alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32**








CERTIFICATION
  By
        signing below, each of the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        in
        his or her capacity as an officer of LSB Financial Corp. (the “Registrant”) that
        (i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
        in
        this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
        financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results
        of operations of the Registrant for such period.
  
  Date:
              August
                  14, 2007
              
              /s/
                Randolph
                F. WilliamsRandolph
                  F. WilliamsPresident
                  and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
              August
                  14, 2007
              
              /s/
                Mary
                Jo DavidMary
                  Jo DavidVice
                  President and Chief Financial
                  Officer
 
  A
        signed original of this
        written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
        acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
        form
        within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
        906,
        has been provided to LSB Financial Corp. and will be retained by LSB Financial
        Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon
        request.
Exhibit 10.45

SIXTH AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT

This Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (this "Sixth Amendment") is made as of the 28 th day of September, 2001 by Mrs. Fields'
Original Cookies, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Borrower"), and LaSalle Bank National Association, a national banking association ("LaSalle").

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, Borrower and LaSalle are all of the parties to that certain Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of February 28, 1998, as amended by that
certain First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of July 31, 1998 (the "First Amendment"), that certain Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as
of April 1, 1999 ("Second Amendment"), that certain Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of February 1, 2000 ("Third Amendment"), that certain Fourth Amendment
to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of April 3, 2000 ("Fourth Amendment"), and that certain Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated as of March 30, 2001
("Fifth Amendment") (the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, together with the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Third Amendment, the Fourth Amendment and the Fifth Amendment, as further
amended, restated, modified or supplemented and in effect from time to time, being herein referred to as the "Loan Agreement"); and

WHEREAS,
Borrower has requested that LaSalle amend the Loan Agreement with respect to certain matters, and LaSalle is agreeable to such request, on and subject to the terms and
conditions set forth herein;

NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement as of the date first set forth above.

| |  | MRS. FIELDS' ORIGINAL COOKIES, INC.,a Delaware Corporation      
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                             
| |  |                                                                 
| |  | LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,a national banking association
| |  | By:                                                             
| |  |
ARCHIE v. LIPSITZ.

No. COA07-1422.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 16, 2008.

Certification Date October 6, 2008.

Appeal from Rowan (07CVS1022).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. MORRISON.

No. COA08-299.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 4, 2008.

Certification Date November 24, 2008.

Appeal from Catawba (07CRS2621, 06CRS50018, 07CRS2041, 07CRS2042, 07CRS2620, 07CRS2622).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Decision of 15 December 2014 correcting the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/154/EU authorising            the placing on the market of (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine salt as a novel food ingredient under Regulation            (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2014) 9452) (Only the Italian text            is authentic) (2014/916/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 15 December 2014

# correcting the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/154/EU authorising the placing on the market of (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic                        acid, glucosamine salt as a novel food ingredient under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council                     

# *(notified under document C(2014) 9452)*

# (Only the Italian text is authentic)

# (2014/916/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel                           foods and novel food ingredients(1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Commission Implementing Decision 2014/154/EU(2) authorises the placing on the market of (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine salt as a novel food ingredient.

(2)The Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/154/EU lays down the specification for (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine                              salt. The Annex contains an error in the specifications. That error should be corrected.

(3)Implementing Decision 2014/154/EU should therefore be corrected accordingly.

(4)The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals,                              Food and Feed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

In the specifications concerning purity of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/154/EU, the entry as regards glucosamine                     assay is replaced by the following:                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision is addressed to Gnosis SpA, Via Lavoratori Autobianchi 1, 20832 Desio (MB), Italy.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

Vytenis Andriukaitis                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

1

OJ L 43, 14.2.1997, p. 1.                           

2

Commission Implementing Decision 2014/154/EU of 19 March 2014 authorising the placing on the market of (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic                              acid, glucosamine salt as a novel food ingredient under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council                              (OJ L 85, 21.3..2014, p. 10).
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1793

___________ James R. Guglielmino, * * Appellant, * * v. * * City of Kansas City, Missouri, * * Appellee, * * Brandon Norwat, Brandon Police * Appeal from the United States Officer; D. Budd, Police Officer, * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Defendants, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Board of Police Commissioners of * Kansas City, Missouri, * * Appellee, * * One Unidentified Kansas City, * Missouri Police Officer; Kelly * Moorhouse, Commissioner, in both * her individual and official capacity, * * Defendants. *

___________ Submitted: September 28, 1999 Filed: October 12, 1999

___________1 TheHonorable D. Brook Bartlett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Western District of Missouri. -2- Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Inthis 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, James R. Guglielmino appeals the district court’s 1 orders granting summary judgment to defendants City of Kansas City, Missouri andthe members of its Board of Police Commissioners, and an earlier order of the court granting the Board judgment on the pleadings. After de novo review, we find the district court’s orders were proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B. A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
----

(2004/C 33 E/037)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0391/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(13 February 2003)

Subject:   Eco-label

The introduction of an eco-label in Regulation (EEC) 880/92 (1), recently amended by Regulation (EC) 1980/2000 (2), is intended to make it easier for consumers to identify environmentally-friendly products which have been officially approved by the EU and to encourage enterprises to develop projects having the necessary specifications. Criteria have now been adopted for 19 categories of product, and in the long term it is intended to establish 35 such categories.

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(16 June 2003)

The Union Eco-label is a benchmark tool to help consumers, whether public or private purchasers, to identify environmentally friendly goods and services on the market. The main aim is to encourage businesses to market greener products which comply with high environmental and performance standards.

In answer to the question about how to encourage enterprises to join the Union Eco-label, it is important to note that the Union Eco-label is now part of a wider approach on Integrated Product Policy (IPP) within the 6th Community Environment Action Programme. Therefore the growth of the Union Eco-label will certainly benefit from the future development of such an environmental policy in terms of sustainable consumption and production.

The Union Eco-label has also adopted a working plan for the period 2002-2004 which seeks to increase significantly the visibility of the scheme. In particular, the Commission together with Member States, acting as the European Union Eco-labelling Board (EUEB), is actively operating to identify effective actions to increase the market penetration of the Union Eco-label, including specific marketing initiatives and a closer co-operation and co-ordination between the Union eco-label and national labelling schemes.

----

(1)OJ L 99, 11.4.1992, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 237, 21.9.2000, p. 1.

(3)  Estimated data for 2002 based on a 50 % increase in turnover compared to 2001.

----
EXHIBIT 4.13

                             AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT


     THIS AMENDMENT is as of March 31, 2005, by and between (i) Tefron Ltd.
("Tefron" or the "Company"), an Israeli company, and (ii) Leber Partners, L.P.,
a limited partnership ("Investor").

     WHEREAS, Tefron and the Investor are parties to a Share Purchase Agreement,
dated as of March 3, 2004 (the "Original Agreement") and desire to amend Section
1(b) thereof.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to amend the Original Agreement in
the manner described in this Amendment:

1.   AMENDMENT. The term "Additional Shares", defined in the last paragraph of
     Section 1(b) of the Original Agreement, shall be amended to mean an
     aggregate of 201,613 shares, which is the number of shares representing the
     sum of US $ 806,452 at a price of US$4 per share.

2.   OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS. Unless expressly set forth herein, all other
     terms and conditions set forth in the Original Agreement shall remain in
     full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have signed this Amendment as of the date first
hereinabove set forth.


/s/ Gil Rozen,
/s/ Yos Shiran                    /s/ Zvi Limon
--------------                    -------------
TEFRON LTD.                       LEBER PARTNERS, L.P.
By: Yos Shiran, Gil Rozen         By: Zvi Limon, director of Leber Limited,
Title: CEO, CFO                   Title: General Partner of Leber Partners, L.P
STATE of North Carolina v. Sabe Murdock BUZBEE.

No. 338P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Sabe Murdock Buzbee, pro se.

Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th day of July 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
# C_2023321EN.01006901.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/69

---

Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Certinvest v EUIPO — Kiddinx Studios (Tina)

(Case T-444/23)

(2023/C 321/78)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Certinvest SRL (Păntăşeşti, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kiddinx Studios GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Tina — Application for registration No 18 271 155

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 May 2023 in Case R 1979/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in the sense of allowing the appeal filed by the applicant against the decision of the Opposition Division and, consequently, oblige EUIPO to continue the registration proceedings for the trade mark at issue for all goods and services. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in the sense of allowing the appeal filed by the applicant against the decision of the Opposition Division and, consequently, oblige EUIPO to continue the registration proceedings for the trade mark at issue for all goods and services.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          ALL-AMERICAN SPORTPARK, INC.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on
Form 10-QSB of All-American SportPark, Inc. for the quarter ending September
30, 2004:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
All-American SportPark, Inc.


Dated:  November 15, 2004




/s/ Ron Boreta
Ron Boreta
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and
Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to All-American SportPark, Inc.
and will be retained by All-American SportPark, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
VI 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 418 

For the relief of Shigeru Yamada. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 29, 2007 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Shigeru Yamada. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHIGERU 

4 YAMADA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Shigeru Yamada shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of that Act or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 418 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Shigeru Yamada 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), Shigeru Yamada shall be considered 

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible 

5 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi6 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date 

7 of enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Shigeru Yamada, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of birth of Shigeru Yamada under section 203(a) 

20 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

21 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail22 able to natives of the country of birth of Shigeru Yamada 

23 under section 202(e) of that Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000785 28-MAY-2014 07:53 AM
BANANA WIND PROPERTIES, LLC v. K & T REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS & LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC.

No. COA07-1360.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CVS5505).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
LYNCH v. PARKS.

No. COA07-698.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Cabarrus (06CVS3357, 01SP286).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                         RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
     CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL MATURO, PRESIDENT, TREASURER, CHIEF FINANCIAL
            OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.,
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Michael Maturo, President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of
Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
          period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: August 8, 2006


                                        By /s/ Michael Maturo
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael Maturo,
                                           President, Treasurer, Chief Financial
                                           Officer and Director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reckson Associates Realty Corp. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-1999
<CASH>                                          43,325
<SECURITIES>                                    10,894
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                       206
<INVENTORY>                                      1,094
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,985
<PP&E>                                       1,009,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                 212,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 918,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,238
<BONDS>                                        769,736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   918,390
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,048
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,063
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    653
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (90)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                563
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (5)
<CHANGES>                                        (515)
<NET-INCOME>                                        43
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>