alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN T-NETIX, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,420)
<INVENTORY>                                        100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,627
<PP&E>                                          76,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                (39,642)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,989
<BONDS>                                         23,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,477
<SALES>                                            382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,570
<CGS>                                              218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,079)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,079)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002 I, Edward A. Barnes, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q of Assisted
Living Concepts, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated:
November 10, 2004
    
    /s/ Edward A. BarnesEdward A. Barnes, Chief Financial Officer
In the Matter of D.S.M. appealed by Respondent D.S.M.

No. 236P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

John Keating Wiles, Raleigh, for D.S.M.

Meredith Jo Alcoke, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of May 2007 by Respondent (Juvenile) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
GIBBS v. DAISY.

No. 380P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for William Daisy.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of October 2005 by Plaintiff for Reconsideration and Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court In conference this the 3rd day of November 2005."
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned  chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
Registrant  hereby certify that, to their  knowledge,  this Quarterly  Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report")  fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                               By:/s/ Don Jennings
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Name: Don Jennings
                                  Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer



                               By:/s/ R. Clay Hulette
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Name: R. Clay Hulette
                                  Title:Vice President and Chief Financial
                                        Officer

                               Date: February 7, 2003


                                    page 17
In the Matter of the Application of Larry Eugene SMITH v. Frederick HUBBARD, Superintendent of Scotland Corr. Institution.

No. 505P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 16, 2007.

Larry Eugene Smith, Jr., Pro Se.

*883Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State/Hubbard.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 15th day of October 2007 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Scotland County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of October 2007."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

        In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Transition Report of MailKey
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending March 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "report"), Graham Norton-Standen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Roger B. Ponting, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do each hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

        (1)     the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



                                              /s/  Graham Norton-Standen
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Graham Norton-Standen
                                              Chief Executive Officer


                                              /s/  Roger B. Ponting
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Roger B. Ponting
                                              Chief Financial Officer


Date:  July 19, 2004
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAELA CASE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1982

[November 10, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Dina Keever-Agrama, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2021-MH001908-XXXX-NB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jacqueline I. 

Kurland, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2013201EN.01000401.xml

| 13.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 July 2013

adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2013

2013/C 201/05

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| — | the Union's budget for the financial year 2013 was definitively adopted on 12 December 2012 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union's budget for the financial year 2013 was definitively adopted on 12 December 2012 (2),

2

| — | on 15 April 2013, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 3 to the general budget for the financial year 2013. |
| --- | --- |

—

on 15 April 2013, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 3 to the general budget for the financial year 2013.

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2013 was adopted on 9 July 2013.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website (http://www.consilium.europa.eu/).

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2013.

For the Council

The President

R. ŠADŽIUS

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 66, 8.3.2013, p. 1, with corrigendum in OJ L 134, 18.5.2013, p. 21.

2

---
FILED'INI RECEIVED IN TheCourt ofAppeals ^IhthDhSEr"1" Sixth District nov o s 2015 MOV 0 6 2015 J nlhi^ Arfr,B' :^,"s. TexarKana, Texas 0o• MU , f 8y' R Debra K--^ey, Citato


### orA,^ AjpaiuA^ 0>u>4-i op.Von fi^»i^h_f Jw^ /^f^K^f^ 

### jrrj ^V<abhj/ ^>w £vr /e?o( oAo^ ,j£w> r^9^ ^QlAn 

### reUfcO. a^o/ttflon -r^&'nj uw( ctUr'ef tiouJ.a- be <y^c/dtU ^P ^^^'^ U /W c^ 4_ rec4)lfl ^ ^^ ^ ^*4^| o^&lar cam caW,1s>xl ^mMia^ v^ra^s 9Qn faa JfQJSr-
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3510 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3510

 To prohibit the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from 
   making funds available at a discount rate to private individuals, 
                    partnerships, and corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2008

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from 
   making funds available at a discount rate to private individuals, 
                    partnerships, and corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF DISCOUNT AUTHORITY FOR PRIVATE FIRMS.

    Section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 343) is amended by 
striking the third undesignated paragraph (relating to discounts for 
individuals, partnerships, and corporations).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32






CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(UNITED STATES CODE, TITLE 18, CHAPTER 63, SECTION 1350)


ACCOMPANYING ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF


CENTERLINE HOLDING COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009






In connection with the Annual Report of Centerline Holding Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc D. Schnitzer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Robert L. Levy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:







(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of our Company.










By:

/s/ Marc D. Schnitzer

By:

/s/ Robert L. LevyMarc D. Schnitzer

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

March 31, 2010



Robert L. Levy

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)

March 31, 2010






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. CAMPBELL.

No. COA07-950.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 5, 2008.

Certification Date February 25, 2008.

Appeal from Cumberland (04CRS69091).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
ROCCO v. ROCCO

No. COA06-555

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Guilford (02CVD4808).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
# The Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 198

Clean Air

# The Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

19th July 2013

Coming into operation

23rd August 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (13.1.2014) by The Smoke Control Areas (Exempted Fireplaces) (No. 2) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (S.R. 2013/292), **regs. 1**, **3**
June 30 , 2016



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

STATE FARM LLOYDS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00093

- CV V.

GINGER HANSON , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Ginger Hanson, signed October 23, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, State Farm Lloyds, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
STATE v. KELLEY.

No. COA07-481.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 15, 2008.

Certification Date February 4, 2008.

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS107419).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
#### Nails 21st Century Corp., Respondent, v Colonial Cooperative Insurance Co., Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 626]

*1070In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiff in an underlying personal injury action entitled *Parker v Nails 21st Century Corp.,*pending in the Supreme Court, Richmond County, under index No. 12495/01, the defendant appeals from an order from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Vitaliano, J.), dated November 22, 2004, which denied its motion for summary judgment, searched the record, and awarded summary judgment to the plaintiff declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend the plaintiff in the underlying action.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof which searched the record and awarded summary judgment to the plaintiff; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff nail salon commenced this action for a judgment declaring that the defendant insurance company was obligated to defend and indemnify it in an underlying personal injury brought by a customer who was allegedly injured while receiving a pedicure. The plaintiff notified the defendant of the accident approximately 11 months after it occurred, when it received the summons and complaint. The defendant disclaimed coverage on the ground that the plaintiff failed to provide it with timely notice of the occurrence, as was required by its insurance policy. The defendant argued that the nature of the injury was such that the plaintiff should have provided notice at or near the time of the occurrence. The Supreme Court denied the defendant’s motion, searched the record, and awarded summary judgment to the plaintiff. We modify.

Compliance with a notice of occurrence provision in an insurance policy is a condition precedent to the insurance company’s liability under the policy *(see Kaliandasani v Otsego Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,*256 AD2d 310 [1998]; *Kim v Maher,*226 AD2d 350 [1996]). Whether an insured has given timely notice of an occurrence depends on the particular facts and circumstances *(see Kaliandasani v Otsego Mut. Fire Ins. Co., supra; Kim v Maher, supra).*There are facts and circumstances, such as a good faith, reasonable belief in nonliability, that will excuse a delay in giving the required notice *(see Kaliandasani v Otsego Mut. Fire Ins. Co., supra; Kim v Maher, supra).*In such a case, notice is *1071timely if given promptly after the insured receives notice that a claim against it will, in fact, be made *(see E.T. Nutrition v Central Mut. Ins. Co.,*201 AD2d 451 [1994]). The burden of demonstrating the reasonableness of such an excuse is on the insured *(see Kaliandasani v Otsego Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,*supra; *Kim v Maher, supra).*There is a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff provided the defendant with timely notice of the occurrence. Thus, the plaintiff should not have been awarded summary judgment. Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Ritter and Rivera, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 8
                                                                       ---------



                                                               [GRAPHIC OMITTED]
                                                         [LOGO - GRANT THORNTON]



GRANT THORNTON LLP
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS



CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP


We hereby consent to the inclusion in Compton Petroleum Corporation's Annual
Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 of our audit report
dated April 19, 2004, on the consolidated balance sheets of Compton Petroleum
Corporation as at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated statements of
earnings, retained earnings and cash flow for each of the years in the three
year period ended December 31, 2003, to be filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta
April 19, 2004





Suite 1000
112 - 4th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 0H3
T    (403) 260-2500
F    (403) 260-2571
E    Calgary@GrantThornton.ca
W    www.GrantThornton.ca

Canadian Member of Grant Thornton International
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of the
Registrant hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Robert J. King Jr.Name: Robert J. King. Jr.Title: Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ James H. NicholsonName: James H. NicholsonTitle: Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 12,
2010
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 11, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D20-776 and 3D20-955

Lower Tribunal No. 18-14270

________________

James Celestin,

Appellant,

vs.

First Home Realty and Investment Corporation, et al.,

Appellees.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Barbara 

Areces, Judge.

Law Offices of James Jean-Francois, P.A., and James Jean-Francois 

(Hollywood), for appellant.

Wasson & Associates, Chartered, and Annabel C. Majewski; and 

Jeffrey Greenhaus, for appellee Dario Desrouleaux.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.