alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service 

# AGENCY:

Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability. 

# SUMMARY:

We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Biological Resources Discipline of the U.S. Geological Survey, have issued our combined Calendar Years 1999 and 2000 annual report on marine mammals under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of the Interior, as required by section 103(f) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. Our report covers the periods of January 1 to December 31, 1999, and January 1 to December 31, 2000. We submitted the report to Congress on September 7, 2004. By this notice, we are informing you, the public, that the report is available and that copies may be obtained on request to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

# ADDRESSES:

You should submit written requests for copies to: Publications Unit, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Conservation Training Center, Route 1, Box 166, Shepherd Grade Road, Shepherdstown, WV 25443. You may also contact that office by telephone at 1-800-344-WILD (9453). 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diane Bowen, Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Arlington, Virginia, at telephone 703-358-2161. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The U.S. Department of the Interior is responsible for eight species of marine mammals, as assigned by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361*et seq.*). These species are polar bear, sea and marine otters, walrus, three species of manatee, and dugong. Administrative actions discussed in our report include appropriations, status reports, research activities, scientific research and public display permits, international activities, law enforcement actions, and outer continental shelf operations and environmental studies.                 

Dated: July 25, 2005. 

Mamie Parker, 

Assistant Director, Fisheries and Habitat Conservation. 

[FR Doc. 05-17330 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-55-U
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of American Access Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005, I, Joseph F. McGuire, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005,fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Access Technologies, Inc.

Date: March 31, 2006



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph F. McGuire                                             
|Joseph F. McGuire Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Eline Entertainment Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal period ending October 31, 2002 as
filed wthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Barry A. Rothman, principal executive and principal accounting of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Barry A. Rothman
                                        Barry A. Rothman
                                        President and Principal Accounting
                                        and Financial Officer
February 13, 2003
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3390 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to provide for the 

treatment of institutions of higher education as voter registration agencies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2008 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to 

provide for the treatment of institutions of higher education as voter registration agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Voter Oppor5 tunity To Encourage Registration Act of 2008’’ or the 

6 ‘‘Student VOTER Act of 2008’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3390 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF UNIVERSITIES AS VOTER REG2 ISTRATION AGENCIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(a) of the National Voter 

4 Registration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg–5(a)) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub8 paragraph (A); 

9 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

10 subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

12 subparagraph: 

13 ‘‘(C) each institution of higher education 

14 (as defined in section 101 of the Higher Edu15 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) in the 

16 State that receives Federal funds.’’; and 

17 (2) in paragraph (6)(A), by inserting ‘‘or, in 

18 the case of an institution of higher education, with 

19 each registration of a student for enrollment in a 

20 course of study’’ after ‘‘assistance,’’. 

21 (b) AMENDMENT TO HIGHER EDUCATION ACT OF

22 1965.—Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 

23 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by striking para24 graph (23). 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
FILED

March 25, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

DIANA JEAN WHARTON ) RHEA COUNTY

 ) 03A01-9707-CH-00267

Plaintiff-Appellant )

)

 )

v . ) HON. BUDDY D. PERRY, 

) JUDGE

)

 )

WALTER H. WHARTON, JR., )

)

Defendant-Appellee ) AFFIRMED AND REMANDED

J. ANDREW STINNETT OF CHATTANOOGA FOR APPELLANT

L. THOMAS AUSTIN OF DUNLAP FOR APPELLEE

 O P I N I O N

 Goddard, P.J. 

Diana Jean Wharton appeals a divorce decree of the

Circuit Court for Rhea County, wherein the Trial Judge declared

that both parties were entitled to a divorce pursuant to T.C.A.

36-4-129. He thereupon divided the marital property, ordered Mr.

Wharton to pay rehabilitative alimony of $50 per week for a

period of nine months, granted Mrs. Wharton one-half interest in

the value of Mr. Wharton's Sprinkler Industries Supplementary
2

Retirement Plan, refused to award her any interest in the

National Automatic Sprinkler Industry pension fund. He also

found that the parties should retain the personal property then

in their possession, but declined to onerate Mr. Wharton with any

future medical bills incurred by the Plaintiff:

1 . Whether the Trial Court erred in properly

assessing the value of the real property and therefore

failed to divide the property equitably between the

parties.

2 . Whether the Trial Court erred in the division of

the marital estate when it failed to divide the

Appellee's pension funds between the parties.

3 . Whether the Trial Court erred in failing to

properly consider the Appellant's medical condition in

refusing to require the Appellee to continue paying

medical insurance for the Appellant.

4 . Whether the Trial Court erred in properly

considering all factors when awarding alimony to the

Appellant.

The testimony before the Trial Court is presented in

the record by a statement of the evidence, which we suspect is

woefully inadequate. (See Appendix.) For example, it does not

contain facts specifically found by the Trial Judge, i.e, the

amount of encumbrance as to the real estate or the value of the

pension fund he divided. It also omits the income that either

party is presently earning. 

However, upon indulging the assumption that the

statement of the evidence is accurate and complete, we are

nevertheless constrained to find that the evidence does not
3

preponderate against the Trial Judge's findings of fact, his

disposition of the parties' property, and the other determinations complained of by Mrs. Wharton.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the Trial

Court is affirmed and the cause remanded for such other

proceedings as may be necessary and collection of costs below. 

Costs of appeal are adjudged against Mrs. Wharton and her surety.

_______________________________

Houston M. Goddard, P.J. 

CONCUR:

________________________________

Herschel P. Franks, J.

________________________________

Don T. McMurray, J.
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying periodic report of Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Andrew Batinovich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Andrew Batinovich                
|                        |  | Andrew Batinovich                    
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                        |  | Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002


IN CONNECTION WITH THE QUARTERLY REPORT OF ORPHAN MEDICAL, INC. (THE "COMPANY")
ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AS FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON THE DATE HEREOF (THE "REPORT"), I, TIMOTHY
G. MCGRATH, VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE COMPANY, CERTIFY,
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002, THAT:

         (1) THE REPORT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 (A)
         OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934; AND

         (2) THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL
         MATERIAL REPECTS, THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF
         THE COMPANY.


                                         /s/ Timothy G. McGrath
                                         -----------------------------
                                         TIMOTHY G. MCGRATH
                                         VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                         NOVEMBER 13, 2002
Exhibit 10.1

                             NINTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                         CLUBCORP STOCK INVESTMENT PLAN

     Amendment made effective July 21, 1998, by ClubCorp International, Inc.,
formerly Club Corporation International (the "Company").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              - - - - - - - - - -

     WHEREAS, the Company maintains the ClubCorp Stock Investment Plan (the
"Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company amended and restated the Plan effective January 1,
1995 and subsequently amended the Plan to make certain technical qualification
changes in response to a request from the Internal Revenue Service; and

     WHEREAS,  the Company subsequently amended the Plan on several occasions to
make other changes desired by the Company; and

     WHEREAS, effective July 21, 1998, the Company changed its name from Club
Corporation International to ClubCorp International, Inc.; and

     WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to change the name of
the Company, as defined therein, from Club Corporation International to ClubCorp
International, Inc., effective as of the date the Company changed its name; and

     WHEREAS, the Plan may be amended by the Company pursuant to the provisions
of Article XV of the Plan, and the Company desires to amend the Plan.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows, effective as set forth
above:

1.     Existing Section 2.09 is deleted in its entirety, and the following is
substituted in its place:

"2.09 "Company" means ClubCorp International, Inc. or its successor."


                         CLUBCORP INTERNATIONAL, INC.


Date:  September 21, 1998               By:  /s/Kim S. Besse
       ------------------                    ---------------
TREOFAN AMERICA, LLC v. EXCELSIOR PACKAGING GROUP, INC.

No. COA05-735

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Forsyth (04CVS1142).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
SMITH v. STARNES.

No. COA07-507.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Union (92SP92).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G. LaPerch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 28, 2011
By:
/s/ William G. LaPerchWilliam G. LaPerch

Chief Executive Officer
### NUMBER 13 - 13 - 00264 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ADOLFO VELA D/B/A ADELCO ENTERPRISES , A ppellant ,

v. CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. , A ppellees

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Adolfo Vela d/b/a Adelco Enterprises, attempted to appeal an order granting summary judgment rendered on April 17, 2013. One of the appellees, Catl in Specialty Insurance Company (“Catlin”), has requested this Court to examine its jurisdiction over the appeal. According to Catlin, the summary judgment was not a final judgment because it failed to dispose of all claims, specifically, its own claims fo r2

attorney’s fees. Catlin supported its position with a transcript from a trial court hearing in which the trial court explicitly stated that the summary judgment order was not intended to be a final judgment and that claims remain pending in the case. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appear s that the order from which this appeal was taken w as not a final , appealable order. An appeal generally may be taken only from a final judgment. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp ., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). With certain exceptions that are not applicable to this case , a judgment is final for purposes of appeal if it disposes of all pending parties and claims in the record.
Id. We determine whether a judgment is final by c onsidering the judgment's language
and the record in the case. Id. When, as here, there has not been a conventional trial on the merits, an order or judgment is not final for purposes of appeal "unless it actually disposes of every pending claim and part y or unless it clearly and unequivocally states that it finally disposes of all claims and parties." Id. at 205. In such a case, the inclusion of a “ Mother Hubbard clause, ” i.e ., one reciting that "all relief not granted is denied," does
not indicate tha t a judgment rendered without a conventional trial on the merits is final.
Id. at 203

– 04. An order does not dispose of all claims and all parties merely because it is entitled "final" or because the word "final" appears elsewhere in the order. Id . at 20 5. The Court, having considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, t he appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 11th day of July , 2013

.
CHERNEY v. NC ZOOLOGICAL PARK.

No. 606A04-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 4, 2007.

Joe Thomas Knott, Bruce W. Berger, Kenneth R. Murphy, III, Raleigh, for Cherney.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of October 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> *894"Motion Allowed. Defendant (N.C. Zoological Park) shall have up to and including the 30th day of November 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of October 2007."

TIMMONS-GOODSON, J., recused.
<PAGE>

      EXHIBIT 15.2 -- LETTER RE: UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION



Board of Directors
Price Enterprises, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-60999) pertaining to the Price Enterprises 1995 Combined
Stock Grant and Stock Option Plan and the Price Enterprises Directors' 1995
Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 9, 1996 relating to the
unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Price Enterprises,
Inc. which are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 24,
1995.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a
part of a registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within
the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.



ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Diego, California
January 9, 1996
**Exhibit32.2**

**Certification by the VicePresident - Finance**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PAULA Financial (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-QSB”), I, Deborah S.Maddocks, Vice President Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Form 10-QSB fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-QSBfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| VICE PRESIDENT - FINANCE                  |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
| /s/ Deborah S. Maddocks                   |   |   |   |
| Deborah S. Maddocks                       |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
| Date:   September 21, 2006 |   |   |
|                                           |        |        |  |

 

1

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5802 

To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation 

Act of 1996 to repeal the denial of food stamp eligibility of ex-offenders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2008 

Ms. LEE (for herself, Mr. ELLISON, and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 

Reconciliation Act of 1996 to repeal the denial of food 

stamp eligibility of ex-offenders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food Assistance to 

5 Improve Reintegration Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DENIAL OF BENEFITS. 

7 Section 115 of the Personal Responsibility and Work 

8 Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (21 U.S.C. 862a) 

9 is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a) by striking paragraph (2); 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 5802 IH

1 (2) in subsection (b) by striking paragraph (2); 

2 and 

3 (3) in subsection (e) by striking paragraph (2). 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BERNARD WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 28 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of June, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.