alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 441 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 441

To permit certain school districts in Illinois to be reconstituted for 
    purposes of determining assistance under the Impact Aid program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2007

 Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Obama) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit certain school districts in Illinois to be reconstituted for 
    purposes of determining assistance under the Impact Aid program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR IMPACT AID PAYMENT.

    (a) Local Educational Agencies.--Notwithstanding section 8013(9)(B) 
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
7713(9)(B)), North Chicago Community Unit School District 187, North 
Shore District 112, and Township High School District 113 in Lake 
County, Illinois, and Glenview Public School District 34 and Glenbrook 
High School District 225 in Cook County, Illinois, shall be considered 
local educational agencies as such term is used in and for purposes of 
title VIII of such Act.
    (b) Computation.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
federally connected children (as determined under section 8003(a) of 
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(a))) 
who are in attendance in the North Shore District 112, Township High 
School District 113, Glenview Public School District 34, and Glenbrook 
High School District 225 described in subsection (a), shall be 
considered to be in attendance in the North Chicago Community Unit 
School District 187 described in subsection (a) for purposes of 
computing the amount that the North Chicago Community Unit School 
District 187 is eligible to receive under subsection (b) or (d) of such 
section if--
            (1) such school districts have entered into an agreement 
        for such students to be so considered and for the equitable 
        apportionment among all such school districts of any amount 
        received by the North Chicago Community Unit School District 
        187 under such section; and
            (2) any amount apportioned among all such school districts 
        pursuant to paragraph (1) is used by such school districts only 
        for the direct provision of educational services.
                                 <all>
```
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.5

 SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of November 15, 2010, by and among FIRST SOUTHWEST HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, on behalf of itself and all of its subsidiaries (collectively “Employer”), PLAINS CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Texas corporation (the “Company”), and W. ALLEN CUSTARD III
(“Executive”) for purposes of amending that certain Employment Agreement dated as of December 18, 2008, by and among Employer, the Company and Executive, as previously amended by that certain First Amendment to Employment
Agreement dated as of March 2, 2009 (the “Agreement”). Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted by Section 2 of the Agreement, the Company desires to expand Executive’s duties such
that effective November 15, 2010, Executive shall serve as the Executive Vice President, Corporate Development & Strategic Planning of the Company and Executive desires to consent to such change in duties. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions and covenants contained herein and in the Agreement, and other good
and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Effective
November 15, 2010, Section 2 of the Agreement is amended by replacing all references to “Managing Director” in the first and third sentences of said Section, respectively, with “Executive Vice President, Corporate
Development & Strategic Planning”. 
 2. Except as specifically amended, altered, modified and changed by this
Amendment and the First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of March 2, 2009, the Agreement remains in full force and effect as originally written. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 







  
 
			
	W. ALLEN CUSTARD III
		
	Executive:	 	 /s/ W. Allen Custard III

		
	Date:	 	 November 12, 2010

	
	FIRST SOUTHWEST HOLDINGS, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Hill A. Feinberg

		
	Its:	 	 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

		
	Date:	 	 November 12, 2010

	
	PLAINSCAPITAL CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Alan B. White

		
	Its:	 	 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

		
	Date:	 	 November 12, 2010




  
 2
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 955/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 955/2014 of 8 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 955/2014                     

# of 8 September 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                         RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Donald J. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Reckson Associates Realty
Corp. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1)       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                  and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 12, 2002

                                By /s/ Donald J. Rechler
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Donald J. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                           3,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,805
<INVENTORY>                                     33,077
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,970
<PP&E>                                          37,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,383
<BONDS>                                         33,608
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,983
<SALES>                                        120,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,403
<CGS>                                           74,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,281
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,873
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,679
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,194
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023252EN.01008002.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/80

---

Action brought on 2 June 2023 — Korkmaz v EUIPO — Intersnack Deutschland (CETOS)

(Case T-308/23)

(2023/C 252/97)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Elif Korkmaz (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Intersnack Deutschland SE (Cologne)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU trade mark CETOS — Application No 18 514 974

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 April 2023 in Case R 2031/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | uphold the claim; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the claim;

| — | dismiss the opponent’s claim/appellant’s appeal and confirm the decision of the Opposition Division of 14 October 2022 in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the opponent’s claim/appellant’s appeal and confirm the decision of the Opposition Division of 14 October 2022 in its entirety;

| — | order the opponent and appellant Intersnack Deutschland SE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the opponent and appellant Intersnack Deutschland SE to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

FRANK R. MCNALLY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 18 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR v. Willie D. GILBERT, II.

No. 194P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Eric Michaux, Durham, for Gilbert. A. Root Edmonson, for State Bar.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 663 S.E.2d 1.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of April 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
WHITE FOX CONST. CO., INC. v. MOUNTAIN GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH, INC.

No. COA07-963.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 19, 2008.

Certification Date September 8, 2008.

Appeal from Caldwell (04CVS67).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
GREENE v. COLBY.

No. COA08-155.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Brunswick (07CVD1526).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
WELLIVER McGUIRE, INC. v. MEMBERS INTERIOR CONST., INC.

No. COA08-408.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 2, 2008.

Certification Date December 22, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (06CVS6517).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Kofax Image Products, Inc.
Irvine, California

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement 
No. 333-40325 on Form S-8 of our report dated July 31, 1998 appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kofax Image Products, Inc. for year ended June 30,
1998.

Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report
also included the financial statement schedule of Kofax Image Products, Inc.,
listed in Item 14(a). This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

Costa Mesa, California
September 28, 1998
----

(2004/C 84 E/0008)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1350/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(10 April 2003)

Subject:   Cross-border investment

Is the Commission of the view that the introduction of the euro has boosted cross-border investment for the participating Member States? Will it update those figures given in previous parliamentary answers to me that showed a sharp increase in cross-border investment in the euro area that was an order of magnitude greater than the increase for the EU members not participating in the euro? Will it also give the figures individually for the five largest Member States of the EU?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(22 May 2003)

Data on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows for EU-15, split between Eurozone and EU-15/non-Eurozone countries, together with shares of each aggregate in the total EU-15 are sent direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat. Data for the Eurozone are available as from 1997. Annual rates of growth are also shown (First set of tables).

Data for the five bigger Member States in terms of FDI inflows, the share of the United Kingdom in EU 15 and annual growth rates are also given (Second set of tables).

Available data for Foreign Direct Investment indicate that the introduction of the euro had a favourable effect on cross-border investment for the participating Member States.

FDI data compiled by Eurostat show a much larger increase of FDI inflows in 1999 and 2000 for the euro area than for other Member States. This can be interpreted as an evidence of a positive impact of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) on cross-border direct investment. Nevertheless, it is important to bear in mind that EMU is only one of the factors that have affected euro-area FDI flows in recent years. In particular, FDI fluctuations have been clearly dominated by cyclical factors in the past two years. In 2001, the slowdown in merger activity and depressed economic conditions entailed a sharp drop in FDI inflows for both the euro area and other Member States.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000930429
<NAME> MONTEREY BAY BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,098
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,783
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     70,205
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             984
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               970
<LOANS>                                        235,480
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (1,315)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 327,127
<DEPOSITS>                                     216,768
<SHORT-TERM>                                    52,300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,715
<LONG-TERM>                                      8,582
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 327,127
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,395
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,901
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,296
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,981
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,328
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,968
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       22
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 118
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    608
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         608
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.43
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,199
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   376
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,362
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (108)
<RECOVERIES>                                        39
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,315
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,315
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 526 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the scope of programs 

of education for which accelerated payments of educational assistance 

under the Montgomery GI Bill may be used, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2007 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself, Mr. CHAMBLISS, and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the scope 

of programs of education for which accelerated payments 

of educational assistance under the Montgomery GI Bill 

may be used, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Employment 

5 and Training Act of 2007’’ or the ‘‘VET Act’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•S 526 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF PROGRAMS OF EDUCATION ELIGI2 BLE FOR ACCELERATED PAYMENT OF EDU3 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE UNDER MONT4 GOMERY GI BILL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 3014A 

6 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking 

7 paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph 

8 (1): 

9 ‘‘(1) enrolled in— 

10 ‘‘(A) an approved program of education 

11 that leads to employment in a high technology 

12 occupation in a high technology industry (as de13 termined pursuant to regulations prescribed by 

14 the Secretary); or 

15 ‘‘(B) during the period beginning on Octo16 ber 1, 2007, and ending on September 30, 

17 2011, an approved program of education lasting 

18 less than two years that (as so determined) 

19 leads to employment in— 

20 ‘‘(i) the transportation sector of the 

21 economy; 

22 ‘‘(ii) the construction sector of the 

23 economy; 

24 ‘‘(iii) the hospitality sector of the 

25 economy; or 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•S 526 IS

1 ‘‘(iv) the energy sector of the econ2 omy; and’’. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

4 (1) HEADING AMENDMENT.—The heading of 

5 such section is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘§ 3014A. Accelerated payment of basic educational 

7 assistance’’. 

8 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating 

9 to such section in the table of sections at the begin10 ning of chapter 30 of such title is amended to read 

11 as follows: 

‘‘3014A. Accelerated payment of basic educational assistance.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS