alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3681 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3681

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Joseph A. 
                      Ryan Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 2 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Joseph A. 
                      Ryan Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSEPH A. RYAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Joseph A. Ryan Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph A. 
Ryan Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. JONES.

No. COA07-420.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 17, 2008.

Certification Date July 7, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CRS225342, 05CRS225343).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                     Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee (IARPC).                

*Date and Time:*                     Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 2-3:30 p.m.                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, Room 1235, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Closed. The meeting is closed to the public because future fiscal year budgets will be discussed.                

*Contact Person:*                     Charles E. Myers, Office of Polar Programs, Room 755, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone : (703) 292-8029.                

*Purpose of Committee:*                     The Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee was established by Public Law 98-373, the Arctic Research and Policy Act, to help set priorities for future arctic research, assist in the development of national arctic research policy, prepare a multi-agency Plan for arctic research, and simplify coordination of arctic research.                

*Proposed Meeting Agenda Items:*

1. U.S. Arctic Policy Review.

2. International Polar Year (IPY) Research Activities.

3. Discussion of Budget for IPY Activities.

4. Report of the Arctic Research Commission.

Charles E. Myers,

Head, Interagency Arctic Staff, Office of Polar Programs.

[FR Doc. 05-1786  Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
JONES v. DALTON.

No. COA07-553.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from New Hanover (05CVS2157).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kirk B. Davis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Symphonix Devices, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2002 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Symphonix Devices, Inc.





By:

/s/    KIRK B.
DAVISName: Kirk B. Davis Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 13, 2002








I, Terence J. Griffin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Symphonix Devices, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Symphonix Devices, Inc.





By:

/s/    TERENCE J.
GRIFFINName: Terence J. Griffin Title: Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 13, 2002
** **

**Exhibit32.1**

#### CERTIFICATIONSOF PERIODIC REPORT

I, John R. Serino,President and Chief Executive Officer of Encision Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

·                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of our for the quarterly period ended September30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

·                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of our operations.

Dated:    November 13, 2006
|   | /s/ John R. Serino           |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | John R. Serino               |
|   | Principal  Executive Officer |

 

I, Marcia McHaffie,Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of Encision Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

·                  the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-QSB of our for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

·                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of our.

Dated:    November 13, 2006
|   | /s/ Marcia McHaffie                                                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Marcia McHaffie                                                           |
|   | Controller,  Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-37207, 333-64135 and 333-54440 of CNA Surety Corporation and subsidiaries on
Forms S-8, filed on October 3, 1997, September 24, 1998, and January 26, 2001,
respectively, of our report dated February 10, 2003, appearing in and
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CNA Surety
Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 10, 2003
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 965/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 965/2014 of 11 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 965/2014                     

# of 11 September 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 September 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 175 (Monday, September 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17956]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 6, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. German American Bancorp, Jasper, Indiana; to acquire 9.8 percent 
of the voting shares of Eclipse Bank, Inc., Louisville, Kentucky (in 
organization).
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc., Bloomington, Minnesota; to become 
a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Bridgewater Bank, Bloomington, Minnesota, a de novo bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 6, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-17956 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
|   |         |                                        |         | Jurisdiction |
|--------|--------------|---------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------|
| 1.     |         | AboveNet      Communications, Inc.          |         | Delaware     |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 2.     |         | AboveNet      International, Inc.           |         | Delaware     |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 3.     |         | AboveNet      Canada, Inc.                  |         | Canada       |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 4.     |         | AboveNet      of VA, LLC                    |         | Virginia     |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 5.     |         | AboveNet      of Utah, LLC                  |         | Delaware     |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 6.     |         | MFN      Japan KK                           |         | Japan        |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 7.     |         | AboveNet      Communications Europe Limited |         | U.K.         |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 8.     |         | MFN      Europe Finance, Inc.               |         | Delaware     |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 9.     |         | MFN      International LLC                  |         | Delaware     |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 10.    |         | MFN      Europe Limited                     |         | U.K.         |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 11.    |         | AboveNet      Communications UK Ltd.        |         | U.K.         |
|   |         |                                        |         |         |
| 12.    |    | AN      Communications, Inc.                |    | Taiwan       |

----
STATE v. ELLIOTT.

No. COA07-626.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 2, 2008.

Certification Date September 22, 2008.

Appeal from Durham (05CRS48754).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
IN RE J.L.A.

No. COA08-220.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 19, 2008.

Certification Date September 8, 2008.

Appeal from Yadkin (06J71).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Dion Darrell DAVIS v. The STATE of North Carolina, The County of Cumberland.

No. 390P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 28, 2008.

Dion D. Davis, Pro Se.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 26th day of August 2008 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cumberland County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 28th day of August 2008."
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

p0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148746

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Pl aintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148746

COA: 319179

Oakland CC: 2012

- 243435

- FC

WILLIAM EARL CLEMONS III,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2023304EN.01001101.xml

| 28.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 13 June 2023 — SR, RB v Lietuvos Respublika

(Case C-374/23, Adoreikė (1))

(2023/C 304/14)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: SR, RB

Defendant: Lietuvos Respublika

Questions referred

| 1. | Are the values of democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights and justice, enshrined in Article 2 TEU, and the provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, to be interpreted as conferring on the legislative and executive powers of the Member States the unrestricted and exclusive discretion to set, by means of national legislation, the remuneration of judges at a rate that depends solely on the will of the legislative and executive powers? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are the values of democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights and justice, enshrined in Article 2 TEU, and the provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, to be interpreted as conferring on the legislative and executive powers of the Member States the unrestricted and exclusive discretion to set, by means of national legislation, the remuneration of judges at a rate that depends solely on the will of the legislative and executive powers?

| 2. | Are the provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, as well as those of Article 47 of the Charter [of Fundamental Rights of the European Union], which covers, inter alia, the independence of the judiciary, to be interpreted as permitting the Member States to introduce, by means of national legislation, rules which set the remuneration of judges below the remuneration or fees set by the State in respect of members of other legal professions? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are the provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, as well as those of Article 47 of the Charter [of Fundamental Rights of the European Union], which covers, inter alia, the independence of the judiciary, to be interpreted as permitting the Member States to introduce, by means of national legislation, rules which set the remuneration of judges below the remuneration or fees set by the State in respect of members of other legal professions?

---

(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Thomas Howard DUNCAN.

No. 91A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Lisa M. Miles, for Duncan.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 656 S.E.2d 597.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 21st day of February 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by State of NC on the 11th day of March 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and, the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Accordingly, the new brief of the State of NC shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
STATE of North Carolina v. Ernest DRAYTON, Jr.

No. 207P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Matthew Wunsche, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Drayton.

*765Yvonne Ricei, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of May 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."