alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3467 

To extend through April 1, 2009, the MinnesotaCare Medicaid demonstration 

project. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend through April 1, 2009, the MinnesotaCare 

Medicaid demonstration project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MINNESOTACARE MEDICAID 

4 DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec6 retary of Health and Human Services shall extend, effec7 tive July 1, 2008, and through April 1, 2009, the approval 

8 of waivers under section 1115 of the Social Security Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1315) for Medicaid demonstration project No. 

10 11–W–00039/5 (entitled Prepaid Medical Assistance ProjVerDate Aug 31 2005 01:04 Sep 11, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3467.IS S3467

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3467 IS

1 ect Plus (PMAP+)), providing for operation of the Minne2 sotaCare program as well as providing authority for other 

3 flexibilities within the Medicaid program that support 

4 Minnesota’s healthcare infrastructure. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21.01
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        STATE OF
SUBSIDIARY                           INCORPORATION                      D/B/A
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>                                <C> 
The Roy Houff Company                   Illinois                        
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CFX, Inc.                               Florida
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bay State Florist Supply, Inc.          Massachusetts
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flower Trading Corporation              Florida
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United Wholesale Florists, Inc.         Arkansas
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United Wholesale Florists of
America, Inc.                           Arkansas                
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Florist Supply, Inc.           Massachusetts                   Johnson's Roses
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monterey Bay Bouquet, Inc.              California              
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alpine Gem Flower Shippers, Inc.        Montana
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continental Farms Limited               Florida 
(limited partnership)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic Bouquet Company Limited        Florida 
(limited partnership)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XL Group, Inc.                          Florida
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Koehler & Dramm, Inc.                   Delaware
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everflora, Inc.                         New Jersey
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everflora Miami, Inc.                   Florida
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UltraFlora Corporation, Inc.            Florida
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
H&H Flowers, Inc.                       Florida                         La Fleurette
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>
# Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument            (2014/94/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council

# of 20 November 2013

# on the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument

# (2014/94/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission                           on budgetary discipline and sound financial management(1), and in particular point 27 thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas, after having examined all possibilities for re-allocating appropriations under heading 1b, it appears necessary to                           mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to complement the financing in the general budget of the European Union for the financial                           year 2013, beyond the ceiling of heading 1b, of EUR 134 049 037 towards the financing of the European Social Fund to increase                           the allocations to France, Italy and Spain for the year 2013 by a total amount of EUR 150 000 000,                        

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2013, the Flexibility Instrument shall be used to provide                     the sum of EUR 134 049 037 in commitment appropriations in heading 1b.                  

That amount shall be used to complement the financing of the European Social Fund under heading 1b.

# Article 2U.K.

This decision shall be published in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Strasbourg, 20 November 2013.

*For the European Parliament*                            

*The President*                            

M. Schulz                            

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

V. Leškevičius                            

1

OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1835. JOHN C. GRAHAM v. STEPHANIE A. CURTIS.

On March 29, 2017, the trial court entered a consent stalking twelve-month

protective order against John C. Graham. On May 1, 2017, Graham filed a pro se

notice of appeal from this order. We lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the trial court’s

order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an

absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon thisCourt. See Perlman v. Perlman,

318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012).

Here, Graham filed his notice of appeal 33 days after the entry of the trial

court’s order underlying his appeal. Accordingly,we lack jurisdiction to consider this

appeal, which is therefore DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

June 15, 2017

06/15/2017
STATE v. Marion Preston GILLESPIE.

No. 2PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 4, 2007.

James R. Glover, Chapel Hill, for Gillespie.

William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st day of May 2007 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 11th day of June 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of June 2007."
STATE v. STRYKER.

No. COA07-590.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS24739, 05CRS94498).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
SMITH v. BENNETT.

No. COA07-124.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (05CVS17455).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: 5622 EQUITY DE, LLC and

REAL PROPERTY located at 5622 EVERS

ROAD, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, 78238,

 Appellants,

v.

CITY OF LEON VALLEY,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00030-CV

Appeal from the

285th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2022-CI-4895)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the joint motion to dismiss the appeal, which

indicates the parties have settled their dispute in the underlying litigation, and concludes the motion 

should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We further 

order Court costs are taxed against Appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. (the Registrant) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the
General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | August 12, 2009        



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | August 12, 2009
# Commission Implementing Decision of 6 November 2014 concerning certain interim protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic            avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in Germany (notified under document C(2014) 8390) (Only the German text is authentic) (Text            with EEA relevance) (2014/778/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 6 November 2014

# concerning certain interim protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in Germany

# *(notified under document C(2014) 8390)*

# (Only the German text is authentic)

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2014/778/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by 2014/864/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 28 November 2014 concerning certain protective measures in relation to highly                                 pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in Germany (notified under document C(2014) 9112) Text with EEA relevance.
STATE of North Carolina v. Martinie Seeta LAKEY.

No. 130P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, for Lakey.

Elizabeth Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th day of March 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."
EXHIBIT 10.44


logo

Solutia Inc.

575 Maryville Centre Drive

St. Louis, Missouri 63141 U.S.A

Tel: +1.314.674.1000

www.solutia.com


February 14, 2012
 
 
 Mr. Paul J. Berra III
 12513 Arbour Knoll Place
 St. Louis, Missouri 63128
 
 Re:  Amendment to the Letter Severance Agreement
 
 Dear Paul:
 
 You previously entered into an agreement with Solutia, Inc. (the “Company”) on February 25, 2009 (the “Agreement”) describing a modification to the severance benefits under the Executive Separation Pay Plan (the “Plan”) provided that your employment was terminated either involuntarily or as a result of a Change in Control as those terms are defined within the Plan.  The Company would like to amend the Agreement to clarify your severance benefits by deleting in its entirety the paragraph under the section titled “Termination as a result of a Change In Control” and replacing it with the following:
 
 In the event of an involuntary termination within twelve months of a Change in Control, you will receive a lump sum payment (less required withholding) equal to 200% of your annual base salary on the date of termination, plus 200% of the average annual bonus paid to you for the 2010 and 2011 calendar years.
 
 If the provisions of this amendment are acceptable to you, please sign one copy of this amendment in the space provided at the end of this letter and return the same to Jeffry N. Quinn.
 
 
 ACCEPTED AND AGREED this __ day of February 2012
   Solutia Inc.Paul J. Berra III
Name:
Jeffry N. QuinnTitle:
Chairman, President and ChiefExecutive officer
IN RE A.W.T.

No. COA07-926.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 18, 2007.

Certification Date January 7, 2008.

Appeal from Catawba (05JT48, 05JT49).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D., hereby certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D.        
|                       |  |  |  | Vicente Anido, Jr., Ph.D.            
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         403,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,172,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     229,827,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (18,679,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             221,086,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     56,155,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       162,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 142,962,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               221,086,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,769,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,518,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             840,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,411,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,411,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,411,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,411,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth KING.

No. 613P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for King.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 4th day of December 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                           Of Chief Financial Officer


I, Alvin A. Hirsch,  the Chief Financial  Officer of Mile Marker  International,
Inc. (the  "Company"),  have executed this  certification in connection with the
filing with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Company's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10- QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th
day of May, 2006.


/s/ Alvin A. Hirsch
-----------------------
    Alvin A. Hirsch
Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. TAYLOR

No. COA06-1246

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Northampton (04CRS51156).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit



	
		
	
	Exhibit 10.4









NON QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT
	
		
	Name of Optionee:


	




	Grant Date:


	 

	Number of Option Shares:


	 

	Option Price per Share:


	 






This Agreement evidences the grant by Compass Minerals International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), of a non-qualified stock option to the above-referenced “Optionee”, and  the acceptance of the non-qualified stock option by the Optionee, pursuant to the Compass Minerals International, Inc. 2015 Incentive Award Plan, as may be amended from time to time (the “Plan”), and the Rules, Policies and Procedures adopted by the Committee for the Plan, as may be amended from time to time.  The Plan and the Rules, Policies and Procedures are collectively referred to in this Agreement as the “Governing Documents”.  
1.      Incorporation of Governing Documents.  The terms and provisions of the Governing Documents are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement by reference.  In the event of a conflict between any provision of this Agreement and the Governing Documents, the provisions of the Governing Documents will control.  Capitalized terms used in this Agreement and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to those terms in the Governing Documents.
2.      Option Price.  Subject to terms and conditions of the Governing Documents and this Agreement, Optionee shall have the option (the “Option”) to purchase shares of Stock at the price per share (the “Option Price”) and in the amounts set forth above.  Payment of the Option Price may be made in any manner specified under the Governing Documents.  The Option is not intended to qualify for federal income tax purposes as an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.  
3.      Term.  The term of the Option shall commence on the Grant Date and expire upon the earlier of:  the seventh (7th) anniversary of the Grant Date, or the time set forth in the Governing Documents.
4.      Vesting and Exercise of Option.  The Option will become vested and exercisable at the  Option Price and with respect to the Number of Option Shares set forth above, in accordance with the following vesting schedule: 
	
		
	Date
	Vested %

	1st anniversary of Grant Date
	25%

	2nd anniversary of Grant Date
	50%

	3rd anniversary of Grant Date
	75%

	4th anniversary of Grant Date
	100%






5.      Entire Agreement.  This Agreement, together with the Governing Documents, constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersede all prior written or oral negotiations, commitments, representations and agreements with respect thereto.
6.      Receipt of Governing Documents.  Optionee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Governing Documents.


1





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Grant Date.  This Agreement may be executed in counterparts.
COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.	
		
	By:
	 

	Name:
	Steven N. Berger

	Title:
	Senior Vice President Corporate Services




OPTIONEE
	
	
	 














2
HUGUELY v. MRAZ.

No. COA07-295.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Currituck (03CVS161).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.