alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR TANISYS TECHNOLOGY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,775,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,072,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                    87,918
<INVENTORY>                                  3,572,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,967,485
<PP&E>                                       3,692,641
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,280,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,440,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,809,901
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    22,988,004
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,443,412)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,440,018
<SALES>                                     27,321,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,321,039
<CGS>                                       24,122,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,122,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,220,456
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,806,647
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             316,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,324,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,324,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,324,319)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Royal Lee BERRY.

No. 116P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of March 2007 by Defendant for "Petition for Review of the Clerk of the Court of Appeals' Action of Signing the Orders in Lieu of the Court of Appeals Judge(s) Signing Orders":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 169 (Thursday, September 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 52155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17422]

[[Page 52155]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

August 25, 2005.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before October 3, 2005 
to be assured of consideration.

United States Mint

    OMB Number: 1525-0013.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Application for Commercial Product License and Application 
for Intellectual Property Use.
    Form: U.S. Mint form 3044 and form 3045.
    Description: The application forms allow individuals and business 
entities to apply for Non-product License or Commercial Product License 
to use United States Mint intellectual property and trademark and 
copyright materials for products.
    Respondents: Business and other for-profit and individuals or 
households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 120.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 131 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Yvonne Pollard, (202) 722-7310, United States 
Mint, 799 9th Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20220.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Michael A. Robinson,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-17422 Filed 8-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-37-P
```
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3450 

To provide for the rescission of funds made available for fiscal year 2009 

for Iraq reconstruction. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 

Mr. COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To provide for the rescission of funds made available for 

fiscal year 2009 for Iraq reconstruction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESCISSION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2009 

4 FUNDS FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION. 

5 (a) BRIDGE FUNDS FOR ECONOMIC SUPPORT FUND

6 FOR IRAQ.—The amount appropriated by subchapter B of 

7 chapter 4 of title I of the Supplemental Appropriations 

8 Act, 2008 (Public Law 110–252) under the heading ‘‘ECO9 NOMIC SUPPORT FUND’’ and available for assistance for 

10 Iraq is hereby rescinded. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3450 IS

1 (b) DEFENSE BRIDGE FUNDS FOR IRAQ SECURITY

2 FORCES FUND.—The amount appropriated by chapter 2 

3 of title IX of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008 

4 under the heading ‘‘IRAQ SECURITY FORCES FUND’’ is 

5 hereby rescinded. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
NOTE
  Company COMERICA
BANK Lender Credit Agreement
 Section 2.04(f)
   [Remainder of page left blank intentionally; signature page follows.]




---



##### 



SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC.By:
    /s/ DAVID P. COSPERName:
    David P. CosperTitle:
    Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



LOANS AND PAYMENTS WITH RESPECT THERETO
 Amount ofPrincipal or
    
    OutstandingEnd of
    
    Interest
    
    PrincipalType of
    
    Amount of
    
    Interest
    
    Paid This
    
    Balance
    
    NotationDate
    
    Loan Made
    
    Loan Made
    
    Period
    
    Date
    
    This Date
    
    Made By
EXHIBIT 11

                         THE GENERAL CHEMICAL GROUP INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNT)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

Earnings per share were calculated as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED     NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                      SEPTEMBER 30,          SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                    ------------------     -----------------
                                                      1995       1996       1995      1996
                                                      ----       ----       ----      ----
<S>                                             <C>         <C>         <C>      <C>
Primary

   Total income used for primary
    earnings per share...........................  $ 12,626   $ 14,634   $ 33,280   $ 30,992
                                                   ========   ========   ========   ========

   Weighted average common shares
    outstanding..................................    19,737     22,237     19,737     20,996

   Weighted average common
    equivalents shares...........................       --         929        --         480
                                                   --------   --------   --------   --------

   Weighted average common and
    common equivalent shares.....................    19,737     23,166     19,737     21,476
                                                   ========   ========   ========   ========

   Primary earnings per common share
    and common equivalent share .................  $    .64   $    .63   $   1.69   $   1.44
                                                   ========   ========   ========   ========

Fully Diluted

   Total income used for fully diluted
    earnings per share...........................  $ 12,626   $ 14,634   $ 33,280   $ 30,992
                                                   ========   ========   ========   ========

   Weighted average common shares
    outstanding..................................    19,737     22,237     19,737     20,996

   Weighted average common
    equivalent shares............................       --       1,009        --         572
                                                   --------   --------   --------   --------

   Weighted average common and
    common equivalent shares.....................    19,737     23,246     19,737     21,568
                                                   ========   ========   ========   ========

   Fully diluted earnings per common share
    and common equivalent share..................  $    .64   $    .63   $   1.69   $   1.44
                                                   ========   ========   ========   ========

</TABLE>





                                      -15-


<PAGE>
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29758 06-FEB-2012 01:28 PM

NO. SCWC-29758 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

IN THE INTEREST OF D.Q.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 29758; FC-J NO. 0081885) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.) Petitioner’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on January 5, 2012, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, February 6, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna Stuart N. Fujioka for petitioner on the application
IN RE S.J.R.

No. COA06-986.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007.

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Davidson (05J128).

Cases reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles M. Dauber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of American Electric Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of American Electric Technologies, Inc.



|               |  |     |  |                            
|-------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|March 26, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    Charles M.
Dauber   
|               |  |     |  | Charles M. Dauber          
|               |  |     |  | Principal Executive Officer

I, John H.
Untereker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of American Electric Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of American Electric Technologies, Inc.



|               |  |     |  |                            
|-------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|March 26, 2010 |  |     |  |                            
|               |  | By: |  | /s/    John H.
Untereker   
|               |  |     |  | John H. Untereker          
|               |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
Elsie M. LEE v. SPRING PINES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.

No. 176P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Elsie M. Lee, pro se.

Christopher N. Heiskell, Margaret P. Eagles, for Homeowners Association.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of April 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 11


                        PAULA FINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED         NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                              SEPTEMBER 30               SEPTEMBER 30
                                                            1997          1998          1997         1998
                                                            ----          ----          ----         ----

<S>                                                     <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
 Net income (loss)                                           $1,271       $1,634        $3,565       ($5,344) 
                                                         ----------    ---------     ---------     ---------
                                                         ----------    ---------     ---------     ---------

 Weighted average shares outstanding for calculating
       basic earnings per share                           1,898,793    6,276,451     1,901,582     6,309,895

 Convertible preferred stock                              1,882,354       --         1,882,354         --
 Warrants                                                    77,206       --            60,345         --
 Options                                                    339,055      230,203       253,963         --
                                                         ----------    ---------     ---------     ---------

 Total shares for calculating diluted earnings
       per share                                          4,197,408    6,506,654     4,098,244     6,309,895
                                                         ----------    ---------     ---------     ---------
                                                         ----------    ---------     ---------     ---------

 Basic earnings (loss) per share                         $     0.67        $0.26         $1.87        ($0.85)
                                                         ----------    ---------     ---------     ---------
                                                         ----------    ---------     ---------     ---------

 Diluted earnings (loss) per share                       $     0.30        $0.25         $0.87        ($0.85)
                                                         ----------    ---------     ---------     ---------
                                                         ----------    ---------     ---------     ---------
</TABLE>



Options are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as the
inclusion of such options would have an anti-dilutive effect.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 343 

To extend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2007 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. AKAKA, and Ms. 

LANDRIEU) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 

1999. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 5-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF TUITION ASSIST4 ANCE PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) PUBLIC SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 3(i) of the 

6 District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 38– 

7 2702(i), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ‘‘each 

8 of the 7 succeeding fiscal years’’ and inserting ‘‘each of 

9 the 12 succeeding fiscal years’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 343 IS

1 (b) PRIVATE SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 5(f) of 

2 such Act (sec. 38–2704(f), D.C. Official Code) is amended 

3 by striking ‘‘each of the 7 succeeding fiscal years’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘each of the 12 succeeding fiscal years’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,176,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,649
<INVENTORY>                                  2,301,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,535,107
<PP&E>                                       1,020,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                 794,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,927,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,023,771
<BONDS>                                         32,610
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,634
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,860,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,927,626
<SALES>                                      4,340,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,340,486
<CGS>                                        2,415,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,801,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               852,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,227
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                574,193
<INCOME-TAX>                                   246,153
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            328,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   328,040
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 51335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Georgia Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference 
call of the Georgia Advisory Committee will convene at 10 a.m. (EST) 
and adjourn at 11 a.m. (EST) on Friday, September 9, 2005. The purpose 
of the meeting is to discuss the Committee's work on its project, 
Unitary Status of School Districts in Georgia.
    This conference call is available to the public through the 
following call-in number: 1-800-497-7708, conference contact name Peter 
Minarik. Any interested member of the public may call this number and 
listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls 
not initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines 
and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will 
incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line 
connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the 
proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-
8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and 
contact name, Peter Minarik.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting Peter 
Minarik, Regional Director, Southern Regional Office, (404) 562-7000 
(TDD/TTY 404-562-7004), by Tuesday, September 6, 2005.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, August 18, 2005.
Ivy Davis,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 05-17153 Filed 8-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Filed 3/29/17



## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, )

)

Plaintiff and Respondent, )

) S117489

v. )

)

GRAYLAND WINBUSH, ) Alameda County

) Super. Ct. No. 128408B

Defendant and Appellant. )

________________________________ ___ )

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND

DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

THE COURT:

The opinion in this matter filed January 26, 2017, and appearing at 2 Cal.5th 402,

is modified as follows:

On page 23 of the typed opinion (2 Cal.5th at p. 432), the sentence reading, “Her

candid admission that she could not vote for death under any circumstances revealed

views that would ‘ “prevent or substantially impair” ’ her ability to perform as a capital

juror. ( Wainwright v. Witt

, supra , 469 U.S. at p. 424.)” is modified to read, “The trial

court’s implied f

actual finding as to E. I.’s true state of mind that (1) she could not vote

for death under any circumstances, and (2) her point of view would ‘ “prevent or

substantially impair” ’ her ability to perform as a capital juror ( Wainwright v. Witt

, supra

,

469 U .S. at p. 424), has substantial support in the record and we defer to it ( People v.

Mickel (2016) 2 Cal.5th 181, 215).”

This modification does not change the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.
STATE v. Eric Glenn LANE.

No. 606A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 15, 2007.

C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of November 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time for Court Reporter to Deliver Transcripts:

"Motion Allowed. Court reporter shall have up to and including the 7th day of *715January 2008 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel. By order of the Court in conference this the 15th day of November 2007."