alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 905/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 905/2014 of 20 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 905/2014                     

# of 20 August 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           10,982
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,099
<INVENTORY>                                       1,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 14,676
<PP&E>                                            6,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   17,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5,378
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             20
<OTHER-SE>                                       10,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     17,140
<SALES>                                              98
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    487
<CGS>                                             2,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (55)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    586
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (16,377)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (16,378)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (16,378)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.93)
        


</TABLE>
GOOD HOPE HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, Petitioner and Town of Lillington, Petitioner Intervenor NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF FACILITY SERVICES, CERTIFICATE OF NEED SECTION, and Harnett Health System, Inc., Harnett County and Wakemed, Respondents Intervenors. Harnett Health System, Inc., Harnett County, and Wakemed, Petitioners v. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Facility Services, Certificate of Need Section, Respondent and Good Hope Health System, LLC, Respondent-Intervenor.

No. 248P07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

William R. Shenton, Kenneth L. Burgess, Thomas R. West, Pamela A, Scott, Raleigh, for Harnett Health System, et al.

Joy H. Thomas, for Good Hope Health System.

June S. Ferrell, Assistant Attorney General, for NCDHHS.

C. Winston Gilchrist, Lillington, for Town of Lillington.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 658 S.E.2d 665.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of February 2008 by Petitioner & Petitioner-Intervenor (Good Hope & Town of Lillington) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of August 2008."
# C_2023112EN.01004501.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/45

---

Action brought on 10 February 2023 — DEC Technologies v EUIPO — Tehnoexport (DEC FLEXIBLE TECHNOLOGIES)

(Case T-59/23)

(2023/C 112/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: DEC Technologies BV (Enschede, Netherlands) (represented by: R. Brtka, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tehnoexport d.o.o. (Indjija, Serbia)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark DEC FLEXIBLE TECHNOLOGIES — European Union trade mark No 18 194 573

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 December 2022 in Case R 2009/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 995/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 995/2014 of 18 September 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for blue ling in Union and            international waters of II and IV by vessels flying the flag of Ireland         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 995/2014                     

# of 18 September 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for blue ling in Union and international waters of II and IV by vessels flying the flag                        of Ireland                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 September 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
6-1162-JDR-393



Western Pacific Airlines, Inc.
2864 South Circle Drive
Suite 1100
Colorado Springs, CO  80906


Subject:          Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-JDR-393 to
                         Purchase Agreement No. 1947 --
                         Aircraft Performance Guarantees


This Letter Agreement  amends Purchase  Agreement No. 1947 dated as of even date
herewith (the Agreement) between The Boeing Company (Boeing) and Western Pacific
Airlines, Inc. (Buyer) relating to Model 737-300 aircraft (the Aircraft).

All terms used herein and in the Agreement,  and not defined  herein,  will have
the same meaning as in the Agreement.

1.       Aircraft Performance Guarantees.

         The only  performance  guarantees  applicable to the Aircraft are those
set forth in  Attachment A. Such  guarantees  are exclusive and will expire upon
delivery of the Aircraft to Buyer.

2.       Confidentiality.

         Buyer  understands  that certain  commercial and financial  information
contained in this Letter  Agreement are  considered  by Boeing as  confidential.
Buyer  agrees  that it will  treat this  Letter  Agreement  and the  information
contained herein as confidential and will not, without the prior written consent
of

P.A. No. 1947
K/WPA


<PAGE>


Western Pacific Airlines, Inc.
6-1162-JDR-393   Page 2

Boeing,  disclose this Letter  Agreement or any information  contained herein to
any other person or entity, except as provided in Letter Agreement 1947-1.

Very truly yours,

THE BOEING COMPANY



By
  -----------------------
Its  Attorney-In-Fact


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this

Date:                    , 1996


WESTERN PACIFIC AIRLINES, INC.



By
  --------------------------------
Its



Attachment

P.A. No. 1947
K/WPA


<PAGE>
STATE of North Carolina v. William Thomas SMITH.

No. 92P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

William Thomas Smith, Pro Se.

Christopher H. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of February 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DI STRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00137

- CV

In re Jack Brewer §

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 2

o f Denton County (CV2012

- 03128 )

April 24, 2013

P er C uriam



### JUDGM ENT

This court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

motion for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency

relief are denied.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PE R CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Leada Tak Tai Li, the Chief Financial Officer of CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.      The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 28th day of September, 2011.





/s/ Leada Tak Tai LiLeada Tak Tai LiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement No. 333-42839 on Form S-3, Registration Statement Nos. 333-151426,
333-39003, and 333-39007 on Form S-8, and Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement Nos. 333-79557, 333-67610, 333-91956, and 333-121141 on
Form S-8 of our reports, dated February 25, 2009, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and the financial statement schedule of Intermec, Inc. and
the effectiveness of Intermec, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the adoption of new accounting standards), appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Intermec, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2008.
 
 /s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP
 Seattle,
Washington
 February
25, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 15.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International

We have reviewed the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Valeant
Pharmaceuticals International and its subsidiaries as of June 30,
2004, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income for each of the three-month and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 and the condensed consolidated
statement of cash flows for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004.
These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management.

We conducted our review in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression
of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are
not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for
them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.

We previously audited in
accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended
(not presented herein), and in our report dated March 10, 2004
we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2003, is fairly stated in all material respects in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been
derived.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 9, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.87


November 15, 2000

RCI General Contracting, Inc.
95 Madison Ave Ste 410
Morristown, NJ 07960


                          EXTENSION OF PROMISSORY NOTE
                               DUE DATE AND TERMS

For $1.00 consideration, on 31 October 2000, RCI General Contracting, Inc.,
agrees to extend the due date and all terms until 01 January, 2002, of the tWO
HUNDRED THIRTY SEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED SEVEN DOLLARS AND NO CENTS
($237,207.00) promissory note signed and executed to its favor by RCI General
Contracting



Signed:
        ------------------------------------
ex4_12.htm







ADDENDUM #2 TO THE NOTE


ISSUED FROM FLINT TELECOM GROUP, INC.


TO STEPHEN KEAVENEY


ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2009







This Addendum (this “Addendum”) to the $75,000 Promissory Note dated September 24, 2009 issued from Flint Telecom Group, Inc. (“Flint” or the “Borrower”) to STEPHEN KEAVENEY (the “Holder”) (the “Note”) is entered into is entered into by the Borrower and the Holder to edit certain terms of the Note.







Unless otherwise indicated, terms used herein that are defined in the Note shall have the same meanings herein as in the Note.







WHEREAS, the Parties hereto are replacing the Note for the purposes of clarity and ease of administration and not with the intent of creating a new security.







NOW THEREFORE, the following terms shall be amended and/or added to this Note:







The parties hereto agree to amend the following provisions to the Note as hereinafter provided:








	
  

	
3.(e) The Holder shall have the right to convert any portion of the principal due under this Note into shares of the Borrower's common stock at the lower of $0.01 per share or 50% of the three (3) lowest bid prices of the Borrower’s common stock for the ten (10) trading day prior to the conversion.












Except as herein added or amended, all the terms and conditions of the above referenced Note shall remain in full force and effect.  In the event of any conflict between this Addendum and the Note, the provisions of this Addendum shall prevail.







The parties hereby agree that signatures transmitted and received via facsimile or other electronic means shall be treated for all purposes of this Addendum as original signatures and shall be deemed valid, binding and enforceable by and against both parties.







BOTH PARTIES HERETO REPRESENT THAT THEY HAVE READ THIS ADDENDUM, UNDERSTAND IT, AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS STATED HEREIN, AND ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A SIGNED, TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF THIS ADDENDUM.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have agreed to amend the terms and conditions of the Notes as of the Effective Date.







NOTE HOLDER: STEPHEN KEAVENEY                                                                                     FLINT TELECOM GROUP, INC.












By: /s/ Stephen Keaveney                                                                                     By: /s/ Vincent Browne


Name: Stephen Keaveney, individually                                                                      Name: Vincent Browne


                         Title: Chief Executive Officer







Date: October 29, 2010                                                                                        Date: October 29, 2010