alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Jose Edis CARRANZA.

No. 184P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Jose Edis Carranza, Lumberton, for Carranza, Jose Edis.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

R. Andrew Murray, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st of June 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
EASTERN CAROLINA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY v. LOFTON.

No. 32PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 1, 2015.

Thomas E. Stroud, for Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority.

E. Bradley Evans, Winterville, for Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority.

John R. Keller, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

Andrew Cogdell, Morganton, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

Theodore O. Fillette, III, Charlotte, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

Cheryl A. Marteney, for Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority.

Michael J. Parrish, New Bern, for Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority.

Peter Gilbert, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

Charles Francis, Raleigh, for Raleigh Housing Authority.

Celia Pistolis, Raleigh, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

William K. Brownlee, Raleigh, for Apartment Association of North Carolina.

Ruth Sheehan, for Raleigh Housing Authority.

Alan D. Woodlief, Jr., Raleigh, for Raleigh Housing Authority.

John R. Wester, Charlotte, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

Thomas Holderness, Charlotte, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

John R. Rittelmeyer, Raleigh, for Disability Rights North Carolina.

Yasmin Farahi, for Disability Rights North Carolina.

Erik R. Zimmerman, Pro Hac Vice, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of August 2015 by Erik R. Zimmerman for Admission Pro Hac Vice:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of September 2015."
# Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/336Show full title

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/336 of 2 March 2015 implementing Decision 2013/798/CFSP concerning restrictive measures            against the Central African Republic         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/336                     

# of 2 March 2015

# implementing Decision 2013/798/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Central African Republic

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/798/CFSP of 23 December 2013 concerning restrictive measures against the Central African                           Republic(1), and in particular Article 2c thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 23 December 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/798/CFSP.

(2)On 31 December 2014, the Sanctions Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 2127                              (2013) concerning Central African Republic, deleted one person from the list of persons subject to the measures imposed by                              paragraphs 30 and 32 of UNSC Resolution 2134 (2014).

(3)The list of persons subject to restrictive measures as set out in the Annex to Decision 2013/798/CFSP should therefore be                              amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Annex to Decision 2013/798/CFSP is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 2 March 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

D. Reizniece-Ozola                            

## ANNEXU.K.

The entry in the Annex to Decision 2013/798/CFSP for the following person is deleted:

Levy YAKETE

1

OJ L 352, 24.12.2013, p. 51.
STATE of North Carolina v. Judy Naylor McPHAIL.

No. 378P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Christy E. Wilhelm, for McPhail.

Richard L. Harrison, Special Deputy Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of August 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the. North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."
DEPT. OF CORRECTION v. MEDICAL BOARD.

No. 51PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 30, 2008.

Thomas J. Pitman, Special Deputy Attorney General, Joseph Finarelli, Assistant Attorney General, for Dept. of Correction, et al.

Brian L. Blankenship, D. Todd Brosius, for Medical Board.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of April 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

*558Motion Allowed. Defendant (Medical Board) shall have up to and including the 11th day of June 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of April 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LIN
TELEVISION CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH LIN
TELEVISION CORPORATION QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q DATED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000931058
<NAME> LIN TELEVISION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,716
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,328
<PP&E>                                         198,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,534
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,052,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          201,141
<BONDS>                                        299,414
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     709,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,052,547
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,072
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (128)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,564)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,109)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,109)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
STATE v. Charles Anthony BALL.

No. 102P13-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

*315Charles Anthony Ball, Spruce Pine, for Ball, Charles Anthony.

Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of May 2015 by Defendant for Court to Provide Expert Witness and/or Investigator:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
STATE v. Michael Ray CRUMP.

No. 58P07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of November 2007 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of March 2008."
IN RE D.R.B.

No. COA08-304.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 19, 2008.

Certification Date September 8, 2008.

Appeal from Iredell (05JA143).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated.
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN Television Corporation for thethree months ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Vincent L. Sadusky, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,and hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 9, 2006     /s/ Vincent L. Sadusky     Vincent L. Sadusky  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1575

In Re: STEVEN AUBREY BURNETTE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(No. 7:99-cr-00109-jct-mfu-1)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Aubrey Burnette, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Aubrey Burnette has filed a petition for writ of

mandamus raising four claims challenging his criminal convictions

for bank robbery and firearms offenses. Mandamus relief is

available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief

sought, and no other means to seek that relief. In re First Fed.

Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further,

mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in

extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,

426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.

1987). Because Burnette was able to seek the requested relief on

these claims in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, he is not

entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, although we grant leave

to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of

mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
STATE of North Carolina v. Preston DAVIS.

No. 434P08-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Preston R. Davis, Pro Se.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 30th day of December 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
STATE v. WESLEY.

No. COA08-695.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Rutherford (06CRS55240).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We have
issued our report dated January 29, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of GameTech International,
Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended November 1, 2009.  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of GameTech International, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-122836
effective February 15, 2005, 333-72886 effective November 7, 2001, and
333-51411 effective April 30, 1998).








/s/
GRANT THORNTON LLP








Reno,
Nevada


January
29, 2010
STATE of North Carolina, v. Patricio Guilebaldo LOPEZ.

No. COA15-60.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Sept. 1, 2015.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINON**

No Error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 831/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 831/2014 of 30 July 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 831/2014                     

# of 30 July 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1)     The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  May 13, 2011 |  |  | BY:  ____________________________
RALPH M. AMATO
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 99.7****Consent of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-126037,333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-138760, 333-151243 and333-151251 on Form S-8 of our reportsdated March 11, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Goldcorp Inc. (whichreport expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to theadoption of Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Handbook Sections 1530 ComprehensiveIncome, 3251 Equity, 3855 Financial Instruments — Recognition and Measurement, 3861 FinancialInstruments — Disclosure and Presentation and 3865 Hedges, effective January 1, 2007) and theeffectiveness of Goldcorp Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPIndependent Registered Chartered Accountants
STATE of North Carolina v. Steven L. LOWERY.

No. 243P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Meghan Adelle Jones, Attorney at Law, for Lowery, Steven L.

Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 30th of June 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
Exhibit 99.18

CONSENT OF SOPHIE BERGERON

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp
Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Annual Information Form (the AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



|1. | The technical report dated April 5, 2011, entitled Cerro Negro Gold Project, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, NI 43-101 Technical Report on Updated Feasibility Study (the Cerro Negro Report);
and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Cerro Negro Report and the Cerro Negro Project, and the properties described therein.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration
Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376, 333-181116 and 333-188805 on Form S-8 of the Company.

Date: March
31, 2014



/s/ Sophie BergeronName: Sophie Bergeron, eng.
exv10w8






Exhibit 10.8




FIRST AMENDMENT TO


FUEL SALES AND LICENSING AGREEMENT




     This First Amendment to Fuel Sales and Licensing Agreement between Alon USA, LP (“Alon”) and
Alon Brands, Inc. (“Brands”), dated November 15, 2010 (this “Amendment”), amends that certain Fuel
Sales and Licensing Agreement by and between Alon and Brands, dated as of November 1, 2009 (the
“Agreement”).



WITNESSETH:




     FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Seller and Buyer agree to amend certain provisions
of the Agreement as set forth below.



1. DEFINED TERMS




     All initially capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.



2. AMENDMENTS




     a. The first sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement (Supply) is hereby amended in its entirety
to read as follows:




“The “stated quantity” shall be equal to 310,000,000 gallons per year total of
the above listed products, forecasted by terminal on a monthly basis in accordance
with the format set forth on Exhibit B.”



     b. The first sentence of the last paragraph of Section 3 (Price) is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows:




“Tax incentives related to the use of reformulated fuels such as the current
ethanol blender’s credit of $.45 per gallon will be completely passed to Brands if
in accordance with then-current industry standards.”



     c. Section 7 (Term) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:




“This Agreement will be in force and effect from the date on which Brands’
Registration Statement on Form S-1, registering certain equity securities of Brands
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Effective Date”) and shall continue until
December 31, 2030.”



     d. The second sentence of Section 8 (Placement and Handling Fee Adjustments) is hereby
amended in its entirety to read as follows:



 









 






“Alon shall give Brands notice of its receipt of any notification from a third
party that will result in an increase or decrease in Alon’s costs of transporting,
handling or terminalling Products.”



3. EFFECT OF AMENDMENT




     Except as specifically amended above, all of the original terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



     This Amendment shall not be binding on either party until both parties have executed the
Amendment by signing below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	ALON USA, LP	 	ALON BRANDS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By: Alon USA GP, LLC	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Its: General Partner	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Paul Eisman	 	By:	 	/s/ Kyle McKeen	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Paul Eisman	 	Name:	 	Kyle McKeen 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President 	 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer