alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Active Power, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
S. Gino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


                                    /s/  David S. Gino
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    David S. Gino
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    March 7, 2003
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 706 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the MA Regional 

Plan Stabilization Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2007 

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal 

the MA Regional Plan Stabilization Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MA REGIONAL PLAN STABILIZA4 TION FUND. 

5 (a) PURPOSE OF SECTION.—The purpose of this sec6 tion is to reduce the Federal budget deficit and to more 

7 efficiently use taxpayer dollars in health care spending. 

8 (b) REPEAL OF MA REGIONAL PLAN STABILIZATION

9 FUND.— 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•S 706 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 

2 1858 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w– 

3 27a) is repealed. 

4 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

5 1858(f)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1395w–27a(f)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘subject to 

7 subsection (e),’’. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (b) shall take effect on the date of enactment 

10 of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
DUNSTONE FINANCIAL, LLC v. SIMMONS.

No. COA08-748.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (07CVD 13568).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
----

(2004/C 33 E/225)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2117/03

by Claude Moraes (PSE) to the Commission

(25 June 2003)

Subject:   Data Protection Directive

The Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC (1)) was adopted EIGHT years ago in 1995.

Will the Commission please give details of which Member States have not yet implemented the Data Protection Directive?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(23 July 2003)

The Honourable Member inquires which Member States have not yet implemented the Data Protection Directive, Directive 95/46/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. All Member States have notified implementing measures to the Commission. France notified the data protection law of 1978 while announcing its intention to pass a new law that is not yet adopted.

The Honourable Member can find more details about the implementation of the Data Protection Directive in the report recently adopted by the Commission (2) (15 May 2003).

----

(1)OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.

(2)  http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/privacy/lawreport/data-directive_en.htm.

----
----

(2004/C 65 E/252)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2876/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(29 September 2003)

Subject:   Promotion of healthy eating habits at school

Reliable medical research shows a large increase in the number of those suffering from heart complaints and type Β diabetes in the EU Member States, largely due to bad diet and overweight.

Given that eating habits are acquired from an early age, being greatly influenced not only by the home but also the school environment and the type of food served by school canteens:

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(16 October 2003)

The Commission is very much aware of the importance of nutrition as a determinant for positive health. This is reflected in the Public Health Action Programme (2003-2008), which foresees strategies and measures on nutrition as a life-style related health determinant. Moreover, the 2003 Work Plan for this programme foresees the development of innovative measures and approaches to improve dietary habits and physical activity habits in all population groups.

A particular concern in this area are the dietary habits of children. Concretely, the Community has been providing funding on a continuous basis for the European Network of Health Promoting Schools (ENHPS), a common initiative of the Council of Europe, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Commission. One of the objectives of this project is to promote healthy dietary habits in schools throughout Europe. More information on this project can be found at the following Internet: site: http://www.who.dk/eprise/main/WHO/Progs/ENHPS/Home

An important new project in this area, which the Commission is currently considering for funding, is the initiative on ‘Children, obesity and associated avoidable chronic diseases’, which is co-ordinated by the European Heart Network. This large-scale pan-European project will examine all ‘obesogenic’ factors in the environment of children, including the school environment.

Both these projects clearly address the Declaration of the Winning Hearts conference of 2000, which stated that every child born in the new millennium has the right to live until the age of at least 65 without suffering from avoidable cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this context, the Commission would also like to underline that the main priority of the incoming Irish Presidency in the Public Health area is CVD prevention.

As far as the composition of school meals is concerned, the Community has no mandate for adopting binding legislation in this area. However, the initiatives outlined above, and the dissemination of their results, will contribute to raise awareness on children's diets.

----
Exhibit 4.2


 


LENTUO
INTERNATIONAL INC.


 


	
  Number

  	
  Share(s)

  
	
   

  	
  -            -

  



 


Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands


 


Share capital is US$50,000
divided into 50,000 Shares of US$1.00 each


 


THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [name of shareholder] is the registered
holder of [no. of share] Share(s) in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and
Articles of Association thereof.


 


GIVEN UNDER the common seal
of the said Company on                                    2010.                         .


 


THE COMMON SEAL of the said
Company was hereunto affixed in the presence of:


 


	
  DIRECTOR

  	
   

  	
   

  



 

















 


TRANSFER


 


I                                                                                                                                                        
(the Transferor) for the value received DO HEREBY transfer to
                                                                                                                                      
(the Transferee) the
                                                                                                                                               
shares standing in my name in the undertaking called LENTUO
INTERNATIONAL INC.


 


To hold the same unto the Transferee


 


 


Dated


 


 


Signed by the Transferor


 


in the presence of:


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Witness

  	
   

  	
  Transferor
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         717,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  203,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    346,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,267,563
<PP&E>                                      13,889,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,157,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,301,036
<BONDS>                                     10,758,502
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,892
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,335,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,157,012
<SALES>                                      7,120,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,120,151
<CGS>                                        2,814,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,814,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,072,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             143,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (910,736)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (62,237)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (848,499)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
STATE v. BATTLE.

No. COA08-580.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from Edgecombe (07CRS6708, 07CRS6709).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1998 
<CASH>                                                           61,805 
<SECURITIES>                                                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0 
<INVENTORY>                                                           0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 61,805 
<PP&E>                                                                0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               21,208,152 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         2,294,519 
<BONDS>                                                      14,422,597 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         4,024,176 
<PREFERRED>                                                           0 
<COMMON>                                                            355 
<OTHER-SE>                                                       22,505 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 21,208,152 
<SALES>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0 
<CGS>                                                                 0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 76,210 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               74,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (140,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     56,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (84,516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0 
<CHANGES>                                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (84,516)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (.20)
        

</TABLE>
1

NUMBER 13-15-00315-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. STEPHEN B. TYLER

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, the State of Texas ex rel. Stephen B. Tyler, Criminal District Attorney of 

Victoria County, Texas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency 

stay in the above cause on July 13, 2015. Relator seeks to compel the trial court to 

empanel a jury to conduct the sentencing hearing in this matter and to prohibit the trial 

court from entering a judgment in the case until such has occurred. The petition was filed 

while the sentencing hearing was in progress and relator has now informed us that the 

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

hearing has already concluded. Specifically, relator has filed a “Notice of Mootness of 

Mandamus Petition” informing us that the trial court has completed the hearing to which 

the mandamus petition pertained. The relator states that it “may file a subsequent writ” 

dealing with this matter “in the near future,” but this petition and the corresponding motion 

for an emergency stay have been rendered moot.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, the relator must show: (1) that he has no 

adequate remedy at law, and (2) that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act. In re 

State ex rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117, 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. proceeding). If 

the relator fails to meet both of these requirements, then the petition for writ of mandamus 

should be denied. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Jud. Dist. Ct. of App. at Texarkana, 236 

S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). A remedy at law, though it 

technically exists, "may nevertheless be so uncertain, tedious, burdensome, slow, 

inconvenient, inappropriate, or ineffective as to be deemed inadequate." Greenwell v. Ct.

of App. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 648–49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) 

(orig. proceeding). The act sought to be compelled must be a ministerial act that does 

not involve a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young, 236 S.W.3d at 210. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus 

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that the petition for writ of mandamus should be 

dismissed as moot. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for 

emergency relief are DISMISSED AS MOOT without regard to the merits and without 

prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

 

PER CURIAM
3

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

13th day of July, 2015.
# CE2004088EN.01060202.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/602 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/602

---

(2004/C 88 E/0618)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0981/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Livorno

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Livorno, urgently need to use European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions, nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and culture,

can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Livorno has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Livorno has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Livorno has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Livorno has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                    CNA SURETY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                            SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                                              (DATE OF
                                                                                             INCEPTION),
                                                             YEAR ENDED      YEAR ENDED        THROUGH
                                                            DECEMBER 31,    DECEMBER 31,    DECEMBER 31,
                                                                1999            1998            1997
                                                            ------------    ------------    -------------
                                                            (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S>                                                         <C>             <C>             <C>
Net Income..............................................      $56,498         $45,515          $10,996
                                                              =======         =======          =======
Shares:
Weighted average shares outstanding.....................       43,957          43,625           43,294
  Weighted average shares of options exercised..........           17              97                8
                                                              -------         -------          -------
Total weighted average shares outstanding...............       43,974          43,722           43,302
  Effect of dilutive options............................          146             153              250
                                                              -------         -------          -------
Total weighted average shares outstanding, assuming
  dilution..............................................       44,120          43,875           43,552
                                                              =======         =======          =======
Earnings per share......................................      $  1.28         $  1.04          $  0.25
                                                              =======         =======          =======
Earnings per share, assuming dilution...................      $  1.28         $  1.04          $  0.25
                                                              =======         =======          =======
</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 341/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 341/2014 of 1 April 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 341/2014                     

# of 1 April 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. JONES.

No. COA08-606.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (06CRS229547).

Case reported without published opinion. No Prejudicial Error.