alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,412
<SECURITIES>                                     1,610
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,192
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,203
<PP&E>                                         322,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 340,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,404
<BONDS>                                        232,995
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           171
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   340,957
<SALES>                                         33,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,132
<CGS>                                           22,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   130
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,791)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,791)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)


</TABLE>
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.02


DESCRIPTION OF ANNUAL INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN FOR FISCAL 2017


On June 14, 2016, the Board approved the Company’s Annual Incentive Bonus Plan for fiscal year 2017. The plan provides its executive officers with the opportunity to earn annual cash bonuses based upon the achievement of pre-established performance goals. Total bonus opportunities will be based on achievement of annual targets. The plan provides for 50% of the bonus to be based on the achievement of quarterly objectives and 50% to be based on the achievement of annual objectives. Performance goals under the plan will be: revenue growth, earnings per share, operating profit, and return on invested capital targets at the Company level; and, additionally for certain executives, total sales, operating profit and new business wins and other business-specific business unit targets at the business unit level. The plan allows awards to provide for different metrics, target levels and weightings for different executives.
 
Under the Annual Incentive Bonus Plan, target award opportunities are set at various percentages of base salary, which will be: 200% of base salary in the case of the Chief Executive Officer; 110% of base salary in the case of the Chief Financial Officer; and between 80% and 110% of base salary in the cases of other officers. Actual payout opportunities for each bonus component will range from a threshold of 50% of target to a maximum of 200% of target for the quarterly payouts and 300% of target for the annual bonuses, in each case based on achievement of the performance measures. If the Company or business unit fails to achieve the threshold level for any performance measure, no payout is awarded for that measure. For purposes of determining achievement of award opportunities, the incentive bonus plan uses adjusted, non-GAAP measures.
Exhibit



        





March 17, 2016                                                                                                                        Exhibit 10.101                                                     
   
To the Lenders parties to the
Credit Agreement referred
to below
Re:    Request for Extension of Termination Date
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to that certain Third Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2015 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Credit Agreement", terms defined therein and not otherwise defined herein being used herein as defined therein), among DTE Energy Company (the "Company"), the Lenders (as defined in the Credit Agreement) parties thereto and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent for the Lenders (the "Administrative Agent"), the Company hereby requests that, effective as of April 16, 2016, the Termination Date be extended for a period of one year from the Termination Date now in effect, as provided in Section 2.19 of the Credit Agreement.
You must give notice to the Administrative Agent whether or not you agree to the requested extension. Under Section 2.19(b) of the Credit Agreement, such notice generally must be received no later than 10 Business Days after the Administrative Agent receives this request; however, the Company hereby waives this deadline and sets the Lender Notice Date as April 6, 2016. 
The Company hereby certifies that the following statements are true on the date hereof, and will be true on the extension of the Termination Date:
(1)    no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing on the applicable Extension Date and immediately after giving effect thereto; and
(2)    the representations and warranties of the Borrower set forth in the Credit Agreement are true and correct on and as of the applicable Extension Date and after giving effect thereto, as though made on and as of such date (or to the extent that such representations and warranties specifically refer to an earlier date, as of such earlier date).
This notice and request is subject in all respects to the terms of the Credit Agreement, is irrevocable and shall be effective only if received by the Administrative Agent no later than March 17, 2016.
DTE ENERGY COMPANY




By : /s/David R. Murphy
Title : Assistant Treasurer


1
STATE v. Marcos GUZMAN-PASCUAL.

No. 361P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Douglas Johnston, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the conditional motion filed on the 24th day of July 2007 by Defendant to Deem Petition Timely Filed or to treat it as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of October 2007."
IN RE I.N.P.

No. COA06-694.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Catawba (99J109).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.3
                                                                     -----------

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                             THE IXATA GROUP, INC.

     The IXATA Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"),
     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:   That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, by the unanimous
vote of its members at a meeting of the Board held on June 12, 2001, adopted a
resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation:

          RESOLVED, that the stockholders hereby authorize the Corporation to
     file the following Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation with the
     Secretary of State of the State of Delaware:

          Article FIRST of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

          "FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is RFP Express Inc."

     SECOND:   That in lieu of a meeting, the amendment of the Corporation=s
Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted by the written consent of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to
vote on the matter.

     THIRD:   That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Sections 242 and 228 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be
signed by its Secretary this 24/th/ day of July, 2001.

                                /s/ Christopher J. Hubbert
                              --------------------------------------
                              Christopher J. Hubbert, Secretary
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Iron Eagle Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jason M. Shapiro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Jason M. Shapiro
-----------------------------
Jason M. Shapiro
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

March 28, 2011
#### Darien Lake Theme Park and Camping Resort, Inc., Respondent, v Contour Erection & Siding Systems, Inc., Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 175]

Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered May 21, 2004. The decision, inter alia, awarded attorney’s fees and costs to plaintiff.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Kuhn v Kuhn,*129 AD2d 967 [1987]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1997, CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JEFFERSON CASINO CORPORATION AND ITS
SUBSIDIARY CASINO MAGIC OF LOUISIANA CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      10,675,429
<SECURITIES>                                10,629,405
<RECEIVABLES>                                  464,477
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,523,720
<PP&E>                                      82,257,246
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,993,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             142,637,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,348,617
<BONDS>                                    117,604,583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,592,227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               142,637,549
<SALES>                                     93,205,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            93,205,088
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               87,468,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (85,412)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,035,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,641,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,736,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,641,777)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.030)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael G. Newman, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 649]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), rendered February 13, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the third degree and sodomy in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and on the law by amending the order of protection and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [2]) and sodomy in the third degree (former § 130.40 [2]). We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered. Supreme Court’s reference to defendant’s right to appeal does not establish that the court “ ‘engage [d] the defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice’ ” *(People v Brown,*296 AD2d 860, 860 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 767 [2002]; *see People v Fehr,*303 AD2d 1039, 1039-1040 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 538 [2003]). In any event, a valid waiver of the right to appeal would not preclude defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence herein because the court failed to advise defendant of the potential maximum term of incarceration *(see Fehr,*303 AD2d at 1040; *People v Cormack,*269 AD2d 815 [2000]). Although we conclude that the sentence of incarceration is not unduly harsh or severe, we further conclude, and the People correctly concede, that the order of protection must be amended by limiting its duration because the court failed to take into ac*1344count any jail time credit to which defendant is entitled (see CPL 530.13 [4] [ii]; *People v Victor,*20 AD3d 927 [2005]; *People v Grice,*300 AD2d 1005, 1006 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 654 [2003]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention with respect to the duration of the order of protection, and thus we exercise our power to review his contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). We therefore modify the judgment by amending the order of protection, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court to determine the jail time credit to which defendant is entitled and to specify in the order of protection an expiration date that is three years from the date of expiration of the maximum term of the sentence *(see Victor,*20 AD3d at 928; *Grice,*300 AD2d at 1006). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Gorski, Martoche, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QT for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








*/s/
                Matthew A. Jones*Matthew
                A. JonesChief
                Financial OfficerJuly
                24, 2006
EXHIBIT 21
                                                                ----------

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                             As of December 31, 1999


1.       Sforza Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation

2.       Castle Room, Inc., a Florida corporation

3.       Clematis Bistro Corporation, a Florida corporation

4.       Sushi Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation

5.       Max's Beach Grille, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

6.       Unique Brickell, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

7.       Unique Weston, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

8.       Beach Place GP, Inc., a Florida corporation

9.       Brickell GP, Inc., a Florida corporation

10.      Weston GP, Inc., a Florida corporation
In the Matter of J.E., Q.D.

No. 297A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Pamela Newell Williams, Matthew McKay, Attorney Advocate, for Guardian ad Litem.

Tyrone C. Wade, Charlotte, for Mcklenburg County DSS.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of September 2007 by Respondent (Mother) to Impose Sanction of ordering Williams to reimburse IDS for Appellee counsel's attorney's fees for responding to Williams' Motion to Amend Record on Appeal:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of October 2007."
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 494/2013Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 494/2013 of 29 May 2013 implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive            measures in respect of Belarus         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 494/2013                     

# of 29 May 2013

# implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus(1), and in particular Article 8a(3) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 18 May 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.

(2)The Council considers that one person and two entities should be removed from the list of persons and entities subject to                              restrictive measures as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.

(3)Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 is hereby amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 29 May 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

R. Bruton                            

## ANNEXU.K.

The following person and entities are deleted from Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006:

Person

Shadryna, Hanna Stanislavauna

Entities

The Spirit and Vodka Company Aquadiv

Sport-Pari

1

OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.
STATE v. DICKERSON.

No. COA07-14.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS58418, 03CRS58019).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 31 (a)
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 August 8, 2008/s/ Richard H. SmithChief Executive Officer 40
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
               RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                             Six Months Ended
                                                                                  June 30,
                                                                           --------------------
                                                                             2002         2003
                                                                           -------      -------
<S>                                                                        <C>          <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations .............................     $(3,654)     $ 1,300
Add fixed charges:
Interest costs including amortization of debt issuance cost ..........       7,057        6,858
                                                                           -------      -------
    Earnings (loss) before fixed charges .............................       3,403        8,158
Fixed charges:
    Interest expense including amortization of debt issuance costs ...       7,057        6,858
                                                                           -------      -------
Earnings (deficiency) to cover fixed charges .........................      (3,654)       1,300
                                                                           =======      =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...................................          --         0.19
                                                                           =======      =======
</Table>