alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3697 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3697

 To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act to require approval 
by the Congress for certain expenditures for the Troubled Asset Relief 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2008

  Mr. Inhofe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act to require approval 
by the Congress for certain expenditures for the Troubled Asset Relief 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR TARP OBLIGATIONS.

    Section 115 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 
(division A of Public Law 110-343) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3)--
                    (A) by striking ``unless there is enacted, within 
                15 calendar days of'' and inserting ``until there is 
                enacted, not later than 15 calendar days after''; and
                    (B) by striking ``, effective upon the expiration 
                of such 15-day period,''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading, by striking 
                ``Disapproval'' and inserting ``Approval'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``disapproving'' 
                and inserting ``approving'';
                    (C) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking 
                ``disapproval'' and inserting ``approval''; and
                    (D) in paragraph (2)(D), by striking 
                ``disapproves'' and inserting ``approves''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2.27

            SCHEDULE OF MATERIAL DIFFERENCES AMONG PERCENTAGE LEASES

            The following lists of material differences between the Percentage
Lease filed as Exhibit 10.2 and the Percentage Lease identified by the Exhibit
number below and is being filed pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
  Exhibit           Percentage Lease           Annual Base       Percentage Rent
  Number               Description                Rent               Formula
  ------               -----------                ----               -------
<S>          <C>                                <C>         <C>
  10.2.27    Lease Agreement dated as of        $1,102,600  40.2% of room revenue up
             March 10, 1997 by and between                  to $2,742,786, plus 68% of
             Sunstone Hotel Investors, L.P., as             room revenue in excess of
             lessor and Sunstone Hotel                      $2,742,786 plus 5% of
             Properties, Inc., as lessee, for the           food and beverage
             Hawthorne Suites Hotel located in              revenue, plus 100% of
             Kent, Washington.                              sublease and concession
                                                            revenue and other net
                                                            revenues.
</TABLE>
STATE v. COLE.

No. COA06-1595.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS99364, 03CRS24682).

Case reported without published opinion. Remanded for a new sentencing hearing.
**Exhibit      21**

**Subsidiaries      of the Registrant**

| **Name**                                                     | **Jurisdiction**                        | **Percent                  Owned** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                                         |                                    |                               |
| Partner                  Success Holdings Limited            | British                  Virgin Islands | 100                                |
|                                                         |                                    |                               |
| Shanghai                  Chengtong Precision Strip Co, Ltd. | China                                   | 100                                |
|                                                         |                                    |                               |
| Shanghai                  Tuorong Precision Strip Co., Ltd.  | China                                   | 100                                |
|                                                         |                                    |                               |
| Blessford                  International Limited             | British                  Virgin Islands | 100                                |
|                                                         |                                    |                               |
| Shanghai                  Blessford Alloy Co., Ltd.          | China                                   | 100                                |

----
STATE v. BUCK.

No. COA07-471.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Pitt (04CRS58151, 04CRS58266, 04CRS15544, 04CRS15545).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error but remanded for correction of clerical errors.
STATE of North Carolina v. Harold Ray ESTES.

No. 543P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

J. Matthew Martin, Harry C. Martin, Hillsborough, for Estes.

David N. Kirkman, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 651 S.E.2d 598.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th day of November 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of November 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
WRIGHT v. WRIGHT.

No. S07F0011.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

May 2, 2007.

Judgments Affirmed Without Opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,427,598
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            17,685,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,523,755
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,803,250
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,416,691
<LOANS>                                     58,603,515
<ALLOWANCE>                                    460,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,401,405
<DEPOSITS>                                 107,827,106
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            417,666
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       947,294
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,146,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             114,338,451
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,302,937
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              660,561
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                10,343
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,973,841
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,145,739
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,289,083
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          684,758
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   30,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,216,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (406,287)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (406,287)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.49
<LOANS-NON>                                     69,444
<LOANS-PAST>                                   253,624
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               506,635
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 (97,045)
<RECOVERIES>                                    21,105
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              460,695
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           460,695
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8)  pertaining to the OraLabs  Holding Corp.  1997 Stock Plan and in the
related  Prospectus,  of our report dated February 24, 1998 on the  consolidated
financial statements of OraLabs Holding Corp., and of our report dated March 12,
1998 on the financial statements of SSI Capital Corp., included in the Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.


                                             Very truly yours,



                                             /s/  Schumacher & Associates, Inc.
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Schumacher & Associates, Inc.
                                             Certified Public Accountants
                                             12835 E. Arapahoe Road
                                             Tower II, Suite 110
                                             Englewood, Colorado 80112

Denver, Colorado

March 30, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE 
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,922,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,799,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,576,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,520,000
<PP&E>                                     215,044,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,160,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             338,979,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,326,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       196,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 173,073,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               338,979,000
<SALES>                                     19,170,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,170,000
<CGS>                                        2,816,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,121,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,799,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,206,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   860,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,346,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,346,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        


</TABLE>
STATE v. GROCE.

No. COA07-507.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (05CRS1701).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part and remanded in part.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jemaul GREEN.

No. 8P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Nora Henry Hargrove, for Green.

Tiare B. Smiley, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th day of January 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of January 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*490"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
WILLIAMS v. HOMEQ SERVICING CORP.

No. 382A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 30, 2007.

John F. Bloss, Greensboro, for Williams.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th day of August 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (HomEq Servicing Corp.) shall have up to and including the 5th day of October 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of August 2007."
#### In the Matter of Kevin Seldon, Appellant, v Raymond Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

[801 NYS2d 306]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola A. Soto, J.), entered November 18, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondent Board of Trustees, dated August 21, 2002, denying petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In view of the objective medical evidence demonstrating that *841petitioner’s dilated cardiomyopathy was not accompanied by underlying stress-related coronary artery disease or hypertension, and the conclusions of various medical experts that petitioner’s disabling condition was of unknown origin or might possibly have been caused by a viral illness, the statutory presumption set forth in General Municipal Law § 207-k was adequately rebutted. In this posture, the determination of respondent Board of Trustees that the condition was not job-related is not arbitrary and capricious *(see Matter of Vallas v Saftr,*304 AD2d 353 [2003]; *Tardibuono v Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Police Dept., Art. II Pension Fund,*240 AD2d 327 [1997]). Concur—Marlow, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
Exhibit 24(a)
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
   th
 /s/ Jeffry N. Quinn
    
    /s/ James P. HeffernanJeffry N. Quinn, Chairman of the Board,
    
    James P. Heffernan, DirectorChief Executive Officer, and President(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ James M. Sullivan
    
    /s/ W. Thomas JagodinskiJames M. Sullivan, Executive Vice President
    
    W. Thomas Jagodinski, Directorand Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)/s/ Timothy J. Spihlman
    
    /s/ J. Patrick MulcahyTimothy J. Spihlman, Vice President and Controller
    
    J. Patrick Mulcahy, Director(Principal Accounting Officer)/s/ William T. Monahan
    
    /s/ Robert A. PeiserWilliam T. Monahan, Lead Director
    
    Robert A. Peiser, Director/s/ Eugene I. Davis
    
    /s/ Gregory C. SmithEugene I. Davis, Director
    
    Gregory C. Smith, Director/s/ Robert K. deVeer, Jr.Robert K. deVeer, Jr., Director
FELTS v. FELTS.

No. COA07-967.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 2, 2008.

Certification Date September 22, 2008.

Appeal from Cabarrus (01CVD2117).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. MURPHY.

No. COA07-1164.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Wake (05CRS122232).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
Exhibit 32






CERTIFICATION




By
signing below, each of the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in
his or her capacity as an officer of LSB Financial Corp. (the “Registrant”) that
(i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in
this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results
of operations of the Registrant for such period.









Date: 
      August
      14, 2008
            
            /s/
            Randolph
      F. WilliamsRandolph
      F. WilliamsPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate: 
      August 14, 2008
            
            /s/
            Mary
      Jo DavidMary
      Jo DavidVice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer







A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to LSB Financial Corp. and will be retained by LSB Financial
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
STATE v. NICHOLS.

No. COA07-871.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from Davidson (04CRS57985, 04CRS58307).

Cases reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         565,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,413,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                   349,655
<INVENTORY>                                    329,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,237,742
<PP&E>                                      13,450,558
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,108,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,505,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,490,637
<BONDS>                                      6,271,842
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,799
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,886,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,505,892
<SALES>                                     34,558,596
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,030,134
<CGS>                                       27,668,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,973,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,304,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                35,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             574,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,482,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                   566,595
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            916,204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   916,204
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8153

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SYLVESTER KELLY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior 

District Judge. (1:06-cr-00297-CMH-3)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sylvester Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, 

Karen Ledbetter Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Dennis Michael Fitzpatrick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sylvester Kelly appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion to reconsider the court’s earlier order 

ruling on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a 

reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. 

Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-46 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that 

district court lacked authority to grant defendant’s motion to 

reconsider, filed eight months after the district court’s order 

ruling on original § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.01
***CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER***
     I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc. as managingoperator, of The Campbell Fund Trust, certify that (i) the Form 10K for the year ended December 31,2004 of The Campbell Fund Trust fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10K for the yearended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of The Campbell Fund Trust.         THE CAMPBELL FUND TRUST    By: Campbell & Company, Inc., managing operator          By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland          Bruce L. Cleland