alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated financial statements of Twin City Bancorp,
Inc. and Subsidiaries in the filing to which this schedule is an
exhibit and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,910
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,984
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,650
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 20,794
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             0
<LOANS>                                     76,873
<ALLOWANCE>                                    220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,345
<DEPOSITS>                                  90,387
<SHORT-TERM>                                     0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,158
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,000
<COMMON>                                       854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             107,345
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,305
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              685
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                57
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,407
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,007
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,078
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,969
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   64
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (2)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                848
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     848
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   512
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0
<LOANS-NON>                                      0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    0
<RECOVERIES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 676 Referred in House (RFH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 676

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2007

              Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To provide that the Executive Director of the Inter-American 
   Development Bank or the Alternate Executive Director of the Inter-
 American Development Bank may serve on the Board of Directors of the 
                       Inter-American Foundation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO APPOINT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OR ALTERNATE 
              EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 
              TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN 
              FOUNDATION.

    The third sentence of section 401(g) of the Foreign Assistance Act 
of 1969 (22 U.S.C. 290f(g)) is amended to read as follows: ``Three 
members of the Board shall be appointed from among the following: 
officers or employees of agencies of the United States concerned with 
inter-American affairs, the United States Executive Director of the 
Inter-American Development Bank, or the Alternate Executive Director of 
the Inter-American Development Bank.''.

            Passed the Senate March 15, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                     2593145 
<SECURITIES>                               8092368 
<RECEIVABLES>                              2076600 
<ALLOWANCES>                               (212392)
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          12133327 
<PP&E>                                    10187809 
<DEPRECIATION>                            (4239148)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            24471477 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4473252 
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      9571 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                     12 
<OTHER-SE>                                18631268 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              24471477 
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           7453372 
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (8916270)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (119165)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1255789)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (114903)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1370692)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (1370692)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.13)
        

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/1581Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/1581 of 18 September 2015 appointing a Danish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/1581                     

# of 18 September 2015

# appointing a Danish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Danish Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116/EU(1), 2015/190/EU(2) and 2015/994/EU(3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January                              2020.

(2)An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms                              Lotte CEDERSKJOLD ENGSIG-KARUP,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term                     of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:                  
          -  Mr Steen BORDING ANDERSEN, *Aarhus City Council Member*                          

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Dieschbourg                            

1

OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.                           

2

OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.                           

3

OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.
----

(2004/C 65 E/175)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2473/03

by Marie Isler Béguin (Verts/ALE), Charles Tannock (PPE-DE), Alima Boumediene-Thiery (Verts/ALE), Patsy Sörensen (Verts/ALE) and Miquel Mayol i Raynal (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(24 July 2003)

Subject:   Regions adjacent to the enlarged Union's external borders

The current process of enlargement towards the east will, in the near future, alter the EU's political, economic and social makeup, as harmonisation, protection and transitional aid measures are applied in the applicant central European and Baltic countries.

Given their particular sensitivity to this process of economic alignment, during the successive enlargements of the EU the eastern border regions of the Member States and, subsequently, the applicant countries, have benefited from special programmes and aid intended to guard against and mitigate imbalances and socio-economic repercussions within their borders. The western border regions of the European countries neighbouring the enlarged EU, such as Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine, are primarily and intrinsically dependent on the interregional economy and trade with their many partners on the EU side of the border. These three eastern European countries, which form part of our continent's history and identity, are directly concerned by the implications of the EU enlargement process at all levels. The current Moldovan and Belarussian governments' predecessors clearly stated their wish to join the EU, and this has remained a priority for the current Ukrainian Government.

On 11 February 2003 the European Parliament adopted a report by Pedro Marset Campos on ‘relations between the European Union and Belarus: towards a future partnership’, in which it called on the Commission, ‘in order to prevent any cracks from appearing in the economic or social structure at the future eastern border of the enlarged EU and to curb smuggling and immigration, to develop Community financial programmes and support for the western regions of the new neighbours to the East, Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova, on the same scale as those already being implemented in the eastern regions of the neighbouring candidate countries’.

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(17 September 2003)

----

(1)  COM(2003) 104 final.

(2)  COM(2003) 393 final.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           8,139
<SECURITIES>                                    46,836
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (788)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,402
<PP&E>                                           8,153
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,095
<SALES>                                         23,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,925
<CGS>                                            1,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    25
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,482)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,751
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,751
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 54229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18239]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 54229]]


                Notice of September 8, 2005

                
Notice Continuation of the National Emergency 
                With Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks

                Consistent with section 202(d) of the National 
                Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
                for 1 year the national emergency I declared on 
                September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect 
                to the terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center, New 
                York, New York, and the Pentagon, and the continuing 
                and immediate threat of further attacks on the United 
                States.

                By Executive Order 13223 of September 14, 2001 and 
                Executive Order 13253 of January 16, 2002, I delegated 
                authority to the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 
                of Transportation to order members of the Reserve 
                Components to active duty and to waive certain 
                statutory military personnel requirements. By Executive 
                Order 13235 of November 16, 2001, I delegated authority 
                to the Secretary of Defense to exercise certain 
                emergency construction authority. By Executive Order 
                13286 of February 28, 2003, I transferred the authority 
                delegated to the Secretary of Transportation in 
                Executive Order 13223 to the Secretary of Homeland 
                Security.

                Because the terrorist threat continues, the national 
                emergency declared on September 14, 2001, and the 
                measures taken on September 14, 2001, November 16, 
                2001, and January 16, 2002, to deal with that 
                emergency, must continue in effect beyond September 14, 
                2005. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an 
                additional year the national emergency I declared on 
                September 14, 2001, with respect to the terrorist 
                threat. This notice shall be published in the Federal 
                Register and transmitted to the Congress.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    September 8, 2005.

[FR Doc. 05-18239
Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Nijel Ramsey LEE-BEY.

No. 416P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Nijel Ramsey Lee, for Lee, Nijel Ramsey.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 14th of December 2015 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
TED K. BROWN

,

Petitioner,

v.

VALERIE HAYS BROWN

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4509

Opinion filed December 21, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Ted K. Brown, pro se

, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE and WINSOR, JJ., CO NCUR.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7520

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PAUL PARKER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-325-A, CA-01-1098-AM) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Paul Parker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Parker , Nos. CR-97-325-A; CA-01-1098-AM (E.D. Va. July 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
BRIDGES v. MURRAY, et al.

No. 121P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of March 2008 by Plaintiff for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of October 2008."
Willie SPAULDING v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. formerly known as Alliedsignal, Inc., Holtrachem Manufacturing Company LLC, Hotrachem GP, Inc., Bruce Davis, and Herb Roskind.

No. 390P07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 23, 2008.

J. Jerome Hartzell, Thomas N. Barefoot, Howard Twiggs, Donald H, Beskind, Raleigh, John C. Bell, Jr., James L. Bentley, Joel O. Wooten, Jr., Columbus, GA, for Spaulding.

J. Donald Cowan, Jr., Jeri L. Whitfield, Greensboro, Richard A. Schneider, J. Kevin Buster, Michael R. Powers, Atlanta, GA, for Honeywell.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 646 S.E.2d 645.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th day of December 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for rehearing, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of January 2008."

Upon consideration of the alternative petition filed by Plaintiff on the 13th day of December 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of January 2008."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [REG-156518-04]
          - RIN 1545-BE10

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to a notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Friday, August 12, 2005 (70 FR 47155) relating to the anti-cutback rules under section 411(d)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pamela R. Kinard at (202) 622-6060 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing (REG-156518-04) that is the subject of this correction is under section 411(d)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.

## Need for Correction

As published, REG-156518-04 contains an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

## Correction of Publication

Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing (REG-156518-04), which was the subject of FR Doc 05-15960, is corrected as follows:

                    On page 47155, column 2, in the preamble, under the caption                     **ADDRESSES**                    , line 17, the language, “156581-04). The public hearing will be” is corrected to read “156518-04). The public hearing will be.”.                

Cynthia Grigsby,

Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations, Legal Processing Division,  Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).

[FR Doc. 05-17959 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2055 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2055 of 10 November 2015 laying down the conditions for setting out the programme            for emergency vaccination of bovine animals against lumpy skin disease in Greece and amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1500            (notified under document C(2015) 7671) (Only the Greek text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2055                     

# of 10 November 2015

# laying down the conditions for setting out the programme for emergency vaccination of bovine animals against lumpy skin disease                        in Greece and amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1500                     

# *(notified under document C(2015) 7671)*

# (Only the Greek text is authentic)

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2008 of 15 November 2016 concerning animal health control measures relating to                                 lumpy skin disease in certain Member States (notified under document C(2016) 7023) (Text with EEA relevance ).