alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Christopher John HORTON.

No. 367P15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Dec. 15, 2015.

Sherri G. Horner, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Christopher Horton, Windsor, for Horton, Christopher John

Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th of November 2015 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2015."

ERVIN, J. recused.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Telecommunications Income Fund XI (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
O. Brendengen, Chief Financial Officer of Commercial Power Finance, Inc.,
General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 29, 2004                      /s/  Ronald O. Brendengen
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                         Ronald O. Brendengen
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         Commercial Power Finance, Inc.
                                         General Partner
                                         Telecommunications Income Fund XI, L.P.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ of LIN
Television Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Gary R. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, William A.
Cunningham, Vice President and Controller, Deborah R. Jacobson, Vice President
of Corporate Development and Treasurer, and Peter E. Maloney, Vice President of
Finance, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

         Dated: November 17, 2003  /s/ Gary R. Chapman
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Gary R. Chapman
                                   Chief Executive Officer

         Dated: November 17, 2003  /s/ William A. Cunningham
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   William A. Cunningham
                                   Vice President and Controller

         Dated: November 17, 2003  /s/ Deborah R. Jacobson
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Deborah R. Jacobson
                                   Vice President of Corporate Development and
                                   Treasurer

         Dated: November 17, 2003  /s/ Peter E. Maloney
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Peter E. Maloney
                                   Vice President of Finance
STATE v. James Donald KING.

No. 204A99-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 21, 2008.

Diane Reeves, Raleigh, for Special Deputy Attorney General.

R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of November 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (King) shall have up to and including the 8th day of January 2009 to file and serve his/her Petition *904for Writ of Certiorari with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of November 2008."
STATE v. Reginald U. FULLARD.

No. 43P15-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Aug. 20, 2015.

Reginald Fullard, For Fullard, Reginald U.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of N.C.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th of July 2015 by Defendant for Order of Transcripts:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
# CE2004078EN.01004601.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/46

---

(2004/C 78 E/0044)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1781/03

by Claude Moraes (PSE) to the Commission

(28 May 2003)

Subject:   The EQUAL funding programme post-enlargement

Subject:

Can the Commission please provide information or analysis on how the EQUAL funding programme will be affected by the enlargement of the EU in 2004?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(14 July 2003)

(14 July 2003)

The table below gives the breakdown of the financial envelope for the Accession Countries for EQUAL by country, and has been prepared in full compliance with the decisions of the European Council at Copenhagen (12 and 13 December 2002).

The figures for each year have been indexed to the prices of the year in question, and the total figures for the period 2004-2006 are shown below:

| — | Cyprus: EUR1 808 504; |
| --- | --- |

—

Cyprus: EUR1 808 504;

EUR

| — | Czech Republic: EUR 32 095 830; |
| --- | --- |

—

Czech Republic: EUR 32 095 830;

| — | Estonia: EUR4 067 447; |
| --- | --- |

—

Estonia: EUR4 067 447;

EUR

| — | Hungary: EUR 30 287 325; |
| --- | --- |

—

Hungary: EUR 30 287 325;

| — | Latvia: EUR 8 024 512; |
| --- | --- |

—

Latvia: EUR 8 024 512;

| — | Lithuania: EUR 11 864 504; |
| --- | --- |

—

Lithuania: EUR 11 864 504;

| — | Malta: EUR1 240 962; |
| --- | --- |

—

Malta: EUR1 240 962;

EUR

| — | Poland: EUR 133 916 932; |
| --- | --- |

—

Poland: EUR 133 916 932;

| — | Slovakia: EUR 22 262 812; |
| --- | --- |

—

Slovakia: EUR 22 262 812;

| — | Slovenia: EUR 6 441 243. |
| --- | --- |

—

Slovenia: EUR 6 441 243.

The financial envelopes of the existing Member States will remain unchanged. The total budget available for EQUAL will, therefore, increase by EUR 252 010 071 as a result of enlargement.

---
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN TV Corp. for the three monthsended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Vincent L. Sadusky, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.             Dated: November 9, 2006 /s/ Vincent L. Sadusky   Vincent L. Sadusky   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of Bingham

Bloomfield Acceptance Company, L.L.C., a Michigan limited liability company
Bloomfield Servicing Company, L.L.C., a Michigan limited liability company
Hartger & Willard Mortgage Associates, Inc., a Michigan corporation
Systems/Software Solutions, Inc., a Michigan corporation (also d/b/a
e-cognita.com, inc.)
Dynex Financial, Inc., a Virginia corporation (also d/b/a Dynex Services)
Dynex Financial of Alabama, Inc., a Virginia corporation
Dynex Insurance Agency, Inc., a Virginia corporation
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1085

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GLASS HEALTH ASSOCIATION,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MARYLAND,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Senior District

Judge. (1:97-cv-02103-FNS)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion to vacate the order denying his

motion to reopen a civil action. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Wilder v. Glass Health Ass’n, No.

1:97-cv-02103-FNS (D. Md. Dec. 26, 2007). Wilder’s motion for

appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 99.26****CONSENT OF S. RISTORCELLI**     I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the following report and documents,which are being filed as exhibits to and incorporated by reference into the registration statementon Form 40-F of Goldcorp Inc. (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission: 1. The technical report dated December 31, 2007 and amended February 19, 2008entitled “Amended Penasquito Project Technical Report Concepción del Oro District,Zacatecas State, México” (the “Amended Penasquito Report”); and  2. The annual information form of the Company dated March 25, 2008, which includesreference to my name in connection with information relating to the Amended PeñasquitoReport, the El Sauzal Mine, and the properties described therein.Date: March 25, 2008         /s/ Steven Ristorcelli   Name:  Steven Ristorcelli, P. Geo.   Title:  Mine Development Associates, Inc.
#### Sun Mei Inc. et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Donna Chen et al., Defendants, and 101 Maiden Lane Realty Co., LLC, Respondent-Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 133]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered January 21, 2004, which dismissed the action on grounds of res judicata and collateral estoppel but did not impose sanctions or award defendants attorneys’ fees, unanimously modified, on the law, the application for attorneys’ fees granted and the matter remanded for calculation of said award, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

According the complaint a liberal construction, accepting the facts as true, and making all inferences in plaintiffs’ favor *(Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), the complaint was properly dismissed. Because plaintiffs’ challenge to the existence and validity of the lease at 225 Centre Street in Manhattan had earlier been litigated and brought to a final conclusion, these subsequent claims with respect to validity of the lease *266were barred by res judicata *(O’Brien v City of Syracuse,*54 NY2d 353, 357 [1981]; *Marinelli Assoc. v Helmsley-Noyes Co.,*265 AD2d 1 [2000]). Since the validity of the lease was decided in a prior proceeding in which plaintiffs had a full and fair opportunity to contest the issue, this action was also barred by collateral estoppel *(see Allied Chem. v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.,*72 NY2d 271, 276 [1988], *cert denied*488 US 1005 [1989]; *see also Parker v Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co.,*93 NY2d 343, 349 [1999]).

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in failing to impose sanctions under Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 130-1.1. However, because the leases provided for payment of reasonable legal fees, the court erred in failing to grant defendants’ application for such an award. The matter should be remanded for calculation of attorneys’ fees.

We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them without merit. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.3


                       RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
                                  EXHIBIT 99.3
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the sole general partner of Reckson
Operating Partnership, L.P. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1)       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                  and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  December 16, 2002



                               Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.
                                 By: Reckson Associates Realty Corp.,
                                     its sole general partner



                                   By /s/ Michael Maturo
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President,
                                       Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 632 

To provide for a hospital in Cass County, Minnesota. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Mr. COLEMAN (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for a hospital in Cass County, Minnesota. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MEDICARE CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL DES4 IGNATION. 

5 Section 405(h) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 

6 Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 

7 108–173; 117 Stat. 2269) is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION.— 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made 

11 by paragraph (1) shall not apply to the certifi12 cation by the State of Minnesota on or after 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 632 IS

1 January 1, 2006, under section 

2 1820(c)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Social Security Act 

3 (42 U.S.C. 1395i–4(c)(2)(B)(i)(II)) of one hos4 pital that meets the criteria described in sub5 paragraph (B) and is located in Cass County, 

6 Minnesota, as a necessary provider of health 

7 care services to residents in the area of the hos8 pital. 

9 ‘‘(B) CRITERIA DESCRIBED.—A hospital 

10 meets the criteria described in this subpara11 graph if the hospital— 

12 ‘‘(i) has been granted an exception by 

13 the State to an otherwise applicable statu14 tory restriction on hospital construction or 

15 licensing prior to the date of enactment of 

16 this subparagraph; and 

17 ‘‘(ii) is located on property which the 

18 State has approved for conveyance to a 

19 county within the State prior to such date 

20 of enactment.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
# CE2004078EN.01023701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/237 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/237

---

(2004/C 78 E/0239)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3187/03

by Geoffrey Van Orden (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(27 October 2003)

Subject:   Free movement of bankrupt persons in the EU

Subject:

A person who has been declared bankrupt in the UK is free to live anywhere they wish in the UK.

Is a person who has been declared bankrupt in the UK free to live anywhere they wish in the EU in the same way that a citizen not declared bankrupt would be able to?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(17 December 2003)

(17 December 2003)

A Union citizen who has been declared bankrupt in the United Kingdom is free to live anywhere he/she wishes in the territory of the Union if he/she fulfils the conditions applying to the right of residence under Community legislation, i.e. being a worker or self-employed person or having adequate resources and sickness insurance.

In this respect, Community legislation does not provide any specific limitation to the right of free movement.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Billy Edwards GRIMES.

No. 509P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Billy E. Grimes, Pro Se.

Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 10th day of November 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of November 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed' by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
Exhibit 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to, and as required  by, 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of  2002,  that  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Hauppauge  Digital,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  December 31, 2003 fully  complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated:   February 13, 2004                             /s/ Kenneth Plotkin
                  --                                   -------------------------
                                                       Kenneth Plotkin
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                                       /s/ Gerald Tucciarone
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Gerald Tucciarone
                                                       Chief Financial Officer




                                       3
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

          I, Randolph F. Williams, certify that:

          1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of LSB Financial Corp. (the "Registrant");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statement were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          4.   The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe registrant and have:

                    a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                    b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresas of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                    c)   disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

          5.   The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

NEXT PAGE

                    a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

                    b)   any fraud, whether of not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 10, 2004

| /s/ Randolph F. WilliamsRandolph F. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|