alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3736 

To amend chapter 417 of title 49, United States Code, to require air carriers 

and ticket brokers to notify consumers of taxes, fees, charges, and 

fuel surcharges in a timely manner, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11 (legislative day, DECEMBER 10), 2008 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 417 of title 49, United States Code, 

to require air carriers and ticket brokers to notify consumers of taxes, fees, charges, and fuel surcharges in 

a timely manner, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AIRLINE TICKET FEE NOTIFICATION REQUIRE4 MENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 41712 of title 49, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 3736 IS

1 ‘‘(c) NOTICE OF TAXES, FEES, CHARGES, AND FUEL

2 SURCHARGES.—(1) It shall be an unfair or deceptive prac3 tice under subsection (a) for any air carrier, foreign air 

4 carrier, or ticket broker— 

5 ‘‘(A) to display the price of a ticket for air 

6 transportation without simultaneously displaying all 

7 taxes, fees, charges, and fuel surcharges applicable 

8 to such ticket; or 

9 ‘‘(B) to fail to provide an online purchaser of 

10 a ticket for air transportation with information, in11 cluding the amount and description, of each tax, fee, 

12 charge, and fuel surcharge applicable to such ticket 

13 before requiring such purchaser to provide any per14 sonal information, including name, address, phone 

15 number, e-mail address, and credit card information. 

16 ‘‘(2) It shall be an unfair or deceptive practice under 

17 subsection (a) for any air carrier or foreign air carrier— 

18 ‘‘(A) to fail to provide an online purchaser of a 

19 ticket for air transportation with information re20 garding fees for checked baggage, seating assign21 ments, and optional in-flight goods and services; or 

22 ‘‘(B) to increase the price of a ticket for air 

23 transportation through a fuel surcharge that is not 

24 correlated to the price of fuel paid by the air carrier 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•S 3736 IS

1 or the amount of fuel used by such air carrier for 

2 such air transportation.’’. 

3 (b) RULEMAKING.—The Secretary of Transportation, 

4 in consultation with the Administrator of the Federal 

5 Aviation Administration, shall promulgate regulations to 

6 carry out section 41712(c) of title 49, United States Code, 

7 as added by subsection (a), including establishing a proce8 dure for determining whether fuel surcharges of an air 

9 carrier or foreign air carrier are sufficiently correlated to 

10 the fuel costs of such air carrier. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3625 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3625

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 245 North Main Street in New City, New York, as the ``Kenneth Peter 
                   Zebrowski Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KENNETH PETER ZEBROWSKI POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 245 North Main Street in New City, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Kenneth Peter Zebrowski Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kenneth 
Peter Zebrowski Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate October 2 (legislative day, September 
      17), 2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3625

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 245 North Main Street in New City, New York, as the ``Kenneth Peter 
                   Zebrowski Post Office Building''.
```
SMITH v. MAULDIN.

No. COA07-1482.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Stanly (05CVS1751).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# C_2023083EN.01002801.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/28

---

Action brought on 23 January 2023 — Laboratorios Normon v EUIPO — Sofar (NORMOCARE)

(Case T-19/23)

(2023/C 83/36)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Laboratorios Normon, SA (Tres Cantos, Spain) (represented by: I. Gonzalez-Mogena Gonzalez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sofar SpA (Trezzano Rosa, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark NORMOCARE — European Union trade mark No 17 767 294

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 October 2022 in Case R 916/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and, if appropriate, Sofar Spa to pay the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and, if appropriate, Sofar Spa to pay the costs of the present proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Randy ROGERS v. Shana Jane BLACK.

No. 113P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Shana Jane Black, Pro Se.

Donald E. Harrop, Jr., Dunn, for Randy Rogers.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of March 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
STATE of North Carolina v. Darryl Vonzell SULLIVAN, Jr.

No. 564P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Darryl V. Sullivan, Jr., Pro Se.

Kay Linn Miller Hobart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of November 2007 by Defendant in this matter, for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
#### In the Matter of Belinda Watson, Respondent, v James Watson, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 809]

In a spousal support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the husband appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated June 21, 2004, which, after a hearing, confirmed the findings of the same court (Levy, S.M.), also made after a hearing, that he willfully violated an order of support of the same court (Levy, H.E.), dated December 21, 2001, inter alia, directed him to be incarcerated for a period of six months, and directed the entry of a judgment for arrears from March 7, 2003, to June 2, 2004, in the sum of $9,750, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated June 21, 2004, which, inter aha, is in favor of the wife and against him in the sum of $9,750.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as directed *498the entry of judgment in the sum of $9,750 is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that portion of the order was superseded by the judgment; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The husband’s failure to pay support constituted prima facie evidence of a willful violation of the order of support *(see*Family Ct Act § 454 [3] [a]; *Matter of Zullo v Hom,*10 AD3d 614, 616 [2004]). The burden then shifted to the husband to offer competent, credible evidence of his inability to comply with that order *(see Matter of Powers v Powers,*86 NY2d 63, 69-70 [1995]; *Matter of Sapp v Taylor,*298 AD2d 590, 592 [2002]). Since the husband failed to sustain his burden to rebut the prima facie evidence of willfulness by showing sufficient proof of his inability to pay, the Family Court properly found that he had willfully violated the support order *(see Matter of DeCamp v DeCamp,*8 AD3d 274 [2004]; *Matter of Statfeld v Statfeld,*296 AD2d 415, 416 [2002]; *Matter of Richards v Bailey,*296 AD2d 412, 413 [2002]; *Matter of Wright v Lyons,*288 AD2d 481, 482 [2001]; *Matter of Dorner v McCarroll,*271 AD2d 530, 531 [2000]; *Matter of Nieves v Gordon,*264 AD2d 445, 445-446 [1999]).

The husband’s remaining contention is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 835/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 835/2014 of 31 July 2014 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities            guaranteed (Филе Елена (File Elena) (TSG))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 835/2014                     

# of 31 July 2014

# entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Филе Елена (File Elena) (TSG))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Bulgaria's application to register the name ‘Филе Елена’ (File                              Elena) was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Филе Елена’ (File Elena) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 July 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)**U.K.

#### BULGARIAU.K.

Филе Елена (File Elena) (TSG)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 70, 8.3.2014, p. 6.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|August 12, 2005           
|                          
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|August 12, 2005
STATE v. McCRAY.

No. COA07-1255.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 17, 2008.

Certification Date July 7, 2008.

Appeal from Nash (06CRS52946).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 412 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 56
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 412

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2007

 Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Obama) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           February 17, 2007

       Committee discharged; ordered to be placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANE EVANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lane Evans Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lane Evans 
Post Office Building''.
                                                        Calendar No. 56

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 412

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 17, 2007

       Committee discharged; ordered to be placed on the calendar
```
MOORE v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE.

No. 330A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 19, 2008.

Robert O. Crawford, III, Aaron C. Hemmings, Raleigh, for Moore.

George L. Simpson, III, Raleigh, for Nationwide.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of August 2008 by NCATL for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of August 2008."
STATE v. McDONALD.

No. COA07-1567.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Jackson (06CRS51541).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51250-51251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17210]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2005-21704; Airspace Docket No. 05-ACE-20]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Newton, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Newton, KS.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, October 27, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on July 21, 2005 
(70 FR 41949). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on October 27, 2005. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule 
will become effective on that date.


[[Page 51251]]


    Issued in Kansas City, MO on August 15, 2005.
Elizabeth S. Wallis,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 05-17210 Filed 8-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
STATE v. SPRUILL.

No. COA07-576.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from Tyrrell (06CRS554).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2076
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             832
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    60
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       6499
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           11781
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             11595
<LOANS>                                          74110
<ALLOWANCE>                                        460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   97446
<DEPOSITS>                                       72015
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                579
<LONG-TERM>                                      13631
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                7
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       11214
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   97446
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   4398
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  917
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   129
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,444
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2451
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3017
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             2427
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      118
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   1868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    541
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         359
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       359
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.53
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       645
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   459
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      191
<RECOVERIES>                                        74
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  460
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            460
        

</TABLE>