alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-58,749-03

IN RE DARBY NA THANIEL DANIEL S, Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 728606-B IN THE 185T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 185th District Court of Har ri s C o u n t y , t h at more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. On May 14, 2014, we held this application in abey ance and order ed Respondent, the District Clerk of Har

ris County , to f

ile a response . Acc ording to the response , the State rec eived Relator’s habea s application on Dec ember 3, 2013, and the trial court enter ed an order desig nating issues on J anuar y 30, 2014. This order was untimely

. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(b)( c); Martin2

v. Hamlin , 25 S.W .3d 718 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). We cond i t i o nally g rant mandamus relief and direc t Respondent to immediately forwa rd Relator’s habea s application to this Court. The writ of mandamus will issue only if Respondent fails to comply with this opi nion. Deliver ed: J uly

23, 2014 Do not publish
STATE of North Carolina v. Eugene Tyrone DeCASTRO.

No. 221A93-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Paul Green, Paul Gomez, for DeCastro.

Barry McNeill, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 16th day of October 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Johnston County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3566 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3566

  To prohibit the Secretary of Labor from issuing, administering, or 
    enforcing any rule, regulation, or requirement derived from the 
  proposal submitted to the Office of Management and Budget entitled 
  ``Requirements for DOL Agencies' Assessment of Occupational Health 
                       Risks'' (RIN: 1290-AA23).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 24 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

 Mrs. Murray (for herself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Obama, Mr. Brown, and Mr. 
   Menendez) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Secretary of Labor from issuing, administering, or 
    enforcing any rule, regulation, or requirement derived from the 
  proposal submitted to the Office of Management and Budget entitled 
  ``Requirements for DOL Agencies' Assessment of Occupational Health 
                       Risks'' (RIN: 1290-AA23).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST CERTAIN RULES.

    The Secretary of Labor shall not issue, administer, or enforce any 
rule, regulation, or requirement derived from the proposal submitted to 
the Office of Management and Budget entitled ``Requirements for DOL 
Agencies' Assessment of Occupational Health Risks'' (RIN: 1290-AA23).
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. John Michael REBER.

No. 196P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Anne Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Reber.

Laura Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 641 S.E.2d 742.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
# Council Regulation (EU) No 748/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Council Regulation (EU) No 748/2014 of 10 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan            (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Regulation (EU) No 748/2014                     

# of 10 July 2014

# concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 of 7 May 2015 concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan,                                 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 748/2014.
STATE v. DAVIS.

No. COA07-1329.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Henderson (05CRS2258).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Political and Security Committee Decision EUBAM Libya/2/2014Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision EUBAM Libya/2/2014 of 14 January 2014 on the acceptance of third States' contributions            to the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya) (2014/17/CFSP)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision EUBAM Libya/2/2014                     

# of 14 January 2014

# on the acceptance of third States' contributions to the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in                        Libya (EUBAM Libya)                     

# (2014/17/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/233/CFSP of 22 May 2013 on the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance                           Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya)(1), and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Decision 2013/233/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to                              take relevant decisions on the acceptance of contributions to EUBAM Libya by third States.

(2)The Civilian Operations Commander recommended that the PSC accept the proposed contribution from the Swiss Confederation to                              EUBAM Libya and to consider it as significant.

(3)The Swiss Confederation should be exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUBAM Libya,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

## Article 1U.K.Third States' contributions

1.The contribution from the Swiss Confederation to the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya                        (EUBAM Libya) is accepted and shall be considered to be significant.                  

2.The Swiss Confederation shall be exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUBAM Libya.                  

## Article 2U.K.Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 14 January 2014.

*For the Political and Security Committee*                            

*The Chairperson*                            

W. Stevens                            

1

OJ L 138, 24.5.2013, p. 15.
SEAGLE v. HERRING.

No. COA07-655.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Rowan (05CVS3289).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
#### Jane Doe, Respondent, v Madison Medical-The Private Practice Group of New York, L.L.P., et al., Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. American Building Maintenance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 844]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered October 6, 2004, dismissing the third-party complaint pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered July 14, 2004, which, inter alia, granted third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered July 14, 2004, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs submissions presented a material issue of fact sufficient to defeat summary judgment dismissal at least with respect to the February 1, 1999 incident. Third-party defendant’s motion was properly granted upon a sufficient showing, through the affidavit of its district manager, that the contract between the parties did not contain an indemnification clause. Concur— Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

**CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Rhett R.Atkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of  Eden Bioscience Corporation, certifythat:

1.  I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of  Eden Bioscience Corporation;

2.  Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not  contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to  state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,  in lightof the circumstances under which such statements  were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered  by this quarterly report;

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and  other financial information included in thisquarterly  report, fairly present in all material respects the  financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of  the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this  quarterly report;

4.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are  responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or  caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be  designed under our supervision, to ensure that material  informationrelating to the registrant, including its  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others  within those entities, particularly during the period in  which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;

b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s  disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this  report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the  disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the  period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

c)  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's  internal control over financial reportingthat occurred  during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has  materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the registrant's internalcontrol over financial  reporting; and

5.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have  disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal  control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board  of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)  allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in  the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial  reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect  theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and  report financialinformation; and

b)  any fraud,whether or not material, that involves  management or other employees who have asignificant role in  the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  October28, 2005

|   |   |   | /s/      Rhett R. Atkins              |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                       |
|   |   |   | Rhett R. Atkins                       |
|   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3741 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3741

To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit regulation of certain emissions 
                     from agricultural production.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 11 (legislative day, December 10), 2008

   Mr. Thune introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit regulation of certain emissions 
                     from agricultural production.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REGULATION OF CERTAIN EMISSIONS FROM 
              AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Title III of the Clean Air Act is amended--
            (1) by inserting after section 312 (42 U.S.C. 7612) the 
        following:

``SEC. 313. PROHIBITION ON REGULATION OF CERTAIN EMISSIONS FROM 
              AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator 
shall not regulate under this Act any emission of carbon dioxide, 
nitrogen oxide, or methane resulting from agricultural production.''; 
and
            (2) by redesignating the second section 317 (42 U.S.C. 
        7617) (relating to economic impact assessment) as section 318.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 302(g) of the Clean Air Act (42 
U.S.C. 7602(g)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(g) The term'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(g) Air Pollutant.--
            ``(1) In general.--The term'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Such term'' and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(2) Inclusion.--The term `air pollutant'''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Exclusion.--The term `air pollutant' does not include 
        carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide, or methane resulting from 
        agricultural production.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this periodic
report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and that information  contained in
this periodic report fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust IV.

Date:  December 10, 2004       /s/ Robert E. Swanson
                             --------------------------------
                             Robert E. Swanson
                             Chief Executive Officer

Date:  December 10, 2004       /s/ Christopher I. Naunton
                             --------------------------------
                             Christopher I. Naunton
                             Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. VICK.

No. COA07-1163.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Edgecombe (06CRS51346).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-30-1996
<CASH>                                          280,529
<SECURITIES>                                  2,417,415
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,726,631
<PP&E>                                          125,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                   76,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,813,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            57,953
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            331
<OTHER-SE>                                    2,615,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,813,880
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (392,336)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (392,336)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (392,336)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (392,336)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. GILBERT.

No. COA07-1533.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Cabarrus (06CRS53583, 06CRS15211, 06CRS53581).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 300/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 300/2014 of 24 March 2014 withdrawing the suspension of submission of applications            for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 300/2014                     

# of 24 March 2014

# withdrawing the suspension of submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No                           234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009 opening and providing for the administration                           of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector(2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)The submission of applications for import licences concerning order number 09.4321 was suspended as from 27 September 2013                              by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 931/2013 of 26 September 2013 fixing the allocation coefficient for the issuing                              of import licences applied for from 8 to 14 September 2013 for sugar products under certain tariff quotas and suspending submission                              of applications for such licences(3), in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 891/2009.

(2)Following notifications on unused and/or partly used licences, quantities became available again for this order number. The                              suspension of applications should therefore be withdrawn,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The suspension of submission of applications for import licences for order number 09.4321 as from 27 September 2013 laid down                     by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 931/2013 is withdrawn.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 March 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 254, 26.9.2009, p. 82.                           

3

OJ L 255, 27.9.2013, p. 11.
II 

Calendar No. 271 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 392 

[Report No. 110–130] 

To ensure payment of United States assessments for United Nations 

peacekeeping operations for the 2005 through 2008 time period. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2007 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. VOINOVICH, and Mr. 

HAGEL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

JULY 16, 2007 

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To ensure payment of United States assessments for United 

Nations peacekeeping operations for the 2005 through 

2008 time period. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 392 RS

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON THE UNITED STATES SHARE OF 

2 ASSESSMENTS FOR UNITED NATIONS PEACE3 KEEPING OPERATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 404(b)(2)(B) of the For5 eign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 

6 1995 (Public Law 103–236; 22 U.S.C. 287e note) is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(v) For assessments made during 

9 calendar years 2005, 2006, 2007, and 

10 2008, 27.1 percent.’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 411 of the 

12 Department of State and Related Agency Appropriations 

13 Act, 2005 (title IV of division B of Public Law 108–447; 

14 22 U.S.C. 287e note) is repealed. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 271 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 392 

[Report No. 110

–130] 

A BILL 

To ensure payment of United States assessments 

the 2005 through 2008 time period. for United Nations peacekeeping operations for 

JULY 16, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
STATE v. PORTER.

No. COA07-412.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Cleveland (05CRS7035, 05CRS7036, 05CRS7037, 05CRS7038).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed and remanded.