alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

d0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

137846 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137846 

 COA: 278138 

Saginaw CC: 06-027522-FH 

MCKINNEY MUSHATT, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of People v Idziak (Docket No. 137301) is pending on appeal before this Court and 

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case.
Mark HUEBNER v. TRIANGLE RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE, a North Carolina Corporation, and Thaddeus K. Szostak.

No. 513P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

John M. Kirby, Raleigh, for Huebner.

Norman B. Smith, Greensboro, for Triangle Research, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 667 S.E.2d 309.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th day of November 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
# C_2023127EN.01002901.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/29

---

Appeal brought on 28 February 2023 by Swissgrid AG against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 21 December 2022 in Case T-127/21, Swissgrid v Commission

(Case C-121/23 P)

(2023/C 127/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Swissgrid AG (represented by: P. De Baere, P. L'Ecluse, K. T'Syen and V. Lefever, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claim that the Court should:

| — | set aside the order under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order under appeal;

| — | dismiss the Commission’s plea of inadmissibility and declare the action for annulment admissible, and refer the case back to the General Court for judgment on the merits of the action; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the Commission’s plea of inadmissibility and declare the action for annulment admissible, and refer the case back to the General Court for judgment on the merits of the action;

| — | reserve judgment as to the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve judgment as to the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on three pleas in law.

First plea: the General Court erred in law by applying an incorrect legal test for deciding whether the decision contained in a letter of 17 December 2020 signed by the Director of the Commission’s Directorate-General for Energy (‘the contested decision’) constitutes a challengeable act under Article 263 TFEU.

Second plea: the General Court erred in in law by asserting that Articles 1(6) and 1(7) of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 of 23 November 2017 establishing a guideline on electricity balancing (1) do not confer rights upon the appellant, which are capable of being affected by the contested decision.

Third plea: the order under appeal lacks an adequate statement of reasons to support the determinative finding that Article 1(7) of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 does not confer any rights on the appellant.

---

(1)  OJ 2017 L 312, p. 6.

---
STATE v. Terry Lee DIX.

No. 551P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 18, 2008.

Charles Reece, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC,

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 669 S.E.2d 25.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of December 2008 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 18th day of December 2008."
BARTON, et al v. COASTAL COMMUNITIES AT OCEAN RIDGE PLANTATION, INC., et al.

No. 377A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Oct. 10, 2014.

C. Wes Hodges, II, Wilmington, for Brigham, Craig, et al.

Sarah R. Buzzard.

J. Nicholas Ellis, Rocky Mount, for Branch Banking and Trust Company, et al.

David Dreifus, Raleigh.

Jacob H. Wellman, Raleigh, for Powell, James, et al.

**Opinion**

The following Order was entered:

Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31(a) and (b)(2) and Rule 15(e)(2) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court on its own initiative hereby certifies for review prior to determination in the *Court of Appeals Barton, et al. v. Coastal Communities At Ocean Ridge Plantation, Inc., et al.,* COA14-872. The case shall be docketed in this Court as of the date of this order. Briefs of the respective parties that have been submitted to the Court of Appeals shall be considered by this Court. Any party may file a new brief in this Court consistent with the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.
STATE v. MABRY.

No. COA08-729.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 3, 2009.

Certification Date March 23, 2009.

Appeal from Stanly (05CRS5906, 05CRS5907, 05CRS5908, 05CRS5909, 05CRS5910, 05CRS5911, 05CRS5912, 05CRS5913, 05CRS52890, 05CRS52891, 05CRS52892, 05CRS52893, 05CRS52894, 05CRS52895, 05CRS52896, 05CRS52897, 07CRS563, 07CRS564, 07CRS565, 07CRS50127, 07CRS50128, 07CRS50129).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part, vacated in part, remanded for resentencing.
----

----

----

|   | CALAIS RESOURCES, INC. |                             |
|--------|------------------------|----------------------------------|
|   |                   |                             |   |
|   | By:                    | /s/ Tom Hendricks           |   |
|   |                   | Tom Hendricks, President and CEO |   |
|   |                   |                             |   |
|   |                   |                             |   |

|   | ESTATE OF JOHN W. SNYDER |                                  |
|--------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                     |                                  |   |
|   | By:                      | /s/ Steve Snyder                 |   |
|   |                     | Steve Snyder, Personal Representative |   |
|   |                     |                                  |   |
|   |                     |                                  |   |

----

----
**EXHIBIT 23** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statement    Nos. 333-139551,333-37207,333-54440    and    333-64135 on    Form S-8    of our report dated February 20, 2007, relating to the    consolidated financial statements and financial statement    schedules of CNA Surety Corporation and subsidiaries (which    report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an    explanatory paragraph relating to the changes in the method of    accounting for defined benefit postretirement plans and for    stock-based    compensation in 2006), and of our report dated February 20,    2007 on management’s report on the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this    Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of CNA Surety Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended    December 31, 2006.      /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP     Chicago, Illinois    February 20, 2007
Peter M. HALL; Peco, Inc.; Airport Road Apartments, a Limited Partnership; Alliance-Carolina Tool & Mold Corporation; Carolyn Mitchell Benfield, Trustee of the Bill J. Benfield Family Trust dated February 1, 2001; Blue Ridge Plating Company, Inc.; Jack Ray Ferguson; Fusco, LLC; Hobson Construction Co., Inc.; William H. Hobson; Investment Warehousing, Inc.; J.C. Steele and Sons, Inc.; Matthew A. Jenkins and Roberta Jenkins, Co-Trustees of the Jenkins Family Trust Created May 24, 1978; Metaltreat, Inc.; OVP Holdings, LLC; Ramsey Group, Inc.; Traymar Enterprises, Inc.; Wellington Mobile Home Park, Inc., Petitioners v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE, a North Carolina Municipal Corporation, Respondent. Asheville Endocrinology Consultants, P.A.; Asheville Endocrinology Properties, LLC; Barbetta, LLC; BCD Properties, LLC; BCL, LLC; Bethesda Land and Development, LLC; Continental Teves, Inc.; Doctor J., LLC; Charles E. Hester, Sr. and wife, Barbetta G. Hester; Hometrust Bank; Hope-A Women's Cancer Center, P.A.; JMS Developers, LLC; Ridgefield IV, LLC; Ridgefield Business Center Property Owners Association, *131Inc.; Ridgefield Investments, LLC; Ridgefield Properties, L.L.C.; Ridgefield Women's Cancer Center Properties, LLC; Telco Community Credit Union; Tootland, LLC; Nathan E. Williams, Petitioners v. City of Asheville, a North Carolina Municipal Corporation, Respondent.

No. 408P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

George Ward Hendon, Matthew S. Roberson, Asheville, for Peter Hall, et al.

Robert W. Oast, Jr., City Attorney, William F. Slawter, Asheville, for City of Asheville.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of September 2008 by Petitioners in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
----

(2004/C 33 E/270)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2393/03

by Bill Miller (PSE) to the Commission

(21 July 2003)

Subject:   The Commission's White Paper ‘A New Impetus for European Youth’

Hostels in the Bavarian region of Germany currently impose age limits of 26 years old on visitors in order for the hostel to be eligible for tax exemption. How will this White Paper affect the current age limit stipulated by the Bavarian region of Germany? Is it legal for them to impose age limits in the first place? It is currently the only region in Germany to allow age limits in hostels.

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(27 August 2003)

The White Paper on youth (1), ‘A New Impetus for European Youth’ aims at suggesting a new framework for cooperation in youth policy. This new framework, which includes the open method of cooperation, was endorsed by the Council in its Resolution of 27 June 2002 (2) and applies to the four thematic political priorities: participation, information, a greater understanding of youth and voluntary activities.

The White Paper is therefore a first step towards an enhanced cooperation in the youth field and can only deal with a certain number of thematic priorities identified by young people, thereby fully respecting the Member States' subsidiarity in this field. The White Paper aims at giving major political orientations on youth in Europe and does thus not tackle tax questions.

----

(1)  COM(2001) 681 final.

(2)  Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, Meeting within the Council of 27 June 2002 regarding the framework of European cooperation in the youth field (OJ C 168, 13.7.2002, p. 2).

----
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of LSB Financial Corp. (the "Registrant") that the QuarterlyReport of the Registrant of Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such report fairly present, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant forsuch period.

| Date | May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Randolph F. Williams                                        |
|------|--------------|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|      |              |  | Randolph F. Williams, President(Principal Executive Officer)         |
| Date | May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Mary Jo David                                               |
|      |              |  | Mary Jo David, Treasurer[Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Agreement, by and between diaDexus, Inc. and Dako North America, Inc.



  
 Exhibit 10.27

 [*] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential
treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. 
 [*] 

AGREEMENT BETWEEN 
  

			
	Dako North America, Inc.	  	diaDexus, Inc.
	6392 Via Real	  	343 Oyster Point Blvd.
	Carpinteria, California 93013 USA.	  	S. San Francisco, CA 94080

 diaDexus, Inc., uses your
product(s) in the manufacture of in vitro diagnostic test kits which are regulated as an in vitro diagnostic by the Food and Drug Administration. We are requesting that your company agree to notify diaDexus, Inc. of any proposed changes in the above
stated components prior to implementation and shipment. 
 The product(s) supplied by Dako is [*] in diaDexus production process. Therefore,
should Dako choose in its sole discretion, to discontinue the manufacture and/or distribution of [*]. In addition, upon request from diaDexus, Dako shall permit reasonable quality systems audits by the FDA or a mutually agreed third party.

 This Agreement shall [*] from the date of the last signature below and [*] unless one of the parties provides the other with ninety
(90) days written notice of intent to terminate. 
 If there are any issues, problems or concerns with any product or specific lot number
that you have shipped to us including proposed changes, future correspondences can be directed to “QUALITY ASSURANCE, diaDexus, Inc., 343 Oyster Point Blvd., S. San Francisco, CA 94080. If you want to contact us by phone (650-246-6400), please
direct any concerns to Quality Assurance. Please follow-up any phone contact with written notification. Thank you for your cooperation. 
  

					
	 Julie Blacklock
	  		 	 /s/ A. J. Farmilo

	Quality Assurance, diaDexus, Inc.	  		 	Director of OEM, Americas, Dako
			
	 /s/ Julie Blacklock
	  		 	 A. J. Farmilo

	Signature	  		 	Signature
			
	 2006-08-01
	  		 	 12 July 2006

	Date	  		 	Date
			
	 Robert L. Wolfert
	  		 	
	Officer, diaDexus, Inc.	  		 	
			
	 /s/ Robert L. Wolfert
	  		 	
	Signature	  		 	
			
	 Aug. 1, 2006
	  		 	
	Date	  		 	

 Retain one copy for your files and return one signed copy to our Quality Assurance Department. 

 
 343 Oyster Point Blvd
• South San Francisco, CA • 94080 U.S.A. 
 PHONE: 650-246-6400    FAX:
650-246-6499 







  

									
	 diaDexus, Inc. Received in QA
	 	By:	 	 /s/ Julie Blacklock
	  		 	Date: 2006-08-01


  
  

343 Oyster Point Blvd • South San Francisco, CA • 94080 U.S.A. 

PHONE: 650-246-6400    FAX: 650-246-6499
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
PetroFina S.A.:
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
PetroFina S.A. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-61145) of our report dated January 26,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Petrofina Delaware,
Incorporated as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, stockholder's equity and cash flows for the years then
ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 Annual Report on Form 20-F
of PetroFina S.A.
 
/s/ KPMG LLP
 
April 27, 1999
Dallas, Texas
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 384/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 384/2014 of 3 April 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications (Crème de Bresse (PDO))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 384/2014                     

# of 3 April 2014

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Crème de Bresse                        (PDO))                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Crème de Bresse’                              was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Crème de Bresse’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 April 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.4. Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.)**U.K.

#### FRANCEU.K.

Crème de Bresse (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 335, 16.11.2013, p. 16.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.88


JOHN F. MCCARTHY
2546 NORTH VERMONT STREET
ARLINGTON, VA 22207
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Tom Tanis
Chief Executive Officer
Syndicated Food Service International, Inc.
11830 Windcreek Overlook
Alpharetta, Georgia 30005

                                                               January 23, 2003

Dear Tom:

         This letter agreement will confirm our telephone conversation
yesterday in which we agreed that I will perform approximately 40 hours per
month of consulting services for Syndicated Food Service, International, Inc.
to facilitate the completion of delinquent SEC filings, arrange for financing
for the company and generally be available to advise you with regard to
corporate "clean-up" issues. This will be on a month-to-month basis and my
monthly fee will be $2,500.00. The first payment to be returned with a copy of
this executed letter agreement and each subsequent payment to be made thirty
days thereafter until this agreement is terminated by either party.

         I am looking forward to working with you and your team.


                                                Sincerely,

                                                /s/ John F. McCarthy

                                                John F. McCarthy


Agreed & Acknowledged


/s/ Tomas P. Tanis
----------------------------------

Tom Tanis
Chief Executive Officer
Syndicated Food Service International, Inc.
<PAGE>

I, John F. Corcoran:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CNA Surety
Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 15, 2004

/s/ JOHN F. CORCORAN
---------------------------------------------------------
John F. Corcoran
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                                        90