alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                  Financial Services Acquisition Corporation

               STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                 (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                For the Three  Months Ended
                                                                          March 31, 1997         March 31, 1996
                                                                          --------------         --------------
<S>                                                                        <C>                   <C>
  Average Weighted Common Shares Outstanding                                  8,949,656               8,949,656
  Primary Earnings Per Share                                               $       0.12           $         .39
</TABLE>


The Merger has been accounted for as a recapitalization of EBIC, with the
issuance of shares by EBIC for the net assets of the Company. The consolidated
results of operations and financial position of the Company for periods and
dates prior to the Merger are the consolidated historical results of operations
and financial position of EBIC and its subsidiaries and affiliates for such
periods and dates. Shares outstanding and related earnings per share information
for the three months ended March 31, 1996 have been presented as if all shares 
outstanding at March 31, 1997 had been issued and were outstanding for the
merged and recapitalized entity for the three months ended March 31, 1996.

                              Page 21 of 22 Pages
----

(2004/C 78 E/0845)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3238/03

by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(3 November 2003)

Subject:   New arrangements regarding maritime cabotage in Greece

According to the Greek press, with a view to the new maritime cabotage arrangements which enter into force on 1 January 2004 in Greece, the Commission and the Greek Ministry for the Merchant Maritime have decided to set up a joint committee to examine issues relating to the institutional framework in Greece and the transition to the new provisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 (1) for ending preferential arrangements in the coastal navigation sector. The Association of Coastal Shipowners wishes to form part of the committee with a view to supporting full liberalisation in this sector. The press reports go on to say that the issues under discussion include contracts for crew members of Greek coastal vessels, the knowledge of Greek required of Community seamen wishing to work in Greece and age limits for passenger and car ferries applicable in Greece.

Answer given by Ms de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(8 December 2003)

The Commission has been telling the Greek authorities for a long time that the law in force needs to be amended in order to be compatible with Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 (2), notably regarding the scope of public service, the rules on manning and the age requirement for vessels. The Regulation will be fully applicable from 1 January 2004.

The Commission never planned to set up a joint committee with the Greek authorities. It will take all the necessary measures, including infringement proceedings if necessary, to ensure that the Regulation is observed.

----

(1)OJ L 364, 12.12.1992, p. 7.

(2)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of 7 December 1992 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport within Member States, OJ L 364, 12.12.1992.

----
#### Vita Koubek, Respondent, v William G. Denis, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 746]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated June 21, 2004, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The 54-year-old plaintiff sustained personal injuries after she climbed onto a three-feet high trampoline located in the defendant’s backyard and fell onto the grass while attempting to stand.

Under the assumption of the risk doctrine, a defendant is relieved of liability for injuries to a party who participates in a sporting event or recreational activity where such party is aware of the risks inherent in such activity, has an appreciation of the nature of such risks, and voluntarily assumes those risks (see *Morgan v State of New York,*90 NY2d 471, 484 [1997]; *Lapinski v Hunter Mtn. Ski Bowl,*306 AD2d 320, 321 [2003]). The defendant established his prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by demonstrating that the plaintiff assumed the risk of using the subject trampoline (see *Liccione v Gearing, 252*AD2d 956 [1998]).

Since the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to the motion, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see *Lumley v Motts,*1 AD3d 573 [2003]; *Lapinski v Hunter Mtn. Ski Bowl, supra; Liccione v Gearing, supra).*Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Cozier and Lifson, JJ., concur.
In re ESTATE OF Daniel RAND. appealed by Petitioner.

No. 314P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Jimmy F. Gaylor, Jacksonville, for Melanie Shepard.

Thomas J. White, III, Kinston, for Linda Rand.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 645 S.E.2d 174.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of July 2007 by Petitioner (Melanie Shepard) this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of LIN Television
Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Gary
R. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, William A. Cunningham, Vice
President and Controller, Deborah R. Jacobson, Vice President of Corporate
Development and Treasurer, and Peter E. Maloney, Vice President of Finance, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 17, 2003                        /s/ Gary R. Chapman
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Gary R. Chapman
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 17, 2003                        /s/ William A. Cunningham
                                                --------------------------------
                                                William A. Cunningham
                                                Vice President and Controller



Dated: November 17, 2003                        /s/ Deborah R. Jacobson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Deborah R. Jacobson
                                                Vice President of Corporate
                                                Development and Treasurer



Dated: November 17, 2003                        /s/ Peter E. Maloney
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Peter E. Maloney
                                                Vice President of Finance
Exhibit 99.15
 CONSENT OF ANDREW S. TRIPP
   1.
    
    The technical report dated March 21, 2011, entitled Goldcorp Inc., Marlin Gold Operation,
Department of San Marcos, Guatemala, NI 43-101 Technical Report (the Marlin Report); and2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information
relating to the Marlin Report and the Marlin Mines, and the properties described therein.
  Date: March 31, 2011/s/ Andrew S. TrippName:
    Andrew S. Tripp, P. Eng.
# C_2023314EN.01000501.xml

| 4.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 8 June 2023 — LM BV v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

(Case C-354/23, Seberts (1))

(2023/C 314/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LM BV

Defendant: Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

Question referred

Are the European Union Guidelines for State Aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas 2014-2020 (2014/C 204/01) (2) and, in particular, paragraphs 135, 136 and 137 and point 144(a) thereof, to be interpreted as meaning that there is investment aid that serves to finance the costs of the construction, procurement or improvement of immovable property only if the grant beneficiary itself also is or is to become the owner of the immovable property to which the costs relate?

---

(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  OJ 2014 C 204, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   May-31-1999
<CASH>                                               41719
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      1184998
<ALLOWANCES>                                        105231
<INVENTORY>                                         575870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   2030460
<PP&E>                                             3559609
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1965501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     3989415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1835400
<BONDS>                                            1181853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         496236
<COMMON>                                             18762
<OTHER-SE>                                          354964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       3989415
<SALES>                                            4527624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   4527624
<CGS>                                              3002528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      3002528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1504969
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      3148
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  177682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (156739)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (156739)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (156739)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.14)



</TABLE>
Barbara SHUFORD, Employee, Plaintiff v. REGAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY-WORLDTEX, INC., Employer Crum & Foster, Carrier Wausau Insurance, Carrier, Defendants.

No. 100P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Lawrence J. Goldman, Charlotte, for Regal Mfg. Co., et al.

Randy D. Duncan, for Shuford.

Taurus E. Becton, Charlotte, for Wausau Ins. Co.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of March 2008 by Defendants (Regal Mfg. Co-Worldtex & Crum & Foster) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
# CE2004084EN.01072902.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/729 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/729

---

(2004/C 84 E/0821)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2376/03

by Lucio Manisco (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(16 July 2003)

Subject:   Al Sahri deported by Italy and executed in Syria

Subject:

On 23 November 2002 Mohamad Al Sahri, sentenced to death by the Syrian judiciary and in exile since 1983, arrived at the Milan airport of Malpensa and five days later the new Bossi-Fini law was carried out and he was deported to Syria against his will. On 9 July 2003 Christopher Hein, chairman of the Italian council for refugees, announced that Mr Al Shari had been executed in Syria on 28 February 2003. Defying credibility, Italian immigration authorities have stated that Mr Al Sahri, asked to choose between Jordan and Syria for his deportation, indicated his preference for the latter where he had been sentenced to death.

Does the Commission believe that the Italian government violated in this case not only its own national Constitution, but Article 19 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the spirit and the letter of all the directives followed by the EU on political asylum and against deporting foreign citizens to countries where they might be put to death?

What measures does the Commission intend to take against the Italian authorities for such a blatant violation of human rights and of the most basic legal and humanitarian principles of the European Union?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(4 September 2003)

(4 September 2003)

In accordance with Article 19(2) of the Charter of Human Rights of the European Union, ‘No one may be removed, expelled or extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to the death penalty, torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.’ This is one of the principles that are common to the Member States and that the Commission must respect in accordance with Article 6(1) of the Treaty on the European Union.

The Commission would recall its answer of 29 January 2003 to Questions P-3821/02 by Mrs Paciotti and P-3826/02 by Mr Di Lello Finuoli (1) concerning this case and the absence at this stage of powers to intervene in the examination of any infringement of Article 19 of the Charter, the reason being that no Community provisions exist on asylum procedures and on determination of the need for international protection and the relevant statutes. The draft directives on these two matters are still being examined within the Council.

1

The Commission would also recall that interested parties may bring a case before the European Court of Human Rights in accordance with the procedures laid down in the Court's Rules if they consider that provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights have not been complied with.

---

(1)  See page 707.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ERPOperating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Neithercut, Chief FinancialOfficer of Equity Residential, general partner of ERPOP, certify, pursuant to18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP .

 

 
| /s/                         | David J. Neithercut |   |
|-----------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| David J.  Neithercut        |
| Chief  Financial Officer of |
| Equity  Residential         |
| August 13,  2003            |

 

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to ERPOP and will be retained byERPOP and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.**

** **

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         609,526
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,768,531
<PP&E>                                      17,029,975
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,177,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,166,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,370,718
<BONDS>                                      2,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,285,110
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,196,118)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,166,916
<SALES>                                      9,307,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,307,351
<CGS>                                        4,409,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,297,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,351,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,326,642)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,328,242)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,328,242)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.37)
        

</TABLE>
IN RE W.L.

No. COA07-1104.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 5, 2008.

Certification Date February 25, 2008.

Appeal from Cumberland (05JT145, 98JT8, 98JT9).

Cases reported without published opinion. Vacated.
Bruce D. TAYLOR, Employee v. HOWARD TRANSPORTATION, INC., Employer Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Carrier.

No. 191P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Neil P. Andrews, Charlotte, for Howard Transportation, Inc., et al.

M. Duane Jones, Charlotte.

W. Phillip Moseley, Burlington, for Taylor, Bruce D.

M. Duane Jones, Charlotte, for Howard Transportation, Inc., et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of June 2015 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
Exhibit 13.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Of 2002



Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer
of Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anonimabursatil de capital variableunder the laws of Mexico (the “Company”), does hereby certify that,
to the best of such officer’s knowledge:



| | 1. | The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F for
                                         the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies
                                         with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                                         1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                                         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 28, 2017



| | By: | /s/ Rodolfo Ramos Arvizu
| | --- | ------------------------
| |     | Rodolfo Ramos Arvizu    
| |     | Chief Executive Officer 



April 28, 2017



| | By: | /s/ Daniel Salazar Ferrer
| | --- | -------------------------
| |     | Daniel Salazar Ferrer    
| |     | Chief Financial Officer  



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and will be retained by Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the    Registration Statements on    Forms S-3    (Nos.    333-86842,333-68283    and    333-135210)    and    Form S-8(No. 333-100214)    of AMB Property, L.P. and    Forms S-8    (Nos.    333-42015,333-78779,333-90042,333-100214    and    333-144489)    of AMB Property Corporation of our report dated    February 28, 2007 relating to the financial statements,    financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of    the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting    and the effectiveness of internal control over financial    reporting of AMB Property, L.P. and our report dated    February 12, 2007, relating to the financial statements of    AMB Japan Fund I, L.P., which appear in this    Form 10-K/A.     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    San Francisco, California    October 25, 2007
STATE of North Carolina v. Jalen Dashawn GILMORE and Danarius Shyheim Shealey.

No. COA15-193.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Dec. 1, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.