alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.(a).1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Yosef Shiran, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Tefron Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.   disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

<PAGE>


     a.   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial data; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date: March 28, 2006

/s/ Yosef Shiran
-----------------------
Yosef Shiran
Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-5016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SEAN AARON MIMS, a/k/a Sean Aaron Mimms,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:07-cr-00150-REP)

Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 19, 2008

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig W. Sampson, Sr., BARNES & DIEHL, PC, Chesterfield, Virginia,

for Appellant. Samuel Eugene Fishel, IV, Special Assistant United

States Attorney, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sean Aaron Mims pled guilty to two counts of possession

of child pornography, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) (West 2000

& Supp. 2008), and was sentenced to the statutory maximum term of

120 months on each count, with the sentences partially concurrent

and partially consecutive, for a total sentence of 168 months

imprisonment. Under the terms of his plea agreement, Mims waived

his right to appeal any sentence within the statutory maximum “on

the grounds set forth in Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742

or on any ground whatsoever.” Mims now seeks to contest the

calculation of his advisory guideline range, challenging a fivelevel enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 2G2.2(b)(5) (2006), on the ground that the conduct underlying the

enhancement was a separate crime. The government has moved to

dismiss the appeal based on the waiver of appeal rights.

Mims concedes that he waived his right to appeal and that

the waiver was knowing and voluntary. See United States v. Brown,

232 F.3d 399, 402-06 (4th Cir. 2000). He contends that the issue

he seeks to raise is not within the scope of the waiver. We

disagree.

We therefore grant the government’s motion to dismiss and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            4,765 
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              134 
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                      1 
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0 
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      93,888 
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            5,492 
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              5,479 
<LOANS>                                         139,905 
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1,805 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  249,193 
<DEPOSITS>                                      191,226 
<SHORT-TERM>                                     14,936 
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4,764 
<LONG-TERM>                                      16,500 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0 
<PREFERRED>                                           0 
<COMMON>                                          8,026 
<OTHER-SE>                                        3,741 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  239,193 
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  11,002 
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 5,314 
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    200 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 16,516 
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                7,448 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8,922 
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             7,594 
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       505 
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  133 
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4,903 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2,543 
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2,543 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0 
<CHANGES>                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,755 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.67 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.60 
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     7.97
<LOANS-NON>                                       1,080 
<LOANS-PAST>                                        611 
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                      0 
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     931 
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1,360 
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        68 
<RECOVERIES>                                          8 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1,805 
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1,805 
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0 
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                               0 
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132884 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132884 COA: 265464 Wayne CC: 05-004422-01 KENNETH MAURICE COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 14, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 31.2

I, Jeffrey A. McCandless, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Tier Technologies, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|                         |  |                                                                       
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: December 19, 2003 |  | /s/JEFFREY A. MCCANDLESSJeffrey A. McCandless, Chief
Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
# C_2023007EN.01004101.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/41

---

Action brought on 7 November 2022 — López-Ibor Aliño v EUIPO — Dimensión Estratégica Quality Research (LOPEZ-IBOR ABOGADOS)

(Case T-672/22)

(2023/C 7/50)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Alfonso López-Ibor Aliño (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dimensión Estratégica Quality Research, SL (Madrid)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark LOPEZ-IBOR ABOGADOS — Application No 18 190 205

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2022 in Case R 500/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | stay the present proceedings until a final judgment has been given in the revocation proceedings against the EU trade mark 009566291 ESTUDIO JURÍDICO INTERNACIONAL LÓPEZ-IBOR MAYOR & ASOCIADOS, proceedings, 000053919 C, before EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

stay the present proceedings until a final judgment has been given in the revocation proceedings against the EU trade mark 009566291 ESTUDIO JURÍDICO INTERNACIONAL LÓPEZ-IBOR MAYOR & ASOCIADOS, proceedings, 000053919 C, before EUIPO;

| — | uphold the action brought against the contested decision and allow the EU trade mark applied for, order the other party to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the action brought against the contested decision and allow the EU trade mark applied for, order the other party to pay the costs;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs and the other party in the event that that party appears in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs and the other party in the event that that party appears in the present proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Incorrect assessment of the proof of use in accordance with Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Incorrect assessment of the proof of use in accordance with Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         5538843
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1482871
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    6811779
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          504360
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            509893
<LOANS>                                       27694240
<ALLOWANCE>                                      53000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                43134989
<DEPOSITS>                                    32715347
<SHORT-TERM>                                    360821
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             113876
<LONG-TERM>                                    3930153
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3317
<OTHER-SE>                                     6011475
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                43134989
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1818722
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               117191
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                459737
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2395650
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1126142
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1309640
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1086010
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   356500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 826881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  27743
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        4912
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4912
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .07
<LOANS-NON>                                     166000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 77000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   383000
<RECOVERIES>                                      2600
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                53000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             37000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          16000
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed June 24, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-1045

Lower Tribunal Nos. 81-25758C & 81-27294B

________________



### Paul Lewis,

Petitioner,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, Stephen T. Millan

, Judge.

Paul Lewis

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Paul Lewis appeals an order denying (as untimely) a motion to mitigate

sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). While an orderdenying, on its merits, a motion to mitigate a sentence is not appealable, see e.g.

,

Smith v. State

, 902 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), the appeal of an order

dismissing or denying the motion as untimely may be treated as a petition for writ

of certiorari. Iglesias v. State

, 76 So. 3d 370 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). We do so here

and, having reviewed the record, conclude the trial court correctly determined the

motion was untimely.

Petition dismissed.

2
STATE v. KIDD.

No. COA08-273.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (06CRS62260).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-11217

Conference Calendar

WILLIAM KELLY, JR

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CITY OF DALLAS; CITY COMMISSIONER’S COURT; JASON LE CARTER,

Sued individually and in official capacity; CRAIG MARTIN REDDEN, Sued

individually and in official capacity; JOHN E LARSEN, Sued individually and

in official capacity; DALLAS COUNTY; DALLAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

COURT;LUPE VALDEZ, Dallas County Sheriff sued individually and in official

capacity; MALLYIS MAULDIN, Dallas Medical Dr. sued individually and in

official capacity; UNKNOWN NURSES; DAVID M KUNKLE, Dallas City Police

Chief sued individually and in official capacity; SHERIFF DEPUTIES OF

DALLAS COUNTY JAIL, Sued individually and in official capacity

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CV-1510

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 19, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-11217

2

William Kelly, Jr. Texas prisoner # 559442, moves this court to proceed in

forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The district court dismissed the complaint as barred

by the applicable statute of limitations. The district court also denied Kelly’s

request to proceed IFP on appeal, certifying that the appeal was not taken in

good faith.

Kelly’s IFP motion is a challenge to the district court’s certification that

his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202

(5th Cir. 1997). However, Kelly does not address the district court’s reasons for

dismissing his § 1983 complaint. Because he fails to identify any error in the

district court’s analysis, any such argument is abandoned. See Brinkmann v.

Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Kelly has not shown that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal.

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, the motion

for leave to proceed IFP is denied, and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See

Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Both the district court’s dismissal of the complaint and this court’s

dismissal ofthe appeal count as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Kelly has one

previous strike. See Kelly v. Dallas Co. Sheriffs and Medical Dep’t, No. 3:95-CV0062-P (N.D. Tex. May 28, 1996). Because Kelly has accumulated three strikes,

he is barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he “is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury.” § 1915(g).

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR

IMPOSED.
STATE v. DUARTE.

No. COA04-1455-2.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 6, 2009.

Certification Date January 26, 2009.

Appeal from Henderson (03CRS52615).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Europos Sąjungos C 321A/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 321A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 61 metai2018m. rugsėjo 11d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 321A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

61 metai2018m. rugsėjo 11d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | Klaidų ištaisymas |
| 2018/C 321 A/01 | Pranešimo apie viešąjį konkursą EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 – Ginkluotieji saugumo ir apsaugos pareigūnai (SC 1/SC 2) klaidų ištaisymas ( OL C 305 A, 2018 8 30 ) | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

Klaidų ištaisymas

2018/C 321 A/01

Pranešimo apie viešąjį konkursą EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 – Ginkluotieji saugumo ir apsaugos pareigūnai (SC 1/SC 2) klaidų ištaisymas ( OL C 305 A, 2018 8 30 )

( OL C 305 A, 2018 8 30 )

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 11.9.2018 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 321/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2018

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 321/1

---

Pranešimo apie viešąjį konkursą EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 – Ginkluotieji saugumo ir apsaugos pareigūnai (SC 1/SC 2) klaidų ištaisymas

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 305 A, 2018 m. rugpjūčio 30 d.
  )

(2018/C 321 A/01)

8 puslapis, II priedas:

| yra: | „1. | per pastaruosius šešerius metus įgytą bent trejų metų profesinę ginkluotosios apsaugos ir (arba) intervencijos patirtį dirbant Vyriausybinėse, nacionalinėse ir (arba) tarptautinėse viešojo saugumo tarnybose, be kita ko, patirtį, įgytą privačiose apsaugos įmonėse, teikiančiose paslaugas tarptautinėms viešosioms organizacijoms, nuolatinėms ar diplomatinėms atstovybėms; į šią profesinę patirtį atsižvelgiama tik tuomet, jei ji papildo tą, kurios reikalaujama norint dalyvauti konkurse;“, |
| --- | --- | --- |

yra:

„1.

per pastaruosius šešerius metus įgytą bent trejų metų profesinę ginkluotosios apsaugos ir (arba) intervencijos patirtį dirbant Vyriausybinėse, nacionalinėse ir (arba) tarptautinėse viešojo saugumo tarnybose, be kita ko, patirtį, įgytą privačiose apsaugos įmonėse, teikiančiose paslaugas tarptautinėms viešosioms organizacijoms, nuolatinėms ar diplomatinėms atstovybėms; į šią profesinę patirtį atsižvelgiama tik tuomet, jei ji papildo tą, kurios reikalaujama norint dalyvauti konkurse;“,

| turi būti: | „1. | per pastaruosius aštuonerius metus įgytą bent trejų metų profesinę ginkluotosios apsaugos ir (arba) intervencijos patirtį dirbant Vyriausybinėse, nacionalinėse ir (arba) tarptautinėse viešojo saugumo tarnybose; į šią profesinę patirtį atsižvelgiama tik tuomet, jei ji papildo tą, kurios reikalaujama norint dalyvauti konkurse;“. |
| --- | --- | --- |

turi būti:

„1.

per pastaruosius aštuonerius metus įgytą bent trejų metų profesinę ginkluotosios apsaugos ir (arba) intervencijos patirtį dirbant Vyriausybinėse, nacionalinėse ir (arba) tarptautinėse viešojo saugumo tarnybose; į šią profesinę patirtį atsižvelgiama tik tuomet, jei ji papildo tą, kurios reikalaujama norint dalyvauti konkurse;“.

---