alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 837/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 837/2014 of 31 July 2014 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities            guaranteed ЛУКАНКА ПАНАГЮРСКА (LUKANKA PANAGYURSKA) (STG)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 837/2014                     

# of 31 July 2014

# entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed ЛУКАНКА ПАНАГЮРСКА (LUKANKA PANAGYURSKA) (STG)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Bulgaria's application to register the name ‘ЛУКАНКА ПАНАГЮРСКА’                              (‘LUKANKA PANAGYURSKA’) was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘ЛУКАНКА ПАНАГЮРСКА’ (‘LUKANKA PANAGYURSKA’) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name ‘ЛУКАНКА ПАНАГЮРСКА’ (‘LUKANKA PANAGYURSKA’) (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.

The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)                     set out in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014(3).                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 July 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 89, 28.3.2014, p. 57.                           

3

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU)                              No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CrownPacific Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter W. Stott, Director, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
| /s/ Peter W. Stott           |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Peter W. Stott               |
| Director, President and      |
| Chief Executive Officer      |
| Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. |
| May 26, 2004                 |

 

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Crown Pacific Partners, L.P.and will be retained by Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# C_2023179EN.01005701.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/57

---

Action brought on 21 February 2023 — PAN Europe v Commission

(Case T-104/23)

(2023/C 179/82)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Bailleux, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission’s decision, dated 12 December 2022 and notified to the applicant on 13 December 2022, to partially reject a confirmatory application lodged in accordance with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision, dated 12 December 2022 and notified to the applicant on 13 December 2022, to partially reject a confirmatory application lodged in accordance with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; (1)

| — | order the Commission to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Commission decision breaches:

| — | Article 2(1), Article 4(2), second indent, and Article 4(3), second subparagraph, of Regulation No 1049/2001; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 2(1), Article 4(2), second indent, and Article 4(3), second subparagraph, of Regulation No 1049/2001; and

| — | Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2) |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2)

More specifically, the Commission decision must be annulled to the extent that it refuses access to documents based on an unlawful application of the exceptions relating to the protection of court proceedings [Article 4(2), second indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001] and of the decision- making process [Article 4(3), second subparagraph, of Regulation No 1049/2001].

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies (OJ 2006 L 264, p. 13).

---
# C_2023179EN.01007201.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/72

---

Action brought on 3 April 2023 — Lacroix v EUIPO — Xingyu Safety Tech (ADAMAS)

(Case T-177/23)

(2023/C 179/100)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Nathalie Lacroix (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca and C. Sotomayor Garcia, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Xingyu Safety Tech Co. Ltd (Gaomi, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative trade mark ADAMAS — Application for registration No 18 387 424

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 January 2023 in Case R 2004/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | order to alter the contested decision by stating that the EUTM application No 18 387 424 ADAMAS must be granted for ‘sportswear; shoes’ in class 25 due to the lack of likelihood of confusion between the trademarks under comparison, after giving due consideration of the relevant circumstances of the case; |
| --- | --- |

—

order to alter the contested decision by stating that the EUTM application No 18 387 424 ADAMAS must be granted for ‘sportswear; shoes’ in class 25 due to the lack of likelihood of confusion between the trademarks under comparison, after giving due consideration of the relevant circumstances of the case;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs;

alternatively, should the Court refuse the first form of order, the applicant claims that Court should:

| — | raise a decision ordering the annulment of the contested decision to the extent that the application No 18 387 424 is refused protection of class 25 goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

raise a decision ordering the annulment of the contested decision to the extent that the application No 18 387 424 is refused protection of class 25 goods;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 845/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 845/2014 of 31 July 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for sandeel in Union waters of            IIa, IIIa and IV — Management areas 1, 2, 3 and 4 by vessels flying the flag of Germany         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 845/2014                     

# of 31 July 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for sandeel in Union waters of IIa, IIIa and IV — Management areas 1, 2, 3 and 4 by                        vessels flying the flag of Germany                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 July 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
Exhibit








[Archrock Logo]


August 3, 2016


[Name]
[Address]


Re:    Compensation Changes
Dear [Name]:


In light of current market conditions and actions taken by Archrock, Inc. (the “Company”) to reduce costs, including reductions to the Company’s staffing levels, and improve cash flow, you and the Company have agreed to implement a 10% reduction in your base salary.  In connection with this reduction, effective as of August 7, 2016, your annual base salary will be $[____].  


[In addition, by signing this letter below, you acknowledge that you have waived payment of your annual short-term incentive payment in respect of the Company’s fiscal year 2016 under the Company’s 2016 short-term incentive program.  You will again become eligible to receive an annual short-term incentive payment commencing with the Company’s fiscal year 2017.]1 


If you incur a Qualifying Termination of Employment (as defined in your CoC Agreement or Severance Agreement (each defined below), as applicable), for purposes of calculating your severance payments and benefits under the CoC Agreement or Severance Agreement (as applicable), the Company will apply your pre-reduction base salary [and the target short-term incentive opportunity that would have otherwise applied to you with respect to the Company’s fiscal year 2016, absent this letter]1.  For purposes of this letter, (i) “CoC Agreement” means the change of control agreement between you and the Company and (ii) “Severance Agreement” means the severance benefit agreement between you and the Company.  In addition, if you die or become disabled, then for purposes of calculating your life, accidental death and disability, short-term disability and long-term disability insurance benefits provided or made available by the Company or its affiliates, the Company will apply your pre-reduction base salary.


Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary in the CoC Agreement or the Severance Agreement, by signing this letter, you hereby waive any right you may have to resign your employment with the Company for “Good Reason” for purposes of such agreements due to a material reduction in your base salary based on the changes to your compensation that are described in this letter.  However, in the event of any subsequent reduction in your base salary, the cumulative impact of the subsequent reduction and the compensation changes described in this letter may be taken into account for purposes of determining whether “Good Reason” exists under the CoC Agreement or the Severance Agreement (as applicable).


Please acknowledge your acceptance of, and agreement to, the terms and conditions set forth in this letter by signing and dating this letter in the space provided below and returning it to the Company.  Should you have any questions about this letter, please contact [_____] at [_____].  




________________________


1 For the CEO only. 

















Sincerely,


ARCHROCK, INC.






By:                         
[Name]
[Title]


Acknowledged and Agreed:




By:                         


Print Name:                     


Date:
MOSTELLER MANSION, LLC v. MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING OF GEORGIA, INC.

No. COA07-664.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 20, 2008.

Certification Date June 9, 2008.

Appeal from Buncombe (05CVS3046).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 175 (Monday, September 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1910-BJ-4789] ES-053726, Group No. 27, Illinois


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Illinois.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Fourth Principal Meridian, Illinois

T. 13 S., R. 1 W.

    The plat of survey represents the survey of a portion of the Lock 
and Dam No. 26 acquisition boundary on an island in the Mississippi 
River in Township 13 South, Range 1 West, of the Fourth Principal 
Meridian, in the State of Illinois, and was accepted September 2, 2005. 
We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be made available to the public as a matter of information.

    Dated: September 2, 2005.
Stephen D. Douglas,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 05-17974 Filed 9-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
STATE v. WILSON.

No. COA07-255.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Iredell (05CRS53798, 05CRS53799, 05CRS14444).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. DISMISSED as to the assignments of error pertaining to the dismissal of defendant's motion to suppress. NO ERROR as to the trial.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 20-14465

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

DEVIN FABIAN COLLINS, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Respondent-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:20-cv-02278-SDM-JSS

____________________

USCA11 Case: 20-14465 Date Filed: 06/03/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 20-14465

Before NEWSOM, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The district court denied Devin Collins’s first 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 motion to vacate his 210-month sentence for possession of 

a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) 

and 924(e) solely on the ground that Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. 

Ct. 2191 (2019)—which was decided while Collins’s direct appeal 

was still pending—doesn’t apply retroactively to initial § 2255 motions. In Rehaif, the Supreme Court determined that for a § 922(g) 

offense, “the Government must prove both that the defendant 

knew he possessed a firearm and that he knew he belonged to the 

relevant category of persons barred from possessing a firearm.” Id. 

at 2200. Collins contends that the government never proved 

whether he knew the latter. In Seabrooks v. United States, we held 

that Rehaif “announced a new rule of substantive law that applies 

retroactively to . . . initial § 2255 motion[s].” 32 F.4th 1375, 1383 

(11th Cir. 2022) (per curiam). Accordingly, we VACATE and 

REMAND to the district court to decide Collins’s § 2255 motion 

under Rehaif and/or other grounds the parties may raise on remand.

USCA11 Case: 20-14465 Date Filed: 06/03/2022 Page: 2 of 2
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 794/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 794/2014 of 22 July 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 794/2014                     

# of 22 July 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.