alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, Program Project—Prenatal Events-Postnatal Consequences.                    

*Dates:*                         February 25, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rm 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone conference call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rita Anand, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd. Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 496-1487,                         *anandr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 25, 2005.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-1827  Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 10.63

                              August 5, 1997


Mr. Tim W. Nagle
13307 Tosca
Houston, Texas  77079

Re:  STOCK  OPTION AGREEMENT DATED AS OF APRIL 24, 1997 BETWEEN TIM W.  NAGLE
     AND READING & BATES CORPORATION - OPTIONS WITH RESPECT TO 120,000 SHARES
     OF THE COMMON STOCK OF READING & BATES CORPORATION

Dear Tim:

Reading  &  Bates  Corporation  (the  "Company")  requests  you  agree  to  a
rescission  of  the  stock options awarded pursuant to  the  above-referenced
agreement, subject to:  (a) completion of the transaction described  in  that
Agreement  and  Plan of Merger dated as of July 10, 1997 among,  inter  alia,
Falcon  Drilling  Company, Inc. and the Company and  (b)  such  merger  being
accounted  for  on  a "pooling of interests" basis.  If the  transaction,  as
described in such agreement, is not completed or is completed thereunder  and
accounted  for on any basis other than a "pooling of interests", the  Company
agrees  such rescission shall be of no legal effect, and the above-referenced
stock options and award agreement shall be restored to full force and effect,
as if this letter agreement had never existed.

If  the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement in the
space provided below, and return one fully executed copy of this letter to us
for our files.

                              Very truly yours,

                              READING & BATES CORPORATION

                              By:
                                   Paul B. Loyd, Jr.

                              Its: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Agreed this        day of August, 1997.


Mr. Tim W. Nagle
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Neil Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Date: September 21, 2005

/s/ Neil Christiansen

Neil Christiansen

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. CLARK.

No. COA08-752.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Cumberland (07CRS5856).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Order filed October 15, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00547

- CR

____________ HORACE SIMPSON , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No 11

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. 1789057



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit 5 , a VHS
Station Video

.The clerk of the Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No 11 is directed to deliver

to the Clerk of this court the original of State's Exhibit 5, on or before October 24,
2014

. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of ins pection, to return the original of State's Exhibit 5, to the
clerk of the Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No 11.

PER CURIAM
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,969

EX PARTE JESUS ORDAZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 06-220-K26A IN THE 26 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of money laundering

and sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Ordaz v. State, No. 03-07-00039-CR (Tex. App. – Austin, October 10, 2007). 

Applicant contends that he was denied the opportunity to petition this Court for discretionary

review, because counsel prepared and filed a petition for discretionary review in the wrong court.

Applicant’s direct appeal was decided on October 10, 2007. He obtained one extension of time to
file his petition for discretionary review, which extended the deadline until December 10, 2007.

Applicant’s petition for discretionary review was filed directly in this Court on December 10, 2007,

rather than in the court of appeals as required by Rule 68.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Applicant’s appellate counsel was sent a notification of the error on December 10, 2007.

The petition for discretionary review was re-filed in the court of appeals on December 14, 2007, and

was received and filed in this Court on January 22, 2008. On January 23, 2008, this Court dismissed

the petition as untimely filed. 

Appellate counsel’s paralegal filed an affidavit in which she confirms that she transmitted

the petition for discretionary review to this Court on December 7, 2007, and that the petition was

returned to counsel’s office on December 10, 2007. By that time, the deadline for filing the petition

in the proper court had passed. Applicant’s appellate counsel has not submitted an affidavit himself,

possibly because he filed this writ of habeas corpus on Applicant’s behalf.

The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, recommending that relief

be denied because a defendant does not have a constitutional right to file a petition for discretionary

review.. However, this Court has held that where a defendant is denied the opportunity to petition

this Court for discretionary review because of appellate counsel’s ineffectiveness, the defendant is

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review. See Ex parte

Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). This is such a case.

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Third Court of Appeals in Cause No. 03-07-00039-

CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 06-220-K26A from the 26th Judicial District Court

of Williamson County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionaryreview with the Third Court

of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.
Delivered: August 20, 2008

Do not publish
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 676 

To provide that the Executive Director of the Inter-American Development 

Bank or the Alternate Executive Director of the Inter-American Development Bank may serve on the Board of Directors of the Inter-American 

Foundation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2007 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself and Mr. LUGAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To provide that the Executive Director of the Inter-American 

Development Bank or the Alternate Executive Director 

of the Inter-American Development Bank may serve on 

the Board of Directors of the Inter-American Foundation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 676 IS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO APPOINT EXECUTIVE DIREC2 TOR OR ALTERNATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 

3 OF THE INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT 

4 BANK TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE 

5 INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION. 

6 The third sentence of section 401(g) of the Foreign 

7 Assistance Act of 1969 (22 U.S.C. 290f(g)) is amended 

8 to read as follows: ‘‘Three members of the Board shall 

9 be appointed from among the following: officers or employ10 ees of agencies of the United States concerned with inter11 American affairs, the United States Executive Director of 

12 the Inter-American Development Bank, or the Alternate 

13 Executive Director of the Inter-American Development 

14 Bank.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# 151

2 ‘. . ..- __........._.-.-...---_ 2 ^^.._-_.._- .-. ___.__Y_ 2.. ,..“.,“..L *-..’ . ..I^ &“A,. .T.#.;“.““.“.... n- -.I= l.....T. Y.

# e - . 1 . IS2

. .
DEPT. OF CORRECTION v. MEDICAL BOARD.

No. 51PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Joseph Finarelli, Assistant Attorney General, for Dept. of Correction, et al.

Thomas W. Mansfield, Brian L. Blankenship, D. Todd Brosius, for Medical Board.

Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Wallace C. Hollowell, III, Raleigh, for American Medical Asso.

Timothy C. Miller, J.D., Senior Director, for FSMB.

Sarah L. Buthe, Raleigh, Carl J. Chiappa, New York, NY, Logan M. Breed, Washington, DC, Aaron C. Mahler, for Physicians for Human Rights.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of August 2008 by Plaintiffs for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiffs (Dept. of Correction, et al.) shall have up to and including the 29th day of September 2008 to file and serve their brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."
IN RE K.P.W.

No. COA08-1028.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 3, 2009.

Certification Date March 23, 2009.

Appeal from Rutherford (07JT76, 07JT77).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. WINCHESTER.

No. COA08-595.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 3, 2009.

Certification Date February 23, 2009.

Appeal from Rockingham (05CRS7121).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2014 of 27 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2014                     

# of 27 August 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
**Certification      Pursuant to **

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350, **

**as      Adopted Pursuant to **

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

*sociedad      anónima *
*bursatil      *
*de      capital variable *

|  | 1. | The accompanying                Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,                2007                (the “Report”)                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | Information contained                in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial                condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Cristóbal                Mondragón Fragoso |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Cristóbal                Mondragón Fragoso    |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer                  |

| By:    | /s/Daniel                Salazar Ferrer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel                Salazar Ferrer    |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer  |

----
ACTON v. LOWES.

No. COA07-1436.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 2, 2008.

Certification Date September 22, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 217415, I.C. NO. 916514).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                   <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 SEP-30-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                              5,840,646 
<SECURITIES>                                0 
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,732,118 
<ALLOWANCES>                           80,500 
<INVENTORY>                         6,232,223 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   13,906,410 
<PP&E>                                433,037 
<DEPRECIATION>                        248,627 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     14,149,386 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               5,496,838 
<BONDS>                                     0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0 
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                               44,653
<OTHER-SE>                          8,607,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       14,149,386
<SALES>                            12,852,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   12,852,113
<CGS>                               9,895,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       2,253,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        5,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       819,437
<INCOME-TAX>                          185,927
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   633,510
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          633,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         $  0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                         $  0.14
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GameTech International, Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John B. Furman, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John B. FurmanJohn B. FurmanChief Executive OfficerFebruary 14, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 1999 PALADYNE
CORPORATION, INC. FORM 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      426
<ALLOWANCES>                                        47
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   426
<PP&E>                                             429
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (301)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                         414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       677
<SALES>                                           4366
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4366
<CGS>                                             3473
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    805
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                805
<DISCONTINUED>                                     605
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1410
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)



</TABLE>