alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001043476
<NAME>                        OAO Technolgy Solutions, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              22,221
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                           289<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    44,642
<PP&E>                                               5,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                         848<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      50,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               11,393
<BONDS>                                                883<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               163
<OTHER-SE>                                          37,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        50,342
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    84,666
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       65,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    13,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4,780
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,912
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,868
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,868
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.27<F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.26<F4>
        
<FN>
<F1> See Note 6 In the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements, and Schedule
     II - Valuation and Quailifying Accounts.
<F2> See Note 7 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<F3> Represents the long-term portion of capital lease obligations. See Note 10
     in  the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<F4> See Note 4 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
</FN>

</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3350 

To provide that claims of the United States to certain documents relating 

to Franklin Delano Roosevelt shall be treated as waived and relinquished 

in certain circumstances. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2008 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide that claims of the United States to certain documents relating to Franklin Delano Roosevelt shall be 

treated as waived and relinquished in certain circumstances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN DOC4 UMENTS RELATING TO FRANKLIN DELANO 

5 ROOSEVELT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—If any person makes a gift of any 

7 property described in subsection (b) to the National Ar8 chives and Records Administration, then any claim of the 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3350 IS

1 United States to such property shall be treated as having 

2 been waived and relinquished on the day before the date 

3 of such gift. 

4 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—Property is described in 

5 this subsection if such property is a part of the collection 

6 of documents, papers, and memorabilia relating to Frank7 lin Delano Roosevelt, or any member of his family or staff, 

8 which was originally in the possession of Grace Tully and 

9 retained by her at the time of her death, and included 

10 in her estate. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                   Subsidiaries of Toymax International, Inc.

         The following list reflects the subsidiaries of Toymax International,
Inc. as of March 31, 1999.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                       Jurisdiction of            Ownership
Subsidiary                             Incorporation              Percentage
---------------                        -----------------        ---------------
<S>                                    <C>                           <C>

Toymax (H.K.) Limited                  Hong Kong                     100%

Toymax (U.K.) Limited                  United Kingdom                100%

Toymax Inc.                            New York                      100%

Toymax (Bermuda) Limited               Bermuda                       100%

Toymax (Canada) Limited                Canada                        100%

Craft Expressions, Inc.                New York                      100%

Go Fly A Kite, Inc.                    New York                      100%
</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Of Chief Executive Officer

I, Richard E. Aho, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Mile Marker
International, Inc. (the Registrant).

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and

(c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.     The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls;
and





---



##### 



6.     The Registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|             |  |                                                         
|------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: 8-8-03 |  |                                                         
|            
|             |  | /s/ Richard E. AhoRichard E. Aho
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Guidant Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Keith E. Brauer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), to the
best of my knowledge that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/    Keith
E. Brauer Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. HARDY.

No. COA06-64.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Pitt (04CRS56466, 04CRS56467, 04CRS56468).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 12.1




RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGE:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>




                                                          Three                Three               Nine             Nine
                                                       Months Ended         Months Ended        Months Ended     Months Ended
                                                       September 30,        September 30,      September 30,      September 30,
                                                           1997                 1998                1997              1998
                                                     ----------------     -------------       --------------    ---------------
<S>                                                       <C>                 <C>                 <C>               <C> 
Income before provision for                               $1,607               $4,390             $ 3,706           $2,477
income taxes
   Add fixed charges
Interest costs including amortization
of debt issuance cost                                        245                  723                 653            1,376
                                                          ------               ------             -------          -------
   Earnings                                               $1,852               $5,113             $ 4,359           $3,853

Fixed charges:
Interest expense including
amortization of debt issuance costs                          245                  723                 653            1,376
Capitalized interest                                       1,620                2,540               4,600            6,800
                                                          ------               ------             -------          -------
Total fixed charges                                       $1,865               $3,986              $5,253           $8,176
                                                          ------               ------             -------          -------
   Ratio  of earnings to fixed charges                         -                                        -             N/A
Excess (deficiency) of earnings to
cover fixed charges                                       $  (13)              $1,127              $ (894)         $(4,323)
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2







Jean-Francois Turgeon







EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION







Dear JF,







We refer to your Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), dated as of July 25, 2013, setting forth the terms pursuant to which you are an employee of Tronox LLC (the “Company”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement, you and the Company hereby mutually agree to extend the Term (within the meaning of the Employment Agreement) indefinitely by amending and restating Paragraph 2 of the Employment Agreement in its entirety as follows:







“2.          Term. The term of this Agreement (the “Term”) shall be for a period beginning on January 1, 2014 (the “Commencement Date”), and continuing indefinitely unless earlier terminated in accordance with this Agreement.”







Except as otherwise set forth herein, all other terms and conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement shall continue unless you and the Company shall mutually agree to amend the Employment Agreement pursuant to its terms.







Please confirm your acceptance of the extension of your Employment Agreement as set forth above by signing below.







Best regards,







	
/s/ Thomas J. Casey

	 
	
Tom Casey

	 
	
Chairman and CEO

	 








	
Agreed and Accepted:  

	/s/ Jean-Francois Turgeon	 
	 	
Jean-Francois Turgeon

	 
	 	
Executive Vice President

	 
	 	 	 
	
Dated: July 13, 2016
THOMPSON v. HENDRICKSON

No. COA06-1104

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Wake (02CVS10677).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
Dougras — Saitta 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. 

Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 

(2004). 

Petitioner acknowledges in the petition that no written order 

reflecting the district court's ruling has been entered. This court has held 

that the district court's oral pronouncement from the bench is ineffective 

for any purpose. Rust v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 

1380, 1382 (1987). Moreover, the district court noted at the July 2, 2013, 

hearing that the State of Illinois is the jurisdiction to resolve the issue of 

custody as to these children. Under these circumstances, we conclude that 

our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. See 

NRAP 21(b); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 

818 P.2d at 851 (stating that the issuance of an extraordinary writ is 

purely discretionary with this court). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

J. 

cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Special Public Defender 

Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

"In light of our decision in this matter, we deny petitioner's request 

for a stay as moot. 

2
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 48/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 48/2013 of 21 January 2013 amending the representative prices and additional import            duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 892/2012 for the 2012/13 marketing            year (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 48/2013                     

# of 21 January 2013

# amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Implementing                        Regulation (EU) No 892/2012 for the 2012/13 marketing year (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 75/2013 of 25 January 2013 derogating from Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 as regards                                 the application of representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector and repealing                                 Implementing Regulation (EU) No 892/2012 fixing the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products                                 in the sugar sector for the 2012/2013 marketing year.
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner v. Charles G. COUCH, Jr.; Joe C. Young, Trustee, U/A Dated December 24, 1992 With Wayne T. Upchurch and Elizabeth C. Upchurch, Known as the Barry Upchurch Trust; Joe C. Young, Trustee, U/A Dated December 24, 1992 With Wayne T. Upchurch and Elizabeth C. Upchurch, Known as the Graves Upchurch Trust, Respondents.

No. 412PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 9, 2007.

Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, by Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Raleigh, Mark P. Henriques, Charlotte and Sarah A. Motley, Raleigh, for petitioner-appellant.

James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A., by Bruce M. Simpson, Charlotte, for respondent-appellees.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 32(a)

          Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
                         18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John C. Hunter III, Chief Executive Officer of Solutia Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

    (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal
        year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.

Dated: March 15, 2004

                                             /s/  JOHN C. HUNTER III
                                         -------------------------------
                                               John C. Hunter III
                                             Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Solutia Inc. and will be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
LUDEMANN v. BRADFORD CLINIC, INC.

No. COA07-50.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (06CVS3887).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. HANTON.

No. COA07-313.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Cleveland (98CRS8537).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; no error in part.
# Women's Equality Day, 2005

On August 26, 1920, the 19th Amendment to the Constitution was adopted, guaranteeing American women the right to vote. The passage of this amendment was the culmination of a long struggle that reached back to the founding of the country and was furthered by the 1848 women's rights convention in Seneca Falls, New York. By celebrating Women's Equality Day, we commemorate the adoption of this amendment and honor the visionary women who fought tirelessly for women's suffrage.

Led by women such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and Lucretia Mott, the suffragists stood up against injustice and persevered until, as Susan B. Anthony wrote, the handful who first took a stand for suffrage grew into an army. The efforts of these pioneers helped secure for American women the right to vote.

Since the adoption of the 19th Amendment, women have continued to make great contributions to our Nation. Women today are leaders in medicine, law, journalism, business, government, and other professions. They are doctors and mothers, teachers and lawyers, homemakers and pilots, artists and entrepreneurs. Women also are serving with great honor in our Armed Forces as we fight a war on terror and defend our freedoms. The hard work of American women is essential to the strength and vitality of our country.

One hundred and fifty-seven years after the Seneca Falls Convention, we continue to work so that all people can enjoy their God-given rights. This Women's Equality Day, as we celebrate the 85th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, we honor the perseverance, leadership, and achievements of the suffragists and all of America's women, and we renew our commitment to equal justice and dignity for all.

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim August 26, 2005, as Women's Equality Day. I call upon the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate programs and activities.                              ( print page 51558)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fifth day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth.

[FR Doc. 05-17389

Billing code 3195-01-P