alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.7
EXECUTION VERSION


SUPPLEMENT TO COLLATERAL TRUST AGREEMENT
Reference is made to the Collateral Trust Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2012 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Collateral Trust Agreement”), among AK Steel Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “Grantor”), U.S. Bank National Association, as Senior Indenture Trustee, U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent, and each other Person party thereto from time to time.  Terms defined in the Collateral Trust Agreement and not otherwise defined herein are as defined in the Collateral Trust Agreement.
This Supplement to Collateral Trust Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2016 (this “Supplement to Collateral Trust Agreement”), is being delivered pursuant to Section 5(g) of the Collateral Trust Agreement.
The undersigned, MOUNTAIN STATE CARBON, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Additional Grantor”), hereby agrees to become a party to the Collateral Trust Agreement as a Grantor thereunder, for all purposes thereof on the terms set forth therein, and to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of the Collateral Trust Agreement as fully as if the Additional Grantor had executed and delivered the Collateral Trust Agreement as of the date thereof.  
This Supplement to Collateral Trust Agreement may be executed in counterparts (and by different parties hereto on different counterparts), each of which shall constitute an original but all of which when taken together shall constitute a single contract.  Delivery of an executed signature page to this Supplement to Collateral Trust Agreement by facsimile or PDF transmission shall be as effective as delivery of a manually signed counterpart of this Supplement to Collateral Trust Agreement.  Signatures of the parties hereto transmitted by facsimile or PDF shall be deemed to be their original signatures for all purposes.
This Supplement to Collateral Trust Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York without regard to principles of conflicts of laws.
[Signature Pages Follow]















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Additional Grantor has caused this Supplement to Collateral Trust Agreement to be duly executed by its authorized representative as of the day and year first above written.
	
		
	MOUNTAIN STATE CARBON, LLC

	By:
	/s/ Lawrence Hermes

	Name:
	Lawrence Hermes

	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer, Vice President,

	 
	Controller and Secretary
















































[Supplement to Collateral Trust Agreement]

















The Collateral Agent acknowledges receipt of this Supplement to Collateral Trust Agreement and agrees to act as Collateral Agent with respect to the Collateral pledged by the Additional Grantor as of the day and year first above written.


	
		
	U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

	as Collateral Agent

	By:
	/s/ William E. Sicking

	Name:
	William E. Sicking

	Title:
	Vice President & Trust Officer












































































[Supplement to Collateral Trust Agreement]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Patrick G. Blanchard,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James M. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer,
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:/s/ Patrick G. BlanchardPatrick G. BlanchardPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 29, 2005/s/ James M. ThomasJames M. ThomasChief Financial OfficerMarch 29, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       573
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             18,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          21,101
<PP&E>                                   368,763
<DEPRECIATION>                           205,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           186,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     39,136
<BONDS>                                  175,735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                2,618
<COMMON>                                     983
<OTHER-SE>                               (32,430)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             186,042
<SALES>                                   18,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          19,110
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           8,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         5,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .02
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- The Boeing Company Under Contract No. N00019-04-C-0014 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59589

Karen L. Manos, Esq. Dhananjay S. Manthripragada, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Lawrence S. Rabyne, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Arlington Heights, IL ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 13 April 2015

# ~~ Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59589, Appeal ofThe Boeing Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3692 

To rescind Treasury Notice 2008–83. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2008 

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To rescind Treasury Notice 2008–83. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESCISSION OF TREASURY NOTICE 2008–83. 

4 Treasury Notice 2008–83 (suspending the rule in 

5 section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that 

6 disallows use of a net unrealized built-in loss for financial 

7 institutions) is considered null and void and of no effect. 

8 The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied and 

9 administered as if Treasury Notice 2008–83 had never 

10 been issued. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 32

                                 Certifications
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


      In connection  with the Annual  Report of NovaDel  Pharma Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2004, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  Gary A.
Shangold, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Howard
Kance, Interim Principal Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each
hereby certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 15, 2004                  /s/ Gary A. Shangold
       -----------------                  --------------------------------------
                                          Gary A. Shangold, M.D.
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 15, 2004                  /s/ Howard Kance
       -----------------                  --------------------------------------
                                          Howard Kance
                                          Interim Chief Financial Officer


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
STATE v. Carl Douglas ST. JOHN.

No. 638P02-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of December 2007 by Defendant on Writ of Certiorari to the N.C. Supreme Court:

*891"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of January 2008."

HUDSON, J., recused.
# L_2017020EN.01000101.xml

| 25.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 20/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 20/1

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 176 of 27 June 2013
  )

On page 358, Article 22(4):

for:

‘... not subject to supervision under this Directive or under Directives 2009/65/EC, 2009/138EC, or 2004/39/EC.’,

read:

‘... not subject to supervision under this Directive or under Directive 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, or 2004/39/EC.’;

on page 375, Article 67(1), point (n):

for:

‘... or in cases where Articles 28, 51 or 63 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 prohibit such payments to holders of instruments included in own funds;’,

read:

‘... or in cases where Article 28, 52 or 63 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 prohibit such payments to holders of instruments included in own funds;’;

on page 400, Article 117(4), first subparagraph, introductory wording:

for:

‘... where such a decision are of importance for other competent authorities' supervisory tasks:’,

read:

‘... where such a decision is of importance for other competent authorities' supervisory tasks:’;

on page 408, Article 133(3):

for:

‘3.   For the purpose of paragraph 1, institutions may be required to maintain, in addition to the Common Equity Tier 1 capital maintained to meet the own funds requirement imposed by Article 92 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, ....’,

read:

‘3.   For the purpose of paragraph 1 of this Article, institutions may be required to maintain, in addition to the Common Equity Tier 1 capital maintained to meet the own funds requirements imposed by Article 92 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, ....’;

on page 416, Article 142(1), second subparagraph:

for:

‘Competent authorities shall grant such authorisations only on the basis of the individual situation of a credit institution ....’,

read:

‘Competent authorities shall grant such authorisations only on the basis of the individual situation of an institution ....’;

on page 421, Article 158(5), first sentence:

for:

‘5.   ... the competent authorities ... shall establish and chair a college of supervisors to facilitate ... the exchange of information under Article 60.’,

read:

‘5.   ... the competent authorities ... shall establish and chair a college of supervisors to facilitate ... the exchange of information under Article 50.’.

---
STATE v. VALDOVINOS.

No. COA06-1485.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Alamance (04CRS56876, 04CRS56877).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          ALL-AMERICAN SPORTPARK, INC.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB of All-American SportPark, Inc. for the quarter ending March
31, 2007:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of All-
American SportPark, Inc.


Dated:  May 21, 2007




/s/ Ronald Boreta
Ronald Boreta
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and
Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to All-American SportPark, Inc.
and will be retained by All-American SportPark, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-41714, No. 333-69334, No. 333-71866 and No. 333-139999 on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-70102, No. 333-108319, No. 333-111442, No. 333-135829,No. 333-114661 and No. 333-118970 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 30, 2007, relating to the financial statements of Transgenomic, Inc., and subsidiaries (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and included an explanatoryparagraph relating to the Company’s adoption in 2006 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transgenomic, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Omaha, Nebraska 

March 30, 2007
TAYLOR v. TAYLOR GRAPHICS/CREATIVE GRAPHICS.

No. COA07-1220.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 3, 2008.

Certification Date June 23, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 379748, I.C. NO. 379751, I.C. NO. 952127).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO 
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    (1)
    the Annual Report on
    Form 10-K
    of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
    (the Report) which this certification accompanies
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
    78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  JOHN
    C. COREY
STATE v. BECK.

No. COA07-605.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (00CRS52819).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000             APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000             APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,524                   3,524
<SECURITIES>                                    21,163                  21,163
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,841                   7,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                       684                     684
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,866                  27,866
<PP&E>                                           3,723                   3,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,853                   1,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,534                  44,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,559                  10,559
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,213                  31,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,534                  44,534
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,853                  32,289
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,775                  10,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,939                  20,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (215)                 (1,137)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (646)                   2,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (646)                   2,388
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (646)                   2,388
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)                     .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)                     .17


</TABLE>
STATE v. THONG XUAN MAI.

No. COA07-691.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CRS220759, 05CRS220760).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE  QUARTERLY  PERIOD  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929299
<NAME>                        ISOLYSER COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               9,477<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       27,437<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         44,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    86,719
<PP&E>                                              93,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                      18,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     218,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               57,598
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                40
<OTHER-SE>                                         155,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       218,759
<SALES>                                            124,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                              110,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      110,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    36,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (24,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (24,652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (24,652)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.63)
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES CASH EQUIVALENTS.
<F2> ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE SHOWN NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Dougras — Saitta

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted.

Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Petitioner acknowledges in the petition that no written order reflecting the district court's ruling has been entered. This court has held that the district court's oral pronouncement from the bench is ineffective for any purpose. Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987). Moreover, the district court noted at the July 2, 2013, hearing that the State of Illinois is the jurisdiction to resolve the issue of custody as to these children. Under these circumstances, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. See NRAP 21(b); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851 (stating that the issuance of an extraordinary writ is purely discretionary with this court). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.'

J.

cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division Special Public Defender Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Eighth District Court Clerk
"In light of our decision in this matter, we deny petitioner's request for a stay as moot.

2