alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Karl Brenza, Chief Financial Officer of enherent Corp., certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of enherent Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Karl Brenza Karl Brenza  Chief Financial Officer  March30, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           APR-3-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-3-1998
<CASH>                                           5,838
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,630
<INVENTORY>                                     65,420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,983
<PP&E>                                          31,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,125
<BONDS>                                          1,924
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,249
<SALES>                                         99,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,533
<CGS>                                           78,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    802
<INCOME-TAX>                                       196
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       606
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.3

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Quarterly Report") of Edison Mission Energy (the "Company"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, based on his knowledge, that:

| | /s/THOMAS R. MCDANIELThomas R. McDaniel
Chief Executive Officer
Edison Mission Energy
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/KEVIN M. SMITHKevin M. Smith
Chief Financial Officer
Edison Mission Energy        

This statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7601

CLEOFAS LEWIS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD LOCKLEAR,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-95-821-5-BR)

Submitted: November 28, 1995 Decided: April 19, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleofas Lewis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Lewis v. Locklear, No. CA-95-821-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# CE2004070EN.01011401.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/114 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/114

---

(2004/C 70 E/115)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2587/03

by Marco Pannella (NI) to the Council

(8 August 2003)

Subject:   Execution of Faramaz Mohammadi, the 19-year-old leader of the student movement at Tabriz University (Iran)

Subject:

On 22 July Xalq Qazeti, an Azerbaijan newspaper, published a report according to which:

| — | some days earlier the Tabriz Revolutionary Court had sentenced a leader of the student movement, Faramaz Mohammadi, to death; |
| --- | --- |

—

some days earlier the Tabriz Revolutionary Court had sentenced a leader of the student movement, Faramaz Mohammadi, to death;

| — | Faramaz Mohammadi, a nineteen-year-old Azerbaijani citizen, was a student at Tabriz University and a key figure in the student movement; |
| --- | --- |

—

Faramaz Mohammadi, a nineteen-year-old Azerbaijani citizen, was a student at Tabriz University and a key figure in the student movement;

| — | after the execution her body was taken to Ardabil; |
| --- | --- |

—

after the execution her body was taken to Ardabil;

| — | she was one of the organisers of the student movement at Tabriz University and had delivered radical speeches against Iran's Persian and mullah regime; |
| --- | --- |

—

she was one of the organisers of the student movement at Tabriz University and had delivered radical speeches against Iran's Persian and mullah regime;

| — | although the court had passed the death sentence a month before, she had been executed two days earlier. |
| --- | --- |

—

although the court had passed the death sentence a month before, she had been executed two days earlier.

Is the Council aware of the events described and, if so, what action has it taken or does it intend to take? Does it not consider that all relations with Iran should be suspended and any resumption thereof be made subject to respect for fundamental human rights and a moratorium on capital punishment?

Reply

(5 December 2003)

(5 December 2003)

The Council is not aware of the events described and never comments on information contained in press releases. The Council normally bases its decisions to act in individual cases on corroborated reports. To the Council's knowledge, this particular information has not been corroborated.

---
# CE2004088EN.01043501.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/435 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/435

---

(2004/C 88 E/0440)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2723/03

by Francisca Sauquillo Pérez del Arco (PSE) to the Commission

(3 September 2003)

Subject:   European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights and indigenous peoples

Subject:

According to the Commission, one of the priorities under the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) must be the fight against racism, xenophobia and discrimination towards ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples. The Council has also, on several occasions, confirmed its promise of support for indigenous peoples (see Conclusions of the Council of June 2001 and November 2002). There are, however, reports that indigenous peoples receive no mention in the EIDHR budget for 2004.

Can the Commission confirm that, in accordance with the guidelines of the Council, the Commission itself and the European Parliament, the EIDHR programming document, which is currently being drawn up, will take indigenous peoples into consideration, according them a particular mention and a specific budget item?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(26 September 2003)

(26 September 2003)

Following up on the commitments of the Union regarding support for the rights of indigenous peoples, the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) contributes to achieve these objectives by opening up access to funding for projects of organisations representing indigenous peoples or working with them. The EIDHR Programming Document 2002-2004 identified the empowerment of indigenous peoples to promote their rights and the enhancement of respect for the rights of indigenous peoples at the international level for specific support. For the period from 2002 to 2004, the programming document included an indicative allocation of EUR 15 million in support of corresponding projects. On the basis of this multi-annual programming and within the framework of the identified objectives, the EIDHR programming update for 2004 continues to provide opportunities for project funding in support of the rights of indigenous peoples at global, regional and focus country level.

---
STATE v. Exavi Yoalmo PORTILLO.

No. 172P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Catherine F. Jordon, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of April 2008 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
Twan BEY (Antwan L. Burns) v. HARNETT COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, Jacquelyn L. Lee.

No. 201P15-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

Mr. Twan (Antwan L. Burns) Bey, for Bey, Twan (Antwan L. Burns).

*AMENDED ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 12th of October 2015 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Harnett County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
STATE of North Carolina v. Alfonza Dwanta COLTRANE.

No. 348A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Anne Bleyman, for Coltrane.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 645 S.E.2d 793.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 21st day of July 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Defendant's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
WALLY, et al. v. CITY OF KANNOPOLIS.

No. 58P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

T.C. Morphis, Jr., Hickory, Attorney at Law, for Wally, Fred, et al.

Rebecca K. Cheney, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for City of Kannapolis.

Keith J. Merritt, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for City of Kannapolis.

Melanie J. Raubach, Charlotte, Attorney at Law, for City of Kannapolis.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th of July 2015 by Plaintiffs to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."

ERVIN, J., recused.
NEUSOFT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, USA, Inc., et al. v. NEUISYS, LLC, et al.

No. 288P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Nov. 5, 2015.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of August 2015 by North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2015."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
BALANCE SHEET OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INCOME FUND XI, L.P. AS OF DECEMBER 31,
1998, AND THE AUDITED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         500,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,640,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (87,818)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,053,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,911
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,903,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,053,409
<SALES>                                        377,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               377,483
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               123,195
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                87,818
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,006
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                157,464
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            157,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   157,464
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    46.18<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    46.18<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Net Income (Loss) per Partnership Unit.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.11**

**CONSENT OF CHRISTINE BEAUSOLEIL, P.GEO.**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F, and any amendments and exhibits thereto, ofGoldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 (collectively, the “Annual Report”), I, Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., consent to (i) the use of and reference to the technical report dated31 December, 2015, entitled “Éléonore Operations, Quebec, Canada, NI 43-101 Technical Report” (the “Technical Report”), or portions thereof, that was prepared by me,that I supervised the preparation of and/or was reviewed and approved by me, (ii) the use of and references to my name, including as an expert or “qualified person”, in connection with the Annual Report and the Technical Report, and(iii) the information derived or summarized from the Technical Report that is included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report and any of the exhibits thereto. 

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such information contained in the Annual Report and exhibits thereto intoRegistration Statement Nos. 333-126039,333-126040,333-151243,333-151251,333-174376,333-181116,333-188805,333-195816 and333-213153 on Form S-8,No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 of the Company. 

Date: March16, 2017
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Towers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date: April 14, 2004                    By: /s/ Michael Delin
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Name: Michael Delin
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Alliance Towers, Inc.
and will be retained by Alliance Towers, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
VI 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 68 

For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai 

Chaowasaree). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Vichai Sae Tung (also known as Chai 

7 Chaowasaree) shall be held and considered to have been 

8 lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent resi9 dence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon 

10 payment of the required visa fees. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 68 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Vichai 

3 Sae Tung (also known as Chai Chaowasaree), as provided 

4 in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 

5 officer to reduce by the appropriate number during the 

6 current fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas 

7 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

8 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)). 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Captaris, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, David P. Anastasi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    DAVID P. ANASTASI             
|David P. Anastasi                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 5, 2006
Exhibit 99.6

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-126039, 333-126040, 333-151243, 333-151251,
333-174376, 333-181116, 333-188805, 333-195816 and
333-213153 on Form S-8, No. 333-207371 on Form F-3 and No. 333-211892 on Form F-10 and to the use of our reports dated February 15, 2017 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Goldcorp Inc. and subsidiaries
and the effectiveness of Goldcorp Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2016.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte LLP                                    
|                                                    
|Chartered Professional Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
|                                                    
|March 16, 2017