alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004088EN.01002001.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/20

---

(2004/C 88 E/0019)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1148/03

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject:   Seychelles

Subject:

The executive power and ruling party's stranglehold on life in the Seychelles, threats to human rights and the restrictions on the press of the opposition, drug trafficking and money laundering are repeatedly denounced.

What steps have been taken by the Commission, under the auspices of the Cotonou Agreement and the EU's stated objectives on human rights and democracy, to improve democratisation and good governance in the Seychelles?

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 31, 2021

NO. 03

- 21

- 00487

- CV

Darrell J. Harper , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAK ER, AND SMITH

DISMISSED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

Having reviewed the record, the Court finds that the appeal should be dismissed. Therefore,

the Court dismisses the appeal. No costs of appeal shall be assessed in this Court or in the

court below.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40851

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN MANUEL MORENO-QUIROZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-445-1

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

TheFederalPublic Defender appointed to represent Juan Manuel MorenoQuiroz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Moreno-Quiroz has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. John Joseph ZINKAND.

No. 314P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Mark Montgomery, Durham, for Zinkand.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 661 S.E.2d 290.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of July 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ES-960-1910-BJ-4789] ES-053726, Group No. 27, Illinois 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Illinois. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 

The lands we surveyed are:

## Fourth Principal Meridian, Illinois 

T. 13 S., R. 1 W.

The plat of survey represents the survey of a portion of the Lock and Dam No. 26 acquisition boundary on an island in the Mississippi River in Township 13 South, Range 1 West, of the Fourth Principal Meridian, in the State of Illinois, and was accepted September 2, 2005. We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be made available to the public as a matter of information. 

Dated: September 2, 2005. 

Stephen D. Douglas, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor. 

[FR Doc. 05-17974 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

A pril 6 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk April 6 , 2016

15 3 074 ( 48 )

SHELBY TOWNSHIP

, Petitioner

- Appellant,

SC: 15 3 074

v COA: 32 3481

MER C: 1 2

- 0 00067

COMMAND OFFICERS ASSOCIATION

OF MICHIGAN

, Charging Party

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of the Michigan Municipal League and

the Public Corporation Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan to participate as amicus

curiae and file a joint amicus brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on April 1

, 2016 , is accepted for filing

.
EXHIBIT 23


                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by  reference  in  this  Form 10-K of our report  dated  March  26,  1999
included  in Registration Statement File Nos. 333-43475, 333-56821,  333-
63471,  333-67755, 333-67757 and 333-68101.  It should be noted  that  we
have  not  audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent  to
December  31,  1998 or performed any audit procedures subsequent  to  the
date of our report.



/s/Arthur Andersen LLP

Houston, Texas
March 30, 1999
STATE v. RICH

No. COA06-1273

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Cumberland (06CRS10910).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
SCHNEIDER NAT. CARRIERS, INC. v. STREULI SALES, INC.

No. COA06-959

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Guilford (05CVS8016).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1270/2014Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1270/2014 of 28 November 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning            restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence            of Ukraine         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1270/2014                     

# of 28 November 2014

# implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening                        the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions                           undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine(1), and in particular Article 14(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 17 March 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

(2)In view of the continued gravity of the situation on the ground in Ukraine, the Council considers that additional persons                              and entities should be added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures                              as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

(3)Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The persons and entities listed in the Annex to this Regulation shall be added to the list set out in Annex I to Regulation                     (EU) No 269/2014.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 November 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

## ANNEXU.K.List of persons and entities referred to in Article 1

### **Individuals**U.K.

### **Entities**U.K.

1

OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.
**EXHIBIT 4.31
Schedule identifying material details of warrants issued by the CompanySubstantially identical to the Warrant filed in Exhibit 4.30

 

 
DATE				WARRANT	NUMBER OF		EXERCISE PRICEISSUED	WARRANT HOLDER		NO.	SHARES		EXPIRATION DATE1/31/00	Leonard H. Timmel		E-1	50,000		Exercise price:  $3.00							Expires:  1/31/20031/31/00	Satya P. Garg		E-2	100,000		Exercise price:  $3.00							Expires:  1/31/2003
 

NOTE:  All share amounts and exercise prices reflect pre-split values.

 **
# CE2004088EN.01059601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/596 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/596

---

(2004/C 88 E/0609)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0277/03

by Brian Simpson (PSE) to the Commission

(7 February 2003)

Subject:   Soda ash imports

Subject:

Will the Commission investigate the dumping of soda ash by the USA into the EU market? Further, will the Commission support the retention of the import tariffs on this product during the future WTO round but ensure that if tariffs do have to be removed, it is done in a phased and controlled way?

Answer given by Mr Lamy on behalf of the Commission

(10 March 2003)

(10 March 2003)

As regards the dumping of soda ash by the United States into the European market, the Commission wants to inform the Honourable Member that anti-dumping proceedings are conducted on the basis of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the Community (1), which states that a Community industry has to file a complaint with the Commission. This complaint should contain sufficient evidence as regards injury and dumping. So far, no such complaint has been received. In the event that such information is brought to the attention of the Commission, the evidence will of course be examined expeditiously.

1

As regards the current multilateral negotiations under the Doha Development Agenda, the Community proposes that all World Trade Organisation (WTO) Members agree to reduce all tariff duties considerably by compressing them into a flatter range of tariffs to eliminate tariff peaks and high tariffs. Given that the main goal of this round is sustainable development, and since exceptions and further sheltering of sectors can only result in distortions and costs that developing and least developed countries can ill afford, the mechanism shall apply without sheltering of any sector. This does not prevent the Community, though, from proposing implementation timetables that are in keeping with our economic sensitivities.

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996.

1

---
ROGERS v. BLACK.

No. COA07-462.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 5, 2008.

Certification Date February 25, 2008.

Appeal from Harnett (01CVD2274).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed, remanded for correction of clerical mistakes.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00555

- CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF CHARLES INNESS THRASH, AN INCAPACITATED

PERSON

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PC

- 2912

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The App ellee s ’ M oti on for Extension of Ti me to F i le Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

appellee s ’ brief is due on or be fore April 3, 2020.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of February, 2020

.

___________________________________ M i chael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
STATE of North Carolina v. Steven Dean BOBBITT.

No. 606P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Rudolph A. Ashton, III, New Bern, for Bobbitt.

Dana B. French, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of December 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*54"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted 
from the financial statements of The Associated Group, Inc. as of
and for the six months ended June 30, 1997 included in Form 10-Q 
for the quarter ending June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                              4,039
<SECURITIES>                            0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                       6,301
<ALLOWANCES>                        2,535
<INVENTORY>                         1,581
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   15,572
<PP&E>                             56,908
<DEPRECIATION>                     27,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    601,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             154,598
<BONDS>                             7,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                            1,878
<OTHER-SE>                        260,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      601,971
<SALES>                               307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   11,901
<CGS>                                 211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       7,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    5,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      554
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  3,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (60,628)
<INCOME-TAX>                      (12,504)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (48,124)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (48,124)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (2.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
<FN>
<F1>Does not include $495,181 of noncurrent marketable equity securities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AVP, Inc. hereby
certifies, to such officers' knowledge, that this Amendment No. 1 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AVP, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006
fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in this amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AVP, Inc.

Dated:  August 16, 2006

                                         By:/s/ Leonard Armato
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             Leonard Armato
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                         By:/s/ Andrew Reif
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             Andrew Reif
                                             Chief Financial Officer
----

(2004/C 65 E/174)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2468/03

by Catherine Stihler (PSE) to the Commission

(24 July 2003)

Subject:   Introduction of digital tachographs

Regulation (EEC) 3820/85 (1) lays out the rules relating to the acceptable driving, resting and working times of drivers of commercial vehicles and buses. The hours of such drivers are recorded and controlled by use of tachographs in accordance with Regulation (EEC) 3821/85 (2). More recently Regulation (EC) 2135/98 (3) was published, paving the way for the introduction of digital tachographs (which record on smart cards) in place of the current tachographs (which record on paper charts).

Article 2, paragraph 1 (a) of Regulation 2135/98 states:

Would the Commission please confirm that the act referred to in this paragraph is that which was published as Regulation (EC) 1360/2002, published on 5 August 2002 (4)?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(24 September 2003)

Herewith the Commission confirms that Commission Regulation (EC) No 1360/2002 (5) is the act referred to in Article 2, paragraph 1 (a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2135/98 (6).

----

(1)OJ L 370, 31.12.1985, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 370, 31.12.1985, p. 8.

(3)OJ L 274, 9.10.1998, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 207, 5.8.2002, p. 1.

(5)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1360/2002 of 13 June 2002 adapting for the seventh time to technical progress Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport, OJ L 207, 5.8.2002.

(6)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2135/98 of 24 September 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport and Directive 88/599/EEC concerning the application of Regulations (EEC) No 3820/84 and (EEC) No 3821/85, OJ L 274, 9.10.1998.

----
Opinion issued July 28, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00408-CV

———————————

IN RE JOSEPH ANDRE DAVIS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Joseph Andre Davis, acting pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

regarding an underlying suit affecting the parent-child relationship.1 We deny the 

petition. We dismiss the motion to stay filed in conjunction with the petition as 

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.

 

1

The underlying case is In the Interest of J.A.D., a Child, cause number 2014-

58410, pending in the 245th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable 

Roy L. Moore presiding.
John E. JONES and wife, Frances E. Jones v. George D. ROBBINS, Jr., Maxine Robbins Brinkley, and husband, Martin C. Brinkley, Mary P. Coston, Brian F. Coston and wife, Tracy H. Coston, William H. Cook and wife, Jacqueline L. Cook, William H. Robbins, Jr., Corbett Industries, Incorporated, Blue Banks Plantation, LLC, and First Baptist Church of Wilmington, North Carolina, successor in interest to the estate of James H. Smith.

No. 267P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Richard M. Morgan, Wilmington, for Corbett Industries.

Lawrence S. Craige, Wilmington, for John & Frances Jones.

William N. Mason, Wilmington, for George Robbins, Jr.

Clay A. Collier, Wilmington, for First Baptist Church.

Henry L. Kitchin, Jr., David Huffine, Wilmington, for Blue Banks Plantation.

Maxine Robbins Brinkley, Pro Se.

Martin C. Brinkley, Pro Se.

Brian F. Coston, Pro Se.

Tracy H. Coston, Pro Se.

William H. Cook, Pro Se.

Jacqueline L. Cook, Pro Se.

William H. Robbins, Jr., Pro Se.

Mary P. Coston, Pro Se.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 660 S.E.2d 118.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of June 2008 by Respondent (Corbett Industries) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          33,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,492
<INVENTORY>                                     64,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,132
<PP&E>                                         873,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,979,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,485
<BONDS>                                      1,311,589
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       749,902
<OTHER-SE>                                   (220,267)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,979,974
<SALES>                                        738,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               738,113
<CGS>                                          202,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  728,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (110,393)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,294
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (117,687)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (8,207)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (125,894)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.11)

        

</TABLE>