alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


SIXTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”)
is made and entered into by and between Cano
Petroleum Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal executive
offices in Fort Worth, Texas (the “Company”),
and Michael J. Ricketts, an
individual currently residing in Tarrant County, Texas (“Employee”), effective
as of the 11th day of November, 2010 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the below described
Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into that certain
Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2006, and subsequent amendments thereto
(the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee now desire to amend,
alter, modify and change the terms and provisions of the Agreement, as follows.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual
benefits to be obtained hereunder and other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and confessed,
Company and Employee do hereby agree to amend, alter, modify and change the
Agreement, as of the Amendment Effective Date as follows:


 


1.             Section 1. Employment.
shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in place and in
lieu thereof.


 


1.             Employment.  The Company hereby employs Employee in the
capacity of Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Employee hereby
agrees to accept such employment by the Company, upon the terms and conditions
stated in this Agreement.


 


2.             Section 4. (a) shall be
deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in place and in lieu
thereof.


 


4.             Compensation.


 


(a)           Salary:  The Company shall pay Employee for his
services, as base salary, on an annualized basis, of $200,000.00 (Two Hundred
Thousand Dollars) per annum for the period from the Effective Date, which
salary shall be payable by the Company in substantially equal installments on
the Company’s normal payroll dates.  All
applicable federal, state and local taxation guidelines.


 


Except
as specifically amended, altered, modified and changed hereby and heretofore,
the Agreement remains in full force and effect as originally written.


 


Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank


Signatures Follow


 

















 


Signatures


 


To
evidence the binding effect of the covenants and agreements described above,
the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first
above written.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  THE
  COMPANY:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  CANO PETROLEUM, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ S. Jeffrey Johnson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  S.
  Jeffrey Johnson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman
  and Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  EMPLOYEE:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/
  Michael J. Ricketts

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Michael J. Ricketts
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Orphan Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Timothy G. McGrath, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/   Timothy G. McGrath                                                   | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |  |                                                                           
| |  | Timothy G. McGrathVice President, Chief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2003 | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Orphan Medical, Inc. and will be
retained by Orphan Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

35

---
Bryan Heath BAKER and wife, Susan D. Baker; Tammy L. Hepler individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John Andrew Hepler III; Steven P. Vanderhoof; Margaret F. Lindsey; and Walter E. Sudderth v. CHARLOTTE MOTOR SPEEDWAY, INC. doing business as Lowe's Motor Speedway, and Tindall Corporation, formerly Tindall Concrete Products, Inc.

No. 642P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Rebecca C. Blount, for Walter Sudderth.

Reid Phillips, Robert J. King, III, Greensboro, for Tindall Corporation.

David N. Allen, Lori R. Keeton, Charlotte, for Charlotte Motor Speedway.

Prior report: 361 N.C. 425, 636 S.E.2d 829.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of December 2006 by Plaintiff (Walter E. Sudderth) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*205"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."

MARTIN, J., recused.
# CE2004084EN.01071701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/717 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/717

---

(2004/C 84 E/0805)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0562/03

by Juan Ojeda Sanz (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(27 February 2003)

Subject:   Arrest of journalists in Gibraltar

Subject:

As the Commission is aware, on 20 January 2003 a group of journalists who were preparing to film the action being taken by the environmentalist group Greenpeace in protest against the oil tanker Vemamagna in Gibraltar were arrested.

Members of the Campo de Gibraltar Press Association have reported that the officers manning the Gibraltarian patrol boats behaved in a violent and arbitrary fashion and then proceeded to arrest some of the journalists present and to detain them in police cells for a nine-hour period, following which they were released without charge.

The above-mentioned Association deems such behaviour to constitute a direct attack on freedom of speech, on the right to report freely and on the right of the general public to be informed.

Could the Commission seek information from the Gibraltar authorities as to the reasons which prompted the officers of the Royal Gibraltar Police to arrest the journalists?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(27 March 2003)

(27 March 2003)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its answer to written E-0201/03 by Mr Menéndez del Valle (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ C 78 E, 27.3.2004, p. 13.

1

---
STATE v. WEBB.

No. COA08-186.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 18, 2008.

Certification Date December 8, 2008.

Appeal from Macon (06CRS80, 06CRS2122).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Richard Aaron BLANKENSHIP, Jr.

No. 45P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Richard A. Blankenship, Jr., Pro Se.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd day of January 2009 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Defense of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee will meet in closed session at the Pentagon on September 22, 2005 from 0900 to 2000 and September 23, 2005 from 0830 to 1500.

The purpose of the meeting is to provide the Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy with independent, informed advice on major matters of defense policy. The Board will hold classified discussions on national security matters.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App II (1982)], it has been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552B(c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: September 8, 2005.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 05-18166 Filed 9-8-05; 3:48 pm]

BILLING CODE 5000-08-M
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1983

In re: GLORIA TYNDLE , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 1:16

- cr - 00001

- IMK

- MJA

- 1; 1:16

- cv - 00205

- IMK

- MJA )

Submitted : November 16, 2017 Decided: November 20, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Gloria Tyndle, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gloria Tyndle petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion

. Sh e seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present reco rd does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis , deny the motion to expedite, and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequa tely presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
# The Designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (Scotland) Regulations 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

S

Scottish Statutory Instruments

# 2014 No. 373

Water

# The Designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (Scotland) Regulations 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

17th December 2014

Laid before the Scottish Parliament

19th December 2014

Coming into force

2nd February 2015

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.1.2016) by The Designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (Scotland) Regulations 2015 (S.S.I. 2015/376), **reg. 6**
EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

                                                 FOR THE THREE
                                                  MONTHS ENDED
                                                    MARCH 31,
                                         -------------------------------
                                              1996              1997
                                              ----              ----
                                                   (UNAUDITED)
Per Share Data:

    Net income                            $     3,539       $      3,744
                                         ============       ============
    Net income per common and common
    equivalent shares, primary            $      0.38       $       0.43
                                         ============       ============
    Net income per common and common
    equivalent shares, fully diluted      $      0.38       $       0.43
                                         ============       ============

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON AND COMMON
EQUIVALENT SHARES:

Primary:
    Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding                   8,915              8,376

    Common equivalent shares:
         Options                                  513                286
                                         ------------       ------------
                                                9,428              8,662
                                         ============       ============
Fully diluted:
    Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding                   8,915              8,376

    Common equivalent shares:
         Options                                  513                286
                                         ------------       ------------
                                                9,428              8,662
                                         ============       ============
# C_2023024EN.01006302.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/63

---

Action brought on 22 November 2022 — Industrias Lácteas Asturianas v EUIPO — Qingdao United Dairy (NAMLAC)

(Case T-728/22)

(2023/C 24/88)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Industrias Lácteas Asturianas, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.C. Riera Blanco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Qingdao United Dairy Co. Ltd (Qingdao, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark NAMLAC — Application for registration No 18 126 515

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2022 in Case R 1563/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Mendesi Lamont FORTE.

No. 263P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Charlotte Blake, Boone, for Forte.

John F. Oates, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of June 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3582 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3582

  To require continued application of budget neutrality on a national 
    basis in calculation of the Medicare urban hospital wage floor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 25 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

Mr. Lautenberg (for himself, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Dodd, and Mr. Lieberman) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require continued application of budget neutrality on a national 
    basis in calculation of the Medicare urban hospital wage floor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safeguarding Our Hospitals' Futures 
Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUED APPLICATION OF BUDGET NEUTRALITY ON A NATIONAL BASIS 
              IN CALCULATION OF THE MEDICARE URBAN HOSPITAL WAGE FLOOR.

    In the case of discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2008, 
the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall continue to administer 
section 4410(b) of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww 
note) and section 412.64(e) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, 
in the same manner as the Secretary administered such sections for 
discharges occurring during fiscal year 2008 (through a uniform, 
national adjustment to the area wage index).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Intermec, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Driessnack,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert J.
Driessnack
 Robert J.
Driessnack
 Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





February
19, 2010
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 395 

To require States and Indian tribes to designate specific highway routes 

over which hazardous materials may be transported. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2007 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require States and Indian tribes to designate specific 

highway routes over which hazardous materials may be 

transported. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL 

4 ROUTES. 

5 Section 5112(a)(2) of title 49, United States Code, 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘subsection (d) of this section’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘subsection (f)’’; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 395 IS

1 (2) by striking ‘‘of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

2 and in accordance with the standards prescribed 

3 under subsection (b),’’; and 

4 (3) by striking ‘‘may’’ and inserting ‘‘shall’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (Nos. 333-43248, 333-56122, and 333-104725) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Active Power, Inc. of our report dated January 16, 2004, with respect to the financial statements of ActivePower, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

Austin, Texas 

February 16, 2004
Exhibit 10.42

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This amendment ("Amendment") is made by and betweenRichard E. Kristensen("Employee") and Tier Technologies, Inc.
("Tier"), collectively referred to as the "Parties," and amends the Employment Agreement between the Parties dated
March 1, 2000 ("Agreement"). The Amendment is effective as of May 1, 2001.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it is in their mutual best interests to modify certain provisions of the Agreement;

WHEREAS,
the Parties further agree that such modifications benefit their mutual interests in the Continuing Business (as defined below);

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties
agree as follows:

1.Modification to Salary.Paragraph 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby modified as follows:
effective May 1, 2001 Employee's base salary shall be one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) per year, payable semi-monthly in arrears in accordance with Tier's regular
payroll practices.

2.Additional Terms.In the event Employee is terminated from employment for reasons other than Cause
(as defined in the Agreement), Employee shall be entitled to a severance payment in the amount of two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($275,000), such amount to be reduced by twelve
thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500) for each month Employee remains employed by Tier,
commencing May 1, 2001. This severance payment shall be in addition to any other provisions in the Agreement.

3.Other Provisions.All other provisions of the Agreement remain in effect.

4.Continuing Business.Continuing Business is defined as the activities of Tier arising out of the
management consulting business of The SCA Group, Inc., ("Seller"), as more fully defined in the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets between Seller and Tier dated as of March 9,
2000.

[signature page follows]

1

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of May 1, 2001.

| |  | Tier Technologies, Inc.                                                                         
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                                                             
| |  | Its:                                                                                            
| |  | 1350 Treat Blvd., Suite 250
Walnut Creek, CA 94596                                              
| |  | /s/ Richard E. KristensenRichard E. Kristensen1021 Diamond Head Way
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418

2

---

QuickLinks