alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 449/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 449/2013 of 15 May 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 449/2013                     

# of 15 May 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 May 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>CHASE INDUSTRIES INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,798
<INVENTORY>                                     45,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,409
<PP&E>                                          97,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,092
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,884
<SALES>                                        255,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,154
<CGS>                                          219,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  219,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,918
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,920
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,920
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
        

</TABLE>
Gary P. RAMSEY v. N.C. DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES.

No. 412P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Neil Dalton, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

W. Scott Jones, Robert B. Long, Asheville, for Ramsey.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 647 S.E.2d 125.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of August 2007 by Respondent in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
Exhibit 10.47

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO
TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT

This Amendment Number One, dated as of January 17, 2002 (this "Amendment"), to the Trademark License Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2001 (the
"Existing Agreement"), by and among The Mrs. Fields' Brand, Inc. ("MFB"), a Delaware corporation, and Nonni's Food Company, Inc. ("Nonni's"), a Florida corporation. Capitalized
terms used herein not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the existing Agreement.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend certain terms of the Existing Agreement.

NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first written
above.

| |  | NONNI'S FOOD COMPANY, INC.  
| |  | ----------------------------
| |  | By:                         
| |  | THE MRS. FIELDS' BRAND, INC.
| |  | By:
STATE v. TAFT.

No. COA07-264.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Pitt (06CRS5473, 06CRS5474).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3605 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3605

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal 
                       history background checks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminal History Background Checks 
Pilot Extension Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a note) is 
amended by striking ``a 66-month'' and inserting ``a 78-month''.

            Passed the Senate September 26 (legislative day, September 
      17), 2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3605

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal 
                       history background checks.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          79,465
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  529,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,051
<INVENTORY>                                  2,064,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,768,242
<PP&E>                                         780,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                 660,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,080,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,821,111
<BONDS>                                         70,337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,684
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,178,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,080,248
<SALES>                                      1,864,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,864,281
<CGS>                                        1,110,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,317,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               435,605
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              92,892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,433
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,433
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3645 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

Magna Water District water reuse and groundwater recharge project, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the Magna Water District 

water reuse and groundwater recharge project, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Magna Water District 

5 Water Reuse and Groundwater Recharge Act of 2008’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 3645 IS

1 SEC. 2. MAGNA WATER DISTRICT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h 

4 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 1649. MAGNA WATER DISTRICT WATER REUSE AND 

6 GROUNDWATER RECHARGE PROJECT, UTAH. 

7 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera8 tion with the Magna Water District, Utah, may partici9 pate in the design, planning, and construction of perma10 nent facilities needed to establish recycled water distribu11 tion and wastewater treatment and reclamation facilities 

12 that will be used to provide recycled water in the Magna 

13 Water District. 

14 ‘‘(b) COST SHARING.—The Federal share of the cost 

15 of the project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 

16 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

17 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Funds provided by the Secretary 

18 shall not be used for operation or maintenance of the 

19 project described in subsection (a). 

20 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

21 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

22 $12,000,000.’’. 

23 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec24 tions in section 2 of the Reclamation Projects Authoriza25 tion and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. prec. 371) 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•S 3645 IS

1 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 

2 1638 the following: 

‘‘Sec. 1649. Magna Water District water reuse and groundwater recharge 

project, Utah.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3271 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3271

To amend the definition of commercial motor vehicle in section 31101 of 
title 49, United States Code, to exclude certain farm vehicles, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2008

  Mr. Inhofe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the definition of commercial motor vehicle in section 31101 of 
title 49, United States Code, to exclude certain farm vehicles, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE.

    Section 31101(1)(A) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
                    ``(A)(i) except for vehicles described in clause 
                (ii), has a gross vehicle weight rating or gross 
                vehicle weight of at least 10,001 pounds; or
                    ``(ii) is primarily engaged in the transportation 
                of agricultural commodities or farm supplies and has a 
                gross vehicle weight rating or gross vehicle weight of 
                at least the minimum weight of a commercial motor 
                vehicle (as defined by the State in which it is being 
                operated);''.

SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF GRANTS FOR STATES THAT INCREASE THE MINIMUM 
              WEIGHT FOR COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES.

    Section 31102 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f) Preservation of Grants for States That Increase the Minimum 
Weight for Commercial Motor Vehicles.--The Secretary may not withhold 
grant funding from a State under this section solely because the State 
authorizes drivers of vehicles engaged in the transportation of 
agricultural commodities or farm supplies that have a gross vehicle 
weight of more than 10,000 pounds and less than 26,001 pounds, to 
operate without complying with Federal regulations relating to 
commercial motor vehicles.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 15 - LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 10549


RE:      ITI Technologies, Inc. Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Registrations No. 33-89826, No. 333-08943, No. 333-08945, and No. 333-23751)

We are aware that our report dated April 28, 1998, on our reviews of interim
financial information of ITI Technologies, Inc. for the periods ended March 31,
1998 and 1997, and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 1998, is incorporated by reference in these
registration statements. Pursuant to Rule 436 (c) under the Securities Act of
1933, this report should not be considered a part of the registration statements
prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
May 8, 1998
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3259 

To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to the priority of 

certain high cost credit debts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2008 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to 

the priority of certain high cost credit debts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Credit Fair5 ness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EFFECTS OF HIGH COST CREDIT ON BANKRUPTCY 

7 PROCEEDINGS. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 101 of title 11, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3259 IS

1 (1) by redesignating paragraph (27B) as para2 graph (27C); and 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (27A) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(27B) The term ‘high cost consumer credit 

6 transaction’ means an extension of credit by a ‘cred7 itor’ (as defined in section 103 of the Truth in 

8 Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1602(f))), resulting in a 

9 consumer debt that has an applicable annual per10 centage rate (as determined in accordance with sec11 tion 107(a) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

12 1606(a)), and including costs and fees incurred in 

13 connection with the extension of such credit) that 

14 exceeds the lesser of— 

15 ‘‘(A) the sum of 15 percent and the yield 

16 on United States Treasury securities having a 

17 30-year period of maturity; or 

18 ‘‘(B) 36 percent.’’. 

19 (b) SUBORDINATION.—Section 510 of title 11, 

20 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

21 following: 

22 ‘‘(d)(1) For the purpose of distribution under this 

23 title, an allowed claim arising from a high cost consumer 

24 credit transaction shall be subordinated to all other claims. 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 3259 IS

1 ‘‘(2) Any lien securing a claim subordinated under 

2 paragraph (1) shall be transferred to the estate.’’. 

3 SEC. 3. EXCLUSION. 

4 Section 707(b) of title 11, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(8) Paragraph (2) shall not apply if the debtor’s pe7 tition resulted from a high cost consumer credit trans8 action.’’. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3482 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3482

To designate a portion of the Rappahannock River in the Commonwealth of 
               Virginia as the ``John W. Warner Rapids''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2008

Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Webb) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate a portion of the Rappahannock River in the Commonwealth of 
               Virginia as the ``John W. Warner Rapids''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN W. WARNER RAPIDS, FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Designation.--The portion of the Rappahannock River comprised 
of the manmade rapids located at the site of the former Embrey Dam in 
Fredericksburg, Virginia, and centered at the coordinates of N. 38.3225 
latitude, W. 077.4900 longitude, shall be known and designated as the 
``John W. Warner Rapids''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the portion of the 
Rappahannock River referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 
a reference to the John W. Warner Rapids.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Tara R. Rawlins, Appellant, v Wayne S. Barth, Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 738]

In a custody and visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J), dated June 2, 2004, which, after a hearing, denied her motion to transfer custody of the parties’ two children to her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother commenced this proceeding to transfer custody of the parties’ two children from the father to her. The father had custody pursuant to a stipulation between the parties. When the parties enter into a stipulation concerning custody, “it will not be set aside unless there is a sufficient change in circumstances since the time of the stipulation and unless the modification of the custody agreement is in the best interests of the children” *(Bobinski v Bobinski,*9 AD3d 441 [2004] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, the mother did not demonstrate that a change in custody would be in the best interests of the children under all of the facts and circumstances. Thus, the Family Court properly denied the mother’s motion for a change of custody *(see Bobinski v Bobinski, id.).*Adams, J.P., S. Miller, Ritter and Fisher, JJ., concur.
IN RE K.B.

No. COA07-1368.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Orange (07JA39, 07JA40, 07JA41).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, remanded in part.