alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,577
<SECURITIES>                                    27,031
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,106
<PP&E>                                          21,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,426)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,627
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        86,894
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,544)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,030
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,172
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,911)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,911)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


Exhibit 10.6(a)
 
 
 
Schedule of Employment Continuation Agreements of Named Executive Officers dated September 30, 2010.
 
		
	 
Name
	 
Termination Benefit

	 
Laurence M. Downes, President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
Three times the sum, of (x) his then annual base salary and (y) the average of his annual bonuses paid or payable with respect to the last three calendar years ended prior to the Change of Control.

	 
Mariellen Dugan, Senior Vice President and General Counsel
	 
Two times the sum, of (x) her then annual base salary and (y) the average of her annual bonuses paid or payable with respect to the last three calendar years ended prior to the Change of Control (“2x”).

	 
Kathleen T. Ellis, Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs
	2x

	 
Glenn C. Lockwood, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	2x

	 
Stephen D. Westhoven, Senior Vice President, NJR Energy Services Company
	2x
# CE2004088EN.01009701.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/97 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/97

---

(2004/C 88 E/0102)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2558/03

by Robert Evans (PSE) to the Commission

(4 August 2003)

Subject:   Human rights in Peru

Subject:

Is the Commission aware of the arrest and detention of Walter Cubas Baltazar in Peru? Concerned constituents have contacted me in response to reports of alleged torture of Mr Walter Cubas Baltazar during the course of his detention.

Can the Commission assure my constituents that it monitors reports of human rights abuses in Peru and uses the opportunities arising from its official relations with the country in order to highlight instances of concern?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(12 September 2003)

(12 September 2003)

The Commission is aware of the arrest and detention of Walter Cubas Balthazar in Peru and the Commission Delegation in Lima is closely following events relating to the arrest.

In line with the Working Paper on the implementation of the Guidelines to Union policy towards third countries on torture of December 2002, EU Heads of Mission in Lima have recently reported on the situation with respect to torture in the country and are monitoring Peru's progress towards the complete eradication of torture.

Human Rights issues occupy a permanent place on the agenda of the Union-Peru political dialogue, carried out at the level of the Andean Community (CAN). The Union is supporting in particular the work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación Nacional) amongst whose tasks is the investigation of serious human rights violations during the period of 1980-2000.

---
Erin ISENBERG v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY.

No. 192P15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Adam J. Hopler, Durham, Attorney at Law, for Isenberg, Erin.

Sharon A. Johnston, Raleigh, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security.

Adam James Hopler, Chief Counsel, for North Carolina Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security.

Jason J. Kaus, General Counsel, for North Carolina Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of June 2015 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Open Commission Meeting; Thursday, 
September 15, 2005

September 8, 2005.
    The Federal Communications Commission will hold an Open Meeting on 
Thursday, September 15, 2005, which is scheduled to commence at 9:30 
a.m. in Room TW-C305, at 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The 
meeting will focus on presentations regarding the effects of Hurricane 
Katrina on communications services in the Gulf Coast states.
    Open captioning will be provided for this event. Other reasonable 
accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. 
Include a description of the accommodation you will need including as 
much detail as you can. Also include a way we can contact you if we 
need more information. Make your request as early as possible; please 
allow at least 5 days advance notice. Last minute requests will be 
accepted, but may be impossible to fill. Send an e-mail to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#43252020767377032520206d242c35"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99fffafaaca9add9fffafab7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a> or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 
(202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty).
    Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Audrey Spivack or David Fiske, Office of Media Relations, (202) 418-
0500; TTY 1-888-835-5322. Audio/Video coverage of the meeting will be 
broadcast live over the Internet from the FCC's Audio/Video Events Web 
page at http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio.
    For a fee this meeting can be viewed live over George Mason 
University's Capitol Connection. The Capitol Connection also will carry 
the meeting live via the Internet. To purchase these services call 
(703) 993-3100 or go to http://www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-18249 Filed 9-9-05; 1:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# CE2004088EN.01004502.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/45

---

(2004/C 88 E/0048)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1840/03

by Michael Cashman (PSE) to the Commission

(26 May 2003)

Subject:   Post-Iraq-War aid

Subject:

Given the recent record of human rights abuses in Egypt, can the Commission explain the rationale and decision-making process that led to the conclusion to send an accelerated package of eur 175 million in financial assistance to Egypt?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(18 June 2003)

(18 June 2003)

The EUR 175 million which the Commission intends to provide in the form of budgetary support to Egypt is an acceleration in disbursements within existing programmes funded from the MEDA budget.

This decision is designed as an emergency response to mitigate the negative economic effects of the Iraq war on the Egyptian economy. The immediate economic impact of the Iraq war on Egypt has been considerable, especially in lost tourist revenue and diverted direct foreign investment.

On the issue of Egypt's record on human rights, the Commission has not hesitated to raise issues of concern with the Egyptian authorities when it has been judged appropriate to do so. The Association Agreement, currently under ratification, will offer an additional and useful forum to discuss such issues.

---
----

(2004/C 65 E/225)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2756/03

by Marjo Matikainen-Kallström (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(15 September 2003)

Subject:   Forwarding of information about passengers flying between the EU and the USA

The EU has decided to provide such detailed information about passengers flying from the EU to the USA that it even includes credit card numbers.

Does the EU apply reciprocal requirements to those travelling from the United States to the European Union? If not, why does the EU not require the same information from the USA as the USA does from the EU? Will the EU introduce a requirement for information about passengers to be provided in the same detail as the USA requires?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(18 November 2003)

The Commission has not decided that information about passengers should flow to the United States. In fact, the US authorities have unilaterally imposed on airlines flying to, from and through the United States the obligation to provide access to Passenger Name Record (PNR) information, which is likely to contain personal details regarding the passengers, as well as information about the reservation and the flight.

The Commission considers that this requirement may conflict with EC data protection rules and is holding discussions with the relevant US authorities to find a solution that fully respects both US and EC law and makes the US authorities' legitimate objective of fighting terrorism — which the Union fully shares — compatible with the need to protect citizens' fundamental rights, including the protection of their personal data.

In the discussions with the US authorities the Commission has made clear that it considers certain aspects of the US request for access to passenger data in its current terms as disproportionate. This has also been highlighted by the Parliament and by some national data protection authorities in Member States.

Discussions are currently being held between the Commission and the Member States to determine what the appropriate and most extensive permissible use of PNR data in the fight against terrorism might be. The Commission has always insisted on respect for the principle of reciprocity in its discussions with the US authorities.

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

#### **CERTIFICATIONS OFPERIODIC REPORT**

 

I, John R. Serino, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Encision Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

·                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the three months ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Dated: November 14,  2008 |                        |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                           |                        |
|                           | /s/ John R. Serino          |
|                           |                        |
|                           | John R. Serino              |
|                           | Principal Executive Officer |

 

 

I, Marcia McHaffie, Controller and PrincipalAccounting Officer of Encision Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

·                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the three months ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Dated: November 14,  2008 |                                                                      |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |                                                                      |
|                           | /s/ Marcia McHaffie                                                       |
|                           |                                                                      |
|                           | Marcia McHaffie                                                           |
|                           | Controller, Principal  Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 2.9

                            [UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION]

                                  BANK HAPOALIM
                                  -------------
                               Central Management
                Electronics, Chemistry, Metal and Textile Sector
                                  "Zion House"
                              41-45 Rotschild Ave.
                                    Tel Aviv

March 2, 2004
To:  Tefron Ltd.

             Re: YOUR OBLIGATION TOWARDS US AS OF DECEMBER 14, 1999

In respect of your obligation mentioned above, which was corrected on May 16,
2000, February 18, 2001, November 12, 2001, July 30, 2002, August 5, 2003 and
November 5, 2003, we hereby notify you that we agree to the correction of the
above mentioned Obligations as set forth below:

Commencing with the financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and until the
financial statements as of March 31, 2004 (included), we hereby agree that your
financial ratios will be as follows:

     1. Shareholders' equity will not be less than 18% of your total assets.

     2. The aggregate shareholders' equity will not be less than U.S.
        $36,500,000 (thirty six million and five hundred thousand United States
        Dollars).

Except as provided above, the provisions of the Obligations referenced above
shall apply.

On the basis of this letter you will pay us a one time commission at the total
of $5,000 U.S Dollars, as agreed between us it will be collected through your
account based in our bank on the date this letter is issued.



Respectfully,

/s/ S. Eshkol
-------------

/s/ S. Shemer
-------------

Bank Hapoalim B.M.
Main Management
M. Alterman S. Eshkol
HODGSON CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. Ronald Wallace HOWARD and wife, Shirley Ann Howard.

No. 5P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

John Logsdon, North Wilkesboro, for Howard.

Daniel Johnson, North Wilkesboro, for Hodgson Construction.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 654 S.E.2d 7.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 7th day of January 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of January 2008 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
Vernetta Marie COCKERHAM-ELLEBEE, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Candice Cockerham v. The TOWN OF JONESVILLE, d/b/a The Jonesville Police Department, Scott Vestal and Lee Gwyn.

No. 266P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

William L. Hill, Torin L. Fury, Greensboro, for Town of Jonesville, et al.

Harvey L. Kennedy,. Harold L. Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for Cockerham-Ellerbee.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 660 S.E.2d 178.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of June 2008 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
STATE v. William Richard BRAY.

No. 563P97-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jerry Wilson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of December 2008 by Pro Se for Request to Reconsider Motions for Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of February 2009."
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-60449

Summary Calendar

ROBERT SUPINGER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

SIEMENS ENERGY AND AUTOMATION, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:94CV225LN)

January 16, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Supinger sued his employer, Siemens Energy , claiming he was

discharged because of his age in violatio n of the ADEA and that

subseq uently, after performing work for Siemens Energy as a

temporary consultant in the employment of Forse Temporary Agency,

he was terminated again for having filed an E EOC claim. Siemens2

Energy filed a motion for summary judgment and the district court

granted the motion.

We have carefully read the briefs and the record excerpts and

relevant portions of the summary judgment record, i ncluding the

deposition testimony of Supinger. For the reasons thoroughly and

carefully set forth by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion

and Order filed on June 23, 1995, we are satisfied th at the

district j udge correctly determined (1) that Supinger failed to

raise a genuine issue of material fact as to his age being a

determinative factor in his initial discharge and (2) that Supinger

failed to raise a genuine issue of fact as to r etaliation for

filing an EEOC claim being a reason for the termination of his

temporary consulting contract.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the final judgment in favor of Siemens

Energy filed on June 29, 1995.

AFFIRMED

.
# CE2004084EN.01072901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/729 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/729

---

(2004/C 84 E/0820)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2033/03

by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(18 June 2003)

Subject:   Re-opening of Greek secondary school at Rizokarpasso

Subject:

The Greek secondary school at Rizokarpasso has been closed since the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974. Since that time, children of families living in the enclave who finish their primary education in the area and wish to go on to secondary school are forced to move to the non-occupied areas of the island. The outcome of this situation is that families are moving from their homes and the Greek population of the area is dwindling.

| 1. | What steps will the Commission take to bring about the re-opening of the secondary school at Rizokarpasso given the fresh measures recently announced to bring Turkish Cypriots closer to the EU and the rapprochement between the Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities? |
| --- | --- |

1.

What steps will the Commission take to bring about the re-opening of the secondary school at Rizokarpasso given the fresh measures recently announced to bring Turkish Cypriots closer to the EU and the rapprochement between the Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities?

| 2. | How can the Commission contribute towards securing the rights to education of the children of the enclave, which the Turkish Cypriot side guaranteed when it signed the Vienna III Agreement? |
| --- | --- |

2.

How can the Commission contribute towards securing the rights to education of the children of the enclave, which the Turkish Cypriot side guaranteed when it signed the Vienna III Agreement?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-1983/03 and E-2033/03

given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(4 August 2003)

(4 August 2003)

In general, responsibilities in the field of education policies remain with the Member States. The competencies of the Community are limited.

Concerning the re-opening of the secondary school in Rizokarpaso, the Commission has taken note of the remarks of both of the Honourable Members.

Regarding the Commission's contribution towards securing the right to education of the children of Rizokarpaso, the Commission would like to refer to its Communication on promoting economic development of the northern part of Cyprus and bringing it closer to the Union (1). The Commission is proposing various measures bringing the northern part closer to the Union, ‘inter alia’, encouraging the participation in community programmes such as the Comenius programme for schools. The Commission is working on finding ways to implement these measures in consultation with the Government of Cyprus.

1

---

(1)  COM(2003) 325 final.

1

---