alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 28 78

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Mar k Tar go wsk i ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Su pe r 8 Worl dwi de , Inc ., ori gi na ll y na m edas S up er 8 Bat es vi ll e, do in g b us in es s as Supe r 8 B at es vi ll e; Larry W oo ds ; In de pe nd en ce Co un ty, Ark an sa s ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t s Zach ary Lee Rawl in s ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Defe nd an t - Ap pe ll ee Jo hn Does , 1-4 , In t he ir I nd iv idua l an d Off ic ia l Ca pa ci ty; S&S Ho sp it al it y 2, LLC ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t s

__
__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - B at es vi ll e

__
__ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Sep te m

be r 3, 2 01 9 Fi le d: Sep te m

be r 9, 2 01 9 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, GRUEND ER, an d KOBES, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __PER CURI AM.

Mar k Targ ows ki ap pe al s th e jud gm en t en te red by th e di st ric t co ur t fo ll owi ng 1 a jury tri al in hi s 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n a s s e r t i n g Fo ur th Am en dm en t cl ai m s. Hav in g c a r e f

u ll y rev ie wed th e pa rti es ’ arg um en ts on ap pe al , we fin d no ba si s fo r rev ers al

. Se e Pat te rs on v. Ci ty of Omah a , 77 9 F.3 d 79 5, 8 0 1 (8 th Ci r. 20 15 ) (ex pl ai ni ng th at , whe n as se ss in g th e fin di ng s of th e jury, t h i s Co ur t vi ews th e ev id en ce in th e li gh t m os t fav or ab le to th e jury ve rd ic t, as su m in g as tru e al l fact s th at th e pr ev ai li ng pa rty’ s ev id en ce te nd ed to pr ov e); Cr ai g Out do or Adv er t., In c. v. Via co m Out do or

, In c. , 52 8 F.3 d 10 01 , 10 09 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ) (s ta ti ng th at a jury ve rd ic t i s en ti tl ed to ex tre m e de fere nc e an d wil l no t be se t as id e un le ss no reas on ab le jur y co ul d ha ve reac he d th e sa m e ve rd ic t ba se d on th e ev id en ce su bm it te d)

. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Bi ll y Ro y W il so n, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e East ern 1 Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s. -2

-
# C_2023155EN.01006601.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/66

---

Action brought on 3 March 2023 — Insider v EUIPO — Alaj (in Insajderi)

(Case T-119/23)

(2023/C 155/83)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Insider LLC (Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo) (represented by: M. Ketler, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Florim Alaj (Zug, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark in Insajderi — Application for registration No 18 255 587

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 December 2022 in Case R 1152/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant before the General Court for the purposes of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant before the General Court for the purposes of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Violations of procedural rules regarding the proceedings before EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

Violations of procedural rules regarding the proceedings before EUIPO;

| — | Infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the 
Registrant's unaudited interim financial statements for the
six months 
ended September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference 
to those financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000930364
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST IV
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      24,587,994
<SECURITIES>                                13,515,964<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,687,994
<PP&E>                                         469,018<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,707,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,644
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,630,574<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,707,218
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               841,950
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,161,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (319,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (319,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (319,913)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (664.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (664.86)

<FN>
<F1>Investments in power project partnerships.
<F2>Equipment in storage.
<F3>Represents Investor Shares of beneficial interest in 
Trust with capital accounts of $38,642,795 less managing 
shareholder's accumulated deficit of $12,221.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA07-1117.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Gaston (03CRS50595, 03CRS50598, 03CRS50599).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# C_2023296EN.01002401.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 15 June 2023 — Guldbrev AB v Konsumentombudsmannen

(Case C-379/23, Guldbrev)

(2023/C 296/25)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Guldbrev AB

Respondent: Konsumentombudsmannen

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the valuation and purchase of gold from consumers constitute a product (combined product) within the meaning of Article 2(c), (d) and (i) and Article 3(1) of Directive 2005/29 (1) concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market in a situation such as that at issue before the national court? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the valuation and purchase of gold from consumers constitute a product (combined product) within the meaning of Article 2(c), (d) and (i) and Article 3(1) of Directive 2005/29 (1) concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market in a situation such as that at issue before the national court?

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, does the valuation of gold in the situation at issue before the national court constitute a product within the meaning of the directive? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, does the valuation of gold in the situation at issue before the national court constitute a product within the meaning of the directive?

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 42 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 42

  To make improvements to the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. McConnell (for Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following bill; which 
 was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To make improvements to the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Arctic Research and Policy 
Amendments Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. CHAIRPERSON OF THE ARCTIC RESEARCH COMMISSION.

    (a) Compensation.--Section 103(d)(1) of the Arctic Research and 
Policy Act of 1984 (15 U.S.C. 4102(d)(1)) is amended in the second 
sentence by striking ``90 days'' and inserting ``, in the case of the 
chairperson, 120 days, and, in the case of any other member, 90 
days,''.
    (b) Redesignation.--Section 103(d)(2) of the Arctic Research and 
Policy Act of 1984 (15 U.S.C. 4102(d)(2)) is amended by striking 
``Chairman'' and inserting ``chairperson''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 12.(A).2

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Gil Rozen, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 20-F/A (the
     Form 20-F, as amended, called "this report") of Tefron Ltd.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.   disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a.   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial data; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: September 21, 2004

/s/ Gil Rozen
-----------------------
Gil Rozen
Chief Financial Officer
# Council Decision of 25 September 2014 appointing a Bulgarian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions (2014/682/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 25 September 2014

# appointing a Bulgarian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/682/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the BulgarianGovernment,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015. On 10 July 2012, by Council Decision 2012/403/EU(3) Ms Kornelia MARINOVA was appointed as alternate member until 25 January 2015.

(2)An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms                              Kornelia MARINOVA,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term                     of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Ms Madlena BOYADZHIEVA, *Chair of the Municipal Council of the Municipality of Teteven*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

F. Guidi                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.                           

3

Council Decision 2012/403/EU of 10 July 2012 appointing six Bulgarian members and eight Bulgarian alternate members of the                              Committee of the Regions(OJ L 188, 18.7.2012, p. 16).
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 931/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 931/2014 of 28 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 931/2014                     

# of 28 August 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         569,319
<SECURITIES>                                    91,896
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               665,823
<PP&E>                                         249,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,877)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 974,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,773
<BONDS>                                        650,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           945
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   974,417
<SALES>                                         36,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,436
<CGS>                                           13,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,927)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                986
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       986
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
# CE2004078EN.01034301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/343 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/343

---

(2004/C 78 E/0361)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2120/01

by Hans Modrow (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(9 July 2001)

Subject:   Extradition of Milosevic to the Hague tribunal

Subject:

In his recent speech to the European Parliament, President Kostunica of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia declared his commitment to democracy and the rule of law as the way in which his country should develop. What view are we to take of his statement that the Djindjic Government's extradition of former President Milosevic in defiance of the ruling by the Constitutional Court was a violation of his country's laws?

Did the European Union or its Member States promise the Djindjic Government advantages in return for surrendering Milosevic to the tribunal in The Hague?

What are the Commission's views on the danger of a further disintegration of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in this connection?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(26 July 2001)

(26 July 2001)

The Commission, and the Union, warmly welcomed the decision by Belgrade to comply with its international obligations in handing over another indictee (ex-President Milosevic) to the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia (ICTY) at the Hague.

Cooperation with ICTY is an international obligation on all United Nations (UN) Member States and on the signatories of the Dayton Agreement. As such, neither the Union, its Member States, nor the Commission made any promise to any state in relation to their compliance with such international obligations. Cooperation with ICTY, like respect for other international obligations (Dayton, UNSCR 1244, obligations of membership of international organisations) is, furthermore, one of many conditions set out in the Union Stabilisation and Association process and as such has an effect on the development of political relations and the delivery of Community or Member States' assistance. The Commission and the World Bank had already decided to organise a Donors' Conference for the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), held in Brussels on 29 June 2001. Participants welcomed the fact that the Belgrade authorities had decided to comply with their international obligations by transferring Mr Milocevic to the Hague.

Regarding the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Union policy was clearly stated in the Conclusions of the General Affairs Council on 22 January 2001, where the Union urged Belgrade and Podgorica to agree on an open and democratic process, within an overall Federal framework, to decide on a new constitutional arrangement for relations between the components of the Federation, acceptable to all the parties, and reaffirmed that this must be consistent with the internal stability of the FRY and the regional stability of SouthEastern Europe. The Union will continue to develop its relations with the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

---