alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 441/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 441/2014 of 30 April 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 laying down requirements            on data link services for the single European sky (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 441/2014                     

# of 30 April 2014

# amending Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 laying down requirements on data link services for the single European sky

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/310 of 26 February 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 29/2009 laying down requirements                                 on data link services for the single European sky and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 441/2014 Text with EEA relevance.
IN RE D.M.L.

No. COA07-574.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Wayne (04JT75, 04JT76).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. HASSOUMIOU.

No. COA08-87.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Guilford (06CRS74099).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, dismissed in part without prejudice.
STATE v. JAMES.

No. COA07-670.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Forsyth (05CRS63846, 05CRS42539).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
Order entered April 14, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 19
- 01548
- CV PURE GEN HOLDINGS, I NC., Appellant

V. NEORA, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 160th Judi cial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 19
- 10205

ORDER Before the Court is appellee’s April 10, 2020 unopposed second motion to extend time to file its opening brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to May 15, 2020

. We caution appellee that further extension requests in this accelerated appeal will be disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCrown Pacific Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Peter W. Stott, Director, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of thePartnership.

 
| /s/ Peter W. Stott                               |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Peter W. Stott                                   |
| Director, President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| Crown Pacific Partners,  L.P.                    |
| May 20, 2003                                     |

 

This certification is made solely for thepurpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. andwill be retained by Crown Pacific Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.3







[Rockwell Automation Letterhead]
July 1, 2016
Blake D. Moret
President  & Chief Executive Officer
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
1201 South Second Street
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204


Dear Mr. Moret:


This Letter Agreement will govern and reflect the arrangement approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors with respect to the clawback of certain compensation arrangements and profits from the sale of securities.  
If Rockwell Automation, Inc. (the “Company”) is required to restate any financial statements relating to periods from and after fiscal year 2016 during which you are chief executive officer of the Company due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, you hereby agree to reimburse the Company for:
		
	1.
	any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation received by you from the Company during the 12-month period following the first public issuance or filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement; and


		
	2.
	any profits realized by you from the sale of securities of the Company during that 12-month period.


You agree that the foregoing reimbursement will apply, without limitation, to any such bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation or profits under any agreement you may have entered into with the Company or under any Company plan, program or arrangement.
This Letter Agreement will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its conflicts of laws principles.  The undersigned parties irrevocably agree that the courts of the State of Delaware will have exclusive jurisdiction in relation to any claim, dispute or difference concerning this Letter Agreement and any matter arising therefrom.
Please confirm your agreement with the foregoing by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this Letter Agreement.  This Letter Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which is deemed an original but all of which together constitute one and the same instrument.
	
			
	 
	 
	Very truly yours,

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/    DOUGLAS M. HAGERMAN        

	 
	 
	Douglas M. Hagerman

	 
	 
	Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary




	
	
	Acknowledged and Agreed:

	 

	/s/ BLAKE D. MORET

	Blake D. Moret
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                             338
<SECURITIES>                                        12
<RECEIVABLES>                                      507
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,239
<PP&E>                                             751
<DEPRECIATION>                                     508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              662
<BONDS>                                             18
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,599
<SALES>                                          4,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,013
<CGS>                                            3,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    266
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       165
<EPS-BASIC>                                       4.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.71


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 12
                      WILLIAMS COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                             --------------------------------
                                                               1999        1998        1997
                                                             ---------   ---------   --------
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
  Loss before income taxes.................................  $(367,472)  $(190,826)  $(28,005)
  Add:
     Interest expense -- net...............................     97,212       7,468        933
     Rental expense representative of interest factor......     96,786      44,590     28,120
     Minority interest income (loss) of consolidated
       subsidiaries........................................    (31,503)    (15,645)    13,506
     Equity losses.........................................     36,440       7,908      2,383
                                                             ---------   ---------   --------
          Total earnings (loss) as adjusted plus fixed
            charges........................................  $(168,537)  $(146,505)  $ 16,937
                                                             =========   =========   ========
Combined fixed charges:
  Interest expense -- net..................................  $  97,212   $   7,468   $    933
  Capitalized interest.....................................     39,518      11,182      7,781
  Rental expense representative of interest factor.........     96,786      44,590     28,120
                                                             ---------   ---------   --------
          Total fixed charges..............................  $ 233,516   $  63,240   $ 36,834
                                                             =========   =========   ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.........................         (a)         (a)        (a)
                                                             =========   =========   ========
</TABLE>

-------------------------

(a) Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $402,053,000,
    $209,745,000 and $19,897,000 for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
                   Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Western Wireless Corporation, a Washington corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,
      2005 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: May 6, 2005

                                                By: /s/ JOHN W. STANTON
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    John W. Stanton
                                                    Chairman of the Board and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

                                       44
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 162/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 162/2014 of 19 February 2014 approving non-minor amendments to the specification            for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Carota dell’Altopiano            del Fucino (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 162/2014                     

# of 19 February 2014

# approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin                        and protected geographical indications [Carota dell’Altopiano del Fucino (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Italy’s                              application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Carota dell’Altopiano                              del Fucino’ registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 148/2007(2).

(2)Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission                              published the amendment application in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.

(3)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments                              to the specification should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The amendments to the specification published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 February 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.6.****Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed**U.K.

#### ITALYU.K.

Carota dell’Altopiano del Fucino (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 46, 16.2.2007, p. 14.                           

3

OJ C 272, 20.9.2013, p. 11.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 169 (Thursday, September 1, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52016-52018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17378]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 265


Release of Information, Privacy of Information

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends the Postal Service\TM\ regulations on the 
release of information and privacy of information.

DATES: This rule is effective September 1, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Eyre at (202) 268-2608.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal Service is revising the format 
required for requests from process servers for change of address or 
boxholder information, and the format required for requests from 
government agencies for address information.

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 265

    Administrative practice and procedure, Courts, Freedom of 
information.

0
For the reasons set forth in this document, the Postal Service is 
amending 39 CFR part 265 as follows:

PART 265--RELEASE OF INFORMATION

0
1. The authority citation for part 265 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. App. 3; 39 U.S.C. 401, 403, 
410, 1001, 2601.


Sec.  265.6  [Amended]

0
2. In Sec.  265.6, following paragraph (g), the two figures are revised 
to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M

[[Page 52017]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01SE05.084


[[Page 52018]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR01SE05.085


Neva Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 05-17378 Filed 8-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-C
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-92,622-01

EX PARTE DONNIE RAY MEISMER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 59720-A IN THE 461 DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM BRAZORIA COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion joined by SLAUGHTER, J.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of online solicitation of a minor and sentenced to forty-two months’

imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the countyof conviction,

and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that the statute under which he was convicted was found to be

unconstitutional. In Ex parte Lo, this Court declared PenalCode Section 33.021(b) unconstitutional.

Ex parte Lo, 424 S.W.3d 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Applicant now contendsthat in light of Lo his

conviction is no longer valid. The State recommends that relief be granted in this cause. We agree.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Chance, 439 S.W.3d 918 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
2

The judgment in cause number 59720 in the 461 District Court of Brazoria County is set st 1

aside, and the cause is remanded so the trial court can dismiss the indictment.

Copies ofthis opinion shallbe sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: June 23, 2021

Do not publish

Applicant was charged and convicted in the 23 District Court in Brazoria County. The

1 rd

23 Judicial District now covers Matagorda and Wharton Counties, so this case has been rd

transferred to the 461 District Court in Brazoria County “for all purposes.” See Tex. Gov’t Code st

§§ 24.124, 24.6005.
# C_2023179EN.01007601.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/76

---

Action brought on 11 April 2023 — PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo and PT Nubika Jaya v Commission

(Case T-187/23)

(2023/C 179/105)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo (Medan, Indonesia), PT Nubika Jaya (Medan, Indonesia) (represented by: F. Graafsma and J. Cornelis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | Annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/111 of 18 January 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of fatty acid originating in Indonesia (1), and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/111 of 18 January 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of fatty acid originating in Indonesia (1), and

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the applicants’ costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the applicants’ costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (‘basic Regulation’) by rejecting the applicants’ request for individual dumping margin examination. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (‘basic Regulation’) by rejecting the applicants’ request for individual dumping margin examination.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a violation of Articles 3(2), 9(1), 9(2), 9(4) and 21(1) of basic Regulation, as well as Articles 5.7 and 5.8 of WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement by continuing the investigation and imposing duties despite the withdrawal of the complaint. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a violation of Articles 3(2), 9(1), 9(2), 9(4) and 21(1) of basic Regulation, as well as Articles 5.7 and 5.8 of WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement by continuing the investigation and imposing duties despite the withdrawal of the complaint.

---

(1)  JO 2023, L 18, p. 1.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 30, 2019

t0422 

# Order

Clerk April 30, 2019

157723

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157723

COA: 332742

Kent CC: 15

- 011596

- FC

JUAN ENRIQUE REYES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2 018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
FOOD LION, LLC v. FINAZZLE CORP. U.S.A.

No. COA07-1029.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Wake (05CVS13455).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We have issued our report dated March 24, 2000, (except for Note M, as
to which the date is December 15, 2000) accompanying the consolidated financial
statements included in the Annual Report of PopMail.com, inc. (formerly Cafe
Odyssey, Inc.) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended January 2, 2000. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of PopMail.com, inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-80241, File No.
333-85243, File No. 333-88199, File No. 333-93317, File No. 333-96109, File No.
333-32232, File No. 333-40694, File No.333-43774, and File No. 333-46468) and on
Forms S-8 (File No. 333-62729, File No. 333-62747, File No. 333-41966, and File
No. 333-47738).


                                                         /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 18, 2000
STATE v. Joseph Thomas OLDHAM.

No. 71P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of March 2008 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of April 2008."