alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000919640
<NAME> SUPERTEL HOSPITALITY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       9,532,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,157,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,331,725
<PP&E>                                     108,740,409
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,365,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             103,405,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,047,217
<BONDS>                                     63,534,321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,400
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,812,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               103,405,644
<SALES>                                     46,344,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,344,815
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,008,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,215,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,529,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,696,497
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,594,832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,101,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,101,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
        

</TABLE>
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia

ATLA NTA,

_________________ ___ The Court of

Appeals he reby passes

the followi

ng order: A15A0123. WILMA ISAOLAv. HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DALTONWHITFIELD & MURRAY, INC. This case ori ginated as a dispossess ory pr oceeding in

magis trate cou

rt. Following

an advers e ruling, defendant Wilma Isaola appealed to the super ior court. T he superior court also ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and Isaola filed this direct appeal fr om the superior c ourt’s o rder. We lack j urisdiction
. Because the superi or court’ s or der disposed of a de n ov o ap pea l fr om a magis trate court decision, Isaola was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge , 216 Ga. A pp. 366, 36 7 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). I saola’ s failure to f ollow this procedure

deprives u s of jurisdicti on to con sider thi s appeal, whi ch is hereb y DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, At

lanta,_____

_______________ I certify t

hat the abo ve is a true extrac t fro m the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signature a nd the seal of said court hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 09/29/2014 September 29, 2014
# C_2008285EN.01000501.xml

| 8.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-305/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Combined transport of goods between the Member States - Directive 92/106/EEC - Final road haulage leg forming an integral part of a combined transport operation - Nearest suitable railway station)

(2008/C 285/06)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Zavvos and K. Simonsson, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: S. Chala, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 2 and 4 of Council Directive 92/106/EEC on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States (OJ 1992 L 368, p. 38) — Final road haulage leg forming an integral part of a combined transport operation — Requirement of a Greek road transport authorisation

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 224, 16.9.2006.

1

---
# C_2011340EN.01003403.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/34

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — De Buggenoms and Others v Commission

(Case F-45/06 REV)

(Civil Service - Procedure - Application for revision - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure of the Tribunal - Decision of the Tribunal - Application for revision relating to an order for removal from the register following withdrawal from the proceedings - Res judicata - Absence - Inadmissibility raised by the Tribunal of its own motion)

2011/C 340/68

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Sandrine De Buggenoms and Others (Hoeilaart, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and J. Herrmann, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for revision brought by the applicant against the order of the First Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal on 16 September 2010, in Case F-45/06.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the application for revision as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application for revision as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the parties applying for revision to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties applying for revision to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union, intervener in the revision proceedings, to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union, intervener in the revision proceedings, to bear its own costs.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7664

PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL, Aboriginal Republic of North 

America Larnad Aboriginal Minister,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JUDGE MARY COVINGTON; PAT MCCRORY; ROY COOPER; ATTORNEY 

GENERAL IRVIN NATHAN,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00756-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peace Elluvasun Allah Cush-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Peace Elluvasun Allah Cush-El appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Cush-El v. Covington, No. 1:14-cv-00756-TDS-LPA

(M.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.18
 CONSENT OF IAN GLAZIER
   1.
    
    The technical report dated March 14, 2011, as amended March 30, 2011, entitled Red Lake Gold Operation, Ontario,
Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Red Lake Report); and
 2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information
relating to the Red Lake Report and the Red Lake Gold Mines, and the properties described
therein.
  Date: March 31, 2011/s/ Ian GlazierName:
    Ian Glazier, P. Eng.
STATE of North Carolina v. Felix Eugene ALLEY, IV, Defendant.

No. COA15-43.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 6, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 99

                      UNIVERSAL AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                            ----------------------------------------
                                                                 2004                     2003
                                                            ---------------          ---------------
<S>                                                         <C>                      <C>
Earnings (loss) per share:

BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS)  PER COMMON SHARE
Numerator:
        Net (loss) before extraordinary gain                $   (2,157,845)          $     (974,470)
        Extraordinaty gain                                       9,886,328                        -
                                                            --------------           --------------
        Net Income (Loss)                                   $    7,728,483           $     (974,470)
                                                            ==============           ==============

Denominator:
        Weighted average common shares outstanding              10,159,384                8,224,949
        Effect of dilutive securitiesd
              Conversion of preferred srock                      3,014,380                        -
               Common stock equivalents from
                warrants and options                               303,244
                                                            --------------           --------------
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share               13,477,008                8,224,949
                                                            ==============           ==============
BASIC
        (Loss) before extraordinaty gain                    $        (0.21)          $        (0.12)
        Extraordinary gain                                            0.97                        -
                                                            --------------           --------------
                                                            $         0.76           $        (0.12)
                                                            ==============           ==============
DILUTED
        (Loss) before extraordinaty gain                    $        (0.16)          $        (0.12)
        Extraordinary gain                                            0.73                        -
                                                            --------------           --------------
                                                            $         0.57           $        (0.12)
                                                            ==============           ==============
</TABLE>
# C_2023189EN.01004201.xml

| 30.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/42

---

Action brought on 19 April 2023 — Studiocanal v EUIPO — Leonine Distribution (ARTHAUS)

(Case T-203/23)

(2023/C 189/56)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Studiocanal GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde and C. Zimmer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Leonine Distribution GmbH (Munich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ARTHAUS — EU trade mark No 6 988 216

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2023 in Case R 1532/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, in so far as it found the application for a declaration of invalidity admissible in the light of Article 59(1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, in so far as it found the application for a declaration of invalidity admissible in the light of Article 59(1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 63(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 12(1)(b) and Article 15(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Tara Nicole LABINSKI.

No. 60P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Leslie S. Robinson, Greenville, for Labinski.

John W. Congleton, Assistant Attorney General, Clark. Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 654 S.E.2d 740.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th day of February 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 15th day of February 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
STATE v. WEAVER.

No. COA08-354.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Gaston (04CRS69848).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, No Error in part.
STATE v. James Allen TURNAGE, Jr.

No. 228A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Catherine F. Jordan, David W. Boone, Assistant Attorney Generals, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Staples Hughes, Appellate Defender, for Turnage.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of August 2008 by Defendant to Dismiss State's Appeal:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of October 2008."
```

                                                                EXHIBIT 14.(A).1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-139021 and 333-111932) and Form F-3 (No.
333-128847) of our report dated July 13, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Tefron Ltd. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F)
for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ Kost, Forer, Gabbay & KASIERER
----------------------------------
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
A Member of Ernst & Young Global

Haifa, Israel
July 13, 2010
```
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 5196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C.. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, IAIMS.
    Date: March 11, 2005.
    Time: 1 pm. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, Board Room, 
2nd Floor, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Hua-Chuan Sim, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, 
6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-1832 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# CE2004084EN.01022401.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/224 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/224

---

(2004/C 84 E/0269)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3206/03

by Antonio Tajani (PPE-DE) to the Council

(30 October 2003)

Subject:   Search made of the offices of the newspaper ‘Il Giornale’: violation of press freedom in Italy

Subject:

On Friday, 17 October 2003 the main office of ‘Il Giornale’, the major Italian daily which is currently investigating the takeover of Telekom Serbia by Telecom Italia, was searched by decision of the Perugia Public Prosecutor's Office. The search by the police forces lasted 13 hours, at the end of which a considerable amount of material belonging to journalist Gian Marco Chiocci was confiscated. It is believed that the only charge against the journalist is that of defamation of a Rome magistrate via the press.

Does the Council consider that these decisions represent a blatant violation of freedom of the press and freedom of expression?

Does the Council consider that these decisions violate the EU Council of Ministers recommendations of 8 March 2000 to the Member States, under which no interceptions, inspections or searches may be carried out where such measures tend to infringe a journalist's right not to reveal his sources?

Does the Council not consider the decisions of the Perugia Public Prosecutor's Office to be contrary to the European Court of Human Rights' famous Goodwin ruling, which acknowledged the right of journalists to professional secrecy?

Does the Council not also consider that the decisions of the Perugia Public Prosecutor's Office are contrary to the European Court of Human Rights ruling No 33400/96 of 15 July 2003, which clearly stated that searches of newspaper offices to ascertain the sources of articles are a serious violation of the freedom of expression?

Reply

(9 March 2004)

(9 March 2004)

The Council does not comment on cases under jurisdictional procedure nor does it interpret rulings of the European Court of Human Rights with respect to individual cases.

---
# C_2008022EN.01001202.xml

| 26.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 November 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Malta

(Case C-508/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 96/59/EC - Article 11 - Waste management - Disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls - Failure to communicate the required plans and outlines)

(2008/C 22/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and D. Lawunmi, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Malta (represented by: S. Camilleri, L. Farrugia, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 11 of Council Directive 96/59/EC of 16 September 1996 on the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCB/PCT) (OJ 1996 L 243, p. 31) — Failure to prepare and communicate to the Commission within the period laid down the plans, outlines and summaries of inventories prescribed by the directive

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to communicate the plans and outlines required under Article 11 of Council Directive 96/59/EC of 16 September 1996 on the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCB/PCT), the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of the Directive, read in conjunction with Article 54 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to communicate the plans and outlines required under Article 11 of Council Directive 96/59/EC of 16 September 1996 on the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCB/PCT), the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of the Directive, read in conjunction with Article 54 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Malta to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Malta to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.

1

---
STATE v. Edward WILLIAMS, III.

No. 318P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Edward Williams, III, Marion, for Williams, Edward (III).

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Gary W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of September 2015 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."