alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 4.73 Schedule of Fixed Rate InterNotes Issued Interest
    
    
    InterestCoupon
    
    
    Coupon
    
    
    Issue
    
    
    Maturity
    
    
    Principal
    
    
    RedemptionCUSIP No.
    
    Rate
    
    
    Frequency
    
    
    Date
    
    
    Date
    
    
    Amount
    
    
    Information26876EAN5
    
    
    4.000
    %
    
    Semi-annual
    
    
    10/15/04
    
    
    
    10/15/08
    
    
    $
    2,112,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAP0
    
    
    3.900
    %
    
    Semi-annual
    
    
    10/21/04
    
    
    
    10/15/08
    
    
    $
    691,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAQ8
    
    
    3.800
    %
    
    Quarterly
    
    
    10/28/04
    
    
    
    10/15/08
    
    
    $
    968,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAR6
    
    
    3.300
    %
    
    Semi-annual
    
    
    11/26/04
    
    
    
    11/15/06
    
    
    $
    586,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAS4
    
    
    3.900
    %
    
    Monthly
    
    
    11/26/04
    
    
    
    11/15/08
    
    
    $
    1,091,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAT2
    
    
    3.350
    %
    
    Monthly
    
    
    12/02/04
    
    
    
    12/15/06
    
    
    $
    442,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAU9
    
    
    3.950
    %
    
    Semi-annual
    
    
    12/02/04
    
    
    
    12/15/08
    
    
    $
    520,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAV7
    
    
    3.500
    %
    
    Quarterly
    
    
    12/09/04
    
    
    
    12/15/06
    
    
    $
    385,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAW5
    
    
    4.100
    %
    
    Semi-annual
    
    
    12/09/04
    
    
    
    12/15/08
    
    
    $
    1,381,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAX3
    
    
    3.350
    %
    
    Quarterly
    
    
    12/16/04
    
    
    
    12/15/06
    
    
    $
    214,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAY1
    
    
    3.950
    %
    
    Semi-annual
    
    
    12/16/04
    
    
    
    12/15/08
    
    
    $
    820,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EAZ8
    
    
    3.375
    %
    
    Quarterly
    
    
    12/23/04
    
    
    
    12/15/06
    
    
    $
    712,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EBA2
    
    
    4.000
    %
    
    Monthly
    
    
    12/23/04
    
    
    
    06/15/09
    
    
    $
    430,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EBB0
    
    
    3.450
    %
    
    Semi-annual
    
    
    12/30/04
    
    
    
    12/15/06
    
    
    $
    585,000
    
    
    Non-callable26876EBC8
    
    
    4.000
    %
    
    Semi-annual
    
    
    12/30/04
    
    
    
    12/15/08
    
    
    $
    1,405,000
    
    
    Non-callable
STATE v. Audrey GOBAL.

No. 545A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 17, 2007.

Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Gobal.

C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for. State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of December 2007 by State of NC for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. State of NC shall have up to and including the 6th day of February 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of December 2007."
In re ESTATE OF Pauline MILLS.

No. 572P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Franklin S. Hancock, Monroe, for Jerry S. Mills.

Robert D. Mills, Pro Se.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of February 2008 by Appellees (Greene & Tomberlin) to impose sanctions in the form of reasonable attorney's fees:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,140
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         3,718
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    18,134
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        93,210
<ALLOWANCE>                                    203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,911
<DEPOSITS>                                     96,099
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,315
<LONG-TERM>                                    11,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,220
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 123,911
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                3,672
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              620
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               51
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               4,343
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,136
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,361
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,982
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  1
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                843
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     843
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   504
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.52
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   34
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               215
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  12
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              203
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           203
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 16, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-10586

 

AMERICAN REGISTRY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,

versus

LUTHER E. MCCLELLLAN

Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:00-CV-0257)

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
EOP Operating Limited Partnership (the Company), each hereby certifies that
to his / her knowledge, on the date hereof:



|(a) |  | the Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31,
2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 15, 2004
    
    /s/ RICHARD D. KINCAIDRichard D. KincaidPresident and Chief Executive Officer of
Equity Office Properties Trust, the general partner of
EOP Operating Limited PartnershipDate: March 15, 2004
    
    /s/ MARSHA C. WILLIAMSMarsha C. WilliamsExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Equity Office Properties Trust, the general partner ofEOP Operating Limited Partnership


85
Opinion issued March 27, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00136-CV

———————————

IN RE BOB BENNETT A/K/A ROBERT S. BENNETT, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 12, 2014, the relator, Bob Bennett a/k/a Robert S. Bennett, filed 

a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that the Court enter an order declaring

real parties in interest’s claims for attorney’s fees discharged and vacating all trial 

court orders entered after December 30, 2010, including a trial setting.

1

 

1

The underlying case is Kelly Coghlan, Coghlan & Associates, Richard and Janice 

Pullman as Guardians of Michael Pullman and Winn Beaudry & Winn, LLP v. 

Bob Bennett a/k/a Robert S. Bennett, No. 759593, in the County Civil Court at 

Law No. 2 of Harris County Texas, the Honorable John Wooldridge presiding.
2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dismiss all pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 13 97

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Deb or ah Ann Fran ci s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Je ffre y Sh or ba ; M arkTho m

ps on ; Lea h Werm ers ki rch en
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta- Mi nn eap ol is

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 2, 2 01 3 Fi le d: Octo be r 9, 2 01 3 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, BOW MAN, an d KELLY, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Deb or ah Fran ci s ap pe al s fro m th e di s t r i c t co urt’s ad ve rs e gr an t of su m m ary 1 jud gm en t in he r 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n al le gi ng th at th e gr an d jury se le ct io n pr oc es s in Mi nn es ot a’s Fo urth Ju di ci al Dis tri ct vi ol at es th e F o u r te en th Am en dm en t. Upo n
care fu l d e n ov o rev ie w, se e Sch oe lc h v. Mi tc he ll , 62 5 F.3d 10 41 , 10 45 -4 6 (8t h Cir. 20 10 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w), we ag ree wit h th e di st ric t co urt’s reas on s fo r co nc lu di ng th at Fran ci s fai le d to es tabl is h a pr im a faci e cas e fo r a F o u r t e e n t h Am en dm en t vi ol at io n. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

Th e Hon or ab le Su sa n Ri ch ard Nels on , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 Dis tri ct of Mi nn es ot a, ad op ti ng th e r e p o r t an d reco m m en da ti on s of th e Hon or ab le Arth urJ. Bo y lan, Un it edSta te s M ag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta

. -2

-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000930548
<NAME>                 RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          26,514
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  224,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,087
<PP&E>                                       2,369,426
<DEPRECIATION>                                (254,595)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,885,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,892
<BONDS>                                      1,426,414
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    313,126
<COMMON>                                       937,269
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,886,772
<SALES>                                        216,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,105
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,480
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             64,480
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,739
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Order filed June 26, 2018. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00253-CV

____________

WRIGHT W. GORE JR., Appellant

V.

PACIFIC WESTERN EQUIPMENT FINANCE, ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 93938-CV

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 5, 2018. The notice of 

appeal was due April 4, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed 

the notice of appeal on April 5, 2018, a date within 15 days of the due date for the 

notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the 

perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 

959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still 
obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. 

See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 26.3; 10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will 

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT
        32**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Tegal Corporation, a Delaware
        corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas
        R. Mika, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my
        knowledge:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Thomas
                R. MikaChief
                  Executive Officer and President
                August
                  14 , 2006
    **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Tegal Corporation, a Delaware
        corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
        Christine Hergenrother, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
        my knowledge:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Christine
                  HergenrotherChief
                      Financial Officer
                    August
                      14, 2006
   54
STATE v. LITTLE.

No. COA07-62.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (03CRS47465, 03CRS226102, 03CRS226103).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error; Motion for Appropriate Relief remanded.
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Lee THACKER.

No. 351P04-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Robert Lee Thacker, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, David Saacks, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*392*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of February 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Durham County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
# **Exhibit 32.1**

 

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,the Chief Executive Officer of Western Sizzlin Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2005 and the financial statements contained therein, fully comply with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q and thefinancial statements thereto fairly present, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 31,2005, and the period then ended.

 
| /s/ James C. Verney |   |   | May 16, 2005 |
|---------------------|--------|--------|-------------------|

 

1

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Edgar SIMON.

No. 453P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Edgar Simon, Beverly Hills, CA, for Simon.

Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 648 S.E.2d 853.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of September 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
ex_10-6.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



  



Oral Agreement 


Date January 20, 2016


 


 


 


This Oral Agreement (further the Agreement) in composed between Newmarkt Corp. (further the Corporation) and Denis Razvodovskij (further the President) in consideration of the following:


 


The President hereby verbally confirm the ability to loan to the Corporation funds in the amount of $100,000 USA dollars (one hundred thousand USA dollars) for the purpose of the Corporation’s needs, such as expanses related to the Form S-1 Registration Statement and other necessary provisions I regards to the Corporation’s business operations. 


 


 


 


Confirmation signatures of the Corporation and the President:


 


 


/s/ Design Razvodovskij__________________________________________ 


Newmarkt Corp./ Denis Razvodovskij
Eddie R. KYLE, Plaintiff-Employee, v. HOLSTON GROUP, Defendant-Employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Carrier.

No. 170P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Shannon Warf Beach, Ann C. Rowe, Winston-Salem, for Holston & Liberty Mut'l.

*906Celeste M. Harris, Winston-Salem, for Kyle.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 656 S.E.2d 667.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 15th day of April 2008 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                                                     Cable Beach Court, Suite#I
[FIDRA HOLDINGS LTD. LOGO]                           West Bay Street
                                                     P.O. Box CB-11728
                                                     Nassau, Bahamas

                                                     Tel: (242) 327-4630
                                                     Fax: (242) 327-4633

December 13, 1999

Floridino's International Holdings Ltd.,
494 La Guardia Place
New York, N.Y.,

Dear Sir,

                                COMMITMENT LETTER
                                    TERM LOAN

We confirm that our Board has confirmed that we may extend financing to your
company on the following terms and conditions.

         BORROWER:    Floridino's International Holdings Ltd.,

         AMOUNT:      USD $500,000 (US Five hundred thousand dollars only)

         PURPOSE:     To provide a mortgage on the buildings listed on Schedule
                      "A" attached, owned by Toho Holdings Ltd.

         SECURITY:    Promissory Note for USD $500,000 signed by the Borrower.

                      Debenture for the sum of USD $500,000 over the buildings
                      listed on Schedule "A" attached, in favor of Fidra
                      Holdings Ltd.

                      Guarantee for USD $500,000 - issued by Floridino's
                      International Holdings Ltd. in favor of Fidra Holdings
                      Ltd.

         INTEREST:    9% p.a. Payable quarterly in arrears.

         REPAYMENT:   Interest only for the first 12 months. Thereafter the loan
                      will be amortized over a period of 15 years, with
                      repayment quarterly in arrears. The Borrower will have the
                      option to make a balloon payment at the end of month 36,
                      without penalty.

<PAGE>

PAGE 2

         INSURANCE:   Buildings to be insured against fire with Fidra Holdings
                      Ltd. shown as first payee for the first USD $500,000.

         COMMITMENT
         FEE:         Waived

         LEGAL FEES:  For the account of the Borrower.

Kindly sign and return by facsimile a copy of this letter in confirmation that
the above terms and conditions are acceptable to you.

Yours sincerely,

/s/ Iain Brown Sr.
Iain Brown Sr.,
Managing Director

AGREED & ACCEPTED:-

/s/ Nick Pirgousis                        12/15/1999
------------------                        ----------
BORROWER                                  DATE