alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>    
All information is at September 30, 1998 or for the three months
ended September 30, 1998
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           167
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         2,024
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         1,200
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           1,200
<LOANS>                                      127,821 
<ALLOWANCE>                                      100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               134,734
<DEPOSITS>                                    83,602
<SHORT-TERM>                                       0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,804
<LONG-TERM>                                   27,030
<COMMON>                                          17
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                    22,281
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               134,734
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2,352
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 70
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  27
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2,449
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               989
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,421
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,028
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  407
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  631
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       418
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     418  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.11
<LOANS-NON>                                        0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     197
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 100
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      0
<RECOVERIES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                100
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          100
        

</TABLE>
csgs-ex1025bj_220.htm



.

Exhibit 10.25BJ

 

 

SIXTY-SIXTH AMENDMENT

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CSG MASTER SUBSCRIBER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CSG SYSTEMS, INC.

AND

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC

 

 

This Sixty-sixth Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made by and between CSG Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CSG”), and Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Customer”).  CSG and Customer entered into that certain Amended and Restated CSG Master Subscriber Management System Agreement dated February 9, 2009 (CSG document no. 2298875), as amended (the “Agreement”), and now desire to further amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.  If the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment shall be in conflict with the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control.  Any terms in initial capital letters or all capital letters used as a defined term but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.  The effective date of this Amendment is the date last signed below (the "Effective Date").  Further, upon execution of this Amendment by the parties, any subsequent reference to the Agreement between the parties shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.  Except as amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect according to their terms. 

 

 

Now, therefore, CSG and Customer agree to the following as of the Effective Date:

 

1.  The parties wish to extend the Agreement through March 6, 2015, in order to finalize terms for a longer extension and therefore Section 1.2 entitled Term shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

"1.2  Term.  Unless earlier terminated pursuant to Sections 6.1, this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and remain in effect thereafter for an initial term expiring on March 6, 2015 (“Initial Term”)." 

 

THIS AMENDMENT is executed on the day and year last signed below to be effective as of the Effective Date.

 


		
	
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC (“CUSTOMER”)

 

By: Charter Communications, Inc., its Manager
	
CSG SYSTEMS, INC. (“CSG”)

	
 

 

By: /s/ Mike Ciszek
	
 

 

By:  /s/ Bret C. Griess

	
 

Title:  VP Billing & Collections
	
 

Title:  EVP & COO

	
 

Name:  Mike Ciszek
	
 

Name:  Bret C. Griess

	
 

Date:  3/5/15
	
 

Date:  3/5/15
STATE v. Thomas Howard DUNCAN.

No. 91A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 10, 2008.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Lisa M. Miles, for Duncan.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of July 2008 by Plaintiff (State of NC) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (State of NC) shall have up to and including the 15th day of July 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of July 2008."
Endorsement


This Endorsement is attached to and made a part of that certain Promissory Note dated August 11,2005, with an original principal balance of $807,650.11, as amended by an Extension of Deed of Trust and Security Agreement dated December 21, 2007, a Note and Trust Deed Modification Agreement of April 2008 dated June 12, 2008, a Note and Trust Deed Modification Agreement of August 2008 dated August 22, 2008, a Note and Trust Deed Modification Agreement of January 2009 dated January 22, 2009 and a Note and Trust Deed Modification Agreement of May 2009 dated May 26, 2009 (collectively, the "Promissory Note"),made by Calais Resources, Inc., and Calais Resources Colorado, Inc. (collectively, the "Maker")to Duane A. Duffy, Glenn E. Duffy, Luke Garvey and James Ober, known as the Duffy Group (collectively, the "Holder").


For valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, Holder hereby, unconditionally transfers, assigns and endorses to Apollo Gold, Inc., a Delaware corporation, all of Holder's right, title and interest in and to the Promissory Note and all forms of collateral and security under the Promissory Note. This transfer, assignment and endorsement is made without recourse to Holder, provided nothing in the foregoing is intended to alter, amend, or waive any enforcement rights against the Maker of the Promissory Note.


/s/ Duane A. Duffy

Duane A. Duffy
/s/ Glenn E. Duffy

Glenn E. Duffy/s/ James Ober

James Ober
/s/ Luke Garvey

Luke Garvey
971.57306
# C_2023035EN.01006502.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/65

---

Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Mission v Commission

(Case T-700/22)

(2023/C 35/82)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Mission — Trading, Gestão e Serviços, Unipessoal, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.

---
National City                         National City Mortgage Co.
Mortgage                              3232 Newmark Drive Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
                                      Telephone (937) 910-1200

                                      Mailing Address:
                                      P.O. 1820
                                      Dayton, Ohio 45401-1820



                    Management's Assertion on Compliance with
                  Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the
             Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

                              Report of Management

We, as members  of  management  of  National  City  Mortgage  Co.  (NCM), are
responsible for complying with the minimum  servicing  standards as set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP).  We are also responsible  for  establishing  and
maintaining effective internal control over compliance with these standards.  We
have  performed an evaluation  of NCM's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards  as set  forth in the USAP as of  December  3l,  1997 and for the year
then  ended.  Based on this evaluation,  we assert  that  during the year ended
December 3l, 1997,  NCM  complied,  in all material  respects,  with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same period,  NCM had in effect a fidelity bond policy in the
amount of $50  million and an errors and  omissions  policy in the amount of $20
million.

                                         /s/Leo E. Knight, Jr.
                                         Leo E. Knight, Jr., President

                                        /s/T. Jackson Case Jr.
                                        T. Jackson Case Jr., Sr. Vice President

January 29,1998


                               No one Cares More !
IN RE W.H.P.

No. COA08-176.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 21, 2008.

Certification Date November 10, 2008.

Appeal from Iredell (07JB66).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated.
STATE v. FULLER.

No. COA07-1450.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 15, 2008.

Certification Date August 4, 2008.

Appeal from Alamance (05CRS59313).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# The Social Security (Invalid Care Allowance) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2014 No. 121

Social Security

# The Social Security (Invalid Care Allowance) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

24th April 2014

Coming into operation

20th May 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (6.4.2015) by The Social Security (Invalid Care Allowance) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2015 (S.R. 2015/153), regs. 1, **3**
# Council Decision of 30 July 2014 appointing two Croatian members and four Croatian alternate members of the Committee of the            Regions (2014/521/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 30 July 2014

# appointing two Croatian members and four Croatian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/521/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the CroatianGovernment,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)Following the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union, the Committee of the Regions should be enlarged                              by the appointment of nine members and nine alternate members representing regional and local bodies in Croatia. On 1 July                              2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/342/EU(3) appointing eight Croatian members and nine Croatian alternate members until 25 January 2015. A member's seat on the Committee                              of the Regions has therefore remained vacant since the adoption of Decision 2013/342/EU.

(3)A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Ivan JAKOVČIĆ.

(4)Four alternate members' seats have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Miroslav ČAČIJA, Ms Blanka                              GLAVICA-JEČMENICA, Mr Andrija RUDIĆ and Ms Ivana POSAVEC KRIVEC.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which                     runs until 25 January 2015:                  

as members:
                -  Mr Valter FLEGO, *Prefect of Istra County*                                   
                -  Mr Željko TURK, *Mayor of the City of Zaprešić*.                                  

and

as alternate members:
                -  Mr Ivan VUČIĆ, *Prefect of Karlovac County*                                   
                -  Mr Alojz TOMAŠEVIĆ, *Prefect of Požega-Slavonia County*                                   
                -  Ms Jasna PETEK, *Deputy Prefect of Krapina-Zagorje County*                                   
                -  Mr Damir DEKANIĆ, *Mayor of Municipality of Andrijaševci*.                                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.                           

3

OJ L 183, 2.7.2013, p. 8.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 396/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 396/2014 of 16 April 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative            prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 396/2014                     

# of 16 April 2014

# amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No                           234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1) and in particular Article 183(b) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Commission Regulation (EC) No 1484/95(2) lays down detailed rules for implementing the system of additional import duties and fixes representative prices in the poultrymeat                              and egg sectors and for egg albumin.

(2)Regular monitoring of the data used to determine representative prices for poultrymeat and egg products and for egg albumin                              shows that the representative import prices for certain products should be amended to take account of variations in price                              according to origin.

(3)Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 should be amended accordingly.

(4)Given the need to ensure that this measure applies as soon as possible after the updated data have been made available, this                              Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 April 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### “‘ANNEX I

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 47.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2005-21706; Airspace Docket No. 05-ACE-23]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Washington, MO.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC, Ocotber 27, 2005.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administratioin, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2524.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 20, 2005 (70 FR 41610). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on October 27, 2005. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO on August 23, 2005.

Elizabeth S. Wallis,

Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.

[FR Doc. 05-17570  Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# C_2023127EN.01001902.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 19 January 2023 — SIA Citadeles nekustamie īpašumi v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-22/23, Citadeles nekustamie īpašumi)

(2023/C 127/23)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Administratīvā rajona tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SIA Citadeles nekustamie īpašumi

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the concept of ‘company service provider’ set out in Article [3](7)(c) of Directive 2015/849 (1) to be interpreted as referring to a discrete service which does not arise from a transaction involving the letting of self-owned real estate and is not linked to such a transaction, irrespective of whether or not the [lessor] has consented to the lessee registering its registered office at the leased property and carrying out transactions there? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the concept of ‘company service provider’ set out in Article [3](7)(c) of Directive 2015/849 (1) to be interpreted as referring to a discrete service which does not arise from a transaction involving the letting of self-owned real estate and is not linked to such a transaction, irrespective of whether or not the [lessor] has consented to the lessee registering its registered office at the leased property and carrying out transactions there?

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the negative, is the concept of ‘company service provider’ set out in Article [3](7)(c) of Directive 2015/849 to be interpreted as meaning that, where a natural person lets a property, that person should be subject to the same requirements as a legal person or legal arrangement, regardless of the factual circumstances, for example, the number of properties which the natural person owns and lets, whether the letting of the property is unrelated to the business, or other circumstances? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the negative, is the concept of ‘company service provider’ set out in Article [3](7)(c) of Directive 2015/849 to be interpreted as meaning that, where a natural person lets a property, that person should be subject to the same requirements as a legal person or legal arrangement, regardless of the factual circumstances, for example, the number of properties which the natural person owns and lets, whether the letting of the property is unrelated to the business, or other circumstances?

---

(1)  Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC (OJ 2015 L 141, p. 73).

---