alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Project Proposal/Possible Action, (5) Sub-Committee Reports, (6) Chairman's Perspective, (7) General Discussion, (8) County Update, (9) Next Agenda.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on September 8, 2005 from 9 a.m. and end at approximately 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, Conference Room A, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 164, Elk Creek, CA 95939; (530) 968-5329; E-mail                         *ggaddini@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service Staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by September 6, 2005 will have the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

Dated: August 24, 2005.

Art Quintana,

Acting Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 05-17262 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Patricia Dawn ABSHIRE.

No. 459A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

J. Joy Strickland, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

James N. Freeman, Jr., Elkin, for Abshire.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 666 S.E.2d 657.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 3rd day of October 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by State of NC on the 3rd day of October 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."

Accordingly, the new brief of the State of NC shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
# Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1008Show full title

Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1008 of 25 June 2015 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against            Iran         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1008                     

# of 25 June 2015

# amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing                           Common Position 2007/140/CFSP(1), and in particular Article 23(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 26 July 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/413/CFSP.

(2)In accordance with Article 26(3) of Decision 2010/413/CFSP, the Council has reviewed the list of designated persons and entities                              set out in Annex II to that Decision.

(3)One person and eight entities should be removed from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures, set                              out in Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP.

(4)In addition, the entries concerning six entities subject to restrictive measures, set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP,                              should be amended.

(5)Decision 2010/413/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 25 June 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

E. Rinkēvičs                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### 1.The entries relating to the persons and entities listed below are deleted from the list set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP.U.K.

Persons and entities involved in nuclear or ballistic missile activities and persons and entities providing support to the                              Government of Iran.                           

#### A.PersonsU.K.

##### 5.Mahmood JANNATIANU.K.

#### B.EntitiesU.K.

##### 160.CF Sharp and Company Private LimitedU.K.

Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL)

#### B.EntitiesU.K.

##### 60.Bright-Nord GmbH und Co. KGU.K.

##### 63.Cosy-East GmbH und Co. KGU.K.

##### 86.Great-West GmbH und Co. KGU.K.

##### 87.Happy-Süd GmbH und Co. KGU.K.

##### 127.NHL Basic LtdU.K.

##### 128.NHL Nordland GmbHU.K.

##### 132.Prosper Basic GmbHU.K.

### 2.The following entries replace the entries concerning the entities listed below, set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP.U.K.

Persons and entities involved in nuclear or ballistic missile activities and persons and entities providing support to the                              Government of Iran.                           

#### B.EntitiesU.K.

1

OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39.
ADAMS CREEK ASSOCIATES, a North Carolina Limited Partnership with Billy Dean Brown, General Partner v. Melvin DAVIS and Licurtis Reels.

No. 3P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Julius L. Chambers, Charlotte, Anita S. Earls, for Davis & Reels.

*901Claud R. Wheatly, III, Beaufort, for Adams Creek Asso.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 652 S.E.2d 677.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendants on the 3rd day of January 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of January 2008 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th day of January 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
csgs-ex1025aj_183.htm



Pages where confidential treatment has been requested are stamped “Confidential Treatment Requested and the Redacted Material has been separately filed with the Commission,” and places where information has been redacted have been marked with (***). 

Exhibit 10.25AJ

 

THIRTY-NINTH AMENDMENT

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CSG MASTER SUBSCRIBER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CSG SYSTEMS, INC.

AND

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC

 

 

This Thirty-ninth Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made by and between CSG Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CSG”), and Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Customer”).  CSG and Customer entered into that certain Amended and Restated CSG Master Subscriber Management System Agreement dated February 9, 2009, as amended (the “Agreement”), and now desire to further amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.  If the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment shall be in conflict with the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control.  Any terms in initial capital letters or all capital letters used as a defined term but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.  Upon execution of this Amendment by the parties, any subsequent reference to the Agreement between the parties shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.  Except as amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect according to their terms. 

 

 

 CSG and Customer agree to the following as of the Effective Date:

 

1.    Customer agrees to purchase an additional *********** (**) Vantage User IDs.  Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the Eighth Amendment to the Agreement dated January 5, 2010 (CSG document number 2301676), the Twenty-fifth Amendment dated March 12, 2012 (CSG document number 2311963) and the Thirty-second Amendment dated August 8, 2012 (CSG document number 2313710), the number of Vantage User IDs will be increased from *** ******* *********** (***) to *** ******* *********** (***) and Customer shall be invoiced accordingly. 

 

 

THIS AMENDMENT is executed on the day and year last signed below (the “Effective Date”).

 


		
	
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC (“CUSTOMER”)

 

By: Charter Communications, Inc., its Manager
	
CSG SYSTEMS, INC. (“CSG”)

	
 

 

By: /s/ Michael Ciszek
	
 

 

By:  /s/ Joseph T. Ruble

	
 

Title:  VP Billing Strategy & Operations
	
 

Title:  EVP, CAO & General Counsel

	
 

Name:  Michael Ciszek
	
 

Name:  Joseph T. Ruble

	
 

Date:  6/7/2013
	
 

Date:  7 June 2013
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership
(ERPOP) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Parrell, Chief Financial Officer of Equity Residential, general
partner of ERPOP, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark J. Parrell                                    
|Mark J. Parrell                                        
|Chief Financial Officer of Registrants General Partner
|May 7, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Western Wireless Corporation, a Washington corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

          The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March
          31, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 15, 2004

                                                By: /s/ M. WAYNE WISEHART
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    M. Wayne Wisehart
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
STATE v. Derrick WHEELER.

No. 371P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Russell J. Hollers, III, Durham, for Wheeler.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of April 2008 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      176
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,302
<PP&E>                                             630
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (116)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,142
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,847
<SALES>                                         13,731
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,731
<CGS>                                            9,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,982
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 771
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,718)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.18)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.02**CERTIFICATION**I, Theresa D. Becks, Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing operator ofThe Campbell Fund Trust. (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks          Theresa D. Becks    Chief Financial Officer    March 31, 2006  
E 3
STATE of North Carolina v. Roger Dale HOWELL.

No. 369P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Glenn Gerding, for Howell.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 646 S.E.2d 622.

*491*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 27th day of July 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 730, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of July 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
Amendment No. 2 to the Letter Agreement - New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.4 

 
  
 From: Diarmuid O’Connell 
 Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 11:39 PM 

To: jdidonato@huronconsultinggroup.com; Mike Taylor 
 Cc: KMcKenzie@nummi.com; jbeard@huronconsultinggroup.com; [Email address intentionally omitted.]; [Email address intentionally omitted.]; jpotts@nummi.com; PAitelli@mofo.com; HKang@mofo.com;
MSteel@mofo.com; charding@telsamotors.com; dedwards@nummi.com; 
 Deepak Ahuja 
 Subject: RE: Letter Agreement Extension 
 John - 

Acknowledged and agreed. 
 Best, Diarmuid

 From: jdidonato@huronconsultinggroup.com [mailto:jdidonato@huronconsultinggroup.com] 

Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 11:36 PM 

To: Diarmuid O’Connell; Mike Taylor 
 Cc:
KMcKenzie@nummi.com; jbeard@huronconsultinggroup.com; 
 [Email address intentionally omitted.]; [Email address intentionally omitted.];
jpotts@nummi.com; PAitelli@mofo.com; 
 HKang@mofo.com; MSteel@mofo.com; charding@telsamotors.com; dedwards@nummi.com 

Subject: Letter Agreement Extension 
 Diarmuid
and Mike: 
 Please acknowledge and agree to the below by return email: 
 Re: Letter Agreement dated May 26, 2010 by and between New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., a California corporation (“Seller”), and Tesla Motors, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(“Buyer”) (the “Original Letter Agreement”), as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Letter Agreement dated June 15, 2010 (“Amendment No. 1”, and together with the Original Letter Agreement, the
“Letter Agreement”). Except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Letter Agreement. 

The parties hereby agree that the Closing Date, as originally defined in Section 4(a) of the Letter Agreement, is hereby amended such that the
Closing Date shall be October 8, 2010, or such 







 
other earlier date as Buyer and Seller may mutually agreed upon in writing. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as Seller waiving any rights or remedies Seller may have under the Letter
Agreement in the event Buyer fails to consummate the Closing by the Closing Date or that Seller is agreeing in advance to an extension of the Closing Date beyond the extension provided in this paragraph. 

John C. DiDonato 
 President and Chief
Restructuring Officer 
 NUMMI 
 Cell
phone: [Intentionally omitted.] 
 Email address: jdidonato@huronconsultinggroup.com 
 DISCLAIMER: 
 The information transmitted in this e-mail message and attachments, if any, may be
attorney-client information, including privileged and confidential matter, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. Distribution to, or review by, unauthorized persons is strictly prohibited. All personal messages
express views solely of the sender, which are not to be attributed to any organization. If you have received this transmission in error, immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this transmission including attachments.