alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered August 27, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01222-CR

ANGEL ESPINO PALOMO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-63321-H

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s August 25, 2014 pro se motion for appointment of new 

counsel.

The Court GRANTS appellant an extension of time to file his pro se response to the 

Anders brief filed by counsel. The pro se response is due by OCTOBER 6, 2014. If the pro se 

response is not filed by that date, the appeal will be submitted on the Anders brief alone.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Angel Espino 

Palomo, TDCJ No. 1892894, Ferguson Unit, 12120 Savage Dr., Midway, Texas 75852.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
# CE2004070EN.01008602.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/86

---

(2004/C 70 E/089)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2337/03

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 July 2003)

Subject:   Alcoholic consumption in European cities

Subject:

A number of constituents have raised concerns over how the English are portrayed in Europe. Their concerns arise mainly from experiences of young people using cheap flights to go abroad for stag and hen weekends.

Does the Commission collect data on the increase in violent incidents in ‘tourist areas’ of European capital cities arising from or connected with alcohol consumption? If so please could the Commission provide this information?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(6 October 2003)

(6 October 2003)

The Commission does not at present collect data on the number of violent incidents in ‘tourist areas’ of European capital cities arising from or connected with alcohol consumption.

Nevertheless, the Commission considers that it would be useful if the competent authorities of the Member States, which are responsible for maintaining public order on their territory, were to collect information for statistical purposes so that the extent of the problem could be correctly assessed and adequate measures taken.

Such information could be relevant for the report which the Commission is drafting on the economic and social burden of alcohol, which is one of the priorities of the public health program for the Community for 2003-2008.

Crime prevention including the prevention of alcohol-related criminality, remains a matter largely within the responsibility of local, regional and national authorities. Action at Union level in this field should continue to be limited to supporting exchange of information and best practice between the competent authorities, such as the European Crime-Prevention Network, which focuses on urban, juvenile and drug-related crime.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
VISION CORPORATION'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                  9,457
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           5,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                              246
<INVENTORY>                                             7,831
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       25,592
<PP&E>                                                  5,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                          3,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         46,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   6,137
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                   80
<OTHER-SE>                                             32,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           46,280
<SALES>                                                37,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       37,966
<CGS>                                                  23,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          23,769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        4,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           17
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           488
<INCOME-TAX>                                              267
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       221
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              221
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.03
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statement Nos.    333-139551,333-37207,333-54440    and    333-64135 on    Form S-8    of our report dated February 19, 2008, relating to the    consolidated financial statements and financial statement    schedules of CNA Surety Corporation and subsidiaries (which    report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an    explanatory paragraph relating to the changes in the method of    accounting for defined benefit postretirement plans and for    stock-based compensation in 2006), and of our report dated    February 19, 2008 on the effectiveness of internal control    over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of CNA Surety Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended    December 31, 2007.     /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP     Chicago, Illinois    February 19, 2008
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 819/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 819/2014 of 24 July 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for ling in Union and international            waters of I and II by vessels flying the flag of France         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 819/2014                     

# of 24 July 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for ling in Union and international waters of I and II by vessels flying the flag of                        France                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GST
FUNDING'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                17,192,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,192,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             253,923,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,852,000
<BONDS>                                    265,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,929,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               253,923,000
<SALES>                                     33,821,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,821,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          36,091,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,270,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,270,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,270,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. BUZZ OFF INSECT SHIELD, L.L.C., a North Carolina limited liability company, International Garment Technologies, L.L.C., a North Carolina limited liability company, Erie Insurance Exchange, Erie Insurance Company.

No. 272A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins. Co.

Mack Sperling, John S. Buford, Greensboro, Cecilia O. Miller, Diana S. Casey, San Diego, CA, for International Garment Tech.

Gary K. Sue, Greensboro, for Erie Insurance.

Michael A. Hamilton, for Erie Insurance.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 664 S.E.2d 317.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiff on the 10th day of June 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."

*28Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Accordingly, the new brief of the Plaintiff shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
Candy STREZINSKI, Employee v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, Employer and Key Risk Management Services, Carrier.

No. 23P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Kathleen G. Sumner, Greensboro, for Candy Strezinski.

Caroline Lock, Greensboro, for City of Greensboro, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 654 S.E.2d 263.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of January 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
# Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2336Show full title

Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2336 of 14 December 2015 amending Decision 2010/279/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission            in Afghanistan (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2336                     

# of 14 December 2015

# amending Decision 2010/279/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)On 18 May 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/279/CFSP(1) on the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN).

(2)On 17 December 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/922/CFSP(2) amending and extending Decision 2010/279/CFSP, in particular by extending EUPOL AFGHANISTAN until 31 December 2016 and providing                              for a financial reference amount for the period until 31 December 2015.

(3)Decision 2010/279/CFSP should be amended to provide for a financial reference amount for the period from 1 January 2016 to                              31 December 2016,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

In Article 13(1) of Decision 2010/279/CFSP, the following sub-paragraph is added:

‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUPOL AFGHANISTAN for the period from 1 January 2016                        to 31 December 2016 shall be EUR 43 650 000.’                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 14 December 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

F. Mogherini                            

1

Council Decision 2010/279/CFSP of 18 May 2010 on the European Union Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN) (OJ L 123, 19.5.2010, p. 4).                           

2

Council Decision 2014/922/CFSP of 17 December 2014 amending and extending Decision 2010/279/CFSP on the European Union Police                              Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL AFGHANISTAN) (OJ L 363, 18.12.2014, p. 152).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,428
<SECURITIES>                                    23,493
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                       434
<INVENTORY>                                      1,350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,253
<PP&E>                                           3,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,543
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,691
<OTHER-SE>                                         431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,665
<SALES>                                         16,963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,963
<CGS>                                            3,191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (554)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    900
<INCOME-TAX>                                       591
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                309
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       309
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
# Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/117Show full title

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/117 of 26 January 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive            measures against Syria         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/117                     

# of 26 January 2015

# implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria(1), and in particular Article 30(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 31 May 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

(2)By its judgments of 13 November 2014 in Cases T-653/11, T-654/11 and T-43/12, the General Court of the European Union annulled                              the Council's decision to include Aiman Jaber, Khaled Kaddour, Mohammed Hamcho and Hamcho International on the list of persons                              and entities subject to the restrictive measures set out in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

(3)Aiman Jaber, Khaled Kaddour, Mohammed Hamcho and Hamcho International should be included again on the list of persons and                              entities subject to restrictive measures, on the basis of new statements of reasons.

(4)Decision 2013/255/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP shall be amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 26 January 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

E. Rinkēvičs                            

## ANNEXU.K.

The following persons and entity shall be inserted in the list of persons and entities set out in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

### I.**LIST OF NATURAL AND LEGAL PERSONS, ENTITIES OR BODIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLES 27 AND 28**U.K.

#### A.PERSONSU.K.

#### B.ENTITIESU.K.

1

OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.
Fourth Department,

September, 2005

(September 30, 2005)

#### Anthony P. Hoerner et al., Respondents, v Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C., et al., Appellants, and Mary P. Rossi, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[801 NYS2d 223]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered March 24, 2004. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendants Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C., Douglas J. Jank and Jay B. Jank for an order granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens,*155 AD2d 435 [1989]; *see also*CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Hayes, JJ.
IN RE J.M.E.

No. COA08-821.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Harnett (05J39).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# CE2004065EN.01000801.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/8

---

(2004/C 65 E/008)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3416/02

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(2 December 2002)

Subject:   Religious freedom

Subject:

Act 1990/IV entitled ‘Religious Institutions and Freedom of Conscience and Religion’ is a cornerstone in the 1989 regime change in Hungary. Based upon the Declaration of Human and Civil Rights, and the separation of Church and State as guaranteed by the Hungarian constitution, law 1990/IV emphasises the equality of all Hungarians, regardless of their world-views. It sets forth equal rights and equal obligations for all religious organisations and directs that the disbursement of government funds to religious institutions must be objective.

Last year, the previous Hungarian Government introduced law 2001/LXXIV (PA 153). The law proposed a new way to disburse funds to religious organisations — one that replaced the annual voluntary declaration by taxpayers, with ambiguous statistics derived from a recent and controversial census.

This law is allegedly unconstitutional, it discriminates against 98 % of religious organisations and it contravenes the spirit of Act 1990/IV.

| 1. | Does the Commission believe Act 1990/IV reflects the EU's concern for human rights and religious freedom? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the Commission believe Act 1990/IV reflects the EU's concern for human rights and religious freedom?

| 2. | Does the Commission consider law 2001/LXXIV (PA 153) to be in conformity with the EU's concern for human rights and religious freedom? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the Commission consider law 2001/LXXIV (PA 153) to be in conformity with the EU's concern for human rights and religious freedom?

| 3. | Would the Commission urge the Hungarian Government to repeal law 2001/LXXIV (PA 153) before it takes effect on 1 January 2003? Would the Commission encourage the Hungarian Government to remain faithful to the ideals of Act 1990/IV, which could serve as model legislation for other Member States? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Would the Commission urge the Hungarian Government to repeal law 2001/LXXIV (PA 153) before it takes effect on 1 January 2003? Would the Commission encourage the Hungarian Government to remain faithful to the ideals of Act 1990/IV, which could serve as model legislation for other Member States?

---