alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004070EN.01019101.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/191 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/191

---

(2004/C 70 E/201)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3005/03

by Albert Maat (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 October 2003)

Subject:   Classification of albumin

Subject:

At present in the EU albumin from hens' eggs is classified in the ‘non-Annex I’ product group (CN 3502/1190/1990/2091/2099). This has given rise to the following anomalous situation: when an egg is separated, the yolk remains an agricultural product, but the albumin is classified as an industrial product. Although albumin was used for industrial purposes in the past, the situation has now changed completely and it is used in the food sector.

I

This inappropriate classification is placing egg producers who export albumin at a serious disadvantage, given that they are forfeiting substantial volumes of export refunds.

Can the Commission state how and when it intends to deal with this ‘anomaly’, which has a serious adverse impact on European egg producers?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(11 December 2003)

(11 December 2003)

The Honourable Member is referred to the Commission's answers to Written Questions P-2696/03 (1) and P-2976/03 from Mr Kindermann (2).

1

2

---

(1)  See page 129.

1

(2)  See page 182.

2

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Latasha Javonne HOLLAND.

No. COA15-441.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 1, 2016.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Ronald FARROW.

No. 1P16.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Farrow, Ronald.

Richard L. Harrison, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Ben R. David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 31st of December 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 31st of December 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, New Hanover County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
STATE v. Michael Orlando COOK.

No. 254P08-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

Michael Orlando Cook, Lumberton, for Cook, Michael Orlando.

Derrick Mertz, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

William R. West, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*516The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of January 2016 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Consolidated
Financial Statements of Maxcor Financial Group Inc. at and as of June 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Consolidated Financial
Statements
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-2000          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000          JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                               20,170,239           20,170,239
<RECEIVABLES>                        17,447,589           17,447,589
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                           0                    0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                         0                    0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                   8,362,482            8,362,482
<PP&E>                                6,647,327            6,647,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       70,363,529           70,363,529
<SHORT-TERM>                                  0                    0
<PAYABLES>                            4,394,528            4,394,528
<REPOS-SOLD>                                  0                    0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                           0                    0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                            0                    0
<LONG-TERM>                           1,371,102            1,371,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 2,000,000            2,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                   0                    0
<COMMON>                                 11,392               11,392
<OTHER-SE>                           29,338,672           29,338,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         70,363,529           70,363,529
<TRADING-REVENUE>                       628,320              635,646
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                    468,968              890,681
<COMMISSIONS>                        34,556,641           75,190,664
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                 0                    0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                 0                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      127,055              265,862
<COMPENSATION>                       25,900,707           55,672,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         660,249            4,247,795
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              660,249            4,247,795
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0                    0
<CHANGES>                                     0                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            307,872            2,571,207
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.04                 0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.04                 0.30




</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Stratus      Services Group, Inc.**

| 1. | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: January                9, 2007 | By:    | /s/                Joseph J. Raymond                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   | Joseph                J. Raymond                     |
|                                       |   | Chairman                of the Board of Directors,   |
|                                       |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
# C_2009006EN.01002001.xml

| 10.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/20

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 13 November 2008 — SPM v Council and Commission

(Case T-128/05) (1)

1

(Non-contractual liability of the Community - Common organisation of the markets - Bananas - Rules for importing of bananas from ACP countries into the European Union - Lawful or unlawful conduct - Loss allegedly suffered by independent ACP producer)

(2009/C 6/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Société des plantations de Mbanga SA (SPM) (Douala, Cameroon) (represented initially by P. Soler Couteaux and S. Cahn, then by S. Cahn, B. Doré and A. Farache, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. De Gregorio Merino, M. Balta and A. Westerhoff Löfflerova, Agents) and Commission of the European Communities (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and L. Visaggio, Agents)

Defendants:

Re:

Action for damages pursuant to Article 235 EC and the second paragraph of Article 288 EC, based, principally, on the unlawful conduct of the Council and the Commission in the establishment of the rules relating to the import of bananas into the Community and, alternatively, on the liability of the Community in the absence of unlawful conduct by those two institutions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Société des plantations de Mbanga SA (SPM) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Société des plantations de Mbanga SA (SPM) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 9.7.2005.

1

---
STATE v. Jeremy Lynn BENFIELD.

No. 22P16-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 17, 2016.

David Kirkman, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Jeremy Lynn Benfield, Brunswick, for Benfield, Jeremy Lynn.

Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th of January 2016 by Defendant-Appellant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of March 2016."

HUDSON, J. recused.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6343

RONALD DENNIS WILLIAMS,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SHANTICIA HAWKINS,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-hc-02160-BO)

Submitted: July 21, 2022 Decided: July 26, 2022

Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Dennis Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6343 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/26/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Dennis Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as 

untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 

(2012) (explaining that § 2254 petitions are subject to one-year statute of limitations, 

running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez, 565 

U.S. at 140-41 (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6343 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/26/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.10

[Consent
of KPMG LLP]

Accountants'
Consent

The
Board of Directors
Allstream Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 40-F and the registration statement No. 333-107678 on
Form S-8 of Allstream Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2004 relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Allstream Inc. as at December 31, 2003, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the period from April 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003.

KPMG LLP
Toronto, Canada
January 30, 2004

---

Accountants'
Consent

The
Board of Directors
Allstream Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 40-F of Allstream Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2003, except as to
notes 1, 8 and 25, which are as of February 25, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of AT&T Canada Inc. ("the Company") as at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and
the related consolidated statements of operations and deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002.

Our
report contains Comments by the Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada  U.S. Reporting Differences which states that in the United States,
reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast
substantial doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Our report to the shareholders is
expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not permit a reference to such conditions and events in the auditors' report when these are adequately disclosed in the financial
statements.

In
addition, in the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there is a change in accounting
principles that has a material effect on the comparability of the Company's financial statements, such as the change described in note 2(e) to the consolidated financial statements. Our
report to the shareholders is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not require a reference to such a change in accounting principles in the auditors' report when the
change is properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.

KPMG LLP
Toronto, Canada
January 31, 2003

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40203

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

IVAN TREVINO-LAVALLE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-1762-2

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ivan Trevino-Lavalle has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Trevino-Lavalle has not filed a response. Our independent

review ofthe record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
# National Days of Prayer and Remembrance, 2005

Americans will always remember the terrible events and violent cruelty of September 11, 2001. We will always honor the many innocent lives that were lost, and we will never forget the heroism of passengers, first responders, and others on that day. During this year's National Days of Prayer and Remembrance, we pay tribute to the memory of those taken from us in the terrorist attacks in New York, in Pennsylvania, and at the Pentagon. We pray for the families left behind who continue to inspire us through their steadfast character, courage, and determination.

In the time since September 11, 2001, Americans have come together to defend America and advance freedom. We are grateful to our brave men and women in uniform who are making daily sacrifices at home and at posts around the globe, and we pray for their safety as they defend our liberty. In the war on terror, we have lost good men and women who left our shores to protect our way of life and did not live to make the journey home. We honor their memories, and we pray for their families.

The war that began for America on September 11, 2001, continues to call on the courage of our men and women in uniform and the perseverance of our citizens. The past 4 years have brought many challenges and sacrifices, yet we have much reason to be thankful and hopeful about the future. America has become more secure as terrorists have been brought to justice, two of the most brutal and aggressive regimes have ended, and freedom has spread in the Middle East and around the world. In the months and years ahead, we will continue to defend our freedom and lay the foundations of peace for our children and grandchildren.

During these Days of Prayer and Remembrance, we give thanks to the Almighty for our freedom, and we acknowledge our dependence on the Giver of this gift. Four years after September 11, 2001, we remember the lives lost and pray for God's continued blessings on their families and our Nation.

                    NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Friday, September 9, through Sunday, September 11, 2005, as National Days of Prayer and Remembrance. I ask that the people of the United States and places of worship mark these National Days of Prayer and Remembrance with memorial services and other appropriate ceremonies.                          ( print page 54466)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-18369

Billing code 3195-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6548

WILLIAM J. CLAYBROOKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROSALYN E. PUGH, Clerk of the Circuit Court,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:08-

cv-00624-PJM)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William J. Claybrooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William J. Claybrooks, a Maryland prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing as legally frivolous Claybrooks’

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Claybrooks v. Pugh, No. 8:08-cv00624-PJM (D. Md., Mar. 18, 2008). Further, we deny Claybrooks’

motions for the appointment of counsel and for transcripts at

Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXI Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form  10-QSB
for  the  period  ended September 30, 2002,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc.,  the  Managing General Partner  of  the  Partnership,
certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                           /s/ Robert P Johnson
                               Robert P. Johnson, President
                               AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                               Managing General Partner
                               November 1, 2002
Re:
    
    Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between LaCrosse Footwear, Inc.(Borrower) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Lender),
dated as of March 1, 2009, as amended (Credit Agreement)
    provided




---



##### 



Very truly yours, 
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION/s/ James R. BednarkJames R. BednarkSenior Vice President




---



##### 



CONSENT
   LACROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC.
    
    
    
    DANNER, INC./s/ Joseph P. Schneider
    
    
    
    /s/ Joseph P. SchneiderJoseph P. Schneider
    
    
    
    Joseph P. SchneiderPresident/Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    President/Chief Executive Officer/s/ David Carlson
    
    
    
    /s/ David CarslonDavid Carlson
    
    
    
    David CarlsonExecutive Vice President, Chief
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Secretary
    
    
    
    Financial Officer and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 178 (Thursday, September 15, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54478-54479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18341]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD05-05-110]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Wrightsville 
Channel, Wrightsville Beach, NC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is implementing the special local regulations 
at 33 CFR 100.513 during the Wilmington YMCA Triathlon to be held 
September 24, 2005, on the waters of Wrightsville Channel, Wrightsville 
Beach, North Carolina. This action is necessary to provide for the 
safety of life on navigable waters during the event. The effect will be 
to restrict general navigation in the regulated area for the safety of 
participants and vessels transiting the event area.
    Enforcement Dates: 33 CFR 100.513 will be enforced from 6:30 a.m. 
to 8:30 a.m. on September 24, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.M. Sens, Project Manager, Fifth 
Coast

[[Page 54479]]

Guard District, Operations Division, Auxiliary and Boating Safety 
Branch, at (757) 398-6204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Wilmington YMCA will sponsor the 
Wilmington YMCA Triathlon on September 24, 2005 on the waters of 
Wrightsville Channel, Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina. The event 
will involve approximately 1100 swimmers competing along a course 
within the regulated area. In order to ensure the safety of the 
swimmers and transiting vessels, 33 CFR 100.513 will be enforced for 
the duration of the event. Under provisions of 33 CFR 100.513, a vessel 
may not enter the regulated area unless it receives permission from the 
Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
    In addition to this notice, the maritime community will be provided 
extensive advance notification via the Local Notice to Mariners, marine 
information broadcasts, local radio stations and area newspapers, so 
mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.

    Dated: August 31, 2005.
L.L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05-18341 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P