alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RAIT Financial Trust (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel G. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |                                        
|------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|              |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel G. Cohen                    
|              |  |  |  | Daniel G. Cohen Chief Executive
Officer
|March 1, 2007 |  |  |  |
TRUHAN v. WALSTON, et al.

No. 364P14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 10, 2015.

Ann C. Ochsner, Raleigh, for Walston, Susan P.

Bryan T. Simpson, Natalia K. Isenberg, Raleigh, for Truhan, Daniel, et al.

Timothy W. Wilson, Rocky Mount, for North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company.

M. Greg Crumpler, Rocky Mount, for United Services Automobile Association.

Thomas H. Morris, Wilson, for Walston, Susan P., et al.

Donald E. Clark, Jr., Goldsboro, for Walston, David M.

James D. Secor, III, for Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company.

Jonathan M. Smith, Goldsboro.

Donald J. Dunn, Goldsboro, for Truhan, Daniel Joseph.

Fred Baggett, for N.C. Association of Chiefs of Police.

Amy Y. Bason, General Counsel, for N.C. Association of County Commissioners.

Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney, Sharon J. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney, for New Hanover County.

*63Lowell L. Siler, Durham, for Durham County.

Angela I. Carmon, for City of Winston Salem.

R. Michael Cox, Pasquotank County Attorney, for Pasquotank County.

Debra Bechtel, for Catawba County.

Sam Shames, for Gaston County.

John F. Henning, Jr., Franklin, for Town of Franklin.

Wesley L. Deaton, for Lincoln County.

Huey B. Marshall, Bolivia, for Brunswick County.

Edmond W. Caldwell, Jr., Executive Vice President and General Counsel, for N.C. Sheriffs' Association.

Leon M. Killian, III, Raleigh, for Haywood County.

Chester M. Jones, Franklin, for Macon County.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of October 2014 by City of Winston Salem for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th of June 2015."
# CE2004088EN.01031401.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/314 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/314

---

(2004/C 88 E/0319)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0106/03

by Luciano Caveri (ELDR) to the Commission

(28 January 2003)

Subject:   Fire in the Mont Blanc tunnel

Subject:

While the French judiciary continues its enquiry into the notorious fire which caused the deaths of 39 people in the Mont Blanc tunnel on 24 March 1999, great concern has been aroused by the news that there may have been a defect in the Volvo lorry which caught fire inside the tunnel and triggered the tragedy. Suspicions centre on a construction fault on a certain model of lorry, which is said to result in the lorry catching fire in the event of a cigarette end entering the air intake. Does the Commission have any information on this matter?

Answer given by M. Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(20 March 2003)

(20 March 2003)

The Commission has not been informed of any developments in the investigation being conducted by the French authorities to determine the full circumstances of how this disaster occurred, as the matter is still sub judice. The Commission is, however, familiar with a number of official reports which establish the facts and are in the public domain. The Commission is aware, for instance, that the disaster began with a fire breaking out in a semi-trailer towing vehicle a few minutes after it had driven through the Chamonix toll-station. Various possible explanations have been put forward as to how this fire actually started in the towing vehicle. At the moment, none of these theories can be either confirmed or ruled out, and it is up to the experts appointed by the examining magistrate to check their relevance.

On 30 December 2002 the Commission submitted a proposal for a Directive on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the trans-European road network, in order to prevent such accidents and to protect tunnel users.

The Commission also intends to make it mandatory for hand-held fire extinguishers or fire extinguishing systems to be fitted in all vehicles with a maximum mass of more than 3,5 tonnes. It will also endeavour to resolve the safety problems posed by the additional fuel tanks which may be mounted on heavy goods vehicles.

Lastly, in the course of 2003, the Commission will submit a proposal to extend Community type-approval to commercial vehicles. In the meantime, type-approval of such vehicles remains the responsibility of each Member State and national regulations apply to the construction standards governing such vehicles.

---
STATE v. HAMMONDS.

No. COA08-350.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Robeson (05CRS50311, 05CRS50312, 05CRS50313).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the annual report of Colombia Energy Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned principal executive officer of
the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 30, 2012



|/s/ Ronald G. Stovash                      | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|Ronald G. Stovash, Chief Executive Officer | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)              |
1

 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006-CR-8524, styled The State of Texas v. Arthur Dukes, pending

in the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Roman presiding.

iii i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00608-CR

IN RE Arthur DUKES

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. Lopez, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 27, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On August 12, 2008, Arthur Dukes filed two original petitions for a writ of habeas corpus

in this court. Dukes represents that he is confined in jail awaiting trial and has not been prosecuted

in a timely manner. Thus, he seeks immediate release. This court, however, as an intermediate court

of appeals, is not authorized to grant the relief requested. 

Pursuant to section 22.221(d) of the Texas Government Code, in civil matters, a court of

appeals “may issue a writ of habeas corpus when it appears that the restraint of liberty is by virtue

of an order, process, or commitment issued by a court or judge because of the violation of an order,

judgment, or decree previously made, rendered, or entered by the court or judge in a civil case.”

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (Vernon 2004). However, in criminal matters, a court of
04-08-00608-CR

-2-

appeals has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction. Watson v. State, 96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex.

App.—Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d); Ex parte Hearon, 3 S.W.3d 650, 650 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999,

orig. proceeding); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.).

In criminal matters, the courts authorized to issue writs of habeas corpus are the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art.

11.05 (Vernon 2005). 

Additionally, Dukes is represented by counsel in the trial court. We conclude trial counsel

is also Dukes’s counsel for an original proceeding on the issue presented. Dukes is not entitled to

hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The

absence of a right to hybrid representation means Dukes’s pro se petition will be treated as

presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). 

Accordingly, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
In the Matter of D.M.B.

No. COA15-315.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Oct. 20, 2015.

**Case Reported Without Published Opinion**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          72,510
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,226
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               423,616
<PP&E>                                      12,248,827
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,166,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,784,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          407,868
<BONDS>                                      5,366,193
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,307,041
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,701,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,784,166
<SALES>                                        477,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               485,410
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             88,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                  19,998
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,847
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on
Form 10-Q of LIN Television Corporation for the period  ended  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the undersigned,  Gary R. Chapman,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
William A. Cunningham, Vice President-Controller, Deborah R. Jacobson, Vice President
of Corporate Development and Treasurer,  and Peter E. Maloney, Vice
President of Finance of the Company, each hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |                                                              
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2002 | By: /s/ Gary R. Chapman                                      
|                       |                                                              
|                       | Gary R. Chapman                                              
|                       | Chief Executive Officer                                      
|                      
|                      
|                       |                                                              
|Dated: August 14, 2002 | By: /s/ William A. Cunningham                                
|                       |                                                              
|                       | William A. Cunningham                                        
|                       | Vice President and Controller                                
|                       |                                                              
|                      
|                      
|Dated: August 14, 2002 | By: /s/ Deborah R. Jacobson                                  
|                       |                                                              
|                       | Deborah R. Jacobson                                          
|                       | Vice President of Corporate
        Development and Treasurer
|                       |                                                              
|                      
|                      
|Dated: August 14, 2002 | By: /s/ Peter E. Maloney                                     
|                       |                                                              
|                       | Peter E. Maloney                                             
|                       | Vice President of Finance
# CE2004070EN.01021702.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/217 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/217

---

(2004/C 70 E/234)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3103/03

by Anna Karamanou (PSE) to the Commission

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   Child soldiers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Subject:

The recruitment of child soldiers in the course of the seven-year war in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has had tragic consequences, resulting in the mistreatment and death of thousands of these children, some of them less than 12 years of age.

According to the Amnesty International report published on 9 October 2003 in Brussels concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo and child soldiers, the forcible recruitment of children, who are then put through punishing training sessions, assigned to arduous and highly dangerous duties and suffer sexual abuse by fellow soldiers and their officers, is standard practice.

What measures will the Commission take to ensure respect for human rights, international agreements on the protection of children's rights and compliance with the 1999 Lusaka Agreement on the cessation of hostilities and to oblige the transitional government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to end the recruitment of child soldiers and take the necessary measures to ensure the full reintegration into society of those who have undergone this traumatic experience?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(18 November 2003)

(18 November 2003)

The Commission is concerned by the phenomenon of recruitment of child soldiers during the seven year war in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and its tragic consequences for the children.

This is one of the reasons why the Commission is participating in the regional ‘Multi-Country Demobilization and Reintegration Programme’ (MDRP) administered by the World Bank with a contribution of EUR 20 million. The purpose of this programme is to demobilize and reintegrate ex-combatants of the greater Great Lakes Region, including the DRC. Child soldiers are included in the programme. Special measures will be taken to ensure their proper reintegration into society.

MDRP special projects have been developed which particularly relate to the needs of child ex-combatants. It is also expected that the National Demobilisation and Reintegration Programme for the DRC will include a specific focus on children.

More broadly, the Commission promotes respect of human rights and international agreements on the protection of children's rights through its on going project of support to the justice sector in the DRC for EUR 28 million. This programme is being reoriented in the framework of the new Congolese Transitional process to respond to the problem of impunity and non respect of human rights, especially in the East part of the country.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          75,719
<SECURITIES>                                26,704,952
<RECEIVABLES>                                  732,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,516,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          691,693
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,824,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,516,552
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               924,717
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                873,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                   873,810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            873,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   873,810
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
GOOD NEIGHBORS OF OREGON HILL PROTECTING PROPERTY RIGHTS and Ashley M. Wyatt v. COUNTY OF ROCKINGHAM.

No. 298A15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

G. Nicholas Herman, Chapel Hill, for County Of Rockingham.

Robert V. Shaver, Jr., County Attorney, for County of Rockingham.

Wayne E. Crumwell, Reidsville, for Good Neighbors of Oregon Hill Protecting Property Rights, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal in which there is a dissent from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 20th of August 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals.

> "Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 20th of August 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

> *79"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
STATE v. Juli Ann WILLIAMS.

No. 173P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Charlotte G. Blake, Boone, for Williams, Juli Ann.

Harriet F. Worley, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th of May 2015 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."