alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 

          - 27 CFR Parts 4, 24, and 27 
          - [Re: Notice No. 51] 
          - RIN 1513-AB00 

# AGENCY:

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        On August 24, 2005, TTB published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the                         **Federal Register**                         regarding the certification requirements for imported natural wine. We also published a temporary rule on the same subject in the same issue. In that notice of proposed rulemaking, a cross reference contains an incorrect CFR section number. This document corrects that error.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gail Davis, International Trade Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, telephone 202-927-8110. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 24, 2005, TTB published a notice of proposed rulemaking, Notice No. 51, in the                     **Federal Register**                     entitled “Certification Requirements for Imported Natural Wine” (70 FR 49516). Notice No. 51 was cross-referenced to a temporary rule on the same subject, which was published in the same issue as T.D. TTB-31 (70 FR 49479). Notice No. 51 contains a cross reference with an incorrect CFR section number.                 

                    Therefore, in the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 24, 2005, on page 49518, in the first column, in paragraph number (7), the cross-reference instruction should read as follows:                 

                    [The text of proposed § 27.140 is the same as the text of § 27.140 as set forth in the temporary rule published elsewhere in this issue of the                     **Federal Register**                    .]                 

Dated: June 1, 2005. 

Francis W. Foote, 

Director, Regulations and Rulings Division. 

[FR Doc. 05-17756 Filed 9-7-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
GEORGE v. GEORGE.

No. COA07-66.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from New Hanover (03CVD2851).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part and vacated and Remanded in Part.
----

(2004/C 33 E/248)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2268/03

by Giorgio Celli (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(3 July 2003)

Subject:   Heavy metal traces in wild mushrooms

There has been a substantial increase in recent years, in Italy and elsewhere, in the marketing and consumption of edible wild mushrooms. According to data supplied by AIIPA (1) in 1998, Italy imports some 20 000 tonnes per annum of non-cultivated mushrooms (fresh, dry, frozen, canned, etc.), of which almost half belong to the Boletus edulis group (B. aereus, B. aestivalis, B. edulis, B. pinophilus). These latter originate mostly in Europe, but growing quantities are now coming from Africa (especially South Africa), China and Central America. In Italy, there are approximately 1000 businesses operating in the import, processing and distribution sectors.

Regulation (EC) No 466/2001, published in the Official Journal of the European Communities on 16 March 2001 (2) and based on the opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF), lays down the admissible thresholds for certain pollutants in food products, including cultivated mushrooms. The threshold for all cultivated mushrooms is 0,2 mg/kg (fresh weight) for cadmium and 0,3 mg/kg (fresh weight) for lead.

Is the Commission aware that no such thresholds for wild mushrooms exist in Community law?

What measures will the Commission take concerning cadmium and lead thresholds for wild mushrooms, given that studies by authoritative researchers have revealed dangerous levels of those metals in wild mushrooms that are freely marketed in the EU? (3)

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(31 July 2003)

Legislation on contaminants in food sets maximum levels for lead and cadmium in all cultivated mushrooms. Wild mushrooms are presently not covered because, at the time these levels were set, no data were available to indicate that the dietary intake of lead and cadmium from wild mushrooms was a concern for public health.

The Member States have recently gathered new data on levels of lead and cadmium in different foods. It is expected that the report will be finalised before the end of 2003. This report will be used for the review of maximum levels for lead and cadmium in foods.

----

(1)  The Italian Association of Food-Producing Companies — circular dated 20 April 1999 addressed to the member companies on ‘Italy's external trade in mushrooms in 1998’ (Milan).

(2)OJ L 77, 16.3.2001, p. 1.

(3)  L. Cocchi et al., 2001 — ‘Metalli pesanti e isotopi radioattivi nei funghi: aspetti igienico-sanitari’ (‘Heavy metals and radioactive isotopes in mushrooms: health and hygiene aspects’, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Mycotoxicology, Viterbo, 6-7 December 2001 — Associazione Micologica Bresadola — Centro Studi Micologici, 2002, 17:73-91.

----
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

VASCO Data Security International, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-62829), Form S-3 (333-108793), and on Form S-1 (333-124458) of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 13, 2009, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports areincluded in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 13, 2009
SCWC-18-0000883

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JOHN R. SILVA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000883; CASE NO. 1PC161000733)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ 

of Certiorari, filed on February 24, 2020, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 22, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000883

22-APR-2020

08:02 AM
Exhibit 13.1





Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Industrias Bachoco,
S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad
anónimabursatilde capital variableunder the laws of México (the “Company”), does
hereby certify that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge:





1.
            The
      accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended
      December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.




June 30,
2009





By:
              /s/Cristóbal Mondragón
      FragosoCristóbal
      Mondragón FragosoChief
      Executive Officer





June 30,
2009





By:
              /s/Daniel Salazar
      FerrerDaniel
      Salazar FerrerChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and will be retained by
Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. Juli Ann WILLIAMS.

No. 173P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 24, 2015.

Ms. Charlotte G. Blake, Jefferson, for Williams, Juli Ann.

Ms. Harriet F. Worley, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

*318Ms. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of May 2015 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:
PVC, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff v. McKIM & CREED, P.A., f/k/a McKim & Creed Engineers, P.A., a Corporation; and S & ME, Inc., a Corporation, Defendants S & ME, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff v. Cable Concrete Structures, Inc. d/b/a PTI; and Rebarco, Inc., Third-Party Defendants.

No. 142P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Robert White Johnson, Anna J. Averitt, Wilmington, for S & ME.

William W. Pollock, Raleigh, for Cable Concrete Structures.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of April 2008 by Third-Party Plaintiff (S & ME) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 630 

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a minimum payment rate by Medicare Advantage organizations for 

services furnished by a critical access hospital and a rural health clinic 

under the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Mr. COLEMAN (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act 

to provide for a minimum payment rate by Medicare 

Advantage organizations for services furnished by a critical access hospital and a rural health clinic under the 

Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Health Services 

5 Preservation Act of 2007’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 630 IS

1 SEC. 2. MINIMUM PAYMENT RATE BY MEDICARE ADVAN2 TAGE ORGANIZATIONS FOR SERVICES FUR3 NISHED BY A CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL 

4 AND A RURAL HEALTH CLINIC. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1857(e) of the Social Se6 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–27(e)) is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(4) MINIMUM PAYMENT RATE FOR SERVICES

9 FURNISHED BY A CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL AND

10 A RURAL HEALTH CLINIC.—A contract under this 

11 section between an MA organization and the Sec12 retary for the offering of an MA plan shall require 

13 the organization to provide for a payment rate under 

14 the plan for inpatient and outpatient critical access 

15 hospital services and rural health clinic services fur16 nished to enrollees of the plan and for extended care 

17 services furnished by a critical access hospital under 

18 an agreement entered into under section 1883 to 

19 such enrollees (whether or not the services are fur20 nished pursuant to an agreement between such orga21 nization and a critical access hospital or a rural 

22 health clinic) that is not less than— 

23 ‘‘(A) the applicable payment rate estab24 lished under part A or part B (which includes 

25 the payment of an interim rate and a subse26 quent cost reconciliation) with respect to the 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•S 630 IS

1 critical access hospital for such inpatient, out2 patient, and extended care services or the rural 

3 health clinic for such rural health clinic serv4 ices; or 

5 ‘‘(B) if the critical access hospital or the 

6 rural health clinic determines appropriate, 103 

7 percent of the applicable interim payment rate 

8 established under part A or part B with respect 

9 to the critical access hospital for such inpatient, 

10 outpatient, and extended care services or the 

11 rural health clinic for such rural health clinic 

12 services.’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to Medicare Advantage contract 

15 years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
STATE v. HATCHER.

No. COA08-162.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Johnston (06CRS11375, 06CRS52026, 06CRS52032).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to March 22, 2022 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :

A

- 21

- 562 In re Interest of A ’ Nessty C. et al.

A

- 21

- 567 State v. Smith

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.
Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c cales/

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ROBERT W. MILLER

, §

§ No. 546

, 201 7

Petitioner Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below : Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. N17M

- 11

- 154

KOLAWOLE O. AKINBAYO, §

WARDEN, H.R.Y.C.I, §

§

Respondent Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: March 16 , 201 8

Decided: May 21 , 201 8

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN

, Justices

O R D E R

(1) The appellant, Robert W. Miller, filed this appeal from the Superior

Court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. T he appellee, State of

Delaware

, has moved to affirm the Superior Court ’s judgment on the ground that it

is manifest on the face of Miller’s opening brief that the appeal is without merit.

(2) In 2015, Miller pleaded guilty to a felony offense and was sentenced to

eight years of Level V incarceration followed by six months of Level IV

supervision. 1 W e affirmed Miller’s conviction and sentence on direct appeal

. 2

1 State v. Miller , Del. Super., Cr. ID No. 1412002671 (N).

2 Miller v. State , 2016 WL 3410306 (Del. May 18, 2016).2

Thereafter, we dismissed Miller’s appeal from the denial of his first motion for

postconviction relief. 3 Miller did not appeal the denial of his second postconviction

motion.

( 3 ) On November 22, 2017, Miller filed a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus and a supporting memorandum

. By order dated November 27, 2017 the

Superior Court denied the petition after determining that Miller ’s commitment was

regular on its face

, and that he was not being illegally detained. This appeal

followed.

( 4 ) When a prisoner’s commitment is regular on its face, there can be no

relief through habeas corpus. 4 Miller pleaded guilty to a felony offense ; his

commitment to serve a sentence for th e conviction is valid on its face

. Because

Miller is being held under a va lid commitment, the Superior Court correctly

determined that his petition and supporting memorandum did not support the

issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to affirm is

GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

3 Miller v. State , 2017 WL 568362 (Del. Feb. 9, 2017).

4 Hall v. Carr

, 6 92 A.2d 888, 891 (Del. 1997) (quoting 10 Del. C. § 6902(1)).
Grant of Extension of Time

 PAGE 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0269

IN THE MATTER OF 

C.R.G. and E.J.G.,

Youths in Need of Care

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing therefore, Appellant, K.E.T., is granted an extension 

of time until September 9, 2021 to prepare, serve, and file the Opening Brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 20 2021

07/20/2021
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RAIT Financial Trust (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack E. Salmon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |                        
|------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|              |  |  |  | /s/ Jack E. Salmon     
|              |  |  |  | Jack E. Salmon         
|March 1, 2007 |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
KIRBY, et al. v. NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 56PA14-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 2, 2015.

Matthew H. Bryant, Winston-Salem, for Kirby, Everette E., et al.

Dahr Joseph Tanoury, Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Department of Transportation.

John F. Oates, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Department of Transportation.

John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, for North Carolina Department of Transportation.

T. Paul Hendrick, Winston-Salem, for Kirby, Everette E., et al.

Kenneth C. Otis, III, Winston-Salem, for Kirby, Everette E., et al.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 2nd of September 2015 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd of September 2015."
4th Amendment to the Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan



  
 Exhibit 4(j)

 FOURTH AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 DIRECTORS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 Background Information

  

	A.	State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company and its affiliates (collectively, the “State Auto Companies”) previously adopted and maintain the State Auto
Insurance Companies Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of its members and their Boards of Directors. 


 

	B.	The State Auto Companies now desire to amend the Plan to add State Auto Financial Corporation (“STFC”) stock as an investment option under the Plan for
participants who are directors of STFC or its subsidiaries. 

  

	C.	Section B. of Article V of the Plan permits the amendment of the Plan at any time. 


Amendment of the Plan 
 The Plan is hereby amended effective November 1, 2010, as follows: 
  

	1.	The next to the last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


The total number of STFC Shares that may be made available as an investment option under this Plan for the purpose of all eligible
participant accounts is 60,000. 
  

	2.	The last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


Effective December 1, 2005, the Plan shall no longer permit investments in STFC Shares or Phantom Stock Units; provided, however,
that effective November 1, 2010, the Plan shall again permit investments in STFC Shares for participants who are directors of STFC or its subsidiaries. 
  

	3.	The last sentence of the sixth paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety. 


 

	4.	All other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

  

			
	STATE AUTO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James A. Yano

		
	Its:	 	 Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

		
	Date:	 	 November 9, 2010


 (additional signatures on next page) 







  

			
	STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James A. Yano

		
	Its:	 	 Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

		
	Date:	 	 November 9, 2010



 

			
	STATE AUTO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James A. Yano

		
	Its:	 	 Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

		
	Date:	 	 November 9, 2010