alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Form 10-K for the year  ended January 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   1,751,800
<SECURITIES>                                               365,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                              769,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         3,060,400
<PP&E>                                                   1,613,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (1,235,535)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           3,750,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,361,100
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                    130
<COMMON>                                                   115,700
<OTHER-SE>                                               2,223,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             3,750,600
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         1,004,600
<CGS>                                                    1,146,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            1,804,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             6,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           4,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (810,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (810,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. PARKER.

No. COA06-138.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Yancey (04CRS50403).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
EXHIBIT 15.1





Club  Corporation  International
Dallas,  Texas

Ladies  and  Gentlemen:

Re:    Registration  Statement  Nos.  33-89818,  33-96568  and  333-08041

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we acknowledge our
awareness  of  the use therein of our report dated October 10, 1997 related to
our  review  of  interim  financial  information.

Pursuant  to  Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered  part  of  a  registration  statement  prepared  or certified by an
accountant  or  a  report  prepared  or  certified by an accountant within the
meaning  of  sections  7  and  11  of  the  Act.




                                   KPMG  Peat  Marwick  LLP



Dallas,  Texas
October  16,  1997
# C_2013276EN.01000601.xml

| 25.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/6

---

COUNCIL STATEMENT

2013/C 276/02

The Council welcomes the efforts made by the European Economic and Social Committee to create a more transparent system for the payment of daily allowances and reimbursement of travelling expenses of members of the European Economic and Social Committee and their alternates.

The Council stresses that expenditure on travel by EU institutions should be efficient and provide value for money. The Council therefore calls upon the European Economic and Social Committee to take all appropriate measures to apply the lowest possible cost options for travel and allowances on an ongoing basis.

---
STATE v. Randy Lynn ATKINS.

No. 9A94-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 10, 2006.

Sandra Smith, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of March 2006 by Petitioner for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Petitioner (Randy Lynn Atkins) shall have up to and including the 25th day of April 2006 to file and serve his Petition for Writ of Certiorari with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of March 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. German GARCIA.

No. 421P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 8, 2007.

German Garcia, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 20th day of August 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Johnston County, the following order was entered and *702is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of November 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             143
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,429
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,866
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,711
<LOANS>                                        112,686
<ALLOWANCE>                                         98
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,710
<DEPOSITS>                                      86,693
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,739
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,423
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 128,710
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,054
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  195
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    19
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,268
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,075
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,166
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,102
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        3
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (157)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (103)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (103)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.19
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       204
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    95
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   98
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             98
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Boston Properties, Inc., the sole general partner of Boston Properties Limited Partnership (the Company), hereby certifies to my knowledge that the Companys annual report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification shall not be deemed
filed for any purpose, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Date: March 2, 2009



/s/    EDWARD H.
LINDEEdward H. LindeChief Executive Officer of Boston Properties, Inc., sole general partner of Boston Properties Limited Partnership
STATE v. JONES.

No. COA06-1332.

Court of appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 18, 2007.

Certification Date October 8, 2007.

Appeal from Buncombe (05CRS9577, 05CRS55842).

Case reported without published opinion No error.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00291-CR

ROBBIN RAY DAVIS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1065305D

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Robbin Ray Davis pleaded guilty to sexual assault of a child, a 

second degree felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.011(a)(2) (West 2011). 

The trial court deferred adjudication of Davis’s offense and placed him on 

community supervision for a term of seven years. The State subsequently filed a 

petition to proceed to adjudication, alleging Davis had violated three of his 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

community-supervision conditions. Davis pleaded true to two of the alleged 

violations, including failing to complete his community-service hours. The trial 

court found all three allegations to be true, adjudicated Davis guilty, and 

sentenced him to twenty years’ confinement. This appeal followed.

Davis’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw 

as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet 

the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation 

of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. See

386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). In compliance with Kelly v. 

State, counsel notified Davis of his motion to withdraw, provided him a copy of 

the brief, informed him of his right to file a pro se response, provided him a form 

motion for pro se access to the appellate record that lacked only Davis’s 

signature and the date, provided instructions to file the pro se form within ten 

days and gave him this court’s address, and informed him of his pro se right to 

seek discretionary review should this court hold the appeal to be frivolous. See

436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). This court afforded Davis the 

opportunity to file a brief on his own behalf, but he did not do so. 

As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the 

record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the appeal is 

frivolous. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); 

Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only 
3

then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with 

counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in 

the record that arguably might support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 

S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s 

motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/s/ Sue Walker

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: March 26, 2015
STATE v. James Curtis WILLIAMSON.

No. 179P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of April 2007 by Defendant for Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Darrell CRAWFORD.

No. 574P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Don Willey, for Crawford.

Angel Gray, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of November 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
EXHIBIT 15.1





Club  Corporation  International
Dallas,  Texas

Ladies  and  Gentlemen:

Re:    Registration  Statement  Nos.  33-89818,  33-96568  and  333-08041

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated April 24, 1997 related to our
review  of  interim  financial  information.

Pursuant  to  Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered  part  of  a  registration  statement  prepared  or certified by an
accountant  or  a  report  prepared  or  certified by an accountant within the
meaning  of  sections  7  and  11  of  the  Act.




                                   KPMG  Peat  Marwick



Dallas,  Texas
May  1,  1997
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3180

AN ACT

To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher 

Education Act of 1965.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 3180 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PRO2 GRAMS. 

3 (a) EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.—Section 2(a) of the 

4 Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 (Public Law 

5 109–81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘June 30, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘July 31, 2008’’. 

7 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec8 tion, or in the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 

9 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit or oth10 erwise alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or 

11 the durations of, programs contained in the amendments 

12 made by the Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005 

13 (Public Law 109–171), by the College Cost Reduction and 

14 Access Act (Public Law 110–84), or by the Ensuring Con15 tinued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 (Public Law 

16 110–227) to the provisions of the Higher Education Act 

17 of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection Act of 

18 2004. 

Passed the Senate June 23, 2008. 

Attest:

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3180

AN ACT

To temporarily extend the programs under the 

Higher Education Act of 1965.
WARD v. FLOORS PERFECT, et al.

No. 339A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 26, 2007.

Zachary C. Bolen, Raleigh, for Floors Perfect, et al.

*245The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of October 2007 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (David Ward) shall have up to and including the 9th day of November 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of October 2007."
STATE v. George Thomas WILKERSON.

No. 170A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 25, 2007.

Andrew M. Gregson, Assistant District Attorney, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of September 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Serve Proposed Record on Appeal:

> "Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 29th day of October 2007 to serve his/her proposed record upon *893the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of September 2007."
COUNTY OF DURHAM v. AREC 3, LLC, et al.

No. 427P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Jay Ferguson, Durham, Richard Bydee, for AREC 3, LLC.

Marie Inserra, for County of Durham.

Richard Weintraub, for City of Durham.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of October *2612007 by Petitioner (Hill) for Extension of Time to Respond to AREC 3, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Prohibition, Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Petition for Writ of Supersedeas and Motion for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of October 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000929498
<NAME> THE TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,311,933
<CASH>                                           8,783
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         401,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,537,895
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,002,295
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        6,827,621
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     493,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,537,895
<PREMIUMS>                                       6,769
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             49,163
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (9,249)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  30,918
<BENEFITS>                                      34,116
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     14,767
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             3,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,404
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,526
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,526
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Edwards ROGERS.

No. 28P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Matthew Wunsche, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Timothy Rogers.

Melissa Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 23rd day of January 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of January 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
STATE v. BLOUNT

No. COA06-1482.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Wayne (05CRS56983).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 27, 2020

a1019 

# Order

Clerk October 27, 2020

159497

TAMARA NAPPIER, as Next Friend of

TAKARIE NAPPIER, a Minor, and ALL

OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 159497

COA: 344363

Court of Claims: 16

- 000071

- MM

GOVERNOR, DARNELL EARLEY, DANIEL

WYANT, LIANE SHEKTER SMITH, BRADLEY

WURFEL, EDEN VIC TORIA WELLS, NANCY

PEELER, ROBERT SCOTT, NICK LYON and

GERALD AMBROSE,

Defendants,

and

STEPHEN BUSCH, PATRICK COOK, and

MICHAEL PRYSBY,

Defendants

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

By order of July 2, 2019, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance for Mays v Governor (Docket

Nos. 157335

- 7, 157340

- 2). On order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July

29, 2 020, ___ Mich ___ (2020), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED,

because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this

Court.

C LEMENT , J., not participating due to her prior involvement as chief legal coun sel

for the Governor.