alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Stoneridge, Inc. and Subsidiaries listed below of our reports dated March 16,
2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Stoneridge, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of Stoneridge, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2009:





Registration
            
            Description
      of Registration Statement333-149436
            
            Form S-8
      – Stoneridge, Inc. Amended And Restated Long-Term Incentive
      Plan333-127017
            
            Form S-8
      – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Restricted Shares Plan333-96953
            
            Form S-8
      – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Share Option Plan333-72176
            
            Form S-8
      – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Share Option
Plan


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Cleveland,
Ohio


March 16,
2010
STATE of North Carolina v. Garcel Lavar CHRISTIAN.

No. 598P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Jessica F. Blanch, for Christian.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 638 S.E.2d 470.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 7th day of November 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference; this the 24th day of January 2008."
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Equity OfficeProperties Trust, the general partner of EOP Operating Limited Partnership (the “Company”), eachhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to his / her knowledge, on the date hereof:(a) the Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2005, filed onthe date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:March 14, 2006 /s/ Richard D. Kincaid     Richard D. Kincaid
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power
Trust IV (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)             The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)             The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.








/s/
      Randall D. HolmesName:
            Randall
      D. HolmesTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
            November
      9, 2009








/s/
      Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
            Jeffrey
      H. StrasbergTitle:
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
            November
      9, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17703]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Hawaii Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference 
call of the Hawaii State Advisory Committee in the Western Region will 
convene at 2 p.m. (PDT) and adjourn at 3 p.m., Friday, September 30, 
2005. The purpose of the conference call is to discuss on-going 
projects and plan future activities.
    This conference call is available to the public through the 
following call-in number: 1-800-473-7796, access code number 44001094. 
Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to 
the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not 
initiated using the provided call-in number or over wireless lines and 
the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur 
no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line 
connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the 
proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-
8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and 
access code.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting 
Thomas Pilla of the Western Regional Office, (213) 894-3437, by 3 p.m. 
on Thursday, September 29, 2005.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, August 31, 2005.
Ivy L. Davis,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 05-17703 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999             APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999             APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,695                   9,695
<SECURITIES>                                    14,024                  14,024
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,849                   7,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                       447                     447
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,565                  31,565
<PP&E>                                           3,184                   3,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,295                   1,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,678                  40,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,751                   8,751
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,468                  29,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,678                  40,678
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,836                  27,017
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,383                  10,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,257                  26,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (232)                 (1,274)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    428                 (8,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50                     100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                378                 (8,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       378                 (8,108)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .03                  (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03                  (0.60)


</TABLE>
STATE v. JONES.

No. COA07-1308.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Robeson (02CRS54457, 02CRS54458).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# C_2023296EN.01002402.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/24

---

Appeal brought on 5 July 2023 by the European Data Protection Supervisor against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 26 April 2023 in Case T-557/20, Single Resolution Board v European Data Protection Supervisor

(Case C-413/23 P)

(2023/C 296/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) (represented by: D. Nardi, T. Zerdick, P. Candellier, X. Lareo, G. Devin, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The Appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside in its entirety the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside in its entirety the judgment under appeal;

| — | give a final judgment in the dispute; |
| --- | --- |

—

give a final judgment in the dispute;

| — | order the SRB to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the SRB to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of the proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the Appellant raises the following two grounds:

First ground: Incorrect interpretation of Article 3(1) and 3(6) of Regulation 2018/1725 (1) as interpreted by the case-law of the Court of Justice for having required the EDPS to assess whether the information at stake in the case was personal data taking the perspective of the recipient and by omitting to give consideration to the notion of pseudonymisation.

Second ground: Incorrect interpretation of Article 4(2) and 26(1) of Regulation 2018/1725 by omitting to give any consideration to the principle of accountability and having found that the EDPS should have proven that the SRB had effectively anonymised the personal data it was processing.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018, L 295, p. 39).

---
**EXHIBIT22.1**

 

Company Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries of American Skiing Company, a Delawarecorporation:

 

ASC Utah, a wholly-owned Maine corporation

ASC Leasing, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Blunder Bay Development, Inc., a wholly-owned Mainecorporation

Grand Summit Resort Hotel Sales, Inc., 80% owned Mainecorporation

Sunday River Skiway Corporation, a wholly-owned Mainecorporation

Sunday River, Ltd., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Perfect Turn, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation;

L.B.O. Holding, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

S-K-I, Ltd., a wholly-owned Delaware corporation

American Skiing Company Resort Properties, Inc., awholly-owned Maine corporation

Steamboat Ski and Resort Corporation, a wholly-ownedDelaware corporation

 

Subsidiaries of ASC Utah:

Community Water Company,a wholly owned Utah corporation

 

Subsidiaries of SteamboatSki & Resort Corporation:

Walton Pond Apartments,Inc., a 90% owned Delaware corporation

 

Subsidiaries of S-K-I,Ltd.:

Killington, Ltd., awholly-owned Vermont corporation

Sugarloaf MountainCorporation, a wholly-owned Maine corporation

SKI Insurance Company, awholly-owned Vermont corporation

Mount Snow, Ltd, awholly-owned Vermont corporation

Pico Ski Area ManagementCompany, a wholly-owned Vermont corporation

Killington West Ltd., awholly-owned California corporation

 

Subsidiaries ofKillington, Ltd.:

Killington Restaurants,Inc., a wholly-owned Vermont corporation

 

Subsidiaries of SugarloafMountain Corporation:

Mountainside, awholly-owned Maine corporation

Sugarloaf Land PartnersI, a 10% owned Maine partnership

Sugarloaf Land PartnersII, a 10% owned Maine partnership

 

Subsidiary of Mount Snow,Ltd.:

Dover Restaurants, Inc.,a wholly-owned Vermont corporation

 

Subsidiary of Pico SkiArea Management Company:

Uplands Water Company, a92.5% owned Vermont corporation

 

Subsidiaries of AmericanSkiing Company Resort Properties, Inc.:

Grand Summit ResortProperties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Steamboat ResortProperties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

The Canyons ResortProperties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Heavenly ResortProperties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

 

----

 

Sugarloaf ResortProperties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Killington ResortProperties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Mount Snow ResortProperties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Sunday River ResortProperties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Whisper Ridge, Inc. (fkaAttitash Resort Properties, Inc.), a wholly-owned Maine corporation

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.2.25

            SCHEDULE OF MATERIAL DIFFERENCES AMONG PERCENTAGE LEASES

            The following lists of material differences between the Percentage
Lease filed as Exhibit 10.2 and the Percentage Lease identified by the Exhibit
number below and is being filed pursuant to Instruction 2 to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
  Exhibit           Percentage Lease           Annual Base       Percentage Rent
  Number               Description                Rent               Formula
  ------               -----------                ----               -------
<S>          <C>                                <C>         <C>
  10.2.25    Lease Agreement dated as of        $867,100    25.9% of room revenue up
             January 17, 1997 by and between                to $3,347,876, plus 62% of
             Sunstone Hotel Investors, L.P., as             room revenue in excess of
             lessor and Sunstone Hotel                      $3,347,876 plus 5% of
             Properties, Inc., as lessee, for the           food and beverage
             Holiday Inn located in San Diego,              revenue, plus 100% of
             California.                                    sublease and concession
                                                            revenue and other net
                                                            revenues.
</TABLE>
Exhibit No. 11.  Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings for the three
                 months ended March 31, 1997 and 1996 (in thousands except per
                 share data).


                                                         Three Months Ended
                                                              March 31,
                                                    ----------------------------

                                                          1997          1996
                                                          ----          ----


    Net income                                          $  471         $  319
                                                        ======         ======


    Weighted average shares outstanding                  3,017          3,158

    Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
       effect of stock options                             106             26
                                                        ------         ------

    Total weighted average common shares
       and equivalents outstanding                       3,123          3,184
                                                        ======         ======

    Primary earnings per share                          $ 0.15         $ 0.10
                                                        ======         ======

    Total weighted average common shares
       and equivalents outstanding                       3,123          3,184

    Additional dilutive shares using the end
       of period market value versus the
       average market value when applying
       the treasury stock method (1)                       N/A            N/A
                                                        ------         ------
    Total weighted average common shares
       and equivalents outstanding for fully
       diluted computation                               3,123          3,184
                                                        ======         ======

    Fully diluted earnings per share                    $ 0.15         $ 0.10
                                                        ======         ======

------------------------------------
(1)  Fully  dilutive  earnings  per share did not  result in  dilution  of three
     percent or more, or are  anti-dilutive,  and are  therefore not  separately
     presented in the consolidated statements of operations.


                                       18
# C_2023321EN.01002401.xml

| 11.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 9 June 2023 — EA v Artemis security

(Case C-367/23, Artemis security)

(2023/C 321/29)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: EA

Defendant: Artemis security SAS

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time fulfil the conditions for it to have direct effect and be relied on by a worker in a dispute concerning that worker? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time fulfil the conditions for it to have direct effect and be relied on by a worker in a dispute concerning that worker?

| 2. | Must Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2003/88/EC be interpreted as precluding domestic legislation or practices under which, in the event of a failure to comply with the provisions adopted to implement the measures necessary for the free assessment of a worker’s health, the worker’s right to compensation is subject to proof of the damage which would have resulted from that breach? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2003/88/EC be interpreted as precluding domestic legislation or practices under which, in the event of a failure to comply with the provisions adopted to implement the measures necessary for the free assessment of a worker’s health, the worker’s right to compensation is subject to proof of the damage which would have resulted from that breach?

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Temetria Shatorie DAVIS.

No. 125P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Kristen L. Todd, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Davis.

Lisa C. Glover, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 656 S.E.2d 632.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 20th day of March 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1266/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1266/2014 of 25 November 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for cod in NAFO area 3M            by vessels flying the flag of a Member State of the European Union         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1266/2014                     

# of 25 November 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for cod in NAFO area 3M by vessels flying the flag of a Member State of the European                        Union                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).