alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

      Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                                  to 
                         Certificate Holders

                                                         Ending
Class         Interest        Principal        Losses    Balance
<S>           <C>             <C>              <C>       <C> 
A1             4,787,819.55   2,622,942.08        0.00   162,608,590.92
A2               727,708.35           0.00        0.00    24,950,000.00
A3             1,481,228.46     258,336.47        0.00    50,629,130.53
A4                     0.00           0.00        0.00       267,322.00
A5                 3,080.00           0.00        0.00       105,600.00
APO                    0.00       3,631.76        0.00       515,871.24
AR                   679.40           0.00        0.00            78.00
B1               116,843.07      15,001.29        0.00     3,996,998.71
B2                25,541.22       3,279.20        0.00       873,720.81
B3                21,929.91       2,815.55        0.00       750,184.45
B4                 7,280.85         934.77        0.00       249,065.22
B5                10,976.60       1,382.95       26.28       375,490.40
M                 73,012.37       9,373.93        0.00     2,497,626.07





</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 65 E/207)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2731/03

by Mihail Papayannakis (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(10 September 2003)

Subject:   Framework agreement on customs union between Turkey and the northern part of Cyprus

The Turkish Government has signed a ‘framework agreement’ on customs union with the self-proclaimed ‘Turkish Democracy of North Cyprus’, which is neither an independent state nor a recognised entity under international law or UN resolutions.

Since the signing of this agreement represents a flagrant violation of the principles of international law, the UN charter and the Security Council's decisions and the principles and decisions of the EU and conflicts with the institutional framework of relations between the EU and the Republic of Cyprus as well as with Turkey's application for accession, could the Commission say whether its opinion was sought before the signing of the ‘framework agreement’, whether that agreement is consistent with the principles and provisions of the association and customs union agreements between Turkey and the EU, and whether it considers that it is likely to influence Turkey's progress towards accession and the evaluation of its candidature by the competent Community bodies?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-2679/03 and P-2731/03

given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(1 October 2003)

The Commission regrets the signing on 8 August 2003 of the so called ‘customs union framework agreement’ between Turkey and northern Cyprus (TRNC). This ‘agreement’ has no legal validity under international law and was signed without any prior consultation with the Union. The Union has made it clear to the Turkish Government that ratification of the so called ‘framework agreement’ would be in breach with the customs union between the Community and Turkey and would not be conducive to a settlement of the Cyprus problem.

With regard to the fears expressed by the Honourable Members concerning exports from northern Cyprus, the Commission wishes to underline that in order to benefit from the preferential treatment provided for by the EC-Cyprus Association Agreement, imports from Cyprus must be covered by origin certificates issued by the recognised authorities in accordance with the decision of the Court of Justice from 1994 (Anastasiou Pissouri Ltd and Others). The Origin certificates are checked by the customs authorities of the Member States. If products covered by irregular certificates were to be released for circulation, the Commission and Member States could take the appropriate measures at customs level.

----
Exhibit
10.4

    (English
Translation)

     

    Registration
Notice of Cancelling Equity Pledge

     

    (Daxin Industry and Commerce)
Cancelling Equity Pledge Registration NO.: [2010] 7

     

    Dalian Union-Chuangye
Bonding Co. Ltd:

     

    According
to application, our bureau processes the registration for cancelling equity
pledge on September 10th, 2010.
The original equity registration is below:

     

    Equity
registration NO.: 210231100040Z

     

    Company
who own Equity Rights: Dalian Heavy Mining Equipment Manufacturing, Co.
Ltd

     

    Amount of
Equity: 6,400,000 RMB

     

    People
who pay for Equity: Lixin Wang

     

    People
who own Equity: Dalian Union-Chuangye Bonding Co. Ltd

     

    Seal by
Dalian Industry and Commerce Bureau

     

    September
10th,
2010
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Lee FURR.

No. 245P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Paul F. Herzog, for Furr, Christopher Lee.

William P. Hart, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Rick Shaffer, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of July 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SURENDER KUMAR,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 71100

Agency No. A088

- 129

- 637

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 24, 2016 **

Before: REINHARDT, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Surender Kumar , a native and citizen of India , petitions for review of th e

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his a ppeal from an immigration

judge’ s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, w ithholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 2 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 71100

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for sub stantial evidence the

agency’ s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinati ons created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034,

1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010), and w e deny the petition for review.

Substanti al e vidence supports the agency’ s adverse credibility

determination based on inconsistencies regarding police visits, whether Kumar’s

father beat his brother

, and when Kumar sold his shop. See id. at 1048 (adverse

credibility determination was reasonable unde r the totality of circumstances).

Kumar’s contention that the IJ misstated his testimony with regard to the number

of times police visited his house is belied by the record. In the absence of credible

testimony, Kumar’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v.

Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Substantial ev idence also supports the agency’ s denial of Kumar’s CAT

claim because it was based on the same evidence found not credible, and he does

not point to any other evidence that compels the finding that it is more likely than

not that he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the

government if returned to India

. See Shrestha , 590 F.3d at 1048

- 49.

PETITION FOR R EVIEW DENIED.
----

(2004/C 33 E/143)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1618/03

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Commission

(13 May 2003)

Subject:   Structural and Cohesion Funds in Portugal (repeat question)

In Written Question P-0976/03 (1) I asked the Commission about a significant utterance by Mr Verheugen to the effect that the Commission would propose that the level of support for Portugal in the forthcoming financial package should remain more or less the same. It was natural to believe that his words reflected a consensus within the Commission. Although it was supposed to provide the necessary information, the answer failed in the end to address the key question, which I am therefore repeating.

In reality, what Mr Barnier said fell substantially short of the promise that Mr Verheugen made in Portugal. The written reply stated merely that a decision had still to be reached in the discussions on future Community cohesion policy after 2006 and the proposals on the financial perspective for that period would be submitted at a later date. It was consequently not possible to indicate at the present time roughly how much funding might be allocated to Portugal after 2006.

Can the Commission answer the following:

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(5 August 2003)

As mentioned in the answer to the Honourable Member's Written Question P-0976/03, the future shape of Community cohesion policy after 2006 is still being discussed within the Institution.

The interview of the Member of the Commission responsible for Enlargement, and in particular the statement mentioned by the Honourable Member, was variously reported in several Portuguese newspapers (Diário Económico, Correio da Manhã, etc.). He was in fact referring to the well-known position of the Commission that the so-called ‘statistical effect’ of enlargement should be taken into account for the period 2007-2013, to avoid penalising certain regions of the present Member States that otherwise would not be eligible for Objective 1 support in an enlarged Union.

In the third cohesion report at the end of 2003, the Commission will present its economic and social proposals for future cohesion policy after 2006. The financial perspective proposals for the post-2006 period will be presented later. The Commission can already inform the Honourable Member that it will be seeking a fair and meaningful solution for the regions that will suffer the ‘statistical effect’ due to the fall in the Community's average per-capita gross domestic product (GDP).

----

(1)OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,068
<INVENTORY>                                      4,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,061
<PP&E>                                         178,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 378,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,994
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           482
<OTHER-SE>                                     299,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   378,134
<SALES>                                         67,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,773
<CGS>                                           60,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,312
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,426
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,328
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,098
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,098
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .10
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Elrico Darnell FOWLER.

No. 164A00-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Faith Bushnaq, Reita Pendry, Charlotte, for Fowler.

Alvin Keller, Marsha Goodenow, Assistant Attorney Generals, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th day of July 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
# CE2004088EN.01035201.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/352 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/352

---

(2004/C 88 E/0358)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1321/03

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Commission

(8 April 2003)

Subject:   Angola — return of refugees

Subject:

The Media have reported complaints from the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) about the violation of the rights of Angolan refugees seeking to leave the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Congo and Zambia and return to Angola.

The same source claims that the refugees have been forced to pay for illegal taxis or hand over some of their possessions at frontier posts on both sides of the border, and that there are rumours of women being raped and a great deal of discrimination being practised.

Ester Benazri, the official responsible for refugee protection, believed that such situations can only be due to the fact that the displaced populations did not wait for official repatriation, which begins only next May and she forecast that the situation would improve with an increased UNCHR and international community presence in the border areas.

The Commission:

| — | what information has it concerning these matters; |
| --- | --- |

—

what information has it concerning these matters;

| — | what approaches has it made or will it make to the countries involved, with a view to putting an end to these human rights violations as soon as possible? |
| --- | --- |

—

what approaches has it made or will it make to the countries involved, with a view to putting an end to these human rights violations as soon as possible?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(15 May 2003)

(15 May 2003)

The Commission is aware of reports of abuses which some Angolan refugees returning spontaneously from neighbouring countries are allegedly suffering. The reports speak of abusive practices such as harassment, robbery, sexual abuse and extortion, particularly at the Democratic Republic of Congo/Angola border. Such practices, if proven, would be in contravention of the Tripartite Agreements governing the repatriation of refugees signed in November and December 2002 by the Government of Angola, the United Nations High Commissioner for Regugees (UNHCR), and the respective governments of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Namibia, the Republic of Congo and Zambia.

Whilst the Angolan government is the prime actor to intervene to put a stop to such practices, the Commission undertakes to raise this issue with the UNHCR in view of its role as signatory to the Tripartite Agreements and holder of the special mandate for refugees. Moreover, the Commission will examine these issues within the framework of any future Community financing of interventions to support the repatriation of refugees.

Furthermore, should these allegations be confirmed and persist, the Commission will, in close collaboration with Member States' representations in the countries involved, consider the appropriate steps to take vis-à-vis the national authorities.

---
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2090Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/2090 of 17 November 2015 appointing a German member of the Committee of the Regions

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2090                     

# of 17 November 2015

# appointing a German member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 January, 5 February and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116(1), (EU) 2015/190(2) and (EU) 2015/994(3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January                              2020.

(2)A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Jacqueline                              KRAEGE,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as a member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2020:                  
          -  Frau Heike RAAB, *Staatssekretärin, Bevollmächtigte des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz beim Bund und für Europa, für Medien und Digitales*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 17 November 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

J. Asselborn                            

1

OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.                           

2

OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.                           

3

OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.
August 12, 2015 

Mr. Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk 

Third Court of Appeals of Texas 

P.O. Box 12547 

Austin, Texas 78711 

RE: Robert Ritz vs. State 

 03-14-00403-CR 

Dear Mr. Kyle, 

Please be advised that Mr. Brian Erskine will be appearing before the Court on September 23, 

2015 at 9:00 a. m. to present oral argument in the above-mentioned case. Should you have any 

questions, please contact our office. 

Best regards, 

Wes Mau 

Criminal District Attorney 

712 S. Stagecoach Trail, Suite 2057 

San Marcos, Texas 78666 

Ph: (512) 393-7600 / Fax: (512) 393-2246 

State Bar No.: 0074539 

wes.mau@co.hays.tx.us 

Attorney for the State 

Cc: Linda Icenhauer-Ramirez 

 1103 Nueces 

 Austin, Texas 78701 

 ljir@aol.com

WES MAU

Criminal District Attorney

Hays County Government Center 

712 South Stagecoach, Suite 2057 

San Marcos, Texas 78666 

(512)393-7600 FAX (512)393-2246 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00403-CR

6458990

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/12/2015 10:45:03 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/12/2015 10:45:03 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donna Brandin, ChiefFinancial Officer of Equity Residential, general partner of ERPOP, certify,pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.

 
| /s/                     | Donna Brandin |   |
|-------------------------|---------------|--------|
| Donna Brandin           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| of Equity Residential   |
| May 9, 2005        |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 52405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given by the National 
Advisory Council on Minority Health and Health Disparities.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council on Minority Health 
and Health Disparities.
    Date: September 20, 2005.
    Closed: 8:30 a.m. to 10 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Open: 10:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: The agenda will include Opening Remarks, Administrative 
Matters, Director's Report, NCMHD, IC Health Disparities Research 
Report, NCMHD Program Highlights, and other business of the Council.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Donna Brooks, Asst. Director for Administration, 
National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National 
Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-2135, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#77150518181c04133719141a1f1359191e1f59101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66041409090d15022608050b0e0248080f0e48010910">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

    Dated: August 25, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-17514 Filed 9-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>