alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.1

RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L. P.

Certification of Scott H. Rechler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the Sole General Partner of the
Registrant,
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Scott H. Rechler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the sole general partner of Reckson Operating Partnership, L.
P. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                  
|  

|                              |    |                                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------- | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                              |    |                                                                                                                                                                                        
|Dated:
      November 7, 2005 | By | / s / Scott H. Rechler                                                                                                                                                                 
|                              |    |                                                                                                                                                                                        
|                              |    | Scott H. Rechler,
Chairman of the Board,
    Chief
Executive Officer,
    President and Director of
Reckson Associates
    Realty Corp., the sole
general
    partner of the Registrant

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               298,820
<PP&E>                                      11,082,282
<DEPRECIATION>                                 814,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,701,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          362,543
<BONDS>                                      4,567,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,410,414
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,701,961
<SALES>                                        410,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               416,237
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,264
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             79,264
<DISCONTINUED>                                  21,416
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. NASH.

No. COA08-343.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 4, 2008.

Certification Date November 24, 2008.

Appeal from Cumberland (05CRS68342).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STANFIELD v. METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER/BALL CORP.

No. COA08-513.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 6, 2009.

Certification Date January 26, 2009.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 600557).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Garry Lewis STALE Y.

No. 122P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Garry Lewis Staley, Pro Se.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th day of March 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals and/or any other available relief pursuant to the All Writs Act, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 17, 2014

NO. 03-12-00442-CR

Eugene Hill, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Western Wireless Corporation, a Washington corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

          The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March
          31, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 15, 2004

                                                   By: /s/ JOHN W. STANTON
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       John W. Stanton
                                                       Chairman of the Board and
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
STATE v. Clarence GILLIS.

No. 320P03-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Charles E. Reece, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The, following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of September 2007 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of December 2007."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Saul Nixon, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 581]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), rendered November 7, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19-21 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s identity and guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see People v McFadden,*18 AD3d 782 [2005]).

Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 494-495 [1987]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Torres,*282 AD2d 481 [2001]; *People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We also reject the defendant’s assertion that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. “To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, it is incumbent on defendant to demonstrate the absence of strategic or other legitimate *1124explanations for counsel’s” alleged failures in representation *(People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]). The defendant failed to do so. Adams, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.
STATE v. JOHNSTON.

No. COA08-173.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 7, 2008.

Certification Date October 27, 2008.

Appeal from Wilson (06CRS53209).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                      RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

           CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL MATURO, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT,
    TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.,
        THE SOLE GENERAL PARTNER OF RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.,
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the sole general partner of Reckson
Operating Partnership, L.P. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  May 7, 2004


              RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
                   By: Reckson Associates Realty Corp., its sole general partner


                                    By /s/ Michael Maturo
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President,
                                       Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. STOKES.

No. COA07-110.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (04CRS115562).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
ANDREWS v. HAYGOOD.

No. 57A07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 16, 2008.

Pamela S. Duffy, Molly A. Orndorff, Burlington, for Charlie Brown, Trustee.

Susannah Holloway, for NCDHHS.

Timothy P. Lehan, Raleigh, Robert M. Clay, for Haygood, et al.

Brent Stephens, Durham, for Andrews, et al.

Burton Craige, Raleigh, for NCATL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of May 2008 by NCATL for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of May 2008."
```

                                                                EXHIBIT 13.(A).1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tefron Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
20-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certify that to the best of our knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 7, 2011

                                                   By: /s/ Amit Meridor
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Amit Meridor
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 7, 2011

                                                   By: /s/ Eran Rotem
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Eran Rotem
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 597 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.597

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
 United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 
                         breast cancer research.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2007'' and inserting ``2011''.

SEC. 2. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

    The National Institutes of Health and the Department of Defense 
shall each submit to Congress and the Government Accountability Office 
an annual report concerning the use of any amounts that it received 
under section 414(c) of title 39, United States Code, including a 
description of any significant advances or accomplishments, during the 
year covered by the report, that were funded, in whole or in part, with 
such amounts.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J.Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer of Equity Residential, general partner ofERPOP, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.

 
| /s/                     | David J. Neithercut |   |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------|--------|--------|
| David J. Neithercut     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| of Equity Residential   |
| August 7, 2006          |

 

----
# CE2004078EN.01068801.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/688 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/688

---

(2004/C 78 E/0734)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1287/02

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(7 May 2002)

Subject:   The planting of oilseed rape

Subject:

Is the Commission aware of any research into the effects on human health of oilseed rape cultivation — especially where it is grown in proximity to habitation?

Are there any plans to control the planting of this crop within close proximity of human habitation?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(28 June 2002)

(28 June 2002)

Similar written questions were put in 1991, 1992 and again in 1996 (E-1452/91 by Mr McCubbin (1), E-2414/91 by Mrs Ewing (2), E-2415/91 by Mrs Ewing (3), E-611/92 by Mr Raffin (4), E-2146/96 by Mrs McNally (5)). The Commission is not aware of a consensus within the scientific community on the matter raised in the Honourable Member's question. The Commission knows that there is some concern about the possible links between allergic symptoms in humans and the crop of oilseed rape and can confirm that several studies have been carried out on this subject (6), in particular by the Scottish Crops Research Institute and the University of Dundee (7). Given the result of the published papers, no conclusive evidence is available to demonstrate a direct cause effect on human health from oilseed rape cultivation.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 2.12.1991.

1

(2)  OJ C 159, 25.6.1992.

2

(3)  OJ C 209, 15.8.1992.

3

(4)  OJ C 32, 2.2.1994.

4

(5)  OJ C 11, 13.1.1997.

5

(6)  Butcher RD, Goodman BA, Deighton N, Smith WH. Evaluation of the allergic/irritant potential of air pollutants: detection of proteins modified by volatile organic compounds from oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. Oleifera) using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Cli Exp Allergy Oct 1995; 25(10): 985-92. Hemmer W, Focke M, Wantke F, Jager S, Gotz M, Jarisch R. Oilseed rape pollen is a potential relevant allergen. Cli Exp Allergy. Feb 1997; 27(2): 156-161Hemmer W. The health effects of oilseed rape: myth or reality? BMJ. 1998; 316: 1327-28 Soutar A, Harker C, Seaton A, Brooke M, Marr I. Oilseed rape and seasonal symptoms: epidemiological and environmental studies. Thorax, 1994; Vol 49: 352-56. Soutar A, Harker C, Seaton A, Packe G. Oilseed rape and bronchial reactivity. Occup Environ Med. Sep 1995; 52 575-580 Welch J, Jones MG, Cullinam P, Coates OA, Newman Taylor AJ. Sensitization to oilseed rape is not due to cross-reactivity with grass pollen Cli Exp Allergy. Mar 2000; 30(3): 370-375.

6

(7)  McEvan M, Macfarlane Smith WH. Identification of volatile organic compounds emitted in the field by oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. Oleifera) over the growing season. Cli Exp Allergy. 1998; 28: 332-38 Parratt D, Macfarlane Smith WH, Thomson G, Cameron LA, Butcher RD. Evidence that oilseed rape (Brassica napus spp. Oleifera) causes respiratory illness in rural dwellers; Sco Med J. 1995; 40: 074-76.

7

---
```

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

      As of both December 31, 2005,  and the date of filing this Form 10-KSB the
Company had the following subsidiaries:

      o     Enclaves of Live Oak LLC, a Texas limited liability company

      o     Enclaves of Eagle Nest LLC, a Florida limited liability company

      o     Enclaves of Spring Magnolia LLC, a Texas limited liability company

      o     Enclaves  of  Spring  Magnolia  II LLC,  a Texas  limited  liability
            company

      o     Enclaves  of Grand  Oaks LLC,  a South  Carolina  limited  liability
            company

      Each of the  above  subsidiaries  as of  those  dates  was a  wholly-owned
subsidiary  of  Enclaves  Group,  Inc.,  with the  Company as sole and  managing
member.
```
STATE v. JENKINS.

No. COA07-1006.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Transylvania (06CRS1669, 06CRS1670, 06CRS1671, 06CRS1673, 06CRS1674, 06CRS1675).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3735 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the eligibility 

of computer technology and equipment development businesses for enterprise zone incentives. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11 (legislative day, DECEMBER 10), 2008 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for the eligibility of computer technology and equipment 

development businesses for enterprise zone incentives. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND 

4 EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT BUSINESSES 

5 FOR ENTERPRISE ZONE INCENTIVES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1397C(d)(4) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to treatment of busi8 ness holding intangibles) is amended by inserting ‘‘other 

9 than the development of any computer technology or 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 3735 IS

1 equipment (as defined in section 170(e)(6)(F)(i))’’ after 

2 ‘‘license’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS