alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3550 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3550

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
To designate a portion of the Rappahannock River in the Commonwealth of 
               Virginia as the ``John W. Warner Rapids''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOHN W. WARNER RAPIDS, FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA.
    (a) Designation.--The portion of the Rappahannock River comprised 
of the manmade rapids located at the site of the former Embrey Dam in 
Fredericksburg, Virginia, and centered at the coordinates of N. 38.3225 
latitude, W. 077.4900 longitude, shall be known and designated as the 
``John W. Warner Rapids''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the portion of the 
Rappahannock River referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 
a reference to the John W. Warner Rapids.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
SPECTRA CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL
3, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                                 18,094
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          38,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                            2,240
<INVENTORY>                                            31,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      101,467
<PP&E>                                                 31,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                         14,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        242,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 100,976
<BONDS>                                                 7,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  153
<OTHER-SE>                                            129,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          242,923
<SALES>                                                41,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       41,874
<CGS>                                                  25,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          25,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        4,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          (3)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             8
<INCOME-TAX>                                                4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         4
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                4
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.9


 


Execution Version


 


THIS NOTE IS SUBJECT TO THE SUBORDINATION
AND INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENT, DATED AS OF JULY 20, 2016, AMONG THE MAKER OF THIS NOTE, ALCENTRA CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS SUBORDINATE
AGENT AND FIFTH THIRD BANK, AS SENIOR AGENT, UNDER WHICH THIS NOTE AND THE MAKER’S OBLIGATIONS HEREUNDER ARE SUBORDINATED
IN THE MANNER SET FORTH THEREIN TO THE PRIOR PAYMENT OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS AND OBLIGATIONS TO THE HOLDERS OF SENIOR FACILITY
DEBT AS DEFINED IN THE SUBORDINATION AND INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENT.


 


Note


 


	$13,000,000.00	July 20, 2016


 


For
Value Received, the undersigned, Limbach
Facility Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Borrower”), hereby unconditionally
promises to pay to Alcentra Capital Corporation (the “Lender”) or its registered assigns at the principal office
of the Lender (or such other location as the Lender may designate to the Borrower), in immediately available funds, the principal
sum of THIRTEEN MILLION DOLLARS ($13,000,000.00) or, if less, the aggregate unpaid
principal amount of the Loan made or maintained by the Lender to the Borrower pursuant to the Loan Agreement (as defined below),
together with interest on the principal amount of such Loan from time to time outstanding hereunder at the rates, and payable in
the manner and on the dates, specified in the Loan Agreement.


 


This Note (this “Note”)
is one of the Notes referred to in the Loan Agreement dated as of July 20, 2016, among the Borrower, Limbach Holdings LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (the “Parent”), the other Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, and
Alcentra Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation, as Agent (as amended, restated, modified or supplemented from time to time,
the “Loan Agreement”), and this Note and the holder hereof are entitled to all the benefits and security provided
for thereby or referred to therein, to which Loan Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement thereof. All defined terms
used in this Note, except terms otherwise defined herein, shall have the same meaning as in the Loan Agreement. This Note shall
be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflicts of law provisions
(other than Sections 5-1401 and 5-1402 of the New York General Obligations law).


 


Voluntary prepayments
may be made hereon, certain prepayments are required to be made hereon, and this Note may be declared due prior to the expressed
maturity hereof, all in the events, on the terms and in the manner as provided for in the Loan Agreement.


 


The Borrower hereby
waives demand, presentment, protest or notice of any kind hereunder.


 


[Signature
Page to Follow]


 




     


     


    

 


In
Witness Whereof, the Borrower has caused this Note to be duly executed and delivered on the date set forth above by the
duly authorized representative of the Borrower.


 


	 	Limbach Facility Services LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ John T. Jordan Jr.
	 	 	Name 	John T. Jordan Jr.
	 	 	Title	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


 


[Signature Page to Note]
Exhibit
10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO.
1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment No. 1”)
is entered into and effective as of August 1, 2005, by and between
Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (“ACT”) and Michael D. West (“WEST”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.            ACT
and WEST entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated December 31,
2004 (the “Original Agreement”).


 


B.            ACT
and WEST desire to amend certain provisions of the Original Agreement pursuant
to the terms and conditions of this Amendment No. 1.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual premises and covenants set forth herein, ACT and WEST hereby agree as
follows:


 


1.             Section 4.    The second sentence of Section 4
(entitled “Stock Options”) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety and
replaced by the following sentence:


 


The Options will vest over four (4) years
commencing as of December 31, 2004, as follows:  The shares subject to the Option shall vest
1/48th per month at the end of each full month of employment.


 


2.             Remaining
Provisions.  Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Amendment No.1, the remaining provisions of the Original
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and the miscellaneous
provisions are incorporated herein by this reference.


 


3.             Entire Agreement.   This Amendment No. 1 and the Original
Agreement (and any related agreement pertaining to the grant of the Option)
constitute the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof and no party shall be liable or bound to any other party in any
manner by any warranties, representations or covenants except as specifically
set forth herein or therein.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1
as of the date first written above.


 


	
   

  	
  ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ William Caldwell, IV

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  William Caldwell, IV

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  CEO

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Michael D. West

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Michael D. West
Eugene S. BALL, Peggy M. Ball, Patricia G. Miller and Kenneth C. Miller, Sr. v. Robert E. MAYNARD, Jr,

No. 352P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Gregory E. Floyd, Richard J. Archie, Kinston, Richard T. Rodgers, Jr., for Maynard.

H. Kenneth Stephens, II, Wilmington, for Eugene Ball, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 645 S.E.2d 890.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of July 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."
STATE of North Carolina v. William Thomas BAUBERGER.

No. 172A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 15, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 626 S.E.2d 700 (2006), finding no error in judgments entered on 15 August 2003 and an order denying defendant's Motion for Appropriate Relief entered on 4 February 2004, all entered by Judge John O. Craig, III, in Superior Court, Forsyth County, following jury verdicts finding defendant guilty of second-degree murder and assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury. Heard in the Supreme Court 22 November 2006.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Counsel, for the State.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Hillsborough, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Justice WAINWRIGHT took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. *See State v. Harrison,* 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); *Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co.,* 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); *Robinson v. Byrd,* 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Jones, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 783]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered April 10, 2002, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and the facts, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials is granted, and a new trial is ordered.

Once a suspect in custody unequivocally requests counsel, he may not be questioned further in the absence of an attorney *(see People v Glover,*87 NY2d 838 [1995]; *People v Cunningham,*49 NY2d 203 [1980]). Whether a particular request is or is not unequivocal is a mixed question of law and fact that must be determined with reference to the circumstances surrounding the request including the defendant’s demeanor, manner of expression, and the particular words used by him *(see People v Mitchell,*2 NY3d 272 [2004]; *People v Bacalocostantis,*121 AD2d 812, 814 [1986]). Here, the defendant’s statements, viewed in context, articulated his desire to have counsel present such that a reasonable police officer should have understood that he was requesting an attorney *(see Davis v United States,*512 US 452 [1994]; *see also People v Lubanski,*148 AD2d 947, 948 [1989]). In view of this finding, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to suppress his statements should have been granted *(see People v Esposito,*68 NY2d 961 [1986]). Since the error in admitting the defendant’s confession was not harmless, we reverse and order a new trial *(see People v Jones,*61 AD2d 264, 268 [1978], *affd*47 NY2d 528 [1979]).

*430The defendant’s remaining contentions need not be addressed in light of the foregoing determination. Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Cozier and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
McNEELY v. McNEELY.

No. COA07-483.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 5, 2008.

Certification Date February 25, 2008.

Appeal from Transylvania (04CVD338).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 321A/11 w

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 321A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 6111 września 2018 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 321A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 6111 września 2018

---

| Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | Sprostowania |
| 2018/C 321 A/01 | Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o konkursie otwartym – EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 – Uzbrojeni funkcjonariusze ochrony (SC 1/SC 2) ( Dz.U. C 305 A z 30.8.2018 ) | 1 |

Spis treśći

Strona

Sprostowania

2018/C 321 A/01

Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o konkursie otwartym – EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 – Uzbrojeni funkcjonariusze ochrony (SC 1/SC 2) ( Dz.U. C 305 A z 30.8.2018 )

( Dz.U. C 305 A z 30.8.2018 )

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Sprostowania

| 11.9.2018 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 321/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2018

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 321/1

---

Sprostowanie do ogłoszenia o konkursie otwartym – EPSO/AST-SC/07/18 – Uzbrojeni funkcjonariusze ochrony (SC 1/SC 2)

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 305 A z dnia 30 sierpnia 2018 r.
  )

(2018/C 321 A/01)

Strona 8, załącznik II:

| zamiast: | „1. | co najmniej trzyletnie doświadczenie zawodowe uzyskane w ciągu ostatnich sześciu lat w dziedzinie uzbrojonej ochrony lub interwencji w ramach rządowych, krajowych lub międzynarodowych służb bezpieczeństwa publicznego, w tym w prywatnych firmach ochroniarskich świadczących usługi na rzecz międzynarodowych organizacji publicznych, stałych przedstawicielstw lub misji dyplomatycznych. Aby zostało ono uwzględnione, doświadczenie to musi być dodatkowe w stosunku do doświadczenia wymaganego do przystąpienia do konkursu;”, |
| --- | --- | --- |

zamiast:

„1.

co najmniej trzyletnie doświadczenie zawodowe uzyskane w ciągu ostatnich sześciu lat w dziedzinie uzbrojonej ochrony lub interwencji w ramach rządowych, krajowych lub międzynarodowych służb bezpieczeństwa publicznego, w tym w prywatnych firmach ochroniarskich świadczących usługi na rzecz międzynarodowych organizacji publicznych, stałych przedstawicielstw lub misji dyplomatycznych. Aby zostało ono uwzględnione, doświadczenie to musi być dodatkowe w stosunku do doświadczenia wymaganego do przystąpienia do konkursu;”,

| powinno być: | „1. | co najmniej trzyletnie doświadczenie zawodowe uzyskane w ciągu ostatnich ośmiu lat w dziedzinie uzbrojonej ochrony lub interwencji w ramach rządowych, krajowych lub międzynarodowych służb bezpieczeństwa publicznego. Aby zostało ono uwzględnione, doświadczenie to musi być dodatkowe w stosunku do doświadczenia wymaganego do przystąpienia do konkursu;”. |
| --- | --- | --- |

powinno być:

„1.

co najmniej trzyletnie doświadczenie zawodowe uzyskane w ciągu ostatnich ośmiu lat w dziedzinie uzbrojonej ochrony lub interwencji w ramach rządowych, krajowych lub międzynarodowych służb bezpieczeństwa publicznego. Aby zostało ono uwzględnione, doświadczenie to musi być dodatkowe w stosunku do doświadczenia wymaganego do przystąpienia do konkursu;”.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3156 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3156

    To require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a 
standard to preclude commercials from being broadcast at louder volumes 
               than the program material they accompany.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2008

  Mr. Wicker introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a 
standard to preclude commercials from being broadcast at louder volumes 
               than the program material they accompany.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commercial Advertisement Loudness 
Mitigation Act''.

SEC. 2. RULEMAKING ON LOUD COMMERCIALS REQUIRED.

    (a) Regulation Required.--Within one year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall 
prescribe pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et 
seq.) a regulation that provides, in connection with any video 
programming that is broadcast or that is distributed by any 
multichannel video programming distributor, that--
            (1) advertisements accompanying such video programming 
        shall not be excessively noisy or strident;
            (2) such advertisements shall not be presented at 
        modulation levels substantially higher than the program 
        material that such advertisements accompany; and
            (3) the average maximum loudness of such advertisements 
        shall not be substantially higher than the average maximum 
        loudness of the program material that such advertisements 
        accompany.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the terms ``video 
programming'' and ``multichannel video programming distributor'' have 
the meanings given such terms in section 602 of Communications Act of 
1934 (47 U.S.C. 522).
                                 <all>
```
Tom I. DAVIS, II, Co-Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Kyle Davis (Deceased); and Bobby Buff, Co-Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Kyle Davis (Deceased) v. SGT. PEPPERS RESTAURANT AND BAR, INC.; O'Charley's, Inc.; John S. Brown; Gregory A. Brown; and Terry C. Brown.

No. 535P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Forrest A. Ferrell, Jeffry T. Mackie, Hickory, Jason White, for Davis and Buff.

Mel J. Garofalo, Lucian P. Sbarra, Margaret M. Kingston, Charlotte, C. Kailani Memmer, for O'Charley's Inc.

John T. Jeffries, Janiere E. Taylor, Charlotte, for Sgt. Peppers Restaurant & Bar.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 5th day of November 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
STATE v. Darrell W. MILLER.

No. 479P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 8, 2007.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of September 2007 by Defendant for a Discretionary Review by the Supreme Court:

*707"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of November 2007."
Exhibit 32










CERTIFICATION
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(UNITED
STATES CODE, TITLE 18, CHAPTER 63, SECTION 1350


ACCOMPANYING
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF


CENTERLINE
HOLDING COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008








In
connection with the Annual Report of Centerline Holding Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Marc D. Schnitzer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Robert L.
Levy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:




(1)      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of our Company.




By:
            
            /s/ Marc D. Schnitzer
            
            By:
            
            /s/ Robert L. LevyMarc
      D. Schnitzer
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
              February
      24, 2010
            
            
            
            Robert
      L. Levy
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer and
              Principal
      Accounting Officer)
              February
      24, 2010








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.