alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Lauren P. Silvernail, hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.



|                     |  |                                                                                           |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: April 30, 2007 |  | /s/ Lauren P. Silvernail                                                                  |  | 
|                     |  | Lauren P. Silvernail                                                                     
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer & Vice President, Corporate Development
STATE v. BEASLEY.

No. COA07-1157.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (96CRS25622, 96CRS25756).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
STATE v. TRUCELL.

No. COA07-1249.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from Granville (05CRS53342).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3665 

To amend chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code, to modify the rate 

of accrual of annual leave for administrative law judges, contract appeals 

board members, and immigration judges. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. AKAKA (for himself and Mr. PRYOR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code, to 

modify the rate of accrual of annual leave for administrative law judges, contract appeals board members, and 

immigration judges. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3665 IS

1 SECTION 1. ACCRUAL RATE OF ANNUAL LEAVE FOR AD2 MINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, CONTRACT AP3 PEALS BOARD MEMBERS, AND IMMIGRATION 

4 JUDGES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6303 of title 5, United 

6 States Code, is amended by striking subsection (f) and in7 serting the following: 

8 ‘‘(f) Notwithstanding any other provision of this sec9 tion, the rate of accrual of annual leave under subsection 

10 (a) shall be 1 day for each full biweekly pay period in the 

11 case of any employee who— 

12 ‘‘(1) holds a position which is subject to— 

13 ‘‘(A) section 5372, 5372a, 5376, or 5383; 

14 or 

15 ‘‘(B) a pay system equivalent to a pay sys16 tem to which any provision under paragraph (1) 

17 applies, as determined by the Office of Per18 sonnel Management; or 

19 ‘‘(2) is an immigration judge as defined under 

20 section 101(b)(4) of the Immigration and Nation21 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(b)(4)).’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 this section shall take effect on the first day of the first 

24 applicable pay period beginning on or after 30 days after 

25 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
TERRY'S FLOOR FASHIONS, INC. v. CROWN GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. and Jerry Shumate Alvis.

No. 362A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

David M. Duke, Shannon S. Frankel, Raleigh, for Alvis.

Walter L. Tippett, Jr., Raleigh, Caroline V. Barbee, for Terry's Floor Fashions.

Prior report: 184 N.C.App. 1, 645 S.E.2d 810.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 24th day of July 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Accordingly, only those issues which are the, basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Defendant's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.

Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.
RECORD IMPOUNDED

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0662-20

 A-0670-20

ROBERT SIPKO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

KOGER, INC., and 

RASTISLAV SIPKO,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

KOGER DISTRIBUTED 

SOLUTIONS, INC., KOGER

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, 

INC., KOGER LIMITED 

(DUBLIN), and GEORGE SIPKO,

Defendants.

______________________________

Submitted July 6, 2021 – Decided July 22, 2021

Before Judges Messano and Suter.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
2

A-0662-20

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey,

Chancery Division, Bergen County, Docket No. 

C-000393-07.

Newman, Simpson & Cohen, LLP, attorneys for 

appellant Rastislav Sipko (Daniel J. Cohen and Daniel 

C. Stark, on the briefs). 

Lum Drasco & Positan, LLC, attorneys for appellant 

Koger, Inc. (Paul A. Sandars, III, and Scott E. Reiser, 

of counsel and on the brief).

Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, attorneys for 

respondent Robert Sipko (Michael S. Stein, of counsel; 

Erik M. Corlett and Timothy P. Malone, on the briefs).

Foreman Holt, attorneys for respondent Charles M.

Forman (Michael E. Holt, on the briefs).

PER CURIAM

Appellants advised the court that all parties have agreed to the dismissal 

of these appeals without prejudice pursuant to a fully executed consent 

stipulation of dismissal filed with the court. The appeals are dismissed without 

prejudice pursuant to the terms of the stipulation of dismissal.
# Council Decision of 28 January 2014 on the existence of an excessive deficit in Croatia (2014/56/EU) (repealed)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 28 January 2014

# on the existence of an excessive deficit in Croatia

# (2014/56/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Council Decision (EU) 2017/1191 of 16 June 2017 abrogating Decision 2014/56/EU on the existence of an excessive deficit in                                 Croatia.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          39,704
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,761
<PP&E>                                         625,952
<DEPRECIATION>                               (355,811)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 503,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          619,380
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,664,527
<OTHER-SE>                                (21,866,588)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   503,842
<SALES>                                        130,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,814
<CGS>                                           86,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (9,024)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (198,656)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                325,957
<CHANGES>                                        3,348
<NET-INCOME>                                   130,649
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3   Promissory Note Between Floridino's Inc. and
               Raffles Toho Inc.


                         PROMISSORY NOTE

On the 31st day of August 1999, Floridino's Inc., agrees to pay
Raffles Toho, Inc., Seventy two thousand one Hundred ninety seven
dollars and no cents ($72,197.00) at the rate of 8.25 percent per
annum.  A balloon payment will be due on the 1st day of September,
2000.



                                  ____________________________
                                  Nick Pirgousis, President
                                  Floridino's Inc.
STATE v. RIOS.

No. COA07-1232.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CRS238682).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CrownPacific Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter W. Stott, Director, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
| /s/ Peter W. Stott            |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Peter W. Stott                |
| Director, President and       |
| Chief Executive Officer       |
| Crown Pacific Partners,  L.P. |
| November 13, 2003             |

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. andwill be retained by Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# Council Decision of 15 September 2014 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Council of            Members of the International Olive Council concerning the prolongation of the 2005 International Agreement on olive oil and            table olives (2014/664/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 15 September 2014

# on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Council of Members of the International Olive Council                        concerning the prolongation of the 2005 International Agreement on olive oil and table olives                     

# (2014/664/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207, in conjunction with Article                           218(9) thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)The International Agreement on olive oil and table olives, 2005(1) (the ‘Agreement’) will expire on 31 December 2014 unless the Council of Members of the International Olive Council (IOC)                              decides to prolong it in accordance with Article 47(1) and (2) of the Agreement.

(2)On 19 November 2013, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations on behalf of the Union for the conclusion                              of a new international agreement on olive oil and table olives.

(3)A new agreement is currently being discussed within the IOC. It is now certain that the deadline of 31 December 2014 for the                              conclusion of an agreement cannot be met. It is therefore in the Union's interest to ensure that the existing Agreement is                              prolonged.

(4)Prolongation of the existing Agreement is separate from the negotiations concerning the conclusion of a new agreement. The                              Union should therefore request a one-year prolongation of the existing Agreement, and vote in favour of such prolongation                              if this were proposed to the Council of Members,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The position to be adopted on the Union's behalf, within the Council of Members of the International Olive Council, is to                     request a one-year prolongation of the existing Agreement on olive oil and table olives, and to vote in favour of the one-year                     prolongation of the 2005 International Agreement on olive oil and table olives if this were proposed to the Council of Members.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 15 September 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 302, 19.11.2005, p. 47.
IN RE I.S.E.G.

No. COA07-917.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 18, 2007.

Certification Date January 7, 2008.

Appeal from Dare (06J77).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                         RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Donald J. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Reckson Associates Realty
Corp. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1)       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                  and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:  December 16, 2002


                                By /s/ Donald J. Rechler
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Donald J. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 52455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17593]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Bancorp International Group, Inc. File No. 500-1; Order of 
Suspension of Trading

August 31, 2005.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that all of 
the securities currently trading in the name of Bancorp International 
Group, Inc. (``BCIT'') and purportedly signed by Thomas Megas as 
President and M. Puig as Secretary are counterfeit. BCIT is quoted on 
the Pink Sheets LLC.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of BCIT.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in BCIT is suspended for 
the period from 9:30 a.m. e.d.t., August 31, 2005 through 11:59 p.m. 
e.d.t., on September 14, 2005.

    By the Commission.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-17593 Filed 8-31-05; 11:53 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
```
# C_2023286EN.01002301.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 31 May 2023 — Pārtikas drošības, dzīvnieku veselības un vides zinātniskais institūts BIOR v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-344/23, BIOR)

(2023/C 286/28)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa (Senāts)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant at first instance, respondent in cassation: Pārtikas drošības, dzīvnieku veselības un vides zinātniskais institūts BIOR

Defendant at first instance, appellant in cassation: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the expression ‘scientific instrument or apparatus’ in Article 46(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 of 16 November 2009 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty, (1) be interpreted as meaning that it may include objects which, by virtue of their particular technical structure and functioning, themselves serve directly as a means of scientific research? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the expression ‘scientific instrument or apparatus’ in Article 46(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 of 16 November 2009 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty, (1) be interpreted as meaning that it may include objects which, by virtue of their particular technical structure and functioning, themselves serve directly as a means of scientific research?

| 2. | Must the combined nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (2) as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1925 of 12 October 2017 (3) be interpreted as meaning that subheading 3926 90 92 90 of the combined nomenclature may include fish tags made of plastic? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must the combined nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (2) as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1925 of 12 October 2017 (3) be interpreted as meaning that subheading 3926 90 92 90 of the combined nomenclature may include fish tags made of plastic?

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 324, p. 23.

(2)  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1925 of 12 October 2017 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2017 L 282, p. 1).

---
# C_2023296EN.01001501.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Cassation (France) lodged on 7 April 2023 — Mutuelle assurance des travailleurs mutualistes (Matmut) v TN and Others

(Case C-236/23, Matmut)

(2023/C 296/17)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Court of Cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mutuelle assurance des travailleurs mutualistes (Matmut)

Defendants: TN, Société MAAF assurances, Fonds de garantie des assurances obligatoires de dommages (FGAO), PQ

Question referred

Must Articles 3 and 13 of Directive 2009/103 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 (1) be interpreted as precluding the nullity of a contract for civil liability motor insurance from being declared enforceable against a passenger who is a victim where that person is also the policyholder and intentionally made a false statement at the time of conclusion of the contract which gave rise to that nullity?

---

(1)  Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (OJ 2009 L 263, p. 11).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      69,475,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,665,203
<ALLOWANCES>                                   367,805
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            71,461,007
<PP&E>                                      27,028,102
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,733,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             122,854,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,585,722
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      100,277,750
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,760
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,704,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               122,854,601
<SALES>                                      7,437,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,437,496
<CGS>                                        4,966,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,966,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,436,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               395,618
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (14,156,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (14,156,280)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (93,233,780)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (35.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (35.22)


</TABLE>