alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,818
<SECURITIES>                                   150,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,319
<PP&E>                                         193,062
<DEPRECIATION>                               (109,305)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 397,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,283,908
<BONDS>                                      1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,275
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,927,205)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   397,301
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (505,832)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (647,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 43,451
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   101,256
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
STATE v. Paul Dewayne CUMMINGS.

No. 1A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 13, 2007.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Paul Dewayne Cummings.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of June 2007 by Attorney General to File Responsive Supplemental Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 13th day of June 2007."
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7008

AALON SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA MEDICAL DEPARTMENT FOR THE DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS; PAGE TRUE, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (1:05-cv-00138-GBL)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aalon Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Aalon Smith appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to reconsider his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Va. Med. Dep’t for

the Dep’t of Corrs., No. 1:05-cv-00138-GBL (E.D. Va. filed May 3,

2006 & entered May 4, 2006). We deny Smith’s motion to be

relocated to another facility. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
STATE v. Johnnie L. HARRINGTON.

No. 441P92-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of February 2007 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of March 2007."
INTERLOCAL RISK FINANCING FUND OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RYALS.

No. COA06-1607.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (05CVS14303).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 May
      10, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      David A. JacksonDavid
      A. JacksonChief
      Financial Officer
 
 
 A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight
Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
  Back to Form
10-Q
In the Matter of C.N.R., Minor Child. appealed by Petitioners Mary Margaret J. and Brandon J.

No. 368P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Terry F. Rose, Smithfield, for Margaret and Brandon J.

Susan J. Hall, for Father.

Peter Wood, for Mother.

W.A. Holland, Smithfield, Jennifer S. O'Connor, for Johnston County DSS.

James Johnson, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of July 2006 by Petitioners (Mary Margaret J. and Brandon J.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) 

 

I, Michael E. Spicer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Transition Report on Form 10-K of NovaDel Pharma Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [intentionally omitted] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

| Date:  March 26, 2007 | By:    | /S/ MICHAEL E. SPICER                      |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Michael E. Spicer                          |
|                  |   | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Man Keung Alan Wai, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



|/s/ Man Keung Alan Wai  | 
|----------------------- | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|March 31, 2017          | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and
will be retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ARMSTRONG v. ALBRIGHT.

No. 491P06-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Burton & Sue, Greensboro, for Albright.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of May 2007 by Plaintiff for judgment with supporting affidavit and documentation in his favor and against appellees:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of December 2007."
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-31285

Summary Calendar

 

HILTON JOSEPH WRIGHT,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General,

State of Louisiana; BURL CAIN, Acting Warden,

Louisiana State Penitentiary,

Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1225-D

- - - - - - - - - -

October 24, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hilton Wright, #97085, appeals the district court’s judgment

denying his petition for habeas corpus relief. Wright contends

that testimony at his state-court trial regarding an uncounseled

lineup was erroneously admitted; that photographic identification

procedures in his case were impermissibly suggestive; and that

this court should consider an affidavit sworn by Simon Duplessis.
No. 95-31285

- 2 -

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and we find no reversible error. We affirm the disposition of

Wright’s contention regarding the uncounseled lineup for

essentially the reasons relied on by the district court. See

Wright v. Ieyoub, No. 95-CV-1225-D (E.D. La. Nov. 22, 1995). 

Wright’s contention that the photographic lineup displays in the

case were unduly suggestive is conclusional; his contention does

not raise a constitutional issue. See Koch v. Puckett, 907 F.2d

524, 530 (5th Cir. 1990). Finally, Wright has not shown that

Duplessis’s statement was not reasonably available to him during

his state-court proceedings. See Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293,

317 (1963).

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1591-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Maine (FEMA-1591-DR), dated June 29, 2005, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 10, 2005.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Maine is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of June 29, 2005: 

Aroostook County for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 05-17169 Filed 8-29-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Number                                                                    Shares




                             AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY
             (Incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware)


This Certifies that _________________________________ is the owner of
_______________________ Shares of the Series B Preferred Stock of AMERICAN
SKIING COMPANY transferable only on the Books of the Corporation by the holder
hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney on Surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof of the duly authorized officers of this corporation have
hereunto subscribed their names and caused the Corporate Seal to be hereto
affixed.

At ____________ this _________________ day of ___________________ A.D. _________


                           SHARES Par Value $.01 EACH



<PAGE>


                                   CERTIFICATE

                                       FOR



                                     SHARES

                                     OF THE

                                    SERIES B
                                 PREFERRED STOCK

                             AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY

                                    ISSUED TO

                     --------------------------------------

                                      DATED

                      -------------------------------------


THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. SUCH SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED SOLD,
OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED, PLEDGED OR HYPOTHECATED EXCEPT PURSUANT TO (i) A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO SUCH SECURITIES WHICH IS EFFECTIVE UNDER
SUCH ACT, OR (ii) RULE 144 UNDER SUCH ACT, OR (iii) ANY OTHER EXEMPTION FROM
REGISTRATION UNDER SUCH ACT RELATING TO THE DISPOSITION OF SECURITIES.

THE STATEMENT OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SERIES OF SHARES RELATING TO SUCH
SHARES FORMING A PART OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THIS CORPORATION
CONTAINS A FULL STATEMENT OF THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES LIMITATIONS AND
RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE. THE CORPORATION
WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE A FULL STATEMENT
OF THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THESE
SHARES EACH CLASS AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED AND THE VARIATIONS IN RELATIVE RIGHTS
AND PREFERENCES BETWEEN THE SERIES OF PREFERRED STOCK ISSUED BY THIS
CORPORATION.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00672-CV

SAN ANTONIO VILLA DEL SOL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Appellant

v.

Michael MCCORMACK, Michael Hopkins, Dora Alexander, and Diana Alaniz,

Appellees

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023-CI-11817

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 4, 2023

DISMISSED

Appellant moved to dismiss this appeal. Appellees have not objected to the motion. 

Appellant’s motion is granted; this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f); 

Caballero v. Heart of Tex. Pizza, L.L.C., 70 S.W.3d 180, 181 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2001, no 

pet.) (en banc) (per curiam).

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3211 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3211

 To amend the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, 
     and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007, to clarify 
             eligibility for livestock indemnity payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2008

   Mr. Baucus (for himself, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Thune) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, 
     and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007, to clarify 
             eligibility for livestock indemnity payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIVESTOCK INDEMNITY PAYMENTS.

    Section 9002 of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina 
Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 
110-28; 121 Stat. 214), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(5)(B)(iii), by striking ``if such 
        notice applies to a county included under (ii)''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) by striking ``There are hereby appropriated'' 
                and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--There are appropriated'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (A) (as so designated), by 
                striking ``due to a disaster, as determined by the 
                Secretary'' and inserting ``due to any natural 
                disaster'';
                    (C) by striking ``To be eligible'' and inserting 
                the following:
                    ``(B) Inclusion.--Eligible livestock losses under 
                this subsection shall include the death of livestock in 
                a disaster county due to a natural disaster, regardless 
                of whether the death is related to any natural disaster 
                that is the basis for a natural disaster declaration 
                for the disaster county.
                    ``(C) Eligibility requirements.--To be eligible''; 
                and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Deadline for applications.--To be eligible 
                for assistance under this subsection, producers on a 
                farm shall submit applications for assistance under 
                this subsection not later than 180 days after the date 
                of enactment of this subparagraph.''.
                                 <all>
```