alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,352,693
<SECURITIES>                                24,312,531
<RECEIVABLES>                                  331,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,155,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          333,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,822,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,155,616
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               478,475
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                406,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                   406,266
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            406,266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   406,266
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
James T. BARNES, Jr., and Loris D. Hill v. Wyvonia B. DANCY.

No. 537P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Dal F. Wooten, Kinston, for Barnes and Hill.

Glen A. Barfield, Goldsboro, for Dancy.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of November 2007 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
HOSPICE AT GREENSBORO, INC. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIV. OF FACILITY SERVICES, LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION SECTION.

No. COA06-1641.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Dept. of Health & Human Services (05DHR1392).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
Opinion issued September 20, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00707-CV

———————————

JOEL D. MALLORY, Appellant

V.

J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE, L.L.C., 

AND CODILIS & STAWIARSKI, P.C., Appellees

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-64487

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Joel D. Mallory, has neither paid the required filing fee for this 

appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must 
2

pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by 

statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing 

indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 

51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of 

appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and 

the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. 

A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). On August 8, 2012, appellant was 

notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid by 

August 20, 2012. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, 

appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement 

of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for failure to pay the filing fee. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
EXHIBIT 32

 

 

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

                         ALL-AMERICAN SPORTPARK, INC.

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

 

     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of All-American SportPark, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010:

 

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of All-American SportPark, Inc. 

 

 

Dated:  May 17, 2010

 

 

 

/s/ Ronald S. Boreta

Ronald S. Boreta

Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive Officer) and

Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to All-American SportPark, Inc. and will be retained by All-American SportPark, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
J. B. WILLIAMS HOLDINGS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE-MONTH
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          16,953
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                       320
<INVENTORY>                                      3,424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,065
<PP&E>                                           1,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                     898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,244
<BONDS>                                         50,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,600
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,619
<SALES>                                         31,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,951
<CGS>                                            9,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,823
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,657
<INCOME-TAX>                                       680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                977
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       977
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.53


FIRST AMENDMENT TO 8% CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE NOTES












For good and valuable consideration CANNASYS, INC., a Nevada corporation, (the "Company"), and ADAR BAYS, LLC (the "Holder") hereby agree that those 8% Convertible Redeemable Notes issued from the Company to the Holder dated December 16, 2015 (a front end note and a back end note each in the amount of $35,000) (collectively, be referred to as the "Notes") shall be amended as follows:







1. Section 4(a) of each of the Notes shall have a Conversion Price ceiling of $0.00205 (in other words, the Holder shall not be subject to a Conversion Price greater than $.00205, regardless of the formula set forth in Section 4(a)).












All other terms of the Note not modified by the terms of this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to 8% Convertible Redeemable Notes has been executed effective July 12, 2016.







"Company":


CANNASYS, INC.












By: /s/ Michael A. Tew


Its: President


Print Name: Michael Tew












"Holder":


ADAR BAYS, LLC












By: /s/ Samuel Eisenberg


Its: Member


Print Name: Samuel Eisenberg
---

EXHIBIT 23.2




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-43248, 333-56122, 333-104725, 333-115039, 333-123587, 333-132792, 333-150481, 333-144782, and 333-157662 and Form S-3 Nos. 333-123586, 333-161608, and 333-163301) of Active Power, Inc., of our reports dated March 4, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Active Power, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Active Power, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/    Ernst & Young LLP




Austin, Texas


March 1, 2011
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Paladyne Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford A. Clark, VP
of Finance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Clifford A. Clark
---------------------
Clifford A. Clark
VP of Finance
December 16, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  
  
<ARTICLE> 5  
<LEGEND>  
This schedule contains summary financial information   
extracted from the   
Registrant's unaudited interim financial statements for the   
three months   
ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by   
reference   
to those financial statements.  
</LEGEND>  
<CIK> 0000930364  
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST IV  
         
<S>                                       <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997  
<CASH>                                      21,635,276  
<SECURITIES>                                 7,092,082<F1>  
<RECEIVABLES>                                  559,439  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0  
<INVENTORY>                                    383,810  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,064,532  
<PP&E>                                      12,855,525  
<DEPRECIATION>                                 477,203  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,619,044  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,467,620  
<BONDS>                                      5,310,498  
<COMMON>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,143,251  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,619,044  
<SALES>                                              0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,774,429  
<CGS>                                        1,188,235  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,188,235  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               409,609  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             167,450  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                356,220<F2> 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            356,220  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   356,220  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   747.11  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   747.11  
  
<FN>  
<F1>Investment in hydroelectric project partnership and corporation
accounted for on equity method in financial statements.  
<F2>After deduction of minority interest in Providence Project
earnings of $129,582.
</FN>  
          

</TABLE>
STATE v. EWELL.

No. COA06-1494.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Martin (03CRS1673, 03CRS1674, 03CRS1675, 03CRS1676).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
STATE v. HENGSTENBERG.

No. COA06-1661.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Buncombe (05CRS5973, 05CRS56485, 05CRS56486).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
STATE v. BLACKSTONE

No. COA07-473

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 19, 2008.

Certification Date March 10, 2008.

Appeal from Durham (06CRS40220).

Decision without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer MagroJennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and DirectorMarch 28, 2008Date


---
STATE v. Darrell Wayne MANESS.

No. 402A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 29, 2008.

Katherine Jane Allen, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Maness.

William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, Barry S. McNeill, Special Deputy Attorney General, Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*892The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of January 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Maness) shall have up to and including the 28th day of March 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of January 2008."
STATE v. HERRING.

No. COA07-1506.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 1, 2008.

Certification Date July 21, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (06CRS52651, 06CRS52652, 06CRS52653, 06CRS25722).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part; Vacated and remanded in part.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERALL-AMERICAN SPORTPARK, INC.PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of All-American SportPark, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2009:

(1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of All-American SportPark, Inc.

Dated:November 18, 2009

/s/ Ronald S. BoretaRonald S. BoretaChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) andPrincipal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to All-American SportPark, Inc. and will be retained by All -American SportPark, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TOYMAX
INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          21,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      675
<ALLOWANCES>                                       152
<INVENTORY>                                      5,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,836
<PP&E>                                           7,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,832
<SALES>                                         99,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,329
<CGS>                                           54,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   507
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,133
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,340
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. LEE.

No. COA07-541.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 5, 2008.

Certification Date February 25, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS53875).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
Lessie J. DUNN and Erwin W. Cook, Jr., individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated v. The STATE of North Carolina, The North Carolina Department of Revenue, and E. Norris Tolson, as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Revenue.

No. 605PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2007.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 179 N.C.App. 753, 635 S.E.2d 604 (2006), affirming an order certifying a class of taxpayers and appointing the named plaintiffs as class representatives entered 14 June 2005 by Judge Lindsay R. Davis, Jr. in Superior Court, Forsyth County. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 November 2007.

Smith, James, Rowlett & Cohen, LLP, by Norman B. Smith, Greensboro, and Futterman Howard Watkins Wylie & Ashley, Chtd., by John R. Wylie, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff-appellees.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Gregory P. Roney, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3485 

To require manufacturers to increase the percentage of automobiles manufactured for sale within the United States that are capable of operating 

on higher-level blends of renewable fuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, 

in combination with gasoline or diesel fuel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2008 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself and Mr. LUGAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To require manufacturers to increase the percentage of automobiles manufactured for sale within the United States 

that are capable of operating on higher-level blends of 

renewable fuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, in combination with gasoline or diesel fuel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENSURING THE AVAILABILITY OF DUAL 

4 FUELED AUTOMOBILES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 329 of title 49, United 

6 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 32902 

7 the following: 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 3485 IS

1 ‘‘§ 32902A. Requirement to manufacture dual fueled 

2 automobiles 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—For each model year listed in the 

4 following table, each manufacturer shall ensure that the 

5 percentage of automobiles manufactured by the manufac6 turer for sale in the United States that are dual fueled 

7 automobiles is not less than the percentage set forth for 

8 that model year in the following table: 

‘‘Model Year Percentage 

Model years 2011 and 2012 ....................... 50 percent 

Model year 2013 and each subsequent 

model year.

90 percent 

9 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

10 automobiles that operate only on electricity.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 for chapter 329 of title 49, United States Code, is amend13 ed by inserting after the item relating to section 32902 

14 the following: 

‘‘32902A. Requirement to manufacture dual fueled automobiles.’’. 

15 (c) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 1 year after the 

16 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Trans17 portation shall prescribe regulations to carry out the 

18 amendments made by this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
PATTERSON v. SANDERS UTILITY CONST.

No. COA07-436

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 19, 2008.

Certification Date March 10, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. 415880).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.