alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.9

Section 906 Certification

Certification
Pursuant to

18
U.S.C Section 1350

As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 40-F of Allstream Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Canada (the "Company"), for the period ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)    the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.

|Dated: April 12, 2004 |  | /s/ JOHN
McLENNAN
John McLennan
Vice Chair & Chief Executive Officer                  
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |                                                                                       
|Dated: April 12, 2004 |  | /s/ DAVID
LAZZARATO
David Lazzarato
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial
Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Allstream Inc. and will be retained by Allstream Inc. and furnished by the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
STATE v. Eugene Johnny WILLIAMS.

No. 506A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 2, 2009.

Staples Hughes, Appellate Defender, Durham, Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for Williams.

William B. Crumpler, Raleigh, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*24The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th day of December 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief;

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Williams) shall have up to and including the 16th day of January 2009 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 2nd day of January 2009."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Registrant's  unaudited  interim  financial  statements for the six month period
ended June 30,  2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to those
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000930364
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST IV

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,503,221
<SECURITIES>                                15,511,542<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  649,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,968,677<F2>
<PP&E>                                      16,790,857
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,413,157)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,512,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,644,597<F3>
<BONDS>                                      3,094,419
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,981,732<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,512,284
<SALES>                                      3,644,548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,829,048
<CGS>                                        3,091,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,091,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               704,108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,862<F5>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,862<F5>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,862<F5>
<EPS-BASIC>                                        172
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      172

<FN>
<F1>Investment  in  hydroelectric  project,  Santee  River  project  and Biomass
project accounted for on equity method in financial statements.
<F2>Includes $785,447 due from affiliates.
<F3>Includes $453,982 due to affiliates.
<F4>Shareholders' equity of $28,106,981 less managing share-
holders' accumulated deficit of $125,249.
<F5>After deduction of minority interest in Providence Project
earnings of $108,502.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Wegener Corporation and
subsidiary

     

    EXHIBIT
10.8

     

    Description
of Executive Compensation

     

    For the
fiscal year ended September 3, 2010, compensation paid to the executive officers
consisted of their individual salaries. These amounts were as
follows:

    


    
      
        
          
            	
                    Name and Position

                  	 	
                    Salary

                  	 
	 
      	 	 	 
	
                    Robert
      A. Placek

                    Chairman
      of the

                    Board; Director

                  	 	$	98,703	 
	 
      	 	 	 	 
	
                    C.
      Troy Woodbury, Jr.

                    President
      and Chief

                    Executive
      Officer;

                    Director

                  	 	$	129,532	 
	 
      	 	 	 	 
	
                    James
      Traicoff

                    Treasurer
      and Chief

                    Financial
      Officer

                  	 	$	91,910	 


          

        

      

    

    


    Effective
October 9, 2009, the Board of Directors appointed C. Troy Woodbury Jr. as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Wegener Corporation and WCI. James
Traicoff was appointed Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Wegener
Corporation and WCI. Robert Placek resigned as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Wegener Corporation on October 9, 2009, but remains as
Chairman of the Board of Wegener Corporation. On October 13, 2009, Ned L.
Mountain tendered his resignation as director of Wegener Corporation and
effective October 16, 2009, Mr. Mountain left WCI. Mr. Mountain was President
and Chief Operating Officer of WCI from January 2005 to October 2009 and
Director of the Company from May 2003 to October 2009. For the fiscal year ended
August 28, 2009, compensation paid to Mr. Mountain was salary of $140,193 and a
Company matching 401K contribution of $7,269.

    


    The above
salary amounts reflect a company-wide reduction in paid working hours by
approximately 10% beginning in January 2009. Current annual base salaries in
effect for the above executive officers are as follows: Robert A. Placek-
$89,539; C.Troy Woodbury, Jr.- $143,924; and James Traicoff- $102,122. The
compensation committee is currently reviewing the salary compensation of the
executive officers as a result of the October 9, 2009 appointments.
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Official Payments Holdings, Inc.; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| January 28, 2013 | /s/ ALEX P. HART                      |
|------------------|---------------------------------------|
|             | Alex P. Hart                          |
|             | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Michelle Lynn Smith

TDCJNo. 1619020Cram Unit

April 24, 2015

1401 State School Road

Gatesville, Tx. 76599

RE: Court of Appeals Number:

Trial Court Case Number:

Style: Smith, Michelle

V.

05-09-01557-CR

The State of Texas

I. The case has been submitted and is pending consideration.

2. The Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over post-conviction writs and

habeas corpus. Please contact the Court of Criminal Appeals for any forms or

information.

3. The Court has no record of an appeal on tile in the above referenced name or trial

court number

4. Enclosed is a copy of the opinion in your appeal.

5. This Court does not appoint counsel

6. Neither the judges nor the staff of this Court can give legal advice. Therefore, you

may wish to contact your attorney; the trial court; or the State Counsel for

Offenders, Texas Department of Criminal Justice. P.O. Box 4005, Huntsville, TX,

77342 for further information or assistance.
10. Enclosed please find the copies you requested.

x II. The cost for the copies you requested is ( clerk record I volume 20$ pages,

supplemental clerk records 2 volumes 18 pages, reporter records 9 volumes 939

pages, total cost to copy & ship S 125.00 we do not have a transcript of oral

argument, it was recorded, and after the opinion and mandate are issued, therecording are destroyed.

Respectfrilly,

Is! Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court

2
STATE v. WOOD.

No. COA08-429.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Guilford (07CRS90975, 07CRS90977).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
STATE v. William Richard BRAY.

No. 563P97-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of July 2008 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of December 2008."
STATE of North Carolina v. Lithomas Dewayne GRAHAM.

No. 564P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

LiThomas D. Graham, Pro Se.

Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*867*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of December 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference call of the Utah State Advisory Committee will convene at 10 a.m. (m.d.t.) and adjourn at 11 a.m. (m.d.t.), Thursday, September 15, 2005. The purpose of the conference call is to provide a status report on the Commission and regional programs, and planning for future activities. 

This conference call is available to the public through the following call-in number: 1-800-473-7796; call-in ID#: 4390-5603. Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and access code. 

To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting John F. Dulles, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, (303) 866-1040 (TDD 303-866-1049), by 3 p.m. (m.d.t.) on Monday, September 12, 2005. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC September 7, 2005. 

Ivy L. Davis, 

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 05-18136 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
# C_2023179EN.01006601.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/66

---

Action brought on 27 March 2023 — Drinks Prod v EUIPO — Wolff and Illg (IGISAN)

(Case T-164/23)

(2023/C 179/92)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Drinks Prod SRL (Păntășești, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Siegfried Wolff (Berlin, Germany), Matthias Illg (Berlin)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark IGISAN — Application for registration No 18 329 332

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 January 2023 in Case R 982/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision rendered by the Board of Appeal in the sense of allowing the appeal filed by the applicant against the decision of the Opposition Division and, consequently, oblige EUIPO to continue the registration proceedings for the trade mark at issue for all requested goods and services in Classes 3 and 5. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision rendered by the Board of Appeal in the sense of allowing the appeal filed by the applicant against the decision of the Opposition Division and, consequently, oblige EUIPO to continue the registration proceedings for the trade mark at issue for all requested goods and services in Classes 3 and 5.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | This                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  December                13, 2007 | /s/David                E. Fountain    |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                               | David                E. Fountain       |
|                                               | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
----

----

----

| Mr. Duane A. Duffy4550 Tule Lake DriveLittleton, CO  80123 | Luke Garvey, c/o Duane Duffy4550 Tule Lake DriveLittleton, CO  80123 | Glenn E. Duffy5679 Old Ranch Rd.Sarasota, FL  34241-9602 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Duane A. Duffy                       Duane A. Duffy                                   |  /s/ Glenn E. Duffy                       Glenn E. Duffy by Duane A. Duffyas his attorney in fact |  /s/ Luke Garvey                        Luke Garvey |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |                                                                                                                                                                             |
|  /s/  James Ober                             James Ober |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |                                                                                                                                                                             |

----

----
# CE2004078EN.01071501.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/715 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/715

---

(2004/C 78 E/0763)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1441/03

by Caroline Jackson (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(24 April 2003)

Subject:   Tyres: application of the Landfill Directive 1999/31/EC

Subject:

The Landfill Directive 1999/31/EC (1) introduces a ban on whole used tyres in landfill starting from July 2003, with a ban on shredded used tyres in landfill starting in July 2006.

1

| 1. | In 2001, 74 % of used tyres in Spain were still going to landfill. Can the Commission give an assurance that it will pursue the Spanish authorities if they fail to meet their obligation under this directive by the due dates, with particular reference to the July 2003 deadline? What action has the Commission taken to emphasise to the Spanish Government the importance of meeting the deadline? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In 2001, 74 % of used tyres in Spain were still going to landfill. Can the Commission give an assurance that it will pursue the Spanish authorities if they fail to meet their obligation under this directive by the due dates, with particular reference to the July 2003 deadline? What action has the Commission taken to emphasise to the Spanish Government the importance of meeting the deadline?

| 2. | In 2001, 69 % of used tyres in Poland went to landfill. Can the Commission state whether the Polish Government has negotiated a derogation from the relevant part of the directive, or will the deadlines apply unaltered from the date of accession to the EU? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In 2001, 69 % of used tyres in Poland went to landfill. Can the Commission state whether the Polish Government has negotiated a derogation from the relevant part of the directive, or will the deadlines apply unaltered from the date of accession to the EU?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(27 May 2003)

(27 May 2003)

Pursuant to Article 5(3)(d) of Directive 1999/31/EC whole used tyres will be banned from landfills as of 16 July 2003 and shredded used tyres as of 16 July 2006.

The Commission is aware that for some Member States the implementation of the ban is a significant challenge. Most Member States have set up or are setting up systems for the collection of tyres, in order to divert them from landfills.

The Commission has the task of ensuring the correct application of Community law, in the light of the powers conferred on it by the EC Treaty. As the guardian of the Treaty, it does not hesitate to take all necessary measures, including infringement procedures under Article 226 of the EC Treaty, in order to ensure the observance of Community law.

Poland has not requested a transition period with regard to the ban of landfilling used tyres. Thus, Poland will have to implement the ban by the date of accession.

---

(1)  OJ L 182, 16.7.1999, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 550 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 550

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District 
                              of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPOSITION OF SUPERIOR COURT.

    Section 903 of title 11 of the District of Columbia Code is amended 
by striking ``fifty-eight'' and inserting ``61''.

            Passed the Senate February 4, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 550

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District 
                              of Columbia.
```
EVERGREEN CONST. CO., INC. v. CITY OF KINSTON.

No. COA08-390.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Lenoir (07CVS1023).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and Remanded.