alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS AMENDED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,137
<SECURITIES>                                     4,534
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,776
<PP&E>                                           1,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                      65
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           10,471
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,194)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,819
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,865)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,865)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.87)


</TABLE>
STATE v. FREEMAN.

No. COA07-175.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Columbus (06CRS50036).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6747

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSE LUIS ACEVEDO,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:92-cr-00427-JCC-1; 1:97-cv-02080-AVB)

Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 20, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Luis Acevedo, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Alicia J. 

Yass, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Luis Acevedo seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Acevedo has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE v. YOUNG.

No. COA06-1680.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 16, 2007.

Certification Date November 5, 2007.

Appeal from Granville (05CRS52410).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed and remanded in part for correction of the order revoking probation.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3718 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3718

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend the taxation of 
                 unemployment compensation for 2 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 8 (legislative day, November 20), 2008

   Ms. Snowe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend the taxation of 
                 unemployment compensation for 2 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Unemployment Benefit Tax Suspension 
Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF TAX ON UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 85 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to unemployment compensation) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Temporary Suspension.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to 
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2007, and before January 1, 
2010.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN RE W.G.

No. COA07-921.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 18, 2007.

Certification Date January 7, 2008.

Appeal from Alexander (06J28, 06J29, 06J30).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
S. 3641 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To authorize funding for the National Crime Victim Law Institute to provide support 

for victims of crime under Crime Victims Legal Assistance Programs as a part 

of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION. 

Section 103(b) of the Justice for All Act of 2004 (Public Law 

108–405; 118 Stat. 2264) is amended in paragraphs (1) through 

(5) by striking ‘‘2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009’’ each place it appears 

and inserting ‘‘2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.**

**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Scott H. Rechler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director**

**of Reckson Associates Realty Corp.,**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

I, Scott H. Rechler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Office and Director of Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|   | 1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: November 8, 2006 |   |     |
|-------------------------|--------|----------|
|                         |   | By  | /s/ Scott H. Rechler |
|                    |   |     |  

 

 

Scott H. Rechler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reckson Associates Realty Corp. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Lauren P. Silvernail, hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                               
|------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Lauren P. Silvernail                                                                                      
|                   |  |  |  | Lauren P. Silvernail Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Accounting Officer & Vice President, Corporate Development
STATE of North Carolina v. Dwight McDOUGALD.

No. 64A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Irving Joyner, Durham, for McDougald.

John P. Scherer, II, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: 181 N.C.App. 41, 638 S.E.2d 546.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 2nd day of February 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."

"Defendant's petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is allowed with respect to defendant's argument that his appeal of his jury conviction for conspiracy to traffick by possessing 100 or more but less than 500 dosage of methylenediox-yamphetamine was not in violation of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. The remainder of defendant's petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is denied. By Order of the Court in Conference, this 11th day of October, 2007."
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1074/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1074/2014 of 9 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in Union            waters of VIId by vessels flying the flag of Belgium         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1074/2014                     

# of 9 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in Union waters of VIId by vessels flying the flag of Belgium

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-19-1997
<CASH>                                          84,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,075
<INVENTORY>                                     14,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,838
<PP&E>                                         953,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                 283,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,011,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           902
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,011,750
<SALES>                                         45,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,638
<CGS>                                           42,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   907
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       559
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,639)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  25,277
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,638
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheets and unaudited condensed statements of
income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to
date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         260,204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     38,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               778,252
<PP&E>                                      23,169,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,385,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,397,631
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         3,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  7,240,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,426,355)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,385,939
<SALES>                                      3,200,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,200,891
<CGS>                                          643,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  643,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,413,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             758,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,615,248)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,615,248)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,615,248)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.52)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



The following list sets forth the direct and indirect subsidiaries of the registrant as of March 15, 2004 and their
respective jurisdictions of incorporation or organization:



|                               |  |                       
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|SUBSIDIARY                     |  | JURISDICTION          
|Vert Tech LLC                  |  | Delaware              
|Verticalnet Africa Pty Ltd.    |  | South Africa          
|Verticalnet Ltd                |  | Israel                
|VNI Holdings Inc.              |  | Delaware              
|Verticalnet Solutions Ltd.     |  | England and Wales     
|Verticalnet International LLC. |  | Delaware              
|Verticalnet Europe B.V.        |  | Amsterdam, Netherlands
|BT Fifty Five                  |  | England and Wales     
|Verticalnet Ltd.               |  | England and Wales     
|Verticalnet Europe Ltd.        |  | England and Wales     
|Verticalnet UK Employees Ltd.  |  | England and Wales     
|Atlas Commerce, Inc.           |  | Delaware              
|Verticalnet Software, Inc.     |  | Delaware              
|Atlas Commerce Ltd.            |  | England and Wales     
|Tigris I Corp.                 |  | Delaware
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50781 Summary Calendar

JESUS ALBERTO CABAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; ROBERT MEULLER, III, The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations; JANET RENO, Former U.S. Attorney General; LOUIS J. FREEH, Former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-02-CV-103

-------------------- March 7, 2003 Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesus Alberto Cabal appeals from the dismissal of his civil suit in which he raised claims under various theories of liability, including the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552; the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2674; and 42No. 02-50781 -2- U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985, and 2000e. Cabal's claims are premised on his contention that the defendants have engaged in a conspiracy to deprive him of his constitutional rights for over twenty years. Cabal contended that the conspiracy has included constant 24-hour surveillance by government officials and efforts to influence the outcomes of civil litigation in which Cabal was a plaintiff. Cabal alleged that those efforts included the issuance of executive orders by former Presidents Reagan, Bush, and Clinton directly suspending his civil rights. Cabal has raised similar claims in other litigation against the Government.
See , e.g. , Cabal v. Dep't of Justice , 1992 WL 336447 (8th Cir. Nov. 18, 1992). A review of the record shows that the district court did not err in determining that Cabal's claims were either barred by res judicata or by the failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
See Ellis v. Amex Life Ins. Co. , 211 F.3d 935, 937 (5th Cir. 2000); Voinche v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation , 999 F.2d 962, 963 (5th Cir. 1993); Williamson v. U.S. Dep't of Agric. , 815 F.2d 368, 378 (5th Cir. 1987); 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). Further, Cabal's conspiracy allegations are conclusional and insufficient to state a claim for relief. See Young v. Biggers , 938 F.2d 565, 569 (5th Cir. 1991); Morrison v. City of Baton Rouge , 761 F.2d 242, 246 (5th Cir. 1985). To the extent that Cabal attempts to rely on exhibits in his appendix that were not submitted to the district court, we do notNo. 02-50781 -3- consider new evidence furnished for the first time on appeal.
See Theriot v. Parish of Jefferson , 185 F.3d 477, 491 n.26 (5th Cir. 1999). Cabal also asserts that he has a viable cause of action against the individual defendants under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Because he did not raise this issue in the district court, we do not consider Cabal's claim. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED.