alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 919/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 919/2013 of 20 September 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for greater forkbeard in            EU and international waters of VIII and IX by vessels flying the flag of Spain         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 919/2013                     

# of 20 September 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for greater forkbeard in EU and international waters of VIII and IX by vessels flying                        the flag of Spain                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 1262/2012 of 20 December 2012 fixing for 2013 and 2014 the fishing opportunities for EU vessels                              for certain deep-sea fish stocks(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 356, 22.12.2012, p. 22.
In the Matter of D.W., A Minor Child. Appealed by Respondent Father.

No. 75P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

K. Edward Greene, Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, for Father.

Roger A. Askew, Assistant County Attorney, Scott W. Warren, County Attorney, for Wake County Attorney's Office.

Hal Morris, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of February 2008 by Respondent (Father) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
STATE of North Carolina v. Donald BARNES.

No. 215P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Donald Barnes, Pro Se.

Kathleen M. Waylett, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th day of May 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
# C_2023121EN.01000701.xml

| 3.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 26 January 2023 — Keva, Landskapet Ålands pensionsfond and Kyrkans Centralfond v Skatteverket

(Case C-39/23, Keva and Others)

(2023/C 121/10)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Keva, Landskapet Ålands pensionsfond and Kyrkans Centralfond

Respondent: Skatteverket

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the fact that dividends paid by domestic companies to foreign public pension institutions are subject to withholding tax, whereas the corresponding dividends are not taxed if they accrue to the own State through its general pension funds, constitute such negative differential treatment that it entails a restriction of the free movement of capital prohibited, in principle, by Article 63 TFEU? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the fact that dividends paid by domestic companies to foreign public pension institutions are subject to withholding tax, whereas the corresponding dividends are not taxed if they accrue to the own State through its general pension funds, constitute such negative differential treatment that it entails a restriction of the free movement of capital prohibited, in principle, by Article 63 TFEU?

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, what are the criteria that should be taken into account when assessing whether a foreign public pension institution is in a situation which is objectively comparable to that of the own State and its general pension funds? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, what are the criteria that should be taken into account when assessing whether a foreign public pension institution is in a situation which is objectively comparable to that of the own State and its general pension funds?

| 3. | Can a possible restriction be regarded as being justified by overriding reasons of public interest? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Can a possible restriction be regarded as being justified by overriding reasons of public interest?

---
# C_2023071EN.01003301.xml

| 27.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/33

---

Action brought on 12 December 2022 — Penguin Random House v EUIPO — Ediciones Literarias Independientes (PLAN B)

(Case T-777/22)

(2023/C 71/44)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial, SAU (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ediciones Literarias Independientes, SL (Barcelona)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: figurative mark PLAN B — EU trade mark No 17 887 136

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 September 2022 in Case R 2015/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative, annul the contested decision in respect of the goods in Classes 9 and 16 not covered by the Spanish mark PLAN B (mixed) No. 3 641 418 and covered by the contested EU mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the contested decision in respect of the goods in Classes 9 and 16 not covered by the Spanish mark PLAN B (mixed) No. 3 641 418 and covered by the contested EU mark;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1OFFICERS’  CERTIFICATION

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 63 § 1350, the Chief Executive Officer and theChief Financial Officer of Austins Steaks & Saloon, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 and thefinancial statements contained therein, fully comply with the requirements ofSections 139a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q and the financial statements theretofairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the company.

 
| /s/ Victor F. Foti                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Victor F. Foti, Chief Executive Officer |
|                                    |
| /s/ Robyn Mabe                          |   |
| Robyn Mabe, Chief Financial Officer     |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-43248, 333-56122, 333-104725, 333-115039, 333-123587, and 333-132792) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Active Power, Inc. of our reports datedFebruary 29, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of Active Power, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Active Power, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2007. 

/s/     Ernst & Young LLP 

Austin, Texas 

February 29, 2008
IGLESIAS v. CITY OF OXFORD.

No. COA07-347.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Granville (06CVS994).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. CROCKETT.

No. COA07-371.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Cleveland (06CRS50812, 06CRS50813).

Cases reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheets and unaudited condensed statements of
income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to
date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         175,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               711,695
<PP&E>                                      23,634,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,681,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,925,940
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         3,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  7,240,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,703,193)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,681,293
<SALES>                                      1,563,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,563,396
<CGS>                                          356,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  356,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,716,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             382,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (892,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (892,086)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (892,086)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.29)


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Santiago RODRIQUEZ.

No. 36P05-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Santiago Rodriquez, Pro Se.

*857Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th day of April 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Alamance County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
EXHIBIT 23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-100176, 333-100177,and 333-123855 of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 24, 2008,related to the audit of the consolidated financial statements of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc.as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for each of the years in the three year period endingDecember 31, 2007 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares,Inc../s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.Augusta, Georgia
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3681 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ‘‘Joseph A. Ryan Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 3681 ES

1 SECTION 1. JOSEPH A. RYAN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las 

4 Vegas, Nevada, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jo5 seph A. Ryan Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph A. Ryan Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate November 20, 2008. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3681 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ‘‘Joseph A. Ryan al Service located at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in
STATE v. GREEN.

No. COA07-722.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Columbus (04CRS50337, 04CRS50338, 04CRS50561, 04CRS50594, 04CRS50967).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lauren P. Silvernail, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2003 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Lauren P. Silvernail             
|                   |  | Lauren P. Silvernail,                
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer and          
|                   |  | Vice President, Corporate Development

27
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Enviro Voraxial Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alberto DiBella, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By:           /s/Alberto DiBella


Alberto DiBella


Principal Executive Officer


April 14, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   9
                 
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                    JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                    575
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                    873
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           60
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>             1,503
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                 10,239
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                   10,175
<LOANS>                                79,160
<ALLOWANCE>                               472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         94,328
<DEPOSITS>                             74,075
<SHORT-TERM>                                0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                       629
<LONG-TERM>                             8,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                   11
<OTHER-SE>                             11,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>         94,328
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         1,631
<INTEREST-INVEST>                         185
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            3
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        1,819
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                        884
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,006
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                     813
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               2
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                           487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           367
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                236
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              236
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                           3.58
<LOANS-NON>                                 0
<LOANS-PAST>                              457
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                            0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                           129
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                          478
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               8
<RECOVERIES>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                         472
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                   472
        



</TABLE>
___________

No. 95-2186

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Ronald Gregory Garcia, also * Western District of Missouri.

known as Anthony Degeena, also * 

known as Anthony Geena, also * [UNPUBLISHED]

known as Vincent Vereli, also *

known as Eric V. Variel, *

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 7, 1996

 Filed: March 25, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Gregory Garcia pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting (1) the

possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and (2) the use of a

firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense, in violation

of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), and 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 924(c)(1).

While Garcia's appeal was pending, the Supreme Court issued its decision

in Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), defining the "use" prong

of § 924(c)(1), and Garcia then filed a supplemental brief arguing that his

guilty plea to the firearm count was not voluntary and intelligent because

it was based upon the Eighth Circuit's prior, inconsistent construction of

§ 924(c)(1). Because the government has now conceded that "the gun count

should be reversed in this case," we vacate Garcia's guilty plea and remand

for further proceedings. We
-2-

have not considered and take no position regarding whether the government

on remand may amend Count Two of the indictment.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the

case remanded.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
STATE v. IBARRA.

No. COA07-1236.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from Davidson (05CRS56708, 05CRS56709).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EDEN Bioscience Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Bradley S. Powell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |                                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/   Bradley S. Powell                                   
| |                                                           
| | Bradley S. Powell
Chief Financial Officer
November 7, 2002