alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 33 E/074)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0770/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(6 March 2003)

Subject:   Suspected infringement procedures and recording of infringements notified to the Italian Republic pursuant to Article 8 5 of the EC Treaty

With reference to Article 8 5 of the EC Treaty:

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(8 April 2003)

The Commission took one formal decision within the meaning of Article 85 (2) of the EC Treaty in 1987 with regard to Alitalia.

For the rest, the Commission does not have sufficient details of the matter to be able to investigate the problem raised and is not, therefore, in a position to answer the question at the moment. It would ask the Honourable Member to specify its question. Article 85 of the EC Treaty does not provide for any notification to Member States.

----
William L. DAVIS, Guardian ad Litem for John Brooks Davis v. Daniel I. SUGARMAN, M.D.; The Sanger Clinic; Lake Norman Regional Medical Center; Mooresville Hospital Management Associates, Inc.; Richard Scherczinger; Alan Micklin, M.D.; and Charlotte Cardiology Associates, P.A.

No. 471P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

A.L. Butler Daniel, Erin K. Pleasant, Wrightsville Beach, for Davis.

Harvey L. Cosper, Jr., Leigh K. Hickman, Charlotte, for Sugarman & Sanger Clinic.

James W. Williams, Mark C. Kurdys, Asheville, for Sherczinger and Cardiology Assoc.

Mark E. Anderson, Andrew H. Nelson, Raleigh, Monica E. Webb, for Lake Norman & Mooresville.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 24th day of October 2008 by Defendants (Scherczinger & Charlotte Cardiology Assoc.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*748"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
1999 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-14-1999

Carter v. City of Philadelphia

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 98-1581

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Carter v. City of Philadelphia" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 126.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/126
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 No. 98-1581 

 Re: Carter v. City of Philadelphia, et al. 

 The following modifications have been made to the Court's Opinion 

issued on 

 April 28, 1999 in the above-entitled appeal and will appear as part of 

the final version of 

the opinion: 

 Page 2, after "Susan F. Burt, Esquire" delete "Berlinger & 

Small" 

 

 Page 6, line 6, after "Office" insert "pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 12(b)(6)" 

 Page 12, third line of the first full paragraph, after 

"reasons" insert "-- 

 explaining how it balanced the competing concerns that inform 

our 

 interpretation of Rule 54(b) --" 

 Page 13, in the third paragraph, line 4, change the 

year from "1985" to 

 "1995" 

 Page 25, line 7 of the first full paragraph, delete 

"prosecution" and insert 

 "litigation" 

 Page 26, n. 53, line 3 "States'" should be "states'" 

and again at the end. 

 Page 28, last line on page, delete "11 S. Ct. at 1938 

n.2" 

 Page 29, next to last line of first paragraph after 

"1983" the comma should 

 be deleted and a hyphen inserted. 

 Page 31, n.61, add the following sentence at the end: 

"To the extent that 

 Carter's claims are predicated on inadequate training, 

supervision or 

 discipline of police officers (as opposed to assistant district 

attorneys), 

 Carter will be required to establish sufficient de juen or de 

facto control by 

 the defendants to supporting a finding of causation. 
98-1581 

Carter v. City of Philadelphia, et al. 

 

 Very truly yours, 

 /s/P. Douglas Sisk, Clerk
# C_2023286EN.01003201.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/32

---

Action brought on 9 June 2023 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission

(Case T-327/23)

(2023/C 286/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Biogen Netherlands BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek and B. Jong, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission, the Defendant, of 15 February 2023 (C(2023)1211 (final)) granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (1) for ‘Dimethyl Fumarate Accord — dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use; and, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission, the Defendant, of 15 February 2023 (C(2023)1211 (final)) granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (1) for ‘Dimethyl Fumarate Accord — dimethyl fumarate’, a medicinal product for human use; and,

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging incorrect interpretation of the concept of the global marketing authorisation as laid down in Article 6(1), second subparagraph, of the Directive (2) and application of this concept to the medicinal products Tecfidera and Fumaderm leading to the incorrect conclusion in the Contested Decision that, at the relevant time, regulatory data protection for Tecfidera had already expired.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (OJ 2004, L 136, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001, L 311, p. 67).

---
# The Heavy Fuel Oil (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

Statutory Instruments

# 2014 No. 162

Health And Safety

Town And Country Planning, England

# The Heavy Fuel Oil (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

28th January 2014

Laid before Parliament

30th January 2014

Coming into force

20th February 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.6.2015) by The Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 2015 (S.I. 2015/483), regs. 1(1), **31** (with reg. 3(2))
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PL
BRANDS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                          1,391
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,391
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           68,975
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        9,143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      2,128,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    (67,584)
<SALES>                         9,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                9,211
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                105,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (96,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (96,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (96,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                   .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .000



</TABLE>
IN RE L.H.

No. COA08-882.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 2, 2008.

Certification Date December 22, 2008.

Appeal from Buncombe (93J27, 07JA323, 07JA324).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                         RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Scott H. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Reckson Associates Realty
Corp. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1)       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                  and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:  December 16, 2002


                                 By /s/ Scott H. Rechler
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Scott H. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer
# CE2004084EN.01047501.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/475 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/475

---

(2004/C 84 E/0549)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1697/03

by Mihail Papayannakis (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(22 May 2003)

Subject:   Consumer fraud involving cat and dog skins

Subject:

A BBC programme claims that hundreds of consumers in Europe are victims of fraud because they are unwittingly buying furs manufactured in Europe from cat and dog skins.

The same programme reports that hundreds of thousands of cats and dogs worldwide are killed each year by shady operators seeking to make a profit by selling their skins in Europe, without any clear indication of the origin of their ‘products’.

In view of the fact that consumer protection is one of the fundamental policies of the EU, will the Commission say what practical measures it will take to put an end to this travesty of a trade which is not only an abhorrent practice but also constitutes consumer fraud?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(10 July 2003)

(10 July 2003)

At present, the Commission has no information that confirms that cats and dogs are farmed for their fur in the Union or in the ten Acceding Countries.

The Commission does not ignore the issue of imports of cat and dog furs. The Commission is currently examining the questions raised taking into consideration the respective requirements of World Trade Organisation (WTO) law, legal bases under Community law and the interplay with existing legislation to prevent consumer deception.

---
IN RE C.S.J.

No. COA08-631.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 4, 2008.

Certification Date November 24, 2008.

Appeal from Nash (06JA124, 06JA125, 06JA126, 06JA127).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Jacinda BURTON, Administratrix of the Estate of Michael C. Burton v. PHOENIX FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC. and DAVIS, MARTIN, POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Donna Davis, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles M. Davis v. Phoenix Fabricators and Erectors, Inc. and Davis, Martin, Powell & Associates, Inc.

No. 447P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Richard E. Jester, Louisburg, for Mother.

Matthew Middleton, for Buncombe Co. DSS.

Christy E. Welhelm, for Father.

Jerry W. Miller, Attorney Advocate, Asheville, for Guardian ad Litem.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 648 S.E.2d 235.

*ORDER*

Finding that the order of the trial court denying defendant's motion to dismiss affects a substantial right and will work injury if not *243corrected before final judgment, we allow defendant's Petition for Discretionary, Review for the sole purpose of remanding the matter to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the merits. Defendant's Alternative Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 10th day of April, 2008,
STATE of North Carolina v. Ricky Kyle CORBETT.

No. 337A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 12, 2008.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 661 S.E.2d 759 (2008), dismissing defendant's appeal from a judgment entered 2 April 2007 by Judge James C. Spencer, Jr. in Superior Court, Alamance County. Heard in the Supreme Court 19 November 2008.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Kathryne E. Hathcock, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

C. Scott Holmes, Durham, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
# Political and Security Committee Decision EUCAP Sahel Niger/3/2014Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision EUCAP Sahel Niger/3/2014 of 24 July 2014 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission            of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (2014/643/CFSP)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision EUCAP Sahel Niger/3/2014                     

# of 24 July 2014

# extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger)

# (2014/643/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to the Council Decision 2012/392/CFSP of 16 July 2012 on the European Union CSDP mission in Niger, (EUCAP Sahel                           Niger)(1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Decision 2012/392/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance                              with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic                              direction of the EUCAP Sahel Niger mission, including, in particular, the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

(2)On 6 May 2014, the PSC adopted Decision EUCAP Sahel Niger/2/2014(2), appointing Mr Filip DE CEUNINCK as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Niger from 6 May 2014 to 15 July 2014.

(3)On 22 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/482/CFSP(3), extending the mandate of EUCAP Sahel Niger from 16 July 2014 to 15 July 2016.

(4)The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed to extend the mandate of Mr Filip                              DE CEUNINCK as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Niger from 16 July 2014 to 15 July 2015,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The mandate of Mr Filip DE CEUNINCK as Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) is                     hereby extended until 15 July 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply from 16 July 2014.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2014.

*For the Political and Security Committee*                            

*The Chairperson*                            

W. Stevens                            

1

OJ L 187, 17.7.2012, p. 48.                           

2

Political and Security Committee Decision EUCAP Sahel Niger/2/2014 of 6 May 2014 on the appointment of the Head of Mission                              of the European Union CSDP Mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (OJ L 136, 09.5.2014, p. 26).                           

3

Council Decision 2014/482/CFSP of 22 July 2014 amending Decision 2012/392/CFSP on the European Union CSDP mission in Niger                              (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 31).
# CE2004088EN.01060401.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/604 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/604

---

(2004/C 88 E/0621)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0984/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Perugia

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Perugia, urgently need to use European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions, nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and culture,

can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Perugia has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Perugia has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Perugia has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Perugia has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---
# C_2023261EN.01004502.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/45

---

Action brought on 12 June 2023 — The Not Company v EUIPO (NOT MILK)

(Case T-320/23)

(2023/C 261/62)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: The Not Company SpA (Santiago, Chile) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, J. Rodríguez-Fuensalida y Carnicero, P. Ramells Higueras, A. Figuerola Moure and P. Muñoz Moreno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark NOT MILK — Application for registration No 18 508 169

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 March 2023 in Case R 2233/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | confirm that the contested decision misapplies Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

confirm that the contested decision misapplies Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the continuation of the processing of the contested mark in Classes 29 and 32 and its subsequent registration. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the continuation of the processing of the contested mark in Classes 29 and 32 and its subsequent registration.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the principles of equal treatment and good administration. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principles of equal treatment and good administration.

---
APPLICANT: SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON APPLICATION NO. WR-77.138-29 

### APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ACTION TAKEN REMAND FOREVIDENTIARY HEARING. JUDGE 

# ¥////sDATE
Exhibit 24.2
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



                  KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE  PRESENTS  that the  undersigned,  whose
signature appears below, constitutes and appoints Adolph J. Ferro and Gilbert N.
Miller,  or either of them as his true and  lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent,
with full  power of  substitution  and  resubstitution  for him and in his name,
place and  stead,  in any and all  capacities,  to sign Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended  September  30, 1999,  and any  amendments  thereto,  pursuant to the
requirements  the Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and to file
the same with the United  States  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  and the
Nasdaq Stock Market.

                  DATED  8th  day of November 1999.
                        -----


                                    /s/ Nancy L. Buc
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    Nancy L. Buc