alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference call of the South Carolina Advisory Committee will convene at 2 p.m. (e.s.t.) and adjourn at 3:30 a.m. (e.s.t.) on Thursday, September 22, 2005. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the Committee's work on its project, Unitary Status of School Districts in South Carolina. 

This conference call is available to the public through the following call-in number: 800-473-7795, conference contact name Peter Minarik. Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and contact name, Peter Minarik. 

To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting Peter Minarik, Regional Director, Southern Regional Office, (404) 562-7000 (TDD/TTY 404-562-7004), by Tuesday, September 20, 2005. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, August 29, 2005. 

Ivy Davis, 

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 05-17619 Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7257** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. TONI GWYNETT JONES, a/k/a Tone

- Tone , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5:03

- cr - 00037

- RLV

- 8 )

Submitted : November 29, 2012 Decided: December 11, 2012

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Toni Gwynett Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Gretchen C. F. Shappert, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTI CE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Toni Gwynett Jones appeals the district court ’ s order denying her motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones , No. 5:03

- cr - 00037

- RLV

- 8 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and le gal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
FARM BUREAU v. ARMWOOD, et al.

No. 99A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 23, 2007.

R. Michael Strickland, Glenn C. Raynor, Raleigh, for N.C. Farm Bureau.

Frank A. Cassiano, Jr., Greenville, John Bramble, Charles David Creech, New Bern, for Armwood, et al.

James W. Bryan, Daniel W. Koenig, Greensboro, for Trucking Industry Defense Asso.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of April 2007 by Amici for Extension of Time to File Amici Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Amici (PCI and AIA) shall have up to and including the 23rd day of April 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of April 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 370 

To designate the headquarters building of the Department of Education 

in Washington, DC, as the Lyndon Baines Johnson Federal Building. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2007 

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate the headquarters building of the Department 

of Education in Washington, DC, as the Lyndon Baines 

Johnson Federal Building. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The headquarters building of the Department of 

5 Education located at 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Wash6 ington, DC, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lyn7 don Baines Johnson Federal Building’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 370 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Lyndon Baines Johnson Federal Building’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-60384 

Conference Calendar

 

DAVID C. BROOKER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ANNETTE TOWNSEND, Sergeant, Disciplinary Chiarperson;

WALTER BOOKER, Superintendent at Parchman;

JAMES ANDERSON, Commissioner; CHARLES THOMAS;

DORA ROSS; DAVID REED; OFFICER BOOKER,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:99-CV-89-S-B

--------------------

June 15, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David C. Brooker, Mississippi inmate #78460, appeals the

denial of his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim. Brooker’s

argument that the disciplinary hearing was unfair because the

hearing officers relied only on what the charging officer stated

and not on Brooker’s evidence does not state a claim for which

relief can be granted. See Reeves v. Pettcox, 19 F.3d 1060, 1062
No. 99-60384 

-2-

(5th Cir. 1994). Brooker’s claim that he was not given the

opportunity to be heard lacks a factual predicate. Because

Brooker does not make his district court argument that he was

retaliated against for filing the instant suit, that issue is

deemed waived. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224 (5th Cir.

1993). 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,797,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,514,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     887,774,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (48,460,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             878,424,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    369,952,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                       376,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 468,361,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               878,424,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,858,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,071,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,513,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,274,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,274,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,274,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,274,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                          EXHIBIT 24(b)

                            SOLUTIA INC.

                            CERTIFICATE

     I, Karen L. Knopf, Assistant Secretary of Solutia Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify that the following is a full, true and
correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Company on February 28, 2001, at which meeting a quorum was present and
acting throughout:

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that each officer and director who may be
     required to sign and execute the 10-K or any document in
     connection therewith (whether for and on behalf of the Company, or
     as an officer or director of the Company, or otherwise), be and
     hereby is authorized to execute a power of attorney appointing
     Karl R. Barnickol, Karen L. Knopf and Mary B. Cody, or any of them
     acting alone, his or her true and lawful attorney or attorneys to
     sign in his or her name, place and stead in any such capacity such
     Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto and
     documents in connection therewith, and to file the same with the
     Commission or any other governmental body, each of said attorneys
     to have power to act with or without the others, and to have full
     power and authority to do and perform, in the name and on behalf
     of each of said officers and directors, every act whatsoever which
     such attorneys, or any one of them, may deem necessary,
     appropriate or desirable to be done in connection therewith as
     fully and to all intents and purposes as such officers or
     directors might or could do in person.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand in my official
capacity and affixed the corporate seal of the Company this 1st day of
March, 2001.



                                    /s/ Karen L. Knopf
                                    --------------------------------
                                         Karen L. Knopf
                                         Assistant Secretary


SEAL
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TOSECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the
three month period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas P. Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of the
General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge and beliefs:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|    |                                                              |  |  | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  | 
|/s/ | DOUGLASP. WILLIAMS                                           |  |  | 
|    |                                                              |  |  | 
|    | Douglas P. WilliamsChief Financial OfficerNovember 13 , 2002 |  |  |
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alvin A. Hirsch, the Chief Financial Officer of Mile Marker International,
Inc. (the "Company"), have executed this certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 1st
day of November, 2005.


/s/ Alvin A. Hirsch
--------------------
    Alvin A. Hirsch
Chief Financial Officer


                                       21
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (1) Registration
Statement (Form S-8/S-3 No. 333-81755) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Plan and
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Covad Communications Group, Inc., (2)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-35632) pertaining to 1997 Stock Option
Plan of Laser Link.net, Inc. and (3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-49984) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan of BlueStar
Communications Group, Inc. of our report dated March 5, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Covad Communications Group, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


Walnut Creek, California                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 14, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the Employee Equity Participation Incentive Plan and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Management Incentive Plan of
Pet Quarters, Inc. of our report dated October 8, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Pet Quarters, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended June 30, 2001.


                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Little Rock, Arkansas
October 8, 2001
# Council Decision of 8 September 2014 appointing a French member of the European Economic and Social Committee (2014/651/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 8 September 2014

# appointing a French member of the European Economic and Social Committee

# (2014/651/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the French Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 13 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and                              Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015(1).

(2)A member's seaton the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of                              Mr Julien VALENTIN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Julien MARRE is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current                     term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.
STATE v. COWAN.

No. COA07-1521.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 20, 2008.

Certification Date June 9, 2008.

Appeal from Iredell (05CRS60613, 06CRS100, 06CRS54509, 06CRS55670, 06CRS55671, 06CRS55672, 06CRS55673).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
HOUSEHOLD REALTY CORP. v. GUINN.

No. COA07-862.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Moore (05CVD1109).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
In the Matter of S.J.M.

No. 363A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 23, 2007.

Beverly Basden, Sanford, for Lee County DSS.

Susan J. Hall, Fayetteville, for Father.

Elizabeth Boone, for GAL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of October 2007 by Respondent (Mother) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Respondent (Mother) shall have up to and including the 29th day of October 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of October 2007."
STATE v. PAYNE.

No. COA07-773.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Caldwell (05CRS52064, 05CRS52065).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
#### In the Matter of William Conroy et al., Respondents, v Town of Woodbury Zoning Board of Appeals, Appellant, et al., Respondents.

[800 NYS2d 762]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the Town of Woodbury Zoning Board of Appeals dated June 25, 2003, as imposed various conditions upon the granting of an area variance, the Town of Woodbury Zoning Board of Appeals appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated January 29, 2004, as granted the petition and annulled the conditions.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

*958“The law is settled that in considering applications for use or area variances, a zoning board is authorized to impose such reasonable conditions as (1) are directly related and incidental to the proposed use of the property, (2) are consistent with the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance, (3) and minimize any adverse impacts resulting from the variance” *(Matter of Baker v Brownlie,*270 AD2d 484, 485 [2000]; *see also*Town Law § 267-b [4]). Here, the appellant, Town of Woodbury Zoning Board of Appeals (hereinafter the Board), granted the petitioners’ application for a side-yard variance subject, inter alia, to the condition that the petitioners plant 15 evergreen trees to provide screening for the adjacent property. While landscape screening can be required in many cases to mitigate adverse visual and noise impacts, the imposition of such a condition here was inconsistent with the Board’s finding in granting the variance that “there has been no evidence that granting the variance would have an undesirable effect on the character of the neighborhood or adversely impact on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district.” Since the Board found that there would be no adverse impact to mitigate, the imposition of mitigating conditions was arbitrary and capricious, and was properly annulled by the Supreme Court *(see Matter of Baker v Brownlie, supra; see also Matter of St. Onge v Donovan,*71 NY2d 507, 518-520 [1988]; *Matter of Rice v Mammina,*287 AD2d 509, 510 [2001]).

In view of the foregoing, we do not reach the Board’s remaining contentions. Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Cozier and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Dennis Marshall CLEMMONS.

No. 91A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 12, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 639 S.E.2d 110 (2007), finding no error in a judgment entered 5 May 2005 by Judge Steve A. Balog in Superior Court, Harnett County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 September 2007.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Francis W. Crawley, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TEKGRAF, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,702,848
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,146,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                   520,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,718,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,219,133
<PP&E>                                       1,216,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                 391,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,155,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,397,909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,328
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,655,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,155,601
<SALES>                                     99,046,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            99,046,966
<CGS>                                       83,621,310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               83,621,310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               348,442
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                578,167
<INCOME-TAX>                                   487,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             91,167
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    91,167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>