alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Kendrick Donta COLSON.

No. 512P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 19, 2007.

Haral E. Carlin, for Colson.

John Snyder, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 650 S.E.2d 656.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of October 2007 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

*884"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of October 2007."
# Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/102 (repealed)Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/102 of 20 January 2015 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander            for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and            armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and repealing Decision Atalanta/4/2014 (ATALANTA/1/2015) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/102                     

# of 20 January 2015

# on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention                        and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and repealing Decision Atalanta/4/2014                        (ATALANTA/1/2015) (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/607 of 15 April 2015 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for                                 the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed                                 robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2015/102 (ATALANTA/3/2015).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 609 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 609

To amend section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that 
  funds received as universal service contributions and the universal 
 service support programs established pursuant to that section are not 
subject to certain provisions of title 31, United States Code, commonly 
                    known as the Antideficiency Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2007

 Mr. Rockefeller (for himself and Ms. Snowe) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that 
  funds received as universal service contributions and the universal 
 service support programs established pursuant to that section are not 
subject to certain provisions of title 31, United States Code, commonly 
                    known as the Antideficiency Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934.

    Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(m) Application of Antideficiency Act.--Section 1341 and 
subchapter II of chapter 15 of title 31, United States Code, do not 
apply--
            ``(1) to any amount collected or received as Federal 
        universal service contributions required by this section, 
        including any interest earned on such contributions; nor
            ``(2) to the expenditure or obligation of amounts 
        attributable to such contributions for universal service 
        support programs established pursuant to this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.2


                       RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Scott H. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Reckson Associates Realty
Corp., the sole general partner of Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. (the
"Company"), certify pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1)       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                  and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 12, 2002


                               Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.
                                 By: Reckson Associates Realty Corp.,
                                     its sole general partner



                                 By /s/ Scott H. Rechler
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Scott H. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit No. 11.  Statement re:    Computation  of  Per  Share  Earnings for  the
                 nine  and  three  months  ended  March  31,  1999  and 1998 (in
                 thousands except per share data).


                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                               March, 31,
                                                          ----------------------
                                                            1999          1998
                                                          -------        -------


     Net income                                           $   804        $   439
                                                          =======        =======



     Basic weighted average shares outstanding              3,304          3,758

     Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
        effect of stock options                                99            159
                                                          -------        -------

     Diluted weighted average common
        shares outstanding                                  3,409          3,917
                                                          =======        =======

     Basic earnings per share                             $  0.24        $  0.12
                                                          =======        =======

     Diluted earnings per share                           $  0.24        $  0.11
                                                          =======        =======
Amendment No.1 to Business Purchase Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.17

 Amendment Number 1 to Business Purchase Agreement 

This Amendment Number 1 to Business Purchase Agreement amends the Business Purchase Agreement dated as of July 12, 2010 between
Ubixo Limited and Ubixo Inc. (the “Agreement”). Words used in this Amendment with initial capital letters shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. This Amendment Number 1 shall take effect when executed by Assignee, Ubixo
Inc and Assignor, Ubixo Limited. 
 Schedule A of the Agreement ledgers the various agreements assigned by the Assignor to the
Assignee. The Assignee and the Assignor agree that this schedule will be replaced in its entirety by the Amended Schedule A attached to this Amendment Number 1. 
 4.1 of the Agreement states that the Consideration is valued at $93,923,588. The Assignee and the Assignor agree that this figure is inaccurate and that the Consideration is to be valued at $93,174,210.

 Subsequent to the signing of the Agreement Ubixo Inc. renamed itself Geotag Inc. The Assignee and the Assignor acknowledge
that the Assignee will be signing this Amendment Number 1 as Geotag Inc. 







  
 AMENDED SCHEDULE A

 ASSIGNED AGREEMENTS 
 Idearc Settlement Agreement between Idearc and Geomas (Int’l) Ltd., Geotag Management Group, LLC and Geomas Inc., dated December 31, 2008 

ICA Trust #2 Promissory Note in favor of Ubixo Limited, April 26, 2010 
 MKL Consulting Ltd. Promissory Note in favor of Ubixo Limited, July 1, 2010 
 MKL
Consulting Ltd. Promissory Note in favor of Ubixo Limited, July 10, 2010 
 Allied Provident Insurnace Inc. Promissory Note in
favor of Ubixo Limited, July 1, 2010 
 Zasis LLC Promissory Note in favor of Ubixo Limited, January 2009 

Zasis LLC Promissory Note in favor of Ubixo Limited, February 2009 
 Global Asset Fund Ltd. in favor of Ubixo Limited, February 2009 
 Global Asset Fund Ltd.
in favor of Ubixo Limited, September 2007 
 Global Asset Fund Ltd. Promissory Note in favor of Ubixo Limited, July 1, 2010

 European Securities Limited Promissory Note in favor of Ubixo Limited, April 16, 2010 

Cityhub.com Inc. Agreement between Cityhub and M2 Global, Lt., dated April 7, 2010 







  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment Number 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the parties hereto effective as of August 26, 2010. 
  

							
	ASSIGNOR	 		 	UBIXO LIMITED
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Darren Rennick

		 		 		 	Darren Rennick
		 		 		 	President
			
	ASSIGNEE	 		 	GEOTAG INC.
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Antony Norris

		 		 		 	Antony Norris
		 		 		 	President
----

(2004/C 88 E/0020)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1150/03

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject:   Seychelles

Recently, Colin Thelermont, after his escape from prison, was savagely tortured before being executed — a similar case in January 1999 ended with a summary execution.

As the Seychelles have ratified both the UN Convention on Torture and Other Cruel and Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the Convention against the Death Penalty (1 February 2002), what action does the European Union intend to take to make the Seychelles authorities face up to their responsibilities in this matter?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-1148/03 and E-1150/03

given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(6 May 2003)

The Community's relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States, as defined in the Cotonou Agreement, are based on respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.

Measures taken to improve democratisation and good governance in the Seychelles include the provision of substantial support for the development and consolidation of non-state entities through a capacity-building programme for Civil Society (15 % of 9th European Development Fund (EDF) allocated as funds directly accessible to non-state actors). This measure is designated to build capacity of non-state actors allowing them to develop into a valued and constructive partner in Seychelles's development.

In addition, the Commission has taken a number of initiatives in support of the democratic process over the past years (e.g. Delegation presence at elections; discussions with leaders of the opposition in Brussels as well as in Seychelles, etc.).

Concerning an eventual action the Union could take with regard to the specific allegations of torture, the Commission will contact the local Presidency in the Seychelles.

----
# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2029Show full title

Council Decision (EU) 2015/2029 of 10 November 2015 appointing one Maltese member and two Maltese alternate members of the            Committee of the Regions         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (EU) 2015/2029                     

# of 10 November 2015

# appointing one Maltese member and two Maltese alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Maltese Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 26 January, on 5 February and on 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116(1), (EU) 2015/190(2) and (EU) 2015/994(3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January                              2020.

(2)A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Peter BONELLO.

(3)An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate on the basis                              of which Mr Frederick CUTAJAR *(Mayor of Santa Lucija)* was proposed.

(4)An alternate member's seat would become vacant following the appointment of Mr Anthony MIFSUD as member of the Committee of                              the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2020:                  
          -  Mr Anthony MIFSUD, *Councillor, Imtarfa Local Council*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

The following are hereby appointed as alternate members to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term                     of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:                  
          -  Mr Frederick CUTAJAR, *Deputy Mayor, Santa Lucija Local Council*,                         
          -  Mrs Graziella GALEA, *Mayor, Saint Paul's Bay Local Council*.                         

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

P. Gramegna                            

1

OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42.                           

2

OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25.                           

3

OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70.
# CE2004088EN.01035601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/356 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/356

---

(2004/C 88 E/0361)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1576/03

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(8 May 2003)

Subject:   EU-wide energy taxation

Subject:

Following the recent agreement in the Council regarding the introduction of minimum energy taxation across the EU, what steps will the Commission now take to secure implementation of the agreement?

When does it plan to propose the necessary measures, and by when does it hope that they will be applied through the EU?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(5 June 2003)

(5 June 2003)

The Council unanimously reached a political agreement on the draft energy tax Directive on 23 March 2003. Supporting the view of the Commission, the Council decided on 9 April 2003 to reconsult the Parliament. This decision was adopted because the latest compromise is significantly different from the proposal presented by the Commission in 1997 (1). It is, therefore, important that the Parliament has the opportunity to give its opinion on the draft Directive.

1

The formal Council decision on the adoption of the energy tax Directive will only intervene after the Parliament has delivered its opinion.

The Commission is committed to helping Member States and Applicant Countries in their work for the transposition of the Directive. Technical meetings will be organised at services level to streamline the transposition process and secure a rapid high quality transposition.

The Directive will normally enter into force on 1 January 2004, with the exception of a few articles which apply retrospectively from 1 January 2003.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 6.5.1997.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GREGORY LINDEL BURNS JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 375 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

EDWARD CHARLES REDMOND, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D22-448

LT Case No. 2015-CF-012387-C-O

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed August 30, 2022

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Orange County, 

Elaine A. Barbour, Judge.

David M. Lamos, Ft. Pierce, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

COHEN, TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.4
Sequent Energy Management
An AGL Resources Company             


    
1200 Smith Street, Suite 900
Houston, TX  77002
832-397-1700
www.sequentenergy.com


May 13, 2016


Roanoke Gas Company
519 Kimball Ave., N.E.
Roanoke, VA 24016
Attn:  Michael Gagnet


RE:    Notice of Renewal of Natural Gas Asset Management Agreement


Ladies and Gentlemen:


Reference is made to that certain Natural Gas Asset Management Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated November 1, 2013, by and between Roanoke Gas Company ("Counterparty") and Sequent Energy Management, L.P. ("Manager"), pursuant to which Manager provides natural gas supply and asset management services to Counterparty for a Term that is currently set to expire March 31, 2017.  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.


Pursuant to Section 9.01 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be renewed for twelve (12) months at the end of the Term, when both Parties notify the other in writing at least ninety (90) days before the end of the Term of its intent to renew.  The purpose of this letter agreement (this “Letter Agreement”) is to provide such written notice by each party to the other of its intent and agreement to renew the Agreement for an additional twelve (12) months at the end of the current Term.  Based on such agreement the Term of the Agreement is hereby extended through March 31, 2018.


The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that all other terms, provisions, covenants and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  This Letter Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts.  Please have this Letter Agreement executed on behalf of Counterparty in the space provided below to indicate Counterparty’s agreement with the foregoing and return one fully executed copy of this Letter Agreement to the undersigned.  


Sincerely,


Sequent Energy Management, L.P.


By: /s/ James J. Goerig                  
Name: James J. Goerig                  
Title: Vice President, Risk Control    


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


Roanoke Gas Company


By: /s/ John S. D'Orazio               
Name: John S. D'Orazio              
Title: President and CEO
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 444/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 444/2014 of 30 April 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 444/2014                     

# of 30 April 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. Valentin GUILLEN.

No. 33P08-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of April 2008 by Defendant for a Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, James A. Bowman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Encision Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



Dated:
August 14, 2002.

| |  | /s/JAMES A. BOWMANJames A. Bowman
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

I,
Marcia McHaffie, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of Encision Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



Dated:
August 14, 2002.

| |  | /s/MARCIA MCHAFFIEMarcia McHaffie
Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks