alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54081-54082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18062]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committees on Rules 
of Appellate, Bankruptcy, Civil, and Criminal Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committees 
on Rules of Appellate, Bankruptcy, Civil, and Criminal Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments and open hearings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committees on Rules of Appellate, Bankruptcy, 
Civil, and Criminal Procedure have proposed new rules and amendments to 
the following rules:
    Appellate Rule: 25;
    Bankruptcy Rules: 1014, 3001, 3007, 4001, 6006, 7007.1, and new 
Rules 6003, 9005.1, and 9037;
    Civil Rule: New Rule 5.2, and Illustrative Forms; and
    Criminal Rules: 11, 32, 35, 45, and new Rule 49.1.
    Public hearings are scheduled to be held on the amendments to:
    <bullet> Appellate Rules in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 9, 2006;
    <bullet> Bankruptcy Rules in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 9, 2006;
    <bullet> Civil Rules in Chicago, Illinois, on November 18, 2005; 
and in Washington, DC, on December 2, 2005; and
    <bullet> Criminal Rules in Phoenix, Arizona, on January 9, 2006.
    Those wishing to testify should contact the Secretary at the 
address below in writing at least 30 days before the hearing. All 
written comments and suggestions with respect to the proposed 
amendments and new rules must be placed in the hands of the Secretary 
as soon as convenient and not later than February 15, 2006. They can be 
sent by one of the following three ways: by mail to Peter G. McCabe, 
Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial 
Conference of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary 
Building, Washington, DC 20544; by electronic mail at http://www.uscourts.gov/rules; or by facsimile to Peter G. McCabe at (202) 
502-1766. In accordance with established procedures all comments 
submitted are available for public inspection.
    The text of the proposed rules amendments and the accompanying 
Committee Notes can be found at the United States Federal Courts' Home 
page at http://www.uscourts.gov/rules.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.


[[Page 54082]]


    Dated: September 2, 2005.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 05-18062 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
exh10_7.htm


 










 


 


 


Exhibit 10.7







Administrative Services Agreement


Amendment No. 1







This Amendment dated March 5, 2008 to the Administrative Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) originally dated August 1, 2004 by and between iVoice, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (“iVoice”) and SpeechSwitch, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the “Company”).







WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to amend this Agreement.







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the respective promises and agreements of the parties set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:








	
1.  

	
Effective on September 1, 2005, the Services Fee shall be revised to equal Four Thousand and Two Hundred and Twenty Dollars and Ninety-six Cents ($4,220.96).








	
2.  

	
The Services Fees as defined in Section 3 of this Agreement and that are earned, accrued and remain unpaid shall be aggregated and converted into a Convertible Promissory Note in substantially the form as set forth in Exhibit A herein.








	
3.  

	
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of date written below:




 



	 iVoice, Inc.  	 SpeechSwitch, Inc.
	 	 
	 By:     /s/ Jerome Mahoney 	 By:    /s/ Bruce Knef
	            Jerome Mahoney  	          Bruce Knef
	            President and   	          President and
	            Chief Executive Officer 	          Chief Executive Officer
[ARTICLE] 9
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          SEP-30-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[CASH]                                        10365319
[INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS]                               0
[FED-FUNDS-SOLD]                                     0
[TRADING-ASSETS]                                     0
[INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE]                   70768280
[INVESTMENTS-CARRYING]                               0
[INVESTMENTS-MARKET]                                 0
[LOANS]                                       15530635
[ALLOWANCE]                                      25000
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                98500403
[DEPOSITS]                                    66255743
[SHORT-TERM]                                         0
[LIABILITIES-OTHER]                                  0
[LONG-TERM]                                     552302
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                         15000000
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                          8565
[OTHER-SE]                                    16683793
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY]                98500403
[INTEREST-LOAN]                                 302201
[INTEREST-INVEST]                              1137670
[INTEREST-OTHER]                                144573
[INTEREST-TOTAL]                               1584444
[INTEREST-DEPOSIT]                              840225
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                             1051199
[INTEREST-INCOME-NET]                           533245
[LOAN-LOSSES]                                        0
[SECURITIES-GAINS]                                   0
[EXPENSE-OTHER]                                 247537
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 292996
[INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY]                           0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                         0
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                   176919
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .23
[YIELD-ACTUAL]                                     .23
[LOANS-NON]                                          0
[LOANS-PAST]                                         0
[LOANS-TROUBLED]                                     0
[LOANS-PROBLEM]                                      0
[ALLOWANCE-OPEN]                                 25000
[CHARGE-OFFS]                                        0
[RECOVERIES]                                         0
[ALLOWANCE-CLOSE]                                25000
[ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC]                             25000
[ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN]                                  0
[ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED]                          25000
</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 65 E/206)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2679/03

by Jacques Poos (PSE) to the Commission

(10 September 2003)

Subject:   Customs union between Turkey and the pseudo-state, the TRNC

Can the Commission indicate whether the framework customs union agreement signed by Turkey and the pseudo-state of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) is compatible with the Customs Union Agreement in force since 1996 between the European Union and Turkey?

Under this agreement, customs duties were abolished and Turkey is required to apply the Common Customs Tariff to all imports from third countries.

If, however, the TRNC, according to the definition of the European Court of Human Rights, is not a third country, but a province of the Republic of Cyprus, temporarily under Turkish occupation and administration, is the Commission not obliged to make sure that all exports to the EU from the occupied area are accompanied by certificates of origin issued by the island's recognised authorities?

Can the Commission guarantee that Turkish exports to the EU comply with the signed agreement? If not, what does the Commission intend to do to ensure compliance with the law?

----
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/1210Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/1210 of 20 July 2015 appointing an Estonian member of the Committee of the Regions

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/1210                     

# of 20 July 2015

# appointing an Estonian member of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Estonian Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116(1), (EU) 2015/190(2) and (EU) 2015/994(3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January                              2020.

(2)A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Toomas VITSUT,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2020:                  
          -  Mr Kalev KALLO, *Chairman of Tallinn City Council.*                          

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 July 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

F. Mogherini                            

1

OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.                           

2

OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.                           

3

OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 618 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 618

           To further competition in the insurance industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2007

   Mr. Leahy (for himself, Mr. Specter, Mr. Lott, Mr. Reid, and Ms. 
   Landrieu) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To further competition in the insurance industry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Insurance Industry Competition Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--The Act of March 9, 1945 (59 Stat. 33; 15 U.S.C. 
1011 et seq.) (commonly known as the McCarran-Ferguson Act) is 
amended--
            (1) in section 2(b) (15 U.S.C. 1012(b)), by--
                    (A) inserting ``as it relates to unfair methods of 
                competition,'' after ``Commission Act, as amended,''; 
                and
                    (B) striking ``to the extent that such business is 
                not regulated by State law'' and inserting ``The 
                Federal Trade Commission Act, as it relates to areas 
                other than unfair methods of competition, shall be 
                applicable to the business of insurance to the extent 
                that such business is not regulated by State law.''; 
                and
            (2) by striking section 3 (15 U.S.C. 1013).
    (b) Federal Trade Commission Act.--Section 6 of the Federal Trade 
Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 46) is amended by striking the third 
undesignated paragraph following subsection (i).

SEC. 3. JOINT ENFORCEMENT POLICY STATEMENT.

    The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission may 
issue joint statements of their antitrust enforcement policies 
regarding joint activities in the business of insurance.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit No. 11.  Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings for the six and
                 three months ended June 30, 1998 and 1997 (in thousands except
                 per share data).

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                SIX MONTHS ENDED          THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                    JUNE 30,                    JUNE 30,
                                                ----------------          ------------------
                                                 1998      1997            1998        1997
                                                ------    ------          ------      ------
<S><C>
   Net income (loss)                            $  373    $  846          $  (65)     $  375
                                                ======    ======          ======      ======


   Weighted average shares outstanding           2,985     3,021           2,964       3,023

   Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
      effect of stock options                      134        96             143          99
                                                ------    ------          ------      ------


   Diluted weighted average common
      shares outstanding                         3,119     3,117           3,107       3,122
                                                ======    ======          ======      ======


   Basic earnings (loss) per share              $ 0.13    $ 0.27          $(0.02)     $ 0.12
                                                ======    ======          ======      ======

   Diluted earnings (loss) per share            $ 0.12    $ 0.27          $(0.02)     $ 0.12
                                                ======    ======          ======      ======
</TABLE>


                                       24
VI 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 660 

For the relief of Majan Jean. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. DODD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Majan Jean. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MAJAN 

4 JEAN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Majan Jean shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) 

12 or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 660 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Majan Jean enters 

2 the United States before the filing deadline specified in 

3 subsection (c), Majan Jean shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible for ad5 justment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 

6 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of en7 actment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Majan Jean, the Secretary of State shall instruct 

16 the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current or 

17 next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 

18 visas that are made available to natives of the country of 

19 birth of Majan Jean under section 203(a) of the Immigra20 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applica21 ble, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 

22 available to natives of the country of birth of Majan Jean 

23 under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. William Perry DUNCAN, III.

No. 386A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Michael E. Casterline, Asheville, for Duncan.

Donald Addison, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ____, 663 S.E.2d 13.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 19th day of August 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
BRASWELL v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INS. CO.

No. COA08-710.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 20, 2009.

Certification Date February 9, 2009.

Appeal from Wayne (04CVS1363).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2

                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Pierre Boutros, being an officer of The Bank of New York, a New York
Banking Corporation, the Trustee in respect of the S&P-Linked Investment Trust
Certificates, Series 1997-SP-1 Trust (the "Trust"), certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect
                  of the Trust in respect of periods covered by this annual
                  report of the Trust;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports,
                  taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a
                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
                  under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
                  the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required
                  to be provided to the Depositor or the certificateholders by
                  the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
                  agreement for inclusion in such distribution reports is
                  included in such reports; and

         4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
                  the Trustee under the pooling and servicing or similar
                  agreement and based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in
                  such reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations
                  under that agreement.

Date: March 27, 2006


         /s/ Pierre Boutros
-----------------------------------
Pierre Boutros, Assistant Treasurer
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2014 of 20 November 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2014                     

# of 20 November 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 November 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
McCALLISTER v. SUPERIOR COURT.

No. 290P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of June 2008 by Plaintiff to Disqualify Judge:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of December 2008."