alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ARCHIBALD CANDY CORPORATION AS OF AUGUST 29, 1998 AND
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-29-1998
<CASH>                                          13,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (254)
<INVENTORY>                                     24,602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,369
<PP&E>                                          53,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                (32,676)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,381
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,089
<SALES>                                        126,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,742
<CGS>                                           43,978
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                       276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 51828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17252]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Establishment

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. Appendix 2), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 
announces the establishment of the Board of Scientific Counselors, 
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (Committee).
    This Committee shall advise the Director, NIH; the Deputy director 
for Intramural Research, NIH; the Director, National Center for 
Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM); and the Scientific 
Director, NCCAM, on the intramural research programs through periodic 
visits to the laboratories for assessment of the research in progress, 
the proposed research, and evaluation of the productivity and 
performance of tenured, tenure track and staff scientists and 
physicians.
    The Committee will consist of eight members, including the Chair, 
appointed by the Director, NIH, from authorities knowledgeable about 
conventional and complementary and alternative medicine research in the 
fields of interest to NCCAM.
    Duration of this committee is continuing unless formally determined 
by the Director, NIH, that termination would be in the best public 
interest.

    Dated: August 17, 2005.
Elias A. Zerhouni,
Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 05-17252 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# L_2013022EN.01002001.xml

| 25.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 22/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 22/20

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 22 January 2013

appointing two Dutch members of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/58/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Dutch Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | Two members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr J.C. (Co) VERDAAS and Ms A.E. (Anne) BLIEK-DE JONG, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr J.C. (Co) VERDAAS and Ms A.E. (Anne) BLIEK-DE JONG,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as members for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Ms Annemieke TRAAG, member of the Executive Council of the Province of Gelderland, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Annemieke TRAAG, member of the Executive Council of the Province of Gelderland,

| — | Mr A. GIJSBERTS, member of the Executive Council of the Province of Flevoland. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr A. GIJSBERTS, member of the Executive Council of the Province of Flevoland.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 22 January 2013.

For the Council

The President

M. NOONAN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
10-Q Exhibit 32.2: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iShares COMEX Gold Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham, Chief Financial Officer of Barclays Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the
Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                              |  |               
|----------------------------- |  | --------------
|Date:                         |  | August 7, 2008
|                             
|/s/ Michael A. Latham        
|Michael A. Latham *          
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors International, Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-129245) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-128728 and 333-109475) of SigmaTel, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                          
|--------------------------
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                          
|Austin, Texas             
|March 14, 2007
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 242/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 242/2014 of 7 March 2014 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications (Lammefjordskartofler (PGI))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 242/2014                     

# of 7 March 2014

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Lammefjordskartofler                        (PGI))                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Denmark’s application to register the name ‘Lammefjordskartofler’                              was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Lammefjordskartofler’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 March 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.6.****Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed**U.K.

#### DENMARKU.K.

Lammefjordskartofler (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 286, 2.1.2013, p. 3.
EXHIBIT 10.2
 APOLLO GROUP, INC.
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 ARTICLE 1
 PURPOSE
  ARTICLE 2
 EFFECTIVE DATE
  ARTICLE 3
 DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION




---



##### 



-2-




---



##### 



-3-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 4
 ADMINISTRATION
       -4-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 5
 SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
     -5-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 6
 ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION
     ARTICLE 7
 STOCK OPTIONS
       -6-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 8
 STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
  -7-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 9
 PERFORMANCE SHARES
  -8-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 10
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
     ARTICLE 11
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS
    -9-




---



##### 



-10-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 12
 PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS
     -11-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 13
 PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO AWARDS
       -12-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 14
 CHANGES IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE
  ARTICLE 15
 AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION, AND TERMINATION
   -13-




---



##### 



ARTICLE 16
 GENERAL PROVISIONS
    -14-




---



##### 



-15-




---



##### 



-16-
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ PUBLIC PATENT FOUNDATION, INC. , Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v. MCNEIL

- PPC, INC. ,

Defendant

- Appellee
,
v. UNITED STATES , Intervenor

- Appellee.

__________________________ 2012

- 1274

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 09

- CV

- 5471 , Judge Katherine B. Forrest

.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ Before L OURIE , B RYSON , and M OORE , Circuit Judge s

.
L OURIE , Circuit Judge

. O R D E R Case: 12-1274 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 05/03/2013PUBLIC PATENT FOUNDATION , INC

. v. MCNEIL

- PPC , INC

. 2

Public Patent Foundation, Inc. (PubPat) moves for summary affirmance. McNeil

- PPC, Inc. (McNeil) responds. PubPat brought suit in June 2009 against McNeil for falsely marking and advertising certain products. In September 2011, Co n gress enacted the Leahy

- Smith America Invents Act (AIA), which, among other changes, eliminated stan d ing in false marking cases for third parties that have not su f fered a competitive injury a s a result of the false marking. The change was applied retroactively to pending false marking cases. As a result of the changes enacted by the AIA, the district court held that PubPat no longer had standing to pursue this case and dismissed the action. PubPat argues that this court’s decision in Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing Inc. , 702 F.3d 624 (Fed. Cir. 2012), requires summary affirmance of the district court’s jud gment. McNeil agrees that Brooks requires affirmance of the district court’s judgment, but raises concerns about PubPat’s previous arguments that this case is disti nguishable from cases such as Brooks because of the timing of filing. Summary affirmance of a case “is appropriate, inter alia , when the position of one party is so clearly corre ct as a matter of law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal exists.” Joshua v. United States , 17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994). We find that summary affirmance is appropriate here. In Brooks , this court held that Congress’s retroactive application of the false marking provision of the AIA does not violate the Due Process Clause or the Intellectual Property Clause of the Constitution. Brooks , 702 F.3d at 625

- 26 . This court has also held that the AIA’s change to the false mar king provisio n “appl[ies] to all cases, without Case: 12-1274 Document: 54 Page: 2 Filed: 05/03/2013PUBLIC PATENT FOUNDATION , INC

. v. MCNEIL

- PPC , INC

. 3

exception, that are pending on, or commenced on or after, the date of the enactment” of the AIA. Hall v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. , 705 F.3d 1357, 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (quo ting AIA, Pub. L. No. 112

- 29, §16(b)(4), 125 Stat. 284, 329 (2011) )

. Accordingly , I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The district court’s judgment is summarily a ffirmed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. (3) All other pending motions are moot.
F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s 24 Case: 12-1274 Document: 54 Page: 3 Filed: 05/03/2013
STATE of North Carolina v. Dwight McDOUGALD.

No. 64A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 7, 2008.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the *352Court of Appeals, 181 N.C.App. 41, 638 S.E.2d 546 (2007), finding no error in judgments entered 12 April 2005 by Judge Jerry Cash Martin in Superior Court, Guilford County. On 11 October 2007, the Supreme Court allowed defendant's petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 February 2008.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John P. Scherer II, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Irving Joyner, Cary, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals to this Court from the decision of the Court of Appeals on the basis of a dissent. In light of the State's concession of error, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the appealable issue of right i.e. whether it was appropriate to dismiss defendant's appeal on procedural grounds. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals to determine if any error under *Georgia v. Randolph,*547 U.S. 103, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d 208 (2006) was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The remaining issues addressed by the Court of Appeals are not before this Court and its decision as to these issues remains undisturbed.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
IN RE C.C.R.

No. COA07-1065.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 5, 2008.

Certification Date February 25, 2008.

Appeal from Watauga (05J3).

Cases reported without published opinion. Reversed.
Exhibit 4.6





 


AMENDMENT
TO XL GROUP PLC


1991
PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PROGRAM


 


(as
amended and restated on May 13, 2016)


 


WHEREAS, XL Group plc has petitioned the High
Court of Ireland to approve a Scheme of Arrangement under the Irish Companies Act, the effect of which would be to impose a new
holding company, incorporated in Bermuda, XL Group Ltd, as the ultimate parent holding company of the XL group of companies (the
“Redomestication”); and


 


WHEREAS, XL Group plc maintains the 1991 Performance
Incentive Program, as amended and restated on May 13, 2016 (the “Program”); and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to its authority under Article
X, Paragraph A of the Program, the Board of Directors of XL Group plc wishes to amend the Program in connection with the Redomestication;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:


 


		1.	THAT, the title of the Program shall be the “XL Group Ltd (formerly XL Group plc) 1991 Performance Incentive Program
(as amended and restated on May 13, 2016).”



 


		2.	THAT, the Program shall be amended such that each occurrence of the term “XL Group plc” shall instead refer to
“XL Group Ltd”.



 


		3.	THAT, the definition of “Company” in Article I, Paragraph B of the Program shall be amended to read in its entirety
as follows:



 


“Company” shall mean
XL Group Ltd, a Bermuda company, any other entity in which XL Group Ltd owns 20% or more of the ordinary voting power or equity,
and any successor in a reorganization or similar transaction.


 


		4.	THAT, the foregoing amendments shall become effective, and shall be conditioned, upon the consummation of the Redomestication.



 


		5.	THAT, except as expressly amended hereby, the Program remains in full force and effect.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<CASH>                                              80
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,448
<PP&E>                                         379,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                 211,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,641
<BONDS>                                        194,216
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,618
<COMMON>                                           985
<OTHER-SE>                                    (38,062)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,398
<SALES>                                         34,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,359
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    455
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                455
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       455
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
IN RE T.J.M.

No. COA07-357.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from Burke (03J168).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,189,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,754,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     273,168,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (20,819,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             263,016,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     41,449,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       203,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 194,608,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               263,016,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,899,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,503,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             717,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,679,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,679,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,679,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,679,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>