alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 854/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 854/2014 of 5 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 854/2014                     

# of 5 August 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 August 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,127
<INVENTORY>                                        349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,665
<PP&E>                                           8,980
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,270
<BONDS>                                            829
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,192
<SALES>                                          2,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,524
<CGS>                                              767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    12
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  94
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,138)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,138)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 22.1**

 

Company Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries of AmericanSkiing Company, a Delaware corporation:

 

ASC Utah, a wholly-ownedMaine corporation

ASC Leasing, Inc., awholly-owned Maine corporation

Blunder Bay Development,Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Grand Summit ResortHotel Sales, Inc., 80% owned Maine corporation

Sunday River SkiwayCorporation, a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Sunday RiverTransportation, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Sunday River, Ltd., awholly-owned Maine corporation

Perfect Turn, Inc., awholly-owned Maine corporation;

L.B.O. Holding, Inc., awholly-owned Maine corporation

SRH, Inc. (fka SugarbushResort Holdings, Inc.) a wholly-owned Vermont corporation

S-K-I, Ltd., awholly-owned Delaware corporation

American Skiing CompanyResort Properties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

Steamboat Ski and ResortCorporation, a wholly-owned Delaware corporation

Heavenly Valley Ski& Resort Corporation, a wholly-owned Delaware corporation

Heavenly Corporation, awholly-owned Delaware corporation

 

Subsidiariesof ASC Utah:

CommunityWater Company, a wholly owned Utah corporation

 

Subsidiariesof Steamboat Ski & Resort Corporation:

WaltonPond Apartments, Inc., a 90% owned Delaware corporation

 

Subsidiariesof S-K-I, Ltd.:

Killington,Ltd., a wholly-owned Vermont corporation

SugarloafMountain Corporation, a wholly-owned Maine corporation

SKIInsurance Company, a wholly-owned Vermont corporation

MountSnow, Ltd, a wholly-owned Vermont corporation

PicoSki Area Management Company, a wholly-owned Vermont corporation

KillingtonWest Ltd., a wholly-owned California corporation

 

Subsidiariesof Killington, Ltd.:

KillingtonRestaurants, Inc., a wholly-owned Vermont corporation

 

Subsidiariesof Sugarloaf Mountain Corporation:

Mountainside,a wholly-owned Maine corporation

SugarloafLand Partners I, a 10% owned Maine partnership

SugarloafLand Partners II, a 10% owned Maine partnership

 

Subsidiaryof Mount Snow, Ltd.:

DoverRestaurants, Inc., a wholly-owned Vermont corporation

 

Subsidiaryof Pico Ski Area Management Company:

UplandsWater Company, a 92.5% owned Vermont corporation

 

Subsidiariesof American Skiing Company Resort Properties, Inc.:

GrandSummit Resort Properties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

SteamboatResort Properties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

TheCanyons Resort Properties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

HeavenlyResort Properties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

SugarloafResort Properties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

KillingtonResort Properties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

 

----

 

MountSnow Resort Properties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

SundayRiver Resort Properties, Inc., a wholly-owned Maine corporation

WhisperRidge, Inc. (fka Attitash Resort Properties, Inc.), a wholly-owned Mainecorporation

 

2

----
STATE v. Charles Gray PAYNE.

No. 114P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

R. Marcus Lodge, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been ] entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of March 2008 by Defendant for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of April 2008."
William L. BROWN v. Mark P. ELLIS.

No. 389P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown.

T. Keith Black, William F. Patterson, Jr., Greensboro, for Ellis.

Prio report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 646 S.E.2d 408.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of April 2008 by Plaintiff for Leave to Supplement Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Notice of Appeal and Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of April 2008."
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3550 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3550


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2008

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To designate a portion of the Rappahannock River in the Commonwealth of 
               Virginia as the ``John W. Warner Rapids''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN W. WARNER RAPIDS, FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Designation.--The portion of the Rappahannock River comprised 
of the manmade rapids located at the site of the former Embrey Dam in 
Fredericksburg, Virginia, and centered at the coordinates of N. 38.3225 
latitude, W. 077.4900 longitude, shall be known and designated as the 
``John W. Warner Rapids''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the portion of the 
Rappahannock River referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 
a reference to the John W. Warner Rapids.

            Passed the Senate September 24 (legislative day, September 
      17), 2008.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 73/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 73/2014 of 27 January 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 73/2014                     

# of 27 January 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 January 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Lauren P. Silvernail, hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                     |  |                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated August 6, 2009 |  | /s/ Lauren P. Silvernail                                         
|                     |  | Lauren P. Silvernail                                             
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate
Development

This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3331 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require that the payment 

of the manufacturers’ excise tax on recreational equipment be paid quarterly. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24 (legislative day, JULY 23), 2008 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

that the payment of the manufacturers’ excise tax on 

recreational equipment be paid quarterly. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Firearms Fairness and 

5 Affordability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF MANUFACTURERS’ EXCISE 

7 TAX ON RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 6302 of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to mode or 

10 time of collection) is amended to read as follows: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3331 IS

1 ‘‘(d) TIME FOR PAYMENT OF MANUFACTURERS’ EX2 CISE TAX ON RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT.—The taxes 

3 imposed by subchapter D of chapter 32 of this title (relat4 ing to taxes on recreational equipment) shall be due and 

5 payable on the date for filing the return for such taxes.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply to articles sold by the manufac8 turer, producer, or importer after the date of the enact9 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

633 

TP 15-02031 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF JOSE MARTINEZ, PETITIONER, 

V ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK 

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY 

SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATHLEEN M. TREASURE

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Michael M.

Mohun, A.J.], entered December 3, 2015) to review a determination of

respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that

petitioner had violated various inmate rules. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously

confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. 

Entered: July 1, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
RUSSO v. FOOD LION.

No. COA06-520.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #950433).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
McNEIL v. HILL

No. COA06-827

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Forsyth (03CVS1199).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), effective as of August 1, 2010 by and between Ampio
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and David Bar-Or M.D. (the “Executive”) is made as of July 28, 2016 (“Amendment Date”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive (together the “Parties”) entered into the Employment Agreement; 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to extend the term of the Employment Agreement through July 31, 2017; and

 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to modify the Employment Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 

1.          The first sentence of Section 1 of the Employment Agreement shall be replaced in
its entirety with the following sentence: 
 “The Company hereby agrees to employ Employee and Employee hereby
accepts such employment with the Company for the period of 72 months beginning on the Effective Date.” 

2.          All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Date written above. 

 

			
	AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Philip H Coelho                            
	Its:	 	Chairman of the Compensation Committee
	
	 /s/ David Bar-Or

	David Bar-Or, M.D.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 389 

To increase the number of Federal judgeships, in accordance with recommendations by the Judicial Conference, in districts that have an 

extraordinarily high immigration caseload. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2007 

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself, Mr. KYL, Mrs. HUTCHISON, and Mr. CORNYN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To increase the number of Federal judgeships, in accordance 

with recommendations by the Judicial Conference, in districts that have an extraordinarily high immigration caseload. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGESHIPS. 

4 The President shall appoint, by and with the advice 

5 and consent of the Senate, such additional district court 

6 judges as are necessary to carry out the 2005 rec7 ommendations of the Judicial Conference for district 

8 courts in which the criminal immigration filings repmstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS

2 

•S 389 IS

1 resented more than 50 percent of all criminal filings for 

2 the 12-month period ending September 30, 2004. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Charles B. Cook, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MSB Financial, Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

> a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
> registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
> 
> b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
> as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and
> 
> c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
> or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
> ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
> 
> b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2004

\s\Charles B. Cook

Charles B. Cook, President and Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. BAILEY.

No. COA08-3.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS64686).

Case reported without published opinion. No error at trial. Remanded for correction of judgment..