alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following list sets forth the direct and indirect subsidiaries
of the registrant as of March 31, 2006 and their respective jurisdictions of incorporation or organization:



|                                |  |                       
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|SUBSIDIARY                      |  | JURISDICTION          
|Vert Tech LLC                   |  | Delaware              
|Verticalnet Ltd. (Israel)       |  | Israel                
|Verticalnet International LLC   |  | Delaware              
|Verticalnet Europe B.V.         |  | Amsterdam, Netherlands
|Verticalnet LTD                 |  | England and Wales     
|Verticalnet Software, Inc.      |  | Delaware              
|Verticalnet Employees I Corp.   |  | Delaware              
|Tigris Consulting UK, Ltd.      |  | England and Wales     
|Verticalnet Employees II Corp.  |  | Delaware              
|B2eMarkets, B.V.                |  | Amsterdam, Netherlands
|B2eMarkets UK Ltd.              |  | England and Wales     
|B2eMarkets France S.A.R.L.      |  | France                
|B2e Contract Management, Inc.   |  | Delaware              
|B2e Sourcing Optimization, Inc. |  | Delaware              
|Digital Union LTD               |  | England and Wales
STATE of North Carolina v. Stepen Kernal SINGS.

No. 169P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Sings.

Gary Govert, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 641 S.E.2d 370.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 10th day of April 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000930548
<NAME> RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          42,029
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,075
<PP&E>                                       2,499,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                (189,482)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,893,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,342
<BONDS>                                      1,390,393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        152
<COMMON>                                           521
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,149,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,893,868
<SALES>                                        156,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,348
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,401
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,788
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51


</TABLE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints  each of Adolph J. Ferro and Gilbert N.  Miller,  signing  singly,  the
undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

         1. Execute for and on behalf of the undersigned,  in the  undersigned's
capacity  as  a  director  of  Agritope,   Inc.,  a  Delaware  Corporation  (the
"Company"),  Forms 10-K, 10-Q or 8-K, and any amendments  thereto, in accordance
with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
the rules and regulations thereunder.

         2. Do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned
which may be  necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 10-K,
10-Q or 8-K,  and any  amendments  thereto,  and  timely  file  such  forms  and
amendments  with the United States  Securities  and Exchange  Commission and the
Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. or similar authority.

         3. Take any other action of any type  whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact,  may be of benefit to,
in the best  interest  of, or legally  required  by, the  undersigned,  it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned  pursuant to this Power of Attorney  shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such  attorney-in-fact  may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

         This Power of Attorney  shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned  is no  longer  required  to sign  Forms  10-K,  10-Q and  8-K,  and
amendments  thereto,  on behalf of the Company,  unless  earlier  revoked by the
undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney
to be executed as of this 23rd day of December, 1998.



                                             /S/ Michel de Beaumont
                                             -----------------------------------
# C_2023338EN.01000701.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 25 May 2023 — Verbraucherzentrale Baden-Württemberg e.V. v Aldi Süd Dienstleistungs-SE & Co. OHG

(Case C-330/23, Aldi Süd)

(2023/C 338/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Verbraucherzentrale Baden-Württemberg e.V.

Defendant: Aldi Süd Dienstleistungs-SE & Co. OHG

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 6a(1) and (2) of the Price Indication Directive (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a percentage mentioned in an announcement of a price reduction may relate only to the prior price within the meaning of Article 6a(2) of the Price Indication Directive? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 6a(1) and (2) of the Price Indication Directive (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a percentage mentioned in an announcement of a price reduction may relate only to the prior price within the meaning of Article 6a(2) of the Price Indication Directive?

| 2. | Is Article 6a(1) and (2) of the Price Indication Directive to be interpreted as meaning that emphasis in advertising which is intended to stress the reasonable price of an offer (such as the description of the price as a ‘Price Highlight’), where it is used in an announcement of a price reduction, must relate to the prior price within the meaning of Article 6a(2) of the Price Indication Directive? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 6a(1) and (2) of the Price Indication Directive to be interpreted as meaning that emphasis in advertising which is intended to stress the reasonable price of an offer (such as the description of the price as a ‘Price Highlight’), where it is used in an announcement of a price reduction, must relate to the prior price within the meaning of Article 6a(2) of the Price Indication Directive?

---

(1)  Directive 98/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 on consumer protection in the indication of the prices of products offered to consumers (OJ 1998 L 80, p. 27), last amended by Directive (EU) 2019/2161 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directives 98/6/EC, 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the better enforcement and modernisation of Union consumer protection rules (OJ 2019 L 328, p. 7).

---
STATE v. BERNARD.

No. COA07-1289.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (06CRS39494, 06CRS39495, 06CRS39496, 06CRS39497).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

VASCO Data Security International, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-62829), Form S-3 (333-108793), and on Form S-1 (333-124458) of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 14, 2008, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports areincluded in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. 

Our report on the consolidated financialstatements refers to the Company’s adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, *Share-Based Payment*, modifying share-based compensation in 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 14, 2008
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>
  
  
<ARTICLE> 5  
<LEGEND>  
This schedule contains summary financial information 
extracted from the Registrant's unaudited interim financial 
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to those financial statements.  
</LEGEND>  
<CIK> 0000930364  
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST IV  
         
<S>                                       <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997  
<CASH>                                      12,220,265  
<SECURITIES>                                13,551,669<F1>  
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,253,486  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0  
<INVENTORY>                                    383,810  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,879,904  
<PP&E>                                      14,341,670  
<DEPRECIATION>                                <717,390>  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,092,309  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,301,122  
<BONDS>                                      5,037,916  
<COMMON>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,141,694  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,029,309  
<SALES>                                      4,850,561  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,127,311  
<CGS>                                        3,434,865  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,434,865  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,416,880  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             436,794  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                776,371<F2> 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            776,371  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   776,371  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1,628.29  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1,628.29  
  
<FN>  
<F1>Investment in hydroelectric project partnership and corporation and in 
wood-burning project limited liability company 
accounted for on equity method in financial statements.  
<F2>After deduction of minority interest in Providence Project 
earnings of $414,063.
</FN>  
          

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donna Brandin, ChiefFinancial Officer of Equity Residential, general partner of ERPOP, certify,pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and           |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of ERPOP. |

 

 
| /s/                     | Donna Brandin |   |
|-------------------------|---------------|--------|
| Donna Brandin           |          |
| Chief Financial Officer |          |
| of Equity Residential   |          |
| November 7, 2005   |          |
|                         |               |        |  |

 

----
Robin Joyce HELMS v. Donald Ray HELMS.

No. 340A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

John W. Ceruzzi, Jacksonville, for Donald Helms.

Lori M. Rosbrugh, Wilmington, for Robin Helms.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 661 S.E.2d 906.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of July 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."

Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Defendant's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
# CE2004088EN.01000201.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/2

---

(2004/C 88 E/0002)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0043/03

by Gian Gobbo (NI) to the Commission

(14 January 2003)

Subject:   Introduction of a minimum rate of excise duty on wine

Subject:

The Commission has apparently drafted a proposal aimed at introducing a minimum rate of excise duty on wine of EUR 0,14 per litre (LIT 270) from 2003 and EUR 0,15 from 2007.

This would constitute a further fiscal and bureaucratic burden on one of the most advanced sectors of European agriculture and one of the most competitive at world level.

In many EU countries, including Italy, there is no excise duty on wine and thus its introduction, far from constituting harmonisation of the tax system, would actually represent the levying of a new tax.

Does the Commission not consider that the introduction of excise duty on wine might put producers at a disadvantage?

Does it not consider it worthwhile to safeguard and promote European wine production, which has its roots in our civilisation's most distant past and is an integral part of Europe's cultural and religious imagery?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(30 January 2003)

(30 January 2003)

Council Directive 92/84/EEC, of 19 October 1992, deals with the approximation of rates of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages (1). Under its provisions it is necessary for the excise duty rates laid down in that Directive to be reviewed periodically by Council. This review shall be based upon a Commission report.

1

The Commission is preparing such a report at present, which will take into account all relevant issues, in particular the proper functioning of the internal market, competition between the different categories of alcoholic drinks, the real value of the rates of duty and the wider objectives of the EC Treaty, as provided by Article 8 of the said Directive. These considerations will also include the situation of producers and the other elements mentioned by the Honourable Member.

---

(1)  OJ L 316, 31.10.1992.

1

---
MOORE v. MILLS.

No. 255A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 14, 2008.

Gary K. Sue, Stephanie W. Anderson, Greensboro, for Mills.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 660 S.E.2d 589.

The following order has been entered on the joint motion filed on the 14th day of October 2008 to Withdraw Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of October 2008."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 53797)    
The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than September 26, 2005.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Patrick M. Wilder, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

*1.  Mark Tolliver and Catherine Averill*, both of Orland Park, Illinois; to acquire voting shares of Admiral Family Banks, Inc., Alsip, Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Federated Bank, Onarga, Illinois.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 6, 2005.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 05-17957 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2




SECOND AMENDMENT TO JANUARY 22, 2013 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.




WHEREAS, FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) has heretofore entered into an Employment Agreement dated January 22, 2013 (the “Agreement”), amended by a First Amendment to January 22, 2013 Employment Agreement dated August 14, 2015 (“First Amendment”), by and between Peter G. Nixon (the “Executive”) and the Company and the parties thereto desire to amend the Agreement in the manner set forth below. 


NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties to the Agreement agree that the Agreement shall be amended as follows, and that there is mutual, adequate and lawful consideration the receipt of which each acknowledges through execution of this Second Amendment. 


		
	1.
	The Term of Employment as defined in Section 2 of the Agreement, and as amended in Paragraph 1 of the First Amendment, shall continue through December 31, 2019, unless terminated sooner or renewed as provided in the Agreement. 




		
	2.
	Except as specifically provided above, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




Wherefore, the parties hereto agree to this Second Amendment, with the foregoing changes being effective as of May 16, 2016.


FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.




/s/ Paul H. Sunu                        
By:    Paul H. Sunu
Title:    Chief Executive Officer


EXECUTIVE




/s/ Peter G. Nixon                        
Peter G. Nixon