alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6341

In Re: JAMES M. DEBARDELEBEN,

 Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-83-50)

Submitted: June 8, 2005 Decided: June 21, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James M. DeBardeleben, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James M. DeBardeleben petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging the district court has improperly refused to file his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court

directing the district court to file his motion. Our review of the

docket sheet reveals that the district court filed DeBardeleben’s

motion and issued a final order dismissing the motion as

successive. DeBardeleben v. United States, No. 3:05-cv-00176

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2005). Accordingly, because the district court

has taken the action DeBardeleben seeks, we deny the mandamus

petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1422/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1422/2013 of 18 December 2013 publishing, for 2014, the agricultural product nomenclature            for export refunds introduced by Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1422/2013                     

# of 18 December 2013

# publishing, for 2014, the agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds introduced by Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 of 17 December 1987 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature                           for export refunds(2), and in particular the fourth paragraph of Article 3 thereof,                        

Whereas:

The full version of the refund nomenclature valid at 1 January 2014, as it ensues from the regulatory provisions on export                           arrangements for agricultural products, should be published,                        

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 is amended as follows:

Annex I is replaced by the text in Annex I to this Regulation.

Annex II is replaced by the text in Annex II to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union.*                   

It shall apply from 1 January 2014 and expire on 31 December 2014.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

## ANNEX IU.K.

### “ANNEX I**AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT NOMENCLATURE FOR EXPORT REFUNDS**

#### CONTENTS

#### 1.**Cereals and wheat or rye flour, groats or meal**U.K.

#### 2.**Rice and broken rice**U.K.

#### 3.**Products processed from cereals**U.K.

#### 4.**Cereal-based compound feedingstuffs**U.K.

#### 5.**Beef and veal**U.K.

#### 6.**Pigmeat**U.K.

#### 7.**Poultrymeat**U.K.

#### 8.**Eggs**U.K.

#### 9.**Milk and milk products**U.K.

#### 10.**White and raw sugar without further processing**U.K.

#### 11.**Syrups and other sugar products**U.K.

## ANNEX IIU.K.

### “ANNEX II

#### **Destination codes for export refunds**

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1.
COUNTY OF DURHAM v. AREC 3, LLC, et al.

No. 427P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 8, 2007.

Jay Ferguson, Durham, Richard Bydee, for AREC 3, LLC.

Marie Inserra, for County of Durham.

Richard Weintraub, for City of Durham.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of August 2007 by Petitioner (Worth L. Hill, Sheriff of Durham County) for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of October 2007."
1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3757

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Ramiro Cabrera Basurto, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 26, 2003 Filed: July 1, 2003 (Corrected: 07/08/03)

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ramiro Cabrera Basurto pleaded guilty to distributing 50 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B). The district court 1 sentenced him to 46 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Basurto has not filed a supplemental brief.-2- Counsel argues that Basurto’s sentence was unreasonable considering his crime, and that a supervised release condition requiring Basurto to report to a probation office upon reentering the United States violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. As neither of these arguments was raised below, our review is for plain error. See United States v. Sun Bear , 307 F.3d 747, 750 (8th Cir. 2002), cert. denied , 71 U.S.L.W. 3758 (U.S. June 9, 2003) (No. 02-9418). We reject counsel’s first argument because Basurto was sentenced within the Guidelines range corresponding to the Guidelines calculations to which he stipulated in his plea agreement. See United States v. Nguyen , 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995) (defendant who explicitly and voluntarily exposes himself to specific sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal). Nor did the court plainly err in imposing the supervised release condition. See United States v. Calles-Abrego , 52 Fed. Appx. 320, 321 (8th Cir. Dec. 12, 2002) (unpublished per curiam) (finding no plain error in imposition of same condition). Having carefully reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
SKISLAK v. IMPERIAL GOURMET BUFFET, L.L.C.

No. COA06-1017.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (04CVS7100).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Russell Harman WHITE.

No. 384P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for White.

Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 646 S.E.2d 609.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of August 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
Martin Andrew OAKES v. LINCOLN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Lincoln County Board of Education, Lincoln County Board of Commissioners.

No. 61P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 23, 2007.

Martin Andrew Oakes, Pro Se.

K. Dean Shatley, II, Asheville, Jeffrey Taylor, Lincolnton, for Lincoln Co. Bd. of Education.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st day of February 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of May 2007."

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 1st day of February 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of May 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 1st day of February 2007 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of May 2007."
STATE v. Myron T. FARRAR.

No. 320P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of May 2007 by Defendant for Leave to Proceed as Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
EXHIBIT 11



                                     ALCOHOL SENSORS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
                                        COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                                                 (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   Three Months Ended               Nine Months Ended
                                                      September 30,                   September 30,
                                               --------------------------    ------------------------------
                                                  1995           1996              1995          1996
                                                  ----           ----              ----          ----
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>
Net (loss) .............................       $  (727,457)    $ (906,601)    $(1,379,736)    $(3,269,701)
                                               ===========     ===========    ============    ============

Shares:
Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding...................         6,636,000      8,545,757       6,626,000       8,319,093
Add common stock equivalents issued
   within twelve months of an initial
   public offering (determined by the
   "treasury stock" method)(1)..........                --             --         367,000              --
Shares contributed in connection
   with the initial public offering.....        (1,000,000)            --      (1,000,000)             --
                                              ------------    ------------    -----------     ------------
           TOTAL........................         5,636,000      8,545,757       5,993,000       8,319,093
                                              ============    ============    ===========     ============


(Loss) per common share                              $(.13)         $(.11)          $(.23)          $(.39)
                                              ============    ============    ===========     ============






</TABLE>







------------------
(1)    In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission requirements,
       common shares, options and warrants issued during the twelve-month
       period prior to the filing of the initial public offering have been
       included in the calculation as if they were outstanding for all periods
       through June 30, 1995 applying the treasury stock method.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jesse Lee BRAXTON.

No. 259P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Raleigh, for Braxton.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 643 S.E.2d 637.

*5*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th day of June 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
# Commission Implementing Decision of 23 July 2014 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within            the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Well and Raju) (notified under document C(2014) 5082) (2014/497/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 23 July 2014

# as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of *Xylella fastidiosa* (Well and Raju)                     

# *(notified under document C(2014) 5082)*

# (2014/497/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 of 18 May 2015 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the                                 spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) (notified under document C(2015) 3415).
**Exhibit 11**

**PAULAFINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**Computationof Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share**

(In thousands, except per share data)
| ** **                                                                    | ** ** | **Six Months Ended** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                                    | ** ** | **June 30,**              | ** ** |
| ** **                                                                    | ** ** | **2006**                       | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** |
|                                                                          |       |                           |       |   |   |
| Net income                                                                    |       | $                              | 1,076      |   | $ | 934 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                           |       |   |   |
| Weighted average shares  outstanding for calculating basic earnings per share |       | 6,493,036                      |       | 6,587,050 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                           |       |   |   |
| Options                                                                       |       | 221,631                        |       | 218,285 |   |
| Unvested restricted  shares                                                   |       | 12,230                         |       | — |   |
| Total shares for  calculating diluted earnings per share                      |       | 6,726,897                      |       | 6,805,335 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                           |       |   |   |
| Basic earnings per share                                                      |       | $                              | 0.17       |   | $ | 0.14 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                           |       |   |   |
| Diluted earnings per share                                                    |       | $                              | 0.16       |   | $ | 0.14 |   |

 

1

----
APPLICANT: SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON APPLICATION NO. WR-77.138-29

APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ACTION TAKEN

REMAND FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING.

JUDGE

¥////sDATE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPANY'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MARCH 29 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                              74
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,048)
<INVENTORY>                                     32,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,601
<PP&E>                                          15,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,395)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,683
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,773
<SALES>                                         51,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,441
<CGS>                                           33,727
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,055
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    573
<INCOME-TAX>                                       252
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended August 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   1,182,840
<SECURITIES>                                               431,340
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1,492,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         3,174,846
<PP&E>                                                   2,347,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (1,421,853)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           4,532,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,325,305
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                     80
<COMMON>                                                   136,693
<OTHER-SE>                                               1,870,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             4,532,065
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         1,016,001
<CGS>                                                      955,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            1,848,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            19,887
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          (2,077)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (813,102)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           (221,929)
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (1,035,031)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.08)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CYBERIA HOLDINGS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                       258,267
<SECURITIES>                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                374,153
<ALLOWANCES>                 0
<INVENTORY>                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             695,685
<PP&E>                       374,670
<DEPRECIATION>               165,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               946,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        313,943
<BONDS>                      0
<COMMON>                     3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>        0
<PREFERRED>                  0
<OTHER-SE>                   431,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 949,091
<SALES>                      1,101,443
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             1,101,443
<CGS>                        85,137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                85,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             617,411
<LOSS-PROVISION>             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           (5,460)
<INCOME-PRETAX>              394,998
<INCOME-TAX>                 130,981
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          264,017
<DISCONTINUED>               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>              0
<CHANGES>                    0
<NET-INCOME>                 222,463
<EPS-BASIC>                .007
<EPS-DILUTED>                .007



</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Juhahn Ra-Heen BELCHER.

No. 306P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

William D. Spence, Kinston, for Belcher.

John C. Evans, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of July 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."