alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sixth Amendment to Standard Industrial/Commercial Multi-Tenant Lease-Net



  
 Exhibit 10.1

 SIXTH AMENDMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 
 Nancy Ridge Technology Center, L.P., a California limited partnership (“Lessor”), and Trius Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“Lessee”), hereby amend the Lease dated
September 7, 2004 for Suites #101, 104, 105 & 106 at 6310 Nancy Ridge Drive, San Diego, CA 92121 (“Premises”): 
  

	1.	Lease Term: The Lease Term is hereby extended. The Expiration Date shall be June 30, 2012 instead of December 31, 2010.


  

	2.	Consecutive Options to Extend: Lessee shall have two consecutive options. The first shall be the right to extend the Lease Term for six (6) months
(to December 31, 2012), which Lessee may exercise by delivering Notice to Lessor of Lessee’s exercise of said option on or before January 16, 2012. This option shall expire if not exercised by lessee on or before January 16,
2012. 

 The second shall be the right to extend the Lease Term for an additional twelve (12) months (to
December 31, 2013), which Lessee may exercise by delivering Notice to Lessor or Lessee’s exercise of said option on or before June 29, 2013. This option shall expire if not exercised by Lessee on or before June 29, 2013, or if
the first Option to Extend described above is not exercised on or before January 16, 2012. 
 Lessee shall have no options
other than the ones granted herein. 
  

	3.	Confidentiality: The terms of the Lease are confidential. No party to the Lease, nor any broker, shall disclose any of the terms of the lease to any other
party. 

  

	4.	No Lessor Default: Lessor is not currently in Default of any of the terms or conditions of the Lease. 


 

	5.	Authority to Execute: Each person executing this Amendment represents and warrants to all parties that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver
this Amendment on behalf of that party. 

 All other terms and conditions of the original Lease shall remain in full force and
effect. 
  
  
 In witness hereof, the parties have caused these present to be executed as of the day and the year first above written. 
  

			
	Lessor:  	 	 Nancy Ridge Technology Center, L.P.,
 a California Limited Partnership

		
	By:	 	 Nancy Ridge Technology Center, L.L.C.,
 a California Limited Liability Company, General Partner

		
	By:	 	/s/ Chris Loughridge
		 	Chris Loughridge, its Manager
		
	Date:	 	October 18, 2010
		
	Lessee:	 	 Trius Therapeutics, Inc.,

a Delaware Corporation

		
	By:	 	/s/ John P. Schmid
		 	John P. Schmid
		
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
		
	Date:	 	October 1, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Chinawe.com Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Man Keung Alan Wai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



|/s/ Man Keung Alan Wai  | 
|----------------------- | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|March 29, 2019          | 
|                        | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be retained
by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1842
WILLIAM C. POSEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-663) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William C. Posey, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lori Fuller, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995). We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Posey v. North Carolina , No. CA-95-663 (M.D.N.C. May 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# **Exhibit 32.2**

#  

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

#  

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,the Chief Financial Officer of Western Sizzlin Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2009 and the financial statements contained therein, fully comply with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q and thefinancial statements thereto fairly present, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 31,2009, and the period then ended.

 
| /s/ Robyn B. Mabe |   | Date: May 6, 2009 |
|-------------------|--------|------------------------|

 

----
# C_2023121EN.01001101.xml

| 3.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/11

---

Action brought on 16 February 2023 — Tertianum v EUIPO — DPF (TERTIANUM)

(Case T-73/23)

(2023/C 121/15)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Tertianum AG (Dübendorf, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Fröhlich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DPF AG (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark TERTIANUM — International registration designating the European Union No 1 305 367

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 November 2022 in Case R 1706/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) read in conjunction with Article 8(2)(a)(iii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 47(2) and (3) read in conjunction with Article 8(2)(a)(iii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. James P. BRILL.

No. 299P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Robert W. Ewing, Clemmons, for Brill.

John P. Scherer, II, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 24th day of June 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."

*341Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of June 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
STATE v. Edward Jefferson AUSTIN.

No. 316P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of July 2008 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of December 2008."
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              |
|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|             |                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. |

| /s/ Jeffrey H. Strasberg |                                                          |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                    | Jeffrey H. Strasberg                                          |   |
| Title:         | Chief Executive and Financial Officer                    |   |
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |   |
|                     |                                                          |   |
| Date:               | August 12, 2011                                               |   |

----
#### Patrick Costigan et al., Appellants, v Charles J. Bleifeld, Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 617]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated November 25, 2002, which denied that branch of their motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3404 to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to make the motion to restore until more than one *872year after the action had been marked off the trial calendar. Also, in light of the lapse of some 13 years between the date of the alleged malpractice and the time the motion under review was made, the Supreme Court could properly infer that the defendant had been prejudiced *(see Collins v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*266 AD2d 178 [1999]; *Carter v City of New York,*231 AD2d 485 [1996]). Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion to restore *(see Cobos v Phieffer,*8 AD3d 424 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 695/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 695/2014 of 23 June 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 695/2014                     

# of 23 June 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 June 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# C_2023296EN.01001302.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Laudamotion GmbH

(Case C-334/23, (1) flightright)

(Air transport - Compensation to air passengers in the event of cancellation of flights - Extraordinary circumstances - Covid-19 pandemic - Cancellation of numerous flights - Profitability - Economic reasons - Protection of the health of crew members - No administrative prohibition)

(2023/C 296/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: flightright GmbH

Respondent: Laudamotion GmbH

Operative part of the order

Case C-334/23 is removed from the Register of the Court.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 26.5.2023.

---
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/1174Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/1174 of 14 July 2015 amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national            central banks, as regards the external auditor of Banka Slovenije         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/1174                     

# of 14 July 2015

# amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national central banks, as regards the external auditor                        of Banka Slovenije                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Protocol No 4 on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank annexed                           to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular to Article 27.1                           thereof,                        

Having regard to Recommendation of the European Central Bank of 10 June 2015 to the Council of the European Union on the external                           auditors of Banka Slovenije (ECB/2015/23)(1),                        

Whereas:

(1)The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and of the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the                              euro are to be audited by independent external auditors recommended by the Governing Council of the ECB and approved by the                              Council.

(2)The mandate of the current external auditor of Banka Slovenije, Deloitte revizija d.o.o., expired after the audit for the                              financial year 2014. It is therefore necessary to appoint a new external auditor from the financial year 2015.

(3)Banka Slovenije has selected Ernst & Young d.o.o. as its external auditor for the financial years 2015 to 2017.

(4)The Governing Council of the ECB recommended that Ernst & Young d.o.o. be appointed as the external auditor of Banka Slovenije                              for the financial years 2015 to 2017.

(5)Following the recommendation of the Governing Council of the ECB, Council Decision 1999/70/EC(2) should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Article 1(13) of Decision 1999/70/EC is replaced by the following:

## ‘13.Ernst & Young d.o.o. is hereby approved as the external auditor of Banka Slovenije for the financial years 2015 to 2017.’.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its notification.

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision is addressed to the European Central Bank.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

P. Gramegna                            

1

OJ C 201, 18.6.2015, p. 1.                           

2

Council Decision 1999/70/EC of 25 January 1999 concerning the external auditors of the national central banks (OJ L 22, 29.1.1999, p. 69).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce W. Duncan,Chief Executive Officer of Equity Residential, general partner of ERPOP,certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.

 

 
| /s/                                            | Bruce W. Duncan |   |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------|
| Bruce W. Duncan                                |
| Chief Executive Officer  of Equity Residential |
| May 7, 2004                               |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

*Time And Date:*                     Thursday, September 15, 2005, 10 a.m. (Open Portion) 10:15 a.m. (Closed Portion).                

*Place:*                     Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.                

*Status:*                     Meeting Open to the Public from 10 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. Closed portion will commence at 10:15 a.m. (approx.).                

*Matters To Be Considered:*

1. President's Report.

2. Approval of July 28, 2005 Minutes (Open Portion).

*Further Matters To Be Considered:*                     (Closed to the Public 10:15 a.m.)                

1. Proposed FY2007 Budget.

2. Finance Project—Russia.

3. Finance Project—Asia.

4. Finance Project—Eastern Europe and Turkey.

5. Finance Project—Mexico.

6. Approval of July 28, 2005 Minutes (Closed Portion).

7. Pending Major Projects.

8. Reports.

*Contact Person For Information:*                     Information on the meeting may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438.                

Dated: September 1, 2005.

Connie M. Downs,

Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

[FR Doc. 05-17724 Filed 9-1-05; 2:13 pm]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
STATE v. SLADE.

No. COA08-274.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Guilford (06CRS100231).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 99.4
                                                                    ------------



In connection with the Annual Report of Compton Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") to
which this certificate is an exhibit, I, Norman G. Knecht, Vice President,
Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  May 9, 2003                                /s/ Norman G. Knecht
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Norman G. Knecht
                                                  Vice President, Finance
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Compton Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Compton
Petroleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.