Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 174 / Friday, September 9, 2005 / Notices 53689 

by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to 

the reviews. A party granted access to 

BPI following publication of the 

Commission’s notice of institution of 

the reviews need not reapply for such 

access. A separate service list will be 

maintained by the Secretary for those 

parties authorized to receive BPI under 

the APO. 

Staff report. The prehearing staff 

report in the reviews will be placed in 

the nonpublic record on December 20, 

2005, and a public version will be 

issued thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.64 of the Commission’s rules. 

Hearing. The Commission will hold a 

hearing in connection with these 

reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on 

January 24, 2006, at the U.S. 

International Trade Commission 

Building. Requests to appear at the 

hearing should be filed in writing with 

the Secretary to the Commission on or 

before January 11, 2006. A nonparty 

who has testimony that may aid the 

Commission’s deliberations may request 

permission to present a short statement 

at the hearing. All parties and 

nonparties desiring to appear at the 

hearing and make oral presentations 

should attend a prehearing conference 

to be held at 9:30 a.m. on January 18, 

2006, at the U.S. International Trade 

Commission Building. Oral testimony 

and written materials to be submitted at 

the public hearing are governed by 

sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, 

and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules. 

Parties must submit any request to 

present a portion of their hearing 

testimony in camera no later than 7 

business days prior to the date of the 

hearing. 

Written submissions. Each party to the 

reviews may submit a prehearing brief 

to the Commission. Prehearing briefs 

must conform with the provisions of 

section 207.65 of the Commission’s 

rules; the deadline for filing is January 

12, 2006. Parties may also file written 

testimony in connection with their 

presentation at the hearing, as provided 

in section 207.24 of the Commission’s 

rules, and posthearing briefs, which 

must conform with the provisions of 

section 207.67 of the Commission’s 

rules. The deadline for filing 

posthearing briefs is February 2, 2006; 

witness testimony must be filed no later 

than three days before the hearing. In 

addition, any person who has not 

entered an appearance as a party to the 

reviews may submit a written statement 

of information pertinent to the subject of 

the reviews on or before February 2, 

2006. On February 23, 2006, the 

Commission will make available to 

parties all information on which they 

have not had an opportunity to 

comment. Parties may submit final 

comments on this information on or 

before February 27, 2006, but such final 

comments must not contain new factual 

information and must otherwise comply 

with section 207.68 of the Commission’s 

rules. All written submissions must 

conform with the provisions of section 

201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any 

submissions that contain BPI must also 

conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

rules do not authorize filing of 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means, except to 

the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 

FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even 

where electronic filing of a document is 

permitted, certain documents must also 

be filed in paper form, as specified in II 

(C) of the Commission’s Handbook on 

Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 

68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). 

Additional written submissions to the 

Commission, including requests 

pursuant to section 201.12 of the 

Commission’s rules, shall not be 

accepted unless good cause is shown for 

accepting such submissions, or unless 

the submission is pursuant to a specific 

request by a Commissioner or 

Commission staff. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

reviews must be served on all other 

parties to the reviews (as identified by 

either the public or BPI service list), and 

a certificate of service must be timely 

filed. The Secretary will not accept a 

document for filing without a certificate 

of service. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Issued: September 2, 2005. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–17884 Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent 

Decree 

In accordance with Departmental 

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that a proposed consent decree in 

United States v. Congaree Downs 

Limited Partnership, et al., Case No. 

3:05–cv–02505, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

District of South Carolina on August 30, 

2005. This proposed Consent Decree 

concerns a complaint filed by the 

United States against the Defendants 

pursuant to Section 301(a) of the Clean 

Water Act (‘‘CWA’’), 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), 

to obtain injunctive relief from and 

impose civil penalties against the 

Defendants for filling wetlands without 

a permit. 

The proposed Consent Decree 

requires the defendants to pay a civil 

penalty and restore the impacted 

wetland to its natural grade contour. 

The Department of Justice will accept 

written comments relating to this 

proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) 

days from the date of publication of this 

notice. Please address comments to 

Emery Clark, Assistant United States 

Attorney, United States Attorney’s 

Office, Wachovia Building, Suite 500, 

1441 Main Street, Columbia, South 

Carolina 29201 and refer to United 

States v. Congaree Downs Limited 

Partnership, et al., Case No. 3:05–cv–

02505. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Clerk’s Office, United 

States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, 901 Richland Lane, 

Columbia, South Carolina. 

In addition, the proposed Consent 

Decree may be viewed on the World 

Wide Web at http://www.usdoj.gov/ 

enrd/open.html. 

Stephen Samuels, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 05–17848 Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Revised Consent 

Decree Under the Clean Air Act 

Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that on August 31, 2005, a First 

Revised Consent Decree in the matter of 

United States, et al. v. Marathon 

Ashland Petroleum LLC, Civil Action 

No. 4:01–CV–40119–PVG, was lodged 

with the United States District Court for 

the Eastern District of Michigan. 

The First Revised Consent Decree 

supercedes a Consent Decree entered in 

the above-referenced action in August of 

2001 (‘‘August 2001 Consent Decree’’) 

among the United States, as Plaintiff, 

the County of Wayne, the State of 

Louisiana, and the State of Minnesota, 

as Plaintiff-Intervenors, and Marathon 

Ashland Petroleum LLC (‘‘MAP’’), as 

Defendant. In the August 2001 Consent 

Decree, MAP agreed to undertake, inter 

53690 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 174 / Friday, September 9, 2005 / Notices 

alia, numerous projects to reduce 

emissions of air pollutants at seven 

refineries that MAP owns and operates. 

The proposed First Revised Consent 

Decree includes numerous changes, 

including substituting some of the 

original control technologies that 

proved ineffective or potentially unsafe 

for alternative, proven technologies, 

extending some compliance deadlines 

while accelerating others, incorporating 

some new final emissions limits, and 

modifying provisions relating to 

reporting, recordkeeping, modification, 

and termination. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the First Revised Consent 

Decree. Comments should be addressed 

to the Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States, et al. v. Marathon Ashland 

Petroleum LLC, D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–

07247. 

The First Revised Consent Decree may 

be examined at the Office of the United 

States Attorney, 211 W. Fort St., Suite 

2300, Detroit, Michigan 48226, and at 

U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 W. Jackson St., 

Chicago, IL 60604. During the public 

comment period, the First Revised 

Consent Decree may also be examined 

on the following Department of Justice 

Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

open.html. A copy of the First Revised 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax number (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $59.50 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury. 

William D. Brighton, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 05–17849 Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on August 

19, 2005, a proposed consent decree was 

lodged in United States v. Reichhold 

Limited, et al., No. 5:03–CV–0077–

3(CAR) (M.D. Ga.). The consent decree 

settles the United States’ claims against 

the Estate of Thomas W. Cleveland and 

Jacqueline Woolfork Mathes as well as 

‘‘Woolfolk Settlement Agreement 

Parties’’ [Woolfolk Chemical Works, 

Ltd; The J.W. Woolfolk Trust; John W. 

Moye, Thomas W. Cleveland, Jr., James 

Teabo, and Rachel Mathes, individually, 

and in their capacity as former or 

current Co-Trustees of the J.W. Woolfolk 

Trust; The Elizabeth Woolfolk Moye 

Trust; John W. Moye, as Trustee of the 

Elizabeth Woolfolk Moye Trust; The 

Anita Woolfolk Cleveland Trust; 

Thomas W. Cleveland, Jr. and James 

Teabo, as former or current Trustees of 

The Anita Woolfolk Cleveland Trust; 

The Jacqueline Woolfolk Mathes Trust; 

and Rachel Mathes, as Trustee of The 

Jacqueline Woolfolk Mathes Trust] and 

the ‘‘Woolfolk Parties’’ [John H. 

Thurman; Elizabeth Cleveland Martin; 

Margie Cleveland Hoots; Anita 

Beauregard Cleveland; Blake Hansford 

Cleveland; Letitia M. Unver; Julia M. 

Poppell; Ann Cleveland Hoots; Deborah 

Cleveland; John C. Alden; Emma D. 

Alden; Thomas Alden; David Victor 

Hewes, Betty L. Hewes; Hope Hewes 

Robinson; Pamela Hewes Jones; James 

C. Liipfert, Jr.; Lucile B. Dudley; Richard 

B. Liipfert; Jeptha B. Liipfert; Susan A. 

Thurman; Mary Anne Thurman; Martha 

Kay Thurman; Thomas David Thurman; 

and Josephine Kujawinski] under 

Section 107 the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 

U.S.C. 9607, in connection with the 

Woolfolk Chemical Superfund Site in 

Fort Valley, Georgia (the ‘‘Site’’). 

Under the proposed consent decree 

the United States will participate in 

recovery against Continental Insurance 

Company (‘‘Continental’’) from a 

lawsuit against Continental to obtain 

insurance coverage brought by the 

Woolfolk Settlement Agreement Parties 

relating to the site. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the consent decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Reichhold Limited, et al., No. 

5:03–CV–0077–3(CAR) (M.D. Ga.) and 

DOJ #90–11–3–07282. 

The consent decree may be examined 

at the Office of the United States 

Attorney for the Middle District of 

Georgia, 433 Cherry St., Macon, Georgia 

31202. During the public comment 

period, the consent decree may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A copy 

of the consent decree may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC. 

20044–7611, or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood, 

tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov, Fax No. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$8.75 (25 cents per page reproduction 

cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury. 

Ellen M. Mahan, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 05–17850 Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Submission for OMB Emergency 

Review—Comment Request 

September 5, 2005. 

The Department of Labor (DOL) has 

submitted the following (see below) 

information collection request (ICR), 

utilizing emergency review procedures, 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and clearance in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 

44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). OMB approval 

has been requested by September 16, 

2005. A copy of this ICR, with 

applicable supporting documentation, 

may be obtained by calling the DOL 

Departmental Clearance Officer, Ira 

Mills, on (202) 693–4122 (this is not a 

toll-free number) or e-mail: 

mills.ira@dol.gov. 

Comments and questions about the 

ICR listed below should be submitted to 

the Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs (OIRA), Attn.: OMB Desk Officer 

for the Employment and Training 

Administration, Office of Management 

and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, 

DC 20503 (202) 395–7316 (this is not a 

toll-free number) before September 16, 

2005. 

The Office of Management and Budget 

is particularly interested in comments 

which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including