alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| Name of Subsidiary                 |   | Country of Incorporation |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                               |   |                     |
| Active Power (Switzerland) AG      |   | Switzerland              |
|                               |   |                     |
| Active Power Solutions Limited     |   | United Kingdom           |
|                               |   |                     |
| Active Power (Germany) GmbH        |   | Germany                  |
|                               |   |                     |
| Active Power (Italy) SrL           |   | Italy                    |
|                               |   |                     |
| Active Power (Algeria) SARL        |   | Algeria                  |
|                               |   |                     |
| Active Power (Japan) KK            |   | Japan                    |
|                               |   |                     |
| Active Power (Hong Kong) Limited   |   | Hong Kong                |
|                               |   |                     |
| Active Power (Beijing) Co. Limited |   | China                    |

----
RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST IV
                                Exhibit 99.2
                                ------------
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Christopher  Naunton,  Chief Financial  Officer of Ridgewood  Electric Power
Trust  IV.   (the   "Registrant"),certify,   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 10, 2003

                                       Signature:

                                       /s/ Christopher Naunton
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Christopher Naunton
                                       Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00758

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.A.D.K. and J.B.L.E.

, Children

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 10

- 0616

- CVW

Honorable Melissa Uram

- Degerolami, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal.

SIGNED April 20, 2016.

_____________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Lauren P. Silvernail, hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                  
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 1, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Lauren P. Silvernail                                         
|                  |  |  |  | Lauren P. Silvernail                                             
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate Development

This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Order No. 1409


Approval for Expansion of Subzone 84O, ExxonMobil Corporation 
(Oil Refinery), Baytown, Texas

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Port of Houston Authority, grantee of FTZ 84, has 
requested authority on behalf of ExxonMobil Corporation (ExxonMobil), 
to expand the scope of manufacturing activity conducted under zone 
procedures within Subzone 84O at the ExxonMobil refinery in Baytown, 
Texas (FTZ Docket 46-2004, filed 10/22/2004);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (69 FR 64026, 11/3/2004 and 69 FR 77986, 12/29/04);
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations would be satisfied, and that approval of the 
application would be in the public interest if approval is subject to 
the conditions listed below;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand the scope of manufacturing authority 
under zone procedures within Subzone 84O, is approved, subject to the 
FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec.  400.28, and 
subject to the following conditions:
    1. Foreign status (19 CFR Sec.  146.41, 146.42) products consumed 
as fuel for the petrochemical complex shall be subject to the 
applicable duty rate.
    2. Privileged foreign status (19 CFR Sec.  146.41) shall be elected 
on all foreign merchandise admitted to the subzone, except that non-
privileged foreign (NPF) status (19 CFR Sec.  146.42) may be elected on 
refinery inputs covered under HTSUS Subheadings <greek-i>2709.00.10, 
<greek-i>2709.00.20, <greek-i>2710.11.25, <greek-i>2710.11.45, 
<greek-i>2710.19.05, <greek-i>2710.19.10, <greek-i>2710.19.45, 
<greek-i>2710.91.00, <greek-i>2710.99.05, <greek-i>2710.99.10, 
<greek-i>2710.99.16, <greek-i>2710.99.21 and <greek-i>2710.99.45 which 
are used in the production of:
    -petrochemical feedstocks (examiners report, Appendix ``C'');
    -products for export;
    -and, products eligible for entry under HTSUS <greek-i> 9808.00.30 
and <greek-i> 9808.00.40 (U.S. Government purchases).
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of August 2005.

Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-17827 Filed 9-7-05; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510-DS-S
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Logility, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statement No. 333-62531 on Form S-8 of Logility, Inc. of our reports dated August 8, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Logility, Inc. and Subsidiary as of April 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2005, and related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the April 30, 2005, annual report on Form 10-Kof Logility, Inc. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

August 8, 2005
Letter



  
 Exhibit 10.3

 July 15, 2010 

Christopher Gopal 
 Vice President, WW
Operations and Support Services 
 Dear Chris; 
 As we discussed and agreed, I am approving your request for a personal leave of absence. The leave will take immediate effect and I will assume responsibilities for worldwide operations. I will also grant
use of the severance and benefits clause outlined in your employment letter to allow you to continue your normal biweekly salary and full benefits during this period of absence. 
 In your employment letter you were approved six (6) months of base pay plus six (6) months of COBRA. For each day of your leave, we will deduct one day of salary from your severance benefit and
for each month of leave, we will deduct one month of your COBRA benefit covering medical, dental, and vision. During your absence you will retain the Executive Reimbursement Program benefit; please continue to work with Veritta Wells, HR Director,
regarding reimbursement. 
 During your absence, both building and system access will be removed. Please meet with Veritta Wells today and she
will take you through this process and review any questions regarding benefits. 
 Chris, I am appreciative of your efforts and wish you the
best during this period of absence. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Eric Kelly
	
	Eric Kelly
	 President and CEO


  

									
	 Acceptance:
	  	 /s/ Christopher Gopal
	 		 	Date:	 	7/15/10
		  	Christopher Gopal	 		 		 	

 By signing, I understand and acknowledge the terms of this agreement as outlined above.
SMITHFIELD HOUSING AUTHORITY v. Philip CREECH.

No. 114P07-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 27, 2008.

Philip Creech, Pro Se.

Robert Spence, Jr., Smithfield, for Smithfield Housing Authority.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 656 S.E.2d 735.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of March 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of March 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of March 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Johnston County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of March 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of March 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the orders of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of March 2008."
#### In the Matter of Abigail S., an Infant. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Ransom S. III, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Ransom S. Iv, an Infant. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Ransom S. III, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Shannon S., an Infant. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Ransom S. III, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.)

[800 NYS2d 39]

In three related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from (1) an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County *381(Spinner, J.), entered October 4, 2004, which, after a hearing, found that he sexually abused and neglected his daughter Shannon, and made derivative findings of neglect and abuse as to his daughter Abigail and son Ransom iy and (2) an order of protection of the same court dated October 4, 2004, requiring, inter alia, that visits with the subject children be supervised.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof finding that the father derivatively abused Abigail and Ransom IV; as so modified, the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and it is further,

Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Based upon our review of the record and deferring to the Family Court’s resolution of credibility issues *(see Matter of Antonia QQ.,*1 AD3d 841, 842 [2003]; *Matter of Nichole SS.,*296 AD2d 618, 619 [2002]), we conclude that the Family Court’s determination that the appellant sexually abused his daughter Shannon is supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; *Matter of Nicole V.,*71 NY2d 112, 117 [1987]; *Matter of Jasmine*A., 295 AD2d 504, 505 [2002]; *Matter of Katherine S.,*271 AD2d 538 [2000]; *Matter of Kanisha W,*233 AD2d 325, 326 [1996]).

Further, while a finding of sexual abuse of one child does not, by itself, establish that other children in the household have been derivatively neglected, here, the appellant’s abuse of Shannon evinced a flawed understanding of a parent’s duties and impaired parental judgment sufficient to support Family Court’s findings of derivative neglect of Abigail and Ransom IV *(see Matter of Sabrina M.,*6 AD3d 759, 761 [2004]; *Matter of Jasmine A., supra; Matter of Kanisha W., supra; Matter of James A.,*217 AD2d 961 [1995]).

However, the Family Court erred in finding that the appellant derivatively abused Abigail and Ransom iy since “the evidence that [Shannon] was sexually abused, standing alone, [is] insufficient to support a finding that the other children were abused” *(Matter of Starr H.,*156 AD2d 1025, 1026 [1989]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 531/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 531/2013 of 10 June 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 as regards the system            of import licences for garlic by reason of the accession of Croatia         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 531/2013                     

# of 10 June 2013

# amending Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 as regards the system of import licences for garlic by reason of the accession of Croatia

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty of Accession of Croatia, and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Croatia, and in particular Article 41 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)Commission Regulation (EC) No 341/2007(1) opens and provides for the administration of tariff quotas and introduces a system of import licences and certificates of                              origin for garlic and certain other agricultural products imported from third countries.

(2)Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 draws a distinction between traditional and new importers in respect of traders that                              may apply for import licences for garlic under the tariff quotas that are opened and administered under that Regulation.

(3)In view of the expected accession of Croatia to the Union as from 1 July 2013, transitional rules should be laid down in order                              to allow importers in Croatia to benefit from the import quotas as traditional importers. Those rules should apply only till                              those importers are able to fulfil the existing rules.

(4)Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(5)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common                              Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 341/2007

In Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 341/2007, the following fourth subparagraph is added:

‘For Croatia, for the 2013/2014, 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 import tariff quota periods:                  

point (a) of the first subparagraph shall not apply; and                           

“import into the Union” shall be understood as import from countries of origin other than the Member States of the Union as                                 constituted at 1 July 2013.’                           

## Article 2U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force subject to and on the date of the entry into force of the Treaty of Accession of Croatia.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 90, 30.3.2007, p. 12.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINTON P. FROST,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

BECHETTI, Police Officer, Palo Alto Police

Department; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 15856

D.C. No. 3:16

- cv

- 05883

- RS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2018 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Vinton P. Frost appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a

district court’s dis missal of a complaint as frivolous. Trimble v. City of Santa

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 15856

Rosa , 49 F.3d 583, 584 (9th Cir. 1995). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Frost’s first

amended complaint as frivolous because it has no arguable basis i n law or fact.

See Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 31

- 32 (1992) (discussing the meaning of

“frivolousness” ).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Frost’s motion for

leave to file a second amended complaint because amendment would have been

futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th

Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal without

leave to amend is proper when amendment would be futile).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. (the “Registrant”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/ LEOF. WELLS, IIILeo F. Wells, IIIChief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2011





/s/ DOUGLASP. WILLIAMSDouglas P. WilliamsChief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2011
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Active Power, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David S. Gino, Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15d, as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David S. GinoDavid S. GinoVice President, Chief Operating Officer andChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)March 15, 2005
# C_2023179EN.01001802.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 20 March 2023 — UP CAFFE d.o.o. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske

(Case C-171/23, UP CAFFE)

(2023/C 179/28)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Upravni sud u Zagrebu

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UP CAFFE d.o.o.

Defendant: Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske

Question referred

Does EU law impose an obligation on the national authorities and courts to determine liability for value added tax (and not to refuse a claim for a refund) where the objective facts of the case indicate that VAT fraud has been committed through the creation of a new company, that is to say, by interrupting the continuity of the previous company’s taxable activity, in the case where the taxable person knew, or ought to have known, that it was participating in such an activity, and where, at the time when the chargeable event occurred, national law did not provide for such a determination of liability?

---