continue to receive opportunities
to experience personal growth, to upgrade your skills, and to engage in
challenging, satisfying work.

Your commitment to Grace's Vision and Values is appreciated.  Thanks.

Sincerely,



Paul J. Norris
In the Matter of N.T.

No. 119PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 2, 2015.

W. Michael Spivey, Rocky Mount, for Townsend, James.

Roger A. Askew, for Wake County Human Services.

Shannon Hoff, Charlotte, for GAL.

Claire H. Duff, for Wake County Human Services.

John Michael Durnovich, Charlotte, for GAL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of December 2015 by Guardian ad Litem to Substitute Counsel:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of December 2015."
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AVP, Inc. hereby
certifies, to such officers' knowledge, that this Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of AVP, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies, in
all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of AVP, Inc.

                                         By: /s/ Leonard Armato
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Leonard Armato
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                         By: /s/ Andrew Reif
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Andrew Reif
                                             Chief Financial Officer

November 15, 2005
STATE of North Carolina v. John W. HEARNE.

No. 411P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

John W. Hearne, for Hearne, John W.

Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Michael D. Waters, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th of December 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Vance County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 
30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000930406
<NAME> MVE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          2,548 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  32,631 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (989) 
<INVENTORY>                                    28,752 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               69,161       
<PP&E>                                         43,783      
<DEPRECIATION>                               (13,958)    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                177,698      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          36,526    
<BONDS>                                       141,680  
<COMMON>                                            1 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                    (6,129)       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  177,698         
<SALES>                                        47,491          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0          
<CGS>                                          33,834          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,773       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,211       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (131)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (196)      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    (196) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          ALL-AMERICAN SPORTPARK, INC.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB of All-American SportPark, Inc. for the quarter ending
September 30, 2007:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of All-
American SportPark, Inc.


Dated:  November 14, 2007



/s/ Ronald Boreta
Ronald Boreta
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and
Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to All-American SportPark, Inc.
and will be retained by All-American SportPark, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

        CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual Report of W. R. Grace &
Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"),
fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Paul J. Norris
------------------------------
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer

Date: March 13, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3(Nos. 333-86842, 333-68283 and 333-135210) and Form S-8 (No. 333-100214) of AMB Property, L.P. andForms S-8 (Nos. 333-42015, 333-78779 and 333-90042) of AMB Property Corporation of our report datedFebruary 28, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
STATE v. Felix Ricardo SALDIERNA.

No. 271P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 3, 2015.

W. Rob Heroy, Charlotte, for Saldierna, Felix.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd of August 2015 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd of August 2015."
----

(2004/C 65 E/286)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3194/03

by Säid El Khadraoui (PSE) to the Commission

(22 October 2003)

Subject:   Carcinogenic substance in baby food

Producers of baby food should replace the lids on their jars as quickly as possible. The lids contain low doses of semicarbazide (SEM), a substance that can cause cancer in mice, according to the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA). Research shows that a dose 40 000 times higher than a baby's daily intake can cause tumours in mice. According to the EFSA, the risk to babies is very small but, on the other hand, no research has ever been carried out on human beings. The problem also arises with some brands of fruit juice, jam, vegetables, mayonnaise and other foodstuffs packed in bottles and jars.

What is the Commission's view of the EFSA's research findings? How serious does it consider the risk to babies, children and adults to be?

What action does the Commission intend to take? Can the Commission say exactly what measures will be introduced and on what timescale?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(18 November 2003)

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is an independent authority with the task to provide the Community Institutions and Member States with scientific advice and technical support in the area food and feed safety. The risk assessment on semicarbazide (SEM) carried out by EFSA concludes that the risk to the consumer and babies in particular is very small but that it would be prudent to reduce exposure to SEM as swiftly as technological progress safely allows. The Commission is acting on this basis.

As soon as the Commission received the statements of EFSA concerning the safety assessment of foods and in particular baby foods in glass jars and bottles, it convened a meeting with the Member States within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, which took place on 14 October 2003.

At this meeting the phasing out of the use of the blowing agent azodicarbonamide as quickly as technically and legally possible was agreed. To this effect, the Commission will present a draft amendment of Directive 2002/72/EC (1) (the Plastics Directive) to the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health by the end of 2003.

At the request of the Commission, the Member States will continue to monitor the presence of SEM in packaged foods, in particular baby foods, and will report the results to the Commission for onward transmission to EFSA. On the basis of these results, a re-evaluation will be carried out if needed.

Furthermore, the Commission has asked EFSA to assess, with high priority, the risk of SEM levels currently reported in various food products and to complete the assessment of the risks posed by semicarbazide from various origins and in all types of food.

----

(1)  Commission Directive 2002/72/EC of 6 August 2002 relating to plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs, OJ L 220, 15.8.2002. Corrigendum, OJ L 39, 13.2.2003.

----
BURDICK v. BURDICK.

No. 556P07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Lloyd C. Smith, Jr., Windsor, for Mary Kate Burdick.

*437The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of February 2008 by Plaintiff to Reconsider Request for Writ of Certiorari and Grant Long Denied Parental Justice:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of March 2008."
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rennova Health, Inc.,
a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Seamus Lagan, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350), that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Seamus Lagan                                            | 
|----------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Seamus Lagan                                                | 
|Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer | 
|Dated:  May 22, 2017                                        |
In the Matter of: X.M.E.R.

No. COA15-141.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Sept. 15, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
# CE2004078EN.01044702.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/447 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/447

---

(2004/C 78 E/0469)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2996/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(14 October 2003)

Subject:   Standardisation of computer dates

Subject:

Will the Commission state whether there is any EU legislation that sets a standard format for dates in computer software?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(24 November 2003)

(24 November 2003)

The format for dates in computer software has not been regulated by Community legislation.

However, in 1992 the European Committee For Standardization (1) has adopted ISO 8601 under the standard EN 28601 to end the traditional confusion involving periods, slashes, the order of the numbers, and other date formats formerly used throughout Europe.

1

---

(1)  http://www.cenorm.be/

1

---
NUMBER 13-14-00479-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS, RICHARD FREYMANN,

AND JUAN GONZALEZ

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion1 Per Curiam 

Relators, State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, and Juan Gonzalez, have filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable 

Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, 

Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators’ verified plea in abatement and to enter an 

order abating the suit for damages brought against relators by the real parties in interest, 

Ignacio Gonzalez Jr. and Gloria Gonzalez, until sixty days after they provide relators with 

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

a notice letter for their claim stating the specific, separate amounts for the claimed 

damages and attorney’s fees. See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154 (West, Westlaw 

through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw through 

2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original 

Proceedings). In addition, relators request that this Court issue immediate temporary 

relief staying respondent’s order denying the plea in abatement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.10 (“Temporary Relief”). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus 

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of mandamus should be 

denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard 

Freymann, and Nathan Burris, No. 13-14-00347-CV, 2014 WL _____ (Tex. App.—Corpus 

Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.), available at

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/case.aspx?cn=13-14-00348-CV. Accordingly, the Court 

DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary relief. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

2nd day of September, 2014.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51283

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MAURICIO JOEL IBARRA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:07-CR-4-4

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mauricio Joel Ibarra appeals his sentence following his guilty plea

conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. He argues that the

district court clearly erred in finding that he was not a minor participant under

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). Members of the conspiracy departed Ibarra’s apartment to

engage in the methamphetamine transaction leading to Ibarra’s arrest; Ibarra’s

actions during the transaction were consistent with that of a lookout; and a

search of Ibarra’s apartment revealed methamphetamine, digital scales,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51283

2

weapons, ledgers, and $142,897 in cash. The district court’s finding that Ibarra

was not a minor participant was plausible in light of the record as a whole and,

thus, not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193,

203-04 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11240

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SERGIO BALDERAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-205-2

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United

States. The Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded the case for

further consideration in light of Cuellar v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 1994 (2008).

Balderas v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 2901 (2008). Accordingly, we remand the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 15, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-11240

2

case to the District Court for the Northern District of Texas for further

proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

VACATED and REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF WISS & COMPANY, LLP

      We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 6, 2003 relating to the
consolidated  financial  statements and financial  statement schedules of Xechem
International,  Inc. for the year ended  December  31, 2002 in the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-3 (File No.  333-71742)  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on October 17, 2001 and  declared  effective  on March 28,
2001.

WISS & COMPANY, LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 14, 2004
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter W. Stott,Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
| /s/ Peter W.  Stott           |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Peter W. Stott                |
| Director, President and       |
| Chief Executive Officer       |
| Crown Pacific Partners,  L.P. |
| November 12,  2002            |

 

 

This certification is madesolely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any otherpurpose.

 

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Jose Jesus Garcia LOPEZ.

No. 95PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Counsel, Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Nora Henry Hargrove, for Lopez.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 655 S.E.2d 895.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of March 2008 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).