alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CNA SURETY CORPORATION
AND CCC SURETY OPERATIONS EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES
AND SCHEDULES THERETO INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            423914
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  487609
<CASH>                                           17746
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               55350
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           74488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  819370
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 150020
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             183708
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 113000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           441
<OTHER-SE>                                      309456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    819370
<PREMIUMS>                                      258737
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              24259
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 844
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                       44998
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     105420
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             46546
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  73758
<INCOME-TAX>                                     28243
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              45515
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     45515
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 122,725
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             49,350
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               (4,352)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               6,094
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                19,595
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                142,034
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                         (4,352)
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Lori Shannon ICARD.

No. 236A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 23, 2008.

C. Scott Holmes, Durham, for Icard.

James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of May 2008 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of May 2008."
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3693 

To limit the amount of compensation for employees and executives of financial 

institutions assisted under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2008 

Mr. SANDERS (for himself, Mrs. LINCOLN, and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To limit the amount of compensation for employees and 

executives of financial institutions assisted under the 

Troubled Asset Relief Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop the Greed on 

5 Wall Street Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO TARP. 

7 Section 111 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization 

8 Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–343) is amended by striking 

9 subsections (b) and (c) and inserting the following: 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3693 IS

1 ‘‘(b) LIMITS ON COMPENSATION.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

3 provision of law or agreement to the contrary, no 

4 employee or executive of a financial institution that 

5 is assisted under the TARP may receive aggregate 

6 annual compensation, in any form, from the finan7 cial institution in an amount in excess of the amount 

8 paid to the President of the United States in accord9 ance with section 102 of title 3 of the United States 

10 Code. 

11 ‘‘(2) PREVIOUS COMPENSATION APPLIED TO AG12 GREGATE.—If an employee or executive of a finan13 cial institution that is assisted under the TARP has 

14 received aggregate annual compensation in excess of 

15 the amount paid to the President, as described in 

16 paragraph (1), for a calendar year prior to the date 

17 on which the financial institution first receives as18 sistance under the TARP, such employee or execu19 tive shall be prohibited from receiving any further 

20 compensation for such service during that calendar 

21 year. 

22 ‘‘(3) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this sec23 tion, ‘aggregate annual compensation’ includes bo24 nuses, deferred compensation, stock options, securiVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:07 Nov 20, 2008 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3693.IS S3693

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 3693 IS

1 ties, or any other form of compensation provided to 

2 an employee or executive. 

3 ‘‘(c) REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS.—If a financial in4 stitution assisted under the TARP elects not to comply 

5 with the requirements of subsection (b), such financial in6 stitution shall immediately reimburse the Secretary for 

7 any amounts that it received under the TARP to that 

8 point. Such reimbursed funds shall be used by the Sec9 retary for foreclosure mitigation efforts, as determined ap10 propriate by the Secretary and in accordance with this 

11 Act.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Opinion issued March 27, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 1 4

- 0 0136

- CV

——————————— IN RE BOB BENNETT A/K/A RO BERT S. BENNETT , R elator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 12, 2014 , the relator, Bob Bennett a/k/a Robert S. Bennett , filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that the Court enter an order declaring real parties in interest’s claims for attorney’s fees discharged and vacating all trial
court orders entered after December 30, 2010, including a trial setting

. 1

1 The underlying case is Kelly Coghlan, Coghlan & Associates, Richard and Janice Pullman as Guardians of Michael Pullman and Winn Beaudry & Winn, LLP v. Bob Bennett a/k/a Robert S. Bennett , No. 759593 , in the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County Texas, the Honorable John Wooldridge presiding.2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dismiss all pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIA M

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                           1,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,979
<INVENTORY>                                     39,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,846
<PP&E>                                          51,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,242
<BONDS>                                         53,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,689
<SALES>                                        127,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,315
<CGS>                                           81,191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,427
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,301
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,699
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .90<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
<FN>
<F1>Represents basic income per common share
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership
(ERPOP) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Parrell, Chief Financial Officer of Equity Residential, general
partner of ERPOP, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark J. Parrell                                    
|Mark J. Parrell                                        
|Chief Financial Officer of Registrants General Partner
|August 7, 2008
# C_2023235EN.01002001.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 18 April 2023 — Novo Nordisk AS v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-248/23, Novo Nordisk)

(2023/C 235/24)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Novo Nordisk AS

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Question referred

Must Article 90(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) be interpreted as precluding the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings, under which a pharmaceutical company which makes payments ex lege to the State health insurance agency based on the revenue obtained from publicly funded pharmaceutical products is not entitled subsequently to reduce the taxable amount, by reason of the fact that the payments are made ex lege, that payments made under a funding volume agreement and investments made by the company in research and development in the health sector may be deducted from the base amount for the payment obligation, and that the amount payable is collected by the State tax authority, which immediately transfers it to the State health insurance agency?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
Patrick J. Byrne, certify that:
  1. I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Intermec, Inc.; and
   2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.
    /s/ Patrick J.
Byrne
 Patrick
J. Byrne
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
  March
31, 2010
# CE2004088EN.01031201.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/312 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/312

---

(2004/C 88 E/0317)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0046/03

by Pasqualina Napoletano (PSE) and Giovanni Pittella (PSE) to the Commission

(21 January 2003)

Subject:   Crisis in Venezuela

Subject:

Venezuela is being torn apart by a dramatic political and social crisis, which includes both organised violence on the part of the most radical groups close to the government of President Chavez and acts on the part of extremist opposition groups which are little short of a coup d'état. The situation is a real threat to democracy and freedom in a country where a very large section of the population is of European origin (including a large community of Italian origin).

What steps have already been taken (and with what results) and what further action is planned to ensure that the European Union can help to enhance the role of the international community and institutions, which is of decisive importance for the purposes of overcoming the crisis in the context of political negotiation and respect for democracy and the Constitution?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(13 February 2003)

(13 February 2003)

On the current crisis in Venezuela, the Union has issued three declarations in 2002, after the April coup, on 9 October and on 23 December. In them, the Union expressed its full support for the Organisation of American States (OAS) efforts to facilitate a national dialogue between the Government of Venezuela and the Coordinadora Democrática (organised opposition) as well as other relevant sectors of society. These declarations, as others issued by other countries, regions and international institutions, have probably had a positive impact in that they encouraged the Venezuelan population to abstain from violence, and made it clear to the most radical elements in the opposition that the international community would not tolerate any non-democratic or non-constitutional solutions.

The OAS efforts have, however, as yet not produced any concrete results in resolving the political crisis. The parties in conflict appear to be unable to engage in a constructive dialogue to solve the situation. A new initiative to help address the conflict, the creation of a ‘Group of Friends’, was launched in Quito on 15 January 2003. Two Member States are part of the group, Spain and Portugal, whose creation the Union welcomed in a Declaration of 21 January 2003. The Group of Friends will work in support of the OAS efforts.

Furthermore, the Commission has approved a project of financial assistance to the OAS in its efforts to implement possible agreements reached between the parties of the OAS mediated dialogue. In addition to facilitating the ongoing dialogue, it has three main components: support for free and fair elections; investigation of the events of April 2002 (failed coup); and disarming the civilian population.

---
# C_2023155EN.01007101.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/71

---

Action brought on 9 March 2023 — Meta Platforms Ireland v European Data Protection Board

(Case T-128/23)

(2023/C 155/88)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: H.-G. Kamann, F. Louis, M. Braun and A. Vallery, lawyers, P. Nolan, B. Johnston, C. Monaghan and D. Breatnach, Solicitors, D. McGrath, E. Egan McGrath and H. Godfrey, Barristers)

Defendant: European Data Protection Board (EDPB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the EDPB’s Binding Decision 4/2022 on the dispute submitted by the Irish SA on Meta Platforms Ireland Limited and its Instagram service (Art. 65 GDPR) adopted on 5 December 2022, in total or, in the alternative, in its relevant parts, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the EDPB’s Binding Decision 4/2022 on the dispute submitted by the Irish SA on Meta Platforms Ireland Limited and its Instagram service (Art. 65 GDPR) adopted on 5 December 2022, in total or, in the alternative, in its relevant parts, and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the EDPB exceeded its competence under Article 65 GDPR. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the EDPB exceeded its competence under Article 65 GDPR.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the EDPB infringed Article 6(1)(b) GDPR by interpreting the concept of contractual necessity overly narrowly and applying this incorrect legal standard based on an incorrect interpretation of Meta Ireland’s Terms of Use. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the EDPB infringed Article 6(1)(b) GDPR by interpreting the concept of contractual necessity overly narrowly and applying this incorrect legal standard based on an incorrect interpretation of Meta Ireland’s Terms of Use.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the EDPB infringed the right to good administration as enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the EDPB infringed the right to good administration as enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging that that the EDPB failed to act as an impartial body. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that that the EDPB failed to act as an impartial body.

| 5. | Fifth plea in law, alleging that the EDPB violated Article 83 GDPR and various underlying principles governing the determination of fines under the GDPR. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Fifth plea in law, alleging that the EDPB violated Article 83 GDPR and various underlying principles governing the determination of fines under the GDPR.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CNOTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    132,182
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               357,670
<PP&E>                                       4,799,527
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,392,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,200,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,244,879
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,311
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,196,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,200,029
<SALES>                                      4,890,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,890,856
<CGS>                                        4,841,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,841,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               289,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (302,503)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (302,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (302,503)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>