alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3704 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3704

To authorize additional Federal Bureau of Investigation field agents to 
                     investigate financial crimes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2008

  Ms. Snowe (for herself and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize additional Federal Bureau of Investigation field agents to 
                     investigate financial crimes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FBI Priorities Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Federal Bureau of Investigation is the premier 
        Federal crime-fighting agency in the United States.
            (2) Since September 11, 2001, the Federal Bureau of 
        Investigation understandably has redirected resources to 
        counterterrorism and counterintelligence activities.
            (3) Criminal activity, including fraud, misrepresentation, 
        self-dealing, and insider trading, may have played a role in 
        the financial industry upheaval of 2008.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL AGENTS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated $150,000,000 for each of 
the fiscal years 2009 through 2013 to fund 1,000 Federal Bureau of 
Investigation field agents to investigate financial crimes. These 
agents shall be in addition to the number of field agents serving on 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Nathaniel LEGGETT.

No. 323P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Nathaniel Leggett, Pro Se.

John G. Barnwell, Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney Generals, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th day of March 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 683/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 683/2013 of 17 July 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 683/2013                     

# of 17 July 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 July 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# Electricity (Priority Dispatch) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 3

Electricity

# Electricity (Priority Dispatch) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

11th January 2013

Coming into operation

1st February 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.4.2021) by The Electricity (Priority Dispatch) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2020 (S.R. 2020/306), **reg. 5(b)**
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Kroll
Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Steven L. Ford,
Chief Financial Officer of Kroll Inc., certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                             
|
| | 2. The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of Kroll Inc.



| |     |                   
| | --- | ------------------
| | By: | /s/ STEVEN L. FORD

| |                                                             
| | ------------------------------------------------------------
| | ______________________________________ 
     Steven L. Ford,
| | Chief Financial Officer                                     

Date: March 28, 2003
O'MARA v. HEALTH SERVICES, et al.

No. 414PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Sally A, Lawing, Greensboro, for O'Mara.

Tamura D. Coffey, Linda L. Helms, Amanda B. Palmieri, Winston-Salem, for Wake Forest Health Sciences.

Burton Craige, Raleigh, for NCATL.

*889The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of December 2007 by Plaintiffs to Supplement Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of January 2008."
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Elaine R. Carbary, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MSB Financial, Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and we have:

> a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
> registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
> 
> b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
> as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and
> 
> c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
> or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
> ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
> 
> b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 30, 2003

\s\Elaine R. Carbary

Elaine R. Carbary, Chief Financial Officer
JOKER CLUB, LLC v. James E. HARDIN, Jr., District Attorney, 14th Judicial District

No. 304P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Robert F. Orr, Asheville, Edwin M. Speas, John Ward O'Hale, Raleigh, Allen W. Powell, for Joker Club, LLC.

David Adinolfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, for James E. Hardin, Jr.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 643 S.E.2d 626.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of July 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."

EDMUNDS, J., recused.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III                                 
|Leo F. Wells, III Chief Executive
Officer August 11, 2004



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                                 
|Douglas P. Williams Chief Financial
Officer August 11, 2004
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 12/17/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. TONYA LEE WELLMAKER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-6137 (D.C. No. CR-95-166-L) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. **
Defendant-appellant Tonya Lee Wellmaker pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and was sentenced to 92 months imprisonment and three years supervised release. In determining the sentence, the district court enhanced her base offense level by two levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4) because the firearm was stolen. In the district court, Ms. Wellmaker unsuccessfully- 2 -

argued that the firearm was not stolen because it was concealed in a black bag (that she intentionally removed from the vehicle of a former boyfriend so as to deprive him of it). Our jurisdiction to reconsider this point on appeal arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). We review the district court’s factual finding of a stolen firearm for clear error; any disputed legal issues are reviewed de novo. United States v. Rowlett , 23 F.3d 300, 303 (10th Cir. 1994). The record contains ample evidence that Ms. Wellmaker intended to steal the bag and its contents, including the firearm. The “firearm was stolen--” that she may have been unaware of the firearm’s presence in the bag initially or that she later sought to return it to its owner are legally insignificant facts. U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4) lacks a scienter requirement, it is in effect a strict liability sentencing enhancement. U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4), comment. n.19; United States v. Murphy , 96 F.3d 846, 848-49 (6th Cir. 1996); United States v. Sanders , 990 F.2d 582, 584 (10th Cir.), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 878 (1993). AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
Exhibit 31.01
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Bruce L. Cleland, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing operator ofThe Campbell Fund Trust. (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.      By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland           Bruce L. Cleland
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Shannon Bryan Quinn , Appellant

No. 06

- 22

- 00104

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

2229224 ). Memorandum O pinion delivered by Chief Justice Stevens

, Justice

van Cleef and Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that t h e appellant, Shannon Bryan Quinn , has adequately indicated h is inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 7 , 2023
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
S. 3605 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal history background checks. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal History Background 

Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a 

note) is amended by striking ‘‘a 66-month’’ and inserting ‘‘a 78- 

month’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1292/2014Show full title

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1292/2014 of 17 July 2014 on the conditions for classification, without testing, of            certain uncoated wood floorings under EN 14342 with regard to their reaction to fire (Text with EEA relevance)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1292/2014                     

# of 17 July 2014

# on the conditions for classification, without testing, of certain uncoated wood floorings under EN 14342 with regard to their                        reaction to fire                     

# (Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonized                           conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC(1), and in particular Article 27(5) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)A system for classifying the performance of construction products, with regard to their reaction to fire was adopted in Commission                              Decision 2000/147/EC(2). Wood floorings are among the construction products to which that Decision applies.

(2)Tests have shown wood floorings covered by the harmonised standard EN 14342 to have a stable and predictable performance concerning                              reaction to fire provided that they meet certain conditions regarding the density of the wood, the thickness of the flooring                              and the end use of the product.

(3)Wood floorings covered by the harmonised standard EN 14342 should therefore be deemed to satisfy the classes of performance                              for reaction to fire established in Decision 2000/147/EC on those conditions without further testing being required,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Wood floorings covered by the harmonised standard EN 14342 which fulfil the conditions set out in the Annex shall be deemed                     to satisfy the classes of performance indicated in the Annex without testing.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 July 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 5.                           

2

Commission Decision 2000/147/EC of 8 February 2000 implementing Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards the classification                              of the reaction to fire performance of construction products (OJ L 50, 23.2.2000, p. 14).
IN RE ESTATE OF DUNN.

No. COA07-191.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Durham (95E751).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.