alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Promissory Note, dated February 25, 2009



  
 Exhibit 10.7

 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	U.S. $338,000	  	25 February 2009
		  	St. John’s, Antigua

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, M2 Global Ltd. (the “Issuer”), a company registered in Antigua and Barbuda, hereby promises to pay to Global Asset Fund Ltd., a Cayman
Islands Corporation, or its assigns, the principal sum of Three Hundred and Thirty-Eight Thousand Dollars ($338,000.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of Six Percent (6%) per annum. 

The entire unpaid principal amount outstanding under this promissory note (this “Note”), together with interest thereon, shall
be due and payable on 30 September 2009 (the “Maturity Date”). Interest is to be paid on the Maturity Date. Issuer may, at any time, prepay any or all of the principal or interest due under this Note without premium or penalty.
Payments with respect to this Note are to be made in lawful money of the United States of America. 
 The entire unpaid
principal amount outstanding under this Note, together with interest thereon, shall become immediately due and payable upon the insolvency of Issuer, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by Issuer, the execution by Issuer of a general assignment
for the benefit of creditors, or the filing by or against Issuer of a petition in bankruptcy or a petition for relief under the provisions of any country’s bankruptcy act or law for the relief of debtors and the continuation of such petition
without dismissal for a period of 90 days or more. Any principal balance that is due but remains unpaid shall bear interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) until paid in full. The parties hereto hereby expressly waive presentment, demand for
payment, dishonor, notice of dishonor, protest, notice of protest, and any other formality. This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida without regard to the principles or rules of conflicts of
laws thereof to the extent that such principles or rules would require the application of the laws of another jurisdiction. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Issuer has caused this Note to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written. 
 M2 GLOBAL LTD.

  

	
	 /s/ Michael A. Muscato

	By: Michael A. Muscato, CEO

 Although I will not personally
receive any loan proceeds, I promise to repay the full amount of this Note, including unpaid principal and accrued interest, if, upon demand by the holder of the Note, the Issuer fails to repay the debt. 

 

	
	 /s/ Michael A. Muscato

	 Michael A. Muscato, Personally
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 842/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 842/2014 of 4 July 2014 establishing for 2014 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided            for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 (Text with EEA relevance)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 842/2014                     

# of 4 July 2014

# establishing for 2014 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91

# (Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 of 19 December 1991 on the establishment of a Community survey of industrial                           production(1), and in particular Article 2(6) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91 requires Member States to carry out a Community survey of industrial production.

(2)The survey of industrial production must be based on a list of products identifying the industrial production to be surveyed.

(3)A list of products is necessary to permit alignment between production statistics and external trade statistics and to afford                              comparison with the Community product nomenclature CPA.

(4)The list of products required by Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91, referred to as the ‘Prodcom list’, is common to all Member States,                              and is necessary in order to compare data across Member States.

(5)The Prodcom list needs to be updated; it is therefore necessary to establish the list for 2014.

(6)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the European Statistical System Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Prodcom list for 2014 shall be as set out in the Annex.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

It shall apply from 1 January 2014.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 July 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 374, 31.12.1991, p. 1.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1267/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1267/2014 of 25 November 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for Northern prawn in Greenland            waters of NAFO 1 by vessels flying the flag of Denmark         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1267/2014                     

# of 25 November 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for Northern prawn in Greenland waters of NAFO 1 by vessels flying the flag of Denmark

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
----

(2004/C 65 E/113)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1881/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(6 June 2003)

Subject:   Intra-EU foreign direct investment

Will the Commission update the figures given in answer to E-0033/02 (1) to include the latest available year? It should provide figures on a comparable basis to those given for the European Union for intra-EU foreign direct investment (in graph 12) of the report from the Commission ‘Economic reform: report on the functioning of Community product and capital market’ (2). Is the Commission also able to provide a series including reinvested earnings? Will the Commission also give the figures for each individual EU Member State that is not yet in the euro?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(17 July 2003)

Tables 1 and 2 present data on the value in current prices of foreign direct investment (FDI) from different sources to various targets between 1996 and 2001. These are sent direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat. In particular, figures are provided for each Member State that is not yet part of the euro area. As in the previous year, the eurozone and the non-eurozone Member States are identified in order to arrive at statistics that are comparable to those presented in graph 12 of the report from the Commission ‘Economic reform: Report on the functioning of Community product and capital markets’.

Table 1 presents data on the value in current prices of foreign direct investment flows excluding reinvested earnings (the standard approach Eurostat uses in its annual reports and in the Cardiff Report).

Table 2 presents data on the value in current prices of foreign direct investment flows including reinvested earnings. Figures are missing for some individual countries over several years; this is due to the fact that confidenciality, methodological and timeliness issues prevent some individual Member States from providing detailed information, particularly concerning reinvested earnings. The future approval of a Regulation concerning the balance of payments provision of information from Member States should improve the availability of FDI data, as this Regulation will replace the present ‘gentlement agreement’ between the Member States and the Commission.

Among the investor sources listed in both tables, ‘Extra EU 15’ means the world beyond the 15 Member States.

In both tables, for consistency, almost all figures shown are outflows recorded from the source investor. The only exception is FDI flows from the rest of the world, where inflows are used as recorded by the target.

----

(1)OJ C 160 E, 4.7.2002, p. 171.

(2)  COM(2001) 736 final.

----
**Exhibit        32**

**CERTIFICATION        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT        TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                               |   |   |                                                                             |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                August 9,                2007 |   |   | /s/ Kenneth                Plotkin                                          |
|                                                    |   |   | Kenneth                      PlotkinChief                      Executive Officer |
|                                               |   |   |                                                                             |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                  |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | /s/ Gerald                Tucciarone                                                                                             |
|        |   |   | Gerald                        TucciaroneChief                        Financial Officer, Treasurerand                        Secretary |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                  |

----
IN RE A.A.P.

No. COA08-674.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 18, 2008.

Certification Date December 8, 2008.

Appeal from Wilkes (04JT157, 04JT158, 04JT159).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; Reversed and remanded in part.
```

                                                                                                       Exhibit 23.1

                                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration  Statements  (Forms S-8,  No.  333-42422,  No.
333-89913,  No.  333-66767,  and No.  333-66769)  pertaining  to the Tropical  Sportswear  Int'l  Corporation  2000
Long-Term  Incentive  Plan; the Tropical  Sportswear  Int'l  Corporation  Employee Stock Option Plan as Amended and
Restated;  the Tropical  Sportswear  Int'l  Corporation  Non-Employee  Director  Stock Option Plan; and the Apparel
International  Group,  Inc.  1996 Stock Option Plan,  of our report  dated  November 19, 2002,  with respect to the
consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of Tropical  Sportswear Int'l  Corporation  included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 28, 2002.

                                                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tampa, Florida
December 19, 2002
```
# The Immigration (European Economic Area) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

Statutory Instruments

# 2014 No. 1451

Immigration

# The Immigration (European Economic Area) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

4th June 2014

Laid before Parliament

6th June 2014

Coming into force

1st July 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.2.2017) by The Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (S.I. 2016/1052), reg. 1(2)(b), **Sch. 4 para. 1**
In the Matter of the WILL OF Junior Warren BEANE, Deceased appealed by Joan K. Beane.

No. 152P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

R. Kenneth Helms, Jr., James Allen Lee, Monroe, for Joan Beane.

Stephan R. Futrell, Rockingham, for Brad Denson, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of April 2008 by Propounder in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
----

(2004/C 33 E/098)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1234/03

by Miquel Mayol i Raynal (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(2 April 2003)

Subject:   Closure of Euskaldunon Egunkaria

On Thursday 20 February this year the Basque newspaper Euskaldunon Egunkaria was closed down as a precautionary measure by High Court Judge Juan del Olmo. In an unprecedented act since democracy came to Spain, this judge, the Public Prosecutor and the Interior Minister himself drew up a joint press statement supporting the closure of this periodical — the only entirely Basque-language newspaper — because of alleged links to the ETA terrorist movement, based on some documents that were seized by the national police in the 1990s. More than a month has passed since these events, and five of the ten people who were arrested by judicial decree are still in detention, although no decisive and irrefutable evidence has been provided of their links with the terrorist movement. Moreover, some of them have accused the Spanish police authorities of torture, a detail which certainly does not make the path of peace in the troubled Basque Country any easier. This action against one of the communications media has greatly damaged the Basque language and culture and the citizens of this region, who are perplexed to observe once again a kind of action more typical of the Franco era which still haunts people's memories. The Spanish Government should not overlook or underestimate the demonstrations of support and solidarity that those who worked for this newspaper have received from various political groups, all kinds of associations, trade unions, religious communities and many others in the whole Basque Country, Catalonia and the rest of Europe.

The closure of Euskaldunon Egunkaria is of enormous significance and clearly affects a constitutional right, the right of citizens to information, enshrined in Article 20 of the Spanish Constitution and Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

Does the Commission consider that the Spanish authorities have violated inalienable principles of the acquis communautaire?

Does the Commission consider that there has been a clear and repeated infringement of the presumption of innocence?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(5 May 2003)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to the answers to Written Questions E-0672/03 by Mr Borghezio and E-0641/03 by Mr Ebner (1).

----

(1)OJ C 280 E, 21.11.2003, p. 75.

----
# C_2023134EN.01001802.xml

| 17.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/18

---

Action brought on 28 February 2023 — Iceland Foods v EUIPO — Íslandsstofa (Promote Iceland) e.a. (ICELAND)

(Case T-105/23)

(2023/C 134/25)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Iceland Foods Ltd (Deeside, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Vos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Íslandsstofa (Promote Iceland) (Reykjavik, Iceland), Iceland, SA — Business Iceland (Reykjavik)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ICELAND — European Union trade mark No 2 673 374

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 December 2022 in Case R 1238/2019-G

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | remit the case to the Cancellation Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

remit the case to the Cancellation Division;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of this application and order Íslandsstofa (Promote Iceland), the Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs and SA — Business Iceland to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of this application and order Íslandsstofa (Promote Iceland), the Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs and SA — Business Iceland to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
[LETTERHEAD OF GRIMSLEY, WHITE & COMPANY]



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





The Board of Directors
High Country Bancorp, Inc.


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(File Nos. 333-40385 and 333-69053) on Form S-8 of High Country Bancorp, Inc. of
our report  dated August 13, 2003  relating to the  consolidated  statements  of
financial  condition of High Country Bancorp,  Inc. as of June 30, 2003, and the
related  consolidated  statements of income,  equity and cash flows for the year
then ended,  which  report  appears in the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended June 30, 2003 of High Country Bancorp, Inc.



                                         /s/ Grimsley, White & Company
                                         Grimsley, White & Company
September 26, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000930803
<NAME>                          Hauppauge Digital, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         3,543,620
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,316,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                   165,000
<INVENTORY>                                    13,588,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,610,112
<PP&E>                                         1,525,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (633,115)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,987,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,506,425
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       92,909
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,387,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,987,135
<SALES>                                        41,568,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               41,568,846
<CGS>                                          32,262,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,033,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23,569
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,248,619
<INCOME-TAX>                                   515,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,733,619
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,733,619
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.18




</TABLE>
STATE v. SALAZAR.

No. COA07-893.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 17, 2008.

Certification Date July 7, 2008.

Appeal from Guilford (04CRS85511).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.