alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. FERNWOOD HILL TOWNHOME HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.

No. 492P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

James M. Stanley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for DOT.

Stephanie H. Autry, George B. Autry, Jr., Raleigh, for Homeowners' Asso.

*838Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 649 S.E.2d 433.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of October 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."
Exhibit 23.1
  CONSENT
    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
    
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-82615
    on
    Form S-3;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-81059
    on
    Form S-8;
    Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
    Statement
    No. 333-81059
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-81053
    on
    Form S-8;
    Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
    Statement
    No. 333-81053
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-71803
    on
    Form S-3;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-77407
    on
    Form S-3MEF;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-69907
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-69899
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-68183
    on
    Form S-3;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-65447
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-49113
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-96023
    on
    Form S-3;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-51978
    on
    Form S-4;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-50430
    and
    Nos. 333-50430-01
    through
    333-50430-G7
    on
    Form S-3;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-69901
    on
    Form S-8;
    Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
    Statement
    No. 333-69901
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-95791
    on
    Form S-8;
    Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
    Statement
    No. 333-95791
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-46272
    on
    Form S-8;
    Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
    Statement
    No. 333-46272
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-46274
    on
    Form S-8;
    Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
    Statement
    No. 333-46274
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-102052
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-102053
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-109411
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-109426
    and
    Nos. 333-109426-1
    through
    333-109426-261
    on
    Form S-4;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-111463
    and
    Nos. 333-111463-01
    through
    333-111463-263
    on
    Form S-4;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-117065
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-124370
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-142435
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-142436
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-159674
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-159675
    on
    Form S-8;
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-160452
    and
    Nos. 333-160452-01
    through
    333-160452-277
    on
    Form S-3; and
    Registration Statement
    No. 333-161519
    and
    Nos. 333-161519-01
    through
    333-161519-277
    on
    Form S-3.  Form 10-K
  /s/
    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
  Charlotte,
    North Carolina
Exhibit
      32.1








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin
      P. Knight, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/
                Kevin P. KnightChief
                Executive OfficerMay
                9, 2006








*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight
      Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.*




Back
      to Form
      10-Q
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3455 

To rescind unexpended Iraq reconstruction funds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2008 

Mr. DORGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To rescind unexpended Iraq reconstruction funds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rescission of 

5 Unneeded Iraq Reconstruction Funds Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 

8 (1) Iraq has abundant financial resources to 

9 fund relief and reconstruction projects; 

10 (2)(A) in November 2007, the Government of 

11 Iraq estimated that oil income in 2008 would 

12 amount to $35,000,000,000; but 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 3455 IS

1 (B) with high crude oil prices and Iraq oil pro2 duction at record levels, the Special Inspector Gen3 eral for Iraq estimates that oil revenues could exceed 

4 $70,000,000,000; 

5 (3) Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Barham Salih 

6 stated recently that ‘‘Iraq does not need financial as7 sistance.’’; 

8 (4) the Government Accountability Office esti9 mates that the Government of Iraq— 

10 (A) has accumulated a budget surplus of 

11 approximately $29,000,000,000 from fiscal year 

12 2005 through 2007; and 

13 (B) will accumulate a budget surplus of 

14 between $38,200,000,000 and $50,300,000,000 

15 for fiscal year 2008; and 

16 (5) according to the July 2008 quarterly report 

17 of the Special Inspector General for Iraq— 

18 (A) Congress has appropriated 

19 $43,560,000,000 for the major United States 

20 reconstruction accounts in Iraq; but 

(B) over 1 21 ⁄4 of those funds, or 

22 $12,570,000,000, have not yet been expended, 

23 including unobligated funds from appropria24 tions for prior fiscal years. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•S 3455 IS

1 SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF UNEXPENDED IRAQ RECONSTRUC2 TION FUNDS. 

3 There are rescinded any amounts that remain unex4 pended as of the date of enactment of this Act in— 

5 (1) the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund; 

6 (2) the Iraq Security Forces Fund; and 

7 (3) the Economic Support Fund authorized 

8 under chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance 

9 Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2346 et seq.) that are avail10 able for Iraq. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**160 CA 15-01288**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

JEFF CONIBER, DOING BUSINESS AS JEFF CONIBER TRUCKING, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

CENTER POINT TRANSFER STATION, INC., MATTHEW W. LOUGHRY AND KENNETH LOUGHRY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

THE WOLFORD LAW FIRM LLP, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL R. WOLFORD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PIRRELLO, PERSONTE & FEDER, ROCHESTER (STEVEN E. FEDER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Michael M. Mohun, A.J.), dated March 23, 2015. The order, among other things, determined that defendants are liable for breach of contract and ordered that judgment be entered in plaintiff’s favor against defendants, jointly and severally.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Matter of Laborers Intl. Union of N. Am., Local 210, AFL-CIO v Shevlin-Manning, Inc. , 147 AD2d 977).

Entered: March 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
STATE v. TALLEY.

No. COA07-89.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Yadkin (03CRS2079, 03CRS2080, 03CRS2081, 03CRS2082, 03CRS2083, 03CRS2084, 03CRS2085, 03CRS2086, 03CRS2087, 03CRS2088, 03CRS2089, 03CRS2090, 03CRS2091, 03CRS2092, 03CRS2093, 03CRS2094, 03CRS2095, 03CRS2096, 03CRS2097, 03CRS2098).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed and remanded for correction of clerical error.
In the Matter Appeal of Tyleta MORGAN.

No. 582A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 12, 2007.

Charles C. Meeker, Benn A. Brewington, III, Raleigh, for Henderson County.

Fred W. DeVore, III, Charlotte, for Tyleta Morgan.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of December 2007 by NC Association of County Commissioners for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of December 2007."
# L_2013116EN.01001301.xml

| 26.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 116/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 116/13

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 349/2013 of 17 April 2013 amending the rate of additional duty for products listed in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 673/2005 establishing additional customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the United States of America

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 108 of 18 April 2013
  )

On page 8, Annex I should read as follows:

‘ANNEX I

The products on which additional duties are to apply are identified by their eight-digit CN codes. The description of products classified under these codes can be found in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1) as replaced by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1810/2004 (2) as amended by Regulation (EC) No 493/2005 (3).

0710 40 00

9003 19 30

8705 10 00

6204 62 31

---

(1)  
  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 327, 30.10.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 82, 31.3.2005, p. 1.’.

3

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Vivian Chu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Vivian Chu

Chief Financial Officer

April 11, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 10.10





PROMISSORY NOTE





U.S. $10,000,000.00

Los Angeles, CA.





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, The Robert E. and Margaret M.
Petersen Trust (Maker) hereby promises to pay to the order of Advanced Engine Technologies, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, (Holder), on written demand from the Board of Directors of Holder (which demand shall take the form of
a corporate resolution of Holders Board of Directors), the sum of ten million dollars (U.S. $10,000,000.00), until paid in full. No interest shall accrue on this promissory note (Note).





ALL Payments on this Note are to be made, in lawful money of the United States to Holder at 11150 W. Olympic Blvd, Suite 1050, Los
Angeles, California 90064, or at such other place as Holder shall designate to Maker in writing.





Maker may prepay
this Note, in whole or in part, at any time, without prepayment fee or other penalty.





Any payment under this Note
shall be credited to the principal then due under this Note.





This Note is secured by all of the personal property
now or hereafter owned by the Petersen Trust, now or wherever located (Petersen Trust Assets). Holders security interest in the personal property of the Petersen Trust Assets is reflected and described in the Security Agreement
executed by The Petersen Trust, of even date herewith (a true and current copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit A).





This note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with California law. Venue in any action commenced by Holder to collect on this Note shall be in either the
federal courts for the Central District of California or the state courts of the County of Los Angeles.





Whenever
possible each provision of this Note shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Note shall be prohibited by or invalid under such law, such provision shall be ineffective to
the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of such provision or the remaining provisions of this Note.





THE ROBERT E. AND MARGARET M. PETERSEN TRUSTBy:

/s/    ROBERT E.
PETERSENRobert E. PetersenIts:

Trustee





Dated: September 1, 2001
STATE v. TRUJILLO.

No. COA06-2.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Montgomery (04CRS50701, 04CRS50702, 04CRS50847).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. Donnie Dean SHOLAR.

No. 337P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of July 2007 by Defendant for "Petition for Amicus Curiae":

*558"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of August 2007."
Lula SANDERS, Cynthia Eure, Angeline McInerny, Joseph C. Mobley, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. STATE PERSONNEL COMMISSION, a body politic; Office of State Personnel, a body politic; Thomas H. Wright, State Personnel Director (in his official capacity); Teachers' and State Employees' Retirement System of North Carolina, a body politic and corporate; Michael Williamson, Director of the Retirement System Division and Deputy Treasurer of the State of North Carolina (in his official capacity); Richard H. Moore, Treasurer of the State of North Carolina and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Retirement System (in his official capacity); Temporary Solutions, a subdivision of the Office of State Personnel, and State of North Carolina.

No. 262P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Norma S. Harrell, Lars F. Nance, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for State Personnel Commission, et al.

Gregg E. McDougal, David C. Lindsay, Robert G. Hensley, Jr., Raleigh, Jim Kelly, Adam Charnes, Winston-Salem, for Sanders, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 644 S.E.2d 10.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 18th day of June 2007 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
1

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3757

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Ramiro Cabrera Basurto, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: June 26, 2003

 Filed: July 1, 2003 (Corrected: 07/08/03)

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ramiro Cabrera Basurto pleaded guilty to distributing 50 grams or more of a

methamphetamine mixture, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B). The

district court1

 sentenced him to 46 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised

release. On appeal, counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Basurto has not filed a supplemental brief. 
-2-

Counsel argues that Basurto’s sentence was unreasonable considering his

crime, and that a supervised release condition requiring Basurto to report to a

probation office upon reentering the United States violates his Fifth Amendment right

against self-incrimination. As neither of these arguments was raised below, our

review is for plain error. See United States v. Sun Bear, 307 F.3d 747, 750 (8th Cir.

2002), cert. denied, 71 U.S.L.W. 3758 (U.S. June 9, 2003) (No. 02-9418). We reject

counsel’s first argument because Basurto was sentenced within the Guidelines range

corresponding to the Guidelines calculations to which he stipulated in his plea

agreement. See United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995) (defendant

who explicitly and voluntarily exposes himself to specific sentence may not challenge

that punishment on appeal). Nor did the court plainly err in imposing the supervised

release condition. See United States v. Calles-Abrego, 52 Fed. Appx. 320, 321 (8th

Cir. Dec. 12, 2002) (unpublished per curiam) (finding no plain error in imposition of

same condition). 

Having carefully reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the district court. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                                         10
<SECURITIES>                                   3,836,438
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,836,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        3,634,691
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10
<OTHER-SE>                                     193,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,836,854
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,187
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               4,550
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             191,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,886)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,886)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,886)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1> The Company's balance sheet is unclassified.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51758-51759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Threat Reduction Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense 
(Acquisition, Technology and Logistics).

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Threat Reduction Advisory Committee will meet in closed 
session on Thursday, November 3, 2005, at the Institute for Defense 
Analyses (IDA), and on Friday, November 4, 2005 in the Pentagon, 
Washington, DC.
    The mission of the Committee is to advise the Under Secretary of 
Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics) on technology security, 
combating weapons of mass destruction, chemical and biological defense, 
transformation of the nuclear weapons stockpile, and other matters 
related to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency's mission.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix II), it has been 
determined that this Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly the meeting will be closed to 
the public.

[[Page 51759]]


DATES: Thursday, November 3, 2005, (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) and Friday 
November 4, 2005, (8 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.)

ADDRESSES: Institute for Defense Analyses, Board Room, 4850 Mark Center 
Drive, Alexandria, Virginia and the USD (AT&L) Conference Room 
(3D1019), the Pentagon, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Lieutenant Colonel Don Culp, 
USAF, Defense Threat Reduction Agency/AST, 8725 John J. Kingman Road MS 
6201, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6201. Phone: (703) 767-5717.

    Dated: August 25, 2005.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 05-17315 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M