alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1513 

IN RE: KATHLEEN BARBARA DAVIS,

Debtor,

----------------------------------------

JULIAN BURKE; BURKE DUNWELL CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

versus

KATHLEEN BARBARA DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant,

MERRILL COHEN,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-04-2015-8-AW; BK-02-24578; AP-03-1132)

Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 5, 2005

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Kathleen Barbara Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Mitchell

Orenstein, GOREN, WOLFF & ORENSTEIN, L.L.C., Rockville, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Kathleen Barbara Davis appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion to reconsider a prior order dismissing her

appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order determining that a certain

debt was non-dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A)

(2000). Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion

discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Burke v. Davis, Nos. CA04-2015-8-AW; BK-02-24578; AP-03-1132 (D. Md. Apr. 4, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|November 14, 2005         
|                          
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|November 14, 2005
Mark Miller
                               Terms of Employment
                                December 7, 1999


Position:  Senior Vice President and CFO

Employment Status: Employee at will. These terms shall continue in force year to
year until altered by mutual agreement or termination of employment.

Base  Salary:  Participation  in Company  wide bonus pool that  provides a bonus
potential of 50% of annual base salary, consistent with the terms of the Company
wide program.

Options:          Option grant as approved by the board on January 27, 2000

Severance:        Upon  termination  of employment  for any reason,  a severance
                  payment  equal to (1) one  year's  base  salary,  plus (2) one
                  year's full potential bonus amount outlined above. Upon change
                  of control and termination of employment  either  voluntary or
                  involuntary  within 1 year of a change of control - defined as
                  Leslie Otten ownership going  below 20% - 2 year's base salary
                  and bonus potential.

Benefits:         Participation  in  ASC  senior  executive  benefit  plan as in
                  effect from time to time.

FY99 Bonus:       FY 1999 bonus of $45,000 - total potential was $100,000. To be
                  paid immediately.
# L_2015115DE.01004301.xml

| 6.5.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 115/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 115/43

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 576/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 12. Juni 2013 über die Verbringung von Heimtieren zu anderen als Handelszwecken und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 998/2003

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 178 vom 28. Juni 2013
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 178 vom 28. Juni 2013

Auf Seite 1, Anhang I „Heimtierarten“, Teil B, 2. Eintrag:

anstatt:

„Zu Zierzwecken gehaltene Wassertiere gemäß der Definition in Artikel 3 Buchstabe k der Richtlinie 2006/88/EG, die nicht nach Artikel 2 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a dieser Richtlinie von ihr ausgenommen sind“

muss es heißen:

„Zu Zierzwecken gehaltene Wassertiere gemäß der Definition in Artikel 3 Buchstabe k der Richtlinie 2006/88/EG, die nach Artikel 2 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a dieser Richtlinie von ihr ausgenommen sind“

.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ImproveNet, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the year period ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") I, Homayoon J. Farsi, Co-Chairman, President, and Acting Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or
     78o(d)): and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


ImproveNet, Inc.


/s/ Homayoon J. Farsi
---------------------------
Homayoon J. Farsi
Co-Chairman, President, and Acting
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: April 14, 2004
(LOGO)

March 20, 1998

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. (338)
Tim Knight
11000 Brokenland Parkway
Columbia, MD 21004-3562


ADVANTA
MORTGAGE
P.O. BOX 509011
SAN DIEGO, CA 92150-9011

16875 WEST BERNARDO DRIVE 
SAN DIEGO. CA 92127
(619) 674-1800


RE: ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


Pursuant to that certain LOAN SERVICING AGREEMENT  ("Agreement")  dated as of
June 1, 1997, SOUTHERN PACIFIC SECURED ASSETS CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES  SERIES  1997-2,  I, William P. Garland,  hereby certify that (I) a
review of the  activities  of the  Servicer  during the  preceding  year and the
performance under this Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (II) to
the best of my knowledge,  based on such review,  the Servicer has fulfilled all
its obligations under this Agreement for such year.


Sincerely,

/s/William P. Garland
William P. Garland
Sr. Vice President, Loan Service




WPG/cg
cc: Mr. James L. Shreero
     Annette Aguirre, Esq. 
     Mr. Mark Casale
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Transgenomic, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, I, Brett L. Frevert, Chief Financial Officer of Transgenomic, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





(1)
such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Transgenomic, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Transgenomic, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Transgenomic, Inc.





/s/     BRETT L. FREVERTBrett L. Frevert

Chief Financial Officer





Date: October 21, 2011




A signed original of the certification required by Section 906 has been provided to Transgenomic, Inc. and will be retained by Transgenomic, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Joan Myrtle SHANNON.

No. 177A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina, Twelfth District.

June 27, 2007.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Shannon.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 642 S.E.2d 516.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 16th day of April 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."

*894Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Attorney General on the 16th day of April 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."

Accordingly, the new brief of the Attorney General shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
Exhibit 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-35199, 333-36473, and 333-47523 of Fred Meyer, Inc., all on Form S-8, and
Registration Statement Nos. 333-44537, 333-46835, and 333-56637 of Fred Meyer,
Inc. on Form S-3, of our report dated March 10, 1999, included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Fred Meyer, Inc. for the year ended January 30, 1999.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Portland, Oregon
April 14, 1999
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROY E. TERRELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-0575

[April 3, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Robert B. Meadows, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312018CF001157A.

Carol Stafford Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

GROSS, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
In the Matter of S.M.S. appealed by Mother.

No. 247P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Winifred H. Dillon, Raleigh, for Mother.

Joyce L. Terres, Greensboro, Jeffrey L. Jenkins, for Halifax County DSS.

Christopher G. Daniel, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of May 2007 by Respondent (Mother) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1997 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,320
<SECURITIES>                                     8,668
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,699
<PP&E>                                         138,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,076
<BONDS>                                         32,655
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,473
<SALES>                                          9,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,244
<CGS>                                            5,692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,707
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    805
<INCOME-TAX>                                       141
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                664
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       664
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
VOGLER v. BRANCH ERECTIONS CO.

No. 128A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 23, 2007.

Christopher J. Blake, Leslie Lane Mize, Raleigh, for NC Ins. Guaranty Asso.

J. Randolph Ward, Cary, for Branch Erections Co.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of April 2007 by Defendant (NCIGA) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (NCIGA) shall have up to and including 30 days after the Court's decision as to Branch Erection's Petition for Discretionary Review to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of April 2007."
Mickey PLOTT, Employee v. BOJANGLE'S RESTAURANTS, INC., Employer, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania c/o AIG Claim Services, Carrier.

No. 55A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 12, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 181 N.C.App. 61, 638 S.E.2d 571 (2007), reversing and remanding an opinion and award filed on 8 July 2005 by the North Carolina Industrial Commission. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 September 2007.

Raymond M. Marshall and Jay A. Gervasi, Jr., Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.

Robinson & Lawing, L.L.P., by Jolinda J. Babcock, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit





	
			
	
	 
	Daniel S. Glaser
President and Chief Executive Officer
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
1166 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
212 345 4874 Fax 212 345 6676
dan.glaser@mmc.com
www.mmc.com














Exhibit 10.4




Julio A. Portalatin
[Address]
[City, State Zip Code]


Subject:    Terms of Employment


Dear Julio:


This second amendment to the Letter Agreement, dated November 21, 2013, between you and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (the “Initial Letter Agreement”), as amended on June 6, 2014 (the “First Amendment” and, together with the Initial Letter Agreement, the “Letter Agreement”) revises the terms and conditions of your employment by Mercer Consulting Group, Inc.  The Letter Agreement will continue to govern your employment except as specified below:  


		
	1.
	Exhibit A to the Letter Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the attached Exhibit A.




The terms of this second amendment are effective as of May 18, 2016.  Please acknowledge your agreement with the terms of the Letter Agreement, as amended by this second amendment, by signing and dating the enclosed copy and returning it to me on or before June 24, 2016.


Sincerely,




/s/ Daniel S. Glaser
Daniel S. Glaser
President and Chief Executive Officer
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.




Accepted and Agreed:




/s/ Julio A. Portalatin
(Signature)                




06/24/16
(Date) 







June 10, 2016
Julio A. Portalatin
Page 2









Exhibit A


	
		
	Board or Committee Memberships
	Hofstra University Board of Trustees

	Annual Base Salary
	$900,000

	Annual Target Bonus Opportunity
	Bonus awards are discretionary.  Target bonus of $1,800,000 commencing with the 2016 performance year (awarded in 2017).  Actual bonus may range from 0% - 200% of target, based on achievement of individual performance objectives, Mercer’s performance and/or Marsh & McLennan Companies’ performance as Marsh & McLennan Companies may establish from time to time.  

	Annual Target Long Term Incentive Opportunity
	Long-term incentive awards are discretionary.  Target award of $2,500,000 (based on grant date fair value), commencing with the award made in 2017.
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Dril-Quip, Inc. 

Houston, Texas 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-118876), Form S-8 (No. 222-68976), Form S-8 (No. 333-47453), Form S-3 (No. 333-128989) of our reports dated February 28, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectivenessof Dril-Quip, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),“Share-Based Payment”, effective January 1, 2006. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Houston, Texas 

February 28, 2008
IN RE N.L.

No. COA06-1094.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05JT1027).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-51283

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HEATHER LYNN GANTT,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:12-CR-76-3

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Heather Lynn Gantt, federal prisoner # 00535-380, 

appeals the denial of her motion for concurrent sentencing. Her claims pertain 

to the manner in which her federal sentence was calculated and is being 

enforced, so they arise under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Pack v. Yusuff, 218 F.3d 

448, 451 (5th Cir. 2000). Gantt is not incarcerated in the Western District of 

Texas, so the district court lacked jurisdiction over any of her § 2241 claims. 

See id. The district court’s order is AFFIRMED. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 30, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-51283 Document: 00514255196 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2017
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3471 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3471

   To prohibit government-sponsored enterprises from making lobbying 
 expenditures, political contributions, or other certain contributions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2008

   Mr. DeMint (for himself, Mrs. Dole, and Mr. Thune) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit government-sponsored enterprises from making lobbying 
 expenditures, political contributions, or other certain contributions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON LOBBYING, POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS, AND 
              CONTRIBUTIONS TO NONPROFIT PUBLIC POLICY ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) Prohibition on Lobbying Expenditures and Certain 
Contributions.--An enterprise may not make--
            (1) lobbying expenditures;
            (2) political contributions; or
            (3) contributions to any organization described under 
        section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    (b) Definition.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``enterprise'' shall have the same meaning 
        given such term in section 1303 of the Federal Housing 
        Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 
        U.S.C. 4502);
            (2) the term ``lobbying expenditures'' shall have the same 
        meaning given such term in section 4911(c)(1) of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986; and
            (3) the term ``political contributions'' means any 
        contribution on behalf of a political candidate or to a 
        separate segregated fund described in section 316(b)(2)(C) of 
        the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
        441b(b)(2)(C)).
    (c) Penalties.--Violations of this section shall constitute 
violations of section 1352(a) of title 31, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 3(ii)(c)

                                ALLIN CORPORATION

                               Amendment to Bylaws

      Concurrently with the issuance of the Series G Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock of Allin Corporation and related warrants to purchase shares of
common stock of Allin Corporation, Section 2.7 of Allin Corporation's Bylaws
were amended and restated as follows:

            "Section 2.7. Voting. Unless otherwise provided by the Delaware
      General Corporation Law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws,
      each stockholder shall be entitled to one vote, in person or by written
      proxy, for each share held of record by such stockholder who is entitled
      to vote generally in the election of directors. All elections for the
      Board of Directors shall be decided by a plurality of the votes cast and
      all other questions shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast,
      except as otherwise required by the Delaware General Corporation Law or as
      provided for in the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws."