alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11
                            THERMOSPECTRA CORPORATION

                        Computation of Earnings per Share

                               Three Months Ended          Nine Months Ended
                            ------------------------   ------------------------
                              Sept. 28,    Sept. 30,     Sept. 28,    Sept. 30,
                                   1996         1995          1996         1995
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Computation of Primary
   Earnings per Share:

 Net Income (a)             $ 1,690,000  $ 1,217,000  $ 4,688,000   $ 3,162,000
                            -----------  -----------  -----------   -----------
 Shares:
   Weighted average
     shares outstanding      12,438,565   11,509,670   12,435,875    10,839,890

   Add: Shares issuable
        from assumed
        exercise of
        options (as
        determined by
        the application
        of the treasury
        stock method)                 -            -            -        27,810
                            -----------  -----------  -----------   -----------
   Weighted average shares
     outstanding,
     as adjusted (b)         12,438,565   11,509,670   12,435,875    10,867,700
                            -----------  -----------  -----------   -----------
 Primary Earnings per
   Share (a) / (b)          $       .14  $       .11  $       .38   $       .29
                            ===========  ===========  ===========   ===========
Exhibit 10.8 Summary of Emp. Arr. with Mark J. Cola





Exhibit 10.8




SUMMARY OF UNWRITTEN EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENT WITH MARK J. COLA




Mark J. Cola, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Sigma Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), has entered into an “at will” unwritten employment arrangement with the Company.  Under Mr. Cola’s employment arrangement, Mr. Cola’s salary is $15,000 per month, and he is eligible to receive medical and dental benefits, life insurance, and long term and short term disability coverage. Further, Mr. Cola is eligible to participate in the Company’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and 2013 Equity Incentive Plan. 












1
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 675/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 675/2014 of 18 June 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for sandeel in Union waters of            sandeel management area 2 by vessels flying the flag of Denmark         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 675/2014                     

# of 18 June 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for sandeel in Union waters of sandeel management area 2 by vessels flying the flag                        of Denmark                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 June 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3605 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3605

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal 
                       history background checks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminal History Background Checks 
Pilot Extension Act of 2008''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM.
    Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a note) is 
amended by striking ``a 66-month'' and inserting ``a 78-month''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
STATE v. Bobby Daryl McGIRT.

No. 390P06-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Floyd M. Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 641 S.E.2d 867.

*640The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of May 2007 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
In re T.H.

No. 294P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Peter Wood, David Botchin, Winston-Salem, for Mother.

Twanda Staley, Assistant County Attorney, for Forsyth County DSS.

Stuart Tetter, Carrie A. Hanger, Winston-Salem, for Guardian ad Litem.

Susan J. Hall, for Father.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Father) on the 16th day of July 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
Independent Accountants' Report



Board of Directors
Community Investors Bancorp, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated statements of financial
condition, earnings, comprehensive income, and cash flows of Community Investors
Bancorp, Inc. as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, and for the nine and three month
periods then ended. The financial statements are the responsibility of the
Corporation's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated statement of
financial condition as of June 30, 2001, and the related consolidated statements
of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented herein) and in our report dated August 16, 2001, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion,
the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated statement of
financial condition as of June 30, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of financial condition from
which it has been derived.


/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP



Cincinnati, Ohio
May 13, 2002
#### Darwin Shay, Appellant, v Dorothe C. Bower, Individually and as Trustee of the Dorothe C. Bower Living Trust, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 187]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Yates County (W. Patrick Falvey, A.J.), entered July 8, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce Harley, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 909]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered August 19, 2003, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         ALL-AMERICAN SPORTPARK, INC.
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on
Form 10-QSB of All-American SportPark, Inc. for the quarter ending June 30,
2004:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
All-American SportPark, Inc.


Dated:  August 19, 2004




/s/ Ron Boreta
Ron Boreta
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and
Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to All-American SportPark, Inc.
and will be retained by All-American SportPark, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Exhibit





	
			
	
	 
	Daniel S. Glaser
President and Chief Executive Officer
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1166 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
212 345 4874 Fax 212 345 6676
dan.glaser@mmc.com
www.mmc.com














Exhibit 10.5


June 10, 2016


Peter Zaffino
[Address]
[City, State Zip Code]


Subject:    Terms of Employment


Dear Peter:


This second amendment to the Letter Agreement, dated November 21, 2013, between you and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (the “Initial Letter Agreement”), as amended on June 6, 2014 (the “First Amendment” and, together with the Initial Letter Agreement, the “Letter Agreement”), revises the terms and conditions of your employment by Marsh LLC.  The Letter Agreement will continue to govern your employment except as specified below:  


		
	1.
	Your title is Chairman of the Risk and Insurance Services segment and Chief Executive Officer of Marsh LLC.  




		
	2.
	Exhibit A to the Letter Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the attached Exhibit A.




The terms of this second amendment are effective as of May 18, 2016.  Please acknowledge your agreement with the terms of the Letter Agreement, as amended by this second amendment, by signing and dating the enclosed copy and returning it to me on or before June 24, 2016.


Sincerely,


/s/ Daniel S. Glaser
Daniel S. Glaser
President and Chief Executive Officer
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.


Accepted and Agreed:


/s/ Peter Zaffino
(Signature)


06/24/16
(Date)







June 10, 2016
Peter Zaffino
Page 2

















Exhibit A


	
		
	Board or Committee Memberships
	Ÿ New York Police & Fire Widows’ &
     Children’s Benefit Fund
Ÿ National Advisory Board of Youth INC
Ÿ The Michael J. Fox Foundation

	Annual Base Salary
	$1,000,000

	Annual Target Bonus Opportunity
	Bonus awards are discretionary.  Target bonus of $2,250,000 commencing with the 2016 performance year (awarded in 2017).  Actual bonus may range from 0% - 200% of target, based on achievement of individual performance objectives, the Risk and Insurance Services segment’s performance and/or Marsh & McLennan Companies’ performance as Marsh & McLennan Companies may establish from time to time.  

	Annual Target Long Term Incentive Opportunity
	Long-term incentive awards are discretionary.  Target award of $3,750,000 (based on grant date fair value), commencing with the award made in 2017.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 33

AN ACT

To redesignate the Office for Vocational and Adult Education 

as the Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 33 ES

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE OFFICE OF VOCA2 TIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION. 

3 (a) REDESIGNATION.—Section 206 of the Depart4 ment of Education Organization Act (20 U.S.C. 3416) is 

5 amended—

6 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘OFFICE

7 OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION’’ and in8 serting ‘‘OFFICE OF CAREER, TECHNICAL, AND

9 ADULT EDUCATION’’; 

10 (2) in the first sentence—

11 (A) by striking ‘‘Office of Vocational and 

12 Adult Education’’ and inserting ‘‘Office of Ca13 reer, Technical, and Adult Education’’; and 

14 (B) by striking ‘‘Assistant Secretary for 

15 Vocational and Adult Education’’ and inserting 

16 ‘‘Assistant Secretary for Career, Technical, and 

17 Adult Education’’; and 

18 (3) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘voca19 tional and adult education’’ each place the term ap20 pears and inserting ‘‘career, technical, and adult 

21 education’’. 

22 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

23 (1) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ORGANIZA24 TION ACT.—The Department of Education Organi25 zation Act (as amended in subsection (a)) (20 

26 U.S.C. 3401 et seq.) is further amended—
3

•S 33 ES

1 (A) in section 202—

2 (i) in subsection (b)(1)(C), by striking 

3 ‘‘Assistant Secretary for Vocational and 

4 Adult Education’’ and inserting ‘‘Assistant 

5 Secretary for Career, Technical, and Adult 

6 Education’’; and 

7 (ii) in subsection (h), by striking ‘‘As8 sistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult 

9 Education’’ each place the term appears 

10 and inserting ‘‘Assistant Secretary for Ca11 reer, Technical, and Adult Education’’; 

12 and 

13 (B) in the table of contents in section 1, 

14 by striking the item relating to section 206 and 

15 inserting the following:

‘‘Sec. 206. Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education.’’.

16 (2) CARL D. PERKINS CAREER AND TECHNICAL

17 EDUCATION ACT OF 2006.—Section 114(b)(1) of the 

18 Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education 

19 Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2324(b)(1)) is amended by 

20 striking ‘‘Office of Vocational and Adult Education’’ 
4

•S 33 ES

1 and inserting ‘‘Office of Career, Technical, and 

2 Adult Education’’. 

Passed the Senate May 22, 2007. 

Attest:

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 33

AN ACT

To redesignate the Office for Vocational and Adult 

Adult Education.Education as the Office of Career, Technical, and
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Covad Communications Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles E. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. COVAD COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.By:

/s/
Charles E. HoffmanCharles E. HoffmanDate: February 28, 2007
    
    President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-3) and related Prospectuses of EOP Operating Limited Partnership forthe registration of:
• $4.0 billion of debt securities and warrants exercisable for debt securities(registration statement no. 333-58976);
• $325.0 million of senior exchangeable notes (registration statement no. 333-47754);
• $2.0 billion of debt securities and warrants exercisable for debt securities(registration statement no. 333-43530);
• $2.0 billion of debt securities and warrants exercisable for debt securities(registration statement no. 333-58689);
• and the registration statement (Form S-3MEF) of EOP Operating Limited Partnershipfor the registration of $60.0 million of debt securities and warrants exercisablefor debt securities (registration statement no. 333-42928),
of our report dated February 5, 2004, except for Note 26, as to which the dateis March 5, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of EOPOperating Limited Partnership included in the Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2003.
Chicago, Illinois
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      BALANCE SHTS, INCOME STATEMTS,  & CASH FLOWS
     
</LEGEND>
        
       
<S>                                          <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         7,947,456
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,529,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                   428,000
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               54,579,523
<PP&E>                                         35,033,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,420,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,423,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          98,344,289
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    24,065,190
<COMMON>                                       13,551
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,605,725)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (6,556,174)
<SALES>                                        64,738,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               66,331,419
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  86,676,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             637,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,983,045)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,983,045)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00401-CR

Carl Wayne Truan, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 7987, HONORABLE GUILFORD L. JONES III, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Carl Wayne Truan was placed on deferred adjudication community

supervision after he pleaded guilty to the unauthorized use of a vehicle. See Tex. Penal Code

Ann. § 31.07 (West 1994). The court later revoked supervision, adjudicated appellant guilty, and

assessed punishment at imprisonment for two years and a $5000 fine.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App.

1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d

137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant
2

was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief

has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the

appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

____________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: March 8, 2001

Do Not Publish