alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023094EN.01006101.xml

| 13.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/61

---

Action brought on 30 January 2023 — Vobro v EUIPO — Mieszko (CHERRY Passion)

(Case T-29/23)

(2023/C 94/74)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Vobro sp. z o.o. (Brodnica, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mieszko S.A. (Warsaw, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark CHERRY Passion — Application for registration No 18 204 993

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 November 2022 in Case R 2073/2021-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | refer the case back to the EUIPO for reconsideration or |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the EUIPO for reconsideration or

| — | alter the contested decision by stating that there are no relative grounds for refusal of registration of the EU trade mark No 18 204 993 CHERRY Passion for all goods in class 30 and the trademark shall be registered; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision by stating that there are no relative grounds for refusal of registration of the EU trade mark No 18 204 993 CHERRY Passion for all goods in class 30 and the trademark shall be registered;

| — | award the costs in the applicant’s favour. |
| --- | --- |

—

award the costs in the applicant’s favour.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(l)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(l)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and the principle of legal certainty; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and the principle of legal certainty;

| — | Infringement of Articles 94(1) and 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 94(1) and 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

/s/Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief FinancialOfficer and Director

March 29,2006

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Date

----
FIPPS v. BABSON AND SMITH TRUCKING.

No. COA07-1361.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 433843).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2014 of 15 December 2014 making imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat            products originating in the People's Republic of China and Taiwan subject to registration (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2014                     

# of 15 December 2014

# making imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People's Republic of China and Taiwan subject                        to registration (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1206 of 23 July 2015 terminating the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports                                 of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People's Republic of China and repealing Implementing Regulation                                 (EU) No 1331/2014 making imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People's Republic of China                                 and Taiwan subject to registration.
# C_2023216EN.01002401.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 3 March 2023 — BG Technik cs, a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel

(Case C-129/23, BG Technik)

(2023/C 216/32)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BG Technik cs, a.s.

Defendant: Generální ředitelství cel

Questions referred

| 1. | Can an electric mobility vehicle whose maximum speed exceeds 10 km/hr, and which is equipped with a separate adjustable steering column, be classified under heading 8713 of the Combined Nomenclature, despite the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of 6 May 2011 (1) and 4 March 2015? (2) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can an electric mobility vehicle whose maximum speed exceeds 10 km/hr, and which is equipped with a separate adjustable steering column, be classified under heading 8713 of the Combined Nomenclature, despite the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of 6 May 2011 (1) and 4 March 2015? (2)

| 2. | Does Commission Regulation (EC) No 718/2009 (3) apply — aside from the vehicles directly described therein — also to an electric mobility vehicle with the following characteristics:






  — | Four wheels (the rear pair of wheels are anti-tip); |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Does Commission Regulation (EC) No 718/2009 (3) apply — aside from the vehicles directly described therein — also to an electric mobility vehicle with the following characteristics:

—

Four wheels (the rear pair of wheels are anti-tip);

| — | An adjustable and rotating seat with armrests, |
| --- | --- |

—

An adjustable and rotating seat with armrests,

| — | A horizontal platform between the front and rear sections of the mobility vehicle; |
| --- | --- |

—

A horizontal platform between the front and rear sections of the mobility vehicle;

| — | An 800 W electric motor, enabling the attainment of a speed of up to 16 km/hr and a range of up to 45 km, |
| --- | --- |

—

An 800 W electric motor, enabling the attainment of a speed of up to 16 km/hr and a range of up to 45 km,

| — | An electromagnetic brake on the rear wheels; |
| --- | --- |

—

An electromagnetic brake on the rear wheels;

| — | Closed handlebars mounted on a separate steering column that can be folded down and equipped with levers for speed selection? |
| --- | --- |

—

Closed handlebars mounted on a separate steering column that can be folded down and equipped with levers for speed selection?

---

(1)  Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (OJ 2011 C 137, p. 1).

(2)  Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (OJ 2015 C 76, p. 1).

(3)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 718/2009 of 4 August 2009 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2009 L 205, p. 7).

---
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 10.17(b)

                      AMENDMENT TO MANUFACTURING AGREEMENT

          AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT ("AMENDMENT") made as of April 1, 1999 by and
between TOYMAX INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation and its subsidiaries
(collectively, the "COMPANY") and TAI NAM INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED ("Tai Nam")
and JAUNTIWAY INVESTMENT LIMITED ("Jauntiway").

          WHEREAS, the Company, Tai Nam and Jauntiway entered into a
Manufacturing Agreement dated September 22, 1997 (the "MANUFACTURING
AGREEMENT"); and

          WHEREAS, the Company, Tai Nam and Jauntiway desire to amend the
Manufacturing Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth
herein.

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

          1. Section (6.1) of the Manufacturing Agreement is hereby amended to
extend the term thereof for an additional one (1) year from the date of this
Amendment until March 31, 2000. Thereafter, the Manufacturing Agreement shall be
automatically extended until termination by either party, upon the receipt by
the other party hereto of written notice given three months in advance of the
desired termination.

          2. Unless otherwise amended, the Agency Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect until terminated in accordance with the terms hereof. All other
terms of the Agency Agreement are hereby restated.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be
executed as of the date and year first above written.

                           TOYMAX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                           By:         /s/ Steven A. Lebensfeld
                              ---------------------------------
                                Steven A. Lebensfeld, President


                           TAI NAM INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LTD.


                           By:           /s/ David Ki Kwan Chu
                              --------------------------------
                                  David Ki Kwan Chu, President

                           JAUNTIWAY INVESTMENT LIMITED


                           By:           /s/ David Ki Kwan Chu
                              --------------------------------
                                  David Ki Kwan Chu, President
FOSTER v. UNIFI. INC.

No. COA07-1016.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 20, 2008.

Certification Date June 9, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (06CVS19007).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1180/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1180/2014 of 30 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for cod in area VIIa by vessels            flying the flag of Ireland         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1180/2014                     

# of 30 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for cod in area VIIa by vessels flying the flag of Ireland

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
STATE v. DONNELL.

No. COA07-427.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS84711, 03CRS84712).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1391/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1391/2014 of 23 December 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1391/2014                     

# of 23 December 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 December 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. HAGEN.

No. COA07-433.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Robeson (02CRS55646, 02CRS55647).

Case reported without published opinion. No error; remanded to correct clerical error.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 164 (Thursday, August 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending August 5, 2005

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.).
    The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to 
Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the 
Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. 
Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a 
tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further 
proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-2005-22057.
    Date Filed: August 4, 2005.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: August 25, 2005.
    Description: Application of Air Macau Company Limited, requesting a 
foreign air carrier permit to engage in foreign air transportation of 
property and mail between Macau and the United States.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 05-16910 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, the Chief Financial Officer of Western Sizzlin Corporation (the“Company”), hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2005 and the financial statements contained therein, fully comply with therequirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and the information contained in the Form 10-Q and the financial statementsthereto fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2005, and the periodthen ended.

 

 
| /s/ Robyn B. Mabe |   | November 14, 2005 |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------|

 

 

----
CAPPS v. NW SIGN INDUSTRIES et al.

No. 383A05-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 27, 2007.

Jared E. Gardner, Richard B. Fennell, Charlotte, for Alan Capps.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of December 2007 by Defendants for extension of time to file response to motion to dismiss:

"Motion Dismissed. By order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of December 2007."
# C_2023286EN.01001501.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/15

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Finalgarve — Sociedade de Promoção Imobiliária e Turística SA v Ministério do Planeamento e das Infraesruturas

(Case C-24/23, (1) Finalgarve)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2023/C 286/17)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Finalgarve — Sociedade de Promoção Imobiliária e Turística SA

Respondent: Ministério do Planeamento e das Infraesruturas

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Supreme Administrative Court, Portugal), by decision of 15 December 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 18.1.2023.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Combined
Unconsolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income found on pages 29 & 30 of
the company's Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such combined unconsolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-31-1998       
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998       
<CASH>                                          3,357       
<SECURITIES>                                        0       
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,893       
<ALLOWANCES>                                       55       
<INVENTORY>                                     5,399       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,398       
<PP&E>                                          1,260       
<DEPRECIATION>                                     35       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,560       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,851       
<BONDS>                                         4,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0       
<PREFERRED>                                         1       
<COMMON>                                            3       
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,705       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,560       
<SALES>                                         7,936       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,936       
<CGS>                                           6,094       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   6,094       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  537       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (450)       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   801       
<INCOME-TAX>                                      458       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0       
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0       
<CHANGES>                                           0       
<NET-INCOME>                                      343       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.09       
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.09       
                                          


</TABLE>