alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 24(b)

                                 SOLUTIA INC.

                                  CERTIFICATE

         I, Rosemary L. Klein, Senior Vice President, Secretary and General
Counsel of Solutia Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the following is
a full, true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Company on February 28, 2007, at which meeting a quorum was
present and acting throughout:

              FURTHER RESOLVED, that each officer and director who may be
              required to sign and execute the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K
              or any document in connection therewith (whether for and on
              behalf of the Company, or as an officer or director of the
              Company, or otherwise), be and hereby is authorized to execute a
              power of attorney appointing Rosemary L. Klein and Miriam R.
              Singer, or either of them acting alone, his or her true and
              lawful attorney or attorneys to sign in his or her name, place
              and stead in any such capacity such Annual Report on Form 10-K
              and any and all amendments thereto and documents in connection
              therewith, and to file the same with the Commission or any other
              governmental body, each of said attorneys to have power to act
              with or without the others, and to have full power and authority
              to do and perform, in the name and on behalf of each of said
              officers and directors, every act whatsoever which such
              attorneys, or any one of them, may deem necessary, appropriate
              or desirable to be done in connection therewith as fully and to
              all intents and purposes as such officers or directors might or
              could do in person.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand in my official
capacity and affixed the corporate seal of the Company this 2nd day of March,
2006.

                                     /s/ Rosemary L. Klein
                                     ---------------------
                                     Rosemary L. Klein
                                     Senior Vice President, General
                                     Counsel and Secretary

SEAL
HAGER v. CHECK INTO CASH OF NC, et al.

No. 463P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Carlene McNulty, F. Paul Bland, Jr., Mallam J. Maynard, Mona Lisa Wallace, Salisbury, John Hughes, Greensboro, Richard A. Fisher, for Hager and Hall.

Edwin M. Speas, Jr., Raleigh, Claudia Callaway, Washington, DC, for Check Into Cash, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st day of August 2006 by Plaintiffs to Consolidate:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of October 2007."
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 21, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00101-CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.W. AND A.RB.W., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-50032-2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Reichek, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Appellant’s brief in this case is over due. By postcard dated July 5, 2023 we informed appellant his brief wa s overdue and directed him to file his brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant th at failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed his brief or otherwise corres ponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b).

230101F.P05 /Robbie Partida-Kipness / ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF A.W. AND A.RB.W., CHILDREN
No. 05-23-00101-CV On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-50032- 2022.Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Reichek and Miskel participating. In accordance with this Court’s opini on of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered August 21, 2023
Opinion issued September 26, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00232-CR

———————————

DAIZY CELES COSTELLO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1544494

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Daizy Celes Costello, has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal in 

compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a).1 See TEX. R. APP. P.

 

1 Motion filed April 22, 2019.
2

42.2(a). The State has not opposed this motion. We have not issued a decision in the 

appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss 

any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
I25t-W

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 10-13-00163-CR OFFENSE: Poss of a Controlled Substance

Jamall Riddan Kennedy v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: McLennan

TRIAL COURT: 54th District Court MOTION

TRIAL COURTS: 2012-722-C2 FOR REHEARING IS:

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon. Matt Johnson DATE:

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED JUDGE: Davis

DATE: August 14, 2014

JUSTICE: Davis PC S YES

PUBLISH: YES DNP: YES

CLK RECORD: 6/21/2013 -1 volume SUPPCLKRECORD:

RPT RECORD: 8/14/2014 SUPP RPT RECORD:

STATE BR: 12/6/2013 SUPP BR:

APP BR: 10/18/2013 PRO SE BR:

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

PEO SE . Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: /7^/ky/^/r

JUDGE: fj4 UAStutrt—

CCA# iaS¥-/¥

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ON ON

JUDGE:
# Council Decision of 18 February 2014 appointing a Czech member of the Committee of the Regions (2014/101/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 18 February 2014

# appointing a Czech member of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/101/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Czech Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions will become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Bohuslav                              SVOBODA,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Mr Tomáš HUDEČEK, Primátor hl. města Prahy. 

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 18 February 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

G. Stournaras                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
STATE v. NICHOLSON

No. COA06-1109

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from Mecklenburg (03CRS255518, 03CRS255519).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.52



March 7, 2016


Mr. Harald Herrmann:


Thank you for providing advance notice of your decision to voluntarily resign from your employment with the Company and offering to assist with the transition of your responsibilities.  After giving our prior conversation some thought, I suggest that you remain employed by the Company until August 29, 2016.


Our plan is to begin the transition soon.  Effective March 9, 2016, your job title will change to Senior Vice President, Special Projects, and you will continue reporting to me.  In this new role, you will assist in the transition of the organization in light of your decision.  You will remain actively employed, on an at-will basis, through and until August 29, 2016, and your compensation and employment terms will remain subject to the terms of the Company’s applicable plans, policies, award agreements and prior agreements between you and the Company.


Because of the status of your Management Continuity Agreement with Darden Restaurants, Inc. dated as of December 17, 2013 (the “MCA”), I do want to be clear about this.  For the avoidance of doubt, I want to confirm that nothing described in this letter will give you any greater rights under your MCA with respect to the “change of control” (as that term is defined in the MCA) of the Company that occurred on October 10, 2014, as neither your decision to leave the Company nor the execution of our transition plan triggers any “Good Reason” (as that term is defined in the MCA) rights under the MCA.  To show that you share this understanding, I ask you to sign below to confirm your decision to resign as of August 29, 2016 and show your express written consent to these changes to your position, authority and responsibilities.


Thank you for your contributions to the Company during your years of service to Darden.  I look forward to continuing to work with you in your new role and appreciate your thoughtfulness in sharing your intentions and willingness to assist with this transition.




Darden Restaurants, Inc.


	
			
	By  /s/ Gene Lee
	/s/ Harald Herrmann
	Date 3/8/2016

	Gene Lee
	Harald Herrmann
	 

	President & CEO
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Global Green Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date here of (the “report”), I, Arnold Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 13th day of
April, 2009.








ARNOLD
HUGHES
 Arnold
Hughes
 Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3455 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3455

            To rescind unexpended Iraq reconstruction funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2008

  Mr. Dorgan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To rescind unexpended Iraq reconstruction funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rescission of Unneeded Iraq 
Reconstruction Funds Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) Iraq has abundant financial resources to fund relief 
        and reconstruction projects;
            (2)(A) in November 2007, the Government of Iraq estimated 
        that oil income in 2008 would amount to $35,000,000,000; but
            (B) with high crude oil prices and Iraq oil production at 
        record levels, the Special Inspector General for Iraq estimates 
        that oil revenues could exceed $70,000,000,000;
            (3) Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Barham Salih stated 
        recently that ``Iraq does not need financial assistance.'';
            (4) the Government Accountability Office estimates that the 
        Government of Iraq--
                    (A) has accumulated a budget surplus of 
                approximately $29,000,000,000 from fiscal year 2005 
                through 2007; and
                    (B) will accumulate a budget surplus of between 
                $38,200,000,000 and $50,300,000,000 for fiscal year 
                2008; and
            (5) according to the July 2008 quarterly report of the 
        Special Inspector General for Iraq--
                    (A) Congress has appropriated $43,560,000,000 for 
                the major United States reconstruction accounts in 
                Iraq; but
                    (B) over \1/4\ of those funds, or $12,570,000,000, 
                have not yet been expended, including unobligated funds 
                from appropriations for prior fiscal years.

SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF UNEXPENDED IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION FUNDS.

    There are rescinded any amounts that remain unexpended as of the 
date of enactment of this Act in--
            (1) the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund;
            (2) the Iraq Security Forces Fund; and
            (3) the Economic Support Fund authorized under chapter 4 of 
        part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2346 
        et seq.) that are available for Iraq.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.18



THE MARKED PORTIONS OF THIS AMENDMENT HAVE BEEN OMITTED

AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO

A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT



November 13, 2003



VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL/FIRST CLASS MAIL



Mr. Myles Cyr

Carnival Corporation

3655 NW 87thAvenue

Miami, FL 33178



Re: Fourth Amendment to Interactive Television System Agreement dated February 20, 2001, by and between Allin Interactive Corporation and
Carnival Cruise Lines (hereinafter Fourth Amendment)



Dear Myles:



This letter is to amend the Interactive Television System Agreement
(the Agreement) dated February 20, 2001, by and between Allin Interactive Corporation (Allin) and Carnival Cruise Lines (CCL). Capitalized terms shall have the meaning as set forth in Section 1 of that Agreement.



Whereas, Schedule 1.9 of the Agreement set forth an Installation Schedule for
the Agreement; and



Whereas, Schedule 1.11 of the Agreement sets forth Purchase
Prices and Payment Schedules under the Agreement, and



Whereas, the parties
desire to amend Schedules 1.9 and 1.11;



Now, therefore, Schedule 1.9 -
Installation Schedule is amended as follows:



Add the Carnival Miracle. Date
Installed of 2/01/2004 and Date Operational of 3/15/2004. Newbuild.



Now,
therefore, the Schedule 1.11 of the Agreement is amended as follows:



| | A. | Add: Carnival Miracle. Class  Spirit. Cabins  1,062. Price - $[REDACTED  CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED].
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Payment Schedule shall remain in accordance with the terms of Schedule 1.11 of the
Agreement.



In witness whereof, this Amendment has been duly executed by the
parties hereto as of the date first above written.



Allin Interactive
Corporation



|     |  |                        
|---- |  | -----------------------
|By:  |  | /s/ Richard W. Talarico
|Its: |  | Chairman & CEO         



Carnival Cruise Lines, a division of
Carnival Corporation



|     |  |              
|---- |  | -------------
|By:  |  | /s/ Myles Cyr
|Its: |  | VP - CIO
NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. Terry Davis ARMWOOD, Jr.; Terry Davis Armwood, Sr., Individually and as Parent and Guardian for Terry Davis Armwood, Jr.; Ramona Armwood, Individually and as Parent and Guardian for Terry Davis Armwood, Jr.; Jimmy Lee Best; and Stella H. Bostic.

No. 99A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 12, 2007.

*393Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 181 N.C.App. 407, 638 S.E.2d 922 (2007), affirming a judgment entered 13 July 2005 by Judge Howard E. Manning, Jr. in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 September 2007.

Young Moore and Henderson, P.A., by R. Michael Strickland and Glenn C. Raynor, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Law Offices of Frank A. Cassiano, by Frank A. Cassiano, Greenville, for defendant-appellees, Terry Davis Armwood, Sr. and Ramona Armwood, individually and as parents and guardians of Terry Davis Armwood, Jr.

Nexsen Pruet Adams Kleemeier, PLLC, by James W. Bryan and Daniel W. Koenig, Greensboro, for Trucking Industry Defense Association, amicus curiae.

Pinto Coates Kyre & Brown, PLLC, by David L. Brown, Greensboro, for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae.

Rachel Scott Decker, Greensboro, for North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
STATE v. Jane Brock WHALEY.

No. 440PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 12, 2007.

Phillip T. Jackson, Marion, Robert B. Long, Jr., William A. Parker, Asheville, Eric M. Lieberman, for Jane Brock Whaley.

Elizabeth L. McKay, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of October 2007 by Attorney General to Amend Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of October 2007."
# Political and Security Committee Decision EUFOR RCA/5/2014Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision EUFOR RCA/5/2014 of 24 July 2014 on the acceptance of third States' contributions            to the European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA) (2014/646/CFSP)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision EUFOR RCA/5/2014                     

# of 24 July 2014

# on the acceptance of third States' contributions to the European Union military operation in the Central African Republic                        (EUFOR RCA)                     

# (2014/646/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2014/73/CFSP of 10 February 2014 on a European Union military operation in the Central African                           Republic (EUFOR RCA)(1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2014/73/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take                              the relevant decisions on acceptance of proposed contributions by third States.

(2)Following the recommendation on a contribution from Serbia by the EUFOR RCA Operation Commander and the advice from the European                              Union Military Committee, the contribution from Serbia should be accepted.

(3)In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to                              the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation                              of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

1.The contribution from Serbia to the European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA) is accepted                        and is considered to be significant.                  

2.Serbia is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUFOR RCA.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2014.

*For the Political and Security Committee*                            

*The Chairperson*                            

W. Stevens                            

1

OJ L 40, 11.2.2014, p. 59.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER

I, Carl Iberger, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Precipio, Inc. (the Registrant); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | /s/ CARL IBERGER                                     
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Carl Iberger                                         
| | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)



Date: April 7, 2020
STATE of North Carolina v. Donnavan Keith BLAIR.

No. 81P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Linda B. Weisel, Raleigh, for Blair.

Kevin L. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 638 S.E.2d 914.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 6th day of February 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of February 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
IN RE J.D.W.

No. COA07-1010.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Nash (05JA173).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
HASSELL v. BOARD OF EDUCATION.

No. 172A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2007.

Ralph T. Bryant, Jr., Havelock, for Hassell.

Gary Scarzafava, Assistant Attorney General, for Board of Education.

George W. Lennon, Raleigh, for NCATL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of June 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Onslow County Board of Education) shall have up to and including the 20th day of July 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of June 2007."