## NO. 12-08-00318-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTRICT

TYLER, TEX AS

JESS IE J AMES JAC KSO N, § APP EAL FRO

M T HE 2 41 ST APPELLANT V . § JUDICIAL DISTRI CT COURT OF TH E ST ATE OF TEX AS, APP ELL EE § SMI TH CO UN TY, T EXAS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM J essie James J ackson a

ppeals his conviction for co n s pirac y to commit capital murder. Appellant’s c ounsel has filed a brief a sserting compliance with Ande rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct . 1396, 18 L . Ed. 2d 493 (1967) a nd Ga ino us v

. St ate , 436 S.W

. 2 d 1 3 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). We dismiss Appellant’s appea l.

B ACKG ROUND Appellant wa s char g ed by indictment w ith c onspiracy to c ommit capital murder. Appe llant p l ea d edgu i l t y

wi t h o u ta p l eaagr ee m en t , an d t h e t ri al co u rt fo u n d

h i m gu i l t y . Fo l l o wi n g a h ea ri n g, the trial cour

t assessed punishment at imprisonment for f orty y ear s. This appea l followed.

A N A LY SI S P URS UANT T O A N D ER S V . C A L IFO R N IA Appellant’s c ounsel has filed a b r ie f in c o mpliance with Ande rs and Ga ino us . Counsel states that he has diligently revie wed the appellate rec ord and that he is w ell acqua inted with the fac ts of this case. In compliance with Ande rs , G a ino us , and Hig

h v . St ate , 5 73 S.W. 2d

80 7 ( Te x. Cr im. App. 1978), c ounsel’s brief prese nts a thorough chronolog ical sum mary of t he procedura l history of the ca se and f

urther states that counsel is unable to present a ny arguable issues for appeal. We have2

consider ed co u n s el ’s brief and have conducte d our own indepe ndent re view of the rec ord. See Ande rs , 3 86 U. S. at 74 5, 87 S. Ct . at 14 00 ; see also Pe nso n v . O hio , 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S. Ct . 346, 350, 102 L . Ed. 2d 300 (1988). We have found no r ever sible err or. See Bled so ev . St ate , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
C ONCL US I ON As require d, Appellant’s counsel has m oved for leave to withdraw. See In re Schu lm an , 252 S.W .3d 403, 407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig . proce eding ); Sta ff ord v . St ate , 813 S.W .2d 503, 511 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 91 ). We are in a g re e me nt wi th Ap pe lla nt’ s c ouns e l that thi s a

pp e a l is wh oll y f r i v o l o u s . A c c o r d i n g l y, h i s m o t i o nf o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r aw i s h e r e b y granted , and we dis miss thi s appea l. See In re Schu lm an , 252 S.W .3d at 408–09 (“A fter the completion of t hese four st eps, the
c ourt of a pp e a ls wi ll e ith e r a g re e that the a pp e a l is wh oll y fr ivo lou s, g ra nt the a tto rn e y ’s mot ion

to withdraw, a

nd dismiss the appe al, or it will determine that ther e may be p lausible g rounds for appea l.”). Counsel has a duty , within five day s of t he date of t his opinion, t o send a c opy of the opinion and judg ment to Appellant and a dvise him of his r ight to f ile a petition for discr etionary revie w. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 8. 4; In re Schu lm an , 252 S.W .3d at 411 n.35. Should Appellant wish to seek further revie w of this case by

the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either reta in a n attorney to file a pe tition for discretionar y revie w or he mus t file a pro se pe tition for discretionar y revie w. See In re Schu lm an , 252 S.W .3d at 408 n.22. Any petition for discre tionary revie w must be filed within thirty day s following the date of this opinion or the date the last timely motion for rehe aring is ove rruled by this court. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 68.2. Any petition for discre tionary revie w must be filed with this court, afte r which it will be forwar ded to the Tex as C ourt of C riminal Appea ls along with the rest of the filings in this case

. See T EX . R. A PP . P

. 6 8

. 3

. Any petition for discre tionary revie w should comply

with the require ments of Rule 68.4 of the Te x as Rules of Appe llate Proce dure. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 6 8. 4; In re Schu lm an , 252 S.W .3d at 408 n.22. Opinion delivere d J uly

31, 2009. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.
(DO N OT PUBL I SH)