alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 51851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17313]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee Management Renewal

    The NSF management officials having responsibility for NSB Public 
Service Award Committee (<greek-i>5195) have determined that renewing 
this group for another two years is necessary and in the public 
interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the 
Director, National Science Foundation by 42 U.S.C. 1861 et seq. This 
determination follows consultation with the Committee Management 
Secretariat, General Services Administration.
    Authority for this Committee will expire on September 4, 2005, 
unless renewed. For more information contact Susanne Bolton at (703) 
292-7488.

    Dated: August 26, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-17313 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Pia Rotondi, Deceased. Louis Rotondi, Respondent; Paul Rotondi, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 621]

In a probate proceeding, Paul Rotondi appeals from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated February 18, 2004, which admitted to probate the last will and testament of Pia Rotondi dated June 7, 2002.

Ordered that the decree is affirmed, with costs.

Louis Rotondi, Paul Rotondi and Michael Rotondi are the sons of the decedent. In the subject will, the decedent left the bulk of her estate to Louis Rotondi, and appointed him as the executor. The will contains an in terrorem clause. After SCPA *11101404 examinations, Louis Rotondi offered the will for probate. The Surrogate’s Court admitted the will to probate. We affirm.

Contrary to Paul Rotondi’s contention, the admission of the will into probate did not violate an agreement between the parties to continue the SCPA 1404 examinations, and did not deprive him of an opportunity to conduct a full investigation pursuant to SCPA 1404 and EPTL 3-3.5 *(see Matter of Ellis, 252*AD2d 118 [1998]). Further, none of the evidence adduced at the SCPA 1404 examinations revealed that Louis Rotondi exercised undue influence over the decedent or any other ground to prevent the admission of the will to probate. Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Ritter and Rivera, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 
| **Class** |   | **2003  CUSIP** |   | **Principal  Distrib. Amount** |   | **Class  Interest  Distribution Amt** |   | **Total  P&I  Payable** |   |
|-----------|--------|-----------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
| A-1       |   | 33736LAA3       |   | 0.00                           |   | 0.00                                  |   | 0.00                        |   |
| A-2       |   | 33736LAB1       |   | 180,213,449.80                 |   | 24,029,425.58                         |   | 203,242,875.38              |   |
| A-3       |   | 33736LAC9       |   | 0.00                           |   | 29,210,925.00                         |   | 29,210,925.60               |   |
| B         |   | 33736LAE5       |   | 0.00                           |   | 5,819,696.10                          |   | 5,819,696.10                |   |
| C         |   | 33736LAF2       |   | 0.00                           |   | 5,341,920.00                          |   | 5,341,920.00                |   |
| D         |   | 33736LAG0       |   | 0.00                           |   | 5,385,000.00                          |   | 5,385,000.00                |   |
| E         |   | 33736LAH8       |   | 0.00                           |   | 1,517,605.00                          |   | 1,517,605.00                |   |
| F         |   | 33736LAJ4       |   | 0.00                           |   | 5,026,000.00                          |   | 5,026,000.00                |   |
| G         |   | 33736LAK1       |   | 0.00                           |   | 913,836.91                            |   | 913,836.91                  |   |
| H         |   | 33736LAL9       |   | 0.00                           |   | 1,827,627.48                          |   | 1,827,627.48                |   |
| J         |   | 33736LAM7       |   | 0.00                           |   | 913,813.81                            |   | 913,813.81                  |   |
| K         |   | 33736LAN5       |   | 0.00                           |   | 624,335.09                            |   | 624,335.09                  |   |
| IO        |   | 33736LAD7       |   | 0.00                           |   | 15,208,697.35                         |   | 15,208,697.35               |   |
| R         |   | N/A             |   | 0.00                           |   | 0.00                                  |   | 0.00                        |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49361-49362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16739]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Policy Statement No. ANM-113-04-032]


Certification of an In-seat Video System

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of final policy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces the 
availability of final policy on certification of an in-seat video 
system.

DATES: This final policy was issued by the Transport Airplane 
Directorate on August 12, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Piccola, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate, Transport Standards 
Staff, Standardization Branch, ANM-113; 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
WA 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1509; fax (425) 227-1232; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#204a4f484e0e504943434f4c41604641410e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c3a9acabadedb3aaa0a0acafa283a5a2a2eda4acb5">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Disposition of Comments

    A notice of proposed policy was published in the Federal Register 
on December 3, 2004 (69 FR 70303). Two (2) commenters responded to the 
request for comments.

Background

    Based on data industry has presented to the FAA, in-seat video 
system designs have matured to the point that dedicated testing is not 
required per 14 CFR 25.601. This policy recommends the use of Aerospace 
Recommended Practice (ARP) 5475 when abuse load tests are required. 
This policy adds analysis or inspection as valid means of compliance, 
in lieu of test. The FAA

[[Page 49362]]

also clarifies questions that have arisen regarding previously released 
policy on this subject.
    The final policy as well as the disposition of public comments 
received are available on the Internet at the following address: http://airweb.faa.gov.rgl. If you do not have access to the Internet, you can 
obtain a copy of the policy by contacting the person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on August 12, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-16739 Filed 8-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
WALKER v. BRSS, LLC.

No. COA06-1340.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (05CVS12213, 04CRS26161).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3544 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the financing of 

the Superfund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. 

OBAMA, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. 

DODD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the financing of the Superfund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Superfund Polluter 

5 Pays Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUPERFUND TAXES. 

7 (a) EXCISE TAXES.—Section 4611(e) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3544 IS

1 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE

2 SUPERFUND FINANCING RATE.—The Hazardous Sub3 stance Superfund financing rate under this section shall 

4 apply after December 31, 1986, and before January 1, 

5 1996, and after the date of the enactment of this sub6 section and before January 1, 2017.’’. 

7 (b) CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL INCOME TAX.— 

8 Section 59A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

9 amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF TAX.—The tax imposed by this 

11 section shall apply to taxable years beginning after De12 cember 31, 1986, and before January 1, 1996, and to tax13 able years beginning after the date of the enactment of 

14 this subsection and before January 1, 2017.’’. 

15 (c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

16 (1) Section 4611(b) of the Internal Revenue 

17 Code of 1986 is amended— 

18 (A) by striking ‘‘or exported from’’ in 

19 paragraph (1)(A), 

20 (B) by striking ‘‘or exportation’’ in para21 graph (1)(B), and 

22 (C) by striking ‘‘AND EXPORTATION’’ in 

23 the heading. 

24 (2) Section 4611(d)(3) of such Code is amend25 ed— 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 3544 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘or exporting the crude oil, 

2 as the case may be’’ in the text and inserting 

3 ‘‘the crude oil’’, and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘OR EXPORTS’’ in the 

5 heading. 

6 (d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

7 (1) EXCISE TAXES.—The amendments made by 

8 subsections (a) and (c) shall take effect on the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (2) INCOME TAX.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (b) shall apply to taxable years beginning 

12 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.1
 FORM A
 APOLLO GROUP, INC.
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 RECITALS
    NOW, THEREFORE
 Grant of Restricted Stock Units
 ParticipantAward Date:Number of Shares
Subject to Award:
    
    ___ shares of Class A Common Stock (the Shares)Vesting Provisions:
    
    Performance Vesting: Except as otherwise provided
in Paragraph 5, none of the Shares subject to this
Award shall vest, and this Award shall terminate in
its entirety, should the Corporation fail to attain
the Performance Goal specified in attached Schedule
I for the applicable Performance Period.Service Vesting: If such Performance Goal is
attained, then the number of Shares in which
Participant may vest hereunder shall be determined
in accordance with the service vesting provisions of
Paragraph 3.Accelerated Vesting: The Shares subject to this
Award shall be subject to accelerated vesting
pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 5.
 Limited Transferability
 1




---



##### 



Vesting Requirements
 Performance Vesting
 Service Vesting
 
 Cessation of Service.
 Stockholder Rights and Dividend Equivalents
   2




---



##### 



Special Vesting Acceleration Provisions
   later
  
  Adjustment in Shares
 3




---



##### 



Issuance of Shares of Common Stock
  later
       provided, however
 4




---



##### 



Compliance with Laws and Regulations
 Notices
 Successors and Assigns
 Construction
 Governing Law
 5




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 APOLLO GROUP, INC.By:Title:PARTICIPANTSignature:
 6




---



##### 



APPENDIX A
 DEFINITIONS
  Agreement
 Award
 Award Date
 Board
 Change in Control
 Code
 Class A Common Stock
 Corporation
 Disability
 Employee
 Fair Market Value
 A-1




---



##### 



1934 Act
 Participant
 Parent
 Performance Goal
 Performance Period
 Performance Shares
 Plan
 Plan Administrator
 Service provided, however
 Shares
 Stock Exchange
 Subsidiary
 Withholding Taxes
 A-2




---



##### 



SCHEDULE I
 PERFORMANCE PERIOD AND PERFORMANCE GOAL
ASI Aviation, Inc.


8521 Leesburg Pike, Suite 175


Vienna, VA 22182 


 


March 13, 2016


 


Dr. Carl Jacobsen


4535 32nd Street, NW


Washington, D.C. 20008


 


Re: Offer of Engagement, Vice President -
Administration


 


Dear Dr. Jacobsen:


 


ASI Aviation, Inc. (ASI) is pleased to offer you the position of
Vice President - Administration effective March 1, 2016. In this position, your duties and responsibilities will encompass drafting
and reviewing company contracts and other agreements, the legal and grammatical review of all public documents of the company and
liaisoning with outside counsel.


 


You will be compensated at the rate of $50.00 per hour as an independent
contractor through ASI’s semi-monthly payroll cycle starting with the commencement of Pre-IPO funding date expected in March/April
2016 time frame. Initially you will be expected to work four (4) hours per week or as required, subject to increase by approval
from the Board. Your compensation will be reviewed after six (6) months and will be subject to obtaining investment capital by
the Company and the financial condition of the Company. You will need to complete and return the attached W-9 prior to presenting
an invoice for your work.


 


You will be required to sign a non-compete, non-solicitation of
client employee and confidentiality agreement with ASI. As an independent contractor you will be allowed to engage in other consultancies
so long as the Company is informed and there is no conflict of interest regarding client identified solicitations.


 


ASI envisions this as an opportunity for you to participate in the
development of dynamic business growth of the Company where your capabilities and experience will be applied to our mutual benefit.


 


Please acknowledge your acceptance of this offer with ASI in accordance
with the terms set forth in this letter, by signing and dating below and returning to us the original copy of this letter. You
are advised to keep a copy for your file.


 


Sincerely yours,


 


/s/ Danette Penenburgh


Danette Penenburgh


Director, Contracts Administration & Human Resources


 


 


Acceptance: /s/ L. Carl Jacobsen Date: March 14, 2016


 


cc:HR File


B.B. Sahay
Exhibit



        





March 17, 2016                                    Exhibit     10.103    
To the Lenders parties to the
Credit Agreement referred
to below
Re:    Request for Extension of Termination Date
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to that certain Third Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2015 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Credit Agreement", terms defined therein and not otherwise defined herein being used herein as defined therein), among DTE Electric Company (the "Company"), the Lenders (as defined in the Credit Agreement) parties thereto and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders (the "Administrative Agent"), the Company hereby requests that, effective as of April 16, 2016, the Termination Date be extended for a period of one year from the Termination Date now in effect, as provided in Section 2.18 of the Credit Agreement.
You must give notice to the Administrative Agent whether or not you agree to the requested extension. Under Section 2.18(b) of the Credit Agreement, such notice generally must be received no later than 10 Business Days after the Administrative Agent receives this request; however, the Company hereby waives this deadline and sets the Lender Notice Date as April 6, 2016.
The Company hereby certifies that the following statements are true on the date hereof, and will be true on the extension of the Termination Date:
(1)    no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing on the applicable Extension Date and immediately after giving effect thereto; and
(2)    the representations and warranties of the Borrower set forth in the Credit Agreement are true and correct on and as of the applicable Extension Date and after giving effect thereto, as though made on and as of such date (or to the extent that such representations and warranties specifically refer to an earlier date, as of such earlier date).
This notice and request is subject in all respects to the terms of the Credit Agreement, is irrevocable and shall be effective only if received by the Administrative Agent no later than March 17, 2016.
DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY




By : /s/David R. Murphy
Title : Assistant Treasurer


1
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of PriceLegacy Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

(a)           the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Dated:   November 11, 2003 | /s/ Jack McGrory        |
|--------|---------------------------------|-------------------------|
|   |                            | Jack McGrory            |
|   |                            | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of PriceLegacy Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

(a)           the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   November 11, 2003 | /s/ James Nakagawa      |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                            | James Y. Nakagawa       |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompanythe Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and are not being filed forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
STATE v. James Albert COLEY, Jr.

No. 399P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 8, 2007.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of August 2007 by Defendant for Relief:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of November 2007."
STATE v. REYES.

No. COA07-693.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 18, 2007.

Certification Date January 7, 2008.

Appeal from Montgomery (05CRS51284).

Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D2022-2715 

LT Case No. 2019-306204-CFDB 

_____________________________ 

DIONYSIUS GIOVANNI NICOLS, 

Appellant,

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. 

Dawn D. Nichols, Judge. 

J. Rafael Rodriguez, of Law Offices of J. Rafael Rodriguez,

Miami, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean

Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee. 

May 7, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., and HARRIS and KILBANE, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
# Council Implementing Decision 2014/730/CFSPShow full title

Council Implementing Decision 2014/730/CFSP of 20 October 2014 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive            measures against Syria         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision 2014/730/CFSP                     

# of 20 October 2014

# implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria(1) and in particular Article 30(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 31 May 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

(2)In view of the gravity of the situation, 16 persons and two entities should be added to the list of persons and entities subject                              to restrictive measures in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

(3)The information relating to three persons and one entity set out in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP should also be updated.

(4)Following the judgment of 3 July 2014 of the General Court in Case T-203/12(2), Mohamad Nedal Alchaar v Council, Dr Mohammad Nidal Al-Shaar should be removed from the list of persons and entities subject                              to restrictive measures in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

(5)Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Luxembourg, 20 October 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### I.The following persons and entities are added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies set out in Annex                        I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.U.K.

#### A.**Persons**U.K.

#### B.**Entities**U.K.

### II.The entries concerning the persons listed below, as set out in Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP, are replaced by the following                        entries.U.K.

#### A.**Persons**U.K.

#### B.**Entities**U.K.

### III.The person listed below is deleted from the list set out in Section A of Annex I to Decision 2013/255/CFSP.U.K.

Dr. Mohammad (   ) (a.k.a. Mohamed, Muhammad, Mohammed) Nidal (   ) Al-Shaar (   ) (a.k.a. Al-Chaar, Al-Sha'ar, Al-Cha'ar).                           

1

OJ L 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14.                           

2

Not yet published.