alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2372 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2372 of 26 November 2015 adopting a fifth update of the list of sites of Community            importance for the Macaronesian biogeographical region (notified under document C(2015) 8215) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2372                     

# of 26 November 2015

# adopting a fifth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Macaronesian biogeographical region

# *(notified under document C(2015) 8215)* (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2330 of 9 December 2016 adopting a sixth update of the list of sites of Community                                 importance for the Macaronesian biogeographical region (notified under document C(2016) 8183).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 483 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 483

                  For the relief of Salah Naji Sujaa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 2007

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Salah Naji Sujaa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SALAH NAJI SUJAA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) and section 
240 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a), Salah Naji Sujaa shall be eligible 
for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 
of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 
Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Salah Naji Sujaa enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Salah 
Naji Sujaa shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully 
and, if otherwise eligible, shall be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1255) as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Salah Naji Sujaa, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
Salah Naji Sujaa's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
Salah Naji Sujaa's birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
CUMBO v. CUMBO.

No. COA08-574.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Beaufort (04CVD1174).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 517 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 517

To amend the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the 
  Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 to authorize the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide additional assistance to 
   State and local governments for utility costs resulting from the 
provision of temporary housing units to evacuees from Hurricane Katrina 
                         and other hurricanes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2007

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the 
  Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 to authorize the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide additional assistance to 
   State and local governments for utility costs resulting from the 
provision of temporary housing units to evacuees from Hurricane Katrina 
                         and other hurricanes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FOR UTILITY COSTS RESULTING FROM THE 
              PROVISION OF TEMPORARY HOUSING UNITS TO EVACUEES FROM 
              HURRICANE KATRINA AND OTHER HURRICANES.

    Section 2401 of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for 
Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public 
Law 109-234; 120 Stat. 460) is amended by striking ``12 months'' and 
inserting ``24 months''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. GRIMES.

No. COA08-425.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Pitt (03CRS8431).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
ex101.htm






Summary


Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer Annual Bonus Plan








	
Maximum bonus in terms of base salary:

	
Chief Financial Officer (CFO) – 2.25X


Chief Legal Officer (CLO) – 2.00X


	
Required deferral:

	
CFO – bonus greater than 1.75X base salary


CLO – Bonus greater than 1.50X base salary


All deferral amounts will be paid in restricted stock units (RSUs) that proportionally vest over three years but are not delivered until the end of the third year.


	
Bonus formula:

	
Two parts:


A – Economic plan performance, the sum of 0.8 percent of modified EBITDA, as defined in the 2010 Annual Executive Bonus Plan, plus 0.2 percent of modified free cash flow, as defined in the plan, subject to a maximum of 1.6 X base salary for the CFO and 1.4 X base salary for the CLO


B – Objectives performance


CFO – 0.65X base salary maximum


CLO – 0.60X base salary maximum


	
Negative judgment:

	
May be applied on both economic and objectives performance


Economic performance also may be subject to adjustment based on relative performance analysis


	
Claw back:

	
If the board of directors determines that there was executive misconduct in a prior period in the preparation of the financial results for that period, the compensation committee will determine whether the restatement was material and was a result of executive misconduct in preparation of the financial information and, if so, to what extent “covered payments” should be returned to the Company to the extent that such payments were overstated as a result of the change in financial condition. Covered payments include cash incentives paid to the executive found to have actively participated in the executive misconduct for performance during the fiscal year(s).







 


Chief Financial Officer Objectives


 



	 	
Objective

	
Min

	 	
Max


	1	
Timely and accurate filings of periodic reports

	$	(15,000)	 	$	30,000
	2	
Key SAP milestones

	$	(10,000)	 	$	10,000
	3	
Financial due diligence

	$	(30,000)	 	$	30,000
	4	
Monitoring of credit collection

	$	(60,000)	 	$	60,000
	5	
Hiring, development and succession planning

	$	(50,000)	 	$	50,000
	6	
Cost savings initiatives

	$	-	 	$	30,000
	 	
Total

	$	(165,000)	 	$	210,000





 


Chief Legal Officer Objectives


 



	 	
Objective

	
Min

	 	
Max


	1	
Timely and accurate filing of periodic reports

	$	(7,500)	 	$	15,000
	2	
Meeting deadlines for due diligence

	$	(40,000)	 	$	40,000
	3	
Timeliness and accuracy of requested analysis by Chairman and CEO

	$	(40,000)	 	$	40,000
	4	
Litigation

	$	-	 	$	45,000
	5	
Cost saving initiatives

	$	-	 	$	30,000
	6	
Overall judgment

	$	(20,000)	 	$	20,000
	 	
Total

	$	(107,500)	 	$	190,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PL
BRANDS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JANUARY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                          1,803
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,803
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           66,729
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        9,143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      2,128,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    (64,926)
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                21,225
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                139,044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (117,819)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (117,819)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (117,819)
<EPS-BASIC>                   .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .000



</TABLE>
STATE v. LITTLE

No. COA07-575

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 19, 2008.

Certification Date March 10, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (05CRS62292).

Decision without published opinion. No error.
#### Roman Grossman, Respondent, v Amalgamated Warbasse Houses, Inc., Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 748]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated August 16, 2004, as denied that branch of its cross motion which was to vacate the note of issue and strike the action from the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Inasmuch as the certificate of readiness contained no misrepresentations concerning the status of the discovery process, and the Supreme Court expressly permitted further discovery, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was to vacate the note of issue and strike the action from the trial calendar *(see Sun Plaza Enters. Corp. v Crown Theatres,*307 AD2d 352, 353 [2003]; *Torres v New York City Tr. Auth.,*192 AD2d 400 [1993]; *cf. Davis v Goodsell,*6 AD3d 382, 385 [2004]).

The parties’ remaining contentions are not properly before this Court as they raise issues not determined in the order appealed from *(see NYCTL 1997-1 Trust v Vila,*19 AD3d 382 [2005]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.1

 



AT HOME GROUP   INC. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE SIDE   FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.01   PAR VALUE, OF AT HOME GROUP INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation   by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this   certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until   countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS   WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by   facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: SIG TO COME SIG   TO COME TITLE TITLE COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER   & TRUST COMPANY (Brooklyn, New York) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY   AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of CUSIP 04650Y 100   XXXX XXXX 


    




 






 



The following   abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,   shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to   applicable laws or regulations: UTMA – Custodian TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN – as   tenants in common – as tenants by entireties (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform   Transfers to Minors Act – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not   as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though   not in the above list. For value received hereby sell, assign, and transfer   unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE   (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF   ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate,   and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the   said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of   substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT   MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN   EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.   SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION   (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER   AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.   MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM   (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT   ACCEPTABLE.
Opinion issued September 26 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 19
- 00232
- CR

——————————— DAIZY CELES COSTELLO , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1544494

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Dai z y Celes Costello, has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2 (a). 1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

1 Motion filed April 22, 2019.2

42.2(a). The State has not opposed this motion. We have not issued a decision in the appeal

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Count iss. Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
STATE of North Carolina v. Scott Andrew CANADY.

No. 417P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

George B. Currin, Raleigh, for Canady.

Victoria Voight, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*663Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 664 S.E.2d 380.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of September 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
STATE of North Carolina V. Lisa Renee JORDAN.

No. 81P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

James N. Freeman, Jr., for Jordan.

John W. Congleton, Assistant Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of February 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
STATE v. COLON.

No. COA07-1418.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Columbus (05CRS2530).

Case reported without published opinion. Remanded.
#### In the Matter of Frederick Franklin, Appellant, v Tara Christie Miner, as Records Access Officer, New York County District Attorney’s Office, Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 417]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lottie E. Wilkins, J.), entered March 3, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, dismissed petitioner’s application for an order compelling the District Attorney’s Office to grant his request, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law, for plea minutes, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition granted.

Because respondent is an agency under the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law § 84 *et seq.)*and it presently holds the material requested by petitioner, it must furnish him with copies thereof, unless it demonstrates that the material falls within a statutory exemption *(Matter of Newsday, Inc. v Empire State Dev. Corp.,*98 NY2d 359, 362 [2002]). The material does not fall within either of the two exemptions claimed by respondent. CPLR 8002 does not “specifically” exempt records from disclosure (Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [a]); indeed, it does not address disclosure at all. And respondent has not explained how disclosing the requested material would impair collective bargaining negotiations (Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [c]). Moreover, CPLR 8002 does not govern petitioner’s request because petitioner was not the defendant or a party in the relevant litigation *(see also*Judiciary Law §§ 300, 302 [1]). Concur— Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Scott KIRBY.

No. 14P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Marilyn Ozer, Chapel Hill, for Michael Scott Kirby.

Steven Bryant, Assistant Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 653 S.E.2d 174.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 11th day of January 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of January 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 16/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 16/2014 of 9 January 2014 amending for the 209th time Council Regulation (EC) No            881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the            Al Qaida network         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 16/2014                     

# of 9 January 2014

# amending for the 209th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against                        certain persons and entities associated with the Al Qaida network                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed                           against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaida network,(1) and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and 7a(5) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic                              resources under that Regulation.

(2)On 19 December 2013, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided to remove one person from                              its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

(3)Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be updated accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 January 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

*the Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

The following entry under the heading ‘Natural persons’ is deleted:

‘Abdelhadi Ben Debka (alias (a) L'Hadi Bendebka, (b) El Hadj ben Debka, (c) Abd Al Hadi, (d) Hadi). Address: Algeria. Date                        of birth: 17.11.1963. Place of birth: Algiers, Algeria. Nationality: Algerian. Other information: Deported from Italy to Algeria                        on 13.9.2008. Date of designation referred to in Article 2a (4) (b): 17.3.2004.’                  

1

OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PL
BRANDS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JANUARY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                          543
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   293,974
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     66,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                382,882
<PP&E>                          1,316,615
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,813,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           544,374
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        9,143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      2,128,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    61,907
<SALES>                         1,964,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,964,709
<CGS>                           1,160,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,160,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                712,720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (104,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (104,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (104,942)
<EPS-BASIC>                   .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .000



</TABLE>