alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Kendrick Donta COLSON.

No. 512P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, John Snyder, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Haral E. Carlin, for Colson.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 650 S.E.2d 656.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by the State of NC on the 18th day of October 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the, following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th day of October 2007 by the State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the State of NC on the 18th day of October 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of December 2007."
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3605 

AN ACT 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain 

criminal history background checks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 3605 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal History 

3 Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

5 Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 5119a note) is amended by striking ‘‘a 66-month’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘a 78-month’’. 

Passed the Senate September 26 (legislative day, 

September 17), 2008. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3605 

AN ACT 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to 

obtain criminal history background checks.
# The Agriculture (Cross compliance) (No. 2) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 3231

Agriculture, England

# The Agriculture (Cross compliance) (No. 2) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

18th December 2013

Laid before Parliament

20th December 2013

Coming into force

1st January 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.1.2015) by The Common Agricultural Policy (Control and Enforcement, Cross-Compliance, Scrutiny of Transactions and Appeals) Regulations                                 2014 (S.I. 2014/3263), reg. 1(1), **Sch. 5**

## F1EXPLANATORY NOTE                  

(This note is not part of the Regulations)

These Regulations amend the Agriculture (Cross compliance) (No. 2) Regulations 2009 (S.I. 2009/3365). They add provisions under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 (S.I. 2010/675) (failures to comply with requirements relating to groundwater activities) to the list of provisions which constitute failures                     of cross compliance by claimants of subsidy under the single payment scheme.                  

An impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no impact on the private or voluntary sector, and no significant                     impact on the public sector, is foreseen.
Exhibit
      32.2








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
      A. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/
                David A. JacksonChief
                Financial OfficerMay
                9, 2006








*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight
      Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.*




Back
      to Form
      10-Q
In the Matter of IBM CREDIT CORP.

No. 520A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 5, 2007.

S.C. Kitchen, Durham, for Durham County.

Michael T. Medford, Raleigh, Judson A. Welborn, Wilmington, for IBM Credit Corp.

Lucy Chavis, Assistant County Attorney, for NC Asso. of County Comm.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of November 2007 by NC Association of County Commissioners for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule *24628(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of November 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3,338
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,611
<INVENTORY>                                    1,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,741
<PP&E>                                         5,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,697
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          15
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12,775
<SALES>                                        1,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,664
<CGS>                                          1,072
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (91)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 655
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                98
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (5,237)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (5,238)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (5,238)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.34)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          76,468                       0
<SECURITIES>                                     1,149                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,056                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,189                  85,189 
<PP&E>                                         264,581                 264,581 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,352                   4,352 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 374,512                 374,512 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,243                  26,243 
<BONDS>                                        175,165                 175,165 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           158                     158 
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,873                 133,873 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   374,512                 374,512 
<SALES>                                         21,353                  40,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,353                  40,296
<CGS>                                           28,184<F1>              45,596<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,184<F1>              45,596<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 380                     653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,836)                 (1,504)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (458)                     809
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,378)                 (5,083)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                   2,770<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                       0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)                   (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)                   (.32)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES NON-RECURRING CHARGE OF $8,495.
<F2>ADOPTION OF AICPA SOP 98-5.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### D.J.H. Mechanical Associates, Ltd., Respondent, v Mahopac Central School District, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 907]

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered July 21, 2004, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The issue presented on this appeal is whether the plaintiff timely commenced this breach of contract action in accordance with Education Law § 3813 (2-b), which states that no action shall be commenced against a school district “more than one year after the cause of action arose.” A cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract arises, and the statute of limitations therefore begins to run, upon the breach *(see John J. Kassner & Co. v City of New York,*46 NY2d 544 [1979]). “A breach of contract can be said to occur when the claimant’s bill is expressly rejected, or when the ‘party seeking payment should have viewed his claim as having been constructively rejected’ ” *(Henry Boeckmann, Jr. & Assoc. v Board of Educ., Hempstead Union Free School Dist. No. 1,*207 AD2d 773, 775 [1994] quoting *Helmer-Cronin Constr. v Beacon Community Dev. Agency,*156 AD2d 543, 543-544 [1989]; *see Spoleta Constr. & Dev. Corp. v Board of Educ. of Byron-Bergen Cent. School Dist.,*221 AD2d 927 [1995]).

*522The defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred was properly denied. The defendant failed to establish that the plaintiffs requests for payment were either expressly or constructively rejected, as is required for the cause of action to accrue, more than one year before commencement of the action. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ, concur.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 746/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 746/2013 of 29 July 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for megrims in areas VIIIc, IX            and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 by vessels flying the flag of Portugal         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 746/2013                     

# of 29 July 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for megrims in areas VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 by vessels flying the                        flag of Portugal                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 39/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available to EU vessels for                              certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are not subject to international negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 July 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 1.
EXHIBIT 15 - LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 10549


RE:    ITI Technologies, Inc. Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Registrations Nos. 33-89826, 333-08943, 333-08945, 333-23751 and 333-58257)

We are aware that our report dated October 29, 1998, on our reviews of interim
consolidated financial information of ITI Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries
for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998 and 1997,
and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 1998, is incorporated by reference in these registration
statements. Pursuant to Rule 436 (c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this
report should not be considered a part of the registration statements prepared
or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 11, 1998


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       18
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3218 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3218

  To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal 
                       history background checks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2008

 Mr. Biden (for himself and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal 
                       history background checks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminal History Background Checks 
Pilot Extension Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a note) is 
amended by striking ``a 60-month'' and inserting ``a 66-month''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

Calendar No. 253 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 324 

[Report No. 110–112] 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of water resources 

in the State of New Mexico. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2007 

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JUNE 28, 2007 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study 

of water resources in the State of New Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Mexico Aquifer 

5 Assessment Act of 2007’’. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 324 RS

1 SEC. 2. NEW MEXICO WATER RESOURCES STUDY. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, act3 ing through the Director of the United States Geological 

4 Survey (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’), in co5 ordination with the State of New Mexico (referred to in 

6 this Act as the ‘‘State’’) and any other entities that the 

7 Secretary determines to be appropriate (including other 

8 Federal agencies and institutions of higher education), 

9 shall, in accordance with this Act and any other applicable 

10 law, conduct a study of water resources in the State, in11 cluding— 

12 (1) a survey of groundwater resources, includ13 ing an analysis of— 

14 (A) aquifers in the State, including the 

15 quantity of water in the aquifers; 

16 (B) the availability of groundwater re17 sources for human use; 

18 (C) the salinity of groundwater resources; 

19 (D) the potential of the groundwater re20 sources to recharge; 

21 (E) the interaction between groundwater 

22 and surface water; 

23 (F) the susceptibility of the aquifers to 

24 contamination; and 

25 (G) any other relevant criteria; and 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•S 324 RS

1 (2) a characterization of surface and bedrock 

2 geology, including the effect of the geology on 

3 groundwater yield and quality. 

4 (b) STUDY AREAS.—The study carried out under 

5 subsection (a) shall include the Estancia Basin, Salt 

6 Basin, Tularosa Basin, Hueco Basin, and middle Rio 

7 Grande Basin in the State. 

8 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date 

9 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

10 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 

11 Senate and the Committee on Resources of the House of 

12 Representatives a report that describes the results of the 

13 study. 

14 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

15 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec16 essary to carry out this Act. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Calendar No. 253 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 324 

[Report No. 110

–112] 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct 

Mexico. a study of water resources in the State of New 

JUNE 28, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
84 LUMBER CO., L.P. v. HABITECH ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. COA07-574.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 4, 2007.

Certification Date December 27, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (03CVD691).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. FIELDS.

No. COA07-317.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (04CRS72874, 05CRS23217).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code 'SS' 1350

     The undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of The General Chemical Group Inc. (the
"Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                      /s/ John M. Kehoe, Jr.
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      John M. Kehoe, Jr.
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The General Chemical Group Inc. and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. Calvin WILSON, Jr.

No. 27P06-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of May 2007 by Defendant for "Amended Petition for Writ of Certiorari and/or Other Available Relief Pursuant to the All Writs Act":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of December 2007."