alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ETTER v. PIGG.

No. COA07-92.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Henderson (01SP287).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Bryant Jerome RIVERS.

No. 569P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Bryant Jerome Rivers, Pro Se.

Robert K. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st day of November 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is 

not citable as precedent. It is a public record. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

05-3209 

KIRBY A. FACIANE, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 

Respondent. 

 __________________________ 

 DECIDED: March 10, 2006 

 __________________________ 

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

Kirby A. Faciane appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board, denying his petition for review of the board’s initial decision affirming his removal 

from government service by the United States Postal Service. Faciane v. U.S. Postal 

Service, SF0752040005-I-3 (MSPB Mar. 4, 2005). We affirm. 

We must affirm the board’s decision unless it was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse 

of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; obtained without procedures 
required by law, rule or regulation having been followed; or unsupported by substantial 

evidence. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (2000). The board properly considered the relevant 

evidence before it and did not abuse its discretion in making its credibility 

determinations. Substantial evidence supports the board’s findings that the agency 

proved its charges against Faciane by a preponderance of the evidence, that there was 

a nexus between Faciane’s removal and promoting the efficiency of the agency’s

operations, and that the penalty imposed was not an abuse of the agency’s discretion. 

Additionally, the board properly concluded that the agency was not required to show 

that Faciane violated a specific rule, regulation, or policy. See LaChance v. MSPB, 147 

F.3d 1367, 1371-72 (Fed. Cir. 1998). 

Faciane waived his claims for disability discrimination and violation of the Family

and Medical Leave Act by not presenting them to the board. Furthermore, his claims for 

procedural defects that allegedly occurred before the board and during the agency’s 

disciplinary proceedings are not applicable to the disciplinary proceedings at hand. 

05-3209 2
```

                                                                                                       Exhibit 23.1

                                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration  Statements  (Forms S-8,  No.  333-42422,  No.
333-89913,  No.  333-66767,  and No.  333-66769)  pertaining  to the Tropical  Sportswear  Int'l  Corporation  2000
Long-Term  Incentive  Plan; the Tropical  Sportswear  Int'l  Corporation  Employee Stock Option Plan as Amended and
Restated;  the Tropical  Sportswear  Int'l  Corporation  Non-Employee  Director  Stock Option Plan; and the Apparel
International  Group,  Inc.  1996 Stock Option Plan,  of our report  dated  November 13, 2001,  with respect to the
consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of Tropical  Sportswear Int'l  Corporation  included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 29, 2001.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of
one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III                              
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive Officer May 11, 2006



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                              
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer
May 11, 2006
<PAGE>

                            SOLUTIA INC.

                            CERTIFICATE


     I, Karen L. Knopf, Assistant Secretary of Solutia Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify that the following is a full, true and
correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Company on February 23, 2000, at which meeting a quorum was present and
acting throughout:

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that each officer and director who may be required
     to sign and execute the 10-K or any document in connection therewith
     (whether for and on behalf of the Company, or as an officer or
     director of the Company, or otherwise), be and hereby is
     authorized to execute a power of attorney appointing Karl R.
     Barnickol and Karen L. Knopf, or either of them acting alone, his
     or her true and lawful attorney or attorneys to sign in his or her
     name, place and stead in any such capacity such Annual Report on
     Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto and documents in connection
     therewith, and to file the same with the Commission or any other
     governmental body, each of said attorneys to have power to act with
     or without the others, and to have full power and authority to do and
     perform, in the name and on behalf of each of said officers and
     directors, every act whatsoever which such attorneys, or any one
     of them, may deem necessary, appropriate or desirable to be done
     in connection therewith as fully and to all intents and purposes
     as such officers or directors might or could do in person.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand in my official
capacity and affixed the corporate seal of the Company this 1st day of
March, 2000.



                                  /s/ Karen L. Knopf
                              -------------------------------
                                   Karen L. Knopf
                                   Assistant Secretary


SEAL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

          - 38 CFR Part 3 
          - RIN 2900-AK97 

# AGENCY:

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of proposed rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        In a document published in the                         **Federal Register**                         at 67 FR 10866 on March 11, 2002, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposed to amend its adjudication regulations concerning the time a claimant has in which to request a                         *de novo*                         review of a decision at the Veterans Service Center level after filing a Notice of Disagreement. This document withdraws that proposed rule.                     

# DATES:

The proposed rule is withdrawn as of January 31, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Maya Ferrandino, Consultant, Policy and Regulations Staff, Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20420, telephone (202) 273-7232. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Currently, a claimant who disagrees with a decision by a Veterans Service Center may appeal that decision by filing a notice of disagreement (NOD). Under 38 CFR 3.2600, a claimant who has filed a timely NOD may also obtain                     *de novo*                     review of the decision of the Veterans Service Center by requesting such review with the NOD or within 60 days after the date that VA mails notice of the availability of                     *de novo*                     review. We proposed reducing that 60-day period to 15 days. However, we have determined that revision of the                     *de novo*                     review process is unnecessary at this time. Therefore, we are withdrawing the proposal.                 

Anthony J. Principi, 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 05-1704 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 Valeant Pharmaceuticals International  2006 Equity Incentive Plan  Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
 Grant Notice Agreement Company Plan Common Stock Award
  1. Consideration.
 2. Vesting
 3. Dividend Equivalents .
 4. Distribution of Shares of Common Stock provided,  Original Distribution Date 




---



##### 



provided, however, st th
 5. Number of Shares.
 6. Compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
 7. Securities Law Compliance
 8. Restrictive Legends.
 9. Transferability.
 10. Award Not a Service Contract
 11. Unsecured Obligation
 2.




---



##### 



12. Withholding Obligations.
 (a)
 (b)
 13. Notices
 14. Headings .
 15. Amendment . provided,
however
 16. Miscellaneous.
 (a)
 3.




---



##### 



(b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 17. Governing Plan Document
 18. Effect on Other Benefit Plans.
 19. Choice of Law .
 20. Resolution of Disputes .
 4.




---



##### 



JAMS
 21. Severability.
 5.
STATE v. WILKES

No. COA07-395

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 19, 2008.

Certification Date March 10, 2008.

Appeal from Caldwell (04CRS1206, 04CRS1208).

Decision without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN T-NETIX, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                       109
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          48,227
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,544
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,735
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    394
<INCOME-TAX>                                       157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                237
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       237
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
# **Exhibit 32.2**

#  

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

#  

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,the Chief Financial Officer of Western Sizzlin Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2008 and the financial statements contained therein, fully comply with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q and thefinancial statements thereto fairly present, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of June 30,2008, and the period then ended.

 
| /s/ Robyn B. Mabe |   | Date: November 14,  2008 |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------|

 

----
STATE v. MILLER.

No. COA07-10.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 16, 2007.

Certification Date November 5, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS99396, 05CRS99398, 05CRS99399).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. Adrian Lemont McFADDEN.

No. 432P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 8, 2007.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th day of September 2007 by Defendant to Appoint Counsel:

*706"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of November 2007."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1077/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1077/2014 of 13 October 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1077/2014                     

# of 13 October 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                                  Tekgraf, Inc.


                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                            1996        1997
                                                            ----       ------
<S>                                                       <C>          <C>
Net income(loss)...................................       $   43       $ (393)


Basic and diluted weighted average number of common
  shares Common shares..............................       1,084        2,581





Basic and diluted net income(loss) per share              $ 0.04       $(0.15)
</TABLE>
WATTIKER v. BOWENS.

No. COA07-805.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Durham (05CVD6313).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
OAO  Technology  Solutions,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  on  Form  S-8  (File  Nos.
333-75273,  333-75407, 333-82789, 333-36534, and 333-65354,) of our report dated
February  11,  2002,  appearing  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K of OAO
Technology  Solutions,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  for the year ended  December 31,
2001.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche

McLean, VA
March 25, 2002
# Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (repealed)Show full title

Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 concerning the notification            to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union, replacing Council Regulation            (EU, Euratom) No 617/2010 and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 736/96 (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council

# of 26 February 2014

# concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union, replacing                        Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 617/2010 and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 736/96 (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Regulation (EU) 2018/1504 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 October 2018 repealing Regulation (EU) No 256/2014                                 concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union.
STATE v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA07-923.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 20, 2008.

Certification Date June 9, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS61596).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.