alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III
|Leo F. Wells, III       
|Chief Executive Officer 
|November 12, 2004       





|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|November 12, 2004
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 62/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 62/2014 of 24 January 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 62/2014                     

# of 24 January 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 January 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 20-0242

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOURNEY RYDER JOHN WIENKE,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is 

given an extension of time until June 18, 2021 to prepare, file and serve the 

Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 19 2021

05/19/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0242
Beaufort BOE v. BEAUFORT BD. OF COMM.

No. 106PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 16, 2008.

Garris Neil Yarborough, Fayetteville, Jonathan V. Maxwell, Greensboro, for Beaufort Co. Commissioners.

Brian C. Shaw, Richard Schwartz, Raleigh, for Beaufort Co. BOE.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of May 2008 by NC Asso. of Co. Commissioners for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule *66628(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of May 2008."
STATE v. Gay E. BLANKENSHIP.

No. 88P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of July 2007 by Defendant to Add Attachments to Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of October 2007."

HUDSON, J., recused.
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert J. PETRICK.

No. 592P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Mark Montgomery, Durham, for Petrick.

John G. Barnwell, Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney Generals, David Saacks, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 652 S.E.2d 688.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 11th day of December 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of December 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
STATE v. SPENCER.

No. COA08-73.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Gaston (06CRS65469, 06CRS65475, 06CRS65476, 06CRS19030, 06CRS65479).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
IN RE J.E.K.

No. COA08-140.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 3, 2008.

Certification Date June 23, 2008.

Appeal from Haywood (06JT32, 06JT33).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-116060, No. 333-134522),Form S-8/S-3 (No. 333-81755) and Forms S-8 (No. 333-145067, No.333-127247, No. 333-35632, No. 333-49984, No. 333-106211, No. 333-116061, and No. 333-116900) ofCovad Communications Group, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2008 relating to the financialstatements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K**.**/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Exhibit 10.4   Promissory Note Between Floridino's Inc. and
               Raffles Toho Inc.


                         PROMISSORY NOTE

On the 31st day of December, 1998, Floridino's Inc., agrees to pay
Raffles Toho, Inc., forty five thousand three hundred eighty
eight dollars and no cents ($45,388.00) at the rate of 8.25
percent per annum.  A balloon payment will be due on the 1st day
of January, 2000.



                                  ____________________________
                                  Nick Pirgousis, President
                                  Floridino's Inc.
STATE of North Carolina v. Ernest Lee Junior PETTIS.

No. 522P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, for Pettis.

*388Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Rick Shaffer, District Attorney, for State of NO.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 651 S.E.2d 231.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of October 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

Notice of a partially open meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. 

# Time and Place:

Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# Open Agenda Item:

Ex-Im Bank Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee for 2005.

# Public Participation:

The meeting will be open to public participation for Item No. 1 only.

# Further Information:

For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Tel. No. (202) 565-3957).

James K. Hess,

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-1727  Filed 1-26-05; 12:39 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
Exhibit 31.1

**CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Rhett R.Atkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of  Eden Bioscience Corporation, certifythat:

1.  I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of  Eden Bioscience Corporation;

2.  Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not  contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to  state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,  in lightof the circumstances under which such statements  were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered  by this quarterly report;

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and  other financial information included in thisquarterly  report, fairly present in all material respects the  financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of  the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this  quarterly report;

4.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are  responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or  caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be  designed under our supervision, to ensure that material  informationrelating to the registrant, including its  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others  within those entities, particularly during the period in  which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;

b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s  disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this  report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the  disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the  period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

c)  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's  internal control over financial reportingthat occurred  during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has  materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the registrant's internalcontrol over financial  reporting; and

5.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have  disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal  control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board  of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)  allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in  the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial  reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect  theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and  report financialinformation; and

b)  any fraud,whether or not material, that involves  management or other employees who have asignificant role in  the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  July 26,2005

|   |   |   | /s/      Rhett R. Atkins              |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                       |
|   |   |   | Rhett R. Atkins                       |
|   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1157/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1157/2014 of 29 October 2014 correcting the Slovenian version of Commission Regulation            (EC) No 141/2007 concerning a requirement for approval in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament            and of the Council for feed business establishments manufacturing or placing on the market feed additives of the category            ‘coccidiostats and histomonostats’ (Text with EEA relevance)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1157/2014                     

# of 29 October 2014

# correcting the Slovenian version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 141/2007 concerning a requirement for approval in accordance                        with Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council for feed business establishments manufacturing                        or placing on the market feed additives of the category ‘coccidiostats and histomonostats’                     

# (Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 laying down                           requirements for feed hygiene(1), and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)In the Slovenian language version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 141/2007(2) the terms ‘feed business operators’, ‘feed business establishments’, ‘placing on the market’ and ‘category’ are erroneous.                              Therefore a correction of the Slovenian language version is necessary. The other language versions are not affected.

(2)Regulation (EC) No 141/2007 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

(3)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain                              and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Concerns only the Slovenian language version.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 35, 8.2.2005, p. 1.                           

2

Commission Regulation (EC) No 141/2007 of 14 February 2007 concerning a requirement for approval in accordance with Regulation                              (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council for feed business establishments manufacturing or placing on                              the market feed additives of the category coccidiostats and histomonostats (OJ L 43, 15.2.2007, p. 9).
Blondale HUGHES v. Epifanio RIVERA-ORTIZ, M.D., and Callaway Associates, LLP, d/b/a Promed of North Carolina, PLLC.

No. 611A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

S. Luke Largess, Charlotte, for Hughes.

Harvey L. Cosper, Lori Keeton, Leigh A. Kite, Charlotte, for Rivera-Ortiz.

Scott M. Stevenson, Tash L. Winebarger, Charlotte, for Callaway Asso.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 653 S.E.2d 165.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiff on the *73326th day of December 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."

Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Accordingly, the new brief of the Plaintiff shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

         By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Syndicated Food Service International, Inc.

         Signed this 8th day of October, 2003.

By: /s/ Barry L. Nogay                   By: /s/ Thomas P. Tanis, Jr.
--------------------------------         ---------------------------------------
Barry L. Nogay                           Thomas P. Tanis, Jr.
Vice President and Principal             President and Chief Executive Officer
Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Syndicated Food Service
International, Inc. and will be retained by Syndicated Food Service
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.6


***Text Omitted and Filed Separately
Confidential Treatment Requested
Under C.F.R. § 200.84(b)(4) and 17 C.F.R. 24b-2





ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUSCARE® SUPPORT AGREEMENT BETWEEN


CAMPUS MANAGEMENT CORP. AND


BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION, INC.


Purpose of Addendum: Future Pricing 


This Addendum, effective upon the mutual execution by the parties hereunder, is incorporated into and made a part of the CampusCare Support Agreement (the “CampusCare Agreement”) between Campus Management Corp. (“CMC”) and Bridgepoint Education, Inc. (“Customer”), dated as of February 15, 2005, as amended.  All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the CampusCare Agreement.  The CampusCare Agreement shall be amended, as follows: 




		
	1.
	Should Customer execute a full scope Infrastructure as a Service Agreement for its production environment (“IaaS Agreement”) by December 31, 2017, and for so long as it remains hosted with CMC on such IaaS Agreement, Customer shall receive CampusCare Premium support at the CampusCare Fees shown below, commencing 2018.




	
		
	Licensed Program
	CampusCare® Premium
Fees

	CampusNexus® Student
Portal
Web Services
	$[***]
$[***]
$[***]

	CampusNexus CRM
	$[***]

	Less Prepayment Discount**
	($[***])

	Total Annual CampusCare Renewal Fees
	$[***]

	Annual TAM Fees*
	$[***]

	Annual PSSC Fees*
	$[***]




    
*TAM and PSSC: Professional Services are separate and distinct from CampusCare Services, and are subject to the terms and conditions of the PSA and relevant SOWs.  See SOW No. 205435, SOW No. 206092, and SOW No. PSISVC-207385, for details.  


*Professional Services Hours: The CampusCare fees above include [***] Professional Services hours to be used during each calendar year.


**Prepayment Discount. Customer shall receive the Prepayment Discount if Customer pays the Annual CampusCare Renewal Fees, TAM Fees, and PSSC Fees by November 30 of the previous year. 


		
	2.
	The above discount is further contingent on timely payments and no default under the CampusCare Agreement.










[Signature Page Follows]


Add CCare    Page 1 of 2    Confidential
TA-061316


[***] Confidential portions of this document have been redacted and filed separately with the Commission.







This Addendum is deemed effective upon acceptance at CMC’s principal offices.  Except as expressly stated herein, all other terms of the CampusCare Agreement, as amended, remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


	
		
	BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION INC.
	CAMPUS MANAGEMENT CORP.

	By:   /s/ Mike Stansbury   ]   
	By:   /s/ Anders Nessen   3]   

	Print:   Mike Stansbury   
	Print:   Anders Nessen   ]

	Title:   Vice President IT   
	Title:   CFO    

	Date:   Jun 30, 2016   
	Date:       Jun 30, 2016    












Add CCare    Page 2 of 2    Confidential
TA-061316