alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Amendment to Employment Agreement 

This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to that certain Employment Agreement between Allison Transmission, Inc., a Delaware corporation (together
with any successor thereto, the “Company”), and Lawrence E. Dewey (the “Executive”) dated as of April 15, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”) is made as of May 11, 2016 (the
“Amendment Date”) by and among the Company and the Executive. Except as set forth in this Amendment, capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement. 

RECITAL 
 The Company and
the Executive mutually desire to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement as set forth herein. 
 AGREEMENT 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1.     Amendment to the Employment Agreement. Effective as of the Amendment Date, Section 1(c) of the
Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer” and replacing it with “Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.” 

2.     No Other Amendment. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain
unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect according to its terms. 
 3.     Entire Agreement. This
Amendment, together with the Employment Agreement (to the extent not amended hereby), represents the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall supersede any and all previous contracts, arrangements or
understandings between the parties. 
 4.     Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed, construed,
interpreted and enforced in accordance with its express terms, and otherwise in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of Indiana, without reference to the principles of conflicts of law of the State of Indiana or any other jurisdiction,
and where applicable, the laws of the United States. 
 5.     Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in
several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same document. 

[signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date and year first written
above. 
  

			
	COMPANY
		
	By:	 	/s/ Eric C. Scroggins
	Name:	 	Eric C. Scroggins
	Title:	 	Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	  /s/ Lawrence E. Dewey
	Lawrence E. Dewey


  
  
  

 
  
  

 
  
  

 
  
  

 
  
  

 
  
  

 
 [Signature Page to Dewey Employment Agreement Amendment]
# FILED
October 27, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

ANTHONY KEITH ELDRIDGE, ) C/A NO. 03A01-9904-CH-00146 ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) SULLIVAN COUNTY ) vs. ) ) JULIA EDITH ELDRIDGE, ) ) Defendant-Appellee. )

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N
The majority ’ s Judgment is wrong, because the Trial Judge is vested with wide or broad discretion in matters of child custody and parental visitation. See, e.g., Harwell v. Harwell, 612 S.W.2d 182 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980).

The majority ’ s judgment is wrong because the credibility of the witnesses is within the province of the trier of fact. See Bingham v. Dyersburg Fabrics Co., Inc. , 567 S.W.2d 169 (Tenn. 1978); Harwell & Rogers v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Ins. Co. , 612 S.W.2d 178 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980)

The majority ’ s judgment is wrong because the Trial Court ’ s findings are entitled to a presumption of correctness unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. T.R.A.P. Rule 13(d).

Apparently due to the acrimonious relationship of the parties, the Trial Judge

Page 1appointed a PhD licensed in psychology as a special master. The findings of the special

master are insightful. In commenting on the child ’ s best interest, the master observed:

Generally, it is in the best of children to have happy, communicative relationships with both parents, without interference. Denial of one ’ s parent, means denial of part of oneself, emotionally, in terms of ego, and genetically, and is not in a child ’ s own best interest. For one parent to deny the worth of the other parent causes difficulty for the child, and is not in her best interest. And in a subsequent finding in the continuing dispute between the parents, the master observed: Because of Taylor ’ s knowledge of and response to the family opinion, it is

important that Taylor continue overnight visits, to continue in her understanding that her mother is her mother, and not just a stereotype. I believe her mother Julia ’ s assertion that her daughter will see nothing inappropriate. Taylor just wants to be able to love who she loves. In situations such as this, we are admonished to be careful to avoid the appearance of punishing one or the other parent, since awards of custody are not to punish a parent. See Sutherland v. Sutherland, 831 S.W.2d 283 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). The evidence preponderates that the child has not been adversely impacted by her visitation with her mother. See Musselman v. Acuff , 826 S.W.2d 920 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). The burden was on the father to show that the visitation adversely affected the child. Essentially, his evidence was couched in homophobic opinions which lack probative value.

A review of the evidence in this record in accordance with the foregoing principles, demonstrates, in my view, that the majority has substituted its judgment for the Trial Court’ s judgment, which renders it wrong on the facts and on the law.

I dissent, and would affirm the Trial Court ’ s judgment in this case.

__________________________ Herschel P. Franks, J.

Page 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO  
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eden  Bioscience Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the  period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,  Rhett R. Atkins,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant  to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of  1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 4,
2006

| | /s/ Rhett R. Atkins                  
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | Rhett R. Atkins                      
| | President and Chief Executive Officer

- 24 -
EXHIBIT
      32.2








Certification


Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Roger G. Wilson,
      Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of Microtek Medical Holdings,
      Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of
      my knowledge, that:





This
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the
      “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in this Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








November
                7, 2007
            /s/
                Roger G. WilsonRoger
                G. WilsonChief
                Financial Officer, Treasurer and
                Secretary
# The Rights of Passengers in Bus and Coach Transport (Exemptions) Regulations 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

E+W+S

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 228

Road Traffic

# The Rights of Passengers in Bus and Coach Transport (Exemptions) Regulations 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

6th February 2013

Laid before Parliament

7th February 2013

Coming into force

1st March 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (19.8.2013) by The Rights of Passengers in Bus and Coach Transport (Exemptions and Enforcement) Regulations 2013 (S.I. 2013/1865), **reg. 3**
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Logility, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of Logility, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Logility, Inc.



|                    |  |  | 
|------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: July 24, 2003 |  |  | 
|                    |  |  | 



|                    |  |  | 
|------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: July 22, 2003 |  |  | 
|                    |  |  | 



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Logility, Inc. and will be retained by Logility, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Council Decision of 30 July 2014 appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee (2014/511/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 30 July 2014

# appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

# (2014/511/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and                              Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015(1).

(2)A member's seaton the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of                              Mr Claude ROLIN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Raymond COUMONT is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the                     current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.
CRAIG v. BOARD OF EDUCATION.

No. 484PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 2008.

David A. Nash, Wilmington, for Board of Education.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of November 2007 by Plaintiff to Convert "Petition for Discretionary Review" to a Notice of Appeal of Right:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of March 2008."
STATE v. Milton E. LANCASTER.

No. 161P07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2008.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Scott Thomas, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of January 2008 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of January 2008."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16786]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Establishment

    The Archivist of the United States has determined that the 
establishment of the Advisory Committee on Electronic Records Archives 
is necessary and is in the public interest in connection with the 
President's Management Agenda's e-government initiatives. This 
committee will comply with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2).
    This Committee shall advise the Archivist of the United States on 
technical, mission, and service issues related to the Electronic 
Records Archives (ERA). It will advise and make recommendations to the 
Archivist on issues related to the development, implementation, and use 
of the ERA system.
    The Committee will be composed of not more that 20 voting members 
considered having particular expertise, knowledge and experience in 
electronic records. Members will be appointed by the Archivist of the 
United States.
    Unless renewed by appropriate action prior to its expiration, the 
Charter for the Advisory Committee on the Electronic Records Archives 
will expire two years from the date of establishment.

    Dated: August 17, 2005.
Mary Ann Hadyka,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-16786 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alvin A. Hirsch,  the Chief Financial  Officer of Mile Marker  International,
Inc. (the  "Company"),  have executed this  certification in connection with the
filing with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Company's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 29th
day of July, 2004.


/s/  Alvin A. Hirsch
------------------------
     Alvin A. Hirsch
Chief Financial Officer


                                       20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,437                   5,437
<SECURITIES>                                     1,840                   1,840
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,082                   2,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,591                  11,591
<PP&E>                                         158,766                 158,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,840                   1,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,551                 175,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,652                  73,652
<BONDS>                                         39,945                  39,945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           111                     111
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,843                  61,843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,551                 175,551
<SALES>                                         12,505                  32,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,505                  32,597
<CGS>                                            7,897                  20,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,897                  20,146 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,187                  10,281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 245                     653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,607                   3,706
<INCOME-TAX>                                       611                   1,079
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                996                   2,627
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       996                   2,627
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09                     .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09                     .23
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George E. Strickler, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of Stoneridge, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ GEORGE E. STRICKLERGeorge E. Strickler, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerFebruary 25, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A

                        --------------------------------
         (Mark One)

         |X|      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1997

                                       OR

         |_|      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         For the transition period from _________________ to ___________________

                         Commission File Number 0-25970

                         CONSOLIDATED ECO-SYSTEMS, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

            IDAHO                                               82-0464589
(State or other jurisdiction of                              (I.R.S. Employer
  incorporation or organization)                            Identification No.)

                              6807 West 12th Street
                           Little Rock, Arkansas 72204

                    (Address of principal executive offices)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (501) 664-7745

           Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

                                      None

           Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

      Title of Each Class                           Name on Each Market
                                                      on Which Listed

   Common Stock, $.001 par value                          NASDAQ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|

As of May 5, 1997, 15,354,942 shares of the registrant's common stock were
outstanding.

The Registrant hereby amends this report to file Exhibit 27-Financial Data
Schedule. 

<PAGE>

                                     SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                               CONSOLIDATED ECO-SYSTEMS, INC.

                            
                               By: /s/ Original Signed by James J. Connors, Jr.
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   JAMES J. CONNORS, JR.
                                   President

Date:  May 15, 1997


                                        6
6-1162-JDR-393
                     


Western Pacific Airlines, Inc.
2864 South Circle Drive
Suite 1100
Colorado Springs, CO  80906


Subject:          Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-JDR-393 to
                         Purchase Agreement No. 1947 --
                         Aircraft Performance Guarantees


This Letter Agreement  amends Purchase  Agreement No. 1947 dated as of even date
herewith (the Agreement) between The Boeing Company (Boeing) and Western Pacific
Airlines, Inc. (Buyer) relating to Model 737-300 aircraft (the Aircraft).

All terms used herein and in the Agreement,  and not defined  herein,  will have
the same meaning as in the Agreement.

1.       Aircraft Performance Guarantees.

         The only  performance  guarantees  applicable to the Aircraft are those
set forth in  Attachment A. Such  guarantees  are exclusive and will expire upon
delivery of the Aircraft to Buyer.

2.       Confidentiality.

         Buyer  understands  that certain  commercial and financial  information
contained in this Letter  Agreement are  considered  by Boeing as  confidential.
Buyer  agrees  that it will  treat this  Letter  Agreement  and the  information
contained herein as confidential and will not, without the prior written consent
of

P.A. No. 1947
K/WPA


<PAGE>


Western Pacific Airlines, Inc.
6-1162-JDR-393   Page 2

Boeing,  disclose this Letter  Agreement or any information  contained herein to
any other person or entity, except as provided in Letter Agreement 1947-1.

Very truly yours,

THE BOEING COMPANY



By
  -----------------------
Its  Attorney-In-Fact


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this

Date:                    , 1996


WESTERN PACIFIC AIRLINES, INC.



By
  --------------------------------
Its



Attachment

P.A. No. 1947
K/WPA


<PAGE>