alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








AMENDMENT 
TO THE
CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION
ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN




The Clearwater Paper Corporation Annual Incentive Plan, dated effective as of January 1, 2014 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows:


Effective as of January 1, 2016, Section 2(t) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 
(t)        “Retirement” means the Participant’s termination of service for the Corporation on or after the earlier of his or her (A) attainment of age 65 or (B) attainment of age 55 and completion of 10 years of service for the Corporation.




Date:  5/5/2016                CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION






By:  /s/ Kari G. Moyes
Name:    Kari G. Moyes
Title:    Senior Vice President, Human Resources
# Council Decision of 25 November 2014 appointing a United Kingdom member of the Committee of the Regions (2014/859/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 25 November 2014

# appointing a United Kingdom member of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/859/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the United Kingdom Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)A member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Lord Graham TOPE CBE,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Ms Ruth DOMBEY, *Councillor*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

D. Franceschini                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO THE

CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION

RESTRICTED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT to the Agreement for the purchase of stock between Capstone Turbine Corporation
(the “Company”) and John Tucker (“Purchaser”), dated August 4, 2003, is made effective June 30,
2005.



RECITALS:




     WHEREAS, the Company granted to Purchaser on August 4, 2003 an award of its common stock
subject to the terms and restrictions stated in the Agreement, including terms for the payment of a
purchase for such common stock, and amended the Agreement effective January 31, 2005; and



     WHEREAS, the Company and Purchaser desire to clarify that the Agreement for vesting of the
restricted stock shares subject thereto in the event of a change in control of the Company is
intended to incorporate amendments that are made to the Company’s change in control benefit
programs;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following provision as a new
Section 4(e) to the Agreement:



     (e) The provisions of this Agreement regarding an “Acquisition” of the Company, as defined in
the Capstone Turbine Corporation Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, shall
automatically incorporate and be governed by any amendments that are made to such plan from time to
time.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer of the Company has executed this Amendment
pursuant to authorization from the Company and the Purchaser has set his hand hereto on the date
first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
By:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	John Tucker	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Its:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP on behalf Canadian Pacific Railway Company (WB471-9—August 8, 2005) for permission to use certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of the request may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration. 

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9. 

*Contact:*                     Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541.                 

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-17225 Filed 8-29-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 19 (Monday, January 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 4913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1741]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4982]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Degas Sculptures''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Degas Sculptures'', imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners. I also determine that the exhibition or display of 
the exhibit objects at the Milwaukee Art Museum, from on or about 
February 19, 2005, until on or about June 5, 2005, and at possible 
additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. 
Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Richard Lahne, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
453-8058). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: January 21, 2005.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-1741 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. COA06-1470.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS24744).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Mark BLEVINS d/b/a Rainbow Recycling, Petitioner v. TOWN OF WEST JEFFERSON and Town of West Jefferson Board of Adjustment, Respondents.

No. 210A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 12, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 643 S.E.2d 465 (2007), dismissing respondents' appeal from an order entered 26 April 2006 by Judge Michael E. Helms in Superior Court, Ashe County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 September 2007.

Kilby & Hurley Attorneys at Law, by John T. Kilby, West Jefferson, for petitioner-appellee.

Vannoy & Reeves, PLLC, by Jimmy D. Reeves and John Benjamin "Jak" Reeves, West Jefferson, for respondent-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this case is remanded to that court to address the merits of the appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

650 

CA 11-00301 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

CITY OF SYRACUSE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

WILLIAM OSUCHOWSKI, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

 

JUANITA PEREZ WILLIAMS, CORPORATION COUNSEL, SYRACUSE (NANCY J. LARSON

OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

ZIMMER LAW OFFICE, PLLC, SYRACUSE (KIMBERLY M. ZIMMER OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (William D.

Walsh, J.), entered April 8, 2010. The order affirmed orders of the

Syracuse City Court (James H. Cecile, J.), entered May 7, 2008 and

October 20, 2008, which, inter alia, granted the petitions in part. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at County Court.

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3243 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow expenses relating 

to all home schools to be qualified education expenses for purposes 

of a Coverdell education savings account. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10 (legislative day, JULY 9), 2008 

Mr. VITTER (for himself and Mr. DEMINT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow expenses relating to all home schools to be qualified education expenses for purposes of a Coverdell education 

savings account. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALLOWANCE OF HOME SCHOOL EXPENSES AS 

4 QUALIFIED EDUCATION EXPENSES FOR PUR5 POSES OF A COVERDELL EDUCATION SAV6 INGS ACCOUNT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 530(b) 

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to qualiVerDate Aug 31 2005 07:31 Jul 11, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3243.IS S3243

erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3243 IS

1 fied elementary and secondary education expenses) is 

2 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara3 graph: 

4 ‘‘(C) PRIVATE SCHOOL.—For purposes of 

5 this section, the term ‘private school’ includes 

6 any home school that meets the requirements of 

7 State law applicable to such home schools, 

8 whether or not such school is deemed a private 

9 school for purposes of State law.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 2007. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Reginald O. HORTON.

No. 108P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Reginald O. Horton, pro se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd day of February 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Moore County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
# Council Decision of 8 September 2014 appointing a Maltese member of the European Economic and Social Committee (2014/650/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 8 September 2014

# appointing a Maltese member of the European Economic and Social Committee

# (2014/650/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Maltese Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and                              Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015(1).

(2)A member's seaton the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of                              Mr Michael PARNIS,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Charles VELLA is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current                     term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 12

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Quarter Ended  Quarter Ended
                                                                        March 31,      March 31,
                                                                          2001          2002
                                                                     -------------  -------------
                                                                            (in thousands)
<S>                                                                  <C>            <C>
    Net loss .....................................................      $(4,198)      $(1,450)
    Add fixed charges:
      Interest costs  including  amortization  of debt issuance
        cost, discount on notes payable and fresh-start adjustment        4,402         3,591
                                                                        -------       -------

    Earnings before fixed charges ................................      $   204       $ 2,141

    Fixed charges:
      Interest costs  including  amortization  of debt issuance
       cost, discount on notes payable and fresh-start adjustment         4,402         3,591
                                                                        -------       -------
    Total fixed charges ..........................................      $ 4,402       $ 3,591
                                                                        -------       -------

    Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges ................      $(4,198)      $(1,450)
                                                                        =======       =======
</TABLE>



                                       28
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund VIII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the
General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | May 13, 2010           



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | May 13, 2010
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Covad Communications Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan Crawford, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act OF 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. COVAD COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.By:
    /s/ Christopher DunnChristopher DunnDate: March 1, 2006
    
    Senior Vice President and
 Chief Financial Officer
** * AMENDED CLD
- 125 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 2 3

- 1334

___________ IN RE: VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI , Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the Board of Immigration Appeals (Related to Agency No. A096

- 689

- 764 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

April 13, 2023 Before: GREENAWAY, J R. , MATEY, and FREEMAN , C ircuit Judges

(Opinion filed : June 2, 2023 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM Petitioner, Vamsidhar Reddy Vurimindi , is a native of India who became a lawful permanent resident in 2008. In 2017, an Immigration Judge determined that he was

remo vable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i) for having been convicted of a crime of stalking. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) agreed, but, upon review, we

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

determined that Vurimindi’s offense of conviction do es not qualify as a removable offense. Vurimindi v. Att ’ y Gen. , 46 F. 4th 134, 148 (3d Cir. 2022). Accordingly, we vacated the BIA’s orders affirming the removal order and remanded the matter to the agency for further proceedings

. In February 2023, Vur imindi filed a second petition for a writ of mandamus in this Court, again complaining that the BIA is “dilly

- dallying” in granting his motion to
terminate. By order entered April 20, 2023, the BIA terminated the proceedings without prejudice. Accordingl y, we will dismiss the mandamus petition as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690, 698

– 99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff ’ s personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”). 1

1 Vurimindi’s request to convert his mandamus petition to a petition for review and all other requests for relief are denied.
IN RE D.J.R.

No. COA07-117.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 17, 2007.

Certification Date August 6, 2007.

Appeal from Stanly (05JA68).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. DAVIDSON COUNTY.

No. COA06-1137.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Davidson (06CVS593).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements for Tanisys Technology,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the third fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,208,278
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,803,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                   226,026
<INVENTORY>                                    345,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,484,136
<PP&E>                                         340,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                 922,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,878,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,647,942
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    37,346,429
<OTHER-SE>                                (36,118,743)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,878,399
<SALES>                                      6,491,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,491,882
<CGS>                                        2,259,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,259,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,009,517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             223,485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,410,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,160,506
<DISCONTINUED>                                 250,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,410,506
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>