alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1068/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1068/2014 of 9 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for tusk in Union and international            waters of I, II and XIV by vessels flying the flag of United Kingdom         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1068/2014                     

# of 9 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for tusk in Union and international waters of I, II and XIV by vessels flying the flag                        of United Kingdom                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2), lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
Order entered March 2, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00087-CV

IN RE DAVID BARNES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-11126

ORDER

Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for 

writ of mandamus, and deny the motion for temporary relief as moot.

/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS

JUSTICE
OWENS v. OWENS.

No. COA07-230.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Rowan (00CVD3118).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
    CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL MATURO, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, TREASURER AND
          CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP.,
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of Reckson Associates Realty Corp. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

   1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
       ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
       of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
       U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

   2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Dated: May 7, 2004

                           By       /s/ Michael Maturo
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Michael Maturo, Executive Vice President,
                                    Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reckson Associates Realty Corp. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3559 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure that third party review 

is available whenever health insurance coverage in the individual market 

is terminated. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure that 

third party review is available whenever health insurance 

coverage in the individual market is terminated. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Continuing Coverage 

5 Act of 2008’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 3559 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 

2 ACT. 

3 Subpart 2 of part B of title XXVII of the Public 

4 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–51 et seq.) is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 2754. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW IN THE CASE OF TERMI7 NATION. 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A health insurance issuer offer9 ing health insurance coverage in the individual market 

10 shall ensure that, with respect to an enrollee, independent, 

11 third-party review is provided through an appropriate enti12 ty where the issuer seeks to discontinue the health insur13 ance coverage of such enrollee. The cost of such a review 

14 shall be paid by the issuer. 

15 ‘‘(b) NOTICE.—Not later than 30 days prior to the 

16 date on which a health insurance issuer discontinues 

17 health insurance coverage for an enrollee, the issuer shall 

18 provide such enrollee with notice of the discontinuance. 

19 Such notice shall contain a statement of the enrollees right 

20 to an external review as required under subsection (a). 

21 ‘‘(c) SUBMISSION OF REVIEW TO INSURANCE COM22 MISSIONER.—Upon completion of an external review pro23 vided for under this section, the determination with re24 spect to the review shall be submitted to the insurance 

25 commissioner for the State involved. Such commissioner 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•S 3559 IS

1 may approve the determination, overturn the determina2 tion, or require an additional independent review. 

3 ‘‘(d) PREEMPTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

4 construed to preempt State laws that provide greater pro5 tections to enrollees than the protections provided by this 

6 section.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference call of the Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi Advisory Committees will convene at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at 3:30 p.m. (CST) on Tuesday, August 30, 2005. The purpose of the conference call is to discuss and plan future activities in FY 2005-06. 

This conference call is available to the public through the following call-in number: 1-800-473-8492, access code number 43412191. Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and access code. 

To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting Corrine Sanders of the Central Regional Office 913-551-1400 (TDD 913-551-1414), by 2 p.m. on Friday, August 26, 2005. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, August 29, 2005. 

Ivy L. Davis, 

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. 05-17411 Filed 8-31-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
MOORE v. FIRST CITIZENS BANK.

No. COA07-616.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 15, 2008.

Certification Date May 5, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 352436).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Council Decision of 11 February 2014 amending Decision 2009/1014/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee            of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015 (2014/83/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 11 February 2014

# amending Decision 2009/1014/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period                        from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015                     

# (2014/83/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the request of the Spanish Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009, the Council adopted Decision 2009/1014/EU(1) appointing, in particular, the Spanish members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25                              January 2015.

(2)Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO has been a member of the Committee of the Regions as from 26 January 2010 and was appointed as                              President of the Autonomous Community of the Region of Murcia in accordance with the proposal of the Kingdom of Spain(2).

(3)By letter of 8 January 2014, the Spanish Permanent Representation informed the Council that Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO is                              an elected member of the Regional Assembly of the Region of Murcia in addition to being President of the Autonomous Community                              of the Region of Murcia and that the Spanish authorities requested that Decision 2009/1014/EU be amended accordingly.

(4)Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO held both these mandates at the time of the adoption of Decision 2009/1014/EU.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

In Annex I of Decision 2009/1014/EU, the entry concerning D. Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO is hereby replaced as follows:

‘D. Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO                  

*Presidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia y Diputado de la Asamblea Regional de Murcia*.’                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

E. Venizelos                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

Letter of 3 December 2009.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth J.A. KRASOVIC.

No. 6P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina, Twelfth District.

March 8, 2007.

Kenneth J.A. Krasovic, Pro Se.

Latoya B. Powell, Associate Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 4th day of January 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION 

350 Legget Drive 
 Kanata, Ontario

 Canada K2K 2W7 
 July 7,
2016 
 BY EMAIL 
 Polycom, Inc. 

6001 America Center Drive 
 San Jose, California 95002 

Attention: Sayed M. Darwish 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is made to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 15, 2016 and as thereafter amended (the “Merger
Agreement”), by and among Polycom, Inc. (the “Company”), Mitel Networks Corporation (“Parent”) and Meteor Two, LLC. Further reference is made to the letter from the Company to Parent, dated July 7,
2016, regarding the Company Acquisition Proposal received from Siris Capital Group, LLC, which the Company Board has determined is a Company Superior Proposal. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the respective meanings
ascribed thereto in the Merger Agreement. 
 Parent hereby waives the “matching period” set forth in Section 5.02(b) of the
Merger Agreement. Please indicate that the Company will terminate the Merger Agreement pursuant to Section 9.01(h) thereof (the “Termination”) by returning a signed copy of this letter and paying the Company Termination Fee in
immediately available funds to Parent’s account set forth on Annex A hereto. The Termination shall be automatically effective upon receipt by Parent of the Company Termination Fee. 

[Signature page follows] 







 Please indicate your acceptance and agreement of the foregoing by signing where indicated below
and returning a signed copy of this letter to Mitel pursuant to Section 10.05 of the Merger Agreement. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,
  

MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION

		
	By:	 	/s/ Greg Hiscock
		 	 Greg Hiscock
 Vice President, General
Counsel &
 Corporate Secretary



 Accepted and Agreed as of 

the date first written above: 
 POLYCOM, INC. 

 

			
		
	By:	 	/s/ Laura J. Durr
		 	 Name: Laura J. Durr
 Title:   Chief
Financial Officer
             & Executive Vice President


  

	cc:	Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. 

 One Market Plaza 

Spear Tower, Suite 3300 
 San
Francisco, CA 94105 
 Attention: Michael S. Ringler 

Email: mringler@wsgr.com 

Morrison & Foerster LLP 

425 Market Street 
 San Francisco,
CA 94105 
 Attention: Robert S. Townsend 

Email: rtownsend@mofo.com 
 Paul,
Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 
 1285 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10019 
 Attention:
Adam M. Givertz 
 Email: agivertz@paulweiss.com 

  
 2
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3605 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain 

criminal history background checks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

S 3605 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal History 

3 Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

5 Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 5119a note) is amended by striking ‘‘a 66-month’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘a 78-month’’. 

Passed the Senate September 26 (legislative day, 

September 17), 2008. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Rhett R. Atkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of Eden Bioscience
Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eden Bioscience
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  November 1, 2006


                                           /s/ Rhett R. Atkins
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Rhett R. Atkins
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                     - 26 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULE 1 91

AND REVISING THE COMMENT

TO RULE 140 OF THE

PENNSYLVANIA

RULES OF JUVENILE COURT

PROCEDURE :

:

:

:

:

:

:

: NO. 766

SUPREME COURT RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4 th day of May , 201 8 , upon the recommendation of the Juvenile

Court Procedural Rules Committee

, the proposal having been published for public

comment at 47 Pa.B. 7010 (November 18, 2017) :

I t is O rdered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania

tha t Pen nsylvania Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 191 is amended and the Comment

to Pennsylvania Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 140 is revised in the attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall

be effective on July 1

, 201 8

.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
#### Freda Rader, Respondent, v Jim Walton et al., Appellants.

[802 NYS2d 818]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered January 14, 2004 in a personal injury action. The order denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when he slipped on ice in front of a building owned by defendant Downtown Building Group, Inc. (Downtown Building Group). Defendant Jim Walton was the *1410president of Downtown Building Group. We agree with defendants that Supreme Court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. “To hold an abutting landowner liable to a pedestrian injured by a defect in a public sidewalk, the landowner must have either created the defect, caused it to occur by a special use, or breached a specific ordinance or statute which obligates the [land] owner to maintain the sidewalk” *(Jeanty v Benin,*1 AD3d 566, 567 [2003]; *see Bloch v Potter,*204 AD2d 672 [1994]). Here, plaintiff contends that defendants created the allegedly defective condition because water running off the building froze on the sidewalk. An abutting landowner is liable, however, only if, “by artificial means, snow and ice are transferred from the abutting premises to the sidewalk; or if, by such artificial means, water from the property is permitted to flow onto the public sidewalk where it freezes” *(Roark v Hunting,*24 NY2d 470, 475 [1969]). Here, defendants established that the water did not flow onto the sidewalk by artificial means, and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). The further contention of plaintiff that defendants are liable because they breached a provision of the Code of the City of Jamestown (Code) obligating them to maintain the sidewalk also is lacking in merit. Section 252-14 (B) of the Code, the provision on which plaintiff relies for the proposition that defendants were required to remove snow and ice from the abutting sidewalk, does not contain the requisite additional language “that if the landowner breaches such duty he will be liable to those who are injured for any defects in the sidewalk” *(Kiernan v Thompson,*137 AD2d 957, 958 [1988]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.