alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# The Plant Health (England) (Amendment) (No.2) Order 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

E+W+S

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 1477

Plant Health, England

# The Plant Health (England) (Amendment) (No.2) Order 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

13th June 2013

Laid before Parliament

19th June 2013

Coming into force

15th July 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Order revoked (1.7.2015) by The Plant Health (England) Order 2015 (S.I. 2015/610), art. 1(b), **Sch. 18**

## F1EXPLANATORY NOTE                  

(This note is not part of the Order)

This Order amends the Plant Health (England) Order 2005 (S.I. 2005/2530) (“the principal Order”).                  

Articles 6, 7 and 9 to 12 amend article 22 of, and Schedules 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 to, the principal Order. The amendments implement                     the specific control measures in the Commission Implementing Decisions referred to in article 3(1)(a) and Commission Implementing                     Decision 2013/67/EU amending Decision 2004/416/EC on temporary emergency measures in respect of certain citrus fruits originating in Brazil (OJ No L 31, 31.1.2013, p. 75).                  

Articles 3(1)(c), 4 and 5 amend the definition of “protected zone” in article 2(1), and make minor amendments to articles                     6(2) and 12(2), of the principal Order to take account of Commission Regulation (EC) No 690/2008 recognising protected zones exposed to particular plant health risks in the Community (OJ No L 193, 22.7.2008, p. 1).                  

Article 8 amends Schedule 3 to the principal Order to implement Commission Implementing Decision 2012/219/EU recognising Serbia                     as being free from *Clavibachter michiganensis* ssp. *Sepedonicus* (Spieckerman and Kotthof) Davis *et al*. (OJ No L 114, 26.4.2012, p. 28).                  

Article 3(1)(a) and (d) provides for the references to Commission Implementing Decision 2012/756/EU, Commission Implementing                     Decision 2012/697/EU, Commission Implementing Decision 2012/270/EU, Commission Implementing Decision 2012/138/EU and Commission Regulation (EC) No 690/2008 in the principal Order to be read as references to those instruments as amended from time to time.                  

An impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no impact on business or the private or voluntary sector                     is foreseen. The Explanatory Memorandum for this instrument is available alongside the instrument at www.legislation.gov.uk.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3246 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the Secretary of 

the Treasury to set the standard mileage rate for use of a passenger 

automobile for purposes of the charitable contributions deduction. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10 (legislative day, JULY 9), 2008 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

Secretary of the Treasury to set the standard mileage 

rate for use of a passenger automobile for purposes 

of the charitable contributions deduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Deal for Volun5 teers Act of 2008’’. 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3246 IS

1 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF STANDARD MILEAGE RATE 

2 FOR CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS DEDUC3 TION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (i) of section 170 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to standard 

6 mileage rate for use of passenger automobile) is amended 

7 to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(i) STANDARD MILEAGE RATE FOR USE OF PAS9 SENGER AUTOMOBILE.—For purposes of computing the 

10 deduction under this section for use of a passenger auto11 mobile, the standard mileage rate shall be the rate deter12 mined by the Secretary.’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 this section shall apply to miles traveled after the date 

15 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
HEALY v. UNION COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

No. COA07-526

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 19, 2008.

Certification Date March 10, 2008.

Appeal from Union (06CVS2024).

Decision without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
STATE v. FOXX

No. COA06-437

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Chatham (05CRS51327, 05CRS51328).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                          EPIC DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                  DECEMBER 31,
                                                                              --------------------
                                                                               1996         1995
                                                                              -------      -------


<S>                                                                           <C>          <C>
Net income                                                                    $ 2,926      $ 1,867
                                                                              =======      =======




Weighted average common shares outstanding                                     13,667       12,282
Weighted average convertible preferred stock
Weighted average common share equivalents related to stock options
(using the treasury stock method)                                               1,068        1,374
                                                                              -------      -------


Shares used in per share computation                                           14,735       13,656
                                                                              =======     ========


Net income per share                                                          $  0.20      $  0.14
                                                                              =======      =======
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Craig J. Alexander, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 431]

Cardona, P.J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered April 29, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

Following a shooting death in the City of Binghamton, Broome County, defendant was charged with murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the first degree in full satisfaction of the indictment in exchange for a sentence of 11 years in prison. Defendant was thereafter sentenced to 11 years in prison, to be followed by a five-year period of postrelease supervision, and he now appeals.

*1224Defendant’s contention that the plea was not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered because County Court failed to advise him during the plea proceedings that he would be subject to a period of postrelease supervision is unpreserved for our review *(see People v Van Gorden,*307 AD2d 547, 548 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 581 [2003]; *see also People v Haynes,*14 AD3d 789, 791 [2005], *lv denied*4 NY3d 831 [2005]). The record reveals that defendant was advised prior to sentencing that his negotiated sentence would include a five-year period of postrelease supervision. Defendant did not dispute this statement and he thereafter failed to move to either withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction on that basis *(see People v Van Gorden, supra*at 548). In view of these facts, we decline to take corrective action as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(compare People v Jachimowicz,*292 AD2d 688, 688 [2002]), and we are unpersuaded by defendant’s assertion that *People v Catu*(4 NY3d 242 [2005]) requires a different result. Finally, we discern no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances that would warrant a reduction in the sentence *(see People v Dedmon,*10 AD3d 738, 739 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 756 [2004]; *People v Hanrahan,*9 AD3d 689, 689 [2004]).

Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
IN RE J.M.B.

No. COA07-275.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from Iredell (06JA101, 06JA102, 06JA103, 06JA104).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed and remanded.
STATE v. MELVIN.

No. COA07-908.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 5, 2008.

Certification Date February 25, 2008.

Appeal from Scotland (06CRS51314).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. GARNER.

No. COA07-219.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 16, 2007.

Certification Date November 5, 2007.

Appeal from Alamance (05CRS56861, 05CRS56862, 05CRS56863, 05CRS19661).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Council Decision of 24 February 2014 appointing a member of the Court of Auditors (2014/111/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 24 February 2014

# appointing a member of the Court of Auditors

# (2014/111/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(2) thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(1),                        

Whereas:

(1)The term of office of Mr Harald NOACK expires on 28 February 2014.

(2)A new appointment should therefore be made,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Klaus-Heiner LEHNE is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 March 2014 to 29 February                     2020.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 February 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

K. Arvanitopoulos                            

1

Opinion of 4 February 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
# Commission Decision of 13 June 2014 amending Decision 2007/742/EC on electrically driven, gas driven or gas absorption heat            pumps (notified under document C(2014) 3838) (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/363/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Decision

# of 13 June 2014

# amending Decision 2007/742/EC on electrically driven, gas driven or gas absorption heat pumps

# *(notified under document C(2014) 3838)*

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2014/363/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the EU Ecolabel(1), and in particular point (c) of Article 8(3) thereof,                        

After consulting the European Union Eco-Labelling Board,

Whereas:

(1)Air/brine/water-to-water heat pumps that provide heat to a water-based central heating system are in scope of Commission Decision                              2014/314/EU of 28 May 2014 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel for water-based heaters(2).

(2)Commission Decision 2007/742/EC of 9 November 2007 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label                              to electrically driven, gas driven or gas absorption heat pumps(3) expires on 31 October 2014.

(3)An assessment has been carried out to evaluate the relevance and appropriateness of the current ecological criteria, as well                              as of the related assessment and verification requirements, established by this Decision. Given the different stages of the                              revision process for this Decision, it is appropriate to prolong the period of validity of the ecological criteria and the                              related assessment and verification requirements which it sets out. The period of validity of the ecological criteria and                              the related assessment and verification requirements set out in Decision 2007/742/EC should be prolonged until 31 December                              2016.

(4)The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up by Article 16 of Regulation                              (EC) No 66/2010.

(5)Decision 2007/742/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Decision 2007/742/EC is amended as follows:

In the third paragraph of Article 1, the following point (c) is added:

heat pumps which provide heat to a water based central heating system’                                    

In Article 4, ‘31 October 2014’ is replaced by ‘31 December 2016’

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 June 2014.

*For the Commission*                            

Janez Potočnik                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

1

OJ L 27, 30.1.2010, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 164, 3.6.2014, p. 83.                           

3

OJ L 301, 20.11.2007, p. 14.
Exhibit 4.15      CONSENT OF FRANCIS CHARTRAND   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2013 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Francis Chartrand, participated in the preparation of the following technical reports:  - Technical Report and Recommendations, Summer 2012 Exploration Program, Anatacau Property, Quebec completed in March 2013; and  - Technical Report and Recommendations, Summer 2012 Exploration Program  Wabamisk Project completed in January 2013;  concerning mineralized material in the Anatacau and Wabamisk properties for the Company (collectively the Reports). Portions of the Reports are summarized, for both properties, under headings Item III  Description of the Business  3.2.4 Geological Setting; 3.2.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.2.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2013 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,     /S/ Francis ChartrandName:
Francis Chartrand, Ph.D. P.Geo.   May 13, 2013
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3423 

To provide for equity in the award of military decorations and citations 

for service in the Armed Forces since March 20, 2003, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2008 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for equity in the award of military decorations 

and citations for service in the Armed Forces since 

March 20, 2003, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EQUITY IN THE AWARD OF MILITARY DECORA4 TIONS AND CITATIONS FOR SERVICE IN THE 

5 ARMED FORCES SINCE MARCH 20, 2003. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

7 take appropriate actions to ensure that each member and 

8 unit of the Armed Forces (including members and units 

9 of the National Guard and Reserve) that has served in 

10 the Armed Forces since March 20, 2003, is awarded each 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3423 IS

1 decoration, medal, citation, commendation, or other mili2 tary award to which such member or unit is entitled by 

3 reason of service in the Armed Forces since that date. 

4 (b) AUDIT OF AWARDS.—In furtherance of meeting 

5 the requirement in subsection (a), the Secretary shall pro6 vide for a comprehensive audit of the decorations, medals, 

7 citations, commendations, and other military awards 

8 awarded for service in the Armed Forces since March 20, 

9 2003, in order to determine whether any decorations, med10 als, citations, commendations, or other awards to be 

11 awarded as described in that subsection have yet to be 

12 awarded. 

13 (c) PROCEDURES FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW OF CER14 TAIN AWARDS.— 

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—Each Secretary of a military 

16 department shall establish procedures to provide for 

17 the expedited review by general officers or flag offi18 cers, as applicable, of recommendations for the 

19 award by such military department of decorations 

20 medals, badges, or other military awards for service 

21 in combat or under hostile fire that require the ap22 proval of a general or flag officer. 

23 (2) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of the 

24 Army and the Secretary of the Air Force shall each 

25 consult with the adjutants general of the States 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 3423 IS

1 under the jurisdiction of such Secretary in estab2 lishing procedures under paragraph (1). 

3 (d) REPORT ON PROGRESS IN AWARD.—Not later 

4 than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

5 the Secretary shall submit to Congress a reports on the 

6 progress made in the award of decorations, medals, cita7 tions, commendations, and other military awards as de8 scribed in that subsection. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000929547
<NAME> INKINE PHARMACEUTICAL
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             792
<SECURITIES>                                    13,248
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,293
<PP&E>                                             236
<DEPRECIATION>                                      31
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,648
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,778)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,778)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.58)
        

</TABLE>
In the Matter of JOHN MORRIS MINISTRIES, 308 N. DRIVER STREET, DURHAM, NC 27703 v. NORTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT et als, United States Supreme Court et als.

No. 260P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

John Morris, pro se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 4th day of June 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
STATE v. Joan Myrtle SHANNON.

No. 177A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 30, 2007.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Shannon.

W. Clark Everett, District Attorney, for Conference of District Attorneys.

Bradley J. Bannon, for NCATL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of August 2007 by NCATL for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of August 2007."
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSBA of American
Access Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004, I, Joseph F. McGuire, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, that:



| | 1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSBA for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSBA for the year ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of American Access Technologies, Inc.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August
12, 2005



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph F. McGuire                                             
|Joseph F. McGuire Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
STATE v. Richard N. GREGORY.

No. 113P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of March 2007 by Defendant to Alter or Amend the Judgment:

*393"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."