alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23(a)

| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-149365) of Centerline Holding      Company,                                                                                               |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-3ASR No. 333-138706) of Centerline      Holding Company,                                                                                            |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-3ASR No. 333-133118) of Centerline      Holding Company,                                                                                            |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-11 No. 333-126044) of Centerline      Holding Company,                                                                                              |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-3MEF No. 333-117650) of Centerline      Holding Company,                                                                                            |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 333-120077) of Centerline      Holding Company,                                                                                             |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-8 and its post effective amendment on      Form S-8/A No. 333-55957) pertaining to the Centerline Holding Company      Incentive Share Option Plan, |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-54802) of Centerline Holding      Company,                                                                                                |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-109078) of Centerline Holding      Company,                                                                                               |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 333-74988) of Centerline      Holding Company,                                                                                              |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 333-57384) of Centerline      Holding Company,                                                                                              |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-110722) of Centerline Holding      Company,                                                                                               |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-3/A and its post effective amendment on      Form POS AM 1 No. 333-111919) of Centerline Holding    Company,                                        |
| * | in      the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-149365) of Centerline Holding      Company,                                                                                               |
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF MRS. FIELDS' ORIGINAL COOKIES, INC.

The subsidiaries of Mrs. Fields' Original Cookies, Inc. and their respective state or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization are as follows:

|The Mrs. Fields' Brand, Inc.        |  | Delaware      
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Great American Cookie Company, Inc. |  | Delaware      
|Pretzelmaker, Inc.                  |  | Utah          
|Pretzelmaker Canada, Inc.           |  | Ontario       
|Pretzel Time, Inc.                  |  | Utah          
|Mrs. Fields Cookies (Canada) Ltd.   |  | Ontario       
|Mrs. Fields Cookies Australia, Inc. |  | Utah          
|H&M of Canada, Inc.                 |  | Ontario       
|U-VEST Company, LLC                 |  | Utah          
|LV-H&M, LLC                         |  | Nevada        
|Fairfield Foods, Inc.               |  | New Jersey    
|Airport Cookies, Inc.               |  | Ohio          
|Sunshine Pretzel Time, Inc.         |  | Florida       
|Peachtree Pretzel Time, Inc.        |  | Georgia       
|CMBC, Inc.                          |  | South Carolina

Each
of these subsidiaries does business under its respective corporate name.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,171,777
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  966,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,190
<INVENTORY>                                    919,785
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,284,852
<PP&E>                                       1,387,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                 656,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,300,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,816,436
<BONDS>                                      8,681,474
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,461,251
<COMMON>                                           279
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,400,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,300,930
<SALES>                                      4,352,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,475,718
<CGS>                                        2,306,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,306,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,381,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,220,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (17,064,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (1,166,463)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (18,680,470)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.69)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Yolanda Stuart, Respondent, v Jorge Stuart, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 644]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Mc-Elrath, J.), dated August 5, 2003, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Hickey, H.E.), dated April 21, 2003, which, after a hearing, denied, without prejudice, his application for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]). Prudenti, P.J., Crane, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
WESLEY LONG NURSING CENTER, INC. v. HARPER.

No. COA06-1706.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (06CVD3889).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE J.A.C.

No. COA07-515.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 16, 2007.

Certification Date November 5, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (05J280).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
In re D.B., C.B.

No. 590A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 14, 2008.

Elizabeth Kennedy-Gurnee, Fayetteville, for Cumberland County DSS.

Janet K. Ledbetter, Hillsborough, for Father.

Beth A. Hall, for Guardian ad Litem.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of January 2008 by Respondent (Mother) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Respondent (Mother) shall have up to and including the 13th day of February 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of January 2008."
EXHIBIT 15 - LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION






Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 10549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 3, 1999, on our reviews of interim
financial information of ITI Technologies, Inc. for the three and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 1999 and 1998, and included in the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, is
incorporated by reference in the registration statements of ITI Technologies,
Inc. on Form S-8 (Registrations Nos. 33-89826, 333-08943, 333-08945, 333-23751
and 333-58257).


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 8, 1999
Freida FOSTER, Tami Borland and Kathy Bowen v. Jason M. CRANDELL and PSIMED, P.A.

No. 73P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Jack B. Bayliss, Jr., William J. McMahon, IV, William J. McMahon, IV, Greensboro, for Crandell and PSIMED.

Angela N. Gray, for Foster, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 638 S.E.2d 526.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 6th day of February 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of February 2007 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
# Commission Implementing Decision of 4 December 2014 on the publication of the references of standard EN 15649-2:2009+A2:2013            for floating leisure articles for use on and in the water and of standard EN 957-6:2010+A1:2014 for stationary training equipment            in the Official Journal of the European Union pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council            (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/875/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 4 December 2014

# on the publication of the references of standard EN 15649-2:2009+A2:2013 for floating leisure articles for use on and in the                        water and of standard EN 957-6:2010+A1:2014 for stationary training equipment in the *Official Journal of the European Union* pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council                     

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2014/875/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1698 of 9 October 2019 on European standards for products drafted in support of                                 Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on general product safety (Text with EEA relevance).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING BALANCE SHEETS OF ORPHAN MEDICAL, INC. AS OF MARCH 31, 1997, AND
THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             3,608,747
<SECURITIES>                                      11,185,862
<RECEIVABLES>                                         33,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                          175,483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  15,158,305
<PP&E>                                               362,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                        96,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    15,424,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2,185,076
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              60,631
<OTHER-SE>                                        13,178,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      15,424,645
<SALES>                                              104,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     104,424
<CGS>                                                 43,696
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         43,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1,860,805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (211,294)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,588,783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,588,783)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,588,783)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.26)
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Walter O’Conner, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 166]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Francis A. Affronti, J.), rendered December 3, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

*1288Memorandum: On this appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [4]), defendant contends that he was effectively denied his right to counsel at a critical stage of the proceedings, i.e., at sentencing. We reject that contention. At no point was defense counsel relieved of his assignment, and defense counsel never “indicated that he did not intend to say anything with respect to” defendant’s sentencing *(People v Bell,*141 AD2d 749, 750 [1988]). Without consulting defense counsel, defendant rejected Supreme Court’s offer to permit him to withdraw his guilty plea, having been informed by the court that he faced the possibility of being sentenced as a persistent felony offender if convicted after trial. Defense counsel continued to participate in the sentencing proceedings, however, and further advised defendant concerning the right to appeal. Finally, “[defendant received the bargained-for sentence, and thus we reject his further contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe” *(People v Santiago,*1 AD3d 957, 957 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 601 [2004]; *see People v Candelario,*307 AD2d 771, 772 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 595 [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8, No. 333-42422, No. 333-89913,
No. 333-66767, No. 333-66769, No. 333-103314 and
No. 333-103315)
pertaining to the Tropical Sportswear Intl Corporation 2000 Long-Term Incentive
Plan; the Tropical Sportswear Intl Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan as
Amended and Restated; the Tropical Sportswear Intl Corporation Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan; the Apparel International Group, Inc. 1996 Stock
Option Plan; the Tropical Sportswear Int'l Corporation 2000 Long Term Incentive
Plan as Amended and the Tropical Sportswear Int'l Corporation Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan as Amended, of our report dated November 21, 2003 (except for Note 16, as to
which the date is January 12, 2004), with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Tropical Sportswear Intl Corporation included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 27, 2003.

| |  |                      
| |  | ---------------------
| |  |                      
| |  | -s- Ernst & Young LLP

Tampa, Florida
January 12, 2004
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.4

 
                  AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS OF WESTOWER CORPORATION

     Pursuant to Resolutions passed at a Special Meeting of Board of Directors
held in October 1997, Article III, Section 2 of the Bylaws of Westower
Corporation was amended to state as follows:

     "Section 2.  Number.  The number of directors of the corporation is six.
     The number of directors can be increased or decreased from time to time by
     the vote of the directors or shareholders to amend this Section 2, provided
     that the number of directors shall be not less than one, and provided
     further that no decrease shall shorten the term of any incumbent director."

________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                          Page 1
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3582 

To require continued application of budget neutrality on a national basis 

in calculation of the Medicare urban hospital wage floor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. DODD, and Mr. 

LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require continued application of budget neutrality on a 

national basis in calculation of the Medicare urban hospital wage floor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safeguarding Our Hos5 pitals’ Futures Act of 2008’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 3582 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUED APPLICATION OF BUDGET NEU2 TRALITY ON A NATIONAL BASIS IN CALCULA3 TION OF THE MEDICARE URBAN HOSPITAL 

4 WAGE FLOOR. 

5 In the case of discharges occurring on or after Octo6 ber 1, 2008, the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

7 shall continue to administer section 4410(b) of the Bal8 anced Budget Act of 1997 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww note) and 

9 section 412.64(e) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, 

10 in the same manner as the Secretary administered such 

11 sections for discharges occurring during fiscal year 2008 

12 (through a uniform, national adjustment to the area wage 

13 index). 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
STATE v. Moses Leon FAISON.

No. 576P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of December 2007 by Defendant for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of March 2008."
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Enviro Voraxial Technology, Inc. (File number 333-140929) of our report dated April 12, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Enviro Voraxial Technology, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, comprehensive (loss) income, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009, which report is included in this annual report on Form 10-K of Enviro Voraxial Technology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.




JEWETT SCHWARTZ WOLFE & ASSOCOCIATES




Hollywood, Florida


April 13, 2010
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3285 

To ensure that, for each small business participating in the 8(a) business 

development program that was affected by Hurricane Katrina of 2005 

or Hurricane Rita of 2005, the period in which it can participate is 

extended by 24 months. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2008 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To ensure that, for each small business participating in the 

8(a) business development program that was affected 

by Hurricane Katrina of 2005 or Hurricane Rita of 

2005, the period in which it can participate is extended 

by 24 months. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disadvantaged Busi5 ness Disaster Eligibility Act of 2008’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3285 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PARTICIPATION TERM FOR VICTIMS 

2 OF HURRICANE KATRINA OR HURRICANE 

3 RITA. 

4 (a) RETROACTIVITY.—If a small business concern 

5 (within the meaning given that term in section 3 of the 

6 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)), while participating 

7 in any program or activity under the authority of para8 graph (10) of section 7(j) of the Small Business Act (15 

9 U.S.C. 636(j)), was located in a parish or county described 

10 in subsection (b) of this section and was affected by Hurri11 cane Katrina of 2005 or Hurricane Rita of 2005, the pe12 riod during which that small business concern is permitted 

13 continuing participation and eligibility in that program or 

14 activity shall be extended for 24 months after the date 

15 such participation and eligibility would otherwise termi16 nate. 

17 (b) PARISHES AND COUNTIES COVERED.—Sub18 section (a) applies to any parish in the State of Louisiana, 

19 or any county in the State of Mississippi or in the State 

20 of Alabama, that has been designated by the Adminis21 trator of the Small Business Administration as a disaster 

22 area by reason of Hurricane Katrina of 2005 or Hurricane 

23 Rita of 2005 under disaster declaration 10176, 10177, 

24 10178, 10179, 10180, 10181, 10205, or 10206. 

25 (c) REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE.—The Administrator 

26 of the Small Business Administration shall ensure that the 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 3285 IS

1 case of every small business concern participating before 

2 the date of enactment of this Act in a program or activity 

3 covered by subsection (a) is reviewed and brought into 

4 compliance with this section. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS