alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 476 

To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to provide for 11 

circuit judges on the United States Court of Appeals for the District 

of Columbia Circuit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2007 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to 

provide for 11 circuit judges on the United States Court 

of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JUDGES ON THE UNITED STATES COURT OF AP4 PEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIR5 CUIT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The table under section 44(a) of 

7 title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the 


bajohnson on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 476 IS

1 item relating to the District of Columbia and inserting the 

2 following: 

‘‘District of Columbia ............................................................................... 11’’. 

3 (b) EXISTING VACANCY NOT FILLED.—In order to 

4 comply with the amendment made under subsection (a), 

5 1 of the vacancies of circuit judges on the United States 

6 Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 

7 which existed on the date preceding the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, shall not be filled. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 175 (Monday, September 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53811-53812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1420-BJ-TRST] ES-053722, Group No. 170, Minnesota


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plat survey; Minnesota.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota

T. 143 N., R. 37 W.

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of portions 
of the south, east, west and north boundaries, a portion of the 
subdivisional lines; and the dependent resurvey and survey of the 
subdivision of sections 1, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 16, 23, 24, 25, 27, 30, 
32, 34 and 36, Township 143 North, Range 37 West, of the Fifth 
Principal Meridian, in the State of Minnesota., and was accepted 
September 1, 2005. We will place a copy of the plat we described in 
the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of 
information.

    If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the 
plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.

[[Page 53812]]

    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: September 1, 2005.
Stephen D. Douglas,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 05-17975 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
STATE v. Chris Darryl DRYE.

No. 2P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 8, 2009.

LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of January 2009 by Defendant to Proceed in Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of January 2009."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000930832
<NAME>                                         JETFLEET III
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,405,670
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    218,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              14,646,730
<PP&E>                                        13,196,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,093,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                14,646,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,361,820
<BONDS>                                       11,076,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,661,450
<COMMON>                                         815,200
<OTHER-SE>                                      (268,090)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  14,646,730
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,191,410
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 587,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               456,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  147,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                      49,560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               98,260
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      98,260
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.12



</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60150

T. L. CASHAW, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

TRACY VANCE and JOHN PAGE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

(2:92-CV-46)

April 10, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, REYNALDO G. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiffs appeal an adverse partialsummary judgment and judgment on an adverse

jury verdict in their action against the City of Charleston, its Police Chief, and police

officers Tracy Vance and John Page. Having considered the briefs and oral arguments

of counsel and pertinent parts ofthe record, and finding no reversible error, the judgments

appealed are AFFIRMED.
IN RE B.C.S.

No. COA08-573.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 18, 2008.

Certification Date December 8, 2008.

Appeal from Davidson (05JB189).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Sunny D. LOVETTE and Jim Lovette v. Lisa S. YORK, Executrix of the Estate of Gypsy H. Stallings.

No. 312P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Jay Vannoy, North Wilkesboro, for Lovette.

John Willardson, Wilkesboro, for York.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of July 2007 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN TV Corp. for the three monthsended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Gary R. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andVincent L. Sadusky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: November 9, 2005 By:  /s/ Gary R. Chapman    Gary R. Chapman    Chief Executive Officer                 Dated: November 9, 2005 By:  /s/ Vincent L. Sadusky    Vincent L. Sadusky    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
csgs-ex1025v_180.htm



Exhibit 10.25V

 

TWENTY-THIRD AMENDMENT

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CSG MASTER SUBSCRIBER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CSG SYSTEMS, INC.

AND

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC

 

 

This Twenty-third Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made by and between CSG Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CSG”), and Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Customer”).  CSG and Customer entered into that certain Amended and Restated CSG Master Subscriber Management System Agreement dated February 9, 2009, as amended (the “Agreement”), and now desire to further amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.  If the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment shall be in conflict with the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control.  Any terms in initial capital letters or all capital letters used as a defined term but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.  Upon execution of this Amendment by the parties, any subsequent reference to the Agreement between the parties shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.  Except as amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect according to their terms. 

 

CSG and Customer agree to the following upon the Effective Date:

 

1.   That subsection titled "Monthly Cost Review" of the section titled "Review and Proposals" of  Exhibit H.1-The Services to the Agreement cited below, will be deleted in its entirety as will any and all other references in the Agreement to "Monthly Cost Review," and neither party hereto shall have any further rights or obligations relating thereto:

 

"Reviews and Proposals

Monthly Cost Review.  CSG will provide a monthly spreadsheet to Customer detailing the major cost areas represented on CSG's prior month invoice.  Customer will provide the major cost areas to be reviewed, example areas include: Monthly Fees, Product license fees, bill creation fees, bill inserting fees, postage fees, WAN fees, and consulting services fees."

 

 

THIS AMENDMENT is executed on the day and year last signed below (the “Effective Date”).

 


		
	
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING

COMPANY, LLC (“CUSTOMER”)

 

By: Charter Communications, Inc., its Manager
	
CSG SYSTEMS, INC. (“CSG”)

	
 

 

By: /s/ Steve Blechschmidt
	
 

 

By:  /s/ Peter E. Kalan

	
 

Title:  Mgr Billing Vendor Rel.
	
 

Title:  President, CEO

	
 

Name:  Steve Blechschmidt
	
 

Name:  Peter E. Kalan

	
 

Date:  2/1/12
	
 

Date:  2/2/12
----

(2004/C 33 E/078)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0799/03

by Paulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(11 March 2003)

Subject:   The situation of the Kurdish leader Abdulah Ocalan

Can the Commission confirm that Abdulah Ocalan has been in solitary confinement in Turkey since the present Turkish Government took office?

What steps is the Commission taking to prevent the political situation from deteriorating as far as the rights of the Kurdish minority are concerned?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(1 April 2003)

The Commission is aware of Abdullah Öçalan's current detention conditions. The Commission took note that, after a period of around three months of isolation, A. Öçalan received the visit of his brother Mehmet and of a number of his lawyers on 12 March 2003.

The Commission is monitoring closely Turkey's compliance with the Accession Partnership priorities, including the provisions aimed at ensuring cultural diversity and guaranteeing cultural rights for all citizens irrespective of their origin.

The Commission will give a detailed assessment of Turkey's compliance with the Copenhagen political criteria in its forthcoming 2003 Regular Report on Turkey.

----
# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/71 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/71 of 3 December 2014 adopting an eighth update of the list of sites of Community            importance for the Alpine biogeographical region (notified under document C(2014) 9082) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/71                     

# of 3 December 2014

# adopting an eighth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region

# *(notified under document C(2014) 9082)* (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2370 of 26 November 2015 adopting a ninth update of the list of sites of Community                                 importance for the Alpine biogeographical region (notified under document C(2015) 8206).
STATE v. McGRADY.

No. COA07-1258.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Cherokee (04CRS51710).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. STEWART

No. COA06-731.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Alamance (03CRS59477, 03CRS59478, 03CRS59479, 04CRS491).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 617 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 617

    To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
              available at a discount to certain veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2007

   Mr. Smith introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
              available at a discount to certain veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Eagle Parks Pass Act''.

SEC. 2. VETERANS NATIONAL PARKS AND FEDERAL RECREATIONAL LANDS PASS.

    Section 805(b) of division J of the Consolidated Appropriations 
Act, 2005 (16 U.S.C. 6804(b)), is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(3) Veterans discount.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall make the 
                National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
                available, at a cost of $10, to any veteran who was 
                separated from military service under conditions other 
                than dishonorable, if the veteran provides proof of the 
                status by presenting a DD214.
                    ``(B) Term.--A National Parks and Federal 
                Recreational Lands Pass issued under this paragraph 
                shall be valid for 1 year after the date of issuance of 
                the pass.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GameTech International, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the 52 weeks ended November 1, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marcia
R. Martin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ MARCIA R.
MARTIN


Marcia R.
Martin


Chief
Financial Officer


January
29, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54083-54084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18006]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION AND PRIVACY COMPACT COUNCIL


Fingerprint Submission Requirements

AGENCY: National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Council.

ACTION: Notice of approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 14616.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 28 CFR part 901, the National Crime Prevention and 
Privacy Compact Council (Compact Council), established by the National 
Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Act of 1998 (Compact), has 
approved a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) proposal to 
access the Interstate Identification Index (III) System on a delayed 
fingerprint submission basis when conducting pre-employment criminal 
history record checks on FEMA emergency workers during times of natural 
disasters and catastrophic emergencies. (See FEMA's request, attached) 
FEMA is authorized access to criminal history record information to 
conduct background checks on applicants for federal employment pursuant 
to title 28 United States Code section 534 and Executive Order 10450.
    The FEMA's request was submitted by letter dated October 19, 2004, 
and approved by the Compact Council on November 4, 2004, pursuant to 28 
CFR 901.2 and 901.3. Access to the III System to conduct name-based 
criminal history record checks, followed by fingerprint submissions, 
provides a responsive and timely avenue to support FEMA's need for 
expeditious pre-employment screening during exigent circumstances. An 
example of such need arose during 2004 when several hurricanes struck 
the southeastern portion of the United States causing the FEMA to hire 
large numbers of emergency workers in a short period of time. FEMA 
intends to enlist the services of the Federal Protective Service or 
another criminal justice agency with authorized direct access to the 
III System to conduct the preliminary III name checks on behalf of 
FEMA. Such name-based checks will be followed by submission of the 
applicant's fingerprints to the FBI within 5 working days.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd C. Commodore, FBI CJIS Division, 
1000 Custer Hollow Road, Module C3, Clarksburg, WV 26306; Telephone 
(304) 625-2803; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfcbdcd0d2d2d0dbd0ffd3dad091d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bffe8e4e6e6e4efe4cbe7eee4a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>; Fax number (304) 625-5388.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See attached proposal.

    Dated: August 24, 2005.
Donna M. Uzzell,
Compact Council Chairman.
BILLING CODE 4410-02-P

[[Page 54084]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13SE05.023

[FR Doc. 05-18006 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-C


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE v. GOLDSTON.

No. COA08-340.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Durham (04CRS50797).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
# CE2004078EN.01034302.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/343 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/343

---

(2004/C 78 E/0362)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3711/01

by Jonas Sjöstedt (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(16 January 2002)

Subject:   New trade agreement with the USA

Subject:

In spring 1998, plans for a new trade agreement between the European Union and the USA were put on ice, partly owing to protests by France.

Is the Commission currently taking soundings with a view to drawing up a new trade agreement, or have the negotiations on a new trade agreement stopped completely?

Answer given by Mr Lamy on behalf of the Commission

(5 March 2002)

(5 March 2002)

It is assumed that the Honourable Member's written question refers to a possible Free Trade Agreement between the Community and the United States. In such a case, it should be noted that while this is an idea that periodically comes up, no mandate for such negotiations with the United States has ever been sought, nor (of course) have any such negotiations taken place. The Commission, moreover, has no plans to seek any mandate. However, it should be noted that in 1998, the Community and the United States launched the Transatlantic Economic Partnership to give a further impetus to the Community-United States trade and investment relationship. Since then bilateral co-operation has increased to currently cover virtually all trade and investment areas and thereby reinforce the largest bilateral trading relationship world-wide.

Both administrations have made some important progress, such as on the guidelines for regulatory co-operation. The Community and the United States have virtually completed a Mutual Recognition Agreement on marine equipment. However, such progress has often lacked political visibility. Some thought should be given as to what more can be done: how the Union and the United States can constructively address their differences and develop their co-operation, as long as it is compatible with the Doha Development Agenda negotiations, and both side's other trade partnerships, notably with developing countries.

---
WALLACE v. FT. MYERS PARTNERSHIP, et al.

No. 257P08-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Coward Law Firm, Washington, DC, for Ft. Myers Partnership, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of July 2008 by Plaintiff to Supplement Petition to Vacate:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."