alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          83,288
<SECURITIES>                                24,904,985
<RECEIVABLES>                                  591,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,265
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,586,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          598,159
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,988,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,586,769
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               745,945
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                686,765
<INCOME-TAX>                                   686,765
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            686,765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   686,765
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Pinnacle Resources, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
report on Form 10-K for the years ended June 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ Glen R. Gamble
                                  ------------------------
                                  Glen R. Gamble
                                  Chief Executive Officer

February 13, 2009
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

September 13, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00620

- CV

Andrew CONTRERAS and Martha Ann Contreras ,

Appellant s

v. DREAM HOME RENOVATORS, LLC,

Appellee
From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CV

- 06354 Honorable J Frank Davis, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R
On September 12, 2019, Appellants filed an opposed motion to review the supersedeas bond amount and an emergency motion to stay execution of a final judgment in a detainer case. No clerk’s record has been filed in this appeal. The documents provided by Appellants show that the trial court signed a final judgment on August 30, 2019, which set the supersedeas bond amount at $12,000.00 , and on September 11, 2019, Appellants filed an affidavit from Andrew Contreras stating that he cannot find a surety as req uired and he does not have cash to post in lieu of a bond.

“ A judgment of a county court may not under any circumstances be stayed pending appeal unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas bond in an amount set by the county court. ” T EX

. P ROP

. C ODE A NN

. § 24.007 ; accord Marshall v. Hous ing . Auth. of City of San Antonio , 198 S.W.3d 782, 786 (Tex. 2006)

. As a prerequisite to a stay, Appellants were required to post a bond for $12,000.00 not later than September 9, 2019. See T EX

. P ROP

. C ODE A NN

. § 24.07 ; Marshall , 198 S.W.3d at 786

. Appellants have not provided any evidence to show that they posted a $12,000.00 bond on or before September 9, 2019. Appellants’ emergency motion to stay execution is DENIED. See T EX

. P ROP

. C ODE A NN

. § 24.07; Marshall , 198 S.W.3d at 786

.Although w e may review a trial court’s ruling on the amount of a supersedeas bond, see

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 24.4(a), we have no record before us of a hearing on any Appellants’ motion to reduce the amount of the bond to avoid substantial economic harm to Appellants, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 24.2(b). Appellants’ motion to review the amount of the supersedeas bond is DENIED.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court
STATE of North Carolina v. Jonathon Lavon FRIEND El.

No. 345P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th of October 2015 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Forsyth County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DAVID B. HOWE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-592 ) U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as ) Trustee for SG Mortgage Securities Trust ) 2006-FRE2, Asset Backed Certificates, ) Series 2006-FRE2; GARY W. NASH, as ) Trustee of the Remar Trust 207017601; ) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ) ) Appellees. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed December 6, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little, Senior Judge. David B. Howe, pro se. Shannon Troutman of Albertelli Law, Tampa, for Appellee U.S. Bank National Association. No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.- 2 -

SILBERMAN, BADALAMENTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
II 

Calendar No. 226 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 686 

[Report No. 110–96] 

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the WashingtonRochambeau Revolutionary Route National Historic Trail. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2007 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Mr. WARNER, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. REED, Mr. 

BIDEN, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. DODD, and Mr. SPECTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JUNE 26, 2007 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the 

Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route National 

Historic Trail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 686 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington-Rocham3 beau Revolutionary Route National Historic Trail Des4 ignation Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ADDITION TO NATIONAL SCENIC AND NATIONAL 

6 HISTORIC TRAILS. 

7 Section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(26) WASHINGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLU11 TIONARY ROUTE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.— 

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Washington-Ro13 chambeau Revolutionary Route National His14 toric Trail, a corridor of approximately 600 

15 miles following the route taken by the armies of 

16 General George Washington and Count Ro17 chambeau between Newport, Rhode Island, and 

18 Yorktown, Virginia, in 1781 and 1782, as gen19 erally depicted on the map entitled ‘WASH20 INGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLU21 TIONARY ROUTE NATIONAL HISTORIC 

22 TRAIL’, numbered T01/80,000, and dated July 

23 2006. 

24 ‘‘(B) MAP.—The map referred to in sub25 paragraph (A) shall be on file and available for 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•S 686 RS

1 public inspection in the appropriate offices of 

2 the National Park Service. 

3 ‘‘(C) ADMINISTRATION.—The trail shall be 

4 administered by the Secretary of the Interior, 

5 in consultation with— 

6 ‘‘(i) other Federal, State, tribal, re7 gional, and local agencies; and 

8 ‘‘(ii) the private sector. 

9 ‘‘(D) LAND ACQUISITION.—The United 

10 States shall not acquire for the trail any land 

11 or interest in land outside the exterior boundary 

12 of any federally-managed area without the con13 sent of the owner of the land or interest in 

14 land.’’. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
Calendar No. 226 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 686 

[Report No. 110

–96] 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to destionary Route National Historic Trail. ignate the Washington-Rochambeau RevoluJUNE 26, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
# Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/665Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/665 of 21 April 2015 on the acceptance of third States' contributions            to the European Union CSDP Military Advisory Mission in the Central African Republic (EUMAM RCA) (EUMAM RCA/2/2015)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/665                     

# of 21 April 2015

# on the acceptance of third States' contributions to the European Union CSDP Military Advisory Mission in the Central African                        Republic (EUMAM RCA) (EUMAM RCA/2/2015)                     

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/78 of 19 January 2015 on a European Union CSDP Military Advisory Mission in                           the Central African Republic (EUMAM RCA)(1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2015/78, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to                              take the relevant decisions on the acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States.

(2)Following a recommendation on the contribution offers of the Republic of Moldova ('Moldova') and Georgia by the EU Mission                              Commander of EUMAM RCA and the advice from the European Union Military Committee, those offers should be accepted.

(3)In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to                              the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation                              of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

1.The contribution offers of Moldova and Georgia to the European Union CSDP Military Advisory Mission in the Central African                        Republic (EUMAM RCA) are accepted and are considered to be significant.                  

2.Moldova and Georgia are exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUMAM RCA.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 21 April 2015.

*For the Political and Security Committee*                            

*The Chairperson*                            

W. Stevens                            

1

OJ L 13, 20.1.2015, p. 8.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OraLabs Holding Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Emile
Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS.
1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Emile Jordan
-------------------------------------
Emile Jordan, Chief Financial Officer



Dated: May 26, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of LIN
TV Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Gary R.
Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, William A. Cunningham, Vice
President and Controller, Deborah R. Jacobson, Vice President of Corporate
Development and Treasurer, and Peter E. Maloney, Vice President of Finance, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

         Dated: November 17, 2003  /s/ Gary R. Chapman
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                   Gary R. Chapman
                                   Chief Executive Officer

         Dated: November 17, 2003  /s/ William A. Cunningham
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                   William A. Cunningham
                                   Vice President and Controller

         Dated: November 17, 2003  /s/ Deborah R. Jacobson
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Deborah R. Jacobson
                                   Vice President of Corporate Development and
                                   Treasurer

         Dated: November 17, 2003  /s/ Peter E. Maloney
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Peter E. Maloney
                                   Vice President of Finance
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 174 (Friday, September 9, 2005)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 53719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18037]



[[Page 53717]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Proclamation 7922--Death of William H. Rehnquist



Proclamation 7923--Honoring the Memory of the Victims of Hurricane 
Katrina


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 174 / Friday, September 9, 2005 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 53719]]

                Proclamation 7922 of September 4, 2005

                
Death of William H. Rehnquist

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                As a mark of respect for William H. Rehnquist, Chief 
                Justice of the United States, I hereby order, by the 
                authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of 
                the United States of America, including section 7 of 
                title 4, United States Code, that the flag of the 
                United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White 
                House and on all public buildings and grounds, at all 
                military posts and naval stations, and on all naval 
                vessels of the Federal Government in the District of 
                Columbia and throughout the United States and its 
                Territories and possessions until sunset, Tuesday, 
                September 13, 2005. I also direct that the flag shall 
                be flown at half-staff for the same period at all 
                United States embassies, legations, consular offices, 
                and other facilities abroad, including all military 
                facilities and naval vessels and stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                fourth day of September, in the year of our Lord two 
                thousand five, and of the Independence of the United 
                States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

[FR Doc. 05-18037
Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Stratus      Services Group, Inc.**

| 1.     | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | the                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| Dated:                February 3, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Michael A. Maltzman                      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   | Michael                A. Maltzman                          |
|                                   |   | Chief                Financial Officer                      |
|                                   |   | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) |
In the Matter of the Foreclosure by Philip A. GLASS, Substitute Trustee, of a Deed of Trust Executed by Richard Phillip Brittain, dated June 29, 2006 and recorded in Book 180 at Page 755, of the Henderson County Public Registry.

No. 185P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Charles R. Brewer, Asheville, for Brittain, Richard Phillip.

Amy Purwin Hunt, Charlotte, for Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd of June 2015 by Respondent in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# C_2023304EN.01000202.xml

| 28.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña (Spain) lodged on 24 March 2023 — CL and Others v DB, sole successor to FC, and Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA)

(Case C-196/23)

(2023/C 304/03)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: CL and Others

Defendant: DB, sole successor to FC, and Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA)

Questions referred

| 1. | Is legislation such as the Spanish legislation (1) (Article 49(1)(e) of Real Decreto Legislativo 2/2015 por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley del Estatuto de los Trabajadores (Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015 approving the consolidated text of the Law on the Workers’ Statute) of 23 October 2015), which does not establish a period of consultation in situations where contracts of employment in excess of the number laid down in Article 1 of that directive are terminated as a result of the retirement of the natural person employer, compatible with Article 2 of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is legislation such as the Spanish legislation (1) (Article 49(1)(e) of Real Decreto Legislativo 2/2015 por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley del Estatuto de los Trabajadores (Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015 approving the consolidated text of the Law on the Workers’ Statute) of 23 October 2015), which does not establish a period of consultation in situations where contracts of employment in excess of the number laid down in Article 1 of that directive are terminated as a result of the retirement of the natural person employer, compatible with Article 2 of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies?

| 2. | If the answer to the preceding question is in the negative, does Directive 98/59 have direct horizontal effect between individuals? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the preceding question is in the negative, does Directive 98/59 have direct horizontal effect between individuals?

---

(1)  OJ 1998 L 225. p. 16.

---
STATE v. Barney Adrian DUNLAP.

No. 79P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

C. Norman Young, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Barney Adrian Dunlap, Marion, for Dunlap, Barney Adrian.

James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion***67The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd of February 2015 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."