alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In re C.D.A.W., a Minor Child. appealed by Respondent Mother.

No. 110A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Gary C. Rhodes, Salisbury, for Angela Wright Eagle.

James A. Dickens, Assistant Guilford County Attorney, for Guilford County DSS.

Joyce Terres, Attorney Advocate, for Guardian ad Litem.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 625 S.E.2d 139.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th day of March 2006 by Guilford County Department of Social Services in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. John David CAMPBELL.

No. 487P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Leonard G. Green, Assistant Attorney. General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Charlotte Gail Blake, Boone, for Campbell.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by the State of NC on the 4th day of. October 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th day of October 2007 by the State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuait to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Wayne SPEIGHT.

No. 491PA04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 20, 2006.

Patricia A. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Margaret Creasy Ciardella, Hampstead, for Speight.

Defendant's Motion to File Supplemental Response on the Question of Special Verdicts is allowed. The Attorney General shall have seven days from the date of this Order to file a response, which shall not exceed five pages in length.

By order of this Court in Conference, this the 20th day of October, 2006.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN T-NETIX, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                             336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                        29
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          45,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                            209
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,239
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,980
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    524
<INCOME-TAX>                                       192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Eugene Tyrone DeCASTRO.

No. 221A93-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 16, 2007.

Barry McNeill, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the fourth motion filed on the 11th day of October 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of October 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          19,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,945
<PP&E>                                         437,902
<DEPRECIATION>                                 295,083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,698
<BONDS>                                        248,675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,048
<COMMON>                                         1,321
<OTHER-SE>                                    (87,452)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,290
<SALES>                                         49,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,205
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,780)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,780)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)


</TABLE>
STATE v. HORTON.

No. COA07-771.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Wilkes (06CRS50757, 06CRS50758, 06CRS1778).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed in part, no error in part.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Stuart A. Rothstein,hereby certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-K of CharterMac;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15)for the registrant and we have:

 

a)     designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure the material information relating to theregistrant, including its onsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures

 

c)     in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors or persons performing the equivalent functions:

 

a)     all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal control which adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control and

 
| Date:  | March  15, 2004 |   | By:                     | /s/  Stuart A. Rothstein |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|-------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |            |   | Stuart  A. Rothstein    |
|   |            |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
STATE v. BAILEY.

No. COA07-1141.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Durham (05CRS46927, 05CRS16295).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code 'SS' 1350

     The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of The General Chemical Group Inc. (the
"Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                      /s/ David S. Graziosi
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      David S. Graziosi
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The General Chemical Group Inc. and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4982]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Degas Sculptures”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Milwaukee Art Museum, from on or about February 19, 2005, until on or about June 5, 2005, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Richard Lahne, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-453-8058). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: January 21, 2005.

C. Miller Crouch,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 05-1741 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1298/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1298/2014 of 5 December 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1298/2014                     

# of 5 December 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40336

c/w No. 11-40339

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS VILLASANA-LUEVANOS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:10-CR-1257-1

USDC No. 1:07-CR-1203-1

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis VillasanaLuevanos (Villasana) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.

Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villasana has not filed a response. We

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 19, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 11-40336

c/w No. 11-40339

2

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the consolidated appeals

present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION


 To my knowledge,  this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30,
2004 (the  "Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
this Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition
and results of operations of CKF Bancorp, Inc.



                                  By: /s/ John H. Stigall
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      John H. Stigall
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                                  By: /s/ Russell M. Brooks
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Russell M. Brooks
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Date:    November 12, 2004
STATE v. LEACH.

No. COA07-411.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS23009, 05CRS23010).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. GLOVER.

No. COA05-588.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Cumberland (04CRS55044).

Case without published opinion. No error.
In the Matter of S.W. appealed by Phyllis W.

No. 101P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Peter Wood, for Phyllis W.

*60Cathy L. Moore, Assistant County Attorney, for Durham County DSS.

Wendy Sotolongo, Durham, for Guardian Ad Litem.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 625 S.E.2d 594.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of February 2006 by Respondent (Phyllis W.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
STATE v. RICE

No. COA06-882

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from Alamance (03CRS56604).

Cases reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jimmie D. SHARPE, Jr.

No. 295P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Christy E. Wilhelm, for Sharpe.

Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th day of June 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929454
<NAME>                        GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                          42,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,634
<PP&E>                                         203,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                         163
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,442
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,737
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,570
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,594
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,594
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (231)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,363
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.23
        


</TABLE>