alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Patriot Day, 2005

Four years have passed since our country was brutally attacked on a quiet September morning. On that day, thousands of innocent lives were taken from us. The victims and the families who lost loved ones remain in the hearts and prayers of our Nation. We also remember the courage of the firefighters, police officers, emergency rescue personnel, and scores of private citizens who showed us the true meaning of heroism and demonstrated our resolve to the world.

The mission that began on September 11, 2001, continues. Today, we see the virtue of the September 11th heroes embodied in our military personnel, who are taking the fight to our enemies and helping to keep us safe at home. Thousands of other Americans, from intelligence analysts to border guards to countless others, are doing vital work to help defend America and prevent future attacks. We are grateful to all of these men and women and to their families for their service and sacrifice. We honor those who have lost their lives defending our freedom, and we pray that God comfort their families. We pledge that we will not rest until we have won the war on terror.

As we mark this solemn anniversary, I call upon all our citizens to express their patriotism and their gratitude for the blessings of liberty. By flying the flag, supporting military families, and teaching young people about our founding ideals, we honor the lives lost on September 11, 2001, and since, and we help preserve our freedom for future generations.

By a joint resolution approved December 18, 2001 (Public Law 107-89), the Congress has designated September 11 of each year as “Patriot Day.”

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim September 11, 2005, as Patriot Day. I call upon the Governors of the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, as well as appropriate officials of all units of government, to direct that the flag be flown at half-staff on Patriot Day. I call upon the people of the United States to observe Patriot Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities, including remembrance services, to display the flag at half-staff from their homes on that day, and to observe a moment of silence beginning at 8:46 a.m. eastern daylight time to honor the innocent victims who lost their lives as a result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.                          ( print page 54468)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-18370

Billing code 3195-01-P
# CE2004078EN.01019901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/199 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/199

---

(2004/C 78 E/0204)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2965/03

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(8 October 2003)

Subject:   Endometriosis research funding

Subject:

How much funding has been provided by the EU towards endometriosis research in the past three years?

Answer given by Mr Busquin on behalf of the Commission

(10 November 2003)

(10 November 2003)

The Commission has not funded proposals addressing specifically endometriosis research in the last three years.

A project funded in the Fifth Research and Technological Development Framework Programme: ‘Life Sciences Programme’ (Key action environment and Health) on ‘Comparison of exposure-effect pathways to improve the assessment of human health risks of complex environmental mixtures of organohalogens’ partly addresses this disease; it studies possible associations of environmental exposure and endometriosis. As endometriosis is not the main focus of this project it is, however, not feasible to estimate the specific funding for endometriosis in this project.

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5195-5196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1831]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections

[[Page 5196]]

552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel; Biomedical Informatics.
    Date: March 22, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Hua-Chuan Sim, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, 
6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-1831 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# CE2004088EN.01002601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/26

---

(2004/C 88 E/0028)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1345/03

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(3 April 2003)

Subject:   EU penalties for collusion by European banks with the Baghdad regime

Subject:

Recent newspaper reports have carried details of the Baghdad regime's financial network, which consists of a great many European banks. These banks are mainly French or German, but also include the omnipresent Italian bank BNL.

In the ‘Full final and complete declaration’ submitted by Iraq to the UN experts, these banks are in fact referred to as the Iraqi Central Bank's ‘correspondent banks’, which bore the cost of the letters of credit issued by the Iraqi Central Bank for the purchase of suspicious materials. They include the German banks Dresdner Bank, Deutsche Bank, Commerz Bank, Vereins-und West Bank, UBAE, Berliner Handels-und Frankfurter Bank, DG Bank, Westdeutsche Landesbank and Bayerische Landesbank, and the French banks Banque de France, Société Générale, Crédit Lyonnais, BNP, Crédit Commercial de France and UBAF.

Does the Commission not consider it very serious that some of the most prominent institutions in the European banking system, along with other western establishments, should gladly have supported at a financial level the Baghdad regime's large-scale operations to purchase chemical weapons and weapons of mass destruction, even during the embargo?

What urgent steps will it take to penalise these banks for colluding with the criminal activities of the Baghdad regime?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(6 May 2003)

(6 May 2003)

The Commission is not aware of the financial network linking the Iraqi regime to the major European banks referred to by the Honourable Member, including the alleged purchase of prohibited material by Iraq.

The UN has imposed restrictions on transfers to Iraq through the UN Security Council Resolution 661 (1990), but these restrictions have been implemented by means of national legislation and not by Community legislation.

Accordingly, the Commission does not have any power to proceed against Member States if they fail to apply these restrictions or to take appropriate measures against any organisation (e.g. banks, companies) which break national laws.

---
# CE2004088EN.01012701.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/127

---

(2004/C 88 E/0135)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3025/03

by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 October 2003)

Subject:   Human rights violations against Greeks on the island of Imbros through the Turkish national land register

Subject:

At a single stroke, the application of the law on the Turkish national land register on the island of Imbros deprives Greeks on the island and their heirs of their property and assigns it to the Turkish state.

More specifically, the application of the Turkish land register removes from the owners land which has not been cultivated or houses which have not been lived in for more than 20 years, and arbitrarily assigns them to the Turkish state. It removes all ownership and inheritance rights from anyone who has lost Turkish citizenship — because they did not serve in the Turkish army before the age of 21 — and prevents owners from claiming property which had been confiscated without compensation and illegally remains in the possession of Turkish settlers, even though the work which was supposed to have justified the expropriation has never been carried out.

It is clear that these practices are aimed at Greek owners and their heirs, who lose any legal right to ownership, in total contravention of Community law.

Bearing in mind that Turkey has the status of a candidate country for accession to the European Union and its application is to be reviewed in 2004, how will the Commission tackle this issue?

Will it intervene with the Turkish authorities with a view to restoring order and equal rights?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(14 November 2003)

(14 November 2003)

The Commission is aware of concerns about the situation of the Greek minority on the Aegean island of Imvros to which the Honourable Member refers. The Commission has recently received information referring to violation of property rights on the island.

The Commission will examine this issue in the framework of its monitoring of Turkey's respect of the Copenhagen political criteria, which include the respect of human rights and the protection of minorities. It will provide an overall assessment of the difficulties encountered by minorities in Turkey in its forthcoming Regular Report, to be published on 5 November 2003.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 12, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), IPC—Association Connecting Electronics Industries (“IPC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, since September 14, 2004,                           ( print page 54083)                        IPC has published 9 Standards, undertaken 17 New Standard Setting Activities, and continues with 56 Standard Setting Activities as Works in Progress. For further information on these activities, please go to IPC's Web site:                     *http://www.ipc.org/​status*.                

                    On September 14, 2004, IPC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 21, 2004 (69 FR 61868).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 05-18043  Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
STATE v. Windsor Devone INGRAM.

No. 283P13-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 31st of August 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 23, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01435-CV 

IRINA VALENTINA TREST, Appellant 

V. 

AH4R-TX2, LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 006-1760-2014 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Whitehill 

 By postcard dated May 18, 2015, we directed appellant to file her brief, originally due 

May 14, 2015, no later than May 28, 2015. Although cautioned that failure to comply would 

result in dismissal of the appeal, appellant has failed to file her brief. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. & 42.3(b),(c). 

141435F.P05 

 

/Bill Whitehill/ 

BILL WHITEHILL 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IRINA VALENTINA TREST, Appellant 

No. 05-14-01435-CV V. 

AH4R-TX2, LLC, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 6, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 006-1760-2014. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. 

Justices Francis and Lang-Miers 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 We ORDER that appellee AH4R-TX2, LLC recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from 

appellant Irina Valentina Trest. 

Judgment entered June 23, 2015.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED 
FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR 
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,660
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                       673
<INVENTORY>                                     92,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,123
<PP&E>                                         147,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 371,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,935
<BONDS>                                         95,249
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           179
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   371,198
<SALES>                                        365,218
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               365,218
<CGS>                                          283,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  283,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,781
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,554
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,227
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,030
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73
        

</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 65 E/129)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2213/03

by Marco Pannella (NI) to the Council

(2 July 2003)

Subject:   Imprisonment in Cuba, in inhuman and degrading conditions, of 75 opposition figures sentenced by show trial in April 2003, and the particular case of Martha Beatriz Roque Cabello

Knowing that:

The Council:

Reply

(17 November 2003)

The Council is aware of the preoccupying conditions and health situation of some political prisoners in Cuba and has made various demarches, calling for immediate release of all political prisoners and demanding that in the meantime they do not suffer unduly and are not exposed to inhumane treatment. In support of this line, steps have been taken, notably on 26 March, when the local Troika in Havana carried out a demarche expressing strong concern over the detention of dozens of Cuban dissidents by the Cuban authorities. On 5 June, the EU issued a second declaration to the Cubans expressing deep concern over the violation of the human rights of the opposition and called once again for the Cuban authorities to release all political prisoners immediately. The EU further requested that prisoners not be exposed to inhumane treatment and that access for the Red Cross be guaranteed. On 1 August a third, specific demarche was made by the EU Presidency in Rome to the Cuban Ambassador expressing preoccupation over the deteriorating health of Marta Beatriz Roque Cabello and Oscar Espinosa Chepe and requesting full access to medical care for these prisoners. HOM's are continuing to monitor the situation.

For a more complete picture of the Council's efforts in favour of Cuban dissidents, the Council refers to the answers given to various parliamentary questions recently (questions H-243/03, H-313/03, H-396/03). Furthermore, the Council would refer the Honourable Parliamentarian to the conclusions it adopted on the occasion of its meeting on 21 July regarding the re-evaluation of the EU Common Position on Cuba.

----
STATE of North Carolina. v. Raymond L. HARGETT.

No. 217P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Paul M. Green, Durham, Attorney at Law, for Hargett, Raymond.

Thomas O. Lawton, III, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Scott E. Thomas, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 23rd of June 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of June 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd of June 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Craven County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 803 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 803

To repeal a provision enacted to end Federal matching of State spending 
                  of child support incentive payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2007

Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Kohl, Ms. Snowe, and Mr. 
   Coleman) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal a provision enacted to end Federal matching of State spending 
                  of child support incentive payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Support Protection Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROVISION ENACTED TO END FEDERAL MATCHING OF STATE 
              SPENDING OF CHILD SUPPORT INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.

    Section 7309 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-
171, 120 Stat. 147) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```