alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023104EN.01004102.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/41

---

Action brought on 7 February 2023 — W.B. Studio v EUIPO — E.Land Italy (BELFE)

(Case T-50/23)

(2023/C 104/62)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. (Milano, Italy) (represented by: V. Piccarreta and G. Romanelli, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: E.Land Italy Srl (Milano, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark BELFE — European Union trade mark No 139 501

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 November 2022 in Case R 869/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Partially annul the contested decision to the extent it upheld the decision of the Cancellation Division and, consequently, declare the revocation of the trade mark at issue; |
| --- | --- |

—

Partially annul the contested decision to the extent it upheld the decision of the Cancellation Division and, consequently, declare the revocation of the trade mark at issue;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of the present proceedings, including the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the present proceedings, including the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of article 58(1)(a) in conjunction with article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of article 58(1)(a) in conjunction with article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of article 19 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of article 19 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.

---
WOMACK NEWSPAPERS v. KITTY HAWK.

No. 82PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Hugh Stevens, Michael J. Tadych, Raleigh, for Womack Newspapers.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of February 2007 by Defendants (Harris, et al.) to Withdraw Petition:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of March 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ELECTROSCOPE, INC. BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE STATEMENTS OF
OPERATION AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         882,869
<SECURITIES>                                 1,925,857
<RECEIVABLES>                                  336,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    709,286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,733,303
<PP&E>                                         712,853
<DEPRECIATION>                               (525,894)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,055,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          444,117
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,941,317
<OTHER-SE>                                     290,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,055,155
<SALES>                                      1,491,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,491,295
<CGS>                                          899,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,999,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (90,707)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,317,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,317,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,317,344)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                 Certification

           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                   (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                  Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Western Wireless Corporation, a Washington corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 14, 2003

                                                   /s/ M. Wayne Wisehart
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   M. Wayne Wisehart
                                                   Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer



   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
# CE2004078EN.01072101.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/721 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/721

---

(2004/C 78 E/0771)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1667/03

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(19 May 2003)

Subject:   VAT on postal services

Subject:

The Commission's Communication on a ‘Strategy To Improve the Operation of the VAT system’ (1), issued in June 2000, indicated the Commission's intention, ‘inter alia’, to come forward with proposals to ensure the application of VAT to postal services. Could the Commission indicate what, if any, formal responses were received by it from the Irish Government regarding this particular proposal in the three-year period since the issuing of this Communication and its proposal for a draft Directive issued on 6 May 2003?

1

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(19 June 2003)

(19 June 2003)

No formal responses were received by the Commission from the Irish Government regarding the application of VAT to postal services as set out in its Communication A strategy to improve the operation of the VAT system within the context of the internal market' (2).

2

---

(1)  COM(2000) 348 final.

1

(2)  COM(2000) 348 final.

2

---
STATE v. GLADDEN.

No. COA08-726.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Rowan (05CRS53978, 05CRS53979, 05CRS53980, 06CRS5010).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6343

RONALD DENNIS WILLIAMS, Petitioner

- Appellant,

v. SHANTICIA HAWKINS, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:20

- hc

- 02160

- BO )

Submitted : July 21, 2022 Decided: July 26, 2022

Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ronald Dennis Williams , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6343 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/26/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Ronald Dennis Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order di smissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) (explaining that § 2254 petition s are subject to one

- year statute of limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U. S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constituti onal right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denia l of a constitutional right. Gonzalez , 565
U.S. at 140

- 41 (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6343 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/26/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 578/2014Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 578/2014 of 28 May 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive            measures in view of the situation in Syria         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 578/2014                     

# of 28 May 2014

# implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation                           in Syria(1), and in particular Article 32(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 18 January 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.

(2)Two persons and one entity should no longer be kept on the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures in                              Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.

(3)The information relating to certain persons and entities listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 should be updated.

(4)Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 May 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

E. Venizelos                            

## ANNEXU.K.

The persons and entities listed below, as well as the related entries, are hereby deleted from the list set out in Annex II                              to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012:                           

### A.**Persons**U.K.

No 14. Asif Shawkat

No 178. Sulieman Maarouf

### B.**Entities**U.K.

No 45. Syria International Islamic Bank.

The entries concerning the persons listed below, as set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, are replaced by the                              following entries.                           

1

OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.
Exhibit










Amendment to Employment Agreement
(Tom Wittenschlaeger)




This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of May 2, 2016, by and between Fox Factory Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Tom Wittenschlaeger, an individual (“Executive”), amends that certain Employment Agreement dated as of January 26, 2015 by and between the Company and Executive (the “Original Agreement”) and shall be effective immediately (the “Effective Date”). All terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Original Agreement.
RECITALS


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend certain provisions of the Original Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises and the respective mutual agreements contained herein, the parties to this Amendment agree as follows:
Section 1.     Amendments.
(a)    The last sentence of Section (3)(a) of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
“The Base Salary will be reviewed on an annual basis by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee") and may be increased (or decreased as part of substantially similar reductions applicable to all executives) from time to time, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.”
(b)    The third sentence Section 3(b) of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“The term “Executive’s Base Salary” means Executive’s actual Base Salary, exclusive of any other compensation received by Executive regardless of form, in effect as of the date of the Performance Bonus is calculated.”
Section 2.    Effect on Original Agreement.  On and after the Effective Date, each reference in the Original Agreement to “this letter”, “hereunder”, “hereof”, “herein” or words of similar import shall mean and be a reference to the Original Agreement as amended hereby.  Except as specifically modified by the terms of this Amendment, all of the terms, provisions, covenants, warranties and agreements contained in the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified.
Section 3.    Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be construed under and shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.  
Section 4.    Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Amendment and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first above written.













	
	
	THE  COMPANY
Fox Factory Holding Corp.,
  a Delaware corporation

	





  By: /s/ Larry Enterline
  Name: Larry Enterline
  Title:  Chief Executive Officer

	 

	THE EXECUTIVE
  

	



  /s/ Tom Wittenschlaeger
  Tom Wittenschlaeger
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

ALPHARETTA, GEORGIA                                     DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2002

PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: US $20,000.00

INTEREST RATE: 10% per annum

DUE DATE: DECEMBER 31, 2002

FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned, Syndicated Food Services International
Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Borrower") promises to pay to the order of
FIDRA HOLDINGS LTD., OR ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS (THE "HOLDER"), the sum of
TWENTY THOUSAND US DOLLARS (USD $20,000.00) (The Principal) on December 31, 2002
(The "Maturity Date"), together with the interest at the rate of Ten per cent
(10%) per annum on the principal amount outstanding from time to time until paid
in full. All sums due hereunder shall be paid by the Borrower to the holder of
this Note at such address as designated by the holder of this Note to the
Borrower.

In the event a default shall be made in payment of any installment of interest
or principal or other charges when due all such amounts shall bear interest at a
default rate of interest from the date of default at the rate of 12% per annum
and shall be immediately due and payable. In the event of any default hereunder
the holders shall be entitled to all remedies at law or in equity and shall be
entitled to all costs and expenses incurred by its, including attorneys fees.

This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of New York, without regard to conflict of law principles. Any dispute
with respect to the interpretation of this Note or the rights and obligations of
the parties shall be exclusively brought in a proceeding in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York or if such court lacks
subject matter jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of the State of New York,
County of New York. Each of the holder and the Borrower waives the right to
context the jurisdiction or venue of either of such courts or to claim it is an
inconvenient forum.

Neither the Borrower or the holder may claim the right to have a jury trial and
the Borrower shall have no right of offset or counterclaim.

The Borrower expressly waives the right to notice of any default or the right to
presentment or demand.

The proceeds of this Note shall be used to fund accounting expenses associated
with the audit of the company's books and records for the calendar year ended
December 31, 2001 and quarterly reviews for the calendar year ending December
31, 2002.

SYNDICATED FOOD SERVICE INTERNATIONAL INC.,

By: /s/ Thomas P. Tanis Jr.
    ------------------------
    THOMAS P. TANIS, JR.
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                             /s/ RONALD F. SATTLER
                             -----------------------------
                               RONALD F. SATTLER
                     Notary Public Gwinnett County, Georgia
                       My Commision Expires June 27, 2004
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony Eugene WARE.

No. 129P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Jayne Stowers, for Ware.

David Adinolfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 656 S.E.2d 662.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of March 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

Office of Public Health Emergency Preparedness (OPHEP), HHS.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects the notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 29, 2005, (70 FR 51065), entitled “Federal Guidelines for Requesting, Stockpiling, Distributing Potassium Iodide (KI) From the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS)'.                     

                        We inadvertently omitted the                         **DATES**                         section of the notice to inform the public of how long we will be receiving comments.                     

                        We are adding the                         **DATES**                         section to read as follows:                     

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before November 1, 2005. 

Robert G. Claypool, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Public, Health Emergency Preparedness.

[FR Doc. 05-17556 Filed 9-1-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150-37-P
EXHIBIT 31.1(a)
 
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 Pursuant to Section 302
 Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Jeffry N. Quinn, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Solutia Inc.; and
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 
 
 Dated: April 30, 2012
 
 /s/ Jeffry N. Quinn
 Jeffry N. Quinn
 President, Chief Executive Officer
 and Chairman of the Board
Loan
Agreement


    


    Party A
(Borrower) :
Harbin Humankind Biology Technology Co., Limited

     

    Party B
(Lender)
: Xin Sun

     

    ID Number
: 23010219660523161X

     

    On the
basis of equality, voluntariness and negotiation, both Party A and Party B enter
into this agreement about the loan.

    
       

      I. Party
B loans RMB 1,110,000 to Party A and provides the loan before October 9,
2008.

    

    II.
Interest: No Interest.

    III. Life
of Loan: No fixed terms of repayment.

    IV. Date
and Method of Payments: Party A will make the repayments in cash according to
the operation of its company.

    V. Settlements
of Diputes: apply for arbitration in local arbitration committee.

    VI. This
contract is taken into effect since signing date. This contract is executed in
two copies with the same legal effect. Both parties hold one copy
respectively.

     

    
      
        
          
            
              	
                      Party
      A (Seal) :

                    	
                      Party
      B:

                    
	
                      Harbin
      Humankind Biology

                    	 
      
	
                      Technology
      Co. Limited

                    	
                      /s/
      Xin Sun

                    
	 	 
	
                      Date:

                    	
                      Date:
      October 9,
2008
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to March 22, 2022)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-21-562 In re Interest of A’Nessty C. et al.

A-21-567 State v. Smith

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.