51404 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices 

Denial, 4/20/2005, Exemption No. 

8541. 

Docket No.: FAA–2002–12993. 

Petitioner: Stallion 51 Corporation 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.315. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Stallion 51 

Corporation, to provide initial and 

recurrent training and training under 

contract with the U.S. military in its two 

North American TF–51 airplanes 

certified as limited category civil 

aircraft. 

Grant, 8/01/2005, Exemption No. 

8593. 

[FR Doc. 05–17215 Filed 8–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Summary Notice No. PE–2005–50] 

Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions 

of Petitions Issued 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of disposition of prior 

petition. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking 

provisions governing the application, 

processing, and disposition of petitions 

for exemption, part 11 of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this 

notice contains the disposition of 

certain petitions previously received. 

The purpose of this notice is to improve 

the public’s awareness of, and 

participation in, this aspect of FAA’s 

regulatory activities. Neither publication 

of this notice nor the inclusion or 

omission of information in the summary 

is intended to affect the legal status of 

any petition or its final disposition. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim 

Adams (202) 267–8033, Sandy 

Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267–7271, or 

John Linsenmeyer (202) 267–5174, 

Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal 

Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 24, 

2005. 

Anthony F. Fazio, 

Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

Disposition of Petitions 

Docket No.: FAA–2004–19423. 

Petitioner: Fresh Air, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

125.224. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit the Fresh Air, 

Inc., to operate a piston-powered largeaircraft, weighing more than 33,000 

pounds maximum gross takeoff weight, 

without having a collision avoidance 

system installed in the aircraft. 

Denial, 05/02/2005, Exemption No. 

8550. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–20651. 

Petitioner: Aero Union Corporation. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.611. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Aero Union 

Corporation to ferry its eight Lockheed 

P–3 A/B (P–3) aircraft with one engine 

inoperative to a maintenance facility for 

the purpose of repairs. 

Grant, 05/02/2005, Exemption No. 

8551. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–15446. 

Petitioner: JetBlue Airways 

Corporation. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.434(c)(1)(ii). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit JetBlue Airways 

Corporation to substitute a qualified and 

authorized check airman or aircrew 

program designee for a Federal Aviation 

Administration inspector to observe a 

qualifying pilot in command who is 

completing a takeoff and a landing. 

Grant, 05/04/2005, Exemption No. 

8099A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9791. 

Petitioner: NockAir Helicopter, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

133.43(a) and (b). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit NockAir 

Helicopter, Inc., to use its helicopters to 

perform aerial trapeze acts without 

using an approved external-load 

attachment or quick-release device for 

carrying a person on a trapeze bar. 

Denial, 05/05/2005, Exemption No. 

6685D. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–16196. 

Petitioner: Alaska Air Carriers 

Association. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

43.3(g), 121.709(b)(3), and 135.443(b)(3). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Alaska Air 

Carriers Association (AACA) and its 

certificated and appropriately trained 

pilots employed by an AACA-member 

airline to remove and reinstall passenger 

seats in aircraft type certificate for 10 to 

19 passengers. The applicable aircraft 

are those operated by an AACA-member 

airline operation conducted under 14 

CFR part 121 or 14 CFR part 135. The 

exemption also permits those pilots to 

make required logbook entries. 

Grant, 05/05/2005, Exemption No. 

8176A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–15744. 

Petitioner: Arctic Air Service. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

133.45(e)(1). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Arctic Air 

Service to conduct Class D rotorcraftload combination operations with an 

Agusta A 109E helicopter certificated in 

the normal category under 14 CFR part 

27. 

Grant, 5/05/2005, Exemption No. 

8116A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–20887. 

Petitioner: Air Evac EMS, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Air Evac EMS, 

Inc., to operate certain aircraft under 

part 135 with a TSO–C112 (Mode S) 

transponder installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 5/05/2005, Exemption No. 

8552. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21035. 

Petitioner: Pelican Air, LLC. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Pelican Air, LLC, 

to operate certain aircraft under part 135 

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S) 

transponder installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 45/05/2005, Exemption No. 

8553. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8861. 

Petitioner: MCI Worldcom 

Management Co., Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

96.611. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit MCI Worldcom 

Management Co., Inc., to conduct ferry 

flights with one engine inoperative in 

MCI’s Falcon Trijet airplane, Model No. 

900, without obtaining special flight 

permit for each flight. 

Grant, 5/05/2005, Exemption No. 

5332G. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–15970. 

Petitioner: Montana Aircraft, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Montana 

Aircraft, Inc., to operate certain aircraft 

under part 135 without a TSO–C112 

(Mode S) transponder installed in the 

aircraft. 

Grant, 5/10/2005, Exemption No. 

8120E. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–20760. 

Petitioner: Sky Unlimited. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.223(b). 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices 51405 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Sky Unlimited, 

to operate its Beech 1900 aircraft after 

March 29, 2005, without being equipped 

with an approved terrain awareness and 

warning system that meets the 

requirements for Class B equipment I 

Technical Standard Order (TSO)–C151. 

Denial, 5/12/2005, Exemption No. 

8556. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21106. 

Petitioner: Mr. James G. Brendel. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.109(a). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Mr. James G. 

Brendel, to conduct certain flight 

training in Beechcraft Bonanza/ 

Debonair type aircraft that are equipped 

with a functioning throw-over control 

wheel. 

Grant, 5/12/2005, Exemption No. 

8557. 

Docket No.: FAA–2002–13311. 

Petitioner: The Boeing Company. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

21.325(b)(3). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Boeing’s 

Organizational Designated 

Airworthiness Representatives to issue 

export airworthiness approvals for Class 

II and Class III products manufactured 

by Boeing-approved suppliers in 19 

foreign countries and Taiwan. 

Grant, 5/12/2005, Exemption No. 

6860E. 

Docket No.: FAA–2002–11840. 

Petitioner: Davis Aerospace High 

School. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.251, 135.255, and 135.353, and 

appendices I and J. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Davis Aerospace 

High School and Black Pilots 

Association, to conduct local 

sightseeing flights at the Detroit City 

Airport, Detroit, Michigan, on or about 

May 15, 2005, for compensation or hire, 

without complying with certain antidrug and alcohol misuse prevention 

requirements of part 135. 

Grant, 5/12/2005, Exemption No. 

8554. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9097. 

Petitioner: Federal Express 

Corporation. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Federal Express 

Corporation, to operate certain aircraft 

under part 135 without a TSO–C112 

(Mode S) transponder installed in the 

aircraft. 

Grant, 5/16/2005, Exemption No. 

5711H. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–20935. 

Petitioner: Pomona Valley Pilots 

Association. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.251, 135.255, and 135.353, and 

appendices I and J. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Pomona Valley 

Pilots Association, to conduct local 

sightseeing flights for the Pomona 

Valley Air Fair at the Cable Airport, 

Upland, California, on July 9 and 10, 

2005, for compensation or hire to raise 

money for scholarship funds for local 

colleges, without complying with 

certain anti-drug and alcohol misuse 

prevention requirements of part 135. 

Grant, 5/16/2005, Exemption No. 

8555. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9282. 

Petitioner: Air Transport Association 

of America, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

63.39(b)(1) and (2) and 121.425(a)(2)(i) 

and (ii). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Air Transport 

Association of America, Inc., member 

airlines and other qualifying part 

121certificate holders conducting part 

121-approved flight engineer training 

programs to meet the certification 

requirements of § 121.425(a)(2)(i) and 

(ii) in a single flight check. The 

exemption also allows applicants in 

training for the flight check to take (1) 

the airplane preflight inspection portion 

of that flight check using an advanced 

pictorial means instead of an airplane, 

and (2) the normal procedure portion of 

that flight check in an approved flight 

simulation device. Furthermore, the 

exemption allows qualifying persons 

conducting part 63 flight engineer 

courses and all part 142 training center 

certificate holders conducting flight 

engineer training courses in accordance 

with part 63 to allow applicants who are 

training in preparation for the flight 

engineer practical test to take the 

normal procedures portion of that test in 

an approved flight simulation device. 

Grant, 5/20/2005, Exemption No. 

4901I. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9379. 

Petitioner: Air Transport Association 

of America, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.613, 121.619(a), and 121.625. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Air transport 

Association, Inc., member airlines and 

other similarly situated part 121 

operators to continue to dispatch 

airplanes under instrument flight rules 

when conditional language in a onetime increment of the weather forecast 

states that the weather at the 

destination, alternate airport, or both 

airports could be below the authorized 

weather minimums when other time 

increments of the weather forecast state 

that weather conditions will be at or 

above the authorized weather 

minimums. 

Grant, 5/26/05, Exemption No. 

3585O. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21194. 

Petitioner: Black Hills Aerial 

Adventures, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Black Hills 

Aerial Adventures Inc., to operate 

certain aircraft under part 135 without 

a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder 

installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 5/26/2005, Exemption No. 

8559. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–14242. 

Petitioner: World Airways, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.434(c)(1)(ii). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit World Airways, 

Inc., to substitute a qualified and 

authorized check airman or aircrew 

program designee for an Federal 

Aviation Administration inspector to 

observe a qualifying pilot in command 

and who is completing initial or 

upgrade training specified in § 121.424 

during at least on flight leg that include 

a takeoff and a landing. 

Grant, 5/27/2005, Exemption No. 

8058A. 

[FR Doc. 05–17216 Filed 8–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Summary Notice No. PE–2005–46] 

Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions 

of Petitions Issued 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of disposition of prior 

petition. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking 

provisions governing the application, 

processing, and disposition of petitions 

for exemption, part 11 of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this 

notice contains the disposition of 

certain petitions previously received. 

The purpose of this notice is to improve 

the public’s awareness of, and 

participation in, this aspect of FAA’s 

regulatory activities. Neither publication 

of this notice nor the inclusion or