alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3685 

To prohibit the selling and counterfeiting of tickets for a Presidential 

inaugural ceremony. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To prohibit the selling and counterfeiting of tickets for a 

Presidential inaugural ceremony. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON SALE AND COUNTERFEITING 

4 OF INAUGURAL TICKETS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for any per6 son to— 

7 (1) except as provided in subsection (b), know8 ingly and intentionally sell, facilitate the sale of, or 

9 transfer for money or property, or attempt to sell, 


jbell on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3685 IS

1 facilitate the sale of, or transfer for money or prop2 erty, a ticket to a Presidential inaugural ceremony; 

3 (2) with the intent to defraud, falsely make, 

4 forge, counterfeit, or falsely alter a ticket to a Presi5 dential inaugural ceremony; or 

6 (3) with the intent to defraud, use, unlawfully 

7 possess, or exhibit a ticket to a Presidential inau8 gural ceremony, knowing the ticket to be falsely 

9 made, forged, counterfeited, or falsely altered. 

10 (b) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply to the 

11 sale, facilitation of the sale of, or transfer for money or 

12 property, or attempted sale, facilitation of the sale of, or 

13 transfer for money or property, of a ticket to a Presi14 dential inaugural ceremony that occurs after the date on 

15 which the Presidential inaugural ceremony for which the 

16 ticket was issued occurs. 

17 (c) PENALTY.—Whoever violates subsection (a) shall 

18 be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned 

19 not more than 1 year, or both. 

20 (d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Presi21 dential inaugural ceremony’’ means a public inaugural 

22 ceremony at which the President elect or the Vice Presi23 dent elect take the oath or affirmation of office for the 


jbell on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•S 3685 IS

1 office of President of the United States or the office of 

2 Vice President of the United States, respectively. 

Æ 


jbell on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold a meeting on August 30, 2005, 9:30 a.m., at the Board's meeting room on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

(1) IDMS to DB2 Conversion

(2) Discussion on Field Service Hiring

(3) Decision on Reconsideration—DisAbility ReDesign, Inc.

The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

Dated: August 18, 2005.

Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 05-16893  Filed 8-22-05; 9:51 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned,
Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General
Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | May 9, 2008            



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | May 9, 2008
STATE of North Carolina v. Steven Orlando McINTOSH.

No. 498P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Kevin P. Bradley, Durham, for McIntosh.

Jason T. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of October 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
STATE v. Darrell Wayne MANESS.

No. 402A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 3, 2007.

Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of July 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Serve Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 30th day of July 2007 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then *436proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of July 2007."
88 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

General Electric $1.1 B

CFM International $410.6 M

Battelle Memorial Institute $192.0 M

L3 Technologies $189.0 M

Wornick $162.6 M

Continental AG $122.3 M

Boeing $109.0 M

University of Dayton $106.5 M

United Technologies $102.7 M

Alion Science and Technology $96.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

OHIO

#19 #32 1.9% $819 #18 #11 #12

$9.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.4% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $6.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

61,278 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

61,278

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Greene 5,344 13,849 104 2,548 21,845

Franklin 432 7,106 3,683 2,910 14,131

Cuyahoga 203 2,803 429 219 3,654

Hamilton 131 270 733 984 2,118

Trumbull 35 61 379 1,524 1,999

Clark ND 392 1,565 ND

Richland ND 309 1,532 74

Stark 38 20 997 847 1,902

Summit ND 158 506 835

Fulton ND ND 1,047 ND

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 15%

Service: 29%

Supplies and

Equipment: 54%

Active Duty: 11%

Civilian: 43%

National 

Guard: 27%

Reserve: 18%

13%

15%

47%

25%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

32%

5%

48%

16%

$5.0 $5.5

$4.3

$5.0

$3.7 $4.4 $5.0

$6.4

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 89

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Cuyahoga

Summit

Licking

Miami

Franklin

Montgomery

Butler

Clermont

FISCAL YEAR 2018 OHIO

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Greene

Hamilton

Montgomery

Butler

Franklin

Cuyahoga

Summit

Clermont

Licking

Miami

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.8 B

$1.4 B

$718.1 M

$514.3 M

$510.2 M

$257.8 M

$197.1 M

$153.5 M

$136.8 M

$90.9 M

Greene

Franklin

Cuyahoga

Hamilton

Clark

Richland

Trumbull

Lucas

Summit

Fulton

$1.7 B

$714.5 M

$200.8 M

$62.3 M

$61.3 M

$43.1 M

$41.4 M

$35.1 M

$33.1 M

$28.2 M

Lucas

Fulton

Cuyahoga

Trumbull

Richland

Clark

Greene

Hamilton

Hamilton

Greene

Franklin

Summit
EXHIBIT 99.1


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, David Calkins,  the Chief Executive  Officer of Pacel Corp. (the  "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the  Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 13, 2003


/s/David Calkins, CEO and CFO
David Calkins, CEO and CFO
EXHIBIT 11

                        INTELLIGENT MEDICAL IMAGING, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

                                                   THREE MONTHS    THREE MONTHS
                                                       ENDED           ENDED
                                                     MARCH 31,       MARCH 31,
                                                       1997            1996
                                                 -------------------------------

Net income (loss)                                  ($1,478,503)        $144,117

Weighted average common shares outstanding           10,902,766       7,313,380

Shares related to Staff Accounting Bulletin 83:
     Stock options and warrants granted
     Issuance of common stock                                         1,918,526
                                                 -------------------------------
Average common shares, outstanding                   10,902,766       9,231,906
                                                 ===============================

Net income (loss) per common share                      ($0.13)           $0.02
                                                 ===============================
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600390

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

ERICK MARROQUIN

Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major Michael D. Libretto, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 2d Tank Battalion, 2d 

Marine Division, Camp Lejeune, NC.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Major Winston G. McMillan, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 2 May 2017

_________________________

Before MARKS, FULTON, and PETTIT, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1122/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1122/2014 of 20 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for white marlin in the Atlantic            Ocean by vessels flying the flag of Spain         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1122/2014                     

# of 20 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for white marlin in the Atlantic Ocean by vessels flying the flag of Spain

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Covad Communications Group,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Charles E. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                            COVAD COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.

                            By:            /s/ CHARLES E. HOFFMAN
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                             Charles E. Hoffman
                                President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Date: February 27, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         254,625
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               468,147
<PP&E>                                      11,041,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,751,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          307,380
<BONDS>                                      4,284,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,159,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,751,672
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               769,863
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               456,585
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             157,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 16,640
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   139,482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned,
Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General
Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | May 9, 2008            



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | May 9, 2008
# Council Decision of 6 May 2014 amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national central banks,            as regards the external auditors of the Banque centrale du Luxembourg (2014/275/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 6 May 2014

# amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national central banks, as regards the external auditors                        of the Banque centrale du Luxembourg                     

# (2014/275/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Protocol No 4 on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank annexed                           to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular to Article 27.1                           thereof,                        

Having regard to Recommendation ECB/2013/51 of the European Central Bank of 17 December 2013 to the Council of the European                           Union on the external auditors of the Banque centrale du Luxembourg(1),                        

Whereas:

(1)The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and of the national central banks of the Eurosystem are to be audited by independent                              external auditors recommended by the Governing Council of the ECB and approved by the Council of the European Union.

(2)The mandate of the current external auditors of the Banque centrale du Luxembourg expired after the audit for the financial                              year 2013. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors for the financial years 2014 to 2018.

(3)The Banque centrale du Luxembourg has selected DELOITTE AUDIT SARL as its external auditors for the financial years 2014 to                              2018.

(4)It is appropriate to follow the recommendation of the Governing Council of the ECB and to amend Council Decision 1999/70/EC(2) accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Article 1(7) of Decision 1999/70/EC is replaced by the following:

‘7.DELOITTE AUDIT SARL are hereby approved as the external auditors of the Banque centrale du Luxembourg for the financial years                           2014 to 2018’.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its notification.

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision is addressed to the European Central Bank.

Done at Brussels, 6 May 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

G. Stournaras                            

1

OJ C 378, 24.12.2013, p. 15.                           

2

Council Decision 1999/70/EC of 25 January 1999 concerning the external auditors of the national central banks (OJ L 22, 29.1.1999, p. 69).