alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-07-00428-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

RICHARD RAMIREZ CASTILLO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 275th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Richard Ramirez Castillo, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion

to dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having
2

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 21st day of August, 2008.
IN RE B.A.N.T.

No. COA08-1167.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Durham (06J58).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.24.1


                  Schedule of Omitted documents in the Form of
                   Exhibit 10.24, Including Material Detail in
                 Which Such Documents Differ From Exhibit 10.24

                   ------------------------------------------


                 Indemnification Agreement, dated August 29, 2001, between the
Registrant and David O. Lindner.

                 Indemnification Agreement, dated August 29, 2001, between the
Registrant and Anthony J. Kirincic.

                 Indemnification Agreement, dated August 29, 2001, between the
Registrant and Barry Shapiro.

                 Indemnification Agreement, dated August 29, 2001, between the
Registrant and Harold Paul.



                  The form of the document listed above does not differ in
material detail from the form of Exhibit 10.24, except with respect to the
identity of the indemnitee and the address for notices in Section 21.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134888 & (48) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. TERRY R. BAKER, d/b/a Stephen J. Markman, KATER ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134888 COA: 265994 Ingham CC: 04-001196-CH HBI, Defendant,

and

GREWAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to strike the plaintiff’s brief is DENIED.

p1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
# The South Sudan (European Union Financial Sanctions) Regulations 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

Statutory Instruments

# 2014 No. 1827

Criminal Law

# The South Sudan (European Union Financial Sanctions) Regulations 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

*at 1.30 p.m.* on 11th July 2014                        

Laid before Parliament

*at 2.30 p.m.* on 11th July 2014                        

Coming into force

*at 3.30 p.m.* on 11th July 2014                        

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (with effect in accordance with reg. 1 of the amending S.I.) by The South Sudan (European Union Financial Sanctions) (No. 2) Regulations 2015 (S.I. 2015/1361), **reg. 18** (with regs. 17, 19)
TUNSTALL v. Frank W. BALLANCE, et al.

No. 323A92-10.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Lumberton, for Tunstall, Charles Alonzo.

Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th of August 2015 by Petitioner to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 178 (Thursday, September 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending August 26, 
2005

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: OST-2005-22204.
    Date Filed: August 22, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

Mail Vote 452--Resolution 010s;
TC3 Japan, Korea-South East Asia;
Special Passenger Amending Resolution between China (excluding Hong 
Kong SAR and Macao SAR) and Japan.
Intended effective date: 1 September 2005.

    Docket Number: OST-2005-22205.
    Date Filed: August 22, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

Composite Expedited Resolution 002ad (Memo 1260);
Composite Expedited Resolution 024e (Memo 1261);
Composite Expedited Resolutions 017b and 017c (Memo 1262).
Intended effective date: 1 October 2005.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 05-18332 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
DARBY v. CAMPBELL, et al.

No. 171P15-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Arthur Donald Darby, Jr., Fayetteville, for Darby, Arthur Donald (Jr.).

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of September 2015 by Plaintiff For Error Coram Nobis:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          64,463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  426,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                    42,275
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               456,165
<PP&E>                                         277,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                (48,063)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,250,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          995,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       178,734
<OTHER-SE>                                    (89,028)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,250,128
<SALES>                                        811,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               811,077
<CGS>                                          468,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  828,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,481)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
Janet L. YOUNG v. Howard L. GUM, Gum & Hillier, P.A., and Donna Cooper.

No. 494P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 13, 2008.

William E. Loose, Asheville, for Janet Young.

William A. Parker, Robert B. Long, Jr., Asheville, for Gum, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 23rd day of October 2007 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th day of May 2008."

MARTIN, J., recused.
1

The Honorable John E. Simko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District

of South Dakota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of

the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1034

___________

David L. Yocom, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Human Services Center, Doctors, * District of South Dakota.

Staff and Administrators, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: June 6, 2003

 Filed: June 9, 2003

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

David Yocom appeals from the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his civil action. Upon de novo review, we conclude that dismissal of

Yocom’s complaint, as time-barred, was proper for the reasons explained by the

district court.
-2-

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN Television
Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
Gary R. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, William A. Cunningham,
Vice President and Controller, Deborah R. Jacobson, Vice President of Corporate
Development and Treasurer, and Peter E. Maloney, Vice President of Finance,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                   |  |                                                                                                   
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 5, 2003 |  | /s/ Gary R. Chapman

Gary R. Chapman
Chief Executive Officer                                      
|                   |  |                                                                                                   
|                   |  |                                                                                                   
|Dated: May 5, 2003 |  | /s/ William A. Cunningham

William A. Cunningham
Vice President and Controller                    
|                   |  |                                                                                                   
|                   |  |                                                                                                   
|Dated: May 5, 2003 |  | /s/ Deborah R. Jacobson

Deborah R. Jacobson
Vice President of Corporate Development and Treasurer
|                   |  |                                                                                                   
|                   |  |                                                                                                   
|Dated: May 5, 2003 |  | /s/ Peter E. Maloney

Peter E. Maloney
Vice President of Finance
IN RE M.B.

No. COA08-932.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 20, 2009.

Certification Date February 9, 2009.

Appeal from Cumberland (06JT441).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,430
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,030
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,520
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,120)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,430
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (19,988)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,988)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.18

CONSENT OF SOPHIE BERGERON

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the
AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



| | 1. | The technical report dated April 5, 2011, entitled Cerro Negro Gold Project Santa Cruz Province, Argentina NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Cerro
Negro Report); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Cerro Negro Report and the Cerro Negro Project, and the
properties described therein.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information
contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-138760, 333-151243, 333-151251 and 333-174376 on Form S-8 of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2012



/s/ Sophie BergeronName:

Sophie Bergeron, eng.
STATE v. Chris Darryl DRYE.

No. 2P09-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of January 2009 by Defendant for Issuance of Certificate of Probable Cause for Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of February 2009."
#### 480 Associates, Inc., Respondent, v S.A. II, LLC, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 30]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered on or about April 18, 2005, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, directing specific performance of the subject contract for the sale of real property, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Although plaintiff real estate contract vendee was unprepared to close on the first scheduled closing date, time was not made of the essence in connection with that closing date and plaintiff subsequently indicated, and has shown, that it was ready, willing and able to close within the period specified in the contract and otherwise in accordance with the contract terms and that defendant was able to convey the property. Accordingly, it has demonstrated its entitlement to specific performance *(see Piga v*
      *815
      *Rubin,*300 AD2d 68 [2002], *lv dismissed in part and denied in part*99 NY2d 646 [2003]). Plaintiffs failure to close on the first scheduled date, even if prompted by motives of the sort defendant would attribute to plaintiff, does not rise to the level of “criminal, immoral or unconscionable conduct which would warrant the denial of the equitable remedy of specific performance” *(4200 Ave. K Realty Corp. v 4200 Realty Co.,*123 AD2d 419, 420 [1986]; *see also National Distillers & Chem. Corp. v Seyopp Corp.,*17 NY2d 12, 15 [1966]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
CHRISTOPH v. PENNELL.

No. COA08-505.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 3, 2009.

Certification Date March 23, 2009.

Appeal from Forsyth (07CVD2290).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
----

(2004/C 65 E/158)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2410/03

by Freddy Blak (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(21 July 2003)

Subject:   German road charge

According to the Danish newspaper Børsen of 10 July 2003 (front page), the Commission is considering initiating proceedings against Germany for introducing road charges as this will result in unequal terms of competition.

Can the Commission confirm this?

If so, will the Commission say what new circumstances have led it to consider this course of action?

I would refer back here to my Written Question No E-2684/02 (1), pointing out the competition-distorting nature of the German road charge, which the Commission, however, denies in its answer.

----

(1)OJ C 110 E, 8.5.2003, p. 89.

----
KIRBY, et al. v. NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 56PA14-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Oct. 7, 2015.

Matthew H. Bryant, Winston-Salem, Attorney at Law, for Kirby, Everette E., et al.

Dahr Joseph Tanoury, Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Department Of Transportation.

John F. Oates, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Department Of Transportation.

John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, for North Carolina Department Of Transportation.

T. Paul Hendrick, Winston-Salem, Attorney at Law, for Kirby, Everette E., et al.

Kenneth C. Otis, III, Winston-Salem, Attorney at Law, for Kirby, Everette E., et al.

Kenneth A. Shanklin, Wilmington, Attorney at Law, for Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.

Matthew A. Nichols, Attorney at Law, for Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of October 2015 by Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of October 2015."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
Dorothy Hagood CORNING v. Louis Avery CORNING, IV.

No. 128P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Michelle D. Connell, Raleigh, for Corning, Dorothy Hagood.

Carolyn T. Peacock, New Bern, for Corning, Louis Avery (IV).

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of April 2015 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 6th of April 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Craven County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
MEARES v. DANA CORPORATION, et al.

No. 502P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Margaret M. Kingston, Charlotte, for Dana Corporation, et al.

Vernon Sumwalt, Mark T. Sumwalt, Charlotte, for Meares.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of November 2008 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion for Stay Dissolved by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of February 2009."
STATE v. Leonard HARDY.

No. 260P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 27, 2015.

Hannah Love, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hardy, Leonard.

Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

C. Branson Vickery, III, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of July 2015 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of July 2015."
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Lee KING.

No. 229P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., for King, Christopher Lee.

June S. Ferrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Gary W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 7th of July 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of July 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."