alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53030-53031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
September 5, 2005:
    A Closed Meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 7, 2005 at 10 
a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain

[[Page 53031]]

staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a) (3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Nazareth, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
September 7, 2005, will be:
    Formal orders of investigations;
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: August 31, 2005.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-17660 Filed 8-31-05; 4:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
# C_2023173EN.01003701.xml

| 15.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/37

---

Action brought on 24 March 2023 — Kneipp v EUIPO — Patou (Joyful by nature)

(Case T-157/23)

(2023/C 173/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Kneipp GmbH (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Pejman, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jean Patou (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Joyful by nature — Application for registration No 18 159 946

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 January 2023 in Case R 532/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the refusal of the application for goods and services in Classes 3, 4, 35 and 44; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the refusal of the application for goods and services in Classes 3, 4, 35 and 44;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the applicant`s fees and costs of the action as well as the applicant`s fees and costs of the opposition proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the applicant`s fees and costs of the action as well as the applicant`s fees and costs of the opposition proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Devozeo Demontra PERSON.

No. 2A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

K.D. Sturgis, Assistant Attorney General, Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 653 S.E.2d 560.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 3rd day of January 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
STATE of North Carolina v. Jerry Lee CALLAHAN, Jr.

No. 219P00-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Jerry Lee Callahan, Jr., Pro Se, for Callahan.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th day of November 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Robeson County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TIMOTHY PARHAM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 20-0468 (UNA)

)

CHARLES RETTIG. )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court is mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent 

standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 

U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the 

grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim 

showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader 

seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice 

to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to 

prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. 

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). It is apparent that plaintiff’s complaint 

accomplishes none of these goals.

Plaintiff alleges that the Internal Revenue Service has “used the transmitting utility 

TIMOTHY JAMES PARHAMTM and [his] copyrighted name Timothy Parham© without [his] 

permission and without compensating [him] monetarily as outlined in private TRUST documents 

7/13/2020
attached to [his] revocable living trust and UCC-1 financial statement[.]” Am. Compl. at 1. He 

purports to allow the Internal Revenue Service to “steal any amount as long as [it] agree[s] to 

repay one-thousand (1000) times the amounts that [it has] deducted from [plaintiff’s] wages 

retroactively.” Id. at 1-2. Missing from the complaint, as amended, is a statement of a 

cognizable claim or a basis for the Court’s jurisdiction. Because the complaint fails to comply 

with Rule 8(a), the Court will dismiss it without prejudice.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE: July 13, 2020 /s/

JAMES E. BOASBERG

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,325,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,750,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,338,000
<PP&E>                                     346,114,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              47,012,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             382,251,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,714,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       260,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,026,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               382,251,000
<SALES>                                    103,753,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           103,753,000
<CGS>                                       10,938,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,938,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           120,044,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            29,298,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,939,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (97,471,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   539,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (98,010,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (6,439,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (104,449,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (4.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.01)



</TABLE>
Exhibit



Exhibit 10-1





DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
(effective as of January 1, 2016)


The following is a summary of the material terms of the compensation arrangement for members of the Board of Directors of The Goldfield Corporation (the “Company”).


Directors who are also employees of the Company are not paid any fees or other remuneration for service on the Board of Directors or on any Board of Directors’ committee.


Each non-employee director is paid an annual cash retainer of $36,000.  Each of the chairmen of the Audit Committee and of the Benefits and Compensation Committee also receives annual cash retainers of $15,000.  Both the director and chairmen retainers are payable in monthly installments.


Each non-employee director also receives $1,000 for each Board of Directors meeting attended in person and $500 for attendance at a Board of Directors meeting by telephone.  In addition, each non-employee director who is a committee member receives $500 for attendance at a committee meeting in person and $250 for attendance at a committee meeting by telephone, except for the Executive Committee for which there is no compensation.


Directors also are reimbursed for travel and other out-of-pocket costs associated with their attendance at Board of Directors and committee meetings.
STATE v. SMITH.

No. COA08-191.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Johnston (06CRS8035, 06CRS8042).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
LAPIDUS v. SIEMENS POWER TRANSMISSION.

No. COA07-784.

No. COA07-836.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 20, 2008.

Certification Date June 9, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 162240, I.C. NO. 836986).

Cases reported without published opinion. Remanded; Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53134-53135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17648]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE

29 CFR Part 1404


Proposed Changes to Arbitration Policies, Functions, and 
Procedures

AGENCY: Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.

ACTION: Proposed rule: extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document extends the comment period for the proposed rule 
published on July 7, 2005 at 70 FR page 39209.
    The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) is proposing 
to revise 29 CFR part 1404, Arbitration Services. The revisions are 
intended to set forth the criteria and procedures for listing on the 
arbitration roster, removal from the arbitration roster, and expedited 
arbitration processing. Other changes include how parties may request 
arbitration lists or panels and fees associated with the arbitrators. 
The purpose of these changes is to facilitate the management and 
administration of the arbitration roster.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
address section below on or before December 6, 2005.

[[Page 53135]]


ADDRESSES: Submit comments to the Maria A. Fried, General Counsel, 
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, 2100 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20427. Comments may be submitted also by fax at (202) 
606-5345 or electronic mail (e-mail) to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83eee5f1eae6e7c3e5eee0f0ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="274a41554e424367414a445409404851">[email protected]</span></a>. All comments 
and data in electronic form must be identified by the appropriate 
agency form number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria A. Fried, General Counsel and 
Federal Register Liaison, FMCS, 2100 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20427. Telephone (202) 606-5444; Fax (202) 606-5345.

    Dated: August 31, 2005.
Maria A. Fried,
General Counsel and Federal Register Contact.
[FR Doc. 05-17648 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6732-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           4,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,324
<INVENTORY>                                     38,469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,372
<PP&E>                                          44,169
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,519
<BONDS>                                         22,474
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,368
<SALES>                                         34,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,309
<CGS>                                           22,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,460
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,102
<INCOME-TAX>                                       432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                670
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3576 

To prohibit the issuance of any lease or other authorization by the Federal 

Government that authorizes exploration, development, or production of 

oil or natural gas in any marine national monument or national marine 

sanctuary or in the fishing grounds known as Georges Bank in the 

waters of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the issuance of any lease or other authorization 

by the Federal Government that authorizes exploration, 

development, or production of oil or natural gas in any 

marine national monument or national marine sanctuary 

or in the fishing grounds known as Georges Bank in 

the waters of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Georges Bank Preser5 vation Act’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 3576 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LEASING IN CERTAIN FEDERAL 

2 PROTECTED AREAS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of Federal law, no lease or other authorization may 

5 be issued by the Federal Government that authorizes ex6 ploration, development, or production of oil or natural gas 

7 in— 

8 (1) any marine national monument or national 

9 marine sanctuary; or 

10 (2) the fishing grounds known as Georges Bank 

11 in the waters of the United States, which is 1 of the 

12 largest and most historically important fishing 

13 grounds of the United States. 

14 (b) IDENTIFICATION OF COORDINATES OF GEORGES

15 BANK.—The Secretary of Commerce, after publication of 

16 public notice and an opportunity for public comment, shall 

17 identify the specific coordinates that delineate Georges 

18 Bank in the waters of the United States for purposes of 

19 subsection (a). 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   Exhibit 10.15



                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                              --------------------


This Amendment to Employment Agreement is made as of this 30th day of April, 
1998 by and between Ronald L. Koonsman, a Texas resident ("Employee"), and 
Telephone Warehouse, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Employer").

                                   WITNESSETH
                                   ----------

WHEREAS, Employee and Employer entered into that certain Amended and Restated 
Employment Agreement dated as of the 27th day of June, 1997 (the "Employment 
Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, Employee and Employer have agreed to a certain amendment to the 
Employment Agreement to provide for the continued employment of Employee by 
Employer.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein
contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Employee and Employer agree to
amend the Employment Agreement as follows:

         1. Paragraph 3(b) shall be restated in its entirety to read as 
follows: On or prior to January 31, 1999, he shall receive a bonus in the amount
of $652,000.

         2. Except as herein amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in 
full force and effect.

WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and
year first above written.

                                    EMPLOYER:

                                    TELEPHONE WAREHOUSE, INC.

                                    By: /s/ Nick Molina
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Name:  Nick Molina
                                       Title: CEO/President

                                    EMPLOYEE:

                                       /s/ Ronald L. Koonsman
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Ronald L. Koonsman
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

     I, John W. Stanton, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A
         of Western Wireless Corporation.

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
         statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
         to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
         such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
         covered by this quarterly report.

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this report, fairly present in all material
         respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
         of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

                                        By: /s/ JOHN W. STANTON
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John W. Stanton
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: September 11, 2003
STATE v. BRYSON.

No. COA07-1230.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Buncombe (06CRS11300, 06CRS11301).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
STATE v. SHAW.

No. COA08-97.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (06CRS046098).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.