alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCWC-13-0005700 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

MATHEW LAWSON, Petitioner/Appellant-Appellant,

vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent/Appellee-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0005700; CIV. NO. 13-1-1331) ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the abovereferenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for certiorari was filed, see Hawai # i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s application for writ of certiorari, filed March 3, 2015, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0005700 09-MAR-2015 09:24 AMthe application is extended in accordance with this rule.”). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 9, 2015. Mathew Lawson petitioner pro se /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Numbers 333-107792) andon Form S-8 (File Number 333-112109) of Boston Properties Limited Partnership of our report dated March 14, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston, MA 

March 14, 2005
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

s0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140546

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140546 COA: 289430 Bay CC: 06-010190-FC MARK ANTHONY WILLSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
In the Matter of A.P.

No. 534A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2007.

Theresa A. Boucher, Assistant County Attorney, for Forsyth DSS.

Robert Newman, Asheboro, for Father-Parks.

Gary C. Rhodes, Salisbury, for Hylton.

Randi Weiss, Winston-Salem, for Guardian ad Litem.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of January 2007 by Respondent for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Respondent (Mother-Parks) shall have up to and including the 28th day of February 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of January 2007."
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power
Trust IV (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.






/s/
      Randall D. HolmesName:
                Randall
      D. HolmesTitle:
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                  (Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
                May
      13, 2009







/s/
      Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
                  Jeffrey
      H. StrasbergTitle:
                  Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
                  May
      13, 2009






---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 169 (Thursday, September 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 52099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17370]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Notice of Open Special Meeting of the Advisory Committee of the 
Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank)

    Summary: The Advisory Committee was established by Pub. L. 98-181, 
November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and 
to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import 
Bank of the United States to Congress.
    Time and Place: Tuesday, September 20, 2005, from 9:30 a.m. to 12 
p.m. The meeting will be held at the Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference 
Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.
    Agenda: Agenda items include discussion of renewable energy exports 
and related export financing trends.
    Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral 
questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written 
statement(s) before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a 
photo ID must be presented, and you may contact Teri Stumpf to be 
placed on the attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such 
as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please 
contact, prior to September 16, 2005, Teri Stumpf. Room 1203, 811 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3502 or TDD 
(202) 565-3377.
    Further Information: For further information, contact Teri Stumpf, 
Room 1203, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3502.

Howard A. Schweitzer,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-17370 Filed 8-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
II 

Calendar No. 1063 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3317 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

101 West Main Street in Waterville, New York, as the ‘‘Corporal John 

P. Sigsbee Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2008 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 101 West Main Street in Waterville, New 

York, as the ‘‘Corporal John P. Sigsbee Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORPORAL JOHN P. SIGSBEE POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 101 West Main Street in 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3317 RS

1 Waterville, New York, shall be known and designated as 

2 the ‘‘Corporal John P. Sigsbee Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal John P. 

7 Sigsbee Post Office’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 1063 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3317 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostSigsbee Post Office’’. Waterville, New York, as the ‘‘Corporal John P. al Service located at 101 West Main Street in 

SEPTEMBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 353/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 353/2014 of 7 April 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 353/2014                     

# of 7 April 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 April 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ImproveNet, Inc., a Delaware corporation
( "ImproveNet") on Form 10-KSB, for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,
Homayoon Farsi, Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ImproveNet.

ImproveNet, Inc.

/s/ Homayoon Farsi
------------------------------
Homayoon Farsi
Acting Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2005
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

|Subsidiaries |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation       
|------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|1.           |  | Sweet Factory Group, Inc.*          
|2.           |  | Sweet Factory, Inc.*                
|3.           |  | SF Properties, Inc.*                
|4.           |  | SF Candy Company*                   
|5.           |  | Laura Secord Holdings Corp.         
|6.           |  | Archibald Candy (Canada) Corporation

*
Dissolved as of October 29, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eden Bioscience Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Bradley S. Powell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 1, 2006

                                                /s/ Bradley S. Powell
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Bradley S. Powell
                                                Vice President of Finance, Chief
                                                Financial Officer and Secretary


                                     - 29 -
STATE v. WEBB.

No. COA04-103-2.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from Pitt (02CRS5685, 02CRS5687, 02CRS5688, 02CRS54018).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error. Remanded for correction of clerical error.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6559

GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED; LLOYD L.

WATERS, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-95-2338-WMN)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 12, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.

Attorney General, Wendy A. Kronmiller, Assistant Attorney General,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Richmond v. Prison Health Services, No. CA-95-2338-WMN (D.

Md. Mar. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         326,446
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,503,251
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    453,750
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,195,340
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,187,457
<LOANS>                                     55,406,496
<ALLOWANCE>                                    113,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,812,402
<DEPOSITS>                                  42,213,487
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            793,851
<LONG-TERM>                                    233,308
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,561,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              60,812,402
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,154,929
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               81,870
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                31,011
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,267,810
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,079,667
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,143,825
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,123,985
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             420,575
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                540,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,027,094
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,027,094
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   677,882
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.77
<LOANS-NON>                                    113,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   379,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               272,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               113,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              113,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           113,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 941/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 941/2013 of 1 October 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 941/2013                     

# of 1 October 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.