alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------




                        CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE><CAPTION>

                                                                    Year ended December 31,
                                                   --------------------------------------------------------
                                                      2000                   1999                   1998
                                                   ----------             ----------             ----------
<S>                                                <C>                    <C>                    <C>

CANADIAN GAAP
-------------
Net loss for the year                             $ 3,072,656            $ 9,669,951            $(8,673,172)
Weighted average number of common shares o/s
  for the year                                     35,753,783              9,564,501             22,952,233
Loss per share is net loss divided by
  weighted average # o/s                          $     (0.09)           $     (0.36)           $     (0.38)


US GAAP
-------
Net loss for the year                             $ 3,072,656            $ 9,669,951            $(8,756,755)
Weighted average number of common shares o/s
  during the year                                  35,753,783             27,093,742             22,952,233
Loss per share is net loss divided by
  weighted average # o/s                          $     (0.09)           $     (0.36)           $     (0.38)
Pro-forma loss for the year                       $ 3,072,656           $(10,524,171)           $(8,965,696)
Pro-forma loss per share is pro-forma loss
  divided by weighted average # o/s               $     (0.09)           $     (0.39)           $     (0.39)
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929299
<NAME>                        ISOLYSER COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              15,155
<SECURITIES>                                         4,489
<RECEIVABLES>                                       15,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                           863
<INVENTORY>                                         22,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    58,759
<PP&E>                                              21,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                      13,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      94,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               11,688
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                                42
<OTHER-SE>                                          76,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        94,637
<SALES>                                             13,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    14,015
<CGS>                                                7,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        7,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         43
<INCOME-TAX>                                            41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      2
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             2
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 193/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 193/2013 of 6 March 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 193/2013                     

# of 6 March 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T NOVEMB ER 8, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 14 87 8 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 8 :0 9- cr-0 04 43 -SCB -AEP-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l l Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us BILLY JACK COUR TRIGHT, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (No ve m be r 8, 2 01 1) Befo re HULL, PRYOR an d KRAVITC H, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM:Ray C. L op ez, ap po in te d c ou ns el forBil ly JackCo urtri gh t, h as fil eda

m ot io n t o wi th dr aw on ap pe al , supp orte d b y a br ie f pr ep aredpu rs uantto Ander s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de nt rev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s tha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t of th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re re co rd rev eal s n o i ss ue s o f arg uabl e m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED, an d C ou rtr ig ht ’s con vi ct io n a ndsen te nc e is AFFIRMED.

2
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00125

- CV

SANDERSON FARMS, INC . (PROCESSING DIVISI ON)

, Appellant

v.

GERALD W. WATSON

, Appellee

From the 414th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010

- 3000

- 5

ORDER

This appeal was referred to mediation by order dated July 23 , 2015. Mediation

was ordered to occur within 30 days. We have received an Unopposed Motion to

Extend Time for Mandatory Mediation from appellant informing the Court that

appellant’s attorney would be out of town until August 28, 2015 and that t he next

availab le dates for mediation after August 28, 2015 would be October 20, 2015 and

October 21, 2015. Appellant’s unopposed motion is granted. Accordingly, mediation

must occur by October 30, 2015.

PER CURIAMSanderson Farms, Inc. v. Watson Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed August 20, 2015
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

LEVONNIE WOOTEN, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 23-0294 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 94-003150

The Honorable Lisa Ann Vandenberg, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Christine Davis

Counsel for Respondent

Barton & Storts, Tucson

By Brick P. Storts, III

Counsel for Petitioner

FILED 1-25-2024
STATE v. WOOTEN

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Andrew M. Jacobs, and Judge 

Angela K. Paton delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Levonnie Wooten seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is his fifth

petition. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing 

abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, the petition for 

review, the state’s response and petitioner’s reply. We find that petitioner 

has not established an abuse of discretion. 

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1




PEBBLEBROOK HOTEL TRUST


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
PEBBLEBROOK HOTEL TRUST 2009 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN,
AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JULY 10, 2012


This Amendment No. 1 to the Pebblebrook Hotel Trust 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective July 10, 2012 (the “Plan”), is adopted by the Board of Trustees of Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (the “Company”) on April 26, 2016, to be effective immediately upon approval of the Plan by the Company’s shareholders.


1.  Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Plan.


2.  Section 5.02(a) of the Plan is hereby modified as follows:


“The maximum aggregate number of Common Shares that may be issued under this Plan pursuant to the exercise of Options and SARs, the grant of Share Awards or Other Equity-Based Awards and the settlement of Performance Units and Incentive Awards is 2,422,6253,672,625 Common Shares.  Other Equity-Based Awards that are LTIP Units shall reduce the maximum aggregate number of Common Shares that may be issued under this Plan on a one-for-one basis, i.e., each such unit shall be treated as an award of Common Shares.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  309,903
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,641
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               335,258
<PP&E>                                         294,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 964,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          250,130
<BONDS>                                         50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     230,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   964,155
<SALES>                                         39,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,382
<CGS>                                           51,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,284,805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (438,576)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (438,576)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (438,576)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
VECELLIO & GROGAN, INC. v. PIEDMONT DRILLING & BLASTING, INC., and Ranger Insurance Company.

No. 268P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Robert C. deRosset, Walter E. Brock, Jr., Jay P. Tobin, Elinor M. Johnsey, Raleigh, for Piedmont Drilling.

Charles C. Meeker, Brian D. Darer, Raleigh, for Vecellio & Grogan, Inc.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 644 S.E.2d 16.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 13th day of June 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
BROWN v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP.

No. COA06-1044.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Watauga (04CVS723).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      12,551,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  724,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (111,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,758,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    300,000
<COMMON>                                       100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,124,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,758,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,430,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,378,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,981,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             233,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,838,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,838,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,838,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
         

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001019779
<NAME> CUNO, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,706
<INVENTORY>                                     29,246
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,249
<PP&E>                                         117,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,940
<BONDS>                                          8,761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,342
<SALES>                                        220,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,584
<CGS>                                          124,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                72,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   588
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,943
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,831
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,831
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91


</TABLE>
STATE v. Kermedis JACOBS.

No. 122P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of May 2006 by Petitioner for "Petition for Writ of Certiorari":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2006."
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, AT HOUSTON

No. 14

- 15

- 00241

- CV

Lisa Priymak and Gareguin Step

v.

Kroger Co.

(No. 2014

- 19634 IN 333RD DISTR ICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

CLK RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING $250.00
$175.00 $20.00 06/19/2015

04/14/2015

04/14/2015 PAID

PAID

PAID ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals Housto n, Texas

are $445.00

.

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK OF THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH D ISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Fo urteenth District of Texas, December 3, 2015

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Aegis Realty, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements                                          
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001043324         
<NAME>                        Aegis Realty, Inc. 
<MULTIPLIER>                  1                  
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998   
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998 
<CASH>                                         3,003,474         
<SECURITIES>                                   0                 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,173,948         
<ALLOWANCES>                                   383,000           
<INVENTORY>                                    0                 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,235,742         
<PP&E>                                         194,144,910       
<DEPRECIATION>                                 19,268,330        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,389,970       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,538,468         
<BONDS>                                        58,864,099        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                 
<PREFERRED>                                    0                 
<COMMON>                                       0                 
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,183,508       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   195,389,970       
<SALES>                                        0                 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,504,803        
<CGS>                                          0                 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0                 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               11,706,189        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,931,874         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,646,633         
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0                 
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                 
<CHANGES>                                      0                 
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,646,633         
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .83               
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .82               
                                               


</TABLE>