alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3110 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3110

  For the relief of Ruben Mkoian, Asmik Karapetian, and Arthur Mkoyan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2008

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Ruben Mkoian, Asmik Karapetian, and Arthur Mkoyan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR RUBEN MKOIAN, ASMIK 
              KARAPETIAN, AND ARTHUR MKOYAN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Ruben 
Mkoian, Asmik Karapetian, and Arthur Mkoyan shall each be eligible for 
the issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 
of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 
Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Ruben Mkoian, Asmik Karapetian, and 
Arthur Mkoyan enters the United States before the filing deadline 
specified in subsection (c), Ruben Mkoian, Asmik Karapetian, and Arthur 
Mkoyan shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully in the 
United States and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for the issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed, 
with appropriate fees, not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon granting an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Ruben Mkoian, Asmik 
Karapetian, and Arthur Mkoyan, the Secretary of State shall instruct 
the proper officer to reduce by 3, during the current or next following 
fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of birth of Ruben Mkoian, Asmik 
Karapetian, and Arthur Mkoyan under section 203(a) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Ruben Mkoian, Asmik Karapetian, and Arthur Mkoyan under section 202(e) 
of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000929547
<NAME> INKLINE PHARMACEUTICAL
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,870
<SECURITIES>                                     4,171
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,046
<PP&E>                                             481
<DEPRECIATION>                                     124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              625
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,403
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,983)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,983)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,983)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)


</TABLE>
1

The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1442

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Terrence Odell Watson, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: August 20, 2002

Filed: August 28, 2002

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Terrence Odell Watson (Watson) appeals his sentence. Watson pled guilty to

conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute in excess of 50 grams

of cocaine base and 125 grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A)

and 846. The presentence report assigned Watson five criminal history points under

U.S.S.G. § 4A1 (2001), resulting in a criminal history category of III, but the district

court1

 departed downward under section 4A1.3 to a criminal history category of II,
-2-

finding category III overstated the seriousness of Watson's past criminal conduct.

Although Watson's sentencing range was then 97-121 months, the amount of drugs

involved triggered a statutory mandatory minimum sentence of ten years

imprisonment. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1). 

Watson argues the district court should have departed downward to category I,

and he would then have been eligible for a sentence below the statutory mandatory

minimum sentence under the safety valve reduction of section 5C1.2. To qualify for

safety valve relief, a defendant may not be charged with more than one criminal

history point as determined under section 4A1.1. See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(1) &

application note 1. Because Watson was properly charged with five criminal history

points under section 4A1, he does not qualify for the safety valve reduction under

section 5C1.2. See United States v. Langmade, 236 F.3d 931, 932 (8th Cir. 2001);

United States v. Webb, 218 F.3d 877, 881-82 (8th Cir. 2000); see also United States

v. Heilmann, 235 F.3d 1146, 1148 (8th Cir. 2001).

We therefore affirm the sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
MARTIN v. MARTIN.

COA05-1662.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Catawba (92CVD2939).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Elaine R. Carbary, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MSB Financial, Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:

> a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
> registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
> 
> b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
> as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and
> 
> c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
> or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
> ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
> 
> b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2004

\s\Elaine R. Carbary

Elaine R. Carbary, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert Kaminski, Chief Executive Officer, of LEINER HEALTH PRODUCTSInc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best ofmy knowledge:

 

(1)                        The AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended March 26,2005, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)                        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: June 24, 2005      |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| /s/ Robert Kaminski            |   |
| Name: Robert Kaminski          |
| Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1261/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1261/2014 of 25 November 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1261/2014                     

# of 25 November 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
In The Matter of The WILL OF Hector Cornelius McFAYDEN. appealed by Propounder Mickey Jackson.

No. 576P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

George Freeman, Jr., Alexander C. Dale, Wilmington, for Mickey Jackson.

Randolph L. Worth, Raleigh, for Sherill.

Steven C. Lawrence, Fayetteville, for Simon & Mary Burney.

Jim Wade Goodman, Fayetteville, for Nunalee and Ransbotham.

Prior report: 179 N.C.App. 595, 635 S.E.2d 65.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 17th day of November 2006 by Caveators (Simon & Mary Burney) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."

HUDSON, J., recused.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1231/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1231/2014 of 17 November 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1231/2014                     

# of 17 November 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 November 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6909

BERNARDO FIGUEROA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT GRANT, Sussex I State Prison; G.

COOK, Sussex I State Prison,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department

of Corrections,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CA-03-609)

Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 19, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernardo Figueroa, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Bernardo Figueroa appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Figueroa v. Grant, No. CA-03-609 (E.D. Va. May 14, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Andrew R., an Infant. Department of Social Services, Respondent; Ilmars R., Appellant.

[798 NYS2d 917]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of abandonment, the father appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Orange County (Kiedaisch, J.), dated August 27, 2003, which, after a fact-finding hearing, terminated his parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to the Orange County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined, upon clear and convincing evidence, that the father abandoned the subject child during the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition. The father did not visit or contact the child, or establish that he was unable to do so, and neither the respondent nor the foster parents prevented or discouraged him from contacting the child during that period *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [5]; *Matter of Julius P.,*63 NY2d 477 [1984]; *Matter of Annette B.,*2 AD3d 721 [2003]; *Matter of Lee P.,*304 AD2d 760 [2003]; *Matter of Alexa Ray R.,*276 AD2d 703 [2000]; *see also Matter of Shaolin G.,*277 AD2d 312 [2000]). Furthermore, the Family Court properly concluded that termination of the father’s parental right was in the child’s best interests (see *Matter of Star Leslie*W., 63 NY2d 136, 148 [1984]). Adams, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. DESPERADOS, INC. and Cynthia L. Perez.

No. 629A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Jeffrey S. Miller, for Desperados & Perez.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 20th day of December 2006 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE 
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,922,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,799,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,576,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,520,000
<PP&E>                                     263,296,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,826,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             338,979,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,326,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       196,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 173,073,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               338,979,000
<SALES>                                     19,170,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,170,000
<CGS>                                        2,816,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,121,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,799,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,206,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   860,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,346,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,346,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        


</TABLE>