alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Randolph F. Williams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of LSB Financial Corp. (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statement were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe registrant and we have:

> 
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresas of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> 
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether of not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 13, 2003

/s/ Randolph F. WilliamsRandolph F. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LIN TV Corp. for the three monthsended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, Gary R. Chapman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Vincent L.Sadusky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: August 9, 2005 /s/ Gary R. Chapman   Gary R. Chapman   Chief Executive Officer           Dated: August 9, 2005 /s/ Vincent L. Sadusky   Vincent L. Sadusky   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 3.9

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            DOVE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

           The undersigned certify that:

1.      They are the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Secretary,
        respectively, of Dove Entertainment, Inc., a California corporation (the
        "Corporation").

2.      Article I of the Corporation's Articles of Incorporation is amended in
        its entirety to read as follows:

The name of this corporation is NewStar Media Inc.

3.      The amendment herein set forth has been duly approved by the Board of
        Directors of the Corporation.

4.      The amendment herein set forth has been duly approved by the required
        vote of the shareholders in accordance with Section 902 of the
        California Corporations Code. The total number of outstanding shares of
        common stock of the Corporation is 6,341,544. The number of shares
        voting in favor of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required.
        The percentage vote required was more than 50%.

We further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and correct
of our own knowledge.

Dated:  May 1, 1998


                                           /s/ RONALD LIGHTSTONE
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Ronald Lightstone, President and 
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ ROBERT MURRAY
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert Murray, Secretary
EXHIBIT 99.3


                       RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
                                  EXHIBIT 99.3
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the sole general partner of Reckson
Operating Partnership, L.P. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1)       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                  and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 12, 2002



                               Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.
                                 By: Reckson Associates Realty Corp.,
                                     its sole general partner



                                   By /s/ Michael Maturo
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President,
                                       Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
RICKY DEWAYNE FRAZIER,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2745

Opinion filed November 4, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Regional Conflict Counsel, and Wesley G. Nicholls, II, Assistant 

Regional Conflict Counsel, Pensacola, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed belated 

appeals from the judgments and sentences rendered June 2, 2015, in Escambia County 

Circuit Court case numbers 2014-CF-004011-A, 2014-CF-004012-A, 2014-CF-
2

004013-A, 2014-CF-004014-A, 2014-CF-004015-A, 2014-CF-004017-A, 2014-CF004019-A, 2014-CF-004020-A, 2014-CF-004022-A, 2014-CF-004024-A, 2014-CF004026-A, 2014-CF-004028-A, 2014-CF-004029-A, and 2014-CF-004451-A. Upon 

issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk 

of the circuit court for treatment as the notices of appeal. If petitioner qualifies for 

appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on 

appeal.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
# CE2004084EN.01046101.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/461 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/461

---

(2004/C 84 E/0536)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0806/03

by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 March 2003)

Subject:   Violations of Community law in EU Member States

Subject:

Could the Commission provide a comparative table showing the violations of Community law committed by each EU Member State?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(7 April 2003)

(7 April 2003)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to the Commission's Nineteenth annual report to Parliament on monitoring the application of Community law (2001) (1).

1

---

(1)  COM(2002) 324 final.

1

---
STATE v. AIKEN.

No. COA08-224.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Buncombe (06CRS59373, 06CRS11633).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# C_2023278EN.01001501.xml

| 7.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureș (Romania) lodged on 21 March 2023 — ERB New Europe Funding II v YI

(Case C-178/23, ERB New Europe Funding II)

(2023/C 278/22)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Specializat Mureș

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant for revision: ERB New Europe Funding II

Respondent: YI

Question referred

When applying the provisions of Article 7(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC, (1) in the light of, in particular, the twenty-third recital of that directive and the principle of effectiveness, must those provisions be interpreted as not precluding the possibility for a national court to examine suspicions concerning the unfair nature of contractual terms stipulated in an agreement concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer, even when they have previously been examined by another national court in judicial proceedings at first instance at the request of the consumer, who did not attend the related hearing and was not properly assisted or represented by a lawyer, and have been rejected by a judicial decision which has never been challenged by the consumer — [and] which has, therefore, acquired, in the domestic procedural order, the force of res judicata — if, from the particular circumstances of the case, it appears, in a plausible and reasonable manner, that that consumer did not make use of the legal remedy in those first judicial proceedings because of his or her limited knowledge or information?

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

---
China Valves Technology, Inc.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.1

Loan Agreement



Party A: China Fluid Equipment Holding Co., Ltd. (Hong Kong)


Party B: Able Delight Investment Limited (Hong Kong) 

Whereas Party B is in need of funds to acquire equities
in Watts Valve (Changsha) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to “Changsha
Company”), upon consultation, Party A has agreed to lend and Party B has
agreed to borrow funds in an amount of Six Million One Hundred and Twenty
Thousand US Dollars (US$6,120,000). Party A and Party B hereby agree as follows:


Article 1. Loan amount: Six Million One Hundred and
Twenty Thousand US Dollars (US$6,120,000). 

Article 2. The loan interest rate of the loan shall be
implemented in accordance with the loan interest rate of a commercial bank for
the corresponding period. 

Article 3. The term of this loan is six (6) months,
commencing from the date on which the Party A remits first batch of funds into
the account of Party B. 

Article 4. Upon the acquisition of Changsha Company in
whole by Party B and after Party B sells to Party A all its controlled tangible
and intangible assets of Changsha Company at a reasonable price evaluated by an
evaluation firm acknowledged by both parties, Party A may be exempted from
performing the obligations under Article 2 above and this agreement shall be
terminated. Party A may offset its payment obligation owed to Party B under
Party A’s proposed acquisition of all assets of Changsha Company by using of the
borrowed funds as ascribed under this agreement. 

Article 5. If Party B and Party A fail to reach any
intent for the acquisition of Changsha Company, Party A may exercise its rights
subject to Article 1, Article 2, and Article 3 above of this agreement. 

Article 6. This agreement is executed in two (2) copies,
one copy for each party. 

Article7. Any unconcerned matters shall be solved
between parties through friendly consultations. 

Article 8. If any of the parties is in breach of this
agreement, the non-breaching party may have the right to file a lawsuit to Henan
Zhengzhou Intermediate People's Court. 

	Party A: China Fluid Equipment Holding Co., Ltd. 	Party B: Zhuo Yu Investment Co., Ltd.
  
		  
	Representative: 	Representative: 
	 	 
	December 10, 2009 	December 10, 2009
----

(2004/C 65 E/114)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1884/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(6 June 2003)

Subject:   Trade intensity in euro area

Will the Commission please estimate the relationship between trade growth and GDP growth in each of the Member States and indicate whether the advent of the euro has yet had any effect in increasing the trade intensity of GDP growth in participating Member States, compared with non-participating Member States, since its introduction on 1 January 1999?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(16 July 2003)

The Commission has conducted research in the past into the effects of the creation of the internal market on trade and gross domestic product (GDP) growth but has not recently updated these estimates.

Although to date the Commission has not made estimates for the specific contribution of the euro's introduction on trade developments, a number of studies indicate the introduction of the single currency has led to a significant increase in trade as stated in the reply by the Commission to the Honourable Member's Written Question E-1883/03 (1).

----

(1)OJ C 58 E, 6.3.2004, p. 106.

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1895
REI-JEU CHANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES S. MAXWELL; DANIEL S. WILLARD; YUE TIAN; FLOYD WILLIS, Temporary Trustee, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 00-1900
RICHARD CHANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES S. MAXWELL; YUE TIAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA00-740-PJM, CA-00-495-PJM) Submitted: August 28, 2001 Decided: October 1, 20012 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ning Ye, HEMENWAY & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C.; John D. Hemenway, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Brian M. Barke, MAXWELL & CO., L.L.C., Rockville, Maryland; Edward J. Hutchins, Jr., Stacey A. Moffet, ECCLESTON & WOLF, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: In appeal No. 00-1895, Rei-Jeu Chang appeals from the district court’s order abstaining from exercising jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a) (1994), to address Rei-Jeu’s claim of ownership of the stock of Erie Trade Inc. In appeal No. 00-1900, Richard Chang appeals from the district court’s orders (1) dismissing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) his complaintalleging that Yue Tian and James Maxwell engaged in conduct intended to inflict emotional distress upon him, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the briefs, the joint appendices, and the district court’s opinions and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. See Wilton v. Seven Falls Co. , 515 U.S. 277, 286-87 (1995) (holding that district court has broad discretion to abstain from exercising jurisdiction under § 2201(a)); Harris v. Jones, 380 A.2d 611, 613 (Md. 1977) (setting forth elements of cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress).Accordingly, we affirm in both of these appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Chang v. Maxwell , No. CA-00-740-PJM (D. Md. filed June 22, 2000; entered June 23, 2000), and Chang v. Maxwell , No. CA-00-495-PJM (D. Md. filed Apr. 25, 2000; entered Apr. 26, 2000 & filed June 1, 2000; entered June 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions4 are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# CE2004088EN.01034501.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/345 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/345

---

(2004/C 88 E/0352)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1290/03

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(4 April 2003)

Subject:   Anti-dumping measures applicable to the import of ferroalloys; the problem of the firm Ferroatlántica, located in Cee and Dumbria on the Costa da Morte in Galicia

Subject:

The development of the business of the firm Ferroatlántica, which manufactures ferroalloys and is of fundamental importance for the economy of the Costa da Morte in Galicia, is affected by the EU's importing these products at dumping prices from countries such as China, Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine. In view of the non-legitimate interests of the steel producers promoting these imports — quite apart from the unfair competition involved — ferroalloy manufacturers such as Ferroatlántica are urging the Commission to impose effective anti-dumping measures. The Commission started proceedings aimed at the adoption of anti-dumping measures, which did not meet with the approval of European ferroalloy manufacturers, since they seem to favour the steel manufacturers who use cheap imported products. What progress has been made on this issue, which affects the viability of companies like Ferroatlántica?

Answer given by Mr Lamy on behalf of the Commission

(7 May 2003)

(7 May 2003)

The Commission pays careful attention to problems of unfair trade suffered by the Community industry, and initiates investigations and proposes the imposition of remedial measures if the legal conditions are met. In the case of anti-dumping investigations, measures may be imposed by the Council if it is found that dumped products materially injure the Community industry, and that such measures would not be against the global interest of all economic operators concerned.

Based on duly documented requests by the Community ferroalloy industry, the Commission initiated 37 anti-dumping investigations concerning unfair trade in ferroalloys over the last ten years. This has led to the imposition of measures in 30 cases, seven of which continue to be under measures. The last investigation was initiated in October 2002 regarding imports of silicon metal originating in Russia—and in the same month a review investigation of the measures on the same product originating in China. These investigations are on-going, and it is expected that they will be concluded within 15 months after initiation. Should they confirm that unfair trade practices exist, the Commission will propose the extension of measures for five years for Chinese products, and the imposition, equally for five years, of remedial measures against Russian products.

Should any other unfair trade problems occur, the Commission remains, as always in the past, disposed to examine substantiated claims by the Community industry.

---
HINCEMAN v. FOOD LION.

No. COA08-538.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 391486).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, Remanded in part.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                DOCUMENTUM, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA; UNAUDITED)
 
                               Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                  September 30,             September 30,
                               ------------------         -----------------
                                 1996       1995           1996       1995
                               -------    -------         ------     ------
Net Income                     $ 1,352    $   381        $ 2,751    $   746
                                ======     ======         ======     ======
                                                     
Primary shares outstanding:                          
  Weighted average shares                            
    outstanding during the                           
    period                      14,029      1,574         13,689      1,574
  Common stock equivalent                            
    shares                         894     11,360(1)         975     11,360(1)
                                ------     ------         ------     ------
                                14,923     12,934         14,664     12,934
                                ======     ======         ======     ======
Primary net income per                               
  common stock and common                            
  stock equivalent share (2)   $  0.09    $  0.03        $  0.19    $  0.06
                                ======     ======         ======     ======

 
(1) Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission staff accounting bulletins,
    common and common equivalent shares, options and warrants issued by the
    company during the twelve month period prior to the initial public offering
    have been included as if they were outstanding for all periods presented.
 
(2) Fully diluted earnings per share is not required to be presented

                                      20.
----

(2004/C 65 E/099)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1684/03

by Jens-Peter Bonde (EDD) to the Commission

(20 May 2003)

Subject:   Definition of ‘contracts with the Commission’

Further to the Commission's answer of 11 February to my question, E-2968/02 (1), concerning the recruitment competition, I should like a more detailed definition of the term ‘contracts with the Commission’.

The answer reads as follows: ‘x candidates were called to the oral test exam. Of these, x had or have had contracts with the Commission’.

Will the Commission say whether the term ‘young national expert’ falls within the definition of ‘contracts with the Commission’?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(20 June 2003)

In the Commission's response of 11 February 2003, the reference to candidates having or having had ‘contracts with the Commission’ meant that those candidates had or have had ‘permanent’, ‘temporary’ or ‘auxiliary’ contracts with the Commission, under the provisions of Article 1 (18) and Article 2 (18) of Title I — General provisions of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Communities.

‘Seconded national expert’ contracts are not encoded in the Commission's database, nor is this information requested from those taking part in competitions.

----

(1)OJ C 192 E, 14.8.2003, p. 88.

----