alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In re D.L.W., D.L.N.W., V.A.W.

No. 252PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 9, 2015.

Jeffrey William Gillette, for Wade, Marisha Nicole.

Jamie L. Hamlett, for Alamance County DSS.

Derrick J. Hensley, for D.L.W., et al.

Dammien Worth, for Worth, Dammien Lamar.

Kathleen Arundell Jackson, Charlotte, for N.C. Association of Department of Social Services Attorneys.

Rachael J. Hawes, for N.C. Association of Department of Social Services Attorneys.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of December 2015 by NC Association of Department of Social Services Attorneys for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of December 2015."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
In the Matter of P.R., H.R. Appealed by Mother.

No. 178P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Peter Wood, Paul Ennis, Chapel Hill, for Mother.

Carolyn Holcomb, Chapel Hill, for Orange County DSS.

Pamela Newell Williams, for Guardian ad Litem.

Carlos Rodriquez Jimenez, Pro Se.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th day of April 2008 by Respondent (Mother) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*126"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
# C_2023071EN.01003801.xml

| 27.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/38

---

Action brought on 5 January 2023 — Romagnoli Fratelli v CPVO

(Case T-2/23)

(2023/C 71/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Romagnoli Fratelli SpA (Bologna, Italy) (represented by: E. Truffo and A. Iurato, lawyers)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

Details of the proceedings before CPVO

Community Plant Variety at issue: Variety Melrose — Community Plant Variety Right No EU 31618

Contested decision: Restitutio in Integrum Decision of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of 7th November 2022 in file No 2009/240

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order CPVO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order CPVO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Force majeure and hardship due to the Covid-19 pandemic; |
| --- | --- |

—

Force majeure and hardship due to the Covid-19 pandemic;

| — | Excusable error; |
| --- | --- |

—

Excusable error;

| — | Missed or inaccurate interpretation of evidence; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Missed or inaccurate interpretation of evidence; and

| — | Infringement of Article 65 of Commission Regulation (EC) 874/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 65 of Commission Regulation (EC) 874/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Othnet, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated: March 15, 2004              By: /s/ Jeffrey Wattenberg
                                   Jeffrey Wattenberg,
                                   President and Chief Executive
                                   Officer

Dated: March 15, 2004              By: /s/ Jeffrey Wattenberg
                                   Jeffrey Wattenberg,
                                   Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          25,251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,555
<INVENTORY>                                     34,907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,607
<PP&E>                                          75,730
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 861,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,160
<BONDS>                                        607,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       197,028
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   861,845
<SALES>                                        325,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               325,620
<CGS>                                          270,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  270,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   231
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,419
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Reginald U. FULLARD.

No. 43P15-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of July 2015 by Defendant to Appeal:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
Exhibit








Exhibit 10(l)(iii)


THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE McDONALD’S CORPORATION
SEVERANCE PLAN
The McDonald’s Corporation Severance Plan, as most recently amended and restated effective September 30, 2015 and as subsequently amended by the First and Second Amendments, is hereby further amended as set forth below, effective as of July 15, 2016:
I.


Article III-A is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph to the end thereof:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, McDonald’s Corporation may, at the direction of McDonald’s Corporation Corporate Executive Vice President - Chief People Officer and Corporate Executive Vice President - CFO, implement one or more supplemental Special Voluntary Separation Window benefit programs covering such Employees of McDonald’s as determined by McDonald’s Corporation in its sole discretion.  Such Special Voluntary Separation Window benefit programs shall be subject to terms and conditions that are substantially similar to the terms and conditions set forth in this Article III-A except for terms and conditions relating to the timing of elections, notifications and Separations from Service; provided, however, that any such supplemental Special Voluntary Separation Window program must expire and each Eligible Employee who elects to terminate employment under any such supplemental Special Voluntary Separation Window program must Separate from Service no later than February 10, 2017.
II.


Except as herein amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
# CE2004065EN.01001502.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/15

---

(2004/C 65 E/016)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3539/02

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(11 December 2002)

Subject:   Preferential-priced medicines illegally reimported into the EU

Subject:

Is the Commission aware that significant quantities of not-for-profit medicines destined for African countries are being illegally reimported back to the EU for sale at a higher price? If so, what measures are in place to ensure that current customs controls at EU borders are being effectively implemented, and does the Commission intend to introduce further additional measures to address this growing problem?

Answer given by Mr Lamy on behalf of the Commission

(17 January 2003)

(17 January 2003)

The Commission is indeed aware of the problem of low priced medicines destined for developing country markets that are being imported into the Community.

Importation of medicines coming from third countries into a Member State is subject to the holding of an authorisation as laid down in Directive 2001/83/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (1).

1

Action against unauthorised importation of low priced medicines is currently only possible for products protected by intellectual property rights. If goods covered by either trademark or patent protection on a Community market are appearing without permission of the right holder, he/she may take action in the national courts against the importer and ensure that the goods are removed from circulation.

The Commission has in the context of the Community Programme for action on communicable diseases and poverty reduction proposed a Council Regulation (2), adopted by the Commission on 30 October 2002, to prevent tiered priced medicines sold to developing countries from entering the Community market. This Regulation, once in force, will enable the customs authorities to detain goods suspected to be tiered priced medicines (whether covered by intellectual property protection or not) at the Community borders until the national authorities issue a decision on the character of the merchandise and the use that can be given to these goods.

2

The Commission firmly believes that improved means to prevent import of low priced pharmaceuticals to be traded on Community markets, as outlined above, will encourage the pharmaceutical industry and exporters to supply sufficient volumes of essential medicines to poor countries at affordable prices.

---

(1)  OJ L 311, 28.11.2001.

1

(2)  COM(2002) 592 final.

2

---
|CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|1)                                                                     
|                                                                       
|2)                                                                     
|                                                                       
|3)                                                                     
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|By:/s/ Ralph M. Amato
Ralph M. Amato
Chief Executive Officer & Chairman



- 25 -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------





|CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL OFFICER                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|                                                           
|                                                           
|                                                           
|4)                                                         
|                                                           
|5)                                                         
|                                                           
|6)                                                         
|                                                           
|                                                           
|By:/s/ Ralph M. AmatoRalph M. Amato
Chief Financial Officer



- 26 -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 174 (Friday, September 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53684-53685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Fire Management Plan, Final Environmental Impact Statement, 
Chiricahua National Monument, AZ

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision on the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Fire Management Plan, Chiricahua 
National Monument.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Sec.  102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969, 83 Stat. 852, 853, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. 
4332(2)(C), the

[[Page 53685]]

National Park Service announces the availability of the Record of 
Decision for the Fire Management Plan, Chiricahua National Monument, 
Arizona. On August 2, 2005 the Director, Intermountain Region approved 
the Record of Decision for the project. As soon as practicable, the 
National Park Service will begin to implement the Preferred Alternative 
contained in the FEIS issued on July 1, 2005. The following course of 
action will occur under the preferred alternative, the Watershed 
Alternative. This course of action and 2 alternatives were analyzed in 
the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements. The full range of 
foreseeable environmental consequences was assessed, and appropriate 
mitigating measures were identified.
    The Record of Decision includes a statement of the decision made, 
synopses of other alternatives considered, the basis for the decision, 
a description of the environmentally preferable alternative, a finding 
on impairment of park resources and values, a listing of measures to 
minimize environmental harm, and an overview of public involvement in 
the decision-making process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Dennett, 13063 E. Bonita Canyon 
Road, Willcox, AZ 85643, (520) 824-3560 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c3f1d0e0e151923381912121908083c120c0f521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0b39182829995afb4959e9e958484b09e8083de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the Record of Decision may be 
obtained from the contact listed above or online at http://www.nps.gov/CHIR.

    Dated: August 2, 2005.
Kate Cannon,
Acting Deputy, Intermountain Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 05-17852 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Lake Victoria Mining Company, Inc.: Exhibit 10.17 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






ADDENDUM TO MINERAL PROPERTIES SALE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

        IN RESPECT OF PRIMARY LICENCES
No.
        __________,
____________, ___________, ___________and _____________

WHEREAS Director with Company (the Purchaser) and
____________ in Partnership with ____________________________(“the owner”)
entered into mineral properties sale and purchase agreement on the 21st
day of May, 2009 in respect of the above mentioned Primary Mining Licence
(“the Agreement”). 

WHEREAS under clause 2.1.5 of the agreement the parties
have agreed that the purchaser has options for a final buy out as follows: 

Tshs ________________or the pro- rata portion of two percent
(2%) of the Net Smelter Production, at the option of the Purchaser, for each PML
listed on Schedule A that the Purchaser desires to finalise the purchase option
of such Final Buy out Payment to be paid on or before 730days made in 2.1.2,
2.1.3 and 2.1.4 herein.

NOWTHEREFORE, the parties have agreed to add into the
content of said clause 2.1.5 of the said agreement as follows:

Addition of a sentence...or 2% of the Net Sale Value immediately
after the words 2% Net Smelter production.

Also, the Purchaser may return licenses in the event no viable
discovery is made, within 540 days from the date of secondary payment. In the
circumstance, the purchaser shall not be liable to the final buy out.

Signed and Delivered on the date first appearing
hereinabove by the duly authorized representatives of:




DIRECTOR WITH COMPANY

By    :    Purchaser

Title :    ________________________________

Date :    ________________________________

________________________

By    :  
_______________________________

Title :  
_______________________________

Date :  
_______________________________

________________________

By    :  
_______________________________

Title :  
_______________________________

Date :  
_______________________________

_______________________

By    :  
_______________________________

Title :  
_______________________________

Date :  
_______________________________
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**RECKSONOPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.**

 

**Certificationof Marc Holliday, President of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole generalpartner of the Registrant, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code**

 

I, Marc Holliday,President of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole general partner of RecksonOperating Partnership, L. P. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1)         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Companyfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2)         The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|  Dated:  August 13, 2009 | By     | /s/  MARC HOLLIDAY                                |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   |  Marc  Holliday                              |
|                                    |   |  President                                   |
|                                    |   |  of  Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC,             |
|                                    |   |  the  sole general partner of the Registrant |

 

----
# CE2004070EN.01003601.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/36

---

(2004/C 70 E/040)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1255/03

by Hanja Maij-Weggen (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(3 April 2003)

Subject:   Human rights in Vietnam

Subject:

Is the Commission aware of the list of political prisoners in Vietnam drawn up by the Liberty Flame Foundation?

Is the Commission aware of the oppression of political dissidents by the Vietnamese Communist Party in Hanoi and, in particular, the recent arrest and imprisonment of young dissidents who have criticised the party on the Internet, for example the attorney Le Chi Quang, the journalist Nguyen Vu Binh and Dr Pham Hong Son, and dissidents who founded the Democratic Party, such as former colonel Pham Que Duong, Tran Khue, the journalist Ho Thu and the writer Tran Dung Tien?

Is the Commission prepared to take action to promote freedom of opinion and democracy in Vietnam?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(8 May 2003)

(8 May 2003)

The Commission would like to confirm to the Honourable Member that it is well aware of the list of prisoners of conscience established by the Liberty Flame Foundation and of the individual cases referred to in the question.

The Commission's policy towards Vietnam is to encourage and support continued progress on human rights and democratisation, and to raise concerns where abuses occur or were a deterioration in the situation becomes evident. The Commission works closely with the Member States in monitoring human rights developments in the country and participates in all Union démarches to the Government of Vietnam on human rights issues, including those pertaining to the situation of Persons of Concern.

The Commission shares the concerns expressed by the United Nations Human Rights Committee regarding the shortcomings of the implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in Vietnam. Extensive limitations on the right of freedom of expression in the media have been reported which are worrying and incompatible with Article 19 of the Covenant. The Commission regrets that the situation seems to have worsened during 2002. Moreover, the absence of specific legislation on political parties and the fact that only the Communist Party is permitted remains of concern.

The Union, Commission and Member States, have repeatedly urged the Government of Vietnam to strengthen its respect for political and religious freedoms, to further strengthen economic and social freedoms and to create a legal framework for a supportive environment to allow the development of a strengthened civil society, from which Vietnam would greatly benefit. Commission and Member states have expressed these requests in their joint declaration at the Consultative Group meeting in Hanoi in December 2002.

The Commission will continue to follow closely the human rights situation in Vietnam, together with the Diplomatic Missions of the Member States in Vietnam, and take appropriate action.

---
----

(2004/C 65 E/200)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2643/03

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(10 September 2003)

Subject:   Sinking of the Danish cargo ship ‘Karin Cat’ caused by a shift of the cargo

Answer given by Ms de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(14 October 2003)

The Commission has not received any specific information concerning the sinking of the Danish cargo ship ‘Karin Cat’ on 18 February 2003.

Furthermore, it is not for the Commission to comment on the conclusions of the post-accident technical investigation conducted by the Danish authorities. This type of investigation is a matter for the national authorities responsible for determining the exact circumstances of accidents, in order where necessary to formulate proposals for amending the regulations.

In this regard, Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (1) stipulates that one of the tasks of that body is to facilitate cooperation between the Member States in the development of a common methodology for investigating accidents and to support national authorities responsible for serious accident investigations.

----

(1)OJ L 208, 5.8.2002.

----