alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Form 10-Q Table of Contents

Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of EDEN Bioscience Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rhett
R. Atkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 6, 2003

| |  |  |                                                                        
| |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | /s/ Rhett R. AtkinsRhett R. AtkinsPresident and Chief Executive Officer

---
Exhibit
10.76





SUMMARY OF 2009 BONUS PLAN




On
February 12, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
AboveNet, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), approved the Company’s
2009 Bonus Plan (the “2009 Bonus Plan”).  The 2009 Bonus Plan
provides for the creation of an employee bonus pool based on the achievement in
2009 of certain adjusted U.S. EBITDA (domestic net earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted for certain non-recurring,
non-operational and non-cash items) targets established by the Compensation
Committee.  Bonus payments to employees from the bonus pool are generally
discretionary except that in accordance with their employment
agreements, each of the President and Chief Executive Officer William
LaPerch, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Joseph
Ciavarella, the Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer Rajiv Datta,
the Senior Vice President for Operations Douglas Jendras and the Senior Vice
President and General Counsel Robert Sokota is entitled to a bonus equal to
thirty five percent (35%) of his respective base salary upon the achievement of
the adjusted U.S. EBITDA target set by the Compensation Committee.  In
addition, the Senior Vice President of Sales John Jacquay is entitled to a bonus
of $250,000 upon the achievement of such adjusted U.S. EBITDA target.  If
the target threshold established for the bonus payments to these six officers is
not achieved, no bonus payments are required to be made to these
officers.





Additionally,
no bonus payment is payable to any domestic employee without the
authorization and final approval by the Compensation Committee.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

## **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statement on form S-8 (No. 333-112683) of Centiv,Inc. (the “Company”) of our report dated January 31, 2003, except for Note 9,for which the date was March 31, 2003, (as included in Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2002) relating to the financial statements which appears inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

 

Grant Thornton LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois,

April 28, 2004

 

----
STATE v. PERKINS.

No. COA07-506.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS60931).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the financial statements contained in the registrant's quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               953,056
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      7,713,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                          294,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   9,965,610
<PP&E>                                            24,079,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    42,336,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             16,531,258
<BONDS>                                            5,984,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              15,114
<OTHER-SE>                                        19,806,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      42,336,875
<SALES>                                            9,719,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   9,719,418
<CGS>                                              7,182,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      7,182,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   2,295,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      241,643
<INCOME-TAX>                                          65,244
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  176,399
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         176,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of Community Investors Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB for
the period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                          /s/Phillip W. Gerber
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Name:  Phillip W. Gerber
                                          Title: President and Chief
                                                 Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community Investors Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by
Community Investors Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Eric Marshall HAMMETT.

No. 83P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Daniel Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hammett.

*228Kelly L. Sandling, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 642 S.E.2d 454.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 20th day of April 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

HUDSON, J., recused.
##### 



EXHIBIT 15.2

AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

November 12 , 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated
November 10, 2003 on our review of interim
financial information of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International
(formerly ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) (the
Company) for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2003 and 2002 and included in the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 is incorporated by reference in
its Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-56971, 333-81383,
333-73098, 333-85572, 333-109877 and 333-109879) and on Form S-3 (File No.
333-10661, 333-67376, 333-88040 and 333-88042).

Very truly yours,



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
EXHIBIT 10.2

                                                    October 19, 1998

Mr. Jack Smith

Dear Jack:

         This letter will confirm our understanding concerning the termination
of your employment with The Sports Authority, Inc. (the "Company"). Reference is
made to the employment agreement dated as of August 29, 1996 between you and the
Company (the "Employment Agreement") and to the restricted stock agreement dated
as of March 28, 1996 between you and the Company (the "Restricted Stock
Agreement").

         1. Your employment was terminated by the Company on September 15, 1998,
entitling you to the benefits described in Section 2 of the Employment
Agreement.

         2. The restricted stock granted to you under the Restricted Stock
Agreement includes the following shares which have not yet vested: 16,687 shares
scheduled to vest on June 21, 1999 and 16,688 shares scheduled to vest on June
21, 2000. The Compensation Committee of the Board has determined pursuant to
Section 6(c)(iii) of the 1996 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan that,
notwithstanding the terms of the Restricted Stock Agreement, such unvested
shares shall not be forfeited due to the termination of your employment. Such
unvested shares shall vest on the dates set forth above and shall be forfeited
prior to the applicable date only if the Compensation Committee shall determine,
in its sole discretion, that you have not fulfilled your obligations under the
Employment Agreement.

         3. The Company agrees to pay the reasonable expenses of leasing and
operating an office until June 30, 2000 to enable you to discharge your duties
as Chairman of the Board.

         4. Except as modified by this agreement, the Employment Agreement and
the Restricted Stock Agreement are ratified and confirmed in all respects.

                                                     Sincerely,

                                                     THE SPORTS AUTHORITY, INC.

                                                     By  /S/ MARTIN E. HANAKA
                                                        ----------------------

         Agreed:

         /S/ JACK A. SMITH
         ---------------------
Jerry A. HAILEY, Jr., d/b/a Hailey Properties v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 227P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

L. Lamar Armstrong, Jr., Smithfield, Michele A. Ledo, for Hailey Properties.

O. Craig Tierney, Jr., for Insurance Company.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 640 S.E.2d 849.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of May 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
STATE of North Carolina v. Antonio Ramille RYALS.

No. 593P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Kathryne L. VandenBerg, Raleigh, for Ryals.

Robert J. Blum, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: 179 N.C.App. 733, 635 S.E.2d 470.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of November 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0000929697
<NAME>                       THE GENERAL CHEMICAL GROUP INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<CASH>                                         1,249
<SECURITIES>                                       0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                 61,432  
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,666  
<INVENTORY>                                   22,571  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              91,957  
<PP&E>                                       286,036  
<DEPRECIATION>                               144,136  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               250,544  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         54,105  
<BONDS>                                            0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0  
<PREFERRED>                                        0  
<COMMON>                                         224  
<OTHER-SE>                                    67,296  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 250,544  
<SALES>                                       61,472  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              61,472  
<CGS>                                         51,268  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 51,268  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,669  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,309  
<INCOME-TAX>                                     330  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              979  
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0  
<CHANGES>                                          0  
<NET-INCOME>                                     979  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .05  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .05  
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



           FLORSHEIM GROUP INC.                           EXHIBIT 11

     STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           Three Months        Three Months
                                               Ended               Ended
                                         September 28, 1996  September 27, 1997
                                         ------------------  ------------------
<S>                                           <C>                 <C>
Weighted average common shares during 
the period                                    8,346,051           8,374,751

Common shares issuable on exercise of 
stock options                                    44,160 (2)                 (1)
                                              ---------           ---------
Weighted average common and common 
equivalent shares outstanding                 8,390,211           8,374,751
                                              =========           =========
</TABLE>

(1)  Common stock options were not included since the exercise of which would 
     have had an antidilutive effect on the net loss per share.

(2)  Includes common stock options, the exercise of which would result in 
     dilution of net earnings per share.  If the average common stock price 
     was higher than the common stock option exercise price during the period, 
     common stock options were considered as exercised and the proceeds 
     assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average common stock 
     market price.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Nine Months          Nine Months
                                               Ended               Ended
                                         September 28, 1996  September 27, 1997
                                         ------------------  ------------------
<S>                                           <C>                 <C>
Weighted average common shares during 
the period                                    8,346,051           8,374,751
                                              
Common shares issuable on exercise of 
stock options                                     -     (1)           -     (1)
                                              ---------           ---------
Weighted average common and common            
equivalent shares outstanding                 8,346,051           8,374,751
                                              =========           =========
</TABLE>


   (1)  Common stock options were not included since the exercise of which
        would have had an antidilutive effect on the net loss per share.




                                     23
STATE v. HALL.

No. COA07-724.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 6, 2008.

Certification Date May 27, 2008.

Appeal from Burke (05CRS7268, 05CRS7269).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 401/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 401/2014 of 22 April 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 401/2014                     

# of 22 April 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 April 2014.

*For the Commission*,                           

*On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
In the Matter of J.J., J.J., J.J., Minor Children. appealed by Mother.

No. 15A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Katharine Chester, for Faye J.

Jill Sanchez, for Gaston County DSS.

Laura Crawford, for Perry Bobbin.

Ed Bogle, for Guardian Ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Mother) on the 29th day of January 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari in lieu of Petition for Discretionary Review to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Mother) on the 7th day of March 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Justice HUDSON recused.