alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned  chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
Registrant  hereby certify that, to their  knowledge,  this Quarterly  Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                            By:/s/ Don Jennings
                               ----------------------------------------------
                               Name:    Don Jennings
                               Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer



                            By:/s/ R. Clay Hulette
                               ----------------------------------------------
                               Name:    R. Clay Hulette
                               Title:   Vice President and Chief Financial
                                        Officer

Date: November 12, 2002
STATE of North Carolina v. Johnnie Leonard MONTGOMERY.

No. 245P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Christy E. Wilhelm, for Montgomery.

Hal F. Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of May 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
STATE v. PRATT.

No. COA07-155.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS85660, 05CRS85661, 05CRS85662, 05CRS85663, 05CRS86016).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.
Polly P. GRADY v. Anson J. GRADY.

No. 277P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Anson J. Grady, pro se.

Sofie W. Hosford, Melodi R. Hayes, Bolivia, for Polly Grady.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th day of June 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of June 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In re the Matter of

the Personal Restraint Petition of

No. 48492-7-II

STEWART MICHAEL RIGGS,

Petitioner.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

JOHANSON,J. — Stewart Riggs seeks relief from personal restraint imposed following his 

pleas of guilty in Kitsap County in 2014 to possession of a stolen vehicle and to second degree 

identity theft and in Pierce County to second degree identity theft.1

First, as to the Kitsap County second degree identity theft conviction, the trial court 

imposed a sentence of 57 months of confinement and 12 months of community custody. Riggs 

argues that this sentence is illegal because the combination of the terms of confinement and 

community custody exceed the 60-month statutory maximum punishment for the crime. RCW 

9.35.020(3); RCW 9A.20.021(1)(c). The State concedes that Riggs is correct and that the sentence 

violates RCW 9.94A.701(9), which requires that the term of community custody be reduced so as 

to not exceed the statutory maximum. We accept the State’s concession and remand Riggs’s 

judgment and sentence for correction.

Second, Riggs argues that the State breached the plea agreement when it did not return his 

cell phone and Rolex watch that the State had seized. But he presents no evidence of an agreement 

 

1 We issued the mandate of Riggs’s direct appeal on September 23, 2015, making his February 1, 

2016 petition timely filed. RCW 10.73.090(3)(b).

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

September 13, 2016
No. 48492-7-II

2

to return his cell phone and watch, and to the contrary, in his statement on plea of guilty, Riggs 

agreed to forfeiture of all seized property. He asserts, but presents no evidence to support, that his 

trial counsel promised to write the return of the cell phone and watch into his judgment and 

sentence. Riggs does not demonstrate that the State breached its plea agreement or that he received 

ineffective assistance of counsel.

Finally, Riggs argues that the State undercut the plea agreement at his Pierce County 

sentencing when the deputy prosecutor stated that the global plea agreement “was made by her 

boss, however if it was up to her she would have [to] ask for a much longer sentence.” Pet. at 19. 

But the transcript of the sentencing hearing contains no such statement. Riggs does not 

demonstrate that the State undercut the plea agreement. 

We grant Riggs’s personal restraint petition in part and remand his Kitsap County judgment 

and sentence for correction. We deny the remainder of his petition.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, 

it is so ordered.

JOHANSON, J.

We concur:

WORSWICK, J.

BJORGEN, C.J.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                              OMEGA CABINETS, LTD.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>

                                                                                           Year ended
                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      December 27,     January 2,     January 1,     December 30,    December 29,
                                                          1997            1999           2000            2000            2001
<S>                                               <C>                <C>            <C>           <C>             <C>
                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income before income taxes and
   extraordinary item                                  $  3,460,653      $10,838,026    $26,620,101    $27,625,206    $35,141,897

Fixed charges:

   Interest expense                                      16,311,997       15,074,327     17,445,914     17,342,449     14,983,240

   Estimated portion of rental expense attributable
     to interest costs (25%)                                402,750          384,750        594,250        636,500        639,500
                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total fixed charges                                      16,714,747       15,459,077     18,040,164     17,978,949     15,622,740
                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges          $20,175,400      $26,297,103    $44,660,265    $45,604,155    $50,764,637
                                                    ================================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                             1.2               1.7           2.5            2.5            3.2

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edwin Feliciano, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 824]

*1037Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered October 16, 2003, as amended October 29, 2003, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, burglary in the second degree, robbery in the second degree, and assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea of guilty is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

It is clear from the face of the record that the defendant’s plea of guilty was induced by a promise from the Supreme Court that could not be fulfilled *(see People v Mills,*1 NY3d 269 [2003]). Thus, on the particular facts presented, vacatur of the plea is appropriate *(see People v Selikoff,*35 NY2d 227 [1974], *cert denied*419 US 1122 [1975]; *People v McCready,*296 AD2d 423 [2002]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

The Board of Directors
VerticalNet, Inc.


The audits referred to in our report dated January 28, 2000, included the
related financial statement schedule as of December 31, 1999, and for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, included in this
annual report on Form 10-K of VerticalNet, Inc. This financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our
audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-72143 and No. 333-89305) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements (No.
333-30254 and No. 333-30408) on Form S-3 of VerticalNet, Inc. of our report
dated January 28, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
VerticalNet, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K
of VerticalNet, Inc.


KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2000
W. Duke KIMBRELL v. Diane C. ROBERTS.

No. 516P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Bruce M. Simpson, Charlotte, for Roberts.

Douglas P. Arthurs, Gastonia, Adam H. Charnes, Tonya R. Deem, James J. Hefferan, Jr., Winston-Salem, Deborah L. Fletcher, Charlotte, for Kimbrell.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 650 S.E.2d 444.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of October 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."
|   |                                   | Jurisdiction |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------------|--------|
| 1.     | AboveNet Communications, Inc.          | Delaware     |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 2.     | AboveNet International, Inc.           | Delaware     |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 3.     | AboveNet Canada, Inc.                  | Canada       |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 4.     | AboveNet of VA, L.L.C.                 | Virginia     |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 5.     | AboveNet of Utah, L.L.C.               | Delaware     |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 6.     | MFN Japan KK                           | Japan        |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 7.     | AboveNet Communications Europe Limited | U.K.         |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 8.     | MFN Europe Finance, Inc.               | Delaware     |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 9.     | MFN International LLC                  | Delaware     |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 10.    | MFN Europe Limited                     | U.K.         |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 11.    | AboveNet Communications UK Limited     | U.K.         |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 12.    | AN Communications, Inc.                | Taiwan       |   |
|   |                                   |         |   |
| 13.    | AboveNet Toronto, Inc.                 | Canada       |   |

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Ernest Gonzalez SILVA.

No. 552P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Ernest G. Silva, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Ricky Bowman, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th day of October 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
In the Matter of W.R.

No. 560PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 5, 2007.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th day of December 2007 by Appellee (Juvenile) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Appellee (Juvenile) shall have up to and including the 14th day of January 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of December 2007."
STATE v. GRAVERAN.

No. COA07-379.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Harnett (04CRS51252, 04CRS51253).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Council Implementing Decision 2014/271/CFSPShow full title

Council Implementing Decision 2014/271/CFSP of 12 May 2014 implementing Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures            against Côte d'Ivoire         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision 2014/271/CFSP                     

# of 12 May 2014

# implementing Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire(1), and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 29 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/656/CFSP.

(2)The Council carried out a review of the measures referred to in point (b) of Article 4(1) and in point (b) of Article 5(1)                              of Decision 2010/656/CFSP, in accordance with Article 10(3) of that Decision.

(3)The Council has determined that there are no longer grounds for keeping one person on the list set out in Annex II to Decision                              2010/656/CFSP.

(4)In addition, the information in relation to two persons on the list set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/656/CFSP should be                              updated.

(5)Decision 2010/656/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex II to Decision 2010/656/CFSP is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Annex II to Decision 2010/656/CFSP is amended as follows:

The entry for the following person is replaced by the following:

The entry for the following person is renamed as follows:

‘Justin Koné Katina’ is replaced by ‘Justin Koné Katinan’

The entry for the following person is deleted:

Oulaï Delafosse

1

OJ L 285, 30.10.2010, p. 28.
McLESKEY v. CAROLINA SCCS.

No. COA06-1648.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 16, 2007.

Certification Date November 5, 2007.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. 305698).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Eden Bioscience Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nathaniel T. Brown, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date: May 5, 2009


| |  |  |  | /s/ Nathaniel T.
BrownNathaniel T. Brown Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
| |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Enviro Voraxial
Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Alberto DiBella, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/Alberto DiBella
    ------------------
    Alberto DiBella
    Principal Executive Officer
    April 14, 2008
Dianne ATKINS v. Rodney A. MORTENSON.

No. 415A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Douglas S. Harris, for Atkins.

Deanna Davis Anderson, Raleigh, for Mortenson.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 644 S.E.2d 625.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff on the 23rd day of August 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendant, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
STATE v. MITCHELL.

No. COA07-956.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from Wake (06CRS26800).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      10,346,656
<SECURITIES>                                18,828,706
<RECEIVABLES>                                  268,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,058,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          395,733
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,662,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,058,302
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               902,056
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                808,465 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   808,465 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            808,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   808,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>