alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employee Benefits Security Administration

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 131st open meeting of the full Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans will be held on September 21, 2005. 

The session will take place in Room S 4215 B-C, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 4 p.m. to approximately 5 p.m., is for members to be updated on activities of the Employee Benefits Security Administration and for the chairs of this year's Working Groups to provide progress reports on their individual study topics.

                    Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written statement may do so by submitting 25 copies on or before September 14, 2005 to Larry Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite N-5623, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Statements also may be submitted electronically to                     *good.larry@dol.gov.*                     Statements received on or before September 14, 2005 will be included in the record of the meeting. Individuals or representatives of organizations wishing to address the Advisory Council should forward their requests to the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 693-8668. Oral presentations will be limited to 10 minutes, time permitting, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities who need special accommodations should contact Larry Good by September 14 at the address indicated.                

Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of August, 2005. 

Ann L. Combs, 

Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration.

[FR Doc. 05-17309  Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,416
<SECURITIES>                                23,755,407
<RECEIVABLES>                                  632,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,404,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          634,284
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,769,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,404,192
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               734,545
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                679,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                   679,882
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            679,882
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   679,882
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3343 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a disclosure 

requirement under the Medicare program for physicians referring for 

imaging services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2008 

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a disclosure requirement under the Medicare program 

for physicians referring for imaging services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Imaging Dis5 closure Sunshine Act of 2008’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 3343 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT UNDER THE MEDI2 CARE PROGRAM FOR PHYSICIANS REFER3 RING FOR IMAGING SERVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1877(b)(2) of the Social 

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395nn(b)(2)) is amended by 

6 adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Such re7 quirements shall, with respect to magnetic resonance im8 aging, computed tomography, positron emission tomog9 raphy, and any other designated health services specified 

10 under subsection (h)(6)(D) that the Secretary determines 

11 appropriate, include a requirement that the referring phy12 sician inform the individual in writing at the time of the 

13 referral that the individual may obtain the services for 

14 which the individual is being referred from a person other 

15 than a person described in subparagraph (A)(i) and pro16 vide such individual with a written list of suppliers (as 

17 defined in section 1861(d)) who furnish such services in 

18 the area in which such individual resides.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to services furnished on or after 

21 January 1, 2010. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# Official Journal C 279/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 279 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 618 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 279

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 618 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2018/C 279/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1 | 1 |
| 2018/C 279/02 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1 | 4 |
| 2018/C 279/03 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of Eurojust for the financial year 2017 — amending budget No 1 | 9 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2018/C 279/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1

1

2018/C 279/02

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1

4

2018/C 279/03

Statement of revenue and expenditure of Eurojust for the financial year 2017 — amending budget No 1

9

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN RE D.B., Jr.

No. COA07-928.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 18, 2007.

Certification Date January 7, 2008.

Appeal from Harnett (07J65).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael RANKINS.

No. 271P99-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Michael Rankins, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*27*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th day of October 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."
Joseph O'MARA, a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Larry Reavis; and Janella O'Mara v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES; et al.

No. 414PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Wade E. Byrd, Fayetteville, Sally A. Lawing, Greensboro, for O'Mara.

Tamura D. Coffey, Linda L. Helms, Winston-Salem, Amanda D. Palmieri, for Wake Forest Health Sciences, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 646 S.E.2d 400.

*ORDER*

The Court allows plaintiffs' petition for discretionary review as to plaintiffs' issues Number 1 and Number 2:

(1) Does a medical malpractice expert's reliance on a national standard of care automatically disqualify the witness from testifying under G.S. § 90-21.12?; and (2) When a medical malpractice expert testifies to the existence of a national standard of care, and no evidence is presented regarding the congruity between that national standard and the community standard under G.S. § 90-21.12, should it be presumed that the community standard differs from, or instead conforms to, the national one?

Plaintiffs' petition for discretionary review as to the remaining issues is denied.

Plaintiffs shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3375 

To prohibit the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate 

commerce of novelty lighters, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2008 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit the introduction or delivery for introduction into 

interstate commerce of novelty lighters, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Children from 

5 Dangerous Lighters Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) Lighters are inherently dangerous products 

9 containing flammable fuel. 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3375 IS

1 (2) If lighters are used incorrectly or used by 

2 children, dangerous and damaging consequences may 

3 result. 

4 (3) Novelty lighters are easily mistaken by chil5 dren and adults as children’s toys or as common 

6 household items. 

7 (4) Novelty lighters have been the cause of 

8 many personal injuries to children and adults and 

9 property damage throughout the United States. 

10 SEC. 3. NOVELTY LIGHTER DEFINED. 

11 In this Act, the term ‘‘novelty lighter’’ means a device 

12 typically used for the igniting or lighting of cigarettes, ci13 gars, or pipes that has a toy-like appearance, has enter14 taining audio or visual effects, or resembles in any way 

15 in form or function an item that is commonly recognized 

16 as appealing, attractive, or intended for use by children 

17 of 10 years of age or younger, including such a device that 

18 takes toy-like physical forms, including toy animals, car19 toon characters, cars, boats, airplanes, common household 

20 items, weapons, cell phones, batteries, food, beverages, 

21 musical instruments, and watches. 

22 SEC. 4. BAN ON NOVELTY LIGHTERS. 

23 (a) BANNED HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE.—A novelty 

24 lighter shall be treated as a banned hazardous substance 

25 as defined in section 2 of the Federal Hazardous SubVerDate Aug 31 2005 01:39 Aug 02, 2008 Jkt 069002 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3375.IS S3375

erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•S 3375 IS

1 stances Act (15 U.S.C. 1261) and the prohibitions set out 

2 in section 4 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 1263) shall apply to 

3 novelty lighters. 

4 (b) APPLICATION.—Subsection (a) applies to a nov5 elty lighter— 

6 (1) manufactured on or after January 1, 1980; 

7 and 

8 (2) that is not considered by the Consumer 

9 Product Safety Commission to be an antique or an 

10 item with significant artistic value. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-30848

Summary Calendar

CANCIANO MARQUEZ-MAYORGA,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

J. S. WILLIS,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:18-CV-96

Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Canciano Marquez-Mayorga, federal prisoner # 57155-018, appeals the 

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the computation of his

federal sentences by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). Marquez-Mayorga’s

judgment in the District of Vermont ordered the prison term imposed therein 

to be retroactively concurrent with an earlier prison term imposed in the 

Middle District of Florida.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 28, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-30848 Document: 00515176818 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/28/2019
No. 18-30848

2

In concluding that Marquez-Mayorga’s Vermont sentence could not be 

retroactively concurrent with his Florida sentence, the district court here 

reasoned that the earliest date a federal sentence may commence is the date 

that it is imposed, even if it is ordered to run concurrently with a sentence 

already being served. We review the district court’s decision de novo. See

Garland v. Roy, 615 F.3d 391, 396 (5th Cir. 2010). Marquez-Mayorga does not 

brief any argument contesting the district court’s reliance on 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3585(a) and United States v. Flores, 616 F.2d 840, 841 (5th Cir. 1980), and he 

does not dispute that a provision in BOP Program Statement 5880.28 provides 

that a federal term of imprisonment may not commence earlier than the date 

it is imposed. See U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons Program 

Statement No. 5880.28, p. 1-13. He has thus waived any such arguments. See 

Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

Instead, Marquez-Mayorga argues only that the BOP failed to comply 

with the requirements of another provision in BOP Program Statement 

5880.28 pertaining to the award of time credit. See U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 

Federal Bureau of Prisons Program Statement No. 5880.28, p. 1-27. Because 

he did not raise this argument in the district court, we do not consider it for 

the first time on appeal. See Wilson v. Roy, 643 F.3d 433, 435 n.1 (5th Cir. 

2011).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-30848 Document: 00515176818 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/28/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         434,689
<SECURITIES>                                28,512,147
<RECEIVABLES>                                  701,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,437
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,687,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          624,579
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,062,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,687,093
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               367,844
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               329,815
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                329,815
<INCOME-TAX>                                   329,815
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            329,815
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   329,815
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

                      FLEMINGTON PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

                         EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION


                                                                YEAR ENDED
                                                              JULY 31, 2000
                                                          ---------------------
                                                                  BASIC
                                                          ---------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                   4,447,163
DILUTIVE EFFECT OF STOCK PERFORMANCE PLANS (1)                               --
                                                          ---------------------
  TOTAL                                                               4,447,163

NET INCOME (LOSS)                                                    (1,179,000)
                                                          ---------------------
EARNINGS PER SHARE                                                         (.27)
                                                          ---------------------

                                                                YEAR ENDED
                                                              JULY 31, 1999
                                                          ---------------------
                                                                  BASIC
                                                          ---------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                   3,877,300
DILUTIVE EFFECT OF STOCK PERFORMANCE PLANS (1)                               --
                                                          ---------------------
  TOTAL                                                               3,877,300

NET INCOME (LOSS)                                                    (1,367,000)
                                                          ---------------------
EARNINGS PER SHARE                                                         (.35)
                                                          ---------------------


         (1)      SINCE THE COMPANY HAS REPORTED A LOSS FOR EACH PERIOD, NO
                  POTENTIAL SHARES FROM STOCK PERFORMANCE PLANS HAVE BEEN
                  PRESENTED, AS THEIR EFFECT WOULD BE ANTI-DILUTIVE.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1158/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1158/2014 of 29 October 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1158/2014                     

# of 29 October 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.