alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,999,284
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       6,963,130
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,636,603
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         4,703,356
<LOANS>                                     81,359,296
<ALLOWANCE>                                    751,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,588,655
<DEPOSITS>                                  63,424,713
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            995,035
<LONG-TERM>                                 13,390,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,225
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,265,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             100,588,655
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,348,304
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              332,951
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               351,549
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,032,804
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,393,811
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,265,860
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,766,944
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  219,360
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,624,609
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,080,751
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     652,543
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   652,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.48
<LOANS-NON>                                    392,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               604,405
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   91,711
<RECOVERIES>                                    18,529
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              751,123
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           751,123
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 4 

To make the United States more secure by implementing unfinished recommendations of the 9/11 Commission to fight the war on terror more 

effectively, to improve homeland security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. 

SCHUMER, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. 

WEBB, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. LANDRIEU, and Mrs. BOXER) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To make the United States more secure by implementing 

unfinished recommendations of the 9/11 Commission to 

fight the war on terror more effectively, to improve 

homeland security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving America’s 

5 Security by Implementing Unfinished Recommendations 

6 of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007’’. 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 4 IS

1 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

2 It is the sense of Congress that Congress should 

3 enact, and the President should sign, legislation to make 

4 the United States more secure by implementing unfinished 

5 recommendations of the 9/11 Commission to fight the war 

6 on terror more effectively and to improve homeland secu7 rity. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: 

National Science Board; Programs and Plans Committee. 

# DATE AND TIME:

September 13, 2005, 11:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. (e.t.). 

# PLACE:

National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Public Meeting Room 110. 

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

## Tuesday, September 13, 2005, Open Session. 

### Open Session (11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.) 

      - Review of NSF Draft Cyberinfrastructure Document.
      - Open Discussion and Comments.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Michael P. Crosby, Executive Officer and NSB Office Director, (703) 292-7000,                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb*.                     

Michael P. Crosby, 

Executive Officer and NSB Office Director. 

[FR Doc. 05-17951 Filed 9-6-05; 3:46 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Clickable  Enterprises,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: July 14, 2005                    By: /s/ Nicholas Cirillo, Jr.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Nicholas Cirillo, Jr.,
                                           Title: President and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer (Principal Executive
                                                  Officer)

            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other  document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section  906,  has been  provided  to  Clickable
Enterprises,  Inc.  and will be  retained by  Clickable  Enterprises,  Inc.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# The Common Agricultural Policy Single Payment and Support Schemes (Cross Compliance) (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2014            (revoked)         

        - Previous
        - Next

E+W

Welsh Statutory Instruments

# 2014 No. 371 (W. 39)

Agriculture, Wales

# The Common Agricultural Policy Single Payment and Support Schemes (Cross Compliance) (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2014                        (revoked)F1

Made

18 February 2014

Laid before the National Assembly for Wales

20 February 2014

Coming into force

21 February 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.1.2015) by The Common Agricultural Policy (Integrated Administration and Control System and Enforcement and Cross Compliance) (Wales)                                 Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/3223), **Sch. 3**
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 142/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 142/2014 of 13 February 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 142/2014                     

# of 13 February 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 February 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 550 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 550

 To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District 
                              of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2007

 Mr. Akaka (for himself, Mr. Voinovich, and Mr. Lieberman) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
             on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District 
                              of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPOSITION OF SUPERIOR COURT.

    Section 903 of title 11 of the District of Columbia Code is amended 
by striking ``fifty-eight'' and inserting ``61''.
                                 <all>
```
----

(2004/C 33 E/108)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1359/03

by Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(10 April 2003)

Subject:   Gran Sol fleet provisional rest period

The Galician fleet fishing in the Gran Sol grounds has planned a biological rest period from 1 July onwards. In order that this biological rest period can go ahead with all the necessary guarantees in place for the fleet involved, the relevant authorisation must be published in good time in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ).

Can the Commission give details of the steps it intends to take or has already taken to ensure that the fleet involved can carry out this biological rest period and the relevant authorisation can be published in the OJ in good time?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(26 May 2003)

The Commission can inform the Honourable Member that it received a communication from the Spanish authorities on this matter on 20 March 2003.

The proposed measure, including the reasons behind its adoption, must be assessed, in particular from a biological point of view.

The Commission is currently examining whether the initiative is compatible with the relevant provisions of the Community legislation applicable in this area (1) (Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2369/2002).

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2369/2002 of 20 December 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector, OJ L 358, 31.12.2002.

----
STATE v. Richard Pliney PURSER.

No. 221P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 4, 2008.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, Lori Hamilton-DeWitt, Mocksville, for Purser.

John Snyder, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of June 2008 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of June 2008."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 510 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 510

To specify that the 100 most populous urban areas of the United States, 
as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall be eligible 
 for grants under the Urban Area Security Initiative of the Department 
             of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2007

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To specify that the 100 most populous urban areas of the United States, 
as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall be eligible 
 for grants under the Urban Area Security Initiative of the Department 
             of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Urban Area Security Initiative 
Improvement Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act--
            (1) the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of Homeland 
        Security; and
            (2) the term ``Urban Area Security Initiative'' means the 
        Urban Area Security Initiative grant program administered by 
        the Department of Homeland Security from funds appropriated for 
        discretionary grants to high-threat, high-density urban areas.

SEC. 3. GRANTS UNDER URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE.

    (a) Eligibility.--
            (1) In general.--Each of the 100 most populous urban areas 
        of the United States shall be eligible for a grant under the 
        Urban Area Security Initiative.
            (2) Determination.--For purposes of this subsection, the 
        Secretary shall determine the urban areas referred to in 
        paragraph (1) in accordance with the data collected in the most 
        recent census of the United States.
    (b) Sensitivity Analysis.--The Secretary shall award grants under 
the Urban Area Security Initiative after conducting a study of how the 
variation in the output of models (numerical or otherwise) used for 
such awards can be apportioned, qualitatively or quantitatively, to 
different sources of variation (commonly referred to as sensitivity 
analysis).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11(b)




                               ELECTROSCOPE, INC.



                COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

                            AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                For the Six Months Ended
                                                             -----------------------------
                                                             September 30,    September 30,
                                                                 1996             1995
                                                             ------------     ------------
<S>                                                           <C>              <C>
NET INCOME (LOSS)                                             $  (717,280)     $  (579,556)
                                                              -----------      -----------
                                                              -----------      -----------

SHARES USED IN SHARE COMPUTATION-
  Common stock shares outstanding (weighted average)            4,724,850        3,662,658


  Treasury stock effect of common stock and
    equivalents issued within one year of the public
    offering at prices less than the public offering price         28,185           82,994
                                                              -----------      -----------
        Shares used in computation                              4,753,035        3,745,652
                                                              -----------      -----------
                                                              -----------      -----------

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE AND
  COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE                                          $(0.15)          $(0.15)
                                                              -----------      -----------
                                                              -----------      -----------

</TABLE>


                                       21
IN RE J.T.W.

No. COA08-383.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 2, 2008.

Certification Date December 22, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (07J438).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 942/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 942/2014 of 3 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 942/2014                     

# of 3 September 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 September 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.