alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 195/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 195/2014 of 28 February 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 195/2014                     

# of 28 February 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# C_2023235EN.01004901.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/49

---

Action brought on 28 April 2023 — VY v Parliament

(Case T-224/23)

(2023/C 235/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: VY (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

consequently

| — | annul the decision of 9 June 2022 notifying the applicant that his contract would be terminated and, in so far as necessary, the decision of 17 January 2023, notified on 23 January 2023, rejecting his complaint against the decision of 9 June 2022; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 9 June 2022 notifying the applicant that his contract would be terminated and, in so far as necessary, the decision of 17 January 2023, notified on 23 January 2023, rejecting his complaint against the decision of 9 June 2022;

| — | order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the damage suffered;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment with respect to the reasons relied on and infringement of the principle of proportionality. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment with respect to the reasons relied on and infringement of the principle of proportionality.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and, in particular, the right to be heard, the duty to state reasons, compliance with the requirement of impartiality of the administration and the duty of care. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and, in particular, the right to be heard, the duty to state reasons, compliance with the requirement of impartiality of the administration and the duty of care.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,323                       0
<SECURITIES>                                    76,640                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,937                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,838                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,294                       0
<PP&E>                                          54,446                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,620                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,633                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,794                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            18                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,821                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,633                       0
<SALES>                                         25,499                  50,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,720                  86,892
<CGS>                                            1,518                   3,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,911                  21,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,959                  65,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    74                     382
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4                       9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,266                   2,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                       748                     911
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,518                   1,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,518                   1,850
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09                    0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08                    0.10


</TABLE>
# C_2023338EN.01002402.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/24

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 July 2023 — Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals v Commission

(Case T-226/23 R)

(Interim relief - Medicinal products for human use - Marketing authorisation - Application for interim measures - Application for injunction - Lack of urgency)

(2023/C 338/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Neuraxpharm Pharmaceuticals, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: K. Roox, T. De Meese, J. Stuyck, M. Van Nieuwenborgh and C. Dumont, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Mathieu and C. Valero, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, first, suspension of operation of the decision of the European Commission contained in its letter of 17 March 2023, by which the Commission requires it to comply with the protection period for the reference medicinal product Tecfidera — Dimethyl fumarate as regards the placing on the market of the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Neuraxpharm — Dimethyl fumarate (‘DMF Neuraxpharm’) and to give written undertakings to that effect and any subsequent decision or act extending or replacing the contested measure, in so far as they concern it, and, second, an injunction requiring the Commission to refrain from taking any other measures which would amount to a withdrawal of the marketing authorisation enjoyed by it or a prohibition on placing DMF Neuraxpharm on the market.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
----

(2004/C 88 E/0626)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0989/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Siena

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Siena, urgently need to use European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions, nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and culture,

can the Commission state:

----
MOSTELLER MANSION, LLC, and Delphi Development, LLC v. MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING OF GEORGIA, INC., formerly Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.

No. 297P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

E. Thomison Holman, George Ward Hendon, Asheville, for Mosteller Mansion.

Calvin T. Vick, Jr., W. James Johnson, Asheville, Matthew W. Kitchens, for Mactec Engineering.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of June 2008 by Plaintiff (Mosteller Mansion) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 731, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5185] 

*Summary:*                     Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Clouet to Seurat: French Drawings from the British Museum,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY from on or about November 7, 2005 to on or about January 29, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*For Further Information Contact:*                     For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                 

Dated: August 31, 2005. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 05-17807 Filed 9-7-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18202]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10190]


Kansas Disaster <greek-i> KS-00004

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Kansas (FEMA--
1600--DR) dated 8/23/2005.
    Incident: Severe storms and flooding.
    Incident Period: 6/30/2005 through 7/1/2005.
    Effective Date: 8/23/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/24/2005.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort 
Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 8/23/2005, applications 
for Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of 
a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the 
address listed above or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Cherokee, Crawford, Neosho.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-profit Organizations) With Credit             4.750
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10190.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Cheri L. Cannon,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-18202 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# CE2004070EN.01005701.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/57

---

(2004/C 70 E/060)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1807/03

by Herbert Bösch (PSE) to the Commission

(23 May 2003)

Subject:   Commercial relations between the Commission and the Planistat Group

Subject:

On 19 March 2003 the European Anti-Fraud Office OLAF laid a charge against Planistat Europe SA before the Paris public prosecutor. The company is accused of being involved in fraudulent practices and, by means of fictitious accounts practices, of having helped set up illicit accounts, which were then able to be used by Eurostat officials.

The Commission's Directorate-General for Financial Control has apparently been aware of this state of affairs since spring 2000.

Could the Commission indicate why commercial relations with companies in the Planistat Group were not, however, broken off and new contracts were even awarded?

On its Internet site the Planistat Group states that it has a turnover of millions in its work for the Commission, and that it works for the following Commission Directorates-General and services:

| — | External relations DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

External relations DG;

| — | Entreprise DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

Entreprise DG;

| — | Development DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

Development DG;

| — | Research DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

Research DG;

| — | Energy and Transport DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

Energy and Transport DG;

| — | Trade DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

Trade DG;

| — | Delegations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Delegations;

| — | Forward Studies Unit; |
| --- | --- |

—

Forward Studies Unit;

| — | SCR (Joint External Relations Service); |
| --- | --- |

—

SCR (Joint External Relations Service);

| — | TACIS (EU Technical Assistance to the Commonwealth of Independent States); |
| --- | --- |

—

TACIS (EU Technical Assistance to the Commonwealth of Independent States);

| — | Industry DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

Industry DG;

| — | Health and consumer protection DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

Health and consumer protection DG;

| — | Environment DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

Environment DG;

| — | Information Society DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

Information Society DG;

| — | Taxation and Customs Union DG; |
| --- | --- |

—

Taxation and Customs Union DG;

| — | Eurostat; |
| --- | --- |

—

Eurostat;

| — | PHARE; |
| --- | --- |

—

PHARE;

| — | European Development Fund. |
| --- | --- |

—

European Development Fund.

Can the Commission confirm this information? Could the Commission state what sums have been paid to the Group over the last 10 years, with a breakdown by financial year and Directorate-General?

---
STATE v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA08-318.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Davidson (04CRS53940).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit
4.2

    


    ALLONGE NO 1 TO SECURED
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

    


    This Allonge No. 1 (“Allonge”) to
Secured Convertible Promissory Note is dated as of this 3rd day of November,
2010.  Reference is hereby made to that certain Secured Convertible
Promissory Note dated April 23, 2010 (“Note”) delivered by Intellect
Neurosciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”) to Marlin Capital
Marketing, LLC, as Lender (“Holder”).

    


    NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual promises and covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereby agree as follows.

    


    Except as expressly amended by the
terms of this Allonge, the terms of the Note remain in full force and
effect.  All capitalized terms used and not defined herein are used as
defined in the Note.  As the context requires, all references herein
to “Note” refer to the Note as amended by this Allonge.

    


    The following term of the Note is
hereby amended by this Allonge:

    


    1.           Principal
Amount.  The principal amount of the Note shall be increased by
an additional $75,000 for an aggregate principal amount of
$137,500.  Interest on the increased portion of the principal amount
of the Note shall accrue at the same rate from and after the date
hereof.

    


    2.           Conversion
Price.  The Conversion Price as defined in Section 2.1(b) of
the Note is $0.0025, subject to further adjustment as provided in the
Transaction Documents.

    


    3.           Miscellaneous.  This
Allonge must be delivered by original signature for Borrower, but the Holder may
execute and deliver by facsimile copy.

    


    
      
        	
                INTELLECT
      NEUROSCIENCES, INC.

              
	
                (“Borrower”)

              
	 
      
	
                By:

              	
                  /s/ Elliot Maza

              	 
      
	 
      	
                     Title:
      President and CFO
DEPT. OF CORRECTION v. MEDICAL BOARD.

No. 51PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 3, 2008.

Thomas J. Pitman, Special Deputy Attorney General, Joseph Finarelli, Assistant Attorney General, for Dept. of Correction, et al.

Thomas W. Mansfield, Brian L. Blankenship, D. Todd Brosius, for Medical Board.

Wallace C. Hollowell, III, Raleigh, for American Medical Asso.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of June 2008 by American Medical Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of June 2008."
STATE v. Dammion Lamont MARTIN.

No. 226P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 6, 2015.

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, for Martin, Dammion Lamont.

Sherri Lawrence, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Ernie Lee, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of July 2015 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of July 2015."