alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. 552b].

# AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:

Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

10:30 a.m., Wednesday, September 7, 2005.

# PLACE:

5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.

# STATUS:

Open.

#  MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

The meeting is being held to discuss the budget proposal for the fiscal year 2007.

# AGENCY CONTACT:

Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5990.

Dated: August 31, 2005.

Rockne Chickinell,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-17671 Filed 9-1-05; 10:42 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.v.i


Description of Modifications to Consent Decree dated September 30, 2015 among the United States of America, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and The Mosaic Company, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Mosaic dated September 30, 2015 and filed on October 6, 2015


On September 30, 2015, the above-referenced Consent Decree (the “Consent Decree”) was lodged with the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (the “Court”).  On June 17, 2016, the United States of America, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (“Mosaic Fertilizer”) submitted a corrected Consent Decree (the “Corrected Consent Decree”) to the Court, requesting that the Court sign and enter the Corrected Consent Decree as a final judgment.


At the time the Consent Decree was initially lodged with the Court on September 30, 2015, the parties thereto recognized that certain subsequent revisions might be necessary to correct typographical, formatting, cross-reference or other similar errors, or, to make minor clarifications in the language of the documents as lodged.  In addition, minor revisions to the Consent Decree were warranted because since the time of lodging, Mosaic Fertilizer made certain minor changes in its operations, and also initiated action on certain of the projects to be required under the Consent Decree.  The parties agreed that the modifications to the Consent Decree are non-material, and fall into the following general categories:


		
	1.
	Correction of typographical, grammatical, or formatting errors;


		
	2.
	Correction of cross-references to other parts of the Consent Decree or to cited regulations;


		
	3.
	Assuring the use of consistent terms of art, definitions, or references;


		
	4.
	Revisions to account for the passage of time between lodging and prospective entry, with respect to a few, minor events or activities that have occurred in the interim; 


		
	5.
	Clarifications to language, which in a few instances appeared to be arguably ambiguous and warranted re-wording to avoid any future confusion about the agreed intent of the parties; and 


		
	6.
	Revisions deemed necessary by the United States to conform to language currently being adopted in other cases in its national enforcement initiative.




Counsel for the plaintiffs and counsel for the defendant jointly represented to the Court that none of the changes are material in any respect to the obligations of Mosaic Fertilizer under the terms of the Consent Decree and do not rise to the level of a modification of the parties’ agreement in the Consent Decree.
STATE v. LUGO.

No. COA07-906.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 5, 2008.

Certification Date August 25, 2008.

Appeal from Macon (05CRS51668).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.
# C_2023189EN.01003601.xml

| 30.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/36

---

Action brought on 8 April 2023 — Innovation & Entrepreneurship Business School v EUIPO — Thinksales (Sales School Powered by IEBS)

(Case T-182/23)

(2023/C 189/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Innovation & Entrepreneurship Business School, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: L. Torrents Homs, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thinksales, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark Sales School Powered by IEBS — Application for registration No 18 274 899

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 February 2023 in Case R 834/2022-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it relates to the goods and services covered by the trade mark at issue in respect of which registration was refused; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it relates to the goods and services covered by the trade mark at issue in respect of which registration was refused;

| — | grant full registration of the trade mark at issue; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant full registration of the trade mark at issue;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings and order Thinksales to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings and order Thinksales to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 
30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000930404
<NAME>       MVE Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          9,933 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  32,631 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (989) 
<INVENTORY>                                    28,752 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               76,546       
<PP&E>                                         43,783      
<DEPRECIATION>                               (13,958)    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                156,068      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          37,956    
<BONDS>                                       141,680  
<COMMON>                                            2 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          47,000 
<PREFERRED>                                     8,331 
<OTHER-SE>                                          0       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  156,068         
<SALES>                                        47,491          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0          
<CGS>                                          33,834          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               11,070       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,211       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,624)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (650)      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (974)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                     (1,677)  
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,651) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023045EN.01002601.xml

| 6.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/26

---

Action brought on 12 December 2022 — Desimo v EUIPO — Red Bull (EL TORO ROJO)

(Case T-778/22)

(2023/C 45/34)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Desimo, Lda (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: S. Estima Martins, J. Mioludo and D. Simões, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark EL TORO ROJO — Application for registration No 18 026 515

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2022 in Case R 326/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and fully dismiss the opposition proceeding No B003089768; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and fully dismiss the opposition proceeding No B003089768;

| — | grant the registration of the trade mark at issue to all the designated goods and services; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the registration of the trade mark at issue to all the designated goods and services;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

     The following sets forth all of the direct and indirect subsidiaries of
Omega Cabinets, Ltd.  If indented, the corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the corporation under which it is listed.

                                                           JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT                           OF INCORPORATION
------------------------------                           ----------------

Omega Kitchen Craft Holdings Corp.                       Delaware

     Omega Kitchen Craft of Canada Ltd.(1)               Canada

        Kitchen Craft Cabinetry Ltd.                     Canada

     Omega Kitchen Craft U.S. Corp.                      Delaware

        Bulrad Illinois, Inc.                            Illinois

Panther Transport, Inc.                                  Iowa


(1) Omega Kitchen Craft Holdings Corp. owns 100% of the Class A Common Stock.
Omega Kitchen Craft Holdings Corp. does not own any of the Class B Common Stock.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 52380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17541]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6666-9]


Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7167 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 08/22/2005 
Through 08/26/2005. Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20050351, Draft EIS, SFW, CA, East Contra Costa County Habitat 
Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan, 
Implementation, Incidental Take Permit, Cities of Brentwood, Clayton, 
Oakley and Pittsburg, Contra Costa County, CA, Comment Period Ends: 10/
17/2005, Contact: Sheila Larsen 916-444-6600.
EIS No. 20050352, Final Supplement, NPS, WA, Elwha River Ecosystem 
Restoration Implementation Project, Update Information, Olympic 
Peninsula, Challam County, WA, Wait Period Ends: 10/03/2005, Contact: 
Brian Winter 360-565-1320.
EIS No. 20050353, Draft EIS, FHW, NY, Willis Avenue Bridge 
Reconstruction, Proposing Reconstruction of 100-year old Willis Avenue 
Bridge over the Harem River between Manhattan and the Bronx, New York 
and Bronx Counties, NY, Comment Period Ends: 10/28/2005, Contact: 
Robert Arnold 518-431-4125.
EIS No. 20050354, Draft EIS, UAF, 00, Shaw Air Base Airspace Training 
Initiative (ATI), 20th Fighter Wing Proposal to Modify the Training 
Airspace Overlying Parts, South Carolina and Georgia, Comment Period 
Ends: 10/17/2005, Contact: Linda A. DeVine 757-764-9434.
EIS No. 20050355, Draft EIS, COE, LA, Port of Iberia Project, To 
Determine the Feasibility of Deepening the Existing Navigation Channels 
between the POI and the Gulf of Mexico, Portions of the Gulf 
Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW) and Freshwater Bayou (FWB), LA, Comment 
Period Ends: 10/17/2005, Contact: Michael Salyer 504-862-2037.
EIS No. 20050356, Draft EIS, FRC, TX, Port Arthur Liquefield Natural 
Gas (LNG) Project, Construction and Operation, U.S. Army COE Section 10 
and 404 Permits, (FERC/EIS-0182D), Jefferson and Orange Counties TX and 
Cameron, Calcasieu and Beauregard Parishes, LA, Comment Period Ends: 
10/17/2005, Contact: Thomas Russo 1-866-208-FERC.

Amended Notices

    EIS No. 20050342, Draft EIS, NOA, 00, Consolidated Atlantic Highly 
Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Tunas, 
Swordfish, and Shark and the Atlantic Billfish Fishery Management Plan, 
Implementation, Atlantic Coast, Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico, Comment 
Period Ends: 10/18/2005, Contact: Karyl Brewster Geisz 301-713-2347 
Revision of Notice Published in FR: 08/19/2005. Correction to Comment 
Period from 10/03/2005 to 10/18/2005.

    Dated: August 30, 2005.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 05-17541 Filed 9-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Fannton Dumu CUMMINGS.

No. 93P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Fannton Dumu Cummings, Pro Se.

Mark A. Davis, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C. App. ___, 656 S.E.2d 329.

*744*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th day of February 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-43248, 333-56122, 333-104725, 333-115039, 333-123587, and 333-132792) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Active Power, Inc. of our reports datedMay 10, 2007, with respect to the financial statements of Active Power, Inc., Active Power, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of Active Power, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & YoungLLP 

Austin, Texas 

May 10, 2007
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER



I, Mark P. Colonnese, certify that:



1.          I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Transgenomic, Inc.; and



2.          Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report.



|September 5, 2014 | By: | /s/ Mark P. Colonnese                                                 | 
|----------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                  |     | Mark P. ColonneseExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Samuel Eugene ELLIS, Jr.

No. 133P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2008.

Mark Montgomery, Durham, for Ellis.

*314Charles E. Reece, Assistant Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 657 S.E.2d 51.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of March 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
Exhibit 31.2

      I, Derrell W. Chapman, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of East Texas
Financial Services, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
      date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

            c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
      internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
      record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
      for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
      controls; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

      6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 14, 2003


/s/ Derrell W. Chapman
----------------------
Derrell W. Chapman
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
  and Chief Operating Officer


                                    28 of 29
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 435 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 435

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to preserve the essential air 
                            service program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2007

    Mr. Bingaman (for himself, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Enzi, Ms. 
Collins, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
   Specter, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, and Mr. Sanders) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to preserve the essential air 
                            service program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Essential Air Service Preservation 
Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EAS LOCAL PARTICIPATION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 417 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by striking section 41747, and such title shall 
be applied as if such section 41747 had not been enacted.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The chapter analysis at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 41747.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Abu-Bakr RAHMAN.

No. 182P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Ann B. Wall, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of April 2007 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review Under G.S. 7A-31:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of December 2007."