alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 32(b)


  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
     As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, James M. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of Solutia Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
                  Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the
                  "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 28, 2007

                                         /s/ James M. Sullivan
                                         ---------------------
                                         James M. Sullivan
                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc. and will
be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Monterey Bay Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, C.
Edward Holden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                Monterey Bay Bancorp, Inc.




Date:    August 9, 2002                         By:      /s/ C. Edward Holden
                                                         --------------------
                                                         C. Edward Holden
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. WILSON.

No. COA07-1465.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Carteret (06CRS51020, 06CRS6058).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
William R. BURNETTE and wife, Sandra H. Burnett, Gene A. Mozingo and wife, Sharon H. Mozingo, Thomas L. Dupree and wife, Margaret S. Dupree, Robert H. Pleasants and wife, Margaret J. Pleasants, Lawrence M. Pierce and wife, Rita L. Pierce, Kenneth S. Wadsworth and wife, Jean L. Wadsworth, Marvin D. Turner and wife, Anne S. Turner, Thomas W. Fleetwood and wife, Diane F. Fleetwood, John D. Booth and wife, Erlene S. Booth, and Robert T. Hinnant and wife, Sandra I. Hinnant v. CITY OF GOLDSBORO.

No. 73P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

James E. Eldridge, Wilmington, for William R. Burnette et al.

W. Harrell Everett, Jr., Goldsboro, Darrell K. Brown, for City of Goldsboro.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of February 2008 by Petitioners in this matter for discretionary review of the *738decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
TEAGUE v. NCDOT et al.

No. 281P06-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2008.

Tina Krasner, Assistant Attorney General, for NCDOT.

C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: 177 N.C.App. 215, 628 S.E.2d 395.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of June 2008 by Petitioner Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of June 2008."

EDMUNDS, J., recused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         152,545
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,126
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,632
<PP&E>                                       2,747,081
<DEPRECIATION>                               (273,395)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,784,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,514
<BONDS>                                      1,237,623
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    393,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,784,866
<SALES>                                        341,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               344,047
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,504
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,346
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,716
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration
      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43248) and (ii) the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-56122) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000
      Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Active Power, Inc. of our report dated January
      15, 2002, with respect to the financial statements of Active Power, Inc.
      included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Austin, Texas  March 12, 2002
STATE v. Henry ROBERTSON-EL.

No. 334P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of July 2008 by Defendant for Writ of Mandamus:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EDISON
MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         483,215
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               563,709
<PP&E>                                       3,468,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                 188,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,264,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,675
<BONDS>                                      2,728,189
<COMMON>                                        64,130
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     788,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,264,112
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               422,584
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                109,914
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,749
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (13,126)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,039
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Faith JONES v. Thomas DALTON, M.D., Wilmington Anesthesiologists, L.L.P., and Wilmington Anesthesiologists, P.L.L.C.

No. 229P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Carl W. Thurman, III, Jennifer J. Slusser, for Jones.

Wayne K. Maiorano, Samuel G. Thompson, Raleigh, for Dalton, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of May 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."

MARTIN, J., recused.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Small Research Grants (RO3s).                    

*Date:*                         September 6, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NIH-NIAMS Institute, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 30814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Eric H. Brown, MS, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal & Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 824, MSC 4872, Bethesda, MD 20892-4872 (301) 594-4955,                         *browneri@mail.nih.gov.*
      ( print page 52408)    
This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 26, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-17463  Filed 9-1-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
STATE v. Kenneth Wayne MAREADY.

No. 32A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 23, 2008.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Counsel, David Saacks, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of April 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Maready) shall have up to and including the 24th day of May 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of April 2008."
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1063/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1063/2014 of 7 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for whiting in VIII by vessels            flying the flag of Belgium         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1063/2014                     

# of 7 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for whiting in VIII by vessels flying the flag of Belgium

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1522

HERBERT HAYES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEMMA POWER SYSTEM, LLC; EDDIE HACELTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-312-5-F)

Submitted: September 8, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Allen Holt Gwyn, Jr., CONNER, GWYN

& SCHENCK, P.L.L.C., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Herbert Hayes appeals the district court’s orders granting

Respondents’ motion for summary judgment in his employment

discrimination action and denying reconsideration of that order. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hayes

v. Gemma Power Sys., L.L.C., No. CA-01-312-5-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 19,

2003 & Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1325/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1325/2014 of 10 December 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for cod in Skagerrak by            vessels flying the flag of Sweden         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1325/2014                     

# of 10 December 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for cod in Skagerrak by vessels flying the flag of Sweden

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
# C_2023024EN.01005001.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/50

---

Action brought on 11 November 2022 — Lycatelcom v Commission

(Case T-685/22)

(2023/C 24/66)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Lycatelcom, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.

---
WAKE CARES, INC., et al. v. BOE, et al.

No. 230PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 29, 2008.

Robert N. Hunter, Jr., Greensboro, William Peaslee, Cary, for Wake Cares, Inc., et al.

Ann Majestic, Raleigh, Curtis H. Allen, III, for Wake Co. BOE.

Edwin M. Speas, Jr., Raleigh, for NC School Bd. Assn.

Christopher Z. Campbell, K. Dean Shatley, II, Asheville, for NC Council of School Attys.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of October 2008 by NC School Boards Association for leave to file Corrected Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of October 2008."