alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014196DE.01004501.xml

| 3.7.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 196/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 196/45

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 414/2013 der Kommission vom 6. Mai 2013 zur Festlegung eines Verfahrens für die Zulassung gleicher Biozidprodukte gemäß der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 528/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 125 vom 7. Mai 2013
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 125 vom 7. Mai 2013

Auf Seite 5, Artikel 5

anstatt:

„Abweichend von Artikel 30 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 528/2012 entscheidet die befasste zuständige Behörde innerhalb von 30 Tagen nach der Validierung des Antrags gemäß Artikel 3 oder gegebenenfalls innerhalb von 30 Tagen nach dem späteren Zeitpunkt der Annahme der entsprechenden Entscheidung über das betreffende Referenzprodukt, ob die Zulassung eines gleichen Produkts gemäß Artikel 19 der genannten Verordnung erteilt oder verweigert wird.“

muss es heißen:

„Abweichend von Artikel 30 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 528/2012 entscheidet die befasste zuständige Behörde innerhalb von 60 Tagen nach der Validierung des Antrags gemäß Artikel 3 oder gegebenenfalls innerhalb von 60 Tagen nach dem späteren Zeitpunkt der Annahme der entsprechenden Entscheidung über das betreffende Referenzprodukt, ob die Zulassung eines gleichen Produkts gemäß Artikel 19 der genannten Verordnung erteilt oder verweigert wird.“

---
STATE v. HANKINS.

No. COA07-1100.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 1, 2008.

Certification Date April 21, 2008.

Appeal from the Brunswick (02CRS56816, 02CRS56817, 02CRS56818).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7447

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SEBASTIAN A. PRYOR, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (CR-01-149; CA-03-872-3) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 3, 2005 Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sebastian A. Pryor, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Sebastian A. Pryor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pryor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.DISMISSED
STATE v. WHITE.

No. COA06-1389.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS46235, 04CRS63977).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 51829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) 
Study Morbidity/Mortality Follow-up Coordinating Center
    Date: September 1, 2005
    Time: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Valerie L. Prenger, PhD., Chief, Review Branch, 
Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7924, Room 7214, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924, (301) 435-0270, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#245456414a43415652644a4c48464d0a4a4d4c0a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f78785929990928581b7999f9b959ed9999e9fd9909881">[email protected]</span></a>
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research, 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 22, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-17254 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130588 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130588 COA: 266917 Wayne CC: 87-000908-01 JAMES OSCAR JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 2, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0522 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2006

Clerk
CITIZENS ADDRESSING REASSIGMENT AND EDUCATION, INC., Jade John Litcher and Elizabeth Lee Haner v. WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.

No. 254P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Marvin Schiller, Raleigh, for Citizens, et al.

Kenneth A. Soo, Neal A. Ramee, Ann L. Majestic, Raleigh, for Wake County BOE.

Prior report: 182 N.CApp. 241, 641 S.E.2d 824.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 30th day of May 2007 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*439"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."

MARTIN, J., recused.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 452/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 452/2013 of 7 May 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications (Eichsfelder Feldgieker/Eichsfelder Feldkieker (PGI))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 452/2013                     

# of 7 May 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Eichsfelder Feldgieker/Eichsfelder                        Feldkieker (PGI))                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006                              of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Eichsfelder Feldgieker’/‘Eichsfelder                              Feldkieker’ was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name                              should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.2.****Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)**U.K.

#### GERMANYU.K.

Eichsfelder Feldgieker/Eichsfelder Feldkieker (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 188, 28.6.2012, p. 6.
STATE of North Carolina v. James Alfred Garfield BUNCH, Jr.

No. 604P05-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2007.

James A.G. Bunch, Jr., Pro Se.

Anne M. Middleton, Valerie M. Asbell, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 14th day of November 2007 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Hertford County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2007."
EXHIBIT 15 - LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C.  10549

RE:      ITI Technologies, Inc. Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Registrations No. 33-89826, No. 333-08943, No. 333-08945 and No. 333-23751)

We are aware that our report dated July 28, 1997, on our review of interim
financial information of ITI Technologies, Inc. for the period ended June 30,
1997, and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1997, is incorporated by reference in these registration
statements. Pursuant to Rule 436 (c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this
report should not be considered a part of the registration statements prepared
or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 14, 1997
Michael S. PERKINSON v. Charles HAWLEY, individually and in his capacity as Jail Administrator; R.T. Breedlove, Sheriff of Vance County, individually and in his official capacity; Western Surety Company; and CNA Surety Company.

No. 457P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Michael Perkinson, pro se.

James R. Morgan, Jr., Winston-Salem, for Hawley, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 28th day of August 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
#### In the Matter of Donald J., Jr., George E., Respondent; Bonnie A., Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 644]

In a guardianship proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated January 12, 2004, as granted the petition, awarded the petitioner guardianship of the subject child, and directed that her visitation with the subject child be supervised.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly awarded guardianship of the subject child to the petitioner *(see Matter of Alexander N.,*5 AD3d 776 [2004]; *Matter of Bogdan v Bogdan,*291 AD2d 909 [2002]; *Skidelsky v Skidelsky,*279 AD2d 356 [2001]; *Matter of Porter v Burgey,*266 AD2d 552, 553 [1999]; *Matter of Davis v Davis,*265 AD2d 552, 553 [1999]; *Matter of Vangas v Ladas,*259 AD2d 755, 755-756 [1999]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3294 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2008 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To provide for the continued performance of the functions 

of the United States Parole Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

S 3294 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Parole 

3 Commission Extension Act of 2008’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF SENTENCING REFORM ACT OF 

5 1984. 

6 For purposes of section 235(b) of the Sentencing Re7 form Act of 1984 (18 U.S.C. 3551 note; Public Law 98– 

8 473; 98 Stat. 2032), as such section relates to chapter 

9 311 of title 18, United States Code, and the United States 

10 Parole Commission, each reference in such section to ‘‘21 

11 years’’ or ‘‘21-year period’’ shall be deemed a reference 

12 to ‘‘24 years’’ or ‘‘24-year period’’, respectively. 

Passed the Senate July 21, 2008. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1176/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1176/2014 of 30 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in Union            waters of VIId by vessels flying the flag of the United Kingdom         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1176/2014                     

# of 30 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in Union waters of VIId by vessels flying the flag of the United                        Kingdom                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
POWELL v. POWELL BAIL BONDING, INC.

No. COA07-540.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from New Hanover (06CVS914).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3481 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a temporary increase 

in the new qualified hybrid motor vehicle credit for school buses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2008 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a temporary increase in the new qualified hybrid motor 

vehicle credit for school buses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN NEW QUALIFIED HY4 BRID MOTOR VEHICLE CREDIT FOR SCHOOL 

5 BUSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 30B(d)(2)(B) of the In7 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new clause: 

9 ‘‘(vi) TEMPORARY INCREASE FOR

10 SCHOOL BUSES.—In the case of any new 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3481 IS

1 qualified hybrid motor vehicle which is a 

2 school bus (as defined in section 

3 4221(d)(7)(C)), the dollar amounts speci4 fied in clause (iii) shall be increased by— 

5 ‘‘(I) 200 percent for vehicles 

6 placed in service before January 1, 

7 2010, 

8 ‘‘(II) 150 percent for vehicles 

9 placed in service after December 31, 

10 2009, and before January 1, 2011, 

11 ‘‘(III) 100 percent for vehicles 

12 placed in service after December 31, 

13 2010, and before January 1, 2012, 

14 and 

15 ‘‘(IV) 50 percent for vehicles 

16 placed in service after December 31, 

17 2011, and before January 1, 2013.’’. 

18 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 30B(j)(3) 

19 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by in20 serting ‘‘(December 31, 2012, in the case of a school 

21 bus)’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to vehicles placed in service after 

24 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Equity Office
Properties Trust, the general partner of EOP Operating Limited
Partnership (the Company), each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to his / her knowledge, on the date hereof:  (a)
    the Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2004, filed on the date
hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b)
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 16, 2005 /s/ Richard D. KincaidRichard D. KincaidPresident and Chief Executive
Officer
of Equity Office Properties Trust, the general partner
of EOP Operating Limited Partnership Date: March 16, 2005 /s/ Marsha C. WilliamsMarsha C. WilliamsExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Equity Office Properties Trust, the general partner
of EOP Operating Limited Partnership
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                   ------------



                                 CERTIFICATION

          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the report of Compton Petroleum  Corporation (the "Company")
on the Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of my
knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
     Company.


DATED this 30th day of March, 2007.


/s/ Ernie G. Sapieha
------------------------------------
Ernie G. Sapieha
President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer),
Compton Petroleum Corporation