alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P. for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, I, Thomas E.
Legro, Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of JMC Selkirk,
Inc., as Managing General Partner of Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  (1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Selkirk Cogen
Partners, L.P. May 11, 2004
    
    /s/ THOMAS E. LEGROThomas E. Legro
Vice President, Controller and
    Chief Accounting Officer
JMC Selkirk, Inc.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to JMC Selkirk, Inc. and will be retained by JMC Selkirk, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Sabas IBARRA.

No. 227P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Charlotte Blake, Boone, for Ibarra.

Joseph Finarelli, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of May 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
STATE v. WARD.

No. COA08-524.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from New Hanover (05CRS52472).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 24.3
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



                  KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE  PRESENTS  that the  undersigned,  whose
signature appears below, constitutes and appoints Adolph J. Ferro and Gilbert N.
Miller,  or either of them as his true and  lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent,
with full  power of  substitution  and  resubstitution  for him and in his name,
place and  stead,  in any and all  capacities,  to sign Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended  September  30, 1999,  and any  amendments  thereto,  pursuant to the
requirements  the Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and to file
the same with the United  States  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  and the
Nasdaq Stock Market.

                  DATED  8th  day of November 1999.
                        -----


                                    /s/ Pierre Lefebvre
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Pierre Lefebvre
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3597 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3597


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2008

                Referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To provide that funds allocated for community food projects for fiscal 
       year 2008 shall remain available until September 30, 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMUNITY FOOD PROJECTS.

    (a) Technical Correction.--Section 4406(a)(7) of the Food, 
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-234; 122 Stat. 
1902) is amended by striking ``Food and Nutrition Act of 2008'' and 
inserting ``Food Stamp Act of 1977''.
    (b) Allocation of Funds.--Funds allocated under section 25(b) of 
the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2034(b)) for fiscal year 2008 
shall remain available until September 30, 2009, to fund proposals 
solicited in fiscal year 2008.

            Passed the Senate September 25 (legislative day, September 
      17), 2008.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference of our report on Oralabs
Holding Corp. dated February 24, 1999 in the Registration Statement on Form S-8,
as  included  in the  Oralabs  Holding  Corp.'s  Form  10-KSB for the year ended
December  31,  1998  and  to  all  references  to  our  firm  included  in  such
Registration Statement.





March 29, 1999
----------------
Denver, Colorado


                                      /s/  Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman P.C.
**Exhibit 10.14**

 

**AMENDMENT TO THE**

**UNOVA, INC. RESTORATION PLAN**

 

This amendmentto the UNOVA, Inc. Restoration Plan (the “Plan”) is made in accordancewith Section 11.1 of the Plan, and is effective as of the dates providedherein.

 

1.             Section 3.6of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof:

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, and solely for purposes of the 2002calendar year, Annual Compensation shall also include all amounts of cashcompensation payable in the 2002 calendar year, whether as base salary or bonusamounts, that an Affected Employee elects to forgo in order to receive stockoptions pursuant to a Board resolution granting stock options to officers ofUNOVA, Inc. in lieu of cash compensation.

 

2.             ThePlan is amended by adding the following Supplement A at the end thereof:

 

Supplement A - Open Windows and Other SpecialBenefits 

 

A.1.         CorporateOffice Open Windows.  Effective foryears beginning on or after January 1, 2000, and notwithstanding anythingto the contrary in the Plan, the Board may, by resolution, extend to certainAffected Employees a package of benefits, including certain enhancements ofexisting benefits under the Plan, as well as under other pension and retirementplans and arrangements sponsored by the Company, as an inducement to make adecision to retire from the Company. Eligibility criteria for such benefits shall be set forth in suchresolution.  If specified in suchresolution, such enhancements shall include (a) deeming an eligibleAffected Employee to have satisfied the vesting requirement of Section 6.4,and (b) calculating and distributing to such Affected Employee the AnnualBenefit as described under Section 6.1 without the reduction otherwisedescribed in Section 6.2.  As aresult, the Annual Benefit in such case would commence as soon as ispracticable after the Termination of Employment of such Affected Employee.

 

A.2.         Special BenefitRelating to Daniel S. Bishop

 

Effective July 30, 2004, the Annual Benefit payable to Daniel S.Bishop shall be calculated and distributed as described under Section 6.1without the reduction otherwise described in Section 6.2.  As a result, the Annual Benefit payable to Mr. Bishopshall commence as soon as is practicable after such date.

 

----

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, UNOVA, Inc., by its duly authorized representatives, has causedthis Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf on this     day of August, 2004.

 
|    | UNOVA, INC.      |
|---------|------------------|
|    |             |
|    | By               | /s/ MICHAEL E. KEANE |   |
|    | Michael E. Keane |
|    |             |
| WITNESS |             |   |   |
|    |             |
|    | By               | /s/ KENNETH L. COHEN |   |
|    | Kenneth L. Cohen |
|    |             |
| WITNESS |             |   |   |
|         |                  |  |  |  |  |

 

2

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN Television
Corporation. for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Gary R. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, William A.
Cunningham, Vice President and Controller, Deborah R. Jacobson, Vice President
of Corporate Development and Treasurer, and Peter E. Maloney, Vice President of
Finance, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      /s/Gary R. Chapman
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2002            Gary R. Chapman
                                    Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/William A. Cunningham
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2002            William A. Cunningham
                                    Vice President and Controller

                                      /s/Deborah R. Jacobson
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2002            Deborah R. Jacobson
                                    Vice President of Corporate Development and
                                    Treasurer

                                      /s/Peter E. Maloney
                                    --------------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2002            Peter E. Maloney
                                    Vice President of Finance
# The Renewables Obligation (Amendment) Order 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

E+W

Statutory Instruments

# 2014 No. 893

Electricity, England And Wales

# The Renewables Obligation (Amendment) Order 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

31st March 2014

Coming into force

1st April 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Order revoked (1.12.2015) by The Renewables Obligation Order 2015 (S.I. 2015/1947), **art. 95(1)(b)(v)**
# The Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) Order 2014

        - Previous
        - Next

E+W+S

Statutory Instruments

# 2014 No. 504

Clean Air, England

# The Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) Order 2014

Made

5th March 2014

Laid before Parliament

6th March 2014

Coming into force

6th April 2014

The Secretary of State makes the following Order in exercise of the powers conferred by section 21 of the Clean Air Act 1993(1).                        

The Secretary of State is satisfied that the fireplaces exempted by this Order can be used for burning fuel other than authorised                           fuels(2) without producing any smoke or a substantial quantity of smoke.                        

## Citation, application and commencementE+W+S

1.  This Order—                  

(a)may be cited as the Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) Order 2014;                  

(b)applies in England; and                  

(c)comes into force on 6th April 2014.                  

## Fireplaces exempted from the provisions of section 20 of the Clean Air Act 1993E+W+S

2.  The fireplaces listed in the Schedule are exempt from the provisions of section 20 of the Clean Air Act 1993 (prohibition                     on emission of smoke in smoke control area), subject to the conditions listed in the Schedule.                  

## RevocationsE+W+S

3.  The Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) (No. 2) Order 2013(3) and the Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 2013(4) are revoked.                  

Dan Rogerson

Parliamentary Under Secretary of State

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

5th March 2014

Article 2

## SCHEDULEE+W+SExempted Fireplaces

## EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Order)

This Order revokes and replaces with amendments the Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) (No. 2) Order 2013                     (S.I. 2013/2112) and the Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/3026).                  

It exempts the fireplaces listed in the Schedule from the provisions of section 20 of the Clean Air Act 1993 (prohibition                     of smoke emissions in smoke control areas), subject to the conditions set out in the Schedule. Several additional fireplaces                     have been exempted.                  

A full impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no impact on the private, voluntary or public sector                     is foreseen.                  

1

1993 c. 11.                           

2

Fuels declared by the Secretary of State to be authorised fuels for the purposes of Part 3 of the Clean Air Act 1993 under                              section 20(6) of that Act are specified in S.I. 2014/491.                           

3

S.I. 2013/2112, amended by S.I. 2013/3026.                           

4

S.I. 2013/3026.
# CE2004078EN.01073801.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/738 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/738

---

(2004/C 78 E/0786)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2428/03

by Niels Busk (ELDR) to the Council

(22 July 2003)

Subject:   State aid to Italian milk producers

Subject:

Will the Council explain how its decision to approve Italian State aid to Italian milk producers is consistent with the provisions of Article 12 of the Treaty concerning equal treatment of European citizens and, therefore, including milk producers?

---
# C_2023338EN.01003201.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/32

---

Action brought on 7 August 2023 — ePlus v EUIPO — Telefónica Germany (E-Plus)

(Case T-462/23)

(2023/C 338/42)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: ePlus Inc. (Herndon, Virginia, United States) (represented by: A. Mottet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark E-Plus — European Union trade mark No 17 698 846

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2023 in Case R 1463/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, including those incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, including those incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO;

| — | order any intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order any intervener to bear its own costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Insufficient assessment of genuine use and implications for bad faith assessment; |
| --- | --- |

—

Insufficient assessment of genuine use and implications for bad faith assessment;

| — | Misinterpretation of evidence pertaining to cessation of use; |
| --- | --- |

—

Misinterpretation of evidence pertaining to cessation of use;

| — | Disregard for proprietor’s discontinuation of use and implication for bad faith assessment. |
| --- | --- |

—

Disregard for proprietor’s discontinuation of use and implication for bad faith assessment.

---
ESTATE OF CURRAN v. N.C. DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROL & PUBLIC SAFETY.

No. COA08-305.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 20, 2009.

Certification Date February 9, 2009.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (TA-18182).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0203

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DION CURTIS GRAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including June 18, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

May 8 2024

05/08/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0203
STATE v. Tony Levatte SMITH.

No. 237P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2015.

Tony Levatte Smith, for Smith, Tony Levatte.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of July 2015 by Defendant to Proceed in Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2015."
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS GARCIA,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

RON E. BARNES, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 13-16479

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-01760-EMC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 13, 2014** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner Carlos Garcia appeals from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review the district court’s decision to

deny Garcia’s habeas petition de novo, see Nevarez v. Barnes, 749 F.3d 1124, 1127

FILED

AUG 18 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(9th Cir. 2014) (per curiam), and we affirm.

In January 2010, while Garcia was still incarcerated, California Penal Code

section 2933.6 was amended to deny conduct credits for inmates who are housed in

a security housing unit and are validated gang members or associates. Garcia

contends that his right to be free from ex post facto laws was violated because his

release date was extended when prison officials applied amended section 2933.6 to

him. The state court’s rejection of this claim was not contrary to, or an

unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court precedent. See 28

U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); Nevarez, 749 F.3d at 1128-29 (California court did not

unreasonably conclude that section 2933.6 punishes conduct occurring after the

original offense). Moreover, on this record, the state court did not make an

unreasonable determination of fact when rejecting this claim. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(d)(2).

AFFIRMED.

2 13-16479
Exhibit 10.33






EXHIBIT 10.33




UGI CORPORATION

SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




The table below shows the components of director compensation effective October 1, 2010. A
director who is an officer or employee of the Registrant or its subsidiaries is not compensated for
service on the Board of Directors or on any Committee of the Board.



DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CASH	 	 	EQUITY
	 	 	COMPONENT	 	 	COMPONENT (1)
	 
	 
	Annual retainer
	 	$	62,000	 	 	2,550 Stock Units
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	8,500 Options for the purchase of shares of common stock of the Registrant.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Additional Annual Retainer for
Audit Committee Members
(other than the Chairperson)
	 	$	5,000	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Additional Annual Retainer for
Audit Committee Chairperson
	 	$	10,000	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Additional Annual Retainer for
Compensation and Management
Development Committee Chairperson
	 	$	10,000	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Additional Annual Retainer for
Corporate Governance Committee
Chairperson
	 	$	5,000	 	 	 








	 	 	 
	(1)	 	Stock Units and Options are granted under the UGI Corporation 2004 Omnibus
Equity Compensation Plan Amended and Restated as of December 5, 2006
In the Matter of the FORECLOSURE OF the DEEDS OF TRUST EXECUTED BY Grover C. BROWN and wife, Margaret C. Brown Dated April 1, 1980, Recorded in Book 949 at Page 109, and Book 949 at Page 111, Buncombe County Registry.

No. 224PA15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Wilder Wadford, Weaverville, for Brown, Grover C., et al.

Adam W. Bull, Asheville, for Almond, Nelson T. (Executor), et al.

John R. Dillard, for First Choice Title, LLC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd of July 2015 by Petitioners (Grover & Margaret Brown) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."