alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1087/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1087/2014 of 14 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in Union            waters of IIa and IV by vessels flying the flag of Denmark         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1087/2014                     

# of 14 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in Union waters of IIa and IV by vessels flying the flag of Denmark

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
IN RE C.J.H.

No. COA06-1714.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Davidson (05J184, 05J185, 05J186, 05J187).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
cgld_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
 
 
 
 
	 
	1


	

	 


 
 
	 
	2


	

	 


 
 
	 
	3


	

	 


 
 
	 
	4


	

	 


 
 
 
	5
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.2.23

            SCHEDULE OF MATERIAL DIFFERENCES AMONG PERCENTAGE LEASES

                  The following lists of material differences between the
Percentage Lease filed as Exhibit 10.2 and the Percentage Lease identified by
the Exhibit number below and is being filed pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item
601 of Regulation S-K.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit                                                             Annual Base              Percentage Rent
Number            Percentage Lease Description                         Rent                     Formula
------            ----------------------------                      -----------          ---------------------
<S>               <C>                                                <C>                 <C>    
10.2.23           Lease Agreement dated as of October 29,            $300,000            30.0% of room revenue
                  1997 by and between Sunstone Hotel Investors,                          up to $83,333, plus
                  L.P. as lessor and Sunstone Hotel Properties,                          61.5% of room revenue
                  Inc., as lessee, for the Holiday Inn                                   in excess of $83,333
                  located in Flagstaff, Arizona                                          plus 5% of food and
                                                                                         beverage revenue, plus
                                                                                         100% of sublease and
                                                                                         concession revenue and
                                                                                         other net revenues.
</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1132/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1132/2014 of 24 October 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1132/2014                     

# of 24 October 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Exhibit 32 

Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of NovaDel Pharma Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Gary A. Shangold, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael E. Spicer, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| Date:        October 27, 2005 |   | By:                                          | /s/        Gary A. Shangold                    |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Gary        A. Shangold, M.D.                |
|                          |   | President        and Chief Executive Officer |
|                          |   |                                         |
| Date:        October 27, 2005 |   | By:                                          | /s/        Michael E. Spicer                   |
|                          |   | Michael        E. Spicer                     |
|                          |   | Chief        Financial Officer               |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act. 

 

 

----
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 558/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 558/2013 of 17 June 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 558/2013                     

# of 17 June 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# Commission Directive 2014/93/EU (repealed)Show full title

Commission Directive 2014/93/EU of 18 July 2014 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (Text with EEA relevance)            (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Directive 2014/93/EU                     

# of 18 July 2014

# amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on marine equipment and repealing Council                                 Directive 96/98/EC (Text with EEA relevance).
STATE v. Alfred William RILEY, Jr.

No. 618P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day, of December 2007 by Defendant for Notice of Appeal (Constitutional Question):

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of January 2008."
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

AWARD AGREEMENT 
 GRANT
OF PHANTOM UNITS 
 ITT Educational Services, Inc. Non-Employee Directors 2016 Phantom Units Plan 

Name of Participant:
                                         
            
 Date of Grant: May 2, 2016
                                 

Number of Phantom Units Granted: [Calculate and insert number of Phantom Units being granted, which will be calculated by dividing $100,000 by the closing
price on May 2, 2016.] 
 This Award Agreement (this “Agreement”) between ITT Educational Services, Inc. (the
“Company”), and the Participant named above (the “Participant”) evidences the grant to the Participant of Phantom Units under the ITT Educational Services, Inc. Non-Employee Directors 2016 Phantom Units Plan (the
“Plan”). Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings given to those terms in the Plan. 
 The
Company and the Participant agree as follows: 
 1. Grant of Phantom Units. The Company hereby grants to the Participant, as of the
date stated above (the “Date of Grant”), that number of Phantom Units stated above (the “Phantom Units”), subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Plan. 

2. Vesting. The Phantom Units granted pursuant to this Agreement shall vest on May 2, 2017, or, if sooner, upon the earlier to
occur of the following: (1) a Change in Control; or (2) the Participant’s Separation From Service by reason of the Participant’s death or Disability. 

3. Payment to Participant. The Company shall make payment to the Participant with respect to his or her Phantom Units in accordance
with, and subject to, the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan. 
 4. Plan Controlling. This Agreement is subject in all
respects to the terms and conditions of the Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference. All determinations and interpretations of the Plan and this Agreement by the Board shall be binding and conclusive upon the Participant and his or her legal
representatives. A copy of the Plan has been delivered to the Participant, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the Plan and the provisions of this Agreement, the terms, conditions and
provisions of the Plan shall control, and this Agreement shall be deemed to be modified accordingly. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Participant have executed this Agreement as of the
     day of May, 2016. 
  

			
	ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

	Printed:	 	  

	Title:	 	  

	
	  

	Participant



  
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,131
<INVENTORY>                                        405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,165
<PP&E>                                           9,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,836
<BONDS>                                          1,942
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            30
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,746
<SALES>                                          4,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,944
<CGS>                                            1,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    16
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,365)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheets and unaudited condensed statements of
income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to
date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       8,062,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,138,000
<PP&E>                                       3,338,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,561,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,949,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,740,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,869,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,561,000 
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,000
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               200,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,377,000 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   450,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,886,000     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63 

</TABLE>
STATE v. Jeffrey Noah FRAZIER.

No. 146P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of March 2007 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."