alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3304 

To designate the North Palisade in the Sierra Nevada in the State of 

California as ‘‘Brower Palisade’’ in honor of the late David Brower. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2008 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the North Palisade in the Sierra Nevada in 

the State of California as ‘‘Brower Palisade’’ in honor 

of the late David Brower. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Brower Palisade Des5 ignation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3304 IS

1 (1) David Brower dedicated his life to environ2 mental advocacy and was 1 of the most notable envi3 ronmental stewards of the United States; 

4 (2) former Secretary of the Interior Stewart 

5 Udall referred to David Brower as the ‘‘giant of 

6 20th Century conservation in the United States’’; 

7 (3) David Brower was nominated for the Nobel 

8 Peace Prize 3 times; 

9 (4) David Brower was named the first executive 

10 director of the Sierra Club, 1 of the most prominent 

11 environmental and conservation organizations in the 

12 United States; 

13 (5) the efforts of David Brower led to the cre14 ation of many units of the National Park System, 

15 including North Cascades National Park, Redwood 

16 National Park, and Point Reyes National Seashore; 

17 (6) the leadership of David Brower helped pro18 tect the Grand Canyon National Park and Dinosaur 

19 National Monument; 

20 (7) David Brower played a important role in 

21 drafting the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et 

22 seq.), which has protected much of the Sierra Ne23 vada; 

24 (8) David Brower revolutionized rock-climbing 

25 and mountaineering in the United States and is 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 3304 IS

1 credited with more than 70 first ascents of Sierra 

2 Nevada peaks; 

3 (9) David Brower made the first winter ascent 

4 of North Palisade and the first ascent of the North5 west Ridge of the peak; and 

6 (10) the Palisade group of peaks, on the border 

7 of Kings Canyon National Park and Inyo National 

8 Forest, was David Brower’s favorite part of the Si9 erra Nevada. 

10 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF BROWER PALISADE. 

11 (a) DESIGNATION.—The North Palisade, a promi12 nent peak in the Palisade group of peaks in the Sierra 

13 Nevada bordering Kings Canyon National Park and the 

14 Inyo National Forest in the State of California, shall be 

15 known and designated as the ‘‘Brower Palisade’’. 

16 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg17 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

18 States to the peak described in subsection (a) shall be 

19 deemed to be a reference to the Brower Palisade. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Order entered January 8 , 202 1

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00881
- CV OHIO GRAVY BISCUIT, INC. AS TRUSTEE FOR THE WOODHAVEN

DRIVE 1401 LAND TRUST, Appellant

V. NRZ PASS
- THROUGH TRUST X, US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401
- 04848
- 2019

ORDER The clerk’s record in this appeal contained certain errors. O n January 6, 2021, a corrected clerk’s record was filed. To avoid confusion, we STRIKE the original clerk’s record filed November 5, 2020. The appeal shall proceed on the January 6 th corrected record.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned,
Leo F. Wells, III, Principal Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Principal Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General
Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Leo F. Wells, III      
|Leo F. Wells, III          
|Principal Executive Officer
|November 8, 2007           



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Douglas P. Williams    
|Douglas P. Williams        
|Principal Financial Officer
|November 8, 2007
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 63 – 1350, the Chief Financial Officer of Western SizzlinCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2004 and the financial statements contained therein, fullycomply with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q and thefinancial statements thereto fairly present, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 16,  2004 |               |
|------------------|--------------------|
|             |               |
|             | /s/ Robyn B.  Mabe |

 

1

----
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T CE LI A V I CT ORI NA BE NA VI DEZ, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74325 A ge nc yN o. A 094- 454- 970 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C e l i aV i c t or i naB e na vi de z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f or r e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rs um m ar i l ya f f i rm i ng an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s dec i si on fi nd i ng her r em ov abl e and denyi ng her 

# FI LED APR14 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74325 2 appl i c a t i ons f

orc a nc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l a nd vol unt aryde partur e . W e di s m i s s the p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew B enavi dez’ s c on t ent i on s r egar di ng her c o n v ic tio n b e c au s e s h e f a ile dto e x h au s t th e c o n te n tio n s b e f o r e th e B I A . See Fi gu er oa v. Mukasey , 543 F . 3d 487, 492 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( “ T he e xhaus t i on doc tr i ne r e qui r e s tha tthe pe t i t i one rputthe B I A on not i c e a s t o the s pe c i f i c i s s ue s s o tha tthe B I A ha s a n opportuni tyt o pa s s on thos e i s s ue s . ” ) ( i nt e rna l quot a t i ons a nd al t er at i on s om i tt ed). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.
IN RE R.A.T.

No. COA07-688.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Sampson (06JB85).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,664
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,855
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 17,281
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             0
<LOANS>                                     91,399
<ALLOWANCE>                                    228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             122,218
<DEPOSITS>                                  93,954
<SHORT-TERM>                                     0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,629
<LONG-TERM>                                 12,000
<COMMON>                                     1,220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             122,218
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,401
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              803
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               128
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,332
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,795
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,122
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,210
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   80
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,498
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,498
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   904
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                3.88
<LOANS-NON>                                    213
<LOANS-PAST>                                     0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               194
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   46
<RECOVERIES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              228
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           228
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0


</TABLE>
ANDERSON v. CROUCH.

No. COA07-1319.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from New Hanover (07CVS1275).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. Tommie Earl MYLES.

No. 41A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 29, 2008.

Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Myles.

Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 654 S.E.2d 752.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of January 2008 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of January 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                       533
<INVENTORY>                                     43,180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,293
<PP&E>                                          69,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 686,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,475
<BONDS>                                        408,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       216,353
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   686,735
<SALES>                                        364,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               364,092
<CGS>                                          295,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  295,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,833
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,833
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ImproveNet, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the year period ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") I, Jeffrey I. Rassas, Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or
     78o(d)): and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


ImproveNet, Inc.


/s/ Jeffrey I. Rassas
--------------------------
Jeffrey I. Rassas
Co-Chairman and CEO

Dated: April 14, 2004
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Hai Sheng Chen, the
Chief Executive Officer of CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC. (the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.      The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this statement this 28th day of
September, 2010.





/s/ Hai Sheng ChenHai
      Sheng ChenChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Precision Steel, Inc. and will be retained by China Precision Steel, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may obtain copies of agreements by contacting the Commission's Office of Agreements at 202-523-5793 or via e-mail at                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov*. Interested parties may submit comments on an                           ( print page 49922)                        agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

*Agreement No.:*                     010050-016.                 

*Title:*                     U.S. Flag Discussion Agreement.                 

*Parties:*                     American President Lines, Ltd.; A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S; Lykes Lines Limited, LLC; P&O Nedlloyd Limited; and Farrell Lines Incorporated.                 

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M Street, NW., Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.                 

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment adds APL Co. PTE Ltd. as a party to the agreement.                 

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission. 

August 19, 2005. 

Bryant VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-16856 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
STATE v. William B. COOK.

No. 233P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Charles E. Reece, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of May 2008 by Defendant for Appointment of Counsel:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of June 2008."
STARK v. RATASHARA-STARK.

No. COA07-665.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Stokes (02CVD733).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                             OMEGA CABINETS, LTD.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Predecessor                                      The Company
                              ------------------------------    -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                  Year ended
                               Year ended     Period from          Period from     ----------------------------------------
                              December 31,  January 1, 1994     June 17, 1994 to   December 30,  December 28,  December 27,
                                  1993      to June 16, 1994    December 31, 1994      1995          1996          1997
                              ------------------------------    -----------------------------------------------------------
<S>                           <C>           <C>                 <C>                <C>           <C>           <C>
Income before income taxes
 and extraordinary item        $10,287,992     $2,095,952          $3,057,877       $ 3,439,656  $11,856,024   $ 3,460,653
 
 
Fixed charges:
 
 Interest expense                   60,349         22,321           4,123,344         9,700,914   10,441,182    16,311,997
 
 Estimated portion of
  rental expense
  attributable to interest   
  costs (25%)                      235,322        135,750             161,500           333,750      421,500       402,750
                              ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Total fixed charges                295,671        158,071           4,284,844        10,034,664   10,862,682    16,714,747
                              ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Earnings before income
 taxes and fixed charges       $10,583,663     $2,254,023          $7,342,721       $13,474,320  $22,718,706   $20,175,400
                              =============================================================================================
 
Ratio of earnings to fixed
 charges                              35.8           14.3                 1.7               1.3          2.1           1.2
 
</TABLE>
STATE v. Lori Shannon ICARD.

No. 236A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 23, 2008.

Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of July 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Prepare Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Icard) shall have up to and including the 23rd day of August 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of July 2008."