alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ronald Reiss, Appellant, v Stella Reiss, Respondent.

[803 NYS2d 633]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dillon, J.), dated May 27, 2004, which denied his motion to vacate the parties’ post-nuptial agreement, and granted that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was to enforce that agreement only to the extent of directing the parties to submit papers on the issue of counsel fees.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as granted that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was to enforce the post-nuptial agreement to the extent of directing the parties to submit papers on the issue of counsel fees is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.

We dismiss the appeal from so much of the order as granted *1074that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was to enforce the post-nuptial agreement only to the extent of directing the parties to submit papers on the issue of counsel fees. That portion of the order did not determine the cross motion and does not affect a substantial right; thus, it is not appealable as of right *(see*CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; *Matter of James,*5 AD3d 487, 488 [2004]), and leave to appeal has not been granted.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion to vacate the parties’ post-nuptial agreement. Viewing the challenged agreement in its entirety, and examining the totality of the circumstances in this case, we find that the agreement is not unconscionable *(see Christian v Christian,*42 NY2d 63 [1977]; *Chambers v McIntyre,*5 AD3d 344 [2004]; *Golfinopoulos v Golfinopoulos,*144 AD2d 537, 538 [1988]; *Juliani v Juliani,*143 AD2d 72, 75 [1988]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTIAN ALBERTO MARTINEZ,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00130

- CR

Appeal from

210 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2011D01837 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

Further, this Court ORDERS Appellant ’ s attorney, pursuant to T EX .R.A PP .P

. 48.4, to

send Appellant a copy of this opinion and this c ourt ’ s judgment, to notify Appellant of his right

to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and to inform Appellant of the applicable

deadlines. See T EX .R.A PP .P . 48.4, 68. Appellant ’ s attorney is further ORDERED t o comply

with all of the requirements of T EX .R.A PP .P. 48.4. This decision shall be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
# CE2004084EN.01047502.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/475 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/475

---

(2004/C 84 E/0550)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1700/03

by Paulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(22 May 2003)

Subject:   Financial corrections

Subject:

In its reply concerning paragraph 2.57 of the 2001 Annual Report of the Court of Auditors (1) the Commission states ‘as part of the follow-up to the 2001 clearance process the Commission services have informed the Portuguese authorities that a financial correction of 2 % of Ifadap expenditure is proposed (EUR 2,8 million)’.

1

Can the Commission explain exactly what prompted it to impose the financial correction of EUR 2,8 million on Ifadap?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(2 July 2003)

(2 July 2003)

The financial correction in question has not yet reached the final accounts clearance procedure, which includes a hearing stage at which the Member State can put forward its arguments.

If a financial correction decision is adopted we shall inform the Honourable Member.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 28.11.2002, p. 58.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 175 (Monday, September 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18035]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Administration on Aging 2005 White House Conference on Aging

AGENCY: Administration on Aging, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of selection of individuals to serve as At-Large 
Delegates to the 2005 White House Conference on Aging (WHCoA).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Policy Committee of the 2005 White House Conference on 
Aging (WHCoA) announces the selection of At-Large Delegates to attend 
the 2005 WHCoA from December 11 through 14, 2005.

DATES: The meeting will be held from Sunday, December 11, 2005 to 
Wednesday, December 14, 2005.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, 
2660 Woodley Road, NW., Washington, DC 20008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Nystrom, Executive Director, 
WHCoA, at (301) 443-2511, or e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4013232f34346e0e393334322f2d003728232f216e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="17447478636339596e646365787a57607f74787639707861">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Older Americans Act 
Amendments of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-501, November 2000), the WHCoA Policy 
Committee announces the selection of At-Large Delegates to the 2005 
WHCoA. Previously, Governors of all 50 States, the U.S. Territories, 
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia, Members 
of the 109th Congress, and the National Congress of American Indians 
selected the majority of delegate representatives to the 2005 WHCoA. 
The Policy Committee has tried to ensure that, with the selection of 
these At-Large Delegates and as mandated by statute, designated 
delegates represent a broad cross section of the U.S. population so 
that concerns and issues of current as well as future seniors receive 
appropriate attention.
    All delegates will vote on resolutions and develop implementation 
strategies to be presented to the President and Congress to help guide 
national aging policies for the next decade and beyond. A complete list 
of all delegates can be found on the WHCoA web site at http://www.whcoa.gov.

    Dated: September 7, 2005.
Edwin L. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Programs.
[FR Doc. 05-18035 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

             EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Principal Executive Officer

      To my knowledge: the amended annual report on Form 20-F for the period
ended May 31, 2003, containing financial statements for the period then ended,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of
1934; and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Calais
Resources, Inc. for the periods presented.

July 27, 2004

/s/ Thomas S. Hendricks
--------------------------------------------
Thomas S. Hendricks, Chief Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer

      To my knowledge: the amended annual report on Form 20-F for the period
ended May 31, 2003, containing financial statements for the period then ended,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of
1934; and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Calais
Resources, Inc. for the periods presented.

July 27, 2004

/s/ Matthew C. Witt
----------------------------------------
Matthew C. Witt, Chief Financial Officer
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001141

30-MAR-2016

08:10 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.30

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

Atlanta, Georgia
                                                              Date: March 6,2003

PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: USD $50,000,00

INTEREST RATE: 10% p.a.

DUE DATE: August 31, 2003

FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to FIDRA
HOLDINGS LTD. or order, the sum of FIFTY THOUSAND US DOLLARS (USD $50,000.00) on
August 31" 2003, together with the interest at the rate of Ten per cent (10%)
per annum on the principal amount outstanding from time to time, calculated from
the date hereof and payable on the last day of each month from and after March
31st, 2003, up until maturity and after maturity until PAYMENT, PROVIDED that
the Promissor may, in each year, calculated from the date hereof, pay by way of
accelerated repayment of principal, such amount or amounts when aggregated
together, total up to, but not more than one quarter (1/4) of the principal
outstanding hereunder at any time, without notice or bonus prior to maturity
date.

Notice of Presentment, Protest and Dishonor are hereby waived.

/s/ Thomas P. Tanis, Jr.
------------------------

SYNDICATED FOOD SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC.,
# CE2004078EN.01075201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/752 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/752

---

(2004/C 78 E/0799)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2706/03

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 September 2003)

Subject:   Daphne Programme

Subject:

The Daphne Programme, which was set up to stop violence against women and children, received funding of EUR 20 million in the period 2000-2003. Can the Commission list the non-governmental organisations, public bodies and private establishments to which that funding was awarded? Has the Commission launched an evaluation of the results of the programme?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(16 October 2003)

(16 October 2003)

During the period 2000-2003 the Daphne programme has provided financing totalling EUR 18 271 522 for 145 projects by organisations or public authorities.

A complete list of projects financed has been sent direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.

An evaluation of the results and of their initial impact is made annually and forms the basis of a summary report. A mid-term evaluation of the Daphne programme itself has been made and the report on that evaluation, together with the annual evaluation reports, is available on the programme's internet site: HtmlResAnchor (http://europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/funding/daphne/funding_daphne_en.htm).

A final evaluation of the Daphne programme is being made. The evaluation report should be available at the beginning of 2004 and will be sent to Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 9(3) of Decision No 293/2000/E (1) establishing the Daphne programme.

1

---

(1)  European Parliament and Council Decision No 293/2000/EC of 24 January 2000 adopting a programme of Community action (the Daphne programme) (2000 to 2003) on preventive measures to fight violence against children, young persons and women, OJ L 34, 9.2.2000.

1

---
EXHIBIT 3.17


                               State of Delaware

                        Office of the Secretary of State
                        --------------------------------

I, EDWARD J. FREEL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY OF "MBI NO. 1, LLC", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE THIRTIETH DAY
OF DECEMBER, A.D. 1997, AT 9 O'CLOCK A.M.





                                           /s/ Edward J. Freel
                                           -------------------------
                                           Edward J. Freel, Secretary of State
[SEAL] Secretary's Office
       1793 Delaware 1855


                                            AUTHENTICATION:  8913767

                                                      DATE:  02-10-98
STATE OF DELAWARE
SECRETARY OF STATE
DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
FILED 09:00 AM 12/30/1997
971453132-2840049

<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION


                                       OF

                                 MBI No. 1, LLC


        FIRST:  The name of the limited liability company (the "Company") is MBI
No. 1, LLC.

        SECOND: The registered office of the Company is 15 East North Street, in
the City of Dover, Kent County, State of Delaware 19901.  The name of its
registered agent at that address is United Corporate Services, Inc.

        IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF,  I have signed my name to this Certificate of
Formation this 30th day of December, 1997.



                                           /s/ Orlando Figueroa
                                           ---------------------
                                           Orlando Figueroa
                                           Authorized Person
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TAJHON WILSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2024-0194

June 5, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Susan St. John, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
S. 602

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,

the third day of January, two thousand and eight

An Act

To develop the next generation of parental control technology.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Safe Viewing Act of 2007’’.

SEC. 2. EXAMINATION OF ADVANCED BLOCKING TECHNOLOGIES AND

EXISTING PARENTAL EMPOWERMENT TOOLS.

(a) INQUIRY REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date

of enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission

shall initiate a notice of inquiry to consider measures to examine—

(1) the existence and availability of advanced blocking technologies that are compatible with various communications

devices or platforms;

(2) methods of encouraging the development, deployment,

and use of such technology by parents that do not affect the

packaging or pricing of a content provider’s offering; and

(3) the existence, availability, and use of parental empowerment tools and initiatives already in the market.

(b) CONTENT OF PROCEEDING.—In conducting the inquiry

required under subsection (a), the Commission shall consider

advanced blocking technologies that—

(1) may be appropriate across a wide variety of distribution

platforms, including wired, wireless, and Internet platforms;

(2) may be appropriate across a wide variety of devices

capable of transmitting or receiving video or audio programming, including television sets, DVD players, VCRs, cable set

top boxes, satellite receivers, and wireless devices;

(3) can filter language based upon information in closed

captioning;

(4) operate independently of ratings pre-assigned by the

creator of such video or audio programming; and

(5) may be effective in enhancing the ability of a parent

to protect his or her child from indecent or objectionable

programming, as determined by such parent.

(c) REPORTING.—Not later than 270 days after the enactment

of this Act, the Commission shall issue a report to Congress

detailing any findings resulting from the inquiry required under

subsection (a).

(d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘advanced blocking

technologies’’ means technologies that can improve or enhance the

ability of a parent to protect his or her child from any indecent

or objectionable video or audio programming, as determined by
S. 602—2

such parent, that is transmitted through the use of wire, wireless,

or radio communication.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
SMITHFIELD HOUSING AUTHORITY v. Philip CREECH.

No. 114P07-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Philip Creech, Pro Se.

Robert Spence, Jr., Smithfield, for Smithfield Housing Authority.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th day of August 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Johnston County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 899/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 899/2014 of 18 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 899/2014                     

# of 18 August 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1
<CURRENCY>                       US DOLLARS
       

<S>                                                 <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                            5,953,505
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,591,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                        983,154
<INVENTORY>                                       8,319,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 26,489,983
<PP&E>                                           26,261,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7,126,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   77,396,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12,045,965
<BONDS>                                          98,445,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            54,067,681
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              2,490
<OTHER-SE>                                      (89,932,489)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     77,396,571
<SALES>                                          28,614,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 28,614,667
<CGS>                                            13,468,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13,468,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 66,680,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14,501,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (63,419,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (63,419,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (63,419,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        




</TABLE>