alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
         <LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
         EXTRACTED FROM THE SILVER RAMONA MINING COMPANY FINANCIAL
         STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
         QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
         STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                           <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             0
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            500
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     190,798
<OTHER-SE>                                  (79,494)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     500
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
Beth DESMOND. v. The NEWS AND OBSERVER PUBLISHING COMPANY, McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., Mandy Locke, Joseph Neff, John Drescher, and Steve Riley.

No. 207P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

James T. Johnson, Raleigh, for Desmond, Beth.

John A. Bussian, Raleigh, for The News and Observer Publishing Company, et al.

Mark J. Prak, Raleigh, for N.C. Association of Broadcasters, et al.

Timothy Nelson, Raleigh, for N.C. Association of Broadcasters, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendants (The News and Observer Publishing Company, McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. and Mandy Locke) on the 22nd of June 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

> "Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd of June 2015 by Defendants (The News and Observer Publishing Company, McClatchy Newspaper, Inc. and Mandy Locke) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
EXHIBIT 31.1  Certificate of the President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


> a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
>   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
>   ensure that material information relating to LTFD, including its consolidated
>   subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
>   during the period in which this report is being prepared;
>   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of LTFD’s disclosure control’s and
>   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
>   of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
>   by this report based on such evaluation; and 
>   c. Disclosed in this report any change in LTFD’s internal control over
>   financial reporting that occurred during LTFD’s most recent fiscal quarter
>   that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
>   LTFD’s internal control over financial reporting; and

> a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
>   or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
>   likely to adversely affect LTFD’s ability to record, process, summarize
>   and report financial information; and
>   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
>   who have a significant role in LTFD’s internal control over financial
>   reporting.

/s/ JEFFREY L MINCH
  Jeffrey L. Minch
  President and Chief Executive Officer


EXHIBIT 31.2Certificate of the Chief Financial Officer
  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Kathy Scanlon, certify that:   1.   2.   3.   4.


> a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
>   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
>   ensure that material information relating to LTFD, including its consolidated
>   subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
>   during the period in which this report is being prepared;
>   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of LTFD’s disclosure control’s and
>   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
>   of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
>   by this report based on such evaluation; and 
>   c. Disclosed in this report any change in LTFD’s internal control over
>   financial reporting that occurred during LTFD’s most recent fiscal quarter
>   that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
>   LTFD’s internal control over financial reporting; and

> a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
>   or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
>   likely to adversely affect LTFD’s ability to record, process, summarize
>   and report financial information; and
>   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
>   who have a significant role in LTFD’s internal control over financial
>   reporting.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 703 

To expand the definition of immediate relative for purposes of the 

Immigration and Nationality Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2007 

Mr. KOHL (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To expand the definition of immediate relative for purposes 

of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF IMMEDIATE RELATIVE. 

4 Section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Na5 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)(A)(i)) is amended by 

6 inserting ‘‘For purposes of this subsection, a child of a 

7 parent of a citizen of the United States shall be considered 

8 an immediate relative if the child is accompanying or folVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:53 Mar 01, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S703.IS S703

hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 703 IS

1 lowing to join the parent.’’ after ‘‘at least 21 years of 

2 age.’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Dismissal and Opinion Filed June 21, 2013 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00778-CR KEVIN SHARONE MENNIEFEE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 28736-86 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lang-Miers Opinion by Justice Bridges Kevin Sharone Menniefee was convicted of attempted hindering the apprehension or prosecution of a known felon. See T EX
. P EN
. C ODE A NN . §§ 15.01(a), (d), 38.05(a), (d) (West 2011). Pursuant to a plea agreement, punishment was assessed at fourte en months’ confinement in a state jail, and was imposed in open court on July 20, 2011. The trial court certified that appellant does not have the right to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Moreover, appellant’s June 6, 2013 notice of appeal is–2– untimely as to the July 20, 2011 sentencing date. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.2(a)(1). We dismiss the appeal fo r want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 130778F.U05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
KEVIN SHARONE MENNIEFEE, Appellant
No. 05-13-00778-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court, Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 28736-86. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Moseley and Lang-Miers participating. Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered June 21, 2013

/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
----

(2004/C 33 E/121)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1462/03

by Joaquim Miranda (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(29 April 2003)

Subject:   Social situation in Portugal and Stability and Growth Pact

According to figures published this week by the Union's Statistical Office, over a fifth of the Portuguese population were threatened with poverty in 1999. Portugal thus has the highest poverty rate in the Union, 21 %, a figure that would increase to 27 % if there were no state welfare benefits (unemployment benefit and guaranteed minimum income).

This week the Commission has also predicted that unemployment in Portugal will rise by approximately 27,5 % in 2003, giving an unemployment rate of 6,5 % at the end of the year, and continue to worsen in 2004, when the number out of work will total 390 000. Furthermore, Portugal is unquestionably going through an economic recession and in 2003 will not meet the Government's initial growth forecast of 1,3 %. According to very recent IMF figures, its economic development in the period from 2002 to 2004 will be the weakest in the Union, with all the social consequences which that will entail.

However, and still within the same week, the Commission has called for strict compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact and, despite the disastrous social scenarios referred to above, recommended that spending in areas such as education, health, and social security be cut as a matter of priority.

The Commission:

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(6 June 2003)

----
<PAGE>   1

[i3 MOBILE LOGO]


                                                                EXHIBIT 10.3(a)

December 20, 2000


Mr. Jeff Klein
5116 Westshore Drive
New Port Richey, FL 34652


Re:     Notice to Exercise Royalty Buy Down Option


Dear Jeff:

Reference is made to the Employment and Royalty Agreement dated October 27, 1998
by and between yourself and i3 Mobile, Inc. (formerly Intelligent Information
Incorporated) (the "Agreement").

In accordance with Section II of the Agreement, as of November 30, 2000, the
outstanding royalty payable to you is three hundred forty-four thousand nine
hundred and eighty-five dollars and eighty-five cents ($344,985.85) (the
"Outstanding Royalty"). Paragraph 14 of the Agreement provides that i3 Mobile
may, at its option and at any time, elect to accelerate royalty payments thereby
reducing the Outstanding Royalty by $3.00 for each $2.00 actually paid. Please
be advised that, effective upon the date of this letter, i3 Mobile will exercise
this option to buy down the entire Outstanding Royalty. i3 Mobile will tender
the sum of two hundred twenty-nine thousand nine hundred and ninety dollars and
fifty-seven cents ($229,990.57) in full satisfaction of its royalty obligations
under the Agreement (the "Buy Down Amount").

By countersigning the enclosed copy of this letter you agree that the Buy Down
Amount fully satisfies i3 Mobile's royalty obligations to you. You further agree
that in consideration of receipt of the Buy Down Amount, you hereby fully,
irrevocably and unconditionally release and discharge i3 Mobile, its current and
former officers, directors, stockholders, affiliates, attorneys, agents or
employees (the "Released Parties") from any and all claims, demands, suits,
promises, omissions, damages, obligations, liabilities and expenses (including
attorneys' fees and costs), of every kind and nature, known or unknown, which
you ever had or now have against the Released Parties arising under Section II
of the Agreement.


Sincerely,
i3 Mobile, Inc.                                       Agreed and Accepted:



John A. Lack                                     /s/ Jeff Klein
                                               ---------------------------
President and CEO                                    Jeff Klein
Joshua WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff, v. Jennifer WHITFIELD, Defendant.

No. COA15-543.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Jan. 5, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2




                                       March 23, 1998


Mr. Tom Travis
Sandler & Travis Trade Advisory Services, Inc.
5200 Blue Lagoon Drive
Miami, Florida  33126-2022

                                                        SENT VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Dear Mr. Travis:

I am writing as a follow-up to our telephone conversation concerning the
reference to Sandler & Travis Trade Advisory Services, Inc. as the source of
certain apparel industry information that was included in the Tropical
Sportswear Int'l Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 1997. Attached to this correspondence is a copy of the Company's
Annual Report that includes the paragraphs where the industry data you provided
was quoted. Please signify your consent for the use of your name associated with
this data by signing at the space provided below. Please return the original of
this letter to me in the enclosed prepaid Federal Express envelope and retain a
copy for your own files.

Thank you in advance for your assistance with this matter and if you should have
any questions, please feel free to call me at 813-249-4900, extension 1068.

                                      Sincerely,

                                          /s/ N. Larry McPherson

                                      N. Larry McPherson
                                      Executive Vice President - Finance & 
                                      Operations




SANDLER & TRAVIS TRADE ADVISORY SERVICES, INC.

       /s/ Tom Travis
----------------------------------------------
Signature

       Managing Director
----------------------------------------------
Title

       3/26/98
----------------------------------------------
Date
COUNTY OF DURHAM v. DAYE.

No. COA07-1036.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Durham (03CVS457).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
STATE v. Reginald U. FULLARD.

No. 42P15-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

Reginald Fullard, Polkton, for Fullard, Reginald U.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of April 2015 by Defendant for Appeal Orders Entered 15 April 2015:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."
STATE of North Carolina v. Demar Ryan WORRELL.

No. 247P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Kristin L. Todd, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Worrell.

Amar M. Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 660 S.E.2d 183.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 2nd day of June 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of June 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*532"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Aug. 22, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-15294

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-80888-CV-DTKH

JULIEN GARCON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, 

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

RICK BRADSHAW, 

U.S. MARSHALS (Detainer), 

Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(August 22, 2008)

Before WILSON, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
 The district court construed the habeas petition as brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1

despite the fact that Garcon was a federal detainee at the time. Because Garcon was a federal

pre-trial detainee, the petition should have been construed as brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(1); Hughes v. Att’y Gen. Of Fla., 377 F.3d 1258, 1261-1261 (11th

Cir. 2004).

2

Julien Garcon, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his petition for habeas relief, 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After a 1

thorough review, we affirm.

While a pre-trial detainee, Garcon filed the instant habeas petition arguing 

(1) his indictment was invalid; (2) the court lacked jurisdiction to hear his criminal

case; (3) counsel had been ineffective; (4) the grand jury was selected in a racially

discriminatory manner; (5) his arrest warrant was not supported by probable cause;

and (6) there were violations of the Speedy Trial Act. Upon the magistrate judge’s

recommendation, the district court dismissed the petition because Garcon had not

been brought to trial as of the date of filing and he was represented by counsel in

his up-coming criminal case. Garcon now appeals.

The availability of habeas relief under § 2241 is a question of law that we

review de novo. Sawyer v. Holder, 326 F.3d 1363, 1364 n.4 (11th Cir. 2003). We

note that since the filing of the instant petition, Garcon has been convicted of

possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and was scheduled for sentencing.

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the
3

petition. The claims Garcon sought to raise are properly brought during his

criminal case and subsequent direct appeal, should he choose to file one. 

Therefore, the instant petition was premature and was due to be dismissed.

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina. v. Grant Ruffin HAYES.

No. 127P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Glenn Gerding, for Hayes, Grant Ruffin.

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 7th of April 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North *204Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of April 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
**EXHIBIT 4****Consent of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants**We consent to the use of our reports dated March 26, 2007 relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Goldcorp Inc. and management’s report on the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting (which report on the financial statements expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to our report to the shareholders of GoldcorpInc. on our audit conducted in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards offinancial statements for the same period and referring to changes in accounting principles thathave a material effect on the comparability of the financial statements) appearing in the AnnualReport on Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-126037,333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040 and 333-138760 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 26, 2007appearing in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.