alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 21, 

2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00745-CR 

NO. 14-13-00746-CR

JAVIER CRUZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1371902 & 1350321

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated assault and assault of a family 

member. On August 13, 2013, the trial court sentenced appellant in accordance 

with the jury’s assessment of punishment at confinement for four years in the 

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, with the 

sentences to be served concurrently. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial 

and notice of appeal on both convictions. On October 22, 2013, the trial court 

granted a new trial for both offenses on punishment only. See Tex. R. App. P. 
2

21.1(b); see also State v. Davis, 349 S.W.3d 535, 537–38 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) 

(recognizing that the 2007 amendment to Rule 21 permits a trial court to grant a 

new trial on punishment only). 

On November 13, 2013, appellant filed a motion to dismiss his appeals for 

want of jurisdiction. Appellant asserts that the August 13, 2013, judgments of 

conviction are not final because the cases were restored to their position after the 

defendant was found guilty when the trial court granted a new trial on punishment. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 21.9(c); see also State v. Stewart, 282 S.W.3d 729, 740–41 

(Tex. App.—Austin 2009, no pet.).

After the new punishment trial was granted, appellant entered a plea bargain 

agreement with the State, providing for appellant to be sentenced to community 

supervision for five years in exchange for waiving his right to appeal the findings 

of guilt and punishment for these convictions. On October 25, 2013, the trial court 

signed a new certification of the defendant’s right of appeal in each case, stating 

that the defendant has waived the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), (f).

The appeals from the August 13, 2013, judgments have been rendered moot 

by the granting of a new trial on punishment. Moreover, in each case appellant has 

agreed to waive his right to appeal both the findings of guilt and the new sentences 

imposing community supervision. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over these 

appeals.

We grant appellant’s motion to dismiss and order these appeals dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jamison.

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
----

(2004/C 33 E/087)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0925/03

by Eluned Morgan (PSE) to the Commission

(24 March 2003)

Subject:   Via Baltica

Is it true that the Via Baltica will be constructed through sensitive wildlife sites in Poland? Will this road be receiving any European funding?

What assurances can the Commission give that environmental impact assessment work will be done before any construction work starts?

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17671]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act; Public Announcement

    Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409) [5 
U.S.C. 552b].

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m., Wednesday, September 7, 2005.

PLACE: 5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.

STATUS: Open.

 MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: The meeting is being held to discuss the 
budget proposal for the fiscal year 2007.

AGENCY CONTACT: Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States 
Parole Commission, (301) 492-5990.

    Dated: August 31, 2005.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-17671 Filed 9-1-05; 10:42 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
IN RE B.W.M.

No. COA08-1122.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 17, 2009.

Certification Date April 6, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (06JT659).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 382/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 382/2014 of 7 March 2014 supplementing Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament            and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for publication of supplements to the prospectus (Text with            EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 382/2014                     

# of 7 March 2014

# supplementing Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards                        for publication of supplements to the prospectus                     

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/979 of 14 March 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of the European Parliament                                 and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on key financial information in the summary of a prospectus,                                 the publication and classification of prospectuses, advertisements for securities, supplements to a prospectus, and the notification                                 portal, and repealing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 382/2014 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/301 (Text                                 with EEA relevance).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5183] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Memling's Portraits,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Frick Collection, New York, NY from on or about October 12, 2005 to on or about December 31, 2005, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B.                               ( print page 53267)                            Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, (telephone: (202) 453-8048). The address is Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                     

Dated: August 31, 2005. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 05-17805 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
# CE2004088EN.01032901.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/329 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/329

---

(2004/C 88 E/0334)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0611/03

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Commission

(3 March 2003)

Subject:   EU/Guinea-Bissau 1999-2003: cooperation, development, human rights, assistance, etc.

Subject:

For the years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 and with regard to Guinea-Bissau, can the Commission provide information on the following: What programmes have been or are being undertaken by the EU with Guinea-Bissau? What are the funds allocated? What is the expected duration of the individual programmes? What results have been obtained by the programmes, and what assessment has been made of their success or otherwise? What particular developments have characterised each of the programmes?

---
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 784/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 784/2014 of 15 July 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for haddock in Union and international            waters of VIb, XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Ireland         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 784/2014                     

# of 15 July 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for haddock in Union and international waters of VIb, XII and XIV by vessels flying                        the flag of Ireland                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
# CE2004078EN.01005701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/57

---

(2004/C 78 E/0056)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1937/03

by Mihail Papayannakis (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(13 June 2003)

Subject:   Corinth-Patras railway link

Subject:

Various local organisations have complained that no account has been taken of the special regional planning study on the Gulf of Corinth funded by the EU's Envireg programme in the construction of the new rail link between Corinth and Patras. Furthermore, the method generally adopted in such cases, namely the construction of tunnels and viaducts at a distance from the coast and built-up areas, has been completely ignored. Given that the construction of railways is a project of key importance for the region as a whole, would the Commission examine whether this project is being carried out in the most appropriate manner, so as to cause least damage to the environment?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(29 July 2003)

(29 July 2003)

The responsibility for the design and implementation of major infrastructure projects, such as the construction of a new railway, lies with the authorities in the Member State in accordance with the principles of decentralised management that apply to the Structural Funds. It is for these authorities to determine an appropriate balance between economic, societal and environmental considerations, and to ensure respect for regulatory requirements.

As concerns the railway Korinthos-Patras, the application submitted by the Greek authorities for European co-funding met all the required conditions, including those relating to environmental terms and conditions.

The study to which the Honourable Member refers dates back to the early nineties. It did not give rise to a legally binding spatial planning framework for the area covered by it, nor did it concern specifically the track design of the railway.

---
# CE2004078EN.01000801.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/8

---

(2004/C 78 E/0007)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3644/02

by Hanja Maij-Weggen (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 December 2002)

Subject:   Incarceration of Shaiboub

Subject:

Is the Commission aware of the case of Coptic Christian Shaiboub William Arsal who has been incarcerated since September 1998 in connection with the murders of two Christians in his village of El Kosheh? Is the Commission aware that the appeal lodged against this verdict has been pending for over two and a half years and that Shaiboub remains in prison to this date? And is it the Commission's opinion that this situation is in accordance with Article 2 of the Egypt-EU Association Agreement?

Can the Commission comment on any action it has taken on the case of Shaiboub William Arsal? Will the Commission use its influence to ensure that Shaiboub's appeal is heard swiftly and that all relevant evidence is made available to be thoroughly examined to ensure a just verdict?

---
STATE v. MOSES.

No. COA07-853.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 16, 2008.

Certification Date October 6, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (05CRS57750).

Case reported without published opinion. Judgment arrested.
STATE v. BRIDGES.

No. COA07-1326.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Rutherford (05CRS50129).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# C_2023329EN.01003801.xml

| 18.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/38

---

Action brought on 7 August 2023 — Lidl Digital International v EUIPO — Ningbo Hanyuan Lighting (Lamps)

(Case T-471/23)

(2023/C 329/56)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Digital International GmbH & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde and C. Zimmer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ningbo Hanyuan Lighting Co. Ltd (Ningbo, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design (Lamps) — Community design No 5647708-0010

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 June 2023 in Case R 598/2022-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of these proceedings and the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of these proceedings and the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1), in conjunction with Article 65(1)(c), of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1), in conjunction with Article 65(1)(c), of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Notice is hereby given that Bay Partners LS Fund, L.P., 10600 N. De Anza Boulevard, Suite 100, Cupertino, CA 95014, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Bay Partners LS Fund, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt security financing to IPWireless, Inc. The financing is contemplated for operating expenses and for general corporate purposes. 

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Bay Partners SBIC II, L.P., John Freidenrich, Neal Dempsey, Christopher Noble and Loring Knoblauch, all Associates of Bay Partners LS Fund, L.P., own more than ten percent of IPWireless, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416. 

Dated: January 12, 2005. 

Jaime Guzman-Fournier, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Investment. 

[FR Doc. 05-1775 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
STATE v. DESMORE.

No. COA08-762.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 20, 2009.

Certification Date February 9, 2009.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS243197).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 521 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 521

  To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse and 
 customhouse located at 515 West First Street in Duluth, Minnesota, as 
 the ``Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United States Courthouse 
                           and Customhouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2007

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse and 
 customhouse located at 515 West First Street in Duluth, Minnesota, as 
 the ``Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United States Courthouse 
                           and Customhouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse and customhouse 
located at 515 West First Street in Duluth, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse and Customhouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse and customhouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to 
be a reference to the ``Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse and Customhouse''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust IV (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.








/s/ Randall D. HolmesName:
Randall D. HolmesTitle:
President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)Date:
May 12, 2010








/s/ Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
Jeffrey H. StrasbergTitle:
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
May 12, 2010