alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WINDING RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a North Carolina not-for-profit Corporation, and Theodore J. Humphrey, III, a natural person v. Zalman JOFFE and wife, Devora Joffe; Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.; Jackie Miller, Trustee; Alston Mason; Tyler Murtaugh; Trip Short; Brooks Weller; and Taylor Harrington.

No. 404A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 7, 2008.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 184 N.C.App. ___, 646 S.E.2d 801 (2007), affirming an order entered on 18 August 2006 by Judge Carl R. Fox in Superior Court, Orange County. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 February 2008.

Brown & Bunch, PLLC, by Charles Gordon Brown, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff-appellees.

The Brough Law Firm, by G. Nicholas Herman, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellants Zalman and Devora Joffe.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons, stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeffrey Shane BURCHFIELD.

No. 311A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Michael E. Casterline, Asheville, for Burchfield.

*818Barbara Shaw, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th day of July 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1205/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1205/2014 of 7 November 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1205/2014                     

# of 7 November 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 November 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
IN RE C.T.H-C.

No. COA08-206.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 17, 2008.

Certification Date July 7, 2008.

Appeal from New Hanover (00J119, 00J120, 04J493).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
#### Joseph Tyberg et al., Appellants, v Israel Neustein, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[800 NYS2d 507]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Torres, J.), dated July 21, 2004, which denied their motion to vacate the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 (b), upon their counsel’s failure to appear on the date set for trial, and to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings.

The action was dismissed when the plaintiffs’ counsel failed to appear on the date set for trial *(see*22 NYCRR 202.27 [b]). To be relieved of the default in appearing, the plaintiffs were required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious cause of action *(see*CFLR 5015 [a] [1]; *Solomon v Ramlall,*18 AD3d 461 [2005]; *Echevarria v Waters,*8 AD3d 330 [2004]; *Precision Envelope Co. v Marcus & Co.,*306 AD2d 263, 264 [2003]). The affirmation of the plaintiffs’ counsel demonstrated a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear on the date of trial *(see Bazzini v Hertz Corp.,*183 AD2d 691 [1992]; *Chery v Anthony,*156 AD2d 414, 416 [1989]; *Berman v Brunswick Hosp. Ctr.,*94 AD2d 736 [1983]; *Hargett v Health & Hosps. Corp. of City of N.Y.,*88 AD2d 633 [1982]). Furthermore, the plaintiffs demonstrated that they have a potentially meritorious cause of action *(see Rosenberg v Equitable Life Assur. Socy. of U.S.,*79 NY2d 663, 668 [1992]; *Carnazza v Shoprite of Staten Is.,*12 AD 3d 393 [2004]; *Kopinska v Metal Bright Maintenance Co.,*309 AD2d 633 [2003]; *Rothstein v State of New York,*284 AD2d 130, 131 [2001]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the motion. Prudent i, *P.J.,*Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350), that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    LEO F. WELLS,
IIILeo F. Wells, III Chief Executive Officer





August 12, 2002
HALL v. TOREROS II, INC.

No. 187PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 17, 2007.

Howard F. Twiggs, Donald H. Beskind, Raleigh, Jesse H. Rigsby, IV, I. Beverly Lake, Jr., for Theresa D. Hall.

Phillip J. Anthony, Christopher J. Derrenbacher, Raleigh, Kathrine E. Downing, for Toreros, II, Inc.

R. Frank Gray, Raleigh, for NC Restaurant & Lodging Asso.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of October 2007 by Plaintiffs for Leave to File Reply Brief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of October 2007."
RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
           CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL MATURO, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT,
    TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.,
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Michael  Maturo,  Executive  Vice  President,  Treasurer and Chief  Financial
Officer of Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (the "Company"),  certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

          1)   The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  of the  Company  for  the
               quarterly  period  ended  June  30,  2004  (the  "Report")  fully
               complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

          2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


Dated: August 9, 2004

                                     By           /s/ Michael Maturo
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President,
                                           Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Reckson  Associates  Realty  Corp.  and will be  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
LEE v. LEE.

No. COA07-979.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 3, 2008.

Certification Date June 23, 2008.

Appeal from Lenoir (98CVD155).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Douglas BARBEE.

No. 45P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Michael Douglas Barbee, Pro Se.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 31st day of January 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 31st day of January 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
Exhibit 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Community Investors Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                  /s/Phillip W. Gerber
                                  --------------------------
                                  Name: Phillip W. Gerber
                                  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 12, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Community Investors Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by
Community Investors Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Enviro Voraxial
Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Alberto DiBella, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/Alberto DiBella
    ------------------
    Alberto DiBella
    Principal Executive Officer
    April 12, 2007
# C_2023329EN.01000901.xml

| 18.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 1 June 2023 — Banco Santander SA v Asociación de Consumidores y Usuarios de Servicios Generales-Auge, on behalf of its members Andrea and Alberto

(Case C-346/23, Banco Santander)

(2023/C 329/11)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Banco Santander SA

Defendants: Asociación de Consumidores y Usuarios de Servicios Generales-Auge, on behalf of its members Andrea and Alberto

Question referred

Referred under Article 267 TFEU, and requesting the interpretation of Article 52(2)(b) of Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004
   (1) on markets in financial instruments:

On the basis that consumer associations have standing to represent in legal proceedings investors/consumers claiming a breach of duty by an investment firm in the marketing of complex financial products, can that standing be restricted exceptionally by national courts, in the context of an individual claim, in cases involving high-worth investors who carry out transactions that cannot be regarded as being of ordinary and widespread use and who bring proceedings under the aegis of a consumer association with the result that they are able to benefit from a possible exemption from legal costs in very high-value court proceedings, avoiding the payment of court fees and avoiding paying the costs of the opposing party in the case of unfounded or even frivolous claims?

---

(1)  Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC (OJ 2004 L 145, p. 1).

---
# Council Decision of 24 June 2014 appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee (2014/411/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 24 June 2014

# appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

# (2014/411/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and                              Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015(1).

(2)A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of                              Ms Bérengère DUPUIS,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Alessandro GRUMELLI, *Conseiller au service d'études de la Confédération des syndicats chrétiens* is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 20 September 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 24 June 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

E. Venizelos                            

1

OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.
# **Exhibit32.2**

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, the Chief Financial Officer of Western Sizzlin Corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007 and the financial statements contained therein, fully complywith the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q and the financialstatements thereto fairly present, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of September 30,2007, and the period then ended.
| /s/ Robyn B. Mabe |   | Date: November 14, 2007 |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------|

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Pinnacle Resources, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Glen R. Gamble
                                     Glen R. Gamble
                     President & Chief Executive Officer

October 9, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARCHIBALD CANDY CORPORATION AS OF AUGUST 30, 1997 AND
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,801
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      764
<ALLOWANCES>                                       188
<INVENTORY>                                     18,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,133
<PP&E>                                          49,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,134
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,700
<OTHER-SE>                                    (35,319)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,660
<SALES>                                        121,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,933
<CGS>                                           42,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                       250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,727
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,898)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,171)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023127EN.01002701.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/27

---

Appeal brought on 17 February 2023 by the European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 8 December 2022 in Case T-769/21, Euranimi v Commission

(Case C-95/23 P)

(2023/C 127/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) (represented by: V. Villante, D. Rovetta, M. Campa, avvocati, P. Gjørtler, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The Appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present appeal admissible;

| — | set aside the order under appeal and declare the action brought by EURANIMI admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order under appeal and declare the action brought by EURANIMI admissible;

| — | send the case back to the General Court for examination of the substance of EURANIMI’s action; |
| --- | --- |

—

send the case back to the General Court for examination of the substance of EURANIMI’s action;

| — | order the European Commission to bear the legal cost of the present appeal and of the procedure at first instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to bear the legal cost of the present appeal and of the procedure at first instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellant relies on three main grounds of appeals:

First ground of appeal: Error in law in interpreting the Article 263 (4) TFEU and in particular the requisite of ‘direct and individual concern’. Wrong qualification of facts.

Second ground of appeal: Error in law in interpreting the final limb of Article 263 (4) TFEU and the requisite and notion of regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures. Wrong qualification of facts and distortion of evidence.

Third ground of appeal: Wrong qualification of facts and distortion of evidence.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Wayne MAREADY.

No. 32A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Counsel, David Saacks, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Daniel R. Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Maready.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 654 S.E.2d 769.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 24th day of January 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: .

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."