alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

*Board Action:*                     Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that the Accounting and Auditing Policy (AAPC), a permanent committee established by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) will meet on the following dates in room 6N30 of the GAO Building unless otherwise noted:                

—Tuesday, January 24, 2006

—Tuesday, March 14, 2006

—Tuesday, May 9, 2006

—Tuesday, July 18, 2006

—Tuesday, September 12, 2006

—Tuesday, October 31, 2006

The purposes of the meetings are to discuss issues related to:

—Heritage Assets and Stewardship Land Implementation,

—Inter-Entity Cost Implementation, and

—Any other topics as needed.

                    A more detailed agenda can be obtained from the Web site (                    *http://fasab.gov/​aapc/​aapc.html*) one week prior to each meeting.                

Any interested person may attend the meetings as an observer. Board discussion and reviews are open to the public. GAO Building security requires advance notice of your attendance. Please notify FASAB of your planned attendance by calling 202-512-7350 at least one day prior to the respective meeting.

*For Further Information, Contact:*                     Wendy M. Comes, Executive Director, 441 G St., NW., Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.                

Authority:Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92-463.

Dated: September 9, 2005.

Charles W. Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-18304 Filed 9-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
COPPER, et al. v. DENLINGER, et al.

No. 526A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 9, 2008.

Ann L. Majestic, Raleigh, for School Board, et al.

Frances P. Solari, for Copper, et al.

Dan M. Hartzog, Jr., Raleigh, for Denlinger.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of December 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Denlinger Individually) shall have up to and including the 9th day of January 2009 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of December 2008."
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: JOSE LUIS MONARREZ,

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-08-00252-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator, Jose Luis Monarrez, has filed a pro se petition seeking a writ of mandamus

compelling the presiding judge of the 243rd District Court of El Paso County to grant several

motions which he asserts have been pending in that court for some time.

Relief by writ of mandamus will only be granted in extraordinary circumstances where the

Relator is able to establish the trial court has clearly abused its discretion, and no adequate remedy

at law exists. See State ex. rel Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236

S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). Based on the petition and record before us, we are unable

to conclude that Relator is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, mandamus relief is denied.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3.

KENNETH R. CARR, Justice

August 28, 2008

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Carr, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
In the Matter of N.G.

No. 510A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 7, 2008.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 186 N.C.App. ___, 650 S.E.2d 45 (2007), affirming an order entered 30 January 2007 by Judge Albert A. Corbett, Jr. in District Court, Harnett County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 February 2008.

E. Marshall Woodall and Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for petitioner-appellee Harnett County Department of Social Services.

Elizabeth Myrick Boone, Sanford, for appellee Guardian ad Litem.

Sofie W. Hosford, Wilmington, for respondent-appellant mother.

Lisa Skinner Lefler, Wilmington, for respondent-appellant father.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Grady Lee NICHOLSON.

No. 238P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Grady Lee Nicholson, Salisbury, for Nicholson, Grady Lee.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

*565James R. O'Neill, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of July 2015 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony Craig WALKER.

No. 203P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

J. Aldean Webster, III, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Anthony Craig Walker, for Walker, Anthony Craig.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*852*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th of June 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# CE2004088EN.01032903.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/329 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/329

---

(2004/C 88 E/0336)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0613/03

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Commission

(3 March 2003)

Subject:   EU/Mozambique 1999-2003: cooperation, development, human rights, assistance, etc.

Subject:

For the years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and with regard to Mozambique, can the Commission provide information on the following: What programmes have been or are being undertaken by the EU with Mozambique? What are the funds allocated? What is the expected duration of the individual programmes? What results have been obtained by the programmes, and what assessment has been made of their success or otherwise? What particular developments have characterised each of the programmes?

---
**Exhibit 99.14**

**CONSENT OF LUC JONCAS, P.ENG.**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibits thereto, ofGoldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the “Annual Report”), I, Luc Joncas, P.Eng., consent to (i) the use of and reference to the technical report dated 31 December, 2015, entitled“Éléonore Operations, Quebec, Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report” (the “Technical Report”), or portions thereof, that was prepared by me, that I supervised thepreparation of and/or was reviewed and approved by me, (ii) the use of and references to my name, including as an expert or “qualified person”, in connection with the Annual Report and the Technical Report, and (iii) the informationderived or summarized from the Technical Report that is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto. 

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibits thereto intoRegistration Statement Nos. 333-126039,333-126040,333-151243,333-151251,333-174376,333-181116,333-188805,333-195816 and333-213153 on Form S-8,No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company. 

Date: March 16, 2017
STATE of North Carolina v. Warren Keith BOLTON.

No. COA15-224.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 17, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
FOX, et al. v. JOHNSON, et al.

No. 26P14-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

G. Gray Wilson, Winston-Salem, Attorney at Law, for Johnson, Mitchell, et al.

Stuart H. Russell, Winston-Salem, Attorney at Law.

Lorin J. Lapidus, Attorney at Law.

John C. Vermitsky, Winston-Salem, Attorney at Law, for Fox, William Thomas, et al.

Matthew N. Leerberg, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys.

The following order has been entered on the conditional motion filed on the 12th of November 2015 by N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."

EDMUNDS and ERVIN, J. recused.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1507

In Re: ALINE LAN, Debtor.

_________________________ BILL SHU-CHUN HAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALINE LAN, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1957-A, BK-96-15888, AP-97-1025A) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bill Shu-Chun Han, Appellant Pro Se. Aline Lan, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court’s order affirmingthe bankruptcy court’s decision that the debt Appellee owed to Appellant is dischargeable in bankruptcy. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Han v. Lan , Nos. CA-97-1957-A; BK-96-15888; AP-97-1025A (E.D. Va. May. 20. 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00137-CV

In re Jack Brewer §

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Denton County (CV2012-03128)

April 24, 2013

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and 

motion for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. 

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency 

relief are denied.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 99.22
 CONSENT OF P. STEPHENSON
   1.
    
    The technical report dated May 1, 2008 entitled Pueblo Viejo Gold
Project, Dominican Republic Technical Report (the Pueblo Viejo
Report); and2.
    
    The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection
with information relating to the Pueblo Viejo Report and the Pueblo
Viejo Project, and the properties described therein.
  /s/ Patrick StephensonName:
    Patrick Stephenson, FAusIMM (CP)Title:
    Regional Manager/Principal Geologist
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

               In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN
Television Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Gary R. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Vincent L. Sadusky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


      Dated: November 4, 2004             /s/ Gary R. Chapman
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Gary R. Chapman
                                          Chief Executive Officer


      Dated: November 4, 2004             /s/ Vincent L. Sadusky
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Vincent L. Sadusky
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESTEBAN ORTEGA-SANCHEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72614

Agency No. A077-596-084

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 24, 2013** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Esteban Ortega-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

FILED

OCT 02 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-72614

evidence the agency’s determination regarding continuous physical presence,

Gutierrez v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the

petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Ortega-Sanchez

failed to establish ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States

prior to the service of his Notice to Appear because Ortega-Sanchez knowingly and

voluntarily accepted administrative voluntary departure in lieu of appearing before

an IJ during the relevant ten-year period. See id. at 1117-18 (acceptance of

voluntary departure terminates physical presence if petitioner understood he had

the right to go before an IJ and chose to depart instead). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Scottish Power plc (the Company)
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip Bowman, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 30, 2006

/s/ Philip Bowman Philip Bowman Chief Executive
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RODNEY ROBINSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1896

[November 21, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr., 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 10-18671 CF10A.

Rodney Robinson, Bristol, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2023155EN.01006701.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/67

---

Action brought on 3 March 2023 — UZ v Commission and ECHA

(Case T-121/23)

(2023/C 155/84)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: UZ (represented by: H. Estreicher, A. Bartl and M. Escorneboueu, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission, European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the application admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the application admissible and well-founded;

| — | annul decision of the European Commission (grow.f.1(2022)9602146) dated 21 December 2022, and the appended report from ECHA, concerning the denial of a request by Concawe, acting on behalf of its members (including the applicant), to reconsider the listing of the substance phenanthrene as a Substance of Very High Concern; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul decision of the European Commission (grow.f.1(2022)9602146) dated 21 December 2022, and the appended report from ECHA, concerning the denial of a request by Concawe, acting on behalf of its members (including the applicant), to reconsider the listing of the substance phenanthrene as a Substance of Very High Concern;

| — | order the defendants to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendants to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment by the European Commission by not giving a mandate to ECHA to prepare a dossier to re-evaluate the listing of phenanthrene in the Candidate List, despite the fact that both the nature of the new information and the report from ECHA indicated that the new information was relevant for the re-evaluation. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment by the European Commission by not giving a mandate to ECHA to prepare a dossier to re-evaluate the listing of phenanthrene in the Candidate List, despite the fact that both the nature of the new information and the report from ECHA indicated that the new information was relevant for the re-evaluation.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the Defendants acted ultra vires and/or breached Article 59 REACH by carrying out a definitive re-assessment of phenanthrene delisting, instead of limiting their assessment to the question whether the new information is reliable and relevant for the re-evaluation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the Defendants acted ultra vires and/or breached Article 59 REACH by carrying out a definitive re-assessment of phenanthrene delisting, instead of limiting their assessment to the question whether the new information is reliable and relevant for the re-evaluation.

---
Exhibit 99.20

CONSENT OF CHESTER MOORE

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the
AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



|1. | The technical report dated March 16, 2012, entitled Technical Report on the Pueblo Viejo Project, Sanchez Ramirez Province, Dominican Republic NI 43-101
Report (the Pueblo Viejo Report); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Pueblo Viejo Report and the Pueblo Viejo Project, and the
properties described therein.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information
contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376 and 333-181116 on Form S-8 of the Company.



|                    |  |                             
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: March 1, 2013 |  |                             
|                    | 
|                    |  | /s/ Chester Moore           
|                    |  | Name: Chester Moore, P. Eng.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to, and as required  by, 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of  2002,  that  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Hauppauge  Digital,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 fully  complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended,  and that  information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 14, 2003
                                                     /s/ Kenneth Plotkin
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Kenneth Plotkin
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


                                                     /s/ Gerald  Tucciarone
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Gerald Tucciarone
                                                     Chief Financial Officer and
                                                     Treasurer