alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. William Abdullah MUSTAFA.

No. 176P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

William A. Mustafa, Pro Se.

LaToya B. Powell, Associate Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 14th day of April 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Alamance County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         Amendment to  Employment  Agreement  entered into as of the 27th day of
January,   1999  between  HydroChem  Industrial   Services,   Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation ("Employer"), and Gary Noto, an individual (the "Employee").

         WHEREAS, Employer, as the successor and assignee of Hydro Environmental
Services Limited Partnership,  a Delaware limited partnership,  and Employee are
parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of November 1, 1992 (the "Employment
Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, Employer and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement
as hereinafter provided;

         NOW  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the  premises and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereto agree as follows:

         1. At the  beginning  of the last  line in  section  5  (a)(ii)  of the
Employment  Agreement,  the word "six"  shall be deleted  and the word  "twelve"
shall be substituted therefor.

         2. Immediately  after the last word in clause (i) in the last paragraph
of section 5 (a) of the Employment  Agreement,  the phrase "which failure is not
corrected within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice thereof" shall
be added.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the date first hereinabove set forth.


EMPLOYER:

HYDROCHEM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.

By: 
         /s/ B. Tom Carter, Jr.
         ---------------------------------------
         B. Tom Carter, Jr., Chairman and
         Chief Executive Officer


EMPLOYEE:


         /s/ Gary Noto
         ---------------------------------------
         Gary Noto
# The Teachers' Superannuation (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2014 No.70

Education

# The Teachers' Superannuation (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

5th March 2014

Coming into operation

1st April 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.4.2015) by The Teachers Superannuation (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2015 (S.R. 2015/69), regs. 1, **10**
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 521 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 521

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse and 
 customhouse located at 515 West First Street in Duluth, Minnesota, as 
 the ``Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United States Courthouse 
                           and Customhouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse and customhouse 
located at 515 West First Street in Duluth, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse and Customhouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse and customhouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to 
be a reference to the ``Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse and Customhouse''.

            Passed the Senate April 10, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 521

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse and 
 customhouse located at 515 West First Street in Duluth, Minnesota, as 
 the ``Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United States Courthouse 
                           and Customhouse''.
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Steven L. Vick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Steven L. Vick



Steven L. Vick
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2003
CARL and Eilber v. STATE OF NC.

No. 432P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2009.

Donald H. Beskind, Raleigh, J. Martin Futrell, for Carl and Eilber.

David Dreifus, Edwin M. Speas, Thomas K. Lindgren, Raleigh, for MedAmerica Ins. Co.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of September 2008 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion for Stay Dissolved by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of February 2009."
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Kirk B. Davis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Symphonix Devices, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Symphonix Devices, Inc.



By:

/s/ Kirk B. DavisName: Kirk B. DavisTitle: President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 14, 2003




I, Terence J. Griffin, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Symphonix Devices, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Symphonix Devices, Inc.



By:

/s/ Terence J. GriffinName: Terence J. GriffinTitle:  Vice President Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 14, 2003
# C_2023271EN.01001402.xml

| 31.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 4 April 2023 — Hauser Weinimport GmbH v Freistaat Bayern

(Case C-216/23, Hauser Weinimport)

(2023/C 271/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hauser Weinimport GmbH

Defendant: Freistaat Bayern

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 3(4)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘alcohol’ also includes a drink which contains alcohol and is not a grapevine product within the meaning of Article 3(4)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 3(4)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘alcohol’ also includes a drink which contains alcohol and is not a grapevine product within the meaning of Article 3(4)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014?

| 2. | Does ‘added’ within the meaning of Article 3(4)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 mean that the alcoholic strength of the end product must have increased by comparison with the grapevine product used in accordance with Article 3(4)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does ‘added’ within the meaning of Article 3(4)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 mean that the alcoholic strength of the end product must have increased by comparison with the grapevine product used in accordance with Article 3(4)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014?

| 3. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, is the first sentence of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014, read in conjunction with Annex I(1)(b)(ii) thereto, to be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘flavouring foodstuff’ includes an alcohol-containing drink within the meaning of Question 1? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, is the first sentence of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014, read in conjunction with Annex I(1)(b)(ii) thereto, to be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘flavouring foodstuff’ includes an alcohol-containing drink within the meaning of Question 1?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 (OJ 2014 L 84, p. 14).

---
STATE v. HERNANDEZ-MADRID.

No. COA04-294-2.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2008.

Certification Date January 5, 2009.

Appeal from Wake (02CRS209, 02CRS51220, 02CRS51222, 02CRS51225).

Case reported without published opinion. No Error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,384
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,006
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 18,835
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             0
<LOANS>                                     89,179
<ALLOWANCE>                                    206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,169
<DEPOSITS>                                  96,501
<SHORT-TERM>                                     0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,005
<LONG-TERM>                                  8,900
<COMMON>                                     1,220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             121,169
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,795
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              296
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                23
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,114
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,045
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,143
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          971
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                436
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     436
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   262
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                3.48
<LOANS-NON>                                      0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    73
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               215
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   11
<RECOVERIES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              206
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           206
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,190
<INVENTORY>                                     17,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,328
<PP&E>                                       2,719,465
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,245,462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,776,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          180,193
<BONDS>                                        987,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,007
<OTHER-SE>                                     569,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,776,130
<SALES>                                        273,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               275,090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               365,890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,941
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (246,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (83,509)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (162,979)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (162,979)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.62)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSHUA STOKES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 229 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of November, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 10.2   Promissory Note Between Floridino's Inc. and

               Raffles Toho Inc.


                         PROMISSORY NOTE

On the 31st day of August 1999, Floridino's Inc., agrees to pay
Raffles Toho, Inc., One Hundred seventeen thousand three hundred
forty dollars and no cents ($117,340.00) at the rate of 8.25
percent per annum.  A balloon payment will be due on the 1st day
of September, 2000.



                                  ____________________________
                                  Nick Pirgousis, President
                                  Floridino's Inc.
Exhibit 99.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned executive officer of Community Investors Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB for the
period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                              /s/Robert W. Siegel
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Name: Robert W. Siegel
                                              Title: Assistant Vice President,
                                              Controller and Treasurer

Date: February 14, 2003
STATE of North Carolina v. Gregory ROBINSON, Jr.

No. 250P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Having reviewed petitioner's materials in the above captioned petition (COAPO8-190) on 26 August 2008, the Court *ex mero motu* directs the state to file a response in this matter. The state shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to file and serve its response.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 26th day of August, 2008.
STATE of North Carolina v. Rigoberto ROSALES-VILLA.

No. 214P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Rigoberto Rosales-Villa, Pro Se.

LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 6th day of May 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of May 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
BLUE RIDGE COMPANY, L.L.C. v. The TOWN OF PINEVILLE, North Carolina.

No. 101P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Roy H. Michaux, Jr., John H. Carmichael, Charlotte, for Blue Ridge Co.

Robin Tatum Currin, Andrew J. Petesch, Raleigh, for Town of Pineville.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 655 S.E.2d 843.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 24th day of March 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify
that this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.



                              By: /s/ Larry D. Smith
                                  ----------------------------------------
                                  Name:    Larry D. Smith
                                  Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer



                              By: /s/ Frances Pasquale
                                  ----------------------------------------
                                  Name:    Frances Pasquale
                                  Title:   Chief Financial Officer

Date: September 29, 2003
# CE2004065EN.01005301.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/53

---

(2004/C 65 E/052)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1186/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds from the FIFG by the municipality of Ancona

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Ancona, urgently need to use European funds to support structural measures in the sector of fisheries, acquaculture and the processing and marketing of the relevant products,

can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Ancona has submitted projects for the FIFG? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Ancona has submitted projects for the FIFG?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Ancona has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Ancona has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---