alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1258/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1258/2014 of 24 November 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1258/2014                     

# of 24 November 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 November 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
ISAAC v. WELLS.

No. COA07-1039.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Buncombe (06CVD2918, 03J245).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part and remanded with instructions.
MASON v. COSTON.

COA06-14.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Duplin (04CVS307)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.**

**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Michael Maturo, President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of**

**Reckson Associates Realty Corp.,  the sole general partner of the Registrant**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

I, Michael Maturo, President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the sole general partner of Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|   | 1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: November 13, 2006 |   |     |
|--------------------------|--------|----------|
|                          |   | By  | /s/ Michael Maturo |
|                     |   |     |  

 

 

Michael          Maturo, 

President,          Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Reckson Associates          Realty Corp., the sole general partner of the Registrant

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
Exhibit 10.4


 


CERTAIN INFORMATION (INDICATED BY “[***]”) IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS
BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION.  CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS
BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.


 


TOSHIBA


 


Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.


2950 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, CA 95131


 


Design and Production Agreement


 


Amendment #1


 


Netlist Inc.


 


This
Design and Production Agreement Amendment effective May 22, 2009 (the “Effective
Date”) is between Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., with a
principal place of business at 19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 400, Irvine,
CA 92612 (“TAEC”) and Netlist Inc. with a place of business at 51 Discovery, Suite 150
Irvine, CA 92618 (“Customer”) and sets out the terms and conditions under which
TAEC will design the product identified herein for Customer.


 


1.                                      Project
Name


 


Register
ASIC


 


2.                                      Summary


 


This
Amendment #1 to the Register ASIC Design and Production Agreement, dated July 31,
2008, (TAEC#27N1242613) is hereby amended to remove the Major Project
Milestones in section 4. Schedule and replace with the following Major Project
Milestones as follows:


 


4.                                      Schedule


 


Major
Project Milestones


 


	
  Event

  	
   

  	
  Target Date/Completed

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  
	
  [***]

  	
   

  	
  [***]

  



 

















 


Except
as modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Design and Production
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect per their terms.


 


 


	
  Toshiba
  America Electronic Components, Inc.

  	
   

  	
  NetList
  Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Takeshi Iwamoto

  	
   

  	
  /s/
  James P. Perrott

  
	
  Signature

  	
   

  	
  Signature

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  James P. Perrott, SVP
  Sales & Marketing

  
	
  Takeshi Iwamoto VP,
  Customer SoC & Foundry Business Unit

  	
   

  	
  Printed Name and Title

  
	
  Printed Name and Title

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  5-22-09

  
	
  5-22-09

  	
   

  	
  Date

  
	
  Date
IN RE M.A.R.

No. COA07-991.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (93J455).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
**INTERMEC,      INC.**

**SUBSIDIARIES      OF THE REGISTRANT**

| **Name                of Subsidiary**                             |   |                          |   | **Jurisdiction                of****Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Intermec                Technologies Corporation                  |   | WASHINGTON                    |
| Intermec                Technologies de México, S.A. de C.V. |   | MEXICO                        |
| Infolink                Group Limited                             |   | AUSTRALIA                     |
| Intermec                Technologies Australia Pty. Limited       |   | AUSTRALIA                     |
| Intermec                International Inc.                        |   | WASHINGTON                    |
| Intermec                Technologies Holdings B.V.                |   | NETHERLANDS                   |
| Intermec                International B.V.                        |   | NETHERLANDS                   |
| Intermec                AB                                        |   | SWEDEN                        |
| Intermec                Printer AB                                |   | SWEDEN                        |
| Intermec                Technologies AB                           |   | SWEDEN                        |
| Intermec                Technologies A/S                          |   | DENMARK                       |
| ITC                Intermec Technologies Corporation AS           |   | NORWAY                        |
| Intermec                Technologies (S) Pte Ltd             |   | SINGAPORE                     |
| Intermec                Scanner Technology Center S.A.S           |   | FRANCE                        |
| Intermec                Technologies Manufacturing LLC            |   | WASHINGTON                    |
| Intermec                IP Corp.                                  |   | DELAWARE                      |
| Intermec                Label Products B.V.                       |   | NETHERLANDS                   |
| Intermec                (South America) Ltda.                     |   | BRAZIL                        |
| Intermec                Technologies Canada Ltd.                  |   | CANADA                        |
| Intermec                Technologies Benelux B.V.                 |   | NETHERLANDS                   |
| Intermec                Technologies GmbH                         |   | GERMANY                       |
| Intermec                Technologies S.r.l.                       |   | ITALY                         |
| Intermec                Technologies U.K. Limited                 |   | UNITED                KINGDOM |
| Intermec                Technologies S.A.S.                       |   | FRANCE                        |
| Intermec                Technologies, S.A.                        |   | SPAIN                         |
| Intermec                Europe Limited                            |   | UNITED                KINGDOM |
#### In the Matter of Karl Dean, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 92]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered March 21, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Earole denying his request for parole release.

Fetitioner is serving an aggregate prison sentence of 25 years *1208to life following his 1978 conviction of, among other things, murder in the first degree for the shooting death of a police officer. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an April 2004 determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release upon his second appearance. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.

We affirm. Parole release determinations are discretionary and will not be disturbed unless there is a “ ‘showing of irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]). Here, while the Board placed emphasis on the nature of the instant offense and petitioner’s involvement with weapons and drugs, the record establishes that it also considered all of the relevant statutory factors, including petitioner’s positive achievements while incarcerated *(see*Executive Law § 259-i [1] [a]; [2] [c]; [5]). Consequently, we find no basis upon which to disturb the Board’s determination denying petitioner’s request for parole release *(see Matter of Davis v New York State Bd. of Parole,*17 AD3d 970 [2005]; *Matter of Moore v Travis,*8 AD3d 717, 717-718 [2004]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that the Board’s decision was predetermined, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
# C_2023271EN.01003601.xml

| 31.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/36

---

Action brought on 19 June 2023 — Next Media Project v EFCA

(Case T-338/23)

(2023/C 271/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Next Media Project, SLU (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: R. Simar and L. Trefon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Fisheries Control Agency

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Fisheries Control Agency of 8 June 2023, by which it decided to reject Next Media Project’s offer; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Fisheries Control Agency of 8 June 2023, by which it decided to reject Next Media Project’s offer;

| — | order the European Fisheries Control Agency to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Fisheries Control Agency to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant alleges that the defendant failed to comply with points 12.2 and 29.3 of Annex 1 to Regulation 2018/1046, (1) with its tender specifications (Article 3.4.2. of the special specifications of tender EFCA/2022/OP/0004) and with its duties of diligence and meticulousness; it is further argued that the defendant committed a manifest error of assessment.

| — | The legal ground seeks to demonstrate that the opposite party was required to take into consideration the applicant’s offer, since that offer is not tainted by an irregularity, within the meaning of point 12.2 of Annex 1 to the said Regulation 2018/1046. |
| --- | --- |

—

The legal ground seeks to demonstrate that the opposite party was required to take into consideration the applicant’s offer, since that offer is not tainted by an irregularity, within the meaning of point 12.2 of Annex 1 to the said Regulation 2018/1046.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1).

---
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 786/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 786/2014 of 15 July 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for greater silver smelt in Union            and international waters of V, VI and VII by vessels flying the flag of Ireland         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 786/2014                     

# of 15 July 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for greater silver smelt in Union and international waters of V, VI and VII by vessels                        flying the flag of Ireland                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David J. Neithercut, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/DAVID J. NEITHERCUTDavid J. Neithercut
Chief Financial Officer of
Equity Residential, General Partner
November 13, 2002 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 57/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 57/2014 of 22 January 2014 approving non-minor amendments to the specification            for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Třeboňský kapr            (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 57/2014                     

# of 22 January 2014

# approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin                        and protected geographical indications [Třeboňský kapr (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined the Czech                              Republic's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Třeboňský                              kapr’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1407/2007(2).

(2)Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission                              published the amendment application in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments                              should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The amendments to the specification published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 January 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.7.****Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom**U.K.

#### THE CZECH REPUBLICU.K.

Třeboňský kapr (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 312, 30.11.2007, p. 16.                           

3

OJ C 179, 25.6.2013, p. 27.
1 District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation.

2 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-21049

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALTON DANE HUDNALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-97-CR-262-3)

 

May 14, 2001

Before POLITZ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and FALLON,1 District

Judge.

PER CURIAM:2

Having considered the briefs and pertinent parts of the

record, and the arguments of counsel, the district court did not

abuse its discretion regarding the submission of the evidence at

issue nor did it clearly err in enhancing the sentence for abuse of
a position of trust pursuant to § 3B1.3 of the Sentencing

Guidelines.

AFFIRMED