alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February 24,2015

No. 04-14-00890-CV

CHRISTOPHER JAMES COLEMAN,

Appellant

v.

DOVER MAINTENANCE ASS'N, INC.,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-01340

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER OF REFERRAL

The Court, after reviewing the responses of the parties, has determined that the dispute

pending in this Court is appropriate for referral to an Alternative Dispute Resolution procedure.

Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. 154.021 (a) (Vernon 2005). It is therefore, ORDERED that

this cause be referred to Mediated Settlement Conference which will be conducted by Pat Boonc,

an impartial person, as Mediator. See id. 154.051.052.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that all appellate deadlines are hereby suspended until April 8,

2015.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that mediation shall commence at such place as the Mediator

may designate and proceed in accordance with the schedule set by the Mediator until completed, but

in any event the mediation shall be completed no later than forty-five (45) days from the date of this

Order. The Mediator shall file with the Clerk of Court within three (3) days of the completion of the

mediation written report concerning the disposition of this appeal.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Mediator shall be compensated and that parties in

this cause shall be equally responsible for its share of this obligation. Mediation fees shall

ultimately be taxed as court costs. See id. 154.054.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that all parties to this cause are directed to attend the

Mediated Settlement Conference with their counsel of record. The corporate party representative

in attendance and the individual party representatives shall have full authority to settle up to and

including the judgment amount. To facilitate this procedure the Mediator shall encourage and

assist, but will not compel or coerce the parties in reaching settlement of the dispute. Unless the
parties otherwise agree, all matters, including the conduct and demeanor of the parties and their

counsel during mediation, shall remain confidential and shall never be disclosed to anyone,

including this Court. See id 154.053.

Provided the parties are able to settle all matters related to this appeal, the parties are

directed to file joint motion requesting an appropriate disposition of this appeal within thirty

(30) days of the date of mediation.

It is so ORDERED on February 24, 2015

Maria^n BamardyJustice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. have hereunto set my hand and affixed the

court on this 24"' day of February, 2015.

of the said
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000930548
<NAME> RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,650
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,482
<PP&E>                                       1,767,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                (172,649) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,909,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,739
<BONDS>                                        958,608
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         92
<COMMON>                                           401
<OTHER-SE>                                     703,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,909,077
<SALES>                                         70,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,108
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,774
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,324
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
Wilson MYERS, Administrator of The Estate of Timothy James Tickle, and Cynthia Myers v. Billy BRYANT, Sheriff of Lee County, North Carolina, and Lee County, North Carolina; and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland.

No. 107P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

James R. Morgan, Jr., Bradley Wood, Winston-Salem, for Billy Bryant.

Stanley W. West, Southern Pines, for Myers and Estate.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 655 S.E.2d 882.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of March 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 2, 2018

No. 04-17-00704-CV

Russell AMSBERRY,

Appellant

v.

Alejandra SALAZAR,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-17196

The Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due 

February 16, 2018.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of February, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D.        
|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|                   |  |  |  | Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D.            
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 326/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 326/2013 of 27 March 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EU and international            waters of I and II by vessels flying the flag of United Kingdom         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 326/2013                     

# of 27 March 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EU and international waters of I and II by vessels flying the flag of                        United Kingdom                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 March 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
STATE v. COLEMAN.

No. COA07-825.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CRS230024).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
RICHARDSON v. BANK OF AMERICA.

No. 240PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

John H. Culver, III, F.Amy Pritchard Williams, Charlotte, Walter E. Dellinger, III, Washington, DC, McGlinchey Stafford, Anthony J. Rollo, Baton Rouge, LA, Daniel T. Plunkett, New Orleans, LA, for Bank of America, NationsCredit Financial.

G. Christopher Olson, Raleigh, for Richardson, et al.

Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Jack L. Cozort, Raleigh, Eileen R. Youens, for N.C. Chamber.

Reed Johnston, Jr., for Consumer Credit Industry Associa.

Charlene McNulty, for NC Justice Center.

J. Jerome Hartzell, Raleigh, for NCATL.

Stephanie M. Ceccato, for Legal Services of S. Piedmont.

William J. Whalen, for Pisgah Legal Services.

Mallam J. Maynard, for Financial Law Center.

Christopher Browning, Jr., Solicitor General, Philip A. Lehman, M. Lynne Weaver, Assistant Attorney Generals, L. McNeil Chestnut, Special Deputy Attorney General and Counsel to the Commissioner of Banks, Gary E. Govert, Special Deputy Attorney General for the State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of December 2007 by Plaintiffs to Amend and Supplement Record:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of March 2008."

EDMUNDS, J., recused.
STATE of North Carolina v. James Edward GRAY.

No. 42P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

James Edward Gray, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 28th day of January 2008 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Lee County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                FOR THE THREE             FOR THE NINE
                                                MONTHS ENDED              MONTHS ENDED
                                                SEPTEMBER 30,             SEPTEMBER 30,
                                           ----------------------    ----------------------
                                              1996         1997         1996         1997
                                           ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
<S>                                        <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>      
Per Share Data:

       Net income                          $   3,934    $   3,189    $  11,142    $   4,512
                                           =========    =========    =========    =========
       Net income per common and common
       equivalent shares, primary          $    0.41    $    0.35    $    1.17    $    0.51
                                           =========    =========    =========    =========
       Net income per common and common
       equivalent shares, fully diluted    $    0.41    $    0.35    $    1.17    $    0.51
                                           =========    =========    =========    =========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON AND COMMON
EQUIVALENT SHARES:

Primary:
       Weighted average number of
       common shares outstanding               8,991        8,409        8,943        8,373

       Common equivalent shares:
            Options                              613          694          567          438
                                           ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                               9,604        9,103        9,510        8,811
                                           =========    =========    =========    =========
Fully diluted:
       Weighted average number of
       common shares outstanding               8,991        8,409        8,943        8,373

       Common equivalent shares:
            Options                              637          723          593          457
                                           ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                               9,628        9,132        9,536        8,830
                                           =========    =========    =========    =========
</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 400/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 400/2014 of 22 April 2014 concerning a coordinated multiannual control programme            of the Union for 2015, 2016 and 2017 to ensure compliance with maximum residue levels of pesticides and to assess the consumer            exposure to pesticide residues in and on food of plant and animal origin (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 400/2014                     

# of 22 April 2014

# concerning a coordinated multiannual control programme of the Union for 2015, 2016 and 2017 to ensure compliance with maximum                        residue levels of pesticides and to assess the consumer exposure to pesticide residues in and on food of plant and animal                        origin                     

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/595 of 15 April 2015 concerning a coordinated multiannual control programme of                                 the Union for 2016, 2017 and 2018 to ensure compliance with maximum residue levels of pesticides and to assess the consumer                                 exposure to pesticide residues in and on food of plant and animal origin Text with EEA relevance.
# C_2023071EN.01003901.xml

| 27.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/39

---

Action brought on 17 January 2023 — Light Tec v EUIPO — DecoTrend (lampshades)

(Case T-10/23)

(2023/C 71/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Light Tec Ltd (Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong, China) (represented by: M.-H. Hoffmann)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DecoTrend GmbH (Weiden, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: EU design lampshades / EU design No 4031201-0004

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2022 in Case R 2105/2021-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and EU design No 4031201-0004; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and EU design No 4031201-0004;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party in the proceedings to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party in the proceedings to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 63(1) of Council Directive (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 63(1) of Council Directive (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 63(2) of Council Directive (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 63(2) of Council Directive (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of the obligation to state reasons; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the obligation to state reasons;

| — | Infringement of Article 60(2) of Council Directive (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(2) of Council Directive (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of the right to be heard. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the right to be heard.

---
STATE v. SHOLAR.

No. COA08-89.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 19, 2008.

Certification Date September 8, 2008.

Appeal from Duplin (06CRS50860, 06CRS51175).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Council Decision 2014/455/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/455/CFSP of 11 July 2014 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect            of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/455/CFSP                     

# of 11 July 2014

# amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial                        integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining                           or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine(1), and in particular Article 3(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 17 March 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/145/CFSP.

(2)In view of the gravity of the situation in Ukraine, the Council considers that additional persons should be added to the list                              of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures as set out in the Annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP.

(3)The Annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The persons listed in the Annex to this Decision shall be added to the list set out in the Annex to Decision 2014/145/CFSP.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

## ANNEXU.K.LIST OF PERSONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1

1

OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 865/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 865/2014 of 8 August 2014 correcting the Spanish version of Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic            materials and articles intended to come into contact with food (Text with EEA relevance)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 865/2014                     

# of 8 August 2014

# correcting the Spanish version of Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact                        with food                     

# (Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials                           and articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC(1), and in particular Article 5(1)(a), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), (i) and (j) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)There is an error in the Spanish version of Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 of 14 January 2011 on plastic materials                              and articles intended to come into contact with food(2). Therefore a correction of the Spanish version is necessary. The other language versions are not affected.

(2)Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

(3)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain                              and Animal Health and neither the European Parliament nor the Council have opposed them,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

*(Concerns only the Spanish version.)*                   

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

It shall apply from 1 May 2011.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.

Done at Brussels, 8 August 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 338, 13.11.2004, p. 4.                           

2

OJ L 12, 15.1.2011, p. 1.