alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2014 of 14 March 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2014                     

# of 14 March 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 March 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Shirley D. PILES v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and Ricky McGhee.

No. 603P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Margaret P. Eagles, for Insurance Company, et al.

Marie Lang, Durham, for Piles.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 653 S.E.2d 181.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of December 2007 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
**Exhibit 32.1                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Enviro Voraxial Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alberto DiBella, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:     /s/Alberto DiBella                           Alberto DiBella                 Principal Executive Officer

April 16, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, T. Kendall
Hunt, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ T. Kendall Hunt                                           
|T. Kendall Hunt                                               
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors

March 13, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Electroscope, Inc. balance sheet as of September 30, 1999 and statements of
operation and cash flows for the six months ended September 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,284,066
<SECURITIES>                                 1,994,020
<RECEIVABLES>                                  347,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,955)
<INVENTORY>                                    668,329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,180,352
<PP&E>                                         684,930
<DEPRECIATION>                               (498,561)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,503,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          402,857
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,941,317
<OTHER-SE>                                     290,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,503,026
<SALES>                                        918,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               918,454
<CGS>                                          553,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,254,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (61,509)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (828,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (828,436)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (828,436)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00397-CR

Kristina Danielle Lara

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

156th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. LCR200030

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by 

this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 28, 2022
# C_2023024EN.01005502.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/55

---

Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Pamastock Investments v Commission

(Case T-701/22)

(2023/C 24/77)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Pamastock Investments, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.

---
PROGRESS ENERGY v. STRICKLAND.

No. 118A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Norman W. Shearin, Jr., Kitty Hawk, for Strickland.

Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., John C. Cooke, Raleigh, Elizabeth T. Smith, Garris Neil Yarborough, Fayetteville, for Progress Energy.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 640 S.E.2d 856.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of May 2007 by Defendant to Withdraw Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Enviro Voraxial
Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Alberto DiBella, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By:  /s/ Alberto DiBella
     -------------------
     Alberto DiBella
     Principal Financial Officer
     April 14, 2004
Exhibit 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ENACTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Quarterly Report") of Edison
Mission Energy (the "Company"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best of his
knowledge and belief, that:

| |  | /s/THOMAS R. MCDANIELThomas R. McDaniel Chief Executive Officer
Edison Mission Energy
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/KEVIN M. SMITHKevin M. Smith Chief Financial Officer
Edison Mission Energy        

This
statement accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Edison Mission Energy and will be retained by Edison Mission Energy and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
STATE of North Carolina v. Demond Antonio WELLS.

No. 514P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Demond A Wells, Pro Se.

L. Michael Dodd, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney for State of NC.

*662*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 16th day of October 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th day of October 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."

HUDSON, J., recused.
Exhibit 4.2 [FRONT OF CERTIFICATE]  NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE   NUMBERNEW NRG, INC.
AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK 500,000,000 SHARES
PAR VALUE $.0001SHARES   THIS CERTIFIES THAT__________________________________  IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF ____________________________  Shares of NEW NRG, INC. Warrants transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.  This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.  Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signature of the duly authorized officers.  Dated:[SEAL]SECRETARYDIRECTOR  NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENTCOUNTERSIGNED & REGISTERED
NEVADA AGENCY AND TRUST COMPANY
50 WEST LIBERTY STREET * SUITE 880 * RENO, NEVADA 89501BY: ______________________
Authorized Signature   {A0040868.DOC}  [BACK OF CERTIFICATE]  The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations.  TEN COM-- as tenants in commonUNIF GIFT MIN ACT-- ________ Custodian __________TEN ENT-- as tenants by the entireties(Cust)                              (Minor)JT TEN-- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in commonunder Uniform Gifts to Minors
Act __________________
(State)Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.  For value received, _____________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer untoPlease insert social security or other
Identifying number of assignee ______________________PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS OR ASSIGNEESharesof the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appointAttorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.Dated:_____________________________________________________________________________NOTICE:THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.  NOTICE SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:  SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A FIRM WHICH IS A MEMBER OF A REGISTERED NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE, OR BY A BANK (OTHER THAN A SAVINGS BANK), OR A TRUST COMPANY.  THE GUARANTEEING FIRM MUST BE A MEMBER OF THE MEDALLION GUARANTEE PROGRAM.  TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY.  {A0040868.DOC}
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

The Board of Directors
Logility, Inc.:

   We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-62531 and 333-66773) on Form S-8 of Logility, Inc. of our reports
dated June 16, 2000, relating to the combined balance sheets of Logility, Inc.
as of April 30, 2000, and 1999, and the related combined statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended April 30, 2000, and related schedule, which reports
appear in the April 30, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Logility, Inc.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
July 26, 2000
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                      WILLIAMS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                             --------------------------------
                                                               1999        1998        1997
                                                             ---------   ---------   --------
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
  Loss before income taxes.................................  $(367,472)  $(190,826)  $(28,005)
  Add:
     Interest expense -- net...............................     97,212       7,468        933
     Rental expense representative of interest factor......     96,786      44,590     28,120
     Minority interest income (loss) of consolidated
       subsidiaries........................................    (31,503)    (15,645)    13,506
     Equity losses.........................................     36,440       7,908      2,383
                                                             ---------   ---------   --------
          Total earnings (loss) as adjusted plus fixed
            charges........................................  $(168,537)  $(146,505)  $ 16,937
                                                             =========   =========   ========
Combined fixed charges:
  Interest expense -- net..................................  $  97,212   $   7,468   $    933
  Capitalized interest.....................................     39,518      11,182      7,781
  Rental expense representative of interest factor.........     96,786      44,590     28,120
                                                             ---------   ---------   --------
          Total fixed charges..............................  $ 233,516   $  63,240   $ 36,834
                                                             =========   =========   ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.........................         (a)         (a)        (a)
                                                             =========   =========   ========
</TABLE>

-------------------------

(a) Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $402,053,000,
    $209,745,000 and $19,897,000 for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Karen MATTHEWS, Employee v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY, Employer, Self-Insured.

No. 35P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Julie B. Bradburn, Raleigh, Clayton M. Custer, Greenville, SC, for Wake Forest University.

Maureen Geraghty, Winston-Salem, Neill S. Fuleihan, Richard B. Harper, Sylva, for Matthews.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 653 S.E.2d 557.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of January 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
Exhibit 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Community Investors Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                                  /s/Phillip W. Gerber
                                  --------------------------
                                  Name: Phillip W. Gerber
                                  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 12, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Community Investors Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by
Community Investors Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          62,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               369,157
<PP&E>                                      11,441,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                 989,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,049,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          408,870
<BONDS>                                      4,845,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,335,791
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,049,110
<SALES>                                      1,255,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,273,547
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  472,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             244,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                243,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            243,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                  64,315
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (451)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   222,543
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.66


</TABLE>