alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTIAN ALBERTO MARTINEZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00130-CR

Appeal from

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2011D01837)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. 

Further, this Court ORDERS Appellant’s attorney, pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 48.4, to 

send Appellant a copy of this opinion and this court’s judgment, to notify Appellant of his right 

to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and to inform Appellant of the applicable 

deadlines. See TEX.R.APP.P. 48.4, 68. Appellant’s attorney is further ORDERED to comply 

with all of the requirements of TEX.R.APP.P. 48.4. This decision shall be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Logility, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Number 333-145797 on Form S-8) of Logility, Inc. and subsidiary (the “Company”) of our report dated July 14, 2008 with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Logility, Inc. and subsidiary as of April 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedApril 30, 2008, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the April 30, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Logility, Inc. Our report refers to a change in accounting for stock-based compensation in 2007.

/s/    KPMG LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

July 14, 2008
exh101.htm




Exhibit 10.1







Consultants Work Agreement







This agreement amends the consultants work agreement dated July 7th 2010.







Parties  This consulting agreement is made between the following parties: Consultant, Gregory Ruff 12901 South Buttercup Lane, Spokane WA 99224, herein after referred to a Ruff, and QE Brushes Inc., a Nevada Corporation, herein referred as QE.







Recitals  QE Brushes wishes to engage the services of Ruff, and Ruff wishes to assist QE in its business endeavors.







Worked to be performed by Ruff, complete all necessary work for the transfer of control and assist the new board of directors in understanding the operations of QE and assist; them in their transition period. Be available to answer any questions about the company’s operations to date. Assist the new board in marketing the pet toothbrush and in the manufacturing process of any new orders for its new pet toothbrush. Assist in the promotion of QE to the investment community and assist in any venture capital fund raising activities. Services provided shall also include merger and acquisitions possibilities.












Compensation to Ruff for services rendered QE agrees to compensate Ruff by issuing 2,500,000 million common shares of common stock in return for his services and work to be performed. The valuation for Ruff's services shall be based upon $100 hr for approximately 120 hours of services.







Governing Law  the laws of Washington State and Nevada shall govern this agreement depending upon the state the aggrieved party files its action in.







Integration Clause  this agreement includes all of the parties understandings to date mentioned herein. Any prior oral or written facts that conflict with this agreement shall not be made part of this agreement and this agreement supersedes any prior understanding that the parties may have understood prior to this agreement.







Covenants  The QE Director or Officer warrants and promises that they have the authority to enter into this agreement on behalf of its corporation and shall provide a unanimous resolution by its board of directors agreeing to this consulting work agreement.













	
Consultant GREGORY RUFF

	
Date ________


	  	  
	
FRANCIS D’AMBROSIO

	
_____________


	
Director of Virtual Medical International Inc. (formerly QE Brushes Inc.)

	
Date
EXHIBIT 12.(a).2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Gil Rozen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Tefron Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.   disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

     a.   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial data; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: April 19, 2005

/s/ Gil Rozen
-------------
Gil Rozen
Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. CROSS.

No. COA07-1461.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Cumberland (07CRS15781).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Council Decision of 6 May 2014 appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee (2014/263/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 6 May 2014

# appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

# (2014/263/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and                              Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015(1).

(2)A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of                              Mr Yves VANSCHUEREN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Dominique MICHEL, *Administrateur délégué de COMEOS (Fédération belge du Commerce et des Services)* is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 20 September 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 6 May 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

G. Stournaras                            

1

OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 550 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2008 

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of 

the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

S 550 RFH

1 SECTION 1. COMPOSITION OF SUPERIOR COURT. 

2 Section 903 of title 11 of the District of Columbia 

3 Code is amended by striking ‘‘fifty-eight’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘61’’. 

Passed the Senate February 4, 2008. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Steve SAWYER v. MARKET AMERICA, INC.

No. 312P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Donald Leon Kalberer, Kenneth R. Keller, Greensboro, for Sawyer.

Pressly M. Millen, Patricia L. Holland, Raleigh, for Market America, Inc.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 661 S.E.2d 750.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of July 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
Sarona R. KELLEY, Employee v. WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Self-Insured Employer. Administered by: The Schaffer Companies, Ltd. (previously administered by Compensation Claims Solutions).

No. 64P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Bambee B. Blake, Ginny P. Lanier, Cary, Roger A. Askew, Scott W. Warren, Raleigh, for Sheriff's Department.

George W. Lennon, Raleigh, Michael W. Bertics, for Kelley.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Sheriff's Department) on the 18th day of February 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th day of February 2008 by Defendant (Sheriff's Department) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
STATE v. BUTLER.

No. COA08-428.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS59304, 06CRS59305, 06CRS59306, 07CRS3061, 07CRS3062, 07CRS3063).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
# The Criminal Justice (European Protection Order) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2014 No. 320

Criminal Law

# The Criminal Justice (European Protection Order) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

18th December 2014

Coming into operation

11th January 2015

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Rule revoked (31.12.2020) by The Criminal Justice (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/780), regs. 1(1), **10** (with regs. 11, 12) (as amended by S.I. 2020/1408, regs. 1, 45-47); 2020 c. 1, Sch. 5 para. 1(1)
# C_2023338EN.01002601.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/26

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 July 2023 — Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma v Commission

(Case T-228/23 R)

(Interim relief - Medicinal products for human use - Marketing authorisation - Application for interim measures - Application for injunction - Lack of urgency)

(2023/C 338/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Zaklady Farmaceutyczne Polpharma S.A. (Starogard Gdański, Poland) (represented by: K. Roox, T. De Meese, J. Stuyck, M. Van Nieuwenborgh and C. Dumont, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Mathieu and C. Valero, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, first, suspension of operation of the decision of the European Commission contained in its letter of 17 March 2023, by which the Commission requires it to comply with the protection period for the reference medicinal product Tecfidera — Dimethyl fumarate as regards the placing on the market of the medicinal product Dimethyl fumarate Polpharma — Dimethyl fumarate (‘DMF Polpharma’) and to give written undertakings to that effect and any subsequent decision or act extending or replacing the contested measure, in so far as they concern it, and, second, an injunction requiring the Commission to refrain from taking any other measures which would amount to a withdrawal of the marketing authorisation enjoyed by it or a prohibition on placing DMF Polpharma on the market.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FROM THE
PRICE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (570)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 545,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     241,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   545,684
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,973
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,844<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (162)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,846
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.54
<FN>
<F1>The financial statements reflect an unclassified balance sheet due to the
nature of the Company's industry - Real Estate.
<F2>The Company utilizes a condensed balance sheet format for 10-k reporting.
Amounts are included in Other Assets.
<F3>Amount is comprised of $49,910 of expenses less interest expense of $9,066
reflected elsewhere in this Financial Data Schedule.
</FN>

</TABLE>
exv10w9






English Translation

Exhibit 10.9




Form of Power of Attorney



I (A, a PRC citizen, ID card number:        ) is a shareholder holding the B
equity (“my equity”) of Hangzhou Fanyi Technologies Co., Ltd. I hereby irrevocably authorize
Hangzhou Dianneng Technologies Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”) to exercise the following rights in respect of my
equity within the valid term of this Power of Attorney:



Authorizing WFOE as my sole and exclusive proxy to exercise the following rights on my behalf in
the matters regarding my equity, including, but not limited to 1) attend the shareholders’ meeting
of Hangzhou Fanyi Technologies Co., Ltd.; 2) exercise all the shareholder rights and voting power
granted to me under the laws and the articles of association of Hangzhou Fanyi Technologies Co.,
Ltd., including, without limitation, selling, transferring, pledging or otherwise disposing of all
or part of my equity; and 3) as my authorized representative, designate and appoint the legal
representative (board chairman), directors, executive directors, supervisors, general manager and
other officers of Hangzhou Fanyi Technologies Co., Ltd.



WFOE will have the right to, on my behalf and within the authorization, execute the transfer
agreement set forth in the Exclusive Purchase Option Agreement (to which I am a party) and perform
the Equity Pledge Agreement and the Exclusive Purchase Option Agreement to which I am a party and
which are signed on the signing date of this Power of Attorney. The exercise of this right will not
create any limitation on this authorization.



All acts done by WFOE in respect of my equity are regarded as my acts and all the documents signed
by WFOE are deemed having been signed by me. I will acknowledge any such acts and documents.



WFOE has the right to convey the entrustment and may entrust another person or entity in respect of
the foregoing matters without prior notice to me or with my consent.



During the period when I am a shareholder of Hangzhou Fanyi Technologies Co., Ltd., this Power of
Attorney is irrevocable and continues in force from its signing date.



During the duration of this Power of Attorney, I hereby waive all the rights granted through this
Power of Attorney to WFOE in respect of my equity and cease to exercise any such rights.




C

Signature: D

February 1, 2010






 









 





Annex




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	A	 	B	 	C	 	D
	Tao Song
	 	75%	 	Tao Song	 	/s/ Tao Song
	Tao Yang
	 	25%	 	Tao Yang	 	/s/ Tao Yang






048110-0001
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

J.M, a Child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1644

[February 9, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael James Orlando, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

21001802DLA.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 521 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse and customhouse located at 515 West First Street in Duluth, Minnesota, as the 

‘‘Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United States Courthouse 

and Customhouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2007 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse and customhouse located at 515 West First Street 

in Duluth, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Gerald W. Heaney Federal 

Building and United States Courthouse and Customhouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

5 and customhouse located at 515 West First Street in Du6 luth, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 521 IS

1 ‘‘Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United States 

2 Courthouse and Customhouse’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

6 building and United States courthouse and customhouse 

7 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

8 to the ‘‘Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United 

9 States Courthouse and Customhouse’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1


 





THIRD AMENDMENT 


 


TO 


 


ADVISORY AGREEMENT


 


AMONG


 


STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC.


 


STRATEGIC REALTY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP,
LP,


 


AND


 


SRT ADVISOR, LLC


 


THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ADVISORY AGREEMENT
(“THIRD AMENDMENT”), dated as of July 19, 2016 (the “Effective Date”) is entered into by and among Strategic
Realty Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), Strategic Realty Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited
partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), and SRT Advisor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”).
Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Advisory Agreement.


 





W I T N E S S E T H


 


WHEREAS, the Company, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor
entered into that certain Advisory Agreement dated as of August 10, 2013, which was amended by that certain First Amendment to
Advisory Agreement dated as of July 15, 2014, and that Second Amendment to Advisory Agreement dated as of August 3, 2015 (as amended
by this Third Amendment , the “Advisory Agreement”) which by its terms will expire on August 9, 2016; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to renew the Advisory Agreement
for an additional 12 months from August 10, 2016, on the terms and conditions set forth below.


 





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the
mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


 





		1.	Term: The Advisory Agreement is hereby renewed for an additional term of twelve months, beginning on August 10, 2016.



  


		2.	Except as specifically set forth above, the Advisory Agreement shall remain unmodified, and in full force and effect.



 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Third
Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


 


Strategic
Realty Trust, Inc.


 





	By:	/s/
    Andrew Batinovich	 
	 	 	 
	 	Andrew Batinovich,
    President	 


 


 


Strategic
Realty Operating Partnership, L.P.


 


	 	By:	Strategic Realty Trust, Inc.
	 	 	 	 
	 		Its General Partner
	 	 	 	 
	 		By:	/s/ Andrew Batinovich	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	Andrew Batinovich, President	 


 


 


SRT
Advisor, LLC


 


	 	By:	/s/ G. Lee Burns	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	G. Lee Burns, SVP