alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.2

RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.

Certification of Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of 
Reckson Associates Realty Corp.,the Sole General Partner of the Registrant, 
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code

I, Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the sole general partner of Reckson Operating Partnership, L. P. (the
Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                  

|                              |    |                                                                                                                                                               
|----------------------------- | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                              |    |                                                                                                                                                               
|Dated:
      November 7, 2005 | By | / s / Michael Maturo                                                                                                                                          
|                              |    |                                                                                                                                                               
|                              |    | Michael Maturo,
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of Reckson Associates Realty
Corp., the sole general partner of the Registrant

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reckson Operating Partnership, L. P. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ February 16, 2024

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2022

- 1885

GEORGE DAVID MOBERLY, Claimant

- Appellant

v.
DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________
Issued : February 9, 2024 Judgment

______________________ Please make the following change : On page 2, change “P ER C URIAM (M OORE , Chief Judge
, S TOLL and B ENCIVENGO , Circuit Judges )” to

-- P ER C URIAM (M OORE , Chief Judge
, S TOLL , Circuit Judge
, and B ENCIVENGO , District Judge 1 ).

--

1 Honorable Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. Case: 22-1885 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 02/16/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,190
<INVENTORY>                                     17,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,120
<PP&E>                                       2,976,177
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,313,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,002,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          211,191
<BONDS>                                      1,203,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,011
<OTHER-SE>                                     557,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,002,281
<SALES>                                        397,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               399,079
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               436,111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (265,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (87,955)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (177,396)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (177,396)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.76)
        

</TABLE>
EDMUNDSON EX REL. SMITH v. LAWRENCE.

No. COA08-83.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Wilson (02CVS2318).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40079

Conference Calendar

JERRY LEWIS DEDRICK

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JODY R UPTON, Warden

Respondents-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CV-971

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry Lewis Dedrick, federal prisoner # 27140-180, appeals the district

court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his guilty plea

conviction and sentence for aiding and abetting the possession of more than 50

grams of cocaine base with intent to distribute. The district court denied

Dedrick’s § 2241 petition because he had not shown that his claims satisfied the

requirements of the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 savings clause. Dedrick argues that the

district court should have construed his § 2241 petition as a second or successive

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40079

2

§ 2255 motion and transferred it to this court as a motion for authorization to

file a successive § 2255 motion. Dedrick also argues that the indictment was

“bogus”; he was never in possession of the cocaine base; and he is actually

innocent of the enhanced sentence because he did not receive notice concerning

the career criminal enhancement. 

In order to satisfy the criteria of § 2255’s savings clause, Dedrick must

show that his claims are based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court

decision which establishes that he may have been convicted of a nonexistent

offense and that the claims were foreclosed by circuit law at the time when they

should have been raised at trial, on appeal, or in an initial § 2255 motion. See

Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Dedrick has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of

Dedrick’s § 2241 petition is AFFIRMED. To the extent that Dedrick seeks

authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion raising the above claims, the

motion is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255(h).
IN RE I.A.A.

No. COA08-492.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 16, 2008.

Certification Date October 6, 2008.

Appeal from Randolph (05JT84, 07JT27).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
SANDY MUSH PROPERTIES, INC. and Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. RUTHERFORD COUNTY, by and through The RUTHERFORD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS.

No. 67PA07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Roy H. Michaux, Jr., Charlotte, Ann M. Anderson, for Sandy Mush Properties.

Forrest A. Ferrell, Warren. Hutton, Stephen L. Palmer, Hickory, Walter H. Dalton, Elizabeth Thomas Miller, Rutherfordton, for Rutherford County.

Prior report: 181 N.C.App. 224, 638 S.E.2d 557.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the second petition filed on the 22nd day of January 2008 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Plaintiffs shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
ex41.htm



Exhibit 4.1


 


 




 


[Insert Company Letterhead w/ Address]


 







November 19, 2010


 







[Warrant Holder]:








	
Re:

	
Extension of Warrant Expiration Date












Dear Warrant Holder:







According to our records, you are the holder of certain warrants (the “Warrants”) issued by Constitution Mining Corp. in one or more private offerings of securities made in reliance on exemptions provided in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  The Warrants were issued with an expiration date of [Insert Current Expiration Date] (the “Expiration Date”).  The Company has extended the Expiration Date to [Insert Extended Expiration Date].







The Company represents and warrants to each of the holders of the Warrants that all necessary corporate action to authorize the extension of the Expiration Date has been taken and the Company has full power and authority to issue this letter.







For our records, please acknowledge receipt of this letter and your consent to the extension of the Expiration Date of the Warrants to [Insert Extended Expiration Date] by countersigning this letter where indicated below and returning a copy of this letter to the Company at the address provided above.













	
Constitution Mining Corp.


 


	  
	  
	
  /s/       Michael Stocker                                           


	
Name:  Michael Stocker


	
Title:    Chief Executive Officer



























The undersigned investor acknowledges


and agrees to the terms of this letter:












_________________________________


Name:


Date:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), announces the establishment of the Board of Scientific Counselors for Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute (Board).

This Committee shall advise the Director, NIH; the Deputy Director for Intramural Research, NIH; the Director, National Cancer Institute (NCI); and the Scientific Director, NCI, on the intramural research programs through periodic visits to the laboratories for assessment of the research in progress, the proposed research, and evaluation of the productivity and performance of tenured, tenure track and staff scientist and physicians.

This Board will consist of 30 members, including the Chair, appointed by the Director, NCI, from authorities knowledgeable in the fields of laboratory, clinical and biometric research, clinical cancer treatment, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention and control research in the fields of interest to NCI.

Duration of this committee is continuing unless formally determined by the Director, NIH, that termination would be in the best public interest.

Dated: August 30, 2005.

Elias A. Zerhouni,

Director, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 05-17937 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

JAMES FRANKS, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

TREVOR WINGARD, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 65 EM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
# CE2004070EN.01006201.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/62

---

(2004/C 70 E/064)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1755/03

by Caroline Jackson (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(27 May 2003)

Subject:   Taxation on European pension contributions

Subject:

A British national, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon, has taken out a private pension through the Medical Council in Germany which presently offers a guaranteed minimum pension. He is, therefore, not contributing to a UK pension scheme.

He now finds that he is expected to pay tax to the British authorities on his German pension contributions.

Does this comply with EU law? What is the Commission's view of the possibility of creating a flexible pensions market within the EU if national authorities are allowed to act in this way?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(17 July 2003)

(17 July 2003)

The conditions for tax deductibility of non-obligatory pension contributions are set by each Member State under its respective tax and pensions policy. While such matters fall within the competence of the Member States, they must nevertheless exercise that competence consistently with Community law. Thus the conditions for tax deductibility may not place restrictions on the free movement of persons or the free provision of services, in particular by discriminating on grounds of nationality.

The Commission has serious doubts about the compatibility with the EC Treaty of the United Kingdom rules as far as they limit tax deductibility of contributions to domestic occupational pension schemes. The Commission will take appropriate action following up its Communication on the elimination of tax obstacles to the cross-border provision of occupational pensions (1). Infringement proceedings have already been initiated in relation to other Member States (2). Moreover, the Commission has made contact with the surgeon in question to assess the details of his case.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 8.6.2001.

1

(2)  See press release IP/03/179.

2

---
CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersignedhereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of LSB Financial Corp. (the "Registrant") that theQuarterly Report of the Registrant of Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained in such report fairly present, in all material respects, theconsolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results ofoperations of the Registrant for such period.

| Date | November 14, 2002 |  | /s/ Randolph F. Williams                                        |
|------|-------------------|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|      |                   |  | Randolph F. Williams, President(Principal Executive Officer)         |
| Date | November 14, 2002 |  | /s/ Mary Jo David                                               |
|      |                   |  | Mary Jo David, Treasurer[Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
----

(2004/C 65 E/230)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2777/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 September 2003)

Subject:   Use of the Aromanian, Albanian, Slavo-Macedonian and Pomak languages in Greece

In her answer to my Question No E-1710/03 (1) on the European Bureau for Lesser-Used Languages (EBLUL), Commissioner Reding stated, inter alia, that: ‘The minority language groups in the Union were identified by researchers and the results published in 1996 in the Euromosaic study. (...) On page 41 of the English version of this study a reference is made to the existence of Aromanian, Albanian and Slavo-Macedonian in Greece, each of which has an estimated number of speakers of between 50 000 and 80 000.’

In response to my request for precise information about members of the EBLUL committees, the Commissioner referred me to the EBLUL website.

I am therefore obliged to repeat my question and to ask a number of new questions:

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(23 October 2003)

With regard to the first question, the Commission refers the Honourable Member to its answers to his Written Questions E-1140/03 (2) and E-1710/03 (3). The European Bureau for Lesser-Used Languages (EBLUL) is an independent non-government organisation, and its national committees are independent bodies constituted at the level of each Member State.

The Euromosaic study was funded following an invitation to tender and was carried out by independent experts duly identified in the published report.

Concerning the second question, the three managers of the report, Peter Nelde (Onderzoekscentrum voor Meertaligheid, Katholieke Universiteit Brussel), Miquel Strubell (Direcció General de Política Lingüística, Barcelona) and Glyn Williams (Research Centre Wales, Bangor), worked with an expert committee comprising ten members from the EU, the United States and Canada.

Besides the general report published by the Commission in 1996, entitled Euromosaic: the production and reproduction of the minority language groups in the European Union, and quoted by the Commission in its answers to the Honourable Member's two previous questions, the same team produced more than 50 individual reports, all with the same structure, on each of the language communities.

Regarding the last question, the role of the Bureau is specified on its website (4):

As teaching and education systems are the full responsibility of the Member States, pursuant to Article 149 of the EC Treaty, the educational situation of Pomak children in Greece is the exclusive responsibility of the Greek State.

----

(1)OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 218.

(2)OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 176.

(3)OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 218.

(4)  http://ww2.lingualia.net:8080/agares/eblul

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Pierre Boutros, being an officer of The Bank of New York, a New York Banking
Corporation, the Trustee in respect of the S&P-Linked Investment Trust
Certificates, Series 1997-SP-1 Trust (the "Trust"), certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect
         of the Trust in respect of periods covered by this annual report of
         the Trust;

      2. Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports,
         taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material
         fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
         made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
         made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
         annual report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution information
         required to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by
         the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for
         inclusion in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

      4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
         the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
         based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the Trustee
         has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

Date: March 29, 2004


         /s/ Pierre Boutros
------------------------------------------
Pierre Boutros, Assistant Treasurer


                                       8
STATE v. HOUSTON.

No. COA07-126.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 18, 2007

Certification Date January 7, 2008.

Appeal from Catawba (04CRS15348).

Decision without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS


     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form
     10-QSB  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information  contained
     in such report fairly represents,  in all material respects,  the financial
     condition and results of operations of the Company.


     August 21, 2006                               August 21, 2006


     /s/ Jeffrey L. Minch                          /s/ Troy D. Zinn
     --------------------                          ----------------
     Jeffrey L. Minch,                             Troy D. Zinn,
     President and Chief Executive Officer         Secretary and Treasurer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


                                       25
1The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1256

___________

Elmer C. Oberhellmann, a trustee of *

an ERISA defined benefit pension plan, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Kristin Petersen Oberhellmann, a * [UNPUBLISHED]

trustee and fiduciary of the ERISA *

defined benefit pension plan, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: January 11, 2001

Filed: January 19, 2001

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, and KYLE,1 District

Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.
2The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

The District Court2 dismissed plaintiff Elmer C. Oberhellmann's lawsuit with

prejudice as a sanction for plaintiff's repeated, knowing failure to adhere to the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff appeals. Having reviewed the case, we are

thoroughly satisfied the District Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing

plaintiff's case with prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.