alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE
  Borrower Borrowers WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION Lender Company Credit Agreement
 Section 2.03(h) Section 2.08(f)




---



##### 



SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC.By:
    /s/ DAVID P. COSPERName:
    David P. CosperTitle:
    Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer FAA CONCORD H, INC.
FAA LAS VEGAS H, INC.
FAA POWAY H, INC.
FAA SANTA MONICA V, INC.
FAA SERRAMONTE H, INC.
FAA SERRAMONTE, INC.
FAA STEVENS CREEK, INC.
FRANCISCAN MOTORS, INC.
KRAMER MOTORS INCORPORATED
SAI COLUMBUS MOTORS, LLC
SAI COLUMBUS VWK, LLC
SAI FORT MYERS H, LLC
SAI FORT MYERS VW, LLC
SAI IRONDALE IMPORTS, LLC
SAI MONTGOMERY CH, LLC
SAI NASHVILLE H, LLC
SAI NASHVILLE MOTORS, LLC
SAI OKLAHOMA CITY H, LLC
SAI TULSA N, LLC
SANTA CLARA IMPORTED CARS, INC.
SONIC  2185 CHAPMAN RD., CHATTANOOGA, LLC
SONIC  HARBOR CITY H, INC.
SONIC  SHOTTENKIRK, INC.
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE  9103 E. INDEPENDENCE, NC, LLC By:
    /s/ DAVID P. COSPERName:
    David P. CosperTitle:
    Vice President and Treasurer




---



##### 



SONIC AUTOMOTIVE 5260 PEACHTREE      INDUSTRIAL BLVD., LLC 
SONIC FREMONT, INC.
SONIC TYSONS CORNER H, INC.
SONIC TYSONS CORNER INFINITI, INC.
SONIC-BUENA PARK H, INC.
SONIC-CALABASAS A, INC.
SONIC-CAPITOL IMPORTS, INC.
SONIC-VOLVO LV, LLC
WINDWARD, INC.By:
    /s/ DAVID P. COSPERName:
    David P. CosperTitle:
    Vice President and TreasurerPHILPOTT MOTORS, LTD.
SONIC  HOUSTON V, L.P.
SONIC  LUTE RILEY, L.P.
SONIC ADVANTAGE PA, L.P.
SONIC HOUSTON JLR, LP
SONIC HOUSTON LR, L.P.
SONIC MOMENTUM JVP, L.P.
SONIC MOMENTUM VWA, L.P.
SONIC-CLEAR LAKE VOLKSWAGEN, L.P.
SONIC-JERSEY VILLAGE VOLKSWAGEN, L.P.By:
    SONIC OF TEXAS, INC.,as Sole General PartnerBy:
    /s/ DAVID P. COSPERName:
    David P. CosperTitle:
    Vice President and Treasurer




---



##### 



LOANS AND PAYMENTS WITH RESPECT THERETO
 Amount ofPrincipal or
    
    OutstandingEnd of
    
    Interest
    
    PrincipalType of
    
    Amount of
    
    Interest
    
    Paid This
    
    Balance
    
    NotationDate
    
    Loan Made
    
    Loan Made
    
    Period
    
    Date
    
    This Date
    
    Made By
STATE v. DUNN.

No. COA06-1637.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 16, 2007.

Certification Date November 5, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (05CRS106248).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 248/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 248/2013 of 19 March 2013 on the issue of import licences for applications lodged            during the first seven days of March 2013 under the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 for poultrymeat         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 248/2013                     

# of 19 March 2013

# on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of March 2013 under the tariff quotas                        opened by Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 for poultrymeat                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration                           of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences(2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 of 14 May 2007 opening and providing for the administration of tariff                           quotas in the poultrymeat sector(3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 opened tariff quotas for imports of poultrymeat products.

(2)The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of March 2013 for the subperiod from 1 April to 30                              June 2013 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued                              should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged under Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 for the subperiod                     from 1 April to 30 June 2013 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex to this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 March 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.                           

3

OJ L 125, 15.5.2007, p. 9.
| Name      of Subsidiary                                    |   |  Jurisdiction in Which Organized or      Incorporated |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |   |                                                       |
| Consolidated      Subsidiaries of Stoneridge, Inc.:        |   |                                                       |
| Stoneridge      Electronics AB                             |   | Sweden                                                     |
| Stoneridge      Electronics AS                             |   | Estonia                                                    |
| Stoneridge      Electronics Ltd.                           |   | Scotland,      United Kingdom                              |
| Stoneridge      Pollak Ltd.                                |   | England,      United Kingdom                               |
| Stoneridge      International Financial Services Company   |   | Ireland,      United Kingdom                               |
| Stoneridge      Control Devices, Inc.                      |   | Massachusetts,      United States                          |
| Stoneridge      Electronics, Inc.                          |   | Texas,      United States                                  |
| Alphabet      de Mexico S.A. de C.V.                       |   | Mexico                                                     |
| Alphabet      de Mexico de Monclova S.A. de C.V.           |   | Mexico                                                     |
| TED      de Mexico S.A. de C.V.                            |   | Mexico                                                     |
| Stoneridge      Asia Pacific Electronics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd. |   | China                                                      |
| Bolton      Conductive Systems, LLC.                       |   | Michigan,      United States                               |
|                                                       |   |                                                       |
| Equity      Method Investees of Stoneridge, Inc.:          |   |                                                       |
| PST      Eletrônica S.A.                              |   | Brazil                                                     |
| Minda      Stoneridge Instruments Ltd.                     |   | India                                                      |

----
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 742/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 742/2013 of 30 July 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 742/2013                     

# of 30 July 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE
FOOTNOTES TEHRETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                 359
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    24,969
<PP&E>                                               3,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      39,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               36,215
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          2,160
<COMMON>                                                24
<OTHER-SE>                                          (5,645)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        39,503
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    22,746
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       21,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                            37
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,140
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,082
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
BORGERSRODE v. BORGERSRODE

No. COA06-1362.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Wayne (98CVD1015).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3435 

To allow certain participants in the conservation reserve program to 

participate in the critical feed use program of the Secretary of Agriculture. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2008 

Mr. DORGAN (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. CONRAD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To allow certain participants in the conservation reserve program to participate in the critical feed use program 

of the Secretary of Agriculture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Critical Feed Use Fair5 ness Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CRITICAL FEED USE PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN CON7 SERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM PARTICI8 PANTS. 

9 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS

2 

•S 3435 IS

1 (1) CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM.—The 

2 term ‘‘conservation reserve program’’ means the con3 servation reserve program established under sub4 chapter B of chapter 1 of subtitle D of title XII of 

5 the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3831 et 

6 seq.). 

7 (2) CRITICAL FEED USE PROGRAM.—The term 

8 ‘‘critical feed use program’’ means the program de9 scribed in the notice entitled ‘‘Notice of Voluntary 

10 Modification of Conservation Reserve Program Con11 tract’’ (73 Fed. Reg. 31053), dated May 30, 2008. 

12 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

13 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

14 (b) AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any other provi15 sion of law, if an owner or operator of land enrolled in 

16 the conservation reserve program submits to the Secretary 

17 an affidavit stating that the owner or operator attempted 

18 or intended to enroll in the critical feed use program prior 

19 to July 8, 2008, the Secretary shall modify the conserva20 tion reserve program contract of the owner or operator 

21 to allow critical feed use (including haying or grazing) of 

22 the enrolled land in accordance with the terms and condi23 tions of the critical feed use program. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Miranda, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 908]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered July 7, 2003, convicting him of rape in the first degree (three counts), sexual abuse in the first degree, sexual abuse in the second degree (five counts), and endangering the welfare of a child, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.18

                     FIRST AMENDMENT DATED OCTOBER 18, 2001
                                       TO
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                         OAO TECHNOLGOY SOLUTIONS, INC.
                          RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT LETTER
                          DATE OF GRANT: July 14, 1999

                                   BACKGROUND

     WHEREAS, on July 14, 1999, OAO Technology  Solutions,  Inc. ("OAOT") made a
restricted stock grant (the "Grant") to Gregory A. Pratt ("Pratt"); and

     WHEREAS,  pursuant to the Grant,  OAOT offered to Pratt the  opportunity to
acquire from OAOT 750,000  shares of common stock of OAOT (the  "Shares") for an
aggregate cost of $2,932,500; and

     WHEREAS,  pursuant  to the  Grant,  the  Shares  are  subject  to a vesting
schedule; and

     WHEREAS, Pratt acknowledged and accepted the terms of the Grant pursuant to
an Acceptance of Grant dated July 14, 1999; and

     WHEREAS, OAOT desires to fully accelerate the vesting of all of the Shares.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the foregoing and mutual  covenants
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which is hereby  acknowledged,  the parties hereto,  intending to be
legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

Each of OAOT and Pratt  acknowledges  and agrees  that the vesting of all of the
Shares is hereby  accelerated in full as of the date hereof and the  Restriction
Period (as such term is defined in the Grant)  shall end as of the date  hereof.

None of the provisions of the Restricted Stock Grant Letter, including,  without
limitation,  Section  4(b) and  Section  5,  shall  limit  Pratt in any way from
selling, assigning, transferring,  pledging or otherwise disposing of the Shares
to any person or entity.

This  Amendment  may be  executed  either by a manual  signature  or a facsimile
version  of a  manual  signature  in  any  number  of  counterparts,  each  such
counterpart  being  considered  an  original,   and  when  taken  together,  all
counterparts shall be deemed one document.

This  Amendment  shall be construed and enforced in accordance  with the laws of
the State of Delaware  without  regard to the  application  of the principles of
conflicts or choice of laws.

          IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  have caused  this  Amendment  to be
     executed and delivered as of the date first above written.

                                        OAOT Technology Solutions, Inc.

                                        By:___________________________________
                                        Name:
                                        Title:

                                        ______________________________________
                                        Gregory A. Pratt, Individually


                                       49
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6948
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID LEWIS OUTLAW, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-3) Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 21, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Lewis Outlaw, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Glen Reel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Outlaw , No. CR-95-3 (E.D. Va. June 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5771 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5771

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for a project or program named for 
      an individual then serving as a Member, Delegate, Resident 
        Commissioner, or Senator of the United States Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2008

Mr. McCaul of Texas (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Broun of Georgia, 
   Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida, Mr. Campbell of California, Mr. 
Flake, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Gingrey, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Issa, 
  Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Kline of Minnesota, Mr. 
  Latta, Mr. McCotter, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Walberg, Mr. 
   Tiberi, Mr. Sali, Mr. Reichert, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Poe, and Mr. Mack) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of Federal funds for a project or program named for 
      an individual then serving as a Member, Delegate, Resident 
        Commissioner, or Senator of the United States Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN FEDERAL FUNDS.

    No Federal funds may used for a project or program named for an 
individual then serving as a Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, 
or Senator of the United States Congress.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement (No.
333-52005)  on Form S-1 of U.S.  Timberlands  Company,  LP, of our report  dated
January 21, 2000 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of U.S. Timberlands
Company,  LP and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated  statements of  operations,  changes in partners'  capital and cash
flows for the years then ended,  which  report  appears in the December 31, 1999
Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. Timberlands Company, LP.


                                             Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP




New York, New York
April 14, 2000