alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1181/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1181/2014 of 30 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in Union            waters of VIa, VIb, VIIa-c and VIIe-k by vessels flying the flag of Belgium         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1181/2014                     

# of 30 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in Union waters of VIa, VIb, VIIa-c and VIIe-k by vessels flying                        the flag of Belgium                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1000
       
<S>                                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                 DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                             1,152
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      5,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          92
<INVENTORY>                                                       12,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  20,865
<PP&E>                                                            15,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    37,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              4,086
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                          840
<COMMON>                                                           3,192
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (792)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      37,366
<SALES>                                                           31,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  31,873
<CGS>                                                             23,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     28,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 1,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    1,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         752
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  829
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     (448)
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0
        




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 19 (Monday, January 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 4913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1742]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4981]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Fra Angelico''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Fra Angelico,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owners. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 
New York, NY from on or about October 25, 2005 to on or about January 
29, 2006, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered 
to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, (telephone: 
202/453-8048). The address is Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: January 25, 2005.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-1742 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3607 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3607

         To reauthorize the memorial to Martin Luther King, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 26 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

Mr. Burr (for himself, Mr. McCain, Mr. Brown, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
  Kennedy, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Warner, Mr. Voinovich, and Mr. 
  Chambliss) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reauthorize the memorial to Martin Luther King, Jr.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Martin Luther King, Jr., Memorial 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF MEMORIAL TO MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.

    Section 508(b)(2) of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management 
Act of 1996 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note; 110 Stat. 4157, 114 Stat. 26, 117 
Stat. 1347, 119 Stat. 527) is amended by striking ``November 12, 2008'' 
and inserting ``November 12, 2009''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Paul FITZPATRICK.

No. 143P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Kenneth P. Fitzpatrick, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 2nd day of April 2008 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Chatham County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53237-53238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1602-DR]


Florida; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-1602-DR), dated August 28, 2005, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 30, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of August 28, 2005:

    Monroe County for Public Assistance.
    Broward and Miami-Dade Counties for Public Assistance 
[Categories C-G] (already designated for Public Assistance 
[Categories A and B], including direct Federal assistance. For a 
period of up to 72 hours, assistance for emergency protective 
measures, including direct Federal assistance, will be provided at 
100 percent of the total eligible costs. The period of up to 72 
hours at 100 percent excludes debris removal.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public

[[Page 53238]]

Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-17696 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
EXHIBIT 99.2


                         RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Scott H. Rechler, CO-CEO of Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (the "Company"),
certify pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

         1)     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
                complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and

         2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2002


                        By           /s/ Scott H.Rechler
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                     Scott H.Rechler, Co-Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. ARAZIE.

No. COA08-166.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 19, 2008.

Certification Date September 8, 2008.

Appeal from Stanly (06CRS53456).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C ARLOS GAR C IA, Pe titioner - Appe lla nt, v. R ON E. B AR

N ES, W arde n , R

e sponde nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-16479

D.C . No. 3:12-c v-01760-EM C M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Edwa rd M . C he n, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d August 13, 2014 ** B e fore : SC HR O EDER , THOM AS, and HUR W ITZ, C i rc uit Judge s . Form e r C a lifornia

sta te prisone r C arlos Ga

rc ia a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt de ny i ng his 28 U.S.C . § 2254 ha be a s pe tition. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 2253. W e re vie w the distric t c ourt’ s de c i sion to de ny Ga rc ia ’ s ha be a s pe tition denovo, se eN e v a re z v . Barne

s , 749 F.3d 1124, 1127 

# FIL ED AUG 18 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).(9th C ir. 2014) (pe r c uriam ), and we a ffirm .

In Ja nua ry 2010, whileGa

rc ia wa s still inc a

rc e rate d, C a lifornia

Pe na l C ode se c t ion 2933.6 wa s a

m e nde d to de ny c onduc t c re d its for inmate s who a re house d in a se c urity housing unit a

nd a re va lida te d ga ng m e m be rs or a ssoc i ate s. Ga

rc ia c onte nds tha

t his right to be

fre e from e x post fa c to la

w s wa s viola

te d be c a u se his re le a se date wa s e xte n de d whe n prison offic ia ls a pplie d am e nde d se c t ion 2933.6 to him . The sta

t e c ourt’ s re

je c tion of this c la im

wa s not c ontra

ry to, or a n unre a s ona

ble a p plic ation of, c le arly

e sta blishe d Supre m e C ourt pre c e d e nt. S e e 28 U.S.C . § 2254(d)(1); N

e v are z , 749 F.3d a

t 1128-29 (C a lifornia

c o urt did not unre a s ona

bly c onc lude tha

t se c t ion 2933.6 punishe s c onduc t oc c urring a fte r the origina l offe nse ). M o re o v e r, on this re c o rd, the sta t e c ourt did not make an unre a s ona

ble de te rm i nation of fa c t whe n re je c ting this c la im . Se e28 U.S.C . § 2254(d)(2). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 6 4 7 9 2
Martin Andrew OAKES v. LINCOLN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Lincoln County Board of Education, Lincoln County Board of Commissioners.

No. 61P07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Martin Andrew Oakes, Pro Se.

K. Dean Shatley, II, Asheville, Jeffrey Taylor, Lincolnton, for Lincoln Co. Bd. of Elections.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 14th day of November 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th day of November 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3521 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, as 

the ‘‘Spencer Byrd Powers, Jr. Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 3521 ES

1 SECTION 1. SPENCER BYRD POWERS, JR. POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mis4 sissippi, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Spencer 

5 Byrd Powers, Jr. Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Spencer Byrd Powers, 

10 Jr. Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate October 2 (legislative day, September 17), 2008. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3521 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Mississippi, as the ‘‘Spencer Byrd Powers, Jr. al Service located at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary,
STATE v. LOMAX.

No. COA07-1183.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 20, 2008.

Certification Date June 9, 2008.

Appeal from Iredell (06CRS56006, 06CRS56009).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-4572

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES D. ABBOTT, a/k/a John Jasper Roberson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CR-00-106)

Submitted: January 16, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

J. Stephen Welch, L.A. Smokey Brown, Jr., THE WELCH LAW FIRM, P.C.,

Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United

States Attorney, Isaac Johnson, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James D. Abbott appeals the district court’s April 12, 2000,

denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from a rental car

in which he was a passenger.

We hold the district court did not err in concluding the

evidence was admissible, and we affirm on the reasoning the court

articulated at the hearing on motion to suppress the evidence. See

Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 (1996); United States v.

Hassan El, 5 F.3d 726, 730 (4th Cir. 1993).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not significantly aid in the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

                                  Exhibit 23.1

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3) and related Prospectus of EOP Operating Limited Partnership for
the registration of $2.0 billion debt securities and warrants (registration
statement no. 333-58689), of our report dated February 9, 1999, except for Note
23, as to which the date is February 16, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of EOP Operating Limited Partnership and
Equity Office Predecessors included in the 1998 Annual Report (Form 10-K) of EOP
Operating Limited Partnership.

                                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 1999
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1874. CARLOS S. MADDOX v. RAZOR CAPITAL, LLC AS ASSIGNEE

OF GUARANTY BANK d/b/a BEST BANK.

This case originated as a collection action in Magistrate Court. Following an

adverse ruling, defendantCarlos S. Maddox appealed to Superior Court.TheSuperior

Court awarded $845.46 in damages and $129.00 in court costs to the plaintiff, and

Maddox appealed. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) requires the filing of an application for

discretionary appeal “in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000.00

or less.” Jennings v. Moss, 235 Ga. App. 357 (509 SE2d 655) (1998). Second, OCGA

§ 5-6-35 (a) (1) requires an application for discretionary appeal from an order of the

superior court disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision. See

English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Because

Maddox failed to follow the requisite appellate procedure, we lack jurisdiction over

this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

June 28, 2017

06/28/2017