alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In re Michael H. MARTIN v. Lawrence E. SOLOMON, Superintendent. Caledonia Correctional Institution of the North Carolina Department of Corrections.

No. 283P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Michael H. Martin, pro se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Solomon, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 15th day of June 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 17th day of August 2007 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Forsyth County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 11th day of October 2007."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: HENRY A. AHNERT, III,

IRREVOCABLE LIFE INSURANCE

TRUST, DATED 12/31/1995

PETITION OF: RHETA A. KILLIAN

(CONNOR AHNERT)

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 209 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Larry Roger AYSCUE, Jr.

No. 6P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Anne Bleyman, for Larry Roger Ayscue, Jr.

Chris Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of January 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 7th day of January 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is *52"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
unaudited
condensed balance sheets and unaudited condensed statements of income found on
pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is 
qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,423,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,000      
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,870,000         
<PP&E>                                         144,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,671,000           
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,441,000         
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         3,000     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,740,000         
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,656,000         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,671,000           
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,000       
<CGS>                                                0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               679,000       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (448,000)         
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                               2,121,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,673,000     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55 

</TABLE>
# Council Decision of 29 September 2014 appointing three French members and two French alternate members of the Committee of            the Regions (2014/694/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 29 September 2014

# appointing three French members and two French alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/694/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the French Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)Three members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Bruno                              BOURG-BROC, Mr Michel DELEBARRE and Mr Jean-Louis JOSEPH.

(3)Two alternate members' seats have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Jean-Michel DACLIN and Ms Claudine                              LEDOUX,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which                     runs until 25 January 2015:                  

as members:
                -  Mr Bruno BOURG-BROC, *Conseiller municipal de Châlons-en-Champagne* (change of mandate)                                  
                -  Mr Michel DELEBARRE, *Conseiller municipal de Dunkerque* (change of mandate)                                  
                -  Ms Françoise MESNARD, *Maire de Saint-Jean d'Angély*                                   

and

as alternate members:
                -  Ms Karine DOGNIN-SAUZE, *Adjointe au Maire de Lyon*                                   
                -  Mr Dominique LEVEQUE, *Maire d'Aÿ*.                                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 29 September 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
WARD v. JETT PROPERTIES, LLC.

No. COA07-1448.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (07CVD4315).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE ESTATE OF VAN LINDLEY.

No. COA06-1281.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (90E1895).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; remanded in part.
POTCHAK v. TATUM.

No. COA07-1303.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Durham (06CVS6512).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

ERNEST L. DIXON, : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 10-1499 (RMU 

 : 

 : Re Document No. : 3 

 : 

SOCIAL SECURITY : 

ADMINISTRATION, : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRANTING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS CONCEDED

 This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. On September 3, 

2010, the pro se plaintiff filed a handwritten one-page complaint stating that he 

is suing the Social Security Administration Office on M-Street NW in 

Washington D.C. for the amount of $999,000,000,000,000,000.00 for not 

retroacting [sic] my social security check as instructed[.] Also I am suing the said 

for $999,000,000,000,000,000.00 for punitive damages. 

Compl. at 1. 

 On November 2, 2010, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint. 

See generally Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss. The same day, the court issued a Fox-Neal order directing 

the plaintiff to respond to the pending motion to dismiss by November 22, 2010 and advising the 

plaintiff that his failure to respond to the motion could result in the court deeming the matter 

conceded. Order (Nov. 1, 2010). 

To date, the plaintiff has not responded to the motion to dismiss. His failure to do so 

permits the court to treat the motion as conceded. Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 

1294-95 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Accordingly, the court grants the defendant’s motion to dismiss. An 
Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is separately and contemporaneously issued 

this 30th day of November, 2010. 

 RICARDO M. URBINA 

 United States District Judge
AUSTIN HATCHER REALTY, INC. v. ARNOLD.

No. COA07-1377.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 3, 2008.

Certification Date June 23, 2008.

Appeal from Brunswick (07CVS255).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ERNEST L. DIXON, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 10-1499 (RMU : : Re Document No. : 3 : SOCIAL SECURITY : ADMINISTRATION, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION G RANTING THE D EFENDANT ’ S M OTION TO D ISMISS AS C ONCEDED This matter is before the court on the defe ndant’s motion to dismiss. On September 3, 2010, the pro se plaintiff filed a handwritten one-p age complaint stating that he is suing the Social Security Administration Office on M-Street NW in Washington D.C. for the amount of $999,000,000,000,000,000.00 for not retroacting [sic] my social security check as instructed[.] Also I am suing the said for $999,000,000,000,000,000.00 for punitive damages. Compl. at 1. On November 2, 2010, the defendant filed a moti on to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint. See generally Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss. The same day, the court issued a Fox-Neal order directing the plaintiff to respond to th e pending motion to dismiss by November 22, 2010 and advising the plaintiff that his failure to respond to the mo tion could result in the court deeming the matter conceded. Order (Nov. 1, 2010). To date, the plaintiff has not responded to th e motion to dismiss. His failure to do so permits the court to treat the motion as conceded. Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc. , 389 F.3d 1291, 1294-95 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Accordingly, the court gr ants the defendant’s motion to dismiss. AnOrder consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is separately and contemporaneously issued this 30th day of November, 2010.

RICARDO M. URBINA United States District Judge
STATE v. ARROYO.

No. COA07-1474.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (05CRS21710).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                       InKine Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of InKine Pharmaceutical
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Leonard S. Jacob, M.D., Ph.D., Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Date: November 14, 2002                     /s/ Leonard S. Jacob, M.D., Ph.D.
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Leonard S. Jacob, M.D., Ph.D.
                                            Chairman of the Board and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. VISINGARD.

No. COA07-259.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 20, 2008.

Certification Date June 9, 2008.

Appeal from Gaston (05CRS18412, 05CRS50251, 05CRS50253, 05CRS50254).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 797/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 797/2014 of 23 July 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 797/2014                     

# of 23 July 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 July 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# **Exhibit 32.1**

#  

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

#  

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the Chief Executive Officer of Western SizzlinCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2008 and the financial statements contained therein,fully comply with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Qand the financial statements thereto fairly present, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of June 30,2008, and the period then ended.

 
| /s/  Sardar Biglari |   | Date:  August 14, 2008 |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------|

 

----
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1039/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1039/2014 of 30 September 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1039/2014                     

# of 30 September 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                              OMEGA CABINETS, LTD.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   Year ended
                                                   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     December 28,  December 27,  January 2,   January 1,     December 30,
                                                         1996          1997         1999         2000           2000
                                                   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
Income before income taxes and
 extraordinary item                                  $11,856,024    $ 3,460,653   $10,838,026  $26,620,101  $27,625,206

Fixed charges:

  Interest expense                                    10,441,182     16,311,997    15,074,327   17,445,914   17,342,449

  Estimated portion of rental expense
   attributable to interest costs (25%)                  421,500        402,750       384,750      594,250      636,500
                                                   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges                                   10,862,682     16,714,747    15,459,077   18,040,164   17,978,949
                                                   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges       $22,718,706    $20,175,400   $26,297,103  $44,660,265  $45,604,155
                                                   ========================================================================
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           2.1            1.2           1.7          2.5          2.5
</TABLE>