alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# The Plant Health (England) (Amendment) Order 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

E+W+S

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 23

Plant Health, England

# The Plant Health (England) (Amendment) Order 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

14th January 2013

Laid before Parliament

16th January 2013

Coming into force

17th January 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Instrument revoked (1.7.2015) by The Plant Health (England) Order 2015 (S.I. 2015/610), **Sch. 18**

## F1EXPLANATORY NOTE                  

(This note is not part of the Order)

This Order amends the Plant Health (England) Order 2005 (S.I. 2005/2530) (“the principal order”).                  

Article 2(2) makes minor amendments to the matters which are required to be notified under article 19(4) of the principal                     order. Certain matters are no longer required to be included in the notification.                  

Article 2(3) makes provision to prohibit a person from landing in England certain plants which have been grown or are suspected                     to have been grown in another member State or in Switzerland, unless prior written notification has been given to an authorised                     inspector.                  

Article 2(4) makes minor amendments to article 22 of the principal order to reflect paragraph numbering.

A preliminary assessment of the impact of article 2(3) on business, the voluntary sector and the public sector is included                     in the Explanatory Memorandum for this instrument, which is available alongside the instrument on www.legislation.gov.uk. No separate impact assessment for article 2(2) of this instrument has been produced as no impact on business, the voluntary                     sector or the public sector is foreseen.
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the
three month period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:





(1)  The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMSDouglas P. Williams Chief Financial Officer





August 12, 2002
Exhibit 21









Subsidiaries of the Company
as of December 31, 2008
  Centerline
Holding Company, a Delaware statutory trust
  Centerline
Capital Group Inc., a Delaware corporation
  Centerline/AC
Investors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
   Subsidiaries of Centerline
Capital Group Inc.
  Centerline
Capital Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
  Centerline
Mortgage Capital Inc., a Delaware Corporation
   Subsidiary of Centerline
Capital Company LLC
  Centerline
Affordable Housing Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company
   Subsidiary of Centerline/AC
Investors LLC
  Centerline
Investors I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 166 (Monday, August 29, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51041-51042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7961-5]


Notice of Termination of Environmental Impact Statement for the 
Comprehensive Port Improvement Plan Within the Port of New York and New 
Jersey (PONYNJ)

AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers (USACE), and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) acting as 
Federal co-lead agencies.

SUMMARY: The Federal co-lead agencies, EPA, USACE, FHWA are canceling 
the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the 
Comprehensive Port Improvement Plan (CPIP-EIS) for the PONYNJ. As 
originally planned, the CPIP and CPIP-EIS would define economically 
viable and environmentally sound Port facilities and associated 
transportation network improvement initiatives to the year 2060; 
consider separate, ongoing, and planned environmental enhancements to 
natural resources of the Port and associated transportation network; 
incorporate Green Port principles to the maximum extent practicable; 
and evaluate, avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse environmental 
effects. EPA, on behalf of all three Federal co-lead agencies, 
published a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS for the CPIP in the 
Federal Register (68 FR 19207, April 18, 2003). The three federal co-
lead agencies conducted several public scoping meetings in December 
2003 and January 2004.

[[Page 51042]]

    The CPIP presents an array of conceptual long-term port improvement 
scenarios, some of which would involve future federal activities were 
they to be advanced to the status of a real project. Any future port-
improvement projects involving federal actions, as defined under NEPA, 
would be required to undergo the applicable environmental review 
process. Given the considerable time period before the conceptual 
improvements identified in the CPIP Plan would become actual proposed 
projects with sponsors, a detailed environmental review and analysis, 
as conducted in an EIS, is not warranted at this time. As a result, the 
Federal co-lead agencies are canceling the EIS process. In the short-
term, a programmatic analysis in the form of an Environmental 
Assessment will be prepared to identify what type of environmental 
review could be expected of any improvement projects that may be 
proposed. This programmatic Environmental Assessment will be available 
for public review in Fall 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grace Musumeci, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, (212) 637-3738; Bryce Wisemiller, U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers, (917) 790-8307; Richard E. Backlund, Federal Highway 
Administration, (212) 668-2205.

    Dated: August 4, 2005.
Kathleen C. Callahan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 05-17125 Filed 8-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Guidant Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Ronald W. Dollens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald W. DollensChief
Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial
information extracted from Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2000 and is
qualified in is entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                            31,723
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                     60,385
<ALLOWANCES>                      (2,157)
<INVENTORY>                       23,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 127,331
<PP&E>                           323,378
<DEPRECIATION>                  (177,570)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   294,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             57,643
<BONDS>                          149,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                             226
<OTHER-SE>                       (45,072)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     294,947
<SALES>                          181,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 181,033
<CGS>                            153,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    153,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                11,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    1,841
<INCOME-TAX>                        (403)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                2,244
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       2,244
<EPS-BASIC>                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .10


</TABLE>
| (1)  |  the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,      2009 (“the Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));and |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  |  the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                 |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ JOHN      C. COREY                          |   |
|   |   | John      C. Corey                                   |   |
|   |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Director |   |
|   |   | March      15, 2010                                  |   |

----
STATE v. Darrell Wayne MANESS.

No. 402A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 30, 2007.

Rex Gore, District Attorney, Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of July 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Serve Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 13th day of August 2007 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of July 2007."
STATE v. PETTIS.

No. COA06-1380.

Court of appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 18, 2007.

Certification Date October 8, 2007.

Appeal from Cleveland (04CRS50124, 04CRS50125, 04CRS50126).

Case reported without published opinion No prejudicial error.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arthur G. Dauber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of American Electric Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of American Electric Technologies, Inc.

March 31, 2008



By:

/s/    ARTHUR G. DAUBERArthur G. DauberPrincipal Executive Officer


I, John H. Untereker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of American Electric Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of American Electric Technologies, Inc.

March 31, 2008



By:

/s/    JOHN H. UNTEREKERJohn H. UnterekerPrincipal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m., Wednesday, September 7, 2005.

# PLACE:

NTSB Board Room, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# STATUS:

The two items are Open to the Public.

7565A Safety Study: Risk Factors Associated With Weather-Related General Aviation Accidents.

7650A Aviation Accident Report—Crash During Landing, Executive Airlines Flight 5401, Avions de Transport Regional 72-212, N438AT, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 9, 2004.

# NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Ms. Carolyn Dargan at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, September 2, 2005.

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived Web cast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *http://www.ntsb.gov*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: August 26, 2005.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-17340 Filed 8-26-05; 1:28 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, John Buono, Chief Financial Officer of Assisted Living Concepts, Inc., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.(“Registrant”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ John Buono     John Buono    Chief Financial Officer    August 10, 2007
STATE v. GRAHAM.

No. COA06-1695.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from New Hanover (06CRS52203, 06CRS52204).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 22, 2012

h1015 

# Order

October 22, 2012

145200 & (17)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145200

COA: 306732

Wayne CC: 07

- 020805

- FC

JOHN L. NORRIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 2, 2012 order of

the Court of Appeals is c onsidered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to

remand is DENIED.
exhibit1014to711168k







1 Capital Structure – Pre Conversion Assumptions: Shown before any contemplated stock split Rant preffereds equal to the amount necessary to provide 22% ownership if only they convert Accrued Interest and Accrued Dividends are calculated as of 8/15/16   Note:  Post Debt/equity swap of $7MM of Preferreds on 5/9 Exclude warrants held by RFXS that are materially out of the money and highly unlikely to be exercised Current Proforma % RFXS Debt and Accrued Interest (To be Subordinated) $31.6 $31.6 RFXS Preferreds & Accrued Dividend $4.7 $4.7 Rant Note (Subordinated) – $3.0 Rant Preferred – $4.4 Dominion Debentures (Senior Secured) – $4.4 Domi i n Warrants – $2.2 RFXS (Shares) 39,598,536 39,598,536 65.5% Public (Shares) 20,878,176 20,892,022 34.5% Rant Preferreds (Shares) – – 0.0% Rant Note (Shares) – – 0.0% Dominion (Shares) – – 0.0% Total Debt, Preferreds & Warrants  ($MM) $36.2 $50.3 Total Outstanding Shares 60,476,712 60,490,558 100.0%





 






2 Capital Structure – Post Conversion Assumptions: Dominion Debentures & Warrants convert @ $0.26 RFXS Debt & Preferreds convert @ $0.26 Rant Note converts @ $0.26 Assumes Rant preferreds previously converted but adjusts to 22% upon RFXS conversion Accrued Interest and Accrued Dividends assumes a 8/15/16 conversion Shown before any contemplated stock split   Note:  Post Debt/equity swap of $7MM of Preferreds on 5/9 Exclude warrants held by RFXS that are materially out of the money and highly unlikely to be exercised Current Proforma % RFXS Debt and Accrued Interest (To be Subordinated) $31.6 – RFXS Preferreds & Accrued Dividend $4.7 – Rant Note (Subordinated) $3.0 – Rant Preferred $4.4 – Dominion Debentures (Senior Secured) $4.4 – Dominio  Warrants $2.2 – RFXS (Shares) 39,598,536 178,968,854 58.9% Public (Shares) 20,892,022 20,892,022 6.9% Rant Preferreds (Shares) – 66,937,589 22.0% Rant Note (Shares) – 11,538,462 3.8% Dominion (Shares) – 25,641,023 8.4% Total Debt, Preferreds & Warrants  ($MM) $50.3 – Total Outstanding Shares 60,490,558 303,977,949 100.0%
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8153** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SYLVESTER KELLY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis trict of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00297

- CMH

- 3 )

Submitted : March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5 , 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Sylvester Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Karen Ledbetter Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Dennis Michael Fitzpatrick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sylvester Kelly appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s earlier order ruling on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewe d the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Goodwyn , 596 F.3d 233, 234

- 46 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court lacked authority to grant defendant’s motion to reconsider, filed eight months after the di strict court’s order ruling on original § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED