alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Council Decision 2014/294/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/294/CFSP of 20 May 2014 amending Decision 2013/233/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Border Management            Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/294/CFSP                     

# of 20 May 2014

# amending Decision 2013/233/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 May 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/233/CFSP(1) establishing the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya). Decision 2013/233/CFSP                              expires on 21 May 2015. The financial reference amount set therein covers the period from 22 May 2013 until 21 May 2014.

(2)Decision 2013/233/CFSP should be amended to extend the period covered by the financial reference amount until 21 May 2015.

(3)EUBAM Libya will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the                              objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Decision 2013/233/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:

Article 11(5) is replaced by the following:

‘5.The Head of Mission shall ensure the protection of EU classified information in accordance with Council Decision 2013/488/EU                                    of 23 September 2013 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information(2).’;                           

Article 13(1) is replaced by the following:

‘1.The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUBAM Libya for the period from 22 May 2013 to                                    21 May 2014 shall be EUR 30 300 000.                           

The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUBAM Libya for the period from 22 May 2014 to                                 21 May 2015 shall be EUR 26 200 000.’;                           

In paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 15, the references to ‘Decision 2011/292/EU’ are replaced by references to ‘Decision 2013/488/EU’.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 May 2014.

*For the Council,*                            

*The President*                            

A. Kyriazis                            

1

Council Decision 2013/233/CFSP of 22 May 2013 on the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya                              (EUBAM Libya) (OJ L 138, 24.5.2013, p. 15).                           

2

OJ L 274, 15.10.2013, p. 1.’;
#### In the Matter of Tyrese O., Also Known as Emmanuel T.M. Monroe County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Tracy O., Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 549]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see Matter of Jordan S.,*179 AD2d 1091 [1992]). (Appeal from Order of Family Court, Monroe County, John J. Rivoli, J.—Neglect). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Gorski, Martoche, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Theresa D. Becks, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the managing operator ofThe Campbell Fund Trust. (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, cash flows and financial highlights of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By:  /s/ Theresa D. Becks    Theresa D. Becks    Chief Executive Officer    March 31, 2008  
E 2
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Vincent C. Klinges, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Logility, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |     |  |                          
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|Date: July 16, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/    VINCENT C.
KLINGES
|                    |  |     |  | Vincent C. Klinges       
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Alfonza Dwanta COLTRANE a/k/a Alfonza Dawnta Coltrane.

No. 348A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 11, 2008.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 645 S.E.2d 793 (2007), finding no error in a judgment entered 1 February 2006 by Judge R. Stuart Albright in Superior Court, Randolph County. Heard in the Supreme Court 19 March 2008.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Anne Bleyman, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the appealable issue of right, that is, whether the evidence that defendant's driver's license was suspended or revoked *657was sufficient to submit the charge to the jury. The remaining issues addressed by the Court of Appeals are not properly before this Court and its decision as to these issues remains undisturbed.

AFFIRMED.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1086/2014Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1086/2014 of 14 October 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for anglerfish in VIIIa,            VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe by vessels flying the flag of Belgium         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1086/2014                     

# of 14 October 2014

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for anglerfish in VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe by vessels flying the flag of Belgium

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014(2) lays down quotas for 2014.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2014.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2014 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2014.

*For the Commission,*                            

*On behalf of the President,*                            

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and                              groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3458 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3458

    To prohibit golden parachute payments for former executives and 
                directors of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2008

   Mr. Bunning (for himself, Mrs. Dole, and Mr. Enzi) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit golden parachute payments for former executives and 
                directors of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON GOLDEN PARACHUTES.

    Section 1318(e)(1) of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial 
Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4518(e)(1)), as added by 
section 1114 of the Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 
2008 (Public Law 110-289), is amended by inserting before the period at 
the end the following: ``, and shall prohibit any golden parachute 
payment on or after the date of enactment of this subsection with 
respect to any executive officer or director of a regulated entity''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3220 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2008 

Mr. BARRASSO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber 

tow. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FIBER TOW. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3220 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic fiber tow 

(polyacrylonitrile tow) containing a minimum of 92 percent acrylonitrile by weight, 

from 200 to 600 ppm sodium 

and no organic solvent, the 

foregoing wound into spools 

each containing 24,000 filaments and with average filament measuring 1.3 decitex 

(plus or minus 0.15) (provided for in subheading 

5501.30.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,048                  20,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,298                 105,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,774                   7,944
<INVENTORY>                                     24,569                  18,577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,516                 152,177
<PP&E>                                          53,357                  59,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,748                   5,660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 486,810                 494,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,869                 111,534
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            16                      15
<OTHER-SE>                                     200,561                 185,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   486,810                 494,034
<SALES>                                        924,847                 589,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               924,847                 589,034
<CGS>                                          686,659                 429,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,144                 134,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (712)                   4,967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,088                   8,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (35)                  15,028
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,013                   7,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,066)                   7,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,066)                   7,743
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)                    0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)                    0.52


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21



                       List of Subsidiaries of the Company
                       -----------------------------------

1.    Aegis Realty Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

2.    Barclay/Aegis Inc., a Delaware corporation



        List of Subsidiaries of Aegis Realty Operating Partnership, L.P.
        ----------------------------------------------------------------

1.    Summit Insured Equity L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

2.    Summit Insured Equity L.P. II, a Delaware limited partnership

3.    Barclay/Aegis Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

4.    Aegis Waterford, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

5.    Aegis Oxford, L.L.C., a Mississippi limited liability company

6.    Southgate Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

7.    Southgate/Aegis L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

8.    Crossroads East Shopping Center, Ltd., an Ohio limited liability company

9.    Aegis Realty Holding Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
IN RE C.J.

No. COA06-1300.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Rowan (06JA43, 06JA44, 06JA45).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. William Barfield BOWIE.

No. 50A93-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 17, 2008.

Jill Ledford Cheek, Special Deputy Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of January 2008 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (William Barfield Bowie) shall have up to and including the 2nd day of June 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of January 2008."
Opinion filed November 16 , 2023



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ No. 11

- 2 3

- 00203

- CV

__________ IN THE INTEREST OF R.I.C., M.E.C., AND M.A.C. , CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 446th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. E
- 19

- 03

- 0453

- FM

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant , the mother of the children, has filed a pro se notice of appeal from

an associate judge’s order relating to child support

. Following the associate judge’s order, the father of the children timely filed a request for a de novo hearing in the district court. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 201.015 (West Supp. 2023 ). W e notified the mother by letter that , if the request for a de nov o hearing was timely filed , it did not appear that we had jurisdiction in this matter because the order from which she attempts to appeal is not a final, appealable order. See id. ; In re C.R.

- A.A. , No. 04

- 16

- 00587

- CV, 2016 WL 6238237, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Oct. 26, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.)

. In the letter, w e requested that the parties file a response advising if they agree that the request for a hearing was timely filed and2 provide this court with the date the hearing is scheduled , and we informed the mother that this appeal may be dismissed. The mother has not responded. The father responded and confirmed that he timely filed a request for a de novo hearing before the district court, and that a hearing is scheduled for November 16, 202 3. In his response, t he father stated that it is “our understanding [ that ] both parties intended on requesting a de novo hearing rather than an appeal to this Court.” The father further informed this court that the hearing on November 16 also relates to his request for temporary orders on a petition to modify the parent

- child r elationship. When a request for a de novo hearing is timely filed, a n associate judge’s order or recommendation is not a final, appealable order

. See In re C.R.

- A.A. , 2016 WL 6238237, at *1; Balachandrachari v. Tang , No. 05

- 15

- 00889

- CV, 2016 WL 3971323 , at *2 (Tex. App.

— Dallas July 22, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) ; see also In re W.M.C. , No. 11

- 11

- 00266

- CV, 2011 WL 5999374, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Eastland Dec. 1, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing F AM

. § 201.015)

. Unless specifically authorized by statute, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu , 233 S.W.3d 835, 840

– 41 (Tex. 2007); Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because the order from which Appel lant now attempts to appeal is not a final, appealable order, we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal and must dismiss it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3 (a)

. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

W. BRUCE WILLIAMS November 16, 2023 JUSTICE P anel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter , J. , and Williams, J.