Exhibit 99.1









ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM

For the Year Ended December 31,
2011



March 7, 2012











TABLE OF CONTENTS



|                                                                                             | Page | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | 
|                                                                                             |      | 
|ABBREVIATIONS AND CONVERSION FACTORS                                                         | 2    | 
|DEFINITIONS                                                                                  | 3    | 
|CORPORATE STRUCTURE                                                                          | 8    | 
|GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS                                                          | 9    | 
|RISK FACTORS                                                                                 | 19   | 
|STATEMENT OF RESERVES DATA                                                                   | 27   | 
|DIVIDENDS                                                                                    | 41   | 
|CAPITAL STRUCTURE                                                                            | 41   | 
|MARKET FOR SECURITIES                                                                        | 44   | 
|CONFLICTS OF INTEREST                                                                        | 44   | 
|INTERESTS OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS                                  | 44   | 
|CEASE TRADE ORDERS, BANKRUPTCIES, PENALTIES OR SANCTIONS                                     | 45   | 
|MATERIAL CONTRACTS                                                                           | 45   | 
|LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS                                                     | 45   | 
|INTERESTS OF EXPERTS                                                                         | 46   | 
|DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS                                                                       | 46   | 
|COMMITTEE INFORMATION                                                                        | 48   | 
|TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR                                                                 | 50   | 
|ADDITIONAL INFORMATION                                                                       | 50   | 
|ADVISORIES                                                                                   | 51   | 
|                                                                                             |      | 
|SCHEDULE A   REPORT ON RESERVES DATA BY INDEPENDENT QUALIFIED RESERVES  EVALUATOR OR AUDITOR | 54   | 
|SCHEDULE B  REPORT OF MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS ON RESERVES ON OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURE         | 56   | 











ABBREVIATIONS AND CONVERSION FACTORS



Abbreviations



The following are abbreviations of technical
terms used throughout this Annual Information Form:



“bbl” means barrel;



“bbl/d” means barrels per
day;



“bbls” means barrels;



“boe” means barrels of crude
oil equivalent;



“boepd” or “boe/d”
means barrels of crude oil equivalent per day;



“gj” means gigajoule, a term
used for measuring energy use, equal to 109 joules;



“km2” means square
kilometres;



“lt” means long ton;



“Mbbls” means thousand barrels;



“Mboe” means thousand barrels
of crude oil equivalent;



“Mcf” means thousand cubic
feet;



“Mcfe” means thousand cubic
feet equivalent;



“mi” means miles;



“mi2” means square
miles;



“Mlt” means thousands of
long tons;



“MMbbls” means million barrels;



“MMBoe” means million barrels
of crude oil equivalent;



“MMbtu” means million British
thermal units;



“MMcf” means million cubic
feet;



“MMcfd” or “MMcf/d”
means million cubic feet per day;



“MMcfe” means million cubic
feet equivalent; and



“ngls” means natural gas
liquids.



- 2 -







Conversion Factors



To conform to common usage, Standard Imperial
Units of measurement are used in this Annual Information Form to describe exploration and production activities. The following
table sets forth conversions between Standard Imperial Units and the International System of Units (or metric units).



|To Convert From     | To                                 | Multiply By
|------------------- | ---------------------------------- | -----------
|boe                 | Mcfe                               | 6.000      
|cubic feet          | cubic metres of gas                | 0.028      
|cubic metres of gas | cubic feet                         | 35.490     
|bbls of oil         | cubic metres                       | 0.159      
|cubic metres        | bbls of oil                        | 6.289      
|gigajoule           | thousand cubic feet of natural gas | 0.95       
|feet                | metres                             | 0.305      
|metres              | feet                               | 3.281      
|miles               | kilometres                         | 1.609      
|kilometres          | miles                              | 0.621      
|acres               | hectares                           | 0.400      
|hectares            | acres                              | 2.500      



Currency & Exchange Rate Information



All references to “$”, “Cdn$”
and “dollars” in this AIF refer to Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated. References to “US$” in this
AIF, refer to United States dollars. The following table sets forth, for each of the years indicated, the year-end noon exchange
rate, the average noon exchange rate and the high and low noon exchange rates of one U.S. dollar in exchange for Canadian dollars
using information provided by the Bank of Canada.



|         | Year Ended December 31,
|-------- | -----------------------
|         | 2011                   
|High     | $1.0604                
|Low      | $0.9449                
|Average  | $0.9891                
|Year-End | $1.0170                



The noon exchange rate on December 30, 2011,
using information provided by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of Canadian dollars into United States dollars, was $1.00 equals
US$0.9833.



DEFINITIONS



The following terms, when used in this Annual
Information Form, have the following meanings and, where applicable, are as set forth in National Instrument 51-101, “Standards
of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities,” issued by the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”).



- 3 -







“AECO Daily Index” means
the daily price as quoted in Canadian Enerdata’s Canadian Gas Price Reporter in the table entitled “Daily Spot Gas
Price at AECO C & NOVA Inventory Transfer” in the column “Price ($/GJ)”, Sub column “Avg”, for
each individual day.



“AECO Monthly Index” means
the Alberta Gas Price at AECO C in $/GJ as published monthly by Canadian Enerdata Ltd. in the “Canadian Gas Price Reporter”
in the table entitled “Canadian Natural Gas Supply Prices” and described in the first column, under “Alberta”
as “AECO C & N.I.T. One-Month Spot**” under heading “$/GJ” under the column “Avg” for the
delivery month.



“AIF” means this Annual Information
Form.



“associated gas” means the
gas cap overlying a crude oil accumulation in a reservoir.



“Corporation” or “Compton”
or “we” means Compton Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries where the context so requires.



“crude oil” or “oil”
means a mixture that consists mainly of pentanes and heavier hydrocarbons, which may contain small amounts of sulphur and other
non-hydrocarbon compounds, that is recoverable at a well from an underground reservoir, and that is liquid at the conditions under
which its volume is measured or estimated. It does not include solution gas or natural gas liquids.



“Deep Basin” means the area
situated along the north-eastern front of the Rocky Mountain belt, which is the deepest part of the Alberta synclinal sedimentary
basin. It contains low-permeability gas reservoirs, featuring regionally pervasive gas accumulations down-dip of regional aquifers.



“developed non-producing”
reserves are those reserves that either have not been on production, or have previously been on production, but are shut-in, and
the date of resumption of production is unknown.



“developed producing” reserves
are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from completion intervals open at the time of the estimate. These reserves
may be currently producing or, if shut-in, they must have previously been on production and the date of resumption of production
must be known with reasonable certainty.



“development costs” means
costs incurred to obtain access to reserves and to provide facilities for extracting, treating, gathering, and storing the oil
and gas from the reserves. More specifically, development costs, including applicable operating costs of support equipment and
facilities and other costs of development activities, are costs incurred to:



| | (a) | gain access to and prepare well locations for drilling, including surveying well locations for
the purpose of determining specific development drilling sites, clearing ground, draining, road building, and relocating public
roads, gas lines and power lines, to the extent necessary in developing the reserves;
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | drill and equip development wells, development type stratigraphic test wells, and service wells,
including the costs of platforms and of well equipment such as casing, tubing, pumping equipment, and the wellhead assembly;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | acquire, construct and install production facilities such as flow lines, separators, treaters,
heaters, manifolds, measuring devices, production storage tanks, natural gas cycling and processing plants, and central utility
and waste disposal systems; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 4 -







| | (d) | provide improved recovery systems.
| | --- | ----------------------------------



“development well” means
a well drilled inside the established limits of an oil or gas reservoir, or in close proximity to the edge of the reservoir, to
the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.



“exploration costs”
means costs incurred in identifying areas that may warrant examination and in examining specific areas that are considered to have
prospects that may contain oil and gas reserves, including costs of drilling exploratory wells and exploratory type stratigraphic
test wells. Exploration costs may be incurred both before acquiring the related property (sometimes referred to in part as “prospecting
costs”) and after acquiring the property. Exploration costs, which include applicable operating costs of support equipment
and facilities and other costs of exploration activities, are:



| | (a) | costs of topographical, geochemical, geological and geophysical studies, rights of access to properties
to conduct those studies, and salaries and other expenses of geologists, geophysical crews, and others conducting those studies
(collectively sometimes referred to as “geological and geophysical costs”);
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties, such as delay rentals, taxes (other than income
and capital taxes) on properties, legal costs for title defence, and the maintenance of land and lease records;
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | dry hole contributions and bottom hole contributions;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | costs of drilling and equipping exploratory wells; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (e) | costs of drilling exploratory type stratigraphic test wells.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------



“exploratory well” means
a well that is not a development well, a service well, or a stratigraphic test well.



“FD&A” means finding,
development and acquisition costs, which are used as a measure of capital efficiency.



“field” means an area consisting
of a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to the same individual geological structural feature and/or
stratigraphic condition. There may be two or more reservoirs in a field that are separated vertically by intervening impervious
strata or laterally by local geologic barriers or both. Reservoirs that are associated by being in overlapping or adjacent fields
may be treated as a single or common operational field. The geological terms “structural feature” and “stratigraphic
condition” are intended to denote localized geological features, in contrast to broader terms such as “basin,”
“trend,” “province,” “play,” or “area of interest”.



“forecast prices and costs”
means future prices and costs that are:



| | (a) | generally accepted as being a reasonable outlook of the future; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | if, and only to the extent that, there are fixed or presently determinable future prices or costs
to which the Corporation is legally bound by a contractual or other obligation to supply a physical product, including those for
an extension period of a contract that is likely to be extended, those prices or costs rather than the prices and costs referred
to in paragraph (a).
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 5 -







“future income tax expenses”
means future income tax expenses estimated year-by-year:



| | (a) | making appropriate allocations of estimated unclaimed costs and losses carried forward for tax
purposes, between oil and gas activities and other business activities;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | without deducting estimated future costs that are not deductible in computing taxable income;
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | taking into account estimated tax credits and allowances; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | applying to the future, pre-tax cash flows relating to the Corporation’s oil and gas activities
and the appropriate year end statutory tax rates, taking into account future tax rates already legislated.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



“future net revenue” means
the estimated net amount to be received with respect to the development and production of reserves estimated using forecast prices
and costs.



“gross” means:



| | (a) | the Corporation’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share before deduction of
royalties and without including any royalty interests of the Corporation in relation to production or reserves;
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the total number of wells in which the Corporation has an interest; or
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | the total area of properties in which the Corporation has an interest.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



“liquids” means crude oil,
natural gas liquids, and sulphur.



“natural gas” or “gas”
means the lighter hydrocarbons and associated non-hydrocarbon substances occurring naturally in an underground reservoir, which
under atmospheric conditions are essentially gases, but which may contain natural gas liquids. Natural gas can exist in a reservoir
either dissolved in crude oil (solution gas) or in a gaseous phase (associated gas or non-associated gas). Non-hydrocarbon substances
may include hydrogen sulphide, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen.



“natural gas liquids” means
those hydrocarbon components that can be recovered from natural gas as liquids including, but not limited to, ethane, propane,
butanes, pentanes plus, condensate, and small quantities of non-hydrocarbons.



“net” means:



| | (a) | the Corporation’s working interest (operating or non-operating) share after deduction of
royalty obligations, plus its royalty interests in production or reserves in relation to production or reserves;
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the number of wells obtained by aggregating the Corporation’s working interest in each of
its gross wells; or
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | the total area of properties in which the Corporation has an interest multiplied by the working
interest owned by the Corporation.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



“non-associated gas” means
an accumulation of natural gas in a reservoir where there is no crude oil.



- 6 -







“operating costs” or “production
costs” means costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities, including applicable
operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other costs of operating and maintaining those wells and related equipment
and facilities.



“probable” reserves are those
additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the actual remaining
quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.



“production” means recovering,
gathering, treating, field or plant processing (for example, processing gas to extract natural gas liquids) and field storage of
oil and gas.



“property” includes:



| | (a) | fee ownership or a lease, concession, agreement, permit, licence, or other interest representing
the right to extract oil or gas, subject to such terms as may be imposed by the conveyance of that interest;
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | royalty interests, production payments payable in oil or gas, and other non-operating interests
in properties operated by others; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | an agreement with a foreign government or authority under which the Corporation participates in
the operation of properties or otherwise serves as producer of the underlying reserves (in contrast to being an independent purchaser,
broker, dealer, or importer).
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A property does not include supply agreements
or contracts that represent a right to purchase, rather than extract, oil or gas.



“property acquisition costs”
means costs incurred to acquire a property (directly by purchase or lease or indirectly by acquiring another corporate entity with
an interest in the property) including:



| | (a) | costs of lease bonuses and options to purchase or lease a property;
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the portion of the costs applicable to hydrocarbons when land including rights to hydrocarbons
is purchased in fee; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | brokers’ fees, recording and registration fees, legal costs, and other costs incurred in
acquiring properties.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



“proved” reserves are those
reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities
recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.



“proved property” means a
property or part of a property to which reserves have been specifically attributed.



“reserves” are estimated
remaining quantities of oil and natural gas, and related substances anticipated to be recoverable from known accumulations, as
of a given date, based on (a) analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical and engineering data; (b) the use of established technology;
and (c) specified economic conditions, which are generally accepted as being reasonable and shall be disclosed. Reserves are classified
according to the degree of certainty associated with the estimates.



- 7 -







“reservoir” means a porous
and permeable subsurface rock formation that contains a separate accumulation of petroleum that is confined by impermeable rock
or water barriers and is characterized by a single pressure system.



“section” means one square
mile or 640 acres.



“service well” means a well
drilled or completed for the purpose of supporting production in an existing field. Wells in this class are drilled for the following
specific purposes: gas injection (natural gas, propane, butane, or flue gas), water injection, steam injection, air injection,
salt-water disposal, water supply for injection, observation, or injection for combustion.



“shut-in well” means a well
which is capable of economic production or which the Corporation considers capable of production but which for a variety of reasons,
including, but not limited to, lack of markets or development, is not placed on production at the present time.



“solution gas” means gas
dissolved in crude oil.



“stratigraphic test well”
means a geologically directed drilling effort, to obtain information pertaining to a specific geologic condition. Ordinarily, such
wells are drilled without the intention of being completed for hydrocarbon production. They include wells for the purpose of core
tests and all types of expendable holes related to hydrocarbon exploration. Stratigraphic test wells are classified as (a) “exploratory
type” if not drilled into a proved property; or (b) “development type”, if drilled into a proved property. Development
type stratigraphic wells are also referred to as “evaluation wells”.



“support equipment and facilities”
means equipment and facilities used in oil and gas activities, including seismic equipment, drilling equipment, construction and
grading equipment, vehicles, repair shops, warehouses, supply points, camps and division, district, or field offices.



“undeveloped” reserves are
those reserves expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (e.g. when compared to the cost
of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production. They must fully meet the requirements of the reserves category
(proved, probable, possible) to which they are assigned.



“unproved property” means
a property or part of a property to which no reserves have been specifically attributed.



“well abandonment costs”
means costs of abandoning a well (net of salvage value) and of disconnecting the well from the surface gathering system. Costs
of abandoning the gathering system or reclaiming the well site are not included.



CORPORATE STRUCTURE



Name and Incorporation



Compton was incorporated by articles of incorporation
pursuant to the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) (the “ABCA”) on October 15,
1992, as 544201 Alberta Ltd. The articles were amended on April 13, 1993, to change the Corporation’s name to Compton
Petroleum Corporation and the Corporation commenced active business operations in July 1993. The articles were amended on
November 21, 1994 and March 1, 1996, in order to remove the private company restrictions contained in the articles. A
further amendment was made to the articles on September 1, 1998, in order to create a class of preferred shares issuable in
series.



- 8 -







Compton’s head and principal office is
located at Suite 500, 850 – 2ndStreet S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2P 0R8. Compton’s registered office
is located at Suite 4300 Bankers Hall West, 888 – 3rdStreet, S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2P 5C5.



WIN Energy (Montana) Inc., formed under the
laws of Montana, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Compton Petroleum Corporation.



Compton Petroleum Finance Corporation, continued
under the laws of Canada, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Compton Petroleum Corporation. Compton Petroleum Finance Corporation
has no independent operations and has no significant liabilities or assets other inter-corporate indebtedness. The registered office
of Compton Petroleum Finance Corporation is 4300 Bankers Hall West, 888 – 3rd Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2P
5C5.







The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Compton Petroleum Corporation and all of its subsidiaries.



GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS



Compton Petroleum Corporation is a public corporation
actively engaged in the exploration, development and production of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and crude oil in western Canada.
The majority of its operations are located in the Deep Basin fairway of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (the “WCSB”),
providing multi-zone potential for future development and exploration opportunity.



With approximately 84% natural gas, Compton’s
strategy has shifted to developing its high-return, liquids-rich natural gas area at Niton and balancing its portfolio through
emerging crude oil prospects to offset continued low natural gas prices. The Corporation maximizes value by concentrating on opportunities
that generate strong returns on capital investment, such as the Rock Creek Formation, and by developing new horizons such as the
Wilrich and Notikewin at Niton. Compton‘s emerging oil plays target the Bakken/Big Valley, Ellerslie and Glauconite Formations
in the Southern Plains area as well as the Bakken/Big Valley Formation its Montana joint venture lands. The successful development
of these areas is expected to provide growth in oil production and reserves, further augmenting the Corporation’s large natural
gas reserve base.



- 9 -







Compton will create value by providing
appropriate investment returns for shareholders through further improving operating efficiencies, maximizing returns on capital
invested and focusing on higher return assets. Compton's shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol CMT.



Three Year History



With the deterioration of commodity prices,
particularly natural gas prices, in the summer of 2008, Compton, along with its Canadian peers, has faced a number of challenges
including operating in an environment of decreasing profit margins and limited availability of capital. In addition, debt on the
Corporation’s balance sheet relative to the current level of cash flow generation was higher than its industry peers. These
circumstances limited Compton’s ability to develop its extensive resource rich asset base over the past three years.



In 2009, Compton modified several aspects
of its business, creating a stronger and more stable organization. With continued low natural gas prices throughout the year, Compton’s
management (“Management”) focused on a business strategy that included executing a disciplined capital program
– living within cash flow – and targeting a minimum 20% rate of return on the capital invested in its assets and increasing
operating efficiencies. The Corporation’s cost structure decreased by 18% on a total dollar basis in 2009 through its focus
on reducing operating, administrative and interest expenses, which provided additional capital for reinvestment. Compton reduced
its debt level by 31% from 2008 with the proceeds of an equity issue and an overriding royalty (“ORR”)sale
in 2009, strengthening its capital structure. Net proceeds of $161.9 million were raised through the issue of 138 million units
composed of one common share (“Common Share”) and one share purchase warrant. The sale of the ORR provided proceeds
of $80.8 million. The ORR represents 4.25% of the gross production revenue on the Corporation’s existing land base less certain
transportation costs and marketing fees, calculated on a monthly basis. In addition, significant changes to the composition of
the executive team and board added proven track records and strength to the Corporation. Drilling activities in 2009 primarily
focused on the Niton property with one vertical and four horizontal wells successfully drilled by Compton. Horizontal drilling
and completion costs were reduced by approximately 20%, strengthening the economics of the play.



In 2010, Management maintained its philosophy
of living within cash flow, taking a prudent approach in its capital investment decisions and focusing its development strategy
to optimize asset value, emphasize cost reduction, and carefully manage its capital structure. Compton focused its field activities
on optimizing production from existing wells and drilling processes, improving operating efficiencies and well economics. As a
result, cash flow benefited from volumes that exceeded guidance due to improvements in well performance and initial production
rates as well as reduced costs, which somewhat offset the impact of declining natural gas prices. In addition, the Corporation
began development of its emerging oil properties with drilling in the Southern Plains area. Compton closed the final 0.75% of the
ORR transaction in 2010, bringing the total overriding royalty obligation to 5.0%. Compton also completed the sale a portion of
its natural gas assets located in the Niton and Gilby areas in Central Alberta for gross proceeds of $153.0 million.



In October 2010, Compton completed a Plan of
Arrangement (the “2010 Arrangement”) and recapitalization of its capital structure, exchanging all of
Compton’s US$450.0 million Notes for a combination of:



| | · | US$193.5 million 10% notes due 2017 (the
“Senior Notes”);
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------



| | · | US$45.0 million 10% notes due September
2011 (the “Mandatory Convertible Notes”); and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | US$184.5 million of cash.
| | - | -------------------------



- 10 -







This resulted in an overall reduction of the
Corporation’s total debt amount outstanding by approximately 33% to $382.8 million at December 31, 2010 from $568.9 million,
repositioning its capital structure and providing improved debt levels going forward. In addition, two new members were added to
the Credit Facility syndicate, and the interest margin was reduced by 0.5% from previous levels.



In December 2010 Compton implemented a series
of transactions designed to simplify Compton’s corporate structure consisting of the following:



| | · | effective December 10, 2010, Compton transferred
a nominal partnership interest in Compton Petroleum (partnership) to Compton Petroleum Holdings Corporation;
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | effective December 11, 2010, Compton Petroleum
Finance Corporation transferred all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Hornet Energy Ltd. to Compton;
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | effective December 30, 2010, Hornet Energy
Ltd. was liquidated and dissolved and subsequently Compton settled its inter-corporate debt with, and assumed the accounts payable
of, Compton Petroleum (partnership); and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | effective December 31, 2010, Compton Petroleum
Holdings Corporation was liquidated and dissolved and Compton Petroleum (partnership) ceased to exist.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In 2011, activities during the first
half were focused on strategic initiatives to maximize the return on capital invested throughout the year. Management continued
with its approach of living within cash flow and focusing its development strategy to optimize asset value, improve drilling and
operating practices, emphasize cost reduction, and carefully manage its capital structure. As a result, cash flow benefited from
improved netbacks due to improvements in operating efficiencies and well economics, which somewhat offset the impact of lower natural
gas prices.



While the debt reductions over the past two
years were significant, they did not result in the targeted adjustment in debt ratios due to the continued decline in natural gas
prices. Compton’s efforts to further reduce its debt and normalize its capital structure took on a renewed urgency in early
2011 due to:



| | · | the concerns for renewal of the Corporation’s
borrowing base by the lenders under the Senior Bank Facility as of May 31, 2011; and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | the maturity of the Mandatory Convertible
Notes on September 15, 2011 requiring either a dilutive issuance of Common Shares or significant (and potentially unavailable)
cash resources for the retirement of those obligations.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



After a thorough review of strategic alternatives,
the Corporation decided to undertake a plan of arrangement and recapitalization transaction (the “2011 Recapitalization”)
as a means by which Compton could normalize its capital structure and enhance liquidity. It was determined that normalizing its
capital structure and enhancing liquidity would allow the Corporation to have an appropriate debt level, provide sufficient cash
flow to adequately invest in and develop its asset base, and provide accretive growth over a multi-year horizon. In addition, the
completion of the 2011 Recapitalization increased the credit facility to $160.0 million and extended its period and maturity. In
the third quarter of 2011, Compton completed the 2011 Recapitalization, which included the following aspects:



| | · | Exchange of the Senior Notes and Mandatory
Convertible Notes for a combination of Common Shares and rights to subscribe for additional Common Shares (“Rights”);
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Addition of approximately $50.0 million
of new equity raised by way of a backstopped offering of Rights, the proceeds of which were applied to further reduce debt;
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Consolidation of existing common shares
on a 200 to 1 basis;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------



- 11 -







| | · | The issuance of cashless warrants (“Cashless
Warrants”) to existing shareholders; and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Reduction of net debt by 64% to $161.0
million since December 31, 2010 and by 81% from $854.7 million as at September 30, 2009, resulting in a decrease of annual cash
interest and financing expenses by approximately $29.2 million.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



With the completion of the 2011 Recapitalization,
Management focused on drilling and liquids exploration to develop its high-return, liquids-rich natural gas area at Niton and emerging
crude oil opportunities in the Southern Plains. These activities are expected to prove the value of other key areas and horizons
in the Corporation’s asset base, which provide significant upside potential through its multiple zone development opportunities
and contiguous land blocks.



DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS



Business Plan and Operating Strategy



The Corporation’s business plan is to
increase shareholder value through the effective exploration, development and exploitation of its core geographic areas and by
making strategic acquisitions as appropriate. This will be achieved through the evaluation of the benefits of various opportunities
and pursuit of those that provide the optimal return, maximizing cash flow and asset value. Compton has experienced professional,
management, technical, and support staff sufficient to carry out its business plan and its current exploration, exploitation, development,
production, engineering, financial, and administrative functions.



The Corporation’s operating strategy includes
the components set forth below:



Maximize Shareholder Value Through
Prudent Investment Decisions. Compton will utilize a disciplined business model to focus on value creation when reinvesting
internally generated cash flow, providing the Corporation and shareholders with optimal returns. This perspective will be utilized
in the evaluation and selection of prospects, which include development activities to maximize the value of its strong asset base
or responding to future growth opportunities.



Implement Measured and Flexible Financial
Approach. Compton will take a flexible financial approach, adjusting its 2012 capital spending up or down, depending upon how
economic circumstances evolve during the year, and utilize available cash flow and funds from other sources for capital expenditures.
Prudent financial management will allow the Corporation to live within its means and reduce internal cost structures while managing
in periods of low commodity prices. Other components of Compton’s financial approach include establishing appropriate leverage
ratios and maintaining an active commodity hedging program.



Concentrate on Core Areas. Compton is
focused on its core areas, which provide a solid portfolio of exploration, development, and exploitation prospects. These areas
are the geographical focus of the Corporation’s seismic database rights and are areas in which Management and staff have
significant technical expertise and operational experience. Compton intends to evaluate exploration opportunities within the WCSB.



Focus on Unconventional High Return, Liquids-Rich
Natural Gas in Large Resource Plays. Compton has gained considerable technical expertise and achieved significant success in
exploring for unconventional, larger natural gas accumulations in the WCSB. Compton’s Niton area offers strong returns on
investment due to the liquid-rich nature of its natural gas. Management is focused on developing these natural gas opportunities
in Niton because of their strong returns, generally longer life, and lower exploration risk compared to conventional natural gas
opportunities. In addition, the Corporation’s areas of large contiguous land provide economies of scale for development,
increasing return on capital.



- 12 -







Focus on Emerging Oil Prospects. Compton
is focused on increasing the amount of oil in its portfolio, which will improve the Corporation’s cash flow in the current
economic cycle. The Corporation has identified promising oil plays in the Southern Plains area and in Montana, where Ellerslie,
Mannville, Big Valley and Bakken Formation wells are in production. Going forward, Compton plans to increase its focus on developing
these prospects, maximizing the benefit of Compton’s significant upside potential through the use of multiple zone horizontal
drilling on its contiguous land blocks.



Control Infrastructure and Operatorship.
Compton believes that control over gathering and processing infrastructure and operatorship of drilling programs will continue
to be critical to the success of the Corporation’s full-cycle exploration program. Compton currently owns or has access to
critical infrastructure in three core areas. Being an operator ensures discretion in determining the timing and methodology of
ongoing exploration, development, and exploitation programs. Compton expects to continue to expand its working interest in core
areas to maximize these operating efficiencies.



Operate Efficiently to Maximize Return on
Investment. Compton is committed to providing optimal returns from funds spent on operations, whether for drilling or operating
costs. As a result, Management is focused on increasing operating efficiencies and production rates while decreasing drilling costs
to achieve a minimum return on capital investments, and lowering operating costs with a goal of becoming a low cost producer (first
quartile) compared with its peers. Compton believes that the prudent management of its assets will provide attractive returns on
investment for its shareholders.



Principal Properties



Compton engages in oil and gas exploration and
development in the WCSB in Alberta, Canada. In this large geographical region, Compton’s primary focus is on the Deep Basin
portion of the WCSB which extends from Northwest Alberta and British Columbia to the United States border. Compton has four Deep
Basin development gas plays: the Rock Creek sands and other zones at Niton in central Alberta, the shallower Southern Plains sand
play in southern Alberta, the Basal Quartz sands at High River in southern Alberta, and an exploratory play at Callum/Cowley/Todd
Creek in the Foothills area of southern Alberta. In addition, the Corporation has begun to focus on developing its emerging oil
plays in the Southern Plains: the Ellerslie and Glauconite Formations and Big Valley Member of the Wabamum Group. These are areas
in which Management and staff have significant technical expertise and operational experience. The Corporation also has holdings
located in northern Montana, where it has signed a farmout and joint venture agreement for exploration of these lands.



Development Properties



Niton (Central Alberta)



The Niton area includes multi-zone, liquids-rich,
tight gas plays with production to date primarily coming from Jura-Cretacepis Rock Creek and Ellerslie sandstones. Compton has
a large number of mineral agreements that cover specific zonal rights in this area. For the most part, however, the Corporation
has an average 70% working interest in 139 gross sections of land to the base of the Rock Creek Member of the Fernie Group.



The Niton area has other productive zones that
provide the opportunity to expand the Corporation’s development base by moving into other geological horizons. These zones
lie above the Rock Creek and include the Wilrich and Notikewin sandstones of the Upper Mannville, Spirit River Group. Prior to
2010, these zones were generally exploited by commingling production with vertical Rock Creek and/or Ellerslie producers. In early
2010 and 2011, Compton and other operators began successful exploration of these zones using horizontal drilling with multi-stage
fracturing techniques.



- 13 -







The Rock Creek’s consistent thickness
but variable permeability lends itself well to horizontal drilling and multi-stage fracturing. Compton has been a leader in the
development of this play in Niton with 18 horizontal wells producing from the zone at year-end. Although a typical horizontal Rock
Creek well has an average initial rate of 3 MMcf/d with 30 bbls/MMCF of NGLs in the first month of production, some wells can produce
at considerable better rates.



For example, one of the Rock Creek wells drilled
during the fourth quarter 2010 had an initial test rate of 5.5 MMcf/d with 30 bbl/MMcf of liquids. The well was on production,
and in late February 2011, continued to produce at approximately 3.3 MMcf/d and 35 bbl/MMcf of liquids. Compton completed and
tied in two Rock Creek wells during the first quarter of 2011, realizing first month average production rates of 932 Mcf/d with
185 bbl/d of liquids and 3.2 MMcf/d and 87 bbl/d of liquids. Another Rock Creek horizontal well initially tested at 2.3 mmcf/d
and 150 bbl/d of liquids. Two more Rock Creek horizontal wells were drilled late in the fourth quarter and completed in early
2012. One achieved initial production of between 3.0 to 3.3 mmcf/d of gas and 125 to 150 bbls/d of NGLs. The well is currently
shut in awaiting facilities upgrade. The second well had initial production rates of 1.4 mmcf/d of gas plus 250 to 300 bbls/d of
oil. The well was on production approximately 800 mcf/d of gas plus 65 bbls/d of oil at the end of February 2012.



The Wilrich sandstone reservoir has been identified
as providing significant upside potential for the Corporation. Several horizontal wells targeting Wilrich sandstones were drilled
during 2011 in and around the Niton area. Compton participated in a well that was tied-in during the third quarter, producing approximately
2.9 mmcf/d of natural gas and 20 bbl/mmcf of liquids. This result reinforced
Compton’s decision to pursue the play with increased capital. In December 2011, Compton commenced drilling a 100% working
interest horizontal well along the prospective trend in Niton. The well achieved an initial test production rate of 3.4 mmcf/d
of natural gas plus 60 bbls/d of oil and is currently on production.



Also in December 2011, Compton spudded a second
horizontal well to test another shallower horizon. This well targeted Notikewin valley-fill channel sandstones, which is expected
to add significant development opportunities at Niton. The Notikewin well had initial test production rates of 2.2 mmcf/d of natural
gas plus 1.9 bbls/d of NGLs. The well is currently awaiting completion.



The continued strength from operations in the
Niton area was the major contributor to sustained production volumes in 2011. Niton continues to generate strong rates-of-return
from the liquids-rich, high-return Rock Creek Formation. It also offers significant new development potential through the exploitation
of sandstone reservoirs in the Wilrich and Notikewin zones.



Southern Plains (Southern Alberta)



The Southern Plains and overlying Edmonton Horseshoe
Canyon shallow gas zones consist of an under-pressured, essentially water-free, multi-sand zone that averages 450 metres in thickness
per zone, totalling over 900 metres in thickness. The entire section is comprised of multiple Belly River sands, silts, shales,
and coals, overlain by the Edmonton/Horseshoe Canyon coals that similarly include sands, silts, and shales.



With control of 720 gross sections of land at
an average 87% working interest, this land base provides a significant multi-year, low risk natural gas drilling inventory at two
to four wells per section. Ample infrastructure is in place in the area for future production increases with 31,000 horsepower
of compression and approximately 1,300 kilometres of pipeline.



- 14 -







In late 2010, Compton shifted its focus to
its emerging oil opportunities in the Southern Plains with the drilling of an Ellerslie Formation horizontal oil
well. Initial indications were promising with approximately 700 metres of pay being encountered in the wellbore. In 2011,
further development of the Ellerslie, Mannville and Big Valley Formations began, which provides significant upside potential
for the Corporation. During the first quarter, an Ellerslie oil well was completed in the Southern Plains area to evaluate
oil potential. The well currently produces approximately 500 mcf/d of natural gas and 30 bbl/d of oil.  The results are
very encouraging, despite challenges in the completion that resulted in only eight out of the 12 stages being
successfully fractured. Future optimization of completion methods is expected to yield improved production levels. Late in 2011,
the Corporation drilled two vertical oil wells: one in the Basal Quartz and the second in the Ellerslie Formation. These
wells are expected to be put on production late in the first and second quarters, respectively.  A second horizontal
Ellerslie oil well is currently drilling, with results expected later in the first quarter of 2012.



Compton also began to pursue
the development of its 24 net prospective sections of Alberta Bakken oil prospects, targeting the Big Valley Formation.
This Formation has established oil production from existing vertical wells in the area, providing normal to over-pressured,
water free production. Management has completed analogy work that indicates the prospective potential in Compton’s
lands. In 2011, the Corporation acquired an additional 25 sections of land, prospective for the Big Valley/Bakken Formation.
Compton has secured all prospective land holdings for developing the new play and assuming initial success of exploratory drilling,
the play has the potential to expand into approximately 90 locations.



High River (Southern Alberta)



Discovered by Compton in 1999, the High River
asset is a low to medium permeability Basal Quartz channel sandstone pool, which is the southern Alberta extension of the Lower
Cretaceous Deep Basin gas trend. Compton controls 151 gross sections with an average 86% working interest in this area that is
prospective for the Basal Quartz Pool. This pool has cumulative production of 132 BCF. With an annual pool wide base decline of
14%, the pool is an asset with predictable, stable, water free production of liquids rich gas.



The High River play has historically been developed
through drilling one to two vertical wells per section. Reservoir modeling indicates up to four vertical wells per section may
be necessary to fully develop the play. In 2008, Compton obtained approval to down space 45 of 57 developed sections to three wells
per section. This will provide more latitude when establishing optimal well densities in order to maximize the value of the Corporation’s
development potential. The 12 remaining sections have sufficient drainage with current well densities to adequately access the
reservoir.



Compton initiated horizontal drilling with multi-stage
fracture stimulations in the pool with the drilling of one well in late 2007 and an additional four wells in 2008. A key component
of success in this area will be to minimize drilling and completion costs. Since 2009, Compton completed a thorough asset review,
meshing the engineering and geological data to better understand the unexploited parts of the reservoir and target horizontal wells
in this formation. Management then focused on refining the drilling and fracture design, and applying the knowledge gained through
horizontal drilling to increase operational efficiencies and economics.



- 15 -







In 2010, two wells targeting the Basal Quartz
Formation were refractured, resulting in combined average production of 450 Mcf/d, which was 4.5-times previous levels. Refracturing
a well in an existing producing tight sand zone can open new pathways to access gas-charged rock and increase production at lower
capital costs. With this success, Compton has identified additional future refracture locations from its inventory of over 100
existing producing vertical wells at High River. This area provides substantial future growth potential, which can be accessed
as natural gas prices recover.



Exploratory Properties



Callum-Cowley & Todd Creek (Foothills
Area, Southern Alberta)



Compton controls 133 gross sections at an average
84% working interest in the Foothills area of southern Alberta. The Callum-Cowley area is unique in western Canada consisting of
a series of over-pressured, thrusted, multi-stacked tight gas-saturated, water-free Belly River sands. This play is largely exploratory
at this time. Based on Compton’s initial detailed geological, geophysical, and engineering analysis of seismic, cores, well
logs, and test and production data, Callum-Cowley appears to exhibit many similarities to the deep unconventional gas pools of
the Rocky Mountain region of the United States.



The contortion of the tight sand layers creates
fractures, greatly enhancing permeability while creating conduits to the tighter gas-charged portion of the rock. Compton targets
its drilling to access locations with these fractures, which is crucial to better access natural gas flows and increase the economics
of the play. While there is substantial well core data in the area, additional geochemical work is being done to determine placement
of the gas, characteristics of the rock and proper extraction techniques. In late 2010, Compton drilled two wells in the Callum/Cowley
area. The first well resulted in initial production of 750 mcf/d and the second well producing at lower than anticipated gas rates
of 429 Mcf/d but also produced 30 bb/d of oil, indicating a prospective Belly River oil bearing sheet.



At Todd Creek, Compton began exploration of
an exciting new play in 2008 when a new zone was successfully completed in an existing wellbore. In 2009, Compton commenced drilling
a step-out well located close to the 2008 discovery well completed that produced at 2.7 MMcf/d.



Alberta Bakken (Montana, U.S.)



In 2010 and 2011, the Alberta Bakken Fairway,
which runs through Alberta and Montana, attracted more industry attention. Compton holds 79,000 net acres of land on the Blood
Indian Reserve in Montana through the previous acquisition of WIN Energy. The Corporation’s acreage has a long tenure (expires
in 2017) and has one well previously drilled on it. Further exploration and evaluation of this area would be necessary to determine
the potential of this property.



In 2011, Compton signed a farmout and joint
venture agreement for exploration of the area. The agreement grants Compton’s partner the ability to earn a 50% interest
in this area by incurring capital expenditures on the exploration and development of the property. The Corporation will retain
a 50% working interest in the area without incurring any capital expenditure commitments. The partner has committed to completion
of a survey program at a minimum cost of $2.0 million on or before July 31, 2012, and to spud a test well on one of three earning
blocks or before December 31, 2012, targeting the Bakken oil formation. Upon completion of the well, the partner will earn 50%
working interest in that earning block and is granted the option to drill one or more option wells to earn the two un-earned blocks.



The joint venture is a key strategic partnership
for Compton as it provides the Corporation with the ability to verify the potential of these lands at no cost, which otherwise
would have remained undeveloped until additional cash flow came available.



- 16 -







Principal Markets and Distribution



Compton’s natural gas production is sold
to credit worthy counterparties under contracts between AECO Daily Index price sales and AECO Monthly Index price sales, with transactions
at Nova Inventory Transfer. A small portion (3%) of the sales portfolio is dedicated to aggregator pools under pricing that reflects
the AECO Indices. Natural gas is transported through regulated pipelines in the Province of Alberta at tariffs which require either
Provincial or Federal regulatory approval.



The Corporation’s crude oil sales are
priced at market using Edmonton postings as a benchmark and are typically 30-day evergreen contracts. Natural gas liquids are priced
on an annual basis with respect to product premiums with the base price for each component reflecting posted prices. Crude oil
and ngls are transported to the point of sale to credit worthy counterparties using a combination of pipelines and trucking services.



Cycles



The petroleum industry is both cyclical and
seasonal in nature. The winter-summer cycle affects certain aspects of the business such as commodity prices and the ability to
drill on certain properties during spring break-up. The price per barrel received by the Corporation is weighted to North American
natural gas prices and can be adversely affected by mild weather conditions. In early 2009, excess natural gas supplies reduced
commodity prices and resulted in a decrease in the price received by Compton. This pressure continued to be experienced through
2010, 2011 and into 2012.



Environmental Policies



Compton expects excellence in health, safety
and environmental performance and is committed to conducting all operations in a safe manner that minimizes environmental impact,
while meeting regulatory requirements and corporate standards. Compton maintains a comprehensive range of internal programs and
controls to promote regulatory compliance and an appropriate level of safety and environmental protection in all of its operations.
Its proactive program includes annual environmental compliance audits and inspection programs to ensure the Corporation’s
facilities continually meet or exceed regulatory standards. Compton has participated in programs for continual improvement set
forth by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, Energy Resources and Conservation Board, Alberta Environmental Protection
and other related associations, reflecting the Corporation’s commitment to protecting the environmental quality of the areas
in which it operates.



Compton views and treats the southern Alberta
Foothills region as a unique environmental eco-system. Together with a number of southern Alberta ranching operations, the Corporation
is completing a rangeland health assessment that addresses optimal ways to restore these eco-systems to their natural state. This
includes providing funding of studies on native rough fescue grasses by the University of Alberta, as well as working closely with
both industry and landowner work groups.



The Corporation carries out its activities in
compliance with all relevant regulations and industry best practices. Compton’s Reserves, Operations and Environmental, Health
and Safety Committee have oversight responsibilities for the Corporation’s overall policies and guidelines with respect to
(a) engineering, reserves, operations, (b) the environment, and (c) health and safety. The Committee’s Charter can be located
on the Corporation’s website at www.comptonpetroleum.com.



- 17 -







Mazeppa Processing Partnership



In June of 2003, Mazeppa Processing Partnership
(“MPP”) acquired certain midstream assets from an independent third party. The assets consist of major natural
gas gathering and processing facilities in Southern Alberta. Compton does not have an ownership position in MPP. However, the Corporation
through a management agreement manages the activities of MPP and is considered to be the primary beneficiary of MPP’s operations.
The results of the midstream activities are immaterial to Compton’s consolidated financial condition.



In 2009, Compton completed the renegotiation
of the MPP processing and other related agreements for a further term of five years, expiring on April 30, 2014, at which time
Compton may renew the agreement under terms determined at that time or purchase the MPP units for the predetermined maximum amount
of $27.8 million. In the event that the Corporation does not renew the processing agreement or exercise the purchase option, the
partner may dispose of the partnership units to an independent third party. In connection with the renewal, Compton has reclassified
a portion of the non-controlling interest associated with MPP as MPP term financing. MPP term financing is included as a liability
in the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation.



The MPP Agreements prescribe minimum throughput
volumes and dedicated reserves which, if not exceeded, may require a buy-down of the purchase option. The cumulative prepayment
of the purchase option since the renewal of the MPP Agreements in 2009 is $10.4 million, including $9.2 million in 2011. The prepayments
have reduced the amount of the MPP purchase amount to $17.4 million.



Bank Debt



On September 27, 2011, Compton reached
an agreement with a new syndicate of lenders for a credit facility of $160.0 million, including a working capital facility
of $15.0 million and a syndicated facility of $145.0 million (together the “Credit Facilities”). At
December 31, 2011, approximately $113.5 million was drawn on the Corporation’s outstanding bank debt. The semi-annual
review of Compton’s borrowing base under its reserve-based credit facility (the “Facility”) was
completed subsequent to year-end. Given the near-term outlook for natural gas prices, Compton’s Facility has been set
at $140.0 million, comprised of a working capital facility of $15.0 million and a syndicated facility of $125.0 million. The
Facility has a term of one-year to February 8, 2013, with the usual semi-annual lenders review at the end of March and
September 2012; the review may change the amount available thereunder. The borrowing base of the Credit Facilities is determined based
on, among other things, the Corporation’s current reserve report, results of operations, the lenders view of the
current and forecasted commodity prices and the current economic environment.



The Credit Facilities provide that advances
may be made by way of prime loans, bankers’ acceptances, US base rate loans, LIBOR loans and letters of credit. Advances
will bear interest at the applicable lending rate plus a margin based on Compton’s debt to trailing cash flow ratio. The
Credit Facilities is secured by a fixed and floating charge debenture on the assets of the Corporation.



Specialized Skills and Knowledge



Exploration for and development of petroleum
and natural gas resources requires specialized skills and knowledge, including in the areas of petroleum engineering, geophysics,
geology and land. Compton has obtained personnel with the required specialized skills and knowledge to carry out their respective
operations. While the current labour market in the industry is highly competitive, the Corporation expects to be able to attract
and maintain appropriately qualified employees in 2012.



- 18 -







Employees



As at December 31, 2011, Compton had 56
full-time equivalent employees in its Calgary office and 44 full-time equivalent employees at field locations.



Competitive Conditions



Competitive conditions affecting the oil and
gas industry are described under the heading “Competition” in the “Risk Factors” section of this AIF.



RISK FACTORS



Following is a list of risks that Compton faces
in its normal course of business. If any of these risks actually occur, Compton’s business, financial condition, results
of operations, cash flows and prospects could be harmed. Such risks and uncertainties are not the only ones the Corporation faces.
Additional risks and uncertainties, including those of which Management is currently unaware or that are deemed immaterial, may
also adversely affect Compton’s business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects.



Global Financial Condition



Operations are affected
by local, national and worldwide economic conditions and the condition of the oil and gas industry. Recent disruptions in the credit
markets and concerns about the global economy have had an adverse impact on global financial markets.These and other factors
may affect Compton’s ability to obtain equity or debt financing in the future on favourable terms. Additionally, these factors,
as well as other related factors, may cause decreases in the Corporation’s asset values that may be other than temporary,
which may result in impairment losses. If such increased levels of volatility and market turmoil continue, or if more extensive
disruptions of the global financial markets occur, operations could be adversely impacted and the trading price of Compton’s
Common Shares may be adversely affected.



Additional Funding Requirements



Compton’s ongoing activities may not generate
sufficient cash flow from operations to fund future exploration, development, or acquisition programs. The Corporation may require
additional funding and there can be no assurance that debt or equity financing will be available or sufficient to meet these requirements
or that it will be on acceptable terms. Continued uncertainty in domestic and international credit markets compounds the risk of
obtaining debt financing. Failure to obtain such financing on a timely basis could cause Compton to forfeit interests in certain
properties, miss certain acquisition opportunities, and reduce or terminate operations. This may result in the Corporation not
being able to replace its reserves or maintain production, which will have an adverse effect on its financial position. Failure
to obtain additional funding may also result in the Corporation failing to meet financial obligations as they come due or may result
in the acceleration of the Corporation’s debt.



Liquidity Risk



Liquidity risk is the risk that
the Corporation is not able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. If the Credit Facilities are not renewed
on February 8, 2013, Compton’s $140.0 million term Credit Facilities will mature. The lenders will reassess the amount
of the credit facility semi-annually on March 31 and September 30; the review may change the amount available thereunder. As at December 31, 2011, Compton had $113.5 million outstanding under its Credit
Facilities.



- 19 -







As of December 31,2011, Compton, on a consolidated basis,
had outstanding total net debt of approximately $161.0 million, of which approximately $144.0million
was secured debt, which includes bank debt, secured by a first fixed and floating charge debenture, and MPP term financing, secured
by the underlying gas plant assets. Should Compton’s indebtedness increase substantially, it could affect the Corporation’s
financial position and operational flexibility. A substantial amount of debt could have important negative consequences on Compton,
such as:



| | · | limiting its ability to obtain additional
financing, if needed, or refinancing, when needed, for debt service requirements, working capital, capital expenditures or other
purposes;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | increasing its vulnerability to current
and future adverse economic and industry conditions;
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | requiring Compton to dedicate a substantial
portion of its cash flows from operations to make payments on its debt;
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | causing Compton to monetize assets on terms
that may be unfavourable to Compton;
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | causing Compton to offer debt or equity
securities on terms that may not be favourable to Compton or its shareholders;
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | reducing funds available for operations,
future business opportunities or other purposes;
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | limiting Compton‘s flexibility in
planning for, or reacting to, changes and opportunities in its business and its industry;
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | increasing employee turnover and uncertainty,
diverting management’s attention from routine business and hindering its ability to recruit qualified employees; and
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | placing Compton at a competitive disadvantage
compared to its competitors that have less debt.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Compton’s Credit Facilities
and the terms and conditions of its other indebtedness may permit Compton to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, including
secured indebtedness in some circumstances. To the extent, Compton incurs additional indebtedness, some or all of the risks discussed
above will increase. The terms of this indebtedness restrict Compton’s ability to sell assets, apply the proceeds of such
sales, and reinvest in its business. As a result, some or all of the risks discussed above may increase.



Restrictive covenants in agreements
governing Compton’s indebtedness may reduce Compton’s operational and financial flexibility, which may prevent Compton
from capitalizing on business opportunities.



The terms of the agreements governing Compton’s
indebtedness contain a number of operating and financial covenants restricting its ability to among other things:



| | · | incur additional debt;
| | - | ----------------------



| | · | create liens on assets;
| | - | -----------------------



| | · | pay dividends or distributions on, or redeem
or repurchase, its capital stock;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | make investments;
| | - | -----------------



- 20 -







| | · | engage in sale and leaseback transactions;
| | - | ------------------------------------------



| | · | engage in transactions with affiliates;
| | - | ---------------------------------------



| | · | transfer or sell assets;
| | - | ------------------------



| | · | issue and sell equity interests in Compton’s
wholly-owned subsidiaries;
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | guarantee debt;
| | - | ---------------



| | · | restrict dividends and other payments to
the Corporation;
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------



| | · | consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially
all of Compton’s assets and the assets of its subsidiaries; and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | engage in unrelated businesses.
| | - | -------------------------------



The Credit Facilities limit the extent to which
the Corporation can incur other debt. Management does not anticipate these restrictions to have any limiting or adverse effect
on the operations of the Corporation. Any reduction in Compton’s ability to access credit under the Credit Facilities may
result in the Corporation not being able to meet its financial obligations as they come due.



In addition, Compton’s ability to comply
with covenants contained in the agreements governing other debt to which Compton is or may become a party may be affected by events
beyond its control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. Its failure to comply with these covenants
could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in an acceleration of its debt and cross-defaults
under its other debt. This could require Compton to repay or repurchase debt prior to the date it would otherwise be due, which
could adversely affect its financial condition. Even if Compton is able to comply with all applicable covenants, the restrictions
on its ability to manage its business in its sole discretion could adversely affect its business by, among other things, limiting
its ability to take advantage of financings, mergers, acquisitions and other corporate opportunities that Compton believes would
be beneficial to it.



Volatility of Prices, Markets, and Marketing Production



Oil and gas prices have historically been extremely
volatile. Factors which contribute to oil and gas price fluctuations include global demand, domestic and foreign supplies of oil
and gas, the price of foreign oil and gas imports, decisions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries relating to export
quotas, domestic and foreign governmental regulations, political conditions in producing regions, global and domestic economic
conditions, the price and availability of alternative fuels, including liquefied natural gas, and weather conditions.



The Corporation’s financial condition
is substantially dependent on, and highly sensitive to, oil and gas commodity prices. Any material decline in prices could result
in a material reduction of Compton’s operating results, revenue, reserves, and overall value. Lower commodity prices could
change the economics of production from some wells. As a result, the Corporation could elect not to drill, develop, or produce
from certain wells. In addition, Compton is impacted by the differential between prices paid by refiners for light quality oil
and the grades of oil produced by the Corporation.



Current market conditions are particularly challenging
with economic uncertainty continuing to negatively impact commodity prices as well as access to credit and capital markets. These
conditions impact Compton’s customers and suppliers and may alter Compton’s spending and operating plans. There may
be unexpected business impacts from this market uncertainty.



- 21 -







Under IFRS impairment standards, oil and gas
assets are reviewed quarterly to determine if the carrying value of the assets exceeds their expected future cash flows. Low commodity
prices may reduce expected future cash flows and require a write down to the fair value of the Corporation’s oil and gas
properties, thereby adversely affecting operating results. These impairments, where applicable, would reverse in the event of a
recovery to fair value at a later date.



Any future and sustained period of weakness
in oil and gas prices would also have an adverse effect on Compton’s capacity to borrow funds. The Corporation’s secured
Credit Facilities are based upon the lenders’ estimate of the value of the Corporation’s proved reserves, which determines
the borrowing amount. A reduction in the quantity or value of reserves may also obligate Compton to make additional payments under
the processing agreement with MPP.



Any decline in the Corporation’s ability
to market production could have a material adverse effect on production levels or on the sale price received for production. Compton’s
ability to market the oil and gas from the Corporation’s wells depends on numerous factors beyond the Corporation’s
control, including the availability and capacity of gas gathering systems, pipelines and processing facilities, and their proximity
to the wells. The Corporation will be impacted by Canadian federal and provincial, as well as U.S. federal and state, energy policies,
taxes, regulation of oil and gas production, processing, and transportation, as well as Canadian federal regulation of oil and
gas sold or transported outside of the province of Alberta.



Need to Replace Reserves



Compton’s future success depends upon
the Corporation’s ability to find, develop, or acquire additional oil and gas reserves that are economically recoverable.
Without successful exploration, development, exploitation, or acquisition activities, the Corporation’s reserves will deplete
and, as a consequence, either production or the average life of reserves will decline. If future production declines to the extent
that cash flow becomes insufficient to fund capital expenditures, and external sources of capital become limited or unavailable,
the Corporation’s ability to make the necessary capital expenditures to maintain and expand its oil and gas reserves will
be impaired. Compton cannot guarantee that it will be able to find and develop or acquire additional reserves at an acceptable
cost.



Management will continue to evaluate prospects
on an ongoing basis in a manner consistent with industry standards and past practices. The long-term commercial success of the
Corporation depends on its ability to find, acquire, develop, and commercially produce oil and gas reserves. No assurance can be
given that Compton will be able to locate satisfactory properties for acquisition or participation. Moreover, if such acquisitions
or participations are identified, the Corporation may determine that current markets, terms of acquisition and participation, or
pricing conditions make such acquisitions or participations uneconomic.



Compton’s strategies to minimize this
inherent risk include focusing on selected core areas in Western Canada with high working interests and assuming operatorship of
key facilities. The Corporation utilizes a team of highly qualified professionals with expertise and experience in these areas.
Compton assesses strategic acquisitions to complement existing activities while striving for a balance between exploration and
lower risk development and exploitation prospects.



Uncertainty of Reserve Estimates



Estimates of oil and gas reserves and the future
net cash flow therefrom, involve a great deal of uncertainty because they depend upon the reliability of available geologic and
engineering data, which is inherently imprecise. Geologic and engineering data are used to determine the probability that an oil
and gas reservoir exists at a particular location and whether oil and gas are recoverable from the reservoir. The probability of
the existence and recoverability of reserves is less than 100% and actual recoveries of proved reserves may be materially different
from estimates.



- 22 -







Estimates of oil and gas reserves require numerous
assumptions relating to operating conditions and economic factors, including future oil and gas prices, availability of investment
capital, recovery costs, the availability of enhanced recovery techniques, the ability to market production, and governmental and
other regulatory factors, such as taxes, royalty rates, and environmental laws. A change in one or more of these factors could
result in known quantities of oil and gas previously estimated as proved reserves becoming unrecoverable. Each of these factors
also impact recovery costs and production rates, and therefore, will reduce the present value of future net cash flows from estimated
reserves.



In addition, estimates of reserves, and future
net cash flows expected therefrom, that are prepared by different independent engineers or by the same engineers at different times,
may vary substantially.



Difference in Reserves Reporting Practices between Canada and
the United States



Compton reports its production and reserve quantities
in accordance with Canadian practices and specifically in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 – Standards of Disclosure
for Oil and Gas Activities. These practices are different from the practices used to report production and to estimate reserves
in reports and other materials filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) by
companies in the United States.



The Corporation incorporates additional information
with respect to production and reserves which is either not generally included or prohibited under rules of the SEC and practices
in the United States. Compton follows the Canadian practice of reporting gross production and reserve volumes; however, it also
follows the United States practice of separately reporting these volumes on a net basis (after the deduction of royalties and similar
payments). The Corporation also follows the Canadian practice of using forecast prices and costs when it estimates its reserves.
However, Compton separately estimates its reserves using prices and costs held constant at the effective date of the reserve report
in accordance with the Canadian reserve reporting requirements. These latter requirements are similar to the average constant pricing
reserve methodology utilized in the United States.



Compton has included estimates of proved and
proved plus probable reserves, as well as contingent resources in this AIF. Prior to January 1, 2010, the SEC generally prohibited
the inclusion of estimates of probable and possible reserves and contingent resources in filings made with it by United States
oil and gas companies. However, the SEC has adopted revisions to its oil and gas reporting rules that, effective as of January
1, 2010, among other things, modified the standards to establish proved reserves and permit disclosure of probable and possible
reserves under certain circumstances. However, significant differences remain between the reserve categories and reserve reporting
generally under Canadian and U.S. securities laws and rules.



Exploration, Development, and Production
Risks



There are many operating risks and hazards inherent
in exploring for, producing, processing, and transporting oil and gas. Drilling operations may encounter unexpected formations
or pressures that could cause damage to equipment or personal injury and fires, explosions, blowouts, oil spills, or other accidents
may occur. Additionally, Compton could experience interruptions to or the termination of drilling, production, processing, and
transportation activities due to bad weather, natural disasters, delays in obtaining governmental approvals or consents, insufficient
storage or transportation capacity, or other geological and mechanical conditions. Any of these events that result in a shutdown
or slowdown of operations will adversely affect the Corporation’s business. While close well supervision and effective maintenance
operations can contribute to maximizing production rates over time, production delays and declines from normal field operating
conditions cannot be eliminated and can be expected to adversely affect revenue and cash flow levels to varying degrees.



- 23 -







Drilling activities, including completions,
are subject to the risk that no commercially productive reservoirs will be encountered and the Corporation will not recover all
or any portion of its investment. The cost of drilling, completing, and operating wells is often uncertain due to drilling in unknown
formations, the costs associated with encountering various drilling conditions, such as over pressured zones, and changes in drilling
plans and locations as a result of prior exploratory wells or additional seismic data and interpretations thereof.



Insurance



The risks and hazards of Compton’s operations
could result in damage to, or destruction of, oil and gas wells, production and processing facilities, pipelines or other property,
environmental damage, or personal injury for which the Corporation will be liable. The location of operations near populated areas,
including residential areas, commercial business centers, and industrial sites could increase these risks and hazards. The Corporation
cannot fully protect against all of these risks, nor are all of these risks insurable. Compton may become liable for damages arising
from these events against which it cannot insure or against which it may elect not to insure because of high premium costs or other
reasons. The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against could seriously harm Compton’s financial
condition and operating results.



Competition



The oil and gas industry is highly competitive.
The Corporation competes for capital, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands, skilled personnel, access to drilling rigs,
service rigs and other equipment, access to processing facilities, and pipeline and refining capacity with a substantial number
of other organizations, many of which may have greater technical and financial resources than Compton. Some of these organizations
not only explore for, develop and produce oil and gas but also carry on refining operations and market crude oil and other products
on a worldwide basis. As a result of these complementary activities, some competitors may have greater and more diverse competitive
resources to draw on than does Compton.



Availability of Drilling Equipment and Access Restrictions



Compton’s drilling operations could be
curtailed, delayed, or cancelled as a result of access restrictions or shortages or delays in the delivery of equipment and services.
Oil and gas industry operations in the WCSB are affected by road bans imposed from time to time, which can restrict access to well
sites and production facility sites. In addition, landowner constraints or poor surface conditions could disrupt access to the
Corporation’s properties. Compton’s inability to access the Corporation’s properties or to conduct business as
planned could result in a shutdown or slowdown of operations.



Exploration and development activities also
depend on the availability of drilling and related equipment in the particular areas where such activities will be conducted. Increased
demand for that equipment or imposed access restrictions may affect the availability of equipment to the Corporation and may delay
exploration and development activities. In addition, to the extent that Compton is not the operator of transportation facilities
and pipelines, it will be dependent on such operators for the timing of activities related to such properties and will be largely
unable to direct or control the activities of the operators.



- 24 -







Reliance on Key Employees



Compton depends to a large extent on the services
of key management personnel, including the Corporation’s executive officers and other key employees, the loss of any of whom
could have a material adverse effect on operations. The Corporation does not maintain key man life insurance with respect to any
employees. Compton’s success will be dependent upon its ability to continue to employ and retain skilled personnel.



Market Price of the Common Shares



The price of Compton’s Common Shares is
likely to be significantly affected by short-term changes in commodity prices and currency exchange fluctuation. Factors such as
fluctuations in its operating results, the result of any public announcements made by the Corporation, and general market conditions
can also have an adverse effect on the market price of securities. The trading price of Compton’s Common Shares has been
and may continue to be subject to large fluctuations, which may result in losses to investors. The high and low closing sale prices
of Common Shares on the TSX were $2.03 and $0.56 in 2009; $1.11 and $0.39 in 2010; and $18.50 and $0.11 in 2011, respectively.
Note that Compton’s Common Shares underwent a 200:1 share consolidation on August 10, 2011 and the 2011 low closing price
has not been restated to account for this consolidation.



The Corporation delisted from the NYSE on June
24, 2010. The high and low closing sale prices of Common Shares on the NYSE were US$1.75 and US$0.44 in 2009; and $1.16 and $0.609
in the period prior to delisting in 2010, respectively.



Potential Dilution



Management continually evaluates acquisition
opportunities and recapitalization transactions, and although the Corporation is not currently party to any definitive agreements
in respect of such transactions, it may engage in transactions that result in the issuance of additional Common Shares, which issuances
may be dilutive. In the third quarter of 2011, the Corporation issued approximately 3.7 million Cashless Warrants in connection
with the 2011 Recapitalization. Other issuances of additional Common Shares may also result in dilution to the holders of the Common
Shares.



Changes to the Alberta Royalty Regime



On January 1, 2009 the Mines and Minerals
(New Royalty Framework) Amendment Act, 2008 became law in Alberta. This legislation implemented a new royalty framework
(the “New Royalty Framework”) that involves an increase in the royalties collected by the Alberta government
and changes the royalty structure for natural gas and conventional oil by adjusting the current sliding rate formulae that are
price and volume sensitive. On November 19, 2008, the government of Alberta announced that it will provide companies with a one-time
option to select new transitional royalty rates, on a well-by-well basis, to companies that are drilling new natural gas or conventional
oil wells (between 1,000 and 3,500 metres deep) after January 1, 2009. All wells that are drilled between 2009 and the end
of 2013 that adopt the transitional rates will be required to shift to the New Royalty Framework on January 1, 2014. All current
wells moved to the New Royalty Framework on January 1, 2009.



In addition, on March 3, 2009, the Alberta government
announced an incentive program to encourage additional activity in the province’s oil and gas sectors. The program applies
to wells drilled between April 1, 2009 and March 31, 2010 and provided (i) a $200 per metre royalty credit for new wells and (ii)
a maximum royalty rate of 5% on such wells for the first 12 months of production up to a maximum of 50,000 barrels of oil or 500
million cubic feet of natural gas. This program will be in effect until March 31, 2011 and will be assessed as required as to whether
it is necessary or appropriate to continue it. It is expected that the program will have the effect of reducing Compton’s
royalties but the magnitude of this reduction is unknown. Given the recent changes to Alberta’s royalty regime, it is not
possible to predict if and when any future changes may occur.



- 25 -







On March 11, 2010, the Alberta government announced
the outcome of the Competitiveness Review. The outcome was that the maximum royalty rate for conventional oil was reduced to 40%,
and the maximum for natural gas was reduced to 36% effective January 2011. The quantity component remains the same but there were
changes to the price component to moderate the increase in the rate at prices higher than $5.25/GJ for gas and $535.00/m3 for oil.
With lower gas commodity prices during 2011 and forecast into 2012, the outcome of these royalty changes are expected to be minimal
for the Corporation.



Environmental Risks



The Corporation is not fully insured against
certain environmental risks, either because such insurance is not available or because of high premium costs. In particular, insurance
against risks from environmental pollution occurring over time, as opposed to sudden and catastrophic damages, is not available
on economically reasonable terms. Accordingly, Compton’s properties may be subject to liability due to hazards that cannot
be insured against or that have not been insured against due to prohibitive premium costs or for other reasons.



Compton is committed to minimizing any potential
impact on the environment by ensuring its operations are performed at a high standard. As such, the Corporation’s regulatory
compliance is above industry average and it has not experienced any material non-compliance actions. In addition, there are no
reputational issues or litigation from environmental damage.



Trends and Uncertainties



The oil and gas industry is subject to extensive
environmental laws and regulations pursuant to local, provincial, and federal legislation. Compliance with any new legislation
may require significant expenditures and a failure to comply may result in the issuance of shut-in or closure orders or the imposition
of fines and penalties, some of which may be material. It is possible that the costs of complying with environmental regulations
in the future will have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition. Furthermore, future changes in
environmental laws and regulations, including adoption of stricter standards or more stringent enforcement, could result in increased
costs, incurred liability, and increased capital expenditures and operating costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect
on Compton’s financial condition.



As Compton’s production facilities and
other operations and activities emit greenhouse gases, the Corporation may be subject to emissions targets and may subject the
Corporation to legislation that will require increasingly strict regulation with respect to the emissions of greenhouse gases.
The regulatory uncertainty around climate change legislation continues in Canada. Currently, the Alberta Regulatory Effectiveness
Project is being debated at the Ministerial level and the changes contemplated could significantly alter the regulatory regime
in Alberta. Nevertheless, if the objects of the project are met and there is improved effectiveness and efficiency, the industry
as a whole should see some financial benefits from these actions. Compton views these potential changes as being positive for continued
operations and development in its key operating areas in Alberta.



Given the evolving nature of climate change
action and regulation, it is not possible to predict the nature of future legislation with respect to climate change or the impact
on the Corporation, its operations and financial condition at this time.



- 26 -







Environmental Liabilities



Environmental regulation provides for, among
other things, restrictions and prohibitions on the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal of hazardous
substances and waste from spills, releases, or emissions of various substances produced in association with oil and gas operations.
The legislation also requires that wells, facility sites, and other properties associated with the Corporation’s operations
be operated, maintained, abandoned, and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities. Under environmental
legislation, Compton may be liable for personal injury, clean-up costs, remedial measures, and other environmental and property
damages, as well as administrative, civil, and criminal penalties.



There have been no significant environmental
spills, releases or incidents with any material financial impact, no legal actions due to any environmental or safety events or
incidents and no known material environmental contamination associated with historical practices or operations. However, as part
of Compton’s reclamation and abandonment program, new sites will continue to be investigated which could result in an identified
contaminated site in the future.



Asset Retirement Obligations(“ARO”)



Compton has not established a separate reclamation
fund for the purpose of funding estimated future environmental and reclamation obligations. Any site reclamation or abandonment
costs incurred in the ordinary course in a specific period will be funded out of cash flow from operations. It is not possible
to predict Compton’s ability to fully fund the cost of all its future environmental, abandonment and reclamation obligations.



Compton does expect to incur site restoration
costs over a prolonged period as wells reach the end of their economic life. Compton provides for future abandonment and reclamation
costs in its financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The quantitative assessment
along with qualitative discussion in respect to environmental protection requirements, policies and costs can be found in “Statement
of Reserves Data – Additional Information Concerning Abandonment and Reclamation Costs” in this AIF.



There are significant uncertainties related to
AROs and the impact on the financial statements could be material. The eventual timing of and costs for these AROs could differ
from current estimates. The main factors that can cause expected cash flows to change are:



| | · | changes to laws and legislation;
| | - | --------------------------------



| | · | construction of new facilities;
| | - | -------------------------------



| | · | change in the reserve estimate and the
resulting amendment to the life of the reserves; and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | changes in technology.
| | - | ----------------------



STATEMENT OF RESERVES DATA



Compton’s interests in 100% of the Corporation’s
natural gas and crude oil properties have been evaluated in a report (the “Reserves Report”) as of December 31,
2011, prepared by the independent international integrated petroleum engineering and geological firm, GLJ Petroleum Consultants
Ltd. (“GLJ”). The following summary of the Corporation’s reserves is calculated and reported in accordance
with National Instrument 51-101, “Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities”. Assumptions and qualifications
relating to costs, prices for future production, and other matters are included below. The Reserves Report is based on data supplied
by the Corporation and on GLJ’s opinions of reasonable practice in the industry.



- 27 -







All evaluations of future net revenue are after
the deduction of future income tax expenses (unless otherwise noted in the tables), royalties, development costs, production costs,
and well abandonment costs, but before consideration of indirect costs such as administrative, overhead, and other miscellaneous
expenses. The estimated future net revenue contained in the following tables does not necessarily represent the fair market value
of Compton’s reserves. There is no assurance that the forecast price and cost assumptions contained in the Reserves Report
will be attained and variances could be material. Other assumptions and qualifications relating to costs and other matters are
summarized in the notes to the following tables. The recovery and reserves estimates on Compton’s properties described herein
are estimates only. The actual reserves on Compton’s properties may be greater or less than those calculated and these variances
may be material. Compton has no heavy oil reserves and “crude oil” refers to light and medium crude oil only.



This statement is dated March 7, 2011. The information
being provided in this statement has an effective date of December 31, 2011 and a preparation date of February 6, 2012.



The Report on Reserves Data by Compton’s
independent qualified reserves evaluators in Form 51-101F2 and the Report of Management and Directors on Oil and Gas Disclosure
in Form 51-101F3 are attached hereto as Schedule “A” and “B” respectively.



Reserves Volumes and Values Based on Forecast
Prices and Costs



A summary of the Corporation’s reserves
by product type based upon forecast price and cost assumptions, before and after applicable royalties, at the end of the most recent
fiscal year, is presented below.



Summary of Oil and Gas Reserves Using Forecast Pricing
as of December 31, 2011







|                           | Crude Oil | Natural Gas(2) | Ngls    | Total  
|-------------------------- | --------- | -------------- | ------- | -------
|                           | Gross     | Net            | Gross   | Net    
|Reserves Category(1)       | (Mbbl)    | (Mbbl)         | (MMcf)  | (MMcf) 
|Proved                     |           |                |         |        
|Developed producing        | 1,818     | 1,300          | 195,619 | 162,620
|Developed non-producing    | 137       | 109            | 14,390  | 12,019 
|Undeveloped                | 279       | 223            | 50,462  | 43,155 
|Total proved               | 2,234     | 1,631          | 260,471 | 217,794
|Probable                   | 877       | 635            | 130,649 | 109,488
|Total proved plus probable | 3,111     | 2,265          | 391,120 | 327,281

| | (1) | Numbers may not add due to rounding.
| | --- | ------------------------------------

| | (2) | The solution and associated gas represents less than 3% of the Corporation’s proved plus
probable natural gas reserves and is therefore considered immaterial and is not described separately.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







- 28 -







The tables set forth below summarize the Corporation’s
future net revenue as of December 31, 2011, based on forecast prices and cost assumptions.



Summary of Future Net Revenue as of December 31, 2011
(Forecast Prices)



|                           | Future Net Revenue ($000s)
        Before Income Taxes Discounted at (%/year)
|-------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Reserves Category(1)       | 0%                                                                           
|Proved                     |                                                                              
|Developed producing        | $     862,208                                                                
|Developed non-producing    | 52,172                                                                       
|Undeveloped                | 166,974                                                                      
|Total proved               | $  1,081,355                                                                 
|Probable                   | 595,297                                                                      
|Total proved plus probable | $  1,676,652                                                                 



| | (1) | Numbers may not add due to rounding.
| | --- | ------------------------------------

| | (2) | Includes, at minimum, well abandonment costs (rather than total abandonment and reclamation costs).
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           | Future Net Revenue ($000s)
        After Income Taxes Discounted at (%/year)
|-------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Reserves Category (1)      | 0%                                                                          
|Proved                     |                                                                             
|Developed producing        | $     769,562                                                               
|Developed non-producing    | 39,007                                                                      
|Undeveloped                | 125,178                                                                     
|Total proved               | $     933,747                                                               
|Probable                   | 444,964                                                                     
|Total proved plus probable | $  1,378,711                                                                

| | (1) | Numbers may not add due to rounding.
| | --- | ------------------------------------



Undiscounted total future net revenue calculated
using forecast prices and costs incorporates the elements presented in the table below.



Total Future Net Revenue (Undiscounted) as of December
31, 2011 (Forecast Prices)

|Reserves
Category(1) | Revenue   | Royalties | Operating Costs | Develop- ment Costs | Well
Abandon-
ment
Costs(2) | Future Net Revenue Before Income Taxes | Income Taxes | Future Net Revenue After Income Taxes
|-------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------------- | ------------------- | --------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | ------------ | -------------------------------------
|                     | ($000s)   | ($000s)   | ($000s)         | ($000s)             | ($000s)                     | ($000s)                                | ($000s)      | ($000s)                              
|Proved               | 2,626,384 | 482,644   | 857,783         | 162,496             | 42,106                      | 1,081,355                              | 147,608      | 933,747                              
|Proved plus probable | 4,067,684 | 750,363   | 1,276,732       | 311,872             | 52,065                      | 1,676,652                              | 297,941      | 1,378,711                            

| | (1) | Numbers may not add due to rounding.
| | --- | ------------------------------------

| | (2) | Includes, at minimum, well abandonment costs (rather than total abandonment and reclamation costs).
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 29 -







The following table summarizes the Corporation’s
total future net revenue using forecast price and cost assumptions, before income taxes, by production group.



Total Future Net Revenue by Production Group as of December
31, 2011 (Forecast Prices)



|                     | Future Net Revenue Before Income Taxes (discounted at 10%/year) | Unit Value(3)
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------
|Reserves Category    | Production Group                                                | ($000s)      
|Proved               | Light & medium oil(1)                                           | 58,994       
|                     | Heavy oil(1)                                                    | 364          
|                     | Natural gas(2)                                                  | 395,689      
|                     | Natural gas - CBM                                               | 6,337        
|                     | Total                                                           | 461,384      
|Proved plus probable | Light & medium oil(1)                                           | 73,458       
|                     | Heavy oil(1)                                                    | 435          
|                     | Natural gas(2)                                                  | 533,900      
|                     | Natural gas - CBM                                               | 8,149        
|                     | Total                                                           | 615,942      

| | (1) | Includes solution gas and other by-products.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------

| | (2) | Includes by-products but excluding solution gas.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------

| | (3) | Unit values are based on net reserves.
| | --- | --------------------------------------



Pricing Assumptions



Future net revenue calculated using forecast
prices and costs is based upon the price assumptions set out below. GLJ’s January 1, 2012 price deck was used in estimating
Compton’s reserve data as at December 31, 2011.



Summary of Forecast Pricing and Inflation
Rate Assumptions as of January 1, 2011

|            | Crude Oil                      | Natural Gas                     | NGLS                     | Sulphur                     | Inflation
Rate(1)          | Exchange Rate                
|----------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------------------------- | -------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Year        | WTI Cushing Oklahoma ($US/bbl) | Edmonton Par 40° API ($Cdn/bbl) | AECO C Spot ($Cdn/MMbtu) | Edmonton Propane ($Cdn/bbl) | Edmonton Butane ($Cdn/bbl) | Edmonton Pentanes+ ($Cdn/bbl)
|Forecast    |                                |                                 |                          |                             |                            |                              
|2012        | 97.00                          | 97.96                           | 3.29                     | 58.78                       | 76.41                      | 107.76                       
|2013        | 100.00                         | 101.02                          | 3.93                     | 60.61                       | 78.80                      | 108.09                       
|2014        | 100.00                         | 101.02                          | 4.39                     | 60.61                       | 78.80                      | 105.06                       
|2015        | 100.00                         | 101.02                          | 4.84                     | 60.61                       | 78.80                      | 105.06                       
|2016        | 100.00                         | 101.02                          | 5.30                     | 60.61                       | 78.80                      | 105.06                       
|2017        | 100.00                         | 101.02                          | 5.75                     | 60.61                       | 78.80                      | 105.06                       
|2018        | 101.35                         | 102.40                          | 5.99                     | 64.44                       | 79.87                      | 106.49                       
|2019        | 103.38                         | 104.47                          | 6.11                     | 62.68                       | 81.49                      | 108.65                       
|2020        | 105.45                         | 106.58                          | 6.23                     | 63.95                       | 83.13                      | 110.84                       
|2021        | 107.56                         | 108.73                          | 6.36                     | 65.24                       | 84.81                      | 113.08                       
|There-after | +2.0%/yr                       | +2.0%/yr                        | +2.0%/yr                 | +2.0%/yr                    | +2.0%/yr                   | +2.0%/yr                     
|            |                                |                                 |                          |                             |                            |                              





| | (1) | Inflation rate for operating and capital costs.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------



The weighted average realized sales price for
Compton for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $3.92/Mcf for natural gas, $89.34/bbl for crude oil, $77.60/bbl for ngls, and
$59.78/lt for sulphur.



- 30 -







Reserves Reconciliation



The following table provides a summary of the
changes in the Corporation’s reserves which occurred in the most recent fiscal year, based upon forecast price and cost assumptions.



Reconciliation of Gross Reserves by Product Type Using
Forecast Prices and Costs(1)



|                               | Crude Oil           | Natural Gas          
|------------------------------ | ------------------- | ---------------------
|                               | Gross Proved (Mbbl) | Gross Probable (Mbbl)
|December 31, 2010              | 1,988               | 631                  
|Extensions & improved recovery | 259                 | 303                  
|Technical revisions            | 288                 | (53)                 
|Discoveries                    | -                   | -                    
|Acquisitions                   | -                   | -                    
|Dispositions                   | -                   | -                    
|Economic                       | (12)                | (3)                  
|Production                     | (290)               | -                    
|December 31, 2011              | 2,234               | 878                  

| | (1) | Prepared by Management. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | Further explanation regarding the technical revisions may be found in the Company’s reserve
news release dated March 7, 2012.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                               | Ngls                | Total Reserves       
|------------------------------ | ------------------- | ---------------------
|                               | Gross Proved (Mbbl) | Gross Probable (Mbbl)
|December 31, 2010              | 5,427               | 2,587                
|Extensions & improved recovery | 222                 | 32                   
|Technical revisions            | 93                  | 33                   
|Discoveries                    | -                   | -                    
|Acquisitions                   | -                   | -                    
|Dispositions                   | -                   | (49)                 
|Economic                       | (53)                | 27                   
|Production                     | (444)               | -                    
|December 31, 2011              | 5,244               | 2,630                

| | (1) | Prepared by Management. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | Further explanation regarding the technical revisions may be found in the Company’s reserve
news release dated March 7, 2012.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Additional Information Relating to Reserves Data



Undeveloped Reserves Attributed in Current Year



The following discussion generally describes
the basis on which Compton attributes proved and probable undeveloped reserves and its plans for developing those undeveloped reserves.



Undeveloped reserves are those reserves expected
to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (such as the cost of drilling a well) is required to render
them capable of production. They must fully meet the requirements of the reserves category (proved or probable) to which they are
assigned.



- 31 -







| | i) | Proved Undeveloped Reserves
| | -- | ---------------------------



Proved undeveloped reserves are generally those
reserves related to wells that have been tested and not yet tied-in, wells drilled near the end of the fiscal year, or wells further
away from the Corporation’s gathering systems. In addition, such reserves may relate to planned infill drilling locations.
The majority of these reserves are planned to be in production within a five-year timeframe.



The following table summarizes the Corporation’s
proved undeveloped reserves that were first attributed in each of the first three financial years and, in aggregate, before that
time using forecast price and cost assumptions by production type.



|              | Total Proved Undeveloped
|------------- | ------------------------
|Year          | Crude Oil (Mbbl)        
|2011          | 73                      
|2010          | 164                     
|2009          | -                       
|2008 & before | 54                      



| | (1) | First Attributed refers to reserves first attributed
at year-end of the corresponding fiscal year.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii) | Probable Undeveloped Reserves
| | --- | -----------------------------



Probable undeveloped reserves are generally
those reserves tested or indicated by analogy to be productive infill drilling locations and lands contiguous to production. The
majority of these reserves are planned to be in production by the end of 2015.



The following table summarizes the Corporation’s
probable undeveloped reserves that were first attributed in each of the first three financial years and, in aggregate before that
time using forecast price and cost assumptions by production type.



|              | Total Probable Undeveloped
|------------- | --------------------------
|Year          | Crude Oil (Mbbl)          
|2011          | 221                       
|2010          | 82                        
|2009          | -                         
|2008 & before | 1,459                     

| | (1) | First Attributed refers to reserves first attributed
at year-end of the corresponding fiscal year.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Significant Factors or Uncertainties Affecting Reserves Data



The process of estimating reserves is complex.
Although every reasonable effort is made to ensure that reserve estimates are accurate, reserve estimation is an inferential science.
It requires significant judgments and decisions based on available geological, geophysical, engineering, and economic data. These
estimates may change substantially as additional data from ongoing development activities and production performance becomes available
and as economic conditions impacting oil and natural gas prices and costs change. Estimates are reviewed and revised, either upward
or downward, as warranted by the new information.



- 32 -







The reserve estimates contained herein are based
on current production forecasts, prices, and economic conditions. Compton’s reserves are evaluated by GLJ.



Future Development Costs



The following table provides a summary of the
development costs deducted in the estimation of future net revenue attributable to each of the reserves categories set out below:



Development Costs Deducted in Estimating Future Net Revenues(1)



|                                | Proved                                 | Proved Plus Probable                  
|------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------
|Year                            | Forecast Prices and Costs/Year ($000s) | Forecast Prices and Costs/Year ($000s)
|Undiscounted                    |                                        |                                       
|2012                            | 31,409                                 | 56,241                                
|2013                            | 55,437                                 | 84,768                                
|2014                            | 55,216                                 | 108,509                               
|2015                            | 10,754                                 | 41,617                                
|2016                            | 3,235                                  | 12,932                                
|Remaining                       | 6,445                                  | 7,805                                 
|Total undiscounted              | 162,496                                | 311,872                               
|Total discounted @ 10% per year | 133,010                                | 252,920                               

| | (1) | Includes abandonment costs. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------



Based on forecast prices, Compton estimates
that its internally generated cash flow will be sufficient to fund the future development costs disclosed above. Should the Corporation
decide to accelerate its capital expenditure program, other sources of funding would need to be considered such as proceeds from:
(i) asset dispositions; (ii) farm-outs of existing lands; (iii) strategic alliances; (iv) debt financing when appropriate; and
(v) new equity issues. Compton does not expect that the costs of funding its capital expenditures will have a material effect on
the economics of the programs.





OTHER OIL AND GAS INFORMATION



Oil and Gas Properties and Wells



The following table summarizes the location
of the Corporation’s interests as at December 31, 2011 in crude oil and natural gas wells that are producing or that
the Corporation considers to be capable of production.



- 33 -







|Area            | Producing Crude Oil Wells | Non-producing
Crude Oil
Wells(2) | Producing Natural Gas Wells | Non-producing
Natural Gas
Wells(2) | Total Wells
|--------------- | ------------------------- | -------------------------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | -----------
|                | Gross                     | Net                              | Gross                       | Net                                | Gross      
|Alberta         |                           |                                  |                             |                                    |            
|Niton(3)        | 27                        | 23                               | 6                           | 6                                  | 116        
|High River      | 3                         | 3                                | -                           | -                                  | 116        
|Southern Plains | 28                        | 17                               | 4                           | 3                                  | 686        
|Foothills(4)    | -                         | -                                | 1                           | 1                                  | 26         
|Other           | 8                         | 3                                | -                           | -                                  | 121        
|Total wells     | 66                        | 46                               | 11                          | 10                                 | 1,065      





| | (1) | Numbers may not add due to rounding.
| | --- | ------------------------------------

| | (2) | A portion of the non-producing wells are wells considered capable of production but which, for
a variety of reasons including but not limited to a lack of markets and lack of development, cannot be placed on production at
the present time.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (3) | Includes Bigoray properties.
| | --- | ----------------------------

| | (4) | Callum, Cowley and Todd Creek properties.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------





Compton has high working interest and operatorship
in its properties. As a result, the Corporation has ownership in its substantial established infrastructure, which allows flexibility
to effectively manage area development and adjust operations accordingly. Key properties are described in “Principal Properties
– Description of the Business”. Overall, Compton operates over 50,000 horsepower (“hp”) of compression
totalling 200 MMcf/d of available field compression capacity, with over 85 MMcf/d of operated processing capacity with no mid-stream
requirements (not including the Mazeppa Gas Processing Plant), and over 2,000 km of pipeline infrastructure in place. Key facilities
are as follows:



| | · | Mazeppa Gas Processing Plant:
Compton provides the Management team and corporate guidance for the Mazeppa Processing Partnership, owned by Enstar (see “Description
of the Business – Mazeppa Processing Partnership”). This sour gas processing plant is located in the High River area
at 2-35-19-28 W4M and currently has production capacity of 90 MMcf/d (licensed plant capacity) of sour natural gas and 45 MMcf/d
of sweet natural gas.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | High River: In the High River
area there is 9,150 hp installed with a gas compression capacity of 42.5 MMcf/d and 270 km of pipeline infrastructure in place.
Volumes are all produced to the Mazeppa gas gathering system and sour gas processing plant.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Southern Alberta Foothills:
The Callum and Cowley Gas Processing Plants with 100% plant ownership are currently capable of compressing 19 MMcf/d and ultimately
processing 50 MMcf/d through the two existing facilities with the addition of field and/or plant compression. There is currently
over 60 km of pipeline infrastructure in the operating area with minimal third party infrastructure in place.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Bigoray and Pembina: This
is Compton’s primary oil production property. Facilities consist of satellites, water injection facilities, and associated
oil batteries. There is over 110 km of pipeline infrastructure in place in this operational area.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Edson, Niton, and McLeod:
This foothills area property has compression capacity of 23 MMcf/d utilizing over 6,400 hp, including the Compton McLeod River
Gas Processing Plant with 23 MMcf/d of capacity with 100% plant ownership. Additionally, there is over 185 km of pipeline infrastructure
in the area.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 34 -







| | · | Shallow Gas Properties: Compton’s
shallow gas infrastructure consists of over 110 MMcf/d of compression capacity utilizing 30,000 hp with over 1,200 km of pipeline
infrastructure in place. Final processing gas volumes are through a third party in some cases, but in many cases directly linked
into the ATCO and Nova/TransCanada pipeline systems at multiple sales locations.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Compton’s wells to which reserves have
been attributed and which are capable of producing but are not currently producing are provided in the table below, including the
year in which they were designated this capacity. These wells are not producing for a number of reasons. There are a number of
wells that are not tied-in due to surface issues with landowners. In addition, a number of wells are currently not economic to
tie-in due to proximity of pipelines. Once prices improve, these wells can be tied-in.



|      | Proven Developed Non-Producing Wells
|----- | ------------------------------------
|      | Gas Wells                           
|Year  | Gross (100%)                        
|2005  | 12                                  
|2006  | 12                                  
|2007  | 10                                  
|2008  | 41                                  
|2009  | 14                                  
|2010  | 41                                  
|2011  | 6                                   
|Total | 136                                 



Properties with No Attributed Reserves



The following table sets forth the Corporation’s
undeveloped land holdings to which no proved reserves have been attributed as at December 31, 2011.



|Area            | Gross Acres | Net Acres
|--------------- | ----------- | ---------
|Alberta         |             |          
|Niton           | 45,064      | 36,195   
|Southern Plains | 87,931      | 28,468   
|High River      | 31,654      | 76,399   
|Foothills(1)    | 62,686      | 50,555   
|Montana(2)      | 93,751      | 79,083   
|Other           | 1,918       | 1,918    
|Total(3)        | 323,004     | 272,618  



| | (1) | Callum, Cowley and Todd Creek properties.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------



| | (2) | Net acreage is net after royalty in the United States.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------

| | (3) | Total land overstated due to multiple zones overlapping leases on various sections.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Compton expects that the rights to explore,
develop and exploit approximately 20,148 net acres of undeveloped land may expire by December 31, 2012. Total land decreased
from 2010 levels due to land expiries in areas viewed as less prospective by the Corporation. There are no material work commitments
associated with the Corporation’s expiring undeveloped land holdings.



- 35 -







Compton holds interests in different formations
under the same surface area pursuant to separate leases. The acreage is reported at the lease level, meaning formations held by
separate leases under the same surface area are calculated separately to give gross and net acres.



Significant Factors or Uncertainties Relevant to Properties
with No Attributed Reserves



There are various factors or uncertainties that
could affect the anticipated development or production activities on properties with no attributed reserves. They include:



| | · | Commodity Prices: The Corporation’s
financial condition is substantially dependent on, and highly sensitive to, oil and gas commodity prices. Lower commodity prices
could change the economics of wells, which would affect the decision to develop certain areas.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Availability of Capital:
Any material decline in prices could result in a material reduction of Compton’s cash flow, and hence, availability of capital
for development.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Drilling Success Rate: As
the Corporation expands its developed lands, future drilling is dependent upon the success rate of nearby wells.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Potential Development and Operating
Costs: The amount of capital required to develop, operate and bring to market new areas will determine the economics and
feasibility of the prospect.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Forward Contracts



In 2011, Compton’s realized average field
price was $32.84/boe, comprised of $3.92/Mcf for natural gas and $80.39/bbl for liquids. In 2010, Compton’s realized average
field price was $32.87/boe, comprised of $4.43/Mcf for natural gas and $65.71/bbl for liquids.



Compton’s natural gas production is sold
to credit worthy counterparties under contracts between AECO Daily Index price sales and AECO Monthly Index price sales, with transactions
at Nova Inventory Transfer. A small portion (3%) of the sales portfolio is dedicated to aggregator pools under pricing that reflects
the AECO Indices. Natural gas is transported through regulated pipelines in the Province of Alberta at tariffs which require either
Provincial or Federal regulatory approval.



Compton’s crude oil sales are priced at
market using Edmonton postings as a benchmark and are typically 30-day evergreen contracts. Natural gas liquids are re-priced on
an annual basis with respect to product premiums with the base price for each component reflecting posted prices. Crude oil and
NGLs are transported to the point of sale to credit worthy counterparties using a combination of pipelines and trucking services.



From time to time, Compton may enter into hedging
arrangements to mitigate commodity price risk and take advantage of opportunistic pricing. Compton’s risk management policy
provides comprehensive guidance that allows Management to enter into hedging transactions that mitigate risk from commodity prices,
interest rates, foreign exchange rates and electricity prices. The policy specifically prohibits speculative hedging and sets limits
on the volume and length of hedging contracts. The hedging policy provides for hedging of up to 50% of gross budgeted volumes for
any particular quarter for a period up to 24 months from the day they are entered into.



- 36 -







Additional Information Concerning Abandonment and Reclamation
Costs



Compton is required to remove production equipment,
batteries, pipelines, and natural gas plants and to restore land at the end of oil and natural gas operations. The Corporation
estimates these costs in accordance with existing laws, contracts, and other policies. These obligations are initially measured
at fair value, which is the discounted future value of the liability. This fair value is also capitalized as part of the cost of
the related assets and amortized over the useful life of the assets.



ARO cost calculations were derived from a combination
of ERCB cost models, and typical industry experience and practices. The ARO process was reviewed, modified and reassessed throughout
each quarter of 2010. Compton continues to evaluate the appropriate costs for both abandonment and reclamation based on industry
standard cost calculations versus the Corporation’s expenditures. An ongoing asset inventory of all of Compton’s wells,
pipelines and facilities is maintained and updated on a quarterly basis.



The deemed ARO liability for Compton’s
well sites and facilities is the sum of the calculated abandonment and reclamation liabilities adjusted for designated status as
an active, inactive, abandoned, or problem site. Information regarding environmental remediation costs and other liability issues
for site specific concerns were derived from a review of historical audit and assessment reports of sites and facilities. An inflation
rate of 2% and a risk free rate ranging from 1.3% to 2.5% was used in the fair value calculation. Total asset retirement costs
are estimated to be $251.7 million or $162.9 million when discounted , including the Mazeppa Processing Plant. The Corporation
expects to pay approximately $32 million dollars in ARO costs between 2012 and 2016, which includes environmental and well abandonment
costs.



Financial and Operations Effects of Environmental
Protection Requirements



At present, the Corporation believes that it
meets all existing environmental standards and regulations and includes appropriate amounts for environmental, health and safety
costs in its annual capital and operating expenditure budget to continue to meet current environmental protection requirements.
The Corporation does not anticipate making extraordinary material expenditures for environmental compliance during 2012. Total
environmental expenditures for 2012 are expected to be approximately $2.0 million.



Tax Horizon



Compton has approximately $498.7 million in
tax pools to apply against taxable income. Based upon planned capital expenditure programs and current commodity price assumptions,
it is anticipated the Corporation will not be cash taxable for a significant period of time.



Capital Expenditures



In 2011, Compton incurred approximately $50.5
million of capital costs in total (excluding asset retirement costs, acquisitions and divestitures): $7.5 million in exploration
costs and $43.0 million in development costs. In addition, approximately $26.3 million was received from property dispositions.



- 37 -







Exploration and Development Activities



The following table sets forth the number of
crude oil and natural gas wells drilled by the Corporation, or which the Corporation participated in drilling, that are capable
of production, as well as the number of dry and abandoned wells, all expressed in terms of gross and net wells during the years
ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.



|                  | Year Ended December 31, 2010 |             | Year Ended December 31, 2010
|----------------- | ---------------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------
|                  | Development                  | Exploratory |                             
|                  | Gross                        | Net         | Gross                       
|Natural gas       | 4                            | 3.2         | 1                           
|Crude oil         | 3                            | 2.5         | -                           
|Service wells     | -                            | -           | -                           
|Standing wells(1) | 2                            | 1.4         | -                           
|Dry and abandoned | -                            | -           | -                           
|Total             | 9                            | 7.1         | 1                           
|Success Ratio(2)  | 100%                         |             | 80%                         

| | (1) | Standing wells are wells drilled and cased that have results pending.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | Excludes standing wells.
| | --- | ------------------------



In 2012, the Corporation expects to continue
to focus the majority of its resources in Alberta, Canada. Compton’s overall objective for 2012 is to focus primarily on
development activities and the advancement of reserves from the proved undeveloped and probable categories to the proved producing
classification. The development portfolio will be monitored to live within cash flow and will be adjusted according to results.
In 2012, Compton will focus on the high return, liquids-rich Niton area as well as its emerging oil opportunities in Southern Plains,
which provides significant upside potential through its multiple zone development opportunities and contiguous land blocks.



- 38 -







Production History



The Corporation’s average daily production
volume of natural gas and liquids, before deduction of royalties, for each of the periods indicated, is set forth below.



Gross Natural Gas and Liquids Production(1)



|                               | Three Months Ended | Year Ended   
|------------------------------ | ------------------ | -------------
|Product Type                   | March 31,
2011     | June 30, 2011
|Natural gas (MMcf/d)           | 72                 | 65           
|Natural gas (MMcf)             | 6,508              | 5,897        
|                               |                    |              
|Natural gas liquids (boe/d)(2) | 1,542              | 1,218        
|Natural gas liquids (Mboe)(2)  | 138,792            | 110,852      
|                               |                    |              
|Crude oil (bbl/d)              | 913                | 729          
|Crude oil (Mbbls)              | 82,146             | 66,302       
|                               |                    |              
|Total liquids (boe/d)          | 2,455              | 1,947        
|Total liquids (Mboe)           | 220,938            | 177,154      
|                               |                    |              
|Total (boe/d)                  | 14,507             | 12,748       
|Total (Mboe)                   | 1,305,595          | 1,160,052    

| | (1) | Numbers may not add due to rounding.
| | --- | ------------------------------------

| | (2) | Includes sulphur.
| | --- | -----------------



2012 Production Estimates



Company gross production volumes in 2012, as
estimated in the Corporation’s reserve forecast from GLJ before deduction of royalties, are set forth below.



|Reserves Category(1)       | Crude Oil(bbl/d) | Natural Gas (MMcf/d) | Ngls (bbl/d) | Total (boe/d)
|-------------------------- | ---------------- | -------------------- | ------------ | -------------
|Proved                     |                  |                      |              |              
|Developed producing        | 676              | 59,143               | 1,086        | 11,619       
|Developed non-producing    | 129              | 4,309                | 145          | 992          
|Undeveloped                | 88               | 4,081                | 122          | 890          
|Total proved               | 893              | 67,533               | 1,353        | 13,501       
|Probable                   | 144              | 4,144                | 112          | 947          
|Total proved plus probable | 1,038            | 71,677               | 1,465        | 14,448       

| | (1) | Numbers may not add due to rounding. Based on estimates only. Variances may occur due to circumstances
beyond Compton’s control.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 39 -

















The Corporation’s per unit results on
a quarterly basis for the periods indicated is set forth below.



|                               | Three Months Ended     | Year Ended   
|------------------------------ | ---------------------- | -------------
|                               | March 31,
        2011 | June 30, 2011
|Natural gas ($/Mcf)            |                        |              
|Price(2)                       | 4.01                   | 4.10         
|Royalties                      | 0.96                   | 0.64         
|Operating costs(1)             | 1.48                   | 1.72         
|Transportation costs           | 0.11                   | 0.11         
|Netback                        | 1.46                   | 1.63         
|                               |                        |              
|Natural gas liquids ($/bbl)(3) |                        |              
|Price                          | 62.82                  | 79.83        
|Royalties                      | 23.14                  | 32.62        
|Operating costs(1)             | 8.87                   | 10.30        
|Transportation costs           | 2.62                   | 4.75         
|Netback                        | 28.19                  | 32.16        
|                               |                        |              
|Crude oil ($/bbl)              |                        |              
|Price                          | 79.75                  | 102.71       
|Royalties                      | 19.83                  | 30.87        
|Operating costs(1)             | 9.60                   | 14.83        
|Transportation costs           | 2.62                   | 4.75         
|Netback                        | 47.70                  | 52.26        
|                               |                        |              
|Total liquids ($/bbl)          |                        |              
|Price                          | 69.11                  | 88.39        
|Royalties                      | 21.91                  | 31.97        
|Operating costs(1)             | 9.14                   | 11.99        
|Transportation costs           | 2.62                   | 4.75         
|Netback                        | 35.44                  | 39.68        
|                               |                        |              
|Total ($/boe)                  |                        |              
|Price(2)                       | 32.71                  | 35.94        
|Royalties                      | 8.50                   | 8.16         
|Operating costs(1)             | 8.92                   | 10.55        
|Transportation costs           | 1.01                   | 1.30         
|Netback(4)                     | 14.28                  | 15.93        

| | (1) | A portion of Compton’s natural gas production is associated with or crude oil production;
additionally the production of natural gas liquids is associated with natural gas production. As a result, per unit operating costs
for each product line reflect the allocation of certain common costs in this determination.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | Includes third party processing fees,
                                                           but not included in product pricing. Excludes impact of hedging.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (3) | Includes sulphur.
| | --- | -----------------

| | (4) | Excludes impact of hedging on prices.
| | --- | -------------------------------------



- 40 -







The following table indicates average gross
daily production from important areas in respect of Compton’s assets for the year ended December 31, 2011:





|Area            | Crude Oil (Bbls/d) | Natural Gas (Mcf/d) | Ngls
(Bbls/d)(3) | Total (Boe/d)
|--------------- | ------------------ | ------------------- | ---------------- | -------------
|                |                    |                     |                  |              
|Niton(1)        | 444.3              | 17,626.7            | 662.0            | 4,044.1      
|High River      | 9.3                | 17,746.5            | 347.0            | 3,314.1      
|Southern Plains | 312.1              | 22,934.0            | 298.6            | 4,432.9      
|Foothills(2)    | 11.4               | 4,286.3             | 37.9             | 763.7        
|Other           | 16.1               | 4,345.1             | 52.4             | 792.7        
|Total           | 793.2              | 66,938.5            | 1,397.8          | 13,347.5     





| | (1) | Includes Bigoray properties.
| | --- | ----------------------------



| | (2) | Callum, Cowley and Todd Creek properties.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------

| | (3) | Includes sulphur.
| | --- | -----------------

| | (4) | Numbers may not add due to rounding.
| | --- | ------------------------------------



DIVIDENDS



The Corporation has neither declared nor paid
any dividends on its Common Shares. The Corporation intends to retain its earnings to finance growth and expand its operations
and does not anticipate paying any dividends on its Common Shares in the foreseeable future.



CAPITAL STRUCTURE



Compton is authorized to issue an unlimited
number of common shares and an unlimited number of preferred shares, of which 26,358,528 Common Shares are issued and outstanding
as fully paid and non-assessable shares as at March 7, 2011. No preferred shares are issued and outstanding as at March 7, 2011.
The Corporation also has 3,690,982 cashless warrants outstanding, which are exercisable until August 23, 2014.The following is a description of the Corporation’s capital structure.



Common Shares



Common Shares have attached to them the following
rights, privileges, restrictions, and conditions: (i) except for meetings at which only holders of another specified class or series
of shares of the Corporation are entitled to vote separately as a class or series, each holder of a Common Share is entitled to
receive notice of, to attend, and to vote at all meetings of the shareholders of the Corporation; (ii) subject to the rights, privileges,
restrictions, and conditions attached to any preferred shares, the holders of Common Shares are entitled to receive dividends if,
and when, declared by the directors of the Corporation; and (iii) subject to the rights, privileges, restrictions, and conditions
attached to any other class of shares of the Corporation, the holders of Common Shares are entitled to share equally in the remaining
property of the Corporation upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up of the Corporation.



Preferred Shares



The preferred shares may be issued in one or
more series, and the directors are authorized to fix the number of shares in each series and to determine the designation, rights,
privileges, restrictions, and conditions attached to the shares of each series.
Holders of preferred shares do not hold voting rights. The preferred shares are entitled to a priority over the Common Shares with
respect to the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets upon the liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up of Compton.



- 41 -







Cashless Warrants



In the third quarter of 2011, Cashless Warrants
were distributed in association with the 2011 Recapitalization. The Cashless Warrants trade on the TSX under the symbol CMT.WT.A
and expire three years from the date of issuance. The Cashless Warrants will be automatically converted to Common Shares on the
basis of one Common Shares for each Cashless Warrant if at any time during the term of the cashless warrants:



| | a) | the volume-weighted average trading price of the Common Shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the
preceding 20 trading days is equal to or exceeds the applicable warrant trigger price (the “Warrant Trigger Price”);
or
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | a transaction occurs that would constitute a change of control of Compton (including by way of merger,
plan of arrangement or similar transaction) at a price per Common Share, as determined by a nationally recognized investment dealer
selected by Compton if all or any portion of the consideration under that transaction is other than cash, of at least equal to
the applicable Warrant Trigger Price.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No consideration is payable by the warrant holder
to acquire the Common Shares issuable upon conversion of the Cashless Warrants once the Warrant Trigger Price has been reached.
The Warrant Trigger Price is as follows:



| | a) | Year 1: $11.92 (August 24, 2011 to August 23, 2012)
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------



| | b) | Year 2: $12.52 (August 24, 2012 to August 23, 2013)
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------



| | c) | Year 3: $13.14 (August 24, 2013 to August 23, 2014)
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------



Holders of Cashless Warrants do not have rights
as shareholders.



Stock Option Plan



Compton has a stock option
plan (the “Stock Option Plan”) which offers the holders of Options the opportunity to participate in the appreciation
of the Common Shares and is therefore intended to encourage employees (including executives) to improve the value of the Common
Shares by achieving a high level of performance. Directors, Officers, employees and consultants of the Corporation and its subsidiaries
are eligible to receive Options under the Stock Option Plan.



In accordance with the requirements
of the Toronto Stock Exchange, every three years after institution of a “rolling” stock option plan, all unallocated
options, rights and other entitlements under such plan must be approved by both a majority of the issuer’s board of directors
and a majority of the issuer’s shareholders. Compton’s Stock Option Plan is a rolling plan that was approved at the
Corporation’s annual and special meeting of shareholders on May 12, 2010. The Corporation has the ability to continue granting
options under the Stock Option Plan until 2013, which is three years from the date when shareholder approval was granted.



Restricted Share Unit Plan



The Corporation is proposing
to establish a restricted share unit plan (the “RSU Plan”) which will form part of its annual and long-term
incentive compensation arrangements available for employees, Directors and consultants of the Corporation,
at the discretion of the Governance Committee. The description of the RSU Plan is written on the assumption that the RSU Plan,
as presented to the shareholders, is approved at the Corporation’s Annual and Special General Meeting on May 10, 2012.



- 42 -







The RSU Plan is designed to
reward participants (the “Participant”, together, the “Participants”) to reflect performance
of both corporate and individual goals and objectives in the form of cash and/or Common Shares. The RSU Plan is intended to provide
employees, Directors and consultants of the Corporation with an additional incentive to further the growth and development of Compton
and will encourage them to remain with the Corporation. The selection of Participants will be based on the Participant’s
current and potential contribution to the Corporation and the terms of the grants may include performance targets or the achievement
of certain collective performance related criteria, such as the financial performance of the Corporation. Performance targets shall
be set out in the grant agreement between Compton and the Participant under which RSUs are granted. Participants in the RSU plan
may include, at the discretion of the Governance Committee, employees, Directors or consultants of the Corporation. At present,
Compton intends to grant RSUs to its independent Directors. In the future, the Corporation may grant RSUs to the broader class
of Participants.



Shareholder Rights Plan



Compton has a shareholder
rights plan (the “Rights Plan”) under the terms of a shareholder rights plan agreement dated as of June 3, 2009
between Compton and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as rights agent. The Rights Plan is designed to encourage the fair treatment
of shareholders in connection with a take-over bid for Compton. Rights issued under the Rights Plan become exercisable when a person,
and any related parties, acquires or announces its intention to acquire 20% or more of the outstanding Common Shares without complying
with certain provisions set out in the Rights Plan or without approval of the Board of Directors of Compton. Should such an acquisition
or announcement occur, each rights holder, other than the acquiring person and related parties, will have the right to purchase
Common Shares at a 50% discount to the market price at that time. The Rights Plan was ratified by shareholders at the annual and
special meeting of Compton shareholders held on May 11, 2009.



Shareholders may obtain a
copy of the Rights Plan on www.sedar.com or from the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation at (403) 237-9400 or by writing
to Compton Petroleum Corporation, Suite 500, 850 – 2nd Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2P 0R8, Attention: Corporate
Secretary.



- 43 -







MARKET FOR SECURITIES



The outstanding Common Shares of the Corporation
are listed on the TSX under the symbol CMT. The following table sets out the high and low closing prices and average trading volume
of Common Shares as reported by the TSX, for the periods indicated.



|Period      |  |   | TSX High Close |  |  |   | TSX Low Close |  |  |  | TSX Average Daily Trading Volume | 
|----------- |  | - | -------------- |  |  | - | ------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------- | 
|2011        |  |   |                |  |  |   |               |  |  |  |                                  | 
|January     |  | $ | 0.47           |  |  | $ | 0.40          |  |  |  | 3,430,403                        | 
|February    |  | $ | 0.45           |  |  | $ | 0.40          |  |  |  | 1,728,674                        | 
|March       |  | $ | 0.38           |  |  | $ | 0.32          |  |  |  | 979,222                          | 
|April       |  | $ | 0.35           |  |  | $ | 0.29          |  |  |  | 420,776                          | 
|May         |  | $ | 0.31           |  |  | $ | 0.17          |  |  |  | 595,688                          | 
|June        |  | $ | 0.24           |  |  | $ | 0.11          |  |  |  | 1,359,871                        | 
|July        |  | $ | 0.13           |  |  | $ | 0.11          |  |  |  | 534,727                          | 
|August(1)   |  | $ | 18.50          |  |  | $ | 0.11          |  |  |  | 309,930                          | 
|September   |  | $ | 7.90           |  |  | $ | 6.20          |  |  |  | 20,504                           | 
|October     |  | $ | 7.10           |  |  | $ | 5.13          |  |  |  | 28,577                           | 
|November    |  | $ | 6.59           |  |  | $ | 5.25          |  |  |  | 18,604                           | 
|December    |  | $ | 5.01           |  |  | $ | 4.20          |  |  |  | 24,531                           | 
|            |  |   |                |  |  |   |               |  |  |  |                                  | 
|2012        |  |   |                |  |  |   |               |  |  |  |                                  | 
|January     |  | $ | 4.53           |  |  | $ | 3.93          |  |  |  | 53,060                           | 
|February    |  | $ | 4.32           |  |  | $ | 4.20          |  |  |  | 21,100                           | 
|March 1 - 7 |  | $ | 4.17           |  |  | $ | 4.11          |  |  |  | 6,036                            | 

| | (1) | Shares consolidated at 200:1 effective August 10, 2011; plan of arrangement associated with the
2011 Recapitalization completed effective August 23, 2011.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



CONFLICTS OF INTEREST



The directors and officers of Compton are engaged
in and will continue to engage in other activities in the oil and natural gas industry and as a result of these and other activities,
the directors and officers of Compton may become subject to conflicts of interest. The ABCA provides that in the event that a director
has an interest in a contract or proposed contract or agreement, the director shall disclose his interest in such contract or agreement
and shall refrain from voting on any matter in respect of such contract or agreement unless otherwise provided under the ABCA.
To the extent that conflicts of interest arise, such conflicts will be resolved in accordance with the provisions of the ABCA.
As at the date hereof, Compton is not aware of any existing or potential material conflicts of interest between Compton and a director
or officer of the Corporation.



INTERESTS OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL
TRANSACTIONS



None of the current executive officers or directors
of Compton, and no person or company that is the direct or indirect beneficial owner of, or who exercised control or direction
over more than 10% of the Common Shares of Compton, nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing has or has had, at any time,
any material interest, directly or indirectly, in any transaction or proposed transaction that has materially affected or would
materially affect Compton that has not been resolved in the manner required by the ABCA.



- 44 -







CEASE TRADE ORDERS, BANKRUPTCIES, PENALTIES
OR SANCTIONS



None of those persons who are directors or officers
of Compton is or has been within the past 10 years, a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of any company,
including Compton, that, while such person was acting in that capacity, was the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an
order that denied company access to any exemption under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days,
or after such persons ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of the company was the subject
of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the company access to any exemption under securities legislation, for
a period of more than 30 consecutive days, which resulted from an event that occurred while acting in such capacity.



In addition, none of those persons who are directors
or executive officers of Compton or a shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of Compton to affect materially the
control of the Corporation, is, or has been within the past 10 years, a director or executive officer of any company, including
Compton, that while such person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity became
bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings,
arrangement or compromise within creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold assets.



None of the persons who are directors or officers
of Compton have been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities
regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority or been subject to any other
penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor
in making an investment decision.



MATERIAL CONTRACTS



Except for contracts entered into in the ordinary
course of business, Compton has not entered into any material contracts within the last financial year, or before the last financial
year which are still in effect, other than as follows:



| | · | the Cashless Warrant indenture dated August 22, 2011, providing for the issuance of the Cashless
Warrants (see “Capital Structure – Cashless Warrants”);
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Compton’s credit agreement, arranged with a syndicate of banks, providing for the Credit
Facilities (see “General Development of the Business – Bank Debt”); and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | a purchase and sale and royalty agreement for the sale of the ORR to a third party. The ORR represents
5.0% of the gross production revenue on the Corporation’s existing land base less certain transportation costs and marketing
fees, calculated on a monthly basis.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS



To the knowledge of the Corporation, there are
no legal proceedings material to the Corporation to which the Corporation is or was a party to or of which any of its properties
is or was the subject of, during the financial year ended December 31, 2011 nor are there any such proceedings known to the Corporation
to be contemplated.



- 45 -







During the year ended December 31, 2011, there
were no: (i) penalties or sanctions imposed against the Corporation by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities
regulatory authority; (ii) penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body against the Corporation that would likely
be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision, or (iii) settlement agreements the Corporation
entered into before a court relating to securities legislation or with a securities regulatory authority.



INTERESTS OF EXPERTS



As at the date hereof, the partners and associates
of Grant Thornton, LLP, the auditors of Compton, as a group, did not beneficially own any of Compton’s outstanding Common
Shares. As at the date hereof, principals of GLJ, the independent reserve auditors of Compton, as a group, own, directly or indirectly,
less than 1% of the outstanding Common Shares.



DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS



Directors



The next Annual Meeting is scheduled for May
10, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. (Calgary time) in the Leduc Room of the Fairmont Palliser Hotel, 133 – 9 Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta,
Canada. All directors of Compton stand for election at each annual meeting of the Corporation.



The Board of Directors has established an Audit,
Finance and Risk Committee; Reserves, Operations and Environmental, Health and Safety Committee; and a Corporate Governance, Human
Resources and Compensation Committee. The Board Committees are comprised of independent directors, other than Dr. Bogle who is
an ex-officio non-voting member of the Reserves, Operations and Environmental, Health & Safety Committee and the Corporate
Governance, Human Resources and Compensation Committee. Dr. Bogle is a non-independent director due to his position as Interim
Chief Executive Officer of Compton.



The name, city of residence, and principal occupation
during the last five years of each of the current directors of the Corporation are set forth in the following table.





|Name and Municipality of Residence                                         | Principal Occupation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | Director Since
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------
|Adrian Loader, M.A. London, U.K.                                           | Chairman, Compton Petroleum Corporation. Mr. Loader
        is a former President and CEO of Shell Canada. He currently serves as Chairman of Oracle Coalfields, Director of Holcim Ltd., and
        Member of the International Advisory Board, Garda World Security Corporation and the Advisory Board of Lane Clark & Peacock.
        
        Mr. Loader is the Chairman of the Board
        of Directors of Compton.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | 2011          
|Dr. Edward Bogle, Ph.D., ICD.D. P.Geol.
        

Calgary, Alberta, Canada | President and CEO of the Corporation. Prior
        to this, he was the Executive in Residence at the Alberta Department of Energy. Dr. Bogle is also President & CEO of Holocene
        Equity Inc., a privately held equity company involved in energy and strategic consulting and private and public energy related
        investment.  Previously, he was Chief Strategic Officer of Nexen International and was Executive Vice President, Exploration
        for Talisman Energy Inc.
        
        Dr. Bogle serves as Chairman of the Magenta
        III Mortgage Investment Corporation and as a Director of Condor Petroleum Inc, Skope Energy Inc., and Fogo Energy Corporation. | 2011          





- 46 -









|Name and Municipality of Residence                                          | Principal Occupation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | Director Since
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------
|Randall J. Findlay, P. Eng
        

Calgary, Alberta, Canada               | Independent businessman. Mr. Findlay is the
        past president and co-founder of Provident Energy Trust.
        Previously, he held senior executive positions at TransCanada PipeLines, NOVA, Encor and Aberford.
        

Mr. Findlay is currently a director of
Canadian         Helicopters (Chairman), Pembina Pipelines, Provident Energy, Superior Plus, Whitemud  Resources, and
Charger Energy, all of which are public companies. He is a Director and Past Chair of the
Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation, a         director of Hull Child and Family Services Foundation and a member of the
UBC Campaign Cabinet.
        

Mr. Findlay is the Chairman of the Reserves,
        Operations and Environmental Health and Safety Committee. | 2012          
|George K. Hickox, Jr. M.B.A., P. Eng
        

Villanova, PA, United States | Principal of an energy investment
        partnership,         Heller Hickox & Company. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of Sun Drilling Products
        Corp., Pardee Resources Company and         other private entities.
        

Mr. Hickox is the Chairman of the Corporate
        Governance, Human Resources and Compensation Committee.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | 2011          
|Michael J. Leffell, J.D.
Scarsdale, NY, United States                       | Independent businessman. Mr. Leffell is the founder of Portage Advisors, LLC, a privately held company focused on alternative asset investments and consulting. Until his retirement in 2009, Mr. Leffell was the Deputy Executive Managing Member of Davidson Kempner Capital Management.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | 2011          
|Glen Roane, MBA, ICD.D                                                      | Independent Businessman. Mr. Roane retired from
        TD Asset Management Inc., a subsidiary of The Toronto-Dominion Bank. Previously he was a founding partner of Lancaster Financial
        Inc., a financial advisory and investment management firm. Mr. Roane was formerly employed by Burns Fry Limited and by The Toronto-Dominion
        Bank.
        



Mr. Roane currently serves as a director of
        Enerplus Resources Corporation, Badger Daylighting Ltd., Logan International Inc., SilverBirch Energy Corporation and the GBC American
        Growth Fund. He is also a member of the Alberta Securities Commission.
        

Mr. Roane is the Chairman of the Audit, Finance
        and Risk Committee.                              | 2012          



Further information about the directors and
the committees of the Board of Directors is set forth under the heading “Election of Directors” in the Corporation’s
Management Proxy Circular dated March 7, 2011 relating to the Meeting to be held on May 10, 2012, which sections are incorporated
by reference into this AIF.



- 47 -







Officers



Information is given below with respect to each
of the current officers of the Corporation. The name, city of residence, and principal occupation during the last five years of
each of the officers of the Corporation are set forth in the following table.





|Name and Municipality of Residence                                       | Principal Occupation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dr. Edward Bogle, Ph.D., ICD.D. P.Geol.
        Calgary, Alberta, Canada | President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.  Prior to this, he was the Executive in Residence at the Alberta Department of Energy. Dr. Bogle is also President & CEO of Holocene Equity Inc., a privately held equity company involved in energy and strategic consulting and private and public energy related investment.  Previously, he was Chief Strategic Officer of Nexen International and was Executive Vice President, Exploration for Talisman Energy Inc.
|C.W. Leigh Cassidy, CA, CFA
        Calgary, Alberta                     | Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation. Mr. Cassidy brings more than 25 years of senior financial experience in the petroleum industry which includes extensive restructuring, capital and debt market experience. Most recently, Mr. Cassidy was Chief Financial Officer at Bow Valley Energy and prior to that, held various senior positions at Signet Energy, UTS Energy, Household International, Emtech and Procter and Gamble.                





As at March 7, 2011, the directors and officers
of Compton as a group beneficially owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, 6,000 Common Shares of Compton, representing approximately
0% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares of the Corporation. None of the directors or officers held a sufficient number of
Common Shares to materially affect the control of Compton.



COMMITTEE INFORMATION



Based upon applicable Canadian and United States
securities laws and the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance rules, Compton has adopted “Standards of Independence,”
which may be viewed in full on the Corporation’s website. The Board affirmatively determines on an annual basis the independence
of its members. Messrs. Findlay, Hickox, Leffell, Loader and Roane have been determined to be independent directors.



Audit, Finance and Risk Committee



| | Chairman: | Glen Roane
| | --------- | ----------

| | Members: | Michael J. Leffell, Adrian Loader (ex officio, voting),
| | -------- | -------------------------------------------------------

| |  | Dr. Edward W. Bogle (ex officio, non-voting)
| |  | --------------------------------------------



Mr. Roane is considered to be a “financial
expert,” as defined in National Instrument 52-110, “Audit Committees,” (“NI 52-110”) issued
by the CSA, due to his experience in corporate finance and accounting as a Chartered Accountant and Financial Analyst. All other
Committee members are “financially literate,” as defined in NI 52-110, due to their experience in various management
positions or qualification as a Chartered Accountant.



The Charter of the Audit, Finance and Risk Committee
can be located on the Corporation’s website at www.comptonpetroleum.com.



- 48 -







External Auditor Fees



The aggregate amounts billed by Grant Thornton
LLP to the Corporation with respect to fees payable for audit and audit-related engagements (including separate audits of subsidiary
entities, financings, and regulatory reporting requirements), tax and other services in the fiscal years ended December 31,
2011 and 2010 were as follows:





|Type of Service                                | Fiscal 2011 | Fiscal 2010
|---------------------------------------------- | ----------- | -----------
|Financial statement and internal control audit | $           | 1,019,279  
|Audit related                                  |             | 62,714     
|Tax                                            |             | 55,630     
|Other non-audit                                |             | 80,260     
|Total                                          | $           | 1,217,883  





Financial
statement audit fees in fiscal 2011 and 2010 include those charged in respect of the annual financial statement audit,  the
quarterly review of the financial statements and for transitioning the Corporation to International Financial Reporting Standards. Fees
charged in 2011 and 2010 for the audit of internal controls relate to requirements under the United States Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and similar Canadian regulatory compliance.



Audit related fees include
services performed to translate the annual and quarterly financial statements into French as well as the reimbursement of the pro-rata
share of annual fees changed to each audit firm by the Canadian Public Accountability Board.



Tax services performed
by Grant Thornton outside of normal audit procedures during 2011 related to debt restructuring and the preparation and filing
of the annual returns. Other non-audit fees relate to services provided during the issue of offering documents and other
ancillary consultations.



The Audit, Finance and Risk Committee of the
Corporation considered these fees and determined that they were reasonable and do not impact the independence of the Corporation’s
auditors. Further, such Committee determined that in order to ensure the continued independence of the auditors, only limited non-audit
related services would be provided to the Corporation by Grant Thornton LLP and in such case, only with the prior approval of the
Audit, Finance and Risk Committee. The Committee has pre-approved Management to retain Grant Thornton LLP to provide miscellaneous,
minor, non-audit services in circumstances where it is not feasible or practical to convene a meeting of the Audit, Finance and
Risk Committee, subject to an aggregate limit of $25,000 per quarter.



Reserves, Operations and Environmental, Health and Safety Committee



| | Chairman: | Randall J. Findlay
| | --------- | ------------------

| | Members: | George K. Hickox, Jr., Glen Roane, Adrian Loader (ex officio, voting),
| | -------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | Dr. Edward W. Bogle (ex officio, non-voting)
| |  | --------------------------------------------



The Charter of the Reserves, Operations and
Environmental, Health and Safety Committee can be located on the Corporation’s website at www.comptonpetroleum.com.



- 49 -







Corporate Governance, Human Resources and Compensation Committee



| | Chairman: | George K. Hickox, Jr.
| | --------- | ---------------------

| | Members: | Michael J. Leffell, Adrian Loader (ex officio, voting),
| | -------- | -------------------------------------------------------

| |  | Dr. Edward W. Bogle (ex officio, non-voting)
| |  | --------------------------------------------



The Charter of the Corporate Governance, Human
Resources and Compensation Committee can be located on the Corporation’s website at www.comptonpetroleum.com.



TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR



The transfer agent and registrar for the Corporation’s
shares is Computershare Trust Company of Canada at its office: 600, 530 – 8th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2P
3S8.



ADDITIONAL INFORMATION



Additional information including
directors’ and officers’ remuneration, principal holders of the Corporation’s Common Shares, options to acquire
Common Shares and interests of insiders in material transactions (if applicable) is contained in the Management Proxy Circular
issued by Management dated March 7, 2012, relating to the Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 10, 2012.
Additional financial information is also provided in the consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in the Corporation’s 2011 Annual Report.
Copies of these and other documents relating to Compton have been filed with the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval
(“SEDAR”) at www.sedar.com. Copies of the AIF may be obtained on request without charge by contacting:



Compton Petroleum Corporation

Suite 500 Bankers Court

850 – 2nd Street S.W.

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

T2P 0R8

| | Attention: | Corporate Secretary
| | ---------- | -------------------

| | Telephone: | (403) 237-9400
| | ---------- | --------------

| | Fax: | (403) 237-9410
| | ---- | --------------



In addition to the continuous
disclosure obligations under the securities laws of the provinces of Canada, Compton is subject to the information reporting requirements
of the Exchange Act, and in accordance therewith file reports with, and furnish other information to, the SEC. Under a multi-jurisdictional
disclosure system adopted by the United States and Canada, these reports and other information (including financial information)
may be prepared in accordance with the disclosure requirements of Canada, which differ in certain respects from those in the United
States. As a foreign private issuer, the Corporation is exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing
and content of proxy statements, and Compton’s officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting
and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, Compton is not required to
publish financial statements as promptly as U.S. companies.



- 50 -







Any document filed with or
furnished to the securities commissions and authorities of the provinces of Canada may be read through SEDAR. Any document filed
with or furnished to the SEC may be read at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20549. Prospective investors may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information regarding the public reference facilities.
The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports and other information Compton files with the SEC.



ADVISORIES



Use of BOE Equivalents



The oil and natural gas industry commonly expresses
production volumes and reserves on a boe basis whereby natural gas volumes are converted at the ratio of six thousand cubic feet
to one barrel of oil. The intention is to sum oil, ngls, and natural gas measurement units into one basis for improved measurement
of results and comparisons with other industry participants. Compton has used the 6:1 boe measure in this document, which is the
approximate energy equivalency of the two commodities at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
However, this does not represent a value equivalency at the plant gate where Compton sells its production volumes and therefore
may be a misleading measure if used in isolation.



Forward-Looking Statements



Certain information regarding the Corporation
contained herein include “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning
of applicable Canadian securities laws, and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”).



Forward-looking information and statements involve
risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
them. Sentences and phrases containing words such as “believe”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “plan”,
“predict”, “outlook”, “goals”, “targets”, “projects”, “may”,
“hope”, “can”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “intend”, “is
designed to”, “continues”, “with the intent”, “potential”, “strategy”, and
the negative of any of these words, or variations of them, or comparable terminology that does not relate strictly to current or
historical facts, are all indicative of forward-looking information or statements. Discussions containing forward-looking statements
may be found, among other places, in the “General Development of the Business”, “Description of the Business”
and “Risk Factors” sections herein. Examples of forward-looking information and statements in this AIF include, but
are not limited to:



| | · | the focus of capital expenditures;
| | - | ----------------------------------



| | · | the sale, farming in, farming out or development of certain exploration properties using third
party resources;
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | the impact of changes in oil and natural gas prices on cash flow after hedging;
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | drilling plans;
| | - | ---------------



| | · | the existence, operation and strategy of the commodity price risk management program;
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | the approximate and maximum amount of forward sales and hedging to be employed;
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



- 51 -







| | · | Compton’s growth strategy, the criteria to be considered in connection therefore and the
benefits to be derived there from;
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | the impact of Canadian federal and provincial governmental regulation on Compton relative to other
oil and gas issuers of similar size;
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | the goal to sustain or grow production and reserves through prudent management and acquisitions;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | the emergence of accretive growth opportunities; and
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------



| | · | Compton’s ability to benefit from the combination of growth opportunities and the ability
to grow through the capital markets.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The material assumptions in making these forward-looking
statements include certain assumptions disclosed in Compton’s annual Management's Discussion and Analysis under the headings
“Liquidity and Capital Resources”, “Capital Structure”, “Outlook” and “Critical Accounting
Estimates”.



Although Compton believes that the expectations
reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.
There is no guarantee of future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Actual results could differ materially
from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors set forth below, elsewhere in this AIF
and in Compton’s annual Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Risks”, including, but
not limited to:



| | · | general economic conditions in Canada, the United States and globally;
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | industry conditions, including volatility in market prices for oil and natural gas;
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | royalties payable in respect of Compton’s oil and natural gas production;
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | governmental regulation of the oil and gas industry, including environmental regulation;
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | fluctuation in foreign exchange or interest rates;
| | - | --------------------------------------------------



| | · | unanticipated operating events which can reduce production or cause production to be shut in or
delayed or operating costs to increase;
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | failure to obtain industry partner and other third party consents and approvals, when required;
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | stock market volatility and market valuations; and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------



| | · | the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------



Statements relating to “reserves”
or “resources” are deemed to be forward-looking statements, as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain
estimates and assumptions that the resources and reserves described can be profitably produced in the future. Readers are cautioned
that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. The forward-looking statements contained in this AIF:



| | (a) | were made as of the dates stated therein;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------



| | (b) | represent Compton’s views as of such dates and should not be relied upon as representing
its views as of any subsequent date; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------



- 52 -







While Compton anticipates that subsequent events
and developments may cause its views to change, the Corporation specifically disclaims any intention or obligation to update forward-looking
information and statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by
applicable securities laws. Except as required by law, Compton has no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information
or forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.



Forward-looking information and statements contained
in this AIF by reference about prospective results of operations, financial position or cash flows that are based upon assumptions
about future economic conditions and courses of action are presented for the purpose of assisting the Corporation’s security
holders in understanding Management’s current views regarding those future outcomes, and may not be appropriate for other
purposes.



There can be no assurance that the forward-looking
information and statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could vary or differ materially from
those anticipated by them. Accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking information and statements. Forward-looking
information and statements for time periods subsequent to 2011 involve greater risks and require longer term assumptions and estimates
from those for 2011, and are consequently subject to greater uncertainty. Therefore, special caution should be taken in terms
of placing reliance on such long-term forward-looking information and statements.



- 53 -











SCHEDULE A
REPORT ON RESERVES DATA BY INDEPENDENT
QUALIFIED RESERVES
EVALUATOR OR AUDITOR





- 54 -















- 55 -







SCHEDULE B
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS
ON RESERVES ON OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURE



Management of Compton Petroleum Corporation
(the “Corporation”) is responsible for the preparation and disclosure of information with respect to the Corporation’s
oil and gas activities in accordance with securities regulatory requirements. This information includes reserves data, which are
estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2011, estimated using
forecast prices and costs.



An independent qualified reserves evaluator
has evaluated 100% of the Corporation’s reserves data. The report of the independent qualified reserves evaluator will be
filed with securities regulatory authorities concurrently with this report.



The Reserves, Operations and Environmental,
Health and Safety Committee of the Board of Directors of the Corporation has:



| | (a) | reviewed the Corporation’s procedures for providing information to the independent qualified
reserves evaluator;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | met with the independent qualified reserves evaluator to determine whether any restrictions affected
the ability of the independent qualified reserves evaluator to report without reservation; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | reviewed the reserves data with Management and the independent qualified reserves evaluator.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Reserves, Operations and Environmental,
Health and Safety Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed the Corporation’s procedures for assembling and reporting
other information associated with oil and gas activities and has reviewed that information with Management. The Board of Directors
has, on the recommendation of the Reserves, Operations and Environmental, Health and Safety Committee, approved:



| | (a) | the content and filing with securities regulatory authorities of Form 51-101F1 containing reserves
data and other oil and gas information;
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the filing of Form 51-102F2 which is the report of the independent qualified reserves evaluator
on the reserves data; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | the content and filing of this report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------



- 56 -







Because the reserves data are based on judgments
regarding future events, actual results will vary and the variations may be material. However, any variations should be consistent
with the fact that reserves are categorized according to the probability of their recovery.





|/s/ Edward W. Bogle
        Edward Bogle
        President & CEO                                                                            | /s/ C.W. Leigh Cassidy
        C. W. Leigh Cassidy
        Vice President, Finance & CFO
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                            |                                                                                         
|/s/ Randall J. Findlay
        Randall J. Findlay
        Chairman of the Reserves, Operations & Environmental, Health and Safety Committee | /s/ Adrian Loader
        Adrian Loader
        Chairman of the Board                   





March 7, 2011





- 57 -