alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
j ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 23-0005 

IN RE MOTION OF BJORN E. BRUNVAND FOR 

ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF 

MONTANA 

F 1:L" 1

MAY 3 0 2C23 

Bowen Gr-enwood 

Clerk of St:-rerne Court 

State nf P.Anntana 

ORDER 

Bjorn E. Brunvand has moved for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana 

pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions 

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on 

Character and Fitness has certified that Brunvand has provided the necessary 

documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion 

under Rule V. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Bjorn E. Brunvand may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this 36 day of May, 2023. 

05/30/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0005
e" e:- 

Justices 

2
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1225/2014Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1225/2014 of 17 November 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning            restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence            of Ukraine         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1225/2014                     

# of 17 November 2014

# implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening                        the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions                           undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine(1), and in particular Article 14(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 17 March 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

(2)The information for one person listed under Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 should be amended.

(3)Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 November 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

F. Mogherini                            

## ANNEXU.K.

The entry for the following person set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 is replaced by the entry below.

1

OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.
STATE v. Charles Edward WAMPLLER.

No. 38P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, Joel H. Brewer, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of January 2008 by Defendant for "Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of March 2008."
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 407/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 407/2013 of 23 April 2013 correcting the Spanish and the Swedish versions of Regulation (EU)            No 475/2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation            (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Accounting Standard (IAS) 1 and International            Accounting Standard (IAS) 19 (Text with EEA relevance)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 407/2013                     

# of 23 April 2013

# correcting the Spanish and the Swedish versions of Regulation (EU) No 475/2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting                        certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and                        of the Council as regards International Accounting Standard (IAS) 1 and International Accounting Standard (IAS) 19                     

# (Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application                           of international accounting standards(1) and in particular Article 3(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Errors appear in the Spanish and in the Swedish language versions of Commission Regulation (EU) No 475/2012(2), more precisely in Article 2 thereof as regards the application date of the amendments made by that Regulation to Commission                              Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008(3).

(2)The Swedish language version of that Regulation also contains some misprints.

(3)Regulation (EU) No 475/2012 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

(4)As companies are required to apply the amendments made by points 1 and 2 of Article 1 of Regulation (EU) No 475/2012, at the                              latest, as from the commencement date of their first financial year starting on or after 1 July 2012, this Regulation should                              apply retroactively from 1 July 2012.

(5)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Accounting Regulatory Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

[Concerns only the Spanish and the Swedish language versions.]

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

It shall apply from 1 July 2012.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 April 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 243, 11.9.2002, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 146, 6.6.2012, p. 1.                           

3

OJ L 320, 29.11.2008, p. 1.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-54802 of Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance Company on Form S-3, in
Registration Statement No. 333-57384 of Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance
Company on Form S-3, in Registration Statement No. 333-36192 of Charter
Municipal Mortgage Acceptance Company on Form S-3, and in Registration Statement
No. 333-55957 of Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance Company on Form S-8 of
our report dated March 12, 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance Company for the year ended December 31,
2000.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York
March 30, 2001
AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT

     The Lease Agreement made and entered into as of April 12, 1995, between
Harry Muhlschlegel and Karen Muhlschlegel ("Landlord"), and Jevic
Transportation, Inc., a New Jersey corporation ("Tenant") is hereby amended, as
of September 15, 1997, as follows:

     Section 6.2 of the Lease Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety
to read as follows:

     "6.2 Surrender. On the last day of the term hereof, or on any sooner
     termination, Tenant shall surrender the Premises to Landlord in the
     same condition as when such improvements to the Premises were
     completed, broom clean, ordinary wear and tear excepted. All
     alterations, improvements, repairs and replacements made by Tenant
     during the term of this Lease shall be removed by Tenant upon
     termination of this lease or at Landlord's option, shall remain with
     the premises when surrendered by Tenant and be deemed a part of
     Landlord's property, at no cost to Landlord. Where removal of any such
     item is required, Tenant, at Tenant's expense, shall cause same to be
     removed and the premises restored to a condition that is reasonably
     satisfactory to Landlord. Removal and restoration shall be completed
     prior to the termination of this lease. In default thereof, Landlord
     may effect said removal and repairs at Tenant's expense or treat Tenant
     as a holdover Tenant until such removal and restoration is completed to
     Landlord's reasonable satisfaction.

     In addition to the foregoing, any personal property of Tenant remaining
     at the premises upon termination of this lease (including without
     limitation Tenant's trade fixtures) shall be deemed abandoned by
     Tenant, and Landlord, at its option, may accept same as part of
     Landlord's property or cause the removal of same at Tenant's expense
     without being liable to Tenant for conversion or any claim for damages
     therefor."

                                                LANDLORD:

                                                /s/ Harry J. Muhlschlegel
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Harry J. Muhlschlegel

                                                /s/ Karen B. Muhlschlegel
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Karen B. Muhlschlegel


                                                TENANT:

                                                JEVIC TRANSPORTATION, INC.

                                                By:/s/ Harry J. Muhlschlegel
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Name:  Harry J. Muhlschlegel
                                                Title:  President
STATE v. PARKER.

No. COA06-870.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from Beaufort (03CRS3972, 03CRS3973).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2003 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

|                       |  |                                                                  |  | 
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date:  August 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D.                                    |  | 
|                       |  |                                                                  |  | 
|                       |  | Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D.,
President and Chief Executive Officer |  |
THE BOB TIMBERLAKE COLLECTION, INC. v. Marshall EDWARDS.

No. 169P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Robert J. King, III, Greensboro, Katherine A. Murphy, for Marshall Edwards.

Robert B. Smith, Jr., Lexington, J. Eric Hudson, for Timberlake Collection.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 30th day of March 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*675"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
IN RE Z.P.S.

No. COA06-563.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Burke (04J76, 04J77).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Independent Accountants' Report



Board of Directors
Community Investors Bancorp, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated statements of financial
condition, earnings, comprehensive income, and cash flows of Community Investors
Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and for the six and three month
periods then ended. The financial statements are the responsibility of the
Corporation's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated statement of
financial condition as of June 30, 2001, and the related consolidated statements
of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented herein) and in our report dated August 16, 2001, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion,
the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated statement of
financial condition as of June 30, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of financial condition from
which it has been derived.


/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP



Cincinnati, Ohio
February 14, 2002
##### 



EXHIBIT 15.2

AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

August 14, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated August 4, 2003 on our review of interim
financial information of ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) as of and
for the period ended June 30, 2003 and included in the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in
its Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-56971, 333-81383,
333-73098 and 333-85572) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-10661, 333-67376,
333-88040 and 333-88042).

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
STATE v. CROWELL.

No. COA07-954.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (05CRS54479).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,792,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,125,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,883,000
<PP&E>                                     201,261,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             248,275,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,587,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 165,599,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               248,275,000
<SALES>                                     48,424,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,424,000
<CGS>                                        7,999,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,010,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             843,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,368,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,506,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,862,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,862,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.72
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

-1- United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

July 3, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit

No. 02-11286 Summary Calendar

AVALON RESIDENTIAL CARE HOMES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

GE FINANCIAL ASSURANCE CO.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division

(3:02-CV-631-L)

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Avalon Residential Care Homes appeals from the district

court’s order granting defendant GE Financial Assurance Company’s

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for

failure to state a claim. We review the district court’s order de-2-

novo. S

. Christian Leadership Conference v. Supreme Ct. of La.

,

252 F.3d 781, 786 (5th Cir. 2001).

Avalon argues that GE violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42

U.S.C. § 3604(f), by denying Mildred Tanco’s claim under a longterm nursing home care indemnity policy for care at an Avalon

facility. Avalon does not dispute that its facility is not covered

under the policy; rather, it argues that GE was obligated by the

FHA to modify its policy to allow coverage of the Avalon home.

The relevant portion of 42 U.S.C. § 3604 states:

As made app licable by section 803 of this title and

e xcept as exempted by sections 803(b) and 807 o f this title, it shall be unlawful:

. . . (f)(1) to discrimin ate in the sale or rental, or to
otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer or renter because of a handicap of

- (A) that buyer

or renter . . . (f)(3) For purposes of this subsection, discrimination
includes - . . . (B) a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such
accommodations may be necessary to afford such a

person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling;. . .

(emphasis added). By its terms the FHA prohibits discrimination in

housing “because of a handicap.” Avalon makes no allegation of any

such discrimination, however, because it does not plead any facts

suggesting that the policy denied housing to Tanco because of her

disability. The policy in question covers (and excludes) certain

facilities in a disabled-neutral manner , and the FHA does not

require GE to modify the content of its policy to give the disabled-3-

a choice of homes not offered all policyholders. C f. McNeil v.

Time Insurance Co.

, 205 F.3d 179, 186-87 (5th Cir. 2000)

(requirement of “full and equal enjoyment of goods and services” in

Title III of the ADA simply requires businesses to offer the

disabled access to the same products offered others).

Because Avalon makes n o viable claim under the FHA, the

district court’s order dismissing this case is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

August 30, 2005.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before October 6, 2005 
to be assured of consideration.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

    OMB Number: 1513-0092.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Marks on Wine Containers.
    Description: TTB requires that wine or wine premises be identified 
by statements of information on labels or contained in marks. TTB uses 
this information to validate the receipts of excise tax revenue by the 
Federal government. Consumers are provided with adequate identifying 
information.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1 hour.
    Clearance Officer: Frank Foote, (202) 927-9347, Alcohol and Tobacco 
Tax and Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G. Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20005.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Michael A. Robinson,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-17566 Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P