alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kirlin Holding Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Dated:  May 17, 2004                            /s/ David O. Lindner
                                                ----------------------------
                                                David O. Lindner
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  May 17, 2004                            /s/ Barry E. Shapiro
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Barry E. Shapiro
                                                Chief Financial Officer













                                                                              22
WILLIAMS v. PINION.

No. 138A94-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State/Pinion.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of October 2008 by Petitioner for Discretionary Review of Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of October 2008."
**Exhibit99.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,David J. Neithercut, Chief Financial Officer of Equity Residential,general partner of ERPOP, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.

 

 
| /s/ David J.  Neithercut                        |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| David J.  Neithercut                            |
| Chief  Financial Officer of  Equity Residential |
| May 13, 2003                                    |

 

**A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to ERPOP and will be retained by ERPOP andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

** **

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 2, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00704

- CV

Russell AMSBERRY,

Appellant

v.

Alejandra SALAZAR,

Appellee

From the 37t h Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 17196

The Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due

February 16, 2018.

____________ _____________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of February, 2018

.

__________ _________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
----

(2004/C 33 E/004)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1954/02

by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission

(3 July 2002)

Subject:   European Year of Remembrance and Reconciliation

What consideration is the Commission giving to whether it would be desirable to designate 2005 as the European Year of Remembrance and Reconciliation in order to positively mark the 60th anniversary of the end of the Second World War?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(7 October 2002)

The Commission has given careful consideration to the suggestion that 2005 should be designated as the ‘European Year of Remembrance and Reconciliation’.

It is clearly desirable that the 60th anniversary of the end of the Second World War — the end of war within the boundaries of our Union — should be marked in a positive way. The Commission believes, however, that the process of enlargement including the welcoming of new Members of the Parliament and new Members of the Commission is its most tangible demonstration of reconciliation. It is, of course, precisely because it remembers the First and Second World Wars and the sacrifices made by its fellow Europeans that the Commission is determined to ensure the peace, security and stability of an enlarged Union.

Whilst the Commission is not proposing to designate 2005 as the European Year of Remembrance and Reconciliation as suggested by the Honourable Member, it is considering the possibility of focusing activities on 9 May 2005 on these specific themes. This would be an effective means of informing citizens of the very essence of the Union, of the values on which the Union was founded and which continue to guide the aims and objectives of the enlarged Union. The celebration of the peaceful enlarged Union of 2005 would be fitting act of remembrance.

----
STATE v. Victor Manuel PEREZ.

No. 199P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Victor Manuel Perez.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for the State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of November 2007 by State of NC to File Response to Supplement to Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of March 2008."
# L_2015064EN.01004601.xml

| 7.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 64/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 64/46

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 668/2013 of 12 July 2013 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for 2,4-DB, dimethomorph, indoxacarb, and pyraclostrobin in or on certain products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 192 of 13 July 2013
  )

On page 49, Annex, point 1(a), amended Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, Table ‘Pesticide residues and maximum residue levels (mg/kg)’, entry 0400000, ‘4. OILSEEDS AND OILFRUITS’, column 3 ‘2,4-DB (sum of 2,4-DB, its salts, its esters and its conjugates, expressed as 2,4-DB) (R)’:

for:

‘0,02 (*)’

read:

‘0,05 (*)’

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF PERIODIC REPORT**

 

I, John R. Serino, President and Chief Executive Officer of Encision Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

·                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Dated: | January 31,   2011   |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |                      |
|   |                      |
|   | /s/   John R. Serino      |
|   |                      |
|   | John   R. Serino          |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer |

 

I, Marcia McHaffie, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of Encision Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

·                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

·                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Dated: | January 31,   2011                                                    |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                       |
|   |                                                                       |
|   | /s/   Marcia McHaffie                                                      |
|   |                                                                       |
|   | Marcia   McHaffie                                                          |
|   | Controller,   Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Humberto Meza ARREOLA.

No. 89P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

James D. Williams, Jr., for Arreola.

Robert T. Hargett, Raleigh, for Special Deputy Attorney General.

James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of February 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of April 2008."
# C_2023252EN.01005002.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/50

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 31 May 2023 — UH v ECB

(Case T-67/23 R)

(Application for interim measures - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Application for suspension of operation of an act - Lack of urgency)

(2023/C 252/61)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: UH (represented by: M. Burianski, R. Janjuah and W. Häring, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: V. Hümpfner, K. Klausch and E. Yoo, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of operation of Decision ECB-SSM-2023-DE-7 WHD-2022-0001 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 24 March 2023, by which the ECB withdrew the applicant’s authorisation as a credit institution.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Hai Sheng Chen, the ChiefExecutive Officer of CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

 

1.      TheCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this statement this 15th day of October, 2012.

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The forgoing certification is being furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being filed for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

** **

** **
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Covad Communications Group,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Mark A. Richman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                         COVAD COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.

                                         By:         /s/ MARK A. RICHMAN
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                       Mark A. Richman
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 27, 2004
Exhibit 10.40

SECOND MODIFICATION TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

ThisSecondModification to Credit Agreement (this "Modification") is entered into by and between TIER TECHNOLOGIES,
 INC.("Borrower") and IMPERIAL BANK ("Bank") as of this19th day of September,
2001, at Inglewood, California.

RECITALS

This Modification is entered into upon the basis of the following facts and understandings of the parties, which facts and understandings are acknowledged by
the parties to be true and accurate:

Bank
and Borrower previously entered into a Credit Agreement datedAugust 25, 2000, which was subsequently amended pursuant to
that certain modification agreement datedJune 18, 2001.The Credit Agreement and the modification shall collectively be referred to herein as
the "Agreement."

NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as set forth below.

AGREEMENT

1.Incorporation by Reference.The Recitals and the documents referred to therein are incorporated
herein by this reference. Except as otherwise noted, the terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.

2.Modification to the Agreement.Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions precedent as set forth
in Section 3 hereof, the Agreement is hereby modified as set forth below.





3.Legal Effect.The effectiveness of this Modification is conditioned upon receipt by Bank of this
Modification, and any other documents which Bank may require to carry out the terms hereof. Except as specifically set forth in this Modification, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement
remain in full force and effect.

4.Integration.This is an integrated Modification and supersedes all prior negotiations and agreements
regarding the subject matter hereof. All amendments hereto must be in writing and signed by the parties.

1

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have agreed as of the date first set forth above.

|TIER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |  | IMPERIAL BANK      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------
|By:                     |  | /s/ Laura B. DePole
|Title:                  |  | CFO/Secretary      
|By:                     |  |                    
|Title:                  |  |                    

2

---

QuickLinks
STATE v. William A. LUCAS-BEY.

No. 89P07-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of July 2008 by Defendant for "Petition for Writ of Supervisory Control Under N.C. Constitution, Art. 4, Sec. 12(1), N.C.G.S. Sec. 7A-32(b)":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."
#### Andrea Winograd et al., Appellants, v David A. Price et al., Respondents.

[800 NYS2d 649]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J), dated September 19, 2003, as denied their motion to introduce evidence of lost income at the trial on the issue of damages.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from is an evidentiary ruling. Such a ruling, even when made “in advance of trial on motion papers constitutes, at best, an advisory opinion which is neither appealable as of right nor by permission” *(Chateau Rive Corp. v Enclave Dev. Assoc.,*283 AD2d 537 [2001], quoting *Cotgreave v Public Adm’r of Imperial County,*91 AD2d 600, 601 [1982]; *see Curtis v Fishkill Allsport Fitness & Racquetball Club, 2*AD3d 768 [2003]; *Farmer v Nostrand Ave. Meat & Poultry,*289 AD2d 439 [2001]). S. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.
# CE2004088EN.01059901.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/599 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/599

---

(2004/C 88 E/0612)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0796/03

by Concepció Ferrer (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 March 2003)

Subject:   Bureaucracy and the EDF

Subject:

Several charities and non-governmental organisations have recently criticised the freezing by the EDF of EUR 11,2 billion earmarked for projects aimed at fighting AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria as a result of administrative problems.

Can the Commission confirm this circumstance and the figures cited?

Can the Commission explain what has been or is being done, both to resolve this situation and to ensure that it is not repeated?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(28 April 2003)

(28 April 2003)

This question is a welcome opportunity for the Commission to clarify something that appeared in the press and that can be qualified as a major misunderstanding of the modus operandi of the European Development Funds (EDF).

European Development Funds are put into place by the Community for the benefit of African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP)-countries through five-year financial protocols. Under the 6th, 7th and 8th EDF, which were still operational until the entry into force of the 9th EDF on first April 2003, a total amount of EUR 32,4 billion have been allocated to ACP countries (1). As of end February 2003, of this amount EUR 29,7 billion (92 %) were committed and EUR 21,3 billion (66 %) disbursed. This means that EUR 2,7 billion were still available for commitments (which are foreseen essentially in the course of 2003) and EUR 11,1 billion for disbursements.

1

Contrary to the information referred by the Honourable Member, these funds were not earmarked for projects aimed at fighting Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), tuberculosis and malaria. Funds from the 6th, 7th and 8th EDF were allocated to national programmes, various horizontal instruments (structural adjustment support, debt reduction, emergency assistance etc.) and to regional co-operation and integration.

A small part of the funds allocated to regional co-operation was earmarked in 2002 for a contribution of EUR 60 million from the EDF to the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria. This amount has indeed not yet been disbursed, because the contribution agreement is being negotiated between the Global Fund and the Commission. In accordance with the provisions of the Cotonou agreement, the contribution agreement with the Global Fund must guarantee that the contribution from the EDF will be used for the benefit of ACP countries. We expect this contribution agreement to be concluded shortly.

A contribution of EUR 60 million to the Global Fund was also committed under the Community Budget.

---

(1)  The total amount available under the 6th, 7th and 8th EDF, which cover also co-operation with Overseas Countries and Territories, is EUR 32,8 billion.

1

---
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Stratus      Services Group, Inc.**

| 1.     | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | the                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| Dated: March                31, 2006 | By:    | /s/                Michael A. Maltzman                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   | Michael                A. Maltzman                          |
|                                      |   | Chief                Financial Officer                      |
|                                      |   | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) |