alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             714,226
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,186,244
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,377,225
<PP&E>                                           2,637,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,668,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,149,618
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        10,001,519
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,482,494)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,668,643
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   914,740  
<CGS>                                                    0        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      446,968  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   262,899  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (43,554) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    248,427  
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0        
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       248,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.06
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE BALANCE SHEET OF UBICS, INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS OF UBICS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 FILED AS A PART
OF THE ANNUAL REPORT (FORM 10-K) OF UBICS, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,790
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                       185
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,006
<PP&E>                                             159
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (33)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,132
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,549
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (71)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,187
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,880
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,880
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, David P. Anastasi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/ DAVID P. ANASTASI                                  
|David P. Anastasi President and Chief
Executive Officer

August 9, 2006
**Exhibit 99.7**

**CONSENT OF GIL LAWSON**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibitsthereto, of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the “Annual Report”), I, Gil Lawson, consent to the references to my name in connection with (including, as an expert or“qualified person”) the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto, including as to (i) my review and approval of all scientific and technical information relating to mineral reserves and mineral resources contained in theCompany’s management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “MD&A”) which is attached as Exhibit 99.2 to the Annual Report, and(ii) other than with respect to the Red Lake Mines, Peñasquito Mine, Cerro Negro Mine, Éléonore Mine and Pueblo Viejo Mine, my review and approval of all scientific and technical information contained in the Company’sannual information form for the year ended December 31, 2016 attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Annual Report. 

Ialso hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibits thereto into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126039,333-126040,333-151243,333-151251,333-174376,333-181116,333-188805,333-195816 and 333-213153 on FormS-8,No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company. 

Date: March 16, 2017
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 69 

To authorize appropriations for the Hollings Manufacturing Extension 

Partnership Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. KOHL (for himself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JANUARY 22, 2007 

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for the Hollings Manufacturing 

Extension Partnership Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

4 THE HOLLINGS MANUFACTURING EXTENSION 

5 PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. 

6 (a) AMOUNTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2008 THROUGH

7 2012.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the 

8 Secretary of Commerce for the Hollings Manufacturing 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

S 69 CDS

1 Extension Partnership Program of the National Institute 

2 of Standards and Technology— 

3 (1) $110,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; 

4 (2) $115,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; 

5 (3) $120,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; 

6 (4) $125,000,000 for fiscal year 2011; and 

7 (5) $130,000,000 for fiscal year 2012. 

8 (b) HOLLINGS MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PART9 NERSHIP PROGRAM DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

10 ‘‘Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership Pro11 gram’’ means the program of Hollings Manufacturing Ex12 tension Partnership carried out by the National Institute 

13 of Standards and Technology under section 26 of the Na14 tional Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 

15 U.S.C. 278l), as provided for in part 292 of title 15, Code 

16 of Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 174 (Friday, September 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2005-55]


Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of disposition of prior petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption, 
part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice 
contains the disposition of certain petitions previously received. The 
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and 
participation in, this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither 
publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information 
in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of any petition 
or its final disposition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lender (202) 267-8029 or John 
Linsenmeyer (202) 267-5174, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 2, 2005.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Disposition of Petitions

    Docket No.: FAA-2004-18676.
    Petitioner: Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
    Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 91.207(d)(4).
    Description of Disposition: Quest Diagnostics, Inc. petitioned to 
operate certain aircraft without testing the emergency locator 
transmitter (ELT) for the presence of a sufficient signal radiated from 
its antenna. The FAA determined that testing the ELT for the presence 
of a sufficient signal radiated from its antenna is necessary to ensure 
the ELT functions properly in case of an emergency. The FAA is aware of 
the potential conflict between 14 CFR 91.207(d)(4) and 47 CFR 87.197. 
We are researching avenues to enable operators to comply with both 
rules. We recommended shielding the ELT antenna during testing or 
suppressing the antenna from emitting a signal. The FAA denied the 
exemption petition.
    Denial of Exemption, 08/29/2005, Exemption No. 8615.
[FR Doc. 05-17909 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, David P. Anastasi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DAVID P. ANASTASI                                               
|David P. Anastasi President and Chief Executive Officer May 10, 2004
----

(2004/C 65 E/137)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2278/03

by Roger Helmer (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(9 July 2003)

Subject:   National citizenship

Does the Commission recall the words of Our Lord, to the effect that no man can serve two masters, since either he will love one and hate the other, or vice versa?

By what right do the EU institutions imagine that they can foist a new and additional ‘citizenship’ upon the citizens of EU Member States, who for the most part have not wanted or requested or consented to such an additional citizenship?

What mechanism is available for citizens of Member States to reject and repudiate this so-called ‘citizenship’, and to affirm that their citizenship, their identity and their loyalty remain wholly and undividedly invested in their own country?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(18 September 2003)

The Treaty on the European Union (Maastricht Treaty) — drafted by a Conference of representatives of Member States' governments and ratified by all the Member States in accordance with their constitutional rules — introduced a provision into the EC Treaty which runs as follows:

The Amsterdam Treaty — drafted and ratified in the same manner — added the following sentence to the first paragraph:

This provision was incorporated without substantial changes into Article I-8 of the draft Constitution prepared by the European Convention, which was composed to a very large degree of representatives of national parliaments and national governments.

----
Bruce Fletcher NELSON and Jan Nelson Macinnis v. STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION and Gwyn R. Parsons.

No. 313P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

R. Hayes Hofler, III, Durham, for Nelson, Bruce Fletcher, et al.

J. Dickson Phillips, III, Chapel Hill, Thomas Holderness, Charlotte, for State Employees Credit Union.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 21st of September 2015 by Defendant (State Employees Credit Union) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18272]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: New Orleans International 
Airport, New Orleans, LA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of EIS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that it is 
withdrawing its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS) to consider a proposed taxiway to runway conversion and a new air 
carrier runway at Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport, 
New Orleans, Louisiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce M. Porter, Environmental 
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest Regional Office, 
Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0640. Telephone (817) 222-5640.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA, after coordinating with the New 
Orleans Aviation Board, is withdrawing its notice of intent to prepare 
an EIS for a proposed taxiway to runway conversion and a new air 
carrier runway and its associated taxiways. The publication of this 
notice formally terminates the FAA's EIS study for Louis Armstrong New 
Orleans International Airport, New Orleans, Louisiana.

    Issued on: August 11, 2005.
Kelvin A. Solco,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 05-18272 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Thomas F. Adcox, Employee v. CLARKSON BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer and UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier.

No. 222P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

R. James Lore, Raleigh, for Adcox, Thomas F. (Employee).

Nicholas J. Dombalis, II, Raleigh, for Adcox, Thomas F. (Employee).

Kari L. Schultz, Wilmington, for Clarkson Brothers Construction Company, et al.

M. Duane Jones, Charlotte, for Clarkson Brothers Construction Company, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 1st of July 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of July 2015 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

BEASLEY, J. recused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,972,038
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         499,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               716,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  8,089,532
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,629,280
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,609,268
<LOANS>                                     27,572,913
<ALLOWANCE>                                    281,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,055,886
<DEPOSITS>                                  39,468,970
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            360,936
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,212,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,013,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              43,055,886
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,486,077
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              741,802
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                57,620
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,285,499
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,509,093
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,539,520
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,745,979
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  163,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               7,314
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,465,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                358,791
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     259,406
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   259,406
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.52
<LOANS-NON>                                     29,147
<LOANS-PAST>                                    40,222
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 20,625
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               252,174
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  165,534
<RECOVERIES>                                    31,502
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              281,142
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           281,142
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        146,208
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Eric Cornell WILSON.

No. 378P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

H. Dean Bowman, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Eric Cornell Wilson, for Wilson, Eric Cornell.

Ted Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th of November 2015 by Defendant in *486this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
STATE v. Christopher MOSBY.

No. 354P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Christopher Mosby, Brunswick, for Mosby, Christopher.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of October 2015 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."