alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. William Joseph MOORE.

No. 460A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 7, 2008.

Marilyn G. Ozer, William F.W. Massengale, Chapel Hill, for Moore.

Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of February 2008 by State of NC for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Allowed. State of NC shall have up to and including the 3rd day of March 2008 to file and serve his/her response with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 7th day of February 2008."
```

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vivian
Chu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Vivian Chu
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be
retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```
EXHIBIT 10.7
 AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
       1




---



##### 



Compensation Upon Termination
  2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Coverage Costs
 4




---



##### 



e
  12(e):
  5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



later
 7




---



##### 



earlier
 8




---



##### 



provided, however,
   9




---



##### 



Section 409A Penalty Tax
 10




---



##### 



later (60)-day
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 JOSEPH L. DAMICO
    
    
    
    APOLLO GROUP, INC./s/ Joseph L. DAmico
Dated: DEC 12, 2008
    
    
    
    By:

Title:
    /s/ Charles B. Edelstein
Chief Executive OfficerDated:
    
    Dec 12, 2008
 11
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1043/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1043/2013 of 24 October 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for ling in EU and international            waters of V by vessels flying the flag of France         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1043/2013                     

# of 24 October 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for ling in EU and international waters of V by vessels flying the flag of France

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
STATE of North Carolina v. Carl Antonio SCOTT.

No. 410P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for Carl Antonio Scott.

Martin McCracken, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 9th day of August 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of August 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."
Jay B. SABLE v. D. Stella SABLE (now Knight).

No. 351P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Jay B. Sable, for Jay B. Sable.

Lynne M. Kay, for D. Stella Sable.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 7th day of July 2006 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of July 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of AboveNet, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph P.
Ciavarella, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March
      16, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Joseph P. CiavarellaJoseph
      P. Ciavarella
                Chief
      Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Terrence Lorenzo ROBINSON.

No. 204P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Kevin P. Bradley, Durham, for Robinson.

Daniel S. Johnson, Ted R. Williams, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
**Exhibit 15.1** **Report of    Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     To the Board of Directors and    Stockholders of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International:     We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance    sheets of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International and its    subsidiaries as of June 30, 2006 and the related    consolidated condensed statements of operations and consolidated    condensed statements of comprehensive income for each of the    three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005    and the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows for the    six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. These    interim financial statements are the responsibility of the    Company’s management.     We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A    review of interim financial information consists principally of    applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons    responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is    substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in    accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting    Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an    opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.    Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.     Based on our review, we are not aware of any material    modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed    consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in    conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the    United States of America.     We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of    the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),    the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2005,    and the related consolidated statements of operations, of    stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for the year then    ended, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the    Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of    December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of the    Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of    December 31, 2005; and in our report dated March 15,    2006, we expressed unqualified opinions thereon. The    consolidated financial statements and management’s    assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over    financial reporting referred to above are not presented herein.    In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying    condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,    2005 is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to    the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    Orange County, California    August 7, 2006
# Decision of the European Parliament of 16 December 2014 electing the European Ombudsman (2014/949/EU, Euratom)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Decision of the European Parliament

# of 16 December 2014

# electing the European Ombudsman

# (2014/949/EU, Euratom)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 24                           and Article 228 thereof,                        

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to its Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing                           the performance of the Ombudsman's duties(1),                        

Having regard to Rule 219 of its Rules of Procedure,

Having regard to the call for nominations(2),                        

Having regard to its vote of 16 December 2014,

HAS DECIDED:

to elect Emily O'REILLY to exercise the function of European Ombudsman until the end of the parliamentary term.

Done at Strasbourg, 16 December 2014.

*For the European Parliament*                            

*The President*                            

M. Schulz                            

1

OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 15.                           

2

OJ C 293, 2.9.2014, p. 13.
STATE v. GINYARD.

No. COA07-594.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Buncombe (05CRS54941).

Cases reported without published opinion. Vacated.
COOPER EX REL. STATE v. McADEN

No. COA07-165

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 19, 2008.

Certification Date March 10, 2008.

Appeal from Wilson (05CVS704).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. JOHNSON.

No. COA06-1557.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 16, 2007.

Certification Date November 5, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CRS208288, 05CRS208289).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
# European Council Decision of 30 August 2014 appointing the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security            Policy (2014/639/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# European Council Decision

# of 30 August 2014

# appointing the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

# (2014/639/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 18(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1)European Council Decision 2009/950/EU, taken with the agreement of the President of the Commission(1), of 4 December 2009, appointed the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy until 31 October 2014.

(2)In accordance with Article 17(7), third subparagraph, of the Treaty on European Union, the President, the High Representative                              of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the other members of the Commission are subject as a body to a vote                              of consent by the European Parliament.

(3)The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy should be appointed for the period from the end                              of the current term of office of the Commission until 31 October 2019.

(4)The President-elect has agreed to the appointment of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security                              Policy,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Ms Federica MOGHERINI is hereby appointed High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for the                     period from the end of the current term of office of the Commission until 31 October 2019.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall be notified to Ms Federica MOGHERINI by the President of the European Council.

It shall take effect on the day of its notification.

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall be published in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 30 August 2014.

*For the European Council*                            

*The President*                            

H. Van Rompuy                            

1

OJ L 328, 15.12.2009, p. 69.
Exhibit



EXECUTION VERSION        Contract #2-23975446-5



Amendment #5
to the
Yahoo! Publisher Network Contract #2-23975446
Effective as of January 1, 2011, as amended (“Agreement”)
This Amendment #5 to the Agreement (“Amendment #5”) is effective as of the latter date of Yahoo! Inc.’s or Publisher’s signature below (“Amendment #5 Effective Date”) by and between Yahoo! Inc. and Yahoo! EMEA Limited (as successor to Yahoo! Sarl and together with Yahoo! Inc.,“Yahoo”) on the one hand, and InfoSpace LLC (f/k/a InfoSpace Sales LLC) and Blucora, Inc. (f/k/a InfoSpace Inc., and collectively with InfoSpace Sales LLC, “Publisher”) on the other hand. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 
In consideration of these mutual covenants and for such other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, Yahoo and Publisher desire to amend the Agreement as follows:
		
	1.
	The End Date of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with October 31, 2016.  For clarity, the Agreement shall not automatically renew after the End Date. 




		
	2.
	In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of the Agreement and the terms and conditions of this Amendment #5, the terms and conditions of this Amendment #5 shall control.  Except as amended by this Amendment #5, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. This Amendment #5 may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment #5 to the Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Amendment #5 Effective Date.
	
		
	YAHOO! INC.
By: /s/ Ian Weingarten
Name: Ian Weingarten
Title: SVP Corporate Development & Partnerships
Date: July 22, 2016
	INFOSPACE LLC
By: /s/ Eric Emans
Name: Eric Emans
Title: Vice President and Treasurer
Date: July 27, 2016

	YAHOO! EMEA LIMITED
By: /s/ William R. Cobane
Name: William R. Cobane
Title: Director
Date: July 26, 2016
	BLUCORA, INC. (as guarantor under Section 22 of Attachment B)


By: /s/ Eric Emans
Name: Eric Emans
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: July 27, 2016
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Lauren P. Silvernail, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ISTA Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.



|Date: October 20, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    Lauren P. Silvernail
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|                       |  |  |  |
IN RE C.H.

No. COA06-1041

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Durham (99J21).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 10.66
  SUMMARY OF THE 2011 BONUS PLAN
  A bonus pool has been set for achievement of various levels of 2011 consolidated adjusted EBITDA set by the Compensation Committee.  The target payouts (as a percentage of 2011 base compensation) and performance targets under the 2011 Bonus Plan for the bonus pool in which the named executive officers (other than Mr. Jacquay) participate are as follows:
 
 (dollars in millions)Percentage of 2011 Base Compensation
26%

29%

32%

35%

38%

41%

44%

47%

50%ConsolidatedAdjusted EBITDA
$177.2

$184.2

$191.2

$198.2

$205.2

$212.2

$219.2

$226.2

$233.2
 
 The target payouts (as a percentage of 2011 base compensation) and performance targets under the 2011 Bonus Plan for Mr. Jacquay are as follows:
 
 (dollars in millions)Target Payout
$0.186

$0.207

$0.229

$0.250

$0.271

$0.293

$0.314

$0.336

$0.357Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA
$177.2

$184.2

$191.2

$198.2

$205.2

$212.2

$219.2

$226.2

$233.2
 
 The achievement of $198.2 million in adjusted EBITDA (the “2011 Bonus Target”) serves as the bonus target for the named executive officers under the 2008 Employment Agreements.  If the 2011 Bonus Target is not achieved, no bonus payments are required to be made to these executives.  When the 2011 Bonus Target is met or exceeded, the Compensation Committee retains the right to pay these officers additional discretionary amounts from a $1.0 million discretionary pool that is over and above the bonus pool established based upon the percentage of 2011 base compensation at the level of consolidated adjusted EBITDA achieved at the 2011 Bonus Target or higher levels.  The bonus pool
will be increased or decreased based upon the percentage of base compensation associated with the adjusted EBITDA achieved set forth in the 2011 Bonus Plan.  Bonus payments to employees from the bonus pool are discretionary except that in accordance with their employment agreements, each of the named executive officers is entitled to a bonus in the amount of 35% of his base salary (or for Mr. Jacquay, $250,000) upon the achievement of the 2011 Bonus Target.
 
 Each named executive officer will be entitled to receive payment of his bonus, if any, for 2011 by March 15, 2012, if he is employed on December 31, 2011.