alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7734

JAMI' A. KHALIQ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

D. PATRICK, Officer, Jasper Lock-up Unit;

ELLIS GREENE, Nurse, A.C.I. Medical Unit,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-3261-2-17AJ)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 20, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jami' A. Khaliq, Appellant Pro Se. Norma Anne Turner Jett, EARLY

& NESS, Bamberg, South Carolina; William Henry Davidson, II,

James Miller Davis, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A.,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation dismissing Appellant's claim of deliberate

indifference to a serious medical need, see Estelle v. Gamble, 429

U.S. 97 (1976), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Khaliq v. Patrick,

No. CA-95-3261-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 1996; July 3, 1996). We also

conclude that the district court did not err in entering judgment

adverse to Appellant on his claim of excessive use of force. See

Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989). Appellant failed to create

a genuine issue of material fact regarding any more than de minimis

injury resulting from the alleged use of force on the part of the

prison guard. See Norman v. Taylor, 25 F.3d 1259, 1263 (4th Cir.

1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
WILLIAMS v. VONDERAU.

No. 18A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 14, 2007.

Bruce A. Mason, Wilmington, James F. Rutherford, for Vonderau.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of March 2007 by Plaintiff to Share Oral Argument:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of March 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David A. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





November
      10, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      David A. JacksonDavid
      A. JacksonChief
      Financial Officer








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight
Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.




Back to
Form 10-Q
STATE v. HANDY.

No. COA06-1337.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 17, 2007.

Certification Date August 6, 2007.

Appeal from Onslow (04CRS61104).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

S eptember 23, 2021
N o. 04-21-00386- CV
Gr eg ABBOTT , in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, Appellant

v. CI TY OF LAREDO and United Independent Sch ool District, Appellees
F rom the 49th Judicial District Court , Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021- CVK -001517- D1 Honorable Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER
S itting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Appellees, City of Laredo and United Independent School District, have filed an emergency motion asking this court to exercise its authority under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 29.3 to maintain the trial court’s temporary injunction in effect pending the disposition of this accelerated interlocutory appeal. We gra nt the motion and reinstate the trial court’s September 8, 2021 Temp or ary Injunction Order pending final disposition of this appeal.
It is so ORDERED on September 23, 2021. 

### PER CURIAM

A TTESTED TO: _____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 779/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 779/2013 of 13 August 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 779/2013                     

# of 13 August 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 August 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129411 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129411 

 COA: 260557 

Oakland CC: 1999-168010-FH 

DAVID GEORGE BORETTI,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00571-CR

The State of Texas

v.

Olin Anthony Robinson

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Jackson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 05-5-7221

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 26, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Biometrics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
R. Helm, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: October 3, 2006

                                       /s/ Ronald R. Helm
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Ronald R. Helm
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
HASSELL v. BOARD OF EDUC.

No. 172A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 24, 2007.

Ralph T. Bryant, Jr., Havelock, for Hassell.

George W. Lennon, Raleigh, for NCATL.

John F. Maddrey, Assistant Solicitor General, for Onslow County Board of Education.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of July 2007 by Defendant for extension of time to file brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Onslow County Board of Education) shall have up to and including the 27th day of July 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of July 2007."
STATE of North Carolina v. Ramon FLORES-RENTERIA.

No. 167P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Mercedes Chut, Greensboro, for Flores-Renteria.

Jennifer Jones, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
STATE v. SMITH.

No. COA07-905.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 5, 2008.

Certification Date February 25, 2008.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS55818).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. JONES-WHITE.

No. COA06-1402.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 17, 2007.

Certification Date August 6, 2007.

Appeal from Onslow (05CRS58847).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error in part and remanded for resentencing in part.
SCWC-15-0000012

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

THEODORE ROBERT BRISTOW, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-15-0000012; CASE NO. 3DCW-14-0001486)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Theodore Robert Bristow’s 

application for writ of certiorari filed on August 4, 2016, is 

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 13, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000012

13-SEP-2016

08:23 AM
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS 

We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-120092, and 333-111540) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-118178 and 333-149724) of American Electric Technologies, Inc. (formerly American Access Technologies, Inc.) of our reportdated March 18, 2010 with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of American Electric Technologies, Inc. as of and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Ham, Langston & Brezina, LLP 

Houston, Texas 

March 26, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,783
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,186
<PP&E>                                          97,318
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          468,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        350
<COMMON>                                         3,560
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,458,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,418
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,555
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (81,959)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (81,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (81,959)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
MARCH 31, 1998, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FOOTNOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,788
<PP&E>                                           6,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,164
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,060
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                     (14,362)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,096
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,228
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,315)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,316)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,354)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3521 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3521

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, as the ``Spencer Byrd 
                       Powers, Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 18 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

  Mr. Cochran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, as the ``Spencer Byrd 
                       Powers, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPENCER BYRD POWERS, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Spencer Byrd Powers, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Spencer 
Byrd Powers, Jr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
MORRISON v. OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE.

No. COA07-898.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 4, 2008.

Certification Date March 24, 2008.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. NO. 248201, I.C. NO. 281383).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth James WIGGINS and Robert Alphonso Cartwright.

No. 446P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

William D. Spence, Kinston, for Cartwright.

J. Allen Jernigan, Marc Bernstein, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*161Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 648 S.E.2d 865.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of September 2007 by Defendant (Cartwright) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements No. 333-70965 on Form S-8, No. 333-58160 on Form S-8 and No. 333-56734 on Form S-8 of LNR Property Corporation of our report dated January 7, 2003, on the combined financial statements of Lennar Land Partners andLennar Land Partners II appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LNR Property Corporation for the year ended November 30, 2002. 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Certified PublicAccountants 

 

Miami, Florida 

February 26, 2003