alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Matthew Patrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Matthew G. Patrick

Matthew G. Patrick
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2003
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3963

_____________________________ S HON G LYNN M ILLS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. W. Joel Boles , Judge

. May 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Shon Glynn Mills, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 971/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 971/2014 of 12 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 971/2014                     

# of 12 September 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 September 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 956/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 956/2014 of 9 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 956/2014                     

# of 9 September 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 September 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Annual Report of Market Central, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford A. Clark, VP
of Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Clifford A. Clark
-----------------------------
Clifford A. Clark
VP of Finance
December 13, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DWIGHT C. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. RICHARD DANZIG, United States Secretary of the Navy, No. 99-1652 Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-98-1466-AM) Submitted: August 24, 1999 Decided: September 20, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Dwight C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Dwight C. Brown appeals the order of the district court entering judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Navy and denying Brown's employment discrimination claim filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e - 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). Finding no error, we affirm. Brown first claims that the district court erred in denying his claim of retaliatory discharge. We find no error because the evidence clearly established that Brown's termination was based on his numerous unauthorized absences, and not because of any protected activity. See Carter v. Ball , 33 F.3d 450, 460 (4th Cir. 1994). Brown next claims error in the district court's refusal to considerhis claims of race and gender based discrimination. In order for a federal employee to proceed on a claim of discrimination under Title VII, he must first exhaust his administrative remedies. See Young v. National Ctr. for Health Servs. Research , 828 F.2d 235, 237 (4th Cir. 1987). Brown was required to file a formal complaint within fifteen days of his final counseling session with his EEO counselor. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107 (1999). It is uncontradicted that he failed to do so. Because Brown has failed to administratively exhaust his claims of gender or race discrimination below, he is barred from litigating those matters in the federal courts. We accordingly affirm the order of the district court. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   5
       
<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                        269,319
<SECURITIES>                                                  11,830,903
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 863,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              12,963,329
<PP&E>                                                        1,385,242
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (647,625)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                13,700,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         6,039,948
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                      136
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    7,660,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  13,700,946
<SALES>                                                       15,808,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              15,808,398
<CGS>                                                         11,418,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 11,418,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              1,872,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            190,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               2,327,599
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  1,038,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  1,288,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.85
        

</TABLE>
vvus_EX 10-1


		
			Exhibit 10.1
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			June 30, 2016
		

		
			 
		

		
			Via email:
		

		
			 
		

		
			John Slebir
		

		
			General Counsel
		

		
			VIVUS, Inc.
		

		
			351 E. Evelyn Ave.
		

		
			Mountain View, CA 94041
		

		
			 
		

		
			Re:Termination Notice
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dear Mr. Slebir:
		

		
			 
		

		
			This is to confirm our understanding that the date of the termination of the License and Commercialization Agreement between Vivus, Inc. and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Endo international company, dated October 10, 2013 (the “License Agreement”), is hereby extended to August 31, 2016.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Sincerely,
		

		
			 
		

		
			AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.ENDO VENTURES LIMITED
		

		
			 
		

		
			/s/ Deanna Voss/s/ Robert Cobuzzi
		

		
			Deanna VossRobert Cobuzzi
		

		
			Assistant SecretaryDirector
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Accepted and agreed:
		

		
			 
		

		
			VIVUS, INC.
		

		
			 
		

		
			/s/ Mark Oki
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          33,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,957
<PP&E>                                          63,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,663
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,093
<SALES>                                        160,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,604
<CGS>                                           95,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,282
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,342)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (523)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                                                                                                                                           |   |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  August 11, 2011 |   /s/ David K. Young                                                                                                                      |   |
|                             | David K. Young                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                             | President, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |   |

----

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

SONNY GARCIA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D13-6251 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed December 3, 2014. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; 

Edward J. Volz, Jr., Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Gillian N. Leytham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

MORRIS, Judge. 

 Sonny Garcia appeals the revocation of his sex offender probation for the 

offense of possession of child pornography and his resulting sentence of forty-eight 

months in prison. We affirm the revocation of his probation because there was 

competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding that Garcia 
-2- 

"intentional[ly] disregard[ed] . . . the GPS monitoring rules," constituting a willful and 

substantial violation of probation. Correa v. State, 43 So. 3d 738, 745 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2010) (noting that "noncompliance with the rules [that] results from equipment problems 

or the subject's unintentional failure to operate the equipment properly . . . does not rise 

to the level of a willful and substantial violation of probation" but that "intentional 

disregard of the GPS monitoring rules, tampering with the equipment, or actual 

violations of curfew or other activity restrictions will generally amount to willful and 

substantial violations"); see also State v. Carter, 835 So. 2d 259, 262 (Fla. 2002) ("The 

trial court is in a better position to identify the probation violator's motive, intent, and 

attitude and assess whether the violation is both willful and substantial."). 

 Affirmed. 

DAVIS, C.J., and LaROSE, J., Concur.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
INTERDIGITAL, INC.


Compensation Program for Non-Management Directors


	
		
	Base Annual Board Retainer:
	$40,000

	Chairman of the Board:
	$50,000

	Audit Committee Chair:
	$30,000

	Compensation Committee Chair:
	$20,000

	Investment Committee Chair:
	$15,000

	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair:
	$15,000

	Audit Committee Members:
	$12,000

	Compensation Committee Members:
	$10,000

	Investment Committee Members:
	$7,500

	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Members:
	$7,500

	Initial Election RSU Award:
	$150,000 of RSUs (vesting in full one year from grant date)

	Annual RSU Award:
	$150,000 of RSUs (vesting in full one year from grant date)






		
	•
	All cash payments and RSU grants shall be based on service for a full year; pro rata payments and grants shall be made for service of less than one year.  Cash payments shall be made on a quarterly basis.




		
	•
	This program is designed to compensate each non-management director for participating in up to eight (8) Board meetings per year and up to eight (8) meetings per year for each Committee on which the non-management director serves.  Additional compensation will be paid to each non-management director for participating in meetings in excess of these thresholds, as follows:




		
	◦
	Each additional Board meeting:        $4,000


		
	◦
	Each additional Committee meeting:        $1,000




		
	•
	In addition, non-management directors will be paid a per diem fee of $1,000 for attendance at or participation in events, conferences or meetings, in their capacity as a director, at the request of InterDigital, Inc. senior management, provided that such attendance or participation requires a significant time commitment and would be considered outside of the director’s typical Board and/or Committee duties.  Any per diem fee payments will be subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.




		
	•
	Both cash payments and RSUs may be deferred.  An election to defer must be made in the calendar year preceding the year in which services are rendered and the compensation is earned (i.e., elections to defer must be made by December 31 of each year for the deferral to apply to the next year’s cash payments and/or RSU award(s)).




		
	•
	Each initial election RSU award shall be granted on the date of the director’s initial election to the Board.  Annual RSU awards shall be granted on the date of each Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  





















		
	•
	The number of RSUs to be granted pursuant to each initial election award and annual award shall be calculated as follows:




$150,000 / (the 30-day historical average) = number of RSUs to be granted


		
	•
	The terms of this program shall be periodically reviewed by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.






June 2016