alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Pinnacle Resources, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Glen R. Gamble
                                     Glen R. Gamble
                     President & Chief Executive Officer

October 12, 2004
STATE v. Dwight McDOUGALD.

No. 64A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 4, 2007.

Irving Joyner, Durham, for McDougald.

R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of November 2007 by State of NC for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. State of NC shall have up to and including the 16th day of January 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of December 2007."
#### In the Matter of Howard S. Podolsky et al., Petitioners, v Randy A. Daniels et al., Respondents.

[799 NYS2d 917]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Department of State of the State of New York, dated August 12, 2003, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioners demonstrated untrustworthiness as real estate brokers, and imposed a penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

“It is hornbook law that one who objects to the act of an administrative agency must exhaust available administrative *560remedies before being permitted to litigate in a court of law” *(Watergate II Apts. v Buffalo Sewer Auth.,*46 NY2d 52, 57 [1978]). Because the petitioners failed to exhaust an available administrative remedy *(see*19 NYCRR 400.2 [k]) or establish that the pursuit of such remedy would have been futile, the petition must be denied and the proceeding dismissed *(see Segalla v Town of Amenia,*309 AD2d 742 [2003]; *Matter of Welch v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*287 AD2d 725, 726 [2001]; *Matter of Priester v Dowling,*231 AD2d 638, 639 [1996]). That the language of 19 NYCRR 400.2 (k) is couched in permissive, rather than mandatory terms, does not excuse the petitioners’ failure to exhaust the administrative remedies available to them *(see Matter of Schiavone/Shea/Frontier-Kemper v New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection,*274 AD2d 586, 586-587 [2000]). H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eden Bioscience Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley S. Powell, President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 13, 2008



/s/ Bradley S. Powell


Bradley S. Powell


President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary










- 21 -



---
STATE v. HARDY.

No. COA06-1518.

Court of appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 18, 2007.

Certification Date October 8, 2007.

Appeal from Edgecombe (05CRS53063).

Case reported without published opinion No error.
S. 3606 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To extend the special immigrant nonminister religious worker program and for 

other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as ‘‘Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program Act’’. 

SEC. 2. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT NONMINISTER RELIGIOUS WORKER PROGRAM. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subclause (II) and subclause (III) of section 

101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) are amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2008,’’ both 

places such term appears and inserting ‘‘March 6, 2009,’’. 

(b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 30 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security 

shall— 

(1) issue final regulations to eliminate or reduce fraud 

related to the granting of special immigrant status for special 

immigrants described in subclause (II) or (III) of section 

101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)); and 

(2) submit a certification to Congress and publish notice 

in the Federal Register that such regulations have been issued 

and are in effect. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than March 6, 2009, the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security shall submit to Congress a report on the effectiveness of the regulations required by 

subsection (b)(1). 

(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall take effect on the date that the Secretary of Homeland 

Security submits the certification described in subsection (b)(2) 
S. 3606—2 

stating that the final regulations required by subsection (b)(1) have 

been issued and are in effect. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit
10.16 


 


ASSIGNMENT
AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT


 


THIS
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (“Assignment
and Assumption Agreement”) is effective as of September 15 2015, by and between by and between Fortress Biotech.,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Fortress”)
and Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Checkpoint”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
Fortress and NeuPharma (“NeuPharma”)
are parties to that certain Research Agreement (the “NeuPharma
Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to the NeuPharma Agreement, Fortress may assign the NeuPharma Agreement to an Affiliate (as defined in the NeuPharma Agreement)
of Fortress without NeuPharma’s prior written consent; and


 


WHEREAS,
Checkpoint is an Affiliate of Fortress; and


 


WHEREAS,
Fortress wishes to assign the NeuPharma Agreement to Checkpoint and, in connection therewith, Checkpoint has agreed to accept such
assignment and assume the obligations thereunder.


 


AGREEMENTS


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed
that:


 


1.          Assignment.
Fortress hereby sells, assigns, conveys, transfers and delivers to Checkpoint all of Fortress’s right, title
and interest in and to the NeuPharma Agreement.


 


2.          Assumption.
Checkpoint hereby accepts the foregoing assignment, and in connection therewith, Checkpoint hereby agrees to assume
all liabilities arising thereunder from and after the Effective Date.


 


4.          Effective
Time. The effective time of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement is 11:59 p.m. EST on the date hereof.


 


5.          Counterparts;
Electronic Delivery. This Assignment and Assumption Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts with
the same effect as if each of the parties hereto had signed the same document. All counterparts shall be construed together and
shall constitute one Assignment and Assumption Agreement. This Assignment and Assumption Agreement, to the extent signed and delivered
by means of a facsimile machine or via e-mail, shall be treated in all manner and respects as an original agreement or instrument
and shall be considered to have the same binding legal effect as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered in person.


 




     


     


    

  


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment and Assumption Agreement as of the date first above written.


 


	FORTRESS
    BIOTECH, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Lindsay Rosenwald	 
	 	 	 
	Name:	Lindsay Rosenwald	 
	 	 	 
	Title:	CEO	 
	 	 	 
	CHECKPOINT THERAPEUTICS, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Michael Weiss	 
	 	 	 
	Name:	Michael
    Weiss	 
	 	 	 
	Title:	Interim President
    and CEO	 


 


[Signature
Page to Assignment and Assumption Agreement]
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF DRIL-QUIP, INC.



|                                              |  |                            
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Name of Entity                                |  | Jurisdiction ofOrganization
|Dril-Quip (Europe) Limited                    |  | Scotland                   
|Dril-Quip Asia Pacific PTE Ltd.               |  | Singapore                  
|Dril-Quip do Brasil LTDA                      |  | Brazil                     
|Dril-Quip (Nigeria) Ltd                       |  | Nigeria                    
|Dril-Quip Egypt for Petroleum Services S.A.E. |  | Egypt                      
|Dril-Quip (Tianjin) Oilfield Services Ltd     |  | China                      
|Dril-Quip France SARL                         |  | France                     
|Dril-Quip Angola LTDA                         |  | Angola                     
|Dril-Quip Holdings Pty. Ltd.                  |  | Australia
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund IX, L.P. (the Registrant) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the
General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | May 13, 2009           



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | May 13, 2009
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHANNON BREWER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting

Commissioner Social Security, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-35652

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-05703-JCC

Western District of Washington, 

Tacoma

ORDER

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and TROTT and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges

Plaintiff-Appellant’s unopposed motion to remand for consideration of new

evidence [Doc. # 31] is GRANTED. This appeal is REMANDED for further

administrative proceedings. 

FILED

NOV 09 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
<PAGE>
Exhibit  99.1


                     BANC OF AMERICA SPECIALTY FINANCE, INC.
                           ANNUAL OFFICER CERTIFICATE

                       NationsCredit Grantor Trust 1997-2


The  undersigned certifies that he is a Senior Vice President of Banc of America
Specialty  Finance,  Inc.  formerly  NationsCredit Distribution Finance, Inc., a
Georgia  corporation (the "Servicer"), and that as such he is duly authorized to
execute  and  deliver  this  certificate  on  behalf of the Servicer pursuant to
Section  13.10  of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 30,
1997  among  NationsCredit  Securitization Corporation, NationsCredit Commercial
Corporation  and  Bankers  Trust Company (the 'Agreement') and further certifies
that  ( I ) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the period January
1,  2000  up to and including December 31, 2000 and of its performance under the
Agreement  has  been  made  and  (ii)  based  on  such  review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout the past year up
to  and  including  December  31,  2000.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I  have affixed hereto my signature this the 27th day of
                                                                    ----
March,  2001.

     Banc  of  America  Specialty  Finance,  Inc.




     By:  /s/  CHRISTOPHER  SPOENEMAN
          ---------------------------
               Christopher  Spoeneman
               Senior Vice President



                                   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smith Barney Potomac Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jerry PascucciJerry Pascucci
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
President and DirectorMarch 28, 2008Date


---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1490

EARL VENNINGS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BEATRICE WHITTEN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00003-MGL)

Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 28, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl Vennings, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Earl Vennings, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and 

advised Vennings that failure to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation 

could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy, 858 

F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985); see 

also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154-55 (1985). 

Although Vennings received proper notice and filed timely objections to the 

magistrate judge’s recommendation, he has waived appellate review because the objections 

were not specific to the particularized legal recommendations made by the magistrate 

judge. See Martin, 858 F.3d at 245 (holding that, “to preserve for appeal an issue in a 

magistrate judge’s report, a party must object to the finding or recommendation on that 

issue with sufficient specificity so as reasonably to alert the district court of the true ground 

for the objection” (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we affirm the 

judgment of the district court. 
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6783

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIE HORTON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, Senior District Judge. (1:89-cr-00180-AJT-1)

Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 3, 2023

Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Horton, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6783 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Horton, a federal prisoner serving a life sentence for murder, appeals the 

district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 

§ 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the 

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Malone, 57 

F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (explaining standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm 

the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6783 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/03/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
FILED'INI

RECEIVED IN TheCourt ofAppeals

^IhthDhSEr"1" Sixth District

nov o s 2015 MOV 0 6 2015

J nlhi^ Arfr,B' :^,"s. TexarKana, Texas

0o• MU , f 8y' RDebra K--^ey, Citato

orA,^ AjpaiuA^ 0>u>4-i op.Von fi^»i^h_f Jw^ /^f^K^f^

jrrj ^V<abhj/ ^>w £vr /e?o( oAo^ ,j£w> r^9^ ^QlAn

reUfcO. a^o/ttflon -r^&'nj uw( ctUr'ef tiouJ.a- be <y^c/dtU

^P ^^^'^ U /W c^ 4_ rec4)lfl ^ ^^ ^

^*4^| o^&lar cam caW,1s>xl ^mMia^ v^ra^s 9Qn fa a JfQJSr-
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3235 

To reduce the amount of financial assistance provided to the Government 

of Mexico in response to the illegal border crossings from Mexico into 

the United States, which serve to dissipate the political discontent with 

the higher unemployment rate within Mexico. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2008 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To reduce the amount of financial assistance provided to 

the Government of Mexico in response to the illegal 

border crossings from Mexico into the United States, 

which serve to dissipate the political discontent with the 

higher unemployment rate within Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BORDER CROSSING ACCOUNTABILITY. 

4 (a) ESTIMATION OF ANNUAL ILLEGAL BORDER

5 CROSSINGS.—Not later than 30 days after the end of each 

6 fiscal year, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the 

7 Secretary of Homeland Security, shall estimate the numVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:57 Jul 09, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3235.IS S3235

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3235 IS

1 ber of illegal border crossings that occurred during such 

2 fiscal year along the southern land border of the United 

3 States. 

4 (b) REDUCTION OF FOREIGN ASSISTANCE.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under 

6 paragraph (2), the Secretary of State, shall propor7 tionately reduce the amount of financial assistance 

8 provided to the Government of Mexico for each fiscal 

9 year by a total of $1,000 for each illegal border 

10 crossing from Mexico to the United States during 

11 the previous fiscal year. 

12 (2) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding paragraph 

13 (1), the Secretary of State may decide not to reduce 

14 the amounts appropriated for the Government of 

15 Mexico from the International Military Education 

16 and Training Fund, the International Narcotics 

17 Control and Law Enforcement Fund, and the fund 

18 to carry out nonproliferation, anti-terrorism, 

19 demining, and related programs and activities. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5696 

To make a technical correction to section 3009 of the Deficit Reduction 

Act of 2005. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2008 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, and Mr. BOUCHER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To make a technical correction to section 3009 of the Deficit 

Reduction Act of 2005. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENTS FROM THE DIGITAL TELE4 VISION TRANSITION AND PUBLIC SAFETY 

5 FUND. 

6 Section 3009(a) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 

7 (Public Law 109–171) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2009’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘fiscal years 2009 through 2012’’; and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5696 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘no earlier than October 1, 

2 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘on or after February 18, 

3 2009’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS