alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-88339) pertaining to the Williams Communications Group, Inc. 1999
Stock Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-51472) and related
Prospectus of Williams Communications Group, Inc. for the registration of
5,000,000 shares of 6.75% redeemable cumulative convertible preferred stock and
11,605,000 shares of Class A common stock, and Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-53696) for the registration of common stock, preferred stock, depositary
shares, debt securities, warrants, stock purchase contracts and stock purchase
units and subscription rights, of our report dated February 28, 2001, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Williams
Communications Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                  Ernst & Young LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
March 12, 2001
STATE v. Jose Jesus Garcia LOPEZ.

No. 95PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 10, 2008.

Nora Henry Hargrove, for Lopez.

Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of November 2008 by State of NC for extension of time to file brief:

"Motion Allowed. State of NC shall have up to and including the 10th day of December 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of November 2008."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 174 (Friday, September 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17848]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. 
Congaree Downs Limited Partnership, et al., Case No. 3:05-cv-02505, was 
lodged with the United States District Court for the District of South 
Carolina on August 30, 2005. This proposed Consent Decree concerns a 
complaint filed by the United States against the Defendants pursuant to 
Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act (``CWA''), 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), to 
obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the 
Defendants for filling wetlands without a permit.
    The proposed Consent Decree requires the defendants to pay a civil 
penalty and restore the impacted wetland to its natural grade contour. 
The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this 
proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Please address comments to Emery Clark, 
Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, 
Wachovia Building, Suite 500, 1441 Main Street, Columbia, South 
Carolina 29201 and refer to United States v. Congaree Downs Limited 
Partnership, et al., Case No. 3:05-cv-02505.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, 901 
Richland Lane, Columbia, South Carolina.
    In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed on the World 
Wide Web at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html.

Stephen Samuels,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 05-17848 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.7
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
To the Directors of Fina Plc:
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
PetroFina S.A. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-61145) of our report dated April 14,
1997, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of PetroFina S.A. for the year
ended December 31, 1998, relating to the balance sheet of Fina Plc as of
December 31, 1996 and the related statements of profit and loss and cash flows
for the year then ended.
 
/s/ KPMG Audit Plc
 
KPMG Audit Plc
Chartered Accountants
Registered Auditor
London, England
April 27, 1999
IN RE I.P.

No. COA07-1430.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Gaston (07JB154).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-3-1998              JAN-3-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-4-1997              JUL-4-1997
<CASH>                                               0                   25496
<SECURITIES>                                         0                    5109
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                    7246
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                    1054
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                   41711
<PP&E>                                               0                  843386
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                  188487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  728773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   74158
<BONDS>                                              0                  390000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                      63
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  728773
<SALES>                                          76219                  146761
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 76349                  147250
<CGS>                                            28502                   55359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    60074                  116842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10168                   19886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1729                    2979
<INCOME-TAX>                                        86                     149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1643                    2830
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1643                    2830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26                     .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26                     .45
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Pinnacle Resources, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
report on Form 10-K for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ Robert A. Hildebrand
                                  ------------------------
                                  Robert A. Hildebrand
                                  Chief Financial Officer

January 20, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                           2,089
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,368
<INVENTORY>                                     33,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,429
<PP&E>                                          68,607
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,773
<BONDS>                                         52,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,365
<SALES>                                         36,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,009
<CGS>                                           25,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,197
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (835)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,485)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,485)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
STATE v. BALLARD.

No. COA07-860.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from McDowell (05CRS50583, 05CRS50587, 06CRS2677).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17901]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Wednesday, September 21, 2005.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Derivatives Clearing Organization Review.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-17901 Filed 9-6-05; 11:08 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 440 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 440

   To designate the National Museum of Wildlife Art, located at 2820 
 Rungius Road, Jackson, Wyoming, as the ``National Museum of Wildlife 
                      Art of the United States''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2007

 Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Thomas) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the National Museum of Wildlife Art, located at 2820 
 Rungius Road, Jackson, Wyoming, as the ``National Museum of Wildlife 
                      Art of the United States''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) Designation.--The National Museum of Wildlife Art, located at 
2820 Rungius Road, Jackson, Wyoming, shall be known and designated as 
the ``National Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the museum referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``National 
Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2023338EN.01000501.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht Regensburg (Germany) lodged on 20 April 2023 — European Chemicals Agency v Hallertauer Hopfenveredelungsges. m.b.H.

(Case C-256/23, ECHA)

(2023/C 338/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht Regensburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: European Chemicals Agency

Defendant: Hallertauer Hopfenveredelungsges. m.b.H.

Intervening party: Regierung von Niederbayern (Government of Lower Bavaria) as a representative of the public interest

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 94(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, (1) according to which an action may be brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union against a decision of the agency, to be interpreted as meaning that the enforceability of decisions of the agency may also be the subject of an action? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 94(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, (1) according to which an action may be brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union against a decision of the agency, to be interpreted as meaning that the enforceability of decisions of the agency may also be the subject of an action?

| 2. | If the first question is to be answered in the negative: Is the first paragraph of Article 299 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that it applies not only to acts adopted by the Council, the Commission or the European Central Bank, but also to decisions of the European Chemicals Agency imposing an administrative charge? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is to be answered in the negative: Is the first paragraph of Article 299 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that it applies not only to acts adopted by the Council, the Commission or the European Central Bank, but also to decisions of the European Chemicals Agency imposing an administrative charge?

| 3. | If the second question is to be answered in the affirmative: Is the second paragraph of Article 299 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that the reference to the Member State’s rules of civil procedure encompasses not only the rules of procedure but also the rules governing jurisdiction? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the second question is to be answered in the affirmative: Is the second paragraph of Article 299 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that the reference to the Member State’s rules of civil procedure encompasses not only the rules of procedure but also the rules governing jurisdiction?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1).

---
csgs-ex1025ca_203.htm



Pages where confidential treatment has been requested are stamped “Confidential Treatment Requested and the Redacted Material has been separately filed with the Commission,” and places where information has been redacted have been marked with (***). 

Exhibit 10.25CA

 

EIGHTY-SIXTH AMENDMENT

TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CSG MASTER SUBSCRIBER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

csg SYSTEMS, INC.

AND

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC

 

 

 

This EIGHTY-sixTH AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) is made by and between CSG Systems, Inc. (“CSG”) and Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC (“Customer”).  The effective date of this Amendment is the date last signed below (the "Effective Date").  CSG and Customer entered into that certain Amended and Restated CSG Master Subscriber Management System Agreement (CSG document no. 2298875) dated February 9, 2009, as amended (the “Agreement”), and now desire to further amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.  If the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment shall be in conflict with the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control.  Any terms in initial capital letters or all capital letters used as a defined term but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.  Upon execution of this Amendment by the Parties, any subsequent reference to the Agreement between the Parties shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.  Except as amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect according to their terms. 

 

1.  Effective as of June 1, 2016, and pursuant to notice timely provided by Customer and received by CSG, Customer desires to decrease and CSG agrees to decrease the number of Web Enabled Advanced Customer Service Representative® (Web Enabled ACSR®) licenses from *** ******** ************ (*****) to **** ******* (***) pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement.  As a result, for the fees set forth in Schedule F to the Agreement, the number of Customer’s Web Enabled ACSR® licenses shall decrease such that the total of Customer’s Web Enabled ACSR® licenses is **** ******* (***).  For purposes of clarification, such decrease will include the *********** (**) Web Enabled ACSR® licenses previously provided ** ** **** to Customer pursuant to that certain Sixty-ninth Amendment, effective as of March 18, 2015 (CSG document no. 4104400). 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives.

 


		
	
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC (“CUSTOMER”)

 

By: Charter Communications, Inc., its Manager
	
CSG SYSTEMS, INC. (“CSG”)

	
 

 

By: /s/ Mike Ciszek
	
 

 

By:  /s/ Gregory L. Cannon

	
 

Name:  Mike Ciszek
	
 

Name:  Gregory L. Cannon

	
 

Title:  VP, Billing & Collections
	
 

Title:  VP & Chief Compliance Officer

	
 

Date:  4-15-16
	
 

Date:  4/20/16
#### Onno Dag Oerlemans et al., Respondents, v Myles Cornish et al., Appellants.

[801 NYS2d 197]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (John G. Ringrose, A.J.), entered June 2, 2004 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff Onno Dag Oerlemans when defendants’ dog allegedly collided with him while he was riding his bicycle, causing him to fall to the ground. Contrary to the contention of defendants, Supreme Court properly denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Although defendants met their initial burden by establishing that their “dog was neither vicious nor interfered with traffic” *(Elmore v Wukovits,*288 AD2d 875, 875 [2001]; *see Sinon v Anastasi,*244 AD2d 973 [1997]), plaintiffs proffered sufficient evidence in opposition to the motion to raise a triable issue of fact *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Defendants’ contention that the court abused its *1309discretion in relying upon an affidavit submitted by plaintiffs in surreply to defendants’ motion is raised for the first time on appeal and thus is not properly before us *(see generally Ciesinski v Town of Aurora,*202 AD2d 984, 985 [1994]). In any event, defendants’ contention lacks merit *(see generally Barbuto v Winthrop Univ. Hosp.,*305 AD2d 623, 623-624 [2003]; *269 Fulton Corp. v H.A.B. Realty Assoc.,*179 AD2d 752, 753 [1992], *lv denied*80 NY2d 756 [1992]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
MS. PAM ESTES

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

1517 W. FRONT ST., STE. 354

TYLER, TX 75702

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case No. 17-0967 DATE: 11/29/2017

COA #: 12-16-00205-CV TC#: 15-02287-158

STYLE: NATIONAL LAND RECORDS LLC v. PEIRSONPATTERSON LLP

Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted the motion for

extension of time to file petition for review under TEX. R.

APP. P. 53.7(f) in the above-referenced case. The petition

for review is due to be filed no later than January 2, 2018. 

FILE COPY
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3727 

To require the designation of the Federal building located at McKinley Avenue 

and Third Street, S.W., Canton, Ohio, as the ‘‘Ralph Regula Federal 

Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 10, 2008 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the designation of the Federal building located 

at McKinley Avenue and Third Street, S.W., Canton, 

Ohio, as the ‘‘Ralph Regula Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RALPH REGULA FEDERAL BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Administrator of General 

5 Services shall ensure that the Federal building located at 

6 McKinley Avenue and Third Street, S.W., Canton, Ohio, 

7 is known and designated as the ‘‘Ralph Regula Federal 

8 Building’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 3727 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

4 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ralph Regula 

5 Federal Building’’. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on 

7 January 6, 2009. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacityas an officer of MSB Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant") that the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-QSB for the periodended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrantat the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such period

|  | ****Date: May 15, 2003/s/ Charles B. CookCharles B. CookPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 15, 2003/s/ Elaine R. CarbaryElaine R. CarbaryChief Financial Officer |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|