alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismiss; Opinion Filed January 16, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01105

- CV

MARJURITA D. KELLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF

THE ESTATE OF D’LISA M. KELLEY , Appellant V. THE CITY OF DALLAS, KEVIN MANSELL, AND A BIGAIL DOMINGUEZ , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 16

- 02799



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Bu rns , Justice Molberg , and Justice Nowell

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Since filing her notice of appeal on September 11, 2019, appellant has not communicated

with this Court or taken any further steps to prosecute the appeal. She has not paid the appell ate
filing fee and has not filed an affidavit indicating her inability to pay nor anything with this Court

asking for relief from inability to pay.

On October 22, 2019, the district clerk informed the Court the clerk’s record would not be

filed because app ellant had not paid the clerk’s fee. That same day, we directed appellant to file,

no later than November 1, 2019, written verification she had made arrangements to pay the fee or

was entitled to proceed without paying the fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a ). Although we

cautioned appellant that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the appeal without further– 2

–

notice, appellant has not complied. See id . 37.3(b). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id
., 42.3(b),(c).

191105F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MARJURITA D. KELLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF D’LISA M. KELLEY, Appellant

No. 05

- 19

- 01105

- CV V.

THE CITY OF DALLAS, KEVIN MANSELL, AND ABIGAIL DOMINGUEZ, Appellees On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 16

- 02799. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Molberg and Nowell part icipating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellees the City of Dallas, Kevin Mansell, and Abigail Dominguez recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Marjurita D. Kelley, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of D’Lisa M. Kelley.

Judgment entered this 16 th day of January, 2020.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,861
<SECURITIES>                                25,181,360
<RECEIVABLES>                                  585,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,688
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,780,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          581,986
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,198,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,780,033
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               331,087
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                298,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                   298,240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            298,240
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   298,240
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
BARNES v. DANCY.

No. COA07-79.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Greene (00CVD203).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------

Board of Directors
Pacific Biometrics, Inc.
Seattle, Washington



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the use of our audit report dated September 16, 2005, on the
financial statements of Pacific Biometrics, Inc., for the filing with and
attachment to the Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2005, and for
incorporation by referral in the Registration Statement of Pacific Biometrics,
Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-23497 and 333-109795).


/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.
-----------------------------------
Williams & Webster, P.S.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Spokane, Washington
September 28, 2005
STATE v. WILSON.

No. CO107-144.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Yancey (06CRS50642).

Case reported without published opinion No error.
POWER OF ATTORNEY AND SIGNATURES

         We, the  undersigned  offices and directors of American  Skiing Company
hereby  severally  constitute  and appoint  Christopher  E. Howard and Leslie B.
Otten, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to
them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities
indicated  below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed herewith and generally to
do all such things in our names and on our behalf in our  capacities  as offices
and directors to enable  American Skiing Company to comply with the provision of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and all  requirements  of the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,   hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  our
signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys,  or any of them, to said
Annual Report.

       Signature                 Title                             Date

                     Chairman  of the  Board of  Directors,
/s/ Leslie B. Otten  President and Chief Executive  Officer  October 26, 1998
-------------------  (Principal Executive Officer)
Leslie B. Otten

                            Senior Vice President, Chief
/s/ Christopher E. Howard   Administrative Officer, General
--------------------------  Counsel, Clerk and Chief         October 26, 1998
Christopher E. Howard       Financial Officer,      
                            (Principal Financial  Officer)


/s/ Joel B. Alvord
------------------------    Director                         October 26, 1998
Joel B. Alvord



--------------------------  Director                         October 26, 1998
Martel D. Wilson, Jr.


/s/ Gordon M. Gillies
--------------------------  Director                         October 26, 1998
Gordon M. Gillies



--------------------------- Director                         October 26, 1998
Christopher J. Nassetta
ACCEPTED

03-14-00416-CV

7359330

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

10/13/2015 4:41:30 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/13/2015 4:41:30 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Exhibit
32.2
 
 TELETOUCH
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
 
 OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. 1350)
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Douglas E. Sloan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his
knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      Report is in full compliances with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and
 
 2.        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 /s/ Douglas E.
      SloanDouglas
      E. SloanChief
      Financial OfficerDecember
      23, 2009
Exhibit 32.1
    CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (UNITED
STATES CODE, TITLE 18, CHAPTER 63, SECTION 1350)
 ACCOMPANYING
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KOF
 CENTERLINE
HOLDING COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
  
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Centerline Holding Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A (amendment No. 1)for the year
ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc D. Schnitzer, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company and I, Robert L. Levy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
  (1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of our Company.
  By:
                /s/ Marc D. Schnitzer
                
                By:
                /s/ Robert L. LevyMarc
      D. Schnitzer
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  (Principal
      Executive Officer)
                  April
      30, 2009
                
                
                Robert
      L. Levy
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
                  (Principal
      Financial Officer and
                  Principal
      Accounting Officer)
                  April
      30, 2009
   A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered November 12, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00611-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

KENNARD HENRY RICHARDS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-57714-X

ORDER

On October 20, 2015, this Court ordered court reporter Jan Cherie Williams to retrieve 

from the State and file all of the exhibits that were admitted into evidence during the suppression 

hearing. On October 26, 2015, Ms. Williams filed a supplemental record with all of the exhibits, 

except State’s Exhibit no. 2, an audio CD. Ms. Williams has not complied with the Court’s order 

by filing most of the exhibits.

Accordingly, we ORDER Jan Cherie Williams, official court reporter of the Criminal 

District Court No. 6, to file, by NOVEMBER 16, 2015, a supplemental record containing 

State’s Exhibit no. 2, an audio CD. If the exhibit is not filed by the date specified, the Court will 

order that Jan Cherie Williams not sit as a court reporter until she has filed the exhibit in this 

appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Jeanine Howard, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 6; Jan Cherie Williams, official court reporter, 

Criminal District Court No. 6; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
GROVE v. BAR CONST. CO., INC.

No. COA06-1412.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. 278724).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, remanded in part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Lassen Resource Advisory Committee, Susanville, California, USDA Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committees Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Lassen National Forest's Lassen County Resource Advisory Committee will meet Thursday, September 8, 2005 at the Lassen National Forest Supervisors Office, 2550 Riverside Drive, Susanville, California for a                               ( print page 51009)                            business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The business meeting on September 8 will begin at 9 a.m. The Committee will review and approve May meeting minutes and current agenda, have an overview of BLM Proposal on the Bizz Johnson Trail, Special Weed Action Team (SWAT) Proposal Update/Accomplishments, review monthly Monitoring Reports and discuss the development of an Annual Monitoring Report, Committee appointments, reappointments and elect a chair, announce the new grant cycle rollout & season meeting schedule. Time will also be set aside for public comments at the beginning and end of the meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Designated Federal Official Robert Andrews at (530) 257-4188; or Public Affairs Officer, Heidi Perry, at (530) 252-6604.

Laurie Tippin,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 05-17062 Filed 8-26-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00637-CV

Samantha SALINAS,

Appellant

v.

Kathryn Gene TORRES, Morris Stanley McManigal, III & Dana Cheryle Mule,

Appellees

From the County Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2022-0076

Honorable Wade J. Hedtke, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ, AND JUSTICE 

VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (allowing 

appellate courts to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when an appellant fails to timely file 

a brief); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing appellate courts to dismiss an appeal when an 

appellant fails to comply with a court order). It is ORDERED that no costs are assessed against 

appellant because she is entitled to proceed without costs. TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

Appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal is DENIED AS MOOT.

SIGNED February 1, 2023.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Chant Engineering Co., Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63366

)

Under Contract No. SPMYM2

- 21

- C

- 0003 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Marc Lamer, Esq.

Kostos and Lamer, P.C.

Philadelphia, PA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA Chief Trial Attorney

John J. Pritchard, Esq.

Tyson McDonald, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

DLA Land and Maritime

Columbus, OH

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Appellant’s unopposed motion to withdraw the appeal without prejudice, filed

prior to the government filing an answer, is granted.

Dated: October 5 , 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63366

, Appeal of Chant Engineering

Co., Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 5, 2022 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
II 

Calendar No. 1006 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3226 

To rename the Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site in the 

State of Kentucky as the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historical Park’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 7, 2008 

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, with an amendment 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To rename the Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site in the State of Kentucky as the ‘‘Abraham 

Lincoln Birthplace National Historical Park’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln 

5 Birthplace National Historical Park Act of 2008’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 3226 RS

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds that— 

3 (1) the Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National 

4 Historic Site was established by Congress on July 

5 17, 1916; 

6 (2) section 510 of Public Law 105–355 (16 

7 U.S.C. 218a) authorized the addition to the Historic 

8 Site of the 228-acre Knob Creek Farm at which 

9 Abraham Lincoln lived between 1811 and 1816; 

10 (3) Knob Creek Farm was donated to the Na11 tional Historic Site in November 2001; and 

12 (4) the 2006 General Management Plan for the 

13 Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site 

14 recommends a change in the name of the Historic 

15 Site to ‘‘National Historical Park’’ to reflect the ad16 dition of a second, noncontiguous unit. 

17 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN BIRTHPLACE 

18 NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 

19 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN BIRTHPLACE 

20 NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK. 

21 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Abraham Lincoln Birth22 place National Historic Site in the State of Kentucky shall 

23 be known and designated as the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln Birth24 place National Historical Park’’. 

25 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg26 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•S 3226 RS

1 States to the Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National His2 toric Site shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Abra3 ham Lincoln Birthplace National Historical Park’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Calendar No. 1006 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3226 

A BILL 

To rename the Abraham Lincoln Birthplace Natorical Park’’. the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National His- tional Historic Site in the State of Kentucky as 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 

Reported with an amendment 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
# The Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) (No. 2) Order 2013

        - Previous
        - Next

E+W+S

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 2112

Clean Air, England

# The Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) (No. 2) Order 2013

Made

27th August 2013

Laid before Parliament

2nd September 2013

Coming into force

1st October 2013

The Secretary of State makes the following Order in exercise of the powers conferred by section 21 of the Clean Air Act 1993(1).                        

The Secretary of State is satisfied that the fireplaces exempted by this Order can be used for burning fuel other than authorised                           fuels(2) without producing any smoke or a substantial quantity of smoke.                        

## Citation, application and commencementE+W+S

1.  This Order—                  

(a)may be cited as the Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) (No. 2) Order 2013;                  

(b)applies in England; and                  

(c)comes into force on 1st October 2013.                  

## Fireplaces exempted from the provisions of section 20 of the Clean Air Act 1993E+W+S

2.  The fireplaces listed in the Schedule are exempt from the provisions of section 20 of the Clean Air Act 1993 (prohibition                     on emission of smoke in smoke control area), subject to the conditions listed in the Schedule.                  

## RevocationE+W+S

3.  The Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) Order 2013(3) is revoked.                  

de Mauley

Parliamentary Under Secretary of State

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

27th August 2013

Article 2

## SCHEDULEE+W+SExempted Fireplaces

## EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Order)

This Order revokes and replaces with amendments the Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (England) Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/462).                  

It exempts the fireplaces listed in the Schedule from the provisions of section 20 of the Clean Air Act 1993 (prohibition                     of smoke emissions in smoke control areas), subject to the conditions set out in the Schedule. Several additional fireplaces                     have been exempted.                  

A full impact assessment has not been produced as no impact on the private, voluntary or public sectors is foreseen.

1

1993 c. 11.                           

2

Fuels declared by the Secretary of State to be authorised fuels for the purposes of Part 3 of the Clean Air Act 1993 under                              section 20(6) of that Act are specified in S.I. 2013/2111.                           

3

S.I. 2013/462.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6948

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID LEWIS OUTLAW,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District

Judge. (CR-95-3)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 21, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Lewis Outlaw, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Glen Reel, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Outlaw, No. CR-95-3 (E.D. Va. June

18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED