alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.**

 

**Certification of Marc Holliday, President of WyomingAcquisition GP LLC, the sole general partner of the Registrant, pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

 

I,Marc Holliday, President of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole generalpartner of Reckson Operating Partnership, L. P. (the “Company”), certifypursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2)   The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   August 12, 2010 | By     | /s/  Marc Holliday                          |
|------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Marc  Holliday                              |
|                               |   | President                                   |
|                               |   | of  Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC,             |
|                               |   | the  sole general partner of the Registrant |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**RECKSONOPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.**

 

**Certificationof Marc Holliday, President of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole generalpartner of the Registrant, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code**

 

I, Marc Holliday,President of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, the sole general partner of RecksonOperating Partnership, L. P. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1)   TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 12,  2009 | By     | /s/  MARC HOLLIDAY                          |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                           |   | Marc Holliday                               |
|                           |   | President                                   |
|                           |   | of Wyoming  Acquisition GP LLC,             |
|                           |   | the sole general  partner of the Registrant |

 

----
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 18 - 00260 - CR NO. 02 - 18 - 00261 - CR NO. 02 - 18 - 00262 - CR
JOSE WHITFIELD APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO S . 55,778
- A, 55,986
- A , 56,109
- A

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- O n Ju ne 3 , 201 6 , Jose Whitfield pleaded guilty to the t hird
- degree felony of tampering with or fabricating evidence, the first
- degree felony of aggravated robbery, and the first
- degree felony of delivery of more than f our but less than two hundred grams of methamphetamine. T he trial court assessed his

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

punishme nt at eight years’ confinement , fifteen years’ confinement, and twenty

five years’ confinement, respectively

. On May 28, 2018, appellant signed pro se Motion s for Direct Appeal in each case , which he mailed to the Wichita County D istrict Clerk on May 29, 2 018. The Clerk filed the motion s , which we construe as notice s of appeal , on June 4, 2018. Rule 26.2 of the rules of appellate procedure requires that a notice of appeal be filed within thirty days after the date sentence is imposed or within ninety days a fter the date sentence is imposed if the defendant files a timely motion for a new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1)

– (2). Therefore, a ppellant’s notice s of appeal filed almost two years after sentencing w ere not timely. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). On June 6 , 201 8 , we sent appellant a letter expressing our concern that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal s because he did not timely file his notice s of appeal . We informed appellant that we could dismiss the appeal s unless he filed a response showing grou nds for continuing them , but
a ppellant has not done so

. A timely
- filed notice of appeal is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Without a timely
filed notice of appeal, we must dismis s an appeal. Id. ; Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522

– 23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Because appellant’s notice s of appeal were not timely filed , we dismiss his appeal s for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a), 43.2(f).3 PER CURIAM

PANEL: BIRDWEL L, J.; SUDDERTH, C.J.; and WALKER, J. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: August 9, 2018
STATE v. NEELY.

No. COA08-325.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 18, 2008.

Certification Date December 8, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (07CRS50055, 07CRS5024).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated February 28, 2007accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAIT Financial Trust (formerly RAIT Investment Trust)and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of RAIT Financial Trust on Form S-3 (File No. 333-139948, effective on January 12, 2007; FileNo. 333-139889, effective on January 10, 2007; File No. 333-103618, effective on March 14, 2003; File No. 333-69366, effective on October 18, 2001; and File No. 333-78519, effective May 14, 1999) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-125480, effective on June3, 2005; File No. 333-109158, effective on September 26, 2003; File No. 333-100766, effective on October 25, 2002; and File No. 333-67452, effective on August 14, 2001). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

February 28, 2007
BROYHILL v. BROYHILL.

No. COA08-512.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Wilkes (06CVD711).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated.
----

(2004/C 33 E/268)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2389/03

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(18 July 2003)

Subject:   Health Promotion Programme 1997-2002

Can the Commission provide a list of the professional associations, NGOs, national administrations and public or private bodies which have received payments or contributions (indicating the amounts concerned, whether already paid or not) under the individual actions of the European Community Health Promotion Programme for 1997-2002?

Can the Commission also state whether checks have been made as to whether the sums have in fact reached the intended recipients and whether the initiatives have been properly carried out?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-2386/03 and E-2389/03

given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(18 August 2003)

The five year programme of Community Action on Health Promotion, Information, Education and Training was adopted by the Parliament and the Council by decision No 645/96/EC (1) on 16 April 1996 with a total budget of 35 million ECU. On 17 March 2001, the Parliament and the Council adopted an extension of this programme to 31 December 2002 with an increased budget of EUR 14,54 million for the last two years.

Pursuant to Article 7 paragraph 2 of Decision No 645/96/ECan interim evaluation on the Health Promotion Programme has been carried out. The report is published in full on the Commission website http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/index_en.html. A final evaluation of this programme together with the other public health programmes is currently being carried out. The report of this evaluation will be published in 2004.

Each funded project of the Health Promotion Programme has been monitored through the evaluation of an interim report depending on the amount of the budget and of the final report. When the technical report or financial statement have raised questions, further control measures such as site visits have been carried out with a view to undertaking a precise audit and to clarifying all queries and questions. In addition, based on a small sample exercise or in cases where funding has been agreed for several years some audit visits have been carried out.

The attached list shows all projects funded under the Health Promotion Programme since 1996, with a detailed breakdown of the budgets attributed to these projects.

----

(1)  Decision No 645/96/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 29 March 1996 adopting a programme of Community action on health promotion, information, education and training within the framework for action in the field of public health, OJ L 95, 16.4.1996.

----
STATE v. BAKER.

No. COA08-743.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Wayne (06CRS51809, 06CRS8433).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-56987) pertaining to the 1997 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan 
and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Province Healthcare Company of our 
reports dated: (1) April 30, 1997, except for the second paragraph of Note 10, 
as to which the date is February 4, 1998, with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements of Brim, Inc., and (2) February 19, 1999, except for Note 
16, as to which the date is February 22, 1999, with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements and schedule of Province Healthcare Company, both included 
in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Nashville, Tennessee
March 25, 1999
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20822

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO SALAS-AVALOS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-210-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco SalasAvalos (Salas) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Salas has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
IN RE J.M.

No. COA08-1184.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 3, 2009.

Certification Date February 23, 2009.

Appeal from Harnett (06J178).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and Remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Utah Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference 
call of the Utah State Advisory Committee will convene at 10 a.m. 
(m.d.t.) and adjourn at 11 a.m. (m.d.t.), Thursday, September 15, 2005. 
The purpose of the conference call is to provide a status report on the 
Commission and regional programs, and planning for future activities.
    This conference call is available to the public through the 
following call-in number: 1-800-473-7796; call-in ID<greek-i>: 4390-
5603. Any interested member of the public may call this number and 
listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls 
not initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines 
and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will 
incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line 
connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the 
proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-
8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and 
access code.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting John 
F. Dulles, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, (303) 866-1040 (TDD 303-866-
1049), by 3 p.m. (m.d.t.) on Monday, September 12, 2005.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC September 7, 2005.
Ivy L. Davis,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 05-18136 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 1, 2016

No. 04-16-00589-CR

Anthony George NELSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR2179

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The court reporter has filed a second notification of late record stating that she is unable 

to file the reporter’s record because (1) appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the 

reporter’s fee, and (2) her other duties preclude her from working on the record. The court 

reporter states that she anticipates that she will complete the record by November 27, 2016.

The clerk’s record shows the trial court appointed counsel to represent appellant in this 

appeal. Thus, the trial court has made a finding that appellant is indigent. Appellant is therefore

entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. 

We GRANT the court reporter a second extension of time to file the reporter’s record. 

The reporter’s record is due on November 28, 2016. No further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of November, 2016.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
To the Board of Directors of Fina Europe NV
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
PetroFina SA on Form S-8 (File No. 333-61145) of our report dated March 22,
1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form F-20 of PetroFina SA for the year
ended December 31, 1998, relating to the balance sheets of Fina Europe NV as of
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and the related statements of income for each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1998.
 
April 27, 1999
Antwerp, Belguim
 
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler Reviseurs d'Enterprises
Represented by
 
/s/ L. RUYSEN
 
L. Ruysen
WHD, L.P. v. MAYFLOWER CAPITAL, LLC.

No. COA08-541.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (03CVS4991).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               86,075,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,859,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       81,104,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,608,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (151,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,859,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,141,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,854,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               147,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,933,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (793,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (219,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (574,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (574,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert S. Smith, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 218]

Appeal from a resentence of the Orleans County Court (James E Punch, J.), rendered August 9, 2004. Defendant was resentenced upon his conviction of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the resentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant previously appealed from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of, inter alia, assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [3]) for stabbing his wife. His sole contention in the prior appeal was that County Court erred in failing to set forth its reasons for excepting the statement by the victim from the presentence report, as required by CPL 390.50 (2) (a), and we agreed with defendant *(People v Smith,*8 AD3d 1043 [2004]). We therefore modified the judgment by vacating the sentence, and we remitted the matter to County Court for resentencing, “at which time the court shall either disclose the victim’s statement to defendant, or set forth its reasons for exercising its discretion not to disclose the statement” *(id.*at 1044). The present contentions of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel with respect to his plea and the original sentence are not reviewable on this appeal from the resentence *(see People v Luddington,*5 AD3d 1042 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 643 [2004]; *see generally*CPL 450.30 [3]; *People v Ferrin,*197 AD2d 882 [1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 849 [1993]). We reject defendant’s challenge to the severity of the resentence, and note that the resentence is of shorter duration than the original sentence. Present— Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
# Decision (EU) 2015/1196 of the European Central Bank (repealed)Show full title

Decision (EU) 2015/1196 of the European Central Bank of 2 July 2015 amending Decision ECB/2010/21 on the annual accounts of            the European Central Bank (ECB/2015/26) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Decision (EU) 2015/1196 of the European Central Bank

# of 2 July 2015

# amending Decision ECB/2010/21 on the annual accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB/2015/26) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/35 of 14 January 2016 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against                                 Iran.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: October 7, 2004                     By: /s/ Nicholas Cirillo, Jr.
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Nicholas Cirillo, Jr.,
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to Clickable  Enterprises,
Inc. and will be retained by Clickable  Enterprises,  Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      F-iii
STATE v. SULLIVAN.

No. COA08-264.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 18, 2008.

Certification Date December 8, 2008.

Appeal from Henderson (07CRS50138, 07CRS50139, 07CRS50140, 07CRS50141).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3711 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2008 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To authorize a cost of living adjustment for the Federal 

judiciary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

S 3711 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT FOR THE FED2 ERAL JUDICIARY. 

3 Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97–92, jus4 tices and judges of the United States are authorized dur5 ing fiscal year 2009 to receive a salary adjustment in ac6 cordance with section 461 of title 28, United States Code. 

Passed the Senate November 20, 2008. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS