alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U-Vend, Inc. 8-K



Exhibit
10.46


June 30, 2016


Mr. Mark Chapman


President


U-Vend America, Inc.


1507 7th Street, #425


Santa Monica, CA 90401


Dear Mr. Chapman:


As of June 30, 2016, the balance
of funds owed to you through earned payroll and associated benefits, as specified in your employment agreement, totaled approximately
$50,000. On that date, you had requested repayment of $30,000 of the outstanding balance in newly issued common stock of the Company,
which the Company’s Board of Directors unanimously approved.  You and the Company agreed to the following terms
regarding this debt to equity conversion:


	 	1.	Amount converted: $30,000
	 	2.	Conversion share price: $0.17
	 	3.	Shares delivered: 176,471
	 	4.	Approximate remaining balance of debt owed you:  $20,000


By signing below you are signifying
your acceptance of the above listed terms of conversion.


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	/s/ Raymond Meyers
	 	 
	 	Raymond Meyers
	 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	U-Vend, Inc.


Accepted:


/s/ Mark Chapman


Mark Chapman
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet of MidAmerican  Energy Company as of March 31, 1996,
and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the three
months  ended March 31,  1996,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                         0000928576
<NAME>                        MidAmerican Energy Company
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,636,140
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    395,412
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         254,371
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       404,908
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 210,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,901,482
<COMMON>                                       797,675
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            451,414
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1,244,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          50,000
<PREFERRED>                                    81,461
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,109,563
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 99,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  917
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,315,491
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3,901,482
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      458,260
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           32,330
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     356,569
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     388,899
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        69,361
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             5,876<F1>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 75,237
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       21,713
<NET-INCOME>                                   53,524
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    2,477
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  51,047
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       30,221
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      19,826
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         151,531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Tag 41  includes a  $6,105,000  income from  Discontinued  Operations,  net of
income taxes.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Laurie A. Bebo, Chief Executive Officer of Assisted Living Concepts, Inc., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.(“Registrant”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations, and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                    /s/ Laurie A. Bebo   Laurie A. Bebo   Chief Executive Officer May 11, 2007
STATE of North Carolina v. James Dymott KEY.

No. 251P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

James Key, pro se.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of May 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Assisted Living Concepts,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Matthew Patrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Matthew G. Patrick

Matthew G. Patrick
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2003
STATE of North Carolina v. Jerry Wayne CONNER.

No. 219A91-6.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Kenneth J. Rose, Durham, Mark Kleinschmidt, for Conner.

Steven M. Arbogast, Special Deputy Attorney General, Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 16th day of February 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Gates County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
# Council Decision of 8 September 2014 appointing a Spanish members and a Spanish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions            (2014/654/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 8 September 2014

# appointing a Spanish members and a Spanish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/654/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Spanish Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015. On 3 October 2011, by Council Decision 2011/661/EU(3), Ms Carmen María SANDOVAL SÁNCHEZ was appointed as alternate member until 25 January 2015.

(2)A member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Ramón Luis VALCÁRCEL SISO. An alternate member's                              seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Carmen María SANDOVAL SÁNCHEZ.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The followingare hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs                     until 25 January 2015:                  

as member:
                -  Mr Alberto GARRE LÓPEZ, *Presidente de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia*                                   

and

as alternate member:
                -  Mr Manuel PLEQUEZUELO ALONSO, *Director-General de Participación Ciudadana, Unión Europea y Acción Exterior de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia*.                                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.                           

3

OJ L 263, 7.10.2011, p. 18.
Exhibit
      32.2








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection
      with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Jackson,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





By:
            /s/
                David A. JacksonChief
                Financial OfficerAugust
                8, 2006








*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight
      Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.*




Back
      to Form
      10-Q
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 164 (Thursday, August 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16937]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5174]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Assorted Egyptian Treasures for Public Exhibition''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 2, 2005, notice was published on page 32392 of the 
Federal Register (volume 70, number 105) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibitions ``Mummy: the inside 
story'' and ``Treasures of Ancient Art from the British Museum.'' The 
referenced notice is corrected as to additional objects to be included 
in the the exhibition ``Mummy: the inside story.'' Notice is hereby 
given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested 
in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), 
Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 
note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, 
Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and 
Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I 
hereby determine that the additional objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Mummy: the inside story'', imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The additional objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the additional exhibit objects at the Houston 
Museum of Natural Science, Houston, TX, from on or about September 30, 
2005, until on or about February 12, 2006 (with one object remaining 
for longer-term exhibit), at the Gulf Coast Exploreum, Mobile, AL, from 
on or about March 8, 2006, until on or about August 4, 2006, and at 
possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Richard Lahne, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
453-8058). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: August 19, 2005.
Travis Horel,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-16937 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
IN RE D.C.B.

COA06-1142.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 15, 2007.

Certification Date June 4, 2007.

Appeal from Wayne (04JA151, 04JA152).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DERRICK DEWON THOMAS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-2985

[January 31, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15007763CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Born-Suniaga, 219 So. 3d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order filed June 26, 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00253

- CV

____________ WRIGHT W . GORE J R

. , Appellant

V. PACIFIC WESTERN EQUI PMENT FINANCE, ET AL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 93938

- CV



### O R D E R This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 5, 2018. The notice of appeal was due April 4, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, howeve r, filed
the notice of appeal on April 5, 2018, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner
, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is stillobligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing.

See Mi ller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; 10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
IN RE R.G.J.

No. COA07-817.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Harnett (05J208).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7334

JOHN ALBERT WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RICKY HARRISON, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Attorney General of the State of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-01-2085)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 23, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Albert Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John Albert Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

granting the Respondents’ motion for summary judgment on his

petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be

taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus

proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district

court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of

a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). As to

claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds,

a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner

can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial

of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its

procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.

2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert.

denied, 122 S. Ct. 318 (2001). We have reviewed the record and

conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Williams

has not satisfied either standard. See Williams v. Harrison, No.

CA-01-2085 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 1, 2002 & entered Aug. 2, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
3

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit








	
				
	 
	 
	 
	Exhibit 10.1

	BB&T Corporation
Modification of 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Performance Award - Summary
On June 28, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of BB&T Corporation (“BB&T” or the “Company”) approved the following change to the Company’s 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Performance Awards (“LTIP”) originally granted on February 23, 2016: 
Payments under the LTIP are subject to reduction based on BB&T’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) percentile performance relative to the Company’s peer group TSR for the performance period.  TSR will be calculated based on the stock price appreciation during the performance period plus the value of dividends paid on such stock during the performance period (which shall be deemed to have been reinvested in the underlying company’s stock) and using a 20-trading day average stock price to determine beginning and ending stock prices.  The beginning stock price is calculated by averaging the daily closing stock prices for the 20-trading days ending on December 31, 2015 and the ending stock price is calculated by averaging the daily closing stock prices for the 20-trading days ending on the last day of the performance period.  Payments are subject to reduction in accordance with the below schedule:

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Percentile Performance of BB&T TSR Relative to Peer Group TSR
	Percent Reduction in Payout


	 

	 
	< 25th
	20% reduction
	 

	 
	≥ 25th and < 40th
	10% reduction
	 

	 
	≥ 40th
	no reduction
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MICHAEL DERRICK PENINGER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:09

- cr - 00034

- DCN

- 1 )

Submitted : August 20, 2021 Decided: January 20, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD , Senior Circuit Judge s
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael Derrick Peninger , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Derrick Peninger appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We review a court’s denial o f a motion for compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in de nying Peninger ’s motion. See United States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 187

- 91 (4th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Peninger , No. 2:09

- cr - 00034

- DCN

- 1 (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED