alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN RE P.S.

No. COA08-540.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 7, 2008.

Certification Date October 27, 2008.

Appeal from Alexander (07JT8).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed; Remanded for correction of clerical error.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10360 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

PHILLIP SEAN ANTHONY, also known as Michael Hale, also known as Carlton Field , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11

- CR

- 74

- 1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Phillip Sean Anthony has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Anthony h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10360 Document: 00513804333 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016No. 16

- 10360

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Ac cordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-10360 Document: 00513804333 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
# C_2023235EN.01007101.xml

| 3.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/71

---

Action brought on 17 May 2023 — AirDoctor v EUIPO (AMAZING AIR)

(Case T-269/23)

(2023/C 235/84)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: AirDoctor LLC (Sherman Oaks, California, United States) (represented by: K. Rantala, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark AMAZING AIR — Application for registration No 18 716 085

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 March 2023 in Case R 2299/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN T-NETIX, INC.'S TRANSITION REPORT ON FORM 10Q-T FOR THE
FIVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   5-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                       950
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,568
<PP&E>                                          53,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,986
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,663
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,088
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,938)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,188)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,188)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          18,141
<SECURITIES>                                    18,317
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,851
<PP&E>                                           1,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,293
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,877
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,690)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,690)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.36)
        

</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 728/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 728/2014 of 30 June 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 728/2014                     

# of 30 June 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Tondi HOLT v. ALBEMARLE REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES BOARD, and Jerry L. Parks, in his official capacity as Health Director.

No. 78P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

John D. Leidy, Elizabeth City, for Holt.

Mary Nell Craven, Winston-Salem, for Health Services Board, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 655 S.E.2d 729.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of February 2008 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Community Investors Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB
for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                       /s/Robert W. Siegel
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Name: Robert W. Siegel
                                       Title: Vice President,
                                       Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 12, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Community Investors Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by
Community Investors Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
# C_2023261EN.01001601.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/16

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Bistriţa — Romania) — LO v Ministerul Public — Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria Bistriţa, RS, TU and VW

(Case C-56/23, (1) Riaman) (2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2023/C 261/23)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Judecătoria Bistriţa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LO

Interveners: Ministerul Public — Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria Bistriţa, RS, TU and VW

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Judecătoria Bistriţa (Court of First Instance, Bistriţa, Romania), by decision of 7 December 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  Date lodged: 3.2.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Lauren P. Silvernail, hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                       |  |                                                                  
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated November 3, 2010 |  | /s/ Lauren P. Silvernail                                         
|                       |  | Lauren P. Silvernail                                             
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate Development

This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
# C_2023063EN.01006001.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/60

---

Action brought on 19 December 2022 — PT v Commission

(Case T-788/22)

(2023/C 63/77)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: PT (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

Declare and adjudge that

| — | the European Commission is ordered to refund to the applicant the updated capital representing her pension rights that she transferred to the Pension Scheme of the European Union Institutions under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

the European Commission is ordered to refund to the applicant the updated capital representing her pension rights that she transferred to the Pension Scheme of the European Union Institutions under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | the European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

the European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law.

The applicant relies on unjust enrichment, in so far as she transferred her pension rights into the Pension Scheme of the European Union Institutions (‘PSEUI’), which gave rise to a ‘crediting’ of additional pensionable years recognised in the PSEUI. However, that ‘crediting’ did not give rise to any increase in the amount of pension paid to her under the fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’), the calculation of which is based exclusively on years of service (to the exclusion of additional pensionable years to be credited in respect of the transfer of pension rights).

The refusal to repay the pension rights transferred having no effect where the mechanism of the minimum subsistence figure referred to in the fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations applies, gives rise, according to the applicant, to the unjust enrichment of the European Union.

---
csgs-ex1025x_178.htm



Pages where confidential treatment has been requested are stamped “Confidential Treatment Requested and the Redacted Material has been separately filed with the Commission,” and places where information has been redacted have been marked with (***). 

Exhibit 10.25X

 

TWENTY-FIFTH AMENDMENT

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CSG MASTER SUBSCRIBER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CSG SYSTEMS, INC.

AND

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC

 

 

This Twenty-fifth Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made by and between CSG Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CSG”), and Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Customer”).  CSG and Customer entered into that certain Amended and Restated CSG Master Subscriber Management System Agreement dated February 9, 2009, as amended (the “Agreement”), and now desire to further amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.  If the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment shall be in conflict with the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control.  Any terms in initial capital letters or all capital letters used as a defined term but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.  Upon execution of this Amendment by the parties, any subsequent reference to the Agreement between the parties shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.  Except as amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect according to their terms. 

 

CSG and Customer agree to the following as of the Effective Date:

 

1.    Customer agrees to purchase an additional ****** (**) Vantage User IDs.  Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the Eighth Amendment to the Agreement dated January 5, 2010 (CSG document number 2301676), the number of Vantage User ID will be increased from *** ******* ********* (***) to *** ******* ************ (***).  

 

 

THIS AMENDMENT is executed on the day and year last signed below (the “Effective Date”).

 


		
	
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING 

COMPANY, LLC (“CUSTOMER”)

 

By: Charter Communications, Inc., its Manager
	
CSG SYSTEMS, INC. (“CSG”)

	
 

By: /s/ Joseph P. Murray
	
 

By:  /s/ Michael J. Henderson

	
 

Title:  VP Billing
	
 

Title:  EVP Sales & Marketing

	
 

Name:  Joseph P. Murray
	
 

Name:  Michael J. Henderson

	
 

Date:  3/12/12
	
 

Date:  3/14/12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         111,522
<SECURITIES>                                26,426,871
<RECEIVABLES>                                  728,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,270,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          715,533
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,555,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,270,680
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,380,021
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,318,278
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,318,278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,318,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,318,278
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
STATE v. PIGFORD.

No. COA08-109.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 19, 2008.

Certification Date September 8, 2008.

Appeal from Lenoir (05CRS816, 06CRS50869).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part; remanded for resentencing in part.
HERMAN v. HERMAN.

No. COA07-1081.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Catawba (05CVD2885).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.