alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 531 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 967
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 531

                          [Report No. 110-462]

  To repeal section 10(f) of Public Law 93-531, commonly known as the 
                          ``Bennett Freeze''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 8, 2007

  Mr. McCain introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

                           September 15, 2008

               Reported by Mr. Dorgan, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal section 10(f) of Public Law 93-531, commonly known as the 
                          ``Bennett Freeze''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF THE BENNETT FREEZE.

    Section 10(f) of Public Law 93-531 (25 U.S.C. 640d-9(f)) is 
repealed.
                                                       Calendar No. 967

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 531

                          [Report No. 110-462]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To repeal section 10(f) of Public Law 93-531, commonly known as the 
                          ``Bennett Freeze''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 15, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          21,337
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                       505
<INVENTORY>                                     55,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,720
<PP&E>                                          82,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 891,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,044
<BONDS>                                        577,129
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       224,291
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   891,267
<SALES>                                        371,346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               371,346
<CGS>                                          309,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   503
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,596
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,596
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,596
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.**

**Certification of Scott H. Rechler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director**

**of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the sole general partner of the Registrant**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

I, Scott H. Rechler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Office and Director of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the sole general partner of Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|   | 1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                               |   |     |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------|
| Dated:                May 15, 2006 |   | By  | /s/ Scott H. Rechler |
|                               |   |     |  

 

 

Scott H. Rechler,

 

 

 

Chairman of the Board, ChiefExecutive Officer and Director of RecksonAssociates Realty Corp., the sole generalpartner of the Registrant

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

  |
# Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/2359Show full title

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/2359 of 16 December 2015 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive            measures against Syria         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/2359                     

# of 16 December 2015

# implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria(1), and in particular Article 30(1) thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)On 31 May 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

(2)One person and two entities should no longer be kept on the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies subject                              to restrictive measures set out in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

(3)Decision 2013/255/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2015.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Dieschbourg                            

## ANNEXU.K.

The person and two entities listed below, as well as their related entries, are hereby deleted from the list set out in Annex                     I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP:                  

### A.PersonsU.K.

No 205. Samir Hamsho

### B.EntitiesU.K.

No 68. Syria Steel SA

No 69. Al Buroj Trading

1

OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 21, 2009 

0114 

Order 

 

January 21, 2009 

137606 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137606 

 COA: 277549 

Washtenaw CC: 06-001194-FC 

JOSHUA JOSEPH TACKETT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 9, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3681 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3681


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 9, 2008

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Joseph A. 
                      Ryan Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSEPH A. RYAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Joseph A. Ryan Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph A. 
Ryan Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate November 20, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
# CE2004065EN.01006902.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/69

---

(2004/C 65 E/079)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1223/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(2 April 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds under the Framework for action on sustainable urban development in the European Union by the municipality of Fiumicino

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Fiumicino, urgently need to use European funds to promote sustainable urban development,

can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Fiumicino has submitted projects for the Framework for action on sustainable urban development in the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Fiumicino has submitted projects for the Framework for action on sustainable urban development in the European Union?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Fiumicino has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Fiumicino has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---
EXHIBIT 10.1

                   APPENDIX C: EXECUTIVE CASH COMPONENT PLAN

                                I. PLAN DESIGN

A.          RELATIONSHIP  TO  THE CLUBCORP PLAN.  This ClubCorp Executive Cash
Component  Plan for 1996 (the "Executive Cash Plan") is a part of and governed
by  the  terms  and  conditions  of  the  ClubCorp  Plan.  All terms which are
initially  capitalized  in  the Executive Cash Plan and are not defined in the
Executive  Cash  Plan,  have  the  same  meaning  as  the terms defined in the
ClubCorp  Plan.

B.        GENERAL PLAN DESCRIPTION.  Total Potential  Compensation targets are
established  for  the  Executive positions by evaluating the responsibilities,
complexity  and  impact  of  each  job, internal equity and market competitive
information.    Specific  financial  targets are established as the measure of
financial  performance.   Qualitative performance is based on the results of a
documented  performance  appraisal.    Total  Earned  Variable compensation is
distributed  to  Participants  in  the  form  of Cash Awards and Stock Awards.

C.          ELIGIBILITY.  All individuals who have been designated as eligible
individuals  under  the  Executive  Stock  Option  Plan  of  Club  Corporation
International,  to  the  extent designated as Participants pursuant to Section
3.1  of  the  ClubCorp  Plan,  shall  participate  in the Executive Cash Plan,
subject  to  the  terms  and  conditions  of the ClubCorp Plan, other than the
eligibility  requirements.

                        II. COMPONENTS OF COMPENSATION

A.      TOTAL POTENTIAL COMPENSATION consists of two components, the Fixed and
Variable  Compensation.

B.      TOTAL EARNED VARIABLE equals the amount earned based on achievement of
the  financial  targets  plus  the  amount  earned  based  on  the  individual
performance  rating.

C.          OVERACHIEVEMENT  is  capped  at  120%  for  the financial measure.

D.       MINIMUM TARGETS for both the financial and individual targets must be
achieved  to  qualify  for  any  payout.

                               III. DISTRIBUTION

The  "Fixed" is paid in cash, each payroll period.  Total Earned Variable will
be  paid  as  a  Cash  Award and as a Stock Award to the extent elected by the
Participant  prior to the Award Date in accordance with procedures established
by  the Compensation Committee.  The percentage of Total Earned Variable to be
paid  in  Restricted  Stock  will be elected annually by the Participant.  The
elected  percentage  can  be  0%  to  100%,  in  10%  increments.
J.

sentencing range for attempted lewdness since 1997 is 2 to 20 years in prison, see 1997 Nev. Stat., ch. 455, §5, at 1722; 1997 Nev. Stat., ch. 314, § 2, at 1178, and appellant stipulated to the 8-to-20-year sentence in his guilty plea agreement. To the extent that he challenged the validity of his guilty plea, such a challenge is outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Edwards, 112 Nev. at 708, 918 P.2d at 324. Therefore, without considering the merits of that claim, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.


# aft.oz, Hardesty

cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge Frederick Vonseydewitz Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1941A 400
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2014Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2014 of 23 June 2014 implementing Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011            concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2014                     

# of 23 June 2014

# implementing Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 of 2 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation                           in Libya(1), and in particular Article 16(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 2 March 2011, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 204/2011.

(2)In accordance with Article 16(6) of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011, the Council has carried out a review of the list set out                              in Annex III to that Regulation.

(3)The identifying information in relation to one entity on the list set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 should                              be updated.

(4)There are no longer grounds for keeping two entities on the list set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011.

(5)Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 shall be amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 23 June 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 is hereby amended as follows:

the entry for the entity ’Capitana Seas Limited’ is replaced by the following entry:

the entries for the following entities are deleted:
                -  Libyan Holding Company for Development and Investment, 
                -  Dalia Advisory Limited (LIA sub). 

1

OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 1.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00758-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.A.D.K. and J.B.L.E., Children

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-10-0616-CVW

Honorable Melissa Uram-Degerolami, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs shall be assessed against appellant in relation to this 

appeal.

SIGNED April 20, 2016.

_____________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
# CE2004084EN.01070901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/709 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/709

---

(2004/C 84 E/0796)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3868/02

by Ria Oomen-Ruijten (PPE-DE) and Bartho Pronk (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(10 January 2003)

Subject:   Netherlands Student Grants Act

Subject:

In the Netherlands, grants are awarded to students aged over 18. That applies to all forms of education. Child benefit is not paid in respect of students aged over 18.

If the students concerned pursue their studies in Belgium or Germany, student grants are awarded in respect of higher education and university courses but not in respect of secondary, basic or intermediate vocational training courses.

The Netherlands authorities recognise periods of study in Belgium and Germany in connection with the Compulsory Education Act, and degrees taken in Germany and Belgium are recognised as full degrees.

| 1. | Does the Commission feel that the Netherlands' decision not to award grants to students over the age of 18 following secondary (vocational) training courses in Belgium and Germany is in breach of the principle of ‘free movement of services’ (following a recognised training course abroad) and/or the ‘free movement of persons’? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the Commission feel that the Netherlands' decision not to award grants to students over the age of 18 following secondary (vocational) training courses in Belgium and Germany is in breach of the principle of ‘free movement of services’ (following a recognised training course abroad) and/or the ‘free movement of persons’?

| 2. | Does the Commission feel that the Netherlands' decision not to award grants to students over the age of 18 following secondary (vocational) training courses in Belgium and Germany is in breach of Articles 149 and/or 150 of the EC Treaty in that the action of the Netherlands Government restricts student mobility? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the Commission feel that the Netherlands' decision not to award grants to students over the age of 18 following secondary (vocational) training courses in Belgium and Germany is in breach of Articles 149 and/or 150 of the EC Treaty in that the action of the Netherlands Government restricts student mobility?

---
Letter Agreement Regarding Sublease



  
 Exhibit 10.44

  

			
		  	




		  
		  
		  
		  
		  
	 October 10, 2007
	  

 Mr. David Foster 

Chief Financial Officer 
 diaDexus, Inc. 
 343 Oyster Point Boulevard 

South San Francisco, CA 94080 
 Dear David, 
 Regarding our sublease from DiaDexus, in addition to the provisions
of the Fourth Amendment to Sublease that we are discussing, we have agreed that upon execution of that amendment, Monogram will reimburse DiaDexus as follows: 
  

	 	 1.
	 Lobby: 20% of the salary and benefits of diaDexus’s receptionist who will staff the lobby, provide visitor greeting, and provide general
receptionist support. 


  

	 	 2.
	 Maintenance costs: 50% of normal maintenance expenses incurred by diaDexus in respect of the entire building, including the Sublease Premises



  

									
	 diaDexus, Inc.
	 		 	 Monogram Biosciences, Inc.

					
	 By:
	 	 /s/ David Foster
	 		 	 By:
	 	 /s/ A. G. Merriweather

					
	 Title:
	 	 EVP & CFO
	 		 	 Title:
	 	 CFO

					
	 Date:
	 	 10-12-07
	 		 	 Date:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Active Power, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John K. Penver, Vice President
of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 4, 2010



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    JOHN K.
PENVER                                                         
|John K. Penver Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officerand Secretary