alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 23(c)

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-34587, 333-34593, 333-34683, 333-35689, 333-51081, 333-74463, and
333-39972 on Form S-8 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-75812, 333-89818,
and 333-99705 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 23, 2007 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating
to a change in accounting principle) related to the financial statements of
the Flexsys Group as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Solutia Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Brussels, Belgium
March 23, 2007

/s/ Geert Verstraeten
---------------------
DELOITTE REVISEURS D'ENTREPRISES SC SFD SCRL
Represented by Geert Verstraeten
Partner
**Exhibit 31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Joseph J. Raymond, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 of Stratus Services Group, Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date:
December 22, 2004  /s/ Joseph J. RaymondJoseph J. RaymondChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 24, 2020

No. 04-20-00171-CV

IN RE Eugenio VILLARREAL

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On March 19, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and, on March 20, 

2020, a motion for stay pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. This court 

believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further 

consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file 

a response to the petition in this court no later than April 9, 2020. Any such response must 

conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

Relator’s request for a stay is GRANTED. All proceedings in the underlying case are 

STAYED pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. 

It is so ORDERED on March 24, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016CVT000921-D3, styled Tina Botello v. Eugenio Villarreal, pending 

in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo presiding.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-111540, 333-115667, 333-120092 and 333-117082) and in the related Prospectuses, and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-111393, 333-109006, 333-83804, 333-58518, 333-118178,333-114642) of American Access Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary of our report dated January 30, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of American Access Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary which appears in this Annual Report onForm 10-KSB of American Access Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

**RACHLIN COHEN & HOLTZ LLP**

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 

March 31, 2006
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------



                                                              April 10, 2003


United States Securities and Exchange Commission

RE:      "EVALUATION OF THE INTERESTS OF COMPTON PETROLEUM CORPORATION"
         EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2003

Dear Sir:

                  We refer to our reports auditing estimates of the natural gas,
natural gas liquids and conventional oil reserves attributable to Compton
Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") as of January 1, 2003 (collectively, the
"Reports").

                  We hereby consent to references to our name in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 40-F to be filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We also confirm that we have read the Annual Information Form and that we have
no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information
contained in it that are derived from the Reports or that are within our
knowledge as a result of the services we performed in connection with such
Reports.

                                               Yours truly,

                                               Outtrim Szabo Associates Ltd.

                                               /s/ Attila A. Szabo
                                               -----------------------------
                                               Attila A. Szabo, P.Eng.
                                               Senior Vice-President
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vivian Chu, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

           (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Vivian Chu
Chief Financial Officer
May 29, 2003
**Exhibit 10.1****AGREEMENT**     This Agreement (this “Agreement”), effective as of September 1, 2005, is made by and betweenVought Aircraft Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Kenneth W. Cannestra(the “Director”).     WHEREAS, the Director is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”);     WHEREAS, the Company and the Director wish to discontinue the Director’s service as a memberof the Board;     WHEREAS, the Director has been entitled to receive certain compensation from the Company inconnection with his service as a member of the Board;     WHEREAS, the Director has been granted certain options for common stock of the Company underthe terms of the Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Option Plan of Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.(the “Stock Option”); and     WHEREAS, the Company and the Director mutually desire to settle and forever resolve any andall obligations that may exist regarding compensation payable to the Director as a result of hisservice as a member of the Board.     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and undertakings contained herein, and forother good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Companyand the Director hereby agree as follows:     1. Resignation of Directorship. Effective as of September 1, 2005, the Directorhereby resigns his membership on the Board.     2. Payment by Company. The Company shall pay the Director an amount of cash equal to tenthousand dollars ($10,000), subject to reduction for all applicable withholding taxes.     3. Acceleration of Stock Options. That portion of the Director’s Stock Option whichremains eligible for vesting on December 31, 2005 will be accelerated and immediately vested.     4. Full Settlement of All Obligations. The Director acknowledges and agrees that theforegoing consideration represents settlement in full of all outstanding obligations owed to theDirector by the Company with respect to all compensation to which the Director may otherwise beentitled in connection with his service as a member of the Board. Nothing in this Agreement shallaffect any rights that Director may otherwise have as a stockholder of the Company as set forth inany Stockholders’ Agreement, or, except as described above, any rights that the Director may havepursuant to any Stock Option Agreement to which he is a party.
 

 
Nothing in this agreement shall affect any rights that the Director may have to indemnificationpursuant to the terms of the By-Laws of the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Director have caused this Agreement to be executedeffective as of the date first above written.      **VOUGHT AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                  13,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0                   1,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   7,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                     340
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  36,542
<PP&E>                                               0                 321,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                  14,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 358,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  24,513
<BONDS>                                              0                 233,705
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                     171
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                  95,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 358,793
<SALES>                                         30,398                  85,460
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,398                  85,460
<CGS>                                           20,453                  60,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,959                  98,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    41                     138
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   103                     161
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,962                  11,058
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,256)                (22,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,256)                (22,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,256)                (22,922)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.37)                  (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.37)                  (1.34)


</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 27, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-2550

Lower Tribunal No. 11-26509 B

________________



### Theodore Griffin

, Petitioner,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction

– Habeas Corpus.

Theodore Griffin, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General

, for respondent.

Before SHEPHERD, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

Following review of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, it is ordered that

said petition is hereby denied.ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Furthermore, as it appears that Theodore Griffin has submitted multiple pro

se post-conviction appeals, 1 we order Mr. Griffin to show good cause within thirty

(30) days why this Court should not prohibit him from submitting further pro se

appeals, petitions, motions or other proceedings relating to his criminal sentencing

in circuit court case number 11-26509, unless such pleadings are signed by an

attorney who is a duly licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing. After

this order to show cause and giving Mr. Griffin an opportunity to respond, this

Court may prevent such further filings. We must balance Mr. Griffin’s pro se right

to access the courts with the Court’s need to devote its finite resources to

legitimate appeals, recognizing the seriousness of sanctions when the litigant is a

criminal defendant. State v. Spencer

, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999).

1 A non-exhaustive list of pro se post-conviction appeals filed by the defendant

include: 3D11-3097; 3D12-251; 3D12-1309; 3D12-2000; 3D12-3172; 3D13-97;

3D13-1164; 3D13-3093; 3D14-1831; 3D15-952; 3D15-1721; 3D15-2512; 3D15-

2550; and 3D15-2921.

2
STATE of North Carolina v. James Jordan COBB, III.

No. 447PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2006.

William L. Osteen, Jr., Greensboro, for Cobb.

Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 17th day of August 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th day of August 2005 by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2006."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in *386the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
# Council Decision of 30 July 2014 appointing a Belgian member of the Committee of the Regions (2014/520/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 30 July 2014

# appointing a Belgian member of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/520/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Karl-Heinz                              LAMBERTZ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Mr Karl-Heinz LAMBERTZ, *Präsident des Parlamentes der Deutschsprachigen Gemeinschaft Belgiens*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the use in this Registration Statement No. 333-41714, No. 333-69334, No. 333-71866, and No. 333-139999 on Form S-8 of Transgenomic, Inc. and subsidiary, of our report dated February 24, 2010 relatingto our audits of the consolidated financial statements appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transgenomic Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. 

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP 

Omaha, Nebraska

February 24, 2010
MARVEN L. POINDEXTER, INC. v. BOARDWALK, LLC; Miller Building Corporation; Deborah C. Lee; Shannon W. Myers; John C. Czerwinski and wife, Jeanette M. Czerwinski; Manish G. Patel; Allen H. Van Dyke and wife, Perry G. Van Dyke; George Cornelson and wife, Kimberlye F. Cornelson; Afshin Ghazi; and Charles H. Huntley.

No. 443PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 11, 2008.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 178 N.C.App. 562, 631 S.E.2d 893 (2006), affirming an order entered on 14 April 2005 by Judge Larry Ford in Superior Court, Iredell County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 September 2007.

Erwin and Eleazer, P.A., by L. Holmes Eleazer, Jr., Fenton T. Erwin, Jr., and Lex M. Erwin, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant.

Johnston, Allison & Hord, P.A., by Martin L. White and Greg C. Ahlum, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee Boardwalk, LLC, and Horack, Talley, Pharr & Lowndes, by D. Christopher Osborn, Charlotte, for defendant-appellees individual unit owners.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in *Carolina Building Services' Windows & Doors, Inc. v. Boardwalk, LLC,* ___ N.C. ___, 658 S.E.2d 924, 2008 WL 1700121 (2008) (No. 444PA06), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed as to the issue before this Court on discretionary review. The remaining issues addressed by the Court of Appeals are not before this Court, and its decision as to those issues remains undisturbed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
STATE v. Mario Lynn PHILLIPS.

No. 48A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 6, 2008.

Maureen Krueger, Garland N. Yates, District Attorneys, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of February 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time for Court Reporter to Prepare the Transcripts:

*2"Motion Allowed. Court reporter shall have up to and including the 21st day of March 2008 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel. By order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of February 2008."
ROBERTSON v. ROBERTSON.

No. COA06-1448.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Stokes (02CVD147).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed as to equitable distribution judgment; interim equitable distribution order VACATED.
STATE v. Jerry Wayne BASS.

No. 134P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of March 2007 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review G.S. 7A-31":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2.29

            SCHEDULE OF MATERIAL DIFFERENCES AMONG PERCENTAGE LEASES

         The following lists of material differences between the Percentage
Lease filed as Exhibit 10.2 and the Percentage Lease identified by the Exhibit
number below and is being filed pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Exhibit                                                                Annual Base               Percentage Rent
Number                   Percentage Lease Description                      Rent                     Formula
------            ---------------------------------------------        -----------           ----------------------
<S>               <C>                                                  <C>                   <C>
10.2.29           Lease Agreement dated as of May 6, 1997              $1,586,700            35.55% of room revenue
                  by and between Sunstone Hotel Investors,                                   up to $371,941, plus
                  L.P. as lessor and Sunstone Hotel Properties,                              60% of room revenue
                  Inc., as lessee, for the Fountain Suites                                   in excess of $371,941
                  located in Sacramento, California.                                         plus 5% of food and
                                                                                             beverage revenue, plus
                                                                                             100% of sublease and
                                                                                             concession revenue and
                                                                                             other net revenues.
</TABLE>