alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 528 

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to prohibit the Secretary of 

Agriculture from basing minimum prices for Class I milk on the distance 

or transportation costs from any location that is not within a marketing 

area, except under certain circumstances, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2007 

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to prohibit the 

Secretary of Agriculture from basing minimum prices 

for Class I milk on the distance or transportation costs 

from any location that is not within a marketing area, 

except under certain circumstances, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Milk Mar5 keting Reform Act of 2007’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•S 528 IS

1 SEC. 2. LOCATION ADJUSTMENTS FOR MINIMUM PRICES 

2 FOR CLASS I MILK. 

3 Section 8c(5) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 

4 U.S.C. 608c(5)), reenacted with amendments by the Agri5 cultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (A)— 

7 (A) in clause (3) of the second sentence, by 

8 inserting after ‘‘the locations’’ the following: 

9 ‘‘within a marketing area subject to the order’’; 

10 and 

11 (B) by striking the last 2 sentences and in12 serting the following: ‘‘Notwithstanding sub13 section (18) or any other provision of law, when 

14 fixing minimum prices for milk of the highest 

15 use classification in a marketing area subject to 

16 an order under this subsection, the Secretary 

17 may not, directly or indirectly, base the prices 

18 on the distance from, or all or part of the costs 

19 incurred to transport milk to or from, any loca20 tion that is not within the marketing area sub21 ject to the order, unless milk from the location 

22 constitutes at least 50 percent of the total sup23 ply of milk of the highest use classification in 

24 the marketing area. The Secretary shall report 

25 to the Committee on Agriculture of the House 

26 of Representatives and the Committee on Agrimstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•S 528 IS

1 culture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate 

2 on the criteria that are used as the basis for the 

3 minimum prices referred to in the preceding 

4 sentence, including a certification that the min5 imum prices are made in accordance with the 

6 preceding sentence.’’; and 

7 (2) in paragraph (B)(ii)(c), by inserting after 

8 ‘‘the locations’’ the following: ‘‘within a marketing 

9 area subject to the order’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3633 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3633

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require country of 
      origin labeling on prescription and over-the-counter drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 26 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

   Mr. Brown introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require country of 
      origin labeling on prescription and over-the-counter drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency in Drug Labeling Act''.

SEC. 2. COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELING FOR DRUGS.

    (a) In General.--Section 502 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 352) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(aa)(1) If it is a drug subject to section 503(b)(1) in final 
dosage form, unless the labeling of such drug bears the following 2 
separate lists:
            ``(A) The identity of the country of manufacture of each 
        active ingredient of the drug, listed in descending order based 
        on the percentage of the number of active ingredients in the 
        final dosage form manufactured in such countries.
            ``(B) The identity of the country of manufacture of each 
        inactive ingredient of the drug, listed in descending order 
        based on the percentage of the number of inactive ingredients 
        in the final dosage form manufactured in such countries.
    ``(2) If it is a nonprescription drug (as defined in section 760), 
unless the label of such drug bears the following 2 separate lists:
            ``(A) The identity of the country of manufacture of each 
        active ingredient of the drug, listed in descending order based 
        on the percentage of the number of active ingredients in such 
        drug manufactured in such countries.
            ``(B) The identity of the country of manufacture of each 
        inactive ingredient of the drug, listed in descending order 
        based on the percentage of the number of inactive ingredients 
        in such drug manufactured in such countries.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 321/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 321/2014 of 27 March 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 321/2014                     

# of 27 March 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 March 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# C_2023252EN.01002601.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 18 April 2023 — P. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie

(Case C-241/23, Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie)

(2023/C 252/30)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: P. sp. z o.o.

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie

Question referred

Is consideration obtained or to be obtained by the supplier in return for a supply of goods, as referred to in Article 73 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) to be understood as meaning the nominal value of the shares acquired or the issue value, if the parties have stipulated that the consideration is to be the issue value of the shares?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         4,392,623
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,320,918
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         2,842,889
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           2,838,309
<LOANS>                                        119,897,542
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,002,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,735,211
<DEPOSITS>                                     82,770,398
<SHORT-TERM>                                   16,630,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,618,831
<LONG-TERM>                                    19,608,333
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,712
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,096,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 137,735,211
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                9,156,941
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              193,795
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               185,682
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               9,536,418
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,863,665
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,498,899
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5,037,519
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  209,800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3,752,572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,665,044
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,665,044
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,046,444
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.96
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 8.49
<LOANS-NON>                                    533,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   149,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                661,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               909,471
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  121,204
<RECOVERIES>                                   4,493
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,002,760
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,002,760
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6725
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEVELT FRANCOIS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-88-51-A) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Levelt Francois, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford Chesnut, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to set aside his sentence. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Francois , No. CR-88-51-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Allen J. Lauer, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Intermec, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 29, 2013



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Allen J. Lauer     
|Chief Executive Officer
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 308/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 308/2014 of 20 March 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Almendra de Mallorca/Almendra Mallorquina/Ametlla de Mallorca/Ametlla Mallorquina            (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 308/2014                     

# of 20 March 2014

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Almendra de Mallorca/Almendra                        Mallorquina/Ametlla de Mallorca/Ametlla Mallorquina (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Almendra de Mallorca’/‘Almendra                              Mallorquina’/‘Ametlla de Mallorca’/‘Ametlla Mallorquina’ was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Almendra de Mallorca’/‘Almendra Mallorquina’/‘Ametlla de Mallorca’/‘Ametlla Mallorquina’ should therefore be entered in the                              register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.6.****Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed**U.K.

#### SPAINU.K.

Almendra de Mallorca/Almendra Mallorquina/Ametlla de Mallorca/Ametlla Mallorquina (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 317, 31.10.2013, p. 8.
#### Karen Nisim, Appellant, v Gideon Kay, D.D.S., P.C., Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 600]

In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Glover, J.), dated March 31, 2004, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that she was not entitled to the benefit of the continuous treatment doctrine and any claims arising out of the defendant’s conduct that occurred before November 2, 1998, are time-barred *(see*CPLR 214-a).

The Supreme Court also correctly determined that the evidentiary submissions made on the motion by the defendant established that the services provided by the defendant on teeth 18 and 22 did not deviate from accepted standards of dental care, thus meeting his burden as a proponent of a motion for summary judgment *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to come forward with evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d .557 [1980]). Therefore, the defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.2









AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT




This Amendment relates to the Change of Control Agreement dated as of September 30, 2013 (the “Agreement”) between Rockwell Automation, Inc. (the “Company”) and Blake D. Moret (the “Executive”). 


The Company and the Executive agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


1.Section 6(a)(i)C is amended to change the multiplier from two to three to read as follows:


C.  subject to Section 6(e) of this Agreement, the amount equal to the product of (1) three and (2) the sum of (x) the Executive’s Annual Base Salary and (y) the Executive’s target Annual Bonus payable under the Company’s annual incentive plan in effect with respect to the fiscal year in which the Date of Termination occurs.


2.Section 6(a)(ii) is amended to change all references to the period after the Executive’s Date of Termination from two years to three years.


3.    In all other respects, the Agreement is hereby reconfirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.


This Amendment has been duly executed by the Company and the Executive as of the 1st day of July, 2016. 
 
                
	
			
	 
	 
	ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/    DOUGLAS M. HAGERMAN        

	 
	 
	Douglas M. Hagerman

	 
	 
	Senior Vice President, General Counsel                    and Secretary

	 
	 
	 

	Executive

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ BLAKE D. MORET

	Blake D. Moret
# C_2023271EN.01001602.xml

| 31.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 25 May 2023 — DS v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt

(Case C-323/23, Pensionsversicherungsanstalt)

(2023/C 271/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DS

Defendant: Pensionsversicherungsanstalt

Question referred

Is Article 7 of Directive 2004/38/EC, (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an economically inactive [Union citizen] may not be a burden on the social assistance system within the meaning of that directive, if he resides in the host Member State for more than three months, but for less than five years, and derives his right of residence only from his capacity as the spouse (Article 2(2)(a) of the [directive]) of a ... Union citizen employed in the host Member State (migrant worker) (Article 7(1)(d) of the [directive]), but does not himself have an original right of residence under Article 7(1)(a), (b) or (c) of the Directive?

---

(1)  Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77).

---