alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**







**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph P. Ciavarella,
      Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent disclosed therein; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:May
                13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Joseph P. CiavarellaJoseph
                P. Ciavarella
              Acting
                Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT** **32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Clickable Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 200 6 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), each of
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:June
                    29, 2006
                By:
                /s/
                  Nicholas
                  Cirillo, Jr.Name:
                Nicholas
                    Cirillo, Jr.,Title:
                President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                    Executive Officer)
# CE2004070EN.01009101.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/91 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/91

---

(2004/C 70 E/093)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2365/03

by Salvador Garriga Polledo (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 July 2003)

Subject:   Delimitation of fisheries zones as between Portugal and Spain

Subject:

The president of the Spanish Association of Skilled Nautical Personnel has called for a clear delimitation of the fishing limits between Spain and Portugal, with a view to avoiding any further arrests of Spanish fishermen and putting the required end to such disputes between countries which are friends and neighbours and are both EU Member States.

The same person considers it unacceptable that such problems should exist between EU Member States. It follows, in the view of Spain's fishermen, that the fisheries zones need to be delimited in order to prevent any further conflicts.

Does the Commission believe it to be its responsibility, under the EU's common fisheries policy, to act with a view to resolving the conflict over the delimitation of fisheries zones as between Spain and Portugal, thus putting an end to the present unacceptable climate of conflict and, especially, the practice of punishing Spanish fishermen's incursions into Portuguese waters with prison sentences?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(13 August 2003)

(13 August 2003)

The new legal basis of the Common Fisheries Policy, Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 (1), clearly enshrines the principle of free access to waters and resources by all Community vessels, subject to the relevant Community rules on fisheries management.

1

Re-introducing limitations to access in areas of national jurisdiction on the basis of nationality would be contrary to the above principle. The Commission must ensure that fisheries access and conservation and management measures are based on the principle of non-discrimination.

The Commission also believes that the existence of certain conflicts among fishermen would not justify a failure to apply and enforce Community principles. The Commission is actively contributing to find a solution to the problem of the access to Portuguese continental waters in the context of the proposal for an effort regime in western waters. But the Commission is convinced that any solution in this regard must be fully in conformity with the above-mentioned principles.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy, OJ L 358, 31.12.2002.

1

---
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T Nov. 20, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S
F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o
. 0 9

- 1 3 1 5 6 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o
. 0 7

- 0 0 7 0 3

- C V

- G E T

- 1

C A R L Y L E W R I G H T , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l a n t ,

A M E R I C A N I N T E R S T A T E I N S U R A N C E C O M P A N Y , e t a l

. , I n t e r v e n o r s - P l a i n t i f f s ,

v e r s u s
U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l e e
.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f G e o r g i a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( N o v e m b e r 2 0 , 2 0 0 9 )
B e f o r e B L A C K , P R Y O R a n d H I L L , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
.P E R C U R I A M :

P l a i n t i f f

- a p p e l l a n t C a r l y l e W r i g h t f i l e d t h i s a c t i o n a g a i n s t t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s

o f A m e r i c a u n d e r t h e F e d e r a l T o r t C l a i m s A c t , 2 8 U

. S

. C

. § 1 3 4 6 ( b ) a n d § § 2 6 7 1

e t s e q
. , f o r p e r s o n a l i n

j u r y s u f f e r e d w h e n s t r u c k b y a U n i t e d S t a t e s P o s t a l S e r v i c e
f o r k l i f t

. F i n d i n g t h a t W r i g h t w a s t h e b o r r o w e d s e r v a n t o f t h e P o s t a l S e r v i c e a t t h e 1

t i m e o f t h e a c c i d e n t , t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d e t e r m i n e d t h a t W r i g h t ’ s c l a i m s a g a i n s t t h e
U n i t e d S t a t e s w e r e b a r r e d b y t h e G e o r g i a W o r k e r s ’ C o m p e n s a t i o n A c t

. O

. C

. G

. A

. § 3 4

- 9

- 1 1 ( a )

. 2

T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t g r a n t e d t h e g o v e r n m e n t ’ s m o t i o n f o r s u m m a r y j u d g m e n t

a n d t h i s a p p e a l f

o l l o w s
. W e h a v e t h o r o u g h l y r e v i e w e d t h e r e c o r d i n t h i s a p p e a l ,

3
i n c l u d i n g t h e b r i e f

s a n d t h e a r g u m e n t s o f c o u n s e l f o r b o t h p a r t i e s
. F i n d i n g n o

e r r o r , w e a f

f i r m t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t

. A F F I R M E D

.

Wright wa s employ ed as a truck drive r for

H & H Tra

nsport at the time of the a ccide nt. 1 H & H Tra

nsport had a c ontrac t with the Post al Service to transfe r mail from a centr al metropolitan distribution center to outly ing posta l service fac iliti es. Wright had pr eviously

settled a wor

ker’ s compensation cla im ag ainst H & H Tra nsport 2 for $120,000. The district cour

t did not reac h the g overnme nt’s alterna te ar g ument in favor of 3 summary judgme nt, on the basis of judicial estoppel, due to Wright’s fa ilure to disclose his tort claim on ce rtain bankr

uptcy filings, a nd neither do w e.

2
ACCEPTED 03-14-00678-CR 4878562 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/14/2015 11:33:51 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK



### EX PARTE IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

• 

### NO. 03-14-00678-CR LESLIE PARKER JONES MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW, Keith S. Hampton and Leslie Parker Jones, and files this his Motion to Dismiss Appeal, pursuant to Rule 42.2 ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, and in support thereof, would show the Court the following: 

### I. Leslie Parker Jones was found guilty ofaggravated assault in Cause No. DD1-DC-08-303025 on January 22, 2009. He was sentenced to ten years of community supervision. On October 24, 2014, Appellant filed his notice ofappeal from writproceedings conductedpursuantto Article 11.072 ofthe Code ofCriminal Procedure. 

### II. After a carefulreview ofhis appeal, Appellantand his counsel move to dismiss the appeal.

### III. This Motionto Dismiss Appeal is filed in duplicate and pursuantto Rule 42.2, the duplicate should be sent to the Travis County District Clerk. Respectfully submitted,

·--... , ..:..o·-

__**;; ~**  KEITH S. HAMPTON Attorney at Law 1103 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 476-8484 (o) (512) 762-6170 (c) (512) 477-3580 (f) keithshampton@gmail.com SBN# 08873230

2' 

# /
ESLIE PARKER JONES, Appellant •

By affixing my signature above, I, KEITH S. HAMPTON, hereby certify that a true copy ofMotion to Dismiss Appeal has been delivered to the Travis County District Attorney's Office on this day, April 13, 2015.
STATE v. GAY.

No. COA07-927.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (05CRS240920).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
Exhibit 23.1

The Board of Directors
Electric Lightwave, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement Form
S-8 (no. 333-61009) of Electric Lightwave,  Inc. our report dated March 1, 1999,
relating to the balance  sheets of Electric  Lightwave,  Inc. as of December 31,
1998 and 1997, and the related statements of operations,  shareholders'  equity,
and cash flows for the years in the  three-year  period ended December 31, 1998,
which  report  appears in the  December  31, 1998 annual  report on Form 10-K of
Electric Lightwave, Inc.

New York, New York
March 1, 1999
HAMILTON v. NORTON DOORS/YALE SEC., INC.

No. COA08-548.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 589494).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DonnaBrandin, Chief Financial Officer of Equity Residential, general partner ofERPOP, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.
| /s/ Donna Brandin       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Donna Brandin           |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| of Equity Residential   |   |
| November 6, 2006        |   |

 

** **

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 175 (Monday, September 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18086]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Announcing a Partially Open Meeting 
of the Board of Directors

Time and Date: The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled 
to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, September 14, 2005. The closed 
portion of the meeting will follow immediately the open portion of the 
meeting.

Place: Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye 
Street NW., Washington DC 20006.

Status: The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public. 
The final portion of the meeting will be closed to the public.

Matters to be Considered at the Open Portion: 
    Fiscal Year 2006 Budget. The Board of Directors will consider a 
resolution adopting the Finance Board's fiscal year 2006 budget.
    Annual Performance Budget for Fiscal Year 2006. The Government 
Performance and Results Act of 1993 and Office of Management and Budget 
Circular A-11 require agencies to produce an Annual Performance Budget 
that links performance goals with costs for achieving a target level of 
performance. The Board of Directors will consider a resolution adopting 
a Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Performance Budget for the Finance Board.

Matter to be Considered at the Closed Portion: 
    Periodic Update of Examination Program Development and Supervisory 
Findings.

Contact Person for More Information: Shelia Willis, Paralegal 
Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or 
[email protected].

    By the Federal Housing Finance Board.

    Dated: September 8, 2005.
Neil R. Crowley,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-18086 Filed 9-8-05; 12:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
```
STATE v. Samuel Travis TANNER.

No. 474P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 20, 2008.

William D. Spence, Kinston, for Tanner.

C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 666 S.E.2d 845.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of October 2008 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 20th day of October 2008."
Wellington CRUTCHFIELD, Employee v. CAROLINA FOOTBALL ENTERPRISES, INC., Uninsured-Employer and Travelers Insurance Company, Carrier.

No. 223P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

John A. Hedrick, Raleigh, April D. Seguin, for Crutchfield.

Susan Vanderweert, Raleigh, for Travelers Ins. Co.

Kristine L. Prati, for Carolina Football Enterprises.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 27th day of May 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."

HUDSON, J., recused.
NUMBER 13-08-00404-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ANTHONY CORTINAS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 105th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Anthony Cortinas, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated sexual

assault of a child. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the

defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On June 24, 2008, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant

has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to

whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

On July 31, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response

does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that

appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered 

and filed this the 21 day of August, 2008. st
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 487 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Organ Transplant Act to clarify 

that kidney paired donations shall not be considered to 

involve the transfer of a human organ for valuable consideration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Living Kidney Organ 

5 Donation Clarification Act of 2007’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

S 487 RFH 

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL ORGAN TRANS2 PLANT ACT. 

3 Section 301(a) of the National Organ Transplant Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 274e(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: ‘‘For purposes of this section, kidney paired do6 nation shall not be considered to involve the transfer of 

7 a human organ for valuable consideration.’’. 

8 SEC. 3. REPORT. 

9 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

10 of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of 

11 Health and Human Services shall submit to the appro12 priate committees of Congress a report that details the 

13 progress made towards understanding the long-term 

14 health effects of living organ donation. 

Passed the Senate February 15, 2007. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”);                and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **SIGNATURE**                                                                                                          | **TITLE** | **DATE**                               |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                   |      |                                   |
|                              /s/ Wo Hing Li |      | Chief                Executive Officer | October                12, 2007 |
| Wo                Hing Li                                                                                              |      |
|                                                                                                                   |      |                                   |
|             /s/              Leada Tak Tai Li              |      | Chief                Financial Officer | October                12, 2007 |
| Leada                Tak Tai Li                                                                                        |      |

----
Addendum No. 2 to the Binding Site Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.30

 [*] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. 
 Addendum No. 2 to the Distribution
Agreement 
 This Addendum No. 2 to the Distribution Agreement (the “Addendum”) is made and entered
into as of this 15th day of June, 2007, by and between diaDexus, Inc. (“DIADEXUS”), and The Binding Site (“BINDING SITE”). 
 WHEREAS, BINDING SITE and DIADEXUS are parties to a Distribution Agreement effective January 30, 2007 and modified it with Addendum No. 1 on February 1, 2007 (collectively, the
“Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend such Agreement as follows: 

[*] 
 Please insert the following into
Exhibit A. 
 [*] 
  

							
	 Description
	  	 Unit
	  	Catalog #	  	Lab Price
	 [*] PLAC® Test Kit for Lp-PLA2
	  	 96-well microplate ELISA kit
	  	90106	  	[*]

 BINDING SITE recognizes the importance to
DIADEXUS that BINDING SITE make best efforts to expedite the rate at which customers go live with commercial sales and new customers are enabled. Accordingly both DIADEXUS and BINDING SITE will review this Addendum No. 2 [*] and if
BINDING SITE is making solid commercial efforts to advance Product sales, DIADEXUS will [*]. 
 In addition, all BINDING SITE sales
reporting pursuant to Section 3 (c) provided to DIADEXUS shall be certified for financial accuracy by a financial officer of BINDING SITE. 







  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Addendum to be executed by their fully authorized representatives. 
  

									
	BINDING SITE	 	 	 	DIADEXUS
					
	BY:	 	 /s/ R. Rowland
	 		 	BY:	 	 /s/ Patrick Plewman

	Printed Name: R. Rowland	 		 	Printed Name: Patrick Plewman
			
	Title: CEO	 		 	Title: President & CEO
			
	Date: 6/15/07	 		 	Date: 6/19/07
IN RE A.J.

No. COA08-1218.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 3, 2009.

Certification Date March 23, 2009.

Appeal from Jackson (06J89, 07J37).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>                                                    EXHIBIT 23

                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


  We hereby consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Prospectus
constituting  part  of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.  333-34835
and No. 333-34835-01) of Price Development Company, Limited Partnership of our
report dated February  2,  2000,  on  our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules  of  Price  Development  Company,
Limited Partnership as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for the years  ended
December  31,  1999,  1998  and  1997, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 24, 2000