alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 7, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 53078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 05-2303; MB Docket No. 03-222; RM-10812]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Charlotte and Grand Ledge, MI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to a Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 68 FR 62554 
(November 5, 2003), this Report and Order substitutes Channel 225A for 
Channel 224A, at FM Station WQTX, Charlotte, Michigan, reallots Channel 
225A to Grand Ledge, Michigan, and modifies Station WQTX's license 
accordingly. The coordinates for Channel 225A at Grand Ledge Michigan 
are 42-42-17 NL and 84-37-20 WL, with a site restriction of 11.5 
kilometers (7.2 miles) southeast of Grande Ledge.

DATES: Effective October 3, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Barthen Gorman, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 03-322, adopted August 17, 2005, and 
released August 19, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The document may also be 
purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and 
Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government 
Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

0
Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as 
follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 reads as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Michigan, is 
amended by removing Channel 224A at Charlotte, and adding Grand Ledge, 
Channel 225A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 05-17522 Filed 9-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

DWIGHT C. BROWN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RICHARD DANZIG, United States

Secretary of the Navy,

No. 99-1652

Defendant-Appellee,

and

JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge.

(CA-98-1466-AM)

Submitted: August 24, 1999

Decided: September 20, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Dwight C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Dwight C. Brown appeals the order of the district court entering

judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Navy and denying Brown's

employment discrimination claim filed pursuant to Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e - 2000e-17 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999). Finding no error, we affirm.

Brown first claims that the district court erred in denying his claim

of retaliatory discharge. We find no error because the evidence clearly

established that Brown's termination was based on his numerous

unauthorized absences, and not because of any protected activity. See

Carter v. Ball, 33 F.3d 450, 460 (4th Cir. 1994).

Brown next claims error in the district court's refusal to consider

his claims of race and gender based discrimination. In order for a federal employee to proceed on a claim of discrimination under Title VII,

he must first exhaust his administrative remedies. See Young v.

National Ctr. for Health Servs. Research, 828 F.2d 235, 237 (4th Cir.

1987). Brown was required to file a formal complaint within fifteen

days of his final counseling session with his EEO counselor. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.107 (1999). It is uncontradicted that he failed to do so.

Because Brown has failed to administratively exhaust his claims of

gender or race discrimination below, he is barred from litigating those

matters in the federal courts.

We accordingly affirm the order of the district court. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-983

Lower Tribunal No. 22-CC-001417

_____________________________

FRANK GARCIA,

Appellant, 

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the County Court for Lee County.

Nicole Lynn Mirra, Judge.

January 9, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA, WHITE and MIZE, JJ., concur.

Jeremy D. Bailie, of Weber, Crabb & Wein, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

C. Ryan Jones and Scot E. Samis, of Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, 

St. Petersburg, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Exhibit 10.7





 


Magna Management LLC 


[address]


 


 


____________, 2016


M I Acquisitions, Inc.

c/o Magna Management LLC


5 Hanover Square


New York, NY 10004


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm
our agreement that commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) relating to the initial public offering of the securities of M I Acquisitions, Inc. (the “Company”)
and continuing until the consummation by the Company of its initial business combination or the distribution of the trust
account to the Company’s then public shareholders (as described in the Registration Statement), Magna Management LLC (the
“Firm”) shall make available to the Company certain general and administrative services, including the use of office
space, utilities and secretarial support, as may be required by the Company from time to time, at [___________________] (or any
successor location). In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay the Firm at the rate of $10,000 per month. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if the Company’s audit committee determines that the Company lacks sufficient funds outside of the trust account
to pay its actual or anticipated expenses, all payments hereunder shall be deferred until the consummation of its initial business
combination. Any such deferred amount shall accrue without interest and be due and payable no later than the date of the consummation
of our initial business combination.






 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	MAGNA MANAGEMENT LLC 
	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title:	 


 


	
        Agreed to and Accepted as of the date first written

        above by:
	 
	 	 
	M I ACQUISITIONS, INC.	 
	 	 
	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 117/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 117/2014 of 6 February 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 117/2014                     

# of 6 February 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 February 2014.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. REESE.

No. COA06-1098.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS96775, 03CRS96776, 03CRS96777, 03CRS96778, 03CRS96779, 03CRS96780, 03CRS96781, 03CRS96782, 03CRS96783, 03CRS96784, 03CRS96785, 03CRS96786, 03CRS96787, 03CRS96788, 03CRS98645, 03CRS98646).

Case reported without published opinion. New trial.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1172/2014Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1172/2014 of 31 October 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1172/2014                     

# of 31 October 2014

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing                           a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79,                           (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued007699N
Caribbean American Freight, Inc., 9393 NW., 13th Street, Miami, FL 33172
June 16, 2005.001278F
Interproject Shipping Services, Inc., 10 Exchange Place, 19th Floor, Jersey City, NJ 07302
July 1, 2005.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 05-16857 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Presidential Documents

50949 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 166 

Monday, August 29, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2005–32 of August 17, 2005 

Continuation of U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to the 

Government of Colombia 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[and] the Secretary of Defense 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1012 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, as amended (22 U.S.C. 

2291–4), I hereby certify, with respect to Colombia, that (1) interdiction 

of aircraft reasonably suspected to be primarily engaged in illicit drug trafficking in that country’s airspace is necessary because of the extraordinary 

threat posed by illicit drug trafficking to the national security of that country; 

and (2) that country has appropriate procedures in place to protect against 

innocent loss of life in the air and on the ground in connection with 

such interdiction, which shall at a minimum include effective means to 

identify and warn an aircraft before the use of force is directed against 

the aircraft. 

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal Register 

W 

and to notify the Congress of this determination. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 17, 2005. 

[FR Doc. 05–17246 

Filed 8–26–05; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P
STATE of North Carolina v. James Earl EWELL.

No. 108P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Glenn Gerding, for Ewell.

Q. Shante Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: 168 N.C.App. 98, 606 S.E.2d 914.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of December 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of March 2008."
TOTAL RENAL CARE OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC, Petitioner v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICE REGULATION (f/k/a Division of Facility Services), Certificate of Need Section, Respondent and Bio-Medical Applications of North Carolina, Inc. and Nephro Rentals, LLC, Respondent-Intervenor.

No. 44P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 29, 2008.

William R. Shenton, Thomas R. West, Pamela A. Scott, Raleigh, for Total Renal Care.

Joy H. Thomas, for Bio-Medical Applications, et al,

June S. Ferrell, Assistant Attorney General, for NCDHHS.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 30th day of January 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of February 2008."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN T-NETIX, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                             122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                        73
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          41,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                            367
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,737
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,506
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,401
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (397)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (397)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Devozeo Demontra PERSON.

No. 2A08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 26, 2008.

K.D. Sturgis, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of February 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 19th day of March 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of February 2008."
ARMSTRONG v. BARRACK.

No. 504P06-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Christopher N. Heiskell, for Barrack.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of May 2007 by Plaintiff for judgment with supporting affidavit and documentation in his favor and against appellees:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of December 2007."