alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, William J. Fair, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof American Skiing Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:October 30, 2006            By: /s/ William J. Fair         William J. Fair    President and Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SS.1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orphan Medical, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Timothy G. McGrath, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
|   | /s/ Timothy G. McGrath  |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Timothy G. McGrath      |
|   | Vice President and      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November 9, 2004        |

 

1

----
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.2
------------


                     METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
                               AS OF MARCH 15, 1999


                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Form S-8) Pertaining to the (i) Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. 1998 Incentive 
Stock Plan and (ii) Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. 1997 Incentive Stock Plan 
and employment and consulting agreements of our report dated March 4, 1999, 
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of 
Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for 
the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
March 15, 1999
#### In the Matter of Frank V. Smith, Respondent, v Christopher D. Bodkin et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents.

[799 NYS2d 920]

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter *573alia, to invalidate a petition designating Christopher D. Bodkin and Steven J. Flotteron as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2005, for the nomination of the Republican Party as its candidates for the public office of Councilman of the Town of Islip, Christopher D. Bodkin and Steven J. Flotteron appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated August 3, 2005, which granted the petitioner’s motion to dismiss their purported cross petition.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements *(see Matter of Bodkin v Garfinkle,*21 AD3d 571 [2005] [decided herewith]). H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# Council Decision of 23 July 2014 appointing two Estonian members and two Estonian alternate members of the Committee of the            Regions (2014/498/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 23 July 2014

# appointing two Estonian members and two Estonian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/498/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the EstonianGovernment,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015. On 21 May 2013, by Council Decision 2013/239/EU(3), Mr Mihkel JUHKAMI was appointed as alternate member until 25 January 2015.

(2)Two members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Väino                              HALLIKMÄGI and Mr Jüri PIHL.

(3)An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Saima KALEV.

(4)An alternate member's seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Mihkel JUHKAMI as member of the Committee of                              the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which                     runs until 25 January 2015:                  

as members:
                -  Mr Mihkel JUHKAMI, *Mayor of the City of Rakvere,*                                   
                -  Mr Urmas SUKLES, *Mayor of the City of Haapsalu;*                                   

and

as alternate members:
                -  Mr Hannes HANSO, *Mayor of the City of Kuressaare,*                                   
                -  Mr Rait PIHELGAS, *Mayor of Ambla Rural Municipality.*                                   

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 23 July 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.                           

3

OJ L 141, 28.5.2013, p. 43.
IN RE A.M.

No. COA07-603.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Cleveland (06JA63, 06JA64, 06JA65, 06JA66, 06JA82).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE
30, 1998, CONSOLIDTED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FOOTNOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      521    
<SECURITIES>                                  0       
<RECEIVABLES>                            55,047
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0       
<INVENTORY>                                   0       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         58,315       
<PP&E>                                    6,048       
<DEPRECIATION>                            2,813       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           86,437       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    80,295       
<BONDS>                                       0       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0       
<PREFERRED>                               2,160       
<COMMON>                                     24       
<OTHER-SE>                               (9,719)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             86,437       
<SALES>                                       0       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         20,295       
<CGS>                                         0       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            20,295       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          767       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (2,099)      
<INCOME-TAX>                                  2       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (2,101)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0       
<CHANGES>                                     0       
<NET-INCOME>                             (2,209)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.90)      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .0       
        

</TABLE>
IN RE S.M.S.

No. COA07-619.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (06JT447 LCB, 06JT448 LCB).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
# Council Decision 2014/293/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/293/CFSP of 15 April 2014 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union            and the Swiss Confederation on the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the European Union military mission to contribute            to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/293/CFSP                     

# of 15 April 2014

# on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the participation                        of the Swiss Confederation in the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces                        (EUTM Mali)                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 37 thereof, in conjunction with Article 218(5) and                           (6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)Article 8(3) of Council Decision 2013/34/CFSP of 17 January 2013 on a European Union military mission to contribute to the                              training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali)(1) provides that detailed arrangements regarding the participation of third States shall be covered by agreements concluded                              pursuant to Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union and in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 218 of the                              Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

(2)On 10 February 2014, the Council adopted a Decision authorising the opening of negotiations for a Participation Agreement                              between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the European Union                              military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian armed forces (EUTM Mali), (‘the Agreement’).

(3)The Agreement should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the                     European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) is hereby approved on                     behalf of the Union.                  

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind                     the Union.                  

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 15 April 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

1

OJ L 14, 18.1.2013, p. 19.
OFFICE OF l-$fE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN 

### 163HonorableF. A. 'Peylor, ~5g5 2 

### 264

O-752, 3hl8 48p4U'twnt has horetoforclh&4 in OpinionRo5. and O-996 that the aoamttssionars~ aourt QA aouatiea oppratingun48r ths CkmralRoe&Lav of ths State oZFexe5, a5 sat out in Tale tE9, Vol. 7, VamwL'a Alluotet54 civil stetuter, lm not 5mpov5redor authorfredto buy eutomobil55, piok-ups,oc truck5 for the 6ounty to be us54 by the mmJl58lonern In the parforwwe ot thsir 4uti55 as oaunty oomalsniom3m.

In CpinionHo. O-2362, it vas held thet th5 ocmmi5- Bioa5r5'

### oourtor sxRAmt& colmtyhe4 no authorityto pi?aheno and p5yfor 

### tires en4 tub58 for PIL eutowbile oyzldd

by a oounty oom5i56lon5r

vhuh h6 ur54 ia ths oon4ucrt of aouutybusfners. oh CpiniopHo. 0-1918, it van halt3 that ths aomnira~one~s@ aomt OS Iklla5Countyhe4 no legal authorityor paver to u55 the oounty fun48 tar 

### paymat of sqmase8 -ed ln oonneotlon vlth 5utoaobll88 driven by thy souaty oarmis8ioners.

In au ophlorr 0S thl5 depwtmant &ted Augu8t 5, 1920, aa4 pubri5h84 at p. U4 of th5 Bienn.lal Report ror th6 year5 1918. 1920, it via5 he14 that th5 ootmty oomm.ie5kme~5 are not euthorLx54 to puroha~ en4 pay for gasollns OF other automobile 8uppllierand rubait their 6ladm5thanfor to thiocsai55Loner5co' 5ourt fop audit an4 a3.Mv5aoe,

an4 alaSan far such 'mpp&ies furnhhe4 for wuah pmpo555 an not legftSm8t5ehaPge5againstths county,vhsther 50 pawha end p5i4 lar by ths oos55f5oton5rn 

### or sol4 direct to tbs tmnty W the dealer. Thl5 oplnl.6n oite5 ths oa5en of Gnippa 83. Stavmt InmVork5, 66 S. **Vi.** 3321 &igby v. State, 10 8. **V.** 760; an4HaFa5vr,liaaon4, 203 8.W.~ #5.

You stat5 -ia&r lott5r thst, 'th.le vehble ve8 us54 b7 this 5aploy55in th5 di56hargsoi hl5 4utie5 on the ma45 of ths mInty.* Thl8 belag true, it in our opinion, that the aounty auditor aan 15gally l ppxmve th5 abc+ve

ulation* ala*. Provl454, hovovoe,t@ aolslPisrionsn~ ootwt ranted th5 plahrp or 15&ly authorl504 5ome.one to do so fas the purpow of said 55tploy55 porfom.lng

en4 4256harging

hi5 duties oat,

or ln aonn5ation

vlth ths publtoroa45 of the aounty.

Trustingthat ths rongoing fully ausvimsyour inuuby, ve era
Youra verytmly

ATTORHR’X GERRML OF TXJU
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chilco River Holdings
  Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June
  30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, Thomas James Brady, Secretary-Treasurer of the
  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: August 13, 2003 | By: //s// THOMAS JAMES BRADY
|---------------------- | ----------------------------
|                       | Thomas James Brady          
|                       | Secretary-Treasurer         

---
IN RE D.J.D.

No. COA06-1627.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Davie (04J92).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40679 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN DE DIOS TORRES

- BAZALDUA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 374

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Juan De Dios Torres

- Bazaldua appeals from the sentence imposed in connection with his conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. Torres

Bazaldua argues that the written judgment c ontains a clerical error because it does not reflect that the $100 special assessment was remitted. He contends that this court should remand his case pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 10, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40679 Document: 00512964130 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2015No. 14

- 40679

Procedure 36 so that the district court can correct the written jud gment to reflect the fact that it orally remitted the assessment. Rule 36 provides that “the court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or om ission.” F ED . R. C RIM . P. 36. A clerical error occurs when the court intends to do one thing but through clerical mistake or oversight does another. United States v. Buendia

- Rangel , 553 F.3d 378, 379 ( 5th Cir. 2008 ). The record shows that the district court did not remit the assessment. Instead, the court explained to Torres

- Bazaldua that he could get relief administratively if he could not afford to pay it. Moreover, the district court lacks the authority to sua spo nte remit the assessment. See 18 U.S.C. § 3573(1); see also United States v. Nguyen , 916 F.2d 1016, 1020 (5th Cir. 1990) (stating that the assessment is mandatory and that the district court cannot decline to impose the special assessment under § 3013 bas ed on its finding that a defendant is indigent). Torres

- Bazaldua fails to show that the written judgment has a clerical error. See Buendia

- Rangel , 553 F.3d at 379

. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-40679 Document: 00512964130 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2015
Linda P. CALHOUN, M.D.; Mark T. Murphy, M.D.; Hemantkumar Patel, M.D.; Praful N. Patel, M.D.; and J. Robinson Harper, Jr., M.D. v. WHA MEDICAL CLINIC, PLLC.

No. 479P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

John M. Martin, Greenville, Matthew W. Sawchak, Raleigh, for Calhoun, et al.

Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Catharine W. Cummer, Raleigh, Michael Murchison, Andrew K. McVey, Wilmington, for WHA Medical Clinic.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of September 2006 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*6"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
STATE v. DOCKERY.

No. COA07-649.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Cumberland (06CRS56336).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                        

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance Company and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001043325                                     
<NAME>                        Charter Municipal Mortgage Acceptance Company  
<MULTIPLIER>                  1                                              
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                               13,093,023   
<SECURITIES>                         458,662,600  
<RECEIVABLES>                        9,279,482    
<ALLOWANCES>                         138,000      
<INVENTORY>                          0            
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     11,500       
<PP&E>                               0            
<DEPRECIATION>                       0            
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       492,585,806  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                15,091,600   
<BONDS>                              0            
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0            
<PREFERRED>                          0            
<COMMON>                             0            
<OTHER-SE>                           327,494,206  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         492,585,806  
<SALES>                              0            
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     28,179,048   
<CGS>                                0            
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        0            
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     4,648,842    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0            
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   1,504,334    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      22,025,872   
<INCOME-TAX>                         0            
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  0            
<DISCONTINUED>                       0            
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0            
<CHANGES>                            0            
<NET-INCOME>                         22,025,872   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .99          
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .98          
                                     


</TABLE>