alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of Logility, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Logility, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.



|                           |  |                            
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|This 16thday of July,
2007 |  | /s/    J. MICHAEL
EDENFIELD
|                           |  | J. Michael Edenfield       
|                           |  | Chief Executive Officer    

The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Logility, Inc., certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Logility, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification
is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.



|                           |  |                          
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|This 16thday of July,
2007 |  | /s/    VINCENT C.
KLINGES
|                           |  | Vincent C. Klinges       
|                           |  | Chief Financial Officer  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Logility, Inc. and will be retained by Logility,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The information in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be
deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-37207, 333-64135 and 333-54440 of CNA Surety Corporation and subsidiaries on
Forms S-8, filed on October 3, 1997, September 24, 1998, and January 26, 2001,
respectively, of our report dated February 10, 2003, March 12, 2004, as to Note
17 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory
paragraphs relating to the change in accounting for goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets in 2002 and the restatement described in Note
17), appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of CNA Surety Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December
31, 2002.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 12, 2004


                                       75
# C_2023173EN.01003401.xml

| 15.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/34

---

Action brought on 8 March 2023 — Synapsa Med v EUIPO — Gravity Products (Gravity)

(Case T-125/23)

(2023/C 173/44)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Synapsa Med sp. z o.o. (Jelcz Laskowice, Poland) (represented by: G. Kuchta, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gravity Products LLC (New York, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Gravity’ — EU trade mark No 17 982 729

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January 2023 in Case R 923/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the decision of 9 January 2023 of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO by upholding the appeal against the decision of 11 April 2022 declaring the EU word mark GRAVITY ZTUE-017982729 invalid and dismiss the application for a declaration of invalidity. |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the decision of 9 January 2023 of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO by upholding the appeal against the decision of 11 April 2022 declaring the EU word mark GRAVITY ZTUE-017982729 invalid and dismiss the application for a declaration of invalidity.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and of Articles 7(2), 7(3), 16 and 17(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and of Articles 7(2), 7(3), 16 and 17(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Articles 60(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 60(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1094434
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         4549527
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    4701857
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          177075
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            178811
<LOANS>                                       34670629
<ALLOWANCE>                                      89224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                46416088
<DEPOSITS>                                    33698913
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             333770
<LONG-TERM>                                    6327415
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3317
<OTHER-SE>                                     6052673
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                46416088
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1338814
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               167994
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                134951
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1641759
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              736715
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              172718
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           732326
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    15000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 581082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 236011
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      236011
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    161122
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .04
<LOANS-NON>                                      73000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 92249
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    18925
<RECOVERIES>                                       900
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                89224
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              5000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          84224
        

</TABLE>
J. Brian SCOTT, Plaintiff v. Earnest L. ROSS and wife, Joyce H. Ross, and D & G Development Company, LLC, Defendants v. Charles D. Williamson, and Betty A. Williamson, Intervenor-Defendants.

No. 177P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Wendy P. Wilson, Jeffrey A. Batts, Rocky Mount, for Ross, et al.

Ronald E. vonLembke, Jacksonville, for Williamson.

P.C. Barwick, Kinston, for Scott.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th day of April 2008 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
STATE v. JIMENEZ.

No. COA07-400.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 2, 2008.

Certification Date September 22, 2008.

Appeal from Henderson (06CRS51922, 06CRS51959, 06CRS51924, 06CRS51958).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the
General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | August 8, 2008         



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | August 8, 2008
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 22, 2012

s1015 

# Order

October 22, 2012

145236

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145236

COA: 306543

Wayne CC: 90

- 002843

- FC

WILLIAM BEDFORD BROWN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 2, 2012 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
# C_2023329EN.01001901.xml

| 18.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/19

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Nesebar — Bulgaria) — Astoria Management OOD v CW

(Case C-234/23, (1) Astoria Management)

(2023/C 329/27)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 252, 17.7. 2023.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Ernest David RUMPH.

No. 304P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Ernest Rumph, Pro Se.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Counsel, Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of June 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
THURMAN v. COMMISSIONER, NORTH CAROLINA DIV. OF MOTOR VEHICLES.

No. COA07-668.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 20, 2008.

Certification Date June 9, 2008.

Appeal from Scotland (04CVS1020).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
csgs-ex1025br_212.htm



Pages where confidential treatment has been requested are stamped “Confidential Treatment Requested and the Redacted Material has been separately filed with the Commission,” and places where information has been redacted have been marked with (***). 

Exhibit 10.25BR

 

 

SEVENTY-SIXTH AMENDMENT

TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CSG MASTER SUBSCRIBER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

csg SYSTEMS, INC.

AND

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC

 

 

This Seventy-sixth Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made by and between CSG Systems, Inc. (“CSG”) and Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Customer”).  CSG and Customer entered into that certain Amended and Restated CSG Master Subscriber Management System Agreement dated February 9, 2009 (CSG document No. 2298875), as amended (the “Agreement”), and now desire to further amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.  If the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment shall be in conflict with the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control.  Any terms in initial capital letters or all capital letters used as a defined term but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.  Upon execution of this Amendment by the Parties, any subsequent reference to the Agreement between the Parties shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.  Except as amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect according to their terms.  The effective date of this Amendment is the date last signed below (the "Effective Date").  

 

1.   Customer desires to use and CSG agrees to provide Customer with an additional ************ (**) Web Enabled Advanced Customer Service Representative® (Web Enabled ACSR®) licenses pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement.  As a result, for the fees set forth in Schedule F to the Agreement, the number of Customer’s Web Enabled ACSR® licenses shall increase such that the total of Customer’s Web Enabled ACSR® licenses is *** ******** ************ (*****).

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives.

 


		
	
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC (“CUSTOMER”)

 

By: Charter Communications, Inc., its Manager
	
CSG SYSTEMS, INC. (“CSG”)

	
 

 

By: /s/ Mike Ciszek
	
 

 

By:  /s/ Joseph T. Ruble

	
 

Name:  Mike Ciszek
	
 

Name:  Joseph T. Ruble

	
 

Title:  VP, Billing & Collections
	
 

Title:  EVP, CAO & General Counsel

	
 

Date:  7-31-15
	
 

Date:  5 August 2015
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT


This Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into as of October 27, 2010 (the "Effective Date"), by and between Calais Resources, Inc. ("Calais") and David Young ("Young").


WHEREAS,Young has served as the President of Calais since March 2006, and during the last several years Calais was unable to pay Young his full salary and as of August 31, 2010, Calais was indebted to Young in the amount of $454,084 for accrued but unpaid salary.


WHEREAS,each of parties desires to fully settle and resolve all matters relating to the payment of this obligation to Young in accordance with the following terms and conditions; and


WHEREAS,each of the parties has had the full opportunity to evaluate and enter into this Agreement as their free and voluntary act with full knowledge of the binding and conclusive nature of this Agreement;


NOW, THEREFORE,Calais and Young, in consideration of the releases and agreements contained below, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, agree to a full and final compromise and settlement of the outstanding amount due to Young in accordance with the following terms and conditions:


1. Young agrees to relinquish and waive fifty percent (50%) of the amount owed to him as of August 31, 2010, and to accept as full payment for the remaining 50% ($227,042), the amount of 2,270,420 restricted shares of Calais common stock. Calais agrees to issue to Young within 15 days of the Effective Date of this Agreement, 2,270,420 restricted shares of its common stock as full payment for the 50% of the debt owed to Young.


2. Young agrees that after the execution of this Agreement by both parties and the taking of all needed actions under this Agreement, he is giving up all of his rights to seek the full original amount of accrued and unpaid salary as of August 31, 2010, and he forever releases and waives all rights and claims that he has, had or may have against Calais related solely to the amount owed to him for accrued and unpaid salary through August 31, 2010.
  3. Calais agrees that after the execution of this Agreement, and the taking of all needed actions under this Agreement, it forever releases and waives all rights and claims that it has, had or may have against Young related solely to the obligation it had to pay Young for his accrued and unpaid salary through August 31, 2010.


4. Neither party to this Agreement admits the existence of any wrongdoing.


5. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with Colorado law.












AGREED TO AND ACCEPTEDthis 27th day of October 2010.
  CALAIS RESOURCES, INC.By:  /s/ Thomas S. Hendricks


/s/ David Young___________, Authorized Officer


David Young10-27-2010


10/27/2010
STATE v. Eddie Lamar TAYLOR.

No. 719A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 26, 2007.

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, William Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for Eddie Taylor.

William Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of April 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Taylor) shall have up to and including the 30th day of May 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of April 2007."
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

607 

KA 15-00124 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALEX S. DUMBLETON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (GARY M. PHILLIPS OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (SHIRLEY A. GORMAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C.

Noonan, J.), rendered November 13, 2014. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the first

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law 

§ 215.51 [b] [v]), defendant contends that County Court erred in

enhancing his sentence based on a violation of the plea agreement

without first conducting a hearing pursuant to People v Outley (80

NY2d 702). Although defendant’s contention survives his valid waiver

of the right to appeal (see People v Scott, 101 AD3d 1773, 1773, lv

denied 21 NY3d 1019), defendant did not preserve that contention for

our review inasmuch as “he failed to object to the alleged enhanced

sentence and did not move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment

of conviction on that ground” (People v Epps, 109 AD3d 1104, 1105; see

People v Mills, 90 AD3d 1518, 1518, lv denied 18 NY3d 960), and we

decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion

in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). 

Entered: May 5, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court