alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Directors of
Sigma Coatings B.V.:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of PetroFina S.A. on Form F-3 (File No. 333-49315) of our report dated March 23,
1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of PetroFina S.A. for the year
ended December 31, 1999, relating to the balance sheet of Sigma Coatings B.V. as
of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related statements of income,
comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the two
years ended December 31, 1998.

KPMG Accountants N.V.

/s/  KPMG Accountants N.V.
---------------------------------------------------------
Ref: J.F.C. van Everdingen

July 3, 2000

                                       E-6
# C_2023286EN.01003502.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/35

---

Action brought on 17 June 2023 — Nehera and Others v EUIPO — Zdút (NEHERA)

(Case T-335/23)

(2023/C 286/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicants: Isabel Nehera (Sutton, Ontario, Canada), Natacha Sehnal (Montferrier-sur-Lez, France), Jean-Henri Nehera (Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada) (represented by: W. Woll, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ladislav Zdút (Bratislava, Slovakia)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark NEHERA — European Union trade mark No 12 812 319

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Forth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 April 2023 in Case R 1217/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and those incurred by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, including the necessary costs incurred in the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and those incurred by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, including the necessary costs incurred in the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal;

| — | order EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the applicants.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the right to a fair trial; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the right to a fair trial;

| — | Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of UST Private Equity Investors Fund, Inc. (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2002 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  September 13, 2002        /s/ David I. Fann
                                 ---------------------------------------
                                 Name: David I. Fann
                                 Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer


Date:  September 13, 2002        /s/ Douglas A. Lindgren
                                 ---------------------------------------
                                 Name: Douglas A. Lindgren
                                 Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer


Date:  September 13, 2002        /s/ Brian F. Schmidt
                                 ---------------------------------------
                                 Name: Brian F. Schmidt
                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
# Regulation (EU) No 252/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (repealed)Show full title

Regulation (EU) No 252/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 amending Council Regulation            (EC) No 774/94, as regards the implementing and delegated powers to be conferred on the Commission (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Regulation (EU) No 252/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council

# of 26 February 2014

# amending Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94, as regards the implementing and delegated powers to be conferred on the Commission                        (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Regulation (EU) 2015/754 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 opening and providing for the administration                                 of certain Union tariff quotas for high-quality beef, and for pigmeat, poultrymeat, wheat and meslin, and brans, sharps and                                 other residues.

U.K.

# Commission Statement on codification

U.K.

# Commission Statement on delegated acts
STATE v. TWEED.

No. COA07-740.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 20, 2008.

Certification Date June 9, 2008.

Appeal from Randolph (05CRS90).

Cases reported without published opinion. Reversed.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 984/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 984/2013 of 14 October 2013 establishing a Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms in            Gas Transmission Systems and supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text            with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 984/2013                     

# of 14 October 2013

# establishing a Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms in Gas Transmission Systems and supplementing Regulation (EC)                        No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council                     

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/459 of 16 March 2017 establishing a network code on capacity allocation mechanisms in gas                                 transmission systems and repealing Regulation (EU) No 984/2013 (Text with EEA relevance. ).
----

(2004/C 33 E/241)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2215/03

by Cristiana Muscardini (UEN) to the Commission

(2 July 2003)

Subject:   Recognition of the liberal professions

The usual procedures are under way for the adoption by Parliament of its opinion on the proposal for a directive on the recognition of professional qualifications (1). The proposal covers professions already regulated in the Member States and aims to encourage mutual recognition of qualifications in order to promote freedom of establishment. However, there are new professions, such as translators and interpreters, which are practised at both national and European level but have yet to secure recognition. It would be highly useful and appropriate to introduce a minimum level of regulation for these professions, notably with a view to protecting users.

The Commission:

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(4 September 2003)

As regards the recognition of professional qualifications, the professions of translator and interpreter are covered, depending on the level of training required, either by Directive 89/48/EEC (2) or by Directive 92/51/EEC (3). The Directives apply only when the profession concerned is regulated in the Member State in which the person wishes to exercise it and that person acquired his or her qualifications in another Member State. These Directives, the principles of which have been included in the proposal for a directive on the recognition of professional qualifications (4), are based on a system of mutual recognition and not on the coordination of minimum training conditions or the conditions of access to a profession.

----

(1)  COM(2002)119 - OJ C 181 E, 30.7.2002, p. 183.

(2)  Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years' duration, OJ L 19, 24.1.1989.

(3)  Council Directive 92/51/EEC of 18 June 1992 on a second general system for the recognition of professional education and training to supplement Directive 89/48/EEC, OJ L 209, 24.7.1992.

(4)  COM(2002) 119 final.

----
# Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1925Show full title

Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1925 of 26 October 2015 amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against            the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1925                     

# of 26 October 2015

# amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the                        Republic of Moldova                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP(1).

(2)On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region                              of the Republic of Moldova should be extended until 31 October 2016. The Council will carry out a review of the situation                              with regard to the restrictive measures after six months.

(3)Decision 2010/573/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Article 4(2) of Decision 2010/573/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following:

‘2.This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2016. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as                           appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Luxembourg, 26 October 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

F. Mogherini                            

1

Council Decision 2010/573/CFSP of 27 September 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian                              region of the Republic of Moldova (OJ L 253, 28.9.2010, p. 54).
STATE v. BREWER.

No. COA08-303.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Buncombe (04CRS8963, 04CRS8964, 04CRS8965, 04CRS8966, 04CRS8967, 04CRS8968, 04CRS8969, 04CRS8970, 04CRS8971, 04CRS8973, 04CRS8974, 04CRS8975, 04CRS8976, 04CRS8977, 04CRS8978, 04CRS8983, 04CRS52140).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
FREEMAN v. ROTHROCK, et al.

No. 163A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 15, 2008.

Jay A. Gervasi, Jr., Greensboro, for Freeman.

Joy H. Brewer, Ginny P. Lanier, Cary, for Rothrock, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of December 2008 by NC Asso. of Self-Insurers for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Denied. By order of the Court in conference this the 15th day of December 2008."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Congaree Downs Limited Partnership, et al.,*                     Case No. 3:05-cv-02505, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina on August 30, 2005. This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against the Defendants pursuant to Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendants for filling wetlands without a permit.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree requires the defendants to pay a civil penalty and restore the impacted wetland to its natural grade contour. The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this notice. Please address comments to Emery Clark, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Wachovia Building, Suite 500, 1441 Main Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201 and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Congaree Downs Limited Partnership, et al.,*                     Case No. 3:05-cv-02505.                

The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, 901 Richland Lane, Columbia, South Carolina.

                    In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed on the World Wide Web at                     *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​open.html.*

Stephen Samuels, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 05-17848 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Dwain Cornelius FERRELL v. Brad PERRITT, Administrator.

No. 407P14-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2015.

Dwain Cornelius Ferrell, for Ferrell, Dwain Cornelius.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 9th of July 2015 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2015."
July 11, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AMERICAN REALTY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00510-CV V.

EDGAR RODRIGUEZ AND SARA ANN RODRIGUEZ, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on June 7, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, American Realty Associates, LLC.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2023235EN.01006202.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/62

---

Action brought on 12 May 2023 — Bonami.CZ v EUIPO — Roval Print (Bonami)

(Case T-248/23)

(2023/C 235/76)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Bonami.CZ, a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: M.-G. Marinescu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SC Roval Print SRL (Galati, Romania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word trade mark Bonami — Application for registration No 18 009 799

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2023 in Case R 1291/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and reject the opposition entirely; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and reject the opposition entirely;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of procedural requirements related to the (online) substantiation of the opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of procedural requirements related to the (online) substantiation of the opposition;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: List of Gear by Fisheries and Fishery Management Council.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0346.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 30.
    Number of Respondents: 20.
    Average Hours Per Response: 1 hour and 30 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: Under provisions of section 305(a) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. et seq.) as 
amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act (Pub. L. 104-297), the 
Secretary of Commerce is required to publish a list of all fisheries 
under the authority of each Fishery Management Council and of all 
fishing gear to be used in such fisheries. Such a list has been 
published. Any person wishing to use gear not on the list, or engage in 
a fishery not on the list, must provide the appropriate Fishery 
Management Council (or in some cases the Secretary) with a 90 days 
advance written notice. If the Secretary takes no action to prohibit 
such a fishery or use of such gear, the person may proceed.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#14705c6d7a717f54707b773a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5e3a1627303b351e3a313d70393128">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cc88adbaa5a8939ea3bfb8a7a9be8ca3a1aee2a9a3bce2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="246045524d407b764b57504f4156644b49460a414b540a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 8, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18187 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2023121EN.01001502.xml

| 3.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/15

---

Action brought on 17 February 2023 — Nextrend v EUIPO — Xiamen Axent Corporation and Axent Switzerland (Toilet units (part of -))

(Case T-82/23)

(2023/C 121/21)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Nextrend GmbH (Flörsheim am Main, Germany) (represented by: T. Weiland and C. Corbet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Xiamen Axent Corporation Ltd (Haicang, China), Axent Switzerland AG (Rapperswil-Jona, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 2 769 299-0001

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 December 2022 in Case R 1604/2021-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare the design at issue invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the design at issue invalid;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 63(2) in conjunction with Article 53(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 63(2) in conjunction with Article 53(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---