alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2014 of 30 June 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 499/96 as regards            new Union tariff quotas for certain fish and fishery products originating in Iceland         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2014                     

# of 30 June 2014

# amending Council Regulation (EC) No 499/96 as regards new Union tariff quotas for certain fish and fishery products originating                        in Iceland                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 499/96 of 19 March 1996 opening and providing for the administration of tariff                           quotas of the Union for certain fish and fishery products originating in Iceland(1), and in particular Article 5(1)(b) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)By Council Decision 2014/343/EU(2), the signing and the provisional application of an Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community                              and Iceland consequent to the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union have been approved.

(2)The Additional Protocol provides for two new tariff quotas for release for free circulation in the European Union of frozen                              Norway lobsters and of fresh or chilled fillets of redfish originating in Iceland.

(3)It is necessary to amend Regulation (EC) No 499/96 in order to implement the new tariff quotas.

(4)The new tariff quotas should apply for a period of 12 months. In accordance with Decision 2014/343/EU, they are to apply from                              the day of the provisional application of the Additional Protocol. This Regulation should therefore apply from the same date.

(5)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following rows are added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 499/96:

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

It shall apply from 1 August 2014.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 75, 23.3.1996, p. 8.                           

2

OJ L 170, 11.6.2014, p. 3.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

# **OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION**

# ** **

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 63 – 1350, the President (PrincipalExecutive Officer) and Chief Executive Officer of Western Sizzlin Corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2004 and the financial statements contained therein, fully complywith the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q and the financialstatements thereto fairly present, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| November 15, 2004 |                |
|-------------------|---------------------|
|              |                |
|              | /s/ James C. Verney |

 

----
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 31, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00391-CV 

CHARLES SALLIE, Appellant 

V. 

MICHELE JACKSON, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-22751 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By 

postcard dated March 26, 2015, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed 

appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated March 26, 2015, we 

notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant 

to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so 

might result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated May 1, 2015, we informed appellant the 

clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements 

to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been found to be 
 –2– 

entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 

result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the 

filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b),(c). 

150391F.P05 

 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CHARLES SALLIE, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00391-CV V. 

MICHELE JACKSON, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-22751. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Whitehill 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee MICHELE JACKSON recover her costs of this appeal 

from appellant CHARLES SALLIE. 

Judgment entered July 31, 2015.
Exhibit 10.2 Notice of Grant RSU


		
			April 29, 2016
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			«Full_Name»
		

		
			«Address_1»
		

		
			«Address_2»
		

		
			«CityState»
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Dear «First_Name»,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the company’s AVX Corporation 2014 Restricted Stock Unit Plan, you have been granted a Restricted Stock Unit/Stock Settled for «RSU» units of stock and a Performance Stock Unit/Stock Settled for «RSU» units of stock as outlined below.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Granted To:«Full_Name»
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Grant Type:Restricted Stock Unit/Stock Settled
		

		
			Grant Date:April 29, 2016
		

		
			Granted:«RSU»
		

		
			Vesting Schedule:33+% per year for 3 years
		

		
			«RSU_Vestin_1» on 04/29/2017
		

		
			«RSU_Vesting_23» on 04/29/2018
		

		
			«RSU_Vesting_23» on 04/29/2019
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Grant Type:Performance Stock Unit/Stock Settled
		

		
			Grant Date:April 29, 2016
		

		
			Original Target Granted:«RSU»
		

		
			Potential Payout Range:0% to 100%
		

		
			Potential Attained Shares:0 to «RSU»
		

		
			Vesting Schedule:100% after one year
		

		
			Maximum vest - «PSU_Vesting» on 04/29/2017
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
# C_2023286EN.01002201.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Katowice — Wschód w Katowicach (Poland) lodged on 10 May 2023 — M. J. v C. J.

(Case C-302/23, Piekiewicz (1))

(2023/C 286/27)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy Katowice — Wschód w Katowicach

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: M. J.

Defendant: C. J.

Question referred

Must Article 2(1) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC, (2) in conjunction with Article 25(1) and (2) thereof, and recitals 12, 13, 18, 21, 22 and 49 thereof, be interpreted as meaning that a court of a Member State is obliged to accept a procedural document lodged with that court and signed with an electronic signature, as referred to in Article 3(10) of the regulation, where the national law of the Member State does not provide for any possibility of lodging procedural documents with the court by means of an electronic signature other than through an ICT system?

---

(1)  This case has been given a fictitious name which does not correspond to the real name of either of the parties to the proceedings.

(2)  OJ 2014 L 257, p .73.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Hymes, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 843]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered February 13, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree and two counts of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of nine years to life, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the persistent violent felony offender adjudication and sentence, and remanding for further sentencing proceedings in accordance with CPL article 400, and otherwise affirmed.

The record establishes that defendant was adjudicated as a persistent violent felony offender and that he received a sentence that would only be lawful upon such an adjudication. However, by failing to specify the subdivision of Penal Law § 265.02 applicable to defendant’s prior conviction of attempted criminal possession of a weapon, the People’s information failed to establish that this conviction qualified as a violent felony *(see*Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [d]). Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
STATE v. SINK.

No. COA07-1407.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (05CRS60139, 05CRS60140).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Western Wireless Corporation, a Washington corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter
         ended June 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies
         with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A
         fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
         results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 11, 2003

                                        By: /s/ M. WAYNE WISEHART
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            M. Wayne Wisehart
                                            Executive Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
STATE v. Arthur O. ARMSTRONG.

No. 488P06-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Patricia A. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of May 2007 by Defendant for judgment in favor of defendant, dropping all charges and dismissing the case, in accordance to NC Rules of Appellate Procedure:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of December 2007."
# Council Decision of 7 November 2014 appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee (2014/779/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 7 November 2014

# appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

# (2014/779/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and                              Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015(1).

(2)A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of                              Mr André MORDANT,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Ms Anne DEMELENNE, *Secrétaire générale de la Fédération Générale du Travail de Belgique (FGTB) et Présidente de l'Interrégionale wallonne de                        la FGTB*, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 20 September 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

P. C. Padoan                            

1

OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Western Wireless Corporation, a Washington corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter
     ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

Dated: September 11, 2003

                                        By: /s/ JOHN W. STANTON
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John W. Stanton
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E N R I Q U E C E J A - A M E Z C U A , a ka E n r iq u e C e

ja ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70280 A ge nc yN os . A 097- 867- 716

A 097- 867- 737 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E nri qu e C ej a- A m ez cua and hi s w i fe M ar i a D elC arm en V az qu ez , nat i ves a nd c i t i z e ns of

M e xi c o, pe t i t i on pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on 

# FI LED JU N 03 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70280 2 A ppe a l s ’ de ni a l of

the i rm ot i on t o r e ope n the unde r l y i ng de ni a l of the i rappl i c a t i on f o rc a n c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l b a s e do n th e irf a ilu r e to e s tab lis h th e r e q u is ite h ar d s h ip t o the i rU ni t e d S t a t e s c i t i z e n c hi l dr e n. P et i t i on er s i ntrodu ce d n ew evi dence of hardshi p con si st i ng of evi dence that th e irs o n E n r iq u e w a s r e c e n tlyd ia g n o s e dw ith d e p r e s s io n a n das k in c o n d itio n . W e c onc l ude tha tthe B I A pr ope r l yc ons i de r e d the ne w e vi de nc e of f e r e d by pet i t i on er s, and act ed w i thi n i t s broad di sc re t i on i n d et erm i ni ng thatthe evi dence d idn o t e s tab lis h e x tr e m e h ar d s h ip , an dw a s in s u f f ic ie n t to w arr an t r e o p e n in g . See S i n gh v . I

NS , 2 9 5 F .3 d1 0 3 7 , 1 0 3 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n to re op en shal l be re vers ed on l y i f i ti s “ arbi trary , i rr at i on al , or contraryt o l aw ”) . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .
al_Ex10_4


		
			Exhibit 10.4
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Description of Future Compensation Arrangement between Air Lease Corporation 
		

		
			and Steven F. Udvar-Hazy, Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
		

		
			 
		

		
			Air Lease Corporation (“Company”) has entered into compensation arrangements with Mr. Steven F. Udvar-Hazy in connection with his appointment to the position of Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, effective July 1, 2016.  The following compensation arrangement provides for payments to be made in the future.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Beginning in 2017, Mr. Udvar-Hazy’s target bonus opportunity percentage under the Company’s performance-based annual cash incentive plan will be increased from 100% to 120% of base salary, subject to achieving Company performance objectives to be determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and he will no longer be eligible to participate in the Company’s Amended and Restated Deferred Bonus Plan.
RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST IV
                                Exhibit 99.2
                                ------------
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Christopher  Naunton,  Chief Financial  Officer of Ridgewood  Electric Power
Trust  IV.   (the   "Registrant"),certify,   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Registrant  for the period ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2003

                                       Signature:

                                       /s/ Christopher Naunton
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Christopher Naunton
                                       Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, I, John Q. Hammons, Chief Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
         of John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc.


                                               /s/ John Q. Hammons
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               John Q. Hammons


August 9, 2002
# C_2023094EN.01005801.xml

| 13.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/58

---

Action brought on 25 January 2023 — UF v Commission

(Case T-24/23)

(2023/C 94/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: UF (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 6 April 2022 dismissing the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 6 April 2022 dismissing the applicant;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the applicant a sum set ex aequo et bono for the non-material damage caused and to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the applicant a sum set ex aequo et bono for the non-material damage caused and to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons, the applicant’s rights of defence, the duty to have regard to the welfare of officials and the principle of proportionality. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons, the applicant’s rights of defence, the duty to have regard to the welfare of officials and the principle of proportionality.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 2(c) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 2(c) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging misuse of powers. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging misuse of powers.

---
STATE v. YOUNG

No. COA07-234

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 19, 2008.

Certification Date March 10, 2008.

Appeal from New Hanover (05CRS50571).

Decision without published opinion. No error.