alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Justin Henry B., an Infant. St. Vincent's Services, Inc., Respondent; Tawana C., Appellant. *370(Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Fantaisha Niasha Patricia C., an Infant. St. Vincent's Services, Inc., Respondent; Tawana C., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[799 NYS2d 274]

In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from two orders of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), both dated January 16, 2004 (one as to each child), which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, terminated her parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject children to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the orders of disposition are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner met its burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that, despite its diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, the mother permanently neglected her children by failing substantially and continually to maintain contact with them or plan for their future although she was physically and financially able to do so *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; *Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136, 142-143 [1984]; *cf. Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368 [1984]).

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court’s prior order, following a permanency hearing, that the goal for the children would remain reunification rather than adoption, did not collaterally estop the petitioner from offering proof of permanent neglect. The time period at issue at the permanency hearing which resulted in the prior order was different from the one at issue in the instant proceedings *(see Matter of Jesus II.,*249 AD2d 846, 847 [1998]), and the petitioner, therefore, did not have a full and fair opportunity at the permanency hearing to prove the allegations contained in its termination petitions *371
      *(see Kaufman v Eli Lilly & Co.,*65 NY2d 449 [1985]; *cf. Matter of Julian P.H.,*177 Misc 2d 176 [1998], *affd sub nom. Matter of Commissioner of Admin, of Children’s Servs. of City of N.Y.,*254 AD2d 416 [1998]).

In addition, the Family Court properly gave only minimal weight to the testimony of the mother’s expert witness. While the witness may have been qualified as an expert in social work, her testimony was almost exclusively concerned with whether the petitioner’s plan for the mother was adequate given her means and limitations. Inasmuch as such testimony addressed the dispositive legal issue of whether diligent efforts were sufficient, it “infringed upon the function of the court and certainly did not warrant a result favorable to [the mother]” *(see Matter of Michael Anthony Vincent J.,*253 AD2d 619, 622 [1998]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.
BRYANT v. TAYLOR KING FURNITURE.

No. COA07-720.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 463589).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OraLabs Holding Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Gary H. Schlatter,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                   /s/ Gary H. Schlatter
                   ------------------------------------------
                   Gary H. Schlatter, Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  April 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,293
<SECURITIES>                                    18,363
<RECEIVABLES>                                      214
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,545
<PP&E>                                           2,049
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,808
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,672
<SALES>                                            242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   242
<CGS>                                              709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,483
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (41)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,570)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,570)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,570)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics).

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Threat Reduction Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on Thursday, November 3, 2005, at the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA), and on Friday, November 4, 2005 in the Pentagon, Washington, DC.

The mission of the Committee is to advise the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics) on technology security, combating weapons of mass destruction, chemical and biological defense, transformation of the nuclear weapons stockpile, and other matters related to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's mission. 

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix II), it has been determined that this Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly the meeting will be closed to the public.

      ( print page 51759)    

# DATES:

Thursday, November 3, 2005, (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) and Friday November 4, 2005, (8 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.)

# ADDRESSES:

Institute for Defense Analyses, Board Room, 4850 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia and the USD (AT&L) Conference Room (3D1019), the Pentagon, Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Lieutenant Colonel Don Culp, USAF, Defense Threat Reduction Agency/AST, 8725 John J. Kingman Road MS 6201, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6201. Phone: (703) 767-5717.

Dated: August 25, 2005.

Jeannette Owings-Ballard,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 05-17315 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 412 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 412

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2007

 Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Obama) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANE EVANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lane Evans Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lane Evans 
Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32









CERTIFICATION




By
signing below, each of the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in
his or her capacity as an officer of LSB Financial Corp. (the “Registrant”) that
(i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in
this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results
of operations of the Registrant for such period.









Date:
            November
      13, 2008
            /s/
            Randolph
      F. WilliamsRandolph
      F. WilliamsPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            November
      13, 2008
            /s/
            Mary
      Jo DavidMary
      Jo DavidVice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer







A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to LSB Financial Corp. and will be retained by LSB Financial
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                    CNA SURETY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          COMPANY                               INCORPORATED IN
                          -------                               ---------------
<S>                                                             <C>
CNA Surety Corporation......................................         Delaware
Capsure Holdings Corp. (f/k/a Nucorp, Inc.).................         Delaware
  Capsure Financial Group, Inc. ............................         Oklahoma
     (f/k/a/ Nucorp Energy of Oklahoma, Inc.)
       NI Acquisition Corp. ................................            Texas
       SI Acquisition Corp. ................................            Texas
          Surewest Financial Corp. .........................     South Dakota
            Surety Bonding Company of America...............     South Dakota
            Western Surety Company..........................     South Dakota
               Troy Fain Insurance, Inc. ...................          Florida
       Universal Surety Holding Corp. ......................            Texas
          Universal Surety of America.......................            Texas
</TABLE>
STATE v. VINCENT.

No. COA07-1512.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (06CRS89568).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
BAKER v. BAKER.

No. COA07-1175.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 3, 2008.

Certification Date June 23, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (06CVD2086).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed in part, remanded in part.
Exhibit 10.2*

**SUMMARY OF2006 CASH AND EQUITY INCENTIVE COMPENSATION  ARRANGEMENTS**
     OnJanuary 24, 2006, Eden Bioscience's Board of  Directors approved a 2006 cash and equityincentive  compensation arrangement for Dr. Rhett A. Atkins, our  President and ChiefExecutive Officer.  The arrangement  provides for cash and equity awards based on theachievement  of specified annual net revenue goals for the year ending  December 31,2006.  Under the arrangement, Mr. Aktkins can  earn a cash bonus of between $54,000, ifthe minimum revenue  goal is achieved, and $90,000, if the maximum revenue goal  isachieved.  In addition, Mr. Aktkins will be granted fully  vested stock options topurchase between 16,666 shares of  our common stock, if the minimum revenue goal isachieved,  and 41,666 shares if the maximum revenue goal is achieved.  Stock optionsgranted under the arrangement will be granted  pursuant to our Amended and Restated 2000Stock Incentive  Plan and will have an exercise price equal to the fair  market value ofour common stock on the date of grant.

     OnMarch 14, 2006, the Board of Directors added Dr.  Zhongmin Wei, our Vice President andChief Science Officer,  and Bradley S. Powell, our Vice President and Chief  FinancialOfficer, to the 2006 cash and equity incentive  compensation arrangement.  Under thearrangement, Dr. Wei  and Mr. Powell will each be awarded 50% of the cash and  equityawards, if any, granted to Dr. Atkins, based on  achievement of the same annual netrevenue goals for 2006.

- 21 -
EXHIBIT 10.25.2


                  Schedule of Omitted Documents in the Form of
                   Exhibit 10.25, including Material Detail in
                 Which Such Documents Differ From Exhibit 10.25


         Stock Option Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2002, with the Registrant.

         The form of document listed above does not differ in material detail
from the form of Exhibit 10.25 except with respect to the following:

          Name                 Number of Options              Exercise Price
        ---------------        -----------------              --------------
        Edward J. Casey          10,000                          $0.76

        Harold Paul              10,000                          $0.76

        John Milcetich           10,000                          $0.76
#### Ransom Dunning et al., Respondents, v Paul-Marie Jerome Brisson, M.D., Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 8]

*272Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered September 2, 2004, which, upon reargument, vacated a prior order, same court and Justice, entered December 10, 2003, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and restored the action to the calendar, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the summary judgment motion to the extent of dismissing plaintiff Linda Dunning’s derivative claim, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

After defendant performed surgery on plaintiff Ransom Dunning in July 1999, plaintiff had a postoperative consultation with defendant on August 5, 1999. Plaintiff’s next, and last, visit with defendant was on November 22, 1999. In view of the notation in defendant’s records that the November 22, 1999 visit was *“a*follow up consultation,” among other things, an issue of fact exists as to whether the November 22 visit continued plaintiffs prior course of treatment, thereby extending the toll of the statute of limitations under the continuous treatment doctrine *(see*CPLR 214-a; *Borgia v City of New York,*12 NY2d 151, 155 [1962]), or, alternatively, resumed a physician-patient relationship that had terminated with the August 5, 1999 meeting. However, application of the continuous treatment doctrine does not toll the statute of limitations with respect to the derivative claim, and we therefore modify as indicated *(Wojnarowski v Cherry,*184 AD2d 353, 354-355 [1992]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
IN RE C.M.B.

No. COA08-71.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Alamance (06JA102).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE Dytania PAYNE-EL.

No. 43P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of January 2008 by Defendant for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of April 2008."
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00406 -CV In re K elly Stinson ORIG IN A L PR OC E E D IN GFR OM T R A V IS C OU N T Y ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Kelly Stins on petitioned the Court for a writ of m andamus to compel the district court to act on his motion to protec t documents i n State custody that are the subject of pe nding litig ation. Counsel for the B oard of

Pardons and Paroles, the rea l pa rty in interest, has a ssured the Court that the documents are either not subject t o or are ex empt from the two-year destruction provision of the rec ords re tention schedule. Counsel a ssures the Court that all docume nts in question wi ll be maintained. With thi s assura nce, the petition for writ of m andamus is denied. SeeTe x. R. A pp . P. 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ Diane H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Waldrop a nd Henson Filed: August 14, 2007
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CALAIS RESOURCES INC. Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
Principal Executive Officer To my knowledge: the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May
31, 2004, containing financial statements for the year then ended, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934;
and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Calais
Resources Inc. for the periods presented. September 13, 2004 /s/ Thomas S. HendricksThomas S. Hendricks, Chief ExecutiveOfficer
 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
Principal Financial Officer To my knowledge: the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May
31, 2004, containing financial statements for the year then ended, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934;
and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Calais
Resources Inc. for the periods presented. September 13, 2004 /s/ Matt WittMatt Witt, Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Wednesday, September 21, 2005.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Derivatives Clearing Organization Review.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-17901 Filed 9-6-05; 11:08 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Kevan Matthew TANTE.

No. 148P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Carlos Mahoney, Durham, for Tante.

Isaac Avery, III, Special Counsel, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*276*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of April 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony DOVE.

No. 131P01-7.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Anthony Dove, Pro Se.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th day of April 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
# C_2023235EN.01000702.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/7

---

Order of the President of the Court of 24 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — LN v Société Air France SA

(Case C-162/23, (1) Air France)

(Air transport - Right to re-routing - Passenger requesting re-routing with no temporal link with the original travel plan)

(2023/C 235/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LN

Defendant: Société Air France SA

Operative part of the order

Case C-162/23 is removed from the Register of the Court.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 16.3.2023.

---