alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.1







TRANSFER AGREEMENT







Transfer of Assets and Stock


Powin Corporation







This Agreement of Transfer is made as of July 22, 2016 by and between Powin Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, and Joseph Lu, an individual residing in Tualatin Oregon and with reference to the following:







WHEREAS, Powin Corporation owns all of the outstanding stock of Q Pacific Corporation and Q Pacific Manufacturing Corporation and Powin Industries S. A. de CD, a Mexico Corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Transferred Corporations);







WHEREAS, Joseph Lu is the principal shareholder of Powin Corporation;







WHEREAS, the Transferred Corporations are operating in lines of businesses which are not profitable and not promising and are a drag on the potential value of Powin Corporation’s remaining business, namely Powin Energy Corporation;







WHEREAS, Joseph Lu has offered to relieve Powin Corporation of the burden of owning and operating the Transferred Corporations;







NOW THEREFORE it is hereby agreed as follows:







Powin Corporation hereby transfers to Joseph Lu all of the stock it owns in Q Pacific Corporation, Q Pacific Manufacturing Corporation, and Powin Industries S.A. de CD and any related assets and liabilities pertaining to such corporations and in return therefore Joseph Lu undertakes to assume the liabilities pertaining to such Transferred Corporations including the assumption and cancellation of the outstanding August 15 preferred stock and aggregate face value of approximately $7.6 Million and agrees to hold harmless Powin Corporation from any debts, obligations, liabilities as set forth in the March 31, 2016, Powin Corporation 10-Q of the Transferred Corporations.  Joseph Lu agrees that if the appraisal of the value of the Transferred Corporations exceeds the value of the liabilities pertaining to such corporation and the value of the August 15 preferred stock, he will pay to Powin Corporation such excess, if any.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date set forth above.







POWIN CORPORATION












By:  /s/ Nicholas Goyak


Nicholas Goyak


Secretary


  /s/ Joseph Lu


      Joseph Lu
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 391 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 

the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 

Mid-Atlantic and North Atlantic planning areas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2007 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the 

outer Continental Shelf in the Mid-Atlantic and North 

Atlantic planning areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Ocean and Safe 

5 Tourism Anti-Drilling Act’’ or the ‘‘COAST Anti-Drilling 

6 Act’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 391 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CER2 TAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL 

3 SHELF. 

4 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

8 CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.— 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any 

10 other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue a 

11 lease for the exploration, development, or production of 

12 oil, natural gas, or any other mineral in— 

13 ‘‘(1) the Mid-Atlantic planning area; or 

14 ‘‘(2) the North Atlantic planning area.’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Pickering 

Pafraguirre 

41"4.•••••••••■••■•■94.4-4w 

The only issue on appeal that has not arguably been rendered 

moot is whether respondent mediated in bad faith. Appellants contend 

that respondent mediated in bad faith because respondent did not orally 

disclose the full terms of a written modification offer until the end of the 

mediation. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the district 

court's determination that this shortcoming did not amount to bad-faith 

mediation. Edelstein, 128 Nev. at , 286 P.3d at 260 (indicating that a 

district court's factual determinations will not be disturbed on appeal if 

they are supported by substantial evidence). Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court's decision to not impose sanctions on respondent. Id. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Kathleen B. Delaney, District Judge 

Hafter Law 

RCO Legal, P.S. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A e04
STATE v. CHANCE.

No. COA07-1491.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 17, 2008.

Certification Date July 7, 2008.

Appeal from Moore (07CRS853, 07CRS2201, 06CRS55135).

Case reported without published opinion. Misdemeanor larceny-judgment vacated. Common law robbery-no error. Remanded for resentencing.
IN RE E.R.R.

No. COA06-1169.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Yancey (05J72, 05J73).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Donnell ROSS.

No. 56P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Daniel F. Read, Durham, for Ross.

Allen Jernigan, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th day of February 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
BYRD v. BYRD.

No. COA07-36.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Currituck (03CVD283).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph  Candelario,  hereby certify that I am the First Vice President,  Loan
Administration  of  Countrywide  Home  Loans,  Inc.,  fka,  Countrywide  Funding
Corporation,  and further  certify  with  respect to the  Pooling and  Servicing
Agreements for Series 1990-2 (Inv.# 251) by and among Ryland Mortgage Securities
Corporation and Countrywide Funding Corporation, as Servicer, as follows:

I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the fiscal
year  ended  February  28,  1997  under the  Agreements  and,  to the best of my
knowledge,  based on my review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its duties,
responsibilities or obligations under the Agreements throughout the fiscal year.




                                              /s/Joseph Candelario    5-23-97
                                              Joseph Candelario         Date
                                              First Vice President
                                              Loan Administration
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WESTERN
WIRELESS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR
THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          22,001
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,624
<INVENTORY>                                     19,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,807
<PP&E>                                         474,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,031,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,691
<BONDS>                                        529,665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       568,719
<OTHER-SE>                                   (163,851)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,031,224
<SALES>                                         14,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,943
<CGS>                                           28,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  223,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,267
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (78,775)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (78,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (78,775)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2005-21783; Airspace Docket No. 05-ACE-24]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Meade Municipal Airport, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Meade Municipal Airport, KS

DATES: Effective Date:
    901 UTC, October 27, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments in the Federal Register on July 20, 2005 (70 FR 41613). The 
FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial 
rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public 
comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse 
comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, 
or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were 
received within the comment period, the regulation would become 
effective on October 27, 2005. No adverse comments were received, and 
thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on August 23, 2005.
Elizabeth S. Wallis,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 05-17568 Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board

# AGENCY:

Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is given of the appointment of members to a Performance Review Board for Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lawrence W. Roffee, Executive Director, Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004-1111. Telephone (202) 272-0001. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations, one or more Senior Executive Service (SES) performance review boards. The function of the boards is to review and evaluate the initial appraisal of senior executives' performance and make recommendations to the appointing authority relative to the performance of these executives. Because of its small size, the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board has appointed SES career appointees from other Federal boards to serve on its performance review board. The members of the Performance Review Board for the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board are: 
    - Kenneth M. Pusateri, General Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
    - Mary L. Johnson, General Counsel, National Mediation Board.
    - Elizabeth S. Woodruff, General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

Lawrence W. Roffee,

Executive Director, Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. 

[FR Doc. 05-17857 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 174 (Friday, September 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4980-N-36]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 9, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: September 1, 2005.
Mark R. Johnston,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 05-17728 Filed 9-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
EXHIBIT 32

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

ALL-AMERICAN SPORTPARK, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

 

     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of All-American SportPark, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011:

 

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of All-American SportPark, Inc. 

 

 

Dated:  May 12, 2011

 

 

/s/ Ronald S. Boreta_________

Ronald S. Boreta

Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive Officer) and

Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to All-American SportPark, Inc. and will be retained by All-American SportPark, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

**** 

 

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board). 

*Date and Time:*                         The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on September 8, 2005, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeanette C. Brinkley, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Open Session 

### A. Approval of Minutes 

    - August 11, 2005 (Open and Closed).

### B. Reports 

    - FCS Building Association Quarterly Report.

### C. New Business—Regulations 

    - Receivership Repudiation Authorities—Final Rule.

## Closed Session* 

    - OSMO Quarterly Report.

*Session Closed—Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9). 

      ( print page 53009)    
Dated: September 1, 2005. 

Jeanette C. Brinkley, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 05-17706 Filed 9-1-05; 12:39 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
# C_2023338EN.01004302.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/43

---

Action brought on 15 August 2023 — Listan v EUIPO (Silent Loop)

(Case T-501/23)

(2023/C 338/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Listan GmbH (Glinde, Germany) (represented by: S. Pietzcker and C. Spintig, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘Silent Loop’– Application No 1 624 519

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2023 in Case R 187/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
STATE v. LOPEZ.

No. COA08-152.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Buncombe (01CRS1762).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. FERNANDEZ.

No. COA08-363.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (06CRS238982).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
# C_2023189EN.01003901.xml

| 30.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/39

---

Action brought on 14 April 2023 — Peikko Group v EUIPO — Anstar (Shape of metal beams for construction)

(Case T-192/23)

(2023/C 189/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Peikko Group Oy (Lahti, Finland) (represented by: M. Müller and A. Fottner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Anstar Oy (Villähde, Finland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union tridimensional mark (Shape of metal beams for construction) — European Union trade mark No 18 139 145

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 February 2023 in Case R 2180/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the request for declaration of invalidity of the trade mark at issue; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the request for declaration of invalidity of the trade mark at issue;

| — | order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the applicant’s costs n the present procedure and in the procedure before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the applicant’s costs n the present procedure and in the procedure before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---