Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Notices 52447 

3Commissioner Marcia E. Miller dissenting. 

antidumping findings on sugar from 

Belgium, France, and Germany would 

not be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time.3

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

reviews on September 1, 2004 (69 FR 

53466) and determined on December 6, 

2004 that it would conduct full reviews 

(69 FR 75568, December 17, 2004). 

Notice of the scheduling of the 

Commission’s reviews and of a public 

hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 

5480). The hearing was held in 

Washington, DC, on June 28, 2005, and 

all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these reviews to the 

Secretary of Commerce on August 29, 

2005. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 3793 

(August 2005), entitled Sugar from the 

European Union, and Sugar from 

Belgium, France, and Germany: 

Investigation Nos. 104-TAA–7 (Second 

Review) and AA1921–198–200 (Second 

Review). 

Issued: August 29, 2005. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 05–17489 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Executive Office for Immigration 

Review 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Application 

for Cancellation of Removal (42a) for 

Certain Permanent Residents; (42b) and 

Adjustment of Status for Certain 

Nonpermanent Residents. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Executive Office for Immigration 

Review (EOIR) has submitted the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection is published to 

obtain comments from the public and 

affected agencies. This proposed 

information collection was previously 

published in the Federal Register 

Volume 70, Number 110, page 33762 on 

June 9, 2005, allowing for a 60-day 

comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until October 3, 2005. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. Written comments and 

suggestions from the public and affected 

agencies concerning the proposed 

collection of information are 

encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Revision of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Application for Cancellation of Removal 

(42a) for Certain Permanent Residents; 

(42b) and Adjustment of Status for 

Certain Nonpermanent Residents. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Form Number: EOIR–42A, EOIR–42B. 

Executive Office for Immigration 

Review, United States Department of 

Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: Individual aliens 

determined to be removable from the 

United States. Other: None. Abstract: 

This information collection is necessary 

to determine the statutory eligibility of 

individual aliens who have been 

determined to be removable from the 

United States for cancellation of their 

removal, as well as to provide 

information relevant to a favorable 

exercise of discretion. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: It is estimated that 

11,000 respondents will complete the 

form annually with an average of 5 

hours, 45 minutes per response. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 

64,130 total annual burden hours 

associated with this collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Brenda E. Dyer, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, 

Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: August 29, 2005. 

Brenda E. Dyer, 

Department Clearance Officer, Department of 

Justice. 

[FR Doc. 05–17462 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment Standards Administration 

Wage and Hour Division 

Minimum Wages for Federal and 

Federally Assisted Construction; 

General Wage Determination Decisions 

General wage determination decisions 

of the Secretary of Labor are issued in 

accordance with applicable law and are 

based on the information obtained by 

the Department of Labor from its study 

of local wage conditions and data made 

available from other sources. They 

specify the basic hourly wage rates and 

fringe benefits which are determined to 

be prevailing for the described classes of 

laborers and mechanics employed on 

construction projects of a similar 

52448 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Notices 

character and in the localities specified 

therein. 

The determinations in these decisions 

of prevailing rates and fringe benefits 

have been made in accordance with 29 

CFR part 1, by authority of the Secretary 

of Labor pursuant to the provisions of 

the Davis-Bacon Act of March 3, 1931, 

as amended (46 Stat. 1494, as amended, 

40 U.S.C. 276a) and of other Federal 

statutes referred to in 29 CFR part 1, 

Appendix, as well as such additional 

statutes as may from time to time be 

enacted containing provisions for the 

payment of wages determined to be 

prevailing by the Secretary of Labor in 

accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act. 

The prevailing rates and fringe benefits 

determined in these decisions shall, in 

accordance with the provisions of the 

foregoing statutes, constitute the 

minimum wages payable on Federal and 

federally assisted construction projects 

to laborers and mechanics of the 

specified classes engaged on contract 

work of the character and in the 

localities described therein. 

Good cause is hereby found for not 

utilizing notice and public comment 

procedure thereon prior to the issuance 

of these determinations as prescribed in 

5 U.S.C. 553 and not providing for delay 

in the effective date as prescribed in that 

section, because the necessity to issue 

current construction industry wage 

determinations frequently and in large 

volume causes procedures to be 

impractical and contrary to the public 

interest. 

General wage determination 

decisions, and modifications and 

supersedeas decisions thereto, contain 

no expiration dates and are effective 

from the date of notice in the Federal 

Register, or the date written notice is 

received by the agency, whichever is 

earlier. These decisions are to be used 

in accordance with the provisions of 29 

CFR parts 1 and 5. Accordingly, the 

applicable decision, together with any 

modifications issued, must be made a 

part of every contract for performance of 

the described work within the 

geographic area indicated as required by 

an applicable Federal prevailing wage 

law and 29 CFR Part 5. The wage rates 

and fringe benefits, notice of which is 

published herein, and which are 

contained in the Government Printing 

Office (GPO) document entitled 

‘‘General Wage Determinations Issued 

Under The Davis-Bacon And Related 

Acts,’’ shall be the minimum paid by 

contractors and subcontractors to 

laborers and mechanics. 

organization, or governmental agency 

having an interest in the rates 

determined as prevailing is encouraged 

to submit wage rate and fringe benefit 

information for consideration by the 

Department. 

Further information and selfexplanatory forms for the purpose of 

submitting this data may be obtained by 

writing to the U.S. Department of Labor, 

Employment Standards Administration, 

Wage and Hour Division, Division of 

Wage Determinations, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Room S–3014, 

Washington, DC 20210. 

Modification to General Wage 

Determination Decisions 

The number of decisions listed to the 

Government Printing Office document 

entitled ‘‘General Wage Determinations 

Issued Under the Davis-Bacon and 

related Acts’’ being modified are listed 

by Volume and State. Dates of 

publication in the Federal Register are 

in parentheses following the decision 

being modified. 

Volume I 

Massachusetts 

MA20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

MA20030002 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

MA20030017 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

MA20030018 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

New York 

NY20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NY20030007 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Rhode Island 

RI20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Volume II 

Pennsylvania 

PA20030008 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Volume III 

Georgia 

GA20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030006 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030022 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030032 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030033 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030036 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030040 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030050 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030055 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030058 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030066 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030073 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030078 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030084 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030085 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030086 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030087 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

GA20030088 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Mississippi 

MS20030050 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

MS20030055 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

MS20030056 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Volume IV 

Illinois 

IL20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Indiana 

IN20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IN20030002 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IN20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IN20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IN20030005 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IN20030006 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IN20030008 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IN20030012 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IN20030014 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Minnesota 

MN20030007 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Ohio 

OH20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030009 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030012 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030013 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030014 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030020 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030022 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030023 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030026 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030027 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030032 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030033 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030035 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

OH20030036 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Volume V 

Arkansas 

AR20030008 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

AR20030027 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Iowa 

IA20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IA20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IA20030005 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

IA20030008 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Louisiana 

LA20030005 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

LA20030015 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

LA20030034 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Nebraska 

NE20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NE20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NE20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NE20030005 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NE20030007 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NE20030009 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NE20030010 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NE20030011 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NE20030019 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NE20030021 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

New Mexico 

NM20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Volume VI 

Alaska 

AK20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

AK20030002 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

AK20030005 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

AK20030006 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

AK20030008 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Colorado 

CO20030012 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

CO20030013 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Idaho 

ID20030002 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Oregon 

OR20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Wyoming 

WY20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

WY20030002 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

WY20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

WY20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

WY20030005 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

WY20030009 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Volume VII 

Nevada 

NV20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NV20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NV20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Notices 52449 

NV20030005 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

NV20030009 (Jun. 13, 2003) 

General Wage Determination Publication 

General Wage determinations issued under 

the Davis-Bacon and related Acts, including 

those noted above, may be found in the 

Government Printing Office (GPO) document 

entitled ‘‘General Wage Determinations 

Issued Under The Davis-Bacon And Related 

Acts’’. This publication is available at each 

of the 50 Regional Government Depository 

Libraries and many of the 1,400 Government 

Depository Libraries across the country. 

General wage determinations issued under 

the Davis-Bacon And Related Acts are 

available electronically at no cost on the 

Government Printing Office site at http:// 

www.access.gpo.gov/davisbacon. They are 

also available electronically by subscription 

to the Davis-Bacon Online Service (http:// 

davisbacon.fedworld.gov) of the National 

Technical Information Service (NTIS) of the 

U.S. Department of Commerce at 1–800–363–

2068. This subscription offers value-added 

features such as electronic delivery of 

modified wage decisions directly to the 

user’s desktop, the ability to access prior 

wage decisions issued during the year, 

extensive Help Desk Support, etc. 

Hard-copy subscriptions may be purchased 

from: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. 

Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 

20402 (202) 512–1800. 

When ordering hard-copy subscription(s), 

be sure to specify the State(s) of interest, 

since subscriptions may be ordered for any 

or all of the six separate volumes, arranged 

by State. Subscriptions include an annual 

edition (issued in January or February) which 

includes all current general wage 

determinations for the States covered by each 

volume. Throughout the remainder of the 

year, regular weekly updates will be 

distributed to subscribers. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of 

August 2005. 

Shirley Ebbesen, 

Chief, Branch of Construction Wage 

Determinations. 

[FR Doc. 05–17335 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–27–M 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Mine Safety and Health Administration 

Petitions for Modification 

The petition for modification notice 

we published in the Federal Register on 

August 22, 2005 (70 FR 48984) had the 

wrong MSHA I.D. Number (15–28826) 

for the Hopkins County Coal, LLC, Elk 

Creek Mine, docket number M–2005–

059–C. The correct I.D. Number is 15–

18826. 

The following parties have filed 

petitions to modify the application of 

existing safety standards under section 

101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and 

Health Act of 1977. 

1. Bridger Coal Company 

[Docket No. M–2005–060–C] 

Bridger Coal Company, P.O. Box 68, 

Point of Rocks, Wyoming 82942 has 

filed a petition to modify the 

application of 30 CFR 75.1100–2(e)(2) 

(Quantity and location of firefighting 

equipment) to its Bridger Underground 

Mine (MSHA I.D. No. 48–01646) located 

in Sweetwater County, Wyoming. The 

petitioner requests a modification of the 

existing standard to permit the use of 

two portable fire extinguishers or one 

extinguisher having at least twice the 

minimum capacity in 30 CFR 75.1100–

1(e) at each temporary electrical 

installation at the Bridger Underground 

Mine. The petitioner asserts that the 

proposed alternative method would 

provide at least the same measure of 

protection as the existing standard. 

2. Andalex Resources, Inc. 

[Docket No. M–2005–061–C] 

Andalex Resources, Inc., P.O. Box 

902, Price, Utah 84501 has filed a 

petition to modify the application of 30 

CFR 75.500(d) (Permissible electric 

equipment) to its Aberdeen Mine 

(MSHA I.D. No. 42–02028) located in 

Carbon County, Utah. The petitioner 

requests a modification of the existing 

standard to permit the use of lowvoltage or battery-powered nonpermissible, electronic testing, 

diagnostic equipment or other, in or 

inby the last open crosscut under 

controlled conditions. The petitioner 

proposes to use the following 

equipment or other within 150 feet of 

pillar workings: Laptop computers, 

oscilloscopes, vibration analysis 

machines, cable fault detectors, point 

temperature probes, infrared 

temperature devices, insulation testers 

(meggers), voltage, current power 

measurement devices and recorders, 

pressure and flow measurement devices, 

battery drills, signal analyzer device, 

ultrasonic thickness gauges, electronic 

component testers, and electronic 

tachometers, other testing diagnostic 

equipment that may be approved by the 

MSHA District Office. The petitioner 

asserts that the proposed alternative 

method would provide at least the same 

measure of protection as the existing 

standard. 

3. Chino Mines Company 

[Docket No. M–2005–006–M] 

Chino Mines Company, P.O. Box 7, 

Hurley, New Mexico 88043 has filed a 

petition to modify the application of 30 

CFR 56.6309 (Fuel oil requirements for 

ANFO) to its Chino Mine (MSHA I.D. 

No. 29–00708) located in Grant County, 

New Mexico. The petitioner proposes to 

use recycled waste oil blended with 

diesel fuel to produce ammonium 

nitrate-fuel oil for use as a blasting 

agent. The petitioner asserts that the 

proposed alternative method would 

provide at least the same measure of 

protection as the existing standard. 

Request for Comments 

Persons interested in these petitions 

are encouraged to submit comments via 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov; e-mail: zzMSHAComments@dol.gov; Fax: (202) 693–

9441; or Regular Mail/Hand Delivery/ 

Courier: Mine Safety and Health 

Administration, Office of Standards, 

Regulations, and Variances, 1100 

Wilson Boulevard, Room 2350, 

Arlington, Virginia 22209. All 

comments must be postmarked or 

received in that office on or before 

October 3, 2005. Copies of these 

petitions are available for inspection at 

that address. 

Dated at Arlington, Virginia, this 26th day 

of August 2005. 

Rebecca J. Smith, 

Acting Director, Office of Standards, 

Regulations, and Variances. 

[FR Doc. 05–17478 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–43–P 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

Agency Forms Submitted for OMB 

Review 

Summary: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad 

Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 

the following proposal(s) for the 

collection of information to the Office of 

Management and Budget for review and 

approval. 

Summary of Proposal(s) 

(1) Collection title: Employee’s 

Certification. 

(2) Form(s) submitted: G–346. 

(3) OMB Number: 3220–0140. 

(4) Expiration date of current OMB 

clearance: 11/30/2005. 

(5) Type of request: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

(6) Respondents: Individuals or 

households. 

(7) Estimated annual number of 

respondents: 7,560. 

(8) Total annual responses: 7,560. 

(9) Total annual reporting hours: 630. 

(10) Collection description: Under 

Section 2 of the Railroad Retirement 

Act, spouses of retired railroad 

employees may be entitled to an 

annuity. The collection obtains 

information from the employee about