alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Council Decision 2014/449/CFSP (repealed)Show full title

Council Decision 2014/449/CFSP of 10 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in South Sudan (repealed)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/449/CFSP                     

# of 10 July 2014

# concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in South Sudan (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 of 7 May 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in South Sudan and                                 repealing Decision 2014/449/CFSP.
STATE v. JOHNSON.

No. COA07-907.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 5, 2008.

Certification Date February 25, 2008.

Appeal from Nash (05CRS54572, 05CRS54573).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
BEAUFORT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BEAUFORT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS.

No. 106PA08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Garris Neil Yarborough, Fayetteville, for Beaufort Co. Commissioners.

Brian C. Shaw, Richard Schwartz, Raleigh, for Beaufort Co. BOE.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 656 S.E.2d 296.

*ORDER*

Defendant's petition for discretionary review is allowed with respect to the following issues:

In light of Article IX, Section 2 of the North Carolina Constitution, is the statutory framework for resolving school funding disputes between the county board of education and the county board of commissioners constitutional?

If so, has the statutory framework been properly applied in this case?

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 10th day of April, 2008.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Forms S-8, No. 333-89913,  No. 333-66767,  and No. 333-66769) pertaining to the
Tropical Sportswear Int'l Corporation  Employee Stock Option Plan as Amended and
Restated;  pertaining to the Tropical Sportswear Int'l Corporation  Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan; and pertaining to the Apparel  International  Group,
Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, of our report dated November 12, 1999, with respect
to the  consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of Tropical  Sportswear
Int'l  Corporation  included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
October 2, 1999.



                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Tampa, Florida
December 29, 1999
#### In the Matter of Eric Titmas, Appellant, v Daniel Hogue, as Sheriff of Sullivan County, Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 626]

*635Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.), entered October 7, 2004 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent computing petitioner’s jail-time credit.

In May 2001, petitioner, who suffers severe physical and mental disabilities as a result of a traumatic brain injury, was convicted upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sodomy in the first degree. Petitioner requested that his sentencing be deferred so that he could receive treatment for his disabilities at an out-of-state private residential rehabilitation hospital. After a hearing, County Court (LaBuda, J.), issued an order granting petitioner’s request subject to a number of restrictions, which included releasing petitioner upon the posting of a bond by petitioner’s father consisting of the equity in the family residence and authorizing a family member to transport petitioner from the Sullivan County Jail to the hospital. Approximately 13 months later, petitioner was released from the hospital and returned to County Court, where he was sentenced to a five-year prison term in accordance with his plea agreement. In February 2004, petitioner requested that respondent certify the time he spent at the rehabilitation hospital as jail time pursuant to Penal Law § 70.30 (3). After petitioner’s request was denied, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Finding that petitioner had not been in custody as contemplated by Penal Law § 70.30 (3), Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.

We affirm. Respondent properly excluded the period of time that petitioner voluntarily spent at the private residential rehabilitation hospital from the computation of his jail-time credit *(see Matter of Poole v Koehler,*160 AD2d 880, 880 [1990]) since petitioner was on bail during this period of treatment and not in actual custody *(see Matter of Hawkins v Coughlin,*72 NY2d 158, 162-163 [1988]; *People ex rel. Fancher v Wasser,*244 AD2d 79, 81 [1998]; *Matter of Poole v Koehler, supra*at 880). Moreover, petitioner’s admission to the rehabilitation hospital was “not a condition imposed by County Court prior to sentencing, but rather was an accommodation for [his] benefit agreed to by the People and permitted by the court” *(People v Fortunato,*234 AD2d 713, 714 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 1035 [1997]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs. *[See*5 Misc 3d 598.]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

(18 U.S.C. 1350) 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of NovaDel Pharma Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Steven B. Ratoff, Chairman, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael E. Spicer, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,        respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| Date: March 30, 2009 | By:    | /s/ STEVEN B. RATOFF                                    |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Steven B. Ratoff                                        |
|                 |   | Chairman, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |   |                                                    |
| Date: March 30, 2009 | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL E. SPICER                                   |
|                 |   | Michael E. Spicer                                       |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer                                 |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
STATE v. SLOAN and Wooten.

No. 24A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2007.

Nora Henry Hargrove, for Sloan.

Norman Young, Jr., Thomas Meacham, Jr., Assistant Attorney Generals, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of May 2007 by Defendant (Wooten) to Deem Brief Timely Filed:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2007."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael D. Jordan, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 630]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), rendered March 12, 2004, as, upon his conviction of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, imposed a term of five years of post-release supervision.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

*908Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court did not violate Penal Law § 70.45 by imposing a post-release supervision term of five years for his conviction of assault in the second degree. Pursuant to Penal Law § 70.45 (2), the period of post-release supervision for a determinate sentence “shall be five years except that. . . such period shall be three years whenever a determinate sentence is imposed pursuant to . . . section 70.02 of this article upon a conviction for a class D or class E violent felony offense.” Although assault in the second degree is a class D violent felony, the defendant was adjudicated a second felony offender, and thus sentenced pursuant to Penal Law § 70.06 (6) rather than Penal Law § 70.02. Accordingly, the imposition of a five-year term of post-release supervision was required *(see People v Chestnut,*18 AD3d 965 [2005]; *People v Steadman,*308 AD2d 415 [2003]; *People v Bell,*305 AD2d 694 [2003]). Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 15.1

REVIEW REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of ICN
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2003 and the related
consolidated condensed statements of income and comprehensive income for each
of the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 and the
consolidated condensed statements of cash flow for the six-month
periods ended June 30,
2003 and 2002. These consolidated condensed interim financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which
is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed interim financial statements
for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.

We previously audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of December
31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in
our report dated March 6, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in
the consolidated condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2002, is fairly
stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet
from which it has been derived.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 4, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3664 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3664

To provide for the extension of a certain hydroelectric project located 
                     in the State of West Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 1 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the extension of a certain hydroelectric project located 
                     in the State of West Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the period specified in section 13 
of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project number 9042, the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in this Act as the 
``Commission'') shall, on the request of the licensee of that project, 
and in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public 
interest requirements of, the procedures of the Commission under, and 
other procedures specified in, that section, extend the deadline by 
which the licensee is required to commence construction of the project 
to December 6, 2009.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall take effect with respect 
to the project described in that subsection on expiration of the 
extension, issued by the Commission under section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the period for the commencement of 
construction of the project.
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If a license for the project 
described in subsection (a) expires before the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Commission shall--
            (1) reinstate the license, effective as of that date of 
        expiration; and
            (2) extend the deadline by which the licensee of the 
        project is required to commence construction of the project to 
        December 6, 2009.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF LICENSE PERIOD.

    Notwithstanding the period of a license specified in section 6 of 
the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 799) that would otherwise apply to the 
project described in section 1(a), the Commission shall, on the request 
of the licensee of that project, and in accordance with such terms and 
conditions of that Act (16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.) and the Commission as 
are applicable to the project and the license, extend the period of the 
license to 60 years, as calculated beginning on the date identified in 
the original order of the Commission issuing the license for the 
project.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Eugene Ricky PULLEY.

No. 619P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

C. Scott Holmes, Durham, for Pulley.

Jill Ledford Cheek, Special Deputy Attorney General, Joel H. Brewer, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*376Prior report: 180 N.C.App. 54, 636 S.E.2d 231.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of December 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
Exhibit 10.2

August 1, 2006

Dr. Zhongmin WeiVP of Reseach and CSOEden Bioscience
Corporation

Dear Zhongmin:

You
are an at-will employee of Eden Bioscience Corporation and your
employment can be terminated with or without cause at any time at the option of
Eden Bioscience or yourself. If your employment is terminated at the option of
the Company, your current base salary will be continued for a period of six (6)
months, provided that the termination is not based upon fraud, criminal activity
or breach of fiduciary duties. The six months severance will be paid in the
regular course of the companys payroll and will be subject to your normal
deductions. This severance agreement will terminate on July 31, 2007.

Yours truly,

/s/ Rhett Atkins

Rhett AtkinsPresident
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
SYNAPTX WORLDWIDE, INC. FORM 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 1998, 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                             127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      957
<ALLOWANCES>                                        38
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,090
<PP&E>                                             463
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (162)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                         460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,357
<SALES>                                          5,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,798
<CGS>                                            4,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  64
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,158)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.57)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023045EN.01002301.xml

| 6.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/23

---

Action brought on 10 December 2022 — Fibrecycle v EUIPO (BACK-2-NATURE)

(Case T-772/22)

(2023/C 45/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fibrecycle Pty Ltd (Helensvale, Australia) (represented by: T. Stein, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark BACK-2-NATURE — Application for registration No 1 485 655

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2022 in Case R 1699/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
In re Mark H. BADGETT.

No. 173A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 20, 2007.

Paul R. Ross, Executive Secretary, James J. Coman, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for Judicial Standards Commission.

J. Clark Fischer, Winston-Salem, Edward L. Powell, for Badgett.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of December 2007 by Petitioner for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Petitioner shall have up to and including the 28th day of January *3732008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 20th day of December 2007."
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Lauren P. Silvernail, hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.



|                     |  |                                                                                          
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 2, 2007 |  | /s/ Lauren P. Silvernail                                                                 
|                     |  | Lauren P. Silvernail                                                                     
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer & Vice President, Corporate Development