alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023155EN.01003701.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/37

---

Appeal brought on 20 February 2023 by PNB Banka AS against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 7 December 2022 in Case T-301/19, PNB Banka v ECB

(Case C-100/23 P)

(2023/C 155/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: PNB Banka AS (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (ECB)

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal;

| — | declare void the decision of the ECB, notified by letter of 1 March 2019, to classify the appellant as a significant entity subject to its direct prudential supervision; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare void the decision of the ECB, notified by letter of 1 March 2019, to classify the appellant as a significant entity subject to its direct prudential supervision;

| — | order the ECB to pay the appellant's costs and the costs of this appeal, and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the ECB to pay the appellant's costs and the costs of this appeal, and

| — | to the extent that the Court of Justice is not in a position to rule on the substance, refer the case back to the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

to the extent that the Court of Justice is not in a position to rule on the substance, refer the case back to the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on a single plea in law alleging that the judgement under appeal is procedurally flawed because the General Court did not deal appropriately with the issue of the representation of the appellant in the context of the procedure in front of the General Court.

The General Court erred when it assumed that an issue with respect to the integrity of the procedure in front of the General Court is not a problem as long as it can be argued that the problem would not exist if, hypothetically, Latvia complied with its obligations. It thereby violated the principle that legal protection must not be merely theoretical and illusory and thereby violated Article 47 of the Charter.

---
51412 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices 

Dated: August 25, 2005. 

Mark S. Kaizen, 

Designated Federal Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05–17302 Filed 8–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4811–33–U 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Public Meeting of the President’s 

Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform 

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: This notice advises all 

interested persons of a public meeting of 

the President’s Advisory Panel on 

Federal Tax Reform. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

Thursday, September 15, 2005, and will 

begin at 10 a.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the Ronald Reagan Building & 

International Trade Center 

Amphitheater, Concourse Level, 1300 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20004. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Panel staff at (202) 927–2TAX (927–

2829) (not a toll-free call) or e-mail 

info@taxreformpanel.gov (please do not 

send comments to this box). Additional 

information is available at http:// 

www.taxreformpanel.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose: The September 15 meeting is 

the twelfth meeting of the Advisory 

Panel. At this meeting, the Panel will 

continue to discuss issues associated 

with reform of the tax code. 

Comments: Interested parties are 

invited to attend the meeting; however, 

no public comments will be heard at the 

meeting. Any written comments with 

respect to this meeting may be mailed 

to The President’s Advisory Panel on 

Federal Tax Reform,1440 New York 

Avenue NW., Suite 2100, Washington, 

DC 20220. All written comments will be 

made available to the public. 

Records: Records are being kept of 

Advisory Panel proceedings and will be 

available at the Internal Revenue 

Service’s FOIA Reading Room at 1111 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 1621, 

Washington, DC 20024. The Reading 

Room is open to the public from 9 a.m. 

to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday 

except holidays. The public entrance to 

the reading room is on Pennsylvania 

Avenue between 10th and 12th Streets. 

The phone number is (202) 622–5164 

(not a toll-free number). Advisory Panel 

documents, including meeting 

announcements, agendas, and minutes, 

will also be available on http:// 

www.taxreformpanel.gov. 

Dated: August 25, 2005. 

Mark S. Kaizen, 

Designated Federal Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05–17303 Filed 8–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4811–33–U
# The Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2014 No. 11

Food

# The Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (revoked)F1

Made

20th January 2014

Coming into operation

28th February 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (22.2.2020) by The Food Safety (Information and Compositional Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2020 (S.R. 2020/16), reg. 1, **Sch. 2** (with reg. 7)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3544 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3544

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the financing of 
                             the Superfund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 23 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

Mrs. Clinton (for herself, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Cardin, Mr. 
   Obama, Mr. Biden, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Dodd) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the financing of 
                             the Superfund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Superfund Polluter Pays Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUPERFUND TAXES.

    (a) Excise Taxes.--Section 4611(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Application of Hazardous Substance Superfund Financing 
Rate.--The Hazardous Substance Superfund financing rate under this 
section shall apply after December 31, 1986, and before January 1, 
1996, and after the date of the enactment of this subsection and before 
January 1, 2017.''.
    (b) Corporate Environmental Income Tax.--Section 59A(e) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Application of Tax.--The tax imposed by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986, and before 
January 1, 1996, and to taxable years beginning after the date of the 
enactment of this subsection and before January 1, 2017.''.
    (c) Technical Amendments.--
            (1) Section 4611(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking ``or exported from'' in paragraph 
                (1)(A),
                    (B) by striking ``or exportation'' in paragraph 
                (1)(B), and
                    (C) by striking ``and Exportation'' in the heading.
            (2) Section 4611(d)(3) of such Code is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``or exporting the crude oil, as 
                the case may be'' in the text and inserting ``the crude 
                oil'', and
                    (B) by striking ``or exports'' in the heading.
    (d) Effective Dates.--
            (1) Excise taxes.--The amendments made by subsections (a) 
        and (c) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 
        Act.
            (2) Income tax.--The amendment made by subsection (b) shall 
        apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. William Joseph MOORE.

No. 460A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 14, 2008.

Marilyn G. Ozer, William F.W. Massengale, Chapel Hill, for Moore.

Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of January 2008 by the State of NC for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. State of NC shall have up to and including the 13th day of February 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of January 2008."
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Allergy Research Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dr. Stephen A. Levine, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated:  April 6, 2006



                             By:  /s/  Stephen A. Levine
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                             Dr. Stephen A. Levine
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Allergy Research Group, Inc. and
will be retained by Allergy Research Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 247/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 247/2014 of 13 March 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 247/2014                     

# of 13 March 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 March 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. CARNEY.

No. COA07-1078.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Pitt (03CRS65084, 03CRS65086).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
In the Matter of J.G., (a.k.a J.M.G. and J.M.S.) appealed by Guilford County DSS.

No. 586P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

James A. Dickens, for Guilford County DSS.

Lewis Pitts, for Juvenile.

Margaret S. Rowlett, Greensboro, for Guardian ad Litem.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ____, 652 S.E.2d 266.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of December 2007 by Petitioner (Guilford County DSS) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 39/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 39/2014 of 16 January 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 39/2014                     

# of 16 January 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 January 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Independent Accountants' Report



Board of Directors
Community Investors Bancorp, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated statements of financial
condition, earnings, comprehensive income, and cash flows of Community Investors
Bancorp, Inc. as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and for the three-month periods
then ended. The financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's
management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated statement of
financial condition as of June 30, 2001, and the related consolidated statements
of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented herein) and in our report dated August 16, 2001, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion,
the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated statement of
financial condition as of June 30, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of financial condition from
which it has been derived.


/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP



Cincinnati, Ohio
November 2, 2001
Exhibit 32

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Frankfort First Bancorp, Inc. (the “small business issuer”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                               |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all   material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the   small business issuer as of and for the period covered by the Report. |

 

|                      | /s/ DON D JENNINGS                         |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                            |
|                      | Don Jennings                               |
|                      | President and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                      |                                       |
|                      | /s/ R. CLAY HULETTE                        |
|                      |                                            |
|                      | R. Clay Hulette                            |
|                      | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                      |                                       |
| Date:   February 11, 2005 |                                       |
# C_2023015EN.01004501.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/45

---

Action brought on 11 November 2022 — Portal Golf Gestión v EUIPO — Augusta National (imaster.golf)

(Case T-677/22)

(2023/C 15/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Portal Golf Gestión, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Garrido Pastor, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Augusta National, Inc. (Augusta, Georgia, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark imaster.golf — Application for registration No 17 995 602

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 August 2022 in Case R 2204/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | allow the registration of the mark applied for in respect of all the goods and services covered; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the registration of the mark applied for in respect of all the goods and services covered;

| — | change the decisions on costs issued by the Opposition Division and the Appeal Division ordering to pay costs to the other side; |
| --- | --- |

—

change the decisions on costs issued by the Opposition Division and the Appeal Division ordering to pay costs to the other side;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---