alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of UST Private Equity Investors Fund, Inc. (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2003 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 17, 2003                       /s/ David I. Fann
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Name:  David I. Fann
                                            Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 17, 2003                       /s/ Douglas A. Lindgren
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Name:  Douglas A. Lindgren
                                            Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 17, 2003                       /s/ Brian F. Schmidt
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Name:  Brian F. Schmidt
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
STATE v. Dane LOCKLEAR, Jr.

No. 578A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2007.

William P. Hart, Jr., Valerie Spalding, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of November 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Dane Locklear, Jr.) shall have up to and including the 16th day of January 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of November 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-27-1999             MAR-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999             MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                           1,994                   1,994
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,780                  43,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,346                   1,346
<INVENTORY>                                     48,940                  48,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,121                  97,121
<PP&E>                                          30,382                  30,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,505                  11,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,192                 173,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,152                  39,152
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          6                       6
<COMMON>                                           104                     104
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,192                 173,192
<SALES>                                        292,313                  70,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               292,313                  70,462
<CGS>                                          196,411                  47,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,270                  19,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,835                   1,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,797                   2,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,644                   1,061
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,153                   1,638
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,153                   1,638
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.95                    0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91                    0.15


</TABLE>
# Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1026/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1026/2014 of 25 July 2014 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007            applying the arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific            (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, Economic Partnership Agreements,            as amended by Regulation (EU) No 527/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the exclusion of a number            of countries from the list of regions or states which have concluded negotiations (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1026/2014                     

# of 25 July 2014

# amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 applying the arrangements for products originating in certain states                        which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading                        to the establishment of, Economic Partnership Agreements, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 527/2013 of the European Parliament                        and of the Council as regards the exclusion of a number of countries from the list of regions or states which have concluded                        negotiations (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Regulation (EU) 2016/1076 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 applying the arrangements for products                                 originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements                                 establishing, or leading to the establishment of, economic partnership agreements.
STATE of North Carolina v. Erick DANIELS.

No. 74P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Carlos E. Mahoney, Durham, for Erick Daniels.

Jason Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of February 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."

HUDSON, J., recused.
STATE v. MINTZ.

No. COA07-167.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from New Hanover (05CRS51687).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. William COOPER, Jr.

No. 371P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of August 2007 by Defendant to Deny State's Motion to Deem Timely Filed It's Response to Defendant's Petition for Discretionary:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of August 2007."
# C_2023054EN.01001902.xml

| 13.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 54/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 54/19

---

Action brought on 12 December 2022 — TJ and Others v Council

(Case T-775/22)

(2023/C 54/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: TJ and the 7 other applicants (represented by: J. Janssen, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | admit and uphold the pleas for annulment raised in the present application; |
| --- | --- |

—

admit and uphold the pleas for annulment raised in the present application;

| — | annul Chapter III of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 of 6 October 2022 on an emergency intervention to address high energy prices (1) (‘contested Regulation’); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Chapter III of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 of 6 October 2022 on an emergency intervention to address high energy prices (1) (‘contested Regulation’);

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 15 of the contested Regulation insofar as it allows the retroactive levy of a solidarity contribution over the year 2022; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 15 of the contested Regulation insofar as it allows the retroactive levy of a solidarity contribution over the year 2022; and

| — | order the Council to pay the costs of this procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs of this procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was incorrectly adopted on the basis of article 122(1) TFEU and should have been adopted by the Council, acting unanimously after consulting the European Parliament and in accordance with a special legislative procedure, as the contested Regulation contains fiscal measures. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was incorrectly adopted on the basis of article 122(1) TFEU and should have been adopted by the Council, acting unanimously after consulting the European Parliament and in accordance with a special legislative procedure, as the contested Regulation contains fiscal measures.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation constitutes a violation of the right to property as enshrined in Article 1 First Protocol to the ECHR and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, as well as the EU principles of legality and legal certainty, insofar the contested Regulation allows for retroactive application. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation constitutes a violation of the right to property as enshrined in Article 1 First Protocol to the ECHR and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, as well as the EU principles of legality and legal certainty, insofar the contested Regulation allows for retroactive application.

---

(1)  OJ 2022, L 261 I, p. 1.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-4018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DEVON DALE BECKFORD, a/k/a Chubbs, a/k/a

Trubbey, a/k/a Bull, a/k/a Big Bull, a/k/a

Fats,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CR-96-66)

Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Devon Dale Beckford, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Devon Beckford appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for leave to file his appeal out of time and denying

his motion to appeal nunc pro tunc. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error.

Beckford sought to note his appeal beyond the ten-day appeal period

and beyond the thirty-day period in which the district court could

extend the appeal period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). Therefore,

the district court was without authority to extend the appeal

period. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Beckford, No. CR-96-66 (E.D. Va. Dec.

14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Donald S. Ross, Appellant, v Nestle Prepared Foods Company, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[801 NYS2d 193]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered October 7, 2004. The order granted the motion of defendant Nestle Prepared Foods Company, Inc. to dismiss the amended complaint against it.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff, an employee of Nestle Prepared Foods Company, Inc. (defendant), commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained while cleaning a machine at work. Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant seeking dismissal of the amended complaint against it based on the exclusivity provisions of Workers’ Compensation Law § 11. Plaintiff contends that the “dual capacity doctrine” should be applied herein because defendant designed the machine for the exclusive use of its employees. We reject that contention *(see generally Reich v Manhattan Boiler & Equip. Corp.,*91 NY2d 772, 779-780 [1998]; *Billy v Consolidated Mach. Tool Corp.,*51 NY2d 152, 160 [1980], *rearg denied*52 NY2d 829 [1980]; *Kubiszyn v Terex Div. of Terex Corp.,*212 AD2d 93, 96-97 [1995], *lv denied*86 NY2d 711 [1995]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52449-52450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17525]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

    Summary: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.
Summary of Proposal(s)
    (1) Collection title: Employee's Certification.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: G-346.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0140.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 11/30/2005.
    (5) Type of request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 7,560.
    (8) Total annual responses: 7,560.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 630.
    (10) Collection description: Under Section 2 of the Railroad 
Retirement Act, spouses of retired railroad employees may be entitled 
to an annuity. The collection obtains information from the employee 
about

[[Page 52450]]

the employee's previous marriages, if any, to determine if any 
impediment exists to the marriage between the employee and his or her 
spouse.
    Additional Information or Comments: Copies of the forms and 
supporting documents can be obtained from Charles Mierzwa, the agency 
clearance officer at (312-751-3363) or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d2e050c1f01081e432004081f171a0c2d1f1f0f430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbf8d3dac9d7dec895f6d2dec9c1ccdafbc9c9d995dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Comments regarding the information collection should be addressed 
to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2092 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f8aa979699949cd6b0979c998888b88a8a9ad69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eebc81808f828ac0a6818a8f9e9eae9c9c8cc0898198">[email protected]</span></a> and to the OMB 
Desk Officer for the RRB, at the Office of Management and Budget, Room 
10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

Charles Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-17525 Filed 9-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 805/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 805/2014 of 24 July 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 805/2014                     

# of 24 July 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 32(b)

 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, James M. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of Solutia Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
                  fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 9, 2005

                                                   /s/ James M. Sullivan
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   James M. Sullivan
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc.
and will be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Enviro Voraxial
Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Alberto DiBella, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/Alberto DiBella
    ------------------
    Alberto DiBella
    Principal Executive Officer

   January 31, 2008
#### Kelley Potter, Respondent, v Jeanne C. Berlin, as City Clerk of City of Oswego, et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[801 NYS2d 197]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (Norman W. Seiter, Jr., J.), entered August 18, 2004 in a declaratory judgment action. The judgment, inter alia, declared Local Law No. 4 (2003) of the City of Oswego invalid.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi*[appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 985 [1990]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Lawton, JJ.