Exhibit 99.1



|                                                                                                                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO  
ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM 
FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 
March16, 2017 
Suite 3400, 666 Burrard Street Vancouver,
British Columbia V6C 2X8



---

GOLDCORP INC.

ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM

FOR THE FINANCIAL
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|                                                           |  |          |     | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------- | --- | 
|DESCRIPTION                                                |  | PAGE NO. |    
|                                                           | 
|INTRODUCTORY NOTES                                         |  |          | 1   | 
|CORPORATE STRUCTURE                                        |  |          | 4   | 
|GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS                        |  |          | 5   | 
|RECENT DEVELOPMENTS                                        |  |          | 9   | 
|DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS                                |  |          | 10  | 
|Principal Products                                         |  |          | 10  | 
|Competitive Conditions                                     |  |          | 10  | 
|Operations                                                 |  |          | 10  | 
|Sustainability                                             |  |          | 11  | 
|Anti-bribery and Anti-corruption Policy                    |  |          | 17  | 
|TECHNICAL INFORMATION                                      |  |          | 17  | 
|RISK FACTORS                                               |  |          | 75  | 
|DIVIDENDS                                                  |  |          | 92  | 
|DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE                           |  |          | 92  | 
|RATINGS                                                    |  |          | 92  | 
|MARKET FOR SECURITIES                                      |  |          | 94  | 
|DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS                                     |  |          | 94  | 
|INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS |  |          | 103 | 
|TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR                               |  |          | 104 | 
|MATERIAL CONTRACTS                                         |  |          | 104 | 
|INTERESTS OF EXPERTS                                       |  |          | 104 | 
|AUDIT COMMITTEE                                            |  |          | 105 | 
|ADDITIONAL INFORMATION                                     |  |          | 107 | 
|SCHEDULE A TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE    |  |          | A-1 | 



---

INTRODUCTORY NOTES

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This
annual information form contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the United States Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the United
States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, or in releases made by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), all as may be amended from time to time, and forward looking information under the
provisions of applicable Canadian securities legislation, concerning the business, operations and financial performance and condition of Goldcorp Inc. (we, us, our or Goldcorp). Forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future price of gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc, the estimation of Mineral Reserves (as defined below) and Mineral Resources (as defined below), the realization of
Mineral Reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs of production, targeted cost reductions, capital expenditures, free cash flow, costs and timing of the development of new deposits, success of exploration
activities, permitting time lines, hedging practices, currency exchange rate fluctuations, requirements for additional capital, government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, timing and possible
outcome of pending litigation, title disputes or claims and limitations on insurance coverage. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as plans, expects, is expected,
budget, scheduled, estimates, forecasts, intends, anticipates, believes, or variations or comparable language of such words and phrases or statements that certain
actions, events or results may, could, would, should, might or will, occur or be achieved or the negative connotation thereof.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Such statements and information are based on numerous assumptions regarding present and future business strategies
and the environment in which we will operate in the future, including the price of gold, anticipated costs and ability to achieve goals. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from
those in the forward-looking statements include, among others, gold price volatility, discrepancies between actual and estimated production, Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources and metallurgical recoveries, mining operational and development
risks, litigation risks, regulatory restrictions (including environmental regulatory restrictions and liability), changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or change in the administration of laws,
policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in Canada, the United States and other jurisdictions in which we carry on business, or may carry on business in the future, delays,
suspensions or technical challenges associated with capital projects, higher prices for fuel, steel, power, labour and other consumables, currency fluctuations, the speculative nature of gold exploration, the global economic climate, dilution, share
price volatility, competition, loss of key employees, additional funding requirements and defective title to mineral claims or property. Although we believe our expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and have attempted to identify
important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or
intended.

Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual
results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: risks related to international operations, including economic and
political instability in foreign jurisdictions in which we operate; risks related to current global financial conditions; risks related to joint venture operations; actual results of current exploration activities; actual results of current
reclamation activities; environmental risks; conclusions of economic evaluations; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc; possible variations in ore reserves, grade or
recovery rates; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; mine development and operating risks; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays



---

in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities; risks related to the integration of acquisitions; risks related to indebtedness
and the service of such indebtedness, as well as those factors discussed in the section entitled Risk Factors in this annual information form. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual
results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this annual information form
are made as of the date of this annual information form and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. Except as otherwise indicated by us, these statements do not reflect the potential impact of any
non-recurring or other special items or of any disposition, monetization, merger, acquisition, other business combination or other transaction that may be announced or that may occur after the date hereof.
Forward-looking statements are provided for the purpose of providing information about managements current expectations and plans and allowing investors and others to get a better understanding of our operating environment. We do not intend or
undertake to publically update any forward-looking statements that are included in this annual information form, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

Cautionary Note to United States Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources

The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates contained in this annual information form have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of
Canadian securities laws, which differ from the requirements of United States securities laws and uses terms that are not recognized by the SEC. Canadian reporting requirements for disclosure of mineral properties are governed by the Canadian
Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101  Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101). The definitions used
in NI 43-101 are incorporated by reference from the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM)  Definition Standards adopted by CIM Council on May 10, 2014 (the
CIM Definition Standards). U.S. reporting requirements are governed by the SEC Industry Guide 7 (Industry Guide 7) under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These reporting standards have
similar goals in terms of conveying an appropriate level of confidence in the disclosures being reported, but embody different approaches and definitions. For example, the terms Mineral Reserve, Proven Mineral Reserve and
Probable Mineral Reserve are Canadian mining terms as defined in NI 43-101, and these definitions differ from the definitions in Industry Guide 7. Under Industry Guide 7 standards, a
final or bankable feasibility study is required to report reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority. Further, under Industry Guide 7, mineralization
may not be classified as a reserve unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made.

While the terms Mineral Resource, Measured Mineral Resource, Indicated Mineral Resource and Inferred Mineral
Resource are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101, these terms are not defined terms under Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration
statements filed with the SEC. United States readers are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. In addition, Inferred Mineral Resources have a great
amount of uncertainty as to their existence and their economic and legal feasibility. A significant amount of exploration must be completed in order to determine whether an Inferred Mineral Resource may be upgraded to a higher category. Under
Canadian regulations, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. United States readers are cautioned not to assume that all
or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of contained ounces in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations if such disclosure includes the grade or quality
and the quantity for each category of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute reserves by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without
reference to unit measures.



- 2 -



---

Accordingly, information contained in this annual information form containing descriptions of our mineral
deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Currency Presentation and Exchange Rate Information

This
annual information form contains references to United States dollars and Canadian dollars. All dollar amounts referenced, unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in United States dollars ($ or US$). Certain information in
this annual information form is presented in Canadian dollars (Canadian dollars or C$).

The high, low, average and closing
exchange rates for Canadian dollars in terms of the United States dollar for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, as quoted by the Bank of Canada, were as follows:



|            |  |                        |        |  |      |    |        |      |  |    |        | 
|----------- |  | ---------------------- | ------ |  | ---- | -- | ------ | ---- |  | -- | ------ | 
|            |  | Year ended December 31 |       
|            |  | 2016                   |        |  | 2015 |    |        | 2014 | 
|            |  |                        |       
|High        |  | C$                     | 1.2544 |  |      | C$ | 1.1728 |      |  | C$ | 1.1643 | 
|Low         |  | C$                     | 1.4589 |  |      | C$ | 1.3990 |      |  | C$ | 1.0614 | 
|Average (1) |  | C$                     | 1.3253 |  |      | C$ | 1.2787 |      |  | C$ | 1.1045 | 
|Closing     |  | C$                     | 1.3427 |  |      | C$ | 1.3840 |      |  | C$ | 1.1601 | 

(1) Calculated as an average of the daily noon rates for each period.

On March 15, 2017, the noon exchange rate for Canadian dollars in terms of the United States dollar, as quoted by the Bank of Canada, was US$1.00 =
C$1.3451.

Gold, Silver, Copper, Lead and Zinc Prices

The high, low, average and closing afternoon fixing gold and silver prices in United States dollars per troy ounce, as quoted by the London Bullion
Market Association, and the official cash settlement copper prices in United States dollars per pound, as quoted on the London Metals Exchange, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, were as follows:



|        |  |                        |       |  |        |   |       |        |  |  |        |  |  |      |       |  |      |   |       |      |  |  |        |  |  |      |      |  |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|------- |  | ---------------------- | ----- |  | ------ | - | ----- | ------ |  |  | ------ |  |  | ---- | ----- |  | ---- | - | ----- | ---- |  |  | ------ |  |  | ---- | ---- |  |  |  | ----- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|        |  | Year ended December 31 |      
|        |  | Gold                   |       |  | Silver |   |       | Copper | 
|        |  | 2016                   |       |  | 2015   |   |       | 2014   |  |  | 2016   |  |  | 2015 |       |  | 2014 |   |       | 2016 |  |  | 2015   |  |  | 2014 |     
|        |  |                        |       |  |        |   |       |        | 
|High    |  | $                      | 1,366 |  |        | $ | 1,296 |        |  |  | $1,385 |  |  | $    | 20.71 |  |      | $ | 18.23 |      |  |  | $22.05 |  |  | $    | 2.69 |  |  |  | $2.94 |  |  |  | $3.38 | 
|Low     |  | $                      | 1,077 |  |        | $ | 1,049 |        |  |  | $1,142 |  |  | $    | 13.58 |  |      | $ | 13.71 |      |  |  | $15.28 |  |  | $    | 1.96 |  |  |  | $2.05 |  |  |  | $2.86 | 
|Average |  | $                      | 1,251 |  |        | $ | 1,160 |        |  |  | $1,266 |  |  | $    | 17.14 |  |      | $ | 15.68 |      |  |  | $19.08 |  |  | $    | 2.21 |  |  |  | $2.48 |  |  |  | $3.11 | 
|Closing |  | $                      | 1,146 |  |        | $ | 1,060 |        |  |  | $1,206 |  |  | $    | 16.24 |  |      | $ | 13.82 |      |  |  | $15.97 |  |  | $    | 2.50 |  |  |  | $2.13 |  |  |  | $2.88 | 

The high, low, average and closing official cash settlement lead and zinc prices in United States dollars per pound, as
quoted on the London Metal Exchange, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, were as follows:



|        |  |                        |      |  |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  |  |      |      |  |      |   |      |  |  |   |      | 
|------- |  | ---------------------- | ---- |  | ---- | - | ---- | ---- |  | - | ---- |  |  | ---- | ---- |  | ---- | - | ---- |  |  | - | ---- | 
|        |  | Year ended December 31 |     
|        |  | Lead                   |      |  | Zinc |  
|        |  | 2016                   |      |  | 2015 |   |      | 2014 |  |   | 2016 |  |  | 2015 |      |  | 2014 |  
|        |  |                        |      |  |      |  
|High    |  | $                      | 1.12 |  |      | $ | 0.98 |      |  | $ | 1.03 |  |  | $    | 1.32 |  |      | $ | 1.10 |  |  | $ | 1.10 | 
|Low     |  | $                      | 0.72 |  |      | $ | 0.71 |      |  | $ | 0.82 |  |  | $    | 0.66 |  |      | $ | 0.67 |  |  | $ | 0.88 | 
|Average |  | $                      | 0.85 |  |      | $ | 0.81 |      |  | $ | 0.95 |  |  | $    | 0.95 |  |      | $ | 0.87 |  |  | $ | 0.98 | 
|Closing |  | $                      | 0.90 |  |      | $ | 0.82 |      |  | $ | 0.84 |  |  | $    | 1.16 |  |      | $ | 0.72 |  |  | $ | 0.98 | 



- 3 -



---

CORPORATE STRUCTURE

Goldcorp is a corporation governed by the Business Corporations Act(Ontario) following its amalgamation with Glamis Gold Ltd. on December 1,
2006.

Our head office is located at Suite 3400, Park Place, 666 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2X8 and our registered office is
located at Suite 2100, 40 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3C2.

The following chart illustrates our principal subsidiaries (collectively,
the Subsidiaries), together with the governing law of each company and the percentage of voting securities we beneficially own, control or direct, as well as our material properties as at December 31, 2016. In this annual
information form, except as otherwise required by the context, any reference to we, us, our or Goldcorp means, collectively, Goldcorp Inc. and the Subsidiaries.



LOGO



(1) Companies in Mexico require a minimum of two shareholders. All of these subsidiaries are wholly-owned,
directly or indirectly, by Goldcorp.

(2) See Recent Developments below.



- 4 -



---

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

We are a leading gold producer engaged in the operation, exploration, development, and acquisition of precious metal properties in Canada, the United
States, Mexico, and Central and South America. Our current sources of operating cash flows are primarily from the sale of gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc. As at December 31, 2016, our primary properties, in which we or our Subsidiaries hold
a direct interest, by jurisdiction, are as follows:

Canada



|                                                             |  |                |  |          |                   |  |                      |  |     | 
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------- |  | -------- | ----------------- |  | -------------------- |  | --- | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Name of Mine/Project                                         |  | Ownership      |  | Location |                   |  | Material    Property | 
|Red Lake gold mines (Red Lake
Mines)                       |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Ontario           |  |                      |  | Yes | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Éléonore gold mine (Éléonore Mine)                         |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Québec            |  |                      |  | Yes | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Porcupine gold mines (Porcupine Mine)                      |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Ontario           |  |                      |  | No  | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Musselwhite gold mine (Musselwhite Mine)                   |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Ontario           |  |                      |  | No  | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Coffee gold project (Coffee Project)                       |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Yukon             |  |                      |  | No  | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Borden gold project (Borden Project)                       |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Ontario           |  |                      |  | No  | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Latin America                                                |  |                |  |          |                   |  |                      |  |     | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Name of Mine/Project                                         |  | Ownership      |  | Location |                   |  | Material    Property | 
|Peñasquito gold-silver-lead-zinc mine
(Peñasquito Mine)    |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Mexico            |  |                      |  | Yes | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Los Filos gold-silver mine (Los Filos Mine)(1)             |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Mexico            |  |                      |  | No  | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Noche Buena gold-silver project (Noche Buena Project)      |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Mexico            |  |                      |  | No  | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Camino Rojo gold-silver project (Camino Rojo Project)      |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Mexico            |  |                      |  | No  | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Pueblo Viejo gold-silver-copper mine (Pueblo Viejo Mine)   |  | 40% interest   |  |          | DominicanRepublic |  |                      |  | Yes | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Cerro Negro gold-silver mine (Cerro Negro Mine)            |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Argentina         |  |                      |  | Yes | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Bajo de la Alumbrera gold-copper mine (Alumbrera Mine)     |  | 37.5% interest |  |          | Argentina         |  |                      |  | No  | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Marlin gold-silver mine (Marlin Mine)                      |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Guatemala         |  |                      |  | No  | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|Cerro Blanco gold-silver project (Cerro Blanco Project)(1) |  | 100% interest  |  |          | Guatemala         |  |                      |  | No  | 
|                                                             |  |                | 
|NuevaUnión gold-copper project (NuevaUnión Project)        |  | 50% interest   |  |          | Chile             |  |                      |  | No  | 

(1)    See Recent Developments below.



- 5 -



---

The following map illustrates our key operating mines and exploration and development assets, which are
located in Canada and Latin America.



LOGO



- 6 -



---

Three Year History

2014

On March 26, 2014, we sold 31,151,200 common shares of Primero Mining Corporation (Primero) pursuant to a bought
deal secondary offering for aggregate gross proceeds of C$224 million. We no longer hold any common shares of Primero.

On April 4, 2014,
we, along with our joint venture partner, Barrick Gold Corporation (Barrick), completed the sale of our respective interests in the Marigold Mine in Nevada to Silver Standard Resources Inc. As consideration, Goldcorp and Barrick
received $267 million in cash, after closing adjustments (Goldcorps share - $184 million). Marigold was a joint venture operation between us, as the operator and 66.7% partner, and Barrick, who was the 33.3% partner.

On May 1, 2014, Mr. Clement A. Pelletier was elected to our Board of Directors (the Board) and Mr. A. Dan Rovig
retired from the Board, leaving the number of directors at 10.

On June 9, 2014, we completed a public offering of $1.0 billion in
aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes, consisting of $550 million aggregate principal amount of 3.625% notes due June 9, 2021, and $450 million aggregate principal amount of 5.45% notes due June 9, 2044 (the
$1.0 Billion Senior Notes).

On July 25, 2014, first gold was produced at the Cerro Negro Mine, and on January 1, 2015,
we achieved commercial production at the Cerro Negro Mine.

On October 1, 2014, first gold was produced at the Éléonore Mine, and
on April 1, 2015, we achieved commercial production at the Éléonore Mine.

On November 24, 2014, we announced that the
Porcupine Mine signed a resource development agreement (the Resource Development Agreement) with four First Nation communities including the Mattagami First Nation, Wahgoshig First Nation, Matachewan First Nation and Flying
Post First Nation. Under the Resource Development Agreement, we recognize and respect Aboriginal rights and interests in the area of the Porcupine Mine operation and the four First Nation communities recognize and support our rights and interests in
the operation and future development of the Porcupine Mine. The Resource



- 7 -



---

Development Agreement includes provisions for training, employment, business and contracting opportunities along with a consultation framework for regulatory permitting. Scholarship and bursary
opportunities are also to be provided for the youth of Mattagami, Wahgoshig, Matachewan and Flying Post First Nations.

On December 1, 2014, we
signed a collaboration agreement (the Collaboration Agreement) with the Wabauskang First Nation (WFN), which became effective January 29, 2015. The Collaboration Agreement provides a framework for
strengthened collaboration in the development and operations of Red Lake Mines. Based on a series of community meetings, which generated broad support from both parties, the Collaboration Agreement outlines tangible benefits for WFN, including
skills training and employment, opportunities for business development and contracting, and a framework for issues resolution, regulatory permitting and our future financial contributions.

2015

On February 20, 2015, we completed the
sale of the Wharf gold mine in the United States to Coeur Mining, Inc. for total cash consideration of $99 million, after closing adjustments.

On March 12, 2015, we announced that our subsidiary, Minera Peñasquito, S.A. de C.V. (Minera Peñasquito), had
reached a definitive court approved settlement with the Cerro Gordo Ejido for the use of 600 hectares (approximately 1,483 acres) of surface land located within the confines of the proposed Peñasquito Mine site. Minera Peñasquito had
negotiated an agreement for the use of the land prior to construction of the mine; however, in 2009, the Cerro Gordo Ejido commenced an action against Minera Peñasquito in Mexicos agrarian courts challenging the land use agreement.
Following a series of legal proceedings, the agrarian courts ruled on June 18, 2013, that the land use agreement was null and ordered the land to be returned to the Cerro Gordo Ejido. The settlement reached between Minera Peñasquito and
the Cerro Gordo Ejido fully resolved the dispute. Concurrently, Minera Peñasquito and the Cerro Gordo Ejido entered into a new thirty year surface land use agreement on commercial terms for the 600 hectares.

On March 13, 2015, we acquired of all of the outstanding shares of Probe Mines Limited (Probe) for total consideration of
approximately C$434 million. Under the terms of the acquisition, each common share of Probe not already owned by us was exchanged for 0.1755 of a common share of Goldcorp (the Common Shares). In addition, Probe shareholders
also received an interest in a new exploration company (Probe Metals) containing Probes mineral properties in the Ring of Fire in Northern Ontario, as well as C$15 million in cash and certain other assets currently
owned by Probe. As of the date of this annual information form, we own 12,868,646 common shares of Probe Metals, representing approximately 13.9% of the issued and outstanding shares.

On April 30, 2015, the Board approved an increase in the number of directors from 10 to 11, and appointed Ms. Margot Franssen to the Board.
This appointment increased the representation of women on our Board to 27%, surpassing our target of 25% as a signatory of the Catalyst Accord.

On
June 2, 2015, we completed the sale of our 40% interest in the Dee/South Arturo project (the Dee/South Arturo Project) in Nevada to Premier Gold Mines Ltd. (Premier). As consideration, we received
$20 million in cash, a $17 million contribution reimbursement relating to our funding of the Dee/South Arturo Project from March 16, 2015 to the date of closing, and a further 5% interest in the Rahill-Bonanza project in Red Lake,
increasing our interest to 56%. Concurrent with the divestiture, we participated in a private placement and subscribed for common shares of Premier for total consideration of approximately C$12.5 million.

On June 11, 2015, we increased the amount available under our revolving credit facility from $2.0 billion to $3.0 billion (the
Credit Facility) and extended the term of the facility to June 10, 2020, under existing terms and conditions. We subsequently extended the term of the Credit Facility to June 22, 2021.



- 8 -



---

On June 30, 2015, we sold 58,051,692 common shares of Tahoe Resources Inc. (Tahoe)
by way of a bought deal secondary offering for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately C$998 million. We no longer hold any shares of Tahoe.

On November 24, 2015, we acquired New Gold Inc.s (New Gold) 30% interest in the El Morro deposit for total consideration
of $90 million in cash and a 4% gold stream on future gold production from the El Morro deposit, increasing our interest in the El Morro deposit to 100%. On the same date, we entered into an agreement with Teck Resources Limited
(Teck) to combine the El Morro deposit and Tecks Relincho deposit, which are located approximately 40 kilometres apart in the Huasco Province in the Atacama Region of Chile, into a single project and form the
NuevaUnión Project 50/50 joint venture.

On December 4, 2015, we announced that President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Charles A. Jeannes was to retire and Mr. David A. Garofalo, formerly President and Chief Executive Officer of HudBay Minerals Inc., would succeed Mr. Jeannes as our President and Chief Executive Officer and join our
Board.

2016

On February 29, 2016,
Mr. David A. Garofalo was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer, following the retirement of Mr. Charles A. Jeannes.

On March 9, 2016, Mr. Russell D. Ball was appointed as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development.

On April 28, 2016, Mr. David A. Garofalo was elected to our Board and Mr. John P. Bell, Mr. Douglas M. Holtby
and Mr. Charles A. Jeannes retired from our Board. Following the appointment and retirements, our Board was comprised of 9 members.

On
July 19, 2016, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Kaminak Gold Corporation (Kaminak) for total consideration of approximately C$530 million. Under the terms of the acquisition, each common share of Kaminak not
already owned by us was exchanged for 0.10896 of a Common Share. Kaminaks key asset is the 100%-owned Coffee Project, a structurally hosted hydrothermal gold deposit located approximately 130 kilometres south of the City of Dawson, Yukon. The
Coffee Project is a high-grade, open pit, heap leach mining project located in a top tier mining jurisdiction.

On September 19, 2016, we
announced that Mr. Charlie Sartain would be appointed to the Board effective January 1, 2017. Following his appointment, the Board is comprised of 10 members.

On December 16, 2016, we announced that our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer George Burns resigned from his position and Todd
White, formerly our Senior Vice President, Technical Services and Business Excellence, became our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer effective January 1, 2017.

Recent Developments

On January 4, 2017, we entered into an
agreement with Bluestone Resources Inc. (Bluestone) pursuant to which we agreed to sell our Cerro Blanco Project in Guatemala to Bluestone for consideration that includes a cash payment of $18 million, a 1.0% net smelter
returns royalty on the gold and silver produced at the Cerro Blanco Project, common shares of Bluestone representing 9.9% of the issued and outstanding share capital at closing, and a payment of $15 million within 6 months following the
commencement of commercial production at the Cerro Blanco Project. Closing of the transaction is expected to occur in the second quarter of 2017.

On January 11, 2017, we entered into an agreement with Leagold Mining Corporation (Leagold) pursuant to which we agreed to sell our
Los Filos Mine in Mexico to Leagold for estimated consideration of $438 million, consisting of $279 million in cash (subject to certain closing adjustments), $71 million in Leagold common shares, and retention of certain tax
receivables of approximately $88 million. The common shares issued to us as consideration are expected to represent approximately 25% of the issued and outstanding shares of Leagold following the closing of the transaction, which is expected to
occur in the first quarter of 2017.

On February 17, 2017, we acquired New Golds 4% gold stream on the El Morro deposit for cash
consideration of $65 million. The El Morro deposit is part of the NuevaUnión Project, our 50/50 joint venture with Teck Resources that combines the Relincho and El Morro deposits.



- 9 -



---

DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS

We are engaged in the operation, exploration, development, and acquisition of precious metal properties in Canada, the United States, Mexico, and
Central and South America. We continue to investigate and negotiate the acquisition of additional gold mining properties or interests in such properties. There is no assurance that any such investigations or negotiations will result in the
completion of an acquisition.

Principal Products

Our
principal product is gold doré with the refined gold bullion sold primarily in the London spot market. As a result, we are not dependent on a particular purchaser with regard to the sale of gold doré. In addition to gold, we also
produce silver, copper, lead and zinc primarily from concentrate produced at the Peñasquito Mine and Alumbrera Mine, which is sold to third party smelters and refineries.

Competitive Conditions

The precious metal mineral
exploration and mining business is a competitive business. We compete with numerous other companies and individuals in the search for and the acquisition of financially attractive precious metal mineral properties. Our ability to acquire precious
metal mineral properties in the future will depend not only on our ability to develop our present properties, but also on our ability to select and acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for precious metal development or mineral
exploration.

In addition, we also compete with our competitors over sourcing raw materials and supplies used in connection with our mining
operations, as well as for skilled experienced workers. See Risk Factors  Our failure to continue to source suppliers on reasonable commercial terms could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition and Risk Factors  Our inability to attract and retain highly skilled employees may adversely affect our business and future operations.

Operations

Raw Materials

We have (i) gold Mineral Reserves at the Red Lake Mines, the Porcupine Mine, the Musselwhite Mine, the Éléonore Mine, the Borden
Project and the Coffee Project; (ii) gold and silver Mineral Reserves at the Los Filos Mine, the Marlin Mine, the Cerro Negro Mine and the Camino Rojo Project; (iii) gold and copper Mineral Reserves at the Alumbrera Mine; (iv) gold,
copper and molybdenum Mineral Reserves at the NuevaUnión Project and the Alumbrera Mine; (iv) gold, silver and copper Mineral Reserves at the Pueblo Viejo Mine; and (v) gold, silver, lead and zinc Mineral Reserves at the
Peñasquito Mine.

Environmental Protection Requirements

Our mining, exploration and development activities are subject to various levels of federal, provincial, state and local laws and regulations relating
to the protection of the environment, including requirements for closure and reclamation of mining properties.

The total provision for reclamation
and closure cost obligations at December 31, 2016 was $622 million and was calculated using a discount rate of 4.1%. The undiscounted value of this liability is $1,786 million, calculated using an inflation rate assumption of 2.74%.
Reclamation expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $28 million. The $75 million recorded during the year ended December 31, 2015 in respect of our obligation to fund our 37.5% share of Alumbrera Mines
reclamation costs remains unchanged as at December 31, 2016.

See Environmental and Sustainability Policy below and the disclosure
regarding environmental matters under the respective descriptions of our material properties for further details regarding environmental matters.



- 10 -



---

Employees and Contractors

As at December 31, 2016, we had 8,712 employees and 6,550 contractors located worldwide, including at our mines currently in closure. These numbers
do not include employees and contractors at the Alumbrera Mine and the Pueblo Viejo Mine of which we own 37.5% and 40%, respectively, but are not the operator.

Generally, our management believes that labour relations at the majority of our locations are good. However, we did experience disruptions at our Cerro
Negro Mine and Peñasquito Mine during 2016. The issues at the Cerro Negro Mine resulted from significant workforce restructuring, which we expect is largely behind us. At the Peñasquito Mine, we believe that improvements in
communicating our contracting strategy with unions and the local communities and businesses will reduce the potential for similar situations as we enter into a significant investment period in 2017 that will utilize contract services.

There remains demand for highly skilled, experienced and diverse workers in our industry despite the ongoing volatility in the resource industry. See
Risk Factors  Our inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may adversely affect our business and future operations below.

Foreign Operations

We currently own or have an
interest in mining operations and projects in Mexico, Argentina, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala and Chile.Our operations are exposed to various levels of political, economic and other risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties
vary from country to country and include, but are not limited to: terrorism; hostage taking; military repression; expropriation; extreme fluctuations in currency exchange rates; high rates of inflation; labour unrest; the risks of war or civil
unrest; renegotiation or termination of existing concessions, licenses, permits and contracts; ability of governments to unilaterally alter agreements; surface land access issues; illegal mining; changes in taxation policies, laws and regulations;
restrictions on foreign exchange and repatriation; and changing political conditions, currency controls and governmental regulations that favour or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ
citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes in such foreign countries are beyond our control and may adversely affect our business. Future development and operations
may be affected in varying degrees by such factors as government regulations (or changes thereto) with respect to restrictions on production, export controls, import restrictions, such as restrictions applicable to, among other things, equipment,
services and supplies, taxes, expropriation of property, repatriation of profits, environmental legislation, land use, water use, surface land access, land claims of local people and mine safety. The effect of these factors cannot be accurately
predicted. See Risk Factors below.

Sustainability

In 2016, we reviewed and updated ourSustainability Excellence Management System (SEMS), an integrated management system
containing performance standards for safety and health, environment, corporate social responsibility and security. The SEMS, initially implemented in 2014, is integrated into our core business functions, and emphasizes sustainability, responsibility
and accountability at all organizational levels. Performance standards covering all activities that have the potential to affect the sustainability of our properties and the communities in which we operate are an integral part of the SEMS.

Four SEMS audits were conducted during 2016, one at each of the following sites, by teams that were independent of the operations being audited:
Cerro Negro, Éléonore, Musselwhite and Porcupine. The SEMS audits evaluated compliance with key regulatory and permit requirements, and compliance with the SEMS standards.



- 11 -



---

Safety Commitment

Our vision of making Goldcorp Safe Enough for Our Families is well understood by our employees and we continue to advance safety performance
across all regions of our operations and projects. At the end of 2016, we demonstrated improvement in our safety performance as measured by the frequency of reportable incidents. The All Injuries Frequency Rate (AIFR)
improved by 11% and the Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) improved by 4%. We experienced a fatality on April 14, 2016 at the Marlin Mine. On April 14, 2016, Jaime Otero Pérez López, an
underground miner helper, was killed by a rockfall while working near an open stope at our Marlin Mine in Guatemala. Operations at the mine were suspended and a thorough investigation was conducted to determine the cause of the accident. The
incident occurred as a result of a massive stope failure in a recently blasted stope. As a result of findings from the investigation, a focused follow-up of Ground Control Management Plans was completed in
2016 at all Goldcorp mine sites.

We will continue our focus in 2017 on the elimination of fatalities. We strive to improve our safety record and,
as a result of analyses, have put additional focus on several key areas, including: (a) increased management visibility in the field through employee engagements (planned interactions in the field between managers and employees); (b) improved
risk identification and communication across Goldcorp; (c) requiring all workers to carry and use the Golden Guide and adopting the 5-point safety card for all work assignments. The Golden
Guide is a work-planning tool to be used for all jobs, routine and non-routine, to assess the risks and control actions to be incorporated into the planning and the
5-point card has been in use for over 40 years in underground mining in Canada  it is a workplace risk assessment and hazard identification tool as well as a tool used to enrich a safety conversation in
the work area; and (d) improvement of emergency response capabilities for all locations.

In 2016, we advanced Leadership Engagement and
Accountability through leadership led training on standards and accountability. The program is called Step In and is centered on site leadership providing training to their direct reports, and this training is cascaded down to all workers on site.
The core of the training is defining and demonstrating the site standard for safe production and how to engage employees in safety. In addition, we improved our ground control systems, completed an overhaul of our safety and health standards, and
introduced new tools on incident investigation and communication.

Beginning in July 2015, we established targets and started to collect metrics on
employee engagements by managers and senior leaders at mine sites. In 2016, our site management completed over 316,000 employee engagements.

Our
continued focus in 2016 on Potential Fatal Occurrences (PFO) has helped to identify critical risk areas and allowed for sharing of learnings from incidents where no injury occurred. The lessons learned as a result of
the thorough investigations of PFOs were shared across Goldcorp to avoid the potential recurrence of similar incidents.

Another objective in 2016
was to continue to improve our occupational health systems through the introduction of a new data system and a standardized approach to conducting health risk assessments across standardized work assignments. This will enable us to consistently
track and compare occupational exposure data and controls across workgroups and over time.

On October 6, 2016, we observed our fourth annual
Day of Remembrance at each of our operating sites and corporate and regional offices. All operations, projects and offices stopped their normal activities that day to focus on lowering their risk tolerance, remembering employees who had
lost their lives at work and committing to apply the learnings from the day to reduce the risk of fatalities. The presentations were followed by activities at the various sites, where site employees, including the executive and senior management,
reviewed their workplaces and leaders shared their personal safety leadership plans. All employees were asked to develop their own personal safety plan and share it with their supervisors and place it in the Golden Guide. The personal safety plan
establishes an individuals personal commitment to themselves, their colleagues, and their family.



- 12 -



---

Starting in 2014, each member of our executive team sponsors a mine site or project for the following year.
The sponsorship commitment includes participation in the mine sites or projects Day of Remembrance, participating in the reviews of all PFOs at the mine site or project, and participating in quarterly Safety and Health reviews. The
program is now in its fourth year.

Occupational Health and Safety Policy

Our occupational health and safety policy (the Occupational Health and Safety Policy) is designed to ensure that we develop and implement effective management systems to identify, minimize and manage health and safety risks, promote and enhance employee commitment and accountability, provide training and
information, aim for continuous improvement by setting targets and measuring results, and provide the resources to achieve a safe and healthy work environment.The Occupational Health and Safety Policy is
available on our website at www.goldcorp.com.

Corporate Social Responsibility Policy

The main focus of our strategy is to build strong partnerships through active engagement and make positive contributions in the communities where we
operate. We strive to understand each communitys needs and to address their concerns, and conduct our business in a way that supports strong, vibrant and sustainable communities. Our community strategy is embedded in the SEMS standards. The
SEMS standards require each operation to understand the local social, cultural, economic, political and institutional context and create locally adapted engagement and impact management plans.

Our corporate social responsibility policy (the Corporate Social Responsibility Policy)
provides guidelines to develop meaningful and effective strategies for engaging with stakeholders, establish grievance mechanisms, identify socio-economic opportunities and make meaningful and
sustainable contributions to the communities where we operate.The Sustainability Committee of the Board is responsible for overseeing the Corporate Social Responsibility Policy. Information regarding
assessments and performance will be made available to the public through annual GRI (as defined below) reporting. The Corporate Social Responsibility Policy is available on our website at www.goldcorp.com in English, Spanish and French.

During 2016, we continued to implement components of our corporate social responsibility framework at all of our operating sites and
projects, including: socio-economic baseline studies, stakeholder mapping and prioritization and upgraded grievance mechanisms. In addition, some of our noteworthy corporate social responsibility activities and initiatives include:



| | ● |  | United Nations Global Compact(UN Global Compact)  The UN Global Compact is a strategic
policy initiative for businesses that are committed to aligning their operations and strategies with ten universally accepted principles in the areas of human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption. In 2009, we became a signatory to the UN
Global Compact.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ● |  | International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM)  The ICMM is a collaborative
organization comprised of mining and metals companies and associations working together on sustainability-related issues important to the mining industry, of which we are a member. The ICMM is a contributor to sustainable development and requires
members to perform based on principles of sustainable development.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ● |  | Global Reporting Initiative(GRI)  The GRI is intended to serve as a generally accepted
framework for reporting on an organizations economic, environmental, social and health and safety performance. The GRI Reporting Framework contains general and sector-specific content applicable for reporting an organizations
sustainability performance. We have committed to using the GRI as the basis for our sustainability reporting and have been reporting to and against the GRI since 2007. In 2016 we completed our transition to the G4 Sustainability Reporting
Guidelines. Under the G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, companies must focus their sustainability reporting on topics that are material to them and their stakeholders.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 13 -



---

| | ● |  | Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)  The EITI is a partnership of
governments, international organizations, companies, non-governmental organizations, investors and business and industrial organizations with the aim to strengthen governance by improving transparency in
transactions between governments and companies in the extractive industries. This transparency will in turn improve public awareness of the revenues from these industries, increasing the likelihood that they will contribute to sustainable
development and poverty reduction. We are an active supporter of the EITI through our membership in the ICMM and individual corporate action. In countries where governments have indicated a desire to be a part of the process, we are actively
involved in contributing to the success of the initiative.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ● |  | World Gold Councils Conflict-Free Gold Standard(CFGS)  Developed by the World
Gold Council with extensive input from gold producers, governments, civil society and supply chain participants, the CFGS establishes a common approach by which gold producers can assess and provide assurance that their gold has been extracted in a
manner that does not cause, support or benefit unlawful armed conflict or contribute to serious human rights abuses or breaches of international humanitarian law. The CFGS was published in October 2012 and is designed to apply to World Gold Council
member companies and other entities involved in the extraction of gold. We implemented the CFGS on a company-wide basis effective January 1, 2013 and publish our Conflict-Free Gold Report on an annual basis. Conformance with the CFGS is
company-wide and is externally assured. In 2016, we continued to focus our efforts on the Los Filos, Peñasquito and Marlin mines, sites that are considered to be located in higher-risk areas. In 2016, our assurance statement confirmed that
all gold and gold-bearing material produced at mining operations where we operate have the appropriate systems and controls in place to conform to the World Gold Councils Conflict-Free Gold Standard. The application of CFGS has also assisted
us in continuing to implement practices aligned with the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (as defined below).
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See also, Environmental and Sustainability Policy below.

Human Rights Policy

Our human rights policy (the
Human Rights Policy) requires the integration of human rights best practices into all of our business and decision-making processes. The Human Rights Policy mandates that we operate
in a way that respects the human rights of employees and of the members of the communities in which we operate. International humanitarian laws were consulted in developing the Human Rights Policy and it includes our pledge to seek to establish
constructive dialogues and partnerships with a variety of stakeholders on human rights performance.Our Human Rights Policy recognizes that while governments have the primary responsibility to protect human
rights, our activities have the potential to impact the human rights of individuals affected by our business operations. As such, the Human Rights Policy provides that we will seek constructive dialogues and partnerships with a variety of
stakeholders on our human rights performance, especially those impacted directly by our operations. In 2016, we implemented internal human rights training for employees.

The Human Rights Policy reflects the changing social context in which we operate and defines our
practices and commitments on human rights. Recent additions to this policy include clauses on community consultation; grievance mechanisms; commitment to the Conflict-Free Gold Standard; commitment to respect the rights, interests, perspectives, and
traditions of Indigenous Peoples; resettlement planning; and potential measures in the event of non-compliance.

The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (the Voluntary Principles) are a set of voluntary principles developed by the
governments of the United States and the United Kingdom, companies in the extractive and energy sectors and non-governmental organizations to guide companies in maintaining the safety and security of their
operations within an operating framework that ensures respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. In 2016, we formally became a signatory of the Voluntary Principles. As a signatory, we are
required to implement the principles across all of our



- 14 -



---

operations, and will improve our alignment of corporate policies and procedures with internationally recognized human rights principles in the
provision of security for our operations.

In 2016, we
performed assessments of the Voluntary Principles at several Latin American sites. In accordance with the Voluntary Principles, during 2016, all security staff received at least one pre-shift briefing per
month on the use of force and additional training on respecting human rights. Our security supervisors provided ongoing training and refresher classes. Non-compliance with our human rights requirements is not
tolerated.

The Sustainability Committee of the Board is responsible for overseeing the Human Rights
Policy. The Human Rights Policy is available on our website at www.goldcorp.com in English, Spanish and French.

Environmental and Sustainability
Policy

Under our environmental and sustainability policy (the Environmental and Sustainability Policy), we are dedicated
to the protection of life, health and the environment for present and future generations. Resources are focused to achieve shareholder value without neglecting our responsibility to sustainable development. The needs and culture of the local
communities will be respected. The Environmental and Sustainability Policy is available on our website at www.goldcorp.com.

In addition, and as
described above, we have implemented the SEMS, a performance-based framework and standards for safety and health, environment, corporate social responsibility and security.

Our properties are routinely inspected by staff representing the applicable regulatory authorities to ensure that such properties are in compliance with
applicable environmental laws and regulations. Our properties are also periodically audited by our employees or external staff to ensure that they are in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations as well as the SEMS standards.
The Sustainability Committee of the Board is responsible for overseeing the Environmental and Sustainability Policy.

As part of our goal to
minimize the impact from the environmental and social aspects of our projects and operations, we develop comprehensive closure and reclamation plans as part of our initial project planning and design. If we acquire a property that lacks a closure
plan, we require the preparation of a closure plan. As part of our annual strategic business planning we identify the significant environmental risks and review and update the total closure costs for each property to account for additional knowledge
acquired with respect to a property or for changes in applicable laws or regulations. This process ensures that we properly budget for the costs associated with implementing appropriate sustainability management measures.

In addition to the initiatives described above under Corporate Social Responsibility Policy, and consistent with the Environmental and
Sustainability Policy and the SEMS, an additional initiative of particular importance to us relating to the protection of the environment and sustainability is our participation in the International Cyanide Management Code (the Cyanide
Code). The Cyanide Code is a voluntary industry program for companies involved in the production of gold by the cyanidation process and focuses on the management of cyanide and cyanide solutions. The Cyanide Code addresses the production
of cyanide, its transport from the producer to the mine, its on-site storage and use, decommissioning and financial assurance, worker safety, emergency response, training, stakeholder involvement and
implementation verification. We became a signatory to the Cyanide Code in July 2007, and currently all of our operating mines are certified compliant with the Cyanide Code, with the exception of one of our newest operations, the
ÉléonoreMine which is planned for certification in 2017. In 2016, the Cerro Negro Mine was certified and we recertified each of the Musselwhite, Marlin, and Peñasquito mines.

Diversity Policy

Under our diversity policy (the
Diversity Policy), we recognize the benefits arising from employee and Board diversity, including a broader pool of high quality employees, improving employee retention,



- 15 -



---

accessing different perspectives and ideas and strengthening our corporate performance. The Diversity Policy promotes the benefits of, and need for, extending opportunities for career advancement
to all of our workforce and outside candidates, without distinction as to gender, ethnicity, or any other basis. The Diversity Policy is available on our website at www.goldcorp.com.

Diversity is any dimension that can be used to differentiate groups and people from one another and it means the respect for and
appreciation of the differences in gender, age, ethnic origin, religion, education, sexual orientation, political belief or disability. We respect and value the perspectives, experiences, cultures and essential differences that employees possess. In
addition, our commitment to the advancement of women in the workplace is embodied in the industry-leading Creating Choices Program and reflects our understanding that achievement and fulfillment of individuals career potential are
only made possible by the development and advancement opportunities, training and mentoring provided to all of our workforce.

We strive to foster
an open and inclusive workplace environment and strongly support the principle that all individuals should have an equal opportunity to participate in our company and achieve their full potential. In compliance with our Code of Conduct and the
Diversity Policy, directors, officers, employees and contractors will:



| | 1. | Always treat each other and all members of the outside community with respect and courtesy.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Always keep our workplace free from all forms of harassment, meaning unwelcome behaviour that a reasonable person would
consider to be degrading, humiliating, discriminatory or intimidating.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Never permit factors like race, religion, colour, sex, sexual orientation, age, nationality or ethnicity to determine
decisions about hiring, employment promotions, pay rates, transfers, layoffs or terminations (or condone decisions by others determined by such factors).
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Never permit physical disabilities to determine work-related decisions, unless the disability prevents a person from
safely doing a job and the disability cannot be reasonably accommodated.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notable achievements in 2016 include:

Diversity Committee: In 2016, the Vice President of Diversity continued work with our Diversity Committee, which comprised of a diverse group of
employees from a range of different Goldcorp offices and sites. The Diversity Committee raises awareness of diversity and inclusion across departments and focuses company efforts to enhance our inclusive workplace culture.

Unconscious Bias Awareness Training: In 2016, the entire management team in both Canada and Latin America, including Mine General Managers,
participated in Unconscious Bias training. This training raised awareness and deepened understanding of unconscious and conscious bias in the workplace, and provided strategies for disrupting and overcoming bias.

Diversity Survey: In September 2016, we engaged a third party supplier to survey a group of over 3,000 full time employees that were
representative of all of our sites and offices, on the specific subject of Diversity and Inclusion. The survey gathered voluntary and anonymous data on demographic indicators and employee sentiment to provide management with a snapshot of the
current state of Diversity and Inclusion in the company. The survey was well received and had a high response rate of over 70% and the feedback gathered will inform the growth of our diversity strategy in 2017.

Creating Choices: To ensure gender diversity throughout our organization, we promote our acclaimed, enterprise-wide training, development and
mentorship initiative for women at Goldcorp, entitled Creating Choices. Creating Choices strengthens the ability of our female employees to: understand opportunities for personal and professional growth; develop their self-confidence and
courage; build strong



- 16 -



---

partnerships with fellow employees and communities where we operate; gain access to mentoring; and receive recognition for their contributions to Goldcorp. To date, over 1,700 women have
graduated from the program (1,300 graduates of Creating Choices, and 450 graduates of Growing Choices). In 2016, work began on the third installment of the program, Future Choices aimed at providing women with the tools they need to lead
and succeed long after mine closure.

Gender Diversity Initiatives: We are an industry leader in supporting and promoting the advancement of
women and womens issues in the global mining industry, as illustrated by the success of our Creating Choices program and the growing proportion of women and our Board (as at December 31, 2016, 33% of our directors were women). We
support the Womens Empowerment Principles (a partnership initiative of UN Women and UN Global Compact), are proud sponsors of Rugby Canadas National Senior Womens 15s and 7s Teams, and are active members of the Canadian Board
Diversity Council, the Canadian Centre for Diversity and Inclusion and the Minerva Foundation. In 2017, we will remain actively committed to pursuing and developing ongoing diversity initiatives at Goldcorp.

In addition, the following policies also promote and support diversity and inclusion: Code of Conduct; Corporate Social Responsibility Policy; Employee
Assistance Program; Harassment Policy (British Columbia and Ontario); Human Rights Policy; Occupational, Health and Safety Policy; and Environmental & Sustainability Policy.

Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy

Our anti-bribery
and anti-corruption policy (the Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy) outlines the requirements that must be fulfilled by all our employees, officers and directors, as well as by any third party working for or acting on our
behalf. These requirements include prohibitions against bribing government officials, making facilitation payments and commercial bribery.

The
Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy also provides employees with clarity regarding: books and records transparency; giving gifts to government officials; making political or charitable contributions; third party oversight and due diligence;
internal controls; and managements responsibility to promote an ethical tone from the top and create awareness of the policy.

Technical Information

CIM Definition Standards

The Mineral
Reserves and Mineral Resources estimations for the Red Lake Mines, the Porcupine Mine, the Musselwhite Mine, the Los Filos Mine, the Peñasquito Mine, the Cerro Negro Mine, the Marlin Mine, the Pueblo Viejo Mine, the Éléonore
Mine, the NuevaUnión Project, the Camino Rojo Project, the Cochenour Deposit, the Cerro Blanco Project, the Noche Buena Project, the San Nicolas Project and the Borden Project have been prepared in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards
that are incorporated by reference in NI 43-101. The following definitions are reproduced from the CIM Definition Standards:

A Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earths
crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known,
estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling. Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and
Measured categories.

An Inferred Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade
or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence
than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be



- 17 -



---

upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.

An Indicated
Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors (as
defined below) in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to assume
geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Mineral Reserve.

A Measured Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities,
shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is
derived from detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to confirm geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than that
applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral Resource. It may be converted to a Proven Mineral Reserve or to a Probable Mineral Reserve.

AMineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of a Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resource. It includes
diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at pre-feasibility or feasibility level as appropriate that include application
of Modifying Factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified. The reference point at which Mineral Reserves are defined, usually the point where the ore is delivered to the processing plant,
must be stated. It is important that, in all situations where the reference point is different, such as for a saleable product, a clarifying statement is included to ensure that the reader is fully informed as to what is being reported. The public
disclosure of a Mineral Reserve must be demonstrated by a pre-feasibility study or feasibility study.

A
Probable Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of an Indicated, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource. The confidence in the Modifying Factors applying to a Probable Mineral
Reserve is lower than that applying to a Proven Mineral Reserve.

A Proven Mineral Reserve is the
economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource. A Proven Mineral Reserve implies a high degree of confidence in the Modifying Factors.

For the purposes of the CIM Definition Standards, Modifying Factors are considerations used to convert Mineral Resources to
Mineral Reserves. These include, but are not restricted to, mining, processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental factors

JORC Code Definitions

The Ore Reserves and Mineral
Resources estimations for the Alumbrera Mine have been prepared in accordance with the current version of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code), the
Australian worldwide standards. The JORC Code has been accepted for current disclosure rules in Canada under NI 43-101. The following definitions are reproduced from the JORC Code:

A Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earths
crust in such form, grade (or quality), and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade (or quality), continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known,
estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling. Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and
Measured categories.



- 18 -



---

An Inferred Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which
quantity and grade (or quality) are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade (or quality) continuity. It is based on exploration, sampling and
testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource
and must not be converted to an Ore Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.

An Indicated Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade (or quality), densities,
shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is
derived from adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes, and is sufficient to assume geological and grade (or
quality) continuity between points of observation where data and samples are gathered. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Ore
Reserve.

A Measured Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade (or
quality), densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit.
Geological evidence is derived from detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes, and is sufficient to confirm geological
and grade (or quality) continuity between points of observation where data and samples are gathered. A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than that applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral
Resource. It may be converted to a Proved Ore Reserve or under certain circumstances to a Probable Ore Reserve.

AnOre
Reserve is the economically mineable part of a Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by
studies at pre-feasibility or feasibility level as appropriate that include application of Modifying Factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified.
The reference point at which Reserves are defined, usually the point where the ore is delivered to the processing plant, must be stated. It is important that, in all situations where the reference point is different, such as for a saleable product,
a clarifying statement is included to ensure that the reader is fully informed as to what is being reported.

A Probable Ore
Reserve is the economically mineable part of an Indicated, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource. The confidence in the Modifying Factors applying to a Probable Ore Reserve is lower than that applying to a
Proved Ore Reserve.

A Proved Ore Reserve is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource.
A Proved Ore Reserve implies a high degree of confidence in the Modifying Factors

For the purposes of the JORC Code, Modifying
Factors are considerations used to convert Mineral Resources to Ore Reserves. These include, but are not restricted to, mining, processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and
governmental factors.

The foregoing definitions of Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources as set forth in the JORC Code have been reconciled to the
definitions set forth in the CIM Definition Standards. If the Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources for the Alumbrera Mine were estimated in accordance with the definitions in the CIM Definition Standards, there would be no substantive difference in
such Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources.



- 19 -



---

Summary of Ore Reserve/Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates

Ore Reserve/Mineral Reserve Estimates

The following
table sets forth the gold, silver and copper Ore Reserve/Mineral Reserve estimations for the Red Lake Mines, the Porcupine Mine, the Borden Project, the Musselwhite Mine, the Los Filos Mine, the Peñasquito Mine, the Cerro Negro Mine, the
Alumbrera Mine, the Marlin Mine, the Pueblo Viejo Mine, the Éléonore Mine, the NuevaUnión Project, Camino Rojo Project and the Coffee Projecteffective June 30, 2016, unless otherwise indicated:

Proved/Proven and Probable Gold, Silver and Copper Ore/Mineral Reserves (1)(2)(3)(4)



|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                 |       |                          |  |       |            |  |  |                             |      |  |                             |      |      |                             |  |       |        |  |  |       |       | 
|--------------------------------- | ----------------- | ----------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | ---------------------- | --------------- | ----- | ------------------------ |  | ----- | ---------- |  |  | --------------------------- | ---- |  | --------------------------- | ---- | ---- | --------------------------- |  | ----- | ------ |  |  | ----- | ----- | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   | Grade  |  |                        | Contained Metal |      
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Deposit                           |                   | Category          |  | Tonnes
(millions) |        |  | Gold
(grams
per tonne) |                 |       | Silver
(grams
per tonne) |  |       | Copper
(%) |  |  | Gold
(millions of   ounces) |      |  | Silver
(millions of ounces) |      |      | Copper
(millions of pounds) | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Red Lake Mines (5)                |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 1.28   |  |                        |                 | 11.71 |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.48 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 6.26   |  |                        |                 | 7.67  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 1.54 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 7.55   |  |                        |                 | 8.36  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 2.03 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Porcupine Mine                    |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 7.86   |  |                        |                 | 2.59  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.65 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 37.83  |  |                        |                 | 1.34  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 1.62 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 45.70  |  |                        |                 | 1.55  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 2.28 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Borden Project                    |                   | Proven            |  |                   |       |  |                        |                 |      |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      |     |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 4.12   |  |                        |                 | 7.14  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.95 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 4.12   |  |                        |                 | 7.14  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.95 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Musselwhite Mine                  |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 3.17   |  |                        |                 | 6.79  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.69 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 5.04   |  |                        |                 | 6.14  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.99 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 8.21   |  |                        |                 | 6.39  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 1.69 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Los Filos Mine (6)                |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 23.88  |  |                        |                 | 0.75  |                          |  |       | 5.37       |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.57 |                             |  |       | 4.12   |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 16.83  |  |                        |                 | 1.65  |                          |  |       | 10.37      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.89 |                             |  |       | 5.61   |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 40.71  |  |                        |                 | 1.12  |                          |  |       | 7.44       |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 1.47 |                             |  |       | 9.73   |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Peñasquito Mine (7)               |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 393.84 |  |                        |                 | 0.58  |                          |  |       | 32.75      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 7.38 |                             |  |       | 414.73 |  |  |       |      | 
|Mill                              |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 195.16 |  |                        |                 | 0.40  |                          |  |       | 24.60      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 2.50 |                             |  |       | 154.34 |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 589.00 |  |                        |                 | 0.52  |                          |  |       | 30.05      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 9.89 |                             |  |       | 569.07 |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Peñasquito Mine (7)               |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 8.42   |  |                        |                 | 0.40  |                          |  |       | 22.99      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.11 |                             |  |       | 6.22   |  |  |       |      | 
|Heap Leach                        |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 2.06   |  |                        |                 | 0.39  |                          |  |       | 20.83      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.03 |                             |  |       | 1.38   |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 10.47  |  |                        |                 | 0.40  |                          |  |       | 22.56      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.13 |                             |  |       | 7.60   |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Cerro Negro Mine(8)               |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 5.02   |  |                        |                 | 9.86  |                          |  |       | 82.67      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 1.59 |                             |  |       | 13.35  |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 11.64  |  |                        |                 | 8.72  |                          |  |       | 59.81      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 3.26 |                             |  |       | 22.38  |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 16.66  |  |                        |                 | 9.06  |                          |  |       | 66.70      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 4.85 |                             |  |       | 35.73  |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Alumbrera Mine (9)                |                   | Proved            |  |                   | 15.11  |  |                        |                 | 0.39  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             | 0.24 |  |                             |      | 0.19 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 79    | 
|(Goldcorps 37.5% interest)       |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 1.43   |  |                        |                 | 0.37  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             | 0.17 |  |                             |      | 0.02 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 5     | 
|                                  | Proved + Probable |                   |  | 16.54             |        |  |                        | 0.39            |       |                          |  |      |            |  |  | 0.23                        |      |  |                             | 0.21 |      |                             |  |      |        |  |  | 84    |      
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Marlin Mine                       |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 0.42   |  |                        |                 | 4.08  |                          |  |       | 206.45     |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.05 |                             |  |       | 2.76   |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 0.09   |  |                        |                 | 4.18  |                          |  |       | 119.03     |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.01 |                             |  |       | 0.34   |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 0.50   |  |                        |                 | 4.10  |                          |  |       | 191.04     |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.07 |                             |  |       | 3.10   |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Pueblo Viejo Mine (10)(11)        |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 40.45  |  |                        |                 | 2.82  |                          |  |       | 18.68      |  |  |                             | 0.09 |  |                             |      | 3.67 |                             |  |       | 24.29  |  |  |       | 83    | 
|(Goldcorps 40% interest)         |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 16.77  |  |                        |                 | 3.19  |                          |  |       | 14.07      |  |  |                             | 0.10 |  |                             |      | 1.72 |                             |  |       | 7.58   |  |  |       | 37    | 
|                                  | Proven + Probable |                   |  | 57.21             |        |  |                        | 2.93            |       |                          |  | 17.33 |            |  |  | 0.10                        |      |  |                             | 5.39 |      |                             |  | 31.87 |        |  |  | 120   |      
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|Éléonore Mine (12)                |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 3.09   |  |                        |                 | 6.72  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 0.67 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 20.35  |  |                        |                 | 5.97  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 3.90 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 23.44  |  |                        |                 | 6.07  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |      | 4.57 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|NuevaUnión Project - El Morro     |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 160.91 |  |                        |                 | 0.56  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             | 0.55 |  |                             |      | 2.91 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 1,938 | 
|(Goldcorps 50% interest)         |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 138.62 |  |                        |                 | 0.35  |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             | 0.43 |  |                             |      | 1.55 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 1,313 | 
|                                  | Proven + Probable |                   |  | 299.53            |        |  |                        | 0.46            |       |                          |  |      |            |  |  | 0.49                        |      |  |                             | 4.46 |      |                             |  |      |        |  |  | 3,251 |      
|                                  |                   |                   |  |                   |        |  |                        |                
|NuevaUnión Project - Relincho(13) |                   | Proven            |  |                   | 217.65 |  |                        |                 |      |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             | 0.38 |  |                             |      |     |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 1,808 | 
|(Goldcorps 50%                   |                   | Probable          |  |                   | 401.91 |  |                        |                 |      |                          |  |       |           |  |  |                             | 0.37 |  |                             |      |     |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 3,279 | 



- 20 -



---

|                    |  |                          |  |                   |          |  |                        |                 |      |                          |  |  |            |  |  |                             |      |  |                             |  |       |                             |  |  |        |  |  |  |       | 
|------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------- | -------- |  | ---------------------- | --------------- | ---- | ------------------------ |  |  | ---------- |  |  | --------------------------- | ---- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----- | --------------------------- |  |  | ------ |  |  |  | ----- | 
|                    |  |                          |  |                   | Grade    |  |                        | Contained Metal |     
|                    |  |                          |  |                   |          |  |                        |                
|Deposit             |  | Category                 |  | Tonnes
(millions) |          |  | Gold
(grams
per tonne) |                 |      | Silver
(grams
per tonne) |  |  | Copper
(%) |  |  | Gold
(millions of   ounces) |      |  | Silver
(millions of ounces) |  |       | Copper
(millions of pounds) | 
|interest)           |  | Proven + Probable        |  |                   | 619.57   |  |                        |                 |     |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             | 0.37 |  |                             |  |      |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  | 5,087 | 
|                    |  |                          |  |                   |          |  |                        |                
|Camino Rojo Project |  | Proven                   |  |                   |         |  |                        |                 |     |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  |      |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  | Probable                 |  |                   | 75.52    |  |                        |                 | 0.70 |                          |  |  | 14.22      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  | 1.70  |                             |  |  | 34.53  |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  | Proven + Probable        |  |                   | 75.52    |  |                        |                 | 0.70 |                          |  |  | 14.22      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  | 1.70  |                             |  |  | 34.53  |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  |                          |  |                   |          |  |                        |                
|Coffee Project(14)  |  | Proven                   |  |                   |         |  |                        |                 |     |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  |      |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  | Probable                 |  |                   | 46.36    |  |                        |                 | 1.45 |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  | 2.16  |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  | Proven + Probable        |  |                   | 46.36    |  |                        |                 | 1.45 |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  | 2.16  |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  |                          |  |                   |          |  |                        |                
|Total Gold          |  | Proved/Proven            |  |                   | 663.45   |  |                        |                 | 0.89 |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  | 18.98 |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  | Probable                 |  |                   | 578.07   |  |                        |                 | 1.23 |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  | 22.85 |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  | Proved/Proven + Probable |  |                   | 1,241.52 |  |                        |                 | 1.05 |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  | 41.83 |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  |                          |  |                   |          |  |                        |                
|Total Silver        |  | Proven                   |  |                   | 472.03   |  |                        |                 |     |                          |  |  | 30.67      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  |      |                             |  |  | 465.47 |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  | Probable                 |  |                   | 318.06   |  |                        |                 |     |                          |  |  | 22.12      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  |      |                             |  |  | 226.17 |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  | Proven + Probable        |  |                   | 790.09   |  |                        |                 |     |                          |  |  | 27.23      |  |  |                             |     |  |                             |  |      |                             |  |  | 691.64 |  |  |  |      | 
|                    |  |                          |  |                   |          |  |                        |                
|Total Copper        |  | Proved/Proven            |  |                   | 434.12   |  |                        |                 |     |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             | 0.41 |  |                             |  |      |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  | 3,909 | 
|                    |  | Probable                 |  |                   | 558.73   |  |                        |                 |     |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             | 0.38 |  |                             |  |      |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  | 4,635 | 
|                    |  | Proved/Proven + Probable |  |                   | 992.84   |  |                        |                 |     |                          |  |  |           |  |  |                             | 0.39 |  |                             |  |      |                             |  |  |       |  |  |  | 8,543 | 



|(1) | All Mineral Reserves or Ore Reserves have been estimated in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards or the JORC
Code. The JORC Code has been accepted for current disclosure rules in Canada under NI 43-101. All Mineral Reserves and Ore Reserves have been reported effective June 30, 2016, unless otherwise indicated.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Other than the Mineral Reserves for Red Lake Mines, Peñasquito Mine, Cerro Negro Mine and Éléonore
Mine, all Mineral Reserves and Ore Reserves set out in the table above have been reviewed and approved by Gil Lawson, P.Eng., Vice President of Geology and Mine Planning, Goldcorp, who is a qualified person under NI
43-101.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Mineral Reserves are estimated using US$ commodity prices of $1,200 per ounce of gold, $18.00 per ounce of silver, $2.75
per pound of copper, unless otherwise noted.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------

|(5) | The Mineral Reserves for the Red Lake Mines set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision of Brad
Armstrong, P.Eng., Acting Chief Engineer  Campbell & Cochenour, at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven and Probable, and are based on
the CIM Definition Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Canada  Red Lake Mines, Canada  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | The Mineral Reserves for the Los Filos Mine are effective December 31, 2016.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | The Mineral Reserves for the Peñasquito Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision
of Dan Redmond, P.Geo., Director, Mine Planning & Reserves at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven and Probable, and are based on the CIM
Definition Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Latin America  Peñasquito Mine, Mexico  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(8) | The Mineral Reserves for the Cerro Negro Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision of
Andrew Tripp, P.E., Technical Services Manager, Cerro Negro, at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven and Probable, and are based on the CIM Definition
Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Latin America  Cerro Negro Mine, Argentina  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(9) | Mineral Reserves are provided by Glencore plc using US$ commodity prices of $1,300 per ounce of gold and $2.31 per pound
of copper. The effective date is December 31, 2016.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(10) | The Mineral Reserves for the Pueblo Viejo Mine set out in the table above are classified as Proven and Probable, and are
based on the CIM Definition Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Latin America  Pueblo Viejo Mine, Dominican Republic  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(11) | Mineral Reserves are provided by Barrick using US$ commodity prices of $1,200 per ounce of gold, $16.50 per ounce of
silver and $3.00 per pound of copper. The effective date is December 31, 2016.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(12) | The Mineral Reserves for the Éléonore Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the
supervision of Denis Fleury, P.Eng., Mining Engineer at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven and Probable, and are based on the CIM Definition
Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Canada  Éléonore Mine, Canada  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(13) | Mineral Reserves are provided by Teck using US$ commodity prices of $2.80per pound of copper.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(14) | Mineral Reserves as per information provided by Kaminak Gold Corporation effective the transaction date of July 19,
2016.
|---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 21 -



---

The following table sets forth the lead and zinc Mineral Reserve estimation for the Peñasquito Mine
 Mill:

Proven and Probable Lead and Zinc Mineral Reserves (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)



|                  |  |                   |        |  |          |  |      |                 |  |  |                          |  |  |                            |       |  |  |  |       | 
|----------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | -------- |  | ---- | --------------- |  |  | ------------------------ |  |  | -------------------------- | ----- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|                  |  |                   |        |  | Grade    |  |      | Contained Metal | 
|                  |  |                   |        |  |         
|Category          |  | Tonnes
(millions) |        |  | Lead
(%) |  |      | Zinc
(%)        |  |  | Lead
(millions ofpounds) |  |  | Zinc
(millions of  pounds) |      
|                  |  |                   |        |  |         
|Proven            |  |                   | 393.84 |  |          |  | 0.32 |                 |  |  | 0.78                     |  |  |                            | 2,747 |  |  |  | 6,787 | 
|Probable          |  |                   | 195.16 |  |          |  | 0.22 |                 |  |  | 0.50                     |  |  |                            | 937   |  |  |  | 2,141 | 
|Proven + Probable |  |                   | 589.00 |  |          |  | 0.28 |                 |  |  | 0.69                     |  |  |                            | 3,684 |  |  |  | 8,927 | 



|(1) | All Mineral Reserves have been estimated in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards. All Mineral Reserves have been
reported effective June 30, 2016.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The Mineral Reserves for the Peñasquito Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision
of Dan Redmond, P.Geo., Director, Mine Planning & Reserves at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | The Mineral Reserves for the Peñasquito Mine set out in the table above are classified as Proven and Probable, and
are based on the CIM Definition Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Latin America  Peñasquito Mine, Mexico  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Mineral Reserves are estimated using US$ commodity prices of $0.90 per pound of lead, and $0.95 per pound of zinc.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------

The following table sets forth the molybdenum Mineral Reserve estimation for the NuevaUnión Project  Relincho deposit:

Proven and Probable Molybdenum Mineral Reserves (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)



|                  |  |                   |        |  |                |       |                                 |    
|----------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | -------------- | ----- | ------------------------------- | ---
|                  |  |                   |        |  | Grade          |       | Contained Metal                
|                  |  |                   |       
|Category          |  | Tonnes
(millions) |        |  | Molybdenum
(%) |       | Molybdenum
(millions of pounds)
|                  |  |                   |       
|Proven            |  |                   | 217.65 |  |                | 0.016 |                                 | 77 
|Probable          |  |                   | 401.91 |  |                | 0.018 |                                 | 162
|Proven + Probable |  |                   | 619.57 |  |                | 0.017 |                                 | 239



|(1) | All Mineral Reserves have been estimated in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards. All Mineral Reserves have been
reported effective June 30, 2016.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | All Mineral Reserves set out in the table above have been reviewed and approved by Gil Lawson, P.Eng., Vice President of
Geology and Mine Planning, Goldcorp, who is a qualified person under NI 43-101.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | The Mineral Reserves for the NuevaUnión Project  Relincho deposit set out in the table above are classified
as Proven and Probable, and are based on the CIM Definition Standards.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Mineral Reserves are provided by Teck using a US$ commodity price of $13.70per pound of molybdenum.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------



- 22 -



---

Mineral Resource Estimates

The following table sets forth the gold, silver and copper Mineral Resource estimations for the Red Lake Mines, Cochenour Deposit, Porcupine Mine,
Musselwhite Mine, Éléonore Mine, Los Filos Mine, Peñasquito Mine, Cerro Negro Mine, the Alumbrera Mine, the Marlin Mine, Pueblo Viejo Mine, NuevaUnión Project, Cerro Blanco Project, Noche Buena Project, San Nicolas
Project, Camino Rojo Project, Borden Project and Coffee ProjecteffectiveJune 30, 2016, unless otherwise indicated:

Measured,
Indicated and Inferred Gold, Silver and Copper Mineral Resources (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)

(excluding Proved/Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves)

|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |      |       |                         |  |   |            |  |  |                            |      |  |                            |      |       |                             |  |   |        |  |  |    |    | 
|--------------------------- | -------------------- | -------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | ---------------------- | ---- | ----- | ----------------------- |  | - | ---------- |  |  | -------------------------- | ---- |  | -------------------------- | ---- | ----- | --------------------------- |  | - | ------ |  |  | -- | -- | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  | Grade                  |      |       | Contained Metal         | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Deposit                     |                      | Category             |  | Tonnes
(millions) |        |  | Gold
(grams
per tonne) |      |       | Silver(grams
per tonne) |  |   | Copper
(%) |  |  | Gold
(millions of  ounces) |      |  | Silver
(millions ofounces) |      |       | Copper
(millions of pounds) | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Red Lake Mines (6)          |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 1.43   |  |                        |      | 19.79 |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.91  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 3.05   |  |                        |      | 15.38 |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 1.51  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 4.48   |  |                        |      | 16.79 |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 2.42  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 4.58   |  |                        |      | 17.77 |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 2.62  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Cochenour Deposit (6)       |                      | Measured             |  |                   |       |  |                        |      |      |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 0.60   |  |                        |      | 15.03 |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.29  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 0.60   |  |                        |      | 15.03 |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.29  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 3.91   |  |                        |      | 17.09 |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 2.15  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Porcupine Mine              |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 25.16  |  |                        |      | 1.40  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 1.13  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 198.06 |  |                        |      | 1.16  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 7.39  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 223.22 |  |                        |      | 1.19  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 8.52  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 45.15  |  |                        |      | 1.64  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 2.38  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Musselwhite Mine            |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 0.37   |  |                        |      | 4.79  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.06  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 2.51   |  |                        |      | 5.01  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.40  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 2.88   |  |                        |      | 4.98  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.46  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 6.80   |  |                        |      | 5.48  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 1.20  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Éléonore Mine (7)           |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 3.21   |  |                        |      | 7.27  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.75  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 1.92   |  |                        |      | 2.97  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.18  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 5.14   |  |                        |      | 5.66  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.93  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 9.73   |  |                        |      | 7.52  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 2.35  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Los Filos Mine (8)          |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 111.67 |  |                        |      | 0.80  |                         |  |   | 6.35       |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 2.88  |                             |  |   | 22.79  |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 270.15 |  |                        |      | 0.82  |                         |  |   | 9.38       |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 7.14  |                             |  |   | 81.49  |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 381.82 |  |                        |      | 0.82  |                         |  |   | 8.49       |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 10.02 |                             |  |   | 104.28 |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 162.65 |  |                        |      | 0.76  |                         |  |   | 9.80       |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 4.00  |                             |  |   | 51.25  |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Peñasquito Mine (9)         |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 118.40 |  |                        |      | 0.28  |                         |  |   | 27.24      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 1.05  |                             |  |   | 103.68 |  |  |    |   | 
|Mill                        |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 185.08 |  |                        |      | 0.27  |                         |  |   | 22.76      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 1.60  |                             |  |   | 135.46 |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 303.49 |  |                        |      | 0.27  |                         |  |   | 24.51      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 2.66  |                             |  |   | 239.14 |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 28.22  |  |                        |      | 0.30  |                         |  |   | 19.37      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.27  |                             |  |   | 17.58  |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Peñasquito Mine (9)         |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 7.33   |  |                        |      | 0.21  |                         |  |   | 32.14      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.05  |                             |  |   | 7.57   |  |  |    |   | 
|Heap Leach                  |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 15.23  |  |                        |      | 0.20  |                         |  |   | 23.60      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.10  |                             |  |   | 11.55  |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 22.56  |  |                        |      | 0.21  |                         |  |   | 26.38      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.15  |                             |  |   | 19.13  |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 0.04   |  |                        |      | 0.01  |                         |  |   | 5.02       |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.00  |                             |  |   | 0.01   |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Cerro Blanco Project        |                      | Measured             |  |                   |       |  |                        |      |      |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 2.05   |  |                        |      | 12.69 |                         |  |   | 40.13      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.84  |                             |  |   | 2.64   |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 2.05   |  |                        |      | 12.69 |                         |  |   | 40.13      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.84  |                             |  |   | 2.64   |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 0.75   |  |                        |      | 9.34  |                         |  |   | 43.61      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.23  |                             |  |   | 1.06   |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Cerro Negro Mine(10)        |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 1.39   |  |                        |      | 6.36  |                         |  |   | 70.84      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.28  |                             |  |   | 3.16   |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 5.46   |  |                        |      | 6.20  |                         |  |   | 47.42      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 1.09  |                             |  |   | 8.32   |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 6.84   |  |                        |      | 6.23  |                         |  |   | 52.17      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 1.37  |                             |  |   | 11.48  |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 2.13   |  |                        |      | 4.15  |                         |  |   | 32.06      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.28  |                             |  |   | 2.19   |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Alumbrera Mine (11)         |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 14.89  |  |                        |      | 0.28  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            | 0.28 |  |                            |      | 0.14  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    | 92 | 
|(Goldcorps 37.5% interest) |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 1.05   |  |                        |      | 0.21  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            | 0.23 |  |                            |      | 0.01  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    | 5  | 
|                            | Measured + Indicated |                      |  | 15.94             |        |  |                        | 0.28 |       |                         |  |  |            |  |  | 0.28                       |      |  |                            | 0.14 |       |                             |  |  |        |  |  | 98 |   
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 1.50   |  |                        |      | 0.26  |                         |  |   |           |  |  |                            | 0.15 |  |                            |      | 0.01  |                             |  |   |       |  |  |    | 5  | 
|                            |                      |                      |  |                   |        |  |                        |     
|Marlin Mine                 |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 0.27   |  |                        |      | 4.51  |                         |  |   | 193.95     |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.04  |                             |  |   | 1.66   |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 0.20   |  |                        |      | 4.60  |                         |  |   | 193.74     |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.03  |                             |  |   | 1.23   |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 0.46   |  |                        |      | 4.55  |                         |  |   | 193.86     |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.07  |                             |  |   | 2.89   |  |  |    |   | 
|                            |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 0.04   |  |                        |      | 6.68  |                         |  |   | 333.44     |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.01  |                             |  |   | 0.39   |  |  |    |   | 



- 23 -



---

|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |      |      |                         |  |       |            |  |  |                            |      |  |                            |      |       |                             |  |       |        |  |  |       |       | 
|--------------------------------- | -------------------- | -------------------- |  | ----------------- | -------- |  | ---------------------- | ---- | ---- | ----------------------- |  | ----- | ---------- |  |  | -------------------------- | ---- |  | -------------------------- | ---- | ----- | --------------------------- |  | ----- | ------ |  |  | ----- | ----- | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  | Grade                  |      |      | Contained Metal         | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|Deposit                           |                      | Category             |  | Tonnes
(millions) |          |  | Gold
(grams
per tonne) |      |      | Silver(grams
per tonne) |  |       | Copper
(%) |  |  | Gold
(millions of  ounces) |      |  | Silver
(millions ofounces) |      |       | Copper
(millions of pounds) | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|Pueblo Viejo Mine (12)(13)        |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 6.79     |  |                        |      | 2.33 |                         |  |       | 14.53      |  |  |                            | 0.09 |  |                            |      | 0.51  |                             |  |       | 3.17   |  |  |       | 13    | 
|(Goldcorps 40% interest)         |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 63.64    |  |                        |      | 2.33 |                         |  |       | 11.22      |  |  |                            | 0.09 |  |                            |      | 4.76  |                             |  |       | 22.97  |  |  |       | 120   | 
|                                  | Measured + Indicated |                      |  | 70.43             |          |  |                        | 2.33 |      |                         |  | 11.54 |            |  |  | 0.09                       |      |  |                            | 5.27 |       |                             |  | 26.14 |        |  |  | 133   |      
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 1.90     |  |                        |      | 2.05 |                         |  |       | 9.76       |  |  |                            | 0.02 |  |                            |      | 0.12  |                             |  |       | 0.60   |  |  |       | 1     | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|NuevaUnión Project  El Morro     |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 9.90     |  |                        |      | 0.53 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            | 0.51 |  |                            |      | 0.17  |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 112   | 
|(Goldcorps 50% interest)         |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 36.28    |  |                        |      | 0.38 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            | 0.39 |  |                            |      | 0.44  |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 315   | 
|                                  | Measured + Indicated |                      |  | 46.18             |          |  |                        | 0.41 |      |                         |  |      |            |  |  | 0.42                       |      |  |                            | 0.61 |       |                             |  |      |        |  |  | 427   |      
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 339.03   |  |                        |      | 0.30 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            | 0.35 |  |                            |      | 3.23  |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 2,595 | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|NuevaUnión Project - Relincho(14) |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 39.95    |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            | 0.27 |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 240   | 
|(Goldcorps 50% interest)         |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 158.54   |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            | 0.34 |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 1,181 | 
|                                  | Measured + Indicated |                      |  | 198.50            |          |  |                        |     |      |                         |  |      |            |  |  | 0.32                       |      |  |                            |     |       |                             |  |      |        |  |  | 1,421 |      
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 305.41   |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            | 0.38 |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 2,550 | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|Noche Buena Project               |                      | Measured             |  |                   |         |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 55.00    |  |                        |      | 0.37 |                         |  |       | 12.35      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.65  |                             |  |       | 21.84  |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 55.00    |  |                        |      | 0.37 |                         |  |       | 12.35      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.65  |                             |  |       | 21.84  |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 4.94     |  |                        |      | 0.22 |                         |  |       | 8.08       |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.03  |                             |  |       | 1.28   |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|San Nicolas Project(14)           |                      | Measured             |  |                   |         |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|(Goldcorps 21% interest)         |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 19.26    |  |                        |      | 0.46 |                         |  |       | 26.70      |  |  |                            | 1.24 |  |                            |      | 0.28  |                             |  |       | 16.53  |  |  |       | 527   | 
|                                  |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 19.26    |  |                        |      | 0.46 |                         |  |       | 26.70      |  |  |                            | 1.24 |  |                            |      | 0.28  |                             |  |       | 16.53  |  |  |       | 527   | 
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 2.28     |  |                        |      | 0.26 |                         |  |       | 17.40      |  |  |                            | 1.24 |  |                            |      | 0.02  |                             |  |       | 1.27   |  |  |       | 62    | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|Camino Rojo Project               |                      | Measured             |  |                   |         |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 223.08   |  |                        |      | 1.05 |                         |  |       | 9.02       |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 7.50  |                             |  |       | 64.72  |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 223.08   |  |                        |      | 1.05 |                         |  |       | 9.02       |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 7.50  |                             |  |       | 64.72  |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 17.16    |  |                        |      | 0.88 |                         |  |       | 9.06       |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.49  |                             |  |       | 5.00   |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|Borden Project                    |                      | Measured             |  |                   |         |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 3.02     |  |                        |      | 5.77 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.56  |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 3.02     |  |                        |      | 5.77 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.56  |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 2.30     |  |                        |      | 5.49 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.41  |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|Coffee Project(15)                |                      | Measured             |  |                   |         |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 17.69    |  |                        |      | 1.21 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.69  |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 17.69    |  |                        |      | 1.21 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 0.69  |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 52.35    |  |                        |      | 1.31 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 2.21  |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|Total Gold                        |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 300.80   |  |                        |      | 0.82 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 7.97  |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 1,103.33 |  |                        |      | 1.00 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 35.47 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 1,404.13 |  |                        |      | 0.96 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 43.43 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 685.45   |  |                        |      | 1.00 |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      | 22.00 |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|Total Silver                      |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 245.85   |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       | 17.97      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       | 142.04 |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 839.14   |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       | 13.59      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       | 366.75 |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Measured +Indicated  |  |                   | 1,084.99 |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       | 14.59      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       | 508.79 |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 220.10   |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       | 11.39      |  |  |                            |     |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       | 80.63  |  |  |       |      | 
|                                  |                      |                      |  |                   |          |  |                        |     
|Total Copper                      |                      | Measured             |  |                   | 71.52    |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            | 0.29 |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 458   | 
|                                  |                      | Indicated            |  |                   | 278.77   |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            | 0.35 |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 2,148 | 
|                                  |                      | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 350.30   |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            | 0.34 |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 2,605 | 
|                                  |                      | Inferred             |  |                   | 650.12   |  |                        |      |     |                         |  |       |           |  |  |                            | 0.36 |  |                            |      |      |                             |  |       |       |  |  |       | 5,213 | 



|(1) | All Mineral Resources have been estimated in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards or the JORC Code. The JORC Code
has been accepted for current disclosure rules in Canada under NI 43-101. All Mineral Resources have been reported effective June 30, 2016, unless otherwise indicated.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Other than the Mineral Resources for Red Lake Mines, Peñasquito Mine, Cerro Negro Mine and Éléonore
Mine, all Mineral Resources set out in the table above, have been reviewed and approved by Gil Lawson, P.Eng, Vice President of Geology and Mine Planning, Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | All Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources are not known with the same degree of
certainty as Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Mineral Resources are estimated using US$ commodity prices of $1,400 per ounce of gold, $20 per ounce of silver and $3.00
per pound of copper, unless otherwise noted. NuevaUnión Project  El Morro deposit is estimated using a US$ commodity price of $1,200 per ounce of gold and $2.75 per pound of copper.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------



- 24 -



---

|(6) | The Mineral Resources for Red Lake Mines and the Cochenour Deposit set out in the table above have been prepared under
the supervision of Ian Russell, P.Geo. Manager of Exploration, Regional Exploration Geology at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and
Inferred, and are based on the CIM Definition Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Canada  Red Lake Mines, Canada  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | The Mineral Resources for the Éléonore Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the
supervision of Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Director of Exploration at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred, and are based
on the CIM Definition Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Canada  Éléonore Mine, Canada  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(8) | The Mineral Resources for the Los Filos Mine are effective December 31, 2016.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(9) | The Mineral Resources for the Peñasquito Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision
of Guillermo Pareja, P.Geo., Manager of Mineral Resources at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred, and are based on the CIM
Definition Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Latin America  Peñasquito Mine, Mexico  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(10) | The Mineral Resources for the Cerro Negro Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision of
Guillermo Pareja, P.Geo., Manager of Mineral Resources at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred, and are based on the CIM
Definition Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Latin America  Cerro Negro Mine, Argentina  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(11) | Mineral Resources are provided by Glencore plc using long-term US$ commodity prices of $1,300 per ounce of gold and $3.06
per pound of copper. The effective date is December 31, 2016.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(12) | The Mineral Resources for the Pueblo Viejo Mine set out in the table above are classified as Measured, Indicated and
Inferred, and are based on the CIM Definition Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Latin America  Pueblo Viejo Mine, Dominican Republic  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource
Estimates for further details.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(13) | Mineral Resources provided by Barrick using long-term US$ commodity prices of $1,500 per ounce of gold, $17.50 per ounce
of silver and $3.25 per pound of copper. The effective date is December 31, 2016.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(14) | Mineral Resources provided by Teck using US$ commodity prices of $1,275 per ounce of gold, $22.50 per ounce of silver,
$2.75 per pound of copper for San Nicolas and $2.80 per pound of copper for NuevaUnión Project  Relincho deposit.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(15) | Mineral Resources as per information provided by Kaminak Gold Corporation effective as of July 19, 2016.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table sets forth the lead and zinc Mineral Resource estimations forthe Peñasquito Mine, the Camino
Rojo Project and the San Nicolas Project effective June 30, 2016:

Measured, Indicated and Inferred Lead and Zinc Mineral Resources (1)(2)(3)(4)

(excluding Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves)



|                          |  |                      |  |                   |        |  |          |  |      |                 |  |  |                          |  |  |                            |       |  |  |  |       | 
|------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | -------- |  | ---- | --------------- |  |  | ------------------------ |  |  | -------------------------- | ----- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|                          |  |                      |  |                   |        |  | Grade    |  |      | Contained Metal | 
|                          |  |                      |  |                   |        | 
|Deposit                   |  | Category             |  | Tonnes
(millions) |        |  | Lead
(%) |  |      | Zinc
(%)        |  |  | Lead
(millions ofpounds) |  |  | Zinc
(millions of  pounds) |      
|                          |  |                      |  |                   |        | 
|Peñasquito Mine (5)       |  | Measured             |  |                   | 118.40 |  |          |  | 0.25 |                 |  |  | 0.60                     |  |  |                            | 660   |  |  |  | 1,563 | 
|Mill                      |  | Indicated            |  |                   | 185.08 |  |          |  | 0.20 |                 |  |  | 0.50                     |  |  |                            | 810   |  |  |  | 2,037 | 
|                          |  | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 303.49 |  |          |  | 0.22 |                 |  |  | 0.54                     |  |  |                            | 1,469 |  |  |  | 3,600 | 
|                          |  | Inferred             |  |                   | 28.22  |  |          |  | 0.21 |                 |  |  | 0.31                     |  |  |                            | 128   |  |  |  | 193   | 
|                          |  |                      |  |                   |        | 
|Camino Rojo Project       |  | Measured             |  |                   |       |  |          |  |     |                 |  |  |                         |  |  |                            |      |  |  |  |      | 
|                          |  | Indicated            |  |                   | 146.97 |  |          |  | 0.08 |                 |  |  | 0.27                     |  |  |                            | 260   |  |  |  | 876   | 
|                          |  | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 146.97 |  |          |  | 0.08 |                 |  |  | 0.27                     |  |  |                            | 260   |  |  |  | 876   | 
|                          |  | Inferred             |  |                   | 10.07  |  |          |  | 0.07 |                 |  |  | 0.24                     |  |  |                            | 15    |  |  |  | 53    | 
|                          |  |                      |  |                   |        | 
|San Nicolas Project       |  | Measured             |  |                   |       |  |          |  |     |                 |  |  |                         |  |  |                            |      |  |  |  |      | 
|(Goldcorps 21% interest) |  | Indicated            |  |                   | 19.26  |  |          |  |     |                 |  |  | 1.68                     |  |  |                            |      |  |  |  | 713   | 
|                          |  | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 19.26  |  |          |  |     |                 |  |  | 1.68                     |  |  |                            |      |  |  |  | 713   | 
|                          |  | Inferred             |  |                   | 2.28   |  |          |  |     |                 |  |  | 0.97                     |  |  |                            |      |  |  |  | 49    | 
|                          |  |                      |  |                   |        | 
|Total Lead                |  | Measured             |  |                   | 118.40 |  |          |  | 0.25 |                 |  |  |                         |  |  |                            | 660   |  |  |  |      | 
|                          |  | Indicated            |  |                   | 332.05 |  |          |  | 0.15 |                 |  |  |                         |  |  |                            | 1,069 |  |  |  |      | 
|                          |  | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 450.46 |  |          |  | 0.17 |                 |  |  |                         |  |  |                            | 1,729 |  |  |  |      | 
|                          |  | Inferred             |  |                   | 38.29  |  |          |  | 0.17 |                 |  |  |                         |  |  |                            | 143   |  |  |  |      | 
|                          |  |                      |  |                   |        | 
|Total Zinc                |  | Measured             |  |                   | 118.40 |  |          |  |     |                 |  |  | 0.60                     |  |  |                            |      |  |  |  | 1,563 | 
|                          |  | Indicated            |  |                   | 351.32 |  |          |  |     |                 |  |  | 0.47                     |  |  |                            |      |  |  |  | 3,626 | 
|                          |  | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 469.72 |  |          |  |     |                 |  |  | 0.50                     |  |  |                            |      |  |  |  | 5,189 | 
|                          |  | Inferred             |  |                   | 40.56  |  |          |  |     |                 |  |  | 0.33                     |  |  |                            |      |  |  |  | 295   | 



- 25 -



---

|(1) | All Mineral Resources have been estimated in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards. All Mineral Resources have
been reported effective June 30, 2016, unless otherwise indicated.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Other than the Mineral Resources for Peñasquito Mine, all Mineral Resources set out in the table above have been
reviewed and approved by Gil Lawson, P.Eng., Vice President of Geology and Mine Planning, Goldcorp, who is a qualified person under NI 43-101.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Mineral Resources are estimated using US$ commodity prices of $1.00 per pound of lead and $1.00 per pound of zinc.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------

|(5) | The Mineral Resources for the Peñasquito Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision
of Guillermo Pareja, P.Geo., Manager of Mineral Resources at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred, and are based on the CIM
Definition Standards. See Description of the Business  Mineral Properties  Latin America  Peñasquito Mine, Mexico  Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates for further details.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table sets forth the molybdenum Mineral Resource estimations for the NuevaUnión Project  Relincho deposit effective
June 30, 2016:

Measured, Indicated and Inferred Molybdenum Mineral Resources
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)



|                     |  |                   |        |  |                |       |                                 |   
|-------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | -------------- | ----- | ------------------------------- | --
|                     |  |                   |        |  | Grade          |       | Contained Metal                
|                     |  |                   |       
|Category             |  | Tonnes
(millions) |        |  | Molybdenum
(%) |       | Molybdenum
(millions of pounds)
|                     |  |                   |       
|Measured             |  |                   | 39.95  |  |                | 0.009 |                                 | 8 
|Indicated            |  |                   | 158.54 |  |                | 0.012 |                                 | 40
|Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 198.50 |  |                | 0.011 |                                 | 48
|Inferred             |  |                   | 305.41 |  |                | 0.013 |                                 | 88



|(1) | All Mineral Resources have been estimated in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards. All Mineral Resources have
been reported effective June 30, 2016.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | All Mineral Resources set out in the table above have been reviewed and approved by Gil Lawson, P.Eng., Vice President of
Geology and Mine Planning, Goldcorp, who is a qualified person under NI 43-101.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | The Mineral Resources for the NuevaUnión Project  Relincho deposit set out in the table above are classified
as Measured, Indicated and inferred, and are based on the CIM Definition Standards.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Mineral Resources are provided by Teck using US$ commodity prices of $13.70per pound of molybdenum.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------

MINERAL PROPERTIES

CANADA

Our properties in Canada include the Red Lake Mines, the Porcupine Mine, the Musselwhite Mine, the Éléonore Mine and the Borden Project.
The Red Lake Mines and the Éléonore Mine, each described below, are considered to be material properties.

Red Lake Mines, Canada

The Red Lake Mines, wholly-owned by Goldcorp, are located in the Red Lake district, Ontario.

The scientific and technical information included in the following section has been derived from the technical report entitled Red Lake Operations,
Ontario Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Red Lake Report) dated effective December 31, 2015 prepared by Stephane Blais, P.Eng., Chris Osiowy, P.Geo., and Nuri Hmidi, P.Eng., each
of whom is a qualified person under NI 43-101.

Project Description, Location and Access

The Red Lake Mines are owned by Goldcorp (87.45%) and Goldcorp Canada Ltd. (Goldcorp Canada) (12.55%) through a partnership. The
operations comprise the former Campbell and Red Lake underground mines, which are now integrated and operate as a single entity by Red Lake Mines. In this annual information form, the shafts and mill at Red Lake are collectively termed the Red Lake
Complex; those at Campbell are termed the Campbell Complex. The combined mine area is also referred to as the greater Red LakeCampbell Complex. The Cochenour Complex covers mineralization discovered at the Western Discovery Zone deposit and
the former CochenourWillans mine and also includes the former Gold Eagle Mines joint venture property (see  History below).



- 26 -



---

The Red Lake mining operation is located 180 kilometres north of the town of Dryden, District of Kenora,
northwestern Ontario. The Red Lake area is accessible by Highway 105, which joins the Trans-Canada Highway at Vermilion Bay, 175 kilometres south and 100 kilometres east of Kenora, Ontario. Commercial air services operate to Red Lake from Thunder
Bay and Winnipeg.

The Red Lake Complex consists of 89 patented mineral claims covering 1,254 hectares and the Campbell Complex consists of 77
patented mineral claims covering 1,084 hectares. Claims are held in the name of either Goldcorp, or Goldcorp Canada, or are jointly held by the two companies. The Cochenour Complex, including the Golden Eagle Mines joint venture property, covers
1,358.21 hectares, and comprises 110 patented mineral rights, licences of occupation, lease mineral rights, and one staked claim (each, a claim). Tenure is jointly held in the names of Goldcorp (87.45%), Goldcorp Canada (12.55%) or, in
the case of 72 of the claims, held in the name of Gold Eagle Mines Ltd. (100%). As required under Ontario law, patented mining lands have been surveyed. Required fees and duties have been paid to the appropriate regulatory authorities, and the
claims are in good standing. Leases have associated work commitments and fees. Ten-year leases are renewable in perpetuity for periods of 10 years, provided the renewal application is lodged 90 days
before expiry of the lease. A 21-year lease may be renewed provided that the lessee can prove that the mining lease is being used for mining purposes and meets certain criteria, and application for
renewal is made prior to the expiry date of the lease.

Red Lake Mines has collaboration agreements with two First Nations that are signatory to
Treaty No. 3 and have treaty rights which they assert within the operations area of the Red Lake Mines region: Obishikokaang Collaboration Agreement executed August 16, 2013 with Lac Seul First Nation (LSFN) and Goldcorp
Canada; and a second Collaboration Agreement which became effective on January 29, 2015 with Wabauskang First Nation (WFN) and Goldcorp Canada. LSFN is located to the southeast of Red Lake with a band membership of 3,200 and
WFN is located to the south of Red Lake with a band membership of 315. These agreements provide a framework for strengthened collaboration in the development and operations of Red Lake Mines and outline tangible benefits for the individual First
Nations, including skills training and employment, opportunities for business development and contracting, and a framework for issues resolution, regulatory permitting and our future financial contributions.

We hold sufficient surface rights to support the Red LakeCampbell mining operations and associated infrastructure, and sufficient surface rights
in the Cochenour Complex to support any proposed re-development. Environmental permits are required by various federal, provincial, and municipal agencies and are in place for all current operations. No new
permits are currently required for current exploration activity and mining operations, but existing permit amendments are required from time to time. The Cochenour Complex closure plan was filed in April 2014, and the closure plan for the Red
Lake-Campbell Complex was filed in May 2015. The Red Lake Mines and Cochenour Complex closure plans satisfy all regulatory requirements.We are satisfied that all environmental liabilities are identified in the existing closure plans for the
operations, which are limited to those that would be expected to be associated with gold mines that have been operating for more than 60 years, and where production is from underground sources, including roads, site infrastructure, and waste and
tailings disposal facilities.

History

Red Lake Complex

The first recorded prospecting in the Red Lake district was carried out by the northwestern Ontario Exploration Company in 1887. Red Lake was first
staked during the Red Lake Gold Rush in 1926. In 1944, the property was re-staked and Dickenson Red Lake Mines Limited was incorporated. Production mining began in 1948 at a rate of 113 tonnes per day and
increased to 454 tonnes per day in the 1970s. In the early 1980s, the mill capacity was increased to 907 tonnes per day and long-hole stoping was introduced. The change in mining method resulted in a severe drop in production grade. Cut-and-fill mining was subsequently re-introduced and production reached approximately 907 tonnes per day by 1993 to 1994. An
exploration core drilling program initiated in 1995 within the lower levels of the mine resulted in the discovery of a cluster of high grade gold veins. The #3 shaft was developed from January



- 27 -



---

2004 to January 2007 to a depth of 1,925 metres. Since the beginning of operations in 1948 until the end of 2016, 12.8 million tonnes grading 25.48 grams per tonne (g/t)
of gold has been mined, producing 10,487,961 gold ounces.

Campbell Complex

The Campbell claims were staked in 1926. Subsequently, there was a period of claim cancellations and re-staking
of the area. In the 1940s, George and Colin Campbell re-staked the area, Campbell Red Lake Mines was incorporated and Dome Mines Limited (Dome Mines) purchased an option that eventually
resulted in Dome Mines acquiring a 57% ownership interest in the Campbell Red Lake Mines company. In 1946, after additional exploration had been carried out, a four-compartment shaft with four levels was sunk to a depth of 182 metres. Mill
construction began in 1948 and the mill went into operation the following year reaching a capacity of 272 tonnes per day. The shaft was deepened to 655 metres in the 1950s to exploit a high-grade zone discovered on the 14th level of the mine. Following the merger of Campbell Red Lake Mines, Dome Mines and Placer Development Limited, in 1987, an autoclave was installed at the Campbell Complex, replacing the existing
roaster, the mill flotation circuit was upgraded, a paste-fill plant constructed, an underground decline developed, and the Reid Shaft was commissioned. Since the beginning of operations in 1946 until the end of 2016, 22.3 million tonnes
grading 17.69 g/t of gold has been mined, producing 12,679,290 gold ounces.

Cochenour Complex

The original claims on the Cochenour-Willans property were staked in 1926 to 1927 by W.M Cochenour, D. Willans and H.G. Young, and in 1928 the
CochenourWillans syndicate was formed. CochenourWillans Gold Mines Ltd. was incorporated in 1936 and production began in 1939 at a rate of 136 to 181 tonnes per day. Operations ran for 32 years, from 1939 to 1971, during which about
2.1 million tonnes grading 18.44 g/t of gold was processed with approximately 1.24 million ounces of gold recovered. Underground mine workings extended down to the 670 metre level.

In 1997, we purchased a 100% interest in the CochenourWillans mine area. We completed trenching, grab sampling and compilation work between 1998
and 2002. The mine was allowed to flood in 2003. Surface drilling was undertaken from 2002 to 2009, consisting of 94 surface drill holes, totalling 66,968 metres. Following dewatering, in 2010, renewed access to the underground Cochenour-Willans
workings allowed completion of 49 underground drill holes (20,558 metres), together with 17 surface drill holes (including wedges) totalling 13,881 metres.

The Cochenour No. 1 shaft was slashed and deepened to below the 34 level in 2010 to 2014 to support exploration and development of the recently
acquired Gold Eagle property located to the south. Both decline and incline ramp developments are currently active from the 34 level station.

Geological
Setting, Mineralization and Deposit Types

The mineralization within the Red Lake Mines operations is typical of Archean greenstone belt-hosted
gold deposits. The Red Lake greenstone belt is located in the western portion of the Uchi Subprovince of the Canadian Shield. The project area is underlain mainly by tholeiitic basalt and locally by komatiitic basalt of the Balmer Assemblage. The
mine sequence also includes felsic, peridotitic and other mafic to lamprophyric intrusive rocks of various younger ages. The steeply-dipping, southsouthwest-folded package is unconformably overlain by felsic volcaniclastic rocks, and clastic
and chemical sedimentary rocks of the Bruce Channel assemblage.

The local package of rocks have been significantly flattened and folded. Fold limbs
of the relatively plastic ultramafic units are so thinned and attenuated that major shear zones formed along them. These shear zones acted as primary hydrothermal fluid transportation corridors and host a significant portion of the gold
mineralization in the area. Other significant mineralized structures occur within lower-strain areas of the stratigraphy, usually associated with brittle conjugate fracture systems in close proximity to lithological boundaries possessing high
competency contrasts.



- 28 -



---

Gold deposits in the district have been classified into three main categories: mafic volcanic-hosted,
felsic intrusive-hosted and stratabound. The majority of the productive zones in the Red Lake camp are of the mafic volcanic-hosted type and occur as vein systems and accompanying sulphide replacement within sheared mafic to komatiitic basalts of
the Balmer Assemblage.

There are generally three styles of mineralization in the Red LakeCampbell Complex: vein replacement mineralization,
replacement mineralization, and sulphide mineralization. Vein replacement ore involves intense silica replacement of precursor ankerite veins often accompanied by abundant visible gold and minor sulphides. This is the dominant mineralization type
found in zones such as the Red Lake High Grade Zone (HGZ) and the Campbell G and L zones. Replacement mineralization involved the intense silica replacement of sheared mafic rocks accompanied by abundant arsenopyrite and
pyrrhotite ± biotite. This style of mineralization commonly envelops vein replacement mineralization, but can occur elsewhere. Sulphide mineralization is typically found within broad zones of strongly sheared mafic rocks and consists of fine
disseminated pyrrhotite (as much as 30%) accompanied by biotite alteration.

Two styles of mineralization occur within the CochenourWillans
mine footprint: mineralization associated with discrete shear structures immediately in the footwall of the Cochenour Thrust structure, and mineralization that occurs well into the footwall north of the Cochenour Thrust associated with intersections
between northsouth carbonated shear zones with iron formation. The Bruce Channel deposit mineralization is hosted in highly sheared and sulphidized mafic rocks or in grey sulphide replacement breccia zones. The Western
Discovery Zone mineralization consists of a series of sub-parallel, quartz-rich veinlets and tension veins developed in intrusive rocks of the McKenzie granodiorite stock.

Gold appears as free milling gold as well as refractory, arsenopyrite-associated gold for all deposits.

The knowledge of the Red Lake deposit setting and lithologies, and of the mineralization style and its structural and alteration controls, is sufficient
to support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation. Mineralization style and setting of the Cochenour Deposit is sufficiently well understood to support Mineral Resource estimation.

Exploration

The Red Lake operations have a long exploration
and mining history. Gold mineralization was first identified in 1922. The original Red Lake mine commenced production in 1948, and the Campbell mine in 1949.

Exploration activities at Red Lake have included regional and detailed geological and structural mapping, rock, silt and soil sampling, trenching,
reverse circulation and diamond drilling, airborne geophysical surveys, ground induced polarization geophysical surveys, mineralization characterization and petrographic studies, metallurgical testing of samples, Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve
estimates, baseline environmental, geotechnical and hydrological studies, and technical studies.

In 2016, exploration drilling programs totalling
192,189 metres with 780 core holes were carried out at the Red Lake and Campbell Complexes; 72,238 metres with 364 core holes at the Cochenour deposit..

The exploration programs completed to date are appropriate to the known mineralization styles. There is considerable remaining exploration potential in
the vicinity of the current mining operations and the Red Lake region.

Drilling

A significant amount of surface and underground core drill data has been collected over the 60+ year history of Red Lake. Drilling from 1947 to 2016 at
the Red Lake and Campbell Complexes totals 65,204 drill holes (approximately 6,042,000 metres). Drilling at the Cochenour Complex from 19392016 comprises about 17,739 drill holes (approximately 2,083,240 metres).



- 29 -



---

Currently, exploration drill data spacing for the Red Lake Complex range from 45 metres to 100 metres. In
development and stope areas, underground drilling infills this spacing to approximately 7.515 metres x 7.515 metres. Intercept spacing is variable due to the irregular location of drill sites and the complex distribution of the
mineralized zones. Drilling at the Cochenour Complex is infilling from the previous 100 metre x 100 metre spacing.

Standardized logging forms and
geological legends are currently used. Logs record assays, lithologies, veining and replacement zones, vein styles and percentage amounts over sampled interval lengths and intensity, sulphide mineralization type and intensity, alteration type and
intensity, faults and fracture frequency and orientation, rock quality designation, and structure type, frequency and intensity. Select drill holes are photographed.

Core quality is very high, with core recovery on average >95% on all core sizes. There are no areas where poor recovery is consistently encountered.

The collars of all drill holes are surveyed by transit for location, bearing and dip and tied into the mine grid. The same grid is used for all of
the mine complexes.

Downhole surveys since 1995 at Red Lake were conducted in a systematic manner with a gyroscopic (gyro) survey instrument
(unaffected by magnetics) used for drill holes steeper than 70°, and a Reflex Maxibor survey instrument used for drill holes with flatter dips. Site specifications require downhole surveys at 30 metre intervals or less. In the earlier stages of
the mining operation, Sperry Sun multi-shot, Icefield multi-shot, Light-Log and Tropari instruments were used, but the gyro and Maxibor units have replaced this instrumentation.

Downhole surveys at the Campbell Complex utilized Reflex and Ranger electronic compass single-shot surveys tests. Most of the drill holes greater than
120 metres are surveyed using the Maxibor method. Prior to that, Pajari test instruments were used, which provided azimuth and dip orientations. Sperry Sun multi-shot instruments were used on deep (> 300 metre holes) for a period from the early
1980s to the late 1990s. Pre-1980 and into the 1990s, drill hole inclination was derived using acid tests. This type of testing has been replaced by Reflex electronic compass single-shot surveys.

Downhole surveying on both complexes (since 2006) utilizes a combination of testing equipment that can include Reflex, Maxibor and north-seeking
gyro, depending on the depth of the drill holes.

Drill data are typically verified prior to Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation by
running a software program check.

Core sampling practices have varied between predecessor companies and over time. Typically, historic core
sampling has targeted mineralized zones with additional bracket samples taken in waste rock. Current practice has changed, with some exceptions, to sampling the entire drill hole. Presently a high percentage of core sent out for assaying is whole
core. A certain amount of core is cut and retained. This core in recent years has been from select deep high grade zone drilling and surface drilling.

At Red Lake Complex, sampling honored lithological and mineralized zone boundaries. Typical sample lengths were 90 centimetres for un-mineralized intervals, 60 centimetres or less for mineralized intervals, and 30 centimetres intervals for visible gold, though samples were taken on shorter intervals that directly corresponded to very narrow,
high-grade mineralized structures.

Until 1999 at the Campbell Complex, sample lengths were typically in the 0.61.0 metres range, and usually
shorter in the higher-grade sections. Low-grade rock and waste were typically sampled over 0.61.5 metres lengths, averaging 0.67 metres. High-grade sections were sampled over 15 centimetres to 60
centimetres intervals for BQ and NQ core, and 0.90 metres for smaller AQ/AQTK core, except where significant geological differences were present, these normally being narrow, high-grade occurrences.

For production purposes, chip sampling is performed on a blast-by-blast
basis by the production geology team, while muck sampling is done by the miner during the mucking process. Muck samples are used to



- 30 -



---

provide a general guide and back-up information for day to day operation, while test holes are required to ascertain that no mineralization is missed in
the walls of the stope.

Historically a specific gravity of 2.91 (11.0 cubic feet per short ton) has been used at the Red Lake Complex. A specific
gravity of 2.98, developed from composite averages, is used for the HGZ. During completion of the resource estimation on the Cochenour Complex, a specific gravity of 2.91 was used for all zones except the Western Discovery Zone.

The quantity and quality of the lithological, geotechnical, collar, and down-hole survey data collected during the exploration and infill drill programs
are sufficient to support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation.

Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification

Given the long production history, a number of laboratories have been used in support of operations.

Core drill and underground samples were analysed by a combination of independent laboratories and the Red Lake and Campbell Complex run-of-mine laboratories, using industry-standard methods for gold analysis. In general, exploration and infill core programs were analysed by independent laboratories using
industry-standard methods for gold analysis from 2001. Current run-of-mine sampling is performed by the mine laboratory, which is operated independently of Goldcorp.
Historically, the Campbell and Red Lake run-of-mine laboratories primarily performed day to day assays for mining operational purposes; however, exploration core has
also been processed through the laboratories. Neither laboratory has held International Organization for Standardization (ISO) accreditation. All remaining laboratories used for analytical data have held ISO certifications since
2001; it is not known what certification was held prior to that date.

Sample preparation for exploration and run-of-mine samples consists of drying as required, crushing, and selection of a sub-split that is then pulverized to produce a pulp sample sufficient for analytical
purposes. Production samples and drill core are kept separate in the mine site laboratories to reduce the risk of contamination. The sample preparation procedure is in line with industry-standard methods for gold deposits that have coarse visible
gold and a high nugget effect.

Samples are typically analyzed using fire assay with a gravimetric or atomic absorption finish, depending on the
anticipated grade of the sample. In 2010, selected exploration drill core samples were submitted for inductively-coupled plasma analysis as well as the regular fire assay/atomic absorption/gravimetric analysis. A certain percentage of the samples
were also selected for pulp metallic analysis.

The collected sample data adequately reflect deposit dimensions, true widths of mineralization, and
the style of the deposits.

There is limited information available on the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) employed
for the earlier drill programs; however, sufficient programs of reanalysis have been performed that the data can be accepted for use in estimation. Our drill programs since 2006 on the Red Lake and Campbell Complexes have included insertion of blank
and standard reference material (SRM) samples. Submission of QA/QC samples was initiated for the Cochenour Complex in 2010, and comprises submission of SRM and blank materials.

Data that were collected were subject to validation, using in-built program triggers that automatically checked
data on upload to the database. Data are also verified against the original hard copy monthly reports, as well as in other software packages. Verification is performed on all digitally-collected data on upload to the main database, and includes
checks on surveys, collar co-ordinates, lithology data, and assay data. The checks are appropriate, and consistent with industry standards.

Drill core sample security is maintained at the Red LakeCampbell Complex and the Cochenour Complex through supervision of transport of the core
from the underground/surface drill or sample site, through to the logging facility and to the in-house or external assay laboratories.
Chain-of-custody procedures consisted of filling out sample submittal forms that were sent to the laboratory with sample shipments to



- 31 -



---

make certain that all samples were received by the laboratory. Current sample storage procedures and storage areas are consistent with industry standards.

The quality of the gold analytical data are sufficiently reliable to support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation and that sample
preparation, analysis, and security are generally performed in accordance with exploration best practices and industry standards.

A number of data
verification programs and audits have been performed at Red Lake Mines over recent history by independent consultants in support of technical reports and by our personnel in support of mining studies. We have also performed our own internal
validations. Data verification checks were performed as follows:

 Micon International Limited (2004, 2006): Micon staff
reviewed available data in support of technical reports prepared in 2004 and 2006 for Exall/Southern Ventures; no material biases or errors noted;

 Watts, Griffis, and McOuat (2005, 2007): reviewed the QA/QC program and the logging and sampling/assaying procedures; concluded
at the time of each audit that the database was in good order and that the procedures were to industry standards; and


Goldcorp (2006 to date): database validation checks, laboratory inspections; no material biases or errors noted.

A reasonable level of verification
has been completed, and no material issues have been left unidentified from the programs undertaken. Data verification programs completed on the data collected adequately support the geological interpretations, and the quality of the analyses and
the analytical database, and therefore support the use of the data in Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation.

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical
Testing

Over the project history, a significant number of metallurgical studies and accompanying laboratory-scale and/or pilot plant testwork
have been completed. Studies included mineralogical studies, grindability and comminution testwork, bench and pilot plant flotation tests, thickener tests and reagent testwork.

Programs were sufficient to establish the optimal processing routes for the Red LakeCampbell ores, were performed on mineralization that was
typical of the deposits, and supported estimation of recovery factors for the various ore types.

Testwork to date on the Cochenour Complex
mineralization indicates three distinct mineralization types. All three mineralization types can be treated in the current Campbell process plant, but the plant may have to be modified or expanded, depending on how much each zone contributes to the
mill feed, to handle the larger amount of sulphide content that could significantly tax the current autoclave and leaching circuits. The Bond work index determinations showed that the Bruce Channel mineralization hardness can be described as
moderate to moderately soft. Therefore the mineralized material should be readily processed in the existing grinding circuit at the Campbell Complex. Relatively poor leach-only recoveries indicated that a refractory ore treatment process (autoclave)
is required to achieve reasonable overall gold recovery. The much higher sulphur and arsenic grades within the Cochenour Complex mineralization will result in significantly higher concentrate production levels, up to twice as much as the current
Campbell Complex levels.



- 32 -



---

Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates

The following table sets forth the gold Mineral Reserve estimations for Red Lake Mines effective June 30, 2016:

Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)



|                  |  |                   |  |                         |  |                                     
|----------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Category          |  | Tonnes
(millions) |  | Grade
(grams per tonne) |  | Contained Metal
(millions of ounces)
|Proven            |  | 1.28              |  | 11.71                   |  | 0.48                                
|Probable          |  | 6.26              |  | 7.67                    |  | 1.54                                
|Proven + Probable |  | 7.55              |  | 8.36                    |  | 2.03                                



|(1) | Mineral Reserves for the Red Lake Mines set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision of Brad
Armstrong, P.Eng., Acting Chief Engineer  Campbell & Cochenour, at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves,
and are based on the CIM Definition Standards.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Mineral Reserves are estimated using a gold price of $1,200 per ounce and a US$ exchange rate of C$1.20. These assume
processing costs of $39.79 per tonne, mining operating costs of $184.12 per tonne and general and administrative (G&A) costs of $62.96 per tonne, for a total
life-of-mine estimated operating cost of $286.87 per tonne.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | The estimated metallurgical recovery rate is 96% for the operation as a whole.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | All decisions for inclusion or exclusion of material as Mineral Reserves are based on a detailed assessment of costs
versus revenues. A global cut-off grade was calculated to be 7.9 g/t. Individual cut-off grades were used for design purposes and are dependent on mining method and
area. The following cut-off grades were used: long-hole low cost: 6 g/t gold; long-hole higher cost: 6.4 g/t gold; and
cut-and-fill: 17 g/t gold.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Mineral Reserves are constrained within mineable shapes, with varying mining widths that vary from 2.4 to 10.7 metres,
depending on the geometry of the ore body and mining method used. The operations use 100% mine recovery for scheduling the life-of-mine plan Mineral Reserves.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------

|(7) | To date, no Mineral Reserves have been established for the Cochenour Deposit.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table sets forth the gold Mineral Resource estimation for Red Lake Mines effective June 30, 2016:

Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)

(excluding Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves)



|                      |  |                      |  |                   |  |                         |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Deposit               |  | Category             |  | Tonnes
(millions) |  | Grade
(grams per tonne) |  | Contained Metal
(millions of ounces)
|                      |  | Measured             |  | 1.43              |  | 19.79                   |  | 0.91                                
|Red Lake Mines        |  | Indicated            |  | 3.05              |  | 15.38                   |  | 1.51                                
|                      |  | Measured +Indicated  |  | 4.48              |  | 16.79                   |  | 2.42                                
|                      |  | Inferred             |  | 4.58              |  | 17.77                   |  | 2.62                                
|                      |  |                      |  |                  
|                      |  | Measured             |  |                  |  |                        |  |                                    
|Cochenour Deposit (5) |  | Indicated            |  | 0.60              |  | 15.03                   |  | 0.29                                
|                      |  | Measured + Indicated |  | 0.60              |  | 15.03                   |  | 0.29                                
|                      |  | Inferred             |  | 3.91              |  | 17.09                   |  | 2.15                                



|(1) | The Mineral Resources for Red Lake Mines and Cochenour Deposit set out in the table above have been prepared under the
supervision of Ian Russell, P.Geo. Manager of Exploration, Regional Exploration Geology at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and
Inferred Mineral Resources, and are based on the CIM Definition Standards.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | All Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of those Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves. Mineral
Resources are not known with the same degree of certainty as Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Based on a gold price of$1,400per ounce and a US$ exchange rate of C$1.20.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Mineral Resources are reported using variable cut-off grades depending on the
mineralization type and zone. The mineral resource cut-off grade averages 7.30 g/t. The in-situ block model has been diluted to minimum horizontal widths of 1.2 metres
in the HGZ and 1.80 metres in all other zones. Dilution is assigned zero grade.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | The Inferred Mineral Resources for the Cochenour Deposit are estimated using a top cap grade of 70 grams to 200g/t gold depending on the geology and zone, and a cut-off grade of 6.00g/t gold.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Mineral Resources for Red Lake-Campbell Complex are estimated using 94% metallurgical recovery, and 90% metallurgical
recovery for Cochenour Complex.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------



- 33 -



---

Environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing and political factors and
constraints have been taken into account. The Mineral Reserves are acceptable to support mine planning. Areas of uncertainty that may materially impact the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates include: commodity price and exchange rate
assumptions used; rock mechanics (geotechnical) constraints; geological complexity; and maintaining constant underground access to all working areas.

Mining
Operations

Red Lake Mines consists of a single underground operating mine (Red Lake and Campbell Complexes) and an advanced underground
exploration program (Cochenour). Mining consists of: longhole, mechanized underhand or overhand cut and fill techniques and development mining methods. Mined areas are routinely paste filled to maintain overall stability. Production forecasts are
expected to be achievable with the current equipment and plant, and replacements have been acceptably scheduled.

There is also potential to extend
the mine life if some or all of the Inferred Mineral Resources identified within the life-of-mine (LOM) production plan can be upgraded to higher
confidence Mineral Resource categories. Mineralization remains open at depth.

Mining is carried out in Red Lake Mines using a combination of long
hole, mechanized underhand or overhand cut-and-fill techniques, which allows greater ore extraction while generating minimal dilution. Stope sequencing is carefully
analyzed and adapted to surrounding conditions to alleviate seismic activity induced by mining. Stope sequencing is based on an amalgamation of elastic/plastic stress modelling, seismic system data analysis and underground observations. Once mining
blocks or lifts are completed, waste rock fill, paste fill, or a combination of both, is employed to fill the open excavation.

Mineral Resources
classified as either Indicated or Measured are considered during conversion to Mineral Reserves. The requirements for Mineral Resources to be converted to Mineral Reserves are: only Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources can be included, dilution
is included and Mineral Reserves are supported by an economic mine plan.

As part of
day-to-day operations, we will continue to undertake reviews of the mine plan and consideration of alternatives to and variations within the mine plan. Alternative
scenarios and reviews can be based on ongoing or future mining considerations, evaluation of different potential input factors, assumptions and corporate directives.

Processing and Recovery Operations

Campbell Complex

At the Campbell Complex, conventional crushing and grinding is followed by gravity concentration to recover free-milling gold. Refractory gold, finely
disseminated in the arsenopyrite and pyrite matrix, is recovered by flotation followed by pressure oxidation, neutralization and carbon-in-leach. This stream joins the non-refractory flotation tails and is recovered by cyanidation/carbon-in-pulp (CIP) processing. The plant nominal
capacity is 1,800 tonnes per day and the average process plant recovery is 94.5%.

Tailing can either be discharged to the tailing management area,
or sent underground by piston pump for use as backfill as a paste. Cement and flyash is added to the paste and the paste fill is used to stabilize mined out openings in the Campbell Complex.

Red Lake Complex

Process facilities at the Red Lake Complex
consist of three separate plants: the crushing plant; processing plant; and paste fill plant. Commercial production from the facilities began on January 1, 2001. The plant nominal capacity is 1,250 tonnes per day and the average process plant
recovery is 97.0%.

The crushing plant is a two-stage process which reduces underground ore from about 30
centimetres to 1 centimetres. Underground ore from a coarse ore bin is fed to a jaw crusher and sizing screen. Screen



- 34 -



---

oversize is crushed in a cone crusher and screen undersize is conveyed into a fine ore bin as plant feed material.

Unit operations in the processing plant include grinding, gravity concentrating, cyanidation, CIP, carbon elution and reactivation, electrowinning,
bullion smelting/refining, cyanide destruction, flotation, and concentrate handling. Coarse gold is recovered from the ore via the gravity concentrating circuit. A portion of the ground slurry from the ball mill is fed to two Knelson concentrators
which produce a gravity concentrate that is upgraded on a Diester table to a concentration of approximately 75% gold, and directly smelted into bullion. Bullion is then shipped to a refinery for later sale into the spot market. The Red Lake Complex
processing plant also employs a typical sulphide flotation circuit generating a bulk sulphide concentrate. This concentrate is pumped as slurry to the Campbell Complex for processing in the autoclave.

Infrastructure, Permitting and Compliance Activities

Mining
activities are conducted in and about the Municipality of Red Lake and are located near established power and road infrastructure. Local businesses offer most goods and services required for mineral exploration and development. Additional supplies
can be sourced as needed from Thunder Bay, Winnipeg and Toronto. Together with multiple shaft accesses to the underground workings, we maintain administrative, technical, operations support, and processing facilities on the active sites. There are
modern camp facilities to maintain the required permanent workforce for operations and construction.

Potable water is supplied by the municipality
and paid for on a usage basis. Process water is taken from Balmer Lake and Sandy Bay. Power is supplied through Hydro One via the E2R radial line. Diesel-powered generators provide temporary emergency power in the event of a main electrical
disruption to allow the mine site to maintain basic services. Waste rock is stored in designated areas at both the Red Lake and Campbell Complexes.The waste pads are located in a historic tailings area east of the site at the Red Lake
Complex and on the northeast side of the main tailings pond at the Campbell Complex. The tailings storage facilities at the Campbell and Red Lake Complexes are currently permitted for dam raises that will provide storage to 2020 and 2019,
respectively.

Environmental permits are required by various Federal, Provincial, and municipal agencies, and are in place for project operations.
Red Lake Mines maintains a list of active environmental permits covering operation of the Campbell and Red Lake Complexes and Balmer Assemblage. We hold the appropriate permits under local, provincial, and Federal laws to allow current exploration
activity and mining operations. No new permits are currently required, but existing permit amendments are required from time to time, and in 2017, applications for amendments may be made for tailings management area upgrades (i.e. dam raises),
air/noise permits, permit to take water renewals, and exploration permitting. Permit amendments are routinely applied for and obtained to accurately reflect ongoing operational needs of the mining facilities.

The environmental management system and environmental and social management plans were developed in accordance with the appropriate Canadian
regulations.

Arsenic remains a focus in most environmental programs for all project operations. Arsenopyrite is a main element in the local
geology, contained in ore and waste rock and requires specific management in environmental programs.

Waste rock and ore are routinely sampled for
acid rock drainage potential as per the internal programs for acid rock drainage and metal leaching. Since there are no significant acid rock drainage issues related to the waste and ore from the Campbell and Red Lake Complexes and Balmer
Assemblage, waste rock materials can be used for construction purposes.

Active tailings facilities for the operations were designed by third-party
consultants. Annual geotechnical and facility inspections are conducted by these firms. In addition, engineering assessments and investigations to enhance tails storage strategies are performed as required.

Water treatment processes are in place at both milling/tailings facilities to address the destruction of



- 35 -



---

cyanide and metals in solution. Both the Campbell and Red Lake operations utilize passive wetland treatment technologies to assist with the reduction of ammonia from mining and milling processes.
All effluent discharges to the environment are in compliance with all applicable laws.

Long-term development of site-specific water quality
objectives for closure, the Campbell Complex West Dam groundwater program, and the long term stabilization of underground arsenic storage facilities continue to be the focus of ongoing research and closure planning.

The mining complexes are situated on the edges of the Red Lake district communities which make them a part of the community landscapes. Given these
proximities, operational and environmental considerations are paramount, as are our commitments to social, cultural, and community support. We currently have representation on various local organizations such as the local municipal planning boards,
hospital boards, economic development board, and maintains an open dialogue with the community.

Capital and Operating Costs

Capital cost estimates are based on experience gained from current operations, 2016 budget data, and quotes received from manufacturers during 2016.
Capital cost estimates include funding for infrastructure, mobile equipment replacement, development, drilling, and permitting as well as miscellaneous expenditures required to maintain production. Infrastructure requirements are incorporated in the
estimates as appropriate. Mobile equipment is scheduled for replacement when operating hours reach threshold limits. Sustaining capital costs reflect current price trends. The remaining
life-of-mine capital expenditure is estimated at $286.1 million.

Area

Life-of-Mine ($ million)Sustaining

$286.1Expansionary

Total

$286.1


Operating cost estimates are based on actual historical data and include adjustments to reflect market conditions.
The estimated average annual operating cost is $286.87 per tonne, consisting of $39.79 per tonne for processing, $184.12 per tonne for mining, and $62.96 per tonne for G&A.

Area

Life-of-Mine
($ per tonne)Process
Plant

$39.79Mining Operations

$184.12General & Administration

$ 62.96Total

$286.87


Exploration, Development and Production

Red Lake and Campbell Complexes

Horizontal development in
2017 is planned for both the Red Lake and Campbell Complexes at a combined rate of 21.7 metres per kilo-tonne of ore, with an additional one metre per kilo-tonne of vertical development. During 2016, the main HGZ haulage ramp was deepened and
reached a depth of 2,360 metres below surface. In 2017, the focus will be on expansion of R Zone, URL, Far East and PLM zones to access the ore and for further delineation.

Mine exploration drilling in 2016 focused on the R Zone, URL (F Zone), Campbell targets (56 zone), Party Wall (NL, E, AH), HGZ extensions and the
FW/Sulphides Zones. Exploration of the R Zone was carried out from the 27 and 36 level exploration drift (Campbell access) as well as the 41 and 47 levels (Red Lake Complex). Exploration on the HGZ was carried out from several elevations throughout
the mine,



- 36 -



---

with grassroots HGZ extension drilling and reserve conversion. During 2016, several exploration drifts, located on the 41, 44, level (Red Lake) and 36 level (Campbell), were completed for further
R Zone development. These drifts provided expanded drilling platforms during the end of 2016 and will be utilized during 2017.

Cochenour Complex

Cochenour shaft expansion and the Red Lake-Cochenour haulage drift are intensive capital projects that have provided access to the new Cochenour
Deposit. Construction of a five-kilometre haulage drift to connect the Cochenour Complex with the Campbell Complex on the 36 level (1,645 metres below surface) was completed by the end of 2014. During 2015, the Footwall Zone and the Upper Main Zone
were accessed via drifting and ramping from 36 level and the deposit was developed and sampled in 2015. Ore development also included mining two long hole blocks in 2016, in the Upper Main Zone area and in the Banded Iron Formation rock unit in the
Footwall Zone area.

The Cochenour shaft established to 34 level provided access for exploration of the upper deposits. The Main downcast
ventilation fan installations on surface at the Cochenour shaft was commissioned early in 2015. Ramp development down from 3400 to 3990 level and 3990 level development were completed by January 2016.

At Cochenour Complex, the project focus shifted in 2016 to further define the geological complexity and changes to the orientation of the deposit.
Development concentrated on the advancement of two stope-levels in the upper portion of the deposit at 3990 and 4060 Level. These levels underwent a bulk sample program utilizing a sample tower to compare assay results with the underground chip data
to confirm the average grade of the Upper Main Zone at these elevations.

During 2016, the focus of exploration was on drilling and development to
increase the level of confidence in interpreting the deposit. Drilling continued from the 3990 and 4060 level with up to 8 drills, totalling 72,238 metres. Initial sill development, along with definition drilling and drift mapping has shown geologic
complexity and changes in the orientation of the mineralized structures. Exploration and development continue at Cochenour Complex to increase the understanding of the deposit. Late in 2016, an oriented core drilling program and a core re-logging program were implemented to assist in interpreting the deposit.

H.G. Young

In 2016, a total of 73,874 metres were drilled from both surface and underground with 213 holes. Surface drilling was focused on infill drilling to
increase the confidence in the Resource Classification and the underground drilling was focused on testing the down dip potential of the structures below 14 level. At the end of 2016, 2,380 metres were drilled with the orientation tool (included in
previous numbers), 3,802 metres from surface and 4,010 metres from underground. Orientated drilling will continue from both surface and underground in 2017 in order to get better understanding of the geological model and increase the drilling
success.

In 2017, Red Lake Mines is expected to produce 1,722 tonnes per day of which 96% is expected be sourced from the Red Lake Complex and 4%
is expected to be sourced from the Campbell Complex. Production forecasts are expected to be achievable with the current equipment and plant, and replacements have been acceptably scheduled. Gold production guidance for 2017 is expected to be
300,000 ounces (+/- 5%). See Risk Factors  Our financial projections rely on estimates of future production and estimates of future production may not be reliable, which could have a negative impact on our future cash flows, business,
results of operations and financial condition.

Éléonore Mine, Canada

The Éléonore Mine, wholly-owned by Goldcorp and located in northern Québec, is one of the largest underground mines in Canada and a
cornerstone of our portfolio.

The scientific and technical information included in the following section has been derived from the technical report
entitled Éléonore Operations, Quebec, Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the ÉléonoreReport) dated effective December 31, 2015
prepared by Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Denis



- 37 -



---

Fleury, P.Eng., Andy Fortin, P.Eng., and Luc Joncas, P.Eng., each of whom is a qualified person under NI 43-101.

Project Description, Location and Access

The
Éléonore Mine is located in the Lake Ell area, in the north-eastern part of the Opinaca Reservoir of the James Bay region, in the Province of Québec, Canada. The Éléonore Mine is located approximately
350 kilometres north of the towns of Matagami and Chibougamau, and 825 kilometres north of Montréal. A permanent road with two permanent bridges has been completed, extending from the Sarcelle hydroelectric facility to the
Éléonore Mine. The Sarcelle station can be reached via a 40 kilometre gravel road, starting at the 396 kilometre marker along the James Bay Highway. All of the material, supplies, and food for the construction and operational phases
are transported along this access route. Workers are brought on site via a permanent year-round air strip located approximately 1.5 kilometres north of the camp.

The Éléonore Mine comprises 369 contiguous claims totalling 19,274 hectares. The claims are 100% owned by Les Mines Opinaca
Ltée (Opinaca). We purchased a block of four claims totalling 208 hectares located in the central area of the property in 2011 through an agreement with Wemindji Exploration. The Éléonore Mine hosts the
Roberto gold deposit, which consists of the Roberto, East Roberto, and Zone du Lac lenses. The Roberto deposit is located under the Opinaca Reservoir. Claims are map-staked and not surveyed on the ground and
are valid for a two-year period and can be renewed every two years, subject to payment of renewal fees and minimum exploration work requirements. The 284-hectare mining
lease covering the Roberto deposit was signed by the Minister of Natural Resources of Québec on February 21, 2014.

The
Éléonore Mine is located entirely in Cree territory, or Eeyou Istchee, on Category III lands belonging to the Québec government and subject to the James Bay and Northern Québec Agreement. Surface leases were obtained from
the Ministry of Natural Resources for all infrastructures planned for the Éléonore Mine.

A royalty payable on production from the
Éléonore Mine to Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. is set at 2.20% on the first three million ounces of gold, and increases by 0.25% per million ounces thereafter, up to a maximum of 3.5%. The royalty is applicable to the
entire Éléonore Mine. The royalty payable in each period is adjusted up or down by an amount ranging between zero and 10%, depending on the gold price in effect during that period. We also make an annual payment to the Cree
Nation under the terms of the confidential Opinagow Collaboration Agreement dated February 21, 2011 between Goldcorp, the Cree Nation of Wemindji, the Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee) and the Cree Nation Government.

The Éléonore Mine currently holds all required permits to operate including environmental permits.

History

The first recorded exploration in the
Éléonore Mine area was by Noranda Inc. (Noranda), in 1964. Noranda identified a copper showing located within the Ell Lake diorite intrusion. In 2001, Osisko Mining Corporation (Osisko) completed
regional reconnaissance grab and channel sampling around Norandas Ell Lake copper showing; this work identified a number of new showings. A series of mineralized corridors consisting of stockworked gold and chalcopyrite-bearing quartz veinlets
were outlined within dioritic to tonalitic intrusions. In addition, a number of mineralized and partially-rounded erratic blocks, located about 300 metres from the mineralized corridors, returned significantly elevated copper, gold, and silver
values.

From June to August 2004, additional trenching was performed on the Roberto Zone. Osisko commenced core drilling in September 2005 and
by November 2005 a total of 247 core holes had been drilled. Drilling completed by Osisko successfully extended the mineralization found at surface to a depth of 800 metres below surface. It also extended the mineralization beyond the Roberto
Peninsula into the James Bay area and on the north shore of Ell Lake as well as to the south.



- 38 -



---

We reached an agreement to acquire the Éléonore Mine with Osisko in November 2005. We
took control of the Éléonore Mine on March 31, 2006. Since the acquisition, we have performed till sampling, lake-bottom sediment sampling, surface mapping and trenching, additional core drilling, geological modelling and
Mineral Resource estimation.

Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit Types

The Roberto deposit is located in Archaean rocks of the Superior Province of Canada in the transition zone between the Opinaca Subprovince and the La
Grande Subprovince. The contact between the two subprovinces is not well known and generally corresponds to regional-scale deformation zones and a sharp change in the metamorphic gradient. In some areas, the contact is masked by late intrusions of
one or the other subprovince.

The Opinaca Subprovince basin is a sedimentary basin dominated by migmatized paragneisses and diatexites from the
Laguiche Complex and intruded by syn to post-tectonic tonalite, granodiorite, granite and pegmatite intrusions from the Janin and Boyd instrusive suites. The metamorphic grade increases from amphibolites facies near the margins to granulite facies
toward the center of the basin. The paragneisses are strongly metamorphosed and folded rocks that retained few of their original structures.

The S-shaped La Grande Subprovince surrounds the Opinaca Subprovince on its west and north sides, spanning a distance of 450 kilometres in the east-west direction and
of 250 kilometres in the north-south direction. The La Grande Subprovince is an assemblage of volcano-plutonic rocks composed of 85% intrusive rocks and 15% volcano-sedimentary units, the latest forming the
volcano-sedimentary units of the La Grande River and Eastmain River green belts. These assemblages overlay an older tonalitic basement. Metamorphic grade increases from the greenschist facies to the amphibolites facies toward the contact with the
Opinaca Subprovince. The Éléonore Mine is overlain by rocks of the Eastmain Group of the La Grande Subprovince. At its base, the Eastmain Group consists of the Bernou Formation and the Kasak Formation, which are composed of basalts and
intermediate to felsic tuff.

Regional faults are mainly present in the La Grande Subprovince and are oriented northsouth, eastwest, and
northwestsoutheast. In outcrop, the faults can be recognized by either a strong tectonic banding or by the presence of intense shear zones with mylonitization. In the Opinaca Subprovince, faults and shear zones are mainly located along fold
limbs.

The Éléonore Mine straddles the contact between the Opinaca and La Grande Subprovinces. The contact is located in the
northeast corner of the property along a north-westerly trend that is defined by a strong shear zone, a change in the magnetic grain, and an increase in the metamorphic gradient. The Éléonore Mine is hosted in Achaean-age rocks of a volcano-sedimentary greenstone belt developed near the contact between the Opinaca and La Grande Subprovinces of the Superior Province. Rock units from the Opinaca Subprovince occur in the
north-eastern corner of the Éléonore Mine area. Lithologies are dominated by granite, granodiorites and heterogeneous assemblages of pegmatites, tonalites and granites from the Janin Intrusive Suite intermixed with partially migmatized
paragneiss from the Laguiche Complex. The structural grain is oriented in a north-westerly direction evolving to an eastwest grain toward the east part of the Éléonore Mine area.

Rock units belonging to the La Grande Subprovince comprise most of the Project area west of the contact and host the Roberto deposit. The Roberto
deposit is hosted in polydeformed greywacke units in contact with aluminosilicate-bearing greywacke and thin conglomerate units. The 1.9 kilometres long crescent shape of the deposit is the result of F2 folding. To date, mineralization has been
intersected to a vertical depth of 1,400 metres. Gold-bearing zones are generally 56 metres in true thicknesses, varying from 2 metres to more than 20 metres locally. All zones are remaining open at depth.

Information from production drilling and underground mapping has shown that folding in the southern area edge of the main shoot is tighter than
previously interpreted.



- 39 -



---

The numerous subparallel mineralized zones are characterized by gold-bearing
quartzdravitearsenopyrite veinlets, contained within quartzmicroclinebiotitedravitearsenopyritepyrrhotite auriferous replacement zones. Sulphide concentrations within the auriferous zones vary from 2% to 5%,
with the main sulphides being arsenopyrite, pyrrhotite and pyrite. Relationships between the nearby diorite and pegmatite intrusions and the gold mineralization event are still unknown.

The knowledge of the deposit setting and lithologies, and of the mineralization style and its structural and alteration controls, is sufficient to
support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation. Mineralization style and setting of the Project deposit is sufficiently well understood to support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation.

Exploration

Exploration in support of mine development has
included prospecting, gridding, mapping, ground induced polarization and magnetic surveys, a Hummingbird electromagnetic survey, grab and rock chip sampling, soil sampling, trench and channel sampling, core drilling, metallurgical test work, Mineral
Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates, baseline environmental, geotechnical and hydrological studies, and technical studies. The exploration programs completed to date are appropriate to the style of the deposits and prospects within the
Éléonore Mine. The exploration and research work supports the interpretations of genesis and mineralization, and the data obtained to date with exploration is reliable. There is considerable remaining exploration potential in the
vicinity of the current mining operations and the region.

The main focus of the exploration activities have been to advance the Roberto deposit to
a development decision, and therefore the greater Éléonore Mine operations area outside the area now incorporated in the mining licence has not been subject to significant exploration work in the last seven years. However, high-quality
exploration targets exist, both near the Roberto deposit and on other parts of the concession, and these warrant further investigation.

Drilling

As at June 30, 2016, a total of 934,629 metres has been drilled in 4,523 core holes on the property since 2004. Of these, a total of 351 holes
(105,635 metres) were completed by Osisko and 4,172 holes (828,994 metres) by Goldcorp.

All core holes were drilled on sections spaced
approximately 25 metres apart in most parts of the deposit. Drill hole spacing of 25 metres by 25 metres occurs over the bulk of the orebody to a depth of approximately 1,100 metres below surface. Below 1,100 metres, down to approximately 1,200
metres, a core hole spacing of 100 metres by 100 metres is usually observed. Only a few drill holes have been drilled below 1,200 metres. The deeper boreholes intersected the mineralized horizons at a depth of approximately 1,400 metres below
surface. For definition drilling, drill hole spacing is generally 12.5 metres by 12.5 metres inside the existing 25 metre drill spacing, as permitted by the mine development schedule.

Standardized logging forms and geological legends were developed for the project. Geotechnical logs were completed in sequence prior to geological
logging. Geological logging used standard procedures and collected information on mineralization, lithological breaks, alteration boundaries, and major structures. All drill core is photographed. Core recovery is acceptable for all drill programs.

Upon completion of a hole, surface drill hole collars were surveyed using a differential GPS instrument by a registered surveyor. Underground drill
holes are surveyed using a Leica TS15 robotized station.

Downhole surveys were carried out by the drill contractor for dip and deviation using a
Reflex instrument.

Drill data are typically verified prior to Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation by running a software program check.



- 40 -



---

Sample intervals were determined by the geological relationships observed in the core and vary between 0.3
metres and 1.25 metres. An attempt was made to terminate sample intervals at lithological and mineralization boundaries.

Specific gravity data were
collected by our workforce. The specific gravity database contains 11,923 specific gravity results that were determined on core samples. A specific gravity of 2.77 was used for all veins. The specific gravity database is currently sufficient to
provide a reliable assessment of the variability of the specific gravity across the deposit and across the various rock types.

The quantity and
quality of the lithological, geotechnical, collar, and down-hole survey data collected during the exploration and infill drill programs are sufficient to support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation.

Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification

Exploration and
infill core samples were analyzed by independent laboratories using industry-standard methods for gold analysis. A number of different laboratories have been used. Since April 2014, exploration and infill sample preparation and assay are performed
by Accurassay Laboratories Inc. in Rouyn-Noranda, Québec, which is accredited for ISO 17025 and independent of us. Our in-house laboratory started operation in February 2014 and begin to process muck,
chips and definition drilling samples at a rate of 180 samples per day. Overflow and other production samples were sent to ALS Laboratories (ALS). Between January 2007 and April 2014, ALS in
Val-dOr in Quebec was the primary laboratory, and holds ISO 17025 and 9001/2008 certifications and independent of us.

Metallurgical testwork has been done at a number of laboratories, but was primarily performed by SGS Laboratories. Sample preparation for samples that
support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation has followed a similar procedure for all Osisko and Goldcorp drill programs. The preparation procedure is in line with industry-standard methods for a clastic sediment-hosted
stockwork-disseminated gold deposit in an orogenic setting.

ALS sample preparation comprised drying and crushing to 70 to 90% passing 2 millimetres
and pulverizing to 85% passing 75 micrometres. Gold assays were performed by standard fire assay with an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish. For assay results equal or above 3.0 g/t gold, samples are
re-assayed with a gravimetric finish. ALS Chemex reports an upper limit of 10 g/t gold and a detection limit of 0.01 g/t gold for atomic absorption spectroscopy analyses. No other elements were routinely
requested for assay.

Sample preparation at the internal laboratory consists of crushing to 75% <10 mesh and pulverising to 85% passing 200 mesh.
Gold assays are performed by using a 30 g fire assay with a microwave plasmaatomic emission spectrometry finish. For assay results above 34.0 g/t gold, samples are re-assayed with a gravimetric finish.
The internal laboratory reports an upper limit of 34 g/t gold and a detection limit of 0.001 g/t gold for microwave plasmaatomic emission spectrometry analyses.

Accurassay sample preparation procedure consisted of drying and crushing to 85% <10 mesh, followed by pulverizing to 85% passing <200 mesh. Gold
assays are performed by standard fire assay with an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish. Accurassay reports an upper limit of 10 g/t gold and a detection limit of 0.01 g/t for atomic absorption spectroscopy analyses. No other elements are
routinely assayed.

The collected sample data adequately reflect deposit dimensions, true widths of mineralization, and the style of the deposits.

Osisko and Goldcorp maintained a QA/QC program for the project. This comprised the submission of analytical SRMs, duplicates and blanks. QA/QC
submission rates meet industry-accepted standards of insertion rates. No material sample biases were identified by the QA/QC programs.



- 41 -



---

The results of the QA/QC programs did not indicate any problems with the analytical programs. Accordingly,
we have concluded that the drill core gold analyses are acceptably accurate and precise to support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation.

Sample security has relied upon the fact that the samples were always attended or locked in the logging facility. Chain-of-custody procedures consisted of filling out sample submittal forms that were sent to the laboratory with sample shipments to make certain that all samples were received by the laboratory. Current
sample storage procedures and storage areas are consistent with industry standards.

The quality of the gold analytical data are sufficiently
reliable to support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation and that sample preparation, analysis, and security are generally performed in accordance with exploration best practices and industry standards.

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

Extensive
metallurgical studies were carried out on samples taken from the various Éléonore Mine ore zones. Most of the metallurgical testwork was completed during 20062010 as part of engineering studies. Additional paste backfill testing
was performed in 2013. Further testwork was conducted in 2015 to investigate the recovery issues experienced during ramp-up.

Assumed life-of-mine gold recovery assumptions are based on appropriate
testwork, and should average between 93% and 93.5% over the life-of-mine; however during the ramp-up period, we have
elected to use a weighted average metallurgical recovery of 92.5% for the current Mineral Reserve estimate.

Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates

The following table sets forth the gold Mineral Reserve estimations for the Éléonore Mine effective June 30, 2016:

Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)



|                  |  |                   |  |                         |  |                                     
|----------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Category          |  | Tonnes
(millions) |  | Grade
(grams per tonne) |  | Contained Metal
(millions of ounces)
|Proven            |  | 3.09              |  | 6.72                    |  | 0.67                                
|Probable          |  | 20.35             |  | 5.97                    |  | 3.90                                
|Proven + Probable |  | 23.44             |  | 6.07                    |  | 4.57                                



|(1) | The Mineral Reserves for the Éléonore Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the
supervision of Denis Fleury, P.Eng., Mining Engineer at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven and Probable, and are based on the CIM Definition
Standards. Proven Mineral Reserves include stockpile material.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Based on a gold price of $1,200per ounce, an economic function that includes variable operating costs and
metallurgical recovery of 92.5%, and a US$ exchange rate ofC$1.30.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Global cut-off grade of 3.17g/t. Total average US$ operating costs are
$104.00 per tonne (mining: $45.80 per tonne; processing: $31.20 per tonne; G&A: $27.00 per tonne).
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | An overall dilution of 10% is applied to the stopes using zero grade outside stope shapes.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Mineral Reserves take into account a 95% mining recovery.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------

Factors that can affect the Mineral Reserve estimates are: geological complexity causing under estimation of dilution; low recovery at the mill because
of a possible change in the hardness of the rock or mineralogical characteristics; more water infiltration from the surface or underground than expected; in situ stress in the rock; rock burst; deviations in drill holes necessary to support
production may cause more dilution; paste backfill strength; stope dilution and recovery factors that are based on assumptions that will be reviewed after mining experience; stope stability is also an important factor with some stopes having
considerable span and thickness; and changes in commodity price and exchange rate assumptions.



- 42 -



---

The following table sets forth the gold Mineral Resource estimations for the Éléonore Mine
effective June30, 2016:

Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)

(excluding Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves)



|                     |  |                   |  |             |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Category             |  | Tonnes
(millions) |  | Grade
(g/t) |  | Contained Metal
(millions of ounces)
|Measured             |  | 3.21              |  | 7.27        |  | 0.75                                
|Indicated            |  | 1.92              |  | 2.97        |  | 0.18                                
|Measured + Indicated |  | 5.14              |  | 5.66        |  | 0.93                                
|Inferred             |  | 9.73              |  | 7.52        |  | 2.35                                



|(1) | The Mineral Resources for the Éléonore Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the
supervision of Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Director of Exploration at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred, and are based
on the CIM Definition Standards.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | All Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of those Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves. Mineral
Resources are not known with the same degree of certainty as Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | A minimum true thickness of 2.5 metres was applied for all Mineral Resource estimates, using the grade of the adjacent
material when assayed or a value of zero when not assayed.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | A top cut varying from 30 g/t and 100 g/t (6.5 g/t for the dilution envelope) was applied to assay grades prior to
compositing grades for interpolation into model blocks using Ordinary Kriging and ID3 methods, and was based on 2 metre composites within a block model made of 5 metre long x 5 metre wide x 5 metre high blocks. Average specific gravity is 2.77 grams
per cubic metre.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Mineral Resources are reported using a 2.72 g/t gold cut-off grade, which is
based on assumptions of a $1,400 per ounce gold price, long-hole stoping underground mining methods, an exchange rate of C$/US$1.30, a life-of-mine metallurgical
recovery of 92.5%, and a total mining cost of $104.00 per tonne (comprising the following cost: mining: $45.80 per tonne; processing: $31.20 per tonne; G&A: $27.00 per tonne).
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------

Diamond drilling is underway on the Éléonore Mine to convert the actual and growing Inferred Mineral Resources to Indicated Mineral
Resources and if the program is proved successful and grade consistent with actual resource, it is possible that this work could increase the Mineral Reserves.

Key areas of uncertainty that may materially impact the Mineral Resource estimate include: geological complexity including folding and faulting of vein
material between drill hole intercepts; commodity price assumptions; metal recovery assumptions; hydrological constraints; and rock mechanics (geotechnical) constraints.

Mining Operations

Open stope mining (down-hole drilling)
and longitudinal retreat with consolidated backfill (paste backfill mixed with crushed waste rock) is utilized. A transverse open stope approach is used where the mineralized lenses are wider than 7 metres.

For mine scheduling purposes, the vertical extent of the orebody is subdivided into two parts: the upper part of the orebody located between 65 metres
and 650 metres below surface (Upper Mine), and the lower part of the orebody located between 650 metres and 1,190 metres below surface (Lower Mine). Dividing the orebody into two parts has accelerated the production
start-up.

Mining started from the 440 metre level and the 650 metre level. Production will be at the
nominal rate of 5,000 tonnes per day with four mining horizons starting on the 230 metre level, 440 metre level, 650 metre level and 800 metre level. At this stage, it is expected that all the ore and waste of horizon 1 (65 metre level to 230 metre
level) will be trucked to the surface; the ore and waste of horizons 2, 3 and 4 (230 metre level to 800 metre level) is hoisted up the production shaft.

Studies to increase and sustain the production rate will be conducted as more drilling information becomes available. Based on the current Mineral
Reserves, the planned operation has a 10-year mine life. The mine plan is under evaluation for including the mining of the zone above 55 metres below surface (crown pillar recovery project), however economics
do not currently support including this into mineral reserves.



- 43 -



---

The ramp is currently used as the air exhaust and will continue to do so when completed. The main
ventilation raise is the Gaumond shaft. From the shaft, the air is distributed into two internal ventilation raises, one located in the North Zone and one in the South Zone, each of which will bring fresh air to work places. Currently, ventilation
on demand is partly operational, and once completed it will help to reduce this preliminary estimation.

The permanent pumping system is designed to
be upgradable depending of the total water infiltration in the mine and also the mine plan. The system is designed to pump dirty water to the stations above and finally reach the surface. It consists of two main pumping stations (on the 400 metre
level and 650 metre level).

Stope widths vary between 2.5 metres and 20 metres. Stopes have a maximum length of 25 metres, and can reach a height
of 30 metres. Ground support consists of various combinations of rebar bolts, friction bolts, cables, screen and shotcrete depending on the rock quality and particular requirements of each heading.

Stopes are backfilled with paste fill. Unconsolidated backfill is used wherever is possible in order to avoid hoisting waste rock to the surface. The
current paste backfill mixture consists of 70% mill tailings, 25% fine sulphide concentrate, and between 4% to 7% binder. The sulphide tailing concentration can be up to 25% without having effect on the paste strength. Crushed waste is typically
added to the fill, so the percentage of the mill tailings decreases.

A fully-mechanized mining equipment fleet is used. Equipment includes scoop
trams, dump trucks, mine service and personnel vehicles, jumbo drills, bolting platforms, scissor lifts, land cruiser and forklifts.

There is
potential to extend the mine life and potentially sustain the 7,000 tonnes per day throughput rate if some or all of the Inferred Mineral Resources identified within the
life-of-mine production plan can be upgraded to higher confidence Mineral Resource categories, and eventually converted to Mineral Reserves. Mineralization remains open
at depth, with the deepest drill hole encountering mineralization at 1,400 metre depth; the current mine plan extends to 1,190 metre depth.

As part
of day-to-day operations, we continue to undertake reviews of the mine plan and consideration of alternatives to and variations within the plan. Alternative scenarios
and reviews may be based on ongoing or future mining considerations, evaluation of different potential input factors and assumptions, and corporate directives.

Processing and Recovery Operations

The mill is designed to
operate at 7,000 tonnes per day (2.55 million tonnes (Mt) per year) for 365 days per year. The comminution circuit consists of three stages of crushing followed by a single stage of ball mill grinding. The primary crusher
(jaw crusher), the secondary crusher (standard cone crusher) and the tertiary crushers are located at surface. Two short head cone crushers are needed to handle a 7,000 tonnes per day throughput. The fine-crushed ore is ground using a single-stage
ball mill connected in a closed circuit with cyclones.

A portion of the cyclones underflow is being directed to a gravity concentration circuit
consisting of a Knelson concentrator and an Acacia Reactor to recover liberated native gold.

Cyclone overflow (grinding circuit product) is
directed to the flotation cells to separate the sulphides into a low-mass sulphur concentrate. A thickener controls the density of the flotation tail slurry. Flotation tails are leached with cyanide for 36
hours while going through five leach tanks. Flotation concentrate is thickened and reground so that 80% (P80) is smaller than 10 micrometres using a fine grinding mill; then it is pre-aerated with oxygen for
18 hours prior to being leached with cyanide for 48 hours in five additional leach tanks. The gold in solution is recovered in carousel CIP circuits (one for each leach circuit).



- 44 -



---

The carbon from each CIP circuit is stripped as required in a Zadra process, and the gold recovered from
that final stage of the mineral processing circuit is poured into gold bars at regular intervals. The carbon is regenerated and returned to the CIP circuits for reuse.

The tails from each leaching circuit are detoxified in a conventional cyanide destruction circuit (SO2/Air), and then filtered. Finally, tailings can be
added to the paste backfill. Non-sulphides tailings are stored in a covered shed before being transported by hauling truck to the tailings management facility.

The tailings facilities are completely lined, and all water touching the tailings is collected and treated. The exposed surface of the tailings is kept
to a minimum, made possible by the choice of filtered tailings that allows for progressive reclamation. The tailings design envisages a storage capacity of 26 Mt.

Infrastructure, Permitting and Compliance Activities

The
James Bay region is surrounded by extensive hydroelectric facilities and associated infrastructure, the closest of which are the Sarcelle hydroelectric facility located 40 kilometres due west of the Éléonore Mine on the Opinaca
Reservoir and the Eastmain Dam located 70 kilometres to the south. A 120 kilovolt overhead incoming transmission line with two 120/25 kilovolt 40/53/66.6 MVA oil step-down transformers supports the mining operation.

For the Éléonore Mine operations, the major issues identified include the potential impacts on the environment, the proper management of
tailings and waste water, access (roads, airports), social acceptability and management of the post-reclamation site. We are of the opinion that these issues have been addressed and mitigated through a combination of baseline data collection,
appropriate engineering and project design studies, and public consultation. The Éléonore Mine operations currently hold all required permits to operate, including environmental permits.

The Éléonore Mine operations are located on traditional family territories of the Cree Nation of Wemindji, and within the Municipality of
EeyouIstheeJames Bay. The Opinagow Collaboration Agreement was signed in February 2011.

Capital and Operating Costs

Capital and operating cost estimates were prepared by our workforce. Capital cost estimates are based on a combination of the latest mine construction
data and budgetary numbers/quotes provided by suppliers, and experience with similar-sized operations. The total life-of-mine
capital estimate is $610 million, comprising $522 million of sustaining capital and $88 million of expansionary capital.



|             |  |                          |  | 
|------------ |  | ------------------------ |  | 
|Area         |  | Life-of-Mine
($
million) |  | 
|Sustaining   |  | $522                     | 
|Expansionary |  | $88                      | 
|Total        |  | $610                     | 



- 45 -



---

Operating cost estimates are based on the 2016 LOM budget, which includes estimates from first principles
for major items and allowances or estimates for minor costs. An average overall unit cost of $104.00 per tonne was estimated, comprising $31.20 per tonne for processing, including backfill and tailings treatment and transportation, $45.80 per tonne
for mining, and $27.00 per tonne for G&A. Exploration expenditures are not included in the operating costs.



|                  |  |                            |  | 
|----------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | 
|Area              |  | Life-of-Mine
($ per tonne) |  | 
|Process Plant     |  | $31.20                     | 
|Mining Operations |  | $45.80                     | 
|G&A               |  | $27.0                      | 
|Total             |  | $104.00                    | 

Exploration, Development and Production

The Gaumond exploration shaft had a nominal 4,000 tonnes per day ore-hoisting capacity, and a maximum hoisting
capacity of 7,000 tonnes per day (20 hours per day). We have completed a second shaft at Éléonore, which has a nominal 8,500 tonnes per day hoisting capacity (17 hours per day) and has been operational since 2016. The production shaft
is the primary ore and waste handling system.

The current plant is designed for an average throughput of 5,556 tonnes per day in 2017 with a ramp-up period continuing to reach full production capacity, which is commensurate with the current Mineral Reserves.

Exploration drilling in 2017 will continue to target structures in the lower mine and the southern portion of the ore body to convert Mineral Resources
to Mineral Reserves.

At the Éléonore Mine, our gold production guidance for 2017 is expected to be 315,000 ounces (+/- 5%). See
Risk Factors  Our financial projections rely on estimates of future production and estimates of future production may not be reliable, which could have a negative impact on our future cash flows, business, results of operations and
financial condition.

LATIN AMERICA

Our
properties in Latin America include the Peñasquito Mine, the Los Filos Mine, the Noche Buena Project, the Camino Rojo Project, the Marlin Mine, the Pueblo Viejo Mine (40% interest), the Cerro Negro Mine, the NuevaUnión Project (50%
interest), the Alumbrera Mine (37.5% interest) and the Cerro Blanco Project. The Peñasquito Mine, the Pueblo Viejo Mine and the Cerro Negro Mine, each described below, are considered to be material properties.

Peñasquito Mine, Mexico

The Peñasquito Mine,
wholly-owned by Goldcorp, is an open pit mining operation located in north-central Mexico with two separate process facilities, an oxide ore facility and a plant to process sulfide ore.

The scientific and technical information included in the following section has been derived from the technical report entitled Peñasquito
Polymetallic Operations, Zacatecas State, Mexico, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Peñasquito Report) dated effective December 31, 2015 prepared by Daniel Redmond, P.Geo.,
Dr. Sally Goodman, P.Geo., Dr. Guillermo Pareja, P.Geo., and Andre De Ruijter, P.Eng., each of whom is a qualified person under NI 43-101.

Property Description, Location and Access

The
Peñasquito Mine is wholly-owned by our subsidiary, Minera Peñasquito. Peñasquito is situated in the western half of the Concepción Del Oro district in the northeast corner of Zacatecas State, Mexico, approximately 200
kilometres northeast of the city of Zacatecas. The mine site is accessed via a turnoff from Highway 54 approximately 25 kilometres south of Concepción Del Oro. There is an airport on site.



- 46 -



---

The Peñasquito Mine is comprised of 19 mining concessions (45,753 hectares), held in the name of
Minera Peñasquito. Concessions were granted for durations of 50 years and a second 50-year term can be granted if the applicant has abided by all appropriate regulations and makes the application within
five years prior to the expiration date. Obligations which arise from the mining concessions include performance of assessment work, payment of mining taxes and compliance with environmental laws. Duty payments for the concessions have been made as
required. Minimum expenditures, pursuant to Mexican regulations, may be substituted for sales of minerals from the mine for an equivalent amount. We hold additional tenure in the greater Peñasquito Mine area (within about 200 to 300
kilometres of the Peñasquito Mine infrastructure), which is under application, is granted, or is part of joint ventures with third parties.

Mining concessions give the holder the right to mine within the concession boundary, sell the mining product, dispose of waste material generated by
mining activities within the lease boundary, and have access easements. Surface rights in the vicinity of the Chile Colorado and Peñasco open pits are held by four ejidos, as well as certain private owners. We have signed current land use
agreements with all of the ejidos and the relevant private owners. Under current agreements with the ejidos, payments are made to the ejidos on an annual basis, in addition to certain upfront payments that have already been made.

A 2% net smelter return royalty is payable to Royal Gold, Inc. on production from both the Peñasco and Chile Colorado pits which constitute the
Peñasquito Mine. Effective January 1, 2014, the Mexican Government passed a mining royalty that consists of a 7.5% mining royalty imposed on earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). There is also an
additional 0.5% royalty on precious metals revenue (applicable to precious metals mining companies) effective January 1, 2014. In 2007, Silver Wheaton Corp. (Silver Wheaton) acquired 25% of the silver produced by the
Peñasquito Mine over the life-of mine for an upfront cash payment of $485 million and a per ounce cash payment of the lesser of $3.90 and the prevailing market price (subject to an inflationary
adjustment commencing in 2011), for silver delivered under the contract.

Environmental liabilities are limited to those that would be expected to
be associated with a polymetallic mine, where productions occurs from open pit sources, and where disturbance includes mining operations, roads, site infrastructure, heap leach, and waste and tailings disposal facilities. A closure and reclamation
plan has been prepared for the mine site.We hold the appropriate permits under local, state and federal laws to allow for mining operations.

History

The earliest recorded work in the Peñasquito Mine consists of excavation of a shallow shaft and completion of two drill holes in the
1950s. Kennecott Canada Explorations Inc. through its Mexican subsidiary, Minera Kennecott S.A. de C.V. (Kennecott), acquired initial title to the Peñasquito Mine and commenced exploration in 1994. Regional geochemical and
geophysical surveys were undertaken in the period 1994 to 1997. This work led to the early discovery of two large mineralized diatreme breccia bodies, the Outcrop (Peñasco) and Azul Breccias.

In 1998, Western Copper Holdings Ltd. (Western Copper) acquired a 100% interest in the Peñasquito Mine from Kennecott.
Exploration efforts were focused on the Chile Colorado zone and the Azul Breccia pipe targets. Western Copper optioned the property to Minera Hochschild S.A. (Hochschild) in 2000. Hochschild completed core drilling into the Chile
Colorado anomaly, but subsequently returned the property to Western Copper. From 2002 to 2009, Western Copper completed additional core and reverse circulation drill holes and undertook a scoping-level study, a
pre-feasibility study, and a feasibility study in 2003, 2004, and 2005 respectively. The feasibility study was updated in 2006. Under the assumptions in the studies, the Peñasquito Mine returned
positive economics. In 2003, Western Copper underwent a name change to Western Silver Corporation (Western Silver). Glamis acquired Western Silver in May 2006, and we subsequently acquired the combined company in November 2006.

During 2005, a drill rig was used to perform geotechnical field investigations to support the design of the heap leach facility, waste rock piles,
tailings impoundment and process plant. Standard penetration tests



- 47 -



---

were performed. Construction in the Peñasquito Mine commenced in 2007. In October 2009, the first lead and zinc concentrates were produced and concentrate shipment to smelters commenced
with first sales recorded in November 2009.

Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit Types

Deposits currently mined within the Peñasquito Mine operations are considered to be examples of breccia pipe deposits developed as a result of
intrusion-related hydrothermal activity.

The regional geology of the operations area is dominated by Mesozoic sedimentary rocks, which are intruded
by Tertiary stocks of intermediate composition (granodiorite and quartz monzonite), and overlain by Tertiary terrestrial sediments and Quaternary alluvium. The Mesozoic sedimentary rocks comprise a >2.5 kilometres thick series of marine sediments
deposited during the Jurassic and Cretaceous Periods with a 2,000 metre thick sequence of carbonaceous and calcareous turbiditic siltstones and interbedded sandstones underlain by a 1,500 metre to 2,000 metre thick limestone sequence.

Large granodiorite stocks are interpreted to underlie large portions of the mineralized areas within the Concepción Del Oro District, including
Peñasquito. Slightly younger quartzfeldspar porphyries, quartz monzonite porphyries, and other feldspar-phyric intrusions occurring as dikes, sills, and stocks cut the sedimentary units. The intrusions are interpreted to have been
emplaced from the late Eocene to mid-Oligocene.

The two diatreme pipes,
Peñasco and Brecha Azul, are the principal hosts for goldsilverzinclead mineralization at Peñasquito. The pipes flare upward, and are filled with breccia clasts in a milled matrix of similar lithological composition.
The larger diatreme, Peñasco, has a diameter of 900 metres by 800 metres immediately beneath surface alluvial cover. The second, and smaller, diatreme, Brecha Azul, is about 500 metres in diameter immediately below alluvium. The diatremes are
surrounded by coalesced halos of lower grade, disseminated sphalerite, galena, and sulphosalts containing silver and gold.

Both of the breccia
pipes lie within a hydrothermal alteration shell consisting of a central sericitepyritequartz (phyllic) alteration assemblage, surrounding sericitepyritequartzcalcite assemblage, and peripheral calcitepyrite
alteration halo.

Manto-style sulphide replacements of carbonate strata have been discovered beneath the clastic-hosted disseminated sulphide zones,
and adjacent to the diatreme pipes. The mantos consist of semi-massive to massive sulphide replacements of sub-horizontal limestone beds, as well as cross-cutting chimney-style, steeply dipping, fracture and
breccias zones filled with high concentrations of sulphides.

Garnet skarn-hosted polymetallic mineralization has been identified at depth between
the Peñasco and Brecha Azul diatremes. The skarn has horizontal dimensions of approximately 1,000 metres by 1,200 metres and is open at depth.

Exploration

Work undertaken included reconnaissance
geological inspections, regional-scale geochemical and geophysical surveys (including gravity, controlled source audio frequency magnetollurics, reconnaissance induced polarization, scaler induced polarization, airborne radiometrics, magnetics and
ground magnetics), rotary air blast, reverse circulation and core drilling.

The exploration programs completed to date are appropriate to the style
of the deposits and prospects within the Peñasquito Mine and support the genetic and geological interpretations.



- 48 -



---

Drilling

Drilling completed on the Peñasquito Mine area for the period 1994 to 2016 comprised 1,663 drill holes (822,961 metres). Drilling has focused on
the exploration and delineation of three principal areas: the Chile Colorado Zone, the Brecha Azul Zone and the Peñasco Zone.

In 2016, in-fill drilling at Peñasquito included 70 holes (21,105 metres) while near-mine exploration and condemnation drilling included 33 holes (15,811 metres).

Drill hole spacing is generally on 50 metre sections in the main deposits with tighter spacing for infill drilling in the Peñasco pit, spreading
out to 400 metre spaced sections in the condemnation zones. Drill spacing is wider again in the areas outside the conceptual pit outlines used to constrain Mineral Resources. Drilling covers an area approximately 11 kilometres eastwest by 7
kilometres northsouth with the majority of drill holes concentrated in an area 2.1 kilometres eastwest by 2.8 kilometres northsouth.

Drill logs record deposit-specific information, including lithologies, breccia type, fracture frequency and orientation, oxidation, sulphide
mineralization type and intensity, and alteration type and intensity. From mid-2013, logs have been recorded electronically and are uploaded directly to the project database.

Drill traces were down-hole surveyed using a single shot, through the bit, survey instrument. All drill holes have been down-hole surveyed except 51
Western Silver reverse circulation drill holes and 11 of the 71 Kennecott drill holes. Use of a gyroscopic survey instrument began in 2012 when Silver State Survey was contracted. In the first 800 metres of any drill hole, Silver State Survey takes
a measurement at 50 metre intervals and at the end of the drill hole.

The quantity and quality of the lithological, geotechnical, collar, and
down-hole survey data collected during our exploration and infill drill programs are sufficient to support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation.

Geotechnical Drilling

Geotechnical drilling in support of
infrastructure locations were completed as follows:



| |  | Major Drilling Co., (Major): 2004: eight core holes completed in the area of the planned Chile Colorado pit and three
core holes in the planned Peñasco pit area for a total 11 core holes (4,126 metres). Core holes were oriented at an angle of 60o to the horizontal and were sited to intersect the November 2005 design basis pit wall one-third of the ultimate wall height above the base of the final pit level. Core orientation was accomplished using two independent methods: clay impression and a mechanical down-hole system referred to as
Corientor. Field point load tests were completed for each core run to estimate the unconfined compressive strength of the intact rock;
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Estudios Especializados de Mecánica de Suelos, S.A. de C.V.: 2005: geotechnical field investigations to support
the design of the heap leach facility, waste rock piles, tailings impoundment and process plant. Standard penetration tests were performed;
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Adviser Drilling, S.A. de C.V.: 2010: oriented core program with seven holes (3,014.17 metres) completed to provide
information on the bedding orientations within the area planned for the Chile Colorado pit and identify structures that could affect the bench stability; and
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Boart Longyear Drilling Services-Mexico and BDW: 2013: seven hole program (1,856.25 metres), which focused on obtaining
information on the bedding orientations in the north of the Peñasco pit. The drill holes were sited to provide geotechnical information for pit phase designs and for support of potential modification of pit wall slope angles in selected pit
sectors. A total of 68 laboratory triaxial tests of intact rocks were performed and 52 direct shear tests to estimate the
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 49 -



---

| | unconfined strength of the intact rock. The rock quality designation model was updated with the recent drill information, and a total of 1,211 holes were used. A total of 1,348 holes and 13
geomechanical cells were used to construct a model of bedding orientation in the Caracol Formation
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Metallurgical Drilling

Metallurgical drilling was first performed in 20032006, with 12 holes (3,853 metres) completed. Holes averaged 310 metres in depth. An additional
29 core holes were drilled in 20062012 (15,537 metres), which were typically 550 metres long. During 2013, 18 holes (9,156 metres) were completed, averaging 510 metres in length.There was no additional metallurgical drilling in
2016.

Geological and Geotechnical Logging

Logging of
reverse circulation drill cuttings and core utilized standard logging procedures. Initial logging utilized paper forms, with data hand-entered into a database from the form. Logs recorded lithologies, breccia type, fracture frequency and
orientation, oxidation, sulphide mineralization type and intensity, and alteration type and intensity.

In July 2013, digital logging was
implemented. Data are logged directly into acQuire using custom forms. Logs are stored on the mine server in an exploration database. Information now recorded includes lithology, alteration, minerals, structural features, oxidation description, and
vein types.

Core was photographed; core photographs are retained on the mine data server. Video was recorded from drill collar to toe; these
digital files are stored on hard discs.

Geotechnical logging for pit design purposes was typically completed at 3 metre intervals, and recorded on
CDs. For site location purposes, geotechnical logging included sample descriptions, sample numbers and visual classifications based on the united soil classification system. From 2010 onwards, all geotechnical logging has been stored in an acQuire
database.

Collar Surveys

All drill hole collars are
identified with a concrete monument, allowing all drill holes to be identified at a later date. The monument is placed directly over the collar on completion of each drill hole.

Prior to 2001, drill holes were located using chain-and-compass methods.
From 2002 onwards, collar surveys have been performed by a qualified surveyor. Since preparation for mining operations commenced in 2007, all surveys have been performed using differential GPS instruments. The mine currently uses Trimble R-6 GPS instruments.

Deposit Drilling

Drilling is normally perpendicular to the strike of the mineralization. Depending on the dip of the drill hole, and the dip of the mineralization, drill
intercept widths are typically greater than true widths.

Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification

Independent sample preparation and analytical laboratories used during the exploration, development and operational core drill programs on the project
include ALS Chemex, and Bondar Clegg (absorbed into ALS Chemex in 2001). The umpire (check) laboratories are Acme Laboratories in Vancouver, and SGS Mexico. Laboratories are certified and independent of Goldcorp. The
run-of-mine samples are assayed in an on-site mine laboratory that is not accredited. Sample collection and handling of core was
done in accordance with industry standard practices, with procedures to limit sample losses and sampling biases. Core recovery for the Peñasquito drilling programs averaged 97%. Reverse circulation drill cuttings were



- 50 -



---

sampled at intervals of 2 metres. The standard core sample interval is 2 metres. Some samples are limited to geological boundaries and are less than 2 metres in length.

The sampling has been undertaken over a sufficient area to determine deposit limits, and the data collected adequately reflects deposit dimensions, true
widths of mineralization, and the style of the deposits. The samples are representative of the mineralization, and respect the geology of the deposits.

The sample preparation method typically consists of drying, pulverizing and splitting to generate a 30 gram pulp for assay. Prior to 2003, the
pulverization standard was 85% passing 75 micrometres; after 2003, samples were pulverized to a minimum of 85% passing 200 mesh. Standard fire assay procedures are used for analysis of gold. Inductively-coupled plasma analyses are used for silver,
lead, zinc and deleterious elements.

QA/QC measures for our programs include submission of standard reference materials and blanks, and re-assay of a proportion of the samples.

Entry of information into databases has utilized a variety of techniques
and procedures to check the integrity of the data entered. Geological data from early drill programs were entered into spreadsheets in a single pass.

All drill data from 2007 to July 2013 was entered from paper logging forms into Excel files before being imported into acQuire. Since July 2013, logging
and recording of other drill hole data by geologists and technicians has been entered directly into acQuire on laptop computers, with the data subsequently imported into the main database.

Assays received electronically from the laboratories are imported directly into the database. Analytical certificates received since 2010 have been
stored in the database and were validated via the acQuire software.

Data are verified on entry to the database by means of built-in program triggers within the mining software. Checks are performed on surveys, collar co-ordinates, lithology data, and assay data.

The quality of the analytical data is sufficiently reliable to support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation and sample preparation, analysis,
and security are generally performed in accordance with exploration best practices and industry standards.

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

Mineralogical studies have been performed in order to increase the knowledge of the different ore types in the mine targeted to ensure the best possible
treatment for each ore category and maximize the recovery. Metallurgical testwork focused on recovery of the key elements, lead and zinc, with co-recovery of gold and silver.

Various testwork programs have investigated comminution, flotation, heavy media separation, flowsheet variability schemes, concentrate filtration,
dewatering, and regrind tests, modal and liberation analyses, and bottle roll and column cyanide leach extraction tests. Programs were performed and which were sufficient to establish the optimal processing routes for oxide and sulphide ores, and
supported estimation of recovery factors for the various ore types. A number of ore types have been identified that are classed as special because of their specific chemical characteristics, and include transitional, low-lead, high-copper and high-carbon types. The proposed Pyrite Project has also investigated the metallurgical responses to treatment for additional gold and silver recovery from the zinc flotation tailings.

Over the life of mine gold and silver recovery from the oxide heap leach has stabilised. Recovery from the heap leach is currently fixed at about 57%
for gold and 24% for silver in the LOM plan.



- 51 -



---

The mineralogical complexity of the Peñasquito Mine ore makes the development of mill processing
models difficult as eight elements (gold, silver, lead, zinc, copper, iron, arsenic and antimony) are tracked through the process, and the models need to be robust enough to allow for changes in mineralogy and plant operations while giving
reasonable predictions of concentrate quality and tonnage. Metallurgical models were updated in 2015 for the second time from the feasibility study assumptions. Based on the present LOM, which assumes the construction of the pyrite leach plant and
the heap leach pad, the following average overall metal recoveries are anticipated: lead, 78.5%; zinc, 82.1%; gold, 71.5%; and silver, 83.1%.

There
are currently no metallurgical models for the high-carbon ores. A method to identify and characterise this ore type needs to be developed so models can be generated for use in the future. Determination of future processing methods that may allow for
the processing of the high-carbon and high-copper ores represent project upside potential.

The processing plant, in particular the flotation
portion of the circuit, is not able to separate the copper-bearing minerals from the lead-bearing minerals, so when present the sulphosalts report (primarily) to the lead concentrate. The marketing contracts are structured to allow for small
percentages of these deleterious elements to be incorporated into the final product, with any exceedances then incurring nominal penalties. Historically, due to the relative small proportion of concentrate bearing high levels of deleterious
elements, the marketing group has been able to sufficiently blend the majority of the deleterious elements such that little or no financial impact has resulted.

Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates

The following
table sets forth the Mineral Reserve estimation for the Peñasquito Mine effective June 30, 2016:

Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)

|                               |  |                   |  |                   |        |  |                          |  |      |                        |  |  |          |  |  |          |      |  |                             |  |      |                           |  |  |                         |  |  |                             |        |  |  |  |          |  |  |  |          | 
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | ------------------------ |  | ---- | ---------------------- |  |  | -------- |  |  | -------- | ---- |  | --------------------------- |  | ---- | ------------------------- |  |  | ----------------------- |  |  | --------------------------- | ------ |  |  |  | -------- |  |  |  | -------- | 
|                               |  |                   |  |                   |        |  | Grade                    |  |      | Contained Metal        | 
|                               |  |                   |  |                   |        |  |                          |  |      |                       
|Deposit                        |  | Category          |  | Tonnes
(millions) |        |  | Gold
(grams  per  tonne) |  |      | Silver
(gramspertonne) |  |  | Lead
(%) |  |  | Zinc
(%) |      |  | Gold
(millions  of  ounces) |  |      | Silver
(millionsofounces) |  |  | Lead
(millionsofpounds) |  |  | Zinc
(millions  of  pounds) |       
|                               |  |                   |  |                   |        |  |                          |  |      |                       
|Peñasquito Mine Mill (8)       |  | Proven            |  |                   | 393.84 |  |                          |  | 0.58 |                        |  |  | 32.75    |  |  |          | 0.32 |  |                             |  | 0.78 |                           |  |  | 7.38                    |  |  |                             | 414.73 |  |  |  | 2,747.11 |  |  |  | 6,786.68 | 
|                               |  | Probable          |  |                   | 195.16 |  |                          |  | 0.40 |                        |  |  | 24.60    |  |  |          | 0.22 |  |                             |  | 0.50 |                           |  |  | 2.50                    |  |  |                             | 154.34 |  |  |  | 936.74   |  |  |  | 2,140.56 | 
|                               |  | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 589.00 |  |                          |  | 0.52 |                        |  |  | 30.05    |  |  |          | 0.28 |  |                             |  | 0.69 |                           |  |  | 9.89                    |  |  |                             | 569.07 |  |  |  | 3,683.84 |  |  |  | 8,927.24 | 
|                               |  |                   |  |                   |        |  |                          |  |      |                       
|Peñasquito Mine Heap Leach (9) |  | Proven            |  |                   | 8.42   |  |                          |  | 0.40 |                        |  |  | 22.99    |  |  |          |     |  |                             |  |     |                           |  |  | 0.11                    |  |  |                             | 6.22   |  |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 
|                               |  | Probable          |  |                   | 2.06   |  |                          |  | 0.39 |                        |  |  | 20.83    |  |  |          |     |  |                             |  |     |                           |  |  | 0.03                    |  |  |                             | 1.38   |  |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 
|                               |  | Proven + Probable |  |                   | 10.47  |  |                          |  | 0.40 |                        |  |  | 22.56    |  |  |          |     |  |                             |  |     |                           |  |  | 0.13                    |  |  |                             | 7.60   |  |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 



|(1) | The Mineral Reserves for the Peñasquito Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision
of Dan Redmond, P.Geo., Director, Mine Planning & Reserves at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven and Probable, and are based on the CIM Definition Standards.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Based on a gold price of $1,200 per ounce, a silver price of $18.00 per ounce, a lead price of $0.90 per pound and a zinc
price of $0.95per pound; and an economic function that includes variable operating costs and metallurgical recoveries.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Prior to the pyrite leach circuit, the estimated recovery rate for the Peñasquito Mill averages 59.8% for gold,
75.8% for silver, 78.5% for lead and 82.1% for zinc. After the pyrite leach circuit, the estimated recovery rate for the Peñasquito Mill averages 71.8% for gold and 84.7% for silver, with other metal recoveries unchanged. A pyrite leach gold
recovery circuit is assumed to be operational late 2018. Recovery relationships of the ore types are very complex and can vary considerably from these life of mine averages.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | The estimated metallurgical recovery rate for the Peñasquito Mine (Heap Leach) is 59.4% for gold and 25.2% for
silver.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Cut-off grade is based on generating positive net smelter return on a block-by-block basis applying all revenue and associated costs. The incremental cost used for milled ore prior to pyrite leach process is $6.92 per tonne, after the pyrite
leach process is $8.65 per tonne, and for leach ore is $4.90 per tonne. Administrative and sustaining capital costs total $2.12 per tonne. Other factors considered are product freight to market costs, smelter costs (including penalties) and
royalties.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 52 -



---

|(7) | A forward sales contract for 25% of silver production exists with Silver Wheaton.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(8) | Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 10,000 tonnes; grades are rounded to two decimal places.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(9) | Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent differences between tonnes, grade and contained metal
content.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(10) | Tonnage and grade measurements are in metric units. Contained gold and silver ounces are reported as troy ounces.
Contained lead and zinc pounds are Imperial pound units.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Risk factors that can affect the Mineral Reserve estimates are: metal
prices and exchange rate assumptions; mining, process and operating and capital cost assumptions; availability of water sufficient to support the mine design and process plant throughput rate assumptions; deleterious substances in mineralization
that may affect metallurgical recovery rates, meeting capital project timelines, geotechnical and hydrogeological assumptions; social licence to operate being maintained; and any additional modifications to the proposed changes to the taxation and
royalty regime.

To support declaration of Mineral Reserves, we prepare an economic analysis to confirm that the economics based on the Mineral
Reserves over the mine life repays life-of-mine operating and capital costs. The mine was evaluated on an after-tax free cash
flow basis.

The following table sets forth the Mineral Resource estimations for the Peñasquito Mine effective June 30, 2016:

Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)

(excluding Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves)

|                           |  |                      |  |                   |        |  |                          |  |      |                        |  |  |          |  |  |          |      |  |                             |  |      |                           |  |  |                         |  |  |                             |        |  |  |  |          |  |  |  |          | 
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | ------------------------ |  | ---- | ---------------------- |  |  | -------- |  |  | -------- | ---- |  | --------------------------- |  | ---- | ------------------------- |  |  | ----------------------- |  |  | --------------------------- | ------ |  |  |  | -------- |  |  |  | -------- | 
|                           |  |                      |  |                   |        |  | Grade                    |  |      | Contained Metal        | 
|                           |  |                      |  |                   |        |  |                          |  |      |                       
|Deposit                    |  | Category             |  | Tonnes
(millions) |        |  | Gold
(grams  per  tonne) |  |      | Silver
(gramspertonne) |  |  | Lead
(%) |  |  | Zinc
(%) |      |  | Gold
(millions  of  ounces) |  |      | Silver
(millionsofounces) |  |  | Lead
(millionsofpounds) |  |  | Zinc
(millions  of  pounds) |       
|                           |  |                      |  |                   |        |  |                          |  |      |                       
|Peñasquito Mine Mill       |  | Measured             |  |                   | 118.40 |  |                          |  | 0.28 |                        |  |  | 27.24    |  |  |          | 0.25 |  |                             |  | 0.60 |                           |  |  | 1.05                    |  |  |                             | 103.68 |  |  |  | 659.54   |  |  |  | 1,563.20 | 
|                           |  | Indicated            |  |                   | 185.08 |  |                          |  | 0.27 |                        |  |  | 22.76    |  |  |          | 0.20 |  |                             |  | 0.50 |                           |  |  | 1.60                    |  |  |                             | 135.46 |  |  |  | 809.57   |  |  |  | 2,037.09 | 
|                           |  | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 303.49 |  |                          |  | 0.27 |                        |  |  | 24.51    |  |  |          | 0.22 |  |                             |  | 0.54 |                           |  |  | 2.66                    |  |  |                             | 239.14 |  |  |  | 1,469.11 |  |  |  | 3,600.29 | 
|                           |  | Inferred             |  |                   | 28.22  |  |                          |  | 0.30 |                        |  |  | 19.37    |  |  |          | 0.21 |  |                             |  | 0.31 |                           |  |  | 0.27                    |  |  |                             | 17.58  |  |  |  | 127.63   |  |  |  | 193.00   | 
|                           |  |                      |  |                   |        |  |                          |  |      |                       
|Peñasquito Mine Heap Leach |  | Measured             |  |                   | 7.33   |  |                          |  | 0.21 |                        |  |  | 32.14    |  |  |          |     |  |                             |  |     |                           |  |  | 0.05                    |  |  |                             | 7.57   |  |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 
|                           |  | Indicated            |  |                   | 15.23  |  |                          |  | 0.20 |                        |  |  | 23.60    |  |  |          |     |  |                             |  |     |                           |  |  | 0.10                    |  |  |                             | 11.55  |  |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 
|                           |  | Measured + Indicated |  |                   | 22.56  |  |                          |  | 0.21 |                        |  |  | 26.38    |  |  |          |     |  |                             |  |     |                           |  |  | 0.15                    |  |  |                             | 19.13  |  |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 
|                           |  | Inferred             |  |                   | 0.04   |  |                          |  | 0.01 |                        |  |  | 5.02     |  |  |          |     |  |                             |  |     |                           |  |  | 0.00                    |  |  |                             | 0.01   |  |  |  |         |  |  |  |         | 



|(1) | The Mineral Resources for the Peñasquito Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision
of Guillermo Pareja, P.Geo., Manager of Mineral Resources at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred, and are based on the CIM
Definition Standards.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | All Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of those Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Based on commodity prices of $1,400 per ounce gold, $20.00 per ounce silver, $1.00 per pound lead and $1.00 per pound of
zinc.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | The estimated metallurgical recovery rate for the Peñasquito Mill is assumed similar to Mineral Reserves.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Cut-off grade determination methodology is similar to Mineral Reserves, except
metal pricing as noted.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 10,000 tonnes; grades are rounded to two decimal places.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(8) | Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and
contained metal content.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(9) | Tonnage and grade measurements are in metric units. Contained gold and silver ounces are reported as troy ounces.
Contained lead and zinc pounds are Imperial pound units.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Risk factors that can affect the Mineral Resource estimates are: metal
prices and exchange rate assumptions; assumptions which are used in the Lerchs-Grossman shell constraining Mineral Resources, including mining, processing and general and administrative costs; metal recoveries; geotechnical and hydrogeological
assumptions; and assumptions that the operation will maintain the social licence to operate.



- 53 -



---

Mining Operations

Peñasquito Mine is a conventional, large scale, truck-and-shovel
open pit mining operation. For 2017, the operation is scheduled to mine 39.1 million tonnes of ore, with total material movement of 189 million tonnes. The open pit operations will progress at a nominal annual mining rate of 225 Mt/year
until the end 2023, after which it continues to decline at a significant rate as the stripping ratios of ore to waste decrease.

The Mineral Reserve
estimate for the operations is based on Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. A four-step process is used to estimate the Mineral Reserves. The Peñasquito Mine contained metal block model is interpolated with a series of software scripts
in which a net smelter return value is calculated for each block, based on recovery and marketing assumptions.

The Peñasquito Mine net
smelter return block model then undergoes a process of pit optimization where computer software optimizes the potential future financial return for a number of intermediate pit shells, and defines the ultimate pit size and shape for each
of the two deposits. The ultimate pit shell offering the best economic results is selected, based on the defined parameters while respecting geotechnical limitations.

With the ultimate pit limits defined, practical design parameters are completed within a mine design software package. This process results in a series
of minable cutbacks that together form the ultimate pit design for the deposit.

A series of potential production schedules are produced that are
based on the practical sequencing of each cut-back, the mining equipment available, and operational limitations such as production rates, haulage distance and mill throughput capacity. From this process, which
in most cases is iterative, a practical LOM production schedule is developed that tries to maximize the metal production and minimize operating and capital costs and defines the annual mining, milling and metal production schedules.

The current mine plan is based on the 2016 Mineral Reserve estimate, and will produce oxide and sulphide material to be processed through the existing
heap leach facility and sulphide plant respectively over a 14-year mine life (20172031).

Dilution is
accounted for in block models by ensuring the models have the appropriate change of support to produce a gradetonnage curve that reflects the expected mining selectivity. Block models also incorporate anticipated contact dilution through the
interpolation plan that utilizes both mineralization and waste samples within interpolation domains. Accordingly, no further dilution factors are needed to reflect the appropriate grade and tonnage distributions. Because the same models are used for
both Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, dilution is incorporated in both estimates. Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are reported at 100% of the block model.

An ore stockpiling strategy is practiced. The mine plan considers the value of the blocks mined on a continuous basis combined with the expected
concentrates quality. From time to time ore material with a lower net smelter return value will be stockpiled to bring forward the processing of higher-value ore earlier in the LOM. In some instances, the ore is segregated into stockpiles of known
composition to allow for blending known quantities of material at the stockpile as required by the mill/customer. Stockpiling at Peñasquito Mine also allows for forward planning for ore quality to ensure optimal mill performance and
consistent gold production to match, within the normal bounds of expected variability within the mine plan.

Processing and Recovery Operations

The Peñasquito Mine consists of a leach facility that processes a nominal 25,000 tonnes per day of oxide ore and a sulphide plant that can
processes a nameplate 130,000 tonnes per day of sulphide ore. Mine construction commenced in 2007. Ore placement on the heap leach pad began in February 2008. On April 8, 2008, ore leaching was initiated and the first gold pour occurred on
May 10, 2008. In October



- 54 -



---

2009, the first lead and zinc concentrates were produced and concentrate shipment to smelters commenced with first sales recorded in November 2009.

For the milling throughput, the LOM plan assumes a nominal rate of 45.1 Mt per year until the end of 2028 and the first quarter of 2029, and the heap
leach pad will be stacked with incremental oxide ore as it is mined.

Run-of-mine oxide ore is delivered to the heap leach pile from the mine
by haul trucks. Lime is added to the ore prior to the addition of the ore to the pad. Ore is placed in ten metre lifts and leached with cyanide solution. Pregnant leach solution is clarified, filtered, and
de-aerated, then treated with zinc dust to precipitate the precious metals. The precipitated metals are subsequently pressure filtered, and the filter cake smelted to produce doré.

For 2016, a total of 1,106,000 metric tonnes was heap leached for a total of 15,000 ounces of gold and 275,000 ounces of silver produced.

Sulphide Ore

Run-of-mine sulphide ore is delivered to the crusher dump pocket from the mine by 290 tonne rear-dumphaul trucks. The crushing circuit is designed to process up to 148,000 tonnes per day of run-of-mine sulphide ore to 80% passing 159 millimetres. The crushing facility initially consisted of a gyratory crusher capable of operating at 92% utilization on a 24-hour-per-day,
365-days-per-year basis.

For 2016, a total of 34,112,000 metric tonnes of ore was processed through the sulphide plant facility, for a total of 450,000 ounces of gold,
17,628,000 ounces of silver, 262,900,000 pounds of zinc, and 173,900,000 pounds of lead produced (payable metal). Metallurgical recoveries averaged 63% for gold, 79% for silver, 77% for zinc, and 72% for lead.

Metallurgical Enhancement Process

The feasibility study for
the Metallurgical Enhancement Process (MEP), which consists of the Concentrate Enrichment Process (CEP) and Pyrite Leach Plant (PLP), was completed during the fourth quarter of 2015. The
results determined that the CEP component of the MEP no longer met our required rate of return due to improved fundamentals in the concentrate smelting market. An investment decision on PLP was approved in 2016, and is expected to be completed in
2019. The PLP is expected to increase overall gold and silver recovery by treating the zinc tailings before discharge to the tailings storage facility. The PLP is expected to provide annual incremental production of
100,000-140,000 gold ounces and approximately 4-6 million silver ounces. As part of the PLP a carbon pre-flotation facility
is being constructed, anticipated to be completed in the second quarter of 2018.

Markets/Contracts

We have an operative refining agreement with Met Mex Peñoles for refining of doré produced from the Peñasquito Mine. Our bullion is
sold on the spot market by our marketing experts retained in-house. The terms contained within the sales contracts are typical and consistent with standard industry practice, and are similar to contracts for
the supply of doré elsewhere in the world. A portion of the silver production is forward-sold to Silver Wheaton (25%).

The markets for the
lead and zinc concentrates from the Peñasquito Mine are worldwide with smelters located in Mexico, Canada, United States, Asia and Europe. Metals prices are quoted for lead and zinc on the London Metals Exchange and for gold and silver by the
London Bullion Market Association. The metal payable terms and smelter treatment and refining charges for both lead and zinc concentrate represent typical terms for the market and qualities produced by the Peñasquito Mine. As of
December 31, 2016, Peñasquito Mine has zero hedges in place for 2017 in relation to its concentrate sales.



- 55 -



---

Infrastructure, Permitting and Compliance Activities

As of August 2015, Peñasquito Mine uses power sourced from a subsidiary of InterGen Servicios Mexico who operates a 220 megawatt gas-fired combined cycle power plant. The annual power consumption ranges from 130145 megawatts per day, with the majority (>85%) of the consumption in the processing facility.

Process and potable water for the Peñasquito Mine is sourced from the Torres-Vergel well field located six kilometres west of the
Peñasquito Mine and an additional groundwater source within the Cedros basin named the Northern Well Field, and its construction completed in 2016.

There is sufficient suitable land available within our mineral tenure for tailings disposal, mine waste disposal, and mining-related infrastructure,
such as the open pit, process plant, workshops and offices. A skilled labour force is available in the region where the Peñasquito Mine is located and in the surrounding mining areas of Mexico. Accommodation comprises a 1,900-bed camp with full dining, laundry and recreational facilities. Fuel and supplies are sourced from nearby regional centres such as Monterrey, Monclova, Saltillo and Zacatecas and imports from the United States
via Laredo.

Various baseline studies, with respect to water, air, noise, wildlife, forest resources and waste and materials have been completed.
Environmental permits are required by various Mexican Federal, state and municipal agencies, and are in place for project operations. The initial project environmental impact assessment was authorized on December 18, 2006. This initial document
was prepared based on a production rate of 50,000 tonnes per day. Additional impact assessments for extensions or modifications to increase permitted capacity to 150,000 tonnes per day have been filed and approved since 2008. Reviews of the
environmental permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing and political factors and constraints for the Peñasquito Mine support the declaration of Mineral Reserves.

Capital and Operating Costs

Capital cost estimates are
based on the latest mine construction data and budgetary figures and quotes provided by suppliers. Capital cost estimates include funding for infrastructure, mobile equipment, development and permitting, and miscellaneous costs. Infrastructure
requirements were incorporated into the estimates as needed. Sustaining capital costs reflect current price trends.

The pyrite leach plant project
was given Board approval in 2016 and commenced construction.



|                            |  |                          |  | 
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | 
|Area                        |  | Life-of-Mine
($
million) |  | 
|Mine Pre Stripping          |  | $1,180.7                 | 
|General Sustaining          |  | $1,225.3                 | 
|Growth (Pyrite Leach
Plant) |  | $402.4                   | 
|Total                       |  | $2,808.4                 | 

Operating costs were estimated by our workforce and are based on the 2016 LOM budget. Labour cost estimation is based on
our 2016 salary scale and fringe benefits in force. Mining consumables are based on 2016 costs and contracts and the costs for future operation consumables, such as mill reagents and grinding media are based on recent supplier quotations.



|                                     |  |                                   |  | 
|------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------- |  | 
|Area                                 |  | Life-of-Mine ($ per tonne)        |  | 
|Process Plant (with Pyrite Leach)    |  | $8.65 per tonne milled            | 
|Process Plant (without
Pyrite Leach) |  | $6.92 per tonne milled            | 
|General &
Administration             |  | $1.62 per tonne milled            | 
|Mining                               |  | $2.26 per tonne of material mined | 



- 56 -



---

Exploration, Development and Production

In 2017, exploration at the Peñasquito Mine will continue to focus on defining near pit Mineral Resources and selected regional targets. The
skarn geological target below the current Peñasquito open pit is on hold and remains a lower priority within the list of local and regional targets.

At the Peñasquito Mine, gold production for 2017 is expected to be 410,000 ounces (+/-5%). See Risk Factors  Our financial
projections rely on estimates of future production and estimates of future production may not be reliable, which could have a negative impact on our future cash flows, business, results of operations and financial condition.

PUEBLO VIEJO MINE, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

We hold a 40%
interest in the Pueblo Viejo Mine, an open pit gold mine located in the Dominican Republic. Barrick holds the other 60% interest in, and operates, the Pueblo Viejo Mine.

The scientific and technical information included in the following section has been derived from the technical report entitled Technical Report on the
Pueblo Viejo Project, Sanchez Ramirez province, Dominican Republic (the Pueblo Viejo Report) dated March 27, 2014, prepared by Luke Evans, M.Sc., P.Eng., Hugo Miranda, MBA, P.C., and Kathleen Ann Altman, Ph.D., P.E., of
Roscoe Postle Associates Inc., each of whom is a qualified person under NI 43-101.

Property Description, Location and
Access

The Pueblo Viejo Mine is located in the central part of the Dominican Republic on the Caribbean island of Hispaniola in the province of
Sanchez Ramirez. The Pueblo Viejo Mine is 15 kilometres west of the provincial capital of Cotui and approximately 100 kilometres northwest of the national capital of Santo Domingo. Access to the Pueblo Viejo Mine from Santo Domingo is by a four
lane, paved highway, which then connects to a paved, two-lane, secondary highway at the town of Piedra Blanca, approximately 78 kilometres from Santo Domingo, the location of the main port facility.

Pueblo Viejo Dominicana Corporation (PVDC) is the holder of the right to lease the Montenegro Fiscal Reserve by virtue of a special
lease agreement of mining rights, effective as of July 29, 2003, as amended in November 2009 and on October 5, 2013 (the Special Lease Agreement). The Special Lease Agreement provides PVDC with the right to operate for a
25-year period, which was triggered on February 26, 2008, with rights of renewal allowing for a total of 75 years. Under the Special Lease Agreement, PVDC is obliged to pay to the government of the
Dominican Republic: income tax; a net smelter return royalty; and a net profits interest.

The second amendment to the Special Lease Agreement,
effective October 5, 2013, mainly covers changes to the special tax regime previously agreed in the Special Lease Agreement. The most notable modifications include: elimination of a 10% return embedded in the initial capital investment for the
purposes of the net profits interest calculation; an extension to the period over which PVDC may recover its capital investment; a delay of application of net profits interest deductions; a reduction in tax depreciation rates; and establishment of a
graduated minimum tax. The graduated tax rate will be adjusted up or down based on future metal prices. The agreement also includes the following broad parameters consistent with the previous terms of the Special Lease Agreement: corporate income
tax rate of 25%; net smelter return royalty of 3.2%; and net profits interest of 28.75%.

PVDC holds all surface rights necessary to access and
exploit the deposits. PVDC has acquired all of the permits necessary to operate the Pueblo Viejo Mine at the present time. In addition to the mine operations, by means of the second amendment to the Special Lease Agreement, the Dominican Republic
granted PVDC a power concession to generate electricity for consumption by the Pueblo Viejo Mine and the right to sell excess power. Also, in March 2012, PVDC obtained an environmental permit for the Quisqueya Power Plant and a power transmission
line from San Pedro to the Pueblo Viejo Mine site.

The government of the Dominican Republic remains responsible for the relocation, where
necessary, of



- 57 -



---

those persons dwelling in the Los Cacaos basin. Pursuant to the Special Lease Agreement, environmental remediation within the mine site and its area of influence is the responsibility of PVDC,
while the Dominican Republic government is responsible for historic impacts outside the development area and for the hazardous substances located at the Rosario Resources Corporation of New York (Rosario) plant site. However,
agreement was reached in 2009 that PVDC would donate up to $37.5 million, or half of the governments total estimated cost of $75 million, for its clean-up responsibilities. In December 2010,
PVDC agreed to contribute the remaining $37.5 million on behalf of the government towards these clean-up activities.

History

The earliest records of Spanish mine workings at
Pueblo Viejo are from 1505, although Spanish explorers sent into the interior of the island during the second visit of Columbus in 1495 probably found the deposit being actively mined by the native population. The Spanish mined the deposit until
1525, when the mine was abandoned in favour of newly discovered deposits on the American mainland. There are few records of activity at Pueblo Viejo from 1525 to 1950, when the Dominican government sponsored geological mapping in the region.
Exploration at Pueblo Viejo focused on sulphide veins hosted in unoxidized sediments in stream bed outcrops.

Rosario optioned the property in 1969.
As before, exploration was directed first at the unoxidized rock where sulphide veins outcropped in the stream valley and the oxide cap was only a few metres thick. As drilling moved out of the valley and on to higher ground, the thickness of the
oxide cap increased to a maximum of 80 metres, revealing an oxide ore deposit of significant tonnage. In 1972, Rosario Dominicana S.A. was incorporated and open pit mining of the oxide deposits started in the Moore deposit in 1975. In 1979, the
Dominican Republic Central Bank purchased all foreign-held shares in the mine. Rosario continued exploration throughout the 1970s and early 1980s, looking for additional oxide resources to extend the life of the mine.

The Monte Negro, Mejita, and Cumba deposits were identified by soil sampling and percussion drilling, and were put into production in the 1980s. With
the oxide resources diminishing, Rosario initiated studies on the underlying refractory sulphide resource in an effort to continue the operation and in 1986 and 1992, feasibility studies were conducted.

Rosario continued to mine the oxide material until approximately 1991, when the oxide resource was essentially exhausted. A carbon-in-leach plant circuit and new tailings facility at Las Lagunas were commissioned to process transitional sulphide ore at a maximum of 9,000 tonnes per day.
Results were poor, with gold recoveries varying from 30% to 50%. Mining in the Moore deposit stopped early in the 1990s owing to high copper content (which resulted in high cyanide consumption) and ore hardness. Mining ceased in the Monte Negro
deposit in 1998, and stockpile mining continued until July 1999, when the operation was shut down. In 24 years of production, the Pueblo Viejo Mine produced a total of 5.5 million ounces of gold and 25.2 million ounces of silver.

Three companies were involved in Rosarios attempt to find a strategic partner in 1992 and 1996: GENEL JV, Mount Isa Mines Ltd.
(MIM), and Newmont Mining Corporation (Newmont). The process was never completed but each of the three companies conducted work on the property for their evaluations.

In 2000, the government of the Dominican Republic invited international bids for the leasing and mineral exploitation of the Pueblo Viejo sulphide
deposits. Placer Dome Inc. (Placer Dome) was the successful bidder and the parties negotiated the Special Lease Agreement, which became effective on July 29, 2003. Placer Dome conducted regional mapping, geotechnical
assessment, environmental baseline studies and exploration drilling until February 2006, when Barrick acquired Placer Dome and subsequently sold us a 40% stake in the Pueblo Viejo Mine.



- 58 -



---

In August 2010, the open pit pre-stripping started. The total ore
mined between 2010 and 2016 is 90.6 million tonnes. In 2016, the total ore processed was 7,545,000 tonnes which, based on our 40% interest, produced 467,000 gold ounces for Goldcorp.

Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit Types

The
Pueblo Viejo Mine is hosted by the Lower Cretaceous Los Ranchos Formation, a series of volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks that extend across the eastern half of the Dominican Republic, generally striking northwest and dipping southwest. The Los
Ranchos Formation consists of a lower complex of pillowed basalt, basaltic andesite flows, dacitic flows, tuffs, and intrusions, overlain by volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks, and interpreted to be a Lower Cretaceous intra-oceanic island arc, one of
several bimodal volcanic piles that form the base of the Greater Antilles Caribbean islands. The unit has undergone extensive seawater metamorphism (spilitization), and lithologies have been referred to as spilite (basaltic-andesite) and keratophyre
(dacite).

The Pueblo Viejo member of the Los Ranchos Formation is confined to a restricted, sedimentary basin measuring approximately
three kilometres north to south by two kilometres east to west. The basin is filled with lacustrine deposits that range from coarse conglomerate deposited at the edge of the basin to thinly bedded carbonaceous sandstone, siltstone, and
mudstone deposited further from the paleo-shoreline. In addition, there are pyroclastic rocks, dacitic domes, and diorite dykes within the basin. The Pueblo Viejo member is bounded to the east by volcaniclastic rocks, and to the north and west by
Platanal Member basaltic-andesite (spilite) flows and dacitic domes. To the south, the Pueblo Viejo member is overthrust by the Hatillo Limestone Formation.

Pueblo Viejo is a high sulphidation, quartz-alunite epithermal gold and silver deposit. High sulphidation deposits are typically derived from fluids
enriched in magmatic volatiles, which have migrated from a deep intrusive body to an epithermal crustal setting, with only limited dilution by groundwater or interaction with host rocks. Major dilatant structures or phreatomagmatic breccia pipes
provide conduits for rapid fluid ascent and so facilitate evolution of the characteristic high sulphidation fluid. Mineralization is predominantly pyrite with lesser amounts of sphalerite and enargite. Pyrite mineralization occurs as disseminations,
layers, replacements, and veins. Sphalerite and enargite mineralization is primarily in veins, but disseminated sphalerite has been noted in core.

The Pueblo Viejo deposits are classed as high sulphidation, epithermal gold and silver of the quartz-alunite style. They are characterized by veins,
vuggy breccias and sulphide replacements ranging from pods to massive lenses, occurring generally in volcanic sequences and associated with high-level hydrothermal systems. Acid leaching, advanced argillic alternation, and silicification are
characteristic alternation styles. Grade and tonnage varies widely. Pyrite, gold, electrum and enargite/luzonite are typical minerals and minor minerals include chalcopyrite, sphalerite, tetrahedrite/tennantite, galena, marcasite, arsenopyrite,
silver sulphosalts, and tellurides.

There were three stages of advanced argillic alteration associated with precious metal mineralization. The
third stage of mineralization occurred when hydro-fracturing of the silica cap produced pyrite-sphalerite-enargite veins with silicified haloes. Exposed at the surface, individual veins can be traced vertically over three pit benches
(30 metres). Veins are typically concentrated in zones that are elongated north-northwest and can be 250 metres long, 100 metres wide and 100 metres vertical. Stage three veins contain the highest precious and base metal values
and are more widely distributed in the upper portions of the deposits. The most common vein minerals are pyrite, sphalerite, and quartz with lesser amounts of enargite, barite, and pyrophyllite. Trace amounts of electrum, argentite, colusite,
tetrahedrite-tennantite, geocronite, galena, siderite and tellurides are also found in veins.

Gold is intimately associated with pyrite veins,
disseminations, replacements, and layers within the zones of advanced argillic alteration. Gold values generally are the highest in zones of silicification or strong quartz-pyrophyllite alteration. These gold-bearing alteration zones are widely
distributed in the upper parts of the deposits and tend to funnel into narrow feeder zones. Gold occurs as native gold, sylvanite



- 59 -



---

(AuAgTe4), and aurostibnite (AuSb2). The principal carrier of gold is pyrite where
the sub-microscopic gold occurs in colloidal-size micro inclusions (less than 0.5 micrometres) and as a solid solution within the crystal structure of the pyrite. Silver
content tends to correlate gold content and silver has a strong association with stage three veins, where it occurs in a variety of minerals.

Most
copper occurs as enargite hosted in stage three veins and only trace amounts of chalcocite and chalcopyrite have been recorded. The majority of zinc occurs as sphalerite, primarily in stage three veins and, to a lesser extent, as disseminations.
Lead minerals include galena, geocronite, boulangerite, and bournonite, most of which are present as fine inclusions or within fractures in pyrite, sphalerite, and enargite. Elevated lead values were found in the structural feeder zone in the Moore
deposit and lead may provide clues on where to search for other feeder zones.

The Moore Deposit

Pyrite-rich, gold-bearing veins at the Moore deposit have a mean width of four centimetres and are steeply-dipping with a trend commonly
north-northwest. Secondary pyrite vein-sets trend north-south and north-northeast.

Thinly bedded carbonaceous siltstones and andesitic sandstones
in the West Flank dip shallowly westwards. Dips increase towards the west where north-trending thrusts displace bedding. Pyrite and limonite-rich veins with gold mineralization are sub-vertical and trend
commonly north-northwest. Quartz veins with gold trend northwest oblique to the pyrite veins have a similar strike to the interpreted contact with the overlying Hatillo limestone. They also occur as tension-gash arrays in centimetre-scale dextral
shear zones that trend north-northwest. Two main north-northeast faults were mapped across the West Flank, sub-parallel with the Moore dacite porphyry contact.

Bedding to the north of the Moore dacite porphyry dips shallowly westwards. There are three steep-dipping, gold-bearing, pyrite-rich vein sets:
northwest, northeast and north south. Northwest trending veins generally contain enargite and sphalerite, while northeast trending veins are more pyrite ± pyrophyllite rich. The average vein width is 3.5 centimetres.

The Monte Negro Deposit

Pyrite-rich veins with gold
mineralization are sub-vertical and have bimodal trends, which are interpreted to form conjugate sets. The mean width is two centimetres. The north-northwest trending set is
sub-parallel to the strike of bedding and fold axes. Enargite and sphalerite-bearing veins with gold dominantly trend north-northeast and have a mean width of three centimetres. The combination of vein trends
forms a high-grade gold zone (Vein Zone One) which extends 500 metres north-northwest, and is 150 metres wide and up to 100 metres thick between the F5 Fault to the east and the Main Monte Negro Fault to the west. The fault pattern is dominated by
steep north-northwest trending faults sub-parallel to the dominant pyrite vein set. The main Monte Negro Fault is a 25 metre by 500 metre zone of silicification, brecciation, mineralization, folding, and
faulting.

Close to the interpreted Monte Negro Fault, bedding dips more westerly and strikes north-northwest. Mineralized veins at the Monte Negro
South Zone are relatively pyrite-poor, sphalerite-rich, and wider (five centimetres to six centimetres). The veins are sub-vertical and trend northwest. The episodic vein fill demonstrates a clear paragenesis
(massive pyrite-enargite-sphalerite-grey silica). Shallow-dipping bedding and sub-vertical sphalerite-silica veins on the southern margin of Monte Negro South are cut by a westerly-dipping thrust and the fault
dips 35 degrees. The main zone of gold mineralization that results from this combination of structures extends for approximately 150 metres along the West Thrust Fault.

The primary controls on the geometry of the gold deposits at the Pueblo Viejo Mine are strong quartz-pyrophyllite alteration and quartz-pyrite veining
along sub-vertical structures and stratigraphic zones. The veins are tens of centimetres wide but are most commonly less than two centimetres wide. Narrow veinlets occur along bedding planes and along fracture
surfaces. These veins are commonly highly discordant to bedding but locally branch out along shallow-dipping bedding planes, linking high angle



- 60 -



---

veins in ladder-like fashion without obvious preferred orientations. These veins served as feeders to the layered and disseminated mineralization that occurs in shallower levels in the deposit.
The result is composite zones of mineralization within fracture systems and stratigraphic horizons adjacent to major faults that served as conduits for hydrothermal fluids. The outer boundary of advanced argillic alteration, combined with
lithological and veining zones were used to generate domains for Mineral Resource estimation.

Exploration

During 2016, three exploration programs were undertaken at Pueblo Viejo. These consisted of reverse circulation drilling in the Monte Negro pit and
Monte Oculto North pit, and reverse circulation condemnation drilling at NAG Monte Oculto waste dump. In 2017, exploration plans include reserve circulation drilling and mapping in Upper Mejita and core drilling in the Monte Negro and Moore pits, in
each case within or at the borders of the current pit boundaries. Pueblo Viejo also intends to conduct infill drilling at the Las Lagunas limestone quarry during 2017.

Drilling

As of December 31, 2016, the drill hole
database used to support the development of mineral resources for the Pueblo Viejo property contains 3,685 drill holes, comprised of 872 diamond drill core holes, 1,610 reverse circulation, and 1,203 percussion holes and rotary samples. Samples
totaling 171,382 metres from diamond drill holes, 62,588 metres from rotary and percussion holes, and 149,129 metres from reverse circulation have been collected. In addition, 12,044 close-spaced reverse circulation grade control drill holes,
totaling 486,979 metres were used to estimate the gold, copper and silver resources. The drill hole spacing is variable, ranging from 15 to 75 metres.

Drill pads are located using GPS or surface plans where the GPS signal is weak. After completion, the drill hole locations are surveyed in Universal
Transverse Mercator coordinates by a professional surveyor, translated into the mine coordinate system, and entered into the drill hole database. Two or three down-hole surveys are completed in all drill holes. Surveys are spaced every
60 metres to 75 metres, and deviation of the drill holes is minimal.

In 2007, drilling resulted in the discovery of new deeper
mineralization on the east side of Monte Negro and additional mineralization in the west part of the Moore pit. During 2008, PVDC drill programs targeted definition drilling on open mineralization at Monte Negro North, definition drilling between
the Moore and Monte Negro pits and geotechnical drilling to define pit slope parameters. In addition, diamond drill holes were drilled into the limestone areas to assist in the definition of limestone quality for construction and processing
purposes. In 2010, PVDC undertook a close-spaced, reverse circulation, grade control drilling program for phase one pit shells in the Moore and Monte Negro open pits.

Geotechnical and water management drilling at the Pueblo Viejo Mine was completed from 2001 to 2010 by BGC Engineering Inc. (BGC), an
international consulting firm specializing in geotechnical and water resources engineering. Water Management Consulting (WMC) drilled some drill holes in 2003 and 2004. The BGC and WMC holes from 2001 to 2010 are mostly short
holes and have been excluded from the Mineral Resource estimate because they were not assayed.

Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification

Sample intervals are normally two metres, but are shortened at lithological, structural, or major alteration contacts. Three metre samples are used in non-mineralized zones. Core logging is performed by geological technicians and includes photographic records and appropriate record keeping, and the core is cut into halves using a core saw prior to sampling. The
entire second half of the core is kept for records and future metallurgical test work, and the other half is placed in sample bags and numbered. Since mid-2010,
sub-samples are prepared on-site and the pulverized samples are sent to Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. (Acme) in Santiago and ALS Chemex Labs Ltd.
in Peru.



- 61 -



---

PVDC currently requests gold assays by fire assay with atomic absorption on 30 gram aliquots and
gravimetric finishes for all assays exceeding ten g/t of gold. Silver and zinc values are analyzed using aqua regia digestion method and atomic absorption finish. A 35-element inductively coupled plasma atomic
emission spectroscopy analysis is done on all samples. Sulphur and carbon are assayed by LECO furnace. The PVDC laboratory does periodic sieve checks as part of its internal quality control procedures. The reverse circulation grade control samples
were mostly sent to ALS Chemex in Lima up until early 2013, when the Pueblo Viejo Mine began assaying the samples directly at the PVDC laboratory. The main difference is that the PVDC laboratory uses a 15 gram aliquot compared to 30 gram at ALS
Chemex.

The QA/QC procedures in place since 2007 consist of the introduction of blanks, standards (commercial and custom), core duplicates, coarse
duplicates and cleaning blanks into the sampling process. Each batch is submitted with 76 samples, of which two are blanks, two to three are standards, two are core duplicates, two are coarse duplicates, and seven are cleaning blanks. The PVDC
geology department currently inserts four certified reference materials, four field duplicates, and four blanks into each batch of 60 samples. This is in addition to the twelve internal control samples inserted by the PVDC laboratory, which include
four certified reference materials, two coarse preparation blanks, two reagent blanks, two duplicates, and two replicates. Consequently, 40% of the samples in each batch of 60 samples are quality control samples.

Since August 1, 2007, PVDC has been sending approximately 5% of the pulps to a secondary laboratory. The ACME
on-site preparation facility carried out regular granulometric control tests on approximately three percent of the crushed and pulverized material. The results were monitored by ACME and PVDC personnel. The
PVDC laboratory has continued this practice and these results are included in monthly QA/QC reports. Monitoring is undertaken on a batch by batch basis. Any check results that fall outside the established control limited is re-assayed if the cause is not the result of a sample number switch.

Barrick reviewed assays for MIM, GENEL JV,
Rosario and Placer Dome drilling in both the Moore and Monte Negro deposits. In general, it found reasonable agreement of the orientation, tenor, and thickness of mineralization between drilling campaigns in both deposits where MIM, GENEL JV,
Rosario, and Placer Dome drill holes cross. Histograms of the historical drilling campaigns show that the diamond core drilling from all campaigns except PVDC compare well with the global distribution.

The PVDC drilling was targeted at the periphery of the existing mineralization so that overall lower grades would be expected. The reverse circulation
and rotary drilling also compare well, with the exception of the Placer Dome rotary holes which are biased high and were possibly preferentially drilled in shallow high grade areas to better delineate early production. The information from these
holes should have been removed from the database, but this does not constitute a material issue. Approximately 2.5% of the Rosario data have been verified against original documents. The Rosario core, reverse circulation and some rotary data are
generally reliable and those that are considered to be of questionable validity have not been used in resource estimates.

As noted earlier, most of
the shallow Rosario drill holes were drilled in oxide areas now mined out and have virtually no influence on sulphide Mineral Resource estimates. GENEL JV and Placer Dome data have been verified and are considered reliable. MIM data has not been
verified against original documents and there is some risk involved with using that data. On the basis of comparisons between mineralized intersections in MIM holes and those in nearby Placer Dome holes, the risk of using the MIM data is considered
to be acceptable. Placer Dome data has been verified against original documents and is considered to be reliable.

Drilling data is acceptable for
the purpose of overall Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation and economic assessments. Some of the data may result in minor inaccuracies in local estimates.

Prior to making geotechnical measurements, the entire core interval is removed from the core box and placed in a long trough made of angle-iron. The
fractures in the core are lined up, and artificial fractures are identified. This process allows the technician to mark the orienting line on the core for a better



- 62 -



---

estimate of core recovery. The core is cut in half and the entire second half of core is kept for records and future metallurgical test work. The archived half of the core is stored on site for
future reference in suitable storage conditions. The sampled half is placed in plastic sample bags marked with the appropriate sample number and sealed with a numbered security tag. Since mid-2010, PVDC has
been preparing the sub-samples on-site and sending the pulverized samples to commercial laboratories. The reverse circulation grade control samples were mostly sent to
ALS Chemex in Lima up until early 2013 when the mine began assaying the samples directly at the PVDC laboratory. We consider sample security to be adequate and to meet industry standards.

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

The Pueblo
Viejo ore is refractory and consists primarily of gold and silver intimately associated with pyrite that occurs as encapsulated sub-micron particles and in solid solution. As a result, there is a requirement
to chemically break down the pyrite to recover the precious metals. In addition, there are cyanide consuming minerals and preg-robbing carbonaceous material in some ores. Pyrite and sphalerite are the two main sulphide minerals, both occurring in
veins and disseminated within the host rock. Using lithological and mineralization criteria, five metallurgical ore types have been defined, including two for the Moore deposit and three for the Monte Negro deposit. The main criterion used to define
metallurgical domains is carbon content, i.e., separating carbonaceous rocks from lower carbon-content rocks in each deposit.

Pressure oxidation of
the whole ore followed by carbon-in-leach cyanidation of the autoclave product is expected to recover 88.7% of the gold and 80.0% of the silver. The efficient and
trouble-free operation of the pressure oxidization circuit relies heavily on maintaining relatively constant sulphur content in the autoclave feed. Studies showed that there are wide variations in the sulphur content of the ore as the blocks are
mined sequentially. The variation in sulphur grade ranges from 3% to 20% sulphur and generally between 5% and 10%. Blending of ores prior to crushing is carried out.

Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimate

The following
table sets forth the Mineral Reserve estimation for our 40% interest in the Pueblo Viejo Mine effectiveDecember 31, 2016:

Proven and
Probable Mineral Reserves (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

|                  |  |                   |  |                        |  |                           |  |                 |  |  |  |                             |  |                              |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | --------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                  |  |                   |  | Grade                  |  |                           |  | Contained Metal
|Category          |  | Tonnes
(millions) |  | Gold
(grams per
tonne) |  | Silver
(grams per  tonne) |  | Copper
(%)      |  |  |  | Gold
(millions of   ounces) |  | Silver
(millions of  ounces) |  | Copper
(millions of
pounds)
|                  |  |                   |  |                        |  |                           |  |                
|Proven            |  | 40.45             |  | 2.82                   |  | 18.68                     |  | 0.09            |  |  |  | 3.67                        |  | 24.29                        |  | 83.25                      
|Probable          |  | 16.77             |  | 3.19                   |  | 14.07                     |  | 0.10            |  |  |  | 1.72                        |  | 7.58                         |  | 36.83                      
|Proven + Probable |  | 57.21             |  | 2.93                   |  | 17.33                     |  | 0.10            |  |  |  | 5.39                        |  | 31.87                        |  | 120.08                     



|(1) | The Mineral Reserves for Pueblo Viejo Mine set out in the table above have been reviewed and approved by Gil Lawson,
P.Eng., Vice President of Geology and Mine Planning, Goldcorp, who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven and Probable, and are based on the CIM Definition
Standards.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | No cut-off grade is applied. Instead, the profit of each block in the Mineral
Resource is calculated and included in the Mineral Reserve if the value is positive.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Mineral Reserves are estimated using a long-term price of $1,200 per ounce of gold, $16.50 per ounce of silver and $3.00
per pound of copper.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | 100% mining recovery and no dilution.
|--- | -------------------------------------

|(5) | Average metallurgical recovery is 88.7% for gold, 80.0% for silver and 47.5% for copper.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Numbers may not add up due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------

|(7) | We are not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political or other
modifying factors that could materially affect the Mineral Reserve estimate.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 63 -



---

The following table sets forth the gold, silver and copper Mineral Resource estimations for our 40%
interest in the Pueblo Viejo Mine effective December 31, 2016:

Measured, Indicated and Inferred Gold, Silver and Copper Mineral Resources (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)

(excluding Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves)

|                     |  |                   |  |                        |  |                         |  |                 |  |  |  |                            |  |                            |  |                             
|-------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                     |  |                   |  | Grade                  |  |                         |  | Contained Metal
|Category             |  | Tonnes
(millions) |  | Gold
(grams
per
tonne) |  | Silver
(gramsper
tonne) |  | Copper
(%)      |  |  |  | Gold
(millions  of
ounces) |  | Silver
(millions ofounces) |  | Copper
(millions  of pounds)
|                     |  |                   |  |                        |  |                         |  |                
|Measured             |  | 6.79              |  | 2.33                   |  | 14.53                   |  | 0.09            |  |  |  | 0.51                       |  | 3.17                       |  | 13.43                       
|Indicated            |  | 63.64             |  | 2.33                   |  | 11.22                   |  | 0.09            |  |  |  | 4.76                       |  | 22.97                      |  | 119.77                      
|Measured + Indicated |  | 70.43             |  | 2.33                   |  | 11.54                   |  | 0.09            |  |  |  | 5.27                       |  | 26.14                      |  | 133.20                      
|Inferred             |  | 1.90              |  | 2.05                   |  | 9.76                    |  | 0.02            |  |  |  | 0.12                       |  | 0.60                       |  | 0.91                        



|(1) | The Mineral Resources for Pueblo Viejo Mine set out in the table above have been reviewed and approved by Gil Lawson,
P.Eng., Vice President of Geology and Mine Planning, Goldcorp, who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred, and are based on the CIM
Definition Standards.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Mineral Resources are estimated based on an economic cut-off value.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Mineral Resources are estimated using a long-term price of $1,500 per ounce of gold, $17.50 per ounce of silver and $3.25
per pound of copper.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | A minimum mining block size of 10 metres by 10 metres by 10 metres was used.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | All Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of those Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves. Mineral
Resources do not have demonstrated economic viability.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Mineral Resource contained in reserve pit excluded due to tailings storage facility capacity constraint.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | Numbers may not add due to rounding.
|--- | ------------------------------------

|(8) | We are not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political or other
modifying factors that could materially affect the Mineral Resource estimate.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Processing and Recovery Operations

The Pueblo Viejo Mine consists of two open pits: Moore and Monte Negro. Mining operations are undertaken by a conventional truck and shovel method. Mine
development began in August 2010 and current mine activity is in the Monte Negro and Moore pits. Commercial production began in January 2013 and the ramp-up to commercial production was achieved on
January 1, 2014.Higher grade ore is processed in the early years, while lower grade ore is stockpiled for later processing in order to maximize project economics. The ore stockpiles are classified as high grade, medium grade and low
grade material. As at December 31, 2016, the total ore on stockpile was 62.4 million tonnes and will reach the maximum of approximately 80 million tonnes by 2023.

The pit stages have been designed to optimize the early extraction of the higher grade ore. Notwithstanding, the driver of the mine schedule is the
sulphur blending requirement. Sulphur grade is as important as the gold grade, because the metallurgical aspects of the processing operation, the recoveries achieved, and the processing costs, all strongly depend on a very consistent, low-variability sulphur content in the plant feed. The combination of direct feed and stockpile re-handle is the current short term blending strategy of the Pueblo Viejo Mine.

Potentially acid generating waste rock from the Moore and Monte Negro pits is hauled to the El Llagal tailings area, and is submerged in the
tailings facility. The total storage capacity of the tailings storage facility is for 279 million cubic metres of waste material (waste volume). The methodology used by PVDC for pit limit determination,
cut-off grade optimization, production sequencing and scheduling, and estimation of equipment/manpower requirements is in line with standard industry practices.

The processing method requires a significant amount of slurry and lime derived from high quality limestone. The limestone tonnage required, with
acceptable quality, has been located in the vicinity of the Pueblo Viejo Mine. Ground limestone and lime are required to neutralize acidic liquors and to control the pH in the carbon in leach circuit. The limestone plant consists of primary crushing
and screening, grinding, calcining, and lime slaking.



- 64 -



---

The ore processing rate and the nominal plant capacity is set at 24,000 tonnes per day of refractory ore.
It consists of the following unit operations: primary crushing; semi-autogenous grinding and ball mill grinding with pebble crushing; pressure oxidization; hot curing; counter-current-decantation washing; iron precipitation; copper sulphide
precipitation and recovery; neutralization; solution cooling; lime boiling for silver enhancement; carbon-in-leach circuit; carbon acid washing, stripping and
regeneration; electrowinning; refining; cyanide destruction; tailings disposal; tailings effluent and acid rock drainage treatment; and limestone crushing, calcining and lime staking. The processing rate is flexible based on the sulphur content of
the ore and will not always achieve 24,000 tonnes per day since the average sulphur grade of the reserves varies.

Gold, silver, and copper are the
principal commodities at the Pueblo Viejo Mine and are freely traded at prices that are widely known, so prospects for sale of any production are virtually assured. The Pueblo Viejo Mine is a large modern operation and Barrick and Goldcorp are major
international firms with policies and procedures for the letting of contracts. The contracts for smelting and refining are normal contracts for a large producer. There are numerous contracts at the mine including project development contracts to
provide services to augment Barricks efforts.

Infrastructure, Permitting and Compliance Activities

The tailings storage facility is operating in the El Llagal valley approximately 3.5 kilometres south of the plant site and the progressive raising of a
large rock-filled dam with an impermeable saprolite core is underway. With respect to Mineral Reserve estimates, the current mine life is constrained by tailings storage facility availability.

The Pueblo Viejo Mine is supplied electric power from two sources via two independent 230 kilovolt transmission circuits. A 215 megawatt Wartsila
combined cycle reciprocating engine power plant together with an approximately 100 kilometre transmission line connects the plant to the Pueblo Viejo Mine site. The power plant is located near the port city of San Pedro de Macoris on the south coast
and will provide the long-term power supply for the Pueblo Viejo Mine.

The Hatillo and Hondo Reservoirs supply fresh water to the site. Reclaimed
water from tailing storage facilities is used as a supplementary water supply under drought and flood situations. The potable water is a treated system. Reclaimed water from the tailings storage facility sites is used as a supplementary water supply
under drought and flood situations. Barge-mounted pumps at the larger Hatillo Reservoir pump fresh water to the Hondo Reservoir for make-up purposes. Fresh water is then pumped to a fresh water/fire water tank
at the 400 metre level and a freshwater pond, and from there it is distributed throughout the site for process, fire protection, and potable needs.

Mine development is designed to treat the majority of surface water that has been impacted by historical mining activity, and to control water quality
during mine operation and post closure so that the water released to the receiving environment will meet water quality standards established by the Dominican Republic government and the World Bank. The process treated water is discharged to the
Margajita River.

Acid rock drainage studies confirmed that historic mining and current acid rock drainage generation within the mine site had
severely impacted the surrounding area. EnviroGold Limited is developing an operation for re-treating Las Lagunas tailings. PVDC built a water treatment plant larger than would otherwise be required for mining
operations. It is understood that the Las Lagunas project area would become the responsibility of the Dominican government on completion of the Pueblo Viejo Project and that no liability should fall to PVDC. However, because of the proximity of the
area to PVDCs operations and the uncertainty of the political and social environment in seven or more years time, there is some risk that PVDC may become involved. Any involvement should not represent a material risk to the Pueblo Viejo
Mine.

PVDC plans to progressively reclaim the mine site as sections of the site become available. The design of the mine closure plan considers a
number of interrelated components. Among these are legal and



- 65 -



---

other obligations, closure objectives, environmental and social considerations, technical design criteria, closure assumptions, health and safety hazards, and relinquishment conditions. The
overall, long term post-closure land use objective for the site is to return it to a self-sustaining condition suitable to support pre-mining land use activities such as small scale agriculture, hunting, and
artisanal forestry.

In 2005, as updated in 2007, PVDC completed a feasibility study on the Pueblo Viejo Mine. An environmental and social impact
assessment (ESIA) and environmental management plan (EMP) were approved by the Secretariat of State for the Environment and Natural Resources on December 26, 2006 and the environmental licence No. 0101-06 was issued in January 2007 (the Environmental Licence). Conditions of the Environmental License include detailed designs for tailings dams, installation of monitoring
stations and submission for review of the waste management plan and incineration plant design. Other changes have been submitted to the authorities for additional facilities. The last amendment to the Environmental License was issued on
November 13, 2013, which authorized the construction of an emulsion plant. An environmental license modification for project process expansion was submitted to authorities in late 2008 and approved in September 2010.

The Environmental Licence requires a compliance bond that corresponds to 10% of the cost of the Environmental Adjustment and Management Plan
(PMAA) defined for the operational phase. At the end of the operational phase, PVDC will provide the corresponding bond at 10% of the total amount of the PMAA for the closure and post closure phases.

Capital and Operating Costs

Total sustaining capital and
operating costs for the major categories over the LOM are extracted from the Pueblo Viejo Report.

The open pit capital cost estimate includes
$156 million of mining equipment replacement as part of the $234 million total mining capital cost estimate. The processing capital cost estimate of $691 million includes infrastructure and TSF construction as the main expenses from
2014 to 2035. The G&A capital cost includes environmental and power capital costs as part of the $273 million over the life of the mine. Mine pre-stripping costs have been treated as an operating
cost, and mine site exploration capital has been excluded as that capital should be expended against future mineral resources.



| |            |      |        |                         
| | ---------- | ---- | ------ | ------------------------
| |            | Area |        | Life-of-Mine
($ million)
| | Mining     |      | $234  
| | Processing |      | $691  
| | G&A        |      | $273  
| | Total      |      | $1,198

An average overall operating cost is comprised of $3.06 per tonne for mining ore, $3.53 per tonne for mining waste,
$2.00 per tonne processed for rehandle, $48.70 per tonne for processing, $1.40 per tonne processed for dewatering and an annual cost of $77 million for G&A.



| |                      |      |                         |                           
| | -------------------- | ---- | ----------------------- | --------------------------
| |                      | Area |                         | Life-of-Mine
($ per tonne)
| | Mining Cost Ore      |      | $3.06 per tonne mined  
| | Mining Cost Waste    |      | $3.53 per tonne mined  
| | Mining Cost Rehandle |      | $2.00 per tonne milled 
| | Process Cost         |      | $48.70 per tonne milled
| | Dewatering           |      | $1.40 per tonne milled 

Exploration, Development and Production



- 66 -



---

In 2017, the Pueblo Viejo Mine will be focused on improving operational efficiencies. Barrick is currently
completing a pre-feasibility study to refine the technical and financial analysis for an increase in tailings storage capacity and confirm whether the measured and indicated mineral resources can be converted
into mineral reserves.

At the Pueblo Viejo Mine, our gold production for 2017 is expected to be 415,000 ounces (+/-5%). See Risk Factors
 Our financial projections rely on estimates of future production and estimates of future production may not be reliable, which could have a negative impact on our future cash flows, business, results of operations and financial
condition.

CERRO NEGRO MINE, ARGENTINA

The Cerro
Negro Mine, wholly-owned by Goldcorp, is an underground operation located in southern Argentina and a cornerstone of our portfolio.

The scientific
and technical information included in the following section has been derived from the technical report entitled Cerro Negro Operations, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the
Cerro Negro Report) dated effective December 31, 2015 prepared by Andrew Tripp, P.E., Dr. Sally Goodman, P.Geo., Dr. Guillermo Pareja, P.Geo., and Kevin Murray, P.Eng., each of whom is a qualified person under NI 43-101.

Project Description, Location and Access

The Cerro Negro Mine is located about 345 kilometres by road southwest of the coastal city of Comodoro Rivadavia. Vehicle access to the property is from
the coastal city of Comodoro Rivadavia, which is a 2.5 hour flight south of Buenos Aires. From Comodoro Rivadavia, road vehicle access to the project takes approximately six hours. Road vehicle access is also possible from the west side of the
project from the town of Perito Moreno, about a 1.5 hour drive. The commercial airport at Balmaceda, Chile is about a five-hour drive to the west of the project. Within the project, a network of internal gravel roads services the various mines,
plant and exploration sites.

The mineral tenure consists of 10 mining leases (minas) totalling 21,548 hectares, and three exploration licences
(cateos), covering 5,338.8 hectares. Tenure is held in the name of Oroplata SA (Oroplata), our wholly-owned subsidiary. Tenure for minas is indefinite, providing that annual payments are made in February and July each year.

A thin, 20 metre wide x 3 kilometre long gap currently exists internal to the tenements and we have initiated the process required to eliminate the gap.

The tenements lie on parts of five estancias (farms), respectively Cerro Negro, El Retiro, La Unión, Mariana and Los Tordos. We have access
and occupation agreements in force with the owners of La Unión, Los Tordos, Cerro Negro, and El Retiro estancias; these agreements allow us access to ground that we do not control and allow exploration activities to be conducted.

We also own significant lands in the Cerro Negro Mine area, totalling approximately 11,100 hectares, which lands overlie the Bajo Negro and Vein Zone
deposits and adjacent prospects.

Newcrest Mining Ltd. had a royalty interest of $1 million; this royalty has been paid. A 3% royalty is
payable to the Province of Santa Cruz, subject to certain adjustments. In addition, there is a Provincial Sustainability Fund royalty of up to 1% net smelter return, and a Municipality Sustainability Fund royalty of 1% of net earnings.

The Cerro Negro Mine operations hold all required permits to support the current mining operations.



- 67 -



---

History

Gold
mineralization was first recognized in the Cerro Negro Mine area in 1992. Minera Newcrest Argentina S.A. (Newcrest) undertook a reconnaissance exploration program over the Deseado Massif region in 1993, which identified
mineralization at the Eureka, Mariana, El Retiro, Las Margaritas and Vein Zone areas. Newcrest picked up an option over the Silica Cap prospect tenement and applied for additional ground to cover the identified gold anomalous areas.

Newcrest completed geological mapping and sampling in 1995, which identified significant mineralization and identified several anomalous zones. Pegasus
Gold International Inc. (Pegasus) joint-ventured the Eureka-Mariana portion of the Newcrest tenure in 1996, and undertook reverse circulation drilling and conducted trenching at the San Marcos prospect. Due to non-maintenance and Newcrest dropping its option on the Silica Cap claim, the resulting open ground was staked by MIM Argentina Exploraciones (MAE) in June 1995.

In 1997, Newcrest and MAE entered a joint venture and completed geological mapping at the Eureka, Las Margaritas, and Mariana Sur prospects; a soil
geochemistry orientation study and mobile metal ion soil geochemistry survey; portable infrared mineral analyzer analysis of clay alteration minerals in samples from reverse circulation holes; preliminary metallurgical studies; trenching; ground
magnetics and dipole-dipole induced polarization geophysical surveys; an airborne radiometric and aeromagnetic geophysical survey; and exploration drilling. Newcrest withdrew from the joint venture in early 1999, and MAE gained 100% control of the
Cerro Negro Mine.

Oroplata optioned the Cerro Negro Mine from MAE in 2000. Work completed from 2000 to 2003 consisted of evaluation and ground
checking of Landsat and ASTER spectral anomalies, reconnaissance mapping and sampling, and reverse circulation drilling.

In December 2003, Andean
Resources Limited (Andean) entered into an agreement with MAE to acquire a 51% interest in the Cerro Negro Mine, and subsequently acquired a 100% interest through the acquisition of Oroplata Pty Ltd., the parent entity of
Oroplata. Andean undertook data validation, geological mapping, reconnaissance rock chip sampling, backhoe trenching, gradient-array resistivity, dipole-dipole resistivity, gradient-array chargeability, and ground magnetic surveys, petrographic and
mineralogical descriptions, and exploration drilling. Mineral Resource estimates were undertaken in each year from 2005 to 2010. A pre-feasibility study was completed in 2008, and a feasibility study was
completed in 2010.

Since our acquisition of the Cerro Negro Mine in December 2010, we have completed further drilling, which identified significant
additional mineralization at the Mariana Central, Mariana Norte, San Marcos deposits and their extensions, an updated feasibility study in 2011 and completed mine construction. The Cerro Negro Mine achieved commercial production on January 1,
2015.



- 68 -



---

Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit Types

The Cerro Negro gold-silver veins are located near the northwestern margin of the Deseado Massif, a 60,000 square kilometre rigid crustal block in
southern Argentina bounded to the north by the Río Deseado, to the south by the Río Chico, to the east by the Atlantic coast, and to the west by the Andean Cordillera.

A late Triassic to late Cretaceous (23065 Ma) extensional phase, linked to the opening of the South Atlantic Ocean, triggered extensive Mesozoic
and Cenozoic magmatism throughout the massif. Magmatic activity commenced in the early Jurassic, with the intrusion of granitoids and eruption of coeval pyroclastic and epiclastic volcanic rocks. Andesitic to rhyolitic volcanism continued through
the mid- to late Jurassic, culminating in the deposition of epiclastic sediments in the early Cretaceous.

Basaltic volcanism commenced in the Cretaceous and continued throughout the Cenozoic; volcaniclastic sediments were deposited and tuffs were erupted in
the early Tertiary. These units are overlain by extensive Pleistocene fluvial gravel terraces.

Deposits within the Cerro Negro Mine operations are low-sulphidation, epithermal goldsilver vein deposits. The known deposits and prospects at Cerro Negro are distributed along and east of a volcanicsubvolcanic complex flanked and overlain by a series of
rhyolite domes. The eruptive products of the rhyolite domes form an ignimbrite apron, which post-dates the mineralization and forms extensive outcrops north and south of the volcanicsubvolcanic complex. These post-mineralization ignimbrites
have preserved the epithermal systems, as well as lacustrine sediments, travertine and sinter deposited at the Late Jurassic paleo-surface.

Vein
mineralogy depends on the location of veins relative to the Eureka Volcanic-Subvolcanic Complex. Veins within the Complex (Eureka, San Marcos and the Marianas) contain higher silver and gold grades, and the Eureka veins contain abundant adularia and
ginguro-style banding. Veins outside the dome and hosted by the Cerro Negro Ignimbrite (Bajo Negro and Vein Zone) contain lower silver grades, coarse pyrite rather than fine sulphides in ginguro bands, and a higher percentage of chalcedony and less
adularia and carbonate in the gangue.

Vein textures typical of low-sulphidation epithermal systems include
colloform and crustiform banding, cockade, and manganese/iron-oxide matrix breccias. At deeper levels, alternating colloform bands of quartz and adularia are developed, and bonanza gold-silver grades may be associated with dark, fine-grained ginguro
sulphide bands.

Exploration

Exploration has been
performed by a number of companies, including Newcrest, Pegasus, MAE, Oroplata and Andean. We acquired 100% of the Cerro Negro project in December 2010 in connection our acquisition of Andean.

Work completed includes geological mapping, surface rock sampling, reverse circulation and core drilling, metallurgical testwork, mineral resource and
mineral reserve estimation, and engineering and design studies. Andean completed a preliminary assessment, a pre-feasibility study, and a feasibility study on the project.

Drilling

Surface drilling completed in the Cerro Negro
Operations area to June 30, 2016 comprises 314 reverse circulation drill holes (approximately 88,000 metres) and 2,061 core holes (590,000 metres, approximately). Drilling was undertaken by Pegasus, MAE, Oroplata, Andean and Goldcorp, with the
majority of the drilling being by Andean and Goldcorp.



- 69 -



---

No information is available on the Pegasus logging protocols; however, logged geological information has
been spot checked where possible and those data are used for geological modeling. For the MAE drilling, core was logged, photographed, and cut on site. During the Oroplata drill programs, chips were logged at the completion of each hole with results
recorded in the field on handwritten log sheets and later transferred to a computer format. Prior to the use of geological logging software, core was logged initially on log sheets designed by Andean personnel. In about 2008, DH Logger (a Datamine
product) was implemented and used for digital logging of core. Logging data were entered directly into DH Logger. In addition, geotechnical logging was performed. Core recovery and rock quality designation data are routinely collected. All drill
core from the Andean programs has been photographed. We continue to utilize DH Logger and logs the same geological features as were logged by Andean.

Collar locations of holes drilled by prior operators were determined by a licensed surveyor using differential GPS instruments. Contracted surveyors
have been used from time to time. From 2009 to 2010, the surveyor was an employee of Andean and reported collar locations to the nearest millimetre using a differential GPS unit. Since 2011, surface collar locations and other surface features were
determined by our employees using differential GPS. Various Trimble instruments were used. Underground surveys are performed using total station instruments. Some collars are manually measured from points set using total station instruments.

No downhole surveys are available for the Pegasus drilling. Surveys for the MAE and Oroplata drilling were provided in a database, but have no
supporting documentation. Andean completed downhole surveys using an Eastman camera for holes drilled up to July 2007, a Reflex system tool for drill holes drilled between July 2007 and September 2008, and a gyroscopic system for holes drilled in
2009 and 2010. We perform downhole surveys of exploration holes with a Reflex Gyro on 10 metre intervals. Infill drilling from underground stations are surveyed using either a Reflex Gyro or a Reflex EZ-TRAC
on 3 metre intervals.

Overall, recovery for core samples averaged 93% with 80% of the intervals reporting >95% recovery. Recovery in the veins
frequently suffers because of the intense fracturing in the core. Review of the data indicates that there is likely no significant grade/recovery relationship for recoveries
330%.

Pegasus and Oroplata reverse circulation drill
holes were sampled every metre. During the MAE programs, sampling was carried out every 2 metres. All reverse circulation holes drilled by Andean have been sampled every metre, with the exception of the first hole drilled at Vein Zone which was
sampled every 2 metres. We generally do not perform reverse circulation drilling.

During the MAE programs, core was split in half using a diamond
saw and was sampled over 1 metre intervals unless a different interval was required because of the geology. During the Andean programs, core samples collected for analysis were typically 1 metre in length, but ranged from 20 centimetres to 3 metres.
Our exploration sampling protocols call for samples to be between 0.5 and 2 metres in length. Samples within the vein are typically 1 metre or less and are often based on differing vein textures. Samples adjacent to the mineralized zones may be up
to 2 metres. Sampling protocols for our underground infill samples are to collect samples between 0.3 metres and 1 metre in both un-mineralized and mineralized rock.

The quantity and quality of the lithological, geotechnical, collar, and down-hole survey data collected during the Andean and Goldcorp exploration and
infill drill programs are sufficient to support Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation.

Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification

Several independent, primary assay laboratories have been used for routine analyses of surface drilling samples over the Project history, and include
SGS Laboratories, Bondar Clegg Laboratories (now ALS Chemex), Alex Stewart Argentina, and Acme Laboratories (now Bureau Veritas). Laboratories are certified and independent of Goldcorp.



- 70 -



---

In mid-2010, sample preparation was moved to the project site using
an onsite laboratory staffed by two Acme employees who were assisted by two of our employees. Onsite preparation ceased in 2013 and is once again carried out at Acmes Mendoza laboratory.

From June 2013 until December 2016 all underground drill and mine samples were assayed for gold and silver at the
on-site laboratory located at Eureka Camp. The on-site laboratory obtained ISO 9001:2008 certification in June 2013 and is not independent.

Beginning in January 2016, all underground diamond drill and mine production samples have been prepared and assayed at Alex Stewart Assayers Argentina
SA Perito Moreno facility. This laboratory is independent and is ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 14001:2004 certified. Plant samples will continue to be analyzed on site.

The sample preparation method typically consists of drying, pulverizing and splitting to generate a 200 gram pulp for assay. The pulverization standard
has varied from 85% passing -200 mesh to 95% passing 150 mesh. The underground pulverization standard is 90% -140 mesh. At the Eureka Camp
on-site laboratory and the Alex Stewart Assayers Argentina SA laboratory in Perito Moreno, samples are analyzed using a 50 gram fire assay to determine gold and silver values.

Assay procedures by Alex Stewart Assayers Argentina SA for the initial Andean drill programs included fire assay on a 50 gram sample using an atomic
absorption finish, and a 34 element inductively-coupled plasma package. Samples assaying >10 g/t gold were re-assayed using a gravimetric finish.

From the last Andean drilling phase onwards through our programs to present, Acme has analyzed for gold by fire assay with an atomic absorption finish,
for silver by aqua regia digestion with an atomic absorption finish, and aqua regia digestion inductively-coupled plasma /mass spectrometry analysis for a multi element suite. Gold results of >10 g/t and silver results of >100 g/t are re-assayed using a fire assay with a gravimetric finish.

QA/QC measures for Andean and Goldcorp programs include
the insertion of blanks, duplicates, and both site-specific and commercially available standards. There has been a strong program of check assaying at Cerro Negro with just over 5% of all samples from 2009 to 2013 originally assayed at Acme being
submitted for re-assay to ALS Chemex.

All preparation and handling of samples at the Cerro Negro Project
site is done by our workforce, and prior to that, by Andean employees. No information regarding sample security for programs prior to those of Andean is available.

During the Andean programs, samples were placed in steel-wire-reinforced plastic bins and held on-site until a
sufficient number of samples have been collected for a shipment. Weekly, a private trucking company transported the samples directly to the Acme preparation laboratory in Mendoza, Argentina. The plastic bins were covered with an impermeable
tarpaulin that was only removed upon arrival to the laboratory. After delivery the samples were within Acmes control and they were responsible for shipping them to the Santiago analytical facility.

Currently, we place five samples in larger plastic bags or burlap sacks that are then securely closed. Shipments of samples are collected from site by
an Acme truck whenever a batch of 500 or more samples is ready and transported to the sample preparation laboratory in Mendoza, Argentina. Acme is responsible for delivering the prepared pulps to the Santiago analytical laboratory.

The most recent external data verification review was performed in 2014 and reported on an audit of the project database. The data in the Cerro Negro
database for the Bajo Negro, Mariana Central, Mariana Norte, San Marcos and Vein Zone vein systems and other exploration targets were found to be exceptionally free of errors. Errors that were identified were not material and were easily able to be
investigated and corrected. The data are of very good quality, reliable and can be depended on for resource estimation.



- 71 -



---

The review investigated QA/QC results from surface exploration and underground infill drilling programs and
concluded:



| |  |  | Results indicate that the analytical procedures employed by the analytical laboratories are generally reliable and
repeatable;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | Accuracy and precision are acceptable;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------

| |  |  | Analyses of standards and duplicates indicate that there are no significant biases to suggest over or under-reporting of
assay values; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | The QA/QC protocols we used are in keeping with best industry practices and adequate to support Mineral Resource
estimation and mine planning.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The quality of the analytical data are sufficiently reliable to support Mineral Resource and
Mineral Reserve estimation and that sampling, analysis, and security are generally performed in accordance with exploration best practices and industry standards.

A number of data verification programs and audits have been performed over Cerro Negros history, primarily in support of technical reports, but
also to verify that data collected were sufficiently reliable for the purposes of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation.

Mineral Reserve and Mineral
Resource Estimates

The following table sets forth the Mineral Reserve estimation for the Cerro Negro Mine effective June 30, 2016:

Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)

|                  |  |                   |  |                           |  |                             |  |                           |  |                            
|----------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                  |  |                   |  | Grade                     |  | Contained Metal            
|Category          |  | Tonnes
(millions) |  | Gold
(grams per    tonne) |  | Silver
(grams per    tonne) |  | Gold
(millions of
ounces) |  | Silver
(millions of
ounces)
|                  |  |                   |  |                           | 
|Proven            |  | 5.02              |  | 9.86                      |  | 82.67                       |  | 1.59                      |  | 13.35                      
|Probable          |  | 11.64             |  | 8.72                      |  | 59.81                       |  | 3.26                      |  | 22.38                      
|Proven + Probable |  | 16.66             |  | 9.06                      |  | 66.70                       |  | 4.85                      |  | 35.73                      



|(1) | The Mineral Reserves for the Cerro Negro Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision of
Andrew Tripp, P.E., Technical Services Manager, Cerro Negro, at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The Mineral Reserves are classified as Proven and Probable, and are based on the CIM Definition Standards.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Mineral Reserves are estimated based on a gold price of $1,200 per ounce and a silver price of $18.00 per ounce.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | For underground estimates, a cut-off grade ranging from 5.00 to 5.37 g/t gold
equivalent is used as an economic indicator only, and is dependent upon deposit location. Operating costs used for cut-off grade derivation range from $172.00 to $176.00 per tonne (underground mining: range
$6071 per tonne; processing: $39.00 per tonne; G&A: $66.00 per tonne) comprise of $6 per tonne mining cost, $25 per tonne processing cost for the Vein Zone open pit with $21 per ounce G&A costs. The Vein Zone cut-off grade is 0.97 g/t gold equivalent. The Vein Zone cut-off grade is 1.13 g/t gold equivalent.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | The estimated gold metallurgical recovery rate is 95% for Eureka, Mariana Central and Mariana Central SE / Emilia
deposits, and 90% for Mariana Norte, Mariana Norte Este Beta, San Marcos, Bajo Negro and Vein Zone deposits. Silver metallurgical recovery is estimated at 83% for Eureka, Mariana Central, and Mariana Central SE / Emilia deposits; 75% for San Marcos
and Bajo Negro deposits, 70% for Mariana Norte and Mariana Norte Este Beta deposits, and 60% for the Vein Zone deposit.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Underground mining dilution assumes a minimum mining width of 4.5 metre and a minimum 1.25 metre overbreak on each stope
sidewall depending upon zone, and dilution grade estimated from the block model. Open pit mining dilution is taken into account through the chosen block size which represents the expected SMU.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | Underground mineral reserves take into account a 95% mining recovery and open pit mining 100% recovery.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(8) | Tonnages and ounces are rounded to the nearest 10,000 tonnes and 10,000 ounces respectively, grades are rounded to two
decimal places; numbers may not sum due to rounding.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We believe that the major risk factors that can affect the Mineral Reserves
estimates are: exchange rate assumptions, capital and operating cost assumptions, royalties and taxes, geotechnical stability, dilution assumptions, environmental and permitting status, and maintaining a social license to operate.



- 72 -



---

The following table sets forth the Mineral Resource estimations for the Cerro Negro Mine effective
June 30, 2016:

Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)

(excluding Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves)

|                     |  |                  |  |                           |  |                             |  |                           |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|                     |  |                  |  | Grade                     |  | Contained Metal            
|Category             |  | Tonnes
(million) |  | Gold
(grams per    tonne) |  | Silver
(grams per    tonne) |  | Gold
(millions of
ounces) |  | Silver
(millions    of ounces)
|                     |  |                  |  |                           | 
|Measured             |  | 1.39             |  | 6.36                      |  | 70.84                       |  | 0.28                      |  | 3.16                          
|Indicated            |  | 5.46             |  | 6.20                      |  | 47.42                       |  | 1.09                      |  | 8.32                          
|Measured + Indicated |  | 6.84             |  | 6.23                      |  | 52.17                       |  | 1.37                      |  | 11.48                         
|Inferred             |  | 2.13             |  | 4.15                      |  | 32.06                       |  | 0.28                      |  | 2.19                          



|(1) | The Mineral Resources for the Cerro Negro Mine set out in the table above have been prepared under the supervision of
Guillermo Pareja, P.Geo., Manager of Mineral Resources at Goldcorp, and a qualified person under NI 43-101. The Mineral Resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred, and are based on the
CIM Definition Standards.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | All Mineral Resources are reported exclusive of those Mineral Resources that were converted to Mineral Reserves and do
not include dilution.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Mineral Resources are not known with the same degree of certainty as Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated
economic viability.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Mineral Resources are reported at a gold price of $1,400 per ounce, a silver price of $20 per ounce. Mineral Resources
are defined within LerchsGrossmann pit shells or have been confined using appropriate underground mining constraints.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | The cut-off grade for the Vein Zone open pit is 0.82 g/t gold equivalent. The cut-off grade for the underground deposits ranges from 3.91 to 4.47 g/t gold equivalent. For equivalency purposes a silver:gold ratio of between 80.12 and 90.00 silver to one gold is used for the underground
deposits, depending on the deposit; a silver:gold ratio of 105 is used for the Vein Zone open pit deposit. Operating costs used for cut-off grade derivation for the underground deposits range from $158.00 to
$171.00 per tonne (range $62 to $75 per tonne mining; processing: $37.00 per tonne; G&A: $59.00 per tonne). Operating costs used for cut-off grade calculations for the Vein Zone comprise $6 per tonne
mining cost, $25 per tonne processing cost, and $21 per ounce G&A costs.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | The estimated gold metallurgical recovery rate is 95% for Eureka, Mariana Central and Mariana Central SE/Emilia deposits,
and 90% for Mariana Norte, Mariana Norte Este Beta, San Marcos, Bajo Negro and Vein Zone deposits. Silver metallurgical recovery is estimated at 83% for Eureka, Mariana Central, and Mariana Central SE/Emilia deposits; 75% for San Marcos and Bajo
Negro deposits, 70% for Mariana Norte and Mariana Norte Este Beta deposits, and 60% for the Vein Zone deposit.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | Tonnages and ounces are rounded to the nearest 10,000 tonnes and 10,000 ounces respectively, grades are rounded to two
decimal places.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(8) | Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and
contained metal content.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(9) | Tonnage and grade measurements are in metric units. Contained gold and silver ounces are reported as troy ounces.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Factors that may affect the estimates include metal prices and exchange rate assumptions; assumptions which are to constrain
Mineral Resources, including mining, processing and general and administrative costs, metal recoveries, geotechnical and hydrogeological assumptions; and assumptions that the operation will maintain the social licence to operate.

Mining Operations

With the exception of the Vein Zone, all
deposits will be mined by underground mining methods.

A combination of transverse and longitudinal long-hole sublevel stoping methods with cemented
rock backfill are currently being used at the Eureka and Mariana Central mines. The determination of which method is used is made based on geometries and the rock quality. Generally, transverse stoping is used in wider ore zones and areas where high
grades along the contact require parallel drilling. Longitudinal stoping is used whenever practical in narrower zones to reduce development requirements. In certain areas, a modified Avoca mining method is used, which constitutes a longitudinal
long-hole method with a rolling backfill front following the mining of ore in a single direction along strike. These methods are planned to be used to mine the other underground deposits at Cerro Negro Mine.



- 73 -



---

Ore extraction is carried out by loadhauldump vehicles with capacities ranging from 4.0 cubic
metres to 5.4 cubic metres. These units muck the ore from the stopes and haul it to a temporary stockpile located in the haulage drift or directly to trucks. Then the ore is loaded into trucks with capacities between 33 tonnes and 40 tonnes to be
hauled to the surface and dumped, depending on grade, into high-, medium-, low- or marginal-grade stockpiles. The ore is then transported to the plant in haul trucks with capacities of 35 tonnes to 40 tonnes.

The mine plan for the Vein Zone deposit considers a two-phase open pit operation, in order to allow quicker
access to ore and a smoother ore flow and stripping ratio over the life of the pit. Both phases will be mined concurrently with the underground mines. The Vein Zone will be mined using standard open pit mining methods using drilling, blasting,
loading and hauling operations at a scale suitable for selective ore mining.

Surface mining is not planned in 2017 and Cerro Negro Mine will
continue to evaluate potential surface mining opportunities to provide a supplemental source of additional mill feed.

The mine plan includes
maintaining a stockpile of ore on the run-of-mine pad near the crusher. At June 30, 2016, the surface ore stockpile consisted of 39,000 tonnes.

Waste storage has been designed for Eureka, Baja Negro, Mariana Norte, Mariana Central and San Marcos. During backfilling, the waste stockpiles will be
totally consumed. Waste from Vein Zones LOM will be stored in a single waste dump. We are not aware of any significant environmental, social or permitting issues that would prevent continued exploitation of the Cerro Negro Mine deposits.

Processing and Recovery Operations

The Cerro Negro
processing plant consists of conventional metallurgical technology suitable for the style of ore mineralization. The process plant and associated service facilities process
run-of-mine ore delivered to the primary crusher. The process encompasses crushing and grinding of the
run-of-mine ore, agitated leaching, counter-current decantation, solution clarification, zinc precipitation and smelting to produce gold/silver bars that are shipped to
a refinery for further processing. The counter-current decantation tailings are washed to recover cyanide prior to being detoxified and pumped to the tailings storage facility. The plant commenced initial feed on July 5, 2014 and first gold was
poured on July 25, 2014. The plant is expected to process 4,000 metric tonnes per day once the mines have ramped-up to full production capacity.

LOM production as of December 31, 2016 was 2.08 Mt processed at 13.82 g/t gold and 161.3 g/t silver. Approximately 871,000 ounces of gold and
9.2 million ounces of silver have been poured over the life of mine as of December 31, 2016. This only includes production after commencement of commercial production on January 1, 2015.

The Cerro Negro Mine produces and sells a gold and silver doré to generate revenue. Cerro Negro Mines bullion is sold to our trading entity
located in Switzerland. After the refining process, the trading entitys in-house marketing experts sell bullion on the spot market at prices fixed by the London Bullion Market Association.

Infrastructure, Permitting and Compliance Activities

Water
for potable and industrial use at Cerro Negro Mine is supplied from bored wells at various locations. Permanent power from the national grid was achieved on February 2, 2015. The Cerro Negro Mine has no formal settlements within its boundaries
and the closest towns are Perito Moreno (population 4,200), located approximately 75 kilometres by road, and Las Heras (population 12,206), which is located 107 kilometres to the northeast and can provide basic services. Most supplies and services
are sourced from Caleta Olivia, Comodoro Rivadavia or Buenos Aires. There is an available workforce that requires continuous training.



- 74 -



---

All required Argentine State and Federal permits have been obtained. Compliance with the permits is closely
monitored by our workforce and government personnel. Applications for new permits are submitted in a timely manner to ensure no stoppages because of the lack of permits.

Environmental baseline studies and on-going environmental monitoring exceed the minimum requirements of the
applicable regulatory agencies. Reporting is current and in accordance with Argentine law.

Capital and Operating Costs

Capital cost estimates are based on the latest mine construction data, budgetary figures and quotes provided by suppliers. Capital cost estimates
include funding for infrastructure, mobile equipment, development and permitting, and miscellaneous costs. Infrastructure requirements were incorporated into the estimates as needed. Sustaining capital costs reflect current price trends. Capital
cost estimates are based on the 2017 LOM budget.



| |              |      |        |                          |  | 
| | ------------ | ---- | ------ | ------------------------ |  | 
| |              | Area |        | Life-of-Mine ($ million) |  | 
| | Sustaining   |      | $669.0 |                         
| | Expansionary |      | $31.5  |                         
| | Total        |      | $700.5 |                         

Operating cost estimates are based on the 2017 LOM budget, which includes estimates from first principles for major
items and allowances or estimates for minor costs. The estimated average annual operating cost is $160 per tonne once the operations reach steady-state production. This consists of $33 per tonne for processing, $62 per tonne for mining, $64 per
tonne for general and administrative costs, and $1 per tonne for other costs. Inflation of future capital and operating costs in local currency is expected to be offset by devaluation of the local currency with respect to the US$.



| |                   |      |         |                            |  | 
| | ----------------- | ---- | ------- | -------------------------- |  | 
| |                   | Area |         | Life-of-Mine ($ per tonne) |  | 
| | Process Plant     |      | $33.00  |                           
| | Mining Operations |      | $62.00  |                           
| | G&A & Other       |      | $65.00  |                           
| | Total             |      | $160.00 |                           

Exploration, Development and Production

Significant exploration potential remains within the Cerro Negro Mine. Regionally, the epithermal
low-sulphidation goldsilver-bearing quartz veins occur in two belts. Significant potential exists to increase the known mineralization of the West Belt by continued drilling of the currently known
goldsilver quartz veins. Exploration of known veins in the East Belt is also continuing.

Continued geologic mapping and prospecting between
the East and West belts in the central portion of the property will focus on extending mineralized zones beneath relatively thin post-mineral cover dominated by alluvium and lacustrine sedimentary units.

The veins for which Mineral Resources have been estimated to date are still expected to have potential for expansion either along strike or down dip.

At the Cerro Negro Mine, gold production for 2017 is expected to be 410,000 ounces. See Risk Factors  Our financial projections rely on
estimates of future production and estimates of future production may not be reliable, which could have a negative impact on our future cash flows, business, results of operations and financial condition.

RISK FACTORS



- 75 -



---

Our business is the operation, exploration, development and acquisition of mining properties. Due to the
high-risk nature of our business, our operations are speculative. The risk factors described below are not the only risks and uncertainties that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider
immaterial may also impair our business operations. These risk factors could materially affect our future operating results and could cause actual events to differ materially from those described in our forward-looking statements.

Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk that cannot be eliminated, which can adversely impact our business profitability
and financial performance.

Our operations are subject to all of the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration, development
and production of gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc including unusual and unexpected geologic formations, seismic activity, rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and
removal of material, any of which could result in damage to, or destruction of, mines and other producing facilities, damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability. Mining and milling operations are subject to hazards
such as equipment failure or failure of retaining dams around tailings disposal areas which may result in environmental pollution and consequent liability.

It is impossible to ensure that the exploration or development programs planned by us or any of our joint venture partners will result in a
profitable commercial mining operation.

The exploration for and development of mineral deposits also involves significant risks. Few
properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses are typically required to locate and establish Mineral Reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a
particular site. Our ability to maintain, or increase, our annual production of gold, silver, copper, lead, and zinc depends in significant part on our ability to bring these projects into production and to expand existing mines. We utilize the
operating history of our existing mines to derive estimates of future operating costs and capital requirements, but such estimates may differ materially from actual operating results at new mines or at expansions of existing mines.

Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, which include, among other things, the following:



| | ● |  | the interpretation of geological data obtained from drill holes and other sampling techniques;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | feasibility studies (which include estimates of cash operating costs based upon anticipated tonnage and grades of ore to
be mined and processed);
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and metallurgy; expected recovery rates of metals from the
ore;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | proximity to infrastructure and labour; the availability and cost of water and power; anticipated climatic conditions;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | cyclical metal prices; fluctuations in inflation and currency exchange rates;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | higher input commodity and labour costs; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and
exporting of minerals and environmental protection.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some of our development projects are also subject to the successful
completion of final feasibility studies, issuance of necessary permits and other governmental approvals and receipt of adequate financing. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of any of these factors
may adversely affect our business.

The actual operating results of our development projects may differ materially from those anticipated, and
uncertainties related to operations are even greater in the case of development projects. Future development activities may not result in the expansion or replacement of current production with new production, or one or more of these new projects
may be less profitable than currently anticipated or may



- 76 -



---

not be profitable at all, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

Our business is largely concentrated in a single industry and, as a result, our business may be negatively impacted by fluctuations in the gold
mining industry generally.

We are concentrated in the gold mining industry, and as such, our profitability will be sensitive to changes in,
and our performance will depend to a greater extent on, the overall condition of the gold mining industry. We may be susceptible to an increased risk of loss, including losses due to adverse occurrences affecting us more than the market as a whole,
as a result of the fact that our operations are concentrated in the gold mining sector.

Decreases in commodity prices could render our
business no longer economically viable.

The majority of our revenues are derived from the sale of gold and silver, and to a lesser extent,
copper, lead and zinc. The price of our Common Shares, our financial results and exploration, and our development and mining activities in the future may be materially adversely affected by declines in the price of gold, silver, copper, lead and
zinc. Gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, such as the sale or purchase of metals by various central banks and financial institutions, interest rates, exchange rates,
inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the value of the United States dollar and foreign currencies, global and regional supply and demand, and the political and economic conditions of major metals-producing and metals-consuming countries throughout
the world. The prices of gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc have fluctuated widely in recent years, and future price declines could cause continued development of and commercial production from our properties to be uneconomic. Depending on the
price of gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc, cash flow from mining operations may not be sufficient and we could be forced to discontinue production and may lose our interest in, or may be forced to sell, some of our properties. Future production
from our mining properties is dependent on gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc prices that are adequate to make these properties economically viable.

Decreases in commodity prices could negatively impact our Mineral Reserve calculations and, therefore, our results of operations.

If our Mineral Reserve calculations and life-of-mine plans are required
to be revised using significantly lower gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc prices, as a result of a decrease in commodity prices, this could result in material write-downs of our investment in mining properties and increased amortization,
reclamation and closure charges.

Decreases in commodity prices could impact the feasibility of our projects.

Declining commodity prices can impact operations by requiring a reassessment of the feasibility of a particular project. Such a reassessment may be the
result of a management decision or may be required under financing arrangements related to a particular project. Even if the project is ultimately determined to be economically viable, the need to conduct such a reassessment may cause substantial
delays or may interrupt operations until the reassessment can be completed.

Our financial projections rely on estimates of future production
and estimates of future production may not be reliable, which could have a negative impact on our future cash flows, business, results of operations and financial condition.

We prepare estimates and projections of our future production. Any such information is forward-looking and no assurance can be given that such estimates
will be achieved. These estimates are based on existing mine plans and other assumptions which change from time to time, including the availability, accessibility, sufficiency and quality of ore, our costs of production, our ability to sustain and
increase production levels, the sufficiency of our infrastructure, the performance of our workforce and equipment,



- 77 -



---

our ability to maintain and obtain mining interests and permits and our compliance with existing and future laws and regulations. Our actual production may vary from estimates for a variety of
reasons, including: actual ore mined varying from estimates of grade, tonnage, dilution and metallurgical and other characteristics; short-term operating factors relating to the ore reserves, such as the need for sequential development of orebodies
and the processing of new or different ore grades; revisions to mine plans; unusual or unexpected orebody formations; risks and hazards associated with mining; natural phenomena, such as inclement weather conditions, water availability, floods, and
earthquakes; and unexpected labour shortages, strikes, local community opposition or blockades. Failure to achieve the estimated forecasts could have an adverse impact on our future cash flows, business, results of operations and financial
condition.

We may be unable to maintain or increase our annual production of gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc.

Although our activities are primarily directed towards mining operations, our activities also include the exploration for, and development of, mineral
deposits. We must continually explore to replace and expand our Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources as our mines produce gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc. Our ability to maintain or increase our annual production of gold, silver, copper, lead
and zinc depends in significant part on our ability to find new Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, to bring new mines into production, and to expand Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources at existing mines. We can provide no assurance that we
will be able to maintain or increase our annual production, bring new mines into production or expand the Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources at our existing mines.

The viability and profitability of our business are exposed to risk as a result of the political uncertainties inherent in some of the foreign
jurisdictions in which we operate.

The majority of our foreign operations are conducted in Mexico, Argentina, the Dominican Republic,
Guatemala, and Chile, and, as such, our operations are exposed to various levels of political, economic and other risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties vary from country to country and include, but are not limited to:



| | ● |  | terrorism;
| | - |  | ----------

| | ● |  | hostage taking;
| | - |  | ---------------

| | ● |  | military repression;
| | - |  | --------------------

| | ● |  | expropriation;
| | - |  | --------------

| | ● |  | extreme fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | high rates of inflation;
| | - |  | ------------------------

| | ● |  | labour unrest;
| | - |  | --------------

| | ● |  | the risks of war or civil unrest;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------

| | ● |  | renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions, licenses, permits and contracts; ability of governments to
unilaterally alter agreements; government imposed supply laws, including laws establishing, among other things, profit margins, production quotas, maximum and minimum price levels and the ability to confiscate merchandise in certain circumstances;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | surface land access issues;
| | - |  | ---------------------------

| | ● |  | illegal mining;
| | - |  | ---------------

| | ● |  | changes in taxation policies, regulations and laws;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | restrictions on foreign exchange and repatriation; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | changing political conditions, currency controls and governmental regulations that favour or require the awarding of
contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The occurrence of mining regime changes in both developed and developing countries adds uncertainties that cannot be accurately predicted and any future
material adverse changes in government policies or legislation in the jurisdictions in which we operate that affect foreign ownership, mineral exploration, development or mining activities, may affect our viability and profitability.



- 78 -



---

Our operations are subject to economic uncertainties as a result of our foreign operations.

As governments continue to struggle with deficits and concerns over the effects of depressed economies, this has resulted in the mining and
metals sector being targeted to raise revenue. Governments are continually assessing the fiscal terms of the economic rent for a mining company to exploit resources in their countries. Numerous countries, including, but not limited to, Argentina,
Australia, Brazil, Chile, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and Venezuela, have implemented changes to their respective mining regimes that reflect increased government control or participation in the mining sector, including, but
not limited to, changes of law affecting foreign ownership and takeovers, mandatory government participation, taxation and royalties, working conditions, rates of exchange, exchange control, exploration licensing, export duties, repatriation of
income or return of capital, environmental protection, as well as requirements for local goods, supplies and employment of local and community staff or contractors or other benefits to be provided to local residents. The occurrence of the various
factors and uncertainties related to the economic risks of operating in foreign jurisdictions cannot be accurately predicted and could have a material adverse effect on our operations or profitability.

Our operations in multiple tax jurisdictions increase our susceptibility to sudden tax changes, which can have a material adverse effect on our
profitability.

The introduction of new tax laws, regulations or rules, or changes to, or differing interpretation of, or application of,
existing tax laws, regulations or rules in Canada, Barbados, Switzerland, Mexico, Argentina, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala and Chile or any of the countries in which our operations or business is located, could result in an increase in our
taxes, or other governmental charges, duties or impositions. No assurance can be given that new tax laws, rules or regulations will not be enacted or that existing tax laws will not be changed, interpreted or applied in a manner that could result in
our profits being subject to additional taxation or that could otherwise have a material adverse effect on us.

Changes in mining or
investment policies or shifts in political attitude in Canada, Mexico, Argentina, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Chile, Barbados or Switzerland may adversely affect our operations or profitability.

Operations may be affected to varying degrees by government regulations with respect to, but not limited to: restrictions on production; price controls;
export controls; import restrictions, such as restrictions applicable to, among other things, equipment, services and supplies; currency remittance; income taxes; expropriation of property; foreign investment; maintenance of mineral claims;
environmental legislation; land use; surface land access; land claims of local people; water use; and mine safety. Failure to comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral right applications and tenure,
could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements, or the imposition of additional local or foreign parties as partners with carried or other interests and may adversely affect our operations or profitability.

Failure to achieve estimates or material increases in costs could have an adverse impact on our future cash flows, business, results of operations
and financial condition.

We prepare budgets and estimates of cash costs and capital costs of production for each of our operations and our
main costs relate to material costs, workforce and contractor costs, energy costs and closure and reclamation costs. As a result of the substantial expenditures involved in the development of mineral projects and the fluctuation of costs over time,
development projects and operating mines may be prone to material cost overruns. Our actual costs may vary from estimates for a variety of reasons, including: short-term operating factors; revisions to mine plans; risks and hazards associated with
mining; natural phenomena, such as inclement weather conditions, water availability, floods, and earthquakes; and unexpected labour issues, labour shortages, strikes or community blockades. Operational costs may also be affected by a variety of
factors, including: changing waste-to-ore ratios, ore grade metallurgy, labour costs, cost of commodities, general inflationary pressures and currency exchange rates.
Many of these factors are beyond our control.



- 79 -



---

Furthermore, delays in the construction and commissioning of mining projects or other technical
difficulties may result in even further capital expenditures being required. Any delay in the development of a project, or cost overruns or operational difficulties once the project is fully developed, may have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.

Recently opened mines may never reach full production, which would have an adverse
effect on our cash flows and results of operations.

Our recently opened mines that commenced commercial production in 2015, the Cerro Negro
Mine and the Éléonore Mine, and our expansion projects are subject to risks associated with new mine development, which may result in delays in the start-up of mining operations, delays in
existing operations and unanticipated costs. Our production forecasts are based on full production being achieved at all of our mines, including the mines that commenced commercial production in 2015, and our ability to achieve and maintain full
production rates at these mines is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Production from these mines may be lower than anticipated if the anticipated full production rate cannot be achieved which could adversely affect our cash flows and
results of operations.

Changes in laws could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our mining, processing, development and mineral exploration activities are subject to various laws governing prospecting, development, production,
taxes, labour standards and occupational health, mine safety, toxic substances, land use, water use, land claims of local people and other matters. No assurance can be given that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules
and regulations will not be applied in a manner which could limit or curtail production or development. Amendments to current laws and regulations governing operations and activities of mining and milling or more stringent implementation thereof
could have a material adverse impact on us. In addition, changes to laws regarding mining royalties or taxes, or other elements of a countrys fiscal regime, may adversely affect our costs of operations and financial results.

We do not have direct ownership or possession rights to use the surface of the lands for our Mexican mining operations.

Article 27 of the Mexican Constitution and subsequent legislation established the ejido and communal landholding as forms of land tenure in
Mexico. There are more than 20 ejido communities in the vicinity of our Mexican mining operations and ejido lands cover most of the lands used by us for our current mining operations at Peñasquito and Los Filos Mines. We enter into temporary
occupation agreements ranging from five to 30 years with the ejido communities, which allow us to use the surface of the lands for our mining operations. In Mexico, mining rights that are covered under a concession do not include direct ownership or
possession rights over the surface, or surface access, and at any particular time we may be involved in negotiations with various ejido communities to enter into new temporary occupation agreements or other surface access agreements or amend
existing agreements. Failure to reach new agreements or disputes regarding existing agreements may cause, blockades, suspension of operations, delays to projects, and on occasion, may lead to legal disputes.

Mining operations involve health and personal safety hazards that could adversely affect our reputation, business and future operations.

Workers involved in our operations are subject to many inherent health and safety risks and hazards, including, but not limited to, rock
bursts, cave-ins, flood, falls of ground, chemical hazards, mineral dust and gases, use of explosives, noise, electricity and moving equipment (especially heavy equipment) and slips and falls, which could
result in occupational illness or health issues, personal injury, and loss of life, and/or facility and workforce evacuation, such as the fatality on April 14, 2016 at the Marlin Mine. These risks cannot be eliminated and may adversely affect
our reputation, business and future operations.

Our business is affected by the global economy.



- 80 -



---

Market events and conditions, including the disruptions in the international credit markets and other
financial systems, in China, Japan and Europe, along with political instability in the Middle East and Russia and falling currency prices expressed in United States dollars have resulted in commodity prices remaining volatile. These conditions have
also caused a loss of confidence in global credit markets, excluding the United States, resulting in the collapse of, and government intervention in, major banks, financial institutions and insurers and creating a climate of greater volatility,
tighter regulations, less liquidity, widening credit spreads, less price transparency, increased credit losses and tighter credit conditions. Notwithstanding various actions by governments, concerns about the general condition of the capital
markets, financial instruments, banks and investment banks, insurers and other financial institutions caused the broader credit markets to be volatile and interest rates to remain at historical lows. These events are illustrative of the effect that
events beyond our control may have on commodity prices, demand for metals, including gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc, availability of credit, investor confidence, and general financial market liquidity, all of which may adversely affect our
business.

We are exposed to liquidity and counterparty risks.

We are exposed to liquidity and various counterparty risks including, but not limited to:



| | ● |  | financial institutions that hold our cash;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | companies that have payables to us, including concentrate customers;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | our insurance providers;
| | - |  | ------------------------

| | ● |  | our lenders;
| | - |  | ------------

| | ● |  | our other banking counterparties;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------

| | ● |  | companies that have received deposits from us for the future delivery of equipment; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | joint venture partners.
| | - |  | -----------------------

We are also exposed to liquidity risks in meeting our capital expenditure requirements in instances where cash positions are unable to be maintained or
appropriate financing is unavailable. These factors may impact our ability to obtain loans and other credit facilities in the future and, if obtained, on terms favourable to us. Furthermore, actions taken by central banks to impact fiscal and
monetary policies have increased levels of volatility and market turmoil. As a result of this uncertainty, our planned growth could be adversely impacted and the trading price of our securities could either be adversely affected.

Our failure to strictly comply with anti-corruption laws could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and result of operations.

Our operations are governed by, and involve interactions with, many levels of government in numerous countries. We are required to comply
with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, including the Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as well as similar laws in the countries in which we conduct business. In recent years, there
has been a general increase in both the frequency of enforcement and the severity of penalties under such laws, resulting in greater scrutiny and punishment to companies convicted of violating anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. Furthermore, a
company may be found liable for violations by not only its employees, but also by its contractors and third party agents. Our internal procedures and programs may not always be effective in ensuring that we, our employees, contractors or third party
agents will comply strictly with such laws. If we become subject to an enforcement action or in violation of such laws, this may have a material adverse effect on our reputation, result in significant penalties, fines and/or sanctions imposed on us,
and/or have a material adverse effect on our operations.

Our failure to strictly comply with Canadas Extractive Sector Transparency
Measures Act could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and result of operations.

The Canadian Extractive Sector Transparency
Measures Act (ESTMA), which became effective June 1, 2015, requires public disclosure of payments to governments by mining and oil and gas companies engaged in the commercial development of oil, gas and minerals who are
either publicly listed in Canada or with business or assets in Canada. Mandatory annual reporting is required for extractive companies



- 81 -



---

with respect to payments made to foreign and domestic governments at all levels, including entities established by two or more governments, and including Aboriginal groups, although reporting on
payments to Canadian First Nations will commence in 2018 for payments made in 2017. ESTMA requires reporting on the payments of any taxes, royalties, fees, production entitlements, bonuses, dividends, infrastructure improvement payments, and any
other prescribed payment over C$100,000. Failure to report, false reporting or structuring payments to avoid reporting may result in fines of up to C$250,000 (which may be concurrent). We commence reporting in 2017. If we become subject to an
enforcement action or in violation of ESTMA, this may result in significant penalties, fines and/or sanctions imposed on us resulting in a material adverse effect on our reputation.

Our operations in Argentina are susceptible to risk as a result of economic and political instability in Argentina.

There continue to be risks relating to the uncertain and unpredictable political and economic environment in Argentina. Inflation remains a challenge in
Argentina. Estimations for 2017 expect a reduction of inflation, which is expected to range between 20 to 25%. Maintaining operating revenues in Argentine pesos could expose us to the risks of peso devaluation and high domestic inflation, especially
after the mid-term elections.

At the Provincial level, in 2016, as a consequence of the governments
lack of funds to pay public wages, finance public works and community projects, mining companies had been pressed to sign agreements by which they covenanted to pay a special royalty up to 2% above the royalty established under applicable law.
During 2017 we expect the situation to be similar and the pressure on mining companies is therefore expected to continue. The poor economic situation of the Provincial Government has triggered ongoing roadblocks throughout the province by local
community members and unions. We can provide no assurance that disruptions from roadblocks will not occur in the future that could affect access to, and operations at, the Cerro Negro Mine.

In addition, on September 13, 2016, we experienced a work stoppage by miners represented by the Asociacion Obrera Minera Argentina
(AOMA), Province of Santa Cruz delegation at the Cerro Negro Mine. We can provide no assurance that issues with the AOMA or other unions will not occur in the future that could adversely affect operations at the Cerro Negro Mine.

Violence in some jurisdictions negatively impacts our ability to conduct business in such locations.

In recent years, criminal activity and violence has increased in Mexico. Violence between the drug cartels and human trafficking organizations and
violent confrontations with authorities has steadily increased. As well, incidents of violent crime, kidnapping for ransom and extortion by organized crime have increased. Many incidents of crime and violence go unreported and law enforcement
authorities efforts to reduce criminal activity are challenged by a lack of resources, corruption and the power of organized crime. Incidents of criminal activity, trespass, theft and vandalism have occasionally affected our employees,
contractors and their families. We can provide no assurance that security incidents, in the future, will not have a material adverse effect on our operations, especially if criminal activity and violence continue to escalate. In addition, our
response to criminal activities can give rise to additional risks should they not be carried out consistently with international standards relating to the use of force and respect for human rights. Such incidents and failure to comply with our human
rights standards may halt or delay production, increase operating costs; result in harm to employees, contractors, visitors or community members; decrease operational efficiency due to employee absenteeism and other factors; increase community
tensions or otherwise adversely affect our ability to conduct business.

Our current and future operations are subject to a risk that one or
more groups of indigenous people may oppose continued operation, further development, or new development of our projects and mines. Such opposition may be directed through legal or administrative proceedings or expressed in manifestations such as
protests, roadblocks or other forms of public expression against our activities, and may have a negative impact on our reputation and operations.



- 82 -



---

Some of our operations are situated in areas presently or previously inhabited or used by indigenous
peoples, triggering various international and national laws, codes, resolutions, conventions, guidelines, and imposing obligations on government and companies to respect the rights of indigenous people. These may include a mandate that government
consult with communities surrounding our projects and mines regarding actions affecting local stakeholders, prior to granting us mining rights, permits or approvals. Applicable conventions such as the ILO Convention 169, which has been ratified by
Argentina, Chile, Guatemala, and Mexico, is an example of such an international convention. Examples of developments in this area include the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People and the International Finance
Corporations revised Performance Standard 7, which requires governments to obtain the free, prior, and informed consent of indigenous peoples who may be affected by government action (such as the granting of mining concessions or approval of
mine permits).

There is an increasing level of public concern relating to the perceived effect of mining activities on communities impacted by such
activities. The evolving expectations related to human rights, indigenous rights, environmental protection may result in opposition to our current and future operations or further development or new development of our projects and mines. Such
opposition may be directed through legal or administrative proceedings or expressed in manifestations such as protests, roadblocks or other forms of public expression against our activities, and may have a negative impact on our reputation and
operations.

Opposition by any of the aforementioned groups to our operations may require modification of, or preclude the operation or development
of, our projects and mines or may require us to enter into agreements with such groups or local governments with respect to our projects and mines, in some cases, causing increased cost and considerable delays to the advancement of our projects.

Compliance with environmental laws, including changes to such laws, could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our operations are subject to environmental regulation in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. These regulations mandate, among other things,
the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation. They also set out limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner that will
likely, in the future, require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of
responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Continuing issues with tailings dam failures at other companies operations may increase the likelihood that these stricter standards and enforcement mechanisms will be
implemented in the future. We can provide no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation will not adversely affect our results of operations. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in
enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial
actions. Parties engaged in mining operations or in the exploration or development of mineral properties may also be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or
penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations. The occurrence of any environmental violation or enforcement action may have an adverse impact on our reputation and could adversely affect our results of operations.

Furthermore, environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which we hold interests that are unknown to us at present and which have been caused
by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties.

In addition, production at certain of our mines involves the use of sodium cyanide
or other reagents and exposes rock material that could cause toxicity to the environment if released or not properly managed. Should sodium cyanide, other reagents, or contact water be improperly managed, leak or otherwise be discharged from the
containment system, we may become subject to liability for clean-up work that may not be insured. While appropriate steps are taken to prevent discharges of pollutants into the ground



- 83 -



---

water and the environment, we may become subject to liability for hazards that we may not be insured against. See -- Not all losses are adequately covered by insurance and such losses may
cause us to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect upon its financial performance and results of operations below.

Governments may impose restrictions on our ability to use current mining methods, which would have a serious and adverse impact on our results of
operations and financial condition.

There has been increased global attention and the introduction of regulations restricting or
prohibiting the use of cyanide and other hazardous substances in mineral processing activities. In addition, the use of open pit mining techniques has come under scrutiny in certain mining jurisdictions, and some governments are reviewing the use of
such methods. For example, the Argentinean Congress approved legislation that restricts mining and other industrial activities in areas where glaciers are present. In addition, several provincial governments in Argentina have adopted prohibitions on
open pit mining. If legislation restricting or prohibiting the use of cyanide or open pit mining techniques were to be adopted in a region in which we operate, there would be a serious and adverse impact on our results of operations and financial
position. Additionally, if the use of cyanide were to be restricted or prohibited in a jurisdiction in which our operations rely on the use of cyanide, it would have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition
as there are few, if any, substitutes for cyanide that are as effective in extracting gold from the ore.

Our failure to continue to source
suppliers on reasonable commercial terms could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Certain raw materials and supplies used in connection with our operations are obtained from a sole or limited group of suppliers (including, for
example, truck tires and sodium cyanide). An increase in global demand for such resources and a corresponding decrease in the suppliers inventory would likely cause unanticipated cost increases, an inability to obtain adequate supplies and
delays in delivery times, thereby adversely impacting operating costs, capital expenditures and production schedules. If a supplier is unable to adequately meet its requirements over a significant period of time and we are unable to source an
alternate third party supplier on reasonable commercial terms, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may adversely affect our business and future operations.

We are dependent on the services of key executives, including, among others, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operating Officer. The success of our operations is also dependent on our highly skilled and experienced workforce. There continues to be competition over highly skilled experienced workers. In addition, the development of new mines in
geographic areas without an established mining industry requires training of inexperienced workers to staff these new mines. The loss of these persons or our inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled, diverse employees may adversely
affect our business and future operations.

We may be unable to obtain or retain necessary permits, which could adversely affect our
operations.

Our operations in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate are subject to receiving and maintaining permits (including
environmental permits) from appropriate governmental authorities. Furthermore, prior to any development on any of our properties, we must receive permits from appropriate governmental authorities. We can provide no assurance that necessary permits
will be obtained, that previously issued permits will not be suspended for a variety of reasons, including through government or court action, or that delays will not occur in connection with obtaining all necessary permits, renewals of permits for
existing operations, or additional permits for any possible future changes to operations, or additional permits associated with new legislation. We can provide no assurance that we will continue to hold or



- 84 -



---

obtain, if required to, all permits necessary to develop or continue operating at any particular site, which could adversely affect our operations.

Changes in climate conditions could adversely affect our business and prospects.

Governments are moving to introduce climate change legislation and treaties at the international, national, state/provincial and local levels.
Regulation relating to emission levels (such as carbon taxes) and energy efficiency is becoming more stringent. If the current regulatory trend continues, we expect that this will result in increased costs at some of our operations. In addition, the
physical risks of climate change may also have an adverse effect on our operations. These risks include the following:



| | ● |  | Sea level rise: Changes in sea levels could affect ocean transportation and shipping facilities that are used to
transport supplies, equipment and workforce to our operations and products from those operations to world markets.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | Extreme weather events: Extreme weather events (such as increased frequency or intensity of hurricanes, increased snow
pack, prolonged drought) have the potential to disrupt operations at our mines. Extended disruptions to supply lines could result in interruption to production.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | Resource shortages: our facilities depend on regular supplies of consumables (diesel, tires, sodium cyanide, etc.) and
reagents to operate efficiently. In the event that the effects of climate change or extreme weather events cause prolonged disruption to the delivery of essential commodities, our production efficiency is likely to be reduced.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We can provide no assurance that efforts to mitigate the risks of climate changes will be effective and that the physical risks of climate change will
not have an adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

Unusual or infrequent weather phenomena, sabotage, community, government or
other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure, including power and water supplies, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Mining, processing, development and exploration activities depend, to one degree or another, on adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, power
sources and water supply are important determinants, which affect capital and operating costs. Unusual or infrequent weather phenomena, sabotage, community, government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure
could adversely affect our business.

A key operational risk is the availability of sufficient power and water supplies to support mining
operations. Power and water are both key to the extraction and processing of minerals and metals. Certain of our property interests are located in remote, undeveloped areas and the availability of infrastructure such as water and power at a
reasonable cost cannot be assured. Some of our properties are located in areas that have many competing demands for power and water and access to sufficient supplies is not always a guarantee. For example, a water and tailings study was completed at
the Peñasquito Mine, and as a result, the Northern Well Field project was developed and brought on-line in 2016 to provide additional water supply to the Peñasquito Mine. We can provide no
assurance that the solution implemented by us, such as the Northern Well Field project, will completely mitigate the risk of water shortages in the future.

An increase in prices of power and water supplies, including infrastructure, could also negatively affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.

Our ability to obtain a secure supply of power and water at a reasonable cost depends on many factors, including:
global and regional supply and demand; political and economic conditions; problems that can affect local supplies; delivery; and relevant regulatory regimes, all of which are outside our control. We can provide no assurance that we can obtain secure
supplies of power and water at reasonable costs at all of our facilities and the failure to do so could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.



- 85 -



---

Failure to secure power, water and access rights could result in delays and negative impacts to our
development projects.

Establishing infrastructure for our development projects will require significant resources, identification of
adequate sources of raw materials and supplies and necessary cooperation from national and regional governments, none of which can be assured. We can provide no assurance that we will secure these power, water and access rights going forward or on
reasonable terms.

Failure to provide regulatory authorities with the required financial assurances could potentially result in the closure of
one or more of our operations, which could result in a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

We are
required by various governments in jurisdictions in which we operate to provide financial assurances sufficient to allow a third party to implement approved closure and reclamation plans if we are unable to do so. These laws are complex and vary
from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The laws govern the determination of the scope and cost of the closure and reclamation obligations and the amount and forms of financial assurance.

As of December 31, 2016, we have provided the appropriate regulatory authorities with $296 million in reclamation financial assurance for mine
closure obligations in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. The amount and nature of the financial assurances are dependent upon a number of factors, including our financial condition and reclamation cost estimates. Changes to these
amounts, as well as the nature of the collateral to be provided, could significantly increase our costs, making the maintenance and development of existing and new mines less economically feasible. Regulatory authorities may also require further
financial assurances. To the extent that the value of the collateral provided to the regulatory authorities is or becomes insufficient to cover the amount of financial assurance we are required to post, we would be required to replace or supplement
the existing security with more expensive forms of security, which might include cash deposits, which would reduce our cash available for operations and financing activities. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to maintain or add to our
current level of financial assurance or that we will have sufficient capital resources to further supplement our existing security, which could result in a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Exchange rate fluctuations may adversely affect the costs that we incur in our operations.

Gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc are sold in US dollars and our costs are incurred principally in United States dollars, Canadian dollars, Mexican
pesos, Guatemalan quetzal, Dominican Republic pesos, Argentine pesos and Chilean pesos. The appreciation of non-US dollar currencies against the US dollar can increase the cost of gold, silver, copper, lead
and zinc production and capital expenditures in US dollar terms. We also hold cash and cash equivalents that are denominated in foreign currencies that are subject to currency risk. Accounts receivable and other current and non-current assets denominated in foreign currencies relate to goods and services taxes, income taxes, value-added taxes and insurance receivables. We are further exposed to currency risk through non-monetary assets and liabilities of entities whose taxable profit or tax loss are denominated in foreign currencies. We have a financial risk management policy that includes hedging our foreign exchange exposure
to reduce the risk associated with currency fluctuations but we can provide no assurance that such hedging arrangements will be adequate.

We
hold interests in joint ventures and our interest in these properties is subject to the risks normally associated with the conduct of joint ventures.

We hold an indirect 40% interest in the Pueblo Viejo Mine, with the remaining 60% interest held indirectly by Barrick, an indirect 50% interest in the
NuevaUnión Project, with the remaining 50% interest held indirectly by Teck, and an indirect 37.5% interest in the Alumbrera Mine, the other 12.5% and 50% interests held indirectly by Yamana Gold Inc. and Glencore Queensland, respectively.
The existence or occurrence of one or more of the following circumstances and events could have a material adverse



- 86 -



---

impact on our profitability or the viability of our interests held through joint ventures, which could have a material adverse impact on our future cash flows, earnings, results of operations and
financial condition:



| | ● |  | disagreements with joint venture partners on how to develop and operate mines efficiently;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | inability to exert influence over certain strategic decisions made in respect of joint venture properties;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | inability of joint venture partners to meet their obligations to the joint venture or third parties; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | litigation between joint venture partners regarding joint venture matters.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

To the extent that we are not the operator of our joint venture properties, the success of any operations will be dependent on the operators for the
timing of activities related to these properties and we will be largely unable to direct or control the activities of the operators. We are subject to the decisions made by the operator in the operation of the property, and will rely on the
operators for accurate information about the properties. We can provide no assurance that all decisions of the operators will achieve the expected goals.

We may not complete acquisition or business arrangements that we pursue, or are pursuing, on favourable terms and cannot assure that any
acquisitions or business arrangements completed will ultimately benefit our business.

As part of our business strategy, we have sought and
will continue to seek new mining and development opportunities in the mining industry. In pursuit of such opportunities, we may fail to select appropriate acquisition targets or negotiate acceptable arrangements, including arrangements to finance
acquisitions or integrate the acquired businesses and their workforce into us. Ultimately, any acquisitions would be accompanied by risks, which could include:



| | ● |  | a significant change in commodity prices after we have committed to complete the transaction and established the
purchase price or exchange ratio;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | a material ore body could prove to be below expectations;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | difficulty in integrating and assimilating the operations and workforce of any acquired companies;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | realizing anticipated synergies and maximizing the financial and strategic position of the combined enterprise;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | maintaining uniform standards, policies and controls across the organization;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | disruption of our ongoing business and its relationships with employees, suppliers, contractors and other stakeholders
as we integrate the acquired business or assets;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | the acquired business or assets may have unknown liabilities which may be significant;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | delays as a result of regulatory approvals; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------

| | ● |  | exposure to litigation (including actions commenced by shareholders) in connection with the transaction.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any material issues that we encounter in connection with an acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial position.

Reputation loss may result in decreased investor confidence, increased challenges in developing
and maintaining community relations and an impediment to our overall ability to advance our projects, thereby having a material adverse impact on our financial performance, financial condition, cash flows and growth prospects.

Damage to our reputation can be the result of the actual or perceived occurrence of any number of events, and could include any negative publicity (for
example, with respect to our handling of environmental matters or our dealings with community groups), whether true or not. The increased usage of social media and other web-based tools used to generate,
publish and discuss user-generated content and to connect with other users has made it increasingly easier for individuals and groups to communicate and share opinions and views in regards to us and our activities, whether true or not. We do not
ultimately have direct control over how we are perceived by others and reputational loss could have a



- 87 -



---

material adverse impact on our financial performance, financial condition, cash flows and growth prospects.

Our Ore/Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources are estimates only and no assurance can be given that the anticipated tonnages and grades will be
achieved, that the indicated level of recovery will be realized or that Ore/Mineral Reserves could be mined or processed profitably.

There
are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating Ore/Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, including many factors beyond our control. Such estimation is a subjective process, and the accuracy of any Ore/Mineral Reserve or Mineral Resource
estimate is a function of the quantity and quality of available data and of the assumptions made and judgments used in engineering and geological interpretation. Short-term operating factors relating to the Ore/Mineral Reserves, such as the need for
orderly development of the ore bodies or the processing of new or different ore grades, may cause the mining operation to be unprofitable in any particular accounting period. In addition, there can be no assurance that gold, silver, copper, lead or
zinc recoveries in small scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in larger scale tests under on-site conditions or during production.

Fluctuation in gold, silver, copper, zinc or lead prices, results of drilling, metallurgical testing and production and the evaluation of mine plans
subsequent to the date of any estimate may require revision of such estimate. The volume and grade of reserves mined and processed and recovery rates may not be the same as currently anticipated. Any material reductions in estimates of Ore/Mineral
Reserves and Mineral Resources, or of our ability to extract these Ore/Mineral Reserves, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Inferred Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability and have a great amount of uncertainty as to their
existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. A significant amount of exploration work must be completed in order to determine whether an Inferred Mineral Resource may be upgraded to a higher category.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment
obligations under our indebtedness.

As of December 31, 2016, we had aggregate consolidated indebtedness of $2.53 billion,
consisting of $0.5 billion aggregate principal amount of 2.125% notes due March 15, 2018, $0.55 billion aggregate principal amount of 3.625% notes due June 9, 2021, $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 3.70% notes due
March 15, 2023, $0.45 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.45% notes due June 9, 2044, and $30 million drawn on the Credit Facility. As a result of this indebtedness, we are required to use a portion of our cash flow to
service principal and interest on our debt, which will limit the cash flow available for other business opportunities. In addition, there is currently a total of $267 million drawn by PVDC under the financing arrangements for the Pueblo Viejo
Mine (Barrick (60%) and Goldcorp (40%)). In addition, we have letters of credit outstanding that support our various operations in an aggregate amount of $424 million.

Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on, or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our future performance,
which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. We may not continue to generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are
unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or eliminating dividends, selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly
dilutive. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could
result in a default on our debt obligations.

The terms of our Credit Facility require us to satisfy various affirmative and negative covenants and
to meet certain financial ratios and tests. These covenants limit, among other things, our ability to incur



- 88 -



---

further indebtedness if doing so would cause us to fail to meet certain financial covenants, create certain liens on assets or engage in certain types of transactions. We can provide no
assurances that in the future, we will not be limited in our ability to respond to changes in our business or competitive activities or be restricted in our ability to engage in mergers, acquisitions or dispositions of assets. Furthermore, a failure
to comply with these covenants, including a failure to meet the financial tests or ratios, would likely result in an event of default under our Credit Facility and would allow the lenders to accelerate the debt, which could materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment obligations under our debt, and the price of our Common Shares.

An increase in interest rates on our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are exposed to interest rate cash flow risk primarily on our outstanding debt subject to floating rates of interest, our share of the
Pueblo Viejo Mine project financing, our cash and cash equivalents, and interest-bearing receivables. We are exposed to interest rate fair value risk primarily on our debt subject to fixed rates of interest.

Additional capital or other types of financing may not be available to us if needed or, if available, the terms of such financing may not be
favourable to us.

The mining, development, expansion and exploration of our properties, will require ongoing financing as a result of
various factors including the potential for rising and unforeseen costs and fluctuations in metal prices. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain additional capital to fund our costs, especially if there is a significant decrease in
metal prices, at commercially reasonable rates or at all. A failure to obtain any necessary additional financing may result in delaying or indefinite postponement of exploration, development or production on any or all of our properties or even a
loss of property interest.

Our commodities hedging program may be unsuccessful in reducing the price risk associated with fluctuations in
base metals, diesel fuel prices or foreign currencies.

Currently, our policy is to not hedge future gold sales. We currently hedge lead,
zinc and copper to manage price exposure to fluctuations in those base metals. We also hedge our diesel fuel price exposure and foreign currencies exposures to manage adverse price movements impacting costs specific to diesel fuel prices and foreign
currencies. We can provide no assurance that a hedging program designed to reduce the price risk associated with fluctuations in base metals, diesel fuel prices or foreign currencies will be successful. Although hedging may protect us from an
adverse price change, it may also prevent us from benefiting fully from a positive price change.

The Peñasquito Mine is subject to
transportation and marketing risk that could have a negative impact on our ability to operate that Mine.

Concentrates containing
combinations of gold, silver, lead and zinc are produced in large quantities at the Peñasquito Mine and loaded onto highway road vehicles for transport to in-country smelters or to sea ports for export
to foreign smelters in markets such as Asia, Europe and North America. This type of process involves a high level of environmental and financial risk. We could be subject to potential significant increases in road and maritime transportation charges
and treatment and refining charges. Transportation of such concentrate is also subject to numerous risks including, but not limited to, delays in delivery of shipments, road blocks, terrorism, theft, weather conditions and environmental liabilities
in the event of an accident or spill. We could be subject to limited smelter availability and capacity and could also face the risk of a potential interruption of business from a third party beyond our control, which in both cases could have a
material adverse effect on our operations and revenues. We can provide no assurance that smelting, refining or transportation contracts for the Peñasquito Mines products will be entered into on acceptable terms or at all.



- 89 -



---

We may face operational risks associated with our ongoing restructuring and cost and operating
efficiency initiatives.

We are in the process of implementing initiatives relating to our strategic restructuring, including the reduction
of mining low margin ore and the implementation of cost and operating efficiency initiatives. Any future combination of these measures to increase net asset value and improve profitability will be influenced by the actual benefits and savings
achieved and by our ability to sustain these ongoing improvements. Strategic restructuring and cost cutting efforts may involve various risks, including, but not limited to, labour unrest and potential for strikes or road blockades.

We may have claims and lawsuits against it that may result in adverse outcomes.

We are, from time to time, involved in various claims, legal proceedings and complaints, including claims that purport to be class actions, arising in
the ordinary course of business. As a result of the development of the business and our structure, we may also face historical claims. We cannot reasonably predict the likelihood or outcome of any such actions. If we are unable to resolve such
disputes favourably, they may have a material adverse impact on our financial performance, cash flow and results of operations.

The failure
of information systems or a component of information systems could, depending on the nature of any such failure, adversely impact our reputation and results of operations.

Targeted attacks on our systems (or on systems of third parties that we rely on), failure or non-availability of
a key information technology (IT) system or a breach of security measures designed to protect our IT systems could result in disruptions to our operations, extensive personal injury, property damage or financial or reputational risks. We
have implemented and tested system controls and disaster recovery infrastructure for certain IT systems. As the threat landscape is ever-changing, we must make continuous mitigation efforts, including: risk prioritized controls to protect against
known and emerging threats; tools to provide automated monitoring and alerting; and backup and recovery systems to restore systems and return to normal operations.

On April 16, 2016, we were made aware that our IT systems had been attacked by an external party. While the attack did not result in any material
loss to us or interrupt our day-to-day operations, there can be no assurance that we will not experience any such losses in the future. Our risk and exposure to these
matters cannot be fully mitigated because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance protective measures or to
investigate and remediate any security vulnerabilities.

Adverse changes in legislation or in the relationship between us and our employees
and contractors may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Production at our mining
operations is dependent upon the efforts of our union and non-union employees and contractors. In addition, relations between us and our employees and contractors may be impacted by changes in the scheme of
labour relations that may be introduced by the relevant governmental authorities in whose jurisdictions we carry on business or restructuring efforts that we may undertake from time to time. Adverse changes in legislation or in the relationship
between us and our unionized employees and non-unionized employees and contractors, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Any defects in the title to the properties we own could have a material and adverse effect on our cash flow, results of operations and financial
condition.

Title insurance generally is not available for our properties, and our ability to ensure that we have obtained a secure claim to
individual mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely



- 90 -



---

constrained. We have not conducted surveys of all of the claims in which we hold direct or indirect interests and, therefore, the precise area and location of such claims may be in doubt. We can
provide no assurances that there are no title defects affecting our properties. Accordingly, our mineral properties may be subject to prior unregistered liens, agreements, transfers or claims, including indigenous land claims, and title may be
affected by, among other things, undetected defects. In addition, we may be unable to operate our properties as permitted or to enforce our rights with respect to our properties.

Market fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of our investments and the value we could realize on such investments.

Our investments in securities of other public companies are subject to volatility in the share prices of such companies. We cannot provide any assurance
that an active trading market for any of the subject shares is sustainable. The trading prices of the subject shares could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors beyond our control, including, quarterly variations in the
subject companies results of operations, changes in earnings (if any), estimates by analysts, conditions in the industry of such companies and macroeconomic developments in North America and globally, currency fluctuations and market
perceptions of the attractiveness of particular industries. The lack of a liquid market could adversely affect the value that we could ultimately realize on such investments.

Not all losses are adequately covered by insurance and such losses may cause us to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse
effect upon our financial performance and results of operations.

Our business is subject to a number of risks and hazards generally,
including adverse environmental conditions, industrial accidents, labour disputes, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, ground or slope failures, cave-ins, mechanical failures, changes in the
regulatory environment and natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, fires, floods, hurricanes and earthquakes. Such occurrences could result in damage to mineral properties or production facilities, personal injury or death,
environmental damage to our properties or the properties of others, delays in mining, monetary losses and possible legal liability.

The insurance
maintained by us to protect against risks will not cover all the potential risks associated with a mining companys operations. We may also be unable to maintain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance
coverage may not continue to be available or may not be adequate to cover any resulting liability. Moreover, insurance against risks such as loss of title to mineral property, environmental pollution, or other hazards as a result of exploration and
production is not generally available to us or to other companies in the mining industry on acceptable terms. Uninsured losses could have an adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

The market price of our securities can be volatile and expose us to the risk of litigation.

Our Common Shares are listed on the TSX and NYSE. Securities of mining companies have experienced substantial volatility in the past, often based on
factors unrelated to the financial performance or prospects of the companies involved. These factors include macroeconomic developments in North America and globally, currency fluctuations and market perceptions of the attractiveness of particular
industries. The price of our Common Shares is also likely to be significantly affected by short-term changes in gold, silver, copper, lead or zinc prices or in our financial condition or results of operations as reflected in our quarterly earnings
reports.

As a result of any of these factors, the market price of our Common Shares at any given point in time may not accurately reflect their
long-term value. Securities class action litigation often has been brought against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. We have been and may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities
litigation could result in substantial costs and damages and divert managements attention and resources.



- 91 -



---

Certain of our directors and officers also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies
involved in natural resource exploration and development and consequently there exists the possibility for these directors and officers to be in a position of conflict.

Certain of our officers and directors may have pre-existing fiduciary and contractual obligations to other
companies, including companies that are engaged in business activities similar to those intended to be conducted by us. Accordingly, they may participate in transactions and have obligations that may be in conflict or in competition with our
business or acquisition strategy. As a result of such conflict, we may be required to forego the opportunity to participate in certain transactions. Any decision made by any of these directors and officers involving Goldcorp will be made in
accordance with their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of Goldcorp and our shareholders.

DIVIDENDS

Our current policy is to pay a quarterly dividend on our Common Shares and on March 6, 2017, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per
Common Share, payable on March 24, 2017.

In 2016, the dividend paid was $0.12 per Common Share (monthly payments of $0.02 per Common Share until
March 2016, and thereafter quarterly payments of $0.02 per Common Share). In 2015, the dividend paid was $0.45 per Common Share (monthly payments of $0.05 per Common Share until July 2015, and thereafter monthly payments of $0.02 per Common Share).
In 2014, the dividend paid was $0.60 per Common Share (monthly payments of $0.05 per Common Share).

Although we expect to continue paying a cash
dividend, future dividends will be at the discretion of the Board and will subject to factors such as our cash flow, results of operations and financial condition of Goldcorp and our subsidiaries, the need for funds to finance ongoing operations,
compliance with credit agreements and other instruments, and such other considerations as the Board considers relevant.

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE

Our authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of Common Shares. As of December 31, 2016 and March 15, 2017,
853,811,565 Common Shares and 855,354,408 Common Shares were issued and outstanding, respectively. Holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive notice of any meetings of our shareholders, to attend and to cast one vote per Common Share at all
such meetings. Holders of Common Shares do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of directors and, accordingly, holders of a majority of the Common Shares entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all directors
standing for election. Holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive on a pro-rata basis such dividends, if any, as and when declared by the Board at its discretion from funds legally available therefor and
upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Goldcorp are entitled to receive on a pro-rata basis the net assets of Goldcorp after payment of debts and other liabilities, in each case subject to the
rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to any other series or class of shares ranking senior in priority to or on a pro-rata basis with the holders of Common Shares with respect to dividends
or liquidation. The Common Shares do not carry any pre-emptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights, nor do they contain any sinking or purchase fund provisions.

RATINGS

The following table sets out our corporate and debt
ratings by the rating agencies indicated as at March 15, 2017:



| |  |                   |  |  |  |                          |  |  |  |                |  | 
| |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------- |  | 
| |  | Standard & Poors |  |  |  | Moodys InvestorsService |  |  |  | Fitch Ratings  |  | 
| |  | BBB+              |  |  |  | Baa3                     |  |  |  | BBB            |  | 
| |  | negative outlook  |  |  |  | stable outlook           |  |  |  | stable outlook |  | 



- 92 -



---

Standard & Poors Ratings Services (S&P) credit ratings are on a
rating scale that ranges from AAA to D, which represents the range from highest to lowest quality. Ratings AAA to BBB- are considered investment grade, and BB+ to D are considered speculative grade. The
ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus () sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories. S&Ps rating outlook assesses the potential direction of a long-term credit rating
over the intermediate term (typically six months to two years). In determining a rating outlook, consideration is given to any changes in the economic and/or fundamental business conditions. An outlook is not necessarily a precursor of a rating
change or future CreditWatch action. Positive means that a rating may be raised; negative means that a rating may be lowered; stable means that a rating is not likely to change; developing means a rating may be raised or lowered and N.M. means not
meaningful. According to the S&P, an obligor rated BBB has adequate capacity to meet its financial commitments but is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligors in
higher-rated categories. An obligation rated BBB exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment
on the obligation.

Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) credit ratings are on a rating scale that ranges from Aaa to C,
which represents the range from highest to lowest quality. Moodys appends numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its
generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic category.According to Moodys, a rating of Baa is an
investment grade rating. Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics. A Moodys rating outlook is an opinion regarding the likely rating
direction over the medium term. Ratings outlooks fall into four categories: positive, negative, stable, and developing. A stable outlook indicates a low likelihood of a rating change over the medium term. A negative, positive or developing outlook
indicates a higher likelihood of a rating change over the medium term. The time between the assignment of a new rating outlook and a subsequent rating action has historically varied widely, depending upon the pace of new credit developments which
materially affect the issuers credit profile. On average, after the initial assignment of a positive or negative rating outlook, the next rating action  either a change in outlook, a rating review, or a change in rating  has
followed within about a year, but outlooks have also remained in place for much shorter and much longer periods of time. The next rating action subsequent to the assignment of a negative (positive) rating outlook has historically been a downgrade or
review for possible downgrade (upgrade or review for possible upgrade) about one half of the time; rating actions in the opposite direction are less common.

Fitch Ratings Ltd. (Fitch Ratings) credit ratings are on a rating scale that ranges from AAA to D, which represents the range from
highest to lowest quality. The terms investment grade and speculative grade have established themselves over time as shorthand to describe the categories AAA to BBB (investment grade) and BB to D (speculative grade). The
ratings from AA to B may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus () sign to show relative status within the major rating categories.According to Fitch Ratings system, BBB ratings indicate good credit quality and that
the expectations of default risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate, but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity. An outlook indicates the direction a
rating is likely to move over a one- to two-year period. They reflect financial or other trends that have not yet reached the level that would trigger a rating action,
but which may do so if such trends continue. Positive or negative rating outlooks do not imply that a rating change is inevitable and, similarly, ratings with stable outlooks can be raised or lowered without a prior revision to the outlook, if
circumstances warrant such an action.

We understand that the ratings are based on, among other things, information furnished by us to the above
ratings agencies and information obtained by the ratings agencies from publicly available sources. The credit ratings given to our corporate debt by the rating agencies are not recommendations to buy, hold or sell debt instruments since such ratings
do not comment as to market price or suitability for a particular investor. There is no assurance that any rating will remain in effect for any given period of time



- 93 -



---

or that any rating will not be revised or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant. Credit ratings are intended to provide investors with
(i) an independent measure of the credit quality of an issue of securities; (ii) an indication of the likelihood of repayment for an issue of securities; and (iii) an indication of the capacity and willingness of the issuer to meet
its financial obligations in accordance with the terms of those securities. Credit ratings accorded to our corporate debt may not reflect the potential impact of all risks on the value of debt instruments, including risks related to market or other
factors discussed in this annual information form. See also Risk Factors.

We have made payments to S&P, Moodys and Fitch in
connection with the confirmation of ratings assigned to our long-term debt.

MARKET FOR SECURITIES

Our Common Shares are listed and posted for trading on the NYSE under the symbol GG and on the TSX under the symbol G. The
following table sets forth information relating to the trading of the Common Shares on the TSX for the months indicated.



|               |  |           |  |  |  |          |  |  |  |             |  | 
|-------------- |  | --------- |  |  |  | -------- |  |  |  | ----------- |  | 
|Month          |  | High
(C$) |  |  |  | Low
(C$) |  |  |  | Volume      |  | 
|               |  |           |  |  |  |          |  |  |  |             |  | 
|January 2016   |  | 18.13     |  |  |  | 13.55    |  |  |  | 68,335,874  |  | 
|February 2016  |  | 22.78     |  |  |  | 15.64    |  |  |  | 116,044,816 |  | 
|March 2016     |  | 22.91     |  |  |  | 18.59    |  |  |  | 95,234,657  |  | 
|April 2016     |  | 25.29     |  |  |  | 20.26    |  |  |  | 77,822,760  |  | 
|May 2016       |  | 25.35     |  |  |  | 21.03    |  |  |  | 72,292,597  |  | 
|June 2016      |  | 24.97     |  |  |  | 21.69    |  |  |  | 83,332,025  |  | 
|July 2016      |  | 26.56     |  |  |  | 23.11    |  |  |  | 64,225,235  |  | 
|August 2016    |  | 25.17     |  |  |  | 19.89    |  |  |  | 63,265,935  |  | 
|September 2016 |  | 22.53     |  |  |  | 19.76    |  |  |  | 55,265,811  |  | 
|October 2016   |  | 21.82     |  |  |  | 18.35    |  |  |  | 62,165,324  |  | 
|November 2016  |  | 21.63     |  |  |  | 17.07    |  |  |  | 67,377,234  |  | 
|December 2016  |  | 19.21     |  |  |  | 15.95    |  |  |  | 65,192,169  |  | 

The closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX on March 15, 2017 was C$20.56.

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Directors

The following is a brief biography of each of our directors.

Ian W. Telfer  Chairman of the Board and Director. Mr. Telfer, of British Columbia, Canada, is the Chairman of the Board and a
Director of Goldcorp. Mr. Telfer has served as the Chairman of the Board since November 15, 2006 and served as Chairman of the World Gold Council from December 2009 to June 2013. Prior thereto, he was President and Chief Executive Officer
of Goldcorp since March 17, 2005 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Wheaton River Minerals Ltd. prior to such time since September 2001. Mr. Telfer became a director of Goldcorp in February 2005. Mr. Telfer has over 30 years
of experience in the precious metals business. He is co-founder and director of Renaissance Oil Corp. and has served as a director and/or officer of several Canadian and international companies.
Mr. Telfer is a Fellow in the Institute of Chartered Accountants. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Toronto, a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Ottawa and was awarded an honorary doctorate from
the University of Ottawa in 2015. Mr. Telfers extensive experience in the mining industry provides a direct benefit to both the functionality of the Board and to our



- 94 -



---

shareholders. Mr. Telfer was inducted into the Canadian Mining Hall of Fame in 2015 and is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) and Institute
of Corporate Directors (ICD).

Beverley A. Briscoe  Vice Chair of the Board and Lead Director.
Ms. Briscoe, of British Columbia, Canada, is an independent director of Goldcorp and, effective as of April 28, 2016, assumed the role of Vice-Chair and Lead Director. Ms. Briscoe became a director of Goldcorp in April 2006. In
addition to her role at Goldcorp, Ms. Briscoe is the Chair of the Board of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated. She has extensive industry experience in the transportation and industrial equipment sector. Ms. Briscoe owned a
transportation services company from 1997 to 2004 and worked in senior management positions in the heavy equipment industry as Vice President and General Manager of Wajax Industries Ltd. from 1994 to 1997 and as Vice President, Finance for the
Rivtow Group of Companies from 1989 to 1994. She also worked as Chief Financial Officer for various operating divisions in The Jim Pattison Group in Canada and Switzerland from 1983 to 1989. She is the past Chair of the Industry Training Authority
for BC (2003  2007), past Chair of the BC Forest Safety Council (2008 - 2009), past Chair of the Audit Committee for the Office of the Superintendents of Financial Institutions and a past member of the Government of Canadas Advisory
Council for Promoting Women on Boards. She is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, a Fellow of the ICD in Canada and holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of British Columbia. Ms. Briscoe brings an important
range of extensive and diverse financial, accounting and business experience to the Board. In addition, Ms. Briscoes experience managing financial and reporting matters benefits Goldcorp with respect to the issues overseen by the Audit
Committee. Ms. Briscoe is a member of the NACD and ICD.

David Garofalo Director. Mr. Garofalo,
of British Columbia, Canada, is our President and Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since February 29, 2016. Mr. Garofalo became a director of Goldcorp in April 2016. Previously, Mr. Garofalo served as President and
Chief Executive Officer and Director of Hudbay Minerals Inc. from July 2010 to December 2015. Before joining Hudbay, Mr. Garofalo served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer with Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited
(20062010), Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (19992006) and Treasurer (1998). Earlier in his career, he served as Treasurer and held various finance roles with Inmet Mining Corporation (19901998) and at Deloitte
LLP (19871990). In addition, Mr. Garofalo served as a director of Colossus Minerals Inc. (2012  2013), Malbex Resources Inc. (20092012), Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited (20082010), Stornoway Diamond Corporation
(20062010) and Tiberon Minerals Ltd. (20062007).

Peter J. Dey  Director. Mr. Dey, of Ontario, Canada, is an
independent director of Goldcorp. Mr. Dey became a director of Goldcorp in June 2006. Mr. Dey is a well-known senior corporate executive and an experienced corporate director. He is Chairman of Paradigm Capital Inc., an independent
investment dealer. He is also a director of Granite REIT Inc. and Gran Tierra Energy Inc. He is a former Chairman of the Ontario Securities Commission, former Chairman of Morgan Stanley Canada, and former Senior Partner of Osler, Hoskin &
Harcourt LLP. In 1994, he chaired the Toronto Stock Exchange Committee on Corporate Governance, and has since been involved with developing global corporate governance standards as Chairman of the Private Sector Advisory Group of the Global
Corporate Governance Forum. He holds a Masters of Laws degree from Harvard University, a Bachelor of Laws degree from Dalhousie University and a Bachelor of Science degree from Queens University. Mr. Deys intimate familiarity with
all aspects of capital markets, financial transactions and domestic and international markets provides value and informed perspective to management and the Board. His legal experience and work with the TSX and other forums also provides us with a
significant and enhanced perspective on governance issues. Mr. Dey is a member of the NACD and ICD.

Margot Franssen, O.C. 
Director. Ms. Franssen, of Ontario, Canada, is an independent director of Goldcorp. Ms. Franssen became a director of Goldcorp in April 2015. Ms. Franssen is the founder and pastpresident of The Body Shop Canada. In
2002, Ms. Franssen was appointed an Officer of the Order of Canada, and she has received the Outstanding Achievement in the Advancement of Women Award from the United Nations Development Fund UNIFEM. She received an undergraduate degree from
York University, is a fellow of Ryerson Polytechnic University, and has a honourary Doctor of Humane Letters 1995 and a honourary Doctor of Laws, Honoris Causa 1994. Ms. Franssen has served on numerous boards including CIBC, Womens
College Hospital and York University. Ms. Franssen is dedicated to



- 95 -



---

philanthropic endeavors, with a focus on the Advancement of Women and Girls and Human Rights issues. In 2016 she co-founded The Canadian Centre to End
Human Trafficking of Canadian Girls. From 2012 to 2014, she acted as Co-Chair of the National Task Force on Sex Trafficking of Canadian Girls, and for six years prior served as Board Co-Chair of Canadian Womens Foundation. In 2011, Ms. Franssen was a founding board member of Women Moving Millions, a global charitable organization committed to encouraging large-scale investments in
initiatives that advance and empower women and girls worldwide. Ms. Franssen combines pragmatic business leadership with a unique perspective on the relationship between corporations and their various stakeholders and communities. Her diverse
experience in business and philanthropy positions her to provide valuable insight to the Board. Ms. Franssen is a member of the NACD and ICD.

Clement A. Pelletier  Director. Mr. Pelletier, of British Columbia, Canada, is an independent director of Goldcorp.
Mr. Pelletier became a director of Goldcorp in May 2014. Mr. Pelletier is a process chemist/metallurgist by training with 14 years in the mining industry and 35 years in resource-related mine/environmental consulting. During his early
years, he worked with INCO in the mineral processing and extractive metallurgy area. Later, he worked with US Borax/Rio Tinto in the potash processing and underground mining area. In 1970, he joined Utah International for the development of the
Island Copper Mine on Vancouver Island, BC. Here he led the work on the implementation of an engineered system for the placement of tailing on the seafloor of Rupert Inlet. On this project, he led the first major environmental impact statement
(EIS) for a mine in British Columbia. At Island Copper he had a number of roles including Manager of Mining Services, Manager of Administration and Assistant Mine Manager and Manager of Business Development. Mr. Pelletier has
managed the environmental engineering work for a number of projects for clients including: BHP Billiton Limited, Newmont, Vale S.A./Inco Limited, Glencore Xstrata Plc (formerly known as Xstrata Plc), Placer Dome/Barrick, Teck, Rio Tinto/Borax
(formerly known as U.S. Borax Inc.) and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. He has also managed several acid rock drainage studies, industrial water treatment studies, mine closures, and qualitative risk assessments. He has managed large EIS and permitting
for major projects such as the KSM Project, the Jansen Potash Project, Goro Nickel, the Voiseys Bay Nickel Project, Escondida, the Ekati Diamond Mine and others. Since 1981 as founder and President of Rescan Group, Mr. Pelletier was
involved in the evaluation and development of Deep Sea Tailings Placement (DSTP) systems in Europe, the Americas, Africa and Southeast Asia. Mr. Pelletier has been retained as a consultant to several international mining
companies, to assist with feasibility studies, conceptual design, project development, environmental licensing, project management, due diligence and risk assessments. Mr. Pelletier holds a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry/Metallurgy from the
University of Saskatchewan and a Diploma from the Colorado School of Mines. He has served as a director of BioteQ Environmental Technologies Inc. since 2000. Mr. Pelletier is a Fellow of the CIM. Mr. Pelletiers extensive experience
in the industry and environmental and technical expertise provides valuable insight and makes him a significant resource to both the Board and management. Mr. Pelletier is a member of the NACD and ICD.

P. Randy Reifel Director. Mr. Reifel, of British Columbia, Canada, is an independent director of Goldcorp.
Mr. Reifel became a director of Goldcorp in November 2006. Mr. Reifel is President and a director of Chesapeake Gold Corp., a company that explores for precious metals in Mexico and Central America, and a Director of Gunpoint Exploration
Ltd. Prior to his appointment to the Board, he had been a director of Glamis since June 2002 following the acquisition of Francisco Gold Corp. In 1993, Mr. Reifel founded and served as President and a director of Francisco Gold Corp., which
discovered the El Sauzal gold deposit in Mexico and the Marlin gold deposit in Guatemala. Mr. Reifel holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree and a Masters of Science degree in Business Administration from the University of British Columbia.
Mr. Reifels extensive experience in the mining industry, coupled with his background in precious metals exploration and project development, combine to provide valuable industry insight and perspective to both the Board and management.
Mr. Reifel is a member of the NACDand ICD.

Charlie Sartain  Director.Mr. Sartain, of Brisbane, Australia, is
an independent director of Goldcorp. Mr. Sartain became a director of Goldcorp in January 2017. Mr. Sartain has over 30 years of experience in the mining industry as a professional mining engineer and corporate executive. Previously, he
was the Chief Executive Officer of Xstratas global copper business and under his nine-year tenure grew the business to become one of the worlds leading copper producers with mining operations and projects



- 96 -



---

spanning seven countries. Prior to that, Mr. Sartain had extensive operating and executive experience with MIM Holdings Ltd., including General Manager at Ravenswood Gold Mines and General
Manager at Ernest Henry Mine in Queensland Australia, President of Minera Alumbrera Ltd. in Argentina and Executive General Manager for Latin America. He is currently a Member of the Senate of the University of Queensland and a Director and Chairman
of the Advisory Board of the Sustainable Minerals Institute at the University of Queensland. He is also a Director of the Wesley Medical Research Institute and a Non-Executive Director on the Boards of ASX-listed Austin Engineering Ltd. and ASX-listed ALS Limited. Mr. Sartain holds a Bachelor of Engineering Degree with Honours from the University of Melbourne,
Australia. Mr. Sartain is a Fellow Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (FAusIMM), and a Fellow Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (FTSE). Mr. Sartain is a member of the NACD and ICD.

Blanca Treviño  Director. Ms. Treviño, of León, Mexico, is an independent director of Goldcorp.
Ms. Treviño became a director of Goldcorp in February 2012. Ms. Treviño is currently President and Chief Executive Officer of Softtek, S.A. de C.V. (Softek). Under her leadership, Softtek has become a
leading information technology services company in Latin America. As President, Ms. Treviño has positioned Softtek as a key part of Mexico, opening its doors to the United States as a provider of IT services. This shaped what is known
today as Nearshore, Softeks trademarked delivery model, and a term widely used in the industry to define outsourcing services provided by countries within close proximity. Throughout her 25-year career,
Ms. Treviño has gained international recognition as a promoter of the IT services industry in and from emerging countries. To help increase the participation of Latin America in the IT field, Ms. Treviño has collaborated with
various governments in the early strategies of development. Ms. Treviño has been on the Board of Directors for Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB De CV since 2006 and Grupo Lala SAB de CV since 2015. She is
also a board member of associations such as US Mexico Foundation and The Trilateral Commission and has been a board member for several universities and non-profit organizations. Originally from Monterrey,
Mexico, Ms. Treviño holds a Bachelor of Computer Science from the Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM). Ms. Treviños significant experience in the IT industry, coupled with her
experience as an entrepreneur, bring important insight to both the Board and management. Ms. Treviño is a member of the NACD and ICD.

Kenneth F. Williamson Director. Mr. Williamson, of Ontario, Canada, is an independent director of
Goldcorp. Mr. Williamson became a director of Goldcorp in November 2006. Prior thereto, he had been a director of Glamis since 1999. He was Vice-Chairman, Investment Banking at Midland Walwyn/Merrill Lynch Canada Inc. from 1993 to 1998. Prior
to that, he worked at Walwyn/Merrill in Investment Banking with increasing responsibility and titles since 1980. He has worked in the securities industry for more than 25 years, concentrating on financial services and the natural resource industries
in the United States and Europe. Mr. Williamson is currently a director of Tahoe and has been a director of a number of companies in the natural resource sector. He holds a Bachelor of Applied Science (P.Eng.) degree from the University of
Toronto and a Masters of Business Administration degree from the University of Western Ontario. Mr. Williamsons experience in the investment banking and natural resources industries, in both domestic and international markets, combined
with his knowledge of commodities and securities markets, provides the Board with valuable insight and perspective on these issues. In addition, Mr. Williamson brings valuable financial expertise and understanding to the Board.
Mr. Williamson is a member of the NACD and ICD.

Directors are elected at each annual meeting of our shareholders and serve as such until the
next annual meeting or until their successors are elected or appointed.

Committees

The members of the Audit Committee are Beverly A. Briscoe (Chair), Blanca Treviño and Kenneth Williamson.

The members of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee are Kenneth Williamson (Chair), Peter J. Dey, Margot A. Franssen, P. Randy Reifel and
Charlie Sartain.



- 97 -



---

The members of the Governance and Nominating Committee are Peter J. Dey (Chair), Clement A. Pelletier,
Blanca Treviño and Beverly A. Briscoe.

The members of the Sustainability Committee are Clement A. Pelletier (Chair), Beverly A. Briscoe,
Margot A. Franssen, P. Randy Reifel and Charlie Sartain.

Officers

The following is a brief biography of each of our officers.

David Garofalo  Director, President and Chief Executive Officer. See Directors above.

Russell Ball  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development. Mr. Ball, of British Columbia,
Canada, is our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Development, a position he has held since March 9, 2016. Mr. Ball had been our Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Capital Projects since
December 2014 and Executive Vice President, Capital Management since May 2013. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Mr. Ball served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Newmont. Over his 19 years with Newmont, Mr. Ball worked
in audit, finance, treasury and investor relations before joining the executive team as Chief Financial Officer. His tenure at Newmont took him to Indonesia, Australia, Canada, Peru, Mexico, New Zealand, Ghana and the United States. Prior to
Newmont, Mr. Ball was a manager in the finance and audit groups with PricewaterhouseCoopers in Durban, South Africa. He qualified as both a Chartered Accountant (South Africa) and a Certified Public Accountant (Colorado).

Todd White  Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. White, of Washington, United States, is our Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, a position he has held since January 1, 2017. Mr. White had been our Senior Vice President, Technical Services and Business Excellence since July 30, 2014.Prior to joining Goldcorp,
Mr. White held the position of Senior Vice President for South American operations for Newmont. Over his 21 years with Newmont, Mr. White held various leadership roles within the areas of business excellence, operations, and environment.
His prior work experience at Newmont has taken him to Indonesia, Australia, Peru, Bolivia, and the United States. Mr. White graduated from the University of Nevada with a Bachelor of Science degree in 1989.

Brent Bergeron  Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Sustainability.Mr. Bergeron, of British Columbia,
Canada, is our Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs and Sustainability, a position he has held since January 12, 2015. From September 2012 to January 2015 he served as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs and prior to that as our
Vice President, Corporate Affairs from December 2010 to September 2012. Mr. Bergeron has 20 years of international and government relations experience in many sectors such as government software, broadcasting, telecommunications and
utilities. From June 2009 until October 2010, Mr. Bergeron was employed by Harris Computer Systems Inc., the Advanced Utility Division, as Vice President of Business and Strategic Development. Prior to this position, Mr. Bergeron
held progressively senior positions at various companies in Canada and Mexico where he was responsible for government relation and business development activities in Latin America, Africa, Europe and Asia. Mr. Bergeron has a Bachelor of Arts
(Economics) and Master of Arts (Economics) degree from Carleton University.

Charlene Ripley  Executive Vice President, General
Counsel. Ms. Ripley, of British Columbia, Canada, is our Executive Vice President, General Counsel, a position she has held since April 1, 2013. Ms. Ripley leads our Legal, Ethics and Compliance and People teams, as well as
risk functions including Internal Audit, Enterprise Risk Management and Insurance. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Ms. Ripley served as SVP & General Counsel at Linn Energy in Houston. Ms. Ripley holds a Bachelor of Arts, with
distinction, from the University of Alberta and earned her law degree from Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia. She is a member of The Law Society of British Columbia, The Law Society of Alberta and the Texas State Bar.

Jason Attew, Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategy. Mr. Attew, of British Columbia, is our Senior Vice President,
Corporate Development and Strategy, a position he has held since August 15, 2016. Mr. Attew is a mining and metals banking executive with over 20 years of experience encompassing project management, corporate finance and investment
banking. Mr. Attew has advised on over $20 billion of corporate transactions, raised over $17 billion in growth capital via equity and debt capital markets, and led $6 billion in equity/equity linked financings. Mr. Attew
began his career as a Project Manager for a geological exploration company before embarking on a finance career in 2001. Most recently, he was a Managing Director of BMOs Global Metals & Mining team, widely regarded as the leading
mining investment bank. Mr. Attew holds a Bachelor of Science from the University of British Columbia, as well as a Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Queens University in Ontario.



- 98 -



---

Wade Bristol  Senior Vice President, Canada and US Operations.Mr. Bristol, of
Nevada, United States, is our Senior Vice President, Canada and US Operations, a position he has held since May 13, 2016. Mr. Bristol had served as our Vice President, Mine Improvement and Support since July 30, 2014. Prior to joining
Goldcorp, Mr. Bristol served in various General Manager capacities for Newmont North America including GM-Nevada Underground, GM-Carlin Operations and GM-Nevada Mine Improvement. Prior to this, Mr. Bristol also served in various senior operations positions for multiple mining entities throughout the western United States. Mr. Bristol has a Bachelor of
Science in Mining Engineering degree from Montana Tech of the University of Montana.

Joseph Dick  Senior Vice President, Latin America.Mr. Dick, of Mexico City, Mexico, is our Senior Vice President, Latin America, a position he has held since March 6, 2015. From June 2014 to March 2015, he served as the Chief Operating Officer for Goldcorp
Mexico. Mr. Dick has over 32 years of experience in the mineral sector, including operations, maintenance, engineering, supply chain and sustainability roles in both surface and underground environments. Prior to joining Goldcorp, he
led the transition of the Pueblo Viejo Mine, from construction through to full production, as Pueblo Viejo General Manager from April 2011 to June 2014. Also in his 10 years with Barrick, he led the
start-up of the Cortez Hills open pit and underground mines as General Manager of the combined Cortez Mines from January 2008 to March 2011; he served on the leadership team of Barrick GoldStrike as Manager of
the Underground Mines from January 2006 to January 2008. Mr. Dick has also served in numerous other leadership, managerial and support roles over his career. Mr. Dick received a Bachelor of Science in Mining Engineering from
Montana Tech of the University of Montana in 1983.

Paul Harbidge  Senior Vice President, Exploration.Mr. Harbidge, of
British Columbia, Canada, is our Senior Vice President, Exploration, a position he has held since August 1, 2016. Mr. Harbidge brings over 20 years of mining experience to us, most recently as head of exploration at Randgold Resources.
Mr. Harbidge is responsible for the development, implementation and management of the global exploration function, within our decentralized model. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Geology from Kingston University in the UK, as well as a Master
of Science in Mineral Exploration and Mining Geology from Leicester University in the UK.

Richard J. Orazietti  Senior Vice President,
Controller. Mr. Orazietti, of British Columbia, Canada, is our Senior Vice President, Controller, a position he has held since March 9, 2016. Mr. Orazietti, had been our Vice President, Internal Audit since February 2012
after joining us in January 2012. Prior to joining us, Mr. Orazietti was Vice President of Finance at BCE Inc., Canadas largest communications company where he led the financial management of various operating divisions including most
recently, its residential services business. Prior to joining BCE Inc. in December 2004, he was Director, Operational Finance at 360networks Corp, a North American telecommunications provider, where he held several increasingly senior roles in
Finance and was a key member of the management team involved in the sale of the 360networks Canadian operations to BCE Inc. He brings us extensive experience in financial and operational management, strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions and
restructuring. Mr. Orazietti is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CA) in British Columbia and holds a Bachelor of Business Administration from Simon Fraser University.

Mark A. Ruus  Senior Vice President, Tax. Mr. Ruus, of British Columbia, Canada, is our Senior Vice President, Tax, a position
he has held since July 8, 2010. Mr. Ruus had served as our Vice President, Tax since November 15, 2006, after joining us in July 2006. He is responsible for global tax planning, tax-related
support of corporate development and finance activities and tax compliance. Prior to joining us, Mr. Ruus was Vice President, Taxation for Placer Dome where he played leading tax roles for ten years. Prior to this he spent 14 years with Price
Waterhouse (pre-merger with Coopers & Lybrand) servicing primarily international resource companies. Mr. Ruus is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CA) and holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree
from the University of Calgary.

Rohan Athaide  Vice President, Internal Audit. Mr. Athaide, of British Columbia, Canada,
is our Vice President, Internal Audit, a position he has held since March 9, 2016. Mr. Athaide joined us on January 30, 2012 and over the past 4 years, has held increasingly senior leadership responsibilities. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Athaide held leadership roles in the Advisory Services practice of Ernst & Young, during



- 99 -



---

which he led internal audit and internal controls over financial reporting services for several multi-national corporations, while also providing consulting services in risk management, process
improvement, and change management. Mr. Athaide has certifications in internal audit and risk management, and holds an Honours Bachelor of Arts degree specializing in economics from the University of Toronto.

Luis Canepari  Vice President, Information Technology.Mr. Canepari, of British Columbia, Canada, is our Vice President,
Information Technology, a position he has held since February 15, 2013. Mr. Canepari had served as our Director, Information Technology Applications since November 2012. As Vice President, Information Technology, Mr. Canepari leads
the global information technology organization and is responsible for driving and overseeing enterprise-wide plans to further realize value from our strategic business and technology investments, particularly leveraging SAP as our strategic
platform. Before joining Goldcorp, Mr. Canepari held the position of Director of Engineering and Construction in AES Corporation based in Arlington, Virginia. Prior to that, Mr. Canepari held several information technology leadership
positions at AES Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation. Mr. Canepari holds an MBA degree from Georgetown University, Washington, DC and a Bachelor in Science degree with a major in Systems Engineering from Universidad Metrolopolitana,
Caracas, Venezuela. He is also a Certified Information Security Manager and a Certified Information Security Auditor.

Randall Chatwin 
Vice President, Assistant General Counsel.Mr. Chatwin, of British Columbia, Canada, is our Vice President, Assistant General Counsel, a position he has held since February 15, 2017. Mr. Chatwin had been our Assistant General
Counsel since May 2015. Prior to joining Goldcorp, he spent eleven years in private practice at the law firm of Lawson Lundell LLP practicing corporate commercial law with a specific focus on the mining industry. Mr. Chatwin has a Bachelor of
Arts from the University of Victoria and Juris Doctor from the University of Saskatchewan.

Chris Cormier  Vice President,
Reclamation& Closure.Mr. Cormier, of British Columbia, Canada, is our Vice President, Reclamation & Closure, a position he has held since February 15, 2017. Mr. Cormier had been
our General Manager, Reclamation since October 31, 2014. Prior to moving into a corporate role at Goldcorp, he spent three years as Mine General Manager at Red Lake preceded by five years as Mine General Manager at the Porcupine Operations.
Mr. Cormier has a Bachelor of Science in Mining Engineering from Michigan Technological University and is a registered Professional Engineer in the Province of British Columbia.

Rishi Ghuldu  Vice President, Operational Excellence.Mr. Ghuldu, of Ontario Canada, is our Vice President, Operational
Excellence, a position he has held since February 17, 2016, taking on responsibility for our Operational Excellence and Supply Chain functions. Mr. Ghuldu had been our Director, Operational Excellence since July 2013. Prior to joining
Goldcorp, he spent nine years at Barrick Gold, taking on a series of progressive positions and responsibilities, which included Business Improvement, Supply Chain and Mergers and Acquisitions. Mr. Ghuldu has a proven track record in
implementing systems that generate operational improvements and yield significant business results. He began his career in the automotive industry, involved with operations management. Mr. Ghuldu has a Bachelor of Technology in Manufacturing
Engineering from McMaster University and an executive MBA from the Kellogg-Schulich School of Business, at Northwestern and York University.

Kim Hackney  Vice President, Project Execution.Mr. Hackney, of Virginia, United States, is our Vice President, Project
Execution, a position he has held since February 18, 2015. Mr. Hackney had served as our Regional Project Director for Mexico since August 2014. Mr. Hackney is an Engineer with more than 30 experience in mining and commercial
development projects. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Mr. Hackney worked in the Project Development and Delivery Department of Newmont. Mr. Hackney held a number of leadership positions, culminating in the role leading a regional
portfolio of projects as the Regional Project Director of Africa from September 2011 to July 2014. Mr. Hackney was Project Director III responsible for the development and delivery of mega projects for Newmont from July 2009 to September 2011.
Mr. Hackney was Engineering Manager for Newmont in Peru from February 2001 to May 2004.



- 100 -



---

Simon Hille  Vice President, Technical Services.Mr. Hille, of British
Columbia, Canada, is our Vice President, Technical Services, a position he has held since January 1, 2014. Mr. Hill had been our Director, Metallurgy since 2012. Mr. Hille is an Extractive Metallurgist with extensive experience in
senior technical positions in the mining industry, with a proven track record in developing new technologies. He has held a series of progressively senior positions in both production and corporate levels at various major mining companies, including
Barrick, Newcrest Mining, Western Mining Corporation and Placer Dome. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Mr. Hille spent five years as the Senior Manager Metallurgy and Process for Barrick in Toronto. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Extractive
Metallurgy from the Western Australian School of Mines.

Joanne Klein  Vice President, People.Ms. Klein, of British
Columbia, Canada, is our Vice President, People, a position she has held since January 1, 2014. Ms. Klein had been our Director, Compensation since May 2011. Ms. Klein has over 16 years of experience in Human Resource specializing in
compensation. She has held a series of progressively senior positions at various global organizations in Canada, the US and Europe. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Ms. Klein held the position of Director, Compensation Strategy and Design at TELUS
from April 2008 to February 2011 and Vice President, Reward at Deutsche Bank AG from June 2003 to March 2008 in both London, England and New York, USA. Ms. Klein started her career with Deloitte in their International Assignments Tax practice
in London, England where she successfully achieved her Association of Tax Technicians qualification. Ms. Klein also holds a Bachelor of Arts in Accountancy (Honours) from Glasgow Caledonian University.

Gil Lawson  Vice President, Geology and Mine Planning.Mr. Lawson, of British Columbia, Canada, is our Vice President,
Geology and Mine Planning, a position her has held since July 30, 2014. Mr. Lawson had been our Vice President, Operations Support, U.S. & Canada since July 2013, and served as Mine General Manager of Musselwhite Mine since June 2008.
Mr. Lawson is a Professional Engineer registered in British Columbia and Ontario with 29 years of experience in the mining industry. Other senior positions held by Mr. Lawson include General Manager with DeBeers Canada Ltd. and Chief
Engineer, Mining Manager and Project Manager with Placer Dome Inc. Mr. Lawson has a Bachelor of Engineering (Mining) degree from McGill University.

Ann Masse, Ph.D.  Vice President, Health and Safety.Dr. Masse, of British Columbia, Canada, is our Vice President, Health and
Safety, a position she has held since August 11, 2014. Prior to joining Goldcorp, Dr. Masse worked at DuPont, where over the last 23 years she held progressively responsible positions in the organization, most recently Global Safety,
Health and Environment Leader  Business and Strategy and Executive Advisor to the Senior Vice President Operations. Prior to these roles, Dr. Masse was Safety, Health and Environmental Leader for the DuPont Chemicals Business. DuPont is
recognized as the worldwide leader in safety and health practices and performance. Dr. Masse holds a Ph.D. in Physical Oceanography from the University of Delaware and completed her post-doctoral appointment with the Canada Centre for Inland
Waters in Burlington, Ontario. Dr. Masse holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Environmental Studies from St. Michaels College (Vermont).

Bill Patterson  Vice President, Global Studies. Mr. Patterson, of Colorado, United States, is our Vice President, Global
Studies, a position he has held since February 17, 2016. Mr. Patterson had been our Mexico Regional Study Director since 2014. Prior to joining us, he held positions in business planning, studies and project development for Newmont.
Mr. Patterson is a Civil Engineer with global mining exposure in all phases of the mine life cycle including business planning, early stage studies, project engineering, permitting, construction,
start-up, operations, and closure. Mr. Patterson has a strong cross-functional technical background with specific expertise in managing geographically-dispersed, cross-functional teams for the development
of mega projects. He has held a series of progressively senior positions in corporate functions, studies, project execution and operations. He is a registered Professional Engineer and holds a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and a Masters
of Business Administration.

Raman Randhawa  Vice President, Business Planning.Mr. Randhawa, of British Columbia, Canada, is
our Vice President, Business Performance and Reporting, a position he has held since August 1, 2015. Mr. Randhawa had been our Vice President, Operations Finance since November 29, 2012. Mr.



- 101 -



---

Randhawa is a Chartered Accountant with approximately fifteen years experience in the mining industry. He has held a series of senior financial leadership roles at Goldcorp, including
Assistant Controller, Assistant Treasurer, Director of Financial Planning, Director of Global Supply Chain and Director of Finance, Canada & USA. Prior to joining us in 2005, Mr. Randhawa worked at the international accounting firm of
Ernst & Young. Mr. Randhawa has a Bachelor of Business Administration (Finance and Accounting) from Simon Fraser University.

David Stephens  Vice President, Treasurer. Mr. Stephens, of Alberta, Canada, is our Vice President, Treasurer, a
position he has held since March 9, 2016. Mr. Stephens had served as our Director, Business Development from February 2015 to March 2016 and as our Manager, Business Development from January 2014 to February 2015. Prior to joining
Goldcorp, from September 2011 to December 2013, Mr. Stephens operated a private consulting firm that prepared research reports valuing equities in the mining sector for a major investment bank. Prior to that, Mr. Stephens held several
increasingly senior roles in the mining investment banking group at Macquarie Capital Markets Canada, culminating with the position of Vice President. Mr. Stephens holds a bachelors degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
from Harvard University.

Anna M. Tudela, Acc. Dir.  Vice President, Diversity, Regulatory Affairs and Corporate Secretary.
Ms. Tudela, of British Columbia, Canada, is our Vice President, Diversity, Regulatory Affairs and Corporate Secretary, a position she has held since in May 2015. Ms. Tudela had been our Vice President, Regulatory Affairs since May 20,
2008. Prior thereto, she had been our Director, Regulatory Compliance from August 2007 to May 2008, was appointed our Corporate Secretary on May 2, 2007 and had been our Director, Legal and Assistant Corporate Secretary from August 15,
2005 to May 2, 2007. Ms. Tudela has more than 30 years of experience in the securities and corporate finance areas. She is a member of the Governance Professionals of Canada, the ICD, the NACD,the British Columbia and Yukon Chamber
of Mines, Forum for Women Entrepreneurs BC, the Rocky Mountain Mineral Foundation and a member of Women on Board. Prior to joining us, Ms. Tudela worked in the Securities and Corporate Finance Department of Davis LLP. Ms. Tudela was
Corporate Secretary of Diamond Fields Resources Inc. from 1995 to 1996 and Director, Legal and Assistant Corporate Secretary of Silver Wheaton from July 2005 to October 2007.

Lisa Wade, M.Sc.  Vice President, Environment. Ms. Wade, of Washington, United States, is the Vice President, Environment, a
position she has held since August 1, 2015. Ms. Wade had been Director, Environment since 2010. Ms. Wade began her career 21 years ago in 1996 working for Newmont, at the Twin Creeks Mine in Nevada and held progressively more senior
positions in the US. Ms. Wade moved to Latin America where she lived and worked for nine years in the mining industry in the areas of Environmental and Community Relations. Ms. Wade earned both her Bachelor of Science degree and Masters of
Science degree in Environmental Engineering from Montana Tech in Butte, Montana.

As at the date of this annual information form, our directors and
executive officers, as a group, beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or exercised control or direction over 4,840,972 Common Shares, representingless than onepercent of the total number of Common Shares outstanding before
giving effect to the exercise of options or warrants to purchase Common Shares held by such directors and executive officers. The statement as to the number of Common Shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or over which control or
direction is exercised by our directors and executive officers as a group is based upon information furnished by the directors and executive officers.



- 102 -



---

Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties and Sanctions

None of our directors or executive officers is, or within ten years prior to the date hereof has been, a director, chief executive officer or chief
financial officer of any company (including Goldcorp) that: (i) was subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, that
was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, that was issued while the director or executive officer was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer; or (ii) was subject to a cease
trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, that was issued after the
director or executive officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief
financial officer.

None of our directors, executive officers, or shareholders holding a sufficient number of our securities to affect materially
control of Goldcorp: (i) is, or within ten years prior to the date hereof has been, a director or executive officer of any company (including Goldcorp) that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing
to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or
trustee appointed to hold its assets, other than Peter J. Dey, who ceased to be a director of the Chicago Sun Times in 2008, prior to the Chicago Sun Times filing for Chapter 11 Reorganization on March 31, 2009, and Russell Ball, who was a
director of Molycorp, Inc. until August 31, 2016, which filed for Chapter 11 Reorganization on June 25, 2015; or (ii) has, within ten years prior to the date hereof, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to
bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the director, executive officer or shareholder.

None of our directors, executive officers, or shareholders holding a sufficient number of our securities to affect materially the control of
Goldcorp, has been subject to: (i) any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority; or
(ii) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision, other than Ian W. Telfer, who entered into a settlement agreement
with staff of the Ontario Securities Commission in September 2013 with respect to allegations that he acted contrary to the public interest in connection with a private share transaction in 2008. Mr. Telfer cooperated fully with staff and,
pursuant to the settlement agreement, was reprimanded, gave certain undertakings and paid $200,000 towards the costs of the staffs investigation.

Conflicts of Interest

To the best of our knowledge, and
other than as disclosed in this annual information form, there are no known existing or potential conflicts of interest between us and any of our directors or officers, except that certain of the directors and officers serve as directors and
officers of other public companies, including Tahoe, and therefore it is possible that a conflict may arise between their duties as a director or officer of Goldcorp and their duties as a director or officer of such other companies. See Risk
Factors  Certain of our directors and officers also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in natural resource exploration and development and consequently there exists the possibility for these directors and officers
to be in a position of conflict above.

INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

Other than as described in this annual information form, since January 1, 2015, none of our directors, executive officers or 10% shareholders or
any associate or affiliate of any such person or company, has or had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction that has materially affected or will materially affect us or any of our subsidiaries.



- 103 -



---

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

The transfer agent and registrar for our Common Shares in Canada isCST Trust Company at its principal offices in Vancouver, British Columbia and
Toronto, Ontario. The co-transfer agent and registrar for our Common Shares in the United States is Mellon Investor Services LLC at its principal offices in Jersey City, New Jersey.

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

Other than contracts entered into in the
ordinary course of business, we have not entered into any material contracts within the financial year ended December 31, 2016 or before such time that are still in effect.

INTERESTS OF EXPERTS

Stephane Blais, P.Eng., Chris Osiowy,
P.Geo., and Nuri Hmidi, P.Eng., have acted as qualified persons in connection with the Red Lake Report and have reviewed and approved the information related to the Red Lake Mine contained in this annual information form, other than Mineral Resource
and Mineral Reserve estimations. Brad Armstrong, P.Eng, has reviewed and approved the Mineral Reserve estimation and Ian Russell, P.Geo., has reviewed and approved the Mineral Resource estimation with respect to the Red Lake Mine contained in this
annual information form. Each of the aforementioned persons is an employee of Goldcorp.

Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Denis Fleury, P.Eng., Andy
Fortin, P.Eng., and Luc Joncas, P.Eng., have acted as qualified persons in connection with the Éléonore Report and have reviewed and approved the information related to the Éléonore Mine contained in this annual
information form. Each of the aforementioned persons is an employee of Goldcorp.

Dan Redmond, P.Geo., Dr. Sally Goodman, P.Geo.,
Dr. Guillermo Pareja, P.Geo., and Andre De Ruijter, P.Eng., have acted as qualified persons in connection with the Peñasquito Report and have reviewed and approved the information related to the Peñasquito Mine contained in this
annual information form. Each of the aforementioned persons is an employee of Goldcorp.

Luke Evans, M.Sc., P.Eng., Hugo Miranda, MBA, P.C. and
Kathleen Ann Altman, Ph.D., P.E. of Roscoe Postle Associates Inc., have acted as qualified persons in connection with the Pueblo Viejo Report and have reviewed and approved the information related to the Pueblo Viejo Mine contained in this annual
information form.

Andrew Tripp, P.E., Dr. Sally Goodman, P.Geo., Dr. Guillermo Parea, P.Geo., and Kevin Murray, P.Eng., have acted as
qualified persons in connection with the Cerro Negro Report and have reviewed and approved the information related to the Cerro Negro Mine contained in this annual information form. Each of the aforementioned persons is an employee of Goldcorp.

All other scientific and technical information in this annual information form has been reviewed and approved byGil Lawson, P.Eng., Vice
President, Geology and Mine Planning at Goldcorp, who is a qualified person under NI 43-101.

As at the date
hereof, Stephane Blais, P.Eng., Chris Osiowy, P.Geo., and Nuri Hmidi, P.Eng., Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., Denis Fleury, P.Eng., Andy Fortin, P.Eng., Luc Joncas, P.Eng., Dan Redmond, P.Geo., Dr. Sally Goodman, P.Geo., Dr. Guillermo
Pareja, P.Geo., Andre De Ruijter, P.Eng., Andrew Tripp, P.E., Kevin Murray, P.Eng., Luke Evans, M.Sc., P.Eng., Hugo Miranda, MBA, P.C., Kathleen Ann Altman, Ph.D., P.E., Brad Armstrong, P.Eng. and Ian Russell, P.Geo. collectively hold less than one
percent of our outstanding securities or of any our associates or affiliates.

Deloitte LLP (Deloitte) is our chartered
professional accountant and is independent within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Chartered Professional Accountants of British Columbia and the rules and standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the
securities laws and regulations administered by the SEC.



- 104 -



---

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring our systems and procedures for financial reporting and internal control, reviewing certain public
disclosure documents and monitoring the performance and independence of our external auditors. The Audit Committee is also responsible for reviewing our annual audited consolidated financial statements, unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements and managements discussion and analysis of financial results of operations for both annual and interim consolidated financial statements and review of related operations prior to their approval by the full Board.

The Audit Committees charter sets out its responsibilities and duties, qualifications for membership, procedures for committee member removal and
appointments and reporting to the Board. A copy of the charter is attached as Schedule A.

The members of our Audit Committee as at
the date of this annual information form are Beverley A. Briscoe (Chair), Blanca Treviño and Kenneth F. Williamson. Each of Ms. Briscoe and Treviño and Mr. Williamson are independent and financially literate within the
meaning of National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees (NI 52-110). In addition to being independent directors as described above, all members
of the Audit Committee must meet an additional independence test under NI 52-110 in that their directors fees are the only compensation they, or their firms, receive from us and that they are
not affiliated with Goldcorp. The meaning of independence under NI 52-110 is set out in Schedule A to the Audit Committees charter.

The Audit Committee met five times in 2016. Each of Beverley A. Briscoe (Chair), Blanca Treviño and Kenneth F. Williamson were present at all
five meetings.

Relevant Education and Experience

Set
out below is a description of the education and experience of each audit committee member that is relevant to the performance of his or her responsibilities as an audit committee member:

Beverley A. Briscoe  Director. Ms. Briscoe has been President of Briscoe Management Limited since 2004 and is
Chair of the Board of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated. She is the past Chair of the Audit Committee for the Office of the Superintendents of Financial Institutions. She is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, a Fellow of the
ICD in Canada and holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of British Columbia. Ms. Briscoe brings an important range of extensive and diverse financial, accounting and business experience to the Board. In addition,
Ms. Briscoes experience managing financial and reporting matters benefits Goldcorp with respect to the issues overseen by the Audit Committee. In 2016, Ms. Briscoe was named to the 2016 National Association of Corporate
Directors (NACD) Directorship 100. Ms. Briscoe is a member of the NACD and the ICD.

Blanca Treviño 
Director. Ms. Treviño is currently President and Chief Executive Officer of Softtek. Under her leadership, Softtek has become a leading information technology services company in Latin America. Ms. Treviño has been on
the Board of Directors for Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB De CV since 2006 and Grupo Lala SAB de CV since 2015. She is also a board member of associations such as US Mexico Foundation and The Trilateral Commission and
has been a board member for several universities and non-profit organizations. Ms. Treviño has also been a frequent presenter in national and international forums related to entrepreneurialism,
information technology and the role of women in business. She has participated in forums at the World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, Kellogg School of Management, Harvard Business School and London Business School. Originally from Monterrey,
Mexico, Ms. Treviño holds a Bachelor of Computer Science from the Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM). Ms. Treviños significant experience in the IT industry, coupled with her
experience as an entrepreneur, bring important insight to both the Board and management. Ms. Treviño is a member of the NACD and ICD.



- 105 -



---

Kenneth F. Williamson Director.
Mr. Williamson was Vice-Chairman, Investment Banking at Midland Walwyn/Merrill Lynch Canada Inc. from 1993 to 1998. Prior to that, he worked at Walwyn/Merrill in Investment Banking with increasing responsibility and titles since 1980. He has
worked in the securities industry for more than 25 years, concentrating on financial services and the natural resource industries in the United States and Europe. He holds a Bachelor of Applied Science (P.Eng.) degree from the University of Toronto
and a Masters of Business Administration degree from the University of Western Ontario. Mr. Williamsons experience in the investment banking and natural resources industries, in both domestic and international markets, combined with his
knowledge of commodities and securities markets, provides the Board with valuable insight and perspective on these issues. In addition, Mr. Williamson brings valuable financial expertise and understanding to the Board. Mr. Williamson is a
member of the NACD and ICD.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committees charter sets out responsibilities regarding the provision of non-audit services by
our independent registered chartered accountant. This policy encourages consideration of whether the provision of services other than audit services is compatible with maintaining the auditors independence and requires Audit Committee pre-approval of permitted audit and audit-related services.

External Auditor Service Fees

Deloitte has served as our chartered professional accountant for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Fees paid to Deloitte
in 2016 and 2015 are set out below:



|                      |  |                          |        |  |      |  |        |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ------ |  | ---- |  | ------ |  |  | 
|                      |  |                          |        |  |      |  |        |  |  | 
|                      |  | 2016                     |        |  | 2015 |  |       
|                      |  | (amount in C$ thousands) |        | 
|Audit Fees(1)         |  |                          | $5,879 |  |      |  | $6,989 |  | 
|Audit-related Fees(2) |  |                          | 278    |  |      |  | 28     |  | 
|Tax Fees(3)           |  |                          | 405    |  |      |  | 362    |  | 
|All Other Fees(4)     |  |                          | -      |  |      |  | 325    |  | 
|                      |  |                          |        |  |      |  |        |  | 
|Total                 |  |                          | $6,562 |  |      |  | $7,704 |  | 
|                      |  |                          |        |  |      |  |        |  | 
|                      |  |                          |        |  |      |  |        |  |  | 



| | (1) | Audit fees include fees for services rendered by the external auditors in relation to the audit and review of our
financial statements and in connection with our statutory and regulatory filings. The decrease in audit fees in 2016 compared to 2015 is primarily related to the reduction of audit fees due to there not being any impairments in 2016 and the timing
of statutory audit billings.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | In 2016, audit-related fees primarily related to assistance with securities filings ($195,000), the audit of compliance
with the Cree Payment Statement ($40,000) and the audit of our defined benefit plan ($37,000). In 2015, audit-related fees primarily related to services in connection with assistance with securities filings ($25,000) and the Spanish translation of
the annual report ($3,000).
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (3) | Tax fees mainly related to of tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for various jurisdictions.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (4) | In 2015, other fees related to information technology leadership, electronic data hosting and mine safety.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 106 -



---

Auditor Partner Rotation

As a registrant with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, the signing Deloitte audit partner and the engagement quality control partner
cannot serve in those roles on our audit team for more than five consecutive years. Deloitte audit partners of our subsidiaries whose assets or revenues constitute 20% or more of the assets or revenues of our respective consolidated assets or
revenues cannot serve in this role for more than seven consecutive years.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information relating to Goldcorp can be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com; on the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
website at www.sec.gov; or on our website at www.goldcorp.com. Additional information, including directors and officers remuneration and indebtedness, principal holders of our securities and securities authorized for
issuance under equity compensation plans is contained in our management information circular dated March 13, 2017 for our annual and special meeting to be held on April 26, 2017, which will be available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
Additional financial information is provided in our audited consolidated financial statements and managements discussion and analysis for the financial year ended December 31, 2016.



- 107 -



---

SCHEDULE A

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE AUDIT COMMITTEE



|I. | PURPOSE
|-- | -------

The Audit Committee (Audit Committee or Committee) is a committee of the Board of Directors (the
Board) of Goldcorp Inc. (Goldcorp or the Company). The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities in relation to internal control and financial reporting, and carries
out certain oversight functions on behalf of the Board, including the oversight of:



| | A. | the accuracy, integrity and timeliness of the Companys financial statements and other financial information
provided by the Company to securities regulators, governmental bodies and/or the public.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B. | the Companys compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| | C. | assessing the independence, qualifications, performance and recommending the appointment of the Companys
independent auditor to the Companys Board of directors;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | D. | overseeing the non-audit services provided by the independent auditor.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| | E. | assessing the performance of the Companys internal audit function.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| | F. | assessing the standards of business conduct and ethics for directors, senior management and employees.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | G. | assessing managements evaluation of the effectiveness of internal controls.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | H. | assessing the Companys enterprise risk management framework.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------



|II. | COMPOSITION AND OPERATIONS
|--- | --------------------------



| | A. | The Committee shall operate under the guidelines applicable to all Board committees, which are located in
item 31(vii) of Tab A-8, Board Guidelines.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B. | The Audit Committee shall be comprised of at least three directors, all of whom are required to be
independent as such term is defined in Appendix A of the Board Guidelines.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | C. | In addition, unless otherwise authorized by the Board, no director shall be qualified to be a member of the Audit
Committee if such director (i) is an affiliated person, as defined in Appendix One, or (ii) receives (or his/her immediate family member or the entity for which such director is a director, member, partner or principal and
which provides consulting, legal, investment banking, financial or other similar services to the Company receives), directly or
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





page A-1



---

| | indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensation from the Company other than compensation for serving in his or her capacity as member of the Board and as a member of Board committees.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | D. | All members shall, to the satisfaction of the Board of Directors, be financially literate as defined in
Appendix One, and at least one member shall have accounting or related financial management expertise to qualify as a financial expert as defined in Appendix One.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | E. | If a Committee member simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies, the Committee
shall seek the Boards determination as to whether such simultaneous service would impair the ability of such member to effectively serve on the Companys audit committee and ensure that such determination is disclosed.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | F. | The Committee shall meet at least four times annually, or more frequently as circumstances require. The Committee shall
meet within 45 days following the end of each of the first three financial quarters to review and discuss the unaudited financial results for the preceding quarter and the related MD&A and shall meet within 90 days following the end of
the fiscal year end to review and discuss the audited financial results for the year and related MD&A prior to their publishing.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | G. | The Committee may ask members of management or others to attend meetings and provide pertinent information as necessary.
For purposes of performing their audit related duties, members of the Committee shall have full access to all corporate information and shall be permitted to discuss such information and any other matters relating to the financial position of the
Company with senior employees, officers and independent auditors of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | H. | As part of its job to promote and foster open communication, the Committee should meet at least annually with
management, the internal auditor and the independent auditor in separate executive sessions to discuss any matters that the Committee or each of these groups believe should be discussed privately. In addition, the Committee or at least its Chair
should meet with the independent auditor and management quarterly to review the Companys financial statements.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | I. | Each of the Chair of the Committee, members of the Committee, Chair of the Board, independent auditors, Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Corporate Secretary shall be entitled to request that the Chair of the Audit Committee call a meeting which shall be held within 48 hours of receipt of such request.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|III. | RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES
|---- | ---------------------------

To fulfill its responsibilities and duties the Audit Committee shall:



| | A. | Approve an agenda for the upcoming year.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------





page A-2



---

| | B. | Review and update these Terms of Reference at least annually, or as conditions dictate.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | C. | Describe in the Companys Management Information Circular the Committees composition and responsibilities and
how they were discharged.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | D. | Review Significant and Material Financial Documents and support related thereto to be released by the Company and other
documents as outlined herein:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | i) | Review with management, the independent auditors, and the internal auditor, the Companys interim and annual
financial statements, management discussion and analysis, earnings releases and any reports or other financial information to be submitted to any governmental and/or regulatory body, or the public, including any certification, report, opinion, or
review rendered by the independent auditor for the purpose of recommending their approval to the Board prior to their filing, issue or publication. The Chair of the Committee may represent the entire Committee for purposes of this review in
circumstances where time does not allow the full Committee to be available.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii) | Review analyses prepared by management, and/or the internal auditor, and/or the independent auditor setting forth
significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of the effects of alternative GAAP and IFRS methods on the financial statements.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iii) | Review the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off balance sheet structures, on the financial
statements of the Company.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iv) | Ensure that adequate procedures are in place for the review of the Companys public disclosure of financial
information extracted or derived from the issuers financial statements, as well as review any financial information, non-GAAP metrics contained in the MDA and basis of presentation and earnings guidance provided to analysts and periodically
assess the adequacy of those procedures.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | v) | Review policies and procedures with respect to directors and officers expense accounts and management
perquisites and benefits, including their use of corporate assets and expenditures related to executive travel and entertainment, and review the results of the procedures performed in these areas by the independent auditor and/or the internal
auditor.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | vi) | Review expenses of the Non-Executive Board Chair and of the CEO annually.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | vii) | Review the Companys aircraft flight record annually.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------





page A-3



---

| | E. | Interaction with the Independent Auditor (the Auditor) will be as follows:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | i) | The Auditor will report directly to the Audit Committee as representatives of the shareholders. They are to be available
to the Audit Committee and the full Board as needed.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii) | In consultation with the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, recommend to the Board and approve the
selection of the Auditor, and consider the Auditors independence and effectiveness, and approve the Auditors fees and other compensation.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iii) | Continuously monitor the relationship between management and the Auditor including reviewing any management letters or
other reports issued and discussing any material differences of opinion between management and the auditor.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iv) | Review and discuss, on an annual basis, with the Auditor all significant relationships they have with the Company to
determine their independence and report to the Board of Directors.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | v) | Review and approve requests for any non-audit services to be performed by the Auditor. Pre-approval of non-audit
services is satisfied if:
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | a) | the aggregate amount of non-audit services that were not pre-approved is expected to constitute no more than 5% of the
total amount of fees paid by the Company and its subsidiaries to the Auditor during fiscal year in which the services are provided;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | the Company or a subsidiary did not recognize the services as non-audit at the time of the engagement; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | c) | the non-audit services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee prior to the completion of the audit and
are approved by the Committee or by one or more of its members to whom authority to grant such approvals has been delegated by the Committee.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | vi) | Ensure disclosure of any specific policies or procedures adopted by the Committee to satisfy pre-approval requirements
for non-audit services by the Auditor.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | vii) | Review the relationship of non-audit fees to audit fees paid to the Auditor, to ensure that the Auditors
independence is maintained.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | viii) | Ensure that both the audit and non-audit fees are disclosed to shareholders by category.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ix) | Review the performance of the Auditor and approve any proposed discharge and replacement when circumstances warrant.
Consider with management and the Auditor the rationale for employing accounting/auditing firms other than the Auditor. Report on the foregoing to the Board.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





page A-4



---

| | x) | At least annually, consult with the Auditor, out of the presence of management, about significant risks or exposures,
internal controls and other steps that management has taken to control such risks, and the fullness and accuracy of the organizations financial statements. Particular emphasis should be given to the adequacy of internal controls to expose any
payments, transactions, or procedures that might be deemed illegal or otherwise improper.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | xi) | At least annually, receive input from the CEO and/or the CFO on audit quality, quality of engagement team, and
relationship with the auditor.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | xii) | Oversee the work of the Auditor engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other
audit, review or attestation services.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | xiii) | Ensure that the Auditors are prohibited from providing the following non-audit services and determining which other
non-audit services the independent auditors are prohibited from providing:
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | a) | bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Company;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | financial information systems design and implementation;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------



| | c) | appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions, or contribution-in-kind reports;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | d) | actuarial services;
| | -- | -------------------



| | e) | internal audit outsourcing services;
| | -- | ------------------------------------



| | f) | management functions or human resources;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------



| | g) | broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| | h) | legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------



| | i) | any other services which the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board determines to be impermissible.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | xiv) | At least every 5 years, perform a comprehensive review of the Auditor, including a comprehensive review of the
firms history with the Auditor.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | F. | Provide oversight of Internal Audit as follows:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------



| | i) | Review and approve the mandate, risk assessment, audit coverage, planned areas of focus, budget and staffing of internal
audit.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii) | Review the independence of the internal audit function.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------





page A-5



---

| | iii) | Review the quarterly report of the leader of internal audit regarding internal audit findings, and the Companys
progress in remedying any audit findings.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iv) | Quarterly, meet with the leader of internal audit to discuss the adequacy of the Companys internal controls,
significant risks and other matters.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | v) | Annually assess the performance of the leader of internal audit, including the role and effectiveness of internal audit
in the overall context of the Companys risk management and control system.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | G. | Financial Reporting Processes
| | -- | -----------------------------



| | i) | In consultation with the Auditor, review the integrity of the organizations financial and accounting controls and
reporting processes, both internal and external.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii) | Consider the Auditors judgments about the quality and appropriateness, not just the acceptability, of the
Companys accounting principles and financial disclosure practices, as applied in its financial reporting, particularly about the degree of aggressiveness or conservatism of its accounting principles and underlying estimates and whether those
principles are common practices or are minority practices.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iii) | Consider and approve, if appropriate, major changes to the Companys accounting principles and practices as
suggested by management with the concurrence of the Auditor and ensure that the accountants reasoning is described in determining the appropriateness of changes in accounting principles and disclosure.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | H. | Review of Results related to External and Internal Audits
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------



| | i) | Discuss with the Auditor (i) the Auditors internal quality-control procedures; and (ii) any material
issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the Auditor, or by any inquiry of investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five years, respecting one or more independent
audits carried out by the Auditor, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii) | Review and approve hiring of employees or former employees of the Auditor and former independent auditor for senior
financial positions.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iii) | Establish regular and separate systems of reporting to the Committee by each of management and the Auditor regarding any
significant judgments made in managements preparation of the financial statements and the view of each as to appropriateness of such judgments.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iv) | Review the scope and plans of the Auditors audit and reviews prior to the audit and reviews being conducted. The
Committee may authorize the Auditor to perform supplemental reviews or audits as the Committee may deem desirable.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





page A-6



---

| | v) | Following completion of the annual audit and quarterly reviews, review separately with each of management and the
Auditor any significant changes to planned procedures, any difficulties encountered during the course of the audit and reviews, including any restrictions on the scope of work or access to required information and the cooperation that the Auditor
received during the course of the audit and reviews.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | vi) | Review any significant disagreements among management and the Auditor in connection with the preparation of the
financial statements.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | vii) | Where there are significant unsettled issues the Committee shall ensure that there is an agreed course of action for the
resolution of such matters.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | viii) | Review with the Auditor and management significant findings during the year and the extent to which changes or
improvements in financial or accounting practices, as approved by the Committee, have been implemented. This review should be conducted at an appropriate time subsequent to implementation of changes or improvements, as decided by the Committee.
| | ----- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ix) | Review the activities, organizational structure, and qualifications of the CFO, the financial reporting staff and ensure
that succession planning issues are raised for consideration to the Board.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | I. | Review with the Companys General Counsel the Companys legal and ethics compliance matters including:
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | i) | the Companys systems that ensure that the Companys financial statements, reports and other financial
information disseminated to governmental organizations and the public satisfy legal requirements;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii) | Legal and regulatory compliance matters; that could have a significant impact on the Companys financial
statements.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iii) | Compliance with Canadian, U.S. and other international securities law requirements;
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iv) | the CEO and CFOs written certification of the annual and interim financial statements and MD&A and the Annual
Information Form; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | v) | An annual review of the Companys compliance program.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------



| | J. | Oversight of Risk Management (Enterprise Risk Management)
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------

In overseeing the Companys risk management function, the Committee shall review, monitor, report and, where appropriate, provide
recommendations to the Board on the following:



| | i) | Managements program of risk assessment and steps taken to address significant risks or exposures, including
insurance coverage.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





page A-7



---

| | ii) | The Companys privacy and cyber security risk exposures and measures taken to protect the security and integrity of
its management information systems and company data.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iii) | Managements assessment of the internal control risks and exposures to the Company and the steps management has
taken or will take to minimize such risks.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iv) | Ensure that the disclosure process followed by the Board and its committees, in the oversight of the Companys
management of principal business risks, is complete and fairly presented.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | v) | The Corporations crisis management and response plans and business continuity plans (including work stoppage and
disaster recovery plans).
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | K. | General
| | -- | -------



| | i) | Conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within the Committees scope of responsibilities. The
Committee shall be empowered to retain independent counsel, accountants and other professionals to assist it in the conduct of any investigation.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii) | Establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iii) | Ensure disclosure in the Annual Information Form if, at any time since the commencement of most recently completed
financial year, the issuer has relied on any possible exemptions for Audit Committees.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | iv) | Perform any other activities consistent with these Terms of Reference, the Companys Articles and By-laws and all
relevant laws and regulations, as the Committee or the Board deems necessary or appropriate.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | v) | Conduct a Committee annual self-evaluation and report to the Board of Directors.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|IV. | ACCOUNTABILITY
|--- | --------------



| | A. | The Committee Chair has the responsibility to make periodic reports to the Board, as requested, on audit and financial
matters relative to the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B. | The Committee shall report its discussions to the Board by maintaining minutes of its meetings and providing an oral
report at the next Board meeting.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | C. | The minutes of the Audit Committee should be filed with the Corporate Secretary.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------





page A-8



---

Appendix One: Definitions Related to Audit Committee Composition

Affiliated Person under SEC Rules

An affiliated
person, in accordance with the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, means a person who directly or indirectly controls the Company, or a director, executive officer,
partner, member, principal or designee of an entity that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Company.

Financial Literacy Under National Instrument 52-110

Financially literate, in accordance with NI 52-110, means that the director has the ability to
read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the
Companys financial statements.

Financial Expert Under SEC Regulation S-K

A person will qualify as financial expert if he or she possesses the following attributes:



|a) | an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|b) | the ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates,
accruals and reserves;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|c) | experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of
complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Companys financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons
engaged in such activities;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|d) | an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|e) | an understanding of audit committee functions.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------

A person shall have acquired such attributes through:



|a) | education and experience as a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, public accountant
or auditor or experience in one or more positions that involve the performance of similar functions;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|b) | experience actively supervising a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, public
accountant, auditor or person performing similar functions;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|c) | experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with respect to the preparation,
auditing or evaluation of financial statements; or
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|d) | other relevant experience.
|-- | --------------------------





page A-9