alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. John Thomas JONES, III.

No. 532P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

John T. Jones, III, Pro Se.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 30th day of October 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Catawba *596County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."
#### Joann F. Huther, Formerly Known as Joann F. Chouinard, Appellant, v Kathryn Sickler et al., Respondents.

(Ap*1305peal No. 2.)

[801 NYS2d 198]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered March 11, 2004. The order, among other things, denied plaintiffs motion to set aside part of the jury verdict.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens,*155 AD2d 435 [1989]; *see also*CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

The Board of Directors
Logility, Inc.:

   We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-62531 and 333-66773) on Form S-8 of Logility, Inc. of our reports
dated June 14, 2001, relating to the combined balance sheets of Logility, Inc.
as of April 30, 2001, and 2000, and the related combined statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended April 30, 2001, and related schedule, which reports
appear in the April 30, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of Logility, Inc.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
July 24, 2001
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 63 – 1350, the Chief Operating Officer (PrincipalExecutive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer of Austins Steaks & Saloon,Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2003 and the financial statements contained therein, fully complywith the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q and the financialstatements thereto fairly present, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Robyn B. Mabe |   | May 15, 2003 |
|-------------------|--------|--------------|

 

----
# C_2023024EN.01005102.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/51

---

Action brought on 11 November 2022 — Kiana v Commission

(Case T-690/22)

(2023/C 24/69)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Kiana, Lda (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.

---
STATE v. Prentice Dale HUNTLEY.

No. 181P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of April 2007 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Forms S-8, No.  333-42422,  No. 333-89913,  No.  333-66767,  and No. 333-66769)
pertaining to the Tropical Sportswear Int'l Corporation 2000 Long-Term Incentive
Plan,  pertaining to the Tropical  Sportswear Int'l  Corporation  Employee Stock
Option Plan as Amended and Restated; pertaining to the Tropical Sportswear Int'l
Corporation  Non-Employee  Director  Stock Option Plan;  and  pertaining  to the
Apparel  International  Group,  Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, of our report dated
November 6, 2000,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of Tropical Sportswear Int'l Corporation  included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2000.



                                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Tampa, Florida
December 15, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3694 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3694

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act to limit obligations 
     to $350,000,000,000, absent majority approval by the Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2008

Mr. Sanders (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, and Mrs. Lincoln) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act to limit obligations 
     to $350,000,000,000, absent majority approval by the Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE.

    Section 115 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (Public Law 
110-343) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3)--
                    (A) by striking ``unless there is enacted, within 
                15 calendar days of'' and inserting ``until there is 
                enacted, not later than 15 calendar days after''; and
                    (B) by striking ``, effective upon the expiration 
                of such 15-day period,''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading, by striking 
                ``Disapproval'' and inserting ``Approval'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``disapproving'' 
                and inserting ``approving'';
                    (C) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking 
                ``disapproval'' and inserting ``approval''; and
                    (D) in paragraph (2)(D), by striking 
                ``disapproves'' and inserting ``approves''.
                                 <all>
```
Presidential Documents

51557 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 167 

Tuesday, August 30, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7918 of August 25, 2005 

Women’s Equality Day, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On August 26, 1920, the 19th Amendment to the Constitution was adopted, 

guaranteeing American women the right to vote. The passage of this amendment was the culmination of a long struggle that reached back to the founding 

of the country and was furthered by the 1848 women’s rights convention 

in Seneca Falls, New York. By celebrating Women’s Equality Day, we commemorate the adoption of this amendment and honor the visionary women 

who fought tirelessly for women’s suffrage. 

Led by women such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and 

Lucretia Mott, the suffragists stood up against injustice and persevered until, 

as Susan B. Anthony wrote, the handful who first took a stand for suffrage 

grew into an army. The efforts of these pioneers helped secure for American 

women the right to vote. 

Since the adoption of the 19th Amendment, women have continued to 

make great contributions to our Nation. Women today are leaders in medicine, 

law, journalism, business, government, and other professions. They are doctors and mothers, teachers and lawyers, homemakers and pilots, artists and 

entrepreneurs. Women also are serving with great honor in our Armed 

Forces as we fight a war on terror and defend our freedoms. The hard 

work of American women is essential to the strength and vitality of our 

country. 

One hundred and fifty-seven years after the Seneca Falls Convention, we 

continue to work so that all people can enjoy their God-given rights. This 

Women’s Equality Day, as we celebrate the 85th anniversary of the 19th 

Amendment, we honor the perseverance, leadership, and achievements of 

the suffragists and all of America’s women, and we renew our commitment 

to equal justice and dignity for all. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim August 26, 2005, as 

Women’s Equality Day. I call upon the people of the United States to 

observe this day with appropriate programs and activities. 

51558 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fifth 

day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–17389 

Filed 8–29–05; 9:07 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 1, 2005, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; University of Maryland University College, Adelphi, MD; and ANGEL Learning, Indianapolis, IN have been added as parties to this venture.                

Also, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA; Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, CA; Saba Software, Inc., Redwood Shores, CA; IVIMEDS Limited, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; SumTotal Systems, Inc., Bellevue, WA; and Thinq, Baltimore, MD have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 9, 2005. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 3, 2005 (70 FR 32653).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 05-16958  Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, John D. Reedy, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s firstfiscal quarter of 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 12, 2005
Exhibit 32










CERTIFICATION
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(UNITED
STATES CODE, TITLE 18, CHAPTER 63, SECTION 1350


ACCOMPANYING
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF


CENTERLINE
HOLDING COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008








In
connection with the Annual Report of Centerline Holding Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc D.
Schnitzer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Robert L. Levy, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:






(1)      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of our Company.










By:
            
            /s/ Marc D. Schnitzer
            
            By:
            
            /s/ Robert L. LevyMarc
      D. Schnitzer
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
              March
      2, 2010
            
            
            
            Robert
      L. Levy
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer and
              Principal
      Accounting Officer)
              March
      2, 2010






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN RE C.M.T.

No. COA07-1099.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from Alamance (01JT126).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed
In re Aaron T. Williams EL-BEY.

No. 150P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 11, 2007.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of March 2007 by Petitioner for Petition for Writ of Prohibition:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of April 2007."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 103/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 103/2014 of 4 February 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 103/2014                     

# of 4 February 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA06-109.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Davidson (04CRS52680, 04CRS52681).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2

---



RECKSON
ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.

Certification
of Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of
Reckson Associates Realty Corp.,Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|1) | The Quarterly
        Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September
        30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
    U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|2) | The information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                  
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

|                              |    |  |                                      
|----------------------------- | -- |  | -------------------------------------
|                              | By |  | /s/
 Michael Maturo                  
|                              |    |  |                                      
|                              |    |  | Michael Maturo,                      
|                              |    |  | Executive Vice President,            
|                              |    |  | Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
|                              |    |  |                                      
|Dated:
      November 7,
2005 |    |  |                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reckson Associates Realty Corp. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---