alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10141

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE CONTRERAS-HERNANDEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-185-ALL

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Contreras-Hernandez appeals his 56-month sentence imposed after

he pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States, in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326. He has filed a motion to supplement the record with his

sentencing memorandum. The motion to supplement is granted.

Contreras-Hernandez argues that his sentence is unreasonable because

the district court considered his arrest record when determining the point within

the advisory sentencing guidelines range that he should be sentenced.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-10141

2

Contreras argues that his general objection to the unreasonableness of his

sentence preserved this argument.

To avoid plain-error review, an appellant “must raise a claim of error with

the district court in such a manner so that the district court may correct itself

and thus, obviate the need for our review.” United States v. Rodriguez, 15 F.3d

408, 414 (5th Cir. 1994) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see

United States v. Hernandez-Martinez, 485 F.3d 270, 272 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

128 S. Ct. 325 (2007). Contreras’s objection to the reasonableness of his sentence

did not sufficiently preserve the argumentthat he now asserts; as a result, plain

error review applies. See Hernandez-Martinez, 485 F.3d at 273. To establish

plain error, a defendant must demonstrate error that is clear and obvious and

that affects his substantial rights;then we may exercise discretion to correct the

forfeited error if it “seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation

of judicial proceedings.” Id. at 273.

The district court did not plainly err in sentencing Contreras. The record

does not demonstrate that the district court relied on Contreras’s prior arrests

in fashioning his sentence. Moreover, Contreras fails to present any evidence to

rebut the presumption of reasonableness attached to his within-guidelines

sentence. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006); Rita v.

United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-65 (2007). The judgment of the district

court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT GRANTED.
STATE v. Gregory Aldon PERKINS.

No. 332PA14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 29, 2015.

Glenn Gerding, Chapel Hill, for Perkins, Gregory Aldon.

Anita LeVeaux, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2015 by Defendant for Judicial Notice:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th of July 2015."
DISCOVER BANK v. Kimberly CALHOUN.

No. 467P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Kimberly Calhoun, Pro Se.

Christina A. Taylor, for Discover Bank.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of October 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
Exhibit 31.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Audrey Williams, being an officer of The Bank of New York, a New York
Banking Corporation, the Trustee in respect of the S&P-Linked Investment Trust
Certificates, Series 1997-SP-1 Trust (the "Trust"), certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            Trust in respect of periods covered by this annual report of the
            Trust;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as
            a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
            or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
            provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by the Trustee
            under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement for inclusion
            in such distribution reports is included in such reports; and

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and
            based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in such reports, the
            Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

Date: March 21, 2007


      /s/ Audrey Williams
-----------------------------------
Pierre Boutros, Assistant Treasurer
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 736/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 736/2014 of 4 July 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 736/2014                     

# of 4 July 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 July 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. HERBERT.

No. COA06-1698.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS101907).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
Jorge RODRIGUEZ-CARIAS v. NELSON'S AUTO SALVAGE & TOWING SERVICE.

No. 231PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Thomas E. Davis, for Auto Salvage & Towing.

Alice Tejada, Raleigh, for Rodriguez-Carias.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of June 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

HUDSON, J., recused.
Exhibit 32.2

RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.

Certification of Michael Maturo,
    Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
  Reckson Associates
    Realty Corp.,Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
  States Code

I, Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| | 1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                             

Dated: August 8, 2005

| | By | /s/ Michael Maturo                   
| | -- | -------------------------------------
| |    |                                      
| |    | Michael Maturo,                      
| |    | Executive
Vice President,            
| |    | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reckson Associates Realty Corp. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3602 

To authorize funding for the National Crime Victim Law Institute to provide 

support for victims of crime under Crime Victims Legal Assistance Programs as a part of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. KYL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize funding for the National Crime Victim Law 

Institute to provide support for victims of crime under 

Crime Victims Legal Assistance Programs as a part of 

the Victims of Crime Act of 1984. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION. 

4 Section 103(b) of the Justice for All Act of 2004 

5 (Public Law 108–405; 118 Stat. 2264) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 

7 following: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3602 IS

1 ‘‘(1) $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010, 

2 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 to the Office for Vic3 tims of Crime of the Department of Justice for 

4 United States Attorneys Offices for Victim/Wit5 nesses Assistance Programs only for victim advo6 cates and their administrative support to provide di7 rect services to victims of crimes;’’; and 

8 (2) by striking paragraphs (3) and (4) and in9 serting the following: 

10 ‘‘(3) $500,000 for each of the fiscal years 2010, 

11 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 to the Office for Vic12 tims of Crime of the Department of Justice for staff 

13 to administer the appropriation for the support of 

14 organizations as designated under paragraph (4); 

15 ‘‘(4) $11,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 

16 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, to the Office for 

17 Victims of Crime of the Department of Justice, for 

18 the National Crime Victim Law Institute to provide 

19 legal counsel and support services for victims in 

20 criminal cases for the enforcement of crime victims’ 

21 rights in Federal jurisdictions, and in States and 

22 tribal governments that have laws substantially 

23 equivalent to the provisions of chapter 237 of title 

24 18, United States Code; and’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
# C_2023304EN.01002301.xml

| 28.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/23

---

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2023 — Konings v EUIPO — Manuel Busto Amandi (MAY GOLD)

(Case T-112/23) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)

(2023/C 304/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Konings NV (Zonhoven, Belgium) (represented by: K. Neefs, S. de Potter and T. Baetens, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P.-F. Karamolegkou and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Manuel Busto Amandi, SA (Villaviciosa, Spain) (represented by: J. Vicente Martínez, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 November 2022 (Case R 1778/2021-4).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Konings NV and Manuel Busto Amandi, SA shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Konings NV and Manuel Busto Amandi, SA shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 17.4.2023.

---
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN Television Corporation.
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Vincent
L. Sadusky, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard J.
Schmaeling, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:






(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







Dated:
August 10,
2009                      /s/ Vincent L.
Sadusky


Vincent L. Sadusky


President and Chief Executive Officer








Dated:
August 10,
2009                      /s/ Richard J.
Schmaeling


Richard J.
Schmaeling


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
STATE EX REL. COOPER v. STATE PROPERTIES, LLC.

No. COA08-779.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (07CVS20574).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
# CE2004078EN.01037301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/373 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/373

---

(2004/C 78 E/0393)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1541/03

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(7 May 2003)

Subject:   Outlawing the production of equipment for capital punishment and torture

Subject:

The Commission's proposal for a Council Regulation concerning trade in certain equipment and products which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (1) does not impose any restrictions on the use, production, marketing and sales within the internal market of the equipment and products concerned.

1

Given that capital punishment is banned under EU Treaties, why did the Commission not include proposals to outlaw the production of equipment that can be used for such purposes in the EU in this proposed regulation?

---

(1)  COM(2002)770.

1

---
----

(2004/C 70 E/011)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3469/02

by Ward Beysen (NI) to the Commission

(6 December 2002)

Subject:   The concentration on the Czech electricity market in the process of enlargement

Currently, the Czech government is preparing a concentration of competitors through an acquisition by the joint stock company CEZ a.s. of shares in eight regional electricity distribution companies from the National Property Fund. This has been published in the Commercial Bulletin on 24 July 2002.

On the one hand, this initiative will constitute a vertical integration of generation and supply of electricity on the Czech markets; on the other hand will this also create horizontal integration of the distributors. As a result, the new CEZ-Group will control more than 70 % of the generation and 2/3 of the national electricity supply.

Therefore, it is useful to clarify following questions:

Answer given by Mr. Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(28 January 2003)

The Commission continues to monitor developments in the energy sector of the Czech Republic with reference to the energy ‘acquis’ and the competition policy obligations of the Czech Republic under the Europe agreement and in the framework of the commitments made in the accession negotiations.

However, the concentration referred to by the Honourable Member is subject to the jurisdiction of the Czech competition authorities, since the Union merger regulation applies only to companies with a minimal turnover of EUR 250 million in the Community.

Subject to the above, the following remarks can be made in response to the questions which have been raised.

The policy pursued by the Czech government is not in contradiction with the competition/liberalisation ‘acquis’ in the Union. Some European companies in the electricity sectors are vertically integrated and the European Union liberalisation directives currently in force in these sectors only require separate management and accounts, not legal or ownership unbundling. The Commission's proposals for a new Directive on the electricity and gas markets would in addition require legal unbundling but this already exists in the Czech Republic.

The Czech electricity transmission operator is an independent legal entity, which is compatible with the Directive 96/92/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity (1).

----

(1)OJ L 27, 30.1.1997.

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 52980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17620]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Ohio Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that a conference 
call of the Ohio Advisory Committee will convene at 1 p.m. and adjourn 
at 3 p.m., Friday, September 16, 2005. The purpose of the conference 
call is to provide orientation to new members, approve the report 
``Hate Crime in Ohio Revisited,'' and plan future activities.
    This conference call is available to the public through the 
following call-in number: 1-800-473-7796, contact name: Lynwood Battle. 
Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to 
the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not 
initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines and 
the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur 
no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line 
connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the 
proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-
8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and 
contact name.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting 
Constance M. Davis, Regional Director of the Midwestern Regional 
Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights at (312) 353-8311, (TDD 312-
353-8362), by 4 p.m. on Wednesday, September 14, 2005.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, August 25, 2005.
Ivy L. Davis,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 05-17620 Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Exhibit 8.1



Subsidiaries of Industrias
Bachoco S.A.B. de C.V.



The following chart lists each of our subsidiaries
which we owned, directly or indirectly, as of December 31, 2014, and April 28, 2015:



| | 1. | Aviser, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | --------------------



| | 2. | Bachoco, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | ---------------------



| | 3. | Bachoco Comercial, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | -------------------------------



| | 4. | Campi Alimentos, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | -----------------------------



| | 5. | Operadora de Servicios de Personal, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------



| | 6. | PEC LAB, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | ---------------------



| | 7. | Secba, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | -------------------



| | 8. | Sepetec, S. A. de C.V.
| | -- | ----------------------



| | 9. | Servicios de Personal Administrativo, S.A. de C.V.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------



| | 10. | Induba Pavos, S.A de C.V.
| | --- | -------------------------



| | 11. | Bachoco USA, LLC and Subsidiaries
| | --- | ---------------------------------



Each of the Subsidiaries listed is incorporated under the laws of
Mexico, except by Bachoco USA, LLC and Subsidiaries.