alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              OCT-01-1999
<CASH>                                         26,843
<SECURITIES>                                   12,911
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                      206
<INVENTORY>                                     1,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               53,393
<PP&E>                                      1,044,529
<DEPRECIATION>                                224,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                926,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          67,827
<BONDS>                                       808,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           63
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,067
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  926,334
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              263,254
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  96,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              124,398
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             45,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (120)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (484)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (5)
<CHANGES>                                       (515)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,004)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.16)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 54896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18134]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Illinois Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that a conference 
call of the Illinois Advisory Committee will convene at 11 a.m. and 
adjourn at 12 p.m., Wednesday, September 28, 2005. The purpose of the 
conference call is to approve the agenda for the briefing, ``Health 
Disparities in Minority Communities in Chicago.''
    This conference call is available to the public through the 
following call-in number: 1-800-473-8694, contact name: James Scales. 
Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to 
the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not 
initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines and 
the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur 
no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line 
connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the 
proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-
8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and 
contact name.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting 
Constance M. Davis, Regional Director of the Midwestern Regional 
Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights at (312) 353-8311, (TDD 312-
353-8362), by 4 p.m. on Tuesday, September 27, 2005.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, September 7, 2005.
Ivy L. Davis,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 05-18134 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 590/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 590/2014 of 2 June 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 590/2014                     

# of 2 June 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 June 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Phillip Thomas BEDDARD v. John ALBRITTON.

No. 357P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

William H. Dowdy, for Albritton.

Herman Gaskins, Washington, for Beddard.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of July 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference; this the 24th day of January 2008."

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 24th day of July 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40227

Summary Calendar

YAKOV ELMAKISS

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

RUTH MARIE ELMAKISS, ELABELL HOLMES, KAREN HUGHES,

MITCHELL COLLINS, JUDGE RANDALL ROGERS, STATE OF TEXAS,

and BULLARD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:07-CV-136)

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

For the reasons stated in the district court and magistrate judge’s wellreasoned opinions and orders, we affirm the judgement of the district court

dismissing the plaintiff’s claims with prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
STATE v. GRIER.

No. COA08-84.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Granville (071FS952).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
# C_2023035EN.01008001.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/80

---

Action brought on 9 December 2022 — Hoffmann v EUIPO — Moldex/Metric (Holex)

(Case T-767/22)

(2023/C 35/100)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Hoffmann GmbH Qualitätswerkzeuge (Munich, Germany) (represented by: D. von Schultz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Moldex/Metric AG & Co. KG (Walddorfhäslach, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark ‘Holex’ — Application No 18 222 083

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 September 2022 in Case R 1248/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, in so far as EU trade mark application No 18 222 083 was refused in respect of the goods ‘respiratory masks, except for artificial respiration’ in Class 9 and ‘Dispensers for ear protection devices; Hearing protection means; Hearing protection means, in particular protective earplugs, protective ear flanges, protective earmuffs (ear protection devices in the form of headphones)’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, in so far as EU trade mark application No 18 222 083 was refused in respect of the goods ‘respiratory masks, except for artificial respiration’ in Class 9 and ‘Dispensers for ear protection devices; Hearing protection means; Hearing protection means, in particular protective earplugs, protective ear flanges, protective earmuffs (ear protection devices in the form of headphones)’;

| — | reject the opposition in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Each of the undersigned officers of Hauppauge Digital, Inc. hereby certify,
pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the  Quarterly  Report of
Hauppauge  Digital,  Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March  31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  as  amended,  and  that  information  contained  in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of Hauppauge Digital, Inc.



Dated:  May 15, 2003                 By: /s/ Kenneth Plotkin
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kenneth Plotkin
                                       Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  May 15, 2003                 By: /s/ Gerald Tucciarone
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Gerald Tucciarone
                                       Chief Financial Officer

     The foregoing  certification  is being furnished solely pursuant to section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 14.(a).1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:

     1.   Previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No 333-111932)
          pertaining to the employee stock option plan and

     2.   Previously filed Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-128847)

of our report dated March 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Tefron included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Tefron for
the year ended December 31, 2005.


                                                /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer

Tel Aviv, Israel                                Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
March 27, 2005                                  A Member of Ernst & Young Global
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7217

LESLIE DEVON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD MOATS; SERGEANT GROVE; OFFICER BREWER,

All of Roxbury Correctional Institution; HEARING OFFICER DUSING,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA95-3568-PJM)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 26, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leslie Devon, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Devon v. Moats, No.

CA-95-3568-PJM (D. Md. June 25 & Aug. 12, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2023321EN.01001801.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/18

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Szczecin — Prawobrzeże i Zachód w Szczecinie — Poland) — PA

(Case C-55/23, (1) Jurtukała (2))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law - Jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions, acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession, and creation of a European Certificate of Succession - Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 - Article 10(1)(a) - Subsidiary jurisdiction - Article 267 TFEU - Obligation to comply with the directions of a higher court)

(2023/C 321/21)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy Szczecin — Prawobrzeże i Zachód w Szczecinie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: PA

Other party: MO

Operative part of the order

Article 10(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession must be interpreted as meaning that the rule of subsidiary jurisdiction laid down by that provision applies only where the habitual residence of the deceased at the time of death was located in a Member State not bound by that regulation or in a third State.

EU law, in particular Article 267 TFEU, must be interpreted as precluding a national court, ruling following the setting aside by a higher court of a decision which it delivered, from being bound, in accordance with national procedural law, by the legal rulings of that higher court, where those rulings are inconsistent with EU law, as interpreted by the Court.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 3.2.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

---
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 933/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 933/2014 of 29 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 933/2014                     

# of 29 August 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# The General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland (Constitution) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2014 No. 218

Education

# The General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland (Constitution) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014

Made

5th August 2014

Coming into operation

8th September 2014

The Department of Education makes the following Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 34 of and paragraph                           1 of Schedule 1 to the Education (Northern Ireland) Order 1998 F1.                        

F1S.I. 1998/1759 (N.I. 13)

## Citation and commencementN.I.

1.  These Regulations may be cited as the General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland (Constitution) (Amendment) Regulations                     (Northern Ireland) 2014 and shall come into operation on 8th September 2014.                  

## Amendment of the General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland (Constitution) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2001N.I.

2.—(1) The General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland (Constitution) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2001 F2 are amended in accordance with paragraphs (2) and (3).                  

(2) In regulation 8 (term of office), in paragraph (1) at the beginning insert “ Subject to regulation 8A, ”.                  

(3) After regulation 8 insert—

### 

“8A.—(1)The term of office of a member whose term of office is due to expire on 14th October 2014 shall be extended for a period of                        one year.                  

(2)Where the term of office has been extended under paragraph (1), the reference to “four years” in regulation 6(5) shall be                        read as if it were a reference to “five years”.”.                  

F2S.R. 2001 No. 288 as amended by S.R. 2009 No. 370

Sealed with the Official Seal of the Department of Education on 5th August 2014.

L.S.

Faustina Graham

 A senior officer of the

 Department of Education

## Explanatory Note

(This note is not part of the Regulations)

These Regulations amend the General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland (Constitution) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2001                        to extend the term of office of Council members whose term would otherwise have ended on 14 October 2014 by a further year.
HASSELL v. BOARD OF EDUCATION.

No. 172A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 7, 2008.

Gary Scarzafava, Assistant Attorney General, John F. Maddrey, Assistant Solicitor General, for Onslow County Board of Education.

George W. Lennon, Raleigh, for NCATL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of December 2007 by Plaintiff to Withdraw as Counsel:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 7th day of May 2008."