alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Ralph M. Amato, Chief Executive Officer of BoysToys.com, Inc. (the "registrant"), do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:

(1) the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), to which this Statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|Dated:  November 11, 2004 | By:  /s/ Ralph M. Amato         Ralph M. Amato
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2005-21872; Airspace Docket No. 05-ACE-26] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; request for comments; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action corrects a direct final rule; request for comments that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Friday, July 29, 2005, (70 FR 43745) [FR Doc. 05-21872].                    

# DATES:

This direct final rule is effective on 0901 UTC, October 27, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone (816) 329-2524.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## History

**Federal Register**                     Document 05-21872, published on Friday, July 29, 2005, (70 FR 43745) modified Class E Airspace at Norfolk, NE. The name of the airport is misspelled in the legal description of the Class E5 Airspace Area. This action corrects that error.                

                        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the error in the legal description of the Class E5 Airspace Area at Norfolk, NE, as published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Friday, July 29, 2005, (70 FR 43745) [FR Doc. 05-21872] is corrected as follows:                    

# PART 71—[AMENDED]

§ 71.1

                        On page 43746, Column 3, following ACE NE E5 Norfolk, NE, Replace the                               ( print page 53919)                            word “Stephan” with the word “Stefan” in the airport name. In the third line of the following legal description replace the word “Stephan” with the word “Stefan” in the airport name.                    

Dated: Issued in Kansas City, MO, on September 2, 2005.

Elizabeth S. Wallis,

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.

[FR Doc. 05-18158  Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
STATE v. Eugene Tyrone MILLER.

No. 453P02-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Eugene Tyrone Miller, for Miller, Eugene Tyrone.

Mary Carla Babb, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of July 2015 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                           2,019
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,176
<INVENTORY>                                     37,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,240
<PP&E>                                          35,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,806
<BONDS>                                         25,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,273
<SALES>                                         72,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,174
<CGS>                                           46,048
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,145
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,335
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,642
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>
#### Tamara Clark, Appellant, v Kenneth F. Perry, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 641]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered August 31, 2004 in a personal injury action. The order, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the complaint, as amplified by the bill of particulars, with respect to the permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member and significant limitation of use of a body function or system categories of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries she allegedly sustained when her stopped vehicle was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by defendant. We agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint to the extent that the complaint, as amplified by the *1379bill of particulars, alleges that plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of two categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), i.e., a permanent consequential limitation of use and a significant limitation of use. We therefore modify the order accordingly.

Defendant met his initial burden with respect to the two categories of serious injury at issue by submitting, inter alia, the report of defendant’s examining physician, who stated therein that plaintiff sustained only a mild injury that was healing and that no bulging discs appeared in the diagnostic images of plaintiff’s spine *(see Constantine v Serafín,*16 AD3d 1145 [2005]; *McCreesh v Hoehn,*307 AD2d 638 [2003]). We conclude, however, that plaintiff raised triable issues of fact with respect to the two categories of serious injury at issue by submitting the affidavit of her treating physician. Her treating physician stated therein that the diagnostic images showed bulging discs in plaintiff’s spine, and he further stated that plaintiff had a 50% decrease in her range of motion in two areas of her spine and that those injuries were permanent *(see Vitez v Shelton,*6 AD3d 1180, 1181-1182 [2004]; *Vucic v Rodriguez,*2 AD3d 437, 438 [2003]; *Parkhill v Cleary,*305 AD2d 1088, 1089 [2003]).

We note that plaintiff does not contend in her brief on appeal that the court erred in denying her cross motion for partial summary judgment on liability and thus is deemed to have abandoned her appeal with respect thereto *(see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora,*202 AD2d 984 [1994]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-56987) pertaining to the 1997 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan and
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Province Healthcare Company of our report
dated February 22, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Province Healthcare Company included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.



                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Nashville, Tennessee
March 2, 2000
STATE v. Juan Carlos RODRIGUEZ.

No. 302A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 31, 2015.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, John F. Carella, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Rodriguez, Juan Carlos.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Jennifer Martin, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Patrick B. Weede, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Michael Silver, Assistant District Attorney, for State of N.C.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st of July 2015 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 31st of July 2015."
BYNUM v. PROGRESSIVE INS. GROUP, INC., et al.

No. 338P14-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Waddell Bynum, Charlotte, for Bynum, Waddell.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of September 2015 by Plaintiff to Appeal:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
IN RE L.E.L.

No. COA08-1055.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 20, 2009.

Certification Date February 9, 2009.

Appeal from Jackson (07JT57, 07JT58).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# CE2004078EN.01043101.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/431 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/431

---

(2004/C 78 E/0452)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2794/03

by Eija-Riitta Korhola (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(19 September 2003)

Subject:   Publication of the EU's Kyoto target as a five-year moving average

Subject:

The Kyoto Protocol stipulates that compliance with commitments is to be gauged according to the average for the years from 2008 to 2012. This is reasonable because weather conditions, for example, can have a great impact on annual emissions, linked among other things to the small quantities of hydroelectric power generated in dry years. The developments as regards achievement of the Kyoto target by the EU and its Member States have recently been the subject of conflicting assessments stemming in part from weather conditions, as mentioned above. The press, to say nothing of the public at large, cannot understand such fluctuations or ascertain whether the trend after smoothing is encouraging or gloomy.

Has the Commission thought of changing its reporting by publishing, in addition to the annual statistics, an indication of the distance to target, calculated from a five-year moving average? Does it think that this would put the public in a better position to understand the real direction in which developments were moving, viewed over a time span longer than a year?

---
<PAGE>


                      RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL MATURO, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, TREASURER AND CHIEF
 FINANCIAL OFFICER OF RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP., THE SOLE GENERAL PARTNER
    OF THE REGISTRANT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
                             THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the sole general partner of the
Registrant (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
             period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
             requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
             Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


Dated: August 8, 2005
                                          By /s/ Michael Maturo
                                             -----------------------------------
                                          Michael Maturo,
                                          Executive Vice President, Treasurer
                                          and Chief Financial Officer of Reckson
                                          Associates Realty Corp., the sole
                                          general partner of the Registrant


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reckson Operating Partnership, L. P. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2023252EN.01001401.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Potsdam (Germany) lodged on 7 March 2023 — Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte (GEMA) v GL

(Case C-135/23, GEMA)

(2023/C 252/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Potsdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte e.V. (GEMA)

Defendant: GL

Question referred

Is there a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC (1) when the operator of an apartment building provides televisions in that apartment building which each receive broadcasts via an indoor antenna without a central reception for transmitting the signals?

---

(1)  Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10).

---
# Commission Implementing Decision of 25 June 2014 postponing the expiry date of approval of difethialone and difenacoum for            use in biocidal products for product-type 14 (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/397/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 25 June 2014

# postponing the expiry date of approval of difethialone and difenacoum for use in biocidal products for product-type 14

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2014/397/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1379 of 25 July 2017 renewing the approval of difenacoum as an active substance                                 for use in biocidal products of product-type 14 (Text with EEA relevance. ).
#### Warner Licensing Company, Inc., Respondent, v Kitty Fan Koo et al., Appellants.

[800 NYS2d 506]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered December 17, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing this breach-of-contract action, since disputed issues of fact exist as to whether, under the particular circumstances of this case, the subject licensing agreement gave rise to an implied obligation on plaintiff’s part to make reasonable efforts to generate profits from the trademark licensed to it by the corporate defendant *(cf. Wood v Duff-Gordon,*222 NY 88 [1917]). The motion court also correctly denied the motion insofar as it sought summary dismissal of the complaint as against the individual defendant, without prejudice to renewal after depositions. Viewing the complaint liberally and in the light most favorable to plaintiff, a claim for piercing the corporate veil, so as to reach the individual defendant, is stated within the four corners of the complaint *(see Clark Constr. Corp. v BLF Realty Holding Corp.,*300 AD2d 49 [2002]; *29/35 Realty Assoc. v 35th St. N.Y. Yarn Ctr.,*181 AD2d 540 [1992]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
IN RE N.R.

No. COA08-114.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 17, 2008.

Certification Date July 7, 2008.

Appeal from Harnett (06J214, 06J215).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.
# CE2004078EN.01019001.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/190 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/190

---

(2004/C 78 E/0196)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2924/03

by Salvador Garriga Polledo (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(6 October 2003)

Subject:   European Council to guarantee energy supplies

Subject:

Summer 2003 will be remembered, inter alia, for the number of electricity black-outs which left various international communities deprived of the energy supplies, that public authorities should guarantee their citizens.

The fact that one of those communities was London, the capital of the UK, has led analysts to wonder whether the EU needs a European Consultative Council for guaranteeing energy supplies, in all forms, so that the distress occasioned by this summer's blackouts does not spread to other parts of the Community.

Does the Commission believe that it should set up a consultative council for secure energy supplies, with a view to protecting the whole EU from black-outs?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(13 November 2003)

(13 November 2003)

No electricity system can be 100 % immune from interruptions. Having said that, a repeat of the large number of incidents during 2003 on a regular basis would be unacceptable to European citizens.

Generally, the Commission believes that it is the task of Member States to ensure the continuity of electricity supplies. This applies both to generation adequacy (sufficient generation capacity to meet the consumption at any time) and to network adequacy (sufficient transmission and distribution network capacity to serve the loads at any time).

However, as the electricity transmission of the whole Europe is interconnected, there is a need for a close co-operation between the system operators. To this end, the Union of Co-ordination of Transmission of Electricity (UCTE) at the request of the ‘Florence’ Electricity Regulation Forum, has initiated the work on the Operational Handbook which aims at binding security and reliability rules in the UCTE network.

This work serves mainly to consolidate existing agreements between system operators which have been in place for a number of years. The Commission, European regulators, the transmission system operator (TSOs) outside the UCTE area and other stakeholders have also participated in this work. The Regulation on cross-border trade of electricity provides for the possibility to include, in the guidelines on congestion management, common rules on minimum safety and operational standards for the use and operation of the network. It is the intention of the Commission that the future guidelines will include basic rules of this type in support of the development of the Handbook.

It is also considered important that the regulatory framework in place ensures adequate investments to the electricity generation and transmission infrastructure in medium and long term. The Commission intends to produce a Communication on this subject by the end of 2003, which will contain some specific proposals on this subject.

---
STATE v. Marvin Wade MILLSAPS.

No. 374P13-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Barry H. Bloch, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Marvin W. Millsaps, Norlina, for Millsaps, Marvin Wade.

Sarah Kirkman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th of July 2015 by Defendant for Appellate Review:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
# CE2004088EN.01042001.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/420 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/420

---

(2004/C 88 E/0427)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2590/03

by Claude Moraes (PSE) to the Commission

(4 August 2003)

Subject:   Situation in Liberia

Subject:

What is the EU's involvement in relation to the current situation in Liberia in terms of representations from the Commission or the EU's CFSP High Representative Javier Solana?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(9 September 2003)

(9 September 2003)

The main objective of the Union's approach to the region is to contribute strategically to peace, security and stability. To this end, the Union participates in the International Contact Group for Liberia (ICGL) through the Special Representative of the Presidency for the Mano River Union, Mr Dahlgren as well as the Commission.

The Presidency and the Commission participate at the Ecowas led peace talks for Liberia in Accra as observers. Further political support to the talks is provided by the Union declarations of 13 June 2003, 23 June 2003, 21 July 2003 and 28 July 2003. The Community contributes financially to the talks in the amount of EUR 390 000 and a request for further financing is under consideration. The Commission is exploring the legal and financial possibilities to contribute to the peace process. In the light of a fact finding mission to Accra and Abuja (1 to 8 August 2003) the Commission proposed urgent support to some components of the Ecowas peace mission in Liberia by re-programming the European Development Fund (EDF) financing for Liberia, following the procedure of Article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement. A financing proposal is currently under preparation. Finally, the Commission's Humanitarian Office provides humanitarian relief in the form of health, nutrition, protection and water and sanitation projects in Liberia.

---