# C_2023035EN.01008002.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/80

---

Action brought on 13 December 2022 — Cogebi and Cogebi v Council

(Case T-782/22)

(2023/C 35/101)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Cogebi (Brussels, Belgium), Cogebi, a.s. (Tábor, Czech Republic) (represented by: H. over de Linden, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul Article 3 (i) of the Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 (1), as amended by the Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1904 of 6 October 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (2), in so far it concerns inclusion in the list of goods and technology referred to in Article 3 (i) of the Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1904 (Annex XXI) of the CN code 6814; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 3 (i) of the Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 (1), as amended by the Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1904 of 6 October 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (2), in so far it concerns inclusion in the list of goods and technology referred to in Article 3 (i) of the Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1904 (Annex XXI) of the CN code 6814;

| — | order the Council bear the costs of this procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council bear the costs of this procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law alleging infringement of an essential procedural requirement -requirement to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law alleging infringement of an essential procedural requirement -requirement to state reasons.

| 2. | Second plea in law alleging manifest error of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law alleging manifest error of assessment.

| 3. | Third plea in law alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law alleging infringement of freedom to conduct a business, as referred to in Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law alleging infringement of freedom to conduct a business, as referred to in Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

| 5. | Fifth plea in law alleging infringement of the right to good administration, as referred to in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and infringement of the right of effective remedy and to a fair trial laid down in Article 47 of the Charter. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Fifth plea in law alleging infringement of the right to good administration, as referred to in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and infringement of the right of effective remedy and to a fair trial laid down in Article 47 of the Charter.

---

(1)  OJ 2014, L 229, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2022, L 259 I, p. 3.

---