alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 65 E/204)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2673/03

by Georges Berthu (NI) to the Commission

(2 September 2003)

Subject:   VAT on repairs to old buildings

The trial period during which Member States may charge a lower VAT rate for highly labour-intensive services, including repair work on old buildings, is due to expire on 31 December 2003.

Given the current economic woes, and especially the rise in the Union's average unemployment rate, there are strong reasons to make the experiment an established practice. Competition among Member States has, moreover, hardly been distorted, because the type of services in question, which are essentially of a local nature, are difficult to relocate.

Can the Commission say whether, as seems desirable, it will submit a proposal at the end of the year whereby Member States would be authorised on a permanent basis to charge the lower VAT rate for building repairs?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(25 September 2003)

The Commission adopted a proposal for a Directive on reduced VAT rates (1) on 23 July this year proposing that Member States be allowed to apply a reduced rate to the supply, construction, conversion, renovation, repair, maintenance or cleaning of private dwellings. Consequently, a reduced rate can continue to be applied to the repair of old buildings provided they are used as private dwellings.

The optional nature of these reduced rates has never been called into question and Member States are free to decide on the sectors to which they wish to apply these rates.

After Parliament has given its opinion the Council will have to decide by unanimity on the future scope of reduced VAT rates.

----

(1)  COM(2003) 397 final.

----
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 56 

To provide relief to the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for settlement of 

certain claims against the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for Mr. INOUYE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide relief to the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for 

settlement of certain claims against the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SETTLEMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIMS. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT.—Notwith5 standing any other provision of law, subject to subsection 

6 (b), the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay to the 

7 Pottawatomi Nation in Canada $1,830,000 from amounts 

8 appropriated under section 1304 of title 31, United States 

9 Code. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 56 IS

1 (b) PAYMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION

2 FOR RECOMMENDATION OF SETTLEMENT.—The payment 

3 under subsection (a) shall— 

4 (1) be made in accordance with the terms and 

5 conditions of the Stipulation for Recommendation of 

6 Settlement dated May 22, 2000, entered into be7 tween the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada and the 

8 United States (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Stipu9 lation for Recommendation of Settlement’’); and 

10 (2) be included in the report of the Chief Judge 

11 of the United States Court of Federal Claims re12 garding Congressional Reference No. 94–1037X, 

13 submitted to the Senate on January 4, 2001, in ac14 cordance with sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, 

15 United States Code. 

16 (c) FULL SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.—The payment 

17 under subsection (a) shall be in full satisfaction of all 

18 claims of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada against the 

19 United States that are referred to or described in the Stip20 ulation for Recommendation of Settlement. 

21 (d) NONAPPLICABILITY.—Notwithstanding any other 

22 provision of law, the Indian Tribal Judgment Funds Use 

23 or Distribution Act (25 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) does not 

24 apply to the payment under subsection (a). 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Towers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date: April 14, 2004                    By: /s/ Robert Sandburg
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Name: Robert Sandburg
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Alliance Towers, Inc.
and will be retained by Alliance Towers, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Alex Sanango v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-16-00056-CR

Trial court case number: 1947076

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 6 of Harris County

The court reporter notified the Court that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for 

the record. Our records indicate that the appellant is not appealing as an indigent. 

We may consider an appeal without a reporter’s record if no reporter’s record is filed due 

to appellant’s fault. Rule 37.3(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

If No Reporter’s Record Filed Due to Appellant’s Fault. Under the following 

circumstances, and if the clerk’s record has been filed, the appellate court may —

after first giving the appellant notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure —

consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record 

for a decision. The court may do this if no reporter’s record has been filed 

because:

(1) the appellant failed to request a reporter’s record; or

(2) (A) appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the 

reporter’s fee to prepare the reporter’s record; and

(B) the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of 

costs.

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

We notified appellant on February 16, 2016, that this appeal might be considered without 

a reporter’s record unless on or before March 17, 2016, the appellant (1) caused the record to be 

filed in this Court by paying for the record, (2) filed proof that he made arrangements to pay the 
reporter’s fee to prepare the reporter’s record or (3) filed proof that he was entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs. Appellant did not respond.

Accordingly, we order appellant’s brief to be filed on or before April 21, 2016.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebecca Huddle

 Acting individually 

Date: April 5, 2016
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 982/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 982/2014 of 17 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 982/2014                     

# of 17 September 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 September 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. MAY.

No. COA08-146.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 2, 2008.

Certification Date December 22, 2008.

Appeal from Beaufort (05CRS50155, 05CRS50268).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part; reversed in part and remanded.
# CE2004084EN.01001402.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/14

---

(2004/C 84 E/0015)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2141/03

by Olle Schmidt (ELDR) to the Commission

(26 June 2003)

Subject:   German road tolls

Subject:

Germany is introducing a motorway toll of SEK 11,45 per ten kilometres for heavy goods vehicles from 1 September 2003. This toll will affect Sweden and Denmark in that it puts them in a worse competitive position than other European countries.

The toll is obviously contrary to EU competition rules. What steps will the Commission take to find a solution to this problem?

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 659 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 659

 To amend section 1477 of title 10, United States Code, to provide for 
the payment of the death gratuity with respect to members of the Armed 
  Forces without a surviving spouse who are survived by a minor child.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2007

   Mr. Hagel introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 1477 of title 10, United States Code, to provide for 
the payment of the death gratuity with respect to members of the Armed 
  Forces without a surviving spouse who are survived by a minor child.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF DEATH GRATUITY WITH RESPECT TO MEMBERS OF THE 
              ARMED FORCES WITHOUT A SURVIVING SPOUSE WHO ARE SURVIVED 
              BY A MINOR CHILD.

    Section 1477 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``, subject to 
        subsection (d),'' after ``shall be paid'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new 
        subsection (d):
    ``(d)(1) In the case of a person covered by section 1475 or 1476 of 
this title who has no surviving spouse, but who has one or more 
surviving children (as prescribed by subsection (b)) under the age of 
18 years who, after the death of the person, will be in the custody of 
a parent (as prescribed by subsection (c)) or brother or sister (as 
prescribed by subsection (a)) of the person, the death gratuity shall 
be paid to such parent, brother, or sister as designated by the person, 
whether in the full amount payable under section 1478 of this title or 
in such portion of such amount as the person shall specify.
    ``(2) If the amount of the death gratuity specified for payment 
under paragraph (1) is less than the full amount of the death gratuity 
payable under section 1478 of this title, the balance of the amount of 
the death gratuity shall be paid to or for the living survivors of the 
person concerned in accordance with paragraphs (2) through (5) of 
subsection (a).
    ``(3) An individual designated for the payment of death gratuity 
under paragraph (1) shall be treated as an eligible survivor for 
purposes of subsection (e).''.
                                 <all>
```
NUTTALL v. HORNWOOD, INC.

No. COA08-395.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 6, 2009.

Certification Date January 26, 2009.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 531947).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Neil Christiansen, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and



c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





September 21, 2005

/s/ Neil Christiansen

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
----

(2004/C 33 E/070)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0732/03

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Commission

(11 March 2003)

Subject:   Guinea-Bissau: human rights

Recently there has been a spate of reports that trade unionists, human rights activists, leaders of opposition parties and those of various associations have been arrested in Guinea-Bissau. These reports come on top of others of severe restrictions on freedom of expression (RTP-Africa delegation, local radio stations and other media), and on other fundamental rights, making the gloomy overall picture of the economic, financial, social and political situation prevailing in Guinea-Bissau even blacker. Now, to complete this picture of general collapse, comes the news that the legislative elections originally scheduled for April will probably be postponed, on the grounds that the requisite funding simply cannot be found.

How has the Commission monitored the on-going deterioration of the situation in Guinea-Bissau and what measures has it taken, in particular with regard to protecting human rights and putting an end to political persecution there? Does the Commission believe that the EU could provide funding for the electoral process, and thus help to ensure democratic developments in Guinea-Bissau? What other measures does the Commission intend to take, either on its own or in cooperation with other countries and international organisations, with a view to promoting Guinea-Bissau's return to democratic normality?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(9 April 2003)

Within the context of its political dialogue with the authorities of Guinea- Bissau, the Commission closely follows, in a permanent and regular way, the on-going deterioration of the situation as described by the Honourable Member. A political dialogue encompassing a regular assessment of developments concerning respect for human rights is provided for in article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement.

The Commission is willing to consider requests for financial support to the electoral process.

The Commission will continue to participate in a political dialogue with the authorities of Guinea-Bissau, which may be intensified depending on the evolution of the situation.

----
EXHIBIT 23

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As  independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the  incorporation
of  our  report  dated  March  24,  1998,  on  the  consolidated  financial
statements  of R&B Falcon Corporation and subsidiaries as of  December  31,
1997  and  1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996  and  1995
included   in   this  Form  10-K,  into  the  Company's  previously   filed
Registration Statement (file no. 333-43475).

/s/Arthur Andersen LLP

Houston, Texas
March 30, 1998
James M. CLONTZ, Employee v. HOLLAR & GREENE PRODUCE COMPANY, Employer and Travelers Insurance Company, Carrier.

No. 193P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Martha Brown, Greensboro, for Clontz.

Sharon E. Dent, Charlotte, for Produce Co., et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of April 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
exv4w1





Exhibit 4.1








	STOCK CERTIFICATE CUSIP 765758 20 6







 









 








     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	TEN COM

	 	- as tenants in common
	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -
	 	 	 	Custodian	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TEN ENT

	 	- as tenants by the entireties
	 	 	(Cust)	 	(Minor)
	JT TEN	 	-  as joint tenants with right of
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	survivorship and not as tenants
	 	 	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
	 	 	in common
	 	 	 	Act	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	(State)






Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.




For Value Received, _____________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto






PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE





 

 























	 

	 
(PLEASE
PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)



 



 








	 

	 	Shares
	of the stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint






	 	 	 

	 


	 	Attorney
	to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.





Dated 
 





 





NOTICE:
THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE
FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.








 




THE SIGNATURE TO THE ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND TO THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS
CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER, AND
MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A COMMERCIAL BANK OR TRUST COMPANY OR A MEMBER FIRM OF A NATIONAL OR REGIONAL
OR OTHER RECOGNIZED STOCK EXCHANGE IN CONFORMANCE WITH A SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM.



 


COLUMBIA FINANCIAL PRINTING CORP. — www.stockinformation.com
Exhibit 10.38

FULL RECOURSE  SECURED  PROMISSORY NOTE

|$175,000.00 |  | August 21, 2001
Walnut Creek, California
|----------- |  | ----------------------------------------

FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged hereby, Laura B. DePole ("Maker"), an individual, promises to pay Tier
Technologies, Inc., a California corporation ("Holder"), or order, at 1350 Treat Boulevard, Suite 250, Walnut Creek, California or such other
place as Holder may from time to time designate, in lawful money of the United States, the principal sum of one hundred seventy -five thousand dollars ($175,000.00), as set forth below.





1

---







| |           | Maker: |         | /s/ Laura B. DePoleLaura B. DePole  
| | --------- | ------ | ------- | ------------------------------------
| | APPROVED: |        | Holder: |                                     
| |           | By:    |         | Jim Bildner, CEOPrint Name and Title

2

---

QuickLinks