alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/                David A. Jackson                                                                  |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | David                A. JacksonChief                Financial OfficerNovember                8, 2006 |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight      Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.*

Back      to Form      10-Q
STATE of North Carolina v. Ronald Ray STARNER.

No. 498P02-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Ronald Ray Starner, pro se.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th day of July 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
| Name of Subsidiary                             |         | Jurisdiction in Which Organized or Incorporated |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |         |                                                                     |
| Consolidated Subsidiaries of Stoneridge, Inc.:           |         |                                                                     |
| Stoneridge Electronics AB                                |         | Sweden                                                                   |
| Stoneridge Electronics AS                                |         | Estonia                                                                  |
| Stoneridge Electronics Limited                           |         | Scotland, United Kingdom                                                 |
| Stoneridge International Financial Services Company      |         | Ireland                                                                  |
| Stoneridge Control Devices, Inc.                         |         | Massachusetts, United States                                             |
| Stoneridge Electronics, Inc.                             |         | Texas, United States                                                     |
| Alphabet de Mexico S.A. de C.V.                          |         | Mexico                                                                   |
| Alphabet de Mexico de Monclova S.A. de C.V.              |         | Mexico                                                                   |
| TED de Mexico S.A. de C.V.                               |         | Mexico                                                                   |
| Stoneridge Asia Pacific Electronics (Suzhou) Co. Limited |         | China                                                                    |
| Bolton Conductive Systems, LLC.                          |         | Michigan, United States                                                  |
|                                                     |         |                                                                     |
| Equity Method Investees of Stoneridge, Inc.:             |         |                                                                     |
| PST Eletrônica S.A.                                 |         | Brazil                                                                   |
| Minda Stoneridge Instruments Limited                     |    | India                                                                    |

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CELIA VICTORINA BENAVIDEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74325

Agency No. A094-454-970

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Celia Victorina Benavidez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming

an immigration judge’s decision finding her removable and denying her

FILED

APR 14 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-74325

applications for cancellation of removal and voluntary departure. We dismiss the

petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Benavidez’s contentions regarding her

conviction because she failed to exhaust the contentions before the BIA. See

Figueroa v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2008) (“The exhaustion doctrine

requires that the petitioner put the BIA on notice as to the specific issues so that the

BIA has an opportunity to pass on those issues.”) (internal quotations and

alterations omitted).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
STATE v. Eddie Lamar TAYLOR.

No. 719A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 2, 2008.

Daniel Shatz, Anne Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defenders, for Eddie Taylor.

William Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, Daniel P. O'Brien, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the third motion filed on the 21st day of December 2007 by State of NC for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. State of NC shall have up to and including the 18th day of January 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with *377this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 2nd day of January 2008."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3332 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3332

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to provide comprehensive health care to children of 
    Vietnam veterans born with Spina Bifida, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 24 (legislative day, July 23), 2008

  Mr. Bayh (for himself and Mr. Lugar) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to provide comprehensive health care to children of 
    Vietnam veterans born with Spina Bifida, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Spina Bifida Health Care Program 
Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS TO CHILDREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS BORN WITH SPINA 
              BIFIDA.

    (a) Provision of Comprehensive Health Care.--Section 1803(a) of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking ``such health care 
as the Secretary determines is needed by the child for the spina bifida 
or any disability that is associated with such condition'' and 
inserting ``health care under this section''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to care furnished after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.52


AMENDMENT NO. 11 dated as of February 1, 2016, 
to that Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2004 (the "Agreement") 
by and between KEVIN HYSON (the "Executive") and 
AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC. (the "Company").


Effective as of the date first written above, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


1.    Paragraph 1a of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore:


Employment Term.  The Company shall employ Executive until March 31, 2017 (the "Employment Term") on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement.  The Agreement shall be considered effective as of November 1, 2004 (the "Effective Time").


    
All other terms and conditions of Your Employment Agreement and any subsequent amendments of that Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect (unless modified above).


IN WITNESS WEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 11 as of the date first written above.
                                	
				
	AMERICAN MEDIA OPERATIONS, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ David Pecker
	 
	 

	 
	David Pecker
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Kevin Hyson
	 
	 

	 
	Kevin Hyson
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     7,816
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              3,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                               3,063
<INVENTORY>                                                1,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          10,448
<PP&E>                                                     6,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                             4,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            12,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      5,146
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                      20
<OTHER-SE>                                                 5,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              12,308
<SALES>                                                      987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           1,037
<CGS>                                                        833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (3,156)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (3,156)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (3,156)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (.16)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3559 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3559

   To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure that third party 
     review is available whenever health insurance coverage in the 
                    individual market is terminated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 24 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

  Mr. Coleman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure that third party 
     review is available whenever health insurance coverage in the 
                    individual market is terminated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continuing Coverage Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.

    Subpart 2 of part B of title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 300gg-51 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:

``SEC. 2754. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW IN THE CASE OF TERMINATION.

    ``(a) In General.--A health insurance issuer offering health 
insurance coverage in the individual market shall ensure that, with 
respect to an enrollee, independent, third-party review is provided 
through an appropriate entity where the issuer seeks to discontinue the 
health insurance coverage of such enrollee. The cost of such a review 
shall be paid by the issuer.
    ``(b) Notice.--Not later than 30 days prior to the date on which a 
health insurance issuer discontinues health insurance coverage for an 
enrollee, the issuer shall provide such enrollee with notice of the 
discontinuance. Such notice shall contain a statement of the enrollees 
right to an external review as required under subsection (a).
    ``(c) Submission of Review to Insurance Commissioner.--Upon 
completion of an external review provided for under this section, the 
determination with respect to the review shall be submitted to the 
insurance commissioner for the State involved. Such commissioner may 
approve the determination, overturn the determination, or require an 
additional independent review.
    ``(d) Preemption.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
preempt State laws that provide greater protections to enrollees than 
the protections provided by this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 51364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WO-300-1330-EO]


Notice of a 30-Day Public Comment Period To Affirm the Policy for 
the Standards To Establish the Potash Enclave as Used To Administer the 
Secretarial Order of 1986 Entitled ``Oil and Gas and Potash Leasing and 
Development Within the Designated Potash Area of Eddy and Lea Counties, 
New Mexico''

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice solicits public comments on the report which 
affirms the existing policy on the criteria used to establish the 
potash enclave.

DATES: Comments should be submitted to the address below no later than 
September 29, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Group Manager, Solid 
Minerals, 1620 L. St. NW., Mail Stop 501 LS, Washington DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Stewart, Mining Engineer, 1620 
L. St. NW., Mail Stop 501 LS, Washington, DC 20036, telephone (202) 
452-0310.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of the Interior (DOI) has a long history of 
administering the concurrent development of the oil and gas and potash 
deposits owned by the United States in Eddy and Lea counties, New 
Mexico. The BLM is the agency within the DOI responsible for these 
activities. There is an interest in exploring for oil and gas in parts 
of the area containing the potash reserves (potash enclave). The 
Secretarial Order (SO), published in the Federal Register dated October 
28, 1986 entitled, ``Oil and Gas and Potash Development within the 
Designated Potash Area of Eddy and Lea Counties,'' was developed to 
administer the development of these resources.

    The order, in Yates Petroleum Corp., et al., IBLA No. 92-612, 
was issued pursuant to an appeal filed by Yates Petroleum Corp., et 
al. concerning decisions to deny the approval to drill certain oil 
and gas wells by the BLM pursuant to the SO. In her opinion, the 
Administrative Law Judge stated, ``The record does not support a 
conclusion that the standards of four (4) feet of 10 percent 
K<INF>2</INF>O as sylvite and four (4) feet of 4 percent 
K<INF>2</INF>O as langbeinite, or a combination of the two, as 
defined by Van Sickle in 1974, continue to identify the thickness 
and quality of potash which is mineable under existing technology 
and economics'' as required by the SO. The BLM has the same concerns 
and prepared the report referenced in this notice.

II. Report, Entitled ``Potash Enclave Mineral Report''

    The report may be viewed at the following site on the Internet, 
http://www.blm.gov/nhp/300/wo320/potash.pdf. A hard copy may be 
requested from the contact for further information above.

Thomas Lonnie,
Assistant Director, Minerals, Realty and Resource Protection.
[FR Doc. 05-17176 Filed 8-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
# European Council Decision of 21 January 2014 appointing a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank (2014/37/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# European Council Decision

# of 21 January 2014

# appointing a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

# (2014/37/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 283(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and                           in particular Article 11.2 thereof,                        

Having regard to the recommendation of the Council of the European Union(1),                        

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),                        

Having regard to the opinion of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank(3),                        

Whereas:

(1)By letter dated 17 December 2013, the President of the European Central Bank, Mr Mario DRAGHI, announced the decision of Mr                              Jörg ASMUSSEN to resign from his position on the Executive Board prior to the end of his term of office on 31 December 2019.                              His resignation took effect on 7 January 2014. It is therefore necessary to appoint a new member of the Executive Board of                              the European Central Bank.

(2)The European Council wishes to appoint Ms Sabine LAUTENSCHLÄGER who, in its view, fulfils all the requirements set out in                              Article 283(2) of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Ms Sabine LAUTENSCHLÄGER is hereby appointed a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank for a term of office                     of eight years as from 27 January 2014.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall be published in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 21 January 2014.

*For the European Council*                            

*The President*                            

H. van Rompuy                            

1

OJ C 8, 11.1.2014, p. 1.                           

2

Opinion delivered on 16 January 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

3

Opinion delivered on 8 January 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Shirley Jean WEBB and Samuel Ashe Webb v. Ira M. HARDY, II, M.D.

No. 187P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Bruce Robinson, Wilmington, for Webb.

Robert D. Walker, Jr., Goldsboro, O. Drew Grice, Jr., for Hardy.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 641 S.E.2d 754.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of April 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 13, 2019

No. 04-19-00707-CV

JUBILEE ACADEMIC CENTER, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SCHOOL MODEL SUPPORT, LLC, D/B/A ATHLOS ACADEMIES,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-22759

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s record showing the appealed order 

has been signed in this case. We therefore order the court reporter, Debra Jimenez, to file the 

reporter’s record by December 13, 2019.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
STATE of North Carolina v. Eddie CAPLE.

No. 437A05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 7, 2008.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 185 N.C.App. ___, 650 S.E.2d 8 (2007), which, upon defendant's appeal from a judgment entered on 7 January 2004 by Judge B. Craig Ellis in Superior Court, Robeson County, remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing after being ordered by this Court to reconsider in light of *State v. Blackwell,* 361 N.C. 41, 638 S.E.2d 452 (2006), *cert. denied,* ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2281, 167 L.Ed.2d 1114 (2007), its previous decision to remand for resentencing. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 February 2008.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Paul F. Herzog, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Justice HUDSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. *See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk,* 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

AFFIRMED.