alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR TO DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        84,226,329
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   7,515,900
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             119,131,325
<CASH>                                      22,514,299
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          13,735,735
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,087,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             166,376,967
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            112,528,589
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             32,760,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                        40,790
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,670,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               166,376,967
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         22,286,339
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (138,815)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  30,089
<BENEFITS>                                   5,508,396
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         6,323,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,609,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,609,649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,609,649
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              95,159,629
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            4,398,533
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             4,024,754
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             95,533,408
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      5,423,805


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          84,172
<SECURITIES>                                    28,966,634
<RECEIVABLES>                                   532,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,583,446
<PP&E>                                          1,120,230
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (468,376)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,235,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,295,885
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        130
<OTHER-SE>                                      5,939,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,235,300
<SALES>                                         12,683,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,683,044
<CGS>                                           9,312,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   9,312,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,621,732
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              363,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,385,789
<INCOME-TAX>                                    642,781
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    743,008
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.47
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.21

CONSENT OF ANDRÉ VILLENEUVE

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the
AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



|1. | The technical report dated March 16, 2012, entitled Technical Report on the Pueblo Viejo Project, Sanchez Ramirez Province, Dominican Republic NI 43-101
Report (the Pueblo Viejo Report); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Pueblo Viejo Report and the Pueblo Viejo Project, and the
properties described therein.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information
contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251, 333-174376 and 333-181116 on Form S-8 of the Company.



|                    |  |                                
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: March 1, 2013 |  |                                
|                    | 
|                    |  | /s/ André Villeneuve           
|                    |  | Name: André Villeneuve, P. Eng.
STATE of North Carolina v. Edward WILLIAMS, III.

No. 318P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Edward Williams, III, Marion, for Williams, Edward (III).

Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Gary W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th of September 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
STATE of North Carolina v. Rashawn MACKEY.

No. 241P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 27th of July 2015 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7834

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEREK JOSEPH PARKER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cr-00253-RJC-DCK-1; 3:19-cv00250-RJC)

Submitted: October 19, 2021 Decided: December 13, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek Joseph Parker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Derek Joseph Parker seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and denying his motion to reconsider. The orders are not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district 

court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims 

debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Parker has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J.Neithercut, Chief Financial Officer of Equity Residential, general partner ofERPOP, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.

 

 

 
| /s/                                             | David J. Neithercut |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| David J.  Neithercut                            |
| Chief  Financial Officer of  Equity Residential |
| November 13,  2003                              |

 

----
STATE v. BYNUM.

No. COA08-72.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 18, 2008.

Certification Date December 8, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (06CRS246637).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





For
      purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Anthony Principe, the chief
      financial officer of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies
      that, to his knowledge:





(i)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
            /s/
                Anthony PrincipeAnthony
                Principe*Chief
                Financial Officer**On2
                Technologies, Inc.*





October
      10, 2007
Robert CARPENTER and Tammy Carpenter, Individually and Tammy Carpenter as Administrator of the Estate of Monique L. Carpenter v. Willie McKINNEY, Individually and jointly and severally with Windham Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc., Individually and jointly and severally with Old Republic Home Protection Company, Inc., Individually and jointly and severally with Paul Edward Windham, Individually and d/b/a Windham Heating & Air.

No. 266PA14.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Roderick T. Mclver, Attorney at Law, For Carpenter, Robert, et al.

Joshua D. Lanning, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For McKinney, Willie, et al.

Melinda L. Vervais, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, For McKinney, Willie, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 30th of July 2014 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
----

(2004/C 33 E/110)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1372/03

by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(15 April 2003)

Subject:   Promotion of olive oil on the Community and world markets

The provisions to promote olive oil on the European and world markets contained in the regulation governing the common organisation of the market in olive oil expired at the end of 2002. Moreover, olive oil is not covered by Council Regulation (EC) 2826/2000 (1) on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market or the corresponding Commission implementing Regulation (EC) 94/2002 (2). Since 1 January 2003, therefore, there has been no Community action to promote olive oil on the world market.

Since this situation is one of concern to olive growers, will the Commission say what steps it will take to address this problem?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(21 May 2003)

Olive oil Promotion on the Internal Market

A directly managed Union-wide campaign to promote the consumption of olive oil (the seventh campaign) based on the old regulatory framework was still ongoing at the time when the new Regulation (3) was initially adopted. This is why olive oil was not included in the list of products eligible for promotion at that time.

The implementation of this campaign was finalised by the end of 2002. The evaluation part will be finalised by the end of June 2003.

With the latest amendment of the above mentioned Regulation (4), olive oil and table olives were included in the list of eligible products and guidelines to draft the programmes were annexed. This will enable the professional organisations in the producing Member States to submit proposals within the current Regulation.

Olive oil Promotion in Third Countries

Based on Council Regulation (EC) No 2702/1999 of 14 December 1999 on information/promotion of agricultural products in third countries (5), the Community may where measures are decided in particular for the olive oil and table olive sector, carry them out through the International Olive Oil Council (IOOC).

The IOOC is for the moment in the process of reforming its administration and procedures.

For the time being the IOOC promotional activities are carried out with an annual budget of EUR 500 000 comprising the obligatory contributions of the IOOC members to the promotion fund.

A decision to contribute additionally with a voluntary financial contribution of the Community to the promotion fund remains to be taken.

----

(1)OJ L 328, 23.12.2000, p. 2.

(2)OJ L 17, 19.1.2002, p. 20.

(3)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 94/2002 of 18 January 2002 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market.

(4)  Regulation (EC) No 497/2003 of 18 March 2003 amending Regulation (EC) No 94/2002 of 18 January 2002 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market, OJ L 74, 20.3.2003.

(5)OJ L 327, 21.12.1999.

----
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

5 filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 HOWARD FELDMAN,

8 Plaintiff-Appellant,

9 v. NO. 30,148 

10 MARCUS SCHANDELWEIN and

11 EXECUTIVE AUTOMOTIVE,

12 Defendants-Appellees.

13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

14 Daniel A. Sanchez, District Judge

15 Howard A. Feldman

16 Santa Fe, NM

17 Pro Se Appellant

18 Rudy Martin

19 Espanola, NM

20 for Appellees

21 MEMORANDUM OPINION

22 FRY, Chief Judge.

23 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.

24 No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing
2

1 so has expired. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our

2 calendar notice.
3

1 IT IS SO ORDERED.

2 

3 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

4 WE CONCUR:

5 

6 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

7 

8 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 469 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the special 

rule for contributions of qualified conservation contributions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2007 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the special rule for contributions of qualified 

conservation contributions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULE FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF QUALI4 FIED CONSERVATION CONTRIBUTIONS MADE 

5 PERMANENT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

7 (1) INDIVIDUALS.—Subparagraph (E) of sec8 tion 170(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

9 (relating to contributions of qualified conservation 

10 contributions) is amended by striking clause (vi). 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 469 IS

1 (2) CORPORATIONS.—Subparagraph (B) of sec2 tion 170(b)(2) of such Code (relating to qualified 

3 conservation contributions) is amended by striking 

4 clause (iii). 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to contributions made in taxable 

7 years beginning after the date of the enactment of this 

8 Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
# C_2023134EN.01002001.xml

| 17.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/20

---

Action brought on 28 February 2023 — Myforest Foods v EUIPO (MYBACON)

(Case T-107/23)

(2023/C 134/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Myforest Foods Co. (Delaware, United States) (represented by: P. Martini-Berthon, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark MYBACON — Application for registration No 18 546 358

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2022 in Case R 1201/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant, including the costs of proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant, including the costs of proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
**Exhibit 99.17****CONSENT OF P. STEPHENSON**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated byreference therein (the “40-F”) of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December31, 2009, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and theAnnual Information Form (the “AIF”) and Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of theCompany for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference inthe 40-F.     I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the followingreport(s) and to the references, as applicable, to my name in connection with (including, as anexpert) the following report(s) and documents: 1. The technical report dated May 1, 2008, entitled “Pueblo Viejo GoldProject, Dominican Republic Technical Report” (the “Pueblo ViejoReport”); and  2. The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connectionwith information relating to the Pueblo Viejo Report and the PuebloViejo Project, and the properties described therein.Date:March 19, 2010              /s/ Patrick Stephenson     Name:  Patrick Stephenson, FAusIMM (CP)     AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.