Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 2005 / Notices 52127 

(b) the quantity and value of your 

firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of 

Subject Merchandise and, if known, an 

estimate of the percentage of total 

exports to the United States of Subject 

Merchandise from each Subject Country 

accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. 

(10) Identify significant changes, if 

any, in the supply and demand 

conditions or business cycle for the 

Domestic Like Product that have 

occurred in the United States or in the 

market for the Subject Merchandise in 

each Subject Country after 1999, and 

significant changes, if any, that are 

likely to occur within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. Supply conditions to 

consider include technology; 

production methods; development 

efforts; ability to increase production 

(including the shift of production 

facilities used for other products and the 

use, cost, or availability of major inputs 

into production); and factors related to 

the ability to shift supply among 

different national markets (including 

barriers to importation in foreign 

markets or changes in market demand 

abroad). Demand conditions to consider 

include end uses and applications; the 

existence and availability of substitute 

products; and the level of competition 

among the Domestic Like Product 

produced in the United States, Subject 

Merchandise produced in each Subject 

Country, and such merchandise from 

other countries. 

(11) (OPTIONAL) A statement of 

whether you agree with the above 

definitions of the Domestic Like Product 

and Domestic Industry; if you disagree 

with either or both of these definitions, 

please explain why and provide 

alternative definitions. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.61 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 29, 2005. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–17440 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation and Liability Act 

(‘‘CERCLA’’) 

Pursuant to Section 122(d)(2) of 

CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(d)(2), notice is 

hereby given that on August 17, 2005, 

a proposed Consent Decree in United 

Stated v. Carrier Corporation, CV 05–

6022 ABC (RCx) (C.D. Cal.), was lodged 

with the United States District Court for 

the Central District of California. 

The Consent Decree resolves claims 

against Carrier Corporation (‘‘Carrier’’) 

brought by the United States on behalf 

of the Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’) under Sections 106 and 107 of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 

9607, and Section 7003 of the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act, as 

amended (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6973, for 

the performance of response actions and 

for the reimbursement of response costs 

incurred and to be incurred by EPA in 

connection with the release and 

threatened release of hazardous 

substances at the Puente Valley 

Operable Unit of the San Gabriel Valley 

Superfund Site, Area 4 (‘‘Site’’) in Los 

Angeles County, California. 

Under the proposed Consent Decree, 

Carrier and its parent corporation, 

United Technologies Corporation 

(together, ‘‘Settling Defendants’’), will 

perform a portion of the interim remedy 

for the Site. Specifically, Settling 

Defendants will construct a shallow 

groundwater zone remediation system 

and operate that system for eight years 

once the system is operational and 

functional. In addition, Settling 

Defendants will reimburse the United 

States a portion of past response costs 

and pay future oversight costs incurred 

by EPA related to the work. 

Additionally, the Consent Decree 

requires payment of a civil penalty for 

noncompliance with an EPA cleanup 

order issued to Carrier, performance of 

a supplemental environmental project 

in further mitigation of that penalty, and 

monitoring of upgradient contamination 

for a period of eight years. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, with a copy to Matthew A. 

Fogelson, Trial Attorney, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, 

Environmental Enforcement Section, 

301 Howard Street, Suite 1050, San 

Francisco, CA 94105, and should refer 

to United States v. Carrier Corporation, 

CV 05–6022 ABC (RCx), DOJ Ref. #90–

11–2–354/15. Commenters may request 

an opportunity for a public meeting in 

the affected area, in accordance with 

Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 

6973(d). 

The Consent Decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney, Civil Division, c/o AUSA 

Suzette Clover, 300 North Los Angeles 

Street, Room 7516, Los Angeles, 

California 90012. During the public 

comment period, the Consent Decree 

may be examined on the Department of 

Justice Web site at http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A copy 

of the Consent Decree also may be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy, please refer to United States v. 

Carrier Corporation, CV 05–6022 ABC 

(RCx), DOJ Ref. #90–11–2–354/15, and 

enclose a check in the amount of $77.50 

(25 cents per page reproduction cost) 

payable to the U.S. Treasury. To receive 

the Consent Decree without the 

Appendices, pay $19.75. 

Ellen Mahan, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment & Natural 

Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 05–17375 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Clean Air Act 

On August 25, 2005, Notice of 

Lodging of a Consent Decree was 

published in the Federal Register 

(Volume 70, Number 164, Page 49950–

49951). That Notice contains a 

typographical error; the inclusion of the 

word ‘‘million’’ after ‘‘$500,000.’’ The 

following is the corrected Notice. 

In accordance with Departmental 

Policy, 28 U.S.C. 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that on August 18, 2005, a 

proposed Consent Decree in United 

States v. Cosmed Group, Inc., Civil 

Action No. 05353ML, was lodged with 

the United States District Court for the 

District of Rhode Island. 

In this action the United States, on 

behalf of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’), filed a complaint against 

Cosmed Group, Inc. (‘‘Cosmed’’) 

alleging various violations of the Clean 

Air Act and the Illinois State 

Implementation Plan, concerning 

Cosmed’s current or former facilities in 

Coventry, RI, South Plainfield, NJ, 

Baltimore, MD, Waukegan, IL, Grand