alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          50,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,211
<PP&E>                                         176,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 240,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,257
<BONDS>                                         25,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                     178,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   240,488
<SALES>                                         55,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,747
<CGS>                                           50,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,065
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,428
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,916
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,002)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,086)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)


</TABLE>
STATE v. HOILMAN.

No. COA07-736.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from Avery (06CRS50968).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Form of Employment Agreement Amendment



  

 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”),
dated [—], by and between United Maritime Group, LLC (formerly known as TECO Transport Corporation) (the “Company”), and [Employee] (the “Employee”) is
entered into as of this [—], 2010, to be effective as of the date hereof. 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee are parties to the Employment Agreement; and 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows (with terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment having the same
meaning as set forth in the Employment Agreement): 
 1. The first sentence of the definition of “Good Reason” shall
be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following sentence: 
 ““Good Reason” shall mean, without
Employee’s consent, (i) a material diminution in Employee’s title, duties or responsibilities, (ii) the relocation of Employee’s principal place of employment (as set forth in Section 3(c) hereof) more than fifty
(50) miles from its current location, (iii) the failure of the Company to pay any compensation owing to the Employee pursuant to Section 4 when such compensation is due, or (iv) the Company’s failure to obtain the full
assumption of this Agreement by a successor entity following a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.” 
 Except as provided herein and to the extent necessary to give full effect to the provisions of this Amendment, the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

*        *        * 

[Signatures to appear on following page.] 







  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 
 UNITED MARITIME GROUP, LLC 

 

			
	By:	 	  



			
	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	
	
	[EMPLOYEE]
	
	  



  
 - 2 -
STATE of North Carolina v. Anderson Sheldon HAZELWOOD.

No. 492P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, for Hazelwood.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: 187 N.C.App. 94, 652 S.E.2d 63.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd day of November 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 726/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 726/2014 of 30 June 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 992/95 as regards            a new Union tariff quota for prepared herring originating in Norway         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 726/2014                     

# of 30 June 2014

# amending Council Regulation (EC) No 992/95 as regards a new Union tariff quota for prepared herring originating in Norway

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 992/95 of 10 April 1995 opening and providing for the administration of Community                           tariff quotas for certain agricultural and fishery products originating in Norway(1), and in particular Article 5(1)(b) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)By Council Decision 2014/343/EU(2), the signing and the provisional application of an Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community                              and the Kingdom of Norway consequent to the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union have been approved.

(2)The Additional Protocol provides for a new tariff quota for release for free circulation in the European Union of certain                              prepared herring originating in Norway.

(3)It is necessary to amend Regulation (EC) No 992/95 in order to implement the new tariff quota.

(4)The new tariff quota should apply for a period of 12 months. In accordance with Decision 2014/343/EU, it is to apply from                              the day of the provisional application of the Additional Protocol. This Regulation should therefore apply from the same date.

(5)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following row is added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 992/95:

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

It shall apply from 1 August 2014.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 101, 4.5.1995, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 170, 11.6.2014, p. 3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
VISION CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 3,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                           9,604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                       430
<INVENTORY>                                      8,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,216
<PP&E>                                           7,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,577
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,401
<SALES>                                         39,694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,694
<CGS>                                           22,151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,701
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1602-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-1602-DR), dated August 28, 2005, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 4, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 28, 2005:

Bay, Escambia, Gulf, and Santa Rosa Counties for Public Assistance.

                        (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public                               ( print page 53803)                            Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)                    

Michael D. Brown,

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 05-17993 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
STATE v. STACEY.

No. COA08-883.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 3, 2009.

Certification Date February 23, 2009.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS39324, 06CRS62468).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,714,771
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,297,972
<PP&E>                                      23,367,861
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,177,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,313,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,873,920
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,650
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,357,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,313,061
<SALES>                                     22,012,659
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,012,659
<CGS>                                        9,524,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,331,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             344,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,608,729)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,608,729)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,608,729)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)


</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01000301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/3

---

(2004/C 84 E/0003)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0561/03

by Olivier Dupuis (NI) to the Commission

(27 February 2003)

Subject:   Hunger strike by Mr Jebali

Subject:

Mr Hamadi Jebali, the former editor of the Al Fajr weekly periodical, has been on hunger strike since 13 January 2003, i.e. for 36 days. According to Tunisia's International Association for Political Prisoner Support he was transferred on 12 February 2003 to the emergency ward of a hospital in Bizerte. Despite numerous appeals from within Tunisia and around the world calling for Mr Jebali's release, there has still been no reaction from the Tunisian authorities. On 6 February a member of Reporters sans frontières, who had asked to be allowed to visit Mr Jebali in the Nador prison in Bizerte (in the north of the country), had his request turned down by the Directorate-General for Prisons. Mr Jebali's lawyer, Mr Mohamed Nouri, and his wife have reported that he is coming under intense pressure from members of the State Security Department to abandon his hunger strike. His wife and his daughters — whose house is under surveillance — have now had their passports taken away from them. In 1992 the military court in Tunis sentenced Mr Jebali to 16 years in prison for ‘belonging to an illegal organisation’. At the time he had just completed a one-year prison sentence for having published an article in which he criticised the military court system.

What action has the Commission taken in order to help Mr Jebali? Has it been able (via its delegation in Tunis) to make direct enquiries regarding the conditions in which Mr Jebali is being held and the state of his health, now that he has been on hunger strike for over a month? Has it raised the issue of a general amnesty for crimes of conscience committed during the 1980s and 1990s and, if so, how have the Tunisian authorities reacted?

---
STATE v. FLEMING.

No. COA08-433.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 3, 2009.

Certification Date February 23, 2009.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (06CRS233328, 06CRS233329).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
Exhibit 10.106

TAX ALLOCATION AGREEMENT

This Agreement is entered into as of July 2, 2001, by and between Mission Energy Holding Company, a Delaware corporation ("MEH"), and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Edison Mission Energy, a Delaware corporation ("EME").

RECITALS

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:



1

---



2

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above written

| |  | MISSION ENERGY HOLDING COMPANY
| |  | ------------------------------
| |  | By:                           
| |  | EDISON MISSION ENERGY         
| |  | By:                           

3

---

QuickLinks
In the Matter of J.G.L.

No. 20P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Jayne B. Norwood, for Nash County DSS.

Pamela N. Williams, Associate Counsel, for Guardian ad Litem.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of January 2009 by Respondent (Mother) for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of February 2009."
MISSION HOSPITALS v. RADIATION THERAPY.

No. 498P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 3, 2008.

Robert V. Bode, S. Todd Hemphill, Diana Evans Ricketts, Raleigh, Matthew A. Fisher, for Asheville Hematology.

June S. Ferrell, Assistant Attorney General, for DHR.

Susan H. Hargrove, Sean A. Timmons, Courtney H. Mischen, Raleigh, for NC Radiation Therapy.

Allyson Jones Labbon, Terrill Johnson Harris, Greensboro, for Mission Hospitals.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of August 2008 by Petitioner & Petitioner Intervenors for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of September 2008."

MARTIN, J., recused.
ELM ST. GALLERY, INC., William B. Heroy, Anna R. Heroy, Individually and d/b/a Heroy Studios and Old Photo Specialists, Inc. v. Robert M. WILLIAMS and Shelia V. Williams.

No. 414P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

W. Rob Heroy, Charlotte, for Elm Street Gallery, et al.

Norman B. Smith, Greensboro, for Williams.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 663 S.E.2d 874.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of September 2008 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."

EDMUNDS, J., recused.
# Decision (EU) 2016/3 of the European Central Bank (repealed)Show full title

Decision (EU) 2016/3 of the European Central Bank of 18 November 2015 laying down the principles for providing feedback on            the performance of national competent authorities' sub-coordinators in the joint supervisory teams of the Single Supervisory            Mechanism (ECB/2015/36) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Decision (EU) 2016/3 of the European Central Bank

# of 18 November 2015

# laying down the principles for providing feedback on the performance of national competent authorities' sub-coordinators in                        the joint supervisory teams of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (ECB/2015/36) (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Decision (EU) 2017/274 of the European Central Bank of 10 February 2017 laying down the principles for providing performance                                 feedback to national competent authority sub-coordinators and repealing Decision (EU) 2016/3 (ECB/2017/6).
SHEW v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.

No. COA08-902.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from Rowan (07CVS2363).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

Our ref.: EC/KT/C658/ABA4/

April 14, 2008

The Board of Directors
Chinawe.com Inc.
Room 1304-05
Dongbao Tower
767 Dongfeng Road East
Guangzhou
China 510600

Dear Sirs:

Chinawe.com
Consent of Independent Public Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-71730) of Chinawe.com Inc. of our report dated April 14, 2008 which appears on page F-2 of this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Mazars CPA Limited

Certified Public Accountants

Hong Kong
April 14, 2008

---
In re E.S. appealed by Juvenile.

No. 396P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Daniel R. Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for E.S.

Chris Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 663 S.E.2d 475.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of September 2008 by Juvenile in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."