alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

                    STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                  FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 

MONTH                                           SHARES OUTSTANDING AT MONTH END
-----                                           -------------------------------
<S>                    <C>                          <C>
Sept 96                                               15,978,537
Oct 96                                                15,978,537
Nov 96                                                16,070,773
Dec 96                  16,626,655                    16,626,655
Jan 97                  16,635,155                    16,635,155
Feb 97                  16,635,155                    16,635,155
Mar 97                  17,851,214                    17,851,214
                        ----------                  ------------
4 and 7-month totals    67,748,179                   115,776,026

Weighted
Average Shares          16,937,045                    16,539,432

Net Loss               ($3,622,584)                  ($5,324,319)

Loss per Weighted
Average Share               ($0.21)                       ($0.32)

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Leada Tak Tai Li, the
Chief Financial Officer of CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



1.      The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this statement this 15th day of October, 2012.



| | /s/ Leada Tak Tai Li                        
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Leada Tak Tai Li                            
| | Chief Financial Officer                     
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The forgoing certification is being furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000930548
<NAME> RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,191
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,191
<PP&E>                                       1,313,702
<DEPRECIATION>                               (120,973)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,377,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,252
<BONDS>                                        728,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           389
<OTHER-SE>                                     472,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,377,074
<SALES>                                         53,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,063
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,097
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,097
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         ALL-AMERICAN SPORTPARK, INC.
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of All-American SportPark, Inc. for the period ending March 31, 2003:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of All-
American SportPark, Inc.






/s/ Kirk Hartle
Kirk Hartle
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to All-American SportPark, Inc.
and will be retained by All-American SportPark, Inc.and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
# C_2023179EN.01007301.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/73

---

Action brought on 5 April 2023 — FFPE Council section v Council

(Case T-179/23)

(2023/C 179/101)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: European Civil Service Federation Council section (FFPE Council section) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare this action admissible and well founded;
  and consequently, |
| --- | --- |

—

declare this action admissible and well founded;

and consequently,

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay token damages of EUR 1 for the non-material damage allegedly suffered; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay token damages of EUR 1 for the non-material damage allegedly suffered; and

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action for annulment directed against the Council’s note of 3 April 2023 informing the applicant of the findings and consequences of the verification procedure opened against it pursuant to the agreement of 28 March 2006 concluded between the Council of the European Union and the trade unions or professional organisations of the staff of the General Secretariat of the Council (‘the agreement’), the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging breach of the agreement and the engagement letter. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging breach of the agreement and the engagement letter.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging breach of the spirit of sincere cooperation resulting from the agreement, the principle of good administration, the principle of proportionality and the principle of performance in good faith of agreements. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging breach of the spirit of sincere cooperation resulting from the agreement, the principle of good administration, the principle of proportionality and the principle of performance in good faith of agreements.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging violation of the fundamental right to freedom of association. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging violation of the fundamental right to freedom of association.

---
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION




By signing below, each of the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her capacity as an officer of LSB Financial Corp. (the “Registrant”) that (i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.









Date:   August 14, 2009

/s/
Randolph F. WilliamsRandolph F. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:   August 14, 2009

/s/
Mary Jo DavidMary Jo DavidVice President and Chief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
LSB Financial Corp. and will be retained by LSB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2023286EN.01003601.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/36

---

Action brought on 17 June 2023 — Nehera and Others v EUIPO — Zdút (NEHERA PRAGUE)

(Case T-336/23)

(2023/C 286/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicants: Isabel Nehera (Sutton, Ontario, Canada), Natacha Sehnal (Montferrier-sur-Lez, France), Jean-Henri Nehera (Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada) (represented by: W. Woll, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ladislav Zdút (Bratislava, Slovakia)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark NEHERA PRAGUE — European Union trade mark No 12 671 681

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Forth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 April 2023 in Case R 1218/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and those incurred by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, including the necessary costs incurred in the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and those incurred by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, including the necessary costs incurred in the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal;

| — | order EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the applicants.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the right to a fair trial; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the right to a fair trial;

| — | Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                               AMF Bowling, Inc.
                   Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
                   (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       For the Year Ended December 31,
                                                            -----------------------------------------------------
                                                                 1998               1999                2000
                                                            -------------       -------------       -------------
<S>                                                         <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Shares
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding                                      59,717              69,922              83,592
                                                            =============       =============       =============

Net loss before extraordinary items                         $    (125,894)      $    (226,095)      $    (200,485)
                                                            =============       =============       =============
Net loss                                                    $    (125,894)      $    (162,234)      $    (200,485)
                                                            =============       =============       =============

Net loss per share, basic and diluted:
Net loss per share before extraordinary items (a)           $       (2.11)      $       (3.23)      $       (2.40)
Per share effect of extraordinary items (a)                             -                0.91                   -
                                                            -------------       -------------       -------------
Net loss per share (a)                                      $       (2.11)      $       (2.32)      $       (2.40)
                                                            =============       =============       =============
</TABLE>

  _________________
  (a) Outstanding stock options and warrants are not considered as their effect
      is antidilutive.
prsc20160630_10q.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2

 

On May 4, 2016, the term of the Employment Agreement dated March 24, 2014 between the Company and Herman Schwarz (the “Schwarz Employment Agreement”) was extended until July 31, 2016. On July 29, 2016, the term of the Schwarz Employment Agreement was further extended until September 30, 2016.
# C_2023173EN.01002901.xml

| 15.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/29

---

Action brought on 24 March 2023 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-193/23)

(2023/C 173/40)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court should

| — | declare that, by failing to establish and implement one single action plan or a set of action plans to address the priority pathways of invasive alien species and by failing to transmit it or them to the Commission without delay, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to establish and implement one single action plan or a set of action plans to address the priority pathways of invasive alien species and by failing to transmit it or them to the Commission without delay, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species; (1)

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In a single plea in law, the Commission claims that, by failing to establish and implement one single action plan or a set of action plans to address the priority pathways of invasive alien species and by failing to transmit it or them to the Commission without delay, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species.

In particular, on the date of expiry of the time limit laid down in the reasoned opinion, namely 9 April 2022, the defendant had neither established nor implemented one single action plan or a set of action plans to address the priority pathways of invasive alien species pursuant to Article 13(2) of that regulation, nor had it transmitted without delay that plan or set of plans pursuant to Article 13(5) of the regulation.

---

(1)  OJ 2014 L 317, p. 35.

---
No. 85-1665.

#### Probe et al. *v.*California State Teachers’ Retirement System et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Barbara Glover MANGUM, Terry Overton, Deborah Overton and Van Eure v. RALEIGH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, PRS Partners, LLC, and RPS Holdings, LLC.

No. 613PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

James L. Gale, David L. York, Marc C. Tucker, Raleigh, for Mangum et al.

Robin Tatum Currin, Keith H. Johnson, Raleigh, for Bd. of Adjustment et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 652 S.E.2d 731.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of December 2007 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Plaintiffs shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or b y a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
STATE v. BROOKS.

No. COA07-940.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 20, 2008.

Certification Date June 9, 2008.

Appeal from Alamance (05CRS53425, 05CRS53426).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Janse Eliot COOKE.

No. 190P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Matthew Wunsche, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Cooke.

John Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 24th day of April 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following *224order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
STATE v. Clyde Edward SPENCER.

No. 137P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

E. Burke Haywood, Special Deputy Attorney General, Rick Shaffer, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st day of March 2008 by Defendant to allow Defendant to make a timely appeal according to the time the Defendant received the opinion from N.C. Court of Appeals:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
# Council Implementing Decision 2014/40/CFSP (repealed)Show full title

Council Implementing Decision 2014/40/CFSP of 28 January 2014 implementing Decision 2011/423/CFSP of 18 July 2011 concerning            restrictive measures against Sudan and South Sudan (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision 2014/40/CFSP                     

# of 28 January 2014

# implementing Decision 2011/423/CFSP of 18 July 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Sudan and South Sudan (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Council Decision 2014/450/CFSP of 10 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Sudan and repealing                                 Decision 2011/423/CFSP.
IN RE J.E.C.M.

No. COA07-1424.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Carteret (05J119, 05J120).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-3198-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Ohio (FEMA-3198-EM), dated January 11, 2005, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 25, 2005.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Ohio is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of January 11, 2005: 

The counties of Crawford, Huron, Marion, Richland, Sandusky, and Seneca for emergency protective measures (Category B) under the Public Assistance program for a period of 48 hours. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster Assistance.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05-1778 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P