alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004088EN.01028902.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/289 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/289

---

(2004/C 88 E/0296)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2081/02

by Christoph Konrad (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(8 July 2002)

Subject:   Use of Objective 2 funding in North-Rhine-Westphalia

Subject:

A big firm in Mülheim, North-Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), needs to move from its current location due to continuous expansion and is looking for a new site. There are two serious contenders in NRW: Mülheim and Oberhausen. Oberhausen town council has announced that it would make a EUR 1,5 million investment grant available under the Land government's regional economic development programme, which is known to be co-financed by Objective 2 funding from the EU, if the firm chose to relocate to Oberhausen. As Mülheim is not an Objective 2 area, it would not get a look-in.

Does the Commission consider this to be legitimate use of Objective 2 funding?

If so, under what conditions may a town/city or Land use such funding to ensure that it is successful when competing against other towns/cities or Länder to attract companies looking for new sites?

If not, what action should, in its opinion, be taken in such cases?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(12 August 2002)

(12 August 2002)

The Oberhausen town council has no authority with regard to the approval of projects for financial support under the North Rhine Westphalia Objective 2 Single Programming Document (SPD). This responsibility belongs only to the managing authority which is the regional government of North Rhine Westphalia in this case.

Support for private investments under the SPD is in general restricted to small and medium-sized enterprises. As an exception, big companies can be supported where they contribute to building the strength of the region, for example, under measure 2.8, ‘new energies’ or measure 3.4, ‘logistics’.

Decisions on company location are a responsibility for the management which must take into account all the circumstances prevailing. Such decisions are unlikely to be influenced solely by opportunities for financial support from public sources. In addition, all public support of this kind, whether it is of national or Community origin, has to respect Community legislation concerning State aids.

With regard to the Structural Funds, the rules in force envisage two measures that are intended to limit the effects of relocation for companies in receipt of EU support. First, in the Commission's guidelines on national regional aid (1), it is required that recipients of EU support must maintain, for a five-year period, any investment or any jobs thus created. Secondly, Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (2) stipulates that the contribution of European funds in productive activities is conditional on the location of these activities remaining unchanged during five years following the decision to grant support.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 10.3.1998.

1

(2)  OJ L 161, 26.6.1999.

2

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                                  CERTIFICATION


         In connection with the periodic report of Glenborough Realty Trust
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Stephen R.
Saul, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date: May 15, 2003           /s/ Stephen R. Saul
                             --------------------------------------------
                             Stephen R. Saul
                             Chief Financial Officer
                             Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50377-50378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Establishment

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. Appendix 2), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 
announces the establishment of the National Commission on Digestive 
Diseases (Commission).
    This Commission shall conduct an overview of the state-of-the-
science in the field of digestive diseases research and develop a long-
range plan for digestive diseases research consistent with the research 
mission of NIH. The overall plan will focus on the goal of improving 
the health of the nation through digestive diseases research and will 
include specific objectives and goals and a recommended time line for 
their implementation. Recommendations shall be made to the Director, 
NIH and to Congress.
    The Commission shall be composed of 16 members appointed by the 
Director, NIH and 18 nonvoting ex officio members. Of the appointed 
members, who shall have a broad diversity of scientific and 
professional experience, 12 shall be knowledgeable about digestive 
diseases as members of academic or medical research and practice 
communities involved in digestive diseases research, including

[[Page 50378]]

individuals in allied health specialties relevant to digestive diseases 
research. Four members shall be appointed who have close personal or 
family experience with digestive diseases or experience with patient-
oriented organizations in digestive diseases.
    Unless renewed by appropriate action prior to its expiration, the 
Charter for the National Commission on Digestive Diseases will expire 
two years from the date of establishment.

    Dated: August 16, 2005.
Elias A. Zerhouni,
Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 05-17012 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[799 NYS2d 152]

#### In the Matter of Robert John Benfatto, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

July 25, 2005

*204APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Diana Maxfield Kearse,*Brooklyn, for petitioner.

*Flamhaft Levy Kamins & Hirsch,*Brooklyn *(Barry Kamins*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The Grievance Committee served the respondent with a petition dated July 8, 2004, containing a single charge of professional misconduct. After a hearing on September 22, 2004, the Special Referee sustained the charge. The petitioner now moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report and to impose such discipline as the Court deems appropriate. The respondent’s counsel has submitted an affirmation in response in which he asks that the Special Referee’s report be confirmed and that, based upon all of the mitigating evidence, the Court impose a censure upon the respondent.

Charge One alleges that the respondent was convicted in the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of attempt to commit a violation of Election Law § 14-120, a class B misdemeanor. He was sentenced to a conditional discharge and a $1,000 civil fine.

Inasmuch as the charge was totally uncontroverted, the motion to confirm the Special Referee’s report is granted.

In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to impose, the petitioner notes that the respondent’s disciplinary histoiy consists of a letter of caution dated December 15, 1998, for failing to reregister as an attorney with the Office of Court Administration. The respondent asks the Court to consider his cooperation, his acceptance of responsibility for his lapse in judgment, and his expressed remorse. The District Attorney’s office submits that the respondent’s culpability was considerably less than that of former Councilman Leffler, the public official who directed him to engage in certain conduct, and who sought to directly benefit from the scheme.

Under the totality of circumstances, the respondent is publicly censured for his professional misconduct.

Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

*205Ordered that the petitioner’s motion to confirm the Special Referee’s report is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is publicly censured for his professional misconduct.
STATE v. STAFFORD.

No. COA07-1124.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS57383).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 4.3


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated August 2, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-211870) of Smart Trust 258,
comprising Smart Trust, Zacks GARP Composite 35 Trust, Series 10.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


August 2, 2016
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Board of Directors

 

MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-20829, No. 333-20833and No. 333-3764) of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. of our report dated October 14,2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, comprehensive income, changes in capital, and cash flows for theyear then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2004, annualreport on Form 10-K/A of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.

 
| KPMG LLP              |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
| Denver, CO            |
| October 19, 2005 |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001044847
<NAME> SURREY INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             159
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (30)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,720
<PP&E>                                           2,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,301)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,718
<BONDS>                                          1,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           393
<OTHER-SE>                                         605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,228
<SALES>                                          7,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,336
<CGS>                                            5,485
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (10)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    113
<INCOME-TAX>                                        47
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 66
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        66
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03



</TABLE>
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                                                                                                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  August 29,  2011 |   /s/ David K. Young                                                                                                                      |   |
|                                        | David K. Young                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                                        | President, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |   |

----

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00017-CV

Cynthia Ann TURNER,

Appellant

v.

Troy Adam TURNER,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CVG-002200-C1

Honorable Alvino (Ben) Morales, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 5, 2014

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties regarding the 

assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
David Paul WOODRING v. James L. BAKER, Jr., Judge, Glenn Hodges, Clerk.

No. 375P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

David Paul Woodring, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery. Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 14th day of August 2008 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Watauga County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 26th day of August 2008."
# C_2023286EN.01003501.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/35

---

Action brought on 16 June 2023 — Nehera and Others v EUIPO — Zdút (nehera)

(Case T-334/23)

(2023/C 286/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicants: Isabel Nehera (Sutton, Ontario, Canada), Natacha Sehnal (Montferrier-sur-Lez, France), Jean-Henri Nehera (Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada) (represented by: W. Woll, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ladislav Zdút (Bratislava, Slovakia)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark nehera — European Union trade mark No 11 794 112

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 April 2023 in Case R 1216/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs and those incurred by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, including the necessary costs incurred in the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and those incurred by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, including the necessary costs incurred in the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal;

| — | order EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the applicants.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of the right to a fair trial; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the right to a fair trial;

| — | Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

---
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 479/2014Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 479/2014 of 12 May 2014 implementing Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain            specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 479/2014                     

# of 12 May 2014

# implementing Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and                        entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 of 12 April 2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed                           against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire(1), and in particular Article 11a(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 12 April 2005, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 560/2005.

(2)The Council carried out a review of the list set out in Annex IA to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005, in accordance with Article 11a(6)                              of that Regulation.

(3)The Council has determined that there are no longer grounds for keeping one person on the list set out in Annex IA to Regulation                              (EC) No 560/2005.

(4)In addition, the information in relation to two persons on the list set out in Annex IA to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 should                              be updated.

(5)Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex IA to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Annex IA to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 is amended as follows:

The entry for the following person is replaced by the following:

The entry for the following person is renamed as follows:

‘Justin Koné Katina’ is replaced by ‘Justin Koné Katinan’

The entry for the following person is deleted:

Oulaï Delafosse

1

OJ L 95, 14.4.2005, p. 1.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 434 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to permit qualifying States 

to use a portion of their allotments under the State children’s health 

insurance program for any fiscal year for certain medicaid expenditures. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2007 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. REED, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. 

LIEBERMAN, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. COLEMAN, and Mr. INOUYE) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to permit 

qualifying States to use a portion of their allotments 

under the State children’s health insurance program for 

any fiscal year for certain medicaid expenditures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Health Eq5 uity Technical Amendments Act of 2007’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 434 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR QUALIFYING STATES TO USE POR2 TION OF SCHIP ALLOTMENT FOR ANY FISCAL 

3 YEAR FOR CERTAIN MEDICAID EXPENDI4 TURES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2105(g)(1)(A) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397ee(g)(1)(A)), as amend7 ed by section 201(b) of the National Institutes of Health 

8 Reform Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–482) is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘fiscal year 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 

10 2005, 2006, or 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘a fiscal year’’. 

11 (b) MODIFICATION OF ALLOWABLE EXPENDI12 TURES.—Section 2105(g)(1)(B)(ii) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

13 1397ee(g)(1)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘150’’ and in14 serting ‘‘125’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall take effect on October 1, 2007, and shall 

17 apply to expenditures made on or after that date. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (ERPOP) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Parrell, Chief Financial Officer of Equity Residential, general partner of ERPOP, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark J. Parrell                                   
|Mark J. Parrell                                       
|Chief Financial Officerof Registrants General Partner
|August 5, 2010