alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements included herein and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 4,203,937
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            663,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                              24,054
<INVENTORY>                                            5,053,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       9,971,020
<PP&E>                                                 6,446,341
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (2,934,517)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        15,471,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  4,184,636
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                7,143
<COMMON>                                                  40,706
<OTHER-SE>                                             9,274,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          15,471,182
<SALES>                                                2,503,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       3,551,469
<CGS>                                                  2,333,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          2,333,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       6,790,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        21,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (4,675,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (4,675,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (4,675,406)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (1.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0


</TABLE>
# C_2023321EN.01005201.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/52

---

Action brought on 2 July 2023 — Verdeja Muñiz v ECB

(Case T-352/23)

(2023/C 321/58)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Pedro Verdeja Muñiz (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: F. Verdeja González, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul all the decisions of the European Central Bank (‘the ECB’) from 21 July 2022 until 15 September 2023 raising the Euribor and intervening in the finance and mortgage market without protecting the applicant as a debtor; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul all the decisions of the European Central Bank (‘the ECB’) from 21 July 2022 until 15 September 2023 raising the Euribor and intervening in the finance and mortgage market without protecting the applicant as a debtor;

| — | order the ECB to adopt fiscal measures so that the Euribor applicable to the applicant’s mortgage debt is maintained at its level before the decision of 14 April 2022, and to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the ECB to adopt fiscal measures so that the Euribor applicable to the applicant’s mortgage debt is maintained at its level before the decision of 14 April 2022, and to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, based on the legal premiss that the applicant cannot and must not challenge the decisions of the ECB. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, based on the legal premiss that the applicant cannot and must not challenge the decisions of the ECB.

| 2. | Second plea in law, based on the legal premiss that the ECB must not cause price rises, contrary to Article 282(2) TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, based on the legal premiss that the ECB must not cause price rises, contrary to Article 282(2) TFEU.

| 3. | Third plea in law, based on the legal premiss that the ECB must not obstruct market freedom, pursuant to Article 127(1) TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, based on the legal premiss that the ECB must not obstruct market freedom, pursuant to Article 127(1) TFEU.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law based on the legal premiss that the ECB must take effective measures to protect against increases in the Euribor. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law based on the legal premiss that the ECB must take effective measures to protect against increases in the Euribor.

---
STATE v. Geraldine Lewis RAMOS.

No. 535A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2008.

Peter Wood, for Ramos.

C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ____, 668 S.E.2d 357.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of December 2008 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of December 2008."
----

(2004/C 33 E/167)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1769/03

by Dominique Vlasto (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(28 May 2003)

Subject:   Compensation from the IOPC Fund for the damage caused by the Prestige disaster

The Prestige sank on 13 November 2002. On 9 May the IOPC Fund announced that the victims of the Prestige oil slick would initially receive 15 % of the total estimated damages, which amount to almost EUR 1 billion.

The author of this question shares the indignation of the victims, who, six months after the disaster, are being offered derisory compensation for the damage and work it caused. In the Erika II legislative package the Commission proposed setting up a Community compensation fund, the COPE Fund. This text was adopted by Parliament at first reading in June 2001 and appears to have been held up in the Council ever since.

----
(August 24, 2005)

#### In the Matter of Albert Baldeo et al., Respondents, v Board of Elections of City of New York, Respondent, and Dhanpaul Narine, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 921]

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Dhanpaul Narine as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2005, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the New York City Council, 28th Council District, Dhanpaul Narine appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated August 12, 2005, which granted the petition and invalidated the designating petition.

Ordered that the final order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and the Board of Elections of the City of New York is directed to place the name of Dhanpaul Narine on the appropriate ballot.

The petitioners failed to sustain their burden of proof of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that the address listed in the statement of the challenged subscribing witness in the designating petition was no longer his “residence” at the time he signed the statement (Election Law § 6-132; *see Matter of Fernandez v Monegro,*10 AD3d 429, 430 [2004]; *Matter of Boyland v Board of Elections of City of N.Y.,*104 AD2d 463 [1984]). H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

Michael J. Talbot, C.J. 

People v Perkins; People v Williams; People v Hyall Presiding Judge 

Docket Nos. 323454; 323876; 325741 All Court of Appeals 

Judges 

LC Nos. 13-032653-FC; 13-033526-FC; 13-032654-FC 

The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(1) 

to resolve the conflict between this case and People v Skinner, _ Mich App _; _ NW2d 

_ (2016) (Docket No. 3 17892). 

The Court further orders that part IV, section C, of the opinion in this case, 

released on January 19, 2016, is vacated in its entirety. MCR 7.215(1)(5). 

Appellant Hyatt may fi le a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk's 

certification of this order. Appellee may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the service 

of appellant's brief. 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr.. Chief Clerk, on 

FEB 1 2 2016 

Dare 

~~J~ '
v202536_ex10-1 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing



    
      Exhibit
10.1
EASTERN CAROLINA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY v. LOFTON.

No. 32PA15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 11, 2015.

Thomas E. Stroud, for Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority.

E. Bradley Evans, Winterville, for Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority.

John R. Keller, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

Andrew Cogdell, Morganton, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

Theodore O. Fillette, III, Charlotte, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

Cheryl A. Marteney, for Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority.

Michael J. Parrish, New Bern, for Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority.

Peter Gilbert, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

Charles Francis, for Raleigh Housing Authority.

Celia Pistolis, Raleigh, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

William K. Brownlee, Raleigh, for Apartment Association of North Carolina.

Ruth Sheehan, for Raleigh Housing Authority.

Alan D. Woodlief, Jr., Raleigh, for Raleigh Housing Authority.

John R. Wester, Charlotte, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

Thomas Holderness, Charlotte, for Lofton, Sherbreda.

John R. Rittelmeyer, Raleigh, for Disability Rights North Carolina.

Yasmin Farahi, for Disability Rights North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th of August 2015 by Disability Rights North Carolina for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of August 2015."
RIDGE CARE, INC. v. N.C. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.

No. COA08-237.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 3, 2009.

Certification Date March 23, 2009.

Appeal from Dept. of Health & Human Ser (07DHR169).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/634Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/634 of 20 April 2015 appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/634                     

# of 20 April 2015

# appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and                              Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015(1).

(2)On 24 June 2014 the Council adopted Decision 2014/411/EU appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee(2).

(3)This member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office                              of Mr Alessandro GRUMELLI,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Ferdinand WYCKMANS, *Algemeen Secretaris Landelijke bediendencentrale — Nationaal Verbond voor Kaderpersoneel Noordergewest (LBC-NVK)*, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 20 September 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 20 April 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

J. Dūklavs                            

1

OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.                           

2

OJ L 190, 28.6.2014, p. 82.
SMITH v. BECK.

No. COA08-403.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from Scotland (05CVS509).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. William Leroy BARNES.

No. 146A94-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, George B. Currin, Raleigh, for Barnes.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State of NC.

David Pishko, Winston-Salem, for NCATL.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd day of October 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Rowan County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
ELAM, et al. v. WILLIAM DOUGLAS MANAGEMENT, INC., et al.

No. 216P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 22, 2015.

Kenneth T. Davies, for Elam, Amy Pharr, et al.

M. Aaron Lay, Charlotte, for William Douglas Management, Inc.

Lori Gilmore, for Charlotte House Association Of Unit Owners, Inc.

Erik M. Rosenwood, Charlotte, for Elam, Amy Pharr, et al.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of July 2015 by Plaintiffs for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of July 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 175 (Monday, September 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17955]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 175 / Monday, September 12, 2005 / 
Notices

[[Page 53773]]



AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Board for International Food and Agricultural Development; One 
Hundred and Forty-Fifth Meeting; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby 
given of the one hundred and forty-fifth meeting of the Board for 
International Food and Agricultural Development (BIFAD). The meeting 
will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. and from 1 p.m. to 6:15 p.m. on 
October 12th, 2005 in the Marriott Hotel, 7th and Grand Avenue, Des 
Moines, Iowa. The meeting is being held in conjunction with the World 
Food Prize events scheduled for October 13-14 in Des Moines.
    The BIFAD will interact with representatives from U.S. 
universities, Collaborative Research Support Programs (CRSPs), 
agribusiness and private sector communities along with international 
agriculture leaders from Africa. Themes will focus on agriculture and 
human nutrition as they relate to countering HIV/AIDS, enhancing 
cognitive child development and other aspects of human nutrition as 
well as emerging issues in international agricultural development, and 
other items of general interest.
    The meeting is free and open to the public. Those wishing to attend 
the meeting or obtain additional information about BIFAD should contact 
John Rifenbark, the Designated Federal Officer for BIFAD. Write him in 
care of the U.S. Agency for International Development, Ronald Reagan 
Building, Office of Agriculture and Food Security, 1300 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Room 2.11-85, Washington DC, 20523-2110 or telephone him 
at (202) 712-0163 or fax (202) 216-3010.

John T. Rifenbark,
USAID Designated Federal Officer for BIFAD, Office of Agriculture, 
Bureau for Economic Growth, Agriculture & Trade, U.S. Agency for 
International Development.
[FR Doc. 05-17955 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-P
Frances ATIAPO, Employee v. GOREE LOGISTICS, INC., and Owen Thomas, Inc., Employer, NonInsured and The North Carolina Industrial Commission v. Goree Logistics, Inc., and Owen Thomas, Inc., NonInsured, Employer, and Mandieme Diouf, Individually.

No. 139P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

John F. Scarborough, Charlotte, for Owen Thomas, Inc.

*859Lawrence P. Margolis, Charlotte, for Goree Logistics, Inc., et al.

Kenneth C. Martin, Charlotte, for Atiapo, Frances.

Marc X. Sneed, Assistant Attorney General.

John F. Scarbrough, Attorney at Law, for Owen Thomas, Inc.

Sidney S. Eagles, Jr., Raleigh, for American Trucking Association, Inc. and North Carolina Trucking Association.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st of April 2015 by Defendant (Owen Thomas, Inc.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Charles M. Weaver, certify that:

   1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
         S&P-Linked Investment Trust Certificates, Series 1997-SP-1 Trust (the
         "Trust");

   2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

   3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports; and

   4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         Depositor and the Trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
         agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the Depositor and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.



Date: October 9, 2007


      /s/ Charles M. Weaver
-----------------------------------------
Charles M. Weaver, Senior Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1093

In Re: ANTONIO MOSLEY, a/k/a Abdullah Hamid,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(3:11-cr-00336-RJC-1; 3:14-cv-00399-RJC)

Submitted: May 12, 2016 Decided: June 8, 2016

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per 

curiam opinion.

Antonio Mosley, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Mosley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging 

that the district court has unduly delayed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) action in ruling on his motion for access to sealed court 

records and his motion for bond. He further claims that the 

district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. 

Because the district court’s criminal docket reveals that the 

court denied Mosley’s § 3582(c)(2) motion on February 5, 2016, we 

dismiss Mosley’s mandamus petition in part as moot. Moreover, our 

review of the civil docket does not reveal undue delay in the 

district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition in 

part. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny 

Mosley’s motion for release on bail. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART

AND DENIED IN PART
ATLANTIC INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and ATCO International, Inc. v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, d/b/a Bank of America, N.A., Bank of America, Ltd., Bank of America Singapore, and Bank of America Asia, and Bank of America, Ltd.

No. 303P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Thomas H. Stark, Chapel Hill, for Atlantic Integrated Tech., et al.

Justin D. Howard, Raleigh, Monica E. Webb, for Bank of America Corp., et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 26th day of June 2008 in this *726matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
Order entered April 14, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01548-CV

PURE GEN HOLDINGS, INC., Appellant

V.

NEORA, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-10205

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s April 10, 2020 unopposed second motion to 

extend time to file its opening brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time 

to May 15, 2020. We caution appellee that further extension requests in this 

accelerated appeal will be disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE