alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies,
pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Hauppauge Digital Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      February 11, 2011
              /s/ Kenneth PlotkinKenneth
      PlotkinChief
      Executive Officer





/s/ Gerald TucciaroneGerald
      TucciaroneChief
      Financial Officer, Treasurerand
      Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN TV Corp. for
the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Gary R. Chapman,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, William A. Cunningham, Vice President
and Controller, Deborah R. Jacobson, Vice President of Corporate Development and
Treasurer, and Peter E. Maloney, Vice President of Finance, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      /s/Gary R. Chapman
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2002            Gary R. Chapman
                                    Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/William A. Cunningham
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2002            William A. Cunningham
                                    Vice President and Controller

                                       /s/Deborah R. Jacobson
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2002            Deborah R. Jacobson
                                    Vice President of Corporate Development and
                                    Treasurer

                                      /s/Peter E. Maloney
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2002            Peter E. Maloney
                                    Vice President of Finance
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51130

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JULIO LAREDO-MENDEZ, also known as Julio Horacio Laredo, also known as

Julio Leredo, also known as Horacio Mendez-Martinez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-866-1

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Julio Laredo-Mendez pleaded guilty to attempted illegal reentry after

deportation and was sentenced to 48 months of imprisonment and three years

of supervised release. Laredo-Mendez argues that his prior California robbery

conviction under CAL. PENAL CODE § 211 is not a crime of violence within the

meaning of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). Laredo-Mendez acknowledges that this

court held that a California robbery conviction is a crime of violence in United

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51130

2

States v. Tellez-Martinez, 517 F.3d 813, 814 (5th Cir.), petition for cert. filed

(June 16, 2008) (No. 07-11483). However, he argues that Tellez-Martinez was

incorrectly decided. A panel of this court cannot overrule a prior panel’s decision

in the absence of intervening contrary or superseding authority by this court

sitting en banc or by the United States Supreme Court. United States v.

Lipscomb, 299 F.3d 303, 313 n.34 (5th Cir. 2002). This issue is foreclosed.

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the

motion for extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Quantine Alexander LITTLE.

No. 192P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

C. Scott Holmes, Durham, for Little.

Thomas J. Ziko, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of April 2008 by Defendant in *433this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 883/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 883/2014 of 5 August 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications (Jamón de Serón (PGI))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 883/2014                     

# of 5 August 2014

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Jamón de Serón                        (PGI))                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Jamón de Serón’ was                              published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Jamón de Serón’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name ‘Jamón de Serón’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.) as                     listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014(3).                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Martine Reicherts                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 101, 5.4.2014, p. 10.                           

3

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU)                              No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 542 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct feasibility studies to 

address certain water shortages within the Snake, Boise, and Payette 

River systems in the State of Idaho, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2007 

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct feasibility studies to address certain water shortages within 

the Snake, Boise, and Payette River systems in the State 

of Idaho, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT FEASIBILITY STUD4 IES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, act6 ing through the Bureau of Reclamation, may conduct fea7 sibility studies on projects that address water shortages 

8 within the Snake, Boise, and Payette River systems in the 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 542 IS

1 State of Idaho, and are considered appropriate for further 

2 study by the Bureau of Reclamation Boise Payette water 

3 storage assessment report issued during 2006. 

4 (b) BUREAU OF RECLAMATION.—A study conducted 

5 under this section shall comply with Bureau of Reclama6 tion policy standards and guidelines for studies. 

7 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

8 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Inte9 rior to carry out this section $3,000,000. 

10 (d) TERMINATION OF EFFECTIVENESS.—The au11 thority provided by this section terminates on the date 

12 that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
----

(2004/C 65 E/238)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2820/03

by Geoffrey Van Orden (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(19 September 2003)

Subject:   Separate registration numbers for trailers

The Netherlands have introduced a new law requiring each trailer (i.e. large trailer, small trailer, caravan, etc.) to have its own separate and unique registration plate fixed in the usual place.

The UK is one of two EU Member States that does not have a separate registration system for trailers.

I understand that the Dutch authorities are to require UK hauliers to apply for a temporary Dutch registration number called a ‘BO number’ in order to carry goods/cargo through the country.

The UK has a perfectly good system of ID numbers, which are unique to each trailer, which permit the authorities to trace trailers and their ownership.

Does the Commission regard the imposition of extra registration requirements by Member States on hauliers who adhere to the registration requirements of their home Member States as a barrier to the free movement of people and goods within the EU?

If so, what does the Commission intend to do to stop this?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(29 October 2003)

The Commission was not yet aware of the new Dutch law requiring each trailer which is not separately registered, to obtain a temporary Dutch registration number in order to carry goods/cargo through the Netherlands. Moreover, it seems, on the basis of the information currently available, that the registration procedure is not accessible to hauliers established in another Member State.

The Commission needs to examine this new law more closely in order to check its compatibility with the principles of free movement of goods and transport services. If necessary, the Commission may start infringement proceedings against the Netherlands in order to remove any unjustified obstacles to the free movement of goods and transport services, which could result from this new law.

The Commission will inform the Honourable Member of any further important development in this matter.

----
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2656

___________ John Smart; Sota Foods, Inc., d/b/a King * of Potatoes; John Smart & * Associates, Inc., * * Plaintiffs - Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of North Dakota. * Sunshine Potato Flakes, L.L.C., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant - Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 16, 2001 Filed: May 22, 2001

___________ Before LOKEN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. InAugust 1997, John Smart, John Smart & Associates, Inc., and Sunshine Potato Flakes, L.L.C., entered into an Exclusive Distributor Agreement containing a broad arbitration clause. The contractual relationship ended in January 2000, and arbitration proceedings commenced in which breach-of-contract claims and counterclaims have been asserted. John Smart and two of his companies filed this diversity action against Sunshine, alleging that a post-termination letter from Sunshine’s plant manager to1 The HONORABLE RODNEY S. WEBB, Chief Judge of the United States

District Court for the District of North Dakota. -2- customers was defamatory. Responding to a motion by Sunshine, the district court 1 enteredan order staying the lawsuit and directing the parties to arbitrate this dispute. The Smart plaintiffs appeal, arguing their defamation claims are not arbitrable. Absent a district court certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) -- and there was no such certification in this case -- an interlocutory order staying an action and directing arbitration is not appealable. See 9 U.S.C. § 16(b); Lebanon Chem. Corp. v. United Farmers Plant Food, Inc. , 179 F.3d 1095, 1102 (8th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellee’s motion for an award of costs and attorneys’ fees is denied. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
STATE of North Carolina v. David Anthony MANNO.

No. COA15-33.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Nov. 3, 2015.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Prejudicial Error at trial; Remanded for Recalculation of Prior Record Level and Resentencing.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeffrey Tryon COLLINGTON.

No. 290P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Kevin P. Bradley, Durham, Attorney at Law, for Collington, Jeffrey Tryon.

Donna B. Wojcik, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of August 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
HOWELL v. N.C. WAYNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

No. 326P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Burl Anderson Howell, La Grange, for Howell, Burl Anderson.

Michael T. Wood, Special Deputy Attorney General, for N.C. Wayne County Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

E.B. Borden Parker, Goldsboro, for N.C. Wayne County Department of Health and Human Services, et al.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of September 2015 by Petitioner-Appellant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         348,979               1,023,598
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,158,432                 720,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,007                  33,770
<INVENTORY>                                  1,962,137                 599,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,619,843               2,469,215
<PP&E>                                         688,837                 385,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                 257,434                 170,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,051,246               2,683,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,162,350                 676,451
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         9,142                   9,124
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,861,813               1,998,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,051,246               2,683,947
<SALES>                                      6,553,331               6,762,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,131,096               6,797,111
<CGS>                                        3,853,959               3,256,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,818,721               5,146,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,312,375               1,650,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                   493,816                 522,694
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            818,559               1,127,653
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   818,559               1,127,653
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09                     .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09                     .12
        




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1
<CURRENCY>                       US DOLLARS
       

<S>                                                 <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                            5,953,505
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,591,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                        983,154
<INVENTORY>                                       8,319,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 26,489,983
<PP&E>                                           26,261,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7,126,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   77,396,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12,045,965
<BONDS>                                          98,445,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            54,067,681
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              2,490
<OTHER-SE>                                      (89,932,489)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     77,396,571
<SALES>                                          28,614,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 28,614,667
<CGS>                                            13,468,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13,468,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 66,680,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14,501,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (63,419,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (63,419,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (63,419,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        




</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Victor Keith Wilson v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00509-CR

Trial court case number: 95-CV-0904

Trial court: 10th District Court of Galveston County

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above-referenced 

appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, 

filed a motion requesting access to a copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response 

to appointed counsel’s brief and an extension of time to file his response. We granted appellant’s 

motion, ordered that the trial court clerk provide appellant with a copy of the record, and extended 

appellant’s filing deadline. Appellant has filed a motion requesting a second extension of time to 

file his response to appointed counsel’s brief. Appellant argues that a second extension is necessary 

because the trial court clerk has not provided him with a complete copy of the appellate record.

We grant appellant’s motion for a second extension. If the trial court clerk has not already 

done so, the trial court clerk shall provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the 

reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to appellant no later than 10 days from the date 

of this order. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of 

this order, the date upon which delivery of the record to appellant is made.

Appellant’s pro se response to appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 40 days 

of the date of this order. No further extensions shall be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Harvey Brown_____

Acting individually 

Date: __November 20, 2018____
STATE v. STANLEY.

No. COA06-1669.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS23011, 05CRS23012).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.