alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                        [Unofficial English Translation]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.14

(LOGO) L E U M I

JULY 11, 2010

For the attention of:
Tefron Ltd. (the "COMPANY")

Dear Sir/ Madam,

                    RE: COVENANT DOCUMENT DATED MARCH 2, 2010
                            ("THE COVENANT DOCUMENT")

     At your request, we wish to confirm that if the Company's data, which shall
     be published in the Company's financial statements as of December 31, 2010
     (hereinafter: "THE DETERMINING REPORTS"), shall show the Company's
     non-compliance with the financial covenants as set forth in section 7.11 of
     the Covenant Document (hereinafter: "THE AGREED FINANCIAL COVENANTS"), we
     shall not exercise our right to declare your debts and obligations to us to
     be immediately due and payable, so long as the condition detailed in the
     aforementioned section shall not exceed U.S.$ - 2.1 million (negative two
     million and one hundred thousand U.S. dollars).

     This approval of ours is restricted solely to the cause as set forth above
     and it shall not derogate from our right to declare your debts and
     obligations to us in respect of any other cause, to be immediately due and
     payable.

     For the avoidance of doubt, it is hereby clarified that our waiver, as set
     forth above, is being made on a one-time basis, and it relates solely to
     the Determining Reports; our said consent shall not be deemed to be a
     waiver of your commitment to comply with the Agreed Financial Covenants
     after the date of the Determining Reports, and it shall not be construed as
     being an amendment of the Covenant Document, and all of your covenants as
     set forth in the Covenant Document shall remain in full force and effect.

     It is also clarified that this consent of ours shall not derogate from our
     rights in your regard pursuant to any document which you have signed and/or
     shall sign in our regard, or pursuant to any law.

     The validity of this letter is subject to your obtaining a similar consent
     from any entity to which non-compliance with any financial covenants based
     on the Determining Reports confers a right to the immediate payment of your
     debts and obligations thereto, including from Bank Hapoalim Ltd. and Israel
     Discount Bank Ltd.

Sincerely yours,

          /s/
-------------------------
Bank Leumi Le-Israel Ltd.

WE CONSENT TO THE FOREGOING

/s/ Amit Meridor, Eran Rotem
----------------------------
Tefron Ltd.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                               4,140
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       33,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          4,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    46,571
<PP&E>                                              96,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                      43,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     200,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               27,369
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1
<OTHER-SE>                                          16,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       200,902
<SALES>                                            191,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   191,936
<CGS>                                              113,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      113,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    62,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      2,638
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,638
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         35
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,603
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.000




</TABLE>
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Henry Krahn Hildebrandt

, * From the 106 th District Court

o f Gaines County,

Trial Court No

. 17

- 4802

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 004

- CR * January 11, 2024

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, C. J

. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 529 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 529

   To allow modified bloc voting by cooperative associations of milk 
  producers in connection with a referendum on Federal Milk Marketing 
                             Order reform.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 8, 2007

 Mr. Feingold introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow modified bloc voting by cooperative associations of milk 
  producers in connection with a referendum on Federal Milk Marketing 
                             Order reform.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    The Act may be cited as the ``Democracy for Dairy Producers Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. MODIFIED BLOC VOTING.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding paragraph (12) of section 8c of 
the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with 
amendments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, in the 
case of the referendum conducted as part of the consolidation of 
Federal milk marketing orders and related reforms under section 143 of 
the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7253), if a 
cooperative association of milk producers elects to hold a vote on 
behalf of its members as authorized by that paragraph, the cooperative 
association shall provide to each producer, on behalf of which the 
cooperative association is expressing approval or disapproval, written 
notice containing--
            (1) a description of the questions presented in the 
        referendum;
            (2) a statement of the manner in which the cooperative 
        association intends to cast its vote on behalf of the 
        membership; and
            (3) information regarding the procedures by which a 
        producer may cast an individual ballot.
    (b) Tabulation of Ballots.--At the time at which ballots from a 
vote under subsection (a) are tabulated by the Secretary of 
Agriculture, the Secretary shall adjust the vote of a cooperative 
association to reflect individual votes submitted by producers that are 
members of, stockholders in, or under contract with, the cooperative 
association.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1


         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE
         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Othnet, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31,  2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of the
          Company.



Date: December 23, 2002      By: /s/ Jeffrey Wattenberg
                                Jeffrey Wattenberg,
                                President and Chief Executive
                                Officer


Date: December 23, 2002      By: /s/ Jeffrey Wattenberg
                                Jeffrey Wattenberg,
                                Principal Financial Officer
Breta GILLIS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland.

No. 380P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

B. Ervin Brown, II, Winston-Salem, for Gillis.

Peter G. Pappas, Greensboro, for Sheriffs Dept., et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 663 S.E.2d 447.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff on the 18th day of August 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendants, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th day of August 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tegal Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas R.
Mika, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350), that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Thomas R. MikaChief
      Executive Officer and PresidentAugust
      13, 2010










CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tegal Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Christine
Hergenrother, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350), that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Christine
  HergenrotherChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      13, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EDISON
MISSION ENERGY AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         666,595
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               776,798
<PP&E>                                       3,114,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                 222,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,029,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          344,542
<BONDS>                                      2,509,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,130
<OTHER-SE>                                     819,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,029,257
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               363,001
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,723
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,435
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,288
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 21.1

                           Province Healthcare Company
                                  Subsidiaries



Brim Healthcare, Inc.
Brim Hospitals, Inc.
Care Health Company, Inc.
Mexia Principal Healthcare Limited Partnership
Mexia-Principal, Inc.
Outpatient Services, Inc.
Palestine-Principal G.P., Inc.
Palestine Principal Healthcare Limited Partnership
PHC-Ashland, L.P.
PHC-Aviation, Inc.
PHC-Belle Glade, Inc.
PHC-Charlestown, L.P.
PHC-Cleveland, Inc.
PHC-Doctors' Hospital, Inc.
PHC-Elko, Inc.
PHC-Eunice, Inc.
PHC-Fort Mohave, Inc.
PHC Hospitals, LLC
PHC-Indiana, Inc.
PHC-Jasper, Inc.
PHC-Knox, Inc.
PHC-Lake Havasu, Inc.
PHC-Lakewood, Inc.
PHC-Los Alamos, Inc.
PHC-Louisiana, Inc.
PHC-Martinsville, Inc.
PHC-Minden G.P., Inc.
PHC-Minden, L.P.
PHC-Morgan City, L.P.
PHC-Morgan Lake, Inc.
PHC-Nevada, Inc.
PHC-Opelousas, L.P.
PHC-Tennessee, Inc.
PRHC-Alabama, LLC
PRHC-Ennis G.P., Inc.
PRHC-Ennis, L.P.
Principal Hospital Company of Nevada, Inc.
Principal Knox, L.L.C.
Principal Knox, L.P.
Principal-Needles, Inc.
Vaughan Regional Medical Center, LLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          37,475
<SECURITIES>                                     3,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                       960
<INVENTORY>                                    109,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               185,583
<PP&E>                                          57,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 239,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,337
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           399
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   239,166
<SALES>                                        175,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,045
<CGS>                                          126,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,665
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,283
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,382
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,382
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        

</TABLE>
GLENN v. TDM CORP.

No. COA07-1194.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 3, 2008.

Certification Date June 23, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 435536).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Active Power, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James A. Clishem, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 4, 2010



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    JAMES A.
CLISHEM                               
|James A. Clishem President and Chief Executive Officer
SHULENBERGER v. HBD INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. COA07-470

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 19, 2008.

Certification Date March 10, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. 170550).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Samuel CAMERON.

No. 264P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

Samuel Cameron, Pro Se.

LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th day of June 2008 in *652this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Guilford County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
ATLANTIC INTEGRATED TECH. v. BANK.

No. 303P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 22, 2008.

Thomas H. Stark, Chapel Hill, for Atlantic Integrated Tech., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of September 2008 by Defendants for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Defendants (Bank of America Corp., et al.) shall have up to and including the 29th day of September 2008 to file and serve his/her response with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of September 2008."
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (“ERPOP”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, MarkJ. Parrell, Chief Financial Officer of Equity Residential, general partner ofERPOP, certify, pursuant to 18.U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                 TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of ERPOP.

 

 
| /s/                                  | Mark J. Parrell |   |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------|--------|
| Mark J. Parrell                      |            |
| Chief Financial Officer              |            |
| of Registrant’s General Partner |            |
| May 8, 2008                     |            |

 

----
STATE v. KEMP.

No. COA07-1369.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 7, 2008.

Certification Date October 27, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (07CRS1582).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of VASCO Data Security International, Inc.



|                                           |  |                                  
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                         |  | State or Country of Incorporation
|VASCO Data Security, Inc.                  |  | Delaware, U.S.A.                 
|VASCO Data Security Europe NV/SA           |  | Belgium                          
|VASCO Data Security NV/SA                  |  | Belgium                          
|Lintel Security NV/SA                      |  | Belgium                          
|VASCO Data Security Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd   |  | Singapore                        
|VASCO Data Security Pty Ltd                |  | Australia                        
|VASCO Data Security Australia Pty Ltd      |  | Australia                        
|VASCO Data Security B.V.                   |  | The Netherlands                  
|VASCO Data Security Austria GmbH           |  | Austria                          
|Able NV                                    |  | Belgium                          
|Able Holding BVBA                          |  | Belgium                          
|VASCO Data Security International, GmbH    |  | Switzerland                      
|VASCO Segurança de Dados Brasil Ltda.      |  | Brazil                           
|Kabushiki Kaisha VASCO Data Security Japan |  | Japan