alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          54,731                  81,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,146                  43,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,964                   2,659
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,307                 126,426
<PP&E>                                         104,643                  47,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,422                   3,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,631                 225,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,857                  45,012
<BONDS>                                        158,233                 158,022
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           114                      90
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,757                  15,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,631                 225,982
<SALES>                                        276,471                 161,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,471                 161,169
<CGS>                                          242,735                 141,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  242,735                 141,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,813                  12,830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,235)                (18,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,235)                (18,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                   (514)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,235)                (18,574)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.13)                  (2.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.13)                  (2.08)


</TABLE>
COSTON v. SMITHFIELD PACKING, INC.

No. COA08-355.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 605852).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
(September 26, 2005)

#### Joseph Acito, Respondent, v Mary Jane Acito, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 156]

In an action, inter alia, for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dillon, J.), entered May 11, 2004, as denied those branches of her motion which were for summary judgment on her counterclaims for a divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (1) and (6), and for pendente lite relief, and, by permission, from so much of the order as granted the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment declaring the parties’ separation agreement invalid to the extent of directing a hearing to aid in the disposition of the cross motion.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the. defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment on her counterclaim for a divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (1) and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the *1045defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment on her counterclaim for a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (1). The defendant made a prima facie showing that she was entitled to a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, which was founded upon the plaintiffs physical assault of the defendant on January 1, 2001. On December 17, 2001, the plaintiff pleaded guilty to attempted assault in the third degree in violation of Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.00. In opposition to the defendant’s motion, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant pendente lite child support *(see Macagnone v Macagnone,*7 AD3d 680 [2004]; *Cooper v Cooper,*7 AD3d 746 [2004]). “The appropriate remedy for any perceived inequity in a pendente lite award is a prompt trial” *(McDermott v McDermott,*4 AD3d 457 [2004]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ, concur.
EXHIBIT 99.2

             STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Ralph W. Dunham, is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Mystic Financial, Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by
the Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results
                of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
                periods covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the
Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the
Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to
Section   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

September 11, 2002                     /s/Ralph W. Dunham
------------------                     ------------------
Dated                                  Ralph W. Dunham


<PAGE>


             STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Anthony J. Patti, is the Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of Mystic Financial, Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by
the Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            C)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            D)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results
                of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
                periods covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the
Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the
Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It
is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

September 11, 2002                     /s/Anthony J. Patti
------------------                     -------------------
Dated                                  Anthony J. Patti

<PAGE>
Leslie CRANE v. Edward KEATING.

No. 222P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Patrick S. McCroskey, Steven Kropelnicki, Jr., Asheville, for Keating.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of June 2008 by Plaintiff to Amend Record on Appeal:

*740"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION v. MALLORY.

No. 130A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 29, 2008.

Michelle Massingale, Charlotte, for Homeowners Asso.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of September 2008 by Respondent for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Respondent (Mallory) shall have up to and including the 3rd day of October 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of September 2008."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1045/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1045/2014 of 3 October 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1045/2014                     

# of 3 October 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 531 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 531

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To repeal section 10(f) of Public Law 93-531, commonly known as the 
                          ``Bennett Freeze''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF THE BENNETT FREEZE.

    Section 10(f) of Public Law 93-531 (25 U.S.C. 640d-9(f)) is 
repealed.

            Passed the Senate September 18 (legislative day, September 
      17), 2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 531

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To repeal section 10(f) of Public Law 93-531, commonly known as the 
                          ``Bennett Freeze''.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          95,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      957
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               390,743
<PP&E>                                      11,163,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                 902,351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,841,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          360,776
<BONDS>                                      4,707,744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,335,884
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,841,809
<SALES>                                        827,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               838,559
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  310,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             160,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                159,374
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            159,374
<DISCONTINUED>                                  45,807
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (451)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   147,619
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11


</TABLE>
Amendment to the Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan



  
 Exhibit 10.28

 AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 AFFINIA GROUP HOLDINGS INC. 

2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 (Effective August 25, 2010) 
 THIS AMENDMENT to the Affinia Group
Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), is hereby adopted and approved by the Board of Directors of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) as of August 25, 2010. 

R E C I T A L S 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in accordance under Section 15(a) of the Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of August 25, 2010, as set forth below: 
 A M E N D M E N T 
  

	1.	Shares Subject to the Plan. The first sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby deleted and the following sentence shall be inserted in amended to read in
its entirety as follows: 

 “The total number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan is 300,000.”

  

	2.	The Plan shall in all other respects remain in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this amendment as of the 25th day of August, 2010. 
 AFFINIA GROUP HOLDINGS INC. 

	
	
	By: /s/ Thomas H. Madden
	 Name: Thomas H. Madden

Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
## 1999 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

5-14-1999 

# C a r t e r v . C it y of P hi l a del phi a

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ock e t 98-1581

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1999 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" C a r t e r v . C it y of P hi l a de lp hi a " (1999). 1999 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 126. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999/126

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 98-1581

Re: Carter v. City of Philadelphia, et al.

The following modifications have been made to the Court's Opinion issued on April 28, 1999 in the above-entitled appeal and wi ll appear as part of the final version of the opinion:

Page 2, after "Susan F. Burt, Esquire" de lete "Berlinger & Small"

Page 6, line 6, after "Office" insert "pu rsuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)"

Page 12, third line of the firs t full paragraph, after "reasons" insert "-- explaining how it balanced the competing concerns that inform

our interpretation of Rule 54(b) --"

Page 13, in the third paragraph , line 4, change the year from "1985" to "1995"

Page 25, line 7 of the first fu ll paragraph, delete "prosecution" and insert "litigation"

Page 26, n. 53, line 3 "States' " should be "states'" and again at the end.

Page 28, last line on page, del ete "11 S. Ct. at 1938 n.2"

Page 29, next to last line of f irst paragraph after "1983" the comma should be deleted and a hyphen inserted.

Page 31, n.61, add the followin g sentence at the end: "To the extent that Carter's claims are predicated on inadequ ate training, supervision or discipline of police officers (as opposed to assistant district attorneys), Carter will be required to establish suff icient de juen or de facto control by the defendants to supporting a finding of causation.

### 98-1581

Carter v. City of Philadelphia, et al.

Very truly yours,
/s/P. Douglas Sisk, C lerk
----

(2004/C 65 E/118)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1964/03

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(13 June 2003)

Subject:   Proceedings under Article 226 of the EC Treaty for failure to comply with Article 292 of the EC Treaty

Could the Commission list all the legal proceedings that it has initiated against Member States over the past five years under Article 226 of the EC Treaty for failure to comply with Article 292 of the EC Treaty which provides that Member States shall not submit a dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the EC Treaty to any method of settlement other than those provided for therein?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(16 July 2003)

In the last five years, the Commission has opened two infringement proceedings for failure to comply with Article 292 of the EC Treaty. The infringement proceedings were launched against Ireland. For further information on this subject, the Commission refers to its reply to oral question H-0256/03 made by the Honourable Member during question time at Parliament's May 2003 session (1).

----

(1)  Written reply, 13.5.2003.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 491 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 491

    To clarify the rules of origin for certain textile and apparel 
                               products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 6, 2007

  Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Bunning, and Mr. Byrd) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To clarify the rules of origin for certain textile and apparel 
                               products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RULES OF ORIGIN FOR CERTAIN TEXTILE AND APPAREL PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 334(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Uruguay Round 
Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3592(b)(2)(A)(i)) is amended by inserting 
``(except 6303.12.00 and 6303.92.20)'' after ``6303''.
    (b) Certain Finishing Operations.--Section 334(b)(2)(C) of the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3592(b)(2)(C)) is amended by 
inserting ``(except goods classified under heading 6303.92.20)'' after 
``6303.92''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on 
or after the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN RE J.C.

No. COA08-727.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 2, 2008.

Certification Date December 22, 2008.

Appeal from Brunswick (07J176T).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.