alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Teon INGRAM.

No. 4P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2015.

Jess D. Mekeel, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Ingram, Robert Teon.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd of January 2015 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of June 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EDGAR CARDENAS

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 0 83

- C R

Appeal from the

346 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 8 0D0 1708 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third m otion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until May 2 7 , 201 9

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPELLANT ’ S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Gandara

, the Appellant ’ s attorney, prepare

the Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before May 2 7 , 2019

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 2 th day of April , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McCl ure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox , JJ.
#### In the Matter of Richard J. Hogan, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 553]

Order of disbarment entered. Memorandum: Respondent’s unexcused failure to appear or answer the petition constitutes a default *(see Matter of Wedlock,*230 AD2d 422; *see also Matter of Frank,*9 AD3d 916; *Matter of Cary,*7 AD3d 24; *Matter of Gaesser,*6 AD3d 1246). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
#### Winifred Duffy, Respondent, v Jeanette Duffy, Also Known as Jeanette R. Duffy, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 607]

*929In an action, inter alia, to partition real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated April 9, 2004, as, in effect, denied that branch of her motion which was to appoint a referee to ascertain and report the rights, shares, and interests of the parties in the subject premises.

Ordered that the order is reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for the entry of an interlocutory judgment providing for the sale of the subject premises.

The plaintiff is the widow and executrix of the estate of the decedent Ronald M. Duffy. The defendant is the decedent’s former wife, who resides in the former marital residence pursuant to a 1978 judgment of divorce that provided for her right to exclusive use and occupancy of those premises. Since there is no dispute that the parties are tenants-in-common, each owning a one-half undivided interest in the property, and that the property “is so circumstanced that a partition thereof cannot be made without great prejudice to the owners,” the plaintiff was entitled to the partition sale that she sought (RPAPL 915). The statute provides, however, that the sale must be authorized by an interlocutory judgment *(see*RPAPL 915), not an order. To the extent that the defendant may have-legitimate claims for amounts due from the estate, her remedy is to assert any such claims as a creditor against the plaintiffs share of the proceeds of the sale. Florio, J.P, S. Miller, Santucci and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         839,640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,490,808
<PP&E>                                      14,111,071
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,612,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,650,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,963,319
<BONDS>                                        850,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,676,336
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,650,328
<SALES>                                     14,092,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,092,914
<CGS>                                        4,409,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,673,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (5,951,850)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             469,357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,032,547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,034,947)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,034,947)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
Mark W. WARD v. JETT PROPERTIES, LLC.

No. 268P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Mark A. Ward, Pro Se.

Robert D. Hinshaw, Winston-Salem, for Jett Properties.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of June 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 939/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 939/2014 of 2 September 2014 establishing the certificates referred to in Articles            5 and 14 of Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on mutual recognition of protection            measures in civil matters         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 939/2014                     

# of 2 September 2014

# establishing the certificates referred to in Articles 5 and 14 of Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 of the European Parliament and                        of the Council on mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matters                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on mutual recognition                           of protection measures in civil matters(1), and in particular Article 19 thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)For proper application of Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 two certificates should be established.

(2)The United Kingdom and Ireland are bound by Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 and are as a consequence bound by this Regulation.

(3)Denmark is not bound by Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 nor by this Regulation.

(4)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Mutual Recognition of                              Protection Measures in Civil Matters established by Regulation (EU) No 606/2013,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

1.The form to be used for the application of a certificate referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 shall be                        as set out in Annex I as Form I.                  

2.The form to be used for the application of a certificate referred to in Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 shall be                        as set out in Annex II as Form II.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 January 2015.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.

Done at Brussels, 2 September 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

## ANNEX IU.K.

## ANNEX IIU.K.

1

OJ L 181, 29.6.2013, p. 4.
----

(2004/C 65 E/110)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1876/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(6 June 2003)

Subject:   Prospectus- denomination of issues

Will the Commission estimate the number of bond issues, and the total volume of issuance, in denominations of EUR 5 000 or less, EUR 1 000 or less, EUR 500 or less and EUR 100 or less?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2003)

The Commission has not sought to estimate the number of bond issues nor the total volume of issuance, in denominations of EUR 5 000 or less, EUR 1 000 or less, EUR 500 or less, and EUR 100 or less, because it does not believe this number will allow it to draw conclusions on the usefulness of a given threshold on individual denomination.

First, as background, it is important to note that the concept of high individual denominations for securities was introduced with the aim of making a clear separation between securities aimed at wholesale investors and those aimed at the retail market.

The Commission has knowledge of figures related to existing bonds' individual denominations (from the International Primary Market Association (IPMA) and also used by the European Banking Federation).

However, the Commission believes there is no added value in such figures for two main reasons:

----
Nonemployee Director's Compensation Schedule



 HEI Exhibit 10.3 
  

NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR’S COMPENSATION SCHEDULE 
 As of April 1, 2005 
  
 HEI

  

			
	 	  	paid quarterly


	 Annual Cash Retainer
	  	32,500
	 Chair, HEI Audit Committee
	  	15,000
	 Member, HEI Audit Committee
	  	5,000
	 Chair, HEI Compensation Committee
	  	5,000
	 Chair, HEI Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
	  	5,000
	 Lead Director
	  	10,000
		
	 HEI Common Stock annual grant
	  	1,400 shares
	 HEI Common Stock one-time grant for new directors
	  	2,000 shares

  
 ASB & HECO 
  

			
	 	  	paid quarterly


	 Annual Cash Retainer (for HEI & non-HEI directors, for each board served)
	  	20,000
	 Chair, Audit Committee
	  	10,000
	 Member, Audit Committee
	  	4,000
		
	 HEI Common Stock annual grant
	  	1,000 shares
	 HEI Common Stock one-time grant for new directors
	  	600 shares

  
 HELCO & MECO Advisory Boards

  

	
	 $1,000 for each meeting, no retainer
TYLER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. BARFIELD.

No. COA06-1344.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Richmond (04CVS312).

Case reported without published opinion Affirmed.
Donald E. POWERS, Jr., Employee v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER, CO., d/b/a Kelly Springfield Tire Co., Employer and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Carrier.

No. 331P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Kathleen Sumner, Greensboro, for Donald E. Powers Jr.

J.A. Gardner, III, Charlotte, for Goodyear & Liberty.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th day of July 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Towers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date  March 28, 2005                        By:      /s/Robert Sandburg
                                                     ------------------
                                            Name:    Robert Sandburg
                                            Title:   Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Alliance Towers, Inc.
and will be retained by Alliance Towers, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In the Matter of WILL OF John JONES.

No. 37A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 13, 2008.

Jason L. Hendren, Travis K. Morton, Raleigh, for Joseph McLeod.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of March 2008 by Caveator for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Caveator (Jean Jones) shall have up to and including the 7th day of April 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in *896conference this the 13th day of March 2008."
LVNV FUNDING, LLC v. AIKENS.

No. COA08-750.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 17, 2009.

Certification Date March 9, 2009.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (07CVD13571).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
STATE v. JACKSON.

No. COA08-455.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (06CRS88878).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Linwood Earl FORTE.

No. 20A04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Margaret Lumsden, Raleigh, Mark E. Hayes, Greensboro, for Forte.

Valerie Spalding, Raleigh, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th day of December 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wayne County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a meeting of the Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG). The TAMWG affords stakeholders the opportunity to give policy, management, and technical input concerning Trinity River restoration efforts to the Trinity Management Council. Primary objectives of the meeting will include: Introduce new members; historical overview; program orientation; how to make TAMWG more effective; TAMWG organization, operations, and effectiveness; and election of officers. The agenda items are approximate and are dependent on the amount of time each item takes. The meeting could end early if the agenda has been completed. The meeting is open to the public. 

# DATES:

The Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group will meet from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesday, March 1, 2005. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Veteran's Memorial Hall, 101 Memorial Lane, Weaverville, CA 96001. Telephone: (530) 623-3975. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mike Long of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, 1655 Heindon Road, Arcata, California 95521, (707) 822-7201. Mike Long is the committee's Designated Federal Official. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

For background information and questions regarding the Trinity River Restoration Program, please contact Douglas Schleusner, Executive Director, Trinity River Restoration Program, P.O. Box 1300, 1313 South Main Street, Weaverville, California 96093, (530) 623-1800. 

Dated: January 20, 2005. 

Paul Hanson, 

Acting Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office , Sacramento, CA. 

[FR Doc. 05-1792 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
BOILEAU v. SEAGRAVE.

No. COA07-1431.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CVS7400).

Case reported without published opinion. NO ERROR as to the judgment entered upon the jury verdict, and the trial court's order denying Plaintiff's Rule 59 motion is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   We have issued our report dated February 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of GameTech International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of GameTech International, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-167749 effective June 24, 2010, 333-122836 effective February 15, 2005, 333-72886 effective November 7, 2001, and 333-51411 effective April 30, 1998).
   /s/ PIERCY BOWLER TAYLOR & KERN
  Certified Public Accountants
 Las Vegas, Nevada
 February 15, 2011
STATE v. Sebastian X. MOORE.

No. 409P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of June 2008 by Defendant Charging the N.C. Supreme Court to Review Applicable Law Concerning Choice of Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."
**Compensation
      Amendment**








It
      is
      further understood and agreed that the undersigned herein; Mr. Nick Cirillo,
      whom has been retained to serve as the Chief Executive Officer shall be entitled
      to an annual equity assignment in connection with his services to, and on behalf
      of the Company. It is further understood that Mr. Cirillo will be compensated
      on
      a per annum basis pursuant to the attached schedule articulated herein referred
      to as “Schedule A”.





Such
      compensation shall be issued on the anniversary date of the employment agreement
      as adopted by the company and shall continue as long as Mr. Cirillo is employed
      with the Company. Further, such compensation shall be reviewed and revised
      in a
      manner consistent with the employment agreement to mitigate any increases in
      responsibility as inured.





“Schedule
      A”





Stock
            
            Warrants
                (*)1,500,000
                Common Shares
            
            3,000,000
                Common Warrants





Notes:
      All such warrants, as issued and assigned, shall be subject to a bonafide Board
      Resolution affording the assignee the right to convert same on a cashless basis
      pursuant to such assignment having been issued in accordance with the governing
      employment agreement. Further, it is understood and accepted that such assignee
      must be in the full time employment of the Company pursuant to the terms and
      conditions as set forth.








Agreed:
            
            Agreed:Clickable
                Oil
            
            Mr.
                Nick CirilloDated:
            
            Dated:
Exhibit 99.1

Annual Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Modern Times Group MTG AB (publ) (the "Company") does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|Dated: June 30, 2003 |  | /s/HANS-HOLGER ALBRECHT
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | Name:                  
|                     |  | Title:                 
|Dated: June 30, 2003 |  | /s/MIA BRUNELL         
|                     |  | Name:                  
|                     |  | Title:                 

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Modern Times Group MTG AB (publ) and will be retained by Modern Times Group
MTG AB (publ) and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks