Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 52285 

needed to administer the program 

authorized by these regulations are not 

subject to review by OMB under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act. 

Executive Order 12612 

This rule does not have sufficient 

Federalism implications to warrant the 

preparation of a Federalism Assessment. 

The provisions contained in this rule 

will not have substantial direct effect on 

States or their political subdivisions or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

Federal Assistance Programs 

The title and number of the Federal 

assistance program found in the Catalog 

of Federal Domestic Assistance to which 

this final rule applies are Commodity 

Loans and Loan Deficiency Payments, 

10.051. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1405 

Agricultural commodities, Feed 

grains, Grains, Loan programs—

agriculture, Oilseeds, Price support 

programs, Reporting and record keeping 

requirements. 

■ Accordingly, 7 CFR part 1405 is 

amended as follows: 

PART 1405—LOANS, PURCHASES, 

AND OTHER OPERATIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 1405 

is revised to read as follows: 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1515; 7 U.S.C. 7991(e); 

15 U.S.C. 714b and 714c; and Public Law 

108–470. 

■ 2. Add § 1405.9 to read as follows: 

§ 1405.9 Commodity assessments. 

(a) CCC will deduct from the proceeds 

of a marketing assistance loan an 

amount equal to the amount of an 

assessment otherwise required to be 

remitted to a State agency under a State 

statute by the producer of the 

commodity pledged as collateral for 

such loan or by the first purchaser of 

such commodity subject to the 

requirements of paragraph (b) of this 

section. 

(1) The assessment will be collected 

in one of the following ways, as 

requested by the State, but not both: 

(i) When the proceeds of the loan are 

disbursed; or 

(ii) When the commodity pledged as 

collateral for the loan is forfeited to 

CCC, in which case CCC will collect 

from the producer the amount of the 

assessment submitted by CCC to the 

State. 

(2) CCC will deduct from the proceeds 

of a marketing assistance loan an 

amount equal to the amount of an 

assessment otherwise authorized to be 

remitted to a federally authorized entity 

under a Federal statute by the producer 

of the commodity pledged as collateral 

for such loan or the first purchaser of 

such commodity in the manner agreed 

to by CCC and the entity to whom the 

Secretary of Agriculture has authorized 

to collect such assessments. 

(b) CCC will collect commodity 

assessments authorized under a State 

statute when: 

(1) The State entity has: 

(i) Requested that the assessment be 

collected; 

(ii) Identified whether the assessment 

is to be collected at the time the loan 

proceeds are disbursed or at the time the 

commodity is forfeited to CCC; 

(iii) Identified the person who may 

enter into an agreement with CCC that 

sets forth the obligations of the State 

and CCC with respect to the collection 

of the assessment; and 

(iv) Provided an opinion from the 

Office of the Attorney General to CCC 

that concludes the person signing the 

agreement may obligate the State to 

comply with the agreement and the 

provisions of Public Law 108–470 have 

been met. 

(2) The agreement described in 

paragraph (c) of this section has been 

executed by the appropriate State 

official and CCC. 

(c) CCC will enter into an agreement 

with an authorized State official to 

collect commodity assessments when 

the actions set forth in paragraphs (b)(1) 

and (2) of this section have been 

completed. Such agreement will contain 

the obligations and responsibilities of 

the State and CCC. All such agreements 

will include provisions that provide: 

(1) The State will indemnify CCC for 

any costs incurred in the collection of 

the assessment including costs incurred 

with respect to resolution of disputes 

arising from the requested collection of 

the assessment and for administrative 

costs incurred by CCC in the collection 

of the assessment; 

(2) The State, in cases where an 

assessment has been collected two or 

more times with respect to the same 

quantity of the commodity subject to the 

assessment, will refund the amount of 

the excess collection to the producer. 

(3) The agreement may be terminated 

by either party upon 30 days notice. 

(4) The State, in cases where the 

marketing assistance loan is made by a 

cooperative marketing association or a 

designated marketing association 

approved by CCC, or any other similar 

entity that is approved by CCC, to obtain 

such a loan on behalf of its members 

may enter into individual arrangements 

with such entity to facilitate the 

collection of the assessment with the 

approval of CCC. 

Signed in Washington, DC, on August 17, 

2005. 

James R. Little, 

Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. 05–17500 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2004–19536; Directorate 

Identifier 2004–NM–86–AD; Amendment 39–

14247; AD 2005–18–07] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell 

Douglas Model DC–8–11, DC–8–12, 

DC–8–21, DC–8–31, DC–8–32, DC–8–

33, DC–8–41, DC–8–42, and DC–8–43 

Airplanes; DC–8–50 Series Airplanes; 

DC–8F–54 and DC–8F–55 Airplanes; 

DC–8–60 Series Airplanes; DC–8–60F 

Series Airplanes; DC–8–70 Series 

Airplanes; and DC–8–70F Series 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an 

existing airworthiness directive (AD), 

which applies to certain McDonnell 

Douglas transport category airplanes. 

That AD currently requires repetitive 

inspections for cracking of the lower 

cargo doorjamb corners, and corrective 

action if necessary. That AD provides 

for optional terminating action for 

certain repetitive inspections for certain 

airplanes. For certain other airplanes, 

that AD requires modification of the 

lower cargo doorjamb corners. This new 

AD adds airplanes to the applicability. 

The existing AD was prompted by 

reports of fatigue cracks in the fuselage 

skin in the lower cargo doorjamb 

corners; this AD is prompted by the 

inadvertent omission of certain 

airplanes from the existing applicability. 

We are issuing this AD to ensure that 

the unsafe condition will be addressed 

on all affected airplanes so that cracking 

in the lower cargo doorjamb corners is 

detected and corrected before it can 

result in rapid decompression of the 

fuselage and consequent reduced 

structural integrity of the airplane. 

DATES: Effective October 7, 2005. 

On April 29, 2004 (69 FR 15234, 

March 25, 2004), the Director of the 

52286 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

Federal Register approved the 

incorporation by reference of 

McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 

DC8–53–078, Revision 01, dated January 

25, 2001. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility, U.S. Department 

of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street 

SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, 

Washington, DC. 

Contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 

Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, 

California 90846, Attention: Data and 

Service Management, Dept. C1–L5A 

(D800–0024), for service information 

identified in this AD. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon 

Mowery, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe 

Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los Angeles 

Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 

Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, 

California 90712–4137; telephone (562) 

627–5322; fax (562) 627–5210. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Examining the Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov or in 

person at the Docket Management 

Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The Docket 

Management Facility office (telephone 

(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza 

level of the Nassif Building at the street 

address stated in the ADDRESSES section. 

Discussion 

The FAA issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that 

supersedes AD 2004–06–06, amendment 

39–13532 (69 FR 15234, March 25, 

2004). The existing AD applies to 

certain McDonnell Douglas transport 

category airplanes. That NPRM was 

published in the Federal Register on 

November 5, 2004 (69 FR 64523). That 

NPRM proposed to add new airplanes to 

the applicability of AD 2004–06–06, and 

retained the requirements for repetitive 

inspections for cracking of the lower 

cargo doorjamb corners, and corrective 

action if necessary. That NPRM also 

retained the provision for optional 

terminating action for certain repetitive 

inspections for certain airplanes. For 

certain other airplanes, that NPRM 

retained the requirement to modify the 

lower cargo doorjamb corners. 

Comments 

We provided the public the 

opportunity to participate in the 

development of this AD. We have 

considered the comments that have 

been received on the NPRM. 

Request To Remove the Reporting 

Requirements 

Two commenters request that the 

reporting requirements be removed from 

the NPRM. One commenter requests 

that, if the reporting requirements must 

be retained, the compliance time to 

report (within 10 days of the inspection) 

be extended to 30 days. One commenter 

states that the reporting of negative 

findings would provide very little useful 

information while imposing additional 

workload and cost to the operators and 

to the FAA. The other commenter also 

notes that similar ADs requiring 

inspections on principal structural 

elements on door corners do not 

mandate reporting requirements. 

We agree with the commenter for the 

reasons stated, and have removed the 

reporting requirements from this AD. 

Changes to Delegation Authority 

Boeing has received a Delegation 

Option Authorization (DOA). We have 

revised this final rule to delegate the 

authority to approve an alternative 

method of compliance for any repair 

required by this AD to the Authorized 

Representative for the Boeing DOA 

Organization rather than the Designated 

Engineering Representative (DER). 

Explanation of Change to the 

Applicability 

We have specified model designations 

in the applicability of this AD as 

published in the most recent type 

certificate data sheet for the affected 

models. 

Conclusion 

We have carefully reviewed the 

available data, including the comments 

that have been received, and determined 

that air safety and the public interest 

require adopting the AD with the 

changes described previously. We have 

determined that these changes will 

neither increase the economic burden 

on any operator nor increase the scope 

of the AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

This AD affects about 264 airplanes 

worldwide. The following table 

provides the estimated costs for U.S. 

operators to comply with this AD, 

which adds no economic burden above 

that imposed by AD 2004–06–06. The 

current costs for this AD are repeated for 

the convenience of affected operators, as 

follows: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Work hours 

Average 

labor rate 

per hour 

Parts Cost per airplane 

Number of affected U.S.-registered airplanes 

Fleet cost 

Pre-modification inspections ................ 24 $65 None required .. $1,560, per inspection cycle.Unknown ........... Unknown. 

Modification .......................................... 520 65 $25,000 ............ $58,800 ............ Unknown ........... Unknown. 

Post-modification inspections .............. 40 65 None required ... $2,600, per inspection cycle.244 ................... $634,400, per 

inspection 

cycle. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in subtitle VII, 

part A, subpart III, section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 52287 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

(3) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

See the ADDRESSES section for a location 

to examine the regulatory evaluation. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 

by removing amendment 39–13532 (69 

FR 15234, March 25, 2004) and by 

adding the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2005–18–07 McDonnell Douglas: 

Amendment 39–14247. Docket No. 

FAA–2004–19536; Directorate Identifier 

2004–NM–86–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This AD becomes effective October 7, 

2005. 

Affected ADs 

(b) This AD supersedes AD 2004–06–06, 

amendment 39–13532. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to the following 

McDonnell Douglas airplanes, certificated in 

any category; as listed in McDonnell Douglas 

Service Bulletin DC8–53–078, Revision 01, 

dated January 25, 2001: 

(1) Model DC–8–11, DC–8–12, DC–8–21, 

DC–8–31, DC–8–32, DC–8–33, DC–8–41, DC–

8–42, and DC–8–43 airplanes; 

(2) Model DC–8–51, DC–8–52, DC–8–53, 

and DC–8–55 airplanes; 

(3) Model DC–8F–54 and DC–8F–55 

airplanes; 

(4) Model DC–8–61, DC–8–62, and DC–8–

63 airplanes; 

(5) Model DC–8–61F, DC–8–62F, and DC–

8–63F airplanes; 

(6) Model DC–8–71, DC–8–72, and DC–8–

73 airplanes; and 

(7) Model DC–8–71F, DC–8–72F, and DC–

8–73F airplanes. 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This AD was prompted by reports of 

fatigue cracks in the fuselage skin in the 

lower cargo doorjamb corners. We are issuing 

this AD to detect and correct cracking in the 

lower cargo doorjamb corners, which could 

result in rapid decompression of the fuselage 

and consequent reduced structural integrity 

of the airplane. 

Compliance 

(e) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2004– 

06–06 

Note 1: This AD is related to AD 93–01–

15, amendment 39–8469, and will affect 

Principal Structural Elements (PSEs) 

53.08.042 and 53.08.043 of the DC–8 

Supplemental Inspection Document (SID), 

Report L26–011, Volume II, Revision 7, dated 

April 1993. 

Group 1 Airplanes: Inspections and Optional 

Terminating Action 

(f) Except as provided by paragraph (l) of 

this AD: For airplanes identified as Group 1 

in McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC8–

53–078, Revision 01, dated January 25, 2001: 

(1) Within 2,000 landings or 3 years after 

April 29, 2004 (the effective date of AD 

2004–06–06, amendment 39–13532), 

whichever occurs first, perform applicable 

inspections for cracking of the lower cargo 

doorjamb corners, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the service 

bulletin. 

(i) If no crack is detected during any 

inspection required by this paragraph: Repeat 

the inspections within the intervals specified 

in paragraph 1.E. of the service bulletin. 

(ii) If any crack is detected during any 

inspection required by this paragraph: Repair 

before further flight in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the service 

bulletin. 

(2) Modification of the lower cargo 

doorjamb corners in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the service 

bulletin terminates the repetitive inspection 

requirement of paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD. 

(3) For airplanes repaired or modified in 

accordance with paragraph (f)(1)(ii) or (f)(2) 

of this AD: Within 17,000 landings after the 

repair or modification, perform an eddy 

current inspection for cracks of the doorjamb 

corners, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the service 

bulletin (Drawing SN08530001). Repeat the 

inspection at intervals not to exceed 4,400 

landings. 

Group 2 Airplanes: Modification 

(g) Except as provided by paragraph (l) of 

this AD, for airplanes identified as Group 2 

in McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC8–

53–078, Revision 01, dated January 25, 2001: 

(1) Within 2,000 landings or 3 years after 

April 29, 2004, whichever occurs first, 

modify the lower cargo doorjamb corners in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of the service bulletin. 

(2) Within 17,000 landings after the 

modification required by paragraph (g)(1) of 

this AD, perform applicable inspections for 

cracking of the doorjamb corners, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of the service bulletin. Repeat 

the inspections at intervals not to exceed 

4,400 landings. 

Group 3 and Group 4 Airplanes: Inspections 

(h) For airplanes identified as Group 3 and 

Group 4 in McDonnell Douglas Service 

Bulletin DC8–53–078, Revision 01, dated 

January 25, 2001: Within 17,000 landings 

following accomplishment of the 

modification specified in the service bulletin, 

perform applicable inspections for cracking 

of the lower cargo doorjamb corners, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of the service bulletin. Repeat 

the inspections at intervals not to exceed 

4,400 landings. 

All Airplanes: Repair Following PostModification Inspections 

(i) If any cracking is detected during any 

inspection required by paragraph (f)(3), (g)(2), 

or (h) of this AD: Repair before further flight 

in accordance with a method approved by 

the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or per data 

meeting the type certification basis of the 

airplane approved by an Authorized 

Representative for the Boeing Delegation 

Option Authorization Organization who has 

been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

Credit for Prior Accomplishment 

(j) Inspections done before the effective 

date of April 29, 2004, in accordance with 

McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC8–

53–078, dated February 6, 1996, are 

acceptable for compliance with the 

applicable inspections required by this AD. 

(k) Inspections and repairs specified in this 

AD of areas of PSEs 53.08.042 and 53.08.043 

are acceptable for compliance with the 

applicable requirements of paragraphs (a) 

and (b) of AD 93–01–15. The remaining areas 

of the affected PSEs must be inspected and 

repaired as applicable, in accordance with 

AD 93–01–15. 

Requirements for Newly Added Airplanes 

(l) For airplanes not subject to the 

requirements of AD 2004–06–06, the 

reference time for compliance is the effective 

date of this new AD, rather than April 29, 

2004 (the effective date of AD 2004–06–06). 

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) 

(m)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft 

Certification (ACO), Transport Airplane 

52288 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in 

accordance with the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. 

(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD, if it is approved by an 

Authorized Representative for the Boeing 

Delegation Option Authorization 

Organization who has been authorized by the 

Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those 

findings. For a repair method to be approved, 

the repair must meet the certification basis of 

the airplane, and the approval must 

specifically refer to this AD. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(n) You must use McDonnell Douglas 

Service Bulletin DC8–53–078, Revision 01, 

dated January 25, 2001, to perform the 

actions that are required by this AD, unless 

the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of 

the Federal Register previously approved the 

incorporation by reference of this document 

as of April 29, 2004 (69 FR 15234, March 25, 

2004). Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, 

Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood 

Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, 

Attention: Data and Service Management, 

Dept. C1–L5A (D800–0024), for a copy of this 

service information. You may review copies 

at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh 

Street, SW., room PL–401, Nassif Building, 

Washington, DC; on the Internet at http:// 

dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030, 

or go to http://www.archives.gov/ 

federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 

24, 2005. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–17401 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–20387; Airspace 

Docket No. 05–ANM–2] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Amendment to VOR Federal Airway 

V–536; MT 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action modifies Federal 

Airway V–536 by adding a route from 

the Great Falls, MT, Very High 

Frequency Omnidirectional Range/ 

Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) to 

the SWEDD intersection. The purpose of 

this airway segment is to enhance the 

management of aircraft transiting 

between Great Falls, MT, and Bozeman, 

MT. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, October 27, 

2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken 

McElroy, Airspace and Rules, Office of 

System Operations Airspace and AIM, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 

267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On May 25, 2005, the FAA published 

in the Federal Register a notice 

proposing to amend V–536 by extending 

the airway from the Great Falls 

VORTAC, to the SWEDD intersection 

(70 FR 30035). Interested parties were 

invited to participate in this rulemaking 

effort by submitting written comments 

on the proposal. No comments were 

received. With the exception of editorial 

changes, this amendment is the same as 

that proposed in the notice. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to 

modify V–536 by adding a segment from 

the Great Falls, MT, VORTAC to the 

SWEDD intersection. The purpose of 

this airway segment is to enhance the 

management of aircraft transiting 

between Great Falls, MT, and Bozeman, 

MT. 

Domestic VOR Federal airways are 

published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA 

Order 7400.9N dated September 1, 2005, 

and effective September 16, 2005, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The domestic VOR Federal airway 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9N, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated September 1, 2005, and 

effective September 16, 2005, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal 

Airways. 

* * * * * 

V–536 [Revised] 

From North Bend, OR; INT North Bend 

023° and Corvallis, OR, 235° radials; 

Corvallis; Deschutes, OR; 32 miles, 58 miles, 

71 MSL, Pendleton, OR; Walla Walla, WA; 

Pullman, WA; 27 miles, 85 MSL, Mullan 

Pass, ID; 5 miles, 34 miles, 95 MSL, Kalispell, 

MT; 20 miles, 41 miles, 115 MSL, Great Falls, 

MT. INT Great Falls 185° and Bozeman, MT 

338° radials; Bozeman, From Sheridan, WY; 

Gillette, WY; New Castle, WY; to Rapid City, 

SD. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, August 24, 

2005. 

Edith V. Parish, 

Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules. 

[FR Doc. 05–17208 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 97 

[Docket No. 30455; Amdt. No. 3130] 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures, Weather Takeoff 

Minimums; Miscellaneous 

Amendments 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT.