alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OraLabs Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,
Gary H. Schlatter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 USC SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gary H. Schlatter
------------------------------------------
Gary H. Schlatter, Chief Executive Officer



Dated: April 29, 2005
STATE v. David Lamar APPLEWHITE.

No. 226P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 26, 2008.

LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of May 2008 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of August 2008."
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALAN B. GRIFFIN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4868

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 18, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011); State v. King, 

426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); Griffin v. State, 138 So. 3d 446 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (table 

decision); Griffin v. State, 104 So. 3d 1096 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (table decision); Griffin 

v. State, 53 So. 3d 1035 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision); Henry v. State, 933 So. 2d 

28 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Desmond v. State, 576 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); 

Edwards v. State, 128 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Golfe v. State, 125 So. 3d 876 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Wilson v. State, 109 So. 3d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Collins v. 
- 2 -

State, 97 So. 3d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Johnson v. Office of State Attorney, 987 So. 

2d 206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 99.3


                         RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
                                  EXHIBIT 99.3
              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1)       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the
                  quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                  and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:  December 16, 2002


                                    By /s/ Michael Maturo
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President,
                                       Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
In the Matter of the Application of Thomas COVINGTON, Jr. v. Sid HARKLEROAD Superintendent of Marion CI.

No. 455P01-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Thomas Covington, Pro Se.

Daniel O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 18th day of April 2008 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Columbus County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
ROSS v. ROSS.

No. COA07-981.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 7, 2008.

Certification Date October 27, 2008.

Appeal from Carteret (02CVD558).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; vacated and remanded in part.
WILKIE-FISHER v. P.H. GLATFELTER CO.

No. COA08-79.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 951842).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
CYPRUS GROUP, LLC v. TWISS.

No. COA07-1127.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (07CVS1420).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
|EXHIBIT 21                               
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|                                         
|PETER KIEWIT SONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|FEBRUARY 28, 2006                        
|                                         
|                                         
|Ben Holt Company                         
|Bibb and Associates, Inc.                
|Bighorn Walnut, LLC                      
|Buckskin Mining Company                  
|Construcciones Kiewit, S.A. de C.V.      
|Construction Kiewit Cie                  
|Constructora Kiewit, C.A.                
|Continental Alarm & Detection Company    
|Continental Fire Sprinkler Company       
|GBV-Texas, L.P.                          
|GIC Industrial, Inc.                     
|GMF 1 L.L.C.                             
|GSC Atlanta, Inc.                        
|GSC Contracting, Inc.                    
|General Construction Company             
|Gilbert Central Corp.                    
|Gilbert Frontier, Inc.                   
|Gilbert/Healy, L.P.                      
|Gilbert Industrial Corporation           
|Gilbert Industrial Texas, L.P.           
|Gilbert Marine L.L.C.                    
|Gilbert Network Services, L.P.           
|Gilbert Southern Corp.                   
|Gilbert Texas Corp.                      
|Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P.         
|Gilbert Western Corp.                    
|Global Surety & Insurance Co.            
|Guernsey Construction Company            
|KES Inc.                                 
|KT Developers, LLC                       
|KT Mining, LP                            
|KiEnergy, Inc.                           
|Kiewit Building Group Inc.               
|Kiewit Canada Group Inc.                 
|Kiewit Construction Company              
|Kiewit Constructors Inc.                 
|Kiewit Corporation                       
|Kiewit Development Company               
|Kiewit Energy Ltd.                       
|Kiewit Energy Canada Corp.               
|Kiewit Energy Company                    
|Kiewit Energy Constructors Corp.         
|Kiewit Energy Fabricators Corp.          
|                                         

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17886]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2005 / 
Notices

[[Page 53331]]



AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION MEETING


Board of Directors Meeting

    Time: Wednesday, September 14, 2005--9 a.m.-4 p.m.
    Place: The African Development Foundation, Conference Room, 1400 I 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
    Date: September 14, 2005.
    Status: Open Session.

Wednesday 14, 2005
    9 a.m. to 12 noon
    1 p.m. to 3 p.m.

    Closed Executive Session

Wednesday 14, 2005
    3 p.m. to 4 p.m.

Agenda

Wednesday, September 14, 2005
    9 a.m. Chairman's Report
    9:30 a.m. President's Report
    12 noon Break
    1 p.m. President's Report
    3 p.m. Executive's Session
    4 p.m. Adjournment for day

    If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to Doris 
Martin, General Counsel, who may be reached at (202) 673-3916.

Nathaniel Fields,
President.
[FR Doc. 05-17886 Filed 9-2-05; 4:59 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
# C_2023155EN.01006301.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/63

---

Action brought on 23 February 2023 — Stan v European Public Prosecutor’s Office

(Case T-103/23)

(2023/C 155/80)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Victor-Constantin Stan (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: A. Şandru, lawyer)

Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul the decision of the Permanent Chamber of 9 December 2022, in criminal case No 1.000026/2022 opened by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the decision of the Permanent Chamber’ or ‘the contested decision’) and subsequent acts, as unlawful and unfounded, by reason of the arguments put forward in the present action, and if necessary declare inapplicable the provisions of the internal rules of procedure of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office which conflict with Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant submits, in essence, that the decision of the Permanent Chamber No 4, being challenged, was issued in breach of Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’), which, as regards the composition of the Permanent Chamber, requires there to be two permanent Members in addition to the Chair. The contested decision was issued by a Permanent Chamber comprising only one permanent Member in addition to the Chair and to the supervising European Prosecutor who participated in the decision’s adoption.

---
# C_2023094EN.01005601.xml

| 13.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/56

---

Action brought on 19 January 2023 — Beauty Boutique v EUIPO — Lightningbolt Europe (Device of a lightning)

(Case T-12/23)

(2023/C 94/67)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Beauty Boutique sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Nowakowski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lightningbolt Europe SA (São Cosme Vale, Portugal)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark (device of a lightning) — Application for registration No 18 249 030

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2022 in Case R 668/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener (if applicable) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener (if applicable) to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                             227
<SECURITIES>                                         9
<RECEIVABLES>                                      454
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,073
<PP&E>                                             690
<DEPRECIATION>                                     482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              591
<BONDS>                                             13
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,377
<SALES>                                          3,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,403
<CGS>                                            3,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   141
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    131
<INCOME-TAX>                                        78
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                136
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.02
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. McSWEENEY.

No. COA07-1139.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (05CRS81028, 05CRS26421).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1064/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1064/2014 of 7 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for common sole in VIIf and            VIIg by vessels flying the flag of United Kingdom         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1064/2014                     

# of 7 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for common sole in VIIf and VIIg by vessels flying the flag of United Kingdom

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1169/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1169/2013 of 7 November 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela (PDO)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1169/2013                     

# of 7 November 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Maçã Riscadinha                        de Palmela (PDO)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Maçã Riscadinha                              de Palmela’ was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.6.****Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed**U.K.

#### PORTUGALU.K.

Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 85, 23.3.2013, p. 16.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3599 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3599

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to add crimes committed in 
   Indian country or exclusive Federal jurisdiction as racketeering 
                              predicates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 25 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

    Mr. Kyl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to add crimes committed in 
   Indian country or exclusive Federal jurisdiction as racketeering 
                              predicates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CRIMES COMMITTED IN INDIAN COUNTRY OR EXCLUSIVE FEDERAL 
              JURISDICTION AS RACKETEERING PREDICATES.

    Section 1961(1)(A) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, or would have been so chargeable if the act or threat 
(other than gambling conducted pursuant to Federal law) had not been 
committed in Indian country (as defined in section 1151) or in any 
other area of exclusive Federal jurisdiction,'' after ``chargeable 
under State law''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 32(a)


 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Jeffry N. Quinn, Chief Executive Officer of Solutia Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
                  fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.


Dated: March 14, 2006


                                          /s/ Jeffry N. Quinn
                                          -------------------
                                          Jeffry N. Quinn
                                          Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc.
and will be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. v. ATLANTIC FORKS, L.L.C.

No. COA07-1347.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (04CVS14813).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.