alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1240/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1240/2013 of 25 November 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications (Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes (PGI))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1240/2013                     

# of 25 November 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pembrokeshire                        Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes (PGI))                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Pembrokeshire                              Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes’ was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.6.****Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed**U.K.

#### UNITED KINGDOMU.K.

Pembrokeshire Earlies/Pembrokeshire Early Potatoes (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 180, 26.6.2013, p. 17.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 461/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 461/2014 of 5 May 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 461/2014                     

# of 5 May 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 May 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 296/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 296/2014 of 20 March 2014 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for            a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Neufchâtel (PDO)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 296/2014                     

# of 20 March 2014

# approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin                        and protected geographical indications [Neufchâtel (PDO)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France’s                              application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Neufchâtel’, registered                              under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96(2).

(2)Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission                              published the amendment application in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.

(3)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments                              to the specification should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The amendments to the specification published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.3****Cheeses**U.K.

#### FRANCEU.K.

Neufchâtel (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 148, 21.6.1996, p. 1.                           

3

OJ C 316, 30.10.2013, p. 14.
STATE v. Richard Lionel COOK.

No. 341A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 17, 2007.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Counsel, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*372The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of December 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Cook) shall have up to and including the 31st day of January 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of December 2007."
Letter of Extension


EXHIBIT 10.1




LOGICQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC.

5 Independence Way, Suite 300, Princeton, NJ 08540

United States of America




July 22, 2016




Logicquest Technology Limited

P.O. box 957, Offshore Incorporations Centre

Road Town, Tortola, B.V.I.

Attention: Yew Siong Cheng




Dear Mr. Cheng




Re:    Letter of Intent for the combination of Logicquest Technology Limited (“Logicquest”) and Logicquest Technology Inc. (“Pubco”)




We refer to our letter dated March 31, 2016 in relation to the captioned matter (“Letter of Intent”), and the discussion between your Mr. Cheng and us on June 30, 2016 (“Discussion”).




Based on our Discussion, we have agreed to extend all the deadlines stipulated in the Letter of Intent, being June 30, 2016, to October 31, 2016.




Kindly confirm our understanding above by signing the confirmation below.




Thank you.




Yours very truly




LOGICQUEST TECHNOLOGY INC.







			
	By:

	/s/ Ang Woon Han

	 

	 
	Authorized Signatory

	 






Agreed and confirmed the above this 22nd day of July, 2016.




LOGICQUEST TECHNOLOGY LIMITED







			
	By:

	/s/ Yew Siong Cheng

	 

	 
	Authorized Signatory
# Council Decision 2014/205/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/205/CFSP of 10 April 2014 amending Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against            certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/205/CFSP                     

# of 10 April 2014

# amending Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the                        situation in Iran                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)On 12 April 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/235/CFSP(1).

(2)On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/235/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 13 April 2015.

(3)The entries concerning certain persons included in Annex to Decision 2011/235/CFSP should be updated.

(4)Decision 2011/235/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Article 6(2) of Decision 2011/235/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘2.This Decision shall apply until 13 April 2015. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as                           appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.                  

# Article 2U.K.

The Annex to Decision 2011/235/CFSP shall be amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 10 April 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

D. Kourkoulas                            

## ANNEXU.K.

The entries for the persons listed below shall replace the entries for them set out in the Annex to Decision 2011/235/CFSP:

### **Persons**U.K.

1

Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP of 12 April 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities                              in view of the situation in Iran (OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51).
IN RE S.L.E.

No. COA07-560.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Buncombe (06J139, 02CVD2235).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated in part.
STATE v. LARSON.

No. COA07-472.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Davidson (04CRS62473, 04CRS62474, 04CRS62475, 04CRS62479).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Francisco Garcia, Also Known as Carlos Estrada, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 646]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 17, 2003 *(People v Garcia,*303 AD2d 600 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 17, 1999.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz, 2*NY3d 277 [2004]). Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Crane and Goldstein, JJ, concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40737

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HECTOR HERNANDEZ-MESA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CR-1902-ALL

--------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Hector Hernandez-Mesa appeals his sentence following a

guilty-plea conviction for being an alien found in the United

States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

For the first time, Hernandez-Mesa argues that the district

court committed reversible plain error by adding 16 levels to his

base offense level because he was convicted, prior to

deportation, of a felony alien smuggling offense pursuant to 8

U.S.C. § 1324. Because he was convicted of transporting illegal
No. 04-40737

-2-

aliens, an offense different from alien smuggling, Hernandez-Mesa

concludes that the addition of 16 levels was unwarranted. He

concedes that this argument is foreclosed by United States v.

Solis-Campozano, 312 F.3d 164, 167-68 (5th Cir. 2002). He

nevertheless seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme

Court review. 

In Solis-Campozano, we concluded that all of the offenses

listed in § 1324(a)(1)(A), which include transporting and

harboring illegal aliens, are “alien smuggling” offenses for

purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(vii). 312 F.3d at 167-68. 

Hernandez-Mesa’s argument is thus foreclosed. See id. 

For the first time, Hernandez-Mesa argues that the felony

and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are

unconstitutional, both facially and as applied, under Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). He correctly concedes that this

argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), but

nevertheless he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme

Court review. See United States v. Izaguirre-Flores, 405 F.3d

270, 277-78 (5th Cir. 2005) (noting that the Supreme Court in

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres), petition for cert.

filed (July 22, 2005) (No. 05-5469). 

Hernandez-Mesa argues for the first time in a supplemental

letter brief that his sentence is illegal under United States v.

Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), because the district court
No. 04-40737

-3-

sentenced him under the mistaken belief that the guidelines were

mandatory. Review is for plain error. United States v.

Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 732-33 (5th Cir. 2005),

petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556). Nothing

in the record indicates that the district court would have

imposed a different sentence had the guidelines been advisory. 

Id.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21



               Subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2007
               ---------------------------------------------------

Centerline Holding Company, a Delaware statutory trust

Centerline Holding Trust, a Delaware statutory trust

Centerline Capital Group Inc., a Delaware corporation

Centerline/AC Investors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

                    Subsidiaries of Centerline Holding Trust
                    ----------------------------------------

Centerline Equity Issuer Trust, a Delaware statutory trust

                  Subsidiary of Centerline Equity Issuer Trust
                  --------------------------------------------

Centerline Origination Trust I, a Delaware statutory trust

                  Subsidiaries of Centerline Capital Group Inc.
                  ---------------------------------------------

Centerline Capital Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Centerline Servicing Inc., a Delaware corporation

                  Subsidiary of Centerline Capital Company LLC
                  ---------------------------------------

Centerline Affordable Housing Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

            Subsidiary of Centerline Affordable Housing Advisors LLC
            --------------------------------------------------------

Centerline Manager LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

                    Subsidiary of Centerline/AC Investors LLC
                    -----------------------------------------

Centerline Investors I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

                    Subsidiary of Centerline Investors I LLC
                    ----------------------------------------

Centerline REIT, Inc., a Delaware corporation
SECOND FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                        CLUBCORP STOCK INVESTMENT PLAN


     Amendment  made  this  22nd  day  of  April,  1997,  by  Club Corporation
International  (the  "Company").

                             W I T N E S S E T H:
                             --------------------

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  maintains  the  ClubCorp  Stock  Investment Plan,
effective  January  1,  1995  (the  "Plan");  and

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  now  desires  to  amend  the Plan to provide that
Matching  Contributions  may  also  be  made  in  the  form  of  cash;  and

     WHEREAS,  the  Plan  may  be  amended  by  the  Company  pursuant  to the
provisions  of  Article  XV  of the Plan, and the Company desires to amend the
Plan:

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows, effective as of April 22,
1997:

1.     Existing Section 4.01 is amended by deleting the fourth sentence in its
entirety  and  substituting  the  following  in  its  place:

"All  Matching  Contributions  shall  be made in the form of cash or shares of
Company  Stock."


     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  Amendment has been executed the day and year
first  above  written.

CLUB  CORPORATION  INTERNATIONAL



By:    Terry  A.  Taylor

Its:      Secretary
EX-10.65



 Exhibit 10.65 
 ANNUAL BASE SALARIES APPROVED FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 OF

 WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. 

Effective June 28, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) approved base salary increases for the following named executive officers. Mr. Gilmore’s base salary increase became effective June 1, 2016 to align with his position change. For Messrs. Russell, Rose and
Winland, base salary increases become effective September 1, 2016. The Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer, John P. McConnell, turned down the base salary increase recommended for him by the Compensation Committee. 

 

					
	 Name and Principal Position
	  	Base Salary	 
		
	 Mark A. Russell

President and Chief Operating Officer of the Registrant
	  	$	541,100	  
		
	 B. Andrew Rose

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant
	  	$	489,100	  
		
	 Geoffrey G. Gilmore

President, Worthington Cylinder Corporation
	  	$	480,000	  
		
	 Virgil L. Winland

Senior Vice President-Manufacturing of the Registrant
	  	$	364,971
Exhibit 32.1

VERTICALNET, INC.

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I,
Nathanael V. Lentz, President and Chief Executive Officer of Verticalnet, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

(1) The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 10-K) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    NATHANAEL V.
LENTZNathanael V. Lentz President and Chief Executive Officer  Date: March 31, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Verticalnet, Inc. and will be retained by Verticalnet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.