alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. COGGINS.

No. COA08-233.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 2, 2008.

Certification Date December 22, 2008.

Appeal from Jackson (06CRS50626).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1918 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1918 of 22 October 2015 establishing the Administrative Assistance and Cooperation            system (‘AAC system’) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on official controls            performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules (notified            under document C(2015) 7132) (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1918                     

# of 22 October 2015

# establishing the Administrative Assistance and Cooperation system (‘AAC system’) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of                        the European Parliament and of the Council on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed                        and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules                     

# *(notified under document C(2015) 7132)*

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1715 of 30 September 2019 laying down rules for the functioning of the information                                 management system for official controls and its system components (the IMSOC Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance).
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc. on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended July 2, 2004, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission, we, John Q. Hammons, Chief Executive Officer, and
      Paul E. Muellner, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:

            1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operation of John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc. and will be retained by John
      Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its Staff upon request.



Dated:  August 13, 2004


                                  /s/ John Q. Hammons
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  John Q. Hammons

                                  /s/ Paul E. Muellner
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Paul E. Muellner
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3712 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3712


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 9, 2008

 Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
the Committees on Education and Labor, and Ways and Means, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To make a technical correction in the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici 
         Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION IN MENTAL HEALTH PARITY EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 512(e)(2)(B) of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental 
Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (subtitle B of title V 
of division C of Public Law 110-343) is amended by striking ``January 
1, 2009'' and inserting ``January 1, 2010''.

            Passed the Senate November 20, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 572/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 572/2014 of 26 May 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 572/2014                     

# of 26 May 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 May 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
IN RE E.R.A.

No. COA08-1072.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 20, 2009.

Certification Date February 9, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (05JT224).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

LUIS FRANCO DOB: 06/07/1978

ADDRESS: X)fi4es~\

210 DASHIELL SA.TEXAS 78203 °| - &- ) 5"

COACASE NO. 04-13-00906-CR l n„

PD-0898-15 ~ ' RtCEiVEDIM

TR.CT. NO. 2013CR3379 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

BEXAR COUNTY

SEP 10 2015

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

towhom itmay concern, AbelAcosta,ClerK

I AM NEEDING A MOTION FOR EXTENSION PLEASE.WE ARE STILL CONTINUING TO

WORK WITH OUR ATTORNEY ON PAYMENTS, DUE TO BEING IN THE HOSPITAL WE ARE

CATCHING UP STILL AND I JUST STARTED WORKING AGAIN AFTER MY SITUATION IN

THE HOSPTIAL AND GETTING BACK ON MY FEET. MY SPOUSE HAS BEEN SUPPORTING

ME AND HAS BEEN DOING THIS ALL ON HER OWN WE JUST NEED MORE TIME PLEASE

TO GET BACK ON OUR FEET AND PAY THE LAWYER TO DO THE PETITION, BUT WE

NEED TO PAY THE LAWYER OFF FIRST WHICH WE ARE ALMOST THERE. PLEASE IF I CAN

GET THE EXTENSION AND GET WITH MY LAWYER REGARDING THE PETITION I WOULD

GREATLY APPRECIATE IT. IF ANY QUESITONS PLEASE CALL ME 210-461-3155

ATTORNEY: MICHAEL GROSS

FRANCO

l^^fi/^^u^-

FflED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

SEP 17 20*5

Abel Acosta, Clerk
# The Health and Social Care (Disciplinary Procedures) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2014 No. 267

Health And Social Care

# The Health and Social Care (Disciplinary Procedures) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

24th October 2014

Coming into operation

24th November 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.4.2016) by The Health and Social Care (Disciplinary Procedures) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 (S.R. 2016/104), regs. 1, **15**
STATE v. MOODY.

No. COA08-294.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 18, 2008.

Certification Date December 8, 2008.

Appeal from Northampton (05CRS51642, 06CRS56).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
WALKER v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS.

No. COA08-218.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from New Hanover (07CVS1116).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE Of North Carolina v. Robert Teon INGRAM.

No. 4P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2015.

Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Ingram, Robert Teon.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*73***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd of January 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED ELSEWHERE IN THIS FORM 10-KSB/A, AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-3-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-3-1999
<CASH>                                         106,247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    161,463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               719,953
<PP&E>                                      13,273,940
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,574,392
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,939,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,590,011
<BONDS>                                        755,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,001
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,758,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,939,988
<SALES>                                      6,932,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,932,891
<CGS>                                        1,897,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,689,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,706,582)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,706,582)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.84)
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. SILVER.

No. COA08-291.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Pitt (07CRS2525, 07CRS50226).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2375 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2375 of 26 November 2015 adopting a third update of the list of sites of Community            importance for the Black Sea biogeographical region (notified under document C(2015) 8226) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2375                     

# of 26 November 2015

# adopting a third update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Black Sea biogeographical region

# *(notified under document C(2015) 8226)* (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2329 of 9 December 2016 adopting a fourth update of the list of sites of Community                                 importance for the Black Sea biogeographical region (notified under document C(2016) 8182).
# Political and Security Committee Decision EUFOR RCA/1/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision EUFOR RCA/1/2014 of 19 February 2014 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander            for the European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA) (2014/103/CFSP) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision EUFOR RCA/1/2014                     

# of 19 February 2014

# on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR                        RCA)                     

# (2014/103/CFSP) (repealed)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/73/CFSP of 10 February 2014 on a European Union military operation in the Central African                           Republic (EUFOR RCA)(1), and in particular Article 5 thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 5 of Decision 2014/73/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee to take decisions                              on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for EUFOR RCA.

(2)The EU Operation Commander has recommended the appointment of Brigadier General Thierry LION as the EU Force Commander for                              EUFOR RCA.

(3)The EU Military Committee supports that recommendation.

(4)In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to                              the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation                              of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Brigadier General Thierry LION is hereby appointed EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in the Central                     African Republic (EUFOR RCA).                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 19 February 2014.

*For the Political and Security Committee*                            

*The Chairperson*                            

W. Stevens                            

1

OJ L 40, 11.2.2014, p. 59.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10619

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RICHARD NICHOLAS CLARK

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:06-CR-199-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Richard Nicholas Clark has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Clark has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Exhibit 32.2




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
 CHAPTER
63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Intermec, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lanny H.
Michael, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, that:
 
 (1)
              The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.
   /s/
      Lanny H. MichaelLanny
      H. MichaelChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      27, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50287

Summary Calendar

 

LEON GONZALEZ, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO; JIM WELLS, Individually and in his Official

Capacity as a San Antonio Police Officer; SOUTHWEST BELL

TELEPHONE COMPANY; J.E. GREBER, Individually and in his Official

Capacity as Administrator of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 97-50287

- - - - - - - - - -

November 3, 1997

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leon Gonzalez, Jr., appeals the dismissal, without

prejudice, for failure to state a claim of his wrongfultermination lawsuit. He contends that the district court erred

in refusing to remand the case to state court and in dismissing

his complaint. 
No. 97-50287

-2-

We have reviewed the briefs and the record and find no

error. Gonzalez’s claims were preempted by § 301 of the Labor

Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. See, e.g., Thomas v.

LTV Corp., 39 F.3d 611, 616 (5th Cir. 1994). Because he failed

to exhaust his contractual remedies prior to instituting this

lawsuit, dismissal without prejudice was appropriate. AllisChalmers Corp. v. Lueck, 471 U.S. 202, 204 n.1, 220-21 (1985).

AFFIRMED.
# CE2004078EN.01035201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/352 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/352

---

(2004/C 78 E/0370)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3863/02

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(10 January 2003)

Subject:   North Korean refugees

Subject:

Is the Commission aware that North Korean refugees in China are being forcibly repatriated to North Korea by Chinese authorities even though they are likely to face prison sentences or even execution?

Is the Commission also aware that the Chinese authorities have arrested and put on trial several people for assisting North Korean refugees?

Given that the Chinese authorities are denying the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) access to the North Korean refugees, and in doing so are violating the UNHCR-China bilateral treaty and breaking international law, what pressure will the Commission bring on the Chinese authorities to put an end to forced repatriation and respect the terms of the treaty?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(29 January 2003)

(29 January 2003)

The Commission is aware of the situation of North Korean Refugees in China and shares the Honourable Member's concern.

The Union has raised the issue on every possible occasion both with the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK) and China. In particular within the framework of the bilateral Union-China dialogue on human rights, the Union has urged China to respect international humanitarian norms and to grant access to the Office of the High Commissioner for Refugees to assess the situation of North Koreans in the border area.

Furthermore, the Union called on China to refrain from repatriating North Koreans until satisfactory assurances could be obtained from North Korean authorities that punishments had ceased. The treatment of North Korean refugees in China and the Union's corresponding demands have been reiterated during the last session of the Union-China bilateral Human Rights dialogue held 13/14 November 2002 in Beijing.

The Commission will continue to monitor the situation of refugees from North Korea with particular attention and raise the issue in its contacts with the DPRK and the Chinese authorities.

---