alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               175
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             1,458
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                       0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             2,083
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               2,076
<LOANS>                                          138,542
<ALLOWANCE>                                          101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   146,580
<DEPOSITS>                                        80,824
<SHORT-TERM>                                          80
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                1,802
<LONG-TERM>                                       45,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              17
<OTHER-SE>                                        18,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   146,580
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    2,594
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                     33
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      57
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   2,684
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 1,014
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,682
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              1,002
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      594
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           392
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         392
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      2.77
<LOANS-NON>                                            0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         135
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     101
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          0
<RECOVERIES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    101
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              101


</TABLE>
STATE v. JORDAN.

No. COA08-54.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Wayne (06CRS53787).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,502
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,255
<INVENTORY>                                     23,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,421
<PP&E>                                          10,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,615
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,068
<SALES>                                         80,379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,379
<CGS>                                           43,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   282
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,450
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,562
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,888
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,888
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
        


</TABLE>
# CE2004078EN.01038701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/387 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/387

---

(2004/C 78 E/0410)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1832/03

by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(2 June 2003)

Subject:   Substandard workmanship in Greece

Subject:

From the Commission's answer to my Question (E-0807/03) (1) I gather that the problem of substandard workmanship in Greece continues to exist and that it is not always clear what steps have been taken by the authorities in response to this.

1

Since 31 May 2003 is the final date for settlement of amounts due under the second CSF, can the Commission indicate its general position regarding the problem of substandard workmanship affecting projects receiving funding under the second CSF in Greece and say what measures it will take to resolve the matter under the relevant European Union rules?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(5 August 2003)

(5 August 2003)

The Commission refers the Honourable Member to its reply to his previous question E-0807/03 (2).

2

In addition at the appropriate moment in time, a closure proposal will be made to the Greek authorities on the basis of the information made available by these authorities to the Commission services. It should be noted that the date of 31 May 2003 refers to the deadline to be respected as a general rule. The experience from the closure procedure for the majority of programmes in almost all the Member States has shown that this deadline will be difficult to comply with in view of the quantity and quality of the dossiers submitted by the Member States. The closure proposal for Greece will take account, in due time, of the findings of Espel concerning any sub-standard works, and the extent to which the required remedial works are certified by the Greek authorities as having been subsequently carried out.

---

(1)  OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 122.

1

(2)  OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 122.

2

---
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3 

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for fair prescription drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. LEAHY, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. CLINTON, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. KOHL, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. 

WEBB, and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act to provide for fair prescription drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; SENSE OF THE CONGRESS. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Medicare Prescription Drug Price Negotiation Act of 

6 2007’’. 

7 (b) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.—It is the sense of 

8 the Congress that the Congress should enact, and the 

9 President should sign, legislation to amend part D of title 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 3 IS

1 XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for fair pre2 scription drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

#### **CERTIFICATIONS OFPERIODIC REPORT**

#### ** **

I,John R. Serino, President and Chief Executive Officer of Encision Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

·                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the three months ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Dated:   August 14,  2009 |                         |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                          |                         |
|                                          | /s/  John R. Serino          |
|                                          |                         |
|                                          | John  R. Serino              |
|                                          | Principal  Executive Officer |

 

 

I,Marcia McHaffie, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of Encision Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

·                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the three months ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Dated:   August 14,  2009 |                                                                      |
|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          |                                                                      |
|                                          | /s/  Marcia McHaffie                                                      |
|                                          |                                                                      |
|                                          | Marcia  McHaffie                                                          |
|                                          | Controller,  Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EDISON
MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         450,777
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    182,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               880,593
<PP&E>                                       8,279,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                 366,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,189,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,293,007
<BONDS>                                      5,104,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          307,536
<PREFERRED>                                    118,054
<COMMON>                                        64,130
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,101,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,189,084
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               878,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  441,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             245,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                183,022
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,006
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (13,840)
<NET-INCOME>                                   136,176
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2023235EN.01007401.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/74

---

Action brought on 22 May 2023 — Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO — Kåska (smål)

(Case T-279/23)

(2023/C 235/88)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Sumol + Compal Marcas SA (Carnaxide, Portugal) (represented by: R. Milhões, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kåska Oy (Helsinki, Finland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative trade mark smål — Application for registration No 18 442 375

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 March 2023 in Case R 2295/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 23 September 2022 in opposition proceedings No. B 3 150 396; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 23 September 2022 in opposition proceedings No. B 3 150 396;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of and incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of and incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
| (1)    | The Report fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    | The information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the  Trust. |

| /s/      Randall D. Holmes |
|----------------------------|
| Name:                      | Randall      D. Holmes |
| Title:                     | President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer)  |
| Dated:                     | May      9, 2008 |

| /s/      Jeffrey H. Strasberg |
|-------------------------------|
| Name:                         | Jeffrey      H. Strasberg |
| Title:                        | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                          | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)  |
| Dated:                        | May      9, 2008 |

----
----

(2004/C 33 E/017)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3311/02

by Regina Bastos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(15 November 2002)

Subject:   EU financing for the United Nations Population Fund

Following the decision by the US to suspend its financial contribution (to the sum of USD 34 million for 2002) to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the Danish presidency of the EU has reaffirmed its support for the work of that organisation, and has stated that the EU will replace the US funding with its own.

Can the Commission confirm that the EU will provide funding for the UNFPA in replacement of the former US contribution?

If so, can the Commission give information on:

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(7 January 2003)

The Development Council of the Union, at its meeting on 30 May 2002, issued a statement underlining the importance of the work of the United Nations Population Fund (UNPFA) and calling on all donor countries to pursue their support of the Fund. The statement also welcomed the Commission's intention to strengthen its cooperation with UNFPA.

The Commission has repeatedly expressed its disappointment at the decisions by the American administration to withdraw funding for UNFPA. The Commission considers that the resulting gap in UNFPAs Core budget will seriously weaken the organisation mandated by the international community to lead implementation world-wide of the Programme of Action adopted by consensus at the UN International Conference on Population and Development (Cairo, September 1994). The Commission has not pledged to replace the US contribution to UNFPA's Core budget. Rather, in the light of the decisions by the American government, the Commission will increase its programme support to UNFPA and the IPPF to implement reproductive health activities in developing countries.

On 10 September 2002, the Commission signed the financing agreement for the 8th European Development Fund (EDF) EU 32 million programme, to be implemented by UNFPA (two-thirds) and the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF, one-third) in 22 of the poorest African, Caribbean and Pacific countries. This programme aims at improving the capacities in ACP countries to deliver basic reproductive health services to vulnerable and under-served communities. The Commission expects that the contracts with UNFPA and IPPF will be signed in the near future, and that programme implementation will commence early in 2003. Additional support for UNFPA to implement reproductive health activities is envisaged under the 9th EDF.

----
# Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2249Show full title

Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2249 of 3 December 2015 amending Decision 2014/486/CFSP on the European Union Advisory Mission            for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2249                     

# of 3 December 2015

# amending Decision 2014/486/CFSP on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/486/CFSP(1) on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine).

(2)On 17 November 2014, by means of Decision 2014/800/CFSP(2), the Council decided to launch EUAM Ukraine on 1 December 2014 and to amend Decision 2014/486/CFSP in order to provide EUAM                              Ukraine with a financial reference amount for the period until 30 November 2015.

(3)Decision 2014/486/CFSP should be amended to provide for a financial reference amount for the period from 1 December 2015 to                              30 November 2016.

(4)Furthermore, Decision 2014/486/CFSP should be amended to extend the mandate of EUAM Ukraine by one year,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Decision 2014/486/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:

In Article 14(1), the following subparagraph is added:

‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUAM Ukraine for the period from 1 December 2015                                 to 30 November 2016 shall be EUR 14 400 000.’.                           

In Article 19, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:

‘It shall apply until 30 November 2017.’.                           

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply from 1 December 2015.

Done at Brussels, 3 December 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

F. Braz                            

1

Council Decision 2014/486/CFSP of 22 July 2014 on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform                              Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 42).                           

2

Council Decision 2014/800/CFSP of 17 November 2014 launching the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector                              Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) and amending Decision 2014/486/CFSP (OJ L 331, 18.11.2014, p. 24).