alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 499 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 499

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow section 1031 
 treatment for exchanges involving certain mutual ditch, reservoir, or 
                       irrigation company stock.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 6, 2007

Mr. Salazar (for himself and Mr. Allard) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow section 1031 
 treatment for exchanges involving certain mutual ditch, reservoir, or 
                       irrigation company stock.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLOWANCE OF SECTION 1031 TREATMENT FOR EXCHANGES INVOLVING 
              CERTAIN MUTUAL DITCH, RESERVOIR, OR IRRIGATION COMPANY 
              STOCK.

    (a) In General.--Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to exchange of property held for productive use or 
investment) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(i) Special Rules for Mutual Ditch, Reservoir, or Irrigation 
Company Stock.--For purposes of subsection (a)(2)(B), the term `stocks' 
shall not include shares in a mutual ditch, reservoir, or irrigation 
company if at the time of the exchange--
            ``(1) the mutual ditch, reservoir, or irrigation company is 
        an organization described in section 501(c)(12)(A) (determined 
        without regard to the percentage of its income that is 
        collected from its members for the purpose of meeting losses 
        and expenses), and
            ``(2) the shares in such company have been recognized by 
        the highest court of the State in which such company was 
        organized or by applicable State statute as constituting or 
        representing real property or an interest in real property.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to transfers after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 94-KP-00080-SCT CHRISTOPHER REGINALD FERGUSON a/k/a CHRIS FERGUSON

v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED, PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/17/93 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILL JONES COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: CHRISTOPHER R. FERGUSON #82401 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: CHARLES W. MARIS, JR. DISTRICT ATTORNEY KIMBERLY STARKS; BEN SAUCIER NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 4/24/97 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED:

BEFORE DAN LEE, C.J., BANKS AND MILLS, JJ.

BANKS, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

Christopher Ferguson pled guilty to one count of rape and one count of sexual battery on June 2, 1993, and was sentenced to thirty years in prison with five years suspended. He appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, on the ground that his statutory and constitutional rights to speedy trial and effective assistance of counsel were violated. We find that Ferguson waived his right to seek relief from any speedy trial violation in the course of entering his guilty plea. Anderson v. State , 577 So. 2d 390 (Miss. 1991) (specifically including statutory and constitutional rights to speedy trial within the class defects and defenses that are waived through voluntary guilty pleas). Although Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), requires an "intentional relinquishment of a known right," Ferguson admits to having been aware of this right prior to expressly waiving all of his rights at the plea proceeding. Thus, we hold that he has waived this claimand is not now entitled to any relief.

Ferguson's claims that his counsel was unconstitutionally ineffective in failing to move to dismiss his indictment when more than 270 days had elapsed from his arraignment, and in signing a waiver of Ferguson's speedy trial rights, is also without merit. Both theories of ineffectiveness were also waived in his entrance of his guilty plea. Anderson v. State, 577 So. 2d 390 (Miss. 1991). Finally, Ferguson's claim that these errors on the part of his counsel vitiated the voluntariness of his guilty plea are also without merit, because he admitted that he was aware of his speedy trial rights and was familiar with the relevant case law on the right to a speedy trial at the time that he pled guilty. Thus, he pled guilty in full knowledge of his speedy trial rights, and in full knowledge that well over 270 days had passed since his arraignment. He cannot now claim that he pled guilty involuntarily. Since we hold that none of Ferguson's claims have merit, the judgment below is affirmed.
DENIAL OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF AFFIRMED. LEE, C.J., PRATHER AND SULLIVAN, P.JJ., PITTMAN, McRAE, ROBERTS, SMITH AND MILLS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Community Investors Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB
for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                       /s/Phillip W. Gerber
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Name: Phillip W. Gerber
                                       Title: President and Chief
                                       Executive Officer

Date: February 12, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Community Investors Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by
Community Investors Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 13.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act Of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B.
de C.V., a sociedad anonima bursatil de capital variableunder the laws of Mexico (the “Company”), does
hereby certify that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge:



| | 1. | The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



April 30, 2012



|               | By: | /s/Rodolfo Ramos Arvizu 
|-------------- | --- | ------------------------
|               |     | Rodolfo Ramos Arvizu    
|               |     | Chief Executive Officer 
|               |     |                         
|April 30, 2012 |     |                         
|               |     |                         
|               | By: | /s/Daniel Salazar Ferrer
|               |     | Daniel Salazar Ferrer   
|               |     | Chief Financial Officer 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and will be retained by Industrias Bachoco,
S.A.B. de C.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                 Certification

           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                   (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                  Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Western Wireless Corporation, a Washington corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that: The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 14, 2003


                                                   /s/ John W. Stanton
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   John W. Stanton
                                                   Chairman and Chief
                                                   Executive Officer


     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act; Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: National Science Board; Programs and Plans 
Committee.

DATE AND TIME: September 13, 2005, 11:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. (e.t.).

PLACE: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 
VA 22230, Public Meeting Room 110.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Tuesday, September 13, 2005, Open Session.

Open Session (11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.)

    <bullet> Review of NSF Draft Cyberinfrastructure Document.
    <bullet> Open Discussion and Comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Michael P. Crosby, Executive 
Officer and NSB Office Director, (703) 292-7000, http://www.nsf.gov/nsb.

Michael P. Crosby,
Executive Officer and NSB Office Director.
[FR Doc. 05-17951 Filed 9-6-05; 3:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF MRS. FIELDS' ORIGINAL COOKIES, INC.

The subsidiaries of Mrs. Fields' Original Cookies, Inc. and their respective state or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization are as follows:

Great American Cookie Company, Inc.

DelawarePretzelmaker, Inc.

UtahPretzelmaker Canada, Inc.

OntarioPretzel Time, Inc.

UtahMrs. Fields Gifts, Inc.

UtahMrs. Fields Cookies (Canada) Ltd.

OntarioMrs. Fields Cookies Australia

UtahU-VEST Company, LLC

UtahLV-H&M, LLC

NevadaSunshine Pretzel Time, Inc.

FloridaPeachtree Pretzel Time, Inc.

GeorgiaCMBC, Inc.

South Carolina


Each
of these subsidiaries does business under its respective corporate name.

---

QuickLinks
- 931 - 

### N ebraska 

### S upreme 

### C ourt 

### A dva nc e 

### S heets 

### 303 N ebraska 

### R eports STATE v . M c GINN Cite as 303 Neb. 931



### S tate of 

### N ebraska 

### , appellee 

### , v



### .

D a nn y 

### J. M c 

### G i nn 

### , appella n t



### . ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed August 23, 2019. No. S

- 18

- 744.

suppleme n tal opi n io n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Holt County, M ark 

### D

. K ozisek 

### , Judge, on appeal thereto from the County Court for Holt County, K ale 

### B

. B urdi c k 

### , Judge. Former opinion modi

fied. Motion for rehearing overruled. Forrest F. Peetz, of Peetz Law, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Nathan A. Liss, for appellee.
H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., M iller 

### ‐ L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c y 

### , F u n ke 

### , P

apik 

### , and F reude n ber g 

### , JJ.

P er 

### C uriam



### . This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellee, State of Nebraska, concerning our opinion in State v. McGinn

. 1 

### We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows: In the analysis section, we withdraw the last paragraph 2 

### and substitute the following:

1 State v. McGinn, ante p. 224, 928 N.W.2d 391 (2019).
2 Id. at 234, 928 N.W.2d at 398. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/15/2019 09:07 AM CST- 932 - 

### N ebraska 

### S upreme 

### C ourt 

### A dva nc e 

### S heets 

### 303 N ebraska 

### R eports STATE v . M c GINN Cite as 303 Neb. 931 

### In this matter, because we consider all evidence admit

ted by the trial court, erroneously or not, we consider the breath test in our double jeopardy analysis. Considering the breath test, the evidence was sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict for a violation of § 60

- 6,196(1)(c) as charged. As such, double jeopardy does not forbid a remand for a new trial. Therefore, in consideration of all of the above, we reverse the district court’s decision affirming the county court’s conviction and remand the cause to the district court with directions to remand the matter to the county court for a new trial. In the sole paragraph of the conclusion section, we withdraw the last sentence 3 

### and substitute the following: “Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s decision affirming the county court’s conviction, but determine double jeopardy does not require dismissal of this action.” The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modified



### . M otio n for reheari ng overruled



### .

3 Id.
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 433/2014Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 433/2014 of 28 April 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive            measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 433/2014                     

# of 28 April 2014

# implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening                        the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions                           undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine(1), and in particular Article 14(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On17 March 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

(2)In view of the gravity of the situation, the Council considers that additional persons should be added to the list of natural                              and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

(3)Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The persons listed in the Annex to this Regulation shall be added to the list set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

D. Kourkoulas                            

## ANNEXU.K.**List of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Article 1**

1

OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey Wattenberg, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Othnet, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

     4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

          (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small
business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

          (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a)  All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

          (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: March 15, 2004              By: /s/ Jeffrey Wattenberg
                                   Jeffrey Wattenberg,
                                   President and Chief Executive
                                   Officer
# C_2023286EN.01003401.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/34

---

Action brought on 19 June 2023 — Azaconsa v EUIPO — Lugar da Veiga (SHIP)

(Case T-332/23)

(2023/C 286/46)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Azaconsa SL (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: L. Broschat García and L. Polo Flores, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lugar da Veiga SLL (Lugo, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark SHIP — Application for registration No 18 124 707

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 April 2023 in Case R 1465/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | allow the registration of the mark at issue in respect of Class 35; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the registration of the mark at issue in respect of Class 35;

| — | order any party opposing the present proceedings to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order any party opposing the present proceedings to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
exv10w1









Exhibit 10.1




Q4 2010 — Q2 2011 Incentive Compensation

Harald Braun, Executive Vice President




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	% Goal	 	 
	Officer Bonus Goal	 	Weighting	 	$ Goal
	1) Achieve bookings and distribution goals
	 	 	50	%	 	$	103,593.75	 
	2) Achieve organizational development goals
	 	 	50	%	 	$	103,593.75	 
	 	 	 
	Total
	 	 	100	%	 	$	207,187.50