alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Compensatory  Arrangements with Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.17 
 Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers 
 Base salary information for our
executive officers for 2011 is set forth in the table below. 
  

							
	 Name
	  	 Title
	  	Base Salary	 
	 James E. Heppelmann
	  	President and Chief Executive Officer	  	$	750,000	  
	 Barry F. Cohen
	  	Executive Vice President, Strategy	  	$	415,000	  
	 Paul J. Cunningham
	  	Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales	  	$	415,000	  
	 Anthony DiBona
	  	Executive Vice President, Global Maintenance Support	  	$	363,000	  
	 Marc Diouane
	  	Executive Vice President, Global Services	  	$	350,000	  
	 Jeffrey D. Glidden
	  	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	  	$	415,000	  
	 Robert C. Gremley
	  	Executive Vice President, Corporate Marketing	  	$	275,000	  
	 Brian A. Shepherd
	  	Executive Vice President, Product Development	  	$	315,000	  
	 Aaron C. von Staats
	  	Corporate Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	  	$	350,000	  
	 C. Richard Harrison
	  	Executive Chairman	  	$	500,000	  

 Compensatory arrangements relating to
other aspects of our executive compensation program are included as exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. In addition, further information about compensation of our executive officers is found
in our proxy statements on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as in our periodic Current Report on Form 8-K filings.
**Exhibit 99.33****CONSENT OF J. VOORHEES**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following report and documents,which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statementon Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission: 1. The technical report dated November 11, 2003 entitled “Marlin Project TechnicalReport” (the “Marlin Report”); and  2. The annual information form of the Company dated March 25, 2008, which includesreference to my name in connection with information relating to the Marlin Report andthe properties described therein.Date: March 28, 2008         /s/ James S. Voorhees   Name:  James S. Voorhees   Title:
STATE v. Malik Jaquez WALTON.

No. 439P14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

Mark Montgomery, Durham, for Walton, Malik Jaquez.

William V. Conley, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of December 2014 by Defendant to Deem Notice of Appeal and Petition for Discretionary Review Timely Filed:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."
Patrick L. McCRORY, et al. v. Philip E. BERGER, et al.

No. 113A15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2015.

John R. Wester, David C. Wright, III, Andrew A. Kasper, Charlotte, Robert C. Stephens, Jr., Chief Legal Counsel, Jonathan R. Harris, Associate General Counsel, for McCrory, Patrick L., Governor.

John H. Culver, III, Charlotte, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Matthew T. Houston, Brian C. Fork, Raleigh, Robert William Manoso, for Philip E. Berger. (Pres. Pro Tem.)

Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ann W. Matthews, Special Deputy Attorney General, Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Coal Ash Management Commission.

C. Elizabeth Hall, Raleigh, for Carolinas AGC, et al.

Robert F. Orr, Asheville, for North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law.

E. Hardy Lewis, Raleigh, for Berry, Cherie, et al.

Arch T. Allen, III, Raleigh, for Arch T. Allen, III.

Allegra Collins.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of June 2015 by Arch T. Allen, III for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of June 2015."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2.34

            SCHEDULE OF MATERIAL DIFFERENCES AMONG PERCENTAGE LEASES

          The following lists of material differences between the Percentage
Lease filed as Exhibit 10.2 and the Percentage Lease identified by the Exhibit
number below and is being filed pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
Exhibit                                                       Annual Base         Percentage Rent
Number               Percentage Lease Description                 Rent                Formula
-------              ----------------------------            ---------------          -------
<S>          <C>                                             <C>               <C>
10.2.34      Lease Agreement dated as of August 28,             $963,600       47% of room revenue
             1997 by and between Sunstone Hotel Investors,                     up to $171,521, plus
             L.P. as lessor and Sunstone Hotel Properties,                     60% of room revenue
             Inc., as lessee, for the Regency Plaza                            in excess of $171,521
             located in Los Angeles, California.                               plus 5% of food and
                                                                               beverage revenue, plus
                                                                               100% of sublease and
                                                                               concession revenue
                                                                               and other net revenues.
</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Nicholas Nathaniel CAULEY.

No. 331P01-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Nicholas Nathaniel Cauley, for Cauley, Nicholas Nathaniel.

Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th of April 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Dare County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,124,922
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,684,489
<PP&E>                                      21,875,973
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,587,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,817,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,368,698
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,650
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,528,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,817,361
<SALES>                                     15,480,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,480,689
<CGS>                                        6,764,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,749,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             208,942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (437,653)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (437,653)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (437,653)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 550 

To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District of 

Columbia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2007 

Mr. AKAKA (for himself, Mr. VOINOVICH, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of 

the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPOSITION OF SUPERIOR COURT. 

4 Section 903 of title 11 of the District of Columbia 

5 Code is amended by striking ‘‘fifty-eight’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘61’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stanley Bethune, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 196]

from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), rendered January 6, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated sexual abuse in the first degree, and assault in the second degree (three counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, three counts of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). The contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his guilty plea only insofar as he contends that his plea was infected by the allegedly ineffective assistance and that he entered the plea because of his attorney’s allegedly poor performance *(see People v Burke,*256 AD2d 1244 [1998], *lv denied*93 NY2d 851 [1999]; *see generally People v Petgen,*55 NY2d 529, 534-535 [1982], *rearg denied*57 NY2d 674 [1982]). Those contentions, however, involve matters outside the record on appeal and therefore must be raised by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 *(see People v Jennings,*8 AD3d 1067, 1068 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 676 [2004]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of R&B Falcon Corporation as restated to reflect the
completion of a pooling of interests between Reading & Bates Corporation and
Falcon Drilling Company, Inc. for the three years  ended December 31, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR           YEAR             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1997     DEC-31-1996     DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>              JAN-01-1997     JAN-01-1996     JAN-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                DEC-31-1997     DEC-31-1996     DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                           101            144               46
<SECURITIES>                       0              0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                    195            147               88
<ALLOWANCES>                       7              3                1
<INVENTORY>                       15             13                9
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 316            307              148
<PP&E>                         2,007          1,427            1,062
<DEPRECIATION>                   426            355              314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 1,928          1,456              947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            331            111               90
<BONDS>                            0              0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0              0                0
<PREFERRED>                        0              0                3
<COMMON>                           2              2                1
<OTHER-SE>                       726            715              468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   1,928          1,456              947
<SALES>                            0              0                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 942            610              390
<CGS>                              0              0                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    649            429              325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0              0                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0              0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                46             43               35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  250            140               33
<INCOME-TAX>                      85             27                6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              156            106               23
<DISCONTINUED>                  (162)             0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0              0                3
<CHANGES>                          0              0                0
<NET-INCOME>                      (6)           103               22
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (.04)           .70              .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (.04)           .67              .18


</TABLE>
N.C. DEPT. OF LABOR v. SUTTON.

No. COA08-311.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (07CVS13159).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
CHARTER SCHOOL v. BOARD OF ED., et al.

No. 116P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 23, 2008.

James G. Middlebrooks, Justin D. Howard, Raleigh, Jill R. Wilson, Robert J. King, III, Elizabeth V. LaFollette, Greensboro, for Charlotte-Mecklenburg BOE, et al.

Richard A. Vinroot, Charlotte, for Charter Schools.

Lisa Lukasik, Allison B. Schafer, for School Boards Assoc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of July 2008 by NC School Boards for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of July 2008."
Exhibit 99.2


                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Monterey Bay Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark R.
Andino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                    Monterey Bay Bancorp, Inc.




Date:    May 12, 2003               By:      /s/ Mark R. Andino
                                             ------------------
                                             Mark R. Andino
                                             Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Monterey Bay Bancorp,  Inc. and will be retained by Monterey Bay
Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committees on Rules of Bankruptcy, Civil, and Criminal Procedure, and the Rules of Evidence.

# ACTION:

 Notice of cancellation of four open hearings and extension of one open hearing.

# SUMMARY:

Four public hearings on proposed rules amendments have been canceled and one public hearing has been extended for a second day. The following public hearings on proposed rules amendments have been canceled:
      - Evidence Rules in New Haven, Connecticut, on January 27, 2005;
      - Bankruptcy Rules in Washington, DC., on February 3, 2005; and in San Francisco, California, on February 7, 2005; and
      - Criminal Rules in Washington, DC., on February 4, 2005.

The following public hearing on proposed rules amendments has been extended for a second day:
      - The public hearing on proposed amendments to the Civil Rules, in Washington, DC., has been extended one additional day. The hearings will be held on February 11 and 12, 2005. The hearings on each day will be held at 8:30 a.m., in the Judicial Conference Center of the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle, NE.

                        [Original notice of all five hearings appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 13, 2004.]                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC. 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: January 26, 2005.

John K. Rabiej,

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 05-1764  Filed 1-13-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
STATE v. Mickey Vonrice ROLLINS.

No. 138PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 29, 2008.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Rollins.

Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of September 2008 by State of NC for Extension to File State's New Brief:

"Motion Allowed. State of NC shall have up to and including the 27th day of October 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of September 2008."
BYRD, et al. v. FRANKLIN COUNTY.

No. 462A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 24, 2015.

Mr. Aubrey S. Tomlinson, Jr., Louisburg, for Franklin County.

Mr. George B. Currin, Raleigh, for Byrd, Aaron, et al.

Mr. Camden R. Webb, Raleigh, for Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of August 2015 by Respondent to Amend Certificate of Service on New Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of August 2015."
**EXHIBIT 99.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly    Report on Form 10-QSB complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained    in such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial    condition and results of operations of the Company.**Littlefield Corporation**    November 10, 2002    By:/s/ JEFFREY L MINCH    Jeffrey L. Minch     President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ KATHRYN L SCANLON    Kathryn L. Scanlon    Secretary and Treasurer    (Principal financial and accounting officer)

----

----
REDDING v. REDDING.

No. S15A1508.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Oct. 19, 2015.

Carlton Edward Joyce, Bouhan, Williams & Levy, Lucas Drayton Bradley, Bouhan Falligrant LLP, Savannah, for appellant.

Kenneth Paul Johnson, Robert Scot Kraeuter, Johnson, Kraeuter & Dunn, LLC, Savannah, for appellee.

**Opinion**

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

*Affirmed without opinion.*

All the Justices concur.
**Exhibit 99.4****Consent of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants**     We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of our report dated March 3, 2006relating to the consolidated financial statements of Goldcorp. Inc. for the year ended December 31,2005, and to the reference to us under the heading “Interests of Experts” in the Annual InformationForm dated March 20, 2006 filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-126037,333-126038, 333-126039 and 333-126040 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 3, 2006 appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPDeloitte & Touche LLP
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. Hui S. SMITH, Chong Su Kim, Jerry D. Smith, Joon Hee Nam, Mounib Aoun, Jihad L. Libbus, Yon Su Nam, and Hosun Kim.

No. 107P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

H. Clay Flodges, for Aoun, Mounib.

Christopher Carrington, for Garrett Enterprise, LLC, et al.

JihaD L. Libbus, for Libbus, Jihad L.

John N. Hutson, Jr., Raleigh, for Branch Banking and Trust Company.

Michael A. Burger, for Branch Banking and Trust Company.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of March 2015 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RAIT Financial Trust (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack E. Salmon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                  |  |  |  | /s/ Jack E. Salmon     
|                  |  |  |  | Jack E. Salmon         
|February 29, 2008 |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer