alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report of VASCO Data Security International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Clifford K.
Bown, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Clifford K. Bown   
|Clifford K. Bown       
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|March 14, 2008
STATE of North Carolina v. James Allen TURNAGE, Jr.

No. 228A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 20, 2008.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Emily H. Davis, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Turnage.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 20th day of May 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th day of May 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WESTERN
WIRELESS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          34,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,689
<INVENTORY>                                     27,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,844
<PP&E>                                         992,832
<DEPRECIATION>                                 286,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,755,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,226
<BONDS>                                      1,315,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       801,392
<OTHER-SE>                                   (599,015)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,755,044
<SALES>                                         22,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,425
<CGS>                                           46,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  319,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,235
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (117,190)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (117,190)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (117,190)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.55)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.55)
<FN>
<F1>
FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Keith Edward HARRINGTON.

No. 277P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Glenn Gerding, Southport, for Harrington.

Charles E. Reece, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 10th day of June 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of June 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following *345order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Morgan Stanley Tangible Asset Fund L.P. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      23,430,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,192<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,048,758<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,048,757<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,045,724<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,669,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,375,789
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,375,789
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,375,789
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $76,192.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized loss on open contracts of $100,830.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $269,545, accrued
brokerage fees of $70,827, accrued management fees of $48,511 and
service fees payable of $19,404.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $3,003,270,
net change in unrealized of $1,178,071 and interest income of $864,383.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 174 (Friday, September 9, 2005)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 53721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18038]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 174 / Friday, September 9, 2005 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 53721]]


                Proclamation 7923 of September 4, 2005

                
Honoring the Memory of the Victims of Hurricane 
                Katrina

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                As a mark of respect for the victims of Hurricane 
                Katrina, I hereby order, by the authority vested in me 
                by the Constitution and laws of the United States of 
                America, that the flag of the United States shall be 
                flown at half-staff at the White House and on all 
                public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and 
                naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal 
                Government in the District of Columbia and throughout 
                the United States and its Territories and possessions 
                until sunset, Tuesday, September 20, 2005. I also 
                direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for 
                the same period at all United States embassies, 
                legations, consular offices, and other facilities 
                abroad, including all military facilities and naval 
                vessels and stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                fourth day of September, in the year of our Lord two 
                thousand five, and of the Independence of the United 
                States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

[FR Doc. 05-18038
Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Tracey Lamour SILER.

No. 117P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Glenn Gerding, Southport, for Siler.

Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of March 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
Jeffrey Bernard LINEBERGER v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, a North Carolina State Agency, and The North Carolina Post-Release Supervision and Parole Commission, a North Carolina State Agency.

No. 141A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, for Dept. of Corrections, et al.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for Lineberger.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 657 S.E.2d 673.

*309*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd day of April 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 8th day of April 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Accordingly, the new brief of the Defendant shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
Exhibit 10.11


 


SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM


 


1.               Each
non-employee director (“Non-Employee Director”) of General Growth Properties,
Inc. (the “Company”) shall be paid an annual cash retainer of $60,000.


 


2.               The chairperson
of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating &
Governance Committee shall be paid an annual cash retainer of $25,000, $15,000
and $10,000, respectively.


 


3.     Each
Non-Employee Director shall be paid $1,500 for each Board meeting attended in person;
$1,000 for each Board meeting attended telephonically; $1,500 for each Audit
Committee meeting attended; $1,500 for each committee meeting attended in
person; and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended telephonically.


 


4.     In
addition to receiving fees for their services as directors, each Non-Employee
Director shall receive an annual equity award of restricted stock valued at
$90,000 (“Annual Award”) and a new director equity award of restricted stock
valued at $75,000 (“New Director Award”) under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
Each Annual Award shall vest on the first anniversary of such award.  Each New Director Award shall vest one third
on grant date and one third on each of the first and second anniversaries of
the grant date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,484
<SECURITIES>                                    58,511
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                       422
<INVENTORY>                                      3,216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,943
<PP&E>                                          15,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,435
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,395
<SALES>                                         70,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,149
<CGS>                                           21,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  34
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,099
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,837
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,837
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35


</TABLE>
STATE v. James Phillip MEGGS.

No. 721P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael Parker, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th day of December 2005 by Defendant for Petition for Plain Error Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of January 2006."
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION




By signing below, each of the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her capacity as an officer of LSB Financial Corp. (the “Registrant”) that (i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period.









Date:  November 15, 2010

/s/
Randolph F. WilliamsRandolph F. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  November 15, 2010

/s/
Mary Jo DavidMary Jo DavidVice President and Chief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to LSB Financial Corp. and will be retained by LSB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2023216EN.01005301.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/53

---

Action brought on 24 April 2023 — EFFAS v EUIPO — CFA Institute (CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst)

(Case T-213/23)

(2023/C 216/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: European Federation of Financial Analysts’Societies (EFFAS) (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: CFA Institute (Charlottesville, Virginia, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst — Application for registration No 14 902 341

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 February 2023 in Case R 1418/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the possible intervener to pay for all expenses of this procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the possible intervener to pay for all expenses of this procedure.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
STATE v. SHEARER.

No. COA07-1384.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Wayne (06CRS54032).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53041-53042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax 
Credit Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Amended notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income 
Tax Credit Issue Committee will be conducted (via teleconference). The 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service.

DATES: The meeting has been changed to Thursday, September 22, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 
(toll-free), or 718-488-2085 (non toll-free).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax 
Credit Issue Committee that was published in the Federal Register 
August 22, 2005, has been rescheduled for Thursday, September 22, 2005 
from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. e.t. via a telephone conference call. The 
public is invited to make oral comments. Individual comments will be 
limited to 5 minutes. For information or to confirm attendance, 
notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Audrey 
Y. Jenkins. Ms. Jenkins may be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 488-
2085, send written comments to Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP Office, 10 
MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or post 
comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the 
telephone conference call meeting must be made in advance.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.


[[Page 53042]]


    Dated: August 30, 2005.
Martha Curry,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 05-17561 Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
_____________

No. 96-2295NE

_____________

Rosee Torres; Elisa R. Torres, *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

School District No. 2 of * of Nebraska.

Madison County, Nebraska, *

commonly known as the Norfolk * [UNPUBLISHED]

School District, a political *

subdivision of the State of *

Nebraska; Daniel D. Jewell, *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

Submitted: February 10, 1997

 Filed: February 21, 1997

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Rosee Torres and Elisa R. Torres appeal the district court's adverse

grant of summary judgment in their lawsuit over competing claims to real

estate in Madison County, Nebraska. We review a grant of summary judgment

under a well-established standard. We also review de novo questions of

state law. Having considered the record and the parties' briefs, we are

satisfied the district court correctly applied Nebraska law and the record

supports the district court's ruling. We also conclude that a

comprehensive opinion would lack precedential value. We thus affirm the

district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.