alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10_1.htm


Purchase Agreement Between Source Gold Corp. and John Sadowski,


President, North Star Prospecting Inc.


 


Dated May 4, 2010 in the Province of Ontario, Canada.


 


Source Gold Corp. has purchased from John Sadowski, President North Star Prospecting Inc. the below listed 21 claims in Northern Ontario Canada for the amount of $51,800.


 


Claims:


 



	4243802	4243803	4243804	4243805	4243806	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	4254007	 4254008	4254009	4254010	4254011	4254013
	4253014	4253015	4254016	4254017	4254018	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	4243808	4243809	4243810	 	 	 





 


All claims are presently filed with the Ontario Ministry of Mines and Northern Development and are registered to John Sadowski.  The claims will be transferred to the name of Source Gold Corp. upon Source receiving its client number with the Ministry.


 


 



/s/ John Sadowski




John Sadowski


President, North Star Prospecting

#3 Bloomfield Trail


Richmond Hill Ontario L4E 2H8


 


 


/s/ Lauren Notar


Lauren Notar


President, Source Gold Corp.


2 Toronto Street, Suite 234


Toronto Ontario M5C 2B5
# Bishops and Priests (Consecration and Ordination of Women) Measure 2014

        - Previous
        - Next

E

# Bishops and Priests (Consecration and Ordination of Women) Measure 2014

# 2014 No. 2

A Measure passed by the General Synod of the Church of England to make provision for the consecration of women as bishops                        and for the continuation of provision for the ordination of women as priests; to repeal the Priests (Ordination of Women)                        Measure 1993; and for connected purposes.                     

[23rd October 2014]

## 1Provision for consecration of women as bishops and for continuation of provision for ordination of women as priestsE

(1)It shall be lawful for the General Synod to make provision by Canon for enabling women, as well as men, to be consecrated                        to the office of bishop if they otherwise satisfy the requirements of Canon Law as to the persons who may be consecrated as                        bishops.                  

(2)It shall continue to be lawful for the General Synod to make provision by Canon for enabling women, as well as men, to be                        ordained to the office of priest if they otherwise satisfy the requirements of Canon Law as to the persons who may be ordained                        as priests.                  

(3)The Priests (Ordination of Women) Measure 1993 is repealed.                  

Commencement Information

I1S. 1(1) in force at 14.11.2014 by S.I. 2014/4, **art. 2**

## 2Amendment of Equality ActE

In Schedule 6 to the Equality Act 2010, there is added at the end—
*“Bishops*
4The office of diocesan or suffragan bishop is not a public office.”.                  

## 3RepealsE

The enactments mentioned in the Schedule are repealed to the extent specified in the second column of the Schedule.

## 4Citation, commencement and extentE

(1)This Measure may be cited as the Bishops and Priests (Consecration and Ordination of Women) Measure 2014.                  

(2)This Measure comes into force on such day as the Archbishops of Canterbury and York may jointly appoint.                  

(3)Subject to subsections (4) and (5) this Measure extends to the whole of the Provinces of Canterbury and York except the Channel                        Islands and the Isle of Man.                  

(4)This Measure may be applied to the Channel Islands, as defined in the Channel Islands (Church Legislation) Measures 1931 and                        1957, or either of them, in accordance with those Measures.                  

(5)If an Act of Tynwald or an instrument made under an Act of Tynwald so provides, this Measure extends to the Isle of Man, subject                        to such exceptions, adaptations or modifications as may be specified in the Act of Tynwald or instrument.                  

Commencement Information

I2S. 4 in force at 14.11.2014 by S.I. 2014/4, **art. 2**

 Section 3

## SCHEDULEERepeals
**Exhibit
32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Hauppauge Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  ****Date: May 13, 2005
    
    /s/  Kenneth
      PlotkinKenneth PlotkinTitle: Chief Executive
      Officer
 ****/s/ Gerald
    TucciaroneGerald TucciaroneTitle: Chief Financial Officer and
      Treasurer
[ARTICLE] 9
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          SEP-30-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-1999
[CASH]                                               0
[INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS]                         7988900
[FED-FUNDS-SOLD]                                     0
[TRADING-ASSETS]                                     0
[INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE]                   74046236
[INVESTMENTS-CARRYING]                               0
[INVESTMENTS-MARKET]                                 0
[LOANS]                                       16152805
[ALLOWANCE]                                      30000
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               100110327
[DEPOSITS]                                    68084371
[SHORT-TERM]                                         0
[LIABILITIES-OTHER]                             777275
[LONG-TERM]                                   15000000
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                          8565
[OTHER-SE]                                    16306765
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY]               100110327
[INTEREST-LOAN]                                 605767
[INTEREST-INVEST]                              2346281
[INTEREST-OTHER]                                235310
[INTEREST-TOTAL]                               3187358
[INTEREST-DEPOSIT]                             1664274
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                             2081635
[INTEREST-INCOME-NET]                          1105723
[LOAN-LOSSES]                                     5000
[SECURITIES-GAINS]                               50218
[EXPENSE-OTHER]                                 480007
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 684982
[INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY]                           0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    413220
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                      .54
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .54
[YIELD-ACTUAL]                                       0
[LOANS-NON]                                          0
[LOANS-PAST]                                         0
[LOANS-TROUBLED]                                     0
[LOANS-PROBLEM]                                      0
[ALLOWANCE-OPEN]                                 25000
[CHARGE-OFFS]                                        0
[RECOVERIES]                                         0
[ALLOWANCE-CLOSE]                                30000
[ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC]                             30000
[ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN]                                  0
[ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED]                          30000
</TABLE>
STATE v. SANDERS.

No. COA07-1279.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Durham (03CRS57288).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 293/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 293/2014 of 21 March 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 293/2014                     

# of 21 March 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. LEWIS.

No. COA08-661.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Buncombe (06CRS9858, 06CRS57491, 06CRS57494, 06CRS57496, 06CRS57498).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
STATE v. Clinton Cebert SMITH.

No. 396A98-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 31, 2008.

Lisa Miles, Kimberly Swank, for Smith.

William Graham, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of November 2008 by State of NC to Dissolve Order Holding *23Time in which to File Certiorari Petition in Abeyance:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 31st day of December 2008."
Exhibit 10.1





Exhibit 10.1









CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT




	 	 	 
	BORROWER:

	 	Lender:
	WESTMORELAND RESOURCES, INC.

	 	FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
	PO BOX 449

	 	BILLINGS OFFICE-COMMERCIAL DEPT.
	HARDIN, MT 59034-0449

	 	401 NORTH 31st STREET
	 

	 	PO BOX 30918
	 

	 	BILLINGS, MT 59116






Date of Agreement: NOVEMBER 3, 2010

Note Number: 1100236355




Description of Existing Indebtedness: REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT SHOWING A
CURRENT PRINCIPAL BALANCE OF $12,600,000.00.



Description of Collateral: 10,000 SHARES OF WESTMORELAND RESOURCES STOCK
PLEDGED BY WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY AND ALL INVENTORY, CHATTEL PAPER,
ACCOUNTS, GENERAL INTANGIBLES AND EQUIPMENT OF WESTMORELAND RESOURCES, INC.



Description of Change in Terms: THE MATURITY DATE IS EXTENDED TO DECEMBER 18,
2010. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO REMAIN THE SAME.



Continuing Validity. Except as expressly changed by this Agreement, the terms of the original
obligation or obligations, including all agreements evidenced or securing the obligation(s), remain
unchanged and in full force and effect. Consent by Lender to this Agreement does not waive
Lender’s right to strict performance of the obligation(s) as changed, nor obligate Lender to make
any future change in terms. Nothing in this Agreement will constitute a satisfaction of the
obligation(s). It is the intention of Lender to retain as liable parties all makers and endorsers
of the original obligation(s), including accommodation parties, unless a party is expressly
released by Lender in writing. Any maker or endorser, including accommodation makers, will not be
released by virtue of this Agreement. If any person who signed the original obligation does not
sign this Agreement below, then all persons signing below acknowledge that this Agreement is given
conditionally, based on the representation to Lender that the non-signing party consents to the
changes and provisions of this Agreement or otherwise will not be released by it. This waiver
applies not only to any initial extension, modification or release, but also to all such subsequent
actions.



PRIOR TO SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, BORROWER READ AND UNDERSTOOD ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
BORROWER AGREES TO THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COMPLETED COPY OF THE
AGREEMENT.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	BORROWER: WESTMORELAND RESOURCES, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	BY:
	 	/s/ KEVIN PAPRZYCKI	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

KEVIN PAPRZYCKI, VICE PRESIDENT
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	FIRST INTERSTATE BANK	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	BY:

	 	/s/ STEVE TOSTENRUD 	 	BY:	 	/s/ SUSAN RIPLETT	 	 
	 

	 	 

STEVE TOSTENRUD, VICE PRESIDENT
	 	 	 	 

SUSAN M. RIPLETT, VICE PRESIDENT
	 	 





CHANGE IN TERMS
STATE v. BELL.

No. COA07-1017.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from Sampson (03CRS54808, 03CRS54809, 03CRS54810).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Steven Craig YOUNG.

No. 354P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 8, 2007.

Steven Craig Young, Pro Se.

Charles E. Reece, Assistant Attorney General, Sam Currin, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd day of July 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of November 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of August 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of November 2007."
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





For
      purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Anthony Principe, the chief
      financial officer of On2 Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies
      that, to his knowledge:





(i)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/
                ANTHONY PRINCIPEAnthony
                Principe*Chief
                Financial Officer**On2
                Technologies, Inc.*


April
      30,
      2007.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1469 

BRADY CONSTRUCTION INNOVATIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

----------------------------------------------------- 

2008-1057 

BRADY CONSTRUCTION INNOVATIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

R. Joseph Trojan, Trojan Law Offices, of Beverly Hills, California, argued for 

plaintiff-appellant and plaintiff-appellee. 

Paul A. Stewart, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, 

argued for defendant-appellee and defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Vito 

A. Canuso, III, and Michael K. Friedland. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California 

Chief Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2007-1469 

BRADY CONSTRUCTION INNOVATIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

-------------------------------------------------------------- 

2008-1057 

BRADY CONSTRUCTION INNOVATIONS, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. 

07-CV-217, Chief Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler 

__________________________ 

DECIDED: August 15, 2008 

__________________________ 

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER and MOORE, Circuit Judges. 

MICHEL, Chief Judge. 
2007-1469; 2008-1057 

2

 Brady Construction Innovations, Inc. (“Brady”) appeals from the district court’s 

summary judgment of invalidity. Order, Brady Construction Innovations, Inc. v. 

California Expanded Metal Products Company, No. 07-217 (C.D. Cal. June 13, 2007) 

(“Summary Judgment Order”). California Expanded Metal Products Company 

(“CEMCO”) appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion for attorneys’ fees. 

Order, Brady Construction Innovations, Inc. v. California Expanded Metal Products 

Company, No. 07-217 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 26, 2007) (“Fees Order”). We heard oral 

argument on July 7, 2008. For the reasons discussed in our opinion in Brady 

Construction Innovations, Inc. v. Perfect Wall, Inc., Nos. 2007-1460, -1486, we affirm 

both the district court’s summary judgment of invalidity and denial of attorneys’ fees.* 

 *

 CEMCO also sought attorneys’ fees under Rule 11 on the same basis as it 

sought fees under Section 285. The district court’s denial of a motion for Rule 11 

sanctions is reviewed for abuse of discretion. E.g., Q-Pharma, Inc. v. Andrew Jergens 

Co., 360 F.3d 1295, 1299 (Fed. Cir. 2004). We have reviewed CEMCO’s arguments as 

to attorneys’ fees as well as the correspondence in the record between CEMCO’s 

counsel and Brady’s counsel, and we conclude that the district court did not abuse its 

discretion in denying attorneys’ fees under Rule 11.
EXHIBIT 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AVP, Inc. hereby
certifies, to such officers' knowledge, that this Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of AVP, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies, in all
material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of AVP, Inc.


Dated:  May 15, 2006                    By: /s/ Leonard Armato
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Leonard Armato, Chairman
                                           and Chief Executive Officer


                                        By: /s/ Andrew Reif
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Andrew Reif, Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
BEADNELL, et al v. COASTAL COMMUNITIES AT OCEAN RIDGE PLANTATION, INC., et al.

No. 379A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Oct. 10, 2014.

C. Wes Hodges, II, Wilmington, For Berry, Donna, et al.

Sarah R. Buzzard.

J. Nicholas Ellis, Rocky Mount, for Branch Banking and Trust Company, et al.

David Dreifus.

Jacob H. Wellman, Raleigh, for Powell, James, et al.

**Opinion**

The following Order was entered:

Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31(a) and (b)(2) and Rule 15(e)(2) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court on its own initiative hereby certifies for review prior to determination in the *Court of Appeals Beadnell, et al. v. Coastal Communities At Ocean Ridge Plantation, Inc., et al.,* COA14-874. The case shall be docketed in this Court as of the date of this order. Briefs of the respective parties that have been submitted to the Court of Appeals shall be considered by this Court. Any party may file a new brief in this Court consistent with the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on
Form 10-K of Tier Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”), for the period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ronald W. Johnston, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:




1.
            This
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
  amended.




2.
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:  November
      10, 2009
            /s/
      Ronald W. JohnstonRonald
      W. JohnstonChief
      Financial Officer