alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
 <MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                            <C>               <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS             6-MOS            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-1-1997        FEB-1-1997       FEB-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAY-25-1996       AUG-17-1996      NOV-09-1996
<CASH>                              38,800            44,837           42,834
<SECURITIES>                             0                 0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                       23,024            46,752           34,579
<ALLOWANCES>                             0                 0                0
<INVENTORY>                        559,009           560,790          679,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   664,437           694,990          804,564
<PP&E>                           1,578,088         1,629,617        1,542,501
<DEPRECIATION>                     568,972           592,536          605,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   1,702,820         1,775,688        1,760,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              414,010           455,401          554,890
<BONDS>                            616,655           636,469          576,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0                 0                0
<PREFERRED>                              0                 0                0
<COMMON>                               540               540              540
<OTHER-SE>                         578,565           593,994          531,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     1,702,820         1,775,688        1,760,738
<SALES>                          1,040,028         1,893,942        2,729,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,040,028         1,893,942        2,729,084
<CGS>                              737,956         1,336,484        1,927,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      273,736           495,471          721,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0                 0                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0                 0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  13,104            22,282           30,606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     15,232            39,705           49,853
<INCOME-TAX>                         5,788            15,088           18,944
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  9,444            24,617           30,909
<DISCONTINUED>                           0                 0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0                 0                0
<CHANGES>                                0                 0                0
<NET-INCOME>                         9,444            24,617           30,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.18              0.46             0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.17              0.43             0.55
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                              ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Baron Capital Trust (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
L. Astorino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      June 6, 2003

                                     BARON CAPITAL TRUST


                                     By:  /s/ Robert L. Astorino
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Robert L. Astorino
                                          Chief Executive Officer


                                       55
# CE2004078EN.01011001.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/110

---

(2004/C 78 E/0111)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2391/03

by Elisabeth Jeggle (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(21 July 2003)

Subject:   Numbers of pigs and cattle in the EU 15 and the 10 accession countries

Subject:

To enable me to answer a question from a constituent, would the Commission please tell me the number of pigs and cattle (no further breakdown required) in the 15 EU Member States and the 10 accession countries?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(16 September 2003)

(16 September 2003)

At the December 2002 survey total cattle herd accounted for 78 281 022 heads in the EU-15 and 10 280 171 heads in the 10 Acceding Countries. Total pig herd accounted for 122 015 941 heads in the EU-15 and 32 222 296 heads in the 10 Acceding Countries.

| Heads | Cattle herd | Pig herd |
| --- | --- | --- |
| BE (Belgium) | 2 758 463 | 6 600 158 |
| DK (Denmark) | 1 740 000 | 12 879 000 |
| D (Germany) | 13 731 958 | 26 251 490 |
| GR (Greece) | 573 000 | 903 000 |
| E (Spain) | 6 278 519 | 23 518 039 |
| F (France) | 19 729 162 | 15296000 |
| IRL (Ireland) | 6 337 818 | 1 781 500 |
| I (Italy) | 6 695 000 | 9 166 000 |
| L (Luxembourg) | 189 850 | 76 478 |
| NL (Netherlands) | 3 780 000 | 11 154 000 |
| AT (Austria) | 2 066 942 | 3 304 650 |
| Ρ (Portugal) | 1 395 128 | 2 343 705 |
| FI (Finland) | 1 011 672 | 1 422 800 |
| SE (Sweden) | 1 612 300 | 1 989 000 |
| UK (United Kingdom) | 10 381 210 | 5 330 121 |
| Total EU-15 | 78 281 022 | 122 015 941 |
| CY (Cyprus) | 58 139 | 490 818 |
| CZ (Czech Republic) | 1 511 000 | 3 505 000 |
| EE Estonia | 253 000 | 345 400 |
| HU Hungary | 770 000 | 5 082 000 |
| LT Lithuania | 779 100 | 1 061 000 |
| LV Latvia | 388 100 | 453 200 |
| MT Malta | 18 770 | 78 303 |
| PL Poland | 5 420 987 | 18 997 030 |
| SI Slovenia | 473 240 | 655 665 |
| SK Slovak Republic | 607 835 | 1 553 880 |
| Total Acceding Countries | 10 280 171 | 32 222 296 |

Heads

Cattle herd

Pig herd

BE (Belgium)

2 758 463

6 600 158

DK (Denmark)

1 740 000

12 879 000

D (Germany)

13 731 958

26 251 490

GR (Greece)

573 000

903 000

E (Spain)

6 278 519

23 518 039

F (France)

19 729 162

15296000

IRL (Ireland)

6 337 818

1 781 500

I (Italy)

6 695 000

9 166 000

L (Luxembourg)

189 850

76 478

NL (Netherlands)

3 780 000

11 154 000

AT (Austria)

2 066 942

3 304 650

Ρ (Portugal)

1 395 128

2 343 705

FI (Finland)

1 011 672

1 422 800

SE (Sweden)

1 612 300

1 989 000

UK (United Kingdom)

10 381 210

5 330 121

Total EU-15

78 281 022

122 015 941

CY (Cyprus)

58 139

490 818

CZ (Czech Republic)

1 511 000

3 505 000

EE Estonia

253 000

345 400

HU Hungary

770 000

5 082 000

LT Lithuania

779 100

1 061 000

LV Latvia

388 100

453 200

MT Malta

18 770

78 303

PL Poland

5 420 987

18 997 030

SI Slovenia

473 240

655 665

SK Slovak Republic

607 835

1 553 880

Total Acceding Countries

10 280 171

32 222 296

Source: Eurostat, Cattle and pig survey, December 2002.

---
ex10-45.htm


Exhibit 10.45







August 26, 2010


EXTENSION N3 TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF AUGUST 1, 2004







By and between Siberian Energy Group Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and David Zaikin (“Employee”) entered into this 26th day of August, 2010, and made effective as of July 1, 2010.







WHEREAS the Company and the Employee previously signed the Employment Agreement, which stated the term of employment to start on August 1, 2004 and to end on December 31, 2008 (the “Agreement”, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A), and subsequent extensions for the year 2009 and for six months of 2010 till June 30, 2010;







AND WHEREAS the Company and the Employee wish to further extend the term of the employment agreement;







NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH, that the Company and the Employee agree as follows:







Point 4 “Term” of the employment Agreement to be revised and the term of the Agreement to be extended until December 31, 2010 (the “Extended Term”).







Point 5.1 “Compensation” of the employment Agreement to be revised and annual salary of the Employee to be stated as US$180,000.







Point 6 “Stock Option” of the employment Agreement is to be removed. A new Stock Option agreement will be entered into between the Company and the Employee upon the resolution of the Board of directors of the Company.







All other provisions of the Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2004 shall remain in full force and effect until the expiration of the Extended Term.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.


 





	
EMPLOYEE

	
COMPANY


	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	
/s/ David Zaikin

	
/s/ Elena Pochapski


	
David Zaikin,

	
Elena Pochapski


	
71 Woodchester Crt,

	
CFO


	
Thornhill, ON, L4J 7V6

	
Siberian Energy Group Inc.


	
Canada
ELLISON v. GAMBILL OIL, et al.

No. 541A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 11, 2008.

Warren A. Hutton, Forrest A. Ferrell, Hickory, for Ellison.

Stephen L. Palmer, Hickory, for Palmer,

Jimmy D. Reeves, M. Alexandra Reeves, West Jefferson, for Gambill.

Jason White, for Kate H. Ellison.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of September 2008 by Defendants (Gosai & B&B) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendants (Gosai & B&B) shall have up to and including the 24th day of September 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of September 2008."
# CE2004088EN.01033301.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/333 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/333

---

(2004/C 88 E/0340)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0867/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(20 March 2003)

Subject:   Economic crisis in Venezuela

Subject:

In the last few months the social, economic and political crisis in South America has worsened and is also affecting Venezuela.

There are many Italian nationals in Venezuela and one of the largest Italian communities in the world lives there, together with the Spanish community.

The current situation has led to the virtual collapse of all economic activities and the closure of businesses, leading to an enormous fall in profits for Italian firms operating in Venezuela and widespread unemployment.

All this is in effect causing a state of civil war, in which looting, murder, theft and robbery are commonplace, but no international institution is interested in finding an effective solution to the problem.

Now, after years of deprivation, European citizens living in Venezuela have still not been given any support by the EU.

In view of all this, can the Commission say:

| 1. | whether there are any specific aid programmes for the South American countries currently in a state of crisis; |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether there are any specific aid programmes for the South American countries currently in a state of crisis;

| 2. | whether there are any action programmes for the benefit of European citizens living in Venezuela? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether there are any action programmes for the benefit of European citizens living in Venezuela?

Can it also give a general assessment of the situation?

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 52397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17592]



[[Page 52397]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel: Understanding Social Disparities in Chronic Disease 
Health Outcomes, Program Announcement Number DP-05-132; Correction

    Correction: Notice of program announcement number DP-05-132 was 
published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2005, Volume 70, Number 
155, pages 47214-47215. The meeting has been cancelled.
    Time and Date: 3 p.m.-5 p.m., September 1, 2005 (Closed).
    Meeting Location: Teleconference.
    For Further Information Contact: Gwen Cattledge, PhD, Scientific 
Review Administrator, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention 
and Health Promotion, 4770 Buford Highway, MS-K92, Atlanta, GA 30341, 
Telephone (770) 488-4655.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Diane Allen,
Director, Acting Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 05-17592 Filed 8-31-05; 11:41 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# C_2018334EN.01000101.xml

| 19.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2017-2018 SESSION

Sittings of 3 to 6 July 2017

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 78, 1.3.2018.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EDISON
MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         441,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               522,442
<PP&E>                                       3,320,399
<DEPRECIATION>                                 199,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,115,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          313,182
<BONDS>                                      2,598,633
<COMMON>                                        64,130
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     817,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,115,214
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               577,028
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  264,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             169,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                153,078
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            111,266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (13,126)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,140
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Ed JOYCE.

No. 383P98-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Robert Montgomery, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of July 2008 by Defendant for Reversal of Charges:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of February 2009."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17804]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4709]


Renewal of the Charter of the Advisory Committee on Cultural 
Diplomacy

    Summary: The Department of State announces that the charter of the 
Advisory Committee on Cultural Diplomacy has been renewed for an 
additional two-year period, to expire on August 31, 2007.
    The Department of State announces that the charter of the Advisory 
Committee on Cultural Diplomacy, established under Public Law 107-228, 
section 224, has been renewed for an additional two-year period. The 
charter will now expire on August 31, 2007.
    The Advisory Committee on Cultural Diplomacy was established to 
``advise the Secretary on programs and policies to advance the use of 
cultural diplomacy in United States foreign policy.''

    Dated: August 31, 2005.
Daniel Schuman,
Chief, Cultural Programs Division, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-17804 Filed 9-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
# CE2004088EN.01034902.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/349 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/349

---

(2004/C 88 E/0356)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1316/03

by Hanja Maij-Weggen (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(7 April 2003)

Subject:   Autonomy of the Indonesian province of Papua

Subject:

Is the Commission aware that in late January 2003 the Indonesian Government issued a decree stipulating that the process of dividing the province of Papua into three would be speeded up?

Can the Commission state how this self-explanatory decree can be reconciled with the earlier decision by the Indonesian Government to grant Papua special autonomy?

Can the Commission state what precise form this autonomy takes at present and what effect it has?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(15 May 2003)

(15 May 2003)

The Commission follows closely the developments in Eastern Indonesia, in particular the situation in Papua, and is very much aware of the Presidential Decree mentioned by the Honourable Member.

The Government of Indonesia at the provincial and national levels have started discussions on how to reconcile this decision to divide the province into three distinct provinces with the provisions of the Special Autonomy Law (SAL) passed by the Parliament in 2001. No final decision has however been made public so far.

The Commission refers the Honourable Member to the Council conclusions on Indonesia of 14 April 2003 stressing ‘the importance of full implementation of the letter and spirit of the SAL in Aceh and Papua’ and ‘the need for clarification of the relation between the SAL for Papua and the recent Presidential Decree’, and expressing ‘its concern on the delays on the Indonesian side in accepting international support for the implementation of the SAL’.

Since the SAL is awaiting implementation, it is not yet possible to give details on its precise form and effect.

The Community Delegation in Jakarta is monitoring the situation in co-ordination with the representatives of the Member States and will recommend possible actions when appropriate.

---
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 41/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 41/2014 of 17 January 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 41/2014                     

# of 17 January 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 January 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
#### Philip Orlando, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[798 NYS2d 911]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated June 7, 2004, as denied that branch of his motion which was for leave to renew those branches of his prior motion which were to strike the answer of the defendant City of New York, or, in the alternative, to compel certain disclosure from that defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A motion for leave to renew must be supported by new or additional facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination, and shall contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion *(see*CPLR 2221 [e]; *Jacobs v Sabo,*17 AD3d 321 [2005]). Here, the plaintiff failed to offer a reasonable justification as to why he did not submit the affidavit of the expert engineer in his original motion *(see Garcia v Pepe,*11 AD3d 654 [2004]), nor did he demonstrate that this new evidence would alter the Supreme Court’s prior determination *(see Greene v New York City Hous. Auth.,*283 AD2d 458 [2001]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for leave to renew.

The plaintiffs remaining contention is beyond the scope of our review *(see*CPLR 5515 [1]; *Matter of Haverstraw Vil. Policeman’s Benevolent Assn., Inc. v Town of Haverstraw,*15 AD3d 403 [2005]). H. Miller, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.