alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 936/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 936/2014 of 22 August 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for blue ling in Union and            international waters of II and IV by vessels flying the flag of United Kingdom         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 936/2014                     

# of 22 August 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for blue ling in Union and international waters of II and IV by vessels flying the flag                        of United Kingdom                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated financial statements of Twin City Bancorp,
Inc. and Subsidiaries in the filing to which this schedule is an
exhibit and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,429
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,880
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,779
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             0
<LOANS>                                     75,943
<ALLOWANCE>                                    149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             106,932
<DEPOSITS>                                  89,624
<SHORT-TERM>                                     0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,467
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,000
<COMMON>                                     1,273
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             106,932
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,020
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,041
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                93
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,154
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,066
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,156
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,998
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  108
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,093
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,326
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,326
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   802
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0
<LOANS-NON>                                      0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    0
<RECOVERIES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SUE MARIE WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. No. 14-35066 D.C. No. 3:12-cv-00723-MO
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 13, 2015 ** Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. Sue Marie Wright appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Soci al Security Act. We have jurisdiction 

# FILED
MAR 11 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. The district court did not deny Wright due process by ruling from the bench rather than issuing a written decision. The di strict court’s oral ruling, recorded in a written transcript, together with the admi nistrative record, provide sufficient facts and reasoning to allow Wright an understanding of the disposition of her case, and to enable an informed review by this court. See Bray v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin. , 554 F.3d 1219, 1226 (9th Cir. 2009) (explaining that meaningful review of an administrative decision requires access to the facts and reasons supporting that decision); cf. United States v. Sesma-Hernandez , 253 F.3d 403, 405 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc) (holding that “oral findings on a transcribed record are sufficient to meet the ‘in writing’ requirement of due process” for a district court’s decision in a criminal case to revoke supervised release). The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) did not err in failing to evaluate evidence regarding Wright’s employment record from 2002. This evidence was not probative of whether Wright lacked the residual functional capacity to perform any work during the period beginning in October 2008, her alleged disability onset date. See Tobeler v. Colvin , 749 F.3d 830, 833 (9th Cir. 2014) (“Evidence is relevant when it has ‘any tendency to makea fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence’”(quoting Fe d. R. Evid. 401(a))). Even assuming 2the evidence was relevant, any error on th e part of the ALJ was harmless because the employment records “did not describe any limitations beyond those [Wright] herself described, which the ALJ disc ussed at length and rejected based on well-supported, clear and convincing reasons.” Molina v. Astrue , 674 F.3d 1104, 1122 (9th Cir. 2012) (footnote omitted). AFFIRMED.

3
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  /s/                  Randall D.                  Holmes                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                                                                                                                                                             | Randall                  D. Holmes |
| Title:                                                                                                                                                                 | Chief                  Executive Officer |
| Date:                                                                                                                                                                       | November                  27, 2007 |

| /s/                    Jeffrey H.                    Strasberg                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                                                                                                                                                        | Jeffrey                    H. Strasberg |
| Title:                                                                                                                                                            | Executive                      Vice President andChief                      Financial Officer |
| Date:                                                                                                                                                                  | November                    27, 2007 |

----
# C_2023189EN.01002601.xml

| 30.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/26

---

Appeal brought on 17 April 2023 by European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 07 February 2023 in Case T-81/22, Euranimi v Commission

(Case C-252/23 P)

(2023/C 189/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, V. Villante, avvocati, P. Gjørtler, advokat,)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare admissible the present appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare admissible the present appeal;

| — | set aside the order under appeal and declare the action brought by Euranimi admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order under appeal and declare the action brought by Euranimi admissible;

| — | send back the case to the General Court for examining the substance of Euranimi’s action; |
| --- | --- |

—

send back the case to the General Court for examining the substance of Euranimi’s action;

| — | order the European Commission to bear the legal cost of the present appeal and of the procedure at first instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to bear the legal cost of the present appeal and of the procedure at first instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on three main pleas in law:

First plea: error in law in interpreting the Article 263 (4) TFEU and in particular the requisite of ‘direct and individual concern’ — wrong qualification of facts.

Second plea: error in law in interpreting the final limb of Article 263 (4) TFEU and the requisite and notion of regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures — wrong qualification of facts and distortion of evidence.

Third plea: wrong qualification of facts and distortion of evidence.

---
# The Zimbabwe (Financial Sanctions) (Suspension) Regulations 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 795

Criminal Law

# The Zimbabwe (Financial Sanctions) (Suspension) Regulations 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

on 4th April 2013

Laid before Parliament

at 12.00 p.m. on 5th April 2013

Coming into force

at 3.00 p.m. on 5th April 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (25.2.2014) by The Zimbabwe (Financial Sanctions) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/383), **reg. 7**
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3681 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3681

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Joseph A. 
                      Ryan Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSEPH A. RYAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Joseph A. Ryan Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph A. 
Ryan Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate November 20, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3681

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Joseph A. 
                      Ryan Post Office Building''.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D., hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 6, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D.        
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D.            
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Lauren P. Silvernail, hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 8, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Lauren P. Silvernail                                         
|                     |  |  |  | Lauren P. Silvernail                                             
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate Development

This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
<PAGE>
                                                          EXHIBIT 23
 
                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Solutia's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-34561, 333-34587,
333-34589, 333-34591, 333-34593, 333-34683, 333-35689, 333-47911 and
333-51081) of our opinions dated February 24, 1999 (which includes
an explanatory paragraph as to a change in the method of accounting
in 1997), appearing in and incorporated by reference in this annual
report on Form 10-K of Solutia Inc. for the year ended December 31,
1998.


 
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
St. Louis, Missouri
March 15, 1999

                                 25
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 743/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 743/2014 of 9 July 2014 replacing Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 as regards Minimum            frequency of analyses (Text with EEA relevance)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 743/2014                     

# of 9 July 2014

# replacing Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 as regards Minimum frequency of analyses

# (Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme                           for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC(1), and in particular Article 14(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Annex VII to Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012(2) determines the minimum frequency of analyses for relevant fuels and materials to be applied by operators for the determination                              of calculation factors.

(2)Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 provides that Annex VII to that Regulation is to be reviewed on a regular basis                              and in the first instance not more than two years from Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 entering into force.

(3)Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 should be amended to clarify the classification and categorisation of fuels and materials                              listed therein to improve consistency regarding application of appropriate factors used in the calculation of emissions.

(4)In the interest of clarity, it is appropriate to replace Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 601/2012.

(5)Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(6)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Climate Change Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### “ANNEX VII

#### Minimum frequency of analyses (Article 35)

1

OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32.                           

2

Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant                              to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 181, 12.7.2012, p. 30).
STATE v. William Leroy BARNES.

No. 146A94-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 17, 2008.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, George B. Currin, Raleigh, for Barnes.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of January 2008 by NCATL for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of January 2008."