M a tth e w C a te , S e c r e taryo f th e C a lif

o rn iaD e p artm e n t o f

C o rr e c tio n s , is * subst i tut ed for hi s pre dece ss or, J. S . W oo dford, W ar den. F ed. R . A pp . P . 43 (c )( 2). T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt ** e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GREGORY ROSS W HI TE ,

P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v . M A T T H E W C A T E , S e c r e t a ryof the * C al i fo rn i a D ep artm en to f C o rrect i o n s; M A R G A R I T A E . P E R E Z , C ha i rpe r s on, C al i fo rn i a B o ardo f P ri so n T erm s,

R e s p o n d e n ts - A p p e lle e s . N o. 06- 56174 D . C . N o . C V -0 4 -0 5 9 6 8 -S JO ME MOR AN DU M **

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S . J a m e s O t e r o, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M ay7, 2008 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia S ubm i s s i on w i thdr aw n M ay23, 2008 R e s ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r9, 2010 

# FI LED SEP 17 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he H onor abl e J a m e s L . R oba rt , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge f orthe ** * W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof

W a s hi ngt on, s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

2 B ef ore: F IS H E R and B E R Z O N , C i rc ui tJudg es , and R O B A R T , D i stri ctJudg e. *** G re go ryR oss W hi t e app ea l s f rom the j ud gm entof the di stri ctcourt di s m i s s i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s c orpus pe t i t i on c ha l l e ngi ng the 1996 r e s c is s io n o f

p a r o le . W e d is m is s th e ap p e a l a s m o o t. W hi t e f i l ed hi s habea s pet i t i on on Jul y 22, 20 04 , w hi l e he w as i ncar ce rat ed b yth e S ta te o f

C a lif o rn iaa t th e O r e g o n S ta te P e n ite n tiaryin S a le m , O r e g o n . I n h is pet i t i on , W hi t e s ou gh tan order vacat i ng hi s 199 6 p ar ol e r es ci ss i on order, rei n st at i n g h i s p aro l e d at e an dreq u i ri n g th e D ep artm en to f C o rrect i o n s t o rel ease h im f r o m p r is o n “in a c c o r d a n c e w ith th e te rm s o f h is p ar o le .” S up p le m e n t P e t. H ab e a s C o rp u s 1 3 . O n J a n u a ry2 2 , 2 0 1 0 , w h ile th is ap p e a l w a s p e n d in g , W h ite w a s r e l e a s e d on pa r ol e . W hi t e ha s , a c c or di ngl y , be e n gr ant e d the r e l i e f he s ought in h is h ab e a s p e titio n . T h is r e n d e r s h is ap p e a l m o o t. Se e Munozv . R ow land , 104 F . 3d 1096, 1097- 98 ( 9th C i r . 1997) ( “ W e a r e pr e c l ude d byA rt i c l e I I I of the C ons t i tut i on . . . f

r om e nt e rt a i ni ng an appe a l i f the r e i s no l onge ral i ve c a s e or c o n tr o v e r s y .” ) . I n h is s up p le m e n ta l b r ie f , W h ite a r g u e s th a t h is c a s e is n o t m o o t b e c au s e th is c o u rt c o u ldo r d e rh is d is c h a r g e f r o m p ar o le . C

f . Mc Q ui l l i on v . D unc an , 342 F . 3d 1 0 1 2 , 1 0 1 5 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ). W h i t e, h o w ev er, rai ses th i s cl ai m fo r rel i ef fo r th e fi rst3

t i m e i n h i s s up pl em ent albri ef on appeal . W e there fore tre atthi s argum entas w a iv e d . See A l len v. O rnoski , 43 5 F . 3d 94 6, 96 0 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). AP P E AL DI S MI S S E D.