alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Berkley E. HAIRSTON v. Butch JACKSON, Superintendent-Nash Correctional; Theodis Beck, Secretary of N.C. Dept. of Corrections; State of North Carolina.

No. 199P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Berkley E. Hairston, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 23rd day of April 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,746
<SECURITIES>                                    83,525
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,933
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,881
<PP&E>                                          28,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,503
<SALES>                                         11,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,005
<CGS>                                            1,017
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   437
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,711)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,282)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,429)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,429)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GameTech International, Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cornelius T. Klerk, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Cornelius T. KlerkCornelius T. KlerkChief Financial OfficerFebruary 14, 2005
# Fourth Court o f Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 1, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00589

- CR

Anthony George NELSON, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR2179 Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Pre siding



### O R D E R

The court reporter has filed a second notification of late record stating that she is unable to file the reporter’s record because (1) appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee

, and (2) her other duties preclude her from working on the record. The court reporter states that she anticipates that she will complete the record by November 27, 2016.

The clerk’ s record shows the trial court appointed counsel to represent appellant in this

appe al. Thus, the trial court has made a finding that appellant is indigent. Appellant is therefore entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee.

We GRANT the court reporter a second extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s rec ord is due on November 28, 2016

. No further extensions will be granted

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal o f the said

court on this 1st day of November, 2016

.___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Neil Christiansen, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Freedom Resources Enterprises, Inc. (the Company), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and



c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





September 15, 2005

/s/ Neil Christiansen

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. Christopher Lee KING.

No. 229P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 7, 2015.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, for King, Christopher Lee.

June S. Ferrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Gary W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion***308The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of July 2015 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of July 2015."
# CE2004078EN.01077401.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/774 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/774

---

(2004/C 78 E/0824)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3066/03

by Alain Esclopé (EDD) to the Commission

(14 October 2003)

Subject:   Breaking-up of decommissioned US warships

Subject:

The United States has decided to have hundreds of decommissioned US Navy warships, which are riddled with asbestos and contaminated with fuel oil, broken up in a port on the east coast of England. The towing of the ships to that port is exposing neighbouring national and international waters to serious environmental risks.

The logical course of action would have been for the ships to be broken up on US territory, rather than thousands of kilometres from their home port.

Pressure from US ecologists, combined with the financial incentives on offer, prompted the Americans to pass on the task of dealing with this ecological hazard to European countries which have already been badly affected by similar problems in recent years.

Against a background of world, and, more particularly, European, efforts to foster sustainable development, is it not strange that such practices should go unremarked?

It should be borne in mind that the Americans have adopted maritime legislation which authorises them to use military force to exclude vessels which pose an environmental risk from their territorial waters.

This story has demonstrated once again how easily safety issues are outweighed by financial considerations.

Does the Commission intend to take unilateral steps to remind the United States of its responsibilities, rather than simply allowing the countries concerned to act on their own account?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(10 November 2003)

(10 November 2003)

Following a complaint received on this matter, the Commission is currently investigating whether Community legislation has been complied with. The Commission has received information that suggests that the ships may leak oil, PCB and asbestos and that there may be some uncertainty that the recycling facility in the United Kingdom is ready to receive the ships and recycle them in an environmentally sound manner.

Further, the commitment made in Johannesburg to protect our vulnerable marine environment and the experience learned from the ‘Erika’, ‘Prestige’ and ‘Tricolor’ disasters should lead us to a precautionary approach.

The Commission has therefore expressed its concerns to the administrations of both the United Kingdom and the United States.

On 20 October 2003, the Member of the Commission responsible for the Environment made a declaration in the Parliament on this issue.

---
Helvetia Asset



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
December 3, 2014
N o. 04

- 14

- 00569

- CV
Burton KAHN , Appellant

v. HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERT, INC ., Appellee From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 18355 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding 

### ORDER On November 12, 2014, appellee filed a motion dismiss to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction . After reviewing appellee’s motion, we ordered appellant to file a written response to appellee’s motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction in this court on or before December 1, 2014

. We ordered appellant to file a written response specifically address ing whether the judgment or order from which app ellant seeks to appeal in this case, Appellate No. 04

- 14

- 00569

- CV, is the same judgment or order from which appellant sought to appeal in Appellate No. 04

- 14

- 00319

- CV, which was dismissed by this court upon appellant’s own motion on July 9, 2014. Appellan t filed a response. We now ORDER appellee to file a written reply to appellant’s r espo nse in this court on or before December 23, 2014

. We order the clerk of this court to serve cop ies of this order on appellant and all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
----

(2004/C 65 E/229)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2763/03

by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(16 September 2003)

Subject:   Invalidity of foreign teaching qualifications in France due to the unaltered practice of recruitment on the basis of a French examination

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(28 October 2003)

----

(1)OJ L 19, 24.1.1989.

(2)  Case C-419/92 Scholz ECR [1994] I-00505; Case C-15/96 Schöning ECR [1998] I-00047; Case C-187/96 Commission v. Greece [1998] I-01095; Case C-195/98 Österreichischer Gewerkschaftsbund ECR [2000] I-10497; Case C-224/01 Köbler, not yet published.

----
# CE2004084EN.01071901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/719 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/719

---

(2004/C 84 E/0807)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1040/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(28 March 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds from the Leader+ programme by the municipality of Perugia

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Perugia, urgently need to use European funds to support innovative rural development measures aimed at enhancing the cultural and natural heritage, creating new jobs by strengthening the local economy and improving the organisational capacity of rural communities,

can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Perugia has submitted projects for the Leader+ programme? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Perugia has submitted projects for the Leader+ programme?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Perugia has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Perugia has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---
SCWC

- 18

- 0000883

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

JOHN R. SILVA, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 18

- 0000883; CASE NO. 1PC161000733)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on Februar y 24, 2020, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, April 22 , 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-18-0000883 22-APR-2020 08:02 AM
RIBELIN v. CREEL.

No. 112A15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Robert L. Inge, Salisbury, for Creel, Phillip Ray.

Phillip Creel, for Creel, Phillip Ray.

Arlaine Rockey, Marshall, for Ribelin, Dana Marie (fka Creel).

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the amended motion filed on the 26th of March 2015 by Plaintiff-Appellant to Accept Corrected Certificate of Filing and Service:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
KIRBY, et al. v. NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 56PA14-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Matthew H. Bryant, for Kirby, Everette E., et al.

Dahr Joseph Tanoury, Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Department of Transportation.

John F. Oates, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for North Carolina Department of Transportation.

John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, for North Carolina Department of Transportation.

T. Paul Hendrick, Winston-Salem, for Kirby, Everette E., et al.

Kenneth C. Otis, III, Winston-Salem, for Kirby, Everette E., et al.

Kenneth A. Shanklin, Wilmington, for Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.

Matthew A. Nichols, for Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.

Elliot M. Engstrom, Raleigh, for Pacific Legal Foundation and Center for Law and Freedom.

W. Kirk Sanders, Winston-Salem, for Kirby, Everette E., et al.

John L. Wait, High Point, for N.C. Association of Realtors, Inc.

G. Wilson Martin, Jr., for N.C. Association of Realtors, Inc.

Jonathan D. Guze, Durham, for The John Locke Foundation.

Jessica Odom Wilkie, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Joshua D. Hansen, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Jones P. Byrd, Asheville, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.

Carlene M. McNulty, for N.C. Justice Center.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th of November 2015 by Mark Miller for Admission Pro Hac Vice:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LIN HOLDINGS
CORP. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET. AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH LIN HOLDINGS CORP. QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q DATED JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001062707
<NAME> LIN HOLDINGS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          29,375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,141
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,079
<PP&E>                                         127,458
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,803,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,063
<BONDS>                                        675,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     550,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,803,185
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,792
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   395
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,709)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,709)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2361Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/2361 of 16 December 2015 appointing an Italian member and an Italian alternate member of the Committee            of the Regions         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2361                     

# of 16 December 2015

# appointing an Italian member and an Italian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116(1), (EU) 2015/190(2) and (EU) 2015/994(3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January                              2020.

(2)A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Ignazio MARINO.

(3)An alternate member's seat would become vacant following the appointment of Mr Antonio DECARO as a member of the Committee                              of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which                     runs until 25 January 2020:                  

as member:
                -  Sig. Antonio DECARO, *Sindaco di Bari*;                                  

and

as alternate member:
                -  Sig. Andrea BALLARÈ, *Sindaco di Novara*,                                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Dieschbourg                            

1

OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.                           

2

OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.                           

3

OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.
# CE2004078EN.01071901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/719 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/719

---

(2004/C 78 E/0767)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1586/03

by Nuala Ahern (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(8 May 2003)

Subject:   Radioactive contamination from Sellafield

Subject:

Will the Commission set out the means by which it is in a position to independently determine, as required under Euratom Treaty Article 37, whether the reprocessing activities at Sellafield and La Hague respectively are liable or not to result in the radioactive contamination of the water, soil or airspace of another Member State?

---