alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,639,239
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,399,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,146,949
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,474,398
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,240,219
<LOANS>                                     61,715,212
<ALLOWANCE>                                    378,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,221,788
<DEPOSITS>                                 100,996,344
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            489,044
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       947,294
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,789,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             107,221,788
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,634,231
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,220,960
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                23,510
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,787,761
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,512,925
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,512,295
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,365,836
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   50,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,416,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (755,520)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (755,520)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.94
<LOANS-NON>                                    110,372
<LOANS-PAST>                                   373,704
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               506,635
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                (209,762)
<RECOVERIES>                                    31,730
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              378,603
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           378,603
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
### [Cite as State ex rel. Spaulding v. Indus. Comm. , 93 Ohio St.3d 653, 2001-Ohio-1893.]

1 T HE S TATE EX REL . S PAULDING , A PPELLEE , v . I NDUSTRIAL C OMMISSION OF O HIO ET AL .; K ROGER C OMPANY , A PPELLANT . [Cite as State ex rel. Spaulding v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 653.] Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.

(No. 01-817 — Submitted November 13, 2001 — Decided December 19, 2001.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-640.

__________________ The judgment of the court of appeal s is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
M OYER , C.J., D OUGLAS , R ESNICK , F.E. S WEENEY , P FEIFER , C OOK and
L UNDBERG S TRATTON , JJ., concur.

__________________ Robert A. Muehleisen , for appellee. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Karl J. Sutter , for appellant.

__________________
McNEILL v. McNEILL.

No. COA07-679.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 17, 2008.

Certification Date July 7, 2008.

Appeal from Randolph (07CVD3).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 31, 2017

s1023

Order 

Clerk

October 31, 2017

154127

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154127

COA: 331623

Ottawa CC: 15-039118-FH

JODI LYNN DOEZEMA, f/k/a

JODI LYNN KOTRCH,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of January 31, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the March 29, 

2016 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in People 

v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos. 152946-8). On 

order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 24, 2017, 500 Mich 453 (2017), 

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alvin A. Hirsch, the Chief Financial Officer of Mile Marker International,
Inc. (the "Company"), have executed this certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 1st
day of November, 2004.


/s/ Alvin A. Hirsch
---------------------
    Alvin A. Hirsch
Chief Financial Officer

                                       20
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6785

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HERBERT BRUCE BAILEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00402-MBS; 5:06-cv-01414-MBS) Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: August 1, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Bruce Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Herbert Bruce Bailey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bailey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE of North Carolina v. Royce GORDON, Jr.

No. 608P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Royce Gordon, Jr., Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 20th day of December 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Buncombe County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
**Exhibit 99.4**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, I, Thomas E. Legro, Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of SelkirkFunding Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

| (1)    |   | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                      |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    |   | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation. |

| May 14, 2003 |   | /s/ THOMAS E. LEGRO Thomas E. Legro Vice President, Controller and     Chief Accounting Officer   Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation |
|--------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation and will be retained by Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
STATE v. MOORE.

No. COA06-1618.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Beaufort (04CRS53077, 04CRS53059, 05CRS4661).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 June 30, 2016 
 Michael
Lewis, Ph.D. 
 Bio Diligence Partners Inc. 
 This letter shall
serve as an eleventh amendment to the Services Agreement dated July 2, 2004. It is hereby agreed to extend the Agreement from July 1, 2016 to July 1, 2017. Compensation described in Exhibit A of the Agreement, as previously
amended, will continue at the rate of $157,500.00 per annum and paid on a monthly basis. The reimbursement for 70% of the health insurance cost for consultant shall continue, paid quarterly. 

All other sections of the Agreement continue as written. 
  

			
	Cara Therapeutics, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Derek Chalmers

	Name:	 	Derek Chalmers, Ph.D., D.Sc.
	Title:	 	President & CEO
	
	Bio Diligence Partners, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Lewis

	Name:	 	Michael Lewis, Ph.D.
	Title:	 	President
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General
Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III                                
|                                                        
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief
Executive Officer August 8, 2003



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                
|                                                          
|Douglas P. Williams Chief
Financial Officer August 8, 2003
HARRISON v. HARRISON

No. COA07-869.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Lenoir (03CVD212).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
HODGSON CONSTRUCTION v. HOWARD.

No. 5P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 8, 2008.

Daniel Johnson, for Hodgson Construction.

*664Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 654 S.E.2d 7.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th day of January 2008 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of January 2008."
STATE v. Dane LOCKLEAR, Jr.

No. 578A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 16, 2008.

Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Dane Locklear, Jr.

William P. Hart, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, William B. Crumpler, Amy Kunstling, Assistant Attorney Generals, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of April 2008 by State of NC to unseal all sealed documents:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of April 2008."
RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                            OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Donald J. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Reckson Associates Realty
Corp. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1)          The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
            period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  May 9, 2003

                            By  /s/ Donald J. Rechler
                                ---------------------------------------------
                                Donald J. Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reckson Associates Realty Corp. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 20 (Tuesday, February 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5182-5183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 25, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Andre Anderson, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Wilson Bank Holding Company, Lebanon, Tennessee; to acquire 50 
percent of the voting shares of Community Bank of Smith County, 
Carthage, Tennessee, and Dekalb Community Bank, Smithville, Tennessee.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. First Centralia Bancshares, Inc., Centralia, Kansas; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Corning Investment Company, Inc., 
Atchison, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
Farmers State Bank, Corning, Kansas.

[[Page 5183]]

    2. Morrill Bancshares, Inc., Merriam, Kansas; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Nemaha Investment Company, Inc., 
Atchison, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First 
State Bank of Goff, Goff, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 26, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-1766 Filed 1-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# C_2023155EN.01003101.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/31

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 31 January 2023 — A, B, C, D v MS Amlin Insurance SE

(Case C-45/23, MS Amlin Insurance)

(2023/C 155/40)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: A, B, C, D

Respondent: MS Amlin Insurance SE

Question referred

Should Article 17(1) of Directive 2015/2302 (1) of the European Parliament and the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC, be interpreted as meaning that the security which it requires also applies to the refund of all sums already paid by travellers or on their behalf where the traveller terminates the package travel contract by reason of unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Article 12(2) of that Directive and the organiser is declared insolvent after the termination of the package travel contract on that basis, but before those sums have actually been refunded to the traveller, as a result of which that traveller suffers a financial loss and consequently bears an economic risk in the event of the organiser’s liquidation?

---

(1)  OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 53328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17756]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau

27 CFR Parts 4, 24, and 27

[Re: Notice No. 51]
RIN 1513-AB00


Certification Requirements for Imported Natural Wine (2005R-
002P); Correction

AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 24, 2005, TTB published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking in the Federal Register regarding the certification 
requirements for imported natural wine. We also published a temporary 
rule on the same subject in the same issue. In that notice of proposed 
rulemaking, a cross reference contains an incorrect CFR section number. 
This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gail Davis, International Trade 
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, telephone 202-927-
8110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 24, 2005, TTB published a notice 
of proposed rulemaking, Notice No. 51, in the Federal Register entitled 
``Certification Requirements for Imported Natural Wine'' (70 FR 49516). 
Notice No. 51 was cross-referenced to a temporary rule on the same 
subject, which was published in the same issue as T.D. TTB-31 (70 FR 
49479). Notice No. 51 contains a cross reference with an incorrect CFR 
section number.
    Therefore, in the Federal Register of August 24, 2005, on page 
49518, in the first column, in paragraph number (7), the cross-
reference instruction should read as follows:
    [The text of proposed Sec.  27.140 is the same as the text of Sec.  
27.140 as set forth in the temporary rule published elsewhere in this 
issue of the Federal Register.]

    Dated: June 1, 2005.
Francis W. Foote,
Director, Regulations and Rulings Division.
[FR Doc. 05-17756 Filed 9-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Telly Savalas COLEMAN.

No. 126P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Coleman.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 640 S.E.2d 784.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th day of March 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."