alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3717 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow reimbursement from 

flexible spending accounts for certain dental products. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2008 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow reimbursement from flexible spending accounts for certain 

dental products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dental Health Pro5 motion Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REIMBURSEMENT FROM FLEXIBLE SPENDING AC7 COUNTS FOR CERTAIN DENTAL PRODUCTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 106 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to contributions by employer 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 3717 IS

1 to accident and health plans) is amended by adding at the 

2 end the following new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(f) DENTAL CARE PRODUCTS UNDER FLEXIBLE

4 SPENDING ARRANGEMENT.—An arrangement shall not 

5 fail to be treated as a health flexible spending arrange6 ment under this section or section 105 merely because 

7 such arrangement provides reimbursement for products 

8 used to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent the 

9 onset of tooth decay (caries), periodontal diseases, and 

10 conditions ailing the teeth, gums, and mouth, or affecting 

11 the proper function thereof, for which reimbursement 

12 without regard to this subsection would not otherwise be 

13 allowable.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to plan years beginning after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# Commission Implementing Decision of 16 June 2014 amending Council Directive 2002/56/EC as regards the date laid down in Article            21(3) until which Member States are authorised to extend the validity of decisions concerning equivalence of seed potatoes            from third countries (notified under document C(2014) 3877) (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/367/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 16 June 2014

# amending Council Directive 2002/56/EC as regards the date laid down in Article 21(3) until which Member States are authorised                        to extend the validity of decisions concerning equivalence of seed potatoes from third countries                     

# *(notified under document C(2014) 3877)*

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2014/367/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 2002/56/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed potatoes(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 21(3) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Directive 2002/56/EC provides that, with effect from certain dates, Member States may no longer determine for themselves the                              equivalence of seed potatoes harvested in third countries with seed potatoes harvested within the Union and complying with                              that Directive.

(2)However, as work to establish a Union equivalence for seed potatoes from all the third countries concerned had not been completed,                              Directive 2002/56/EC permitted Member States to extend until 31 March 2014 the validity of equivalence decisions which they                              had already taken for seed potatoes from certain third countries not covered by a Union equivalence. This date was chosen                              by reference to the end of the period where seed potatoes are placed on the market.

(3)Since this work still has not been completed and a new marketing season will start by the end of the year 2014, it is necessary                              to authorise Member States to extend the validity of their national equivalence decisions.

(4)Directive 2002/56/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(5)The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating                              Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

In the first subparagraph of Article 21(3) of Directive 2002/56/EC, ‘31 March 2014’ is replaced by ‘31 March 2017’.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 June 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

Tonio Borg                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

1

OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 60.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 
30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000930406
<NAME> MVE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          2,548 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  32,631 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (989) 
<INVENTORY>                                    28,752 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               69,161       
<PP&E>                                         43,783      
<DEPRECIATION>                               (13,958)    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                177,698      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          36,526    
<BONDS>                                       141,680  
<COMMON>                                            1 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                    (6,129)       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  177,698         
<SALES>                                        47,491          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0          
<CGS>                                          33,834          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,773       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,211       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (131)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (196)      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    (196) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Stallworth, Appellant.

[802 NYS2d 817]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), entered December 20, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s conten*1413tion, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Also contrary to the contention of defendant, he was not denied a fair trial based upon comments made by the prosecutor during summation. Supreme Court instructed the jury to disregard the prosecutor’s statement that a prosecution witness “will not get any deal” on a pending charge, thereby alleviating any prejudice arising from the prosecutor’s improper reference to a matter not in evidence *(see generally People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105, 111 [1976]; *People v Clark,*195 AD2d 988, 991 [1993]). The remainder of the prosecutor’s summation was a fair response to defense counsel’s summation and “did not exceed the bounds of legitimate advocacy” *(People v Melendez,*11 AD3d 983, 984 [2004] , *lv denied*4 NY3d 888 [2005]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
IN RE M.S.C.

No. COA07-1058.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Gaston (02JT25).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
LEONARD v. TANT.

No. COA06-1256.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Onslow (04CVS3559).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Официален вестник C 321A/11 с

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 321A |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 6111 септември 2018 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 321A

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 6111 септември 2018 г.

---

| Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- |
| | Поправки |
| 2018/C 321 A/01 | Поправка на Обявление за конкурс на общо основание — EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 — Въоръжени служители по сигурността и охраната (SC 1/SC 2) ( ОВ C 305 A, 30.8.2018 г. ) | 1 |

Съдържание

Страница

Поправки

2018/C 321 A/01

Поправка на Обявление за конкурс на общо основание — EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 — Въоръжени служители по сигурността и охраната (SC 1/SC 2) ( ОВ C 305 A, 30.8.2018 г. )

( ОВ C 305 A, 30.8.2018 г. )

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

Поправки

| 11.9.2018 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CA 321/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2018

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CA 321/1

---

Поправка на Обявление за конкурс на общо основание — EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 — Въоръжени служители по сигурността и охраната (SC 1/SC 2)

(
  Официален вестник на Европейския съюз С 305 А от 30 август 2018 г.
  )

(2018/C 321 A/01)

На страница 8, в приложение II

| вместо: | „1. | Професионален опит от най-малко 3 години, натрупан през последните 6 години в областта на въоръжената охрана/намеса в рамките на държавни, национални и/или международни служби по опазване на обществената сигурност, включително в рамките на частни охранителни дружества, предоставящи услуги за международни публични организации, постоянни представителства или дипломатически мисии. За да бъде взет предвид този професионален опит, той трябва да бъде в допълнение към професионалния опит, изискван за достъп до конкурса;“ |
| --- | --- | --- |

вместо:

„1.

Професионален опит от най-малко 3 години, натрупан през последните 6 години в областта на въоръжената охрана/намеса в рамките на държавни, национални и/или международни служби по опазване на обществената сигурност, включително в рамките на частни охранителни дружества, предоставящи услуги за международни публични организации, постоянни представителства или дипломатически мисии. За да бъде взет предвид този професионален опит, той трябва да бъде в допълнение към професионалния опит, изискван за достъп до конкурса;“

| да се чете: | „1. | Професионален опит от най-малко 3 години, натрупан през последните 8 години в областта на въоръжената охрана/намеса в рамките на държавни, национални и/или международни служби по опазване на обществената сигурност. За да бъде взет предвид този професионален опит, той трябва да бъде в допълнение към професионалния опит, изискван за достъп до конкурса;“. |
| --- | --- | --- |

да се чете:

„1.

Професионален опит от най-малко 3 години, натрупан през последните 8 години в областта на въоръжената охрана/намеса в рамките на държавни, национални и/или международни служби по опазване на обществената сигурност. За да бъде взет предвид този професионален опит, той трябва да бъде в допълнение към професионалния опит, изискван за достъп до конкурса;“.

---
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 236/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 236/2013 of 15 March 2013 fixing the amount of private storage aid for certain            fishery products in the 2013 fishing year         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 236/2013                     

# of 15 March 2013

# fixing the amount of private storage aid for certain fishery products in the 2013 fishing year

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery                           and aquaculture products(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2813/2000 of 21 December 2000 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 as regards the grant of private storage aid for certain fishery products(2), and in particular Article 1 thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Private storage aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Union during the fishing year                              preceding the year in question.

(2)To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should                              be paid in one single instalment.

(3)In order not to hinder the operation of the intervention system in the year 2013, this Regulation should apply retroactively                              from 1 January 2013.

(4)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Committee established by Regulation (EC) No 104/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

For the 2013 fishing year the amount of private storage aid, referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, for                     the products listed in Annex II to that Regulation shall be as follows:                  
          -  first month: EUR 224 per tonne; 
          -  second month: EUR 0 per tonne. 

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

It shall apply from 1 January 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 March 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 326, 22.12.2000, p. 30.
Curtis L. SANGSTER v. The Honorable W. Osmond SMITH, III, Senior Resident Judge of Caswell County.

No. 182P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 24, 2008.

Curtis Sangster, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.

*557*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 16th day of April 2008 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Caswell County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 24th day of April 2008."
CLARK v. UNITED EMERGENCY SERVICES, INC.

No. COA07-592.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from Durham (06CVS05049).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Ronald S. Boreta, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of All-American
SportPark, Inc.;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

         a)  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 12, 2003



/s/ Ronald S. Boreta
Ronald S. Boreta
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power
      Trust IV (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.








/s/
      Randall D.
      Holmes


Name:
            Randall
                D. HolmesTitle:
            Chief
                Executive OfficerDate:
            November
                27, 2007














/s/
      Jeffrey H.
      Strasberg


Name:
            Jeffrey
                H. StrasbergTitle:
            Executive
                Vice President andChief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            November
                27, 2007
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name                                                                               Jurisdiction of organization
----                                                                               ----------------------------
<S>                                                                                <C>
Airborne Gear & Mach. Ltd. ...................................................     Canada
Ajax Manufacturing Company ...................................................     New Jersey
Atelier D'Usinage Arell Ltee [Arell Machining Ltd.] ..........................     Quebec
Barclay Investments, Inc. ....................................................     New Jersey
Cabore Resources, Inc. .......................................................     Delaware
Clayfort Industries, Inc. ....................................................     Delaware
CPS Enterprises, Inc. ........................................................     Missouri
CPS Trailer Co. ..............................................................     Missouri
Critical Components Corporation ..............................................     Delaware
Denore Resources S.R.L. de C.V. ..............................................     Mexico
Gendow Consulting Services Ltd. ..............................................     Canada
Haile Industries, Inc. .......................................................     Delaware
Kylan Industries, Inc. .......................................................     Delaware
Mecox Resources S.A. de C.V. .................................................     Mexico
Noray Resources, Inc. ........................................................     Delaware
PGI Acquisition Inc. .........................................................     Delaware
R & S Truck Body Company, Inc. ...............................................     Kentucky
Ranor, Inc. ..................................................................     Delaware
The Providence Group Inc. ....................................................     Delaware
Wyner Resources, Inc. ........................................................     Delaware
</TABLE>
ANDERSON v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES/WHITAKER SCHOOL.

No. COA07-463.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 18, 2007.

Certification Date January 7, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (06CVS4395).

Decision without published opinion. Remanded.
STATE of North Carolina v. Zerick Andrey JONES.

No. 318P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 9, 2008.

Zerick Andrey Jones, Pro Se.

*88Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 7th day of July 2008 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, New Hanover County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of July 2008."
BROADHURST v. TATUM.

No. COA07-696.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from Moore (06CVS1603).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.