alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Christopher Anthony CLEGG.

No. 101P15-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jan. 28, 2016.

Chrstopher Anthony Clegg, Raleigh, for Clegg, Christopher Anthony.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of October 2015 by Defendant for Beal of Particulars and Probable Cause Indictment:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2016."
2


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                       FIRST NORTH AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK

                     ______________________________________

                         FNANB CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST
                     ______________________________________


         The  undersigned,  a duly  authorized  representative  of  First  North
American  National Bank, as Servicer (the  "Servicer"),  pursuant to the Amended
and Restated  Master  Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  dated as of December 31,
2001 (as such  agreement may have been,  or may, from time to time be,  amended,
supplemented  or otherwise  modified,  the "Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement"),
among DC Funding  International,  Inc.,  as  Transferor,  First  North  American
National  Bank,  as  Transferor  under the Prior  Agreement  (as  defined in the
Pooling and Servicing  Agreement)  and as Servicer,  and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as
Trustee  (successor  in  such  capacity  to  First  Union  National  Bank)  (the
"Trustee"),  does  hereby  certify  to the  best of his or her  knowledge  after
reasonable investigation that:

         1.  Capitalized  terms used in this  certificate  have their respective
meanings set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         2. The Servicer is as of the date hereof the Servicer under the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement.

         3. The undersigned is a Servicing Officer.

         4. This certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement.

         5. A review of the  activities  of the Servicer  during the Fiscal Year
ended February 28, 2003 and of its  performance  under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement was made under the supervision of the undersigned.

         6. Based on such review,  to the best of the  undersigned's  knowledge,
the  Servicer  has fully  performed  all its  obligations  under the Pooling and
Servicing  Agreement  throughout  such Fiscal Year and no event which,  with the
giving of notice or passage of time or both, would constitute a Servicer Default
has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 7 below.

         7. The  following is a description  of each Servicer  Default under the
provisions of the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  known to the  undersigned to
have occurred  during the Fiscal Year ended February 28, 2003,  which sets forth
in detail the (i) nature of each such Servicer Default, (ii) the action taken by
the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such Servicer Default and (iii) the current
status of each such Servicer Default: Not applicable.

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned,  a duly  authorized  Servicing
Officer, has duly executed this certificate this 29th day of May, 2003.


                                   /s/ Philip J. Dunn
                                   Name: Philip J. Dunn
                                   Title: Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6565

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RODRICKUS ANTONIO JAMISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (4:05-cv-00025-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 20, 2008

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodrickus Antonio Jamison, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew

Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 2 

PER CURIAM:

Rodrickus Antonio Jamison appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 motion . We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United Stats v. Jamison,

No. 4:05-cr-00025-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va. Apr. 1, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 720 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 720

 To amend title 4, United States Code, to authorize the Governor of a 
State, territory, or possession of the United States to order that the 
   National flag be flown at half-staff in that State, territory, or 
 possession in the event of the death of a member of the Armed Forces 
  from that State, territory, or possession who dies while serving on 
                              active duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2007

Mr. Levin (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 4, United States Code, to authorize the Governor of a 
State, territory, or possession of the United States to order that the 
   National flag be flown at half-staff in that State, territory, or 
 possession in the event of the death of a member of the Armed Forces 
  from that State, territory, or possession who dies while serving on 
                              active duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Army Specialist Joseph P. Micks 
Federal Flag Code Amendment Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF GOVERNORS TO ORDER THE NATIONAL FLAG TO BE FLOWN 
              AT HALF-STAFF IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH OF A MEMBER OF 
              THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Death of a Member of the Armed Forces.--Section 7(m) of title 
4, United States Code, is amended in the sixth sentence by inserting 
``or the death of a member of the Armed Forces from any State, 
territory, or possession who dies while serving on active duty'' after 
``present or former official of the government of any State, territory, 
or possession of the United States''.
    (b) Federal Facility Consistency With State Proclamation.--Such 
section is further amended by inserting after the sixth sentence the 
following new sentence: ``When the Governor of a State, territory, or 
possession issues a proclamation under the preceding sentence that the 
National flag be flown at half-staff because of the death of a member 
of the Armed Forces, the National flag flown at any Federal 
installation or facility in that State, territory, or possession shall 
be flown at half-staff consistent with that proclamation.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2023235EN.01004401.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/44

---

Action brought on 17 April 2023 — Domingo Alonso Group v EUIPO — Ald Automotive and Salvador Caetano Auto (my CARFLIX)

(Case T-200/23)

(2023/C 235/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Domingo Alonso Group, SL (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain) (represented by: J. García Domínguez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ald Automotive, SA (Majadahonda, Spain), Salvador Caetano Auto (SGPS), SA (Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietors of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court Domingo Alonso Group, SL and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal Salvador Caetano Auto (SGPS), SA

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark my CARFLIX — European Union trade mark No 18 124 505

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 October 2022 in Case R 2213/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul the contested decision and order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings and of the earlier proceedings before the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 60(1) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-86842 and 333-68283) and Forms S-8 (Nos.
333-42015, 333-78779, 333-90042 and 333-100214) of AMB Property, L.P. of our
reports dated February 13, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-K.

                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Francisco, California
March 11, 2004
Donna PACE, Executrix, of the Estate of Irene J. Stephenson v. WAKE FOREST BAPTIST CHURCH, Record Title Holder, And Trustees of the Wake Forest Baptist Church, Owners And Trustees of the Cecyl and Irene Stephenson Property, Wake forest, N.C.

No. 240P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

G. Eugene Boyce, Raleigh, for Donna Pace.

Randall M. Roden, F. Hill Allen, Roger W. Smith, Raleigh, for Baptist Church, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of May 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
Exhibit 99.16

CONSENT OF PETER NAHAN

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F and the documents incorporated by reference therein (the 40-F) of Goldcorp Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011, and any amendments thereto, to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Annual Information Form (the
AIF) and Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) of the Company for the year then ended, which are filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference in the 40-F.

I hereby consent to the references to, and the information derived from, the following report(s) and to the references, as applicable, to
my name in connection with (including, as an expert or qualified person) the following report(s) and documents:



| | 1. | The technical report dated March 21, 2011, entitled Goldcorp Inc., Peñasquito Polymetallic Project, Zacatecas State, Mexico NI 43-101 Technical
Report (the Peñasquito Report); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF, which include references in connection with information relating to the Peñasquito Report and the Peñasquito Mine, and
the properties described therein.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information
contained in the 40-F, the MD&A and the AIF into Registration Statement Nos. 333-126038, 333-126039, 333-126040, 333-138760, 333-151243, 333-151251 and 333-174376 on Form S-8 of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2012



/s/ Peter NahanName:

Peter Nahan, AusIMM
STATE of North Carolina v. Brandon Hamilton GREEN, Defendant.

No. COA14-1315.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Sept. 15, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

No Error.
STEPHENSON v. PALMATIER, et al.

No. 356P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Terry W. Stephenson, II, Lowell, for Stephenson, Terry Wayne (II).

Jeffrey Goss, Attorney at Law, for Palmatier, Terry L., et al.

Linda G. Wideman, for Wideman, Linda G.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of October 2015 by Plaintiff for Petition for Preliminary Injunction:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Telecommunications Income Fund XI (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
O. Brendengen, Chief Financial Officer of Commercial Power Finance, Inc.,
General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 15, 2005                      /s/  Ronald O. Brendengen
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                         Ronald O. Brendengen
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         Commercial Power Finance, Inc.
                                         General Partner
                                         Telecommunications Income Fund XI, L.P.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 645/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 645/2014 of 16 June 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 645/2014                     

# of 16 June 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 June 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2021 WY 34

 October Term, A.D. 2020

February 24, 2021

TONI LYNN OLESON,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff).

S-20-0209

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE

[¶ 1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that 

Appellant has not filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. Pursuant to a plea agreement, 

Appellant entered an unconditional guilty plea to one count of possession of 

methamphetamine, a third offense felony. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031(c). The district 

court imposed a sentence of 18 to 24 months, suspended in favor of two years of probation. 

Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s August 14, 2020, “Judgment

and Sentence.”

[¶ 2] On December 29, 2020, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a 

“Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 

S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently ordered that Appellant 

may “file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like the Court to 

consider in this appeal.” This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a 

pro se brief expired, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw 

and, if appropriate, make a final decision” on this appeal. Appellant’s pro se brief was due 

for filing on or before February 16, 2021. Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other 

pleading in the time allotted. 
[¶ 3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the “Anders brief” submitted by 

appellate counsel, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be 

granted and the district court’s “Judgment and Sentence” should be affirmed. It is, 

therefore,

[¶ 4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel 

for Appellant Toni Lynn Oleson, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for 

Appellant; and it is further

[¶ 5] ORDERED that the Sheridan County District Court’s August 14, 2020, “Judgment

and Sentence” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶ 6] DATED this 24th day of February, 2021.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

MICHAEL K. DAVIS

Chief Justice
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      ORTHODONTIC CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.
     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), of Orthodontic Centers of America, Inc. (the "Company"),
I, David E. Verret, Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

August 9, 2004                           /s/ David E. Verret
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         David E. Verret
                                         Senior Vice President of Finance and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,796
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         4,226
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    17,396
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        93,111
<ALLOWANCE>                                    204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,936
<DEPOSITS>                                     98,036
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,780
<LONG-TERM>                                    8,975
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,220
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 123,936
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                5,628
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              923
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               85
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6,636
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,317
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,692
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,944
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (5)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,127
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,127
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   672
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.45
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   69
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               215
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  6
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              204
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           204
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>