alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LINEBERGER v. NCDOC, et al.

No. 141P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 4, 2008.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for Lineberger.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 657 S.E.2d 673.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of April 2008 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of April 2008."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 22/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 22/2014 of 10 January 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 22/2014                     

# of 10 January 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 January 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
PARKER v. TOWN OF FOUR OAKS.

No. COA06-1370.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 17, 2007.

Certification Date August 6, 2007.

Appeal from Johnston (06CVS1696).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Roque Toledo MOSQUEDA.

No. 566P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Roque T. Mosqueda, Pro Se.

LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th day of November 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
# C_2023112EN.01004201.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/42

---

Action brought on 8 February 2023 — Tiendanimal/EUIPO — Salvana Tiernahrung (SALVAJE)

(Case T-55/23)

(2023/C 112/54)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Tiendanimal Comercio Electronico de Articulos para Mascotas, SL (Malaga, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Salvana Tiernahrung GmbH (Klein Offenseth-Sparrieshoop, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark SALVAJE — Application for registration No 14 882 666

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 November 2022 in Case R 2192/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | revoke the contested decision as well as the refusal of European trademark application No 14 882 666 SALVAJE (and design) in Class 31 and part of the services in Class 35; and |
| --- | --- |

—

revoke the contested decision as well as the refusal of European trademark application No 14 882 666 SALVAJE (and design) in Class 31 and part of the services in Class 35; and

| — | order the defendant and Salvana Tiernahrung GmbH, in case it decides to intervene in the present proceedings, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and Salvana Tiernahrung GmbH, in case it decides to intervene in the present proceedings, to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

#### **CERTIFICATIONS OFPERIODIC REPORT**

#### ** **

I,John R. Serino, President and Chief Executive Officer of Encision Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

·                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the three months ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 

Dated:    February 13, 2009

 

|   | /s/  John R. Serino          |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |                         |   |
|   | John  R. Serino              |   |
|   | Principal  Executive Officer |   |

 

 

 

I,Marcia McHaffie, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of Encision Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

·                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the three months ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 

Dated:    February 13, 2009

 

|   | /s/  Marcia McHaffie                                                      |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                      |   |
|   | Marcia  McHaffie                                                          |   |
|   | Controller,  Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
manh-ex101_7.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 



 

 

July 27, 2016

 

Dennis B. Story

3838 Allenhurst Drive

Norcross, GA 30092

 

Dear Dennis,

 

This letter is to outline the terms under which I am pleased to welcome you back as our EVP, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

Start Date: July 31, 2016 (“Start Date”)

 

Compensation: Same as in effect prior to July 1, 2016, subject to the following terms regarding equity.

 

Equity: Given that all your unvested RSUs outstanding as of June 30, 2016, were terminated, we will grant you 70,000 service (i.e., time-based) RSUs under the terms of our standard Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Employees, to vest in four installments of 25% on January 31 of each of the years 2017 – 2020.

 

Remaining Terms: The remaining terms of your employment will be in accordance with the terms of your Executive Employment Agreement with the Company, dated March 29, 2013, which, effective on the Start Date, will be reinstated. Also, effective on the Start Date, your Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement, dated March 29, 2013, will be reinstated. Further, to the extent you took advantage or intended to take advantage of the offer the Company made to you on or about July 2015 in connection with the purchase of term life insurance on your life, that benefit will continue.

 

Dennis, please confirm your acceptance of the terms of this letter by signing below and returning a copy to me.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

/s/ Eddie Capel

Eddie Capel

President and CEO

 

Confirmed:

 

 

/s/ Dennis B. StoryDate: July 27, 2016

Dennis B. Story

 

 

 

 



" ""
#  

# **Exhibit 32.1**

#  

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

#  

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,the Chief Executive Officer of Western Sizzlin Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2008 and the financial statements contained therein, fully comply with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q and thefinancial statements thereto fairly present, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 31,2008, and the period then ended.

 
| /s/ Sardar Biglari |   | Date: May 15, 2008 |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10134]


Maine Disaster Number ME-00003

AGENCY: Small Business Administration

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for public assistance only for the State of Maine (FEMA-
1591-DR), dated 06/29/2005.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Snow Melt, and Ice Jams.
    Incident Period: 03/29/2005 through 05/03/2005.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/10/2005.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/29/2005.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort 
Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 
6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Maine, 
dated 06/29/2005, is hereby amended to include the following areas as 
adversely affected by the disaster.
Primary Counties:
    Aroostook
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008.)
Becky C. Brantley,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05-17586 Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

TAJHON WILSON

,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2024

- 0194

June 5, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for

Pinellas County ; Susan St. John, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SMITH , JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Company NameJuly 14, 2010
By:
/s/ George MorrisGeorge MorrisChief Financial Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1


             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the Annual Report of Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc. (the
 "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2002 as filed
 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
 "Report"), I, Kenneth E. Stinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.





 /s/ Kenneth E. Stinson
-----------------------------
Kenneth E. Stinson
Chief Executive Officer
March 14, 2003
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00792-CV

Eugenia Woodard 

v.

Fortress Insurance Company and Ronnie Elmore, D.D.S.

NO. 2014-09985 IN THE 215TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

SUPP CLK RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING

FILING

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

$15.00

$10.00

$25.00

$20.00

$174.00

$1.00

$10.00

$30.00

03/17/2015

01/23/2015

12/23/2014

12/08/2014

12/08/2014

12/08/2014

12/03/2014

10/08/2014

PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

PAID

ANT

APE

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

APE

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$285.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this July 17, 2015.
# C_2023321EN.01006701.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/67

---

Action brought on 31 July 2023 — Marcandita/EUIPO — Euronext (bnext)

(Case T-439/23)

(2023/C 321/76)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Marcandita, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Gracia Albero and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Euronext NV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark bnext — Application for registration No 18 309 107

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2023 in Case R 2111/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings before the General Court and order the intervener to pay the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Forth Board of Appeal EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings before the General Court and order the intervener to pay the costs deriving from the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Forth Board of Appeal EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>


EX-32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I-Element Corporation, Inc. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of I-Element Corporation on Form 10-KSB for
the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ivan Zweig, Chief Executive
Officer of I-Element Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of INFe-Human
Resources, Inc.

Date: June 29, 2006

/s/ Ivan Zweig
-----------------
Ivan Zweig
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Ivan Zweig
-----------------
Ivan Zweig
Chief Financial Officer
IN RE S.J.

No. COA08-132.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 3, 2008.

Certification Date June 23, 2008.

Appeal from Pitt (06JT64).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT.

No. 272A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2008.

David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Greensboro, for Harleysvilie Mutual Ins. Co.

Mack Sperling, John S. Buford, Greensboro, Cecilia O. Miller, Diana S. Casey, San Diego, CA, for International Garment Tech.

Gary K. Sue, Greensboro, for Erie Insurance.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th day of June 2008 by Defendants for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendants (Erie Insurance) shall file their brief within 30 days of the Court's order allowing or denying the Plaintiffs Petition for Discretionary Review. By order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of June 2008."
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1092 

KA 09-02632 

PRESENT: FAHEY, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KENNETH T. HYSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (TIMOTHY S. DAVIS OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Alex R. Renzi,

J.), rendered July 8, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon

his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law §

160.10 [2] [b]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record

establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived

the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256),

and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the

severity of the sentence (see id. at 255; People v Lococo, 92 NY2d

825, 827; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). We reject defendant’s

further contention that his right to counsel was violated when County

Court denied his request for a new attorney without making an inquiry

into his reasons for the request. Defendant’s request for a new

attorney was wholly lacking in “specific factual allegations of

‘serious complaints about counsel’ ” (People v Porto, 16 NY3d 93,

100). We note in any event that, at the next court date following

defendant’s request for a new attorney, which was to be a conditional

examination of the elderly victim, defendant accepted a plea offer

with sentencing consideration that was more favorable than the prior

offer. Indeed, based on the court’s statements at sentencing, it

appears that the sentence was considerably more favorable than the

sentence that the court would have imposed but for the sentencing

parameters agreed to as part of the plea. 

Entered: November 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court