alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Charles Everette HINTON.

No. 449P11-12.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Charles E. Hinton, Cary, for Hinton, Charles Everette.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd of April 2015 by Defendant for Notice and Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 918/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 918/2013 of 20 September 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for haddock in EU and international            waters of Vb and VIa by vessels flying the flag of Spain         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 918/2013                     

# of 20 September 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for haddock in EU and international waters of Vb and VIa by vessels flying the flag                        of Spain                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 39/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available to EU vessels for                              certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are not subject to international negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 1.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18165]



[[Page 54392]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2004N-0554]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Irradiation in the Production, 
Processing, and Handling of Food

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Irradiation in the Production, 
Processing, and Handling of Food'' has been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of March 29, 2005 
(70 FR 15863), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0549. 
The approval expires on June 30, 2008. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: September 7, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-18165 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the "Quarterly Report") of
Edison Mission Energy (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best
of his knowledge and belief, that:

| | /s/THEODORE F. CRAVER, JR.Theodore F. Craver, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
Edison Mission Energy
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/W. JAMES SCILACCIW. James Scilacci
Chief Financial Officer
Edison Mission Energy            

This
statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Edison Mission Energy and will be retained by Edison Mission Energy and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54353-54354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

[[Page 54354]]

    Title: Application to Shuck Surf Clams/Ocean Quahogs at Sea.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0240.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 51.
    Number of Respondents: 202.
    Average Hours Per Response: 5 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: Federally permitted fishing vessels participating 
in the Atlantic surf clam or ocean quahog individual transferable quota 
(ITQ) fishery in the Northeast Region of the U.S. are subject to 
certain information collection requirements. The National Marine 
Fisheries Service uses the collected information to process requests 
for the transfer of surf clam or ocean quahog quota shares or 
authorization to shuck surf clams or ocean quahogs at sea.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations; 
individuals or households.
    Frequency: As requested by public.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#02664a7b6c676942666d612c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="53371b2a3d363813373c307d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e7a5f48575a616c514d4a555b4c7e51535c105b514e10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9fdbfee9f6fbc0cdf0ecebf4faeddff0f2fdb1faf0efb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 8, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-18188 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ADAMS CREEK ASSO. v. DAVIS, et al.

No. 3P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Anita S. Earls, for Davis & Reels.

Claud R. Wheatly, III, Beaufort, for Adams Creek Asso.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 652 S.E.2d 677.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of January 2008 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion for Stay dissolved by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
Tommy AKINS and wife, Stacy Mae Akins v. MISSION ST. JOSEPH'S HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.

No. 497P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Grover McCain, Jr., Chapel Hill, for Akins.

Mark C. Kurdys, Asheville, for Health System.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 667 S.E.2d 255.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of November 2008 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
# C_2023314EN.01002201.xml

| 4.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/22

---

Action brought on 13 July 2023 — Kärntner Sparkasse v SRB

(Case T-404/23)

(2023/C 314/26)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Kärntner Sparkasse AG (Klagenfurt, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, A. Brenneis and J. Holzmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2023/23) together with annexes, at least in so far as it concerns the applicant, and

| — | order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.

The applicant further claims that, on account of the connection between and same subject matter of the following cases, they should be joined for the purposes of the written or oral part of the procedure and decision, pursuant to Article 68 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court: T-400/23, Erste Group Bank v SRB, T-401/23, Erste Bank der österreichischen Sparkassen v SRB, T-402/23, Steiermärkische Bank und Sparkasse v SRB, T-403/23, Dornbirner Sparkasse Bank v SRB, T-404/23, Kärntner Sparkasse v SRB, T-405/23, Sparkasse Niederösterreich Mitte West v SRB, T-406/23, Tiroler Sparkasse v SRB, T-407/23, Salzburger Sparkasse Bank v SRB, T-408/23, Sparkasse Oberösterreich Bank v SRB.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are identical to those relied on in Case T-402/23, Steiermärkische Bank und Sparkasse v SRB.

---
Eleanor PEGG v. Ervin JONES, et al.

No. 9A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 30, 2008.

James E. Tanner, III, John T. Stewart, Chapel Hill, for Ervin Jones.

Sydenham B. Alexander, Jr., Chapel Hill, Meg K. Howes, for Eleanor Pegg.

The following order has been entered on the consent motion filed on the 28th day of April 2008 by Defendant (Ervin Jones) to Amend Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of April 2008."

HUDSON, J., recused.
STATE v. Dominique Jevon PERRY.

No. 81A14-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 12, 2014.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, For Perry, Dominique Jevon.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General.

J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney.

**Opinion**

The following Order was entered: Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31(a) and (b)(2) and Rule 15(e)(2) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court on its own initiative hereby certifies for review prior to determination in the Court of *Appeals State v. Dominique Jevon Perry,* COA13-1117. The case shall be docketed in this Court as of the date this order. Briefs of the respective parties that have been submitted to the Court of Appeals shall be considered by this Court.
In re Lady KITCHIN by and for Hodge Kitchin and Jean Kitchin, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. HALIFAX COUNTY, et al.

No. 468P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

John W. Bryant, Raleigh, for Kitchin.

Robert T. Numbers, II, James R. Morgan, Jr., Winston-Salem, William McBlief, Halifax County Attorney, Roanoke Rapids, for Halifax County et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 665 S.E.2d 760.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 17th day of October 2008 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
# CE2004065EN.01005901.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/59

---

(2004/C 65 E/060)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1034/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(28 March 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds from the Leader+ programme by the municipality of Ancona

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Ancona, urgently need to use European funds to support innovative rural development measures aimed at enhancing the cultural and natural heritage, creating new jobs by strengthening the local economy and improving the organisational capacity of rural communities,

can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Ancona has submitted projects for the Leader+ programme? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Ancona has submitted projects for the Leader+ programme?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Ancona has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Ancona has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---
# C_2023286EN.01001801.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Katowice — Zachód w Katowicach (Poland) lodged on 28 April 2023 — Skarb Państwa — Dyrektor Okręgowego Urzędu Miar w K. v Z. sp.j.

(Case C-279/23, Skarb Państwa)

(2023/C 286/21)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy Katowice — Zachód w Katowicach

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skarb Państwa — Dyrektor Okręgowego Urzędu Miar w K.

Defendant: Z. sp.j.

Question referred

Does Article 6(1) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions (1) preclude national legislation under which a national court may dismiss an action for compensation for the recovery costs referred to in that provision on the ground that the debtor’s delay in payment was not significant or on the ground that the amount which the debtor was late in paying was small?

---

(1)  OJ 2011 L 48, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of R&B Falcon Corporation as restated to reflect the
recontinuance  of  the  oil  and gas operations for the three years ended
December 31,  1998  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                           <C>              <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR             YEAR            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998      DEC-31-1997      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998      JAN-01-1997      JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1998      DEC-31-1997      DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                           177              101              144
<SECURITIES>                       0                0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                    271              197              147
<ALLOWANCES>                      12                7                3
<INVENTORY>                       36               15               13
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 527              321              307
<PP&E>                         3,550            2,009            1,427
<DEPRECIATION>                   519              426              355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 3,709            1,933            1,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            352              336              111
<BONDS>                        1,697                0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0                0                0
<PREFERRED>                        0                0                0
<COMMON>                           2                2                2
<OTHER-SE>                     1,248              726              715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   3,709            1,933            1,456
<SALES>                            0                0                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               1,033              933              610
<CGS>                              0                0                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    817              773              431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0                0                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0                0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                64               42               41
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  161              124              140
<INCOME-TAX>                      59               85               27
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               91               30              106
<DISCONTINUED>                    36              (36)               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  (24)               0                0
<CHANGES>                          0                0                0
<NET-INCOME>                     103               (6)             103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    .61             (.04)             .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                    .61             (.04)             .67
        

</TABLE>
IN RE A.N.J.-H.

No. COA08-740.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 2, 2008.

Certification Date December 22, 2008.

Appeal from Gaston (07JT353, 07JT354).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC v. GRAY, et al.

No. 108PA14-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 21, 2015.

Debbie W. Harden, Charlotte, for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.

Meredith J. McKee, Charlotte, for Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.

Jackson R. Price, Charlotte.

John R. Buric, Charlotte, for Gray, Herbert A.

Preston O. Odom, III, Charlotte, for Gray, Herbert A.

Fred W. DeVore, III, Charlotte, for Builder Support Services Of The Carolinas, Inc., et al.

Derek P. Adler, Charlotte.

Erik M. Rosenwood, Charlotte, for Yarbrough-Williams & Houle, Inc.

Mark R. Kutny, Charlotte.

Lawrence J. Goldman, Charlotte, for Lucas-Forman, Inc.

Gregory W. Brown, Raleigh, for Carter Land Surveyors & Planners, Inc.

Kristi L. Gavalier, Raleigh.

Matthew D. Rhoad, Raleigh, for Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., et al.

Davis F. Roach, Raleigh, for Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., et al.

Joseph W. Eason, Raleigh, for N.C. Electric Membership Corporation, et al.

Martin Warf, for N.C. Electric Membership Corporation, et al.

Kimberly S. Hibbard, General Counsel, for N.C. League of Municipalities.

Gregory F. Schwitzgebel, III, Associate General Counsel, for N.C. League of Municipalities.

Daniel F. McLawhorn, Associate City Attorney, for N.C. League of Municipalities.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th of July 2015 by NC League of Municipalities for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of July 2015."

Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within *314the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).
STATE of North Carolina v. Richard Glenn HALLYBURTON.

No. 446P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Richard G. Hallyburton, Pro Se.

Daniel S. Johnson, Special Deputy Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 661 S.E.2d 326.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of September 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."