50390 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices 

recipients, providers, and funders when 

no or few fully evidence-based 

interventions are available; and helps 

promote continued innovation in the 

development of evidence-based 

interventions. Others have argued that 

several distinct categories will confuse 

NREPP users. Please comment on 

SAMHSA’s proposal in this area. 

5. SAMHSA recognizes the 

importance of considering the extent to 

which interventions have been tested 

with diverse populations and in diverse 

settings. Therefore, the agency 

anticipates incorporating this 

information into the web site 

descriptions of interventions listed on 

NREPP. This may allow NREPP users to 

learn if interventions are applicable to 

their specific needs and situations, and 

may also help to identify areas where 

additional studies are needed to address 

the effectiveness of interventions with 

diverse populations and in diverse 

locations.

SAMHSA is aware that more evidence 

is needed on these topics. Please 

comment on SAMHSA’s approach in 

this area. 

6. To promote consistent, reliable, and 

transparent standards to the public, 

SAMHSA proposes that all existing 

programs on NREPP meet the prevailing 

scientific criteria described in this 

proposal, and that this be accomplished 

through required re-reviews of all 

programs currently on NREPP. 

SAMHSA has considered an alternative 

approach that would ‘‘grandfather’’ all 

existing NREPP programs under the new 

system, but would provide clear 

communication that these existing 

programs have not been assessed against 

the new NREPP scientific standards. 

Please comment on which approach you 

believe to be in the best interests of 

SAMHSA stakeholders. 

7. What types of guidance, resources, 

and/or specific technical assistance 

activities are needed to promote greater 

adoption of NREPP interventions, and 

what direct and indirect methods 

should SAMHSA consider in advancing 

this goal? 

8. SAMHSA is committed to 

consumer, family, and other 

nonscientist involvement in the NREPP 

process. The panels convened by 

SAMHSA and described earlier in this 

notice suggested that these stakeholders 

be included specifically to address 

issues of intervention utility and 

practicality. Please comment on how 

consumer, family, and other 

nonscientist stakeholders could be 

involved in NREPP. 

9. SAMHSA has identified NREPP as 

one source of evidence-based 

interventions for selection by potential 

agency grantees in meeting the 

requirements related to some of 

SAMHSA’s discretionary grants. What 

guidance, if any, should SAMHSA 

provide related to NREPP as a source of 

evidence-based interventions for use 

under the agency’s substance abuse and 

mental health block grants? 

10. SAMHSA believes that NREPP 

should serve as an important, but not 

exclusive source, of evidence-based 

interventions to prevent and/or treat 

mental and substance use disorders. 

What steps should SAMHSA take to 

promote consideration of other sources 

(e.g., clinical expertise, consumer or 

recipient values) in stakeholders’

decisions regarding the selection, 

delivery and financing of mental health 

and substance abuse prevention and 

treatment services? 

11. SAMHSA anticipates that once 

NREPP is in operation, various 

stakeholders will make suggestions for 

improving the system. To consider this 

input in a respectful, deliberate, and 

orderly manner, SAMHSA anticipates 

annually reviewing these suggestions. 

These reviews would be conducted by 

a group of scientist and nonscientist 

stakeholders knowledgeable about 

evidence in behavioral health and the 

social sciences. Please comment on 

SAMHSA’s proposal in this area. 

References

Mason, CA, Scott, KG, Chapman, DA, Tu, 

S. A review of some individual and 

community level effect size indices for the 

study of risk factors for child and adolescent 

development. Ed. Psychol. Measurement. 

2000; 60(3): 385–410. 

Rosenthal, JA. Qualitative descriptors of 

strength of association and effect size. J. of 

Soc. Serv. Research. 1996; 21(4): 37–59. 

Rutledge, T, Loh, C. Effect size and 

statistical testing in the determination of 

clinical significance in behavioral medicine 

research. Annals of Beh. Med. 2004; 27(2): 

138–145. 

Schmidt, F, Hunter, JE. The impact of dataanalysis methods on cumulative research 

knowledge: statistical significance testing, 

confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Eval. 

Health Prof. 1995 Dec; 18(4): 408–27.

[FR Doc. 05–17034 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Customs and Border Protection 

Entries of Antidumping and/or 

Countervailing Duties Destroyed 

September 11, 2001

AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection; 

Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: General notice.

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) suspends the 

liquidation of entries of merchandise 

subject to antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties (AD/CVD) until 

liquidation instructions are received 

from the Department of Commerce. Due 

to the extended liquidation cycle of AD/

CVD entries, CBP is only now beginning 

to receive liquidation instructions from 

the Department of Commerce for many 

AD/CVD entries from previous years. 

Unfortunately, AD/CVD entry 

documents which were maintained by 

CBP at 6 World Trade Center in New 

York, New York, were destroyed in the 

terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. 

This notice announces that CBP is 

providing importers with the option to 

provide a reconstructed entry summary 

package to CBP for liquidation of these 

entries. Failure by the importer to 

provide a reconstructed entry summary 

package within the time frame described 

in this notice may result in liquidation 

by CBP of the entry, or entries, based 

upon the information available within 

the Automated Commercial System 

(ACS).

DATES: If a reconstructed entry summary 

package is not received by the Bureau of 

Customs and Border Protection within 

30 days following publication by the 

Department of Commerce that 

suspension of the liquidation of the 

subject entry, or entries, has been lifted, 

and the Department of Commerce has 

issued final assessment instructions, 

CBP will begin liquidating the entries 

based on the information available in 

ACS.

ADDRESSES: The reconstructed entry 

package should be mailed to: Customs 

and Border Protection, ATTN: ADCVD 

6WTC Reconstructed Entry(s), 1100 

Raymond Boulevard, Newark, NJ 07102.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christine Furgason, Office of Field 

Operations, (202) 344–2293. For 

inquiries about specific entry summary 

packages: Walter Springer, Supervisory 

Import Specialist, Newark, N.J., (973) 

368–6785. Importers, or their 

representatives, may also directly 

contact the Import Specialist Teams to 

whom the entries were assigned. A 

party making a telephonic inquiry 

regarding a specific entry summary 

package should be prepared to provide 

its importer name and identification 

number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty (AD/CVD) laws are intended to 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices 50391

counter unfair trade practices that result 

in injury to U.S. industry. 

AD/CV investigations are typically 

initiated by a domestic industry or 

industry association, through the filing 

of a petition with the Department of 

Commerce (DOC), alleging unfair 

competition by foreign manufacturers or 

foreign countries. The DOC then 

investigates the allegations. If DOC 

makes a preliminary determination that 

dumping or subsidies exist, the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

must then make a determination as to 

whether an industry in the United 

States is materially injured or 

threatened with material injury, or 

whether the establishment of an 

industry (in the United States), is 

materially retarded by reason of the 

unfair competition. If final positive 

determinations are made, DOC orders 

CBP to assess AD/CV duties at rates 

determined by the DOC. The importer of 

record is responsible for paying these 

duties. 

AD duties are appropriate where the 

DOC determines that a foreign firm 

‘‘dumps’’ merchandise in the U.S. 

market, i.e. sells merchandise in the 

U.S. market at a price lower than its fair 

value. CV duties are appropriate when 

a foreign government unfairly 

subsidizes its industries that export to 

the United States. The purpose of AD/

CV duties is to counteract the unfair 

advantages that the foreign 

manufacturer achieves through the 

dumping and/or subsidy practices. 

Normally, CBP, upon instructions 

from the DOC, suspends the liquidation 

of entries of merchandise subject to 

additional antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties until the DOC 

instructs CPB to remove the suspension 

and liquidate the entries. Pursuant to 

title 19, Code of Federal Regulations, 

section 159.58 (19 CFR 159.58), CBP 

notifies concerned importers, 

consignees or their agents that 

liquidation of their entries has been 

suspended. The length of time for which 

an AD/CVD entry will be suspended 

depends, in part, on whether DOC 

conducts an administrative review. 

Also, if a decision by DOC regarding 

AD/CVD entries is challenged in the 

Court of International Trade (CIT), 

which happens frequently, the length of 

time of the suspension of liquidation 

may be increased dramatically. 

Consequently, liquidation of these types 

of entries may occur several years after 

the merchandise is originally entered 

and at AD/CVD rates that differ from the 

rate at the time of initial entry. For this 

reason, CBP may need to review the 

physical entry documents to determine 

the correct AD/CVD rate at liquidation. 

Depending upon the amount of 

information provided by the importer to 

CBP via their ABI transmission, CBP 

may not be able to determine various 

factors that are needed to assess the 

final margin. These factors may include 

the nature and amount of the 

merchandise, the producer of the goods, 

and the identity of the exporter.

Upon the completion of the various 

investigations and reviews, it is possible 

that an entry may be subject at 

liquidation to AD/CV duties in addition 

to those already assessed, may be 

liquidated as entered or may be 

liquidated at a different AD/CVD rate 

than previously deposited. For example, 

if it is finally determined that the 

subject merchandise was not subject to 

AD/CV duties, then a full refund may be 

in order. 

Many AD/CVD entries stored at 6 

World Trade Center were among those 

documents destroyed in the terrorist 

attack on September 11, 2001. The 

destroyed documents include those 

related to AD/CVD entries filed at the 

New York Seaport (port code 1001) and 

Newark/Elizabeth, N.J. (port code 4601, 

and sub-ports 4602, etc.). Although less 

likely, the destroyed documents may 

also include documents related to AD/

CVD entries filed at JFK Airport/

Jamaica/Queens NY, (port code 4701 

and sub-ports 4702, etc.). Due to the 

extended liquidation cycle of AD/CVD 

entries, CBP is only now beginning to 

receive liquidation instructions from the 

DOC for these entries. Therefore, CPB is 

providing importers with the option to 

provide a reconstructed entry summary 

package to CBP for liquidation, when 

the suspension of liquidation of that 

importer’s entry, or entries, has been 

lifted. Importers are provided public 

notice of the lifting of liquidation 

suspension. Any party awaiting the 

lifting of liquidation suspension by the 

DOC regarding its AD/CVD entry, or 

entries, should review the Federal 

Register on a regular basis. Any party 

unsure whether their entry or entries are 

affected by this notice, or with any other 

questions regarding a specific entry 

summary package, should call the 

appropriate telephone number provided 

in this notice or should contact the 

Import Specialist Team(s) to whom the 

entries were assigned. 

Requirements; Failure To Timely 

Provide Reconstructed Entry Summary 

Package 

It is in the importer’s interest to 

provide the reconstructed entry 

summary package to CBP no later than 

30 days following publication by the 

DOC that suspension of liquidation of 

the subject entry, or entries, has been 

lifted. Upon receipt of final assessment 

instructions from the Department of 

Commerce, CBP will begin the process 

of liquidating the entries based upon the 

information available (which may not be 

complete) within the Automated 

Commercial System (ACS). 

Protests 

As usual, CBP will consider timely 

protests, submitted pursuant to 19 CFR, 

part 174, of its liquidation of any entry 

or entries.

Dated: August 17, 2005. 

Jayson P. Ahern, 

Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field 

Operations.

[FR Doc. 05–17045 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–06–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Transportation Security Administration 

[Docket No. TSA–2005–21866; Amendment 

Nos. 1520–3, 1540–6, 1562–1] 

Intent to Request Renewal From OMB 

of One Current Public Collection of 

Information: Enhanced Security 

Procedures at Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport

AGENCY: Transportation Security 

Administration (TSA), DHS.

ACTION: Notice of approval and 

extension. 

SUMMARY: TSA invites public comment 

on one currently approved information 

collection requirement abstracted below 

that we will submit to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

renewal in compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act.

DATES: Send your comments by October 

25, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Katrina Wawer, Information 

Collection Specialist, Office of 

Transportation Security Policy, TSA–9, 

Transportation Security Administration, 

601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 

22202–4220.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Katrina Wawer at the above address or 

by telephone (571) 227–1995 or 

facsimile (571) 227–2594.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information, 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. Therefore, in preparation for