alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMERIQUEST
MORTGAGE
COMPANY

LOGO



                               AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE

January 12, 1998

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1997,  Ameriquest Mortgage Company has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for Mortgage  Bankers.  From January 1, 1997 through  December 31, !997,
Ameriquest  Mortgage  Company  had in effect a  fidelity  bond in the  amount of
$10,000,000 and for the same period, an errors and omissions policy in an amount
ranging from $4,100,000 to $6,200,000.


/s/ Jule J. Keen
Jule J. Keen
Executive Vice President of Servicing Division

/s/ Shawna R. Ogilvie
Shawna R. Ogilvie
Vice President of Servicing Division

/s/ John P Grazer
John P. Grazer
Executive Vice President
And Acting Chief Financial Officer


505 S. Main Street. Suite 6000, Orange,  California  92868-4509.  (714) 543-5262
FAX (714) 542-3059
I N T H E S U P R EM E C O U R T

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2024 ND 105

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Mitchell Keith Reller, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20230393

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable 

Dann E. Greenwood, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Amy Pikovsky, Assistant State’s Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; 

submitted on brief.

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
1

State v. Reller

No. 20230393

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Mitchell Reller appeals from a district court’s judgment entered following a jury 

verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition. On appeal, Reller asserts there was 

insufficient evidence for the jury to find him guilty of the charge of gross sexual imposition, 

and the court erred in permitting evidence of his prior criminal history.

[¶2] We conclude the evidence was sufficient to support the criminal judgment and 

decline to address Reller’s argument relating to the admission of his prior criminal history 

as he failed to properly preserve the issue for appeal and did not brief the issue as an 

obvious error to this Court. State v. Rourke, 2017 ND 102, ¶ 8, 893 N.W.2d 176 (This 

Court “need not exercise our discretion to notice obvious error in an appeal when the 

defendant does not raise the issue of obvious error, because it is the defendant’s burden to 

show an obvious error that effects a substantial right.”). We summarily affirm under 

N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. 

Daniel J. Crothers 

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Douglas A. Bahr
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3597 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 

Referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

AN ACT 

To provide that funds allocated for community food projects 

for fiscal year 2008 shall remain available until September 30, 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

S 3597 RFH

1 SECTION 1. COMMUNITY FOOD PROJECTS. 

2 (a) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 4406(a)(7) 

3 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Pub4 lic Law 110–234; 122 Stat. 1902) is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘Food and Nutrition Act of 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘Food 

6 Stamp Act of 1977’’. 

7 (b) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—Funds allocated under 

8 section 25(b) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 

9 2034(b)) for fiscal year 2008 shall remain available until 

10 September 30, 2009, to fund proposals solicited in fiscal 

11 year 2008. 

Passed the Senate September 25 (legislative day, 

September 17), 2008. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11(b)
                                                                               

                              ELECTROSCOPE, INC.
                                       
                                       
               COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                                       
                          AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)
                                       

                                                      For the Nine Months Ended 
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                     December 31,   December 31,
                                                         1996           1995    
                                                    ------------   ------------

NET INCOME (LOSS)                                    $(1,269,812)     $(863,721)
                                                    ------------   ------------
                                                    ------------   ------------

SHARES USED IN SHARE COMPUTATION-
 Common stock shares outstanding (weighted average)    4,893,979      3,686,665

 Treasury stock effect of common stock and
  equivalents issued within one year of the public
  offering at prices less than the public offering 
  price                                                   56,364         73,387
                                                    ------------   ------------
   Shares used in computation                          4,950,343      3,760,052
                                                    ------------   ------------
                                                    ------------   ------------

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE AND
 COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE                             $     (0.26)     $   (0.23)
                                                    ------------   ------------
                                                    ------------   ------------

                                       21
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc. on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2004, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission, we, John Q. Hammons, Chief Executive Officer, and
      Paul E. Muellner, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:

            1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operation of John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc. and will be retained by John
      Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its Staff upon request.

Dated:  May 14, 2004

                                                  /s/ John Q. Hammons
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  John Q. Hammons

                                                  /s/ Paul E. Muellner
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Paul E. Muellner

                                       26
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Neithercut,Chief Executive Officer of Equity Residential, general partner of ERPOP,certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.

 

 

 
| /s/ David J. Neithercut |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David J. Neithercut     |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| of Equity Residential   |   |
| May 8, 2006        |   |

 

----
# Council Decision, taken by common accord with the President-elect of the Commission, of 5 September 2014 adopting the list            of the other persons whom the Council proposes for appointment as Members of the Commission (2014/648/EU, Euratom) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision,                     

# taken by common accord with the President-elect of the Commission,

# of 5 September 2014

# adopting the list of the other persons whom the Council proposes for appointment as Members of the Commission

# (2014/648/EU, Euratom) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by 2014/716/EU, Euratom: Council Decision, taken by common accord with the President-elect of the Commission, of 15 October 2014                                 adopting the list of the other persons whom the Council proposes for appointment as Members of the Commission, repealing and                                 replacing Decision 2014/648/EU, Euratom.
----

----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:   /s/ Amit Meridor ----------------------------Amit MeridorChief Executive Officer |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:   /s/ Eran Rotem ---------------------------Eran RotemChief Financial Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Phillip A. MULLINS, III. Appealed by Diane and Jacques Geitner.

No. 238P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Robert King, III, Greensboro, for Diane Geitner and Jacques Geitner.

L. Bruce McDaniel, Raleigh, for Estate of Mullins, et al.

*263Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 643 S.E.2d 599.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of May 2007 by Petitioners (Diane & Jacques Geitner) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
# C_2023035EN.01006402.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/64

---

Action brought on 11 November 2022 — FOF v Commission

(Case T-688/22)

(2023/C 35/80)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: FOF — Fox Oil Fund, Lda (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020, on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020, on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law which, in essence, are identical or similar to those raised in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.

---
Exhibit 10.34

                                   AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                               AMF BOWLING, INC.
                           1998 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

     THIS AMENDMENT to the AMF Bowling, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the
"Plan") is made pursuant to the authority under Section 10 of the Plan for the
Board of Directors to amend the Plan. The Plan is hereby amended by deleting the
first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Plan and replacing it with the following
new sentence:

     The total number of shares of Common Stock reserved and available for
     grant under the Plan shall be four million shares (4,000,000).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 416 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 416

            For the relief of Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2007

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            For the relief of Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any 
order, for the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop shall be deemed to 
have been lawfully admitted to, and remained in, the United States, and 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1255).
    (b) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) shall apply 
only if the applications for issuance of immigrant visas or the 
applications for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees 
within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
immigrant visas to Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 2, during the 
current or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the aliens' birth 
under section 202(e) or 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1152(e), 1153(a)), as applicable.
                                 <all>
```
UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ASS'N v. PORTRAIT HOMES CONST. CO.

No. COA06-746.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CVS5035).

Cases reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed in part, affirmed in part and remanded.
CHRISTOPHER v. NC STATE UNIVERSITY.

No. 246P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Dahr Joseph Tanoury, Assistant Attorney General, for NC State University.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 661 S.E.2d 36.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of August 2008 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."
STATE v. WEST.

No. COA06-1487.

Court of appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 18, 2007.

Certification Date October 8, 2007.

Appeal from New Hanover affirmed (03CRS21888, 03CRS21889, 03CRS21891, 03CRS21892).

Case reported without published opinion affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          42,004
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  515,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,576
<INVENTORY>                                     67,699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               841,404
<PP&E>                                         896,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                 183,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,338,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          557,046
<BONDS>                                        623,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,954
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,003,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,338,546
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,733,469
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,381,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                21,591
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (190,826)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,097)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (185,729)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (185,729)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12.(a).1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Yosef Shiran, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Tefron Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.   disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

     a.   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial data; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: April 19, 2005


/s/ Yosef Shiran
----------------
Yosef Shiran
Chief Executive Officer
#### Imad Abdellatif, Appellant, v Colline Khoukaz, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[801 NYS2d 870]

*1279Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered August 13, 2004. The order granted the motion of defendant Colline Khoukaz for summary judgment and dismissed the amended complaint against her.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the amended complaint against defendant Colline Khoukaz is reinstated.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that the negligence of Colline Khoukaz (defendant) was a proximate cause of the injuries he sustained when he slipped and fell on ice on the driveway outside the building in which he rented an apartment. Specifically, plaintiff alleged that defendant was negligent in failing to replace a missing downspout near the driveway, which allowed water to accumulate and freeze. We conclude that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against her *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). “Liability for a dangerous condition on property is predicated upon occupancy, ownership, control or a special use of [the] premises. . . . The existence of one or more of these elements is sufficient to give rise to a duty of care” *(Balsam v Delma Eng’g Corp.,*139 AD2d 292, 296 [1988], *lv dismissed in part and denied in part*73 NY2d 783 [1988]). Here, defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that she did not exercise control over the downspout and relevant portion of the premises. Indeed, the deposition testimony of defendant establishes that, although she transferred ownership of the property to a relative who resides in Syria, defendant collected the rent, was the only mortgagor and made the mortgage payments, made certain repairs on the property herself and paid for other repairs out of her own pocket without reimbursement from the record owner, and in fact attempted to sell the property. Thus, defendant failed to meet her initial burden of establishing as a matter of law that she did not “control[ ] the premises at the time of plaintiffs injury” *(Arce v 1681 Realty Holding Corp.,*276 AD2d 328, 328 [2000]; *see Ritto v Goldberg,*27 NY2d 887, 889 [1970]; *see also Brown v O’Connor,*193 AD2d 1088 [1993]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Pine and Hayes, JJ.