alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           APR-3-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-2-1999
<CASH>                                           4,390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,808
<INVENTORY>                                     59,315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,116
<PP&E>                                          31,562
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,651
<BONDS>                                          3,818
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,161
<SALES>                                        141,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,418
<CGS>                                          111,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    583
<INCOME-TAX>                                        99
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                484
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1023/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1023/2014 of 26 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1023/2014                     

# of 26 September 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 September 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# C_2023063EN.01006402.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/64

---

Action brought on 22 December 2022 — Poland v European Commission

(Case T-830/22)

(2023/C 63/82)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and S. Żyrek, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decisions of the European Commission contained in the letters of 12 October 2022 (1) and 23 November 2022 (2) concerning the offsetting of the amounts receivable by way of the daily penalty payments imposed by the order of the Vice-President of the Court of Justice of 27 October 2021 (Commission v Poland, C-204/21 R, EU:C:2021:878) with regard to the period from 15 July 2022 to 29 August 2022; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions of the European Commission contained in the letters of 12 October 2022 (1) and 23 November 2022 (2) concerning the offsetting of the amounts receivable by way of the daily penalty payments imposed by the order of the Vice-President of the Court of Justice of 27 October 2021 (Commission v Poland, C-204/21 R, EU:C:2021:878) with regard to the period from 15 July 2022 to 29 August 2022;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 101 and 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council, (3) read in conjunction with Article 98 thereof, in that the procedure for recovery by offsetting of the amounts receivable was applied, whereas the order of 27 October 2021 had imposed daily penalty payments for the period until the date of compliance with the order of the Vice-President of the Court of Justice of 14 July 2021 (4) and the provisions whose application was required to be suspended by the order of 14 July 2021 had ceased to apply on 15 July 2022.

---

(1)  Letter from the European Commission of 12 October 2022, Ref. ARES(2022)7041596.

(2)  Letter from the European Commission of 23 November 2022, Ref. ARES(2022)8087579.

(3)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1).

(4)  Order of the Vice-President of the Court of Justice of 14 July 2021, Commission v Poland, C-204/21 R, EU:C:2021:593.

---
STATE v. THOMPSON.

No. COA06-247.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 20, 2007.

Certification Date March 12, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS224860, 04CRS224861).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Henri Navothly YOUNG.

No. 560A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Mark Montgomery, Durham, for Young.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 651 S.E.2d 576.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 20th day of November 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, T. Kendall Hunt,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     i.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     ii.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ T. Kendall Hunt
-------------------------------------
T. Kendall Hunt
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board of Directors

March 15, 2006
STATE v. PINDER.

No. COA07-1413.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 17, 2008.

Certification Date July 7, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (06CRS85336).

Case reported without published opinion. Remanded for resentencing.
POTTLE, et al. v. LINK, et al.

No. 27PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Cheryl A. Marteney, New Bern, G. Grady Richardson, Jr., Wilmington, Signey S. Eagles, Jr., Elizabeth Brooks Scherer, Raleigh, for Link and Willetts.

David S. Pokela, Greensboro, for Duke Energy Carolinas.

Matthew D. Rhoad, Andrea B. Short, Raleigh, for CP&L, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 654 S.E.2d 64.

The following order has been entered on the joint motion filed on the 30th day of September 2008 for Motion to Dismiss Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of October 2008."

MARTIN, J., recused.
Exhibit 13.1





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anonimabursatilde capital variableunder the laws of Mexico (the “Company”), does hereby certify that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge:





1.
The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




June 16, 2011





By:
/s/Rodolfo Ramos ArvizuRodolfo Ramos ArvizuChief Executive Officer





June 16, 2011





By:
/s/Daniel Salazar FerrerDaniel Salazar FerrerChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and will be retained by Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5184] 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        On January 31, 2005, Notice was published on page 4913 of the                         **Federal Register**                         (Volume 70, Number 19) by the Department of State pertaining to the exhibition “Fra Angelico.” The referenced Notice is hereby corrected to include eight additional loans imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, which I hereby determine are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY from on or about October 25, 2005 to on or about January 29, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: August 31, 2005. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 05-17806 Filed 9-7-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
# The Social Security (Claims and Payments) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2014 No. 73

Social Security

# The Social Security (Claims and Payments) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

11th March 2014

Coming into operation

1st April 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.4.2015) by The Social Security (Claims and Payments) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2015 (S.R. 2015/109), regs. 1, **3**
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 13, 2014

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D13- 1704

Lower Tribunal No. 02-12509C

________________



### Hector Caraballo

, Appellant,

Vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William

Thomas

, Judge.

Hector Caraballo, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano

, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Hector Caraballo appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to void his

plea in case number F02-12509C. Although the State has filed its Answer Briefmaintaining its position that the record was sufficient to support the trial court’s

denial of Caraballo’s motion to void the plea, the State does not object to

remanding the case for an evidentiary hearing so that the trial court can reconsider

the issue.

Caraballo claims in his Initial Brief that the court translator did not properly

translate the plea agreement. However, for practical considerations as outlined in

the State’s motion to expedite, we reverse and remand the case for an evidentiary

hearing so Caraballo’s claim that the court translator erroneously interpreted the

plea agreement and thus misadvised him regarding the nature of the plea

agreement and/or sentence can be considered.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

2
STATE of North Carolina. v. Michael Anthony TART.

No. 215P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Anne Bleyman, for Tart.

Leonard Green, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th day of May 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of May 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
In re J.G., A Minor Juvenile. Appealed by Jason and Belinda Genwright.

No. 115P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Jason Genwright, Pro Se, for J.G.

Belinda Genwright, Pro Se, for Genwright.

E. Marshall Woodall, Lillington, for Harnett County DSS.

Pamela N. Williams, Attorney Advocate, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondents (Jason and Belinda Genwright) on the 11th day of March 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
STATE v. Christopher Melvin HUNT.

No. 400P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 5, 2008.

Haral E. Carlin, Fayetteville, for Hunt.

*466L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of September 2008 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of September 2008."
# Council Decision of 8 September 2014 appointing an Estonian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions (2014/655/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 8 September 2014

# appointing an Estonian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/655/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Estonian Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr                              Juri GOTMANS,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term                     of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Mr Juri GOTMANS, *Mayor of Haanja Rural Municipality (change of mandate)*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
EXHIBIT 13.(a).1.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Tefron Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certify that to the best of our knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 1, 2004                             /s/ Yosef Shiran
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Name:  Yosef Shiran
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 1, 2004                             /s/ Gil Rozen
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Name:  Gil Rozen
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Matthew Patrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Matthew G. Patrick



Matthew G. Patrick
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2003
STATE v. Jose Miguel VENTURA.

No. 343P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Arthur Donadio, Raleigh, for Ventura.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of July 2008 by Defendant to Join for Consideration (221P08 & 344P08):

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."