alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST IV
                                Exhibit 32.2
                                ------------
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Christopher  Naunton,  Chief Financial  Officer of Ridgewood  Electric Power
Trust  IV.   (the   "Registrant"),certify,   pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 19, 2004

                                       Signature:

                                       /s/ Christopher Naunton
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Christopher Naunton
                                       Chief Financial Officer
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1212/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1212/2014 of 11 November 2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in            the Combined Nomenclature (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1212/2014                     

# of 11 November 2014

# concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2243 of 30 November 2017 on repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1212/2014                                 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Lauren P. Silvernail, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                               
|------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Lauren P. Silvernail                                                                                      
|                   |  |  |  | Lauren P. Silvernail Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer & Vice President, Corporate Development
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

    KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each undersigned director of
ECONOPHONE, INC., a Delaware corporation, which intends to file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997, hereby constitutes and appoints ALFRED
WEST, ALAN L. LEVY and RICHARD L. SHORTEN his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact
and agents, and each of them with full power to act without the others, for him
and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign such Annual
Report and any and all amendments thereto, and to file such Annual Report and
any and all amendments thereto with all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
and hereby grants unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full
power and authority to do and perform any and all other acts and things
requisite and necessary or advisable in connection with such Annual Report, and
confirms all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereby.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on the 30th
day of March, 1998.

                                          /s/ Alfred West
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Alfred West

                                          /s/ Alan L. Levy
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Alan L. Levy

                                          /s/ Gary S. Bondi
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Gary S. Bondi

                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Steven West

                                          /s/ Stephen Munger
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Stephen Munger
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3438 

To prohibit the use of funds for the establishment of National Marine 

Monuments unless certain requirements are met. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2008 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds for the establishment of National Marine Monuments unless certain requirements 

are met. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MARINE MONUMENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, no funds made available under any Act mak6 ing appropriations for fiscal year 2008 or 2009 may be 

7 used to establish a national monument or otherwise convey 

8 protected status to any area in the marine environment 

9 of the Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States 

10 under the Act of June 8, 1906 (16 U.S.C. 431 et seq.). 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS

2 

•S 3438 IS

1 (b) STUDY.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

2 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce may, 

3 as applicable, and in compliance with all requirements 

4 under title III of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (16 

5 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.) (including the procedures for des6 ignation and implementation under section 304 of that Act 

7 (16 U.S.C. 1434)) with respect to any proposed protected 

8 area, submit to Congress a study of the proposed pro9 tected area. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
BLINSON, et al. v. STATE of NC, et al.

No. 546P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2008.

Robert F. Orr, Asheville, Jeanette Doran Brooks, for Blinson, et al.

Grayson G. Kelley, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, John F. Maddrey, Assistant Solicitor-General, for State of NC & Fain.

Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Pressly M. Millen, Sean E. Andrussier, Melody C. Ray-Welborn, Raleigh, for Dell, Inc.

Stephen T. Inman, Ronald G. Seeber, City Attorney, Winston-Salem, for City of Winston-Salem & Joines, et al.

Davida W. Martin, Forsyth County Attorney, Winston-Salem, for Forsyth County, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 651 S.E.2d 268.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of December 2007 by Local Defendants to Dismiss Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of April 2008."

MARTIN, J., recused.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Pinnacle Resources, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the amendment to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                 /s/ Glen R. Gamble
                                     Glen R. Gamble
                     President & Chief Executive Officer

March 15, 2004


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Pinnacle Resources, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the amendment to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                     /s/ Robert A. Hildebrand
                         Robert A. Hildebrand
                         Chief Financial Officer



March 15, 2004
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed June 22, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00285-CV IN THE INTEREST OF N.J . AND E.J., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-50327-2014 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns We reinstate this appeal. We abated th is appeal in 2018 due to bankruptcy.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 8.2. The Court conducted an inde pendent review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Record s (PACER) system wh ich does not show a pending bankruptcy case associat ed with this appeal. We notified the parties by le tter, requesting they inform the Court of the status of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would result in the appeal being dismi ssed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b), (c). To date, neither party has responded.–2– Because we gave the parties an oppor tunity to show why we should not dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this appeal. See id. 42.3(b), (c).

180285F.P05 /Robert D.Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF N.J. AND E.J., CHILDREN, Appellant
No. 05-18-00285-CV On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-50327- 2014. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered June 22, 2022
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamar S. Nichols, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 665]

*1274Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), rendered December 19, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and grand larceny in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1], [2] [b]) and one count of grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [5]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because he was denied effective assistance of counsel and the plea was not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently entered. We reject defendant’s contentions. The contention of defendant that he received ineffective assistance of counsel is properly before us inasmuch as the alleged ineffectiveness infected the plea, including the waiver of the right to appeal *(see People v Jennings, 8*AD3d 1067, 1068 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 676 [2004]; *People v French,*292 AD2d 813 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 675 [2002]), but that contention “involves matters dehors the record, which are not reviewable on this direct appeal” *(People v Williams,*15 AD3d 863, 864 [2005]; *see People v Michalski,*15 AD3d 918, 919 [2005]). The contention of defendant that the plea was coerced and thus was not knowingly, voluntarily or intelligently entered “is belied by h[is] statement during the plea proceeding that [ ]he was not threatened, coerced or otherwise influenced against h[is] will into pleading guilty” *(People v Beaty,*303 AD2d 965, 965 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 559 [2003]; *see People v Reynolds,*295 AD2d 986 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 713 [2002]). Moreover, the fact that an attorney advises a defendant against going to trial does not constitute coercion where, as here, the record establishes that defendant was fully advised of the ramifications of his plea, that he understood those ramifications and that no other promises had been made to induce the plea *(see People v McDonnell,*302 AD2d 619 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 540 [2003]; *People v Dashnaw,*260 AD2d 658, 659 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 968 [1999]).

Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal “encompasses *1275the contention of defendant that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying his request for youthful offender status” *(People v Andrews,*285 AD2d 984, 984 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 938 [2001]; *see Williams,*15 AD3d at 864; *People v Sweeney, 4*AD3d 769, 770 [2004], *lv denied*2 NY3d 807 [2004]) as well as “his contentiont ] that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe” *(People v Duzant,*15 AD3d 860, 861 [2005]; *see People v Lococo,*92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; *People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Pine, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of LSB Financial Corp. (the "Registrant") that the QuarterlyReport of the Registrant of Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such report fairly present, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant forsuch period.

| Date    November 10, 2004      /S/ RANDOLPH F. WILLIAMSRandolph F. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate    November 10, 2004      /S/ MARY JO DAVIDMary Jo DavidVice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
TIMOTHY PARHAM , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20

- 0468 (UNA) ) CHARLES RETTIG

. ) ) Defendan t

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION The Court is mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply wit h the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch , 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdict ion depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice

t o the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano , 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). It is apparent tha t plaintiff’s complaint accomplishes none of these goals. Plaintiff alleges that the Internal Revenue Service has “used the transmitting utility TIMOTHY JAMES PARHAMTM and [his] copyrighted name Timothy Parham© without [his] permission and without compensating [him] monetarily as outlined in private TRUST documents 7/13/2020attached to [his] re vocable living trust and UCC

- 1 financial statement[.]” Am. Compl. at 1. He

purports to allow the Internal Revenue Service to “steal any amount as long as [it] agree[s] to
repay one - thousand (1000) times the amounts that [it has] deducted from [plaintiff’ s] wages retroactively.” Id . at 1

- 2. Missing from the complaint, as amended, is a statement of a cognizable claim or a basis for the Court’s jurisdiction. Because the complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a), the Court will dismiss it without prejudice.
An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE: July 13, 2020 /s/ JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 631/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 631/2014 of 12 June 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 631/2014                     

# of 12 June 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 June 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 48/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 48/2014 of 13 January 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Châtaigne d'Ardèche (PDO)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 48/2014                     

# of 13 January 2014

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Châtaigne d'Ardèche                        (PDO)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France’s application to register the name ‘Châtaigne d'Ardèche’                              was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Châtaigne d'Ardèche’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 January 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.6.****Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed**U.K.

#### FRANCEU.K.

Châtaigne d’Ardèche (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 235, 14.8.2013, p. 13.
IN RE J.B.R.

No. COA07-1251.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Rutherford (06JB112).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.