alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 169 (Thursday, September 1, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52051-52052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17377]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-102144-04]
RIN 1545-BD10


Dual Consolidated Loss Regulations; Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document cancels a public hearing on proposed regulations 
under section 1503(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) regarding 
dual consolidated losses.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for September 7, 2005, 
at 10 a.m., is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin R. Jones of the Publications and 
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel 
(Procedure and Administration) at (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free 
number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing that appeared in the Federal Register on Tuesday, May 
24, 2005 (70 FR 29868) announced that a public hearing was scheduled 
for September 7, 2005, at 10 a.m., in the IRS Auditorium, Internal 
Revenue Service

[[Page 52052]]

Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of 
the public hearing is under section 1503(d) of the Internal Revenue 
Code. The public comment period for these regulations expired on August 
17, 2005.
    The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, 
instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to 
submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. 
As of Wednesday, August 24, 2005, no one has requested to speak. 
Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for September 7, 2005, is 
cancelled.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 05-17377 Filed 8-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1339/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1339/2014 of 16 December 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1339/2014                     

# of 16 December 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
EXHIBIT 31.02**CERTIFICATION**I, Gregory T. Donovan, Senior Vice President of Accounting and Finance of Campbell & Company, Inc.,the managing operator of The Campbell Fund Trust. (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, cash flows and financial highlights of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By:  /s/ Gregory T. Donovan    Gregory T. Donovan    Senior Vice President of Accounting and Finance    March 31, 2008  
E 3
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.3

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Trustees and Shareholders
ElderTrust:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-80719) on Form S-8 (for the 9998 Share Option and Incentive Plan), and the
registration statement (No. 333-80717) on Form S-8 (for 1999 Share Option and
Incentive Plan) of our report dated February 2, 2001, related to the
consolidated balance sheets of ElderTrust and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2000 and 1999 and that related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and cash flow for the years ended December 31, 2000 and
1999 and the period from January 30, 1998 to December 31, 1998 and all related
financial statement schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 2000,
annual report on Form 10-K of ElderTrust.



                                                             /s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
April 6, 2001
STATE v. GREEN.

No. COA07-1256.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Henderson (07CR51393, 07CR51415).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 664/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 664/2013 of 11 July 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 664/2013                     

# of 11 July 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
on Form S-8/S-3 (File No. 333-81755) of Covad Communications Group, Inc.,
relating to the 1997 Stock Plan and the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of
our reports dated March 30, 2000 on the financial statements of Covad
Communications Group, Inc., which reports appear in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Covad Communications Group, Inc., for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1999.

                                                               Ernst & Young LLP

Walnut Creek, California
March 20, 2000
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7977

LEROYAL GRAHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GREENRY A. NEAL, Powhatan County Sheriff; HELEN F. FAHEY, VA Parole Board (Chair); GENE JOHNSON, Director Department of Correction,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00289-JBF-JEB)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

LeRoyal Graham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

LeRoyal Graham appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Graham v. Fahey , No. 2:08-cv-00289-JBFJEB (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Charles Thomas, Appellant, v Fall Creek Contractors, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[800 NYS2d 559]

*757Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered January 14, 2004, insofar as it denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) claims, unanimously modified, on the law and upon a search of the record, to dismiss the Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) claims, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

This Court is empowered to grant defendants’ respective cross motions for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) claims even in the absence of a cross appeal *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard,*61 NY2d 106, 110-111 [1984]).

The record establishes that the temporary wooden stairs from which plaintiff fell were still in the process of being constructed; that plaintiff, who was assisting in the construction of the stairs, was aware that they had not been bolted to the parapet wall when he decided to use them; that another nearby set of temporary stairs had been completed and affixed to the parapet wall and were being used by workers on the day of plaintiffs accident; and that the stairs from which plaintiff fell did not break when he fell, were not otherwise defective, and were mounted to the wall after the accident. Accordingly, plaintiff’s actions were “the sole cause of his injury, and he is therefore not entitled to recover under Labor Law § 240 (1)” *(Montgomery v Federal Express Corp.,*4 NY3d 805, 806 [2005]).

Plaintiffs Labor Law § 241 (6) claim originally relied on 12 NYCRR 23-1.21 (b) (4) (i), which requires, inter alia, that any portable ladder used as a regular means of access between different levels of a building or structure be nailed or otherwise securely fastened in place and “extend at least 36 inches above the upper floor, level or landing or handholds shall be provided at such upper levels.” The elevation risk here involved two adjoining roofs that differed in height by four to six feet and shared a parapet wall that was three- to four-feet high. Metal stairs bolted to the parapet wall connected the two roofs prior to the project, but had to be removed as part of the project. In his reply brief, plaintiff, while continuing to argue that the temporary stairs were a ladder within the meaning of this regulation, concedes that “it would make no sense to argue that the regulation’s provision requiring a three-foot extension past the upper surface is applicable here.” As plaintiff does not cite *758another regulation, this claim must also be dismissed *(see generally Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,*81 NY2d 494, 501-502 [1993]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Marlow, Sullivan and Catterson, JJ.
# C_2023271EN.01001601.xml

| 31.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2023 — LS v PL

(Case C-291/23, Hantoch (1))

(2023/C 271/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LS

Defendant: PL

Question referred

Must an interpretation of Article 10 of the EU Succession Regulation (2) with regard to the question whether any estate assets existed in the Member State of the court seised be based on the time of the succession or on the time when the action was filed?

---

(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession (OJ 2012 L 201, p. 107).

---
---

Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Active Power, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Clishem, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 1, 2011




/s/     JAMES A. CLISHEMJames A. Clishem

President and Chief Executive Officer
Unassociated Document








Exhibit 10.1


 


November 2, 2010








	
To: 

	
Mr. Ming Yang


Chairman


Gulf Resources, Inc.








 




Dear Mr. Yang:







Please accept this as my formal resignation from the board of Gulf Resources effective at the end of my current term on November 6th, 2010.







I wish you and the company continued success in the future and enjoyed working with you and the management at Gulf.







Sincerely;







Biagio Vignolo
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Transgenomic, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, I, Craig J. Tuttle, President and Chief Executive Officer of Transgenomic, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





(1)
such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Transgenomic, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Transgenomic, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transgenomic, Inc.





/s/     CRAIG J. TUTTLECraig J. TuttlePresident and Chief Executive Officer





Date: October 21, 2011




A signed original of the certification required by Section 906 has been provided to Transgenomic, Inc. and will be retained by Transgenomic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jerry B. GIBBLE.

No. 305P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Jerry B. Gibble, Pro Se.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, William David McFadyen, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th day of June 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."