alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004088EN.01003502.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/35

---

(2004/C 88 E/0038)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1497/03

by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission

(5 May 2003)

Subject:   Destruction of EU property in Palestine

Subject:

What is the current situation regarding EU-financial infrastructure in Palestine that has been destroyed or damaged the continuing conflict in the region?

Answer by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(23 June 2003)

(23 June 2003)

The Commission, upon the request of the Union's Presidency, compiled a preliminary list of EU-funded (Commission and Member States) projects which have either been destroyed or damaged by Israeli military forces. The list of destroyed projects is regularly updated by the Commission office in Jerusalem in coordination with the Member States' representative offices in Jerusalem and Ramallah. This task has been made difficult by the conditions on the ground. The list was last updated on 14 December 2002 bringing total damages to EUR 24 014 000. Of this total, about one-quarter was financed by the Community and the remainder by the Member States.

The exercise is limited to the replacement costs of physical infrastructure (construction and equipment), excluding indirect losses such as project delays or suspensions. Moreover the list does not make reference to a number of EU-funded projects which are unable to funtion properly due to Israeli military actions, for instance access to the European hospital in Gaza or delays (as a result of closures of access to raw materials) to infrastructure projects.

This matter has been raised with the Israeli authorities on several occasions, most notably by the Presidency of the Union in January 2002, and also at the Association Council with Israel on 21 October 2002.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# DATE AND TIME:

Wednesday, September 7th, 2005 1-4 p.m.

# PLACE:

Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20237.

# CLOSED MEETING:

                        The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and personnel issues, as well                               ( print page 52980)                            as sensitive procedural, budgetary, and personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6))                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact either Brenda Hardnett or Carol Booker at (202) 203-4545.

Dated: August 29, 2005.

Carol Booker,

Legal Counsel

[FR Doc. 05-17748 Filed 9-1-05; 3:46 pm]

BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
STATE v. HART.

No. COA05-1488-2.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 3, 2009.

Certification Date March 23, 2009.

Appeal from Lenoir (03CRS51385, 03CRS3321).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
f8k110810ex10ix_deyu.htm


Exhibit 10.9








Power of Attorney


 







 


Principal:


Identity Card No.:


Domicile:


Postal Code:


 


 


Trustee:


Identity Card No.:


Domicile:


Postal Code:


 







The Principal, __________, a citizen of the PRC, herein irrevocably authorizes the person (hereafter referred to as “Trustee”) designated by Detian Yu Biotechnology (Beijing) Co. Limited (“Detian Yu”) to exercise the following rights within the valid period of this Power of Attorney:


 


The authorized Trustee fully represents the principal to:


 


Exercise all the voting rights as shareholder of _____________ .(hereafter referred to as “_____________”), including but not limited to recommend and elect the directors, general manager and other senior management officers in the shareholders’ meeting of ______________ as the authorized representative of the Principal.


 


The premise of the above authority and appointment is that the Trustee is a citizen of the PRC and a regular employee of Detian Yu, and agrees to the above authority and appointment. Once the Trustee quits assuming any post in Detian Yu or Detian Yu issues a written notice of dismissing and replacing the Trustee, the Principal shall immediately withdraw the appointment and authority to the Trustee and appoint/authorize other employee of the PRC citizenship designated by Detian Yu to exercise the above voting rights of the Principal as shareholder of ______________ at the shareholders’ meeting of _____________________.


 


The Trustee shall cautiously and diligently carry out the fiduciary obligations within the scope of authority in accordance with the law, and hold the Principal free and harmless of all the possible losses/damages arising from such authorization and appointment (unless the losses/damages are due to the Principal’s intentional misconduct or gross negligence), otherwise the Trustee shall lawfully undertakes all legal responsibilities to the Principal and _______________.


 


The validity period of this Power of Attorney is 10 years, effectively from the issuing date of this Power of Attorney.


 


 


[Signature]


 


 


Nov. 16, 2010
STATE v. Charles Dion WARREN.

No. 312A15-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Oct. 1, 2015.

Bryan E. Gates, Jr., Winston-Salem, for Warren, Charles Dione.

James A. Wellons, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Susan I. Doyle, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

**Opinion**

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 30th of September 2015 by Defendant:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of October 2015."

Defendant shall have up to and including the 4th day of November 2015 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
IN RE T.S.

No. COA08-1321.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from Pitt (01JT116).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 63 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 63

     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 
  restriction that a clinical psychologist or clinical social worker 
provide services in a comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility 
            to a patient only under the care of a physician.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. Reid (for Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 
  restriction that a clinical psychologist or clinical social worker 
provide services in a comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility 
            to a patient only under the care of a physician.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Autonomy for Psychologists and 
Social Workers Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION THAT A CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST OR CLINICAL 
              SOCIAL WORKER PROVIDE SERVICES IN A COMPREHENSIVE 
              OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION FACILITY TO A PATIENT ONLY 
              UNDER THE CARE OF A PHYSICIAN.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(cc)(2)(E) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395x(cc)(2)(E)) is amended by striking ``physician'' and 
inserting ``physician, except that a patient receiving qualified 
psychologist services (as defined in subsection (ii)) may be under the 
care of a clinical psychologist with respect to such services to the 
extent permitted under State law and except that a patient receiving 
clinical social worker services (as defined in subsection (hh)(2)) may 
be under the care of a clinical social worker with respect to such 
services to the extent permitted under State law''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to services provided on or after January 1, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-1397

___________________________

Deborah Ann Francis

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Jeffrey Shorba; Mark Thompson; Leah Wermerskirchen

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: October 2, 2013

Filed: October 9, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Deborah Francis appeals from the district court’s adverse grant of summary 1

judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the grand jury selection process

in Minnesota’s Fourth Judicial District violates the Fourteenth Amendment. Upon

careful de novo review, see Schoelch v. Mitchell, 625 F.3d 1041, 1045-46 (8th Cir.

2010) (standard of review), we agree with the district court’s reasons for concluding

that Francis failed to establish a prima facie case for a Fourteenth Amendment

violation. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
EXHIBIT 99.2

                       RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
                                  Exhibit 99.2
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                     OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Scott H. Rechler,  CO-CEO of Reckson  Associates Realty Corp. the sole
general partner of Reckson Operating  Partnership,  L.P.(the "Company"),
certify pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

          1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
              period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
              requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

          2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2002


                          RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
                              By:  Reckson Associates Realty Corp.,
                                     its sole general partner


                                 By     /s/ Scott H. Rechler
                                   ---------------------------
                                    Scott H. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.4





Scottish Power plc


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002


(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)





Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:





1.  I am the Finance Director of Scottish Power plc (the Company).





2.  To the best of my knowledge:





(A)  The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2002 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and





(B)  The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:    August 28, 2002





LOGODavid Nish Finance
Director
Fiscal 2010 Corporate Bonus Plan



  
 EXHIBIT 10.10

 FISCAL 2010 CORPORATE BONUS PLAN 
 This Fiscal 2010 Corporate Bonus Plan applies to all employees of Concur Technologies, Inc. (“Concur”), other than employees compensated under sales commission plans, for fiscal
2010: 
  

	1.	Bonuses are earned under this Fiscal 2010 Corporate Bonus Plan if Concur achieves a target level of fiscal 2010 non-GAAP pre-tax earnings, as determined by the Board of
Directors (the “Corporate Bonus Plan Target”). Bonuses for each employee shall be paid in an amount equal to the percentage of the employee’s base salary selected by the Chief Executive Officer, provided that the bonus
amount for executive officers of Concur subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section 16 Officers”), shall be as follows: 


 

					
	 Section 16 Officer
	  	Target Cash Bonus	 
	 S. Steven Singh, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
	  	 	US$600,000	  
		
	 Rajeev Singh, President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director
	  	 	US$550,000	  
		
	 John F. Adair, Chief Financial Officer
	  	US$	0	  
		
	 Kyle R. Sugamele, Chief Legal Officer
	  	 	US$150,000	  
		
	 Michael Hilton, Executive Vice President of Worldwide Marketing
	  	 	US$193,557	  
		
	 Michael Eberhard, Executive Vice President Worldwide Sales & Business Development
	  	 	Not Eligible	  
		
	 Robert Cavanaugh, Executive Vice President of Client Development
	  	 	Not Eligible	  

  

	2.	The target cash bonus is earned and payable if Concur achieves the Corporate Bonus Plan Target. 


 

	3.	For each 1% that actual fiscal 2010 non-GAAP pre-tax earnings is above the Corporate Bonus Plan Target, the cash bonus of each eligible employee can be increased by
2.5% at the discretion of the Chief Executive Officer (but only at the discretion of the Board of Directors for the Section 16 Officers) up to a maximum of 200% of such employee’s target cash bonus at 100% achievement of the Corporate
Bonus Plan Target. 

  

	4.	If actual fiscal 2010 non-GAAP pre-tax earnings are less than 100% of the Corporate Bonus Plan Target, then cash bonuses under the 2010 Corporate Bonus Plan will be
paid, but reduced on a pro-rata basis for all eligible employees such that actual fiscal 2010 non-GAAP pre-tax earnings equals a minimum level, as determined by the Board of Directors. 


 

	5.	The amount of cash bonus payable to each eligible employee can be reduced at the discretion of the Chief Executive Officer (but only at the discretion of the Board of
Directors for the Section 16 Officers). 

  

	6.	Non-GAAP pre-tax earnings consists of Concur’s GAAP pre-tax earnings for fiscal 2010 adjusted to eliminate share-based compensation expenses, amortization of
acquired intangible assets, and income tax expense. 

  

	7.	Only persons employed by Concur at the end of fiscal 2010 are eligible to receive bonuses under this plan, pro rata to their service during the year.
No. 85-6481.

#### Frazier *v.*Board of Trustees of Northwest Mississippi Regional Medical Center et al.

C. A. *11435th Cir. Certiorari denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Virgil Jay BROWN, Defendant.

No. COA14-1190.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Aug. 18, 2015.

**CASE REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

No Error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Duane Edgar BROOKS.

No. 135P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Duane E. Brooks, Pro Se.

H. Dean Bowman, Special Deputy Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of March 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
August 20, 2009




RE:           Payment of Promissory Note




Maker:        R. David Russell




Lender:       Calais Resources Colorado, Inc.




In consideration of the following payments to R. David Russell the promissory note executed on December 20, 2008 is considered to be paid in full.  In addition the Joint Venture that was completed between DRDMJ, LLC is also considered to be dissolved and is no longer valid.  DRDMJ, LLC will complete the required filings with the Boulder County authorities to show the promissory note paid in full as well as the Joint Venture dissolved.




Promissory Note Payment




The original amount of the note was US$ 405,409 and there was no interest accrued on the note.




R. David Russell has agreed to a full payment of the US$ 405,409 paid in restricted shares for the amount of  5,067,650 shares (priced at US$ 0.08 per share).









Approved and accepted by R. David Russell













Approved and Accepted by David K. Young, President and CEO, Calais Resources











Calais Resources, Inc
 PO Box 653  Nederland, CO  80466-0653
 Phone:  (303)  258 - 3806    Fax:  (303)  258 – 0402
 Website:    Calaisresources.com
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53265-53266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10169 and <greek-i>10170]


Texas Disaster <greek-i>TX-00062

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Texas dated 08/29/2005.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 08/09/2005 through 08/15/2005.

DATES: Effective Date: 08/29/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/28/2005.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/29/2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort 
Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration applications for disaster 
loans may be

[[Page 53266]]

filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:
    Haskell.
Contiguous Counties:
    Texas: Baylor, Jones, King, Knox, Shackelford, Stonewall, 
Throckmorton.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere...................      5.375
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.687
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere...................      6.557
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             4.750
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10169 B 
and for economic injury is 10170 0.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> is Texas.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: August 29, 2005.
Hector V. Barreto,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-17687 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P