alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-3215-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Arkansas (FEMA-3215-EM), dated September 2, 2005, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 3, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Carlos Mitchell, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared emergency. 

This action terminates my appointment of Gary Jones as Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05-18002 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 477/2014Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 477/2014 of 12 May 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive            measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 477/2014                     

# of 12 May 2014

# implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening                        the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions                           undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine(1), and in particular Article 14(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 17 March 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

(2)In view of the gravity of the situation, the Council considers that additional persons and entities should be added to the                              list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures as set out in Annex I to Regulation                              (EU) No 269/2014.

(3)Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# [X1Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 is amended as follows:                   

the heading ‘Persons’ is inserted after the existing heading ‘List of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Article 2’;                            

after the existing list of persons, the heading of a new section entitled ‘Entities’ is inserted;                            

the persons and entities listed in the Annex to this Regulation shall be added to the relevant section of Annex I to Regulation                                 (EU) No 269/2014.]                            

Editorial Information

X1Substituted by Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 477/2014 of 12 May 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning                                 restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence                                 of Ukraine (Official Journal of the European Union L 137 of 12 May 2014).

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

## ANNEXU.K.**List of persons and entities referred to in Article 1**

### Entities:

1

OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53409-53410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17808]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 284]


Delegation of Authority to the Under Secretary for Political 
Affairs

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including the authority of section 1 of the State

[[Page 53410]]

Department Basic Authorities Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I 
hereby delegate to the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, to the 
extent authorized by law, all authorities and functions vested in the 
Secretary of State or the head of agency by any act, order, 
determination, delegation of authority, regulation, or executive order, 
now or hereafter issued. This delegation includes all authorities and 
functions that have been or may be delegated or redelegated to other 
Department officials but does not repeal delegations to such officials.
    This delegation shall apply when both the Secretary of State and 
the Deputy Secretary of State are absent or otherwise unavailable or 
when either the Secretary or the Deputy requests that the Under 
Secretary exercise such authorities and functions.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary of 
State and the Deputy Secretary of State may exercise any function or 
authority delegated by this delegation.
    This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 26, 2005.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-17808 Filed 9-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Active Power, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John K. Penver, Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 29, 2008



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    JOHN K.
PENVER                                                          
|John K. Penver Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
# C_2023127EN.01002101.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 31 January 2023 — Budapest Főváros IV. Kerület Újpest Önkormányzat Polgármesteri Hivatala v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság

(Case C-46/23, Újpesti Polgármesteri Hivatal)

(2023/C 127/25)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Budapest Főváros IV. Kerület Újpest Önkormányzat Polgármesteri Hivatala

Defendant: Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 58(2), in particular subparagraphs (c), (d) and (g), of the General Data Protection Regulation (1) (‘GDPR’) be interpreted as meaning that the national supervisory authority, in exercise of its corrective powers, may order the data controller or processor to erase unlawfully processed personal data even in the absence of an express request by the data subject under Article 17(1) of the GDPR? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 58(2), in particular subparagraphs (c), (d) and (g), of the General Data Protection Regulation (1) (‘GDPR’) be interpreted as meaning that the national supervisory authority, in exercise of its corrective powers, may order the data controller or processor to erase unlawfully processed personal data even in the absence of an express request by the data subject under Article 17(1) of the GDPR?

| 2. | In the event that the answer to the first question is that the supervisory authority may order the data controller or processor to erase unlawfully processed personal data even in the absence of a request by the data subject, is that so irrespective of whether or not the personal data were obtained from the data subject? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event that the answer to the first question is that the supervisory authority may order the data controller or processor to erase unlawfully processed personal data even in the absence of a request by the data subject, is that so irrespective of whether or not the personal data were obtained from the data subject?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).

---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 11, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ Nos. 3D20-776 and 3D20-955 Lower Tribunal No. 18-14270

________________ 

### James Celestin , Appellant,
vs. 

### First Home Realty and Investment Corporation, et al. , Appellees. Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Barbara Areces, Judge. Law Offices of James Jean-Francois, P.A., and James Jean-Francois (Hollywood), for appellant. Wasson & Associates, Chartered, and Annabel C. Majewski; and Jeffrey Greenhaus, for appellee Dario Desrouleaux. Before LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
1 The Honorable Donald E. O’Brien, Un ited States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2554

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Fray Moreno-Ramirez, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 5, 2009 Filed: October 23, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Fray Moreno-Ramirez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) and 846, and two counts of distribution of 50 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture, in violati on of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B). The district court 1 sentenced him to the statutory minimum of 120 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. His counselhas filed a brief under Anders v. California ,-2- 386 U.S. 738 (1967), seeking permission to withdraw and arguing that the sentence is unreasonable.

We conclude that Moreno-Ramirez’s sentence is not unreasonable. SeeUnited States v. Wadena , 470 F.3d 735, 737 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review); United States v. Chacon , 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir. 2003) (onl y authority for district court to depart from statutory minimum sentence is found in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) and (f), which apply only when government make s motion for substantial assistance or defendant qualifies for safety-v alve relief). After review ing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant c ounsel’s motion to withdraw on condition that counsel inform Moreno-Ramirez about the procedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for certiorari.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo
F. Wells, III, Principal Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Principal Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the
Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Leo F. Wells, III      
|Leo F. Wells, III          
|Principal Executive Officer
|August 8, 2007             



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Douglas P. Williams    
|Douglas P. Williams        
|Principal Financial Officer
|August 8, 2007
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**






We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
      Statement No.333-42839 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-39003,
      333-39007, 333-79557, 333-67610, 333-91956, 333-121141 on Form S-8 of our
      reports dated March 20, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial
      statement schedules of Intermec, Inc. and management's report on the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of Intermec, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
      2006.






Seattle,
      Washington




/s/
      Deloitte & Touche, LLP.


March
      20,
      2007
# C_2023179EN.01005101.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/51

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 March 2023 — Enmacc v Commission

(Case T-1/23 R)

(Interim relief - Public supply contracts - Services for the organisation of demand aggregation and tendering of gas under the EU Energy Platform - Application for interim measures - Weighing of interests)

(2023/C 179/75)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Enmacc GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. von Bonin, A. Pliego Selie and T. van Helfteren, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà, S. Romoli, G. Gattinara and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, suspension of the operation of the European Commission decision of 12 December 2022 to initiate or continue the negotiated procurement procedure ENER/2022/NP/0041 without prior publication of a contract notice and without having invited the applicant to participate; in the alternative, suspension of the award of the contract in relation to the procurement procedure at issue and, in the further alternative, suspension of the signature of the contract in relation to that procedure.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
DEASON v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, et al.

No. 440P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2008.

James A. Barnes, IV, Birmingham, AL, for Owens-Illinois, et al.

Fred D. Poisson, Jr., Wadesboro, for Deason.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of September 2008 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of September 2008."
# FILED
May 25, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON EUGENE KERRENT, ) ) Petitioner, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9809-CC-00288 ) vs. ) MADISON COUNTY ) STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) No. C97-200 ) Respondent. )

O R D E R
This matter is before the Court upon the state’s mo tion, pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Crimi nal Appeals, to affirm the trial c ourt judgment by order rather than formal opinion. This case represents an appeal from the d ismissal of the petitioner’s third petit ion for post-conviction relief. In 1988, the petitioner was convicted of aggravated kidnapping and being an habitual offender. The petitioner was sentenced to life imprisonment. The pet itioner subsequently filed a petition for postconviction relief attack

ing these convictions , as well as a petiti on attacking the underlying convictions used to establish his habitual offender status. The trial court denied both petitions and this C ourt affirmed the denials on appeal. See Eugene Kerrent v. State , No. 02C01-9103-CC-00047 ( Tenn. Crim. App., Oct. 9, 1991); Eugene Kerrent v. State , No. 02C01-9412-CC-00275 (Tenn. Crim. App. Apr. 4, 1995).

On May 30, 1997, the petition er filed the present petition forpostconviction relief. The petitioner raises the issue of ineff ective assistance of counsel, which is the same issue he raised in his two previous petitions. F inding that the petitioner had previousl y filed two petitions for post-conviction rel ief and that the present petition is time barred, th e trial court dismissed the petition.
T.C.A. § 40-30-202(c) prov ides that no more than one petition for postconviction relief may be filed attacking a sing le judgment, and mandates that the tr ial court shall summarily

dismiss any second or s ubsequent petition if a prior petition was2

filed and resolved on the meri ts by a court of competent jur isdiction. Since the petitioner previously

filed at least one petition that was resolved on the mer its by the trial court and by this Court on appeal, the petitioner's present petition was properly dismissed. Additionally , after reviewing the entire record on appeal, w e find that the petitioner’s claim does not fall within one of the limit ed circumstances under w hich a prior petition may be r

e-opened. See T.C.A. § 40-30-217.
Accordingly, w

e conclude that the trial cou rt did not err in dismis sing the petitioner’s petition for pos t-conviction relie

f. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordan ce with Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. It appear ing the petitioner is i ndigent, costs of this appeal shall be taxed to the state.

__________________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDG E

__________________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

__________________________________ JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE
HAYWOOD COUNCIL ON AGING v. MATHIS.

No. COA07-554.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Haywood (06CVS1105).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded. Dismissed as to Employees appeal.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53266-53267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17805]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5183]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Memling's Portraits''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Memling's Portraits,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Frick Collection, 
New York, NY from on or about October 12, 2005 to on or about December 
31, 2005, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered 
to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B.

[[Page 53267]]

Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of 
State, (telephone: (202) 453-8048). The address is Department of State, 
SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: August 31, 2005.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-17805 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P