alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 719/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 719/2014 of 27 June 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 719/2014                     

# of 27 June 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 June 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gloria D. Carroll, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 777]

Mercure, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Delaware County (Becker, J.), rendered March 23, 2004, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant was charged in an indictment with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree after a search of her home revealed methamphetamines. Following County Court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, waived her right to appeal any issues relating to her conviction or sentence, and signed a written waiver instrument to that effect. Defendant was thereafter sentenced to an agreed-upon term of 1 to 3 years in prison and now appeals.

In light of defendant’s knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver of her right to appeal from all waivable aspects of this case, she is precluded from now challenging the denial of her suppression motion *(see People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; *People v Buchanan,*18 AD3d 1019, 1020 [2005]). Notably, County Court specifically advised defendant during the plea allocution that she was forfeiting her right to suppress any evidence by entering the plea, and defendant indicated that she understood. Moreover, inasmuch as her argument does not impact the voluntariness of her guilty plea, defendant’s valid waiver of appeal also forecloses her claim that defense counsel’s failure to advise the People of her intention to testify before the grand jury amounted to a denial of the effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Sayles,*292 AD2d 641, 643 [2002], *lv denied*
      *58798 NY2d 681 [2002]; *cf. People v Grant,*294 AD2d 671, 672 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 730 [2002]; *see generally People v Steed,*17 AD3d 928, 929 [2005]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
MORRISON v. VAUGHAN.

No. 400P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of April 2008 by Plaintiff for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
# C_2023045EN.01003101.xml

| 6.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/31

---

Action brought on 21 December 2022 — Quatrotec Electrónica v EUIPO — Woxter Technology (WOXTER)

(Case T-792/22)

(2023/C 45/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Quatrotec Electrónica, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, J. Rodríguez-Fuensalida y Carnicero, P. Ramells Higueras, A. Figuerola Moure and P. Muñoz Moreno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Woxter Technology Co. Ltd (Causeway Bay, Hong Kong, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark WOXTER — EU trade mark No 3 217 031

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 September 2022 in Case R 0323/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council was erroneously applied in the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council was erroneously applied in the contested decision;

| — | order the revocation of EU trade mark No 3 217 031 WOXTER (figurative mark) in respect of all the goods and services in Classes 9, 37 and 39; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the revocation of EU trade mark No 3 217 031 WOXTER (figurative mark) in respect of all the goods and services in Classes 9, 37 and 39;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs associated with these proceedings, including the representation costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs associated with these proceedings, including the representation costs incurred by the applicant.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
WAKE CARES, INC., et al. v. BOE, et al.

No. 230PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Robert N. Hunter, Jr., Greensboro, for Wake Care, Inc., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of June 2008 by Defendants to Deny Petition for Writ of Supersedeas:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."

MARTIN, J., recused.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C.

                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement Number 333-75081 (dated March 24, 1999 on Form S-8) of Mystic
Financial, Inc., of our report dated July 23, 1999, except for Note 17 as
to which the date is September 8, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-k of Mystic Financial, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 1999.


                                       /s/ Wolf & Company, P.C.

Boston, Massachusetts
September 27, 1999
STATE v. WHITESIDE.

No. COA07-892.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Guilford (05CRS96152).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 768/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 768/2014 of 11 July 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for alfonsinos in EU and international            waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Spain         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 768/2014                     

# of 11 July 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for alfonsinos in EU and international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII                        and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Spain                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 1262/2012(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 1262/2012 of 20 December 2012 fixing for 2013 and 2014 the fishing opportunities for EU vessels                              for certain deep-sea fish stocks (OJ L 356, 22.12.2012, p. 22).
# C_2023252EN.01002201.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 12 April 2023 — AFAÏA v Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO)

(Case C-228/23, AFAÏA)

(2023/C 252/25)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AFAÏA

Defendant: Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO)

Party to the proceedings: Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Annex II to Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1165 of 15 July 2021, (1) which was adopted to implement Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018, (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the concept of factory farming contained therein is equivalent to that of landless livestock production? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Annex II to Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1165 of 15 July 2021, (1) which was adopted to implement Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018, (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the concept of factory farming contained therein is equivalent to that of landless livestock production?

| 2. | If the concept of factory farming is distinct from the concept of landless livestock production, what criteria must be used to determine whether a livestock holding must be categorised as factory farming within the meaning of Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2021/1165? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the concept of factory farming is distinct from the concept of landless livestock production, what criteria must be used to determine whether a livestock holding must be categorised as factory farming within the meaning of Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2021/1165?

---

(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1165 of 15 July 2021 authorising certain products and substances for use in organic production and establishing their lists (OJ 2021 L 253, p. 13).

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 (OJ 2018 L 150, p. 1).

---
Exhibit










 Amendment to Employment Agreement
(Bill Katherman)




This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of May 2, 2016, by and between Fox Factory Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Bill Katherman, an individual (“Executive”), amends that certain Employment Agreement dated as of February 20, 2014 by and between the Company and Executive (the “Original Agreement”) and shall be effective immediately (the “Effective Date”). All terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Original Agreement.
RECITALS


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend certain provisions of the Original Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises and the respective mutual agreements contained herein, the parties to this Amendment agree as follows:
Section 1.     Amendments.
(a)    The last sentence of Section (3)(a) of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
“The Base Salary will be reviewed on an annual basis by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee") and may be increased (or decreased as part of substantially similar reductions applicable to all executives) from time to time, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.”
(b)    The third sentence Section 3(b) of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“The term “Executive’s Base Salary” means Executive’s actual Base Salary, exclusive of any other compensation received by Executive regardless of form, in effect as of the date of the Performance Bonus is calculated.”
Section 2.    Effect on Original Agreement.  On and after the Effective Date, each reference in the Original Agreement to “this letter”, “hereunder”, “hereof”, “herein” or words of similar import shall mean and be a reference to the Original Agreement as amended hereby.  Except as specifically modified by the terms of this Amendment, all of the terms, provisions, covenants, warranties and agreements contained in the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified.
Section 3.    Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be construed under and shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.  
Section 4.    Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Amendment and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first above written.













	
	
	THE  COMPANY
Fox Factory Holding Corp.,
  a Delaware corporation

	





  By: /s/ Larry Enterline
  Name: Larry Enterline
  Title:  Chief Executive Officer

	 

	THE EXECUTIVE
  

	



  /s/ Bill Katherman
  Bill Katherman
EXHIBIT 14.(A).4

            NOTICE REGARDING LACK OF CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

     The consolidated financial statements of the Registrant for the year ended
December 31, 2001 included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F which are
incorporated by reference into the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No.: 333-111932), have been audited by Luboshitz Kasierer
Arthur Andersen, independent public accountants ("AA").

     However, after reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain
from Arthur Andersen a reissued audit report with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31,
2001. The Company has filed with this Annual Report on Form 20-F a copy of the
previously-issued audit report dated March 25, 2002 of Arthur Andersen with
respect to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2001.

     This Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into the
Company's registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-111932). After reasonable
efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Arthur Andersen's written consent
to the incorporation by reference of its previously-issued audit reports into
this Annual Report. As a result, Arthur Andersen may not have any liability
under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") for any
untrue statement of a material fact contained in the 2001 financials or any
omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, persons
acquiring securities under those registration statements may be unable to assert
a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
# C_2023173EN.01004001.xml

| 15.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/40

---

Action brought on 28 March 2023 — Dekoback v EUIPO — DecoPac (DECOPAC)

(Case T-166/23)

(2023/C 173/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Dekoback GmbH (Helmstadt-Bargen, Germany) (represented by: V. von Moers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DecoPac, Inc. (Anoka, Minnesota, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark DECOPAC — EU word mark No 160 747

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 January 2023 in Case R 754/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | cancel in full trade mark No 160 747 DECOPAC registered for the other party to the proceedings, DecoPac, Inc. |
| --- | --- |

—

cancel in full trade mark No 160 747 DECOPAC registered for the other party to the proceedings, DecoPac, Inc.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 52 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

---
# C_2022482EN.01002902.xml

| 19.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 482/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 482/29

---

Action brought on 3 November 2022 — IP v Commission

(Case T-669/22)

(2022/C 482/39)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: IP (represented by: J. Martins, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | declare the present action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

| — | annul the contested decisions; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decisions;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety;

| — | order the defendant to pay fair and adequate compensation. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay fair and adequate compensation.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action brought against the European Commission’s decision of 18 January 2022 to impose against IP the disciplinary sanction of termination without notice of his employment contract, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of sound administration and of the obligation to state reasons.

Second plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.

---
Order entered January 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00881-CV

OHIO GRAVY BISCUIT, INC. AS TRUSTEE FOR THE WOODHAVEN 

DRIVE 1401 LAND TRUST, Appellant

V.

NRZ PASS-THROUGH TRUST X, US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 

AS TRUSTEE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-04848-2019

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this appeal contained certain errors. On January 6, 

2021, a corrected clerk’s record was filed. To avoid confusion, we STRIKE the 

original clerk’s record filed November 5, 2020. The appeal shall proceed on the 

January 6th corrected record. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC.                                        FINANCIAL CONTROL

12855 N. OUTER FORTY DRIVE
MS 822
ST. LOUIS, MO 63141


          As of and for the year ended  December  31, 1997,  Citicorp  Mortgage,
          Inc.  (an  indirect   wholly  owned   subsidiary   of  Citicorp)   and
          subsidiaries (the Company) has complied, in all material respects with
          the minimum  servicing  standards  set forth in the  Mortgage  Bankers
          Association  of  America's  UNIFORM  SINGLE  ATTESTATION  FOR MORTGAGE
          BANKERS.  As of and for this same  period,  the  Company had in effect
          fidelity bond and errors and omissions  policies in the amount of $274
          million.

Very truly yours,




CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC.


By:  /s/  David B. Lowman
          David B. Lowman, Managing Director-
          Mortgage Services

By  /s/  Jim B. Levites           3-4-98
         Jim B. Levites, Managing Director-
         Default Management

By  /s/  Richard G. Thornberry     3-9-98
         Richard G. Thornberry President/Chief Operating Officer

By /s/  Carl Levinson
        Carl L. Levinson, Chairman/Chief Executive Officer


February 20, 1998