alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 552 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 595 

[Report No. 110–253] 

To amend the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 

1986 to strike a provision relating to modifications in reporting frequency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2007 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. SANDERS, 

and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Reported by Mrs. BOXER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Emergency Planning and Community Rightto-Know Act of 1986 to strike a provision relating to 

modifications in reporting frequency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Toxic Right-to-Know 

5 Protection Act’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 595 RS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS IN REPORTING FREQUENCY. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 313 of the Emergency 

3 Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (42 

4 U.S.C. 11023) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking subsection (i); and 

6 (2) by redesignating subsections (j) through (l) 

7 as subsections (i) through (k), respectively. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Sections 

9 322(h)(2) and 326(a)(1)(B)(iv) of the Emergency Plan10 ning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (42 

11 U.S.C. 11042(h)(2), 11046(a)(1)(B)(iv)) are amended by 

12 striking ‘‘313(j)’’ each place it appears and inserting 

13 ‘‘313(i)’’. 

14 SEC. 3. REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO TOXICS RELEASE IN15 VENTORY. 

16 Notwithstanding any other provision of law— 

17 (1) the Administrator of the Environmental 

18 Protection Agency (referred to in this section as the 

19 ‘‘Administrator’’) shall establish the eligibility 

20 threshold regarding the use of a form A certification 

21 statement under the Toxics Release Inventory Pro22 gram established under the Emergency Planning 

23 and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (42 

24 U.S.C. 11001 et seq.) at not greater than 500 

25 pounds for nonpersistent bioaccumulative and toxic 

26 chemicals; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 595 RS

1 (2) the use of a form A certification statement 

2 described in paragraph (1), or any equivalent suc3 cessor to the statement, shall be prohibited with re4 spect to any chemical identified by the Adminis5 trator as a chemical of special concern under section 

6 372.28 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (or 

7 a successor regulation). 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 552 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 595 

[Report No. 110

–253] 

A BILL 

To amend the Emergency Planning and Commuquency. sion relating to modifications in reporting fre- nity Right-to-Know Act of 1986 to strike a proviDECEMBER 19, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000931006
<NAME> ENSERCH EXPLORATION, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,458
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,213
<PP&E>                                       2,683,518
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,057,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,725,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,581
<BONDS>                                        130,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       940,599
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,725,768
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,083
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  214,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,430
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,430
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00278

- CR

Aurello E. Landeros

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 213th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1357498D )

September 22, 2016

O pinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COUR T OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
STATE of North Carolina v. Juan Carlos BENITEZ.

No. 24PA15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Sept. 24, 2015.

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Benitez, Juan Carlos.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, for State of North Carolina.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Vernon K. Stewart, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th of September 2015 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Lee County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th of September 2015."
----

(2004/C 65 E/264)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2936/03

by Ria Oomen-Ruijten (PPE-DE) and Alexander de Roo (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(6 October 2003)

Subject:   Electric connections for caravans

Further to the written question tabled in the light of some reports (cf. the 6 and 8 September 2003 editions of ‘Algemeen Dagblad’, a Dutch newspaper) that the electrical equipment of most caravans does not conform to European safety standards, attention must now also be paid to the electric connections between caravans and campsite electric bollards or junction boxes. Caravan connections in Europe must conform to the CEE 17 European Standard. Although the campsite connection must conform to the standards of the relevant Member State, the power point on that electric bollard must, in principle, also be equipped with the CEE connector. Any failure to monitor carefully the rules governing this matter may result in serious potential danger for caravanners.

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(11 November 2003)

For the time being the safety of electric installations of caravans is not covered by any Community

legislation. Electric connection of caravans to the mains on campsites is also excluded from Community

legislation. Electric installations and connections to the mains of caravans are subject to national installation rules in the Member States, which differ significantly.

----
# CE2004078EN.01018201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/182 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/182

---

(2004/C 78 E/0188)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2864/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(22 September 2003)

Subject:   Data and sources indicating the role currently played by the Vatican's financial system in the payment of interest to natural persons

Subject:

The answer to question E-2426/03 (1) given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission on 5 September 2003 states that the Commission can only say that the role currently played by the Vatican's financial system in the payment of interest to natural persons does not appear to be jeopardising the competitiveness of European financial markets.

1

Can the Commission say what data it has to support this claim and what their source was?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(16 October 2003)

(16 October 2003)

The Commission would refer to the reply to Written Question E-1914/02 put by the Honourable Member (2). The finding that a commercial financial sector does not currently exist on the territory of the Vatican City State (the only bank being the IOR (Istituto Opere di Religione), which also is the central bank) does indeed suggest that management of the assets of EU-resident natural persons is unlikely to be taking place on a scale comparable with that of the six non-EU countries to which the Council has given priority in starting discussions on taxation of savings (the United States, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Andorra, and San Maríno).

2

The priority given to a limited number of particularly significant financial centres was, moreover, inevitable given that the Council had opted to establish a link between the (early) adoption and implementation of the Community Directive and receipt of adequate assurances from the third countries concerned that they would introduce measures equivalent to those of the directive in their territory. Entering into immediate contacts with a larger number of financial centres would have been likely, under these conditions, to set back by several years not only the date of application of the Directive on taxation of savings, but also that of the other components of the tax package (the code of conduct on company taxation and the Directive on interest and royalties). The Commission hopes that the Honourable Member can agree that such a delay would be undesirable in the interests of the smooth operation of the internal market.

The Commission has undertaken to collect the available information on the matter raised by the Honourable Member and will inform him directly of the outcome.

---

(1)  OJ C 65 E, 13.3.2004.

1

(2)  OJ C 92 E, 17.4.2003.

2

---
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
JAMES ALSTON, Petitioner,

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent.

____________________

2010-3007

______________________
Petition for review of an arbitrat or’s decision in BW-2009-R-0004, by Barry E. Shapiro.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

J AMES W. R ICHARD , I I , AGE, Local 1923, of Baltimore, Maryland, argued for petitioner.

S COTT D. A USTIN , Senior Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for responde nt. With him on the brief were T ONY W EST , Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON , Director, and B RIAN M. S IMKIN , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was A PARNA V. S RINIVASAN , Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, of Baltimore, Maryland.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , M AYER , and P ROST , Circuit Judges ).AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

July 21, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Exhibit 99.2


                                 ARTHUR ANDERSEN


                 CONTIMORTGAGE CORPORATION

                 UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM
                 FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS

                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
                 TOGETHER WITH AUDITORS' REPORT
<PAGE>

                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


                         Independent Accountants' Report

To the Board of Directors of ContiMortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about ContiMortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP) and that ContiMortgage Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond
and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $14,000,000 and $6,000,000 as
of December 31, 1997, included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for ContiMortgage Corporation's compliance with those
minimum servicing standards and for maintaining a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the entity's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and
maintenance of a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about ContiMortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on ContiMortgage Corporation's compliance with
the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that ContiMortgage Corporation complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards and that ContiMortgage
Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
amount of $14,000,000 and $6,000,000 as of December 31, 1997, is fairly stated,
in all material respects.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


New York, New York
March 11, 1998
<PAGE>

ContiMortgage
One ContiPark
338 S. Warminster Road
Hatboro, PA. 19040-3430
(215) 347-3000


As of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, ContiMortgage Corporation has
complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers. As of December 31,1997 ContiMortgage Corporation had in effect
fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $14,000,000 and
$6,000,000, respectively.


/s/ Margaret M. Curry                   /s/ William P. Higgins
--------------------------------        ----------------------------------
Margaret M.Curry                        William P. Higgins
Sr. Vice President - Servicing          Vice President and Controller


March 11, 1998                                   March 11, 1998
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Leonard Armato, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of AVP, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of AVP, Inc.

      I, Andrew Reif, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of AVP, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of AVP, Inc.

                                         By:/s/ Leonard Armato
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             Leonard Armato
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                         By:/s/ Andrew Reif
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             Andrew Reif
                                             Chief Financial Officer

May 23, 2005
STATE v. MARTIN.

No. COA08-366.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 4, 2008.

Certification Date November 24, 2008.

Appeal from Cleveland (06CRS2705).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded for resentencing.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jbarre Jequiz HOPE.

No. 154P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Brian Aus, Durham, for Hope.

John Maddrey, Assistant Solicitor General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*316Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 657 S.E.2d 909.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of April 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
LIVESAY v. CAROLINA FIRST BANK.

No. COA08-1102.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from Henderson (05CVS2081).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10860

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JEREMY MICHAEL HAYS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-3-3

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jeremy Michael Hays has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hays has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
**Exhibit 23.1**
 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

         We have issued our report dated March 23, 2001, accompanying theconsolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report ofPopMail.com, inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000. We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the RegistrationStatements of PopMail.com, inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-93317, File No.333-96109, File No. 333-32232, File No. 333-40694, File No. 333-43774, and File No.333-46468) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-41966 and File No. 333-47738).

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

Minneapolis, MinnesotaMarch 29, 2001
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 745/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 745/2014 of 9 July 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 745/2014                     

# of 9 July 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# **Exhibit 32.2**

# ** **

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

# ** **

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the Chief Financial Officer ofWestern Sizzlin Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 and the financial statements containedtherein, fully comply with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Qand the financial statements thereto fairly present, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March31, 2006, and the period then ended.

 

 
| /s/ Robyn B. Mabe |   | May 12, 2006 |
|-------------------|--------|--------------|

 

1

----