alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 11.4

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

CERTIFICATION FORM  SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Jacques Leduc, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Microcell
Telecommunications Inc., (the Company) certify to the best of my knowledge
that (1) the Companys 20-F Form fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the
information contained in the 20-F Form fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 25, 2003



| | /s/ Jacques Leduc
Jacques Leduc
| | -------------------------------
# Council Decision 2014/853/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/853/CFSP of 8 October 2014 on the signature and on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement            in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Republic of Mali regarding the status of the European            Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/853/CFSP                     

# of 8 October 2014

# on the signature and on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between                        the European Union and the Republic of Mali regarding the status of the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 37 thereof, in conjunction with Article 218(5) and                           (6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)On 15 April 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/219/CFSP(1) on the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali).

(2)Following the adoption of a Decision by the Council on 15 April 2014 authorising the opening of negotiations, the High Representative                              of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, in accordance with Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union, negotiated                              an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Republic of Mali on the status of EUCAP                              Sahel Mali.

(3)The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Republic of Mali regarding the status                     of the CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.                  

The text of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters is attached to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the respective letter in order                     to bind the Union.                  

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 8 October 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

M. Lupi                            

1

Council Decision 2014/219/CFSP of 15 April 2014 on the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (OJ L 113, 16.4.2014, p. 21).
Rebekah Chantay REVELS v. MISS AMERICA ORGANIZATION, Miss North Carolina Pageant Organization, Inc., Alan Clouse, Billy Duncan, Charlene Hay, Doug Huff, Tom Roberts, David Clegg, Beverly Adams, and Candace Russell.

No. 189P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Barry Nakell, for Revels.

G. Grady Richardson, Jr., for Miss America Organization.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 641 S.E.2d 721.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of April 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
Peggy Johnson STURGILL, Administratrix of the Estate of Charlie L. Johnson v. ASHE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC.

No. 583P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Jay Vannoy, Northe Wilkesboro, for Sturgill.

Brenda S. McClearn, Greensboro, for Ashe Memorial Hosp.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 652 S.E.2d 302.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of December 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1

                             Creditrust Corporation

              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We have issued our report dated February 11, 2000, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Creditrust Corporation on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of
Creditrust Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70863) filed with the
Commission on January 20, 1999.

                         /S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
                         ______________________



Vienna, Virginia
February 11, 2000
STATE v. HEARD.

No. COA06-1429.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Wake (05CRS20158, 05CRS20159, 05CRS20160).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      31,700,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              119,800,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 74,000,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           236,900,000
<PP&E>                                      98,000,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              51,100,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             626,300,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      103,300,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       200,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 234,700,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               626,300,000
<SALES>                                    377,900,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           377,900,000
<CGS>                                      220,800,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              398,800,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,200,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,400,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (29,100,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,000,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (37,100,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.12)


</TABLE>
FARLOW v. FARLOW

No. COA07-617

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 19, 2008.

Certification Date March 10, 2008.

Appeal from Guilford (04CVD3115).

Decision without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 31.3





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Paul Kinnon, certify that:



1.	I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of Transgenomic, Inc.; and



2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







|August 21, 2015 | By: | /s/ Paul Kinnon                                                                                                                                 | 
|--------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                |     | Paul KinnonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT
23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 16, 2010,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of PST Eletrônica S.A.
included in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, in the
following Registration Statements:





Registration Number
            
            Description of Registration
      Statement333-149436
            
            Form
      S-8 – Stoneridge, Inc. Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive
      Plan333-127017
            
            Form
      S-8 – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Restricted Shares
Plan333-96953
            
            Form
      S-8 – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Share Option Plan333-72176
            
            Form
      S-8 – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Share Option
  Plan





Campinas,
Brazil


March 16,
2010





ERNST
& YOUNG


Auditores
Independentes S.S.


CRC
2SP015199/O-6-S-AM


/s/ JOSE
ANTONIO DE. A. NAVARRETE


José
Antonio de A. Navarrete


Accountant
CRC1SP198698/O-4-S-AM
Joseph T. WALSH v. TOWN OF WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH BOARD OF ALDERMAN ACTING As A Board of Adjustment, Charles W. Smith, III, and wife, Constance C. Smith.

No. 467P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

J. Wesley Casteen, Clinton, for Walsh.

Michael C. Murchison, Wilmington, for Charles & Constance Smith.

John C. Wessell, III, Wilmington, for Town of Wrightsville Beach.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of December 2007 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Covad Communications Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan Crawford, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. COVAD COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.By:
    /s/ SUSAN CRAWFORDSusan CrawfordDate: March 14, 2005
    
    Senior Vice President and
Acting Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA07-1208.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Halifax (06CRS55679, 06CRS55680).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
IN RE R.W.

No. COA06-706.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Wilkes (98J56, 98J57).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. SANCHEZ.

No. COA07-21.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (05CRS58338, 05CRS58339, 05CRS58340).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C.  20549


                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT

                      Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                                Date of Report
                               January 16, 1997


                               CKF BANCORP, INC.
                               -----------------
            (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)


       Delaware                      0-25180                  61-01267810
----------------------------  -----------------------  -------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction      (SEC File No.)        (IRS Employer ID
       of Incorporation)                                     Number)


340 West Main Street, Danville, Kentucky                         40422
-----------------------------------------                       ----------
(Address of principal executive offices)                        (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (606) 236-4181
                                                   -----------------


                                Not Applicable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last Report)


<PAGE>
 
                               CKF BANCORP, INC.

                     INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN REPORT


Item 5.   Other Events 
----------------------

The Registrant announced that on January 14, 1997, the Board of Directors 
declared a cash dividend of $.22 per share to all shareholders of record on 
January 28, 1997 payable on February 10, 1997.

The Board also declared a special dividend of $1.00 per share to all 
shareholders of record on January 29, 1997, payable on February 11, 1997.

For further details, reference is made to the press Release dated January 16, 
1997, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99 and incorporated herein by 
reference.


Item 7, Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial information and Exhibits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exhibit 99 -- Press Release dated January 16, 1997
----------
<PAGE>
 
                                  SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the 
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                          CKF BANCORP, INC.



Dated:  January 16, 1997                  By: /s/ John H. Stigall
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                  John H. Stigall
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EOP Operating Limited Partnership
Statement of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands)
 For the years ended December 31,2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Income before income taxes, allocation to minority interests, income from
investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and gain on sales of real estate
    
    $
    99,050
    
    
    $
    205,598
    
    
    $
    340,463
    
    
    $
    440,863
    
    
    $
    342,072Plus Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    819,868
    
    
    
    833,393
    
    
    
    806,812
    
    
    
    795,179
    
    
    
    710,327Capitalized interest
    
    
    441
    
    
    
    4,648
    
    
    
    10,089
    
    
    
    21,447
    
    
    
    25,871Loan amortization cost
    
    
    11,857
    
    
    
    15,284
    
    
    
    6,492
    
    
    
    4,422
    
    
    
    14,622Fixed charges
    
    
    832,166
    
    
    
    853,325
    
    
    
    823,393
    
    
    
    821,048
    
    
    
    750,820Plus amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    1,764
    
    
    
    1,790
    
    
    
    1,490
    
    
    
    1,345
    
    
    
    1,165Plus distributed income of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
    
    
    52,690
    
    
    
    66,829
    
    
    
    87,268
    
    
    
    129,753
    
    
    
    82,409Less capitalized interest
    
    
    (441
    )
    
    
    (4,648
    )
    
    
    (10,089
    )
    
    
    (21,447
    )
    
    
    (25,871
    )Less minority interest in pretax income of subsidiaries that have not incurred
fixed charges
    
    
    (2,263
    )
    
    
    (2,070
    )
    
    
    (2,217
    )
    
    
    (2,345
    )
    
    
    (2,333
    )Total
    
    
    51,750
    
    
    
    61,901
    
    
    
    76,452
    
    
    
    107,306
    
    
    
    55,370Earnings
    
    $
    982,966
    
    
    $
    1,120,824
    
    
    $
    1,240,308
    
    
    $
    1,369,217
    
    
    $
    1,148,262Fixed charges
    
    $
    832,166
    
    
    $
    853,325
    
    
    $
    823,393
    
    
    $
    821,048
    
    
    $
    750,820Earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.7
    
    
    
    1.5
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of
AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the fiscal year
endedDecember 31,
2008as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William G. LaPerch,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:March 13, 2009
              By:
              /s/ William G.
      LaPerchWilliam G.
      LaPerch
                Chief Executive
      Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1895

REI-JEU CHANG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES S. MAXWELL; DANIEL S. WILLARD; YUE TIAN;

FLOYD WILLIS, Temporary Trustee,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 00-1900

RICHARD CHANG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES S. MAXWELL; YUE TIAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA00-740-PJM, CA-00-495-PJM)

Submitted: August 28, 2001 Decided: October 1, 2001
2

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ning Ye, HEMENWAY & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C.; John D. Hemenway,

Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Brian M. Barke, MAXWELL & CO.,

L.L.C., Rockville, Maryland; Edward J. Hutchins, Jr., Stacey A.

Moffet, ECCLESTON & WOLF, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In appeal No. 00-1895, Rei-Jeu Chang appeals from the district

court’s order abstaining from exercising jurisdiction under the

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a) (1994), to address

Rei-Jeu’s claim of ownership of the stock of Erie Trade Inc. In

appeal No. 00-1900, Richard Chang appeals from the district court’s

orders (1) dismissing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) his complaint

alleging that Yue Tian and James Maxwell engaged in conduct intended to inflict emotional distress upon him, and (2) denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the briefs, the joint

appendices, and the district court’s opinions and find no abuse of

discretion and no reversible error. See Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.,

515 U.S. 277, 286-87 (1995) (holding that district court has broad

discretion to abstain from exercising jurisdiction under §

2201(a)); Harris v. Jones, 380 A.2d 611, 613 (Md. 1977) (setting

forth elements of cause of action for intentional infliction of

emotional distress).

Accordingly, we affirm in both of these appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Chang v. Maxwell, No. CA-00-740-PJM

(D. Md. filed June 22, 2000; entered June 23, 2000), and Chang v.

Maxwell, No. CA-00-495-PJM (D. Md. filed Apr. 25, 2000; entered

Apr. 26, 2000 & filed June 1, 2000; entered June 2, 2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
4

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-23-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-25-1998
<CASH>                                          44,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                       796
<INVENTORY>                                  1,113,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,253,646
<PP&E>                                         496,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                 183,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,931,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          672,446
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       864,186
<OTHER-SE>                                     317,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,931,361
<SALES>                                      1,061,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,061,074
<CGS>                                          818,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  818,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,164
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,090
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,074
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,074
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
IN RE J.M.

No. COA07-1056.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Cumberland (04JT522).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.