alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the periodending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

/s/Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief FinancialOfficer and Director

March 15,2005

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Date

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WENDALL D. JONES

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00197

- CR

Appeal from the

226th Judicial District Court

o f Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2021

- CR

- 2720)

J U D G M E N T

T he Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance

.

IT IS SO OR DERED THIS 1 3 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024.

GINA M. PALAFOX

, Justice

Before Alley , C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7182

ALTONY BROOKS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SGT DAVENPORT; OFC LEDWELL; WARDEN STEVENSON; WARDEN SUTTON; CAPTAIN PACK; LIEUTENANT CARTER , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. ( 9:15

- cv
- 03195

- PMD )

Submitted : March 19, 2018 Decided: May 2, 2018

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion

.
Altony Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Altony Brooks appeals the district court’s order s accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge , granting summary judgment to defendants, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion to reconsider

. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversi ble error. Accordingly , we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court , Brooks v. Davenport , No. 9:15

- cv
- 03195

- PMD (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2016 & Aug. 4, 2017) , but modify the order granting summary judgment to reflect that dismissal
of all claims is without prejudice

. We deny Brooks’ motions to appoint counsel and to reconsider, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
# Europeiska unionens C 321A/11 s

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 321A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 61 årgången11 september 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 321A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

61 årgången11 september 2018

---

| Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- |
| | Rättelser |
| 2018/C 321 A/01 | Rättelse till meddelande om allmänt uttagningsprov – Epso/AST-SC/07/18 – Beväpnad säkerhets- och skyddspersonal (SC 1/SC 2) ( EUT C 305 A, 30.8.2018 ) | 1 |

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

Rättelser

2018/C 321 A/01

Rättelse till meddelande om allmänt uttagningsprov – Epso/AST-SC/07/18 – Beväpnad säkerhets- och skyddspersonal (SC 1/SC 2) ( EUT C 305 A, 30.8.2018 )

( EUT C 305 A, 30.8.2018 )

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

Rättelser

| 11.9.2018 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 321/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2018

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 321/1

---

Rättelse till meddelande om allmänt uttagningsprov – Epso/AST-SC/07/18 – Beväpnad säkerhets- och skyddspersonal (SC 1/SC 2)

(
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 305 A av den 30 augusti 2018
  )

(2018/C 321 A/01)

Sidan 8, bilaga II

| I stället för: | ”1. | Yrkeserfarenhet på minst 3 år som erhållits under de senaste 6 åren på området väpnat skydd/väpnade ingripanden inom statliga, nationella och/eller internationella offentliga säkerhetstjänster, inbegripet inom privata säkerhetsföretag som tillhandahåller tjänster för internationella offentliga organisationer, ständiga representationer eller diplomatiska beskickningar. För att denna yrkeserfarenhet ska beaktas får den inte räknas in i den erfarenhet som krävs för tillträde till uttagningsprovet.” |
| --- | --- | --- |

I stället för:

”1.

Yrkeserfarenhet på minst 3 år som erhållits under de senaste 6 åren på området väpnat skydd/väpnade ingripanden inom statliga, nationella och/eller internationella offentliga säkerhetstjänster, inbegripet inom privata säkerhetsföretag som tillhandahåller tjänster för internationella offentliga organisationer, ständiga representationer eller diplomatiska beskickningar. För att denna yrkeserfarenhet ska beaktas får den inte räknas in i den erfarenhet som krävs för tillträde till uttagningsprovet.”

| ska det stå: | ”1. | Yrkeserfarenhet på minst 3 år som erhållits under de senaste 8 åren på området väpnat skydd/väpnade ingripanden inom statliga, nationella och/eller internationella offentliga säkerhetstjänster. För att denna yrkeserfarenhet ska beaktas får den inte räknas in i den erfarenhet som krävs för tillträde till uttagningsprovet.” |
| --- | --- | --- |

ska det stå:

”1.

Yrkeserfarenhet på minst 3 år som erhållits under de senaste 8 åren på området väpnat skydd/väpnade ingripanden inom statliga, nationella och/eller internationella offentliga säkerhetstjänster. För att denna yrkeserfarenhet ska beaktas får den inte räknas in i den erfarenhet som krävs för tillträde till uttagningsprovet.”

---
STATE v. AUTERY.

No. COA07-714.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS56307).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# **Exhibit 32.1**

# ** **

# **OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the ChiefExecutive Officer of Western Sizzlin Corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies that the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 and thefinancial statements contained therein, fully comply with the requirements ofSections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q and the financial statements theretofairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of June 30, 2005, and the period then ended.

 

 
| /s/ James C. Verney |   | August 15, 2005 |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------|

 

----
WAKE CARES, INC., et al v. BOE, et al.

No. 230P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 22, 2008.

Ann Majestic, Raleigh, for Wake Co. BOE.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of May 2008 by Plaintiffs for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of May 2008."

MARTIN, J., recused.
**Exhibit 3(iii)**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**TICETECHNOLOGY, INC.**

 

Tice Technology, Inc. (the“Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, hereby certifies: 

 

(1) That, at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, resolutions were duly adopted containing the following proposed amendments to theCertificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendments to be advisable and calling a meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation for consideration thereof: 

 

Paragraph 1 of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Certificate of Amendment is amended to change thename of the Corporation and to read as follows: 

 

1. **Name**. The name of the Corporation is “Atmospheric Glow Technologies, Inc.” 

 

The first sentence of Paragraph 3 entitled “Classes of Shares” is amended to increase the number of authorized common shares andto read as follows: 

 

The total number of shares which theCorporation is authorized to issue is 415,600,000 shares of which 400,000,000 shares shall be designated “Common Shares;” 5,000,000 shall be designated “Class B Common Shares;” 600,000 shall be designated “Class D CommonShares;” and 10,000,000 shall be designated “Preferred Shares.” 

 

(2) That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with the General Corporation law of the stateof Delaware, at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendments. 

 

(3) That said amendments were duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Tice Technology, Inc. has caused thiscertificate to be signed by Charles R. West, its authorized officer, this 23rd day of February, 2004.
STATE of North Carolina v. Randall Homer BALLARD.

No. 168P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Randall H. Ballard, Pro Se.

Douglas W. Corkhill, Assistant Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 657 S.E.2d 447.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of April 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
STATE v. SHOFFNER.

No. COA08-120.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Durham (05CRS49407).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

d1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143628

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143628 COA: 304508 Barry CC: 10-100104-FH LONA JEAN ALDRICH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 2, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2023278EN.01001602.xml

| 7.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 278/16 |
| -------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 2 May 2023 — FB, JL v Procureur du Roi près du Tribunal de Première Instance d’Eupen (Case C-283/23, Marhon ( 1 )) (2023/C 278/25) Language of the case: French Referring court Cour de cassation Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: FB, JL Defendant: Procureur du Roi près du Tribunal de Première Instance d’Eupen Question referred Are Articles 1, 2(3) and 3 of Directive 2014/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of non-automatic weighing instruments ( 2 ) applicable to the use, by judicial or police authorities, of non-automatic weighing instruments for the purposes of determining the mass of vehicles for the application of national legislation or regulations, which are subject to criminal penalties, and which — such as (i) Articles 41(3)(1) and 43(3)(1) of the Law of 15 July 2013 on road haulage and implementing Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC ( 3 ) and implementing Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international road haulage market ( 4 ) and (ii) Articles 21, first paragraph, point 5 and 35(4) of the Royal Decree of 22 May 2014 on road haulage — prohibit the use on the road of vehicles whose measured mass exceeds the maximum authorised mass? ( 1 )  The name of this case is fictitious. It is not the name of any of the parties to the proceedings. ( 2 )  OJ 2014 L 96, p 107. ( 3 )  OJ 2009 L 300, p. 51. ( 4 )  OJ 2009 L 300, p. 72.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000930548
<NAME>                 RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          27,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  222,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,875
<PP&E>                                       2,369,426
<DEPRECIATION>                                (254,595)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,884,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,863
<BONDS>                                      1,425,414
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        112
<COMMON>                                           554
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,107,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,884,667
<SALES>                                        216,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,113
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,335
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,335
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,101
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                  Tekgraf, Inc.


                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                                                             DECEMBER 31,
                                                                           1998        1997
                                                                           ----        ----
         <S>                                                             <C>        <C>     
         Net income (loss)                                               $   91     $  (393)
         Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares
           Common shares                                                  5,889       2,581

         Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share                   $ 0.02      $(0.15)
</TABLE>
STATE v. Derrick D. BOGER.

No. 158P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of May 2008 by Defendant to Amend:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 866
          - [Docket No. 2003D-0221]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Final rule; technical amendment.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a final rule in the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 31, 2003 (68 FR 62007).  The final rule classified the endotoxin assay into class II (special controls).  The agency classified the device into class II (special controls) in order to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device.  FDA is amending the agency's regulations to redesignate the section number listed in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) from § 866.3610 to § 866.3210.                    

# DATES:

This rule is effective September 7, 2005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Freddie M. Poole, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-440), Food and Drug Administration, 2098 Gaither Rd., Rockville, MD 20850, 240-276-0496 ext. 1111.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

FDA has found that the endotoxin assay regulation does not reflect the correct section number listed in the CFR.  Accordingly, FDA is amending the regulation in § 866.3610 (21 CFR 866.3610) to correct the error by redesignating the section number from § 866.3610 to 866.3210.

# List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866

      - Biologics
      - Laboratories
      - Medical devices

Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 866 is amended as follows:

# PART 866—IMMUNOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES

1.  The authority citation for 21 CFR part 866 continues to read as follows:

Authority:21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.

§ 866.3610 

2.  Section 866.3610 is redesignated as § 866.3210. 

Dated: August 26, 2005.

Linda S. Kahan,

Deputy Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.

[FR Doc. 05-17645 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 919/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 919/2014 of 22 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 919/2014                     

# of 22 August 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.