alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Guidant Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Keith E. Brauer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Keith E. Brauer
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000930548
<NAME>                        RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         31,142
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               268,808
<PP&E>                                         2,378,953
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (237,028)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,904,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,543
<BONDS>                                        1,459,438
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    152
<COMMON>                                       507
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,111,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,904,333
<SALES>                                        107,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,659
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  44,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             23,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                23,167
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            23,167
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,446
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .28



</TABLE>
BRADLEY v. MISSION HOSPITALS.

No. 25PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

David Gantt, Asheville, for Bradley.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 638 S.E.2d 254.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of June 2007 by Defendant (Mission Health System) to Withdraw Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,977
<PP&E>                                         544,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                 293,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,205
<BONDS>                                        287,959
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,600
<COMMON>                                         1,260
<OTHER-SE>                                    (81,785)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,239
<SALES>                                         15,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,668
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,334
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,986)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,986)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023035EN.01007701.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/77

---

Action brought on 5 December 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce (Shoes)

(Case T-758/22)

(2023/C 35/97)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce Co. Ltd (Quanzhou, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 8 367 742-0013

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 September 2022 in Case R 1876/2021-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 6(1)(a) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

p0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

148746

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148746

COA: 319179

Oakland CC: 2012-243435-FC

WILLIAM EARL CLEMONS III,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 13, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# **Exhibit 32.1**

 

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

#  

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the Chief Executive Officer of Western SizzlinCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2008 and the financial statements containedtherein, fully comply with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Qand the financial statements thereto fairly present, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of June 30,2008, and the period then ended.

 
| /s/  Sardar Biglari |   | Date:  November 14, 2008 |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|

#  

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**LAMARR SISTRUNK,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 157 MM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 24th day of November, 2015, the Application for Leave to** 

**Exceed Word Count is** DENIED. **Petitioner is** DIRECTED **to file a compliant Petition for**

**Allowance of Appeal within 30 days.**
HAWKS v. PATTON.

No. COA06-1275.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CVS308).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  
  
<ARTICLE> 5  
<LEGEND>  
This schedule contains summary financial information 
extracted from the Registrant's unaudited interim financial 
statements for the six months ended June 30, 1998 and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to those financial 
statements.  
</LEGEND>  
<CIK> 0000930364  
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST IV  
         
<S>                                       <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,096,878
<SECURITIES>                                13,939,195<F1>  
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,199,243<F2>  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0  
<INVENTORY>                                          0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,734,769
<PP&E>                                      15,974,250  
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,389,840)  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,714,229 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,252,164  
<BONDS>                                      4,530,049  
<COMMON>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,565,981  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,714,299  
<SALES>                                              0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,615,687  
<CGS>                                        2,410,903  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,410,903  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               931,128  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             255,406  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                420,940<F3> 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            420,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   420,940  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      883
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                     883
  
<FN>  
<F1>Investment in hydroelectric project and Biomass project
accounted for on equity method in financial statements.  
<F2>Includes $85,950 due from affiliates.
<F3>After deduction of minority interest in Providence 
Project earnings of $250,071.
</FN>  
          

</TABLE>
STATE v. BARLOWE

No. COA07-646.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Bertie (06CRS50458).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Guidant Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Keith E. Brauer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/    Keith
E. BrauerChief Financial Officer
# Council Decision 2014/74/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/74/CFSP of 10 February 2014 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against            Syria         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/74/CFSP                     

# of 10 February 2014

# amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria(1),                        

Whereas:

(1)On 31 May 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

(2)It is necessary to introduce in Decision 2013/255/CFSP an exemption from the asset freeze to allow the release of funds and                              economic resources of the Central Bank of Syria and of Syrian State-owned entities in order to make payments on behalf of                              the Syrian Arab Republic to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) for activities related to the                              OPCW verification mission and the destruction of Syrian chemical weapons, and in particular to the OPCW Syrian Special Trust                              Fund for activities related to the complete destruction of Syrian chemical weapons outside the territory of the Syrian Arab                              Republic.

(3)Further action by the Union is needed in order to implement certain measures.

(4)Decision 2013/255/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

In Article 28(3) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP, the following point is added:

intended for the Central Bank of Syria or Syrian State-owned entities, as listed in Annex I and II, to make payments on behalf                                 of the Syrian Arab Republic to the OPCW for activities related to the OPCW verification mission and the destruction of Syrian                                 chemical weapons, and in particular to the OPCW Syrian Special Trust Fund for activities related to the complete destruction                                 of Syrian chemical weapons outside the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic.’.                           

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

1

OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.
# Council Implementing Decision 2014/488/CFSPShow full title

Council Implementing Decision 2014/488/CFSP of 22 July 2014 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures            against Syria         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision 2014/488/CFSP                     

# of 22 July 2014

# implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof.

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria(1), and in particular Article 30(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 31 May 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

(2)In view of the gravity of the situation, three persons and nine entities should be added to the list of persons and entities                              subject to restrictive measures in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

(3)Decision 2013/255/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The persons and entities listed in the Annex to this Decision shall be added to the list set out in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union.*                   

## ANNEXU.K.List of persons and entities referred to in Article 1

### A.PersonsU.K.

Editorial Information

X1Substituted by Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2014/488/CFSP of 22 July 2014 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning                                 restrictive measures against Syria (Official Journal of the European Union L 217 of 23 July 2014).

### B.EntitiesU.K.

1

OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-43248, 333-56122, 333-104725, 333-115039, and 333-123587) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Active Power, Inc. of our reports dated February 24, 2006, with respectto the financial statements of Active Power, Inc., Active Power, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Active Power,Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ Ernst & YoungLLP 

Austin, Texas 

February 24, 2006
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1173/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1173/2014 of 24 October 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Salama da sugo (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1173/2014                     

# of 24 October 2014

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Salama da sugo                        (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Salama da sugo’ was                              published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name                              should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name ‘Salama da sugo’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)                     set out in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014(3).                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 178, 12.6.2014, p. 38.                           

3

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU)                              No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2015297EN.01000902.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 13.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 297/9 |

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2013/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on recreational craft and personal watercraft and repealing Directive 94/25/EC

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 354 of 28 December 2013](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2013_354_R_TOC)
)

On page 94, recital 41, first sentence:

for:

‘... in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ... to amend points 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 as well as Section 3 of Part B and Section 3 of Part C of Annex I, and Annexes V, VII and IX.’,

read:

‘... in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ... to amend points 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 of Section 2 as well as Section 3 of Part B and Section 3 of Part C of Annex I, and Annexes V, VII and IX.’;

on page 111, Article 47, point (a)(i):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(i) | points 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 as well as Section 3 of Part B and Section 3 of Part C of Annex I;’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(i) | points 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 of Section 2 as well as Section 3 of Part B and Section 3 of Part C of Annex I;’; |

on page 119, Annex I, Part B, Section 1, point 1.1, point (b):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | engine type, engine family, if applicable;’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | engine type and, if applicable, engine family;’. |

---
FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., d/b/a Forsyth Medical Center and Community General Health Partners, Inc., d/b/a Thomasville Medical Center, Plaintiffs, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Division of Facility Services, Certificate of Need Section, and Carmen Hooker Odom, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendants and North Carolina Baptist Hospital, High Point Regional Health System, and Lexington Memorial Hospital, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors.

No. 3P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Raleigh, Denise M. Gunter, Winston-Salem, for Forsyth Mem. Hosp. et al.

June S. Ferrell, Assistant Attorney General, for NCDHHS & Odom.

Robert V. Bode, Diana E. Rickerts, S. Todd Hemphill, Raleigh, for NC Baptist Hosp.

Gary S. Qualls, Colleen M. Crowley, Gina L. Bertoli, Research Triangle Park, for High Point Health System.

Terrill Johnson Harris, Greensboro, Robert L. Wilson, Jr., William W. Stewart, Jr., Raleigh, for Lexington Memorial Hosp.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 2nd day of January 2007 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."