alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3681 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ‘‘Joseph A. 

Ryan Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ‘‘Joseph A. Ryan Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOSEPH A. RYAN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 5070 Vegas Valley Drive in Las 

6 Vegas, Nevada, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jo7 seph A. Ryan Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3681 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Joseph A. Ryan Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE 
ETSY, INC. 
MANAGEMENT CASH INCENTIVE PLAN
Effective April 4, 2016


The Board of Directors of Etsy, Inc. adopted the Etsy, Inc. Management Cash Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) on March 4, 2015.  


Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.2 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors hereby approves the following amendments to the Plan, effective April 4, 2016. 


The Plan is amended as follows: 

		
	1)
	Section 3.7 is amended by adding the language shown in italics below:




3.7 Leaves of Absence. Except as otherwise provided in a participation notice, if a Participant is on a leave of absence for a portion of a Performance Period, to the extent permissible by applicable law, the Participant will be eligible to receive only a pro-rated Award reflecting participation for the period during which he or she was actively employed and not any period when the Participant was on leave.


		
	2)
	Section 4.2 is amended by adding the language shown in italics below:




4.2 Timing of Payment.  Subject to Section 3.5, payment of each Actual Award shall be made as soon as administratively practicable, but in the United States, in no event later than two and one-half months after the end of the later of the calendar or Company fiscal year (as applicable) in which the Participant becomes vested in such payment.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Man Keung Alan Wai, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



|/s/ Man Keung Alan Wai  | 
|----------------------- | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|March 29, 2018          | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and
will be retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN RE J.C.

No. COA07-744.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 18, 2007.

Certification Date January 7, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (05JT555).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                              EXHIBIT 21

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

    The following is a list of Solutia's subsidiaries as of December 31,
2002, except for unnamed subsidiaries that, considered in the aggregate
as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

                                                              Percentage of
                                                              Voting Power
                                                                Owned by
                                                                 Solutia
                                                              -------------

CarboGen Laboratories (Aarau) AG............................       100%

CPFilms Inc. ...............................................       100%

Erste Viking Resins Germany 1 GmbH..........................       100%

Monchem, Inc. ..............................................       100%

Monchem International, Inc. ................................       100%

Solutia Austria GmbH........................................       100%

Solutia Deutschland Holding GmbH............................       100%

Solutia Europe S.A./N.V. ...................................       100%

Solutia Germany GmbH & Co. KG...............................       100%

Solutia Investments, LLC....................................       100%

Solutia Italy S.R.L. .......................................       100%

Solutia Netherlands Holdings B.V. ..........................       100%

Solutia Services International SCA/Comm, VA.................       100%

Solutia Systems, Inc. ......................................       100%

Solutia U.K. Holdings Limited...............................       100%

Solutia U.K. Investments Limited............................       100%

Solutia U.K. Limited........................................       100%

Viking Resins Germany Holding GmbH & Co. KG.................       100%

    Erste Viking Resins Germany 1 GmbH, Solutia Austria GmbH, Solutia
Germany GmbH & Co. KG, Viking Resins Germany Holding GmbH & Co. KG, and
Solutia Italy S.R.L. were included in the sale of Solutia's resins,
additives and adhesives businesses to UCB S.A. on January 31, 2003.

                                   85
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

RE: Docket Number 2023 - CA - 0052 Louisiana Health Service & 

### Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Louisiana Versus - - 

### Kimberly L. Robinson, in hercapacity as Secretary ofthe Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana 

### Consolidated with the following: Louisiana Board ofTax Appeals Case #: 9927 East Baton Rouge Parish

2023 - CA - 0053 Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Louisiana versus 

### Kimberly L. Robinson, in her capacity as Secretary ofthe Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana 

### On Application for Rehearing filed on 06/ 19/2023 by Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company, et al Rehearing 

### DiN1ED

Jewel E. " Duke" Welch Jr. 

# a g 0 46 Allison H. Penzato 

# 6, 74 7 Walter I. Lanier II

Date z 

## uL 0 6 2023

Rodd Naqu
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Albert Rodriguez, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 4]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward M. Davidowitz, J., on motion to dismiss; John A. Barone, J., at hearing, jury trial and sentence), rendered October 9, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in entertaining the People’s technically untimely motion to reargue the dismissal of the count of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (see CPLR 2221 [d]; *Garcia v The Jesuits of Fordham,*6 AD3d 163, 165 [2004]), especially as the People’s delay was caused by ongoing plea negotiations with defendant. The sufficiency of the grand jury evidence is not reviewable on appeal since the ensuing judgment was based on legally sufficient trial evidence (CPL 210.30 [6]).

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress a gun. An identified citizen-informant told the police that a man had threatened to kill him. While canvassing the area with the informant, the officer heard what he believed to be a gunshot, and observed a large crowd of people running in the opposite direction from which defendant alone was walking, whereupon the informant identified defendant as the man who had threatened to kill him. Under the totality of these circumstances, the officer had, at least, reasonable suspicion that defendant might be armed, thereby justifying a stop and frisk *(see e.g. People v Brown,*288 AD2d 152 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 727 [2002]).

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Saxe and Williams, JJ.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jerome Andrew DICKERSON.

No. 72P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Marilyn Ozer, Chapel Hill, for Dickerson.

Jill Cheek, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 19th day of February 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the *429appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of February 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
### Exhibit 32.1

VERTICALNET, INC.CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERRELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Nathanael V. Lentz, President and Chief Executive Officer of Verticalnet, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

|       | (1)                   | The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Form 10-K/A”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                           | (2)    | The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                       |

|   |        | **/s/   NATHANAEL V. LENTZ          ** |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                    |
|   |   | Nathanael V. Lentz                                                                                 |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                                                              |
|   |   | Date:  November 25, 2003                                                                      |

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Verticalnet, Inc. and will be retained by Verticalnet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2015 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d
S t a t e s C our t of A

ppe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

8-4-2015 

# S t eve n S imr in g v

. Rut ge rs U ni

ve rsit y

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2015

Thi s Au g us t i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of A

ppe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a
U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2015 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a
U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" S t e v e n S imr in g v

. R ut g e r s U niv e r sit y " (2015). 2015 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 827. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2015/827

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

No. 14

- 1126

________________

M.D. STEVEN S. SIMRING, United States of America, ex rel.

v.

RUTGERS, The State University of New Jersey; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; NEW JERSEY MEDI CAL SCHOOL; JAMES LAWLER; JOHN DOES 1

- 25, (Employees of University of Medicine and Dentistry), UMDNJ

- University Hospital and/or New Jersey Medical School; CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES; MICHAEL SAULICH; CATHERINE GIBBONS; UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN

ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY INC.

M.D. Steven S. Simring,

Appellant

________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil Action No. 3

- 04

- cv

- 03530) District Judge: Honorable Peter G. Sheridan

________________

Before: AMBRO, SCIRICA, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

__________________________________ The petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellant, Steven Simring, M.D. in th e

above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision

### of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is

granted. The opinion and judgment entered July 7, 2015 are hereby VACATED. 1 

### A

s ubsequent opinion and judgment will be issued.

By the Court,

s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: August 4, 2015

1 

### As the merits panel has vacated the prior opinion and judgment, action is not required by the en banc court.
STATE v. McCALL.

No. COA07-1252.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Columbus (05CRS463, 05CRS1013, 05CRS1014).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Amendment No. 1 to 1999 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.35 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. 
 1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 This Amendment No. 1 to the Huttig Building Products, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors on April 28, 2003. 
  
 The Plan is amended as follows: 
  
 1. Clause (c) of Section 7 of the Plan is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “(c) Except as otherwise permitted by the Committee or as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, if a Participant’s
employment is terminated for any reason other than death, disability or retirement or after a Change in Control, such Participant may exercise any Option in whole or in part, at any time within 90 days after such termination of employment, but only
to the extent such Option is exercisable at the date of termination in accordance with Section 6(b). In no event may any Option be exercised after the expiration of the term of the Option.” 
  
 2. Effective Date: This amendment shall be effective as of March 5, 2003.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kaher Maruf MUHAMMAD.

No. 547A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Daniel R. Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Muhammad.

Diane A. Reeves, Special Deputy Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 651 S.E.2d 569.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 14th day of November 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10360

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PHILLIP SEAN ANTHONY, also known as Michael Hale, also known as 

Carlton Field,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:11-CR-74-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Phillip Sean 

Anthony has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Anthony has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10360 Document: 00513804333 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-10360

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-10360 Document: 00513804333 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
STATE v. DIEZ.

No. COA06-1516.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Durham (05CRS50179, 05CRS50180).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000930114
<NAME>                        GAYLORD COMPANIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         48,572
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,041,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,004,740
<PP&E>                                         582,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,331,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,011,615
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    300,000
<COMMON>                                       31,164
<OTHER-SE>                                     988,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,331,770
<SALES>                                        2,711,327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,711,327
<CGS>                                          2,083,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,060,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               80,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             79,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (512,745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (512,745)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power
      Trust IV (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.








/s/
      Randall D. Holmes


Name:
            Randall
                D. HolmesTitle:
            Chief
                Executive OfficerDate:
            November
                27, 2007











/s/
      Jeffrey H. Strasberg


Name:
            Jeffrey
                H. StrasbergTitle:
            Executive
                Vice President andChief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            November
                27, 2007
SIMMONS-BLOUNT v. GUILFORD COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.

No. COA07-377.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (06CVS7773).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Vacated and Remanded with Instructions.