alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17723]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


September 8, 2005 Public Hearing

    OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Public Hearing in Conjunction 
with each Board meeting was published in the Federal Register (Volume 
70, Number 158, Page 48446) on August 17, 2005. No requests were 
received to provide testimony or submit written statements for the 
record; therefore, OPIC's public hearing in conjunction with OPIC's 
September 15, 2005 Board of Directors meeting scheduled for 2 p.m. on 
September 8, 2005 has been cancelled.
    Contact Person For Information: Information on the hearing 
cancellation may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, 
via facsimile at (202) 218-0136, or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dab9beb5adb49ab5aab3b9f4bdb5ac"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d5e59524a537d524d545e135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 1, 2005.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-17723 Filed 9-1-05; 2:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
MITCHELL COUNTY v. BUCHANAN.

No. COA07-1307.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Mitchell (07CVD94).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, vacated and remanded in part.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 6, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-332 Lower Tribunal No. 10-1135-K

________________ 

### Francis P. Dudlar, et al., Appellants,

vs. 

### Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., etc., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J. Koenig, Judge. Wesoloski Carlson, P.A., and Erik D. Wesoloski, for appellants. McCalla Raymer Liebert Pierce, LLC, and Charles P. Gufford (Orlando), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 45.031(1)(a),(7), Fla. Stat. (2014); § 45.032(1)(b), Fla.2

Stat. (2014) (“‘Subordinate lienholder’ means the holder of a subordinate lien shown on the face of the pleadings as an encumbrance on the property. . . . A subordinate lienholder includes, but is not limited to, a subordinate mortgage . . . .”); Household Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Bank of Am., N.A., 883 So. 2d 346, 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (“Bank of America was named as a defendant in the mortgage foreclosure as a junior mortgagee. It was entitled to assert its claim to the surplus proceeds.”); see also JP Morgan Chase Bank v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 929 So. 2d 651, 653-54 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (stating rule that “foreclosure of the first [lien] did not extinguish the second; it merely transferred the lien from the property to the surplus funds that took its place” and that “a surplus is payable to junior lienholders in accordance with their priority”).
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 28, 2020 No. 04-19-00781-CV Ernest BUSTOS , Appellant v. BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT, ET AL. ,

Appellee From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-16392 Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On August 11, 2020, we sent appellee Bexar County Appraisal Review Board (“ARB”) a notice that its brief had not been timely filed. On August 21, 2020, ARB responded by letter, requesting an extension of time to file its brief. ARB’s request is GRANTED. ARB’s brief is due to be filed on or before August 31, 2020. ARB states in its letter that it has substituted counsel. If any of ARB’s counsel of record wish to withdraw, counsel must file a motion to withdraw in accordance with Rule 6.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of August, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

                                  TEKGRAF, INC.

                           2001 INCENTIVE PLAN SUMMARY

          Tekgraf, Inc. has adopted an 2001 Incentive Plan (the "Plan") pursuant
to which certain management employees (including all executive officers) will be
entitled to receive cash bonuses if specified performance goals are met. The
Plan is designed as a pay for performance plan. Each eligible employee's bonus
is based not only how well the employee performs individually, but also on how
well the business performs.

          Each eligible employee has been assigned a target bonus of between 8%
and 100% of base salary. This target bonus is then allocated between: (i)
individual objectives (0% to 50%); and (ii) earnings targets for the Company or
the relevant business unit (0% to 100%). The company and each business unit have
been assigned minimum earnings targets.

The portion of the bonus payable for achieving individual objectives will be
payable quarterly, based upon a quarterly assessment by his or her manager and
CEO of the extent to which the eligible employee has met or exceeded the
individual objectives.

The portion of the bonus payable relating to the financial performance of the
company and each business unit will be measured quarterly. Eligible
non-executive employees will receive a quarterly payment in each quarter that
the Company or the relevant business unit achieves or exceeds its minimum
earnings target. Eligible executive employees will receive a semi-annual
payment in each half of the fiscal year that the Company or the relevant
business unit activities or exceeds its minimum earnings target, with 40% of
the bonus earned payable after six months and the remaining bonus earned
deferred to the end of the year. If the relevant minimum earnings targets
have not been met, there will be no payment for that period. The amount of
the payment will depend on the amount by which actual earnings for the
relevant unit exceeds the minimum target. If the actual earnings equal the
minimum target and the participant meets their individual objectives, the
payment will equal 50% of the target bonus. If the actual earnings equal the
budgeted earnings and the participant meets their individual objectives, the
participant will achieve 100% of the target bonus. The actual payment may
exceed the target bonus, if the performance for the relevant unit exceeds the
budgeted amount.

          This Summary is not intended to create or expand any rights of
eligible employees under the Plan. The rights of eligible employee under the
Plan are governed solely by the written notices delivered to each individual
employee.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 64/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 64/2014 of 24 January 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative            prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 64/2014                     

# of 24 January 2014

# amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No                           234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1) and in particular Article 183(b) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Commission Regulation (EC) No 1484/95(2) lays down detailed rules for implementing the system of additional import duties and fixes representative prices in the poultrymeat                              and egg sectors and for egg albumin.

(2)Regular monitoring of the data used to determine representative prices for poultrymeat and egg products and for egg albumin                              shows that the representative import prices for certain products should be amended to take account of variations in price                              according to origin.

(3)Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 should be amended accordingly.

(4)Given the need to ensure that this measure applies as soon as possible after the updated data have been made available, this                              Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 January 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### “‘ANNEX I

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 47.
ELROD v. ELROD.

No. COA08-115.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 19, 2008.

Certification Date September 8, 2008.

Appeal from Buncombe (07CVD4036).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
----

| 1. | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2. | the                  information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                  the                  financial condition and results of operations of the                  Company. |

| Dated: January                  14, 2008 | By: | /s/                  Michael A. Maltzman                      |  |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|                                               |     | Michael                  A. Maltzman                          |
|                                               |     | Chief                  Financial Officer                      |
|                                               |     | (Principal                  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transgenomic, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, I, Craig
J. Tuttle, President and Chief Executive Officer of Transgenomic, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transgenomic, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transgenomic, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transgenomic, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CRAIG J. TUTTLECraig J. TuttlePresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 30, 2009

A signed original of the certification required by Section 906 has been provided to Transgenomic, Inc. and will be retained by Transgenomic, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
53330 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

46 CFR Part 531 

[Docket No. 05–06] 

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier 

Service Arrangements 

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of inquiry; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects a 

portion of the Notice of Inquiry issued 

August 30, 2005. 

DATES: September 1, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, Secretary, Federal 

Maritime Commission, 800 N. Capitol 

St., NW., Room 1046, Washington, DC 

20573–0001, Secretary@fmc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

September 2, 2005, the Federal 

Maritime Commission published a 

Notice of Inquiry requesting public 

comment on possible changes to its 

exemption for non-vessel-operating 

common carriers from certain tariff 

publication requirements of the 

Shipping Act of 1984. On page 52345 of 

the Federal Register, in the third 

column, in the fourth sentence of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, the 

quotation of the Commission’s 

regulation at 46 CFR 531.3(p) 

incorrectly omitted the phrase ‘‘or two 

or more affiliated NVOCCs.’’ The entire 

sentence should read as follows: 

The rule defines an NSA as ‘‘a written 

contract, other than a bill of lading or receipt, 

between one or more NSA shippers and an 

individual NVOCC or two or more affiliated 

NVOCCs, in which the NSA shipper makes 

a commitment to provide a certain minimum 

quantity or portion of its cargo or freight 

revenue over a fixed time period, and the 

NVOCC commits to a certain rate or rate 

schedule and a defined service level.’’ 46 

CFR 531.3(p). 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05–17780 Filed 9–7–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
# C_2023024EN.01004902.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/49

---

Action brought on 11 November 2022 — Norwood v Commission

(Case T-684/22)

(2023/C 24/65)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Norwood — Trading e Serviços, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of LSB Financial Corp. (the "Registrant") that the QuarterlyReport of the Registrant of Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such report fairly present, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant forsuch period.

| Date    August 13, 2004      /S/ RANDOLPH F. WILLIAMSRandolph F. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate    August 13, 2004      /S/ MARY JO DAVIDMary Jo DavidVice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that a conference call of the Ohio Advisory Committee will convene at 1 p.m. and adjourn at 3 p.m., Friday, September 16, 2005. The purpose of the conference call is to provide orientation to new members, approve the report “Hate Crime in Ohio Revisited,” and plan future activities. 

This conference call is available to the public through the following call-in number: 1-800-473-7796, contact name: Lynwood Battle. Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and contact name. 

                    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting Constance M. Davis, Regional Director of the Midwestern Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights at (312) 353-8311, (TDD 312-353-8362), by                     *4 p.m. on Wednesday, September 14, 2005*.                 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, August 25, 2005. 

Ivy L. Davis, 

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 05-17620 Filed 9-2-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
STATE v. Ryan Gabriel GARCELL.

No. 465A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 10, 2008.

Thomas Maher, Ann Marie Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Ryan Gabriel Garcell.

Charlie C. Walker, Asheville, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the second motion filed on the 4th day of March 2008 by State of NC for Extension of Time to File Brief and to File Response to Motion for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Allowed. State of NC shall have up to and including the 14th day of April 2008 to file and serve his/her brief and to respond to Motion for Appropriate Relief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of March 2008."
EARLS v. STARR DAVIS CO., INC.

No. COA07-223.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 18, 2007.

Certification Date January 7, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. 14130).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1614. KATRINA BROWN v. GREENSCAPES DESIGN, LLC.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. After the

magistrate court issued a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant Katrina

Brown appealed to superior court. The superior court also issued a judgment in favor

of the plaintiff, and Brown filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

“[A]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower

courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for discretionary

appeal.” Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003); see also

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Because Brown did not follow the proper procedure for

requesting appellate review in this case, we lack jurisdiction, and this appeal is

hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 21, 2021

07/21/2021
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) by Valeant Pharmaceuticals
International (Registrant), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report. Date: May 10, 2004

/s/ Robert W. OLearyRobert W. OLearyChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer Date: May 10, 2004
    /s/ Bary G. BaileyBary G. BaileyChief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Valeant Pharmaceuticals International and will be furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.