alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TEKGRAF, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,704,454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,876,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                   782,094
<INVENTORY>                                 12,899,522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,958,442
<PP&E>                                       2,659,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                 694,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,339,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,669,512
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,328
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,364,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,339,668
<SALES>                                    111,024,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           111,024,410
<CGS>                                       93,152,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               93,152,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             157,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (7,226,331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (108,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (7,118,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,118,331)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.16)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10(54)
 CANADIAN SERVICES AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
      1. TERM




---



##### 



2. UNDERWRITING SUPERVISION
  3. CLAIMS SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION




---



##### 



4. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE AND RELATED DUTIES




---



##### 



5. COMPENSATION
  6. INDEMNIFICATION




---



##### 



7. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF COMPANY
  8. ARBITRATION
  9. MODIFICATION
  10. BINDING EFFECT OF AGREEMENT




---



##### 



11. TERMINATION
    12. CONTRIBUTION
  13. RESOLUTION OF CONFLICTING TERMS
  14. SEVERABILITY




---



##### 



15. HONORABLE UNDERTAKING
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY (Canadian Branch)
 By:Printed Name:Title:Date:
 WESTERN SURETY COMPANY
 By:Printed Name:Title:Date:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G.
LaPerch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March
      16, 2010
              By:
              /s/ William G. LaPerchWilliam
      G. LaPerch
                Chief
      Executive Officer
# CE2004070EN.01001801.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/18

---

(2004/C 70 E/019)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3743/02

by Hanja Maij-Weggen (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(13 December 2002)

Subject:   Executions of Tibetans in China

Subject:

Is the Commission aware that on 2 December 2002 a Chinese Court sentenced two Tibetans, Tenzin Delek Rinpoche and Lobsang Dhondup to death for alleged involvement in a bomb attack?

Is the Commission aware that the evidence on the basis of which this sentence was made is extremely thin and has been called into doubt?

Is the Commission prepared to act at very short notice in order to bring pressure to bear on the Chinese authorities to prevent the executions, the first of which is planned to take place on 12 December and the second within two years?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(16 January 2003)

(16 January 2003)

The Commission has been informed of the death sentence imposed on the two Tibetans Tenzin Delek Rinpoche and Lobsang Dhondup on 2 December 2002, on the basis of their alleged involvement in a bomb attack. The Commission also took note that the proof on which the sentence was based and the way the trial has been carried out has been contested.

The Union immediately expressed its concern officially to the Chinese authorities within the time limit allowed by them so as to permit to the two Tibetans sentenced to death to lodge an appeal. Such appeals have since been lodged (in December 2002).

---
STATE v. GATLING.

No. COA08-607.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Hertford (94CRS577).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/1572Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/1572 of 18 September 2015 appointing an Austrian member and an Austrian alternate member of the            Committee of the Regions         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/1572                     

# of 18 September 2015

# appointing an Austrian member and an Austrian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Austrian Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116(1), (EU) 2015/190(2) and (EU) 2015/994(3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January                              2020.

(2)A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Hans NIESSL,

(3)An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr                              Christian ILLEDITS,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2020:                  
          -  Mr Christian ILLEDITS, *Landtagspräsident Burgenland*                          

# Article 2U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term                     of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:                  
          -  Mr Hans NIESSL, *Landeshauptmann Burgenland.*                          

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Dieschbourg                            

1

OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.                           

2

OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.                           

3

OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         568,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,065,992
<PP&E>                                      15,660,921
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,376,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,175,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,091,093
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,424,618
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,559,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,175,574
<SALES>                                      5,752,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,752,733
<CGS>                                        5,122,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,451,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             186,869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (878,897)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (878,897)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (878,897)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. 00-232 

2001 MT 63A 

______________ 

JIM TIMIS and CONNIE TIMIS, both 

individually and on behalf of their minor 

daughter, CHARDEE TIMIS, 

Plaintiffs and Appellants, 

v. 

MARK YOUNG, JOHN YOUNG and 

ROSE YOUNG, d/b/a ROSE'S DAY CARE, 

Defendants and Respondents. 

ORDER

______________

On April 27, 2001, appellants filed herein a petition for rehearing, and on May 4, 2001, 

respondents filed their objection thereto. The Court having considered the same, 

IT IS ORDERED that the first sentence of Paragraph 3 of this Court's opinion dated April 

18, 2001, is hereby amended to read: "Later, the Timises repudiated the agreement and 

refused to sign the settlement documents." 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied. 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (1 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm

DATED this 15th day of May, 2001. 

/S/ KARLA M. GRAY

/S/ W. WILLIAM LEAPHART

/S/ TERRY N. TRIEWEILER

/S/ JAMES C. NELSON

/S/ JIM REGNIER

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/00-232%20Order.htm (2 of 2)3/27/2007 4:24:22 PM
(LOGO)           One Jackson Place                      Phone: 601 948 6600
                 Suite 400                              Fax:   601 353 7246
                 188 East Capitol Street
                 Jackson, Mississippi 39201-2157




         Report of Independent Accountants on Management's Assertion on
          Compliance with Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the
             UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS

The Board of Directors
Cimarron Mortgage Company
and
President
Federal National Mortgage Association

We have examined  management's  assertion that Cimarron  Mortgage  Company ("the
Company")  complied  with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
MORTGAGE BANKERS (USAP) during the year ended December 31, 1997, included in the
accompanying  report title REPORT OF MANAGEMENT.  Management is responsible  for
the Company's  compliance  with those  requirements.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on  management's  assertion  about the  Company's  compliance
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's compliance with those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal  determination on the
Company's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company   complied  with the
aforementioned  requirements  during the year ended  December 31, 1997 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

                                                           /s/Ernst & Young LLP

March 19, 1998


       Ernst & Young LLP is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.
EXHIBIT 14.(a).2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

          We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report relating to our
     examination of the financial statements of AlbaHealth LLC covering the
     balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related statements
     of income, members' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
     2005 and 2004, appearing in the annual report of TEFRON LTD. (parent
     company) on Form 20-F, which is to be filed with U.S. Securities and
     Exchange Commission and to the incorporation by reference of such report
     into the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-128847)
     and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111932) of TEFRON LTD.



                                                     /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

                                                     Charlotte, North Carolina
                                                     March 29, 2006
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-15798

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:17-cr-14034-JEM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LOUIS HUFF, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(June 14, 2018)

Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Louis Huff negotiated a plea agreement with the government under which he 

agreed to plead guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute 

Case: 17-15798 Date Filed: 06/14/2018 Page: 1 of 3 
2

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). As part of that deal, Huff

broadly agreed to waive his right to appeal his sentence in exchange for the 

government’s promises to take certain actions at sentencing. The district court 

accepted Huff’s guilty plea and then sentenced him to 150 months of 

imprisonment, within the guideline range of 135 to 168 months. Huff now appeals 

his sentence, arguing that his sentence is unreasonably high. The government has 

moved to enforce the appeal waiver. We grant the government’s motion.

We will enforce an appeal waiver that was made knowingly and voluntarily. 

United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1294 (11th Cir. 2006); United States v. 

Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993). To prove that a waiver was 

made knowingly and voluntarily, the government must show that (1) the district 

court specifically questioned the defendant about the waiver during the plea 

colloquy; or (2) the record makes clear that the defendant otherwise understood the 

full significance of the waiver. Bushert, 997 F.2d at 1351. 

We enforce the waiver in Huff’s plea agreement. First, we find that the 

waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily. Huff was specifically questioned 

about the terms of the waiver, including its exceptions, during the plea colloquy, 

and Huff confirmed that he understood the waiver and had discussed it with his 

attorney. 

Case: 17-15798 Date Filed: 06/14/2018 Page: 2 of 3 
3

Second, no exception to the waiver applies. By agreeing to the waiver, Huff 

waived the right to appeal unless (a) the sentence exceeded the statutory maximum, 

(b) the sentence exceeded the guideline range, or (c) the government appealed. 

Because Huff’s sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum or his guideline

range and the government has not appealed, the waiver bars this appeal. 

For these reasons, we GRANT the government’s motion to dismiss Huff’s

appeal based on the sentence-appeal waiver in his plea agreement. 

Case: 17-15798 Date Filed: 06/14/2018 Page: 3 of 3
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 24, 2016

NO. 03-13-00619-CV

Argonaut Insurance Company and Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company, 

Appellants

v.

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and Ken Paxton, 

Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on August 19, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Exhibit













August 4, 2016




Chet Akiri


Dear Chet:


It is with great pleasure that I confirm the Compensation Committee has approved an enhanced compensation package for you effective April 18, 2016.  The new terms are outlined in the attached document (Exhibit A).
Chet, we are very pleased to see you excel in this expanded role within Bristow. Please feel free to contact me at 713-267-7601 if you have any questions.


My very best regards,






	
		
	/s/ Jonathan Baliff

	Jonathan Baliff

	President and CEO
	 






Attachment


	
		
	Offer Accepted:
	/s/ Chet Akiri

	 
	Chet Akiri

	 
	 

	Date:
	August 4, 2016














Bristow Group Inc.    2103 City West Blvd., 4th Floor, Houston, Texas 77042 United States         
t  (713) 267 7600    f  (713) 267 7620    bristowgroup.com










Exhibit A


SVP, Chief Commercial Officer and Interim SVP, Operations


Compensation Package




		
	Employer and Location:
	Bristow Group Inc. (the “Company”) located at 2103 City West Blvd, 3rd Floor, Houston, Texas  77042


		
	Compensation Structure:
	US based employment


		
	Effective Date:
	April 18, 2016


		
	Base Salary:
	$425,000 per year


		
	Bonus Percentage:
	Participation in the Company’s Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, including cash bonuses in accordance with the Senior Vice President level. Current annual incentive compensation for this position is a target bonus of 75% of Base Salary with a maximum of 187.5% of Base Salary.  This target percent will apply until the replacement SVP, Operations is identified and duties are fully transitioned.  Following this transition, the target bonus will revert to the percentage approved for comparable Sr. Vice Presidents which is currently 65% of Base Salary. 


		
	Additional Duties Allowance:
	$15,000 per month to compensate for the additional duties associated with the Interim SVP, Operations role.  This allowance will continue until the replacement SVP, Operations is identified and duties are fully transitioned.


		
	LTIP:
	Participation in the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan, including a target annual award for this position valued at 240% of Base Salary.
# C_2023104EN.01001601.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/16 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 2 January 2023 — X, Y, A, legally represented by X and Y, B, legally represented by X and Y v État belge (Case C-1/23, Afrin ( 1 )) (2023/C 104/20) Language of the case: French Referring court Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: X, Y, A, legally represented by X and Y, B, legally represented by X and Y Defendant: État belge Question referred Is the legislation of a Member State which only allows family members of a recognised refugee to submit an application for entry and residence at a diplomatic post of that State, even in a situation where it is impossible for those family members to travel to that post, compatible with Article 5(1) of Directive 2003/86/EC, ( 2 ) read, where appropriate, in conjunction with the objective pursued by that directive, to promote family reunification, Articles 23 and 24 of Directive 2011/95/EU, ( 3 ) Articles 7 and 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights ( 4 ) and the duty to ensure the effectiveness of EU law? ( 1 )  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings. ( 2 )  Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12). ( 3 )  Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast) (OJ 2011 L 337, p. 9). ( 4 )  Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

---
STATE v. FOSTER.

No. COA07-476.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Cumberland (05CRS62183, 05CRS65445, 05CRS67124, 06CRS50512).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.