alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of New NRG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:  1. The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Arthur De Joya Arthur De Joya, Chief Financial Officer  Date: October 5, 2007    {A0041356.DOC}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR TANISYS TECHNOLOGY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE SECOND QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,560,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,655,535
<ALLOWANCES>                                   332,648
<INVENTORY>                                  3,006,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,084,534
<PP&E>                                       5,409,179
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,974,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,247,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,028,472
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,075,679
<PREFERRED>                                  2,075,679
<COMMON>                                    31,412,397
<OTHER-SE>                                (32,021,254)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,247,727
<SALES>                                     27,439,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,439,473
<CGS>                                       22,799,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,799,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,770,237
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               332,648
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             622,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,687,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,687,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,687,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
IN RE R.B.

No. COA06-1296.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Wayne (04JA244, 04JA245).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; Reversed and remanded in part.
11.1 STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

     In February 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share." This
statement requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share on
the face of the income statement. Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and
is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted
into common stock. SFAS No. 128 is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 1997, and accordingly, has been adopted by the Company as of
December 31, 1997.

     Calculation of basic and diluted net income per common share for the year
ended December 31, 1996, is on a pro forma basis based upon operations for the
period, assuming the incorporation, spin-off and the issuance of the common
stock all took place on January 1, 1996. For the period ended December 31, 1997,
the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the calculation of diluted
net income per common share includes 604,000 potentially dilutive shares from
employee stock options outstanding. The Company uses the treasury stock method
to calculate the potential dilution of employee stock options. For the years
ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, net income available to common stockholders
was not affected by the Company's potentially dilutive securities.

     Comparative net income per common share data have been restated for prior
periods. In connection therewith, common stock and options issued within one
year prior to the original filing of the Company's Offering at prices below the
Offering price, which had previously been considered outstanding for all periods
presented, have been reflected in the computations of basic and diluted net
income per common share in accordance with SFAS No. 128 and Securities and
Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 98, issued February 3, 1998.
Such common stock and options have been treated as outstanding only since
issuance.

     Options to purchase 364,247 and 76,667 shares of common stock at $5.10 and
$5.00, respectively, were outstanding during the second half of 1997 but were
not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because
the options' exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the
common shares. The options were still outstanding at December 31, 1997.


                                       42
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 117/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 117/2013 of 8 February 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 117/2013                     

# of 8 February 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
OAKES v. LINCOLN COUNTY BD. OF ELECTIONS.

No. COA06-1699.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Lincoln (06CVS838).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENITIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-23-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-25-1998
<CASH>                                          43,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                       876
<INVENTORY>                                  1,152,652
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,313,678
<PP&E>                                         515,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                 197,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,993,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          728,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       866,827
<OTHER-SE>                                     320,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,993,179
<SALES>                                      1,935,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,935,544
<CGS>                                        1,484,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,484,867
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,699
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements,
(Form S-8, No. 333-33051) pertaining to Primex Technologies, Inc. Retirement
Investment Management Experience Plan; (Form S-8, No. 333-18297) pertaining to
Primex Technologies, Inc. Stock Plan for Non-employees Directors; (Form S-8, No.
333-57857) pertaining to 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan of Primex Technologies,
Inc., of our report dated January 31, 2000, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Primex Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tampa, Florida
March 13, 2000
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7393

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANGELO MARQUIS DRAPER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. ( 2:12

- cr - 00090

- RGD

- DEM

- 2 ; 2:15

- cv - 00503

- RGD )

Submitted : May 27, 2021 Decided: June 17, 2021

Before KING, KEENAN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Angelo Marquis Draper , Appellan t Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Angelo Marquis Draper appeals the district court’ s order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissing it without prejudice as successive

. * W e have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Draper , Nos. 2:12

- cr 00090

- RGD

- DEM

- 2 , 2:15

- cv - 00503

- RGD (E.D. Va. July 14, 2020 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* Draper also appealed the district court’s dismissal of his motion to reconsider for lack of jurisdiction. However, he abandoned any claims relative to that order by failing to raise them in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).
THOMPSON v. LEE COUNTY.

No. COA05-1578.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Lee (98CVS371)

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>






<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,127,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,548,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,189,000
<PP&E>                                     407,088,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,379,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             459,576,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      316,716,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       260,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 130,896,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               459,576,000
<SALES>                                     30,853,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,853,000
<CGS>                                        3,191,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,178,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,470,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,696,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (21,337,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   144,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (21,481,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (21,481,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.82)











</TABLE>
SNIPES v. WARREN.

No. COA06-1590.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Haywood (04CVS803).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARAY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF EAST TEXAS FINANCIAL  SERVICES,  INC., AT
MARCH 31, 1998,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         910,924
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,190,911
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               755,226
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  8,979,785
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      39,323,812
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        39,752,908
<LOANS>                                     61,429,959
<ALLOWANCE>                                    236,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,942,649
<DEPOSITS>                                  87,907,377
<SHORT-TERM>                                 9,188,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            932,462
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,837,888
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,564
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,064,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             120,942,649
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,356,983
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,595,597
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               131,885
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,084,447
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,229,135
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,412,983
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,671,464
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,371,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                475,848
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     475,848
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   302,099
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.05
<LOANS-NON>                                    143,495
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                321,477
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               272,851
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   36,744
<RECOVERIES>                                         0  
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              236,107
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            65,806
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        170,301
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.3
 FORM A
 APOLLO GROUP, INC.  STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 RECITALS
    NOW, THEREFORE
 Grant of Option
 Option Term
 Limited Transferability
 Dates of Exercise
 Cessation of Service
 1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



Special Acceleration of Option
     Adjustment in Option Shares
 3




---



##### 



Stockholder Rights
 Manner of Exercising Option
          4




---



##### 



Withholding Taxes
 Compliance with Laws and Regulations
 Successors and Assigns
 Notices
 Construction
 Governing Law
 Employment at Will .
 5




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 APOLLO GROUP, INC.BY:TITLE:DATED:, 2008OPTIONEEDATED:, 2008
 6




---



##### 



APPENDIX
  Agreement
 Board
 Cause
 Change in Control
 Class A Common Stock
 Corporation
 Employee
 Code
 Disability
 Exercise Date
 Exercise Price
 Expiration Date
 Fair Market Value
 Grant Date
 Incentive Plan
 A-1




---



##### 



Non-Statutory Option
 Notice of Exercise
 Option Shares
 Optionee
 Parent
 Plan Administrator
 Service
 Stock Exchange
 Subsidiary
 Vesting Schedule
 Withholding Taxes
 A-2
# Political and Security Committee Decision BiH/22/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision BiH/22/2014 of 4 December 2014 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for            the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and repealing Decision BiH/19/2012 (2014/898/CFSP) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision BiH/22/2014                     

# of 4 December 2014

# on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and repealing                        Decision BiH/19/2012                     

# (2014/898/CFSP) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2016/332 of 23 February 2016 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander                                 for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and repealing Decision BiH/22/2014 (BiH/23/2016).