alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-05-0388-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 15, 2006

______________________________ MICHAEL S. BLAKEMORE, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLE E

_________________________________ FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUB BOCK COUNTY; NO. 2000-435180; HONORABL E CECIL G. PURYE AR, JUDG E

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORAND UM OPINION Pursuantto a plea bargain, appellant, Michael S . Blakemore, pled nolo contende re to insurance fraud, a s tate jail felony. On December 4, 2001, the trial court deferred adjudication of g uilt and appellant was placed on five ye ars of community supervision. After he pled true to multiple violations, on February 2, 2004, the court granted the State’s1 The September 15, 2005 judgment is identified in the record as “ Judgment

Adjudicating Guilt Af

ter H ear ing.” However, the record also contains a judgment adjudicating guilt signed April 21, 2004. We express n o opinion on t he validity of the Septembe r 15 judgm ent. 2 motion to procee d with ad ju dicat ion of gu ilt and s entenced appella nt to two years c on finement, probated in favor of five years of co mmunity su pervisio n. The co urt subsequentlyrevoked appellant’s community supervision o n Se ptember 15, 2005, and sentenced him to one year of confinement in a state jail faci lity. 1 Bya singl e point of error, appellant

contends

th e evi dence was insufficient to sustain his conviction for a state jail felony. However, the State maintains he cannot attack his conviction on direct a ppeal. We agree and dismiss for want of jurisdiction. Although article 42.12, se ction 5(b ) of the C ode of Cr iminal P rocedure perm its a n appeal from assessment of punishment after an adjudication of guilt, it isstill necessa ry to timelyfile a notice of

appeal. A defendant must file a written notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within 30 days after the date sentence is imposed
. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c) & 26.2(a)(1 ). The Rul es of App ellateProcedu re provid e a fiftee n-day wi ndow in which to file the notice of appeal if it is accom panied b y a motio n for extension of time. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. This Court is without jurisdiction to address the merits of an appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal if it is not timel y perfecte d. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2 d 208, 21 0 (Tex.C r.App. 19 98).2 Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
. See Tex. Cod e Crim. Proc. Ann . art. 11.0 7, § 3 (Ve rnon 200 5). 3 The record indicates appellant filed his notice of appeal on Octob er 26, 2005. Therefore, appella nt’s inte nt to appeal the April 21, 2004 conviction, which he refers to as the revocation of his deferred adjudication, is untimely and does not invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. 2 Appellant’s point of error is overruled. Accordingly, we dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam Do not publish.
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.1



Summary of Viacom Inc. Compensation for Outside Directors 
(Effective as of May 18, 2016) 
Cash Compensation 
 
		
	•
	The Vice Chair of the Board receives an annual retainer of $200,000, and each other outside director receives an annual retainer of $100,000, in each case payable in equal installments quarterly in advance. 




		
	•
	The Chairs of the Audit and Compensation Committees each receive an annual retainer of $20,000, payable in equal installments quarterly in advance, and the members of those Committees receive a per meeting attendance fee of $2,000. 




		
	•
	The Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee receives an annual retainer of $15,000, payable in equal installments quarterly in advance, and the members of that Committee receive a per meeting attendance fee of $1,500.




Outside directors may elect to defer their cash compensation under the Viacom Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors. 
Equity Compensation 


		
	•
	Each outside director receives an annual grant on January 31st of each year of Restricted Share Units (RSUs), the number of which is determined by dividing (i) $175,000 by (ii) the fair market value of one share of Class B Common Stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market (NASDAQ) on the date of grant. 




		
	•
	In addition, the Lead Independent Director receives an annual grant on January 31st of each year of RSUs, the number of which is determined by dividing (i) $50,000 by (ii) the fair market value of one share of Class B Common Stock on NASDAQ on the date of grant.    


		
	•
	All RSUs vest one year from the date of grant and are payable to outside directors in shares of Class B Common Stock upon vesting unless the outside director has previously elected to defer settlement of the RSUs to a future date.  Outside directors are entitled to receive dividend equivalents on the RSUs in the event the Company pays a regular cash dividend on its Class B Common Stock.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1





                                         March 23, 1998


Ms. Kathaleen Mercer
The NPD Group, Inc.
900 West Shore Road
Port Washington, New York  11050-0402

                                                        SENT VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS


Dear Ms. Mercer:

I am writing as a follow-up to our telephone conversation concerning the
reference to NPD Group, Inc. as the source of certain apparel industry
information that was included in the Tropical Sportswear Int'l Corporation's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 1997. Attached to this
correspondence is a copy of the Company's Annual Report that includes the
paragraphs where the industry data you provided was quoted. Please signify your
consent for the use of your name associated with this data by signing at the
space provided below. Please return the original of this letter to me in the
enclosed prepaid Federal Express envelope and retain a copy for your own files.

Thank you in advance for your assistance with this matter and if you should have
any questions, please feel free to call me at 813-249-4900, extension 1068.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             /s/ N. Larry McPherson

                                             N. Larry McPherson
                                             Executive Vice President - 
                                             Finance & Operations


THE NPD GROUP, INC.


       /s/ Kathaleen L. Mercer
------------------------------
Signature


       VP, NPD POS
------------------------------
Title


       4/2/98
------------------------------
Date
| COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS(Dollars in thousands) |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                         | For the three months ended |
|                                                         | March 31, 2002 | March 31, 2001 |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                         | Income | WeightedAverageShares | Per shareAmount | Income | AverageShares | Per shareAmount |
| Basic EPS                                               |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   Income available to common shareholders     | $686 | 1,333,712 | $0.51 | $515 | 1,334,933 | $0.39 |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Effect of dilutive securities                           |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   Options                                     |  | 39,372 |  |  | 22,765 |  |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Diluted EPS                                             |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   Income available to common shareholders     | $686 | 1,373,085 | $0.50 | $515 | 1,357,698 | $0.38 |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Thomas Mitchell BROOKS v. James U. DOWNS, Superior Court Judge, Swain County.

No. 173P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Thomas M. Brooks, Pro Se.

*902Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 17th day of April 2008 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Swain County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
# Sheri Woodfin District Cieri? • Tom Green County 112 W. Beauregard San Angelo, Texas 76903-5850 325-659-6579 Fax: 325-659-3241

August 3, 2015 Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Third Court ofAppeals P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Tx 78711-2547

RE: 03-15-0339-CV Ben Melton vs. CU Member's Mortgage, a Division ofColonial Savings, F.A., First Western Title Co. and Bob Mims

Dear Mr. Kyle

The Clerk's record was due on July 31, 2015 on the above referenced case. As of today, the fee forthe record of$136.50 has not been paid. Upon receipt ofthe fees the record will be prepared and forwarded toyour court.

### Sincere~ .

# J/'

# ~·~ Vicki Vines, Chief Deputy District Clerk Tom Green County

cc: Gregory Sherwood
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 490/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 490/2014 of 12 May 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 490/2014                     

# of 12 May 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



The undersigned officers of Active Power, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:



|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Joseph F. Pinkerton, IIIJoseph F. Pinkerton, IIIChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2005/s/ John PenverJohn PenverVice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2023338EN.01004501.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/45

---

Action brought on 16 August 2023 — Freistaat Bayern v EUIPO — BSGE (Neuschwanstein)

(Case T-506/23)

(2023/C 338/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Freistaat Bayern (represented by: M. Müller, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BSGE Bundesverband Souvenir Geschenke Ehrenpreise eV (Veitsbronn, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Neuschwanstein’ — EU trade mark No 15 687 353

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 May 2023 in Case R 1013/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  
  
<ARTICLE> 5  
<LEGEND>  
This schedule contains summary financial information 
extracted from the Registrant's unaudited interim financial 
statements for the six months ended June 30, 1997 and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to those financial statements.  
</LEGEND>  
<CIK> 0000930364  
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST IV  
         
<S>                                       <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997  
<CASH>                                      20,371,752  
<SECURITIES>                                 7,638,584<F1>  
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,320,074  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0  
<INVENTORY>                                    383,810  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,088,736  
<PP&E>                                      13,158,041  
<DEPRECIATION>                                 597,297  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,338,803  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,147,862  
<BONDS>                                      5,174,028  
<COMMON>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,313,325  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,338,803  
<SALES>                                      3,245,273  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,429,773  
<CGS>                                        2,368,847  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,368,847  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               847,126  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             301,194  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,008,845<F2> 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,008,845  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,008,845  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 2,115.87  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 2,115.87  
  
<FN>  
<F1>Investment in hydroelectric project partnership and corporation 
accounted for on equity method in financial statements.  
<F2>After deduction of minority interest in Providence Project 
earnings of $228,385.
</FN>  
          

</TABLE>
# C_2023035EN.01007601.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/76

---

Action brought on 5 December 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — Road Star Group (Footwear)

(Case T-757/22)

(2023/C 35/96)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Road Star Group (Nupaky, Czech Republic)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 4 160 273-0015

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 September 2022 in Case R 1900/2021–3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 6(1)(a) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
STATE v. KARGES.

No. COA07-1339.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Gaston (07CRS9040).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         478,091
<SECURITIES>                                28,142,170
<RECEIVABLES>                                  488,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               676,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,851,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          507,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,344,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,851,912
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               365,560
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                343,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                   343,181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            343,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   343,181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>