alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



	
			
	Exhibit 10.1
	 
	Execution Version













AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
SUBORDINATED LOAN AGREEMENT


This AMENDMENT NO. 2 dated as of July 28, 2016 (this “Amendment”) to that certain SUBORDINATED LOAN AGREEMENT dated as of July 31, 2014, as amended by AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SUBORDINATED LOAN AGREEMENT, dated as of October 30, 2015 (as amended, the “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between Boardwalk Pipelines Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Lender”), and Boardwalk Pipelines, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Borrower”).


Capitalized terms used in this Amendment which are defined in the Agreement shall have the meanings given to them therein. 


WHEREAS, the Lender and the Borrower desire to amend the Agreement to extend the Availability Period from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2018. 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Borrower and the Lender agree as follows:


1.    The definition of “Availability Period” contained in Section 1.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
 “Availability Period” shall mean the period from the Closing Date through December 31, 2018.
2.      This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the law of the State of New York. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.  Signature pages may be detached from multiple separate counterparts and attached to a single counterpart so that all signature pages are attached to the same document.  Delivery of an executed signature page of this Agreement by facsimile transmission or electronic mail shall be as effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart hereof.  
3.     Except as expressly provide in this Amendment, the Agreement shall be unmodified and shall remain in full force and effect.


[signature page follows]


    









































Execution Version
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.
	
			
	 
	BOARDWALK PIPELINES, LP,
as Borrower

	 
	 
	By: Boardwalk Operating GP, LLC,
its general partner


By: Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, 
its managing member


By: Boardwalk GP, LP,
its general partner


By: Boardwalk GP, LLC, 
its general partner



	 
	By:
	__________________________________________

	 
	 
	Name:  Jamie L. Buskill

	 
	 
	Title:    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial and
             Administrative Officer and Treasurer

	 
	BOARDWALK PIPELINES HOLDING CORP., 
as Lender



	 
	By:
	____________________________________

	 
	 
	Name:  Jamie L. Buskill

	 
	 
	Title:    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial and
             Administrative Officer and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3685 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3685

      To prohibit the selling and counterfeiting of tickets for a 
                    Presidential inaugural ceremony.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           November 17 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit the selling and counterfeiting of tickets for a 
                    Presidential inaugural ceremony.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON SALE AND COUNTERFEITING OF INAUGURAL TICKETS.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for any person to--
            (1) except as provided in subsection (b), knowingly and 
        intentionally sell, facilitate the sale of, or transfer for 
        money or property, or attempt to sell, facilitate the sale of, 
        or transfer for money or property, a ticket to a Presidential 
        inaugural ceremony;
            (2) with the intent to defraud, falsely make, forge, 
        counterfeit, or falsely alter a ticket to a Presidential 
        inaugural ceremony; or
            (3) with the intent to defraud, use, unlawfully possess, or 
        exhibit a ticket to a Presidential inaugural ceremony, knowing 
        the ticket to be falsely made, forged, counterfeited, or 
        falsely altered.
    (b) Exception.--This section shall not apply to the sale, 
facilitation of the sale of, or transfer for money or property, or 
attempted sale, facilitation of the sale of, or transfer for money or 
property, of a ticket to a Presidential inaugural ceremony that occurs 
after the date on which the Presidential inaugural ceremony for which 
the ticket was issued occurs.
    (c) Penalty.--Whoever violates subsection (a) shall be fined under 
title 18, United States Code, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.
    (d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Presidential inaugural 
ceremony'' means a public inaugural ceremony at which the President 
elect or the Vice President elect take the oath or affirmation of 
office for the office of President of the United States or the office 
of Vice President of the United States, respectively.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 418 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 418

                   For the relief of Shigeru Yamada.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2007

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Shigeru Yamada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHIGERU YAMADA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Shigeru 
Yamada shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Shigeru Yamada enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Shigeru 
Yamada shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Shigeru Yamada, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Shigeru Yamada under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 
made available to natives of the country of birth of Shigeru Yamada 
under section 202(e) of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2023127EN.01005801.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/58

---

Action brought on 24 February 2023 — Darila v EUIPO — Original Buff (Buffet)

(Case T-101/23)

(2023/C 127/71)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Michal Darila (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: M. Holič, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Original Buff, SA (Igualada, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Buffet — Application for registration No 18 285 108

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 December 2022 in Case R 528/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision;

| — | uphold the decision of the Opposition Division on opposition No B 3 136 022; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the decision of the Opposition Division on opposition No B 3 136 022;

| — | reject the opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Mildred C. TUCK v. Jean TUROCI; Lynne Swanson, DVM; Allison Arnoult, DVM; Aadel Bussinger; Jo Annia Richesin; Tommy Murray; Beverly Funke; Margaret Pennybacker; and Laurie Knoll.

No. 77P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

A. Charles Ellis, New Bern, Nikiann Tarantino Gray, Raleigh, for Tuck.

P.C. Barwick, Kinston, for Turoci.

Lynne Swanson, Pro Se, for Swanson, DVM.

C. David Creech, New Bern, Jay C. Salsman, for Arnoult, DVM.

Ron D. Medlin, Jr., for Funke.

Thomas H. Morris, Kinston, for Pennybacker.

Timothy W. Wilson, Rocky Mount, for Knoll.

*396*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of February 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."

Upon consideration of the alternative petition filed by Plaintiff on the 20th day of February 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         364,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,939,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   851,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,752,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,780,000
<PP&E>                                       5,180,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,415,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,190,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,437,000
<BONDS>                                     10,884,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     67,000
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     800,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   869,000
<SALES>                                      7,620,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,620,000
<CGS>                                        5,228,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,228,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,734,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             155,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (497,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (499,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (499,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00103

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding 236th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 236

- 304886

- 18

Before Kerr, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Womack, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Op inion 

### I N RE 

### S OUTH 

### G ATE 

### C ONSTRUCTORS 

### , A 

### T EXAS 

### J OINT 

### V ENTURE 

### , K IEWIT 

### I NFRASTRUCTURE 

### S OUTH 

### C O 

### ., AND 

### A USTIN 

### B RID GE 

### & R OAD 

### , LP , Relator s2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator s’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the
opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator s’ petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : April 16, 2021
#### In the Matter of Chris J. Coschignano, Appellant, v Edmund M. Dane, Respondent, et al., Respondents.

[800 NYS2d 227]

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Edmund M. Dane as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2005, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Councilman of the Town of Oyster Bay, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated August 8, 2005, which dismissed the proceeding as untimely.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under either the 10-day or the 14-day limitation period set forth under Election Law § 16-102 (2), this proceeding was untimely *(see Matter of Stoppenbach v Goldstein,*287 AD2d 666 [2001]). We reject the petitioner’s contention that either there is no statute of limitations applicable to this proceeding or that the 14-day period should run from the date of the filing of the certificate of substitution *(see*Election Law § 16-102 [2]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding. Florio, J.P., Santucci, Krausman, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**Consent of Independent Auditors**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 Nos. 333-44562, 333-80931, 333-53083, 333-92080 and 333-107096)pertaining to (i) the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, (ii) the Employee StockPurchase Plan, and (iii) the 1997 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan,and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-60135) and relatedProspectus, of our report dated February 13, 2004, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of Gene Logic Inc. included in the AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1107/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1107/2014 of 16 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in Union and            international waters of Vb, VIb and VIaN by vessels flying the flag of France         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1107/2014                     

# of 16 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in Union and international waters of Vb, VIb and VIaN by vessels flying                        the flag of France                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 425 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 425

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the resources 
eligible for the renewable energy credit to kinetic hydropower, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2007

 Mr. Smith (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the resources 
eligible for the renewable energy credit to kinetic hydropower, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF RESOURCES ELIGIBLE FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDIT 
              TO KINETIC HYDROPOWER.

    (a) In General.--Section 45(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (defining qualified energy resources) is amended by striking 
``and'' at the end of subparagraph (G), by striking the period at the 
end of subparagraph (H) and inserting ``, and'', and by adding at the 
end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(I) kinetic hydropower.''.
    (b) Definition of Resources.--Section 45(c) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(10) Kinetic hydropower.--The term `kinetic hydropower' 
        means any of the following:
                    ``(A) Ocean free flowing water derived from flows 
                from tidal currents, ocean currents, waves, or estuary 
                currents.
                    ``(B) Ocean thermal energy.
                    ``(C) Free flowing water in rivers, lakes, man made 
                channels, or streams.''.
    (c) Facilities.--Section 45(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to qualified facilities) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(11) Kinetic hydropower facility.--In the case of a 
        facility using kinetic hydropower to produce electricity, the 
        term `qualified facility' means any facility owned by the 
        taxpayer which is originally placed in service after the date 
        of the enactment of this paragraph and before January 1, 2011. 
        Such term shall not include a facility which includes 
        impoundment structures.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```