alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-
QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
<S>                           <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-31-1999          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                APR-01-1998          APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1998          DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                782               17,610
<SECURITIES>                        9,274                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                       5,166 <F1>           3,720 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                            0                    0
<INVENTORY>                         6,779                3,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   23,551               25,507
<PP&E>                              6,641 <F1>           2,254 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                          0                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     30,385               27,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               7,090                6,340
<BONDS>                               188                  108
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0                    0
<PREFERRED>                             0                    0
<COMMON>                                8                    7
<OTHER-SE>                         33,941               31,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       30,385               27,761
<SALES>                            14,627                7,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   16,801               11,013
<CGS>                              11,000                5,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      13,345                7,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    3,125 <F2>           1,265 <F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    101                  159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,270)                   95
<INCOME-TAX>                            0                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,270)                   95
<DISCONTINUED>                          0                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0                    0
<CHANGES>                               0                    0
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,270)                   95
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.17) <F3>            0.02 <F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.17)                 0.02

<FN>
<F1> Item shown net of allowance, consistent with the balance
     sheet presentation.
<F2> Item consists of research and development.
<F3> Item consists of basic earnings per share.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
STATE v. SILER.

No. COA07-328.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 5, 2008.

Certification Date February 25, 2008.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS74756).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
<PAGE>

                               Exhibit 11

                   PAULA FINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
        COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED  NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                       SEPTEMBER 30        SEPTEMBER 30   
                                      1996       1997     1996      1997
                                     -------   -------  --------  -------
<S>                                  <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
Net Income                           $  943    $ 1,271  $ 3,006    $3,565
                                     -------   -------  -------   -------
                                     -------   -------  -------   -------

Weighted average shares 
 outstanding during the period         1,893     1,902   1,893      1,902
Common stock equivalents - primary     2,156     2,217   2,156      2,217
                                     -------   -------  -------   -------
Common and common stock 
 equivalent shares outstanding 
 for purpose of calculating 
 primary net earnings per share        4,049     4,119   4,049      4,119

Incremental shares to reflect 
 full dilution                            56       153      56        153
                                     -------   -------  -------   -------

Total shares for purposes of 
 calculating fully diluted 
 net earnings per share                4,105     4,272   4,105      4,272
                                     -------   -------  -------   -------
                                     -------   -------  -------   -------

Primary earnings per share           $  0.23   $  0.31  $  0.74   $  0.87
                                     -------   -------  -------   -------
                                     -------   -------  -------   -------

Fully diluted earnings per share     $  0.23   $  0.30  $  0.73     $0.83
                                     -------   -------  -------   -------
                                     -------   -------  -------   ------- 
</TABLE>

                                      13
cc: Hon. Kimberly A. Wanker, District Judge 

Laksmi Nashringa Braithwaite 

Nye County District Attorney 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Nye County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(01 1947A 

.57g110,:;TA:Ltftgatri,r irigEkr -S41.13140,44:44tvenilaek.nt;etgati=t,14 wtexami,ndornp4,-Par
In the Matter of B.M.

No. 509P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 16, 2007.

E. Marshall Woodall, Lillington, for Harnett County DSS.

Peter Wood, for Mother.

Richard Croutharmel, for Father.

Pamela N. Williams, for Guardian ad Litem.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of October 2007 by Petitioner for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of October 2007."
EXHIBIT
23.1






Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







As
independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-46939 and
333-50767 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 29, 2009, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Star Buffet, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
January 26, 2009 and January 28, 2008 and for the fiscal years then ended,
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 26,
2009.







/s/ MAYER
HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C.







Mayer
Hoffman McCann P.C.




Phoenix,
Arizona


April 29,
2009
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------




                        CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE><CAPTION>

                                                                   Year ended December 31,
                                                       ------------------------------------------------
                                                          1999               1998               1997
                                                       ----------         ----------         ----------
<S>                                                    <C>                <C>                <C>

CANADIAN GAAP
-------------
Net loss for the year                                 $ 9,669,951        $(8,673,172)       $(2,995,559)
Weighted average number of common shares o/s
  for the year                                          9,564,501         22,952,233         17,979,443
Loss per share is net loss divided by
  weighted average # o/s                              $     (0.36)       $     (0.38)       $     (0.17)


US GAAP
-------
Net loss for the year                                 $ 9,669,951        $(8,756,755)       $(2,996,976)
Weighted average number of common shares o/s
  during the year                                      27,093,742         22,952,233         17,979,443
Loss per share is net loss divided by
  weighted average # o/s                              $     (0.36)       $     (0.38)       $     (0.17)
Pro-forma loss for the year                          $(10,524,171)       $(8,965,696)       $(5,745,103)
Pro-forma loss per share is pro-forma loss
  divided by weighted average # o/s                   $     (0.39)       $     (0.39)       $     (.032)
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

WENDALL D. JONES,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00197-CR

Appeal from the

226th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2021-CR-2720)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 113/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 113/2013 of 7 February 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 113/2013                     

# of 7 February 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 19 (Monday, January 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 4815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1672]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA

ACTION: Meeting notice for the Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory 
Committee under Section 205 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with section 10(a)(2) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Meeting notice is hereby given 
for the Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory Committee pursuant to Section 
205 of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 
2000, Public Law 106-393. Topics to be discussed include: general 
information, proposed new Title II projects, updates on current Title 
II projects, and next meeting dates and agendas.

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 15, 2005, beginning at 6 
p.m. and ending at approximately 9 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Scott County Court house, 
100 W. First Street, Waldron, AR 71958.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caroline Mitchell, Committee 
Coordinator, USDA, Ouachita National Forest, P.O. Box 1270, Hot 
Springs, AR 71902. (501-321-5318).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff, Committee members, and 
elected officials. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the 
attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff before or after the meeting. A public input session 
will be provided, and individuals who made written requests by February 
14, 2005, will have the opportunity to address the committee at that 
session. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send 
their names and proposals to Bill Pell, DFO, P.O. Box 1270, Hot 
Springs, AR 71902.

    Dated: January 20, 2005.
Bill Pell,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-1672 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-52-M
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 23(a)

                     INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Nos. 333-34561, 333-34587, 333-34589, 333-34591, 333-34593, 333-34683,
333-35689, 333-47911, 333-51081, 333-74463, 333-74465, 333-32112 and
333-39972 of Solutia Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement
Nos. 333-75812, 333-89818, and 333-99705 of Solutia Inc. on Form S-3 of our
report dated March 15, 2004 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes explanatory paragraphs referring to Solutia Inc.'s filing for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code,
substantial doubt about Solutia Inc.'s ability to continue as a going
concern and changes in accounting principles), appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Solutia Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Saint Louis, Missouri
March 15, 2004
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 11

                      FLEMINGTON PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

                         EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION

                (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

                                                              YEAR ENDED
                                                             JULY 31, 1998
                                                       -------------------------

                                                                 BASIC
                                                       -------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding                                   3,491,637
Dilutive effect of stock performance plans (1)                               --
                                                       -------------------------
     Total                                                            3,491,637

Net loss                                                                  (708)
                                                       -------------------------

Earnings per share                                                        (.20)
                                                       -------------------------

                                                              YEAR ENDED
                                                             JULY 31, 1997
                                                       -------------------------

                                                                 BASIC
                                                       -------------------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                                   2,597,300
Dilutive effect of stock performance plans (1)                               --
                                                       -------------------------
     Total                                                            2,597,300

Net loss                                                                  (411)
                                                       -------------------------

Earnings per share                                                        (.16)
                                                       -------------------------





(1)      Since the company has reported a loss for each period, no potential
         shares from stock performance plans have been presented, as their
         effect would be anti-dilutive.
PENN v. TOWN OF WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH

No. COA06-502

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from New Hanover (04CVS4220).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3294 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3294


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2008

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To provide for the continued performance of the functions of the United 
                       States Parole Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Parole Commission 
Extension Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF SENTENCING REFORM ACT OF 1984.

    For purposes of section 235(b) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 
(18 U.S.C. 3551 note; Public Law 98-473; 98 Stat. 2032), as such 
section relates to chapter 311 of title 18, United States Code, and the 
United States Parole Commission, each reference in such section to ``21 
years'' or ``21-year period'' shall be deemed a reference to ``24 
years'' or ``24-year period'', respectively.

            Passed the Senate July 21, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
STATE of North Carolina v. Vernelle Lafarris BULLOCK, Sr.

No. 445P02-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2006.

Daniel R. Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Vernelle Lafarris Bullock, Sr.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: 171 N.C.App. 763, 615 S.E.2d 337.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 23rd day of August 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of August 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Tony Wayne DORTON.

No. 514P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Daniel F. Read, Durham, for Dorton.

Laura J. Gendy, Assistant Attorney General, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 641 S.E.2d 357.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6441

WAYNE STEVEN TIPPETT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN MCCALL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (1:09-cv-00593-HMH)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Steven Tippett, Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, RILEY, 

POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Steven Tippett seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Tippett has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED