alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004078EN.01043901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/439 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/439

---

(2004/C 78 E/0460)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2853/03

by Richard Corbett (PSE) to the Commission

(26 September 2003)

Subject:   Port Services Directive: attacks on Parliament by Commission official

Subject:

Is it true that a Commission civil servant, Wolfgang Elsner, speaking at the International Maritime Organisation Congress in Barcelona, attacked the European Parliament decision to exclude pilotage services from the Port Services Directive, describing Parliament as ‘anti-business’?

Did the Commission authorise one of its civil servants to make such a political attack and, if not, what will it do to prevent a re-occurrence of such incidents?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(28 October 2003)

(28 October 2003)

The Honourable Member can be assured that the Commission official he mentioned did not make such comments at the Barcelona International Maritime Organisation Conference.

---
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 480 

To amend the Antitrust Modernization Commission Act of 2002, to extend 

the term of the Antitrust Modernization Commission and to make a 

technical correction. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2007 

Mr. KOHL (for himself, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. SPECTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Antitrust Modernization Commission Act of 

2002, to extend the term of the Antitrust Modernization 

Commission and to make a technical correction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Antitrust Moderniza5 tion Commission Extension Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TERMINATION. 

7 Section 11059 of the Antitrust Modernization Com8 mission Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) is amended— 


bajohnson on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 480 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘30 days’’ and inserting ‘‘60 

2 days’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘section 8’’ and inserting ‘‘sec4 tion 11058’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 Amendment No. 1 to
  x
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
   o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
   EOP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
    
    36-4156801(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)Two North Riverside Plaza,
Suite 2100, Chicago, Illinois(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    60606(Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code (312) 466-3300
   Title of each class
    
    Name of each exchange on which registered4.750% Notes due March 15, 2014
    
    New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
   x o
 o x
 x o
 o
  x o o
 o x




---



##### 



Explanatory Note




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  EOP Operating Limited PartnershipJuly 24, 2006By:
    Equity Office Properties Trustits general partnerBy:
    /s/ Stanley M. StevensStanley M. StevensExecutive Vice President, Chief Legal Counsel
and Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description
    
    Location31.1
    
    Certifications of
Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Securities
Exchange Act, as
amended
    
    Filed herewith31.2
    
    Certifications of
Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
of the Securities
Exchange Act, as
amended
    
    Filed herewith32.1
    
    Certifications of
Chief Executive
Officer and Chief
Financial Officer
pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
    
    Filed herewith
STATE v. Marvin Wade MILLSAPS.

No. 374P13-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Barry H. Bloch, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Marvin W. Millsaps, Norlina, for Millsaps, Marvin Wade.

Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of July 2015 by Defendant to Reconsider:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Ervin, J. recused
STATE of North Carolina, v. Danras Damoy BUNSIE, Defendant.

No. COA 15-111.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 20, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
# C_2023278EN.01001203.xml

| 7.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/12

---

Appeal brought on 13 February 2023 by Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 14 December 2022 in Case T-526/20, Devin v EUIPO — Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry

(Case C-77/23 P)

(2023/C 278/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry (represented by: D. Dimitrova, and I. Pakidanska, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Devin EAD

By order of 27 June 2023, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry should bear its own costs.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.**

 

**Certification of Gregory F. Hughes, Treasurer ofWyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole general partner of the Registrant,pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18**

**of the United States Code**

 

I,Gregory F.Hughes, Treasurer of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole generalpartner of Reckson Operating Partnership, L. P. (the “Company”), certifypursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

1)              The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2)              The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   November 12, 2010 | By     | /s/  Gregory F. Hughes                      |
|--------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | Gregory  F. Hughes                          |
|                                 |   | Treasurer                                   |
|                                 |   | of  Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC,             |
|                                 |   | the  sole general partner of the Registrant |

 

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Rashawn MACKEY.

No. 241P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Brendan O'Donnell, Attorney at Law, for Mackey, Rashawn.

*281Jennifer Harjo, Wilmington, Attorney at Law, for Mackey, Rashawn.

Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 16th of July 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th of July 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
In the Matter of The ESTATE of John Van LINDLEY. appealed by Virginia L. Livingston and Virginia L. Simpson.

No. 436P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Paul Stam, Apex, W. Eric Medlin, Greensboro, for Livingston & Virginia L. Simpson.

Vance Barron, Jr., Greensboro, for Nexsen Pruet Adams Kleemeier.

William E. Wheeler, High Point, for Walter L. Hannah.

Elizabeth B. Johnson, Pro Se.

John Van Lindley, Jr., Pro Se.

Karen Carter Martin, Pro Se.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of September 2007 by Respondent (Virginia L. Livingston and Virginia L. Simpson) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina *26Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
----

(2004/C 65 E/176)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2489/03

by Sérgio Marques (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(25 July 2003)

Subject:   State of implementation of aid for Venezuela

Following the tragic floods which hit Venezuela in December 1999, the Commission allocated a substantial amount of funding to support reconstruction in the areas affected, the purpose being to aid reconstruction in Vargas State and to support risk prevention, i.e. the drawing-up and implementation of programmes aimed at the management of natural risks in a vast area adjacent to that struck by the 1999 floods, in Falcon, Miranda and Yaracuy States.

With regard to the projects on ‘Support for reconstruction and disaster prevention in Vargas State’ (Community contribution: EUR 25 million) and ‘Social reconstruction in Vargas State’ (Community contribution: EUR 10 million), signature of the financing agreement by the Venezuelan national authorities is being awaited for implementation to commence.

With regard to the programme on ‘Flood prevention in Falcon, Yaracuy and Miranda States’ (Community contribution: EUR 20 million), a Commission decision on the allocation of the relevant appropriations was expected in the first half of 2003.

A European Parliament delegation, of which I formed part, visited Venezuela between 7 and 9 July 2003 and observed that there has been a series of delays in the approval and implementation of these projects, largely on account of differences of opinion between the Commission and the Venezuelan authorities concerning the tax arrangements for the Community projects (exemption from VAT on goods and services).

Can the Commission answer the following:

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(24 September 2003)

----
**Exhibit 32.1****SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**          In connection with the Annual Report of enherent Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Pamela Fredette, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                         /s/ Pamela Fredette   Pamela Fredette   Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentMarch 30, 2006   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting, the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto enherent, Corp. and will be retained by enherent Corp. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In the Matter of D.G.

No. 391A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 17, 2008.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for D.G.

James R. Glover, for Juvenile.

James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of November 2008 by State of NC for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. State of NC shall have up to and including the 17th day of December 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with *903this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of November 2008."
EAST TOWN MARKET, L.P. v. 550 FOODS, LLC.

No. 324P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th of September 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
STATE v. BISHOP.

No. COA07-1305.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Sampson (06CRS2078, 06CRS4521, 06CRS50793, 06CRS50794).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
aksn8k20101124ex10-1.htm










Exhibit 10.1







Piper Acquisition III, Inc.


2901 W. Coast Highway, Suite 350


Newport Beach, California 92663







November 23, 2010







David Roff, CEO & CFO


ARKSON NEUTRACEUTICALS CORP.


27 Chicora Avenue


Toronto Ontario, Canada







Re:           Contribution Agreement







Dear Mr. Roff:







Reference is hereby made to that certain Contribution Agreement entered by and between Arkson Neutraceuticals Corp. (“Arkson”), David Roff (“Roff”) and Piper Acquisition III, Inc. (“Piper”) dated November 4, 2010 (the “Agreement”).  In consideration of the payment of $7,500 by Piper to Arkson, the letter agreement shall serve to amend the following provisions of the Agreement:







Section 2.4 of the Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:







“2.4  Closing.  The parties hereto shall use their best efforts to close the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the “Closing”), by December 31, 2010.”







Section 6.2(j) of the Agreement be amended and restated as follows:







“(j) the Purchaser and the Majority Stockholder shall have entered into an agreement whereby the Majority Stockholder shall return to the Purchaser 325,000 shares of common stock of the Purchaser (prior to the planned 9:1 reverse stock split) for cancellation (the “Share Cancellation”) in consideration of the payment $300,000 (the “Roff Fee”); provided, however, the prior payment of $30,000 as provided to Jody M. Walker, as escrow agent, representing the refundable portion of the Roff Fee, and $7,500 provided directly to Roff by Piper on or about November 23, 2010 shall be applied towards the Roff Fee.”







[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]






  





  











  











If the above correctly reflects our understanding and agreement with respect to the foregoing matters, please so confirm by signing this letter agreement in the space provided below, effective as of the date first mentioned above.







Very truly yours,












PIPER ACQUISITION III, INC.












By: /s/ Tim Betts



	
Name:

	
Tim Betts


	
Title:

	
Chief Executive Officer

















ACCEPTED AND AGREED


as of November 24, 2010







ARKSON NEUTRACEUTICALS CORP.












By: /s/ David Roff



	
      Name:

	
David Roff


	
      Title:

	
CEO & CFO

















NAME OF SHAREHOLDERS












                /s/ David Roff                               


David Roff
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BERNARD WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 28 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,522
<SECURITIES>                                     4,343
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                       459
<INVENTORY>                                      1,565
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,639
<PP&E>                                           6,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,490
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,126
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,115
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,375
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    99
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,143
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,143
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      *****


      PRT Group Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

      FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of PRT Group Inc.
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for
consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
follows:

      RESOLVED, That the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of this
corporation be amended by changing the First Article thereof so that, as amended
said Article shall be and read as follows:

      "the name of the Corporation is enherent Corp. (the "Corporation").

      SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors,
a special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and
held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware at which the necessary number of shares as required by
statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

      THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

      ACCORDINGLY, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation
is hereby amended so as to change the First Article thereof to read as follows
in its entirety:

      "the name of the Corporation is enherent Corp. (the "Corporation")."

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation as caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by Dan S. Woodward, its Chief Executive Officer and
President this _12th___ day of July, 2000.


            PRT Group Inc.

      By:   /s/
          --------------------
      Name: Dan S. Woodward
      Title: CEO & President
**Exhibit 15.1**
**STATEMENT REGARDING PREDECESSORINDEPENDENT****PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS’ CONSENT**
     We have attempted and have been unable to obtainfrom Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”) a consent forthe reissuance of their report on our consolidated balancesheets of On2 Technologies, Inc and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cashflows for the years then ended, nor for the reissuance of theirreport on our supplemental schedule for the years endedDecember 31, 2001 and 2000. As such, we will be including acopy of Andersen’s prior audit reports in the filing andwill prominently disclose the fact that the report is a copy andthat it has not been reissued by Andersen.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 712 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize the exclusion 

from gross income of parking and transportation fringe benefits and 

to provide for a common cost-of-living adjustment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2007 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize 

the exclusion from gross income of parking and transportation fringe benefits and to provide for a common costof-living adjustment, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commuter Benefits 

5 Equity Act of 2007’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 712 IS

1 SEC. 2. UNIFORM DOLLAR LIMITATION FOR ALL TYPES OF 

2 TRANSPORTATION FRINGE BENEFITS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 132(f)(2) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation on exclusion) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘$100’’ in subparagraph (A) 

7 and inserting ‘‘$200’’, and 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘$175’’ in subparagraph (B) 

9 and inserting ‘‘$200’’. 

10 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT CONFORMING AMEND11 MENTS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 132(f)(6) of the In12 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to inflation adjust13 ment) is amended— 

14 (1) by striking the last sentence, 

15 (2) by striking ‘‘1999’’ and inserting ‘‘2008’’, 

16 and 

17 (3) by striking ‘‘1998’’ and inserting ‘‘2007’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

20 December 31, 2006. 

21 SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS. 

22 Section 7905 of title 5, United States Code, is 

23 amended— 

24 (1) in subsection (a)— 

25 (A) in paragraph (2)(C) by inserting 

26 ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•S 712 IS

1 (B) in paragraph (3) by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

2 and inserting a period; and 

3 (C) by striking paragraph (4); and 

4 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(A) by amending sub5 paragraph (A) to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(A) a qualified transportation fringe as 

7 defined in section 132(f)(1) of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986;’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS