alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Janell Wylma McMickle BRYANT, Employee v. TAYLOR KING FURNITURE, Employer Wausau Insurance Companies, Carrier.

No. 167PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Randy D. Duncan, for Bryant.

*744Jennifer L. Gauger, Charlotte, for Furniture, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th day of April 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."

Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 05-21]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (702) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 05-21 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: August 23, 2005.

Jeannette Owings-Ballard,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 51024)          ( print page 51025)          ( print page 51026)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 05-17090 Filed 8-26-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
STATE of North Carolina v. Kevin Nicholas BROWER.

No. 550P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Brower.

Danielle Marquis Elder, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 651 S.E.2d 390.

*743*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 15th day of November 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference,' this the 10th day of April 2008."
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Stratus      Services Group, Inc.**

| 1. | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                February 3, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Joseph J. Raymond                 |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   | Joseph                J. Raymond                     |
|                                   |   | Chairman                of the Board of Directors,   |
|                                   |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1073/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1073/2014 of 9 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for common sole in VIIIa and            VIIIb by vessels flying the flag of Belgium         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1073/2014                     

# of 9 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for common sole in VIIIa and VIIIb by vessels flying the flag of Belgium

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
# CE2004065EN.01006602.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/66

---

(2004/C 65 E/073)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1217/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(2 April 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds under the Framework for action on sustainable urban development in the European Union by the municipality of Pesaro

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Pesaro, urgently need to use European funds to promote sustainable urban development,

can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Pesaro has submitted projects for the Framework for action on sustainable urban development in the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Pesaro has submitted projects for the Framework for action on sustainable urban development in the European Union?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Pesaro has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Pesaro has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---
STATE v. MOORE.

No. COA07-1184.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CRS200143, 05CRS200144, 05CRS200146, 05CRS200147, 05CRS200148).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States; Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence will hold a one-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

# DATES:

November 14, 2005.

# TIME:

8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, Judicial Conference Center, One Columbus Circle, NE., Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: September 2, 2005.

John K. Rabiej,

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 05-18065 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
# Council Decision 2014/821/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/821/CFSP of 4 November 2014 concerning the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European            Union and Ukraine on the status of the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/821/CFSP                     

# of 4 November 2014

# concerning the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the status of the European                        Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine)                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 37 thereof, in conjunction with Article 218(5) and                           (6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/486/CFSP(1).

(2)On the same day, the Council adopted the Decision authorising the opening of negotiations with Ukraine in order to conclude                              an Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the status of the European Union Common Security and Defence Policy                              (CSDP) mission in Ukraine.

(3)An agreement on the status of European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (‘the                              Agreement’) has been negotiated between the Union and Ukraine.

(4)The Agreement should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the status of the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security                     Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.                  

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind                     the Union.                  

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 4 November 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

Council Decision 2014/486/CFSP of 22 July 2014 on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform                              Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 42).
**Compensation
      Amendment**








It
      is
      further understood and agreed that the undersigned herein; Mr. Guy Pipolo,
      whom
      has been retained to serve as the Chief Operating Officer shall be entitled
      to
      an annual equity assignment in connection with his services to, and on behalf
      of
      the Company. It is further understood that Mr. Pipolo will be compensated on
      a
      per annum basis pursuant to the attached schedule articulated herein referred
      to
      as “Schedule A”.





Such
      compensation shall be issued on the anniversary date of the employment agreement
      as adopted by the company and shall continue as long as Mr. Pipolo is employed
      with the Company. Further, such compensation shall be reviewed and revised
      in a
      manner consistent with the employment agreement to mitigate any increases in
      responsibility as inured.





“Schedule
      A”





Stock
            
            Warrants
                (*)1,500,000
                Common Shares
            
            3,000,000
                Common Warrants










Agreed:
            
            Agreed:Clickable
                Oil
            
            Mr.
                Guy PipoloDated:
            
            Dated:
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 319/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 319/2014 of 27 March 2014 on the fees and charges levied by the European Aviation Safety Agency,            and repealing Regulation (EC) No 593/2007 (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 319/2014                     

# of 27 March 2014

# on the fees and charges levied by the European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 593/2007

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2153 of 16 December 2019 on the fees and charges levied by the European Union                                 Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 319/2014.
# CE2004065EN.01002601.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/26

---

(2004/C 65 E/026)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0411/03

by Eija-Riitta Korhola (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(17 February 2003)

Subject:   Carriage of oil in sensitive sea areas

Subject:

In the Baltic there are several areas such as the Gulf of Finland, the Danish sounds, or the Aland Islands where the natural environment is particularly vulnerable to the risks posed by shipping. It is presumably the case that in the North Sea, on the Atlantic coasts, and in the Mediterranean there are also easily identifiable areas of a similar kind, where it might be necessary to restrict the carriage of dangerous substances by sea in order to avert risks.

Is the Commission willing to consider designating Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas in EU territorial waters so as to ensure that the carriage of dangerous substances by sea through those areas can be restricted where necessary (for instance as dictated by weather and other conditions)?

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #10134]

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration

# ACTION:

Amendment 1. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for public assistance only for the State of Maine (FEMA-1591-DR), dated 06/29/2005.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Snow Melt, and Ice Jams.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/29/2005 through 05/03/2005.                    

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

08/10/2005.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/29/2005.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Maine, dated 06/29/2005, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties:

Aroostook

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008.)

Becky C. Brantley,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 05-17586 Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 951/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 951/2014 of 4 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 951/2014                     

# of 4 September 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 September 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE of North Carolina v. Bernard Romel LITTLE.

No. 407P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 11, 2008.

Ryan McKaig, for Little.

Sarah Y. Meacham, Assistant Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 664 S.E.2d 432.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of September 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."