alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 174 (Friday, September 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17996]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
September 12, 2005:
    A closed meeting will be held on Thursday, September 15, 2005 at 2 
p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
September 15, 2005, will be:
    Formal orders of investigations;
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: September 7, 2005.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-17996 Filed 9-7-05; 11 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
# C_2023261EN.01003901.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/39

---

Action brought on 30 May 2023 — Hexal v Commission

(Case T-299/23)

(2023/C 261/54)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hexal AG (Holzkirchen, Germany) (represented by: A. Meier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision; and

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The action, which is directed against Commission Implementing Decision [C(2023) 3067 final] of 2 May 2023 amending the marketing authorisation granted by Decision C(2014) 601 final for ‘Tecfidera — Dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use, relies on two pleas in law.

By its first plea, the applicant submits that there has been a clear infringement of Article 14(11) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (1) because the authorisation in respect of the new therapeutic indication of Tecfidera was not obtained during the first eight years after the granting of authorisation, but only at a later point in time.

By its second plea, the applicant submits that there has been a manifest error of assessment in the interpretation of the judgment of the European Court of Justice in joined cases C-438/21 P to C-440/21 P (2) and, as a result, the Commission has erred in law in concluding that Tecfidera does not belong to the global marketing authorisation of Fumaderm.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 1).

(2)  Judgment of 16 March 2023, Commission and Others v Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma, C-438/21 P to C-440/21 P, EU:C:2023:213.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INNOVA
CORPORATION FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,454,763
<SECURITIES>                                  19,319,495
<RECEIVABLES>                                 11,368,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (204,658)
<INVENTORY>                                   12,048,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              45,236,379
<PP&E>                                        15,110,948
<DEPRECIATION>                               (3,976,987)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                56,795,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,720,083
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      86,621,122
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,261,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  56,795,457
<SALES>                                       36,099,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              36,099,884
<CGS>                                         25,447,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 25,447,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              11,828,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (546,161)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,060,019)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (1,060,019)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,060,019)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.18)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Civil Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Civil Procedure.

ACTION:  Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure will hold a 
two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not 
participation.

DATES: October 27-28, 2005.

TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Vintners Inn, 4350 Barnes Road, Santa Rosa, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: September 2, 2005.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 05-18064 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
Additional Investor Joinder Agreement to Investors' Rights Agreement



 Exhibit 4.13 
 ADDITIONAL INVESTOR JOINDER AGREEMENT 
 JOINDER AGREEMENT (this
“Joinder Agreement”) made as of the 21st
day of April, 2010. 
 BETWEEN: 
  

	(1)	iSoftStone Holdings Limited, a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Company”); and 


 

	(2)	JINYUAN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) COMPANY LIMITED



 (the “New Note Holder”). 

 RECITALS: 

 

	(A)	On the 23th day of December 2009, the Company and the Investors entered into that certain Second Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement (the
“Investors’ Rights Agreement”). Pursuant to the Investors’ Rights Agreement, the New Note Holder to whom the Company wishes to issue up to $33 million principal amount of the Convertible Notes shall agree to be bound by
and subject to the terms and conditions of the Investors’ Rights Agreement pursuant to this Joinder Agreement. 

  

	(B)	The New Note Holder wishes to be issued to it a Convertible Note (the “Note”) in the principal amount US$4,000,000. 


 

	(C)	The Company enters this Joinder Agreement on behalf of itself and as agent for all the Investors. 


NOW THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES as follows: 
  

	1.	Interpretation. In this Agreement, capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Investors’
Rights Agreement. 

  

	2.	Covenant. The New Note Holder hereby covenants to the Company as trustee for all other persons who are at present or who may hereafter become bound by the
Investors’ Rights Agreement, and to the Company itself to adhere to and be bound by and subject to all the duties, burdens and obligations of a Note Holder holding the Convertible Notes imposed pursuant to the provisions of the Investors’
Rights Agreement and all documents expressed in writing to be supplemental or ancillary thereto as if the New Note Holder had been an original party to the Investors’ Rights Agreement. 


 

	3.	Enforceability. Each Investor and the Company shall be entitled to enforce the Investors’ Rights Agreement against the New Note Holder. The New Note Holder
shall be entitled to all rights and benefits of the Note Holders under the Investors’ Rights Agreement in each case as if the New Note Holder had been an original party to the Investors’ Rights Agreement. 









	4.	Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed exclusively in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regards to conflicts
of law principles. 

  

	5.	Notice. Any notice required or permitted by the Investors’ Rights Agreement shall be given to the New Note Holder at the address listed beside the New Note
Holder’s signature below. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed on the date first above written.

  

					
	iSOFTSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Tianwen Liu

		 	Name:	 	
		 	Title:	 	
	
	JINYUAN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) COMPANY LIMITED




		
	By:	 	 /s/ Yong Tao Zhao

		 	Name:	 	Yong Tao Zhao
		 	Title:	 	
		 	Address:	 	




		 	Fax:
# Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1142Show full title

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1142 of 13 July 2015 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive            measures against Belarus         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1142                     

# of 13 July 2015

# implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus(1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 15 October 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/642/CFSP.

(2)The Council considers that the entries for four persons and three entities on the list of persons and entities subject to                              restrictive measures as set out in the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP should be amended.

(3)The Council also considers that two persons and four entities should be removed from the list of persons and entities subject                              to restrictive measures as set out in the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP.

(4)The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

F. Etgen                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### I.The following persons and entities are deleted from the list set out in the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP:U.K.

Persons

Entities

### II.The entries for the following persons and entities set out in the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP are replaced by the following:U.K.

Persons

Entities

1

OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 4

   To make the United States more secure by implementing unfinished 
recommendations of the 9/11 Commission to fight the war on terror more 
   effectively, to improve homeland security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

   Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Lieberman, Ms. Collins, Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
  Schumer, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Lautenberg, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Webb, Mr. 
Menendez, Ms. Landrieu, and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make the United States more secure by implementing unfinished 
recommendations of the 9/11 Commission to fight the war on terror more 
   effectively, to improve homeland security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving America's Security by 
Implementing Unfinished Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that Congress should enact, and the 
President should sign, legislation to make the United States more 
secure by implementing unfinished recommendations of the 9/11 
Commission to fight the war on terror more effectively and to improve 
homeland security.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Ronald Michael McCRARY.

No. 413A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 15, 2015.

John L. Wait, Winston-Salem, for McCrary, Ronald Michael.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 10th of September 2015 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of September 2015."
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                    CNA SURETY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                INCORPORATED
COMPANY                                                              IN
-------                                                        --------------
<S>                                                            <C>
CNA Surety Corporation......................................         Delaware
Capsure Holdings Corp. (f/k/a Nucorp, Inc.).................         Delaware
Capsure Financial Group, Inc. ..............................         Oklahoma
(f/k/a/ Nucorp Energy of Oklahoma, Inc.)
NI Acquisition Corp. .......................................            Texas
SI Acquisition Corp. .......................................            Texas
Surewest Financial Corp. ...................................         Delaware
Troy Fain Insurance, Inc. ..................................          Florida
Western Surety Company......................................     South Dakota
Surety Bonding Company of America...........................     South Dakota
Universal Surety Holding Corp. .............................            Texas
Universal Surety of America.................................            Texas
De Montfort Group Limited...................................   United Kingdom
</Table>
STATE v. Charles Everette HINTON.

No. 449P11-12.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Charles E. Hinton, Cary, for Hinton, Charles Everette.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31 st of July 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Remedial Writ:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
KEEN TRANSPORT, INC. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROL & PUBLIC SAFETY, DIV. OF STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, MOTOR CARRIER ENFORCEMENT SECTION.

No. COA08-910.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 3, 2009.

Certification Date February 23, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (07CVS12922).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. BLACKBURN.

No. COA08-914.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from Forsyth (07CRS54014, 07CRS22502).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      ORTHODONTIC CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), of Orthodontic Centers of America, Inc. (the
"Company"), I, Thomas J. Sandeman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


August 14, 2003                             /s/   Thomas J. Sandeman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Thomas J. Sandeman
                                            Chief Financial Officer


This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability
pursuant to that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
```

                                                                EXHIBIT 14.(A).1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-139021 and 333-111932) and Form F-3 (No. 333-128847) of our
report dated March 31, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Tefron Ltd. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the
year ended December 31, 2008.

Haifa, Israel                                  KOST, FORER, GABBAY and KASIERER

June 30, 2009                               A member of Ernst & Young Global
```
# CE2004088EN.01041402.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/414 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/414

---

(2004/C 88 E/0421)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2487/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(25 July 2003)

Subject:   Violations of religious freedom in Turkmenistan and protection of Muslim and Russian Orthodox communities

Subject:

Given that:

| — | on 27 May 2003, an operational group from the Ashgabad city division of the Ministry of the Interior raided the home of a Hare Krishna female devotee, Gaurabhakta Devi Dasi, whose home was used as a place of worship. |
| --- | --- |

—

on 27 May 2003, an operational group from the Ashgabad city division of the Ministry of the Interior raided the home of a Hare Krishna female devotee, Gaurabhakta Devi Dasi, whose home was used as a place of worship.

| — | during the raid, two other devotees, Varshana Prabhu and Mishra Bhagavan Prabhu, were arrested. In attempting to extract information from Mishra Bhagavan, the police beat him so hard that they drew blood. |
| --- | --- |

—

during the raid, two other devotees, Varshana Prabhu and Mishra Bhagavan Prabhu, were arrested. In attempting to extract information from Mishra Bhagavan, the police beat him so hard that they drew blood.

| — | the Turkmenistan authorities are still refusing to allow non-Muslim and non-Russian Orthodox communities to register. |
| --- | --- |

—

the Turkmenistan authorities are still refusing to allow non-Muslim and non-Russian Orthodox communities to register.

| — | the Constitution of Turkmenistan upholds the right to privacy in one's home, which may be restricted only in exceptional circumstances and on a legal basis, neither of which was the case in the events which occurred on 27 May. |
| --- | --- |

—

the Constitution of Turkmenistan upholds the right to privacy in one's home, which may be restricted only in exceptional circumstances and on a legal basis, neither of which was the case in the events which occurred on 27 May.

Will the Commission state:

| — | whether it is aware of the serious and persistent violations of religious freedom in Turkmenistan and of the above incidents? |
| --- | --- |

—

whether it is aware of the serious and persistent violations of religious freedom in Turkmenistan and of the above incidents?

| — | what action does it intend to support or call for in order to bring pressure to bear on the Turkmenistan authorities with a view to guaranteeing religious freedom in the country? |
| --- | --- |

—

what action does it intend to support or call for in order to bring pressure to bear on the Turkmenistan authorities with a view to guaranteeing religious freedom in the country?

---